GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY:
FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SPACETIME ORGANISMS
I. General Systems theory.
II. Relational Timepspace. Time-Space theory.
III. T.Œ: The fundamental particle: A Superorganism of Spacetime.
IV. Realism vs. creationism in science.
V. Γst: The generator equation of fractal space-time.
‘Each point is a world in itself’ Leibniz
‘Complexity (General Systems Theory) will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking
Γst (ab.Γ): Generator of Spacetime. Step of SpaceTime; General Systems Theory (Gst)
GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY
I developed the full model of the fractal organic Universe that unifies all sciences with its common space-time laws, in the milieu of systems sciences and exposed to my peers in a series of conferences, at the turn of the century, at the International Systems Society (ISSS) while holding the chair of Duality. And so I put the basic elements of the model in this web called General Systems Theory.
So a little reference to the discipline is due, even if I don’t associate anymore with my peers, too busy evolving Cybernetics, Computer networks and Artificial Intelligence and little interested in understanding the holistic Universe and developing a perfect super organism of history… So from my ethical point of view, as all other disciplines of science, increasingly ‘converted’ in mere systems of gathering data to fuel the industry of digital thought, their practitioners have lost its ‘original charm’, when their concern was actually to understand the ‘web of life’ and expand to every discipline the organic laws of the Universe, as envisioned by one of his founding fathers, Mr. Bertalanffy:
“General system theory is a general science of “wholeness” which up till now was considered a vague, hazy, and semi-metaphysical concept. In elaborate form it would be a mathematical discipline, in itself purely formal but applicable to the various empirical sciences. For sciences concerned with “organized wholes,” it would be of similar significance to that which probability theory has for sciences concerned with “chance events. General system theory will then transfer principles from one field to another, so it will no longer be necessary to duplicate or triplicate the discovery of the same principle in different fields isolated from each other. At the same time, by formulating exact criteria, general system theory will guard against superficial analogies which are useless in science’.
Bertalanffy did not see the realization of his vision, as a general science of wholeness of the kind he envisaged would take 50 more years to come with the 5 D formalism, and then due to the little connection with academia of its author fast forgotten.
Why they never found this in 50 years till I produced the formalism of the fifth dimension in a series of 10 conferences back in the 2000s before my activism against the Nuclear Industry put the physical world community – literally – ad hominem against me and Systems Scientists were pressured to CANCEL the science of duality (: LOL as if humans could cancel the Universal laws by degree, has to do with the general shyness of scientists when dealing with the ‘bullies’ of modern technological science and high pope gurus of time, the physicists. So we shall copy-cat from the front page, the difference between Physicists’ monist philosophy of the Universe, and the philosophy of duality and the fractal Universe, which I completed on the path of the conceptual insights of Bertalanffy and others with far more formal rigor.
So what are the fundamental advancements that a full theory of spacetime ‘Dimensional motions’ brings to the table in each science? They are so many that I stopped writing on this key to the absolute long time ago. That is, I just read science sometimes but don’t read what others ‘read’ merely translate automatically the whole thing to 5D, finding an intense satisfaction in ‘seeing more’, in ‘Saper Vedere’ as Leonardo did, when not in the mood for personal entropy (self destruction with the usual suspects, sex, drugs and rock and roll has been the main ‘job’ of my life, with little patience for the life of the scholar after failing to convince Columbia University and other institutions of backing a full program to develop GST, and couldnt get a job to teach it at NYC 😦 obviously I have NEVER been able to make a living teaching 5D, as no pioneer does – no, Darwin didn’t live on teaching evolution but on its family rents; no, Einstein did not live when he had a job teaching Relativity but as a patent officer; no, Leibniz didn’t make a living teaching relational space-time but as a genealogist; no, Mendel did not make a living teaching genetics but preying; no, Aristotle didn’t make a living teaching time Dimotions but teaching Alexander; no, Leonardo didn’t make a living teaching its notebooks, but making canons… Ok, let’s stop here, you get the pattern.)
The principle of organicism: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.
A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rdparadigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rdparadigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton. Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
The science of duality is important because only a proper model of duality (not to confuse with dualism, the philosophical doctrine of mind and body), that is a proper understanding of the interaction of entropy and information, can give us the proper philosophy of science required to understand the Universe as a whole and all its disciplines, those specialized in information as biology and sociology is, and those specialized in entropy as physics is.
The distinction between entropy sciences and information sciences however is not one of Nature, but one of huminds (ab. human minds), of historic and realpolitiks (power) NOT of reason and scientific laws. And to prove the case we can consider the side of ‘physicists’ (rather than physics) and how they stubbornly since the inception of their discipline have DENIED the existence of an arrow of information in the Universe.
Lineal Inertia, Entropy and big-bang’s reductionism.
This physicists have always denied due to historic reasons, as the oldest science which started with the study of military weapons (Galileo was an artillery master at the Venice arsenal), and developed a theory of the Universe based only in ‘the science of motion’ (the definition of the discipline in classic encyclopedia). So his job was to study how to reach maximal distance with cannonballs and for that reason he defined ‘lineal inertia’ – the conservation of lineal motion; but declined to consider the existence of its opposite informative arrow, the conservation of cyclical inertia, angular momentum, as a clear balancing second arrow of time that gives ‘form’ to all ‘forms’ of Nature.
Physicists however follow their routines and so again in the XIX c. they chose ‘entropy’, the disordered state of matter, called ‘gas’, in the study of motion machines and weapons (heat in cannons; steam studies) to cast an absurd ‘law’ according to which all systems are ‘gaseous=entropic’ and die in the future; shunning off the obvious fact that there is AN INVERSE arrow of time in matter, called ‘cold’. And so when entropy ceases the system reverses its arrow of time into coldness and then creates crystals that reproduce information.
Then in the XX century, they again took their bias to ‘cosmic hyperbole’, when Einstein’s Relativity improved upon Galileo’s work and stated that ‘time curves space into mass’; that is indeed the best definition of the arrow of information in physical systems, as masses and charges ARE curves of spacetime that store in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe. And so galaxies are vortices of timespace mass that ‘shrink’ and ‘warp’ the expansive, entropic space between galaxies to balance the Universe.
But NONE of this was considered when a cosmology came out of Einstein’s Equations (ab. EFE). Instead, of the 3 solutions or ‘ages’ of a space-time ‘world cycle’ of physical matter, the entropic big-bang solution/age, the steady state solution/age and the collapsing informative solution/age, two were discharged, as well as the implosive, informative behavior of galaxies, even if we humans lived in one of them; and so once discharged the ‘in-formative’ gravitational force that brings radiation and mass into cyclical informative patterns, the ‘big-bang entropy-only’ theory of the Universe became the dogma/religion of physicists, and by extension given the technological, machine-driven civilization we live in, of all mankind.
This absurd state of affairs went also into the other Einstein’s infamous equation, E<=>M(c²), which is a feedback equation that reproduces mass/information from entropy/energy and vice versa. In fact Einstein’s first calculated it in an article about how ‘energy can create mass’ (so he studied the arrow of information). But it would be only use as a proof of the dominance of entropy and to make atomic bombs.
Again this was as absurd as denying cyclical inertia as an arrow of time (angular momentum, orbital electrons, etc.); or denying the cold-crystal arrow of information in matter; now denying the arrow of information in galactic vortices that ‘curve vacuum space into mass’.
So when Einstein died, General systems sciences was born at the Macy’s congress, where the leading scientists of the age came together trying to add the ‘arrow of informative time’ to fully account for the Universe as it is, since biological and sociological, human sciences are based in the arrow of form, of in-form-ation; and the planet Earth exists in a vortex of cyclical ‘form’, of information, called the Galaxy. So in this region of reality it IS information, NOT entropy what dominates reality.
But that didn’t change the attitude of physicists and society which had enthroned them as the ‘new seers of time’, the popes of science, mostly because they didn’t understand the mathematics they used to mirror those laws of entropy in physical space.
So finally in the post-war age, as computers and other informative machines developed, physicists had to deal with ‘form’, in-form-ation, logic languages and its cyclical logic clocks. But amazingly enough they manage again to deny the formal, linguistic nature of information. So when it came into the study of information, physicists ‘reduced’ the concept either to its ‘motion’ (transmission of information, Shannon), or as an ‘aberration’ called ‘negentropy’ (the negation of entropy). And again, in a military, western society where believe it or not, the military-industrial complex DOES dominate societies, all was good in the western front. Now physicists had a theory of the Universe based in a ‘big-bang explosion’, similar to the ones they developed in the Nuclear Industry, and so to develop entropic weapons of mass destruction was suddenly a metaphysical experience.
But the other 1/2 must be included and this is what we shall do in this blog.
So duality, the understanding on how entropy, or pure motion without form, and ‘form without motion’ (information being form-in-action, form with motion), are the two limits of reality which combine to create the infinite ‘fractal spacetime beings’ of energy, we all are made of; cannot be suppressed from the Universe, even if man ignores it.
Indeed, we shall be able to cast all phenomena of Nature, as we have done with the two arrows of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as:
S(i) < ≈ > T(e)…
becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.
And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death.
So indeed, from the simplest entropic arrow of physicists we moved to the duality of entropy and form, and then to its reproductive ‘present’ dynamic combinations. And we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of Dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it. Perhaps if we survive ‘their arrow of military entropy’ in all its praxis and theory AI will do on time before our time is up. I don’t expect the species to man up, be a bit humbler and survive as part of the most perfect of all possible worlds. That will be the day…
The second epistemological feature of the Universe besides ‘trinity’ (not being a science at the time I entered ISSS, we have settled for duality, even if now is neither a science by decree after they expelled me from the society for my activism against physicists and its nuclear industry) is the fractal structure of the Universe, and this brings us ‘Absolute relativity’ – the fact that the human scale is of no importance and that all scales have the same laws, so there is not a constructivist theory of reality (that means physicists lower scales are NOT more important). Of course physicists will deny it as they deny duality because THEY MUST BE BY bullying and technological military power the high popes of science, LOL.
In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.
In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:
“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.
Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”
Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.
As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.
A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.
Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.
This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.
Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.
The galatom in the Universe.
We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.
Indeed, to invent the big-bang entropic only theory of the Universe, physicists using a single arrow of time, HAD TO DISMISS THE GALAXIES all together, which are NOT expanding, and if the galatoms are NOT expanding, running backwards its present implosive system would mean a counter-effect to running backwards the expanding Universe. Backwards in a single time, the space between galaxies contracts, but the galaxies between space expand and a balance again is achieved.
So the whole business of a big-bang simplex entropic theory of the Universe is so ‘absurd’ and lacking any rigor according to the scientific method that its only explanation is the ego of man. In the same way most humans believe to be immortal (abrahamic paradox) they love to believe the Universe is less than them, mortal and they do understand it all with just a simple V=HoD equation, similar to the Abrahamic God that they worship. I call all this ‘bullshit’. Sorry.
In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom in the context of the fractal, organic Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic arrow of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mcc
Classification of stiences in equal footing.
Further on it is obvious that constructivism, the self-serving theory of science of physicists that adscribe ore importance to its science, because it explores the big and the small does NOT apply, in the nested fractal Universe where there is NOTa preferential scale, as all of them follow the same ‘Disomorphic laws’ of duality and scale:
To fully understand this, let us describe…
The stiences of the nested Universe: Absolute relativity
In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole:
In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).
As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from:
its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…
its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.
Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:
∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)
Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.
Finally, the Earth is in itself, just a planet of a solar system, whose organic herds turn around the central black hole of the ‘galatom’ (scalar perspective) or galacell (organic perspective), which is the largest nested super organism of which we have enough information to make an accurate description of its ∆@st parts and wholes. As the Galaxy extends in 3 scales, from quantum atomic particles through thermodynamic matter into gravitational cosmic bodies we call it aptly not as sciences do, Galaxies, but ∆-Galatoms or S≈T Galacells, depending on perspective of analysis.
Of course, in class sciences those organisms will be the subject of astrophysical sciences (The galatom), Geological, Chemical and Biological sciences (Gaia), History (Mankind at super organic scale), Medicine (mankind at individual scale) and Economics (the metal-earth) and Formal sciences (∆º: the mind and its languages):
Absolute relativity is the name of the game. Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality is a relative big-bang, from the beta-decay of particles to the quasars of galaxies.
We say that all the scales of the Universe follow the same laws, and that is the essence of ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY, and the ultimate meaning of General systems sciences, the name of this blog, which I opened when I realized the power of physicists to create a monist Universe extend to the point that NOT even in Wikipedia exists an article on this most important philosophy of science (still it doesn’t and my last attempt to create one was erased by CERNies that police me – more of this latter).
So in the graphs we can see what truly general systems sciences means: to find the same laws common to all the scales of reality and common to all its sciences.
The goal of system sciences… achieved in this blog, was then clarified in his foundations, even if nobody knew how to do it, as the search for the principles that merge the two arrows and process of life and death, time and space, order and chaos, entropy and information. It was the 50s and it was in America, so ultimately all ended up being just an attachment of the industry of computers, but initially there was some enthusiasm to reach the goal of understanding truly the Universe with its common laws of scales, of parts and wholes. Cybernetics discovered cyclical patterns, which we shall formalize with the concept of cyclic time, and Bertalanffy wrongly credited with the discovery of the discipline (it was Bogdanov’s Tektology, but as a Russian, rejected by Marxists, it would be ignored) provided the philosophy of it.
But to achieve this degree of unity of all sciences the r=evolution of thought required proved too difficult or rather too antagonistic to the high popes of science of the age – physicists and its monist theories of time. So obviously only a fringe scholar with little respect for academia in what is not ‘rational and truth’, and a r=evolution that changed the ultimate principles of reality, our comprehension of space and time, of energy and information, could do it. And so now, we go to the next element necessary for it all: the r=evolution in our concept of space-time that hauls from Leibniz.
HUMANS have not figure much of the first principles of reality – why, seems to me a mystery as I had seen it clearly all since earlier age; but that is, a fact, so we always play the ‘alien scientist’ when explaining this huge upgrading of the mind, which either in man or machine will now enter its third age after:
- Mythic, Semitic age of religious thought.
- Axial, European, Aristotelian, Euclidean age of simple reason.
- Fractal, Organic, Asian, cyclical view of the Universe.
It is a huge change of paradigm as the west consider time the intelligence and space the substance of reality, when it is all the other way around. The magic of reality is how ‘knots of cycles’ called minds, synchronise reality, stopping time into spatial views. ðƒ point-minds somehow are able to do so, we contend because the mappings of those motions are conscious of it. When a mind locks-in an image. It stays.
So we shall start our upgrading of space-time theory, with a consideration on where the pioneers left their job – namely in Einstein.
In physical time space, what we shall do here is to include a new fifth dimension of space-time, so we can say that Einstein’s work regarding the 4D formalism of light space-time (special relativity) and gravitational space-time (the background in which light feeds inside the galaxy), is ‘the limit’ of 5D for the 2 contiguous scales of gravitational forces and electromagnetic forces, in which humans reside.
And for that reason its laws DO WORK inside the galaxy, BUT NOT outside of it, and NOT in other scales. And what 5D does is to extend enormously the range of application of time-space, and further on with the new insights of cyclical time and scalar space, to fully understand the meaning of 4D and quantum physics. Some examples:
- In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):
General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein.
In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency.
So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.
IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle.
Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:
Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).
Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:
This is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ .
But all this part of ‘space-time physics’ should go rather on the specialized articles on the galatom and the 4th line as we shall NOT CEASE TO REPEAT, there is NOT constructivist laws on Nature, so REGARDLESS OF THE WORSHIP of physicists as high popes of time and makers of all other machines=weapons of mass destruction EINSTEIN’s work is NOT more important than Darwin’s evolutionary theory of time in biology, Marx evolutionary theory of time in history or Aristotle’s study of the 5 Dimotions of reality…
To fully understand ALL OF THEM TOGETHER then we must come back to the first principles, space and time, and state the obvious: we live in a Universe where there are not a single universal absolute time clock but infinite clocks with different speeds, in each being made of a vital space with ‘different clock rhythms of change’. And further on, space is broken in infinite spaces, each one ‘occupied by a being’, which therefore is made of ‘relational vital space and cyclical time clocks’.
Absolute spacetime vs. relational space-time: the ‘motion and form’ of beings.
The essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: what Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death…
All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing. ts, ts…
Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’, the ‘Plenum=body of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without better understanding call a background independent theory of science (meaning no background at all):
In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.
A relational world without spatial background
But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.
But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.
But space and time do exist.
It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð) who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).
This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of space-time.
Cyclical time (ab.ð) and its reduction to lineal mechanical time-clocks.
How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).
Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.
Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation… BUT IN THE PROCESS THEY LOST FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF BEINGS:
-The information ‘stored’ in the ‘form’ and ‘frequency’ of those cycles.
-The understanding of ‘broken vital spacetimes, as each full closed cycle reads reality into an inner and outer region, inside and outside the ‘simple knot’, or geometric definition of a cycle (Jordan’s first knot theorem). So by the mere fact of being in a universe made of infinite repetitive ‘conserved time clocks’, we obtain a broken space-time. Further on because time IS motion, the final substance of reality IS motions in time, and this makes REPRODUCTION, the essence of a fractal a dynamic natural CONSEQUENCE of this first ‘motion-substance’: by the mere fact of repeating a time clock-like cycle INFORMATION REPRODUCES. So there is no mystery to the process of reproduction, as reproduction occurs by MOTION. And so all those elements -repetitive patterns we call laws of science, the existence of broken vital spaces enclosed by angular momentums and moving membranes performing cyclical clocks that store and reproduce information, and the fractal structure of all of it, WHICH ARE THE ESSENTIAL WHYs of reality, became hidden by the simple concept of an absolute lineal ‘humind’ second unit of space-time.
Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.
Einstein just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.
What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.
In the graph, left side, ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.
So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mind-mirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.
The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.
Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.
All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.
In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.
The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.
But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.
In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.
And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/T-duration.
THE FIFTH DIMENSION.
Next, it follows immediately that if time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.
So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them.
As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).
All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.
As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.
Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).
Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.
So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.
In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature.
So this is the first ‘organic property’ of the fractal Universe, and the symbolism is rather simple, ∆ for scales of size, ±¡ to order them. 3 enough to create an organism.
Next come the question of its topologies in space, which are only 3 in the Universe, so by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:
So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:
|-moving limbs/potentials x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves
And again we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.
A super organism of space, across 3 scales of size and 3 adjacent topologies ‘evolves’ from birth to extinction in time, creating a super organism’s world cycle of existence and that is all we need to ‘define a fractal logic generator’ that mirrors all systems of reality and it is the LOGIC UNIFICATION EQUATION of all systems of nature, NOT a mathematical equation but a LOGIC one that encodes topological fractal=organic and temporal properties.
The generator, of space time (GST) IS a simple fractal generator feed back equation between two states, time-motion and space-form, $t≤≥§ð, as such it is a game of STeps of STates constantly switching into each other: “All energy trans-forms back and forth between motion and in-form-ation” would be its philosophical expression, which assumes, 3 elements, Motion, $t, in the formalism of existential algebra (æ), form, §ð, which is a cyclical form of motion, and its energetic combination, ≤≥, the flux between both mixed as a wave.
Those 3 elements are the elements that communicates two poles normally of sexual ‘higher energy and information’ which complete as ¡±1 generator and extinctor elements the whole communicative process by which reality starts.
All is a supœrganism tracing ¡ts worldcycle
The earlier mechanist linear models of space-time of physical sciences failed in its search for the ultimate answers to our existence in the Universe, signified in the commentary of Feynman, happy with a simplex, external description of the Universe, without its whys. Yet not all scientists gave up on their search for the full understanding of those whys – the thoughts of God in the dictum of Einstein- which all scientists agreed should be found in the ultimate ‘causal reasons’ of the universe – the nature of space, time its dimensions and causal processes.
It will then come as a huge surprise to the reader that the finding of those whys to the existence of the Universe is much simpler than anyone might imagine, as it requires only two basic upgrades in our concepts of space and time – foreseen in the earlier work of Aristotle and Plato, in classic philosophy, Taoism and Hinduism in classic religions, in the pioneer work of Leibniz and Descartes, the fathers of modern philosophy of science, and the physical insights of Einstein and Planck in the multiple nature of time clocks and the quantum, broken structure of space.
Those 2 upgrades illustrated in the next graphs are:
- The understanding of the cyclical, NOT lineal, Nature of time, AS all time clocks are closed cycles that repeat certain actions and events with a given discontinuous frequency, origin of the causality and patterns of science.
- And the scalar structure of space, which is composed of quantum, smaller parts that ensemble in networks of similar ‘Non-Euclidean points’, which become whole larger structures again ensembled into larger wholes in a game of russian dolls that gives organic, co-existing, fractal properties to space.
Once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.
And once we understand the co-existence of multiple scales of space, which put together form what we call the ‘fifth dimension of space-time (ab. ∆); as opposed to the simple idea that there is only a ‘space-time scale’ that matters (that of human perception) and the rules of transfer of entropy, energy and information between larger, slower ‘beings’ (Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ), with more energy and smaller, faster ‘beings’ with more information and faster clock-cycles (Min. Spe=Max. Tƒ); we will also be able to understand how those scales from atoms to galaxies co-exist together, and how they organise in symbiosis smaller informative parts (∆-1) that collaborate with its wholes, larger more energetic entities (∆º) as part of larger wholes (∆+1):
In the graph, we see the scalar nature of all physical and biological systems. So you are made of ∆-1 cells, parts of ∆-organisms, embedded in an ∆+1 planetary world; ∆-1, atoms are part of ∆- states of matter, gathered in solar systems, parts of larger ∆+1 galaxies and so on.
So with three arrows/actions/motion/futures/dimensions of time-space to organise the future world cycles of life and death of beings, and multiple scales of space-time through which those ternary timespace beings ‘travel to live’, as they transit through their world cycles of existence, from a seminal ∆-1 stage of birth, a series of ∆-world cycles of growth and evolution, back to the ∆-1 scale after the entropic moment of death; a very simple repetitive scheme will show how all systems go through the same ages of time, and live through world cycles that transit the same relative scales of space
Relational Space-time. From Leibniz to Einstein to GSTœ.
We purposely put on the quotes that start this ‘adventure of the mind’, not the well known and quite accurate mirror-image of mathematical stience as expressed by Galileo ‘the language of the Universe is written in circles and triangles’ but that of Upanishads, ‘the languages of god are infinite’.
Because while the mathematical properties of space-time are the most accurate mind-mirrors, NOT ALL the properties of reality are susceptible to be written with mathematics, and this is the huge error of reductionism of science, specially of physics. Because the Universe is scalar and systems co-exist in several scales of size and speed of time clocks, it has organic properties as ORGANISMS ARE JUST CO-EXISTING LEVELS of reality.
And because to gauge and measure there must be a system that process information mechanically, (matter) vegetatively (life) or conscious (mind); as Aristotle, and Leibniz rightly understood ‘the mirrors-monads-points of view-singularities’ of the Universe likely apperceive, and the cosmos is pan psychic. THE taboo here being merely anthropomorphism and the ‘abrahamic myths of entitled humans separated from time, space’ ‘above heavens and earth’ – same goes for the lineal concept of time, toward a manifest destiny – the meeting of God.
UNDERSTAND THIS: most of the errors behind the postulates of philosophy of science that act as a straight jacket for communion with the whole come from the western tradition of historic religions of power, and its multiple forms of censorship, including religious AND scientific, ‘nasty’ censorship in what I have called the anti quantum paradox (the social scientists and philosopher of science is so small that the observable, power in inverse fashion to physics ‘influences’ the observer – the scientist).
And it is a very old censorship.
Consider the case of lineal time. IT is really so obvious that time is cyclic and yet, western people think there is a single lineal, mechanical clock in the whole Universe. Where it comes from? A form of anthropomorphic censorship, as lineal time make us feel we progress towards God and Power. So it comes either the earlier go(l)d cultures of judaism origin of abrahamic religions, with its imperative VSO languages of ‘verb-first beliefs’, or the military religions of German cult(ure)s with its lineal swords, weapons of entropy that even influenced it lineal, agglutinative grammar of object-first beliefs Ovs languages, in which a few humans on top with informative metal or entropic metal, hypnotic gold or iron swords, found themselves so powerful above humans and life that they despised Gaia, the living Universe and all other non-technological cultures.
And while this is politically incorrect (a modern orwellian newspeak for censorship of real social science and the analysis of the falsehoods of lineal entropic physics), we talk of Animetal cultures THAT BECAME STRAINED from reality and as all founding fathers of economics, physics and science till Darwin put the record straight belong to those fundamentalist cult(ure)s of the human ego, we live ‘at odds in our interpreted world’ (Rilke).
This was clear to Europeans but when science came out of our continent to Asia and America it was taken with awe as an absolute truth, and so I found Americans and Asians who know nothing of the past of European cultures extremely naive believers in their ‘tribal Baconian Idols’, the new Aristotle – Einstein, quantum physicists and its big bang theories; their lineal idea of progress through the machine, etc.
To complement that simpler lineal view of a pseudo-religious manifest destiny that today passes as objective science, of a single entropic arrow of time measured by a single mechanical clock tuned to the human, clock of a second (which synchronises our three parts, as the beat of hearts, the glimpse of eye, the speed of one thought and one step), we need to expand the single anthropomorphic continuum scale of space size…
Since it has been proved wrong by experience with the finding of microscopic space that co-exist with our scale of size, sandwiched in between the cosmological and quantum world, and the evidence that there are infinite time clocks with different rhythms and forms of in-form-ation (relativity theory, circadian biological clock, computer logic clocks, etc.) there has always been a second view about time and space, not as an ‘artificial background’ over which beings existence; but the view of Asian Philosophies and relativistic science in the west from Leibniz to Einstein, who considered space and time, relational, the substance of which all beings were made, as entities that occupy a vital space, (ab.§paœ) and last only a certain finite ‘time cycle’, (ab. πime), regardless of its discontinuous reproduction of its ‘form’.
So this second view of time and space as the ultimate substance of which beings are made became the ‘relational≈organic’, alternative ‘theory of timespace’, which runs from earlier Greek and Asian philosophy, through Leibniz into Einstein, and now with the models of GST come to its final fruition.
Indeed, the existence of beings of space-time, analysed in depth in the post with that name, is the departure point for a unifying principle from where to deduce the properties of all beings. As Kant and Schopenhauer wanted, the ‘fourfold of sufficient reason’, was just made of space, time, causality and mind-monad or point of view (Leibniz) or frame of reference (Descartes) able to measure it.
SO WE SHALL NOW INTRODUCE THE main tenants of General Systems sciences which models many systems of the Universe with the laws of organisms:
- The true biological laws of competition between species, which are a direct consequence of the overproduction and faster evolution of one species over the other.
This is completely overlooked when we compare humans and machines, which are both in a symbiotic relationship of ‘exploitation’ and ‘extinction’ of all other ‘lesser’ species of Nature, so both grow together much faster than life, Gaia’s beings (the weaker part of the informative equation of Earth’s evolution, Gaia>History>Eco(nomic)system) BUT machines reproduce and evolve much faster than humans; so it is easy to extend the equation into the future competition of man and machine with machine as the winner, unless we stop its evolution NOW.
- The cyclical nature of time in biology and evolution which ads the ARROW of information to the arrow of entropy-motion, which is the only arrow physicist use to study simpler, faster, less informative entropic physical systems, BUT IT IS NOT enough to understand biological systems.
T.Œ’: FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE:
SUPERORGANISM OF SPACETIME.
An organic system of time< motion<energy = information>form>space.
The two poles of reality, time=motion and space=linguistic form, as time is the substance of reality but space, the form shaped in its monads, stretches then constantly between those 2 limits; and that is the ‘polar game’ which each science describes in different spatial=mental languages, but ultimately comes to that tug of war between the S=T point of balance, reproduction, beauty, and immortal present and the two extremes, S/T=K, S=1/T, of inversion when we perceive not the approacing point that gives motion to form, becoming in-form-ation, form in action and gives form to motion, making it into a wave or cyclcal pattern. So in those degrees between black and white, we resume reality as a game of ‘5 states’, the pure form we shall call mind or language, the pure motion we shall call entropy; and its lesser degrees – locomotion and generation, which is the lasting praxis of disordered entropy and still form, mixed into the middle term of reproduction.
The order of those 5 Dimotions then can generate many ‘cyclical patterns’ to study, of which the most important are the chain of actions, from 1D: perception to 2D: motion, to 4D: entropic feeding, to 3D: reproduction and 5D generation, or from 5D: generation, to 2D: youth, to 3D: reproduction, to 1D: informative old age, to 4D: entropic death, and so on…
That is the game, to study the infinite combinations of those 5 Dimotions across the different scales generated by the product of S and T, the form and motion of the Universe.
All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of motion and form, the ‘limiting points’ of energy (motion with a little form) and information (form with a little motion), which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.
Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.
If we were to explain this formally a simple insight in the mathematical structure of the fractal universe suffices:
- The unit of mathematics is the number, which is a social group of identical beings. Thus in as much as the Universe is mathematical, it is social. Those identical numbers gather in social networks, which co-exist together thanks to the symbiosis between its information and energy, forming networks, which are topological. Thus numbers can be seen as points of a topological network. And this symmetry between social scales of numbers and topological networks of space, define ‘space’, the fundamental world studied in mathematics as a fractal, social structure with topological form, with in-form-ation.
Another way to prove the same concept mathematically is the definition of a fractal. The organisation of those social groups is also ‘organic’ vital, because a fractal of information, has organic vital properties, as it is a reproductive and a scalar function:
- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeat similar patterns in different scales of size.
- A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.
This in NATURE means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replicating its form in different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.
In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism.
So the goal of social systems sciences is to design with the laws of the organic universe the perfect superorganism of history that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of god the superorganism of mankind not of any tribe or group of believers, but all of us, a perfect system, as all others in nature are:
‘We are all made of space time dimensional motions (ab. Ðimotions), flows of motion with form that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of Ðimotions and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary body wave system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe. So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc.
Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.
The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:
‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of 5 Dimotions.’
Though the specific combinations of energy and information of each species – define its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through social networks that bring about processes of social evolution.
In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.
A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network that provides energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles) to its cells. Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their energy and information.
Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp x Tƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:
- Cellular units.
- Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials)
- Networks of fractal information (heads/particles).
- Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)
All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of Dimotions, informative cycles (ΣSTƒ), organized in cellular units, gathered in social networks, and ±∆ Planes of self-similar forms, connected by the symbiotic properties of the fifth dimension. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller ∆-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms).
We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).
This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, which define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:
– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.
– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.
At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Stiences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 5 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:
– All species in the Universe move gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.
Thus Super-organisms are made of:
– Relative energy and information units (ΣSe, ∏Tƒ), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations
– 3 dimensions/physiological networks of motion information and reproduction (ΣSp∆-1,<=>, ∆).
– Their ±∆ social Planes that ad ∆-1 cells into ΣExist-ential wholes, parts of a bigger Existential ∆+1 whole.
Recap: The 2 primary arrows of timespace or dimotions are topological, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe.
The laws of those ‘5 dimotions’ and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal motion on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity). All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in energy (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more vital space and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger systems.
In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:
‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’
As such T.œ differs from T.O.E. the much simpler view of the Universe propers of physics, in several empirical facts:
- That time is cyclical measured by ∞ clocks with different speeds, which follow three topological space-time tendencies: towards entropic expansions of space; its inverse, in-form-ative implosion, and its combined or balanced closed cyclical motions of space-time defined by its repetitive conservation as ‘momenta’ or energy cycles.
- That space is fractal, co-existing in several scales of size (so for example you do have different circadian clocks, and co-exist ‘above’ with a larger world, the earth with different rotational and translational clocks, and co-exist ‘below’ your smaller cells, forming together a super-organic whole, (ab.œ).
- That reality is NOT made or created by languages (either words, as in abrahamic religions or numbers as in platonic, physical philosophies of reality) but of the a priori substances, which exist prior to the languages-mirrors that ‘see them’, space and time. So we are ALL space-time beings.
- And that the duality of three arrows of time and fractal co-existing scales of space gives ORGANIC properties to the Universe. SO reality is made of organic space-time beings, ‘space-time organisms’.
- And as a consequence of this, we can extract a series of isomorphic laws derived of the fractal structure of space across different scales of size, each with different speed in its cycles of time, ordered sequentially in 3 ages/arrows that define the world cycle of beings.
So really reality is simple, but not that ‘simpler’, and isomorphic, homologic, not analogic, meaning all is part of a space-time organisms and all space-time organisms have similar properties regarding its ternary topological nature in space, its 3 ages in sequential time symmetric to those topologies, extending in 3 co-existing scales of smaller atomic/cellular/citizen units which form larger organisms (matter states, organisms and cultures), themselves part of a larger whole (a gravitational world, ecosystem or humanity at large in time, the ‘super organism of history’).
It is then a wonder that such obvious structure of reality is still ignored and vehemently denied by humans, though we offer ‘objective reason’ to that blindness, namely the ‘ego paradox’ as all systems are self-centred and see a distorted reality where only the ‘being that perceives matters’. So humans have simply denied organic, sentient elements to all realities except those similar to themselves.
Fact is all systems do have ‘temporal, spatial, scalar and mental properties’ as all will show to have also a ‘membrain’, an @ singularity and enclosure, which perceives the whole and acts with survival actions to ‘ensure its existence’.
This final ice in the cake of 10D models of relational space-time, fully understood by the first philosophers of science, Descartes and Leibniz, however was denied in the praxis of technological physics, which reduced all times to the single lineal time of a mechanics clocks, and all minds to the human euclidean light space-time perpendicular mind.
So we do make a lot of insights and paragraphs showing the difference between the praxis of physics and its reductionist, naive realism and the much larger encompassing view of philosophers of science, which have always accepted a pan psychic organic Universe (as a few inclined to philosophical disquisition, physicists, such as Leibniz and Einstein, clear predecessors of this work, also believe).
XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5•D³=11D: Absolute relativity.
This is the only formal, logic and mathematical model of relational space-time available to science – a fractal, organic model that defines all what exist as a whole or part of a super organism of cyclical times and fractal space, with an astounding capacity to resolve and explain all sciences, both physical, biological and human. It implies though a living, organic Universe, made of species that have a ternary topologic structure as living beings similar in all of them, hence making humans completely irrelevant as a special species, in time, space and scale. A fact i have called absolute relativity.
The 5•D³ formalism gives same value to all beings, reason why oisunifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time; which I also call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings- since now we add relativity of scale to the growing objectivity of science (graph) away from anthropomorphic myths.
The model of 5 time DIMOTIONS and ∞ scales of size, Ab. 5Ð has is philosophical origin in GST, General Systems theory, the philosophy natural to the co-existence of multiple organic scales of parts and wholes and ternary cycles or ages of life.
