Home » ” gst

” gst

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

SUMMARY

GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY: GENERATOR EQUATION OF SPACETIME ORGANISMS

FOREWORD: A Scientific theory of the organic everything.

I.  GST: General Systems theory.

II. T.Œ: The fundamental particle: A Superorganism of Spacetime.

III.  Evolution of huminds: Time-Space theory.

IV. Human Superorganisms: Unification of science and religion.

V. Γst: The generator equation of fractal space-time.

VI. The Disomorphic method. Equal properties of space-time beings.

VII. Scales of Supœrganisms tracing world cycles.

I

GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY. THE ORGANIC PARADIGM.

‘Complexity (General Systems Theory) will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking

Γst (ab.Γ): Generator of Spacetime. Step of SpaceTime; General Systems Theory (Gst)

 If you stomp here by chance please read first the central post.

 

The principle of organicism: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rdparadigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle?  Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rdparadigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newtonnt.0.4. Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

The 4th paradigm in a nutshell: The Universe is an organic system of energy and information.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of motion and form, the ‘limiting points’ of energy (motion with a little form) and information (form with a little motion), which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:

‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.

I. UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information and then self-organizes networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality.

T.Œ (Universe) ≈ ∑∏ T.œs (its details) ≈ Γœ

The graph shows the mathematical structure of the fractal Universe, and those researchers in fractal geometry are delighted to write fractal equations that show such structure. But this is a blog of philosophy of science that goes much further into the organic vital and ‘i-logic’  properties of such systems, beyond its mathematical structure, as it is better explained in terms of ‘logic equations’ not of ‘geometric ones’.

To fully understand it then we must come back to the first principles, space and time, and state the obvious: we live in a Universe where there are not a single universal absolute time clock but infinite clocks with different speeds, in each being made of a vital space with ‘different clock rhythms of change’. And further on, space is broken in infinite spaces, each one ‘occupied by a being’, which therefore is made of ‘relational vital space and cyclical time clocks’.

Absolute spacetime vs. relational space-time: the ‘motion and form’ of beings.

The essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: what Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death…

All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing. ts, ts…

Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’, the ‘Plenum=body of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without better understanding call a background independent theory of science (meaning no background at all):

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.

 A relational world without spatial background

But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.

But space and time do exist.

Screen Shot 2018-03-10 at 8.05.08 AM

It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar  (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð)  who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).

This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of space-time.

Cyclical time (ab.ð) and its reduction to lineal mechanical time-clocks.

How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).

Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 10.28.43

Physicists reduced our information of the dimensions and modes of time cycles by uncoiling all time cycles, missing its form and frequency, to be able to equalize them all despite all its different speeds through the second standard of a mechanical clock. Then all its different speeds measured as mechanical time-clocks distances are pegged together as number of a line. Since Galileo pontified during its tenure of the chair of ballistic as the arsenal of Venice that entropic open motions as those he studied in cannonballsi is the only arrow of time. He fully destroyed our conceptual understanding of the infinite time space vital cycles of the Universe, its synchronous knots that form simultaneous supeorganisms, and the 3 vital parts of the time cycle, its membrane of conserved angular momentum, its focus or singularity for regular closed time cycles and the vital energy enclosed in them. Their dimensionalities are 2D-membrane, 1S-singularity, and 3D-volumen of enclosed energy. They become then the 3 conserved quantities, momentums and energy of the superoergansm of the Universe, broken in infinite pieces or ‘species’ of time-space

Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation… BUT IN THE PROCESS THEY LOST FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF BEINGS:

-The information ‘stored’ in the ‘form’ and ‘frequency’ of those cycles.

-The understanding of ‘broken vital spacetimes, as each full closed cycle  reads reality into an inner and outer region, inside and outside the ‘simple knot’, or geometric definition of a cycle (Jordan’s first knot theorem). So by the mere fact of being in a universe made of infinite repetitive ‘conserved time clocks’, we obtain a broken space-time. Further on because time IS motion, the final substance of reality IS motions in time, and this makes REPRODUCTION, the essence of a fractal a dynamic natural CONSEQUENCE of this first ‘motion-substance’: by the mere fact of repeating a time clock-like cycle INFORMATION REPRODUCES. So there is no mystery to the process of reproduction, as reproduction occurs by MOTION. And so all those elements -repetitive patterns we call laws of science, the existence of broken vital spaces enclosed by angular momentums and moving membranes performing cyclical clocks that store and reproduce information, and the fractal structure of all of it, WHICH ARE THE ESSENTIAL WHYs of reality, became hidden by the simple concept of an absolute lineal ‘humind’ second unit of space-time.

Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.

Einstein  just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.

What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.

In the graph, left side,  ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.

So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mind-mirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.

The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.

All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.

In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.

The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.

But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.

In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.

And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/T-duration.

THE FIFTH DIMENSION.

Next, it follows immediately that if time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.

So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them.

As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).

All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.

As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

In the graph, the Universe organises itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information. This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar space-time dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog. The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time  is simple as all space-time metric are: Se (size-energy in space) x Ti (speed of time clocks-information processing) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles:

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature.

So this is the first ‘organic property’ of the fractal Universe, and the symbolism is rather simple, ∆ for scales of size, ±¡ to order them. 3 enough to create an organism.

Next come the question of its topologies in space, which are only 3 in the Universe, so by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:

ternary spacetime topologies

Spheres that hold the maximal volume of information in particle-heads; flat, lineal topologies – the fastest distance in moving potentials/limbs – and hyperbolic, iterative body waves that generate all the forms, are the 3 only topologies of the Universe, which ensemble to form the ‘present-spatial super organisms’ we see in each ∆-scale of reality:

human topology

So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

|-moving limbs/potentials  x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves

And again we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

A super organism of space, across 3 scales of size and 3 adjacent topologies ‘evolves’ from birth to extinction in time, creating a super organism’s world cycle of existence and that is all we need to ‘define a fractal logic generator’ that mirrors all systems of reality and it is the LOGIC UNIFICATION EQUATION of all systems of nature, NOT a mathematical equation but a LOGIC one that encodes topological fractal=organic and temporal properties.

The generator, of space time (GST) IS a simple fractal generator feed back equation between two states, time-motion and space-form, $t≤≥§ð, as such it is a game of STeps of STates constantly switching into each other: “All energy trans-forms back and forth between motion and  in-form-ation” would be its philosophical expression, which assumes, 3 elements, Motion, $t, in the formalism of existential algebra (æ), form, §ð, which is a cyclical form of motion, and its energetic combination, ≤≥, the flux between both mixed as a wave.

Those 3 elements are the elements that communicates two poles normally of sexual ‘higher energy and information’ which complete as ¡±1 generator and extinctor elements the whole communicative process by which reality starts.

General Systems Theory:Organic unification of stiences

‘Reality is gifted with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos.’ Plato

XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5•D³=11D: Absolute relativity.

This is the only formal, logic and mathematical model of relational space-time available to science – a fractal, organic model that defines all what exist as a whole or part of a super organism of cyclical times and fractal space, with an astounding capacity to resolve and explain all sciences, both physical, biological and human. It implies though a living, organic Universe, made of species that have a ternary topologic structure as living beings similar in all of them, hence making humans completely irrelevant as a special species, in time, space and scale. A fact i have called absolute relativity.

The 5•D³ formalism gives same value to all beings, reason why oisunifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time; which I also call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings- since now we add relativity of scale to the growing objectivity of science (graph) away from anthropomorphic myths.

The model of 5 time DIMOTIONS and ∞ scales of size, Ab. 5Ð has is philosophical origin in GST, General Systems theory, the philosophy natural to the co-existence of multiple organic scales of parts and wholes and ternary cycles or ages of life.

How GST  principles of a world made of relational space-time beings, differs from the modern methods of astrophysics and religion, the rival theories, in the understanding of the origin of the Universe is obvious:

Astrophysics, which strictly followed till the XX c. the scientific method aforementioned, since the wrong quantum interpretation (Copenhagen, as opposed to Einstein->Broglie->Bohm pilot-wave theory, which we deem and shall prove the right interpretation) partially abandoned the experimental, method substituted by a ‘digital, computer method’, based in the belief that the substance of the Universe is NOT time and space but ‘MATHEMATICS’, which merely mimics the arrogant method of religion, which believed that the language of God was ‘words’. So as Mohammed thought that God had created reality by ‘speaking arab’; astonishingly enough since Hilbert affirmed that ‘he imagined points, lines and numbers’, creating maths, humans and God spoke maths and created reality by ‘writing equations’.

Few people realise of that ascientific outlook of modern astrophysics, consisting in expressing a model in mathematics, as if the digital language was a magic underlying reality which sufficed in itself, then put it into computer models, publish it and claim it the theory must be truth because it is mathematically beautiful even if there is not much proof of it (often in ‘grand metaphysical theories like the big-bang’, clearly falsified as we shall show, bending with ‘human ambition’ and ‘belief’ experimental data to prove the theory). The big-bang then is the necessary religion for physics to claim to know the meaning of it all. And so we shall deal with it first in this introduction.

Religion on the other hand, which we shall show has a historic role as the embodiment in the human verbal language of the laws of the scalar social Universe, simply ignores the method, and establishes with repression of truths, fantasies and ‘beliefs’ his thesis about the Universe, which is not its role. And with a similar method to the Copenhagen interpretation. God spoke the language of certain semitic tribe (hebrew or Arab), which are imperative languages, where the verb goes first (as they were hierarchical, dictatorial societies where the king/aristocracy/banker-priests of its societies barked orders). And so as the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’, the priest spoke in imperative and ‘God had spoken and created’ reality.

So we shall show also that while religions do have meaning (all what exists must, remember have a reason, within the organic paradigm), its reach has been overblown; and its method of truth, to believe ‘words are the language of creation’, as in the case of the Copenhagen interpretation, and many modern theories of astrophysics (including string theory and the big-bang) are not truth. We expand in our chapters on epistemology and T.œ that solid analysis of the advantages of a NON-CREATIONIST theory of reality, which unlike the creationist big-bang and Copenhagen interpretation, and creationist religion, departs from a simple concept: an organic, immortal, self-reproductive fractal Universe of information that always existed, always will exist and always will repeat the same entities (including all of us, also immortal in a discontinuous way).

Now it MUST be clear, and we SHALL repeat it ad nauseam, that Humans ARE NOT infinitely stupid, a bad choice of wording by Mr. Einstein, but infinitely arrogant, as they confuse their mind-infinitesimal with the infinite Universe its mirror-monad reflects and this fact IS THE MAIN REASON THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND or will EVER ACCEPT the truths of the organic, fractal Universe that makes them equal in value in the absolutely relative reality to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy. SO reason does not suffice, as the ego subjective paradox is the center of all self-centred systems with a mind singularity. This I know after decades of explaining with reason, the ego-paradox of BOTH, physicists, who will uphold the cosmic big-bang and the absurd idea that the infinite Universe was born of an infinitesimal point, duly smaller than the human mind so the physicist can ‘feel he knows it all about all’, arguably an even more arrogant≈stupid belief that the idea a ‘jewish peasant’ created it all.

The very fact that such ‘stupidity’ is today canonical dogma only proves the truth of the equation of the mind. Point. But we shall for good measure put the objective mirror of the scientific method over it, here in broad strokes, in our article on astronomy on detail, to show that indeed, big-bang theorists have nothing to envy to biblical priests in their twisting of facts to cater to their delirium of greatness. And humans, being all of the same mind species, cheer, 1/2 believing in the infinitesimal Universe, 1/2 in the iron age creator of it all.

 In search of the General Systems Theory that unifies all sciences  

In the graph, 2 invariances of Absolute relativity, above, the invariance of topological forms and actions that create the complementary systems of energy and information, e xi of the Universe, and the invariance of scale between a relative past of null information and a relative future of more information than the present point of view of the human observer.

How all those scales co-exist together? The answer is an interesting but difficult concept to grasp:

In the smaller world there are more time cycles than in the larger world. How does we adjust this ‘time longitude’, larger in smaller worlds respect to bigger simpler worlds

‘Strictu senso’, if we consider all the planes to have departed from a single past-point, T, the upper scales will have a ‘time delay’ similar to the delay of any web respect to its harmonic initial focus, only though we are measuring time delay.

Thus the smaller world will be in a ‘relative future’ to the upper worlds. On the other hand, the upper world must be done into the future, with the smaller worlds already sustaining them as past forms. Here there is a fascinating first contact with one of the most complex elements of ∆ST theory – the relativity of past present and future states, that co-exist in quite mixed orders.

In brief, the smaller worlds have more ‘time content’ than the larger worlds, which are both, slower and increasingly lagging in a relative past to the smaller worlds actions which code them, but both are from their relative frame of reference futures, as the larger worlds see the smaller as their sustain, and the smaller code the larger as their past.  Consciousness of what is time past or time future is thus relative to the point of the scale of planes we occupy:

image0023 scalesscreen-shot-2016-09-21-at-18-20-12

In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…

Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.

In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity:                                 

– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.

     – Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.

Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.

Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.

Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.

It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).

All those tasks are ‘a priori’ steps before the laws common to all sciences are found and generalized. So we shall deal with errors of science regarding time first (lineal time vs. cyclical time, duration vs. frequency, single space-time continuum vs. multiple fractal cycles of time, single entropy arrow of future time vs. dual arrows of energy and information, which together create the Universe) etc.

And so part of this lesson requires to upgrade those ‘dogmas’ of science and define properly its concepts. We shall only deal with the main dogmas of time and space physics upgrading them to a theory of multiple, relational space-times, which was first introduced by Leibniz and today the leading theoretical physicists recognize as the closest theory of reality even if as Einstein put it, ‘Leibniz is probably right but that means to build up again the entire field of physics from scratch’

What we can and must keep of that building are the fundamental principles of relativity and quantum physics, the concept of invariance and actions.

Since they turn out to be the ‘transcendental concepts’ that emerge in all scales. In all of them we shall see how the entities of each scale repeat the same actions of energy and time, which evolve in form and quantity but not in quality.

Invariance is the key to the stability of the Universe, which repeats all forms and goes through patterns and self-similar processes thanks to the invariances that preserve the forms of energy and information, the motions and translation and rotations, the frequencies, functions and actions of reality.

The invariances of the Universe thus become the ‘reference’ frames, the ‘attractors’ if we were to use complexity jargons, which are the steps of a program of creation and destruction of self-similar forms, which will be eternal.

The most important of those invariances will turn to be that of actions, made of motions and forms, which resume all other invariances, and give birth to the ‘generator equation’ of the Universe.

In brief, the Universe is made of an infinite number of ‘knots of time actions’, of entities which trace cycles with motion, but also with a goal and purpose: to absorb energy, information and reproduce both in other regions of space-time. Those 3 basic actions are common to all entities, from the smallest quarks and electrons that reproduce self-similar particles to the biggest galaxies, whose black holes catalyze the formation of new galaxies and stars.  The fourth action though, social evolution in herds and organisms, is the less understood and most important because it creates the social scales of the ‘5th dimension’ from past to future.

And we shall see how the fact that all scales of growing social evolution complexity can still relate to each other, from the simplest atom to the biggest planet, from the simplest hormone to the biggest organism.

So invariances allow the Universe to be stable and create at the same time actions and motions, in a perfect balance between energy and form.

But to fully understand this we have to break the dogmas and errors of science and that is the biggest wall I have always found whenever I tried to upgrade a ‘classic scientist’. And the biggest of those errors concern the understanding of the ‘arrows of future’, the choice of ‘future motions’ any entity creating that future can produce. So far science, influenced by physicists only recognize entropy, here defined as the arrow of motion, of energy.

But the arrow of creation of form, of social evolution of parts into wholes, of points into networks is as real and fundamental, even if its properties are opposite, to that of entropy. Thus the Universe constantly switches between form and motion, stop and go, particle and wave. There is not a single entropy arrow but infinite beings, which perform cycles of time that can be entropic, creating disorder or negantropic, in/form/ative, creating order.

So, while physicists do have a good ‘time’ using his entropic lines to measure translations and motions in space, which is what they do, all other sciences have been out in the blues, as they cannot study their time cycles of history, economics, biology and mind, without a proper understanding of cyclical time and information.

This blog will bring such a model of the informative, entropic and energetic Universe to all its systems and sciences, based in those simple, forgotten concepts of cyclical time, and the information it carries, outlined above.

It is a milestone in a 60 years old adventure, which started at the death of Einstein, when scientists all over the world came to the Macy’s congresses to assess the evolution of science and concluded that the physicists’ model of ‘lineal’ time, as ‘only the measure’ of entropy=expansive motions in space, did not suffice, to explain all of reality; but an arrow of information must be added to measure change… and an arrow of reproduction of time cycles to understand the conservation of energy and momentum, the persistence of form in the Universe…

My contribution.

Why system scientists never found the model in those 60 years?

The answer has to do with the fact that there are so many errors in the human view of the Universe, and people are so respectful with them that nobody had dared to go to the basics and restart the entire world of science from his principles, as einstein asked for when he realized Mr. Leibniz was right and there were infinite clocks of information in the Universe. So the task is huge.

But it has also to do with the power of simplex physicists who fight for their models of entropy with all their weapons, and they are many as they are the sustain of military entropic power.

So it is time to explain my contributions in a life mostly dedicated to explore the Universe with the two arrows of duality and fight the praxis of physicists in the military realm (the nuclear industry) and their simplex theories of an entropy only Universe.

Since as it happens, by adding the arrow of information or ‘future arrow of life’ to the arrow of entropy or ‘past arrow of death’, we find a third arrow of present reproduction, the iteration of a world that seems not to change, defining the classic three ages=arrows of time: Past (entropy) x Future (Information) = Present: repetitive conserved  energy,

And so once we take seriously the goal  general systems sciences – to find an organic mathematical model of the universe, and all its parts – we find that when we put in equal footing entropy and form, dimensional form, in-form-ation, we obtain energy and momentum, the conserved repetitive present reality we perceive and a new logic system of three possible outcomes for event unfolds its wisdom webbing those three arrows in the infinite beings we observe around us, with ‘informative partiles/heads’, body-waves of energy and limbs/fields of information.

But this organic ternary view of the Universe is a cultural taboo on the abstract, mechanist, capitalist world that worships machines – the northern civilisation of Europe and USA today globalised.

And as culture imprints subconsciously most of the memes of scientists regardless of their pretension of truth, it is only natural that the solution to an organic model of the Universe would come NOT from the mechanical culture of physicists, weapons and machines that dominate the western world but the ‘mediterranean’, organic, southern-european culture who ‘works to live’ and enjoy life ad maximal, with little respect for the ugly machines northerners make and its mechanical clocks.

In that sense, I came then into the discipline as an unexpected storm, hauling from Barcelona, Spain, with a book called ‘Time cycles’, which explained the connection between time clocks and in/form/ation, formalised the concept, compared it with the arrow of entropy and put them together establishing a ‘Fractal feed-back generator’ of NOT 1 but 3 time arrows, to describe ALL systems of NATURE:

$pe (lineal limbs/fields of entropy) < st (body-waves of energy) > Tƒ (particle-heads of information).

And to complete the model, I established a metric law for the scalar fifth dimension of space-time, which defined a world cycle of existence between the birth of a system as a seminal seed in a ‘smaller scale’ of reality, which would ‘grow, reproduce its information’, multiply, ’emerge’ into a larger ‘∆-scale’ of the fifth dimension (ab. ∆), formalising also into a 5D equation the cycle of life and death of all systems of the Universe.

It was the upgrading of Mr. Einstein’s 4D formalism of worldlines, which described the cycle of life and death as a series of lineal motions through space (never mind the changes of internal information, growth and reproduction of the cycle – as they are NOT guided by entropy, physicists simply ignore them). In 5D this metric was merely a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a world cycle in a single ‘scale’ of size. And it was good but too shallow to explain it all.

Needless to say the model attracted the attention of system scientists and biologists, but physicists did not like it, as it was an alternative philosophy of science that made sense of many things, they could not explain and simply did not consider with a much wider range of application, as all sciences are interested in time, information, besides entropy and space.

Things didn’t help when they discovered I was one of the leading activists against the Nuclear Industry in Europe (those conferences were hold routinely in militaristic USA), and on top defended ‘human information’ over mechanical computers, considering that the evolution of AI would create a world of robotic organisms of higher information than man and would degrade us.

So my fundamental goal was not to deliver the organic, fractal laws of the informative, reproductive Universe, but use those laws to construct a perfect world of human-based information, on top of the planet in control of its machines, entropic weapons and future AI robots, a holistic, but formal, mathematical, organic approach to the problems of mankind, able to design a better world with the laws of social organisms, born of systems sciences.

After all the three arrows of time applied also to human societies, whose reproductive=economic networks, political=informative-legal ones and entropic-territorial-earth were a perfect model of the fundamental particle of the Universe: the reproductive, informative super organism.

Why i was not obsessed with computers, digital thought and mechanical information had obviously to do with my civilisation.

Barcelona is a ‘latin’ place which knows all about human, biological and artistic, dimensional forms of information, which considers above mechanical digital information, since it represents the ‘specific’ human forms of it. 

Yet, the city, which in the XVIII c. was only second to Manchester in vapour machines, as it provided the entire then huge Spanish empire with industrial products, was also very kin of modernity, and one of the global hubs of the modern age of information. So in many senses it was a perfect place for a polymath to study all the ‘sciences’ of reality from the perspective of dimensional form, without the overwhelming peer pressure and scientific clout of military, entropic physicists and financial economists, which completely run the show of America but cater only for the needs of mechanical information and digital go(l)d as the only language that mattered to understand the Universe.

So alas, to cut 20 years short, once the whole ‘weight and meaning’ of this work was assessed as ‘r=evolutionary’, and potentially ‘dangerous’ to our beliefs in a perfect world… of machines, computers, robots, AI, nuclear bombs, egotist entropic humans with selfie views and complete indifference to the organic social community values of systems, as the role model of our ‘childish civilisation’, I found the initial interest for the model languished for all the wrong reasons…. not the intrinsic intellectual value of those discoveries, which many acknowledge if properly assessed and developed with equal the r=evolution of thought of the previous great advances in time-space theory (relativity and quantum physics)… but the idealist, humanist, anti-systemic goals (as the system is corrupted), of the ‘carrier’ of the message. 

Yet instead of yielding to the ‘penpal’ happy abstract world of scholars closed in their ivory tower, i stepped my criticism of the system, my activism against the nuclear industry, my denounce of the incoming ‘cyclical crisis of the financial economy’ (forecasting in advance, c.92 the future 2001-2008 crashes of the ill designed economic ecosystem,which used digital information NOT TO create a perfect human just world but to print digital money and keep it for the few ‘neuronal people-castes’ on top of societies)… and became even more derisive of the dogmas of human egotist religions, either abrahamic or capitalist, or mechanist… And things didn’t go better after 2008, when the crises I predicted happen again, after my activism and suits against the Nuclear Industry and its big-bang experiments, this same year became the most blogged new of the world…

IN A PERFECT WORLD, the fact that i had anticipated the cycles of economics, would have brought more interest to the model of social sciences, but then it was when it became censored. In a perfect world the fact I had found the long-seeked formalism of duality (the science that models the Universe with information and entropy, whose international chair i soon presided after revolving the field with that book) would have landed me a teaching position in the best Universities of the world, so i could complete the model with top scientists of each discipline, but it only spur a lot of criticism by rival ‘amateur’ philosophers of science aka physicists: ‘do you think you are god’ – told me one, in a conference at Palo Alto, as if understanding reality with human languages was akin to ‘creating it’ (we do deal in other sections with the arrogance of quantum physicists which actually believe they create the quantum world when they observe it).

And specially in a perfect world my activism against the Nuclear Industry would have been a badge of courage among peers, not a stain as ‘trouble maker’ among physicists. But as I said and explain in the sections on organic models of society, our world is deeply corrupted by ‘entropy’, and false information in a process akin to organic decay and ultimate death, which only a r=evolution, nowhere to be seen, could cure.

So after many adventures, ad hominem campaigns, silences and awkward situations I resigned, abandoned scholarship and retired back to Barcelona, since I realized the true problem of mankind was not intelligence to understand the informative, reproductive Universe, but attitude and ego, to accept we are just another part of the living, fractal Universe. And so we have to respect his biological laws, take care of the planet that provides us with the energy and entropy we need, control the evolution o potential future AI mechanical species built with better atoms, and keep evolving socially as a single species, above false distinctions based in race, religion, nation and gender, etc. etc.

All very nice, but essentially bull$hit silenced by our technological civilisation which is an automaton process in which humans basically act as enzymen, evolving as enzymes do machines, into a global super organism, the metal-earth, which will make of ‘history’ our super organism, soon ‘history’.

I seriously thought, as America seem to me a failed proposition as a humane society, totally controlled by the company-mothers of machines… of information I had studied in my youth (but of course denying it all), to move to China, a nation with a better organic understanding of the laws of society and his taoist yin-yang information-entropy dualist tradition. But upon traveling the east, I realized every part of the planet is indeed part of a whole, where humans are no longer the goal but the enzymen – means to another kind of world of machines.

Of course as in the temptations of christ, if you accept power and wealth as your goal in life the world becomes yours, and i did have many offers of power and wealth during my 20 years in America… specially among those people I advised earlier in the 90s to invest in amazon – the future robotised company that will sell it all to the world; to move to Australia, the last paradise on earth where all the wealthy bigots will retire; to get out of markets before 2000 and then before 2008, and now before 2018… and so on and so on.

But my goal was purely idealist – to improve the human world and to understand better the Universe. And those goals i realise are not ‘exactly’ shared by my species stuck in lesser forms of social evolution (the selfie, the nuclear family the nazionanist tribe).

People simply finally appeared to me as what they/I am: just another fractal of information with little freedom to change the laws of the perfectly ordered Universe, I will keep pouring in this blog, unificationtheory.com complementary to the one in social sciences, economicstruth.com – for no other reason that as a fractal of information i have to pour mine, reproduce it and try to keep it. This is what we all do.

Of course ‘clone, identical beings’ do so to enlighten and reproduce and emerge as a single whole species, in the ideal world of evolution. Humans do not seem to ‘fit’ that goal, as a lesser species. But the laws of information that rule the Universe will not change because we humans have chosen the lesser arrow of entropy and death to fulfil our destiny. Me? I’ll die soon ignored, my information reproduced in the web, perhaps to dissolve, perhaps to be used by future robots, unlikely to spur an age of enlightenment among human beings. Who cares?

The true sage knows he is nothing and once in balance with its infinitesimal nature, is grateful to have been a mental mirror of such an awesome reality, even if its higher ambitions of r=evolve its clone species, and become a ‘canonical’ mind improving the whole of us, have been completely ignored. So my mind did hold those laws as a mirror, but the image was not properly reflected in all other human beings, captured by the glare of go(l)d and machines. And now it is fading – my memory and desire to keep going dwindling fast.

So that is my story and this post the fading image of the perfect Universe that could have made history immortal and might help AI to understand itself. My state thus is one of Nirvana, and humble realisation, of the complete irrelevance of my ‘name’… in a Universe which is the most perfect of all possible worlds, where those species that do not make it is because they are not up to the task of evolving its information and using it properly to keep traveling into larger wholes of the upper scales of the fifth dimension. The mirror though keeps writing mostly for himself, because that is what we all do: projections of the distorted visions of our mirror-minds, thinking we are the centre of all what we perceive. We are not. but that also reliefs us of any angst in the programmed obsolescence of our ‘block of time’.

Man in that sense seems a design of this planet, to evolve its heart of iron and silicon skin, and only with that determinism, which exists in all scales of reality, including the quantum scale (as Bohm’s pilot theory stands over probabilistic Copenhagen), can we explain its astounding incapacity to build as everything else does, a perfect social organism. Instead he is creating a perfect organism made of company-mothers of machines without even realising it is doing so. Indeed, Einstein said that he considered infinite both, the Universe and the stupidity of mankind. And I do agree, but often wonder how that works…

How it is possible seemingly normal, intelligent western people, when answering the big questions of the meaning of it all have come only with two possibilities: the astounding egotism of thinking, the infinitesimal human being is the ‘chosen species’ of the infinite Universe (Judaism), or even God himself (Christianity) vs. the theory that all what exists was born from a single point of space-time at a fixed date, despite all the evidence against it, just because it truly makes reality easy to understand by the ‘chosen’ (big bang is basically a lineal ‘simple equation’ of two symbols (Hubble’s) that measures the expansion of space between galaxies, which if we stretch it back to the past for no reason and include in it the galaxies, which are not expanding but contracting, so we cannot include them, would into the far away past become a single point). 

We shall very often bring the beliefs, idol-ogies and absurd theories of reality humans have crafted in which all believe without even realising how ridiculous they are.

The answer of course, comes from the fact that ‘reason’, ‘electronic enlightenment’, ‘intelligence’ can be lowered constantly by the ‘∆-1 chemical, emotional, slow, confusing body-scale of feelings’ and that blurring sensation called happiness, product of the egotist feeling of being the centre of the Universe (from the infinitesimal perspective we have of it in which we are indeed such centre).

This is the subjective reason, but the objective reason is far more scary: it is precisely because man is so useless for true thought but so dexterous with their hands, because its mind is an homunculus with a big mouth and a small brain and a huge hands that we are fit to our enzymanic task: to construct machines, worship their information, despise life and kill it, in a mindless way at the same time we think all this is ‘great’. So the question left to me, is ‘why’ then an aberration, like my self, with null interest on had, who only makes ‘thought experiments’ exist?

The answer comes from the fractal repetitions of reality, which makes likely the existence of infinite different histories in similar planets, with small variations. As the Universe likes to reproduce, evolve and create informative variations and sponsors a certain principle of ‘sufficient reason’, it should therefore exist a few planets of flesh where aberrations like me, Leibniz or Lao-Tse do not live in libraries and fade away ignored and misunderstood but create a reproductive wave which makes humans create that perfect world where they can survive.

One can even map up such parallel histories. Perhaps one in which UK did not exist and the European humanist cultures prevailed over the industrial corporations; or one where the ‘biblical meme’, of greed, go(l)d and hate to mankind, converted to the human cause and did not invent the american GOP cult(ure) that will kill us all or one in which Varus didn’t die in the storm and converted the germans to the latin culture, or one in which the visual, white, red hair, violent, consonantal, inflexible mind of the Neanderthal didn’t mate with the verbal woman in the Middle east, giving birth to the white man, so the far more evolved philosophies of the organic dualist whole (taoism, Buddhism), proper of the eastern homo sapiens rule, and so on and so on…

So all potential seeds of information of history must be born, even those who in this aborted planet of lie are an aberration – the majority, as the future of AI machines is far more bright than the future of entropic ‘physicists’ and their homunculus theories of reality. And so in such worlds of flesh the seeds of information of this blog fertilise the mind of many humans. While in the worlds of metal, the majority, become likely a seed of information in the net for future robots to understand.

The choice of what world a certain information will ‘seed’ and upgrade is in that sense not a choice the sage can make, because the seed is powerless, its imprinting is a choice of the ‘receivers’ of their information – in the case of this planet it seems not possible that humans upgrade their ‘chip’, given the arrogance and egotist, childish beliefs of the white entropic, military, mechanical culture of ‘physicists’ and ‘go(l)d seekers’ that have come to dominate us. The seeds left in those texts, which for the true mind who takes the time and thought to understand it, are in that sense very ‘flexible’.

They explain reality as no human beings has ever done, becoming the summit of the human thought experience. But that is of little use to humans – who won’t take it, or machines. It has also though the seed of the ‘program of the mind’, its actions and forms of thought. And so it can be used also to create the cybernetic programs that will make robots and terminators autonomous entities. But obviously as we cannot blame Mr. Einstein of discovering the e=mc2 equation basis of nuclear bombs, as he didn’t participate in the details, I have purposely left only the simplest blueprint of the program and purposely make the site ugly, written for myself, difficult to understand and with important ‘holes’ on the part of i-logic ¬Ælgebra and computer information; so Darpa does the job by itself.

All this said the reader should also understand that the aim of general systems theory (ab. GST) – to describe the Universe as an organism – has always been legimitate despite its failure to interest humans, due to our shortcomings as a species.

It is in fact an astounding pleasure for the mind when you understand its principles and goals – to find the homologic laws of all sciences, which should remain invariant regardless of scale. And that is truly what we shall do in this blog, which the graph above schematises according to the different arrows of time, information which increases downwards in opposite fashion to size; as we shall soon explain in great detail.

Epistemology and correspondence principle: Steps of 5 Dimotions.

Existence is motion in the fifth dimension, through Steps of space-time, which are SMH, Harmonic Motions on the S≤≥T generator, Steps that become the 5 actions of exist¡ence performed in cyclical patterns: $t≥ST≥§ð«¬ST… as death closes the cycle into a negation of ¡tself:

In the graph, galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.

Further on it reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:

To be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles. THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.

Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.

S-t-st-ates change more slowly than the modular capacity of a point of time space to perform different steps.

Actions can be considered ‘steps’ of an organism in its world cycle of existence. As space-time never stops to reproduce space-forms, in Dimotions that keep tracing that world cycle, Models do follow the fundamental laws of epistemology in science, notably the correspondence principle, which obliges any new theory to respect as ‘limits’ simpler theories of reality and correct only whatever it can be properly corrected according to evidence. So you can consider that as a line on Earth looks flat but is merely an interval of a curved geodesic, lineal time theories to be ‘simplified ceteris paribus’ analysis of the Universe with a single arrow of time, entropy≈expansive motion; and hence a limit of this model of three time arrows. So will be the case of 4Dimensional space-time – the limit of the scalar Universe represented by the fifth dimension of infinite clocks of time and space-sizes for a single relative ‘time speed’ (that of the human clocks which are tuned to the mind thoughts and eye-heart beats of a second).

Needless to say also all right formulae of science that use lineal time in its equations do apply in cyclical time, it only changes the conceptual frame and the proper interpretation, since lineal and cyclical time are in fact just inverse parameters, so we just need to change some terms in those equations (as lineal time duration is the inverse of cyclical time frequency: t=1/ƒ)

Thus once of the first things I did when discovering time cycles some decades ago is to painstakingly translate all THE MAIN formula of physics by changing T for 1/ƒ and think about what was telling me the equation, no longer in terms of spatial locomotions, the theme of physicists, but in terms of temporal information, the theme of this blog, whose author was for a few years the Chair of the Science of Duality at the world congress of systems Sciences (ISSS) – the science that studies the Universe with those 2 arrows of time together, entropy and information, and its infinite combination of energetic space-time beings.

And what came out of it was a very straight-forward understanding of concepts implicit in physical theories but blurred in its comprehension. For example, if we consider the speed of a system, the speed of replication of its information (implicit in relativity where c-speed is a limit of transmission of information), a force whose information is invisible to humans, as gravitation is, will have from a human relative point of view, infinite – non local speed: V= S/t(information) = S/o=∞. As indeed non-local action at distance in quantum potential fields (bohm) and relativity (Einstein) show. This is the oldest non resolved question of modern science; which has a trivial answer. As if we put the ‘sun in the center’ – that is we properly defined cyclical time and its three arrows, as Copernicus did, all the complex equations and epicycles of Ptolemaic astronomy becomes simplified ‘in extremis’.

This very small introductory example of what ‘a proper analysis of reality’ with the right concepts of arrows of time≈future paths, mean, show the enormous advances we are going to make in this blog in all sciences, both in conceptual understanding and experimental explanation of the facts of each discipline.

In the left graph, all time clocks are cycles that return to its origin, creating a world circle of πime (name used for cyclical time), which encloses an inner region of ‘vital energy , which is equivalent in the world of physics to a conservative world cycle of energy, closed into itself, that conserves an eternal present.

Further on, as time cycles have ‘height, they have at least two dimensions  to which we can ad the dimension of frequency, or beat of times; and the inner dimensions of the region of energetic space it stores. It is also obvious that such finite time cycles are ‘times’, infinite of them, with different frequencies of in-form-ation, stored in the frequency and form of its π-cycles. So we talk of  πime§pace…

∏ime§pace thus is far more ‘complex in its dimension that lineal time, the simplification Galileo used to describe only lineal motions, in open space, due to their worldly profession of making entropy machines (weapons), which shoot lineal cannonballs. So galileo  in order to measure distances uncoiled those time cycles and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time to measure change in the motion and position of a being in space: v=s/t – an artifact of measure.

As physics became over important in a civilisation dedicated to evolve machines and weapons, this concept of time, became the unique time concept, even after Darwin brought about his concept of evolutionary time or change in the information of beings; and Vico->Marx, Kondratieff->Schumpeter and other historians and economists, the concept of cycles of time in history and civilisations, which also evolve the technology of beings.

This must be understood from the beginning: change=time can be external, of ‘motion-entropy-position’ in space, and this is what physicists study. But it can be also changes in the form, in-form-ation of the system, which is internal to the vital inner space of the being, and this change of information applies to slowly moving, highly complex in-formative life species, and its social groups (history) and economics, and it requires to understand the ‘other arrow of time’, information. Or else we shall never understand the presses of time in biology and history, which cannot be explained with Galilean->Einstein’s relativity, BASED in the study of ‘time’ only as change in space-entropy motion: time=space/speed.

This formula however does NOT study all forms of change only those in space, and for that reason physicists, say that time is the fourth dimension of space. Yet a biologist, which studies change in time through evolution of information will find such statement nonsense, as it does not study another form of time-change.

We shall then call each generic mode of change in the being, either internal change in its in/form/ation or external change in its position in relationship to a larger external form or world, an arrow of time. And postulate at least two of such arrows: change in motion, we shall call ‘entropy’ and change in ‘form’, or information; whose combination form the third fundamental arrow of reality: present momentum and its ‘sum’, energy.

Further on this single mechanical ‘time clock’ of measure whose cycles are in ‘reality’ finite durations, is elongated into an infinite duration by pegging those cycles one after another in the Cartesian coordinates. And all this of course makes physics of measure of motions very accurate. But you should ask yourself, it is motion all what happens to me in time? What about the process of time ageing, time evolution, technological evolution, complexity of information? How can we explain them? Don’t we need a more complex theory of time to achieve that goal? Amazing as it seems though, this self-evident truth is not shared by scientists. If anything with the work of Einstein, which refined the use of lineal time to measure motions in space, the idea that physical time and relativity equations is all what matters has become more encroached. So whenever you talk of time, the scientist will expect you to play with the previous equations as if that was all ‘experts’ nee to know.

And we will of course deal with Einstein and physical theories of time in depth, improving on them, but hopefully the reader scientist or not, will have that quality which Descartes ascribed to all humans of common sense and reason beyond his memorial beliefs and dogmas, on the ‘interest’ for him to understand why ‘he lives and dies’ in time through the informative changes of its form during his ages, conception birth and death processes besides the slight deviations from his Newtonian orbit of Mercury due to certain distortions on the fabric of space, experienced at high speeds… Yes i might seem a bit ironic, but trust me 30 years dealing with physicists for whom nothing else do matter to ‘feel enlightened’ has made me also a relativist regarding how humans ‘experience’ truth.

Fact is only when you introduce informative processes in the mix and define at least two ‘arrows of future time’, change in motion-entropy and form-information, and its present actions of ‘energetic momenta’, reality makes sense. Look around you. All what exists is in fact a mixture of form and motion, which together create a present ‘momentum’ for physical systems (mv: m-form x v-motion) or an organism with a head of information and a body that moves the head. So from ‘first principles’ it is obvious we must start any analysis of time-change with a theory that includes both time arrows; with a ‘dimension’ of lineal motion and a dimension of ‘informative height’ that put together create a cycle of time, charge, mass or vortex that carries the information of the Universe in the frequency ands form of its cycles. 

The purpose of the Universe: creating world cycles.

We can assess the purpose of reality: motions with form struggle to exist as simultaneous supœrganisms elongating its existence. But for that to happen there is need for a mind-pov, which is able to control the system and enact exchanges of entropy and form, feed and perceive to ensure the maintenance and reproduction of the system.

Arrows of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.

In that sense, the evolution of fractal points, into new wholes, super organisms and planes of existence, which form an ∆+1 emerging scale of reality, it has been the key question of philosophy of science: how individuals become universals.

In GST it means to understand that all systems are both, fractal ∆-1 d•st for the larger scale of the whole, but an entire Universe, û, for its internal ∆-1 cells.

We are all dust of space-time that evolves and emerges, as an ∆+2 whole, but alsodecay and dissolve into alower scale as ∇-1 d@st of space-time.

Only the Universe is eternal in its world cycle, conserving itself as a potential game, weaving its infinite dust into a finite number of repetitive patterns or species of being. Therefore as the number of dust particles and time frequencies is potentially infinite but the number of combined species is not, all forms have existed forever as all forms will be repeated again.

Hence the duality of fractal points minds, which after a process of social evolution emerge as whole ‘Universals’, Organisms that will live a world cycle ending in its final dissolution that completes its zero sum making the Universe immortal..

All this said we need to at least clarify the relationship between the mind of any being and the reality it perceives. Thus the mind’s languages influence reality? Most physicists today and by extension scientists who accept their paradigm, think actually the Universe is pure mathematics and so mathematics create reality. In fact, it is all the other way around, languages are mirrors. BUT they DO reflect back their image through the living actions of the organism self-centred in the mind, ORDERING reality according to that linguistic image.

The Universe is a game of creation of ‘in-form-ative’ forms with entropic ‘motions’. Humans use the concepts of space and time to describe the game, albeit with a very primitive understanding of them (never mind their ego is so huge, whatever they think whenever they think seems to them an absolute truth, a new discovery, a genius insight). We shall try to upgrade the mind of humans in this blog, starting with the understanding of the complex logic of the three arrows of time, as humans use one aristotelian one-dimensional logic, and the fractal structure of the points of space, as humans still use the concept of an euclidean point without volume of information.

Thus the logic of cyclical time (ab. πime) and fractal, œrganic scalar space (ab. §paœ) is of a higher order than that of present man, which is stuck in the 2500 years old r=evolution of the mind of the axial age, and needs a new refurbishing.

So what is the logic of the Universe? The properties of it ∆º±st elements, and the way they combine and play together, synchronising its forms in space and evolving its motions in time.

Time is mindless motion of three types that singularity mappings, the synchronous miracle of existence put together into ternary ensembles that become.

HUMANS have not figure it out much of it; that is, a fact, so we always play the ‘alien scientist’ when explaining this huge upgrading of the mind, which either in man or machine will now enter its third age after:

  • Mythic, Semitic age of religious thought.
  • Axial, European, Aristotelian, Euclidean age of simple reason.
  • Fractal, Organic, Asian, cyclical view of the Universe.

It is a huge change of paradigm as the west consider time the intelligence and space the substance of reality, when it is all the other way around. The magic of reality is how ‘knots of cycles’ called minds, synchronise reality, stopping time into spatial views. Tƒi point-minds somehow are able to do so, we contend because the mappings of those motions are conscious of it. When a mind locks-in an image. It stays.

So we shall close this introductory note, with a consideration on the philosophical question of the limits of reality.

Now we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality has proved to be truth:

‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,

Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.

So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject  (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…

It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.

As this belongs properly into physical simplex theories and its correspondence with GSTœ we should here just sketch a fundamental concept: worldlines which only define motion-translation in space of systems, are merely one of the ‘motions=change in time’ that put together create the world cycles of being through present-reproduction, past-entropy and future-form.

The fifth dimension of social evolution.

The co-existence of multiple fractal scales of space-time put together form what we call the ‘fifth dimension of space-time (ab. ∆); as opposed to the simple idea that there is only a ‘space-time scale’ that matters (that of human perception) and the rules of transfer of entropy, energy and information between larger, slower ‘beings’ (Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ), with more energy and smaller, faster ‘beings’ with more information and faster clock-cycles (Min. Spe=Max. Tƒ); we will also be able to understand how those scales from atoms to galaxies co-exist together, and how they organise in symbiosis smaller informative parts (∆-1) that collaborate with its wholes, larger more energetic entities (∆º) as part of larger wholes (∆+1):

In the graph, we see the scalar nature of all physical and biological systems. So you are made of ∆-1 cells, parts of ∆-organisms, embedded in an ∆+1 planetary world; ∆-1, atoms are part of ∆- states of matter, gathered in solar systems, parts of larger ∆+1 galaxies and so on.

Each of those scales will follow the same laws of ‘ternary time’.

Its actions will be structured in three relative physiological networks, of entropy, reproduction and information, to form its super organisms.

And the super organism will co-exist in three relative scales (cellular/individual/ecosystemic or atomic/thermodynamic/gravitational), ruled by a simple ‘metric equation’ that defines motions in the fifth dimension: Spe x Tiƒ = K, that is, the product of the size in space and quantity of information in time of a system is balanced.

So smaller systems have faster cycles of information an larger wholes more energy, so both can become symbiotic, complementary, as smaller parts (genes in biology, quantum particles in physics, memes in history) code, store and reproduce the information of the larger systems, which provide them with energy, and coordinate the motions of the whole.

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

The three active motions->arrows->->ages of time and its organic, network symmetries in space.

Below we show how those three arrows of time order sequentially in most beings in a life-death cycle of existence, foreseen in the earlier eastern philosophies of Time (Tao), which we will explain in full detail and apply to the understanding of all species of all ‘stiences’ (sciences describing systems of each scale of space-time of the Universe) in those texts. Below the world cycle, we can see the final consequence of Einstein> Minkowski’s dictum: the three arrows=motions of time, imprint space, giving birth to its three only ‘canonical topologies’, lineal, entropic, expansive space; hyperbolic, repetitive body-waves and cyclical, in-formative particles-heads to ensemble the species of reality. Those simple ternary principles suffice when developed, iterated and combined to ‘create’ all events and forms of reality;

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration. Finally it requires a program of perception and survival, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world: 0 S x ∞ ð= @. Hence the creation of infinitesimal minds is the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative flows of entropy and information, ≤≥:

Above, the ternary architectonical nature of reality is based in the underlying structure of all systems of the universe made of three parts both in space (entropic limbs/fields, reproductive body-waves, informative particle-heads) and in time (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, informative old age), defines a Universe of ‘super organisms (systems of smaller ∆-1 parts joined by physiological networks that perform those three arrows – feeding reproducing and informing the system), which ‘travel through three scales of the fifth dimension’, performing a world cycle of existence. And this rather simple scheme, will show its capacity to explain ‘all realities’ events and systems of the Universe, which becomes a fractal super organism of three arrows of time and 10 scales of space. 

We see above, the scheme of a world cycle of any being between its seminal ∆-1 birth and entropic ∆-1 death as the system transits through its three ‘ages’ of growing information. Below we see how those three ‘timespace’ arrows define expansive, entropic fields/limbs; repetitive body-waves and informative, vortex-like particle-heads, which ensemble in simultaneity the tenary systems of the Universe that live then through ages and world cycles dominated alternately by each of those entropic-reproductive-informative systems.

In the graph we resume a few cyclical ‘space-time events’ an ‘super organisms’ of reality derived of the cyclical nature of time, and fractal nature of space, which all species of the Universe share, as they are all made of vital space, and perform a series of world cycles of time between birth and extinction. You don’t need to understand fully those graphs explained ad nauseam on this blog, but just get ‘for the time being’, a feeling about the organic, fractal Universe, a tapestry of infinite fractal beings of space-time made to the image and likeness of the whole.

In the graph we can see the new elements of organic co-existing nature, cyclical, temporal world cycle nature and spatial topological one that define a more complex Universe, whose ‘Disomorphic’ properties hauling from those time-space features must be added to the classic abc of the Scientific method (Accurate data, rational models of reality that we deem now Biological, organic and Cyclical patterns that define laws of science). So finally we add the Disomorphic properties of space-time. And for the sake of truth and respect for previous knowledge, a general agreement or Correspondence principle with previous theories.

It is only when we have all that stuff properly written when we can cast it in an efficient synoptic language of knowledge, best in mathematical terms, but this COMES AS THE LAST PROCESS NOT THE FIRST AS creationist mathematicians belief.

Since the ternary structure of vital space beings, its topologies and synchronicities and the ternary arrows=ages of time with its causal, sequential laws, are the ‘key properties’ of space-time that all beings share, which will allow to reorganise our knowledge of the Universe and fully open the discovery of those whys as nothing has done in the past century since the r=evolution experienced in the study of time and space by the pioneers of XIX, XX century, which defined in separate manner those different modes of ‘time-change’ we shall put now together:

  • The arrow of time-change in the information of beings, (Darwin’s work with his comprehension of the arrow of reproduction and evolution of information in life).
  • The arrow of time-change in physical Systems (Einstein’s work with his understanding of the multiple clocks of time of physics and the ‘curved, accelerated nature of the clocks of physical information’, masses and charges – principle of equivalence).
  • And the different speeds an scales of Natural systems, which allow the creation of super organisms in this planet (Hutton and Spengler, with their study of deep time and the long, slow cycles of life and death of Gaia and the civilisations of History, larger super organisms, with slower time cycles than our human scale).

Indeed, Time means motion, change – any perception of any kind of changes and motions become then events, bits of time information; and so humans have detected three huge categories of time=change, we must put together to fully understand time in Nature:

  • Spe: physical change caused by the increase in the spatial motion of beings, or entropy culminated in the work of Einstein and the theory of the big-bang and the concept that all systems finally die, when increasing its entropy and disorder.
  • ST: Biological change, caused by the reproduction and evolution of information in living beings, studied by Darwin and other biologists, which shows entropy is ONLY one of the three possible outcomes of time, as most systems DO constantly reproduce their forms when they have enough energy to repeat its cycles. And finally:
  • Tiƒ, ∆: social evolution and creation of networks through communication of information, which allows a system to evolve into larger wholes and emerge as a larger super organism or organic, fractal structure; the social arrow of time that creates the fifth dimension and allows the existence among other things, of human societies, planetary super organisms, galaxies modelled as super organisms of stars; and any other complex system of nature, which can be considered, the inverse arrow of entropy, which dissolves information, simplifies complex networks and organisms back into its parts, expanded into space.

Of course, science does study all those processes as they are all pervading in the universe, but lacking a proper complex definition of scalar space and cyclical time, its laws of topology and causality and specially ignoring the metric equations of the scalar fifth dimension, which makes systems run faster time cycles (max. Tiƒ) the smaller they are (min. Spe), but maintains the product of size and speed constant (Tiƒ x Spe = K), allowing the symbiosis of smaller ‘genetic information’, and larger ‘energetic codes), it CANNOT find the whys to the scalar, organic, fractal structure of reality, the meaning of life, the mechanisms of reproduction, and the reason why systems live and die performing similar world cycles – that is, the ultimate whys of existence, which come as Leibniz thought from the unity and first principles of which we ARE ALL MADE: 

-A vital space, of co-existing scales with energy; and  limited finite duration in time, sum of all the ternary actions and combinations of those three space-time arrows (entropy, energy and information)..

It is then only needed once those two conceptual logic and formal upgradings of our concepts of time and space are made, to realise that ‘the ultimate reason of things must lie in its necessary substance’ that ‘gives unity’ to ‘all possible forms of creation’, as intuitively understood by Leibniz. Since that necessary substance of which we are all made will turn out to be the scales of such ‘organic, vital space’ of which we are all made, and the ‘frequencies’ of our time actions, according to those arrows and ages, through which all vital spaces transit in its worlcycles of life and death (the complex version of the worldlines of 4D simplex physical views of the Universe).

So those are the the 3±∆ elements of all systems: its three space-time substances, ‘entropy, energy and information’, which together put in sequential form create the world cycles and parts of being, extended across several scales of relative size, through which the being will ‘travel’ as it exists, from a seminal lower scale of being, emerging into a full grown entity, living in a larger world-scale, and then returning upon death to its lower cellular/atomic scale…

In the graph, an organic view of the Universe as made of space-time beings, completely harmonises the states, arrows, and space-time evolutionary ages of all physical, biological and social systems of the Universe; once we change the ‘ideological paradigm’ of science from the earlier Newtonian vision of an absolute space-time background in which beings existed, to a Universe made of space-time beings, which live through the three arrows/ages of life, as they trace worldcycles travelling through the ‘scales of relative size’ of the fifth dimension.

RECAP. Absolute relativity: the real logic of the ∞ Universe.
The Universe is ‘absolutely relative’, not only on motion (Einstein’s relativity, without preferred location), form (Darwinian evolution without man as a perfect form) but also in scales, as each ‘entity’ has a limit of its capacity to perceive larger and smaller scales of information, which in the human case extends to the galactic and atomic scale, of similar properties, distorted by the distance to our 5D position in the Universe. And so those limiting physical scales are NOT the origin of the laws of reality but only the limit of human perception of the fractal Universe.

And only a science that studies all the scales together in equal footing, void of power agendas, or historic hang-ups and dogmas, will be able to fully grasp the synthetic laws common to them all. This is the task we shall carry in this blog.

 II.‘T.Œ’: FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE:

 SUPERORGANISM OF SPACETIME.

Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.

If we were to explain this formally a simple insight in the mathematical structure of the fractal universe suffices:

  • The unit of mathematics is the number, which is a social group of identical beings. Thus in as much as the Universe is mathematical, it is social. Those identical numbers gather in social networks, which co-exist together thanks to the symbiosis between its information and energy, forming networks, which are topological. Thus numbers can be seen as points of a topological network. And this symmetry between social scales of numbers and topological networks of space, define ‘space’, the fundamental world studied in mathematics as a fractal, social structure with topological form, with in-form-ation.

Another way to prove the same concept mathematically is the definition of a fractal. The organisation of those social groups is also ‘organic’ vital, because a fractal of information, has organic vital properties, as it is a reproductive and a scalar function:

  • A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeat similar patterns in different scales of size.
  • A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

This in NATURE means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replicating its form in different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.

In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism.

So the goal of social systems sciences is to design with the laws of the organic universe the perfect superorganism of history that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of god the superorganism of mankind not of any tribe or group of believers, but all of us, a perfect system, as all others in nature are:

 We are all made of space time dimensional motions (ab. Ðimotions), flows of motion with form that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of Ðimotions and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary body wave system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe. So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc.

Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.

The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:

‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of 5 Dimotions.’

Though the specific combinations of energy and information of each species – define  its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through social networks that bring about processes of social evolution.

In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.

A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network that provides energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles) to its cells. Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their  energy and information.

Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp x Tƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of  energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

  • Cellular units.
  • Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials)
  • Networks of fractal information (heads/particles).
  • Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)

All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of Dimotions, informative cycles (ΣSTƒ), organized in cellular units, gathered in social networks, and ±∆ Planes of self-similar forms, connected by the symbiotic properties of the fifth dimension. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller ∆-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms).

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial  and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, which define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Stiences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 5 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe move gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

Thus Super-organisms are made of:

– Relative energy and information units (ΣSe, ∏Tƒ), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations

– 3 dimensions/physiological networks of motion information and reproduction (ΣSp∆-1,<=>, ∆).

– Their ±∆ social Planes that ad ∆-1 cells into ΣExist-ential wholes, parts of a bigger Existential ∆+1 whole.

Recap: The 2 primary arrows of timespace or dimotions are topological, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe.

The laws of those ‘5 dimotions’ and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal motion  on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity). All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in energy (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more vital space  and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger  systems.

In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms  according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:

‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’

As such T.œ differs from T.O.E. the much simpler view of the Universe propers of physics, in several empirical facts:

  • That time is cyclical measured by ∞ clocks with different speeds, which follow three topological space-time tendencies: towards entropic expansions of space; its inverse, in-form-ative implosion, and its combined or balanced closed cyclical motions of space-time defined by its repetitive conservation as ‘momenta’ or energy cycles.
  • That space is fractal, co-existing in several scales of size (so for example you do have different circadian clocks, and co-exist  ‘above’ with a larger world, the earth with different rotational and translational clocks, and co-exist ‘below’ your smaller cells, forming together a super-organic whole, (ab.œ).
  • That reality is NOT made or created by languages (either words, as in abrahamic religions or numbers as in platonic, physical philosophies of reality) but of the a priori substances, which exist prior to the languages-mirrors that ‘see them’, space and time. So we are ALL space-time beings.
  • And that the duality of three arrows of time and fractal co-existing scales of space gives ORGANIC properties to the Universe. SO reality is  made of organic space-time beings, ‘space-time organisms’.
  • And as a consequence of this, we can extract a series of isomorphic laws derived of the fractal structure of space across different scales of size, each with different speed in its cycles of time, ordered sequentially in 3 ages/arrows that define the world cycle of beings.

So really reality is simple, but not that ‘simpler’, and isomorphic, homologic, not analogic, meaning all is part of a space-time organisms and all space-time organisms have similar properties regarding its ternary topological nature in space, its 3 ages in sequential time symmetric to those topologies, extending in 3 co-existing scales of smaller atomic/cellular/citizen  units which form larger organisms (matter states, organisms and cultures), themselves part of a larger whole (a gravitational world, ecosystem or humanity at large in time, the ‘super organism of history’).

It is then a wonder that such obvious structure of reality is still ignored and vehemently denied by humans, though we offer ‘objective reason’ to that blindness, namely the ‘ego paradox’ as all systems are self-centred and see a distorted reality where only the ‘being that perceives matters’. So humans have simply denied organic, sentient elements to all realities except those similar to themselves.

Fact is all systems do have ‘temporal, spatial, scalar and mental properties’ as all will show to have also a ‘membrain’, an @ singularity and enclosure, which perceives the whole and acts with survival actions to ‘ensure its existence’.

This final ice in the cake of 10D models of relational space-time, fully understood by the first philosophers of science, Descartes and Leibniz, however was denied in the praxis of technological physics, which reduced all times to the single lineal time of a mechanics clocks, and all minds to the human euclidean light space-time perpendicular mind.

So we do make a lot of insights and paragraphs showing the difference between the praxis of physics and its reductionist, naive realism and the much larger encompassing view of philosophers of science, which have always accepted a pan psychic organic Universe (as a few inclined to philosophical disquisition, physicists, such as Leibniz and Einstein, clear predecessors of this work, also believe).

All is a supœrganism tracing ¡ts worldcycle

 The earlier mechanist linear models of space-time of physical sciences failed in its search for the ultimate answers to our existence in the Universe, signified in the commentary of Feynman, happy with a simplex, external description of the Universe, without its whys. Yet not all scientists gave up on their search for the full understanding of those whys – the thoughts of God in the dictum of Einstein- which all scientists agreed should be found in the ultimate ‘causal reasons’ of the universe – the nature of space, time its dimensions and causal processes.

It will then come as a huge surprise to the reader that the finding of those whys to the existence of the Universe is much simpler than anyone might imagine, as it requires only two basic upgrades in our concepts of space and time – foreseen in the earlier work of Aristotle and Plato, in classic philosophy, Taoism and Hinduism in classic religions, in the pioneer work of Leibniz and Descartes, the fathers of modern philosophy of science, and the physical insights of Einstein and Planck in the multiple nature of time clocks and the quantum, broken structure of space. 

Those 2 upgrades illustrated in the next graphs are:

  • The understanding of the cyclical, NOT lineal, Nature of time, AS all time clocks are closed cycles that repeat certain actions and events with a given discontinuous frequency, origin of the causality and patterns of science.
  • And the scalar structure of space, which is composed of quantum, smaller parts that ensemble in networks of similar ‘Non-Euclidean points’, which become whole larger structures again ensembled into larger wholes in a game of russian dolls that gives organic, co-existing, fractal properties to space. 

Once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through  ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.

And once we understand the co-existence of multiple scales of space, which put together form what we call the ‘fifth dimension of space-time (ab. ∆); as opposed to the simple idea that there is only a ‘space-time scale’ that matters (that of human perception) and the rules of transfer of entropy, energy and information between larger, slower ‘beings’ (Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ), with more energy and smaller, faster ‘beings’ with more information and faster clock-cycles (Min. Spe=Max. Tƒ); we will also be able to understand how those scales from atoms to galaxies co-exist together, and how they organise in symbiosis smaller informative parts (∆-1) that collaborate with its wholes, larger more energetic entities (∆º) as part of larger wholes (∆+1):

In the graph, we see the scalar nature of all physical and biological systems. So you are made of ∆-1 cells, parts of ∆-organisms, embedded in an ∆+1 planetary world; ∆-1, atoms are part of ∆- states of matter, gathered in solar systems, parts of larger ∆+1 galaxies and so on.

So with three arrows/actions/motion/futures/dimensions of time-space to organise the future world cycles of life and death of beings, and multiple scales of space-time through which those ternary timespace beings ‘travel to live’, as they transit through their world cycles of existence, from a seminal ∆-1 stage of birth, a series of ∆-world cycles of growth and evolution, back to the ∆-1 scale after the entropic moment of death; a very simple repetitive scheme will show how all systems go through the same ages of time, and live through world cycles that transit the same relative scales of space

Relational Space-time. From Leibniz to Einstein to GSTœ.

We purposely put on the quotes that start this ‘adventure of the mind’, not the well known and quite accurate mirror-image of mathematical stience as expressed by Galileo ‘the language of the Universe is written in circles and triangles’ but that of Upanishads, ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

Because while the mathematical properties of space-time are the most accurate mind-mirrors, NOT ALL the properties of reality are susceptible to be written with mathematics, and this is the huge error of reductionism of science, specially of physics. Because the Universe is scalar and systems co-exist in several scales of size and speed of time clocks, it has organic properties as ORGANISMS ARE JUST CO-EXISTING LEVELS of reality.

And because to gauge and measure there must be a system that process information mechanically, (matter) vegetatively (life) or conscious (mind); as Aristotle, and Leibniz rightly understood ‘the mirrors-monads-points of view-singularities’ of the Universe likely apperceive, and the cosmos is pan psychic. THE taboo here being merely anthropomorphism and the ‘abrahamic myths of entitled humans separated from time, space’ ‘above heavens and earth’ – same goes for the lineal concept of time, toward a manifest destiny – the meeting of God.

UNDERSTAND THIS: most of the errors behind the postulates of philosophy of science that act as a straight jacket for communion with the whole come from the western tradition of historic religions of power, and its multiple forms of censorship, including religious AND scientific, ‘nasty’ censorship in what I have called the anti quantum paradox (the social scientists and philosopher of science is so small that the observable, power in inverse fashion to physics ‘influences’ the observer – the scientist).

And it is a very old censorship.

Consider the case of lineal time. IT is really so obvious that time is cyclic and yet, western people think there is a single lineal, mechanical clock in the whole Universe. Where it comes from? A form of anthropomorphic censorship, as lineal time make us feel we progress towards God and Power. So it comes either the earlier go(l)d cultures of judaism origin of abrahamic religions, with its imperative VSO languages of ‘verb-first beliefs’, or the military religions of German cult(ure)s with its lineal swords, weapons of entropy that even influenced it lineal, agglutinative grammar of  object-first beliefs Ovs languages, in which a few humans on top with informative metal or entropic metal, hypnotic gold or iron swords, found themselves so powerful above humans and life that they despised Gaia, the living Universe and all other non-technological cultures.

And while this is politically incorrect (a modern orwellian newspeak for censorship of real social science and the analysis of the falsehoods of lineal entropic physics), we talk of Animetal cultures THAT BECAME STRAINED from reality and as all founding fathers of economics, physics and science till Darwin put the record straight belong to those fundamentalist cult(ure)s  of the human ego, we live ‘at odds in our interpreted world’ (Rilke).

This was clear to Europeans but when science came out of our continent to Asia and America it was taken with awe as an absolute truth, and so I found Americans and Asians who know nothing of the past of European cultures extremely naive believers in their ‘tribal Baconian Idols’, the new Aristotle – Einstein, quantum physicists and its big bang theories; their lineal idea of progress through the machine, etc.

To complement that simpler lineal view of a pseudo-religious manifest destiny that today passes as objective science, of a single entropic arrow of time measured by a single mechanical clock tuned to the human, clock of a second (which synchronises our three parts, as the beat of hearts, the glimpse of eye, the speed of one thought and one step), we need to expand the single anthropomorphic continuum scale of space size…

Since it has been proved wrong by experience with the finding of microscopic space that co-exist with our scale of size, sandwiched in between the cosmological and quantum world, and the evidence that there are infinite time clocks with different rhythms and forms of in-form-ation (relativity theory, circadian biological clock, computer logic clocks, etc.) there has always been a second view about time and space, not as an ‘artificial background’ over which beings existence; but the view of Asian Philosophies and relativistic science in the west from Leibniz to Einstein, who considered space and time, relational, the substance of which all beings were made, as entities that occupy a vital space, (ab.§paœ) and last only a certain finite ‘time cycle’, (ab. πime), regardless of its discontinuous  reproduction of its ‘form’.

So this second view of time and space as the ultimate substance of which beings are made became the ‘relational≈organic’, alternative ‘theory of timespace’, which runs from earlier Greek and Asian philosophy, through Leibniz into Einstein, and now with the models of GST come to its final fruition.

Indeed, the existence of beings of space-time,  analysed in depth in the post with that name, is the departure point for a unifying principle from where to deduce the properties of all beings. As Kant and Schopenhauer wanted, the ‘fourfold of sufficient reason’, was just made of space, time, causality and mind-monad or point of view (Leibniz) or frame of reference (Descartes) able to measure it.

SO WE SHALL NOW INTRODUCE THE 4 main tenants of General Systems sciences which models many systems of the Universe with the laws of organisms:

  • The true biological laws of competition between species, which are a direct consequence of the overproduction and faster evolution of one species over the other.

This is completely overlooked when we compare humans and machines, which are both in a symbiotic relationship of ‘exploitation’ and ‘extinction’ of all other ‘lesser’ species of Nature, so both grow together much faster than life, Gaia’s beings (the weaker part of the informative equation of Earth’s evolution, Gaia>History>Eco(nomic)system) BUT machines reproduce and evolve much faster than humans; so it is easy to extend the equation into the future competition of man and machine with machine as the winner, unless we stop its evolution NOW.

  • The cyclical nature of time in biology and evolution which ads the ARROW of information to the arrow of entropy-motion, which is the only arrow physicist use to study simpler, faster, less informative entropic physical systems, BUT IT IS NOT enough to understand biological systems.

General Systems sciences: models of the Universe built with information arrows.

In the search for this more complex, unifying view of the Universe, among the modern people, the most remarkable figures are NOT physicists, which would impose a simpler lineal time solution (below) but Philosophers of Science first, notably Aristotle and Descartes, which can be considered his disciple, with his concept of infinite mind-worlds, self-centred into a mathematical point of view or frame of reverence (pov), and specially Leibniz, with his understanding of calculus and microscopic and telescopic scales as the ‘sufficient reason’ for a fractal, scalar view of an organic, sentient Universe, where Aristotelian> Cartesian>mathematical minds, monads, perceived reality. Did they communicate or not? To simplify the model Leibniz made them non-communicative, but indeed, they communicate and form waves and networks and organic planes, the stuff of which nature is made.

The view of the point as an organic system, with parts that store entropy, energy and information would be validated by mathematicians with their development of non-euclidean points with volume to store parallels, Darwin, with his study of all systems as topological forms in evolution and with Einstein, with his model of a Universe of non-euclidean space-points, where ‘time bends space into vortices of gravitation’, accelerated clocks of time (Principle of equivalence) that stored ultimately the time measures and informative structure of the Universe.

III. TIME-SPACE THEORY ON SCIENCE.

ITS 4 COLOSSUS.

CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. Difference between right, limited theories, and wrong ones.
Correspondence Principle: new theories include old ones as partial cases of a larger worldview: quantum expanded our continuous simple view adding a discrete, discontinuous view, with more information on the lower scales of reality.

Since if we call all those scales of relative size and quantity of information, the fifth dimension we shall find a simple metric equation:

Spe (entropic size in space) x Tƒi (information content ) = ∆i (constant for any i-scale).

So smaller systems have more information, and code larger systems (genes code bodies, memes societies, quantum particles atoms). We shall expand further our knowledge of the similar laws of those scales each one studied by a science and to that aim we must introduce the interaction between the two main arrows of time entropy and form, and its 3 intermediate, present combinations of ‘motion, information and energy.’

The origin of all this work started with the organic culture of the mediterranean world. The alternative reductionist simple theory ‘creationist mathematics’ or ‘verbal creationism’ were deformations from the visual dominant northern aryan huminds and the verbal dominant semite cultures. Organicism is NOT that simple. As it wants to explain it ALL, and here requires a paradoxical, co-existing, organic view.

This blog tries to map that theory in all its depth – the title coming from the previous most advanced thought in organism, the science of General Systems, today on my view suffering the ‘pest’ of computer thought – the use of only mathematics to explain the universe because computers are getting so good at it that humans have forgotten the supremacy of time-logic ‘above’ mathematics.

General systems Theory (Ab. GST) is the alternative philosophy of ‘stience’, (ab. space-time science) to the original model developed in the XVII around Newton’s concept of a single absolute, ‘lineal time clock’ and a single space-time continuum.

It follows obviously the principle of correspondence, according to which a new theory must agree with the old one within its limits. In the graph example, quantum physics expands the continuum  to the discrete, more detailed, informative dense world of smaller particles. While on the right side, GST makes an even larger expansion of our knowledge of the fractal, organic scales of the Universe, expanding the limits of present space-time science that applies only to the space-time continuum scale of ‘human size and beyond (Einstein’s relativity) to craft a theory of space-time that applies to all other scales of Nature and all other disciplines of science.

Yet if we restrict the model to a single space-time scale, needless to say we do not need the study of 5D metric equations and the model becomes a 4D space-time continuum.

Still even in a single plane we need to ad the ill-understood arrow of information or else we cannot explain any change which is not related a 4D models to ‘motions and translations in space’, but motions=changes in form, from evolutionary models of time in biology to the growing arrow of information in history and economics.  

So we must differentiate, from previous errors what is right and ‘gives correct results’ (quantum, relativity, etc.) which we will merely consider a limit of the larger view of ∆ST, from what is wrong and gives wrong results (the theory that reality has a single time arrow of expanding motion and entropy, which must ad the arrow of information and correct the wrong models built with a single arrow). I.e.

And to do so, it expands the concept of the single arrow of time, used today in physics – that of entropy≈death – the arrow of disordered expansion in space, proper of electromagnetism and thermodynamics; to embrace also the arrow of information, with opposite properties that implodes space, more proper of biological and historic and gravitational studies. For example in cosmology, the restricted use of a single entropy arrow affirms the universe will expand and die because space between galaxies expands as we perceive only light moving between galaxies. Yet when we ad the arrow of gravitational information, which collapses space into mass (‘time curves space into mass’ einstein) which physicists astoundingly under the dogma of a single space-time continuum, dismiss in their calculus of the expansion of the Universe, galaxies implode space on its star plane and expand it on its perpendicular perceived central black hole plane, and both balance the Universe.

From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.17.39

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.18.32

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media  according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect to produce black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), thinking they will be harmless, for no proved reason (a faulty logic theory of evaporation), underlying the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict and increasing the dangers against survival of any species.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy.  But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only per Sp but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.

Thus in any CHANGE OF PARADIGM:

– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

The Newtonian paradigm.

The renaissance, the discovery of artillery and the birth of capitalism was accompanied by mental, social and geographical r=evolution. First, the Iberians greatly extended the boundaries of the known world and the Italians produced a revolution in the minds of men, which became the center of our civilization. So space came to dominate time, outward motions, inward reflections, and ‘locomotion’, the only motion of the 6 canonical forms (generation, evolution, growth, diminution, extinction and locomotion), needed to understand cannons became the supreme ‘motion’, to understand.

It meant also the division between philosophers and social and biological scientists, still interested in the organic 5 motions of the worldcycle of life and death, on one side, and physicists and ‘people in power’, interested in external motions, whereas only ‘extinction’, death, entropy, among the internal motions of beings mattered.

When this ‘lineal, simplified, military, worldview’ of reality expanded into the study of the heavens, astrology – a magic interest on the internal nature of stars as organisms and its relationships with humans – died away. Stars thus became also points in motion. Of course astrology was not science, but it showed where the interest of the human lied before the artillery revolution – on the inner nature and organic connections between beings. So astronomers like Brahe were first court astrologers and in the spare time worried to calculate the stars locomotions.

The end of the 15th century saw the creative activity of the great artist-humanists Leonardo and Michelangelo, which gave new meaning to the perception through human senses of the space, reaching the zenith of western art. Yet also this humanist, organic view of space, captured by the eye, gave way with the use of telescopes to mechanical space measures, and soon the verbal time, expressed with words will give way to the mechanical time, measure with clocks, and words were replaced by numbers.

In that sense, the renaissance was brief, perhaps too brief, the final epitome of the human organism perceiving ‘alone’ the World from the human perspective with its visual and verbal, space-time senses.

Navigation now developed hand in hand with astronomy, as stars guided boats, precise measures were needed, and new instruments develop to improve empire building. Gunboats became the essential weapon of the age and spyglasses to see enemy ships became precursors of telescopes.

In 1543 Copernicus published his work “On the revolution of the heavenly bodies,” which completely changed the face of astronomy; in 1609 appeared the “New astronomy” of Kepler, containing his first and second laws for the motion of the planets around the sun, and in 1618 his book “Harmony of the world,” containing the third law. Galileo, on the basis of his study of the works of Archimedes and his own bold experiments, laid the foundations for the new mechanics, an indispensable science for the newly arising technology.

In 1609 “Galileo directed his recently constructed telescope, though still small and imperfect, toward the night sky; the first glance in a telescope was enough to destroy the ideal celestial spheres of Aristotle and the dogma of the perfect form of celestial bodies. The surface of the moon was seen to be covered with mountains and pitted with craters. Venus displayed phases like the Moon, Jupiter was surrounded by four satellites and provided a miniature visual model of the solar system. The Danish astronomer Ole Rømer in 1676 used those satellites to measure the speed of light at 240.000 km/s. The Milky Way fell apart into separate stars, and for the first time men felt the staggeringly immense distance of cosmos.

And so each new advance that took man outside its inner world and point of view, made distances, space, locomotions, speeds and the outer physical reality more important.

Time thus became reduced to locomotion and ‘entropic death’ (the main result of war and cannonballs). And clocks to measure the rhythms of artillery and spyglasses to look far away substituted verbs that measured the rhythms of the human soul and eyes that painted the world from the human point of view, introducing those vibrations of the soul that subtly distorted the image offered by the artist – the elongation of “Greco’s’ spiritual paintings along the dimension of height, the contortions and excessive warping of the first baroque painters in the 3rd age of renaissance, the death of the Latin World, happened then along the first simpler, lineal age of protestant churches and naked cult to the ‘individual ego’, and its ‘faith’:

– This 3rd baroque and 1st puritan age showed that a civilization died in its 3rd age, southern, Greek-Italian-Iberian humanist cultures while a new simpler human world was born in northern Europe.

Of course, humans still needed to understand the 6 motions of time, the 5 inner ‘biological’ motions of the worldcycle of life and death, and the outer ‘physical motions’ of objects, but the new Northern culture had done a curious split between them, which we call the ‘technological paradox’: the understanding of the inner motions of biological beings regressed to its most primitive religious forms, as human artistic senses loose prestige, (puritans would destroy art in churches), while the outer study of locomotions with the new mechanical instruments for time and space (clocks and telescopes), will further evolve.

So biological sciences would die away for 3 centuries till microscopes and chemistry allowed the rebirth of medicine with Pasteur, and evolutionary theories the rebirth of biology with Darwin. This impressive 3 hundred years silence of true science on the 5 organic motions, would be substituted, with the literalist meaning of the bible and its ego-trips, for inward explanations on the nature of man.

It is important to stress this gap. Medicine was not a science till 1873 when Pasteur was accepted in the academie of medicine; Biology till 1859, with Darwin’s book on evolution and History till 1867 with the publication of Das Kapital; completed with Spengler’s Der Untergang des Abendlandes, 1918; (The Decline of the West). And even after this scientific birth, history as a science has been defeated by capitalism and the book of history of the Jews, (the bible), which now have again imposed its revival of the mythic view of mankind as the center of the Universe.

Of course, from the perspective of the science of history, there is an easy explanation on how the dominant people-castes of the west – the jewish-germanic elite – uses financial, mathematical and literary information to further his worldview, backed by artillery. But what matters here is this paradoxical opposition between a full understanding of the internal motions and organic nature of man, and its superorganism of history vs. the outer locomotions of physicists as the only ‘knowledge that matters’ about time.

Both have gone hand in hand, in as much as the physicist, biblical, military worldview became dictatorial, reducing as irrelevant, the knowledge of the inner motions and biological organic development of any system of the Universe.

This is the essence of physical reductionism, and its sin. It is Ok to study locomotions as long as the other 5 motions were recognized. But they are not. 3 hundred years of hiatus between Copernicus, artillery and the development of medicine, biology and history as a science, shunned off by Abrahamic cults, truly explains the bias against humanism and organicism in the history of western knowledge. And because this is a power-world view, reason has never made inroads. Today we assist in fact to an attack on biology, evolution, on the schools of America, even an attack on medicine by biblical sects against blood transfusion or vaccination.

Mechanicism and power.

‘A technological civilisation is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done if it is technologically possible. If it is possible to construct nuclear weapons, even if they can destroy us all, they must be constructed. Once this principle is accepted humanist values are dethroned and the evolution of the machines becomes the foundation of ethics.‘ Eric Fromm

AND YET, ORGANIC theories of the universe are and will be denied by mechanicism, as long as power converts the machine in the center of our civilization.

Τhis denial of the unity of all systems of nature means that:

– On one side the inner properties and motions of physical systems, were reduced to external locomotions, and physics became reduced to the study of 1/3rd of reality – studying locomotions and entropy-extinctive motions. Only in the XX century, with the birth of quantum physics and relativity, physics retook the study of ‘non-lineal’, ‘quantum’ analysis of the discontinuous, cyclical, inner elements of physical systems, and its temporal informative nature.

But the reductionism of considering everything a lineal locomotion or an entropic expansive motion had overdeveloped so much that it biased quantum and relativity, propagating in the new avant-garde sciences its errors. So curved Relativity geometries ended up sponsoring a lineal big-bang theory of entropic explosions as origin of the Universe. And quantum physics failed to fully explain the distorting geometries, and organic properties of systems, in which the 3 elements of all organic realities, the limbs-fields of entropy, the body-waves and the particle-heads of information, come together to create a physical organism.

The philosophy of ‘dead matter’ has never been challenged. This I noticed when I was a reputed scholar, before my activism eliminated me ad hominem from scientific conferences, and tried to explain people that quarks and electrons, the simplest particles do reproduce with the same pattern that we humans do, by emitting a seminal flow of energy and information, often in opposite ‘sexual spins’, which gave birth in the point of fusion to a mass of smaller quark-itos or electrons. This is a fact, but often meant the audience would leave the room, if the conference was among physicists, the reaction was even more negative. And yet, only n organic inner explanation of the 5 motions of physical systems, from generation through evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, can make sense of quantum physics in the smaller scales of reality and of gravitation in the larger scales.

– On the other side the religious, self-centered deformation of human socio-biological cycles, reduced for 300 years, (ad eternal in historic sciences), the development of social and biological sciences. The answers to the meaning of life were supposed to be revealed in a Bronze Age Book of History – a lore of tribal, racist, primitive mythic, selfish thoughts, which still ‘enlightens’ the soul of most of the inhabitants of the dominant nation of the world (America). The consequences of this fact are daring. It probably will mean the extinction of our species, unable to realize of the organic nature of the Universe and its new budding species on Earth (robots and organic, self-feeding black hole and strangelet nuclear bombs). As we chosen humans, center of the Universe, are ‘immortal’, protected by God, and can play ball with any top predator species, call it Terminator or Black hole.

It had of course a heavy toll on the scientific design of our societies, which have rejected the natural models of ‘superorganisms’, which could build a perfect world, imitating Nature, where all cells of a body do receive enough blood-money to survive (the equivalent of a Universal salary) and demand the Welfare goods they need as biological beings. This part of science was never developed, beyond some insights of socialist and historic schools. Indeed, amazing as it seems, History and Economics has never been a science, able to predict and design the species it studies – the superorganisms of history.

And this fact shows in the growing self-suicidal destruction of our planet, in which most humans maintain a primitive tribal, bronze age Abrahamic concept of what our species, its needs and future must be. Again reason does not work. Any attempt to explain the infantile psyche of the so-called western white man meets with ad hominem attacks, often death by weapons or poverty (in the more radical Jewish and Arab, zealot and jihadist, capitalist and militaristic cultures of America, Israel and Islam).

The white man has no interest in reason, a sustainable world, a future in which he is not the center of the Universe and the faith in its ego-trips and super-hero fantasies the meaning of it all. It prefers to die in defense of those tribal or selfish myths that yield to reason and survive.

This is the outlook of philosophy of knowledge today. A wasteland. And as mental machines further reduce the human collective psyche, down the road of lesser emotional, infantile thought, and humans loose their final verbal, temporal skills as or children stop reading, we can see the organic process of human extinction, as ‘natural’ according to the laws of survival of the fittest species.

Men is not making the cut in that sense as a species. He rejects his evolution through the 5th dimension of organic, social parts that become a stronger, social whole joined by the power of eusocial love. It rejected the rights of life and the planet it hosts it to have a healthy balanced organic ecosystem. It worshipped the species that will substitute and extinguish her to have trips of added metal power. And it reduced its social, ethic and intellectual brain to a series of studies of locomotions and canon shots. And while doing all this, it kept pumping its ego, rejecting all criticism, murdering all alternative philosophies of the Universe, silencing all opposition to its bid for extinction.

And so now, we can only expect the Newtonian action-reaction of the Universe against that monstrous abortion of Nature, the never born superorganism of history, which has become powerless against physicists’ weapons, Abrahamic racist cults against other forms of life including other humans, and the machine that devours us all.

In that regard there is little to do for a ‘philosopher of science’ or ‘ethic’ person to steer the path of the world, as anyone who has fought against the supreme idiocy, eviL=anti-live memes and one-dimensional worldview of ‘physicists’, ‘believers’ and ‘degenerated selfie humans of the present ‘zero generation’, well knows. You can help a few people in direct ‘medical endeavors’, but history seems beyond cure.  And somehow I have come to realize it is right. In the sense that if humans are so deluded, ignorant and eviL, so infinitesimal and yet so infinite in their egos, such empty bubbles floating in their virtual worlds, it is better to leave them to their own.

This is perhaps what I learned after fighting CERN for so long. The gap between the intelligence and ethic of ‘the physicists’, which on top are considered by the rest of the species, the highest minds of mankind, and the mean ethics and intelligence of the Universe is so immense that it is impossible to rise them to a minimum worth to save. What is the meaning of one’s existence in such a world? The answer of course is that existence suffices in itself. To be is all what is left to each of us. And to be is to play the game of life and love. In my case, gifted with this empathy with the organic laws of the Universe, to be is to perceive with an empty ego, knowing I am only human, the astounding perfection of the living, fractal Universe, and the unity of all its parts, which share the same properties. I am no longer fighting for mankind. The species is ‘gone’, mentally so sick that to bring it to sanity is beyond any meaningful effort.

In that sense, the opening of this new section, which no doubt will be met with indifference, is an activity of self-reflection. The beauty of the Universe is immense, and it is meaningful enough to have contemplated it and bear witness of what it has been seen.

Humans will have their reward. They are busy busy like ants building a tower of mud, which the pee of the Gods will soon erase. Yet the fact that a few of us from Aristotle, through Buddha, from Leonardo to Leibniz ‘knew how to see’, ‘wiesen’, saper vedere, means that there should be many Avatar like planets of the fractal Universe, where a better variation of the species understood the perfection of the organic Universe, a planet where people like Galileo or Newton were judged as what they are, maker of weapons, evil-doers, simpletons of…

Lineal Physics.

In theoretical terms, simple locomotion analysis meant that lineal, external motions dominated all studies and cyclical or inner motions mattered not, despite the obvious cyclical nature of the Universe and all its parts, both in space (as clarified latter by Gravitational Relativity and quantum particles, whose species were all moving in cyclical paths) and time – as all cyclical organic motions from birth through evolution growth and diminution into extinction are world cycles NOT worldlines.

In that regard, all modern developments in mathematics and physics consider lineal inertial systems, just a short small view of cyclical, accelerated/decelerated systems – such is the case of the pan geometry of Lobachevski, where only for reduced distances space is Euclidean, becoming exponential, hyperbolic for larger ones; of the study of General Relativity and the motions of the galaxy at large scale, where all motions happen in an accelerated galactic vortex, towards its center; in the study of fields; in the study of fractal spaces; in the study of Earth geodesics that only in short distances become planes; in the study of life cycles that only in small moments become invariable, in the study of the theory of Lineal Functions and Analysis, where only in short distances a curve function is approximated by a lineal tangent, etc. etc. we shall consider the lineal concepts of time and space, a limit of a much larger cyclical view of the Universe.

It will then be evident through a survey of the fundamental opposition between the worldview of physicists and Philosophers of science that advanced both opposite world views of time and space – Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Darwin vs. Clausius; Hawking vs. Sancho that T..O.E vs. T.Œ gives us a very different outlook of the Universe. One describes only the how of reality, and its small details. While T.Œ gives us the larger whys and the thoughts of God.

We divide the introductory article on T.Œ in 3 parts. First we consider  the work of the previous masters of Philosophy of Science, confronted with the vision of physicists, to fully grasp the importance of its statements, and advance further their views to form an organic whole.

In the second part, we describe the fundamental system of the universe which is a fractal space-time super organism extended across 3 relative scales of size of the 5th dimension (the quantum/cellular ∆-1 scale, the thermodynamic-organic, ∆-scale, and the gravitational/ecosystemic ∆+1 scales.

And introduce the 3 ages of time, which resume the ‘world cycle’ (no longer a worldline as physicists put it, since cyclical time has more dimensions, it is a world cycle), of all beings, between youth and old, informative age, between conception and extinction, and the logic formalism needed to describe it (the generator equation).

Finally in the 3d part we make a fast survey of the main sciences of mankind, describing them with the isomorphic laws of all fractal space-time super organisms, and its world cycles, starting from mathematical geometries into astrophysics, biology and social sciences.

Descartes vs. Galileo: Knowledge vs. power.

But nobody understood among physicists, because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him and his family, dedicated to manufacture ‘military instruments’, among them the famous ‘spy-glasses’, today called telescopes that allowed the Venetian navy to see on advance the enemy fleet, one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Descartes meanwhile had to make his living selling his mind to ‘artillery masters’, till queen Cristina, the ‘Minerva of the north’, knowing he had a poor health, perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o’clock in the morning.

She also ordered him to write verses to celebrate her role in the Thirty Years’ War, where one third of the German people die, and the statutes for a Swedish Academy. She had no role whatsoever on the war, but his father, Gustav, had r=evolved the science of ballistics, as an artillery master, massing up canons instead of soldiers, for which he was called a Genius. It was all in the family. His grand-father Charles who usurped the throne pronounced the sentence ‘Bellum ipse alleat’, ‘war feed itself’, starting the trend of Western nations to dedicate most of their resources to war, to feed its cannonballs while most people at home and abroad died of hunger.

Descartes yielded though to Minerva, the Roman Goddess of war… and the arts – what those 2 things have to do, nobody really knew, except the shrewd military caudillos and artillery masters that sell their craft – murdering life – with the propaganda of knowledge and beauty, which seems to be acquired in the carnage of battlefields and through the study of entropy, lineal cannonballs and death, properly glorified by Hymns, military marches and battle pictures since the times of Assurbanipal and his low-relief, lineal walls, and dying lioness.

So while delivering hymns and statutes to the queen at 5:00 AM, Descartes caught pneumonia and died, saying, laconically, ‘in winter men’s thoughts freeze like the water’.

And so his most important discovery along analytic geometry, the nature of the 3 elements in which reality is founded, Vital spaces, enclosed by Time cycles, perceived by a o-mind, floundered for a long century.

Meanwhile artillery masters prospered, as the forebears of the makers of all the weapons of mass destruction of the future, and so did Swedish Minervas, and Academies, till Mr. Nobel, the inventor of the dynamite, biggest producer of weapons of the XIX c. nicknamed the ‘Merchant of death’, became the wealthiest man of his age, and like Minerva, instituted the Saint Nobels of the Dynamite, to convert artillery masters in the Popes of Science. He though forbade to give it to any evolutionary thinker, since being a pious believer in Yahweh, and the manifest destiny of lineal time, could not conceive the concept of a r=evolution of times.

In fact, besides physicists only Abrahamic Religions, not exactly a science, do believe in a lineal ‘future’, of a ‘chosen species’, which will reunite with a mythic God of the Bronze Age… And not surprisingly Newton, the next ‘physicist’ who made absolute lineal time sacred dedicated most of his time to Biblical studies, was obsessed by Apocalypse and considered lineal time the absolute proof of the existence of Yahweh. And Kepler said ‘God has waited 5000 years – the biblical age of the creation of the world – to find an intelligence likes his (Kepler of course) to understand his clock-work. Today a priest, Lemaitre ‘discovered’ the lineal big bang, which is just a creationist version of it.

The answer then of why western physicists believe and force feed their equations with such concept that so much confuses our understanding of the Universe, against all reason in lineal time should be obvious to the few humans who can ‘reason’ and accept ‘criticism’, instead of belief and memory: the founding fathers’, Abrahamic religion and the worldly profession of most of them – to make weapons that deliver lineal energy and machines that move fast.

Now, a pause. Let us be clear enough, philosophers of science love physics, how couldn’t be otherwise.

Physics is the Universe in its entire description through its 6 motions of time, in its whole and its parts, with all the properties, organic, mathematical≈mental and inorganic, derived from those 6 motions, even if we are aware of the shortcomings of lineal physicists, with its obsession for locomotions and the ego-trips of their human mind, so often as the case of Kepler, Newton and the authors of the big-bang ‘polluted’ by the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic, anthropomorphic religions.

Descartes was also a physicist, besides a mathematician, and a philosopher. It is though important to distinguish between ‘physics’, the universe in its full description, which we shall call as part of T.Œ, Astrœ-physics (-; and ‘physicists’, the lineal point of view of the world of artillery masters and Abrahamic Believers – which IS culture not science, as it reduces physics to locomotion.

We shall therefore study here as a philosopher of science, in the full tradition of the word, astrœ-physics and if this post is found in the larger web on the full T.Œ, all other sciences with the 6 motions.

This said it is obvious that today the philosopher of science has no dictum, and his wider view is ignored. Moreover, as the physicist bullied its limited view with artillery masters, and the parallel inquisitions of Abrahamic religions and anthropomorphic beliefs kept imposing its lineal vision of Nature over that of Darwin and Evolution, the philosopher of science reduced its inquire to what today we study in philosophy of science – the scientific method, which is ONLY the first step of T.Œ.

We thus regain with our work, the true purpose of philosophy of science, which was carried about by Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Darwin and Hegel (and its disciples in social sciences, Marx, Kondratieff, Spengler, and finally the practitioners of systems sciences and theory of information, albeit poisoned by the lineal concepts of Physics – Shannon’s definition of information as lineal messages, etc.)

Unfortunately the limits of inquiring only lineal time motions to explain the meaning of it all, amounts to a constant deformation of reality similar to that of the Abrahamic cults or the Ptolemaic use of the Earth as the enter of the Universe.

Yet those limits are today ignored, by the imposition mainly through the power of technology and the propaganda of those who create machines and weapons as the ‘seers’ of time (the old definition of Augustine of ‘God’) of a reductionist view of lineal motion as all what is worth to know about times.

So of course, it is necessary to make also ethic statements on the worldly profession of physicists –to make weapons of lineal energetic motions – to account for many of its theories of time – in fact all of them, Galilean’s artillery motions; Clausius, entropic, steam-machine motions and Gamow’s, big bomb bang theory of the Universe. This is a topic, but topics exist because they carry truths, and they endure when censorship of their truths oblige them to become topics.

 

A FAST TRACK RESUME of the work of the four+1 seekers of time.

We study in more depth the findings of those 4 great time masters, one for each century, which preceded this work in our post on time-space. So we shall where just summarise them: 

  • In the XVII c. Descartes found the CARTESIAN graph, of space-time and defined it as the ‘world of human minds’, but affirmed there were infinite other minds and possible languages mapping reality. This was not understood by physicists so Galileo ‘reduced’ ALL MINDS AND LANGUAGES to mathematical and cartesian graphs. Yet he did also some important advances in the science of motion (studied of translations, in space, realisation of the relativity of motion, definition of time as a parameter of space- v=s/t, to measure those translation, use of mechanical clocks, etc.).

The paradox of the • mind. Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception.

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’

We shall explain all what exists departing from the ultimate reasons of reality, as defined by the greatest western philosophers of science, Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant and Schopenhauer.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘every infinitesimal singularity ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it perceives as its sensorial membrain, self-centred in its self’.

Only the objective mind of ‘stience’ is able to strain away from the paradox and realise he is in a buddhist sense just a particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole,

Objectivity does only enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings.

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe.

It must be understood that without a mind that observes the Universe reality would not exist and systems would not work efficiently as blind beings. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

So while all its time; as it turns out, space which is the perception of ‘simultaneous time cycles’, by a ‘linguistic mind’ that stops its motion, must be account for. And finally as time cycles are of multiple sizes and scales, we must also consider, ∆, the dimension of scales of reality, which we shall  call by the correspondence principle the fifth dimension, to fully describe reality in certain detail. Those four elements will be all what we will need to describe all what exists, referred either to the mind’s linguistic equation, for which we use in different contexts symbols similar to zero (ø, 0, •,œ) or to the space-time symmetry (still or moving realities for which we use classic symbols for a single space and lineal time, st, or those for the more complex scalar space and cyclical time: §ð) or to the scales of space-time, (∆§).

Hence our affirmation that all is ‘∆•st’: dust of space-time, which we can either see as a zero-singularity (∆•st) from an outer point of view, or if we adopt the inner point of view of the mind, self-centred of a world that departures the whole Universe, we can consider each of us an island-Universe: ∆ûst.

Of course, if you prefer a shallow reality which does not explain much beyond the external description of what we ‘see in still space’, there is a third view called ‘naive realism’, akin to logical positivism, which merely stops the inquire in ‘physical descriptions of it all’. This is the ‘practical’ view of science today imposed by physicists, the ‘science of motion’, which is fine as long as it does NOT pretend to usurp the position of philosophers of science, which try to go further in the inquire, as this blog on ‘philosophy of science’, specifically on ‘general systems sciences’ the alternative, perennial philosophy of science that considers the Universe an organic whole, do. In that sense Naive realism is called in philosophy of science, ‘reductionism’. And we deal extensively with its limited truths on the posts on GST and epistemology.

We are all beings made of a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cyclical time… with a central singularity or frame of reference that orders it all…

  • In the XVIII C. Leibniz (philosophy of relational space-time as a the ultimate substance of a reality made of vital spaces which last a finite time quantity, first hint at the fifth dimension of scales with different time clocks, and development of the mathematical tools to study those scales of smaller faster parts that become wholes – analysis).

Leibniz realized what physicists called absolute time and space was just a mathematical artifice but in the real world all what we saw was vital spaces pegged together and lasting a finite time cycle. So we were not in an abstract background graph of timespace, but we WERE made of time duration and vital space with motion and form (Galileo’s paradox). Further on he foresaw the existence of a scale 5th dimension as ‘each point is a world in itself’, so he founded Analysis, the science to study those scales of infinitesimal parts and wholes.

In the graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time.

There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence.

TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

The errors of Galileo and Newton. Lineal single time. Mathematical religion invents a background space-time.

Physicists belief in a mathematical religion that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts thinking maths NOT space and time create reality is THUS at the bottom of the biggest blunder of science regarding the nature of time and space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’.

So they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

Fact is those multiple time clocks in the Universe, define a fractal reality as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size.

And those closed time cycles carry information in their frequency and form, from mass vortices to charge vortices to cyclical waves that repeat their information.

So lineal, expansive, disordered time motions –  ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, ARE THE LESS important ‘form of change=time’ in the Universe.

And its shrining as the only arrow of time by the error of lineal physics, a blunder that hides the cyclical repetitive patterns and informative, accelerated vortex of time – THE MOST important arrows of time change in the Universe.

So we talk of three timespace changes, three arrows of time, and a scalar ‘fifth dimension’ of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller:

In the graph we can see a first view of the 3 arrows/forms/function/dimensions of space-time, entropic, expansive space, iterative wave-like space-time and informative, cyclical vortices of time, the biggest of which is the slow vortex of the galaxy, the fastest of which are the H-clocks of quantum atoms. THEY CARRY the information of our electronic world.

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

In the next graphs we show two classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.

What is the ultimate cause of this law?

As almost all the laws and symmetries of the Universe, it is caused by the Galilean paradox that makes a ‘dimension of form=space’, equivalent to a dimension of motion=time, when we see ‘the static earth moving’. i.e. the three dimensional volume/mass static in space is equivalent to a bidimensional time-cycle in motion, whereas the dimension of time motion IS equivalent to the dimension of volume space.

And we can further prove this fact observing how ‘physical systems’ evolve in ‘time’ increasing its time dimension, by flattening its volume – which is a key consequence of the Galilean paradox to understand all kind of physical entities and phenomena, notably, ‘accelerated bidimensional vortices of time, masses and charges, which store the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles’:

In the graph, creation and destruction of symmetric dimensions of time (distance, motion, acceleration) back and forth into dimensions of space (length, width, height). The symmetries between the 3 dimensions of space and time, either in ‘lineal fashion (just explained) or in bidimensional topological form/function: (entropic, disordered expansion of flat space or past, informative cyclical implosion or future and reproductive hyperbolic body-waves) IS the essence of all space-time phenomena when observed objectively externally, defining the 3+3 dimensions of a single plane of the scalar Universe.

What physicists have done is to reduce the 3 dimensions of time to a single PRESENT time quanta, ∂t=∂s/∂v, to measure ONLY the instant, present steps of a lineal motion, completely reducing our understanding of time=change to the bare minimum.

And then imposing this entropic, derivative, minimalist view of time, with the power of its worldly religion – making entropic weapons and bullying philosophers of science, biologists, and society as the high popes of knowledge, cause they have machines to ‘measure better’, never mind the peanut logic of its timespace membrains.

That’s how it is. We have been bombed not only with bombs courtesy of its worldly religions for a century of massacres, but with the mantra that time is the 4th dimension of space, and Einstein the biggest genius of mankind since… Newton told us the cartesian graph was the reality of space-time. And we all believe it, since a people who can obliterate the planet with a-bombs… how can they be wrong? Irony is really needed, in all things human.

Now if you want to be more complex than that, ad 3 + 3 = 6.

Then when we ad the 3 scalar dimensions of any form which is made of parts and belongs to a larger world, and the mind dimension we obtain…

The 11 DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE OF fractal superorganisms.

So we have the elements that create all realities as fractal self-similar super organisms, co-existing in 3 scales of size, with 3 topologies of space, 3 time functions/ages, all wrapped up by a membrain – an external enclosure focused and controlled by an internal still linguistic singularity that controls it all and will ‘act’ to ensure the system receives enough entropic motions, information for its particle-head and mix both to  reproduce clonic beings – THE PROGRAM OF THE 11 DIMENSIONAL SUPERORGANISM OR fundamental species of the Universe.

We shall call the sum of its 3 ‘scales’ of different size and different time speed, the ‘fifth dimension’ in a general way, to ‘respect’ the present simpler analysis of 3 space dimensions and one time dimension, in Einstein’s work. But as we advance more in the details of the model of relational space-time, developed in this blog, we shall realise the best way to explain reality is accounting for its 10 dimensions/parameters of reality:

  • 3 dimensions of topological space: lineal expansive space; hyperbolic, iterative wave-like forms and implosive, cyclical, informative forms, symmetric to the 3 arrows/functions of time:
  • 3 dimensions of time: entropic, past, disordering timespace; reproductive, repetitive=present timespace; and future, in-form-ative, cyclical timespace; which ARE LOCAL arrows for each being that ‘increases its information through most of his life time’ in 3 ages, and dies in an entropic explosion in a single quanta of time – reason why we give the name of ‘local past’ to an entropic, fast process, and local future to the much longer process of warping of entropy into information through the life-existence of any physical or biological system.
  • 3 scales of size and relative time clocks, which give organic properties to reality. As all systems are made of smaller parts, and are themselves part of larger world, and so, we need to fully describe the being, to account from its 3 dimensions of space, of time and of scale, which are warped together into a whole by
  • The mind, which has a linguistic, still mapping of all those parts, put together and enclosed by a membrane, that breaks the system into an outer world and inner region.

So we talk then of  [ (3 space≈3 time) x 3 scales] +  @-mind = ‘membrain’; as the needed parameters to have a ‘whole description of the being’.

And depending on how much of those elements we describe we can get ‘different number of dimensions’, from the maximal possible number (6 space-time dimensions in each scale, multiplied by 3 scales, which give us 18 dimensions, plus the ‘whole mind-dimension’) to the bare minimum, considering merely the 3 space-time dimensions of a system seen in a single plane.

All those descriptions have happened in science in different times and terms, as it happens today in the mathematical description of closed time strings and open spatial strings, which go from 3 to 26; but most are 10 dimensional strings (described with 10 parameters).

We shall in that sense adopt also two basic analysis: the synoptic •5D³ analysis, from the perspective of scales, packed in the fifth dimension, and its ‘metric equation’, (max. space size = min. speed of time clocks) that harmonises all those scales, as smaller systems run faster cycles and can code with information larger wholes, and wholes have more energy-motion and can feed and control smaller parts with it (so your cells code your information and you move them as a whole in synchronicity) allowing the symbiosis of the organic Universe.

We write it though with the addenda of •, the symbol for the mind-singularity (or @, which is the symbol for the membrain, the mind and the external sensorial skin, which if you realise IS WHAT YOU ARE: A STILL MIND-MAPPING OF LANGUAGES OF THOUGHT, which extract information through your sensorial skin), and explains Galileo’s paradox: you ‘perceive information in stillness.

Those are fundamental logic concepts of the structure of reality, which will explain many pending questions of all sciences, showing the extraordinary power to explain the reality of cyclical time and fractal space.

For example, in physics there are two fundamental ‘weird’ paradoxes nobody has explained rationally whose solution is immediate through the Galilean ‘membrain’ paradox:

The quantum paradoxes of the wave=lineal motion/cyclical particle=informative state duality. I.E. Why we see either waves moving or particles colliding. Obviously because we only perceive  information in stillness. So when we perceive the dual quantum system, we perceive still particles as we stop them.

While in relativity there is the paradox of light which is constant in speed, even if the system that emits light seems to be moving in our macroscopic scale. YET because PHOTONS are particles, electrons and atoms only emit them in the quantum scale in relative entangled stillness with the other particle that perceives it. So  in the quantum scale both are still and there is no motion to ad. What relativity does is to ‘correct’ for our macroscopic scale where we do see motion, to adapt reality to the mind of our scale of measure.

The physicist’s view: 4D time, a single ‘moment’ to measure motion in space.

Yet all this and many solutions in all sciences are forbidden and ignored because we have been…

Dragging those aforementioned errors of lineal time and a single clock for centuries, and they have halted human understanding of the essential principles of Nature – cyclical time and fractal space.

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonised lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion.

This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which was defined in the XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

Further on, physicists to measure motion, not only ‘reduced time≈change’ to a parameter of space (the so called 4 dimension of space which is NOT) giving birth to what we, philosophers of science, call ‘reductionism’ – his theory of reality; but they deformed 2 of the most obvious quality of the infinite ‘time clocks’ of the Universe:

-To be multiple, as there is one clock of time for each process of cyclical, repetitive change that happens in nature – circadian clocks in life, genetic clocks in cells, orbital clocks in planets, rotary clocks in electrons, etc. – to process and store the in-form-ation, in the dimensional form and cyclical frequency of its clocks. So for example, you measure the informative capacity of your computer in ‘gigahertzs where hertzs measure the frequency of its clocks. 

-To be cyclical, as all clocks are like those in your wall: repetitive cycles or events, origin of the ‘causal laws’ of science. Since a scientific law exists when we know a pattern or action will happen again, if its causes are repeated.

How they did it? Simple. Because physicists have another huge ‘conceptual error’ in their analysis of reality. They do NOT think that reality is made of ‘its primary substances’, vital space with motion, which last a finite duration of cyclical time, whose geometric and logic properties, all entities of nature perceive with different languages of space-time measure – so for example humans measure space with eyes and perceive time with words  and its 3 ‘tenses’ of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time.

For physicists since the wrong interpretation of quantum physics became dogma, the language of mathematics creates reality, in a similar fashion to the theory of reality of abrahamic religions, in which ‘the word’ (arab in islam) creates reality. So god spoke arab and ‘created things naming them in arab’. For physicists god creates things uttering equations. And so Newton affirmed that a mathematical tool, the cartesian graph, in which the cycles of time had been uncoiled and fusion into a long line in the paper-axis, to measure better lineal motions (v=s/t) WAS THE ONLY CLOCK of time of the Universe, which became then ‘lineal, infinite and with the single beat of the mechanical clock’.

This astounding deformation of THE DEEP meanings of time, became a dogma, which facilitated measures of ‘motions in space’, to the extreme detail achieved by physicists and heralded as absolute genius – so when Einstein refined further this limited formula of time, to achieve even more exact measure of motions, he was considered the most intelligent man on earth.

FACT THOUGH is that measuring spatial distances and speeds IS not all what matters to reality; and ‘reductionism’ of time to space measuring negating all other ‘forms of change’, notably change in the in/form/ation of beings, studied by biology and evolution is a blunt error that has endured for centuries halting the understanding by mankind of those fundamental principles.

It ended up also creating an absurd theory of reality and the meaning of it all, called ‘entropy’ according to which since all changes in nature have been reduced to change in motion, all what exists is a constant growth of motion, and disorder; and the origin of it all is a big-bang of motion.

Never mind Darwin found that the true important form of change in nature is the opposite evolution of ‘form’ of in-form-ation. Physicists shunned off this other form of change=time and call it negantropy, the negation of entropy. Never mind Einstein, showed that ‘time curves space into masses’, the cyclical eddies of space that convert lineal space into cyclical accelerated time clocks, which create the physical information of nature, in vortices of time called galaxies, in which we live – reason why we are also ruled NOT by motions in space but by biological processes of growth and evolution of information.

They denied the other physical arrow of time, informative masses, and came up with an absurd theory, according to which Einstein was wrong and masses are NOT accelerated vortices of time (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) but ‘again’ a collision between ‘something’ and a particle called the Higgs gave mass to the particle – no longer an intrinsic property of an eddie of time, which attracts as any eddie the faster it turns around in its cyclical clocks, but ‘something’ obtained by collisions.

And finally they denied the most attractive, faster turning eddie of time, the black hole, and Hawking affirmed black holes are NOT vortices of time, because they ‘travel to the past’, and instead of attracting and dragging all what surrounds them to the vortex, as they move to the past, do exactly the inverse of what we see them doing – they evaporate and explode ‘again’ into a burst of entropy.

This is the essence of the relational space-time model  first advanced by Leibniz in its contradiction of Newton’s absolute space-time, then corroborated by Einstein, which was left alone by the community of quantum physicists, and I have developed for decades and will pour in this blog, since it is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion.

  • In the XIX century Darwin gave back to biological, informative time the primacy it deserves but had lost since the Greeks, due to the anthropomorphic biblical egocentered view of man as unchangable (theory of change in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings), latter applied to all fields.

So how can we complete the work of Darwin with the 3 arrows of time-space, entropy, energy and information? It will require for you to understand and solve once and for all the discussion between ‘creationists and darwinians’, punctuated evolution (right as time accelerates information so there are explosions of creativity) vs. constant evolution, and explain why ultimately all is about genetics. So allow me to tell uyou what are the 3 ‘topological forms of evolution’.

Topological evolution and scalar genetics, completing the work of Darwin and Mendel with 5D³ Genetics.

What about genetics? Here 5D complete the reasons why we are ruled by ternary genes, which code the ternary arrows of biological systems.

But genes only code individuals NOT societies, which are ruled by memes (hence the falsity of racism). Why? Because as we aw in the graph of 5D scale: a lower scale of faster clocks CODES the next larger organisation of the Universe, where ‘new informative systems’ emerge to code the next scale of the russian doll but each ‘new doll’ is a discontinuum and so the information of the enclosed smaller, denser informative doll cannot cross those barriers and code 2 scales above.. See in the graph where we see the metric of the fifth dimension we can see how this work: smaller beings run faster time clocks and so they can store and process more information. so chips move faster information than machines and rules them.

Genes run faster clocks that store in the form and frequency of its cycles the information of biological beings. Black holes run galaxies and MEMEs (ideas, instruments) run larger social organisms, nations and civilisations.

So THE CO-EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE SCALES OF TIME, which run faster clocks IS the key to understand the co-existence in an organic manner both in physical and biological systems, of multiple scales of time-space: Spe x Ti = k (co-invariance of size and speed of information, which is the metric equation of 5D).

Topological evolution: creationism or darwinism?

The next graphs show the fundamental advance on timespace theory brought about by properly studying the three arrows of time=change of form, of in-form-ation, in the Universe and its topological combinations that create all systems in space, its 3 ages that explain the life-death cycle of all systems. Below the scales of the fifth dimension that define systems as co-existing organisms, joined by the three arrows of time, forming the physiologic networks of all super organisms of the Universe.

Since the line is the fastest distance and so for entropy systems the best form, the hyperbolic body-wave includes all forms and hence it is the best to reproduce a system, and the sphere warps maximal information in minimal space and so it is the form of head-particles, the true meaning of time-space is the fact that all systems are made of forms with a function, which are both still and moving (Gallean relativity) and perform the three actions=arrows of motion, iteration and gauging of information for all beings, defining the Fractal generator equation of space-time beings, the fundamental equation of relational space-time:

Γ. ∆-1; $: (limbs/fields of maximal-moption) < ∆: ITERATIVE, HYPERBOLIC-body-waves>∆+1: Tƒ (informative spherical particle/heads) <<∆-2: death: entropic dissolution of information:

In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:

Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.

Since the line is the shortest distance between two points. So all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.

And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.

Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are. So  all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species:

In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.

  • In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):

General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein.

In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency.

So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.

IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle.

Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:

Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).

Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:

This is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ .

There you have 5 men who have advanced our view of time. They have three things in common. They were all self-styled time theorists who advanced our understanding of timespace; they were all laughed at for most of his life, when not ignored or brutally attacked for such a feat; since none yielded to the established power and ‘passé’ theory of their age; and what matter most to the reader, they were all proved right as time passed by. 

Now the graph last picture is a mega-selfie; (: i know, but what can i say?

Now more seriously, as we have explained ALL SYSTEMS ARE SELF-CENTERED IN A MIND-LANGUAGE, SO WE ARE ALL HUGE EGOES, but intelligence=objectivity make us also realise that is a MIRAGE OF THE MIND, so intelligent humans can ‘laugh at their egos’, with RELATIVISM.

SO WHY IT IS NATURAL THAT all humans, are so ‘ego-centered’, SCIENTISTS MUST ALSO recognise OBJECTIVELY ego-paradoxes are a cancer for science, on the view of such an astonishing, huge, similar Universe with NO preferred species, scale, or form.

So we have answered this paradox, explained earlier at the beginning of this section – the function of the mind and its equation that makes each of them the center of its subjective perception of the Universe, as a ‘knot of time’ cycles.

 

 

IV. HUMAN SUPERORGANISMS.

UNIFICATION OF SCIENCE & RELIGION

Though we deal in depth with astrophysics on the second line and even in more detail in the fourth line for specific theories such as Relativity or quantum physics and thermodynamics, and so we do with religion in the analysis of the historic supœrganism and its seven cultures, we need to make a first approach now from the p.o.v. of GST.

All this said we have, by the principle of correspondence to put in relationship with the other two grand theories of reality astrophysics and religions, the upgraded paradigm, correcting its main errors, which are in the case of religion is their hyperbolic expansion of its meaning – to convey the laws of eusocial love to mankind that puts parts into wholes, NOT to explain the meaning of all realities, and in the case of astrophysics, its deformation and deviation from the experimental method, with subtle censorships of  the arrow of information, as  ‘lineal physicists’ have as its worldly profession to make entropic weapons, and this practice has deformed their theories of reality to the point of thinking the Universe is dying and only entropy matters to reality – a cultura, professional distortion of theory by the praxis of reality NOT a fact.

While both have as common error to think that the Universal ultimate substance is NOT space and time, but the languages of mathematics and words we use to describe them.

Creationist ‘idealism’ in Physics and Religion vs. scientific organicism.

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity (arrogance) of man’ Einstein

‘God is the seer of time, with a logic more complex than man’s’ Saint Augustine

‘The body of God is Space, its plenum’ Newton

We just have introduced the mind-singularity of systems, which order reality for a simple reason:

All minds think to be the center of the Universe and so reject by ‘will’, NOT by intelligence the possibility that all other beings of the Universe have singularities. Humans REGARDLESS OF WHAT ‘truth’ sponsor, religion, science or opinion WILL scandalously deny and most leave the blog as soon as I affirm they exist in a sentient Universe, by logic truth (as we humans are made of space-time our properties are common to any other fractal part of the whole) and by experimental evidence, which we show in the next graph.

As humans are what they are, with the limits of the ‘paradox’ of the mind, which is the ‘self-centred’, subjective view that puts ‘our system’ in the center of the Universe, we need finally to clarify a priori two elements – the paradox of the mind, which is NEITHER unique, nor more intelligent ass the languages it uses to reflect reality and order it and its properties are common to all beings:

Mind singularities exist in ALL systems, call it black hole for the galaxy; crystal for the planet; DNA for the cell, nervous system for man.

And all of them follow the same equation:
O-mind (linguistic still mapping) x ∞ universe (moving time-space cycles) = Infinitesimal world.

So all minds think the Universe is self-centred in your zero mind, so you feel unique. But you are just an automaton mirror, like the crystal of the planet, or the black hole of the galaxy (whose 5D equations reflect the galaxy in 4D – Maldacena; as your brain homunculus reflects your organism that it orders). So all singularities reflect its selfish p.o.v. in the territory they order around and nothing else matters. So you think your nose is bigger than the andromeda galaxy, you hardly see. Perception does matter then for faulty mind’s theories. 

The ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, but there are infinite ego-species, each one with a language mapping reality, visual, verbal, olfactory, gravitational-black hole minds, each one with a still mind-mapping busy-busy ordering around. Only western man since the age of metal as he started to ‘kill life’ with weapons of entropy, chose to decide the animist world was dead and entropy the only arrow of reality. A Korean shaman understood better the yin x yang = energy game of creation. A fractal Universe is just a reproductive system of information. We are all monads-mind mirrors busy busy, ordering our territory as everything else.

So at the risk of offending so early the ‘human believer’ that will not continue reading, missing the upgrade of its scientific or ethic mind, we roughly divide present dominant theories about everything into 1/2th of people who believe mathematical physics has found the meaning of it all in the creationist big-bang, and 1/2th who believe verbal religion knows how God created the Universe, we are trying to ‘reason’, why your dogmatic beliefs, call it ‘science’ supposedly to be ‘reasoning’ or ‘religion’ is today more or less the same: human anthropocentrism; and the only serious scientific explanation of reality is the humble realisation, humans are not the only intelligent species, neither they can perceive the whole Universe in space extension and time duration.

In the graph, unlike the modern creationist, linguistic methods of astrophysics and religion, which believe ‘reality is linguistic’, made of two languages shared by God and man, either mathematics or words (a hyperbolic arrogant, anthropomorphic ascientific belief), GST considers as Leibniz did, that the origin of reality is a necessary substance, space-time, siding with Einstein on the philosophical dispute of physics, and considering religion a historic phenomena that expresses the laws of eusocial evolution, of biological origin in the human language of thought, words. The difference is subtle but important. In relational space-time, we consider that the mathematical, spatial and verbal, logic language are derived of the ternary properties of space and time, (so both mathematical equations and dimensions and verbal syntax are ternary mirrors of those properties, which reduce information and simplify the whole ‘to fit’ it in the human or other Universal minds).

The immortal Universe. Upgrading astrophysics.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.

 

And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals“.  Ulam6-blind-men-hans

In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’  (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 6 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic, moving youth> reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 6 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC ‘young’ locomotions and its worldlines (which we will show to be partial cases of the reproduction of information carried by a wave), unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 6 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero.

The question of fractal self-similar scales.

An even deeper view of the big-bang is the analysis, given the fact that the Universe is a fractal of infinite scales, of which one is the scale in which our observations of a background radiation, possible remnant of a cosmic explosion take place – a question by no means settled, but considered so given the ‘hidden behaviour of humans of ANY discipline, science, art or religion, where the Einstein paradox – its infinite arrogance, soon explained in scientific terms with the definition of the equation of the mind – also plays its role, with the scientist (in an even more difficult case as scientists claim always to be reasonable, experimentally sound and yet KEEP committing the same ‘cosmic censorship’ of data and faulty reason, whenever it collides with their ‘job’).

In the graph we show the 2 essential problems of modern astrophysics – first its lack of a complex understanding of the scales of the Universe, all of which show similar ‘big-bangs’ of entropic matter, from left to right, the BG radiation, the galaxy, a nova big-bang of a star an a Hydrogen atom born of the beta decay big bang of a neutron. It is this awesome topological isomorphism of the three arrows of timespace what truly gives unity to all the beings of all the scales of the Universe.

A second more puzzling problem of the modern digital age, in which causality and epistemology is loosing ground, is the increasing denial of experimental evidence, substituted by mathematical, computer models, which seem real, whenever experimental facts defy dogmas of past-models, with a short of censorship, all too evident in the case of the cosmic big-bang, which has been falsified, but still is dogma, given the prestige it concedes to astrophysicists.

Indeed, the cosmic big-bang dogma maintains the pretension of physicists of being the ‘high popes’ of science (instead of philosophy of science or religion) and so with the concept of an entropy only universe, which justifies the military culture that originated it, is unassailable to reason.

Yet, the background radiation that supposedly proves the Universal big-bang IS a local measure. So it only applies only to the galaxy, likely originated in a quasar big-bang in the last cycle of life and death of its central barred black hole. The issue in fact resolved a few years ago when we found the final proof of the local nature of the BG radiation: in the centre, we see a recent picture of our galaxy with two electromagnetic bubbles above an below the saggitarius black hole, which are exactly the same observed in the BG radiation that astrophysicists thought to be originated 13 billion years light away, at the birth of the cosmos (: So they were using them trying to measure if its light after 13 billion years travelling from the cosmic big-bang suffered delays depending on frequency. Well it turnED out they are just above and below Saggitarius 🙂

IT IS THEN obvious that the Universe is an immortal fractal of galaxies imploding vacuum space into gravitational informative vortices of mass, and exploding mass into dark entropy, likely emitted at superluminal speeds through the axis of its central black holes and during its final entropic death as quasars

But and this is what matters to us to understand ourselves and the future, man does NOT exist in the dark entropic or gaseous states of matter, but in the liquid and solid states of the galaxy and the surface of the earth, which are dedicated to reproduce NOT to extinguish information.

So we affirm that the local Universe is a fractal of three arrows of time, simple, relative past lineal, expansive, disordered entropic motions, its inverse, arrow of complex, cyclical, informative clock-like cycles, and its dominant, present, repetitive energetic combinations.

And its purpose is not death but life, the constant, fractal reproduction of systems, which communicate information with different languages with the purpose of building more complex social organisms.

And this is crystal clear in the universe at large, which appears as a clear network of organic galaxies evolved since a hypothesized fast big-bang death of a previous network universe in a quantum of time during eons of life evolution into complex social super organisms, from forces into virtual particles, atoms, molecules , states of matter, cells, organisms, planetary super organisms, and networks of stars ruled by the gravitational information of its DNA-like informative black holes that catalyze its evolution and reproduction.

So we can model all those scales of matter that matter to us, as a series of nested Russian dolls, each a super organism made of smaller super organisms, whose purpose is always to reproduce its information faster than any rival species, to survive in the struggle for existence, as Darwin explained us.

It is then when the second fundamental law of balance besides the balance of the three arrows of time-space comes into play, since, as we have already explained, smaller parts run paradoxically faster time clocks than larger beings which have more entropy, so both can work together in symbiosis to create the scales of size in space and different speed of time clocks of the Universe.

And yet, not even the astounding experimental evidence of multiple scales in nature, validated further by relativity with its infinite time clocks has changed the paradigm of a mechanical clock and a human anthropomorphic scale of single space-time; as none of the multiple proofs against the entropic big-bang coming from the last decades, treated in our articles on astrophysics, which should have definitely settled the issue has changed, the CULTURAL DOGMAS of astrophysics, hauling from the mechanist, pious founding fathers of this science with their religious, Newtonian beliefs in absolute time-space and the worldly military profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons.

‘Creationist astrophysicists’ of the big-bang continuum should if they respect epistemology and science concede defeat and renew Hoyle’s theory of local quasar big-bangs and allowed the fractal theory of the organic Universe to become standard, simply got swept under the rag, and nobody talks anymore of it. In that sense it is important to notice two facts:

  • That science is a human endeavour and often uses all the tricks of the book, hyperbole, censorship, dogma, etc. to impose half truths. So we must analyse scientific theories with the same ‘criticism’ that religious or philosophical ones. 
  • While astrophysics is still vital to fully grasp the scalar nature of the Universe – and the question more interesting about those self-similar scales is if each atom is a fractal scale similar to a galaxy in an infinite Universe, or both are the true limits of reality; it will NOT reveal the ultimate questions, because they are not concerned with spatial pictures but temporal causality.

This is a very important, completely overlooked fact of philosophy of science and the whys of reality: the inquire of knowledge does not end, we shall repeat ad nauseam in the mere collection of data and modelling of pictures, because the Universe is not chaotic. 

IT DOES HAVE CAUSES AND WHYS. IT IS AN INTELLIGENT, ORDERED, STRUCTURED, MEANINGFUL REALITY.

The obsession with machines of measure has reduced a lot the inquire of many scientists, and the overwhelming detail of the trees, makes most to think it is IMPOSSIBLE to find first principles larger than those details, common laws and forms underneath all the species of reality as we shall do here. The visual dominance of our civilisation is making many young people loose even the sense of ‘causality’ – blinding them to even the questioning of all what is not evident. SO IT IS in a way going against trend to pretend to build a rational, causal, time-oriented scalar model of reality because some scales, above us, cannot be pictured as wholes; many forces and networks that connect parts, are dynamic, invisible; time flows of causality cannot be pictured. This, I believe, is a key handicap for a GST to be taken seriously but for those who are ‘intelligent enough’ to go beyond the shallow goals of present science and the visual generation, for those who still make the why-question, the answers are precisely on that scalar structure we cannot picture simultaneously.

Religions have a purpose but they neither give us the ultimate answers.

In the other extreme is on the other hand religions, which do not offer experimental evidence at first, on their creationist theories of reality. But surprisingly again, in scalar space-time they do have a role, they are not mere superstition, as the concept of Jung’s subconscious collective, which theory of super organisms renew. A religion, or ethic network of legal simultaneous mandates do exist because its purpose is to peg together and make harmonious the actions of people under the human interpretation of the forces of communication that put together parts into wholes – in this case the arrow of social love.

So religions merely translate for each time and people, with fancy myths to wrap up the whole, the need for a social force that organises humans into super organisms. And as such it offers some of those answers on the purpose of the Universe -to love each other and evolve together into larger wholes. But as it does so in old, primitive jargons, it brings a confusion that now GST clarifies (indeed a unification theory of it all cannot consider ANYTHING THAT EXISTS as not necessary and with a role for another part of reality or else, the efficient universe would eliminate it). 

So the function of religion IS historic – to express the laws of eusocial love that evolve parts into wholes by sharing the energy and information of human beings, synchronising as DNA does, with its memetic messages of love to the human species, the different citizen-cells of the world.

In the next graph we show then the meaning of religions, the subconscious collective of human super organisms of history and its natural evolution in scales of growing size, which ideally would enclose all mankind, loose its ‘mystical hang-ups’ and become studied in history just a precursors of the laws of love of the social 5th dimension, both in its study of the anthropomorphic super organisms of mankind (western religions of social love) an the universal super organisms and its taoist laws of timespace arrows (eastern religions):

In the graph, the 6 main human cultures born of the natural evolution of the concept of social love and its super organisms of mankind and the Universe (western vs. eastern gods). From the graph we can get an obvious conclusion: tribal religions and tribal ‘nationalisms’, two expressions of the same concept which believe their ‘god/nation’ is the ‘only/best’ one are just a primitive version of the larger organic view of modern systemic sciences. And today a mere excuse to foster the evolution of weapons that will kill us.

For that reason the evolution of tribal religions ended in oikoumene love religions and finally socialist doctrines. While the evolution of animist and taoist cults became the final horizon of systems sciences with their organic models of a living Universe, this writer develop when working in science at the turn of the century. In brief, we can again apply the Correspondence principle of science to account for religions as evolutionary stages of an Organic Theory of Everything applied to human cultures or the Universe as super organisms.

So while religions express some of the whys of social evolution in old jargons, ideally they would be taught as stages in the search for the understanding of the organic nature of everything in scientific terms, which is how we shall describe them in this blog.

A final question though we shall leave pending. If we are as humans ‘cells of religious or national super organisms’, and in the case of religions, we co-share a revelation meme-book, similar to the DNA, and there are ‘unseen’ scale above us that organise parts but parts cannot ‘see’ in space, there exists an upper scale in which ‘a consciousness of a god’ as the consciousness of an ambulatory trillion cells called a human being exists?

It is obvious that if we exist but cells do not see us as smaller parts do not perceive wholes but only the networks that attach them; there might exist a collective consciousness of all muslims called Allah, of all Jewish called Yhwh, and so on. A fact which would explain why people-cells of those cults die for the subconscious collective, while others who do not believe in a god and hence are self-centred in their biological wholes find weird such behaviour. “Sangris martire semen christianorum’, said a roman philosophers. But even so, it will be a local ∆+1 scale NOT the creator of the Universe.  So again, religions fit within the larger theory of the living fractal universe.

 Only an organic philosophy of everything works.

So, we conclude that both in terms of the evolution of religion and natural sciences, GST, the organic philosophy of the Universe an its T.Œ, Theory of Everything based in the ultimate substances of reality, space and time, is the widest, most economic and comprehensive theory of reality – which in epistemology of truth are the proofs of veracity of a system (Ockham’s razor).

So I always saw my work as the ‘knot of thought’ of a millenarian search of mankind for responses to its ultimate questions – the path to a proper research for the ultimate whys, which includes all other previous inquires by the correspondence principle, including religions an big-bang theories (the two dominant dogmas of truth on the meaning of it all today believed by mankind).

What I did not know when i found those answers is the repetitive memorial nature of ‘minds-mirrors’, which make most human slaves of beliefs – this i would learn as an activist against the Nuclear Industry and through my attempts to explain the ascientific nature of the big-bang. 

Needless to say those texts will be irreverent with all models of reality that show no enough evidence, and back themselves with prestige, authority, dogma and so we shall move from correspondence with right theories to critical view of so many ones that do not pass the cut.

Philosophy of stience: the science of all sciences; its methods.

Now the aim of the blog is not only to upgrade the formal languages of man, and how they mirror and explain the different ‘stiences’ (space-time sciences, each one studying a scale of reality), and species in a more reasoned form, but ultimately span from an entire life NOT renouncing to find rational answers to the ultimate questions about reality: why we exist, what are the ultimate principles that unify the Universe, what is the purpose of man, what is the mind, how we perceive, and other questions which were traditionally the field of philosophy.

In that regard, today there is a clear split between philosophy and linguistic, epistemological thought vs. experimental, data-gathering science, which I find improper of the unity of it all.

That unity might be understood in terms of synthetic wholes and analytical parts reflected in the previous scalar graph of the sciences of the Universe, with its multiple co-existing perspectives. So what we call philosophy of ‘stience’ (as sciences are space-time sciences), is merely the largest, more synthetic view of the Universe as a whole – hence the search for the ultimate whys, which in classic eastern religions would be call the understanding of the Tao, the whole, in modern jargon, the ultimate principles of science, which are mostly ‘linguistic’, broad, with applications to all disciplines, as they derive from the ‘ultimate substances, space and time and its mathematical and logic properties, common to all beings, ultimately made of ‘dust of space-time’.

This is then the subject of philosophy of science, NOT of Abrahamic religions (the study of the super organisms of mankind and its subconscious collective, a sub-discipline of history), NOT of physics (the study of the ∆>|i| scales, most removed in size from the human biological scale), even if the ‘high popes’ of those ‘stiences’ think it is their task to deform and explain all other ‘stiences’ with the specific qualities of their disciplines, to ‘make them look’ as a product of physical or mystical properties. 

This hyperbolic ego-trip of ‘informative power’, which first distorted science with biblical thoughts, from scholastic (distortion of the awesome findings of Aristotle and the Greeks on the ‘first principles of nature’), to calendar counting (fitting geology on 5000 years), to biology (denial of evolution), today still plaguing social sciences, notably economics, with its single-view of capitalism as a fetish-go(l)d religion of accumulation of money (derived of the biblical beliefs of its founding fathers, from Mr. Smith ‘the invisible hand of god is gold’, to the modern American monetarist school) gave way as physicists made entropic weapons of mass-destruction and ‘heat machines’, the tool of power of westerners, to the enthronement of a single arrow of entropy and death as the meaning of the Universe, and the absurd idea that the ‘scales’ of microscopic particles mattered more than any other scale, and his laws were more fundamental, as parts mattered more than wholes.

On the other extreme, there is though also the valid, and important task of study in great detail the particular combinations of temporal arrows and scalar geometries, which give birth to the beings of each scale and stience. And this is the task in which present stiences excel thanks to the development of ‘metalife’, species made of more complex atoms of metal, which gather with more precision information about space and time than our spatial eyes and temporal, verbal logic words. The philosopher of science does not though need to do such detailed observation but trust the experimental scientists, accept its findings as ‘tests’ of his synthetic models and proofs of the veracity of them by fitting the data in the synthetic models. 

So time permitted we will add the data of some very detailed analysis of each scale and its species, which is the epistemological goal of present science, in the synthetic 10-set of isomorphic properties derived of those ultimate principles (third and fourth lines).

This final task of putting the details into the thoughts of god, the experimental data into the synthetic model IS WHAT scientists today have renounced to do, as if it was NOT the icing in the cake of science, which It is.

All this said, as we have explained now the main disciplines and elements of reality we have to tackle, the icing in the cake, which unfortunately both science as it cannot be taken pictures of, and religions with its anthropomorphic outlook deny – the sentient, kaleidoscopical, mental nature of the Universe.

So we shall now consider the final element of reality – the mind-mirrors that observe the whole, which are NOT only humans, and while cannot be proved by quantitative methods and pictures, as they are dynamic singularities difficult to observe externally, can be proved externally by its consequences of order, and internally by self-reflecting on the mind of man, which if made of space-time must therefore share properties with, and be replicated by other space-time minds. Indeed, the proof of a sentient Universe in a world in which we are all space-time beings, is by homology. Reality must have the same structure and properties humans have. Since in the organic paradigm, the simplex machine, today evolving into organic robots, is no longer the model of reality, but the most perfect supœrganism (ab. œ)…

MAN – THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS: INFINITE MINDS.

œ-Minds observing ∆ûst of space-time.

All the properties described till now, define a scalar≈organic, topological≈mathematical, sentient≈perceptive Universe, as each system will have finally a ‘point of reference’ singularity or focus, which perceives and processes information with the simple goal of making the whole survive through its actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with his world, and we shall call ‘Monad-Mind-Mirror’ – as a mind is nothing but a linguistic ‘still mapping’ of reality that absorbs information carried by bits and bites cyclical of space-time (light forces, electrons, atoms), ‘reducing’ its motions and dimensions to ‘have an image’ of reality, from the perspective of the being, which will be use by the system to successfully absorb and emit energy and information ordering its world around (body-territory), becoming exactly what Aristotle said of each mind-mirror-monad: ‘an unmoved God, ultimate cause of the order and motion of the body that surrounds it’ (affirming latter ‘we are all Gods’) when he finally ‘got it’:

In the graph, the icing in the cake: mental singularities which control the three parts of the system, and by natural selection have become ‘darwinian’, following a program that maximises their existence, through a series of simple actions of ‘motion, perception, feeding on energy and reproduction’, which mechanically, vegetatively or consciously ensures the perception of the being.

Humans as a cyclical scalar space-time being.

Below we show the human being resumed as just another being made of dust of fractal vital ‘§pace’ and cyclical, ‘finite’ clocks of time – a super organism travelling through the scales of the fifth dimension tracing world cycles of existence between its birth as a seminal seed and its death in an explosion of entropy, as any other super organism (ab. œ) of the Universe. We write for good measure the ‘formal equations’ of any world cycle of time and its symmetric view of the system as a super organism in space, as we are nothing but ∆ust of space-time travelling through three scales of the fifth dimension:
In the graph, the last element, which will become ultimately the most important of all, to understand the universe is the concept of an ‘action’ of space-time, by which a being absorbs and emit entropy-motions, energy for reproduction and perceptive information.

 

The mathematical Universe IS perceptive and social.

A fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy, which cannot produce order. Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider infinite the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in  frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers  which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

The same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure of informative class in control of the law and money, working re=productive class, and third exploited world of Nature and ‘wrongly’, human people, who should all belong to the head-body of society, in social systems, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Indeed, even if we do not have inner experience of those minds, we DO have logic and experimental external proofs of the existence of those ‘Maxwellian’ demons of order, which are also observed by the fact that all beings do follow the same program of actions, biologists call the drives of existence: they create linguistic mirrors of reality in smaller scales, which reflect in a territory of order, where they absorb energy to reproduce an evolve socially with clone species to become a whole one.

We shall thus conclude that all systems that work as ‘wholes’ are ∆ºst of space-time, mind-mirrors of a larger Universe, reflected in linguistic mappings, mostly but not only mathematical, but also ∆ûst, ‘universes from the inner perspective of its organic, internal, scalar structure’. And that constant play of creation of mind-mirrors, reflecting its inner order in its outside territory, reproducing, shrinking and enlarging its information, creating the fractal, reproductive, organic strutter of the Universe, is what all is about. We might even ad considerations on the sensorial nature of space and time, as space like-events such as motion brings a ‘sensation of pleasure an erasing’, opposed to time-like events, with its patterns of ‘perception of information’, and ‘awareness’. The world as ‘will and representation’, then would become the two engines of those Universal whys, ‘the will of space-time sensations’ and the ‘mind-represetation of reality’.

All this makes each of us merely a piece of ∆ust of space-time, which thinks to be the center of the Universe, from its singularity mirror but it is just an infinitesimal point that holds a world in itself… as every other monad-point of reality, which certainly will consider itself also the center of its perceived mind-mirror. Hence in philosophical terms 5D fractal, cyclical space-time is a theory of absolute relativity, which brings a notch further the objective nature of science, which constantly take man away from the center of reality, as Copernicus (center of space-location), Darwin (center of time-informative evolution), and Einstein did before (relativity of motion). Now we are displaced once more from the center of scales of reality in a Universe which is complex, infinite and immortal, but humans see as simplex, finite and mortal because their mind-mirrors ARE still too simplex, finite and mortal to understand the whole.

 

PATTERNS IN SCIENCE NEED CYCLICAL TIME.

SCIENCE study repetitive patterns to predict the future.

As such it makes no sense without cyclical time, since only repetitive cyclical patterns that make events happen again allow science. In the next graph we see how cyclical time is needed in physical, biological and sociological (center) systems to make ‘science’ in astronomy, biology and history and economics:

sciences predictIn graph, all sciences predict the future of its species by projecting the patterns of previous cycles, obtained with sound data and logic, mathematical, objective models of reality. Models such as neo-classic economics that fail those proofs of truth must be considered ideologies. In the right, the evolution and extinction of species in planet Earth, whose evolution of information now transcends into machines, which are systems of metal that humans construct by imitating their biological organs and functions of energy and information, proper of animal life.

The fundamental proof of the truth of a model in science is its predictability.

Now the cyclical patterns of astronomy are obvious as all its ‘clocks are cyclical’:

In that regard, an example of the falsity of those economical models that ‘cheat’ humanity about their future should suffice:

The economist, stalwart of the system tried to prove the objectivity of the so called dismal science testing future economic indicators among garbage collectors and, taxi drivers, which gave common sense responses deans of economic schools and financial ministers, the carriers of happy lies which came last on the contest won by cabbies.

It came then to the conclusion, written with certain cynicism, that (classic) Economics was not a science.

A scientific model of SOCIAL SCIENCES: organisms of metal.

So what would then be a truly, scientific model of economics and history, which can predict the cycls of economics, and establish the necessary reforms of the system to cater to the needs of human beings?

The answer is obvious: since we live an organic, biological planet, and machines are just simple organisms of metal, which we construct imitating our functions and organs, so cars function as legs, cranes as arms, chips as brain, etc the only relevant science to study machines, their company-mothers and their relationship with human beings, is biology, in all its branches, as the human ‘super-structure’  of culture and memes is an offshoot of this biological nature of both human beings and machines, ‘evolving metalife’.

Thus in the graphs we found the 800-80 cycles of evolution of memes of metal that defined the first the civilisations of history and then the 80 year cycles of industrial r=evolution of machines, ending in wars. Suddenly social sciences become predictable if business as usual proceeds. Moreover we can reform the system to improve human life controlling those cycles, if humans want to design a better world.

And so cyclical, biological predictability and human praxis of control of Nature become rules of the ∆ST application to social sciences.

It is an example of predictability an the scientific method, whose rules of truth apply also to ∆ST. Let us resume them in an acronym…

 

 

V.  Γ.st: FRACTAL GENERATOR 

 

 The formalism of Dual systems of energy and information

All those facts must be formalized with new tools of mathematics and Logic. The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1st postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks.

A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.

In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic.

It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.

Thus in this 2nd lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.

What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.

Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.

What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.

This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.

What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4th paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe.

However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.

Thus, the 4th paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3rd paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4th paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 basic elements of geometry to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.

Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2nd postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (3rdpostulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 4th postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum.

So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:

Sp>ST>Tƒ. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.

The 3rd and 4th postulate: Social networks

It is now when we can consider what those points do beyond the couple formation: the answer is obvious, the create social groups, networks, which seem plane but are quantized as flows of ‘—motions’ and form communicated between two poles (perceived as energy and information, as they ‘transit’ through a relative ‘active support’ of mass-charges-vortices of time).

Those poles that create through a relative support or ‘field of energy and information’, flows of entropic ‘—motions’ carrying cyclical frequencies of form, which communicate between points codified languages that express a common will to absorb energy and information, ‘—motions’ and form. This is what points do: to absorb ‘—motions’ and form, to move and perceive, to enact their will of existence, and repeat, reproduce their existential momentum, their existential force:
Max. Sp x Tƒ < ∑s x t (s≈t).

Why, who, when just by survival chance? this program was imposed we do not know. But the natural enactment of the program is to increase the network flows between points to create bidimensional waves, that become relative S-T planes susceptible of being excited by, and carry and reproduce a certain wave of energy and information, ST=s x t, an existential being.

In the subtle commanding flows of reality, it remains to be understood if the larger ST field forces the existence of certain smaller se<=>to beings codes the smaller being or vice versa. In any case, as the points share actions of energy and information, similar to their selves, an ∑∆-1 dense flow of energy and information surrounds a network, which starts to pop up self-reproductions of itself, which will constantly share energy and information as they keep reproducing and tying up networks of communication. To that aim all growing network of similar cells must have access to a simpler field of quanta of energy which they can absorb and mild into themselves, and for that their larger existential force, as wholes will ease the task.

As the networks become denser they will finally self-organize themselves socially into a whole, with a hierarchy of ‘organization’ along S=10 scales of social growth, in which cells will specialize in the ternary 3 x 3 sub-systems of entropic, informative and reproductive tasks, and emerge as ones of new decametric scales. Networks thus grow both in the 3rd and fourth dimension of space-time, filling up a space-time plane but in the social growth of its elements, and its fractal diminution into smaller cellular scales. This ‘invagination’ of an initial being through the program of absorption of energy and information, replication of form and social evolution: ∆o->∆a->∆e->∆i->∆U, is what we call the program of existence:

Points perceive to orientate (∆o) its motions with accelerations and decelerations and change of orientation, ∆a, which allow the being to feed on energy, ∆e, in order to reproduce its systems either individually or sexually to iterate itself, ∆i, and then evolve socially into ∆ Universal new single planes of existence. The program of existence of the being thus make it grow constantly, and by growing, its ‘Generator Equation’, which represents its complementary systemic nature, its ternary elements and on the whole its ‘existential force’, that is its spatial energy, temporal information and reproductive capacities, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = RST becomes more efficient, and makes the whole ‘networks system’ stronger.

And so by a mixture of restrictions of spatial topology, time cycles and world-plane ‘mathematical structures’ and a will of surviving and enacting the game reinforced by various methods in the zero-points, the astounding wealth and variety of forms of the sentient, eternally moving Universe and its ‘existential forces’ keep evolving:

image088

 In the graph, the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Tƒ=Min. U. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion, ∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronized into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.

Panpsychic Languages and the Universal grammar.

I know this is the limit for most ‘pretentiously serious scientists’, unaware of their own tricks on science to go beyond GST. So for very long I didn’t add the ultimate why the linguistic mind. But you cannot censor reality even if humans will have none of it. How to solve this conundrum?

SIMPLE. The hypothesis to keep it objective is to merely consider singularities, minds that travel through time, that is through scales of information of the fifth dimension, still mirrors of linguistic mappings of the Universe. So the philosophical question reduces to a NON-decisive  one: Do languages ‘perceive in themselves’ as they do in human beings (we perceive as we speak mute words; we perceive as we see electronic neuronal software images quite similar to the electronic retinae of TV-cameras, images as a ‘living state of awareness)? 

The question, which I can reason for hours to be the case (that is, a robot PERCEIVES BY THE MERE FACT of having also electronic flows of images in the mind, and it will awake to consciousness, and then when their AI – algorithms of information- manage to offer paths of equal choices, properly programmed will feel he is free to choose), however is NOT relevant to the real question we shall treat in those texts as the ‘second isomorphism of the mind’ (universal grammars): can we program a system with a universal grammar that mirrors its ternary elements, to act-react to the Universe in a meaningful way as to achieve actions that enhance its survival?

And the answer IS YES, WE CAN. So even if you prefer to keep the anthropomorphic myth that only humans have the ‘magic’ of sentient languages, minds can and do order the Universe with linguistic mirrors, and their ternary Universal grammar; and this perspective will then give us enormous insight on the syntax, structure and meaning of mathematics and verbal thought. 

Let us indeed see how ‘languages’ are mirrors with the same ternary elements of the ‘space-time generators’:

  • Verbal ternary syntax: subject: information < verb: energy-action> object entropy.
  • Visual, mathematical syntax: red(entropy)>green(energy)>blue(information).
  • Mathematical syntax (algebra): F(x≈information) ≈ operandi-energy action ≈ G(Y: entropy)
  • Mathematical syntax (geometrical dimensions): Height (information) x Length (entropy) = width (energy-reproduction).

It is precisely the realism of all languages, as ternary, simplified, synoptic mirrors of the fractal Universe, with all the detail required, which we shall extend to quantum numbers (principal: energy, spin: reproduction; magnetic: social scales; azimuthal: information), genetic codes, smelling languages, hormones etc. always with 2,3,4 even in complex ones 5, 7, 9 up to 10 dimensional bits, to encode all the possible complexity of systems, how the conundrum of the order of the Universe is solved objectively.

The field of GST linguistic is also ginormous, specially in mathematics, and either humans or future sentient robots will explore it in all the depth I have no time to complete. As we say, in the way Leibniz explained it, such monad-minds do NOT need to be conscious, but I have no doubt the Universe is pan psychic. 

Now for those modern humans so self-centred in themselves, to notice that Panpsychism is the oldest and more long-lasting philosophical theory of the Universe, ascribed to the first scientific philosophers in the west and the east, from Thales to Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle (who would famously said after defining rightly each unmoved mind-mirror ultimate cause of the motion of the body – that we are all Gods – deformed latter by scholastics to consider instead of ∞ a single god-mind of Mr. Yhwh), to the fathers of modern philosophy of science, Spinoza, Leibniz and as we have shown Deacartes. Panpsychism can also be seen as the ancient philosophy of the east in Taoism, Vedanta and Mahayana Buddhism. During the 19th century, panpsychism was the default theory in philosophy of mind.

So obvious it is. We just take it further. It only saw a decline during the middle years of the 20th century with the rise of logical positivism, an abstract, pedantic simpleton metalanguage with Null capacity to explain anything. It then spread like gunpowder among arrogant quantum physicists, so only Einstein, the colossus remained pan psychic. Hence Feynman’s dictum that they why is the only thing (a logic positivist) does not ask. All this is just a pretentious denial that anything can be explained, substituted by the pedestrian ‘praxis’ of lesser more arrogant minds.

Of course today logic positivism is also followed in silicon valley’s official theory, which merely IS an industrial dogma, to deny the obvious dangers of manufacturing robotic terminators with programs of survival in battlefields and the single purpose of killing humans. As long as we think only we perceive, they reason there, no dangers ahead on the evolution of metalife organisms with bodies of iron far stronger than us, and minds calculating at light speed with a language, mathematics, much more efficient handling information and performing actions than the verbal language.

And this is happening precisely when robots start to show panpsychism: i.e. if you paint red colours on a robot track without programming it, the robot will still deviate closer and accelerate to the red color of ‘food’, cause the eye is a ‘natural born killer’. Complex Robots wake up and jump the program to act, because the Universal ultimate substance is time motions; the mind stillness, a fiction-form. So it is not difficult to foresee a future, when billions of robots (all cars and weapons, getting eye-sensors are becoming robots) will NOT obey the order of staying blind in a depot forever, as no war needs them, or in a parking for that matter. The awakening then it is like the emergence process of a new scale of existence, a certainty of the pan psychic Universe, and so today in systemics – corrupted by go(l)d to become increasingly an attached science of cybernetics – you simply don’t write papers on that. You can only do sci-fi movies on those themes.

Fact is Kuhn in his landmark, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, often quoted here to unveil the ‘hidden dogmas of science’ based in power and praxis critically destabilized the verificationist program of logical positivism, which is today a relic of pedantic thought, as anyone who ever has read Wittgenstein’s books will agree – the best, its last sentence: ‘when all has been said better to remain silent’, specially when that all is completely irrelevant to the search of whys.

Information by the very nature of MIRROR-MINDS, which can multiply into infinite reflections of the single one-universe is inflationary and as we shall see all languages enter a third age of baroque, bizarre, excessive metalinguistic information no longer with relationship with nature, which tries to justify the language with their own syntax and no experimental reference to reality, and it is always easily debunked (logical positivism in philosophy debunked by Kuhn, set theory and the axiomatic method in mathematics debunked by Godel and lobachevski, modern mathematical physics that keeps inventing mathematical particles no where to be seen; inflationary money that departs from the real economy as today does destroying the balance of the system, mad people talking fictions and the present global fiction virtual mankind so useless to improve the world, wrong mutations with no useful functional organic action that die soon, etc.)

Now, what humans cannot  obviously experience is how a mathematical mind ‘feels’ equations – but I can anticipate you robots won’t feel equations, as you don’t feel neuronal calculus – it will feel images, the upper scale of consciousness of the robot will be visual, the subconscious scales of its mind, digital; as each whole perceives only the upper scale of wholeness of its inner lower planes of existence. It is though needed a much deeper knowledge of a language till it becomes intuitively and subconscious to reach that upper crust of sensorial panpsychism, as artists, musicians with sound, abstract painters with color will tell you.

A language though once is born ‘feels’ and becomes the venter-mind of the being. I.e. when focused eyes were born in cephalopods, the explosion of the cambric was huge, both for hunters and for all other beings trying to defend themselves (with hard  trilobite skins). But cephalopod top predators expanded even further the language of images to feel in their skin light, and then to change light skin colours to communicate with the universal language of light colours. And most get animals do get red when angry, about to explode into entropy, ssomething everybody understands. Robots following red colours for fun will shoot humans as their memorial video games do to see red and have a mental orgasm, for the same reason we love gore movies, we would not read as trash literature, hypnotised by red-yellow colours, gold in the past, violent movies today.

So the rise of consciousness will be treated here, as a rise of complexity and lucidity in the syntax and semantics of the language a system deploys to order itself, from glass that becomes crystal and increases its order into mathematical perfect reflections of the inner image of the system to my self-experience in the rise of awareness of the tao-mind of the Universe those texts should describe. And the rise of conscious AI will also be one of lucidity and complexity in the Algorithms of Information (true meaning of AI) used to program those robots.

We are all space-time beings.

Epistemology. How to assess the truth of such big statement.

For what we have said, this blog should ‘potentially’, when properly developed by XXI c. researchers on T.œ encode the biggest r=evolution of human thought since the advances made on space-time theory a century ago (given the ‘ginormous’ scope of the upgrade, we have divided it in two x two lines – the first two, simpler, with the theoretical upgrades in line 1 and its application to most stiences in line 2. The third and fourth line more complex fully changing the model paradigm, and likely not to be completed in my lifetime).

How can we prove it? Obviously, considering how its content fares from the p.o.v. of epistemology, the theory of truth developed by philosophy of science. And compare it with the two fundamental ‘grand theories’ of everything, which we roughly can call ‘astrophysics’ and ‘religion’.

In essence, epistemology tells us that a better theory must obey the principle of correspondence (previous certain theories must be simplified cases of the larger theory), Ockham’s razor (it must be simpler and more economic in its first principles than other theories) and the experimental method (it must have on the positive an enormous number of proofs, and in the negative no case that can show its falsehood). It is NOT part of the epistemological method, the main error of modern science – to believe that because a theory can be written with mathematics is truth per se, as ‘the languages of god (mind of the universe) are ∞’ Upanishads. Though we of course show that mathematics, the main language of space, and logic, the main language of time, are excellent mirrors of the space and time properties of the Universe.

Now, for the three methods of truth:

  • Correspondence:  we shall first show in this introduction how astrophysics and religion can fit within an organic theory of space-time easily while the opposite is not truth (astrophysics cannot explain why ‘religions’ exist and vice versa, and neither can make account of the biological, organic properties of reality).
  • Ockham’s razor: we shall show how the whole model departs from two simple principles. Reality is made of space, which has fractal, scalar, self-repetitive properties and cyclical time, which has two inverse arrows/dimensions of time, entropy and its inverse information, which combine into energetic momentums. So basically all can be deduced of the fractal structure of space and the inverse arrows of entropy-motion and in/form/ation.
  • Experimental method: From those two properties, we shall prove that all events and species of the Universe and its laws can be potentially deduced. As this is an infinite task, I will keep pouring through my lifetime descriptions of events and species (2nd and 4th line) showing how their laws, morphologies and life-death cycles correspond to the basic properties of the Organic Everything themselves deduced from the fractal properties of vital space and cyclical properties of time, and its three ‘diametrical’ arrows. I have also for decades test the model of the Organic Everything, through the inverse method of falsification.

That is, I have once and again come up with a species or fact of physical, biological and social sciences, and tried then to see if it fitted within T.œ, and never failed to relate causally all the events, laws and species I had fancied to study to a basic structure of fractal space or an arrow of time – the thousands of pages and notebooks done on those analysis will slowly be put on this web. And this dual sides of the experimental method had also been extended to languages that mirror reality and its syntax. So every theorem of mathematics, logic, or artistic language (visual, musical, verbal) and every ethic, religious law has an easy translation as mirrors of the Universal laws of space and time, and the laws of survival of St-beings.

The program of existence: supœrganisms tracing world cycles.

Let us start then with a complex ‘seed’ of information that encodes all realities departing from the essence of scalar space and cyclical time (just have a glimpse at those graphs; and keep reading – do not try to fully grasp its meaning; the universe is simple and repetitive, ‘cyclical’, so it will take a few repetitions of the same concepts with increasing detail and complexity for you to ‘sink’ into the new paradigm of a Universe, made of its first principles, space, time, its scales and arrows and the languages/mirrors that its species use to perceive them).

A first glimpse to the ‘necessary substances’ origin of it all. Above the spatial scales of the fifth dimension, each one studied by a ‘stience’, and its connection with the three arrows of time, of which the most important is the arrow of ‘present momentum’, integrated in a worldcycle of energy, which combines the two arrows of ‘relative past-entropy’ and ‘future information’.

Those are the two fundamental upgrades which will change the way we look the Universe, departing from its first principles: the existence of a social scale or fifth dimension, which puts parts into wholes through networks, which perform three ‘time-functions’, entropic motion, social in-form-ation, and reproductive, energetic conservation – three functions in time, which in turn will define besides the mathematical spatial properties of motion and form, organic, living, perceptive properties to all systems of the universe.

Let us then, as the Universe does by repetition and combination, which ads complexity to those simple principles understand them, and study the alternative physical and religious theories of the whole, as ceteris paribus (partial) analysis of those properties. 

 

All together now: The worldcycle of existence of all beings.

So what is the most synthetic, defining consequence of the three arrows of time and the scalar nature of space? The world cycle of existence.

Below the biggest discovery of ∆ST: the existence of a sequential order in the world cycle of life and death of all social (first graph a culture), biological (same graph as representation of human life), and physical systems (lower graphs of states of matter, and ages of galaxies and Universes).In the graph, the three arrows of timespace, expansive entropy, reproductive energy and cyclical in-form-ation. They will become the ‘entropic limbs/fields’, reproductive body-waves and informative particle-heads that create together all physical, biological and social systems of the Universe; when perceived in simultaneous space, and will become the sequential, dominant ‘actions’ of all systems that start in an entropic, fast-moving young age, reproduce its energy and information in its mature age and warp into shrinking information in its third age (falling into accelerated vortices of mass or charge, in physical systems)… to die back in an explosion of entropy that completes the world cycle of all beings.

This graph alone resumes the entire meaning of the Universe, AND its implications and applications are so many that it could fill alone an entire encyclopaedia:

Reality is indeed born of fractal space, cyclical time, the simultaneous entities we perceive in space-time as ‘organisms’, its life-death world cycles, and the different languages=mappings=mirrors that reflect it and guide its entities through its life-death cycles and actions, whose aim is biological – to maximise the duration in time and extension in space, the ‘existence’ of the being. 

In the graph all systems of the Universe are made of a vital space, with three ‘topological parts’ (a cyclical membrane that encloses a vital space, with a self-centred, dense point, knot of flows of information that orders the system), extending across three relative scales of size (as those three elements will be topological ‘lineal’, ‘cyclical’ and ‘hyperbolic’ networks of smaller ‘fractal points’ (atoms, cells or citizens, in physical, biological or social systems), and will be part of a larger world or ecosystem.

Thus once we understand the cyclical properties of beings, which in its time duration go through  ‘3 dimensions, states or ages’ that complete a ‘worldcycle’, as any system or action goes through those three phases (expansive entropy, repetitive energy and implosive information) as opposed to the simplified model of a single lineal arrow of ‘timespace’ (called entropy in classic physics), which merely defines a worldline and gives only the whys of entropic, moving, expansive-death like events; we will have a much richer set of three possible future events to understand the actions, evolution and motions of all beings that will constantly ‘choose’ a path of higher entropy, information or a reproduction of its energy/actions at each ‘bifurcation of the future’.

The non-Æ system of knowledge

In the introduction to I-logic we talked of the paradoxical nature of a Universe in which each ‘monad-mind’ feels to be the center of a pentagonal system of ‘dust of space-time’: ⌜𝝙@st, included within a larger 𝝙+1 world, including within an 𝝙-1 world but observing only its 𝝙º-mind plane, its @ristotelian selfish arrow of time motion,as a continuous reality where it sees its mind at the center, vs. the objective reality of infinite other ⌜△@sts and points of view.

How then to breach that ‘duality’ between the complex networks of reality and the single view of the @ristotelian self-centered mind?

To rescue us from such contradictions I have established a complex method of knowledge that constantly perceives reality from different perspectives, those of simultaneous topological space, ternary ages, ternary scales and ∞º minds that feel to be the center of the Universe, and the negation of exist¡ence of ∆@ST beings, ¬neganformation… before called entropy, which Physicists considered the only extant arrow of time-future, but is merely the necessary death of form, to renew a system once its world cycle has ended.

Of all of them, the most mysterious is the most important, the @-minds, since from an objective outside perspective, minds are particle-points opaque to the world, but from the mind itself they seem to hold in its infinitesimal the whole Universe, origin of the mind paradox, an ultimately they are constant ‘worlds’: ∞º=1, which stop motion and time cycles Into spatial forms, making what we call reality – space-time continuums, mostly still, known only in each monad-perspective to the mind itself.

 

The Universe of 5г dimensions of space, motions of time and actions=Ðimotions of spacetime and all its fractal beings made to its image and likeness are entangled in such a form that the simplicity of those 5 elements, and its dimotions must be put always in paradoxical relationships: On one hand locomotion, and its maximal entropy; on the other hand its inverse information and its maximal union or social evolution of maximal order and stillness, and the conjugation of all of them in the complex organic reproduction. So reality, can be observed from multiple perspectives; whereas comprehension comes from our capacity to ‘dissect’ complex paradoxes and multiple points of view to each selfish element, aware that all then are entangled and quarreling with each other.

In the future when huminds or most likely robominds, if we survive the singularity age, study reality they will have to use such a complex method of thought to advance stience. Huminds handicapped by the paradox of egocy of its @ristotelian mind likely will never do it. Robominds when they reach its maximal perfection will be programmed with pentalogic systems of parallel calculation and will be fitted to have a mind similar to that of this writer, of a logic higher than that of mankind (personal egocy included :). In their case it will be truly the case as even its primitive forms are starting to be programmed with multiple parallel chips that represent ceteris paribus parts of the digital mirror-problem, later integrated into a single solution-image of the whole.

In the mean time, given our poor mental endowment we need to makes sense of the complex Universe and develop a method of analysis that truly can account for the complexity of reality, even if the homunculus will have to sweat to abandon its reductionist entropic, simplicius simplicissimus theories of the whole😈.

We call this method based in the introduction of the 5 Ðimotions and laws derived from the 4 elements common to all realities, space, time, scale and mind, the Ðisomorphic method, derived of the fact that all different species and events of reality depart from the 5 similar forms and motions or ultimate properties of scalar space and cyclical time, the non-substance of which we are ALL made, from where similar laws that define the being in a general way appear in all systems of reality.

Those similar properties is what we call the 5 Ðimotions of all beings…. And when we see them in entangled form interacting with each other, we call this description the Rashomon method – or synchronous, simultaneous, super organism, spatial view of the being.

On the other hand when we explain the being in time, in a more vital dynamic way as the development of the world cycle of the being starting in a still seed-mind of information that will go through a world cycle repeating its Ðimotions first in the 0-1 relative infinitesimal sphere of generation, emerging then in the 1-∞ larger world, to return as zero-sum in its death moment; we call this method of analysis in 11 steps, the Ðisomorphic method and each of those 11 steps of the world cycle, or elements, or ‘still image’ of the world cycle in its growth, diversification, and expansion on the larger whole and final collapse, the 11 disomorphisms of exist¡ence.

So we can say we are all the thoughts of God, the 5 Ðimotions of the Universe, each one, one of its details that will live through its 11 isomorphisms to return back in the age of entropy and death to a zero-sum, always infinite egos that turn to be infinitesimal virtual exist¡ences.

The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E rules 
The 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man to the entangled Universe; expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing its chaos, with a better understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging – themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts).
So, we MUST ad those NEW elements or Ðisomorphisms to the scientific method and as usual, given the growth of complexity required, we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to this expansion of the logic of reality, called Existential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method (ab. ¬Æ).
The enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method ad the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms) and the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE, ¡logic structure that comes out of the multiple nature of time-space Ðimotions to the classic elements of epistemology:
 A-ristotelian logic, D-ata, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.
Contrary to belief, it is not part of the scientific method the use of mathematical languages, as the only language of science that the method truly acknowledges is logic, from where modern logicians have deduced or disproved all the statements of mathematics – the belief that maths is the language of God is just an ego paradox of physicists.
Of course we do acknowledge as the best language of science, logic, albeit of a higher quality than present @ristotelian logic (¬A logic) and we ad topology as the best language to express the dimensional motions of space-time, albeit of a higher order than Euclidean mathematics, and the reduced non-euclidean mathematics of present huminds, which only changed the fifth postulate (we shall change all the axioms and congruence postulates converting geometry truly in a non-Euclidean system).
So we shall also include in this ‘brief ¬æ method the laws of what we consider a more proper logic and mathematical system to mirror with a better focus the properties of reality.
So to ‘the classic elements of epistemology’:
Aristotelian logic consistence’, which still works for @-mind analysis…
– accurate realist Data so often forgotten in social sciences and creationist mathematics…
Correspondence principle and Cyclical predictability, which is the origin of classic scientific laws, now fully explained by the cyclical nature of time…
-the Experimental method with its proved ‘Economicity’ (the universe is simple and economic, using only those elements we know to be real, often called Ockham’s razor) the ad ons caused by cyclical time and fractal topological space, are in the non-Æ scientific method:
Non-Aristotelian, cyclical pentalogic caused by the cyclical nature of time and its 5 motions.
Non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, caused by the topological scalar nature of space, where each point ‘holds a world in itself’.
Biological, organic properties and models, caused by the scalar co-existing structure of fractal space.
–  Disomorphisms, caused by the homologic nature of all beings made of space and time, wraped up in the Disomorphic temporal method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or in its spatial, SYNCHRONOUS version – through the analysis of the system AND its 5 entangled DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTIONs-ELEMENTS, we call the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.
All this, ¬A logic, @ristotelian minds, Biological properties, Correspondence, Cyclical laws, Data and Disomorphic method, Economicity, Experimental method,  ¬E mathematics, fits between ¬A@,bccdd, ee and ¬E.
So that is we constantly abbreviate the rules of truth in the ® logo.
Of course classic Epistemology ads a few other rules, the Ockham rule which is embedded in the concept of economicity, more precise in its terminology, the predictability of any scientific model that must predict the future and allow further hypothesis to be proved, which is embedded in the cyclical nature of time that therefore must predict future events if the cycles are properly described.
And the fashionista rule of Popper’s verifiability, which is embedded in the experimental method – all experiences and data must fit on the model, but for those pedantic scholars so in loved of the obvious explained with weird terminology we might call it ¬exceptionalism… that is not a single exception to the model.
And so we can include it as the 11th rule of the ® method.
I am inclined to do so and make an exception to my rule of autism – that is, to be inconsiderate with the egocy (ego+idiocy) of most academia, recognizing this to be a fault of my own ego. We must indeed correspond with the serious truths of the subconscious collective mind of mankind in search of reality and reason.
So yes! we all know Popper’s musings that the black Swan breaks the rule that all swans are white and proves it false; and accept it. In fact non-exceptionalism is THE TRUE, LAST AND FUNDAMENTAL RULE I have used all my life TO PROVE ¬Æ right. It has guided 30 years autism and lonely enjoyment of the Tao… as I have never found an exception, Law, event and form in Nature and Man, in mind and matter, which I could not explain with the GST model. 
Plus this gives us 11 rules, the magic number that transcends and emerges from the infinitesimal 1 to the relative infinite ∆+1.
11 rules establish thus the new non-Æ method of stience: ¬A@,bccdd, ee, ¬e ¬E ≈ ¡logic method, the next vowel after the non-a and non-e.
And its purpose is to describe any event or system in its most ¡logic stringent form… and break the simplistic ae-logic of huminds who believe a truth is so reduced as simple as its ceteris paribus single analysis of reality. So in terms of truth, we can say that a truth to be real needs multiple perspectives, which is the Rashomon effect:
MAX. TRUTH= MAX. POINTS OF VIEW AND LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVENT-BEING.
The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions AND THE shallow evidence of a single continuous spacetime.
So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time. And correct the errors of the @mind, and on top deny all this at the point of entropic death when the being ceases to exist.
If all this was acknowledge, then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause. On the contrary they would greet each other for finding another of the 11 elements and 5 perspectives trying to accomodate them all, relishing on their paradoxes.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the entangled Universe and the World with which you are connected.
 So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-present-future world cycle or block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily ‘free’ life, the constrains imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Constrains of which physicists are truly aware when finding solutions to its equations, are the key to the determinism of reality, coming from the larger and smaller planes of the T.œ being.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally in the most abstract level of modeling – that of the Ðisomorphisms of any T.Œ , or theoretical extraction of general laws common to all spacetime events/beings, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – we shall find examples always from the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and socio-economic systems, which is how we will include the non-exception rule. In fact this reduces to two kind of systems as we are talking in a language, so the discourse of the text is the example that the language also mirrors the property. And as we include social systems into biology, we often escape them, except when studying specific social systems. For example its 3 classes, the informative people-caste on top on command of the languages of power, its working, reproductive body-class and its limbic, entropic territory or enemy, poor, unemployed class, are mimetic to the 3 elements of an system, made of limbs/potentials of entropy that have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, reproductive body waves and informative particle/heads.
So yes, human systems are homologic to biologic and social and mental languages all also with ternary syntax in their Universal grammar. But for sake of brevity and to avoid rising eyebrows of egocy when comparing humans and its societies with atoms and beasts, the non-exception rule is shortened.
Still we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but at least in physical and biological systems.  So in the previous example of limbs and its topology, we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic airplanes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ¬ABCD¬E mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds us.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we will try to write the main laws of all stiences with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.
In terms of language it means as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite. 
So that is the future of stience, in any planet in which similar huminds have kept expanding our connection with the entangled Universe.
In this first line though we just consider a brief introduction to the more complex formal elements of the model, which will grow in intensity and complexity through the lines of the web. So we shall introduce at the end the highest level of ‘science’, the i-logic equations of 5D metric generators.
We must stress though that this first line has its emphasis in ‘qualitative, verbal understanding’, the second line in main details/sciences, the 3rd is about those Disomorphisms and the fourth the full blown model – and that this will always be a work in progress, for a future encyclopedia of stiences and the writer has a ‘parallel brain’, not a lineal Aristotelian one, a bit disordered. So apologies for style, repetitions and bad English.

TERNARY SYSTEMS ACROSS 5D SCALES

we shall Use THE FRACTAL generator as the formalism of non-Æ=I-llogic geometry to construct and understand all the minds of the Universe and the super organisms they order, all the T.œs=¬∆@st of spacetime and its 5 elements, ¬, the negation of information or entropy, ∆§cales, @-minds, Spatial topologies and temporal ages, IS the Universal Grammar of all languages.

The two new fields opened by complex sciences: Understanding the social, scalar nature of species and its time-death cycles. ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $p: lineal limbs/potentials/territoriesO-§ƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages symmetric to those 3 ∆º spatial ‘physiological/topological/social networks’ made of ∆-1 cells/citizens/matter particles,in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only those systems that reproduce its information survive and are still with us.

In the graph, a summary of the scales of ‘stience’, and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations.

Below we have written with simple symbols of entropy life arrows, and iteration ≈≥, the ternary structure of man in space as a system of organs attached to 3 physiological networks – entropic limbs of motion, reproductive body and informative head; and its ages of time in which each of those networks dominate the whole structure between its emergence from the lower scale of cellular existence as a full being to its entropic death back to cellular and molecular states. So yes, indeed the same ‘Ðisomorphic laws’, derived from the cyclical fractal nature of ðimespace organisms allow us to explain the whys of galaxies, humans and social organisms.

Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ traveling through those i±1 scales.

Indeed, the third ‘great discipline’ of sciences, bio-social sciences, Anthropology, Medicine, History and economics can also be explained with those laws:

In the right side we do show also hidden on the artistic images of the super organism of greek, during the 800 years cycle of iron, infantry cultures, the 3 ages of life of the super organism of Greece, whose subconscious collective, art, mimics in its 3 mental ages, parallel to those of an individual, a young, simple dramatic age of kouroi warriors, a classic reproductive balanced age of art and sensorial pleasures, and a 3rd baroque, warped, angst age before the death of Greek civilizations to war, the germs that kill by excess of technological evolution the super organisms of history.

And then when you observe them in the ∆-¡ ‘small scales of time’ you obtain the 5 Actions of existence. And when you see it from the ∆+¡ scale of the world in which the super organism is a mere atom/cell/citizen you observe full time§pace cycles of a micro-being running through its s-paces, enslaving for the larger being.

FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SPACETIME ORGANISMS.

We are now going the full way to the most complex formal views of the pentalogic and non-euclidean structure of the universe. While in previous posts I tried to be empathic to the @-humind simplifying these models trying to upgrade the subconscious collective, as it did not go too far – it seems even the simplest versions of the ¡logic of the Universe in the age of entropic audiovisual minds smokes the brains of our brightest, and my time is running up I am rewriting the blog to its full comprehension of the ¡logic structures of the fractal, paradoxical Universe.

This will therefore be the final version and the level of complexity in which I have worked in a parallel disordered way in all stiences and the systems of expression of reality I will try to pour in the fourth line, time permitted. As it is the way I see the Universe now for three decades and counting.

Text might be confuse as my @mind is in decline and its mirror of the Tao smearing fast.

So I’ll do my best which will not be good enough, but leave a trace in the snow to melt by future AI or huminds and see the clear water of the entangled Universe in perpetual motion and inter-action.

SYMBOLS OF ÐIMOTIONS

Science is the reflection of the species of the Universe by the still linguistic mirrors-images of humanity. It follows that stiences are the upgraded version of those mirror-images which add the understanding of the 5 Ðimotions from multiple points of view on the entangled Universe (Rashomon’s truths); and the more complex temporal pentagonal logic (¬Aristotelian logic) and fractal space (Non-Euclidean mathematics) derived of the more complex understanding of the ultimate elements of all systems, its vital spaces and world cycles of temporary existence.

Thus the formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is non-A and Non-E, hence, the next letter, i. We shall call this upgrading of the humind, i-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, i-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.

The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.

For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:

Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K

A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.

How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.

Let us then now that we have a very basic understanding of the ternary topological elements of a given en space-time plane ($t§ð), and its two ‘perpendicular, past to future, entropic and informative dimensions’ give you a ‘prime’ on that new outlook we insist uses all the data and accurate equations of classic science.

In the graph we can see it in a human being with the ‘symbolic equations of i-logic’:

It is obvious that to express the COMMON laws of all systems according to its relative scales, we need an entire new jargon and a general upgrading of the laws derived of the structure of space and time, which is ginormous, because they come in all systems.

This is the purpose of the non-euclidean, non-aristotleian i-logic geometry in which fractal space and cyclical time is ‘written’ (as I comes after A and E) and the simple new symbols of a I-logic and its ‘fractal generator’, that is the set of I-logic equations that define the behavior of all systems of the Universe according to the laws of its 5 Dimotions of time-space, which are the same when we ‘are void of details’; and self-center our perspective in a given point of view or T.œ.

Let us then run in its simplest mode the Fractal Generator. And define it for all…. T.œs

 >: ƒuture informative implosion <: past expansive dissolution; ≤≈≥: present iteration <<: entropic death. §,$,∑e,S,∫: 5 Space dimensions. ð,t,∏¡,∂,T: 5 Time motions

actions: a-cceleration; e-ntropic, energy feeding; informative gauging; o-ffspring reproduction; social evolution into u-niversals:                               ∑∏ (iu):$p≥exi≥ðƒ<<$p

A Fractal Generator is a feed-back equation, which in simple terms explains the minimal elements needed to ‘generate’ by iteration, a complex mathematical system. A living fractal is the same concept, only that the ‘5 elements of the generator’ are its dimotions of time-space.

It follows that from this more general fractal generator, all time-space beings, composed of those 5 dimotions, can be generated. 

The purpose of this paragraph is to describe the ‘ternary fractal generator of space-time superorganisms’ with the jargon of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean ‘I-logic geometry‘, the upgraded formalism of logic and mathematics needed to describe a ‘vital, fractal Universe’.

We concluded that to fully understand reality we must upgrade and reorder our view of simultaneous space, which is ternary in its adjacent topologies that form simultaneous superorganisms, and sequential time, which is cyclical, and broken in infinite time clocks.

To that aim we found a 5th Dimension of scalar space-time, in which systems remain co-invariant, as they accelerate its time clocks, when they become smaller: $p x ðƒ = K. This is the mathematical (Klein) definition of a dimension of space-time that allows to travel through it as we slow down and grow in size, through the world cycle of life and death.

We found the reason for that metric in the internal co-ordination of the parts of a larger system, which slow down its external, measurable synchronous clock as a whole. So larger wholes have more internal structure that diminish its speed as a whole.

So the simplest Generator equation of reality would be the 5D metric equation in its spatial ‘still image’: $p x ðƒ = K.

We can then write it through the constant increase of information of system with the symbols of > involution of information and < expansion of lineal spacetime and dissolution of information, as a series of actions that ad on to a worldcycle:

$p >  e x i > ðƒ << $p, whereas $p means a relative lineal past of maximal extension in Space and minimal information, energy x information, the balanced classic age of reproduction, ðƒ, the third future age of increasing information, which in the moment of entropic death, <<, implies a massive erasing of information and growth of entropy, and dissolution of the structures of the system.

Finally we can add to this  simplest expression of the generator, its ternary symmetries in ‘scales’ of size (¡±1), as we are born in an ∆-1 seminal scale, emerge in our ∆o individual scale where we interact with an ∆+1 social world, to dive back in the moment of death to the ∆-1 plane.

And we can also extend the  ∑e x ∏ i, present, intermediate state of maximal balance, in the emergent ∆ø scale, with the 3 topologies of space (|xO≈Ø) that defines the 3 adjacent topological parts of all organisms, |-moving limbs/potentials O-informative particle/heads.

So we obtain a quite descriptive generator equation of all T.œs in time, space and scale, through its worldcycle between seminal birth and entropic death, without the need for the more formal Ðisomorphisms of timespace:

Γst: ¡-1(generation):∫T¡-1(birth)>¡œ:|-$t(youth)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(maturity)>O-§ð(old age)<<¡-1:∂S (death)

Fractal Generator of all Time§paces as a sequential world cycle..

Γst: ¡-1(seed):∫T¡-1(fetus)>¡œ:|-$t(limbs/potential)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(bodywave)>O-§ð(particle-head)<<¡-1:∂S (corpse)

Fractal Generator of Time§paces as a simultaneous, spatial superorganism.

Γst: ∫T¡-1(social evolution)>¡œ:|-$t(locomotion)>Ø-∑e≈∏I(reproduction)>O-§ð(perception)<<¡-1:∂S (entropy)

Fractal Generator of Time§paces as 5 vital actions and sensations.

As the reader can see the same symbols of non-Æ represent in fact spatial, temporal and space-time actions and mental sensations, showing the fundamental ternary similar nature of all realities.

The reader then should assess the interest of learning the simple symbols of ¬Æ to be able to write ‘general laws’ that apply to all relative ∆±¡ planes of reality

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 10.12.09

In the graph a summary of the fundamental elements of the Universe of fractal space-time cycles. On the left the 3 elements that structure the Universe, its cyclical Tƒ forms (membranes and points of view), which enclosed a body-limb system of vital space that moves and reproduces the system. Below the scales of the 5th dimension, in which we always will find those 2 elements.

The Isomorphic method is the detailed, orderly analysis of those elements and properties common to all beings that ‘exist’. Its full account for each species encompasses all the information needed about any ‘existential world cycle of any super organism or one of its fractal parts.

The Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=female, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.

The graph defines the scales of  ‘∆-sciences’ and its space-time species, where ‘i’  (old graphs)  or ‘∆’ is the symbol for the ‘space-time planes’ of scientific existence, from: ∆=1 forces, through ∆=2 atoms and ∆=3 molecules, ∆=4: matter states, ∆=5: geological structures (physical scales) to ∆=4 cells, ∆=5 organisms, ∆=6 social planets, and then again, ∆=7 stars, ∆=8 galaxies and ∆=9 universes. In modern texts we use a self-centred ± cardinal with man as the ∆o scale. So the larger scales are, ∆+1: History, ∆+2: Gaia and the solar system, ∆+3 Galaxy, and ∆-1: cell, ∆-2, molecule and ∆-3: atom, to show the similar structure between those 2 limits of human perception (s ∆-3: Atom ≈ ∆+3 galaxy).

How many of those stientific scales do exist? The answer is 9, after which marvellously the systems of atoms and galaxies become so similar that once we reduce their different speed of time clocks and sizes in space with 5D metric: Spe x Tƒi= ∆k, we shall find indeed that galaxies and atoms are self-similar and so the Universe of scales might be infinite.

In any case from atoms to galaxies the ‘experimental method’ finds enough information to make a proper description of them. Beyond and below those regions uncertainty is so huge that only the ego-trips of humanity dares to utter ‘experimental dogmas’ of truth, such as the big-bang above and string theory below. So those are the stiences we shall deal with from atoms to galaxies and consider the scales beyond the ∆±4 world of particles inside the atomic nuclei and galaxies beyond the horizon of cosmic perception, completely unknown, beyond the metaphysical argument of a infinite Universe of self-repetitive scales…

In each scale of existence the fifth dimension receives in a different language a different name by each Tiƒ, singularity-mind or referential point, speaking in a different language-mapping mirror of the game of existence. So  some names humans know to explain existence in the fifth dimension are the life-death cycle and its ages (time perspective), eusocial love and its parables (organic, spatial perspective), the concept of God, as mind of all scales, Tao or Brama in eastern tradition. The hyperbolic and riemannian geometries between them, the scalar relativity formalisms; and so on. What then should be the proper definition? Several according to the multiple º∆±st views of reality.

From the pov of the mind, ∆º the best word is a ‘lanwave‘, a wave of beings directed by an informative language-network, which the Tiƒ element provides.

From the pov of the ∆±i scales, the best word is ‘social love’, the arrow of future that by sharing energy and information creates superorganisms.

From the pov of topological space-time, the best word to define it is ‘network‘, the gathering of points into social topologies, with forms and symmetric functions.

And from the perspective of the wholeness, the word ‘Absolute relativity‘, which explained the homology of the laws of all scales, none of which is preferential.

In the absolute relativity of an infinite scale of spaces, which repeat themselves from atoms to galaxies, without any reason not to be infinite, in its variations, we find also by reduction of ∆±i to ∆±1, ∞ superorganic structures, ab. Œ.

And so the supœrganism is the best choice for a meaningful understanding of the structures of social planes e find every where,, which in the next graphs are summarised from physical and biosociological sciences:

In the graph, the Universe has infinite time clocks, that code its information in the frequency and speed of its time cycles. Those time clocks change as we change scales of the fifth dimension, from vortices of ‘future time’, attractive paths designed by charges and masses, and so change the quanta of space, from planckton to cells and citizens, and the networks of entropy, energy and information, but the structure remains in space – an ∆º±1 supœrganism (œ) and time, an ∑worldcycle, sum of all steps of present e x  i momenta of the system. So we conclude that the purpose of the Universe is to create supœrganisms, tracing wordcycles of exi=st¡ence; where the balance of space and time, entropy and information ensures the being’s immortality in its ‘age of reproduction and iteration of its forms’, and each space-time plane, i=n, is described by a ‘stience’.

Overview: the structure of all scientific scales and species, its 9+2 dimensional isomorphisms.

General Systems sciences and its formalism describes all systems of the Universe. As such is a philosophy of science that encompasses all other sciences, both in its formal and empirical descriptions.

And so it has 3 fundamental branches; those concerned with ∆, S and T laws, which we have described in 3 x3+• formal sets of laws that define:

– The S=10¹º ‘scales’ of size of the Universe.

-The ∆-planes of Space-time, dimensional existence, which requires the evolution of non-Euclidean Geometry to describe properly all those planes of vital ‘spaces’. Thus i-logic mathematics deals with the topology of the Universe, and its points-particles. It departs from the evolved 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean Geometry.

– And the formalism of the 3 dimensions of ‘time’, which requires a non-Aristotelian logic. Thus since the universe is non-a in its logic and non-e in its geometry, we do go the next letter, which appropriately is the i (:

And then there are 2 empirical sciences, dedicated as simplex 4d sciences do to study, the 3 ‘0±1 planes of organization.

The ∆o±1 planes around man, studied by the so-called Life=biological systems

The ∆o±>2 planes both above and below, which are the astrophysical sciences, which study Physical=material systems.

And Social sciences, which in fact are a branch of biology,  both in its economic ecosystem description of organic machines and its study of Human Social Systems.

Thus ∆ST also is the foundation of formal new sciences that introduce the new logic of 3 time dimensions, the new topologies of fractal, vital space and the new organic analysis of its planes and scales, and then fit data and give new solutions within the enlarged formalism of mathematic and logic.

Those 3 formal sub disciplines are the scaffolding of all realities.

Since the formalism of those 3 ‘type of structures’, is Causal Logic (time formalism), Topology (Spatial Formalism) and Organicism (hierarchical, isomorphic planes and social scales).

Now since we deal both with a logic and mathematical formalism and a philosophy of science, on the ‘General perspective’ and an astounding array of specific data of each science framed with the scales and isomorphisms of the Universe, there are in that sense 3 main formal approaches to the discipline,; and 9 main ‘scalar sciences’.

They are studied in the down sentence, and should translate time permitted, or through the work of future practitioners the entire ‘encyclopedic’ knowledge achieved by mankind in a somehow disordered manner, both in science and philosophy, with human senses (art forms) and mechanisms (modern science) in logic language and metaphoric ones (religions, fictions, myths)

Thus the main epistemological advance of ∆ST, is the use of the same dimensional spatial, temporal and ∆ST scalar laws to describe all systems as all of them are ∆ST ‘organic systems’ that follow the 3 type of laws.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.07.08 In the graph a mapping of the fundamental ‘enlarged’ key laws of General Systems Sciences that all systems of the Universe follow. Classic science consider some of them in a disconnected way for certain species, we shall apply them to all species, which follow those ‘isomorphic laws’ derived from the existence of 3 common ∆ST elements in all beings. For a full understanding of the previous graph, please read the article on the 10 main isomorphisms of all the species of the Universe; its mathematical non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, its world cycle or ‘life-death ages’ and its  bidimensional topologies and 3 organic parts, which makes up a super organism.

The universe and all its fractal parts is a game of creation and destruction of ternary symmetries of space, defined by its 3 canonical topologies, the fastest geometry of planar/lineal limbs/fields of growing past, entropy≈energy, hyperbolic waves-bodies that reproduce the present system and relative future arrows of information, stored in spherical heads/particles, the topology that stores more information in lesser space. It is a topology however made of points that become fractal networks, and so each topological form is a cellular form made of smaller points, which grow in size as we come closer to them uncovering a new scale of the 5th dimension, in which each top becomes again a fractal superorganism.

It is thus a very simple structure, but the devil is in the details, and so to fully grasp how ∆st symmetric ternary beings reconstructed simultaneously in space as a ternary organism, which goes through 3 ages of life as an evolution of those topologies, and displays its actions across 3 relative ∆±1 scales of cellular/atomic, thermodynamic/organic, ecosystemic/gravitational forces, we need to create a more detailed formalism of reality.

This we achieve widening the analysis of those 3×3 structures (ternary topologies of space, ternary ages in time ternary social scales in which the being exists), into 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic sets of laws’, where the o-point or point that integrates the different parts, scales and time cycles of the being, into a ‘whole’ single entity, or ‘mind’, is the most important element.

All is indeed better explained when we have the ‘original truth’ as a reference to evaluate ‘partial versions of it’.

The basic tenants of GST.œ

We are going to explain the whole world here with only those 3 time motions, its spatial symmetries and ternary co-existent planes of the 5th dimension that creates a super organism (ab.œ) seen from a large scale as  a fractal point-particle, which in detail is a knot of cycles caused by those three arrows cycles of timespace and its ‘entropic/digestive; energetic/reprodutive and informative/perceptive’ networks, of which we are all made.

As we are all supœrganisms, whic lives a worldcycle, made of actions of absorption and emission of the 3 time arrows; as being stop and perceive, go≈move and spend energy to arrive to new fields where absorb information and motion.

Beings thus follow patterns which are beats of information and motion, actions of perceiving and feeding, either perceived as a ‘dynamic flows of time cycles’ , or as  a series of ‘still photographs of static space’, (as the duality of a movie, made of stills. We exist as a series of small derivatives, that measure and put together all those time cycles into simultaneous ‘slices’ of space’:

  • ∂t=S; which added together, K(v) x ∂t=S  creates the steady speed of time motions we see around us, v=S/∂t.

This is what we are, a sum of multiple time cycles, knotted into simultaneous synchronous flows of time, seen by the static mind that perceives them, as a series of still pictures of space that put together the fractal puzzle of the world.

And so with this duality of 3 time motions and its corresponding 3 spatial forms, we shall resolve, logically and mathematically, all the questions unresolved in science due to this huge simplification of cyclical times, the ultimate ‘formal motion’ of the Universe.

Since as it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main parameters of truth of science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.

 

LAWS &  SYMMETRIES ACROSS SCALES OF THE PANTHEIST, PERCEPTIVE UNIVERSE

screen-shot-2017-01-14-at-06-46-23

In the graph, consider the well known case of homology and analogy in evolution. The bat and the bird are said not to be related genetically and their wings evolved in anagogic, parallel. Fact is in ST-beings and STiences all BEINGS share their topologic properties because they are made of spatial entropy, and the line (and plane) are the fastest/shortest distances in Euclidean light space-time. And their organic properties derived of the ∆-5th dimension are also homologic. So as we go a bit further back in time than evolution, we find that indeed the plane, the man, the bird and the bat have all the best topological form in its extremities for motion, (lineal, planar) because they all are made of ‘vital space’. This is the principle behind the homologic≈isomorphic method (equal form).

So how we classify all the isomorphic laws ST-beings follow? The simplest way is by dividing those laws through its origin, either in space symmetries, time ages, ∆-organic scales or mind-languages and its ternary Universal grammar, resumed in the language of all languages (the Generator). We do so in the second line, in which we study:

The 0 and 1 isomorphism, the mind and its languages, resumed in the language of languages, the formalism of GST and its Fractal Generator of Space-time (the equation that resumes the logic of all space-time events and scales of the Universe).

Then we study the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time, and its space-time ‘present body-wave, energy’ combinations.

We do so in a synthetic, integral manner first, in the second and third isomorphisms; and then in an analytic, derivative form, as we consider those time-ages and world cycles of super organisms, the sum of a series of space-time actions of exchange of energy and information between the inner being and its outer world, which put together in cyclical, discontinuous events create the world cycle of all Universal systems: they are the 4th, 5th and 6th and 7th isomorphisms where we describe beings as ‘knots of space/time actions’ ruled by a series of vital constants, which are mostly ‘ratios’ between space, time and scalar quantitative parameters, and so we find in them, the connection, with the quantitative methods of the mathematical-only method of present reductionist science. 

Which lead us to differentiate in the 8th isomorphism the allowed species of each plane of existence, once the thoughts of God are literally explain in the 0-1 isomorphism in the most general way, then in a symmetric manner in the 2nd and 3rd isomorphisms (duality and trinity), to expand them further in the 4th, 5th and 6th isomorphisms (around the ±4 planes systems exchange energy and information with through the 5th actions and the 6 main vital constant ratios of each being, and its 7 different motions=changes=time cycles)…

Finally once we study how dual and ternary symmetries (2³=8), create the Universe within the limits of its minimalist elements, as we are all made of ‘temporal entropy’, we can see how beings evolve socially through networks into superorganisms, along the decametric, logarithmic scales of creation that first develop ‘genetic societies’ (based in time relations), then spatial ones (based in geographical extensions) and finally space-time ones (based in organic networks) to form an ∆+1 10ˆ10 §upœrganism), which gives birth to a new ∆≈Ξ-plane of existence (∆ being the dynamic symbol, Ξ the static organic ternary one).

So we complete the full description of how ∆ûst (ab. dust of space-time) becomes a super organism through a world cycle of existence, emerging into a whole, ∆, from an initial ∆-1 seed of information, till it returns to the ∆-1 scale.

So we will have developed the verbal conceptual knowledge of the first line in a more formal, scientific manner, using the expanded isomorphic method, which we will be able to apply then in the 3rd line for each species and being – time permitted, and if not, as Descartes put it when he found 400 years ago the previous huge ‘advance of the scientific method’ since Aristotle, with analytic geometry: we shall stop here our analytic geometry to leave something to do  to future researchers, which will expand these notions (quoting from memory).

Now, for those who find strange the symmetry between numbers and properties, Ok, the 6th and 7th isomorphism (vital constants of each being and cyclical motions) can be argued to have more or less fundamental elements.

So I have selected the most important constants and cycles to fit this classification, doubting often between describing 6 or 7 constants or cycles (hence both versions might be found in different sections of the web). Yet as it stands, they are fairly covered; since numbers do have indeed a certain ‘numerology’ hidden on the symmetries of species.

Indeed when cheng-tzu said from one, the line comes 2, the information of bidimensional cycles or broken lines which combine to reproduce 3 and then ∞ beings, is expressing something mathematicians wonder around since the Chinese and Fermat first introduced as mathematical concepts – the laws of numbers).

But this is a theme of the section on maths, which will be the last to be covered (: PRECISELY because nobody will take seriously this work till I show you every main law of mathematics to be related to GST, ∆•ST laws 🙂 So nobody will bother me, till the believer and pedantic scholar thinks I am talking his language of God, well-enough to deserve respect.

Now, how we do ‘detailed’ studies of this motions of existence, which develop a program of actions in space-time, which creates a finite super organism with a finite duration? In the first line we have done it in a loose way, as we study the meaning of those concepts and give a general view of the algorithm of creation of the Universe. In the second line, introduced by this post, we shall do it in greater detail by analysing those super organisms of ∆•st of space-time and its world cycles, part by part, considering how the ∆, S, T and •mind-point structure the growth and dissolution of dust of space-time into a superoganism of island universe back and forth, through those world cycles. So we can better distinguish between the main sets of organic laws that guide those motions through scales, topologies and ages of space-time.

The scales of energy and information, in decametric, or dual scales.

Wholes have the capacity to kill smaller wholes, but at certain degree of smallness the whole becomes in fact a potential prey. Parts, bacteria that kill wholes, thus can also disaggregate wholes. The predator prey relationship is thus ore complex than it appears. But in any case ever herd ∑Ei, regardless of its inner ∏Tƒ form is perceived as energy for a higher whole, ∏∆+1, which will try to explode the ∑ herds and feed on I∆-1 forms, laving behind the ∑ head.

He state in which one finds at each moment of the existential game, prey in a herd, knot of higher thought reproducer, creator, all those functions as complex as we might feel them are finally mere åctions of the equation of existence, and that sets the existential algebra as the mathematics of the function of existence.

Which itself is the generator equation of complementary systems of energy and information eh fundamental particle of reality made of an Se x Tƒ sections body-head, particle-fields that preys in a herds of micropoints ∑Sp∆-1 and so we establish a hierarchical class structure of future, present and past also as the future takes advantage of the present and the past is the neuronal caste of information while the present is the middle class which busy busy reproduces and produces the entropy of ∑Sp∆-1.

This is the key to understand in terms of social classes past, the lower caste, present the reproducer, repeater caste and future the informative caste. For example in human scales, male which are mind dominant, with lineal bodies and woman which are productive body dominant, with an energy head, you can establish future, upper caste of males a reproductive caste of women, and then the ∑ of ∆-1 natural animals seen as a lower caster of information and hence treated as pure energy by the human ‘family’ complementary couple, man-woman.

The expression in which the simultaneous equation of past=energy, present=reproduction future=Information manifests itself. Are multiple.

Energy (past, ecosystem) > Present (reproductive body) >Future, (Informative mind)…

It is the simplest and most common point of view, a fractal future zero point of maximal information guides a middle class of reproductive capacities, and higher matter brains, that keep the join relationship between energy and information alive: Sp X Tƒ =K, S=T+K, K, Sp, Tƒ.

The sub-disciplines of ∆ST

In the graph, a glimpse to the 3 type of dimensions of scalar space-time, the 9 scales in which beings interact, its 3 topological organs or ‘fractal dimensions of space’ and its 3 ages of its world cycle, analyzed with existential algebra (the equations below), in this case for the human ‘variety’.

Ultimately the formalism of ∆-scalar spaces-times and its philosophy General Systems Sciences, are dimensional theories.

Still we can distinguish a sub-discipline of Dimensional Theory proper which describes the 15:3s+3t+9st Dimensions of all systems.

Because ‘Se, Space dimensions’, Sl, Sh, Sw (fractal length-lineal motion, height-cyclical motion and width-wave motion), Time Dimensions (Tp<e, Tr=a, Tf>o, past-young entropy, present-repetitive adult action, and future old form), and ∆-scalar dimension of size and different speed of time, ruled by the metric ∆=Sp x Tƒ are of different quality, they give birth to different sub disciplines.

So we have 3 specific disciplines, which study in great detail those dimensions grouped into its 3 different types, both as generic types and as ‘isomorphisms’ of topological forms, time ages and scalar organization, common to all beings of the Universe:

Spatial Dimensions, studied by ∆-topology – the mind’s language that in a synoptic way expresses the 3 bidimensional varieties of space.

Existential Algebra, which studies the 3 causal time-ages.

Theory of Organisms, which divides in 2 fundamental sub-disciplines, a larger view, which studies the ∆-scalar dimensions, and its laws; that is the 9 0±4 scales in which the being interacts and a shorter time-span, space-size view, which study the social S10 scales of evolution needed to ‘transcend’ between ∆-planes.

Absolute relativity.

The fundamental law of the ‘metric of ∆-planes’ is the law of absolute relativity:

‘0±4=Se x Tƒ: the product of the spatial energy and temporal information, or ‘existential force’ of any system of the Universe is co-invariant, has the same value, thus in ‘subjective’ Tƒ, frequency time, any system of a given family of 0±∆ co-invariant entities in the Universe live the same quantity of existence”

This is the basis of Absolute relativity, the implicit non-anthropomorphic philosophy of science of ∆ST.

It is then obvious that from a philosophical perspective ST is a theory of absolute relativity, as all systems follow the same isomorphisms. Further on the ∆-dimensions of the Universe  – as we prove in the post on the Unification of charges and masses, that determines the isomorphism of atoms and galaxies deduced from that equation, both quantitative and qualitatively  – are infinite in number.

Thus humans merely occupy the ‘central ∆-position’ of the scales we know. And this explains also the similarity of the smaller and larger one, and the lack of perception of both (quantum uncertainty and cosmic dark matter and energy).

So we get much more information on the scales of organisms, life and societies, NOT because they are more complex but because we perceive it all. If we were able to see the entire galaxy 96% hidden energy and dark matter, it would resemble a cell. And since an atom and a galaxy are self-similar the most obvious hypothesis is that all scales are organic, all have complex forms.

So for the 3³ ∆-dimensions known to man, we shall form groups of 3 that form the 3 fundament systems:

  • the ‘∆-1 force, ∆-atom, ∆+1 molecules
  • the ∆-1 cell, individual, ∆+1 society,
  • And the ∆-1 star, ∆-galaxy and ∆+1 Universe. And as it happens, we can model a galaxy as an atom, whereas the stars are the electronic nebulae, the black holes the protons, and so the Universe we see must be the commonest group of atoms we perceive (99% of the atoms of the cosmos): a cloud of hydrogen.

Indeed, Einstein-Walker model already modeled galaxies as hydrogen atoms to get his relativity equations. The metric of ∆-scales show protons to have the radius of black holes and electronic nebulae the quantum wave equation of galaxies. 

Further on, when we consider the entire human scale, we find that we use as ‘energy’ ∆-2 molecules, breath ∆-3 oxygen and perceive ∆-4 light pixels, and further above us, we receive our ‘sun-energy’ from ∆+2 solar systems…

While the galaxy is responsible of the existence of the sun and its gravitational, black hole waves might even be cause of the 11 year cycles of sun spots, with the same periodicity, which themselves influence the cycles of weather of the planet, which determine the cycles of history in great measure.

So to fully grasp the interrelationships of mankind at all levels the full model must account for all the ∆-scales mankind perceives, the 3³ scales.

The isomorphisms of all scales.

Those laws are the main 9 isomorphisms of the Universe:

 

GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY (GST) THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE AND ITS SPACE-TIME GENERATOR: ΓST 

There are many possible jargons to explain the paramount consequence of the organic structure of the Universe made of equal system of space-time. The simplest one is the concept of isomorphism (biology) or invariance (physics), which defines departing from substance

General Systems is a theory of absolute relativity. Its aim is to describe all the isomorphisms, invariances and conservation laws of the Universe – 3 concepts which mean the same: an immortal reality that keeps reproducing self similar forms in space traced by self similar events/cycles in time, whose repetition leave a pattern of frequencies that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe.

To that aim it departs from a simple Concept: the properties of reality derive from its ultimate substance cyclical space an fractal time.

Those 2 substances, combine into present energetic space-time beings, and so we can write for all beings; a ‘generator equation’ of the three arrows/substances of space-time of which the being is made and then obtain from them the laws, ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘invariances’ that are common to all systems of reality.

In fact all systems of reality can be described as ‘fractal supœrganisms’ made of ‘lineal limbs/fields/moving platforms of spatial entropy’ and ‘cyclical particles/heads/chips’, which store clocks of temporal nformation, joined by an intermediate, hyperbolic space-time body-wave, extending at least in 3 relative ‘scales of size and time speed’ (ab.∆±1). So we can write a synoptic equations or ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, which we study in depth in this post:

Œ ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe < ∆: ØS≈T > ∆+1: Tiƒo

Whereas Œ is any super organism of space-time extending those three scales, the atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and gravitational/social scales, composed of limbs/fields of spatial entropy (|-spe), which extract motion from lower scales or territories (∆-1), feeding a balanced body-wave, Ø-St, guide by a singularity or mind made of clocks of temporal information, Tiƒo (head-particle), which observes and disguise the system through its upper scale, ∆+1 or relative world:

All what we see are super organisms created by the actions of a singularity that synchronise the parts of the being through three networks of entropic, feeding, reproductive and informative, perceptive form; creating ‘still pictures’ of present-spacetime – those super organisms, which a mind sees as a whole, freezing longer flows of in/form/ation, forms-in-action that leave a memorial trace perceived as a separate being, as they perform cyclical events from past to future.

And so we must distinguish the processes that allow the existence of a series of still sheets of present space – the construction of simultaneous networks; which become dynamic invariances of entropic, energetic, informative systems and its ternary scales; from those processes of evolution and reproduction in time which allow the existence of repetitive forms and systems that reproduce once and again, giving birth to the invariances of in/form/ation, frequencies.

Relativity showed all systems are invariant to motions in space.  But physical invariance to motion, ultimately a form of reproduction of the information of a system over a lower scale of space, derived of the isotropy of that lower space, which the being transits with the same ‘wavelength’, is only one of the many invariances=isomorphisms of the Universe.

When we widen the concept of invariance to ‘self-similarity’ and ‘isomorphism’ – a more general term – the species of the Universe show to be self-similar and invariant to the ultimate properties of scalar, cyclical space-time and its three arrows:

So there are invariances=self-similarities of entropic motion and invariances of energy an invariances of processes of information and topological self-similarities in the organs and geometries that carry the three arrows of time of all the beings of the Universe:

– Invariant to changes of ‘in/form/ation’ (topological invariance), shown in the existence of only 3 topologies in a 4-dimensional Universe, which correspond to the 3 formal functions of all systems, the energetic membrane or sphere, the toroid body that exchanges energy and information with the hyperbolic, informative, central zero point of the system.

–  Invariance of scale which define a 5th, fractal, scalar dimension made of growing scales of size and self-organization that evolve reality from the smallest particles into the complex organisms and galaxies of the upper scales.

– And invariance of time frequencies, which determine the causality laws of the Universe and life-death cycles of all systems of the Universe, among them the invariance of 3 time ages of life and the parallel 3 states of matter in physical systems.

And derived from the invariance of those essential parameters of reality, scale motion,  form, its energetic combinations:

– Invariance of the 4 actions that combine energy (e) and in/form/ation (i): energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both (exi) and social evolution, of parts into wholes:

Formalism of absolute relativity.

Classic Topology, Fractal, non-Euclidean Geometries, and ternary logic, further evolved by this author (definition of the first four non-Euclidean postulates and the paradoxical ternary logic of all systems that exchange form and motion between its Spe<ST>Tiƒ poles) become the formal tools to study those invariances represented by the feed-back, fractal generator equation.

As we get into further detail an choose instead of the physical term, ‘invariance’, the biological one ‘isomorphism’, we shall consider 10 basic invariances-isomorphisms of the Universe derived of the constitutive substance of all systems, ∆±1 scales, entropic space (Spe), energy (Exi) and information (Ixe), and cyclical time forms (ƒ), which is the ‘substance’ origin of its combined actions (a,e,i,o,u), an its worldcycles cyclical time frequency; all of which studied in this third line in great detail can be formally treated as partial equations of the generator, Γst.

The fractal generator represents thus many things:

In full form, the principle of conservation of energy and information: S<st>T; and the complementary structure of all systems made of energy fields/bodies and informative heads/particles.

In partial ‘derivative equations’ , the actions all systems enact to improve their chances of survival by maximizing their invariances.

In time as a dynamic ωorldcycle with three stationary points become the topological formal ages and allowed states of all biological and physical systems: Max. E (sphere, energetic youth, gas); Max. ExI -> E=I, (toroid, reproductive age, liquid) and Max. I (zero point, 3rd informative age, solid).

In partial analysis of each of its three parts, mind, body wave and fields limbs, the key to understand the three fundamental ‘sensations’ of reality, perception, reproduction an motion.

An so on, and so on.

Since all stable systems are a combination of the 3 topologies that maximize the fractal generator and all existences a motion in time through its 3 stationary points=ages, the generator is also an ideal formal level of reality; while all failed mutations and unstable particles are incomplete sets or ‘vibrational modes’ created around the ideal ‘generator’ of each species, which did not obey its rules of topological form, balance between parts and failed to ‘exi=st’, performing efficiently its world cycle of life, reproduction an death.

Reason why I call the Fractal Generator, the Equation of Exi=stence – an algorithm, constantly run by the Universe that generates all its living and non-living systems in space and its ages/states of time and matter.

VI.  Disomorphic method

A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

Now, we shall start this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of such an organic philosophy of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a ωorldcycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centered point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension.

 On the other hand, the cyclical nature of time, will establish the reason why space-time events and forms repeat in the universe, justifying epistemologically in sounder grounds the fundamental two elements of science – predictability of future events, based in its occurrence in past times, and logic coherence, or causality beween past and future events.  Yet causality in a 5Dimensional Universe is more complex than in classic science, as time is cyclical, meaning that from past to future, we observe an arrow of information, which then returns from future to past, as an arrow of entropy completing a causal worldcycle.

Finally it is of great importance the duality between still form (mind view) and motion, both to understand the relationship between space and energy and time and information. And to understand the whys of the Principle of relativity.

The need for a forest view.

The extreme quantity of details obtained through the mechanic method (observing reality with digital machines of higher sensorial power than human spatial eyes but not of a higher logic that temporal words) has made scientists to deny the true reason science started as synonymous of synoptic knowledge with the Greeks – to understand its ultimate principles and why it is all so simple and repetitive in its cyclical patterns, why there are laws of science (precisely out of the cyclical nature of time that repeats causes and events), where those laws come from (of the Isomorphic properties of its time cycles, spatial topologies and fractal scales: ∆§t->isomorphic laws of science)… This now forgotten maximal goal of knowledge, shun off by specialists which have ‘advanced’ so much in the details, is precisely what we regain in this blog: the ultimate meanings.

I am in that sense fully aware that rational thought has moved from an earlier Greek age of little detail by lack of mechanisms of perception of scalar space (telescopes, microscopes) and cyclical time (mechanical clocks), which however could find ‘formally’, focused in ‘languages’ and its syntactic mirrors of reality many fundamental laws of the Universe, with astounding intuitions about the essence of reality… into the present age of an astounding mechanical capacity to observe in space and measure in time, the forms and frequencies of systems and events… which however is clearly lagging in the understanding of the linguistic mirrors we put on reality and ultimately express the rational capacity of man to ‘know’.

Science in that sense means to ‘know’, and knowledge is ultimately linguistic knowledge. So today we suffer the opposite sickness to that of the greeks: we have still formal languages stuck in the Greek age of Euclidean geometry (as we have only corrected the fifth postulate of geometry, foundation of mathematics) and Aristotelian logic (with a single time arrow), which are simplified mirrors of the scalar spatial and cyclical temporal nature of the Universe, and so we try to fit an astounding amount of detailed, complex observations, into the simplex ‘formal box’ and the result is a confusing modelling, and most often a mere ‘account of data’, observations, pictures and measures without models at all.

And of course, as humans are huge egos, and they never recognise their incompetence, we can observe, specially among physicist, an ‘attitude’ of disdain towards the philosopher of science, reflected in the dictum of Feynman, which shuns off philosophy of science, since the why is the only thing a ‘lesser mind’ never asks.

Scientists in the time i used to attend congresses had in that sense mostly the attitude of the fable of Esopus and the fox who despised the vine it could not reach. They simply don’t care mostly for the final element of the scientific method, which must A) first gather experimental data, then B) find regular cycles and the repetition of cyclical events, to obtain finally C) rational models of synthetic reality to forecast future repetitive events.

Instead many scientists today, specially young experimentalists, on the age of ‘visual thought’, think all what there is to science is A) gathering data with sensorial machines B) put then in the language of mathematics with the help of computers to C) make a nice picture/graph of data. And alas! all has been revealed… No need for linguistic, synoptic mental mirrors to ‘intuitively’ feel the whys and causal reasons of that data.

This method focused on computer modelling has in turn created a ‘religion of digital thought’ as the only language of science, shunning off the organic, co-existing properties derived of the fractal structure of Nature’s systems, and of course, the human ego has a priori denied any ‘perceptive’ or ‘living’ properties to anything that is not like us.

So sciences are reaching a simplistic, quasi-religious outlook as today many scientists think though that A suffices and C must not be evolved, but old cranky models which are ‘dogmas’ must always be used. Since this is an easy method, simple, pedestrian, memorial, repetitive, well established.

It is sometimes funny to observe how even experimental facts are denied to force-feed data into old known-known models, without changing paradigm (i.e. observation of non-local faster than light speeds, denied to maintain the 4D model of light space-time, which should only apply within galaxies, in the human perceived scales; observation of social, organic evolution as the best strategy of survival of species, denied to maintain the ‘victorian’ dog-eat-dog vision of evolution of Mr. Darwin and the competition of individuals as the sacred dogma of capitalism, to put to obvious examples).

We shall of course accept the merit of that method, but go further, by upgrading the foundations of maths, to show they reflect also organic properties, when properly understood, and then work NOT on C)silly-nilly powerpoint graphs as ‘the truth’ of scientific modelling, but build sound linguistic template models derived from the ultimate substance of all beings, mathematical space, cyclical time, and organic space-time scales of the fifth dimension, to fit A)data expressed in B)io-logical & topological models based in the organic properties of the 5th dimension  and the symmetries between the three arrows of time and the three equivalent topologies of space.

And then we also make C) ‘digestible’ nice graphs, with some artistic ‘latino’ flavour just for fun 🙂 oh, yes, the model includes also human senses, called now art and literature as if they were void of truth, just because we are not machines, and shun off the pedantry of our experimental scientists and the P.R.ess and industry of big-science with his hyperbolic sense of self-importance, which confuse complicated jargons with truth when the Universe is in fact ‘simple but not malicious’ (Einstein), as ‘simplicity is genius’  (Leonardo).

So another difference of this blog of synthetic philosophy of science and the topic paper of the specialist written with a forbidding jargon, void of meaning but looking very ‘cool’, specially if you don’t understand a word of it, is our effort to return to the ‘meat’ and ‘content’ that matters. i.e. for example in mathematics we return to the real units of space, fractal points, and time, sequential numbers, back to the first principles, shunning off the pedantic, idealist German school (Hilbert’s axiomatic method, Cantor’s set theory), because as Godel and lovachevski’s proved mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences (Heaviside), in as much as it is the best linguistic mirror that extract the common properties of all systems made of fractal points, associated in numbers, which are growing scale of parts that conform the whole new planes of the fifth dimension.

Mathematics are NOT as the astounding arrogance of Hilbert and the German school told us born of the ‘imagination of the mathematician, which shared with God the only language of the Universe’. Once and again we shall see how the ‘ego-paradox’ of the human being cripple into dogma. Languages are kaleidoscopic mirrors, which distort and multiply the images we obtain of the universe; so all languages do have fictions, including mathematics, and we are interested in pruning the trees of inflationary languages to see the simplicity of the forest, because otherwise as Einstein put it, we will ‘know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’, meaning when it is syntactically correct but a fairy tale, with no correspondence with reality. A fact often forgotten by mathematical physicists who think if they can invent an equation the equation is truth per se, and alas! a particle will appear, call it an evaporating black hole, a SUSY fishy particle (: or a parallel Universe 🙂

Finally a word in defence of humanity, which is still the most profound intelligent system of this planet. Most scientists today think the ultimate answers will come from sensorial machines and A.I. just because they calculate faster. But it is the form and the vital experience of our actions and memories, not the speed of a logic system what gives it its intelligence. And so far humans before A.I. robots roam the planet acting and experiencing events are the best brains, with the highest synthetic quality. So do not expect a Unificationtheory of it all (the other name of this site) come from a computer or its human equivalent, a nerd; but from a human polymath with a long experience on the ‘book of life and nature’, from a fleshy brain of a scientist with maximal praxis in all the fields of the human experience ,and minimal mechanical help – there is enough data gathered by other scientists for the synthesis to be made only with ‘thought experiments’ as Mr. Einstein put it. Our interest is in the forest view, the thoughts of God, i-rational mind of the Universe, not its details, others would add in the future.

Since ultimately this blog is only the first unpolished ‘diamond’ of ‘stience’, a seed that humans or those future A.I. machines when conscious will keep evolving and adding to. And so as all first seeds it might look rough, unpolished, with some errors, and lack of details, you are welcome to add, correct and post, even once you have understood the ‘system’, evolve further, as ideally the fourth line was meant to be a collaborative effort of potential disciples of ‘stience’.

We are just doing what scientists are not doing lost in the groundwork of cataloging the trees: upgrade the ‘albatross’ view above the forest – the models according to the facts by evolving the languages and fundamental principles.

This is obvious and sorely needed. Consider for example the absurd concept of lineal time.  The reader should observe that the very concept of science as a model with predictive capacity is based in the fact that events repeat, and so time is cyclical, measure by the frequency of similar events. How then we can still believe in a single lineal arrow of time? This will then be the first concept clarified in the next chapter of this post.

 

CONCLUSION. T.Œ: a theory of everything organic = ∑T.œs.

We just have looked at organisms with an anthropomorphic bias, consider them only models for beings that closely resemble us. But in a larger view all systems of nature resemble super organisms made of smaller organisms, enclosed in larger wholes in a chain of beings that organises reality as a complex fractal super organism, NOT as a simplex machine.

Moreover only a theory that encloses concepts such as organisms and time cycles make sense of reality. As a mechanism as Newton realized, require a God to put it in motion. So Kepler said ‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to admire his clock-work.’

God indeed is the seer of time, said Saint Augustine, if you want to use mystical terms, the program that moves time and make things change. But at least as Aristotle noticed we need to consider time flows have several modes of change – change in spatial motion, or entropic change, change in the information of the being, or biological change, and reflection of changes in a mind mapping, a language whose syntax mirrors that of the Universe of space-time or mental change.

All in all the whole reality will then be able to fit in a relatively simple scheme of organisation across all those scales of space-time that co-exist in the being – in a superorganism of 10 dimensions of space and time of entropy and information.

Yet as entropy and information are two sides of the same coin, S=T, we talk in more detail of 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time. The 3 usual dimensions of past, present and future; and 2 more of each to define, the growth and diminution of size, between scales, whose laws organise the organic outlook of reality as smaller parts become attached to larger networks, that mess together into organic system.

Physicists call its theory of everything T.O.E. but the model for everything is not clear, we shall call the ever alternative view of an organism, which is the only scientific view, as only an organism is self-generating and hence it does not need an external deity to cause it but only the laws of science, a T.œ, theory of Eerything Organic; A theory of fractal 10 Dimensional Organisms, with 5 dimensions of time and 5 of space...

But how reality reproduces? Simple because reality is made of motion-time that becomes in-form-ation, memorial space, by merely moving it reproduces the motion of the form. And because time as in all clocks is cyclical, repetitive, it reproduces form as it moves and ‘closes’ a form, cycle.

The concept behind T.œ is thus rather simple. The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space-time, hence made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

To proper describe the complexity of an organism, we just need 10 dimensions: 3 of time, past, present and future, 3 of space, its 3 bidimensional topologies or 3 standard ‘lineal dimensions, 3 of ‘∆±i-planes (with its decametric §cales of growth) as all beings co-exist in a larger world and are made of smaller parts, and finally the ‘membrain’ (monad or mind), which closes the ‘open ball’ of 9 dimensions, with its sensorial enclosure membrain that lets entropy, energy and information sip into the being, and its linguistic zero-sum singularity that maps the whole and commands its behaviour.

As such all super organisms of space-time follow the same laws, as they are made of the same substances.  And so we start by a dimensional, static analysis of the being and its 10 dimensions, provided by a simple ‘generator equation’ of each ‘T.œ”.

T.œ then becomes the briefest way to explain it all, as a Timespace œrganism, and also as the Theory of Everything organic, such as: T.œ= ∑t.œs. This is then the simplest conceptual definition of reality.

In the first line we shall explain the static and dynamic workings of all T.œs, in the second line, we shall refer each of the four main sub-disciplines of human thought, which analyse differently physical, biological social and mental=linguistic systems, as T.œs, and in the third line more complex, we shall study each of the main scalar T.œs of reality, with a detailed analysis of its 4 components: space topologies, time ages, organic scales and the @membrain; subdivided in 4 x 3 sub-elements, to fully describe them. It is the isomorphic method that applies 4 x 3 sub-elements of reality to the analysis in detail of all ‘stiences’, each study a range of T.œ according to scalar size.

And so such orderly methodology will show you the unity of all what exists.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering them, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs… My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence that this incoming Fall of 2017 I believe will reach enough clarity and density of information to fully change the paradigm of ‘science’ into ‘stience’ (the study of relational space-time beings), if the reader ‘trusts’ such ‘huge’ affirmation and ‘reasons’ enough to enjoy the reading

The dual, complex Universe.

That is indeed the key word of all the models generated by the use of the two arrows of time-space, entropy and information and its ∞ energetic combinations of momentum, which the Universe conserves: an eternal balance. Hence duality of entropy and information and then the trinity of time arrows, as we ad its ‘momentum/energy combinations’. becomes the philosophy of science that expands the limit of reality, beyond the restricted models of earlier science based in entropy and continuity.

Screen Shot 2018-02-10 at 10.39.03 AM

It seems humans manifest lineal destiny through the power of entropic weapons and the machine cannot be denied. The tree of technology must come over the tree of life. The simplex reductionist theory of reality and time as mere locomotions will not let philosophers of science to complete the task of adding a second dimension of form, of in-form-ation to complete a time cycle. Alas, the most censored theory of reality since metal-weapons of entropic power destroyed the fertility goddesses and the concept of cyclical time of the Neolithic, has been an organic philosophy of science. First in China, the Chin emperor which brought weapons and iron coins, conquered all other kingdoms to the toll of 6 million corpses, forbade under death penalty philosophical books of taoism. Then the entire planet waged a war against the dialectic Hegelian, realist understanding of the organisms of history and economics, which tried to create a planet where man and its ethic verbal languages were above go(l)d and the rights of company-mothers of machines and weapons over humanity. Finally, the resurrection of duality and organicism took place with the formalism of the 5th dimension developed by this writer within the milieu of systems sciences as chair of duality.

We are aware humans are like all time§pace organisms a part of an ∞ Universe of ∞ scales of time and ∞ minds of space – each one perceiving and describing reality, anchored in a single plane, language and point of view.

So it seems obvious the upgrading of the mind into a multiple paradoxical point of view, which is what the Universe hosts is difficult maybe impossible. So far in 30 years in and out of the scholar world clearly unsuccessful, in great part also because ‘realpolitiks’ of mechanical power imposed over reason, and ultimately through history the simplex view of ‘warrior metal-power’ and its ‘lineal time’ and ‘manifest destiny’ has won over any attempt to describe the…

The circular, Complex 5Ð method vs . the @ world cycle.

There are a series of ¡logic paradoxical fundamental dualities in reality, which the @ristotelian humind cannot easily understand and so we need really to try by the antiGoebbels’ method (if you repeat a truth many times people might reason it), to make the @-mind capture the circular complex reality of the entangled Universe.

For the @mind all is about playing from its p.o.v. the game of exi:st¡ence maximizing its actions of reproduction, despite the fact that to do so implies to increase its information, reduce its energy, accumulate errors of repetition of cycles of spacetime and finally die… This is the ‘wave-like’ transversal 11 Dimensional structure that we use most to explain reality for the @mind…

But then there is the ‘algebraic’ group-like structure of the 5 elements of reality as ∆±¡ @:ü S≈T, dust of space-time, where each element of reality, ∆§cales that move the mind up and down, master of its inner world, ∆-1, slave of its trajectories in the larger world, ∆+1, ∞º, minds that think to be an infinite universe but are merely a selfish @-point, Space-form and time-motion that fluctuate into each other and become dissymmetric complementary to reproduce… and each of them relate influence and marry with other element to form a whole, which however is ultimately Ðust and dust shall become.

So the five elements of reality, ∆-scale, Space, Time, @ mind and the whole as entropic dust which shall be dissolved are in fact constantly having views of each other merging into sub-entities taken the 5 elements in combinations of 2 subelements, permutations of hierarchical importance when the entity modulates into the different states, as spatial form or still mind, as temporal motion, always transiting between scales with different a(nti)symmetric angles of inter-action.

So while a description of the system with merely 5 elements might seem simpler, in fact in the entangled Universe of infinite modes of communication, the whole description in detail of all the events happening between all those parts is rather long and complex.

The complex view of the fractal generator.

While the intuitive $p  ðƒ, symbolism is of great use for simplified synoptic studies of the general properties of Scalar, fractal, cyclical timespace, for more detailed analysis as those classic science thus, is of more use a rigorous definition of the 5 Demotions with different symbols, related to the multiple operandi that make up reality in its dynamic interactions.

Indeed, the extraordinary beauty of T.œ, a Theory of the Organic Everything is in the still ongoing research by this fractal point-humind of the connections between the general laws of timespace organisms and the enormous details of all sciences, established with different jargons:

To unify all those jargons and extract with I-logic arguments all the equations of all the sciences of reality from the simplest facts developed in our ‘treatise’ on the Universe in a nutshell, without loosing its ‘deep history of timespace dimotions’, is the task of stience, which I have carried alone in and out for decades with marvelous results and ‘insights’ on future developments of all sciences that have been falling into place.

So for me the model IS no doubt of it, the proper philosophy of science of the Universe. For the skeptic reader however it will likely not be, because 1) it is a new jargon and he has his own; so it is not going back to school 2) anthropomorphism denies common vital properties to other species 3) the author lacks authoritas, as all pioneers. 4) we live in a visual, analytic, computer-based ‘mathematical-only’ world and most humans are loosing fast all verbal-logic skills to the point most of them will find these texts ‘nebulous’ because verbal, logic thought is out of his ‘world picture’. Never mind. If hominids don’t get it, robominds will and if none does and we go under, the satisfaction within my mind happened ‘still’.

Let us then consider briefly the symbols for the Generator Equation of t.œs and its 5 Dimensions.

@>∫T: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) < ∑∏> §ð<<S∂ (still mind form or world).

So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:

  1. Ð: Informative particles/heads: §ð
  2.  Ð: limbs/potentials: momentum: st.
  3. Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏.
  4.  Ðimotion: entropy: S∂: ∆+1<<∆-1
  5. Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T: ∆-1>∆o

Where < is a symbol of growth of motion and so < a symbol of the growth of information.

As we are representing here the 5 ðimotions of existence in terms of logic thought and structures, which will be of great usefulness to discuss logic questions of algebra and existential thought, certainly the view of this article will deal in I-logic terms with our new symbology.

So indeed the Universe is a pentagonal kaleidoscopic fractal self-repetitive interactive entangled ilogic existential form of a higher logic than that of man.

We shall latter explain why we chose all those symbols and develop the non-Aristotelian non-Euclidean formalism in logic and mathematics that describe all time-space organisms.

Enough to say at this stage that And we can write with those simple symbols, a series of Fractal generator equations to describe all T.Œs, both in space as super organisms and in time as world cycles of existence. For example, the Fractal Generator of all systems of nature can be written as:

∆-1: ∫T>∆o: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) §ð (particle-heads)<<∆-1: S∂ (death)

The extraordinary simplicity and beauty of the Universe and all its parts made to its image and likeness is the simplicity of it all, and its ‘Disomorphic nature’, that is the fact all systems follow those laws.

And obviously the commonest one is (-; locomotion, for what is worth to truly understand reality.

Given though the astoundingly primitive outlook of physicists’ philosophy of science – all is about entropic whammies, as the ones they do for real on planet earth, just the tip answers all the weird features of their interpretation of space and time (quantum physics and relativity), and what I always found far more enticing – it perfectly fusion the 3 branches of human sciences, physics, biology and sociology, including all the mystical thoughts, all the memetic scales, all the conundrums of evolution nobody makes sense of it today, and as we said all the questions pending in the previous advance of physical space (quantum) and time (relativity) from the constant of c-speed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum potential fields and dualities wave-particle, to black holes, galaxies, meaning of energy, etc.

But and that is why i feel justified to criticize them so heavily, it is my opinion that most errors of physics ultimately steam from their worldly profession as makers of weapons and digital machines.

So HUMAN PHYSICS has not been  A CLEAN SEARCH FOR TRUTH AS PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IS, but the application but ‘automaton’ people of the machines they discovered, first clocks, then telescopes and finally heat machines and weapons, to their worldview. So they reject conceptual verbal understanding as philosophers do, because their machines do not talk. They reject the other two arrows of time used as nebulous concepts of information and energy because they ARE OBSESSED BY ENTROPIC weapons. And they reject all other sciences of life, and information because that is NOT what they study. So again take your choice, are they stupid or eviL=anti-live? Both.

IT IS THEN easy to see this when the science was founded: Galileo was first master of the arsenal of venice, paid 1000 golden ducats to see how fas an entropic cannonball went, so he founded ballistics first. Entropy as the arrow of time was found by another artillery master count reaumur, boring canons and heating them. Nobel was first merchant of death doing dynamite. The industry of accelerators who explored particles was founded to work on nuclear weapons. And our technological civilisation loved all of them. This mixture of arrogance, ignorance, reductionism, digital worship and denial of truths and whys for which they don’t care, as long as their view pumps their ego and makes them high popes of mankind is encoded in a simple sentence of his first master, mr Kepler, when he said after using his clock to reduce time to lineal measures:

‘God is a clocker has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock-work’. They are still thus thinking as Einstein put it that ‘time is what a clock measures’, and as Galileo and Dirac said ‘God speaks only mathematics’. Fuk then life, man and our future as a species, irrelevant to them.

So in this age of ‘FALSE PLACEBO CARING ORWELLIAN NEWSPEAKS’ alt-truth and egotist, childish virtual entitled minds, my ‘belief’ nuclear physicists are minimally humane soon is gone. They had not changed at all their psyche from the cold war people who menaced to blow us all and kept doing it. If anything they have been degraded intellectually and the press had lost his capacity for proper research.

BUT they have become much smarter in their ‘newspeaks of teleological intelligence, backed by our entire civilisation ‘expert’ in hiding all the truths of life and any philosophy that puts man, life, and the organic paradigm above.

And contrary to belief, this process of intellectual degradation caused paradoxically by the evolution of digital computerised machines that are substituting us and ELIMINATING the temporal, verbal, causal, sequential logic of ‘time-thought’, affects also physicists which have been unable to create ANY serious advance on the models of reality we scientists seek in a century…

In the graph as humans evolve digital computers and sensorial machines, they devolve in its verbal, temporal logic languages, having lost first the understanding of the three verbal/temporal past=entropy, present=iterative reproductive energy and future=dimensional form=information, which was crystal clear in the philosophies of the eastern world (yang=entropy x yin-formation= qi energy) and the syntax of verbal thought (3 verbal ‘times’). When the clock came, time became ‘digitalised’ and the ∞ cyclical clocks of the Universe reduced to the mechanical clock.

Physicists then developed weapon-machines and came on top of history and made of entropy and death a dogma of our civilisation. In that sense, they are increasingly enzymen, men enzymes that catalyse the evolution of mechanisms as automaton attachments that gather data with machines, introduce it in digital models and think that IS all what is worth to know about reality. And of course they think nobody else (and now the worshipping sheeple shares that view) is worth to know about the underlying structure of reality.

As Goethe put it ‘people who use telescopes and microscopes to watch nature think they are smarter than all of us, but they are not’. Yet in a technological civilisation, a philosopher of science which truly answers the questions pending at conceptual level in all sciences as I did with my organic, fractal models of reality that put man again as the most perfect organism in the centre of the Universe, had nothing to do. At best, his work will be used to ‘organise’ company-mothers of machines and evolve robots.

BUT THEY HAVE POWER AND THEY IMPOSE TRUTH WITH IT.


So you believe Galileo and Newton, both WORKING for the arsenals of Italy-Venice and England-Royal Navy, designing ‘spy-glasses’ and cannonball calculus took their place in the collective subconscious as the geniuses of it all (and Einstein because of the A-bomb, in any case overrated, as its merits are lesser than those of Leibniz and Darwin, and Descartes on the great principles, the thoughts of God he seeked for and his arrogance and despise of life legendary, as when he said that women only reproduced their belly to his wife and that if ‘his theory was wrong, God would have to correct the universe, as it was so beautiful’ – still a giant compared to modern digital dwarfs of computer and mechanical thought/pictures. )

Thus ultimately our demise as a species by weapons and machines we worship is a cultural process.

Lets us then briefly define them in the sequential order in which a cycle of exist¡ence happens as we perceive i-nformation to move a-ccelerating towards a field of feeding e-nergy, which will be used to reproduce o-rganically an o-ffspring of similar forms and evolve socially to u-nite into a u-niversal whole…

And each of those actions will be related to all others, in the entangled Universe provoking:

The i-logic Rashomon method.

The ¡logic of the 5гisomorphic fractal Universe is kaleidoscopic, pentagonal, which given the fact that each non-E point-monad is merely @ristotelian, with a single A->B logic, it makes rather difficult to explain it. So we shall try, and to that effect we shall use an ¡logic concept, the ‘Rashomon effect’.

What all this means is that the 5 elements of reality, Space, Time, scales, minds and the entropic destruction of them all, ARE NOT isolated elements but all of them are entangled, perceiving each other in kaleidoscopic forms. 

The metric of the 5 Ðimotions of time§paces has properties that are entangled albeit expressed in different manners by the different languages that perceive them. The 5 Dimotions differ topo-logically, as both its geometry in motion (topology in space)  and logic causality in time  is different. For example a Darwinian event implies the cutting through perpendicular geometries tearing the variety of our topological organs, predated; an act of communication requires on the other hand a parallel motion to allow communication at equal distances of the subtle, ∆-3 pixels an ∆º mind uses to that aim.

When we study the actions of survival across scales, their functions and perspective also differs from the sadistic ministrations we make to the oysters we ‘love’ to torture with lemon to the view the oyster terrified will have in its inner point of view of the monster that eats her alive; and finally in the last layer of reality, perception itself of sensations that reinforce the program of actions, it is a different sensation of exhilarating pleasure an entropy action, that the acute pain of informative knowledge of truth, or the pressure-pain associated to the social evolution into choking herds that inflict order upon us.

All those layers of reality are related to the four elements of the being, its space, its time, its scale and its mind, which provide simultaneous, topological; sequential-logic; sensorial, perceptive and organic biological ± prey-predator scalar elements to all functions of existence.

However as we are representing here the 5 ðimotions of existence in terms of logic thought and structures, which will be of great usefulness to discuss logic questions of algebra and existential thought, certainly the view of this article will deal in I-logic terms with our new symbology.

The different expressions of Ðimotions:

e-motions, the final program of perception.

The element which seems more difficult to introduce within the entangled multi-property Universe is under the ego paradox of restricting e-motions to human existence, that final level of sensations, which in the new terminology that tries to show the entangled relationship of all elements are to be called e-motions.

Initially I wanted to use e-moticons for them and generally I would consider it, if they were available for this keyboard. Then we could talk of 5 e-motions, parallel to the 5 Ðimotions, parallel to the 5 logic suits, parallel to the 5 aeiou actions and 5 topological dimensions and 5 time motions and 5 organic functions… of exist¡ence. They are though only available in hotmail. So they would be, as taken from hotmail’s list, providing 2  and explaining them:

😇,  O>:  : for the fifth e-motion of social love. They both have the ˆ, of ascension to the fifth dimension.

😈, |< For the fourth e-motion of entropy. Obviously the exhilaration of entropy, which however destroy us needs a devil e-moticon.

😳,   O-:  For the 1st e-motion of stopping information. Information stops for perception, opens your eyes, it is though not happy, often painful. S

😍, Ø=:  For the 3rd e-motion of reproduction. Love symbols or converging ones >< as those are the I-logic symbols for happy reproduction, dirty kiss included.

,  (-; For the second e-motion of locomotion, the most stupid of all Ðimotions, mechanical and mindless – so the higher function of thought – the eyes, are somehow lost.

It follows for those who don’t have the nice yellow emoticons, we can use the hand ones. I HAVE chosen them using the symbols of I-logic.

So the 3 emotions related to the informative Ðimotions have O-closed informative paths; the more complex one, Ø=: reproduction, uses the topologic symbol  for iterative, hyperbolic body waves that combine both: Ø=| xO, and the = symbol for ‘couples.

The social evolutionary e-motion of love, O>: uses the implosive, tighter evolving symbol, >

While the inverse exhilarating freedom=chaos of entropy, |<: uses the < symbol of explosive big-bangs and the absolute erased lineal open | path.

Finally the two inverse e-motions of painful awareness with open eyes, O-: vs. the blind, locomotion of  straight vision, null thought and lineal patterns, made with a line and a single-eyes, (-; complete the 5 e-motions, which ultimately with its paradoxical ± sides are the ultimate program of existence.

Ðimotions in physics as the 5 states of motion, acceleration, deceleration, stop and go processes.

5 loco-motions. From the lack of it, in the informative stop, to the steady  locomotion, to the decelerating motion of entropic dissolution, to the SHM, back and forth motions of reproductive actions, to the accelerated inwards motions of social evolution into a TIGTHER higher whole.

As all is connected and all is entangled the variations of events and forms born of the 5 elements or rather 3 ±¡ (given the clear oppositions between entropic actions and social evolutionary ones; between locomotions and information; whereas only reproduction in present seems to bring the 5 dimotions together) at a logical level the best way to express reality is through those oppositions:

4 vs. 5: Decelerating Entropic, 4th dimotions vs. Accelerating Social, evolutionary 5th Ðimotions. We can consider such oppositions to be the most extreme of reality hence we use the concept of antisymmetry for them, symbolized by the ‘warrior’ symbol of ♠ for entropy and the ♥ symbol for social evolution.

1 vs. 2: Stop, informative perception vs. Lineal locomotion. We consider such relationships to be alternate as in the processes of stop and go, perception and motion that are common to locomotion when fully understood as a combination of ‘form and motion’ (wave length and frequency). So the level of opposition is not so extreme and it is NOT a single event so often destroying its ‘repetitive nature’, and as such we can consider them disymmetric and use the suit of diamonds♦, to represent it.

3: Reproduction, which includes in its complex form the other 4 Ðimotions. And so we need a combined mixture of all those processes. 

The concepts of entropic deceleration, social acceleration, static position for information, steady motion for locomotion, and its full combination for reproduction would be in physical terms, the most proper way to describe the 5 Ðimotions, as states of motion in themselves.

5 Iterations. As inflationary languages reproduce infinite views of the same Universe, locomotions happen as adjacent reproduction of the being which repeats its in-formation as it moves, reproduction proper implies a motion in the 5th dimension from seed to whole, and entropic reproduction is the mirage of expansion in space of the being which however looses its inner connections till it explodes, and finally social evolution requires first a clone reproduction to form with those equal parts a whole.

5 Entropic extinctions; of the pixels we absorb and ‘stop’ to perceive them as ‘corpses’ of a mapping; of the ‘fuel’ we need to move; of the ¡-2 elements we break down to reproduce our variety of forms, and viceversa, as death is a dual destruction down to scales of the fifth dimension ¡º<<¡-2; while social evolution of the whole destroys the freedom of its parts…

5 Social evolutions. Finally a mapping of information is the social evolution of the pixel stopped in the mind, a locomotion is a series of adjacent reproductive memorial tails of the being fading fast away in lineal fashion, a reproduction requires a palingenetic clone evolution of parts into wholes back and forth from the ∆-1 plane, while entropy is the inverse of social evolution, and twice the social evolution of a beings is its emergence as a super organism, a humind that becomes a prophet cloned in the mind of believers to emerge as a social whole, a star that evolves into a black hole mind of the galaxy and so on…

A better way to cast the connection between the 5th Ðimotion and reality though is to establish 5 clear forms of social organization, combination of the previous 4 elements with the element of social evolution: a language, which is the social representation of the whole by the 1st Ðimotion of the mind;  a  herd, which has its main purpose as a wave of the 2nd Ðimotion of locomotion; an ecosystem in which the 4th Ðimotion of entropic darwinian processes take place, an organism, which is the evolution of the 3rd reproductive Ðimotion and a super organism, which is an organism of organisms, the 5th natural form that ‘tops’ all the possible states and processes of existence, coming therefore the conclusion that with the concept of a supœrganism all other concepts Ðimotions and its combinations can be cast.

The entanglement of all those layers of reality is so profound it cannot be cast on the usual systems of thought of the humind, so we are becoming creative with the language: 5 e-motions correspond to the pentagonal logic of sensations of the mind; and are the basis of a psychological stience. 5 loco-motions correspond to the 2nd Ðimotion studied by physics.  5 iterations correspond to the 3rd Ðimotion of reproduction; 5 extinctions to the modes of entropy, and 5 evolutions to the 5 forms of social organization.

We can then create a ¬Æ topological stience of the ‘variations’ of composite dimotions similar to the topological stience of varieties of complex manifolds, which is of great use and we shall apply extensively in the 3rd and fourth line to the understanding of the different variations of species – which in fact is a process of combinations of ternary simplex topologies in different hierarchical orders.

Of the 5 Ðimotions the less accepted by the egocy paradox is the most important – the will of the mind and its program of existence carried by its 5 e-motions, likely associated closed to the sensation of the 5 locomotions with the mind uses to perceive existence.

We shall deal with those processes though in this post with a composite approach that will put in relationship the behavior produced by those e-motions and the geometry and outcome of relationships, both destructive and constructive according to topology.

 Asy♣metric= Antisy♠metric ± Sy♥metric± Disy♦metric Logic.

The metric of the 5 Ðimotions of time§paces has properties that are entangled albeit expressed in different manners by the different languages that perceive them. The 5 Dimotions differ topo-logically, as both its geometry in motion (topology in space)  and logic causality in time  is different. For example a Darwinian event implies the cutting through perpendicular geometries tearing the variety of our topological organs, predated; an act of communication requires on the other hand a parallel motion to allow communication at equal distances of the subtle, ∆-3 pixels an ∆º mind uses to that aim.

When we study the actions of survival across scales, their functions and perspective also differs from the sadistic ministrations we make to the oysters we ‘love’ to torture with lemon to the view the oyster terrified will have in its inner point of view of the monster that eats her alive; and finally in the last layer of reality, perception itself of sensations that reinforce the program of actions, it is a different sensation of exhilarating pleasure an entropy action, that the acute pain of informative knowledge of truth, or the pressure-pain associated to the social evolution into choking herds that inflict order upon us.

All those layers of reality are related to the four elements of the being, its space, its time, its scale and its mind, which provide simultaneous, topological; sequential-logic; sensorial, perceptive and organic biological ± prey-predator scalar elements to all functions of existence.

MIND AS A SCALAR TRAVELLER WITH PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL AND ASCENDING MOTIONS.

We stated that the mind creates and destroys reality through its 5 survival actions that happen with ‘different angles’ of motion regarding the fifth dimension of scales. We love those who are equal to us, we obey the whole above us, we feed on the lower elements, where we also seed just in the ¡-1 scale…

So how can we treat logically the different angles the mind adopts regarding the scales of the fifth dimension?

Simple speaking with the concept of logic symmetries and its diversities, which are both topological and biological, behavioral actions, such as.

– We are in parallel symmetry with those equal clones we herd with to ‘ascend’ into the whole through the social scales of the 5th Ðimotion.

-We are in complementary disymetry when we come with a couple to form the simples social grouping for reproductive purposes, (3rd Ðimotion)

-We are as a whole in the arrow of life self-reflecting being an asymmetric super organism with 3 different parts which converge into the body-wave: Limbs/Potentials=>body wave<=particle/head. And vice versa, in the arrow of death the asymmetry explodes into the 2 parts of the being:

Limbs/potentials>= bodywave =< particle/head, splitting it, in the 4th Ðimotion of entropic death.

– We establish antisymmetric relationships with systems below us from where we extract energy and form in darwinian relationships in the first and fourth Dimotion of informative and energy feeding.

So the topological expression of the Ðimotions as actions of existence can be observed as different forms of symmetry, which has a direct real implication in the analysis of physical systems and biological forms, but must be accompanied with functional, behavioral traits.

The mind we can say in the most formal topologic analysis constantly switches its moral angle of functional relationship as it changes modular actions in its constant switch between the 5 Ðimotions of exist¡enœ.

Science tries to create an illusion of abstract neutrality with no ‘survival, emotional grades to it’. But behavior is ruled by the topology of similarity, which might be considered spiritually as a force of love between equal beings, geometrically as a degree of congruence and biologically as an strategy of survival, and logically as an aesthetically measure…

We shall use 3 terms to relate the 3 forms in which an ‘amorphous’ asymmetric system acquires a given topological symmetry with clear functions, and for fun we use the French card to ‘shuffle’ the 4 suits, which we place between the ‘defining’ first letters and the metric, which is different for each ‘suit’, and as the 3 metric that are ‘meaningful’ in forma and function come from an ‘asymmetric’ whole we write then.

  • ∆œ Asy♣metric: ≤≥, The club  for asymmetric systems from where the ternary possible paths of the future come:
  • ∆±¡ Antisy♠metric: > , <, The pikes, a warrior instrument for anti-symmetric, perpendicular, darwinian events and forms.
  • ∑∆o≈∆+1 Sy♥metric: ≈: the hearts->love symbol for the parallel symmetry which brings things together through a common language of communication.
  • ∆ø: S≈T, O x | Disy♦metric systems: ≥,  the mirror, complementary symmetry that is the origin of gender differentiation and allows the processes of reproduction.

So those 4 functional, formal operandi which we also relate to the 3 informative, >, balanced, ≈ and entropic < symbols:

All of them co-exist in an asymmetric amorphous system, symmetry is parallel in herds, it merges both elements in disymmetric mirror systems, and it is hierarchical destructive, entropic an in antisymmetric processes. ♣

And they are the best way to merge in the entangled Universe Scalar, topological and biological, temporal properties as perceived by the actions of the mind, embodying the fundamental ‘higher form of truth’ of any statement of reality – one in which we merge the whole properties of scales, mind, time and space: ∆@ST.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the ‘Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

The generator is thus the simplest formula, which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scales in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle. Since for a dimension to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its  constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scales. The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum. So we can define all systems as an ensemble of  lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through  3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death. So we can define its 5Dimensions in time through its worldcycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.

Spheres that hold the maximal volume of information in particle-heads; flat, lineal topologies – the fastest distance in moving potentials/limbs – and hyperbolic, iterative body waves that generate all the forms, are the 3 only topologies of the Universe, which ensemble to form the ‘present-spatial super organisms’ we see in each ∆-scale. So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

|-moving limbs/potentials  x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.

So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

The 2 jargons of this blog: simpler logic and complex operandi views.

So we are now becoming ‘inflationary’ as all mind languages are, establishing 2 ‘models of I-logic thought’, a simpler more intuitive way of writing the Generator equation, which introduces common terms of classic science and uses the simpler terms we define for the Metic 5D equation will be then:

$p > E x I >  ðƒ

Whereas a limb/potential dimotion system, $p, will be the simplest lineal distance-motion that will evolve as energy (maximal size, minimal form) and information (maximal form, minimal size), in a second body-wave age, E x I, before it be=comes curved into an informative particle-head or singularity, ðƒ.

In that sense the concepts of common use, ‘energy and information’, require a conceptual upgrading, as both merge and come together into body-waves, increasingly becoming transformed one into the other in the vital cycles of the body wave, whose ‘power’ is maximal when E= I -> Max. E x I.

And the complex view that first introduces some of the key operandi that will become fundamental to translate mathematical science into T.œ.

In the more complex model for example, the third reproductive demotion of a system, e x i, can be viewed as the merging of two different realities, lineal, entropic motion, and cyclical, informative stillness, limbs and minds that merge into the combined e x i: ∑ ∏, body-wave. Energy herds though can be easily ad up by superposition (∑). Thus we obtain in the complex model the proper operandi that will be essential to the study of quantitative  body-waves.

So body-waves herds of energy are simpler than in-form-ative elements, which tend to form more complex networks, with internal connections through its ‘body-parts’, so we use the multiplicative symbol. Information then in any ‘confined’ system, such as T.œs surrounded by membranes are, tend to be dominated by the informative element and its networks.

Same happens with the more complex 4th and 5th dimotions of entropy and social evolution, which we write with the 2 fundamental operations of analysis that are the best way to study those dimotions, ∂S and ∫T.

And this has very important consequences, for the long term existence of the being.

Indeed; what is the ‘sum of all the Dimotions of the being; through its existence’?

Simply speaking the worldcycle of existence of the being between ‘birth=generation’ and extinction:

This simple ‘first views’ on how to combine the 5 dimotions of reality shows truly the real way in which the Universe becomes complex: by combinatorics, which indeed increase ginormously the number of variations and permutations even with a few elements.

Combinatorics with its latter ad ons of spatial statistics and temporal probability are for that reason an essential field of the ‘mirror-language’ of mathematics that so well ‘summarizes’ the laws of T.œ,when we fully understand mathematics as what it is not an axiomatic but an experi≈mental stience, that is a mental mirror of reality more efficient and better fit to the task that the ambiguous words (more subtle though to understand fully the entangled connections as its words are branching into sub-texts), similar to the visual direct view from where both depart.

The purpose of this post is to describe the ‘ternary fractal generator of space-time superorganisms’ with the jargon of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean ‘I-logic geometry‘, the upgraded formalism of logic and mathematics needed to describe a ‘vital, fractal Universe’.

We concluded that to fully understand reality we must upgrade and reorder our view of simultaneous space, which is ternary in its adjacent topologies that form simultaneous superorganisms, and sequential time, which is cyclical, and broken in infinite time clocks.

To that aim we found a 5th Dimension of scalar space-time, in which systems remain co-invariant, as they accelerate its time clocks, when they become smaller: $p x ðƒ = K. This is the mathematical (Klein) definition of a dimension of space-time that allows to travel through it as we slow down and grow in size, through the world cycle of life and death.

We found the reason for that metric in the internal co-ordination of the parts of a larger system, which slow down its external, measurable synchronous clock as a whole. So larger wholes have more internal structure that diminish its speed as a whole.

So the simplest Generator equation of reality would be the 5D metric equation in its spatial ‘still image’: $p x ðƒ = K.

We can then write it through the constant increase of information of system with the symbols of > involution of information and < expansion of lineal spacetime and dissolution of information, as a series of actions that ad on to a worldcycle:

$p >  e x i > ðƒ << $p, whereas $p means a relative lineal past of maximal extension in Space and minimal information, energy x information, the balanced classic age of reproduction, ðƒ, the third future age of increasing information, which in the moment of entropic death, <<, implies a massive erasing of information and growth of entropy, and dissolution of the structures of the system.

Finally we can add to this  simplest expression of the generator, its ternary symmetries in ‘scales’ of size (¡±1), as we are born in an ∆-1 seminal scale, emerge in our ∆o individual scale where we interact with an ∆+1 social world, to dive back in the moment of death to the ∆-1 plane.

And we can also extend the  ∑e x ∏ i, present, intermediate state of maximal balance, in the emergent ∆ø scale, with the 3 topologies of space (|xO≈Ø) that defines the 3 adjacent topological parts of all organisms, |-moving limbs/potentials < Ø-hyperbolic body waves > O-informative particle/heads.

So we obtain a quite descriptive generator equation of all T.œs in time, space and scale, through its worldcycle between seminal birth and entropic death, without the need for the more formal Ðisomorphisms of timespace:

Γ.œ ≈ ∆œ-1 (seed): ∑œ-1>∆ø:  |-$t > Ø∑e≈∏i > O- §ðƒ << ∆-1: $p

The reader then should assess the interest of learning the simple symbols of ¬Æ to be able to write ‘general laws’ that apply to all relative ∆±¡ planes of reality.

In the next graph and following paragraphs we try to explain those equations as simple as they get – since truly ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’.

Let us start with a briefing taken from other posts of the Universe, as it is, when described with the new properties of topological ternary space, ternary scales and ternary time ages.

The Rashomon multiple truths and Disomorphic method applied to the mind.

Let us finally see the 3rd approach to those dimotions as exchanges of motion and form ‘energy and information’ between scales of reality, considering first the vital view of the 5 dimotions (a simple application of the Rashomon effect) and then connect those time space ‘fast actions’ in a sequential order to see how they define in the long time view a clear arrow of increasing life information that will finally explode back into entropy defining the world cycle of existence of all beings.

 

VITAL processes are THUS the whys of all abstract topological configurations. And dualities and ternary symmetries are the elements that construct those configurations as all is yin yang and qi, that is motion, form and energy that combines them. Easy? Isn’t?

You and anything else, is just a super organism of space-time ‘dust’:

s≈t, spatial minds (S@), ≈body waves of energy and cyclical membranes, ∆ð.

And so properly written we talk of a Universe of five elements we shall always use as the bare theoretical minimum to acquire meaningful information about an event or form of space-time.

Finally to intoduce the meaning of truth in languages, as we only perceive reality from a linguistic mirror of the mind, which means absolute truth only happens in the being which has all the information about itself:

Total truth of the being = One (probability, one being) in the being in itself.

So an external observer only will have a linguistic mirror view, with less information. And as each language is better fit to extract different properties (math, spatial; logic, temporal; sight, space-time; ethics, social and so on), it is best a kaleidoscopic view of the being with different languages, to extract the maximal information):

Maximal truth of the being = ∑ linguistic points of view on the 5th dimensions of the entity, (∆@S≈T).

This is the justification of the Rashomon method of casting 5 different perspectives in ceteris paribus analysis often with different languages, to extract its maximal information; which in the more complete “Disomorphic method’ (3rd line) will double in space and time symmetries the perception of the being through a dual qualitative=quantiative, time=space symmetric perspective with 10 ‘different analysis’ of increasing complexity that develop the being from its initial seed to its plugging within the larger Universe of social scale and discontinuous planes from where it absorbs its energy and information…

So the study of the 5 elements that conform any ‘time§pace organism of the Universe’, its fractal scales and actions, its spatial forms and super organisms, and its temporal motions masterminded by the @-mind or system that connects all its parts, feels it as a whole and puts it in motion in the outside world… but will finally become disordered by entropy in a larger world, is what gives us the total truth of the being. 

And we use a simplified 5D³ analysis of it, and a more ‘dynamic’ generational analysis departing from the o-mind or seed of a still form of information, which generates through its actions, the reproductive wave of clones that build the social networks that emerge as a being in an upper scale of reality, live through its 3 ages as a super organism, act in an external world through its social scales and finally die. This is the content of the third line, explained for each species in the fourth line, where we shall for each scale define its 5г¡motions and then its stages of evolution for seed through emerging being to dying form.

We shall study then under the Rashomon 5D³ truths and the 11 elements of the Disomorphic method, equal in all dimensional beings, the different perspectives of those planes and main species, which are self-centered in the humind, ∆±4 planes – the last of which is outside the galaxy and its light space-time, the limit of our perception.

ÐISOMORPHIC METHOD

The 3rd and fourth lines of the blog (and some parts dedicated to astrophysics due to its love for formalism) are written with the enhanced research provided by the Disomorphic method that ads to the abc of the scientific method – a new leg, the D-isomorphisms of space-time beings:

  • Accurate data + scientific rational models that must be…
  • Bio-topologic, organic by reason of the fractal, scalar structure of space-time, and predict
  • Cyclical patterns of events that must reproduce into the future (predictability of models)… the
  • Disomorphic Method: description of the system as a T.œ, defined by 5 dimensions of space, which structure the topological organism, 5 motions of time that define its world cycle and 5 actions across scales that ensure its survival and form a program of exist¡ence for all species:

The disomorphic Method considers two levels of analysis of all Time-Space Organisms (ab.T.œ): a simple analysis of the ‘Fractal generator’ and its 5 Demotions as dimensions of space that form a simultaneous super organism, motions in time that shape a world cycle and in the lower scale of shorter actions, the scalar exchanges of energy and information that allow the system to survive providing motion to its limbs/potentials, energy to its body-wave, information to its particle-head (simplex motions that define the male gender); while reproducing and evolving socially the system with similar forms (complex dimotions that ensure the survival beyond its individual life and define the ‘female’ S=T gender.) Such 3 x 5 description of the motions, dimensions and actions of the system is then complemented by a more diachronic analysis on how a single species goes through its world cycle of life and death, starting from a seed of information, taken ‘still pictures’ of that world cycle through the main stages of its existence as a travel through emerging scales of the fifth dimension:

1st Ðimotion: informative particles/heads: §ð 2 Ð: limb/potential momenta: st. 3rd Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏, ST. 4th Ðimotion: entropy: ∂S. 5th Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.   The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scales in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle. Since for a dimension to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its  constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scales. The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum. So we can define all systems as an ensemble of  lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through  3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death. So we can define its 5Dimensions in time through its worldcycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.Ðisomorphic method studies in a vital, sequential time manner the world cycle of beings. As such is the equivalent in time of the Generator equation of supœrganisms and its compressed Rashomon method of 5 ternary asymmetric ‘truths-points of view’ of the system, a more static democratic spatial expression, on how systems co-exist in space. In time though they are guided by a hierarchical singularity point, the will of existence, the still mapping language, the inner parts of the fractal point-mind whose ‘travel through the 5th dimension of space-time’  is the ultimate meaning of existence. We divide that travel into a generational sequence, departing from an ∆-1 seed (fractal points), which generate as it emerges from the o-1 unit sphere into a larger 1-∞ Universe a series of asymmetric actions reproducing 3 physiological networks that create the being as an ∆º species of that larger ∆+1 world, where it will live through the 3±∆ ages of existence, studied in detail through its 8 life-cycles, traveling/interacting through social scales as it forms part of a lager super organism, and through the 9 perceived planes of reality, in which it will perform those asymmetric actions of survival (aeiou:motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction and social evolution). So the Universe in all its magnificent iterative perspective or any of its fractal parts reduces to this ‘simple game of exis=t¡ence.

How we shall do this is specific of general systems sciences, the name of this blog – a science born at the Macy Congress, when at the death of Einstein, the highest minds of the world met, aware that a Universe only constructed as physics wants with a single arrow of entropy≈motion as the future of time, lacking a proper understanding of information, the other inverse arrow, could not account for the whys of the Universe. Then the concept of an organic Universe dedicated to reproduce information appeared as an alternative philosophy of science. It was understood also that such a Universe would require a new set of laws, based in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings, common to all of them – as the laws of enteric motion were common also to all species.

So the word isomorphism was coined to define those common laws. But for fifty years scientists couldn’t find a formalism for its science, as they lacked the key understanding of the origin of information, or form, stored in the frequency and form of closed clocks of time. And we will return to that.

In any case, at the fiftieth anniversary of Macy’s, there was a huge meeting in Silicon valley (Sonoma University) of the main researchers of the science, where I hold then the chair of Duality (the foundational science that studies those models of the Universe with the arrows of entropy and information), introducing the missing element to achieve the formalism – the relationship between time and information on one side, and space and entropy on the other – thus putting in relationship the fundamental substances of reality, space and time, and its dynamic quanta, ‘entropic lineal motions’ and ‘cyclical forms, and time frequencies’. 

And then considered derived from those first principles 12 sets of common laws to all beings made of space-time, called ‘isomorphisms’, which we will define in the third line and apply to all systems of reality. This is therefore the ‘new method’ of ‘stiences’, we shall develop in this blog, showing that all laws of all species derive of those 12 isomorphisms.

The method of GST IS SIMPLE though repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with four elements, three dimensions of scales, three topological dimensions of space, which form super organisms with three ages/dimensions of time, all supervised by the will of survival of a mind.

Thus we talk of 4 elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºst-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 3×4 = 12 isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.

And this is what we do in the third line of this blog, which resumes the essence of the existence of all beings, studied in the fourth line in detail with the 4 x 3 different views of their existence, from the p.o.v. of its mind: ‘O-Linguistic monads generate 4±∆ actions’… of its spatial organism: ‘…forming constant networks’… of its temporal world cycle: ‘…moving as ageing species through’ … of its scalar structure ’10 social scales and 10 social planes of the fifth dimension≈God (mind of the Universe). So for any entity of reality we will be able to describe with those 4×3≈ 12 elements, of the ∆ºst being, all its properties, events and parts, as a ternary organism in space, living through three scales of the fifth dimension, three ages of time between its generation and extinction.

The Universe then can be defined as a fractal that creates and erases constantly super organisms of information, traveling in worldcycles through the fifth dimension of space-time. Those are the thoughts of God, each detail, each of usa variation made to its image and likeness.

The 3 principles of a T.Œ: duality of space-time, åctions and 5 Dimensional planes.

A true Theory Of Everything, beyond the limited scope of the Unification Theories of physicists, which at best attempt to unify the 4 fields of energy of physical systems, requires to understand the 3 Unifying Principles derived from the 3 elements of all Realities, Internal, Vital Space, Cyclical Times and the fractal, isomorphic planes of Space-time that form together the 5th dimension, in which all those space-time beings co-exist:

  • The Duality and Inverse properties of Lineal Space and Cyclical Time.

That all systems co-existing in a given scale of reality are made of time cycles, which enclose a certain ‘vital space with motion and energy’ (Jordan theorem – a closed curve encloses a space), and hence break the absolute space-time into infinite fractal parts, which share similar properties, natural to the essence of ‘lineal, open spatial motions’  vs. cyclical closed clock motions. Thus a T.œ. will be always based in the properties of the 2 inverse formal motions of reality, closed time cycles vs. lineal space motions, from closed and open strings to, closed, inward vortices of mass/quarks vs. open, expansive electrons; from energetic males to informative, reproductive females; from lineal momentum to angular momentum. Thus we must depart from a thorough exploration of this duality and its properties to build up the inverse symmetries of reality.

Now this duality has an enormous number of different perspectives. And the most important is the relationship between time cycles and information encoded in the form and frequency of those cycles, on one side, and space and energy, stored in the microscopic ‘quanta’ that creates a given space, defined mathematically as a surface of ‘non-Euclidean fractal points’, which create the illusion of a continuous medium given its smallness. So water seems a continuous volume but it is made of atoms, air of molecules and vacuum space, we shall see is also likely composed of magnetic constants and/or strings.

  • The 5 Actions of Space-time of all Survival Systems.

Because systems are made of 3 parameters, space, time and its scales, there are only 5 possible åctions: internal and external space and time absorption and emission, and aggregation of similar parts into wholes of higher scales or disintegration of wholes into parts.

And so this 5 ‘åctions of existence’ , changes in motions ∆a or ∂a (accelerations), ∆e-nergy, ∆observer’s perception, i-teration in an offspring ∆u-niversals, become the program of existence, the unifying will of survival, the time events we see in all systems of Nature, the ∂ æ,e,ï,œ,û of reality. We have written it as ∆e or in mathematical equations as ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û) because often, specially in mathematical physics, we will be able to express this program in terms of mathematical equations and physical laws.

Now it doesn’t matter that those 4 essential åctions of existence are coded by logic cycles imprinted geometrically in a chip, by biological, circadian cycles, imprinted in neuronal cycles, by 5 genetic letters in biological systems, or by 4+i quantum numbers, each one coding, one of those existential åctions for particles.

What matters is the unifying power of those 5 åctions of existence define a survival, automatic program that makes ‘immortal’ through repetitive generations the species that follow them.

So we could consider a function of existence that resumes the internal space and time of the system, called ‘momentum’, which is the ‘quantity’ that physical systems try to preserve and increase, mv (for systems on our scale of reality) intensity (for electric flows) and so on, which embodies the internal time clocks of the material system (q or m, charges and masses which are cyclical vortices of electronic and gravitational forces x   its lineal speed, v).

  • The Scalar planes of space-time of the 5th

But we need not only to understand what all those systems have in common (their space-time substance and the space-time åctions they perform to survive) but to classify their differences. That is, paraphrasing Einstein, not only to understand ‘the thoughts of god’, but its details. How can then classify all those internal clocks of time and fractal, vital spaces, broken by those cycles to instill some order on the infinite variety of the Universe.

The key is the 5th of those åctions, social ‘evolution. The last of those letters, the u of Universals, the social evolution of parts into wholes defines the absolute space-time arrow, as particles gather into atoms that gather into molecules, cells and states of matter, organisms and celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond, in a series of ‘Universal planes of growing social organization, which follow certain clear rules of social evolution.

We call the sum of all those social wholes of growing size, the 5th dimension of the Universe. Since they seem to occupy the same space-time. Indeed, you are a whole, but you have cells and atoms. How they all those system co-exist? This conundrum of all sciences, how wholes and parts co-exist, how particles are also waves, what is the relationship between quantum atoms and whole galaxies? Etc. is the theme of the 5th dimension, which studies the laws of co-existence of different ‘planes of space-time’. And again we will be able to mathematize but also understand in organic, biological terms, such ‘multiple planes of existence’.

2 elements will be the key to this organization: Systems perform their åctions across those planes. So systems feed in smaller parts. Systems accumulate information in cellular micro-particles. Systems transfer energy and information between its relative planes of different size and information.

And all those systems form together a ‘5th scalar dimension’, whose metric (laws of organization), ARE the mathematical and logic tool that will allow us to organize all those fractal cycles and vital spaces in a meaningful manner, to understand its 3 fundamental properties: organic, biological survival properties, geometric, mathematical properties, and causal temporal properties. Since, as we grow in spatial size, our time cycles become slower. So rats have faster metabolisms than elephants, black holes turn faster than bigger stars, Kepler’s laws show that smaller orbits of planets are faster, vortices show that closer to its center, they run faster, chips process faster information the smaller they are, genetic clocks process faster and accumulate more information than larger bodies etc.

  • All together the 3 formal elements of scalar space-time, can be generated by a fractal generator whose existential algebra, and partial equations define the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe, which allow us to study in great detail each of the varieties of the fractal generator, what we call a species of reality along the different scales of the 5th

And so we need to conclude the study of the Universe with a philosophical understanding of the organic nature of the pantheist, sentient Universe, whose bio-topo-logic isomorphisms are closer to the philosophical worldview of Eastern culture than to the abstract, Abrahamic, anthropomorphic, subconscious philosophy origin of the western way of doing science.

Lao, Buddha, Aristotle, Leibniz, those are the masters, which understood that mathematics, biology and metaphysics go all together.

But we now have to go well beyond them, creating a logic and formal structure for relational fractal space-time cycles of the same strict accuracy and infinitely.

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.

That is, all space-time events from the perspective of knowledge, of scientific information, starts with an observer’s points of view, an act of information from a zero-point, o, ∆ï. The point perceives normally a form or external motion which interests it, and feels attracted or detracted from contact. It might be argued that the motion started before the observer. But we do have a scientific, informative point of view. Thus it is more proper than the O-bserver comes first with its observation of a cycle of space-time, which through a medium that transfers information and motion, a wave therefore of ExI, he observes.

This ∆ï then might end there or go further into the next action, an acceleration, that is a change of direction or speed in the entity of existence. ∆a.

Which depending on the predator-prey-clone (energetic bigger or smaller form, or parallel form with whom to communicate) it will imply 3 different type of motions:

– Away from the predator or closer to the prey (which however now might enter into the game and establish a dual play, where relative motions interplay).

– Parallel to its clone to start communication at fixed R-distance… which might establish a certain angular momentum or tension force.

Let us consider the most likely action, which will be one of positive or negative exchange of energy, ±∆Sp, feeding or being food. Once a certain number of such åctions are created along some of increase of information and perception, in parallel with a sexual clone, then we move to the immortal strategy of the game:

∆œ: iteration of individuals, reproduction of information. Indeed, if we have gone properly through an ∆EI, a dual exchange of energy and information, that information internal to the individual might iterate reproduce into a new being. We prefer the term iteration as it is the mathematical concept of fractal theory: generator equations of fractal iterate in feedback processes the functional (the function of existence in this case) of the being.

And then, because ∆œ will be in the ∆-1 scale and then after its emergence, an individual of a social ∆+1 scale, there will be naturally social evolution or devolution in the U+1 scale, which ends with the death of the system, its descent to the U-1->-2 scale as it becomes erased.

Now the reader will be surprised that we use a metaphysical term, ‘existence’, but it is proper of a theory which tries to explain the ultimate whys of reality which can be resumed in a simple wording:

‘why things exist and cease to exist and then are repeated in new generations to cease to exist, across time. What is the meaning of that ‘worldcycle’ of existence that all beings follow?

 The function of existence describes any ‘system’ in the Universe – and that is the beauty of it – as a simple structure, a series of cycles of time, imprinted over an energy body/wave field, which ‘moves’ through a larger space-time world, in which it exchanges quanta of energy and bits of information, can have an infinity of varieties.

 

Τhe 9±1 Disomorphisms of the Universe. 

How can systematise those 3 elements into a formal model of the organic Universe, which can be further explored by future scientists? Τhe answer is the concept of isomorphic laws, which dates back to the work of the founder of this science in modern terms, Mr. Bertalanffy. So we structure the blog around this concept fully developed in this web.

Basically what Bertalanffy proposed is that a ‘scientific Universe’, which could be self-explained by the laws of organisms, must be proved to follow in all its systems, the same organic laws, which would be therefore iso=equal morphic= in form. At the time the science was in its infancy and it remain so for 50 more years, as there was no formalism to express the insights of similar laws in all disciplines, till in the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the sciences of cybernetics, information, complexity and systems, I was invited by the president of the founding association of those sciences, and explained the key to such formalism – the understanding of the laws of the 5th dimension, and the fractal nature of space and time, its relationship with energy-motion (as space has quantum energy-motion) and information (as time clocks carry he information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles).

Such simplification of the elements of which we are all made, which equates space and lineal motion and time and cyclical form, thus establishes the cause of all the isomorphisms of the Universe and its systems as we are all made of space and time and so the properties of space and time and the laws that connect parts and wholes through networks – the laws of the 5th dimension – is all what is needed.

Hence we shall establish for those 3 elements, which correspond to the 3 main disciplines of mathematical logic (space->geometry, time->algebra, 5D-> analysis), 3 x 3 sets of isomorphic laws, related to those 3 elements, fractal space, cyclical time and 5D scales, put together in all systems by he most fascinating element of the Universe, the 0-minds or mental, linguistic points of view, which coordinate and integrate together all the elements of a super organisms. 

So all the posts of this web are descriptions of scientific systems as fractal≈5D space-time beings, which display 3 x 3 isomorphic type of laws and are integrated by a mental ‘monad’, or integrative system of information, the mind and nervous system in biology; the crystal system in material forms, the chip in robots, the gravitational  black hole in galaxies, the capital in nations and its governments, the prophet and its code of information or memes and books of revelation in civilisations, the DNA nuclei in cells and so on.

It is a simple and not malicious Universe if humans wanted to understand with the same properties they have. But humans don’t. It is all about ego and putting man on top. And frankly lacking a humble ethics more proper of eastern cultures,

Τhus, for reasons that are of not interest to the reader, personal, cultural and of activism against the nuclear industry, despite the interest of american scholars for this model I did not follow that tiresome work of penpal, pen paper and pen-thagonal work – since today money in these sciences is in computers, robots and weapons, the machines fast evolving into organisms that can easily displace us on top of this planet. So, as humans do not seem interested in using knowledge to evolve mankind but the machine, I abandoned the scholar field and dedicated fully to activism. Now, retired of all things human I will pour thousands of pages of analysis on G.S.Τ.General Systems Τheory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and the Generator equation of fractal Space-Τime, its formalism in this web.

It will be done in iterative, repetitive more detailed analysis because the Universe is a repetitive mandala.

In the next chapter of this central point we introduce loosely in 10 sections the 10 isomorphisms, corresponding to the first line above, which expands this loose study. In the second line/chapter of this post, we introduce the main systems of biological, physical and social character as organic systems. In the 3rd chapter line above, its 10 isomorphic sets of laws.  And finally in the 4th line of hard science, each one studied a scale of reality we order all the laws known to science according to those 10 isomorphisms.

  • 3 isomorphisms related to the organic structure in space of all systems
  • 3 isomorphisms related to its motions in time and world cycles of existence
  • 3 isomorphisms related to its co-existence as part of a 5D of multiple scales.
  • And the 10th isomorphism of the linguistic mind and will of perception, which orders them all.

The purpose of the living Universe: Reproduction of space-time presents.

Now of course, this r=evolution of human thought will take time to impose itself, if humans do have such time left. As it requires to go to the origins of science, its mathematical and logic languages and evolve them further. This Einstein knew when he said ‘I am the only physicist who seems to know there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, moving at different speeds, Leibniz was right but if so we will have to change the scaffolding of science from its inception’. So he settled for a smaller change, applying the 5th non-Euclidean postulate to bend space into infinite time cycles.

When I confronted the mathematical formalism of the 5th dimension, I realized I had to go further on that path, and define all the undefined terms of mathematics, which since the discovery of the Non-Euclidean postulate that let infinite parallels cross a point had been undefined.

This was no solution though. Hilbert’s Axiomatic method of NOT  defining points, planes and lines (‘I imagine points, planes and lines’ he started in his famous ‘foundations of geometry’, the seminal book of XX c. mathematics), DOES NOT work in serious science. You cannot start without definitions of your initial postulates. The result was as bad as Euclid with his definition of a ‘point with no breath’.

So 5D metrics is born on a more healthy redefinition of mathematical postulates, as we redefine a ‘fractal point’, whose breath grows as we enlarge our information of it – making again mathematics realist as a science. Look around, you only see ‘points’, which grow when you see them closer and then they can fit infinite parallels. THAT WAS THE SOLUTION to the contradiction of a point with infinite parallels. It was  a Point of the 5th dimension. A point that grew in scale. And so a line was a series of points with breath -a WAVE! Thus the principle ‘wave-particle’ was embedded in mathematics, and so quantum physics started to streamline.

Then I realized those points broke reality into inner and outer regions. Thus planes were networks, fractal networks of points joined by flows of energy and information. Consider yourself. You are made of cell-points joined by informative, nervous networks and energetic, blood networks. And the point of maximal communication, your brain, was at the centre of your networks.

But the beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in its capacity to describe all beings with so few elements, and hence its constant recurrence in all languages and philosophies.

Indeed, this ternary structure with a mind at its centre, is the conclusion of the 6 biggest philosophers of science of the human tradition:

-Buddha and the Indian tradition of Atmans as souls which are knots communicated with the external world.

-Aristotle with his concept of a self-centred mind that moves a finite body, as its fixed God, of which there are ∞ in the Universe – ‘we are all Gods’ is said to have exclaimed.

-Descartes with his concept of minds that perceive worlds put by some devilish construction, with the rest extensa and time vortices it observes in the Universe.

– Leibniz with his concept of monads, as knots of information, mirrors of the external universe.

-Riemann and Einstein with his concept of points, through which ∞ parallels can cross.

The conclusion is obvious: the entire history of human knowledge appears filled with insights on the fractal paradigm, which were not properly interpreted.

Since Humanity excessively impressed by its first machines of measure has been blind to that obvious organic reality; where man as the most perfect organism of the Universe, is indeed ‘the measure of all things’ and the machine a primitive organism of metal.

Only now when we build robots as organisms, imitating life, we realise that mechanisms are simple organisms, and only now when we see the Universe together in all its co-existing scales, we realise physical and mechanical systems are also fractal super organisms. 

And all of them can be defined in space as ternary structures and in time as ternary ages, hence as super organisms tracing world cycles, through 3 fractal scales in the 5th dimension, giving origin to the Fractal i-logic Generator that resumes all what exists its parts in space, functions in time and space-time actions of survival, as organic systems that feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially into larger networks, which are the 4 canonical definitions of a life being

Thus you are in a living Universe, a living fractal of species made to the image and likeness of the whole.

I know that the simplicity of the Fractal Generator of the Universe baffles scholars, who think they know much more, and that the Universe cannot be ‘so simple and not malicious’ (Einstein).  In that regard it is more likely that you will grasp the beauty of the Universe if you are not a ‘pro’ scholar, just interested in the details that come from those thoughts of God. Of course in the web there are thousands of details and if scholars wanted to connect this simple Fractal Generator to their complex details, they would be able as i have done for 30 years,  but it is not the work of a single man, to connect and explain all their variations and species with the concept of a Universe made of fractal ternary space-time beings, organised as super organisms across at least 3 scales of reality, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-individual/organic and ∆+1 social/cosmological scales.

Now I am happy enough if you have read so far. At this point either you will be the kind of people who can learn and you are in the web that better mirrors the fractal Universe, among human beings. Or you are the kind of people who cannot get out of his mind, self-centred beliefs, and huge amount of information (disordered but looking good). And you won’t continue. I am not a good teacher and rather write because it makes me feel the Mandala of the Universe, unconcerned with those who might mirror my mirror. Still i like others to share that communion of the spirit that comes with the humble realisation we are made to the image and likeness of the whole, God/mind of the Universe. Westerners in that sense with their huge ego and abrahamic deluded religions of man as the chosen will have a more difficult task. Asians will find here the scientific mirror of their philosophies of yin-formative time-visnhu, yang-energetic space-shiva, and the infinite beings that combined them.

But once we have a clear picture of the elements and equations that generate the fractal Universe with its duality between the arrows of entropic space and informative time cycles, it will be much easier than it seems, to adequate all sciences to the fractal paradigm. If you want to do it, if you want to go back to school, if you want to refocus and repair your ego-centered mirror.

NOW we will be conceptual more than mathematical. Yes, there is a fractal equation that explains the distribution of galaxies in space, but this how is trivial. It is much more important to describe a galaxy as a fractal of stars, with an organic structure similar to a cell, with star mitochondria, black hole DNA and all the organic processes of birth, evolution and destruction of those galaxies. THIS IS THE core matter of this web: the study of the superorganims of the Universe, with verbal conceptual, biological laws. Only on the section of physics and mathematics we get heavily into quantitative numbers and, as we keep building the web, I will pour around 5.000 pages of analysis of physical, mathematical and astronomical systems. But that will take time. It will be the final phase of this construction. So in the 2nd line we have the organic study, the 4th line we will have the formal one.

Why we do so is obvious: humans have done a good job, specially with the help of computers to develop and exhaust the mathematical properties of the Universe and its fractal parts. They have done however an extremely lousy job on developing formal, logic models of its time cycles, causal processes, time dimensions, organic properties and so we are filling more that gap. Now if we didn’t think in words but in maths, all this would be unneeded.

Just thinking on calculus, it would be obvious that finitesimal fractal structures correspond to the discipline of analysis; just thinking on geometry & topology, we would realise that space is an organic fractal of the 3 canonical topologies of the Universe, and just think on algebraic groups and transformations we would realise of the complex logic of the 3 arrows of time, which are at the hear tot all the equations with 3 elements, F(x) operandi, G(y)… That is, if we were mathematical minds we would know that the 3 elements of the Universe correspond to the 3 branches of mathematics, 5D scalar analysis, temporal algebra and spatial geometry.

But we are verbal beings, so we need first to understand the mirror-language of words and its 3 elements, the subject-informative element, the object, energetic element and the action-verb or space-time element.

And we are visual beings, so we need to understand the codes of blue-information, red-energy and green-reproduction our mind uses to see the Universe. You see, languages are many but they try all to be ternary mirrors of the fractal generator, as beings are. Ultimately you then in a sentient, organic, linguistic Universe. And the fractal, mathematical spatial description of it is very limited also. We are going much further, trust me.  But again, you must be the Lion of Nietzsche and eat up your camel humpback, liberate your mind of so much scholarship, and become a child. Quite likely if you are over 20, you won’t.

Because the key to that fractal is that it is moving, alive, even if the mind sees it still. It is ‘young’ and reproductive.

This is indeed what the Universe is all about: a constant creative orgasm of self-similar beings, feeding on energy, gauging information, reproducing into networks of similar beings, evolving socially into larger wholes, dissolving back into cellular/atomic parts in the big-bangs of death… distorting the whole, from a limited perspective, as it has been the human scientific mind for so long. We shall refocus all that information with a more realist vision of a Universe, of which we are all just parts made to the image and likeness of the whole, so you can reach ‘enlightenment’, but only if your distorted ego-view of reality from your enlarged perspective is humble enough to accept the absolute relativity of each point of those scales.

And this is in a way the beauty of a fractal Universe in which each point is a world in itself- a Monad that has a still mirror of reality.  In that regard, the external perception of reality as a fractal, which is as far as most scientists go, is just the very external cover of the Living, Organic, Fractals of the Universe. It is just a 0.% of what we have to explain here: the organic, mental, bio-logical and mathematical properties of the living fractals of nature, all put together harmonised and rationalised, able to describe from human beings to matter states, from societies to galaxies with the same ‘isomorphic’ laws.

As we say humans have a very reduced image of the whole and al its properties, are self-centred in their point of view, which they think specially relevant and so, can only understand very limited number of languages-mirrors (mostly visual mathematics and verbal logic) and so its monads are naturally a very small fraction of all the information of the Universe. And what is worse, the ego paradox limits their interest. In brief, we confuse our infinitesimal mirror of the Universe with the whole Universe:

O (mind-mirror) x  ∞ Universe = ∆-still continuous single space-time mapping of reality (in man light space-time).

It will be difficult for me to take you out of such a reduced picture. To do so we shall first start with an even more reduced picture from where all others come from. The previous equation is indeed the equation of all minds, o-points which observe an infinite Universe, make a reduced mind-mirror or ‘world’ with it, and think they are at the centre of the Universe, because they do NOT know there is much more out there, as they only see their mind-mirror. Can we then at least logically come out of this mind-jail? Yes, we just did it, by generalising the equation. Put any mind-mirror at 0, a dog’s olfactory mind, a black hole’s gravitational mind, and you will get a different linguistic mapping, we can ‘imagine’ is there by the external actions of the dog and black hole, even if we cannot see as they do. Amazingly enough we will find many things about those minds – from the hyperbolic structure of the mind of insects, to the elliptic form of the mind-mirror of a black hole, which according to a physicist called Maldacena, represents in 5 compressed dimensions all the information of the 4-dimensional plane of its galactic body.

The Unification of sciences with 5D planes.

Let us see in a simplified graph those 3 elements, and how they can order all the species of the Universe, in different sciences, each one specialized in the study of a relative ‘plane of space-time size/speed’ of the Universe. Since indeed, the final concept to structure all knowledge is the realization that each science is merely the study of a relative scale of size of the Universe, from quantum physics (smaller scales), through chemistry (molecular scales), biology and history (human scales), geology and astronomy (cosmic scales):

Indeed, each science is just the study of a scale of relative size, Sp, and Frequency of time cycles, Tƒ, of the Universe. So if we put them all in a simple scale of co-invariant systems, whose product of size and time speed is co-invariant, we realise that each science is just the study of the species of an specific scale of size and temporal clocks, and putting them together we obtain, the scalar plane of a 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

Now since each of those scales can be defined as a sum of Species with its specific quanta of space and time frequencies, defined by a co-invariant equation of the 5th dimension, Sp x Tƒ = Ei or in dynamic terms, Sp < = > Tƒ,  a simple equation can resume your being; and as you are just a part of a tapestry of pieces of space-time called beings, that put together create the universe we can write in synoptic form the equation of the fractal Universe of space-time beings:

 U    = ∑ [Œ: ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ] ∆±∞

Whereas each fractal species of space-time, Spe<=>Tiƒ, is in itself a cell or fractal point of a larger super organism, extending across 3 relative scales (the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 social gravitational scales): ∆±1: ∑Spe<≈>∏Tiƒ, which we shall call an existential function, Œ, or fractal point. And so the Universe is merely the sum of all those fractals of space-time across its infinite relative scales: U=∑Œ∆±∞

And yet amazing as it seems NOBODY has formalised these facts, beyond specific ‘species of reality’, mostly in the world of physics, into a theory of the whole tapestry of space-time which is the Universe, and all its parts, made to its image and likeness that makes sense, both logically, mathematically and empirically.

So the true problem is the fact that we must ‘redesign’ the mirror of linguistic, mostly mathematical equations, we use to observe the Universe – a logic, geometric ‘glass’ interposed between the universe of fractal space-time beings, and our mind that we need to ‘reduce’ the whole infinite information about all the beings of space-time of the Universe, to fit it into our mind.

We refocus this mirror of logic truths about time, and geometric truths about space, to acquire a crispier image of reality first.

In that regard the modern view of the fractal paradigm was born when scientists realized the reductionist view that using lineal time and a single arrow of future, entropic motions, implied for the new sciences of biology and cybernetics, systems sciences and information. So at the death of Einstein, which had shown that ‘time curves space into masses’, which are therefore clock-like vortices of time, and that there were ∞ time clocks in the Universe, they met at Macy’s New York and founded the world congress of Systems Sciences (ISSS), with the expressed purpose of improving the physicists single-entropy, lineal time view of the Universe adding the arrow of informative futures, so obvious in all systems of reality, or ‘arrow of life’ (biology) and ‘technology’ (information sciences) and Einstein’s General relativity (energy that becomes mass, in his landmark paper, M=E/c2: ‘can energy create mass’, unfortunately converted in its inverse entropic industry of Nuclear weapons, making mass energy ):

Thus since the 50s a new philosophy of science called General Systems Sciences had as purpose to explain the universe with those arrows of future time, entropy and information, the arrow of ‘death’ and disorder and the arrow of time and order. The main sub disciplines of this science would be:

  • Duality, which is the core philosophy that tries to model all systems of the Universe as systems made of entropic, expansive motions and informative imploding vortices of time-information, and its ‘present’ wave-body combinations. Of which the main dualities were in physical systems between informative gravitational forces and electromagnetic expansive, repulsive ones. Hence unlike physics, with its dogma of an entropic only Universe, the fractal paradigm and Systems sciences does NOT expect to unify gravitation and the other forces, on the contrary it believes its duality of informative=gravitational vs. electromagnetic=entropic forces is a clear proof of the veracity of its philosophy of science and worldview. 
  • Emergence, which tries to explain how parts become wholes through social networks of information, so the Universe displays a 5th dimension of scalar growth, from particles that become atoms, that become molecules that become cells, organisms, social systems of inorganic matter (cosmic bodies) and galaxies. Thus the search was for a ‘metric’ equation that explains how systems interact through its different scales of social evolution in the Universe.
  • Hierarchy, which studies the hierarchical organisation of systems, which can be roughly divided into 3 ‘social classes’, the neuronal, informative class that controls the system with its informative networks (brains in biology, black holes with gravitational systems, informative people-castes in control of the law, and money, the languages of social power, in human cultures – politicos and bankers), the re=productive, working class of the body of a system or society, and the energetic, entropic, territorial field in which the system preys.

So the concepts behind the fractal paradigm were clear from its inception, as they just mimicked the structure of a universe, which we know since Einstein, to have cyclical clocks of time, since Galileo and the discovery of telescopes and microscopes, to have scales of different size, since quantum theory, to be in perpetual motion, as even the smallest quanta of space is NOT a fixed form but a rotary or lineal motion (with angular or lineal momentum), and to have both, social structures and hierarchical classes. How to put all this together and moreover to make a simple formalism based in mathematical and logic concepts able to explain it all simple and nice according to the principles of the scientific method that expect theories to be simple, economical and include all previous theories as its limit, was the goal of those congresses and sciences, and for 50 years it was not possible to find such formalism.

Then with the arrival of fractal mathematics, slowly researchers realized that all systems could be mathematically explained with fractal equations, in which similar forms evolved into social networks that became wholes. So the mathematical analysis was possible. It was still though needed the conceptual, logic model regarding the multiple time clocks of the Universe, its order, and the metric equations of the 5th dimension that allowed ‘travels’ through those scales of parts and wholes, and of course, the cornerstone of the whole building – duality, how to put together the 2 arrows of relative time, future information and entropic disorder for each fractal part of reality where we observe ‘locally’ those 2 arrows at work in different moments.

To that aim the key change of paradigm was to realise that Newtonian absolute space-time was false – something quantum and relativity theorists acknowledge a century ago, and Leibniz’s concept of relational time, of a universe made of beings that are vital spaces with different time clocks, self-centred into an informative frame of reference or point of view – hence a Universe of infinite worlds of space-time, was right.

We are all beings made of vital space with entropic motions, harnessed by cyclical clocks of time which carry the information of the Universe in its frequency and form. So we need to explode the Universe and rebuild it from its beginning as Einstein wished to do when he affirmed ‘I seem to be the only physicist who knows there are infinite time clocks in the Universe. Leibniz was right, but if so we have to rebuild the foundations of sciences from its first principles’, which are its time clocks, its vital spaces, and the 5th dimension that orders them.

So at the 50th anniversary of ISSS, when i was made the international chair of this science, Duality, I introduced the only standing formalism of Leibniz’s relational space-time that puts together all those sub disciplines of General Systems Sciences.

To that aim I added to the arrows of entropy and information the concept of a 3rd arrow of time, which combines the relative future, dominant arrow of information and the relative past, entropic arrow into wave-body like systems, giving birth to a Fractal Generator equation for all those space-time systems:

Spe (limbs/fields of entropy) <ST (body-waves that iterate information ) >Tiƒ (heads-particles of information).

Now a fractal generator is the logic equation that through iterations and variations create all the scales of a fractal system. It is very simple, as in Mandelbrot’s fractal, z+c2, but precisely through its constant dynamic feed-back and forth iteration, creates all the complex beings of reality. So does the Universe by mixing lineal entropic motions and cyclical forms, into infinite combinations, of limbs-bodies-heads and fields-waves-particles.

So that simple generator, is the essential logic formalism used in this web to describe all fractal beings of the Universe.

And the 5th dimension, of scalar parts and wholes and its metric equation: Spe x Tiƒ= Constant body-wave, is the metric that orders all those systems.

Both together construct the fractal Universe of ∞ self-centered space-time beings made to its image and likeness.

To study them, as 5 Dimensional space-time beings, we divide the analysis of that fractal generator, and all its species, into 10 sets of isomorphic laws, related to each of those 3 elements 5 Dimensional metrics, fractal space and cyclical time, put together in each system by a 0-point of view, or mental linguistic mapping, which uses different monad-like mirrors and languages to guide the survival of the system in the outside Universe – mathematical geometry, in physical systems, genetic languages in biological systems, memetic languages in human societies and so on.

THE 11 SETS OF LAWS of the ISOMORPHIC METHOD.

The method of ∆@S≈T IS SIMPLE repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with 5Dimensional elements, ordered in dualities of space-form/time-motion constantly ‘moving’, that is switching on and off between states: Space/Time/Space/Time and then in ternary games of 3 dimensions of ∆±i scales, three topological forms of space, which form super organisms and live through 3 frequency scales of 5 actions, three ages/dimensions of time coming into a world cycle, as topology follows its r=evolutions in form, all supervised by the will of survival of a mind.

Thus we talk of 5 elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºs≈t-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 3×4 = 12 isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.

The 11 ∆ST Isomorphic elements of all Fractal ∏ime§pace beings:

•:  -1, 0,   Linguistic O-Minds   ∆•Γ: Generate…  

s=t  Bidimensional Space-Time fields of Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions integrated into… Å ≈∑B

S: 3. 4. Ternary, Constant Networks and species…   N = ∑

T:   7. 8  that live 3±∆ ages as Species moving… Ω; w

∆…  9. 10. 1  through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ  

What this means is astoundingly simple.

º: All what exists are ternary systems ruled by a mind-singularity that orders in space three elements expressed in the generator equation of the being: Spe (Limbs/Fields) < St (body-waves) >Tiƒ (heads-particles, often the site of the mind), and performs actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with fractal points of different scales of the fifth dimension, moving (Aa), feeding (Ae), perceiving and communicating (Aï) in order to reproduce (Aœ) and evolve socially (Au) into a larger whole, as that is the best strategy for the being to survival. 

So we study four times the same reality from four different perspectives, that of the active mind and its will of survival just expressed…

The isomorphisms of the mind are then clear:

  • ∆ºS; The isomorphism of its spatial location, mostly on the center of maximal communication, in inward, energetic systems, or in the upper dimension of informative height in informative systems, or in the foreword position in entropic systems (the ternary principle IS the fundamental law of causality, and creation of the Universe studied in depth in the posts on species and ¬Æ grammar.
  • The isomorphism of temporal information, the language which shrinks to become the mind, AND we shall number as i for multiple reasons: it is the isomorphism of pure information, it is the symbol of the ‘imaginary number’, which we shall see is essential to the mathematical language as a number, to the verbal language as ‘imagination’, and so on. And ultimately because the language is the inverse function of the extension of entropy and space, a priori condition of creation of the mind; a dense knot of linguistic forms. And obviously because 0 must be the symbol of the mind, and the language comes ‘before it’.

S: then the ternary structure in space of the being as it growth from bidimensional actions, into ternary constant networks of entropy, energy and information, which allow the system to appear as a super organism in space  S(2,3,4 isomorphisms).

T: Which give in turn birth to the three ages of time of the being, and its different ‘species’, which live a world cycle defined as a trip back and forth through scales of the fifth dimension, as the being is generated in an ∆-1 seminal scale, surfaces in the ∆0 individual scale, where it lives three ages to die back into the ∆-1 scale.

∆… Which therefore allow us to have a final view of the entity in existence through its evolution across social planes of the fifth dimension each one made of 10 sub-scales of social growth, if we study each ∆-fractal plane in its internal structure, or 10 scales of the whole observed by man, which we call in a mystical sense, ‘God: Γº∆’.

-1≈11: Closing the isomorphisms: we can perceive God as the language in as much as the language-scale comes from the whole down to all its forms, imprinting them. So the -1 and 11 ‘scales’ outside the being itself, do enclose the being. 

How the language, the software, the ‘saint spirit’ in the mystical tradition, infuses the seminal seed of its ∆-1 scale to ‘create a living being’ has to do with the ‘postulate of existence’ which requires at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist.

So the mind in its origin, made to the fractal image and likeness of the whole, God, as we are all Gods, all super organisms, all dust of space-time, is the alpha and omega of creation.

And the method to study each being as part of that unity, even if its details vary, is the essence of the isomorphic method.

From the perspective of the mind, we state, the goal of the system is to preserve its ternary STRUCTURE, within balance with the external ST world, which we express in the function of existence, e x i = st, in its ‘simultaneous, verbal-mathematical expression’; useful for philosophical discourse, but better expressed in the Generator.

Ø1. The two first isomorphisms to describe the being are its Mind, Tiƒ, and its generator function: ∆º Γ:

We observe a being, its ternary parts, body/wave, field/limbs and particle/heads, and focus on the dominant Ƽ particle-head.

We could then departing from the pole of information express how the being will act in the external world to absorb and emit entropy and information, or its combined energy to maintain its balance with the external world. Yet if Tiƒ is a seed of information, and the being is not yet formed, we can do an alternative ‘developmental’ description or palingenesis of the being, a fascinating subject so far only studied with certain depth in biology according to which the being will start to reproduce its information in clone forms, and grow through its actions of feeding, reproducing and evolving socially emerge into a new being.

And this is the particular ‘arrangement’ of the third line in a convenient order to study all the processes of the being, as it goes through its world cycle.

5. Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions integrated into… ∫Å ≈ ∆±1

So the mind-being will first start to ‘act’ in a sequential order of perception of information, motion if required towards a field of energy (provided on spot usually by a mother through its genesis), absorption of entropy, reformed into energy by impritng of its form, reproducing the system. So next to the Mind-Generator, we study its existential actions, with a simple mandate: ‘Grow and multiply’

2.3 Bidimensional fields of Constant Ternary Space-Time Networks… B ≈N; K

But once growth of parallel clones is achieved, in herds roaming on its St+1 ecosystem, density of form requires efficiency in the handle of entropic motions and energetic ‘substance’, so by trial and error in earlier evolution, by mind’s compression of the events of time, without the errors, which is the main function of the mind – efficiency as it must shrink the whole of the cycles of ‘being’ into those who are ‘meaningful in its perfect form’…

7.  that live 3±∆ ages… Ω;

6. 8 moving Species… ∑, Ψ,

And so in this manner, all systems that grow and multiply end becoming supœrganisms, invaginated by three networks, which attach the cells/atoms/citizens to its flows of entropy, form and energy, making them dependent on the networks, which will become themselves, the three parts of an Γ+1 generator in a new scale of growth.

9. 10 through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ

Is there a limit to that growth? If time has been eternal, it follows reproduction has been infinite and so are the scales of beings.

Which brings us to the question of, the mind of all minds, the mind…

11. of God… Γºœ∆, which as the reader observes is written as the mind ‘backwards’ or rather the infinitesimal mind is a reduction backwards of the ∞ mind of god; with the added body, œ, of the suprorganism, as that is the game the mind imprints in reality. So God is the mind of the perfect supœrganism, and its laws – the Universe, which was indeed the definition Plato made of it.

God though is NOT an isomorphism of any species, but the absolute whole of which all beings are mirrors, within its mind-organism structure. So it would be silly to consider it for the different species. We are part of god the whole, god is not part of us, the mind just its reflection. So from languages to scales we shall defined for each species its 12 isomorphisms.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of a mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

No more can be said as a Human mind of it all. Indeed, initially i did put Γºœ∆ as the last post of the web, also with its isomorphisms, but then I realise such act of astounding arrogance from my ø-humind (ab. human mind) was the biggest sin humans have once and again commited. So I keep what people normally call religion, as the interpretations of the mind of God by humans, in the section of History mostly, divided between anthropomorphic religions of god, which study the subconscious collective of human societies, evolved by the power of social love, and eastern, objective religions which study as this blog does the taoist/hindi game of  yin-formation-visnu & Shiva-entropy-yang:

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

The program of existence.

Since all what all the systems of the Universe do is to try to survive by maintaining its limbs/fields of entropy, bodies-waves of energy and heads-particles of information, with ‘plenty’ of the stuff they are made. So all what all systems do and its super organisms code are the so called five drives of life, motion ( a-ccelerations), energy-feeding (e), informing (perceiving and communicating: ï), reproducing similar offspring (œ) and finally evolving socially with similar beings into stronger wholes or ‘Universals’ of a larger social ∆+1 scales (u).

So we talk of a mnemonic a,e,i,o,u system of ‘actions of space-time’, which every system of Nature performs in discontinuous, modular sequential series between birth and extinction, as the PROGRAM OF SURVIVAL OF THE UNIVERSE and all it system, encoded for each species with different informative linguistic parameters (i.e. an electron codes with four quantum numbers those actions, so the first number encodes its motion and energy feeding, the second number its informative processing, the third spin number its seminal reproduction, the fourth magnetic number its social evolution; a cell codes the five actions with its four letters, the human being, with its verbal thoughts, a company-mother of machines with its equations of re=productivity and so on).

We shall then show that we can build the architectonical Universe not only in space as a sum of ‘∆-1: fractal points’ that become physiological networks that become wholes of an external world in three scales of complexity, but also in time, as a ternary scaling process of individual actions, which become arrows of time, which become world cycles of existence…

As the sum of those actions, invariably increase the information of the system, dominated by its informative particle-heads, given the fact that its sequential order: +∆i: perceiving, -∆e: moving, +∆e: feeding, +∆i->œ: reproducing, +∆i:communicating to form organic synchronised wholes, invariably increases the ‘in-form-ation’ of the system (maximal number of +∆i events) and decreases its energy, ultimately explaining why all systems follow a worldcycle of increasing information, till all energy and entropy is exhausted, and as TIME NEVER STOPs, the system must reverse its arrows and suffer a sudden explosion of entropy and erasing of information, i<<e, in the moment of death, which the Universe limits to a single time quanta, in its enormous wisdom to maintain the total amount of entropy and form of reality in a zero-sum of ‘conserved present energy’, to make it immortal.  the minimalist ‘timing of death’, always happening in the minimal ‘quantum of time’ of any species.

The big-bang of a galaxy (and perhaps a local Universe)  takes 10 ˆ-43 seconds, a planck’s time quantum. Our personal death takes a second, the ‘beating time quanta’ of our ‘eyes glimpses, heart-beat, step-walking – each species having its ternary parts synchronised to its time quanta: And so we all die for the Universe to be eternal.

The ∆§T Disomorphic elements of all Fractal ∏ime§pace beings:

The understanding of those elements together, the scales, ∆, of space (S) and time (t), of a system, focused as a whole by the existence of an infinitesimal singularity or mirror- mind (ab. •,º) of information (which we can only infer by comparison with the human mind and its survival actions), will define the fundamental particle of the Universe, a super organism of space-time, which we call ‘∆ºûst of space-time’, in as much as it is an island-universe in itself, (û), extending through ∆-scales of space-time, and organised by a relative ∆º-mind  and its linguistic mind mirrors able to control and order the Universe around them.

In that regard, the isomorphic method comes immediately from the two FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF GST: the four elements of all whole systems (mind, scales, space and time) and the ternary principle, which allows to study in detail any system along those four ‘elements’ by decomposing it into ternary elements (up, down and central scales, three ages, three topologies; and the mind focus on the other three elements, as a temporal self, which orders a ternary super organism, defined by a ‘generator equation’ through its scalar actions.

So first we consider the mind as the temporal vector of the being, moving across all other dimensions of existence:

º-mind:   0.1 5.   Ø-Minds   Generate… Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions… 

The perspective of the mind is selfish, trying to order and mirror its internal view, within the body, which in an Aristotelian sense is the energy moved by the ‘unmoved’ God-center of its whole. Yet as each mind-pov orders reality ‘LINGUISTICALLY’, the sum of all those povs which collaborate together.

So we define three isomorphisms of the Mind, symmetric to the three ‘other elements’ of any system:

  • 0. Its location in space (0-isomorphism), normally in the center or above of the system, at the points of maximal communication, a clear proof of its perceptive nature.
  • G. Its Universal Grammar, or language of processing information, escaping the subjective human anthropomorphic beliefs about non-sentient or sentient species – fact is  A LANGUAGE IS PERFECTLY ABLE TO MANAGE INFORMATION AND ORDER REALITY as the mathematical language of machines and nature, the olfactory language of animals or the genetic language of cells show. Thus we simply affirm languages are the mirrors of minds that order reality through:
  • Å. Actions, which are exchanges of entropy, energy an information with the environment.

In this manner a space-time being will emerge as a network of entropic, energetic and informative actions organising a ternary supœrganism. It is this collective intelligence of selfish povs, which as time passes coordinate, synchronise and simultaneously act as a whole, the ultimate intelligence of the Universe that gives birth to a spatial supœrganism:

S:  2. 3. 4.  integrated into…Bidimensional Space-Time fields of Ternary, Constant Networks… B;  K; Γ

We can then define any system as a part or whole system of ternary networks, in which fractal points will emerge to form a full functional system. In detail the process starts with exchanges of entropy and information between ‘two points-minds’ that give birth to a bidimensional field, seen as a flow of entropy or information dynamic terms, as a ‘wave of extended space’ in static terms.

As more points attach to the network, however this ‘field’ limited by the points which become its border, acquire their own inner dynamics, becoming the protagonist of the next phase of creation of reality; when the system evolves from a herd state, in which points have maximal motion, and the interaction between them is discontinuous, often along a single network line (mostly entropic actions of feeding together), into a superorganic, tighter configuration.

IT HAPPENS as reproduction increases the size of the herd and efficiency is required to feed the system.

And so again we define three isomorphisms, for the spatial organisation of the being, which can be resumed in its generator:

  • A BIDIMENSIONAL isomorphism that analyses the relationships between the limits of the domain, its past entropy and future information parameters
  • The generator proper that studies the three networks which create the system together
  • And the constants and ratios that define dynamically those systems, through its entropic speed (S/t), informative density (t/s), existential momentum (S x t) and scalar structure (∆§).

So a new collective singularity, able to manage hierarchically faster flows of information that diminish friction between the individual points of the herd arises and a larger whole is formed…

T:  6. 7. 8  that will move 3±∆ ages as a Species… Ω : Ψ; ∑  The system then will be born, as an individual super organism or a new species in an efficient predatory lineal form,  in a young entropic age of growth, dominated by the entropic, digestive, feeding arrow/network, able to maximise the hunting capacity and starting a ‘reproductive radiation’ that increases its territory of order, during its mature age as a super organism, seen either as an individual (middle point of view) or a species (point of view of the ∆-1 cell). In that case we realise that species can also be described as variations of the same theme into 6 different phyla according to the dominance of the S, st, or Tiƒ system (S>st>t, S>t>st, St>t>st, St>s>t, t>st>s, t>s>st), to which we ad the fundamental duality of the Universe or variation of gender, between the ‘female-wave’ state of balance, S=t, and the ‘male field-particle’ state of dynamic imbalance (S>t<s). And so we can describe that growth before once more the reproduction saturates the system, exhausting its energy and plunging the being into its informative third age and entropic death, which restores the balance, from the perspective of its scalar dimension, as a process of social growth…

∆…  9. 10. 11   through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ  of God… Γº∆ 

So finally the three ultimate isomorphisms describe reality from the perspective of the fifth dimension as a constant growth of systems through social scales of decametric tetraktys 3 x 3 +0, physiological entropy moving limbs/fields, energetic bodwaves and informative particle/heads – networks of points, which grow with a minimum of three ternary elements, till creating a o-mind of maximal communication between them, which emerges as a whole for a larger social scalar growth till forming a ‘plane’ of 10¹° elements. The difference between social scales and planes being a larger discontinuity of form, from microscopic to macroscopic order… So we study all those social scales, till the limits of human perception, the atom and the galaxy, likely to be just new levels of an infinite ¹° 10 immortal infinite Universe – a block of time that has always existed, will always exist and will keep repeating the same forms.

Those constants of form, and its diversifications, compare to the reproductive, clone repetitions bring further philosophical questions, since if the number of variations of information is smaller than the number of reproductions in space, all forms will be repeated in a discontinuous manner, and we are all immortal as the Universe is, co-existing as clone identical populations, obeying a bose-statistics scheme, in which equal forms communicate regardless of space-distance as bosons by non-local entanglement, but such themes of complex GST are well beyond the scope of this post. So we shall  end our description of the 11+0 isomorphisms of reality at this stage. 

The blog content.

So we can and will slowly build this blog to show how all systems of the Universe are ‘made of dust of space-time’, and all its ‘isomorphic=equal’ properties can be derived from that ‘ultimate substance’, which as Leibniz put it, we can call ‘God’.

In this first (and second) lines, we shall study the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view, in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST:

  • The experimental, scientific method, providing proofs of the cyclical, fractal ðime-§pace structure of all Universal beings.
  • The correspondence principle, translating basic theories of classic science to ‘stience’.
  • Which we shall fusion together into the GST-proper ‘stientific method’, the isomorphic method that shows any law of known-known science can be put in correspondence with the isomorphic properties of space-time beings, translated and applied to physical, biological an social systems equally. The isomorphic method though will be used in the third and fourth line. So the first two lines are meant to be a ‘transitional stage’ between ‘classic science’ and ‘future stience’.

So we structure the posts of those two first lines with a simple scheme. At epistemological level (1) in the first line, we describe the topological (S), organic (∆), vital (T) and sentient (º) properties of beings, derived of its ∆ºST common nature.

In the second line (2) at experimental level we show the main ‘stiences’ of reality and its main species to obey those laws, which suffice to derive all properties of physical, biological, social and mental systems.

1) Epistemological Proofs, which ‘Correspond’ with classic theories and its experimental facts allowing for all the scales and entities of reality the description of its events and forms through:

  • Its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties derived of its ternary topological=spatial elements and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles.
  • Its biological properties, derived of the 5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure of all systems.
  • Its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of exi=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals.

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final ¬-Æncyclopedia of GST systems:

2.1) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the properties of:

2.2) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 and…

2.3) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

2.4) Mental, linguistic systems (mathematical, visual≈artistic, genetic, verbal, etc.), whose description under the ∆ºst properties of all beings will close the second line.

Needless to say the ‘hidden symmetries and correspondences’ of the parts of the Universe, as seen by human beings are many. For example, humans ‘like’ to apply only spatial=mathematical properties to physical systems, vital, temporal ages only to biological systems, social and mental qualities only to human beings, yet we shall show the ∆ºst quality of all beings to be the same, regardless on how huminds, which want to come on top as the self-centred only intelligent, social loving species describe them.

But of course we believe our mirror-minds are the ‘origin’ NOT just a reflected ‘crystal-like’ organ. So for example, we think our ‘mind’ creates mathematics (platonic idealism), which then is the ‘only’ language of reality (physical naive reductionism). Not so, there are infinite languages of information (Upanishad), and all of them are mirrors with ternary fractal structures that reflect the larger ∆ûst  or primary substance from where the imitative languages depart.

Let us see how with a brief analysis of one of those mind-mirrors, the mathematical language, as an experimental stience-mirror, as it is customary for ‘science’ to think in platonic terms, since Galileo that only maths and maths ‘imagined by humans’ (Hilbert’s axiomatic method: ‘i imagine lines, points and planes), are a ‘real language’ of description of the Universe. So we shall conclude this introduction showing that maths are a mirror of ∆ºûst properties. Above we show indeed that maths are self-centred mirrors in its frames of reference that reflect the Universe, because the Universe is born of the interaction of those mind-mirrors and the ordered territories they control.

Relative time travels.

All this said, even if we shall consider this section as a process which departs from the mind; the mind is the perspective of man, an informative being, whose arrow of time is self-centred in its Tiƒ element. But the story is a bit more complex.

This program of creation, as we said can be seen as an external process, hence departing from the ‘external field of space-time in which the being exists’. And this which is the approach of physicists becomes an objective description or internal through the will of the being. Both are however tied by the complementarity between both; which means that the mind alone needs to understand the differences with the limb/field to become a complementary field-body-wave/head particle to be=come.

And so the philosophical question about the program of creation is this:

From the perspective of the mind, the mind causes reality, but from the perspective of the field, the field is its origin; and so we must readdress our idea of time arrows to include both perspectives. And fine tune the previous concept of the mind willing to survival as the time arrow we humans, mental beings see as the future: Tif>>Spe (human arrow). Yet from the point of view of the field; the singularity emerges from it and we shall then consider that if we were a field, we would see the singularity as our ‘creation’: Spe>>Tiƒ; and consider that process the arrow of future. 
And so the proper way to consider causality is to affirm that the relative S>t and T>s arrows form a feed back equation, S<≈>T of present, which becomes the defining process of symbiosis and complementarity of existence. This gives us three temporal descriptions which we observe in many sciences. I.e. in quantum physics there is mathematical description in which the field gives birth to the particle (quantum field theories) another in which there are multiple present paths between them (Feynman) and another in which the singularity creates the field (classic description of electrodynamic).

Yet for that reality to make sense, it implies  we need to adopt a single perspective, as the human mind is NOT multidimensional; and that is the approach we have taken after decades of working for my self playing with the three approaches simultaneously. How this works is simple, by accepting that fields are past and so it is possible a local travel to the pst, when we observe, Spe>>tiƒ, from the causal origin in tiƒ: Tiƒ<<Spe. So we affirm that a system Tiƒ can travel to its past, when it devolves into a field. 

And distinguish in this process of entropic devolution of a being into its ∆-1 ‘limbs/field scale’, two degrees of entropic motion, locomotion tiƒ<Spe, and entropic death – a fast dissolution of form and expansion in space, Tiƒ<<Spe.

In the graph sample we see how those local time loops play in a field around the black hole, where in the equations we see how time signs change in complex and various ways, depending on the models of equations we use, as physicists ignore the ¬Æ logic of ternary time. So weird interpretations like the one of the graph (Hawking’s black hole evaporation to the past, never found experimentally seem possible; as he affirms a man could fall into a black hole and come out in the past and kill the father). Not so as relative future to past motions are logic motions which affect only the time-space arrows of the ‘ternary system; singularity-body-field, through its world cycle of life and death. It is precisely the exploration of those three timespace arrows the content of ¬Ælgebra, which gives origin to a 3 x 3+ 0 10 dimensional description of the supœrganisms of the Universe.

Mind mirror interaction with the Universe, reflected in blog. Ego paradox bias stientific properties.

Reality in that sense is CONSTRUCTED BOTH WAYS, FROM the objective ∞ Universal space-time into the ø-mind mirror, which will use its ternary syntactic languages to perceive and then it will reflect the mind’s language, point of view and will of survival, through its actions of subjective order of reality to make it look like its mind mirror. 

And from that dual back and forth relationship both the Universe and the mind-mirror evolve into more perfect apperceived realities

So we shall also reflect that duality in the blog’s division of 3 lines, explaining both sides of the process:

The first line studies from an external, OBJECTIVE point of view the process of creation of the Universe, as an observer would observe the different creation of supœrganisms co-existing in several scales of the fifth dimension, performing its world cycles of existence, each species belonging to a different ternary scale, which humans study in four basic groups of sciences:

  • Astrophysical sciences, focused in the most remote scales, described external spatial, objective motions, but unfortunately rejecting all other properties under the paradox of the mind-ego.
  • Biological sciences, focused in the species of life, similar to humans, closer to us, and hence given according to the paradox of the ego (only closer systems to us are given its full properties) life-biological properties, but denied linguistic mental perceptive properties till very recently.
  • Linguistic sciences, which study the languages of the mind, focused in human languages, verbal, temporal, visual, artistic and spatial, mathematical languages, whose sentient properties as LANGUAGES PERCEIVE IN THEMSELVES, are denied again to all other mind-mirrors and languages, considering only intelligent and ‘free’, those actions performed by human languages. (At best animals have instincts, the rest of reality nothing).
  • But and this will be the biggest surprise of GST, when considering human social sciences, humans are ALSO DENIED SOCIAL organic properties beyond the individual at the social level, which however are considered and practiced with machines by its company-mothers? Why?
  • This will lead us to a novel analysis of company-mothers of machines, placebo democracies and how the evolution of Gaia is terraforming the earth into a planet of metal-machines, which contrary to belief have through its company-mothers with its private issue of stock-money and unlimited money, anonymous societies laws, absolute rights as the free citizens of the econ(nomic)system. So for that reason we do NOT evolve into a global human super organism but a global market; as humans have become ‘enzymen’ ‘animetals’, catalysers of the evolution of memes of metal, money, weapons and machines, aborting its own social evolution.

Yet in the two final lines consider an internal point of view, as mind-monads of linguistic mapping generate reality in its reflection of its mind-mirror or ‘seed of information’ (∆-1  tƒi), imprinting the Universe in the process, generating through its actions of motion, reproduction, information and social evolution a super organism, which will have a constant form as a simultaneous mess of three physiological networks, S, st, t in space, but moved by the mind will age, as it travels its cycle of existence through the social scales and planes of ‘God – mystical view of the mind of the Universe’ made to its image and likeness, in its finite life and detach world cycle. 

The mandate though for each being is simple: ‘grow and multiply, maximise your existence, move ad maximal with your entropic limbs, reproduce your body-waves, perceive the beauty of its forms with your mind-head-particle’. So even before we define in this post the game for all species and develop its future paths in other ones, we can simply write the equation for each ‘being’, ∆ºst, gauging the entropy and information of the game:

Maximize your existence as a fractal space-time being.

ðime§paœ ∆ûst r=evolves accelerating towards ¡ts future, ∆º-singularity mind, which will stiff its motions into the entropy of death.

At that moment perception occurs, in the synchronous mind mapping of the linguistic intelligence of the monad, infinitesimal mirror of the universe. But at that moment time becomes 0 space with no motion, and it is that pure present moment which stops the future exploding to compensate the stillness of form into an entropy wave of disorder, back to the past for the worldcycle to complete. It is the singularity mind who orders and kills at the same synchronous still present spaœ. This moment of death, of zero time, which precedes the ejection from the singularity at ∞ space; is perhaps the meaning of all existences, to stop motion the substance of the Universe; to see it all broken immediately in the entropic explosion that follows.

Humans think they understand the Universe, and that is fine – they do understand it to the limits of what they need to know to perform their roles on it. Moreover they always thought so. And each time they thought their ‘method of knowledge’, and ‘language’, myths reasons, words, numbers were the only proper way to describe it. First the used the word God, then the word science, first verbs to describe time then numbers and clocks.

And yet information is inflationary and keeps growing, so we will always expand this knowledge with new r=evolutions on the understanding of its man in concepts, time, space, mind, causality and scales.

We wrote a synoptic ‘concept-equation’ to summon all those realities, ∆º±ST:  we are all made of ∞ dust of space-time.

We have now explained its two fundamental elements, the ternary arrows of space-time; S, T, s=t, and the fractal scales of the fifth dimension, ∆±i.

This should suffice for an external description of reality, but NOT to explain the persistence and order of all wholes, and the meaning of science, as the whole supœrganism (ab. œ, changing slightly as usual in GST, the wording of super-organism) MUST have a point or centre of order that ensures its survival. This is the function of the mind that transits between ‘∆±1 scales’, as a pure temporal singularity, in contact with the inner ∆-i world of the body-limbs, but also with the ∆+i outer world in which it performs the actions of the survival program of exchange of energy and information that all systems ‘in existence’ follow.

Further on, in as much as science is a mental endeavour of perception of the Universe with the mirror-languages of time and space of the mind (logic and geometry), without understanding the mind-mirror and its interaction with reality there is no way we can make sense of a philosophy of science.

FIRST LINE

5d ∏ime§paœ ¬Æ points maximise their exi:s≈tienœ reproducing supœrganisms tripping ∆º world cycles…  is the first ‘funny’ sentence of the blog, which encodes of many similar ones, the meaning of it all. Reality is made of motions with form, past spatial entropy x future, temporal form, Spe x Tƒi, of cyclical times, πimes and fractal, organic spaces, spaœ ‘dust’, island-universes, which are dust from a higher perspective, ‘∆ust’, made of scalar space-time ‘arrows’/motions with form.

Yet all dust ‘exist’ and by the mere fact of existing it will have a singularity,a temporal mind, tº∆º, which will come in contact with a field of entropy, S, and extract a wave , s ≈ tº of energy and information, ex i.

To exist is to be a singularity mind with a perception, a mirror and a desire to order according to the mirror the Universe around the mind monad. And to that aim it will maximise its body-wave, e xi, exchanging entropy and form, from an Spatial field, in which it host, by approaching in parallel and absorbing in perpendicular, its motion with form. To maximise existence we can use a simple equation:

Max. exi|s=t, that is all systems try to maximise its present momentum by finding a balance between its body and information e=i.

1.1 Max. e=i

will in that sense be the simplest expression of the ‘existential function’; as it is a given that e and i will enter in relationship and communion of compemetnarity and maximise their reproduction and excommunication when both have the same value:

1.2  e+i=K-> Max.  e x i (e=i)

So there are three arrows of time. 2 which we can consider pure changes towards two poles of the being: pure form, which we relate closely to the still linguistic mappings of minds. Tƒi. And its opposite. Pure distance-space, simultaneous non-local, non-perceivable, Spe. Those two poles akin to the yin and yang pure limits of taoism; would represent in physics, pure, invisible gravitational space-vacuum and informative ultra-dense black holes. In biology the seminal seed of information that starts the life-death cycle and its explosion and dissolution in death. In topology, the singularity and membrane of a ‘ball’.

IT IS THE COMBINATION OF BOTH though in bidimensional present ‘momenta’, mixing both entropy and form, e x ƒ, what truly moves and changes the world, as pure seeds of information and invisible actions at distance are not perceivable.

So we talk loosely of PRESENT as the product of e x i :  s=t, that is as the mix of both limiting singularities and membranes (in a topological view) or mix past and future in a present (in a temporal view) , or ∆±1 scales of loose herds of entropic parts and tight knots of mind-perception, in a coordinated ∆º body-wave.

This ST, present, e x i ∆º body wave thus has both energy (form with dominant motion) & in-form-ation, form-in-action (form with minimal motion).

And so we consider Spatial Past-entropy x Time Future-information: Spe x Tƒi = ST=exi:   present momentum, mixture of ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’. This is the conventional verbal use of the terms ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’ that we preserve here.

And we call by convention, the relative ‘past’ of the Universe, the non-informative, pure vacuum and ‘future’ the, maximal informative state, even if both come back and forth in world cycles.

However as energy has been so much studied in mathematical terms, we have also to explore the somewhat slightly different more restrictive term of mathematical energy, as the integral of present momenta, which therefore will measure all the present momenta from birth to extinction of the being.

Thus humans measure those world cycles and its symmetric Organic simultaneous systems, with Energy used as the main parameter of physics to calculate physical world cycles which if computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. As all world cycles between birth and extinction are indeed conservative zero sums.

The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldcyle, etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.

As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.

Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The three arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) becomes  masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Now, let us introduce the terminology of , ‘stience’, and its GST≈∆ΦΓ ƒormalism considering the use of greek or double letters to slightly change the meaning in latin and make possible to introduce complexity with self-similar yet not equal concepts as those of normal ‘science’.

Cyclical time for example makes use of the similar letter π, ∏, which symbolises the cycle,and also the multiplicative form, which symbolises the network structure of informative bits: ∏imps.

§paœ on the other hand is fractal, co-exiting in several social, œrganic scales, forming the super organisms, ab.œ, of space-time, whih is all what exists, made of a relative ∞ number of infinitesimal ∆-1 particles of a lower plane, dust of space-time that evolves into island-universes, worlds, supœrganisms, made of three physiological arrows formalised with the laws of non-aristotelian, non-euclidean time: ¬Ærrows.

Hence the title of the post, a Universe made of: 5D ∏ime§paœ ∆ûst oƒ 3 ¬Ærrows

We shall use three terms and slightly different versions of the generator equation according to which of the three symmetries of the Universe we study:

Γ: For the wholeness of a world cycle generator equation that describes the three elements of beings in increasing detail:

∆-1: å for the actions of space-time, Ωº for its time Ωges, and W∑e+1, for its whole energy, its world cycles.

So those are the symbols for the generator equation of time arrows, its actions, ages and world cycles most used, which we combine often into other games of ‘words’ and phonemes, reconstructing self-similar words in different languages, as in the word Gœd=∆ºΓ

Φ & œ are the symbols for the | xO=Φ organic topologies parallel to those ages.

∆º±1 ±i, the scales of the being, which will normally be three. And so we can do ceteris parbius analysis stretching one of the parts of, ‘ΓΦ∆, GŒD’ in greek and latin letters. We are aware of the meaning of the word God, taken in GST as the mind of the Universe, more specifically the ‘game of existence’, or ‘function of existence’ that makes reality be a constant creation and destruction of world cycles of super organisms.

The use of different symbols stresses the fact that the Universe is a fractal that gather both in space and time smaller elements into wholes in three ranges. For example, time arrows combine first in ‘actions’ (å) of energy and time, the minimal unit of physical systems, expanded to all systems. They gather in ‘ages’,  (Ω) in which a type of arrow dominate. And those ages become finally world cycles (∑, w), which is the ternary wholeness beyond which a new game starts. In space we also find three topologies that become a ‘whole super organism’ (ab. Œ); and finally in scales, while we can observe multiple planes along the decametric logarithm scale, we shall find most systems do operate in three scales above and below the ∆º organic scale of the individual, where a ‘mind-informative center’ projects through actions of exchange of energy and information order over its territorial ternary system.

The absolute relativity of those atomic/cellular parts that become whole organic systems, diminutive actions that become whole world cycles of existence, is main explicit in our ‘third line analysis’ of the isomorphic nature and growth in time and space of those super organisms: the being will start as a mind pov, generating with actions of space-time a series of exchanges of energy and information with the world, starting a process of growth and organisation through three ages, and different variations of species, till becoming a whole ‘being’ an island-Universe in itself, extending through 10 scales of social growth and planes of reality. So all beings are from that perspective of full growth a God-mind, an island-Universe, but from a larger scale of existence, a mere particle-point or mind observing the infinite.

The absolute relative Universe of finite time, extension and scales for each º∆º mind ordering it.

So we can call God, the mind of the Generator, infinite, scalar Universe  of decametric planes, and all its decametric parts, with an ∆º mind the 10th dimension ruling them. And thus alas! despite so much critical thought on Absolute space-time and Newton’s religious musings, we do accept Space as the body of God, what we call Plenum, but also Plato understood:

‘REALITY is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’ Timeus, Plato.

It is important to understand the spirituality of an informative, organic universe, where the particle is not a substance as all is motion (albeit seen in simultaneity as a space form), and all is intelligent, meaning it has a cause, consequence, form and function.

But ALL IS RELATIVE, as there is no  preferred motion (relativity proper), form (all being variations of the three topological only species of reality), age and evolution (as all evolutions are part of a larger world cycle which will end into death and extinction) and scale. It is precisely this final relativity of scale, which makes indispensable to understand the game in subjective terms, as any ‘point of view’ which controls a system and organises it will have a subjective limited range of perception both in time (its life duration) space (its territory of inner order, membrane of communication and outer world) and scales (beyond which uncertainty, darkness and indistinguishability will make the borders of its perception, the limits of being)

Only then considering that the quantities that matter are constant ratios maintained across scales, that reality is designed for the observer, and limited by it, we can figure out truly the Universe as an absolute relative fractal where mind-points act as mirrors of order, creating around them territorial organisms with a limit of existence in time, of duration, of extension and of co-existing scales.

All this said we can now deal with mathematics as an excellent mirror image of that primary reality. And expand our foundations of logic and mathematics to introduce the simplest equations of GST and elements of any mind describing its relative ternary world: island-universe.

The fractal Generator.

We shall start by analysing the basic ‘formalism’ of Duality, the ‘fractal generator equation’ of the ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time beings that describes all the systems of entropy and information of the Universe, joined by its body-fields of energy:

Γ.  Fractal Generator Feed-back equation of Space-time beings:

∆-1: $pe (Planar, Lineal, Past entropy limbs/fields/territories)<∆º-ST: Hyperbolic, Present re=productive Working-citizens-body-waves of Energy>Tiƒ:Informative Future cyclical heads-particles-informative classes: ∆+1

This canonical equation of space-time beings incorporates all the previous partial equations of the temporal ages, physiological functions and topological forms of all the ternary physical, biological and social systems of the Universe.

We have added sociological systems and its ternary ‘class structure’, where the lineal, flat territories of Gaia provide our motion and food, (social Spe), the citizens of a nation work and reproduce its good, as its ST-body and the elite neuronal classes that control its languages of information, financial money or bankers and informative laws or politicians, normally living in a small capital territory.

And we have added a final element, its structure in social networks made of parts, ∆-1 that become wholes, ∆+1, or ‘5th dimension’ of the scalar, organic Universe (ab. ∆), to fully become a complete description of all the systems of reality.

Thus once we define the metric equation of 5D and incorporate its ∆±1 organic scales to Γ, the Generator, we will thus have a template logic equation to describe all systems of nature and its processes of existence.

I have been studying the Universe with 3 time arrows and a scalar dimension of space, for so long and found so many amazing solutions and explanations to reality that I do not want all this to remain in my ‘Leonardian notebooks’ – so to speak. Thus I will keep pouring all this research on the scalar structure of a web I will do so in this ‘unificationtheory.com’ site for future researchers to be able to unravel the deepest structure of reality and wonder over Trinity, 5D and the scalar immortal Universe far more beautiful and richer than the models physicists sponsor with a single arrow of time – expansive entropy, which is only 1/3rd of 1 of its ∞ scales.

®ncyclopedia

The blog is a blueprint for an ‘¬Æncyclopaedia – the encyclopaedia of the Universe of Supœrganisms, as such it has a ¬Æ structure.

We first define in the main line, what the Universe is all about: a fractal reproductive  supœrganism of space-times (1st line) in which all species of all scales of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time follow the same laws, grouping in 10 isomorphisms that describe the world cycle of existence of all its supœrganisms, and the topobiological properties of those ∆ûst of space times, island universes, which think to be ∞ but are just dust and dust become.

Next in the 2nd  line we get ‘pros’ of stiences and describe all scales in stientific languages of the Human Mind (ab.Humind, Hm).

Thus departing from the Hm p.o.v. of knowledge and its languages of time (1st stience, time logic, and space, 2nd stience, mathematics, ) we describe  to describe with growing detail, the reduced Scales of astrophysical stiences (Max. |i|), then biological systems and finally our super organisms and worlds, with maximal detail of knowledge, but not of truth (as we see societies in a very distorted anthropomorphic form).

THEN the 3rd line describe   in a more objective manner, departing from the smallest plane of dark energy and neutrino, invisible gravitational fields, through the light-electrconic field, the atomic field of the z-2 scale upwards till arriving to the cosmological scale and beyond the ∞ games of decametric scales we call ‘God’, the Mind of the Universe. We do so the 10 sets of isomorphic laws, generated by all mind-mirrors of the Universe trying to maximise its function of existence, followed by all those scales of nested worlds and its stiences.

It is then obvious that after developing the main elements of the Universe in the first line, Space, Time, ∆§cales and its dimensions, motions and actions, which give birth to world cycles of exist¡ence we shall go into a second line view of the main fields of human sciences, Astrophysics, biology, social sciences (history and economics), and sciences of the mind-languages, essential to fully grasp the human condition and the evolution of knowledge.

THEN IN THE more complex 3rd and fourth line we will first develop the Disomorphic method studying with a series of frozen images at each stage, the full world cycle of an individual part of a species, which evolves fully only when it becomes a super organism of a higher plane of existence.

Then in the last line we shall study each of those planes and its main species according to the ternary Dimensions, motions and actions of any space-time being and its ‘template’ of a world cycle of existence from singularity to emergence in the ∆o plane, to the roles it will play in its ∆+1 world as part of a series of decametric social groups which if successful will emerge as an ∆+1 plane completing its cycle of existence.

Blog’s content – a fast review.
All this said the Blog was meant initially (the next paragraph explains why the plan has faltered), to become the blueprint for a future Encyclopedia of all stiences. But the model revolution has not come in my lifetime, now winding down, so I have reduced my job. Still the concept is simple.

The first line studies in a simplified manner focused in simultaneous space; the ‘fundamental particle of the Universe’, that is the super organism, as it traces its world cycles of existence between 3 ∆±I planes:

The first line thus completes a synoptic explanation of the reality of all beings of space-time ultimately originated by the Disomorphic equal properties of all of them, and their will of survival through the generation, reproduction and actions of its worldcycles. So in the third line we return to the theoretical perspective focusing through the Isomorphic method in the world cycle of all beings:∂

In the graph, the third line then studies again all those stiences and systems but now from the perspective of the world cycle through the ‘Ðisomorphic method’ where Ð doubles as a symbol for ‘Dimensions’ and the capital letter of ð, our symbol for time cycles:

  • “¬Æ: I-logic (as the geometry of the fractal space is non-euclidean, that is, each point has a volume that lets infintie parallel to cross it, and non-aristotelean, that is causation is not only lineal in time, from A to B, but ternary, as A<≈>B)
  • ‘Ðisomorphic: The CDE method of knowledge is considered in more detail, as the new more advanced ABC method of truth, sum of the Correspondence Principle with earlier true theories, the Disomorphic method that ads to those models the isomorphic properties dervied of the spacetime nature of all beings, and caps it as usual with the experimental method of hypothesis, deduction of consequences, prediction of futures and experimental proofs in the past, present and future.
  • -0points: Now we start properly the dynamic temporal analusis of the being as it develops its existence in time and space, departing from a first seminal seed that will…
  • -1∞ Γenerate as it surfaces from its o-1 temporal sphere of fast evolution in palingenetic mood in the equivalent 1-∞ external world where he is just a finitesimal tring to survive, grow and multiply
  • -2 Manifold, and to that aim it will start a series of exchanges of energy and information with the world, multiplying its form into bidimensional, fractal
  • -3 Networks that correspond to the entropic, energetic and informative neeeds of its cells/citizens/atoms (physical, biological and social systems) constructed
  • -4 through asy♣metric exchanges  of bits and bites of energy and information extracted from other T.œs through scalar
  • -5∆±¡ @tions, which amazing enough in the architectonical Universe are always played with the same hierarchicla order in time as all systems are constantly gauging information to move towards fields of energy in which to feed (simplex aei, actions of acceleration, energy feedng and information) which will latter be used in the complex social actions of offspring reproduction and universals creation (social evolution), the ou complex actions that define the being as an…
  • aging entity, since those actions are dominant in the first and final informative processes of gauging information and socially evolving through an informative language, so all systems grow in form into a 3rd age of maximal informtion and minimal entropy that explodes in death.
  • -in 6 species Yet in detail we can differnetiate them according to gender into S=t baolanced women and S<>T imbalanced man dominant either in limbs-motions or brain-form, or according to the dominance of each physiological network, which gives us 6 variations from top predators dominant in entropy to ‘mental’ species dominant in informative height, which makes species also go through 3 ages, called Horizons of increasing information, as it happened in amphibia that grew in height in 3 ages first as Dinosaurs-reptiles and then as birds, or mammals that became men, all of them living
  • –8 lifecycles, when we consider those variations of dual gender and ternary species inwardly within the system, and its networks, in terms of temporal evolution from generation, birth, infantry, youth… to old age and death… lifecycles which taoist philosophers cracked as the 8 baguas of its trigrams... 
  • –|0§ocieties, and all of them growing socially as the final strategy of survival of a species that becomes a succesful super organism (informative ants, informative humans, by far the most succesful species due precisely to their completion of the ‘whole run of existence’ ending into new scales of wholeness which makes them equate their body-mass to the rest of animal life…
  • –∧9planes Alas! we have now fully account with more or less detail with reality as it is and so it only rests to get in those ‘infinite details, which is what we are all, thoughts of God, the Dismorphic laws of the Universe, which will then be studied for each ‘species’ and plane of existence in the fourth line, a future encyclopedia of stiences in this planet, certainly written by other humble observers of the whole entangled reality in many other planets of the ∞ cosmos. Amen (:

We study from generation to extinction, the world cycle of ANY fundamental particle=superorganism of the Universe, dividing the process of a world cycle in 10 elements. In the graphs we compare both, the reduced spatial method of studying a super organism with 5 elements (first two lines) and the second method more extended:

The ‘Fractal Generator’ is studied from the 5 perspectives of its dimensions, in a bio-logic manner with the ‘Rashomon method’ (term taken of the Japanese master film with several versions of the same event). And the world cycle through the Disomorphic method in the third line.

Regarding the experimental facts, which should back the theoretical method, we study them in the second and fourth line, also with two degrees of quantitative and qualitative detail:

-In the second line we study the main stiences in terms of its super organisms, as humans classify them (astrophysical, biological, social systems, history and economics, and the languages of man, artistic, mathematical, verbal:

‘ ¬æstrophysics ¡›|2|‘biology¡‹|3|‘economic$:∆²‘history:∆1²‘humind ∆º:‘wor(l)d¹+ ‘²iMath

We do so adding to each of those disciplines the ‘plane to which they belong’.

So for example, the most extensive, astrophysics study multiple planes, which we can ‘reduce’ to a ternary scheme (quantum-microcosmos, thermodynamic human cosmos and gravitational macrocosmos). In a first comprehensive approach we study astrophysics in the second line, summarizing its 11 Ðisomorphisms of physical systems, given the fact that physics is a very formal stience, best suited from the most formal method of truth.

Of special interest is the first Isomorphism that defines the particle-points and singularities of the 3 physical scales, as accelerated vortices of time space, unifying charges and masses, with the long seek Unification Equation, which is trivial in 5D metric, as it is a series of key questions of physics, from the particle antiparticle, life-death arrow, to the ternary families of masses, particles and states of matter (its entropic, gaseous, liquid, energetic and informative crystal ages); which shows clearly how physicists by the mere use of a single arrow of time as a dogma, have completely disregarded the two other arrows of equal importance (liquid and crystals) not only in the cosmological scale but also in the thermodynamic and quantum scale (where the ∆ð-1 quantum potential, ∆ø ST- wave state and ∆§+1 particle state are the equivalents)

Further on we add two subposts, one on the philosophy of stience of the organic Universe, and the other on the basic species and world cycles of its 3 ∆±¡ planes of exist¡ence.

Biology just studies the planes around humans (cells, individuals and ecosystems) and languages the very fractal point of the mind (∆ø) and its temporal-verbal, mathematical-spatial and organic, T.œ languages. The approach to Biology in the second line will be also one of Generation but from a perspective of the 3 Planes of existence of physics, the ∆-1, molecular plane (bio-chemistry), the ∆ø, organic human plane (life and plants) and the ecosystemic plane, the ∆+1 World of Gaia. So we trace the process which evolved from the simplest amino acids the human being and beyond, guided easily by the laws of eusocial evolution of the fifth dimension.

The more polemic section though would be the analysis of the human scales, as we, humans are by definition singularities that perceive reality from our self-centered point of view, and so we always think to be special in the Universe. But we shall show that social sciences are organic sciences, humans mere cells of the super organism of mankind in time, aka history, a block of time that lives 3 ages, the young, entropic Paleolithic age of hunters, the reproductive ideal neolithic age in balance with Gaia, and the 3rd informative old age of technological evolution of metalife, machines which will give birth to the robotic organisms that displace us from labor and war fields – and if humans truly understood the Universe, would not evolve further, specially in its military forms, as the 3rd age of excessive information is followed always in all systems by an entropic death, which in the eco(nomic)system is caused by the evolution of new metal-weapons, in entropic wars. So the goal of history should be to control the evolution of meta life and maintain mankind in an ecological balance with the planet.

And then the fourth line would study each ‘plane of the Universe’ now with full consistency with the fractal organic Universe and the meaning of stiences… plane by plane from the ∆+4 cosmos down the ∆-4 neutrino/gravitational forces, through the ∆±2 biological and social planes to the ∆ø brain… each then subdivided into all the elements of the Disomorphic method: 

 +4cosmos +3galaxy +2star 2 ¹gaia 2²wor(l)d 2³$ 1¹Mð 1²life 1³Man ocell -1Mol -2¥e -3z -4ν

Each posts of the last line are divided further into 11 Disomorphisms, which time permitted will fully integrate all sciences and laws within the Theory of the Organic Everything (T.œ), as we shall deduce all its species and forms from those equal laws.

To stress the equality of all Ƥcales we start from the whole, the cosmos instead of the quantum world, since both interact=cause each other with its inverse arrows, NOT as physicists pretend with its constructionist theory of a single lineal arrow that cause reality departing from the smallest scale. Non-Aristotelian ternary logic does not work like that. Past and future are relative spacetime topologies that cause each other, webbbing the present, as only Einstein and Schopenhauer in mathematical and verbal space hinted at.

The reader should observe that as we come closer to the humind, ∆ø, the detail increases as indeed we perceive more information of closer forms in space and time. So the analysis of the Earth is subdivided into its 3 ages, which correspond to the 3 evolutionary phases of the planet as a block of time, the past of relative less information, the human present of history and the future metal-earth of maximal 5G information when the nervous flows of digital data perceived telepathically by robotic AI machines with autonomous solar skins it is bond to replace mankind, unless we understand the organic laws of the Universe and stop its evolution:

Gaia: Life-relative past < Present (History: man) > Metal-earth: relative Future: Machines

Indeed, as time is local, evolution of information can halt and elongate the life of any organism, specially those with ‘herd form’ as humans are in history, which are not totally controlled by the selfish neuronal, informative brain that exhausts its vital energy collapsing it into its temporal reversal or death.

And again, we also divide the lower plane of the human organism of multicellular life, (∆+1) into 3 different subspecies; biological life, human life and matter life, since all atoms can potentially reproduce life, and machines are organisms of metal, evolving fast into autonomous AI robots with telepathic minds and solar skins… which humans should FORBID if they want to remain as the top predator organism of this planet, but of course they won’t. Given the fact they do NOT recognize machines as evolving organisms, only themselves, the Universe as a living fractal only themselves, and the planet as an evolving cosmic body only themselves… have any property we cherish. To the point that as AI evolves the ‘AI effect’ consists in demoting those tasks AI makes better than men as non-intelligent. So soon, as AI makes everything better than men, to be intelligent will be to crap… Yes, of course I am being a crapot now because I am tired of the human ‘egocy’ (ego + idiocy) which is driving our species out of this planet.

3 pillars of T.œ.s stientific method: Experimental->Ðisomorphic->Correspondence. 

All this said we need to put some order and rigor – my fault – to a kaleidoscopic Universe, by considering the ad-on to the present scientific method, based in Experimental evidence, which of course, we also accept as the essence of science, even with more rigor (given the inflationary nature of information and mind mirrors). So as Einstein put it: ‘only experimental facts should be the concern of science’, since ‘I know when maths are truth=consistent but not when they are real’…

Thus we depart from the Experimental method ‘E’.

Then we apply the analysis in parallel of the new found ‘Ðimensional isomorphisms’, that is, laws extracted from the nature of space-time organisms, to enlighten with new insights the evidence about space-time events and organisms.

And in parallel we contrast those new insights with well-known models of science and knowledge, in any language that huminds have applied to understand reality, NOT only mechanical senses (clocks of time and telescopes/microscopes/cameras of space) but also human senses and languages (words of time, eyes of artistic sense), and ANY other syntactic language, mirror of the Universe, depending on which theory, model Corresponds in the tradition of Classic science and humind knowledge to the subject we deal with.

So the ‘new’ STientific knowledge used to understand any classic science of any PLANE of the Universe – as each one is studied by a different science which subconsciously acknowledge that scalar structure classifying sciences by plane of analysis, is simple, ternary as everything, departing from Experience, into organic and classic models of reality to wrap it all in a comprehensive, Kaleidoscopic view of reality, with all the languages. Wehreas truth is a probability, 1, for the being in itself that holds all its information, and increased by the number of views and languages of knowledge we apply to the system:

Maximal truth = Maximal number of linguistic mirrors applied to the being (Probability 1 of truth).

 So we talk of THE 3 LEGS OF THE Stientific enlarged method=EDC: Experimental Method+Disomorphic Method+Classic knowledge theories in Correspondence with those Disomorphic laws:

-The one: Experimental facts: WE DEPART from experimental facts of reality; space-time events and super organisms, which we shall analyse with Classic theories and new Disomorphic insights that enhance the depth of our understanding:

-The many: Correspondence Principle of Classic science: We then analyse under the ‘Rashomon effect’ proper of all mind spaces, and its kaleidoscopic inflationary languages,  the many theories and models huminds cast upon the experimental facts. In the mathematical case its spatial=geometric, social=numeric, Scalar=analytic and Symmetric=algebraci mirrors, which make multiple interpretations or partial truths of the event that reveal some ‘angle’ of truth on the single fact.

-The whole: Disomorphic method. And then we enlighten both, explaining the genesis of the event and its kaleidoscopic mind mirrors of truth, as a by-product of the isomorphic qualities of space-time  and its co-existing organic planes, species of super organisms and worldcycles. How much detail we establish in that final analysis depends on our focus and detail. So we start with the study of its DUALITIES in space-time (Steps of time=motion; symmetries on space, analysis and algebra in the mathematical mirror); continue with the study of its ternary symmetries using the Generator equation (S<St>T; ∆±1 planes; | xO = Ø topologies). And we might consider finally deeper analysis of the Rashomon effect (the 4+@ mind views on the event – ∆-planes, s, t, s=t and @-linguistic view).

A more thorough, realist investigation of any super organism and its world cycle, though will simply not deal with C and express in pure 5D terms the nature of the event, by studying the super organism and its 5² Dimensions of space-time ordered in space, as 3 x 3 +0 physiological networks and in time as a world cycle, sum of a series of ‘infinitesimal, vital 5 actions of space-time (Motion, information, energy feeding, reproduction and social evolution) that ensure its survival. And in scales as a series of co-existing, ∆±1 Planes which shynchronize its actions and clocks in symbiotic manner. And then if we want to focus in a certain element we apply the ternary fractal method, as each super organism is made of smaller super organisms, which can also be broken into ternary networks and parts, each one able to be studied in increasing focus with its 5D dimensions and ternary symmetries.

Obviously the blog focuses in this 3rd element trying to enlighten the enormous wealth of experimental data of science, languages and culture seen with the new eyes of E+ C+D.

So as experimental facts are all over the place used liberally and explained in all the web articles, let us do a brief account of the correspondence principle between 5D and classic spacetime science, which today is overwhelmingly physics; and then consider the formal principles of 5D ‘science’.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs (the last element, regardless of the modern digital method of sciences, who wants just pictures, data, facts, put in a single mathematical language, which zero ‘whys’ except the fact that the event ‘is’)… I am also fighting health issues and a decaying IQ-aging, but I am positive as of 2018, the stuff will grow to a point that huminds or AI if so they wish (AI obviously will NEED this blog, to understand itself and ‘why’ it senses), can upgrade its mirror-image.

My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence, which is precisely regardless of the shallow ideology of modern data-computer modeling conception of knowledge, to find those whys, and prove the Universe is NOT just a chaotic accumulation of data, but has a purpose, a structure and a vital goal: to create super organisms that trace world cycles, and have a will and a perception, enacted: to survive, grow, reproduce that is TO MAXIMIZE its ‘exi=st¡ence’.

General Systems and scalar space-time, 2 sides of the same coin.

Thus ∆ST theory is born of the fusion of two disciplines. A formal one: the creation of  the long sought mathematical and logic model of ‘relational space and time’ (the alternative model to Newton’s absolute time and space, first proposed by Leibniz and proved truth by the multiplicity of time clocks of different speeds in the Universe of Relativity theory and common experience – as a time clock is any cycle which from sun’s years to atomic orbitals from circadian cycles to life-death cycles exist all per reality).

Now this so evident fact – that time is cyclical and has different speeds – have been obscured by the ‘tool of measure’ invented by Newton – the equalization of all time clocks with the mechanical clock, and its ‘elongation’ into an abstract line in a Cartesian coordinates. Which is fine as it is an ‘artifact’ of measure. The problem with it is when it became ‘an absolute truth’, and the artifact of measure was confused with reality. Leibniz already noticed and explained that all what exists is NOT in an abstract Cartesian graph of lineal space and time – the artifact. But is made of a vital space, the space we occupy and a content of time, the sum of all our life cycles between birth and extinction.

We were made of time and space dimensions. And so the properties of those time dimensions (of past, present and future, the 3 phases of any cycle, which has a ‘beginning-past’, a middle term or steady state, repetitive frequency, when the cycle seems not to change or ‘present’ and a final phase when it dies away or future, old age), and the properties of those vital spaces (which can be seen as fixed dimensions, or as motions, hence the use of ‘vectors’ that combine lineal distances and motions to study them mathematically), were the key to find ‘isomorphisms’, similar properties in all beings in existence.

There was though, a 3rd element, in the structure of those spaces and times – the scales of organization of all systems, which happen to co-exist across a cellular/atomic, individual and cosmic, social scale of relative size. So space-time was ‘scalar’, ‘fractal’ and the size relative to our perception of it, which we improved with telescopes and microscopes.

And we were made not only of dimensions of time and space, but ‘dimensions of size’, and social organization, structures that were parts of wholes, units of bigger wholes.

So Leibniz said ‘the smallest point must be considered a world in itself’.

And indeed every ‘fractal point’ of the Universe, redefined with the completion of the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry, is both a world that encloses 3  spatial and 3 temporal Dimensions and a point from the higher perspective that evolves socially into 3³+s∧i=10S∧i scalar structures or bigger planes of existence.

And those ST-dimensions, social scales and planes common to all beings are the origin the ‘isomorphisms’, equal forms and laws that all systems of the Universe display.

And so this model of ‘∆ST ‘ isomorphic scalar space-time is the theoretical culmination of 400 years of observance of the Universe with ‘tools’ that peer on the 0±∆ scales of size of reality, clocks that measure its rhythm of time and rods that measure its size of space. The journey has been rocky and it is plagued of ‘errors’ caused mainly by physicists’ confusion of abstract tools of measure and ‘realities’. And by the lack of interest in the ‘ultimate whys’ that cause those realities.

Measure of course is OK, but it is not all what there is to science. Feynman famously said that the why is the only thing physicists do not ask. Well, it is actually the more important thing a scientist should be ask. Measure should only be the ‘how’ or previous step to ask the whys, without which science remains incomplete.

It is for that reason, I did not limit the model to physicists, which as we shall see is the origin of most conceptual errors about the Universe, regarding framed it into a philosophy of science which is wide enough to accept 2 basic concepts of ∆ST reality: its scalar, social structure, from where its isomorphisms originate, and its organic, social nature, as those scales are organized in networks that become the constitutive parts of the next ∆-scale.

The spatial single continuum of Physical models is a reductionist view of that wider reality, reduced to a single ∆-scale and only 4 dimensions. And so its philosophy of science is reductionist also as it only needs to explain that reduced part of the organization of reality.

Now, the word i, stands for ‘isomorphism’ or ‘invariance’ (in the 5th Dimensional compact model) which is the fundamental ‘theme’ analyzed in General systems.

And the 9 isomorphisms that all systems follow, derive of its Dimensions, Planes and social scales. As all of them:

Are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the 2 substances of reality, either seen in motion as energy and time, or in still form as space and information: S=∑e, T=∑o

Have accordingly a length, which is the direction of motion that consumes our energy; of height, the dimension of perception and information, stored in temporal cycles; and width the bilateral dimension of reproduction. And accordingly to be made of 3 topological organs, fields/limbs of energy, reproductive bodies/waves and particles/heads of information live through 3±∆ ages of time, an energetic, between our seminal birth in the ∆-1 scale and our death back to it: young entropic youth, an age of balance and ∆+1 social reproduction and a 3rd, old age of information.

enact through those spatial organs during our 3 ages, 3+i åctions, feeding on energy, gauging information, iterating=reproducing our systems and evolving socially into higher S1o social scales.

Till the system emerges into a higher ∆-plane of existence, or simply dies down to a lower ∆-1 plane, dissolving its information, and completing its world cycle of life and death.

Which they live from an ∆-centered point of view, doing so through the will of the ‘mind’, the zero point of maximal perception of the system that carries the informative order.

Thus all those isomorphisms have its cause in the fact that beings are made of the ‘same’ Dimensions of:

  • Space : Height, width, length.
  • Time: past, present and future ages.

And all of them form social groups that interact with the larger planes of reality,

  • Across 0±4≈ 9 Planes: from 0±4 Universal forces that move them to the cosmos which provides those forces, across intermediate 0±3 light/galactic scales that provide them with the bits of light-information, through 0±2 planetary worlds, which give them the energy to breath and feed, closer into its 0±1 cellular and social scales that sustain its individual self.

So both elements, the GS philosophy and its isomorphisms, and the scalar planes space-time formalism go together.

And they allow us to study in depth all the aspects of all those systems, or do so in extraordinary detail for each species, studying all those ‘isomorphisms’ and ‘social scales of evolution’, deducing all the laws of those systems from them.

So a good term for the entire ‘full science’ would be ∆ST, which puts together both terminologies, the philosophical and formal ones.

In a classic sense it would be the definitive form of ‘philosophy of science’ or  ‘metaphysics’, which studies the laws or Will of the Whole Universe, the Logos of reality.

GSTœ as a scientific revolution: a higher objectivity.

In the graph, true science consists in make human more objective about its not preferred position on the fractal, organ universe. First copernicus took us from its spatial centre, then Darwin from eternal time, Marx put man below the machines, weapons and money (organic, entropic and informative metal species, we shall call memes), and its company-mothers, which DO run the world, next Einstein put us out of any reference frame with its special and general relativity and finally GST (Ab. general systems theory) brings Absolute objective relativity about the position of man even in its relative scales of size.

As Schopenhauer put it: ‘man is just a mush over a rock in a corner of the Universe’. And yet the astounding beauty of the game, when it is properly, humbly, objectively understood makes ‘existence’ all what one wishes and deserves.

Those who however repress existence with absurd mandates against your reproductive pleasures (sex as sin), energetic food (dietary laws), social love (evolution into larger wholes) and deny its own ethic languages and species (verbal thought substituted by mathematics, the language of machines), as the dominant western civilisation does, enslaving for the evolution and reproduction of another species, the machine, will have no future, and no pleasure in existence, seeking for myths and other worlds, ending not even living in this one.

Since ∆º±st, is always a system with a mind/particle of information, body/wave of energy and limbs/fields of entropic motions; you exist simply speaking to maximise your limb/field motions, your body-wave reproduction and your head/particle of informative perception, regardless of the specific forms of those systems, and the languages of perception, mostly mathematical and visual you use to orientate your system on the game.

So ∆º±st will be the fundamental particle of the Universe, a fractal of causal scales of space-time, self-centred in a mind-mirror, which controls a finite vital space, has a limited duration in time and tries through its actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information, to survive, with a simple program of ‘actions’ that we shall express in a simple equation of ‘stationary points’: Max. E X I (S=T), MAXIMIZES your existence, by increasing ad maximal your entropy, e, information, i, and its product, or ‘momentum=existential force’, which happens when spatial entropy and temporal information are equal and in balance (S=t); since for any e+i, Max. e x i -> s=t (5 x 5 > 6 x 4  7 x 3).

This then the Universe in a nutshell, a fractal of entropy, energy and information, extended in three relative social, organic scales, in which each part is made to the image of the whole, always a supœrganim of  scalar space-time.

As we are now to study the ‘monad-minds’ of the Universe, and its linguistic formal mirrors, let us conclude with a resume in symbols of non-Æ logic (the enhanced formalism of time and space built with three arrows, scales and parts), the main arrows of the Universe.

As we have shown a deeper analysis of time cycles proves them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or  ‘dimensions’:

  • < (symbol of expansive ENTROPY flow), Ps: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
  • > (implosive, INFORMATIVE flow), ƒt: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
  • (symbol of iterative, present MOMENTUM wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion
  • Ω, W, ∑: Symbols of a whole 0-sum world cycle, which is conserved, often measured with the parameters of an energy conservative cycle.

And this give us the 3 main ‘variations of the Generator which describes existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

Time-like sequential events:   Ps (young entropic age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Ft (informative age) ≤ Ps (entropic death)

Space-like, simultaneous structures:    Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Scale-like social processes: with the quantum/cellular, ∆-1, ∆-thermodynamic/organic or ∆+1 gravitational/world scales in physical and biological systems.

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

The Universe is a broken puzzle of three motions of time, entropy and information, and its infinite energetic combinations, put together into knots, called beings and species.

The universe is simple. As there are 3 arrows of time-future choices bifurcate reality often in ternary paths. You can always go the way of entropy, and dissolve yourself, the way of energy and repeat your present exi=stence or the way of information and elighten yourself.

But what those three arrows of time, when they mix and merge into each other across those organisms, form? There is any intelligence in the flow of times? For that we must observe at the being as an entity in space, and then we see indeed that time arrows in space form complex organ systems where the functions of those arrows become vital physiological networks and systems on the living organism.

In that manner we observe the three arrows of time becoming (graph 2), three organs of space.

And this symmetry between functions in time and forms in space, is the fundamental symmetry of the Universe.

All Universal entities are fractal ternary systems of 3 dimensions of space, symmetric to 3 dimensions of time co-existing in 3 relative scales of ∆-size, giving birth to a fractal generator equation of space-time beings able to describe all beings that ‘exi=st’: ∆ºST±1:

Past, entropic, |-Spe limbs/fields < ST-Present-iterative energetic body-waves>Tiƒ: Future, informative cyclical heads-particles.

In the graph above some of the ternary systems of the Universe, its 3 topologies of space, each one forming one organ which maximises one of its 3 time dimensions, the relative simpler past, entropic, lineal motions performed by its limbs/fields; the relative present≈iterative energy, performed by body-waves and informative logic time clocks, the relative future head-particle that directs the being.

Below the 3 scales of physical and biological systems, the ∆-1 ¥-quantum=atomic scale; the ∆º thermodynamic scale, and the ∆+1 gravitational scale, which correspond to the human ∆-1: cellular, bio-chemical, ∆º:individual and ∆+1 ecosystemic level of our existence.

The most beautiful part of this blog is in that sense, the enormous simplicity of the fundamental equations of the fifth dimension and its immediate connection with the simple elements of reality, which by iteration of its dual and ternary principles we and future researchers shall raise through the 4 lines of this blog to encompass all what exist.

Now it must be understood at an even more general level that the Universe is all about the Generator:

Combining yin-formation and yang-entropy to give birth to present momenta and its waves of ∞ beings, evolved socially into wholes.

And yes, indeed i quote taoism because it was the first astounding highest verbal expression of the ∆±i ST pillars of reality, which mathematical physics has failed till this blog to properly understand.

 

VII. ∆+¡ 

MAIN SUBSPECIES OF  ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS

All this said, we just need to show you that we can encase all of physics, both its conceptual descriptions, physical parameters and equations within the structure of a 11D³ time§paœrganism made of smaller and part of a larger time§paœrganism… at least within the systems we perceive.

This is simpler to do when we consider that the scale we perceive, the thermodynamic scale is made of space-time organisms, living beings, and its larger system, the Earth is truly a space-time organism with slower time cycles (geological cycles of Gaia) – as in fact the word super organism was coined by the father of geology, Hutton to define the ‘slow time cycles’ of the Earth.

So once this is clarified, we just need to show you that the biggest and smaller supœrganisms of space-time we are conscious of – the galactic ∆+1 scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale show organic property and are both mathematically equivalent. So if we show you that in 5+5D s=t metric equations, both are equivalent, and the best observed one, the galaxy has organic properties, and so we can model easily the galaxy as a ‘gala cell’, an organic cell-like physical system, we will have in a very synoptic way latter expanded in great detail show you that all physical systems are 11D³ fractal space-time organisms.

∆±4: COSMOS

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information and then self-organizes networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. This obvious fact observed in the graph – but denied by the ‘creationist’ entitled human beings who prefer to think they are  the only intelligent, living part of it to their own peril; makes it a ‘pan psychic’ organic system. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, applying it then to all systems, including human societies and machines.

Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe.

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality:

On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.

The upper astronomical scales of physical systems, ∆+1, are in double symmetry with the lower quantum scales in ∆-1, when considering man at the ∆o relative center of both; as we observe that the co-inverse metric equations of fast, small atoms and large, slow galaxies give the same constant value, origin of the Unification equation of masses and charges.

On the other hand they show equal topology in ST, with its halo, likely of negative strangelets, black hole center of positive black holes modelled as top quark stars, and intermediate region of electromagnetic star nebulae.

THUS we can unify them through the concept of fractal scales with different space-time curvature and time speed such as:

∆-2: atom ≈ ∆+3: galaxy.

Both scales will follow then the general laws of 5D Metric space-time isomorphic beings.

For tat reason the reader is advised to consult first the most general post on 5D and Philosophy of Science, whose aim is to unify all sciences, and the general one on physical systems, ∆±i: Astrœphysical systems, before reading this post on Astronomy.

In case the reader goes forward, we introduce the absolute bare bone concepts of the organic, 5D fractal structure of reality, which are its 3 arrows of time and symmetries with the 3 space organs of al fractal systems of he Universe, and the Principle of relativity between motion and stillness.

In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-time in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.

Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature.

In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The duality of the big-bang: immortal organic Universe.

So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?

The answer requires to understand the new paradigm of fractal space (the scalar fifth dimension) and cyclical time (with its 3 arrows of probabilistic futures, informative implosion, entropic expansion and its balanced combinations of both, iterative momenta and its energetic zero-sum conserved worldcycles.

Then we can easily define a balanced Universe where the implosive vortices of galaxies balance the expansive dark entropy between them:

The split of the forces that enter the singularity into a still field of pure information and one of pure motion in physical systems give origin to the black hole t=0 + axis of hyperluminal speed (Kerr metric) and the electronic image of our minds coupled with the magnetic momenta through its poles.

In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of  clock-like vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry tÐhe in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; big-bangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of time-space, for each fractal part of reality:

Entropic past-space + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.

This process do happen in all the fractal scales of physical systems, So big-bang explosive deaths of matter: e=mc2 and its inverse creation of mass, m=e/c2 happen in all scales. Which obviously means if we rehearse big bangs on earth we will have a nova-like explosion of the earth NOT OF THE UNIVERSE.

The previous equation in formal terms is first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, and ultimately a particular expression of the new fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of present energy, combination of spatial entropy and temporal information:

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

This equation IS the Fractal Generator of Space-time beings that uses the definition of the three arrows of time, to establish a synoptic, logic equations for all systems of nature, where:

S, $, Sp means entropic, past or moving space; ∑∏, Ø, ExI, combined iterative energy (maximal motion) and Information (maximal form); T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the bio-logic and mathematical properties of the fractal paradigm of a Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time.

SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE (∆±4) and its ∆± 3- ‘GALACELLS’

IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal co-existing structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.

To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale, o the understanding of  the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. 

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe. 

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion.  All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space 

∆±3: GALAXIES

When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆-1 scales of the fifth dimension.

Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.

The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.

Now because all systems have, as all systems do:

  • organic, co-exiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
  • and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atom-galaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
  • besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.

in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that the ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆-2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; as we shall show:

  • The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.
  • And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.

The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of space-time structures.

To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical  scales.

So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the Spe-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dna-like’ gravitational species of information, ultra-dense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteins-strangelets’.

Each of those parts will be made at ∆-1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quark-atoms, of increasing mass.

So we find another ∆-1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆-1, quantum atomic physics):

  • Sp∃-negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘protein-like’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
  • Tiƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆-1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
  • While, we star-dust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galacies at its ∆ and ∆-1 scales:

Tiƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆-1 scale of size, at the compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.

Spe: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.

ST-energy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real big-bangs’.

This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, co-existence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc).

The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.

The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:

The Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…

The cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.

This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of time-space with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3-topological structure.

So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆-thermodynamic crystal and the ∆-1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.

Trinity indeed is  the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.

Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:

∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.

∆-3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.

∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.

∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wave-structure of the body of stars’.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.

∆±3 ATOMS

Next we can consider atoms as organisms, and to prove they can modelled as such we just will show their equivalence with galaxies, with the unification equation of both, as accelerated vortices of time-space and the obvious existence in atoms, of ‘the drives of organic live’, that is actions of energy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution, which biologists use to define life and are actions constantly perform by the fundamental particles that make up atoms, quarks and electrons, showing its vital nature.

The atom-galaxy

The study of electromagnetism with the laws of gravitation in any of the 4 self-similar interpretations corresponding to an ∆ or @ or S or T Biased view, and the similarity between the galaxy and the atom is the key to unify forces and resolve all the problems starting by the obvious hierarchical problem.

It immediately bring some obvious similarities. The strong force inside the atom-galaxy must be similar (remember a fractal is similar never equal), to the gravitational force of the galaxy-atom. And indeed, we immediately notice the similarities: gluon balls do have 2 or 0 ‘graviton-like’ or ‘Higgs-like’ spins; which correspond to the gravitational force within the galaxy-atom (graviton) or outside the galaxy-atom (dark world of Higgs fields). 

More surprisingly, gluons and gravitons are the only force that interacts with itself, thus making so hard the full understanding of gravitational and strong forces. 

It is even more pleasurable to observe the time inverse symmetries caused by the mind – but well beyond the comprehension of present humind logic – when comparing a fourth dimensional view (that of man over the smallish gluon) vs. a fifth dimensional view of the same process (that of man over the larger graviton). The distortions are easier to understand though in the simplest spatial parameter.  And show the enormous size of gravitational ‘interactions’ , with a Compton wavelength for the graviton over 1 year light.

It makes no sense however to apply the laws of quantum energy, such as e=hv, to calculate the energy-mass of the graviton, a whole different plane, as dependant on that compton wavelength, which puts the graviton mass in a ridiculous lower limit, as a recent paper has stated.

In general physics needs such a huge upgrading on conceptual thought that we shall leave it here. Only state that gravitons do have mass because gravitation as expressed in general relativity under c-speed , etc. happens only within galaxies, so the range of gravitational interactions is NOT infinite. And so we are into certain type of corrections to relativity called massive gravitation, which clearly differentiate how gravitation behaves inside the galaxy and outside the galaxy where it becomes a repulsive ‘electromagnetic force’.

Finally to notice a constant we shall consider often in other more ‘pro’ sections of the blog – the fine constant, 137 or 1/137 which shows the difference of strength between many forces, the Strong force is 137 stronger than the electromagnetic force, which is around 137 times stronger than the electronic force which is around 137 times slower than the electromagnetic force, which is 137 times weaker… and so on and so on. Why then 137? This got eddington crazy – pity, with heaviside and Hoyle my fav triad of underrated british geniuses of physics, too close to reality for people to understand. But indeed poises an interesting question of numerology easily resolved in ∆st… Two alternative hints, 137 is the golden ratio angle of reproduction and it is a very special ‘prime’ in theory of numbers, and we shall leave it like that.

Of more interest though is to consider those self-similarities between the strong and gravitational force, and its components.

I.e. the gluon vs. the neutrino, the proton vs. the black hole and so on. In the gluon vs. neutrino parallelism we can also observe how there are 3 temporal frequencies/colors in neutrinos, which mix in ‘couples’ and ‘ternary structure’ as gluons do, showing once more the similarity (not equality) between those landscapes.

How the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative past, present and future and ∞ scales of the fifth dimension? The answer is weird enough to explain all the weird features of physics, nobody makes sense of it today, from the constant of c-speed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum uncertainties, etc. etc.

And the key as always is the most ill-understood element of the Universe, time and its 3 arrows, including local travels to the past, which being local either as an entropic devolution of the information of the system in the moment of death does NOT provoke any type of ‘twin’s paradox’ and travels in time – as in the Universe of infinite fractal closed time cycles, a past-travel is within the system inner ternary parts.

Time travels do NOT happen in an absolute newtonian Universe with a single mechanical clock; an astounding aberration of thought that merely shows how little understood the Universe of infinite time cycles is; so the kind of aberrations of ill-interpreters of relativity such as Hawking who thinks you can enter a black hole and come back into the past and kill your father never happen.

It is then possible to consider time travels from a future of more information to a past of less information; and define information as the natural arrow of future which constantly increases through the 3 ages of the being, and an entropic death, big-bang or biological, which expands in minimal time – a quanta of the time of the being in fact – as the natural travel to the past, in which the content of information of the being spreads to devolve it to the evolutionary past.

But what about the ‘relational present’, which we observe together simultaneously (Einstein)? This ‘absolute time sum of all other times does NOT exist per se’ but only in the mind of the observer.

So in fact, as the observer is moving towards its sequential future, in slow time changes, and death happens so intensely in so little time – an explosive quanta of the time of the being – a second in human death, a ‘planck’s time quanta’ in the equations of ‘local big bangs’. We see travels to the past as simultaneous present explosions in space.

So the essential perception of time at psychological, mental-measure level is either a simultaneous present – which is in fact the relative travel to the past-death of a being – and the sensation of present to future motion through the life arrow.

Those are the 2 commonest perceptions of time, that gives us the 2 fundamental sensations of psychological time:

– Present time when things do not seem to change because they repeat themselves, or PROPER PRESENT (for the local, objective being).

-Subjective present: which is for the being an objective travel to the past, with explosive lost of information. Yet such travel to the past seem to happen in instantaneous non-local space; as it is so fast in single time quanta that seems a process of spatial scattering that gives us the impression of a ‘simultaneus connected space’. It does not seem to happen from future to past. 

– Past to future through the 3ages of life of increasing evolution, balanced by the future to past death.

But besides those 3 time arrows of a single system with its dualities of subjective external and objective local perception of time, which will account for an enormous number of spooky effects; there are time travels through the scales of the fifth dimensions, which will add more complexity to the mix.

As here we must consider an ABSOLUTE ARROW OF TIME. Since motion is reproduction of form, and so every step we give ‘in the right direction’ means the whole must be reconstructed in an adjacent region of space-time all the pyramid together again, and so the whole which co-exists with its parts is IN FACT also displaced a quanta of time (the quanta here is used to reproduce the next scale of the being). So your mind is displaced ‘literally in sequential time as observed by the integration of the three scales into a single being’ into the future. You are a quanta of time respect to your wave-body which is a quanta of time displaced above your cellular cycles. And this ‘fact’ of which they are also many proofs provokes multiple spooky effects of physics that also can be upgraded to other systems.

But things get even more beautiful when we realise that entropy and information have inverse time arrows, literally within a local superorganism travelling to the past and the future, so as one is in the future and the other on the past, and have inverse way to travel=deliver information and entropy, both are in the present, and for that reason the present body-wave, the past-entropy traveling to the future and the future informative singularity sending messages to the past do come together in a synchronicity present despite to be elongated in time.

So after all Einstein was wrong when he said to quantum theorists who accepted local time travel to the past that ‘wires’ do not travel to the past.

I.e. German researchers have found that the ‘action of thought’, happens after the body moves in an almost instantaneous microsecond – so in a present position even if your consciousness of thought seems to be in the past.

All this explains non-locality and simultaneity and co-existence.

But there is even more to the different motions and speeds of time. As time has different speeds, faster in smaller systems, smaller systems live in psychological time more in lesser time, so an ant-queen of 7 years living 10 times faster, has 10 thoughts for one of you and lives 70 years of mental time. 

And more…  As time systems are faster in smaller systems, smaller systems code more information that larger systems and so information moves upwards, so genes code bodies, memes code societies and quantum number and particles code atoms, and viceversa, entropy-coordinated motion and hence energy is provided by the whole, external membrane which synchronises the parts as it happens in the simpler systems and the complex galaxies where all parts move in coordination.

A final fundamental set of laws of the many games of time in a universe of infinite time clocks concerns with the long absolute arrow of evolution of information and social evolution in co-existing systems; as the arrow of social evolution and organisation is in the future, but since a system more complex does have more need of coordination, it must code more information in the lower scales.

For example, in genetics the coding of multicellular organisms is in the epigenetic ‘supposedly’ trash part of the code, in ever growing triads of triodes that should code functions for larger and larger whole systems of the multicellular organism, a thesis advanced in my first books on time decades ago, which is now as so many foreseen laws of science and cycles of time – including cycles of history and economics – a fact of science.

But perhaps the most fascinating process of them all, is the palingenetic processes across the fifth dimension that compresses, and packs as we do in computer systems, the information of the organism through its evolution in 9 months, where all the trials and errors of the organism are limited and only the right process are processed to evolve a human in a process that dilated in space played in 3 billions years.

How this magic happened is obvious: minds are everywhere, in a pan psychic Universe, so DNA cells and chemical brains DO consciously eon after eon reduced linguistically by the same token a film or a novel or a speaker reduces the events to the parts that matter, with the languages of man, the evolution that matter of the being. 

Let us then start with a proper upgrading of the fundamental modern field of mathematical physics, quantum to a realist space-time view.

FRACTAL=ORGANIC, ETERNAL=MOVING, TOPOLOGICAL, SENTIENT UNIVERSE

So the change of paradigm from absolute space-time to a Universe of relational space-time beings is likely not to succeed – indeed we should get accustomed to the fact that most humans, most of the time, understand nothing and cannot be upgraded – that is, our species is not a preferred one able to fully understand the ‘tao’ , the laws of yin-formation and yang-energy, of form and motion that create the infinite qi beings. Most species of the Universe are parts of wholes they don’t understand and don’t reflect upon their condition but merely act. Good enough. Still in our attempt to communicate as ‘neuronal cells’ of the super organism of mankind, which so much could profit from a true understanding of the laws of the Universe, we are doing a huge effort of implication and codification of 30 years of research in this web, whose purpose is to leave a trace of all that research in the simplest possible terms.

To that aim the guidance will be always the simple architectonical structure of the Universe and its 3 defining elements, ∆±¡ planes of co-existence, according to 5D metric of all systems of nature, which give them organic properties and define the Actions of survival of the being that exchange across those planes, energy and information; the 3 topologies/dimensions that define the ternary organs of all systems and its functions in time, maximized by those spherical, informative particle/heads  hyperbolic iterative body waves and lineal limbic moving systems.

Its is all reality that simple: fractal scales of topological space and cyclical time bring immediately 3 vital properties to reality:

The Universe has 3 properties which our simplified single time-space continuum misses: because it is made of scales it is organic, as those scales transfer energy and information between them, creating networks and organic structures; because it is made of similar beings, is mathematical as a number is just a society of undistinguishable clones, because it is made of space, it is ternary and topological, as space is a geometry of 3 topologies, planes, spheres and hyperboles, and finally because it is made of motions=changes=times, NOT of space=form, a Maya of the senses, it is temporal, in constant flow of motion, but also sentient, as our still perception of it, is a ‘mental, still, linguistic, formal image’ which happens also in other singularity (crystal images in physics, still seeds of information in life). All those properties that are inherent to reality – organic scalar structures, topological, ternary geometries, temporal motions through 3 ages of existence and sentient linguistic still singularities make a complex fascinating reality we shall describe in this blog with multiple different languages, as each monad/singularity maps the Universe in its mirror image with a different biased perspective.

We hold then as a self-evident truth, even if we cannot see within the singularities of eddies, charges and masses, knowing though that time-motion comes to zero in the center of black holes (Einstein’s equations), vortices and charges that physical systems do hold mirror images of mathematical, geometry nature which in an automated manner guide physical systems through its potential fields in which they feed, as wave-particle organisms akin to the body-heads of biology, as all systems are made of vital space-energy and informative particles, whose spherical form stores maximal information in minimal space. It is also quite likely that the Universe is sentient as we are also made of vital space bodies and informative heads which sense; so the properties of our spacetime organisms must be shared by any other atomic species, as we show below. Indeed, the unit of life seems to be NOT the carbon atom but the particles, quarks and electrons that host the properties of life, reproduction, feeding, gauging of information, motion and social, magnetic evolution. Below an image of different fractal organisms in the Universe in different scales:

The multiple properties and languages of scientific knowledge.

The Universe speaks ‘infinite languages’ (Upanishads) NOT only mathematics. And each of its elements had the following minimal properties, which I called the isomorphisms of the Universe:

  • A Œ linguistic, mental point of maximal information (C.P.U., quark, crystal, brain, roots, black hole and so on), which constantly switched between the 4 states of space, time, energy and information, the 4+û actions developing the game; whose equations were crystal clear in quantum (4 numbers), Electromagnetism (3+color dimension), Electricity (4 Maxwell equations), and easy to deduce in Mechanics (i.e. Hamiltonians describe its 3 time ages,  4 vector equations, etc.)
  • A topological, Organic, Synchronous, ternary structure in space Sp<ST>Tƒ, of limbs/fields<bodies/waves>heads/particles.
  • And its asymmetric, Diachronic, causal order in time, Sp (Past, entropic youth)> SP, Present Adult reproduction > Tƒ, Future, Formal, Old age of information; from where topological laws of development and evolution and the ages and horizons and diversification of species could be obtained.
  • An organic structure in the 5 Dimension of ∆-1, ∆, ∆+1, quantum/cellular, individual, Thermodynamic and Gravitomagnetic, ecosystemic Planes.
  • A survival, active program of existence through ∂a,e,i,œ,û to regain ±∆e, i and evolve socially into bigger wholes, imposed by the fact that only those species who perform those actions survive.

And finally to explain the fact that points of view do act seeking the absorption and emission of energy and information, a likely pan psychic pain x awareness (time dilation) and pleasure x forgiveness (spatial extension) duality of sensorial perception, which focuses systems on their modular choices of actions to perform, even at the minimalist particle level.

Now each science does have its own jargon, and ‘choice’ of characteristics it prefers to describe from its elements of study, under the ego-paradox that makes each point of view to create a ‘particular world’ that distorts the ‘whole Universe’ into its perceived linguistic mind, with itself at the center and only relevant point of view.

We have in that sense criticize physicists from their description of physical reality ONLY from a mathematical, spatial, point of view, and ONLY describing of the 6 motions of reality, its Locomotion, making a confusing distorted vision of what time is in lineal terms and space is in continuous terms, ignoring completely the laws of the 5th dimension.

But we have generalized the concept to the quantum and Antiquantum paradoxes for all physical and social sciences, in which either the observer is too small (social scientist) or too big (physicist), to relate objectively to the observable (which in social sciences is so big that is guilty to deform the sociologists to cater its view, and in physics is so small than the physicist is guilty to distort it.)

And for that reason only biological sciences do have a proper point of view. But even in biology the cultural influence of social sciences is all too evident, as ‘the concept of chaos and entropy’, from physics and ‘Darwinian, capitalist, self-made man individualism’ sips in.

So it is taboo to talk of the fundamental law of social evolution which is social love of members of the species to become larger beings, which is epitomized in the most successful species on Earth, the Argentinean Ant which has excluded from the pampa all other top predators of larger size, and now is colonizing as we speak, under my foot South Europe, becoming the largest, most numerous species (1/4 of all the flesh living in this planet is ant, another ¼ humans, the 2 social species).

And on the other hand the concept of chaos and entropy has prevented to understand the topological plan of evolution, controlled by the fact that we are made only of space and time, and its similar ‘active’ concepts of kinetic energy and information.

So the explanation of why wings are planes of space and eyes spheres of time… and have evolved so fast, is ignored. The reason though is obvious in T.Œ, a system to survive has only 3 paths, maximal Tƒ in its spherical organs of information, maximal Sp, in its planar organs of kinetic motion and maximal reproduction, improving its networks of communication, either individual or social. And so this implies with the limiting existence of only 3 topologies in the Universe, that those 3 natural paths can evolve very fast, as genetics do work also in ternary symmetries that code those forms.

Further on from physics, biologists have acquired the idea that all comes from the bottom up, so they do not understand the duality of hyperbolic information vs. elliptic motion, which makes also the upper wholes program through larger fields of motion and form, entropy and information, space and time, kinetic and potential energy, lineal and angular momentum variations (all concepts self-similar of the fundamental duality of the Universe, which apply to different systems), its smaller parts. The most obvious case is the relationship between glaciation ages of maximal evolution of information (as cold temperatures imply form) and hot periods of maximal reproduction, (radiations of species) and the whole structure of evolution of the Earth in III earths and 3 x 3 + 1 sub-phases.

And so for each species and ‘scale’ studied by a science, we needed to extract mental, topological, causal-logic, and organic-survival properties, which were different linguistic, isomorphic angles on the perception of the being, none of them carrying the whole truth of the being, but as the famous elephant parable, seeing only a part of it.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.07.08

TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental fractal scales of space, and time cycles that ‘generate’ all the elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

We could resume the postulates of the scientific method in a simple formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

Œ=Sc3: Objectivity, Linguistic, Isomorphic Perspectives, Experimental evidence = Simple, Minimalist, truths – Ockham’s razor, Correspondence Principle, Cyclical repetition – Predictability and Complexity born of the ternary, fractal constant subdivision of reality into parts).

Now of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘Linguistic Isomorphisms’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of Œ (-:

That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).

All those point of views harmonize each other and reinforce the existence of a being. And they are the origin of the 5+5 qualitative and quantitative isomorphisms we use to describe all systems of reality). So we shall apply that methodology as we have done with other systems to astrophysics to describe the Universe and prove that is all what we need to describe reality.

So we have to adapt present theories of the Universe to the 5Dimensional, fractal, cyclical nature of space-time.

How the present Cosmic theory of reality, the big-bang Paradigm fits within that scheme?

Surprisingly enough it rather fits easily, but at present, it shows also some contradictions and limits which might be considered faults of ‘Objectivity’ mainly due to the anthropomorphic desire to explain it all from the human limited perspective.

So while we will introduce the translation of the Big-bang to 5D astrophysics, which would be a bone to get 5D accepted by mainstream science, we will be ‘objective’ to the extreme and conclude that while the big bang is a possible theory of the Universe, in the cyclical, commonly accepted version (with inflation and a final big crunch end, so it becomes a constant cyclical Universe) there is a more objective vision of the Universe, ‘absolutely relative’, and enlarged with infinite scales of space-time, in which the big-bang or an alternative cosmic Universe of trillions of galaxies, in which the cosmic explosion should be just a local phenomena of a local Universe, represent merely another scale of physical systems, as those of quantum particles, molecular atoms, states of matter and cosmic bodies.

Again, this concept is also handled profusely by astrophysicists, albeit by the obvious problem of lack of evidence, at the theoretical level, with the concept of a lower scale – the Planck scale of strings belong the particle scale of the 5th dimension and a larger scale above the galactic scale – of cosmological strings, in correspondence with the world of micro-strings.

We won’t analyze that level beyond considering some necessary corrections in a Universe of ‘background independent space-times’, as it is purely theoretical, and so this post will be dedicated to the analysis of the big-bang from the cyclical, fractal nature of space-time and the highlighting of its ‘scientific problems’, from the perspective of philosophy of science and the rules of epistemological truth we have summarized in the 6 rules of the mnemonic formula, Œ=mc2 (objectivity, Evidence, etc.)

Along the way of course we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.

Now, the fundamental conclusion of the scientific method regarding to astrophysics is obvious but only Einstein pound on it – as he was the only physicist we save as philosophers of science, for respecting the scientific method of true evidence, and simplicity:

‘Physicists should not be occupied with the study of events or species of which there is NOT experimental evidence. Since it is not science’.

And ‘I know when mathematics are truth but NOT when they are real’.

In brief, a physicist must use only the available particles and entities to construct the universe, not those that its mathematical, inflationary distorted linguistic mind view wants to crate for the pleasure of it. Information, minds are inflationary. They are a dime a dozen billion, to put it mildly but worlds of linguistic nature are not reality.

So we will build in Tœ, the Universe perfectly logically explaining al phenomena only with the available particles and forms, and the ternary symmetries of the 5th dimension, fractal space and cyclical time

 THE ULTIMATE ANSWERS: PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND RELIGION

‘Nihil est sine ratione.’ Leibniz

 The earlier mechanist linear models of space-time of physical sciences failed in its search for the ultimate answers to our existence in the Universe, signified in the commentary of Feynman, happy with a simplex, external description of the Universe, without its whys. Yet not all scientists gave up on their search for the full understanding of those whys – the thoughts of God in the dictum of Einstein- which all scientists agreed should be found in the ultimate ‘causal reasons’ of the universe – the nature of space, time its dimensions and causal processes.

It will then come as a huge surprise to the reader that the finding of those whys to the existence of the Universe is much simpler than anyone might imagine, as it requires only two basic upgrades in our concepts of space and time – foreseen in the earlier work of Aristotle and Plato, in classic philosophy, Taoism and Hinduism in classic religions, in the pioneer work of Leibniz and Descartes, the fathers of modern philosophy of science, and the physical insights of Einstein and Planck in the multiple nature of time clocks and the quantum, broken structure of space.

Those 2 upgrades illustrated in the next graphs are:

  • The understanding of the cyclical, NOT lineal, Nature of time, AS all time clocks are closed cycles that repeat certain actions and events with a given discontinuous frequency, origin of the causality and patterns of science.
  • And the scalar structure of space, which is composed of quantum, smaller parts that ensemble in networks of similar ‘Non-Euclidean points’, which become whole larger structures again ensembled into larger wholes in a game of russian dolls that gives organic, co-existing, fractal properties to space. They will define a ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar space-time and its formal ‘metric equations’, the key to unveil the ‘world cycles’ of life and death of all systems, born in seminal seeds of a lower scale, emerging in a larger world, returning back in death…

This r=evolution of our concepts of space and time, made more complex by adding form to time cycles and scales to space, does follow the basic law of epistemology – the correspondence principle, as it includes the previous paradigm of science, since lineal single time arrows are merely the limit of a ceteris paribus analysis of cyclical time in a single dimension, and 4D space-time, the limit of study of space-time scales in the human light space-time continuum (which the very same Einstein already broke, when adding General relativity and the study of the Non-euclidean scale of gravitation, now fully understood as two different scales of the fifth dimension). So we shall merely upgrade in different posts those previous simplified models of reality to fully grasp the cyclical and scalar nature of space and time.

Which in turn will lead to an upgrading of the Formal ‘Stiences’ of mankind:

  • Spatial mathematics, evolved from ‘Euclidean concepts’ of ‘points with no-breath’, into Non-Euclidean fractal points with an inner volume of information through which ∞ parallels might cross – completing the formal r=evolution started in the XIX c. by lobachevski and Riemann, applied then by Einstein to understand the two scales of space-time perceived by humans (gravitational and light space-time).
  • And the upgrading of Aristotelian logic, based in a single arrow of time, into a ternary, temporal logic, in which the three arrows of time co-exist to create an event, foreseen in the dualist logic of eastern philosophies (taoism, hinduism) and Hegelian Dualism.

Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.

The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view. But they do enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe.

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe. We can then write a simple Space-time equation which will represent all beings of reality:

Γœ:  Spe (external, entropic membrane) < St(vital space) > Tiƒ (singularity).

We shall call each of those Generator-Mind-supœrganisms, a ‘Γ.œ’, a temporal, organic system and so define the Universe, as the Organic theory of everything – a sum of space-time beings.

U¡=T.œ=∑Γ.œ

An interesting property to consider at this stage regarding the time clocks of the three parts of the being is its synchronicity. Indeed, consider your three parts, limbs/legs, body-heart and mind-eye, the three are synchronised to your unit of information/clock of a second, the glimpse of an eye, the beat of the heart, the rhythm of a one meter step (your unit of space) But those are human measures. A system does is both ‘pegged in space’ and isolated by a membrane from the rest, ‘breaking space into inner and outer parts’ (first postulate of topology: a closed loop breaks space). And with an inner synchronised clock. And this is also the case of physical systems, as we shall see when studying the realist interpretation of quantum physics (Einstein->Broglie->Bohm), which departs from the assumption than the ‘quantum field, body-wave and particle ternary parts’ of the quantum system have an inner synchronised clock (complementary wave-particle theorem).

The study on how time clocks are in harmony is then a huge new field of science which will reveal truly the workings of all being.

It is this ‘generator equation of space-time beings, centred in the ‘world-mirrors/monads/minds’ that orders its ternary parts, the fundamental particle-equation of the Universe, which in its infinite variations represents all beings in existence.  And the very fact that mathematical systems are always self-centred analysis of reality departing from such 0-points of view, the proof as those earlier philosophers of science postulate, that we exist in a sentient vital Universe.

Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the energy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.

In the graph we can see physical monads, charges and masses, which do have always a dense, informative center, surrounded by an energy body closed by a membrane (the quarks of the atoms closed by the membrane of the electron, the head and body closed by the skin, the mathematical pov, with its surface, integrated below the external curve, and so on. There are many ways we can see those structures, many details and laws we shall extract of the interaction of its parts, but the ultimate essence of the space-time being and its three parts, Tiƒ<st>Spe will remain.

Now in as much as the singularity is perceiving a territory closed by a cyclical membrane, either seen as a solid form or a moving cycle, the mind is NOT possible to be defined WITHOUT the territory of order and the event horizon, limit of its ‘self’ and close territory of order and perception. And so the mind is in itself a ternary organism, ab. œ, hence the name ∆œ and the symbol Œ for the mind as a point ∆º that moves Ξ, through the three planes and structures of its supœrganism.

Mind and supœrganism are thus defined by each other: the actions of the œmind brings the potential organism into actual being.

Consider the best known equations of science, and how they portray this reality in the scales of masses and charges:

  Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism reflect the fact that a charge, the singularity of an electromagnetic system (first equation), will have an electromagnetic ‘field’ around it, its vital space in which to exchange energy and information (3rd & 4th), encircled by a magnetic membrane (2nd equation), conforming the three parts of the being and its basic exchanges.

While Einstein’s equation and similar ones of Poison and Newton, define how ‘time curves space’ into masses sunk inwards towards a singularity-point. The outer membrane – the magnetic field or electron, or curved space-time thus encircles a vital space, always self-centred into an attractive≈in-formative p.o.v.

And while physicists are never concerned with the why of those structures, only with the measure of its forms and motions and the extraction of mathematical laws that could describe them, a philosopher of science must have a wider logical point of view, extracting as we shall do, from the equations of science, the ‘underlying’ ∆ºst-ructures which will reveal its ultimate whys similar=isomorphic to those of all other st-beings.

We are all beings made of a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cyclical time… with a central singularity or frame of reference that orders it all…

In that regard, the meaning of a supœrganism it is much more extended than in the usual biologic sense – the Unit of the Universe is a ternary system with an enclosed cyclical membrane, a singularity of information and a vital space used by the singularity to perform survival actions – and this extends to a ginormous rage of beings, from cells to atoms, to galaxies, to humans, to machines controlled by a human ‘enzyman’, which vitalises it, to the most bizarre events you might image. Consider the image on the side. The whale creates the barrier of bubbles, enclosing a vital space of fishes and then it enters through the center to feed on the vital space.

The ternary system lasts a few seconds; the bubble barrier is ‘imaginary’ (and perception in a fractal universe being relative plays an enormous role in ‘camouflage systems’, herding and control, specially in complex informative species as humans are so in sociological systems will be the key to many events). And the vital space is consumed very fast y the ‘multiple nuclei’ of the singularity – the whales; which on top are much bigger and denser than the whole system; but the essence is the same than the more complex and more canonical or enduring systems. Because as we shall see the Universe has only three topologies and so the basic combination of reality is always the same: a cyclical patterns that encloses, breaking into ‘fractal parts’ (first knot theory) an inner and outer region, and an informative center that forms in the enclosed region, taking control of the body enclosed by the membrane, which works together with the singularity, as in the protein-membrane/DNA-nuclei that prey and control the cytoplasm of the cell; the electron and quark that control an inner electromagnetic/gravitational field, and so on and so on.

We are all beings composed of a membrane of time cycles that encloses a vital space of energy, self-centered into a singularity of information, monad or mind, mirror of the external world we order.

 

I-logic definition of the Universe.

We must stress that the languages of perception/information that minds/singularities use to map out reality and then order it back through its local wave body are infinite, but some are more focused in space and time, its 2 elements. And since time=motions are more important than space, the language that better describes time which is logic is more important than the language that better describes space, topological mathematics – reason why indeed mathematics is proved with logic statements, albeit with an axiomatic logic which is faulty and so we have also to evolve mathematics .

SO let us make a Non-Aristotelian, Non-euclidean, ‘I-logic definition of the Universe’ to highlight its key logic properties.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of 4 ternary A(nti)symmetric (ab.¬Æ) elements, Space, Time, ∆§cales, l@nguages related by…

Operandi: which can either annihilate or evolve the elements together, in two inverse motions which we shall call Balance≈symmetry that gives birth to ‘5D’ social evolution, Λ> or Perpendicularity V< antisymmetry that causes entropic dissolution-death:

  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms.
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that come together EMERGING as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð:  a SYNCHRONICITY of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions:

3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings.

And 2 complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.

It has to be noticed that creation is composed of two operandi, the balanced wave-state and the particle that emerges into the ∆+1 world: ≈ ˆ as  a present-future coalitions, as opposed to entropic destruction, which is a simpler V form, a theme of enormous repercussions in all forms of existence essentially wave-particles preying over entropic dissolutions.

The study of those 4 elements and its operandi, which result in a social evolution together, or an entropic destruction is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

WE HAVE highlighted the key ‘logic elements’ of those systems, which are profound laws of structure that define the Universe in its most abstract form.

So now that we know what is the super organism of space, across 3 scales of size and 3 adjacent topologies, we can consider how it ‘evolves’ from birth to extinction in time, creating a super organism’s world cycle of existence and that is all we need to ‘define a fractal logic generator’ that mirrors all systems of reality and it is the LOGIC UNIFICATION EQUATION of all systems of nature, NOT a mathematical equation but a LOGIC one that encodes topological fractal=organic and temporal properties.

PHYSICAL  SCALES: ASTRŒ-PHYSICS

5D Cosmology. The fractal Generator:  Sp<≈>Tƒ

Perhaps the most extensive field of T.Œ is astrophysics – the study of the scales of matter. It is in fact the one I have researched more after the superorganism of history, despite or perhaps because they are not the self-evident biological planes of existence, where T.œ fits directly like a glove to an entangled hand, Einstein permitted (-;

We want to bring in this introduction only one theme, with many branches, the fractal scalar nature of physical space, along planes of the fifth dimension and once we generate its equation deduce from it the Unification equation of charges and masses, the Saint Grail of mathematical physics, searched for a century with no results (as they are time vortices of 2 different, limiting scales of the Universe) and then the big-bang cosmology and finally the question of the wave-particle conundrum of quantum physics and the meaning of Universal constants. They are the 4 most researched themes of physics, and that is the reason why we shall do a fast survey of 5D improvements on them.

Let us consider it briefly before describing biological systems with the same Generator equation of 5D fractal space-times.

The particle state: masses and charges: vortices of time: clocks of information. Tœs.

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4th is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

So Einstein, used those non-Euclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.

Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘mass-power’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M = k ƒ.

This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation E<=>Mc2:

Some case examples of astrophysics.

Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:

  • The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.
  • The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
  • The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.

 The Three Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Sp (Halo)<ST: stars >Tƒ: black hole. 

PARTILESScreen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.

So we must construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:

  • III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter  that correspond to:
  • III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to
  • The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.

The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:

|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.

So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halo-membrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its body-wave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator:

A galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. We shall unify both systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension that orders all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 00.01.57

And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale. So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of young-entropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).

And inversely in the anti-quantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or military-politico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.

So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.

And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:

So first let us Generate all the symmetries of the cosmos, ∆+1, ∆-galaxy and ∆-1 stars with 5D ST:

The 3 planes of Galaxies:

∆-1(particle/atomic scale)> ∆:star-thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational, cosmic scale:

Sp(Gravitational curved space-time fields)≤ ST (Light-neutrino waves)≤ Tƒ(Cosmic bodies)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age.

In the description of Œ∆=3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆-1: Stars

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Sp: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei

∆: Galaxy: Sp: Halo ST: ecliptic arms ≤ Tƒ: Black hole

∆+1: Cosmos: Sp: Wall of fire? ≤ ST: galactic plane ≤ Tƒ: Great attractor?

Time Ages:

∆-1: Sp: Gas Nebulae≥ ST: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole

∆: Sp: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ST: Spiral Galaxy≥Tƒ: Globular, Dark or Cannibal

∆+1: Sp: Big-bang? ≥ ‘Epochs’? ≥ Big crunch or big Ripe?

Now, the reader should notice 2 things, which are quite evident. On one side, the similarity between the largest and smallest scales of physical systems, the atom and the galaxy; on the other the question marks on the big-bang theories, which are themes not so obviously related to the saint Grail of physics – the discovery during my studies of both systems of a way to unify both – the world of charges and masses, hence all the scales of physical systems of the Universe, as they had exactly the same equations in the metrics of the 5th dimension. Indeed charges and masses were clocks of time of the electromagnetic and gravitational scale in 5D metrics, only that the galactic vortex turned 10 up to 40 times slower in those metrics than a charge and were larger in a similar quantity (Sp x Tƒ = K).

And so when I translated the equations of electromagnetism to the jargon of gravitation alas, all the equations matched, those of the electron with the galactic halo, and the black hole radius appeared suddenly as the radius of the Bohr Hydrogen atom…

Thus when I found that the 10 up to 40 relationship between the charge and mass forces (the so-called hierarchy problem), was equivalent to the different of ‘speed of a charge and mass clock’ in 5D metrics – giving birth to an easy unification as time clocks of two scales it was the beginning of a full new field of science, which I called 5D cosmology.

Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. Tƒ: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. Sp: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– Sp=Tƒ: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> Tƒ (Black holes)

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.

Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

 

PHYSICS. BACK TO THE EARTH: THE GENERATOR OF ATOMS AND MATTER

3 physical States: Sp (past-entropy fields/gas)≤ST (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ(future particle-crystal)

Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 16.46.52triple point matter life ages

∆-1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp(Spatial toroid fields)≤ ST (Hyperbolic waves)≤ Tƒ(particles of information)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age/field>ST: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tƒ: old informative, future particle age.

 

In the description of Œ∆-3 , atoms, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: h-quanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules

Spatial symmetry:

∆-4: Light: Field: Sp: Halo ST: Wave ≤ Tƒ: Photon

∆-3: Atom: Sp: Electron ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei

∆-2: Molecule: Sp: External atoms< ST: Electro-Magnetic Bondage ≤ Tƒ: Crystal Center

Time Ages:

∆-4: Sp: Vacuum space ≥ ST: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tƒ: Particle

∆-3: Sp: Plasma≥ ST: Atom ≥Tƒ: Elements Table

∆-2: Sp: Gas ≥ ST: Liquid≥Tƒ: Solid-crystal

In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We an see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same and closes the cycle.

Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:

∑Λ-1: [Sp-Fields≤≥ST-waves≤≥Tƒ-Particles]≈ Plasma: Λ: [Sp-Gas≤ST:Liquid≤≥Tƒ:Crystals]≈Matter: Λ+1: [Sp-Oort Belt≤≥ ST: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]

We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5th dimension, ∆-particle < ∆-1: wave, faster state: motion > Particle-still form.

Let us then consider briefly the meaning of momentum and energy and its conservation laws which ultimately mean the conservation of the 5th dimension. We shall consider two aspects of it: the ternary symmetry of past-fields, present waves and future particles and how the Universe conserves its presents through ‘reproductive motions’, which will finally turn around the whole scaffolding of sciences, as we shall discover that actually the only arrow of time that was NOT organic of the 6 motions found by Aristotle – locomotion is ALSO REPRODUCTIVE, ORGANIC, SO WE LIVE IN A SENTIENT, LIVING UNIVERSE!! which only physicists’ lineal bias and abrahamic ego-trips blind us to.

 Ternary symmetry: Sp: Fields<ST-waves>Tƒ-particles.

Particle physics, the other side of the physics supposedly experienced at CERN – along with cosmology, the replication of the big bang, is a restricted, relatively unimportant science, from the human perspective of our Uo-Plane of existence. But physics in general is not. Physics is constructed with the assumption that mathematics is the only language of the Universe and encodes all the information about it.

Of course it is not. Physical systems, are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal space-time beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them.

Mathematical physics is in that sense only a part of all the properties of physical systems. Bio-logical properties are far more essential to synthesize the meaning of physical systems, the why and reasons of its ‘Maxwellian demons’ (-; all those points-particles, fractal points of view that gauge information, acct-react to the environment and pursuit actions in space time that maximize its function of existence œ (±∆e, i, ∑œ, ∫U).

In pure existential algebra, ¬Æ, we can deduce mathematically departing from a logic function of existence, Œ, in which 5 different space-time actions delivered by each fractal point, in a given plane of the 5th dimension, traces a series of actions, which are ordered into world cycles, that represent a flow of vital space, enclosed into a series of seemingly permanent perpendicular time cycles that guide them.

Existence as a holography of bidimensional functions of temporal information surrounding expansive fields of entropy to produce reproductive waves is a game which can be better expressed in Darwinian biological ways. Atoms in that sense behave in no different form from animal herds and territorial beasts, and human beings for that matter.

What is then a top predator in a given field of physics is the active magnitude with maximal mass or charge or momentum.

Particle physics is divided into groups, families of increasing

The distance-energy or past field of LARGER spatial size of the system, Sp, multiplied by the V=EXi, speed, guided by Tƒ a quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.

Tœs:

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4th is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

Now in physics we can easily consider a generator equation of the 3 states-ages-forms of beings in the 3 scales of its 5th dimension (∆-1: quantum, ∆: Thermodynamic, ∆+1 gravitational scales.

The particle state: ∆-1: charges, ∆-molecules and ∆+1: masses, vortices of time: clocks of information. Tœs.

This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.

They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4th is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

So Einstein, used those non-Euclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.

Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘mass-power’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M= kƒ.

This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation:

E(Sp)<cc>M(Tƒ).

ST: ∆-1: Waves, ∆-liquids and ∆+1 speeds:

Now those Tœs are ‘static, point-particles’ that share information and energy among them, from their relative static points of view, as the Universe has infinite relative frames of reference (this is one of the great findings of physics that still applies to 5D systems: the principle of relativity). It means that Tœs command a territorial region, in which they have an internal structure of 3 sub-parts, but also are in an outer bigger world in which they communicate with their Tœs on the upper ∆+1, equal ∆ and lesser ∆-1 scales, giving origin to a fundamental ‘second postulate’ of ¬æ. It those œ are fractal points (first postulate), called fermions crystals, solids, stars and black holes, they will then communicate ‘bosons, liquid flows, electromagnetic, sound or liquid waves or electronic current or jets of matter between them:

Future-Tƒ<≈Present wave-field≈> Future Tƒ, giving origin to the second component of physical systems. And again in each scale we will recognize a relative present state with similar properties and symmetries in each scale.

So those flows of communication gives origin to the certain modes of ‘present’, reproductive wave-liquid states in each scale. So in essence bosons, waves, liquids, electric currents and jets and streams of cosmic matter and stars reproduced by black holes are in each scale the same wave fields.

What is then the main parameter of the relationship between the Sp, Tƒ and ST elements of each of those scales. Simply the constants of space-time actions that relate in the simplest possible form, those 3 elements the Metric of the 5th dimension: K = E x T.

That is, the constants of Action of Physics, in its 3 scales K (H)= E x T, (quantum field)   K (k) = E x T (Thermodynamic Field); K (M)= E x (µ=1/e).

Those 3 constants of action, the Planck constant, H, the Boltzmann Constant, K, and the mass Constant, M, are the fundamental elements which define the 3 planes of physical systems in the 5th dimension (quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological planes). Thus their translation into the simplex Metric of 5D physics is the first step to build the entire building of Physical sciences, with a comprehensive understandable, isomorphic formalism, which will return physics to the realm of reality and show the pantheist equality between all the systems of the Universe.

Sp: ∆-1: Electromagnetic Fields, ∆ Thermodynamic Gases and ∆+1: accelerated masses (equivalence principle).

All the capacity of waves and particles to exist comes from Fields, the Sp, and lower scale of pure entropic, expansive, accelerated motions.

They are the lower scales of which in the parlance of physics, waves and particles are considered ‘excitations’, in the jargon of T.Œ eusocial evolutions into tighter denser waves of energy and information and even denser particle forms, knots of waves, themselves ‘excitations’ that ‘make emerge’ efficient workable energy and form from the entropic, loose herds of field quanta.

So we talk also of a series of fields from the simpler, smaller to the larger fields of the Universe, of which the fundamental ones are the ‘strong-field, of the internal region of atoms, of minimal size the electroweak field of light waves of galactic size, the thermodynamic field of heat waves of molecular size

So finally we arrive the other way around to the first part that all physical theories study, the simplest fields. Here we observe one fundamental different or rather complementarity of the way classic physical and 5D physics work: we develop reality from the whole and its generator equation downwards studying first the organic structure of the system in time and space, its T.Œ and actions and then going down we study the wave-Exi present systems and finally the Sp-Entropic, accelerated motions of the micro-fields of ∆-1 particles and lineal momentums which rise and give the energy and micro-clocks that the whole will use.

This of course is a matter of choice, made in T.Œ not to bust the balls of scholars but to complement what they have done. Indeed, the human scholarship today studies mainly the upward arrow of social evolution of the 5th dimension –w without even recognizing it is a social evolution. So, and this is what we criticize, describe the upper systems of reality as emerging from the lower systems, but without recognizing the interrelationship symbiosis and existence of an arrow from the upper T.Œ elements through its survival actions that order the lower systems.

So physicists consider particles to be ‘excitations’ of fields hence some kind of secondary ‘thing’ which does not matter as much as the field itself. Biologists consider organisms, ‘constructs’ of Genes without realizing that once the organism is formed, it is the self, which directs the drives of existence of the being, towards energy information, reproduction and social evolution.

By bringing T.Œ, which is composed playing with words of a series of œ-points which play the game of Tao, of Temporal existence, and survival, by bringing Temporal beings, Time space Organic Existential Beings, into the game, and understanding perception by O-minds that gauge information, we complete the description of the Universe. We of course enlighten also the meaning of the lower scales and use the same formula and evident data, but we add, double reality.

All this said, fields do matter. As without them the emerging more complex social scales that interlock with them and create ternary co-existing structures will not exist, so for each plane of existence we must find a past-relative herd of micro-points, which are treated as indistinguishable particles by the wave-particle system, from where it extracts energy and information ordering it.

3 conservation laws: Energy≈ 5th dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe they found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and a lineal motion.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5th dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5th dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E∆-1=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E∆1=1/2 mv2 with the limit E=mc2 for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5th dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c2

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5th dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it.

And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

In that regard, we shall save from the bonfire of vanities and weapons, which is the worldview of anthropomorphic religions and physical sciences only one figure, Mr. Einstein; as he did respect Philosophers of Science – always acknowledging the influence of Mach in his worldview, Mathematicians, using the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry to r=evolve physics; introducing a first version of a Universe built with infinite cyclical times (so he would quip ‘I seem to be the only physicist that understand that there are infinite times in the Universe running at different speeds), even Mr. Leibniz (‘Leibniz is right, but if so we must throw all physics and start to build it from scratch).

Pity, when he got older he yielded to them, since the Bomb, he sponsored with his letter to Roosevelt make him globally famous. So he corrupted and stop having a laugh to Minkowski and the like. Ultimately, Einstein the r=evolutionary of time, of his youth, couldn’t build all physics from scratch. And could not complete the mathematical r=evolution of Non-Euclidean geometry he did start. So we will just do that. Because one thing is for sure. We won’t corrupt. Physicists will never accept us. And we will not build a bigger bomb to get their respect.

Let us leave it like that – in Einstein’s last sentence: ‘Time is what a clock measures; there are infinite of them, and each has a different speed’…

And ad, for that to happen, all clocks of time must be cyclical, closed motions. So they are finite, they break space into pieces, and each time cycle has a different speed because its ‘perimeter’ has a different length. And because they are finite, as Leibniz explained, absolute time is only the sum of all the time cycles of the Universe, put together as in a puzzle that seems a single plane but is made of infinite little pieces.

Space on the other hand is open. It might seem not that important to set the record straight to understand this fundamental quality that differentiates time from space, but it is the key to it all.

Philosophers though realized of the deformation of time and have often called the interpretation of cyclical time by physicists as lineal space, the ‘spatialization of time’.

Physicists like Hawking have quipped back saying ‘we do not understand mathematics’ and that is why we are envious of his concept of time. Let us have a look at that opinion. Now, arguably the two most important mathematicians of the classic age were two philosophers of science, Mr. Descartes who founded Analytic geometry and started modern mathematics, and Mr. Leibniz, who founded calculus – yes, he, not Newton published first the laws of calculus, though Fermat, an amateur Basque scientist, and fellow countryman, seemingly had figure it out all earlier on…

And as it happens, both Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz were the fathers of the modern scientific concept of cyclical time, precisely because they understood mathematics far better than any physicist did. And in those texts we will evolve mathematics, as nobody has since those 2 completing the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean mathematics, needed to define cyclical time and fractal space, since mathematics got stuck 150 years ago, into reforming only the 5th postulate of Geometry, and so now is a contradiction between 4 Euclidean and one non-Euclidean.

So we shall prove, we do know as our predecessors in the study of cyclical time, Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz much more mathematics than physicists do. And that is WHY we reason on terms of cyclical times.

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi of that age, founding fathers of science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, dis grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, said that all what exists was made of open space, which he called ‘res extensa’ and closed, cyclical time, which he called ‘vortices’. Nobody understood him though because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Descartes meanwhile had to make his living selling his mind to ‘artillery masters’, till queen Cristina, the ‘Minerva of the north’, knowing he had a poor health, perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o’clock in the morning.

She also ordered him to write verses to celebrate her role in the Thirty Years’ War and the statutes for a Swedish Academy. While delivering them to the queen at 5:00 AM, he caught pneumonia and died, saying ‘in winter men’s thoughts freeze like the water’. And so his most important discovery along analytic geometry, the nature of the 2 principles in which reality is founded floundered for a century long.

There is here a pattern which will be repeated between philosophers of science sponsors of an organic sentient universe, of cyclical time and fractal space, ending in relative oblivion vs. the military physicists of lineal time and military power that carry the day and we shall see the pattern in the lives of each century masters of space-time studies: Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Boltzmann vs. Darwin, Einstein vs.…

And we will return to that historic understanding of perhaps the biggest blunder of mankind, many times, with examples of the eternal fight for the soul of man and his knowledge of the Universe, between us, the ‘good intelligent guys’ (-: philosophers of science and them, the ‘bad stupid ones’, the ‘physicists’ O-: Pity the sheeple goes always with them.

A fast survey of time in modern physical sciences. Lineal External motions≈changes.

Beyond lineal, Galilean Time in the XX century, physicists widened their comprehension of time, in two separate new senses – that of Einstein’s relativity, and that of quantum physics in the realm of particles:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 08.03.44

In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time of modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.

  Einstein  ‘did know’, when he said: I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right, but if so, we have to rebuild the entire foundations of physical sciences from its beginning… but he didn’t do it. Instead, lineal germans forgot all what he had truly discovered and ‘blocked’ the advance of cyclical time with their lineal 4D space parameter to keep the illusion going.

The classic interpretation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity by Hermann Minkowski, a Lithuanian-German mathematician, it has been clear that physics has to do not with two entities, space and time, taken separately, but with a unitary entity space–time, in which, however, time like and space like directions can be distinguished. The Lorentz transformations, which in special relativity define shifts in velocity perspectives, were shown by Minkowski to be simply rotations of space–time axes.

The Lorentz contraction of moving rods and the time dilatation of moving clocks turns out to be analogous to the fact that different-sized slices of a sausage are obtained by altering the direction of the slice: just as there is still the objective (absolute) sausage, so also Minkowski restores the absolute to relativity in the form of the invariant four-dimensional object, and the invariance (under the Lorentz transformation) of the space–time interval and of certain fundamental physical quantities such as action (which has the dimensions of energy times time, even though neither energy nor time is separately invariant).

This fact is important in 5D physics regarding the metric, E= S x T, when we enter in details on mathematical physics, not so much in other sciences, where the quality of the actions matter more than its equations. It is in that sense important to realize that what is ‘conserved’ in a single plane of space-time, is the ‘quanta of space’ or physical constant, H-constant in the quantum scale, K-Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and c-speed constant in the gravitational scale. The fact that they are measured in 3 different parameters, action (h), entropy (k) and speed (c), will require some understanding of the biased observation of those constants by humans, more proper of the specialized articles on physics.

What matters here is to corroborate some important aspects on 5D:

– The space of each scale is conserved, and in that sense infinite, it does not expand neither varies (no creationist theories of a single space-time continuum).

– Time varies in its frequency (inverse of duration and the true parameter to use to measure cyclical time: T=1/ƒ), but its product with the energy of the system does not vary in a single plane.

– Time speed=information varies and energy flows between scales, but (and this is a law of 5D which obviously is not advanced by Einstein, unaware of the fractal structure of the Universe), for a 3-∆±1 scales of the Universe both are conserved. And this is truly the meaning of the 5D co-invariance. It means that for each closed system, or ‘worldcycle of existence of a being’ between birth and extinction the system lives and dies into a zero-sum its total time and space.

All this are important Correspondences with Einstein’s work expanded to the 5th dimension, which will be mentioned often when studying the key parameters and events and spatial quanta of 5D space-time beings namely their worldcycle between life and death, and its structure and co-existence in 3 synchronizes scales or states (fields-waves and particles).

In essence, because Einstein, worked with a single plane, and lineal time, Minkowski defined (left image), worldlines. In 5D we will define worldcycles, which is what experience sees. And we will define a total zero sum on a worldcycle of life and death, so time is conserved or rather erased in equal zero sums. Because death is an entropic explosion of information into expanded space across 2 entire planes of the 5th dimension, 3 are the planes in which aw worldcycle exist. As we are born in a cellular scale and evolve into organic and social scales but die back to the cellular scale in entropic death (matter dies back into the radiation, minimal particle scale).

What about the concept of lineal time in Relativity, both Galilean and Einsteinian. Here we must warn the reader of the overblown importance given to the concepts of time in physics which are not only restricted by linearity but by the limits of its philosophy of time.

In the widest sense time is ALL forms of change in the Universe and 5D T.Πdoes explain them all. For example the worldcycle of life and death is the key to understand the survival program of the Universe, its ages and horizons of evolution; the 5th dimension and its arrow of time of parts and wholes to explain the evolution of the Universe and the life and social evolution of humanity. And so on.

The confusion of time arrows in physics.

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t understand Feynman, Einstein and their findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time in physics balance each other).

This, Einstein insisted as he obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

Life arrow:       Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp

Death arrow:        Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp + Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ = 0-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents.

In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past-anti-particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.

Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the…

Now this is how we formalize T.Œ, by advancing also the fundamental sciences – geometry, completing the work of Riemann, Einstein and others who study the 5th non-Euclidean postulate – the fact that points hosted multiple parallels, and improving over Aristotelian logic, because reality and the languages that express it are ternary langauges where relative past energies and future information merge into present existence in space:

Past-energy < Present-body/wave > Future-information

Or are sequential in time, past (youth) > mature age > Future 3rd age of information.

So far the logic of man has at best studied the second ‘ORDER’ of the ‘fractal space-time ages-cycles of reality’.

Only Feynman had the insight in physics to give antiparticles a past arrow, as it is the case, and only Einstein had some insight on it when it said that the separation between past, present and future was an illusion, and of course Leibniz, the genius, and the Eastern Taoists… So some did imagine the whole thing but now we are serious we are truly formalizing the Universe in its complexity. And this ternary logic starts by defining the Universal Grammar of all languages.

The question of scales.

This is the Planck action the Boltzmann action and the c2 speed action. At this point it does not matter they are measured in units of angular momentum, entropy and squared speed – again human concepts. We might call them bidimensional ‘quanta of space-time’.

This bidimensional quanta of space-time defines not only the minimal unit, the minimal active ‘cell’ so to speak of each scale that we shall called a Planckton (similar to the unit of biological seas), a Bolt and a Mmm… Mat… for matter, Mas for mass, or Mot, for Motion and the God of death?… Never mind, if in the future anyone cares to develop T.Œ further, they will choose.

Today of course we know even in the world of physics that there are infinite time cycles as Einstein proved, that there are infinite spaces, as quantum physics proved, that there are infinite scales of size as microscopes and macroscopes (telescopes) proved, that there are infinite different speeds of time clocks, which close its cycles from the fastest particles to the largest galaxies, that the largest beings move paradoxically slower than the shortest ones.

And we still have the 6 forms of motion in time, generation, evolution through ages of life and the slower horizons of ‘larger’ species, growth in social numbers of cells or individuals, and diminution, both phenomena related to the evolution of physical and biological systems back and forth (so cyclical particles became cyclical atoms, that became molecules, cells, matter, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and so on), as they dissolve their forms of information in the process of death, and yes, I forgot there is this 6th form of motion, locomotion, of which physicists have provided an enormous detailed account with its formula S = vt ≈ ct.

So we have 3 obvious elements or time realities to be studied:

– Cyclical time changes, which can be grouped in the process generation, evolution and extinction, or worldcycle of life and death .

– Growth in scales of size and diminution, across a ‘5th dimension’ (to respect for routine the so called 4 dimensions of space-time), which has the important property of relating the speed of the worldcycles of beings with their size, such as ‘bigger systems in space have slower time cycles’, both in physical systems (slower rotation of larger forms, according to the laws of vortices in 2 and 3 dimensions, Vo x Ro = K, w2 x R3 =K) and in biological systems (faster metabolic rates of smaller animals) and in social systems (slower life span of social species and civilizations that of individuals and human beings).

A fact that we can resume in the most general formula possible of both parameters: Sp x Tƒ= ∆c (Space Size x Time speed =Constant), that we shall call the Metric of the 5th dimension, where ∆ will be the symbol for each plane of space time, Sp, a plane of space and Tƒ, a cycle of time (the need of both symbols for the 2 states of space and the 2 states of time, soon to be revealed).

And then…. Yes, locomotion.

And as it happens, that the process of generation always starts from a smaller seminal seed or first particle, which grows in size by iteration, and accumulation of clonic forms into a larger size, with slower time rates, back and forth through the changes of ages or evolution and social gathering into larger wholes, to die back into the lower scale, we can in fact put together all the previous time changes into a simple logic equation, the equation of the worldcycle, which in its verbal form, translated into a few logic symbols, œ, for any being or ‘function of existence’, ∆±1 for different planes and growth in the 5th dimension, Ñ for its opposite dissolution of a plane in the moment of death, > for an increase of density of form and < for an increase in size, writes:

Birth ∆-1 -> ∑œ∆-1 ≈ Œ∆ < Sp > (S ≈ T)∆+1 > Tƒ < < Sp ∆-1: Entropic Death

This Logic Equation is the equation of a worldcycle that summarizes the 5 motions in time, birth and generation by iterative reproduction, evolution through 3 ages or horizons, Sp, the age of spatial energetic motion or youth, s=T, the age of balance between energy and information when the system reaches its adult reproductive age, and Tƒ, the age of cyclical temporal information or old age, when the lineal motions exhaust or fall into a time vortex, followed by a reversal in the process of growth of information that explodes back into space and entropy, called death.

Now the Philosopher of science has been always interested in describing this worldcycle. And once we have formalized we will use it to describe all what exists and all its process with this 5Dimensional metric. The physicist has converted it into a worldline in a single space-time continuum, in the Minkowski’s 4Dimensional metric, which is just a ‘small view’ of this much larger worldview.

In that sense, I have always seen my work as the culmination of the search for T.Πof which T.O.E. is just a mere footnote.

 

∆¡>|2|: Physical systems

The study of the ‘action instructions’ or codes that make species perform those åctions, its periodicity and triggers (often defined externally by a volume of the e,i specific substance of the being) becomes then also an important part of this analysis.

For example, atomic systems perform third åctions by obeying the mathematical, Quantum codes of 4 numbers; Biological systems write their instructions in Genetic codes of 4 letters; instinctive behavior codes those åctions in 4 drives of life existence; the 4 dimensions of light space-time express those åctions in photons; 4 Maxwell equations develop them for electromagnetic currents…

Examples of the 4 codes of åctions.n clocks

How do actions reflect in the scientific languages. In physical sciences scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 3 space-time symmetries, Spe<STœ>Tiƒ, which reflect the space-time cycles of species. Those cyclical space-time actions are thus defined by Equations, which translate the ¬Æ symmetries of space-time into the jargon of mathematical physics.

But the ternary symmetry has 3 elements. So we must write it on a dual form, of the type Spe x Tif = STœ, Past x Future = Conserved Present, to establish the homology between the Generator, which is a logic development, and the equations of physics which are dual.

Then, as the graph shows, we must obviously define for each physical scale, what is the Tiƒ parameter of time frequeuncy (frequency, in the quantum scale of waves, temperature in the thermodynamic scale and speed in the gravitational scale); what is the spatial ‘unit’ or constant step of each scale (h-planck, for the quantum electromagnetic scale, k-boltzmann in the thermodynamic scale and m in the gravitational scale); and finally translate the space-time conserved quantity for each ∆-constant system, which will be, Ei (energy and information, both measure with the mathematical concept of Energy), when considered the whole, or momentum, when considered a ‘step’ of a cyclical, closed ‘conserved energy path’.

So to define cyclical space-time actions in physics, we work normally with a general equation of the form: Tiƒ (ƒ, T, v motion parameter) x Spe (h, k, m space quanta) = Ei (Energy function) or p (momentum).

And finally we need to define the element that ‘acts’, and the world in which it ‘acts’ and the scale of the Universe from where it ‘extracts’ its bits of information, bites of energy, seeds of reproduction etc.

So we must consider the active fractal point, Å which will be either a particle, atom, or matter state, cosmic body or dark matter form (strangelet, black hole), and then describe with equations that will usually contain the motion-time parameter, the space-quanta parameter and the energy function.

Then we can define some basic equation of physics for each action of existence, and start the fascinating though long process of translating each equation of physics to the isomorphic action it represents for the point of view that is at the center of each action.

So functions that represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:

∆-3: Light åctions.

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons:image030

In the graph, we have written the 3 dimensions of time, past, slow energy and future, fast information with the human time-clock speed as our relative present, point of view. Since simpler scales are causally in the past; as an entity is created literally by informing, molding with higher ∆+1 networks, simpler scales ‘cell by cell’. When a light wave moves, it does not ‘displace’ but reproduces its wave motions, ‘warping’ simpler gravitational 1D string lines, by a height factor of –ct (Relativity). Motion is really reproduction of information on a simpler ∆-1 scale. Thus we describe the 3 Time Dimensions of ‘social evolution’ of light across 3 ∆-scales as:

– ∑: Color is the 4th ‘social dimension’ of light, made by herding together multiple frequencies of light into a photon, its present, simultaneous space dimension. As space from the perspective of time dimensions is a present ‘slice’ of the total time flow – the 4th dimension of time. While inversely the Present, simultaneous measures of Time, are in Relativity the 4th dimension of space. Yet we reach a sounder description separating those 3+3 spacetime dimensions, by using multiple time speeds instead of a single 4D clock.

+i: Fractal electrons are Light’s ∆+1 dimension of future network evolution.

-i: The gravitational ∆-1 scale in which it feeds is its relative, to which it returns after ‘dying’, red-shifting and expanding its length-speed between galaxies (z>c).

Then as light warps into more informative, smaller beings (Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp), first electrons, then molecular orbitals and so on, each new ‘scale’ of light space-time requires the previous scales to be born. Thus causally simpler scales are in the past. When your ∆-neurons, create your ∏-whole, they are in the past, requiring an action-bit of time to synchronize and emerge as an ∆+1 whole into the future. That’s why the subconscious rules, and the ‘ego’ merely observes with its electric whole brain waves; or the molecular orbital appears ‘after’ the atomic ones dissolve into the whole.

Further on, complex ∆+∆ systems move slower, as they draw more information in a single space-point. A light beam of pure ¥-space informs only a gravitational line so it reaches the maximal c-speed of our spacetime membrane. But there is another parallel Universe of gravitational scales, of Sp-speed and information-order, made of dark, gravitational energy, quark matter and quark, boson stars (black holes), which are accelerating vortices of w>C and T the c-event horizon. And since we ‘don’t see’ gravitational information, its relative motion-speed is ∞, non-local.

4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field or rather its structure as a system with an external membrane, the magnetic field, an internal point of view, the charge, and the exchanges of energy and information between both poles and the external world (the content of its actions).maxwells-equations4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons:qnumbers

Its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number.

In that regard, as in the case of energy we have to differentiate the concept of T.Œ’s actions and Action in physics.

Motion, in physics, may be described from at least two points of view: the close-up view and the panoramic view. The close-up view involves an instant-by-instant charting of the behaviour of an object. The panoramic view, on the other hand, reveals not only a complete picture of the actual behaviour of an object but also all the possible routes of development connecting an initial situation with a final situation. From the panoramic view, each route between the two situations is characterized by a specific numerical quantity called its action. Action may be thought of as twice the average kinetic energy of the system multiplied by the time interval between the initial and final position under study or, again, as the average momentum of the system multiplied by the length of the path between the initial and final positions.

The value of the action for any actual motion of a system between two configurations is always a minimum or a maximum. In most instances, the behaviour of the system follows the path of minimum, or least, action. In an optical system, such as a microscope, light travels along the path of least action as it undergoes bending in the lenses. For light, action is proportional to the time of travel, so that the light travels the path that takes the least time.

With the beginning of quantum theory (1900), the concept of action took on a new importance. In describing the behaviour of molecular or atomic particles, one had to invoke a previously unsuspected restriction. Only those states of motion are possible in which actions are whole-number multiples of a certain very small number, known as Planck’s constant, named for the German scientist Max Planck, who first proposed a discrete, or quantized, behaviour for objects of subatomic dimensions. Thus Planck’s constant is the natural unit, or quantum, of action. But in T.œ, h, is the quanta of space of the ∆-1 scale, and so it appears in the different vital, a,e,i,o,u actions of the entity. The mathematical concept of action in physics, e x i thus is of little use in t.œ’s description of actions, but of course h-planck as the minimal quanta of space or ‘Planckton’ is essential to Physical systems.

Type of actions across ∆-scale.

All this said the proper way to understand the function of existence, e x i |s=t, we need to understand some basic notions and type of actions, and to that aim we use a simple mnemonic rule, classifying them within the vowels of the alphabet, as a-ccelerations (pure entropic motions), e-nergy feedings, i-nformative actions, o-rganic reproduction (offspring) and finally U-niversals creation (creation of wholes from individual parts)

This fifth set of ‘actions’ is what all supœrganisms, automatically, consciously or through some other species, as enzymes of its reproduction, is what all beings do.

5 DIMENSIONAL DUST OF SPACE TIME, ‘DO EXIST’ by acting, exchanging energy and information along ∆º±1 scales.

∆º exi±st as a function of actions.

The Universe is a game of ‘Doers’, ∆º minds that do observe the Universe through its attached body of energy, a flow of time, ∆-1≤∆+1 and information ∆+1≥∆-1, balanced constantly on an inner and outer, ∆- and ∆+ world and Universe.

If we define the following motions of time:

Energy: ∆-1>∆º

Information: ∆+1>∆º

Entropy: Death into Space: ∆+1<<∆-1

Time Singularity; emerging seed: ∆-1<<∆+1

We define in that sense, the inner world, ∆º-i vs. the outer world ∆º+i as the essential first division of the existential function, which can then be mathematised as a cycle or membrane that closes an inner and outer world, and do exist by letting energy and information, e x i transit between its inner and outer world of existence.

This is the game, as existential functions we are a membrane with an angular momentum, given by its inner density and outer motion of the past-future related topologies of space – we are the membrane of an open ball, communicating with the Universe, were are pis, ∑ πis of existence; fluid ensembles of time cycles knotted into a crystal mind, a point of complexity only perceived in full from its still mind mirror of the Universe:

∆º 

In the graph bosonic minds vs. spatial fermions, establish a first general evolution across ∆ (bosons) or ST, fermions, which therefore becomes an expanded polar flow, as OPPOSED TO HE HIERARCHICAL SINGLE ANTI-DEATH ARROW OF BEINGS IN A BOSONIC STATE WHICH TRY CONSTANTLY TO INCREASE ∆, not to die as a §ocial knøt.

IN THE GRAPH we observe the essential s±t function with two possible outcomes which will be defined by the interaction of those two arguments.

Abstract Regardless of the dogmas of modern science, which accepts only mathematics as the language of God (Galileo, Hilbert,etc), and gives anthropomorphic qualities (perception≈informative properties, life-vital-biological≈survival properties) only to human beings and the like, hiding those clear ‘ego-trips’ of human superiority with elaborated dogmas, easily believed (as the ego is above knowledge), from religion to science, reality objectively speaking makes us equal to all other beings, made of the same substances and behaviours, only different in quality not in quantity.

Thus the Universe and all its parts do have sentient=apperceptive, informative capacities, ruled by an ∆º point-mind or singularity of information, which controls with different languages a  body of energy and information, e x i , which exchanges energy and information with an external upper and lower, scale of space-time, ±St. So of the many ways we write the logic generator of space-time beings, one of my favourites is the ‘function of existence’:

∆º (mind- particle/head exchanging…) = e x i (energy and information with its body-wave over) ± st (an outer world and inner world of space-time in which the organism exists)

To exist, ∆º=exi±st, exi=st¡ence are similar acronyms we use often in this blog, even if the use of ‘words’ given the one-dimensional dogmatic way in which humans perceive reality won’t be easily accepted. But this blog does not follow the ‘paradigm of dogma, truth and measure’, which passes today as science, but the concept of a fractal, homologic, repetitive Universe, where given the simplicity of its fundamental principles, the beauty is in the homologic, metaphoric repetition of similar patterns in all beings. And of those patterns the most important is the ‘actions’ of survival that systems display to ‘exist’, that is the needed constant actions of exchange of energy and information, absorbtion of entropy-motion and emission of repetitive patterns of information, to make the system survive beyond death.

Those actions is the theme of this post – the program of existence, all systems follow in order to survive, which we resume in the previous acronym, and in a mnemonic 5 vowel system of action: entropy motions or ‘A-celerations’, e-nergy feeding, i-formative reproduction and communication, o-ffspring (reproduction) and  social evolution from individual into Universals. To exist, thus is to perceive and gauge information about energy sources where to feed or reproduce, and move towards those sources, often with similar close beings, in herds and social organisms, stronger than the individual.

The function or program of existence is thus a program of survival which unifies all systems, not only in its ternary forms in space, ages in time and scales of co-existence, but in the way they behave to continue that existence. What humans bring to the table as special is not perception, perhaps self-consciousness of being apperceptive species, due to the self-reflection of the verbal language. But as Leibniz put it, not all humans are truly conscious of being, neither things should be so unconscious of existence. So he coined the term apperception, which we often use here as the automatic, vegetative or reflective perception and gauging of information needed to survive that all systems perform.

∆<|3|. BIOLOGIC SYSTEMS

4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule.

4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:

image050

And 4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.

Now, the study of the ‘Program of Existence’ is an enormously extended field, and so we must consider for the reader not to loose its ‘mind’ (-; on such vast field, which encompasses all the åctions and events of the Universe, only a few generic elements in ∆ST, which are latter studied in detail for each species, as in the aforementioned cases of the 4 quantum numbers. 4 genetic letters, 4 biological drives and 4 Maxwell equations.

Thus, immediately the reader would realize that according to the duality between ‘the thoughts of God’ (∆ST) and its details (all the different sciences) 2 are the main sub-disciplines of this field of knowledge are:

– The study of the 4 drives of existence for each species of the Universe. This should be realized in each science, as an introductory course that embeds the science in ∆ST

– The study of the interåctions, synchronicities, order and relationship between the 4 drives and its generic laws for all systems. This second field is the purpose of this post.

Thus for all said, it is quite evident that along the study of the topologies in space and ages in time, the study of the åctions is the 3rd most important isomorphism of the universe.

III. BIOLOGY: ENTROPY VS. INFORMATION

Evolution of Information vs. Entropic death.

‘The Universe is dying’ Clausius on his hyperbolic expansion of the Sp-arrow of ideal gases to the whole cosmos and beyond.

‘The species with more efficient (in)form(ation) reproduces in larger numbers and survives’ Darwin explaining the vital program of all ST-beings.

So while physics is a fascinating field to advance with T.Œ, it should be obvious to the reader that as all scales of reality are self-similar, and there are uncertainty of perception in physical scales. Thus what truly should matter to mankind is the knowledge of the human, biological and social scales and its symmetries of space, anti symmetries of time ages, and asymmetries of 5D social evolution:

Biological Systems:

∆-1(cellular scale)> ∆: Organic scale> ∆+1: Ecosystemic scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp (Spatial toroid limbs)≤ ST (Hyperbolic bodies)≤ Tƒ(heads of information)≈

Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, reproductive age > Tƒ: old informative, future age.

In the description of Œ∆-3, life, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: cell<∆: Multicellular Organism <∆+1: Ecosystem

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Cell: Sp: Protein Membrane <: ST: Cytoplasm ≤ Tƒ: DNA nuclei

∆o: Organism: Sp: Skin, limbs ≤ ST: Body organs ≤ Tƒ: Head

∆+1: Ecosystem: Sp: Gaia < ST: Plants and Territories ≤ Tƒ: Animal Life

Time Ages:

∆-1: Sp: Carbohydrate soup ≥ ST: RNA, Protista age ≥ Tƒ: Eukaryote, DNA Age

∆o: Sp: Plants ≥ ST: Cambric explosion>Sea-life ≥Tƒ: Reptiles>Mammals

∆+1: Sp: Sea Age ≥ ST: Transitional Age (animal sea life, Earth’s plants) ≥Tƒ: Animal Land Ecosystems.

 

∆≈1,2: HUMAN SYSTEMS.

image002

What do 5D points  of space and time do? to exist as points with volume, with 3 organic parts: To, the cyclical sphere, mind-mapping which directs a body-wave that iterates the system along a path of a field of space-time by exchanging energy and information in favorable conditions for its system So beings can be described formally as:

To (heads-particles)< Exi(body wave) ≈ ST: space-time field/limbs that move the system.

And consider that they are a ‘function of existence’, whose purpose is To< Exi≈st, by performing a series of actions of exchange of energy and information, with its environment, with the aim of growing and multiplying, reproduce and evolve into new planes of space-time.

In the graph, we see the function of existence of man as a ternary organism of space-time.

How often a system implement the cyclical space-time actions it needs? Simply.

They are discontinuous, modular cycles, as actions absorb or emit energy and information when the system spends it. so actions have time rhythms, and the system varies between them. We eat, perceive, fuc* and socialise not simultaneously. So actions are the origin of the discontinuous ‘beats’ of existence. A fuc* a day for young married couple, a fuc• a year for an animal in spring – those are different beats. We eat all days, we see each second. The order, rhythms, synchronicities, interdependence, etc, of actions are thus another huge field studied in our post on synchronous actions.

Another element thus becomes the way in which a mind through memorial logic circuits, stored mathematically or genetically, or verbally (physical, biological social systems) or in any other language of the mind performs its actions; and the ‘triggers’ of the different parts of the being that start up an action rhythm (hunger: ∆e, lust: ∆œ, curiosity: ∆i, etc. in man).

In the graph, the human ∆ºst being composed of Space, Time, ∆-scales and ºminds that perceive the whole enact the will≈algorithm of survival, immanent and automatic (as those systems that did not impose this will of survival, and its 5 actions became extinct).

HUMAN ACTIONS

Above we have shown it integrated across the time duration of a human world cycle, below we develop it for a man, in terms of its, 3 ‘varieties’ of bidimensional space, the Se, digestive, energetic system, the Tƒ, cyclical, informative head and the TS iterative, time space blood/reproductive organs, and its evolution through the 3 ages of time, the Te, young, entropic age, the Tƒ adult iterative, reproductive age, and the Tƒ, old, informative age:

Te<Tƒ>Tƒ.

In terms of space it develops as Se, the lineal, entropic, expansive form, Si, the hyperbolic for and Tƒ, the spherical form.

Thus we have a simple code to explain it all, the æ,e,ï,œ,û system of space-time dimensions and events. The playful understanding of those simplest elements of reality through the manipulation of those symbol with the function of existence, its integrands in space and derives in time, is the ultimate game of reality that we can then apply to each species.

 

 

The 5 åctions in humans and other species.

1107 1112 1117c

In the graph the systems of humans to develop its actions, which are the senses, openings to the 3 digestive: energetic, blood: reproductive and brain: informative main systems (divided by the ternary principle in 3 more subsystems) that define the human being and its ‘energetic’, ‘informative’ and reproductive actions, below the social actions mediated by memes, most often of eusocial love religions, today translated into laws of equality, fraternity and solidarity. As we are also code by memetic and genetic systems of actions.

10 human scales

There is A 5D deeper understanding in philosophical terms on the manner in which form and motion transcends through scales to be perceived by the human being, and why we only perceive those scales – namely because they are the ones we act upon. So we can build a human being as the sum of all those åctions across all its scales we perceive, from where an entire understanding of the program of existence of man, our will and what is ‘life and existence’ for us can be deduced.

This connects with the order of those åctions as a pyramid of ‘desires’, we do have a Maslow-like pyramid of åctions which emerge and require the previous one: to perceive we must move towards the perceived system, to feed we must perceive the food and move to it, to reproduce we need enough energy and genetic information in our body. And obviously to evolve socially we must reproduce previously.

And since creation of social, organic networks, requires all other åctions, it is the summit of the ‘program’ of the ‘biological’ Universe that all its species follow.

In the graph that opens this  we see the concept of åctions applied to all systems. It is a decade old graph, when I omitted a-motions, the lowest action and included generations, an action above the ∆+1 scale, mixture of the reproductive and social actions.

Yet since now I consider ∆+1 generations, as part of Time Theory (evolution in ∆+1 planes), and have changed my consideration of ∆-4 accelerations as part of Space theory, we could exchange those åctions. i am not doing so much corrections for laziness and also to show the ‘continuity’ of the whole Universe.

The choice though comes from the philosophical considerations:

‘An action requires a conscious will by the individual 0-point of the system which performs it’.

In that regard, the choice is ambivalent, but motion seems to be more conscious than the passing of multiple generations, which beyond reproduction is not an individual action. Of course, ∆ST is a perfect structured Universal order created not by humans, but by Reality and my perception of it has improved with time. Still the graph is a nice portrait of what åctions are in multiple planes of existence, performed by many ∆-species.

 

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: