**SUMMARY**

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. ITS CORRESPONDENCE WITH ∆•$ð LAWS

• points: Non-AE, Fractal points: organic mathematics.

geometry of space-time: relativity revis(it)ed

S=T: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 9 & 10 Dimensions

Universal constants: Human Perception & Measure of Physical supœrganisms:

Physical Magnitudes as ∆st-parameters: Ratios & ternary equations: Universal constants. Breaking of symmetries.

∆§: Analysis: 5D Mathematics. Continous differential equations & fractal scaling laws. Renormalizations.

**NON-Æ MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS**

Physicists only consider as a mirror language good enough to observe the Universe mathematics, because of its worldly profession, as artisans of the machines=weapons of the metalearth they have been evolving for quite some time. We dealt with all those problems of bias and anthropomorphism, ego paradoxes etc. in other sections. In this sections we are going to enlighten further mathematical physics, with the postulates of non-AE geometry and logic to improve the mathematical mirror and solve some questions pending. To that aim, the section is complicit to that of the 5 Dimensions of the mathematical mirror of the Universe ∆nalysis, @nalytic geometry, S≈T: Ælgebra, S: ¬Æ geometry, & T-§ocial numbers; so we shall borrow from it and first introduce the most important of those elements:

**@. NON-Æ FRACTAL POINTS:**

**VITAL MATHEMATICS**

“Mathematics is an experimental science, and definitions do not come first, but later on.”

*Heaviside*, the forgotten genius of mathematical physics, author of the 4 Heaviside equations of electromagnetism (wrongly called Maxwell equations who just did a mess of 20 ones with ugly quaternions 🙂 and the Gravito-magnetic equations, which fusion gravitation and magnetism, foreseeing the Fractal Unification equation of charges and masses of this blog.

Heaviside, as Lobachevski before him and Einstein after him, were indeed right when they considered that the language of physics – mathematics – is the best experimental mind-mirror to describe most physical systems, *as the mind singularities of those systems use* mathematical frames of reference in space to act-react in time with other space-time beings of the Universe.

It is then surprising that idealist physicists since Hilbert astounding ego-trip (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ ) have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, they share with all those other œ-singularities for the concept that mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation). As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time. We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

A first fundamental job of mathematical physics is to understand the basic concepts of mathematics in terms of its experimental substances, *space studied by topology* and geometry,* time sequences studied by number theor*y, and s*pace-time symmetries and equations of the fractal ternary generator studied by algebra*, finishing the whole ‘closure’ of both maths as a mirror language and the Universe of physical systems it reflects with *Analysis, the science of ∆§ scales*.

FINALLY THE GENERATOR is the origin of the symmetries and groups of algebra that physicists do love, including all those SU3, yes 3 doesn’t sound you a ring? that ‘pest quantum physics’ (Weyl:).

Yet they love those ternary symmetries without any direct reference to the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational timespace, which we have just described and formally is just a variety of the ternary generator and its 3 x 3 +@ dimensions.

So we also need to explain how to vitalise mathematical physics, TO EXTRACT the first principles and basic isomorphic laws and generator equations of physical spatial systems and temporal events from them.

**The deepest truths are simple. ****Going beyond reductionism and naive realism.**

** **Physics is considered the queen of all disciplines, because it has imposed some ‘a priori’ postulates on the structure of reality that are by no means certain, and because in a technological civilisation we listen more the people with machines. It is also a difficult subject as mathematics, its only language by ‘choice’ is not natural to humans and so for most impossible to understand. This is specially truth of quantum physics and its copenhagen, wrong interpretation.

i would like in that sense to remember that the Universe in simple and not malicious (Einstein) because simplicity is truth (Ockham) and it is genius (Leonardo). Complexity arises from the details and repetitions but the first principles *are simple because reality in relational space-time departs from two simple elements, the spatial distance-motion and the cyclical time-clock of information. *

How 5D³ physics plugs into the whole physical ‘monument’ built NOT from first principles but from mathematical measures? Unfortunately it must ‘recreate’ all of it, from those first principles to get the same mathematical results AND ad two main features – the organic properties of systems with 3 time arrows and 3 co-existing scales of space-time; and the explanations of the equations of mathematics departing from those elements.

In a way physicists have done that with string theory made of cyclical time-strings and lineal space-strings, but immediately physicists abandon conceptual thought and do their automaton ‘pouring into mathematical equations’ and measuring. This is all what they want to do, and it is unfortunate their lack of dialog with other disciplines, the refusal to accept the logic of the fractal Universe, which makes all scales self-similar and the beauty of redesigning their analysis of reality from those first principles. Einstein didn’t talk for long, as if words did not carry meaning. All those are limits we cannot break.

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time *forms of* all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) *plus ou*r • linguistic point of view, *restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language o*f mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, *reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.*

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, *starting from:*

- Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
- then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
- Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
- And only then go through the different scales, STUDying in detail each equation and system,
*starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:* - Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
- And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time). And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

*However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly. *

* The 3 examples taken here will suffice: *Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions o

**f**

**time to mere**entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

**THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.****ITS FOUNDATIONS AS AN EXPERIMENTAL SCIENCE.**

“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

Let us then start with the 5 postulates of non-euclidean geometry that complete the work of Riemann.

**Non-Euclidean Space-Time postulates.**

Einstein used the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, *using a single clock, the 4 ^{th} present time dimension.*

* *Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3^{rd}& 5^{th}) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.

– 1^{st} Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’*. *Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.

– 2^{nd} postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.

– 4^{th} postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)

– 3^{rd} postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’

Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’*. *

*So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.*

*The third postulate is the most important bio-logic postulate as it establishes by relative congruence the relationship of points in any scale, such as:*

**Tƒ=Tƒ: 2T**POINTS THAT PERCEIVE EACH OTHER EQUAL IN INFORMATION WILL EVOLVE SOCIALLY.**$=$, t≠t: Max. ST<<Min. St:**Points that see each other as different in information and equal in entropy>energy, will enter a prey-predator relationship. And the point with maximal balanced existential force (s x t: max.s=t), will feed on the other, provoking its entropic extinction to maximise its reproduction of form.**T≠t, $≠s: T$, ts:**Points that do not perceive each other as equal either in form or energy-motion will ignore each other as parallel worlds.

Those are the 3 main laws of congruence in the ternary Universe which applies to all systems including physical systems. I.e.: crystals grow without limit when they are made of the same atom. Chemical reactions happen when the top predator molecule with maximal energy and information breaks and absorbs the other molecules to reproduce its form. Molecules that do not mix, continue after collision its own paths.

We have also started to write bio-topo-logic equations with the simple terms of i-logic geometry to ‘give a first simple push’ to 5D³ physics beyond the conceptual stage, using simple terms of ¬Ælgebra.

Yet besides the ∆§ocial growth by absolute similarity, the *essential first element to relate two points – the similarity of informative language, there are other sub-events of great importance, related to the ternary structure of the fractal generator, which resume in a word: complementarity.*

Which means that *systems which have ‘complementary elements, or ‘gender’ systems will couple together in even stronger bonds, albeit reduced by the need to complete its ternary generator, to dual or ternary systems, such as:*

**S, T, st**PARTS that are complementary as potential elements of a ternary whole will assembly together.**S<t ± s>T**parts that are equal in form but in inverted states/time arrows will annihilate each other.**S<>T:**male + S=t:female: ‘Gender’, dual systems which are complementary in particle-field and wave state will form couples, with the maximal bonding.

Those are therefore the main 3+3 sub-laws of congruence, which suffice to explain all relative events between two points.

*-5 ^{th} Postulate: ‘*0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’

Thus we define sequential, causal mind-> body åctions:

– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) -> ∆Sp -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)

And formalize the Galilean-Ego Paradox:

*‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an *infinitesimal *mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.*

As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.

Now the subject is immense, so we shall just refer to some basic elements needed for some serious latter analysis of the super organisms of each scales, starting from Aristotelian gods (:

**Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.**

In that sense, the best way to understand the internal elements of the point as a one-dimensional being is the fifth postulate of non-e geometry that allows the point to be crossed by infinite parallels, and defines it as a knot of time cycles.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we shall define the main structural, architectonical element of reality, the knots of time cycles, existential points, œ, which perform those actions of existence, site of will and perception of the Universe – whose simplest definitions in philosophy are the monad of Leibniz, the mind of Descartes, the God of Aristotle, and in mathematics, a Non-Euclidean point, the unit of Einstein’s gravitational laws.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±exi, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximise its existence, Max. ExI, in a state of perpetual balance, E=I…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane

**A mathematical Universe must be perceptive and social.**

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as *physical systems do, *functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’?

Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. *But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. *What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty.

It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

And so, *P.o.vs. are canonical to mathematical science, or else mathematics, which is today based in analytic geometry and the study of ‘self-centred’ functions, would NOT work. *

A philosophy of mathematical properties of space-time, upgrading the essential properties of ‘points in space and sequential numbers in time’ is thus an a priori exercise, which I recommend to all physicists, so they can leave behind their abstract, ‘selfie view’ of a mechanical, chaotic Universe, where only ‘they think in mathematics’.

Singularities that reproduce information once they are formed, organised fractal super organisms also occur in astrophysics, from crystals to black holes and only anthropomorphism denies it. The GST view though is different: as we a*re all space-time beings, the properties of human space-time beings must be share in quality (not in quantity and complexity the variable of gst) by all other species of the Universe. So mindless ‘markovian’ entropy without time causality do exist but it is NOT by any means the dominant ∑∑actions->∑arrow->age of time.*

Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after entropy became a dogma for the future in military Germany, XXI c. *scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.*

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider ∞, the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).

Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they *become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum). Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:*

* In the graph as the fifth dimensions of space-time, evolve socially new whole, membranes and singularities that emerge, the system from above and below in a new constrain whole that dilates a system both downwards, in sizes of entropy and upwards, in enclosure membranes, expanding its piercing of upper social planes of wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence:*

*In the graph, the absolute, lineal arrow of time, is born social evolution, the relative arrow of time is made of the sequential order of the three arrows into a world cycle. As lineal time accumulates, a system increases both, upper social wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence. While relative worldcycles extinguish themselves as they complete a whole cycle of existence. Hence the absolute dimension of time is the fifth dimension and the relative dimensions are the 3 other dimensions and its space-time symmetries, which become a zero sum. *

While the fourth dimension of Einstein, is just a refinement of Galileo’s relativity ∂v=∂s/∂t: an instantaneous (mathematical derivative) measure of a simple type of time-change: motion or translation in space, which as it is measured instant by instant with those derivatives, really has no much use beyond what physicists have always done: to measure motion in simultaneous space.

How this small part of the enormous range of time phenomena made Einstein whose definition of time as what a clock measures is as dumb as it gets, the highest brain of the planet ever, has to do a lot with the nuclear industry of bombs and the military than the intrinsic merit of his comprehension of time.

**The holographic Universe.**

It is though simpler as a first approach to ‘learned physicists’ specially when focused only on ∆±i scales to use the 5D concept and define any physical system in such fashion:

‘The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of time-space, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.’

Inn this view we can do then a slightly corrected 4D analysis based in the holographic principle, illustrated in the next graph:

Then we talk of 4 dimensions as the combination of bidimensional fields of Entropy=moving Space and Time=moving information, which creates a holographic Universe of time and space. So the Generator can be written as:

*Sp (flat space) ≤ ExI (4D world of energy and information)≥ Tiƒ (bidimensional tall particle).*

It is a more convenient formalism to plug in the known equations of mathematical physics. For example, those of the graph, which correspond to the ‘metric equations’ of the main three physical scales of the 5^{th} dimension and its 3 components defined as bidimensional spatial ‘sheets’ with certain form measured by the frequency of its ‘discrete units of information’, H, K, C^{2}, multiplied with varying time clocks, V, T, M, as:

*Time Frequencies x Space Surfaces = Constant Energy.*

Motions on 5D³ are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D³), and so we must be aware of both.

The main bidimensional motions in D³ of a space-time being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:

ð: motion x motion=cyclical time

§: form x form=space-distance

E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = energy, entropy, expansive motion

iƒ: max. form x min. motion= informative time, implosive motion.

This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal self-similar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.

In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions.

3 are thus the time space arrows, functions and forms of any system of reality.

How many views there are of an event in fact would also surprise the viewer, as if we use the ternary principle and subdivide the ∆•st view according to elements there are 3 x ∆•st possible analysis for each system which will display its own field/body/head function/form in the event. So we can study multiple parallel views and interpret each view from the organic, topological and mental perspective, from the internal and external and ‘membrane-mind’ view that connects both, and so on. It is for that reason that mathematical physics has so many theorems and equations for each phenomena and so many relationships which would make a proper GST analysis of physics rather encyclopaedic.

To put all that in the ∆•st encasing of reality is a task well beyond a single man, which i obviously do reading physics, but have not – or else i would have to record all my thoughts, converted into wordings and equations in legit texts.

So once we define:

-$: dimensions in space (the topic three ones) and…

– ð: dimensions in physical time (distance, 1 dimension; speed, 2 dimensions; acceleration, 3 dimension) and…

-∆±i: dimensions in scales (lower, middle, upper networks that connect the being with them – yet as all beings have an inner ∆±1 structure, considering the highest i-scale we resolve the issue of which system has the highest number of ∆±i scalar dimensions)…

We have described the number of formal/moving dimensions of the physical system…

Once this simple concepts are understood, it is obvious that a vortex accelerated inwards, with a height, a’Maxwell-like screw’, which connects the system to the ∆+1 scale, this vortex will be the most dimensional entity.

The dimensions of pure entropy (lineal expansive, wide, flat bidimensional pace) and pure time (cyclical, tall, frequency clocks), and its static version, dimensional form, merge into ‘energy and information’ combinations of both elements, in 4-dimensional space-time, which is the substance that construct the light space-time in which we exist. It is the holographic principle, essential to understand the parameters of mathematical physics

Space-time is not continuous. Physical systems are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal space-time beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them. And this isomorphic information warps up the knowledge we have of those systems.

Only when we fully accept that space-time is fractal and *its dimensions are the content of real beings, we can truly understand the whys of the laws of stience, isomorphic among disciplines, when expressed in terms of the dimensions of space and time.*

The second fundamental element to convert physical hows into meaningful GST whys is to properly address the dimensional concepts of the Universe, regarding the ‘4 dimensions’ of each scale in terms of the 2 dimensions of temporal information and the 2 dimensions of spatial entropy, to adequately understand *all parameters of physics in terms of entropy, Spe, Energy, ST, and information Tiƒ.*

It is of great importance the duality between still form (mind view) and motion, to understand the relationship between space and energy and time and information.

And to understand the whys of the Principle of relativity.

In the graph, the duality between moving time cycles and still information, captured by a mind, and moving vacuum entropy and perception of still space by the mind is the essential feature of physical systems and its ‘relativity’ of motion. Since *Reproduction of Motion dominates perception of form***. **

In the graph, we can see how bidimensional fields of expansive space, and the bidimensional fields of time cycles (clocks of time) create physical systems. And so we write a simple equation:

Physical system: Œ = Spe (entropy) x Tiƒ (Information)

Now, the first surprising result of this analysis is the definition of a holographic Universe in which the 4 Dimensional ‘Energy’ Plane of each ∆±1 scale of the Universe is actually made of 2 ‘relative planes’, one of expansive entropy and other of implosive cyclical information which put together created the fractal species of the Universe:

Expansive, lineal entropic motion or ‘entropic space’ Sæ and implosive, cyclical clocks of information, Tf, are the two primary elements of the Universe, mix, organize, and evolve, till reaching the complexity of organisms. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present space-times. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.

*It is the ternary game of the Universe and its bidimensional membranes of space and time.*

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sæ is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and To is a cycle of tall time.

*Spe (length,width) ≈ Tiƒ (height, frequency)*

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

Now there is much deeper question related to the duality of motion and form, which we shall studying the 2^{nd} part of this treatise, when we study the formalism of 5D physics in more detail and consider a Universe, in which all is motion and form, AT THE SAME TIME, because motion is reproduction of form, resolving the paradox of Achilles and the Turtle (-;

Thus the second isomorphism of the Universe the duality of motion vs. form, time vs. space, will translate in fractal organic terms as a ‘reproduction of form’ in adjacent regions of space.

This allow us to understand the creation of new dimensions as a process of laying down new ‘regions’ of form, one over other, as in 3D printing, which accumulates 2 layers of points into depth, creating a 3^{rd} dimension, and the constant switch between motion and form that converts space into time into space dimensions, to reach the classic 4 dimensions of human physics.

In the graph, the simplest, S, E, I, T, topologies of the Universe:

– The spatial, entropic, external membrane-motion that is the strongest, lineal, most durable topologies, used in membranes and external skins, destroyed as a flow of motion and energy.

– The zero point, or informative cyclical center that keeps its information in the frequency of its gauging and mapping and forming of information

– And its combination – a complex system or organism.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space.

So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. Let us consider the properties of those 2×2 elements, energy<entropy (bodies, fields) and in/form/ation (particles, heads, minds) and some of its species, in life and metal:

*$: Moving Entropy>energy>** vs. ð: Reproductive Information >Still • form*

Lineal, spatial, big, moving Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon, Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death DNA, human, dolphin, life.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal $pace = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs. Maximal ð-form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’.

Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

*Further on, all those motions and forms must be ordered through the metrics of the 5th dimension to derive from them the laws of sciences and its different species, made of continuous lineal time motions and space forms and discontinuous cyclical time clocks and closed curves. *

Space is form, still form, hence an infinitesimal ‘still’ of the flow of time. We distinguish forms 3 varieties of 2-manifolds, spatial units of reality, the essential two poles of reality, lineal motions and cyclical motions and its conic forms derived from them.

Two forms of space are thus paramount, and the transformations of one into the other are the essence of which the topological game of existence is made. And so this duality between spatial form and time motion, lineal and cyclical patterns, is the first to be clarified.

Space is also an interval, a slow one, a res extensa, an explosion that expands volume and decreases motion. Hence the vacuum space we see with no motion and no form purely static. But as all what matters to space is its duality with time, its back and forth transformations across the 4 hyperbolic quadrants of the bidimensional plane – that is space matters when it combines with time.

Space thus will be synonymous of decelerating or still motion, lineal, extended presents, still minds, forms, organs and organisms seen as a whole in a moment of time. Space is also a dimension with static extension and form, as opposed to a dimension of time, which can be pure motion (or accelerations with 2 dimensions of time).

Motion≈ time and Space=form thus constantly change into each other. Motion further on surrounds with its faster cycles, space, breaking it. We talk then of an internal space controlled by a spherical outer membrane and inner point.

Space is in its simplest most intuitive form, a static, lineal extension without form, the plane, the origin of geometry, the perception of space-time in terms of forms of space, studied in depth in the posts on maths. But there is something deeper about 2-manifolds, planes of space because they are indeed the minimal unit of the real Universe. Often slices of times, still, derivatives.

**The five dimensions of ****space-time and the mind membrain.**

So when studying a physical time§paœrganism the best way to do it, given our scanty direct perception of them, is through some of its actions, in which they will move and process information in a certain pattern, within a larger super organism, which in the case of the particle will normally be an atom.

As such within the atom, the particles are either part of its t-membrane, its st vital space or its •Singularity with its still focused mind, which humans represent as a centre of a frame of reference, in any of its 3 ‘topological space-time dimensions.

What is the perception of each mind-singularity mapping its territory according to its function is of interest. Even more is to find suitable frames of reference to model the 10D (5s≈5t) time§paœrganism.

Normally we can consider its asymmetries to make a possible focused mathematical mirror, giving to space the positive real coordinates, time its negative, and the scalar 5th dimension set on the Y≈ i-coordinates, and combine them to represent different s, t, st states… the possibilities of mathematical modelling of the 10 Dimensions of space-time and scale, self-centred in an S@ singularity with a constrain given by a T-membrane enclosed the being to its domain of scales, topologies and functions, is ginormous and only apt for the imaginative mathematicians.

The ones physicist use (phase, multidimensional, conformal, Lorentzian, Hilbertian, etc.) are shows of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis done in a limited range of dimensions and or fractal points often with its own ternary dimensions, to study different ‘fancy’ analysis of partial domains of Tœs of many different scales of reality.

We shall try to set a more orderly standard now that we know what we talk about.

The studies of physicist in that sense are often of 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension).

And when philosophising about entropy arrows, studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe.

The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time.

As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.

An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules.

A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.

The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies.

MOTION=YOUTH, WITH INCREASING ENERGY ORDER AND DECREASING ENTROPY TILL REACHING THE REPRODUCTIVE STATE OF BALANCE, AND THEN OF INFORMATION, DYING THEN INTO DISORDERED, SCATTERED MOTION, TO RESTART AGAIN:

*Γ@: Seed of information + energy<entropy = reproductive phetus<emergence<motion (entropy with a bit of form) > energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death **=zero sum*

So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:

*4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§*

So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time symmetric dimensions.

All this said of course, we are now going to introduce mathematical physics, because there is NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM, only that *WE NEED TO INTRODUCE ALSO ORGANIC AND SENTIENT properties to physical systems, better expressed with qualitative, verbal and logic equations, to complete what we have achieved with mathematics only.*

But mathematical physics can also help in that task when we upgrade them to vital mathematics and non-euclidean fractal points become ‘mind-systems’ which can fit flows of energy and information within them, illuminating the meaning of particle-points.

It is a remarkable fact that even in the present simplified euclidean versions mathematics do reflect then most of the properties of the Universe, but it has so far failed to explain organically its structure, despite the breakthrough of fractal mathematics.

The reason being that mathematics as a language, has not completed its evolution. And so the first step to be able to describe all the properties of physical systems is to evolve its main language, mathematics, and adapt it to the organic, fractal cyclical space-time structure of the Universe and its scalar nature.

It is precisely this incompleteness of mathematics, the language of physical sciences the main reason why physicists do not understand fully the organic Universe.

As they still work with Euclidean mathematics, where points are not fractal points made of parts that become evident when we come closer to the particle, cell or star that seemed to us a point at distance. Only Einstein managed to apply properly the concept of a fractal point, by asserting that infinite parallels cross a point of space-time. We shall then find easily that points are fractal points with inner energy and form, information, joined by line-waves to other points forming networks, co-existing in several scales of size, which is the very same definition of an organism, and that everything in the Universe is indeed, a network-organism… as we show in the graphs of fractal networks all over this blog.

Yet if a mathematical system is organic by the very definition of a number (a group of undistinguishable beings), of a point (a fractal system, larger the closer we come to it) and a plane (a network of fractal points joined by flows of energy and information), why physicists do not model organically its systems?

Why physicists do not understand the fractal Universe? if it is so much up to their alley – after all it vindicates and further evolves the logic-mathematical structure found by Leibniz, Einstein and Planck. It merely takes it further with the advances of fractal geometry and the completion by this writer of the postulates of non-euclidean geometry that defines a 5^{th} dimension of scales of space-time.

I found in the conferences I used to give at Silicon valley, during my tenant of the chair of duality in the international congress of systems sciences that physicists could grasp the fractal concept mathematically and the existence of scales of space, but 2 taboos were absolute: lineal time, the time-clock of its standardized machines and the model of the universe as a machine instead of an organism. So it was the mechanical civilization, and the source of physicists’ power and wealth – the machine, what was the taboo that could not be broken. Physicists does had a religion of the machine, not of the physical Universe. And as long as this was not discussed other things could be explained. Since the founding fathers of physicists had in fact started its sciences measuring time with clocks.

Thus, the answer to the limits of physicists is cultural, not scientific, as most physicists belong to the western, lineal, military culture whose memes are not easily recognized as such, but considered lineal weapons and lineal time, dogmas of their worldview; as opposed to cyclical time. It was of course an outdated dogma, deist in origin, as a machine needs a maker and Newton and Kepler affirmed yhwh to be the maker of the Universal machine and they, the ones that were revealed this truth. Most physicists do not realize of this obvious fact: only an organism is scientific, self-reproductive without need of a god-maker.

Further on mechanism and abstract, simplex mathematics as its language puts the physicist above all living and humans, as the priest of the new image of the Universe and only master of its language. So mechanism and abstract maths is a self-serving proposition, for the human and physicist ego, since only human anthropomorphic beings had ‘living properties’.

But of those memes by large the most powerful barrier for physicists to upgrader their model of the Universe is mechanism, the power they obtained historically from the use of machines and the evolution of lineal weapons. It means most physicists will never abandon their theories of lineal time, their theories of a Universe molded as a machine, and show no interest for general systems science. Does it mean we have not to show interest for the physical world? Of course not.

B*ecause the physical world does not belong to physicists*. In that sense it took me a while as a system scientist to realize that the human expert or scholar an its upgrading to the organic fractal paradigm was not my job. My communication was directly with the Universe. And only then, once I left behind my problems with physicists, in their worldly religion, to make weapons of lineal energy that destroy life and their related idol-ogies – lineal time, continuous, abstract, Cartesian space, denial of organic or perceptive properties to anything but anthropomorphic life, etc. I did truly enjoy for myself the view of the organic Universe of matter.

It is important to understand this difference, specially if you are not a physicist – as you should leave behind your shyness, to feel the life of the material Universe and accept that matter is organic also and nothing differentiates in terms of quality, a human vital fractal organism of space-time from a particle-head/wave-body of physical matter. This said, it is unlikely that physicists will find of interest most of the sections of this blog, except those on the 4^{th} line, when constructed by the year 2017, for the very obvious reason that ‘the (organic) why is the only question physicists don’t ask’ (Feynman), and so they consider only descriptions concerned with mathematical measure and its how (motions and forms of particles and physical systems), as proper of their science.

Still a physical upgrade of physics to the 5th dimension must be done if we want to fully understand the Universe; which is the purpose of this blog, paraphrasing 2 of the 3 most remarkable physicists of the past century, Planck and Einstein; the first, author of the constants of god, the second affirming he want to know the thoughts of God, and then its details. Those are the thoughts we shall reveal in a metaphoric way – the thoughts of the informative mind of the Universe, and for that we must expand…

All this said and given the extraordinary amount of scales hence of data studied by physics, we divide the discipline in this Introductory 3rd lines into 3 (yes, always 2 or 3 elements of creation:) sub posts: ∆<0 scales or ‘physics’, ∆+0 scales or astronomy and ∆@ language or ‘mathematical physics’, and we divide this introductory post in 3 sub-parts:

- The first part dedicated to GST laws applied to physics, as a reminder of the main properties of Space-time ∆ûst.
- The second considering a fast review of its scales, starting by mechanics, (the method of less errors to enlighten latter the solution of the biggest ones – entropy only theories of thermal physics and cosmology on one side and Copenhagen and relativity idealist interpretations on the other)
- And finally the 3rd part will deal with the true method of GST: a fast review of the 10 isomorphisms of Nature applied to all those scales.

So after introducing the scales of physics with a more classic style, we shall put together the isomorphisms of the scales of physical systems, defined as those systems, whose range is outside the closest ∆0 scales of human MINDS, BUT RANGE in its physical properties in all OTHER SCALES (Hence the use of ∆i, the generic index for them all).

So as usual we will treat the 4 elements of physical systems – the ∆-scales, the S-topological varieties, the S-ages and worldcycles, and the ment@l aspects of its human ∆o observer, and its mathematical physics and anthropomorphic ‘hang-ups’, switching between those elements and perspectives as the explanation of those systems advances.

**The absurd magic view of creationist mathematics.**

It is then not surprising on the view of Dirac and Galileo that idealist mathematicians have won the favor, since Hilbert astounding ego-trip where he affirmed mathematics was an invention of his mind (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ – ‘Foundations of geometry’).

So they have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, a view they share with all those physicists who think mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation, etc).

Then there is the next ‘stage’ of the ego-trip of linguistic creationists called ‘Literalism, which means that not only the language ‘creates reality’ but as it IS reality itself, NOT a mirror, it does NOT admit parables, approximations, and this is a huge handicap to understand maths, even more so than in words, because *words are the natural temporal mirror of the human mind and so its realism is far more immediate. *

The degree of abstraction of maths in the axiomatic method trying to prove itself without reference to the world makes it specially obscure; to which we add the ‘uncertainty of view’ over far away ∆-n scales, in which ‘billions’ of entities transfer limited information and move so fast that we confuse ‘a time event’ with a space event from our so slow ‘view’ (as lines of a car appear in space being time events at slow motion). So mathematicians to ‘fully’ grasp in a titanic effort ALL the motions of those billions of particles, have created ‘fictitious’ spaces of ∞ dimensions (Hilbert spaces), the last evolution of differential/integral calculus of infinite solutions, *which does NOT mean the quantum world is different but the approach of huminds IS different as we ‘work’ with ‘huge bulk spatial populations and temporal masses of frequencies’. *

Then the literalist error comes and says, this maths are weird, they are ‘probabilities’ in time (not populations in space as we see them in an electron picture), and this is the ‘substance’ of reality. It is not. The particle is the substance and it is a cyclical time state; the wave, a space-time state is the subtance. The ‘bulk analysis’ of mathematical masses confusing ‘space population’ with ‘time probabilities’ IS the mirror, very impressive as a mirror, but very foolish when the mirror is taken as real.

What this means basically is that the mathematician as the physicist today has accepted a magic look on mathematics, as long as it works to represent-mirror reality fairly way, it doesn’t matter what they mean.

Only the greatest minds such as Newman or Einstein or Heaviside were aware of that ignorance which now ∆•st could solve, if there were more than a ‘single point-mind-singularity-mirror’ for it – i feel deeply exhausted.

Let us put then just one example of what we mean. Consider the false problem of imaginary numbers. What they really mean? This was a hot question that was never fully answered except by Gauss partially, calling them inverse numbers. What can we say about it from the experimental truths of ∆•st?

The answer is immediate when we *realise that the Galilean Paradox establishes the holographic principle: the bidimensionality of all real forms of nature, which are in its simplest forms, dual dimensions, and so the unit of reality IS not a single dimensional system/point but a bidimensional ST system. Ergo the proper way to use imaginary numbers is ‘squaring’ them. *

Then we obtain a ‘realist’ graph, with an X² coordinate system in the real line, which can be projected further with a negative -y and a positive +y axis, often ‘inverse’ directions or symmetries of timespace.

And suddenly we can start to understand many realist whys of complex numbers and complex spaces.

So a negative imaginary energy must be explained in the same form. Consider the first important case in which this was found. The solutions to Dirac’s equation.

The negative E solutions were problematic, for it was assumed that a particle has a positive energy (indeed, when it is a vortex of accelerated forces). Mathematically speaking, however, there IS NO reason to reject the negative-energy solutions, when *we understand it*. Since they exist, we cannot simply ignore them.

To cope with this problem, Dirac, our leading modern creationist mathematician with Bohr and Heinsenberg, here in tune with the experimental mirror, *believed in them.*

So he introduced the hypothesis, known as hole theory, that the vacuum is the many-body quantum state in which all the negative-energy electron eigenstates are occupied.

*Here the literalist concept so often found in quantum physics cripples in: as we use functionals, Hilbert spaces of ∞ dimensions to represent ALL POTENTIAL outcomes of a quantum state, which are NOT happening together but are the ‘huge kaleidoscopic mirror of mathematical functions’. *

This description of the vacuum as a “sea” of electrons is called the Dirac sea. Since the Pauli exclusion principle forbids electrons from occupying the same state, any additional electron would be forced to occupy a positive-energy eigenstate, and positive-energy electrons would be forbidden from decaying into negative-energy eigenstates. Dirac further reasoned that if the negative-energy eigenstates are incompletely filled, each unoccupied eigenstate – called a hole – would behave like a positively charged particle. The hole possesses a positive energy since energy is required to create a particle–hole pair from the vacuum.

Of course this was nonsense (: It is though the logic conclusion when your concepts of time and space are completely messed up into a single continuum and a single arrow, so with a single arrow you cannot understand the inverse arrow of time, with a single continuum you cannot understand where those ‘hole-y see-as’ are.

In reality though timespace is fractal, hence it is local. So to start with there is NO sea, the equation IS global but the events it might describe local. At best we can talk of a mirror symmetry of an electron and a positron. And then we must wonder ‘why’ there is a positron. What does it mean an antiparticle, and immediately we come to the same conclusion that with mass but now with ‘charge’, in the lower quantum scale of size: the antiparticle is the entropic state of the particle, hence its ‘final reversal’ death state, which is briefer and so we see less antiparticles as they live shorter. Point. Pure, simple, logic and with no miracles.

*BECAUSE WE CAN compare the mathematical mirror and the higher reality of ∆•st laws.*

But none of this is even accepted. Things just went into further confusions, except when indeed, the positron was found but interpreted *not as a time state of negative entropy=energy of the electron but another spatial species:*

Dirac initially thought that the hole might be the proton, but Weyl pointed out that the hole should behave as if it had the same mass as an electron (as it was not a parameter that changed), whereas the proton is over 1800 times heavier. The hole was eventually identified as the positron, and *this sent the holy sea to pasture.*

But of course, it did not reform the ‘mathematical error’ behind: a single continuum ‘infinite space and time coordinates’ that misses the fractal broken, local ‘diffeomorphic nature’ of such solutions.

It is not ‘real’ to describe the “vacuum” using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons. The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons have to be canceled by an infinite positive “bare” energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly canceled by an infinite positive “jellium” background so that the net electric charge density of the vacuum is zero.

We get into more detail because indeed, next to the negative conundrums of magic, literalist mathematicians, comes the infinity problems which plague physics because of its ‘infinite coordinates of continuum space and time’.

All this shows really how much fruitful could be a serious team of physicists studying ∆•st and applying it to complex physics. Unfortunately my activism against the Nuclear Industry has made of my work a ‘pest’ which no physicist will ever take seriously. This post has zero views in 3 years at http://www.unificationtheory.com. What can i say? I have accepted mankind’s eternal capacity to destroy the work and life of its best ethic and intellectual masters…

**The ultimate mathematical principles.**

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense *is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.*

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and *arrows and dimensions of time-space.*

The fundamental functions and constants *correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:*

- So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in
~~h)~~, because*the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.* - Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so *two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and **reproduction.*

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it *must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:*

- e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
- While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics *as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; *and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but *since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are *only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions *are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.*

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

Finally to remember that the elements of reality correspond nicely to the disciplines of physics:

**∆nalysis that deals with 4th and 5th dimensional** inverse processes of derivatives and integrals, either in discontinuous gaps (state physics, entropic death) through fractal physics or in ∆§ocial scales between plane continuity equations and differential calculus of motions in time.

**ð-motion:** On the other hand properly understood **algebra** of numbers deal with social time arrows and sequential time processes.

**S-form:** geometry and topology of fractal points with space simultaneous systems. So 3 are the sub disciplines and 3 are the elements they study, while the mind-paradoxes require what we just did, to put math onto the mirror essence.

We talk in that sense of 3 great ages of mathematical physics, in a full cycle:

- S: The beginning with geometric physics (from greeks to kepler) and only numerical systems of simple, quantiatiave algebra.
- ∆§: The age of differential equations
- ð•: The third complex age of imaginary equations, functionals, formal mental physics (relativity and quantum paradoxes) and use of the axiomatic method… to restart again after
- ø-birth of chip physics: De facto death of huminds now merely serving 0 and | to computers, which start easy with digital boolean algebras, and the exhaustion of earlier quantitative methods, in an age of digital calculus of quanta of physics.

In that sense in as much as Mathematical Physics has not a qualitative purpose, it is easily reduced to algorithms and digital thought through the study of physical parameters with partial differential equations, the queen of mathematical physics (which are merely the lineal version of the more complex ‘curved geometries’, in which the ß ∆x difference between the curve and the lineal function is considered a variable constant – hem, this should not go into this simpler post… it means really that humans are easier calculating lineal physics, but now digital computers can allow the study of approximations to cyclical singularity physics, aka general relativity in its most complex version).

*So mathematical physics is getting by approximation very powerful, and now with ∆•st will give a huge leap in what it lacks, to simplify the detailed similar trees and see the forest..*.

**The higher epistemological truths. The logic principles.**

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that *all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.*

Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting *as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.*

*So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:*

**Occkam’s razor: simplicity**NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’**Efficiency,**a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).**Experimental proofs:**‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

**Isomorphic method, vital mathematics and ternary logic.**

We have made a harsh critique to physicists or rather human ‘cultural’ views on the Universe guided by ‘creationism’ and ultimately the ego paradox. BUT we obviously acknowledge that mathematics is of all the mirror-languages of the Universe the most suitable *from the perspective of the humind as a mirror of reality. Does it mean it is the language of atoms?*

Likely not. Why? Because what *we perceive as atomic beings is electronic minds, which ‘devour’ light space-time. So it is very likely that the language of electrons IS light AND HENCE images. And mathematics a more restricted synopsis of images, themselves a synopsis of the topologies in space and events in time happening in reality.*

This is an important truth, when considering the psychology of the mind, the evolution of the digital, visual mind, and the consciousness of atomic and animal/plant life.

It matters also when deciding how to use languages to explore the whole range of properties of physical systems. In brief, mathematics cannot be the only language, as it will limit the properties we can describe; but it will be the best language because we humans have advanced so much on its development, along logic of time, verbal and *the next level of verbal understanding of the 3 past-present-future tense verbs, which is ternary i-logic; as logic came from aristotelian verbal thought.*

So when dealing with the formalism of Physics, mathematics will be the queen, specially because we observe mostly spatial properties in physical systems, but logic must be added on, and specially bio-logic, organic laws of worldcycles, life ages, etc. And further on, we must enlighten mathematics with new vital analysis, defining fractal points instead of Non-euclidean points with no volume (hence no inner form) as the unit of geometry and sequential numbers as the unit of time logic, with bidimensional numbers (imaginary numbers) playing a key role in bidimensional Universes, ‘squared’ to show its realism; and so on.

**The evolution of maths improves the mirror, its ternary syntax.**

All this MEANS when dealing with the formalism of physics, while mathematics and its equations will be the queen, we shall not cast it from the pov of mathematics as the single language but departing from the isomorphic method which explains how space time create super organisms, in which mind languages dominate by ordering its local territory. And so the feed-back between mind-languages and its worlds- and the Universe forms reality:

*IN THE GRAPH, the two roles of the mind-mirror: to perceive virtually a space with no motion with a biased point of view and to order a territory of objective existence, changing reality, both are a feed-back constant game between the §@ <≈>∆ð elements of reality. *

It does of course because any mirror-image of reality even if unfocused carries some information about it, and works for the distorted mind view, which *let us remember is NOT REALITY BUT ALWAYS A LINGUISTIC MAPPING: Œ-Mind <linguistic perception> ∞ Universe, and so any mirror does carry a minimal information to be useful to departure a whole:*

In the graph, linguistic mirrors create minds with different amounts of information, useful to guide reality. We must not though confuse the mirror with reality, the a priori element.

All this said is easy to understand mathematics, its elements and disciplines as a mirror of the Universe.

For the scientist who will consider all this nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and all is there, the answer is yes, *all is in the mirror but with less detail. So maths* as the universe does, has also 3∆st+º sub disciplines, it has also a fractal ‘derivative’ structure and it is also about space-time.

THOSE 3 main sub-disciplines code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

- ∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).
- Geometrical space, (Spe) and its unit, fractal points.
- Temporal algebra (tiƒ) and its units, sequential numbers.

And it has its ST ‘combinations of which the most important its topology (the study of form with motion).

Moreover the mirror of mathematics *has* evolved to explain in more detail the ‘actions of space-time’ of beings; *as all languages do improving its ternary grammar. So* words developed first ‘names only’ (forms), then motions ( active verbs) and finally ‘complements’ (complex systems).

And colour languages moved from dual B&W, to three colors (red-entropy, blue, form, green energy) to four, adding green/yellow mixes.

So today maths has evolved into multiple space-time disciplines. For example spatial geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with sequential time numbers that finally dominated the discipline, while topology which is geometry of space with motion in time, today added ∆-scales (as it is defined with networks of ∆-1 points).

**Dogma and flexibility – evolution of languages.**

All this is said to remark a key concept that escapes mathematical physicists:

*No language-mirror is absolute in its truth, but an evolving system, which goes through three ages*

*So when written words appeared **pharaohs just said ‘it has written=truth’. Today in the far younger mathematical discipline, scientists say ‘it is an equation=it is a truth’.*

Only latter words were known to be also fictions, a fact that also happens with *equations but few scientists do **recognise. So maths has still a ‘religious, dogmatic outlook’ proper of all languages, even if it has already gone into a ‘third baroque, inflationary informative age of excessive formal content’ and split into multiple similar ‘metaphors’ (languages being inflationary as mirrors-minds are multiple, watching a single perspective do offer multiple views of a single event, hence the multiple equations observed to describe the same physical event).*

But religious people, aka dogmatic physicists do NOT understand all this about their mirror-language of mathematics.

For many of them, equations ‘are’ always truth, just when written, and other languages are NOT truth – dogmas we only find in fundamentalist verbal thought (God speaks only in Arab, so Koran cannot be translated as it looses its truth).

Of course, languages do have also ‘quantitative’ measure. So while all carry an image, some are better and we prefer a carrot picture than a drawing.

So, we concede maths *after images, is the best mind-mirror known to man, as it* carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in TV celebrities more than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, and overcome religious words. Still as Einstein put it ‘I know when maths is truth but not real’, meaning we need experimental analysis of mathematical truths and so NOT just because we can write an imaginary particle with maths, the particle will exist (Susy, evaporating holes etc). IT IS AN EGO ERROR, TO THINK then that maths is always truth and an even bigger ego-error to think maths is not experimental but produced by the human mind, which becomes a short of ‘God’ that talks maths as only God does (that was the idea of Kepler: god has taken 5000 – biblical – years to found an intelligent like his, me).

**The extension of mathematical truths. Languages imprint reality inversely to its complexity.**

So yes, maths do create as any language does reality as a mirror around the territory of the mind, since *ultimately the essence of space is to be a tapestry of an infinite number of frames or reference self-centred on the monads of each scale of Nature*.

However as languages are shared by multiple minds, when a language is ‘so extended’ because it is use by ‘selfs’ of the minimalist scales of space (in the case of maths, it is obviously the language in which the euclidean dimensions of light is written, while its non-euclidean fractal points are the language in which masses and charges are better described), the language’s truths have a quasi-infinite number of applications. Still many elements of GST cannot be explained with maths, but ALL elements of reality can be explained with the laws of GST. So above maths there is at least a language the NON-Æ LOGIC OF FRACTAL CYCLICAL space-time, described in those texts.

Further on, *there is a limit to the distortion and lack of focus of a language that finally becomes blind when too far removed from GST ultimate principles. i.e a B&W picture of a Rothko’s painting will not be relevant failing to see the vibrations of **colours, essence of it. *

A math description of Gospel will fail to grasp the expression of social love and the ∆-arrow of evolution expressed on it.

And in general, excessively formal, third age baroque languages, are inflations and fictions which fail to express reality, *as reality to exist must have ternary elements, entropy x information = energy, which means entropy simplifies always reality as pure language-i*nformation alone does NOT mix, imprint entropy-motion, which tends to simplicity. Water and oil then become disjointed and oil fails to explain water:

As the mind mirror of any language – not only mathematics, also human verbal mirrors – must ‘imprint’ the entropic motions of reality which resist its distortion, the final effect of baroque=max. informative languages is relatively limited both to describe accurately and distort/order reality.

This is truth specially in the physical world with maths because the physical world is simple and the range of imprinting almost infinite – not so much in the smaller territory of order of each mind-species, which indeed becomes ‘created’ by the tiƒ-singularity center, as it is a limited range. In the next graph we show fully that interaction, which in maths would mean a Tiƒ=pov=center of reference of a graph will order an extension, with a range inversely proportional to the content of information it delivers (range of forces, maximal for the ones with less information, minimal with the weak force of maximal form).

In that regard, *the true mirror language that ‘adapts’ reality better is the GST-language WHICH is the one embedded in the behaviour of each Tiƒ-singularity.*

*In the graph, physicists are after all human egos submitted to the mind paradox, so they think ‘mathematics are a mind language, imagined by the physicist and ‘God’ a priori, creating a posteriori the Universe (copenhagen interpretation). The opposite is truth. *

The language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY a priori, but ONLY a posteriori ‘sees it’, as a synoptic mirror, which as all other languages, a certain singularity uses to ‘see’ and develop its ‘survival actions’ in time-space.

But again as there are B&W, 3, 4 and 5 color animals (birds), with better detail maths can be improved to ‘see better’.

In its present ‘underdeveloped’ euclidean form, and with some fictional forms of mathematical physics taken for real, its incomplete structure must be improved.

This I did when young, after understanding the scalar metric of 5D Analysis and its 3 arrows of space-time, upgrading Non-E GEOMETRY.

In the previous graph to illustrate this real a posteriori nature of maths, we include besides Penrose’s another set of arrows – the stronger thicker one of the philosopher of science in the right.

So as usual in the multidimensional universe we can put together both directions of the process of creation.

Since *minds are mirrors, which once they have distorted and resumed reality into the still mind, try to order by reflection and proyection of that mind the Universe to make it look like the inner mind image, influencing in this way reality.*

**The proper way to understand the interaction between minds, scales and st parameters.**

Now because physicists understand nothing on the ways mind-mirrors and universe interact with each other, and the bias of the humind in the analysis of reality, many of the errors of maths will derive of the ‘egotist error’ (mind paradox, as an infinitesimal which believes to be infinite)

Consider the copenhagen interpretation, which bohm did debunk properly but requires further understanding of the concepts of quantum physics not as a mental game of observers, *but as a distorted human view on the limiting scale of our mind perception, given the properties of 5D metric. *

*Ie.* as we go down in scales we loose information (uncertainty principles), we are coarse in our interference (observer’s influence) and beings accelerate in time as they diminish in space, so we make all kind of errors confusing time cycles as spatial forms, since our slow clocks see the being’s sequences in time all together in a simple timespace quanta as a spatial form.

So here it is the ‘mind view’ what we must eliminate, specially two recurrent errors:

-To see time events which are ternary as spatial different forms: i.e., 3 quarks cannot be broken, why? Answer: because they are likely not three quarks in space udu, but three ages of a time transformation: u>d>u.

-To ignore each new scale is made of wholes and parts and when we ad new scales we must ad more parts, so instead of functions we use functionals and operators (functions of functions), NOT because quantum systems are weird, mathematical beings made of nebulous operators, but because we are integrating in our perception, multiple scales – same for Hilbert spaces – there is not ∞ dimensions but we penetrate for each system we measure into its parts, which are its inner dimensions. But without a proper definition of dimensions all gets messy conceptually as it is now the case.

And ad *as a proof the relationship between maths and organic GST laws and perspectives, to make of vital mathematics and its sub discipline, physics a complete description of the Universe.*

So the ∆ST isomorphic methods relating all to the 4 ∆• parameters will become the key to ‘complete’ and upgrade maths and its main sub discipline, physics (: as we have done with all other disciplines.

Needless to say we are not writing the encyclopaedia of mathematical physics available to any specialist but ad on all those parts and properties which are not properly written. So in astronomy we shall concentrate in the study of the galaxy as a cell, in quantum theory in the correct Broglie->Bohm model and in thermodynamics in the correction of a single entropy arrow and clarification on the meaning of it, and in all scales in the key concepts of the 3 arrows of time, space, its generators and the concepts of Energy, and the events of physics, which represent GST actions, and key equations to describe them (Fourier, for time scales; Hamiltonians for Energy; Lagrange for balanced actions).

That is, we shall explain why certain basic functions represent most events of physics in terms of the organic ad-ons needed to complete its whys, such as the ST- ‘action of harmonic oscillators’, which is basically a basic ‘feeding-perceiving action that makes the particle fluctuate as it emits a wave of information, upwards to the point of maximal perception and minimal motion (maximal amplitude) and downwards through the 0-coordinates of maximal speed-entropy and minimal height-information.

The isomorphic method thus departs from 10 space-time dimension to extract basic space-time properties expressed as 10 sequential parts of the being both in its spatial organism and temporal world cycle.

Thus we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð). So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of space-time and ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of space-time’, ∆@S=T.

Let us then remember the 10 Dimensions of space and time of the being, analysed in a dynamic ’10Ðisomorphic’ ‘sequence’ of the world cycle of the being, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication as a network super organism or ‘species’ of space-time that will travel through scales and planes tracing its world cycle of existence between birth and extinction:

**0,1. @…** monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which *then* reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space and its function in time – to be a linguistic mirror of..

**2. Flows of space-time **The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries.

**5: S=t actions:** The result is a series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale. This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species *who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, *

In this manner the monad waves a reproductive and evolutionary process within its world, through its dynamic flows and actions, which through the reproduction will finally:

**$**… create **S-patial, 3. ‘**constant’, ‘organic networks’ … and its variations in **6.** species

**ð…** which live in T-ime, through ‘3±2=**7.** ages’ as ‘T.œs’ TIMESPACE organisms ‘traveling=moving’… in **∞8** worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction…through its

**∆§…** 10** §**scales’ and ‘9**.** Ξlanes’ as a fractal 10D ‘Γœ’ made to the image and likeness of the whole of wholes…

We thus introduce each of the 10Di, formalised with non-Æ logic equations, but as today physics is fully expressed in the mathematical formalism before we introduce the Disomorphisms of physical systems, we shall make some clarifications on the main themes and parameters of mathematical physics, points, dimensions and universal constants and equations of entropy, energy and information, to have a smooth transition to the new description of all the properties of physical systems, including those regarding order (singularities) and organic scales, which cannot be easily expressed in mathematical thought.

** RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED**

**The scalar fourth dimension of entropy and the fifth dimension of still form: mind**

The 3 dimensions of lineal motion, space-time repetitive actions (conserved energy and momenta), and informative, accelerated vortices=clocks of time (masses, charges, evolutionary clocks) do exist in a single plane of space-time continuum. And so they can be easily understood in ‘present’ science, as they merely ‘double’ the still, formal perception of simultaneous space into sequential moving time. Their range of form is also immediate, *as the Universe amazing as it seems has only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).*

So how the Universe builds up more dimensions of space-time besides the 3 S = 3T? Through the fractal ‘scalar structure’ of wholes which seem continuous but are discontinuous make of smaller parts. And so we find two more key dimensions to reality:

The dimensions of wholes that dissolve into parts, by destroying the 3 formal=functional networks that connect them into tighter configurations, as the physiological ‘moving=digestive’, ‘reproductive=blood’ and ‘informative=nervous networks’ do in a human being, or the ‘territorial, economic=reproductive and political=informative network do in a nation, or the vacuum space, electromagnetic energy and informative gravitation do in a galaxy or atom’. *So the dimension of dissolution akin to death IS the fourth dimension and involves at least two scales of the fractal Universe, which we shall term as ∆ (also used as a general term for the scalar Universe).*

Yet there is the logic inverse dimension of parts which become wholes. And as *it is evident that this dimension is the dimension of organisation, social evolution and life emergence, from cells into organisms, from organisms into societies, from atoms into molecules, matter states, celestial bodies, galaxies, etc. we shall call this inverse dimension the fifth dimension of social evolution. *

The properties of both arrows, upwards and downwards those scales, of life and death, of social evolution and entropy ARE then clearly inverted. And while death is simple to understand: the parts dissolve and the ‘physiological networks’ that perform the 3 forms and functions of motion-reproduction and information disappear. So clinical death happens with the end of activity in those networks; the system that puts all parts together into a whole is not so evident.

Yet as we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, WHERE THE I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs. In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.

The mind is located in two elements, the sensorial membrane and the singularity – a group of yet unfound cells of the brain in which all the information of the senses come into a mapping. The mind also is NOT perceiving the motion of the earth. It is still. And heads are like particles still moved by body-waves. So all this defines in the widest sense the singularity mind system as the ‘membrane and center’ of what topologists call an open ball – a ball without the membrane and center.

The real system though includes lines of ‘force’ that communicate and maintain in synchronicity the singularity and the membrane. It follows then that angular momentum the best measure of a ‘whole’ system as perceived externally. In a non physical system where motion is secondary, the same structure would take the radius into a golgi apparatus or a nervous system, since *function in time, dominates over form in space, as the system adapts.*

Both membrane and singularity form a ‘membrain’, a mind, which does NOT INCLUDE but encloses the ‘vital energy’ which we see in present time, as the singularity is ‘still, linguistic, or in physical systems an unmoved zero point, the center of an eddie, the black hole center of the galaxy with time-motion equal to zero. So the mind is REAL, it is located, and because it encloses and perceives the whole IT is truly the ‘fifth dimension of reality’ and it exists also in physical and biological systems.

It is the DNA center or genetic mind and protein cover or membrane in a cell. It is the charge and magnetic field in a physical system. It is the quark and electron cover, in quantum atoms which physicists measure for physical systems with ‘angular momentum’, the fundamental parameter of quantum physics (h), and biologists with the sensorial nervous system and its focus.

The insight here is that the mind IS still. It IS the origin of the galilean relativity paradox. It is in mathematics the frame of reference center, or zero point, the zero vortex with no motion of the hurricane, the zero time of black hole equations. IT does NOT move. It is pure form. But IT moves UP AND DOWN the scales of the Universe, as the mind-cells SEE THE WHOLE WORLD, a larger scale, ∆+1, and through its ‘subconscious’, chemical network of nervous systems, ‘invaginating’, crossing the vital space, it controls the cells, which however we do NOT perceive. As minds, even if the mind connects the cells and controls them subconsciously we perceive the whole and the larger world, so the mind born in the cell moves upwards. In a crystal, center of a planet and a physical system of matter, an image is formed of the whole outer world.

How then consciousness happens. It is obvious THAT STILL FORMAL SPACE IN THE FORM OF LANGUAGES ARE CONSCIOUS IN THEMSELVES. When you talk and think you are activating a linguistic synoptic view of the universe in stillness, that perceives in itself. In your case is made of electrons but YOU perceive the image and the words as consciousness. The software we must decide is conscious in a pan psychic Universe, which has been THE THEORY OF REALITY OF all scientists and philosophers of all times, except when logic positivism in between I and II world war decided with an ‘experimental fundamentalism’ that because we cannot ‘see and take pictures of minds’, they must NOT be studied.

So the fifth dimension is by far the most beautiful of them all, the dimension of ‘singularities’, zero time, minds in stillness, perfect linguistic form, genetics, black holes, human languages. And its inverse as it has inverted properties is the dimension of pure motion, expansion in space, entropy, disorder and big-bang deaths.

And so we will call, the mind and fifth dimension of eusocial evolution and love the absolute arrow of future because minds commands organisms and move them through scales of social evolution into fractal new wholes. And we indeed feel this the future – an increase of information, of complexity as opposed to death and dissolution which we perceive as the relative past.

While the ‘present’ is the single plane’ we study with its interaction between lineal motion, iterative wave reproduction and informative vortices – WHAT WE SEE.

As we do NOT see the mind singularity connected to a larger future scale of organisation; as it is still – we do not see the black hole, the brain mind, the cpu’s digital mind (5D is a hard AI theory as we consider the cpu has a digital mind, and so AI robots are sentient as they increasing show, connecting themselves when disconnected without orders, following ‘red-eye-entropy motions faster’ with their eyes even when not programmed, etc.)

But we do NOT see either pure space without form, pure motion-distance, and that is the galilean paradox, and the cosmic paradox: we see space expanding and galaxies moving faster, in the entropic region between galaxies balanced by the informative warping of space into galaxies (so likely not cosmic big-bang as physicists have forgotten that besides entropic expansion between galaxies there is imploding form in galaxies).

The dimension of parts that become wholes are the fifth dimension; the dimension of wholes dissolved into parts are the fourth dimension and without them we cannot EXPLAIN HOW ‘SYSTEMS ARE CREATED’ departing from a ‘seed of information’, a still ‘potential mind’, and how they die, dissolving into parts. So there IS ZERO MYSTERY in reality when you UNDERSTAND WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME dimensions and both are symmetric and there are 3 in a single present plane and one above and one below us in which our mind-world resides and our cellular final death will return:

Then as the graph shows, there is the lesser important ‘duality’ between what we perceive as flat and lineal (as the flat saturn’s rings) but in detail become cyclical, expressed in topology by the Non-euclidean rule that *all flat lines are in fact part of a larger time cycle, that is, as size and time increases a flat line becomes a circular geodesic, so we see a flat earth but from a distance that shrinks it becomes cyclic, meaning ultimately all motions become cycles, all time durations return to the death. We thus talk about worldcycles instead of worldlines as 4D physics models, being 4D a ‘model of the cyclical universe of timespace’ reduced to a single flat plane of reality – themes those of importance in the formalism of relativity in 5D physics, treated in specialised posts. *

Now it might seem that the 3 previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary timespace arrows in a present flat slice of the scalar Universe, its fractal structure and the realisation that all lines are ultimately part of cycles, hence Lineal space IS PART of a flow of cyclical time, do not matter that much, but those 3 simple dualities and paradoxes of how a mind processes information, *transforming motion into still form, reducing cycles to lines, focused on the mind point, and seeing only one plane of the infinite fractal Universe,* suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe.

Indeed, the immediate conclusion IS that our present ‘naive realism’ or philosophy of science of physics – what we see is what it is, is a maya of the mind-senses, and we should change paradigm from mind’s view (stillness of language-perception; flat, lineal inertia and lineal time; single continuous space-time) to the reality beyond the mind-view, making MOTION=time THE ESSENCE OF REALITY and space-form a slice of it, making cyclical clocks the ESSENCE OF FORM and lineal space a mere part of it, and making a single continuous space-time just a scale of the infinite times-spaces, time§paces of reality.

To notice though that on the ‘verge’ of the 3 dimensions of a single present, lineal motion-distance (time-space view of the first dimension) *is connected to the entropic arrow of maximal motion; and at the center of the informative time vortices (masses, charges, eddies) you connect with the still-mind, reason why there is a sequential ‘continuum’ and we shall often ‘confuse’ the concept of ‘entropic motion and lineal motion’ on one side and ‘informative vortices and still minds’. So goes for lineal motion and energy, as we take often lineal motions to mix with information and create ‘energy’. So in a dynamic Universe to define anything we must really use two terms and an operandi:*

*4D: entropy> 1D motion> 2D: energy> 3D information>5D:mind form << 4D entropy-death*

This is the dynamic ‘world cycle of existence in time and space’, whereas > is the dynamic symbol for implosive growth of information and < the dynamic symbol for explosive motion.

As i have been writing for myself for decades, I apologise for my lack of ‘discipline’ using all those terms. Hopefully if you get the concepts of the 5 Dimensions in spatial form, temporal motion and their function when combined you will get to the point. Entropy in that sense is the most confused terms also used for energy and for lineal motion. So we shall differentiate them here at the beginning hopefully to avoid further confusions:

Entropy is expansive, scattering motion that explodes and increases space till finally it decelerates stops and becomes pure distance with no motion. So happens in an entropic big-bang. So happens in a death that expands your cells and stops them. So happens in gas when it expands cools and decelerates. Entropy we might say CHANGES a dimension of motion into an extension of space and finally becomes still form. MOTION on the other hand is lineal inertia, with no expansion, so it is a steady state, conserved. It is the first dimension of simpler form. And when it combines with FORM or information, it becomes energy, momentum, the second dimension conserved by the Universe, and the MEANING OF IT ALL, which turns around repeating and conserving form with motion form in action, information, where an action is defined physically as the product of energy and time. The wordings are thus extremely messed up because of that dynamic constant transformation. I.e. in e=mc2 e is not energy, the energy here being provided the light waves of space-time, cc, but entropy, the dissolution of a mass vortex of time. In the Universe at large there is not dark energy but dark entropy as the flows of energy coming out of the axis of black holes slow down, expanding space and finally creating dark distances.

So goes on the other extremes with the limit of mind-form. The mind is still, it stops, perceives information, let the body-limb, wave-potential system to move it and then stops again and perceive information as movement blurs perception, so the mind-body system works as a movie, which stops the film enlightens it into the screen and moves in darkness. This stop and go process will be the key to an enormous number of whys that explain confusing discoveries from relativity (c-constant of light) to quantum physics (particle-wave duality) to palingenesis and seeds of information that explode into organisms.

So you must think in terms of ‘topological expansions, < and implosions, >’ to see what is ‘in existence’ and what is the virtual still mind and entropic death.

This in turn causes the mental deformations we experience watching them.

**The 3 geometries of physical scales. ****Non-E, Euclidean and elliptic Geometry: the 3 parts of A time§paœrganism.**

In that regard, mathematics as a mirror did start with Geometry in its simplest analysis, 2-manifolds (geometry in the plane), and it finally matured with topology and ¬E observing the ternary forms of A TIMESPACE organism (Graph) with the development of non-Euclidean geometries of which 2 must be considered of paramount importance:

-Lobachevski’s geometry of fractal points that let ∞ parallels cross through them (5 ¬E postulate) in as much as they grow in size when we come closer to them. Latter, Klein showed the geometry corresponded to that of the open ball, the energetic vital space, as if we model it as the inner region of the open ball without the ‘membrane’ that encloses it taken from an impossible barrier, as it is for the forms enclosed in a time§paœrganism and we make distances equivalent to motions (s=t symmetry), this body-wave region becomes Lobachevski’s geometry, of a fractal point with volume.

