MINDS AND LANGUAGES
‘Gods are unmovable, the primary cause which moves the energy of its vital space’. ‘We are all Gods.’ Aristotle on the mind.
‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Leibniz, on the Monad, mind of space-time.
‘Space is motion relative to a frame of reference.‘ Einstein on the Non-Euclidean point of space-time.
In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.
Soonly organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.
The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet networks are more powerful and survive.
How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:
In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.
In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time.
So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.
In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.
SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:
The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.
So the graph shows that back and forth to adequate to how REALITY IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:
You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…
THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.
So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:
Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.
So THE QUESTION HERE IS WHICH LANGUAGES ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT OF THE UNIVERSE? BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THERE WILL BE A PROCESS OF SELECTION OF SPECIES ACCORDING TO THE QUALITY OF ITS LANGUAGES:
ALL THIS said it is obvious that to survive the mind must care for itself, and for its program of survival with its chains of actions, from Informative gauging, to A-ccelerated motions to e-nergy feeding… So THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A->B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a co-existing super organism of time-space.
Where both views meet though is where the most interesting truth and dominant arrow of the Universe – reproduction happens. So indeed, we can talk in terms of the absolute arrow of time, the whole as the future, the mind as the desegregated part and the present, reproductive merge between both as its present state. And so really we talk of the non-Æ logic of the network and its games of social love, of the @ logic of the single mind, and the Dual logic of reproduction.
In terms of numbers, 1 is the mind, 2 is the couple, 3 is the network, in terms of Postulates of Non-Euclidean topology 1 is the point, 2 is the wave, 3 is the network-plane. No more is needed. In terms of symmetry, the most profound logic expression, we use the 3 suits of decks: ♣=♠+♦+♠
The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.
The mind as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present ego-selfie stage. But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @-mind will leave way to the non-Æ logic of the group.
The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence.
The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.
Let us now blow up your ‘physicist’s’ mind introducing once we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discover their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein.
The Galilean paradoxes: Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.
In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):
The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.
When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:
Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths. The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.
There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.
It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality: - The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’). - And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.
Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy. We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms. And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:
And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).
Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances. The Paradox of Galileo.
The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.
Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’—motions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.
And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.
The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.
Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’
The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:
All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…
The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.
So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’
Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.
In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:
– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).
– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.
In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining THE ESSENTIAL DUALITIES OF FREEDOM AND ORDER. So topology becomes metaphysics.
The 3 philosophies of the Universe: creationist languages vs. space-time substances.
The Universe and all its beings are made of fractal space-time, its scales and 3 arrows-topologies-ages. But this philosophy of science that connects with the realists and the asian traditions is ignored by the anthropomorphic ego-trips of the western man.
So likely only when Chinese/Indian cultures come to dominate the evolution of science, this huge upgrading on philosophy of science will be considered, because reason cannot fight ‘beliefs’ and ego-trips of the childish western frame of mind:
PHILOSOPHY OF THE MIND AS A FINITESIMAL WORLD: ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY
The creationist philosophies of the humind (ab. human mind) deny the existence of any other linguistic minds in the Universe.
This is an ego-trips based in the ‘ego paradox’ (every mind measures the Universe from its distorted self-centred point of view, confusing its infinitesimal still language-mapping of the Universe with the infinite whole: O-mind x ∞ Universe = constant worlds.
SO EVEN BEFORE we start up the explanation of all the four elements of reality, @-minds, $pace, ðime, ∆§cales, we shall debunk the subjective non-scientific ego of the humind, which divides itself into 50% of verbal religious creationists, who think GOD chose man to speak his ‘verbal language’, and mathematical creationists, who think God chose man to spoke with digital numbers:
BUT man will NEVER understand the first principles of the Universe and its ultimate substances, if it does NOT understand the paradox of the ego, and the structure of all topological ∞ minds of the Universe.
In the graph a brief resume of the ‘magic postulates’ that permeate the subconscious collective of western scientists, disputing between the ego-trips of mathematical physics that believes equations create reality (cause of so many theoretical errors from the entropic big-bang, hauling from a simple lineal V=hod ‘God-LIKE equation’ to the evaporation of black holes), vs. the ego-trips of previous verbal ‘scientists’ who thought god spoke with specific languages, arab or hebrew, maybe latter learning ‘Latin’.
In the graph the masters of mathematical and verbal creationism, disputing their ‘primacy’ as speakers of the language of god – notice how Mr. Dirac has a laugh to verbal creationists and its jumble-false God – a product of human imagination – but then affirms shamelessly that God actually does exist, only that he talks, ‘i
hϒ ∂µ ψ = mcψ’ (Dirac equation) and alas particles are born. Reality is a bit more complex and difficult to ‘crack’ as we must start as Einstein wanted with the realist fact that the ultimate substances are not languages, neither personal gods but the impersonal yin-yang, time-space game that creates all the relational space-time organisms of the Universe.
We see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).
And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:
Since, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.
But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.
So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.
Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiple the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.
‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: iinflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d.
So opposing those ‘ego-trips’ there is scientific realism, which this blog will further evolve (Aristotle, Leibniz and Einstein beings its most outstanding AUTHORS), and reasons that reality must be made of the ultimate substances we observe IN reality, which are NOT phonemes and numbers, nowhere to be seen IN REALITY but space and time, and hence by evolving our concepts of vital spaces and time durations, we shall be able to extract properties common to all beings, even though they will be partially distorted by the mind-mirrors (verbal time logic and spatial mathematics) we human use to describe them.
So the key to increase our understanding of reality IS first to understand space and time and its properties, THEN, evolve our logic of verbal time and our topology of spatial mathematics to match those properties and focus better our mirror, and finally, to apply the improved mathematical-verbal logic mirrors to create organic better models of all sciences that happen in time and space, interpreting better the equations of sciences and solve with those models and improved mirrors the data we gather about reality, on which present science clearly excels (but drags behind problems of creationism and lack of understanding and evolution of mathematics).
In the transition from the age of human dominance to the age of computer dominance as the mind making science, which today increasingly is just a process of feeding data into computer models without any search for the whys and principles that unify reality, the earlier founding fathers of physics and economics mixed both creationist theories. So biblical fetish go(l)d religions became classic economics where money, a digital language of information substituted verbal laws in the ruling of western societies, and Kepler like Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him the laws of gravitation felt themselves equal to God, their chosen digital masters. And so when Newton died, Pope told us: And God created Newton and light was born.
It is not then surprising that the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.
MULTIPLE MINDS IN A SINGLE UNIVERSE: UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR
And yet while mind-worlds are many, there is only one Universe. So it is the Universe and its fundamental elements, vital space and informative time, and its combinations the ultimate reality from where all languages-mirrors extract its properties. For example, we shall soon find that all languages have a ternary structure that mirrors the Universe of space-time and its combinations. If we restrict this simplified example of the ‘universal grammar’ of all languages mirrors to the 3 more important languages of man, logic words, visual images and mathematical equations we write always 3 elements that mirror the 3 elements of the Universe:
Real systems: time-information system (particle-head) < space-time action (wave-body) > space-energy system (limb-field)
Words: Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (energy of the subject)
Images: Blue (informative color) < Green-yellow (combination) > Red (energy colour)
Algebra: F (x): a time-informative function < operandi (combinations) > G (y): an energy-space function
Now, what religious verbal or mathematical people state is that the human language, shared by ‘God’, the mind of the Universe comes first, in an ego-trip of truly cosmic proportions that plague both, the religious and scientific discourse.
the opposite is truth, the magic and power of languages resides precisely in its capacity to mirror reality to the point humans so often confuse language and reality. Yet there is an even deeper truth we shall consider in the analysis of languages that create reality in a Cartesian-Leibnizian way by mapping the Universe into a world’s monad, which then acts on reality trying to shape it into the form of the ego-mind, who confuses that mapping with the universe, and feels hence its mind infinite. Languages, minds and reality thus interact as monads perceive, map and then act trying to transform the world into their ego-reflection.
And this gives also a biological sense to languages, which cater to the needs and forms of the egos of the species that speak those languages.
Now, when we have a perspective on the mathematical language (obviously most readers of this blog will be scientists, so we save ourselves the needed explanations about why a goalkeeper of the bronze age did not see the mind of god when a bush burning in the desert seemed to talk to them), we shall consider the ‘why’ of that fractal structure.
What is the purpose or function of a fractal structure and its mathematical description, called a fractal generator equation, (which for the Universe will be in its simplest form, a feedback equation with 2 terms lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, Sp<≈>tƒ, and we shall return to that).
Obviously because fractal co-exist in several scales and organise in complex connected network systems and constantly reproduce their form… ‘reproduction’, ‘iteration’, ‘generation’, ‘creation of new forms and combinations of form and motion, time cycles and lineal kinetic energies, you name it… the very essence of life.
RECAP. We call a mind, •, the ‘whole’, aware of a system, and its will of survival – the most vital, dynamic, perceptive truth of a system, which exists as a whole because there is central point of view that organises all the parts of the system into a simultaneous space-time organism.
The languages that reduce Universe to still, ternary worlds.
Thus what is real is the duality of motions, infinite cyclical and lineal motions, which are used by different minds to replicate reality into still minds that map part of those motions to create different worlds.
For example, Computers use O and | to create models of the Universe.
Humans use words also in a ternary symmetry, where the point is the 0-subject, the energy of the point the |-object, over which it enacts a verbal action. So when we say ‘I eat bread’, ‘I’ is the point, ‘bread’ the object of vital space, and ‘eat’ the feeding implosive action. This allowed linguistics to create the Universal Grammar of all languages:
Subject (0-point) < Verb (action: O x |) > |-Object (Energy of the subject).
On the other hand visual languages are also ternary in colors and forms. So the eyes use lines and cycles to create ‘conic curves’, which are all the curves that exist in Euclidean Geometry and so on.
