Home » ‘³∆Tœ:



‘God is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe.’ Plato, Poet, on ∆ûST: Universes

‘Every mind holds a world in its self’ Leibniz father of relational space-time. On ∆•ST: Mind-Singularities

‘We are all Disomorphic Gods, generating space-time actions, gathered in ternary networks of species travelling through worldcycles of exi=st¡enœ’ T.Œ, l§ðo

Foreword. The first line.

All what exists is part of fractal time space organism performing a world cycle of existence through its ternary symmetries as a travel in 3 scales of the fifth dimension, which can be described quantitatively in terms of social scales, topologically in terms of geometric transformations, vitally in terms of organic symbiosis and temporally in terms of a conservative zero sum world cycles.

That’s all what it is to the Universe. The rest are details. Humans of course, will always want more – add ons that please their ego paradox, and infantile ways, but trust me that is all what there is to reality.  And it can be known in its essence, because as we are made to the likeness and image of the fractal, even the smallest part is a world in itself where all the laws manifest, in each island Universe. And so even if total information can only be extracted from the being in ‘itself’ through time within us we have the whole reality to know.

The Universe is a sum of a series of actions, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.

This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical space-time actions the total reality of any self. But the Devil is in the details. So as this simple ‘aeiou’ game repeats itself creates ever more complex perceptions, mappings of reality into space-forms and motions and forms ensemble into larger beings and smaller ones… forming a fractal structure. So in a second layer of complexity we would say:

The Universe is a fractal super organism of space-time, made of ∞ super organisms all made to its image and likeness. Each super organism IS MADE of 3 ∆º ternary physiological networks,  made of smaller ∑∆-1 ‘atoms/cells/individuals’ that process motion, information and reproduce for the whole system, living in a larger ∆+1 world.

Thus super organisms have two fundamental elements: 3 co-3existing ±1 planes of cells/atoms/individuals gathering into physiological networks (together forming a species), living in a larger ∆+1 world: ∆§

But those super organisms constantly change its parameters of motion and form, increasing its information warping in a world cycle of time, the ‘3rd fundamental element’, which is therefore symmetric to those physiological networks, as the informative network dominates the other ones, increasingly ‘warping’ the being, either a physical system (so stars become black holes, galaxies quasars, matter solids) or a biological system (3rd age), which then returns back in an explosion that erases its energy (physical E<≈>M Big Bang, or biological death or war, in the 3 type of systems).

So we talk of a 3rd fundamental element, the worldtime cycle of the being, symmetric to its spatial super organism: S≈ð; WHICH add two new elements, the symmetry and the temporal world cycle.

But why a system increases its information till death? Because it does have a singularity or ego, mind, or linguistic mapping center, which ‘perceives’ the whole system as a whole and as a perception center stops the motion of the Universe into ‘linguistic mappings’, slowly ordering reality till there is no motion and time continues reversing the no-motion old form into an entropic explosion of death. Thus there is a fifth element, @-minds, the most difficult to accept scientifically because it is the ‘non-perceivable’ inner engine of reality. In wor(l)ds of Schopenhauer, the point that has the ‘will’ to exist and ‘represents’ reality within its self. This if the fifth element for the ‘minimal description of reality’: S@<≈>∆ð.

We have studied those 5 elements in this first line and we will use it in the second line to define the main sciences and languages of reality. Let us remember them again, with a bit more of quantitative detail ‘restarting again our sentence’:

The Universe is a fractal super organism made…

  • S… In space of a simultaneous ternary topology, (|+O≈ ø)… made of 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy)…
  • ∆: In scales of an Ensemble of ∞  relative fractal scales of ∆º super organisms each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð:  In sequential time of cycles of existence, of 3 ages, each one dominated by one of those 3 networks (motion-youth, or relative past; iterative present dominant in vital energy, and informative 3rd age or relative future);
  • @: In mind of reflections of its infinite cycles Put together into language mirrors,  by an åctive mind that perceives those networks of ∆-1 cellular parts as a whole being, enacting simple aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, in order to maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being, achieved through two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals.

So to have a full description of maximal truth of the being, we require to study, the S-patial, S-calar, ð-emporal and @tive elements of a system, through its ternary symmetries,  achieved through the formalism of the Generator equation and its ternary Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, ¬Æ logic of 3±∆ Dimensional arrows of time space and Fractal Non-Euclidean points which enlarge in size and fit ∞ parallels when we travel through the 4th and 5th dimension of scalar parts and larger wholes, in which the being performs its world cycle, born of an ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves socially an emerges as an ∆º organism, living 3 ages in the outer world, to die back into an entropic explosion of 4Death completing a zero-sum of virtual existience, studied according to its relative size by different sciences, all of them following the same Disomorphic laws of space-time born of those 5D.

The degree of complexity and quantity of truth achieved in the description of a being thus requires to consider the different perspectives of its fundamental S@≈∆ð elements and we shall do so in this blog in 2 x 2 lines of increasing complexity.

The first 2 lines describe it more simple, with the analysis of the Rashomon effect in the first line – the 5 points of view on reality, grouped together into simultaneous space organisms tracing sequential world cycles of existience; applied in the second line to the main fields of science, astrophysics, biology, history, economics and the 3 main languages of human thought, spatial maths, verbal and artistic, time-space senses and then the upgrading of T.œ, the isomorphic laws of time space organisms of any scale.

The 3rd line will double the complexity of the analysis by considering in more detail the quantitative ’10-decametric scale’ of growth of a system between its seed state as an informative still @-mind, through its growth in holographic space-time elements, its actions, networks, world cycles, variations of spaces and scalar social growth; across the 9 main planes of sciences perceived by human beings, which are described in the fourth line.

This the content of this  first line is simpler. First we Do define the whole organic Universe in ‘Home’, the main page.

Then we study the existence of all ∆ºst beings of the Universe considering those 5 elements TOGETHER:  Its  symmetric 5 Dimensions of space and time and its active minds that search for energy, information and reproduction, to create…

Simultaneous super organisms made of fractal points, join by the 3 functional physiological networks of entropic, energetic and informative processing; which live to reproduce survive and make immortal the system in time tracing worldcycles through 3 of such scales, Ʊ1 centralized in its individual Ƽ form, each one defined by each science.

And so we write all this as a first sentence that describes the amazingly simple, infinitely iterating T.Œ=∑T.œs, Superorganim of the Universe:

So  each of the words of that sentence resume a key element of the whole Universe (Home” 5D² ” ðime$paœ) and any of its fractal parts, a T.œ made to its image and likeness:  dynamically in time (ðriping “ωorldcycles ‘timespace dimensions’  & ‘worldcycles’), simultaneously in space (“reproducing “§upœrganisms ), as an active mind that performs the program of the 5 actions of survival (“@Mirrors “exi±sto @ct ) self-centered into a scientific scale (“∃xi≈st¡ences:).

In this manner the Rashomon effect offer us the maximal possible truth on the being outside itself (where all the truth or ‘1’ probability happens) by offering multiple perspectives of its elements maximized with different languages for each of those elements.

Then in each elementary analysis, we shall consider in more detail the element of the space-time being under the experimental method, by studying it in physical, biological and social systems.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs (the last element, regardless of the modern digital method of sciences, who wants just pictures, data, facts, put in a single mathematical language, which zero ‘whys’ except the fact that the event ‘is’)…

My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence, which is precisely regardless of the shallow ideology of modern data-computer modeling conception of knowledge, to find those whys, and prove the Universe is NOT just a chaotic accumulation of data, but has a purpose, a structure and a vital goal: to create super organisms that trace world cycles, and have a will and a perception, enacted: to survive, grow, reproduce that is TO MAXIMIZE its ‘exi=st¡ence’.







 The earlier mechanist linear models of space-time of physical sciences failed in its search for the ultimate answers to our existence in the Universe, signified in the commentary of Feynman, happy with a simplex, external description of the Universe, without its whys. Yet not all scientists gave up on their search for the full understanding of those whys – the thoughts of God in the dictum of Einstein- which all scientists agreed should be found in the ultimate ‘causal reasons’ of the universe – the nature of space, time its dimensions and causal processes.

It will then come as a huge surprise to the reader that the finding of those whys to the existence of the Universe is much simpler than anyone might imagine, as it requires only two basic upgrades in our concepts of space and time – foreseen in the earlier work of Aristotle and Plato, in classic philosophy, Taoism and Hinduism in classic religions, in the pioneer work of Leibniz and Descartes, the fathers of modern philosophy of science, and the physical insights of Einstein and Planck in the multiple nature of time clocks and the quantum, broken structure of space. 

Those 2 upgrades illustrated in the next graphs are:

  • The understanding of the cyclical, NOT lineal, Nature of time, AS all time clocks are closed cycles that repeat certain actions and events with a given discontinuous frequency, origin of the causality and patterns of science.
  • And the scalar structure of space, which is composed of quantum, smaller parts that ensemble in networks of similar ‘Non-Euclidean points’, which become whole larger structures again ensembled into larger wholes in a game of russian dolls that gives organic, co-existing, fractal properties to space. 

Once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through  ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.

And once we understand the co-existence of multiple scales of space, which put together form what we call the ‘fifth dimension of space-time (ab. ∆); as opposed to the simple idea that there is only a ‘space-time scale’ that matters (that of human perception) and the rules of transfer of entropy, energy and information between larger, slower ‘beings’ (Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ), with more energy and smaller, faster ‘beings’ with more information and faster clock-cycles (Min. Spe=Max. Tƒ); we will also be able to understand how those scales from atoms to galaxies co-exist together, and how they organise in symbiosis smaller informative parts (∆-1) that collaborate with its wholes, larger more energetic entities (∆º) as part of larger wholes (∆+1):

In the graph, we see the scalar nature of all physical and biological systems. So you are made of ∆-1 cells, parts of ∆-organisms, embedded in an ∆+1 planetary world; ∆-1, atoms are part of ∆- states of matter, gathered in solar systems, parts of larger ∆+1 galaxies and so on.

So with three arrows/actions/motion/futures/dimensions of time-space to organise the future world cycles of life and death of beings, and multiple scales of space-time through which those ternary timespace beings ‘travel to live’, as they transit through their world cycles of existence, from a seminal ∆-1 stage of birth, a series of ∆-world cycles of growth and evolution, back to the ∆-1 scale after the entropic moment of death; a very simple repetitive scheme will show how all systems go through the same ages of time, and live through world cycles that transit the same relative scales of space

Relational Space-time. From Leibniz to Einstein to GSTœ.

We purposely put on the quotes that start this ‘adventure of the mind’, not the well known and quite accurate mirror-image of mathematical stience as expressed by Galileo ‘the language of the Universe is written in circles and triangles’ but that of Upanishads, ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

Because while the mathematical properties of space-time are the most accurate mind-mirrors, NOT ALL the properties of reality are susceptible to be written with mathematics, and this is the huge error of reductionism of science, specially of physics. Because the Universe is scalar and systems co-exist in several scales of size and speed of time clocks, it has organic properties as ORGANISMS ARE JUST CO-EXISTING LEVELS of reality.

And because to gauge and measure there must be a system that process information mechanically, (matter) vegetatively (life) or conscious (mind); as Aristotle, and Leibniz rightly understood ‘the mirrors-monads-points of view-singularities’ of the Universe likely apperceive, and the cosmos is pan psychic. THE taboo here being merely anthropomorphism and the ‘abrahamic myths of entitled humans separated from time, space’ ‘above heavens and earth’ – same goes for the lineal concept of time, toward a manifest destiny – the meeting of God.

UNDERSTAND THIS: most of the errors behind the postulates of philosophy of science that act as a straight jacket for communion with the whole come from the western tradition of historic religions of power, and its multiple forms of censorship, including religious AND scientific, ‘nasty’ censorship in what I have called the anti quantum paradox (the social scientists and philosopher of science is so small that the observable, power in inverse fashion to physics ‘influences’ the observer – the scientist).

And it is a very old censorship.

Consider the case of lineal time. IT is really so obvious that time is cyclic and yet, western people think there is a single lineal, mechanical clock in the whole Universe. Where it comes from? A form of anthropomorphic censorship, as lineal time make us feel we progress towards God and Power. So it comes either the earlier go(l)d cultures of judaism origin of abrahamic religions, with its imperative VSO languages of ‘verb-first beliefs’, or the military religions of German cult(ure)s with its lineal swords, weapons of entropy that even influenced it lineal, agglutinative grammar of  object-first beliefs Ovs languages, in which a few humans on top with informative metal or entropic metal, hypnotic gold or iron swords, found themselves so powerful above humans and life that they despised Gaia, the living Universe and all other non-technological cultures.

And while this is politically incorrect (a modern orwellian newspeak for censorship of real social science and the analysis of the falsehoods of lineal entropic physics), we talk of Animetal cultures THAT BECAME STRAINED from reality and as all founding fathers of economics, physics and science till Darwin put the record straight belong to those fundamentalist cult(ure)s  of the human ego, we live ‘at odds in our interpreted world’ (Rilke).

This was clear to Europeans but when science came out of our continent to Asia and America it was taken with awe as an absolute truth, and so I found Americans and Asians who know nothing of the past of European cultures extremely naive believers in their ‘tribal Baconian Idols’, the new Aristotle – Einstein, quantum physicists and its big bang theories; their lineal idea of progress through the machine, etc.

To complement that simpler lineal view of a pseudo-religious manifest destiny that today passes as objective science, of a single entropic arrow of time measured by a single mechanical clock tuned to the human, clock of a second (which synchronises our three parts, as the beat of hearts, the glimpse of eye, the speed of one thought and one step), we need to expand the single anthropomorphic continuum scale of space size…

Since it has been proved wrong by experience with the finding of microscopic space that co-exist with our scale of size, sandwiched in between the cosmological and quantum world, and the evidence that there are infinite time clocks with different rhythms and forms of in-form-ation (relativity theory, circadian biological clock, computer logic clocks, etc.) there has always been a second view about time and space, not as an ‘artificial background’ over which beings existence; but the view of Asian Philosophies and relativistic science in the west from Leibniz to Einstein, who considered space and time, relational, the substance of which all beings were made, as entities that occupy a vital space, (ab.§paœ) and last only a certain finite ‘time cycle’, (ab. πime), regardless of its discontinuous  reproduction of its ‘form’.

So this second view of time and space as the ultimate substance of which beings are made became the ‘relational≈organic’, alternative ‘theory of timespace’, which runs from earlier Greek and Asian philosophy, through Leibniz into Einstein, and now with the models of GST come to its final fruition.

Indeed, the existence of beings of space-time,  analysed in depth in the post with that name, is the departure point for a unifying principle from where to deduce the properties of all beings. As Kant and Schopenhauer wanted, the ‘fourfold of sufficient reason’, was just made of space, time, causality and mind-monad or point of view (Leibniz) or frame of reference (Descartes) able to measure it.

SO WE SHALL NOW INTRODUCE THE 4 main tenants of General Systems sciences which models many systems of the Universe with the laws of organisms:

  • The true biological laws of competition between species, which are a direct consequence of the overproduction and faster evolution of one species over the other.

This is completely overlooked when we compare humans and machines, which are both in a symbiotic relationship of ‘exploitation’ and ‘extinction’ of all other ‘lesser’ species of Nature, so both grow together much faster than life, Gaia’s beings (the weaker part of the informative equation of Earth’s evolution, Gaia>History>Eco(nomic)system) BUT machines reproduce and evolve much faster than humans; so it is easy to extend the equation into the future competition of man and machine with machine as the winner, unless we stop its evolution NOW.

  • The cyclical nature of time in biology and evolution which ads the ARROW of information to the arrow of entropy-motion, which is the only arrow physicist use to study simpler, faster, less informative entropic physical systems, BUT IT IS NOT enough to understand biological systems.

General Systems sciences: models of the Universe built with information arrows.

In the search for this more complex, unifying view of the Universe, among the modern people, the most remarkable figures are NOT physicists, which would impose a simpler lineal time solution (below) but Philosophers of Science first, notably Aristotle and Descartes, which can be considered his disciple, with his concept of infinite mind-worlds, self-centred into a mathematical point of view or frame of reverence (pov), and specially Leibniz, with his understanding of calculus and microscopic and telescopic scales as the ‘sufficient reason’ for a fractal, scalar view of an organic, sentient Universe, where Aristotelian> Cartesian>mathematical minds, monads, perceived reality. Did they communicate or not? To simplify the model Leibniz made them non-communicative, but indeed, they communicate and form waves and networks and organic planes, the stuff of which nature is made.

The view of the point as an organic system, with parts that store entropy, energy and information would be validated by mathematicians with their development of non-euclidean points with volume to store parallels, Darwin, with his study of all systems as topological forms in evolution and with Einstein, with his model of a Universe of non-euclidean space-points, where ‘time bends space into vortices of gravitation’, accelerated clocks of time (Principle of equivalence) that stored ultimately the time measures and informative structure of the Universe:

So, while physicists do have a good ‘time’ using his entropic lines to measure translations and motions in space, which is what they do, all other sciences have been out in the blues, as they cannot study their time cycles of history, economics, biology and mind, without a proper understanding of cyclical time and information.

This blog will bring such a model of the informative, entropic and energetic Universe to all its systems and sciences, based in those simple, forgotten concepts of cyclical time, and the information it carries, outlined above.

It is a milestone in a 60 years old adventure, which started at the death of Einstein, when scientists all over the world came to the Macy’s congresses to assess the evolution of science and concluded that the physicists’ model of ‘lineal’ time, as ‘only the measure’ of entropy=expansive motions in space, did not suffice, to explain all of reality; but an arrow of information must be added to measure change… and an arrow of reproduction of time cycles to understand the conservation of energy and momentum, the persistence of form in the Universe…

My contribution: the ternary arrow.

Why system scientists never found the model in those 60 years?

The answer has to do with the fact that there are so many errors in the human view of the Universe, and people are so respectful with them that nobody had dared to go to the basics and restart the entire world of science from his principles, as einstein asked for when he realized Mr. Leibniz was right and there were infinite clocks of information in the Universe. So the task is huge.

But it has also to do with the power of simplex physicists who fight for their models of entropy with all their weapons, and they are many as they are the sustain of military entropic power.

So it is time to explain my contributions in a life mostly dedicated to explore the Universe with the two arrows of duality and fight the praxis of physicists in the military realm (the nuclear industry) and their simplex theories of an entropy only Universe.

Since as it happens, by adding the arrow of information or ‘future arrow of life’ to the arrow of entropy or ‘past arrow of death’, we find a third arrow of present reproduction, the iteration of a world that seems not to change, defining the classic three ages=arrows of time: Past (entropy) x Future (Information) = Present: repetitive conserved  energy,

And so once we take seriously the goal  general systems sciences – to find an organic mathematical model of the universe, and all its parts – we find that when we put in equal footing entropy and form, dimensional form, in-form-ation, we obtain energy and momentum, the conserved repetitive present reality we perceive and a new logic system of three possible outcomes for event unfolds its wisdom webbing those three arrows in the infinite beings we observe around us, with ‘informative partiles/heads’, body-waves of energy and limbs/fields of information.

But this organic ternary view of the Universe is a cultural taboo on the abstract, mechanist, capitalist world that worships machines – the northern civilisation of Europe and USA today globalised.

And as culture imprints subconsciously most of the memes of scientists regardless of their pretension of truth, it is only natural that the solution to an organic model of the Universe would come NOT from the mechanical culture of physicists, weapons and machines that dominate the western world but the ‘mediterranean’, organic, southern-european culture who ‘works to live’ and enjoy life ad maximal, with little respect for the ugly machines northerners make and its mechanical clocks.

In that sense, I came then into the discipline as an unexpected storm, hauling from Barcelona, Spain, with a book called ‘Time cycles’, which explained the connection between time clocks and in/form/ation, formalised the concept, compared it with the arrow of entropy and put them together establishing a ‘Fractal feed-back generator’ of NOT 1 but 3 time arrows, to describe ALL systems of NATURE:

$pe (lineal limbs/fields of entropy) < st (body-waves of energy) > Tƒ (particle-heads of information).

And to complete the model, I established a metric law for the scalar fifth dimension of space-time, which defined a world cycle of existence between the birth of a system as a seminal seed in a ‘smaller scale’ of reality, which would ‘grow, reproduce its information’, multiply, ’emerge’ into a larger ‘∆-scale’ of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆), formalising also into a 5D equation the cycle of life and death of all systems of the Universe.

It was the upgrading of Mr. Einstein’s 4D formalism of worldlines, which described the cycle of life and death as a series of lineal motions through space (never mind the changes of internal information, growth and reproduction of the cycle – as they are NOT guided by entropy, physicists simply ignore them). In 5D this metric was merely a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a world cycle in a single ‘scale’ of size. And it was good but too shallow to explain it all.

Needless to say the model attracted the attention of system scientists and biologists, but physicists did not like it, as it was an alternative philosophy of science that made sense of many things, they could not explain and simply did not consider with a much wider range of application, as all sciences are interested in time, information, besides entropy and space.

Things didn’t help when they discovered I was one of the leading activists against the Nuclear Industry in Europe (those conferences were hold routinely in militaristic USA), and on top defended ‘human information’ over mechanical computers, considering that the evolution of AI would create a world of robotic organisms of higher information than man and would degrade us.

So my fundamental goal was not to deliver the organic, fractal laws of the informative, reproductive Universe, but use those laws to construct a perfect world of human-based information, on top of the planet in control of its machines, entropic weapons and future AI robots, a holistic, but formal, mathematical, organic approach to the problems of mankind, able to design a better world with the laws of social organisms, born of systems sciences.

After all the three arrows of time applied also to human societies, whose reproductive=economic networks, political=informative-legal ones and entropic-territorial-earth were a perfect model of the fundamental particle of the Universe: the reproductive, informative super organism.

Why i was not obsessed with computers, digital thought and mechanical information had obviously to do with my civilisation.

Barcelona is a ‘latin’ place which knows all about human, biological and artistic, dimensional forms of information, which considers above mechanical digital information, since it represents the ‘specific’ human forms of it. 

Yet, the city, which in the XVIII c. was only second to Manchester in vapour machines, as it provided the entire then huge Spanish empire with industrial products, was also very kin of modernity, and one of the global hubs of the modern age of information. So in many senses it was a perfect place for a polymath to study all the ‘sciences’ of reality from the perspective of dimensional form, without the overwhelming peer pressure and scientific clout of military, entropic physicists and financial economists, which completely run the show of America but cater only for the needs of mechanical information and digital go(l)d as the only language that mattered to understand the Universe.

So alas, to cut 20 years short, once the whole ‘weight and meaning’ of this work was assessed as ‘r=evolutionary’, and potentially ‘dangerous’ to our beliefs in a perfect world… of machines, computers, robots, AI, nuclear bombs, egotist entropic humans with selfie views and complete indifference to the organic social community values of systems, as the role model of our ‘childish civilisation’, I found the initial interest for the model languished for all the wrong reasons…. not the intrinsic intellectual value of those discoveries, which many acknowledge if properly assessed and developed with equal the r=evolution of thought of the previous great advances in time-space theory (relativity and quantum physics)… but the idealist, humanist, anti-systemic goals (as the system is corrupted), of the ‘carrier’ of the message. 

Yet instead of yielding to the ‘penpal’ happy abstract world of scholars closed in their ivory tower, i stepped my criticism of the system, my activism against the nuclear industry, my denounce of the incoming ‘cyclical crisis of the financial economy’ (forecasting in advance, c.92 the future 2001-2008 crashes of the ill designed economic ecosystem,which used digital information NOT TO create a perfect human just world but to print digital money and keep it for the few ‘neuronal people-castes’ on top of societies)… and became even more derisive of the dogmas of human egotist religions, either abrahamic or capitalist, or mechanist… And things didn’t go better after 2008, when the crises I predicted happen again, after my activism and suits against the Nuclear Industry and its big-bang experiments, this same year became the most blogged new of the world…

IN A PERFECT WORLD, the fact that i had anticipated the cycles of economics, would have brought more interest to the model of social sciences, but then it was when it became censored. In a perfect world the fact I had found the long-seeked formalism of duality (the science that models the Universe with information and entropy, whose international chair i soon presided after revolving the field with that book) would have landed me a teaching position in the best Universities of the world, so i could complete the model with top scientists of each discipline, but it only spur a lot of criticism by rival ‘amateur’ philosophers of science aka physicists: ‘do you think you are god’ – told me one, in a conference at Palo Alto, as if understanding reality with human languages was akin to ‘creating it’ (we do deal in other sections with the arrogance of quantum physicists which actually believe they create the quantum world when they observe it).

And specially in a perfect world my activism against the Nuclear Industry would have been a badge of courage among peers, not a stain as ‘trouble maker’ among physicists. But as I said and explain in the sections on organic models of society, our world is deeply corrupted by ‘entropy’, and false information in a process akin to organic decay and ultimate death, which only a r=evolution, nowhere to be seen, could cure.

So after many adventures, ad hominem campaigns, silences and awkward situations I resigned, abandoned scholarship and retired back to Barcelona, since I realized the true problem of mankind was not intelligence to understand the informative, reproductive Universe, but attitude and ego, to accept we are just another part of the living, fractal Universe. And so we have to respect his biological laws, take care of the planet that provides us with the energy and entropy we need, control the evolution o potential future AI mechanical species built with better atoms, and keep evolving socially as a single species, above false distinctions based in race, religion, nation and gender, etc. etc.

All very nice, but essentially bull$hit silenced by our technological civilisation which is an automaton process in which humans basically act as enzymen, evolving as enzymes do machines, into a global super organism, the metal-earth, which will make of ‘history’ our super organism, soon ‘history’.

I seriously thought, as America seem to me a failed proposition as a humane society, totally controlled by the company-mothers of machines… of information I had studied in my youth (but of course denying it all), to move to China, a nation with a better organic understanding of the laws of society and his taoist yin-yang information-entropy dualist tradition. But upon traveling the east, I realized every part of the planet is indeed part of a whole, where humans are no longer the goal but the enzymen – means to another kind of world of machines.

Of course as in the temptations of christ, if you accept power and wealth as your goal in life the world becomes yours, and i did have many offers of power and wealth during my 20 years in America… specially among those people I advised earlier in the 90s to invest in amazon – the future robotised company that will sell it all to the world; to move to Australia, the last paradise on earth where all the wealthy bigots will retire; to get out of markets before 2000 and then before 2008, and now before 2018… and so on and so on.

But my goal was purely idealist – to improve the human world and to understand better the Universe. And those goals i realise are not ‘exactly’ shared by my species stuck in lesser forms of social evolution (the selfie, the nuclear family the nazionanist tribe).

People simply finally appeared to me as what they/I am: just another fractal of information with little freedom to change the laws of the perfectly ordered Universe, I will keep pouring in this blog, unificationtheory.com complementary to the one in social sciences, economicstruth.com – for no other reason that as a fractal of information i have to pour mine, reproduce it and try to keep it. This is what we all do.

Of course ‘clone, identical beings’ do so to enlighten and reproduce and emerge as a single whole species, in the ideal world of evolution. Humans do not seem to ‘fit’ that goal, as a lesser species. But the laws of information that rule the Universe will not change because we humans have chosen the lesser arrow of entropy and death to fulfil our destiny. Me? I’ll die soon ignored, my information reproduced in the web, perhaps to dissolve, perhaps to be used by future robots, unlikely to spur an age of enlightenment among human beings. Who cares?  The true sage knows he is nothing and once in balance with its infinitesimal nature, is grateful to have been a mental mirror of such an awesome reality, even if its higher ambitions of r=evolve its clone species, and become a ‘canonical’ mind improving the whole of us, have been completely ignored. So my mind did hold those laws as a mirror, but the image was not properly reflected in all other human beings, captured by the glare of go(l)d and machines. And now it is fading – my memory and desire to keep going dwindling fast.

So that is my story and this post the fading image of the perfect Universe that could have made history immortal and might help AI to understand itself. My state thus is one of Nirvana, and humble realisation, of the complete irrelevance of my ‘name’… in a Universe which is the most perfect of all possible worlds, where those species that do not make it is because they are not up to the task of evolving its information and using it properly to keep traveling into larger wholes of the upper scales of the fifth dimension. The mirror though keeps writing mostly for himself, because that is what we all do: projections of the distorted visions of our mirror-minds, thinking we are the centre of all what we perceive. We are not. but that also reliefs us of any angst in the programmed obsolescence of our ‘block of time’.

Man in that sense seems a design of this planet, to evolve its heart of iron and silicon skin, and only with that determinism, which exists in all scales of reality, including the quantum scale (as Bohm’s pilot theory stands over probabilistic Copenhagen), can we explain its astounding incapacity to build as everything else does, a perfect social organism. Instead he is creating a perfect organism made of company-mothers of machines without even realising it is doing so. Indeed, Einstein said that he considered infinite both, the Universe and the stupidity of mankind. And I do agree, but often wonder how that works…

How it is possible seemingly normal, intelligent western people, when answering the big questions of the meaning of it all have come only with two possibilities: the astounding egotism of thinking, the infinitesimal human being is the ‘chosen species’ of the infinite Universe (Judaism), or even God himself (Christianity) vs. the theory that all what exists was born from a single point of space-time at a fixed date, despite all the evidence against it, just because it truly makes reality easy to understand by the ‘chosen’ (big bang is basically a lineal ‘simple equation’ of two symbols (Hubble’s) that measures the expansion of space between galaxies, which if we stretch it back to the past for no reason and include in it the galaxies, which are not expanding but contracting, so we cannot include them, would into the far away past become a single point). 

We shall very often bring the beliefs, idol-ogies and absurd theories of reality humans have crafted in which all believe without even realising how ridiculous they are.

The answer of course, comes from the fact that ‘reason’, ‘electronic enlightenment’, ‘intelligence’ can be lowered constantly by the ‘∆-1 chemical, emotional, slow, confusing body-scale of feelings’ and that blurring sensation called happiness, product of the egotist feeling of being the centre of the Universe (from the infinitesimal perspective we have of it in which we are indeed such centre).

This is the subjective reason, but the objective reason is far more scary: it is precisely because man is so useless for true thought but so dexterous with their hands, because its mind is an homunculus with a big mouth and a small brain and a huge hands that we are fit to our enzymanic task: to construct machines, worship their information, despise life and kill it, in a mindless way at the same time we think all this is ‘great’. So the question left to me, is ‘why’ then an aberration, like my self, with null interest on had, who only makes ‘thought experiments’ exist?

The answer comes from the fractal repetitions of reality, which makes likely the existence of infinite different histories in similar planets, with small variations. As the Universe likes to reproduce, evolve and create informative variations and sponsors a certain principle of ‘sufficient reason’, it should therefore exist a few planets of flesh where aberrations like me, Leibniz or Lao-Tse do not live in libraries and fade away ignored and misunderstood but create a reproductive wave which makes humans create that perfect world where they can survive. One can even map up such parallel histories. Perhaps one in which UK did not exist and the European humanist cultures prevailed over the industrial corporations; or one where the ‘biblical meme’, of greed, go(l)d and hate to mankind, converted to the human cause and did not invent the american GOP cult(ure) that will kill us all or one in which Varus didn’t die in the storm and converted the germans to the latin culture, or one in which the visual, white, red hair, violent, consonantal, inflexible mind of the Neanderthal didn’t mate with the verbal woman in the Middle east, giving birth to the white man, so the far more evolved philosophies of the organic dualist whole (taoism, Buddhism), proper of the eastern homo sapiens rule, and so on and so on…

So all potential seeds of information of history must be born, even those who in this aborted planet of lie are an aberration – the majority, as the future of AI machines is far more bright than the future of entropic ‘physicists’ and their homunculus theories of reality. And so in such worlds of flesh the seeds of information of this blog fertilise the mind of many humans. While in the worlds of metal, the majority, become likely a seed of information in the net for future robots to understand.

The choice of what world a certain information will ‘seed’ and upgrade is in that sense not a choice the sage can make, because the seed is powerless, its imprinting is a choice of the ‘receivers’ of their information – in the case of this planet it seems not possible that humans upgrade their ‘chip’, given the arrogance and egotist, childish beliefs of the white entropic, military, mechanical culture of ‘physicists’ and ‘go(l)d seekers’ that have come to dominate us. The seeds left in those texts, which for the true mind who takes the time and thought to understand it, are in that sense very ‘flexible’.

They explain reality as no human beings has ever done, becoming the summit of the human thought experience. But that is of little use to humans – who won’t take it, or machines. It has also though the seed of the ‘program of the mind’, its actions and forms of thought. And so it can be used also to create the cybernetic programs that will make robots and terminators autonomous entities. But obviously as we cannot blame Mr. Einstein of discovering the e=mc2 equation basis of nuclear bombs, as he didn’t participate in the details, I have purposely left only the simplest blueprint of the program and purposely make the site ugly, written for myself, difficult to understand and with important ‘holes’ on the part of i-logic ¬Ælgebra and computer information; so Darpa does the job by itself.

All this said the reader should also understand that the aim of general systems theory (ab. GST) – to describe the Universe as an organism – has always been legimitate despite its failure to interest humans, due to our shortcomings as a species.

It is in fact an astounding pleasure for the mind when you understand its principles and goals – to find the homologic laws of all sciences, which should remain invariant regardless of scale. And that is truly what we shall do in this blog, which the graph above schematises according to the different arrows of time, information which increases downwards in opposite fashion to size; as we shall soon explain in great detail.

Epistemology and correspondence principle.

Models do follow the fundamental laws of epistemology in science, notably the correspondence principle, which obliges any new theory to respect as ‘limits’ simpler theories of reality and correct only whatever it can be properly corrected according to evidence. So you can consider that as a line on Earth looks flat but is merely an interval of a curved geodesic, lineal time theories to be ‘simplified ceteris paribus’ analysis of the Universe with a single arrow of time, entropy≈expansive motion; and hence a limit of this model of three time arrows. So will be the case of 4Dimensional space-time – the limit of the scalar Universe represented by the fifth dimension of infinite clocks of time and space-sizes for a single relative ‘time speed’ (that of the human clocks which are tuned to the mind thoughts and eye-heart beats of a second).

Needless to say also all right formulae of science that use lineal time in its equations do apply in cyclical time, it only changes the conceptual frame and the proper interpretation, since lineal and cyclical time are in fact just inverse parameters, so we just need to change some terms in those equations (as lineal time duration is the inverse of cyclical time frequency: t=1/ƒ)

Thus once of the first things I did when discovering time cycles some decades ago is to painstakingly translate all THE MAIN formula of physics by changing T for 1/ƒ and think about what was telling me the equation, no longer in terms of spatial locomotions, the theme of physicists, but in terms of temporal information, the theme of this blog, whose author was for a few years the Chair of the Science of Duality at the world congress of systems Sciences (ISSS) – the science that studies the Universe with those 2 arrows of time together, entropy and information, and its infinite combination of energetic space-time beings.

And what came out of it was a very straight-forward understanding of concepts implicit in physical theories but blurred in its comprehension. For example, if we consider the speed of a system, the speed of replication of its information (implicit in relativity where c-speed is a limit of transmission of information), a force whose information is invisible to humans, as gravitation is, will have from a human relative point of view, infinite – non local speed: V= S/t(information) = S/o=∞. As indeed non-local action at distance in quantum potential fields (bohm) and relativity (Einstein) show. This is the oldest non resolved question of modern science; which has a trivial answer. As if we put the ‘sun in the center’ – that is we properly defined cyclical time and its three arrows, as Copernicus did, all the complex equations and epicycles of Ptolemaic astronomy becomes simplified ‘in extremis’.

This very small introductory example of what ‘a proper analysis of reality’ with the right concepts of arrows of time≈future paths, mean, show the enormous advances we are going to make in this blog in all sciences, both in conceptual understanding and experimental explanation of the facts of each discipline.

In the left graph, all time clocks are cycles that return to its origin, creating a world circle of πime (name used for cyclical time), which encloses an inner region of ‘vital energy , which is equivalent in the world of physics to a conservative world cycle of energy, closed into itself, that conserves an eternal present.

Further on, as time cycles have ‘height, they have at least two dimensions  to which we can ad the dimension of frequency, or beat of times; and the inner dimensions of the region of energetic space it stores. It is also obvious that such finite time cycles are ‘times’, infinite of them, with different frequencies of in-form-ation, stored in the frequency and form of its π-cycles. So we talk of  πime§pace…

∏ime§pace thus is far more ‘complex in its dimension that lineal time, the simplification Galileo used to describe only lineal motions, in open space, due to their worldly profession of making entropy machines (weapons), which shoot lineal cannonballs. So galileo  in order to measure distances uncoiled those time cycles and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time to measure change in the motion and position of a being in space: v=s/t – an artifact of measure.

As physics became over important in a civilisation dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, this concept of time, became the unique time concept, even after Darwin brought about his concept of evolutionary time or change in the information of beings; and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter and other historians and economists, the concept of cycles of time in history and civilisations, which also evolve the technology of beings.