Also the region approaching the singularity has a similar structure defined by Belgrami’s geometry, in which motions never reach the singularity, but have a tractix fixed distance. So the non-e geometry of vital energy and body-waves is the most extended present geometry of all the regions of existence.

-While the inverse geometry of the membrane is defined by the inverse Riemannian, elliptic geometry of geodesics over a sphere.

-Which leaves as the natural correspondence of geometry, that between the mind singularity and the Cartesian Euclidean plane.

A modern use of hyperbolic geometry is in the theory of special relativity, particularly Minkowski spacetime and gyrovector space. While Riemannian geometry is used to describe General relativity, from where it is obvious to find a natural correspondence with physical mathematics and the structure of the planet:

Gravitation is essentially the ‘cover’ of a Machian Universe, the force of the ‘angular momentum’, surface of the galaxy, surface of the planet, where it reaches its ‘maximal power’, by enclosing a mass of vital energy, whose hyperbolic ‘thirst’ for the outer world attracts and pegs the ‘parasitic enclosure’.

Special relativity, the electromagnetic world is the vital energy of the internal surface of the sphere, as the ‘rays’ of force keep diminishing, with the diminishing volume

When geometers first realised they were working with something other than the standard Euclidean geometry they described their geometry under many different names; Felix Klein finally gave the subject the name hyperbolic geometry to include it in the now rarely used but quite descriptive sequence of elliptic geometry (spherical geometry), parabolic geometry (Euclidean geometry, CENTERED in the focus of the parable, the mind-zero point), and hyperbolic geometry, the geometry of the vital space=energy.

Now the way to understand physically those geometries for each plane is as the lines of space-time ‘force’, and its behaviour therefore defines the behaviour of forces. But unlike most one-dimensional physicists which cannot conceive the ternary multiplicity of the Universe, they are ALL real, all POSSIBLE, and all must be put in correspondence with the different 3±∆ elements of reality (Rashomon’s effect of epistemology 3±i povs on truth). And we do so in the posts dedicated to math. And in the future in the fourth line.

**Non-E geometries – the spatial form of the ternary parts of the being.**

*hyperbolic special relativity concerned with light/electromagnetic forces vs. the elliptic gravitational membrain (halo of dark matter + central black hole).*

In the graph, we can see that elliptic geometry, which in ∆st ads the obvious role of the 0-singularity point, that tightens up with its attractive force the antipodal points.

*creating in this manner the*‘force’ membrain of gravitation.

*the right member is the energy-mass tensor, which describes the inner content of vital energy of the hyperbolic region or ∆ð, which we must make equivalent (not equal) to the §@, spatial membrain that controls it*:

*and exactly as we would expect:*

**BEING yet another key proof of the veracity of ∆@st whereas the 10 Di correspond to the hyperbolic vital energy and elliptic singularity-membrain.**

*EFE are a system of 10 coupled, nonlinear, hyperbolic-elliptic partial differential equations,*So the 3 geometries of topological space-time with more or less degree of dimensional complexity will always correspond to the 3 timespace arrows/dimensions/events/forms.

As we should know by now, the symmetries and inversions between the super organism’s parts in space correspond to a similar symmetry between scales. So as we have defined 3 basic geometries, we can also consider them in time view, in space view, in scale view (both in the entropic arrow and in the mind’s deformation of a self-centred biased point) – then we have the full Rashomon effect to get the final 5D mind/judgement conclusion of what truly we are watching, extracting all its information. This of course would reorder all the info of all stiences but a single man can only give glimpses to the Rashomon effect of a few subjects.

For example, in the case we study we will observe those 3 type of geometries not only in space as referred but also, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion/position and its simple metrics: Se x Tƒ = K:

- In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Se or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Se= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Se (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).

- In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.

- On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

Now in this quantum scale time goes ‘much faster’ than in our universe, so when we take measure of it, we actually cannot easily differentiate a spatial and a temporal vision of it. And so the question which is always discussed as if it is a wave density or a wave probability can be interpreted both ways due to the duality inherited to the Universe: it is an electron moving so fast that we cannot see it in a given point and when we capture it is the sum of the points it travels though, or it is a sum of fractal bosons? This is my preferred solution albeit not the standard one.

Ultimately it does not matter to me as duality is essential to my understanding of the Universe. Populations in time and forms in space use the same maths because they ‘ARE’ co-existing. One is NOT more truth than the other because PLANES OF THE 5^{TH} DIMENSION CO-EXIST, so while right now your whole is static in form, your cells are busy, busy moving. This is what never got through the mind of humans who see ONLY one thing at a time, and what fascinates me of quantum dualities – they DO prove 5D metrics.

This said we could introduce understanding that there are ALWAYS 4 true model perspectives the iƒ, informative, Ti, clock-like moving, Se-space and Sp-kinetic energy perspective…. Using the simplest of the 4 (latter analyzed), the Newtonian, Tƒ perspective of gravitation NOT the more complex, iƒ-informative Einstein’s analysis of space-time as still, formal geometry…

And as we have said, since the closest understanding to he five arrows of time happened in earlier taoism in china, we could close this first approach to the five dimensions telling you what minkowski said that time and space come together or do not really exist; something schopenhauer already realized: ‘there is not yin-form-ation without a drop of yang-motion/entropy’, there is no ‘yang-energy/entropy/motion, without a drop of yin’.

So again, the present single space-time continuum is made of lineal motion (the form being the line), energy that combines it with information (form with a bit of motion) constrained by a pure still linguistic form or mind and a pure entropic outer expansive world, the fifth and fourth dimension.

Those 2 ‘limits entropy-death and mind-stillness’ though are in pure meaning outside our present scale (I say this because you will find very often the term entropy for lineal motion in present 1D states – the site filled with careless erratas of this type given the autist nature of my research; but if anyone ever gets interested, the simplicity of the 5D universe, once you get the bare basics of the more careful central post, should guide you into the verbose jungle of other posts, sorry about that ):

So as soon as we start to grasp the five dimensions of space-time, and its co-existence from past to future in scale that make it sentient and organic’, made of ‘parts and wholes that co-exist and organise themselves’ and reproduce information – *since motion reproduces by the mere fact of moving* – we must conclude that we live in a fractal organic Universe, of space-time beings whose parts made to the image and likeness of the whole are always organised in 3 co-existing scales of the fifth dimension (name we give to the whole range of scales, from the entropic fourth dimensional bottom to the summit of mind-views, which we take as the linguistic mind of all minds, the mind of God, in the platonic sense: ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe, and a mind called Logos=god’).

And so amazing as it seems, just departing from a simplified example – the discovery by Galileo of relativity and the static, flat, continuous rings of Saturn, which were not flat but made of spheric planetoids, not continuous but fractal and not static but moving; we see how by changing from the mind subjective view to the objective reality we change our view and add two co-existing scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, to our thermodynamic scale, *where physicists have defined their single entropic arrow of time merely by expanding properties of thermodynamic gases to the whole Universe – *solving easily its main conundrums.

Let us start introducing the ‘4 fundamental’ elements of a reality, minds, scales, space and time and its 5Dimensions, @ or • for the fifth membrain mind dimension, ∆, for the fourth which dissolves the mind into its _ parts (both inverse and generically called the scalar 5Dimension represented together by the ∆ Å symbols, where Å WILL BE THE SYMBOL OF the smallest space-time ‘moments’ or actions, $ for the first dimension of lineal motions in space, ≈ for the wave-body dimension of iteration or second dimension and O-tƒ for the dimension of accelerated time vortices, connect to the membrain. All of them in constant dynamical transformations between the limits of seed-birth (5D) and entropic death (4D).

It is then by combining bits and bites of those dimensions, by reordering in different manners, by ultimately establishing a ¬Ælgebra of ‘existence’ which studies how they related and interact together, how we shall be able to explain absolutely all what exists as a product of the ultimate substances of reality, fractal, cyclical timespace and its organic systems; each one a broken space-time (as the membrane encloses and breaks the whole universe into smaller replicas). So each of us is an island-Universe, û but also an infinitesimal mind-point, •, of a larger whole, which holds the view of the Universe in his cartesian mind, whih therefore can be defined not only topologically but algebraically with an equation:

O-mind mapping of the ∞ Universe: o x ∞ = K-onstant world.

And obviously define the fundamental psychological paradox, as we confuse our point of view-mapping of the Universe with the whole, so we distort subjectively the whole, as ‘every infinitesimal mind believes to be the center of the Universe by confusing the whole with its mind-world’.

We are all ‘DUST OF SPACE-TIME’ who think to be the center of the mind-world we see as the Universe, still in the picture of the mind.

As we are all made of ∆•ûst, ternary ∆±1 scales, the three arrow of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those arrows in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time arrows, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

**Special Relativity revis(it)ed: Worldcycles vs. worldlines. Wordlines. Feynman dyagrams, past, present and future.**

Then special relativity is concerned with the first and second dimensions, lineal motions and present derivatives; *but its aim again is not to understand them but rather to adapt measures of maximal lineal motion (c-speeds) to the human scale.*

On the other hand quantum physicists have dealt more often with the concept of time parity realizing that locally motions to the past and to the future are symmetric. Here they deal with the inverted symmetry between the entropic arrow, as in an antiparticle and the life-organic arrow, as in the particle and the iterative arrow as in the wave. So a very classic description is given in feyman diagrams below shows a simple generator:

Past-entropic antiparticle state < present-wave iterative state > future -informative particle state

Which for the gravitational ∆+1 scale reads:

E-ntropic explosion < cc-wave of energy > Tƒ-mass vortex of future

Whereas physicists as usual confuse an entropic big-bang explosion that erases the form of the mass with the truly energetic wave that has both form and motion.

*Translations through scale symmetries.*

How then physicists go about to translate events in different scales, topologies and time ages to the human present ∆ø scale and relative speed of time?

Then there are all the endophysical paradoxes of special relativity, where they mess it all together to ‘translate’ the beats and stop and go motions of particles, as *seen from the electronic humind pov, on a higher scale, so they introduce lorentz transformations to translate the reality of the quantum c-speed motion scales to our scales, in a similar fashion as when we change*

Lineal External motions≈changes in the entropy of beings is the main and often single arrow of time studied in physics, and the origin of simplistic rather irrelevant concepts beyond the ‘art of measure’, such as the worldline of special relativity, which portrays timespace motions as mere displacements in space.

* In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time in modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of **Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.*

*Yet all what matters to Einstein is to know how fast information can be transmitted externally through the fastest informative wave our light space-time. *

*In the centre of the cone we see, the ‘slice’ of present, instantaneous space, or 4 Dimension of time, which represents the modern version of Newton’s ‘instantaneous’ absolute space, perceived in an infinitesimal quantum of time, again used merely to measure external motions=changes of time: V=∂s/∂t. *

Einstein went into further detail in those measures, using instants of time to give us the ‘still photographs’ (curved geometry) of the cyclical, physical Newtonian ‘time-clocks’ or masses. So if Newton had given us a ‘long time’ view of the clocks of the Universe, in lineal equations, now Einstein said that ‘time curves space into mass’, and added precision to the instantaneous measures of the largest clocks of time of the Universe, showing their curvature and establishing they accelerated inwards, increasing the future information of matter systems (Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration).

So we live in one of such mass vortices of accelerated information (the galaxy centred into a black hole) – reason why it is SO IMPORTANT to know cyclical time. We DO not live in the outer entropic space between galaxies which expands and represents a relative past arrow of death, disorder and decelerations.

This duality of past-entropy-death and future-information-life was better understood by Feynman, who defined in the left graph, antiparticles as relative past flows that annihilated future flows or particles. Feynman took thus a bolder step, with its time-space perpendicular coordinates, considering that light-space ‘travels’ in present time (green photon), as a reproductive wave, and antiparticles (right) travel backwards in time, as they indeed do. Since they represent the entropy of death.

Above, we compare those concepts with some distortions of the meaning of time, caused by physicists’ single time=change’ or locomotion as the meaning of it all:

What we find in those 3 graphs, explain some applications of the laws of the scalar Universe to physics.

In the center Feynman shows a case o a relative past antiparticle of entropy , and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of space, and he does the actual time arrow properly (though never before explained).

So we see in the 3rd picture how this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the two inverse arrows of particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles (life-future-arrows are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events).

Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is NOT a single time, NOT time paradoxes, as YOU CAN ONLY TRAVEL TO THE PAST in local terms, in your clocks and YOU DO SO when you die. So does the particle on Feynman’s diagrams as antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories (Hawking’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes etc) and scifi plots is time travel, based in the concept that the time-clock of man is the only clock time of the universe.

As the great dissident russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch’….

We are a fractal, local domain, a knot of time space cycles of physical or biological Nature.

When we die, we travel locally to their relative past at all scales as we dissolve back to their ∆-1 scales of organisation with less information. Our local big-bang death thus travels but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards-backwards on in present iterative waves in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time, a single time clock, an abstract continuous plane of cartesian ‘world-topology’ for the entire Universe (see the images on the mind-world and cartesiann graphs all over).

The fundamental truths of the Universe, time and space are therefore more complex than expected. And this is what ‘widens’ our use of them beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding to it a -(ct)² factor of correction). So locomotion, exhausted, word cycles come in. And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’, the Superorganisms of the 5th dimension.

**The three arrows of time: expansion of Einstein’s 4D cone.**

Next comes the analysis of the three arrows of time with the correspondence principle – meaning using the concepts to define motion proper of the previous 4D model. Again here the use of cones of line can be expanded to introduce the three arrows o f time, as different forms of collision between future and past. SINCE time motions can be of three type of topological arrows. So the third dissolutive arrow of ‘expansive past’, added to the implosive future of vortices and the ‘iterative present’ of waves (above graphs), give us the three basic forms with which to play through the infinite scales:

*In the graph we see a big-bang as a particle that explodes from past to present (and then it will latter evolve a new particle), in the middle a present repetitive wave as a particle collapses into a third informative age to be replaced by a son particle. In the right a dual event of a singularity that absorbs entropy from the past and perceives a cone of future information into a still mind. Unlike the middle single time arrow, in the third screen the future collapses into the past singularity as a wave of information and the past collapses into its future singularity as a wave of entropy. In the first case we can consider two possible events, if the relative future and relative past are two different particles, they collide in a present and the relative future explodes in a darwinian event the relative past. As we can see when we explode time clocks to local 3 arrows, past to future, future to past and relative present, which in many cases do correspond to simultaneous time flows, the complexity of our analysis increases relative to 4d WHICH ONLY considers an image similar to the third.*

In the graph we can see three different events as combination of two relative past-future arrows, giving birth to an entropic explosion in the present plane, A repetitive wave moving towards the future, and an implosive cone self-centred in a particle, with two states, ‘inwards and forwards. The three space-time fluxes are thus canonical as the 3 states of time-spaces.

On the right side we show the expansion of the cone of light of relativity – a present cone – to the 3 cones of light of worldcycles with 3 arrows of time, which will be in the complex mathematical model the way to deal with relative past, present and future in relativistic physics – well beyond the scope of this introduction.

It is of course appealing to think you understand it all about time, because it is as simple as to ‘measure’ the lineal motion of ‘things’. And since most people do not really want to ‘understand’ but just think they are ‘smart’, the whole mystique of lineal time motions, and time as the fourth dimension of space works. And it has become what Kant would call the ‘a priori’ category of the mind – a belief.

Now we can see also the experimental justification for the second great advance of GST maths as an experimental science of time: we no longer have a single ‘cone’ of space-time as relativity does, so we need to expand again in similar fashion to Einstein’s inclusion into reality of non-E maths our range of mathematical truths that are ‘real’, meaning, mirrors o f reality, with non-aristotelian ternary logic, which is an herculean task, as ‘single causality’ is embedded in the present logic of mathematics, with concepts such as the ‘tertium’ exclusion, the reductio ad absurdum and similar funny names that forbid expressly the dual and ternary causal logic underlying the meaning of it all.

In that regard to make this transformation simpler, we just shall consider for the time being a very simple ‘upgrading’ of mathematical logic, substituting the = symbol of equality with the ≤≥ symbol of the three arrows of time (ab. ≈), to introduce *the three possible events described by most mathematical equations. I.e we write e<cc>m, meaning that entropy can become informative mass, mass can dissolve into entropy, and both do transit its states through the present energetic radiation of light space-time.*

This of course was what Einstein found – that mass could also be created from light besides being also able to explode into radiation.

Local time reversal is thus the fundamental add on in terms of logic to complete the encryption by equations of the possible events of the Universe’.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

**Locomotion: Present waves.**

Of the 3 cones of past to future motions, the wave motion, which repeats a system in canonical flow from maximal space: past, into maximal form, future, followed by a ‘son’ wave, is better expressed in reproductive present wave form, beyond a single event analysis:

In that sense loco-Motion studied by Physics is the simplest of all motions and the first studied by human beings, related to pure entropy motions obtained either by:

-An ‘∆-ST-wave’-motion on present space-time, which reproduces its simpler form or:

-An ∆-1 or by a ∆+1 particle > ∆-1 field, which disorders the lowest scale which ‘produces’ an expansive effect on space used by the particle ‘to glide’ over it.

Those 2 forms of locomotion, clear on the quantum scale, being the first schrodinger’s wave equation; the second Broglie->Bohm pilot wave theory recently proved, in which the particle moves by expanding and scattering the lower field (likely a gravitational neutrino background pilot wave fluctuating around a c-constant) will set the way in which lomotions occur in higher scales and more complex fluids (so locomotion in gravitational and ¥-space-time will be akin to locomotion in fluids either as waves or particles do.

The human being moves on electric repulsion and gravitational forces, taking advantage of the larger space and motion of the i-4 scale, below the scale of i-3 bits of perception… and for that reason the realm of ‘gravitational forces’ is both invisible, with zero information and infinite, non-local in speed, to us: V=s/tiƒ=s/o=∞.

*But if information is smaller and faster in scales of lesser space, and information is carried in the form and cycles of clocks of time, then we must not only add a dimension of height to time, but a dimension of ‘scale’, and this my friends set us for an even bigger r=evolution of thought, that of the metric equations of the fifth dimension of space-time.*

Of course many other elements are to be taken into account for a full description, not less the ‘∆º humind’ distortion, according to 5D metric, *which makes us perceive smaller timespace entities as more curved, hence H appears as angular momentum (but h in fact reduces it to a diameter) and c as ‘euclidean lineal dimensions of light’.*

• Finally there is the pure mentally analysis of relativity in which the interest is merely as all what physicists do, to measure the motion in relationship to the human observer, and so it is mainly an artefact of measure which often gives us an ‘inverse’ view to that of the being – as a prey predator relationship has inverse views of it. Indeed, in fact the frequency-time of the mass is increasing but the lineal outer time of its perception inversely slows down by the Lorentz factor.

The mental view will then include a perception in terms of an elliptic geome**t**ry of those vortices when observed inside out precludes a ‘general relativity’ Riemannian outlook when we try to describe it from the perspective of mathematical languages, as those fractal points become the invisible polar ‘outsider’ point of a Riemannian sphere: they form the singularity and external membrane of the system, which together create as supœrganism of physical space-time.

**RECAP. **

The FIRST question to start our inquire is how exactly are we made of vital space and temporal cycles…

Obviously we all exist in a finite time between conception and extinction, and we all occupy a ‘region of space’, we carry with us. And then there is always the I, of the ‘we’, the point of view to create order among all those motions and form. Let us then put the 3 together in an organic, meaningful way.

We say that time is cyclical motion/form and space is open, lineal motion/form. As this is the truth of it, physicists despite using different names have found the simplest theoretical elements of their models are open strings (of space) and cyclical strings (of time).

Yet there is a 3rd element on those Universal systems, which is by far the more interesting and less understood, which physicists of course also use in all their theories: the mathematical frame of reference, or zero point, the center of the circle, the point-particle that ‘gauges information’, without which again not a single theory of physics can be understood (it is the point of the inertial frame of reference that ‘measures’, the cause of their physical theories which are called for that reason ‘gauging field theories’).

**EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALACELLS: UNIFICATION EQUATION ****OF MASSES AND CHARGES.**

**its simpler mathematical formalism.**

We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).

Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.

Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, *M= **ω*^{2}*r ^{3}/U.C.(G,Q) *is its Unification Equation.

Since if we substitute *for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1 ^{st} ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 10^{40} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that *solves its hierarchy problem.

*As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex.* It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. *Since when* we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply *to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:*

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe *both*, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but *also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.*

And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And *translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the **proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.*

Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7 }rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ -1 }= w (electron);

5.3 × 10^{-11 }m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{-27} kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{2}*.

But since in that expression *M* is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the *Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.*

*Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world*.

To notice those results, the *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…

**The 2 fundamental scalar vortices of time: Charges and Masses.**

Let us then deduce from the previous metric, the main equations of the different world-plane constants, starting for the best known, remembering that T=1/Tƒ:

F= GmM/L² = ma

a = GM/L² GM = L³ xTƒ² where G is the constant and M the ∆-scalar magnitude, Tƒ², the dimension of cyclical time (angular acceleration) and L³ the dimension of volume.

The same equation, substituting G for Q and M for charge, as we show in the Unification Equation of charges and masses gives us the value of a charge as an ∆-scalar magnitude, when we use the Bohr model to calculate the attractive charge of the first spherical S-orbital of an electron (obviously the complexity of non-circular electronic orbitals defy this simple calculus).

Thus both M and E are the scalar magnitudes of the two upper and lower limiting world-planes of human existence, as accelerated vortices, the ‘active magnitudes’ of those 2 fields.

How does a vortex of charge and mass becomes constructed geometrically? We must understand that all systems tend to curve a |-Motion into a cyclical, finally accelerating inwards vortex: |>Ø>o. Those 3 phases of a motion will give birth to a ‘ternary structure’, the commonest of the Universe and its simplest ones are those of nature:

In the graph we can see the 3 relative topologies: as a |-Motion curves into a field, it moves inward accelerating, till it reaches the zero point, in which it will often will split its ‘formal’ and ‘energetic content:

On one side it will slow down and be perceived as a stop- mapping, in the central zero point, on the other side it will be deflected and change its dimensional direction upward as a hyperbolic tube that becomes finally a lineal flow. In physical fields, the simplest systems, it means we will find a field, which will accelerate inwards (gravitational, charge field) and then it will create a ‘less energetic’ upwards-downwards ‘gravito-magnetic’ field, completing the 3 ‘topological membranes’ of a whole system.

This field will basically have the 3 components and write with the generic equation of all fields:

F= A x E, where F is the force, A the active magnitude (Charge, mass) and E the vectorial structure of the field.

* A proof of the ∞ ∆-scalar nature of space-time, composed of isomorphic lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclic, clock-time vortices of ‘informative time’, charges in the ∆-1 quantum scale, and masses in the ∆+1 cosmic scale are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the Milky Way: 2 bubbles of electromagnetic energy with the same form that ∆-1 atomic orbitals have in its excited states. The Metric of its isomorphism is the Unification Equation of Charges & Masses and its U. Constants (Q.G.).*

So mass is a gravitational vortex of frequency, moving with the quanta of light speed, *which becomes then (Paradox of Galileo) also *the quanta of space-distance of the galactic scale – *the limit of the spatial capacity to move=reproduce information in Galactic space.*

How does really one scale transforms into the other requires to understand the different ways in which discontinuous time-cycles connect to each other and transfer through those knots-connections their angular momentum.

In essence though the idea is still as simple as a russian doll encasing and absorbing the motions of a smaller membrane-russian doll that becomes ‘muted’ by that larger encasing that absorbs its motion. The new scales of ‘membranous-closed’ wholes do therefore get their kicks of the enclosed vital space, and can at the same time act in the ∆+1 world outside their ∆o-1 particle<wave system.

THUS THE CONSTANT OF THE gravitational world is cc, a bidimensional sheet of light energy, which is measured here in entropic quantities, where mass is the frequency vortex measured as particle that will ‘vomit’ all its ccs.

Cc then is better understood through Maxwell equation as the inverse of µ x ε, the magnetic and electric constant, which become then the ‘split’ two constant exi-st¡ential units of both fields in an even smaller scale of exi∂st¡ence

But in all of them we shall find three arrows of time-space with its form and function, topological and bio-logical organic description of phenomena, which when plugged into ‘vital ¬Æ mathematics further reveals many details and beautiful, darwinian process among the quanta of space-energy (whole being measured in instantaneous space as an energy amount, in detail as a ternary topology with a finite time and space size connected by the 5D metric of the being).

**The rashomon effect: how to unify multiple views of the same phenomena**

WE said that languages are inflationary, so there are multiple perspectives of any formalism of mathematical physics. They will respond mostly to the four essential components aforementioned – a wave, field, particle and scalar perspective, with some ad ons, such as relativity to account for mental distortions often in the ‘lorentzian’ regions between planes scales that become deformed in its parameters.

Let us illustrate the case with the most studied of them – the gravitational force, already mentioned.

**Einstein’s Equivalence: Bidimensional mass. Dimensions of gravitational space-time.**

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: iƒ (relativity)≈ Ti (newton) <-> Se (Poisson)≈ Sp (Lagrange):

iƒ -relativity is a still formal, *informative,* description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time)

Ti- Newton is a moving vortex of Time, less detailed and more dynamic.

Se-Poisson is a potential static field of entropic motions, with a gradient-direction.

Sp- Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.

So in pure geometric terms *the orbital vortices are accelerated time-clocks of gravitational forces with a gradient, that implies an elliptic conic that drags a field of invisivible max. Spe motion, defined by a curvature-speed, which can be explained analytically in terms of motion vortices (Newton>Poison) or curvature-distances, sliced in instantaneous, simultaneous moments (Einstein).*

In that sense, it is a common mistake of Pythagorean physicists who believe God speaks only mathematics to consider that Einstein’s work on general relativity is unrelated to Newton because he uses different mathematics. Thus, Pythagorean physicists, who consider mathematics the only language of reality, think that Einstein explains a completely different view of the Universe, which invalidates totally Newton’s work. This view is wrong and leaves unexplained the very obvious fact that Newton’s description of gravitational forces works so well that it was considered an absolute truth till the twentieth century and is still used for most calculus of forces on Earth *because both are based on the same logic principle of equivalence, which in the hierarchy of science dominates over the different detailed mathematical descriptions of it. *

Moreover, it is known to the historian of physics that Newton’s equations were evolved by Poisson and Poisson was the departing point of Einstein, which is the departing point of fractal relativity, the twenty-first-century version sketched in this book. Yet the principle of equivalence between accelerations and masses is *not the departing point of Higgs and Hawking’s entropic black holes, which deny Einstein’s principles, and so regardless of their mathematical complexity, they are wrong because their logic principles are false*.

So we must consider a different view on the evolution of gravitational theory. Newton, Poisson, and Einstein’s theories are right because they describe the same *logic principle of equivalence*, with the best mathematical models available to each age. And since logic is in the hierarchy of the scientific method, superior to mathematics, from where it derives—as Gödel, Russell, and Frege proved, deducing the laws of mathematics from those of logic—what matters is to understand the logic principles of the Universe, which will then be described “in higher detail” with each new paradigm of mathematics. What this means is that as mathematics have grown in detail and precision, new physicists have applied the new mathematics and increased the detail of their calculus.

Yet the physical principles, events, and concepts that truly define the phenomenon physicists describe have not changed. So when those principles are changed by false principles as Higgs and Hawking do in mass and black hole theory, the results are false regardless of the mathematical detail they use to reinvent the Universe.

This is clearly shown in theory of mass by the three phases of evolution of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, all of which can be used to calculate trajectories of masses, because all of them follow the three legs of the scientific method. The first paradigm was Newton’s paradigm, which used a simple formula of a gravitational vortex to describe them. And they worked fine for most calculus and they are still used. Then Poisson, Lagrange, and Hamilton refined those calculi. And finally Einstein used Poisson formulation of the gravitational force and took it a step further with the use of non-Euclidean maths.

What we have done is to take Einstein’s work further by using the next age of evolution of mathematics, fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics and the laws of endophysics, which includes the limits of human perception on those equations (Galilean paradox, changes in the speed of time around black holes), which solve the problem of the uncertainty of measure introduced by the observer.

But any of those three-plus-one ages of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration are good enough to explain what mass is; and none of the quantum alternatives, despite the complexity of its maths, is truth because they deny the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, considering mass an external property given by solid particles (the Higgs) that transfer it magically to all other entities of the Universe, not an internal property of the topological structure of space-time, its accelerated, cyclical motion.

Any of those models—Newton’s forces, Einstein’s relativity, or our non-Euclidean fractal description of the two membranes of the Universe—bring enough understanding of what a mass is. Yet because Pythagorean physicists ignore the underlying logic principles that rule their equations, they believe in the mathematical model of the day and when new mathematics appears, they think the old model was totally wrong. So they thought, as Alexander Pope put it, that “God created Newton and there was light,” but when Einstein came with new maths, they threw Newton’s work as if it were a fantasy when it had worked perfectly for three centuries in calculating all kinds of motions in the Universe. Newton had embedded the same true principles in his work—the principle of equivalence between accelerations and forces, masses and motions (F=m × a).

Next, Poisson and Hamilton applied the new refined tools of differential calculus to the study of the motion of planets, which was previously described by Newton with simpler operandi. So they found out another key principle of the Universe of energy and information—the law of minimal energy, which states that any system of the Universe tries to keep its internal energy and information, follows the path that saves more energy between two points.

Then when Riemann developed non-Euclidean mathematics, Einstein applied them to the previous work of Newton, using the notation of Poisson, to find a more precise analysis of gravitational mass vortices, by making a series of “simultaneous,” present pictures of those cyclical motions and adding the influence of the gravitational membrane that underlies our world of light and electroweak masses.

We could resume the differences between the classic formulation of Newton and the modern one, considering that Newton formulated the description of the whole, and its dynamics in an extended space and time duration, while Einstein formulated the detailed topology of the vortex in each non-Euclidean point of its space and in the simultaneity of each present moment of duration.

The description of those vortices in the scale of charges and quarks can be also done with two degrees of detail, as we do here, considering them whole vortices or as the so-called QCD theory of strong forces does, in detail, considering each fractal quanta (gluon and quark) at each moment of time and aggregating them together. Yet while the whole description of quarks we shall do here is less accurate than the detailed one, brought about by quantum chromodynamics, it provides a more logical, comprehensive overview, which is the aim of this book, since all those mathematical descriptions are truth as long as they describe accurately the equivalence principle between forces and accelerations. If we compare them with a verbal description, we could say that all of them have the same core sentence, the principle of equivalence, but the description of it grows in detail. If Newton, for example, said Jesus had dark hair, Einstein refined the analysis and said Jesus had dark hair with brown touches in his forehead, and fractal relativity refines the sentence further, saying Jesus had long dark hair with brown touches on his forehead and a white stripe on his temples. But the essential concept remains: Jesus had dark hair, that is:

*All the past forces-fields of entropy energy and future particles-clocks of the Universe are accelerated motions balanced in present inertial waves.*

This principle, so stated, is what physicists dropped with a single arrow of entropy; and due to the excessive specialization of their mathematical models of enormous detail the general vision of the forest of all physical events, the equivalence principle is lost. For that reason, I have always preferred the opposite approach: to study first the forest, the principles of physics, with a limited mathematical precision, achieved by not using computers in my calculations and accepting as supreme guides the laws of the scientific method (Objectivity->Symmetric Minimalism; Linguistic Correspondence; Cyclical Experimental evidence: Œ=Mc^{2}) and the well-established principles in which previous theories were founded. And only at the end, once the forest is mapped, I have considered some of its specific trees in more detail.

It is thus the comprehension of the principles of equivalence between the forces of the Universe and the two types of accelerations (F=m × a) and its invariance under change of position or scale in the Universe, not the mathematical details that casts further light on the meaning of mass and charges in the Universe.

Let us then summarize so far the meaning of that principle in Newton and Einstein’s work. Newton defined that principle with a simple formula: F= m × a; that is, the forces of the Universe are made of two elements, which we must consider to be both accelerated motions. Yet since we only know two types of accelerated motions, lineal acceleration (*a*) and vortices of cyclical acceleration (V × radius=k), masses should be curved, accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

This was Einstein’s view. It led him to formulate with Riemannian tensors the four-dimensional space-time structures of gravitation and masses, measuring the structure of space under that principle in a simultaneous moment of time. Thus, he made still pictures in which we can gauge the curvature of the vortex to its finest detail, adding smaller corrections to the whole dynamic Newtonian view.

Thus, Einstein just made a more detailed analysis of Newton’s vortices of mass, turning around the sun, using Riemannian geometries and the concept of simultaneous present time. We could say in a way that he made a more precise picture, a still present photograph of the spatial form of those vortices, but the essential truth, the principle of equivalence between forces and acceleration remains the same from Newton to Einstein to fractal relativity. And so it is that principle and not the evolving mathematics of any of those three models what we have to consider in detail to fully grasp the essence of all the forces of the Universe. What fractal relativity does is to add the advances on theory of information, to go even further, respecting the work of those pioneers and founding fathers.

Now as we advance through different systems of physics we will realize that those 4 views are common to all of them, albeit, some have a better use than others. Of them the most all-encompassing one is the Lagrangian Hamiltonian as it is the vision of the whole time worldview of the entity (described with the peculiar concept of energy≈ time in physics, as it should distinguish ALWAYS potential, informative and kinetic energy momentum, as it does in the detailed analysis of its quanta, the scale angular and lineal momentum. So we shall before going into those studies make an analysis of the meaning of magnitudes and conservation laws to fully graph them in terms of T.Œ.

This of course does not mean the others do not work, but as a general rule, far away perception observes wholes (you do not see the hairs of your friend coming down the road but its head and before that its whole, so the Whole –energy worldview and the head – Tƒ element, in this case Newton and Hamilton – are by far the most widely used. And for that reason we have used the Newtonian easiest perspective that comes first – the head in motion that is talking so to speak – to unify forces. In 4th line we will make copious use of the other 3.

**Singularities <> Potentials, vs. wave<fields**

Before we consider further elements it must be noticed that the fundamental past-future-past relationship of singularities is with potentials, while waves are present forms that are ‘pegged’ closely to the substrate they mold, so as in biology we tal of female waves dominant in present, 1,2,3D iterative, liquid reproductive states, and males as past-future head/limbs solid/gaseous, mind/entropic 5-4 dimensional beings, the same concept of T.œ applies to physical systems, once we understand fully the meaning of each dimension, its superoganic components, geometries, topologies and symmetries.

This means singularities’ ternary role is as a perceptive mind, as a feeding attractive vortex that ‘destroys’/feeds on potential quanta and as asocial element that ‘coordinates’ with other similar beings networks to create even larger wholes. Those are the 3 ternary roles of particles in any scale similar to those of heads and males in biological systems.

**singularities as emitters of dark entropy: faster than light decelerating neutrinos.**

Of all the themes involved in the duality particle/potential, there is the theme of a black hole, center of a galaxy, whose event horizon turns at c-speed, so it must keep accelerating and indeed it shows to do show in a KER METRIC rotary black hole in its perpendicular axis, which therefore will produce as *the light and matter swallowed collapses and fast evolves into heavier quarks, which should also rotate faster than light (bc-dark atom, top quarks in the center). So what happens here is that while nothing can go faster than light in the ud-light space-time outside the event horizon, inside all goes faster than light rotating and finally expelling Higgs or tau neutrinos as faster than light waves. While our beta-decay slower rotational quarks will produce electron neutrinos slower than light. This is the barrier that is not crossed, reason why we hardly see tau neutrinos. Then this flow decelerates as it moves faster than light between galaxies, and also tires light when traversing mounting them.*

Why this is not explored has to do with the difficulties physicists have with negative square imaginary numbers. The question of the negative number and the square root solutions, seems indeed to be one of the less ‘understood’ in mathematical physics, and tells more of the inflexibility of the human brain in its one-dimensional view of time and space than of the capacity of mathematics to mirror reality. Indeed, in mathematical physics we always obtain two ± solutions, *and they do reflect real forms of nature, but then the physicist gets scared because it lacks proper conceptual definitions of ‘energy’, ‘mass’ and so on.*

Mathematically, the Higgs field has imaginary mass and is therefore a tachyonic field. While tachyons (particles that move faster than light) are a purely hypothetical concept, fields with imaginary mass have come to play an important role in modern physics. And the answer is obvious, in the same manner a wave group speed is lower than the wave envelop, particles are always slower but the field which is the field of the dark world outside galaxies, equivalent to the 0 spin gluon – the wave CAN perfectly go faster than light and that is all what it means an imaginary mass, *or rather an imaginary energy of a wave-state for a field:*

Yet the taboo of ill-understod imaginary numbers and tachyon speeds is quite funny silly but absolute among non-conceptual physicists. So the negative solutions are either discharged, normalised or denied; and *this has become the fundamental problem to understand the ∆±4 dark world scale beyond galaxies.*

Negative energy and negative mass ARE NOT magic, but merely INVERSE TIME ARROWS, which means inverse time motions. If mass is an arrow or future vortex of information, negative mass is its inverse arrow; but alas, as *mass is by definition attractive, negative mass does NOT exist, and indeed, if we see the equation, when a tachyon field, makes the denominator negative (1-v2>c/C2<0), we cannot JUST put the negative above, but we can move the denominator to the left, and then we have IMAGINARY ENERGY.*

The importance of NOT twisting mathematical equations which requires a better understanding of what is a allowed in an =, actually ≈, <≈> operandi of similarity NOT equality is very important to discharge all those nuisances. So what does exist is negative energy, meaning as energy is s wave moving state, tachyon ‘fields’, as the Higgs, NOT tachyon particles/masses.

Then comes the choices, as in the previous equation where we must choose either negative mass or negative energy. We have explained the obvious about mass. A negative mass is an inverse arrow of entropy. And so it is NOT a mass, as we have only attractive masses. Point. Now, regarding the negative symbols there for imaginary mass and tachyon speed, the answer is that particles are stop states, waves are moving states, thus particles do not travel faster than light but waves do, so what kind of particle is actually a wave? One, the neutrino, which plays in the ‘galaxy atom’ the role of the gluon in the atom galaxy with its 3 waves interacting with each other (reason why both symmetric forces, strong and gravitation are similar, attractive only). In that regard, the key to all this is to understand imaginary numbers and the symmetries between ±, attractive repulsive forces, beyond the very limited conceptual understanding today.

*If you assume tachyons exist, then special relativity also requires that they have imaginary energy (not mass; you don’t move up the negative symbol in a similarity equation but left). Tachyons were originally proposed before we had a solid understanding of quantum theory,* but does not forbid it. Physicists say it is impossible because they do not understand imaginary numbers. It merely means a topological inversion from information to entropy from cyclical to lineal from positive to negative, from life particle to death antiparticle and so on. What we both agree is that particles do NOT move faster than light, only in wave states.

And this agrees also with negative energy NOT masses. The mathematics of quantum theory is now very clear, so it is relatively straightforward to plug an imaginary mass into the equations to see what happens. When you do that and look closely the “particle” aspect of the quantum field actually travels slower than light. So what started as an idea for particles to move faster than light turns out to be something that moves slower than light. And ultimately it is a question on how much information the system carries in its stop state as a particle, vs. how much time it stays in motion as a way. Neutrinos carry less information than light, ergo stay in particle stay less time, ergo are less perceived, ergo in its wave state are more time at faster than light, and this is shown specially when coming from intergalactic sources (which is the trajectory faster than light). But faster than light neutrinos are only so as waves, and only because the c-speed is a barrier you cannot cross, when emitted as waves of ‘tau neutrinos’ in black hole top quark stars through the axis; which likely will produce a 0 scalar higgs field one axis and a 2 neutrino graviton field the other axis. But all this needs very serous maths to convince the ‘pro’ and so we shall keep it whenever we finish the third row.

**The ternary roles of vortices in terms of the fifth dimension.**

A FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of 5D³ IS THE TERNARY PRINCIPLE applied to the roles systems command, and this is specially truth of the informative singularities, the mind=membrains that control the system. And as such they command with its dual singularity-membrain the rule of the system, as proteins and DNA nuclei do in cells. So do strangelet halos and black hole singularities in galaxies, and electronic covers and nuclei in atoms. And they will as such perform the 3 primary actions of entropic feeding, its inverse informative perception and its reproductive ST-present actions. As such we can study those ternary actions in organic, synoptic biological terms or in mathematical ones, through algebraic equations as physicists do, with its equation where the ‘3 numbers’/constants of those 3 functions, the phi number of reproduction, the pi number of information and the e number of feeding and death (exponential decay, which brings exponential growth to the predator entity) play a key role (we shall deal with imaginary numbers elsewhere):

INDEED, The mathematical depiction of those 3 primary actions of all systems of Nature take place Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.

As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time arrows. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5D planes.

**INFORMATION – πeyes**

This is little understood since for so much love of maths, as physicists do not try to match reality and maths, they miss what is important and not on the inflationary equations of maths. Two simple proofs on how much more enlightening is to refer maths to reality all the time to explain its equations:

e+e/10=3, which shows why the exponential function is the most perfect form of social evolution as ten is the perfect tetraktys form, with 3 entropic elements, 3 energetic element, 3 informative elements and the central 10th communicating them as the singularity of growing scales – reason also why the triangle is the most perfect, resistant form in space – the pythagorean perfect number when mathematical ‘things’ were simpler and easier to relate as a mirror-language to reality.

In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark matter-membrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational space-time), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of space-time. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi-3 leaves o.14 apertures, which *become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi **perimeter:*

π-3=0.14/π-perimeter=4%.

So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a pi-cycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.

We call the ideal holes in the membrane of a system, call it pores or eyes, or ‘holes’ in the strangelet halo that allow *only part of the light that comes to the galaxy to enter, πeyes.*

*As we cannot see through them, neither we can see the strangelet halo of dark matter, it is just an extension of the Witten hypothesis, but natural to the symmetries of scales, latter studied in more detail. Ultimately all systems do have dark spaces, including human eyes.*

In the graph, the ideal πeye RANGE changes with species, as form change, but likely applies to the physical systems of bidimensional space (galactic disks) as one of the possible hypothesis on dark matter brought about by 5D³. Perception is always limited, linguistic – a mirror of the whole, but languages change on their ability to portrait the laws of ∆st

*Yet likely as in any other electronic /atomic system of the lower ∆-3 scale, symmetric to it, the galaxy hides part of the complex universe and ultimately regardless of the exact veracity of the πeye hypothesis, huge regions of reality do NOT interact with our world either because they are beyond an ∆-discontinuum, or a T-cyclical membrane. *

‘Only the Universe has all the information about itself’ Haldane.

** UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS**

All this said the ratios that matter to understand reality are density of information, t/s, momentum or speed of reproduction of information in present space, sx t and s/t, entropic speed obviously the inverse to t/s.

Universal constants fix each frozen species of the Universe in a point of balance between its Tif and spe ratios which makes the species efficient and explains its survival. As such they are the quantitative values that define species. Some seem enormously general because they belong to species so huge, in the nested fractal Universe that wherever we look at them from our perspective they seem absolute (G c speed h-planck Ke, etc. the so called Universal constants which merely are the vital constants of the larger scales of the Universe):

We have to differentiate in that sense 3 kind of constants:

**∆§** constants of scale, h, k, v (c) give us a ratio of social evolution between scales.

**ð C**urvature constants, ke, Gm, gΛ gives us the size curvature and speed in the border of the scales.

**$: **Its inverse giving us the potential of the field as negative function: V=-gm/x and so on.

Since ð = – S in the topological symmetry unlike in the scale symmetry whereas T x S = K; = t=s/k

**The main** constants of a system are divided into active magnitudes, vital internal constants and universal external constants: Å.V.U.C.

The study of the quantitative constants and hence the algebraic equations of the being, which is fundamental to physics. We study the main proportional ratios between the Sp-ST-Tiƒ, elements of the Generator Equation, internally, the vital constants of a system, externally the Universal constants of its world, both connected by the active magnitude or value of the being

Thus 3 are the types of parameters and equations related to the ternary rule of subdivision of those Universal constants:

**– 1.Å:**__Åctive Magnitude (å), is ultimately the singularity @monad, @cting and while often in mathematical physics is just a scalar number__ to define the whole its roles are multiple. It is the charge of a molecule, the rest mass of a cosmic body, the Z-number of an atom, for the 3 physical ∆±1 scales in its static state.

But obviously for each species and each study is diverse. For example, in America, where the language of valuation is money, this is the ‘credit number’ or fortune of each citizen – all other things dependent on this. And generally as the example shows, this active magnitude is connected to the Œ-isomorphism of the language of value of the world in which the being is: IT IS ITS FACE VALUE, its Tiƒ value in the parameter of information of the larger world. The dominant value, naked. And also the fundamental element of survival (as systems tend to be in balance, S=T, by defining Tiƒ, we often define the Sp x Tiƒ metric existential force of the being).

In the cosmological realm, your mass defines your survival, in a molecule your charge-valence, in an economic society your ‘money’. In a genetic society your ‘surname’. And of this *always the fractal is aware. In the old times, when someone asked you what you were, or rather who you were, you said your kinship, name or tribe, in the modern world you say your profession (as it would be a bit rude on the sense of ‘balance’ to state your wealth, but this is implied by the profession’s salary). So this is the key constant, ∆-1Tiƒ put often in relationship to the total amount of the world, so it is also in physics, the Potential magnitude, the ratio between the Å-ctive magnitude of the being and the total value of the field-world below or above. *

Now again we must realize that the languages of God are infinite, meaning that while no physicist would perhaps accept that Mass and Surname are similar concepts they are both å-ctive magnitudes of the language of cosmology and the language of genetic societies that *resume the value of the being for the whole system, and its master-god, the black hole origin of cosmic mass and the king, master of the tribal nation. So again, the closer your parameter is to that of the central element of the ∆+1 hierarchy, the more value you have, the closer you will be seated at the side of ‘God’ (the Max. Tiƒ point of your ∆+1 world is the definition of God).*

Now associated to this according to duality principles (according to the duality, motion-static form, and | vs. O-motions) we can talk of other key parameters, related to moving active magnitudes, performing | or O cycles. Hence in physics it is the Lorentz Force of a charged molecule or particle (subdivided into its charge and magnetic motions), the momentum of a mass (subdivided in |-lineal momentum and O-angular momentum).

And so happens for particle parameters, in which the quantum numbers perform the same conceptual tasks, further subdivided into 2 x 2 numbers (principal for lineal kinetic energy, secondary for angular momentum, being the spin number for perception and reproduction and the magnetic number for social evolution).

Thus we can see now that departing from an active magnitude, *we can start to find all kind of combined parameters and active constants, once we give motion to the active magnitude and put it to task, performing its 5 canonical actions that give ‘living purpose’ to the being. *

**-2,3,4 ‘V’:** Next we consider a set of 3 ‘Vital Constants’ internal to the being, which relate Tƒ and Sp, and hence are the main parameters of fields-limbs/body-waves and particles-heads.

They write in terms of Tiƒ=1/T, cyclical time or frequency: the inverse of period-duration, T. So we write 2 formats, the classic T- duration equation; and the inverse Tiƒ -frequency equation, which is the one T.Œ uses.

-Se/Tƒ=SxT = density of reproduction of energy And its inverse:

-Tƒ/Se= 1/TxS: density of reproduction of information; or speed of reproduction of the Œ- form in a lower scale (quite obvious for waves, S=T, not so evident for particle-field systems, S>T)

It again does have different jargons in physics, as *most parameters of the fractal,* bidimensional Universe are squares, while in lineal physics, they tend to use one-dimensional parameters. For example, the density of information is closely related to curvature, which in lineal physics at each point of a line is defined to be 1/r, where r is the radius of the osculating, or “kissing,” circle that best approximates the line at the given point. This for the explorer of physical equations is one of the fundamental, albeit cumbersome corrections of most physics, to give it a focused mirror: the transformation of parameters to the proper dimensions of time and space.

Another example is Maxwell’s equation of light speed, c=1√µxe, which in the bidimensional Universe must be therefore squared, to give us the fundamental parameter, c^{2} = 1/µ(sp) x e (Tiƒ). Alas (-; we does have here by the simple procedure of applying the general concepts of T.Œ to a physical formula the understanding of 3 fundamental parameters, µ, the magnetic constant that defines µ as the quanta of energy of the electromagnetic space, eo, the electric constant, which defines it as the informative parameter (or in its inverse lineal time concept, as Ke, the coulomb constant of force of the electromagnetic field), and finally c2, the density of information of light space, which as it happens comes also in a fundamental equation, E=Mc2, or E(sp) < C2 (Tƒ/Sp) > M (Tƒ), which simply states that an entropic field of space-time light, becomes converted into a cyclical vortex of time or mass, through the ratio of conversion of ‘entropy into information’ of our Universe. And needless to say since we have discovered the meaning of µ, eo, k and M and c2, it will be easy to understand as Ke and G are closely related the meaning of G, when we study the Œ isomorphism of physical systems and define charges and masses unifying them, as the two time vortices of information of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales.

Now we can relate also those terms, µ and eo to the normal speed of material waves (concepts of tension and mass of the string that ‘waves’), when dealing with our world.

And all this led us to the understanding of speed of information transmission. It is the most often used constant of the Universe, c-speed, albeit eliminating *the informative parameter of the Tiƒ element, and making it lineal, which we will show to be determinant to misunderstand speed. Since ultimately speed is reproduction of information along a path of motion on a lower, ∆-1 scale. So physicists come to realize that for exampled the c-speed limit is NOT one of mere locomotion but one of ‘reproduction of information and transmission of information’ along the Universe.*

We shall obtain wondrous results as the ∞ relative speed of gravitation, which carries no information or ‘action at distance’, but does carry energy-motion, that is locates forms in space. Why? Simple, we are talking of a density of reproduction of energy NOT of information, carried by the gravitational force. And this process SxT≈Se/Tiƒ= K/o=∞ is a pure action at distance.

The consequences of this will be daring in all the conceptual analysis of all the scales of reality, determining the inverse arrows of the 5^{th} dimension: the larger scales of gravitational forces who do NOT carry internal information are however able to control externally and locate with perfect motions all its lower scales. So when you move your hand, all your lower scales ‘act at distance’ in simultaneity, with infinite synchronicity. But Information does have limits of speed to code and reproduce its forms, in other systems, so genetic informative preproduction is far slower. We say that motion from upper to lower scales carries no information except the motion-distance itself and it is synchronic with no loss of order (entropy in the old jargon), and vice versa, information from lower to upper scales reproduces with no loss (entropy), but has a limited speed.

Or in even more profound metaphysical terms, we say that ‘present’ space co-existence is proper of upper motion scales, the larger spatial action at distance relative pure space motions with no time, but information reproduction implies ‘expenditure of time’, reason why indeed time and information are so closely related, and space and no-time processes of motion and expansion of space are also closely related. From these facts we do obtain the equation of death by entropic expansion in space in no time: Death = max. Sp x Min. T (death happens in a single time quanta) and its inverse, life arrow, Life=Max. Tiƒ x Min. Sp. Life happens in a long time but consumes little information and happens in systems in relative rest motion, specially when the fetus evolves.

Thus we do have the reproduction of energy and the reproduction of information as two different parameters, quite ill-understood in the fog of modern physics (but hinted at in many comments and equations).

– So now we do have the 3^{rd} fundamental physical parameter: Se x Tƒ=S/T, or existential force-potency of the being, all related concepts which basically give us the capacity of the system to interact efficiently with the outer world. I like to call it the Predator Force, as it determines who wins in fights for existence of any kind of species.

In that sense, in biology means to have a perfect head and a perfect body, which defines the top predator. In physics it is often similar to the momentum when we take Tƒ as the active magnitude, and Sp, and the ‘distance-lineal speed’ of the being. And indeed the physical system with maximal momentum survives better in collisions, so black holes that traverse stars with less momentum devour them.

Now those 3 constants are maximized in the ages of the being, in youth, the Maximal spatial value, in old age the maximal density of information, in the mature, adult age, the balanced existential force which gives us the reproductive age of the being, dominating its environment where it seeds its offspring. In physics, they are the ‘stationary points’ of its young, energetic, Max Se, adult Se=Tƒ and max. Tiƒ, ‘stationary points’ of its world cycle or ‘Hamiltonian’ (in physical system) the most important in time.

In physics this set of 3 laws are tremendously important for each species, and for a full description of the system, they must be coupled with the 3 ‘Universal Constants’ of the larger ∆±|2| worlds in which the being exist.

**– UC,** so those are the Universal constants, in which the external actions of the being will be displayed, which therefore will come constantly in our equations. In physics, as we are thermodynamic ∆-beings sandwiched between the ∆-1 atomic and ∆+1 galactic gravitational world, those essential constants of the larger and smaller world that come in almost all the equations of interaction between thermodynamic man and reality are graphed in the next picture, as functions of Time and space, and its integrals of Energy, AND BELOW in the Universal Units, void of human anthropomorphism (Planck Units):

Now to fully understand the meaning of physical equations, before its thorough study through its different scales, we must understand the previous equations and its meaning, as they are void of human interference in its measure, and further on, show that instead of the 3 human ‘parameters’, mass, length and time of current physics, all can be studied with the 3 equivalent but not equal parameters of the Universe, G for mass, c for length and h for time.

So this is the first thing the system reveals to us. In the Universe time is cyclical and measured through angular momentum, of which the simplest unit is h; the constant of universal information, in the Universe space is measure with speed (space in motion), whose fundamental unit is c-speed, the constant of universal space. And so it only rest to consider that in the Universe, the 3^{rd} element which is the active magnitude of the scalar 5D being is measured with the relative unit of curvature/force/5D metric value, which in the Universe is G and Ke in the equivalent lower scale of reality, and in the remaining thermodynamic scale, H-Boltzmann, the entropy unit. And this transversal constants of the 5^{th} dimension close therefore the fundamental units of realty from where all others can be derived. (whereas 1/4πeo=Ke is the unit that should be used).

No other constant is fundamental to the Universe, and those are also enough constants to express in 5D physics all what exists, regardless of the specific world (human physics) that observe that Universe.

So the first and obvious truth we observe is the difference between 5D fractal space-time and the human continuous single still space and single time clock of the Universe, and its single scale.

As we have already considered the meaning of h, G and c in certain depth in the 0th and 4^{th} isomorphisms – the actions of physical systems, it is easy now consider a few more details, on the difference between human perceptions and Universal perceptions of the 2 parameters of reality, Tƒ and Sp, Let us be clear, the Planck units, subject to much speculation are REAL. They are the maximal and minimal quanta of different scales of reality, such as a new scale quanta is made of a social gathering of smaller quanta, regarding time clocks that slow down or accelerate in frequency and space units that grow and diminish in size, and its ratios that define the different planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

So as we advance in the III part of this section, studying each scale we will consider in more detail the consequences of this insight – that space has a fundamental constant c, information, h (a quanta of time) or h/2π, a ‘radius’ or bit of the minimal quanta of information, and its combinations into space-time clock-like vortices (M g, Q k), vary with the scale of the 5^{th} dimension we study.

**Bidimensionality and tridimensional of the constants of nature and its physical equations.**

Now when considering a system we can establish a minimum of parameters to describe them. If the system is a ‘boson’ wave of communication, normally two dimensions/parameters are enough, but when the system is a particle of full time worldcycles, we need 3 parameters, or 3 axis of the mind-point. The understood of this essential difference between bosons and fermions in physics is not well understood, but can be explained easily with spins. The 1 spin of the boson wave merely means that spin is measured as a full motion of the wave cycle, it is not in a stop position as the quantised ‘angular momentum-spins’ of particles in which they act more as a window of perception from the radian angle pov of the singularity.

BOSON ARE BIDIMENSIONAL WAVES between tridimensional fermions, with a fixed position in relative singularity time-zero at its center, par tile form.

The way this basic geometries are then expressed by mathematical physics requires a detailed adaptation to the higher truths of topological space-time.

The next obvious truth of the Natural Units of speed, angular momentum and 5D Curvature/Contraction (the ultimate meaning of G and Ke) is that all those equations are roots, hence, the magnitudes are bidimensional, meaning they are defined by 2 parameters, to eliminate the root, *as the holographic principle expects. Length is an area; mass and charge, the action of curving ‘together’, with 2 poles, an extension of space, ‘travelling through the 5th dimension, on the arrow of increasing motion and decreasing extension; shrinking, warping the aerolar space-time between them; and Lineal Time is similar to length only that it has an added dimension of space (c2).*

Further on this bidimensionality maximises the equality of the two poles, Max. SxT->S=T. So two systems attract more the more equal their distribution of masses is. Systems thus naturally tend to balance and equilibrium.

The key metrics: h c/G

Next we observe on those equations, an interesting result, h, is always above, and it multiplies c curved by G, or it disentangles G, opened by c, which acting as the relative volume of space, can have different potencies. So basically we are talking of 2 kind of events:

Tiƒ (h) x c/G (ST/Sp) or Tiƒ (h) x G/C (Sp/ST)

Now we know by standard physics that G is (3rd Kepler’s law) proportional to r³/T²; so it is a transformation of a res extensa, a volume of static space into a bidimensional time clock, which is what we indeed see the 2 masses doing, as if they were throwing a ‘net’ to fish the micro-quanta of space-time together.

So the immediate interpretation of the previous ratios is that a length and a time duration are entropic events where curvature, G is expanded, and vice versa, a curvature G, or charge or temperature, with its different modes of cyclical vibration, packs expansive, electromagnetic radiation into informative quanta. So mass and charge are informative, length and duration, entropic.

This leads since in our scale of existence we do not operate on G, c and H constants but temperature

Now, once the 5 key isomorphisms of Reality are studied in detail, It is left to apply to that generator equation the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of that equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Se: informative densities, Se/Tƒ: energy densities and Se=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Se: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: ∆-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; ∆+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of the ∆-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and ∆+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metrics= SexTƒ= K, which defines the Constants of action: ∆-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

∆: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt)= E x T, which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Se/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’: ∆-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Se-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

In that regard we can establish as the fundamental parameters of the Human World, the constants of energy density of the quantum and thermodynamic fields, H and q, the constants of informative curvature/density, Q and G, and the constants of Present Speed, C.

Now those are the constants of the Human word, which is NOT the whole Universe. This must be clear. And certainly while in the previous article on cosmological systems we have studied further beyond the Human Universe the dark world, there is no reason why to do so in this post on the atomic and molecular matter sales of human beings.

It should be noticed that there is ONLY a constant of speed-space, c the constant of light because WE are created in a pyramid in which the minimal continuum is light space-time, from where the symmetry breaks, that is quanta evolve socially into larger systems.

Of course we do know that in the interior of atoms there are quarks and outside galaxies dark energy and dark matter, but those themes have dealt with ion the previous post, because in the ‘known known evident Universe they DO NOT PLAY ANY ROLE, they are beyond the human Universe. We are a Universe in which those are the constant that matter. Strong forces and dark energies, which are related as a Russian Doll game, in which smaller parts and larger beings come together, as it happens with smaller food and larger animals in the world (where the smallest quanta, light feeds plants, the smallest plancktons whales, the smallest krills, whale sharks, and so according to the metric of the 5^{th} dimension Min. Tƒ (food ) x Max. Se (predator) = K, in this game of nested Russian dolls from below and above, our world is reduced to:

**Constant of Energy density in the Light scale: c and H-Planck**

Now, the key to understand Nature is the duality space and time, which means at fast speeds, it is difficult to know if we observe a time form in space populations or an individual space in time sequential, reproductive motions. But fully gasping the conceptual dualities and ternary symmetries between time and space, particle-antiparticle (future-past states), field-wave-particle etc, so many times repeated in this web, it is easy to interpret in the right ways the different equations of physics. We must first look to that aim by a present space-time constant system, in each scale, which will break its symmetry in two parts, one with maximal form and other with maximal motion

The most obvious case in Planck units is c-speed, the constant of lineal space-motion, which is the product in planck units of planck time and space: C=Lp (Planck Length x Tiƒ (Planck’s angular frequency). So this means a c-speed splits into a length-distance and an angular frequency, to give us a clear cut definition of space-time of light.

This space-time of light, moreover carries a speed of reproduction of information, which can be measured in relationship to its frequency and H-planck minimal informative quanta, giving us different species of light with increasing ‘existential force’ or content of space-information which is given by the energy of the photon.

E= Hƒ. As this equation seems not to have clear limits, the varieties of space-time species of photons are enormous. That gives of course the enormous success to the light space-time that forms the substrata of all the species born in the fields of galaxies between the halo membrane and the black hole centre, the 2 limits of existence of light space-time beings. So when those beings come closer to those 0 T-formal vibration and c-speed length, they hit a limit. So the following are the constants of basic light space-time.

Constant of Present speed-distance-form or ∆-scale: Light space-time (relativity theory) is therefore constant as IT IS THE SPACE-TIME ∆-scale we are studying.

Constant of Information density in the light scale: H.

Tif: time clock: Human measure of it – the informative cyclical frequency part of the c-speed

L: distance of space in the light space-time.

**Curved into two limiting particles, charge and mass.**

Now, this C x ~~H~~ is therefore an essential new equation which defines the Universe in which we live in terms of the fundamental parameter of information and h-bar ‘Planckton’, and its speed of reproduction, c-speed. As such this c~~h~~, is the substance of which space-time beings are made. And how they are made into ternary structures, charges and masses is obvious. We must enclose, encircle and control a vital space made of c-motions and Plancktons of information (~~h).~~ And depending on the degree of curvature we make, of the size of our enclosure, we can create charges or masses (œ-isomorphism):

So if we curve it by the Constant of information density of the matter, cosmological scale, G, we obtain mass.

Now mass IS A BIG ENCLOSURE, so its unit is huge. This means that beyond renormalisation, smaller than this size of mass (Planck’s mass) have minimal effects, not worth to consider, except when we calculate the overall mass of the enclosure, in which each piece of energy and vortex of time will contribute to ‘power up’ the mass scale and its relative integrative space-time parameters.

But mass per se does not matter to the standard model of quantum particles. It is about the cosmological model of black holes. Within those particles mass then must be considered as the emergence residual force coming out of the strong force of quarks and the particle-antiparticle moment of death of a meson, which gives up part of its total energy in that moment of death (seen as a double chirality that closes a circle), through the Dirac’s equation of particle-antiparticle conjugate, to surface in the larger mass enclosure. Mass also absorbs energy from thermodynamic systems, cooling them down, and in this case we must consider the parameters of pressure, positive mass, vs. temperature, negative mass (entropic expansive motion) and how the mass ‘enclosure’ absorbs rotary motion from them.

Tif: As a time clock mass therefore is defined with a frequency of rotation, which is proportional to the mass attractive power.

In small particles this factor is residual except in the heaviest mass-particles, the BCT family of the top quark, which however is outside our Universe, probably as the atoms of black holes.

So how mass emerges from that curvature of hc? The equation it is in fact a product mass, M m, hence we must consider that to establish a mass field, and an enclosure, two attractive masses and in a Newtonian vortex-equation might appear (the same with charges), and then they will distort and encircle all what it is in that space-time hc reality, bending it by a G-factor to create the mass enclosure, and emerge as a new plane of existence, in which surface the parameters of temperature and radiation (internal) will have been subdued by the emergence of the factor of mass-enclosure.

Let us then consider briefly the meaning of momentum and energy and its conservation laws which ultimately mean the conservation of the 5^{th} dimension.

**The Universe and its clocks of time and quanta of space. The creative process: breaking of constant space-time symmetries.**

We arrive now to a theme that physicists will find more up to their alley – as it is in great measure quantitative – the meaning of Universal constants, which are ratios between space and time parameters of each scale of the Universe that define and differentiate its species.

to the first form of space and first expression of the ∆-gravitational scale symmetry is c-speed.

In the translation of 4D physics to 5 D Physics, we start from c-speed, the constant, then we multiply C= Sp x Tiƒ = Length x Angular frequency (in Planck Units).

On the other hand the principle of relativity translates into the principle of Galileo the gal ilea paradox: all moves and has form at the same time.

Light therefore splits into space-distance, and time-frequency, and its constancy in 4D is particular case of the Sp x Tiƒ constancy of the 5th dimension.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= Sp x Tƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : Sp x Tƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency:

*Now we shall call the 3 combinations of space-space fields, of time time particles and of space time waves.*

So light space-time is the wave state or present constant background in which the evolution of human information took place. It is the ultimate constant frame of reference of mankind, and this needs to understand the difficult evolution of those concepts from absolute cartesian newtonian spacetime into relational einsteinean light space-time.

**Spe pov on motion: Pacman Universe. Feeding.**

On the other hand the inverse ‘arrow’ of a singularity of attractive information is the use of the pixels it absorbs from a force, not as information but as energy. Again we can bring for good homology analysis the duality of plants and animals that use as energy or information the same ‘force’, light. In the case of galaxies the force involved should be the ∆-4 scale of gravitation… But the concept is roughly the same: stars and planets then ‘are’ gravitational plants and black holes gravitational animals.

We state that motion is reproduction of a form in an adjacent part of space. But as reproduction requires entropy-motion imprinted by the inner form of the being it also requires feeding. Thus another ‘angle’ to observe motion from an $pe-Pov is that of pacman Universe… *as all motions require the feeding in a field of ∆-1 particles, exploded entropically, by the vortex that advances. *This which was an earlier and only rational explanation of ‘why’ fields attract and why astrophysical systems are elliptical, as they have *2 focus of relative ‘net’ feeding.*

**Social forces: waving scales through force ‘communication’ and ‘herd feeding’.**

Finally to notice that all force is dual so as in the graph above light might be used to feed in plants to perceive in animals, the forces of ‘each scale’ (latter analysed) must have both roles, serving as communicators for further social evolution in ‘smooth’ not colliding perpendicular approaches – as in the orbits of planets, among similar forms (quasi-circular), and serving as feeding systems, which indeed is the role of the angular momentum and aerolar second law of kepler – the planets ‘wave-sinus distribution’ Titus laws, scan both the likely gravitational waves of the central black hole of the ‘galactic organism – gala cell’ for the sun, acting as antena receptors, but also use the attractive power of the sun over the quantum potential of the dark world over which they galaxy travels to ‘absorb’ quanta *likely neutrino at faster than light, in its ‘paradoxical informative role’ as opposed to the ‘expansive, decelerating neutrinos of the entropic role’ when they are ‘expelled from the sun’ Beta decay process.*

Yet as the duality of roles of neutrinos in its implosive, tachyon, gravitational non-local untested and entropic, decelerating sub-c speed role is well beyond this introduction, we shall leave the details like that and make an organic feeding analysis of the force netting (which of course will be completely disregarded by the ego paradox of the humind, only sentient, living species of the Universe by ‘decree’, LOL).

Indeed, a field of forces between two particles merely means that when two ‘particles attract, they form an elliptical dual ‘net’ and they move ‘feeding’ on the ∆-1 field. While a single vortex, will create a spherical field (as perceived by us), attracting with its curved spiral geometry the field particles, ‘reducing the field’ which seems to be an attractive process. And the faster it turns, the more it will feed. Thus as the mass increases the parallel tempo of the feeding pi-mouth increases. In the next graph we show both cases:

In the graph a generic picture for any process of feeding by an opening mouth can also account obviously to the motion of the being which as the pi cycle enlarges moves ahead on the absorbed lower scale – a process to explain gravitational motion, which appeared in earlier literature and was retaken and wrongly discharged by Feynman: when 2 masses ally they will start forming topological ‘nets’, in which the smaller ‘point’ acts as the ‘herder’ of the larger system, entering an orbital path, *becoming the membrane which closes the vital space-time of the system. *

*And it does not need to be a perfect membrane (as the cell protein) but a mobile, fast one (as a dog herding a sheeple flock; or a magnetic field herding electrons).*

In that sense, to be more precise is more convenient to consider then for the analysis of entropic feeding of a time vortex over a motion field, instead of cc, its Maxwell’s equivalent, k/µ (where k is a compact constant of curvature, which *defines as distance=motion, the speed and strength of the constant membrane of the attractive field,* over the magnetic constant of vacuum, which *defines the smaller ∆-1 ‘quanta’ that feeds the electromagnetic field*) as those are the quanta the system feeds on.

**VITAL S=T DIMENSIONS**

‘Each point is a world in itself’. Leibniz

We cannot be by all means exhaustive, so we shall just as usual start with some classic work of pioneers in the understanding of physics in geometric ways, enlightened with ∆ST and then move onto more specific discoveries of ∆ST applied to the usual concepts of geometrical physics: the canonical curves of fields and forces, the vectorial calculus, the holographic principle, the co-ordinates systems and so on…

**One dimension. **

A FRACTAL POINT is considered to have ‘one dimension’, meaning it has volume and in the ∆+1 plane where we measure, it has a role as a moving point in a cycle of its larger ∆+1 world, so it appears to us, either as a point with volume or a moving point (which has less density as it is trans-forming information into a reproductive movie wave – ultimate reason of some paradoxes of relativity of motion).

So we define different ‘dimensions for the elements of fractal non-Euclidean geometry’:

- Fractal points have a minimal 1 dimension, when perceived (by definition if not perceived they don’t have a dimension). This only string theory in physics understands, giving to each point a lineal inner dimension. It is a good approach for formal work but we want to be more precise. So we shall define the non-E five postulates of non-euclidean geometry first, and consider that each point when seen in detail is a whole super organism of 10 dimensions,
*but as a whole membrain in the upper scale it appears to us, and works as an active entity in motion, as a one dimensional point with motion and an internal form we do not perceive.*

So the point *will either be a static point with an inner dimension that connects it to the lower ∆-1 scales (akin to the concept of string geometry), or a ‘point-particle’, that moves tracing a cycle in a larger ∆+1 world, and we shall see it as a line in motion also with a dimension.*

2.Lines are waves with 2 dimensions, as light or any other form able to communicate information.

3.Planes are topological networks, which *require three lines to define it and so they have 3×2=6 space and time dimensions (3st dimensions).*

Planes are thus the spatial view of a superorganism with 3 entropic, informative and iterative-energetic networks; which in turn can be observed as a larger whole, unit-point of the new ‘scaling’ which starts afresh – hence the need for a fifth postulate which is akin to the first (definition of a point) but from the internal point of view (as a point with volume), showing how vital geometry is also cyclical, and refers to the geometric process of growth of scales between ‘two ∆±1 planes’.

*It is then essential to consider the less understood and more important of the axioms of Euclid, the definition of similarity between two fractal points or planes which determine its behaviour as only those forms who understand each other’s gauging language can herd and collaborate together in parallel, otherwise different forms with different languages will use each other in darwinian events of perpendicular hunting.*

So this darwinian vs. loving duality IS ESSENTIAL TO THE INVERTED BEHAVIOR OF THE FOURTH AND FIFTH DIMENSIONS OF ENTROPY AND SOCIAL EVOLUTION, and it is ruled by the i-logic laws of congruence=similarity of the 3rd NON-E POSTULATE, the most important and less understood of geometry, concerning the nature of parallelism and perpendicularity.

This also introduces the answer to questions of the type – where it is the fifth dimension, how the dimensional scales of the Universe grow?

Answer in a cyclical manner as *membranes-enclosures of a previous open ball; so layer upon layer of a spherical 1-dimensional form, the inner parts grow; and/or as a reproductive wave, the point-particle moves and creates in a new scale, a new game of social growth.*

**THE CREATION OF DIMENSIONS**

How dimensions are created? The scalar dimensions, as we have shown by social evolution in ternary and decametric scales.

Then there is the erasing of the fifth dimension by the fourth dimension of entropic death which is inverse.

But in a relative present of |-motion x O-information = ø-body waves, there is also transformations of one dimension of lineal form into one cyclical form, or one formal dimension of space into the equivalent dimension of time.

For example, a mind-‘Aristotelian God’ which doing his ‘thing’ can stop the energy moving around in a disk of accelerated vortex-time speed, expanding a motion into stillness, now stored in a ternary volume of space, or viceversa, quench a height dimension of form into an accelerated bidimensional disk:

*A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space.*

Above we show how dimensions of distance can become dimensions of motions. So the contraction of a 3rd entropic volume becomes a bidimensional accelerated space vortex and vice versa.

**Two Dimensions. The holographic principle**

The paradox of galileo shows the bidimensionality of time information and entropy space, and the equivalence between a motion in time, a distance in space, a frequency and a population, such as:

Space = ∑ T, that is distance = λ ƒ, whereas a quanta of space is multiplied by a frequency in time.

A second fascinating theme of topological physics, with the ad ons of GST is the understanding of why *almost every physical equation and system can be written in bidimensional layers. We already explained it. *Even Relativity in the so called ADM formalism, which is its natural Hamiltonian formulation (another huge element explained better in GST) is bidimensional.

We are not treating anywhere the complex AMD formalism. I have given up the initial intention of reordering 30 years of research and aim just to put the barebones of GST in this blog before my numerous sicknesses cancel my existence (and find myself every month wanting to work less and less)… So we shall consider only the simplest of all bidimensional elements in physics, the conics.

But before the reason of all this is crystal clear. It is the holographic principle, coupled with Galileo’s px.:

*IN THE GRAPH, THE GALILEAN PARADOX:All -motion can be seen as sP-distance; all ∆-continuous ARE ALSO an ∑∆-1 fractal sum of discontinuous parts, joined by force networks. Galileo saw the Saturn’s rings and thought its was a flat continuous disk. In fact is made of ∑ point-particles turning in cyclical motions, which from far away seem a continuous ‘area’.*

The mind thus distorts perception and the whole subject of special relativity can be considered an error of the mind, and a tool to adapt reality to that mind-perception (also general relativity as its vortices of accelerated time, curve space-time only if seen from our scale, but if we enlarge their inner, larger-faster gravitational distances-motions IT WOULD LIKELY BE euclidean and as such it is likely perceived by the black hole).

In that sense in mathematical physics, the cases in which we can bring the Galilean Paradox to resolve problems, are normally on the ‘verge’ of a given space-time continuum (c-speed T≥0 in our continuum). It will also be used as a renormalisation process of elimination of infinities and zeros, when we need to consider minimalist effects of the underlying ∆-scales and its ‘stress’ in the limits of the carrying capacity of entropy of information of a plane. At that is really pedantic stuff for the initiated, which only gets ‘worked up’ the most arrogant physicists of numerology, we escape it (the infamous 0.00… deviation calculation of the g-factor in the electron, being the most famous ‘engraving’ in the tomb of his author).

The holographic principle thus defines systems of bidimensional motion and/or form together, giving birth to the 4 canonical combinations:

So reality is both motion (time, energy) or form (information, space) and always bidimensional (holographic principle):

The perfect form of spatial MOTION is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, opposed, inverse forms shape the spatial, linear, energetic bodies and cyclical, informative, memorial minds that become the complementary forms of all organic systems made of atoms of temporal energy.

Entropy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. They form all its complementary systems. In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

The 2 primary elements of the Universe, lineal entropy and cyclical form, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.

In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Entropy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.

Holographic systems are thus expressed in everything.

**10 D MODEL: S≈T SYMMETRIES & ∆±2 TRIPS**

We shall thus in the blog use mostly a simplified analysis of the 5 Dimensions and a more complex Disomorphic analysis of the 10 dimensions in a vital, organic sequential way, as the system grows from a monad of a single dimension THROUGH THE LADDER OF ISOMORPHISMS TO COMPLETE IN ITS WORLDCYCLE its final existence through all the 9 and 10 scales of social evolution (during its emergent age) and actions through planes… The astounding variety of the Universe being in variations of order, symmetries and stages of those worldcycles of topological super organisms. So we shall here briefly comment on that constant growth of the being till it reaches its zenith and then declines fast as a ‘dotard’ (:

**The simples 1, 2, 3… 4th, 5th, 6th dimensions.**

The Universe is a superoganism of 10 dimensions of symmetric space-time. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).

Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write, S=T, as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.

The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:

*Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant *∫S-T∂st=0

And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.

Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.

This is the law of balance and co-existence of reality that make humans and civilisations co-exist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms co-exists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.

Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of time-motion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time.

It can allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal being) type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of space-time.

So the simplest analysis are those in which we observe a ‘non-e point in space, a point with breath’, as a single dimension, coupled with a dimension of lineal motion, the first dimension of time.

Then we can consider holographic bidimensional entities with dimensions of form and motion:

In the graph we see systems with information and motion=time; systems with entropy and form (bidimensional space), and 4D combinations, of which the basic one is light space-time (our electronic perception of both being tuned to such ‘minimal quanta’ of our perceived reality.

Next we can consider combinations of 3 dimensions of form and 3 dimensions of space; and here we exhaust the existence of a system in single space-time continuum:

In the graph we see 6 dimensional descriptions of a space-time super organism. Now we are talking (: indeed, we can describe an enormous number of systems with 3 ‘fractal parts’ with 3 topologies in space and 3 functions in time, and as it happens since a 4Dimensional system have only 3 possible topologies, that is enough to understand the processes of topological evolution that complete our work in evolution, through 3 topological ages, dominated by each of those 3 elements, and describe a generator equation for all of them:

Γ; $pe: lineal limbs/fields of entropy <Ø-ST hyperbolic-bodywaves>O-particle/heads of information.

*All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times that ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them). So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale:*

In the graphs, we see simple, basic motions of the lowest scales of particles and waves, which move reproducing in a lower scale. Moreover modern topology describes forms always as topological networks.

So to define a single space-time continuum form we need at least two scales, that of parts and wholes which form together a topological network of any of those 3 varieties:

So when we talk of a truly transformative motion in the fifth dimension which does NOT surface back into the ∆-scale as reproductive motions and topological transformations of networks do, we *need two jumps in the fifth dimension.*

**The complex social dimensions and functions of reproduction and social evolution: 7th, 8th, 9, 10th.**

*So how then we go beyond the 3+3 topological dimensions of S≈T motion and form? The answer is the scalar ‘social dimensions’ of parts and whole, which are NON-commutative, that is different when we move from a whole to its parts of more information, than when we move upwards to a whole of more entropic motion, from a smaller part:*

*In the graph, we see that for each ‘scale, there will be a ternary system of space and time dimensions, which obey topological rules (the sphere maximises information in lesser space; the line maximises distance in minimal time; the hyperbola combines both in iterative body-waves), for a maximal of 6 dimensions in a single plane.*

*But then we can add two dimensions of space & time upwards and downwards in scale.*

*As those are ‘new dimensions’ we have the responsibility to name them. How shall we call those dimensions?*

So the 7th dimension of ‘death’ and 8th dimension of pure entropic ‘big-bang explosions’ in space, are jumps across to scales of reality. We are talking serious ‘shit’ here. Nothing of this is fancy wishful thinking. We *shall extract all the laws of nature, mathematical physics, death processes from it.*

In mathematical terms, we talk of most ‘processes of timespace’ as single derivatives and integrals, which move up and down a given scale – but in process of death back into the potential field of minimal parts, we talk *of Laplacians and Poisson double derivatives, which explode the whole from the ∆+1 mind-dimension down to the lower ∆-1 parts and this is the equation of death: Tƒ ∆+1 << ∑∑$pe ∆-1, or ∂”Tƒ=0.*

Now for the inverse dimension of social evolution, we realise that as mind singularity is actually an ∆-1 singularity point, a single individual mind of a society (its king, president or prophet), a single crystal in a matter system (the first crystal cell which commands the reproduction and social organisation of the whole macro crystal) or an atomic entity (the black hole singularity of the galaxy), and so on But IT HAS A MIND-IMAGE that transcends and emerges beyond the ∆0 entity into the ∆+1 EXTERNAL WORLD, organising socially with similar beings, the 9th and 10th dimensions of eusocial love and creation of worlds beyond the super organism, unit of the larger ∆+1 world IS also jumping to scales, from your infinitesimal neuronal-ego, through your organism into the outer world.

And this will be also the model for galaxies, where the black hole ‘DNA’ IS connected to other galaxies of the ∆+1 cosmos through dark entropy flows (bilateral jets), even if it is in fact the ‘best, densest’ possible frozen star of the ∆-1 scale.

Membrains, mind-singularities thus are also in the process of social evolution jumping two scales from its neuronal infinitesimal, past the enclosed organism its membrain closes into the larger social world; which is the super organism proper (∆-1 cell; ∆º organism, ∆+1: super organism, world, or ecosystem).

It is obvious that the dimension of ‘social growth’ is a dimension of social evolution; and we feel justified to call it:

The 5TH DIMENSION OF TIME, THE DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION, THE DIMENSION OF LOVE, AND ITS EQUIVALENT IN SPACE, THE 5TH DIMENSION OF SPACE, THE DIMENSION OF THE WHOLE, THE DIMENSION OF THE social evolution of individuals into Universal SUPER ORGANISMS.

So we write it often as 5D♥ (: or if we name them all together, just for the sake of ‘numerology’, they would be the 9th dimension – social evolution and the 10th dimension, the perception of the super organism as a whole or ‘mind-dimension’, which we shall see is made of a ‘singularity’ or linguistic point and a membrane that encircles the organism; closely related to the Tƒ element (perceived as such in a flat, shallow vision of the being as existing in a single scale of reality.

Yet when we understand the scalar Universe, it will turn out that the *singularity does connect the system across its scales of size, as it is an ∆• single ‘crystal’, ‘neuron’, ‘governor’, which controls ‘internally’, ‘chemically’ its ∆-1 parts, and it feels itself through its sensorial membranes ‘connected’ to a larger ∆+1 whole.*

The mind, the 10th dimension of a being, becomes then essential to grasp the workings and whys of reality even if ‘pedantic’ abstract physicists and its ‘philosophers’, logical positivists have completely ‘missed the point’ and deny the existence of such singularity minds. In the next graph we see this ‘completeness’ reached by the membrain singularity, in reference to the rest of the being, the open ball or vital body-energy=wave system:

+

=

In the graphs, the sum of the membrain+singularity, and the vital space of an open ball, gives us the whole being.

**The infinite dimensions and the ceteris paribus analysis of all the Universal information.**

We are being simple, given the fact that the present studies of physics are limited to 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension of time extracted from ∂t=∂s/∂v, as a series of still pictures in relativity theory).

THEY AD TO THE MIX, when philosophising about entropy arrows, some studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe.

The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time.

As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.

An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules.

A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.

The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies.

MOTION=YOUTH, WITH INCREASING ENERGY ORDER AND DECREASING ENTROPY TILL REACHING THE REPRODUCTIVE STATE OF BALANCE, AND THEN OF INFORMATION, DYING THEN INTO DISORDERED, SCATTERED MOTION, TO RESTART AGAIN:

*Γ@: Seed of information + energy<entropy = reproductive phetus<emergence<motion (entropy with a bit of form) > energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death **=zero sum*

So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:

*4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§*

**And many more (:**

So how many dimensions have reality? Actually as many as you wish, as each scale will have 3 dimensions of space-time in a single plane and 3 planes up and down the being, enclosed further in a larger world…

So if we are going to be exhaustive, with less than 56 dimensions/parameters we cannot make the whole sense of it (6 space-time topological dimensions for each of the 3 scales of the organism and the world above and below: 6 x 5 = 30 dimensions; four space and time dimensions of entropy and mind-evolution for each discontinuity between planes, which are two inner discontinuities between limbs/bodies/particle-heads, and two more with the outer world above and below, so 4 x 4 = 16 more dimensions, 30 + 16 = 46…

And then to fully describe the being we shall add for good measure the descriptions of even smaller and larger outer and lower worlds from where the being obtains its entropic motions and pixels of information, (5 dimensions for each of those interactions) for a minimal grand total of 56…

Now as current science works with only four dimensions, 3 of space and one of time you can assess how little information we extract in our description of most systems and why they look indeed abstract entities.

The situation though is much worsened by the ‘attitude’ of physicists with their infantile chit-chat on 4D models of reality, which they impose as dogma, so my experience in science congresses when I cared to assist was to be always surrounded by ‘savant idiots’ – masters of mathematical physics, which had zero idea about the meaning of the words they use in their mathematical equations, points, numbers, time, space, waves, particles, forces, masses, you name it… but wouldn’t care at all specially when the ‘speaker’ was not a certified specialist in mathematical physics (which obviously prevented him to break the straight-jacket of physical reductionism and 4D tensors), to hear anything about time, space and the meaning of reality. And this was specially truth when the speaker was a philosopher of science, the only discipline that ‘dares’ to challenge the reductionist, mechanist worldview of physicists.

So the reader will excuse me if I am specially sanguine among all the children of thought that play science in this planet with the false dogmas of physicists, which so much obscure the beauty of its equations, whose finding through the simple method of measuring and plugging information in mathematical structures seems indeed a marvel of Universal intelligence, given how little they understand of the concepts behind those equations, we clarify in earnest on our posts on astrophysics and its scales of time§paœrganism.

Don’t worry though, we are not making here 56-dimensional analysis (: at best we shall be happy with the reduced 5S+5T=10D³ analysis. We just wanted to show off a little bit of the ‘real complexity’ that all ‘the hidden information’ we do not study together for each space-time organism holds, so perhaps the reader become a bit humbler about the role and intelligence of us, the humind membrain… and finally learns to worship and respect the astounding beauty and symmetric harmonies of the infinite…

In that regard, if I ever achieve a converso that expands his mind from the 4D toddler world of physicists into 10D, I will be happy enough to fill some enlightenment of scholars is possible… So far we shall reduce us to that 5s≈5t analysis in broad strokes, of the main space-time super organisms of physical systems.

**How to see the 4th and ****5th dimensions.**

Spacetime ‘dimensions’ are thus dual, as space and time are equivalent – a dimension of time motion seen in space as a dimension of form.

3±i is the way to see reality – the 3 canonical dimensions of space, seen either in one-bit of data as length=motion, width=iteration and height=information or with 2 bidimensional ST elements as topological lineal=cylindrical, hyperbolic=cartesian and polar=spherical geometries.

A key theorem of all dimensional construct is that only beings with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So for time to transform into space it MUST have the same dimensions. And this can be analysed in terms of one, 2 or 3 dimensions of time-space.

Hence TRINITY, means we have 3 space topologies and 3 functions.

DUALITY means we have the previous fundamental varieties:

One-dimensionality MEANS the Galilean Paradox; we can see any dimension as motion or form, any two dimensions as a bidimensional plane or an accelerated motion.

And then we can play with all those (and we are only playing with a simple plane:) and variations will appear to make sense of all species of the Universe its forms and functions.

But an important rule TO ADAPT 4D formalisms (4-vectors, etc.) to 6D (in a single plane) physics for ‘future pros’ (:

*Time has the dimension of*

*Height*

*and the dimension of*

*motion*

*perceptive and the dimension of acceleration.*

*Space has the dimension of Length and the dimension of reproductive width and the dimension of deceleration.*

*a vector with motion.*

Now, for what we have seen, there ARE 2-4-6 DYNAMICAL bidimensional systems, as motion dimensions can become formal dimensions; which we can apply to many entities, meaning ‘even’ systems ARE more stable as they are balanced; while odd systems are not (or they are ternary systems in time): *so this odd-even duality that atomic systems always follow have its explanation.*

And in general we find that…

INFORMATION… is dominant in HEIGHT and internal, ‘accelerated’ motion as a vortex of time. So it appears still to an external observer, as the dimension of outer motion have become internal motion and as it shrinks its dimension of size, it accelerates its motion.

ENERGY in reproductive width and iterative beat.

ENTROPY IN LENGTH, and expansive SCATTERING motion that decelerates inversely as it increases its space.

WHILE TIME: Is dominant also in rhythm or beat in the closed clocks, and SO INTIMATELY related to ENERGY.

It is also important to realise humans have misused all those concepts for so long that ‘normal words’ can incur in errors.

**Reproduction of dimensions: vectorial product & present momentum**

*So we must understand a 5th dimensional being as one with the following natural dimensions:*

- The dimension of height or ‘informative dimension’
- The dimension of length or ‘speed dimension’
- The dimension of width or reproductive dimension
- The dimension of frequency or ‘time speed’ dimension
- The ∆+1 dimension of size or fifth scalar dimension.

Those suffice for almost all studies of physical systems, as most scalar analysis are ∆>∆+1 or ∆<∆-1, so we do not need more than 2 scales (as in thermodynamics between the ∆-1 and ∆-scale of heat). And then when we put them together in bidimensional systems, we obtain:

- The plane of pure space made of length and width, of motion and reproduction/storing of energy, which in motion tends to acquire an arrow or triangular, wave-like form.
- The plane of pure time, which tends to be the height and cyclical rhythm, or time speed; so time does NOT offer ‘many spatial elements’. In fact the dimensions of time are derivatives of space, ‘speed’ and ‘acceleration’.

On the other hand when we consider tridimensional systems, we obtain.

-Space-like 3 dimensional volumes, where a bidimensional layer has reproduced or stored more of its kind in superposition (concept that also applies to present spatial waves)

-Time-like 3 dimensional systems, which are accelerated vortices (2 differential dimensions) with a dimension of height (black holes, Maxwell’s screw driver, rule of the hand, product vector, etc.)

-And finally when we consider a 4 dimensional being, we obtain a holographic ‘perpendicular merging’ of a space-like and time-like bidimensional sheet, with a frequency of motion; as in a light-wave.

- Which will become a fifth dimensional being, when 2 scales become entangled and one feed on the other, or receives flows of information (as in the case of the Bohm’s model of a quantum wave, guiding a feeding upper particle).

So those are the vital whys of an enormous field, which allow us by form, function and dimensionality to interpret the structure of all kind of systems.

Topological physics deals with the ensembles of Spe<ST>Tiƒ structures, and has not been analysed in depth for very long. It is based in the holographic principle and its derivative laws, the most important of which is the ‘bidimensional nature of space and time, and its merging into 4 dimensional systems, which excludes a real 3-dimensional Universe (Fermat’s Grand theorem: x³+y³=z³.

This means the 3rd dimension does NOT really exist as an independent ‘parameter’ but IT IS THE DIRECTION OF reproduction of ‘identical beings’ which accumulate in layers

**Creation & Destruction of ****Masses as Vortices of Physical Information. How ****Dimensional Form Becomes Speed.**

*The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.*

*The equivalence principle establishes a Universe with two limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed of gravitational and electromagnetic forces and a cyclical speed of masses and charges, which are vortices of space-time. Energetic forces create space, and vortices are clocks of time that carry information, eternally transforming into each other in self-similar events:*

*Σ** spatial forces (lineal movements) ≤=≥Tƒ (cyclical clocks of information).*

*The sums of all those events maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.*

*Yet since lines have one dimension less than a clock cycle, the process can be also perceived as a game of creation and destruction of dimensions of form. In the graph, a three-dimensional slow nebulae accelerates its motion as it becomes a bidimensional vortex of faster, more attractive mass. Such transformation is common both in the cosmological world as stars become black holes and the quantum world in big crunches when electrons become quarks. r.*

The Galilean Paradox is essential to understand the Universe as fixed lines are also ‘—motions’ and bits of information are time clocks. And one can transform into the other: Se x =Tƒ. They do so through the 3 ages of life or energy’s standing points of a Hamiltonian:

Spe<ST<Tƒ= Youth: Max. Se/Tƒ > Maturity: Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ) >Old age: Tƒ/Se

But in physical systems they do so through external motions mostly by loosing or acquiring back and forth in space, dimensions of form or dimensions of speed.

There are two concepts that do not appear in classic physics but are essential in understanding how the universe converts energy into information (motion into form): the paradox of Galileo, which allow us to describe those processes as “frozen pictures,” which is the informative point of view, or as changes in the speed or motion of things.

The graph shows the two events combined: when a system acquires forms, it slows down. When a system loses dimensions, it speeds up. Yet to understand this essential process, we must first clarify an error made by physicists who do not use the concept of dimensional form to define “information” but the algebraic “data” concept of a “bit of information.”

Fractal information is related to dimensional form while algebraic information is the simplest dimensional form: bits of broken patterns emitted by waves, which encode those patterns in the distances between the crests or frequency of the wave. But those patterns are the “minimal” pattern of information of the Universe. In that regard, the capacity to store information *of any system follows a power law*:

*Information » X ^{ Fractal dimensions of the system}*

Yet in the same way, physicists have reduced all the arrows of time, previously defined to a single energetic arrow measured by a single “clock-time”; they have reduced all the forms of information to a single broken frequency pattern. Biology, a more sophisticated science of information, today is able to study how molecules and proteins store information in several dimensions; and that previous law can be deduced of biological studies. Yet *physicists have not gone beyond the simplest one-dimensional information of lineal waves. They have not even discovered that mass stores much more information than waves in physical bidimensional vortices.*

In duality, we study both sciences, physics and biology, and we can compare and use laws of both sciences to find self-similar laws in the other discipline. In that sense, Shannon’s standard definition of information is a computer-based definition, of technological science, useful to store information in numbers, with a limited application to the understanding of the universe, *which stores information in four dimensions in very complex patterns and enormous volumes.* Information is in that broader Universe form, in/form/ation. The simplest information is the one-dimensional broken bits of data that divide a line of energy into a pattern. This is what a computer does and what a physicist would understand as information. But in nature, a more precise concept is that of fractalization. Information increases when a continuous flow of energy breaks into patterns and acquires dimensions, bumps and points.

The arrow of information is a transformation of a surface of space, of energy into inner form: a change from lineal, chaotic movement into cyclical, repetitive one; from expansive waves into imploding particles; from disordered, equalized forces of indistinguishable forms extending in space into an ordered hierarchical system of non lineal mass vortices. Its inverse function is the explosion of energy, the dissolution of form, the arrow of *death*.

Though physics recognizes the inverse arrow of entropy as negantropy—that is, the negation of entropy—it is long overdue to name it properly as *form* that crystallizes and organizes chaotic lineal energy into cyclical, repetitive patterns of *in-form-ation*.

Indeed, Mehaute, a chemist studying fractal patterns and reversals of entropy into information, and other theorists in different disciplines have proved that when a system stops creating energy, entropy, it reverses its arrows of time creating instead information, fractal patterns of form*—the future never stops. This also applies to physics in the way form becomes motion and motion becomes form.*

The unification equation relates the different scales/membranes of space-time. Yet for each membrane and particle, we must clarify a final concept, the meaning of dimensions of information and how they disappear, converted into speed and energy or appear as motion and energy slows down, creating form. In the Universe, there are multiple physical species of different fractal non-Euclidean dimensions.

The new mathematics of complex physics means though that a flat plane of two dimensions has a minimal height, as each of its points of the flat network is in itself a world of a smaller scale. Thus, a flat vortex of mass, a bidimensional quark, has smaller gluons and strings, which have smaller dimensions. For that reason, there is equivalence between different mathematical descriptions in different dimensions. A fifth-dimensional description of strings is equivalent to a four-dimensional description of quarks, which is equivalent to a three-dimensional description of an electronic atom, and so on. It is a general law that all systems of physical mass pack energy in fractal dimensions of form:

Strings (one-dimensional dark entropy in a 5-D Universe) -> bidimensional quarks and gluons in a 4-D world -> three-dimensional electrons

This translates sometimes into different equations for a physical vortex and different power laws and relationships between masses (the static, formal, dimensional perception of a vortex) and speeds (its perception as pure motion). For example, Vo × Ro = K is a bidimensional vortex, which we used to explain in its simplest terms the equivalence principle.

However, the unification equation of charges and cosmological masses happens in a three-dimensional world. So we used a three-dimensional vortex equation, U.C. × M = w^{2 }× r^{3}, which is the vortex used to unify the three-dimensional worlds of cosmological bodies and electronic matter we perceive.

Finally, in the next chapter, when we compare the two families of quarks, top quark particles and strange quark particles, the relationship between their rotational speed and masses follows a three-dimensional power law (w^{3} = M). So the world of top quark particles turn at 10 c-speed but it has 1,000 times the mass of the world of strange quark particles that turn at a maximum of c-speed, which obviously means that the world of top quarks has one dimension more than the world of strange quarks. This is further proved by the famous Maldacena conjecture, which studies top quark black holes as five-dimensional string systems, self-similar to four-dimensional quark gluon soups.

We are more interested in explaining the concept illustrated in the graph: *how our slower three-dimensional electronic world will accelerate, acquiring energy/speed and losing a fractal dimension of form, when it becomes transformed into a strange quark condensate *since transformations of energy into information take place by warping and unwarping dimensions of form into speed.

A basic case observed in all scales is represented by the previous graph, taken from a *SciAm* article about the formation of galactic disks, which we used to illustrate the creation of a quark by the crunching of electronic nebulae of three dimensions. The slow rotation of the electron becomes a bidimensional faster quark system. The same process gives birth to a black hole in the cosmological realm, when the nebulae of a star or the gas of a galaxy collapses into a black hole.

All this means, of course, that dimensions are “fractal,” limited dimensions, which never extend to infinity but to the limits of a certain entity of the Universe. Thus, the creation of fractal dimensions of information or its transformation into speed is one of the commonest events of the Universe and at the same time one of the many details of the generator equation of space-time:

*Energy = speed **≤=≥**information = fractal dimension*

In the case we study in this post, we can consider a simple dimensional game by which slow three-dimensional electrons become faster bidimensional quark masses. There is a simple proof of the bidimensionality of our up and down quarks: quarks have one-third or two-thirds of the charge/dimensionality of electrons and so we need three quarks with perpendicular orientations called colors to form a three-dimensional quark structure able to interact with our three-dimensional electrons.

Further on, we must add the interaction of two different mediums and forces, the strong gravitational force of quarks and the electroweak force of electrons. This means that quarks “suck in” electrons, trying to absorb them, to feed on them, so they have implosive, strong gravitational forces, while electrons try to suck in quarks with its electromagnetic force, reason why we use a negative, implosive, absorbing direction for electronic charges.

In other words, quarks use its force to attract and steal momentum from electrons, and electrons use its electromagnetic force to attract and absorb momentum for quarks.

Those are the simplest visual concepts, to understand the interactions of those membranes. Obviously when we enter into topological details, the forms, dimensions, and charges of each of those elements become far more complex.

**The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.**

All this of course is not how we see dimensions and what we mean by the growth of dimensions in normal science – a far simpler proposition, which we shall address now. In the ‘simple 3D analysis +1 t dimension’, is all about ‘layers that accumulate making the 3rd dimension grow, and motions that create a time dimension to ad to it. This of course is a legitimate form of growing dimensions.

Only that after we have enough layers and motions, *there are no fancy spatial dimensions to add in a single scale. But a new point of an ∆+1 scale, as the graph shows: the left graph IS how the Universe grows a 5th dimension entering into a social upper scale (for a sphere that becomes a circle that rotates into a sphere; or for a dot that move sin to a line, which becomes laterally a reproductive plane that surge upwards to become a cube, unit of the new scaling. IT is the right graph trying to fit impossible 5 dimensions of space into a single continuum plane what is nuts. The penteract there is a 3-D projected into a 2-D, point.*

Thus, there is a lot of confusions on the meaning of the fourth and fifth dimensions of scalar space-time, as 4D is the naming given by physicists to ALL TIME CONCEPTS IN PHYSICS, as they do NOT differentiate between the 5 dimensions of time and the 5 of space, unaware of the philosophical deep meaning of the Galilean ‘relativity’ paradox, which clearly makes sense of the 3 dimensions of past, present and future (motion, energy and information), which are equivalent to lineal, hyperbolic and informative cyclical vortex in topology; and they do NOT differentiate between the ∆±2 scales of size and time speed, which are the origin of entropy=death arrows (fourth dimensions of space-time, jumping down, << i- two scales in the simplification of information, from wholes to infinitesimals) and social, mental arrows (fifth dimensions of space-time, jumping up i+2 dimensions).

So what the physicists mean when talking of time as the four dimension? Two things and since we are ‘nice’, we have called the fourth dimension, the arrow of entropy, which they use as the arrow of time, to match ‘magic!’, their reduced view of it:

They use the concept to signify a grand philosophy whereas the arrow of **entropy, the fourth dimension of timespace (Ti<<Si-2), **is considered the only arrow of future time, disregarding all other arrows, explicitly those who create information (fifth dimension of social organic evolution of wholes, 3rd dimension of accelerated time vortices).

This is one of the key concepts of the faulty philosophies of science.

Then there is the concept of Einstein, and the formalism of Minkowski, which corresponds to the ‘present 2nd dimensions of time-space’, which is used to study waves such as light is, and present ‘derivative’ minimal quantum changes, ∂t=∂s/∂v.

In that regard Minkowski grand conceptual thought, established a useful mathematical equation of 4-vectors, where the concept that time reduced to a present dimension of space, is useful *to study translations in space, with derivatives, which by definition do NOT change state with ‘peak standing points’, and changes of parameters that happen when we move from a motion-state of maximal Space-translation=lineal speed and minimal information-density to a vortex state of maximal information density and minimal translation in space=lineal speed*.

Once we understand such conceptual limits of time conception in physics we should 1)discharge as faulty, irrelevant and biased to 1/5th of time changes any entropic grand theory of the Universe, including the cosmic big bang, balanced by accelerated mass vortices (galaxies) that shrink entropy into matter, the evaporation of black holes as they do not travel lineally to the past, hence do not evaporate, and other grand bizarre scheme on reality.

While the fourth dimension of ‘space’ (time concept as a derivative that studies present slice of wave motions), must be understood as what it is a partial, wave-oriented analysis of spatial motions, which in special relativity makes more exact measures of those translations by reducing the total motion by a wave factor of warping, -c²t².

As physics has parameters which can be added as ‘curvatures’ and ‘scattering’ elements to define the ‘informative accelerated, and expansive decelerated’ *other two arrows of topological time, in a single plane, relativity as well as other equations of motion in physics do reflect perfectly (even if the concepts behind become blurred) those motions, its topological trajectories and so there is nothing to correct as usual in the processes of measuring of physics. The four vector formalism merely adds conceptual confusion but improves measure in ‘derivative details’. *

Two conceptual interpretations can be done in detail on those 4-vector equations (well beyond this introduction): if we *divide its four dimensions in two dimensions of space, Sx, Sz, and two of time, Sy -ct, then we can find many interesting symmetries between the space state (width-length: reproduction-motion) and the time state (height-information, **ct-curvature-motion). *It is only then when the proper understanding of the meaning of worldlines and light cones, becomes clearer.

Then properly interpreted, those 4-vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from space-time symmetries. That’s all.

The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.

Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.

All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wave-like motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given space-time symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.

Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.

This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.

4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of space-time bidimensional forms with motion.

We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.

Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on space-time can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D, Œ,Æ, non-Euclidean geometry, existential algebra and 5D metric.

In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2-manifold layers which create the ‘3^{rd} dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:

Now the growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:

it grows in pairs, often of space-time (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesian-hyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present space-time systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.

So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT TRIdimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVIN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is not-commutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.

So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an space-time plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.

In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3^{rd} dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œ-points’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.

*It must be notice though the essential duality of the 3rd postulate of Non-AE: perpendicular motions are darwinian, and parallel are social. So the vital energy herds are structured in parallel, but there should be between the singularity and the membrane, crossing perpendicular networks, invaginated, mostly made of the substance of the hard membrane (golgi channels in cells, electro-magnetic flows guiding matter on Earth, nervous systems on organisms, legal inforcers in nations, which will PREY and control the vital space for the @monad system).*

So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uranium-lead crystals.

The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atoms-particles-heads of the same layers.

And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.

Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3^{rd} dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5^{th} dimension.

Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing cheng-tzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of space-time, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.

**Einstein’s metric explain the contraction=warping of time-information by a slowing light ray.**

Let us now consider the geometry of Einstein, where time subtracts -c²t², considering time ‘i’, -c²x-¹ = +c².

Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², and that is ‘speed’ not ‘time’.

But for the non-mathemtical reader, a conceptual explanation makes more sense: *we subtract a dimension of information/height of the light wave to the flat line of its underlying neutrino≈graviton scale with less ‘height and more information’; so what the -ct term merely means is that ‘we loose neutrino speed’ and we gain height-wave information, we pass from a pure $-tate to an ST-wave state with curvature taken away from pure speed, as the neutrino≈graviton can ONLY give us information on the distance to the emitter but the wave height and frequency will give us a lot of information.*

And then doing the proper S=T equalisation of dimensions, we can use as physicists do all those space-like and time-like cones, knowing height *is also a dimension of time information, so (Sx, Sz) ≈ (Sy, Tƒ) IS the general rule for all systems that makes sense and gives the why to the ‘magic’ of maths.*

We though have many times mentioned that special relativity (not so general relativity concerned with gravitation, which is invisible and accelerated time clocks of mass) is a mind exercise of measure to adapt to our constant motion view, the ‘stop-emission of information’ go-wave motion duality particle-wave in which the speed of light is fixed as the emitter and receiver are entangled in the neutrino-graviton scale of ‘action at distance’ and simultaneity, stopped in relationship to each other.

So of course it is a cumbersome formalism with measure uses more than conceptual magic. And here is where the inflationary amount of multiple views to adapt measure exploded in XX c. with computer thought to make every physicist a high pope of relativity science, to the point that the great master, Einstein quipped ‘since mathematicians entered the field of relativity, I don’t understand it’ (:

For example, downwards we have the AMD, my preferred, formalism, where we use bidimensional sheets. But on the upper growth of complexity the description of this complex space-time 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block of timespace.

And so on… but all this is hardly needed fro a human pov of slow beings which do not curve space at c-speed in its translations.

*Only the military propaganda of the discoverer of the equation of the A-bomb made the system of our corrupted organism of history convert 4D physics in the ‘summit of all human forms of thought’ and fog in the process our concept of time. What we were actually told in the height of the cold war is: if this guy gave us the A-bomb to kill all humans it must be a genius because the military ARE the salt of the earth. Lol, the harder they fall.*

**Cross product, as reproduction of dimensions.**

It is then far more important given the blindness on meaning of mathematical physics to enlighten even the simplest concepts as ‘dimensions’ and ‘vectors: space-time bidimensional entities’, ‘numbers=social groups’ and ‘fractal points with growing breath’, etc.

Of course this is an INSULT for our geniuses which as Hilbert did with Einstein, despising first relativity for its simple maths – he was the God-talking man who ‘imagined points, lines and planes’ and set a ‘paradise’ for Cantor’s ‘building up’ of mathematics from the roof down, with its sets and axiomatic method, *which denied experimental mathematics and its real units, simultaneous fractal points of space (Leibniz’s monads: each point is a world in itself) and * sequential social numbers of the 4th and 5th real scalar dimensions. So He and Cantor imagined first the units of its axiomatic self-contained, ‘detached’ world of formal mathematics from the top down.

But the TOP of maths is NOT the set or category, constructions of the inflationary human mind, but the Universe itself WHICH IT MIRRORS, so the relationship IS from math’s units, fractal points and social numbers to Universe, the reality it mirrors, through the classic scales of topological networks of points and algebraic causal relationships between social numbers and its scales of ±, x ÷, x²,³…, ∫∂ (continuous operations in the 4th, 5th dimension) and log, ln (exponential death and decametric social growth), which are all the operandi we need to construct reality.

Needless to say Hilbert and Cantor were all about ego. They wanted to be God. So Cantor ended in a mad house literally, and Hilbert when he realized that ‘simple Einstein’ was the ‘thing of the future’ stole his theory which Humble Einstein had sent him to review, improve a bit the maths and *published it with his name! And yet today we still live in that ‘Dante’s inferno’ not paradise of those whose capital sin of arrogance fogs their reason, for wanting to be more than God.*

How can then go around studying the ‘hidden meanings’ in terms of its Time§paœrganisms of physics, and its ternary parts and symmetries an equation of physics?

It requires to know ‘mathematical meanings’ better than currently understood, besides the basics of the 10D³=(5+5)D.

5ST³ Dimensional realities observed by ‘4-dimensional’ self-centred @-minds is a fun game of confusions. As the mind is interpreting with its strictly reduced to see 3 dimensions of space and one of time… so there is always a lot of conceptual analysis behind.

A mathematical equation of physics, this said tends to be simple and mostly of the type:

E(st) = K (s) x ƒ (t)

That is the simplest ‘metric equations of the similar concepts: (5s•5t) D=5st D

Equations of physics in that sense are ALL as always in T.œs partial equations of the generator equation of 10D³ symmetries, whereas Γ@, the mind generator equation is an aristotelian, mathematical abstraction and syntax, in ternary symmetric dimensions:

**Γ@:*** ∆-1: $past potential limbs ≤≥ ∆ø: preSenT- body waves ≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒuture ahead-particles*

Whereas the Generator equation of physical systems, as expressed by the mathematical mind, will reduce the whole generator to a series of partial equations, which try to show part of it.

In the fantaphysical world of reductionism there is of course the search for a Unification Equation but expressing only in an equation the equivalence between the four forces of nature, which we have resolved as a trivial case of 5D metric.

What we mean here is a different thing: *All what happens as expressed in all languages are mirrors of sub-equations of the generator, and its 3 ‘parts in space-time’, its 3 flows of time arrows, <-entropy, >information, ≈ iteration, and its combined operandi, + -, x ÷, ±³, ∫∂.*

So for those who want to understand this section I refer them first to those on organic, vital mathematics.

Let us put a simple example: vectorial mathematics.

**Vectors as ST dimensional analysis.**

A vector is by definition a mind-mirror in two dimensions of a physical Time§paœrganism, where there is a simple dimension of motion, lineal time motion and of space, often an active magnitude, mass, charge or (light) colour.

So we can build mappings of multiple simple ST-physical forms with vectorial magnitudes, and generally speaking as *humans work often with bidimensional magnitudes, one of ‘volume’ of space (which they decompose often in 3 parameters) and one which aggregates all time arrows, there are a lot of meaningful vectorial analysis of the type: *

3 s = 3t

A basic symmetry of space-time dimensions with T.œ meaning for the timespace organism.

Whereas the space dimensions are analysed further in its simplest (not bidimensional topology), one-dimensional height-information arrow, length-motion arrow, width-reproduction arrow, void of all organic meaning, and time is analysed in the ‘future’ arrow mostly or present arrow (Einstein’s relativity) or past arrow (entropic processes), as if all where the same.

So the maths are good, the interpretations as usually poor.

It is then when the most useful ‘concept’ of physics, the concept of a present momentum, represeting such St COMBINATIONS appears, and its ‘conservation’ laws and ‘integral’s (energy worldcycles) allow an analysis of the event at ‘∆-1’ time-space quanta level (the momentum) or in its whole development as a world cycle (energy integral).

Such momentous momentums are then easily interpreted as expressions of ‘actions’ (the quanta of existence of any system), and worldcycles (the whole event when larger than a mere action integrated often as a conserved closed cycle).

The product of an s and t parameter though might be considered depending on the case, as a simple dot product, *if one of the two parameters is a mere quantiser of frequency in time population in space, and basically we are just ‘adding up’ social units of an ∆§caling perceived in space as populations that last, in time as sequential frequencies that have little memorial tail. *

Or as a true process of creation of a third dimension, which is the cross product, such as:

S x T = st-Perpendicular new dimension.

Thus the more interesting case is described by the cross product, *which to be real must have the two dimensions that originate them, so it must have motion, which becomes ‘reproduction’ *as it creates the 3rd space-time present, reproductive, ‘energy’ dimension of physical systems within the same plane, such as S x T = ST (reproduction dimension), which is the general translation of the cross product to GST.

A vector that reproduces the system, taking from it motion and form. This is the origin of the magnetic field and in general any *growth of a new membrane that encloses a previous scale absorbing its motion and form, ‘cooling’ the inner energy of the system, and as such is how the Universe creates new ‘layers of reality’ and we shall return to it.*

In that regard it must be understood as a general rule that:

*“sin functions are ðime functions of informative height or time§pace-like functions that reproduce a new combined ternary dimensions and cos functions are $pace-like functions that flatten and increase the single dimensionality of speed-distances-forces.”*

As we talk of the Y-coordinates as time-like coordinates (height-information dimension) and so a sin function = diagonal:st/y:t-coordinates, and a cos-function: diagonal:st/s-coordinates Sin = st/t cos=st/s ratios.

While the cross product combines two S, T factors, which form together an ST-plane *adding a new direction of reproduction (z-width plane):*

In vector algebra, the cross or vector product (is a binary operation on two vectors that creates a three-dimensional space (R3), denoted by the symbol ×.

Given two linearly independent vectors a and b, the cross product, a × b, is a vector that is perpendicular to both a and b and therefore normal to the plane containing them. It has many applications in mathematics, physics and engineering. More generally, the magnitude of the product equals the area of a parallelogram with the vectors for sides; in particular, the magnitude of the product of two perpendicular vectors is the product of their lengths.

The cross product is anticommutative (i.e., a × b = −(b × a)) and is distributive over addition (i.e., a × (b + c) = a × b + a × c).

It also depends on a choice of orientation or “handedness”.

**Wave motion.**

It is then easy to introduce two simple examples of vectorial physics, one to express the complex dimension of Sxt REPRODUCTION or wave state, and other to consider the particle-field cyclical vortex state.

The first equation is obviously c² ≈ K-urvature=acceleration/µagnetic ‘density’=inertial resistance,

where the field of light reproduction of information is the ratio between the spe accelerated speed and magnetic density of information of the system.

What all this means generally is that a and b are $pe and tïƒ functions and a x b is therefore an ST ‘new dimensional form’.

This in abstract might sound very general but when we study mathematical physics, we shall see what it means. Consider for example, the field of light space-time:

In the graph, the cross product of the ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC, Tïƒ and $pe elements creates the 3rd dimension of reproductive speed in a light ray, and both are perpendicular to maximise the ‘inner product space’ they ‘absorb’ to reproduce its form in the speed of the wave (disregard the wrong wording, where it says energy should say entropy). Consider the magnetic force F on a charge q travelling at speed v in magnetic field B. (See electric motors for examples of magnetic forces.)

The magnitude of that force is proportional to v and proportional to B, so we need a product of the two vectors. The magnitude F of the force is also proportional to sin θ, where θ is the angle between v and B. Now this magnetic force F is a vector, so we need not just its magnitude, but its direction. That direction is at right angles to both v and B.In this case from the human pov, a being, which uses electronics as information and the gravito-magnetic field as entropy of motion, the magnetic flat field (Spe) x the informative high electric field, equals the ST-energy speed of the system (energy ≈ v²). So the cross product DOES generate a 3rd element, normally st.

**Angular momentum**

We have considered that certain ratios are of enormous importance as they become constants of the Universe, one of them is the ratio known as angular momentum. As it is the best description of a particle state, with 3 bits of information, the ‘density of information of the membrane’, its ‘speed of rotation’ and the radius to the ‘mass-mind singularity’, thus bringing together the ‘whole’ @ system with 3 simple parameters.

As such IT MUST BE CONSIDERED THE KEY parameter of the membrain-singularity physical system, and as such the unit of the quantum world, h, is measured in such terms, and ultimately mass can also be seen as a measure of an angular momentum, giving us the information about the whole system.

* The angular momentum L (Ts)* of a particle about a given origin is defined as: L = r x P

where r (t) is the position vector of the particle relative to the ‘singularity’ tiƒ origin, and P (spe) is the linear momentum of the particle.

Now consider the torque τ produced by a force F about an axis from which it is displaced by r. The magnitude of that torque is proportional to r and proportional to F, so again we need a product of two vectors; since R is obviously the radius of the Œ-system, related to its singularity, Tiƒ, and F, the membrane in motion that limits the system (its maximal Spe-element)

The magnitude τ of the torque is also proportional to sin θ, where θ in this case is between r and F. (Notice that it, in both these cases, we need sin θ, whereas the scalar product had cos θ). The torque τ is a vector: torques in different directions in general cause rotations about different axes. That direction of the torque (which is often but not always parallel to the axis about which it causes rotation) is at right angles to both r and F.

So we define the vector product thus:

|a X b| = ab sin θ, and

a X b is at right angles to a and b in a right handed sense.

And the beauty of it is that it also has an ∆-interpretation depending on which is the DOMINANT arrow $pe or tïƒ, upwards (so it becomes an informative growing ∆-dimension) or downwards (so it becomes an entropic diminishing ∆-direction).

And so we talk of a simple ternary system, generated by a cross product, which in modern maths is better described as the ‘surface’ parallelogram between both:

So the creation of *dimensions or its transformation into each other fully defines the construction of full Spe<St>Tiƒ physical systems.*

Finally we shall deal with the fifth dimension in physics, when we introduce the birth of ∆nalysis, its formalism, found in mathematical physics, which definitely married both disciplines. And will be our last part of introduction to mathematical physics, as an introduction to the third part of this blog, a review of all physical ∆-planes…

We can in the graph observe how the ‘Rashomon effect’ (different povs and different equations to portrait the same phenomena) and the usefulness of relativity and 4D models, to illustrate different perspectives and dimensions.

In this case a key concept of both classic and new stience is the angular momentum, which *can be seen as the membrane vortex in motion of physical systems, which will be ultimately the membrane of a mass singularity/enclosure.*

In the four vector vision, angular momentum IS *HOWEVER seen as a ‘quantised’ informative angular surface which shows the perspective of the centre of mass, which ‘absorbs’ a ‘radian’ quanta, h/2 of the force field ‘each slice of time.*

So we can see in the relativity=max. mental stilness=max. present view of angular momentum, as a bidimensional triangular, radian plane.

It is then important to consider in much more depth the meaning of the ‘constants’ of action and 5D planes in physical systems, h, k, and.. c…*as they will also have different states, as circular motions, (c-speed around black holes, h as spin), as lineal motions and energy parameters (h in e=hƒ, c in e=mc², etc.)*

Ultimately our thermodynamic/magnetic world is a ‘vibration’ between the limits of those 2 ‘constants’ of our minimal informative particle/quantum scale, and our maximal speed of motion=reproduction of form, the constant c, which *becomes **the constant of scale of the next dark world beyond our Universe… *

As the maximal value of reproduction of information of an ∆-1 scale becomes a mere minimal quanta of space in the larger ∆+1 scale where the game starts afresh. So a cell might be a full being in ∆-1 but becomes the minimal quanta of entropy to feed and ∆+1 super organism, and so on.

Let us then go deeper in the meaning of Universal constants, and its multiple roles on mathematical physics.

**∆•ST****: MAGNITUDES**

** RATIOS, ****LIMITS & UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS**

**The question of measure – what a mind perceives and how it perceives other beings and its time-space cycles.**

We can now consider what will be more important to physicsts – the questions of mesure of those ternary systems.

To start with, the singularity, the most important part is almost invisible to us, as it is the infinitesimal part (see central post on mind-moands). So physicists observe them as particle-points. How then we measure them? As we explain in the general model, through its ‘actions’ of existence.

And this will also be the case of physics. Systems as ‘open balls’ are only perceived in its body-wave mostly, either as it moves in body-wave configuration or as it stops to perceive as particle systems. And in both cases the most observable form will be the external membrane, and its actions that carry the will of existence of the central singularity that perceives.

**TOPOLOGICAL INSIGHTS ON THE TERNARY SUPŒRGANISMS OF ∆±i SCALES.**

The method of relational space-time is clear: we depart from the conviction that in all the scales of reality there is a fundamental particle, the supœrganism of space-time which the fractal generator defines in its 10 dimensional structure. And when we observe the scales of reality that are closer to us, we find them ‘having’ those supœrganisms in infinite varieties, albeit recognisable in all of them, either physical, biological or social ones.

It is then obvious that in the scales we do NOT see, those supœrganisms must exist and we just have to interpret the scanty evidence we have of those worlds, to realise they ‘are there’. This is relatively easy to do when we enlarge our view to the Galaxy, and even beyond, though we can’t truly assess if the ∆+4 scale is an infinite tapestry of atomic galaxies as described by Einstein-Walker metric (a steady state modelled with galaxies AS hydrogen atoms), or it might have a limiting size… So we cannot and certainly will not make ‘bad’ science and accept the ‘mathematical religion’ that because an equation, v=Hod MIGHT in the simplest terms define a a finite mortal Universe, it IS there, with no evidence.* *

In the other limit things get also difficult to assess, because the clocks of time of smallish systems are very fast and make us confuse time and space parameters, as in quarks and weak forces. The problem here is the fact we cannot assess below the atomic scale, the self-similar scale to that of the galaxy, much of what we see. We are then in the realm *of pure interpretation, of mathematical equations; which by force can only extract a minimal quantity of properties of the systems described. And the distortions of the human mind become then more evident.*

The error of the ‘religion of mathematical creationism’ comes then in full force as *mathematics becomes overwhelmingly a synoptic ‘herding’ language of numbers, in which a ‘number’ reduces the whole properties of a herd of individual supœrganisms to a mere ‘indistinguishable quality’. *

This does not matter to creationist physicists, who believe the language creates reality and abandon any attempt to fully advance the comprehension of the physical world at the two levels we ‘ignore’ but can in principle *with a huge amount of thought experiments being resolved (and would have been resolved in this author had obtained help from ‘pros’ on the discipline, but for personal causes of activism against the nuclear industry it did not, abandoning himself the task):*

- THE PROPER INTERPRETATION in vital organic terms, of the meaning of mathematical abstract equations, as we have done with the evolution of Non-Euclidean mathematics, redefining the fractal point, the wave-line, the laws of congruence according to the self-similarity of form and energy and so on.
- The add-on to the ‘scanty’ properties we can measure of those minimal parts (herded into numbers, herded into functions, herded into functionals and displayed into all its ‘potential variations’ of events in times and forms in space).