So we can now extend our definition of reality to include its 3rd elements, which conform a word, whose infinite sum creates the Universe:
A Constant, Dynamic World is born of the interaction of both formal motions, vital spaces, enclosed by times connected by a mind that measures them: Ø”
The Universe is a puzzle sum of ∞ such Worlds:
U= ∑ Ø x ∞ = C’
This is what Descartes explained to the (Human) World, sum of all human minds.
We were all, so to speak, thoughts of God, the Mind of the Universe, understood as the underlying language with the common ‘isomorphic laws’ shared in the construction of all those ‘virtual worlds’, including the human world, since you are not watching the Universe, but the electronic image, your eyes and brain constructs with rods of space, called ‘light-speed’, and cycles of time, called ‘h-quanta’, pieces of lineal and angular momentum that build up the puzzle of your mind.
Descartes vs. Galileo: Knowledge vs. power.
But nobody understood among physicists, because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him and his family, dedicated to manufacture ‘military instruments’, among them the famous ‘spy-glasses’, today called telescopes that allowed the Venetian navy to see on advance the enemy fleet, one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.
Now, a pause. Let us be clear enough, philosophers of science love physics, how couldn’t be otherwise.
Physics is the Universe in its entire description through its 6 motions of time, in its whole and its parts, with all the properties, organic, mathematical≈mental and inorganic, derived from those 6 motions, even if we are aware of the shortcomings of lineal physicists, with its obsession for locomotions and the ego-trips of their human mind, so often as the case of Kepler, Newton and the authors of the big-bang ‘polluted’ by the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic, anthropomorphic religions.
Descartes was also a physicist, besides a mathematician, and a philosopher. It is though important to distinguish between ‘physics’, the universe in its full description, which we shall call as part of T.Œ, Astrœ-physics (-; and ‘physicists’, the lineal point of view of the world of artillery masters and Abrahamic Believers – which IS culture not science, as it reduces physics to locomotion.
We shall therefore study here as a philosopher of science, in the full tradition of the word, astrœ-physics and if this post is found in the larger web on the full T.Œ, all other sciences with the 6 motions.
This said it is obvious that today the philosopher of science has no dictum, and his wider view is ignored. Moreover, as the physicist bullied its limited view with artillery masters, and the parallel inquisitions of Abrahamic religions and anthropomorphic beliefs kept imposing its lineal vision of Nature over that of Darwin and Evolution, the philosopher of science reduced its inquire to what today we study in philosophy of science – the scientific method, which is ONLY the first step of T.Œ.
We thus regain with our work, the true purpose of philosophy of science, which was carried about by Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Darwin and Hegel (and its disciples in social sciences, Marx, Kondratieff, Spengler, and finally the practitioners of systems sciences and theory of information, albeit poisoned by the lineal concepts of Physics – Shannon’s definition of information as lineal messages, etc.)
Unfortunately the limits of inquiring only lineal time motions to explain the meaning of it all, amounts to a constant deformation of reality similar to that of the Abrahamic cults or the Ptolemaic use of the Earth as the enter of the Universe.
Yet those limits are today ignored, by the imposition mainly through the power of technology and the propaganda of those who create machines and weapons as the ‘seers’ of time (the old definition of Augustine of ‘God’) of a reductionist view of lineal motion as all what is worth to know about times.
So of course, it is necessary to make also ethic statements on the worldly profession of physicists –to make weapons of lineal energetic motions – to account for many of its theories of time – in fact all of them, Galilean’s artillery motions; Clausius, entropic, steam-machine motions and Gamow’s, big bomb bang theory of the Universe. This is a topic, but topics exist because they carry truths, and they endure when censorship of their truths oblige them to become topics.
The reduction of the 6 motions of time to a single external translation, where time merely is used to study the change in the speed and position in space of a being in lineal fashion is NOT a truth of Nature, but a truth of artillery masters, which once formalized became a canonical formula that excluded all other time formulae.
So this locomotion, described merely with a single mathematical formula by Galileo, V=S/T, converts Time in a parameter of space, S=vt, or in Einstein’s-Minkowski’s version, S=ct. This means that as ‘things that are compared must have the same dimension and form’, Time must acquired the fundamental property of space, which is to be a lineal, open extension. And by reason of this fictitious linearity of time, to be converted into a perfect line which is an Euclidean parallel extended to infinity.
The 6 motions of times thus became a single mode of change, their cyclical clock-like form, a lineal parallel, the finite duration, an infinite lineal duration that ‘walks’ along an infinite space line. And both written in an abstract Cartesian single plane of reference, which in paper seems to extend to infinity and be unique, became the absurd concept of an infinite space-time continuum, that only exists in the imagination and the paper in which the model was drawn.
Precisions over the mathematical concepts of form ≈ information
Now it must be stressed to give enough mathematical rigor and qualitative accuracy to this blog that information is similar to Temporal Form, as it is carried by time clocks.
Further on information is proportional to the frequency of those time clocks in its volume. And the message of the information is carried in the form of the waves or fixed form we perceive. But temporal form is NOT the same mathematical concept that what Shannon and other ‘humans’ defined as information. Since for humans information is in-form-ation, form-in-action, that is, form which is communicated and perceived by a human receptor, and so it is carried normally by waves, that add a lineal component of spatial speed, or motion to the pure temporal form of the clocks of time.
Duality of form and rotary motion, and the sciences that use those parameters.
The closest mathematical concept to Time forms would be ω, angular frequency or rotatory motion for physical systems; and for all other systems, where the form is more important than the frequency, dimensional form is the key element.
Now the duality between ‘form’ vs. ‘rotary motion’ as the measure of Tƒ, also must be understood in terms of planes of space-time. Astrophysical systems are described with ‘rotary motions’. Biological and sociological systems are better described with ‘the qualitative form’ of the time cycles. Why?
The ‘exact, precise measure of the frequency as the only ‘parameter’ studied about a time cycle is only ‘more’ important in far away planes of space-time submitted to uncertainty of perception, given their far away distance in ‘its plane of existence’. Since we observe only its speed but hardly its form. And this is the case of astrophysical objects, in which Heisenberg uncertainty and dark energy/matter obscures perception of form.
Since minds, and you must always understand that the mind is the central element of perception and knowledge, perceive first motion (so insect eyes see only motions) and then form. But form is more important, contrary to belief that motion in the coding of information, as Proteins show. Dimensional Form and rotary motion are thus 2 parameters, which differentiate how closer sciences perceive Tƒ, and astrophysical, far away ST-planes see it.
Now the brain stops and eliminates motion of closer things to see without blur form. The brain has limited perception in its infinitesimal point so it sees only a ‘bit’ of all the information of a system, and tends to fix information into form, eliminating motion and mapping the whole infinite Universe in its zero point, which gives us its equation:
Mind = O-point x ∞ World = Constant mapping.
And this is the mathematical explanation of the Galilean paradox: we do not want to see the motion of Earth to blur the forms of the beings we see around us.
And this is also our justification for the constant exchange of al those concepts and the use of Tƒ as temporal information. We are more interested in the quality of form, since it would be silly to talk of the speed of a protein, but we need to know the Dimensional Form of the protein; or of the speed at which we eat in a cycle of feeding, but of the quality of the cycle (feeding as opposed to reproducing etc.) This puzzles Physicists, which have the bad custom of thinking their ‘lesser’ science is the only thing that matters, so care nothing about the ‘whys’ and the ‘forms’, and the evolution of them, complex concepts that do get a better description with verbal causal time languages. We bridge this difference with extensive use of topology, the mathematical language of forms in motion.
Now the fact that form is more important than motion in information and that is why we classify information among the parameters of Tƒ, is shown in physical waves, which have as main purpose to carry information. So physical waves loose ‘energy’ as they move away from the focus, but maintain the form of its information constant across enormous distances, as that is their purpose in the ‘intelligent, sentient universe’.
This ‘sentient’ concept, is also denied by physicists, but ‘strictly’ needed to explain the origin of informative order in the Universe, and to solve as show quantum effect rationally (such us uncertainty which merely means the electron perceives the incoming bomb of the observer and changes from i=st-1 spread herd configuration to tight i=st particle state, as any herd does in front of danger, from schools to combat formations). Sentient perception of dimensional form with a mind mapping is thus the key element which explains why form matters to all beings within a certain Space-time Plane.
Speed of rotary motion or frequency however matters to deliver ‘fast information’ and specially to processes that involve travels through the 5th dimension: Sp xTƒ=Constant.
Whereas the smaller S implies a faster Tƒ, and hence the inverse properties of Spatial motion and Temporal form.
The many ways we write those metric, Sp x Tƒ=∆, Se x Tƒ=Ei, ExT=ST, or my favourite, ExI=ST, the function of existence tries to convey the complexity of the entire Universe and the way different minds select and perceive only a part of the whole properties. So for some perceivers, Space will be quiet space, for others will be motion for others Energy, depending on the number of space dimensions, time ages and st=i-scales of the 5th dimension the system perceives.
And so it happens with the perception of information as information, as form, as cyclical motion., depending on the number of dimensions and scales we observe and fusion within the mind.
Thus ‘salvo’ mathematical equations in the physical planes that translate the concepts established by classic physics, we shall exchange constantly all those similar terms, in general analysis and be more precise when we study, specific details.
(In ∆ST contrary to simplex science, physics is NOT that important, as the number of space-time planes of the Universe are infinite and so the fact we perceive far less about strings and galaxies made their knowledge reductionist and shallow as opposed to the maximal information we obtain of the human scale. So humans are the measure of all things and biology the queen of sciences).
Recap. Rotary motion, time clocks and forms are the 2 parameters of Tƒ, one of the 2 components of all realities. Information is the perception of Tƒ by humans, which require to mix it with motion that transfers the form to the mind, hence information is mostly carried by waves with form and motion.