This must be understood from the beginning: change=time can be external, of ‘motion-entropy-position’ in space, and this is what physicists study. But it can be also changes in the form, in-form-ation of the system, which is internal to the vital inner space of the being, and this change of information applies to slowly moving, highly complex in-formative life species, and its social groups (history) and economics, and it requires to understand the ‘other arrow of time’, information. Or else we shall never understand the presses of time in biology and history, which cannot be explained with Galilean->Einstein’s relativity, BASED in the study of ‘time’ only as change in space-entropy motion: time=space/speed.

This formula however does NOT study all forms of change only those in space, and for that reason physicists, say that time is the fourth dimension of space. Yet a biologist, which studies change in time through evolution of information will find such statement nonsense, as it does not study another form of time-change.

We shall then call each generic mode of change in the being, either internal change in its in/form/ation or external change in its position in relationship to a larger external form or world, an arrow of time. And postulate at least two of such arrows: change in motion, we shall call ‘entropy’ and change in ‘form’, or information; whose combination form the third fundamental arrow of reality: present momentum and its ‘sum’, energy.

Further on this single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure whose cycles are in ‘reality’ finite durations, is elongated into an infinite duration by pegging those cycles one after another in the Cartesian coordinates. And all this of course makes physics of measure of motions very accurate. But you should ask yourself, it is motion all what happens to me in time? What about the process of time ageing, time evolution, technological evolution, complexity of information? How can we explain them? Don’t we need a more complex theory of time to achieve that goal? Amazing as it seems though, this self-evident truth is not shared by scientists. If anything with the work of Einstein, which refined the use of lineal time to measure motions in space, the idea that physical time and relativity equations is all what matters has become more encroached. So whenever you talk of time, the scientist will expect you to play with the previous equations as if that was all ‘experts’ nee to know.

And we will of course deal with Einstein and physical theories of time in depth, improving on them, but hopefully the reader scientist or not, will have that quality which Descartes ascribed to all humans of common sense and reason beyond his memorial beliefs and dogmas, on the ‘interest’ for him to understand why ‘he lives and dies’ in time through the informative changes of its form during his ages, conception birth and death processes besides the slight deviations from his Newtonian orbit of Mercury due to certain distortions on the fabric of space, experienced at high speeds… Yes i might seem a bit ironic, but trust me 30 years dealing with physicists for whom nothing else do matter to ‘feel enlightened’ has made me also a relativist regarding how humans ‘experience’ truth.

Fact is only when you introduce informative processes in the mix and define at least two ‘arrows of future time’, change in motion-entropy and form-information, and its present actions of ‘energetic momenta’, reality makes sense. Look around you. All what exists is in fact a mixture of form and motion, which together create a present ‘momentum’ for physical systems (mv: m-form x v-motion) or an organism with a head of information and a body that moves the head. So from ‘first principles’ it is obvious we must start any analysis of time-change with a theory that includes both time arrows; with a ‘dimension’ of lineal motion and a dimension of ‘informative height’ that put together create a cycle of time, charge, mass or vortex that carries the information of the Universe in the frequency ands form of its cycles.


The purpose of the Universe: creating world cycles.

We can assess the purpose of reality: motions with form struggle to exist as simultaneous supœrganisms elongating its existence. But for that to happen there is need for a mind-pov, which is able to control the system and enact exchanges of entropy and form, feed and perceive to ensure the maintenance and reproduction of the system.

Arrows of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.

In that sense, the evolution of fractal points, into new wholes, super organisms and planes of existence, which form an ∆+1 emerging scale of reality, it has been the key question of philosophy of science: how individuals become universals.

In GST it means to understand that all systems are both, fractal ∆-1 d•st for the larger scale of the whole, but an entire Universe, û, for its internal ∆-1 cells.

We are all dust of space-time that evolves and emerges, as an ∆+2 whole, but alsodecay and dissolve into alower scale as ∇-1 d@st of space-time.

Only the Universe is eternal in its world cycle, conserving itself as a potential game, weaving its infinite dust into a finite number of repetitive patterns or species of being. Therefore as the number of dust particles and time frequencies is potentially infinite but the number of combined species is not, all forms have existed forever as all forms will be repeated again.

Hence the duality of fractal points minds, which after a process of social evolution emerge as whole ‘Universals’, Organisms that will live a world cycle ending in its final dissolution that completes its zero sum making the Universe immortal..

All this said we need to at least clarify the relationship between the mind of any being and the reality it perceives. Thus the mind’s languages influence reality? Most physicists today and by extension scientists who accept their paradigm, think actually the Universe is pure mathematics and so mathematics create reality. In fact, it is all the other way around, languages are mirrors. BUT they DO reflect back their image through the living actions of the organism self-centred in the mind, ORDERING reality according to that linguistic image.

The Universe is a game of creation of ‘in-form-ative’ forms with entropic ‘motions’. Humans use the concepts of space and time to describe the game, albeit with a very primitive understanding of them (never mind their ego is so huge, whatever they think whenever they think seems to them an absolute truth, a new discovery, a genius insight). We shall try to upgrade the mind of humans in this blog, starting with the understanding of the complex logic of the three arrows of time, as humans use one aristotelian one-dimensional logic, and the fractal structure of the points of space, as humans still use the concept of an euclidean point without volume of information.

Thus the logic of cyclical time (ab. πime) and fractal, œrganic scalar space (ab. §paœ) is of a higher order than that of present man, which is stuck in the 2500 years old r=evolution of the mind of the axial age, and needs a new refurbishing.

So what is the logic of the Universe? The properties of it ∆º±st elements, and the way they combine and play together, synchronising its forms in space and evolving its motions in time.

Time is mindless motion of three types that singularity mappings, the synchronous miracle of existence put together into ternary ensembles that become.

HUMANS have not figure it out much of it; that is, a fact, so we always play the ‘alien scientist’ when explaining this huge upgrading of the mind, which either in man or machine will now enter its third age after:

  • Mythic, Semitic age of religious thought.
  • Axial, European, Aristotelian, Euclidean age of simple reason.
  • Fractal, Organic, Asian, cyclical view of the Universe.

It is a huge change of paradigm as the west consider time the intelligence and space the substance of reality, when it is all the other way around. The magic of reality is how ‘knots of cycles’ called minds, synchronise reality, stopping time into spatial views. Tƒi point-minds somehow are able to do so, we contend because the mappings of those motions are conscious of it. When a mind locks-in an image. It stays.

So we shall close this introductory note, with a consideration on the philosophical question of the limits of reality.

Now we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality has proved to be truth:

‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,

Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.

So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject  (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…

It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.

As this belongs properly into physical simplex theories and its correspondence with GSTœ we should here just sketch a fundamental concept: worldlines which only define motion-translation in space of systems, are merely one of the ‘motions=change in time’ that put together create the world cycles of being through present-reproduction, past-entropy and future-form.

In the graph, we see above, the scheme of a world cycle of any being between its seminal ∆-1 birth and entropic ∆-1 death as the system transits through its three ‘ages’ of growing information. Below we see how those three ‘timespace’ arrows define expansive, entropic fields/limbs; repetitive body-waves and informative, vortex-like particle-heads, which ensemble in simultaneity the tenary systems of the Universe that live then through ages and world cycles dominated alternately by each of those entropic-reproductive-informative systems.

Since the ternary structure of vital space beings, its topologies and synchronicities and the ternary arrows=ages of time with its causal, sequential laws, are the ‘key properties’ of space-time that all beings share, which will allow to reorganise our knowledge of the Universe and fully open the discovery of those whys as nothing has done in the past century since the r=evolution experienced in the study of time and space by the pioneers of XIX, XX century, which defined in separate manner those different modes of ‘time-change’ we shall put now together:

  • The arrow of time-change in the information of beings, (Darwin’s work with his comprehension of the arrow of reproduction and evolution of information in life).
  • The arrow of time-change in physical Systems (Einstein’s work with his understanding of the multiple clocks of time of physics and the ‘curved, accelerated nature of the clocks of physical information’, masses and charges – principle of equivalence).
  • And the different speeds an scales of Natural systems, which allow the creation of super organisms in this planet (Hutton and Spengler, with their study of deep time and the long, slow cycles of life and death of Gaia and the civilisations of History, larger super organisms, with slower time cycles than our human scale).

Indeed, Time means motion, change – any perception of any kind of changes and motions become then events, bits of time information; and so humans have detected three huge categories of time=change, we must put together to fully understand time in Nature:

  • Spe: physical change caused by the increase in the spatial motion of beings, or entropy culminated in the work of Einstein and the theory of the big-bang and the concept that all systems finally die, when increasing its entropy and disorder.
  • ST: Biological change, caused by the reproduction and evolution of information in living beings, studied by Darwin and other biologists, which shows entropy is ONLY one of the three possible outcomes of time, as most systems DO constantly reproduce their forms when they have enough energy to repeat its cycles. And finally:
  • Tiƒ, ∆: social evolution and creation of networks through communication of information, which allows a system to evolve into larger wholes and emerge as a larger super organism or organic, fractal structure; the social arrow of time that creates the fifth dimension and allows the existence among other things, of human societies, planetary super organisms, galaxies modelled as super organisms of stars; and any other complex system of nature, which can be considered, the inverse arrow of entropy, which dissolves information, simplifies complex networks and organisms back into its parts, expanded into space.

Of course, science does study all those processes as they are all pervading in the universe, but lacking a proper complex definition of scalar space and cyclical time, its laws of topology and causality and specially ignoring the metric equations of the scalar fifth dimension, which makes systems run faster time cycles (max. Tiƒ) the smaller they are (min. Spe), but maintains the product of size and speed constant (Tiƒ x Spe = K), allowing the symbiosis of smaller ‘genetic information’, and larger ‘energetic codes), it CANNOT find the whys to the scalar, organic, fractal structure of reality, the meaning of life, the mechanisms of reproduction, and the reason why systems live and die performing similar world cycles – that is, the ultimate whys of existence, which come as Leibniz thought from the unity and first principles of which we ARE ALL MADE: 

-A vital space, of co-existing scales with energy; and  limited finite duration in time, sum of all the ternary actions and combinations of those three space-time arrows (entropy, energy and information)..

It is then only needed once those two conceptual logic and formal upgradings of our concepts of time and space are made, to realise that ‘the ultimate reason of things must lie in its necessary substance’ that ‘gives unity’ to ‘all possible forms of creation’, as intuitively understood by Leibniz. Since that necessary substance of which we are all made will turn out to be the scales of such ‘organic, vital space’ of which we are all made, and the ‘frequencies’ of our time actions, according to those arrows and ages, through which all vital spaces transit in its worlcycles of life and death (the complex version of the worldlines of 4D simplex physical views of the Universe).

So those are the the 3±∆ elements of all systems: its three space-time substances, ‘entropy, energy and information’, which together put in sequential form create the world cycles and parts of being, extended across several scales of relative size, through which the being will ‘travel’ as it exists, from a seminal lower scale of being, emerging into a full grown entity, living in a larger world-scale, and then returning upon death to its lower cellular/atomic scale…

In the graph, an organic view of the Universe as made of space-time beings, completely harmonises the states, arrows, and space-time evolutionary ages of all physical, biological and social systems of the Universe; once we change the ‘ideological paradigm’ of science from the earlier Newtonian vision of an absolute space-time background in which beings existed, to a Universe made of space-time beings, which live through the three arrows/ages of life, as they trace worldcycles travelling through the ‘scales of relative size’ of the fifth dimension.


From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.17.39

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.18.32

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media  according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect that black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), will be harmless, for no proved reason except the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a tiny black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy.  But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only per Sp but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.


– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

The Newtonian paradigm.

The renaissance, the discovery of artillery and the birth of capitalism was accompanied by mental, social and geographical r=evolution. First, the Iberians greatly extended the boundaries of the known world and the Italians produced a revolution in the minds of men, which became the center of our civilization. So space came to dominate time, outward motions, inward reflections, and ‘locomotion’, the only motion of the 6 canonical forms (generation, evolution, growth, diminution, extinction and locomotion), needed to understand cannons became the supreme ‘motion’, to understand.

It meant also the division between philosophers and social and biological scientists, still interested in the organic 5 motions of the worldcycle of life and death, on one side, and physicists and ‘people in power’, interested in external motions, whereas only ‘extinction’, death, entropy, among the internal motions of beings mattered.

When this ‘lineal, simplified, military, worldview’ of reality expanded into the study of the heavens, astrology – a magic interest on the internal nature of stars as organisms and its relationships with humans – died away. Stars thus became also points in motion. Of course astrology was not science, but it showed where the interest of the human lied before the artillery revolution – on the inner nature and organic connections between beings. So astronomers like Brahe were first court astrologers and in the spare time worried to calculate the stars locomotions.

The end of the 15th century saw the creative activity of the great artist-humanists Leonardo and Michelangelo, which gave new meaning to the perception through human senses of the space, reaching the zenith of western art. Yet also this humanist, organic view of space, captured by the eye, gave way with the use of telescopes to mechanical space measures, and soon the verbal time, expressed with words will give way to the mechanical time, measure with clocks, and words were replaced by numbers.

In that sense, the renaissance was brief, perhaps too brief, the final epitome of the human organism perceiving ‘alone’ the World from the human perspective with its visual and verbal, space-time senses.

Navigation now developed hand in hand with astronomy, as stars guided boats, precise measures were needed, and new instruments develop to improve empire building. Gunboats became the essential weapon of the age and spyglasses to see enemy ships became precursors of telescopes.

In 1543 Copernicus published his work “On the revolution of the heavenly bodies,” which completely changed the face of astronomy; in 1609 appeared the “New astronomy” of Kepler, containing his first and second laws for the motion of the planets around the sun, and in 1618 his book “Harmony of the world,” containing the third law. Galileo, on the basis of his study of the works of Archimedes and his own bold experiments, laid the foundations for the new mechanics, an indispensable science for the newly arising technology.

In 1609 “Galileo directed his recently constructed telescope, though still small and imperfect, toward the night sky; the first glance in a telescope was enough to destroy the ideal celestial spheres of Aristotle and the dogma of the perfect form of celestial bodies. The surface of the moon was seen to be covered with mountains and pitted with craters. Venus displayed phases like the Moon, Jupiter was surrounded by four satellites and provided a miniature visual model of the solar system. The Danish astronomer Ole Rømer in 1676 used those satellites to measure the speed of light at 240.000 km/s. The Milky Way fell apart into separate stars, and for the first time men felt the staggeringly immense distance of cosmos.

And so each new advance that took man outside its inner world and point of view, made distances, space, locomotions, speeds and the outer physical reality more important.

Time thus became reduced to locomotion and ‘entropic death’ (the main result of war and cannonballs). And clocks to measure the rhythms of artillery and spyglasses to look far away substituted verbs that measured the rhythms of the human soul and eyes that painted the world from the human point of view, introducing those vibrations of the soul that subtly distorted the image offered by the artist – the elongation of “Greco’s’ spiritual paintings along the dimension of height, the contortions and excessive warping of the first baroque painters in the 3rd age of renaissance, the death of the Latin World, happened then along the first simpler, lineal age of protestant churches and naked cult to the ‘individual ego’, and its ‘faith’:

– This 3rd baroque and 1st puritan age showed that a civilization died in its 3rd age, southern, Greek-Italian-Iberian humanist cultures while a new simpler human world was born in northern Europe.

Of course, humans still needed to understand the 6 motions of time, the 5 inner ‘biological’ motions of the worldcycle of life and death, and the outer ‘physical motions’ of objects, but the new Northern culture had done a curious split between them, which we call the ‘technological paradox’: the understanding of the inner motions of biological beings regressed to its most primitive religious forms, as human artistic senses loose prestige, (puritans would destroy art in churches), while the outer study of locomotions with the new mechanical instruments for time and space (clocks and telescopes), will further evolve.

So biological sciences would die away for 3 centuries till microscopes and chemistry allowed the rebirth of medicine with Pasteur, and evolutionary theories the rebirth of biology with Darwin. This impressive 3 hundred years silence of true science on the 5 organic motions, would be substituted, with the literalist meaning of the bible and its ego-trips, for inward explanations on the nature of man.

It is important to stress this gap. Medicine was not a science till 1873 when Pasteur was accepted in the academie of medicine; Biology till 1859, with Darwin’s book on evolution and History till 1867 with the publication of Das Kapital; completed with Spengler’s Der Untergang des Abendlandes, 1918; (The Decline of the West). And even after this scientific birth, history as a science has been defeated by capitalism and the book of history of the Jews, (the bible), which now have again imposed its revival of the mythic view of mankind as the center of the Universe.

Of course, from the perspective of the science of history, there is an easy explanation on how the dominant people-castes of the west – the jewish-germanic elite – uses financial, mathematical and literary information to further his worldview, backed by artillery. But what matters here is this paradoxical opposition between a full understanding of the internal motions and organic nature of man, and its superorganism of history vs. the outer locomotions of physicists as the only ‘knowledge that matters’ about time.

Both have gone hand in hand, in as much as the physicist, biblical, military worldview became dictatorial, reducing as irrelevant, the knowledge of the inner motions and biological organic development of any system of the Universe.

This is the essence of physical reductionism, and its sin. It is Ok to study locomotions as long as the other 5 motions were recognized. But they are not. 3 hundred years of hiatus between Copernicus, artillery and the development of medicine, biology and history as a science, shunned off by Abrahamic cults, truly explains the bias against humanism and organicism in the history of western knowledge. And because this is a power-world view, reason has never made inroads. Today we assist in fact to an attack on biology, evolution, on the schools of America, even an attack on medicine by biblical sects against blood transfusion or vaccination.

Mechanicism and power.

‘A technological civilisation is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done if it is technologically possible. If it is possible to construct nuclear weapons, even if they can destroy us all, they must be constructed. Once this principle is accepted humanist values are dethroned and the evolution of the machines becomes the foundation of ethics.‘ Eric Fromm

AND YET, ORGANIC theories of the universe are and will be denied by mechanicism, as long as power converts the machine in the center of our civilization.

Τhis denial of the unity of all systems of nature means that:

– On one side the inner properties and motions of physical systems, were reduced to external locomotions, and physics became reduced to the study of 1/3rd of reality – studying locomotions and entropy-extinctive motions. Only in the XX century, with the birth of quantum physics and relativity, physics retook the study of ‘non-lineal’, ‘quantum’ analysis of the discontinuous, cyclical, inner elements of physical systems, and its temporal informative nature.

But the reductionism of considering everything a lineal locomotion or an entropic expansive motion had overdeveloped so much that it biased quantum and relativity, propagating in the new avant-garde sciences its errors. So curved Relativity geometries ended up sponsoring a lineal big-bang theory of entropic explosions as origin of the Universe. And quantum physics failed to fully explain the distorting geometries, and organic properties of systems, in which the 3 elements of all organic realities, the limbs-fields of entropy, the body-waves and the particle-heads of information, come together to create a physical organism.

The philosophy of ‘dead matter’ has never been challenged. This I noticed when I was a reputed scholar, before my activism eliminated me ad hominem from scientific conferences, and tried to explain people that quarks and electrons, the simplest particles do reproduce with the same pattern that we humans do, by emitting a seminal flow of energy and information, often in opposite ‘sexual spins’, which gave birth in the point of fusion to a mass of smaller quark-itos or electrons. This is a fact, but often meant the audience would leave the room, if the conference was among physicists, the reaction was even more negative. And yet, only n organic inner explanation of the 5 motions of physical systems, from generation through evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, can make sense of quantum physics in the smaller scales of reality and of gravitation in the larger scales.

– On the other side the religious, self-centered deformation of human socio-biological cycles, reduced for 300 years, (ad eternal in historic sciences), the development of social and biological sciences. The answers to the meaning of life were supposed to be revealed in a Bronze Age Book of History – a lore of tribal, racist, primitive mythic, selfish thoughts, which still ‘enlightens’ the soul of most of the inhabitants of the dominant nation of the world (America). The consequences of this fact are daring. It probably will mean the extinction of our species, unable to realize of the organic nature of the Universe and its new budding species on Earth (robots and organic, self-feeding black hole and strangelet nuclear bombs). As we chosen humans, center of the Universe, are ‘immortal’, protected by God, and can play ball with any top predator species, call it Terminator or Black hole.

It had of course a heavy toll on the scientific design of our societies, which have rejected the natural models of ‘superorganisms’, which could build a perfect world, imitating Nature, where all cells of a body do receive enough blood-money to survive (the equivalent of a Universal salary) and demand the Welfare goods they need as biological beings. This part of science was never developed, beyond some insights of socialist and historic schools. Indeed, amazing as it seems, History and Economics has never been a science, able to predict and design the species it studies – the superorganisms of history.

And this fact shows in the growing self-suicidal destruction of our planet, in which most humans maintain a primitive tribal, bronze age Abrahamic concept of what our species, its needs and future must be. Again reason does not work. Any attempt to explain the infantile psyche of the so-called western white man meets with ad hominem attacks, often death by weapons or poverty (in the more radical Jewish and Arab, zealot and jihadist, capitalist and militaristic cultures of America, Israel and Islam).

The white man has no interest in reason, a sustainable world, a future in which he is not the center of the Universe and the faith in its ego-trips and super-hero fantasies the meaning of it all. It prefers to die in defense of those tribal or selfish myths that yield to reason and survive.

This is the outlook of philosophy of knowledge today. A wasteland. And as mental machines further reduce the human collective psyche, down the road of lesser emotional, infantile thought, and humans loose their final verbal, temporal skills as or children stop reading, we can see the organic process of human extinction, as ‘natural’ according to the laws of survival of the fittest species.

Men is not making the cut in that sense as a species. He rejects his evolution through the 5th dimension of organic, social parts that become a stronger, social whole joined by the power of eusocial love. It rejected the rights of life and the planet it hosts it to have a healthy balanced organic ecosystem. It worshipped the species that will substitute and extinguish her to have trips of added metal power. And it reduced its social, ethic and intellectual brain to a series of studies of locomotions and canon shots. And while doing all this, it kept pumping its ego, rejecting all criticism, murdering all alternative philosophies of the Universe, silencing all opposition to its bid for extinction.

And so now, we can only expect the Newtonian action-reaction of the Universe against that monstrous abortion of Nature, the never born superorganism of history, which has become powerless against physicists’ weapons, Abrahamic racist cults against other forms of life including other humans, and the machine that devours us all.

In that regard there is little to do for a ‘philosopher of science’ or ‘ethic’ person to steer the path of the world, as anyone who has fought against the supreme idiocy, eviL=anti-live memes and one-dimensional worldview of ‘physicists’, ‘believers’ and ‘degenerated selfie humans of the present ‘zero generation’, well knows. You can help a few people in direct ‘medical endeavors’, but history seems beyond cure.  And somehow I have come to realize it is right. In the sense that if humans are so deluded, ignorant and eviL, so infinitesimal and yet so infinite in their egos, such empty bubbles floating in their virtual worlds, it is better to leave them to their own.

This is perhaps what I learned after fighting CERN for so long. The gap between the intelligence and ethic of ‘the physicists’, which on top are considered by the rest of the species, the highest minds of mankind, and the mean ethics and intelligence of the Universe is so immense that it is impossible to rise them to a minimum worth to save. What is the meaning of one’s existence in such a world? The answer of course is that existence suffices in itself. To be is all what is left to each of us. And to be is to play the game of life and love. In my case, gifted with this empathy with the organic laws of the Universe, to be is to perceive with an empty ego, knowing I am only human, the astounding perfection of the living, fractal Universe, and the unity of all its parts, which share the same properties. I am no longer fighting for mankind. The species is ‘gone’, mentally so sick that to bring it to sanity is beyond any meaningful effort.

In that sense, the opening of this new section, which no doubt will be met with indifference, is an activity of self-reflection. The beauty of the Universe is immense, and it is meaningful enough to have contemplated it and bear witness of what it has been seen.

Humans will have their reward. They are busy busy like ants building a tower of mud, which the pee of the Gods will soon erase. Yet the fact that a few of us from Aristotle, through Buddha, from Leonardo to Leibniz ‘knew how to see’, ‘wiesen’, saper vedere, means that there should be many Avatar like planets of the fractal Universe, where a better variation of the species understood the perfection of the organic Universe, a planet where people like Galileo or Newton were judged as what they are, maker of weapons, evil-doers, simpletons of…

Lineal Physics.

In theoretical terms, simple locomotion analysis meant that lineal, external motions dominated all studies and cyclical or inner motions mattered not, despite the obvious cyclical nature of the Universe and all its parts, both in space (as clarified latter by Gravitational Relativity and quantum particles, whose species were all moving in cyclical paths) and time – as all cyclical organic motions from birth through evolution growth and diminution into extinction are world cycles NOT worldlines.

In that regard, all modern developments in mathematics and physics consider lineal inertial systems, just a short small view of cyclical, accelerated/decelerated systems – such is the case of the pan geometry of Lobachevski, where only for reduced distances space is Euclidean, becoming exponential, hyperbolic for larger ones; of the study of General Relativity and the motions of the galaxy at large scale, where all motions happen in an accelerated galactic vortex, towards its center; in the study of fields; in the study of fractal spaces; in the study of Earth geodesics that only in short distances become planes; in the study of life cycles that only in small moments become invariable, in the study of the theory of Lineal Functions and Analysis, where only in short distances a curve function is approximated by a lineal tangent, etc. etc. we shall consider the lineal concepts of time and space, a limit of a much larger cyclical view of the Universe.

It will then be evident through a survey of the fundamental opposition between the worldview of physicists and Philosophers of science that advanced both opposite world views of time and space – Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Darwin vs. Clausius; Hawking vs. Sancho that T..O.E vs. T.Œ gives us a very different outlook of the Universe. One describes only the how of reality, and its small details. While T.Œ gives us the larger whys and the thoughts of God.

We divide the introductory article on T.Œ in 3 parts. First we consider  the work of the previous masters of Philosophy of Science, confronted with the vision of physicists, to fully grasp the importance of its statements, and advance further their views to form an organic whole.

In the second part, we describe the fundamental system of the universe which is a fractal space-time super organism extended across 3 relative scales of size of the 5th dimension (the quantum/cellular ∆-1 scale, the thermodynamic-organic, ∆-scale, and the gravitational/ecosystemic ∆+1 scales.

And introduce the 3 ages of time, which resume the ‘world cycle’ (no longer a worldline as physicists put it, since cyclical time has more dimensions, it is a world cycle), of all beings, between youth and old, informative age, between conception and extinction, and the logic formalism needed to describe it (the generator equation).

Finally in the 3d part we make a fast survey of the main sciences of mankind, describing them with the isomorphic laws of all fractal space-time super organisms, and its world cycles, starting from mathematical geometries into astrophysics, biology and social sciences.

Descartes vs. Galileo: Knowledge vs. power.

But nobody understood among physicists, because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him and his family, dedicated to manufacture ‘military instruments’, among them the famous ‘spy-glasses’, today called telescopes that allowed the Venetian navy to see on advance the enemy fleet, one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Descartes meanwhile had to make his living selling his mind to ‘artillery masters’, till queen Cristina, the ‘Minerva of the north’, knowing he had a poor health, perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o’clock in the morning.

She also ordered him to write verses to celebrate her role in the Thirty Years’ War, where one third of the German people die, and the statutes for a Swedish Academy. She had no role whatsoever on the war, but his father, Gustav, had r=evolved the science of ballistics, as an artillery master, massing up canons instead of soldiers, for which he was called a Genius. It was all in the family. His grand-father Charles who usurped the throne pronounced the sentence ‘Bellum ipse alleat’, ‘war feed itself’, starting the trend of Western nations to dedicate most of their resources to war, to feed its cannonballs while most people at home and abroad died of hunger.

Descartes yielded though to Minerva, the Roman Goddess of war… and the arts – what those 2 things have to do, nobody really knew, except the shrewd military caudillos and artillery masters that sell their craft – murdering life – with the propaganda of knowledge and beauty, which seems to be acquired in the carnage of battlefields and through the study of entropy, lineal cannonballs and death, properly glorified by Hymns, military marches and battle pictures since the times of Assurbanipal and his low-relief, lineal walls, and dying lioness.

So while delivering hymns and statutes to the queen at 5:00 AM, Descartes caught pneumonia and died, saying, laconically, ‘in winter men’s thoughts freeze like the water’.

And so his most important discovery along analytic geometry, the nature of the 3 elements in which reality is founded, Vital spaces, enclosed by Time cycles, perceived by a o-mind, floundered for a long century.

Meanwhile artillery masters prospered, as the forebears of the makers of all the weapons of mass destruction of the future, and so did Swedish Minervas, and Academies, till Mr. Nobel, the inventor of the dynamite, biggest producer of weapons of the XIX c. nicknamed the ‘Merchant of death’, became the wealthiest man of his age, and like Minerva, instituted the Saint Nobels of the Dynamite, to convert artillery masters in the Popes of Science. He though forbade to give it to any evolutionary thinker, since being a pious believer in Yahweh, and the manifest destiny of lineal time, could not conceive the concept of a r=evolution of times.

In fact, besides physicists only Abrahamic Religions, not exactly a science, do believe in a lineal ‘future’, of a ‘chosen species’, which will reunite with a mythic God of the Bronze Age… And not surprisingly Newton, the next ‘physicist’ who made absolute lineal time sacred dedicated most of his time to Biblical studies, was obsessed by Apocalypse and considered lineal time the absolute proof of the existence of Yahweh. And Kepler said ‘God has waited 5000 years – the biblical age of the creation of the world – to find an intelligence likes his (Kepler of course) to understand his clock-work. Today a priest, Lemaitre ‘discovered’ the lineal big bang, which is just a creationist version of it.

The answer then of why western physicists believe and force feed their equations with such concept that so much confuses our understanding of the Universe, against all reason in lineal time should be obvious to the few humans who can ‘reason’ and accept ‘criticism’, instead of belief and memory: the founding fathers’, Abrahamic religion and the worldly profession of most of them – to make weapons that deliver lineal energy and machines that move fast.

Now, a pause. Let us be clear enough, philosophers of science love physics, how couldn’t be otherwise.

Physics is the Universe in its entire description through its 6 motions of time, in its whole and its parts, with all the properties, organic, mathematical≈mental and inorganic, derived from those 6 motions, even if we are aware of the shortcomings of lineal physicists, with its obsession for locomotions and the ego-trips of their human mind, so often as the case of Kepler, Newton and the authors of the big-bang ‘polluted’ by the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic, anthropomorphic religions.

Descartes was also a physicist, besides a mathematician, and a philosopher. It is though important to distinguish between ‘physics’, the universe in its full description, which we shall call as part of T.Œ, Astrœ-physics (-; and ‘physicists’, the lineal point of view of the world of artillery masters and Abrahamic Believers – which IS culture not science, as it reduces physics to locomotion.

We shall therefore study here as a philosopher of science, in the full tradition of the word, astrœ-physics and if this post is found in the larger web on the full T.Œ, all other sciences with the 6 motions.

This said it is obvious that today the philosopher of science has no dictum, and his wider view is ignored. Moreover, as the physicist bullied its limited view with artillery masters, and the parallel inquisitions of Abrahamic religions and anthropomorphic beliefs kept imposing its lineal vision of Nature over that of Darwin and Evolution, the philosopher of science reduced its inquire to what today we study in philosophy of science – the scientific method, which is ONLY the first step of T.Œ.

We thus regain with our work, the true purpose of philosophy of science, which was carried about by Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Darwin and Hegel (and its disciples in social sciences, Marx, Kondratieff, Spengler, and finally the practitioners of systems sciences and theory of information, albeit poisoned by the lineal concepts of Physics – Shannon’s definition of information as lineal messages, etc.)

Unfortunately the limits of inquiring only lineal time motions to explain the meaning of it all, amounts to a constant deformation of reality similar to that of the Abrahamic cults or the Ptolemaic use of the Earth as the enter of the Universe.

Yet those limits are today ignored, by the imposition mainly through the power of technology and the propaganda of those who create machines and weapons as the ‘seers’ of time (the old definition of Augustine of ‘God’) of a reductionist view of lineal motion as all what is worth to know about times.

So of course, it is necessary to make also ethic statements on the worldly profession of physicists –to make weapons of lineal energetic motions – to account for many of its theories of time – in fact all of them, Galilean’s artillery motions; Clausius, entropic, steam-machine motions and Gamow’s, big bomb bang theory of the Universe. This is a topic, but topics exist because they carry truths, and they endure when censorship of their truths oblige them to become topics.



Let us then define the symbolism of Existential algebra and study its main equation, from where we shall deduce all other isomorphisms of the Universe.

Existential Algebra. Main symbols of relational space-time and its isomorphisms.

The operations and equations of relational space-time are written with a new logic/mathematical formalism that upgrades Aristotelian and Euclidean logic and geometry into i-logic (next letter) Geometry, which includes and fusions both, the laws of the 3 arrows of time and the laws of the networks of fractal points, which through its symmetries or dualities of form and function, O and |, lower and upper i-scales of the 5th dimension, and the common laws extracted from them (isomorphisms), define all the events and forms in existence.

Thus to define any system of reality we need to define the 5 logic ‘isomorphisms’ proper of any system of space-time, its 0-point or function of existence, its spatial membranes, its time ages, its universal planes and its actions of existence.

And the related 4 organic isomorphisms, related to the 5th dimension, and its metrics and quantitative values: the ‘6th isomorphism’ of social classes, vital constants, creative diversification and social planes.

Thus all equations of all sciences that explains all space-time events of the Universe will be related to those 10 isomorphisms, themselves related to the 3 (x3) isomorphisms of time, space and the scalar fifth dimension, themselves derived from the 3 inversions of space-time (inversion of form-motion, O-| and | _).