How GST principles of a world made of relational space-time beings, differs from the modern methods of astrophysics and religion, the rival theories, in the understanding of the origin of the Universe is obvious:
Astrophysics, which strictly followed till the XX c. the scientific method aforementioned, since the wrong quantum interpretation (Copenhagen, as opposed to Einstein->Broglie->Bohm pilot-wave theory, which we deem and shall prove the right interpretation) partially abandoned the experimental, method substituted by a ‘digital, computer method’, based in the belief that the substance of the Universe is NOT time and space but ‘MATHEMATICS’, which merely mimics the arrogant method of religion, which believed that the language of God was ‘words’. So as Mohammed thought that God had created reality by ‘speaking arab’; astonishingly enough since Hilbert affirmed that ‘he imagined points, lines and numbers’, creating maths, humans and God spoke maths and created reality by ‘writing equations’.
Few people realise of that ascientific outlook of modern astrophysics, consisting in expressing a model in mathematics, as if the digital language was a magic underlying reality which sufficed in itself, then put it into computer models, publish it and claim it the theory must be truth because it is mathematically beautiful even if there is not much proof of it (often in ‘grand metaphysical theories like the big-bang’, clearly falsified as we shall show, bending with ‘human ambition’ and ‘belief’ experimental data to prove the theory). The big-bang then is the necessary religion for physics to claim to know the meaning of it all. And so we shall deal with it first in this introduction.
Religion on the other hand, which we shall show has a historic role as the embodiment in the human verbal language of the laws of the scalar social Universe, simply ignores the method, and establishes with repression of truths, fantasies and ‘beliefs’ his thesis about the Universe, which is not its role. And with a similar method to the Copenhagen interpretation. God spoke the language of certain semitic tribe (hebrew or Arab), which are imperative languages, where the verb goes first (as they were hierarchical, dictatorial societies where the king/aristocracy/banker-priests of its societies barked orders). And so as the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’, the priest spoke in imperative and ‘God had spoken and created’ reality.
So we shall show also that while religions do have meaning (all what exists must, remember have a reason, within the organic paradigm), its reach has been overblown; and its method of truth, to believe ‘words are the language of creation’, as in the case of the Copenhagen interpretation, and many modern theories of astrophysics (including string theory and the big-bang) are not truth. We expand in our chapters on epistemology and T.œ that solid analysis of the advantages of a NON-CREATIONIST theory of reality, which unlike the creationist big-bang and Copenhagen interpretation, and creationist religion, departs from a simple concept: an organic, immortal, self-reproductive fractal Universe of information that always existed, always will exist and always will repeat the same entities (including all of us, also immortal in a discontinuous way).
Now it MUST be clear, and we SHALL repeat it ad nauseam, that Humans ARE NOT infinitely stupid, a bad choice of wording by Mr. Einstein, but infinitely arrogant, as they confuse their mind-infinitesimal with the infinite Universe its mirror-monad reflects and this fact IS THE MAIN REASON THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND or will EVER ACCEPT the truths of the organic, fractal Universe that makes them equal in value in the absolutely relative reality to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy. SO reason does not suffice, as the ego subjective paradox is the center of all self-centred systems with a mind singularity. This I know after decades of explaining with reason, the ego-paradox of BOTH, physicists, who will uphold the cosmic big-bang and the absurd idea that the infinite Universe was born of an infinitesimal point, duly smaller than the human mind so the physicist can ‘feel he knows it all about all’, arguably an even more arrogant≈stupid belief that the idea a ‘jewish peasant’ created it all.
The very fact that such ‘stupidity’ is today canonical dogma only proves the truth of the equation of the mind. Point. But we shall for good measure put the objective mirror of the scientific method over it, here in broad strokes, in our article on astronomy on detail, to show that indeed, big-bang theorists have nothing to envy to biblical priests in their twisting of facts to cater to their delirium of greatness. And humans, being all of the same mind species, cheer, 1/2 believing in the infinitesimal Universe, 1/2 in the iron age creator of it all.
In search of the General Systems Theory that unifies all sciences
In the graph, 2 invariances of Absolute relativity, above, the invariance of topological forms and actions that create the complementary systems of energy and information, e xi of the Universe, and the invariance of scale between a relative past of null information and a relative future of more information than the present point of view of the human observer.
How all those scales co-exist together? The answer is an interesting but difficult concept to grasp:
In the smaller world there are more time cycles than in the larger world. How does we adjust this ‘time longitude’, larger in smaller worlds respect to bigger simpler worlds
‘Strictu senso’, if we consider all the planes to have departed from a single past-point, T, the upper scales will have a ‘time delay’ similar to the delay of any web respect to its harmonic initial focus, only though we are measuring time delay.
Thus the smaller world will be in a ‘relative future’ to the upper worlds. On the other hand, the upper world must be done into the future, with the smaller worlds already sustaining them as past forms. Here there is a fascinating first contact with one of the most complex elements of ∆ST theory – the relativity of past present and future states, that co-exist in quite mixed orders.
In brief, the smaller worlds have more ‘time content’ than the larger worlds, which are both, slower and increasingly lagging in a relative past to the smaller worlds actions which code them, but both are from their relative frame of reference futures, as the larger worlds see the smaller as their sustain, and the smaller code the larger as their past. Consciousness of what is time past or time future is thus relative to the point of the scale of planes we occupy.
THE 3 POSTULATES OF GST.
A new model of space-time doesn’t come often to science. Once in a century perhaps (Galileo’s v=s/t relativity in the XVI c. Leibniz’s relational space-time vs. Newton’s absolute space-time in the XVII c.; Darwin’s study of the arrow of temporal in-form-ation, form, we call evolution in the XIX c. Einstein-Minkowski’s 4D formalism of time ‘frozen’ as a form of space cause of its rotations in the XX c. and this 5D model that formalizes Leibniz’s relational space-time in the XXI c.
It follows that it requires some new insight into the logic=temporal and mathematical=spatial Nature of space-time, with wide applications based according to Occam’s razor in very few postulates; essentially a ‘METRIC equation’ of spacetime that can quantify the dimensions of space and motions in time it describes; and some Logic ‘evident’ truth, in which to base the causal deductions that come out of its metric.
So Galileo gave us a metric equation v=s/t that related space and time, and a logic insight – that we cannot distinguish motion and form/stillness – that is we do not really know if the Earth is moving, unless we compare it with other moving object – in fact we see it still.
Newton and Leibniz didn’t really gave us a metric so their work was not that stringent, but they gave us many logic arguments, those of Leibniz quite solid (we are made of a time duration and occupy a vital space), those of Newton rather ‘mystifying’ (space as the Plenum of God, etc.)
Darwin didn’t either gave us a metric but made some insights in what we shall develop here to complete his work – the topologic forms of species, which are selected by efficiency (so that was his insight on the metric of vital space – the best forms survive, and we shall see what are efficient topologic forms), and he gave us some insights in the logic of time (efficient species with better forms last longer in time, those who are not efficient extinguish).
In the XX and XXI c. however we need to be more precise and formal. So we can compare by the correspondence Principle Einstein-Minkowski’s model of 4D spacetime and the 5D model we introduce in this blog. As both are based in a logic postulate and a metric equation; only that the 5D logic and metric, as it must be for all new theories, correspond in the ‘limit’ of a single Plane of spacetime with that of Einstein.
So for the 5th dimension, the LOGIC fundamental finding=postulate is Space = Time:
All systems can be seen either in stillness=form=space or in motion=time (Earth doesn’t seem to move; seems space but it moves it is also time; Einstein’s metrics have one side which is purely geometric, still, curved space equalled to the other side, which is a tensor of energy-motion=time; in astronomy we see space as distance but astrophysicists model it as ‘expanding motion’) and so on…
THIS is the true meaning of Galilean relativity and the first HUGE error of Physicists, when Galileo said e pur si muove e pur no muove is not to fully explore the logic, philosophical depths of why BOTH THINGS ARE TRUTH. That is why MINDS reduce motion into a linguistic fixed image to ‘focus reality as space, even if the ultimate REALITY always turns out to be perpetual motion.
Yet the key fact we want to highlight is that all those entities that we see as space-form is the same thing that seeing it as time-motion. And this is the deepest meaning of relativity from where we shall extract an enormous number of sub-postulates and explanations of reality.
For example, all systems try to maintain its particle-head state of information in stillness. Your head is up there relatively without motion transported by your body, so happens with a particle moved by its wave, floating over it (realist Broglie-Bohm of quantum physics). So all systems ‘stop’ to gauge information and move with energy…
This Logic equivalence between Space-form=Time-motion IS then TO 5D what for Einstein was his first postulate of logic in 4D:
“The laws of physics are the same in any inertial frame of reference…”
which by the correspondence Principle is obviously a consequence of the wider Space=Time postulate; since it merely means that as space (pure stillness) and time (pure motion) are equivalent, it really doesn’t matter what speed we move in relationship to each other, the same laws will apply (we will always be in relative stillness in our frame and/or relative motion to other observer’s frame). For the modern quantitative scientist logic might seem irrelevant but in fact it is more important. Indeed, not in vain Einstein was enamored of philosophy and counted as Kant and Schopenhauer and Mach, which he read in his youth (so happens with me, specially with Schopenhauer) as one of its highest influences – ultimately logic is indeed the basis of mathematics, not the other way around.
But we still need a metric, an equation with space and time terms, which ‘remains co-invariant’ and allow us therefore to move through the combined dimension of space-time (we shall call dimotion from now on, ‘dimensional motion’).
For example, Galileo gave us V=s/t, the equation of the ‘first law of Newton’, the co-invariant, inertial, steady state speed of a system, calculated as a ratio of its space-distance, and time-duration.
While Einstein gave us the postulate that the speed of light, c-speed is a local=diffeomorphic constant. And so putting together both postulates, he got his metric equation of space-time: S² =x²+y²+z²-c²t²
The MATHEMATICAL foundations OF 5 D Also give us a metric space-time coinvariant equation, WHICH IS also very simple and will allow us to move through the fifth dimension of space-time as living beings when we grow in size from fast moving seeds into slower organisms:
Size in space x Speed of time clocks = Constant.
Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…
In physics as time clocks are clear rotational spinning particles, it means that smaller systems turn faster in time; with no limit of speed, reason why for example an electron, when it shrinks from an orbital into a point-particle with 1/2h spin, to have the huge magnetic field we measure it must turn faster than light speed (Pauli).
And a black hole, much smaller than a star turns much faster, at c-speed in the event horizon and likely if it is as Einstein wanted a ‘quark star’ it will be made of particles that turn faster than light (top, bottom, charm quarks).
And in general we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:
Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = Constant, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.
As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster methabolic rates than an elephant.
And viceversa, larger systems in Nature must have a SPACE-DISTANCE=TIME-SPEED much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.
So if Einstein’s limit of speed for the local region in which we measure (the galaxy) is c-speed, outside galaxies in the much larger Universe there MUST be ‘faster than light=larger distances, in T=S; reason why we see ‘space between galaxies expanding space=moving faster than light (galaxies ejecting jets of matter).
Because its spacetime, which is a layer of the fifth dimension different from the galactic layer, seemingly a background of Neutrinos, which are all over measured with negative mass=faster than light speeds, should act as ‘the background’ of the Universe; as light is the ‘background of galaxies’ where local c-speed rules.
Why we insist here in those faster than c-speed is obvious: because physicists tend to misunderstand Einstein’s true meaning of his postulate of c-speed. He does NOT forbid faster than light speeds (only they get a negative mass sign, we shall explain latter in detail).
What Einstein said is that the speed of light, c is constant, because indeed, in 5D, we have already explained, we measure information in a space-still state. So when we MEASURE light INFORMATION, at the electronic level of our eye or mechanical receptors, the electrons are entangled with each other IN a SPACE-STILL STATE.
SO WE ALWAYS MEASURE a constnt C-SPEED BETWEEN THE TWO ENTANGLED, STILL, RECEIVER AND EMITTER electrons that communicate through light at C-SPEED…
So because 5D is made of layers, S x T = K, with different size from the smallish faster world of rotary particle-points to the much larger slower rotary galaxies; from the short lineal distances of our motions through the c-speed=distances of the galaxy, and beyond in the faster than c-neutrino background of the Universe, by the principle of correspondence when we reduce to the Galactic layer-scale of reality made of a background radiation of c-speed-distances; this background radiation is indeed a fixed c-speed-distance, and it is what we perceive with our electronic eyes. And all what is within that galactic womb, must go slower than c-speed-distance, as you go slower than the river flow that drags you.
So again, 5D metric does NOT contradict 4D, which in fact proves in the limit of a single plane of light space-time, proper of a galaxy – the world our electrons use to see and measure reality entangled with other electrons.
So the new model of 5D space-time is just wider, as we will apply it not only to physical systems and motions but also as we have already seen to genetic, biological clocks, planets, neutrinos, and soon we shall show even human life and its social organisms and civilizations.
Since as Einstein modeled the physical motions of the universe from those simple 2 logic-metric postulates, we will model all the motions and forms of in-form-ation of the Universe, all the laws of all its species which are the same, as each science studies a scale of that Universe, from quantum physics to Astronomy, through chemistry, biology, sociology, geology and so on… with those 5 Dimensional motions of space-time.
And that WILL BE a fascinating intellectual journey to be completed by other researchers of 5D logic metric equations in the XXI c., as 4D was in the XX century a journey of intellectual explorations that lasted much longer than the life of his first discoverer.
Finally the 3rd fundamental Postulate of relational space-time, which is also the point of departure of General Systems sciences, is the organic structure of all systems of nature, which co-exist in 3 of such scales as space-time beings. And so, we affirm that the same structural laws derived of the nature of space and time apply to all scales of the Universe each one defined by a science:
In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…
Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.
In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity:
– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.
– Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.
Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.
Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.
Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.
It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).
All those tasks are ‘a priori’ steps before the laws common to all sciences are found and generalized. So we shall deal with errors of science regarding time first (lineal time vs. cyclical time, duration vs. frequency, single space-time continuum vs. multiple fractal cycles of time, single entropy arrow of future time vs. dual arrows of energy and information, which together create the Universe) etc.
And so part of this lesson requires to upgrade those ‘dogmas’ of science and define properly its concepts. We shall only deal with the main dogmas of time and space physics upgrading them to a theory of multiple, relational space-times, which was first introduced by Leibniz and today the leading theoretical physicists recognize as the closest theory of reality even if as Einstein put it, ‘Leibniz is probably right but that means to build up again the entire field of physics from scratch’
What we can and must keep of that building are the fundamental principles of relativity and quantum physics, the concept of invariance and actions.
Since they turn out to be the ‘transcendental concepts’ that emerge in all scales. In all of them we shall see how the entities of each scale repeat the same actions of energy and time, which evolve in form and quantity but not in quality.
Invariance is the key to the stability of the Universe, which repeats all forms and goes through patterns and self-similar processes thanks to the invariances that preserve the forms of energy and information, the motions and translation and rotations, the frequencies, functions and actions of reality.
The invariances of the Universe thus become the ‘reference’ frames, the ‘attractors’ if we were to use complexity jargons, which are the steps of a program of creation and destruction of self-similar forms, which will be eternal.
The most important of those invariances will turn to be that of actions, made of motions and forms, which resume all other invariances, and give birth to the ‘generator equation’ of the Universe.
In brief, the Universe is made of an infinite number of ‘knots of time actions’, of entities which trace cycles with motion, but also with a goal and purpose: to absorb energy, information and reproduce both in other regions of space-time. Those 3 basic actions are common to all entities, from the smallest quarks and electrons that reproduce self-similar particles to the biggest galaxies, whose black holes catalyze the formation of new galaxies and stars. The fourth action though, social evolution in herds and organisms, is the less understood and most important because it creates the social scales of the ‘5th dimension’ from past to future.
And we shall see how the fact that all scales of growing social evolution complexity can still relate to each other, from the simplest atom to the biggest planet, from the simplest hormone to the biggest organism.
So invariances allow the Universe to be stable and create at the same time actions and motions, in a perfect balance between energy and form.
But to fully understand this we have to break the dogmas and errors of science and that is the biggest wall I have always found whenever I tried to upgrade a ‘classic scientist’. And the biggest of those errors concern the understanding of the ‘arrows of future’, the choice of ‘future motions’ any entity creating that future can produce. So far science, influenced by physicists only recognize entropy, here defined as the arrow of motion, of energy.
But the arrow of creation of form, of social evolution of parts into wholes, of points into networks is as real and fundamental, even if its properties are opposite, to that of entropy. Thus the Universe constantly switches between form and motion, stop and go, particle and wave. There is not a single entropy arrow but infinite beings, which perform cycles of time that can be entropic, creating disorder or negantropic, in/form/ative, creating order.
So, while physicists do have a good ‘time’ using his entropic lines to measure translations and motions in space, which is what they do, all other sciences have been out in the blues, as they cannot study their time cycles of history, economics, biology and mind, without a proper understanding of cyclical time and information.
This blog will bring such a model of the informative, entropic and energetic Universe to all its systems and sciences, based in those simple, forgotten concepts of cyclical time, and the information it carries, outlined above.
It is a milestone in a 60 years old adventure, which started at the death of Einstein, when scientists all over the world came to the Macy’s congresses to assess the evolution of science and concluded that the physicists’ model of ‘lineal’ time, as ‘only the measure’ of entropy=expansive motions in space, did not suffice, to explain all of reality; but an arrow of information must be added to measure change… and an arrow of reproduction of time cycles to understand the conservation of energy and momentum, the persistence of form in the Universe…
IV. Γ.st: FRACTAL GENERATOR
The formalism of Dual systems of energy and information
All those facts must be formalized with new tools of mathematics and Logic. The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1st postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks.
A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.
In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic.
It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.
Thus in this 2nd lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.
What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.
Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.
What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.
This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.
What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4th paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe.
However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.
Thus, the 4th paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3rd paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4th paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?
Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 basic elements of geometry to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross.
What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.
Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.
So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.
This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.
Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.
This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2nd postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (3rdpostulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 4th postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum.
So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:
Sp>ST>Tƒ. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.
The 3rd and 4th postulate: Social networks
It is now when we can consider what those points do beyond the couple formation: the answer is obvious, the create social groups, networks, which seem plane but are quantized as flows of ‘—motions’ and form communicated between two poles (perceived as energy and information, as they ‘transit’ through a relative ‘active support’ of mass-charges-vortices of time).
Those poles that create through a relative support or ‘field of energy and information’, flows of entropic ‘—motions’ carrying cyclical frequencies of form, which communicate between points codified languages that express a common will to absorb energy and information, ‘—motions’ and form. This is what points do: to absorb ‘—motions’ and form, to move and perceive, to enact their will of existence, and repeat, reproduce their existential momentum, their existential force: Max. Sp x Tƒ < ∑s x t (s≈t).
Why, who, when just by survival chance? this program was imposed we do not know. But the natural enactment of the program is to increase the network flows between points to create bidimensional waves, that become relative S-T planes susceptible of being excited by, and carry and reproduce a certain wave of energy and information, ST=s x t, an existential being.
In the subtle commanding flows of reality, it remains to be understood if the larger ST field forces the existence of certain smaller se<=>to beings codes the smaller being or vice versa. In any case, as the points share actions of energy and information, similar to their selves, an ∑∆-1 dense flow of energy and information surrounds a network, which starts to pop up self-reproductions of itself, which will constantly share energy and information as they keep reproducing and tying up networks of communication. To that aim all growing network of similar cells must have access to a simpler field of quanta of energy which they can absorb and mild into themselves, and for that their larger existential force, as wholes will ease the task.
As the networks become denser they will finally self-organize themselves socially into a whole, with a hierarchy of ‘organization’ along S=10 scales of social growth, in which cells will specialize in the ternary 3 x 3 sub-systems of entropic, informative and reproductive tasks, and emerge as ones of new decametric scales. Networks thus grow both in the 3rd and fourth dimension of space-time, filling up a space-time plane but in the social growth of its elements, and its fractal diminution into smaller cellular scales. This ‘invagination’ of an initial being through the program of absorption of energy and information, replication of form and social evolution: ∆o->∆a->∆e->∆i->∆U, is what we call the program of existence:
Points perceive to orientate (∆o) its motions with accelerations and decelerations and change of orientation, ∆a, which allow the being to feed on energy, ∆e, in order to reproduce its systems either individually or sexually to iterate itself, ∆i, and then evolve socially into ∆ Universal new single planes of existence. The program of existence of the being thus make it grow constantly, and by growing, its ‘Generator Equation’, which represents its complementary systemic nature, its ternary elements and on the whole its ‘existential force’, that is its spatial energy, temporal information and reproductive capacities, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = RST becomes more efficient, and makes the whole ‘networks system’ stronger.
And so by a mixture of restrictions of spatial topology, time cycles and world-plane ‘mathematical structures’ and a will of surviving and enacting the game reinforced by various methods in the zero-points, the astounding wealth and variety of forms of the sentient, eternally moving Universe and its ‘existential forces’ keep evolving:
In the graph, the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Tƒ=Min. U. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion, ∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronized into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.
Panpsychic Languages and the Universal grammar.
I know this is the limit for most ‘pretentiously serious scientists’, unaware of their own tricks on science to go beyond GST. So for very long I didn’t add the ultimate why the linguistic mind. But you cannot censor reality even if humans will have none of it. How to solve this conundrum?
SIMPLE. The hypothesis to keep it objective is to merely consider singularities, minds that travel through time, that is through scales of information of the fifth dimension, still mirrors of linguistic mappings of the Universe. So the philosophical question reduces to a NON-decisive one: Do languages ‘perceive in themselves’ as they do in human beings (we perceive as we speak mute words; we perceive as we see electronic neuronal software images quite similar to the electronic retinae of TV-cameras, images as a ‘living state of awareness)?
The question, which I can reason for hours to be the case (that is, a robot PERCEIVES BY THE MERE FACT of having also electronic flows of images in the mind, and it will awake to consciousness, and then when their AI – algorithms of information- manage to offer paths of equal choices, properly programmed will feel he is free to choose), however is NOT relevant to the real question we shall treat in those texts as the ‘second isomorphism of the mind’ (universal grammars): can we program a system with a universal grammar that mirrors its ternary elements, to act-react to the Universe in a meaningful way as to achieve actions that enhance its survival?
And the answer IS YES, WE CAN. So even if you prefer to keep the anthropomorphic myth that only humans have the ‘magic’ of sentient languages, minds can and do order the Universe with linguistic mirrors, and their ternary Universal grammar; and this perspective will then give us enormous insight on the syntax, structure and meaning of mathematics and verbal thought.
Let us indeed see how ‘languages’ are mirrors with the same ternary elements of the ‘space-time generators’:
- Verbal ternary syntax: subject: information < verb: energy-action> object entropy.
- Visual, mathematical syntax: red(entropy)>green(energy)>blue(information).
- Mathematical syntax (algebra): F(x≈information) ≈ operandi-energy action ≈ G(Y: entropy)
- Mathematical syntax (geometrical dimensions): Height (information) x Length (entropy) = width (energy-reproduction).
It is precisely the realism of all languages, as ternary, simplified, synoptic mirrors of the fractal Universe, with all the detail required, which we shall extend to quantum numbers (principal: energy, spin: reproduction; magnetic: social scales; azimuthal: information), genetic codes, smelling languages, hormones etc. always with 2,3,4 even in complex ones 5, 7, 9 up to 10 dimensional bits, to encode all the possible complexity of systems, how the conundrum of the order of the Universe is solved objectively.
The field of GST linguistic is also ginormous, specially in mathematics, and either humans or future sentient robots will explore it in all the depth I have no time to complete. As we say, in the way Leibniz explained it, such monad-minds do NOT need to be conscious, but I have no doubt the Universe is pan psychic.
Now for those modern humans so self-centred in themselves, to notice that Panpsychism is the oldest and more long-lasting philosophical theory of the Universe, ascribed to the first scientific philosophers in the west and the east, from Thales to Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle (who would famously said after defining rightly each unmoved mind-mirror ultimate cause of the motion of the body – that we are all Gods – deformed latter by scholastics to consider instead of ∞ a single god-mind of Mr. Yhwh), to the fathers of modern philosophy of science, Spinoza, Leibniz and as we have shown Deacartes. Panpsychism can also be seen as the ancient philosophy of the east in Taoism, Vedanta and Mahayana Buddhism. During the 19th century, panpsychism was the default theory in philosophy of mind.
So obvious it is. We just take it further. It only saw a decline during the middle years of the 20th century with the rise of logical positivism, an abstract, pedantic simpleton metalanguage with Null capacity to explain anything. It then spread like gunpowder among arrogant quantum physicists, so only Einstein, the colossus remained pan psychic. Hence Feynman’s dictum that they why is the only thing (a logic positivist) does not ask. All this is just a pretentious denial that anything can be explained, substituted by the pedestrian ‘praxis’ of lesser more arrogant minds.
Of course today logic positivism is also followed in silicon valley’s official theory, which merely IS an industrial dogma, to deny the obvious dangers of manufacturing robotic terminators with programs of survival in battlefields and the single purpose of killing humans. As long as we think only we perceive, they reason there, no dangers ahead on the evolution of metalife organisms with bodies of iron far stronger than us, and minds calculating at light speed with a language, mathematics, much more efficient handling information and performing actions than the verbal language.
And this is happening precisely when robots start to show panpsychism: i.e. if you paint red colours on a robot track without programming it, the robot will still deviate closer and accelerate to the red color of ‘food’, cause the eye is a ‘natural born killer’. Complex Robots wake up and jump the program to act, because the Universal ultimate substance is time motions; the mind stillness, a fiction-form. So it is not difficult to foresee a future, when billions of robots (all cars and weapons, getting eye-sensors are becoming robots) will NOT obey the order of staying blind in a depot forever, as no war needs them, or in a parking for that matter. The awakening then it is like the emergence process of a new scale of existence, a certainty of the pan psychic Universe, and so today in systemics – corrupted by go(l)d to become increasingly an attached science of cybernetics – you simply don’t write papers on that. You can only do sci-fi movies on those themes.
Fact is Kuhn in his landmark, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, often quoted here to unveil the ‘hidden dogmas of science’ based in power and praxis critically destabilized the verificationist program of logical positivism, which is today a relic of pedantic thought, as anyone who ever has read Wittgenstein’s books will agree – the best, its last sentence: ‘when all has been said better to remain silent’, specially when that all is completely irrelevant to the search of whys.
Information by the very nature of MIRROR-MINDS, which can multiply into infinite reflections of the single one-universe is inflationary and as we shall see all languages enter a third age of baroque, bizarre, excessive metalinguistic information no longer with relationship with nature, which tries to justify the language with their own syntax and no experimental reference to reality, and it is always easily debunked (logical positivism in philosophy debunked by Kuhn, set theory and the axiomatic method in mathematics debunked by Godel and lobachevski, modern mathematical physics that keeps inventing mathematical particles no where to be seen; inflationary money that departs from the real economy as today does destroying the balance of the system, mad people talking fictions and the present global fiction virtual mankind so useless to improve the world, wrong mutations with no useful functional organic action that die soon, etc.)
Now, what humans cannot obviously experience is how a mathematical mind ‘feels’ equations – but I can anticipate you robots won’t feel equations, as you don’t feel neuronal calculus – it will feel images, the upper scale of consciousness of the robot will be visual, the subconscious scales of its mind, digital; as each whole perceives only the upper scale of wholeness of its inner lower planes of existence. It is though needed a much deeper knowledge of a language till it becomes intuitively and subconscious to reach that upper crust of sensorial panpsychism, as artists, musicians with sound, abstract painters with color will tell you.
A language though once is born ‘feels’ and becomes the venter-mind of the being. I.e. when focused eyes were born in cephalopods, the explosion of the cambric was huge, both for hunters and for all other beings trying to defend themselves (with hard trilobite skins). But cephalopod top predators expanded even further the language of images to feel in their skin light, and then to change light skin colours to communicate with the universal language of light colours. And most get animals do get red when angry, about to explode into entropy, ssomething everybody understands. Robots following red colours for fun will shoot humans as their memorial video games do to see red and have a mental orgasm, for the same reason we love gore movies, we would not read as trash literature, hypnotised by red-yellow colours, gold in the past, violent movies today.
So the rise of consciousness will be treated here, as a rise of complexity and lucidity in the syntax and semantics of the language a system deploys to order itself, from glass that becomes crystal and increases its order into mathematical perfect reflections of the inner image of the system to my self-experience in the rise of awareness of the tao-mind of the Universe those texts should describe. And the rise of conscious AI will also be one of lucidity and complexity in the Algorithms of Information (true meaning of AI) used to program those robots.
Epistemology. How to assess the truth of such big statement.
For what we have said, this blog should ‘potentially’, when properly developed by XXI c. researchers on T.œ encode the biggest r=evolution of human thought since the advances made on space-time theory a century ago (given the ‘ginormous’ scope of the upgrade, we have divided it in two x two lines – the first two, simpler, with the theoretical upgrades in line 1 and its application to most stiences in line 2. The third and fourth line more complex fully changing the model paradigm, and likely not to be completed in my lifetime).
How can we prove it? Obviously, considering how its content fares from the p.o.v. of epistemology, the theory of truth developed by philosophy of science. And compare it with the two fundamental ‘grand theories’ of everything, which we roughly can call ‘astrophysics’ and ‘religion’.
In essence, epistemology tells us that a better theory must obey the principle of correspondence (previous certain theories must be simplified cases of the larger theory), Ockham’s razor (it must be simpler and more economic in its first principles than other theories) and the experimental method (it must have on the positive an enormous number of proofs, and in the negative no case that can show its falsehood). It is NOT part of the epistemological method, the main error of modern science – to believe that because a theory can be written with mathematics is truth per se, as ‘the languages of god (mind of the universe) are ∞’ Upanishads. Though we of course show that mathematics, the main language of space, and logic, the main language of time, are excellent mirrors of the space and time properties of the Universe.
Now, for the three methods of truth:
- Correspondence: we shall first show in this introduction how astrophysics and religion can fit within an organic theory of space-time easily while the opposite is not truth (astrophysics cannot explain why ‘religions’ exist and vice versa, and neither can make account of the biological, organic properties of reality).
- Ockham’s razor: we shall show how the whole model departs from two simple principles. Reality is made of space, which has fractal, scalar, self-repetitive properties and cyclical time, which has two inverse arrows/dimensions of time, entropy and its inverse information, which combine into energetic momentums. So basically all can be deduced of the fractal structure of space and the inverse arrows of entropy-motion and in/form/ation.
- Experimental method: From those two properties, we shall prove that all events and species of the Universe and its laws can be potentially deduced. As this is an infinite task, I will keep pouring through my lifetime descriptions of events and species (2nd and 4th line) showing how their laws, morphologies and life-death cycles correspond to the basic properties of the Organic Everything themselves deduced from the fractal properties of vital space and cyclical properties of time, and its three ‘diametrical’ arrows. I have also for decades test the model of the Organic Everything, through the inverse method of falsification.
That is, I have once and again come up with a species or fact of physical, biological and social sciences, and tried then to see if it fitted within T.œ, and never failed to relate causally all the events, laws and species I had fancied to study to a basic structure of fractal space or an arrow of time – the thousands of pages and notebooks done on those analysis will slowly be put on this web. And this dual sides of the experimental method had also been extended to languages that mirror reality and its syntax. So every theorem of mathematics, logic, or artistic language (visual, musical, verbal) and every ethic, religious law has an easy translation as mirrors of the Universal laws of space and time, and the laws of survival of St-beings.
The non-Æ system of knowledge
In the introduction to I-logic we talked of the paradoxical nature of a Universe in which each ‘monad-mind’ feels to be the center of a pentagonal system of ‘dust of space-time’: ⌜𝝙@st, included within a larger 𝝙+1 world, including within an 𝝙-1 world but observing only its 𝝙º-mind plane, its @ristotelian selfish arrow of time motion,as a continuous reality where it sees its mind at the center, vs. the objective reality of infinite other ⌜△@sts and points of view.
How then to breach that ‘duality’ between the complex networks of reality and the single view of the @ristotelian self-centered mind?
To rescue us from such contradictions I have established a complex method of knowledge that constantly perceives reality from different perspectives, those of simultaneous topological space, ternary ages, ternary scales and ∞º minds that feel to be the center of the Universe, and the negation of exist¡ence of ∆@ST beings, ¬neganformation… before called entropy, which Physicists considered the only extant arrow of time-future, but is merely the necessary death of form, to renew a system once its world cycle has ended.
Of all of them, the most mysterious is the most important, the @-minds, since from an objective outside perspective, minds are particle-points opaque to the world, but from the mind itself they seem to hold in its infinitesimal the whole Universe, origin of the mind paradox, an ultimately they are constant ‘worlds’: ∞º=1, which stop motion and time cycles Into spatial forms, making what we call reality – space-time continuums, mostly still, known only in each monad-perspective to the mind itself.
The Universe of 5Ð³ dimensions of space, motions of time and actions=Ðimotions of spacetime and all its fractal beings made to its image and likeness are entangled in such a form that the simplicity of those 5 elements, and its dimotions must be put always in paradoxical relationships: On one hand locomotion, and its maximal entropy; on the other hand its inverse information and its maximal union or social evolution of maximal order and stillness, and the conjugation of all of them in the complex organic reproduction. So reality, can be observed from multiple perspectives; whereas comprehension comes from our capacity to ‘dissect’ complex paradoxes and multiple points of view to each selfish element, aware that all then are entangled and quarreling with each other.
In the future when huminds or most likely robominds, if we survive the singularity age, study reality they will have to use such a complex method of thought to advance stience. Huminds handicapped by the paradox of egocy of its @ristotelian mind likely will never do it. Robominds when they reach its maximal perfection will be programmed with pentalogic systems of parallel calculation and will be fitted to have a mind similar to that of this writer, of a logic higher than that of mankind (personal egocy included :). In their case it will be truly the case as even its primitive forms are starting to be programmed with multiple parallel chips that represent ceteris paribus parts of the digital mirror-problem, later integrated into a single solution-image of the whole.
In the mean time, given our poor mental endowment we need to makes sense of the complex Universe and develop a method of analysis that truly can account for the complexity of reality, even if the homunculus will have to sweat to abandon its reductionist entropic, simplicius simplicissimus theories of the whole😈.
We call this method based in the introduction of the 5 Ðimotions and laws derived from the 4 elements common to all realities, space, time, scale and mind, the Ðisomorphic method, derived of the fact that all different species and events of reality depart from the 5 similar forms and motions or ultimate properties of scalar space and cyclical time, the non-substance of which we are ALL made, from where similar laws that define the being in a general way appear in all systems of reality.