Fractal space and cyclical time: 5D metric.
Now we shall deal with those two equivalences fundamental to the metric of the 5th dimension and the organization of systems as dual complementary systems with heads/particles of information and body/waves of energy, moving along fields/limbs of pure motion, in a simplified, qualitative manner first, so the reader understand an essential duality of the Universe derived from the co-invariance of the 5th dimensional metric: Sp x Tƒ = Constant
The space-time nature of beings encodes the secrets of its forms in space and its life-death cycles in time. This is what we are: ‘vital spaces’ with energy and motion, performing time cycles, called ‘space-time actions’, which added together form our existential life-death worldcycle, as beings made of ‘relational space-time’. So we write a conceptual equation to describe the nature of all the beings of the Universe: U = ∑ Sp x Tƒ= ST±4.
But what is exactly the full meaning of ‘space’ and ‘time’, beyond the shallow description of measure proper of physical sciences. The full understanding of all its properties, is truly the key to grasp the whys of the Universe.
So we will dedicate for each of the terms of that equation, ‘spatial energy’, ‘temporal information’, and scalar actions of space-time, a post to study the whole range of meanings in detail.
As once we grasp them, we will be able to ‘build up’ the complex systems and organisms of the Universe departing of its spatial, temporal and scalar properties.
Spatial Motion, ‘S’ for space and lineal, inertial speed and its ‘communication between planes’ or ‘energy’ is one of the two initial elements of the Universe – the other being Cyclical motion, clocks of time, and information. In this introductory post we consider the relationships between space (still perception) and motion or speed (moving perception), and the equivalent function ‘across planes’ of existence (energy, in which the transfer of motion, back and forth between planes is made through a ‘scalar’ magnitude (mass in the ST=4-6 scale, charge in the 1-3 scales).
We also introduce the equivalent concepts of cyclical time, time clocks, rotary motion, form (its still perception) and information (transfer of form back and forth between planes).
Then we deal with the second fundamental element of ∆ST description of space, its structure as continuous motion or discontinuous networks of ‘non-Euclidean points’, with parts. The fractal, scalar structure of space-time requires the evolution of mathematics to define a ‘fractal point’ with parts in which the perception of the form of the point as a point with volume crossed for infinite parallels increases as we come closer to it. Thus the geometry of the Universe is fractal discontinuous, non-Euclidean made of ‘i-points’ with volume that form bidimensional networks, which evolve into organic systems across multiple scales.
‘The parameters of space-motion energy and time-form-information are inverted.’
And then after this introduction we shall do a deeper more strict analysis of those 3 parameters, space-motion-energy on one side and information-form-time clocks on the other, to fully grasp the depth of scalar space-time planes.
Monads. The cause of Ðisomorphism: equality of actions= bits of existence.
Roughly speaking the absolute homology of the Universe appears in the essential monad, as its beats of existence are similar in all species, due to the faster speed of time cycles of smaller, shorter lives. So an insect that processes 10 times faster information, lives 10 times less than a man (7 years the super-organism of the ant-queen), but its total beats of existence are equal.
This is the first ABSOLUTE relativity principle of reality: all beings are isomorphic as all ‘phyla’ have similar subjective life durations.
Further on, all beings perform the same existential program of 5 actions (motion (accelerations), feeding on energy, informing and communicating, offspring reproduction and social evolution into a Universal.)
GST is based in this simple but profound proposition that all •monads, handle in each scale a similar quantity of actions through its exi=st¡ence, whose total number of Tiƒ frequencies, ∑(a,e,i,o,u) or ‘cycles of actions’ are roughly similar:
Tiƒ (∆i)= Tiƒ (∆i±i).
Thus any being of the scales is a living homologic monad, as it plays the same ±a,ei,o,u actions of motion, feeding, information reproduction and social evolution which define what biologists call the five drives of life, of which the highest one will be its social network evolution into larger wholes of slower ‘beats of exi=st¡ence.
We are all ∆•st, living dust of space-time, 5 dimensional ∆ûst, island-universes, performing cyclical actions guided by its minds- knots of timespace cycles, which we self-refer to our mapping of it all.
We all divide reality into our inner ∆•st mirror and the outer, ∆ust, we reflect and try to order. We are all dual soul beings, travelling across ∆•±1 planes, ternary beings that move in time its synchronous organism of space, mind-thoughts co-existing in the 3 scales of inner and outer worlds.
The •mind is the consciousness of the individual organism, the informative time being, mind or singularity with no volume in space, full of length in time, as it orders in the three scales its inner ∆-1 cells, its ∆º-organism and performs its ∆+1 worldcycles.
The mind is though only observable as a living soul-being in the outer spatial world in which its cycles are evident parts of a larger whole.
the 3 perspectives of the monad.
‘we are all kings or buffoons according to perspective’ W.S.
This said as the monad exists in the ∆-1 scale of maximal speed of information, and complexity, but perceives itself as the whole, including its territory of ∆º order, and has ambitions in the ∆+1 whole world in which it performs its world cycle, there are three ways to see it all.
Indeed, we are scalar universes of space-time, and the perspective we cast upon us defines the way we see ourselves:
∆-1… as Island-Universes, in the full meaning of the wor(l)d, with an enormous inner complexity of parts and wholes that extend down the scales of the fifth dimension to the level of atoms and particles, or…
∆+1: just as its an infinitesimal form, compared to the absolute whole world in which we are a part or..
∆º: as a mapping or linguistic reduction of the Universe within us.
Thus we are always a Universe in ‘its self’, Dûst of space-time, but for the larger Universe, we are only ∆•st, infinitesimals.
And within us we are the center of our internal and outer world: ∆º
We are self-centred supœrganisms, ∆ºst of space-time which from the scale of the individual mind, as ∆ûst, observe an ∞ universe:So all beings are absolutely relative in the sense that their minds are ‘gods’ of the internal social world-Universe, û, they rule, and its micro-cells totally depend on the conjunction of the internal mind, Tiƒ, and the sensorial membrane that surrounds the body-wave and together seem to form the ‘being in itself’ to an external observer, which will only perceive the energy of the membrane and the motions of the mind-particle. On the other hand the being ordered in a larger external field as part of a larger network will be insignificant, running its inner actions knowing likely nothing of the whole and the purpose it has for the higher super organism of which he is a mere fractal point, atom, cell or citizen: •
Absolute relativity of existence is thus shown in the 3 paradoxical ways we express all systems and its minds as:
∆•st≈ ∆ºst≈ ∆ûst.
In the first equation the perspective is that of the infinitesimal mind a nothingness, a micro-point that ’emerges’ in a much larger world and an infinite Universe of which it merely absorbs a tiny fraction of its total information .
Yet as it does not sees anything else, the mind sees itself as a Universe of spacetime, as ∆ û st…
So it encircles and perceives itself as a space-time organism under its domain, co-existing in several ∆scales. In the second equation the same being, seen from inside seems an island universe, û, emerging as the relative mind God of all the territory you order.
The overwhelming importance of scale is then shown and understood since Shakespeare put it in verse, kings and buffoons we walk as fractal super organisms of some 1 trillion ambulatory cells. In the graph above, one of the first self-generating fractals, Cantor’s dust of space (white regions) and time (black lines).
But ultimately the more objective reality makes you bite the dust, and ∆st• you become again.
So how do you become from fractal dust, an organic topology? How dust r=evolves in parallel cycles, organising itself into a system that will enact its actions of existence maximising its energy and information, reproducing and finally evolving socially with other beings, till its excess of information collapses? It is rather simple and self-repetitive and all starts in a zero fractal point or mind that perceives the Universe. The many ways in which we can observe that process gives us the richness of the World as we see it, but if we want to build a causal process we must always start with the mind, which in a rather passive state, as the center of a 5¬Æ flow of bits and bites of information and energy will start to map out reality as a mirror-monad of the whole.
When we define what we observe – a ∑world cycle in time-space of a series of Ærrows bundled in networks, through a life existence, perfectly structured, we come always to the concept of a mind, and a super organism, an Œ being, whose mind programs a vital space, constrained by a membrane that divides it from an outer Universe. This ∑œ, world cycle, network, ternary super organism, is what we see all around. And it acts as a mirror that collect information by extracting energy and warping into a meaningful form, the being it feeds and observes at the same time. The mirror language of the future, then will move the wave, the lanwave is formed, and as the mirror-seed generates an ∑world cycle it does so through a series of simple commands, or actions, ∆ a,e,i,o, u, the entropic actions of motions (accelerations), feeding (e), informing, reproducing into a clone offspring (o) and evolve socially into a universal û: ∆+1.
The first three actions can be considered primary actions, taken place mostly in a minimal number of ∆-scales of existence, the actions of reproduction and social evolution though are secondary action, running the slower program of time of ∆-scalar evolution. And yet they are all simultaneously prosecuted by each part of the being.
We use for the Mind, or sense of the whole, software or will or program of existence, of the hardware of max. i, or brain head-particle, linguistic class of the system the symbol Ø, to signify its infinitesimal size and equation:
Ø-mind x ∞ universe = Konstant world
And also º, ∆º, as it conveys the sense of ‘location’ above the system, in the self-centred level of the being.
The mind is the language that embeds the game of existence as an ¬æ ∆ST BEING, in its bare-naked simplicity by reducing the Universe, which is the game we describe, to a world, which is a linguistic less-dimensional image of the whole.
But and this is the paradox of the minds of minds which is god (last post), the mind is a point-fractal with faster information than the whole it observes, with one more dimension, which brings, in i-logic arithmetic its infinite many-worlds.
This is the software of the mind. But the software can land in many hard-wares, or ‘particles-heads’, Tiƒ-systems, which will have a final point of view, fractal infinitesimal mapping-region on a domain it orders. The mind is the software of the brain, but it is the same brain-software that all other players of existence, which in each of its languages, is watching the same game.
Hence the same ternary universal grammar of all generated forms, which in a way express the mind’s view on the being itself.
The mind is truly the alpha and omega of the Universe, as it defines the boundaries of each whole, which breaks space-time into a fractal external and internal region, one ruled by the mind, which distorts and tries to break its existence within the Universe.
We could in that sense of the basic ceteris paribus models of reality we can make ‘work’, use the model of the Universe as an algorithm, playing in a mind of a binary language, O-time clocks and |-entropy lines. What that mind-program thinks, is all of us, virtual reflections of the ‘Mind’s Game’, on the motion of reality to which it tries to order and instill form, for the sake of beauty and perception of it.
THE COMPLEX DIMOTIONS OF INFORMATION.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).
But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.
Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:
So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.
So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow.
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…
The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E
The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is I-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.
The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.
For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:
Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K
A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.
How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.
Main symbols of i-logic Non -æxistential algebra
The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is ¡-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy.
Existential Algebra is my favorite term, since the description of 5 Ðimotions with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry, are about the ‘exist¡ential travels and troubles’ of any TimeSpace organism . So those are the wor(l)ds most often used. i-logic geometry and ¬Æxistential Algebra, being ¬Æ=¡, the best abbreviation.
The equations of ¬Æ are therefore the equations of Ðimotions taking place in time§paces.
And as any motion in a time space dimension, as per Klein, is a travel through it that requires the co-invariance of the equations involved, the general metric of any of the 5 Ðimotions, $t, ∑∏, §ð, ∂S & ∫T shall respond to that co-invariance, which we express generally as ST=K, when properly interpreting the symbols and parameters of those equations.
For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions. As the expression is inboxed lineal time space, it needs to be reduced to a suitable ‘discontinuous time-space, which is given to us by the formula of fractal lineal motions of a wave, V = $(λ) x t (ƒ); and so we say that in the absence of any external force, the lineal inertia=speed of a system, its ‘locomotion’ (only one of the Ðimotions of space-time) remains co-invariant.
The co-invariance of each of the classic ‘present-simultaneous ‘Ðimotions makes the concept of Klein relatively trivial for the usual dimensions of space measured with the same clock of time (a second) and the same rod (meter in Galileo, c-speed in Einstein) of space of Einstein. As we do not change our time and space rhythms except precisely when we come closer to the limits of the ‘fractal plane of light spacetime’ which is our ‘background’ perceived plane as ‘huminds’, motions through length, height or width are trivial as obviously the meter x second rods remain invariant (with the help of Lorentz transformations for closer to c-speeds).
Yet the concept becomes essential to fully grasp the different Metric equations of those Ðimotions.
Some logic elements of ¬Ælgebra.
The dynamic=temporal view of ¬ælgebra is though only one element to take into account. We use the term algebra precisely because it refers to ‘fixed structures’ and it applies perfectly to a key concept of non-Æ, the ‘existence of blocks of time’, world cycles of existence form past to future, which are determined by the general Ðisomorphisms of space-time applied to each different family.
How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.
We call the logic behavior that gives birth to ‘super organisms in space’, simultaneity; to ‘time world cycles’ synchronicity and to new whole planes of existence, ‘emergence‘.
So the logic of the 3 fundamental elements of reality are described easily in a dynamic logic way. But it is still left the biggest of all mysteries, ‘perception’ and we have no ‘trick’ to know why perception happens. So we must consider a pan psychic universe made of two elements, which are beyond causality, hence the immanent two primary states of being; motion in time and perception of space. They must therefore be the ultimate substances of reality.
In different posts we have studied them. Here we shall within the Kaleidoscopic, entangled nature of the Universe, in which each dimension is perceived from the point of view of other dimensions, consider a logic approach to those proceses, to formalize with more rigor, the causal reason of space, time, scale and the underlying limits of pure motion and pure form/perception – the a priori substances of the Universe.
In those cases from the beginning of our inquire a fact will become self-evident: as space is ternary, time is made of 3 Ðimotions and scales bring multiple parts into wholes, simple causality, A-> B cannot account for reality.
The logic of the Universe is not Aristotelian A->B lineal, but ternary A<≈> B, where A, the relative past-entropy and B, the relative information-future, converge into a present mixed energy state. So cyclical times becomes the basis of the ternary Non-Aristotelian logo of time in the Universe.
On the other hand, space is fractal broken by those time cycles in inner and outer regions, and by the singularity points or minds, in lower and higher scales born initially as seeds or mind-mappings that project the whole into the inner monad. So space is fractal made of scales and hence Non-Euclidean, as those points singularities and its volume of information are essential elements of the being,
Welcome then to the formal consequence of a cyclical time, fractal space Universe, its ternary Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean logic and geometry, which we ab. as ¬Æ=I-logic Universe (as I comes after a and e and it is the symbol of information.
You might next wonder why we use weird symbols of non-Ae logic in this blog. Can we just use the nice mathematical or logic symbols of the axiomatic method? Well, we can’t really.
Consider a simple law of Disomorphic time cycles: 3Ð ∆¡-1 ≈ 4Ð ∆ø
This might sound Chinese to you (: but it has a deep meaning and because we use the symbols of T.œ -Theory of the Organic Everything, it applies to everything in the Universe 🙂
So you fully grasp why we had to invent a simple, intuitive new I-logic language, as those are very general laws. Indeed, it means that any system or organism in which there are different scales, the 4th entropic dimensional action of feeding of the larger scale is symbiotic to the 3rd dimension of reproduction of its ∆-1 parts.
It is a lw of time clocks synchronized according to the actions they perform in social, organic manner. i.e. your faster cellular time clocks reproduce (a slow action of time-space or 3rd Ðimotion of timespace) to the tune of the larger feeding cycle of one day (faster timespace action). So we can write with our simple symbolism:
Trust me, this is truly the amazing stuff and ultimate generalization of reality – its laws of exi:st¡ence.
And they happen in human bodies, animals, plants, crystals, stars and black holes (oh yeah, the black hole ‘eats’ every 11 years, when the activity at saggitarius is maximal and its star cells, like the sun suffer a massive magnetic cycle of black spots or peak of solar activity which in turn determines the weather cycles of reproduction of plants in this planet… believe it or not, there are such cycles ALSO in the organisms of the galaxy).
But the beauty of the symbolism of T.œ is that infinite of such events are resumed with that very simple ‘sub-equation’.
And all sub-equations of reality can ultimately resumed with the simple ternary terms we have used for ‘time-motions, <≈>, time planes, ∆§±¡ and topologies, O x | = Ø, also expressed to make it a little bit more ‘amenable’ to humans, with the ST, 5 symbols of timespace dimotions:
- Ði: Informative particles/heads: §ð
- Ð: limbs/potentials: momentum: st.
- Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏.
- Ðimotion: entropy: S∂.
- Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.
The simplicity and beauty of the I-logic equations of the Universe that I hold in my mind-point alone for 30 years is such that all what exists can be synoptically expressed with the ‘world cycle’ of timespace dimensions:
∆§±¡:5D plane§cales of §pace ðime ∑≥: Present-reproduction <:Entropy >:Information |≈:Limb/Potential/Youth ≥:Iterative Bodywave O@:Old particles-heads: ΓØœ:Supœrganism
The universe is a repetitive equation of generation of local ‘Dimotions’, dimensions of space with temporary motions.
Its origin though is a point of space-information. And so creation always departs from seed that emerges after a reproductive, evolutionary process into an organism. And then again fro the head/particle, the mind of the organism.
CREATION thus goes back and forth in chains of steps of existence, Δð>S¡∑>∆º… as systems emerge into super organisms and then die in inverse equations: ∆º<<∆ð, with the caveat that in the entropic death the intermediate existence of ‘minds’ across a relative simultaneous present, S¡∑, is NOT present. This is the reason why is so fast, almost simultaneous, indeed lasting only a quantum of time.
It has to be noticed in the graph thus the existence on the path of life of 3 _≈ symbols of 3 ages, ≥ youth, ≈ reproductive maturity and > collapsing third age, in which there is a deficit to the total universe of two << as the ≈ presents are considered ‘not time consuming’ virtual conservative cycles of existence. S existence is virtual in each ≈≤< present ternary existence and thus explains which death which IS the same travel in the fifth dimension WITHOUT STOPS in the fourth dimension happen.
As if you haven’t noticed a present is a fourth dimension domain, in which present simultaneity is measure as a conceptual definition of an event happen in a superorganism.
So present 4D Space-time of adjacent super organisms which haver a present measure of time in its simultaneous perception by a still languages that commands a nervous informative language of maximal sensorial speed to become the linguistic image we take for still space-time state, will then be divided as we come across its formal reasons of motion between two similar states, to the concept of ternary anti symmetries.
As there are also an antisymmetric future to past fast descent into perpendicular death, a symmetric longing present of a life arrow and an asymmetric state in which that latent present lasts.
So minds evaporate fast into an inverse from symmetry to antisymmetry, but life has many times of present asymmetric missed liquid states. And so we can consider that 4quation from different perspectives.
-¬Æ Logic: Duality > Trinity
‘From one comes two yin (form) and yang (motion), from two comes 3 (qi-energy), from 3 come the waves of 10.000 beings’
The Universe is a fractal super organism made of 4 ternary A(nti)symmetric (ab.¬Æ) elements, Space, Time, ∆§cales, l@nguages related by…
Operandi: which can either annihilate or evolve the elements together, in two inverse motions which we shall call Balance≈symmetry that gives birth to ‘5D’ social evolution, Λ> or Perpendicularity V< antisymmetry that causes entropic dissolution-death:
- S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms.
- ∆: distributed in ∆±i relative fractal scales that come together EMERGING as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
- ð: a SYNCHRONICITY of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
- @: The mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions:
3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings.
And 2 complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.
It has to be noticed that creation is composed of two operandi, the balanced wave-state and the particle that emerges into the ∆+1 world: ≈ ˆ as a present-future coalitions, as opposed to entropic destruction, which is a simpler V form, a theme of enormous repercussions in all forms of existence essentially wave-particles preying over entropic dissolutions.
The study of those 4 elements and its operandi, which result in a social evolution together, or an entropic destruction is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.
WE HAVE highlighted the key ‘logic elements’ of those systems, which are profound laws of structure that define the Universe in its most abstract form.
There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.
So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries.
And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…
So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:
names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:
It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.
All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.
So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…
Asymmetries and dimensions.
Now, when two systems come together, there will be a relationship which depends on the equality of its 3 different parts will give combinations to an array of possible ‘consequences’, which can be tabulated in logic ‘truth or false’ type of graphs – which I will someday find on my files and put on the blog. Let us consider the basic relationships according to the equations/dimensions of information (1D), reproduction (3D)…
1D (T.œ¹) ≈ 1D (T.œ²) they evolve socially through the 5th dimension of scalar social growth, when they understand each other’s information or…
1D T.Œ¹≠ 1D T.œ² + 3D T.Œ¹≈ 3D T.œ² + T.Œ¹>T.œ². That is, they will enter into a Darwinian relationship that destroys the T.œ with lesser existential e x i force, when their 1D information differs but their 3D energy is similar… or
1D, 3D T.œ¹ ≠ 1D, 3D T.œ² they will ignore each other in parallel Universes as different ‘cat alleys’ when neither their information or energy is similar.
We have introduced in the graph with a bit more of complexity the logic dimensional laws that define how systems IN ANY scale of the inverse, from Atomic Ions or crystals to human societies relate to each other in darwinian, perpendicular ‘tearing’ topological relationships that ‘break’ the closing membrane of one species disrupting its existence, or will keep a mean distance to form social networks of communication that will grow into super organisms, starting the emergent process of evolution of species into a new ∆§cale of social existence, so you understand that in the Universe organic, geometric and scalar relationships are symbiotic to each other.
Its connection as everything else WITH THE 5Dimensions of reality is obvious. As it determines if the outcome of a relationship will be Darwinian=entropic or social=evolutionary.
It corresponds to the classic 3rd axiom of congruence which all geometric systems require, but unlike the classic postulate that defined only external congruence, as it worked in a single ‘dimension’ of points with no parts, the new postulate is far richer in meanings as it introduces fully the ‘different degrees’ of congruence according to which number of dimensions both systems have similar. In fact, it establishes a limit of similarity, to define identity, in a postulate similar to Pauli’s exclusion principle:
‘There is not in the Universe two systems which are identical in its 5 Dimensions, as in that case they become one’.
Indeed, it is NOT truth that 2 bosons occupy the same place in space-time, because quantum physics ignores the fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of relative social evolution that is the real place in which those bosons are found, when observed closely:
In the graph, we can see how a boson condensate grows in the fifth dimension of social evolution, ‘rising’ beyond the single space-time continuum where they were initially located, to reach a higher order. We can then talk of a ‘tail of absolute space-time’ being formed.
Classic 3rd axiom of Euclid ≈ modern 4th postulate of Non-Aristotelian logic.
In classic geometry, the 3rd axiom of congruence hold a special place, as the 5th because of its apparent contradictions. How can we determine geometrically a quality of ‘equality’? Schopenhauer among modern philosophers noticed this contradiction, but few realized of the importance of the postulate.
In the upgrading of formal sciences, the realisation of the ‘redundancy’ of the fifth postulate of non-euclidean geometry – definition of a point with parts through which infinite parallels can cross, equivalent to the first axiom – definition of a point with breath; and the logic nature of the fifth postulate, prompted us to reclassify them NOT as geometric but logic postulate which dealt with the rules of ‘engagement’ of vital geometry.
So the fifth postulate defined a mind, of which depending of the number of parallels that can cross it, we shall find, different @nalytic minds and graphs of perception of information in the Universe, of which 3 canonical frames of reference, the Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptic mind correspond to the 3 parts of any system (lineal potentials-limbs, hyperbolic waves-bodies and polar particles/heads).
On the other hand the fourth postulate of congruence has also a great deal of variations regarding the degree of equality between two geometric forms as they know have 3 parts, as ‘T.œ’. made of 3 parts. So congruence is relative as no system is equal to other in its 3 parts and at the same time occupy in the ∆+1 scale or world the same position.
The equality of the 3 parts however will determine if the interrelation between points will be constructive positive – when identity increases; or destructive, when identity or even inversion of coordinates happens. I.e. for example indistinguishable particles can become bosons and accumulate its form; fermions however would annihilate its wave state in antisymmetry to each other.
So the fourth postulate, is as important or perhaps even more than the 5th that defines a mind. And it is also related to the fourth dimension of entropy, when two forms are dissimilar, do not understand each others’ languages of communication and either ignore each other or enter into a predatory relationship
An exhaustive analysis of all the possible forms of relationship between two given points-beings, thus will be the fundamental guidance in all scales to establish the rules of engagement and according to the relative existential momentum/force of the being, who will dominate and how it will exercise its power over the other – or in identical particles, what social form will emerge of that communication.
Limits of humind sciences
Humind science is then handicapped by the incapacity of its practitioners to deal with the ambiguities of a multiple Rashomon effect on all systems, which at least will require a S-patial, formal, -T-emporal, moving, ∆§calar perception of its ≈ symmetries; and a reflective @-point of view of them all from an outsider mind, as all the information of the being is only within the being in itself, and humans can only access it through languages whose syntax reduces that information.
How the mind and its languages reduces reality has then to do a lot with ‘duality’ (the perception of inverse, S=1/T, contradictory forms) and trinity (its S≈T merging into an intermediate third form).
However humans are NOT aware of this relativism of knowledge and tend to reduce all those terms to a single one. I.e. they use T-duration, and care little for its inverse view as ƒrequency=1/T-duration, which reveals different angles on the concept of lineal vs. cyclical time.
There is therefore an organic, inbuilt limit to the one-dimensions mind, which we call the Paradox of the Ego, as biological minds select information from its point of view and languages. We shall try to expand it in opposite fashion giving notice of those inverse dualities and ternary fusions of the elements of reality.
Now for you to understand ‘fast’ what we mean by trinity consider an immediate picture of it: the physical Universe conserves 3 quantities:
- Lineal momentum, which is the motion directed by the will of the S@-mind with its formal spatial mapping of reality, moving lineally to achieve its ‘actions of existence
- Angular momentum, which is the cyclical membrane of the being, seen in motion as a time clock, ∆ð, that separates the being’s internal vital space-time from the outer world and creates its ‘standing form’
- Energy, which is the vital space enclosed by the angular momentum that balances both, S@, minds with lineal momentum-actions and ð-cyclical membranes, equating them: S@≈∆ð.
Those 3 ‘conserved quantities’ broken therefore into infinite vital space-time organisms, put together as a puzzle, give us the 3 absolute space-time quantities of physics. And they form the 3 elements of the fundamental topology of the Universe, a closed ball, where the open ball or visible part is the vital energy, while the membrane and singularity point or mind in its center are considered ‘something else’.
And as we move into larger scales we will find in all systems, a boundary from nations with borders to animals with skins, a mind-center or seed of information, from capitals and governments to DNA molecules; and in the middle a vital energy exploited by both, from military armies in the border and legal or financial informative people-castes in the capital exploiting the mass of population to black holes in the center of galaxies, enclosing a vital space of stars, with a halo of dark matter, likely strangelets, to use them as mitochondria of their reproduction, to your sensorial skin and brain exploiting your cells.
There is THEREFORE A VITAL ORGANIC PROPERTY TO THE 3 conserved fractal quantities of the Universe that ensemble into systems, and their properties are inverted regarding the ‘extended membrane of hardcore lineal proteins’ vs. the imploded singularity of informative warped DNA, which the middle vital energy pegs together.
So you can even understand death as the ‘separation’ of those two parts after exhausting the vital energy, so the membrane detaches warps, wrinkles and the singularity mind returns to its memorial repetitions, while the vital energy dwindles and as an old man you get all skin and memories…
VITAL processes are THUS the whys of all abstract topological configurations. And dualities and ternary symmetries are the elements that construct those configurations as all is yin yang and qi, that is motion, form and energy that combines them. Easy? Isn’t?
Ok, I know this for 30 years and nobody cares to understand so it is easy for me, but huminds are as we said one-dimensional, memorial, believers’ minds who only ‘think’ they think – sorry for the quips. FACT is reality needs no more than those 2 dual elements, spatial mental forms in simultaneity, the intelligence of reality and membranes of enclosed cyclical motions, clocks of time which deliver the cohesive strength of the systems; and in between the vital energy to sustain both.
So how huminds decided to reduce those dualities and trinities, and 5D symmetries into simplified one-dimensional actions?
The answer is you really can’t hold all the information- you will always loose information even if it seems irrelevant to you, as the Universe is ALL information and it does NOT fit in your mind – only a mirror image of it does – so you select it. So a better system of ‘full knowledge’ is the Rashomon effect and its expansion through the Disomorphic laws derived of space and time. In the future, as science expands thus the ONE-DIMENSIONAL LOGIC of modern Aristotelian and Euclidean thought will have to change for the Non-AE dual and ternary logic of these texts:
Hominids or robominds will have to deal as we deal nowadays with the complexities of quantum physics or mathematical inflationary multiple views, with the Rashomon and Diffeomorphic multiple analysis. I am aware I won’t see that happen, as I have no disciples and in the age of immediate rewards and simplifications, this in-depth upgrading wears the patience of the reader.
Fact is the ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time.
Let us then introduce the dual and ternary structure of reality.
II. FROM DUALITY TO TRINITY
HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE & TERNARY SYMMETRY BETWEEN SPACE ORGANS & TIME AGES
In GST, space is fractal and open, lineal and time is cyclical and hence finite and closed. So things do get far more fun and real and interesting and able to explain how ‘fractal space-time beings’ including you and me, made of bits of temporal information and bites of spatial energy mess together.
WE AREA ALL fractal beings of space & time. We are NOT in an abstract mathematical cartesian graph of space-time, but we are SPATIAL ENERGY & TIME. as when we say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’.
Once this is understood, we can start to talk NOT of the absolute space-time graph of Descartes and the mathematical physics that ensues, but of the ensembles of bidimensional time cycles and planes of spatial energy that put together create the ‘configuration, diffeomorphic, fractal finite space with boundary’ that we call a topological organism:
In the graph some properties of spatial planes of energy and temporal cycles of information, O and | that put together, Ø≈, create the waves of space-time that construct all beings of the Universe.
The beginning of reality is the ensemble of O and | beings into Ø=space time functions of existence.
To exist is to perceive temporal cycles of information with a temporal, informative, spherical geometry, and to sense motion carried about by lineal, limbs/fields that move, an intermediate ST-system, which will reproduce and repeat the system in the fractal space-time that surrounds the being.
This fractal, reproductive Universe in which all what exists are spatial lineal motions and cyclic, informative time-clocks, cannot make sense of itself if it does not show vital, intelligent properties in the ultimate nature of space-motions and time-informations. In brief, to make sense of it, the Universe of space must sense pleasure-motion-sensations and perception-information-intelligence. WE can of course describe as science does its external motions and develop a program, which seems an automaton program of existence: beings going around absorbing energy for its bodies, information for its minds, reproducing and hunting in social herds that organise themselves into complex ∆±1 structures to exist longer.
But then it comes the ultimate question. Why? What makes reality exist? Where is the will? Because it could also not exist. And the answer is that somehow to ‘exist’ is more pleasurable and intelligent than not to exist. That the perception of information by temporal, informative particles/heads/upper classes of physical, biological and social organisms, and the sensation of motion and pleasure, given by energy is higher and suffices in itself for the being to be.
Thus Space and Time likes to move and perceive, and so do all systems made of both motions. And moreover, there is not reason to choose between either perception or motion, and so the random chances that a system will lean towards one or the other state, is the random choice that makes reality constantly varying as when a system has enough information it tilts to motion and when it has moved enough it tilts to absorption of energy and information.
So we do introduce the mind-body duality and the ‘inner-outer’ description through ‘sentient sensations’ vs. mere how it happens analysis of shallow science from the beginning, because ultimately what we would like the reader to feel is that ‘communion’ which happens when one understands the simplicity of the game of space-time beings, and feel no longer an ego but just a domain of a self-similar infinite Universe.
When a system of information, head/particle, linguistic network of fractal point form an inward looking, spherical knot-mapping of information, a mind-form of imagination, which reproduces its fractal form of space time into a lower non-euclidean fractal space and cyclical time world, reality is born, as defined by the generator equation, in which space has 3 topological dimensions and time 3 ages – or sequential dimension of information, form-in-action, formal motion. With those two type of forms, moving up and down in the scales of the 5th dimension of ∆imaginary scales, systems lives its world cycles of existence. As space-time beings:
In the graph, the 3 arrows of space-time considered from the perspective of the 5th dimension, upwards in the pyramid, the ‘arrow’ of FUTURE, or wholes, as they co-exist with the smaller beings, and hence, as we increase the complexity of the 5th dimension; the arrow of entropy, with its inverse to the previous arrow, and the arrow of ‘present space-time, which is EACH OF THE PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION, OR width of the pyramid.
From this simple scheme we can deduce many properties and interrelationships between the 3 arrows.
In the graphs we se what reality is all about a worldcyle of space-time as a wave reflected and reproduced through the 10 dimensions of reality:
A 10 dimensional Universe.In the graphs 3 topological space dimensions, 3 age-time dimension, 3 scalar dimensions, and a ‘whole’ fractal mind-point dimension that emerges in an upper scale (here shown for the entire galactic ‘family’ in a simulation of the dark world upper scale universe.
Then those 10 dimensions of space-time 3x 3 + •.. the whole being, move through scales and symmetries of space-time is the meaning of existence, forming a world cycle of 3 ages, the next isomorphism of the universe.
CREATION VS. DESTRUCTION
The events of space-time as viewed with cones of existential force.
In the graphs in non-existential algebra we define the 3 states of time as asymmetric present spacetime, which potentially holds the entire range of states of the being, ≤≥, symmetric future > form and expanding, entropic <, past.
If we cut the cone at any relative moment of time, we get a slice of its ‘relative space-present existential force, where we can map the present sheet with two relative coordinates of ‘energy and information’, whose product gives us the existential force of the system (or alternately for some systems is better to represent them with imaginary numbers for information and real numbers for energy and then we can reduce the concept to a lineal curve).
So once we define the existential force of the cone, we can represent with those cones how the existential force of two colliding elements develop:
The 3 events of space-time then can be represented as cones, from left to right:
- A symmetric, complementary positive dual cone, which bring information from a relative future 1D vortex and entropic motion from a relative past, and produce a present symbiotic bilateral mirror symmetry.
- An asymmetric event in which the relative past, smaller system with less existential force is annihilated in the present but the relatively more evolved future cone with more existential force.
- An antisymmetric event in which the present point explodes, separating the 2 parts of the being, its relative future and past, particle/head of information and body/limbs of energy.
We could then wonder using the rules of existential algebra in its simplest operandi (superposition), how we can calculate those ‘existential cones’ for different events. Which we do according to the fourth non-Æ postulate of similarity.
What is then the simplest representation of a being as a cone of space-time? Obviously a single cone with the ‘point’ of minimal volume in the future and the present body of maximal extension from where a few ‘lineal limbs’ probing in the past scattering motion would depart. The graph shows that representation of a ternary system of space as it displaces in time, guided by the informative particle-head, whose body extends into energy and information, and its limbs scatter into the relative past to move the system. So this cone of existential time-space is the simplest representation of a super organism in time algebra
Death S@<<∆ð events thus can be considered as antisymmetry and life events, with 3 phases, ≥ a young age of relative motions that slow down to ≈ a repetitive age, followed by an > collapsing their age, become much longer in perceived present time, since its repetitive tendency towards present stages of time allow it through changes in cycles and motions to last much longer.
In the graph, the fundamental 3 dimensions-events of time as constructed by the existential algebra between past=antisymmetry, present=asymmetry and future=symmetry, starts the combinations that will form the ultimate underlying structure of reality and its ‘simplest operandi’, easily adapted from the mathematical inverse operandi and its group symmetries. We shall consider in this blog an introduction to what time permitted will be the highest level of comprehension of fractal space-time beings and its rhythms and world cycles of exist¡ences.
The highest level of formalism of the Universe is the process of creation of new systems or destruction due to the a(nti)symmetric properties of a system and its correspondence with the Future (Symmetry), past (antisymmetry) and present (asymmetry) in such a mode that we can calculate past, present and future combinations in terms of its corresponding topological, formal states.
Non-Ælgebra existential deals then with the creation or destruction of dimensions of time departing from present asymmetries, which are present forms that split into past=antisymmetry, and future, symmetry, the topological expression of which is:
|-past x O-future symmetry = Present Asymmetry Ø
So present splits in a superposition of past + future, past – future and future – past variations that can be added into 2 past, 2 future, and 2 past future on different orders, that become then annihilated or evolved into new symmetries.
Now in time we can write:
Present Asymmetry = (Future symmetry – past Asymmetry) + (Past asymmetry – future symmetry) = 0.
But if we operate them by product = 2 F x P; – F²; – P² which logically must give zero also:
2 F•P – F² – P² = 0
Thus 2 F•P = F² + P²
It is then clear that present FxP states are dominant and equivalent to the relative past and future superposed together.
This basic law of existential algebra has multiple readings. The simplest one is to consider that the period of present life, when energy and information are in relative balance and the being is fully functional has the same value in time and space than the sum of its young age/limbs and its old age/heads.
This first law of existential algebra happens in all the systems of the Universe: the present, classic, mature state of the being lasts in time twice the sum of the youth and old age of the system:
We can also apply it to the spatial volume of bodies which tend to be in proportion according to some operandi (normally sum or multiplication), equivalent to those of both the limb/potential and head/particle system, determining once more the dominance of present states over relative past-motion and future-form: yin x yang = yin+yang, we could write, establishing another equation which will interpret multiple equations of science:
energy x information = motion + form.
It is then through the proper use of the rules of bio-topologic systems departing from the I-logic postulates, interpreted with the inverse operandi of logic and mathematics, how a fully rigorous non-existential algebra that connects I-logic and current science can be established.
I have worked on it, lacking though as usual help and order in a very disordered way, it will take some years to fully find my youth notebooks and start to write it properly with more ‘Chicago Manual style’, on what it still remains here an unconnected effort (and if not, failing my age and attention at least leave a few seeds for future researchers).
Since once we establish both the meaning of operandi in classic algebra and its use and translation into existential algebra, we can start to operate in Temporal algebra from simple principles from where we shall extract some fundamental laws and properties of the world cycle, knowing that:
- Past is antisymmetric, and its topology simplifies into lines, that break the asymmetric figure in two parts that diverge and…
- Future is a rotary motion of angular momentum of the…
- Conserved present asymmetry…
Thus past, the line of opposite diverging exploded parts relateS to death with less form that future the angular momentum, rotary form which encircles the antipasti, into linguini, of vital energy.
The algebra of i-logic, non-aristotelian, non-euclidean geometries is thus essentially an existential algebra in which both the symmetry antisymmetry and asymmetry of operators can be defined both in time and space.
We then by convention define space as present-future, time as past-present and consider its static and moving forms. the line in motion.
The most important element of the Universe in terms of its logic and hence linguistic structure are its modes of connecting its ternary fractal points or ‘parts’ to build larger wholes or annihilate its organisms. This is the subject of Non-æ logic which can be observed either from a geometric perspective, or from a bio-logic one, through the actions of its organisms. We talk then of ‘asymmetric’ systems, Lines and cycles upper and lower scales, discontinuous parts and continuous wholes, which converge into a middle term. But also of the opposite effect: the destruction when the asymmetric terms do NOT converge but diverge. And this depends on its degree of similarity=parallelism or perpendicularity.
The mixture of both bio-logical and topological properties to determine behaviour is then an important feature of ¬Æ, which shows the essential S≈T interaction between space and time form and motion dimensions.
Let us then define the Universe and any event according to its topo-biologic behavior geometricaly in:
- Asymmetries, ≥≤, in which the potential for all outcomes exist as two different forms come together to meet and then establish either:
- A Destructive antisymmetry, ><, which turns into a first approach, > with a perpendicular, Darwinian relationship that will split the system, <, into an entropic destruction of one of them.
- Parallel symmetries, ≈, as both systems come closer to each other to start a social relationship of ‘love’ becoming fusion into a whole: ∑∆-1 >∆º
The potential 2 paths of future are thus defined first by an antisymmetry seemingly disordered form, which however has in its present Ø=|xO system all the potential outcomes.
Now for what has been said, the key connector with classic science is the full understanding of the dual algebra operandi, ±, x/, ∂∫, √xª as part of the classic logic game.
It is immediate the correspondence of those operandi with the dimensional elements ∆st, as:
- The sum-rest are the inverse arrows of the simplest superpositions of dimensions between species which are identical in motion and form.
- The product/division rises the complexity of operandi a first layer, and serves the purpose, besides the obvious sum of sums, of calculating the margin of dimensions, as combinations which are not purely parallel between clone beings, most likely through the recombination of its ∆-1 elements, as the product of 2 Sœts inner elements give us all possible combinations. Ie. 5 x 4 = 20 IS also the number of connections between all the 5 elements and 4 elements of both sets. So multiplication ads either a dimension of multiple sums in the same plane, or probes for the first time in an inner scalar dimension.
- Then we arrive finally to the potency-root systems and integral-derivatives, which operate fully on the ∆§cales and planes of the system, which require two slightly different operandi. As §¹º ‘social decametric scales’ are lineal, regular, so we can operate them with potencies, roots and logarithms.
- ∂∫ But when we change between scales into new wholes and new planes of existence we are into ‘a different species’ and so we need to operate with the magic of finitesimal derivatives and analytical integrals, which keep a better track of the infinitesimal ‘curved’ exponential changes that happen between two planes, where linearity is lost.
We refer the reader to the post on algebraic operandi to fully grasp the range of operations that those dualities serve.
Here we shall be concerned with the use of those operandi to calculate the basic laws of topo-biological systems.
Block of time.
In the graph, time is a block, but the proper way to interpret it as such is not the lineal ‘single plane’ block of Einstein, for if future does NOT connect with the past, it does not repeat itself, neither the ∆-view of determinist Laplacian time, as time does have ternary probabilities of branching, but the cyclical self-contained block of time, either in its ternary view of a pi-cycle that returns to its origin, or the somewhat more coherent ‘dice’ view, of a block of time with 6 alternative possibilities or ‘species’ of future, the 6th isomorphism based in the 6 possible ‘orientations’ or hierarchies between the S, T and ST physiological networks that define the being as dominant species of information, following/choosing that path, energy or entropy and its 6 hierarchical orders. Once those 6 combinations, s-st-t, t-st-s, st-s-t, st-t-s, s-t-st, t-s-st exist either in space as ‘species’ or in time, as ‘paths’ all the elements of the block have been created.
Finally to notice that the concept of simultaneity, which is what Einstein uses in his concept is relative to the speed of perception of the observer who might see a longer present, if it is a slower mind. So the absolute block of time, would be the paradoxical perception by the slowest possible mind of the whole range of existences in a quanta or ‘cycle of its own perception that happens in the last image when the circle of mapping reality comes to the repetitive red point after gathering information and then a still image occurs.
It is similar to the way a screen tv maps out all the pixel of an image moving the electronic cathode but we see it all together in a still mapping, so the absolute block of time, will be ‘God’ the slowest being, seeing it all in an absolute repetition of all possible limited combinations of the Generator as a block of time. Existence then as a block of time depends also in the detail of our perception, since in great detail the number of events are infinite entanglements, but if we do not see in great detail, blocks of time appear to our mind.
In the graph we see the concept of a block of time. If our ‘scanning of information’ lasted not a second as the human mind mapping does to create its spatial stillness but a year, we would see the image of a block of time for the earth, void of detail as a disk, and wonder if we know it all about the Earth, a mere disk. So indeed the perceiver of the whole Universe is actually a very slow thinker and a very undetailed dumb perceiver. We humans are in that sense ‘blocks of time’ in the perception of the much faster gravitational scale between galaxies, v>c and indeed we see in simultaneity a block of time, at that faster scale in our slow view with no detail.
So all minds perceive a block of time in the limit of its slow, dumb perception. – its subjective definition of vacuum space…
NON-Æ DUAL AND TERNARY LOGIC.
We shall start slow on the principles of the fractal Universe. The first being never better explained than in taoism: there are in the Universe an ∞ number of fractal beings made of 2 or 3 elements,which are in modern jargon the conserved cyclical momentum of clock-like membranes, which give us form, the lineal momentum of motion and the vital energy enclosed between them or product of its ‘zero sums’ through a full cycle of existence.
So duality ($t≈§ƒ) and trinity $t< ExI > §ƒ, is all what we need to describe a present, relative single plane of existence and the ensemble of beings constructed with them:
And it follows that the 3 conserved quantities of physics are merely ‘broken’ in the fractal Universe in infinite particles/heads/clocks of time with angular momentum, limbs/potentials with lineal motion and hyperbolic zero-sum vital energies between them, giving birth to our Generator equation: $t < ∑∏> §ðƒ, that describes all forms of the Universe. We shall then consider duality and trinity and its multiple cases across the different planes of the Universe.
‘E pur si muove e pur no muove.’ Galilean Relativity.
As Plato clearly stated humans are visual minds and have therefore a very difficult time when dealing with time=change, simplifying it, and often reducing it to a ‘dimension’ to measure space, distance… and its motion in space, v=s/t.
And this happens with the added disadvantage that Humans LOVE to think they know ‘truth’, and so they eliminate the interposed mind languages and perception elements from its assessment of the information of the being, whose total truth, ‘1’=one, only happens in the being in itself. All other ‘truths’ are human languages mirroring the being with lesser information than the ‘1’… and biased by the language’s syntax, including visual mirrors. This a priori conditions must be known before we can restart science from scratch, correcting the first sentence that begun modern science, as it shows the basic limit of our mind as a still ‘spatial’ mirror=language of a ‘moving’, temporal reality.
Since the mind either sees reality moving or still but not both at the same time. While in the Universe both, the space and time states co-exist.
So the mind tends to deny motions of time to all beings, and so it reduces its organic properties, to simplify information enough to fit it in the reduced brain of the being.
We shall do the opposite: to increase step by step the dimensions and hence the volume of truth of all systems.
So we correct the most famous statement of Galileo: the earth moves in time and doesn’t move when perceived in still space.
But GALILEO didn’t express the real duality of formal still space and moving time dimensions -‘The earth moves AND doesn’t move’ – but it took a single choice from its one-dimensional mind-world: ‘the earth either moves or doesn’t move’…
It was of course, the best choice, the one with more content of truth… if we had to take one, as time-motion is all, and space-form a slice of time, or a Maya of the senses.
This first duality shows how the mind’s languages influence and reduce truths – the being in itself with all its dimensions and properties, into human languages, by stopping the infinite ∆ðime cycles of reality into Spatial @forms.
Deterministic cycle vs. individual, lineal freedom
The second duality is far more profound. It concerns with the fact that as time or space grows, lineal, open free paths become closed deterministic cycles; and this can be observed in every scale of Nature when we ‘grow in perspective’. The multiple effects of this duality happen in all scales. It was found by Lobachevski in non-euclidean geometry, as the flat space should become curved. Already Kepler noticed that any step of a lineal motion will curve at the end. In life we choose our actions but at the end all come to a closed zero-sum worldcycle. We borrow our time to give it back to the Plenum. And as time and space are symmetric we can perceive this in space as a curvature that sequentially brings any point to its starting origin and in time as a closed path towards death.
In the graph, several sequential paths that become world cycles In physics we can talk of free momentum paths and closed energy cycles: the two momentums have degrees of freedom (lineal and angular momentum) as they switch on and off, S->t->S paths which however in the fifth dimension of parts and wholes, closes an energy cycle, which no degree of freedom.
The part and the whole.
In general we perceive space in a single Plane through the ‘3 states of matter’ or 3 ages of life and so it is not always so evident that paths will be closed, as they seem to conform to a single lineal arrow, and as events don’t repeat in a single path, they seem memories, free. But for that reason the 5th dimension ads enclosures to create determinism.
Determinism means ‘enclosure’. The wave diffuses and smears if it does not have a particle enclosure. Lineal waves then appear as the lineal path and particles as its deterministic guidance. Bodies are chaotic in search of smearing pleasure and entropic feeding, but the cyclical brain guides it. It is then when we complete parts and wholes when the full duality expresses itself.
So those two other physical dualities whose importance to fully grasp in depth the ‘real properties’ off beings, can hardly be stressed:
The duality between wholes, which is what humans seem to see more often and its smaller parts, which we do NOT see in a single space-time ‘continuum’, but are always there, defining 2 new more dimensions of space-time, the scalar ‘finitesimal’ smaller dimensions of parts, which we shall call the entropy dimension, and the larger dimensions of wholes, ‘pegged’ by the mind’s perception, both internally (the informative ‘singularity’ of the system that maintains its synchronous structure) and externally (the perceive). We shall call this dimension the fifth dimension.
And the duality between lineal and cyclical forms, which turns out to be one of perspective, as we see ‘flat’ the Earth from an ams all view, but as we grow in scale it reaches curvature to become a sphere, which will be also very important to understand ‘closed and open’ systems, ‘deterministic and free’, ‘curved information whose maximal storage happens in spherical forms and lineal motion maximized by straight lines’.
But again we observe that those dualities also connect with the duality of motion, which is perceived as translation of space, hence of waves, vs. the steady repetition and crossing of a point which is perceived as cyclical angular repetitive momentum. So – and this is a fundamental feature of the symmetric kaleidoscopic Universe humans have so much – dualities are symbiotic to each other, parts long for lineal memoriless free motion; wholes for cyclical, repetitive, enclosed form.
Parts and wholes…
are therefore the 3 key duality of reality: we can see things as wholes and then they seem deterministic as they work simultaneously or as parts in a larger space-scale and they seem free, each part going its way:
The 3 dualities: motion vs. form, line vs. cycle, part vs. whole.
We illustrate the symmetry of the ternary dualities of the Universe with another finding of Maese: In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D sherical particles.
Dualities in that sense come in ternary sets of spatial dualities, temporal dualities and scalar dualities. And so the interaction of 3 and 2 of trinity and duality is essential to all.
Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.
Hierarchical, nested, inverted symmetries.
It IS also important to notice the nested symmetry of hierarchical enclosures, which contradict what was a tendency inverted by the higher scale.
This again is an I-logic feature of reality missed too often by the lesser intelligence of the one-dimensional humind; which tends naturally as Plato noticed to lineal e-vident, single plane-perception, of detached parts, as we do NOT perceive the in-formation flows that form reality and are often hidden in faster lower scales (nervous systems, gravitational invisible forces, flows of money – in biological, physical or economic systems).
In I-logic however if A is B IT MIGHT BE that from another perspective of the Rashomon effect is NOT B. That is, from inside the ∆-1 parts might seem free, from outside, the larger ∆º enclosure breaks its freedom. They might seem lineal but in the larger view, we only see the cyclical enclosure; and so a fundamental antisymmetry arises, such as when we grow in plane-scale the function-form of beings change – including the whole, which is king of its inner territory but a point-particle in the larger ∆+1 world.
The virtual zero sum of it all.
So all those contradictions make us wonder, why? The answer is deep: reality is virtual, it could as well not exist at all. It must be balanced, all books kept to zero; no single point impose its will; all trip through the 5th dimension and its metric return from order to entropy. And only with the wholeness of dualities, trinities and 5Ds all makes sense, but it will require given the absolute minimalism of philosophy of science today a whole new age of thought in humans or robots for this upgrading to work.
The 4th and fifth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
ASYMMETRIC DUALITY GENERATES
SYMMETRIC PARALLEL COMPLEMENTARITY =TRINITY OR ANTISYMMETRIC=PERPENDICULAR DARWINIAN UNITY
So how the connections of the Universe play themselves? Simple: we depart from two asymmetric elements, the line and the cycle, the small discontinuous herd and the large continuous one, the motion and the form; and then they might come together as a single form ≈ which will be symmetric with itself, in its two parts, as body-wave, as a present co-existing network, that puts together parts and wholes, as a curved, hyperbolic geometry and so in a complementary FASHION they become one.
Or if the symmetry fails, they annihilate each other or one annihilates the other and absorbs it, in a perpendicular way.
The need for space-time together as an observable.
The Universe is made of space-time systems.
As Minkowski put it, ‘only space and time together survives’, or as the old taoists said: ‘all drop of yin has a drop of yang’…
…meaning pure motions (entropy) without form is not perceivable, as it appears only as distance or dilation – and this is call vacuum for the whole Universe; and pure form without motion is neither, as it cannot be communicated to the external observer and this is call Black hole in the galaxy.
The inverse=asymmetric properties of spatial energy and temporal information come together in ternary symmetries.
In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between Spatial expansion and Temporal Implosion in its infinite manifestations.
Duality: Sp-Entropy, the arrow of disorder erases Tƒ: information, the arrow of order.
Duality is the science, which studies the universe with both arrows of time, spatial entropy, the arrow of disorder and death vs. temporal information, the arrow of order and life – as opposed to physics that uses only entropy as an arrow of time.
To fully grasp the dynamic transformations and properties of energy and information the most important quality is the inversion of its properties and the possibility to transform the forms of one property into the other.
Cyclical In-form-ative time, Tƒi + Lineal moving Space, ΣSpe = 0-sum vital Energy
Yin + Yang = qi
clocks:angular momentum + Space motion = Lineal momentum
Small, still + Large, moving fast = Momentum
Tall, Perpendicular + Long, Parallel = Reproductive width
Hierarchical + equalitarian = Capitalist Democracy
Bidimensional Height + Bidimensional, Length,
Repetition + Width-Growth
Cyclical, Rotation, imploding + Lineal, uncoiling, exploding
Informative Frequency + Lineal Speed
Broken form + Continuous, differentiable
Intelligent, perceptive + Strong, fast.
Social, organic, creative + Darwinian, destructive behavior
Future, evolved predator + Past, energetic victim. = Present
Life arrow + Death arrow. = zero sum world cycle
Particles of Time. + Reproductive waves. = quantum systems
Female, Informative reproducer + Male, Particle principle = Reproductive system
Masses, charges + Force potentials = Physical System
Heads & senses +x Limbs = Bodies
In the graph several combinations of motion and form (also motion but of angular momentum), which combined into energy beings.
The dimensions are thus 1 for lineal motion, 2 for cyclical form and so 3 for Energy, which can be considered a sum of the 2 other elements (though the operandi to relate angular and lineal momentum, limbs and head with bodies will vary according to the phenomena we study).
Often in fact we shall use the product to combine them (for the meaning of each operandi look at our post on non-Ælgebra).
The rule being that when we merely peg adjacently a limb-particle system we add it, and when we combine them at the lower ∆-1 scale also we multiply it. I.e. a system of 3 elements and 2 elements will have 3 x 2 possible axons combined each element with all the other elements of the different set. So multiplication combines a system in a lower scale (and it is used for particles), and sum is a superposition more shallow in a single scale (and its proper of waves).
This resumes in its two fundamental equations: e x I = K (that describes any complementary system of energy and information, in space) and E<=>I (which describes it in time as a series of flows of transformation of energy into information), since E=I maximizes a product of E+I; and so we do have now 3 basic relationships E+I, E=I, and e x I to get a functional balanced form communicating across two scale.s
In physics it followsthose laws are always of the type ‘superposition’ for waves that ad, and product for particles: ST = Space quanta (H, k) x Time frequency (v, T).
So we can easily derive the fundamental laws of quantum and thermodynamics and the meaning of its constants, with the left side equation (which the nuclear physicist will immediately identify with the decay rate of an atom, and the ‘entropic believer’ with the Pv=nKT law of gases).
In that regard, we have now a better mirror theoretically to understand the Universe, with 2 arrows and its energetic combination, so we just need to apply it.
This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.
It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.
Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).
The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.
The constant transformation of one into another.
Despite their inversion, and this is the most important law of the Universe, energy and information constantly transform into each other. It is the principle of ‘conservation and transformation of energy back and forth into in/form/ation, forms in action’ which becomes the new fundamental law of the 4th paradigm, widening the principle of conservation of energy:
‘All motion, trans/form constantly back and forth into form, combining into energy beings, E<=>I’
Motion and form are the 2 primary elements of the Universe, which combine into complementary systems of energy. And those 3 ‘conserved elements’ akin to lineal, angular momentum and energy, broken into infinite fractal parts can then be ensemble to create the systems of the Universe with limbs/potentials, body waves and particle-heads that exist between its dissolution into ‘scattering entropy’ or its social evolution into tighter wholes. THAT SIMPLE IS REALITY when expressed with the dual->ternary->5D principles explained in this blog.
In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.
The 2 primary elements of the Universe, lineal motion (lineal momentum) and cyclical form (angular momentum), mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.
In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.
Entropy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.
For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.
On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.
How those four ‘logic dimensions’ of motion, information, stillness and entropy recombine is the truly fun moment of creation in time. As all combinations are possible departing from the first antinomial dualities:
Space vs. Time, words so confused in different human jargons that are kept mostly for tradition:
Entropy=expansive motion vs. Information=Imploding motion
Space=stillness vs. time=motion, the most used definition for them, which gives birth to:
Mind-intelligence-synchronous space vs. cyclical time motions, with its two inverse arrows.
This is the ultimate conceptual duality, that between the magic harmonious creation of minds of space vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.
Mind-synchronous space vs. time motion
Mind-intelligence-synchronous space vs. cyclical time motions, with its two inverse arrows, taking away the reproductive cycle from its motion steady state is the duality in its most conceptual meaning.
The confusion arises because it is possible in Ælgebra, existential algebra, create all kind of paradoxical ‘dimensional beings’, combining the antinomies described and observed in reality.
In a Universe of vital ratios of the type S operandi T, all kind of antinomies create a latitude for a scale of ratios, which becomes then in each of those antinomies, the origin of the scalar relative absolute ratio universe.