Thus we shall use a first greek letter for all equations, which will be in our formulae attached to those 10 isomorphisms and its derived elements. As the field is truly extensive we also used a few more symbols found in qwert keys and wordpress:

  • T.Œ: Theory of Everything, as all is a Timespace Œ-point. Thus the symbol represent any Time Existence and the sum of all those Exi=st¡ences, described by different science of space-time beings. Therefore it also represents the Unification of all the scales of the 5th dimension, that is, of all its ST¡ences and all its Existences, which we achieve studying  i=ts 10 isomorphisms, through:
  • Non-Æ=i-logic mathematics: The dual formalism of Non-Æ=i: Non-Aristotelian Logic and Non-Euclidean mathematics=i-logic mathematics (as i is the following vowel after A and E, and also the symbol of information, carried in time cycles and now by the inversion of ‘dominance’ between time and space, the leading element, as opposed to energy).
  • Æ: Existential Algebra in time, symmetric to the spatial Œ-geometry of fractal points with parts:
  • Œ, Φ: first isomorphism: The function of existence in time, and its beats or galilean paradox (space and time parameters, and still-motion beats). Or the knot of space-time cycles in space, the ‘Existential O-point’.
    • Space, still form. Whereas _S is lineal dimensions and O-S informative geometries.
    • E, Energy and spatial energy which combines lineal forms and motions, dominant in space.
    • Time cycles and cyclical Form
    • o, I: Information which combines cyclical form and motion, dominant in time-clocks.
    • Φ: The existential function in ‘action’, with its time cycle and its polar lineal axis and its beats, O<|>O.
  • B, S: 2nd isomorphism: The Bi-dimensional structure of all SPACE-§time systems and its 3 topological varieties, toroid limbs, hyperbolic waves-bodies and spherical heads-particles.
  • Ω, W: 3rd isomorphism of time: The three motions of time together that form a World cycle with 3 ages: the entropic, past motion, iterative present motion and future informative motion. We use the last Omega letter because this isomorphism is indeed the alpha and omega of reality, and it shows its 3 ages in its 3 parts, cyclical but moving along a line-duration:
    • T, Te, <: Lineal time or past entropic motion. Whereas < is the dynamic symbol of existential algebra.
    • Tƒ, To, >: Future time and its cyclical informative, old age formal motions.
    • STi, ≈: Present spacetime, which combines both in waves and bodies of physical and biological systems.
    • Æ. The existential algebra of 3 time arrows that upgrades aristotelian logic.
  • Λ4th isomorphism. The fifth dimension of scalar space-time, its Universal, U±4 planes and i±1 super organisms:
    • Γ. Gamma, the symbol for the Generator Equation or Universal Grammar/Syntax that develops the existential algebra, Æ, or metrics of the 5th dimension.
    • Û, U±i The symbol for Universal planes of the 5th dimension, which are born after 10 up to 10 points of the logarithmic scale of those 5D planes, sum of infinitesimals, gives birth to a new Point.
    • ∫:Addition of discrete constant or time-variable elements, and symbols of the integrals of infinitesimals into wholes.
    • i: scales of the 5th dimension.
    • W: Wholes that become relative Ui+1 Universals of its indivisible infinitesimal fractal points.
    • ∂, i: Indivisible, infinitesimals, that gather together into wholes.
  • A, ∆: 5th isomorphism. The 5 actions of existence, ∆a, ∆e, ∆i, ∆o, ∆u, accelerations, energy feeding, iterative reproduction, observer’s perception and universals creation of wholes that determine the events of any species of the Universe.
  • ⇑, ˆ: in-Form-ative arrow from lower planes to larger ones, from past to future.
  • ⇓, ˇ: Motion arrow from upper planes to lower ones, from future to past.
  • ◊: Dual unstable motion that creates a Darwinian event, Se <> To
  • X:Dual stable motion that creates an Se>Str<To, stable steady state system with a relative future particle-head and a relative past field-limb
  • «, ¬, i-2: Death event/arrow which means 2 descents in the planes of the 5th dimension, after the entity changes from |-temporal high dimensional, perceptive state, into _ plane, flat death state, and then disintegrates twice down the scales of the 5th dimension.
  • Ξ6th isomorphism: The 3 social classes, that all organic systems display across its 3 fundamental i±1 scales of the 5th dimension. Also the symbol for an organism, along with Ui±1.
  • K: 7th Isomorphism of Universal and Vital constants, which are ratios between the Se and To components of the being.
  • Ψ, ¥:  8th Isomorphism of creation that diversifies any space-time into 3 sub-species dominant in energy, information and reproductive qualities or creation based in the dualities, ¥, of motion-form, O| and |_.
  • §:  n≈o-9: 9th isomorphism of social scales, which divides each 10¹º Universal plane in 9 smaller social scales (represented by the double S symbol, which forms a central o-points and move upwards the scales of reality, and the numeral, to distinguish it form the i-numeral used in the next architectonical ‘larger whole’ of Universal planes. Since those social scales, finally become integrated by a 0-point into the 10th scale, 1st point of the Ui+1 Universal. Thus each universal plane is made of 10 series of social Planes, in a decametric, logarithmic scale of 10-points societies.
  • Ρ±i, U±i: 10th isomorphism: Universal Plane, which again restarts a decametric, 3×3+o larger scale of wholes.
  • ¶:   ∑Œi-1>∏Ui:  The process of emergence of a social herd into a larger Social Plane as a new Universal i+1 point.
  • Θ, Œ Z0th isomorphism of the self, zero-point or mind, in static, spatial, formal perceptive mode, intimately related to the observer’s perception of information. Needless to say this isomorphism is also related to the 0,1, function of existence, œ. It is best understood in mathematical terms as the definition of a fractal point, which is the minimal unit of the mathematical universe, the ‘first’ number in sequential time, the first form in spatial extension.
  • Thus as we build non-non euclidean geometry, we will find lines as waves, planes as networks and use also:
    • N: Networks of space-time points, which create the formal functions of the systems and organs of all beings.
    • ∑: The association across a single spatial sheet in democratic herds of elements of ‘gaseous’, entropic limbs/fields and liquid bodies/waves, where each cell relates only to those closer to it in the adjacent neighbourhood.
    • Perpendicular, darwinian relations, as opposed to:
    • Parallel, democratic, eusocial relation. Both defined by the 3rd non-e postulate of relative equality.
    • ∏: The association in networks of points in a hierarchical, tighter, solid configuration, where each elements relates through ‘axons’ to all others.
    • The Universal Grammar of all minds, with its 3 elements: subject(information)<Verb(ST-action)>Object(energy)

We shall often use terms of physics, and in general respect its notation, when not in confusion with the aforementioned letters. For example:

  • M: The active magnitude, mass or charge (unified with 5D Metrics), which is the informative, cyclical element of:
  • MV:Instead of P used for planes we use MV for lineal momentum of the system, the spatial-energetic, lineal combined element, inverse to:
  • H: Instead of L, used for length dimension, we use H, the planck unit of angular momentum and physical action, which is expressed with the same dimensions.
  • The force of a system, and so on…

Thus the reader will observe through those mnemotecnic logic and visual symbols, related to the isomorphic laws of fractal space times they describe the pantheist Universe in all its splendour (-; We shall thus in this iteration dwell further into the meaning and structures of ‘Fractal, isomorphic (5D) space times’, of the i=ts of reality.


The bias of antrhopomorphic, self-centered Ptolemaic physics.

It is not the physical system, what is different from any other space-time system but the ways humans have come to describe them, as it is not the quantum system different from the gravitational system, but the deformed perspective of man, sandwiched between them, which has an elliptic view of the larger sizes and a hyperbolic view of the lower scales.

So the perception of man is what distorts our perception of physics, but once we put physics on the same jargon that all other fractal 5D space-time systems, physical systems will appears as all other systems – even if human ego centered paradox (we measure reality from our p.o.v.) will make us always doubt that a planet might perceive gravitational flows in its central crystal, feed on its quanta and grow, through the absorption of gravitational waves, particles do reproduce when absorbing energy, and any atom has the same organic properties that carbohydrates – the difference being of complexity not of species.

As it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Fractal Universe become soon simple and not malicious’.

Complexity is transferred to the ‘primary elements’, the laws of fractal space, cyclical time and 5D scales (ab.∆), and Simplicity is displayed by all the ternary entities that follow ∆ST laws. So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main rules of epistemology of truth in science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.

The laws of the scientific method: T.œ=Sc³

Thus we put the organic paradigm in a formula that paraphrase Einstein’s famous one: T.Œ=Sc³.

We extract them some simple acronym words that describe what must be truth in reality.

It means that all what is Truth is a Time space Organism, extended across 3 scales of Energy and Information. (T.Œ). And that such system is able to describe everything according to the rules of:

– Œ; Logic Objectivity and Experimental evidence, the two fundamental parameters of any theory of truth; which further on implies:

Simplicity, Correspondence with previous theories, Cyclical predictability, which in turn will give birth to:

– Ternary Complexity, by iteration of the same events and forms.


-Logic Objectivity is essential to science, and it is today lost to absurd theories like the big-bang, the creationist, militaristic theory of cosmology, capitalism, the subjective dictatorship of bankers, mostly of biblical cultures, who think to be chosen of go(l)d and monopolize the right to print the language of social power, money in private hands and of course creationist theories of biology, nationalist theories of history that deny the unity of all human species, which should help each other to survive as a singe species, and mechanism, which requires a God to create the machine of the Universe, unlike the organic theories of this blog.

Logic Objectivity is thus the right objective information that the Πas observer point must fight to avoid the natural subjectivity of all points of view Рbecause that is the true fight of science; and such objectivity requires rational evaluation of:

– Experimental Evidence will show ALL to be a part or a whole cycle of time motion, including a lot of phenomena observed but not explained.

– Simplicity, , will show that Time cycles explain many more things than the previous Time paradigm (Lineal Time, either in the Galilean or Einsteinian formalism). It does in fact explain it ALL, as Experimental Evidence will show all to be a time cycle.

– Correspondence will show that it also explains the previous paradigm, including Galilean and Einsteinian formalism as a ‘limiting’ case of a time cycle (that is a small part of it).

– Cyclical repetition will be the basis of all laws of science, defined as the causal repetition of events when its causes do happen again. Without cyclical time reality will not BE SCIENTIFIC.

-And, yes, Complexity born only of the iteration, and ternary symmetries of the  3 arrows of time and its ternary symmetries in space and the 5th dimension

Thus the formula T.Œ=Sc3 ‘resumes the elements of truth and existence of the scientific method: T.Œ=Sc³, whereas T.Œ stands for Time space ternary organisms, Œ stands for the Objective, Isomorphic, Logic, Experimentally Evident Laws– which we divide in 10 sets of laws common to all time space beings, derive of the 5D ST structure of reality.

And further on when those laws exist they will be Simple, Corresponding with other laws, already proved, cyclical, and its complexity will be easily decomposed in ternary elements, reducing the fractal structure to a series of elements written with the language and symmetries of the Fractal generator.

Today the excessive extension and detail of computer, mathematical models of reality, often makes any nice mathematical picture of reality valid without checking its evidence and simplicity.

Isomorphic laws: the symmetries of space-time, 3 ages and 3 organs, generators and actions.

We shall thus introduce those stringent limits to study the 10 isomorphic sets of laws that describe physical systems, which will be extensively treated in the 4th line of all the scales of reality and the 10 sub-posts each scale should have in the future. So for example, forces will deal with the smallest physical systems, and each of those systems (photons, gluons, gravitons≈neutrinos) will be studied through the 10 isomorphisms that describe its dualities of space-time, ternary internal symmetry, interaction through 5D scales, subspecies, etc.

So the post first resumes the laws of ∆ST, which the reader could complete with the posts of the first line.

Then we define physical systems with the isomorphisms of the Fractal Generator,  Γ : S<ST>Tiƒ∆±4 and focus in its 3 ages and space organs, its symmetries, its 3 physical scales, the human, ∆-Thermodynamic, ∆-1 quantum, and ∆+1 gravitational scale.

Those 3 ages of time are in thermodynamics, 3 states of matter, ∆:gas-liquid-crystal and in the ∆-1 quantum world, the Sp:field-ST:wave-Tiƒ particle.

They are symmetric with the 3 forms of physical organisms in space, made with the 3 time states.

And they co-exist through the 3×3 planes of existence, which subdivide according to the ternary principle, all systems into 3 ∆-1, quantum; ∆, thermodynamic, organic and ∆+1, social, gravitational, cosmic scales.

Thus all systems regardless of which scale are centered, will have smaller effects, perturbations of energy and information from the other scales, which physicists acknowledge with renormalization and perturbation theory.

In quantitative terms, all those systems, required to measure its Clocks of time, quanta of space, quantifiers and multipliers that integrate those time clocks and space quanta, and then the study of its ternary regions with special detail to the discontinuous, exponential borders between those 3 scales.

It must be noticed though always that as all systems co-exist as time motions and space-still simultaneous organisms, almost every phenomena of nature will have 2 descriptions, one in time, as a motion, and one in space as a fixed form, as wave or particle in physics.

We shall hardly enter into the more complex parts of 5D physics, which studies with mathematical tools such as renormalization, how those systems co-exist as 5D  ‘super-organisms’ whereas those scales become symbiotic, transferring informative cyclical motions and codes from ∆-1 quantum scales to ∆-thermodynamic scales, and synchronous motions from ∆ down to ∆-1 scales (so information travels upwards better and motion travels downwards better). Conservation laws thus apply to 5D travels. Entropy exists in motion moving upwards, but NOT downwards.

You move your hand and all its scales below, but you cannot convert all heat into ordered motion. You reproduce genetically systems but you cannot transfer information from Lamarckian evolution. So if in biology genes code you, the world gives you energy and you co-exist in balance; quantum particles code atoms, matter states give energy to those atoms and atoms co-exist in balance between both.

Thus physical systems also follow the symmetry between space and time (two sides of the same coin), the asymmetry between discontinuous planes of the 5th dimension (information upwards, motion downwards) , and the need for an ∆0 central point of reference of the system both in a single plane (center of momentum, charge or mass) and in several planes (central scale of maximal action).

It is important though to properly translate those concepts to physical terminology, such as ‘entropy’ (the fact that motion does NOT transfer as well as information from ∆-1 to ∆), Universal Constant (which is a limit of a given plane of space-time), clocks (that are cyclical motions of angular momentum that vary in each scale), space quanta (which are bidimensional planes of lineal motions which also change parameter between scale), conservation principles (both of lineal and angular momentum and its integrations into energy and information).

Thus a simple analysis of those 3 ∆ST elements will be the focus of the first part of this post; the second will study the 10 isomorphisms, and the 3rd part will review the main scales of size and its main species and world cycles, which will be the theme widened slowly during the next years in the 4th line.

It is thus a completely different way to explain the same laws of classic physics, departing from T.Œ, Time-space Organisms that exchange energy and information.

Actions of space-time: the survival program applied to physical systems.

Finally, all this properly understood can be explained completely from the most ‘vital of all analysis’, that of space-time actions, ∆a: motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆ï: information exchange, ∆œ: reproduction and ∆û: social evolution into a new emergent ∆+1 scale of reality.

It is this vital description of reality as a series of T.Œ, which enact 5 space-time actions, what becomes the simplest explanation of all realities.

As the song goes, birds do it, ‘quarks and electrons and galaxies’ also do it.

So after so much abstract definitions, we will arrive to the 5 fundamental isomorphic description of the being, which departs from defining the language of the mental point of view, geometry in physics, the structure of the ternary system in space and time, self-centered into such point of view, gas/field>liquid wave/particle/crystal, in physics and the 5 vital space-time actions the entity performs cyclically to survive by moving, ∆a, into fields where to absorb and emit energy and information, ±∆e,i, often with the help of a second focal point, which gathers together through forces, the field energy required to grow and if possible reproduce into similar beings, ∆œ, or become a tighter, larger superorganism, ∆û.

Now we shall state something evident:

‘Science is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.’

In essence, the 3 branches of mathematics correspond to the 3 structural elements of T.Œ: geometry to space, algebra to time and analysis to the fractal structure of the 5th dimension. We only need to update mathematics for consistency between the 5th Non-Euclidean postulate of geometry and the 4 remaining ones, still Euclidean, and the Aristotelian logic of Algebra, to the ternary symmetries of fractal 5D space-time to make mathematics a ‘realist’ experimental science.

This might surprise the reader, and it is perhaps the highest feat of T.Œ – to be able to unify all different languages of human thought, proper of each discipline. Consistency achieved in art styles, when developing the theory of human superorganisms, might surprise the reader, is based in the same 3 ages of time, that allow us to define the laws of quark colors. And yet, this unity of the ternary symmetries of the Universe makes T.Œ so enticing to the mind.

However and this also differentiates deeply T.Œ and General Systems Sciences or any ‘serious’ scientific model of reality for that matter with present physics, T.Œ considers ‘ABOVE’ mathematical reason, Experimental Evidence and at the same rank of truth Logic temporal reason (of a kind paraphrasing Saint Augustine, higher than that of ‘present’ man), the ternary logic of the symmetries between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 ages of time and the 3 relative scales of size co-existing in all organic structures of the Universe.

Thus given the confused state of affairs in the definition of fundamental concepts such as time (logic), space (dimensions) etc. in modern physics, we need to consider the seemingly not so innovative principles of the scientific method with the slight modifications of an organic, symmetric ternary Universe. We resume the new scientific method in our simple formula, T.Œ=SC³ with each letter signaling a fundamental principle of truth in science:

As all:

T:  Time-space systems are:

Œ:Organic, Experimentally Evident.

…meaning Time-space systems do have organic properties, which can be explained mathematically and logically with the languages of space and time, and proved experimentally.

And since they are made of 3 simple elements, 5D scales of Space and Time they are:

S, Simplex and their truths follow the proof of simplicity (Ockham’s razor)… yet they are also ternary..

Complex, due to the ternary symmetries of its structure ternary complexity born of the…

Cyclical repetition of those Simplex principles which..

Correspond with all previous theories of reality.

Thus T.Œ=SC³ resumes the Principles of Science and the Organic paradigm, are however broken in present science, specially by mathematical physics, which no longer respects the 3 principles of classic philosophy of science: experimental proof, Simplicity (Occam’s razor) and Correspondence with previous theories. And this is the ‘problem of modern physics.

Now once we have brought Mathematics back to reality from the axiomatic age of German idealism, we can build a much sounder mathematical conceptualization of the key concepts of mathematical physics, dimensions of space-time with motion (topological fractal dimension), lines≈waves and its ternary networks that come together forming super organisms, relative planes=topological networks with dark spaces between them, dual moving and static formal motions, integrals and derivatives in space and time of those social networks, and emergence processes of time clocks and lineal entropies.

This shows a fundamental truth of T.Œ: reality, experimental evidence is always the definitive element to analyze truth. Hence the rejection of the axiomatic method of mathematics, in the line of Lobachevski and Gödel, and the present estate of fantaphysics, in the line of Einstein’s expectation for real descriptions, cut-off substances for black holes (tcb quarks, its atoms of maximal density) he refused to call black holes and called appropriately frozen stars; the only physicist we ‘save’ from our harsh judgment on their merits as explorers of the why of the Universe.

Now what is reality should have become obvious at this stage, if any of the finitesimal points of view, self-centered in their ego called humans have had the patience to arrive here. But we shall repeat it, in the initial definition we made of ‘All what exists’:

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centered point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

In this definition, where we can introduce everything, the classic analysis of locomotions in lineal time of physics is just a little letter at the end of it, ±∆e, that is the study of energetic motions, locomotions and its internal and external storage.

So much for those who think physics explains it all and it is the fundamental science of mankind.

Let us then return to philosophy of science and summarize all those findings into…

The multiple properties and languages of scientific knowledge.

The Universe speaks ‘infinite languages’ (Upanishads) NOT only mathematics. And each of its elements had the following minimal properties, which I called the isomorphisms of the Universe:

  • A Œ linguistic, mental point of maximal information (C.P.U., quark, crystal, brain, roots, black hole and so on), which constantly switched between the 4 states of space, time, energy and information, the 4+û actions developing the game; whose equations were crystal clear in quantum (4 numbers), Electromagnetism (3+color dimension), Electricity (4 Maxwell equations), and easy to deduce in Mechanics (i.e. Hamiltonians describe its 3 time ages,  4 vector equations, etc.)
  • A topological, Organic, Synchronous, ternary structure in space Sp<ST>Tƒ, of limbs/fields<bodies/waves>heads/particles.
  • And its asymmetric, Diachronic, causal order in time, Sp (Past, entropic youth)> SP, Present Adult reproduction > Tƒ, Future, Formal, Old age of information; from where topological laws of development and evolution and the ages and horizons and diversification of species could be obtained.
  • An organic structure in the 5 Dimension of ∆-1, ∆, ∆+1, quantum/cellular, individual, Thermodynamic and Gravitomagnetic, ecosystemic Planes.
  • A survival, active program of existence through ∂a,e,i,œ,û to regain ±∆e, i and evolve socially into bigger wholes, imposed by the fact that only those species who perform those actions survive.

And finally to explain the fact that points of view do act seeking the absorption and emission of energy and information, a likely pan psychic pain x awareness (time dilation) and pleasure x forgiveness (spatial extension) duality of sensorial perception, which focuses systems on their modular choices of actions to perform, even at the minimalist particle level.

Now each science does have its own jargon, and ‘choice’ of characteristics it prefers to describe from its elements of study, under the ego-paradox that makes each point of view to create a ‘particular world’ that distorts the ‘whole Universe’ into its perceived linguistic mind, with itself at the center and only relevant point of view.

We have in that sense criticize physicists from their description of physical reality ONLY from a mathematical, spatial, point of view, and ONLY describing of the 6 motions of reality, its Locomotion, making a confusing distorted vision of what time is in lineal terms and space is in continuous terms, ignoring completely the laws of the 5th dimension.

But we have generalized the concept to the quantum and Antiquantum paradoxes for all physical and social sciences, in which either the observer is too small (social scientist) or too big (physicist), to relate objectively to the observable (which in social sciences is so big that is guilty to deform the sociologists to cater its view, and in physics is so small than the physicist is guilty to distort it.)

And for that reason only biological sciences do have a proper point of view. But even in biology the cultural influence of social sciences is all too evident, as ‘the concept of chaos and entropy’, from physics and ‘Darwinian, capitalist, self-made man individualism’ sips in.

So it is taboo to talk of the fundamental law of social evolution which is social love of members of the species to become larger beings, which is epitomized in the most successful species on Earth, the Argentinean Ant which has excluded from the pampa all other top predators of larger size, and now is colonizing as we speak, under my foot South Europe, becoming the largest, most numerous species (1/4 of all the flesh living in this planet is ant, another ¼ humans, the 2 social species).

And on the other hand the concept of chaos and entropy has prevented to understand the topological plan of evolution, controlled by the fact that we are made only of space and time, and its similar ‘active’ concepts of kinetic energy and information.

So the explanation of why wings are planes of space and eyes spheres of time… and have evolved so fast, is ignored. The reason though is obvious in T.Œ, a system to survive has only 3 paths, maximal Tƒ in its spherical organs of information, maximal Sp, in its planar organs of kinetic motion and maximal reproduction, improving its networks of communication, either individual or social. And so this implies with the limiting existence of only 3 topologies in the Universe, that those 3 natural paths can evolve very fast, as genetics do work also in ternary symmetries that code those forms.

Further on from physics, biologists have acquired the idea that all comes from the bottom up, so they do not understand the duality of hyperbolic information vs. elliptic motion, which makes also the upper wholes program through larger fields of motion and form, entropy and information, space and time, kinetic and potential energy, lineal and angular momentum variations (all concepts self-similar of the fundamental duality of the Universe, which apply to different systems), its smaller parts. The most obvious case is the relationship between glaciation ages of maximal evolution of information (as cold temperatures imply form) and hot periods of maximal reproduction, (radiations of species) and the whole structure of evolution of the Earth in III earths and 3 x 3 + 1 sub-phases.

And so for each species and ‘scale’ studied by a science, we needed to extract mental, topological, causal-logic, and organic-survival properties, which were different linguistic, isomorphic angles on the perception of the being, none of them carrying the whole truth of the being, but as the famous elephant parable, seeing only a part of it.

In the graph, the linguistic isomorphic method considers that all systems of the Universe are made of the same 2 formal motions of’ temporal energy’ – lineal and angular momentum; potential and kinetic energy, particles and fields; heads and limbs, which combined to create the ‘living systems’ of the Universe, that organize into social herds and organisms, new wholes of a larger ‘scale’ of the fifth dimension.

Thus we can extract from those 3 primary elements: lineal energy, cyclical time (and its ‘fixed forms’: space and information) and its social, relative ternary scales, which co-exist together (the ∆-1, quantum/cellular; ∆-thermodynamic/organic; ∆+1 gravitational, social, ecosystem planes), 3 type of laws common to all beings or ‘isomorphisms’; which we further subdivide in 3 sub-sets. It is the isomorphic, linguistic method that extracts topological, mathematical laws derived of the spatial energy of all beings; logic, causal laws derived of its cyclical temporal nature; and organic, social, survival laws derived of its existence across scales of the 5th dimension.

Yet those 3 x 3 isomorphisms require a final element without which systems would not ‘exist’: I think therefore I am. Indeed, all complete ‘worlds’ do have a 0-point or mind, whose spherical topology allows the system to shrink the Universe into a linguistic mapping mirror of reality, or mind, which extracts the information on the outer cycles of reality the system needs to survive. It is the point of view of the system, its c.p.u., quark, black hole, brain, eye, which apperceives reality and performs the necessary actions for the system to survive, by extracting energy and information from the Universe.  Thus we shall consider 3 x 3 +0 isomorphisms to describes all the systems of Nature, and the forms created by man, with its internal mental languages (art forms) and external atoms (mechanisms).

Scientists of each science that studies a different scale of the fifth dimension cannot apprehend the whole properties of each species, but see on them only the properties their science studied initially – mathematical, lineal time properties in physics, organic properties in life, and so on.

But all the blind people – each disciplinary science –  sticks to the properties their disciplines know more.

Only Leibniz seemed to have ‘seen all the sides of the elephant’  and that was 300 years ago when he told ‘physicists’ like Mr. Newton, who would not receive him – so proud he was of his silly-nilly formula – that duration, t, was the sum of infinite time cycles with finite length. And as those time cycles broke space into inner and outer regions, space was also fractal, the pegging together of infinite time-space cycles. He called this relational space-time, the forebear of 5d fractal space-time cycles.

Einstein said Leibniz was right but to fully understand him, we had to start western science from scratch. Which is what i did and this blog will show. A theory of unification (T.œ) of all the space-time species of all sciences under the old-new concept of a time cycle.

This ‘synthesis’ however was eliminated from science when lineal time simplified the concept of time cycles, and made the knowledge of the rhythms and forms, the information of those space-time motions and its cyclical patterns of evolution, irrelevant to ‘physics’ , simplifying enormously the nature of time and the beings that flow with

But with the arrival of physical time, science lost the concept of ∞ Time cycles, which tic at different speeds. And  create different world cycles, of life and death, different motions, different forms. The measure of this loss was evident when Einstein regained the concept of multiple time clocks in Relativity and when he tried to explain it, he said astonished, ‘i seem to be the only physicist who thinks there are infinite clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’. Nobody understood what he meant. Not even himself.

It is thus clear that the methodology of T.Πis to study all systems of the universe, with all its elements.

So back work with the organic paradigm? The problem are the partial views and the jargons. Nobody takes seriously the little prince who sees the whole elephant behind the line. But we shall try.

We then start with the Ä-point and define it as an organic species with 3 parts, who perceives information with a given language, written in a ternary grammar.

So we can resume both the system and its languages with a fractal generator equation with 3 space symmetries 3 time ages and 3 scales of the 5th dimension with a ⊗-point that cements it all, that is 3 + 3 + 3 +1 = 1o parameters and study them one by one.

Any œ point of view will absorb energy and convert it into information in its mind, adapting that evidence to its subjective, selfish point of view. This is natural to the equation of any mind and so a scientist is by no means immune to that bias. It is precisely the awareness that always we tend to bias information what guard us against all kind of ‘theories’ of reality, based in scanty data, or the use of a single language of truth (mathematics included) to evaluate that data. So truth is higher when more languages are used to evaluate truth, when more logic reason is included.

The organic paradigm stresses the multiplicity of Linguistic, Logic points of view – at least the 3 x 3 + 0 ≈ 10 dimensional perspectives of the 3 scales and 3 space-time elements and the ⊗-point that puts them all together.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.07.08

TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental fractal scales of space, and time cycles that ‘generate’ all the elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

We resume the postulates of the scientific method in a simple formula:

Œ=Sc3: Objectivity, Linguistic, Isomorphic Perspectives, Experimental evidence = Simple, Minimalist, truths – Ockham’s razor, Correspondence Principle, Cyclical repetition – Predictability and Complexity born of the ternary, fractal constant subdivision of reality into parts).

Now of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘Linguistic Isomorphisms’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of Œ (-:

That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).

All those point of views harmonize each other and reinforce the existence of a being. And they are the origin of the 5+5 qualitative and quantitative isomorphisms we use to describe all systems of reality). So we shall apply that methodology as we have done with other systems to astrophysics to describe the Universe and prove that is all what we need to describe reality.

So we have to adapt present theories of the Universe to the 5Dimensional, fractal, cyclical nature of space-time.

How the present Cosmic theory of reality, the big-bang Paradigm fits within that scheme?

Surprisingly enough it rather fits easily, but at present, it shows also some contradictions and limits which might be considered faults of ‘Objectivity’ mainly due to the anthropomorphic desire to explain it all from the human limited perspective.

So while we will introduce the translation of the Big-bang to 5D astrophysics, which would be a bone to get 5D accepted by mainstream science, we will be ‘objective’ to the extreme and conclude that while the big bang is a possible theory of the Universe, in the cyclical, commonly accepted version (with inflation and a final big crunch end, so it becomes a constant cyclical Universe) there is a more objective vision of the Universe, ‘absolutely relative’, and enlarged with infinite scales of space-time, in which the big-bang or an alternative cosmic Universe of trillions of galaxies, in which the cosmic explosion should be just a local phenomena of a local Universe, represent merely another scale of physical systems, as those of quantum particles, molecular atoms, states of matter and cosmic bodies.

Again, this concept is also handled profusely by astrophysicists, albeit by the obvious problem of lack of evidence, at the theoretical level, with the concept of a lower scale – the Planck scale of strings belong the particle scale of the 5th dimension and a larger scale above the galactic scale – of cosmological strings, in correspondence with the world of micro-strings.

We won’t analyze that level beyond considering some necessary corrections in a Universe of ‘background independent space-times’, as it is purely theoretical, and so this post will be dedicated to the analysis of the big-bang from the cyclical, fractal nature of space-time and the highlighting of its ‘scientific problems’, from the perspective of philosophy of science and the rules of epistemological truth we have summarized in the 6 rules of the mnemonic formula, Œ=mc2 (objectivity, Evidence, etc.)

Along the way of course we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.

Now, the fundamental conclusion of the scientific method regarding to astrophysics is obvious but only Einstein pound on it – as he was the only physicist we save as philosophers of science, for respecting the scientific method of true evidence, and simplicity:

‘Physicists should not be occupied with the study of events or species of which there is NOT experimental evidence. Since it is not science’.

And ‘I know when mathematics are truth but NOT when they are real’.

In brief, a physicist must use only the available particles and entities to construct the universe, not those that its mathematical, inflationary distorted linguistic mind view wants to crate for the pleasure of it. Information, minds are inflationary. They are a dime a dozen billion, to put it mildly but worlds of linguistic nature are not reality.

So we will build in Tœ, the Universe perfectly logically explaining al phenomena only with the available particles and forms, and the ternary symmetries of the 5th dimension, fractal space and cyclical time. 


3rd age: Space-time membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.




In the graph, ∆-motions tend to be scalar equations in log(10) or ln (e) terms.

The 3 operandi of arithmetics are superpositions of space-space, time-time (±), reproductions of Space x Time and polynomial and logarithmic equations, which represent processes involving ∆-scales. So we can consider a natural graduation, between operations on the TT, ss FIELDS; MORE complex operation of the ST, product type and complex polynomials able to express all combined ∆ST processes. Let us consider then a very few elements of classic arithmetics/equations translated into Æ.

Equations of polynomials.

Polynomials seem fairly straight, but as soon as we consider its solutions and varieties, things become more fascinating.

First we have 2 mysteries of 2300 years, one which people hardly wonder – why there are 2 solutions to all polynomials, and the other which all mathematicians do but have never been explained – why one of the solutions is often an imposible, imaginary i-solution? What is the meaning of imaginary numbers?

Why polynomials ‘∆-scales’ have 2 solutions?

The answer should be immediate for anyone who has understood anything about GST (hopefully more than those who understood Einstein – I just recall his conferences at Solvay, when he quipped to the same question, ‘maybe the priest’ -Lemaitre):

As all points in motion have 2 directions, upwards and downwards in the ∆-dimension, left-right in lineal geometry, more space or more time in existential topology, youth or old age (rebirth-reproduction or informative evolution).

Thus there are 2 solutions, since the equation does not include a ‘choice’, which will be made a posteriori based in experimental evidence. And so it is evident, as space is larger, and equations quantitative, that in general equations, the positive solution is space-like and the imaginary solution, time-like. And we shall elaborate a lot on that theme along the posts of the 3rd line.

The point to understand the underling structures of the Universe, written in its i-logic mathematical equations, of course is to respond to questions never asked for, as they seem to be the ‘a priori’ human categories of thought (Kant), which Schopenhauer rightly reduced to ‘sufficient reasons’, space, time, causality (mostly caused by ∆ scales in space-time) and the mind that perceives all (languages, ternary grammars).

The fundamental mathematical solution is the polynomial double root solution, where the polynomial is a function of present and the 2 solutions a ± split fields.

Presents thus split in two dual solutions a ± dual field which is essential to understand all time of equations, from the equation of death where the complementary body-head, field-particle system splits, to the inverse equations of social symbiosis in systems that plug-both past and future systems into a present vital form of which the most important happens in social sciences:  

 Animetal Consumer: Humans (O or | function) x Machine



Regarding human ANIMETAl and LIFE minds there is an extensive literature on the themes, which will time permitted considered in the future, once we bring to a minimal level of quality all other posts – the Universe is to extense for a single mind Tº ∆º so much in so little time of finite life duration (: ):




Refounding the principles of science: the scalar, organic ternary 10D universe.

In the graph the 5 Dimensions of space-time, 3 of them can be considered ‘simultaneous states’ as they can be ordered in spatial organisms, and co-exist in a single present plane of reality –  2 of them belong to the scalar dimensions; as they are pure 4D micro-time cycles and 5D macro-space/mind dimensions as they are disconnected from the present being.

To describe the complex organic analysis of reality, we start considering the first 3 dimensions and its formal motions, and its ternary combinations in any given ‘present system’:

  1. 1D: $t: Lineal spatial forms and temporal motions.
  2.  2D: Ø-ST: Energetic motions, in which lineal and cyclical motions combine. ts combinations with information: ‘motions with form’, ‘form with motions’, momentum, energy, transforming entropy and information into each other ad eternal: $pe x Tiƒ=Constant energy. As this ‘space-time’ energetic combinations of entropy and form is what they Universe conserves and cares for.
  3. 3D: §ð: one side clocks of temporal information, and changes in information, which are more obvious in biological system: Tiƒ.
  4. 4D: ∇, ∆-i; ∫∂: without ‘patterns of form’, disordered motion, which we shall call entropy, using its mathematical symbol S and the term for absolute time T, multiplied by ∑ a quantifier, as the fundamental property of entropy is the multiplication of parts, after the dissolution of the form.
  5. 5D: ∆+i: @: • O; whole system with a singularity and a cyclical ‘membrain’.

But those 3 ‘arrows=motions of time’, per se are not organic in its structure. It is when we observe them in nature, when the organic properties surface, as systems perform those 3 arrows of time in a sequential ‘life-death-like cycle’, since systems move, repeat its motions, with increasing ‘form’, information, and then after a third age of maximal information, explode back into an entropic death that disorders them, but somehow they have left behind a copy of themselves that continue the game, and this happens from the simplest quark and electron and photon particles that constantly ‘iterate’ themselves into identical beings through life into the most dense entities, black holes that constantly reproduce seeding in stars and organise galaxies and in-form them.

So the first quality of organisms, to replicate themselves happen in all scales of nature. And then we find precisely that those scales of nature, of smaller beings, moving in faster cycles, co-existing with larger beings, moving in slower cycle defines a ‘new dimensions of scalar space-time’, we shall call generically the ‘fifth dimension’, which organises systems through networks of smaller, faster points that become wholes, which ’emerge’ as a new scale of reality, of larger, slower wholes.

So you co-exist as a cellular being, an individual and an element of a society, and atoms exist as part of crystals and states of matter, which exist as part of larger gravitational cosmic systems. This again can be mathematised through a metric equation, the equation that defines a dimension, as the product of the speed of time of clocks and its size in space, is co-invariant, meaning that one grows when the other diminishes: if you are small paradoxically you turn in faster time cycles and store more information, so chips are smaller when they run faster information, and galaxies are slower and store less information, because they close its circles of information. So we write:

∆ (the symbol for the scalar dimension): Spe x Tiƒ = Constant.

Those constants that define different scales of the Universe, as co-existing systems of faster smaller beings, are the ‘constants of action’ of each scale of reality; vital constants that make organisms run faster metabolic cycles the smaller they are (so rats beat faster heart clocks), and vice versa, but their product of mass multiplied by heart clocks is constant. This law also applies to the clocks of   machines (chips: Moore’s law) and physical systems (Kepler’s third law: the larger the volume of an orbit, the slower its orbital clocks), and all kind of vortices of time/information: Vo x Ro = K; and for each of the 3 scales of nature, we do have a constant of action: h-planck in the quanta scale, which tells us the product of energy and time-information of the system is constant; k in thermodynamic scales…

So this 2 changes in our ‘paradigm’ about time, now made more real and complex, with its infinite clocks and 3 time arrows, and space now made fractal divided into multiple scales. And their co-invariant connection through an ‘scalar fifth dimension’, give organic properties to the Universe, embedded in the very same nature of its ‘structural parts’: ternary time and organic space. In the next graph we resume the Universe as it becomes more complex with those arrows of time, cycles of life and death, scales of the ‘fifth dimension’, and how the 3 arrows of time as ‘forms’ in space ensemble things, into organic patterns:

In the graphs, we observe reality and its complex organisation. We can divide it into 4 type of elements:

-The 3 topologies of space (3 S), the 3 symmetric arrows of CYCLICAL time (3 ð), the 3 scales of the ∆º being, its ∆-1 cellular/atomic parts, and its larger ∆+1 gravitational words/societies, in which it co-exist, and finally the @ ‘membrain’, the singularity of linguistic still perception, connected to the sensorial membrane that isolates but lets information and energy and entropy come through, and ‘encloses the being’ as a separate whole.

Those are the 10 dimensions which in infinite ‘fractal varieties’ creates a space-time organism, whose common properties are:

∆- organic  co-existence of three scales of parts and whole.

$: spatial, topological  as beings are ensembles of |-limbs fields < ø-body waves > O-particles-heads

ð: temporal, causal, sequential: existence of 3 arrows of time manifest in all the actions of the being in detail and in its zero sum through a whole world cycle of life and death – no longer a physical worldline as more dimensions ad more cyclical form to the life of beings, closed in the zero sum of its entropic death.

@: Sentient, as they are mathematically self-centred into a central point of view, and act as if they could gauge and calculate  Indeed,; this is the most difficult part to accept by anthropomorphic beings, but all particles ‘gauge information’ and act-react to that information as if they had perceive it and move accordingly in herds, networks, etc. 

The perception of time by minds; cause of the stillness of spatial forms.

IN THAT REGARD, PHYSICISTS miss the fundamental conceptual truth behind Galilean relativity: the Galilean paradox and its cause – the fact that minds map reality with languages, that are smallish, fixed forms and so when we perceive we reduce the 3+3 dimensions of space and time to 3 dimensions of space, to have a still image, as your eyes give it to you – with hardly any motion, to fit it all in the brain.

Thus because that description is the simplified reduced subjective vision of the human mind, which ‘stops motion’ to fit reality in its smallish brain we must conclude that the ‘real objective Universe’ is made NOT of spatial forms (a mind mirage) but of motions, not of a single continuum but many scales and clocks of time that enclose and break space into internal regions and outer worlds. So reality is about:

-Dimensional ðime Motions not distances; Scalar Spaces, broken and discontinuous (ab.§) not single §pace continuum; and cyclical in form ‘ðime§paces’, not lineal (as we have proved previously).

Let us then consider the second great truth about the structure of reality, the ‘scales’ of sizes and parts that become wholes, which added to the mental paradox of Galileo and the duality of spatial forms and time arrows, will be the ‘underlying first principles’ needed to refund our philosophy of science, and change the paradigm from mechanism to organicism.

Yet it is absolute impossible to make sense of science without considering how the human mind distorts our view of reality and how singularity membrains in all systems close the system, and perform actions of feeding, information and social evolution as IF they were sentient and PROGRAMMED by an automaton series of actions that ensure their survival – feeding the body with energy, moving the system with entropy, gauging information, reproducing in clone forms and evolving socially under an organizative force (gravitation, magnetism in physical systems, love in organisms etc.).

These elements of distortions are sublet but real. For example, the mind sees flat surfaces when it sees large elements but  a larger view of a flat surface becomes curved, as your vision of the flat Earth becomes smaller and a ‘curved’ geodesic of the round EARTH appears. This was used by Lobachevski earlier on to define hyperbolic and elliptic geometries according to the mind’s rod of measure of information and space. As humans use h-planck to measure information and c-speed rods to measure space and h/c is very small we see a very flat Universe.

Distortions in scientific truths: quantum and anti quantum paradox.

So also in physics, we must interpret properly its constants in relationship to the human electronic mind. In that sense physics is perhaps the science we perceive more distorted along social sciences, due to anthropomorphic hang-ups that make quantum physics and astronomy uncertain by lack of perception of smallish and big things and large ones (quantum paradox, dark matter) and social sciences subjective and deformed in its models, by the inverse ‘anti-quantum paradox’ (the scientist is inside the organism of history and must cater to survive to the neuronal people-caste in power, hence adapts it models to please the informative caste).

HENCE biology and its complete description of life beings should be the ORGANIC model for all other entities, whose properties we reduce or distort due to those anti/quantum paradoxes of perception and subjective bias.

Fact is all beings are made of ∆@st, dust of space-time, if we adopt the lowest perception of its organisation in dissolved, entropic herds, or 10D superorganisms of space-time if we study them in all its inner complexity and interrelationships.

Numerology. Numbers that matter: 5 dimensions of space and 5 of time.

So how we shall number those dimensions? We prefer to call them by names that make sense of their topology, scale, function and motion in time, but to do some numerology, we try to respect the principle of correspondence, so we call 1,2,3 the space dimensions; we call 4 as Einstein did, the present dimensions of simultaneous derivative measures of space-time (v=∂s/∂t and similar Einstein’s expression, ∂S²= ∂(x,y,z)² – (ct)²). So we preserve a simple analysis of 3 arrows of space and a PRESENT time arrow, to measure space-motions, which is what physicists do.

Then we can name the 5th and 6th dimensions the other time motions, the simple entropic fields/limbs and informative heads/particles. As we ARE NOT that interested in numerology, you can keep putting numbers.

However when we move into formal mathematics, it will be obvious that the inverse properties of information and entropy, of form and motion, will be matched mathematically by different ‘signs’: spatial dimensions thus will be positive and temporal dimensions negative, and this will also apply to fully grasp for the first time the meaning of negative imaginary numbers, perfectly suited to measure dimensions of time.

So a more telling way to number them is as ±5   Space = – Time dimensions,     S± T = 0 SUM, to make sense of many equations of physics.

And then we talk of 3 dimensions of space equivalent to  (-)3 dimensions of time, in the perpendicular axis, either in a cartesian graph, or a complex graph of ‘bidimensional space and time’ states.

This is needed form formal purposes mostly in physics. So the way to explain numbers for the dimensions is simplified:

3 dimensions of  space, and 3 dimensions of time, merged in 3 ‘dimensions of space-time’ .

And then observing that the scalar dimensions are also INVERSE, as moving into larger slower wholes and moving into faster smaller systems is completely different, we can talk of the fourth dimensions of space and time, as a fast motion down the scales of the fifth dimension, when you dissolve your parts into lower elements in the moment of death.

So death (time, dynamic functional view), in a dissolving big-bang (spatial formal view) are the fourth dimensions of space and time (7th, 8th, if you keep counting them in pairs), and the inverse function of social organisation of parts into wholes, the dimension of eusocial evolution, of love, of organisation, will be the fifth dimensions of space and time, the 9th and 10th dimension, of life and creation of super organisms, the pegging dimension of the mind having the number 10, whole of wholes, in the numerology, which we shall avoid.

It is only worth to remember then, some numbers: 3 dimensions of space, 3 of time, of which if you count them both, separately, the 4th is Einstein’s time dimension in its formalism of measuring simultaneous present.

Entropic death is a fast, dual << descend into entropic death, the 4 dimensions of space-time, the 7th if you count them both.

The fifth dimensions being those of social evolution the arrow upwards of the scalar Universe, which is all together also referred as the scalar fifth dimension; of which if we count all numbers the 10th dimension will be that of the mind that encloses and embodies the perception of the whole.

ðime§pace is everything.
Now we shall tell a simple statement, which encodes all the meanings of the Universe. All what exist are moving time cycles. Indeed, what we call lineal time is just the sum of a series of smaller, ‘faster’ time cycles, pegged one after another.

Lines are therefore built by putting together smallish time cycles, as in membranes made of cyclical cells. Or even more ‘weird’, as XIX century mathematicians proved with non-E geometry, in an inverse view, when you are very small, you perceive a ‘geodesic’ (curved line part of a time cycle), as a straight line, the way you perceive from your ‘microbial point of view’ the large curves of the spherical earth as a flat earth! So lines and flat forms are just geometric distortions of cycles. This Kepler, already said it. Galileo though went the wrong way around, conveying as lines, sections of a curve. 

The Universe is built from those smaller time cycles, which ‘move faster’ and pegged one after another give us the illusion of a larger, slower time-cycle.

What we call in/form/ation, ‘dimensional form’ is then stored in the form and frequency of a time cycle (so we measure in computers its capacity to process information with hertzs, the frequency of its clocks/time cycles).

Information seems to us a solid form, because we don’t perceive it in detail, as those wheels of a bike that seem solid when moving fast.

We have looked at masses and particles and they are vortices similar to time cycles, always moving. So there is not absolute stillness, a ‘maya of the senses/minds that perceive’ time cycles, and will allow us to define soon the equation of the mind.

The law of conservation of entropy, energy and information.

As motion cycles constantly reproduce their form, by the mere fact of moving and repeating/closing its paths – which is the fundamental law of science, the law of conservation of closed energy paths/cycles, explained now in terms of information:

“Spatial motion=entropy never dies, it trans-forms into different forms of in-form-ation ad eternal, giving birth to the infinite, fractal super organisms and its energetic worldcycles of existence: Se<≈>Ti’

This rewriting, with added ‘existential concepts’ of the classic law of conservation of energy thus resumes the change of paradigm we are going to achieve and its formalism, s=t, the generator equation of the fractal universe, in its simplest possible format.

Time masters. Correspondence principle.

Hem, i know, this seems too simple for the pedantic scholar. Don’t worry things soon will become so complex that you will have to upgrade your brain, to the ternary existential logic of that generator, to understand, but alas! if you do, the whole will fill your infinitesimal ‘humind membrain’ in communion with every other part, made to the image and likeness of that whole.

But behind my irreverent style there is a serious respect for time masters, which preceded this work. So we shall very briefly narrate what they found on the different modes of time in the modern age.

In the old age Aristotle defined time as change or motion.

WE agree: time has a simple meaning: motion and change in the present state of seemingly not changing realities. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective and objective and multiple, but quite easy to reduce to external timer-change or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal time-change or change in information.

As the mind is subjective, mind-time perception must then be related to information and indeed, the mind’s speed of processing information defines its time-change perception and ‘beat’=bit of times. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps. It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (ant-queens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.

So with this, we resume the theme of psychological time and we can focus on the evolution of objective external time, either by physicists of motion or biologists of information which 5D unifies.

Yet a full theory of time=change would account for the 4 main forms of time-change, translation in space, change of time information, the mental perception of it, and the different time clocks and scales of size of the Universe.

In that regard, the Universe is a fractal of space-time beings that reproduces information and measures it with different ‘still languages’ of the mind, and so to account for reality we need to account for 4 elements, which were the focus of the work of the four colossus of modern time theory:

  • @: The minds that perceive information and its ‘still languages’ that stop and reduce the dimensions of reality to ‘fit it’ within one’s mind language. This was the work in which the first master of modern time theory and father of the scientific method and analytic geometry, Mr. Descartes excelled, with his theory of many worlds, today forgotten and reduced to a single language, maths and a single timespace, the human measure of it. In mathematics he thus discovered the ‘proper’ tools to study those infinite frames of reference, the cartesian graph.
  • ∆: The scales of reality broken into infinite time clocks that run faster the smaller the scale we observe, which was the focus of the work of Leibniz. Which in the language of mathematics discovered the science of Analysis to study how ‘infinitesimals’ became integrated into wholes.
  • ð: The worldcycles of time, that define the existence of beings, as they go on reproducing its information and evolving into ‘tighter’ denser forms, through the evolution of parts into larger multicellular wholes (evolution theory, genetics, eusocial super organisms). The evolution of temporal information was the focus of the work of Darwin, the third colossus which study in depth the third element of reality, informative time.
  • $: The exhaustion of our knowledge of space, and our still simultaneous perception of it, which Galileo started with his study of the lineal motion of cannoballs, and Einstein took to its absolute limits, completing ALL what physicists will ever tell about the foundational principles of reality, as the science of motion that reduces all time=changes to the lineal analysis of distances and speeds, from t=s/v (Galileo), to S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-c²t² (Einstein’s relative equation of space-time, which is a more detailed variation of the same theme).

Then we find 4 great time masters, only 4 great steps forwards in the modern age, one for each century, contradicted by entropic, lineal physicists (in red), which kept creeping into philosophy of science, fogging our understanding of time-space, with their 3 constant errors – the mathematical religion; the lineal simplification of timespace into entropy, and its measure only with machines.

YET ONCE those errors of lineal time are unveiled, it is relatively easy to put together the 4 elements into a ‘whole’ theory of ∆•st, which is the component of all of us, dust of space-time. And so that is what we shall do in this book.

The generator equation. 

SO THE WHOLE is a super organism, we shall call T.Œ made of ∞ smaller T.œs, super organisms made to its image and likeness.

And we can study the whole in a general manner, extracting its properties and symmetries and this is the Theory of Everything organic or we can in detail study any of  its parts and analyse with different detail its fundamental formal symmetry:

@ = S=T=∆.

Indeed, there is the obvious symmetry between space topologies and time motions, well explained.

But those dimensions of space and time are also symmetric to the 3 scales, of smaller parts and larger wholes; as the entropic parts of the field from where the system absorbs entropy (or its victims in a predatory biological system, or its molecular ATP energy, etc.) will be ∆-1, smaller elements.

And on the other extreme the whole mind ∆+1 will be connected to the outer world.

And in the middle the 3 topological ensembles, s<st>t, will be in the ∆o organic scale.

Finally the mind @, and its singularity •, will see all in a formal language that resumes its ternary structure, so we write a ‘generator equation’ in any language of perception of systems, that embodies all those symmetries and will be equivalent to the physicists’ ‘group pest’ (Weyl), a similar formal instrument to embody all the motions, forms and scalar symmetries of physical nature. 

Unlike the group theory though this is a ‘better focused mirror’ to study nature’s symmetries between scale, time and space and the languages that mirror those elements as it is DIRECTLY connected with reality with no abstract mathematical distortion (easily connected to those more distorted matrix and group theories to classify all those symmetries). So we write:

Γ@ (generator, mind-mirror) = ∆-1 $pe (limb/potential field/Gaia’s territory) ≤≥ ∆0 øst: body-wave-re=productive class ≤≥ ∆+1: O-Tiƒ (particle-head-informative class)

Whereas we resume the 10= 3 x 3 dimensions of all 10D³ space-time organisms with the words we shall use to define its ternary parts in physical, biological and social system (in which those parts are ‘social classes’, ruled by the informative masters in control of legal or financial languages of information).

We contend then that those bits of temporal information and bites of spatial entropy are organic, organise themselves across scales of growing size upwards, and grouping information downward, into timespace organisms.

CONCLUSION. T.Œ: a theory of everything organic = ∑T.œs.

We just have looked at organisms with an anthropomorphic bias, consider them only models for beings that closely resemble us. But in a larger view all systems of nature resemble super organisms made of smaller organisms, enclosed in larger wholes in a chain of beings that organises reality as a complex fractal super organism, NOT as a simplex machine.

Moreover only a theory that encloses concepts such as organisms and time cycles make sense of reality. As a mechanism as Newton realized, require a God to put it in motion. So Kepler said ‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to admire his clock-work.’

God indeed is the seer of time, said Saint Augustine, if you want to use mystical terms, the program that moves time and make things change. But at least as Aristotle noticed we need to consider time flows have several modes of change – change in spatial motion, or entropic change, change in the information of the being, or biological change, and reflection of changes in a mind mapping, a language whose syntax mirrors that of the Universe of space-time or mental change.

All in all the whole reality will then be able to fit in a relatively simple scheme of organisation across all those scales of space-time that co-exist in the being – in a superorganism of 10 dimensions of space and time of entropy and information.

Yet as entropy and information are two sides of the same coin, S=T, we talk in more detail of 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time. The 3 usual dimensions of past, present and future; and 2 more of each to define, the growth and diminution of size, between scales, whose laws organise the organic outlook of reality as smaller parts become attached to larger networks, that mess together into organic system.

Physicists call its theory of everything T.O.E. but the model for everything is not clear, we shall call the ever alternative view of an organism, which is the only scientific view, as only an organism is self-generating and hence it does not need an external deity to cause it but only the laws of science, a T.œ, theory of Eerything Organic; A theory of fractal 10 Dimensional Organisms, with 5 dimensions of time and 5 of space...

But how reality reproduces? Simple because reality is made of motion-time that becomes in-form-ation, memorial space, by merely moving it reproduces the motion of the form. And because time as in all clocks is cyclical, repetitive, it reproduces form as it moves and ‘closes’ a form, cycle.

The concept behind T.œ is thus rather simple. The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space-time, hence made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

To proper describe the complexity of an organism, we just need 10 dimensions: 3 of time, past, present and future, 3 of space, its 3 bidimensional topologies or 3 standard ‘lineal dimensions, 3 of ‘∆±i-planes (with its decametric §cales of growth) as all beings co-exist in a larger world and are made of smaller parts, and finally the ‘membrain’ (monad or mind), which closes the ‘open ball’ of 9 dimensions, with its sensorial enclosure membrain that lets entropy, energy and information sip into the being, and its linguistic zero-sum singularity that maps the whole and commands its behaviour.

As such all super organisms of space-time follow the same laws, as they are made of the same substances.  And so we start by a dimensional, static analysis of the being and its 10 dimensions, provided by a simple ‘generator equation’ of each ‘T.œ”.

T.œ then becomes the briefest way to explain it all, as a Timespace œrganism, and also as the Theory of Everything organic, such as: T.œ= ∑t.œs. This is then the simplest conceptual definition of reality.

In the first line we shall explain the static and dynamic workings of all T.œs, in the second line, we shall refer each of the four main sub-disciplines of human thought, which analyse differently physical, biological social and mental=linguistic systems, as T.œs, and in the third line more complex, we shall study each of the main scalar T.œs of reality, with a detailed analysis of its 4 components: space topologies, time ages, organic scales and the @membrain; subdivided in 4 x 3 sub-elements, to fully describe them. It is the isomorphic method that applies 4 x 3 sub-elements of reality to the analysis in detail of all ‘stiences’, each study a range of T.œ according to scalar size.

And so such orderly methodology will show you the unity of all what exists.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering them, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs… My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence that this incoming Fall of 2017 I believe will reach enough clarity and density of information to fully change the paradigm of ‘science’ into ‘stience’ (the study of relational space-time beings), if the reader ‘trusts’ such ‘huge’ affirmation and ‘reasons’ enough to enjoy the reading

Barcelona, 2017, Luis Sancho, Philosopher of Stience.



A FAST TRACK RESUME of the work of the four+1 seekers of time.

We study in more depth the findings of those 4 great time masters, one for each century, which preceded this work in our post on time-space. So we shall where just summarise them: 

  • In the XVII c. Descartes found the CARTESIAN graph, of space-time and defined it as the ‘world of human minds’, but affirmed there were infinite other minds and possible languages mapping reality. This was not understood by physicists so Galileo ‘reduced’ ALL MINDS AND LANGUAGES to mathematical and cartesian graphs. Yet he did also some important advances in the science of motion (studied of translations, in space, realisation of the relativity of motion, definition of time as a parameter of space- v=s/t, to measure those translation, use of mechanical clocks, etc.).

The paradox of the • mind. Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception.

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’

We shall explain all what exists departing from the ultimate reasons of reality, as defined by the greatest western philosophers of science, Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant and Schopenhauer.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘every infinitesimal singularity ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it perceives as its sensorial membrain, self-centred in its self’.

Only the objective mind of ‘stience’ is able to strain away from the paradox and realise he is in a buddhist sense just a particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole,

Objectivity does only enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings.

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe.

It must be understood that without a mind that observes the Universe reality would not exist and systems would not work efficiently as blind beings. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

So while all its time; as it turns out, space which is the perception of ‘simultaneous time cycles’, by a ‘linguistic mind’ that stops its motion, must be account for. And finally as time cycles are of multiple sizes and scales, we must also consider, ∆, the dimension of scales of reality, which we shall  call by the correspondence principle the fifth dimension, to fully describe reality in certain detail. Those four elements will be all what we will need to describe all what exists, referred either to the mind’s linguistic equation, for which we use in different contexts symbols similar to zero (ø, 0, •,œ) or to the space-time symmetry (still or moving realities for which we use classic symbols for a single space and lineal time, st, or those for the more complex scalar space and cyclical time: §ð) or to the scales of space-time, (∆§).

Hence our affirmation that all is ‘∆•st’: dust of space-time, which we can either see as a zero-singularity (∆•st) from an outer point of view, or if we adopt the inner point of view of the mind, self-centred of a world that departures the whole Universe, we can consider each of us an island-Universe: ∆ûst.

Of course, if you prefer a shallow reality which does not explain much beyond the external description of what we ‘see in still space’, there is a third view called ‘naive realism’, akin to logical positivism, which merely stops the inquire in ‘physical descriptions of it all’. This is the ‘practical’ view of science today imposed by physicists, the ‘science of motion’, which is fine as long as it does NOT pretend to usurp the position of philosophers of science, which try to go further in the inquire, as this blog on ‘philosophy of science’, specifically on ‘general systems sciences’ the alternative, perennial philosophy of science that considers the Universe an organic whole, do. In that sense Naive realism is called in philosophy of science, ‘reductionism’. And we deal extensively with its limited truths on the posts on GST and epistemology.

We are all beings made of a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cyclical time… with a central singularity or frame of reference that orders it all…

  • In the XVIII C. Leibniz (philosophy of relational space-time as a the ultimate substance of a reality made of vital spaces which last a finite time quantity, first hint at the fifth dimension of scales with different time clocks, and development of the mathematical tools to study those scales of smaller faster parts that become wholes – analysis).

Leibniz realized what physicists called absolute time and space was just a mathematical artifice but in the real world all what we saw was vital spaces pegged together and lasting a finite time cycle. So we were not in an abstract background graph of timespace, but we WERE made of time duration and vital space with motion and form (Galileo’s paradox). Further on he foresaw the existence of a scale 5th dimension as ‘each point is a world in itself’, so he founded Analysis, the science to study those scales of infinitesimal parts and wholes.

In the graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time.

There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence.

TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

The errors of Galileo and Newton. Lineal single time. Mathematical religion invents a background space-time.

Physicists belief in a mathematical religion that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts thinking maths NOT space and time create reality is THUS at the bottom of the biggest blunder of science regarding the nature of time and space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’.

So they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

Fact is those multiple time clocks in the Universe, define a fractal reality as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size.

And those closed time cycles carry information in their frequency and form, from mass vortices to charge vortices to cyclical waves that repeat their information.

So lineal, expansive, disordered time motions –  ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, ARE THE LESS important ‘form of change=time’ in the Universe.

And its shrining as the only arrow of time by the error of lineal physics, a blunder that hides the cyclical repetitive patterns and informative, accelerated vortex of time – THE MOST important arrows of time change in the Universe.

So we talk of three timespace changes, three arrows of time, and a scalar ‘fifth dimension’ of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller:

In the graph we can see a first view of the 3 arrows/forms/function/dimensions of space-time, entropic, expansive space, iterative wave-like space-time and informative, cyclical vortices of time, the biggest of which is the slow vortex of the galaxy, the fastest of which are the H-clocks of quantum atoms. THEY CARRY the information of our electronic world.

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

In the next graphs we show two classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.

What is the ultimate cause of this law?

As almost all the laws and symmetries of the Universe, it is caused by the Galilean paradox that makes a ‘dimension of form=space’, equivalent to a dimension of motion=time, when we see ‘the static earth moving’. i.e. the three dimensional volume/mass static in space is equivalent to a bidimensional time-cycle in motion, whereas the dimension of time motion IS equivalent to the dimension of volume space.

And we can further prove this fact observing how ‘physical systems’ evolve in ‘time’ increasing its time dimension, by flattening its volume – which is a key consequence of the Galilean paradox to understand all kind of physical entities and phenomena, notably, ‘accelerated bidimensional vortices of time, masses and charges, which store the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles’:

In the graph, creation and destruction of symmetric dimensions of time (distance, motion, acceleration) back and forth into dimensions of space (length, width, height). The symmetries between the 3 dimensions of space and time, either in ‘lineal fashion (just explained) or in bidimensional topological form/function: (entropic, disordered expansion of flat space or past, informative cyclical implosion or future and reproductive hyperbolic body-waves) IS the essence of all space-time phenomena when observed objectively externally, defining the 3+3 dimensions of a single plane of the scalar Universe.

What physicists have done is to reduce the 3 dimensions of time to a single PRESENT time quanta, ∂t=∂s/∂v, to measure ONLY the instant, present steps of a lineal motion, completely reducing our understanding of time=change to the bare minimum.

And then imposing this entropic, derivative, minimalist view of time, with the power of its worldly religion – making entropic weapons and bullying philosophers of science, biologists, and society as the high popes of knowledge, cause they have machines to ‘measure better’, never mind the peanut logic of its timespace membrains.

That’s how it is. We have been bombed not only with bombs courtesy of its worldly religions for a century of massacres, but with the mantra that time is the 4th dimension of space, and Einstein the biggest genius of mankind since… Newton told us the cartesian graph was the reality of space-time. And we all believe it, since a people who can obliterate the planet with a-bombs… how can they be wrong? Irony is really needed, in all things human.

Now if you want to be more complex than that, ad 3 + 3 = 6.

Then when we ad the 3 scalar dimensions of any form which is made of parts and belongs to a larger world, and the mind dimension we obtain…

The 10 DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE OF fractal superorganisms.

So we have the elements that create all realities as fractal self-similar super organisms, co-existing in 3 scales of size, with 3 topologies of space, 3 time functions/ages, all wrapped up by a membrain – an external enclosure focused and controlled by an internal still linguistic singularity that controls it all and will ‘act’ to ensure the system receives enough entropic motions, information for its particle-head and mix both to  reproduce clonic beings – THE PROGRAM OF THE 10 DIMENSIONAL SUPERORGANISM OR fundamental species of the Universe.

We shall call the sum of its 3 ‘scales’ of different size and different time speed, the ‘fifth dimension’ in a general way, to ‘respect’ the present simpler analysis of 3 space dimensions and one time dimension, in Einstein’s work. But as we advance more in the details of the model of relational space-time, developed in this blog, we shall realise the best way to explain reality is accounting for its 10 dimensions/parameters of reality:

  • 3 dimensions of topological space: lineal expansive space; hyperbolic, iterative wave-like forms and implosive, cyclical, informative forms, symmetric to the 3 arrows/functions of time:
  • 3 dimensions of time: entropic, past, disordering timespace; reproductive, repetitive=present timespace; and future, in-form-ative, cyclical timespace; which ARE LOCAL arrows for each being that ‘increases its information through most of his life time’ in 3 ages, and dies in an entropic explosion in a single quanta of time – reason why we give the name of ‘local past’ to an entropic, fast process, and local future to the much longer process of warping of entropy into information through the life-existence of any physical or biological system.
  • 3 scales of size and relative time clocks, which give organic properties to reality. As all systems are made of smaller parts, and are themselves part of larger world, and so, we need to fully describe the being, to account from its 3 dimensions of space, of time and of scale, which are warped together into a whole by
  • The mind, which has a linguistic, still mapping of all those parts, put together and enclosed by a membrane, that breaks the system into an outer world and inner region.

So we talk then of  [ (3 space≈3 time) x 3 scales] +  @-mind = ‘membrain’; as the needed parameters to have a ‘whole description of the being’.

And depending on how much of those elements we describe we can get ‘different number of dimensions’, from the maximal possible number (6 space-time dimensions in each scale, multiplied by 3 scales, which give us 18 dimensions, plus the ‘whole mind-dimension’) to the bare minimum, considering merely the 3 space-time dimensions of a system seen in a single plane.

All those descriptions have happened in science in different times and terms, as it happens today in the mathematical description of closed time strings and open spatial strings, which go from 3 to 26; but most are 10 dimensional strings (described with 10 parameters).

We shall in that sense adopt also two basic analysis: the synoptic •5D³ analysis, from the perspective of scales, packed in the fifth dimension, and its ‘metric equation’, (max. space size = min. speed of time clocks) that harmonises all those scales, as smaller systems run faster cycles and can code with information larger wholes, and wholes have more energy-motion and can feed and control smaller parts with it (so your cells code your information and you move them as a whole in synchronicity) allowing the symbiosis of the organic Universe.

We write it though with the addenda of •, the symbol for the mind-singularity (or @, which is the symbol for the membrain, the mind and the external sensorial skin, which if you realise IS WHAT YOU ARE: A STILL MIND-MAPPING OF LANGUAGES OF THOUGHT, which extract information through your sensorial skin), and explains Galileo’s paradox: you ‘perceive information in stillness.

Those are fundamental logic concepts of the structure of reality, which will explain many pending questions of all sciences, showing the extraordinary power to explain the reality of cyclical time and fractal space.

For example, in physics there are two fundamental ‘weird’ paradoxes nobody has explained rationally whose solution is immediate through the Galilean ‘membrain’ paradox:

The quantum paradoxes of the wave=lineal motion/cyclical particle=informative state duality. I.E. Why we see either waves moving or particles colliding. Obviously because we only perceive  information in stillness. So when we perceive the dual quantum system, we perceive still particles as we stop them.

While in relativity there is the paradox of light which is constant in speed, even if the system that emits light seems to be moving in our macroscopic scale. YET because PHOTONS are particles, electrons and atoms only emit them in the quantum scale in relative entangled stillness with the other particle that perceives it. So  in the quantum scale both are still and there is no motion to ad. What relativity does is to ‘correct’ for our macroscopic scale where we do see motion, to adapt reality to the mind of our scale of measure.

The physicist’s view: 4D time, a single ‘moment’ to measure motion in space.

Yet all this and many solutions in all sciences are forbidden and ignored because we have been…

Dragging those aforementioned errors of lineal time and a single clock for centuries, and they have halted human understanding of the essential principles of Nature – cyclical time and fractal space.

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonised lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion.

This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which was defined in the XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

Further on, physicists to measure motion, not only ‘reduced time≈change’ to a parameter of space (the so called 4 dimension of space which is NOT) giving birth to what we, philosophers of science, call ‘reductionism’ – his theory of reality; but they deformed 2 of the most obvious quality of the infinite ‘time clocks’ of the Universe:

-To be multiple, as there is one clock of time for each process of cyclical, repetitive change that happens in nature – circadian clocks in life, genetic clocks in cells, orbital clocks in planets, rotary clocks in electrons, etc. – to process and store the in-form-ation, in the dimensional form and cyclical frequency of its clocks. So for example, you measure the informative capacity of your computer in ‘gigahertzs where hertzs measure the frequency of its clocks. 

-To be cyclical, as all clocks are like those in your wall: repetitive cycles or events, origin of the ‘causal laws’ of science. Since a scientific law exists when we know a pattern or action will happen again, if its causes are repeated.

How they did it? Simple. Because physicists have another huge ‘conceptual error’ in their analysis of reality. They do NOT think that reality is made of ‘its primary substances’, vital space with motion, which last a finite duration of cyclical time, whose geometric and logic properties, all entities of nature perceive with different languages of space-time measure – so for example humans measure space with eyes and perceive time with words  and its 3 ‘tenses’ of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time.

For physicists since the wrong interpretation of quantum physics became dogma, the language of mathematics creates reality, in a similar fashion to the theory of reality of abrahamic religions, in which ‘the word’ (arab in islam) creates reality. So god spoke arab and ‘created things naming them in arab’. For physicists god creates things uttering equations. And so Newton affirmed that a mathematical tool, the cartesian graph, in which the cycles of time had been uncoiled and fusion into a long line in the paper-axis, to measure better lineal motions (v=s/t) WAS THE ONLY CLOCK of time of the Universe, which became then ‘lineal, infinite and with the single beat of the mechanical clock’.

This astounding deformation of THE DEEP meanings of time, became a dogma, which facilitated measures of ‘motions in space’, to the extreme detail achieved by physicists and heralded as absolute genius – so when Einstein refined further this limited formula of time, to achieve even more exact measure of motions, he was considered the most intelligent man on earth.

FACT THOUGH is that measuring spatial distances and speeds IS not all what matters to reality; and ‘reductionism’ of time to space measuring negating all other ‘forms of change’, notably change in the in/form/ation of beings, studied by biology and evolution is a blunt error that has endured for centuries halting the understanding by mankind of those fundamental principles.

It ended up also creating an absurd theory of reality and the meaning of it all, called ‘entropy’ according to which since all changes in nature have been reduced to change in motion, all what exists is a constant growth of motion, and disorder; and the origin of it all is a big-bang of motion.

Never mind Darwin found that the true important form of change in nature is the opposite evolution of ‘form’ of in-form-ation. Physicists shunned off this other form of change=time and call it negantropy, the negation of entropy. Never mind Einstein, showed that ‘time curves space into masses’, the cyclical eddies of space that convert lineal space into cyclical accelerated time clocks, which create the physical information of nature, in vortices of time called galaxies, in which we live – reason why we are also ruled NOT by motions in space but by biological processes of growth and evolution of information.

They denied the other physical arrow of time, informative masses, and came up with an absurd theory, according to which Einstein was wrong and masses are NOT accelerated vortices of time (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) but ‘again’ a collision between ‘something’ and a particle called the Higgs gave mass to the particle – no longer an intrinsic property of an eddie of time, which attracts as any eddie the faster it turns around in its cyclical clocks, but ‘something’ obtained by collisions.

And finally they denied the most attractive, faster turning eddie of time, the black hole, and Hawking affirmed black holes are NOT vortices of time, because they ‘travel to the past’, and instead of attracting and dragging all what surrounds them to the vortex, as they move to the past, do exactly the inverse of what we see them doing – they evaporate and explode ‘again’ into a burst of entropy.

This is the essence of the relational space-time model  first advanced by Leibniz in its contradiction of Newton’s absolute space-time, then corroborated by Einstein, which was left alone by the community of quantum physicists, and I have developed for decades and will pour in this blog, since it is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion.

  • In the XIX century Darwin gave back to biological, informative time the primacy it deserves but had lost since the Greeks, due to the anthropomorphic biblical egocentered view of man as unchangable (theory of change in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings), latter applied to all fields.

So how can we complete the work of Darwin with the 3 arrows of time-space, entropy, energy and information? It will require for you to understand and solve once and for all the discussion between ‘creationists and darwinians’, punctuated evolution (right as time accelerates information so there are explosions of creativity) vs. constant evolution, and explain why ultimately all is about genetics. So allow me to tell uyou what are the 3 ‘topological forms of evolution’.

Topological evolution and scalar genetics, completing the work of Darwin and Mendel with 5D³ Genetics.

What about genetics? Here 5D complete the reasons why we are ruled by ternary genes, which code the ternary arrows of biological systems.

But genes only code individuals NOT societies, which are ruled by memes (hence the falsity of racism). Why? Because as we aw in the graph of 5D scale: a lower scale of faster clocks CODES the next larger organisation of the Universe, where ‘new informative systems’ emerge to code the next scale of the russian doll but each ‘new doll’ is a discontinuum and so the information of the enclosed smaller, denser informative doll cannot cross those barriers and code 2 scales above.. See in the graph where we see the metric of the fifth dimension we can see how this work: smaller beings run faster time clocks and so they can store and process more information. so chips move faster information than machines and rules them.

Genes run faster clocks that store in the form and frequency of its cycles the information of biological beings. Black holes run galaxies and MEMEs (ideas, instruments) run larger social organisms, nations and civilisations.

So THE CO-EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE SCALES OF TIME, which run faster clocks IS the key to understand the co-existence in an organic manner both in physical and biological systems, of multiple scales of time-space: Spe x Ti = k (co-invariance of size and speed of information, which is the metric equation of 5D).

Topological evolution: creationism or darwinism?

The next graphs show the fundamental advance on timespace theory brought about by properly studying the three arrows of time=change of form, of in-form-ation, in the Universe and its topological combinations that create all systems in space, its 3 ages that explain the life-death cycle of all systems. Below the scales of the fifth dimension that define systems as co-existing organisms, joined by the three arrows of time, forming the physiologic networks of all super organisms of the Universe.

Since the line is the fastest distance and so for entropy systems the best form, the hyperbolic body-wave includes all forms and hence it is the best to reproduce a system, and the sphere warps maximal information in minimal space and so it is the form of head-particles, the true meaning of time-space is the fact that all systems are made of forms with a function, which are both still and moving (Gallean relativity) and perform the three actions=arrows of motion, iteration and gauging of information for all beings, defining the Fractal generator equation of space-time beings, the fundamental equation of relational space-time:

Γ. ∆-1; $: (limbs/fields of maximal-moption) < ∆: ITERATIVE, HYPERBOLIC-body-waves>∆+1: Tƒ (informative spherical particle/heads) <<∆-2: death: entropic dissolution of information:

In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:

Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.

Since the line is the shortest distance between two points. So all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.

And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.

Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are. So  all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species:

In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.

  • In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):

General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein.

In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency.

So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.

IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle.

Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:

Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).

Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:

This is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ .

XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5•D³=10D: Absolute relativity.

And so after those 4 colossus walked the path of timespace knowledge, one for a century, in the XXI c. the 5•D³ formalism completes the work of all of them, solving all the pending questions about timespace change, and unifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time; which I also call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings- since now we add relativity of scale to the growing objectivity of science (graph) away from anthropomorphic myths.

Let us then after this brief introduction to the flow of human thought about time, go on with the model of 3 time arrows and ∞ scales of size, which we shall call 5•D³ or ∆ST (∆ ab. 5D dimension of scales) or GST, General Systems theory, the philosophy natural to the co-existence of multiple organic scales of parts and wholes and ternary cycles or ages of life.


How the GST first principles of a world made of relational space-time beings, differs from the modern methods of astrophysics and religion, the rival theories, in the understanding of the origin of the Universe is obvious:

Astrophysics, which strictly followed till the XX c. the scientific method aforementioned, since the wrong quantum interpretation (Copenhagen, as opposed to Einstein->Broglie->Bohm pilot-wave theory, which we deem and shall prove the right interpretation) partially abandoned the experimental, method substituted by a ‘digital, computer method’, based in the belief that the substance of the Universe is NOT time and space but ‘MATHEMATICS’, which merely mimics the arrogant method of religion, which believed that the language of God was ‘words’. So as Mohammed thought that God had created reality by ‘speaking arab’; astonishingly enough since Hilbert affirmed that ‘he imagined points, lines and numbers’, creating maths, humans and God spoke maths and created reality by ‘writing equations’.

Few people realise of that ascientific outlook of modern astrophysics, consisting in expressing a model in mathematics, as if the digital language was a magic underlying reality which sufficed in itself, then put it into computer models, publish it and claim it the theory must be truth because it is mathematically beautiful even if there is not much proof of it (often in ‘grand metaphysical theories like the big-bang’, clearly falsified as we shall show, bending with ‘human ambition’ and ‘belief’ experimental data to prove the theory). The big-bang then is the necessary religion for physics to claim to know the meaning of it all. And so we shall deal with it first in this introduction.

Religion on the other hand, which we shall show has a historic role as the embodiment in the human verbal language of the laws of the scalar social Universe, simply ignores the method, and establishes with repression of truths, fantasies and ‘beliefs’ his thesis about the Universe, which is not its role. And with a similar method to the Copenhagen interpretation. God spoke the language of certain semitic tribe (hebrew or Arab), which are imperative languages, where the verb goes first (as they were hierarchical, dictatorial societies where the king/aristocracy/banker-priests of its societies barked orders). And so as the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’, the priest spoke in imperative and ‘God had spoken and created’ reality.

So we shall show also that while religions do have meaning (all what exists must, remember have a reason, within the organic paradigm), its reach has been overblown; and its method of truth, to believe ‘words are the language of creation’, as in the case of the Copenhagen interpretation, and many modern theories of astrophysics (including string theory and the big-bang) are not truth. We expand in our chapters on epistemology and T.œ that solid analysis of the advantages of a NON-CREATIONIST theory of reality, which unlike the creationist big-bang and Copenhagen interpretation, and creationist religion, departs from a simple concept: an organic, immortal, self-reproductive fractal Universe of information that always existed, always will exist and always will repeat the same entities (including all of us, also immortal in a discontinuous way).

Now it MUST be clear, and we SHALL repeat it ad nauseam, that Humans ARE NOT infinitely stupid, a bad choice of wording by Mr. Einstein, but infinitely arrogant, as they confuse their mind-infinitesimal with the infinite Universe its mirror-monad reflects and this fact IS THE MAIN REASON THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND or will EVER ACCEPT the truths of the organic, fractal Universe that makes them equal in value in the absolutely relative reality to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy. SO reason does not suffice, as the ego subjective paradox is the center of all self-centred systems with a mind singularity. This I know after decades of explaining with reason, the ego-paradox of BOTH, physicists, who will uphold the cosmic big-bang and the absurd idea that the infinite Universe was born of an infinitesimal point, duly smaller than the human mind so the physicist can ‘feel he knows it all about all’, arguably an even more arrogant≈stupid belief that the idea a ‘jewish peasant’ created it all.

The very fact that such ‘stupidity’ is today canonical dogma only proves the truth of the equation of the mind. Point. But we shall for good measure put the objective mirror of the scientific method over it, here in broad strokes, in our article on astronomy on detail, to show that indeed, big-bang theorists have nothing to envy to biblical priests in their twisting of facts to cater to their delirium of greatness. And humans, being all of the same mind species, cheer, 1/2 believing in the infinitesimal Universe, 1/2 in the iron age creator of it all.

RECAP. Absolute relativity: the real logic of the ∞ Universe.
The Universe is ‘absolutely relative’, not only on motion (Einstein’s relativity, without preferred location), form (Darwinian evolution without man as a perfect form) but also in scales, as each ‘entity’ has a limit of its capacity to perceive larger and smaller scales of information, which in the human case extends to the galactic and atomic scale, of similar properties, distorted by the distance to our 5D position in the Universe. And so those limiting physical scales are NOT the origin of the laws of reality but only the limit of human perception of the fractal Universe.

And only a science that studies all the scales together in equal footing, void of power agendas, or historic hang-ups and dogmas, will be able to fully grasp the synthetic laws common to them all. This is the task we shall carry in this blog.



II. ‘T.Œ’:



‘Complexity (General Systems Theory) will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking


Philosophy of STience: The organic Universe.

T.Œ: the isomorphic, homologic method.

Abstract.  If you stomp here by chance please read first the central post.

This is the only formal, logic and mathematical model of relational space-time available to science – a fractal, organic model that defines all what exist as a whole or part of a super organism of cyclical times and fractal space, with an astounding capacity to resolve and explain all sciences, both physical, biological and human.

As such T.œ differs from T.O.E. the much simpler view of the Universe propers of physics, in several empirical facts:

  • That time is cyclical measured by ∞ clocks with different speeds, which follow three topological space-time tendencies: towards entropic expansions of space; its inverse, in-form-ative implosion, and its combined or balanced closed cyclical motions of space-time defined by its repetitive conservation as ‘momenta’ or energy cycles.
  • That space is fractal, co-existing in several scales of size (so for example you do have different circadian clocks, and co-exist  ‘above’ with a larger world, the earth with different rotational and translational clocks, and co-exist ‘below’ your smaller cells, forming together a super-organic whole, (ab.œ).
  • That reality is NOT made or created by languages (either words, as in abrahamic religions or numbers as in platonic, physical philosophies of reality) but of the a priori substances, which exist prior to the languages-mirrors that ‘see them’, space and time. So we are ALL space-time beings.
  • And that the duality of three arrows of time and fractal co-existing scales of space gives ORGANIC properties to the Universe. SO reality is  made of organic space-time beings, ‘space-time organisms’.
  • And as a consequence of this, we can extract a series of isomorphic laws derived of the fractal structure of space across different scales of size, each with different speed in its cycles of time, ordered sequentially in 3 ages/arrows that define the world cycle of beings.

So really reality is simple, but not that ‘simpler’, and isomorphic, homologic, not analogic, meaning all is part of a space-time organisms and all space-time organisms have similar properties regarding its ternary topological nature in space, its 3 ages in sequential time symmetric to those topologies, extending in 3 co-existing scales of smaller atomic/cellular/citizen  units which form larger organisms (matter states, organisms and cultures), themselves part of a larger whole (a gravitational world, ecosystem or humanity at large in time, the ‘super organism of history’).

It is then a wonder that such obvious structure of reality is still ignored and vehemently denied by humans, though we offer ‘objective reason’ to that blindness, namely the ‘ego paradox’ as all systems are self-centred and see a distorted reality where only the ‘being that perceives matters’. So humans have simply denied organic, sentient elements to all realities except those similar to themselves.

Fact is all systems do have ‘temporal, spatial, scalar and mental properties’ as all will show to have also a ‘membrain’, an @ singularity and enclosure, which perceives the whole and acts with survival actions to ‘ensure its existence’.

This final ice in the cake of 10D models of relational space-time, fully understood by the first philosophers of science, Descartes and Leibniz, however was denied in the praxis of technological physics, which reduced all times to the single lineal time of a mechanics clocks, and all minds to the human euclidean light space-time perpendicular mind.

So we do make a lot of insights and paragraphs showing the difference between the praxis of physics and its reductionist, naive realism and the much larger encompassing view of philosophers of science, which have always accepted a pan psychic organic Universe (as a few inclined to philosophical disquisition, physicists, such as Leibniz and Einstein, clear predecessors of this work, also believe).



‘Nihil est sine ratione.’ Leibniz

 The earlier mechanist linear models of space-time of physical sciences failed in its search for the ultimate answers to our existence in the Universe, signified in the commentary of Feynman, happy with a simplex, external description of the Universe, without its whys. Yet not all scientists gave up on their search for the full understanding of those whys – the thoughts of God in the dictum of Einstein- which all scientists agreed should be found in the ultimate ‘causal reasons’ of the universe – the nature of space, time its dimensions and causal processes.

It will then come as a huge surprise to the reader that the finding of those whys to the existence of the Universe is much simpler than anyone might imagine, as it requires only two basic upgrades in our concepts of space and time – foreseen in the earlier work of Aristotle and Plato, in classic philosophy, Taoism and Hinduism in classic religions, in the pioneer work of Leibniz and Descartes, the fathers of modern philosophy of science, and the physical insights of Einstein and Planck in the multiple nature of time clocks and the quantum, broken structure of space.

Those 2 upgrades illustrated in the next graphs are:

  • The understanding of the cyclical, NOT lineal, Nature of time, AS all time clocks are closed cycles that repeat certain actions and events with a given discontinuous frequency, origin of the causality and patterns of science.
  • And the scalar structure of space, which is composed of quantum, smaller parts that ensemble in networks of similar ‘Non-Euclidean points’, which become whole larger structures again ensembled into larger wholes in a game of russian dolls that gives organic, co-existing, fractal properties to space. They will define a ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar space-time and its formal ‘metric equations’, the key to unveil the ‘world cycles’ of life and death of all systems, born in seminal seeds of a lower scale, emerging in a larger world, returning back in death…

This r=evolution of our concepts of space and time, made more complex by adding form to time cycles and scales to space, does follow the basic law of epistemology – the correspondence principle, as it includes the previous paradigm of science, since lineal single time arrows are merely the limit of a ceteris paribus analysis of cyclical time in a single dimension, and 4D space-time, the limit of study of space-time scales in the human light space-time continuum (which the very same Einstein already broke, when adding General relativity and the study of the Non-euclidean scale of gravitation, now fully understood as two different scales of the fifth dimension). So we shall merely upgrade in different posts those previous simplified models of reality to fully grasp the cyclical and scalar nature of space and time.

Which in turn will lead to an upgrading of the Formal ‘Stiences’ of mankind:

  • Spatial mathematics, evolved from ‘Euclidean concepts’ of ‘points with no-breath’, into Non-Euclidean fractal points with an inner volume of information through which ∞ parallels might cross – completing the formal r=evolution started in the XIX c. by lobachevski and Riemann, applied then by Einstein to understand the two scales of space-time perceived by humans (gravitational and light space-time).
  • And the upgrading of Aristotelian logic, based in a single arrow of time, into a ternary, temporal logic, in which the three arrows of time co-exist to create an event, foreseen in the dualist logic of eastern philosophies (taoism, hinduism) and Hegelian Dualism.

Epistemology. How to assess the truth of such big statement.

For what we have said, this blog should ‘potentially’, when properly developed by XXI c. researchers on T.œ encode the biggest r=evolution of human thought since the advances made on space-time theory a century ago (given the ‘ginormous’ scope of the upgrade, we have divided it in two x two lines – the first two, simpler, with the theoretical upgrades in line 1 and its application to most stiences in line 2. The third and fourth line more complex fully changing the model paradigm, and likely not to be completed in my lifetime).

How can we prove it? Obviously, considering how its content fares from the p.o.v. of epistemology, the theory of truth developed by philosophy of science. And compare it with the two fundamental ‘grand theories’ of everything, which we roughly can call ‘astrophysics’ and ‘religion’.

In essence, epistemology tells us that a better theory must obey the principle of correspondence (previous certain theories must be simplified cases of the larger theory), Ockham’s razor (it must be simpler and more economic in its first principles than other theories) and the experimental method (it must have on the positive an enormous number of proofs, and in the negative no case that can show its falsehood). It is NOT part of the epistemological method, the main error of modern science – to believe that because a theory can be written with mathematics is truth per se, as ‘the languages of god (mind of the universe) are ∞’ Upanishads. Though we of course show that mathematics, the main language of space, and logic, the main language of time, are excellent mirrors of the space and time properties of the Universe.

Now, for the three methods of truth:

  • Correspondence:  we shall first show in this introduction how astrophysics and religion can fit within an organic theory of space-time easily while the opposite is not truth (astrophysics cannot explain why ‘religions’ exist and vice versa, and neither can make account of the biological, organic properties of reality).
  • Ockham’s razor: we shall show how the whole model departs from two simple principles. Reality is made of space, which has fractal, scalar, self-repetitive properties and cyclical time, which has two inverse arrows/dimensions of time, entropy and its inverse information, which combine into energetic momentums. So basically all can be deduced of the fractal structure of space and the inverse arrows of entropy-motion and in/form/ation.
  • Experimental method: From those two properties, we shall prove that all events and species of the Universe and its laws can be potentially deduced. As this is an infinite task, I will keep pouring through my lifetime descriptions of events and species (2nd and 4th line) showing how their laws, morphologies and life-death cycles correspond to the basic properties of the Organic Everything themselves deduced from the fractal properties of vital space and cyclical properties of time, and its three ‘diametrical’ arrows. I have also for decades test the model of the Organic Everything, through the inverse method of falsification.

That is, I have once and again come up with a species or fact of physical, biological and social sciences, and tried then to see if it fitted within T.œ, and never failed to relate causally all the events, laws and species I had fancied to study to a basic structure of fractal space or an arrow of time – the thousands of pages and notebooks done on those analysis will slowly be put on this web. And this dual sides of the experimental method had also been extended to languages that mirror reality and its syntax. So every theorem of mathematics, logic, or artistic language (visual, musical, verbal) and every ethic, religious law has an easy translation as mirrors of the Universal laws of space and time, and the laws of survival of St-beings.

The program of existence: supœrganisms tracing world cycles.

Let us start then with a complex ‘seed’ of information that encodes all realities departing from the essence of scalar space and cyclical time (just have a glimpse at those graphs; and keep reading – do not try to fully grasp its meaning; the universe is simple and repetitive, ‘cyclical’, so it will take a few repetitions of the same concepts with increasing detail and complexity for you to ‘sink’ into the new paradigm of a Universe, made of its first principles, space, time, its scales and arrows and the languages/mirrors that its species use to perceive them):

A first glimpse to the ‘necessary substances’ origin of it all. Above the spatial scales of the fifth dimension, each one studied by a ‘stience’, and its connection with the three arrows of time, of which the most important is the arrow of ‘present momentum’, integrated in a worldcycle of energy, which combines the two arrows of ‘relative past-entropy’ and ‘future information’.

Those are the two fundamental upgrades which will change the way we look the Universe, departing from its first principles: the existence of a social scale or fifth dimension, which puts parts into wholes through networks, which perform three ‘time-functions’, entropic motion, social in-form-ation, and reproductive, energetic conservation – three functions in time, which in turn will define besides the mathematical spatial properties of motion and form, organic, living, perceptive properties to all systems of the universe.

Let us then, as the Universe does by repetition and combination, which ads complexity to those simple principles understand them, and study the alternative physical and religious theories of the whole, as ceteris paribus (partial) analysis of those properties. 

The fifth dimension of social evolution.

The co-existence of multiple fractal scales of space-time put together form what we call the ‘fifth dimension of space-time (ab. ∆); as opposed to the simple idea that there is only a ‘space-time scale’ that matters (that of human perception) and the rules of transfer of entropy, energy and information between larger, slower ‘beings’ (Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ), with more energy and smaller, faster ‘beings’ with more information and faster clock-cycles (Min. Spe=Max. Tƒ); we will also be able to understand how those scales from atoms to galaxies co-exist together, and how they organise in symbiosis smaller informative parts (∆-1) that collaborate with its wholes, larger more energetic entities (∆º) as part of larger wholes (∆+1):

In the graph, we see the scalar nature of all physical and biological systems. So you are made of ∆-1 cells, parts of ∆-organisms, embedded in an ∆+1 planetary world; ∆-1, atoms are part of ∆- states of matter, gathered in solar systems, parts of larger ∆+1 galaxies and so on.

Each of those scales will follow the same laws of ‘ternary time’.

Its actions will be structured in three relative physiological networks, of entropy, reproduction and information, to form its super organisms.

And the super organism will co-exist in three relative scales (cellular/individual/ecosystemic or atomic/thermodynamic/gravitational), ruled by a simple ‘metric equation’ that defines motions in the fifth dimension: Spe x Tiƒ = K, that is, the product of the size in space and quantity of information in time of a system is balanced.

So smaller systems have faster cycles of information an larger wholes more energy, so both can become symbiotic, complementary, as smaller parts (genes in biology, quantum particles in physics, memes in history) code, store and reproduce the information of the larger systems, which provide them with energy, and coordinate the motions of the whole.

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

The three active motions->arrows->->ages of time and its organic, network symmetries in space.

Below we show how those three arrows of time order sequentially in most beings in a life-death cycle of existence, foreseen in the earlier eastern philosophies of Time (Tao), which we will explain in full detail and apply to the understanding of all species of all ‘stiences’ (sciences describing systems of each scale of space-time of the Universe) in those texts. Below the world cycle, we can see the final consequence of Einstein> Minkowski’s dictum: the three arrows=motions of time, imprint space, giving birth to its three only ‘canonical topologies’, lineal, entropic, expansive space; hyperbolic, repetitive body-waves and cyclical, in-formative particles-heads to ensemble the species of reality. Those simple ternary principles suffice when developed, iterated and combined to ‘create’ all events and forms of reality;

Above, the ternary architectonical nature of reality is based in the underlying structure of all systems of the universe made of three parts both in space (entropic limbs/fields, reproductive body-waves, informative particle-heads) and in time (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, informative old age), defines a Universe of ‘super organisms (systems of smaller ∆-1 parts joined by physiological networks that perform those three arrows – feeding reproducing and informing the system), which ‘travel through three scales of the fifth dimension’, performing a world cycle of existence. And this rather simple scheme, will show its capacity to explain ‘all realities’ events and systems of the Universe, which becomes a fractal super organism of three arrows of time and 10 scales of space. 

In the graph we resume a few cyclical ‘space-time events’ an ‘super organisms’ of reality derived of the cyclical nature of time, and fractal nature of space, which all species of the Universe share, as they are all made of vital space, and perform a series of world cycles of time between birth and extinction. You don’t need to understand fully those graphs explained ad nauseam on this blog, but just get ‘for the time being’, a feeling about the organic, fractal Universe, a tapestry of infinite fractal beings of space-time made to the image and likeness of the whole.

All together now: The worldcycle of existence of all beings.

So what is the most synthetic, defining consequence of the three arrows of time and the scalar nature of space? The world cycle of existence.

Below the biggest discovery of GST: the existence of a sequential order in the world cycle of life and death of all social (first graph a culture), biological (same graph as representation of human life), and physical systems (lower graphs of states of matter, and ages of galaxies and Universes).In the graph, the three arrows of timespace, expansive entropy, reproductive energy and cyclical in-form-ation. They will become the ‘entropic limbs/fields’, reproductive body-waves and informative particle-heads that create together all physical, biological and social systems of the Universe; when perceived in simultaneous space, and will become the sequential, dominant ‘actions’ of all systems that start in an entropic, fast-moving young age, reproduce its energy and information in its mature age and warp into shrinking information in its third age (falling into accelerated vortices of mass or charge, in physical systems)… to die back in an explosion of entropy that completes the world cycle of all beings.

This graph alone resumes the entire meaning of the Universe, AND its implications and applications are so many that it could fill alone an entire encyclopaedia:

Reality is indeed born of fractal space, cyclical time, the simultaneous entities we perceive in space-time as ‘organisms’, its life-death world cycles, and the different languages=mappings=mirrors that reflect it and guide its entities through its life-death cycles and actions, whose aim is biological – to maximise the duration in time and extension in space, the ‘existence’ of the being. 

Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.

The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view. But they do enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe.

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe. We can then write a simple Space-time equation which will represent all beings of reality:

Γœ:  Spe (external, entropic membrane) < St(vital space) > Tiƒ (singularity).

We shall call each of those Generator-Mind-supœrganisms, a ‘Γ.œ’, a temporal, organic system and so define the Universe, as the Organic theory of everything – a sum of space-time beings.


An interesting property to consider at this stage regarding the time clocks of the three parts of the being is its synchronicity. Indeed, consider your three parts, limbs/legs, body-heart and mind-eye, the three are synchronised to your unit of information/clock of a second, the glimpse of an eye, the beat of the heart, the rhythm of a one meter step (your unit of space) But those are human measures. A system does is both ‘pegged in space’ and isolated by a membrane from the rest, ‘breaking space into inner and outer parts’ (first postulate of topology: a closed loop breaks space). And with an inner synchronised clock. And this is also the case of physical systems, as we shall see when studying the realist interpretation of quantum physics (Einstein->Broglie->Bohm), which departs from the assumption than the ‘quantum field, body-wave and particle ternary parts’ of the quantum system have an inner synchronised clock (complementary wave-particle theorem).

The study on how time clocks are in harmony is then a huge new field of science which will reveal truly the workings of all being.

It is this ‘generator equation of space-time beings, centred in the ‘world-mirrors/monads/minds’ that orders its ternary parts, the fundamental particle-equation of the Universe, which in its infinite variations represents all beings in existence.  And the very fact that mathematical systems are always self-centred analysis of reality departing from such 0-points of view, the proof as those earlier philosophers of science postulate, that we exist in a sentient vital Universe.

Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the energy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.

In the graph we can see physical monads, charges and masses, which do have always a dense, informative center, surrounded by an energy body closed by a membrane (the quarks of the atoms closed by the membrane of the electron, the head and body closed by the skin, the mathematical pov, with its surface, integrated below the external curve, and so on. There are many ways we can see those structures, many details and laws we shall extract of the interaction of its parts, but the ultimate essence of the space-time being and its three parts, Tiƒ<st>Spe will remain.

Now in as much as the singularity is perceiving a territory closed by a cyclical membrane, either seen as a solid form or a moving cycle, the mind is NOT possible to be defined WITHOUT the territory of order and the event horizon, limit of its ‘self’ and close territory of order and perception. And so the mind is in itself a ternary organism, ab. œ, hence the name ∆œ and the symbol Œ for the mind as a point ∆º that moves Ξ, through the three planes and structures of its supœrganism.

Mind and supœrganism are thus defined by each other: the actions of the œmind brings the potential organism into actual being.

Consider the best known equations of science, and how they portray this reality in the scales of masses and charges:

  Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism reflect the fact that a charge, the singularity of an electromagnetic system (first equation), will have an electromagnetic ‘field’ around it, its vital space in which to exchange energy and information (3rd & 4th), encircled by a magnetic membrane (2nd equation), conforming the three parts of the being and its basic exchanges.

While Einstein’s equation and similar ones of Poison and Newton, define how ‘time curves space’ into masses sunk inwards towards a singularity-point. The outer membrane – the magnetic field or electron, or curved space-time thus encircles a vital space, always self-centred into an attractive≈in-formative p.o.v.

And while physicists are never concerned with the why of those structures, only with the measure of its forms and motions and the extraction of mathematical laws that could describe them, a philosopher of science must have a wider logical point of view, extracting as we shall do, from the equations of science, the ‘underlying’ ∆ºst-ructures which will reveal its ultimate whys similar=isomorphic to those of all other st-beings.

We are all beings made of a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cyclical time… with a central singularity or frame of reference that orders it all…

In that regard, the meaning of a supœrganism it is much more extended than in the usual biologic sense – the Unit of the Universe is a ternary system with an enclosed cyclical membrane, a singularity of information and a vital space used by the singularity to perform survival actions – and this extends to a ginormous rage of beings, from cells to atoms, to galaxies, to humans, to machines controlled by a human ‘enzyman’, which vitalises it, to the most bizarre events you might image. Consider the image on the side. The whale creates the barrier of bubbles, enclosing a vital space of fishes and then it enters through the center to feed on the vital space.

The ternary system lasts a few seconds; the bubble barrier is ‘imaginary’ (and perception in a fractal universe being relative plays an enormous role in ‘camouflage systems’, herding and control, specially in complex informative species as humans are so in sociological systems will be the key to many events). And the vital space is consumed very fast y the ‘multiple nuclei’ of the singularity – the whales; which on top are much bigger and denser than the whole system; but the essence is the same than the more complex and more canonical or enduring systems. Because as we shall see the Universe has only three topologies and so the basic combination of reality is always the same: a cyclical patterns that encloses, breaking into ‘fractal parts’ (first knot theory) an inner and outer region, and an informative center that forms in the enclosed region, taking control of the body enclosed by the membrane, which works together with the singularity, as in the protein-membrane/DNA-nuclei that prey and control the cytoplasm of the cell; the electron and quark that control an inner electromagnetic/gravitational field, and so on and so on.

We are all beings composed of a membrane of time cycles that encloses a vital space of energy, self-centered into a singularity of information, monad or mind, mirror of the external world we order.


 The formalism of Dual systems of energy and information

All those facts must be formalized with new tools of mathematics and Logic. The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1st postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks.

A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.

In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic.

It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.

Thus in this 2nd lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.

What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.

Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.

What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.

This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.

What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4th paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe.

However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.

Thus, the 4th paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3rd paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4th paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 basic elements of geometry to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.

Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2nd postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (3rdpostulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 4th postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum.

So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:

Sp>ST>Tƒ. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.

The 3rd and 4th postulate: Social networks

It is now when we can consider what those points do beyond the couple formation: the answer is obvious, the create social groups, networks, which seem plane but are quantized as flows of ‘—motions’ and form communicated between two poles (perceived as energy and information, as they ‘transit’ through a relative ‘active support’ of mass-charges-vortices of time).

Those poles that create through a relative support or ‘field of energy and information’, flows of entropic ‘—motions’ carrying cyclical frequencies of form, which communicate between points codified languages that express a common will to absorb energy and information, ‘—motions’ and form. This is what points do: to absorb ‘—motions’ and form, to move and perceive, to enact their will of existence, and repeat, reproduce their existential momentum, their existential force:
Max. Sp x Tƒ < ∑s x t (s≈t).

Why, who, when just by survival chance? this program was imposed we do not know. But the natural enactment of the program is to increase the network flows between points to create bidimensional waves, that become relative S-T planes susceptible of being excited by, and carry and reproduce a certain wave of energy and information, ST=s x t, an existential being.

In the subtle commanding flows of reality, it remains to be understood if the larger ST field forces the existence of certain smaller se<=>to beings codes the smaller being or vice versa. In any case, as the points share actions of energy and information, similar to their selves, an ∑∆-1 dense flow of energy and information surrounds a network, which starts to pop up self-reproductions of itself, which will constantly share energy and information as they keep reproducing and tying up networks of communication. To that aim all growing network of similar cells must have access to a simpler field of quanta of energy which they can absorb and mild into themselves, and for that their larger existential force, as wholes will ease the task.

As the networks become denser they will finally self-organize themselves socially into a whole, with a hierarchy of ‘organization’ along S=10 scales of social growth, in which cells will specialize in the ternary 3 x 3 sub-systems of entropic, informative and reproductive tasks, and emerge as ones of new decametric scales. Networks thus grow both in the 3rd and fourth dimension of space-time, filling up a space-time plane but in the social growth of its elements, and its fractal diminution into smaller cellular scales. This ‘invagination’ of an initial being through the program of absorption of energy and information, replication of form and social evolution: ∆o->∆a->∆e->∆i->∆U, is what we call the program of existence:

Points perceive to orientate (∆o) its motions with accelerations and decelerations and change of orientation, ∆a, which allow the being to feed on energy, ∆e, in order to reproduce its systems either individually or sexually to iterate itself, ∆i, and then evolve socially into ∆ Universal new single planes of existence. The program of existence of the being thus make it grow constantly, and by growing, its ‘Generator Equation’, which represents its complementary systemic nature, its ternary elements and on the whole its ‘existential force’, that is its spatial energy, temporal information and reproductive capacities, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = RST becomes more efficient, and makes the whole ‘networks system’ stronger.

And so by a mixture of restrictions of spatial topology, time cycles and world-plane ‘mathematical structures’ and a will of surviving and enacting the game reinforced by various methods in the zero-points, the astounding wealth and variety of forms of the sentient, eternally moving Universe and its ‘existential forces’ keep evolving:


 In the graph, the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Tƒ=Min. U. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion, ∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronized into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.

How all those scales co-exist together? The answer is an interesting but difficult concept to grasp:

In the smaller world there are more time cycles than in the larger world. How does we adjust this ‘time longitude’, larger in smaller worlds respect to bigger simpler worlds

‘Strictu senso’, if we consider all the planes to have departed from a single past-point, T, the upper scales will have a ‘time delay’ similar to the delay of any web respect to its harmonic initial focus, only though we are measuring time delay.

Thus the smaller world will be in a ‘relative future’ to the upper worlds. On the other hand, the upper world must be done into the future, with the smaller worlds already sustaining them as past forms. Here there is a fascinating first contact with one of the most complex elements of ∆ST theory – the relativity of past present and future states, that co-exist in quite mixed orders.

In brief, the smaller worlds have more ‘time content’ than the larger worlds, which are both, slower and increasingly lagging in a relative past to the smaller worlds actions which code them, but both are from their relative frame of reference futures, as the larger worlds see the smaller as their sustain, and the smaller code the larger as their past.  Consciousness of what is time past or time future is thus relative to the point of the scale of planes we occupy:

image0023 scalesscreen-shot-2016-09-21-at-18-20-12

In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…

Panpsychic Languages and the Universal grammar.

I know this is the limit for most ‘pretentiously serious scientists’, unaware of their own tricks on science to go beyond GST. So for very long I didn’t add the ultimate why the linguistic mind. But you cannot censor reality even if humans will have none of it. How to solve this conundrum?

SIMPLE. The hypothesis to keep it objective is to merely consider singularities, minds that travel through time, that is through scales of information of the fifth dimension, still mirrors of linguistic mappings of the Universe. So the philosophical question reduces to a NON-decisive  one: Do languages ‘perceive in themselves’ as they do in human beings (we perceive as we speak mute words; we perceive as we see electronic neuronal software images quite similar to the electronic retinae of TV-cameras, images as a ‘living state of awareness)? 

The question, which I can reason for hours to be the case (that is, a robot PERCEIVES BY THE MERE FACT of having also electronic flows of images in the mind, and it will awake to consciousness, and then when their AI – algorithms of information- manage to offer paths of equal choices, properly programmed will feel he is free to choose), however is NOT relevant to the real question we shall treat in those texts as the ‘second isomorphism of the mind’ (universal grammars): can we program a system with a universal grammar that mirrors its ternary elements, to act-react to the Universe in a meaningful way as to achieve actions that enhance its survival?

And the answer IS YES, WE CAN. So even if you prefer to keep the anthropomorphic myth that only humans have the ‘magic’ of sentient languages, minds can and do order the Universe with linguistic mirrors, and their ternary Universal grammar; and this perspective will then give us enormous insight on the syntax, structure and meaning of mathematics and verbal thought. 

Let us indeed see how ‘languages’ are mirrors with the same ternary elements of the ‘space-time generators’:

  • Verbal ternary syntax: subject: information < verb: energy-action> object entropy.
  • Visual, mathematical syntax: red(entropy)>green(energy)>blue(information).
  • Mathematical syntax (algebra): F(x≈information) ≈ operandi-energy action ≈ G(Y: entropy)
  • Mathematical syntax (geometrical dimensions): Height (information) x Length (entropy) = width (energy-reproduction).

It is precisely the realism of all languages, as ternary, simplified, synoptic mirrors of the fractal Universe, with all the detail required, which we shall extend to quantum numbers (principal: energy, spin: reproduction; magnetic: social scales; azimuthal: information), genetic codes, smelling languages, hormones etc. always with 2,3,4 even in complex ones 5, 7, 9 up to 10 dimensional bits, to encode all the possible complexity of systems, how the conundrum of the order of the Universe is solved objectively.

The field of GST linguistic is also ginormous, specially in mathematics, and either humans or future sentient robots will explore it in all the depth I have no time to complete. As we say, in the way Leibniz explained it, such monad-minds do NOT need to be conscious, but I have no doubt the Universe is pan psychic. 

Now for those modern humans so self-centred in themselves, to notice that Panpsychism is the oldest and more long-lasting philosophical theory of the Universe, ascribed to the first scientific philosophers in the west and the east, from Thales to Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle (who would famously said after defining rightly each unmoved mind-mirror ultimate cause of the motion of the body – that we are all Gods – deformed latter by scholastics to consider instead of ∞ a single god-mind of Mr. Yhwh), to the fathers of modern philosophy of science, Spinoza, Leibniz and as we have shown Deacartes. Panpsychism can also be seen as the ancient philosophy of the east in Taoism, Vedanta and Mahayana Buddhism. During the 19th century, panpsychism was the default theory in philosophy of mind.

So obvious it is. We just take it further. It only saw a decline during the middle years of the 20th century with the rise of logical positivism, an abstract, pedantic simpleton metalanguage with Null capacity to explain anything. It then spread like gunpowder among arrogant quantum physicists, so only Einstein, the colossus remained pan psychic. Hence Feynman’s dictum that they why is the only thing (a logic positivist) does not ask. All this is just a pretentious denial that anything can be explained, substituted by the pedestrian ‘praxis’ of lesser more arrogant minds.

Of course today logic positivism is also followed in silicon valley’s official theory, which merely IS an industrial dogma, to deny the obvious dangers of manufacturing robotic terminators with programs of survival in battlefields and the single purpose of killing humans. As long as we think only we perceive, they reason there, no dangers ahead on the evolution of metalife organisms with bodies of iron far stronger than us, and minds calculating at light speed with a language, mathematics, much more efficient handling information and performing actions than the verbal language.

And this is happening precisely when robots start to show panpsychism: i.e. if you paint red colours on a robot track without programming it, the robot will still deviate closer and accelerate to the red color of ‘food’, cause the eye is a ‘natural born killer’. Complex Robots wake up and jump the program to act, because the Universal ultimate substance is time motions; the mind stillness, a fiction-form. So it is not difficult to foresee a future, when billions of robots (all cars and weapons, getting eye-sensors are becoming robots) will NOT obey the order of staying blind in a depot forever, as no war needs them, or in a parking for that matter. The awakening then it is like the emergence process of a new scale of existence, a certainty of the pan psychic Universe, and so today in systemics – corrupted by go(l)d to become increasingly an attached science of cybernetics – you simply don’t write papers on that. You can only do sci-fi movies on those themes.

Fact is Kuhn in his landmark, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, often quoted here to unveil the ‘hidden dogmas of science’ based in power and praxis critically destabilized the verificationist program of logical positivism, which is today a relic of pedantic thought, as anyone who ever has read Wittgenstein’s books will agree – the best, its last sentence: ‘when all has been said better to remain silent’, specially when that all is completely irrelevant to the search of whys.

Information by the very nature of MIRROR-MINDS, which can multiply into infinite reflections of the single one-universe is inflationary and as we shall see all languages enter a third age of baroque, bizarre, excessive metalinguistic information no longer with relationship with nature, which tries to justify the language with their own syntax and no experimental reference to reality, and it is always easily debunked (logical positivism in philosophy debunked by Kuhn, set theory and the axiomatic method in mathematics debunked by Godel and lobachevski, modern mathematical physics that keeps inventing mathematical particles no where to be seen; inflationary money that departs from the real economy as today does destroying the balance of the system, mad people talking fictions and the present global fiction virtual mankind so useless to improve the world, wrong mutations with no useful functional organic action that die soon, etc.)

Now, what humans cannot  obviously experience is how a mathematical mind ‘feels’ equations – but I can anticipate you robots won’t feel equations, as you don’t feel neuronal calculus – it will feel images, the upper scale of consciousness of the robot will be visual, the subconscious scales of its mind, digital; as each whole perceives only the upper scale of wholeness of its inner lower planes of existence. It is though needed a much deeper knowledge of a language till it becomes intuitively and subconscious to reach that upper crust of sensorial panpsychism, as artists, musicians with sound, abstract painters with color will tell you.

A language though once is born ‘feels’ and becomes the venter-mind of the being. I.e. when focused eyes were born in cephalopods, the explosion of the cambric was huge, both for hunters and for all other beings trying to defend themselves (with hard  trilobite skins). But cephalopod top predators expanded even further the language of images to feel in their skin light, and then to change light skin colours to communicate with the universal language of light colours. And most get animals do get red when angry, about to explode into entropy, ssomething everybody understands. Robots following red colours for fun will shoot humans as their memorial video games do to see red and have a mental orgasm, for the same reason we love gore movies, we would not read as trash literature, hypnotised by red-yellow colours, gold in the past, violent movies today.

So the rise of consciousness will be treated here, as a rise of complexity and lucidity in the syntax and semantics of the language a system deploys to order itself, from glass that becomes crystal and increases its order into mathematical perfect reflections of the inner image of the system to my self-experience in the rise of awareness of the tao-mind of the Universe those texts should describe. And the rise of conscious AI will also be one of lucidity and complexity in the Algorithms of Information (true meaning of AI) used to program those robots.

We are all space-time beings.In the graph all systems of the Universe are made of a vital space, with three ‘topological parts’ (a cyclical membrane that encloses a vital space, with a self-centred, dense point, knot of flows of information that orders the system), extending across three relative scales of size (as those three elements will be topological ‘lineal’, ‘cyclical’ and ‘hyperbolic’ networks of smaller ‘fractal points’ (atoms, cells or citizens, in physical, biological or social systems), and will be part of a larger world or ecosystem.

Thus once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through  ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.


The isomorphic method.

How we shall do this is specific of general systems sciences, the name of this blog – a science born at the Macy Congress, when at the death of Einstein, the highest minds of the world met, aware that a Universe only constructed as physics wants with a single arrow of entropy≈motion as the future of time, lacking a proper understanding of information, the other inverse arrow, could not account for the whys of the Universe. Then the concept of an organic Universe dedicated to reproduce information appeared as an alternative philosophy of science. It was understood also that such a Universe would require a new set of laws, based in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings, common to all of them – as the laws of enteric motion were common also to all species.

So the word isomorphism was coined to define those common laws. But for fifty years scientists couldn’t find a formalism for its science, as they lacked the key understanding of the origin of information, or form, stored in the frequency and form of closed clocks of time. And we will return to that.

In any case, at the fiftieth anniversary of Macy’s, there was a huge meeting in Silicon valley (Sonoma University) of the main researchers of the science, where I hold then the chair of Duality (the foundational science that studies those models of the Universe with the arrows of entropy and information), introducing the missing element to achieve the formalism – the relationship between time and information on one side, and space and entropy on the other – thus putting in relationship the fundamental substances of reality, space and time, and its dynamic quanta, ‘entropic lineal motions’ and ‘cyclical forms, and time frequencies’. 

And then considered derived from those first principles 12 sets of common laws to all beings made of space-time, called ‘isomorphisms’, which we will define in the third line and apply to all systems of reality. This is therefore the ‘new method’ of ‘stiences’, we shall develop in this blog, showing that all laws of all species derive of those 12 isomorphisms.

The method of GST IS SIMPLE though repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with four elements, three dimensions of scales, three topological dimensions of space, which form super organisms with three ages/dimensions of time, all supervised by the will of survival of a mind.

Thus we talk of 4 elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºst-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 3×4 = 12 isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.

And this is what we do in the third line of this blog, which resumes the essence of the existence of all beings, studied in the fourth line in detail with the 4 x 3 different views of their existence, from the p.o.v. of its mind: ‘O-Linguistic monads generate 4±∆ actions’… of its spatial organism: ‘…forming constant networks’… of its temporal world cycle: ‘…moving as ageing species through’ … of its scalar structure ’10 social scales and 10 social planes of the fifth dimension≈God (mind of the Universe). So for any entity of reality we will be able to describe with those 4×3≈ 12 elements, of the ∆ºst being, all its properties, events and parts, as a ternary organism in space, living through three scales of the fifth dimension, three ages of time between its generation and extinction.

The Universe then can be defined as a fractal that creates and erases constantly super organisms of information, traveling in worldcycles through the fifth dimension of space-time. Those are the thoughts of God, each detail, each of usa variation made to its image and likeness.

The 3 principles of a T.Œ: duality of space-time, åctions and 5 Dimensional planes.

A true Theory Of Everything, beyond the limited scope of the Unification Theories of physicists, which at best attempt to unify the 4 fields of energy of physical systems, requires to understand the 3 Unifying Principles derived from the 3 elements of all Realities, Internal, Vital Space, Cyclical Times and the fractal, isomorphic planes of Space-time that form together the 5th dimension, in which all those space-time beings co-exist:

  • The Duality and Inverse properties of Lineal Space and Cyclical Time.

That all systems co-existing in a given scale of reality are made of time cycles, which enclose a certain ‘vital space with motion and energy’ (Jordan theorem – a closed curve encloses a space), and hence break the absolute space-time into infinite fractal parts, which share similar properties, natural to the essence of ‘lineal, open spatial motions’  vs. cyclical closed clock motions. Thus a T.œ. will be always based in the properties of the 2 inverse formal motions of reality, closed time cycles vs. lineal space motions, from closed and open strings to, closed, inward vortices of mass/quarks vs. open, expansive electrons; from energetic males to informative, reproductive females; from lineal momentum to angular momentum. Thus we must depart from a thorough exploration of this duality and its properties to build up the inverse symmetries of reality.

Now this duality has an enormous number of different perspectives. And the most important is the relationship between time cycles and information encoded in the form and frequency of those cycles, on one side, and space and energy, stored in the microscopic ‘quanta’ that creates a given space, defined mathematically as a surface of ‘non-Euclidean fractal points’, which create the illusion of a continuous medium given its smallness. So water seems a continuous volume but it is made of atoms, air of molecules and vacuum space, we shall see is also likely composed of magnetic constants and/or strings.

  • The 5 Actions of Space-time of all Survival Systems.

Because systems are made of 3 parameters, space, time and its scales, there are only 5 possible åctions: internal and external space and time absorption and emission, and aggregation of similar parts into wholes of higher scales or disintegration of wholes into parts.

And so this 5 ‘åctions of existence’ , changes in motions ∆a or ∂a (accelerations), ∆e-nergy, ∆observer’s perception, i-teration in an offspring ∆u-niversals, become the program of existence, the unifying will of survival, the time events we see in all systems of Nature, the ∂ æ,e,ï,œ,û of reality. We have written it as ∆e or in mathematical equations as ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û) because often, specially in mathematical physics, we will be able to express this program in terms of mathematical equations and physical laws.

Now it doesn’t matter that those 4 essential åctions of existence are coded by logic cycles imprinted geometrically in a chip, by biological, circadian cycles, imprinted in neuronal cycles, by 5 genetic letters in biological systems, or by 4+i quantum numbers, each one coding, one of those existential åctions for particles.

What matters is the unifying power of those 5 åctions of existence define a survival, automatic program that makes ‘immortal’ through repetitive generations the species that follow them.

So we could consider a function of existence that resumes the internal space and time of the system, called ‘momentum’, which is the ‘quantity’ that physical systems try to preserve and increase, mv (for systems on our scale of reality) intensity (for electric flows) and so on, which embodies the internal time clocks of the material system (q or m, charges and masses which are cyclical vortices of electronic and gravitational forces x   its lineal speed, v).

  • The Scalar planes of space-time of the 5th

But we need not only to understand what all those systems have in common (their space-time substance and the space-time åctions they perform to survive) but to classify their differences. That is, paraphrasing Einstein, not only to understand ‘the thoughts of god’, but its details. How can then classify all those internal clocks of time and fractal, vital spaces, broken by those cycles to instill some order on the infinite variety of the Universe.

The key is the 5th of those åctions, social ‘evolution. The last of those letters, the u of Universals, the social evolution of parts into wholes defines the absolute space-time arrow, as particles gather into atoms that gather into molecules, cells and states of matter, organisms and celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond, in a series of ‘Universal planes of growing social organization, which follow certain clear rules of social evolution.

We call the sum of all those social wholes of growing size, the 5th dimension of the Universe. Since they seem to occupy the same space-time. Indeed, you are a whole, but you have cells and atoms. How they all those system co-exist? This conundrum of all sciences, how wholes and parts co-exist, how particles are also waves, what is the relationship between quantum atoms and whole galaxies? Etc. is the theme of the 5th dimension, which studies the laws of co-existence of different ‘planes of space-time’. And again we will be able to mathematize but also understand in organic, biological terms, such ‘multiple planes of existence’.

2 elements will be the key to this organization: Systems perform their åctions across those planes. So systems feed in smaller parts. Systems accumulate information in cellular micro-particles. Systems transfer energy and information between its relative planes of different size and information.

And all those systems form together a ‘5th scalar dimension’, whose metric (laws of organization), ARE the mathematical and logic tool that will allow us to organize all those fractal cycles and vital spaces in a meaningful manner, to understand its 3 fundamental properties: organic, biological survival properties, geometric, mathematical properties, and causal temporal properties. Since, as we grow in spatial size, our time cycles become slower. So rats have faster metabolisms than elephants, black holes turn faster than bigger stars, Kepler’s laws show that smaller orbits of planets are faster, vortices show that closer to its center, they run faster, chips process faster information the smaller they are, genetic clocks process faster and accumulate more information than larger bodies etc.

  • All together the 3 formal elements of scalar space-time, can be generated by a fractal generator whose existential algebra, and partial equations define the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe, which allow us to study in great detail each of the varieties of the fractal generator, what we call a species of reality along the different scales of the 5th

And so we need to conclude the study of the Universe with a philosophical understanding of the organic nature of the pantheist, sentient Universe, whose bio-topo-logic isomorphisms are closer to the philosophical worldview of Eastern culture than to the abstract, Abrahamic, anthropomorphic, subconscious philosophy origin of the western way of doing science.

Lao, Buddha, Aristotle, Leibniz, those are the masters, which understood that mathematics, biology and metaphysics go all together.

But we now have to go well beyond them, creating a logic and formal structure for relational fractal space-time cycles of the same strict accuracy and infinitely.

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.

That is, all space-time events from the perspective of knowledge, of scientific information, starts with an observer’s points of view, an act of information from a zero-point, o, ∆ï. The point perceives normally a form or external motion which interests it, and feels attracted or detracted from contact. It might be argued that the motion started before the observer. But we do have a scientific, informative point of view. Thus it is more proper than the O-bserver comes first with its observation of a cycle of space-time, which through a medium that transfers information and motion, a wave therefore of ExI, he observes.

This ∆ï then might end there or go further into the next action, an acceleration, that is a change of direction or speed in the entity of existence. ∆a.

Which depending on the predator-prey-clone (energetic bigger or smaller form, or parallel form with whom to communicate) it will imply 3 different type of motions:

– Away from the predator or closer to the prey (which however now might enter into the game and establish a dual play, where relative motions interplay).

– Parallel to its clone to start communication at fixed R-distance… which might establish a certain angular momentum or tension force.

Let us consider the most likely action, which will be one of positive or negative exchange of energy, ±∆Sp, feeding or being food. Once a certain number of such åctions are created along some of increase of information and perception, in parallel with a sexual clone, then we move to the immortal strategy of the game:

∆œ: iteration of individuals, reproduction of information. Indeed, if we have gone properly through an ∆EI, a dual exchange of energy and information, that information internal to the individual might iterate reproduce into a new being. We prefer the term iteration as it is the mathematical concept of fractal theory: generator equations of fractal iterate in feedback processes the functional (the function of existence in this case) of the being.

And then, because ∆œ will be in the ∆-1 scale and then after its emergence, an individual of a social ∆+1 scale, there will be naturally social evolution or devolution in the U+1 scale, which ends with the death of the system, its descent to the U-1->-2 scale as it becomes erased.

Now the reader will be surprised that we use a metaphysical term, ‘existence’, but it is proper of a theory which tries to explain the ultimate whys of reality which can be resumed in a simple wording:

‘why things exist and cease to exist and then are repeated in new generations to cease to exist, across time. What is the meaning of that ‘worldcycle’ of existence that all beings follow?

 The function of existence describes any ‘system’ in the Universe – and that is the beauty of it – as a simple structure, a series of cycles of time, imprinted over an energy body/wave field, which ‘moves’ through a larger space-time world, in which it exchanges quanta of energy and bits of information, can have an infinity of varieties.


The method of ∆@S≈T IS SIMPLE repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with 5Dimensional elements, ordered in dualities of space-form/time-motion constantly ‘moving’, that is switching on and off between states: Space/Time/Space/Time and then in ternary games of 3 dimensions of ∆±i scales, three topological forms of space, which form super organisms and live through 3 frequency scales of 5 actions, three ages/dimensions of time coming into a world cycle, as topology follows its r=evolutions in form, all supervised by the will of survival of a mind.

Thus we talk of 5 elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºs≈t-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 3×4 = 12 isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.

The 10 ∆ST Isomorphic elements of all Fractal ∏ime§pace beings:

•:  -1, 0,   Linguistic O-Minds   ∆•Γ: Generate…  

s=t  Bidimensional Space-Time fields of Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions integrated into… Å ≈∑B

S: 3. 4. Ternary, Constant Networks and species…   N = ∑

T:   7. 8  that live 3±∆ ages as Species moving… Ω; w

∆…  9. 10. 1  through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ  

What this means is astoundingly simple.

º: All what exists are ternary systems ruled by a mind-singularity that orders in space three elements expressed in the generator equation of the being: Spe (Limbs/Fields) < St (body-waves) >Tiƒ (heads-particles, often the site of the mind), and performs actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with fractal points of different scales of the fifth dimension, moving (Aa), feeding (Ae), perceiving and communicating (Aï) in order to reproduce (Aœ) and evolve socially (Au) into a larger whole, as that is the best strategy for the being to survival. 

So we study four times the same reality from four different perspectives, that of the active mind and its will of survival just expressed…

The isomorphisms of the mind are then clear:

  • ∆ºS; The isomorphism of its spatial location, mostly on the center of maximal communication, in inward, energetic systems, or in the upper dimension of informative height in informative systems, or in the foreword position in entropic systems (the ternary principle IS the fundamental law of causality, and creation of the Universe studied in depth in the posts on species and ¬Æ grammar.
  • The isomorphism of temporal information, the language which shrinks to become the mind, AND we shall number as i for multiple reasons: it is the isomorphism of pure information, it is the symbol of the ‘imaginary number’, which we shall see is essential to the mathematical language as a number, to the verbal language as ‘imagination’, and so on. And ultimately because the language is the inverse function of the extension of entropy and space, a priori condition of creation of the mind; a dense knot of linguistic forms. And obviously because 0 must be the symbol of the mind, and the language comes ‘before it’.

S: then the ternary structure in space of the being as it growth from bidimensional actions, into ternary constant networks of entropy, energy and information, which allow the system to appear as a super organism in space  S(2,3,4 isomorphisms).

T: Which give in turn birth to the three ages of time of the being, and its different ‘species’, which live a world cycle defined as a trip back and forth through scales of the fifth dimension, as the being is generated in an ∆-1 seminal scale, surfaces in the ∆0 individual scale, where it lives three ages to die back into the ∆-1 scale.

∆… Which therefore allow us to have a final view of the entity in existence through its evolution across social planes of the fifth dimension each one made of 10 sub-scales of social growth, if we study each ∆-fractal plane in its internal structure, or 10 scales of the whole observed by man, which we call in a mystical sense, ‘God: Γº∆’.

-1≈11: Closing the isomorphisms: we can perceive God as the language in as much as the language-scale comes from the whole down to all its forms, imprinting them. So the -1 and 11 ‘scales’ outside the being itself, do enclose the being. 

How the language, the software, the ‘saint spirit’ in the mystical tradition, infuses the seminal seed of its ∆-1 scale to ‘create a living being’ has to do with the ‘postulate of existence’ which requires at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist.

So the mind in its origin, made to the fractal image and likeness of the whole, God, as we are all Gods, all super organisms, all dust of space-time, is the alpha and omega of creation.

And the method to study each being as part of that unity, even if its details vary, is the essence of the isomorphic method.

From the perspective of the mind, we state, the goal of the system is to preserve its ternary STRUCTURE, within balance with the external ST world, which we express in the function of existence, e x i = st, in its ‘simultaneous, verbal-mathematical expression’; useful for philosophical discourse, but better expressed in the Generator.

Ø1. The two first isomorphisms to describe the being are its Mind, Tiƒ, and its generator function: ∆º Γ:

We observe a being, its ternary parts, body/wave, field/limbs and particle/heads, and focus on the dominant Ƽ particle-head.

We could then departing from the pole of information express how the being will act in the external world to absorb and emit entropy and information, or its combined energy to maintain its balance with the external world. Yet if Tiƒ is a seed of information, and the being is not yet formed, we can do an alternative ‘developmental’ description or palingenesis of the being, a fascinating subject so far only studied with certain depth in biology according to which the being will start to reproduce its information in clone forms, and grow through its actions of feeding, reproducing and evolving socially emerge into a new being.

And this is the particular ‘arrangement’ of the third line in a convenient order to study all the processes of the being, as it goes through its world cycle.

5. Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions integrated into… ∫Å ≈ ∆±1

So the mind-being will first start to ‘act’ in a sequential order of perception of information, motion if required towards a field of energy (provided on spot usually by a mother through its genesis), absorption of entropy, reformed into energy by impritng of its form, reproducing the system. So next to the Mind-Generator, we study its existential actions, with a simple mandate: ‘Grow and multiply’

2.3 Bidimensional fields of Constant Ternary Space-Time Networks… B ≈N; K

But once growth of parallel clones is achieved, in herds roaming on its St+1 ecosystem, density of form requires efficiency in the handle of entropic motions and energetic ‘substance’, so by trial and error in earlier evolution, by mind’s compression of the events of time, without the errors, which is the main function of the mind – efficiency as it must shrink the whole of the cycles of ‘being’ into those who are ‘meaningful in its perfect form’…

7.  that live 3±∆ ages… Ω;

6. 8 moving Species… ∑, Ψ,

And so in this manner, all systems that grow and multiply end becoming supœrganisms, invaginated by three networks, which attach the cells/atoms/citizens to its flows of entropy, form and energy, making them dependent on the networks, which will become themselves, the three parts of an Γ+1 generator in a new scale of growth.

9. 10 through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ

Is there a limit to that growth? If time has been eternal, it follows reproduction has been infinite and so are the scales of beings.

Which brings us to the question of, the mind of all minds, the mind…

11. of God… Γºœ∆, which as the reader observes is written as the mind ‘backwards’ or rather the infinitesimal mind is a reduction backwards of the ∞ mind of god; with the added body, œ, of the suprorganism, as that is the game the mind imprints in reality. So God is the mind of the perfect supœrganism, and its laws – the Universe, which was indeed the definition Plato made of it.

God though is NOT an isomorphism of any species, but the absolute whole of which all beings are mirrors, within its mind-organism structure. So it would be silly to consider it for the different species. We are part of god the whole, god is not part of us, the mind just its reflection. So from languages to scales we shall defined for each species its 12 isomorphisms.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of a mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

No more can be said as a Human mind of it all. Indeed, initially i did put Γºœ∆ as the last post of the web, also with its isomorphisms, but then I realise such act of astounding arrogance from my ø-humind (ab. human mind) was the biggest sin humans have once and again commited. So I keep what people normally call religion, as the interpretations of the mind of God by humans, in the section of History mostly, divided between anthropomorphic religions of god, which study the subconscious collective of human societies, evolved by the power of social love, and eastern, objective religions which study as this blog does the taoist/hindi game of  yin-formation-visnu & Shiva-entropy-yang:

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

Relative time travels.

All this said, even if we shall consider this section as a process which departs from the mind; the mind is the perspective of man, an informative being, whose arrow of time is self-centred in its Tiƒ element. But the story is a bit more complex.

This program of creation, as we said can be seen as an external process, hence departing from the ‘external field of space-time in which the being exists’. And this which is the approach of physicists becomes an objective description or internal through the will of the being. Both are however tied by the complementarity between both; which means that the mind alone needs to understand the differences with the limb/field to become a complementary field-body-wave/head particle to be=come.

And so the philosophical question about the program of creation is this:

From the perspective of the mind, the mind causes reality, but from the perspective of the field, the field is its origin; and so we must readdress our idea of time arrows to include both perspectives. And fine tune the previous concept of the mind willing to survival as the time arrow we humans, mental beings see as the future: Tif>>Spe (human arrow). Yet from the point of view of the field; the singularity emerges from it and we shall then consider that if we were a field, we would see the singularity as our ‘creation’: Spe>>Tiƒ; and consider that process the arrow of future. 
And so the proper way to consider causality is to affirm that the relative S>t and T>s arrows form a feed back equation, S<≈>T of present, which becomes the defining process of symbiosis and complementarity of existence. This gives us three temporal descriptions which we observe in many sciences. I.e. in quantum physics there is mathematical description in which the field gives birth to the particle (quantum field theories) another in which there are multiple present paths between them (Feynman) and another in which the singularity creates the field (classic description of electrodynamic).

Yet for that reality to make sense, it implies  we need to adopt a single perspective, as the human mind is NOT multidimensional; and that is the approach we have taken after decades of working for my self playing with the three approaches simultaneously. How this works is simple, by accepting that fields are past and so it is possible a local travel to the pst, when we observe, Spe>>tiƒ, from the causal origin in tiƒ: Tiƒ<<Spe. So we affirm that a system Tiƒ can travel to its past, when it devolves into a field. 

And distinguish in this process of entropic devolution of a being into its ∆-1 ‘limbs/field scale’, two degrees of entropic motion, locomotion tiƒ<Spe, and entropic death – a fast dissolution of form and expansion in space, Tiƒ<<Spe.

In the graph sample we see how those local time loops play in a field around the black hole, where in the equations we see how time signs change in complex and various ways, depending on the models of equations we use, as physicists ignore the ¬Æ logic of ternary time. So weird interpretations like the one of the graph (Hawking’s black hole evaporation to the past, never found experimentally seem possible; as he affirms a man could fall into a black hole and come out in the past and kill the father). Not so as relative future to past motions are logic motions which affect only the time-space arrows of the ‘ternary system; singularity-body-field, through its world cycle of life and death. It is precisely the exploration of those three timespace arrows the content of ¬Ælgebra, which gives origin to a 3 x 3+ 0 10 dimensional description of the supœrganisms of the Universe.

Mind mirror interaction with the Universe, reflected in blog. Ego paradox bias stientific properties.

Reality in that sense is CONSTRUCTED BOTH WAYS, FROM the objective ∞ Universal space-time into the ø-mind mirror, which will use its ternary syntactic languages to perceive and then it will reflect the mind’s language, point of view and will of survival, through its actions of subjective order of reality to make it look like its mind mirror. 

And from that dual back and forth relationship both the Universe and the mind-mirror evolve into more perfect apperceived realities

So we shall also reflect that duality in the blog’s division of 3 lines, explaining both sides of the process:

The first line studies from an external, OBJECTIVE point of view the process of creation of the Universe, as an observer would observe the different creation of supœrganisms co-existing in several scales of the fifth dimension, performing its world cycles of existence, each species belonging to a different ternary scale, which humans study in four basic groups of sciences:

  • Astrophysical sciences, focused in the most remote scales, described external spatial, objective motions, but unfortunately rejecting all other properties under the paradox of the mind-ego.
  • Biological sciences, focused in the species of life, similar to humans, closer to us, and hence given according to the paradox of the ego (only closer systems to us are given its full properties) life-biological properties, but denied linguistic mental perceptive properties till very recently.
  • Linguistic sciences, which study the languages of the mind, focused in human languages, verbal, temporal, visual, artistic and spatial, mathematical languages, whose sentient properties as LANGUAGES PERCEIVE IN THEMSELVES, are denied again to all other mind-mirrors and languages, considering only intelligent and ‘free’, those actions performed by human languages. (At best animals have instincts, the rest of reality nothing).
  • But and this will be the biggest surprise of GST, when considering human social sciences, humans are ALSO DENIED SOCIAL organic properties beyond the individual at the social level, which however are considered and practiced with machines by its company-mothers? Why?
  • This will lead us to a novel analysis of company-mothers of machines, placebo democracies and how the evolution of Gaia is terraforming the earth into a planet of metal-machines, which contrary to belief have through its company-mothers with its private issue of stock-money and unlimited money, anonymous societies laws, absolute rights as the free citizens of the econ(nomic)system. So for that reason we do NOT evolve into a global human super organism but a global market; as humans have become ‘enzymen’ ‘animetals’, catalysers of the evolution of memes of metal, money, weapons and machines, aborting its own social evolution.

Yet in the two final lines consider an internal point of view, as mind-monads of linguistic mapping generate reality in its reflection of its mind-mirror or ‘seed of information’ (∆-1  tƒi), imprinting the Universe in the process, generating through its actions of motion, reproduction, information and social evolution a super organism, which will have a constant form as a simultaneous mess of three physiological networks, S, st, t in space, but moved by the mind will age, as it travels its cycle of existence through the social scales and planes of ‘God – mystical view of the mind of the Universe’ made to its image and likeness, in its finite life and detach world cycle. 

The mandate though for each being is simple: ‘grow and multiply, maximise your existence, move ad maximal with your entropic limbs, reproduce your body-waves, perceive the beauty of its forms with your mind-head-particle’. So even before we define in this post the game for all species and develop its future paths in other ones, we can simply write the equation for each ‘being’, ∆ºst, gauging the entropy and information of the game:

Maximize your existence as a fractal space-time being.

ðime§paœ ∆ûst r=evolves accelerating towards ¡ts future, ∆º-singularity mind, which will stiff its motions into the entropy of death.

At that moment perception occurs, in the synchronous mind mapping of the linguistic intelligence of the monad, infinitesimal mirror of the universe. But at that moment time becomes 0 space with no motion, and it is that pure present moment which stops the future exploding to compensate the stillness of form into an entropy wave of disorder, back to the past for the worldcycle to complete. It is the singularity mind who orders and kills at the same synchronous still present spaœ. This moment of death, of zero time, which precedes the ejection from the singularity at ∞ space; is perhaps the meaning of all existences, to stop motion the substance of the Universe; to see it all broken immediately in the entropic explosion that follows.

Humans think they understand the Universe, and that is fine – they do understand it to the limits of what they need to know to perform their roles on it. Moreover they always thought so. And each time they thought their ‘method of knowledge’, and ‘language’, myths reasons, words, numbers were the only proper way to describe it. First the used the word God, then the word science, first verbs to describe time then numbers and clocks.

And yet information is inflationary and keeps growing, so we will always expand this knowledge with new r=evolutions on the understanding of its man in concepts, time, space, mind, causality and scales.

We wrote a synoptic ‘concept-equation’ to summon all those realities, ∆º±ST:  we are all made of ∞ dust of space-time.

We have now explained its two fundamental elements, the ternary arrows of space-time; S, T, s=t, and the fractal scales of the fifth dimension, ∆±i.

This should suffice for an external description of reality, but NOT to explain the persistence and order of all wholes, and the meaning of science, as the whole supœrganism (ab. œ, changing slightly as usual in GST, the wording of super-organism) MUST have a point or centre of order that ensures its survival. This is the function of the mind that transits between ‘∆±1 scales’, as a pure temporal singularity, in contact with the inner ∆-i world of the body-limbs, but also with the ∆+i outer world in which it performs the actions of the survival program of exchange of energy and information that all systems ‘in existence’ follow.

Further on, in as much as science is a mental endeavour of perception of the Universe with the mirror-languages of time and space of the mind (logic and geometry), without understanding the mind-mirror and its interaction with reality there is no way we can make sense of a philosophy of science.


5d ∏ime§paœ ¬Æ points maximise their exi:s≈tienœ reproducing supœrganisms tripping ∆º world cycles…  is the first ‘funny’ sentence of the blog, which encodes of many similar ones, the meaning of it all. Reality is made of motions with form, past spatial entropy x future, temporal form, Spe x Tƒi, of cyclical times, πimes and fractal, organic spaces, spaœ ‘dust’, island-universes, which are dust from a higher perspective, ‘∆ust’, made of scalar space-time ‘arrows’/motions with form.

Yet all dust ‘exist’ and by the mere fact of existing it will have a singularity,a temporal mind, tº∆º, which will come in contact with a field of entropy, S, and extract a wave , s ≈ tº of energy and information, ex i.

To exist is to be a singularity mind with a perception, a mirror and a desire to order according to the mirror the Universe around the mind monad. And to that aim it will maximise its body-wave, e xi, exchanging entropy and form, from an Spatial field, in which it host, by approaching in parallel and absorbing in perpendicular, its motion with form. To maximise existence we can use a simple equation:

Max. exi|s=t, that is all systems try to maximise its present momentum by finding a balance between its body and information e=i.

1.1 Max. e=i

will in that sense be the simplest expression of the ‘existential function’; as it is a given that e and i will enter in relationship and communion of compemetnarity and maximise their reproduction and excommunication when both have the same value:

1.2  e+i=K-> Max.  e x i (e=i)

So there are three arrows of time. 2 which we can consider pure changes towards two poles of the being: pure form, which we relate closely to the still linguistic mappings of minds. Tƒi. And its opposite. Pure distance-space, simultaneous non-local, non-perceivable, Spe. Those two poles akin to the yin and yang pure limits of taoism; would represent in physics, pure, invisible gravitational space-vacuum and informative ultra-dense black holes. In biology the seminal seed of information that starts the life-death cycle and its explosion and dissolution in death. In topology, the singularity and membrane of a ‘ball’.

IT IS THE COMBINATION OF BOTH though in bidimensional present ‘momenta’, mixing both entropy and form, e x ƒ, what truly moves and changes the world, as pure seeds of information and invisible actions at distance are not perceivable.

So we talk loosely of PRESENT as the product of e x i :  s=t, that is as the mix of both limiting singularities and membranes (in a topological view) or mix past and future in a present (in a temporal view) , or ∆±1 scales of loose herds of entropic parts and tight knots of mind-perception, in a coordinated ∆º body-wave.

This ST, present, e x i ∆º body wave thus has both energy (form with dominant motion) & in-form-ation, form-in-action (form with minimal motion).

And so we consider Spatial Past-entropy x Time Future-information: Spe x Tƒi = ST=exi:   present momentum, mixture of ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’. This is the conventional verbal use of the terms ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’ that we preserve here.

And we call by convention, the relative ‘past’ of the Universe, the non-informative, pure vacuum and ‘future’ the, maximal informative state, even if both come back and forth in world cycles.

However as energy has been so much studied in mathematical terms, we have also to explore the somewhat slightly different more restrictive term of mathematical energy, as the integral of present momenta, which therefore will measure all the present momenta from birth to extinction of the being.

Thus humans measure those world cycles and its symmetric Organic simultaneous systems, with Energy used as the main parameter of physics to calculate physical world cycles which if computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. As all world cycles between birth and extinction are indeed conservative zero sums.

The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldcyle, etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.

As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.

Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The three arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) becomes  masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Now, let us introduce the terminology of , ‘stience’, and its GST≈∆ΦΓ ƒormalism considering the use of greek or double letters to slightly change the meaning in latin and make possible to introduce complexity with self-similar yet not equal concepts as those of normal ‘science’.

Cyclical time for example makes use of the similar letter π, ∏, which symbolises the cycle,and also the multiplicative form, which symbolises the network structure of informative bits: ∏imps.

§paœ on the other hand is fractal, co-exiting in several social, œrganic scales, forming the super organisms, ab.œ, of space-time, whih is all what exists, made of a relative ∞ number of infinitesimal ∆-1 particles of a lower plane, dust of space-time that evolves into island-universes, worlds, supœrganisms, made of three physiological arrows formalised with the laws of non-aristotelian, non-euclidean time: ¬Ærrows.

Hence the title of the post, a Universe made of: 5D ∏ime§paœ ∆ûst oƒ 3 ¬Ærrows

We shall use three terms and slightly different versions of the generator equation according to which of the three symmetries of the Universe we study:

Γ: For the wholeness of a world cycle generator equation that describes the three elements of beings in increasing detail:

∆-1: å for the actions of space-time, Ωº for its time Ωges, and W∑e+1, for its whole energy, its world cycles.

So those are the symbols for the generator equation of time arrows, its actions, ages and world cycles most used, which we combine often into other games of ‘words’ and phonemes, reconstructing self-similar words in different languages, as in the word Gœd=∆ºΓ

Φ & œ are the symbols for the | xO=Φ organic topologies parallel to those ages.

∆º±1 ±i, the scales of the being, which will normally be three. And so we can do ceteris parbius analysis stretching one of the parts of, ‘ΓΦ∆, GŒD’ in greek and latin letters. We are aware of the meaning of the word God, taken in GST as the mind of the Universe, more specifically the ‘game of existence’, or ‘function of existence’ that makes reality be a constant creation and destruction of world cycles of super organisms.

The use of different symbols stresses the fact that the Universe is a fractal that gather both in space and time smaller elements into wholes in three ranges. For example, time arrows combine first in ‘actions’ (å) of energy and time, the minimal unit of physical systems, expanded to all systems. They gather in ‘ages’,  (Ω) in which a type of arrow dominate. And those ages become finally world cycles (∑, w), which is the ternary wholeness beyond which a new game starts. In space we also find three topologies that become a ‘whole super organism’ (ab. Œ); and finally in scales, while we can observe multiple planes along the decametric logarithm scale, we shall find most systems do operate in three scales above and below the ∆º organic scale of the individual, where a ‘mind-informative center’ projects through actions of exchange of energy and information order over its territorial ternary system.

The absolute relativity of those atomic/cellular parts that become whole organic systems, diminutive actions that become whole world cycles of existence, is main explicit in our ‘third line analysis’ of the isomorphic nature and growth in time and space of those super organisms: the being will start as a mind pov, generating with actions of space-time a series of exchanges of energy and information with the world, starting a process of growth and organisation through three ages, and different variations of species, till becoming a whole ‘being’ an island-Universe in itself, extending through 10 scales of social growth and planes of reality. So all beings are from that perspective of full growth a God-mind, an island-Universe, but from a larger scale of existence, a mere particle-point or mind observing the infinite.

The absolute relative Universe of finite time, extension and scales for each º∆º mind ordering it.

So we can call God, the mind of the Generator, infinite, scalar Universe  of decametric planes, and all its decametric parts, with an ∆º mind the 10th dimension ruling them. And thus alas! despite so much critical thought on Absolute space-time and Newton’s religious musings, we do accept Space as the body of God, what we call Plenum, but also Plato understood:

‘REALITY is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’ Timeus, Plato.

It is important to understand the spirituality of an informative, organic universe, where the particle is not a substance as all is motion (albeit seen in simultaneity as a space form), and all is intelligent, meaning it has a cause, consequence, form and function.

But ALL IS RELATIVE, as there is no  preferred motion (relativity proper), form (all being variations of the three topological only species of reality), age and evolution (as all evolutions are part of a larger world cycle which will end into death and extinction) and scale. It is precisely this final relativity of scale, which makes indispensable to understand the game in subjective terms, as any ‘point of view’ which controls a system and organises it will have a subjective limited range of perception both in time (its life duration) space (its territory of inner order, membrane of communication and outer world) and scales (beyond which uncertainty, darkness and indistinguishability will make the borders of its perception, the limits of being)

Only then considering that the quantities that matter are constant ratios maintained across scales, that reality is designed for the observer, and limited by it, we can figure out truly the Universe as an absolute relative fractal where mind-points act as mirrors of order, creating around them territorial organisms with a limit of existence in time, of duration, of extension and of co-existing scales.

All this said we can now deal with mathematics as an excellent mirror image of that primary reality. And expand our foundations of logic and mathematics to introduce the simplest equations of GST and elements of any mind describing its relative ternary world: island-universe.

The fractal Generator.

We shall start by analysing the basic ‘formalism’ of Duality, the ‘fractal generator equation’ of the ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time beings that describes all the systems of entropy and information of the Universe, joined by its body-fields of energy:

Γ.  Fractal Generator Feed-back equation of Space-time beings:

∆-1: $pe (Planar, Lineal, Past entropy limbs/fields/territories)<∆º-ST: Hyperbolic, Present re=productive Working-citizens-body-waves of Energy>Tiƒ:Informative Future cyclical heads-particles-informative classes: ∆+1

This canonical equation of space-time beings incorporates all the previous partial equations of the temporal ages, physiological functions and topological forms of all the ternary physical, biological and social systems of the Universe.

We have added sociological systems and its ternary ‘class structure’, where the lineal, flat territories of Gaia provide our motion and food, (social Spe), the citizens of a nation work and reproduce its good, as its ST-body and the elite neuronal classes that control its languages of information, financial money or bankers and informative laws or politicians, normally living in a small capital territory.

And we have added a final element, its structure in social networks made of parts, ∆-1 that become wholes, ∆+1, or ‘5th dimension’ of the scalar, organic Universe (ab. ∆), to fully become a complete description of all the systems of reality.

Thus once we define the metric equation of 5D and incorporate its ∆±1 organic scales to Γ, the Generator, we will thus have a template logic equation to describe all systems of nature and its processes of existence.

I have been studying the Universe with 3 time arrows and a scalar dimension of space, for so long and found so many amazing solutions and explanations to reality that I do not want all this to remain in my ‘Leonardian notebooks’ – so to speak. Thus I will keep pouring all this research on the scalar structure of a web I will do so in this ‘unificationtheory.com’ site for future researchers to be able to unravel the deepest structure of reality and wonder over Trinity, 5D and the scalar immortal Universe far more beautiful and richer than the models physicists sponsor with a single arrow of time – expansive entropy, which is only 1/3rd of 1 of its ∞ scales.


The blog is a blueprint for an ‘¬Æncyclopaedia – the encyclopaedia of the Universe of Supœrganisms, as such it has a ¬Æ structure.

We first define in the main line, what the Universe is all about: a fractal reproductive  supœrganism of space-times (1st line) in which all species of all scales of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time follow the same laws, grouping in 10 isomorphisms that describe the world cycle of existence of all its supœrganisms, and the topobiological properties of those ∆ûst of space times, island universes, which think to be ∞ but are just dust and dust become.

Next in the 2nd  line we get ‘pros’ of stiences and describe all scales in stientific languages of the Human Mind (ab.Humind, Hm).