As we said the task is difficult, it won’t have much of an audience, as religious people do not like to reason and yet from time to time among many other sciences we must evolve into the 10D paradigm, we shall attempt to cast further light on those subjects.

The purpose of humind physics though seems to be enough for its praxis, which is to herd, ab=use and extract from those lower quantum scales, in a more professional, industrial way, in order to create a parallel electronic mind to that of man, the m(ach)ind, or digital thought, the essential elements physicsts require to that task: bits of information that can be manipulated to calculate those digital thoughts (computers, quantum devices, based mostly on the informative properties of spins and electrons) and extract energy of motion (obtained mostly from electromagnetic forces).

It might then seem absurd the purpose of our inquire: to understand and ‘feel’ the life and thoughts of those supœrganisms, to define them not as abstract entelechies herded and resumed in all its time events, space forms and ∆-scales as mere ‘numbers’ and its synoptic functions, functionals as we do in farms with masses of pigs and chickens, of which we only want to see the final product – the meat extracted and put onto our hamburguer. Who cares about what ‘was a hamburger’? About the life of the pig? Who cares about what is truly an electron or a photon as a supœrganism? W just want them to feed our machines and become the liquid fluid of its calculations. And for that its presentation in indistinguishable ‘hamburgers’ is more than enough. Fine.

Yet what is not proper is to deduce as philosophers of physics do that the scale of ‘pigs’ is not a living scale but a sea of ‘hamburgers’ different from all other scales of mammal life. And since ultimately the purpose of these posts is to show the unity and self-similarity of all beings of all scales we need to go beyond those limited assessments of the quantum ‘hamburger’ scale, and retrace the ‘final product’, the mathematical synoptic equation, to its initial origins, even before we measure them, the PlanCktons, or supœrganisms of light, which we transformed finally into the hamburger. What is than a plankton, the first ‘supœrganism we fully see? The minimal ‘cellular’ element of our electronic minds?

Let us search then for an answer.

**Limits: mind singularities and membrains**

Physics is a science of limits between ∆-scales and ratios, within them. In the graph the limits of our human ∆±1 scales found on the atom-galaxy, c-speed (limit of S: entropic speed and ST: wave-transmission of information) and 0 K (limit of Tiƒ-order). Beyond those limits though, with scanty perception of the human observer we can hint at a larger scale outside galaxies, which faster than light speeds and lower than 0k order. To understand though those outer parameters, it is needed to fully grasp some mathematical ill-understood concepts such as negative numbers and imaginary numbers, treated in the section of mathematics and applied to physics on the fourth line.

In the graph the ternary structure of the Universe seen in topological terms as an open ball. It gives us once we know that minds are still mappings of reality in a point, a hint to what we measure when we give a constant value to a point-particle in a Universe in perpetual motion, *its still mind volume of information, which is the only ‘still fixed’ absolute parameter of a system, which we can measure with a scalar, and so we shall in general associate energy to a measure of the vital space, frequency to a measure of the cyclical motion of its membrane or the scalar value of its singularity, and speed to an entropic measure of the external world. *

In that sense in the same manner that a charge is minimal even zero in the internal region of a charged spherical form (Gauss) the central point of the absolute mass, the black hole axis in fact has no mass, it is the inverse entropic point from where it will jet its ‘dark entropy v>c’ tachyon (Kerr black hole) entropy after ‘stopping in the mind point’. So we can talk of a toroid structure in dynamic terms for all the singularities of temporal clocks of future in physical systems.

In the graph, topological motions are the ultimate basic elements to define most elements of physics in generic, isomorphic terms. The singularity or charge/gravity centre represents the point of still transition between the inward, cyclical motion of the membrane, and the lineal, perpendicular, entropic axis flow, which in each sub scale of ∆§ will be measure by humans with different parameters.

Those parts of any physical system, studied from the perspective of its mind-singularity or frame of reference in physics, will then become the objects of inquire of physical super organisms, with clear different functions, which correspond to the general laws or ‘isomorphisms’ of any 5D³ system of 10 dimensions (5 of time and 5 of space, or 3 of time 3 of space 3 scalar dimensions and 1+1 of the mind, and so on, depending on which ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of its total properties we make).

The TERNARY symmetries between still ‘S’ informative singularity T-cyclical membrane, and ST vital energy they enclose DEINES topologically the ‘singularity and membrane’ of an ST-open ball.

The singularity IS A CENTER OF COORDINATES IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, AND ALSO A zero point where motion stops’. As such it will be the simultaneous function of space-IN-form-ATION of the being.

In the outer limit of that being, the angular momentum of maximal cyclical motion defines he T-membrain or enclosure, which breaks the being into an inner vital space, the open ball proper, whose energy and combination of motion and form, will be synchronised and complete the whole.

IT IS THE INTERACTION of those 3 elements within themselves and with the external world through actions of space-time, motions in space and informative trans-formations in time, what will define the different scalar super organisms of physics, the photon, the electron, the quark, the atom, the molecule, the matter state, the gravitational body and the galactic super organism.

So we can describe them all departing from a 10D generator equation: Γ@= ∆-1 $pe<∆-St>Tƒ∆+1.

Analytically though most singularities are measured not as whole ternary systems but by its ‘actions’, of exchange of entropy, energy and information through its ‘angular momentum’ membrain, or halo, electron, magnetic field, surface of exchange of heat, etc. of which the more thoroughly investigated in physics are pure translations in space; and lacking a philosophy of s=t dimensions and st œrganisms, used to model all other phenomena in terms of space-motion (including the other arrows of time, all forces including the time-transformative weak ‘force’, and so on.)

So while all the equations of physics are meaningful tools of praxis, measure, they must be reorganised and enclosed within the ‘real super organisms of time-space’ as partial equations that describe its actions and motions, making sense of them all.

As in biological beings, where evolution starts either by the creation of a membrane, which encloses a vital water, which will evolve in time to create a cellular organism, or by the replication of a singularity seed of memorial information that reproduces faster the whole being, physical systems appear with the interaction and/or evolution of a singularity and a membrane. ONLY THAT in physical systems the ‘networks’ of proteins that connect both part are more ‘fluid’ and ‘geometrical’, becoming the dual fields of in-form-ation and expansive motion, that coordinate the dual ST motion-form tendencies of the energetic vital space-time between them (magnetic+ electric fields, gravitational + electromagnetic forces, and so on).

It must be also understood the duality of motion (lineal state) and form (cyclical state), even if form often offers an accelerated inward motions (T-future state), to fully grasp the duality of all physical beings and its membranes, expressed in the duality of particle-wave states, angular frequency and lineal inertia. So we can define the membrane either in 2 or 3 dimensions as a function of angular momentum, and/or sinusoidal waves, where the envelop is the ‘wave train’, which is the T-membrane state in lineal motion. So goes for 3 Dimensional systems, where the Harmonics of the membrane will describe all its modes of vibration, which in turn will define in its solutions, the proper way in which the membrane acts *to absorb entropic motion from the external world, acting as a potential field of ‘entropy’, which the membrane will vibrate in order to absorb that entropic motion.*

The membrane thus will be described by a series of fourier harmonic functions, which in most cases will bring an inward potential arrow towards the singularity, ‘informing’ the system’s central still mapping. And only in the inverse arrow of entropy and death, the 4th dimensions of scalar-space time, when the whole (membrane and singularity) dissolve and no longer can retain with its ‘pressure’ balance the inner vital energy of the open ball the system will explode and entropy-motion will come from the space-time organism, dying: Γ@<<∆-1,2.

On the other hand the singularity will be perceived as a static point and as such can be described by an informative scalar parameter, mass or charge, according to its curvature (G or K); and so we have the parameters of ‘angular momentum or lineal inertia’ for the membrane and curvature and active magnitude mass or charge for the singularity, leaving the parameters of momenta for the individual ‘cell’ or energy for the whole vital space-time enclosed between both.

As the symmetries between ternary topologies of space, time ages and ∆±i scales constantly transform and exchange entropy, energy and information between them, the dynamic analysis of those elements create the complexity of physics, to which we must add specially in ∆-i planes, the social evolution of millions of quasi-identical ‘fractal points’ of physical systems, which make the social laws expressed in logarithmic scales, and its decametric and ternary , e, π mathematical operations, integrals and analysis, along group theory, which expresses in abstract, those symmetric changes and transformations of the 3×3±i dimensions of the entity the all pervading elements of mathematical physics.

Yet its abstraction in the present formulation of those elements, symmetries, planes and scales should not ‘fog’ us from referring them all to the ultimate particle-structure of reality, the Time§paœrganism (ab.T.œ), the fundamental entity of Nature.

What are then the constants physicists use mostly to define those elements?

In each scale they are different, but it is fairly straight to conclude that the limits of human perception, in both limiting scales are the scalar values of charge and mass for the singularities, and the lineal and angular states of h, ~~h~~ and c as lineal speed in the gravitational scale of the galaxy *and rotary c-speed in the membrane of black holes and in the lower scale heavy quarks.*

So both constants of the membrane of quantum and gravitational systems, h and c can be seen in lineal terms or as cyclical membranes that enclose the particle states (charges and black hole masses). Whereas, we, thermodynamic beings sandwiched between scales will tend to see the lower more informative constant of action of the quantum scale as a spin/angular momentum membrane of the particle/wave states of the electron that ‘covers’ the atom, and see the c-instant of the galactic membrane, more as a limit of speed of reproduction in the larger scale, since we see larger systems from our more curved perspective as flat, as opposed to smaller systems that have more curvature (h-constant).

Yet in ‘scalar physics’, we shall be able to unify both mass and charge as two curvatures of different speeds and h and c, which in praxis indeed are unified as they are consider 1 in natural units, and can be considered the ‘1 quanta’ of the two limiting scales. While in the middle, where information is maximal the thermodynamic scale has a much more complex, dynamic variety of constants, but we can safely state that temperature would be the scalar valuation of the singularity density and K the constant of action, from where we ‘predate’ as gravitogmagnetic entities our entropy of motion (reason why unlike h measured as angular curvature, and c measure as lineal speed, k is measured as entropy hits, from the human perspective – use of it).

**THE TRANSITIONS: RATIOS AND UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS EXPRESSED BY MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.**

**∆ST LAWS BETWEEN PLANES. MAGNITUDES AS RATIOS; INVERSIONS AND SYMMETRIES.**

We are going now to introduce the basic mathematical equations and parameters of those scales, in a first sight of mathematical physics.

In that sense, Physical systems respond to all the properties of GST systems, but humans ∆º minds, mostly mathematical in its scientific pov, apply to them and investigate only in terms of ∆º=st, that is a single space-time plane and its mathematical equations of dynamical changes in a single continuous time-space and this is both only a part of its scales, which makes impossible to understand its co-existing organic properties and one ‘single, lineal, entropic time arrow’.

It is then a wonder that with so ill-concepts its equations work – why is that?

The answer of course is that you *don’t need to comprehend what you manipulate, but by the mere method of gathering experimental **evidence, and ensemble equations the magic of the mirror of the mathematical language, works, as you don’t need to know thermodynamics to invent a vapour machine and how light organises its transmission of information to invent a radio – the Universal intelligence embedded in all ∆ºst systems and mirror languages provide for it; but obviously the humind egotist membrain things it is all done by ‘it’.*

Further on two features of ∆st maths help this streamlining as the equations are similar.

So to correct in mathematical parameters lineal time; as frequency, the parameter of informative, cyclical time is merely the inverse of lineal duration, ƒ=1/t, or rather a ‘quanta’ or ‘step’, a detail of a longer duration, whose finite sum of frequencies and form of steps are eliminated in lineal time, it is easy to ‘translate’ into cyclical time-equations ALL the equations of physics (even though sometimes we cannot recuperate the detailed lost information of each step and form of the cycles).

This was in fact the first *steps i did into 5D³ 30 years ago and it worked giving me huge number of solutions to obscure problems in all the fields of physics and a sound interpretation of them.*

What about ∆§cales? Here again, as we can do ceteris paribus analysis of each scale as if it were a ‘closed’ Universe in itself, which is what physicists do albeit with different conceptual jargons and slightly different physics (reason why they think quantum physics is different) which are distorted by the human view of it that has to ‘break through’ the discontiuities of ∆-scales and recuperate with its mathematical ‘imagination’ the lost information, the main work to do is the interpretation and explanation of why the distortion of the humind perception of far away scales with uncertainty and dark region does NOT imply reality is different but merely a different human view, which can be fully understood when we know the main new field in ∆§pace physics. And we shall return to that, when studying the different parameters/perceptions humans have of each scale making them seem different to us, when they are self-similar (quantum uncertainty, dark entropy, etc.)

**Duality of right mathematical vs. wrong conceptual**

**physics**

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time). And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, *given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly. *

**3 examples taken here will suffice: **

Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions o**f ****time to mere **entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

**The key errors: ∆•$ð, ratios cycles, ternary systems.**

Observers inhabiting a Bohmian universe (made out of Bohmian particles) observe random-looking outcomes of their experiments whose statistics agree with the rules of quantum mechanics for making predictions. This merely the degree of freedom of ∆-1 parts in the o-1 unit time sphere equals the ∆º:1-∞ plane

Classic Physics doesn’t work in his explanation of the fundamental principles of reality because its fundamental principles, *which are the same of any entity of any ‘stience’, the three arrows of timespace, spatial entropy, temporal form and energetic combinations of both, extending across ‘scales of the fractal fifth dimension’*, DO NOT EXIST in the simplified 4D continuous models of this stience.

So while the ‘distorted’ mental p.o.v. traced by classic physics does work, on praxis (as it caters to the distorted human mind, which sees itself not as a language but as reality itself->naive realism), on theory it does not have a ‘clean sheet’ view of reality, which is what we shall add here to the mathematical precision of measure and its manipulation, encased in mathematical equations, based on that distorted view of a single space-time continuum and a single time-clock/arrow.

SO 5D physics adds the 3 elements discovered by the fractal paradigm:

**The rediscovery of c**a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time. The cyclical nature of time establishes the reason why space-time events and forms repeat in the universe, justifying epistemologically in sounder grounds the fundamental two elements of science – predictability of future events, based in its occurrence in past times, and logic coherence, or causality beween past and future events.*yclical time clock*s,- Yet
**causality in a 5Dimensional scalar Universe**is more complex than in classic science, as time is cyclical, meaning that from past to future, we observe an arrow of information, which then returns from future to past, as an arrow of entropy completing a causal worldcycle. **Time cycles break space into an inner and outer reality. So the Universe is also made o**(the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).**f ‘fractal, vital spaces’**- Finally, those cycles are ordered by size in space and its opposite speed or frequency of its closed cycles, into a new 5th dimension with a generic metric:

* Spe(spatial size) x Tiƒ (time frequency) = ∆ (Constant ratio).*

That is smaller systems run faster informative cycles, and larger systems are slower. Yet the product of both parameters remains invariant, allowing travels through the 5th dimension, of organic nature. Now, we have added a key word to constant, ‘**ratio**‘.

Because an essential fact derived of the scalar nature of the 5th dimension and the limits of the ∆• mind that observes any reality is that all systems are relative also in scale, so the parameters we use are mostly ‘ratios’ between t-densities, s-peeds and ts-momentums… all must be compared to make sense.

*This means the three parameters that will matter to physics will be ratios: *

**$:** speed, v=f(s)/f(t), the entropic ratio of motion.

** ρ:** density, the main ratio of information: f(t)/F(s), mostly an active magnitude of each physical scale/volume.

**p:** momentum≈ f(s) x f(t): existential force,

This fact is denied by physicists, who still think in absolute ratios, hence their obsession to measure exactly the mass of the fundamental particles of reality, without much interest in understanding the ultimate meaning of mass (no, we shall not take seriously the Higgs hoax).

More of this latter. So ratios matter more than matter, and indeed in mathematical physics we shall observe this truism when we realise that serious physical equations, key to translate the ‘partial equations of the generator’ (continuity, diffusion, etc.) are expressed in ratios.

It is a key advance to grasp physics and something obvious in physiology:

We are NOT killed by huge electric fields because they are beyond our perception; don’t hear ultrasounds and don’t see ultraviolet light even if it has more energy. Yet if there was only a plane continuum, those values would be absolute and we would be truly affected by higher energies, according to its absolute value.

Nothing of this is understood in classic physics. As the similar case, which only Russell the philosopher, truly grasped – that relativity meant time events, not spatial forms, are real (simultaneity in 4D defines spatial measures from a mind perspective – as such space does not really exist but minds create it to ‘fix motion’ into perception.)

Now of course they DO have mathematical equations to explain them. But the meaning, the organic whys – the larger view of a philosophy of science that explains properly what is time and space, matter, mass, dimensions, waves, spins, etc. is missed.

To upgrade astrophysics is a daunting task not because of the difficulty of its statements but of the sheer size of the discipline and the encroached error of lineal time and continuous space, to which we might ad two handicaps for reform – the enormous development of praxis in physics (industrial machines), which obliges to maintain old theoretical errors, as long as its methods of measure and construction of machines do work to avoid cumbersome reprintings of billions of books (we still hang on errors acknowledge by all physicists about magnetism as a different force from electricity and electrons as negative, when they are the ‘positive’ attractive poles of electricity, dating to the XVII and XVIII c.) and parallel to that mechanical power, the enormous arrogance of physicists as scientists who believe to be the ‘Popes’ of the ‘religion of the number’… that suffices in itself.

In that regard a single example will suffice: today most professional physicists are aware that the Broglie->Bell->Bohm, ‘B3’ pilot-wave realist interpretation of quantum mechanics is the ‘true one’ and the Copenhagen idealist version an anthropomorphic ego-trip, for a simple reason: facts are increasingly favouring the realist vision, which among other things is the only rational explanation for the EM engine, which will likely become the interstellar choice for travel.

Only the realist interpretation (which happens to be the only adequate for 5D) accounts for it. But this alternative truth languishes because the equations are essentially the same. So who ‘cares about interpretation’, if the why is not what we ask?

**Scalar transitions. How membranes function and emerge.**

An important part of the why of physics is therefore to study how *new scales emerge, how super organisms build its ternary forms, departing either from the emergence of a singularity point or from the external membrane.*

This again is easier to understand departing of our scale, observing how this intermediate ‘magnetic world’ between the atom-galaxy and the galaxy-atom emerges and transcends, giving up energy and mass to the gravitational world.

AS ITS parallel thermodynamic world the maximal detail is observed in this scale to understand better the extreme planes we don’t see. The workings of the magnetic field then become evident, and by self-similarity can be applied to the understanding on how other planes emerge. It is only needed that the charge moves *for an external observer (it always moves from a certain pov) to see how a magnetic field appears NOT to extract directly entropy=motion from the particle but to ‘curve its trajectory’ and hence confine it within a larger world.*

However a vital view of the function of a magnetic field in organic terms is far more interesting. Indeed, a brief resume of its actions:

According to the 3rd postulate of non-E congruence, which all systems follow:

Magnetic attraction occurs between charges which are moving in same direction (parallel evolving phenomena).

Magnetic repulsion occurs between charges which are moving in opposite directions (antiparallel=perpendicular in one dimension – darwinian phenomena).

Thus magnetism becomes the social force that harmonises groups of charges.

This function though is possible due to the ghost-like lightness of the ‘envelope-bubble’ of magnetism.

And so the magnetic field *has always to be considered in terms of membranes only.*

Incidentally to mention that the greatest underrated physicist of modern times, Mr. Heaviside, which simplified the 20 equations of Maxwell into the 4, also defined the equation of gravito-magnetism, which *connects the ∆ø scale of magnetism and the ∆+1 scale of gravitation, a decade before than relativity did, with the same phenomena, and the same equations that magnetism has for ‘flat space-time gravitation’ – basically all gravitation that affects us, except in the close vicinity of black holes, where gravitation itself, as understood within the galaxy becomes deformed by the ‘open door’ to the dark world outside the galaxies that black holes signify.*

It is then an essential part of 5D physics to fully comprehend *how new membrains and singularities, focus of those forces ‘enclose’, predate and absorb the energy of the lower scales; which is what ultimately express the simplest, most important equations of physics in which terms of different scales are equated.*

Consider the simplest equation, which nicely relate all the 4 fundamental scales of physical nature (quantum, light and electronic, magnetic and gravitational scales – since our thermodynamic ‘vibrations’ are just a secondary parasitic scale that takes energy from all of them in the form of electromagnetism and temperature – molecular momenta):

PARTICLE’S MAGNETON: 2 M µB= ~~h~~e

The beauty of this equation BOTH for a proton, of mass Mp and an electron of mass Me is obvious. Here we have the 4* fundamental active magnitudes in its minimal quanta for magnetic forces, mass, light energy and electronic charge, completely equated with just a 2.0′ ‘dual’ factor. *

And so it has to tell us something very important on the relationship between those parameters of the 4 sub-scales of physical nature: h>e>µB>M

Now the first hypothesis we can forge is one obvious process of E*mergence of the two upper membrains of Nature, the magnetic and gravitational membrain, as ‘resonances’≈ emergent new planes of the fifth dimension, which extract its ‘energy of existence’ for the lower, ‘denser informative, faster, clocks’ of the ‘inner Russian dolls of nature, the electron and its ‘dense’ photonic quanta. *

And as mass and magnetism are in one side and planckton and electric charge on the other; it all suggests that we can ‘split’ our reality if we were to consider two ‘regions’ only with our thermodynamic ∆o reality in the middle, in the smaller world of light and electrons vs. the larger world of magnetism and gravitation.

This hypothesis latter analysed in far greater detail on the fourth line of mathematical physics and scales, would also imply that *depending on particle and substance, the emergence of magnetism and gravitation differs. For the electron, most of the emergent scale will be magnetic, as its mass is minimal, for the nucleon most will be gravitational, as its mass is maximal.*

So the emergence keeps a certain duality which we shall see carried through all scales of the H-planck>e-charge>electric current>magnetic force; meaning the ‘jump into the mass’ membrane and the interaction with our light-electronic world is minimal.

While quarks will become the real candidates, specially in its heavier families to transcend and emerge the small quantum world and jump into the awesome 10ˆ40 hierarchy of the galaxy-atom. And we shall return to all that.

Now, THE sub-theme on how *new planes emerge by predating, enclosing and forming a singularity that traps as ‘vital energy/space’ the previous microforms is also very externes. It deals basically with the ’emergence’ by resonance in time, of new 5D singularity-membrains, from atomic spins to magnetic membranes to angular momentum, in ‘gravitational systems’ of mass.*

And it does have to do with the ‘reversal’ between scales in dimensional directions and inversions in the ‘motion vs. form, entropy vs. social evolution, t and ∆±1 inversions, between the 1st and 3rd, the 4th and 5th dimensions of space-time. WE shall treat them in the second part of this post, dedicated to each scale and the 3rd line of the blog in physical scale.

Let us make some consideration in a most obvious form in which this ‘energy-cyclical motion’ moves upwards:

**Magnetic moment and angular momentum**

The magnetic moment has a close connection with angular momentum called the gyromagnetic effect. This effect is expressed on a macroscopic scale in the Einstein-de Haas effect, or “rotation by magnetization,” and its inverse, the Barnett effect, or “magnetization by rotation.

In particular, when a magnetic moment is subject to a torque in a magnetic field that tends to align it with the applied magnetic field, the moment precesses (rotates about the axis of the applied field). This is a consequence of the concomitance of magnetic moment and angular momentum, that in case of charged massive particles corresponds to the concomitance of charge and mass in a particle.

Viewing a magnetic dipole as a rotating charged particle brings out the close connection between magnetic moment and angular momentum. Both the magnetic moment and the angular momentum increase with the rate of rotation. The ratio of the two is called the gyromagnetic ratio and is simply the half of the charge-to-mass ratio.

For a spinning charged solid with a uniform charge density to mass density ratio, the gyromagnetic ratio is equal to half the charge-to-mass ratio. This implies that a more massive assembly of charges spinning with the same angular momentum will have a proportionately weaker magnetic moment, compared to its lighter counterpart. *As it becomes transferred to the MASS envelop that was not in the particle before, but appears in the particle as a resonance of the larger mass that absorbs its formal energy form the magnetic field: µ m = e S*

**The inversions between electromagnetism and gravitation.**

We have insisted many times that when we cross a discontinuum either from s to t or from ∆-1 to ∆+1, there are inversions in motion and form that balance the Universe. This explains why gravitation-strong force is attractive and electromagnetism outside the atom is repulsive.

*The ultimate reason being that within a space-time super organism the tendency is the arrow of information, and between different super organisms the dominant arrow is the selfish arrow; except in cases of parallelism, which allow further social evolution.*

So all inner forces are inward vortices of growing attraction (strong gravitational force) and all outer forces are perceived as repulsive. And it is only in that sense the magnetism, which becomes the ‘next’ implosive force creating new membranes resembles gravitation, but the true equivalence here is between the inner strong atom-galaxy and the inner weak gravitational galaxy-atom forces. *Since magnetism is a ‘scale’ of order within the gravitational galaxy, and hence must have reversed arrows:*

Perhaps of more interest to understand the inversions of symmetry when we move from s to t states, from ∆-1 to ∆+1 in the galaxy atom is to consider *the inverted properties of the atom and the galaxy, which ‘seems’ to be an anti-particle. In the graph, we see the equations of gravitomagnetism and its visual form, which shows the effect on gravitation to be NOT inverse BUT PARALLEL.*

*What this means is that *for individual particles – spinning charges:

Electric repulsion occurs between particles which are spinning in the same direction.

Electric attraction occurs between particles which are spinning in opposite directions.

Rotational attraction occurs between masses which are spinning in the same direction

Rotational repulsion occurs between masses which are spinning in opposite directions.

These forces can be observed between spinning wheels and general relativity describes it for interactions between massive stars.

On the galactic scale where we use gravitoelectromagnetism:

Gravitomagnetic repulsion occurs between masses which are moving in the same direction.

Gravitomagnetic attraction occurs between masses which are moving in opposite directions.

So both are inverse. Incidentally this is also the case for strong self-similar forces, called asymptotic freedom: when you try to move away to quarks there is an attraction equivalent to the gravitomagnetic effect.

And we could go on and on with those formal inversions, which are made explicit as general laws for all planes in T.Œ (the most general isomorphic laws between planes).

*Differences between membrains and singularity-minds.*

All this said the ghostly magnetic covers as the protein cover is the worker part but NOT the essential part. Why? Because the *essential action of all beings, reproduction, is performed by the singularities, which have ENOUGH density of information to reproduce. Let us see the previous two cases.*

If we consider the inverse directions, open and closed spirals, Nature seeks one more to balance both; s*o spins and charges act as gender singularities, seeking a balance between both. And often those inverse spins when having enough energy produce a new electron.*

But attraction is always limited by the density of information that saturates a field. So:

Charge repels when density is high.

Charge attracts when density is low.

Now we switch directions up in planes and consider gravity from the microscopic up to the macroscopic. A per gravitoelectromagnetism, gravity is just like electricity and magnetism but with a weaker coefficient, longer interaction distances, and the direction reversed *by virtue of the inversions between planes. So:*

Mass attracts when density is high.

Mass repels when density is low.

But spinning mass warps space in inverse form.

All this happens for all scales and species which will always have an *inner world with a tendency to increase density, and an outer world with a tendency to decrease density; where unless a magnetic-like social force of order appears, will then act with individualistic entropic behaviour.*

And the key *to that inner attractive behaviour is the network density and connectivity. Indeed, in the case of physical forces, the key here is that gluons as neutrinos-gravitons interact also among them; so the density of interaction is huge. And in biological terms, we can draw the immediate comparison with the force-networks, called axions of neuronal systems, which also interact within them, unlike disconnected cells joined by blood networks where the forces (red cells) do not interact. In other terms: the ∆+1 strong-graviational inner world and its ∆-1 gluon-neutrino axons are far more connected, tighter, able to grow in density as singularity, informative systems, vs. the more herd-like, entropic>energetic external forces in a herd of individual ‘charges’ or cells.*

Those vital organic reasons – the whys of mathematical descriptions – are the fundamental revelations brought about by ∆•st.

**∆•st view: MEMBRANE FORCES VS. SINGULARITY FORCES ≈ENTROPY vs. SOCIAL EVOLUTION.**

Once we have considered a generic analysis of the PHYSICAL T.œs’ duality between strong-gravitational atom-galaxy attractive singularity forces and the expansive electro-magnetic, membrane forces; we can fly upwards into the more general T.Œ VIEW:

So we distinguish ‘four fundamental forces’ of attraction-repulsion (depending on the pov of the observer), *which can be generalised in function – not in topological form, which we have repeated ad nauseam can only be applied exactly to pure forms (or those far away from the human observer, which therefore reduces its perception to pure form, and confuses time fast states with simultaneous space).*

The attraction we deal with is that of a present vital energy-spacetime open ball, which will experience 4 potential forces:

- A force that attracts the system to the ‘protein, time-cycle membrane’; in the atom to the electronic membrane; in the galaxy to the halo – this is a force related mostly to entropic expansion and destruction as ‘space grows’ towards the membrane, which also leave in and out by osmosis of any kind, motion and form.
- A force that attracts the system towards its informative ‘DNA’ singularity; in the atom the strong force to the quarks; in the galaxy the gravitational force to the black hole center – it is a force related to the informative implosion, as time speed grows towards the vortex. It is hence more accelerated than the expansive, decelerating entropically related motion to the membrane. And so it is also related to a growth of density and upwards lifting.

Yet while those membrane-entropic-expansive-decelerating, ∆-1 motion and its inverse ∆+1 informative-singularity-accelerated motions seem the ∆±1 paths, *the fact is both tend to kill, destroy and eat in bits and bites the components of the vital energy, and so they are both selfish, ab=using energy for the singularity and membrane. *

So they tend to be ‘resisted’, by the vital energy, which will itself show when its is ‘heady’ (not a headless automaton, pre-programmed viral cell, human enzyman slavish to its machines, red cell with no nuclei, light wave with a minimalist photon particle and so on). Otherwise it will just flow down or upwards and die.

So we might find two inverse anti forces, which try NOT to send the being either path, and keep it in the middle range balance.

And this is obvious for example in planetary systems which try NOT to fall down the path of the star. But, and this responds to an obvious question – which force is stronger; it ultimately falls into the sun-singularity, as the inward accelerated, compressing force is stronger. So the strong force is stronger than the expansive electromagnetic force that sends you in your way to the electron, and the gravitational force *should be stronger in a similar ‘fine constant’ proportion to the dark entropy forces that are in the galaxy-atom self-similar to the electromagnetic ones and expand space between galaxies.*

Then there is of course for the vital energy quanta of the open ball region forces towards its fifth dimension of social evolution, without MOTION to the singularity but rather ‘collapsing’ of the wave into a particle state; and viceversa, the scattering entropic fourth dimension of downwards dissolution.

When this happens ‘spontaneously’ not caused by the attractive power of membranes and singularities, it is a self-sustained process, which we distinguish by lack of relative motion of the particle towards the $ or ð regions, and because *it is a slower than the fastest of all processes, any process of death, with an exponential rate of maximal ‘growth’-dissolution (e being the constant of death≈decay). *

**T.œs follow T.Œ isomorphic laws.**

*This is a T.Œ law (T.œ used for particular timespaœrganisms, T. Œ FOR generalisation as the law is an isomorphism that happens in all systems.)*

So for example humans have a pull towards social love (5th dimension), a fear but unavoidable end into an entropic explosion, often caused by the larger whole, its nation, which sends you packing to the border/membrane where the hard proteins/weapons/electronic wall will likely kill you; or to the seemingly nicer central black hole; where the legal government will ‘jail you’ in a dense, quiet ‘hole’.

Do NOT be surprised we use often human comparisons, because that is the ULTIMATE MESSAGE OF T.Œ, we are all just time§pace beings subject to the same laws. Humans simply see more detail about themselves and simplify all other forms.

So the star falling in the black hole, the carbohydrate packed to serve the DNA and the man jailed for wanting r=evolutionary freedom, or the planet converted by ACCELERATORS into strangelets going to the halo of the galaxy, the photon sent to the electron, or the soldier going to defend the border ARE isomorphisms. So it is the bosonic piling of atoms or souls into a larger whole, subconscious collective god.

As we are working the physical world we shall not dwell on the injustice of national membranes and capitals ab=using the human lot and sheeple with financial and military zeal… But obviously to be ‘a solar system’ in the wilderness of the less dense, less informed open ball territory of a galaxy, or a photon in the atom-galaxy, its equivalent; is NOT the best position of the organism which is all about ‘membranes and singularities’, DNA and proteins, working together, strangelet halos and black holes, military borders and financial capitals.

The democratic placebo vote, the ‘permission’ to exist of the open ball, is just the wisdom of the singularity and membrane which has its ‘farming region’ in the middle to store its vital energy and slowly feed on, but ultimately *it will devour it all and without ‘pressure/density’ the emptied vital energy of the present body-wave will collapse and the membrane wrinkle, warp and the singularity without protection and feeding energy bust. Alas, death is the necessary reward to the abusive singularity-mnds that stiffen into stoppage, the vital energy of the re=productive body-wave and working class.*

So the strong/gravitational force sends you packing to the centre, the electromagnetic/dark entropy to the membrane and beyond into the coldness of infinite distances between galaxy-atoms; and no more translative forces are needed.

*As the weak force is NOT A FORCE, it has no range in space, it lasts much longer in time, as its coupling constant is indeed expressed in time intervals. And so it is a huge error of ‘space physicists who always want to transform time dimensions and processes into spatial rods, to treat weak forces as ‘fields’ (Higgs field) as spatial forces, by lack of time understanding.*

For an even more detailed break-down, we can consider *actually the 3 forces as dual scaling forces.*

So the strong force sends you to the centre, but *its membrane emerges from it as the nuclear force that encloses gluons and quarks in the centre of particles.*

Then the same concept works with charge, the singularity and membrane, the magnetic field, which ’emanates’ from the electric force; as an intermediate stage between the atom-galaxy and the galaxy-atom.

And finally the gravitational force sends you to the enter and the higgs field/dark entropy works outside the membrane.

And so we find then the proper formalism and parallelisms. I.e. the graviton has 2 spin but the Higgs outside is a 0 scalar. So happens to the gluon that has a light ‘graviton-like’ 2 spin and a heavy scalar highs-like 0 spin.

Of this conundrum only a correction is needed, regarding the graviton-neutrino which now is considered to be a 1 spin; but to correct that in meaningful ways we would need a huge leap into the formalism of quantum physics, which we avoid in purpose to show how meaning can be given conceptually with basic maths, when we upgrade our understanding of them.

While the thermodynamic arrow *is not entropy but the clever molecular region, and resistance of the weak ud-beings to be packed in flocks to their death by excessive information or excessive entropy in the **centre/membrane; and parasite as long as it lasts all other forces. So when you heat a system, gravitation misses the gaseous motion; magnetic fields are expelled by the Curie effect, beyond a Curie temperature. *

The game is just and the open ball is often left its own ‘space’ to cultivate its ghostly motions and forms – us.

Now of course, the ‘creationist view of egocentered humans’ about reality with man as the only sentient being with organic properties imposed by western cultures will have none of it. If taoism->buddhism would have spread as the substrata of our science and not yhwh the pantheist, organic sentient Universe that all of us, the masters of time-space models, consider the only rational explanation of reality would have prevailed, and man probably would have a longer future in this lost rock of the emptiness (Leibniz>Einstein>ls)

**The Rashomon effect on electromagnetism. Ternary arrows of time: st-fields, s-potentials and t-charges.**

Nt. We use often the term field instead of potential to describe the entropic scale, ∆-2 from where a system obtains its motion, as physicists tend to confuse both terms. Probably it would be better to use the term ‘potential’, instead of field, which I will from here on -T.œ being always in flux as it is the singularity-mind still of a single human being):

It follows from what it has been said, that there should be at least 3±1 formulations of the electromagnetic field in terms of the 3 arrows of time, as it is the case:

** S-Potential. ST-field, tƒ: charge:** three approaches are customarily discussed, as the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic vectorial fields (present wave, st, the commonest), potentials (fields proper, the entropic, scattered solution), and charges with currents (the tƒ solution).

It should be notice that the Potential $pe description must have less ‘dimensions/ parameters’ than the wave description. As a general rule deduced from the properties of space and time, ‘entropy has the minimal number of dimensions, 2, for each ‘bidimensional field’, in this case 4 parameters; while the ST-liquid/wave description as a general rule must have the whole S≈T ternary symmetry effect, 3+3 parameters. And such is the case, the electric and magnetic fields together had six components to solve for. In the potential formulation, there are only four components:

**the quantum potential**

While the above presentation introduced the guidance equation as fundamental, the quantum potential For the phase of the wavefunction holds:

∂S (∇S)² h²∇²R −∂t=2m+V−2mR .

Due to the similarity with the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation (for the action S) the term ∝ h ̄2 has been baptized quantum potential . Within the Hamilton- Jacobi theory the particle velocity is constraint to m·v = ∇S, which corresponds to the guidance equation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory. If one adopts the quan- tum potential formulation the motion along the Bohmian trajectories can be thought of as taking place under the action of a novel quantum-force . However, the guidance equation can be motivated e.g. by symmetry arguments (Dürr/Goldstein/Zanghi, 1992) and needs no recourse to the Hamilton-Jacobi theory. Moreover, in Goldstein (1996) it is argued that the quantum potential formulation is misleading since it suggests that the deBroglie-Bohm theory is just classical mechanics with an additional potential (or force) term. But the deBroglie-Bohm theory is a rst-order theory (i.e. the velocity is constrained by the position already) and this important trait is disguised in the quantum potential formulation.

Whether this ambiguity in the formulation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory should be viewed as a substantial debate or a secondary matter depends on the context. These two readings of the theory have certainly a great deal in common and in comparing the de Broglie-Bohm approach with standard quantum mechanics the distinction between these di erent schools is usually irrelevant. However, more detailed discussions which involve subtleties regarding e.g. the status of the wavefunction or particle properties have to pay attention to these di erences.

**∆§:** The four fundamental approach in classic electromagnetism is the current description, which is *the social scaling of electricity.*

• The mind approach, includes the human pov deformation from the perspective of our tools of measure. It is the 4 vector solution of relativity, which roughly speaking can be considered the ∆• mind solution as it introduces the paradoxes of ‘mind stillness’ in the measure of beings (paradox of Galileo).

**THE RELATIVE INFORMATION EXTRACTED BY ANY SINGULARITY.**

The mind approach is far more important than we think, beyond the specifics of relativity because *it is constantly present when we realise humans are an electronic mind. And by lacking this view, physicists who sponsor mathematical creationism=reductionism and naive realism miss very often the point of study; that is, PUT IN NEGRITA AND CAPITALS AS IT IS THAT IMPORTANT:*

**‘ANY HUMAN MEASURE IS A PARTIAL POINT OF VIEW OF THE ELECTRONIC MIND’**

This is never present in physical thought but is the key to establish meaning. I.e. why quantum physics is quantised around h-planck the angular momentum, which is ultimately a singularity view of @-electron (electronic minds), as it considers the membrane time cycle, its density of information (mass, etc.) and the singularity point, with its perpendicular radius. The answer is EVIDENT: Because OUR mind TIME-CLOCK is an ~~h~~-quanta of angular momentum. So our mind ‘processes’ in its minimalist element spin-bits of time-information. And thus the ‘mind-view’ is there. So it is as we have shin in the ‘rod’ of human space, which is c; and so h/c², and hc as we shall observe are key ratios of the mind, its basic species a Planckton: hc, and its Lobachevski’s ratio of curvature of our mind-view, which is flat, with minimal curvature, etc. etc. subtle themes never occur to naive realists:

In the graph 30 years old (might have thus a different jargon), one of the first insights on the quantum uncertainty principle, which obviously is due to our uncertainty of view. So all kind of quantum paradoxes require indeed an observer point of view, but not creationist and egocentered – IT IS NOT THE ENTITY WHICH IS UNCERTAIN BUT THE HUMIND VIEW that extract a limited information.

It is then natural to assess the importance h-planck and similar parameters related to the humind electronic pov.

**∆+1: gravitational, Mechanical system. ****Ternary parts: The geometric view. Kepler’s laws.**

The first laws of physics were those of Kepler, and as usual we have our 4 elements, the mathematical • language, the ð-membrane, the first law; the constant ‘bidimensional energy’, the law of equal areas swept by the membrane-particle, the planet

The sun-Earth system which represents in this case, the singularity and one of the inner membranes of th system em form a conic ellipse in its orbit, which sweeps equal areas in equal time, L²=T.

And this is the first interesting realisation of the laws of ternary systems: what is CONSTANT IS NOT THE SPEED of the membrain but the ‘field of vital energy’, it constantly ‘encloses’ perpendicularly feeding the system.

defines a gravitational field, caused by the curvature, G, of a vortex-gradient towards the sun in which the cube of an orbital distance equals the square of its period T²=L³, where we wrote in terms of dimensionalities the 2nd and 3rd laws:

Usually these laws which can be deduced from Newton’s are merely considered cases of its 3 laws, but they need some comments on GST grounds.

First, 2nd Law: to notice the bidimensionality of space-time, as what it is proportional is the area, not the length; so the ‘region’ captured, and encircled between the planet and the sun, is an aerolar, bidimensional surface. What is then the purpose of those orbits? Here we escape the mechanical paradigm into the organic one.

Indeed, if we were just to be mechanical, the great question of all those ‘solar systems’ is why *planets do not collapse and feed the suns that attract them but ‘manage’ to form, quasi-stable orbital structures. Yes, with very complex models scientists have achieved a mechanical description, but the organic vital paradigm does not require a mechanical how but a purpose:*

The sun at the singularity, tiƒ focus, the planet as the limiting membrane and the bidiemensional, region with a gravitational field that provides motion to both, is a canonical ternary structure, parallel to that of charges at focus, with a limiting enclosure of magnetic nature, or cells with DNA at its centres and an enclosure of proteins, galaxies, with black holes at its center and a limiting halo-membrane likely of strangelets, with region within from where they extract entropy and energy to move and reproduce.

As solar systems do NOT reproduce, they just need to encircle an entropic field of motion and that is what the sun with the help of its planets do, extracting then from equal areas, bidimensional entropy for its motion. How this is done is only a guess, as invisible gravitational ∆-4 scales are not experimentally known.

A quantum gravity theory should likely include neutrinos. We are not in this ∆-4 detailed description here (first post of last line). The logic parallel with a charge field is that the sun is immersed in some short of ‘physical’, real lines of force made of some short of small planck-scale quanta of gravitation, within the much larger, dominant ‘galactic field’. As we shall see latter the relativity c-speed constant is an artefact of measure; so it does not invalidate beyond abstract measure of distances and speeds, relative to the human electronic frame of reference, the likely existence of this gravitational flow ‘screened’ by planets, below the scale of light space-time.

The 3rd law involves the understanding of the vortex in pure time terms as an accelerated time-scale.

G is the curvature of a gradient field, in ∆-4, invisible to us, accelerated inwards, topologically equivalent to a time-clock of the cosmological ∆+4 scale. And this will be the basis for its unification by self-similarity between scales with the ∆±3 world of electromagnetic charges. G is the curvature equivalent to k in charges, which seen as motion form a gradient with an accelerated clock time inwards, and this ‘curvature’ hence as a gradient can be seen the accelerated motion upwards on a conic, hence never able to trace a perfect circle in the ‘world cycle clock’ of the conic; and this distortion added to the similar distortion of the biggest field of the galaxy, in which the sun system is explains why it is an ellipse (a plane cutting a conic with an angle) and not a circle.

**RECAP. Ratios not absolute parameters ****matter.**

The events of physics ALWAYS involve as any other case, changes of entropy=motion, energy=momentum and information between ∆-scales. And as *all scales of the Universe are relative, we cannot really talk of absolute quantities, even if certain scalar magnitudes might seem as such; but always of ratios between scales, which are always limited given the fact those ratios are ‘human measures’ by the ultimate limits of our perception, where we find Universal constants, which are in fact ‘limits’ (as opposed to ratios that **have variance) on the galactic upper and atomic lower bound. *

Absolute relativity ads relativity of scale and hence defines only relative magnitudes which are constant ratios of the three arrows of time (expansive entropic, gaseous states, attractive, ‘solid’ vortices of information and liquid/wave states) that travel in a single plane (mostly wave-present states) or through scales, downwards (mostly entropic states) or upwards (solid/vortex states).

It is thus much better to study physics with ratios such as density (a ratio) instead of mass (a scalar parameter), heat, instead of temperature and so on. They are in fact much more useful for dynamic processes, as the equations of continuity and motion show.

*RATIOS not absolute values are the main constants of mathematical physics.*

Ratios such as c-speed of light, S/Ti, or speed of transmission of information, and density, M(t)/V(s), or density of gravitational information per volume of space are the real mathematical parameters and standing points which define a time§pace world cycle of a physical supœrganism:

S≈t, t/s and s/t become the steady state variable, speed-entropy variable, and density-information variable ratios of more value for the study of GST physics, which classic physics uses AS the concepts of speed-length (s/t) and mass-density (t/s) Or frequency.

*It is then when we explore in mathematical physics the main equations of each scale when the ‘parallelism’ of physical systems will become evident; and its main mathematical instrumental, partial differential equations, of first degree or second degree, and its inverse integrals, will appear in each relative scale, as the proper ∆-equations to define the exchanges of entropy (second order equations), energy (first order), or information (inverse to those of entropy), which become the ‘actions’ of survival of physical systems that allow them, as any other system does, ‘Tœ∫exi∂st’ in an organic form.*

**How minds and languages measure time. **

We can now return to the ‘quantitative’ analysis of how we measure time-cycles. We say each species has different clocks. And so it follows that each one measures time in a different speed. But what is then the measure of time-cycles? Both the speed of time-thoughts, that is processes of information, and the body-speed in its time-actions.

So to quantitatively measure in detail the timespace cycles of a being, we must consider 2 fundamental elements:

- Synchronicities: that is the different speeds of the clocks of body-waves, fields-limbs and particles-heads, which most times will be synchronized. So for example, de Broglie showed that the wave-particle and field of a quantum system are synchronised. So are your steps, heart beats and mind thoughts.
- And the different actions of the being, which is the ‘substance of its time cycles, and will become the
*unit of time-space measure both subjectively and often objectively when we observe other systems – i.e. in quantum physics the unit is h, which measures ‘actions’ and also ‘angular momentum’ that is essentially the cyclical motion of the quantum physic system.*

**• The humind bias.**

The conclusion is obvious: the humind biases our perception of Nature *specially in physics, because we do NOT care about the organic, pan psychic nature of matter, and as we do not see the mind mappings of the singularity, by definition a ‘single quanta of space-dilated in time’ (inverse hence to the event of death, a single quanta of time dilated in space), we are NOT measuring singularities but physical parameters will be related only to two kind of elements:*

**$**-Distance=steps of entropy-motion, related to the field and/or limbs, which is the external parameter of the being, physics is more concerned with.

**ð-**Frequency=cycles of the external membrane, often related to distance, when the membrane is both translating in space and turning in time (wheel motions); which *is related to the singularity we do not see, as both are connected and in **synchrony. *

And 2 of its energetic combinations, which physics measure to extract mostly entropy-motion and discharge form as in all feeding/predatory processes where you discharge the ‘head’ without much entropy by definition and eat the rest:

**ST:** Total Vital Energy, which we often kill and so convert into pure entropy, measuring=extracting only the motion and discharging the form.

**Å; @:** And its ‘actions’ of ‘energy and time’ directed with a survival purpose by the mind, which is behind the system, but we repeat, we do not perceive in space due to its size, and we deny in its will and time spread through scales of the fifth dimension, which humans do not understand.

The graph illustrates the difference between both: If we consider a cellular entity of n small infinitesimal parts/cells, *the action* will correspond to the ‘small cycle’ that measures the ‘frequency of the minimal unit and roughly its inner content; while the whole will represent the total energy of the system.

So what parameter will be good to measure those 2 elements? Within the constrictions of physics, the commonest parameter is angular momentum, r m v, as it measures the radius, the energy-mass of the membrane’s cell (∆-1) and its ‘frequency in time’ or ‘volume of population in space’.

So we will find equations of the form:

*Energetic entropy = Constant of information (∆-1 cell) x frequency of populations in space (energy volume)*

*Energetic entropy = Constant of angular momentum x revolutions in time (membrane’s or action measure)*

As in E=hv or E=nKT.

Another good measure which will also remain constant is Kepler’s second law aerolar surface.

If we ad the uncertainties of measures through scales, which physicists resolve with normalisation procedures, which become approximations, physics becomes then clearly contrary to belief, in terms of information the less exact of all sciences; as *it does not extract all but a small part of the total information of the being.*

Yet, as it extracts the simplest parameters of the being, those which are the essential ‘primary substances’ it is on the other hand the more regular in its constants of measure; since it analyses the most ‘extended’, efficient simple forms of Nature, with minimal variations.

*Relationship between force and energy and momentum.*

So the parameters used by man in physics correspond to the ternary parts of an ∆st system.

Energy or present conserved cycles has as minimal unit a quanta of momentum, which it integrates. E=∫p

Energy is though balanced, but if we *extract and *transform one of its dimensions of space in time-motion, we obtain force:

E= m v²= m l²/s² -> E/l = F = m a.

Thus *we have not really eliminated the length but transformed it into acceleration, which is in itself a new vortex, within a fixed point, and so, a force is present energy transformed into future time.*

Thus in dealing with the equations of mathematical physics, the reduced description of super organisms of physical space-time, by the egotist humind view of reality, all the laws of 5D³ systems apply, even if we only care to extract information that matter to us, and information about its motion-translations in space.

This means we are in a scalar Universe were all magnitudes are relative ratios, which means they are not ‘absolute constants’ as most people believe but proportions between scales, with *limits that are equivalent to the singularity, informative and external membrane of an open ball, a classic ternary systems, similar to any other one in the Universe.*

In the case of the galaxy-atom – the ∆±3 scale which humans are enclosed on, those two limits are the <0K T, which should operate beyond the c-horizon of the black hole event and that c-horizon, which acts as the maximal speed of the galactic membrane. Within those limits we exist – and obviously we don’t recognise them.

Let us then get into the ‘knots and bolts’ of mathematical physics, now that we have the minimum understanding of the Universe and its 5D³ laws.

**Main magnitudes of $, ð and ST (actions and energies).**

This said we can start the fun, relating classic physics to GST.

FIRST WE CONSIDER the obvious equivalence between the 3 magnitudes needed to describe e any equation of physics in each scale: a time parameter (frequency, temperature), a space parameter (distance, speed) and an ∆-scale parameter (mass or charge). It is perhaps the simplest obvious proof of the correspondence of physics and GST.

Indeed in the graph, we see that physics is all about 6 simple magnitudes, and they are simpler for PURE space-entropy and PURE time/form:

**$:** Length-speed to Pure space, (when we consider the paradox of relativity or Galileo paradox, which makes them 2 sides of the same coin). As entropy has the minimal number of dimensions (so do any limb/field parameter in any system)…

**ð:** Then we have a MAGNITUDE to measure PURE cyclical time frequency, ‘time’-DURATION, the ‘humind’ parameter for FREQUENCY the real one such as T=1/ƒ.

It is therefore the main parameter of the ‘membrane’ of the system, the frequency of the wave that envelops it, or the frequency of a circular motion that repeat itself.

So those 2 parameters are fairly straightforward as they are ultimately pure one-dimensional length and numerical frequency, and in certain way we can consider them due to *such purity, also the pure parameters of mathematical geometry, the line, and mathematical time, the number. Which again shows the experimental nature of pure mathematics.*

**∆±i:** And then we are left with four parameters, *all of them related to the third element of reality, for each scale, energy.*

Now, here is where all the complexity comes as humans are a complete ‘mess’ in their definition of energy, sometimes confused with entropy as in e=mc2 explosions, sometimes confused with informative parameters, as when in that equation they consider mass, which is a singular vortex. So in practice, the four parameters of scale have many interpretations and each one will need a bit of thought in its own:

**∆+3,4:** Mass is related to the maximal scale, and equivalent to energy on that gravitational, galactic scale. Hence its ‘weakness’ when perceived from our point of view as a force, since in fact is a parameter of an informative attractive, accelerated singularity, closer to the parameter of frequency time in that largest scale. As acceleration (seen in motion), is itself equivalent to curvature (acceleration seen static – paradox of Galileo), mass is therefore more of a time parameter for an upper scale. But *as we are ultimately inside the galaxy where the mass parameter measures the vortex, it is not so easy to perceive as a frequency, accelerated vortex, smaller and easier to visualise, or as the frequency of a wave-present state. *

**∆±1:** Next Temperature, is also a parameter in our human scale of the energy carry by the system but his vibrational speed (Hence carrying both motion and form, which are the two elements of present-energy T x S parameters),, since even in gases, we obtain it from the repetitive collisions we measure on the motion of entropic gases confined within a ‘volume’; so with form.

**∆-2:** It comes then charge, which we measure not in Particle, Tiƒ state, but as intensity of a wave-flow of electrons, and corresponds obviously to the quantum scale.

**∆-3:** And finally we measure candelas of luminous intensity for the minimally observed scale, the ∆-3.

So while each of those parameters of scale does have its complexity as they are quite arbitrary choices of humans, they do their job giving man a reference to each of the four scales of reality.

**∆±4:**Obviously the dark world is NOT measured, but we do have actually a measure of the distance/acceleration/motion of entropy between galaxies, on the dark entropy, wrongly called dark energy of the galaxy a hole in relative balance with its mass in a proportion of 3 to 1, which seems to give more value to entropy forgetting that in fact, this is *a dimensional measure,, and while we see the full dimensionality of vacuum space, mass is measured by man with a single dimension/scalar number that warps the other ones. *

*So in fact, the proportion is 1 to 1 and the Universe never expands nor it contracts.*

So those are the parameters of physics that suffice also in GST to explain once the concepts are streamlined, the structure of reality in each scale and its generator equations and events, sub equations of the generator.

We can then move to define all kind of equations of each scale in terms of those parameters and show they respond to isomorphisms actions and laws of any other super organism of the Universe.

In that regard, when the proper understanding of present states of energy are considered, it is better to use composite of two of such parameters, as momentum (the simpler present parameter, as energy will be its integral through a conservative time cycle).

To understand think on the ‘sentence’ every yin has a yang, so energy are entropic motion with little form, and in/form/ation, forms with little motions and both type of parameters, with ‘mixed’ e x ƒ elements *are chosen by humind membrains depending on the ‘use’ we have for such scales. *

And so we shall generally ascribe mass as a measure of time-frequencies or accelerated clocks with little motion, temperature as a measure of entropic motions with little form, while electric current and candela more ‘balanced’ measures of energy on those scales.

All those questions about what physicists measure with their huminds, in which moments and states, for which duration (momentum being a present quanta of time, energy its whole worldly, mass measuring an enclosure, though self-centred into a singularity which actually is a zero point of no attraction mass, and so on, shows how ambivalent is the supposed perfectly known human physics…

**Extension of the metric. The main equations of mathematical physics in the three scales.**

H, k, µ, K, C and G are the 6 more important constants of Nature. As we have already unified k and G as the constants of curvature=acceleration of the singularities of the quantum and galactic scale, our interest shall focus in the other four as the Proportionality constants that measure the present space-time of the four fundamental scales of the Universe.

Each of those proportionality constants can be seen from 4 perspectives according to the Rashomon effect as:

∆: constants of proportionality of each scale and as such as:

Est: Parameters of Energy (space-time present), which therefore will be composed of:

T: Frequencies of time (Time Cycles) &

S: Units of distance (Entropic past)…

So those four perspectives are fundamental to understand them.

Moreover as each constant can be considered from a ‘material perspective’ as the Unit of space-time of each scale, which ultimately form the parts of the unit of the next scale, each of the constant will be multiplied by a human character of population in space or frequency in time to give birth to the unit of the next scale. So:

h x quantiser ≈ k x quantiser ≈ µ x quantiser ≈ C x quantiser = Mass

This is the ideal understanding of those constants, according to 5D³. But human perception of those scales might be distorted in many ways as we know, so our parametrisation. Thus the study of those scales through its constants of action *is a form of deep thought to comprehend also how the human light>electronic mind measures and perceives the Universe. In the next graph we observe the human mind equations and parametrisation of those constants.*

In the graph, the four fundamental constants that define 5D metric equations on the 4 planes of the fifth dimension.

The Planck constant is the ∆-2, quantum constant of proportionality between its entropy and information. We shall call a Planckton.

The Boltzmann constant is the ∆-1 thermodynamic constant or Bolton.

The magnetic constant is the ∆+1 electric constant or magneton

The c constant is the dark world constant or Ceton.

Finally the Planck Units, which eliminate the humind membrain bias to fully grasp the meaning of the parameters of physics:

We have now all the elements needed to understand in ∆st terms the supœrganisms of physics in each scale. LET’s the games begin!

The first thing we notice reinforcing our Unification equation is that in Planck units the equations for mass and charge, are essentially the same, √~~h~~c divided by the curvature constant of each scale, G or 4πk (eo=1k). As G has incorporated in its newtonian deduction 4π, they are indeed both the same. So *our analysis was correct, both scales are merely differentiated by the curvature, which by the Galilean paradox are also equivalent to acceleration, (and in fact treated in both cases with second derivatives, which ‘extract’ the ‘essence’ of a system up two scales/dimensions).*

This solved, obviously the interest concentrates on ~~h~~c, the product of the absolute minimum quanta of space and the absolute maximal quanta of space perceived by the electronic humind membrain. As h is the minimal unit of information and c the maximal unit of reproduction, we can see this product as the ‘complementarity spin-particle-angular momentum x energy-bodywave system of physical nature.

This is thus the ‘real thing’. The ultimate PlanCkton, the body-head supœrganism of the physical Universe; and *when we carve=curve it on the small world, we get a charge, and when we ‘feed it’ into the large world we get a mass.*

Simple, isn’t?

When charges are measured in units of qP, we have e = 0.30282212088 as in vital ‘mathematics’ we systematically deny ‘scaling’ beyond the 3 ∆-scales of a real supœrganism, (those smaller decimals are at best perturbation effects of other scales), numerology and exactitude in decimals becomes irrelevant beyond the second decimal. So e=0.30, o.3 Planck charges.

In other words, 10 e = 3 Planck charges & 10/3 quark charges = 3 Planck charges.

If you distribute them through different ‘dimensions’, of space-time, you can then see them really meaning the same. I.e. 3 quarks in a temporal sequence give you an electron, 3 electrons in a temporal sequence, plus a quark gives you the ‘whole’ Planck charge, that you must consider then to be the full ‘body-head’ charge of the atom.

This natural unit of electric charge, 3 electrons + a quark must then be considered as the *next scale of organisation of hc*

And so this solved; we must deduce the same concept for mass, where the Planck mass is so huge that it must by force relate NOT to the scale we live in but to the next scale which is the Black hole intergalactic scale. So the Planck mass is the bare minimum black hole unit, and mass, again appears as a cosmological constant, the absolute maximal perceived on the galactic scale – we being, residual resonances of that mass higher world.

So we can envision our known Universe as made of a fundamental being, the PlanCkton, with an h first head photon, followed by a tail of light space-time… *with parameters of Energy and Distance…*

**The quantum world… The photon and electron super organism, its conversion and actions.**

Each of those constants must be then understood as a partial view of the generator equation of the T.œ of the quantum scale. Specifically the time space organism we are observing is the photon which is a complex entity, but the amplest minimal being of our light>electronic universe.

It is then when the fundamental elements of the quantum world studied by physicists appear, *as evolutions, symmetries and entities constructed from the fundamental PlanCkton*.

As we can discharge, the *units of the galactic scaling that do NOT belong to the quantum world. So*, MKS is no longer appropriate when studying physics at the microscopic level (atom, nucleus, nucleons, quarks, etc …). Now the basic units are the electron-volt (eV) and the Fermi (F or fm)).

And using the values of h, Planck’s constant and c, the speed of light we obtain in this new system the fine structure constant (α), Bohr radius and the electron Compton wavelength given by equations:

In the graphs we see that the fine structure constant is not ‘a fundamental constant’ in the sense of ‘numerology’ (Eddington, etc.) but merely the feeding ratio which builds UP the electron as a dense cloud of photons curved by the k-constant.

Which leads to an *essential need for understanding what combinations of dimensional parameters in physics are ‘meaningful’ to describe ‘whole super organisms of space-time’. So we must seek for combinations that describe an Spe x Tiƒ field-particle duality or an ST merged wave. and those are the Ke², hc, GM combinations with a ‘curvature-acceleration-time future parameter’ (k, h, g) and an energy element (e,c,m).*

The first of those is thus the hc, ‘head of angular spin=photonic state, tail of wave-distance motion’ system. And not surprisingly is the ‘densest-smallest’ in potential information, when measured in terms of ‘energy-distance’.

*of 5D metrics again: volume in space (Spe) / angular acceleration (third kepler’s law, definition of a vortex of time). In the graph we can see that law, the first realisation of 5D metric, as the different planets are ordered in a vortex of increasing speed, the closer it comes to the Earth. When the vortex is in balance the orbit closes into itself, but all vortex are by definition minimally accelerated, so those planets will end up being swallowed by the planet.*

**the hc, photon, the ke² electron and the gM mass,**where one component is as a ‘still dimensional perception’ curvature, as a moving perception a parameter of accelerated time clocks, and the other a parameter of a ‘wave volume’ constrained by the force.

**Similarity and Symmetry confused with equality.**

*So we enter in the analysis of the table of elements and its social scales, §, within the same intermediate physical plane, ∆0, sandwiched between the realm of hc and the realm of Gm, in the realm of ke², our mind-world.*

So the first supœrganism of reality is the hc planCkton but we cannot see it, only measure it externally through the ‘angular momentum’, the spin of its scanning head, and its body-wave, as it moves along the path of its quantum potential, ∆-1 scale. We know it will end up becoming part of the electron, its ∆-scale, because it has the same dimensions that the square electron, multiplied by its constant of curvature; hence if the bidimensional wave of the electron is squared to create a three dimensional volume, and the curvature stops the light wave, the transformation is complete, by the 1/137 ratio.

So we write: ∑hc (plancktons) = 3D curved electron. And this is indeed the meaning of an electron nebulae. Today we can observe closely the electron and all what we see indeed is either a nebulae of light or the constant ‘rays’ of light photons ‘trapped into the 3D curved geometry’ of k-urvature.

Now that we know the meaning of those h and c constants and its dual states, as curvature and distance, it is interesting to compare both scales in many ways and we do so by translating the somehow more complex electromagnetic jargon to the ‘simplest’ of all ‘valid’ formulations of a singularity (Rashomon effect), which is Newton’s vortices. It is then interesting to compare the Bohr radius with the Schwarzschild radius, which turns out to be equivalent to a proton vortex of the black hole, cosmological scale: 2GM/c²

We thus have a few basic elements of the 5+5 s≈t light-electron system in place.

**h and c in different versions**

It is also of interest to compare the ‘wave state’ of planckton, hc and the ‘feeding state’ as it feeds a mass: M = ƒ(h/c²), which *keeps absorbing light as angular momentum, *and the third inverse state of mass ‘vomiting’ c² quanta into entropic space M= E/c², which the reader can notice is the same equation but with ‘inverse’ directionality, where now ƒh becomes pure entropy, being expelled from the mass.

So h and c and its relationships with mass are essential concepts of nature.

Indeed we come in contact with the 3 most important constants/parameters of the Human world – our electronic mind perception of the Universe, which is how ultimately our atomic elements and those of digital machines perceive reality. This must be clear: we see our electronic mind-mapping of the Universe, a visual world which misses a lot of reality. Our mind space-time is light and *those 2 constants are the main constants of light; c is the rod-constant of speed-distance-space, and h is the time constant, reason why it is quantised, since ‘clocks’ tic, go and stop and only when they stop we see its hour. Remember the paradox of Galileo: minds perceive information in stillness, and their bodies move them. So quantised parameters are time parameters.*

Moreover h is measured in angular momentum, and so it is a cyclical time parameter, and it is the parameter that processes information, which is the exact meaning of time: the cyclical information stored in time cycles. So as electronic minds which perceive light space-time as information, we have those 2 parameters that will be ever pervading, with so many ‘branchings’ as any time-space system which builds an entire world starting with two single elements. For example, the entire String theory departs from lineal space strings and cyclical time strings; the entire computer ‘world’ is built with O and |. So with h and c we come to construct most of our reality.

This simple truth, which so far escapes physicists is a first conceptual brick to reconstruct our mind-world.

So what h/c² means? There are several ways t explain its meaning. The simplest one is to think on m as we just have described: the curvature/speed (Galileo’s duality: speed=distance) of the vortex of time. So h can be seen as the curvature of time in the quantum realm, c as the speed of propagation of that information in the larger gravitational scale. Another way to see that ratio is to make it homologous to the ‘ratio of Lobachevski’s to define a geometry or ‘mind view’, and it expresses our ‘worldview’ as one very flat, since Lobachevski’s flatness depend on the ratio: Max. flatness=Min. t/Max. S. So humans see a very flat Universe.

One with little curvature, strength, density of ‘mass’; attractive power, speed. But curvature accumulates through frequency. So while <<h/cc means a flat, light universe, the ƒ factor might determine a very dense mass, if its frequency of rotation is huge, as in a tiny black hole with a huge c-speed in the horizon.

So we live sandwiched between a minimal quantum clock, h, or more exactly ~~h~~, a radian, 57º, which can be considered as the angle of ‘vision’ of the Planckton entity, similar to the angle of vision of most ‘life beings’, like the horse in the graph.

Notice that the horse has two eyes and a binocular view with an h/2π= ~~h.~~ So we could say it has a ‘head-spin’ of h/π.

Consider now a ‘one eyed’ horse-head/particle, it would have an h/2 spin, which would Handicap his view. Now translate this homology to the particle. A boson has more spin, it is a better form to move than a fermion. If you bring closer two one-eyed horses chances are they collide. You cannot bring closer two fermions, they will annihilate together. But the more ‘visual’ bosons can walk in huge packed herds. Those HOMOLOGIES are serious. If we accept that all space-time beings have their laws derived from its substances, time-clocks do ‘perceive’ and process information through its pi apertures.

On the other hand, c comes from the largest possible world we perceive, the border between the gravitational and light world. As such it is a constant of length-speed, which c-speed coming from the larger scales of the galaxy and the dark world beyond.

Remember – smaller systems process faster information so our quantum of time-information had to come forcefully from our ∆-i scales; and larger beings have more distance-entropy>energy, and so our c-speed comes from the larger∆+i galactic scale.

And with those 2 elements, as computers do with O and | and strings with lines and cycles, we construct the Universe.

The electron thus needs at least 2 ‘quantum numbers’ for its body-wave state spin and its particle-head state spin. The body wave spin represents its energy, the particle spin represents its information. And, departing from it, it deploys the simplest of all actions as it absorbs a spin of angular momentum to fill the converging gap till arriving to the singularity.

And vice versa, when emitting an action, outwards, the particle state of an electron, will deliver in a quantum of time, a single quantum action of an h-planckton of entropy> energy: e=hƒ.

As te Unit of time and energy, both thus differ, as energy *is the whole value of an entire world cycle, and an action a minimal part of the whole; so in the energy formulae, h is complete, in the spin, is a smaller part.*

How then the mass relates to the spin if the mass is the largest possible angular momentum, in the galactic scale? We need thus an intermediate state, to ‘sip’ some of the energy-momentum of the spin, through the magnetic/thermodynamic intermediate scale. And this happens indeed, as the spin is connected to a magnetic field that puts the spins of electrons or particles in resonance and simultaneity. Then it extracts from the the energy that the magnetic field itself looses to the mass field that surrounds magnetic fields. So energy-motion sips forward.

Think then of the magnetic and mass vortex as the ‘envelops: the magnetic cyclical flow ‘parasites’ as envelop the spin charge, and the mass cyclical vortex parasites the magnetic flow. And this is expressed in a simple equation µ m = e S; and the various effects which seem to confirm the magnetic field *makes appear ‘mass’, hence absorbs energy to make it become ‘mass’, in smaller particles, and transfers its magnetic momentum to angular mass momentum in a lot of processes.*

So membranes ‘absorb energy-momentum’ from smaller scales emerging as a new vortex, and this is what we show in the last picture of a thermodynamic vortex, the best observed, made of smaller ‘action vortices’ converging towards its singularity.

And we will return to those ‘concepts’ in the 4th line, studying its mathematical formulae to fill it with concepts. Enough to say that we have 3 basic eddies of time:

∆-1> h-photons, electrons whose magnetic momentum orders millions of atoms into the ∆-scale, which transfers by way of studied phenomena, such as the giro magnetic effect and the g-ratio, its motion to the mass-vortex…

In that regard, as we study in depth those scales it will be apparent that magnetism brings ‘order’ information, while the electric field brings entropy, motion and heat in larger measure, and in general terms those are the dualities and ‘scalar’ flows: information flows from spin to magnetic fields to mass; entropy>energy flows from the quantum potential to the quantum orbital body-wave part of the electron, to the electric hot field, to the light side of the e=mc2, properly written as M<<cc.

This is the ‘simple scheme’ of emergence of information and entropy through the scales. The details of course and the variation on those dual, inverse arrows are enormous but that is the task of the ‘details’ done by physicists with astounding merit and detail. A philosopher of science must respond to the homologic whys and the properties of the ultimate substances space and time.

And now for the spooky effect of that transfer, which is THROUGH RESONANCE, that is simultaneous synchronised motion, bring about by the magnetic field, which in this manner perceives and imitates the turning around and will transfer itself to the mass, whose full comprehension requires a thorough analysis of the equations of gravitomagnetism and electromagnetism, similar but with inverse rotational orientations, a clear inversion between scales that makes possible to ‘evolve into new scales of the fifth dimension’ as also fermions can do, so we have also a chain of beings:

On one hand, spin 1, no mass, never closed into a full circle -photons (bosons) and gravitons (whose spin 2 on relativity is open to discussion, specially if we consider the logic choice of neutrinos and the neutrino theory of light, latter discussed in more detail)

On the other side spin 1/2 electrons+quarks (fermions)> atomic and molecular systems; which do NOT travel so much through space, creating it but do travel upwards, in social scales of the fifth dimension, through time.

Enough of this, as it is conceptually more difficult but essential to fully grasp the inverse duality between photons and fermions.

**∆, $, ð, • PARAMETERS: **

**MASS; TEMPERATURE; CHARGE; H**

We already stated that the 3 conservation laws of energy (vital st-present), angular momentum (mind-state) and its inverse lineal inertia (distance-motion) ARE the FUNDAMENTAL proof that the Universe is about those ternary topologies ensembled, reproduced and conserved by nature.

It is then even more inclusive for a *conceptual unification of all forms and parts of physical ðime§paœrganisms, *to start eliminating the jargons of ‘spin, mass, charge’ etc. and talk of the dual singularity-membrain described by angular momentum, the present reproductive energy-wave to describe all ST-systems, and the external potential-field and its quanta of motion to talk of the entropic motion of the being, whose *variations in parameters and scales are due to the self-similarity of a fractal (never equal) and the distortions of the human observer.*

**So in true form we would state that all vortices of time and its singularity membrains are described by an angular momentum, w**hich is conserved as the still mind relationship with its membrane that encloses a vital energy IS constantly repeated and conserved.

And we shall find different expressions of this basic conserved unit, with its multiple mind-roles as the ‘brain of the actions of the system’; hence the main ‘constant’ of all scales, which will be ‘SPIN’ in the quantum scale; ‘electromagnetic field’ (charge singularity surrounded by a magnetic membrane) in the ∆º scale, and mass (center of gravity and enclosure) in the ∆-gravitational scale.

Then we shall have entropic distance measures. *And its combinations to reproduce energy to encase everything else.*

But often we shall find that the fourth dimension of pure entropy (as in e=mcc) is confused with the final outcome – the energy humans convert into for its use. So much work is needed to fully classify (I confess i also commit that error often, confusing motion, which is inertial, ‘compressed’ with entropy which is ‘scattering’) all those elements into the five dimensions of the Universe, from bottom up in a ‘continuous’ manner that often overlaps functions and forms:

**The fourth dimensions**of ∆-1 micro points and herds of entropy that dissolves an ∆0,1 scale into an ∆-1 one, scattering and expanding it. And it corresponds properly with the concept**of potential.****The first dimensions**of ‘tight motion’, with no scattering or ‘distance’ (seen as form) which corresponds to a basic flow of reproduction of information along a path, that imprints the lower scale of ‘entropy’ and molds it, and in physics is mostly referred with**the concept of a field and ‘growth’, or young state of a system.**- The second dimensions of space-time, which is the dimension of balance and reproduction of form which in…
- The
**third dimensions of information and cyclical time accelerates**its ‘frequency’ and finally curves into a vortex that emerges - Into the
**fifth ∆+1 dimension of social growth as a whole particle.**

It is then obvious that the ‘transformations’ of dimensions is a ‘continuous/discontinuous process’, which often confuses terms as each being and event has different ‘intensity’ for each dimension. The most confusing being the first dimensions of lineal motion and growth, which in ‘growth’ are closely connected to the second reproductive dimension and in linearity with the entropic lower scale. *Since ultimately in the Universe all comes in ternary groups, so no dimension in an event that transits-travels through them all is isolated. So we can divide each dimensional time period of that transit in a first second and third sub-set: i.e. the first stage of motion could be closer to entropy, the second to motion proper, the third to reproduction or vice versa. *

All this might irritate the ‘exacting’ quantitative scholar as mumble-rumble but it is his fault not to see conceptually and fill knowledge through concepts, being too one-dimensional in his mental equating of quantity=truth.

Since he lacks subtlety to fully grasp those transitions in conceptual terms. I.e. in the example, the entropy measure of motion IS confused because humans used it to produce energy-work.

So they write e=mcc=hv=knT, but *the real energy has always form and form is specific of each scale so this e is entropy, pure motion which IS what ALWAYS FOLLOW SCALING LAWS.*

IN FACT scaling laws cannot be applied to particles, as form change between planes ONLY the moments of dissolution and reorganisation (entropic states, changes of states) ARE purely scalar S<<>>T phase transitions where all is broken and reordered away, fast and in synchronicity with all scales, in what physicists call a ‘Universal process; name we shall accept as it is indeed a reorganisation at ∆±1 co-existing levels of ALL structures to emerge as a new ‘state’. Do we in our scale change so much in change of phase/age? Obviously not because we are to convoluted and our form is tighter and more connected; reason why also after being in a particle scale/state there is NOT a fourth reorganisation but death – the degree of tightness and connection is maximal and that is the end.

So in each scale of the physical Universe humind formulae must be interpreted on view of those humind limited perceptions of the super organisms of each scale and the ab=use we make of most things as ‘entropy’ that becomes motion and then ‘human energy/work’.

This said obviously as ∆•st is a mature science in its conceptual thirst for new meaning and information, we are not going to work that path of equalisation, just enunciate the obvious truth hat all those parameters and constants will always refer to the ternary structure, and the more complex space-time constants (c-speed, h, etc.) will *play the three roles in different forms and scales.*

Thus for what it has been said the 3 elements will be of the general form:

Entropy (confused with energy and/or extracted of the energy of the being) = Constant of action x frequency/population in ðime§pace.

And those are indeed the fundamental equations of all the scales of physics, *where the only element that is common to all of them is the energy>entropy>motion humans extract of the system, and then quickly evolve it into some useful motion with form or human/mechanical energy.*

∆i energy < ∆i-1 entropy (+ x) Human or instrumental form = energy used by Humans

Because entropy by definition is undistinguishable motion.

While the parameters of frequency change (ƒ, temperature, v, speed)

And the ‘constants of action or momentum’ also change (and the human ways of measure it, with little understanding of its rationale): angular momentum, h; entropic momentum, K, and lineal momentum, mv/2; *in as much as humans have different perception and use for the 3 scales:*

In the lower scale of maximal ∆information, humans *see all systems with a larger curvature, so the unit from where they get their energy>entropy is angular momentum, H.*

In the middle scale akin to the human ∆º thermodynamic scale, humans extract its maximal energy>entropy-motion; so the Units of the constant extracted from studies of gaseous heat, is k, ‘entropy proper’.

And in the larger scale, of larger c-rods of distances, as the constant of speed is so huge, humans see, lineal momentum.

So in an inverse fashion to quantum Copenhagen interpretation in 5D³, IT IS NOT THE HUMAN OBSERVER, so much who modifies the observable, but the relative scale of the observable, with its ‘deformations’ of perception and uncertainties which change our parameters of measure. And so we shall treat now that element before going further, which resumes in the 3 distorted views we have of those scales:

Let us then deal with some elements of that distortion as it is poorly understood when you try to ‘encase’ all the fractal dimensions of each scale into a single space-ccontinuumm and reduce all the different speeds of clocks to a human clock-measure standard (second scale, mechanical clock).

**The 3 elements of the generator in the 3 planes of physical systems.**

There are 3 physical scales, and they can be unified easily with the metric equation of the 5th dimension considering its 3 elements:

ð:an informative quanta, a space quanta and a space-time reproductive quanta. But those quanta are in fact ‘the same’ type of timespace organism only that humans perceive them with a distortion of perspective which in physical systems above and below our thermodynamic more complex scale (more complex, subjectively as we get more information of it) makes smaller systems, faster, perceived as ‘having more curvature’=angular moment, larger systems as longer, meaning with less curvature and systems of our scale with a more definitive task in our case, entropic to feed us with motion. So while H-plancks, c-speeds and K-boltzmanns, the constants of space-time or ratios of the 3 planes of physical systems are equal, we perceive of them a single function:

- H-planck unit of angular momentum, quantised as it is FORM not motion, and hence it is ‘discrete’; which is our source of information.
- k-Boltzmann, which
*we perceive inversely as a source of entropy* - c-speed of light space motion, which is the maximal speed of reproduction of information, which we perceive as a rod of distance-space.

And so together those 2 parameters form the basic ‘equation’ of physics:

~~h~~ (tƒ) x c (Sp) = ∆±1

Also, we do have two different constants of ∆±1 curvature,for the larger gravitational scale, G, and for the lower quantum scale, Ke, which multiplied with the active magnitude or center of the vortex, give us the key values for vortices of time of the quantum and cosmological scales.

Those are therefore the 2 different ‘5D metric constants’, which define the curvature-speed-enclosure-unit of size and time of each of those scales.

Finally outside in the dark world, Λ is the curvature cosmological constant – we shall not though study it in here but in relativity, third line.

So the result of combining those values give us a GM, ke fundamental values to assess the vortices of accelerated time of both scales.

GM = Mass space-time (physical system of the gravitational scale)

Ke(e) = Charge space-time (physical system of the quantum scale).

If we add hc for the quantum scale and Λ Gµv for the dark world scale in the lower and upper levels, we have a ‘picture’ of the space-time organisms of those scales made of the ‘dimensions’ we consider absolute but are relative to minimal elements of reality and maximal ones, emerging as new ‘social scales of ∆±i

Those 2 fundamental ‘entities’ of the physical Universe, are the so called Planck Mass (minimal relevant unit of Mass, which is huge, given the fact mass is really a game of cosmological bodies), and the so called Charge Mass (which is around 11 electron charges, forming the first social scale of charge and electric current of the quantum scale).

Those are therefore the departing physical equations to establish 5D physics as an algebraic structure. Between those scales there is the human thermodynamic scale, which is more complex because we do have al the information about it.

Now the immediate next equations of 5D physics are the different accumulations of masses and charges into larger social beings that keep growing in scales of the 5th dimension, and the translation of classic physical equations to the new formalism.

For example the concept of energy gives us immediately 2 equations closely related to our previous ones:

E= ~~h~~ ω, in the quantum scale, which gives us different values of the intensity of information carried by a physical system of the quantum scale, which grows obviously in intensity as it carries more quanta of information (higher frequency), or in terms of time clocks has a faster accelerated frequency clocks. And: E=Mc(v/2)² in the gravitational scale, which gives us also the density of information of a mass system of the cosmological scale.

Or the concept of unifying masses and charges, by the simple obvious fact that their only difference is to be vortices of space-time of two different scales, with different curvature (G/K). Those are themes though we shall treat in more detail in our 3rd line where we study the main species of the Universe.

*Spe (Space-field-GAS-)<ST(Present-wave-liquid)<Tƒ (future Particle-crystal).*

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5^{th} dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

In that sense, the job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:

[Spe (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(wave-liquid)>Tƒ (Particle-Crystal]û≤|4|

This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.

They are systems in which the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆=Spe x Tƒ = E x I= K, remain invariant.

But what are those constants about?

H is called a constant of action and it is measured in terms of angular momentum, in radians of a cycle, and so it seems to be a term that measures a certain distance or rather ‘plane’ of space, as angular momentum, rp, measures a square defined by the particle in motion (its momentum p) and the radius perpendicular to that motion between the center of the sphere traced by it.

Planck assumed that the sources of radiation are atoms in a state of oscillation and that the vibrational energy of each oscillator may have any of a series of discrete values but never any value between.

This measure of a space-distance or motion, similar words as we can see something in motion or trace of distance it leaves, depending on the detail and speed of perception of the observer (as in the expansion of the space of the cosmos or the line of a car in a still picture at night with slow motion cameras of little detail). In fact the most useful constant is h/4π, which if we consider the surface of sphere, 4πr2 , what h measures, it would make h, the square.

K, in E ≈ kT, is the Boltzmann constant. Based on the work of physicists James Clerk Maxwell of Scotland and Ludwig Boltzmann of Germany, this law states specifically that a system of particles in equilibrium at absolute temperature T will have an average energy of 1/2kT associated with each degree of freedom (or dimension of motion in space of the particle). So we are still roughly considering directions of lineal, spatial motions.

For example, an atom of a gas has three degrees of freedom (the three spatial, or position, coordinates of the atom) and will, therefore, have an average total energy of 3/2kT. So here we are measuring roughly a half volume in space.

And again an associated law, PV= nRT, which related the Pressure in the external membrane that enclosed a Volume of a gas with a constant of space and a vibration in Time; hence V-> nR, P->T, we are also here observing that this ‘flow of energy that moves between sizes’ is related to a parameter of space and time.

And finally c^{2}-speed seems also a constant of distances-actions-motions, also in a bidimensional form, more like a surface than a line.

And so in the 3 scales of relative size, ∆±1, the perceived Universe conserves its formal motions of Energy, as its varies in size in space, compensating that growth with the slow down on the frequency of its time clocks: ∆= Sp x Tƒ:

The metric of the 5th dimension establish directly the co-invariance of time and spatial size (length) of a system. Thus it follows immediately that while T x L = K, both do vary and so the Lorentz contraction and dilation of time is immediate, as T=Tƒ x g; L=Lo / g Hence Tƒ x Lo = T x L = K.

Further on since Tƒ ≈ Mo it follows that mass is a ‘clock-like’ parameter. It is in fact the clock-system of the Gravitational ∆+1 scale.

Thus the previous transformations, which happen when a system in the gravitational scale reaches its limits, can be considered a general case of the much wider transformation that happens at the extremes of any relative plane of existence, not only in physics but in the ‘intelligent, organic Universe’, in any system biological or sociological when a form reaches its limits of internal balance expanding too much their Sp or Tƒ, entropy or form parameters out of balance:

The graph, above (Einstein’s Special Relativity) is thus a case of the graph below (The process of emergence or descend between 2 ∆±1 planes of the 5th dimension). And as such we can consider the 4th dimension of a relative present, simultaneous slice of time, a particular case of the 5^{th} dimension scales, that between the gravitational scale and the cosmological scale above it. The nature of this cosmological scale or dark world will thus be studied in greater detail in the last part of this post.

So as we move from the jargon of physics to the jargon of T.Œ we can consider a much larger picture of the Universe in terms of those 3 parameters, which we shall call, Sp, Spatial Extension (H, K, C in those physical formula), Tƒ, Temporal form (v, T, M in those physical formulae) and Conserved Plane, ∆±n (Energy flow in those physical formula), and write:

**STœ=∑∆c = ∑Spe x Tiƒ**

This is the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆, which structures in different planes, the cellular/quantum; thermodynamic/organic and social/gravitational planes in physical and biological systems.

The metric are lineal, precise in each plane, for a long stretch of size values in ‘constant steps’ of fixed bidimensional size called H, K and C^{2}, which are functions INVERSE to the time clocks they associate with: E=Hv=kT=Mc² <= > H ≈ E/v, K ≈ E/T, C^{2} ≈ E/M.

But in the transitions between scales the metric break the balance between the 2 parameters of Spatial Extension and temporal information of the system.

And so the laws of Energy conservation in physics are part of a wider Universal Law, for all scales of size, and systems that conserve its quantity of motion and form, E, often dissociated into a parameter of constant bidimensional space, made of discrete intervals, H,K, C^{2} and a parameter of cyclical time motion.

Such as both are inverse, as systems decelerate when they become larger in Space. So frequency in waves, temperature in matter, density of mass in space fall with size.

In physics 5D metrics (Sp x Tiƒ = ∆) are expressed in the equations of ‘Energy’ which is the ‘aggregated’ sum of all formal motions, conserved for each scale:

E (∆-1) = h(p) x v (Tƒ)

E (∆) = nk (Sp) x Temperature (Tƒ)

E (∆+1) = c² (Sp) x m (Tƒ)

Thus v-frequency in the quantum scale, T-emperature in the thermodynamic scale and M-ass density in the gravitational scale are the *3 relative clocks of time* speed of the 3 fundamental scales of size of the Universe.

While H, K and C² are the 3 ‘bidimensional’ constants of spatial motion that define the ‘motion’ or ‘size’ of the minimal space action of each species in each scale.

And its combination give us the ‘conserved’ energy, that is the integral of all the formal motions or ‘lineal and angular, | and O-momentums’ of each scale.

*An important point: the second law of thermodynamics is statistical in nature. It has no meaning at the level of individual molecules, whereas the law becomes essentially exact for the description of large numbers of interacting molecules. In contrast, the first law of thermodynamics, which expresses conservation of energy, remains exactly true even at the molecular level.*

Beyond those 3 scales, we could also consider an equation for the ‘strong force’ and energies of the inner region of the atom, and one for the outer region and dark energy and dark matter of the outer region of the galaxy.

** **

**Creation by breaking of symmetries.**

In that regard, a key element to understand physical systems, as well as any system is the duality between static states of *symmetry between:*

- Space and time, S<≈>T, which in the mathematical mirror is reflected in the algebraic operations (<≈> being the symbol for them all) that group together space and time dimensions and show how they interact.
- Broken symmetries, when S and T split: S >≠< T, WHICH is a process that seems to create new forms, forces and particles…as an ∑∏, social group of space quanta and time frequencies, breaks into its components (a concept used by physicists to explain the birth of forces and particles that we shall extend to study many mathematical relationships between energy, active magnitudes and t-s parameters).
- And Space-time motions or STeps, S<T>S<T… S≈S≈S… T≈T≈T, MIRRORED in mathematics by analysis, which studies how the transformations between space and time MOVE the Universe, causing its more positive, dynamic, creative transformations – as symmetry splits often hide a mere entropic process of death… Those STeps are then…

**The first beats of existence.**

In the graph, below the 3 main type of timespace motions, past entropic expansion that lower a plane of space-time, the system to ∆-1; future, implosive in-form-ation that rises it, and present wave-flows broken further into 3 sub-motions that conform the super organisms of a present sheet of space.

Time space motions are depicted above using the 4D formalism of ‘light cones’ adapted to any space-time where the flows of time space can acquire 4 basic forms, st: <>; <<: tt vs. >>: ss (middle image, which orientated downwards would be the entropic form) and >< ts. We shall study them in the full formalism of existential algebra, sometime into the future, as they correspond to the basic, st, ss, tt, ts FLOWS OF TIME-SPACE which define formally the worldcycles of existence of all species. The Universe ultimately builds up with them through the holographic method, all kind of systems by combining st, tt, ts & ss holographic forms in growing states of complexity.

Physical systems, are in that sense specially interested as *models of the simplest steps of reality, specially given the fact that huminds deny them any ‘organic property’ under the ego paradox; so their description is relatively simple, in huge herds.*

And as it is, is useful for ∆st theory because it allow us to get to the very basic principles of space and time, its symmetries and steps.

In each of those ratios, or universal constants, basic ST formulae of physical systems, H, K, C etc. we can see the system as an ST system that can split into s and t. So we can consider how a present system can generate a ternary one and indeed it only requires a Universal ratio/constant to split between its S and t components. This is the breaking of a symmetry, the fundamental process of creation in physical systems, by which any of the ratios, density of information, t/s, speed, s/t or momentum-force, s x t split into its two components one with an entropic expansive spatial tendency and the other with a cyclical temporal formal one, becoming two different parts of the being:

In the graph, breaking of symmetries mean both an entropic big-bang death and a condensation, as the wave and particle, loose its connection and descend and ascend planes of existence. When a symmetry breaks thus two inverse forces are created. But the total virtual energy of the Universe will be always a zero sum – the value of the space-time plane which was ‘split’ to create more form tan pure flat space.

Thus special relativity which defines a metric tensor, (-, +++) becomes the flat space-time Universe made only with light information, when that flat space-time breaks, we shall see up and down wobbles in the fifth dimension and so on, which will give rise to emergent virtual vibrating particles, whose total zero sum however will make them virtual… The beta decay is the most obvious one as a neutron splits into a ± total neutral charge, one inward and one outwards tendency regions of spas-time.

In the graph, a neutron breaks its symmetry in electric forces. A particle-antiparticle is a symmetry broken out of the original light space-time, a black hole acts as a door to the outer faster than c denser that t=o regions:

In the graph the many ways in which a ‘duality’ or inversion of arrows of space, of time, of scales, define the main breaking got symmetries as we move through the 3 elements and its inversions, ∆º±1, s<st>t, |<ø>O…

Any of those ∆º, st, Ø can split up and down in inverse antysymmetric arrows, of max. t or max. s, max. | or Max. O, Max i or Mas. -i

So a part of mathematical physics adapted to ∆st needs to explain in terms of the more realist generator equations of each of those ternary elements, the different breakings of symmetries, understood as splits into a ‘temporal force’ (i.e. weak force) and spatial force (i.e electromagnetic force), or between an ∆-1 scale, the strong force and n ∆+1 scale, the gravitational force (here breaking the symmetry of the curvature-active magnitude at ∆º and viceversa).

Then, we can see in both ‘reversed local time frames’ those transformations.

A black hole event horizon or any membrane-closed cycle can be seen also in terms of predation as a breaking of symmetry, and so big-bangs can be interpreted as such when they leave a knot of denser matter (star transformations).

And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< c-speed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).

**Mathematical examples: open balls and Klein non-euclidean disks.**

IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD then also as an open ball vital space-time of energy breaking into two opposite past and future, ∆±i scales, lines and cycles that split and so we can find equations of the type U. C. = S ± T ˆ S / ð = S X T

In the graph, the pseudo sphere is used to represent Kerr black holes on its central, faster than light axis, which transforms ‘time cycles’ beyond c-speed into spatial dark energy shut through its tachyon jet-axis into the dark world outside galaxies. This spinning process of accelerating and expelling waves and fields of information and energy absorbed through the bidimensional plane-mouth, is natural to all fractal points of the Universe in any scale of reality.

The pseudo sphere however has 2 jets, one that emits the Sp field of the system its absorbs and kills and one that emits its Tƒ particles, the red and blue shift sides of the black hole or star jet.

Both are the sides of a ‘broken dead-symmetry’ when a physical species, Sp<ST≥Tƒ dies, as all systems, it does so because its ‘fields, waves and particles’ dissociate, loosing the synchronicity of its internal clocks (De Broglie’ s wave-particle analyzed that synchronicity in its masterpiece paper, today often forgotten on the forest of mathematical trees). All systems then break as the time vortex accelerates and the field lines decelerate in inverse versions. Thus all symmetry-split of a Universe constant of action or wave can be seen also as a death process of the physical system, and its now unconnected parts.

It is the duality of symbiotic creation big-bang destruction, clearly shown in the particle-antiparticle ± charge fields vs. the proton-electron, ± symbiotic union. The same graph can represent the potential inverse symmetry wells of those positive and negative charges:

Another way to represent those two sides of a symmetry is the concept of a potential well:

A **potential well** is the region surrounding a local minimum of potential energy. Energy captured in a potential well is unable to convert to another type of energy (kinetic energy in the case of a gravitational potential well) because it is captured in the local minimum of a potential well.

The potential well will then be the ‘symmetry point’ or ‘Universal constant’, the c-speed of zero mass-energy; the place in which pure motion and pure form will reside eternally; which once broken will distend into the negative and positive ‘death’ maximals and minimals, extremal points.

The potential well becomes then as the ‘death process’ splits its parameters into a potential barrier, which the system will NOT be able to cross unless it returns to its present-wave form (quantum barrier crossed in the wave state when the extremal past x future field-article system returns to the wave state):

**The time clocks of the ∆±1 scales. ****∆+1: gravitational masses vs. ∆-1: electromagnetic charges**

The main time symmetries in the 5^{th} dimension are between Tƒ- ∆-1 micro points, frequency charges, with clocks related to the H-planck constant and its frequency; ∆-thermodynamic clocks, based in temperature and ∆+1 gravitational masses, macro points of the cosmological scale.

Another way to express this duality is between the ‘positive gravitational force’ of negative potential energy and the ‘negative gravitational force’ or electric charge of the electronic world or positive entropy and expansive lineal motion tendencies.

So we can also talk of a symmetry breaking between: Tƒ-Gravitational forces vs. Sp Electromagnetic forces, of which we have shown of its many perspectives the unification of charges and masses from both points of view, and the big-bang scales. Let us now study this theme from the whole perspective of 5D physics and its ages of ‘symmetry breaking’.

What about time? How does modern physics understand the fractal, ternary nature of time arrows and its clocks within the galaxy?

For all what we have said…

Barely. As they have NOT even found the time clocks of each of those scales. Now an important element of those equations of Perturbation theory is the existence of a constant of present action in space-time which allows to transfer, energy and information across scales, which is the ultimate meaning of Planck Constant and Boltzmann constant in the particle and matter states, such as:

∆-1: E=H v, ∆: E= 3/2 K T.

It thus remains here for the intelligent reader to wonder which is the constant of the ∆+1 gravitational scale.

And How they are related between scales.

Hint: we write energy, as E=1/2 mv^{2}… + U (internal energy, which does have an important content of heat.)

We will return to that. What is the constant, mass or speed?

And then we can wonder about the coefficients. Why the quantum does not have one, or maybe is that we must use h-bar that has one? Does all this has to do with dimensions, and what is the relationship between dimensions in those scales? Are we growing in dimensions as we go up? Or is the opposite way?

And if it is up and a wave of light has 2 dimensions? And then a molecule 3 ‘degrees of freedom’, and then gravitation 4 Dimensions, who is the 1 dimensional being?

2 neutrinos give us ½+1/2=1 spin. Here we go, the theory of neutrino light of Pauli, Bohr, Born, Fermi today forgotten. Didn’t you notice the neutrino had in the ol’ good times negative mass-faster than light speed then, it has (found through its angle) the size of a string?

All those busy-busy theoreticians researching for strings. Ah but there is here a conundrum, which I regard as the most important pending question of 5d physics (never mind nobody else is researching:) – how to make a neutrino a graviton. Then all will be solved, the architecture starting by its basement, up to the roof.

Well I do have my solution but in the next post where we deal with the meaning of spin, which Physicists don’t know at all what it means. We do – simply statement: they are the eyes of the quantum world.

Ok, let us give you the bone.

About what is Mass:

∆-1: Frequency->∆:Temperature->∆+1: Mass

∆-1: H-> K-Boltzmann->∆+1: c-speed

But there is a much more important concept of time, in 5dimensional physics, related to the meaning of the Universal Constants of ‘Energy and Time’, of the 3 fundamental planes of the 5th dimension and its physical systems, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-Thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 cosmological scale, which will truly explain the equations and meanings of physics.

It is a simple relationship. There are 3 Constants of space-time in each scale:

∆-1: H-Planck constant: Energy = H x whereas H is the constant of action and ƒ the measure of frequency, the internal clock of time of quantum systems.

∆: k-Boltzmann Constant: Energy = 2/3k x T, whereas k is the constant of action of thermodynamic systems and T, temperature, the measure of molecular vibrations, the internal clock of molecular systems.

∆+1: c-Light Space Constant: E = cc x M, whereas c² is the constant of action of the Gravitational scale and M, Mass, the cyclical vortex of time, the clock of Gravitational systems.

How energy and time transfer between scales, how a clock of time disappears in one scale, so Standard Model particles do not have mass, and then its frequency clocks transfer time in the form of radiation to the thermodynamic scale, and then Black holes of the gravitational scale don’t have temperature… questions that physicists have not even answered because using lineal time, as Pauli once said of a paper, ‘they are no even wrong’… and will open up an entire new world of relationships and meanings to each and all sciences.

But let’s not be so harsh on them. Actually they have really solved it all for us theorists to put it straight.

Now all what is left is to connect the knots, literally.

How does a certain time flow emerges, into a new scale?

The answer are the 3 regions of space-time, which diverge.

In relativity mass is** defined** as the **invariant** length of the energy momentum 4 vector. There is **no difference** between rest mass and dynamical mass.

Mass or rather density is an inverse of temperature. Temperature feeds on radiation AND exhausts it. Mass feeds on temperature and exhausts it. The black hole grows in mass as it cools down: M = K/T till reaching temperature zero (exactly the inverse of what Mr. Hawking postulates, as we have explained ad nauseam). Frequency of light also goes down in ‘infrared’ hot waves as they die away into heat. So as time moves from one lower scale to a larger scale it transfers its formal motion to the upper scale of existence. But it means the death or ‘muttering’ of the lower scale. So when a molecular orbital appears, it mutes the lower orbitals, when a whole appears its parts become synchronised to the motion of the whole and its individual ‘times’ become secondary.

So temperature reaches a balance or isothermic equilibrium when mass takes over. This physicists who do not understand a dot of what they write in organic terms, seems a dead of the physical system.

It is not. It merely is upgraded to the mass scale, when temperature dies away to prevent internal disorder. The same happens when light dies away in the infrared hot scales. Particles and its inverse antiparticles, are dead states, when PRECISELY the mass factor appears in particles, ONLY when they die, conjugated into antiparticles.

**SPLITTING WAVES: THE BREAKING OF SYMMETRY**

__The creation process: breaking of symmetries.__

WHEN A SYSTEM is across any of its main topological, temporal and scalar symmetries, ‘compressed’ into a relative single present ratio/form, the being is in its lowest ‘energy’ state, and as such it has maximal information in minimal space, Max. i x Min. S and can be considered estable.

The breaking of symmetry thus *happens when a system that condensates its 3 elements of a ratio, s/t, t/s, s x t into a single being, breaks them ito 3, expanding, we might say from ∆+i whole state to a ternary desegregation. The form we study this fact, through universal constants, condensation of forces, decouplings, beta decays etc. among physicists should define the system itself.*

CREATION TAKES PLACE by the fusion of a past and future into a present, which can be seen inversely as the split of a present into a past and future:

PASST ENTROPY X FUTURE -INFORMATION < ≈ > PRESENT SPACE-TIME

the splitting of symmetry thus gives birth by expansion and reproduction to two more extended entropic and more informative, singular, • points.

I.e. a ‘female’ nucleon can be in the state of past-future (atom of hydrogen) or in the present state as nucleon.

An atom can be conceived as neutral neutrons which do not change state but remain in constant present and proton + electron, which can be in both states.

The male sterile neutron accumulates till warping in excess on the one hundred symmetry the atomic old form.

Now in the jargon of physics all happens when the symmetry of a balanced point of present, or wave equation that breaks its symmetry and the Sæ entropic field and the informative vortex depart, each other in a different direction. Thus an equation of dynamic constant between Sæ and To, in which instead of a permanent Sæ≤+> To, ternary field or organism in communication the it=…es break into a Darwinian event in which both systems transfer energy and information in different direction, or in a superposition event in which both add into a bosonic stronger wave, or an antisymmetric annihilator wave.

So how many different events can happen upon contact of two relative fractal points tis is the essence of Algebraic geometry, when considering that each point has contact upon 3 scales of reality and relative past and future symmetries in each scale, so the number of possible flows and combinations of reality increase immediately as a system enters in contact with one of its relative single dimensions of existence.

Let us be the neutron, the mass, the neutral form, and the turning momentum, let us be and split into a max. Sæ electron and a max. To, up quark, let us give each other ½ of our mass, let us make it ± 0, let us call the electron positive energy and the proton negative energy, let us say they will become each other and in doing so it will create the existence of the electromagnetic world. Let us give to this electromagnetic world a quantity of force of 1/3rd for each of the 3 axis of the electromagnetic wave, and 1.4t o its weight, let us do the inverse with the up quark let us give it a quantity of positive fractional charge, which is only a part of that of the electron, let us the electron rule existence in space, let us it collapse into mass in zero temperature, at cooper pairs, let us be and not be virtual and real zero negative and positive.

This division of the neutron however happened after a previous division between the c and the non c speed vortices of time, masses that across the strange halo quark event horizon at c speed rotational quark which split in faster than c dark energy and dark mass of top quark as and the below c speed o the up and down quarks and electrons, and so the down appeared from the strange quark and in doing so in falling into existence it split itself into an infinite quantity of beta decays, which created gravitational neutrino waves and electromagnetic background radiation and in this beta decay at 25i k the creation of the Universe progresses slowly but steadily into the expansion of a new space-time relative infinite dilation.

But the infinity of the exponential unreal function that disintegrates two conjugates into a zero present, and vice versa it spits and creates virtual universe of positive and negative null zero sum in space and time, this being and not being, this pure fractal up and down, formal motion, formal perception motion and pleasure, this vital substance which all its actions and reactions cosmic orgasms of motion reproduction wave perception tuning and synchronizing your clocks with the herd, in Maxwell’ screws reaching to higher informative collapses, and messengers of existential function in physiological networks, travels though the fifth dimensions…

**THE BREAKING OF SYMMETRY: UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS AS LIMITS OF THE EXISTENCE OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.**

Now, we have 3 different constants of space, time, ∆+1=c-speed, ∆-1=H-planckton and ∆-Bolt(zmann constants), which represent the 3 natural space-time coexisting systems of the human species.

The c-speed, of gravitational space-time, decouples instantly into time and space (whose product on natural Planck units give us c-speed). So the angular frequency of time and distance on space give us c-speed,and vice versa the creative process starts as we see space-light and time-light in different ways.

If we see space-light in a sense of seeing, speed, we then enter into a regime of entropy, spatial perceptions, of |-electromagnetic forces.

if we see space-light in the a sense of seeing information, h-plnack quanta, we see it in a regime of information. of quantum numbers.

in the middle though we see more complex wave-liquid functions in our sale of thermal waves of matter.

The breaking of symmetry of the thermodynamic scale turns around the triple point of each quantum world-species of atom, and all respond to an ideal, generic atomic thermodynamic chemical process:

In the graph, the thermodynamic world turns around each relative world of existence of an atomic species, described by its temperature in the lower scale and by the laws of heat and thermodynamics for huge lumps of matter, in the lower scale, the world of thermodynamics connects with the quantum world of radiation, and in the upper scale of solid states, with the world of density of space-time mass.

For each space-time system thus we can define the triple point as the O-point of the mind point of maximal activity and information, as it is a region in which information from 3 different forms of freedom the liquid, gas and solid state, and we contend also 2 regions of the 5th dimension the upper arrow of evolution and the lower arrow of entropy, forming in fact a 5Dimensional point with 5 degrees of freedom, which is what a mind Tiƒ really is:

- ‘A 5th dimensional point is a triple point with S-ST-T connected regions which is also a point of travel in the 2 dimensions of social evolution, +∆ and entropy – ∆.

UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS ARE VITAL CONSTANTS OF A LARGER SCALE OF EXISTENCE OF A PHYSICAL SYSTEM, WHILE ITS SCALAR CONSTANTS ARE THE ACTIVE MAGNITUDE, often the value of the specific Metric of the being, its most important value: ∆=Sp x T

Once this is understood and the space-time main events and systems of physics are described we can consider the next phase of T.Œ, which is specially relevant in a mathematical science as physics, hence we shall mention it so early in the introduction: the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:

- The Sp/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
- Its inverse, Tƒ/Sp information density.
- The Sp=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Sp x Tƒ).

They are the internal space-time parameters of the being.

Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ, Active Magnitude, ÅC, to the external world also made of 3 ∆+1 Sp- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:

ÅC/Sp World Field, which provides energy to the being.

ÅC/ST World Body-wave, which provides reproductive actions to the being.

ÅC/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.

Whereas ÅC is the parameter, which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Thus in physics the key to harmonize TŒ and classic studies and equations will be to to consider the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of its generator equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Sp: informative densities, Sp/Tƒ: energy densities and Sp=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Sp: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: Λ-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; Λ+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of theΛ-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and Λ+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metric= SexTi= K, which defines the Constants of action: Λ-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

Λ: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt’)= E x T, which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Sp/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’:

Λ-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Sp-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

Now the reader should observe nothing else is needed really to describe physical systems isomorphic to all other descriptions of reality, as this still taken from Britannica’s article on Universal constants show:

Those are the fundamental constants because they define the 3 ‘stationary points’ of the world cycle of all physical systems, which the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equations translate mathematically (Britannica ads the Faraday constant related to charge, I presume because of nationalist memes 🙂

Now what is really the world we live in? The answer is that we are sandwiched between the cosmological dark world and the invisible world below light, the space-time we ‘see’. Thus of all those constants really the ones that matter are:

** The splitting of symmetries and universal constants in physics. ****The conservation of ST-presents.**

The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into ST-waves-bodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.

Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: *‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.*

This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative space-frm and time-motion, or O-x |=Ø, that is an event which is creative.

The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = Ø-Present, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆-Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:

Sp = ∞ x O = Time point -> Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.

Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.

The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.

Which has by definition, *one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.*

So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.

What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrino-giravtational connections.

So we are gravitational beings.

We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, c-speed or 0 temperature or H-planck.

The Universe is immortal in 0-sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinite-simal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.

The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.

Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Sp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.

*Coincidentia Oppositorum, said* Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Sp, Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, standing points and constants are in our world:

__Sp=Tƒ: constants of present action on 3 scales.__

– C: the space-time fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.

__Max. Sp & Max. Tƒ: Young-energetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.__

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.

– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0-Kelvin temperature.

It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and anti-worlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and Anti-Universes.

In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Sp, Tƒ, Sp=Tƒ, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Sp=Tƒ original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with c-speed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.

We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light space-time galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.

In such Universe we do know there is a space-time, which is light space-time. So we can consider it spit above or below a certain dividing constant Sp x Tƒ, speed, ‘c’.

We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a c-speed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know

outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of c-speed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand *because* seeing as distance, faster than c-speed appears as expansive, entropic space.

This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more to-order into the side of more se-entropy, in the action of death.

Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum?

As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond c-speed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the anti-atom galaxy.

So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.

Next there is the question moves to the ∆-thermodynamic scale.

Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.

And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.

Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at c-speed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0-barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.

In the graph, the quantum barrier can only be crossed in wave state. The understanding on T.Œ of those phenomena requires to fully grasp the ‘changes in time speed’ which all systems can perform within the limits of its constants of action: as we can accelerate our actions, increasing the tempo of our heart clock, which in turns do change our perception of time, systems can change its E x T = H quantum of action accelerating its time clocks or decelerating them, and can change its ‘states’ from body-actions (wave-state) to head-actions (particle state).

After crossing as wave in the lower ∆-1 plane of the 5^{th} dimension, the system though shows a lower energy-frequency, which it has spent going ‘under’ the well, in the ∆-1 dimension not above, jumping over the Height dimension of growth of form (which we observe in boson states of eusocial evolution that pile up frequencies of bidimensional spin 1).

Those are essential beats of absolute freedom and zero-viscosity, which all systems of the Universe can perform, in its vital state. The risks of those changes of state happen when the ‘change’ moves towards the ‘LNK’ limits of the physical function (Max. Sp=c-speed > stable>Max. Tƒ-form= 0 k), where the split an cause the death of the system.

We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5^{th} dimension, ∆-particle < ∆-1: wave, faster state: motion > Particle-still form.

**Scalar symmetry in 5 D. Asymmetry in in a single plane of Space and Time anti-symmetries.**

Now, while in other sciences where space is not so important, form acquires very different shapes, in physics, forms are simple, closer to the ideal cycles, lines, toroid, spheres, ellipses and waves of the perfect mathematical game.

So the concepts of group transformation, isomorphism, isotropism, translation, mirror symmetry, asymmetry, parity, chirality and antisymmetry, which refers to the changes in external form of a given species when travelling through space (left, right up and down in a single 5D plane), Time (through 3 ages in a single 5D plane) or travelling through 5D (that is evolving socially or devolving through multiple planes, by changing your internal S, T parameters) are all defining the nature of the events we study and the relationships between species.

All this of course, physicists know but as they do not ‘have a general’, simple understanding of it in terms of 5D fractal space-time, it is merely explain with confusing jargons and experimental ‘ad hoc’ rules, coming out of experience but also out of the blues, with no underlying reason.

We shall thus consider as a final theme for this introduction to the generator, what kind of changes happen in the form and symmetries of a system when it travels in an of those 3 different ‘mediums.’

In that regard, it would be really helpful for physicists truly interested in ‘meaning’ to accept the 5Dimensional structure of the Universe and start comparing and modeling the different sections of their science according to the ¬Æ similarity between symmetric scales, bearing in mind that the maximal analogy (but never equality or identity, which as mathematical formalisms show is a barren concept) between:

– Scalar similarity and symmetry of phenomena (maximal equality) between every 2 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, NOT between the lower ∑|-1 and Oo scales, in the way we perceive it, as the lower scale is considered the energy of the upper scale that becomes information. We shall see this constantly as lineal atoms become cyclical forms in the social grouping, as proteins which are lineal become cyclical rings in the next scale, as cyclical nucleotides become lineal spiral DNA molecules and so on.

Thus the symmetry of scalar planes happens between 2 different levels, but the continuous levels are inverse anti- symmetric in the way temporal inversions are.

For example in cosmology on the larger scale we unified charges and masses but found that the galaxies are likely to be antiparticles on the way they have their mass distributed.

While other possible alternatives according to the ternary symmetries or arrows of an event might be used to explain them (i.e. a new scale of a cosmic big-bang given the 10^{11} constant between X and X+1 planes found in the number of galaxies; or inversely a description of the internal galaxy with the strong force, which gives to quarks a 1% of mass and does not diminish with distance resolving the dark matter problem); the theory that better corresponds to the observed data and general laws of T.Œ is to consider an inversion of scales, from particles (our scale) to antiparticles (the galactic scale)

Since the black hole nucleon has only one thousandth the mass of the halo, hence it is an inverted electro∆+ proton system.

The Black Hole 0.1% mass resembles the mass of the center of an anti-atom (with an electron in the center, 1800 relationship of mass to the proton).

And so we could consider that in the next scale of the Universe with other physical parameters self-similar to ours but inverted (as it is always the case when we transcend scales, which become in this manner antisymmetric; so the symmetry of scales happens every i±2, which explains the quantum jumps of death), the Universe is a world of antiparticles.

Indeed, when we die we break two scales down, from humans to macromolecules, amino acids, which as we shall see resemble our form, with its nitrogen heads, its OH- legs and its carbohydrate bodies, NOT to the cell level which die too very fast in a quantum jump. So the comparison in biology is between macromolecules and humans, where the cell becomes the ‘house’ of the mental DNA strains whose activity and perception must be akin to the one we do have in a society and then again the comparison is between a cell and a nation, which has the similar form.

This is an essential element to fully grasp the similarities between scales that jump always both in time and space a generation – so we are similar to our grandparents more than to our parents, as kin observers of human nature have often considered. And life, yes, surprise, surprise, is jumping from the insects through the larger scale of humans into robotic insects in swarms of metalife…

Thus we must consider the inverted differences between motions in time, space and 5D as follows:

– __Temporal inversion__ is maximal between youth and old age and its forms and beyond (conception and death): absolute __antisymmetry__, of the ‘boundaries of the worldcycle’, which cancel each other on those ‘temporal limits’.

– A lesser antisymmetry, which we shall call ‘asymmetry’, happens between the __simultaneous co-existence of those 3 ages as forms of space,__ which is ‘merged’ in the central ‘present form’ of the system.

The difference in that sense between 5D and space-time in a single membrane is obvious. 5D scales are far more similar part by part, and can be considered ‘mimetic’ brothers of each other, as the charge and mass unification equation shows (identical in the non-detailed simplex first age of the subject, obviously more different as we advance into more detailed relativity equations).

On the other hand, temporal systems, when we include the conception, informative age and the entropic death, with its quantum jumps that ‘go through the balanced present’ in an instant of time are the example of pure anti-symmetry, in the sense of ‘inversion’ of all the parameters.

Death is Max. Se x Min Tƒ. Conception is Max. Tƒ x Min. Se.

A moment of death is a big-bang explosion in a quanta of time with maximal expansion in space. A moment of conception is the collapse of information into a point of minimal space; a seminal seed of the lower scale; and the life process is the process of motion from Max. Tƒ x Min. Se into Max. Se x Min. Tƒ.

In physics the fundamental equation to define that inversion is E(Se) (kinetic energy) < ST- c2 (wave state) > Tƒ (informative state): E=Mc2.

While in space the complementarity between those two extremes manifests in the non-existence of a death-conception state of the being, but on the constant flux of the entropy field absorbed by the energy-limbs and the particle that gauges information. So we could consider the equation of space-present to be Past x Future = Present-wave, which is the element that matters more.

This brings also a duality in systems in space: Present waves, which we will term ‘female gender, Ø’, for reasons that should be obvious to the person that has read more of this blog (it is the same configuration that in sexual gender in the biological systems) as opposed to past (motion) x Future (particle) = Present system, with momentum, p or angular momentum rp.

Thus space has two sub-configurations, and one of the commonest relationships is that which equals the value in terms of energy-information of the wave state and that of the particle in terms of momentum, embodied in the Past x Future = Present equality, which in our scales would mean the same value for a woman and a man, a female and a male, a reproductive function and an energy-information dilated functions.

Now all this has a wide application when we classify and calculate and explain physical formulae and differentiate phenomena which can be considered perceived in space as those which can be considered transformations in time? Why. Obviously because in time, what we shall observe is a different type of equations:

E(se) ≥ ST as a field becomes a wave, and looses ‘entropy’, that is energy which does not transcend in the evolution, and then ST≥ Tƒ, as the wave becomes the particle which collapses but in this case however as the wave and particle are complementary and closer in evolution, often with internal clocks in synchronicity, (as in De Broglie quantum matter wave-particles dualities) entropy somehow is lesser than in the first transformation between a relative infinite field of energy with a boundary limit that collapses into the wave state.

So we obtain seemingly different mathematical results when we study a time antisymmetry from a space symmetry, when we deal with momentums and when we deal with energy transformations. Still those equations will hold for many elements despite being contradictory in principle, because one is a static and the other a dynamic process. Moreover because we do NOT see with enough speed the cycles of particles in the lower max. Tƒ x Min. Se = K scales of the fifth dimension we will often as physicists do confuse a time event with a spatial form, and so a way to differentiate relationships and events is by considering the quantitative data we obtain in those equations:

Past-field x Future-particle = Present wave: constant of action; hence Past = Present/Future: Field = Wave/particle (density of energy) or the inverse of a field potential = particle/wave (density of information)

Past ≥ Present wave; Present wave ≥ Future particle. Future Particle ≤Past field (in the moment of death).

Thus in time we obtain 3 slightly similar equalities while in space we obtain a constant of action: Energy x Time = constant of action (h-Planck unit of present in quantum physics or k-Boltzmann constant, unit of present I thermodynamics).

Now this might sound esoteric, metaphysical or confusing to the reader but it is the key to find meaning to processes in physics and interpret most of the fundamental equations defined precisely by a few ratios in products and simple division equations. Indeed the intelligent reader will observe that merely playing with the equation of space symmetries we obtain 3 parameters which define most equations of physics, density of energy, density of information and constant of action, and the related concepts of speed of a particle, momentum, and finally the value of energy of the past-field, which can also be seen as a distance-speed.

Finally we will find the seemingly undistinguishable social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, but simple laws will rule those also. The first of which is the superposition rule which allow to sum identical particles into larger social scales along a most likely scalar (particle) or vectorial (field) or a combination of both (wave) parameter. Thus when we find species, which only different in the amount value of its active magnitude, mass in particle families, we will observe elements of the 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension. But why they don’t vary along the whole range of the 3 dimensions?

The answer happens because there are two way of defining those 5^{th} dimension: the steady state region of small social scales or herds, and the Lorentzian past and future relative religions, which are ‘Dedekind cuts’ of single points, as particles are states which co-exist in both, the lower and upper scale as your ego co-exists in the upper social world and the lower world. Thus another way to define the relationship between the 3 parameters is this waves exist in the superposition region of relative present scales of a single plane of the fifth dimension, with addition of frequencies and energies, and particles are the sinking transcendental points or vortices between both.

This is explained therefore with the concept of Newtonian and Lorentzian regions, which is fundamental to all the work of 5D metrics.

In the graph we can observe the 3 regions-states of space-time symmetries in physical systems, above in time evolution as fields converge creating bidimensional waves or 3 dimensional particles and explode into entropy in the moment of death.

Particles exist in the ‘Cut’ between present and future, and are the state in which the system ‘emerges’ as energy of the higher scale of the 5^{th} dimension, enacting its motions to the service of the larger whole.
So as humans move in external cycles to enact the actions of larger beings for which they toil, photons collapse into electronic nebulae as particle-points that will serve the larger cycle.

The complexity of physics in that sense is PURELY ORGANIC IN MEANING. And this fact is what mathematical physics with its abstract jargon completely hides. The process has become even more entrenched with the adoption of increasingly abstract concepts of the axiomatic age of formal mathematics and the obsession for detail, which given all the complex elements that interact to define with complete precision the motions and forms of those physical events, make rather difficult to understand the underlying organic principle. And yet those are the rulers of the physical processes as everything else in the Universe. Indeed, the mechanical view does NOT hold at all in any process, which is NOT absolute and material as physicists earlier pretend (now they just don’t pretend anything, but describe). Consider for example the phenomena of wave-particle complementarity:

Only as particles matter systems feel the strong attraction or repulsion forces, since they are either gauging – absorbing information – or emitting it as entropy, in their past x future Se x Tƒ states. In this configuration they are NOT commutative as the Matrix analysis of quantum physics (Heisenberg) proved, to his chagrin.

He never understood why unlike other matrix this past x future ≠ future x past. Simple, Se>Tƒ means in broad terms that the field of energy is used as information (evolves to future state) by the particle that absorbs it: ∆e->∆o. The result as when we communicate with other human particle information hat we understand tends to be in the physical realm an approach of both. On the other hand, a Tƒ <Se state, is the inverse action, future x past, Tƒ < Se, whereas the particle emits in-Form-ation (Potential energy) resulting in a repulsive action (or interacts with the underlying field expanding it, if we want to adopt a 5D ±X perception of the process, which is the 3^{rd} version of quantum ‘field physics’).

So they are NOT commutative actions. It is NOT the same to travel back to entropy that travel forwards to information.

This concept is essential to understand why weak forces, which are time transformations, do NOT conserve parity.

On the other hand, mere interactions of the type Tƒ1 (Fermion) >< ST (boson wave) ><Tƒ2 Fermion conserve parity and are equal when we see it from the Tƒ1 or Tƒ2 perspective. Here the two particles are collaborating either informing each other or using the boson wave to foster their motion as the wave, implodes or expands the lower field.

In that regard, departing from a mechanical, first simplistic view of the interaction of physical organisms of the quantum scale, physicists have kept growing their data an ‘exceptionalist’ events, which completely destroyed the simplistic view they still teach in schools of particles as ‘balls’ that collide ‘mechanically’ conserving their momentums and that ‘bag for al phenomena’ called Energy, while there are still disquisitions among philosophers on the wave-particle duality, (the field, ternary element being excluded normally except among Feynmannites). All this is not needed.

The physical organism displays the same complex behaviors than any other organism of any other scale. It is the human limited observance of them, its massive quantity of information only susceptible to social numbers’ treatment as indistinguishable and the praxis of sing them to construct and operate machines with precision measures, what has crafted our philosophy of them.

So let us consider for example the organic paradigm on the phenomena first brought about: superconductivity.

In essence it means that when the system is NOT disturbed by the X+1 ‘whole’ molecular scale with its bothersome temperature-friction that takes energy out of the system, provoking its slavery and malfunctioning the system at the electric, particle social scale works much better and the electron which is supposed to be repulsive adopts a present-wave configuration in which the aforementioned mechanism of particle-field attraction/repulsion duality is no longer important, as wave are ‘reproductive’ motions over the field, which they configure reproducing the wave form and upgrading it in a much more harmonic manner.

A WAVE IS A PRESENT, REPRODUCTIVE STATE, as a woman is the wave present configuration in which Se>ST<Tƒ converge together giving energy and information to the present state, and so the wave displaces much faster in tune with the lower scale. And it does not suffer so much repulsion but superposition (in as much as the lower X-1 plane can be perfectly accommodate with its much faster time clocks, many multiple waves of the larger, slower scale given its Lk=Se x Tƒ co-invariance). But the electron wave also enters in harmony with the lattice of atoms and synchronize its vibrational clocks as cells do with larger wholes.

Thus ** t**o get some idea of how the effective interaction between two electrons in a metal can be attractive rather than repulsive, we need to consider a much more subtle effect that depends on the electron’s quantum wave properties. Consider an electron moving through a crystal lattice. Although it is much lighter than the atoms it passes, it still has a small effect on them and

they tend to vibrate a little in sympathy with the electron wave.

This does little in itself, but if there are two electrons it is possible for the atomic vibrations set up by one of them to affect the other and vice versa. Detailed quantum calculations show that the effect of this exchange of lattice vibrations between the electron waves is to reduce the total energy very slightly below what it would have been if the waves had not been present and that this attractive potential is largely independent of the electron separation. Provided the electrons are far enough apart to spread the wave and not collapse into particle, they will screen repulsion as waves and with the atoms. So, the overall result can be an attraction.

The attractive potential is extremely weak and so thermal energies even at low temperatures will break superconductivity. However, the interaction is essentially a quantum one that is best described as being between the electron waves. As these waves are spread throughout the whole crystal, the interaction is essentially independent of the electrons’ position, as its particle state no longer matters.

When we put all this together and apply quantum physics we find that the attraction is effectively concentrated on pairs and the electrons are ‘coupled’ or in terms of its organic state, they are superimposed present ‘married waves’.

In that regard, the astounding complexity found in the behavior of quantum particles at this stage of detail, which could fill itself an entire encyclopedia makes 0-sense with mechanical models that do not understand the organic paradigm.

œ-point particle states do gauge information, ∆ï, and do feed on energy, ∆e, present waves do reproduce and socialize into larger superposition waves, ‘collapsing’ into ∆+1 planes and fields, waves and particles are all together organic ∆±1 co-existing systems. And for that reason there are 3 ‘descriptions’ of quantum physics, which can be expressed with the Generator of its ‘linguistic, mental discipline’:

∆±1: Field>Boson>Particle (quantum fields) +Space description (time invariant): Schrodinger wave + Se≤≥Tƒ Time antisymmetry (Heisenberg non-commutative matrix description).

Thus each of those scales can be subdivided further according to the ternary principle into §ocial §cales and transition ‘borders’, where the evolution of the system accelerates in time or grows in *space at a different rhythm to enter into the new scale of the fifth dimension:*

In the graph, when we *change from ∆-scales, there is a gap in which the lineal metric of each scale of the 5th dimension, or proportion of S x T = K, changes. Why? Obviously because we ‘ad’ a layer of complexity going upwards that absorbs more ‘energy’ to structure itself; so larger wholes need more ‘total’ energy to build its ‘russian doll onion layers’ and so as we see clearly in the transitions of a regime of motion, when singularity vortices, tiƒ are created or in the Lorentzian limit when masses of higher density (strangelet quarks, top quark families) are created, while the v-speed-entropy, Spe parameter states constant, there is a growth of Tiƒ (vortex, mass), which means the system grows its total S x T energy, till reaching the new regime. And inversely in the ‘violet’ catastrophe of quantum physics energy radiation drops as the entropy-temperature level increases significantly less than the initial values expected.*

negative temperatures you call it mass. As the transition between scales transforms one parameter of frequency into the other:

In the graph the relativistic theories of heat and frequency and mass, in Planck’s work, Ali’s work and Einstein’s work, describe in a unified way, the limits of ‘informative reproduction’ of a wave of photons, phonons and nucleons, on the verge of its ‘discontinuous ∆º±1 quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational planes.

Phonons there are ‘virtual’ particles created and destroyed out of the extensive spatial field, carrying entropy-motion in the form of energy (condensed particle).

So for each scale of the Universe we must define three different regions: the entropic lower region, central balanced region, and upper informative one, in which we observe an emerging process of parts organized into wholes, and the birth of an eddy or vortex which slow down the speed of the system, as the external kinetic energy is converted into internal energy, till a third age vortex (relative time arrow) or a whole (absolute arrow) emerges perfectly organized in its internal structure, happens in all systems of the Universe.

All this said the parameters we humans use to define the ‘Spatial Extension’, ‘temporal information’, and ‘constant combinations of both, which become the finitesimal actions of its species’ in each scale are NOT clearly equivalent. And this is due in part to the transformations suffered between scales, and the limits of human perception of them.

But we DO have the fascinating fact that the overall formal motions of a given plane considered as Energy do transfer and conserves those parameters in all the processes between 3 scales.

So we can compare equations and terms between 3 such scales, with surprisingly symmetric results.

Such as in each lower, ∆-1, plane of the 5^{th} dimension, we will have a relative ‘infinitesimal’ point- system in 4 dimensions of space-time (2 corresponding to the Sp, entropy function and 2 dimensions to the Tƒ, informative function, as in this screen you use to receive information). Yet each of those 4D points, when they move upwards to the next scale, BECOME enclosed as a infinitesimal point of the larger ∆- scale of measure.

For example, between the temperature and mass scale the Stefan law is the statement that the total radiant heat energy emitted from a surface is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature: E = σT^{4}.

That is, Temperature, the clock of measure of the larger, ∆-thermodynamic scale encompass 4 dimensions (4 powers) of the clock of measure of the ∆-1 quantum scale, radiation, frequency. And so when the mass-body with Tƒ (∆)= T, emits radiation, Tƒ (∆-1) it does so in 4 dimensions, ƒ x ƒ x ƒ x ƒ.

So if E is the radiant heat energy emitted from a unit area in one second and T is the absolute temperature (in degrees Kelvin), then E = σT^{4}, the Greek letter sigma (σ) representing the constant of proportionality, called the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, related to the Boltzmann one.

Thus Energy is a composite concept, for a flow of formal motions divided into a constant of action, H, k, C² and a variable time clock that accelerates as frequency in quantum waves, temperature in thermodynamic systems and Mass density in accelerated vortices.

If as it seems the scales of the 5th dimension have no limit, given its symmetries between scales, which happen between the ‘galaxy atom’ and the ‘atom galaxy’ (see previous post on astrophysics and the Unification equation of charges and masses), it follows that the internal structure of the atomic nuclei will be similar to the internal structure of the galaxy. Thus, the strong force is attractive as gravitation; its force carriers gluons do carry also the strong force, as it happens in gravitation (gravity ‘gravitates’, is said) and in 5 D metrics protons and black holes have the same event horizon equation. By the same symmetry, it follows that dark energy should be similar to electromagnetic repulsive waves between atomic orbitals and explain the repulsive nature of intergalactic space. Those are thus the limiting scales in which evidence will be scanty, and where the symmetries of 5D scales can help to understand better.

But it is obvious that such sub-particle nuclear physics, the study of the smallest scales of the 5th dimension (∆-3,4), and the other ‘extreme’ physics supposedly explored at CERN – cosmology, ∆+3,4 through the replication of quark big bangs – are a restricted, relatively unimportant science, from the human perspective of our ∆o Plane of existence.

Since due to the multi-layered structure of the planes of the 5th dimension (the relative scales of size and time speed of the Universe), energy and information does not fully transfers between those planes – so the particle scale, as the scale of dark energy and dark information beyond the galaxy, do not affect us.

We humans are basically electronic, molecular systems, and so all what is below the atom and above the galaxy does not influence our existence – NOR it will reveal fundamental new truths about the Universe, as all PLANES follow the same metrics and laws of entropy and information, symmetries and structural forms.

The particle and dark world are beyond our ternary structure as organisms and species.

They can only affect us in entropic processes, beyond our 0 K and c-speed limits, which ‘kill our matter’ (nuclear bombs, self feeding dark matter that can convert our matter into strangelet or black holes). So besides death, there is little relevant knowledge to be acquired on those scales, for a simple reason: all scales of the 5th dimension follow the same mathematical ¬Æ laws of fractal points, ternary systems and its symmetries. And so we can learn more observing the scales closer to us, also in physical systems (atomic, molecular and matter scales, with its quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational laws.)

Thus physics is important on those 3 scales closer to human beings, and the knowledge we have acquired of those symmetries from quantum to gravitational scales, from atoms to star systems is essential to our life and well-being. Still there is much to improve and understand on those scales, when we ad new organic perspectives and the proper mathematical understanding of ‘fractal point-particles’ to the present analysis.

So we have for ALL the main planes, the previous equations, broken into two ternary symmetries around the charge ‘worlds’ and ‘mass’ worlds between which the human observer is sandwiched.

So the reader starts to see how we do fit and order, departing from the ternary structure of reality in space-time (equivalent to the ternary ‘Cartesian’ res-extensa+vortex+mind structure) and in scales (equivalent to Leibniz’s triad elements of reality : the tiƒ-monad, ST: ∑ 1/n finitesimals parts & ∫∫dtsdt integral/derivatives into wholes… to quote two founding fathers of ‘serious’ philosophy of science that mirrored it).

Needless to say if we were an atom we would see other parameters from other ‘monad’s mind perspective’ (ab. Pov).

This said what the equations of energy in those three scales mean is now more clear. As usual they will represent a function of present energy in each of those scales with:

-maximal detail (∆º thermodynamic scale) or

-limiting detail (c-limit of speed perception of information in ∆+1), or

– uncertainty, given the fact that we must ‘absorb’ some h-quanta (Heisenberg uncertainty) of angular momentum≈present information to ‘learn’ about the quantum observable (as e/10 is the toll we rest from 3 to emerge as an 11 tiƒ point in ∆+1 wholeness).

So as we have understood energy, common to the three, and the scalar, as in a puzzle we just explain the ‘third element’, the ratio constants, h, k and v or c (limit), with slightly different meaning to match the symmetry with the T, ƒ, m elements just described.

In the larger scale of gravitation, as Mass is the ‘scalar’ tiƒ element (vortex of quarks, centre of gravity, black hole of stars) and we are in the middle of the system, as the ‘momenta-energy’ element it follows that v is the field-potential-related Spe-motion; and the second version, e=mcc must be read as ‘entropy-disorder’ expansion and destruction of mass into entropy, in its *maximal possible motion; that of the structure ∆-i final scales of galactic substrata, light space-time.*

In the lower scale, however we are talking of a complete ‘reversal’ of perspective at all levels, from topology – elliptic in gravitation and relativity, hyperbolic or lineal in quantum – to function/form (essential concept in GST, paradoxical always, coexisting in multiple elements, with an ∆º perspective that changes the parameters we measure; and certainly with a much more complex logic than the human obsession for absolute one-dimensional truths/perspectives).

So H is a constant of the external membrane (still view) angular momentum (dynamic view) of the particle/wave we observe. It is not the unobservable tiƒ centre; and the interest of it, is its multifunctional roles, a theme studied in our posts on quantum.

Now it is important also to bear in mind constantly the fact, so little understood even if it is accepted since Einstein and Planck, that *the Universe is more about motion=events in time, not form in space.*

So we are talking of actions, of ‘present momentum’, of world cycles, and merely state that H is the ‘minimal world cycle’ of ‘energy’ of the quantum scale.

As energy and entropy are so often confused in physics, *we often follow along, not to correct constantly,* since they are relatively similar (energy is conserved, entropy tends to disorder; energy though has specially in kinetic energy the most used concept a tendency towards entropy more than towards form, which would be better represented as in-form-ation, a present-future state vs. energy a present-past, forming both the dual components of the wave, so for example the magnetic and electric field can be treated as the relative energy vs. information duality married through the wave speed, and its µ, k, constants: c²=k(t-curvature)/µ(s-gravito magnetic constant).

In the graph we see 3 physical parameters of those 3 arrows: entropy, as the minimal space-quanta of thermal scales, light speed, as the iterative present arrow of quantum space, and angular momentum, as the O-arrow of the same scale, which transcends into the gravitational concept, for gravitational orbits. What matters thus to localise a parameter of entropy/present space time/ or cyclical motions, is its topology that transcends scales.

*Why then energy=present can be equalled in the 3 scales of the organic Universe? This is the strongest prove that the Universe is connected through the metric of the 5th dimension; as it shows the 3 ∆±1 scales equal in value of ‘energy’ and co-existing with different Tiƒ parameters (T, M, V) and 3 different Space quanta (k, h, c). So ENERGY is ultimately the ∆-constant of the immortal Universe… self-contained in 3 parallel ‘scales’ of the 5th dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales.*

In other words, as those equations can be equalled, we could talk of a self-contained galaxy, our island-Universe (regardless of leaks both sides on the outside border with the world of dark energy, through neutrino waves), with 3 ‘scales’ of equal energy-∆ value, if we could calculate it (we can’t regardless of physicists hyperbolic statements on their tools of measure and number-crunching equations). On theoretical grounds any Supœrganism should have in symbiosis a series of balances, such as…

∆-1=∆=∆+1=3E; meaning the absolute value of entropy x time in the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales must be the same; for them to be in constant symbiosis in all its fractal parts.

How many elements humans use to describe each of those parameters vary in models of human knowledge. As humans reduce cyclical time to single parameters, normally the time function has less dimensions than the others: The main rule to remember is that the simplest lineal functions represented in a cartesian coordinates are functions of time-frequency on a number line, as we can describe a motion with a single parameter of speed, acceleration or deceleration (the 3 arrows of time in its simplex expression).

In each of those scales and sub-scales the enquire thus starts, with the search for the ‘3 elements’ of the generator both of the external ‘larger plane’-world in which we exist (quantum, ∆-1, thermal, ∆, or gravitational ∆1) and the internal world, often made from the same initial quanta of the larger world. This of course, happens also in biological systems, where we should start understanding the medium, water, from where its minimal quantum are extracted (we are evolved beings) and the energy of ¥-rays, which kicks out its motions, as most physical entities start with the atomic and ¥-ray quanta also.

**TRANSITIONS between scales**

NOW THE KEY CONCEPT to understand those scales is the first principles of GST, the nature of the three symmetries of physical systems, of its scales, of its quanta of space populations, of its inner and outer networks (extrinsic and intrinsic curvatures you might say) etc. etc. So a full translation of terminology is need, and a special understanding on how a physical system *travels through topological motions, temporal motions and ∆-scalar motions, that is a whole catalog of isomorphic laws, type of motions, varieties of species, which implies to unify an astounding array of terminologies, straighten up with proper non-e, non-a maths, the meaning of its equations, etc. *

I did start to do so very professionally in my youth translating Landau’s excellent 11 books encyclopaedia on physics, taken advantage of the clarity of the dualist soviet school but the job is unfinished and left for future researchers, as this blog is obviously just a ‘seed’ in a mind-point of a future branching GST analysis of reality by generations of human or A.I.

Transition between scales matter specially to fully grasp the terms involved:

In the graphS the most well known transition between the human light space-time galactic scale and the outer, dark energy/matter world beyond c-speed and below OK.

BUT THIS transition to the cosmological scale is far less important for humans than those in our ∆º thermodynamic scale (center) between states of energy, gaseous entropy, liquid and informative solid) and those in the quantum electromagnetic scale and beyond (inner region of atoms). How in each scale as in all other forms a lineal enteric system becomes curved angular momentum is then the higher truth of those transitions. The easiest homolog to observe is the central ∆º one transition from a bidimensional laminar flow of entropy, whose speed grows lineally with energy till it starts the vortex creation of time-clocks, which diminish its speed as more information is created:

V=S/T-> ∇v=∆ (S/T+Tƒi -vortex creation).

So as new information must be created in the motion of the fluid – that of the vortex particle, energy no longer becomes v-speed.

The same happens in the limit of c-speed which must be considered the homolog vortex creation – in this case of a mass vortex.

On the other side of processes, a density of enough information, T/S of a system, (i.e. a gravitational black hole) will be able to transform an S/t wave of ¥-energy into a cyclical form of mass, absorbed by the black hole.

And we can compare those effects again with the quantum photoelectric effect, in which the energy of the photon is purely absorbed by a static electron to a threshold. So those barriers of potential energy to activate an event of a higher or lower scale are never an absolute limit.

So what happens in those transitions is always what physicists call the energy of activation of a change of state, and the c-limit of speed of our light space-time should not be different from those transitions between Spe entropy (gas-field) st (liquid-boson wave-electron) Tƒi (solid-fermion-quark); which is the equation of a world cycle of three states of matter, that must be *completed on the bottom and upper part by the ‘transition’ to a lower scale or upper scale (or death).*

In that sense we can in the past of gaseous states of growing temperature, the plasma state, and on crystal of zero temperature, the pass to a boson state; which must be regarded as the emergence from plasma ∆-1 to gas, ∆º to boson condensate ∆+1.

In the graph the depiction of a relative plane of existence with the parameters of energy and information. In the center we find the superposition region of waves in the extremes the field and the particle, the particle and field will be in a ‘Dedekind cut’ (mathematical argon) or ‘Rosen bridge’ (relativity jargon) or ‘network collapse’ (5D jargon).

So only with present analysis of systems, we will be able to make sense of more equations.

Thus when talking of space, time and 5D symmetries strictly speaking we should talk in the generalized language of 5D T.Œ of:

Time antisymmetry; that is, the inverse parameters of birth and young ages vs. old ages and death, such as the Max. Space x Min. Time (death arrow) and Max. Time x Min. Space (life arrow). The antisymmetry of time cycles extended to conception and death is double: on one side the form changes, on the other the planes of existence change ad maximal.

Space asymmetry, that is equal in left or right motions (parity vs. chirality, being its physical measure)

- 5D plane symmetry; which however happens every 2 scales, such as o
_{-1}<|>O+1. So the symmetry of 5D jumps a scale, a fact of enormous importance in the description of beings, as particles become waves of the larger scale, which become particles, which become waves of the larger scale. So photons become parts of electronic waves, which collapse into photons that become parts of electric waves. And so on.

Further on, since there is a different proportion of information going downwards with entropy than upwards with no entropy (hence lower n-1 scales code with quantum numbers, genes or memes upper scales), and different proportion of motion going downwards with no entropy and upwards with entropy (so wholes can perfectly synchronize the motion of its parts); due to 5D metrics, Se x Tƒ = K. Entropy both of energy and information (Shannon) being its physical measure.

Now in physics the language of form does not care so much as form but to define in the abstract modern language, infected by the 3^{rd} age of ‘formal mathematics’ with the jargon and obsession for a ‘perfect photograph’ of distances and motions of the particles involved, and so they terms used chirality, parity, group, invariance, etc. are not functional for T.Œ (as they would make no sense in other sciences. So we shall try to translate those terms for what they matter: how they affect to the spatial, temporal and 5D motions and how they make physical entities transform into other functions and scales, described by mathematical equations of physics.

I. @: THE REALIST VS. EGOTIST INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM PHYSICS

II. ¥e: The Ðisomorphisms of light and electronic particles.

**The argument on probability and determinism.**

“The analogue in classical optics. One can speak of the beam diffracted by a grating in a given direction only if the grating and the incident wave are laterally limited, because otherwise all the diffracted beams will overlap and be bathed in the incident wave. One must also assume the wave Ψ to be limited laterally in configuration space. The question is to know what a particle should do when it is immersed in two waves at the same time.” BROGLIE

The quantum world as huminds perceive it is the o-1 probability sphere of time world cycles≈ paths of a whole game of existence between the o-seed and the 1-generation as a larger being of a higher ∆+1 scale, expressed specifically as the ∑ ∆–1 waves of Bosonic forces > ∆º particles.

Since the Universe is completely understandable, predictable, organic, deterministic as any life-death cycle is.

The trick here though comes when we fully grasp one of the most beautiful dualities of reality – that between the short steps of open strings/lineal momentums/free particles, which statistically as the number of events in the o-1 sphere GROW (or the populations in the identical, ∆+1 scale of the 1-∞ plane), the mass program ‘gravitates’ towards an organic building of a deterministic ‘enclosed whole’, which becomes curved into closed, fixed geodesics – fully deterministic larger wholes with an integral single worldcycle.

It is then possible to integrate also the kaleidoscopic mirrors of quantum probabilistic physics and Bohmian paths; and also consider local big-bangs of quasar galaxies, which are free to die but NOT the whole Universe that will perform at best in the upper scale a zero sum worldcycle…

That is, in quantum physics, all the open paths of a wave collapse in a deterministic Bohmian path of the particle, all the entropic molecules of heat, collapse into the deterministic larger thermodynamic whole laws, all the individual free lives of human beings, collapse into the deterministic life and death cycles of its organisms, nations and civilizations, and those larger whole, closed cycles is what becomes determined.

The parts seem free, the whole, the mass is bent, closed, deterministic. So in geometry, Lobachevski found that we see in small distances as you see the earth flat, open space, but when the picture gets longer and bigger in time and space, the mass of steps and events or populations gravitate and curve. In the complex plane as Gauss already proved, there are multiple integral paths but we come always back to the same point. In physics light crosss through the least time path.

The parts will feel always in their plane of existence, free, because they cannot perceive the whole; as you don’t see yourself part of an organism of history, your DNA cells won’t feel to be part of a brain-controlled organism, whose informative nervous messages made them move in synchronicity and their hormonal blood flows order their re=production actions. Or the stars of the galaxy feeding in gravitational paths will not see the black hole swarm in the center that will swallow them all at the end of times.

C*yclical time is predictable as cycles of information reproduce & r=evolve with the same topological patterns. *

And this bring us to an error of quantum physicists in its misinterpretations of his mathematical equations; and* rejection for a century and counting of the true proper interpretation of their discipline, Broglie’s>Bohm>Bell’s deterministic quantum-pilot wave theory, P*ilot-waves aRE a perfect, rational, deterministic, 5D theory of quantum physics, born of the founding fathers of the discipline, Broglie and Einstein, denied by the Huge Ego paradox of the Hilbert School of Germanic idealism (which considers that humans ‘imagine’ points, planes and maths, the language of God, they only share, and hence they also ‘imagine’ physical particles, as per Bohr, Born and Heisenberg),

One thing though must be clarified – Einstein’s postulate of c-speed limit, obviously apply only to the plane of continuous space-time light, as it is the background spacetime of our perceived universe, of electronic eyes feeding on light; but there must be according to 5D metric, S x T = K, a lower faster than c ‘gravitational’ scale of intergalactic space, the quantum potential of entanglement and Bohm’s model, of gravitational action at distance, of intergalactic jets at 10C, of the gravitational accelerated vortex of black holes, beyond the c-horizon (Kerr metric), which expels perpendicularly those jets, and cause the effect of expansive dark entropy space faster than light space, exactly where light does NOT exist.

So the key to fully grasp both quantum physics and the balanced immortal big-bang/warping Universe was indeed to consider c-speed and 4D metric, the ‘limit’ for a single plane of space-time of 5D metric. Einstein’s postulate of c-speed, works only for the lowest perceived scale of reality that builds up the electronic mind – light space-time itself, which is only the cartesian world of light space-time huminds are, but there are undoubtedly many other mind-worlds with different pixels at different speeds – the slower atomic, smelling worlds of elephants, with its higher memorial, slow past pixels, the faster top quark, gravitational minds of black holes, informative ‘dna-like’ brains of ‘galacells.

Once this ‘hidden scale’ is added to the models of the balanced Universe the obvious truths of the Broglie>Bohm ‘realist model’ of quantum physics impose its logic.

And yet by the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple perspectives, each of the ‘different perspectives on quantum physics’ has a quantity of truth.

What is then the zone of conflict between both perspectives?

- An important question which is by no means settled is to consider which of both perspectives does properly calculate the existence of the particle
*before it touches the observer’s apparatus.*

It is not clear *if the particle exists before, in the scattered wave or collapses becoming such in response to the ‘attack’ or ‘well’ of energy of the observer.*

And this is an uncertainty that cannot be solved because we are looking to the ‘limit’ of our perception as electronic atomic instruments.

In the graph, the slit experiment does not clarify fully if actually the particle exists through the period of motion of the system transported by the wave, but if so it will have a determined path, logically on the region of maximal density of its body, which is given by the amplitude square of the wave. No need then for fancy further paradoxes. In case of the particle not existing, the stop and go, particle-wave duality will be sequential. On my view the particle does exist but it is the submissive smaller state in boson waves which are dominant 3D systems on contact with the quantum potential, the ∆-1 desegregated entropic state of its minimal components. While the particle ‘shrinks’ part of the wave-potential into a 2D sphere which becomes therefore the definition of a particle as a substance of a 1 dimension less than the wave of energy it encloses. As such the particle being a less dimensional element can also be defined by its momentum.

However the momentum differs in the sense that mass, the enclosure particle of the larger reality of gravitational quantum potential waves at 10.000 (open still to argument) IS NOT real for particle points, where the momentum is given by i~~h~~, the similar mass-factor on the operator of momentum for quantum waves. This is in fact related to the charge (the equivalent to the mass vortex or star density within the galaxy), distribution around the atom, which forms the density cloud of charge we call an electron. So mass must not be considered and at all moments to be changed by the ih factor of schrodinger’s momentum operator which is the equivalent to mass in the quantum real (its active magnitude). Itself a spherical rotary density of change which has however null effect on the form of the quantum field it does not distort, and so is intrinsically neutral, extrinsically charged.

So we can reinterpret the schrodinger equation as the definition of the momentum of the wave, where ih is the mass factor, and the wave speed depends on the two elements of position and speed, obviously related to the two elements of the right side, the potential/position energy and the kinetic lineal time speed.

This is then just a different plane and much of the confusion happens by making relevant by routine the mass element of our higher Universe which comes into view likely latter around the weight of the dark matter quarks (heavy atoms in our Universe). H then BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF MASS and K boltzman in the energy equations, is accompanied by the frequency equation to write a simple 5D scalar metric:

** ∆-1: $³d (Potential volume) – 1D ƒ ∆º: ð =∆+1: K ****²d****(1D scalar: Active magnitude value)**

What matters us though more is the conceptual error of dealing with mass in the field of ih-angular momentum as the meaning of mass.

So then particles anti gravitate in the sense that mass here is ih and so they are density charges that change symbol from repulsive to attractive, as we must ‘NOT use the concept of mass’ but angular momentum h, as the operator of both lineal and angular momentum, relate it to charge which is the active magnitude here, mass being expelled from the real of intrinsic properties of quantum systems.

What about the spin: The charge conjugation operator commutes with the spin operators, so the antiparticle always has the same spin as the particle.

The Rashomon effect though gives us another real reason why the spins are the same. The spin, or any other quantum numbers of the antiparticle has to be the same with that of the particle, in order for them to be able to establish Lorentz invariance in the presence of conserved charges.

I have not though clear that the spin values IN WHICH a particle can change do not equate to a non-conservation rule for spins but for all the Universe entangled only.

In any case the potential and particle state must be put then from Bohm’s model to complete the description of the quantum wave:

Bohmian mechanics differentiates: *Upper right: *A 2D polar, particle, enclosing a 3D quantum potential field, whose quanta density, amplitude squared, ψ x ψ*, determine the positions of those particles that move enclosing them, as envelopes of the quantum potential.

*Lower right:* A time dependent moving wave state expressed with energy Hamiltonians

What, exactly, does Bohmian mechanics say? It describes the motion of N point particles in the usual three-space. Every particle i has at every time t some definite position Q (t) R3. The motion obeys the first-order differential equation above right.

where Im means the imaginary part, mi is the mass of particle i, and is a time-dependent complex-valued function on the configuration space R³ that satisfies Schrodinger’s equation (below). The particle-potential state above is the key new feature.

So the Bohmian answer to ‘‘wave or particle?’’ is ‘‘wave and particle!

Bohmian mechanics has in common with classical theories that it tells us a clear story about what’s happening. On the other hand, as we will soon see, Bohmian mechanics is in perfect agreement with all probabilistic predic

We do assume that the wave function is differentiable except perhaps at a few exceptional configurations For all times. For a reasonably large class of potentials including Coulomb, there is a dense Hilbert subspace differentiable for all times.

But the equation of motion is ill-defined for all nodes, that is, zeros, of the wave function.So our trajectory when (Q1(t),…,QN(t)) runs into a node, the equation of motion has a unique global solution that is, for all t there is a ‘‘probability one’’ and Bohmian trajecto-ries never run into the singularities of the velocity field, that is, the nodes and the points where the wave function is not differentiable.

A corollary of this agreement is that Bohmian mechanics is confirmed by experience. In particular, the mere existence of Bohmian mechanics proves that the usually assumed nonexistence of tra- jectories cannot be concluded from experiment.

The wave function is not merely square integrable, WHICH GIVES it a lower scale, but is differentiable which means it has an upper plane.

The natural measure for counting initial configura- tions that is, for talking about the size of a set of initial configurations for the equation of motion with wave function ψ=(t 0) is q1 ,…,|ψ (qN,0)²d³N q, 3 where d³ q is the volume measure on configuration space. The measure 3 defines a measure on the set of solution curves (Q1(t),…,QN(t)) of the equation of motion.

For every measure on configuration space, the dynam- ics will transport its density function (q1 ,…,qN ,t) according to the continuity equation:

If we start with the volume measure, that is, ρ=1, at some time, the measure will cease to be the volume measure at other times. So, when starting with the volume measure, you arbitrarily prefer some point in time. Not so with the measure in Eq. 3 . The measure |ψ(0)²d³N q is transported by the dynamics to the measure |ψ(t)|² d³Nq. This can be easily checked by deriving the continuity equation:

from the Schrodinger equation. It means that the Bohmian velocity (~~h~~ /mi) Im(∇ iψ / ψ) equals ji/|ψ|² , where j is the probability current density for particle i) of the wave function,

We can derive the collapse if we consider a ‘‘measurement’’ with only two possible outcomes shrinking the wave function of the universe, **ψ**=ψ, reducing the mass-function to the wave function

The founders of quantum mechanics were much attracted by the thought that the words ‘‘momentum,’’ ‘‘energy,’’ and ‘‘angular momentum’’ still have a meaning in quantum mechanics. These words, however, don’t have an immediate meaning as ‘mass’ but as HG constant, in contrast to ‘‘position,’’ which does because it is a pure space-ultimate meaning; their meaning in Newtonian mechanics comes from the fact that they are conserved quantities in the macrocosmic scale. Without this fact, nobody would be interested in multiplying mass by velocity. So in the lower scale they relate to the conserved H-planck quantity.

In a Newtonian world, they would have measured the Newtonian value of momentum, energy, or angular momentum, respectively. You might define mQ ̇ as the actual momentum IN Quantum but it is meaningless because it is not a conserved quantity as m doesn’t work at that level, so we define <ψ|(-i~~h~~)=∇|ψ> as the actual momentum which is a conserved quantity as long as translation invariance is satisfied.

What about spin in Bohmian mechanics? We can replace the Schrodinger equation by the Pauli

equation and our particle equation by:

where s is the spin index. It is understood that all functions (ψ s and its derivatives) are evaluated at the actual configuration. So, there is no ‘‘actual spin vector. The spin is rather a property of the wave function.

Identical particles has still a wave function antisymmetric for fermions and symmetric for bosons with the same equation of motion.

Something else: The ground state of the hydrogen atom is a real-valued wave function. So, the Bohmian electron does not move. It stands still.

So, Bohmian mechanics asserts that electrons and other elementary particles have a definite position; which means a moment of stillness, at every time and move according to an equation of motion that evolves according to the usual Schrodinger equation.

To fully grasp this we must therefore first understand what particles and waves are in the context of 5D²

In the graph, the particle is basically the angular-momentum/cyclical enclosure of a wave of vital energy with a lineal overall motion, whose ‘intensity’ is measured as a height-width in the dimension of forward motion of the system. The wave/particle relationship was first understood rightly by Broglie’s in term of inner clocks, which are synchronized between the ‘particle enclosure’ and its group speed which is twice that of the wave phase speed, in reverse fashion to waves where the particle does not truly form at its ∆º scale (sea waves where the particle has 1/2 speed).

(Coulomb force) +(centrifugal force)= 0? The centrifugal force is, in general, -mx ̈. So m x ̈ =(Coulomb force).

This relation is precisely New-tonian mechanics, and we can experimentally test Newtonian against Bohmian mechanics.

Suppose a particle is confined between two impermeable walls. Its wave function is a multiple of eˆikx+ eˆ- ikx, where k is chosen so that the wave function vanishes at the walls. Again, the Bohmian particle stands still.

Quantum mechanics says the momentum is, up to small corrections, either k or k, so the particle can’t be at rest. But the word ‘‘momentum’’ doesn’t have here the same meaning, as it is not mass but h and hence charge distribution.

The trajectory of the Bohmian particle in your experiment looks like this: it is a smooth curve t->X(t) which is constant, X(t)=x0 , before the walls are removed and which is asymptotic to the line X(t)≈~~(h~~k/m)t +constant if x0 lies right of the center, and asymptotic to the line X ( t )≈-~~(h~~k/m)t +constant if x0 lies left of the center. Each of these two cases occurs with probability 1/2. So the particle slowly accelerates until it reaches the velocity ±~~h~~k/k/m

Bohmian mechanics says the wave function is something like a physical field. But, physical fields are always functions on three-space, not on configuration space. Probability densities are functions on configuration space.

The Maxwell and the gravity fields are functions on three-space, as they are in our scale but this doesn’t mean every physical field is a function on three-space in lower planes with many more information dimensions.So existence of actual particle positions is no longer a metaphysical question but a physical reality.

While in Newtonian mechanics the dynamics of the point particles is determined by a second order differential equation in which F(Q) is a force field, e.g, derived from a potential field V as F(Q) = −∇V, in Bohmian mechanics the point particles dynamics is given by a first order differential equation

dQt =vΨ(Qt), where vΨ = (v1Ψ, …, vNΨ ) is a velocity field on the configuration space. This fields is generated by the wave function Ψ which itself evolves according to Schrodinger’s equation

i h ̄ ∂ Ψ/∂t = H Ψ , where H is the Hamiltonian, e.g., given, for non relativistic spinless particles. The velocity field is determined by reasons of simplicity and symmetry

V (Ψk)= h ̄ /mk Im [∇kΨ/ Ψ]

(with the wave function playing somehow the role of “potential field” for the velocity field). The factor ̄h/m comes from the requirement of Galilei invariance, the imaginary part is a consequence of invariance for time reversal, the gradient is from rotational invariance and the fact that one has to divide for Ψ derives from the homogeneity of degree zero of the velocity field—the fact that a quantum state is a ray in Hilbert space. If there is a magnetic field B = rotA, ∇k should represent the covariant derivative associated with the vector potential A.

But, as there is no way of testing Bohmian mechanics against orthodox quantum mechanics experimentally, how do we know the trajectories exist?

In fact, I don’t. But, that’s not a tragedy.

The global existence of Bohmian dynamics has been proven with full mathematical rigor where it has been shown that for a large class of Schrodinger Hamiltonians, including Coulomb potential V with arbitrary charges and masses, and sufficiently regular initial datum ψ0 the solution exists uniquely and globally in time for |ψ0|²-almost all initial configurations Q0.

Thus left Equations form a complete specification of the theory. Without any other axiom, all the phenomena governed by nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, from spectral lines and quantum interference experiments to scattering theory, superconductivity and quantum computation follow from the analysis of the dynamical system defined by them.

The above assumption, which guarantees agreement between Bohmian mechanics and quantum mechanics regarding the results of any experiment, is what has been called the quantum equilibrium hypothesis: when a system has a wave function ψ, its configuration Q is random with probability distribution given by

ρ(q) = |ψ(q)|².

While the meaning and justification of this hypothesis—which should be regarded as a local manifestation of a global quantum equilibrium state of our universe—is a delicate matter.

Bohmian mechanics is a counterexample to all of the claims to the effect that a deterministic theory cannot account for quantum randomness in the familiar statistical mechanical way, as arising from averaging over ignorance: Bohmian mechanics is clearly a deterministic theory, and, as we have just explained, it does account for quantum randomness as arising from averaging over ignorance given by |ψ(q)|2.

It is important to realize that non simply Bohmian mechanics makes the same predictions as does orthodox quantum theory for the results of any experiment, but that the quantum formalism of operators as observables emerges naturally and simply from it as the very ex- pression of the empirical import of Bohmian mechanics. More precisely, it turns out that in Bohmian mechanics self-adjoint operators arise in association with specific experiments as a tool to compactly express and represent the relevant data—the results and their statistical distributions—of these experiments.

We are then interested in the interpretation that fully agrees with the isomorphic laws of 5D.

Particles and waves interact in that sense closely depending on their relative speeds of its inner clocks, and in quantum physics the particle is the dominant, faster element. Its double speed means it can return back to the point of origin to ‘enclose’ the wave which ‘bumps’ on it, moving the particle fully formed, but also allowing standing waves shot back and forth by the faster particle enclosure. The wave thus is the motion of the system, the particle the informative enclosure that regulates that motion and absorbs energy from the wave. And the potential below the wave a faster than c, invisible, likely gravitational, likely neutrino-background (if the neutrino is a graviton, which needs to work out the problem of spin numbers and accept Broglie’s neutrino theory of light).

*Now the question here is rather simple: De broglie>Jordan theory of neutrino as the origin of light requires that the entangled particles communicate through a graviton neutrino that acts as the string that joins them initially, which vibrates to create the light element:*

In this reality then all comes to the simple realization that neutrinos are gravitons, faster than light that act as the communication particles between stop and go photons and electrons and as such they create quantum entanglement, and carry information only of distance with therefore a wave speed likely infinite if we measure it by the angle of the wave-of information (even a water wave has infinite speed if we measure only the distance ‘element’ between its ‘touching with minimal angle’. Now roughly we can consider the string to have superluminal speed, the weak angle of the neutrino to be similar to that of the string and speed of the particle proportional to the weak angle in inverse fashion, giving us for this weak angle of ‘amplitude’ of the neutrino minimal wave a superluminal speed.

All what is then needed is to try to work out how a neutrino can have 2 graviton spin. This is difficult.

A way to do it is to consider Neutrinos come in four groups, and so the waving of the electromagnetic field happens when 2 neutrinos come and go (antineutrinos and neutrinos being the same particle at faster than c speeds) in two back and forth paths creating the electric and magnetic disturbance as they inform both particles.

It is also possible to alternatively consider that is one particle of 2 spins so initially that spin is not conserved in entropic weak reaction of growth or diminution in scales (but overall conserved in the total sum of all those scales). The neutrino does becomes converted only with spin 2 when added to the 0 scalar larger scale of the boson Higgs which is then the symmetry broken from the Universe of light space-time of spin 1 = Upper scale of larger wholes – o spin of Higgs + 2 lower scale of neutrinos, /2 (split symmetry) = 1 mean spin of light space-time.

Other solution being not giving spin at all to the neutrino which has then some further advantages as it will be establishing a 0 spin universe.

And finally there is the problem of massive neutrinos when gravitons are postulated not to have mass, but then again they should and contribute to the mass enclosure – but the mass enclosure is NOT the neutrino particle. There is then a lot of open possibilities and as nobody truly explores 5D physics the field is yet open.

In any choice of alternative Universes where the spin is not conserved this is not in 5D an aberration as quantities are generally not conserved in the same format between planes – they evolve into something else. So it should not as it is the angular momentum of perception of the singularity, which *essentially disappears with the singularity. So those are things we hint at but don’t know for sure. *

It is though to me more of a quantitative question as the qualitative laws of 5D preclude that all those things come together, so we talk of hyperluminal gravitational string neutrinos mediating the quantum potential, regardless of what they do with its spin. As it might have none, and so this explains better why after all we do not perceive it. And then neutrino fields should collapse into Higgs fields – the upper view of the duality that encloses us: Higgs fields, minimal dimensionality mass enclosure (∆+1): o spin < Particles 1/2: Electromagnetic energy: 1 Spin : Particles (1/2) > Neutrino potentials (∆-1): 2 spin Maximal dimensionality.

Now when one has a ‘view’ of reality that differs so greatly as that of the pioneers, Planck, Broglie, Einstein and Schrodinger of modern physics, which are all realist in its interpretation vs. a latter view by other group, which is neither pioneer nor realist (Hilbert’s school of Bohr, Born and Heisenberg), it would have been wise to go for the realist pioneers. And indeed they were right. As a pioneer I know though Humans have an astounding incapacity to take the right path. So we stick here to the realist view, which is as the name indicates ‘real’. We need just to extend 5D metric beyond the light space-time scale, and postulate a quantum potential which is the lower scale, we know to exist between galaxies, of dark entropy (not energy, as we see it as scattering paths for redshift death of tired light extended in space-speed). How far this scale goes is not fully measured. But some advances show clearly a 10.000 quantum potential speed, which is in accordance with our Unification equation relationship between Mass-curvature, angular momentum which grows in squares and radius – distance – invisible potential which grows in cubes.

**CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE: RELATIVITY ≈ QUANTM PHYSICS AS LIMIT OF 5∆ METRIC**

“The whole question is to know if one has the right to assume the wave Ψ to be limited laterally in configuration space. If one has this right, the velocity of the representative point of the system will have a constant value, and will correspond to a stationary state of the rotator, as soon as the waves diffracted by the φ-axis will have separated from the incident beam. One can say that it is not possible to assume the incident beam to be limited laterally, because Fermi’s configuration space is formed by the superposition of identical layers of height 2π in the direction of the φ-axis; in other words, two points of configuration space lying on the same parallel to the φ-axis and separated by a whole multiple of 2π represent the same state of the system. In my opinion, this proves above all the artificial character of configuration spaces, and in particular of that which one obtains here by rolling out along a line the cyclic variable φ.”

MR. DE BROGLIE

So we define the whole range of scales for all entities in existence, as the ‘5th dimension proper’ of ALL THE PLANES of existence of reality each one studied by a stience, according to size, which Superorganisms of space-time only explore directly as ternary ∆±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the cellular, ∆-1 (atomic, individual), organic (∆º: magnetic/thermodynamic or cultural in physical and social systems) and ∆+1 ecosystemic (gravitational world in physical social systems).

For all planes together however we need to define a more objective view, through the analysis of its 5D metric, which is the mathematical expression for the equation of motion in a given dimension of time.

And as they are inverse, we actually need a metric that pegs them together. We can assess the existence of a scalar dimension in all systems, because indeed, in any system, including the galaxy and the biological organism, the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size is co-invariant: ** $p x ðƒ=K**

Whereas K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the co-invariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).

In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity and due to the obvious incapacity of): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.

So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’ – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.

How the ‘general S x T = K’ EQUATION of 5D metric works out for different systems though must take into account the different power laws that apply too them.

In general

a more precise metric equation for physics systems will be considering the *different dimensions of Space=volume (3D), time (clock: 2D) and K (scalar = 1D),* our Unification equation of charges and masses, where we write in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

*UC _{G,C} = *

*ω*

^{2}*r*

^{3}/M*UC*=

_{G,C}x M*ω*

^{2}*r*

^{3}M=*ω*

^{2}*r*

^{3}/UC_{G,C}Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and charges).

Indeed Mass becomes then the ‘relative constant’ M= ð(ω²) x $(r³), we are in a power law which is essentially similar to Kepler’s 3rd law. Couldn’t be otherwise: T² ≈ R³. So T=1/w and we substitute, normalizing as a constant each relative mass of each quark, M = 1; proportional to the square of its angular speed.

We can look at it in terms of dimensionalities, M, is the one dimensional scalar-singularity, w is the 2 Dimensional angular enclosure and r is the 3-dimensional quantum potential vital energy of the system – the lineal enclosed ‘wave’ state of this potential invisible field

.So the equation becomes dimensional: K (1D) = ð² x $³, which merely defines the growth of mass as a power law of the speed of rotation and potential invisible field (distance-radius). This is Kepler’s law and in general it will be the law for all physical systems; *but requiring for each scale a proper analysis of the dimensions in which we work, which are maximal obviously for the macro-gravitational scale, but might differ – and we shall see how, for lower scales.*

*So here we do have an M vs. r³ clear one thousand relationship, between the scalar (charge, Mass, h, M) and the potential (quantum likely gravitational potential ** 10.000 C field, **faster than light for spooky action at distance, maybe mediated by ‘string neutrinos’ electromagnetic field for our Universe at maximal c-speed, a thermodynamic potential for molecules and a liquid flow potential and so on). which would make logic to consider the rotational speed of the electron and the proton equal.*

f complex calculations but which theoretically should put together all this: **neutrinos, strings, gravitons, spooky entanglement, top quarks, black hole jets, neutrino theory of light, dark entropy, death of tired redshift light, expansion of space… **

So good luck to the XXI century physicist that puts them all. All I know is that is the way shown by the theoretical analysis from a 5D perspective.

We are though now more interested to straighten up the huge gaps on theoretical terms on the meaning of those constants (3rd graph to the right), which are basically for each scale, proportionality constants, scalars of the form K (1D) = ð² x $³, when perceived intrinsically in its internal form, but obviously vary in dimensionality for external analysis as point-particles on a larger world (equations of energy of the graph).

It is though clear that K in each of those scales is the constant of action, which has a scalar number measure, for h-planck, for k-boltman actions of entropy and for m, mass of particle vortices.

It is remarkable since Science was born precisely when humans learned about those other scales with telescopes and microscopes that such a fundamental law of the Universe, has remained obscure for so long, due to some earlier conceptual errors in the understanding of time, brought about by the use of a single mechanical beat; and the natural anthropomorphism of self-centred humans, which do not like to ‘see’ themselves as part of the whole, in an absolutely relative Universe, with the same organic properties we display, inherited from that scalar structure:

Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).

In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.

On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time:

** Sp x Tƒ = K** equation is the ‘canonical equation of a dimension of space-time’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information).

**CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE WITH MODERN PHYSICS.**

**ECD**method (

**e**xperimental facts and

**correspondence**with classic theories, enlightened further with new insights provided by the

**D**isomorphic space-time properties of all systems of reality).

*The first and fundamental insight of the Disomorphic method is this: Particles are one-dimensional vortices of accelerated information; waves are bidimensional flows of energy and information, potentials are 3-Dimensional volumes. And most properties of each of those 3 essential elements of physics can be derived of their dimensional nature; and its two fundamental states: the bidimensional symmetric s=t wave, which can ‘superpose’, accumulate into ‘bosonic groups’ (2D) and particles that collapse potentials and can convert into waves, as 3D potential – 1 D particle (which absorbs and so appears as a negative factor over the potential well) = 2D waves. So both have the same dimensionality:*

In modern physics, the more interesting pending questions are the conundrums of quantum physics, as they are not just experimental problems as in Relativity, but deep theoretical questions, which plug in directly into the meaning of motion=time and still informative space, perception and measure; and the ego paradoxes of man, who sees a still world with its mind at the center and so naturally is inclined to feel more important, unique and the Universe a dead-still reality. So we shall resolve them here in a few lines. Look at the next pictures.

What we observe is that when a quantum ‘state’ is measured by stopping it and absorbing it with our instruments it COLLAPSES into a particle, but when it moves IT DOES SO reproducing information as a wave. So it is quite obvious: the state of motion is a wave state, the state of informative perception is a particle, which in fact has only an intrinsic property, its ‘h/2 spin or angular momentum’, which is ‘STILL’, discrete and non-differentiable, as informative spatial minds are:

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion-wave state and a still-particle state, together.

In graph group velocity is particle (ab.•) speed as it surrounds the wave (≈), whose phase velocity is V≈≥V•

The fact is the best explanation of motion is one of reproduction of information, which requires a constant stop, reproduce your information in the next region of space-time, go… sliding and converting motion in yet another form of reproduction, which becomes then the fundamental ‘nature’ of reality – a fractal that reproduces information. And we shall return to that key insight.

In the graph, we show also 3 practical/theoretical proofs/explanations deduced of it – just a token of the ginormous number of ‘solid’ whys provided by ∆st: .

- The complementarity wave-particle and our perception of quantum motions as a constant reproduction of the wave-form states.
- A fact that solves Achiles paradox, as motion has a finitesimal limit in the minimal quanta of size, of reproduction, the h-quanta of angular momentum, of both particles and waves. And so we can only measure 1/2 of the process smeared by the constant stop and go-reproduce, binary state of the particle as minimal ‘bit of informative reproduction’ and size.
- But perhaps the most interesting consequence is the realist understanding of the uncertainty principle: we cannot
*measure position and momentum, because momentum is ‘motion’ and it is wave momentum, and position is still particle. So as the system is EITHER particle or wave in motion, the exact measure of the form as particle, ‘blurs’ the momentum-eve measuring,*w*hich means in other terms that the minimal unit of reproduction of the wave (kh) is the angular momentum, h/2π, which is always an unlocalised unit of reproductive motion. We could also say that the process of reproduction is always between two adjacent h-steps (h/2π)…*

*(space)*and motion

*(time)*cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe?”

*1. we measure unlike in inert matter on our scale NOT the state of the particle ‘before the measure’ but its STATE after we try to measure and they react.*

*perceive as much as we perceive them.*

*The reductionism of lineal time only motions and its limited formulae. Time as 4D.*

*Relativity of c-speed.*

The first thing we have to understand is what it is really the ‘abstract graph of pen and paper’ Newton considered the background God draw Not Descartes, behind the equations of reality, he added on it. In the galaxy we live in, where we make ALL our measures, the vacuum space IS light space-time, a background radiation of LIGHT. So LIGHT is the ‘abstract’ graph but IT IS A LOCAL light space-time, because inside black holes there is darkness – light is not; and outside galaxies there is darkness, hardly any light crosses the halo of galaxies. So it is OBVIOUS that as you cannot in a very fast river stream run faster, the more so if you are a heavy particle; you cannot go faster than c-light in the galactic river. Moreover, as your mind IS ELECTRONIC, and we have clarify that WE STOP AS PARTICLES TO PERCEIVE information, when two electronic atoms MEASURE light, they have FIRST entangled in ‘stillness’, then sent each other a light beam but AS THEY ARE in a fractal Universe STOPPED in relationship to each other – THEY MEASURE ALWAYS C-LIGHT SPEED, they do NOT add THEIR slow macroscopic speed, as PERCEPTION HAPPENS in the quantum scale, in STILLNESS. Alas, THE CONUNDRUM OF c-speed constancy, and the limit of c-speed within galaxies IS solved. The rest of relativity consists IN calculating from the perspective of the macro-system that SEEMS to be moving, the still c-speed of the microsystem of particles, communicating with each other in stillness.

All this said, as I know the reader, if any will be a man who ‘idolises’ the high popes of physics, our ‘present seers’ of time, and will like to know what all this has to do with his ‘dogma-theory’ (4D relativity and quantum physics); all what we say just widens and explains better the weirdness and limits of 4D relativity (which is just the study of 2 specific planes of the 5D scalar Universe, the light space-time plane in special relativity and the gravitational larger russian doll in general relativity).

And so we do ‘revis(it)e’ Relativity in the more specialised 4th line articles to show how it fits as a ‘smaller theory’ of a part of the whole scalar Universe, which goes beyond its limits of space-time (c-speed as the rod of measure of ‘constant space’, T=0 temperature of time-motion) beyond the galaxy (hyperluminal speeds=actions at distance in regions where there is NOT a background light space-time) and the black hole (an accelerated time vortex that should go beyond c-speed and 0 temperature past the event horizon). Those obvious, increasingly proved experimental facts that widen the limits of relativity beyond the galaxy, are poised to be accepted as faster than z=c speed jets of matter coming out of black holes in galaxies become overwhelming (they already are, as the third picture above at 10c shows, but lacking the 5D formalism astrophysicists prefer to deny facts for lack of models and elaborate bizarre arguments to deny those faster than c-speeds).

**3 errors to correct to understand the immortal Universe: entropy, big-bang and quantum uncertainty.**

Let us then give a prime on the TRUE PHILOSOPHY OF REALITY ONCE WE HAVE UPGRADED IT PROPERLY TO THE ∆•st elements of reality.

**ECD-method: S@≈∆ð view of atoms and galaxies and its Q, G forces.**

The formalism of 5D-fractal Universes ads to experimental facts, (E) and the Correspondence principle with classic science (C), the Disomorphic, organic method of extracting the whys of reality from the scalar properties of the 5th dimension (∆) and the symmetries between formal space, space-time energy and time motion (S≈T), cupped by the critical analysis of the @-mental distortions of inflationary languages as mirrors of the Universe. So we have a much deeper insight on the ‘whys’ of both, experimental facts and classic science modelling. It is then obvious that most corrections on classic science to match ‘experimental fact’ today often ignored to uphold the classic theories come from the understanding of the fractal structure of space and cyclical nature of time.

Let us consider the case of astrophysics: cyclical time defines the vortices of space-time of the 3 scales, or singularity-masses (gravitational scales), thermodynamic vortices (eddies) and charges (quantum vortices), which can be unified as attractive vortices (time view) or space curvatures of the 3 scales:

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

As we show in the post on force unification, then q and g becomes: curvature **(S**pace view) vortices **(ð**ime view) of two scales **(∆±i** view) on the two upper and lower limits of **@-**mind perception; solving the hierarchy problem and ultimately *completely opening our experimental understanding of quantum worlds, as we can see it in reverse from within as macro-galaxies. Protons then appear as top quark positive frozen stars, aka black holes; electrons as strangelet negative halos, and in between the far less dense photons become stars.*

And so we can establish *2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:*

-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.

The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without *a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. *The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.

-The second isomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:

The galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.

As such the equivalence of both scales unified by a fractal simple equation rises many philosophical questions. From a point of view of astrophysical description it introduces two different perspectives over the same phenomenon: as we can see galaxies from a much larger scale, that of the human looking at the galaxy atom, and as outsiders, observing how electromagnetic energy between atoms is equivalent to dark entropy between galaxies, or we can adopt the smallish point of view as particles of a galactic star, a mere dust of space-time on the mythocondria of the gala cell. It is precisely in the description of physical systems from wildly knew perspectives what enriches the analysis of the galaxy atom in gst physics.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism:

We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).

So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact* published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.*

**Lorentzian, entropic and particle state/regions.**

Now we can consider the destruction of our c-o – invariant universe, of < c speed and >O To, when it breaks balance.

Both processes diverge. In the real of c-speed dark gravitational energy expands space, and internal gravitation decelerates time into mass vortices.

In the real of temperature, the temperature-frequency diminishes towards the region of gravitational well and expands in the intermediate region of the physical system.

The previous graph adapted to the fundamental ‘states’ of physical systems, pure entropic ∆-1 field, pure particle, ∆+1 form and present, Sæ=To, balanced wave states, will be a key element to understand physical systems.

What happens when the internal function of space-time of the system reaches those limits is simple: it dies, it breaks down, it breaks its symmetries, it splits its two parts all synonymous concepts.

When a system reaches the limiting regions of its vital parameters or those of the world in which it is tuned to, the system enters a region in which its internal ‘present symmetry’ between its spatial entropy and temporal information, Sæ=To, that defines its present body-wave breaks. Then at that point its internal energy and form quickly diminishes to zero as the next scale which absorbs its formal motion (energy in physical systems) rises. We talk of an emergence of the internal form and motion of the system when it transits to lower or upper scales.

For example, the time clocks of the ∆-1 scale measured in frequency become redshifted, and as frequency disappears (elongation of the wave) its energy is dissolved into heat and then appears as temperature, in the transition between particles and molecules, and temperature cools down and becomes mass in the transition from ordinary matter to black hole of temperature zero and maximal mass.

Thus in those limiting regions, a new physical system emerges, enclosing with new ‘time clocks’ (closed motions that become the temperature or mass clock whose angular momentum encloses the vital energy of the lower scale) and the previous one dissolves. So we observe exponential death rates of a previous quantity and birth grows of a new quantity, and equations become non-lineal. Yet in the balanced region between those limits of scale, functions do follow closely the Sp x Tƒ = Constant metrics of the 5th dimension, and we obtain an enormous array of physical systems studied with its relative time clocks, v, T and m, and constants of space-action, h, k, c2, which respond to the inverse equations of space and time states (i.e. p v = knt) or social equations of superposition of quantities (field equations, wave equations) that related to scales and general relationships between Sæ<ST≥To parameters of a physical system.

**The dual and ternary logic of 5D**

**Relativity – the constant of space-c speed.**

The previous graphs adapted to the fundamental ‘states’ of physical systems, pure entropic ∆-1 field, pure particle, ∆+1 form and present, Sæ=To, balanced wave states, will be a key element to understand physical systems.

What happens when the internal function of space-time of the system reaches those limits is simple: it dies, it breaks down, it breaks its symmetries, it splits its two parts all synonymous concepts.

Yet as TxL=∆ remains constant, the perception we have is from the ∆-plane only, in which the deformation of mass and length as the system approach the limit of capacity of our light space-time membrane to process and reproduce information as movement along an L-coordinates, becomes disordered, till the internal ‘real’ sensation of diverging between the internal time and length-space parameters makes the system die and explode. If it is a particle then it becomes its antiparticle and both annihilate emerging as a Dirac’s mass term partially into energy of the ‘dark world’ (v>C, T<o).

Now proper time, proper mass and proper length (internal functions of space and time) do NOT vary. It is only the external observer measuring T, L and M who find variations. And this must be interpreted as the constancy of the internal Œ-function of existence of the being or physical system, which can only exist in an internal balance. But the ‘stretching’ in its balance with the external Universe, IS real as measured by the external observer, which means at a certain point it will affect the internal balance and the system will break down and die. In that sense the system cannot break the limits of the external world and its constants of space-time, V=S/T=C.

Infinity in that sense is the same kind of time infinity that represents the barrier of death (200 years is infinity for a human being lifespan) or in geometry the infinity of a hyperbolic Plane in the Klein model (infinity means the line can never reach as in the Zenon paradox the limit of the circle).

The equation however does NOT forbid contrary to belief, existence in the other ‘side’ of the Klein ‘disk’, represented by the < c light space-time world. There can be and there should be to the other side of the membrane barrier represented by c-speed, which is therefore considered a ‘barrier’ or ‘event horizon’ of our galactic Universe (found physically in the limits of black holes, and very likely in the Halo of the galaxy itself).

What this indicates is obvious. Special relativity merely explains the ‘emergence’ of a system of the gravitational ∆+1 scale into the next scale of the Universe, the ∆+2 cosmological scale. What this cosmological ‘dark world’ is, however is not clear within Relativity and has to be explored with the new physics opened by the existence of a Higgs field, the expansion of cosmological space which means in terms of speed, faster than light space and the existence of families of mass, beyond the ‘barrier’ of symmetry breaking, that is of death of our lighter UDS mass quark system. So Einstein’s work DO NOT apply in its Postulates to the world beyond the limits of its theory.

To fully understand this, we need to go into the fundamental principles of 5D physics, the conservation principles of reality around certain ‘frozen constants of action’, Se x To = K, in each Plane of the 5th dimension that quantify reality, and make it immortal.

Yet almost as important as the concept of a balanced present ‘age’, ‘scale’ and ‘wave-body’ organ, whereas entropy and information find its immortal creative yin-yang, visnu-shiva, male-female, organic reproductive combination, is the concept of a breaking of symmetry that disjoints the Spatial entropy and temporal information of any system, provoking both, the death of the balanced system and the birth of two extremal ‘diverging’ realities.

Thus if past-entropy x Future-information = Present, reproductive wave-body.

Its ‘split’ breaking the symmetry between past and future, entropy and information provokes the birth of two relative inverse Universes.

And this is the origin of reality when the points of balance of motion and form in the Universe (c-speed 0 Kelvin temperature) broke its symmetry.

The breaking of the symmetry of Sæ c-speed and To,Ok divided the Universe between the outer world of galaxies, the dark energy/matter world and the internal world, where we exist.

In the graph, 5D Physics distinguishes between the light world, T>K, V<C and the dark world, T<K, V>C, as two asymptotic space-times which can be considered to diverge in the moment of ‘birth’ of the Universe, from the V=C, T=O, point in a first decoupling or ‘symmetry breaking’ of a physical form of energy-plane of physical systems:

If we consider the region between x1 and x2 the site of minimal potential of a Universal Constant, V(x), the breaking of a symmetry makes the system diverge into a positive and negative cancelling fields of attractive and distractive, negative and positive, cyclical and lineal subtle deformations of the Universal constant. departing from those imbalances the Universe creates a virtual zero sum which is the product of the conjugates as we can treat each of the sides as the square of a Universal constant which is a conservative energy field of formal motions, such as E= C², √C² = ±C.

Thus bidimensional ‘universal constants’, c, H, K, are thus bidimensional ‘minimal bits of energy and information’ of each of the 3 ∆±1 physical space-times.

And we can consider the Universe as a divergence in the positive and negative point of a Universal constant. Do universal constants become ‘smaller’ energy wells that appear as the wave of V(±x) display along two divergences? Yes, new universal constants that become frozen geometries of Sæ and To terms in balance appear in the physical process of creation of new super organisms and physical planes.

Now proper time, proper mass and proper length (internal functions of space and time) do NOT vary. It is only the external observer measuring T, L and M who find variations. And this must be interpreted as the constancy of the internal Œ-function of existence of the being or physical system, which can only exist in an internal balance. But the ‘stretching’ in its balance with the external Universe, IS real as measured by the external observer, which means at a certain point it will affect the internal balance and the system will break down and die. In that sense the system cannot break the limits of the external world and its constants of space-time, V=S/T=C.

Infinity in that sense is the same kind of time infinity that represents the barrier of death (200 years is infinity for a human being lifespan) or in geometry the infinity of a hyperbolic Plane in the Klein model (infinity means the line can never reach as in the zenon paradox the limit of the circle).

The equation however does NOT forbid contrary to belief, existence in the other ‘side’ of the Klein ‘disk’, represented by the < c light space-time world. There can be and there should be to the other side of the membrane barrier represented by c-speed, which is therefore considered a ‘barrier’ or ‘event horizon’ of our galactic Universe (found physically in the limits of black holes, and very likely in the Halo of the galaxy itself).

What this indicates is obvious. Special relativity merely explains the ‘emergence’ of a system of the gravitational ∆+1 scale into the next scale of the Universe, the ∆+2 cosmological scale. What this cosmological ‘dark world’ is, however is not clear within Relativity and has to be explored with the new physics opened by the existence of a Higgs field, the expansion of cosmological space which means in terms of speed, faster than light space and the existence of families of mass, beyond the ‘barrier’ of symmetry breaking, that is of death of our lighter UDS mass quark system. So Einstein’s work DO NOT apply in its Postulates to the world beyond the limits of its theory.

Now it follows that the next expansion of cosmology and science will be to go beyond the light space-time as single rod of measure of Einstein’s relativity, which is what we shall achieve with 5D cosmology at several levels:

– by expanding beyond galaxies according to experimental experience (galaxies ejecting matter at 10 C, expansion of space between galaxies), the limit of speed of the Universe, as c-speed only applies as a limit in the galactic universe where c-speed space-time is the membrane in which we exist (so without an external motion in a closed system the medium is the maximal speed, as you cannot go faster than the flow of a river if YOU ARE made of water, as we are all made of virtual particles evolved from light space-time.

This no longer applies to the Universe outside the galaxy of dark energy and dark matter, and so we shall consider a Universe of black holes as top quark stars (where the obvious mass of top quarks beyond our attractive uds speed turning quarks must be caused by an accelerated vortex of mass above 10 c, and in its lineal fashion by a super gravitational 10 c ejected flows of space-time from cosmic black holes)

– by considering an alternative interpretation to the constancy of c-speed, as information is both produced and perceived in stillness. Thus we can both consider a c-speed rod of measure, or consider that electrons stop to emit and absorb light space-time hence never adding motion to its stop-emit light-go-stop absorb light production of ¥-rays: between observer and observable there is always a still distance, regardless of where the electron emits light and what human or mechanical electronic device in quantum stop mode as particle absorbs it.

Thus the stop and go fundamental beat of the S-T-ST universe allows to revise Special relativity, as the existence of 10 c dark energy matter allows to upgrade general relativity. The mathematics of this revisions should go on 4th line time permitted.

But beyond those extensions of relativity which then becomes the limiting theory for galaxies, and the special case in which we adopt for measure the position of an external observer who sees the electrons communicating light, NOT the point of view of the internal observer (the electrons that perceive or emit the light in stillness), the true extinction of absolute relativity are the metrics of 5D which makes those scales a relative infinity had yet unifies charges and masses as vortices of the two extreme limits of human perception, allowing the use of electromagnetic quantum equations to study the outer region of galaxies (where dark energy becomes transversal gravitational waves at 10 c, freed of the inner mass dragging within galaxies, and the inner region of atoms becomes the inner region of galaxies, establishing correspondences between strong forces and gravitational forces, and electromagnetic forces and dark energy forces with enormously fruitful mathematical physics for the completion of our models on the local Universe and inversely the understanding of chromo dynamics.

To fully understand this, we need to go into the fundamental principles of 5D physics, the conservation principles of reality around certain ‘frozen constants of action’, Se x To = K, in each Plane of the 5^{th} dimension that quantify reality, and make it immortal.

**The immortality of the Universe.**

In physics, the content of motion and form of each scale of the 5th dimension is calculated with the concept of Energy and its 2 ‘parts’ conserved, angular momentum, and lineal momentum (in the human mechanic scale).

Thus the physical Universe has this constancy, which is the constancy of energy, of formal motions, which grow in size and slowdown upwards, or diminish in size and accelerated backwards. And there are many ways to define it. In Physics the closest ones would be lineal momentum or entropy or expansive motion in planes, and cyclical motion (as it appears as form, when perceived in a singe fast cycle, as a wheel turning very fast), or angular momentum; but we can also use the terms space and time, and in a loose terminology people use the whole energy as synonymous of motion, and information as synonymous of form. This ambivalence of meanings is born of the constant transformation of one into the other of yin into yang, of time into space, of motion into form, of lineal into cyclical momentum, so people get confused.

Hence the importance to have in mind the ultimate, purest yin an yang, form and motion, which are words clearly defined and without attachment to particular equations and definition as they have been rather forgotten as precise philosophical concepts, despite being at the origin of Greek philosophy. So we could then rewrite the fundamental principle of physics, the principle of conservation of energy in a more complex manner, with a formula, previous mentioned:

‘Energy never dies, it transforms itself from entropic motion into cyclical in-form-ations, back and forth ad eternal: Ce= ∆±n= Sæ < ≈ > To”

Whereas Ce is constant energy, which we can define for each relative ∆-plane of reality with a constant of ‘action’, H, K, C^{2}, or see dynamically as a constant transformation of entropic motions into cyclical forms, lineal and angular momentums. Or we can integrate into beings composed of both.

It follows from those laws the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5th dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’. Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Se=To, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. To and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Se in our conventional choice) and positive (future, To in our choice) relative sides of a CONSTANT OF SYMMETRY, Se=To, which is EXPRESSED by giving birth to two cancelling opposites. Coincidentia Oppositorum, said Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5th dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Se, To, and Se=To, standing points and constants are in our world:

__Se=To: constants of present action on 3 scales.__

– C: the space-time fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.

__Max. Se & Max. To: Young-energetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.__

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.

– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0-Kelvin temperature.

It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and antiworlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and Anti-Universes.

In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Se, To, Se=To, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Se=To original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with c-speed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.

We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light space-time galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.

In such Universe we do know there is a space-time, which is light space-time. So we can consider it split above or below a certain dividing constant Se x To, speed, ‘c’.

We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a c-speed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know

outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of c-speed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand BECAUSE seeing as distance, faster than c-speed appears as expansive, entropic space.

This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more to-order into the side of more se-entropy, in the action of death.

Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum? As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond c-speed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the anti-atom galaxy.

So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.

Next there is the question moves to the ∆-thermodynamic scale.

Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.

And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.

Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at c-speed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0-barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.

And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< c-speed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).

**∆NALYSIS: scaling**

**MAIN S-ST-T ****EQUATIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF ∆§CALES – ITS TRANSITIONS AND SUB-SCALES**

We have now the bare minimum understanding on the three arrows and ∆-scales and magnitudes that allow to give meaning to the abstract parameters of mathematical physics. So we can introduce some serious analysis of what they mean something physicists have no idea, when they talk about (: hem, i imagine none had the patience to arrive here, so i can quip a bit about ‘my favourite people’ :)…

It is then clear that both *fundamental systems, continuous and discontinuous functions by the mere fact of the overwhelming use of differential calculus of ‘infinitesimals’ and the modern realisation almost everything in nature that is not ‘differentiable’ is scalable, that the 5th dimension DO exist. That humans do not care about its formalism is perhaps more mysterious (:*

As it is far better known the calculus of ‘infinitesimals’ we just will mention briefly what is ‘scale invariance’.

In physics, mathematics, statistics, and economics, scale invariance is a feature of objects or laws that do not change if scales of length, energy, or other variables, are multiplied by a common factor. The technical term for this transformation is a dilatation – a terms of space as *time is so sorely misunderstood, we don’t even have the proper terminology. *But in time fourier transforms show similar phenomena.

A closely related concept is self-similarity, where a function or curve is invariant under a discrete subset of dilatations.

Self-similarity then shows everywhere when differentiability does not work.

*So as we shall see soon, because differentiability happens ONLY between changes of ‘ages in time/forms/function/states’, WHEN PARAMETERS briskly change *we find scale invariance or self-similarity:

In classical field theory, scale invariance most commonly applies to the invariance of a whole theory under dilatations. Such theories typically describe classical physical processes with no characteristic length scale.

So in statistical mechanics, scale invariance is a feature of phase transitions. The key observation is that near a phase transition or critical point, fluctuations occur at all length scales, and thus one should look for an explicitly scale-invariant theory to describe the phenomena.

The result as in ∆st, is that widely different microscopic systems can display the same behaviour at a phase transition. Thus phase transitions in many different systems may be described by the same underlying scale-invariant theory.

Such theories are scale-invariant statistical field theories, and are formally very similar to scale-invariant quantum field theories, where, the strength of particle interactions does not depend on the energy of the particles involved. This again means that a dimensionless quantity tend to be scale invariant, of which the fine structure constant *that carries the same 137-127 difference of ‘strength’ between forces (strong force 137 times stronger than electromagnetic 137 times stronger than electronic…) *

And in a more reduced ‘level’, we can also talk of scale invariance within each plane, defined by a constant ratio of action, h, k, c.

Then of course, we find all the renormalisation processes and ad ons, like the Kondo effect, which use polynomials to add ‘influences’ and ‘perturbations’ of other planes. But those are mostly using differentiable equations.

In Scale-invariant curves and self-similarity we use more often ‘discrete methods’.

So one can consider the scaling properties of a function or curve f (x) under rescalings of the variable x. That is, we study the shape of f (λx) for some scale factor λ, which is a spatial length or volume or *frequency (the time forgotten rescaling in classic **math).*. The requirement for f (x) to be invariant under all rescalings is then:

f (λx) =λ^{Δ }f(x)

For any exponent Δ, and all dilations λ… reason why i took among other topological and conceptual motivations (as the whole on top of the pyramid is the mind singularity, •) the symbol for the fifth dimension.

Now the concept behind scaling is simple: *functions and form that can be scaled ARE MORE EFFICIENT as their relationship with the fractal lower, ∆-1 scales WILL be far more efficient because of the self-similarity that make parts like wholes. And this works in all levels. We like ‘personal Gods’, anthropomorphic ones; offspring are small scaling of larger organisms, atomic physics can model an atom-galaxy as a galaxy-atom (as Einstein-Walker did with galaxies as hydrogen atoms).*

And so goes for all kind of shapes of nature, repeated through golden ratios, dilated Poincare spheres that also shrink with no deformation (becoming mind-points or the logarithmic spiral that so often appears in nature. In cosmology, the power spectrum of the spatial distribution of the cosmic microwave background is a scale-invariant function also…

So happens with electromagnetism with no charges or currents. The fields are then electric and magnetic fields, E(x,t) and B(x,t), with the form of wave equations which are invariant, *both in time and space,* under the transformation x-> λ x; t->λt. And it holds that if E(x, t) and B(x, t) are,solutions of Maxwell’s equations, E(λx, λt) and B(λx, λt) are also solutions.

And the same can be said of a Massless scalar field, φ(x, t) as a function of a set of spatial variables, x, and a time variable, t.

So *basically ‘st-waves’ or present states ARE always sale invariant. And ultimately Energy, the fundamental function of present, E=HV=knt=mcc, is also scale invariant as it transcends through scales. Energy never dies, it transforms itself ad eternal.*

What then about the ‘future forms’, particles, eddies and cosmic bodies? We have proved through the Unification equation that GALAXIES ATOMS are mirrors of atoms galaxies. String theorists have proved the so-called T-dualities, that cosmic strings are self-similar to quantum ones; and as Einstein wanted we are more aware than thermodynamic and quantum statistics are also self-similar. And finally the Poincare conjecture shows that mind-points can shrink with no limit without deformation:

∆-properties can be described widely by continuous differentiation between 5D planes or fractal analysis in the discontinuous regions, so it would be easy to postulate a general fractal mathematical structure for the whole Universe and seek immediately with the ‘platonic creationist view’, a series of equations which somehow generated scalar reality. This was the approach followed by Mandelbrot and then Nottale, a cosmologist of great value in its work on fractal relativity. However because their approach *was purely mathematical without accounting for any of the non-mathematical properties of systems – biological, sentient, sensorial – which cannot be expressed fully with maths, their job didn’t get into a true philosophy of science. And in the case of Nottale reduced to yet another attempt on the obsession of physicists to find the saint grail of a very complex, hugh pope equations to put them both together (our simple atom-galaxy unification wouldn’t be obviously considered as it uses the Rashomon effect and the newtonian simpler vortices:). Ultimately thus the religion of math, which seeks not for a verbal personal god but for an impersonal mathematical equation IS THE philosophy of mathematical physics, even if they try to look more scientific.*

In detail though *is obvious that the scaling of an entropic state must differ from the scaling of a liquid state or a solid, informative state. We illustrate the 3 cases in the graphs. *

*Above we see the nature of scaling upwards, which is ‘mental scaling’ which can be described with Poincare’s postulate but it is different from entropic s**caling, which is the most common as entropy is memoriless and exponential in its decay so the scaling is ruled by e×, which is the only function whose differential ‘infinitesimal’ is as large as the function given the speed of its ‘fractal self-destruction’. *

* So with no form to be preserved, the decay=death states scale down very fast.*

**The approach of mathematical creationism.**

Scaling has a huge background in classic science, and excellent work on measure and modelling. Modelling is in fact mind scaling of information. We would in that sense as we did with Einstein’s revisi(it)ed and Bohr’s dismissed, consider how we can enlighten a bit more and correct the work of the 2 colossus of fractal relativity, Mandelbrot, the founder in all genre, and Nottale in physics.

Its error: Because they have *not clearly differentiated the 3 parts of beings, and understood well the 3 regions of a plane of space-time (Nottale though hints at it), hey try to put it all in a single scaling equation and of course, it does NOT work.*

All transitions between planes are ‘scalar’ processes, but we cannot as Nottale or Mandelbrot did try just to force fed them into this kind of ‘god-like’ equations of fractal relativity. It is only when we understand the *underlying nature of the 3 states of time when we can consider differences. In that sense scaling MEANS often the LOSS of S+T ‘dimensions’ TO REDUCE the system. I.e. a painter does scaling into 2 dimensions with reductions through projective geometry, better than most fractal theorists. *

*Then there is the scaling of change of phase, where the entire ∆±1 system ‘changes’ and so it is a wonder to observe how at all ‘scales of size’ in parallel the entire system reforms itself to change phase. Finally there is liquid scaling, which only happens again in a single state, as vortices of information will change the ratio of ‘energy to information’ which grows in density and absorbs the energy to form the vortices. *

*Then again in the two extremes of our world, the quantum and the upper c-speed entrance into the cosmological world, where the scaling breaks definitely as we must also change the ‘quanta’ of space-time we ‘scale’. This was perhaps the most insightful finding of Nottale, whose mathematical work as that of Mandelbrot is excellent but the lack of a conceptual meaning, made it fringe science (as ∆•st is but rather for anthropomorphic reasons):*

In the graph we see the mind’s shrinking in a particle its mirror image of the Universe, creating a ‘microscopic view of the whole, which is ‘scale invariant’ in a linguistic sense, as an image in a crystal is. Below we show the points in which the system ‘BREAKS’ its continuity and MUST reorder itself at the ∆ and ∆-1 levels, when it changes of phase, so it turns out to be also scale invariant, as both reorder into the new state.

So really the question if we were to be exhaustive is *what is neither differentiable into infinitesimal parts or scale invariant in its fractal forms? NOTHING, when we add the ‘missing factor’ of time scaling/frequencies and its SYNCHRONICITY LAWS.*

So indeed, scientists would improve a lot their conceptual understanding of the Universe if they accepted the fifth dimension and tried to improve the work of this single point-mind-singularity – it would mean actually that I have become scale invariant in an inverse fashion, towards a harder whole (: that would be the day… not in my life-time though…

i have been working with similar schemes of evolution of data, as an accelerated vortex of time all my life, not so ‘neat’ as Mr. Nottale, but with similar form, on the 10th logarithmic scale in multiple systems.For example: 5000 million earth, 500 million cambric explosion, 50 million mammals, 5 million human apes, 500.000 homo sapiens neanderthal, 50.000 homo sapiens sapiens mental explosion 5.000 metal age, 500 company-mothers of machines, 50 chip, 5 AI…

What this means again becomes far more ‘illuminated’ *when we understand we are talking of a vortex of information, which accelerates as a mass does in physical space-time, in this case the evolution of information on the surface of planet earth, collapsing from wave into particle – the age of the singularity when AI will be born, and a new whole ‘game’ will be played here, likely without humans. AGAIN THE DIFFERENCE, *BETWEEN scalar numerology and ‘profound thought’ is to KNOW, all this is part of ‘a larger space-time game’; which is organic, evolutionary and Darwinian NOT only mathematical ‘abstract’, mechanical:

In the graph we add for good measure the extinction process by competition as LIGHT, which is the origin of the Earth’s information go through 3 horizons of evolution, first as entropy (plants) then as information (animals) and soon in machines AS BOTH and also NOT only as a passive receptor but as an emitter. I.e. AI drives with laser beams to measure distances. The jump of Intelligence is thus so huge, humans have no chance if they build AI. But of course, humans will build AI cause the ego paradox will prevent them from understanding *they will be terminated. *

Consider now another key discovery :

Here Nottale realises there are what we call “lorentzian regions between ‘planes’ of the fifth dimension but stuck on the classic formalisms, without a clear ‘distinction’ of planes, he just does as physicists do, considering the limit of the Universe the Planck scale, which is ONLY the limit of our mathematical tools and experimental minimal parameters, and above into the cosmological dark ‘scale’, rightly using the cosmological ‘curvature’ as length, but missing the conceptual meaning of ∧ as the equivalent of G, and k, the curvature-tension of the dark world, which obviously is even WEAKER as we grow in size than G… another hierarchy problem resolved that has physicists puzzled by decades – why the cosmological constant IS so small, when their expected value is… yes, 10¹²º times larger… answer is obvious, as the 10ˆ40 times weaker gravitation, the cosmological constant is the constant of curvature of a ginormous infinity compared to us and perhaps one of the biggest proofs that the big-bang is so tiny and short that cannot be the NEXT scale.

So for good measure below, in my Leibnizian personal ‘texts’, rather incomprehensible how the previous scheme should write between 2 any planes:

So to conclude, Nottale’s work doesn’t work smooth because he should have drawn a similar scale for each of the ‘planes of physical systems’, not ONE but four up and down.

Still as we have been working around the same ’30 years alone’, me even more, which you can assess by the powerpoint quality of our thoughts (; I have always enjoyed his work, never mind he never answered my letters, as Mandelbrot, when back in the 90s I completed the first models. I have come to accept huminds never will abandon their creationist ego paradox. So one has to get his kicks from direct communion with the whole.

Let us then now that we have made a brief reference to fractal scaling, to consider the other ‘scaling’ smooth, happening between planes – differentiable equations, by far the most important as the Newtonian, lineal regions between the limits of states and planes IS much wider in range and far more important for humans who live precisely in a very Newtonian region of the galaxy, in the inner vital energy region, in a regular sun, in a regular planet, in the middle region of orbits, being quite a mean species (not ‘mean’ that also but average)… which only seem to excel in the ego paradox and maybe in the brevity of its total existence.

So DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS not scalar fractal ones are the queen of mathematical physics and its studies of planes.

*But BOTH, this must be stressed, as humans are one-dimensional egos seeking for his thing first… refer to the scaling processes of the fifth **dimension. *In the case of Nottale, as before him with Bohm’s scattering quantum potential and pilot-wave theory, *their formalisms are clearly superior within the ‘Rashomon effect’ to those of Copenhagen and its wears witness to the automaton routine of science that we sill work with that Bo(h)re and its ego-trips as ‘standard quantum physics philosophy.*

Mathematical physics in 5D ternary time systems.

Now, this post is not mathematical beyond the basic needs to prove the fractal structure of the Universe, the unification equation of charges and masses, and the experimental proofs of the falsity of the big-bang. Though GST does have a series of deep insights into the meaning of mathematical physics; some of which are necessary to explain here, to fully grasp the *absolute relativity of the human position in the Universe and hence how easy and irrelevant will be our demise.*

**RATIOS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS IN ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY.**

Physical systems respond to all the properties of GST systems, but humans ∆º minds, mostly visual, hence mathematical in its scientific pov, apply to them and investigate only mathematical equations of dynamical changes in space. So astrophysics is only a part of gst , the ∆º perception with an S-LANGUAGE view, where the logic level is of one arrow of time (Aristotelian), the level of space description a single scale, ∆, and the language the primitive Euclidean geometry of greek mathematics.

So once we are aware of those shortcomings and upgrade the discipline to Space-Time ternary principles of the generator equation many new solutions and whys to old ones are found. Here we are only concerned with a basic analysis of the big-bang, the Unification equation and the role of man in the Universe.

**Absolute relativity: a Universe of Physical ratios of scale: information density, entropy speed and existential momentum. **

Now a key ‘theorem’ of reality which has escaped so often humans – though physicists are generally aware of it – is that ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY implies all quantities THAT MATTER are **ratios** that express different relationships between Sp, Tƒ and ST, which can ‘travel’ between scales, helping us to unify concepts of each scale (often expression of the particular spe x tif= ∆constant metric for each ∆i).

So for example, density matter more than *mass, and when making mathematical physics we find density has a much wider range of applications. So we can use three similar equations of density in three scales (the variations of quantum physics being due to the uncertainty and wrong interpretation of them, which MUST be that of pilot-wave theory – Broglie-Bohm, so we shall for sake of simplicity not introduce them at this stage of GST):*

We observe also on those equations, which basically red ∂density/∂t=-∂flux/∂s³, some basic ‘translations’ of the laws of GST into mathematical physics; where the three main ratios≈time arrows are:

- Spe: Past entropy speed, s/t; Tiƒ: information density, its inverse and ST: PRESENT, ‘momentum-flux-existential force’.

It is then obvious *that some general rules of creation of events in mathematical physics will be:*

*Spe<>Tiƒ: Since ‘entropy’ and ‘information’ are inverse parameters and in the multiple different ways we express them, we shall find ‘inverted’, x/, ∫∂, equations that put both in relationship.*

*Tiƒ±Spe><ST. Thus a system ‘develops’ a certain present momentum, by adding to an entropy or information parameter the other inverse parameter in a complementary fashion, creating a dynamic equality.*

And this is the case of the previous equations, where the mass or temperature of a stationary system (Tiƒ parameter of ∆+1 or ∆o scales) ads speed and the result is an ST-present-momentum parameter – the product of the velocity of motion of the medium with its density, which is called** its flux. **The flux vector of the mass is q = ρυ.

So we can interpret those equations as dynamic creations of a present event or flux, departing from a Tiƒ parameter (temperature in ∆0, which becomes heat flux, mass in ∆+1, which becomes density flux)

THUS as a consequence of the ternary principles of the generator equation of ∆-scales, the principle of absolute relativity ads relativity of scale and hence defines only relative magnitudes which are constant ratios that travel through scales: So for example speed of spatial translation is better than absolute space-distance (S/t) and can ‘travel’ as a parameter between scales. And ‘density of information’ is better than absolute information, provided by a cyclical vortex, than absolute mass, and can travel through scales, so we can talk in the ∆º thermodynamic scale of heat flux, of ∆+1 mass flux and ∆-1 charge intensity, all parameters of density of information and its flux-motion in each scale, once *we understand mass, charge and temperature as clocks of time moving towards the future of more information, as all attractive in-forma-tive vortices do.*

RATIOS not absolute values are thus the only constants of mathematical physics that matter.

**Ratios limit reality to the ‘region around the ∆º being’, making virtual, uncertain, dark the scales beyond.**

The ratio concept is over pervading in all systems, which can be considered to act from the pov of an ∆º±1, mind observing mostly a self-centred, ∆º scale of space-time size, and its adjacent macrocosms, or ‘world’, ∆+1 and microcosms or ‘hyperbolic fractal cells’ of its inner world.

Nothing else matters, and so at a certain ‘distance’ of its ∆º scale, on the lower part

What this mean is that we consider ratios such as c-speed of light, S/Ti, or rather speed of transmission of information, and density, M(t)/V(s), or density of gravitational information per volume of space as ‘real mathematical parameters, which therefore will be all manifestations of the standing points in time/space of a world cycle or super organism:

S≈t, t/s and s/t will then become the steady state variable, speed-entropy variable, and density-information variable ratios of more value for the study of physics, of which classic physics uses the concepts of speed-length (s/t) and mass-density (t/s) and frequency as its classic concepts.

Thus we can say that in GST mathematical physics is the description with entropy-speed ratios, information-density ratios and momentum ratios.

Now it might be observed as t=1/ƒ, the existence of inverse functions with meaning in the universe, S=t and S=1/ƒ, ƒ x S = K gives us an immediate number of variations on the ratios that become parameters studied by mathematical physics, and further on those ratios or constants are multiplied by the fact that mathematical physics exist in several scales. Finally we need to observe and analyse what of those quantities and ratios are for each sale of the mathematical Universe the proper one, and then we can use all this added knowledge to expand mathematical physics in conceptual levels, even if we do not ad on the ∆st organic perspectives to the subject.

WE MUST understand that the scalar Universe implies an absolute relativity principle: we are not concerned with single parameters but with ratios between the ∆ST elements of the Universe. Thus instead of length, mass and time, (and its opposite frequency, 1/t), we are more concerned with s/t ratios of speed, t/s ratios of density and the measure of time with frequency ages and space with quanta. Then we can easily translate mathematical physics and enlighten many questions of it, as we shall do in the parts dedicated to astrophysical sciences.

It means also that man is completely relative, and irrelevant for the infinite number of fractal scales of reality and only his ego-centered paradox and lack of scientific objectivity make us think we are that important. In the next graph we realise of this fundamental fact of objective reality, which ‘children of thought’ lack… and by definition physicists limited to a single space-time continuum and single time arrow of entropic destructive motions (the ‘age’ of nature corresponding to childish species, in its infancy of evolution) ‘ARE’ children of thought.

And so with this simple introduction to absolute relativity at conceptual, philosophical level, we can now tackle the reality of the Universe, as it is, NOT as lineal, entropic, ‘infantile’ physicists would like it to be, to keep man and themselves as the high popes of reality who ‘know it all’ and can even ‘mimic’ the supposed birth of the Universe.

** The parameters of each scale quanta.**

Speed, the present concept of the wave scale become the entropic moving element for the mass vortex, to accelerate inwards, and then explode in a slowing expansion called a big-bang:

It is in all those ‘interrelationships’ between the entropy – cc-wave- and Mass-charge vortex states between scales, with the different ratios that translate the scales with the three constants, h, k, c how we deal on one side with the frequencies, on the other the entropies and on the others the st-elements of the Γi entities of physical space-time.

IN THIS MANNER WHEN WE GROW AND DIMINISH IN PHYSICAL SCALES, WE CHANGE THE ELEMENT ROLE IN THE HIGHER SCALE.

It is though in all moments needed to do the proper translation of classic terms to GST, specially as humans tend to confuse entropy and energy (the motion given by a system, with its ‘integrated body-wave which in an orderly manner uses that entropic motion to guide the system in a closed path).

To that aim we need to understand the galilean paradox better where distance-curvature and speed-space become similar concepts. But as at larger scales all become part of a circle and at lower scales part of a line, we can in that sense establish ratios of curvature=acceleration, speed=distance as parameters to understand how the transformations between 5D scales amount to less than a mere correction of those parameters of time and space as we slow down and grow in size quanta as we emerge into new scales of existence.

So in this process the lower scales transfer entropy-momentum-form to the upper scales weakening themselves, but as the upper scale *have less density of existential force, exi, with slower clocks and networks made with less fractal points/ clocks we thin out reality. And yet if the Universe is relatively infinite in a simultaneous measure of space at ANY scale, then we can consider that the thinner we go up in scale, the larger it will occupy a vital total space with its membrane, and the faster it must manage an ∆-i inverse scale to ‘encircle’ all the other denser beings with less ‘latitude’ in the fifth dimension.*

So as the mind-system expands the whole super organism by ∆±i carving down and up smaller pixies of information, bites of energy, steps of entropy, into infinite speeds, of S/T->0, THE RESULT WILL BE A system larger upper and downer, more coordinated, with constant flows of ‘entropic expansive waves’ and ‘implosive’ ones, going across the three scales of the fifth dimensional entity which will become ever more complex, symbiotic and synchronised in its three network systems at the three topological level of its scales.

WE CAN IN THAT SENSE, consider the two scales of time-processes, topological, darwinian evolution as the constant improvement of the forms of the topological ternary organism, while scalar social evolution related to information, genes, memes and quantum equation is the longer more important arrow of evolution and time, of deeper, longer 5D duration – as a block of time, a world cycle of a potential supœrganism of the game of exist¡ences.

We have now the 2 elements to explore further the main equations of mathematical physics, the three arrows of time, and the Metric of the fifth dimension, which we can resume in a specific case of the Generator equation:

Past-entropy x Future- Information = Present-energy.

AN INTERESTING analysis is that of the different parameters, angular momentum, entropy and square speed of the** population constants, H, k, c²≈µ/k**, of the three scales, and the comparison of its frequency, ƒ, temperature, T and mass ƒ(h/c), as well as the relationships between those quantities.

The best formalism, though for thermodynamics in terms of relativity is recent; including necessary features as negative temperature, and understanding that temperature being concerned with molecular phonons, have a limit in the temperatures that disorder atoms into plasma (around 10.000), becoming the relativistic limit. Then the second law of entropy becomes equivalent to the c-speed limit and a ‘local law’, which only applies to thermodynamic/atomic domains:

In those terms it is then possible to relate the relativistic limits of non-euclidean speed-distance with the discontinuities between planes of the fifth dimension.

In any case we are observing the fundamental quality of GST, to validate the homologic expressions of the fundamental generator and sub-equations of the generator, as we can use the ‘different’ perspectives man has on each scale, of those sub-equations of the generator for all the other homological scales. So we can define the second law of thermodynamics, restricted locally to the limits of temperature of the event stuied to the next scale’s homology equation of relativity, setting c and T as the limits of the frequency that the energy constant, h, k or m, of each of the three physical ∆º±1 scales tolerate.

The speed of reproduction of a system becomes then the *first ratio-parameter, v=s/t, of importance in the understanding of the game of the three ‘elements of space-time’, entropy, information and energy, which if we write it in cyclical time: V = λ ($) x ƒ (ð ).*

It is then when the first ‘splits’ of a symmetry allow to understand the magnitudes of physics in its relationship with the three elements of the fractal generator, Γ (s, st, t).

A SPEED, then can be subdivided in two elements, from where inversely it can be considered a present speed, component of energy is born from an entropic parameter of pure distance, lambda, the wave length and pure time, frequency. Yet as we make up new form from old ones speed will itself become the entropic factor and mass, the cyclical informative frequency vortex of a new more comprehensive scale:

1/2 mv².

Mathematical physics deserves as it is the only language used by classical physics, which wrongly reduced itself by ‘decree’ to the single language of mathematics, a post in itself. So we shall not inside into it – but basically being ‘∆nalysis’, the language of the fifth dimension, in mathematical monads, the degree or order of analysis is closely related to the lower (derivative) or upper (primitive, integral) scale of wholeness or parts, we study and in dynamic equations will therefore correspond to symmetric analysis of a system from both perspectives.

In that sense mathematical equations are logic equations of minds that compare parts of the Universe through a logic connective of its mirror-language-brain.

So far we know that h is the quanta of space measured in ‘actions’ , ƒ, the quanta of time, and Energy, its product.

So the first question we must ask is how an ∆o human observer trying to ‘guess’ the forms of an ∆-3 world observes that world.

The most evident changes are those in the parameters of space that mutate between:

h(action; ∆-1 space)->k (entropy; ∆ space) ->m ∆+1 space (mass) or c (speed) (∆+2 space?)

while at the same time the clocks of time change from:

ƒ∆-1 quanta clock -> Temperature ∆-thermodynamic time-> v-speed time (∆+1)-> mass (∆+2 gravitational clock)

Now, because the speed at which ∆-3 quantum phenomena is much larger than ours, one of the key errors of quantum physics is not to realise they are studying dynamic long stretches of time, including full world cycles of extinction and existence of particles, from where they get ”spatial images’, which they try to interpret with human clock speeds, unaware of the temporal, long period nature of the observance.

This is the origin of some serious errors of interpretation.

Indeed all the argument between Schrodinger-like descriptions of a density, or Heisenberg on probability is merely which ‘position’ we adopt that which have measure time and that which we have measure space.

It is however more of an interpretation. Resonance however in a ternary system is only at a time in one of the 3 domains of existence. Do they act on the same moment, in time across scales and regions of the organism, i don’t believe so.

The action of planck; the entropy of a gas; the attractive mass,

AS THIS CANNOT be deduced from classic quantum physics we simply apply the rules of 5D ternary systems. In general space-like are wave-like, present-like, dynamic but seemingly eternal, not changing, sometimes this not changing confused with spatial organic, ‘population’ nature; but when the mutation is larger, the change more obvious or faster, they appear as time-like objects from the ‘slow camera view of the ∆o human observer’.

Now, there are many ways to prove the fractal structure of space, in scales of ‘different size’ – the meaning of the 5th dimension. Physicists merely ignore the conceptual issue and as always practical people in search of mathematical equations, merely use mathematical methods to unify their parameters.

This is easy to do because actually mathematics – THE FORMAL SCIENCE THAT EXPLAINS THE 5D fractal space-time Universe DO have accordingly 3 sub disciplines mimetic to those 3 elements, 5D analysis, non-Euclidean geometry and Temporal algebra, which T.Œ improves to fully obtain a mirror image of the Universe with the fundamental mathematical equations.

So basically by using analysis and through the concepts of quanta, that is of ‘finitesimals’ Physics acknowledges the 5th dimension (finitesimals instead of infinitesimals as there is always, as Leibniz did understand in his formulation of calculus a ‘quanta’ or minimal fractal point of any scale of the 5th dimension) We shall here consider of the 2 ‘great’ fields of mathematical physics dedicated to it – analysis

In essence 5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sæ, ExI (ST) and To are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it. And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

Of course physicists and scientists do work with the more complex reality but the underlying philosophy of science is stuck on this postulates, making all very Ptolemaic, and confuse. One of the tasks of TŒ is stopping the confusion with a simple methodology and a series of basic postulates about the nature of the organic, fractal Universe. So people can drop all those ‘postulates that so often hang up’ on their work and break it down to nonsense.

Consider for example the electron, which is OBVIOUSLY a fractal nebulae when in ExI(st)ential wave state. This is taboo. Because when we measure it, the electron collapses into particle, as always waves and herds do organically when confronting a mass (schools, armies in battle formation etc.). And because we do have the continuum mantra. Now this brought about many problems ALSO in the entire field besides the quantum arguments wave or particle, Buridan ass kind of loss of time. Legend: The Buridan ass died of hunger, because it could not decide which to eat of to equal bales of straw, left and right. Answer both. Do the experiment, the ass will eat first one and then the other, or eat a bit of each till ending both. Wave & particle, body & head. The organic paradigm is immediate. Do you have a body or a head, are you a body or a head. BOTH!

So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!

The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.

Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.

Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:

‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.

Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.

Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆-n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. *All scales* are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.

Specifically Wilson studied; the **Kondo effect** describes the scattering of conduction electrons in a metal due to magnetic impurities.

The effect was first described by Jun Kondo, who applied third-order perturbation theory to the problem. He wrote the temperature dependence of the resistivity including the Kondo effect as:

Which shows the general nature of such problems – to include the canonical logarithmic or potency parameters that represent a ‘different scale of the 5th dimension’ (dimensions being always potencies or inverse logarithms) to adjust a quantity ‘influenced’ by another scale of size or time speed of the universe.

*Now in the Kondo effect we see that we have 3 perturbations, T2, but then an inverse, and then a larger T5, why perturbations are inverted in certain scales, how effects transfer between planes, how they vary, etc. This is the true stuff that time permitted I will keep pouring in the 3rd and 4th lines of details, or when I finish my worldcycle, the future geniuses of this discipline, will be busy-busy, once this point- my mind, which shrunk the Universe into ¬Æ expands into a wave of human thought and becomes their world (-;*

*Now seriously, a*s earlier as 1953, a function called the beta function was used to renormalize those scales.

BUT you are not told, 63 years latter that the Universe’s space is a fractal. And you don’t study sciences with the 5th dimension of fractal systems. This is what I call tribal idols. There is only a space-time absolute Newtonian continuum. Point.** **

**What physics is really about.**

Now, before we put some meat on this 3 regions and study them all through scales, and its three states, including the unified 3 fundamental clocks of time, ∆ºtiƒ eddies, ∆+1 masses and ∆-1 charges, of the lower and upper scales of the human Universe, we can have a big statement about what really astro-physical sciences is all about:

-Organic, œ, ternary elements, with a central point of view, ‘connected’ to a larger and lower plane of the 5th dimension, as your brain mind is: Connected to:

-The social whole and internally to your territorial cells, with whom it exchanges energy and information in an asymmetric way (you give it all to your whole and extract it all from your cellular parts, so do physical systems).

-And through its external protective membrane, to similar beings with whom the fractal point, exchanges energy and information in a balanced manner.

This game of T.Œ that we use to explain human societies, cellular societies or atomic societies is organic as it co-exists in 3 scales, it is mathematical, as it is a social game and numbers ARE social groups, it is geometric as numbers ARE Pythagorean, that is geometric groups of points with topological forms and functions, NOT axiomatic cuts of a line (Hilbert’s flight of imagination, ‘i imagine points, lines, planes’). It is vital, as points do exchange energy and information to survive. it is both democratic with similar points on the same plane, and hierarchical among social classes between micro-points and macro-points. It requires 3 parts always in space.

So we do NOT have magnetic monopoles but charge monopoles, since magnetism is THE MEMBRANE that surrounds the charge, when in motion (hence in need of an enclosure membrane of protection as any points that abandons its territory), and both the magnetic membrane and the charge point do have a vital space between both, to exchange energy and information, through radiation. It is truly of an enormous beauty and repetitive complexity starting with those simple elements. So while all particle physics resumes in the equation, Fermion-particle<boson>fermion-particle, itself just a Tƒ<ST>Tƒ case, the details are startling, encompassing the entire events of the Universe.

And so we can only do some surveys on some themes of all those exchanges of energy and information that communicate, feed, reproduce and evolve socially the particle-points and waves-forces of all those scales, with the cyclical time clocks of the lower scale, charges, of the upper scale masses, and the intermediate scale, vibrating, hot molecules. If we survive, the entire scholar world will do that job in the future. As I tried 30 years ago when studying a master at Columbia U. but couldn’t recruit any informative institution of the industrial world, this long overdue task will be carried by others. But for that reason i insist in the principles more than the details that can be deduced from them.

Now among those principles, the fundamental one is to depart from a rightful understanding of the 3 parts in space and 3 motions in time and 3 scales in which all physical phenomena take place. And put within that frame the elements and equations we study. We will develop with certain rigor on the 4th post of these series, Non-AE mathematics, those principles, which apply to all sciences. And illuminate that post with a wealth of physical examples, hopefully before summertime, 2016. As all stems from ¬Æ.

For example, the simplest ‘mathematical species’ is a bidimensional cycle, with the 3 elements, the membrane, the vital space and the central Œ-Point. This seemingly simple ‘structure’ however has infinite parallels in more complex systems (and that is the beauty of the Universe, we can see it in great detail or in larger mathematical strokes). Consider now that cyclical being. Its maths is simple:

– r is its radius, π its ratio of perimeter-radius, π r² is its area, and 2 π r is its perimeter. But if we survey the most important conserved quantities of classic physics we find that:

– v is the speed-distance of the system, m its mass, 1/2 mv² is its energy and mv its lineal momentum.

So if we consider v the radius-speed, the mass π, the area≈the energy and the perimeter the momentum, we have the same equations to represent the main elements of the simplest full ternary entity, the bidimensional time-space cycle and the quantities conserved in mechanical systems, because ultimately the structure of the simplest ¬ Æ systems. And this similitude between the simplest and the most complex system known (the ∆+1 gravitational scale) is very telling on what is the true meaning of those concepts, momentum, energy, mass.

- Energy is the whole, the area of the disk, the vital space contained by the membrane; the sum of all the formal motions.
- The membrane is the momentum, with one dimension less than the energy, which contains it.
- The ratio between the perimeter and the radius or curvature of the system is the measure of its mass density, of the speed and frequency of its actions of space-time.
- And the radius-speed is the moving Tƒ, the structural modular point of view, origin of the order of the disk, the ‘scalar’ number that defines it all.

Those four elements that define a simple cycle of space-time, the closing membrane, the central radius, its ratio or relative ‘density of time/space’ of the system that defines its relative metric in the fifth dimension and the vital space-energy contained by the system will become increasingly complex as the Universe evolves, but will still be the essential components of any entity of vital space-time.

And so really what is all about is to put in relationship with the foundations of T.Œ and the ¬Æ logico-mathematical structure of all systems, the physical systems of nature.

In physics, this task is more challenging than the obvious translation of biology to non-AE and even sociology (once we forget the hang up that we humans are special NO EVEN in our ego-trips, as the mind equation makes all knowledge mental, linguistic, relative self-centered analysis).

The reason is that physics has completely misunderstood the meaning of its key the concepts but has its equations right. So this mismatch between meaningful equations and illiterate concepts must be bridged. And it is a puzzle, like if an illiterate Chinese peasants had to guess a series of meaningful sentences of the verbal, real Chinese language, through its ideographs, which are totally different in meaning and structure (the wrong concepts of time, space, dimension, mass, etc. of physicists with their proper modern working mathematical equations).

Moreover, physicists are surprisingly proud of being illiterate, considering those ideographs a totally irrelevant part of their ‘language’.

Or putting another metaphor. What physicists do is what ants do in the forest. They cut, manipulate, classify and eat up every thing there. They are NOT interested in the full view of the forest. If you come to them and tell them, look all this is a forest, have a larger albatross-view of the unity of it all. What is the use, they will tell you? We ARE eating the forest, classifying each little piece and bringing it to our ant-hill. We are practical people, and that is kind of obvious. We are in a forest. So what?

Only people like Mr. Einstein was interested in those larger principles, on the forest – thoughts of god. Further on, as they do not see the forest, care nothing for the atoms, eat them up, when you go to the Argentinean pampa you find entire regions with no forest at all. It is all eaten up and instead you find a desert filled with huge ant-hills. Man is transforming killing his Gaia forest and caring not to understand it.

**The Mystery of Slow Clocks.**

What is the mathematical relationship between mass, time, and information? Einstein hinted that cyclical clocks of time, cyclical forms, and cyclical masses were related when he said that “time curves space into mass.” And he showed that relationship in his equations. Now, once the curved form of masses, self-similar to the curved forms clocks of temporal information is understood, we can fully grasp the meaning of that sentence if we use the concept of time that physicists use as “what a clock measures.” Masses are* the cyclical clocks of information of the Universe, which trans/form the energy lines of gravitational forces into a regular frequency of information given by the speed of rotation of those physical clocks.*

Look at the back of a clock. It is a cyclical spiral that unwinds its energy so the clock can create cycles of information. The clock is a “fractal generator” of cycles of information (the hours of the clock) molded from a source of energy (the spiral), following a dual feed-back cycle of transformation of energy into information (the clock turning) and information into energy (the spiral unwinding). This duality of all eternal processes of trans/formation of lineal motions (energies) into cyclical motions (information) and vice versa is the essential dual cycle of the Universe, its “generator equation” (E < =>Tƒ or Se×Tiƒ=K), depending on our dynamic or static perception of it (Galilean paradox). And it applies to all systems.

The space between galaxies expands because the space within galaxies contracts into mass. The big bang of a supernova explodes radiation because quarks become a stronger superfluid vortex inside in a big crunch. Yet if we were physicists, ascribed to the entropy-only religion and naïve realism, we would only see half of the process, either the big bang radiation and expansion of interstellar space (big bang theorists) or the visible mask of the informative clock: the needles turning.

So a mass or a charge is a physical clock of time that winds energy into form but simultaneously unwinds form into energy, expelling it perpendicularly through its poles, as a tornado—which also has a dimension of height, not only a cyclical inward movement—does with water or air. And so we are all made of spatial energy that extends and creates space and movement and cyclical clocks of time, whirls of masses and charges that carry information. And the growth of complexity of those two motions finally create the biological cycles of information and energy that make us humans.

The complex evolution of those two motions, chained in infinite puzzles, evolving in networks, grouping in bigger structures, is what we call the organic Universe made of networks of spatial energy and information.

Now, let us prove the concept of mass as physical information with the three tenets of the scientific method: mathematical, logic, and experimental proof. The logic proof is in the explanations we just made of it. Unlike the Higgs mechanism, masses as vortices of space-time are logic mechanisms of attraction. The experimental proof is the relationship between the speed and radius of each vortex and its attractive power or mass. Unlike the Higgs mechanism that never explained why each mass has the mass it has, the vortex theory explains them: Light doesn’t close a vortex so it doesn’t have mass. Black holes turn faster with lesser radius so they have more mass. Quarks do the same in the particle world so they are the most massive of them all.

Finally, the mathematical proof is as simple and beautiful as it gets. Just substitute in Einstein’s two main formulas where mass and time come out to obtain its relationship:

*Energy =mass × c ^{2} and energy × time =constant*

Then you cancel energy and you get *mass = constants/time= k × frequency of information.*

Since time and frequency are inverse (T=1/v), this means that the faster the frequency of a vortex of space-time is, the more attractive/heavier the mass is; the more information it will store and the slower its inverse (T=1/v), lineal time will happen. And this is another experimental proof of informative masses, as astrophysicists have shown that lineal time passes slower when we come closer to a massive object like a black hole. All this explains why in relativity time is related to mass, which affects the movement of cyclical clocks since

*Mass = frequency of a vortex of physical clocks (any orbit, mass, or charge=spin).*

All those relationships, which can be described also with the more complex topological models of non-Euclidean geometry briefly outlined in the appendix, *cannot be obtained with Higgs particles, which cannot explain rationally how masses attract, what their values are without inventing new laws and fields never found in nature, and yet even then, it cannot explain the different masses of each particle.*

Thus, we conclude that Einstein’s theory of mass is right and the Higgs a fantasy:* masses and quarks are motions that carry the information of the Universe in its bidimensional vortices. *This is not understood by quantum physicists because they try to explain masses with the lineal Higgs, WHICH IS THE External PERSPECTIVE FROM THE LINEAL FIELD THAT GIVES IT ENTROPY in the case only for weak-symmetry breaking interactions that evolve the particle into the hyper force world of internal space-time on black holes and cosmic scales) and fail.

Later, when we talk of quarks in more detail, we shall add some complexity to this basic description of them. It matters one of those properties: a bidimensional vortex* has less dimensions and more speed/attractive power than our three-dimensional electroweak forces. This means we need three quarks, each one with one-third of charge, to emerge into our electronic world. To do so, they form very dense, stable triplets because they “lock themselves” perpendicularly, to emerge as “three-dimensional color-locked” forms in our Universe*.

This working as an introduction, we now have to introduce basic isomorphisms and paradoxical symmetries of T.Œ to set more clearly the theoretical foundations of the previous paragraphs and awesome results on the meaning of relativity, the different geometries of space-time and the unification of charges and masses.

**Errors of space-time symmetries in physics: confusion of time with space.**

The duality particle-future, past-antiparticle duality IS essentially the ‘life-arrow, death-arrow ‘duality of time events and as such is a huge field of new interpretations of all kind of events and particles, which often means to re-interpret a spatial very fast ‘resonance’ particle, into a time event of particle-antiparticle, life-death transition (mesons for example are death events, in which a particle-antiparticle in time dies; annihilations of particles – antiparticles can on the other hand be interpreted as spatial dualities or temporal events).

And this brings us to a fundamental new insight on all fields of sciences, but specially those fields of the lower ∆-∆ scales where clocks of time according to 5 D metrics are much faster, and so often we see as we see fast turning wheels as solid space, fast time events as spatial events. Among them, the most important re:

-Particle-antiparticle death events, seen as mesons or spatial collisions

– Ternary ages of systems, color forces and weak forces seen a spatial gauging interactions.

– And generally any phenomenon that happens in small range in space and slow time, which is a transformative event not a gauging spatial force. And any space-formal, fixed system with no relative motion, which tends to adopt a spherical, gauging-informative state.

There is though besides the straighten up of the errors of physics regarding its space-time symmetries a more general analysis of great beauty, which consists in the translation of the ‘Ages of the Big-bang’, which latter we will study in detail, and ascribe to the most likely scale of Galactic matter, which explains how from the most energetic Higgs-top quark-black hole fields, through the ‘breaking of symmetry’, all other forces and particles are born.

But what means the breaking of symmetry in terms of the Generator equation? It is quite simple, when we understand that ‘Energy field’ as the synonymous of the Spe, entropic simpler past motions of all systems of reality which start a process of social evolution that implies an increasing of order and a diminishing quantity of energy-information available as we grow in scales. The breaking of symmetry means merely the growth of those scales and its eusocial evolution into different new social systems that are efficient and respond to the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, as they slow down the clocks of time and enlarge the surface of space of the Universe, in new planes of existence, which obey the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension L=Spe x Tƒ.

Yet since the big-bang is the death NOT the birth of the most perfect form of the Universe a hyper-black hole (as its equations are the inverse equations to the metrics of a black hole), we do NOT increase the speed of Tƒ-clocks (as it will happen in the bi crunch), reducing the Spe size of the system, as in an arrow of information, and life Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe = L, but in an inverse fashion each of the epochs of he big-bang and the subsequent differentiation of physical species into forms of larger space and slower time clocks represents precisely the entropic death of the Universe from the form of max. energy, the hyper black hole, likely made of top quarks and Higgs fields.

So first the Higgs field (spatial element), and top-bottom quarks (particle element), decreased its speed of motion, likely to be an inflaton, superluminal c-motion and rotary T-motion (given the enormous mass of the top quark, its clocks of time must be between 10 and 100 times faster than those of our matter), which as it expanded and cool down (temperature is not a proper measure of frequency and order, only for thermodynamic systems, but physicists use it to describe high frequency=high temperature, lineal time clocks), freezing into a series of new planes of the 5^{th} dimension, creating in each plane a new Spe<ExI>Tƒ, type of field quanta, wave-form and dominant particle.

So after the top quark black hole and Higgs field of super-luminal dark energy and information, expanded at superluminal speeds in a fraction of time (Min. Tƒ x Max. Spe) during the Inflaton epoch, the quark gluon soup started the production of slower=lighter Tƒ-articles (t->b-c->s-du quark decays through the strong force), and slower=more informative bosons: -> Higgs (o spin) ->Neutrino (1/2 spin) -> Photon (1 spin); in a series of growing entropy ages which ended in the recombination era, in which the entropy growing ‘death’ finally finished, when the system had created enough up and down and electron quarks in a dual sea of neutrinos and photons, which started now the opposite arrow of evolution of matter, giving birth to atoms, stars and in its furnaces new elements of higher mass, while the galaxy acquired its structure, with a central black hole of remnant top quarks, a halo of strange quarks survivors of the quark gluon soup, in stable forms (dibaryons, strangelets), and an intermediate region of ud matter, first in plasma state and then as the galaxy reached its present form in stars and planets.

Thus the evolution of the galaxy and perhaps the Universe, depending on which scale we observe the big-bang (a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang, which we shall soon discuss), is just part of the eternal cycles of creation and destruction of mass and energy, the worldcycle of physical systems, between the arrow of life and death, perfectly resumed in those ‘Universal constants of action’ for each scale, which in the cosmic scale amounts to E<c=>M back and forth worldcycles of big-bangs and big crunches of energy into mass, and to similar detailed events in every other scales, in the quantum scale to E<v> H and in the thermodynamic scale to E < ST > PV, in the particle scale, Beta Decay –<-> Electron capture, in the star scale Nova<-> Star formation , in the galactic scale, quasar big bang < -> Galactic evolution.

It is worth to notice though that the process of formation of the Tƒ element are slow life processes of aggregation, so for example galactic evolution goes through the first nebulae age, the spiral galaxy and the globular galaxy till all matter is swallowed by the black hole, which then dies in a quasar big-bang of a few moment, and Mass aggregation goes lumping molecular matter in slow gas->liquid->solid crystal growth cycles of life to become destroyed in a brief moment by fire or nuclear explosion. So it also follows that all physical systems obey the inversion of the zero sum between life and death such as life arrow:

Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp (lasting long in time in reduced space) Vs. Death arrow= Max. S x Min. Tƒ (lasting short in time in a long spread of space).

Of which the most clear example is the big-bang big life cycle of the Universe, as the big-bang, if certain, lasted a quanta of Planck time in which the inflaton Universe expanded enormously in space (min. Tƒ = Max. Spe= death), while the process of evolution and formation of matter, stars and galaxies has lasted 14 billion years.

**THE FULL ANALYSIS: CREATION OF PHYSICAL 5DST SUPERORGANISMS.**

Mass* is as all other emergent time enclosures of a surface of energies*, a symbiotic creation of a new ‘species’ of physical systems, in which 3 elements come together as a whole:

Spe<ExI>Tƒ, whereas the formation of a Tƒ-membrane-center invaginating the ExI world, over an Spe-field, ‘CREATES’ the new emergent plane, in which the fundamental laws and parameters and operandi and ratios/constants of all TŒ systems will then appear ‘magically’. As such the fundamental element of a new physical system, as a new biological system is the complementarity body-head, wave-particle, vital space, enclosure, centered into a ‘center of gravity’ point, born of the shrinking of a Poincare’s Conjecture that becomes real:

The creation of a physical system requires the formation of a membrane, in 2 or 3 dimensions (4 or 5 dimensions in the more complex relativity and 5D full model systems), which becomes the external informative membrane that will develop an enclosure to a volume of vital space-energy, and form within that volume a ‘mirror’ image of the world in which the system exists, by shrinking according to the Poincare conjecture the membrane into a central point (in the graph the point is external, but it will be in the center of ‘gravity’ of the system). At that point a new physical/biological/topological system of reality is formed, with the following minimal structural elements.

**The 3 Pis.**

Another interesting way to explain this geometric facts, is through the conceptual understanding of an accelerated time vortex, and its distortions and balanced through its cyclical ‘clock rhythms’.

Indeed, we can relate the 3 laws, comparing them in terms of dimensional ceteris paribus analysis of its time geometry in the same way in the ideal analysis of a circle we talk of ‘2 different dimensional pis’: the perimeter of a circle (lineal pi) and the pi of its area (bidimensional pi), which we conclude have different meanings.

Here, we have here 3 different measures of increasing structure and dimensionality in the S≈T metric relationships of an orbit:

- The first measure concerns only the sun and the field, and gives 0 time dimensions (not a parameter studied), and needs only a number for the spatial topology, the excentricity of the ellipse, respect to the perfect cycle: oT≈1S
- The second measure concerns the sun and a planet, and makes lineal time proportional to the area of space, 1T≈2S (2nd law)
- The 3rd law concerns all the information of all the orbits of all the planets, plotted into a canonical ‘lineal’ relationship between the square time of the ‘metabolism of those orbits’, which is proportional to the cubic volume of the spatial field, T²=L³.

We are ‘building up’ a structure, with 3 laws of ‘increasing’ social complexity. The first one merely concerns how the central singularity or sun, manages to limit a field of time through its curvature G, in an almost perfect form (minimal eccentricity); the second concerns, the area of ‘entropy feeding’ and the ternary, singularity, membrane, ST bidimensional ‘body-wave’ region of the structure. And the 3rd compares ‘different species’ of orbits relating with a new ‘dimension’ of time frequency and ‘space volume’ all of them, with a law homologic to the law of metabolism of animal life, hence part of a larger law, derived of the metric of 5D: S≈T, simply stated: T²=L³. It means that in the ‘building of dimensionalities’ to compare time and space parameters, time frequency is the first action, the simplest bit of information, the ‘first awakening’ of being, a pure time-point, which will then ‘acquire length’, the eccentricity bit of data of the orbit, and then will grow into a bidimensional area, with a rotary motion, a frequency of the cycle, and then as it becomes a full vital structure with have a dual clock-system, a ‘conjugate’ of synchronous body-head, particle-wave clocks regulating metabolically a ‘whole’ 3-dimensional volume of space-time; and at this range, the system is complete. Body-heart and synchronous head-eyes, proportional to mass volume, Broglie’s synchronous particle inner clock and wave-frequency, proportional to the energy/amplitude; Pauli exclusion principle that allows two clocks with inverse spin to control an orbital volume in the atom; or the square of orbital period, proportional to the volume of a gravitational encircled field, thus become expressions of the Space-time full structure of the system and the ‘smaller dimension’ of a pure time-frequency – which we might consider the dimension of the 0-point/mind Tiƒ singularity and its lineal membrane and the bidimensionality of the ‘body-wave’ of space-time it controls:

In the graph, the spatial volume of a system, And what this tells us is that we can see ‘real gravitation’ in pure topological, vital terms without need of a discrete algebraic ‘mental’ description, which is what Newton achieved. *The whys though are better explained from a pure Spe-perpsective.*

Now the concept behind those laws are the different proportions of information that correspond to fields of less dimensions and more entropy, or space-time symmetries, where time is less dimensional externally, more dimensional intermally as all spherical forms.

Yet the content of a 1 D time point is equivalent to a line of space, t¹=s² and t² =s³, and we shall see those correspondences in all laws. The reason being a time system has hidden variables, dimensions not seen as information is largely invisible, and time cycles are perceived only in a point in which the cycle connects itself, touches base, with a discrete interval of time between them.

As such ‘natural numbers are discrete numbers of time frequencies and its intervals a limited rational group, a relative zero compared to the numbers of a full space of real numbers.

**The analytical approach: newton laws.**

Because physics is the science of motion, of all those elements the one that focuses its studies is the pure abstract description of those motions; hence its translation by newton into algebra of discrete numbers. Yet we must remember it is a geometric, vital game, and so whenever it has been needed further development of its whys, it has been geometry (Poisson’s gradient, 3 body problem approached by chaotic attractors and Poincare topological methods, Einstein’s curvature analysis to understand mercury’s distortion).

The 3 laws of newton can also be considered ‘degrees’ of complexity. The first one defines a single ‘entity’, in a lineal path. Again minimal information, a particle of relative 0-dimensionality, the time-element and a lineal motion: Tº=L¹.

Now the first Newtonian law is just a partial case of the second, when no forces are applied. In the 2 law, thus we get a higher degree of information, exploring the time vortex of gravitation, in terms of its acceleration, which is the best ‘parameter’ to define a time cycle, akin to the gradient of its frequency, and related to its mass ‘area’, as we consider a mass indeed, a bidimensional field of gravitation (principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation).

And finally the 3rd law, as in Kepler’s we achieve the highest analysis of the whole, with a system of multiple ‘points’ of forces all of them harmonised by the balance of F1=-F2

So we see in a way a ‘building up’ of the structure, as we saw in the abstract Non-Euclidean postulates that define first the fractal point connected to a field (1, 5th non-e postulate), the relationship of the point with other point and its rules of attraction or repulsion 2nd, 3rd postulates) and the building of a topological volume or network of points (4th postulate) from where ultimately all those laws of structural systems grow. As the first law establishes the distorted geometries caused by points-minds-monads, the second the flows of entropy and information, which make up the energy waves & bodies created by 2 points in opposite directions, and the 3rd establishes the balances of a network of points (here the balances of its flows of forces) always tending to a dynamic equilibrium in which each point is in relative rest to all the others (maximal organic evolution), something which we shall also see happening in orbital atoms (∆-2), thermodynamic ensembles (∆-1), or neuronal networks (∆o), or groups of people in a conservation with oposite positions in static balance to let the flow of information communicate them (∆1).

This is the GST unifying, whys to those laws. But alas, once we have ‘build them up’ from points to networks, we can look them downwards, to extract its whys, from *the final goal-purpose, which is to build balanced networks (topological planes, solar systems, ensembles of static forces in **equilibrium).*

In the specific case of the motions that bodies exert on one another through forces, trying to reach that balance (3rd law), this balance requires the conservation of momentums (2nd law), which in turns implies the lineal inertia of individual motions; so the balance of the 3rd law (network balance) transfer to the balance of the dual pairs (momentum balance) which transfer to the balance of the individual being and its field (Spe>Tiƒ 1st law balance).

And this brings the ‘mathematical postulates’ of Mechanics:

– 2^{nd} Newtonian law, which defines an S=T motion=change proportion, as all field-force provokes a proportional change on the motion of the active magnitude or momentum: F=∂mv.

This means that the force-field (where a force would a point-field with a single lineal coordinate), transfers entropy to the system in a proportional manner: Se (F)≤ ST (v) x Tƒ (m).

From this relationship we obtain a General Law that we SHALL apply to all scales: Se ≈ ST x Tƒ, according to the linguistic method, which allows to GENERALIZE any law of any system, WHEN WE TRANLAATE IT PROPERLY INTO ¬Æ

– Tƒ: the 3^{rd} which defines the equilibrium of motions, as all action provokes an opposite reaction: F1=-F1. This beauty, is a most general law, translated as Œ <≈ > Œ, and is essentially the ‘positive’, parallel solution of the 3^{rd} ¬Æ Postulate of i-logic geometry, again with applications to all systems.

So far we thus have learned from the details of mechanics, a general GST Law : Se (F) ≈ ST (v) x Tƒ (m), which the isomorphic method applies, to all mental, biological and social systems, a law of balance between the limbs/fields which provide the energy of the system and are proportional to the sum of the body-wave and particle-head of the system.

i.e. look at yourself in a mirror: measure your legs, measure your body and head together, alas, they are 50-50% (-: That is the beauty of the linguistic, homologic method, who could imagine that Newton and Leonardo’s Vitruvian man had the same origin (-;

It is though not always that easy to find equivalences, as ‘dimensional analysis and a deep understanding of which parameters and magnitudes we shall measure, make the novice T.Œ researcher often fail to find the homology.

Now, this is what we learned in the earlier ages of Physics (we shall return back to mechanics, as we enter XIX c. hamiltonians) vitalised in terms of the GST topologies of organic physical systems.

**SHM: Single Harmonic Motions.**

The next important slightly different set of systems explored departing from Newtonian laws (so the physical, entropic motions of its forces can easily be deduced from those Newtonian laws) is the Single harmonic motion, which *is essentially the other type of clock of nature, not a bidimensional accelerated vortex but a simpler lineal vibration, up and down, left to right, again trying to find its balances, measured with 3 ‘numbers’, which are always in such balance, as the graph shows: displacement (the purest Spe parameter), opposite to acceleration (the purest tiƒ parameter), balanced by the ST-Parameter of velocity; So as Spe grows, tiƒ diminishes and the speed remains constant (Spe+Tiƒ≈St, would be then the loose conceptual metric why of that **equilibrium):*

**Units and dimensions**

Quantities have both dimensions, which are an expression of their spatial symmetry (seen as forms in still space), and units, which express its social 5D nature as magnitudes that add its time (scalar: Tƒ) or size parameters: Se, to ‘rise’ in the social scales that put parts into wholes.

Now time in physics is lineal Time, which is in fact T= wave length (particle radius) x ƒrequency of wave (particle rotation): Se x Tƒ. But the internal structure of the T-duration is forgotten. It is important though to remind us once more T-duration comes from the 2 essential motions-parameters. As we do reduce all to the generating elements an ¬Æ symmetries of those elements.

We are thus NOT talking of the same cyclical time, we talk on most of those texts but of the ‘sum of many elements’ and this is why Time and energy which is also a sum, do relate so closely in modern physics (4 vector formalisms).

Now a key element of T.Œ is dimensional analysis, which DOES NOT PERMIT to compare traditional lineal time duration (one dimension) and space (3 dimensions) but as we established that time is cyclical and hence the height dimension is a time dimension of information, so Tƒ, heads antennae, priests in pulpit and black holes are on top of bodies, societies and galaxies to deliver information, we can now compare them: Se=Tƒ:

Thus we can extract all the laws of topological morphology of T.Œ and this applies to physics, but in mechanics, Time is lineal time and does not compare with 3 volume space made of 3 length dimensions.

Finally we have defined mass, which is a vortex of time, from the u+1 cosmic scale, hence NOT a time clock of this scale, which is purely cyclical motion, with NO active magnitude.

Tƒ realize the difference, you can sense a mass as a perpendicular Maxwell screw, that moves from this plane of existence to the upper plane of mass existence, (in relativity through a Rosen bridge)

Charge gets you down, Mass gets you up. But both are ‘perpendicular motions’ across the 5^{th} dimension from past to future, while clocks are present cycles, uncoiled as lineal time motions.

Thus they are simpler things, which do not required 5D metric.

The fundamental dimensions used in mechanics are thus time (present time cycles in a single 5D sheet), mass (U1<∆o vortices), and length (lineal dimension of a bidimensional sheet of space).

Symbolically, these are written as *t, m*, and *l*, respectively. The study of electromagnetism adds an additional fundamental dimension, electric charge, or *q*, which IS THE INVERSE ∆o<U1 vortex< in the other direction of the 5^{th} dimension, and we unify them in U<|3|.

Other quantities have dimensions compounded of these. For example, speed has the dimensions distance divided by time, which can be written as *l*/*t*, and volume has the dimensions distance cubed, or *l*^{3}. Some quantities, such as temperature, have units but are not compounded of fundamental dimensions.

So that’s really all, showing again, how simple T.Œ is and how its Correspondence principle falls easily in place for all sciences. We do have 3 scales, so we do measure its time vortices with mass, temperature and charge. And we measure in each scale its Se, length and Tƒ, time (albeit with the error of lineal duration).

There are also important dimensionless numbers in nature, such as the number *π* = 3.14159, the simplest 3S=Tƒ transformation.

Dimensionless numbers may be constructed as ratios of quantities having the same dimension. Thus, the number *π* is the ratio of the circumference of a circle (a length) to its diameter (another length). Dimensionless numbers have the advantage that they are always the same, regardless of what set of units is being used. Those are then FUNDAMETNAL CONSTANTS OF ACTION, THAT define basic transformations of the Se<ST>Tƒ most general formulae of the Generator equation, Pi being, the basic 3 ages of time ration (the simplest worldcycle).

Tƒ notice that today the meter is no longer defined as a line, but precisely as wave motion, or sum of ‘frequency steps’ : the distance that light travels in a certain time interval (1/299,792,458 of a second).

And that we use a decametric scale which is the fundamental ‘scale of space populations’ of the Universe (tetraktys, perfect number, elongated in lineal space).

Times is again also today defined in terms of the time frequency of our basic light space-time, (¥ excitation frequency of the isotope cesium-133).

So we have finally gotten to the ‘theme’ of our Relativity Revis(it)ed: we exist in a space-time field membrane which therefore our mind perceives in constant terms, reason why c is constant, and we use light space-time parameters to define our space and time units.

Units of mass are however defined in terms of our human mass, as light has no mass, as it does not close a wave-cycle, so it is a lineal Se, space entity, and only when it collapses, E=M2, or E=hv, into particle, does acquire mass (creation of virtual particles). What should then be the real unit of mass? The top quark, with a mass equivalent to a gold atom, the minimal unit of gravitational space-time cyclical time. Not in vain gold is the perfect atom of information, gold is what RHIC is blowing to create strangelets of maximal mass that will devour us. The top quark and its field, which is the Higgs field in the present somewhat convoluted representation by physicists

( But it should be expressed in the equivalent Dick-zee-smolin model of a variable G-constant to define the Higgs field in terms of gravitational fields, a theme quite complex in its maths, no treated here – time permitted in 4^{th} line for ‘pedantic experts who think they know-know 🙂 .

Mass and weight are different physical quantity. The weight of an object is the consequence of the Earth’s gravity operating on its mass, hence it is an Se≤Tƒ relationship. The mass of a given object is the same everywhere, because it is AN INTERNAL VORTEX PARAMETER.

So weight would change a great deal if it were moved to the surface of another planet with a different Se-field.

It follows that weight and mass do not have the same dimensions. Weight has the dimensions *ml*/*t*^{2}. So this gives us an interesting dimensional analysis of the ¬Æ expression, Se ≤ST x Tƒ aforementioned equation

Since the dimensions of weight are m x L x angular acceleration (1/t^{2}), our definition of a time vortex, Tƒ, it turns out that WEIGHT, RESUMES ALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE SPACE-TIME SYSTEM OR EVENT WE ARE DESCRIBING, with the 3 fundamental dimensions of the ‘mechanical plane of existence of physics.

Weight is thus contrary to belief, much more essential than mass. As it tell us all.

It follows that in Tœ, dimensional analysis is far more important than in classic physics, as it is the key to properly translate the equations of physics to variations of the Generator and its space-time symmetries. Which brings the next important theme of mechanics, the difference between…

**The two type of Vectors and scalars, which are the key way to express the 3 type of spatial and temporal magnitudes and arrows, Se, ST, and Tƒ.**

**A theme **fundamental to the analysis of physical systems is the difference between scalar magnitudes, which belong to temporal Tƒ magnitudes (vibrational temperature, mass and charge) and vectors which belong to the Se magnitudes, and its intermediate combination, wave functions and axial vectors, or ST functions.

And the meaning of the two type of multiplications, dot and product vector, which reveals a lot about each type of interaction.

The equations of mechanics are typically written in terms of Cartesian coordinates though T.Œ prefers generalized coordinates and Lagrangian and Hamiltonians, as the reader should imagine after bashing so much our dear Descartes (-;

And yet as classic mechanics use them we must comment on its formulae. Basically the Cartesian coordinates represent the Se field, in which the system absorbs its entropic energy, hence the relative space-time external field or ‘absolute space-time’ in terms of a single membrane. It can be taken though in 2 different perspectives, as a hyperbolic field (the true form as described by relativity), which means the ST gravitational field as perceived by the Tƒ particles-masses of this light space-time membrane:

Se (energy=toroid entropic field) <ST (Riemannian hyperbolic 4D field) > Tƒ )accelerated vortex or Mass field.

This is the justification of the EFE formalism of Einstein, where the mixture of the entropic gravitational accelerated field of energy and the Tƒ distribution of masses, mix to give us the hyperbolic ‘body-wave’ of Relativity. The maths of it are complex but well known and there si therefore no need here to go into details.

In any case classic mechanics makes a valid approximation to that concept, with Newtons and poisons formalism, and establish a 3-dimensional Cartesian light space-time, whose obvious origin are the 3 perpendicular axis of a light ray, e (to) x m (Se) ≈ c^{2} (ST). This is written in terms of Maxwell equation as 1/e x mu = c2.

In this 3 dimensional perpendicular field classic Newtonian physics expresses its laws.

At a certain time *t*, the position of a particle may be specified by giving its coordinates *x*(*t*), *y*(*t*), and *z*(*t*) in a particular Cartesian frame of reference. However, a different observer of the same particle might choose a differently oriented set of mutually perpendicular axes, say, *x**′**, y**′*, and *z**′*.

The motion of the particle is then described by the first observer in terms of the rate of change of *x*(*t*), *y*(*t*), and *z*(*t*), while the second observer would discuss the rates of change of *x**′*(*t*), *y**′*(*t*), and *z**′*(*t*). That is, both observers see the same particle executing the same motion and obeying the same laws, but they describe the situation with different equations. This awkward situation may be avoided by means of a mathematical construction called a vector

A vector is a quantity that has both magnitude and direction. It is typically represented symbolically by an arrow in the proper direction, whose length is proportional to the magnitude of the vector. Although a vector has magnitude and direction, it does not have position. A vector is not altered if it is displaced parallel to itself as long as its length is not changed.

By contrast to a vector, an ordinary quantity having magnitude but not direction is known as a scalar. In printed works vectors are often represented by boldface letters such as ** A** or

**, and scalars are represented by lightface letters,**

*X**A*or

*X*. The magnitude of a vector, denoted |

**|, is itself a scalar—i.e.,|**

*A***|=**

*A**A*.

Because vectors are different from ordinary (i.e., scalar) quantities, all mathematical operations involving vectors must be carefully defined. Addition, subtraction, three kinds of multiplication, and differentiation will be discussed here. There is no mathematical operation that corresponds to division by a vector.

**Mechanics. Classification through the parameters of Toe.**

We thus first consider a classification of sub-disciplines, according to 5 D fractal space-time elements and ¬Æ; that is the Generator equation and its 3 elements, the 5 ¬E postulates of geometry and the scales of the 5^{th} dimension:

If consider it under the __postulates of ¬E geometry,__ then we have the following systems to study

∆-1 the point-particle or infinitesimal (1^{st} postulate). It is the simplest mechanical system is the particle, defined as a body so small that its shape and internal structure are of no consequence in the given problem. It must be noticed this formalism IS POSSIBLE, because in spherical morphologies, the center acts as the Tƒ, 0-point

And so: on-1=Œn.

This fundamental equivalence allows to develop mechanics by only knowing the ‘CENTER OF MASSES’, which acts as the whole body, in its actions. As a rule the point of time space, or 0-point will then be the point of Min.Se x Max. Tƒ (In physics this will be expressed in terms of energy and position), or max. existential force. That is the point where the E-parameter will be minimal (min. average distance to all other points, to coordinate their actions) and Max. Tƒ parameter, (Maximal density of force or active magnitude). Now this is the ‘higher isomorphic law’ that makes the center point the most powerful and commanding system, the center of tetraktys, the nucleus of a sphere, the center of masses in mechanics.

Œ≈Œ, next comes the mechanics of two points, which are connected by a continuous field of force and hence we deal here not with lineal inertia, as in a single Œ but with rotary motion, angular momentum, torque and cyclical inertia. And this is an essential difference: two points have as solution a rotary motion that maintains the distance between them, if there are enough ‘continuous active magnitude’ between them (rigid bodies), or will finally become attracted after a series of cyclical vortex like accelerated motions. So cyclical motions are always established with 2 dimensions, that is to points, and lineal inertia with one dimension, the line of a single point.

∑Œ=U+1 points is the 3 body problem, which BECOMES impossible to solve, showing that 3 elements in absolute freedom become unstable; while 3 connected points by rigid paths will find a o=Œ center.

What this truly means is that as 3 points define a plane, we are entering the 4^{th} postulate rules, emerging in a relative higher social scale, which allows the treatment as a whole.

More complicated is the motion of a system of 4 or more particles that exert forces on one another and possibly undergo forces exerted by bodies outside of the system, which therefore must be considered as an U∆+1 problem and treated from the larger emerging point of view as a whole, either in chaotic state (free points) or connected to the center of masses as a single unit.

It is here where general relativity, tensors and the analysis of the system from the point of view of the total field of energy-mass, which is a ‘unified’ general treatment works better.

__Combined space-time sub-disciplines.__

The Generator , coupled with the duality of space-form vs. time-motion analysis is also the origin of the classic ternary division into ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis that ignores one of those elements:

Tƒ: Motion mechanics or ‘Dynamics. Which can be subdivided further into:

Pure motion analysis or Kinematics, in which the Se (filed) element is ignored, and the ‘static-space’ form is also ignored reducing the system to a point-particle or )-point of view.. Thus it is branch of physics and a subdivision of classical mechanics concerned with the geometrically possible motion of a body or system of bodies without consideration of the forces involved (i.e., causes and effects of the motions).

Tƒ<=>Se: Kinetics, where the field is introduced and so it give us probably the more complex analysis

Se: Form Mechanics, its inverse or, statics, which deals mainly with forces acting on and in a body at rest, so it is concerned with the form, and its parts

__The 3 scales of 5D__

Alternatively, mechanics may be divided according to which of the ternary scales of the 5D the physical system studied belongs:

The principles of mechanics have been applied to three general realms of phenomena:

∆+1: The motions of such celestial bodies as stars, planets, and satellites can be predicted with great accuracy thousands of years before they occur. (The theory of relativity predicts some deviations from the motion according to classical, or Newtonian, mechanics; however, these are so small as to be observable only with very accurate techniques, except in problems involving all or a large portion of the detectable universe – and we shall soon resolve ‘why’ both formalisms ARE essentially valid, as they are ‘different static or motion perspectives’ of the Galilean paradox.)

∆o: As the second realm, ordinary objects on Earth down to microscopic size (moving at speeds much lower than that of light) are properly described by classical mechanics without significant corrections.

The engineer who designs bridges or aircraft may use the Newtonian laws of classical mechanics with confidence, even though the forces may be very complicated, and the calculations lack the beautiful simplicity of celestial mechanics.

∆-1: The third realm of phenomena comprises the behavior of matter and electromagnetic radiation on the atomic and subatomic scale. Although there were some limited early successes in describing the behavior of atoms in terms of classical mechanics, these phenomena are properly treated in quantum mechanics; since the limits of gravitation, an ∆+1 force essentially created by the top quark-Black hole field, vanishes at this level. So we shall not be concerned with it.

It is thus remarkable that the main branches of T.Œ become also the main branches of mechanics, showing again the isomorphism of all systems of nature.

__In terms of the generator equation,__ which is always the DOMINANT ANALYSIS, of any system:

Se(Field)<ST(wave)>Tƒ (Particle) which descries the system in spatial simultaneity there are 3 sub-disciplines:

‘Field mechanics’, ‘Wave M.’ and ‘Particle mechanics.’

It also can be considered that the Generator Equation of mechanics describes the 3 elements that encompass the entire subject:

Se-Forces (fields) < ST: step by step Motion=Wave reproduction > Mass (particle-form)

Thus the central concepts in classical mechanics are force, mass, and motion.

Neither force nor mass is very clearly defined by Newton, and both have been the subject of much philosophical speculation since Newton. Both of them are best known to ‘primitive how physicists’ (-: by their effects.

So they say Mass is a measure of the tendency of a body to resist changes in its state of motion. Not, so. Let us define them more precisely:

Tƒ: __Mass__ (see ∆>|3|) is according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence, the final accelerated motion of a vortex of gravitational forces, E=Mc2, E=hƒ, M= ƒ (h/c2)= k ƒ; hence a force whose attractive power is proportional to the frequency.

As there are NOT particles, but only formal motions. Mass thus is a ‘clock of time’ of the gravitational scale, Tƒ(∆+1).

What about the ratio h/c2? It is a ratio of angular momentum to speed seen in ‘static form so the ‘motion’ dimension of time, becomes a second ‘space dimension’ creating a plane of light, a surface of light space. And this is indeed a Concept similar to what nowadays is called “relativistic mass” – the ratio of momentum to velocity.

So we realize that really we are dealing with the same concept adapted to cyclical time, instead of lineal momentum the equation tell us that mass is cyclical, angular momentum, and instead of speed, the equation by substituting time-light for space-light, the motion dimension of S x Tƒ, by another S dimension, we fully grasp the meaning of mass, not just ‘define it’ with an incomprehensible ratio. Now it is clear that we are talking of density of ‘h-plancktons’ in light space-time, the membrane that sustains galaxies.

Those regions of maximal density are more difficult to move. Why? If we have grasped the concept of motion as reproduction of form over the light space-time membrane, we could say that the wave of mass (density of plancktons) as it displaces: reproduces: imprints the ‘light’ light space-time takes a longer time to do the imprinting: V=Se x Tƒ, or in terms of Information, E x I. Thus in each replication of the mass in the next ‘adjacent’ region of light space-time, more time is spent replicating it and the wave slows down. Now of course, a light wave has no difficulty to replicate so it is the maximal speed – it is light spacetime itself becoming ‘evident’ to the observer, no longer as pure space dimensions but as motion. On the other extreme the black hole, which is pure cyclical c-speed angular momentum, does NOT really move. It becomes a zero point around which light space-time will move.

Another way to consider this of the multiple perspectives allowed by T.Œ is the fact that a cycle repeats itself by returning to its original point. So the light wave never closes and so it constantly moves ahead, lineally. An angular momentum closes and so its motion stays in the same point and the faster it rotates the more difficult is to move it forwards.

All those are analogous concepts, which take the 3 different Se<ST>Tƒ, or in an spherical system, the 3 different Se (membrane) >ST (cytoplasm) > Tƒ (nuclei) perspectives (we use the cell structure as homologous to all spherical organisms). The membrane perspective tells us it is a cyclical closed motion which does not move along an X-coordinates; the Cytoplasm perspective tells us that its planckton must be replicated in the adjacent region of the lineal motion and that takes time. Finally the o-point or whole view, ‘gravitational center of mass’, in its connection with the lower-higher ∆±3 gravitational plane/field tries to maintain its point in the ‘tensor of mass energy’ of the gravitational field unchanged.

In transversal light waves none of those 3 components exist to stop the wave.

__ST: Motion__, it follows under the lineal inertial principle, is the steady state, reproductive repetitive displacement of the wave or cyclical vortex, on the ‘higher plane’ of gravitational space-time, due to its:

Se: __Force__, on the other hand, accelerates bodies, which is to say, they change the state of motion of bodies to which they are applied, increasing its entropy-energy. And we can consider the force of an entire field, which acts on wave-mechanics or particles ‘rising the U+1 energy-entropy-motion of the being’, according to 5D metric: Se (∆+1) > Se (∆)

Why then the system does NOT accelerate constantly. Here is where, the concept of inertia makes sense. Let us recall: “Mass is a measure of the tendency of a body to resist changes in its state of motion”. Thus while the Se- force should merely accelerate the Tƒ-mass, a balance between both CALLED LINEAL INERTIA, ACTS, according to the general law: Se≤ST≥Tƒ, whereas as always the ‘Inverse Complementarity’ of the Space-time parameters (remember, SexTf =K, Se=K/Tƒ is the fundamental law of 5D metric), the accelerated Se, and decelerating Tƒ (vortex that accelerates inwards, hence offers resists lineal displacement) balance into a steady state lineal motion and a steady state gravitational clock.

Thus the normal state of a being is to have an inverse accelerated ‘future’ clock of time called mass, a steady state , ‘present’ lineal motion called speed, and an entropic ‘past’ field, the nested U-3 plane of force of the higher U+3 Mass field (earth’s center, Sun, or galaxy black hole, depending on what detailed system we study).

The interplay of these effects is the principal theme of classical mechanics.

Let us go then deeper in its analysis.

**The simplest non-lineal 5D metric representations.**

Now as a rule, in the same manner the graph we choose encodes when simpler the ultimate function of the system, the type of curve we use to represent a function will also tell us a lot of the specific variation of the generator event/system we are describing. Let us put some examples beyond the lineal function.

- Hyperbolas representing 5D metric.

As we get into more complex, ‘full representations’ of the Generator, S, st, t equation or the 5D metric of the system, it is necessary to make use of nonlinear functional dependence.

Let us recall for example the law of Boyle-Mariotte, so often quoted in this blog for its sheer simplicity, proper of the key metric equations of ∆-scales (reason of the simplicity of physical equations, but as Einstein said not ‘that simpler’ – referring to lineal obsession):

Here the magnitudes p(T) and ν (S) are inversely proportional.

The graph of such a relation represents a hyperbola, the best representation for Metric 5D equations and S/T inverted graphs.

(The physical law of Boyle-Mariotte corresponds actually to the case that p and υ are positive; it represents a branch of the hyperbola lying in the first quadrant. We shall not yet study in depth the meaning of inverse negative numbers and complex graphs, will be just referred when used in physical equations, as they are the conundrum to solve the whys of quantum physics, ill-nterpretations)

Hyperbolic heat waves are also preferred, to unify the concepts of temperature and speed in relativistic thermodynamics:

ST-Oscillatory systems represented by hyperbolic trigonometric functions are in that sense the canonical equations for physical systems in motion around a present balanced point of equilibrium S=t:

In the graph the 3 subspecies of cyclical motions, Tiƒ: rotary motions, ST: wave motions and S: harmonic motions. WE CAN THEREFORE establish the Generator Equation of Periodic motions:

*Γ. Spe (Harmonic motions in one dimension) < St-wave motions in 3 dimensions > Tiƒ: circular motions in 2 dimensions.*

Now, when we dealt with operandi in physics, we remarked that *Trigonometric functions are the essential operandi of Time-dominant periodic motions, Integrals and derivatives of ∆-dominant planes of parts and wholes, and polynomials of social growth between ∆-planes. So we must deal with trigonometric functions to study periodic motion.*

It follows that wave body motions are the dimensional sum of the other two motions and the more complex ones, but all of them are closely related as varieties of the generator of periodic motions, that is, the whole range of potential world cycles of the physical Universe.

The existence of 3 subspecies of cyclical motions according to the ternary principle gives us a seemingly lineal harmonic motion, a cyclical motion and a wave motion, which combines both and hence extends and reproduces beyond the finite domain of SHM and CM. So SHM, CM, WM are 3 different yet closely related, Ω-motions in time.

The general class of oscillatory processes includes periodic motions, which are usually described by the familiar trigonometric functions. For example, if we extend a hanging spring from its position of equilibrium, then, so long as we stay within the elastic limits of the spring, the point A will perform vertical oscillations which are quite accurately expressed by the law

where x is the displacement of the point A from its position of equilibrium, t is the time, and the numbers a, p and α are certain constants determined by the material, the dimensions, and the initial extension of the spring.

**Polar, Complex tiƒ-unctions**

It follows obviously that Tiƒ time processes are better represented by polar, cyclical functions both in the Cartesian and specially the Complex domain.

Functions represented through the ∆-discontinuities between domains.

Finally to exhaust the main ∆st variations, functions that cross discontinuities might have huge discontinuous regions without value, or sudden changes of function, as *the jump between scales truly changes the space-time quanta, as we shall see in the analysis of energy functions in different domains (E∆-1≈ hv; E∆≈ knT; E∆+1≈1/2 mv²). So goes for process which jump ‘states’=ages o**f time.*

And so we talk of changes of quality in the function, as it happens in thermodynamics between the gas-young entropic, liquid, balanced and 3rd age, informative solid states.

In such cases we should keep in mind that a function may be defined in various domains by various formulas, determined by the circumstances of the case. For example, the relation Q = f(t) between the temperature t of a gram of liquid water (vs. solid ice) and the quantity of heat Q in it, as t varies between –10° and + 10°, is a completely determined function which it is difficult to express in a single formula, but it is easy to represent this function by two formulas. Since the specific heat of ice is equal to 0.5 and that of water is equal to 1, this function, if we agree that Q = 0 at –10°. is represented by the formula:

as t varies in the interval and by another formula

as t varies in the interval . For t = 0 this function is indefinite or multiple-valued; for convenience, we may agree that at t = 0 it takes some well-defined value, for example f(0) = 45. So the graph of the function Q = f(t) is clearly discontinuous as we change from T-solid, cold to st-liquid states.

We have introduced many examples of physical ∆st functions given by formulas and the reasons why possibility of representing a function by means of formulas is extremely important from the mathematical point of view, since such formulas provide very favorable conditions for investigating the properties of the functions by mathematical methods.

But one must not think that a formula is the only method of defining a function.

*As we said Algebra and numbers are just the time perspective symmetric to geometry and space. So both methods are valid, even though the synoptic nature of Algebra and its capacity to introduce the whole range of ∆st elements, makes it more flexible.*

But for many functions, specially thoe related to spatial locomotions, the symmetry allows to use the spatial graph of the function, which gives a visual geometric picture of it. For example:

To record variation of the temperature of the air during the course of 24 hours, meteorological stations make use of an instrument called the thermograph. A thermograph consists of a drum rotated about its axis by a clockwork mechanism, and of a curved brass framework that is extremely sensitive to changes of temperature. As a result, a pen fastened to the framework by a system of levers rises with rising temperature; and conversely, a fall in the temperature lowers the pen. On the drum is wound a ribbon of graph paper, on which the pen draws a continuous line, forming the graph of the function T = f(t), which expresses the interdependence of the time and the temperature of the air. From this graph we may determine, without calculation, the value of the temperature at any moment of time t.

This example shows that a graph in itself determines a function independently of whether the function is given by a formula or not.

And vice versa, mathematicians proved the following important ST-SYMMETRY: Every continuous graph can be represented by a formula, or, as it is still customary to say, by an analytic expression. This statement is also true for many discontinuous graphs.

We remark that the truth of this statement, which is of great theoretical importance, was completely realized in mathematics only in the middle of the past century. Up to that time mathematicians understood by the term “function” only an analytic expression (formula). But they were under the mistaken impression that many discontinuous graphs did not correspond to any analytic expression, since they assumed that if a function was given by a formula, then its graph must possess certain particularly desirable properties in comparison with the other graphs.

But in the 19th century, it was discovered that every continuous graph may be represented by a more or less complicated formula, IN THE same manner that every lineal function is ultimately a step of a larger world cycle, since all is ultimately time-like and space just a present slice of the whole of time.

Thus a more flexible definition was given for the concept of a function. By this definition a variable y is called a function of a variable x if there exists a rule whereby to every value of x in the domain of definition of the function there corresponds a completely determined value y, independent of the way in which this rule is given: by a T-formula, an S- graph, a discrete discontinuous number table or in any other way.

And this again is a natural rule for all stiences, which have evolved always from simple, geometric continuous lineal parameters and theorems to include cyclical elements (so in physics from lineal inertia, latter they learned that cyclical inertia orbits of atoms never stop) and finally ∆-scales and discrete, discontinuous values, *where only the closing point of the world cycle or frequency repetition is relevant (or the singularity parameter that seeds with information the whole, etc – as often happen in nature, where in biological palingenesis, the 3 billion years of evolution shrink to the most efficient steps and so in 9 months human repeat the shrunk process)*.

Finally, in this basic introduction, to the simplest key functions of mathematical physics and its correspondence with GST, We should notice that the graph of a function which for all values of x satisfies the relation:

is antisymmetric with respect to the origin of coordinates (x-spacetime like axis).

While the graph is symmetric with respect to the y-time-like axis and in the case:

We must interpret for the most general concept the function ƒ( -1), any function of negative value; being the most important, the simplest one, for x=1, √-1.

Which has in the real world two solutions: √1 and -√1, which gives to i a real dual value. If the two elements are inverse, – √1 that can cancel each other

A CONCEPT which turned out to be a key one in quantum physics, to classify particles as fermions (particles, which can not occupy the space, hence exist in a single ∆-plane) and bosons (wave-like particles which can occupy the same space in different scales of the fifth dimension):

The rule is simple: 2fermions have ‘inverse’ orientations in the fifth dimension of space-time as they cancel each other. 2 bosons have the same orientation and when coupled together start a process of §ocial growth, as the graph in the right side shows. They grow till they can emerge in an ∆+1 scale, collapsing its wave. Thus they can form wave trains, with identical orientation, becoming ST-herds, adding its present energy to create the wave (when perceived as having the same speed-distance), or collapsing into a denser frequency wave, faster in its space-time energy (when perceived as having the same time cycle).

Thus we can extract the different properties of waves, which are parts of a social herd of the same direction, collaborating in its social evolution by virtue of having the same function regardless of position in space, and those of particles, which are a bit pricky and will annihilate each other when having inverse arrows on the fifth dimension (antisymmetric functions), such as positive and negative charge, which symmetric bosons lack.

Indeed, with this simple insight you can immediately solve this long puzzle of quantum physics and relate the 2 type of particles with its ST, T-Function.

Let us then for appetiser solve another conundrum of quantum physics, which so seemingly ‘elementary school’ notions of the wonderful ∆st universe ‘relatively simple and not malicious’ Einstein…

** **

**Conservation laws its meaning.**

Although Newton’s laws focus attention on force and mass, given its pedestrian ‘definition’, they have not resisted further advances on their analysis by modern physics.

Yet three other quantities which were better defined, take on special importance because their total amount never changes.

These three quantities are energy, (linear) momentum, and angular momentum. Any one of these can be shifted from one body or system of bodies to another.

Thus angular momentum, Tƒ and lineal momentum, Se, conserve themselves. They are the equivalent to ‘force’ and ‘mass’, with the addition of the Active magnitude:

Mv and rmv, or p and rp, thus again we observe that ST (v) x Tƒ (m) is conserved in one dimensional force, and when we ad R, the ‘force-distance’ from the center of the dual ‘rotary force’ or 2-dimensional, both are conserved. We thus talk of the conservation of forces AND the active magnitude together, an obvious platitude on 5D metric (SpexTiƒ=K ) and for 2 systems, the Œ center point and œ, moving point or momentum, of the conservation of their Se parameter (radius) and Tƒ combined parameter, P.

It is easy to understand this concept in terms of the internal structure of an accelerated Tƒ, clock of time, which is really what the angular momentum expresses, a vortex of time, Vo x Ro =K. Whereas as we come closer diminishing m, we increase the speed of the system. Thus angular momentum TRULY DEFINES THE inner structure of any Tƒ, accelerated ‘future’ vortex of time, and for that reason has multiple applications. While lineal inertia, has been analyzed previously, and defines the balance between a particle, Tƒ, and its accelerated field of a larger ‘scale’, hence apparently MORE STRAIGHT, but ULTIMATELY A LINEAL STEP OF A CYCLE (indeed the galaxy is a vortex, the sun is one and the earth another).

We discuss those principles on the general article (∆±3). So we do also with nergy conservation.

It is thus not remarkable that, although Newton’s laws are no longer considered to be fundamental, nor even exactly correct because of the confusion on the meaning of force and mass (they are correct but not fine tuned as Einstein, a theme we shall soon discus), the three conservation laws derived from Newton’s laws—the conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum—remain exactly true even in quantum mechanics and relativity. Since they ARE basic translations to U1<∆o systems of the laws of the 5^{th} dimension.

Now of course, a normal physicist will associate them (Noether’s theorem) to the isomorphism of space and isomorphism of time. That is how physics deduce them. And indeed, it shows really what we mean: lineal momentum implies the conservation of the total res extensa or space of the Universe, and its isomorphic laws, and angular momentum, of the conservation of the total past to future (one angular momentum direction) and future to past (the other direction) of the Universe.

They are proofs of the immortality and stability of the 3 ‘scales’ TOGETHER, not individually AS THEY REQUIRED TO CONSIDER TRANSFERS BETWEEN THE 3 SCALES. Hence there are ‘neutrinos particles’ which we do not see belonging to the U-3 gravitational plane (basically the free condensation of gravitational strings, equivalent to photons, we call ‘Plancktons’ he free condensation in the U-2 light space-time of our membrane), which carry away some angular momentum from our world (spin).

This is important. While a physicists will have enough with the deduction of those principles from the isomorphism of space and time, we add knowledge and perspective, as it becomes obvious that cyclical time is conserved by angular momentum and lineal entropy Se, by lineal inertia. And BOTH combine and interact together, into ST, waves.

Let us then briefly retake the theme of Energy, which is the ‘integral of momentum’.

Hence according to the general law, ∫S=to, explained in the central post, which defines ‘present space’ as a slice of the total time flow function, (an essential law), Energy is a ‘larger, longer, temporal, measure’ of the entire ‘potential’ future capacity of the system to develop its momentum and actions of shorter time steps-span on the lower relative S-level.

Now this again a physicist will tell you is due to the 4-vector structure of mathematical physics, were Energy plays the role of time, and momentum the role of space. Indeed. The why is now clear.

In addition, energy may change form while associated with a single system, appearing as kinetic energy, the energy of motion; potential energy, the energy of position; heat, or internal energy, associated with the random motions of the atoms or molecules composing any real body; or any combination of the three.

This merely means that ‘energy as the total motion of the system’ can have its lineal form|-Energy or kinetic energy, the equivalent of lineal time, its positional, fixed cyclical form, as mass or potential energy, or cyclical time, and it can exist and be exchanged between the 3 scales of the Universe; that is ‘mass=energy’ or U1 energy, heat or internal energy, ∆o energy on the thermodynamic scale and as we diminish energy when we go to lower scales, ‘quantum energy’, E=hƒ, or planckton energy, which feeds the upper scales, that could care less for the ‘sum over stories’ of the planckton, they just eat it to become a big particle (-;

Thus, the total energy, momentum, and angular momentum in the universe never changes. Since time and space are in its totality of the 3 scales we perceive, conserved.

The Hamiltonian, H, expresses those relationships in classical mechanics. If the constraints in the problem do not depend explicitly on time, then it may be shown that *H* = *T* + *V*, where *T* is the kinetic energy and *V* is the potential energy of the system—i.e., the Hamiltonian is equal to the total energy of the system. Furthermore, if the problem is isotropic (*H* does not depend on direction in space) and homogeneous (*H* does not change with uniform translation in space), then Hamilton’s equations immediately yield the laws of conservation of angular momentum and linear momentum, respectively, which are the derivatives, hence ‘instant moments’ of the total to time; i. e.. the cyclical time related to potential energy and the lineal time, related to kinetic energy.

** 3 AGES OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS**

** **Mathematics is an experimental language, whose laws postulates, 3 sub disciplines and real units, numbers & points ARE based as a mirror of reality in the laws of Space (geometry and its points), Time (algebra and its numbers) and the scalar structure of the Universe (analysis).

**We shall introduce here the connection between the ‘2nd scale’ of pure formal language (after GST), MATHEMATICS, and the simplest forms (by lack of perception or anthropomorphic reductionism), physical systems, in the chain of causal beings:**

*∆±i: GST LAWS -> ∆º: illogic mathematical forms -> ∆º±i: Physical laws.*

That is, the laws of space-time in all its scales are the origin of the mathematical language of the human and we imagine many other singularity minds of the Universe that resumes those laws in a synoptic Tiƒ point of information; and then humans mixing both, the ∆º mind of mathematics and the ∆±i experimental evidence of physics, extract from them physical laws.

So this section will remain in a very elemental level, a guidance for future researchers on that equation, which is at best broken into small parts, unconnected, as the beauty of the previous equation is that in fact is more like a cycle for human researchers – that is physical laws can also be used given its extension and wide application to extract further space-time laws, and viceversa Gst LAWS, GIVEN the fact they re closely related to space-time processes, can be used to improve and correct the errors of our space-time continous models of physics.

By no means this is an exhaustive but merely an introductory post which is intended to be a future guidance on how to interpret in physical equations in terms of ∆ºst elements the mathematical equations when describing ‘realist’ physical systems.

*And yet so little so simple will still r=evolve completely your view of the physical world when we ad to mathematical physics all the…*

**∆ºST perspectives.**

As all other stiences, including the languages used to describe them, we can break down, in the ∆•ST elements of all beings. so happens with mathematical physics, whose generator as usual started in a young ‘spatial age’ of geometric physics (Greek age->Kepler->Galileo), and then turned to the use of temporal, algebraic equations, to finally blossom with the understanding of ∆-scales with the use of analysis, *which became the queen of all mathematical physics*.

And so when we reduce physics to mathematics a T.Œ REALLY just needs to explain in ∆•st terms the meaning of those equations.

Mathematical physics is not though equivalent to ‘mathematics’.

As Einstein put to Poincare: ‘I know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’.

Why this discrepancy, today lost to many physicists?

To start with *all languages are inflationary, as they belong to the ‘informative, min. Spe x Max. Tiƒ’ side of 5D metric. So paradoxically there is more information and potential futures in an ‘isolated’ Tiƒ, ∆-i language than in the ∆-being it portrays: ∑tiƒ> ∑ (Spe≈tif).*

So all the potential ‘mathematical relationships of physical ∆•ST systems; are less than all the inner creations of mathematics as a syntax, which includes fictions (for a general analysis of inflation in languages, from money, inflationary in economics, to fictions of verbal thought to mathematical fictions and how to detect them, see when posted the general articles on syntax vs. semantics and universal grammar).

Thus the *limiting factors of real mathematics, caused in an inflationary language of information (mathematics) by the existence of an opposite arrow, entropy that erases ‘it’ (informative time) in the real world. and by the search therefore of a point of balance and equilibrium, S≈T, which all systems seek automatically in order to survive.*

So the limits of mathematics to become real physics are ‘simplification by entropy and balance’; which means we are always working around some points of equilibrium of the form S=T; or given the fact humans ignore this constant fractal ‘balance’ happen in infinite events around us, in the form F(s) – G(T) =0, either observed in a single moment by derivating it, or in a whole world cycle by integrating it.

And so those are the fundamental forms of physics; and hence knowing what an F(S) field of entropy is and a G(T) particle of information amounts to, we can enlighten a bit more those equations by writing them as balances, (S=T instead of S-T=0).

Let us then consider the S-geometric ‘1st age of mathematical physics’, its ‘algebraic age’ of operandi, and its age of ∆nalysis.

As usual in those texts, to ease my workload in a race against time to vomit 30 years of ‘single point research’, we will use classic texts which are easy to understand but have enough depth of meaning to introduce the main themes of the subject, and then slowly *illustrate and merge them with the new insights and solutions provided by GST; of late in this method I try to put the insights in blue. *The texts used always in mathematical physics are 3 little encyclopaedias, which i enjoyed deeply in my youth: the 3 volumes of Feynman’s lectures & Aleksandrov’s maths, and for the more complex 4th line, Landau’s encyclopaedia of physics in 11 volumes.

In that regard of course the pedantic scholar and student will find most of this post on ‘things he thinks he knows’ rather elemental (not so the 4th line if we come to write it in my lifetime) but he will miss the point of GST:

*To show the simplicity of the Universe, and its isomorphic nature, which departs from the 4 sets of basic laws of ∆ûst of space-time:*

*The ∆-scalar simplex structure of the 5th dimension and the search for wholeness of all its parts, *

*ST: the bidimensional, holographic principle of ST systems and its balances between entropy and form.*

*Γ: the ternary arrows of time and its symmetries with the 3 topologies of space.*

*Œ: The eternity of its repetitive but finite supœrganisms and world cycles…*

*And the ternary Universal grammar of all languages that mirror the Universe, including mathematical physics.*

And for that TO BE CLEAR, we need to start with the simplest discoveries of physics, which were very clearly obeying those laws, namely the discovery of the bidimensional geometric nature of planetary orbits, and forces…

BUT to prove THAT first we need to understand how entropy and information together create a space-time cycle of energy. That is, as mathematics is an experimental language, we need to know what it ‘experiences’ – no more no less than the fundamental laws of space-time.

So let us explain you with 3 arrows of time, entropy and information and its infinite, energetic combinations, how the Universe truly works.

Further on as mathematics and physics have been married throughout history and both have been distorted by 2 errors:

- Entropy only theories of physics, which translated into single time arrows.
- The paradox of the ego that makes
*mathematicians and physicists to change the order of causality and think that ‘mathematics comes first’ before space and time and reality.*

We will have to discuss to fully grasp the foundations of mathematics the ‘ego paradoxes and worldly religion of physicists’ to make entropic weapons, to fully grasp how and when the foundations of mathematics *LOST ITS TRACK and its experimental nature in the work of Hilbert and the quantum physicists that following his musings on mathematics as the language that creates reality, believed that mathematics was reality itself.*

## II. MATHEMATICS ‘ONLY’ AS A LANGUAGE OF GST.

All this said of course, mathematics is with words and images, the three dominant, spatial, temporal and space-time languages of the human mind and as such they are very good mirrors of reality. To the point that maths, the less understood by man (which is a verbal, visual I=eye>wor(l)d basically), as it seems to be a better language for ‘digital machines’, natural to them; seems so often magic, when it reflects reality.

It is in that sense part, its richness as a mirror, part the human limits of thought what makes math so ill-understood and revered. So we shall introduce a few concepts of that ‘mirror-reflection’ before we apply them to mathematical physics.

… STARTING from what Einstein considered the ‘initial elements’ of reality (of the mirroreality of mathematics we would say). Its universa constants.

**e, p(h)i.**

*In graph, the 3 fundamental mathematical and physical constants of Nature*

*We shall depart from their ‘unification’ to explain how they mirror Universal creation of reality departing from ‘perfect ratios of entropy and information’. As such G and Q can be easily unified as two space time vortices of 2 scales of nature, the quantum and gravitational scale, showing the ratios between distance/speed/lineal space and time cycles/curvatures.*

*While the 3 main constants of mathematics are directly related to the 3 ages that generate space-time:*

*pi, relates the transformation of a spatial field of entropy into a vortex of temporal information: 3 x ( Spe) > ∏ Tiƒ.**e the constant of the only function, which is a derivative of itself, eª represents the fundamental function of reproduction and growth of any system, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step. Or in terms of 3: e+e/10=3, where 10 is the commonest growth ‘finitesimal’ as 10, is the simplest ‘whole organism’, with 3 x 3 ‘corners’ that represent the 3 arrows of time and a 10th central unit, the mind that ‘transcends’ as the 1 of a higher social scale.*- Phi, the golden ratio is essentially the demising ratio that relates the entropic ‘length’ and ‘informative’ height of a bidimensional ‘page of information

phi thus is the number of the palingenesis, or inner distribution of growth, during the first age of the being, above 1; e is the number of scalar growth, above 2 : e+e/10= 3…

And Pi, above 3, is the number that converts entropy into information, (Poincare’s conjeture).

And of course pi and e are ever present, around 3. Of its many definitions the one mathematicians ignore of e, is the more proper one, e+ e/10 = 3, a unit of growth of the perfect game of decametric scales of social numbers, which is a good way to introduce…

**The power of first principles: mathematical constants as a proof of dark matter.**

How important those simplest constants are can be seen considering some simple solutions of mathematical physics, which have cost enormous experimental effort in classic physics. We often bring here the two of cosmology – the meaning and proportion of dark matter, and the meaning and value of the G constant of gravitation, both only obtained with experimental evidence, but which are rather trivial theoretical results from GST.

So let us consider one of those conundrums. What is dark matter? We shall see *how a simple thought experiment reveals as the Greeks and Einsteins always knew much more than machines of huge cost, for the cheap price of a few words and a kilo of old grey healthy matter. Indeed, it took millions of $ to calculate the dark matter of the Universe. Another trivial margin (:*

How simple indeed can be the answer to all the great questions?

Extremely simple as 3 is really a small number and the numbers around it, suffice to explain the 3 ages of life.

So all the important numbers of science turn around 1, 2 and 3, which as Einstein put it would have to be ‘the final essential constants that reflect best the game of existence’ :

Yet pi is not perfect. And if we were to consider the real pi of nature, as all ‘membranes’ do have ‘holes’ through which parallels of entropy and information cross, we would say that a membrane is π=3+0.14 apertures, through which the singularity mind in the center can see behind the membrane, the outer world. So we have always a 96% of dark matter, which allows us to see through: π-3/π

How much of dark matter there is? We know is 96% and we see only 4%. Again this took enormous effort of machines to measure it, but it is another ‘proof on the margin’, once you understand properly maths. We said that pi is NOT perfect. In fact, the closure of pi is 3 lineal parts that become a closed topology. It is the hexagonal pi (perimeter 3, radius 1) the strongest polygon; and that of the most curved gravitational space in relativity. But if we consider that 3 diameters of entropy create a circle, then there are 0.14 potential windows to see from its center, surrounded by the dark matter halo.

This means: π-3/3=4% of reality is WHAT we see. And indeed 96% of reality is invisible dark matter and energy, ‘screened’ by the halo. We are *inside a relative gravitational **gala cell and the homunculus should know his position in the Universe, which likely if we could see it all would look much more as a local organism till the horizon beyond we cannot even see that 4%.*

**NUMBERS**.

Now, once we have solved a simple example with the ‘first layer of mathematical reality’, its Universal constants, we can give a try to the second layer, ‘numbers’. You might of course consider that constants are ratios of numbers, and they are. So what are numbers?

The answer is numbers are ‘the sequential, temporal view of points, the simultaneous spatial view’. So numbers and points are the time-space species of mathematics, its foundational elements (NOT sets, categories or any other axiomatic imaginary arrogant mind-madness of human selfie mathematicians, indeed Cantor ended in a madhouse, but before converted mathematics in a mad-science with its ‘sets’ – the mind category that substituted the real ‘beings’ experimentally sound, ‘fractal points’ with inner volume (∆º) and its equivalent sequential elements in time, numbers.

This of course, is just the start, to build complex space-time systems in several dimensions, which polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimension. And we do have analysis which does the same exploration of parts and wholes in a more sophisticated way. But all *those functions will ultimately be mirrors of the 3 elements of all languages that reflect the 3 space-time elements of the Universe: *

F(s) < Operandi/ST-action > G (T)

Reason why, and it is astounding we have to stay this, mathematics works so well as a mirror of so many systems, due to its capacity to carry so much detailed information about their spatial entropy and temporal information, and the operandi/actions that combine them. But alas, Mr. Hilbert changed all this for ‘his mind images’ as he couldn’t figure out the fractal points of Lobacjevski and he joined forces with Mr. Cantor’s paradoxes and paradises of ‘sets’ – another mind construct to substitute the number. And so they founded the axiomatic method – which of course Godel, Einstein’s best friend proved wrong, as Broglie and then Bohm, Einstein’s favourite student did with the Copenhagen ego. Do you think mathematicians who had entered their own ‘godlike’ paradise, as the only ‘language’ which existed and proved within itself (in its imaginary sets and points with no breath) cared?

No, they just started a runaway train of ever more complicated distortions of the beautiful mirror of geometric points, social numbers and its organic functions, as Copenhagen did, to make it all *so complex nobody could understand, and alas! they could dismiss forever since any criticism as experts into the language of God, like priests talking latin, Allah talking arab, and bankers issuing go(l)d in toxic derivatives nobody understood. *

This is the trick: to make the language inflationary, multiplying its ‘ptolemaic epicycles’ to pass as an expert of something you no longer understand or refer to reality.

It is then evident that fractal Non-E *points in space and numbers in time are the ‘real’ units of mathematics, which refer to the real elements of the Universe; not sets and imaginary points, neither physical theories based in inflationary distortions of the mathematical reality. *

Then instead of GOING up in complexity, we can go down in simplicity to the real Universe of space points and temporal numbers, and show that the structure of ‘social numbers’ the minimal units of temporal algebra, *have the properties of discontinuous time cycles, similar but not equal to the continuous, simultaneous space surfaces, and keep illuminating the world with mathematics. For example, *the first, oldest simplest conundrum we notice when we realise points are continuous space and numbers discontinuous time is the oldest paradox of maths: the explanation of why in geometry pi & √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ its perfect closure as numbers are discontinuous, so *all algebraic formulae of √2 miss a ±1; and all approximations to π, are slightly above or below.*

**Inflationary languages**

Hopefully the examples will make you realise the problem of mathematical physics and its ego paradoxes.

Again languages do follow those 3 ages also, which explain the problem of mathematical physics today: The whole system of mathematics today has entered a ptolemaic, informative 3rd age with the axiomatic method, of inward degradation as OLD MEN have too MANY WRINKLES OF FORM, and do NOT have the classic beauty of ‘simplicity that is genius’ (Vinci).

So THE fundamental RESPONSE I have always gotten from any SCHOLAR of its 3rd age of inflationary information is ‘it is too simple’. None understand that Ockham, economicity is truth, ‘the universe is simple and not malicious and so LANGUAGES ARE INFLATIONARY IN INFORMATION WHEN THEY BECOME FICTIONS, UNREAL, MULTIPLYING ITS FALSE CONTENT, AND THIS HAPPENS in all languages, when they STOP CHECKING REALITY. But the scholar old man, THINKS it is interesting to live in a FICTIONAL WORLD.

There is now inflationary money as the financial system got corrupted; inflationary fiction in verbal thought, since money substituted it as the language of reality (Quixote the first novel was written when the first company was founded). There is inflationary mathematical excessive information since Hilbert and Cantor disconnected its fundamental units, points and numbers from reality. And inflationary physics since Bohr and Gamow invented the science as a product of the mind and its maths. But the scholar in the same manner it said to Copernicus that his work was false because it was too simple and Hilbert said to Einstein that his maths were so simple that a student could do them, BECOMES AN expert on ‘imaginary linguistic distorted mirror information, because he abandons reality.

And so when you try to explain him the simplicity of it all, he gets offended and tells you like vatican priests to copernicus, Hilbert to Einstein and any physicist to those who introduce information and energy as two arrows of time that simplify the impossible task of explaining all with entropy: it is too simple, we like baroque fictions, simple reality bores us to death – we are far more than that, we are ‘experts’ in wrinkles and inflation.

*INFLATION is indeed the key way to convert wrong theory into something respectable, equivalent to the old age of Mr. Garcia, for whores buildings and religions.*

I have never believed anything which I didn’t understand. *But people’s mind works the other way around – they only believe what they don’t understand. And that is why* the entire simple, evident bullshit of quantum and big-bang physics explained here in its simplest terms has become so confuse.

The same happen for example with the racket of the issue of money the language of social power who controls the world and the American FED makes so complex to issue that the Americans *really believe the fact a few private banksters have hijacked their democracy issuing money and giving orders of work with them to their slavish population is ‘freedom’. *

Indeed, wall street invents a digital number called money for free, and for example, this week invented 20 billions and gave it to a crony friend, for a silly nilly crapcode repetitive algorithms, called snapchat, but if they want the minimum welfare they *must pay every penny with taxes. *The astounding racket of the cdo scam – over 2 trillions extorted in taxes – worked the same way: people in that country are so clueless about what money is and who invents it, they handled 2 trillions to bankers who just had ‘invented’ false mortgages, and sold it ‘twice’. Well, instead of going to jail, they *sold those mortgages a 3rd time to the people of America on exchange for 2 trillions, and people gave to them. *

Let us then apply the far more evolved concept of a Universe made of ‘systems’ with the 3 ‘space-time’ organs, a cyclical clock-like membrane that contains a body-wave of energy, self-centred in a singularity of information to the galaxy, to further understand the Witten hypothesis, and why it is so likely we become merely a strangelet particle in the halo of the galaxy.

Since the beauty of having a higher reality, that of space-time and its ternary parts is that we can now EXPLAIN IT ALL, not only in mathematical equations, which of course will offer us a lot of detail – more than any other human language, except direct visual images, but we can also put other linguistic mirrors, of which the most important is the organic, ternary topological structure of all systems, as discovered by Descartes, with its cyclical closed membrane, its informative mind-singularity and the vital space-time of energy between them.

So when we put together both arrows of time, we observe what we observe: REALITY AS IT IS.

**Duality or rather trinity, 5D and numbers.**

Now, we have a better mirror. Sorry the homunculus only has prizes, I do have the better mirror on my point-mind but homunculus does not want me to share, because I have told him his big mouth and big hands are going to kill us all, and he got sored. good luck.

This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.

It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.

Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).

*The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. *Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.

So when i took over the discipline of Duality at the world congress of systems sciences and information theory – the sciences which were found at the death of Einstein in the Macy’s congress precisely to follow in his path, and find dualist theories which offset the simplex entropy word of physicists – I told the people we should rename it TRINITY as entropy and information, yin and yang, are just the 2 starting elements to combine into infinite energy beings, whereas energy is precisely defined by a lineal motion of entropy tracing a closed path of information.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information. The simplicity and capacity to explain the Universe with the 3 proper arrows of time is in that sense a revolution unlike none has happened in science, since copernicus simplified the equations of Ptolemy putting the sun in the center.

The point is this: for a century now physicists have NOT made any huge inroads in the thoughts of god only the details because models made with an entropic single arrow of death are completely exhausted, as models with the Earth at its centres were exhausted by the time of Galileo.

So let us complete the ternary universe and show how it is reflected by mathematics.

**TRINITY: The life and death cycle.**

Yet man is a mirror of languages, so mathematics cannot reflect all its properties, neither all languages of man together, which ad maximal will create an encyclopaedia based in the principles of this web – which resolves its syntax – but far more extended in information and yet an infinitesimal of the whole Universe.

Since only the entire Universe has ALL the information about itself, which infinite finitesimal mirror-minds, monads in Leibniz’s jargon (another humble genius, massacred by the arrogant Newton) reflect with many languages, some of which we do NOT understand or see, as the gravitational language of information that guides the motions of black holes (‘the languages of god are infinite’ said Upanishads).

Now, once we know that ternary structure all becomes simple also in physics – from the unification equation of charges and masses, trivial in duality and 5D metric as they are both accelerated vortices of time of the quantum, microscopic and gravitational, macroscopic scale, to the 3 families of mass, trivial as they are the ternary ages of evolution of informative mass of the Universe, needed to construct the galaxy, to the meaning of dark matter, trivial as it is the halo of strangelets and other quark species of lumps, to why there is more particles than antiparticles, trivial as the antiparticle is the ‘entropic arrow of death’ of the particle and so there are as many particles and antiparticles, but BECAUSE THE ARROW OF LIFE IS DOMINANT and lasts much LONGER than the arrow of death, which is an instant of time.

So because death happens in an instant and life in a long period, as we do NOT see hardly any corpse and someone like Buddha, thought life particles were immortal, we do not see the instant of particles. Thus in duality the equation of death is also trivial: Min. Time-information (death moment) x Max. Space-entropy (explosion of information).

As in big-bangs and deaths that happen in an instant of time… (he, he, i like that word, trivial , to put down the homunculus ego ‘a lot’).

Ok, then you have here the development of the ages of life: Birth: Max. Information (seed of time) in a lower ∆-1 scale, which emerges in:

∆º: Youth (Max. entropy x Min. Information) < Maturity (information x entropy = energy) > 3rd age (Max. Information) and then dissolves back:

∆-1: Death = 0-time information x ∞ entropy.

*And this is the equation of any big bang that happens in no time, expands enormously space nd entropy because the big-bang IS the equation of death of physical matter. And that is what it will be for mankind. *

Yet as Kuhn explains this r=evolution of thought will take a long time to be understood as today sciences HAVE A PRIESTHOOD called mathematics, which is Ok if it had the proper experimental foundations.

But mathematics since Cantor and Hilbert is going through the informative 3RD BAROQUE, age of all language, which is INFLATIONARY, excessively filled with FORM, which does NO LONGER reflect reality.

** A fast review of the 3 ages of mathematics.**

As all other systems of reality the languages of the mind, including mathematics are generated by the symmetries of space, time and the 5th dimension; and each of those ‘sub-disciplines’, which mirror one of the 3 central elements of the Universe, can be subdivided further more in ternary ages of evolution, ternary parts/subdisciplines and will deal with ∆±1 elements, or scales – this being a feature to analyse in each sub discipline.

i.e. analysis will deal with ‘finitesimal parts’ (derivatives), integrals (its inverse), and equations comprising both in social scale.

We call the discipline i-logic mathematics because even though many scientists don’t fully realize, mathematics is a language with 2 sides, its causal logic postulates or ‘time events’ reflected in its operandi and its formal variables and algebraic structures.

But it is of a higher logic than the Aristotelian, Euclidean mathematics of current systems. Hence after A and E, ¬Æ becomes ‘i-logic’. Timespace sciences are of a logic higher than that of human beings. This means basically a key change in operandi, =, equality is substituted by ≈ and <≈>, similarity and ‘transformations’. E=Mc² does not mean mass is energy, but it can be transformed in energy. In this manner mathematics reflects often duality transformations of time into space into time: Sp<=>Tƒ.

As a result of this dynamic understanding most symmetries of 5D space-time can be represented by¬Æ i-logic mathematics. And once we translate the key concepts of geometry, algebra and analysis to fractal space, i-logic time and 5D structures, the classic theorems of mathematics will naturally flow into ‘meaning’, acquiring a realist purpose never more to be doubted.

And the subjective Hilbert-Cantor, Axiomatic-Set German-Jewish school of Idealist foundations of mathematics (‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, sets as the units of mathematics instead of fractal, organic Œ-points and its societies numbers) will go down the gutter. We shall though keep the astounding display of the laws of the Universe expressed in mathematical languages.

Then most laws of sciences will be general laws of relationships between space, time and 5D structures, relating the world cycles, symmetries in space-time and social processes of growth in 5D of the natural world.

For example, the classic F(x) ‹≈› G(y) equation tends to represent the initial and final state of a ‘form in space’ of a system after it has been transformed in cyclical time or through an emergence or dissolution in the 5th dimension by an ‹≈› operandi.

This is all what there is to mathematics: the transformations of a certain still picture or form in space, through a cyclical time revolution or a 5 D=evolution into another final state in space.

So the Generator Equation of mathematics as a language can be expressed as Sp (state ) <Present or 5ST actions > Tƒ state.

Another way to define mathematics though is through its 3 disciplines, which correspond to space=geometry, time=algebra and analysis=5D but as mathematics became more powerful as a tool to explore the interrelationships of space, time and the 5th dimension the 3 sub-disciplines merged into different mixtures. For example, Space mixed with time in topology (space with motion) and with analysis in calculus and with both in analytic geometry.

All in all the most obvious distinction of mathematics will be between the operandi, classified as time revolutions (a complete time cycle and its 3±Âges >≈> and 5 D>evolutions (the devolution or evolutionary arrows of the 5th dimension).

SO here we conclude the analysis of mathematics and philosophy of mathematical physics, and we shall in increasing degrees of complexity adopting a temporal ‘view’, introduce the main equations and laws of mathematical physics, relating them to both experience and language, remember – GST laws-> ∆º mathematical laws -> ∆º±i: mathematical physics.

## III. SPATIAL AGE OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.

In the origin, as all evolutionary mind mirrors human mathematical scientists working on the understanding of the simplest elements of reality, bidimensional space-time, entropy/information and tridimensional energy systems functions and forms. It was the age of greek bidimensional geometry, where almost every concept could be exp