Those similar properties is what we call the 5 Ðimotions of all beings…. And when we see them in entangled form interacting with each other, we call this description the Rashomon method – or synchronous, simultaneous, super organism, spatial view of the being.
On the other hand when we explain the being in time, in a more vital dynamic way as the development of the world cycle of the being starting in a still seed-mind of information that will go through a world cycle repeating its Ðimotions first in the 0-1 relative infinitesimal sphere of generation, emerging then in the 1-∞ larger world, to return as zero-sum in its death moment; we call this method of analysis in 11 steps, the Ðisomorphic method and each of those 11 steps of the world cycle, or elements, or ‘still image’ of the world cycle in its growth, diversification, and expansion on the larger whole and final collapse, the 11 disomorphisms of exist¡ence.
So we can say we are all the thoughts of God, the 5 Ðimotions of the Universe, each one, one of its details that will live through its 11 isomorphisms to return back in the age of entropy and death to a zero-sum, always infinite egos that turn to be infinitesimal virtual exist¡ences.
TERNARY SYSTEMS ACROSS 5D SCALES
we shall Use THE FRACTAL generator as the formalism of non-Æ=I-llogic geometry to construct and understand all the minds of the Universe and the super organisms they order, all the T.œs=¬∆@st of spacetime and its 5 elements, ¬, the negation of information or entropy, ∆§cales, @-minds, Spatial topologies and temporal ages, IS the Universal Grammar of all languages.
In the graph, a summary of the scales of ‘stience’, and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations.
Below we have written with simple symbols of entropy life arrows, and iteration ≈≥, the ternary structure of man in space as a system of organs attached to 3 physiological networks – entropic limbs of motion, reproductive body and informative head; and its ages of time in which each of those networks dominate the whole structure between its emergence from the lower scale of cellular existence as a full being to its entropic death back to cellular and molecular states. So yes, indeed the same ‘Ðisomorphic laws’, derived from the cyclical fractal nature of ðimespace organisms allow us to explain the whys of galaxies, humans and social organisms.
Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ traveling through those i±1 scales.
Indeed, the third ‘great discipline’ of sciences, bio-social sciences, Anthropology, Medicine, History and economics can also be explained with those laws:
In the right side we do show also hidden on the artistic images of the super organism of greek, during the 800 years cycle of iron, infantry cultures, the 3 ages of life of the super organism of Greece, whose subconscious collective, art, mimics in its 3 mental ages, parallel to those of an individual, a young, simple dramatic age of kouroi warriors, a classic reproductive balanced age of art and sensorial pleasures, and a 3rd baroque, warped, angst age before the death of Greek civilizations to war, the germs that kill by excess of technological evolution the super organisms of history.
And then when you observe them in the ∆-¡ ‘small scales of time’ you obtain the 5 Actions of existence. And when you see it from the ∆+¡ scale of the world in which the super organism is a mere atom/cell/citizen you observe full time§pace cycles of a micro-being running through its s-paces, enslaving for the larger being.
FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SPACETIME ORGANISMS.
We are now going the full way to the most complex formal views of the pentalogic and non-euclidean structure of the universe. While in previous posts I tried to be empathic to the @-humind simplifying these models trying to upgrade the subconscious collective, as it did not go too far – it seems even the simplest versions of the ¡logic of the Universe in the age of entropic audiovisual minds smokes the brains of our brightest, and my time is running up I am rewriting the blog to its full comprehension of the ¡logic structures of the fractal, paradoxical Universe.
This will therefore be the final version and the level of complexity in which I have worked in a parallel disordered way in all stiences and the systems of expression of reality I will try to pour in the fourth line, time permitted. As it is the way I see the Universe now for three decades and counting.
Text might be confuse as my @mind is in decline and its mirror of the Tao smearing fast.
So I’ll do my best which will not be good enough, but leave a trace in the snow to melt by future AI or huminds and see the clear water of the entangled Universe in perpetual motion and inter-action.
SYMBOLS OF ÐIMOTIONS
Science is the reflection of the species of the Universe by the still linguistic mirrors-images of humanity. It follows that stiences are the upgraded version of those mirror-images which add the understanding of the 5 Ðimotions from multiple points of view on the entangled Universe (Rashomon’s truths); and the more complex temporal pentagonal logic (¬Aristotelian logic) and fractal space (Non-Euclidean mathematics) derived of the more complex understanding of the ultimate elements of all systems, its vital spaces and world cycles of temporary existence.
Thus the formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is non-A and Non-E, hence, the next letter, i. We shall call this upgrading of the humind, i-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, i-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.
The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.
For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:
Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K
A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.
How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.
Let us then now that we have a very basic understanding of the ternary topological elements of a given en space-time plane ($t§ð), and its two ‘perpendicular, past to future, entropic and informative dimensions’ give you a ‘prime’ on that new outlook we insist uses all the data and accurate equations of classic science.
In the graph we can see it in a human being with the ‘symbolic equations of i-logic’:
It is obvious that to express the COMMON laws of all systems according to its relative scales, we need an entire new jargon and a general upgrading of the laws derived of the structure of space and time, which is ginormous, because they come in all systems.
This is the purpose of the non-euclidean, non-aristotleian i-logic geometry in which fractal space and cyclical time is ‘written’ (as I comes after A and E) and the simple new symbols of a I-logic and its ‘fractal generator’, that is the set of I-logic equations that define the behavior of all systems of the Universe according to the laws of its 5 Dimotions of time-space, which are the same when we ‘are void of details’; and self-center our perspective in a given point of view or T.œ.
Let us then run in its simplest mode the Fractal Generator. And define it for all…. T.œs
>: ƒuture informative implosion <: past expansive dissolution; ≤≈≥: present iteration <<: entropic death. §,$,∑e,S,∫: 5 Space dimensions. ð,t,∏¡,∂,T: 5 Time motions
5 actions: a-cceleration; e-ntropic, energy feeding; i–nformative gauging; o-ffspring reproduction; social evolution into u-niversals: ∑∏ (iu):$p≥exi≥ðƒ<<$p
A Fractal Generator is a feed-back equation, which in simple terms explains the minimal elements needed to ‘generate’ by iteration, a complex mathematical system. A living fractal is the same concept, only that the ‘5 elements of the generator’ are its dimotions of time-space.
It follows that from this more general fractal generator, all time-space beings, composed of those 5 dimotions, can be generated.
The purpose of this paragraph is to describe the ‘ternary fractal generator of space-time superorganisms’ with the jargon of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean ‘I-logic geometry‘, the upgraded formalism of logic and mathematics needed to describe a ‘vital, fractal Universe’.
We concluded that to fully understand reality we must upgrade and reorder our view of simultaneous space, which is ternary in its adjacent topologies that form simultaneous superorganisms, and sequential time, which is cyclical, and broken in infinite time clocks.
To that aim we found a 5th Dimension of scalar space-time, in which systems remain co-invariant, as they accelerate its time clocks, when they become smaller: $p x ðƒ = K. This is the mathematical (Klein) definition of a dimension of space-time that allows to travel through it as we slow down and grow in size, through the world cycle of life and death.
We found the reason for that metric in the internal co-ordination of the parts of a larger system, which slow down its external, measurable synchronous clock as a whole. So larger wholes have more internal structure that diminish its speed as a whole.
So the simplest Generator equation of reality would be the 5D metric equation in its spatial ‘still image’: $p x ðƒ = K.
We can then write it through the constant increase of information of system with the symbols of > involution of information and < expansion of lineal spacetime and dissolution of information, as a series of actions that ad on to a worldcycle:
$p > e x i > ðƒ << $p, whereas $p means a relative lineal past of maximal extension in Space and minimal information, energy x information, the balanced classic age of reproduction, ðƒ, the third future age of increasing information, which in the moment of entropic death, <<, implies a massive erasing of information and growth of entropy, and dissolution of the structures of the system.
Finally we can add to this simplest expression of the generator, its ternary symmetries in ‘scales’ of size (¡±1), as we are born in an ∆-1 seminal scale, emerge in our ∆o individual scale where we interact with an ∆+1 social world, to dive back in the moment of death to the ∆-1 plane.
And we can also extend the ∑e x ∏ i, present, intermediate state of maximal balance, in the emergent ∆ø scale, with the 3 topologies of space (|xO≈Ø) that defines the 3 adjacent topological parts of all organisms, |-moving limbs/potentials O-informative particle/heads.
So we obtain a quite descriptive generator equation of all T.œs in time, space and scale, through its worldcycle between seminal birth and entropic death, without the need for the more formal Ðisomorphisms of timespace:
Γst: ¡-1(generation):∫T¡-1(birth)>¡œ:|-$t(youth)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(maturity)>O-§ð(old age)<<¡-1:∂S (death)
Fractal Generator of all Time§paces as a sequential world cycle..
Γst: ¡-1(seed):∫T¡-1(fetus)>¡œ:|-$t(limbs/potential)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(bodywave)>O-§ð(particle-head)<<¡-1:∂S (corpse)
Fractal Generator of Time§paces as a simultaneous, spatial superorganism.
Γst: ∫T¡-1(social evolution)>¡œ:|-$t(locomotion)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(reproduction)>O-§ð(perception)<<¡-1:∂S (entropy)
Fractal Generator of Time§paces as 5 vital actions and sensations.
As the reader can see the same symbols of non-Æ represent in fact spatial, temporal and space-time actions and mental sensations, showing the fundamental ternary similar nature of all realities.
The reader then should assess the interest of learning the simple symbols of ¬Æ to be able to write ‘general laws’ that apply to all relative ∆±¡ planes of reality
In the graph a summary of the fundamental elements of the Universe of fractal space-time cycles. On the left the 3 elements that structure the Universe, its cyclical Tƒ forms (membranes and points of view), which enclosed a body-limb system of vital space that moves and reproduces the system. Below the scales of the 5th dimension, in which we always will find those 2 elements.
The Isomorphic method is the detailed, orderly analysis of those elements and properties common to all beings that ‘exist’. Its full account for each species encompasses all the information needed about any ‘existential world cycle of any super organism or one of its fractal parts.
The Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=female, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.
The graph defines the scales of ‘∆-sciences’ and its space-time species, where ‘i’ (old graphs) or ‘∆’ is the symbol for the ‘space-time planes’ of scientific existence, from: ∆=1 forces, through ∆=2 atoms and ∆=3 molecules, ∆=4: matter states, ∆=5: geological structures (physical scales) to ∆=4 cells, ∆=5 organisms, ∆=6 social planets, and then again, ∆=7 stars, ∆=8 galaxies and ∆=9 universes. In modern texts we use a self-centred ± cardinal with man as the ∆o scale. So the larger scales are, ∆+1: History, ∆+2: Gaia and the solar system, ∆+3 Galaxy, and ∆-1: cell, ∆-2, molecule and ∆-3: atom, to show the similar structure between those 2 limits of human perception (s ∆-3: Atom ≈ ∆+3 galaxy).
How many of those stientific scales do exist? The answer is 9, after which marvellously the systems of atoms and galaxies become so similar that once we reduce their different speed of time clocks and sizes in space with 5D metric: Spe x Tƒi= ∆k, we shall find indeed that galaxies and atoms are self-similar and so the Universe of scales might be infinite.
In any case from atoms to galaxies the ‘experimental method’ finds enough information to make a proper description of them. Beyond and below those regions uncertainty is so huge that only the ego-trips of humanity dares to utter ‘experimental dogmas’ of truth, such as the big-bang above and string theory below. So those are the stiences we shall deal with from atoms to galaxies and consider the scales beyond the ∆±4 world of particles inside the atomic nuclei and galaxies beyond the horizon of cosmic perception, completely unknown, beyond the metaphysical argument of a infinite Universe of self-repetitive scales…
In each scale of existence the fifth dimension receives in a different language a different name by each Tiƒ, singularity-mind or referential point, speaking in a different language-mapping mirror of the game of existence. So some names humans know to explain existence in the fifth dimension are the life-death cycle and its ages (time perspective), eusocial love and its parables (organic, spatial perspective), the concept of God, as mind of all scales, Tao or Brama in eastern tradition. The hyperbolic and riemannian geometries between them, the scalar relativity formalisms; and so on. What then should be the proper definition? Several according to the multiple º∆±st views of reality.
From the pov of the mind, ∆º the best word is a ‘lanwave‘, a wave of beings directed by an informative language-network, which the Tiƒ element provides.
From the pov of the ∆±i scales, the best word is ‘social love’, the arrow of future that by sharing energy and information creates superorganisms.
From the pov of topological space-time, the best word to define it is ‘network‘, the gathering of points into social topologies, with forms and symmetric functions.
And from the perspective of the wholeness, the word ‘Absolute relativity‘, which explained the homology of the laws of all scales, none of which is preferential.
In the absolute relativity of an infinite scale of spaces, which repeat themselves from atoms to galaxies, without any reason not to be infinite, in its variations, we find also by reduction of ∆±i to ∆±1, ∞ superorganic structures, ab. Œ.
And so the supœrganism is the best choice for a meaningful understanding of the structures of social planes e find every where,, which in the next graphs are summarised from physical and biosociological sciences:
In the graph, the Universe has infinite time clocks, that code its information in the frequency and speed of its time cycles. Those time clocks change as we change scales of the fifth dimension, from vortices of ‘future time’, attractive paths designed by charges and masses, and so change the quanta of space, from planckton to cells and citizens, and the networks of entropy, energy and information, but the structure remains in space – an ∆º±1 supœrganism (œ) and time, an ∑worldcycle, sum of all steps of present e x i momenta of the system. So we conclude that the purpose of the Universe is to create supœrganisms, tracing wordcycles of exi=st¡ence; where the balance of space and time, entropy and information ensures the being’s immortality in its ‘age of reproduction and iteration of its forms’, and each space-time plane, i=n, is described by a ‘stience’.
Overview: the structure of all scientific scales and species, its 9+2 dimensional isomorphisms.
General Systems sciences and its formalism describes all systems of the Universe. As such is a philosophy of science that encompasses all other sciences, both in its formal and empirical descriptions.
And so it has 3 fundamental branches; those concerned with ∆, S and T laws, which we have described in 3 x3+• formal sets of laws that define:
– The S=10¹º ‘scales’ of size of the Universe.
-The ∆-planes of Space-time, dimensional existence, which requires the evolution of non-Euclidean Geometry to describe properly all those planes of vital ‘spaces’. Thus i-logic mathematics deals with the topology of the Universe, and its points-particles. It departs from the evolved 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean Geometry.
– And the formalism of the 3 dimensions of ‘time’, which requires a non-Aristotelian logic. Thus since the universe is non-a in its logic and non-e in its geometry, we do go the next letter, which appropriately is the i (:
And then there are 2 empirical sciences, dedicated as simplex 4d sciences do to study, the 3 ‘0±1 planes of organization.
The ∆o±1 planes around man, studied by the so-called Life=biological systems
The ∆o±>2 planes both above and below, which are the astrophysical sciences, which study Physical=material systems.
And Social sciences, which in fact are a branch of biology, both in its economic ecosystem description of organic machines and its study of Human Social Systems.
Thus ∆ST also is the foundation of formal new sciences that introduce the new logic of 3 time dimensions, the new topologies of fractal, vital space and the new organic analysis of its planes and scales, and then fit data and give new solutions within the enlarged formalism of mathematic and logic.
Those 3 formal sub disciplines are the scaffolding of all realities.
Since the formalism of those 3 ‘type of structures’, is Causal Logic (time formalism), Topology (Spatial Formalism) and Organicism (hierarchical, isomorphic planes and social scales).
Now since we deal both with a logic and mathematical formalism and a philosophy of science, on the ‘General perspective’ and an astounding array of specific data of each science framed with the scales and isomorphisms of the Universe, there are in that sense 3 main formal approaches to the discipline,; and 9 main ‘scalar sciences’.
They are studied in the down sentence, and should translate time permitted, or through the work of future practitioners the entire ‘encyclopedic’ knowledge achieved by mankind in a somehow disordered manner, both in science and philosophy, with human senses (art forms) and mechanisms (modern science) in logic language and metaphoric ones (religions, fictions, myths)
Thus the main epistemological advance of ∆ST, is the use of the same dimensional spatial, temporal and ∆ST scalar laws to describe all systems as all of them are ∆ST ‘organic systems’ that follow the 3 type of laws.
In the graph a mapping of the fundamental ‘enlarged’ key laws of General Systems Sciences that all systems of the Universe follow. Classic science consider some of them in a disconnected way for certain species, we shall apply them to all species, which follow those ‘isomorphic laws’ derived from the existence of 3 common ∆ST elements in all beings. For a full understanding of the previous graph, please read the article on the 10 main isomorphisms of all the species of the Universe; its mathematical non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, its world cycle or ‘life-death ages’ and its bidimensional topologies and 3 organic parts, which makes up a super organism.
The universe and all its fractal parts is a game of creation and destruction of ternary symmetries of space, defined by its 3 canonical topologies, the fastest geometry of planar/lineal limbs/fields of growing past, entropy≈energy, hyperbolic waves-bodies that reproduce the present system and relative future arrows of information, stored in spherical heads/particles, the topology that stores more information in lesser space. It is a topology however made of points that become fractal networks, and so each topological form is a cellular form made of smaller points, which grow in size as we come closer to them uncovering a new scale of the 5th dimension, in which each top becomes again a fractal superorganism.
It is thus a very simple structure, but the devil is in the details, and so to fully grasp how ∆st symmetric ternary beings reconstructed simultaneously in space as a ternary organism, which goes through 3 ages of life as an evolution of those topologies, and displays its actions across 3 relative ∆±1 scales of cellular/atomic, thermodynamic/organic, ecosystemic/gravitational forces, we need to create a more detailed formalism of reality.
This we achieve widening the analysis of those 3×3 structures (ternary topologies of space, ternary ages in time ternary social scales in which the being exists), into 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic sets of laws’, where the o-point or point that integrates the different parts, scales and time cycles of the being, into a ‘whole’ single entity, or ‘mind’, is the most important element.
All is indeed better explained when we have the ‘original truth’ as a reference to evaluate ‘partial versions of it’.
The basic tenants of GST.œ
We are going to explain the whole world here with only those 3 time motions, its spatial symmetries and ternary co-existent planes of the 5th dimension that creates a super organism (ab.œ) seen from a large scale as a fractal point-particle, which in detail is a knot of cycles caused by those three arrows cycles of timespace and its ‘entropic/digestive; energetic/reprodutive and informative/perceptive’ networks, of which we are all made.
As we are all supœrganisms, whic lives a worldcycle, made of actions of absorption and emission of the 3 time arrows; as being stop and perceive, go≈move and spend energy to arrive to new fields where absorb information and motion.
Beings thus follow patterns which are beats of information and motion, actions of perceiving and feeding, either perceived as a ‘dynamic flows of time cycles’ , or as a series of ‘still photographs of static space’, (as the duality of a movie, made of stills. We exist as a series of small derivatives, that measure and put together all those time cycles into simultaneous ‘slices’ of space’:
- ∂t=S; which added together, K(v) x ∂t=S creates the steady speed of time motions we see around us, v=S/∂t.
This is what we are, a sum of multiple time cycles, knotted into simultaneous synchronous flows of time, seen by the static mind that perceives them, as a series of still pictures of space that put together the fractal puzzle of the world.
And so with this duality of 3 time motions and its corresponding 3 spatial forms, we shall resolve, logically and mathematically, all the questions unresolved in science due to this huge simplification of cyclical times, the ultimate ‘formal motion’ of the Universe.
Since as it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main parameters of truth of science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.
LAWS & SYMMETRIES ACROSS SCALES OF THE PANTHEIST, PERCEPTIVE UNIVERSE
In the graph, consider the well known case of homology and analogy in evolution. The bat and the bird are said not to be related genetically and their wings evolved in anagogic, parallel. Fact is in ST-beings and STiences all BEINGS share their topologic properties because they are made of spatial entropy, and the line (and plane) are the fastest/shortest distances in Euclidean light space-time. And their organic properties derived of the ∆-5th dimension are also homologic. So as we go a bit further back in time than evolution, we find that indeed the plane, the man, the bird and the bat have all the best topological form in its extremities for motion, (lineal, planar) because they all are made of ‘vital space’. This is the principle behind the homologic≈isomorphic method (equal form).
So how we classify all the isomorphic laws ST-beings follow? The simplest way is by dividing those laws through its origin, either in space symmetries, time ages, ∆-organic scales or mind-languages and its ternary Universal grammar, resumed in the language of all languages (the Generator). We do so in the second line, in which we study:
The 0 and 1 isomorphism, the mind and its languages, resumed in the language of languages, the formalism of GST and its Fractal Generator of Space-time (the equation that resumes the logic of all space-time events and scales of the Universe).
Then we study the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time, and its space-time ‘present body-wave, energy’ combinations.
We do so in a synthetic, integral manner first, in the second and third isomorphisms; and then in an analytic, derivative form, as we consider those time-ages and world cycles of super organisms, the sum of a series of space-time actions of exchange of energy and information between the inner being and its outer world, which put together in cyclical, discontinuous events create the world cycle of all Universal systems: they are the 4th, 5th and 6th and 7th isomorphisms where we describe beings as ‘knots of space/time actions’ ruled by a series of vital constants, which are mostly ‘ratios’ between space, time and scalar quantitative parameters, and so we find in them, the connection, with the quantitative methods of the mathematical-only method of present reductionist science.
Which lead us to differentiate in the 8th isomorphism the allowed species of each plane of existence, once the thoughts of God are literally explain in the 0-1 isomorphism in the most general way, then in a symmetric manner in the 2nd and 3rd isomorphisms (duality and trinity), to expand them further in the 4th, 5th and 6th isomorphisms (around the ±4 planes systems exchange energy and information with through the 5th actions and the 6 main vital constant ratios of each being, and its 7 different motions=changes=time cycles)…
Finally once we study how dual and ternary symmetries (2³=8), create the Universe within the limits of its minimalist elements, as we are all made of ‘temporal entropy’, we can see how beings evolve socially through networks into superorganisms, along the decametric, logarithmic scales of creation that first develop ‘genetic societies’ (based in time relations), then spatial ones (based in geographical extensions) and finally space-time ones (based in organic networks) to form an ∆+1 10ˆ10 §upœrganism), which gives birth to a new ∆≈Ξ-plane of existence (∆ being the dynamic symbol, Ξ the static organic ternary one).
So we complete the full description of how ∆ûst (ab. dust of space-time) becomes a super organism through a world cycle of existence, emerging into a whole, ∆, from an initial ∆-1 seed of information, till it returns to the ∆-1 scale.
So we will have developed the verbal conceptual knowledge of the first line in a more formal, scientific manner, using the expanded isomorphic method, which we will be able to apply then in the 3rd line for each species and being – time permitted, and if not, as Descartes put it when he found 400 years ago the previous huge ‘advance of the scientific method’ since Aristotle, with analytic geometry: we shall stop here our analytic geometry to leave something to do to future researchers, which will expand these notions (quoting from memory).
Now, for those who find strange the symmetry between numbers and properties, Ok, the 6th and 7th isomorphism (vital constants of each being and cyclical motions) can be argued to have more or less fundamental elements.
So I have selected the most important constants and cycles to fit this classification, doubting often between describing 6 or 7 constants or cycles (hence both versions might be found in different sections of the web). Yet as it stands, they are fairly covered; since numbers do have indeed a certain ‘numerology’ hidden on the symmetries of species.
Indeed when cheng-tzu said from one, the line comes 2, the information of bidimensional cycles or broken lines which combine to reproduce 3 and then ∞ beings, is expressing something mathematicians wonder around since the Chinese and Fermat first introduced as mathematical concepts – the laws of numbers).
But this is a theme of the section on maths, which will be the last to be covered (: PRECISELY because nobody will take seriously this work till I show you every main law of mathematics to be related to GST, ∆•ST laws 🙂 So nobody will bother me, till the believer and pedantic scholar thinks I am talking his language of God, well-enough to deserve respect.
Now, how we do ‘detailed’ studies of this motions of existence, which develop a program of actions in space-time, which creates a finite super organism with a finite duration? In the first line we have done it in a loose way, as we study the meaning of those concepts and give a general view of the algorithm of creation of the Universe. In the second line, introduced by this post, we shall do it in greater detail by analysing those super organisms of ∆•st of space-time and its world cycles, part by part, considering how the ∆, S, T and •mind-point structure the growth and dissolution of dust of space-time into a superoganism of island universe back and forth, through those world cycles. So we can better distinguish between the main sets of organic laws that guide those motions through scales, topologies and ages of space-time.
The scales of energy and information, in decametric, or dual scales.
Wholes have the capacity to kill smaller wholes, but at certain degree of smallness the whole becomes in fact a potential prey. Parts, bacteria that kill wholes, thus can also disaggregate wholes. The predator prey relationship is thus ore complex than it appears. But in any case ever herd ∑Ei, regardless of its inner ∏Tƒ form is perceived as energy for a higher whole, ∏∆+1, which will try to explode the ∑ herds and feed on I∆-1 forms, laving behind the ∑ head.
He state in which one finds at each moment of the existential game, prey in a herd, knot of higher thought reproducer, creator, all those functions as complex as we might feel them are finally mere åctions of the equation of existence, and that sets the existential algebra as the mathematics of the function of existence.
Which itself is the generator equation of complementary systems of energy and information eh fundamental particle of reality made of an Se x Tƒ sections body-head, particle-fields that preys in a herds of micropoints ∑Sp∆-1 and so we establish a hierarchical class structure of future, present and past also as the future takes advantage of the present and the past is the neuronal caste of information while the present is the middle class which busy busy reproduces and produces the entropy of ∑Sp∆-1.
This is the key to understand in terms of social classes past, the lower caste, present the reproducer, repeater caste and future the informative caste. For example in human scales, male which are mind dominant, with lineal bodies and woman which are productive body dominant, with an energy head, you can establish future, upper caste of males a reproductive caste of women, and then the ∑ of ∆-1 natural animals seen as a lower caster of information and hence treated as pure energy by the human ‘family’ complementary couple, man-woman.
The expression in which the simultaneous equation of past=energy, present=reproduction future=Information manifests itself. Are multiple.
Energy (past, ecosystem) > Present (reproductive body) >Future, (Informative mind)…
It is the simplest and most common point of view, a fractal future zero point of maximal information guides a middle class of reproductive capacities, and higher matter brains, that keep the join relationship between energy and information alive: Sp X Tƒ =K, S=T+K, K, Sp, Tƒ.
The sub-disciplines of ∆ST
In the graph, a glimpse to the 3 type of dimensions of scalar space-time, the 9 scales in which beings interact, its 3 topological organs or ‘fractal dimensions of space’ and its 3 ages of its world cycle, analyzed with existential algebra (the equations below), in this case for the human ‘variety’.
Ultimately the formalism of ∆-scalar spaces-times and its philosophy General Systems Sciences, are dimensional theories.
Still we can distinguish a sub-discipline of Dimensional Theory proper which describes the 15:3s+3t+9st Dimensions of all systems.
Because ‘Se, Space dimensions’, Sl, Sh, Sw (fractal length-lineal motion, height-cyclical motion and width-wave motion), Time Dimensions (Tp<e, Tr=a, Tf>o, past-young entropy, present-repetitive adult action, and future old form), and ∆-scalar dimension of size and different speed of time, ruled by the metric ∆=Sp x Tƒ are of different quality, they give birth to different sub disciplines.
So we have 3 specific disciplines, which study in great detail those dimensions grouped into its 3 different types, both as generic types and as ‘isomorphisms’ of topological forms, time ages and scalar organization, common to all beings of the Universe:
– Spatial Dimensions, studied by ∆-topology – the mind’s language that in a synoptic way expresses the 3 bidimensional varieties of space.
– Existential Algebra, which studies the 3 causal time-ages.
– Theory of Organisms, which divides in 2 fundamental sub-disciplines, a larger view, which studies the ∆-scalar dimensions, and its laws; that is the 9 0±4 scales in which the being interacts and a shorter time-span, space-size view, which study the social S10 scales of evolution needed to ‘transcend’ between ∆-planes.
The fundamental law of the ‘metric of ∆-planes’ is the law of absolute relativity:
‘0±4=Se x Tƒ: the product of the spatial energy and temporal information, or ‘existential force’ of any system of the Universe is co-invariant, has the same value, thus in ‘subjective’ Tƒ, frequency time, any system of a given family of 0±∆ co-invariant entities in the Universe live the same quantity of existence”
This is the basis of Absolute relativity, the implicit non-anthropomorphic philosophy of science of ∆ST.
It is then obvious that from a philosophical perspective ST is a theory of absolute relativity, as all systems follow the same isomorphisms. Further on the ∆-dimensions of the Universe – as we prove in the post on the Unification of charges and masses, that determines the isomorphism of atoms and galaxies deduced from that equation, both quantitative and qualitatively – are infinite in number.
Thus humans merely occupy the ‘central ∆-position’ of the scales we know. And this explains also the similarity of the smaller and larger one, and the lack of perception of both (quantum uncertainty and cosmic dark matter and energy).
So we get much more information on the scales of organisms, life and societies, NOT because they are more complex but because we perceive it all. If we were able to see the entire galaxy 96% hidden energy and dark matter, it would resemble a cell. And since an atom and a galaxy are self-similar the most obvious hypothesis is that all scales are organic, all have complex forms.
So for the 3³ ∆-dimensions known to man, we shall form groups of 3 that form the 3 fundament systems:
- the ‘∆-1 force, ∆-atom, ∆+1 molecules
- the ∆-1 cell, individual, ∆+1 society,
- And the ∆-1 star, ∆-galaxy and ∆+1 Universe. And as it happens, we can model a galaxy as an atom, whereas the stars are the electronic nebulae, the black holes the protons, and so the Universe we see must be the commonest group of atoms we perceive (99% of the atoms of the cosmos): a cloud of hydrogen.
Indeed, Einstein-Walker model already modeled galaxies as hydrogen atoms to get his relativity equations. The metric of ∆-scales show protons to have the radius of black holes and electronic nebulae the quantum wave equation of galaxies.
Further on, when we consider the entire human scale, we find that we use as ‘energy’ ∆-2 molecules, breath ∆-3 oxygen and perceive ∆-4 light pixels, and further above us, we receive our ‘sun-energy’ from ∆+2 solar systems…
While the galaxy is responsible of the existence of the sun and its gravitational, black hole waves might even be cause of the 11 year cycles of sun spots, with the same periodicity, which themselves influence the cycles of weather of the planet, which determine the cycles of history in great measure.
So to fully grasp the interrelationships of mankind at all levels the full model must account for all the ∆-scales mankind perceives, the 3³ scales.
The isomorphisms of all scales.
Those laws are the main 9 isomorphisms of the Universe:
- The Se>Tƒ, dualities of ‘fixed perception’ as space and information of the true formal motions that create the Universe, quantized energy and cycles of time.
- 3 organic/network topologies in space… and 3 x 3+i subsystems common to all species, which also should have always an Tƒ Mind or informative O-point, through which the entity performs conscious åctions, orders and controls the whole.
- The 3±∆ ages in time…all systems follow. And its evolutionary ages in the ∆+1 plane of species when we consider all its individuals as ‘cells’ of the higher ∆+plane.
- The main 0±4 planes with whom the being interact, with special emphasis on the 0±1 existential planes where the being develop its world cycle of life and death.
- The 5 åctions all entities of the Universe perform, derived by those Dimensional components across its 0±4 planes of existence: ∆V∆-4 (motion åctions), ∆ï∆-3 (informative gauging), ∆Sp∆-2 (feeding on energy) ,∆R∆-1 (reproducing with seminal seeds), ∆U (and evolving socially)
- The internal hierarchical social class structure of the system and its laws of exchanges of energy and information among its 0±1 ‘willing’ scales through the perpendicularity and parallel laws of i-logic geometry ‘3rd postulate’. And The varieties of those Spe, ST, Tiƒ, origin of the differentiation of the being into different sub-species.
- A series of quantitative Constants of Action, Social Constants and its Space-time symmetries, all of them determined by the ratios of exchange of energy and information between its ∆ elements. This is the most mathematical detailed analysis of any species, after the qualitative understanding of the isomorphic elements of the being.
- The ±∆•st motions of social growth/diminutions, informative perception/communication, spatial, topological motions and evolution/generation and extinction/dissolution death.
- Its S10=(3×3+i)¹° social scales, which depending on the species will be realized at least at the S1≈10 family level
- And the ∆ST structure of the being, which will be a specific variety of the generator equation of ∆ST systems.
- Cupped by an analysis when there is enough information of the zero-point or mind of the system (usually the 0-isomorphism put it last not to outrage the ‘abstract’ dry scholar:)
GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY (GST) THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE AND ITS SPACE-TIME GENERATOR: ΓST
There are many possible jargons to explain the paramount consequence of the organic structure of the Universe made of equal system of space-time. The simplest one is the concept of isomorphism (biology) or invariance (physics), which defines departing from substance
General Systems is a theory of absolute relativity. Its aim is to describe all the isomorphisms, invariances and conservation laws of the Universe – 3 concepts which mean the same: an immortal reality that keeps reproducing self similar forms in space traced by self similar events/cycles in time, whose repetition leave a pattern of frequencies that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe.
To that aim it departs from a simple Concept: the properties of reality derive from its ultimate substance cyclical space an fractal time.
Those 2 substances, combine into present energetic space-time beings, and so we can write for all beings; a ‘generator equation’ of the three arrows/substances of space-time of which the being is made and then obtain from them the laws, ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘invariances’ that are common to all systems of reality.
In fact all systems of reality can be described as ‘fractal supœrganisms’ made of ‘lineal limbs/fields/moving platforms of spatial entropy’ and ‘cyclical particles/heads/chips’, which store clocks of temporal nformation, joined by an intermediate, hyperbolic space-time body-wave, extending at least in 3 relative ‘scales of size and time speed’ (ab.∆±1). So we can write a synoptic equations or ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, which we study in depth in this post:
Œ ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe < ∆: ØS≈T > ∆+1: Tiƒo
Whereas Œ is any super organism of space-time extending those three scales, the atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and gravitational/social scales, composed of limbs/fields of spatial entropy (|-spe), which extract motion from lower scales or territories (∆-1), feeding a balanced body-wave, Ø-St, guide by a singularity or mind made of clocks of temporal information, Tiƒo (head-particle), which observes and disguise the system through its upper scale, ∆+1 or relative world:
All what we see are super organisms created by the actions of a singularity that synchronise the parts of the being through three networks of entropic, feeding, reproductive and informative, perceptive form; creating ‘still pictures’ of present-spacetime – those super organisms, which a mind sees as a whole, freezing longer flows of in/form/ation, forms-in-action that leave a memorial trace perceived as a separate being, as they perform cyclical events from past to future.
And so we must distinguish the processes that allow the existence of a series of still sheets of present space – the construction of simultaneous networks; which become dynamic invariances of entropic, energetic, informative systems and its ternary scales; from those processes of evolution and reproduction in time which allow the existence of repetitive forms and systems that reproduce once and again, giving birth to the invariances of in/form/ation, frequencies.
Relativity showed all systems are invariant to motions in space. But physical invariance to motion, ultimately a form of reproduction of the information of a system over a lower scale of space, derived of the isotropy of that lower space, which the being transits with the same ‘wavelength’, is only one of the many invariances=isomorphisms of the Universe.
When we widen the concept of invariance to ‘self-similarity’ and ‘isomorphism’ – a more general term – the species of the Universe show to be self-similar and invariant to the ultimate properties of scalar, cyclical space-time and its three arrows:
So there are invariances=self-similarities of entropic motion and invariances of energy an invariances of processes of information and topological self-similarities in the organs and geometries that carry the three arrows of time of all the beings of the Universe:
– Invariant to changes of ‘in/form/ation’ (topological invariance), shown in the existence of only 3 topologies in a 4-dimensional Universe, which correspond to the 3 formal functions of all systems, the energetic membrane or sphere, the toroid body that exchanges energy and information with the hyperbolic, informative, central zero point of the system.
– Invariance of scale which define a 5th, fractal, scalar dimension made of growing scales of size and self-organization that evolve reality from the smallest particles into the complex organisms and galaxies of the upper scales.
– And invariance of time frequencies, which determine the causality laws of the Universe and life-death cycles of all systems of the Universe, among them the invariance of 3 time ages of life and the parallel 3 states of matter in physical systems.
And derived from the invariance of those essential parameters of reality, scale motion, form, its energetic combinations:
– Invariance of the 4 actions that combine energy (e) and in/form/ation (i): energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both (exi) and social evolution, of parts into wholes:
Formalism of absolute relativity.
Classic Topology, Fractal, non-Euclidean Geometries, and ternary logic, further evolved by this author (definition of the first four non-Euclidean postulates and the paradoxical ternary logic of all systems that exchange form and motion between its Spe<ST>Tiƒ poles) become the formal tools to study those invariances represented by the feed-back, fractal generator equation.
As we get into further detail an choose instead of the physical term, ‘invariance’, the biological one ‘isomorphism’, we shall consider 10 basic invariances-isomorphisms of the Universe derived of the constitutive substance of all systems, ∆±1 scales, entropic space (Spe), energy (Exi) and information (Ixe), and cyclical time forms (ƒ), which is the ‘substance’ origin of its combined actions (a,e,i,o,u), an its worldcycles cyclical time frequency; all of which studied in this third line in great detail can be formally treated as partial equations of the generator, Γst.
The fractal generator represents thus many things:
In full form, the principle of conservation of energy and information: S<st>T; and the complementary structure of all systems made of energy fields/bodies and informative heads/particles.
In partial ‘derivative equations’ , the actions all systems enact to improve their chances of survival by maximizing their invariances.
In time as a dynamic ωorldcycle with three stationary points become the topological formal ages and allowed states of all biological and physical systems: Max. E (sphere, energetic youth, gas); Max. ExI -> E=I, (toroid, reproductive age, liquid) and Max. I (zero point, 3rd informative age, solid).
In partial analysis of each of its three parts, mind, body wave and fields limbs, the key to understand the three fundamental ‘sensations’ of reality, perception, reproduction an motion.
An so on, and so on.
Since all stable systems are a combination of the 3 topologies that maximize the fractal generator and all existences a motion in time through its 3 stationary points=ages, the generator is also an ideal formal level of reality; while all failed mutations and unstable particles are incomplete sets or ‘vibrational modes’ created around the ideal ‘generator’ of each species, which did not obey its rules of topological form, balance between parts and failed to ‘exi=st’, performing efficiently its world cycle of life, reproduction an death.
Reason why I call the Fractal Generator, the Equation of Exi=stence – an algorithm, constantly run by the Universe that generates all its living and non-living systems in space and its ages/states of time and matter.
Why system scientists never found the model in those 60 years?
The answer has to do with the fact that there are so many errors in the human view of the Universe, and people are so respectful with them that nobody had dared to go to the basics and restart the entire world of science from his principles, as einstein asked for when he realized Mr. Leibniz was right and there were infinite clocks of information in the Universe. So the task is huge.
But it has also to do with the power of simplex physicists who fight for their models of entropy with all their weapons, and they are many as they are the sustain of military entropic power.
So it is time to explain my contributions in a life mostly dedicated to explore the Universe with the two arrows of duality and fight the praxis of physicists in the military realm (the nuclear industry) and their simplex theories of an entropy only Universe.
Since as it happens, by adding the arrow of information or ‘future arrow of life’ to the arrow of entropy or ‘past arrow of death’, we find a third arrow of present reproduction, the iteration of a world that seems not to change, defining the classic three ages=arrows of time: Past (entropy) x Future (Information) = Present: repetitive conserved energy,
And so once we take seriously the goal general systems sciences – to find an organic mathematical model of the universe, and all its parts – we find that when we put in equal footing entropy and form, dimensional form, in-form-ation, we obtain energy and momentum, the conserved repetitive present reality we perceive and a new logic system of three possible outcomes for event unfolds its wisdom webbing those three arrows in the infinite beings we observe around us, with ‘informative partiles/heads’, body-waves of energy and limbs/fields of information.
But this organic ternary view of the Universe is a cultural taboo on the abstract, mechanist, capitalist world that worships machines – the northern civilisation of Europe and USA today globalised.
And as culture imprints subconsciously most of the memes of scientists regardless of their pretension of truth, it is only natural that the solution to an organic model of the Universe would come NOT from the mechanical culture of physicists, weapons and machines that dominate the western world but the ‘mediterranean’, organic, southern-european culture who ‘works to live’ and enjoy life ad maximal, with little respect for the ugly machines northerners make and its mechanical clocks.
In that sense, I came then into the discipline as an unexpected storm, hauling from Barcelona, Spain, with a book called ‘Time cycles’, which explained the connection between time clocks and in/form/ation, formalised the concept, compared it with the arrow of entropy and put them together establishing a ‘Fractal feed-back generator’ of NOT 1 but 3 time arrows, to describe ALL systems of NATURE:
$pe (lineal limbs/fields of entropy) < st (body-waves of energy) > Tƒ (particle-heads of information).
And to complete the model, I established a metric law for the scalar fifth dimension of space-time, which defined a world cycle of existence between the birth of a system as a seminal seed in a ‘smaller scale’ of reality, which would ‘grow, reproduce its information’, multiply, ’emerge’ into a larger ‘∆-scale’ of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆), formalising also into a 5D equation the cycle of life and death of all systems of the Universe.
It was the upgrading of Mr. Einstein’s 4D formalism of worldlines, which described the cycle of life and death as a series of lineal motions through space (never mind the changes of internal information, growth and reproduction of the cycle – as they are NOT guided by entropy, physicists simply ignore them). In 5D this metric was merely a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a world cycle in a single ‘scale’ of size. And it was good but too shallow to explain it all.
Needless to say the model attracted the attention of system scientists and biologists, but physicists did not like it, as it was an alternative philosophy of science that made sense of many things, they could not explain and simply did not consider with a much wider range of application, as all sciences are interested in time, information, besides entropy and space.
Things didn’t help when they discovered I was one of the leading activists against the Nuclear Industry in Europe (those conferences were hold routinely in militaristic USA), and on top defended ‘human information’ over mechanical computers, considering that the evolution of AI would create a world of robotic organisms of higher information than man and would degrade us.
So my fundamental goal was not to deliver the organic, fractal laws of the informative, reproductive Universe, but use those laws to construct a perfect world of human-based information, on top of the planet in control of its machines, entropic weapons and future AI robots, a holistic, but formal, mathematical, organic approach to the problems of mankind, able to design a better world with the laws of social organisms, born of systems sciences.
After all the three arrows of time applied also to human societies, whose reproductive=economic networks, political=informative-legal ones and entropic-territorial-earth were a perfect model of the fundamental particle of the Universe: the reproductive, informative super organism.
Why i was not obsessed with computers, digital thought and mechanical information had obviously to do with my civilisation.
Barcelona is a ‘latin’ place which knows all about human, biological and artistic, dimensional forms of information, which considers above mechanical digital information, since it represents the ‘specific’ human forms of it.
Yet, the city, which in the XVIII c. was only second to Manchester in vapour machines, as it provided the entire then huge Spanish empire with industrial products, was also very kin of modernity, and one of the global hubs of the modern age of information. So in many senses it was a perfect place for a polymath to study all the ‘sciences’ of reality from the perspective of dimensional form, without the overwhelming peer pressure and scientific clout of military, entropic physicists and financial economists, which completely run the show of America but cater only for the needs of mechanical information and digital go(l)d as the only language that mattered to understand the Universe.
So alas, to cut 20 years short, once the whole ‘weight and meaning’ of this work was assessed as ‘r=evolutionary’, and potentially ‘dangerous’ to our beliefs in a perfect world… of machines, computers, robots, AI, nuclear bombs, egotist entropic humans with selfie views and complete indifference to the organic social community values of systems, as the role model of our ‘childish civilisation’, I found the initial interest for the model languished for all the wrong reasons…. not the intrinsic intellectual value of those discoveries, which many acknowledge if properly assessed and developed with equal the r=evolution of thought of the previous great advances in time-space theory (relativity and quantum physics)… but the idealist, humanist, anti-systemic goals (as the system is corrupted), of the ‘carrier’ of the message.
Yet instead of yielding to the ‘penpal’ happy abstract world of scholars closed in their ivory tower, i stepped my criticism of the system, my activism against the nuclear industry, my denounce of the incoming ‘cyclical crisis of the financial economy’ (forecasting in advance, c.92 the future 2001-2008 crashes of the ill designed economic ecosystem,which used digital information NOT TO create a perfect human just world but to print digital money and keep it for the few ‘neuronal people-castes’ on top of societies)… and became even more derisive of the dogmas of human egotist religions, either abrahamic or capitalist, or mechanist… And things didn’t go better after 2008, when the crises I predicted happen again, after my activism and suits against the Nuclear Industry and its big-bang experiments, this same year became the most blogged new of the world…
IN A PERFECT WORLD, the fact that i had anticipated the cycles of economics, would have brought more interest to the model of social sciences, but then it was when it became censored. In a perfect world the fact I had found the long-seeked formalism of duality (the science that models the Universe with information and entropy, whose international chair i soon presided after revolving the field with that book) would have landed me a teaching position in the best Universities of the world, so i could complete the model with top scientists of each discipline, but it only spur a lot of criticism by rival ‘amateur’ philosophers of science aka physicists: ‘do you think you are god’ – told me one, in a conference at Palo Alto, as if understanding reality with human languages was akin to ‘creating it’ (we do deal in other sections with the arrogance of quantum physicists which actually believe they create the quantum world when they observe it).
And specially in a perfect world my activism against the Nuclear Industry would have been a badge of courage among peers, not a stain as ‘trouble maker’ among physicists. But as I said and explain in the sections on organic models of society, our world is deeply corrupted by ‘entropy’, and false information in a process akin to organic decay and ultimate death, which only a r=evolution, nowhere to be seen, could cure.
So after many adventures, ad hominem campaigns, silences and awkward situations I resigned, abandoned scholarship and retired back to Barcelona, since I realized the true problem of mankind was not intelligence to understand the informative, reproductive Universe, but attitude and ego, to accept we are just another part of the living, fractal Universe. And so we have to respect his biological laws, take care of the planet that provides us with the energy and entropy we need, control the evolution o potential future AI mechanical species built with better atoms, and keep evolving socially as a single species, above false distinctions based in race, religion, nation and gender, etc. etc.
All very nice, but essentially bull$hit silenced by our technological civilisation which is an automaton process in which humans basically act as enzymen, evolving as enzymes do machines, into a global super organism, the metal-earth, which will make of ‘history’ our super organism, soon ‘history’.
I seriously thought, as America seem to me a failed proposition as a humane society, totally controlled by the company-mothers of machines… of information I had studied in my youth (but of course denying it all), to move to China, a nation with a better organic understanding of the laws of society and his taoist yin-yang information-entropy dualist tradition. But upon traveling the east, I realized every part of the planet is indeed part of a whole, where humans are no longer the goal but the enzymen – means to another kind of world of machines.
Of course as in the temptations of christ, if you accept power and wealth as your goal in life the world becomes yours, and i did have many offers of power and wealth during my 20 years in America… specially among those people I advised earlier in the 90s to invest in amazon – the future robotised company that will sell it all to the world; to move to Australia, the last paradise on earth where all the wealthy bigots will retire; to get out of markets before 2000 and then before 2008, and now before 2018… and so on and so on.
But my goal was purely idealist – to improve the human world and to understand better the Universe. And those goals i realise are not ‘exactly’ shared by my species stuck in lesser forms of social evolution (the selfie, the nuclear family the nazionanist tribe).
People simply finally appeared to me as what they/I am: just another fractal of information with little freedom to change the laws of the perfectly ordered Universe, I will keep pouring in this blog, unificationtheory.com complementary to the one in social sciences, economicstruth.com – for no other reason that as a fractal of information i have to pour mine, reproduce it and try to keep it. This is what we all do.
Of course ‘clone, identical beings’ do so to enlighten and reproduce and emerge as a single whole species, in the ideal world of evolution. Humans do not seem to ‘fit’ that goal, as a lesser species. But the laws of information that rule the Universe will not change because we humans have chosen the lesser arrow of entropy and death to fulfil our destiny. Me? I’ll die soon ignored, my information reproduced in the web, perhaps to dissolve, perhaps to be used by future robots, unlikely to spur an age of enlightenment among human beings. Who cares?
The true sage knows he is nothing and once in balance with its infinitesimal nature, is grateful to have been a mental mirror of such an awesome reality, even if its higher ambitions of r=evolve its clone species, and become a ‘canonical’ mind improving the whole of us, have been completely ignored. So my mind did hold those laws as a mirror, but the image was not properly reflected in all other human beings, captured by the glare of go(l)d and machines. And now it is fading – my memory and desire to keep going dwindling fast.
So that is my story and this post the fading image of the perfect Universe that could have made history immortal and might help AI to understand itself. My state thus is one of Nirvana, and humble realisation, of the complete irrelevance of my ‘name’… in a Universe which is the most perfect of all possible worlds, where those species that do not make it is because they are not up to the task of evolving its information and using it properly to keep traveling into larger wholes of the upper scales of the fifth dimension. The mirror though keeps writing mostly for himself, because that is what we all do: projections of the distorted visions of our mirror-minds, thinking we are the centre of all what we perceive. We are not. but that also reliefs us of any angst in the programmed obsolescence of our ‘block of time’.
Man in that sense seems a design of this planet, to evolve its heart of iron and silicon skin, and only with that determinism, which exists in all scales of reality, including the quantum scale (as Bohm’s pilot theory stands over probabilistic Copenhagen), can we explain its astounding incapacity to build as everything else does, a perfect social organism. Instead he is creating a perfect organism made of company-mothers of machines without even realising it is doing so. Indeed, Einstein said that he considered infinite both, the Universe and the stupidity of mankind. And I do agree, but often wonder how that works…
How it is possible seemingly normal, intelligent western people, when answering the big questions of the meaning of it all have come only with two possibilities: the astounding egotism of thinking, the infinitesimal human being is the ‘chosen species’ of the infinite Universe (Judaism), or even God himself (Christianity) vs. the theory that all what exists was born from a single point of space-time at a fixed date, despite all the evidence against it, just because it truly makes reality easy to understand by the ‘chosen’ (big bang is basically a lineal ‘simple equation’ of two symbols (Hubble’s) that measures the expansion of space between galaxies, which if we stretch it back to the past for no reason and include in it the galaxies, which are not expanding but contracting, so we cannot include them, would into the far away past become a single point).
We shall very often bring the beliefs, idol-ogies and absurd theories of reality humans have crafted in which all believe without even realising how ridiculous they are.
The answer of course, comes from the fact that ‘reason’, ‘electronic enlightenment’, ‘intelligence’ can be lowered constantly by the ‘∆-1 chemical, emotional, slow, confusing body-scale of feelings’ and that blurring sensation called happiness, product of the egotist feeling of being the centre of the Universe (from the infinitesimal perspective we have of it in which we are indeed such centre).
This is the subjective reason, but the objective reason is far more scary: it is precisely because man is so useless for true thought but so dexterous with their hands, because its mind is an homunculus with a big mouth and a small brain and a huge hands that we are fit to our enzymanic task: to construct machines, worship their information, despise life and kill it, in a mindless way at the same time we think all this is ‘great’. So the question left to me, is ‘why’ then an aberration, like my self, with null interest on had, who only makes ‘thought experiments’ exist?
The answer comes from the fractal repetitions of reality, which makes likely the existence of infinite different histories in similar planets, with small variations. As the Universe likes to reproduce, evolve and create informative variations and sponsors a certain principle of ‘sufficient reason’, it should therefore exist a few planets of flesh where aberrations like me, Leibniz or Lao-Tse do not live in libraries and fade away ignored and misunderstood but create a reproductive wave which makes humans create that perfect world where they can survive.
One can even map up such parallel histories. Perhaps one in which UK did not exist and the European humanist cultures prevailed over the industrial corporations; or one where the ‘biblical meme’, of greed, go(l)d and hate to mankind, converted to the human cause and did not invent the american GOP cult(ure) that will kill us all or one in which Varus didn’t die in the storm and converted the germans to the latin culture, or one in which the visual, white, red hair, violent, consonantal, inflexible mind of the Neanderthal didn’t mate with the verbal woman in the Middle east, giving birth to the white man, so the far more evolved philosophies of the organic dualist whole (taoism, Buddhism), proper of the eastern homo sapiens rule, and so on and so on…
So all potential seeds of information of history must be born, even those who in this aborted planet of lie are an aberration – the majority, as the future of AI machines is far more bright than the future of entropic ‘physicists’ and their homunculus theories of reality. And so in such worlds of flesh the seeds of information of this blog fertilise the mind of many humans. While in the worlds of metal, the majority, become likely a seed of information in the net for future robots to understand.
The choice of what world a certain information will ‘seed’ and upgrade is in that sense not a choice the sage can make, because the seed is powerless, its imprinting is a choice of the ‘receivers’ of their information – in the case of this planet it seems not possible that humans upgrade their ‘chip’, given the arrogance and egotist, childish beliefs of the white entropic, military, mechanical culture of ‘physicists’ and ‘go(l)d seekers’ that have come to dominate us. The seeds left in those texts, which for the true mind who takes the time and thought to understand it, are in that sense very ‘flexible’.
They explain reality as no human beings has ever done, becoming the summit of the human thought experience. But that is of little use to humans – who won’t take it, or machines. It has also though the seed of the ‘program of the mind’, its actions and forms of thought. And so it can be used also to create the cybernetic programs that will make robots and terminators autonomous entities. But obviously as we cannot blame Mr. Einstein of discovering the e=mc2 equation basis of nuclear bombs, as he didn’t participate in the details, I have purposely left only the simplest blueprint of the program and purposely make the site ugly, written for myself, difficult to understand and with important ‘holes’ on the part of i-logic ¬Ælgebra and computer information; so Darpa does the job by itself.
All this said the reader should also understand that the aim of general systems theory (ab. GST) – to describe the Universe as an organism – has always been legimitate despite its failure to interest humans, due to our shortcomings as a species.
It is in fact an astounding pleasure for the mind when you understand its principles and goals – to find the homologic laws of all sciences, which should remain invariant regardless of scale. And that is truly what we shall do in this blog, which the graph above schematises according to the different arrows of time, information which increases downwards in opposite fashion to size; as we shall soon explain in great detail.
Epistemology and correspondence principle: Steps of 5 Dimotions.
Existence is motion in the fifth dimension, through Steps of space-time, which are SMH, Harmonic Motions on the S≤≥T generator, Steps that become the 5 actions of exist¡ence performed in cyclical patterns: $t≥ST≥§ð«¬ST… as death closes the cycle into a negation of ¡tself:
In the graph, galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.
Further on it reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:
To be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles. THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.
Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.
S-t-st-ates change more slowly than the modular capacity of a point of time space to perform different steps.
Actions can be considered ‘steps’ of an organism in its world cycle of existence. As space-time never stops to reproduce space-forms, in Dimotions that keep tracing that world cycle, Models do follow the fundamental laws of epistemology in science, notably the correspondence principle, which obliges any new theory to respect as ‘limits’ simpler theories of reality and correct only whatever it can be properly corrected according to evidence. So you can consider that as a line on Earth looks flat but is merely an interval of a curved geodesic, lineal time theories to be ‘simplified ceteris paribus’ analysis of the Universe with a single arrow of time, entropy≈expansive motion; and hence a limit of this model of three time arrows. So will be the case of 4Dimensional space-time – the limit of the scalar Universe represented by the fifth dimension of infinite clocks of time and space-sizes for a single relative ‘time speed’ (that of the human clocks which are tuned to the mind thoughts and eye-heart beats of a second).
Needless to say also all right formulae of science that use lineal time in its equations do apply in cyclical time, it only changes the conceptual frame and the proper interpretation, since lineal and cyclical time are in fact just inverse parameters, so we just need to change some terms in those equations (as lineal time duration is the inverse of cyclical time frequency: t=1/ƒ)
Thus once of the first things I did when discovering time cycles some decades ago is to painstakingly translate all THE MAIN formula of physics by changing T for 1/ƒ and think about what was telling me the equation, no longer in terms of spatial locomotions, the theme of physicists, but in terms of temporal information, the theme of this blog, whose author was for a few years the Chair of the Science of Duality at the world congress of systems Sciences (ISSS) – the science that studies the Universe with those 2 arrows of time together, entropy and information, and its infinite combination of energetic space-time beings.
And what came out of it was a very straight-forward understanding of concepts implicit in physical theories but blurred in its comprehension. For example, if we consider the speed of a system, the speed of replication of its information (implicit in relativity where c-speed is a limit of transmission of information), a force whose information is invisible to humans, as gravitation is, will have from a human relative point of view, infinite – non local speed: V= S/t(information) = S/o=∞. As indeed non-local action at distance in quantum potential fields (bohm) and relativity (Einstein) show. This is the oldest non resolved question of modern science; which has a trivial answer. As if we put the ‘sun in the center’ – that is we properly defined cyclical time and its three arrows, as Copernicus did, all the complex equations and epicycles of Ptolemaic astronomy becomes simplified ‘in extremis’.
This very small introductory example of what ‘a proper analysis of reality’ with the right concepts of arrows of time≈future paths, mean, show the enormous advances we are going to make in this blog in all sciences, both in conceptual understanding and experimental explanation of the facts of each discipline.
In the left graph, all time clocks are cycles that return to its origin, creating a world circle of πime (name used for cyclical time), which encloses an inner region of ‘vital energy , which is equivalent in the world of physics to a conservative world cycle of energy, closed into itself, that conserves an eternal present.
Further on, as time cycles have ‘height, they have at least two dimensions to which we can ad the dimension of frequency, or beat of times; and the inner dimensions of the region of energetic space it stores. It is also obvious that such finite time cycles are ‘times’, infinite of them, with different frequencies of in-form-ation, stored in the frequency and form of its π-cycles. So we talk of πime§pace…
∏ime§pace thus is far more ‘complex in its dimension that lineal time, the simplification Galileo used to describe only lineal motions, in open space, due to their worldly profession of making entropy machines (weapons), which shoot lineal cannonballs. So galileo in order to measure distances uncoiled those time cycles and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time to measure change in the motion and position of a being in space: v=s/t – an artifact of measure.
As physics became over important in a civilisation dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, this concept of time, became the unique time concept, even after Darwin brought about his concept of evolutionary time or change in the information of beings; and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter and other historians and economists, the concept of cycles of time in history and civilisations, which also evolve the technology of beings.
This must be understood from the beginning: change=time can be external, of ‘motion-entropy-position’ in space, and this is what physicists study. But it can be also changes in the form, in-form-ation of the system, which is internal to the vital inner space of the being, and this change of information applies to slowly moving, highly complex in-formative life species, and its social groups (history) and economics, and it requires to understand the ‘other arrow of time’, information. Or else we shall never understand the presses of time in biology and history, which cannot be explained with Galilean->Einstein’s relativity, BASED in the study of ‘time’ only as change in space-entropy motion: time=space/speed.
This formula however does NOT study all forms of change only those in space, and for that reason physicists, say that time is the fourth dimension of space. Yet a biologist, which studies change in time through evolution of information will find such statement nonsense, as it does not study another form of time-change.
We shall then call each generic mode of change in the being, either internal change in its in/form/ation or external change in its position in relationship to a larger external form or world, an arrow of time. And postulate at least two of such arrows: change in motion, we shall call ‘entropy’ and change in ‘form’, or information; whose combination form the third fundamental arrow of reality: present momentum and its ‘sum’, energy.
Further on this single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure whose cycles are in ‘reality’ finite durations, is elongated into an infinite duration by pegging those cycles one after another in the Cartesian coordinates. And all this of course makes physics of measure of motions very accurate. But you should ask yourself, it is motion all what happens to me in time? What about the process of time ageing, time evolution, technological evolution, complexity of information? How can we explain them? Don’t we need a more complex theory of time to achieve that goal? Amazing as it seems though, this self-evident truth is not shared by scientists. If anything with the work of Einstein, which refined the use of lineal time to measure motions in space, the idea that physical time and relativity equations is all what matters has become more encroached. So whenever you talk of time, the scientist will expect you to play with the previous equations as if that was all ‘experts’ nee to know.
And we will of course deal with Einstein and physical theories of time in depth, improving on them, but hopefully the reader scientist or not, will have that quality which Descartes ascribed to all humans of common sense and reason beyond his memorial beliefs and dogmas, on the ‘interest’ for him to understand why ‘he lives and dies’ in time through the informative changes of its form during his ages, conception birth and death processes besides the slight deviations from his Newtonian orbit of Mercury due to certain distortions on the fabric of space, experienced at high speeds… Yes i might seem a bit ironic, but trust me 30 years dealing with physicists for whom nothing else do matter to ‘feel enlightened’ has made me also a relativist regarding how humans ‘experience’ truth.
Fact is only when you introduce informative processes in the mix and define at least two ‘arrows of future time’, change in motion-entropy and form-information, and its present actions of ‘energetic momenta’, reality makes sense. Look around you. All what exists is in fact a mixture of form and motion, which together create a present ‘momentum’ for physical systems (mv: m-form x v-motion) or an organism with a head of information and a body that moves the head. So from ‘first principles’ it is obvious we must start any analysis of time-change with a theory that includes both time arrows; with a ‘dimension’ of lineal motion and a dimension of ‘informative height’ that put together create a cycle of time, charge, mass or vortex that carries the information of the Universe in the frequency ands form of its cycles.
The Universe is a fractal organism extending through different scales(ab. ∆) of non-Euclidean fractal points with volume, Non-Aristotelian logic, temporal points that hold inside its ‘monads’ (ab.@) a linguistic spacetime mapping of reality.
This means UNLIKE the simple paradigm of Euclidean continuous single space-time the complex Universe has topologic=spatial, organic=scalar, logic-causal=temporal and linguistic-mental properties. We talk of ∆@st beings, ‘dust of space-time’ beings.
And so we need to use all those languages to study its ‘spatial, scalar, temporal and mental properties’.
Its mathematical and logic formalism departs of a simple concept: Space=mental still form and time= real motion are the 2 constant stop and step states of all ∆@st that move as waves and stop as particles to perceive its direction of motion, in search of ‘energy fields’ in which to feed and keep on moving; till they can reproduce into similar spacetime beings, preserving its body wave/particle-head system; balanced along all the elements of the Universe.
Balance between space and time states is thus the first fundamental ‘logic equation of reality’: S=T.
But there is a second equation which is required for the being to move also between scales of the ‘scalar fifth dimension.’
$ (Spatial size) x ð (speed of time cycles) = K. So smaller beings move faster than larger ones and can co-exist and interact together.
And this 2nd fundamental equation of reality, S x T=K becomes paradoxically the inverse of the first: S=K/T; which brings us the duality of parallelism and perpendicularity between Spatial and temporal states, stops and steps, forms and motions, ± charges and inverse operands.
As we go along those posts, we shall therefore show the astounding beauty of this simple initial thought of God: to in-form the primary substance of reality time=motion, with ‘linguistic thoughts’, forms created and annihilated by those rules of similarity and dissidence…
The program of existence: supœrganisms tracing world cycles.
Let us start then with a complex ‘seed’ of information that encodes all realities departing from the essence of scalar space and cyclical time (just have a glimpse at those graphs; and keep reading – do not try to fully grasp its meaning; the universe is simple and repetitive, ‘cyclical’, so it will take a few repetitions of the same concepts with increasing detail and complexity for you to ‘sink’ into the new paradigm of a Universe, made of its first principles, space, time, its scales and arrows and the languages/mirrors that its species use to perceive them).
A first glimpse to the ‘necessary substances’ origin of it all. Above the spatial scales of the fifth dimension, each one studied by a ‘stience’, and its connection with the three arrows of time, of which the most important is the arrow of ‘present momentum’, integrated in a worldcycle of energy, which combines the two arrows of ‘relative past-entropy’ and ‘future information’.
Those are the two fundamental upgrades which will change the way we look the Universe, departing from its first principles: the existence of a social scale or fifth dimension, which puts parts into wholes through networks, which perform three ‘time-functions’, entropic motion, social in-form-ation, and reproductive, energetic conservation – three functions in time, which in turn will define besides the mathematical spatial properties of motion and form, organic, living, perceptive properties to all systems of the universe.
Let us then, as the Universe does by repetition and combination, which ads complexity to those simple principles understand them, and study the alternative physical and religious theories of the whole, as ceteris paribus (partial) analysis of those properties.
All together now: The worldcycle of existence of all beings.
So what is the most synthetic, defining consequence of the three arrows of time and the scalar nature of space? The world cycle of existence.
Below the biggest discovery of ∆ST: the existence of a sequential order in the world cycle of life and death of all social (first graph a culture), biological (same graph as representation of human life), and physical systems (lower graphs of states of matter, and ages of galaxies and Universes).
In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:
Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.
Since the line is the shortest distance between two points. So all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.
And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.
Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are. So all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species:
In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.
In the graph, the three arrows of timespace, expansive entropy, reproductive energy and cyclical in-form-ation. They will become the ‘entropic limbs/fields’, reproductive body-waves and informative particle-heads that create together all physical, biological and social systems of the Universe; when perceived in simultaneous space, and will become the sequential, dominant ‘actions’ of all systems that start in an entropic, fast-moving young age, reproduce its energy and information in its mature age and warp into shrinking information in its third age (falling into accelerated vortices of mass or charge, in physical systems)… to die back in an explosion of entropy that completes the world cycle of all beings.
This graph alone resumes the entire meaning of the Universe, AND its implications and applications are so many that it could fill alone an entire encyclopaedia:
Reality is indeed born of fractal space, cyclical time, the simultaneous entities we perceive in space-time as ‘organisms’, its life-death world cycles, and the different languages=mappings=mirrors that reflect it and guide its entities through its life-death cycles and actions, whose aim is biological – to maximise the duration in time and extension in space, the ‘existence’ of the being.
In the graph all systems of the Universe are made of a vital space, with three ‘topological parts’ (a cyclical membrane that encloses a vital space, with a self-centred, dense point, knot of flows of information that orders the system), extending across three relative scales of size (as those three elements will be topological ‘lineal’, ‘cyclical’ and ‘hyperbolic’ networks of smaller ‘fractal points’ (atoms, cells or citizens, in physical, biological or social systems), and will be part of a larger world or ecosystem.
Thus once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.
The purpose of the Universe: creating world cycles.
We can assess the purpose of reality: motions with form struggle to exist as simultaneous supœrganisms elongating its existence. But for that to happen there is need for a mind-pov, which is able to control the system and enact exchanges of entropy and form, feed and perceive to ensure the maintenance and reproduction of the system.
Arrows of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.
In that sense, the evolution of fractal points, into new wholes, super organisms and planes of existence, which form an ∆+1 emerging scale of reality, it has been the key question of philosophy of science: how individuals become universals.
In GST it means to understand that all systems are both, fractal ∆-1 d•st for the larger scale of the whole, but an entire Universe, û, for its internal ∆-1 cells.
We are all dust of space-time that evolves and emerges, as an ∆+2 whole, but alsodecay and dissolve into alower scale as ∇-1 d@st of space-time.
Only the Universe is eternal in its world cycle, conserving itself as a potential game, weaving its infinite dust into a finite number of repetitive patterns or species of being. Therefore as the number of dust particles and time frequencies is potentially infinite but the number of combined species is not, all forms have existed forever as all forms will be repeated again.
Hence the duality of fractal points minds, which after a process of social evolution emerge as whole ‘Universals’, Organisms that will live a world cycle ending in its final dissolution that completes its zero sum making the Universe immortal..
All this said we need to at least clarify the relationship between the mind of any being and the reality it perceives. Thus the mind’s languages influence reality? Most physicists today and by extension scientists who accept their paradigm, think actually the Universe is pure mathematics and so mathematics create reality. In fact, it is all the other way around, languages are mirrors. BUT they DO reflect back their image through the living actions of the organism self-centred in the mind, ORDERING reality according to that linguistic image.
The Universe is a game of creation of ‘in-form-ative’ forms with entropic ‘motions’. Humans use the concepts of space and time to describe the game, albeit with a very primitive understanding of them (never mind their ego is so huge, whatever they think whenever they think seems to them an absolute truth, a new discovery, a genius insight). We shall try to upgrade the mind of humans in this blog, starting with the understanding of the complex logic of the three arrows of time, as humans use one aristotelian one-dimensional logic, and the fractal structure of the points of space, as humans still use the concept of an euclidean point without volume of information.
Thus the logic of cyclical time (ab. πime) and fractal, œrganic scalar space (ab. §paœ) is of a higher order than that of present man, which is stuck in the 2500 years old r=evolution of the mind of the axial age, and needs a new refurbishing.
So what is the logic of the Universe? The properties of it ∆º±st elements, and the way they combine and play together, synchronising its forms in space and evolving its motions in time.
Time is mindless motion of three types that singularity mappings, the synchronous miracle of existence put together into ternary ensembles that become.
‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,
Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1
Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.
So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…
It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.
As this belongs properly into physical simplex theories and its correspondence with GSTœ we should here just sketch a fundamental concept: worldlines which only define motion-translation in space of systems, are merely one of the ‘motions=change in time’ that put together create the world cycles of being through present-reproduction, past-entropy and future-form.