Thus departing from the Hm p.o.v. of knowledge and its languages of time (1st stience, time logic, and space, 2nd stience, mathematics, ) we describe  to describe with growing detail, the reduced Scales of astrophysical stiences (Max. |i|), then biological systems and finally our super organisms and worlds, with maximal detail of knowledge, but not of truth (as we see societies in a very distorted anthropomorphic form).

THEN the 3rd line describe   in a more objective manner, departing from the smallest plane of dark energy and neutrino, invisible gravitational fields, through the light-electrconic field, the atomic field of the z-2 scale upwards till arriving to the cosmological scale and beyond the ∞ games of decametric scales we call ‘God’, the Mind of the Universe. We do so the 10 sets of isomorphic laws, generated by all mind-mirrors of the Universe trying to maximise its function of existence, followed by all those scales of nested worlds and its stiences.


Though we deal in depth with astrophysics on the second line and even in more detail in the fourth line for specific theories such as Relativity or quantum physics and thermodynamics, and so we do with religion in the analysis of the historic supœrganism and its seven cultures, we need to make a first approach now from the p.o.v. of GST.

All this said we have, by the principle of correspondence to put in relationship with the other two grand theories of reality astrophysics and religions, the upgraded paradigm, correcting its main errors, which are in the case of religion is their hyperbolic expansion of its meaning – to convey the laws of eusocial love to mankind that puts parts into wholes, NOT to explain the meaning of all realities, and in the case of astrophysics, its deformation and deviation from the experimental method, with subtle censorships of  the arrow of information, as  ‘lineal physicists’ have as its worldly profession to make entropic weapons, and this practice has deformed their theories of reality to the point of thinking the Universe is dying and only entropy matters to reality – a cultura, professional distortion of theory by the praxis of reality NOT a fact.

While both have as common error to think that the Universal ultimate substance is NOT space and time, but the languages of mathematics and words we use to describe them.

Creationist ‘idealism’ in Physics and Religion vs. scientific organicism.

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity (arrogance) of man’ Einstein

‘God is the seer of time, with a logic more complex than man’s’ Saint Augustine

‘The body of God is Space, its plenum’ Newton

We just have introduced the mind-singularity of systems, which order reality for a simple reason:

All minds think to be the center of the Universe and so reject by ‘will’, NOT by intelligence the possibility that all other beings of the Universe have singularities. Humans REGARDLESS OF WHAT ‘truth’ sponsor, religion, science or opinion WILL scandalously deny and most leave the blog as soon as I affirm they exist in a sentient Universe, by logic truth (as we humans are made of space-time our properties are common to any other fractal part of the whole) and by experimental evidence, which we show in the next graph.

As humans are what they are, with the limits of the ‘paradox’ of the mind, which is the ‘self-centred’, subjective view that puts ‘our system’ in the center of the Universe, we need finally to clarify a priori two elements – the paradox of the mind, which is NEITHER unique, nor more intelligent ass the languages it uses to reflect reality and order it and its properties are common to all beings:

Mind singularities exist in ALL systems, call it black hole for the galaxy; crystal for the planet; DNA for the cell, nervous system for man.

And all of them follow the same equation:
O-mind (linguistic still mapping) x ∞ universe (moving time-space cycles) = Infinitesimal world.

So all minds think the Universe is self-centred in your zero mind, so you feel unique. But you are just an automaton mirror, like the crystal of the planet, or the black hole of the galaxy (whose 5D equations reflect the galaxy in 4D – Maldacena; as your brain homunculus reflects your organism that it orders). So all singularities reflect its selfish p.o.v. in the territory they order around and nothing else matters. So you think your nose is bigger than the andromeda galaxy, you hardly see. Perception does matter then for faulty mind’s theories. 

The ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, but there are infinite ego-species, each one with a language mapping reality, visual, verbal, olfactory, gravitational-black hole minds, each one with a still mind-mapping busy-busy ordering around. Only western man since the age of metal as he started to ‘kill life’ with weapons of entropy, chose to decide the animist world was dead and entropy the only arrow of reality. A Korean shaman understood better the yin x yang = energy game of creation. A fractal Universe is just a reproductive system of information. We are all monads-mind mirrors busy busy, ordering our territory as everything else.

So at the risk of offending so early the ‘human believer’ that will not continue reading, missing the upgrade of its scientific or ethic mind, we roughly divide present dominant theories about everything into 1/2th of people who believe mathematical physics has found the meaning of it all in the creationist big-bang, and 1/2th who believe verbal religion knows how God created the Universe, we are trying to ‘reason’, why your dogmatic beliefs, call it ‘science’ supposedly to be ‘reasoning’ or ‘religion’ is today more or less the same: human anthropocentrism; and the only serious scientific explanation of reality is the humble realisation, humans are not the only intelligent species, neither they can perceive the whole Universe in space extension and time duration.

In the graph, unlike the modern creationist, linguistic methods of astrophysics and religion, which believe ‘reality is linguistic’, made of two languages shared by God and man, either mathematics or words (a hyperbolic arrogant, anthropomorphic ascientific belief), GST considers as Leibniz did, that the origin of reality is a necessary substance, space-time, siding with Einstein on the philosophical dispute of physics, and considering religion a historic phenomena that expresses the laws of eusocial evolution, of biological origin in the human language of thought, words. The difference is subtle but important. In relational space-time, we consider that the mathematical, spatial and verbal, logic language are derived of the ternary properties of space and time, (so both mathematical equations and dimensions and verbal syntax are ternary mirrors of those properties, which reduce information and simplify the whole ‘to fit’ it in the human or other Universal minds). The immortal Universe. Upgrading astrophysics.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.


And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals“.  Ulam6-blind-men-hans

In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’  (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 6 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic, moving youth> reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 6 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC ‘young’ locomotions and its worldlines (which we will show to be partial cases of the reproduction of information carried by a wave), unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 6 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero.

The question of fractal self-similar scales.

An even deeper view of the big-bang is the analysis, given the fact that the Universe is a fractal of infinite scales, of which one is the scale in which our observations of a background radiation, possible remnant of a cosmic explosion take place – a question by no means settled, but considered so given the ‘hidden behaviour of humans of ANY discipline, science, art or religion, where the Einstein paradox – its infinite arrogance, soon explained in scientific terms with the definition of the equation of the mind – also plays its role, with the scientist (in an even more difficult case as scientists claim always to be reasonable, experimentally sound and yet KEEP committing the same ‘cosmic censorship’ of data and faulty reason, whenever it collides with their ‘job’).

In the graph we show the 2 essential problems of modern astrophysics – first its lack of a complex understanding of the scales of the Universe, all of which show similar ‘big-bangs’ of entropic matter, from left to right, the BG radiation, the galaxy, a nova big-bang of a star an a Hydrogen atom born of the beta decay big bang of a neutron. It is this awesome topological isomorphism of the three arrows of timespace what truly gives unity to all the beings of all the scales of the Universe.

A second more puzzling problem of the modern digital age, in which causality and epistemology is loosing ground, is the increasing denial of experimental evidence, substituted by mathematical, computer models, which seem real, whenever experimental facts defy dogmas of past-models, with a short of censorship, all too evident in the case of the cosmic big-bang, which has been falsified, but still is dogma, given the prestige it concedes to astrophysicists.

Indeed, the cosmic big-bang dogma maintains the pretension of physicists of being the ‘high popes’ of science (instead of philosophy of science or religion) and so with the concept of an entropy only universe, which justifies the military culture that originated it, is unassailable to reason.

Yet, the background radiation that supposedly proves the Universal big-bang IS a local measure. So it only applies only to the galaxy, likely originated in a quasar big-bang in the last cycle of life and death of its central barred black hole. The issue in fact resolved a few years ago when we found the final proof of the local nature of the BG radiation: in the centre, we see a recent picture of our galaxy with two electromagnetic bubbles above an below the saggitarius black hole, which are exactly the same observed in the BG radiation that astrophysicists thought to be originated 13 billion years light away, at the birth of the cosmos (: So they were using them trying to measure if its light after 13 billion years travelling from the cosmic big-bang suffered delays depending on frequency. Well it turnED out they are just above and below Saggitarius 🙂

IT IS THEN obvious that the Universe is an immortal fractal of galaxies imploding vacuum space into gravitational informative vortices of mass, and exploding mass into dark entropy, likely emitted at superluminal speeds through the axis of its central black holes and during its final entropic death as quasars

But and this is what matters to us to understand ourselves and the future, man does NOT exist in the dark entropic or gaseous states of matter, but in the liquid and solid states of the galaxy and the surface of the earth, which are dedicated to reproduce NOT to extinguish information.

So we affirm that the local Universe is a fractal of three arrows of time, simple, relative past lineal, expansive, disordered entropic motions, its inverse, arrow of complex, cyclical, informative clock-like cycles, and its dominant, present, repetitive energetic combinations.

And its purpose is not death but life, the constant, fractal reproduction of systems, which communicate information with different languages with the purpose of building more complex social organisms.

And this is crystal clear in the universe at large, which appears as a clear network of organic galaxies evolved since a hypothesized fast big-bang death of a previous network universe in a quantum of time during eons of life evolution into complex social super organisms, from forces into virtual particles, atoms, molecules , states of matter, cells, organisms, planetary super organisms, and networks of stars ruled by the gravitational information of its DNA-like informative black holes that catalyze its evolution and reproduction.

So we can model all those scales of matter that matter to us, as a series of nested Russian dolls, each a super organism made of smaller super organisms, whose purpose is always to reproduce its information faster than any rival species, to survive in the struggle for existence, as Darwin explained us.

It is then when the second fundamental law of balance besides the balance of the three arrows of time-space comes into play, since, as we have already explained, smaller parts run paradoxically faster time clocks than larger beings which have more entropy, so both can work together in symbiosis to create the scales of size in space and different speed of time clocks of the Universe.

And yet, not even the astounding experimental evidence of multiple scales in nature, validated further by relativity with its infinite time clocks has changed the paradigm of a mechanical clock and a human anthropomorphic scale of single space-time; as none of the multiple proofs against the entropic big-bang coming from the last decades, treated in our articles on astrophysics, which should have definitely settled the issue has changed, the CULTURAL DOGMAS of astrophysics, hauling from the mechanist, pious founding fathers of this science with their religious, Newtonian beliefs in absolute time-space and the worldly military profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons.

‘Creationist astrophysicists’ of the big-bang continuum should if they respect epistemology and science concede defeat and renew Hoyle’s theory of local quasar big-bangs and allowed the fractal theory of the organic Universe to become standard, simply got swept under the rag, and nobody talks anymore of it. In that sense it is important to notice two facts:

  • That science is a human endeavour and often uses all the tricks of the book, hyperbole, censorship, dogma, etc. to impose half truths. So we must analyse scientific theories with the same ‘criticism’ that religious or philosophical ones. 
  • While astrophysics is still vital to fully grasp the scalar nature of the Universe – and the question more interesting about those self-similar scales is if each atom is a fractal scale similar to a galaxy in an infinite Universe, or both are the true limits of reality; it will NOT reveal the ultimate questions, because they are not concerned with spatial pictures but temporal causality.

This is a very important, completely overlooked fact of philosophy of science and the whys of reality: the inquire of knowledge does not end, we shall repeat ad nauseam in the mere collection of data and modelling of pictures, because the Universe is not chaotic. 


The obsession with machines of measure has reduced a lot the inquire of many scientists, and the overwhelming detail of the trees, makes most to think it is IMPOSSIBLE to find first principles larger than those details, common laws and forms underneath all the species of reality as we shall do here. The visual dominance of our civilisation is making many young people loose even the sense of ‘causality’ – blinding them to even the questioning of all what is not evident. SO IT IS in a way going against trend to pretend to build a rational, causal, time-oriented scalar model of reality because some scales, above us, cannot be pictured as wholes; many forces and networks that connect parts, are dynamic, invisible; time flows of causality cannot be pictured. This, I believe, is a key handicap for a GST to be taken seriously but for those who are ‘intelligent enough’ to go beyond the shallow goals of present science and the visual generation, for those who still make the why-question, the answers are precisely on that scalar structure we cannot picture simultaneously.

Religions have a purpose but they neither give us the ultimate answers.

In the other extreme is on the other hand religions, which do not offer experimental evidence at first, on their creationist theories of reality. But surprisingly again, in scalar space-time they do have a role, they are not mere superstition, as the concept of Jung’s subconscious collective, which theory of super organisms renew. A religion, or ethic network of legal simultaneous mandates do exist because its purpose is to peg together and make harmonious the actions of people under the human interpretation of the forces of communication that put together parts into wholes – in this case the arrow of social love.

So religions merely translate for each time and people, with fancy myths to wrap up the whole, the need for a social force that organises humans into super organisms. And as such it offers some of those answers on the purpose of the Universe -to love each other and evolve together into larger wholes. But as it does so in old, primitive jargons, it brings a confusion that now GST clarifies (indeed a unification theory of it all cannot consider ANYTHING THAT EXISTS as not necessary and with a role for another part of reality or else, the efficient universe would eliminate it). 

So the function of religion IS historic – to express the laws of eusocial love that evolve parts into wholes by sharing the energy and information of human beings, synchronising as DNA does, with its memetic messages of love to the human species, the different citizen-cells of the world.

In the next graph we show then the meaning of religions, the subconscious collective of human super organisms of history and its natural evolution in scales of growing size, which ideally would enclose all mankind, loose its ‘mystical hang-ups’ and become studied in history just a precursors of the laws of love of the social 5th dimension, both in its study of the anthropomorphic super organisms of mankind (western religions of social love) an the universal super organisms and its taoist laws of timespace arrows (eastern religions):

In the graph, the 6 main human cultures born of the natural evolution of the concept of social love and its super organisms of mankind and the Universe (western vs. eastern gods). From the graph we can get an obvious conclusion: tribal religions and tribal ‘nationalisms’, two expressions of the same concept which believe their ‘god/nation’ is the ‘only/best’ one are just a primitive version of the larger organic view of modern systemic sciences. And today a mere excuse to foster the evolution of weapons that will kill us.

For that reason the evolution of tribal religions ended in oikoumene love religions and finally socialist doctrines. While the evolution of animist and taoist cults became the final horizon of systems sciences with their organic models of a living Universe, this writer develop when working in science at the turn of the century. In brief, we can again apply the Correspondence principle of science to account for religions as evolutionary stages of an Organic Theory of Everything applied to human cultures or the Universe as super organisms.

So while religions express some of the whys of social evolution in old jargons, ideally they would be taught as stages in the search for the understanding of the organic nature of everything in scientific terms, which is how we shall describe them in this blog.

A final question though we shall leave pending. If we are as humans ‘cells of religious or national super organisms’, and in the case of religions, we co-share a revelation meme-book, similar to the DNA, and there are ‘unseen’ scale above us that organise parts but parts cannot ‘see’ in space, there exists an upper scale in which ‘a consciousness of a god’ as the consciousness of an ambulatory trillion cells called a human being exists?

It is obvious that if we exist but cells do not see us as smaller parts do not perceive wholes but only the networks that attach them; there might exist a collective consciousness of all muslims called Allah, of all Jewish called Yhwh, and so on. A fact which would explain why people-cells of those cults die for the subconscious collective, while others who do not believe in a god and hence are self-centred in their biological wholes find weird such behaviour. “Sangris martire semen christianorum’, said a roman philosophers. But even so, it will be a local ∆+1 scale NOT the creator of the Universe.  So again, religions fit within the larger theory of the living fractal universe.

 Only an organic philosophy of everything works.

So, we conclude that both in terms of the evolution of religion and natural sciences, GST, the organic philosophy of the Universe an its T.Œ, Theory of Everything based in the ultimate substances of reality, space and time, is the widest, most economic and comprehensive theory of reality – which in epistemology of truth are the proofs of veracity of a system (Ockham’s razor).

So I always saw my work as the ‘knot of thought’ of a millenarian search of mankind for responses to its ultimate questions – the path to a proper research for the ultimate whys, which includes all other previous inquires by the correspondence principle, including religions an big-bang theories (the two dominant dogmas of truth on the meaning of it all today believed by mankind).

What I did not know when i found those answers is the repetitive memorial nature of ‘minds-mirrors’, which make most human slaves of beliefs – this i would learn as an activist against the Nuclear Industry and through my attempts to explain the ascientific nature of the big-bang. 

Needless to say those texts will be irreverent with all models of reality that show no enough evidence, and back themselves with prestige, authority, dogma and so we shall move from correspondence with right theories to critical view of so many ones that do not pass the cut.

Philosophy of stience: the science of all sciences; its methods.

Now the aim of the blog is not only to upgrade the formal languages of man, and how they mirror and explain the different ‘stiences’ (space-time sciences, each one studying a scale of reality), and species in a more reasoned form, but ultimately span from an entire life NOT renouncing to find rational answers to the ultimate questions about reality: why we exist, what are the ultimate principles that unify the Universe, what is the purpose of man, what is the mind, how we perceive, and other questions which were traditionally the field of philosophy.

In that regard, today there is a clear split between philosophy and linguistic, epistemological thought vs. experimental, data-gathering science, which I find improper of the unity of it all.

That unity might be understood in terms of synthetic wholes and analytical parts reflected in the previous scalar graph of the sciences of the Universe, with its multiple co-existing perspectives. So what we call philosophy of ‘stience’ (as sciences are space-time sciences), is merely the largest, more synthetic view of the Universe as a whole – hence the search for the ultimate whys, which in classic eastern religions would be call the understanding of the Tao, the whole, in modern jargon, the ultimate principles of science, which are mostly ‘linguistic’, broad, with applications to all disciplines, as they derive from the ‘ultimate substances, space and time and its mathematical and logic properties, common to all beings, ultimately made of ‘dust of space-time’.

This is then the subject of philosophy of science, NOT of Abrahamic religions (the study of the super organisms of mankind and its subconscious collective, a sub-discipline of history), NOT of physics (the study of the ∆>|i| scales, most removed in size from the human biological scale), even if the ‘high popes’ of those ‘stiences’ think it is their task to deform and explain all other ‘stiences’ with the specific qualities of their disciplines, to ‘make them look’ as a product of physical or mystical properties. 

This hyperbolic ego-trip of ‘informative power’, which first distorted science with biblical thoughts, from scholastic (distortion of the awesome findings of Aristotle and the Greeks on the ‘first principles of nature’), to calendar counting (fitting geology on 5000 years), to biology (denial of evolution), today still plaguing social sciences, notably economics, with its single-view of capitalism as a fetish-go(l)d religion of accumulation of money (derived of the biblical beliefs of its founding fathers, from Mr. Smith ‘the invisible hand of god is gold’, to the modern American monetarist school) gave way as physicists made entropic weapons of mass-destruction and ‘heat machines’, the tool of power of westerners, to the enthronement of a single arrow of entropy and death as the meaning of the Universe, and the absurd idea that the ‘scales’ of microscopic particles mattered more than any other scale, and his laws were more fundamental, as parts mattered more than wholes.

On the other extreme, there is though also the valid, and important task of study in great detail the particular combinations of temporal arrows and scalar geometries, which give birth to the beings of each scale and stience. And this is the task in which present stiences excel thanks to the development of ‘metalife’, species made of more complex atoms of metal, which gather with more precision information about space and time than our spatial eyes and temporal, verbal logic words. The philosopher of science does not though need to do such detailed observation but trust the experimental scientists, accept its findings as ‘tests’ of his synthetic models and proofs of the veracity of them by fitting the data in the synthetic models. 

So time permitted we will add the data of some very detailed analysis of each scale and its species, which is the epistemological goal of present science, in the synthetic 10-set of isomorphic properties derived of those ultimate principles (third and fourth lines).

This final task of putting the details into the thoughts of god, the experimental data into the synthetic model IS WHAT scientists today have renounced to do, as if it was NOT the icing in the cake of science, which It is.

All this said, as we have explained now the main disciplines and elements of reality we have to tackle, the icing in the cake, which unfortunately both science as it cannot be taken pictures of, and religions with its anthropomorphic outlook deny – the sentient, kaleidoscopical, mental nature of the Universe.

So we shall now consider the final element of reality – the mind-mirrors that observe the whole, which are NOT only humans, and while cannot be proved by quantitative methods and pictures, as they are dynamic singularities difficult to observe externally, can be proved externally by its consequences of order, and internally by self-reflecting on the mind of man, which if made of space-time must therefore share properties with, and be replicated by other space-time minds. Indeed, the proof of a sentient Universe in a world in which we are all space-time beings, is by homology. Reality must have the same structure and properties humans have. Since in the organic paradigm, the simplex machine, today evolving into organic robots, is no longer the model of reality, but the most perfect supœrganism (ab. œ)…


œ-Minds observing ∆ûst of space-time.

All the properties described till now, define a scalar≈organic, topological≈mathematical, sentient≈perceptive Universe, as each system will have finally a ‘point of reference’ singularity or focus, which perceives and processes information with the simple goal of making the whole survive through its actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with his world, and we shall call ‘Monad-Mind-Mirror’ – as a mind is nothing but a linguistic ‘still mapping’ of reality that absorbs information carried by bits and bites cyclical of space-time (light forces, electrons, atoms), ‘reducing’ its motions and dimensions to ‘have an image’ of reality, from the perspective of the being, which will be use by the system to successfully absorb and emit energy and information ordering its world around (body-territory), becoming exactly what Aristotle said of each mind-mirror-monad: ‘an unmoved God, ultimate cause of the order and motion of the body that surrounds it’ (affirming latter ‘we are all Gods’) when he finally ‘got it’:

In the graph, the icing in the cake: mental singularities which control the three parts of the system, and by natural selection have become ‘darwinian’, following a program that maximises their existence, through a series of simple actions of ‘motion, perception, feeding on energy and reproduction’, which mechanically, vegetatively or consciously ensures the perception of the being.

Humans as a cyclical scalar space-time being.

Below we show the human being resumed as just another being made of dust of fractal vital ‘§pace’ and cyclical, ‘finite’ clocks of time – a super organism travelling through the scales of the fifth dimension tracing world cycles of existence between its birth as a seminal seed and its death in an explosion of entropy, as any other super organism (ab. œ) of the Universe. We write for good measure the ‘formal equations’ of any world cycle of time and its symmetric view of the system as a super organism in space, as we are nothing but ∆ust of space-time travelling through three scales of the fifth dimension:In the graph, the last element, which will become ultimately the most important of all, to understand the universe is the concept of an ‘action’ of space-time, by which a being absorbs and emit entropy-motions, energy for reproduction and perceptive information.

The program of existence.

Since all what all the systems of the Universe do is to try to survive by maintaining its limbs/fields of entropy, bodies-waves of energy and heads-particles of information, with ‘plenty’ of the stuff they are made. So all what all systems do and its super organisms code are the so called five drives of life, motion ( a-ccelerations), energy-feeding (e), informing (perceiving and communicating: ï), reproducing similar offspring (œ) and finally evolving socially with similar beings into stronger wholes or ‘Universals’ of a larger social ∆+1 scales (u).

So we talk of a mnemonic a,e,i,o,u system of ‘actions of space-time’, which every system of Nature performs in discontinuous, modular sequential series between birth and extinction, as the PROGRAM OF SURVIVAL OF THE UNIVERSE and all it system, encoded for each species with different informative linguistic parameters (i.e. an electron codes with four quantum numbers those actions, so the first number encodes its motion and energy feeding, the second number its informative processing, the third spin number its seminal reproduction, the fourth magnetic number its social evolution; a cell codes the five actions with its four letters, the human being, with its verbal thoughts, a company-mother of machines with its equations of re=productivity and so on).

We shall then show that we can build the architectonical Universe not only in space as a sum of ‘∆-1: fractal points’ that become physiological networks that become wholes of an external world in three scales of complexity, but also in time, as a ternary scaling process of individual actions, which become arrows of time, which become world cycles of existence…

As the sum of those actions, invariably increase the information of the system, dominated by its informative particle-heads, given the fact that its sequential order: +∆i: perceiving, -∆e: moving, +∆e: feeding, +∆i->œ: reproducing, +∆i:communicating to form organic synchronised wholes, invariably increases the ‘in-form-ation’ of the system (maximal number of +∆i events) and decreases its energy, ultimately explaining why all systems follow a worldcycle of increasing information, till all energy and entropy is exhausted, and as TIME NEVER STOPs, the system must reverse its arrows and suffer a sudden explosion of entropy and erasing of information, i<<e, in the moment of death, which the Universe limits to a single time quanta, in its enormous wisdom to maintain the total amount of entropy and form of reality in a zero-sum of ‘conserved present energy’, to make it immortal.  the minimalist ‘timing of death’, always happening in the minimal ‘quantum of time’ of any species.

The big-bang of a galaxy (and perhaps a local Universe)  takes 10 ˆ-43 seconds, a planck’s time quantum. Our personal death takes a second, the ‘beating time quanta’ of our ‘eyes glimpses, heart-beat, step-walking – each species having its ternary parts synchronised to its time quanta:And so we all die for the Universe to be eternal.

The 12 ∆ST Isomorphic elements of all Fractal ∏ime§pace beings:

The understanding of those elements together, the scales, ∆, of space (S) and time (t), of a system, focused as a whole by the existence of an infinitesimal singularity or mirror- mind (ab. •,º) of information (which we can only infer by comparison with the human mind and its survival actions), will define the fundamental particle of the Universe, a super organism of space-time, which we call ‘∆ºûst of space-time’, in as much as it is an island-universe in itself, (û), extending through ∆-scales of space-time, and organised by a relative ∆º-mind  and its linguistic mind mirrors able to control and order the Universe around them.

In that regard, the isomorphic method comes immediately from the two FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF GST: the four elements of all whole systems (mind, scales, space and time) and the ternary principle, which allows to study in detail any system along those four ‘elements’ by decomposing it into ternary elements (up, down and central scales, three ages, three topologies; and the mind focus on the other three elements, as a temporal self, which orders a ternary super organism, defined by a ‘generator equation’ through its scalar actions.

So first we consider the mind as the temporal vector of the being, moving across all other dimensions of existence:

º-mind:   0.1 5.   Ø-Minds   Generate… Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions… 

The perspective of the mind is selfish, trying to order and mirror its internal view, within the body, which in an Aristotelian sense is the energy moved by the ‘unmoved’ God-center of its whole. Yet as each mind-pov orders reality ‘LINGUISTICALLY’, the sum of all those povs which collaborate together.

So we define three isomorphisms of the Mind, symmetric to the three ‘other elements’ of any system:

  • 0. Its location in space (0-isomorphism), normally in the center or above of the system, at the points of maximal communication, a clear proof of its perceptive nature.
  • G. Its Universal Grammar, or language of processing information, escaping the subjective human anthropomorphic beliefs about non-sentient or sentient species – fact is  A LANGUAGE IS PERFECTLY ABLE TO MANAGE INFORMATION AND ORDER REALITY as the mathematical language of machines and nature, the olfactory language of animals or the genetic language of cells show. Thus we simply affirm languages are the mirrors of minds that order reality through:
  • Å. Actions, which are exchanges of entropy, energy an information with the environment.

In this manner a space-time being will emerge as a network of entropic, energetic and informative actions organising a ternary supœrganism. It is this collective intelligence of selfish povs, which as time passes coordinate, synchronise and simultaneously act as a whole, the ultimate intelligence of the Universe that gives birth to a spatial supœrganism:

S:  2. 3. 4.  integrated into…Bidimensional Space-Time fields of Ternary, Constant Networks… B;  K; Γ

We can then define any system as a part or whole system of ternary networks, in which fractal points will emerge to form a full functional system. In detail the process starts with exchanges of entropy and information between ‘two points-minds’ that give birth to a bidimensional field, seen as a flow of entropy or information dynamic terms, as a ‘wave of extended space’ in static terms.

As more points attach to the network, however this ‘field’ limited by the points which become its border, acquire their own inner dynamics, becoming the protagonist of the next phase of creation of reality; when the system evolves from a herd state, in which points have maximal motion, and the interaction between them is discontinuous, often along a single network line (mostly entropic actions of feeding together), into a superorganic, tighter configuration.

IT HAPPENS as reproduction increases the size of the herd and efficiency is required to feed the system.

And so again we define three isomorphisms, for the spatial organisation of the being, which can be resumed in its generator:

  • A BIDIMENSIONAL isomorphism that analyses the relationships between the limits of the domain, its past entropy and future information parameters
  • The generator proper that studies the three networks which create the system together
  • And the constants and ratios that define dynamically those systems, through its entropic speed (S/t), informative density (t/s), existential momentum (S x t) and scalar structure (∆§).

So a new collective singularity, able to manage hierarchically faster flows of information that diminish friction between the individual points of the herd arises and a larger whole is formed…

T:  6. 7. 8  that will move 3±∆ ages as a Species… Ω : Ψ; ∑  The system then will be born, as an individual super organism or a new species in an efficient predatory lineal form,  in a young entropic age of growth, dominated by the entropic, digestive, feeding arrow/network, able to maximise the hunting capacity and starting a ‘reproductive radiation’ that increases its territory of order, during its mature age as a super organism, seen either as an individual (middle point of view) or a species (point of view of the ∆-1 cell). In that case we realise that species can also be described as variations of the same theme into 6 different phyla according to the dominance of the S, st, or Tiƒ system (S>st>t, S>t>st, St>t>st, St>s>t, t>st>s, t>s>st), to which we ad the fundamental duality of the Universe or variation of gender, between the ‘female-wave’ state of balance, S=t, and the ‘male field-particle’ state of dynamic imbalance (S>t<s). And so we can describe that growth before once more the reproduction saturates the system, exhausting its energy and plunging the being into its informative third age and entropic death, which restores the balance, from the perspective of its scalar dimension, as a process of social growth…

∆…  9. 10. 11   through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ  of God… Γº∆ 

So finally the three ultimate isomorphisms describe reality from the perspective of the fifth dimension as a constant growth of systems through social scales of decametric tetraktys 3 x 3 +0, physiological entropy moving limbs/fields, energetic bodwaves and informative particle/heads – networks of points, which grow with a minimum of three ternary elements, till creating a o-mind of maximal communication between them, which emerges as a whole for a larger social scalar growth till forming a ‘plane’ of 10¹° elements. The difference between social scales and planes being a larger discontinuity of form, from microscopic to macroscopic order… So we study all those social scales, till the limits of human perception, the atom and the galaxy, likely to be just new levels of an infinite ¹° 10 immortal infinite Universe – a block of time that has always existed, will always exist and will keep repeating the same forms.

Those constants of form, and its diversifications, compare to the reproductive, clone repetitions bring further philosophical questions, since if the number of variations of information is smaller than the number of reproductions in space, all forms will be repeated in a discontinuous manner, and we are all immortal as the Universe is, co-existing as clone identical populations, obeying a bose-statistics scheme, in which equal forms communicate regardless of space-distance as bosons by non-local entanglement, but such themes of complex GST are well beyond the scope of this post. So we shall  end our description of the 11+0 isomorphisms of reality at this stage. 

The blog content.

So we can and will slowly build this blog to show how all systems of the Universe are ‘made of dust of space-time’, and all its ‘isomorphic=equal’ properties can be derived from that ‘ultimate substance’, which as Leibniz put it, we can call ‘God’.

In this first (and second) lines, we shall study the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view, in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST:

  • The experimental, scientific method, providing proofs of the cyclical, fractal ðime-§pace structure of all Universal beings.
  • The correspondence principle, translating basic theories of classic science to ‘stience’.
  • Which we shall fusion together into the GST-proper ‘stientific method’, the isomorphic method that shows any law of known-known science can be put in correspondence with the isomorphic properties of space-time beings, translated and applied to physical, biological an social systems equally. The isomorphic method though will be used in the third and fourth line. So the first two lines are meant to be a ‘transitional stage’ between ‘classic science’ and ‘future stience’.

So we structure the posts of those two first lines with a simple scheme. At epistemological level (1) in the first line, we describe the topological (S), organic (∆), vital (T) and sentient (º) properties of beings, derived of its ∆ºST common nature.

In the second line (2) at experimental level we show the main ‘stiences’ of reality and its main species to obey those laws, which suffice to derive all properties of physical, biological, social and mental systems.

1) Epistemological Proofs, which ‘Correspond’ with classic theories and its experimental facts allowing for all the scales and entities of reality the description of its events and forms through:

  • Its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties derived of its ternary topological=spatial elements and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles.
  • Its biological properties, derived of the 5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure of all systems.
  • Its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of exi=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals.

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final ¬-Æncyclopedia of GST systems:

2.1) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the properties of:

2.2) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 and…

2.3) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

2.4) Mental, linguistic systems (mathematical, visual≈artistic, genetic, verbal, etc.), whose description under the ∆ºst properties of all beings will close the second line.

Needless to say the ‘hidden symmetries and correspondences’ of the parts of the Universe, as seen by human beings are many. For example, humans ‘like’ to apply only spatial=mathematical properties to physical systems, vital, temporal ages only to biological systems, social and mental qualities only to human beings, yet we shall show the ∆ºst quality of all beings to be the same, regardless on how huminds, which want to come on top as the self-centred only intelligent, social loving species describe them.

But of course we believe our mirror-minds are the ‘origin’ NOT just a reflected ‘crystal-like’ organ. So for example, we think our ‘mind’ creates mathematics (platonic idealism), which then is the ‘only’ language of reality (physical naive reductionism). Not so, there are infinite languages of information (Upanishad), and all of them are mirrors with ternary fractal structures that reflect the larger ∆ûst  or primary substance from where the imitative languages depart.

Let us see how with a brief analysis of one of those mind-mirrors, the mathematical language, as an experimental stience-mirror, as it is customary for ‘science’ to think in platonic terms, since Galileo that only maths and maths ‘imagined by humans’ (Hilbert’s axiomatic method: ‘i imagine lines, points and planes), are a ‘real language’ of description of the Universe. So we shall conclude this introduction showing that maths are a mirror of ∆ºûst properties. Above we show indeed that maths are self-centred mirrors in its frames of reference that reflect the Universe, because the Universe is born of the interaction of those mind-mirrors and the ordered territories they control.

The mathematical Universe IS perceptive and social.

A fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy, which cannot produce order. Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider infinite the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in  frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers  which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

The same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure of informative class in control of the law and money, working re=productive class, and third exploited world of Nature and ‘wrongly’, human people, who should all belong to the head-body of society, in social systems, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Indeed, even if we do not have inner experience of those minds, we DO have logic and experimental external proofs of the existence of those ‘Maxwellian’ demons of order, which are also observed by the fact that all beings do follow the same program of actions, biologists call the drives of existence: they create linguistic mirrors of reality in smaller scales, which reflect in a territory of order, where they absorb energy to reproduce an evolve socially with clone species to become a whole one.

We shall thus conclude that all systems that work as ‘wholes’ are ∆ºst of space-time, mind-mirrors of a larger Universe, reflected in linguistic mappings, mostly but not only mathematical, but also ∆ûst, ‘universes from the inner perspective of its organic, internal, scalar structure’. And that constant play of creation of mind-mirrors, reflecting its inner order in its outside territory, reproducing, shrinking and enlarging its information, creating the fractal, reproductive, organic strutter of the Universe, is what all is about. We might even ad considerations on the sensorial nature of space and time, as space like-events such as motion brings a ‘sensation of pleasure an erasing’, opposed to time-like events, with its patterns of ‘perception of information’, and ‘awareness’. The world as ‘will and representation’, then would become the two engines of those Universal whys, ‘the will of space-time sensations’ and the ‘mind-represetation of reality’.

All this makes each of us merely a piece of ∆ust of space-time, which thinks to be the center of the Universe, from its singularity mirror but it is just an infinitesimal point that holds a world in itself… as every other monad-point of reality, which certainly will consider itself also the center of its perceived mind-mirror. Hence in philosophical terms 5D fractal, cyclical space-time is a theory of absolute relativity, which brings a notch further the objective nature of science, which constantly take man away from the center of reality, as Copernicus (center of space-location), Darwin (center of time-informative evolution), and Einstein did before (relativity of motion). Now we are displaced once more from the center of scales of reality in a Universe which is complex, infinite and immortal, but humans see as simplex, finite and mortal because their mind-mirrors ARE still too simplex, finite and mortal to understand the whole.

Conclusion: The need for a forest view.

I am in that sense fully aware that rational thought has moved from an earlier Greek age of little detail by lack of mechanisms of perception of scalar space (telescopes, microscopes) and cyclical time (mechanical clocks), which however could find ‘formally’, focused in ‘languages’ and its syntactic mirrors of reality many fundamental laws of the Universe, with astounding intuitions about the essence of reality… into the present age of an astounding mechanical capacity to observe in space and measure in time, the forms and frequencies of systems and events… which however is clearly lagging in the understanding of the linguistic mirrors we put on reality and ultimately express the rational capacity of man to ‘know’.

Science in that sense means to ‘know’, and knowledge is ultimately linguistic knowledge. So today we suffer the opposite sickness to that of the greeks: we have still formal languages stuck in the Greek age of Euclidean geometry (as we have only corrected the fifth postulate of geometry, foundation of mathematics) and Aristotelian logic (with a single time arrow), which are simplified mirrors of the scalar spatial and cyclical temporal nature of the Universe, and so we try to fit an astounding amount of detailed, complex observations, into the simplex ‘formal box’ and the result is a confusing modelling, and most often a mere ‘account of data’, observations, pictures and measures without models at all.

And of course, as humans are huge egos, and they never recognise their incompetence, we can observe, specially among physicist, an ‘attitude’ of disdain towards the philosopher of science, reflected in the dictum of Feynman, which shuns off philosophy of science, since the why is the only thing a ‘lesser mind’ never asks.

Scientists in the time i used to attend congresses had in that sense mostly the attitude of the fable of Esopus and the fox who despised the vine it could not reach. They simply don’t care mostly for the final element of the scientific method, which must A) first gather experimental data, then B) find regular cycles and the repetition of cyclical events, to obtain finally C) rational models of synthetic reality to forecast future repetitive events.

Instead many scientists today, specially young experimentalists, on the age of ‘visual thought’, think all what there is to science is A) gathering data with sensorial machines B) put then in the language of mathematics with the help of computers to C) make a nice picture/graph of data. And alas! all has been revealed… No need for linguistic, synoptic mental mirrors to ‘intuitively’ feel the whys and causal reasons of that data.

This method focused on computer modelling has in turn created a ‘religion of digital thought’ as the only language of science, shunning off the organic, co-existing properties derived of the fractal structure of Nature’s systems, and of course, the human ego has a priori denied any ‘perceptive’ or ‘living’ properties to anything that is not like us.

So sciences are reaching a simplistic, quasi-religious outlook as today many scientists think though that A suffices and C must not be evolved, but old cranky models which are ‘dogmas’ must always be used. Since this is an easy method, simple, pedestrian, memorial, repetitive, well established.

It is sometimes funny to observe how even experimental facts are denied to force-feed data into old known-known models, without changing paradigm (i.e. observation of non-local faster than light speeds, denied to maintain the 4D model of light space-time, which should only apply within galaxies, in the human perceived scales; observation of social, organic evolution as the best strategy of survival of species, denied to maintain the ‘victorian’ dog-eat-dog vision of evolution of Mr. Darwin and the competition of individuals as the sacred dogma of capitalism, to put to obvious examples).

We shall of course accept the merit of that method, but go further, by upgrading the foundations of maths, to show they reflect also organic properties, when properly understood, and then work NOT on C)silly-nilly powerpoint graphs as ‘the truth’ of scientific modelling, but build sound linguistic template models derived from the ultimate substance of all beings, mathematical space, cyclical time, and organic space-time scales of the fifth dimension, to fit A)data expressed in B)io-logical & topological models based in the organic properties of the 5th dimension  and the symmetries between the three arrows of time and the three equivalent topologies of space.

And then we also make C) ‘digestible’ nice graphs, with some artistic ‘latino’ flavour just for fun 🙂 oh, yes, the model includes also human senses, called now art and literature as if they were void of truth, just because we are not machines, and shun off the pedantry of our experimental scientists and the P.R.ess and industry of big-science with his hyperbolic sense of self-importance, which confuse complicated jargons with truth when the Universe is in fact ‘simple but not malicious’ (Einstein), as ‘simplicity is genius’  (Leonardo).

So another difference of this blog of synthetic philosophy of science and the topic paper of the specialist written with a forbidding jargon, void of meaning but looking very ‘cool’, specially if you don’t understand a word of it, is our effort to return to the ‘meat’ and ‘content’ that matters. i.e. for example in mathematics we return to the real units of space, fractal points, and time, sequential numbers, back to the first principles, shunning off the pedantic, idealist German school (Hilbert’s axiomatic method, Cantor’s set theory), because as Godel and lovachevski’s proved mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences (Heaviside), in as much as it is the best linguistic mirror that extract the common properties of all systems made of fractal points, associated in numbers, which are growing scale of parts that conform the whole new planes of the fifth dimension.

Mathematics are NOT as the astounding arrogance of Hilbert and the German school told us born of the ‘imagination of the mathematician, which shared with God the only language of the Universe’. Once and again we shall see how the ‘ego-paradox’ of the human being cripple into dogma. Languages are kaleidoscopic mirrors, which distort and multiply the images we obtain of the universe; so all languages do have fictions, including mathematics, and we are interested in pruning the trees of inflationary languages to see the simplicity of the forest, because otherwise as Einstein put it, we will ‘know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’, meaning when it is syntactically correct but a fairy tale, with no correspondence with reality. A fact often forgotten by mathematical physicists who think if they can invent an equation the equation is truth per se, and alas! a particle will appear, call it an evaporating black hole, a SUSY fishy particle (: or a parallel Universe 🙂

Finally a word in defence of humanity, which is still the most profound intelligent system of this planet. Most scientists today think the ultimate answers will come from sensorial machines and A.I. just because they calculate faster. But it is the form and the vital experience of our actions and memories, not the speed of a logic system what gives it its intelligence. And so far humans before A.I. robots roam the planet acting and experiencing events are the best brains, with the highest synthetic quality. So do not expect a Unificationtheory of it all (the other name of this site) come from a computer or its human equivalent, a nerd; but from a human polymath with a long experience on the ‘book of life and nature’, from a fleshy brain of a scientist with maximal praxis in all the fields of the human experience ,and minimal mechanical help – there is enough data gathered by other scientists for the synthesis to be made only with ‘thought experiments’ as Mr. Einstein put it. Our interest is in the forest view, the thoughts of God, i-rational mind of the Universe, not its details, others would add in the future.

Since ultimately this blog is only the first unpolished ‘diamond’ of ‘stience’, a seed that humans or those future A.I. machines when conscious will keep evolving and adding to. And so as all first seeds it might look rough, unpolished, with some errors, and lack of details, you are welcome to add, correct and post, even once you have understood the ‘system’, evolve further, as ideally the fourth line was meant to be a collaborative effort of potential disciples of ‘stience’.

We are just doing what scientists are not doing lost in the groundwork of cataloging the trees: upgrade the ‘albatross’ view above the forest – the models according to the facts by evolving the languages and fundamental principles.

This is obvious and sorely needed. Consider for example the absurd concept of lineal time.  The reader should observe that the very concept of science as a model with predictive capacity is based in the fact that events repeat, and so time is cyclical, measure by the frequency of similar events. How then we can still believe in a single lineal arrow of time? This will then be the first concept clarified in the next chapter of this post.

CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. Difference between right, limited theories, and wrong ones.
Correspondence Principle: new theories include old ones as partial cases of a larger worldview: quantum expanded our continuous simple view adding a discrete, discontinuous view, with more information on the lower scales of reality.

Since if we call all those scales of relative size and quantity of information, the fifth dimension we shall find a simple metric equation:

Spe (entropic size in space) x Tƒi (information content ) = ∆i (constant for any i-scale).

So smaller systems have more information, and code larger systems (genes code bodies, memes societies, quantum particles atoms). We shall expand further our knowledge of the similar laws of those scales each one studied by a science and to that aim we must introduce the interaction between the two arrows of time entropy and information, and its combinations of ‘energy momentum’.

General systems Theory (Ab. GST) is the alternative philosophy of ‘stience’, (ab. space-time science) to the original model developed in the XVII around Newton’s concept of a single absolute, ‘lineal time clock’ and a single space-time continuum.

It follows obviously the principle of correspondence, according to which a new theory must agree with the old one within its limits. In the graph example, quantum physics expands the continuum  to the discrete, more detailed, informative dense world of smaller particles. While on the right side, GST makes an even larger expansion of our knowledge of the fractal, organic scales of the Universe, expanding the limits of present space-time science that applies only to the space-time continuum scale of ‘human size and beyond (Einstein’s relativity) to craft a theory of space-time that applies to all other scales of Nature and all other disciplines of science.

Yet if we restrict the model to a single space-time scale, needless to say we do not need the study of 5D metric equations and the model becomes a 4D space-time continuum.

Still even in a single plane we need to ad the ill-understood arrow of information or else we cannot explain any change which is not related a 4D models to ‘motions and translations in space’, but motions=changes in form, from evolutionary models of time in biology to the growing arrow of information in history and economics.  

So we must differentiate, from previous errors what is right and ‘gives correct results’ (quantum, relativity, etc.) which we will merely consider a limit of the larger view of GST, from what is wrong and gives wrong results (the theory that reality has a single time arrow of expanding motion and entropy, which must ad the arrow of information and correct the wrong models built with a single arrow). I.e.

And to do so, it expands the concept of the single arrow of time, used today in physics – that of entropy≈death – the arrow of disordered expansion in space, proper of electromagnetism and thermodynamics; to embrace also the arrow of information, with opposite properties that implodes space, more proper of biological and historic and gravitational studies. For example in cosmology, the restricted use of a single entropy arrow affirms the universe will expand and die because space between galaxies expands as we perceive only light moving between galaxies. Yet when we ad the arrow of gravitational information, which collapses space into mass (‘time curves space into mass’ einstein) which physicists astoundingly under the dogma of a single space-time continuum, dismiss in their calculus of the expansion of the Universe, galaxies implode space on its star plane and expand it on its perpendicular perceived central black hole plane, and both balance the Universe.

That is indeed the key word of all the models generated by the use of the two arrows of time-space, entropy and information and its ∞ energetic combinations of momentum, which the Universe conserves: an eternal balance. Hence duality of entropy and information and then the trinity of time arrows, as we ad its ‘momentum/energy combinations’. becomes the philosophy of science that expands the limit of reality, beyond the restricted models of earlier science based in entropy and continuity.



SCIENCE study repetitive patterns to predict the future.

As such it makes no sense without cyclical time, since only repetitive cyclical patterns that make events happen again allow science. In the next graph we see how cyclical time is needed in physical, biological and sociological (center) systems to make ‘science’ in astronomy, biology and history and economics:

sciences predictIn graph, all sciences predict the future of its species by projecting the patterns of previous cycles, obtained with sound data and logic, mathematical, objective models of reality. Models such as neo-classic economics that fail those proofs of truth must be considered ideologies. In the right, the evolution and extinction of species in planet Earth, whose evolution of information now transcends into machines, which are systems of metal that humans construct by imitating their biological organs and functions of energy and information, proper of animal life.

The fundamental proof of the truth of a model in science is its predictability.

Now the cyclical patterns of astronomy are obvious as all its ‘clocks are cyclical’:

In that regard, an example of the falsity of those economical models that ‘cheat’ humanity about their future should suffice:

The economist, stalwart of the system tried to prove the objectivity of the so called dismal science testing future economic indicators among garbage collectors and, taxi drivers, which gave common sense responses deans of economic schools and financial ministers, the carriers of happy lies which came last on the contest won by cabbies.

It came then to the conclusion, written with certain cynicism, that (classic) Economics was not a science.

A scientific model of SOCIAL SCIENCES: organisms of metal.

So what would then be a truly, scientific model of economics and history, which can predict the cycls of economics, and establish the necessary reforms of the system to cater to the needs of human beings?

The answer is obvious: since we live an organic, biological planet, and machines are just simple organisms of metal, which we construct imitating our functions and organs, so cars function as legs, cranes as arms, chips as brain, etc the only relevant science to study machines, their company-mothers and their relationship with human beings, is biology, in all its branches, as the human ‘super-structure’  of culture and memes is an offshoot of this biological nature of both human beings and machines, ‘evolving metalife’.

Thus in the graphs we found the 800-80 cycles of evolution of memes of metal that defined the first the civilisations of history and then the 80 year cycles of industrial r=evolution of machines, ending in wars. Suddenly social sciences become predictable if business as usual proceeds. Moreover we can reform the system to improve human life controlling those cycles, if humans want to design a better world.

And so cyclical, biological predictability and human praxis of control of Nature become rules of the GST application to social sciences.

It is an example of predictability an the scientific method, whose rules of truth apply also to GST. Let us resume them in an acronym…

 E=SC3   The tenants of fractal organicism: Cyclic Causality & Fractal, scalar space: ternary principles.

We MUST stress that contrary to pedantic belief and computer details, which fog the vision of the forest of physics, the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’. So it can be understood in simple ‘forest-like terms’ as a whole. Thus we keep in this introductory post the details of 5D physics simple, regardless of future extensions of complexity in the 4th line.

How can we simplify the forest to a level that any scientist with a standard degree of natural sciences understands a physical system, and prove our theories right, given the natural skepticism of physicists to larger views of ‘their details’? To the rescue comes epistemology the science of truth, which is above physicists, as it deals with the scientific method and its laws of truth.

To that aim, we will strictly obey those laws of truth of science, whose 4 pillars that sustain the whole building of science are:

Experimental Evidence, the mother of all battles, from where we must obtain a model of reality, proved by its ≈

Simplicity (Ockham’s razor), Logic Coherence, Correspondence with previous theories and Cyclical predictability:

E=SC3 thus resumes the needed test for all the theories models, facts, forms and events we will describe: Evidence, Simplicity, Causal coherence, Correspondence and Cyclical Predictability.

Yet while those are the analytical, detailed test of a scientific theory, in the fractal paradigm, the whole, which is complex arises from the fusion of those simplex, tested details. So we add a property of the whole:

E≈ S->C3 . That is, there will be always, a Generator Equation (E), which describes the whole system departing of the simplex parts of the system in space and its ternary symmetry of ages in time (S), which generate put together, a Complex, ternary, fractal structure that describe the whole system.

We resume in this manner the epistemology of classic science, to which we add the formalism of complex wholes, made of co-existing, ternary symmetries and structures, which we will develop through the isomorphic laws of all those fractal, ternary systems.

In the previous formal equation of physics, we used one of those formal structures of 3 time ages and space states to put together the simplex parts into the whole, time cycle of most physical matter:

Gas ≈entropic age < liquid wave > Solid ≈ Informative age.

We study the E=Sc3 elements departing from data collected by classic science, (Evidence) and equations known and tested by its simplicity and logic Coherence; the 2 elements, in which 5D physics innovates and must prove itself – correspondence with old theories and capacity to predict and explain well known events thanks to the cyclical nature of time events.

The correspondence principle connects classic physics and 5d, which extends 4D physics that correspond to a simplex limit of 5D fractal space-time, analyzed with the simplifications of:

  • A single 4D plane of space-time, which is a limit of an ∞ scalar Universe of multiple space-times, each one with a different size-rod of measure-speed of its time clocks.
  • A single, lineal mechanical clock, with a single steady tic-rhyhm, extended in 5D to an infinite number of closed clock-like paths or world cycles.
  • A single, continuous space with no motion, substituted by a fractal series of spaces, broken by the time cycles that enclose them, and gifted with energy-motion that becomes stillness in the simplification of a mind-mapping (Galilean Paradox)

So 5D physics extends 4D to all the planes and scales of space-time.

And further on introduces organic qualities of wholes by integrating ternary planes, ∆±1, into wholes systems, and integrating a  sum of  word lines, or open events into a full world cycle.

So we obtain a ‘whole’ picture of a system, both in time and space and through different scales of nature.

All this of course, physicists integrate but by ‘ad hoc’ methods’. For example, multiple scalar effects ad up through renormalization procedures, whose coherent, logic justification does not exist in 4D as it is precisely those 5D rules.

 General Systems Science: The Organic Unification of Knowledge. 

‘Reality is gifted with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos.’ Plato

Τhe 10 isomorphisms of the Universe. 

How can systematise those 3 elements into a formal model of the organic Universe, which can be further explored by future scientists? Τhe answer is the concept of isomorphic laws, which dates back to the work of the founder of this science in modern terms, Mr. Bertalanffy. So we structure the blog around this concept fully developed in this web.

Basically what Bertalanffy proposed is that a ‘scientific Universe’, which could be self-explained by the laws of organisms, must be proved to follow in all its systems, the same organic laws, which would be therefore iso=equal morphic= in form. At the time the science was in its infancy and it remain so for 50 more years, as there was no formalism to express the insights of similar laws in all disciplines, till in the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the sciences of cybernetics, information, complexity and systems, I was invited by the president of the founding association of those sciences, and explained the key to such formalism – the understanding of the laws of the 5th dimension, and the fractal nature of space and time, its relationship with energy-motion (as space has quantum energy-motion) and information (as time clocks carry he information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles).

Such simplification of the elements of which we are all made, which equates space and lineal motion and time and cyclical form, thus establishes the cause of all the isomorphisms of the Universe and its systems as we are all made of space and time and so the properties of space and time and the laws that connect parts and wholes through networks – the laws of the 5th dimension – is all what is needed.

Hence we shall establish for those 3 elements, which correspond to the 3 main disciplines of mathematical logic (space->geometry, time->algebra, 5D-> analysis), 3 x 3 sets of isomorphic laws, related to those 3 elements, fractal space, cyclical time and 5D scales, put together in all systems by he most fascinating element of the Universe, the 0-minds or mental, linguistic points of view, which coordinate and integrate together all the elements of a super organisms. 

So all the posts of this web are descriptions of scientific systems as fractal≈5D space-time beings, which display 3 x 3 isomorphic type of laws and are integrated by a mental ‘monad’, or integrative system of information, the mind and nervous system in biology; the crystal system in material forms, the chip in robots, the gravitational  black hole in galaxies, the capital in nations and its governments, the prophet and its code of information or memes and books of revelation in civilisations, the DNA nuclei in cells and so on.

It is a simple and not malicious Universe if humans wanted to understand with the same properties they have. But humans don’t. It is all about ego and putting man on top. And frankly lacking a humble ethics more proper of eastern cultures,

Τhus, for reasons that are of not interest to the reader, personal, cultural and of activism against the nuclear industry, despite the interest of american scholars for this model I did not follow that tiresome work of penpal, pen paper and pen-thagonal work – since today money in these sciences is in computers, robots and weapons, the machines fast evolving into organisms that can easily displace us on top of this planet. So, as humans do not seem interested in using knowledge to evolve mankind but the machine, I abandoned the scholar field and dedicated fully to activism. Now, retired of all things human I will pour thousands of pages of analysis on G.S.Τ.General Systems Τheory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and the Generator equation of fractal Space-Τime, its formalism in this web.

It will be done in iterative, repetitive more detailed analysis because the Universe is a repetitive mandala.

In the next chapter of this central point we introduce loosely in 10 sections the 10 isomorphisms, corresponding to the first line above, which expands this loose study. In the second line/chapter of this post, we introduce the main systems of biological, physical and social character as organic systems. In the 3rd chapter line above, its 10 isomorphic sets of laws.  And finally in the 4th line of hard science, each one studied a scale of reality we order all the laws known to science according to those 10 isomorphisms.

  • 3 isomorphisms related to the organic structure in space of all systems
  • 3 isomorphisms related to its motions in time and world cycles of existence
  • 3 isomorphisms related to its co-existence as part of a 5D of multiple scales.
  • And the 10th isomorphism of the linguistic mind and will of perception, which orders them all.

The purpose of the living Universe: Reproduction of space-time presents.

Now of course, this r=evolution of human thought will take time to impose itself, if humans do have such time left. As it requires to go to the origins of science, its mathematical and logic languages and evolve them further. This Einstein knew when he said ‘I am the only physicist who seems to know there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, moving at different speeds, Leibniz was right but if so we will have to change the scaffolding of science from its inception’. So he settled for a smaller change, applying the 5th non-Euclidean postulate to bend space into infinite time cycles.

When I confronted the mathematical formalism of the 5th dimension, I realized I had to go further on that path, and define all the undefined terms of mathematics, which since the discovery of the Non-Euclidean postulate that let infinite parallels cross a point had been undefined.

This was no solution though. Hilbert’s Axiomatic method of NOT  defining points, planes and lines (‘I imagine points, planes and lines’ he started in his famous ‘foundations of geometry’, the seminal book of XX c. mathematics), DOES NOT work in serious science. You cannot start without definitions of your initial postulates. The result was as bad as Euclid with his definition of a ‘point with no breath’.

So 5D metrics is born on a more healthy redefinition of mathematical postulates, as we redefine a ‘fractal point’, whose breath grows as we enlarge our information of it – making again mathematics realist as a science. Look around, you only see ‘points’, which grow when you see them closer and then they can fit infinite parallels. THAT WAS THE SOLUTION to the contradiction of a point with infinite parallels. It was  a Point of the 5th dimension. A point that grew in scale. And so a line was a series of points with breath -a WAVE! Thus the principle ‘wave-particle’ was embedded in mathematics, and so quantum physics started to streamline.

Then I realized those points broke reality into inner and outer regions. Thus planes were networks, fractal networks of points joined by flows of energy and information. Consider yourself. You are made of cell-points joined by informative, nervous networks and energetic, blood networks. And the point of maximal communication, your brain, was at the centre of your networks.

But the beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in its capacity to describe all beings with so few elements, and hence its constant recurrence in all languages and philosophies.

Indeed, this ternary structure with a mind at its centre, is the conclusion of the 6 biggest philosophers of science of the human tradition:

-Buddha and the Indian tradition of Atmans as souls which are knots communicated with the external world.

-Aristotle with his concept of a self-centred mind that moves a finite body, as its fixed God, of which there are ∞ in the Universe – ‘we are all Gods’ is said to have exclaimed.

-Descartes with his concept of minds that perceive worlds put by some devilish construction, with the rest extensa and time vortices it observes in the Universe.

– Leibniz with his concept of monads, as knots of information, mirrors of the external universe.

-Riemann and Einstein with his concept of points, through which ∞ parallels can cross.

The conclusion is obvious: the entire history of human knowledge appears filled with insights on the fractal paradigm, which were not properly interpreted.

Since Humanity excessively impressed by its first machines of measure has been blind to that obvious organic reality; where man as the most perfect organism of the Universe, is indeed ‘the measure of all things’ and the machine a primitive organism of metal.

Only now when we build robots as organisms, imitating life, we realise that mechanisms are simple organisms, and only now when we see the Universe together in all its co-existing scales, we realise physical and mechanical systems are also fractal super organisms. 

And all of them can be defined in space as ternary structures and in time as ternary ages, hence as super organisms tracing world cycles, through 3 fractal scales in the 5th dimension, giving origin to the Fractal i-logic Generator that resumes all what exists its parts in space, functions in time and space-time actions of survival, as organic systems that feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially into larger networks, which are the 4 canonical definitions of a life being

Thus you are in a living Universe, a living fractal of species made to the image and likeness of the whole.

I know that the simplicity of the Fractal Generator of the Universe baffles scholars, who think they know much more, and that the Universe cannot be ‘so simple and not malicious’ (Einstein).  In that regard it is more likely that you will grasp the beauty of the Universe if you are not a ‘pro’ scholar, just interested in the details that come from those thoughts of God. Of course in the web there are thousands of details and if scholars wanted to connect this simple Fractal Generator to their complex details, they would be able as i have done for 30 years,  but it is not the work of a single man, to connect and explain all their variations and species with the concept of a Universe made of fractal ternary space-time beings, organised as super organisms across at least 3 scales of reality, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-individual/organic and ∆+1 social/cosmological scales.

Now I am happy enough if you have read so far. At this point either you will be the kind of people who can learn and you are in the web that better mirrors the fractal Universe, among human beings. Or you are the kind of people who cannot get out of his mind, self-centred beliefs, and huge amount of information (disordered but looking good). And you won’t continue. I am not a good teacher and rather write because it makes me feel the Mandala of the Universe, unconcerned with those who might mirror my mirror. Still i like others to share that communion of the spirit that comes with the humble realisation we are made to the image and likeness of the whole, God/mind of the Universe. Westerners in that sense with their huge ego and abrahamic deluded religions of man as the chosen will have a more difficult task. Asians will find here the scientific mirror of their philosophies of yin-formative time-visnhu, yang-energetic space-shiva, and the infinite beings that combined them.

But once we have a clear picture of the elements and equations that generate the fractal Universe with its duality between the arrows of entropic space and informative time cycles, it will be much easier than it seems, to adequate all sciences to the fractal paradigm. If you want to do it, if you want to go back to school, if you want to refocus and repair your ego-centered mirror.

NOW we will be conceptual more than mathematical. Yes, there is a fractal equation that explains the distribution of galaxies in space, but this how is trivial. It is much more important to describe a galaxy as a fractal of stars, with an organic structure similar to a cell, with star mitochondria, black hole DNA and all the organic processes of birth, evolution and destruction of those galaxies. THIS IS THE core matter of this web: the study of the superorganims of the Universe, with verbal conceptual, biological laws. Only on the section of physics and mathematics we get heavily into quantitative numbers and, as we keep building the web, I will pour around 5.000 pages of analysis of physical, mathematical and astronomical systems. But that will take time. It will be the final phase of this construction. So in the 2nd line we have the organic study, the 4th line we will have the formal one.

Why we do so is obvious: humans have done a good job, specially with the help of computers to develop and exhaust the mathematical properties of the Universe and its fractal parts. They have done however an extremely lousy job on developing formal, logic models of its time cycles, causal processes, time dimensions, organic properties and so we are filling more that gap. Now if we didn’t think in words but in maths, all this would be unneeded.

Just thinking on calculus, it would be obvious that finitesimal fractal structures correspond to the discipline of analysis; just thinking on geometry & topology, we would realise that space is an organic fractal of the 3 canonical topologies of the Universe, and just think on algebraic groups and transformations we would realise of the complex logic of the 3 arrows of time, which are at the hear tot all the equations with 3 elements, F(x) operandi, G(y)… That is, if we were mathematical minds we would know that the 3 elements of the Universe correspond to the 3 branches of mathematics, 5D scalar analysis, temporal algebra and spatial geometry.

But we are verbal beings, so we need first to understand the mirror-language of words and its 3 elements, the subject-informative element, the object, energetic element and the action-verb or space-time element.

And we are visual beings, so we need to understand the codes of blue-information, red-energy and green-reproduction our mind uses to see the Universe. You see, languages are many but they try all to be ternary mirrors of the fractal generator, as beings are. Ultimately you then in a sentient, organic, linguistic Universe. And the fractal, mathematical spatial description of it is very limited also. We are going much further, trust me.  But again, you must be the Lion of Nietzsche and eat up your camel humpback, liberate your mind of so much scholarship, and become a child. Quite likely if you are over 20, you won’t.

Because the key to that fractal is that it is moving, alive, even if the mind sees it still. It is ‘young’ and reproductive.

This is indeed what the Universe is all about: a constant creative orgasm of self-similar beings, feeding on energy, gauging information, reproducing into networks of similar beings, evolving socially into larger wholes, dissolving back into cellular/atomic parts in the big-bangs of death… distorting the whole, from a limited perspective, as it has been the human scientific mind for so long. We shall refocus all that information with a more realist vision of a Universe, of which we are all just parts made to the image and likeness of the whole, so you can reach ‘enlightenment’, but only if your distorted ego-view of reality from your enlarged perspective is humble enough to accept the absolute relativity of each point of those scales.

And this is in a way the beauty of a fractal Universe in which each point is a world in itself- a Monad that has a still mirror of reality.  In that regard, the external perception of reality as a fractal, which is as far as most scientists go, is just the very external cover of the Living, Organic, Fractals of the Universe. It is just a 0.% of what we have to explain here: the organic, mental, bio-logical and mathematical properties of the living fractals of nature, all put together harmonised and rationalised, able to describe from human beings to matter states, from societies to galaxies with the same ‘isomorphic’ laws.

As we say humans have a very reduced image of the whole and al its properties, are self-centred in their point of view, which they think specially relevant and so, can only understand very limited number of languages-mirrors (mostly visual mathematics and verbal logic) and so its monads are naturally a very small fraction of all the information of the Universe. And what is worse, the ego paradox limits their interest. In brief, we confuse our infinitesimal mirror of the Universe with the whole Universe:

O (mind-mirror) x  ∞ Universe = ∆-still continuous single space-time mapping of reality (in man light space-time).

It will be difficult for me to take you out of such a reduced picture. To do so we shall first start with an even more reduced picture from where all others come from. The previous equation is indeed the equation of all minds, o-points which observe an infinite Universe, make a reduced mind-mirror or ‘world’ with it, and think they are at the centre of the Universe, because they do NOT know there is much more out there, as they only see their mind-mirror. Can we then at least logically come out of this mind-jail? Yes, we just did it, by generalising the equation. Put any mind-mirror at 0, a dog’s olfactory mind, a black hole’s gravitational mind, and you will get a different linguistic mapping, we can ‘imagine’ is there by the external actions of the dog and black hole, even if we cannot see as they do. Amazingly enough we will find many things about those minds – from the hyperbolic structure of the mind of insects, to the elliptic form of the mind-mirror of a black hole, which according to a physicist called Maldacena, represents in 5 compressed dimensions all the information of the 4-dimensional plane of its galactic body.

The Unification of sciences with 5D planes.

Let us see in a simplified graph those 3 elements, and how they can order all the species of the Universe, in different sciences, each one specialized in the study of a relative ‘plane of space-time size/speed’ of the Universe. Since indeed, the final concept to structure all knowledge is the realization that each science is merely the study of a relative scale of size of the Universe, from quantum physics (smaller scales), through chemistry (molecular scales), biology and history (human scales), geology and astronomy (cosmic scales):

Indeed, each science is just the study of a scale of relative size, Sp, and Frequency of time cycles, Tƒ, of the Universe. So if we put them all in a simple scale of co-invariant systems, whose product of size and time speed is co-invariant, we realise that each science is just the study of the species of an specific scale of size and temporal clocks, and putting them together we obtain, the scalar plane of a 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

Now since each of those scales can be defined as a sum of Species with its specific quanta of space and time frequencies, defined by a co-invariant equation of the 5th dimension, Sp x Tƒ = Ei or in dynamic terms, Sp < = > Tƒ,  a simple equation can resume your being; and as you are just a part of a tapestry of pieces of space-time called beings, that put together create the universe we can write in synoptic form the equation of the fractal Universe of space-time beings:

 U    = ∑ [Œ: ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ] ∆±∞

Whereas each fractal species of space-time, Spe<=>Tiƒ, is in itself a cell or fractal point of a larger super organism, extending across 3 relative scales (the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 social gravitational scales): ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ, which we shall call an existential function, Œ, or fractal point. And so the Universe is merely the sum of all those fractals of space-time across its infinite relative scales: U=∑Œ∆±∞

And yet amazing as it seems NOBODY has formalised these facts, beyond specific ‘species of reality’, mostly in the world of physics, into a theory of the whole tapestry of space-time which is the Universe, and all its parts, made to its image and likeness that makes sense, both logically, mathematically and empirically.

So the true problem is the fact that we must ‘redesign’ the mirror of linguistic, mostly mathematical equations, we use to observe the Universe – a logic, geometric ‘glass’ interposed between the universe of fractal space-time beings, and our mind that we need to ‘reduce’ the whole infinite information about all the beings of space-time of the Universe, to fit it into our mind.

We refocus this mirror of logic truths about time, and geometric truths about space, to acquire a crispier image of reality first.

In that regard the modern view of the fractal paradigm was born when scientists realized the reductionist view that using lineal time and a single arrow of future, entropic motions, implied for the new sciences of biology and cybernetics, systems sciences and information. So at the death of Einstein, which had shown that ‘time curves space into masses’, which are therefore clock-like vortices of time, and that there were ∞ time clocks in the Universe, they met at Macy’s New York and founded the world congress of Systems Sciences (ISSS), with the expressed purpose of improving the physicists single-entropy, lineal time view of the Universe adding the arrow of informative futures, so obvious in all systems of reality, or ‘arrow of life’ (biology) and ‘technology’ (information sciences) and Einstein’s General relativity (energy that becomes mass, in his landmark paper, M=E/c2: ‘can energy create mass’, unfortunately converted in its inverse entropic industry of Nuclear weapons, making mass energy ):

Thus since the 50s a new philosophy of science called General Systems Sciences had as purpose to explain the universe with those arrows of future time, entropy and information, the arrow of ‘death’ and disorder and the arrow of time and order. The main sub disciplines of this science would be:

  • Duality, which is the core philosophy that tries to model all systems of the Universe as systems made of entropic, expansive motions and informative imploding vortices of time-information, and its ‘present’ wave-body combinations. Of which the main dualities were in physical systems between informative gravitational forces and electromagnetic expansive, repulsive ones. Hence unlike physics, with its dogma of an entropic only Universe, the fractal paradigm and Systems sciences does NOT expect to unify gravitation and the other forces, on the contrary it believes its duality of informative=gravitational vs. electromagnetic=entropic forces is a clear proof of the veracity of its philosophy of science and worldview. 
  • Emergence, which tries to explain how parts become wholes through social networks of information, so the Universe displays a 5th dimension of scalar growth, from particles that become atoms, that become molecules that become cells, organisms, social systems of inorganic matter (cosmic bodies) and galaxies. Thus the search was for a ‘metric’ equation that explains how systems interact through its different scales of social evolution in the Universe.
  • Hierarchy, which studies the hierarchical organisation of systems, which can be roughly divided into 3 ‘social classes’, the neuronal, informative class that controls the system with its informative networks (brains in biology, black holes with gravitational systems, informative people-castes in control of the law, and money, the languages of social power, in human cultures – politicos and bankers), the re=productive, working class of the body of a system or society, and the energetic, entropic, territorial field in which the system preys.

So the concepts behind the fractal paradigm were clear from its inception, as they just mimicked the structure of a universe, which we know since Einstein, to have cyclical clocks of time, since Galileo and the discovery of telescopes and microscopes, to have scales of different size, since quantum theory, to be in perpetual motion, as even the smallest quanta of space is NOT a fixed form but a rotary or lineal motion (with angular or lineal momentum), and to have both, social structures and hierarchical classes. How to put all this together and moreover to make a simple formalism based in mathematical and logic concepts able to explain it all simple and nice according to the principles of the scientific method that expect theories to be simple, economical and include all previous theories as its limit, was the goal of those congresses and sciences, and for 50 years it was not possible to find such formalism.

Then with the arrival of fractal mathematics, slowly researchers realized that all systems could be mathematically explained with fractal equations, in which similar forms evolved into social networks that became wholes. So the mathematical analysis was possible. It was still though needed the conceptual, logic model regarding the multiple time clocks of the Universe, its order, and the metric equations of the 5th dimension that allowed ‘travels’ through those scales of parts and wholes, and of course, the cornerstone of the whole building – duality, how to put together the 2 arrows of relative time, future information and entropic disorder for each fractal part of reality where we observe ‘locally’ those 2 arrows at work in different moments.

To that aim the key change of paradigm was to realise that Newtonian absolute space-time was false – something quantum and relativity theorists acknowledge a century ago, and Leibniz’s concept of relational time, of a universe made of beings that are vital spaces with different time clocks, self-centred into an informative frame of reference or point of view – hence a Universe of infinite worlds of space-time, was right.

We are all beings made of vital space with entropic motions, harnessed by cyclical clocks of time which carry the information of the Universe in its frequency and form. So we need to explode the Universe and rebuild it from its beginning as Einstein wished to do when he affirmed ‘I seem to be the only physicist who knows there are infinite time clocks in the Universe. Leibniz was right, but if so we have to rebuild the foundations of sciences from its first principles’, which are its time clocks, its vital spaces, and the 5th dimension that orders them.

So at the 50th anniversary of ISSS, when i was made the international chair of this science, Duality, I introduced the only standing formalism of Leibniz’s relational space-time that puts together all those sub disciplines of General Systems Sciences.

To that aim I added to the arrows of entropy and information the concept of a 3rd arrow of time, which combines the relative future, dominant arrow of information and the relative past, entropic arrow into wave-body like systems, giving birth to a Fractal Generator equation for all those space-time systems:

Spe (limbs/fields of entropy) <ST (body-waves that iterate information ) >Tiƒ (heads-particles of information).

Now a fractal generator is the logic equation that through iterations and variations create all the scales of a fractal system. It is very simple, as in Mandelbrot’s fractal, z+c2, but precisely through its constant dynamic feed-back and forth iteration, creates all the complex beings of reality. So does the Universe by mixing lineal entropic motions and cyclical forms, into infinite combinations, of limbs-bodies-heads and fields-waves-particles.

So that simple generator, is the essential logic formalism used in this web to describe all fractal beings of the Universe.

And the 5th dimension, of scalar parts and wholes and its metric equation: Spe x Tiƒ= Constant body-wave, is the metric that orders all those systems.

Both together construct the fractal Universe of ∞ self-centered space-time beings made to its image and likeness.

To study them, as 5 Dimensional space-time beings, we divide the analysis of that fractal generator, and all its species, into 10 sets of isomorphic laws, related to each of those 3 elements 5 Dimensional metrics, fractal space and cyclical time, put together in each system by a 0-point of view, or mental linguistic mapping, which uses different monad-like mirrors and languages to guide the survival of the system in the outside Universe – mathematical geometry, in physical systems, genetic languages in biological systems, memetic languages in human societies and so on.

%d bloggers like this: