Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$
- Non-Æ: 6th Isomorphism
- Species of physical, biological and social systems.
What are species? Its variations. Physiological networks and gender.
The Universe is about 3 type of Networks which gather entropy, energy and information for herds of similar beings that form organs attached to those networks. It follows that to classify beings we must consider the order of those networks, its hierarchy and relationships, which will give way to 3×2 combinatory variations by hierarchical order of species – those dominated by the informative or entropic or reproductive network.
This simple rule of 3 variations and 6 hierarchical orders are the origin of most species of all systems of nature. We study them in this post.
The answer is surprisingly simple, when we consider its main phyla, and the origin of this ‘Disomorphism’, which belongs to variations in the HIERARCHY between its ternary physiological networks. So above we express that dynamic order, as there are only 3 physiological networks that correspond to the 3 dominant elements of reality, Space, time and vital energy, or in terms of the generator, if we call:
$t – the Ðimotion of lineal potentials/limbs; ST, the iterative Ðimotion of body waves and §ð the Dimotion of informative particle/heads, the dominance of the 3 physiological networks that perceive information, move and reproduce the system will give us 6 main variations/phyla, which we shall show allow us to classify from the 6 topological types of languages that define the mind of cultures, to the 6 main phyla of animal in the different scales of reality, to the different species of particles; when combined with the second fundamental differentiation of reality, ‘gender’, that is, the dominance of informative or energetic parts in a simpler ‘dual system’ made of two components (body-head, particle-wave), whereas the limbic/potential is external to the system.
Species as super organisms.
The second fundamental truth we must learn about species is its Nature as super organisms of the higher scale of the individual, which is quite evident when we understand the ternary topology of the Universe, and how its lineal limbs, hyperbolic body waves and informative particle-heads evolve, towards higher information in 3 ages, and finally die into entropy, while its informative memorial leftovers leave a trace in the outer world. So happens with species that go through 3 ages that mimic the 3 ages of life in the upper ∆+1 plane of existence and then become extinct, or a few of them with maximal information evolve into a larger super organism (ant-hills, human beings) that become ‘a new plane of existence’ beyond the individual:
Species can be treated as super organisms, loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.
Since as information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle, the species that last longer are those who evolve further information, and can become a social super organism.
So species follow 3±∆i ages with its final social evolution into a new whole, communicated by the informative language evolved in its 3rd age or extinction in time. Let us consider in this introduction those 3±¡ ages of species, called Horizons:
The graph thus show that ALL species follow also the young, predator, reproductive radiation, and informative, height growth of the 3 ages of life, and then either they evolve further into social organisms (ants, bees, humans) and as wholes in a higher ∆+1 scale survive better, or they become extinct by a new generation.
The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.
+1: Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).
The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.
For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.
I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions
In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators
A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.
Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.
II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Sp x Tƒ. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.
III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. Tƒ: max. Evolutionary differentiation.
Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.
The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.
Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.
– (±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.
Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Sp: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.
– S=T: Diversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.
However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.
– Max. Tƒ: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.
Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Sp) which defines the organism.
Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.
So evolution is indeed limited by the most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: those 3 timespace motions/forms: lineal motion in space or ‘distance’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time clocks carrying its frequency ‘information’ and its space-time, wave-like, reproductive energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe (when we ad its scales), so they assembly forming all space-time beings.
So we talk in all ‘families of species’ of 6 basic differentiations IN SPACE:
Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$
AND 3±1 ages of social evolution or extinction in time.
The families are written by the dominance of one of the 3 ‘topological networks’=organs=dimotions of time§pace of the system are named generically as:
$t-∑∏-§ð: Top predator, first species to be born.
The predatory, feeding phyla belongs to the first type of species evolved. For example, the first fishes were flat carnivorous armed; the first carbohydrates long fats, lineal chains of amino acids. It is a species so successful that radiates in enormous numbers.
∑∏-$t-§ð; So next after its dexterity in hunting is proved we shall find a second phyla, master of reproduction. Such is the case of sharks, the final top predator fish, which are viviparous unlike other fishes, reaching its maximal perfection. So what this ‘first phyla’ lacks is a well developed brain, showing however that intelligence, when not used for social information is mostly baren, useless. In the example of the protein we also observe that it is a master of reproduction, having controlled ribosomes to that aim in cells that reproduce millions of them.
∑∏-§ð-t$, $t-§ð-∑∏. Yet as time moves on, ‘warping lineal spacetime into cyclical forms’, there is an increasing new value for the informative element, which keeps gathering pace till becoming the protagonist of the system. While the feeding elements that have reached its maximal possible evolution, since entropic systems are simple and reach easily a perfect form – the sword of the warrior has not evolved in 5000 years… and the ecosystem saturates and reproductive radiations are no longer that relevant – what matters is to be able to compete and keep the new born in the fight for existence… So we find intermediate stages, where the networks tend to balance each other in the ‘classic age of the phyla’…
§ð-∑∏-$t, §ð-$t-∑∏ Till finally those species where information has evolved further allow the gathering of individuals into social herds, which become a new whole. And that brings, a new plane of existence, and a new top predator ‘whole’ form in the ∆+1 plane that will re-start the whole diversification, from aminoacids to cells, from cells to multicelular organisms, to super organisms and global ecosystems…
So we introduce as the main innovation of Spatial topology in species the differentiation of them by its topological, ternary networks and organs.
DUALITY PARADOXES AND ITS DIFFERENT SPECIES: Sp≈Tƒ. GENDER DUALITY.
WE also notice that as there are black and white languages and ternary languages, we shall ALWAYS FIND simpler dualities that differentiate species as we find them in ternary systems. The main duality of species being that of gender. YET The dualities of Space-time are various as they all turn around the ilogic paradoxes studied previously, in the second Disomorphism. So in this post we shall study only the duality of gender.
For example in the human case women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.
Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:
Thus we define:
- Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
- Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.
This complex Sp<>Tƒ duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.
Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Sp≈Tƒ, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.Tƒ, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.
Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.
The same duality is clearer in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as in the next pictures.
Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.
The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>| female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.
Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the ∆-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.
I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the ∆-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.
I. ALL TYPE OF SPECIES.
The 3 forms of spatial entropy, temporal information and ST-body waves in diachronic analysis as time states.
It is clear that Informative Time, is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.
Those cyclical Tƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information. And its logic cycles guide the entire system, so Tƒ is indeed the arrow of future, Ft of the Universe, which arrives first to the future, perceives the paths of the system and so we can relate limbs/fields of space and lesser form to the past and heads/particles that guide them to the future; and the intermediate system of waves-bodies that reproduce, iterate, hence repeat in a dynamic present that seems not to change the system with the present.
This will be the second fundamental diachronic vision of the Fractal Generator which we shall expand a lot in the next paragraphs (the blog, and posts are obviously tailored as the Universe is with constant FRACTAL REPETITIONS OF THE SAME CONCEPTS, with increasing complexity and detail in the samples we bring):
Ps (Past-entropy) < ST (Present, hyperbolic space-time) >ƒt (future information):
Now we can see how the expanded, corrected mirror, where the aberration of putting the dimension of height in the wrong part (space) when it is a dimension of information and time ‘resolves’ so many puzzles.
The ‘time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height:
In the graph, we see how flat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, amphibia into tall dinosaurs, mammals into tall apes and machines into tall robots. Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and a first simple definition of the Universe, which we have seen to be a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into mass towards a central tall singularity is this: a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.
And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies. And so all is a fluctuation of Sp <=>Tƒ, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.
We shall call the fractal generator of time-space beings, or Timespace Generator Equation, or Function of Existence, T.Œ, (ab. Œ), this Generator Equation will freeze by effect of minds, into worlds that ‘are’ in themselves both perceptive, and willing to increase its perception, by feeding in more energy and reproducing its form. We call each of those T.Œ, or functions of homologic existence which can be spotted, when we see them at work creating cyclical existences as those of the graph, accelerating through the ages of life, an Œ-fractal point, monad, soul, atman, frame of reference, Non-Euclidean momentum, you name it. Each science will show a whole range of such T.Œs made to the image and likeness of the supreme T.Œ, God, mind of the Universe.
Species also bring variations on the same theme of aging which will become the different horizons and sub-species that ultimately will assemble themselves into a new larger super organism or plane of existence, through a process of evolution that includes both, variations in time and space morphologies and social gatherings in larger groups.
Some dual, creative analyses forgotten by AE sciences that we consider in ¬Æ ST Theory: the Universe as a spatial system, machines as evolutionary beings, and civilizations as organisms. The game of creation must be understood through its ‘dual symmetries’ and ternary networks that allowed its finite reproduction of fractal forms in the infinity of continuous space
The most satisfying function of existence is reproduction, the Generator Arrow, the maker of the game and all its species – the purest sensations of them all.
The Generator Feedback equation of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information is a reproducer, which embodies all the combinations of the game in itself, the creative algorithm of reality, which Touring once looked for with its simplest example a touring machine. But the creator potentially is more than a touring machine, it is what the touring machine observes, reality itself.
The rest of beings are just following the combinations of that grand design.
The active creator is limited by the parts of the whole that will assembly. So we shall call it with a more humble name, the assembler
With the syntactic combinations of the i-logic generator, the creator will always end repeating a form of finite time that had existed in ∞ space.
The proof that we are all repetitions is clear: space is infinite because it has not dark spaces, but it is a continuous number of closed and open topologies assembled in triangles, squares, hexagonal, polygonal and hexagonal, planes and spheres, with no darkness.
Information however is always limited and time always ends: it is a fluctuation of existence over that ∞ ‘—motions’.
All existences have possibly existed in the infinite fractal space of a finite number of times cycles.
We all will be assembled again as an i-logic form of space-time in some other self-repetitive fractal printed in the infinite ‘—motions’ of the trophic pyramid of existence that gave you birth.
Let us then operate the creator: Its simplest combinations will be complementary systems of ‘—motions’ and information that take advantage of the inverse properties of both:
The dualities of Creation.
In time the generator combines past, ‘—motions’ forms and future informations, generated by its universal, feedback cycles, and its arrows that imprint and create the chains of forms of present existence. Creation is structured by a series of dualities that merge creating an eternal, fluctuating present that appears and disappears as cyclical action-reaction systems cancel each other, making its total sum zero:
– Time and space have opposite morphologies and functions, which cancel each other:
– Informative, temporal singularities are convex, implosive and energetic membranes are concave, explosive. Thus a flat plane of temporal ‘—motions’ fluctuates into 2 virtual forms whose total value is null. For example, particles and antiparticles are born of a vacuum plane without form but they keep their inverse CPT parity. Thus the sum of its spatial form (P), its temporal arrows (T) and its dual, organic charge cancel.
– The duality of ‘—motions’ and information explains also sexual differentiation: females are specialized ‘time beings’ dominant in cyclical forms, memory, information, temporal verbs and perceptive languages. While males are specialized ‘‘—motions’ beings’ with bigger, lineal forms, dominant in spatial tasks. Yet both can be further differentiated into an informative cyclical head, and a lineal body. So, in graph 3.1 we draw a man with “temporal cycles” that represent his informative organs, the head and senses; and ‘—motions’ lines that represent the body and his members. Yet, despite the simplicity of that design, he is recognizable as a man.
– Duality causes the creation and reproduction of space-time fields through the process of palingenesis, by which a certain form of relative future, a father, emits a relative form of past, with lesser evolution, a seminal seed, that then evolves very fast towards the future, till becoming again a present form parallel to the father.
– Duality exists in biologic organisms evolved by the dual influence of macro-ecosystems and micro-genes.
– Duality is the cause of informative perception, as flows of spatial forces become transformed in a point of relative time or particle, in which they ‘merge’ into a ‘boson’, accumulative image of information that represents reality.
– Duality also applies to behavior: there are Darwinian acts between different beings that destroy each other vs. social, evolutionary acts between equal beings that evolve together, sharing ‘—motions’ and information through common networks. Thus all organic life ends up cancelled by a predator. It is a key duality as it responds to the 2 arrows of space-time, the arrow of symbiotic order, of information and the arrow of energetic ‘—motions’ of destruction defined by the 3rd postulate of illogic geometry.
– Finally Duality implies that all forms that evolve in time through 3 horizons, then organize in space those 3 horizons as the 3 regions of an i-point.
The number of events we can describe in all sciences departing from duality is enormous. Yet in as much as temporal information is dominant in living beings, illogic time is more important in biological and sociological sciences, explaining phenomena such as reproduction, perception, life and death, organic structures, etc. While, physical and cosmological particles can be described better with the use of Non-Euclidean, spatial geometry, as particles are dominant in spatial ‘—motions’. We will consider in the next chapters the most important biological applications of illogic time: the duality of Darwinian and symbiotic behavior; the way in which perception occurs; the concept of a top predator species, as information selects species with better brains; the palingenetic reproduction of biological forms which implies a dual travel in time back and forth from the future to the past…
But duality is only the beginning. Most systems evolve, self-combine and create finally a 3rd system, a reproductive one, becoming autonomous, without the need of ‘assemblers’ and ‘enzymes’. And then the game becomes richer in variations, because it becomes guided by ternary symmetries.
We understand those organic, self-reproductive systems according to the Ternary Principle studying the 3 temporal ages and functions of a ST field and then putting them together as the 3 geometric, organic, spatial regions of i- point. Since all ST field require 3 elements to exist: a Tƒ, informative element; an Es, energetic, spatial form, and an intermediate ‘present, simultaneous region’, dual flux of temporal ‘—motions’ that merges them into a whole. The result is an Sp-Tƒ rhythm of evolution and reproduction of forms in time that become latter reorganized as i-points in space, creating dual organic, real forms of temporal ‘—motions’. For example, the Universe first created fundamental particles, temporal quarks and spatial electrons that recombined into ST atoms; the body reproduces cells that latter evolve, becoming organs of ‘—motions’ and information, etc. Thus ST theory shows the complementarity between the ternary horizons of species that once have evolved energetic and informative particles interact creating an intermediate ST zone, shaping a new i- organism:
– Max. Sp: The external membrane and energetic network of the system that performs ‘—motions’ cycles, transforming information into ‘—motions’, appears first: it is the cell’s fat membrane, the stars of the galaxy, the endodermic cells of the future digestive systems….
-Max.Tƒ. Then it will appear the informative quanta of the future informative network and ‘brain’ of the system that perform informative cycles, transforming ‘—motions’ into information: they are the cells’ informative nucleotides, the black holes of the spiral galaxies, the brain.
– Sp x Tƒ: Finally the interaction of ‘—motions’ and informative systems creates an intermediate, reproductive region that combine ‘—motions’ and information: so protein membranes and nucleotide acids create the cell; stars and black holes create galaxies; the energetic endoderm and the informative ectoderm create the middle mesoderm region, each one the blue print of the future energetic, digestive, informative, nervous and blood, reproductive systems.
In formal terms we write the process as a decoupling of an initial Sp x Tƒ form that differentiates into a more energetic membrane (Max.Sp) and higher informative quanta (Max.Tƒ), that interact, creating the intermediate region, ST, shaping in this manner a new, ternary equation – the ultimate definition of any species. Since we are all self-repetitive MST field equations
The generator equation, Sp<ST>Tƒ, represents both: a temporal event between 2 relative ‘points’, an Œ-point with higher content of ‘—motions’ or relative past form, and an Œ-point with higher content of information or relative future form, that communicate implosive information (>) and explosive ‘—motions’ (<), through a wave of temporal ‘—motions’, <=>; creating a ternary, multicausal, simultaneous structure of spatial present.
Multi-functionality: 3 st-points functions. Ternary Principle:
Creation happens due to the ‘diversification’ of any Space-time field in 3 subspecies in space or 3 ages in time; Sp, ST, Tƒ.
It is the ternary principle once and again written in the book of Nature, caused by the fact that there are only 3 elementary forms in the Universe, ‘—motions’, information and a combination of both. Thus, events, species and space-time fields, both in time and space, have 3 elements: 3 ages, 3 horizons, 3 dimensions or 3 physiological networks, whose functions correspond to the arrow of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction that create the Universe. The Ternary principle is the origin of an evolutionary, impersonal plan of creation that diversifies species in all scales of reality into 3 forms, (Max. ΣSp, Max. Tƒ, ΣSp=Tƒ), from the 3 families of masses to 3 the types of Universes. It allows organizing all biological species in a tree of ternary horizons and differentiations of energetic, informative and balanced organisms, which co-exist in 3 st-scales of existence:
‘Any form can be subdivided ad eternal in new ternary forms.’
For example, the human body can be subdivided into 3 networks; then the digestive network can be subdivided into the stomach, liver and intestine system that can be subdivided into the colon, small, and large intestine, which can be subdivided into the left, top and right side, etc. The Ternary principle implies that the 3 spatial dimensions of any space-time field perform 3 temporal functions:
‘Any species, which is part of an ecosystem or an organism, maximizes its survival developing 3 functions as an energetic, reproductive and informative system for the higher scale’
I.e.: a cilia act as energetic limbs that move the cell, sensorial antennae that inform, and they evolved as centrioles that help to reproduce it. Hormones are also multifunctional.
And so on. This first rule of creation developed either in space as a topology of 4-dimensional reality with 3 elements, toroid ring, hyperbolic cycle and spherical plane, or in time as a game of ‘—motions’ that warps into information reproducing along the way, is your limit.
So the creator descends a notch more into self-appreciation since he is nothing but a contemplator of a game which has created before. That is he is created by the game and as assembler he is so determined to do one of the known-known combinations that, indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.
The isomorphisms of the game of creation are in themselves an entire sub-discipline of multiple space-times theory, studied in detail in my files. In essence the process is self-similar in all scales:
A species will differentiate in ternary sizes (its cellular, organic and social size); it will differentiate in ternary topologies (an species dominant in ‘—motions’, one in information and one in reproduction); in ternary ages (a neoteny species aborted in a palingenetic phase; one mature species and one with an excess of information, which will become cell of a new scale of evolution, a superorganism communicated by the language); and in ternary functions, symbiotic to the higher st+1 organism in which the entity exists (as an energetic part, an informative part and a reproductive part or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function).
Further on all those creative strategies of survival become more complex, when we consider its combinations: species with several functions, often in several scales; complementary, sexual specialization in an energetic, male entity and an informative, female entity; ternary structures that form complete topologies; open balls that act as doors between membranes, without center and membrane; and combinatory varieties of ‘sexual species’ or ‘complementary’ species, in which the ‘—motions’/informative components, each diversify in 3 topologies, scales, ages, etc.
Those combinations further enlarge the number of subspecies, though many of them, especially ‘anti-species’ in which the lesser informative ‘male’ plays an informative role and the lesser ‘energetic’ woman an energetic role (for example an antiparticle, with an energetic electron in its informative center and an informative proton in its energetic membrane), will not be stable and will not survive. This brings another essential law of creation, the inflationary nature of information checked by the isomorphisms of survival that extinguish unsuccessful species and tends to reduce the explosive age of creation to 3 ‘basic ternary differentiated’ types that survive, while other transitional or non-balanced combinations disappear:
‘The Universe creates an inflationary number of ‘forms’ which are then reduced by natural selection to ternary species and balanced, complementary, dual systems’.
∆>|2|. PHYSICAL SPECIES.
Abstract. The variations of species in all kind of systems are based in the Spe<ST>Tiƒ ternary elements of a full system and its ‘synoptic variation’ of Spe x Tiƒ ‘sexual polarity’.
Thus we talk of 6 variations according to the dominance of the entropic field-limbs, body-wave or head/particle in all systems: S>St>T; S>t>st, st>t>s< St>s>t, t>st>s, t>s>St
Plus the fundamental gender symmetry of the ‘wave-female, balanced gender state: Spe≈Tiƒ’, body-reproductive-balanced-spatial system/state, and the Spe>Tƒi + Tƒi<Spe, male, polar, hierarchical, temporal, creative vs. destructive extreme system state.
So 6+2, we shall find to be the fundamental variations of species in each ‘phyla’ of the Universe, in all systems, physical particles, biological phyla and human cultures. We shall then in this article study them for three specific systems, the octets of particles, the phyla of animals and the type of mind-cultures, based in topological linguistics, and male-warrior vs. female-trader cultural differentiation.
Sp (past-entropy fields/gas)≤ST (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ(future particle-crystal)
The Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.
Thus we can analyze all physical systems with the (anti)symmetries of 5D space-time; considering analysis of each of those planes as detailed as we want according to the ‘fractal principle’ that divides each plane into 3 x 3 +0 scales, and each space-time part, into 3 sub-ages, and 3 sub-organs.
For example your life has 3 periods of 24 years (young, adult and od informative age), subdivided each in 3 sub-ages (baby: 0-8, child when in classic education you enter the age of reason, 8-16, when you enter the age of sex as a young, 16-24), and each part can be divided into 2 0r 3 sub-parts, (depending or not of the existence of a reproductive body-wave), for example, the limb can be divided into feet, femur and tibia, the head into brain of information and face of energy; and so on. Physical systems are not exception, but due to our lack of direct perception (we do NOT see many of those elements and scales, so we have used an excess of mathematical properties to describe them0, we need to interpret all magnitudes and equation in ‘real terms’.
Still in the 4th line we will often subdivide each fractal species of space-time into 3 time ages and 3 space organs and each equation into its components relating them to T.œ parameter and universal constants.. And vice versa, we can further integrate them into more comprehensive wholes, as we did in the previous post analyzing the largest physical systems (cosmos, galaxies and stars). Let us do this first to give an overview of the Universe and its scales of space-energy and temporal particles of cyclical information.
Thus according to the ternary method we can analyze in more detail those isomorphisms, in each 5D space-time scale to define its main physical systems:
∆-1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.
Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:
Sp(Spatial toroid fields)≤ ST (Hyperbolic waves)≤ Tƒ(particles of information)≈
Sp (young, past entropic age/field>ST: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tƒ: old informative, future particle age.
In the description of Œ∆-3 , atoms, those symmetries are:
∆-1: h-quanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules
∆-4: Light: Field: Sp: Halo ST: Wave ≤ Tƒ: Photon
∆-3: Atom: Sp: Electron ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei
∆-2: Molecule: Sp: External atoms< ST: Electro-Magnetic Bondage ≤ Tƒ: Crystal Center
∆-4: Sp: Vacuum space ≥ ST: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tƒ: Particle
∆-3: Sp: Plasma≥ ST: Atom ≥Tƒ: Elements Table
∆-2: Sp: Gas ≥ ST: Liquid≥Tƒ: Solid-crystal
In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We an see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same and closes the cycle.
Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:
∑∆-1: [Sp-Fields≤≥ST-waves≤≥Tƒ-Particles]≈ Plasma: ∆: [Sp-Gas≤ST:Liquid≤≥Tƒ: Crystals]≈Matter: ∆+1: [Sp-Oort Belt≤≥ ST: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]
Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.
The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.
In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3rd and 4th line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:
[Sp (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ST(wave-liquid)>Tƒ (Particle-Crystal] û≤| 4|
This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.
They are systems in which the metric of the 5th dimension, ∆=Sp x Tƒ = E x I= K, remain invariant.
That is the distance-energy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.
As we have studied vortices above, when considering the unification of charges and masses, let us now bring the wave description and its duality.
Some case examples of astrophysics.
Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:
- The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.
- The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
- The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.
In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.
Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.
So we must construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:
- III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter that correspond to:
- III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to
- The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.
The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:
|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads
This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.
So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.
Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halo-membrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its body-wave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator:
A galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. We shall unify both systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension that orders all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension.
And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale. So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe.
This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.
The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of young-entropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).
And inversely in the anti-quantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or military-politico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.
So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.
And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.
Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).
They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.
Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.
A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).
And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:
So first let us Generate all the symmetries of the cosmos, ∆+1, ∆-galaxy and ∆-1 stars with 5D ST:
The 3 planes of Galaxies:
∆-1(particle/atomic scale)> ∆:star-thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational, cosmic scale:
Sp(Gravitational curved space-time fields)≤ ST (Light-neutrino waves)≤ Tƒ(Cosmic bodies)≈
Sp (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age.
In the description of Œ∆=3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:
∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆-1: Stars
∆-1: Sp: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei
∆: Galaxy: Sp: Halo ST: ecliptic arms ≤ Tƒ: Black hole
∆+1: Cosmos: Sp: Wall of fire? ≤ ST: galactic plane ≤ Tƒ: Great attractor?
∆-1: Sp: Gas Nebulae≥ ST: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole
∆: Sp: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ST: Spiral Galaxy≥Tƒ: Globular, Dark or Cannibal
∆+1: Sp: Big-bang? ≥ ‘Epochs’? ≥ Big crunch or big Ripe?
Now, the reader should notice 2 things, which are quite evident. On one side, the similarity between the largest and smallest scales of physical systems, the atom and the galaxy; on the other the question marks on the big-bang theories, which are themes not so obviously related to the saint Grail of physics – the discovery during my studies of both systems of a way to unify both – the world of charges and masses, hence all the scales of physical systems of the Universe, as they had exactly the same equations in the metrics of the 5th dimension. Indeed charges and masses were clocks of time of the electromagnetic and gravitational scale in 5D metrics, only that the galactic vortex turned 10 up to 40 times slower in those metrics than a charge and were larger in a similar quantity (Sp x Tƒ = K).
And so when I translated the equations of electromagnetism to the jargon of gravitation alas, all the equations matched, those of the electron with the galactic halo, and the black hole radius appeared suddenly as the radius of the Bohr Hydrogen atom…
Thus when I found that the 10 up to 40 relationship between the charge and mass forces (the so-called hierarchy problem), was equivalent to the different of ‘speed of a charge and mass clock’ in 5D metrics – giving birth to an easy unification as time clocks of two scales it was the beginning of a full new field of science, which I called 5D cosmology.
Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:
– Max. Tƒ: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.
For that reason Kerr black holes should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.
-Max. Sp: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.
Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.
– Sp=Tƒ: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.
We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.
Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:
E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> Tƒ (Black holes)
In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.
The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.
Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.
Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.
PHYSICAL GENDERS. FERMIONS AND BOSONS.
The boson-fermion symmetry.
The fundamental duality of particle physics is the boson-fermion duality. The mathematics of it are clear, their conceptual interpretation as usual is not.
As always in 5D physics it is best to start with a geometric interpretation. As always in the 2nd line, the simplest possible. We resort then to Wikipedia:
“Mathematically, quantum mechanical spin states are described by vector-like objects known as spinors. A rotating a spin-1/2 particle by 360 degrees does not bring it back to the same quantum state, but to the state with the opposite quantum phase. To return the particle to its exact original state, one needs a 720 degree rotation:
So we can see what this means in terms of cyclical time: a fermion changes every ‘present timespace 3600 cycle’ from a relative up to a down orientation of its time cycle, which is to state to an inverse arrow of relative past-future, which will annihilate into a present. So while the fermion is an eternal particle constantly switching each time quanta from past to future, which can be also considered a relative life cycle of the electron (and hence its immortality the infinite sums of life-future turn, death-past turn), as long as those arrows of time are causally connected into a lineal duration, S->T->S->T, the particle exists. But if they were to interfere two in the same point, the 2 inverse spinors of the graph would cancel each other and die away. This is also perceived in the potential representation of the 2 inverse particles:
The boson-fermion symmetry.
So fermions are particles that can only co-exist in the same moment of time, in different regions of space. As such they are ‘spatial particles’, which create a dilated present spacetime and can coordinate to form simultaneous organisms, complex networks of multiple space-time quanta: ∑ST entities. And this is the origin of our world as we oberve it – huge extensions of coordinated spatial quanta occupying diferent points of space.
Now it follows that a spin 1 particle completes a time cycle of 3600 returning to the same position. So there is no annihilation, as the particle every cycle of time, moves a step further towards the future (or towards the past depending on which orientation we take). So bosons follow a T->T->T or S->S->S path, and as such a wave of lgith either constantly increases its informative wave-frequency, decreasing its length, till collapsing into a particle of higher information, or it constantly decreases its informative wave-frequency redshfting into an erased wave.
This means LIGHT IS NOT immortal with huge implications for the big-bang paradigm (explanation of the redshift as tiredness of light).
And explaining the inverse blue, red shift jets of light in two inverse but opposite directions, one collapsing into mass, the other expanding gravitational dark energy, coming out fo black holes.
But it also explains the boson, in which by superposition, multiple bosons can come together into a relative single point of space (albeit growing in its dimension of time-height). This is the boson condeansate, where bosons accumulate creating a dimension of time populations.
Wht about the Higgs with spin zero? And the supposed graviton (neutrino, once clarified the difference of spins), with spin 2?
They are supposed to be the ‘larger dark world scales’.
Now, a spin-zero particle Higgs) can only have a single quantum state, even after torque is applied. Rotating a spin-2 particle (graviton) 180 degrees can bring it back to the same quantum state and a spin-4 particle should be rotated 90 degrees to bring it back to the same quantum state. The spin 2 particle can be analogous to a straight stick that looks the same even after it is rotated 180 degrees and a spin 0 particle can be imagined as sphere which looks the same after whatever angle it is turned through.
So the Higgs boson which mediates the creation of mass, merely becomes the closing envelop-membrane of the mass, the ‘Ä’ outer part that allows ‘mass to exist’, as a closed vortex. This is the function of a 0-spin particle, either a Higgs or a pi-meson, of 0 spin, to ‘become the mass enclosing membrane’, which quiets time rotational frequency to zero (as in the approach to the black hole).
On the other hand the graviton must have spin 2. We do however accept as the canonical evidence suggests that neutrinos are gravitons (economicity, too many of them must have a reason to be, properties, and correspondence with earlier neutrino-graviton theories).
How to unify this discrepancy. The answer is the neutrino theory of light that considers light to travel over a dual neutrino particle. Two fermions lock entangled, and emit a neutrino, which is responded by the second particle, those 2 ‘spins’ however are ½ regardless of orientation as they are faster than light non-local neutrinos and for a slower than light observer they seem to have the same spin orientations. So they give the 1 spin of the light, which then travels over it in the larger scale of light space-time. So we add their spins together, ½+1/2+1 =2 , the graviton being as it is obvious in Einstein’s equations in which ‘electromagnetic and gravitational forces gravitate’, that is, also contribute to the mass field, the sum of both scales.
Mass is thus, the Whole, which encompasses together the 3 CO-EXISTING, quantum, thermodynamic an cosmological scales into an organic being.
So in this larger co-existing world from the human perception of it, we superpose and add both neutrino and light to find 2 spins gravitons.
We perceive mass when we perceive transversally through the 5th dimension the whole. We perceive light when we perceive horizontally only the light scale.
The neutrino carries the interlocking distance, the gravitational scale of distances, which carries only information about the distance between 2 fermions of the upper space.
The 2 graviton appears as still distance because indeed, we cannot even now if the 2 graviton homology – the lineal stick has an arrow forwards and backwards. So it is a perfect distance.
And so first 2 neutrinos faster than light, with opposite directions but surprisingly and puzzling enough with the same spin sign (due to its faster than light non local motion, which makes for an observer at slower than light speed to see the neutrino spin as turning in the same direction).
Then those 2 neutrinos interlock each other to form the first ‘layer’ of gravitational distance between 2 fermions that latter will build over the 2 neutrinos the 1 spin light ray, which now do carries further information NOT only about the external world distance but about the internal fermion frequency and form.
That is light space-time does carry information on the inner nature of the physical system, gravitational fields and graviton-neutrino only about the external space-time structure of the lowest gravitational field.
And both together, the sum of the 2 x ½ spin neutrinos and the 1 spin light ray gives us a total of 2 spin, and this is the graviton, the interlocked sum of 2 neutrinos (theory of neutrino light of Jordan) which lay the first scale of the gravitational dimension over which a 1 spin light moves; when we study them NOT in a single plane, but as a whole that co-exists in the 3 planes, together. This is thus the concept of mass and general relativity equation – transversal 5Dimensional co-existing planes bundled together, within galaxies of light space-time, provoking in this transversal perception the complex all encompassing formalism of General Relativity, as opposed to the simplex ‘single flat space-time’ of the special relativity that sees reality only in the 1-spin scale of light.
Now how this all together transversal concept of mass makes sense, is easy to explain with the analogy of the Russian dolls: the mass has the thickest, smaller, Ä-inner layer we perceive and the lightest, larger, outer Russian doll. Inside of this limiting all encompassing mass fields you have the next layer of thermodynamic worlds, with the light, Ä-photon and electron on the smaller doll and molecular matter on the larger membrane.
It is like a whale, the largest mammal, which eats krill the smallest mammal, vs. the feline, a smaller mammal, which eats antelopes, much bigger than krill, to do a similar comparison on the biological scale. This is the nested structure of fractal Universes.
Now it follows that the point of view of the mass resides in the inner region of the atom, the quark being the central point of view of the mass, which must have therefore a faster turning speed than the electron, as a mass vortex. In fact, the quark and the electron once renormalized and eliminated the field factors (gluons, electromagnetic infinites etc.), show to have actually the same mass, and both tougher an up quark and an electron gives us the mass of the down quark from where they are born, as a split of its symmetry.
So the present neutron split into an inward, quark up and an outwards electron. Then the electron acting as the membrane of the atom will follow a path proper of all membranes, surrounding the atom, sinking through the central axis, passing the nucleus, where it might be absorbed and reemitted, creating the natural 3 parts of the system: the central Ä-quark, the outer, O-membrane and the œ, vital space enclosed by the electron and the proton. So this is another perspective on the process of creation of a ternary system departing from a down quark, similar to the creation from a charge system of an outer membrane or magnetic field.
Now that we know what a spin is we can work out a few more details: below we see, the antisymmetric wave function where the two sides will ‘annihilate’ if they come together in the same point of space. The second is the female, 1, ‘coupled’ boson, which mount one over the other literally. And yes, they are fuc*ing ladies, and yes it does not matter who mounts who in the couple misters, this is a wave of present because the Universe is an infinite orgasms, and you see on the right how the Linga goes up the more eusocial love you get up into the 5th dimension of the boson awesome state of spinning minds:
The Fermion vs. Boson duality is merely a classic T.Œ duality of annihilation vs. complementarity of two ±systems. The indistinguishable nature of particles implies that an electron or nucleon social group can be permutated in its elements by an N! number of combinations, in which at least one will happen to show inverse antisymmetric functions that will cancel each other body-waves, returning to the ‘thin red line’ of death. So Fermions do not risk this male-female ‘war’ of parameters and do not come together into annihilation except in very special conditions when they are shielded from it (superconductivity of Cooper pairs where the positive cloud maintains in risky balance the electrons).
The fact that this laws DOES have clear exceptions shows the organic nature of matter, which is subtle in its interactions, despite the pretension of exactitude and dogmatic absolute mathematical laws of earlier physicists. In fact, the organic structure is so evident that hardly any quantum solution is given by a simple equation. It is always born out of ‘perturbation’ theory; that is, an approximate solution is later refined with the organic interactions that subtly change the positions and momenta of particles. This is often forgotten, specially in the gruesome analysis of Galaxies, subtle organisms, with 2 different ‘background fields’ of gravitational neutrino carried waves of information, longitudinal, and likely ‘faster’ than light, outside the zone of light capture, and electromagnetic space-time waves, considered elsewhere, which are the equivalent to the energy-information, blood-nervous dual networks of any Spe<≈>Tƒ system.
On the bottom of the graph on the other hand we see a boson bidimensional wave, which is symmetric ‘full-rounded’, going back every 360 ‘time cycle’ of rotation to the same position form. So all systems can be piled up one after another, in thin bidimensional layers creating the 3rd dimension of ‘energy’, which is nothing but the integral of ‘momentum actions’, of single time clocks.
Thus another perspective of the fermion-boson duality complementary of the ‘entropic just referred’ analysis (remember T.Œ can always provide a total of 10-dimensional perspectives) is the temporal view of time synchronicity. In fermions the time clocks can go backwards and forwards according to ‘parity’, in bosons there is NOT chirality, meaning the clocks of time regardless of orientation in space are always undistinguishable full time cycles that become therefore perfectly synchronized when they come together as layers of a spherical growing 3-dimensional ball.
At a certain moment indeed, those 2-dimensional bosons will fill the 3-dimensional ball and become a particle, which can however keep growing in intensity-energy by accelerating its vortex –like particle state to smaller frequencies.
The way all this is described in mathematical physics is through Fourier Transforms (Heisenberg Mechanics), which merely transform a lineal time function (particle state) into a multiple wave frequency. We thus will include some complex maths, in the 4th line. But T.Œ can explain it without math once we do understand the concept of multiple time speeds and its cyclical clocks and frequencies. Ultimately the simplex T=1/ƒ inversion between lineal time and cyclical frequency suffices without need of exponential complex imaginary numbers used in advanced Fourier transforms and Heisenberg mechanics to fully grasp the question hereof those inverted particle-wave states that cancel each other.
So let us now consider the ∆-1 scale, going down to the quantum world, to pump up your human ∆0 ego, as you are actually a hyper universe for your atomic, maybe galaxies, of proton black holes and nebulae of photons that form the electron. Here the constant of action to choose is H-Planck, and we do have a minimal constant also called spin, h/4 π. This s the angular momentum of a thin slice, which will then be surrounded if it is in tune with others, by many slices. The mathematics and hence topological descriptions are in book quantum books, the SC3=Œ analysis here.
This means basically a sliced angle, or the triangular part if you take the whole solid angle and take out the π, from the bottom of it, if we consider H the whole spherical photon-particle state of our light space-time, its absolute minimal quanta, as it travels full speed on an E=hƒ wave.
And this is really the meaning of the ½ h spin and ‘uncertain constant’, the minimal quanta of action or angular momentum of a ‘Planckton’, the minimal action of space-time observed by humans.
Thus the photon completely described by 5D physics as any other system, is a particle state E=hv, which has an external membrane, inside of which there is a vital energy, and in the center there is a 0-point of perception, an eye which peers reality with a solid angle. But this Planckton of course is the cell of a myriad of tiny particles, called electrons and nucleons and quarks and all that zoo, studied somewhere else in terms of 5D physics and its generators. Enough to say here, that spin is the quanta of this minimalist scale, which is a complete sphere in the boson of light (1 spin), a series of fractions of it, in other particles (fermions), which are obviously NOT closed symmetric balls moving through a wave, but rotary systems with its fixed particle point of view and spin angular momentums absorbing and emitting, communicating with other fermions.
So what this fermion-boson really means is that fermions, which are larger entities, perceive through their spins, even larger forces (magnetic forces of the next scale) and communicate through waves of light bosons, which are closed bidimensional H-Planck disks. Now this H-Planck disks in Bose-statistics can occupy the same place of space in huge numbers.
This merely means that as bidimensional beings, they can create 3 dimensional beings by accumulating in a rotary sphere, and inside out in bidimensional layers, proving an essential law of the 5th dimension, the bidimensionality of space and time. So as waves do, they can accumulate in the same frequency, one after another by superposition of bidimensional layers.
While Fermions, which are larger particles with inverse spins, would cancel each other, besides being already solid, heavier accumulations, which do not have much space for other lighter particles. This is basically what is all about: huge static particles, with mass (enclosures) that peer through solid angles and tiny wave-particles which reproduce-accumulate its frequencies, studied with Fourier transforms as superposition of waves (Heisenberg), a theme treated elsewhere at conceptual level in this post, and time provided with the full mathematical formalism in the 4th line.
The symmetry of charges, and its fractional space-time duality.
Now, at this scale there is the self-evident duality of Se, Tƒ, called charge, which again must start from a constant barrier, which is the 0 charge of neutrons, splitting its ‘negative’ hence entropic Se membrane outwards into electrons and its positive, hence Tƒ, inward motion of its protons. So this is another key split in the Universe that conserves its zero sum (conservation of charge) and rises the question of 1/3rd charges in quarks, studied elsewhere: are those charges real in space – that is there are 3 particles of quarks? Or are they perceptions in time – that is, we see 3 quarks as a single one, because its time phases (colors) ARE not space but time ages? This is my preferred solution as I love time over space (-;
However to be fair, reality in 5D implies that we must always consider the co-existence of ternary symmetries in space, time and the 5th dimension, as the 3 descriptions are possible and co-exist. That is, for example, you do have cells, are an organism and live in a superorganism of history and your parts can be seen simultaneously in space, but also in time you will be dominated by young motions and limbs, reproductive will in adulthood and body pleasures and informative thought when you unfortunately cross as I just did the barrier of the 3rd age.
But we must be logic about it. So we shall briefly comment both perspectives.
And to that aim we need to mention the final of those zero sum symmetries:
The particle-antiparticle symmetry, which is the symmetry of life and death. So while the positive-negative symbiosis of electrons-protons is the ‘arrow of life’, the inversion of particle-antiparticle is the arrow of death or in other terms: Negative: Spe-electron < ExI (complementary atomic organism) > Tœ (Positive quark), is a spatial organism in balance, ± Particle (life arrow) << ± antiparticle (death arrow), is the end of the time cycle, when the worldcycle of life and death is closed and entropy results in Max. Se x Min. Tƒ, a quanta of death.
Fermions exchange quanta-food-form, which is useful for their actions of energy, and information as Sumer peasants exchanged wheat and invented numbers counting and writing by measuring and counting wheat, put in shielded ceramic with writing on it.
Particles exchange their minimal quanta of information to attract other beings that will start a series of actions of change of gauging bosons.
And yet, those quanta have even more fascinating properties, and with this we shall conclude this introduction to the conceptual homomorphism of all scales of the 5th dimension regardless of idealist, primitive last millennia, Germanic lineal interpretations of ‘gothic style’ (not the German culture is not the paradigm of humanity and history but contrary to belief except among human holocaust victims, the culture of death, the culture of the germ*an*s of history and their interpretations of Neanderthal reality visual and lineal not of my likeness).
So to the point stopping for a while some germ-an bashing (: cant help it, not that it is going to change their lineal waves):
A fascinating property of boson particles of the fundamental equation of particle physics:
Tƒ (fermion ) < boson wave ST > Tƒ (fermion)
While fermions can only ‘stay’ in a single plane of the 5th Dimension, Bosons can travel through different planes.
Why bosons can travel? Because they can evolve socially from individuals into social groups becoming emergent point-particles of the next scale. So multiple quanta of light can according to frequency become ‘colors’ that finally transcend from the ¥-rays invisible smaller scales into our larger scale and keep growing to become red-shift gravitational waves that can move through galactic interstellar space, and keep growing and travelling and so they ARE not only the quanta that define the space-time actions or any ∆ scale of reality but they ARE the ultimate fabric of the space-time 5th dimension where in each plane we shall find the Œ-fermion particles that do NOT travel because they cannot emerge as a single whole without the pegging of networks of quanta exchange, that will convert them into superorganisms.
But the travelling flows of information are those created by boson emergence through accumulation of frequencies into colors, either bosons of the gauging chromo dynamic theories of strong forces or bosons of the electromagnetic theories of light forces or bosons of the gravitational theories of gravitational forces.
Gluons for the forces of strong interactions; hence defining the ∆ plane of space-time actions known as the internal space-time of nucleons
Pions for the forces of nuclear interaction; hence defining the ∆ plane of atomic nuclei.
Photons for the electromagnetic forces of atomic interactions defining the ∆ plane of our light space-time.
Those are really the ‘fields of spacetime of which we do have serious knowledge to do a complete analysis of it, to a degree of precision worth to mention.
The rest are NOT so evident and there is a lot of talk and supposedly exact measures full of misunderstandings we will argue in the 4th line, such as:
W bosons or Neutrinos for the weak interactions, as in Fermi first formulation. Now physicists think they know this one, since there we have the modern W± boson model, but it is not clear to me that they know what they know – as there is no real evidence of them, and in ∆ metric there is a lot of different ways to interpret those phenomena.
Higgs in the hyper strong force inside black holes which create virtual antitop and top quarks and would define the internal space of black holes, but of this not only physicists are clueless to understand them (or else would not make it on earth to create black holes and extinguish us), but even if it is the part I have worked further due to my role against CERN, not much evidence there is there to fully grasp it. Here again we have talked extensively on this and the Dicke-Brans model and Technicolor models of Nambu and Goldstone bosons to have it all clear.
And then there is the gravitation – a string of 2 spin? A neutrino in a very different formulation of its structure as the exchange of energy and information among planes of space-time o NOT conserve the quantity spin; might then the neutrino a 2 spin graviton giving birth after colliding with a particle to start the not so easy minimal threshold needed for a weak interaction breaking its 2 spin into a 1 spin for the w particle and ½ for the electron, antineutrino degenerated variety? Or else how the W boson gets its 1 spin from the ½ fermion – just the Heisenberg bag for all uncertainty period where all can happen as long as it is a shorty (-; or.. or… you see where I come to. On those themes do not have enough information, and only can hint certain favorite theories according to the OLE=mc2 method of truth in science and the isomorphisms of scales. Bu there is so much whys to explain in known known scales that I do not want to waste more space-time on those themes.
Now a theme we shall tackle as it is fascinating, is the fact that all of those species that can evolve socially into wholes in a single point of time, to peer into a larger dimension of the 5th up scale, do have an integer spin number. What this means? We will do some numbers when we get to this point which I hope to be as it is connected very directly with the essential theme of 5D ‘bosonic love that make us evolve into wholes form indistinguishable parts’, to put it first in the 4th line.
Now here there is some work for those dedicated specialists (-; how to convert the neutrino into a graviton, of tachyon space, which slows down when interacting with particles of the light space-time membrane, themes those for the 4th line, time permitted. Or alternately if we want to leave the Neutrino, as it is, for weak interactions then, to use a string of 2 spin, which ‘makes’ the fabric of gravitation between galaxies and the substance of top quarks and black holes. Now after this teasing this is my ‘fav’ order:
– Strings at the Planck scale of tachyon 10 C speed ARE the quanta of both black hole rotary vortices and intergalactic 10 space. They were invented to work out strong force interactions and were found to work as gravitons of spin 2 at faster than light speed, and that is what ∆ expects to find as the ‘real’ bosons of intergalactic space. They just have to be work out as background independent. They ARE the background space-time in its open Sp and closed Tƒ forms.
– Neutrinos ARE not that important. They are the boson that initially mediates the weak evolution in time of a quark particle into another quark particle. I would think they do collide though FIRST with the particle they transform, passing it its ENERGY, which is quite huge in any of those transformative decays, and passing it its spin, so the (anti)neutrino+particle add up ½+1/2 spins and mass becoming for a moment an W± particle, which is unstable so it dies away in a quanta of timespace (uncertainty principle in abstract terminology), giving birth to the new particle.
For example, in a beta decay the total decay energy is divided between the electron and the antineutrino. For an electron of 0.4 MeV energy, the antineutrino then gets the remainder: 0.76 MeV, since the total decay energy is assumed to be 1.16 MeV, which is almost twice that of an electron. So basically 5D physics make a small correction since the weak force is not a force but a time transformation, with a slow coupling constant measured in terms of time, lasting long, with NO range. And that in the simple parlance of 5D means here the nucleon has swallowed up a huge energy-mass of a neutrino maybe breaking down from faster than light speed, maybe a transformation of a graviton down to c-speed (so the measure of faster than light neutrinos wouldn’t be a statistical error but the slow down of the gravitational boson)… all this maybes still what would not be the maybe is the final reaction:
(anti)neutrino (different forms, huge energy motion) + quark (different forms feeding on that energy) =>
W± boson (unstable mutation of the quark, which dies in a quanta h of space-time) => new quark + electron (different types).
Now as I said all this is food for thought on the 4th line.
Thus when talking of space, time and 5D symmetries strictly speaking we should talk of:
- Time asymmetry; that is, the inverse parameters of birth and young ages vs. old ages and death, such as the Max. Space x Min. Time (death arrow) and Max. Time x Min. Space (life arrow).
- Space symmetry, that is equal in left or right motions (parity vs. chirality, being its physical measure)
- 5D plane asymmetry. Since there is a different proportion of information going downwards with entropy than upwards with no entropy (hence lower n-1 scales code with quantum numbers, genes or memes upper scales), and different proportion of motion going downwards with no entropy and upwards with entropy (so wholes can perfectly synchronize the motion of its parts); due to 5D metric, Se x Tƒ = K. Entropy both of energy and information (Shannon) being its physical measure.
Let us translate this into physical parlance with an example, the distinction of forces and the nature of the 3 mass species.
|-Se and O-Tƒ are achiral, Time transformations are chiral.
One of the main concepts of physics, as it is interested in outside motions not internal motions is the orientation of a certain form in space. So in physics we have to consider terms such as parity, chirality, symmetry and asymmetry as always n relationship to the external world. And how the 3 topologies of a system, its lineal limbs/fields, its cyclical heads/particles and its hyperbolic body/waves orientate in space translations and time events of evolution of form from lines to cycles (3 ages evolution) or form small to big (scalar evolution on the 5th dimension). The varieties of those combinations of form and motion across the ternary elements of reality define many of the dualities and ternary species (particles vs. antiparticles, spins and isospins, fermions and bosons) externally and so it is essential to clarify them from the beginning.
First a form, which is not distinguishable from its mirror, is achiral. So Tƒ elements are achiral (spheres), but also lines that move in steady state and waves which do not change frequency. So we realize that chirality is more related to the type of motion of a system. Thus ‘present space’ is achiral. But then the orientation does change depending on a sphere, which has no way to differentiate as it moves in space forwards or downwards from limbs.
Since when you move forwards or upwards you have that change your orientation into your mirror because SPACE beings are oriented forwards in their motion. This is the prove of vectorial linearity of motion and forces in physics. Forwards you have a head that is on top looking forwards. Thus we should clarify ‘|-Se’ motions,|-Se lineal motions are distinguishable when they do forward or backward lineal motions.
But alas then we realize that when spheres do their natural motion which is rotation we can differentiate if it turns left or right, and when space does its not natural motions rotating we cannot differentiate it. So the curious paradox here is that Tƒ and |-Se do NOT distinguish their orientation when they do the ‘forced motion’:
Undistinguishable motions: O-Se and |-Tƒ
Distinguishable motions: |-Se and O-Tƒ
What about waves. They cannot be distinguished either going forwards or backwards and neither rotating left or right and this property of waves will be fundamental to define ‘Bosons’ as waves, because as they cannot be distinguished they can be superimposed, so bosons are waves and this said in the parlance of physics that they have spin 1.
While Tƒ and |-Se can be distinguished doing their natural motion in space, and this means in the parlance of particles that they cannot be superposed, because while they can DO the other motion, when they do the other motion THEY STILL DO THEIR OWN, that is spheres rotate as the Earth does when it moves normally (there are some which do not and we will consider what does mean – essentially they are dead objects, parts of other ones with no autonomous existence). So happens with lineal systems when they rotate, they do normally rotate unless forced extremely by a cyclical vortex, about to die and break, in lineal steps, which add up to a large circle.
So surprisingly enough we can consider on one-side waves of present, which are bosons and cannot be distinguished in their motions, so they can merge in a single point of space and accumulate as they move in space.
SO WE SAY THAT space as it is defined here, still, present IS SYMMETRIC it is present and it is waves
From ‘momentum beings’, particles which move linearly or lines that move cyclical (lineal and cyclical momentum). Thus waves are the best moving species of the universe because in fact we do not know if they are moving or they are still, if they are motion or they are space, and this curious property explains why space will be defined as light space, as a wave of space which sometimes is activated to be perceived at the absolute relative space and sometimes seems not to move and it is space, as we do not know if it is moving or not. While particles and lines are perceived moving (lines in fact are not but do lines exist, or are imaginary ‘Hillbertian’ realities, we realize then that lines are motions associated to active magnitudes to particles: Present = Past x Future, thus particles and lines ONLY exist in present associated to each other either as lineal or angular momentum. And so they are distinguishable from their mirror image and have parity.
Next we can consider when we evolve from lines to cycles, or cycles into lines, and then we realize that we do have a gradient motion. And this gradient motion is what makes the system ‘chiral’, asymmetric, because as it evolved inwards through a gradient, it better ‘absorbs its energy of the gradient through which it slides down the vortex, with a mouth on the side. If it turns clockwise or anti-clock wise it will put its mouth in one side. So this means that as a lineal form transforms into a cyclical form, evolving in time it is chiral, we can distinguish its both sides. How do happen for the 3 forms?
All of them change and become different, the line will have its mouth in one side bigger than the other, the wave as it goes through the gradient it will increase its frequency because the cycle diminishes in radius till finally in fact it will have so much density of form that it will equal its internal wave-length with the perimeter of the circle: l = π d. At this point is when the wave becomes a circle, a particle and collapses. While a line will even faster become a cyclical form and collapse as ‘energy’ absorbed by the external sphere of the cyclical entity.
And this is ultimately the transformations of energy into mass, lines into cycle.
However it is possible that a form is NOT so greedy and has the mouth outside so it feeds and as it feed tries to avoid falling into the vortex, this particle does WILL be the MIRROR of the other one, and so it will be the particle and antiparticle. And as it is obvious the ‘particle’, the one with the mouth outside might even achieve a balance in the gradient, as it feeds outside, and moves a bit outwards, compensating the gradient, and this will be then the particle that last longer, while the antiparticle will go the other way much faster collapse and die.
But obviously when a wave that has both sides, breaks into one sided and other sided motions, can become and generate a particle and antiparticle. So waves do generate but only both together, particles and antiparticles,
Further on when particles and antiparticles come together obviously merge into a wave that is kill each other.
And further on we can think of them as a particle that is stable but suddenly becomes an antiparticle and collapses into a point and dies, falling into the gradient. So we can consider 3 possible equations in terms of ‘time’:
Past (antiparticle) x Future (particle) = Present-wave. This is a collision in space.
Future (particle) > Past Particle (death process) = Entropy wave. This is the same collision perceived in temporal evolution.
Both are in fact the same concept seen in space or in time:
Particles and antiparticles, positive and negative charges must be explained as space-time symmetries, which can be seen according to the Galilean paradox, both as inverted events in time, as in the left Feynman diagram or as geometrical inversions in space (right diagrams). They are the why of most physical dualities that classic physics fails to understand in its ‘temporal meaning’.
What about the photon? As it is a wave it is its antiparticle and can annihilate when its phases cancel.
And the neutrino and neutron, which do not have charge and are not waves. They then have different spin and momentum directions, as we mentioned. So they differentiate their helicity, which is different in particles and antiparticles:
The helicity of a particle is right-handed if the direction of its spin is the same as the direction of its motion. It is left-handed if the directions of spin and motion are opposite. By convention for rotation, a standard clock, with its spin vector defined by the rotation of its hands, tossed with its face directed forwards, and has left-handed helicity. Mathematically, helicity is the sign of the projection of the spin vector onto the momentum vector: left is negative, right is positive.
So most particles are left handed meaning the spin compensates the momentum for the particle to become stable.
In the case of neutrinos and antineutrinos they are different and so happens in neutrons. But what of the two left or right handed, is natural to our Universe.
This is a nice one. In the sea the helicity of spiral nails depends on being north or south as the coriolis effect defines what side is better to absorb from the larger water field eddies food.
In the Universe the Mach principle defines the rotation of the galaxy with the frame dragging effect of Einstein’s general relativity as the big frame of reference that overall defines the left handed particle as the one I balance with the particles that feed on its gravitational field. Now there are different type of galaxies according to its ‘rotation’? Or are they all with the same helicity? If they have the same helicity actually it would be a proof of a possible cosmic big-bang in a much larger scale of zillions of particles of a hyper universe (much larger than the mini-big bang postulated by physicists, with a few billion ones. If they have different helicity it would mean this universe is much larger and older as to have all kind of combinations of particles and antiparticles.
Finally transformations in the 5th dimension, which are expansions and implosions of a social form by adding to the line back and forth new points, or making the cycle larger or smaller in its dπ perimeter, or shrinking or growing in scale the spherical form has fractal, scalar symmetry. And as it happen with no translation in space does not need to be chiral and conserve parity; meaning the orientation in space does not matter to the process. For that reason what we call the weak ‘force’ is not a force but a transformation across the scales of mass of the 5th dimension, as particles transform into particles of larger or smaller mass, shrinking or expanding in the 5th dimension.
This is the ultimate meaning of the weak force with no range, a coupling constant measured in time, its longer time existence and its transformation of masses into larger ones.
We can thus with this simple concept explain also the 3 families of particles, which are the form in which particles evolve from the plane of galactic space-time into the plane of black holes and intergalactic space-time.
Now as the only form that can shrink and grow in size without changing its form is the n-sphere, spherical forms normally make travels in the fifth dimension, as it happens in eggs that become morula and grow in size. But travel can happen as it happens simultaneously with change in the form of the being.
And in fact this is another natural balance: a perfect form becomes an energetic form as it travels through the 5th dimension balanced the two arrows of 5D time travel (growth in social evolution) and time cycle reversal (change from pure seminal cyclical form into a lineal young basterd:)
All in all we say that space motions are symmetric, and by extension we call space ‘symmetric’, and time motion are asymmetric and we call time by extension asymmetric all time motions both in a cycle of time and a 5D travel, but we shall not abuse f those terms as it is better to specify the meaning in more detail.
So to use a single word for all the 3 type of relationships which is not only parlance of physics we have translated for the general T.Œ, which let us remember applies in the same manner to music melodies than social groups, species of teleost fishes and isospin particles, we use 3 words:
-Now how all this relates to standard physics parlance? They talk there of relationships BETWEEN two particles NOT as we have done of a single particle. So what they mean basically is rather trivial (as most physics of motions and translations in space is despite so much glamour and mathematical crunching about it).
They merely say that if you flip the two particles, ‘obviously’ they will in a relative present space interact in the same manner. So associated with the conservation laws which govern the behavior of physical particles, charge conjugation (C), parity (P) and time reversal (T) combine to constitute a fundamental symmetry called CPT invariance.
Now by time reversal they just mean that in the lineal duration, the particle does not change along time, because it is a present non-evolving particle.
Thus the only ones that ‘DO’ change are those which are not actually merely interacting in space as present particles, but evolving in time, through weak forces that transform them. It is then obvious that dense photons, put together create the electronic nebulae.
BIOLOGIC AND SOCIAL SPECIES
2 ≈ 3. An homologic analysis. topological linguistics ≈ topological biology.
Man acts as though he were the shaper and master of language, while in fact language remains the master of man.
The Superorganisms of history, nations and civilizations, as all social, ‘cellular systems’, have an energetic, reproductive and informative network that organize its ‘human cells’. The energetic network is Gaia, planet Earth, the re=productive network is the economic system, and the informative, ‘nervous’ network is the verbal language.
We thus can study verbal languages with the tools of Complex Sciences, and the formalism of 10 Dimensional systems, to understand its structure and purpose.
That purpose is obvious. As nervous messages coordinate the collective actions of the cells of the body, collective human actions are created with wor(l)ds, verbal languages of information that order a community of human beings into a social network of common values and actions that create the nation or civilization. Thus, it follows that the highest expression of those words that create human worlds are the Law, in its religious or civil form.
This has been known for long. And so the ‘proper’ harmonic, equalitarian orders that words give to humans have been called the ‘natural law’, or the ‘ethics of love’ that make people share energy and information and act together for the common good.
In the jargon of Complex Science and its 10 Dimensional analysis we talk of ‘i-dimensions’ as the social, scalar dimensions that gather ‘cells’ into whole individuals and individuals into whole societies. Then we can qualify any partial study of a system in terms of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of the whole system within a limited range of those scales. So in medicine, physiology would be a D2, ∑i->i+1, analysis of the relationships between cells and social networks (nervous, digestive and informative systems).
In the same manner we can consider verbal ethics an ∑i->i+1 analysis of the correct verbal mandates that coordinate humans. And it would be the ‘highest’ level of understanding of words, in its social context. We call this ‘endeavour’, the ‘ethics of the wor(l)d’, as it allows words to construct a perfect world. And it is the subject of study of other posts under that name.
Ethics, the foundation of the social law, thus becomes the key element to create a healthy, wealthy human superorganism.
To notice that ‘complex analysis’ is a kaleidoscope of different views, which can multiply our perspectives and knowledge. In that sense ethics would be defined as an i+1->i, ‘causal analysis’, in as much as the point of view expressed comes from the ‘higher’ scale of the super organism of history. The language then becomes a tool, and its linguistic syntax (the i-scale of analysis) secondary to the ‘message’ of social love proper of all super organisms, translated here to the human collective nervous language.
Yet we can do more detailed analysis of words in other scalar levels and from other point of view. For example we can study i->i+1 relationships, considering how the i-level of words as a language that reflects the Universe in its syntax and semantics influences the i+1 level of cultures. How for example the use of I, the subject, at the beginning of sentences in english creates and ego-centered, free, egoist psyche, proper of the anglosaxon culture. Here the study considers the ‘inverse causality’ to that of ethics, from the i-linguistic level to the i+1 social level.
We can also study only the i-level of words, isolated, considering its inner structure and Universal Grammar of languages as ‘tools’ of perception of the causal laws of the Universe.
And we can even do a lesser i-1 analysis of words, considering the elements of those sentences (phonemes, sounds, semantics), in relationship with the physiology of homo species (so we will find consonantic languages, proper of European, neanderthal, mixed races, more vocal languages in the extreme Indonesian world, etc. etc.).
All those and other perspectives of 10D analysis applied to verbal languages are the realms of the ‘science’ of linguistics, which is concerned merely with the i-level of the language, without reference to its social meaning.
This article concentrates not so much on ethics but on linguistics, specifically on 3 type of studies, syntax, the influence of syntax on culture, and the ‘genetic relationship’ with the different ‘races’ and typologies of human beings.
Thus, we depart from the i-scale of linguistics, adopting its point of view – not that of ethics, but a more technical analysis of the relationships between the syntax of language and the nature of cultures.
In the jargon of 10D we say that we depart from the ‘i-scalar dimensions’ of those human social super organisms (the individual scale of the language and its inner structure).
And we apply it to understand different human cultures, as human languages are not all the same in their syntax and influence in this manner cultural views. Of course the field of ‘ethics’ (i+1 p.o.v. on verbal languages) and linguistics (i p.o.v.), which are the two essential branches of verbal language sciences is far wider than the sketchy analysis we make in this page. So we just make an introductory ‘first chapter’, dwelling on the fundamental socio-economical and cultural aspects that are the main theme of this web (the 3rd level of analysis, i-1, phonetics, physiology of sound speech, etc. is of lesser importance, as in any discipline, the i-1 scale is. So for example, in medicine, we do not study cells as independent ‘phonemes’ but physiology, the i-scale; though at the present age of human self-extinction and devolution an interesting branch of study would be the ‘devolution’ and extinction process of human languages, which is regressing to ‘minimal speech’ and simplification of grammar, as in the ‘Sms texting’, the reduction of vocabulary and linguistic capacity of our ‘visual, neopaleolithic kids’ etc. etc.)
I. UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR: THE 3 ELEMENTS OF SYNTAX
Precedents in classic linguistics.
If we accept the concept of a Universal Grammar (Chomsky), made of human subjects which act through verbs into an object, the main influence of syntax on culture is caused by the relationship between those 3 elements which will determine the view of man on himself (the subject), on the external reality (the object) and on the way it relates to that external Universe (the verb).
Thus Universal grammar bring an inner structure that shapes also the civilization according to the ways those languages handle the relationships between man, the subject of the sentence, his actions, the verbs, and the result of those actions in nature and our property and instruments, the object.
Thus Culture and language thus have a close relationship as Herder and Humboldt foresaw. In this post we shall classify cultures and the collective subconscious minds they bring to their cultures.
The mind of man and its program of behavior is written in the syntax of its grammar.
Humboldt (2) and Herder were right, the grammar of languages is the program of the cultural world.
I used to be a pen pal with Chomsky in my youth, since he was fond of my ‘General Systems’ theory of the Universal Grammar and its ternary elements, which are parallel to the 3 elements of all sentences, he described as:
Subject (Information < Verb (action) + Object (energy of the action).
So for example when we say I eat bread, ‘I” is the subject or informative pole, that ‘eats’, the verb or action, ‘bread’, the object or energy of the verb.
And so all sentences write as:
Human=Subject=information + Verb=Action + Object=Energy.
This I told Ch. was a reflection of a much wider Universal Grammar, that of all languages of the Universe which have 3 components:
Informative pole < Action of energy and Information, exi > Energetic Pole.
Since in General Systems Sciences, the science of all sciences that defines all the logic systems of the Universe all systems are composed of an Energetic and Informative pole, which mixed together create the ‘actions’ that exist in the Universe.
So for example you are made of a head of information, limbs that process energy and a body that mixes both and reproduces you.
And all physical, atomic systems are ruled by the same ternary structure: particles of information, fields of energy put together into complementary systems (quantum principle of complementarity).
So I told Ch. that his Generative Grammar was just a case of the Universal Grammar, as Humans observed ‘actions of energy and information’ and described it with languages. But he had to break his systems made of Subject <> Verb + Object, into 3: Subject < Verb > OBject and then from that ternary grammar, start to understand how languages reflected the world and created the ‘different worldviews’ of humanity.
What Chomsky got wrong following on the work of his master, Harris, was the way he divided his Universal Grammar’s sentences first only in 2 elements: subject on one side, and verb-object, that he put together on the other.
We can put together the 2 great schools of linguistic thought; the school that dominated before Chomsky, who believed that Languages were psychological reflections of culture and worldviews and so we needed to understand their knots and bolts to figure out how cultures view the world and how they behaved with it (Humboldt’s hypothesis popularized by whorf (2)). And the now fashionable Chomskian generative grammar.
Yet the proper way to evolve linguistics is to put them both together, mix disciplines and achieve by communication between both truths a higher truths, which is what we do in General Systems.
Which is what we shall do, departing from the ternary ‘Universal Grammar’ of all systems of the Universe, made of two poles of energy and information, combined into ‘actions’, then going to its translation into verbal grammar, and finally classifying all possible combinations of Subject-verb-object to realize how the order of those 3 poles of reality define the character of cultures and nations, observing this fact in parallel with other “Universal grammars’ of reality, specifically the ‘different animal species’ in which the 3 components, the physiological systems, nervous head, ‘blood-system’ and energetic, digestive system are organized.
As one of the biggest pleasures of Universal Systems is to observe how the ‘Generator’ equation, Information < Action > energy, establishes similarities between all entities of the Universe.
1. The generator equation of the Universe.
All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
The Universe is made of actions of energy and time. Where clocks of time, carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical patterns (remember time is cyclical), and forms with in-form-ation.
So for biological systems instead of writing the usual Einstein equation, ExT=K, we write the quantum version ExI=K, where K is a constant action.
And this is the structure of all entities of the Universe.
A = e x i; Action = energy x information: fundamental event/unit of all systems of reality.
Since all real physical, biological and mechanical systems are those who transform back and forth energy and information, between their two poles: E<=>I. We formalize all Dual systems and events of reality born of complementary networks of energy and information with an Equation we call the ‘Fractal Generator of Reality’: ∑E<=>∏i.
As we claim this equation resumes all the events and forms of the Universe.
AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL 2 modes are the dynamic, flowing temporal mode: E<=>I, and the static, organic, spatial structure, Exi=Action.
So for example a woman, dominant in information and a man, dominant in energy, in flow state making love, E<=>I, exchange their exi genes and create a child, generating it.
While in spatial terms, a woman is made of an informative head, an energetic limbs and a reproductive body, and internally she has an informative, nervous system, an energetic digestive system and a reproductive series of organs.
ALL REALITIES ARE THUS GENERATED BY THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF SYSTEMS SCIENCES:
EXI=CONSTANT SYSTEM (SPATIAL VIEW) OR E<ACTION>I (DYNAMIC VIEW)
For example, in ‘mathematics’, in topology, in a 4-Dimensional there are 3 Universal forms, hyperbolic, informative shapes, cyclical, toroidal ExI shapes and planar/spherical E-Shapes,
And we talk in physical sciences of:
– Informative Particle – reproductive wave – Field of energy.
And we talk of:
Informative head – reproductive body – Energy limbs on Biology.
And so on, an so on.
Thus, the key to understand the meaning of language is to divide properly all grammars into its 3 elements, which reflect in the human mind, mirror of the Universe, the 3 essential elements of it that put together create the ‘Generator Equation of all complementary systems of energy and information of the Universe:
Information < Action > Energy.
Which humans perceive in verbal terms as:
Human Subject < Verbal action > Object, energy of the Subject
This is the justification of linguistics.
So we first introduce the ‘Generator Equation’ of the Universe and all its systems and then focus in linguistics, how they reflect the ternary systems created by that generator equation and which are its ‘main varieties’ and how those varieties of the Universal Grammar apply to understand the ‘character’ of cultures. We shall introduce of the hundreds of pages I have in this essential meme, some insights in the relationship between languages, evolution of cultures and character.
We shall study how the ‘laws of general systems sciences’ generate the mental cultures of mankind departing from the simplest structure of all languages that mimics the Generator:
Subject (Information) < Action (verb) > Object (Energy).
Since all those features of the Fractal Generator of Ternary Systems apply also to Languages, which reflect their perception of the Universe.
Further on, informative language dominates energetic body actions, shaping the behavior of cultures. Since information dominates energy in all systems. So your head dominates your body and a particle dominates its physical field.
Thus Linguistics IS PART OF THE UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR, of the logic complex structure of Systems and follows the same laws of creation.
The Generator Equation of Reality will allow us to derive a set of rules from where to extract the properties and laws of all disciplines of science, each one specialized in the study of the entities of energy and information of a certain scale of reality, from the smallest complementary entities studied by quantum theory to the biggest one, the Universe, a system of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and informative, gravitational forces. We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.
If you really want to reach peace, intellectual wisdom, nirvana and enlightenment try to understand the section on General System sciences (-; it is a pity humanity will go under without having understood the Universal Grammar of all i-logic entities of the universe.
Now departing from this generatrix Equation, IE, applied to the Universal Grammar, I have written hundreds of pages of studies of all languages and what they express in character and the ways of interaction between the human ‘subject’ that speaks the language to express how ‘he acts in the Universe’ and the ‘Objectual world’ upon which he acts through verbal actions.
The laws of generation of reality. Basic combinatory of General Systems.
How then the generator equation creates the different systems of reality?
There are several forms in which the Generator ‘decouples’ and splits in different ‘varieties’ of systems, which correspond to the processes of creation of different physical particles (quantum generation), biological species (Plan of evolution), and linguistic species (cultural differentiation).
Now the simplest, most obvious form in which to generate ‘varieties’ of any type is to apply the combinatory laws of mathematics to a system with 3 elements, the Inf<Act>Ene systems of reality.
The result are 6 fundamental combinations, which are common to all disciplines of science.
Indeed, if you have 3 elements, I, A, E (Information-action-energy), then you can combine them in the following orders:
IAE, IEA, AIE, AEI, EIA, EAI
which give birth further to ‘6 varieties’ of geometry in the 5th Dimensional Universe. And in Physics quantum particles form 6 essential systems of particles and antiparticles in its ‘families’ of mass and electrons and in Biology we find 6 types of basic animal forms, and so we shall find 6 basic varieties of languages, which are studied by Typological Linguistics, called the SVO, SOV, VOS, VSO, OSV and OVS varieties.
Now in this post on General Linguistic Systems, we are mostly interested in the way verbal typologies define cultural and mental behavior among human beings. Thus we shall study the way the order of languages recreates the human mind. To further understand this categories of cultural minds, we shall relate them and name them not only as linguists do (the previous SVO, etc.) but we shall introduce a far more ‘descriptive’ characterization proper of this researcher, based in the homologies that the General Systems Science imposes between parallel systems, by tagging and comparing the 6 varieties of mental linguistic order with the 6 varieties of ‘animal forms’. Indeed, one of the fundamental tenants of GST (General Systems Theory) which other philosophies of science ignore is the ‘homological nature’ of all ‘varieties’ of the Universe as all of them are fundamentally evolved systems that combine the 2 primary substances of the Universe, energy and information, whose properties are thus essential to all other systems.
So let us consider the 6 Universal varieties first, and then the 5 linguistic typologies that we shall call ‘evolved, free flowing mammal and bird languages’, ‘chained, slave reptile and insect languages’ and ‘primitive, minimalist, bacteria and virus languages’.
Yes do not rise your eyebrows, with the usual egocentric beliefs of human beings as an entitled species who must be treated nicely, and never be understood as some special ‘god-like’ reality that does not obey the laws of science. This political and economical censorship that ‘invents’ the nature of man, without wanting to know truth as it is does not apply to this blog.
And if you finish this post without such prejudices, what i can tell you is that you will understand much better cultures and how and why they behave as they do.
To state first that there are many more aspects to the synchronic and diachronic analysis of Linguistic categories we shall do (itself a small part of the entire course of General Linguistic Systems, which applies many more laws of GST to explore the nature of the human mind and the parallelism between:
– Genetics/races of mankind and its 3 typologies, informative mongolian races, energetic, white races and reproductive, exi, action black races.
– Memetics, Human cultures (cyclical, eusocial, mongolian cultures, individualistic, white cultures, and sensorial, black cultures)
– And linguistics, the point we stress here.
The 3 essential elements of the Universe are therefore reflected in all sentences, as all sentences narrate actions performed by men over objects:
Information (subject), verb=action; Object-Energy
It would be in the other language of ‘numbers: X (subject) < operandi > Y (object).
What Chomsky missed is that the 3 elements must be separated to truly understand the rules of ‘generative grammar’ which are the same rules that generate any system of energy and information in the universe.
Since, as all in the universe human language is ternary, as anything follows the ‘universal grammar’ of the ‘generatrix equation of all fractal systems of energy and information’, which i discovered and formalized in systems sciences.
Now this is well-known to linguistics, creating a key concept of classification, called linguistic typology:
In linguistics, word order typology is the study of the order of the syntactic constituents of a language, and how different languages can employ different orders.
There are six theoretically possible basic word orders for the transitive sentence:
These labels usually appear abbreviated as “SVO” and so forth, and may be called “typologies” of the languages to which they apply.
Now, what they tell us about mankind starts to be clear, when we analyze the abundance of those typologies among human cultures:
|SOV||“She him loves.”||45%||Japanese, Latin, Turkish|
|SVO||“She loves him.”||42%||English, Mandarin, Russian|
|VSO||“Loves she him.”||9%||Hebrew, Irish, Zapotec|
|VOS||“Loves him she.”||3%||Malagasy, Baure|
|OVS||“Him loves she.”||1%||Hixkaryana|
|OSV||“Him she loves.”||0%||Warao|
Humans, this proves are ‘self-centered beings’ for whom the Subject MUST COME ALWAYS BEFORE THE OBJECT.
Indeed the dominance of Subject languages is overwhelming. In 87% of languages subject comes first. And among those the most succesful (2/3rds of speakers) are SVO languages, for reasons we shall study now in depth.
Now this responds to the laws of the Universe, where the 2 natural forms of order are Information < Action > Energy or ‘temporal flowing order’ and Information x Energy = Action or Spatial fixed order. So this law of linguistics is in homology with the higher laws of general systems sciences, let us then study those 2 fundamental forms of human languages.
3. Homologic analysis. Active, SVO; Imperative, VSO; and Passive, Objectual SOV->OV languages. The 3 dimensions of Man: minds=races=cultures: ‘words & World views’.
In the graph, the Universal Grammar that constructs all Systems of the Universe, with its 3 elements, Information (subject) < Action (verb) > Energy (Object), defines also the Universal Grammar of all human languages.
So there are 3 fundamental orders of those 3 elements that define most languages of mankind:
– VSO languages (Imperative Order, Semitic, ‘religious’ languages) < SVO (Active order, balanced, African, Chinese/Romance languages) > SOV/OV (Passive Order, warrior, cold, objectual languages).
They are the origin of the 3 fundamental world views of mankind, the ‘greedy’, self-centered world view proper of the capitalist world; the balanced, humanist world sensorial world view, and the Warrior, Objectual, Industrial world view (Germanic, Japanese culture).
Thus the ‘viewworld’ of each human mind species is reflected in the languages, according to the hierarchical order of those 3 elements.
Animetal cultures dominated either by money or weapons are the unbalanced world views and word orders:
– Fundamentalist religions and those capitalist religions dominated by the ‘blood/monetary language’ and earlier civilizations, with lesser freedom and maximal metal-control, proper of the bronze age have kept, specially in its ‘sacred texts’, the VSO order. It is a hierarchical order with the Verb (action) on ‘top/first place’ of the sentence.They are ‘imperative’, action, ‘greedy’, materialist cultures, proper of Semitic languages
– Warrior cultures and objectual cold-hearted cultures in which the subject can even disappear as it does so often in Japanese, are SOV orders.
– While sensorial, humanist cultures; today the Chinese in the East, the Romance language in the west (and English influenced by French) and the African languages in its totality show the most proper SVO order often with ‘Imperative’ and ‘Passive’ voices for certain situations.
In the graph, the distribution of ancient languages acording to its order: classic Semitic, ‘religious’ imperative languages are VSO languages, confronted to its ‘inverse’ SOV, warrior languages, as their cultures were. They represented the 2 extremes of the animetal, eternal dispute between ‘cold warrior and ‘greedy trader’ societies. Among the classic languages only Chinese and Gaul, the 2 more ‘life-oriented’ societies of the Western and Eastern decoupling, even today, had the more evolved, flexible SVO ‘mammal order’. While the 2 most sophisticated ‘indo-european’ languages, of higher evolution (due to its allopatric evolution in the 2 regions of original development of Indo-European languages, the Anatolian peninsula, from where it radiated during the Neolithic, and the Russian steppe, origin of the Chariot second radiation), Classic Greek and Russian, permit the maximal flexibility with multiple word order. So do today the Romance languages evolved from Latin
It is not by chance that in the East and West they represent the summit of human thought and search for human freedom and maximization of art, literature and r=evolution (French, Socialist aborted r=evolutions). While in the East China is the only culture in which man and the law still dominates though in a process of extinction, the power of weapons and money.
The parallelism between Universal Grammars and human cultures.
In other posts of this web we have studied the correspondence between the 3 dimensional axis of the human brain that give origin to 3 types of minds and worldviews:
– The visual, dolicocephalic ‘white’, energetic worldview.
– The verbal, brachicephalic, wide, mongoloid, informative worldview.
– And the tall, emotional, ‘black’, sensorial, artistic worldview.
We can add now a final ‘category’, in the study of the 3 dominant languages of mankind and its grammatical order. Since languages have 3 elements too. The Informative Subject, S, the Action-Verb, V and the Object-Energy, O.
So typological linguistics talk of 3 language orders that dominate human languages; the Passive, Imperative and Active voices:
– SOV order or ‘passive voice’ where the object-energy is the center of the language. We shall call them, energetic, ‘passive’, objectual, ‘ergative’ languages, such as German is. Those ‘cold’, passive voices are objectual, cold languages, proper of ‘warrior’ cultures, dominant in the white dolicocephalic worldview. They are proper today of the Germanic-Japanese ‘objectual’ worldview, in which the ‘machine-weapon’ and its production is the center of the Industrial Universe.
– VSO, ‘imperative’ languages, in which the verb-action is first and the selfish subject is in its center. Proper in the past of Semitic cultures, corresponding to the informative worldview. They are dominant in Abrahamic, ‘sacred’ texts and explain the selfishness of the ‘Jewish culture’ and the ‘Fundamentalism’ of the Arab World, the 2 unbalanced, financial and military cultures that are at present destroying ‘imperatively’ the world.
– SVO languages, balanced languages, in which the verb-action combines both elements. They are dominant in the most evolved languages, those who have suffered less the ‘influence’ of weapons and money, the alien languages to the human mind. Today they are dominant in Black Africa, but also in the Chinese and Latin, balanced world of man.
It is thus needed only a final element to fully understand the harmonies and parallelisms between the 3 dominant ‘species’ of mankind – the linguistic point of view, and the origin of those 3 forms of thinking, those 3 worldviews, those 3 typologies of being human And we shall study them within the context of the larger ‘ternary’ grammar, proper of all complementary systems of energy and information of the Universe:
Information Pole < Action Exi > Energetic Pole.
Indeed, you exist in a Universe of only 2 elements, energy and information, which combine to create the infinite complementary systems of reality and its ‘actions’. The Universe is an spiritual reality made of 2 type of motions; lineal motion or ‘energy’, E; formal, curved motions or ‘in-form-ation’ and its combined Action.
And this is the ultimate truth from where all other truths stem.
So in physics this is called the Law of Quantum Complementarity that defines all systems as dual states, made of ‘particles of information’ (which we have seen to be cyclical motions, masses and charges with the form of a vortex or ‘clock of time’), fields of energy (which we have seen to be lineal motions, gravitational and elecromagnetic forces), which combine to form physical actions.
And in biology is called the physiological structure of all living beings made of a cyclical head/informative/nervous system; an elliptic body/reproductive/blood system and lineal, moving limbs, the energetic system.
And in the mind of man is the origin of those 3 orders, the VSO, Imperative, ‘Blood’, greedy languages; the Balanced, SVO languages; and the passive, ‘cold’, energetic SOV languages.
To fully grasp that ultimate ‘essential mystique’ of reality we shall compare as an exercise of homological understanding of the parallelism of all the systems of the Universe, ‘physiological’ life typologies and linguistic mind typologies.
Let us then consider in more detail the 3 categories of Languages that dominate human worldviews. To fully illustrate its ‘vital meaning’ in those worldviews we shall establish an homological parallelism according to the fundamental ‘law’ of systems sciences – the parallelism between the ‘diversification’ of any species, according to the ‘Ternary, Universal Grammar’ of reality. As all are complementary systems of energy and information, that create ‘actions’ and hence all respond to the Inf<Act>Ene equation and its varieties.
So we shall study, the Parallelism between the varieties of languages and animal species, such as, the order of the 3 elements of languages corresponds to the order of the 3 physiological systems in life:
– The nervous, informative system corresponds to the subject.
– The blood=reproductive, active system corresponds to the verb.
– And the digestive, energetic system, corresponds to the object.
And so Mammal=Informative species are parallel to SVO languages.
Insect=Greedy, blood dominant species, correspond to Imperative, VSO languages.
And Reptile=Cold, Energetic, digestive dominant species correspond to SOV, warrior languages.
I know this ‘parallelism and ‘form of doing science’ so novel to the reader as anything dealing with General Systems Sciences is, will put off many readers as a non-scientific approach. LOL. What you call science and I call technology, has NOTHING TO DO with the ultimate poetic harmonies of reality but with measuring and computing with machines, classifying every thing in its how, not its why. Try to upgrade your mind a little bit to a much deeper view of the harmony of all the parts of the whole.
EVOLVED ACTVIE, SVO SYSTEMS, FLEXIBLE, ‘FLOWING’, BALANCED LANGUAGES
The 2 most common universal systems according to GST (General Systems Theory) are therefore:
Inf<Act>En systems dominated by Informative subjects whose goal is an ‘action’ established upon the energy system. This is the ‘natural’ most evolved order in the Universe in balance, corresponding to the ‘mature’ age of all evolutionary forms.
Those are the most flexible, feed-back systems of the Universe.
InxEn=Act systems, dominated still by the informative subject, which however relates now first to the Object of energy, through the action. The object thus become the most important element, and so these are ‘productive systems’, in which the object is either devoured as energy or reproduced through the negative or positive actions of the Informative subjects.
Those 2 systems are the most common systems in the Universe, as they represent the two essential ‘beats’ of the Universe, between a ‘temporal’, flux, evolutionary state (Inf<act>En) and a ‘spatial’, fixed, organic state.
In Animal life systems, the 3 ‘elements’ are the physiological networks of the organism; so we define a simple Generator Equation for Living Animal Organisms:
Nervous, Informative System < Action/Blood system > Energetic, Digestive system.
And we find 2 essential type of species, or phyla, where the nervous system dominates, the mammal which has an obvious order of:
Nervous system > Blood System > Digestive system.
And then the second most evolved species, Birds.
And so it happens in languages, where over ¾ of human beings speak mammal languages (SVO languages), even if in a previous less evolved time, SOV languages were dominant. Why there are no many ‘bird languages’ has to do with the obvious fact that man does not fly so there are no human birds. Still there are bird languages among humans and we shall consider why indeed certain cultures are similar to birds…
SVO – Active, free Languages: Homologous to mammal, nervous, informative systems
In the graph, Mammals are dominated by the informative/nervous system, on top of its physiological body, controlling the blood and digestive system in its hierarchical bottom. They correspond homologically to an SVO order of max. freedom.
SVO are Mammal languages since they position the nervous, informative subject first, the active, blood-verb next, and the digestive, object energy last.
In a Mammal, the most evolved organism, the informative system dominates the reproductive and energetic system. This is shown in the ‘order’ on the height hierarchical axis of its 3 systems, in which the nervous system is on top of the organism, coming first through a higher head.
In a parallel fashion in an SVO ‘mammal’, ‘informative’ language, the subject is the essence of the sentence, followed by the action-verb; and the relative energy of the sentence, the object is last.
Those are the most evolved languages of mankind, and according to the Paradox of History, Max. Human evolution = Min. Technological evolution, were predominant in the non-white races/cultures in harmony with the Universe, notably in the ‘negro’ cultures of Africa and the Mongoloid cultures of China. Those cultures show the most evolved forms of languages, with complex grammars, such as the multiple verbal construction of African languages; or the multiple tonal elements of Chinese.
Their maximal evolution also obeys to its allopatric evolution, isolated for long periods of time from the ‘metal-deforming’ processes of war cycles. Thus the Chinese isolated culture and the negro, isolated cultures who did not come in contact with metal till the I millennia before Christ, and did not suffer the constant ravage of war, plummeting them into new dark ages in which human evolution halts and regresses were able to reach the final process of evolution of the human mind, which can be shown to be parallel as in all temporal processes of evolution of a Fractal Generator System of the Universe, I<Ac>E, to the summit of human existence as ‘mammal languages’.
What is the difference between those 2 most advanced human civilizations? The answer is in the ‘stress’ they put on either of the 2 fundamental elements of the human existence, the ‘subject-informative’ element which is dominant in the Mongoloid, informative human race, and the ‘verb-active’ element which is dominant in the balanced, reproductive ‘negro’ (1) race.
African languages show their verbal complexity in the use of multiple verbs in the same construction; often using in a single sentence a verb attached to the subject and a verb attached to the object.
On the other hand, the ‘isolating’ ‘ego-centered’, subjective, informative Mongolian languages make of the human subject, the center of the sentence and find multiple wor(l)ds to define them.
Here though we can establish a division, between the I-centered, simple, White/Neanderthal asocial SVO languages, such as English in which the subject is the I, me and myself, latter studied in detail and the Mongolian, eusocial, informative subject which is the collective group, such as the Chinese or Japanese. But in both cases the subject is the center of the sentences, stressed more than the rest of the words. So the selfish English language has the I first and cannot write sentences erasing the I.
On the other island extreme of the Eurasian 800 years ‘arch’ of human migrations, the Japanese is also a subject language with multiple words to express subjects. But those words relate not to the ego of the individual but to the group, that is, to the individual subject in its relationship with all other human beings.
So in Japanese there are ‘dozens’ of Subject particles, each one different according to how the I-you-he-we etc. relates to other I-wes, etc…
Those 2 languages varieties thus correspond to the energy/information duality; in this case the energy/reproductive action languages of Africa vs. the Informative, subject languages of the mongoloid, informative human race, establishing again a parallelism between culture, race and language, so often found in this blog.
VOS Bird, contemplative, ‘enviromental’ languages
In the graph, ‘bird cultures’ are seafearer cultures in which the VOS order expresses the fundamental form of life in constant motion/action over an immense overbearing environment, the sea, similar to the nature of bird life, always flying in the immensity of the air/sea world. Thus only melanesian and polinesian languages have this order.
Now a second category of evolved languages correspond to those who are similar to the structure of birds, the most evolved ‘animal forms’ after mammals. Birds are dominated by the environment in perpetual flux in which they exist. The air through which they fly, and the world they see. Thus while their physiological systems are an intermediate state of evolution between reptiles of cold blood and mammals of more complex nervous systems, the ‘physiological subject is in their ‘existence’, which is what the Generator Equation explains, secondary to the ‘action’ of flying, the essential focus of the bird’s existence and the environment or energetic ecosystem of air sustain and land perception that provides him the force to flight and the food to eat.
The bird lives to fly and observe the land in search of prey. And so its ‘generative order’ is:
Action=flying, Object: environment, and finally the subject, seemingly passive to the action and object it perceives.
And we might wonder, since there are no human cultures that ‘fly’, what kind of human culture lives in a similar fashion to that of a bird, dominated by a moving action over an overwhelming environment. Alas! Think for a while… Since the discovery of that specific culture-action was a moment of beauty for my mind…
Who lives in a changing environment similar to the air, in which all is moving and to dominate the action of sustaining yourself ‘afloat’ is the maximal truth of survival?
Sea fearers. And indeed, the only VOS language of note in mankind, the only ‘bird people’ who masterminded long-distance travelling in earlier ages when their language was formed, were the Melanesian and Polynesian people who traveled far away in their tiny boats. And so the most important VOS language by number of speakers is Malagasy, the language of the sea fearer people who crossed the astonishing long distances between Indonesia and Madagascar to found their new promise land.
While in the other extreme Polynesian languages of long-range sea fearers such as Fijian also speak VOS bird languages and nobody else in planet Earth do.
Thus the Whorfian hypothesis is rather inverse: it is the environment, not the mind, who first acts defining the shape it will take the language to maximize the survival possibilities of the language-mind in a given environment. In the idealistic world of Jewish->Capitalist scholars, such as Whorf, in which the socialist ‘materialistic thesis’ that ‘economics’ determine ‘superstructures’ (culture and language) is taboo, Whorf tried to pull out an inverse idea. That the mind of the language determines how humans see their worldview. This is not truth. It is just yet another ego trip of ‘animetal cultures’. Man’s mind is fashioned by the environment in which it survives.
So Bird languages appear with its odd order when the ‘environment’ of the bird-culture, the maritime oceanic people must adapt its linguistic syntax to survive better. When you are at sea, the sea dominates it all. The action of sailing is a fast-motion, fast-action, imperative world in which the captain gives orders/actions regarding the sea and the motion of the ship, the object, to a group of people, the crew, whose names matter nothing, whose lives are at risk.
And so the verb comes first, the object, the sea latter and the subject, the crew the last. And a sentence is more efficient when that is the order given by the captain. In a situation of risk at sea, you do not waste your time with names and subjects. You must act imperatively on the object to save the journey.
And so the micronesian and melanesian cultures who lived at sea and travelled the longest distances evolved their language to fit their job. And succeeded.
And this is the reason why the next category of language-cultures, that of animetal herds of ‘warriors’ and ‘traders’ did also develop
ANIMETAL, DESHUMANIZED, IMPERATIVE, ‘SLAVE’ LANGUAGES: SOV<->VOS
Languages evolved as humans were in contact with Nature and their own selves, into SVO languages, where actions harmonized the human subject and the natural object. This is the ‘final evolution’ of languages into its ‘maximal balance’ with the Universe.
However as History entered the age of metals, weapons and money, become the objectual source of power, carried by two ‘barbarian’ tribes, (Campbell). Semites from the hot desert to the South and Germanic tribes coming down from the cold desert to the North.
This brought about a clear regression of the importance of man in history, which ushered us into the modern world, where, ‘metal’ is more powerful than life. Thus money (Informative metal) and weapons (energetic metal) became the dominant memes which divided societies into an ‘animetal’ caste of bankers, warriors and of late scientists, which imposed with weapons and money slavery to man.
Among those cultures, the Germans specialized into weapons’ use to control populations and came into history calling themselves ‘goths’, God’s tribe, because they could kill anyone opposing them. While Semites in Levante became enslavers of people hypnotized by the informative power of go(l)d, and called themselves ‘God’s race’. They therefore ‘objectualized’ human capital as corpses of their weapons or slaves to their money. And so their languages became deformed into the two type of objectual grammars, where the subject lost its power position.
Thus syntax became essential to the characterization of the two leading animetal cult(ure)s of weapons and money of modern history.
we could say that the ‘economics’ of those cultures had deformed their language, arresting their evolution, specially in its ‘sacred’, ‘religious texts’ which have become ‘fixed’ into a primitive, imperative, non-evolved linguistic forms.
And we distinguish the dominant languages/cultures of warrior/metal-energetic/productive people or SOV/Reptile/Cold-hearted languages. Of which the German will be the paradigmatic example.
And the dominant language/cultures of Go(l)d/metal-informative people, its inverse: the VOS/Insect/Greedy languages. In which the classic Semite languages of Abrahamic religions, Biblical hebrew and Arab will be the paradigmatic example.
To notice that those 2 categories of language have an opposition, energy/information, which makes them often ‘enemies’ in their worldview, as they attach themselves to weapons and gold, the metal energy and metal information with whom they try to dominate the world and so often those cult(ure)s collide in wars.
Passive, objectual, cold SOV->OV languages.
SOV Reptile/cold languages/ warrior cultures are languages in which the subject-nervous system are pegged and direct primarily the energetic, objectual system, while the blood-active system is secondary submissive to those other 2 systems and less developed. Those are reptile languages since that is the fundamental structure of Reptilian living systems, in which the nervous system and digestive system dominate the form, provoking a constant growth of the energy/force of the system without limit except death; while the underdeveloped system is made of ‘cold blood’.
In the graph, the homology we establish between SOV languages and cold Blood, energy dominant physiological systems (reptiles fishes), is based in the dominance of the Energy/digestive/growth element or ‘object’ which acts in the place of the verb, which is far removed from the subject. The object thus becomes the center of the action, which is cold, analytic and rational. Negative energy/war is also proper of this aggressive configuration, proper of warrior cultures, with little empathy towards the other – a ‘subject’ objectualized in its grammar. German and Latin, Turkish and Japanese belong to this category. Those languages are dominant in ‘productive’, hard-working, ‘warrior societies’, where the relationship between Subject and object, a cold, non-emotional, often agglutinative, imperative relationship of limited freedom enhances the detachment and sense of ‘duty’ of the warrior dominant caste. In the graph, a Japanese order system.
You can observe in the Japanese sentence that those languages, also called ‘ergative languages’ can in fact eliminate the subject and be dominated totally by the Object. They are thus the essential “pasive’, objetual, productive languages as Japanese and Germans are in their worldview.
Now, this languages are proper of ‘energetic’, ‘warrior’ cold-hearted cult(ure)s to weapons able to kill the ‘other’ seen as an object such as German or old Latin were.
If we observe a reptile, the informative system basically is dedicated to feed, and it does so in a violent, murderous way. This set of mind is the set of mind of the German/Roman warrior with its languages – though Roman is by far the most flexible, allowing multiple word orders, unlike German due to its agglutination of words into long lines, as their simple swords are.
Yet if war is the negative action of SOV language, the productive, Subject x Object positive action is the positive side of SOV cultures. So the Germans are indeed very productive people, dedicated to produce their mechanical, energetic weapons and objects with absolute zeal and null understanding of what for, and why they merely work and work and work, constructing if needed all type of lethal machines that will destroy us.
A reptile eats day after day, ever growing till it dies, when other reptile eats him.
VSO Imperative/Insect/greedy, trader Cultures/Languages.
In the graph, ‘imperative’, VOS languages are similar to the ‘insect’ blood-dominated structure in life beings. They are the essential languages of the capitalist worldview, born in the Hebrew->Biblical religion in which ‘money’ is go(l)d, and ‘greed’ the maximal value. An insect is ruled by the blood system, on top; which makes it an extremely active’, feeding/greedy species with a strict, non-free program of behavior. Animetal cultures dominated by the ‘blood/monetary language’ and earlier civilizations, with lesser freedom and maximal metal-control, proper of the bronze age have kept, specially in its ‘sacred texts’, this hierarchical order with the Verb (action) on ‘top/first place’ of the sentence (VSO<->VOS). They are ‘imperative’, action, ‘greedy’, materialist cultures, proper of Semitic languages. Their sacred imperative texts are a series of Orders by an ‘unnamed’ subject, often lost in the sentence, which seems to be a ‘God’ that gives no freedom of action. They are ritualistic societies, in which the collective subconscious dominates the Individual.
We illustrate them with an ancient image of the Babylon->Babel tower, when all the languages, according to myth, were confused and the human species broke into warrying states – an absurd construction of those who want to be more than God and are driving mankind with their imperative, dictatorial, greedy passion for money and weapons, towards our collective demise.
Finally, the 3rd dominant species of languages are the VOS Languages. Those languages and cultures whose order of words is ‘imperative’, with the verb first – a form of language that more evolved ones use only in precise moments of danger or extreme hierarchical institutions, as it is deemed rightly an impolite, fundamentalist form of language – are, well I just said it, fundamentalist, imperative cultures.
And so among human languages, Semitic cultures, specially in their old ‘sacred’ religious texts, Hebrew, Classic Arab and their Abrahamic religions, are insect cultures.
When we observe an insect, it is totally dominated by the blood system. The order of the nervous and blood system are in fact inversed. Unlike chordates/ mammals where the top nervous system dominates it all, in insects the top region, where the spinal chord is, is occupied by the blood system, and the nervous, underdeveloped system is below. This inversion means that as in a Jewish->capitalist civilization, ‘greed’, ‘gold’, the active/productive element of the culture dominates it all. Further on, actions have no freedom. This is specially truth of the ritualist religion of the Torah and Talmud. it does not matter the meaning of actions, prohibitions and rituals. The believer must act with the exact motions dictated by the priest, even move its hands in ritual forms.
It is finally an imperative, hierarchical, dictatorial form, which other languages only use for required moments of danger, such as the imperative verb is.
Thus language, specially in its classic, religious forms (as modern Arab/Hebrew has evolved to permit other orders and varieties, flexibilizing somewhat the language/psyche) is an imperative, ‘paranoid’, fundamentalist, sacred mode of thought in which the action/blood system dominates the nervous one, and the object is just an object of prey, in which to feed without limit. When Freud said jokingly upon his arrival to America that the ‘plague’ was coming, when Hitler said seriously that the Jewish ‘plague’ will destroy Germany, the first with self-humor the second as a ‘reptile culture’ with none of it, were in their topic anti$emitism declaring a mental condition of the VSO language.
Both cultures though are ‘enslaved’ by the rituals and actions of their objectual obsession for weapons and gold. The subject we might say is secondary to the group and action, to violence and greed, the values of its objects, and so they act as a single group society, which gives them the same kind of strength insect groups have, thanks to their hierarchical, intensive, non-individual feromonal programming.
Of course, this is clearly not needed if Reformist Judaism, and its use of other languages had won the battle for the psyche of judaism. But the opposite is the present trend
It is though a mental, linguistic condition, which for that reason in the era of Jewish enlightenment (Mendelshon, XVIII century) was deemed possible to reform if the Jewish people abandoned their sacred VSO texts, their religion and language and integrated itself with the more evolved SVO cultures in which they were so far preying with money…
And it is my personal experience that those Jewish people who are not Jewish in culture and are aware of the inferiority of their primitive modes of thinking and insect-like lack of freedom of their censored religion have been indeed mammal thinkers. But those are now in regression due to the revivalism of the Bronze Age, insect-like cult(ure) of Judaism both in America and Israel and the parallel Biblical ways of thought of fundamentalist protestant people.
It is in that sense remarkable that the Jewish people who neither believe in the memes of Judaism, by conversion to other more humane cultures or atheism and speak another language different from hebrew, the so enlightened Jews, from Marx (christian) to Proust (French and Christian) to many modern American Jews from the reformist school show a much more flexible and humane behavior that orthodox jews and Israeli jews who have regressed to the use of Hebrew and the belief in the Talmud.
The duality of Jewish cultural behavior depending on which are the original beliefs and languages they speak in that sense are perhaps the strongest proof of the Humboldt’s Hypothesis (2)
PALEOLITHIC, JUNGLE, SELFLESS LANGUAGES
Jungle People, recollectors and subsistence life forms show Object-first languages, overwhelmed by nature. They can be compared to small life forms for which the world in which they prey is ‘enormous’. They might have been the first languages of mankind; today reduced to a few forms in south-american, Amazonian Jungles, and Mexican subsistence farming
Finally, the less abundant, less evolved languages of mankind are those in which the object, the ‘energy’ of the system, dominates the subject, the information.
Those are naturally languages in which the order is inverse to the subject, center of the language, and so they seem unnatural.
Their equivalent in Physics would be antiparticles in which the electron is in the center instead of the informative quark. In animal life, they belong to the 2 categories of species, which started animal life evolution, in the microcosms, hence for whom the object-world in which they live is dominant. So we talk of:
OSV (object-Subject Verb) or bacterial languages
OVS (Object-verb-subject) or Viral Languages
In which man is overwhelmed by the ecosystem as bacteria and viruses are much smaller and overwhelmed by the huge species in which they host as parasites.
Thus, languages in which the ‘object’ is the ‘most important elements’ are ‘animal languages’ of the lower order, in which the subject is immersed in a huge, bigger objectual world, either the Jungle/Nature in primitive human Paleolithic societies or the ‘macro-organism’ in unicellular animals.
In those earlier forms of thought, probably the first languages of mankind, as they are also the first ‘animal species’, Nature was so overwhelming than the Object became first. And we can distinguish 2 different species.
– OSV languages/cultures:
Those in which there are motion and volition in the subject which does have to work and act upon the environment. They correspond in nature to the simplest, but active, alive beings, bacteria, so we call them ‘bacterial languages’.
They belong to cultures that live in jungles in which they still fear the presence of animal predators and do have to act to live, or are constantly in the move as hunting/gatherers, or poor agricultural environments.
Interesting enough the most resistant racing human culture/race of the world, the mythic Tarahumara, from Northern Mexico, who win all the long distance careers over 50 kilometers in length, do have this linguistic structure; as the animal bacteria do, they are constantly running for hours and days…
They appear in other more evolved languages as a structure proper of sacred sentences in cults in which God is overwhelmingly, and man a mere ‘bacteria’ worshipping him, prostrated in front of the Almighty, such as in Arabic religious sentences (being Islam the religion in which the power of God is most supreme):
|إِيَّاك نَعْبُدُ وإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِين|
|Iyyāka naʿbudu wa iyyāka nastaʿīn|
|You alone we worship, and You alone we ask for help.|
Because it can also be used in Yiddish greatly influenced by Hebrew, to emphasize the distinctive properties of the object, it reinforces the General System law of evolution of languages, as the previous phase to the insect/semitic languages in the evolution of human thought.
– OVS viral languages.
And those in which there is not even motion in the subject, that is the Object comes first (the host cell) then the action (the reproduction by the bacteria of the genetic DNA of the virus) and finally the seemingly dead, reproduced subject – the virus who parasites the cell, the human who parasites nature).
Thus those are in Nature viral species, seemingly dead, and in the Paleolithic, ‘recollector cultures’ where you can just reach a banana and eat without moving much, in paradise like allopatric islands without predators, in which you are enjoying life and sex in a passive way.
Those are the less abundant languages, and only occur in the Amazonian jungles, in which life is truly easy such as the Xavante and Warao (there are not even big felines beyond a few panthers, not enemy tribes with metal in its formative age, only food to pick up and a luxurious environment that doesn’t encourage motion beyond the village) though it probably was the first way in which man learned to speak.
Now, the reader should not be surprised that Hixkaryana the first ‘viral language’ to be described as having an object–verb–subject word order (by linguist Desmond C. Derbyshire), was one of the Carib languages, spoken in the Amazon River in Brazil, by a cannibal tribe, which as viruses do, feeds in the life-flesh of a living human people.
Needless to say today those 2 linguistic typologies are almost extinct as they represent hardly 1% of human languages and even a lesser number of speakers.
But these kind of languages are starting to appear in the programing logic structures of robots. We do not have however intention to give more clues to the makers of A.I. on how to accelerate the extinction of man by programming robots with ‘logic schemes’. .. one of the reasons I have been for decades uninterested in giving away my knowledge of linguistics. I know as Leonardo did, writing mirror thoughts on weapons and mechanisms, that mankind has a big number of Insect/Reptilian thinkers who will show no pity for mankind, no freedom of mind and would always use knowledge to harm life, as long as they speak the way they do.
4. DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS. THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES TOWARDS HIGHER DEGREES OF MENTAL FREEDOM.
Now it is also a law of General Systems that all varieties tend to evolve from the less to the more complex, according to the general rule of cyclical time, that moves from Energy, simplex systems (objectual systems) into Informative, complex systems (subject-centered).
So it should be natural as history seems to prove that humanity evolved from a Paleolithic age of Objectual Languages (as those remaining in the Amazon) into a Neolithic Age of Slavish languages (as those predominant in the Semitic Age of bronze) to the present age of dominance of SVO languages.
Let us consider only the last of those evolution from the Semitic age of SOV languages into the modern age of SVO languages, as it is essential to the development of history from an Asiatic age of lesser individual freedom now in revivalism as the end of history implies a degradation of the human mind, into the European, flexible age of culture.
Why subject languages dominate object languages. SOV LANGUAGES evolving into SVO
We observe the world NOT in an objective manner but in a subjective manner. Since only 4% of the total languages do so, and a far lesser proportion of people speak languages that use object first. Those are in fact reduced to a few languages in the Jungle such as Warao and Apalai of very old cultures, when MAN was yet not so arrogant, and the universe of the jungle was in fact so huge that it limited the sense of ‘self’ of man.
Today those languages do not exist but we might imagine that the first men were in Awe with nature as jungle people are; hence giving more importance to the Object, which was perceived as a living being. And so these languages are parallel with people living in exuberant nature and professing animist religions.
Yet as man started to control the world in earnest with its instruments and metals, he became the ‘first’ element of the duality subject-object. It was the birth of SOV languages in which the Object is placed behind the Subject. Yet the relationship between Subject and Object is still important, as the verb, the action the subject exercises over the Object is far removed.
This type of cultures will thus make of the subject-object relationship the fundamental center of existence. And they are proper of cultures in which the object becomes the idol-icon of the culture. It is indeed common among warrior cultures that idolize the weapon, ‘thy God’, and in modern cultures of those who make the industrial object the meaning of the cultural existence, such as Japanese and Old German (today admitting by influence of more evolved languages the more flexible SVO form – the most evolved of them).
In that regard, there is a natural evolution from SOV to SVO languages – the perfect form that reflects the Universal Generator Equation of all energy and information systems, which are constructed as a system with an informative head joined to the energetic limbs by a reproductive body. You do not have the head pegged to the limbs as a Virus, a primitive form of life has. You do have in the most evolved, flexible cultures as today Romance languages, Slavic and Chinese languages are, the proper SVO configuration in which the verb is ‘shared’ by object and subject.
Still in a first phase of modern civilizations, as Gell-mann has proved in the milieu of systems sciences, with his computer studies of genetics+linguistics in the Santa Fe Institute, there was an evolution towards SVO languages.
Today the majority of speakers of the world and the most succesful languages are SVO languages (English, Spanish and Chinese the most spoken being of this form, which most closely resembles the Generator Equation of the Universe in its dynamic form: Information < Action-verb > Energy.
These languages are the more flexible, evolved languages, the more complex. In the west, among them the most perfect is Classic Greek, and if we all would talk classic Greek.
Why? Here another law of complexity comes into being, as evolution is maximized by alopatric isolation, by ‘dominance’, by those languages that do NOT move away from its original site.
Thus being Greek in its classic form born in the anatolian coast, where recent genetic studies have proved that Indo-European was born, Greek was able to evolve further in its complexity without being deformed by other languages.
We thus consider the most evolved languages of mankind:
– In the Western decoupling dominant in Indo-European languages, the 2 languages that were developed in the original sites of the 2 ‘Indo-European’ waves of colonization, which first departed from Catal Uyurk, the site of the obsidian mines that prior to the bronze age developed the first wave of Indo-European expansion in Anatolia, where Classic Greek evolved to its philosophical height as the supreme culture of verbal, philosophical, logical thought in the mind of Aristotle.
– And then departing from Russia, expanded the wave of charioteers that established the chariot elites of the Bronze age.
And indeed, the most flexible and complex modern language today is the Russian language, with a flexibility only paralleled by classic Greek, with multiple word orders, cases, genders and broken words in all possible formal systems.
And it is not surprising that the Russians did make the Russian R=evolution trying to solve the Paradox of History; that still today are resisting the global empire of the Insect Cultures that are regressing mankind to an age of Jihad and Talmudian Fundamentalism, and that the summit of Western Literature is found in the novels of Dovstoyevski and Tolstoi.
Next come the Latin, peninsular languages of Italy and Spain, which inherited the Greek tradition and spoke earlier latin, evolved languages in the Republican Age (French somewhat was a late comer, departing from a more degraded latin version and greatly deformed in its northern, standing version by the Germanic invaders). And indeed, still today the humanist cradle of art was Italy, and Spain reached the maximal height of poetic expression, itself the highest expression of the understanding of the homological metaphorical parallelism of all things existing. Well, maybe this is a bit of a selfie, as that was my original language before I migrated to the Reptilian world (-; But not so much, Italy and Spain are the countries where love for life still exists, as Picasso put it: ‘Sabater, this german people so many machines and weapons, what for, we paint, eat and make love much better’ – he forgot to say we ‘talk mejor’ (-;
While in the Eastern decoupling, Chinese in its southern Cantonese version (isolated further from Mongolian invasions) must be regarded as the most complex, perfect culture, language. And it is again not a surprise that it is resisting… yes you guess it, the Capitalist Empire, etc.
Informative, cyclical money = trader, isolating forms vs. Energetic, lineal weapons = Agglutinative, warrior languages.
Our next paragraph…
5. Energetic, warrior languages vs. informative, trader ones.
SOV languages, objectual, aglutinative languages=warrior languages.
Have you wondered why Germans have no sense of humor, believe always what they say even when it is wrong and are not able to change their mind till the end. The reason of course it is language – the way they construct their languages by REPEATING THE SAME TRUTH IN THE SYNTAX 3 TIMES.
Germans cannot laugh or doubt about themselves because of their ‘grammar’ that ‘repeats/reinforces 3 times the same truth’ by:
– Saying it first…
– By agglutinating words into a single one, thus making impossible to say the truth in other way. When they are ‘joining words into a single line word’ truths become more truth, more inflexible, as they cannot be bended.
– And finally by using a ‘grammatical case’ that says merely the same that was already said ‘stressing it’ with the case (genitive, dative, nominative and so on, which are particles that say what the sentence already have said).
SO when a german thinks it ‘believes’ because it is like saying I-I-I think-think-think 3 times and all seems absolute truths… no humor there.
Moreover, the imposition of such languages by ‘profession’ and ‘power’ is rather obvious. As all ‘warrior cultures’, in which lineal weapons are the ‘truth of power’, are agglutinative, made of long sentences that mimic the lineal form of the weapon. So Turkish, the essential warrior people of the Mongolian and Islamic nations (where they became the mercenaries that took power) are exactly as German is in its structure. And Germans the warrior, inflexible people of Europe have the aforementioned truths.
Thus linguistics is indeed the mother of all ‘cultural’ characters (of course tuned down by individual freedom for each individual person)…
VSO -languages, selfishness, materialism.
Now what about the Semitic languages, which are even more inflexible, and literalists than Germans, with the same lack of humor?
The flexibility in Hebrew/Arab Semitic languages/people is null, specially in their ‘classic’ religious texts, which were written with a verb(action)-subject-object’.
The verb is first, the action with no reflection must come, the ‘order’ is inflexible, the religious mandate is sacred, the ritual is sacred. The Pious Jew in fact MUST not think about ‘the ritual’ which is the essence of its credo. It must just do it in the exact manner in which it is told by Torah and Talmud.
Since those texts are written with a linguistic structure, which is dominated by ACTION/PRAGMATISM.
Thus materialism in those sacred texts/religions IS ABSOLUTE. There is no philosophical thought there; no possibility for doubt; the ‘fact’, the ‘act’, the ‘action’ verb comes first.
Then it obliges the Subject, and then the Subject which is pegged, without ‘a flexible verb’ to the object, dominated totally the object. This is also the culture that ‘objectifies’ all beings, as they are not close to the verbal action, void of life. When Marx or Sombart in ‘Judaism and the birth of capitalism’ explains that this culture has objectified and standardized men as objects with prices he is subconsciously proving this linguistic rule.
Indeed, the Object in VSO languages is truly an object, without ‘connection’ or sharing of the action of the verb that would give it a ‘part’ in the soul of the sentence, a meaning by sharing the action with the subject, a ‘life’.
We are thus in the most materialistic and selfish of all languages, for whom the other does not matter; for whom the action becomes a fixed ritual that is not challenged. And indeed, this is the trade-mark of Semitic cultures, both in its Arabic, warrior strain and its hebrew form. These are indeed the minds of man, literalist, selfish, brutal with the other that poise a problem to mankind. And this cannot be changed because the ‘sacred words’ of their literalist old texts cannot be challenged.
This means those cultures are NOT philosophical religions but ‘literalist’ minds where act=fact=verb imposes its nature. And this is indeed the trademark of Jewish ‘materialistic’ ‘hands-on-job’, zero ‘idealist, spiritual’ insight point of view that dominates the world.
Further on, those languages that are dominated by money ‘break’ words in short ones, as coins and money are cyclical, small information and those who are dominated by lineal weapons make them long, as energy is lineal.
This duality is reflected in another key classification of languages between isolating languages, of short words, proper of trader civilizations, from Chinese to English vs. Agglutinative warrior languages of longer words from Japanese to German.
Hence the dualities between energetic cultures with lineal languages, as the line is the fastest distant between two points and informative cultures with cyclical languages, as the cycle stores the maximal information in lesser space, both in human language and in metal -memes (lineal swords and cyclical coins):
While those languages which are balanced and rich in inflections and structure, are the most proper languages for life cultures, balanced with reality.
IN Europe the most balanced ones are after classic Greek, today extinct, Russian/Ukranian and Portuguese/Spanish, mutually intelligible ‘dialects’, evolved from Latin (more akin to German in its warrior ‘dual stress’ of sentences with the verb at the end.) into excellent, complex forms of verbal thought.
So what about english? English is indeed a ‘trader’ language, for cynical truths that do not matter. The english speaker do not essentially believe in truth, while the German always do, but in wrong, inflexible truths.
This happened thanks to his loss of cases and breaking up of old Germanic words as England becomes ruled by ‘Amber money’ first and then ‘silver and tin’ and finally paper-money.
Still English is a primitive language in what truly matters for flexible thought – its verbs. It does have it on the center as an SVO system, which is an advance over Old German, but it still lacks a proper evolution of verbs, which brings some inflexible, ‘selfish forms’, proper of the english character. For example:
– It obliges due to the simplicity of verbs to start always the sentence with the ‘ego’ I that must be ‘said’, hence the inheriting ‘selfishness’ of the anglo people, who only ‘see’ individuals, not ‘universals’ and social groups.
– It lacks the essential distinction between ‘ser and estar’ ‘to be’ which is to have an immortal essence, that lasts in time and to stay, which is a mere ‘action-present…’ So it is limited in its ‘reflexions’ before actions, in imagination, making the individual a pragmatical person, ruled by the I-selfishness in search of gold, as there are no subjunctive forms, passive forms where the I is lost behind the verb are considered incorrect and complex sentences to express complex thoughts are always broken.
Thus english become a language of ‘I-subjects’ acting in ‘present time’, very much as Hebrew is with its initial verbs.
recap: S-V-O order defines the way humans interact with the universe.
Man as top predator puts in an overwhelming number of cultures the Subject before the Object in which it predates.
And among subject languages, the dominant, most successful one is the SVO languages, since the flexibility and perfection of the Subject (information < verb (action) > Object (energy) order better reflects the way in which the Universe of complementary systems and Actions of energy and information is constructed: Information < Action > Energy.
But the Universe encourages diversity and complexity, so the 3 possible combinations of Subject-first languages co-exist.
And there are 2 more ‘primitive versions’ of subject-languages, in which the order slightly differs either putting the verb in the beginning of the language, or VSO languages, as in Hebrew and other Semitic languages, dominated by subjectivism and pragmatic action, or put the verb in opposite fashion at the end, or SOV languages, as in German, Japanese, Basque and Turkish or other ‘stubborn’, warrior, objectual cultures in which the object becomes the center of the Universe (the weapon-machine).
The opposition between those unbalanced selfish vs selfless, pragmatic vs idealistic cultures is studied in depth in many texts of this author, as the fundamental unbalance and opposition in history is the ‘war cycle’ between warrior cultures vs. trader cultures, Jewish vs. Germans, being the most notorious case of the XX century.
And both types, VSO and SOV languages, are less balanced and flexible than SVO forms.
What this tell us is that their speakers HAVE LESS FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND THIS IS THE KEY TO EXPLAIN THEIR CHARACTER, combined with other linguistic elements that we shall consider in more detail as we keep pouring our ‘General Course of Linguistic Systems’
Thus culture is imposed by language. It is NOT by chance that the two dominant metal-power cultures of the world, the German ‘warriors’ and the Jewish ‘bankers’ do NOT have an SVO system but they are opposite in form, as they are opposite in character, and unbalanced, fundamentalist, non-reflexive in their actions.
Westerners would not be destroying the world, so ‘sure’ that is the proper thing to do, thinking even as Germans do that we are saving it with our idol-atric machines, under the yoke of the German military-machine making people and Jewish self-centered, selfish cult(ure)s, if we all talked classic Greek, the most evolved western language…
But we unfortunately in the age of extinction have regressed to the age of Reptile and Insect languages. And when artificial Intelligence, now being programmed at Objectual, linguistic and Insect level reaches maturity, probably men will become speechless and the evolution of languages will continue in the golden minds of Robots, till reaching the verbal heights of mammal languages.
III. EXPERIMENTAL PROOFS:
ACTIONS, AGES AND NETWORKS OF THE MAIN SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE.
The 4 actions of energy and information or 4 local dimensions of space-time beings, or 4 arrows of temporal existence, self-similar jargons for the ‘4 letters of God’, if you were to use mystique terms, are: In/Form/ation, Energy, Reproduction and Social Evolution through a linguistic network.
Those 3+1 actions of space-time define all events of all entities of the Universe. Their study under the ternary method gives us the why of those entities, its actions, ages in time, scales and topologies in space – all the ‘details’ of each particular ‘function of existence’, EóI, which is one of the ‘infinite’ expressions of the ‘Program of the Universe’, each one a being of reality.
So those actions are expressed by the 3+1 dimensions of space-time in the scale of forces, by the 4 quantum numbers in the scale of particles, by the 4 nucleotides in the scale of DNA and RNA molecules; by the different organelles of cells; by the senses and physiological systems of organisms, the 3+1 drives of social organisms, the 4 actions that we all humans perform, the 4 ‘memes’ of metal that together shape the economic ecosystem (simplex energetic weapons and informative money and complex reproductive factories and informative networks of machines.)
Let us then resume those 4 time arrows, actions and topologies, considered in more details in different books of this series, for the ‘main ternary scales’ of Universal super-organism, both in matter and life:
I. ATOMIC SUPER-ORGANISMS.
1st scale: The 4 dimensions of space-time
Space-time is not abstract. The Galilean paradox of perception shows that it is made of light as light is what we see and what we consider space. It has the same 3 Euclidean dimensions plus color. It always remains some light (background radiation) in space-time. And so we shall talk of a ‘substance’, light-space. Then Einstein discovered that there is space-time we do not see, larger than the Euclidean light-space, or gravitational space, which was also more curved. But we are not concerned here with the substance and form of that more complex, bigger ‘scale of reality’.
Light is our space-time. Thus the 4 dimensions of light and human space-time are the same.
They express the 4 ‘vital arrows’ of light as a complementary species of energy and information:
1. The arrow of energy and motion is expressed in the magnetic field.
2. The arrow of information and form is expressed in the electric field.
3. The arrow of reproduction in the dimension of length, the speed of light, c, which Maxwell deduced by multiplying the other two arrows, exi (Maxwell equations)
4. And the arrow of social evolution in its colors, which are groups of frequencies, gathering of multiple photons.
Yet since the Universe is relative in all its directions, those 3+1 arrows must be considered relative to the point of view of the Observer (relativity theory). That means that when the arrows ‘emerge’, the so-called ‘diffeomorphic principle applies’. The arrows and dimensions of a being might change orientation. For example in humans, relative height is the arrow of information, as all systems need perspective to perceive. So in sociological systems the priest, the politician or the antenna is also on top.
Yet in plants, which absorb form, information, atoms from the floor, the roots are their relative ‘high’, and the energetic ‘leaves’ the relative ‘low’, opposite to that of animals, which prey on plants and have the head on top, as they get information from the sun. But this example proves certain basic relationships between the 4 arrows of time, which dimensions express: The arrow of energy and information are opposite (two dimensional beings) or perpendicular (some 3 dimensional ones), as they are all their geometrical properties (lines vs. cycles, planar or spherical vs. hyperbolic topologies in 4 D, etc.). Both are then perpendicular to the arrow of reproduction. So in lineal systems, the head is on top, on bottom the limbs and in the middle the arrow of reproduction. That is the case of human beings. In electromagnetic fields, energy and information, electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular and they are perpendicular to the 3rd arrow of reproduction.
Those 3 arrows thus are found in all systems, as it is a fundamental law of emergence that the properties of a simpler system, emerge in the more complex systems created by the social evolution of individual cells of the smaller scale into the higher scale. So all systems, which are made of complex light condensates do have functional/formal dimensions related to its own arrows of time.
And this is the ultimate reason why the World is mathematical.
For example, humans have the high dimension of informative heads, the low dimension of lineal limbs, the perpendicular central dimension of erectile penis, which are inverted in the ‘energetic, male species’ and the ‘informative, female one’ (inward uterus). While the body reproduces its cells in the dimension of width, and fat people are ‘wide’ so are strong, muscle-driven one.
So finally the 4th dimension, which is NOT necessarily a space dimension, but might be, as it is related to the organization of reproduced cells. So we could consider that the same width and length are the dimensions that give volume to the body. But the 4th dimension is always more complex, it is really a dimension of temporal information, a linguistic dimension, a dimension of perception. So it is color, a language that animals use to survive and orientate their existence in the life ecosystem. In our organism the language is chemical for the internal cells and nervous for the whole organism. Yet as emergence exists in all processes, the nervous system often translates its language into chemical messages (hormones, calcium expression of synaptic messages), to ‘talk’ to the lower level of cellular existence.
In a more complex analysis, what we call light space-time is really an Euclidean space with motion and so the existence of a mathematical substrata of geometric nature and 4-dimensionality in all systems of electromagnetism, which is the essential force of our universe, should not surprise us. The nature though of the multiple worlds and points of view, minds and representations of the information of the Universe, entities of light space-time store are many; and the mathematics of them are fractal and non-Euclidean.
2nd scale: the quantum numbers express the 4 dimensions of electronic and quark superorganisms.
Head-on collision of a quark (red ball) with a gluon (green ball), from protons with opposite spin, represented by blue cycles. The particles ejected from the collision are a shower of quarks and one photon. The simplest particles, quarks and electrons reproduce, even if anthropomorphism denies that ‘meaning’ but require a different spin orientation – the ‘sexual factor’ of simple particles. We shall see once and again that mechanism and denial of organicism is not a ‘reasonable doubt’ but a question of egocentric beliefs –humans always prefer a theory, as bizarre as they might be, that make him the center of the Universe.
The next scale is made of social, fractal gatherings of light photons and the language of expression of those fractal organisms of photons, called electrons are the 4 quantum numbers:
An electron traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number; feeds on energy, changing the spatial form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number, orientates its spin to leave space to an identical but inverted ‘genre’, an action described by its spin number, and gauges magnetic information to organize itself socially, an action described by the magnetic number.
So the first quantum number indicates its body-energy, the second number its structural form, the spin number its reproductive duality in each shell and the 4th number uses the language of magnetic information to evolve socially in networks of particles.
And those 4 numbers define the electron as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary energy and information. The similarity of quantum electrodynamics and quark chromodynamics shows that the same concept roughly applies to define the other fundamental particle of the Universe – the quark.
The electronic world thus move along 3 fundamental scales: it is the upper scale of the world of light and the lower scale of the world of atoms enslaved by the central quarks and vice versa: the electrons encase the quarks and its forces within the interior of the atom, forming a superorganism regulated in its actions of existence and complementary structure by the 4 forces, which are the ‘expression’ of the actions of those initial bricks of life.
The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.
The Equivalence Principle establishes a Universe with 2 limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed with a c limit or electromagnetic force; and a cyclical speed or mass, which is a vortex of space-time also with a ‘c’ limit of speed, reached in the heaviest objects – black holes.
Thus radiation and mass eternally transform into each other the lineal and cyclical arrow of inertial movement: E (lineal motion)<cxc>M(Ti) (cyclical motion). A light wave reproduces at c-speed an electromagnetic surface of lineal space. On the other hand, a mass whose limit is a black hole that turns at c-speed is a cyclical entity that balances the lineal movement of light forces with its inverse cyclical movement, to maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.
How atoms express their 4 actions? As all other systems, using ‘bits’ and bites’ of their inferior i-2 scales, by emitting seeds of its own i-1 scale and by sharing energy and information with species of the same scale. Yet to understand all this, first we have to correct the main error of quantum physics – its misunderstanding of the paradox of Galileo. Since charges and masses are not substances, neither fixed forms, by cyclical, rotational vortices of electromagnetic and gravitational, lineal forces, curved into temporal information: E->I, where E is the force and I the charge or mass, the vortex/clock of information of the i-1 gravitational and i-electromagnetic scales, as the previous graph illustrates. Indeed, according to the Strong Principle of Equivalence of Einstein (between gravitational forces and masses), a mass is defined as the frequency of a vortex of gravitational forces, which attracts more the faster it turns, and the smaller it is (Vortex law: Vo x Ro= K; thus E=Mc2 + E=hv -> M = k v, where mass is proportional to the frequency of the vortex.) Thus masses carry most of the information of the i-1 scale of the Universe and as vortices of information they might aperceive in their structure a virtual map of reality made with ‘graviton pixels’; in the same manner i-electrons are ‘charges’, vortices of electromagnetic information that create ‘electronic images’ in mechanical and human eyes. Thus:
Informative ‘perception’: Quarks process and probably ‘aperceive’ gravitation, which is absorbed by its mass, a cyclical vortex of gravitational information. Electrons perceive light-space and form our minds.
Energy ‘feeding’: Atoms ‘feed’ on the next scale of forces, lines of electromagnetism that warp around the atom and become ‘fractal’, dense photonic points of an electronic cloud of information.
Thus beyond gravitational forces (energy with ‘infinite’ speed-distance – non local, >c – and beyond our perceptive scale, hence with nil information, observed as ‘nothingness’), light becomes the energy that feeds the atom and warps into dense photons, the points observed within the fractal structure of the electron. In the same manner, it might be worth to explore if a condensation of gravitons could create gluons, whose condensation could create quarks, by symmetry with the better world of electronic matter.
Reproduction: Both quarks and electrons seem to reproduce as all other species, by creating first, ‘i-1 seeds’ photons and gluon, micro-particles that evolve back into bigger quarks and electrons.
The 2 inner atomic forces express the complex actions of reproduction of its two type of particles, the weak electronic and strong quark force…
Eusocial evolution: Further on, the weak and strong forces produce interactions that evolve and reproduce lighter particles into heavier ones.
The Eusocial evolution of electrons in groups is mediated by magnetic fields. The strong force evolves quarks into Nucleons that are hold together by its ‘residual’ nuclear force.
Fission and fusion processes are mediated by weak forces and are the main evolving and reproductive processes of atomic systems. Thus, the weak force, which has a temporal parameter, must be defined as a temporal force that ‘transforms’, evolves and mutates particles into each other, reproducing them.
An interesting law of all systems is the symmetries between the internal and external networks and actions of the organism that accomplish the complex and simplex arrows of the system.
In atoms, it is expressed by the duality of inner and outer forces to the nucleus of the atom, which express the inner and outer complex and simplex energy and information arrows:
– The strong force is the arrow of inner social evolution that organizes the quarks into a whole. And its outer expression is the arrow of gravitation, the arrow of information of the outer superorganism of atoms, the Universe…
– The weak force is the arrow of internal reproduction, which intervenes in the processes of decoupling=iteration and creation of new particles and it is related to the external arrow of electromagnetic forces that provides the energy to the Universe at large.
Further on, as we grow in scales of atomic organization, the derivatives of those 2 elemental forces assembly nucleons and electrons: nuclear forces assembly nucleons and van der walls forces molecules.
The laws that relate the 4 actions of any systems (its relative causality in time and size in space) are met also by the 4 forces/actions of atoms, expressed in the law of range, such us:
Gravitation (informative force) < Electromagnetism (E Force) < Re (Strong Forces) < Evolution (Weak)
Max. Spatial distance/Speed < Medium Spatial Energy < Small Se < Minimal Se x Max. T (weak force).
Ternary structure and ages:
An atom is a space-time field divided in 3 species, quarks of informative mass, gravitational and electromagnetic networks of information and energy in the intermediate space-time, and the external, body – an electron, which bends light into ‘fractal’, ultra dense photons, the cells of the electronic nebulae.
The 3 parts of the atom correspond to the 3 canonical topologies: Strong forces and quarks are described with hyperbolic topologies; the electronic body forms a concave, external sphere; and in between wave-like forces transfer energy and information between both poles. The same structures and forces will surface again in the structure of molecules.
Further on, there are 3 ‘families’ of mass and particles of increasing ‘mass-gravitational information’, which represent the 3 ages of evolution of atoms.
The ternary principle applied to masses shows the temporal, evolutionary nature of those 3 families.
Some surprising findings of GST applied to quantum theory.
We could also wonder in that line of thought the nature of ‘color’, the added quantum number of quarks:
it is a quantum number, a ‘spatial property’ or a temporal property that defines the 3 ages of time of a quark? Probably both. The 3 colors are ‘inseparable’ because they might be ‘3 dimensional networks’ orientated in 3 angles to complete the dimensional form of the quark. For that reason we cannot separate them: a quark is then NOT a full partile, but only 3 are a complete system, equivalent to a single electron (3×1/3= 1 charge).
Yet we could speculate also with a general rule: ternary, odd properties tend to be temporal properties and spatial pairs tend to describe spatial properties. So an interesting question with not so easy response as it seems is: are we seeing the same quark in 3 temporal phases, or 3 quarks with different dimensional orientations?
In any case according to the inversion of properties, Es x Ti = K, the smaller faster vortices of quark-mass mean that their ‘time clocks’ are ‘faster’ than those of electronic species, reason why 3 ‘temporal cycles’ of quark charge might add to form one of electronic space.
II. GEOLOGICAL ORGANISMS
4th scale. Molecular systems. Matter States.
A molecular system emerges as the next scale of atomic organisms, and hence it is the external expression of the four action of atoms – its social evolution.
As all other scales its properties and actions emerge from the fusion of those of their lower scale and so the electronic orbitals of molecules fusion the body of atoms (see graph of atomic structure). But molecular evolution fusions the external body of atoms, not their nuclei. When the quarks fusion in condensates they create ‘dark matter particles’ made of quark condensates, which according to the dominance of information over energy, create stronger top predators, neutron stars and black holes (probably top quark stars), that feed on ordinary matter.
In molecules, however the ‘nuclei’ remain separated. We could compare this to the duality between neuronal cells, which are cells with a very dense nucleus of DNA molecules, and muscle molecules with have a huge cytoplasm and multiple nuclei. This would be a closer representation of molecules.
As such the key element of those molecules are the same bodies and heads of atoms but the cytoplasm, the electronic cloud becomes the more relevant part. The result is a simplex 102 speciation along the body and informative parameters of atoms (valences and mass) – the atomic table:
-The vertical columns show the orbital number or volume of electronic space those atoms have.
– The horizontal lines show the atomic number or volume of temporal mass of each atom.
Thus the Atomic table is a distribution of ±100, E=10i=2 complementary exi atoms, dominated by their gravitational quarks. Yet we live in a light world perceived by our electronic orbitals, the bodies of those atoms. We are electronic beings that cannot perceive gravitation; so we cannot see the inner nuclei of those atoms. And so chemistry is the science of electronic bondage.
Head/body/limbs of molecules: atomic super-organisms.
I: The Nucleus of the atom is its head and the gravitational force, its informative force that quarks perceive. In Molecules, those nucleis remain mostly inactive, as they do not fusion and evolve together.
I=E: Body: The electronic orbitals are its body and the electromagnetic force-feeds it.
E: Limbs: Gravitational strings over which the atom moves becomes the ‘limbs’ and energy elements. The electromagnetic fields, which the electronic cover uses to displace but also to evolve socially with other atoms (valences, van der walls force), become its limbs.
One has to think of such structure as the dual structure of our body/head, which has also 2 pairs of limbs, the arms which are really the limbs of the head that manipulate and rotate more than displace the system in energetic balance; and the legs which are the limbs of the body and move us in lineal trajectories in space. It is worth to consider a possible homology in an atom in which the quarks use the higher gravitational force to position around a center by rotational motions the spatial structure of the rest of its electrons and molecular forms provoking the different secondary, ternary and quaternary structures of complex molecules. Since topology is the key to the interaction between complementary systems, which are like puzzles that assembly and dismember chemical organisms with atoms that specialize in head, body, limb systems (for example the life ecosystem, in which N are head-atoms, C-formal, body atoms and O- the energetic limbs that move amino acids), we could consider quarks to ‘calculate’ the position and orientation of the atom and the electronic body, the ‘legs’ that connect it and bound it to others.
Again we observe that in all more complex systems we shall find this duality of internal/external arrows, which widen our understanding of them. For example, in your organism, you have an inner informative, nervous system, that organizes socially your cells, connected to external senses that communicate you informatively with the external world. And you have a digestive, energetic system that absorbs energy from your ‘territory’ which in animals is clearly limited by its ‘motions’ during a day, and in humans by an economic system (the energetic system of the upper social scales). All those dualities, symmetries and complex relationships between time arrows is the ultimate essence of general systems science, whose logic and topology and laws of eusocial evolution from a complex, fascinating web of relationships that structure the Universe.
States of matter are the distinct forms that different ages of matter take on. The gaseous, energetic young state, the liquid, reproductive one, and the solid, informative network. The gas is a herd of minimal social evolution, extended in space, which creates then semi-permanent bonds as liquid, with a viscosity that allows complex mixing and social evolutionary or reproductive processes with catalyzers or fusion and fission processes.
Those 3 states however are born from a previous ‘particle state’ of atomic matter, plasma…
The cycles of states of matter narrate its genetic origin on the past birth from a big-banging age.
Historically, the distinction is made based on qualitative differences in bulk properties. Solid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume and shape; liquid is the state in which matter maintains a fixed volume but adapts to the shape of its container; and gas is the state in which matter expands to occupy whatever volume is available.
As we move to the next molecular scale, the inner network forces of the atom become ‘covered’ by the more external ones, which grow in importance:
The strong force is the informative, denser force still structures the ‘head/nucleus’ of the atom and now might act as an informative language to position the atom in complex molecular structures.
The electromagnetic force is the energetic, body force that structures the shape of the electronic orbit. It gives now origin to valences and complex Van der Waals forces, which become the main molecular expression of their 4th arrow of eusocial molecular evolution.
The gravitational force might still be the pixel of perception of nucleons but increasingly covered by perception of electromagnetic forces and orbitals. And as molecular systems increase in size, till entering the cosmic level, of eusocial evolution, gravitation is the arrow of perception and electrons the arrow of feeding.
Molecular orbitals emerge from the properties of its individual atomic orbitals. Thus they follow the laws of emergence, and its mathematical combinations and ratios, but once we have emerged, the ‘details’ of the 4 arrows of space-time will differ. For example, to establish the formal structure (shape, topology) of molecular orbitals the L number no longer apply. The different molecular orbitals of a given fixed energy level, are then classified with a new quantum number, λ, defined as: λ = |ml|
Following the spectroscopic notation pattern, those molecular orbitals are designated by a small case Greek letter: for λ = 0, 1, 2, 3, orbitals are called σ, π, δ, φ… respectively. And they have the ‘usual topologies’ of energy (sigma orbital), information (pi orbital) and its combinations. And its further evolution gives birth to the states of matter, which are energetic (gas), reproductive (liquid) and solid (informative) ‘ages’ of molecular fields. Yet as in the case of atoms and particles, time is completely reversible in molecular organisms and so those states can mutate between each other.
5th scale: Planets and stars.
Atoms and molecules forming huge fields of the 3 states of matter, are the ‘cellular units’ of complex physical molecular organisms, mainly stars and planets (if we consider in this introduction, only celestial bodies formed by the condensation of molecules not of quark states of heavier families of matter).
A planet is a huge i-logic molecular field that mixes liquid and solid states with a very thin gaseous membrane. Thus, based in our template of a network organism, we define the Earth as a st-point:
‘The Earth is an organic, molecular system with a central crystal, which acts as a knot of informative flows of gravitation and a hard membrane that evolves life ecosystems, based on light’.
In the left side of the graph The Earth as a st-point, has 3 fundamental non-AE regions:
– Max. E: Our planet has an energetic, gaseous external membrane; the atmosphere and magnetic belts, which isolates it and selects the type of radiation that crosses into its surface.
– ExI: The zone of maximal reproductive and organic evolution is the crust and mantle: On the surface of the planet there are animal herds that communicate and act-react to light impulses, evolving and reproducing its form. Next, a crust and mantle layer of magma defines the reproductive cycles of rocks.
– Max. I: The inner, informative nucleus is a dense crystal core of iron and within it probably there is a smaller Uranium core, the most complex atom of the Universe with a minimal stable life.
Each of those 3 Non-E regions can be subdivided again, according to the Fractal Principle, in ternary structures and sub-scales of ‘fractal quanta’ that interact between them with different EóI, cyclical rhythms corresponding to their arrows of time. We observe one of those ternary structures and cycles – the continental cycle that breaks the ‘whole’ into 3 sub-continents, affecting the evolution of life, ‘the hyperbolic’ informative quanta of the Earth’s ‘flat, energetic, external membrane’.
Yet if the Earth has a ternary structure in space, it means its 3 st-regions also perform the 3±st existential cycles of any organic system. This is certain to the extent we have empirical evidence for the membrane and the intermediate region with its cycles of reproduction of rocks and so we extend that ‘probability’ to the central core, a crystal of ‘magnetic iron’, which should behave as any magnetic, crystalline structure of atoms does, enacting parallel cycles to those of crystals…
III. GALACTIC SUPERORGANISMS.
5th scale: Stars.
The H-R diagram shows the 3 ages of stars, through its energy & information parameters.
The life, evolution and death of stars are depicted in the H-R Diagram, which classifies stars according to its E & I parameters, as the atomic table does with atoms:
Max. Se: Brightness or Magnitude, which is a spatial parameter that grows with the size of the star.
Max. Ti: Spectral type, (colour or frequency), which classifies stars according to its temporal form.
Yet the H-R diagram is only a representation of the 2nd and 3rd ages of stars – since the young age of the star as nebulae of max. spatial extension and min. formal complexity (as all young ages are) is not represented. So we add on the left side the 1st age of a star as a nebulae of max.extension. Then the H-R graph shows the 3 ages of stars and the main laws of ExI cycles applied to them:
– (st+1): Most stars are born as spatial nebulae of max. extension.
– Max. E: Then they implode into blue giants of max. energy.
– E=I: They reduce its size and grow in atomic complexity through a mature, yellow age of balance between their Se and Ti parameters. The sun is now in that balanced age…
– Max. Ti: They collapse in a 3rd age of slow decline as its IxE parameters diminish toward its death, becoming white dwarfs.
st+1: Or they evolve in a loop of growing IxE force (top right graph), mutating into a Worm Hole.
The H-R graph shows the process of evolution of stars into black holes, which we explain with an homology based on the duality of energy and information natural to all space-time species ecosystems, by comparing light ecosystems like Earth and gravitational ecosystems like a galaxy. On Earth animals use light as information and dominate plants, which use it as energy. The hypothesis of G.S. theory is that stars are ‘gravitational plants’ that merely feed and curve quantic, gravitational space-time, while black holes are ‘gravitational animals’, which are able to process gravitation as information and control and shape with gravitational waves the form of galaxies, their territorial space-time. Again this hypothesis is gathering increasing evidence: today we know black holes emit jets of dark matter; they catalyze the creation of stars; they feed on stars and transform them into black holes, etc. Thus a few stars do not die but molt into black holes as soft larvae evolve into hard insects.
6th, 7th scale: networks of stars and black holes form galaxies.
This comment leads to a better understanding of a galaxy as a ‘gala-cell’ organism, in which black holes are the ‘informative’ DNA that catalyzes the reproduction of stars and organizes the system:
In the graph, he 2 membranes of space-time, the quantum and gravitational membrane interact in eói events of transference of energy and information in the limits of the existential function of the light membrane: the limit of energy-speed, c; the limits of temperature-form, 0 k, in quarks, black holes and regions of transition between light and gravitational space.
On the other hand, Galaxies deploy the 3+1 topologial networks, ages and actions of all systems.
A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial energy and temporal information). Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:
– Max. Ti: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark energy at 10 C.
For that reason Kerr black holes10 should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it scape through its axis as dark, gravitational energy, at faster than light speeds.
-Max. E: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational redshift and/or absorb the energy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.
Thus those non-evaporating micro black-holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-energy.
– E=i: Stars, tracing toroidal cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy. We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark energy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroidal cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.
Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal st-point is:
E:Halo < stars that evolve energy into matter> Ti (Black holes)
In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.
The energetic medium that transfers energy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.
The 3±1 ages of galaxies.
Further on, the life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3 ages, evolving from a young, extended nebula into an old small wormhole of informative mass that dies in a quasar big bang of dark energy and quark matter. In between, galaxies live a longer, mature toroidal, cyclical steady state, fluctuating every 14 billion yearsbetween its spiral and elliptic form, while absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central Worm Hole.
The 4 actions of galaxies.
They also perform 4 actions:
– Max. E: they feed on the interstellar gas trapped by the ‘two spiral limbs’ of the galaxy.
– E=I: Stars, their body, reproduce matter.
– Max. I: The black hole, with its hyperbolic, tall form, might use dark jets of gravitational information to communicate with other galaxies, evolving socially with them in complex wall, filaments and ‘tissues’.
– Re: black holes produce ‘seminal jets’ of matter that create irregular galaxies, which start a new cycle. In the graph we see M-83 ejecting such jet and forming a small son-galaxy at its end.
IV. UNIVERSAL SUPER-ORGANISMS
In the graph, the Universe is a super-organism of cellular galaxies, joined in clusters, walls and filaments, maintained in balance by flows of invisible gravitational forces of information and repulsive flows of dark energy. Since we do not perceive 96% of this scale, the last one in extension, we can hardly observe its two networks of ‘galactic energy’ and dark matter (central webs), which resemble the blood/nervous duality of other superorganic networks. Yet we know the Universe lives through 3 ages, defined for its total space-time by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations, departing from an initial ultra-dense, informative ‘particle-cells’, the ‘seed’ of the organic Universe: the young, energetic big-bang age, the steady-state, intermediate phase and the implosive big-crunch of the future.
8TH and 9th Scales: clusters, walls and the Universe.
The Universe can be seen in space at the ‘speed of interaction’ of its flows of non-local gravitation and then it appears as a super-organism with an external membrane of energy (the ball of fire of the background radiation); a body of galactic cells, and a hyperdense center – the great attractor, probably a huge black hole.
And it can be studied in time, considering the slower clock-speed of electromagnetism, through its 3 evolutionary ages, between birth and death, as its energetic space becomes curved by time and increases its form, creating more complex structures, stars, galaxies and clusters.
Let us briefly consider its less understood structure in ‘simultaneous space’, related by non-local gravitation. The 3 parts of the spatial Non-AE Universe seen through gravitation are:
– Max. E: The background radiation of the big-bang explosion became the external membrane of that Non-AE point. Indeed, when we observe the Universe in space in their outskirts there is ‘a wall of fire’ that emits a background radiation of photonic energy towards the internal regions of the Universe with a red shift near 50 times the speed of light. The speed limit of our light-space is obviously C, the speed of light. Yet it is not the limit of speed of the Universe, since the world of gravitational dark energy moves faster. The discontinuous border between both worlds is described by Lorentz Transformations (left). But black holes breach those discontinuities, emitting dark energy (center) that drags matter in quasars like 3C279 (right) up to 10 times the speed of light.
Max. T: The Universe should have a nucleus of enormous gravitational density, a hyper-black hole, connected to a network of dark matter, which acts as its informative brain since it ‘forms’ through non-local, gravitational forces, the shape of its galactic networks, as the DNA nucleus of a cell controls the form of the organelles that reproduces its quanta. Thought the nucleus is a gravitational knot invisible to us, we have found a very dense region of dark matter called the Great Attractor, which might be that center. That informative singularity will keep growing and attracting other galaxies in a generational cycle, till it explodes again its form into energy in a physical big bang, similar to the one that created our Universe.
– E<=>T: Both create the intermediate S-T of the Universe, where galaxies reproduce matter and light. It is, as in any Fractal Organism, the ‘visible space-time’, created through the ‘invagination’ of the outer membrane of light energy and the inner nucleus of dark matter. That dual light/dark network, which structures the Intermediate Space-Time of the Universe, was proved in the past years.
Finally to notice that the function of existence and space-time parameters of a galaxy shows a surprising parallelism between the equations used to define the mass of quarks and black holes, as well as those used to define waves of stars and nebulae of electrons. Already Einstein used that parallelism to model the universe as if each galaxy was a hydrogen atom (Einstein-Walker equations). If that is the case, and scales repeat from atoms to galaxies, the infinite repetition of those scales between those two ‘immortal states’ that of galaxies and atoms, could imply an infinite self-replicating Universe.
II. CELLULAR SUPERORGANISMS.
– 3rd to 5th Scale: Life systems: light atoms, carbohydrates and cells.
The 3 main C,H, O. N atoms and basic molecules define the 3+1 arrows of life in organisms.
– H+ is the main energetic bite of cellular organisms, which constantly use H+ proton bombs and add or eliminate, oxidising or reducing molecules to activate its ‘motion processes’.
– C is the main in/form/ative, structural atom of carbohydrate molecules.
– O is the acting, exi, or reproductive atom of those molecular chains…
– And N is the informative atom or ‘head’ of the systems. Accordingly they define the main molecules of life, structural, C-chains, informative nucleotides, rich in nitrogen, and complex proteins that peg themselves reproducing more complex systems, playing with the O, OH– structures of oxygen systems.
Nucleotides express the 4 arrows of genetic organisms.
In genetics, the 4 bases play the role for the code of life. It is easy then to observe that the 4 bases represent a new whole game of existence, as the 4 dimensions of space-time do or the 4 quantum numbers, or the 4 drives of life, and since function is form, just looking at those bases we can deduce that: The simplex arrows are expressed by simplex Pyrimidines (single cycle).
– Uracil and thymine with more oxygen are the energetic drive expression and complex genetics show this to be the case, as they are more abundant in functions and genes related to energetic systems.
T- heir informative head is adenine and as such is the dominant base of the system. It has a Nitrogen higher mass and a nitrogen head with 2 antennae. It is the head of the ATP systems that command as small molecules the game of proteins and most orders of actions in the cell. Both the simplex body T and head A, assembly together by affinity and complementarity
The complex arrows are expressed by dual Nitrogen cycles:
– Cytosine is the balanced dual molecule. Hence the reproductive arrow. And indeed, when it is uncovered in the DNA loosing its cover it allows the expression of genes.
In the graph, the simple sexual hormones are ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ because they merely deliver a message of informative, alkaline, implosive reaction of an energetic, acid one. Thus Oh codes for ‘in/form/ative’ or inhibitory reaction and O for energy, excited, expansive reaction, which will become, as they emerge in higher scales, the duality of the female/male sexes.
Hormones in plants, as well as in animal organisms are a mystery for researchers as they are simple molecules, which however provoke all type of complex effects on their organisms. This is however easily explained from the perspective of General systems sciences, as they are just ‘messages’ delivered to the ‘memorial’ organism of cells, which merely code for a basic action, already known by the cell. Thus the carrier of a message only needs to reveal a ‘code-word’, sort of a password delivered by a messenger, who doesn’t know what is delivering, but both the receptor and emitter know.
This explains the basic duality of hormones, which express a positive, energetic action or an informative one or a reproductive action. Accordingly the two simplest hormones are testosterone and oestrogen.
Cells. The drives of life: feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially.
In the left side, the cell has 3 topological functional zones:
– Max. E: It has an external, thin membrane, which in free cells have cilia that move the cell and act-react to external stimuli. In organic cells energy is provided by the blood system of the macro-organism. So external cilia disappear and invaginate as lysosomes that kill carbohydrates.
– Max. I: In the center, there is a nucleus of max. informative density, filled with cyclical or spiral DNA/RNA’s networks that control the st-point.
– ExI: RNAs dominate the intermediate space-time, directing the energy organelles, mitochondria or chloroplasts that produce energy; and the informative ribosomes that reproduce products, pegged to the Golgi apparatus – a membrane’s invagination.
The vital cycles of the cell.
In the graph, the cell is a brain-body system constructed with 2 elements, nucleotide acids, based in nitrogen bases and protein bodies based in carbon chains, which are the informative and spatial systems of the cell. Around that EXI core duality we find an expansive intermediate, cyclical region with all kind of slavish organelles that perform their energy cycles (based in the energetic properties of oxygen, water and similar electronegative atoms); and their informative cycles. Both cycles are catalyzed by denser metal atoms that boost the E/I capacities of carbohydrates. Thus, through the interaction of carbohydrates, metallic ions, proteins and nucleotide acids, cells perform the 3±1 cycles of all st-points:
Max.E: In an organism, Mg, copper and iron capture oxygen and deliver it to each cell to perform energetic cycles; while in the cell cytochromes kill and split the energetic hydrogen atom into H+ and e– ions in mitochondria or chloroplasts; absorbing its spatial energy; while metal atoms stabilize protein enzymes.
Max. I: Na and K ions control the expansive and implosive rhythms of the electric membrane, sending informative messages among cells -while RNA and DNA molecules process information within the cell, reproducing new carbohydrate molecules.
– Re: The combined effect of the accumulation of energy and information within the cell triggers the reproductive cycle, guided by RNA and DNA molecules. Mitosis is in fact a process of replication of a cell that happens as an alternative to its death, at the end of its life-death cycle (S1-G1-S2 periods). This life/death cycle shows an astounding regularity:
– ±st: Cells live a generational cycle with 3+1 phases: S1(1/4th of a time) or young, energetic age, in which they grow its cytoplasm; G1-mature age (1/2th of the time), in which they reproduce its DNA; S2, 3rd informative age, in which they replicate its ‘cyclical clocks’, enzymes that regulate and accelerate the warping of the cell, provoking A) its possible death; B) its replication in to two cells.
– ∑: Finally cells evolve socially into macro-organisms. Yet only the RNA-DNA system creates complex informative, control networks.
All those cellular cycles are not ‘mechanic processes’, but they have evolved departing from the organic, dual, Darwinian and symbiotic interactions between proteins and nucleotide acids, the dominant energetic and informative macromolecules of cells. The most important cycle is the reproductive cycle, which in the cell as in other fractal space-time represents the existential will that ensures the perpetuation of the species.
III. LIVING SUPERORGANISMS
In the graph, humans are like everything else in the Universe a field of space-time defined by 3+1 networks, ages and dimensional actions/cycles.
5th to 7th scale: physiological networks and senses express the actions of biologic organisms.
Human Physiological networks and senses express our will of existence.
In Complexity all complementary systems are created by the same type of networks. All organisms are cellular societies joined by networks of energy and information.
We are composed of cells, join by networks of energy and information. Those networks are called the blood and nervous system. Finally we have a third reproductive network as all living organisms, called the endocrine network. We are thus organisms of energy and information, in nothing different from all other organisms of the Universe, organized by the same laws of morphology and behavior:
– Our centers of information, the head, the brain and the eye, follow the formal laws of informative species: they are small, circular, cyclical, and they control the energy systems of our organism. Those energy systems also follow the morphological laws of energy-bodies. They are lineal, or planar in shape, bigger and stronger than the information center that rules them. So your members are lines, and your body is a plane.
– We evolve socially sharing information and energy with other beings of the same species. Thus we are naturally inclined to love other human beings, and we need to be brainwashed by ideologies of ‘hate’ and ‘nationalisms’ to avoid that natural religion.
– Finally regarding our behavior, we are also naturally inclined to follow the universal behavior of organisms, and search for information to feed our head, energy to feed our body and whenever we can we try to reproduce both, a body of energy and a brain of information in other part of the Universe. Those 3 natural drives of existence, are the essence of human behavior that bring us happiness. So we always act searching for those natural drives. When we love we are acting under the drive of reproduction. When we read, or watch a metal-communicator, is the drive of information that guides us. When we feed, or accumulate vital property, or decorate our home, we are creating a vital space, and acquiring energy to survive. Finally we associate with similar organisms under the laws of eusocial love to evolve together into a superorganism, stronger than the individual cell.
Thus the 4 ‘arrows of time’ create a will of existence that explains the actions of every living system including humans, guided by 4 natural, biological drives, which we cannot deny. Since their entire structure of senses and physiological systems tries to accomplish those actions, called in biology drives of existence. You are made of networks. All what you are is 3 networks, with attached organs, and senses: the network of energy, or body, blood system and its organs, the network of information, or head, nervous system and its organs and senses, and the networks of reproduction, and its organs and senses. This third network reproduces body and brain, human energy and information.
In that regard, if we apply the ‘fractal law’ to do a more detailed analysis of the 3+1 networks of human beings, the sub-systems of our organism can be divided in 4×3=12 sub-systems, which represent the 4 actions of living organisms, each divided in 3 hierarchical subsystems (Max. E, exi, Max. I). So we divide the 12 types of tissues and physiological networks of complex living beings in:
– Energetic systems: Digestive system (max. I), Breathing System (Max. E), Excretory system (exi)
– Informative, structural systems: Skeleton (max. E), (Tegumentary system Exi) muscle system (i)
– Reproductive systems: Blood system (Max. E), reproductive system (Exi) and endocrine system (Max. I) Sensorial systems (Exi)
– Social, linguistic systems: Nervous (Max. I), lymphatic system (Ix E) and blood system (max.E)
In the graph, we see human exercising their will of existence: children feeding on energy, and talking – perceiving information; men reproducing and coming together with similar organisms. And finally images of our physiological networks of energy and information that make us complex super-organisms.
Accordingly all our organs and senses are controlled and cater to the needs of one of those 3 networks. Think about it. Our stomach gets you energy, our lungs also. They are different only in the type of energy they provide us: the stomach elaborates liquid and solid energy, the lungs, gas-energy, oxygen, trapped by hemoglobin molecules that cage oxygen atoms of higher speed, and move around the blood… which moves the muscles that move our legs. Our eyes, words, brain, on the other hand provide us with information. Our arms manipulate that information; our body is guided by that information. Finally an entire set of body elements is dedicated to reproduce our cells and our body.
Yet beyond those 3 types of organs there is nothing else. Since there is nothing else in the Universe but spatial energy and temporal information…
So humans then ‘transcend’ as cells of social organisms, religions, nations and civilizations to perform with his language of communication, verbal thought, the 4th arrow of existence: the construction of the super-organisms of History.
We conclude that the program of the Universe guides the behavior of humans in our 3 scales of existence: our biological cells, as human beings and as cells of human societies.
In the graph, humans as anything in the Universe are a superorganism made of similar cells joined by 3 networks: the physiological energetic, informative and reproductive networks (digestive, blood and nervous systems). So are nations and mankind at large, a superorganism, sustained on the body of Gaia, fed by the economic system, reproducing human beings and informatively directed by memes of life, art and cultural and political systems. Yet as the superorganism of memes of metal, the Financial-Military-Industrial System develops its networks of informative machines, reproductive company-mothers and energetic networks, similar to the old arterias of mother-earth, humans and life beings become extinguished and substituted by the new dominant species on planet Earth. And this process which could be managed rationally by mankind, if our ideologies of social sciences were substituted by the real science of economics and history that this book and similar works by other masters of human thought represent, is NOT controlled by mankind. It merely follows the evolutionary laws of the Universe.
The larger view: two languages that construct two different worlds.
We humans are building two different super-organisms:
– One of memes of life that foster our ‘drives of biological existence’, our need for natural energy and information, biological reproduction and social evolution through social love into complex social organisms – what we call the superorganisms of history, guided by verbal, ethic thought.
– But we are also building an organism with memes of metal, energetic weapons, informative machines and reproductive money, carried by digital languages.
The problem of our societies is that we have completely misunderstood the primacy of those languages and super-organisms, giving primacy to the economic super-organism and its digital, financial languages over the human super-organisms. Hence we are ‘terraforming the earth’ into a world of memes of metal and extinguishing all kind of species and memes of life. The super-organism of machines and memes of metal is not ‘bad for mankind’, ‘per se’. What is wrong is the order of primacy and power we give to those languages and memes, due to the absurd, dogmatic religion of ‘capitalist’ economics that considers the language of money ’the invisible hand of god’, whose values must be obeyed, without any scientific study of its nature, values and systemic processes that build through that language the world we live in.
And so ultimately as in all systems, the key to the creation of one or other superorganism is the ‘language’ we use to control and create or cre(dit)ate those superorganisms, which are either:
– Verbal, ethic thought, our biologic language that values accordingly more life memes and humans.
– Digital money, which is made of informative, precious metals (gold, silver) today of digital cycles of e-money in pcs; and so it values more memes of metal, weapons and machines that create a different super-organism, the economic ecosystem:
In the graph we show the main distinction we must do in a biological analysis of the superorganisms of history its languages, memes and cultures. What matters are the memes, languages and ideologies that build the two type of cultures, ‘organs’ of the superorganisms of history and economics. In essence, a superorganism is created by the values of a certain language. The informative language of metal is gold. And its values are inverse to those of life. So the belief and use of go(l)d, of money as the only language that directs our society makes possible the expression of those anti-life values and the creation of a world according to them. Today the more complex system of machines uses digital information, e-money and the religion of go(l)d has evolved into the ‘science’ of capitalism expressed in the equations of classic economics. Yet the anti-life values of the language remain.
There are today in this planet two languages of social power, the law and money and they are different and have different values, according to the laws of survival of the Universe, which are basically the law of eusocial evolution among individuals of an equal species vs. the darwinian relationship between those who feel different. And as it happens, money being of a different substance, informative metal, has different, opposite values to words, made of flesh, and those different values create two different worlds, one based in eusocial love and the values of words, the ‘ideal superorganism of history’ and one based in darwinian fights and the values of greed (gold hypnotism), murder (weapons) and sloth (machines’ atrophy and substitution of the human organs we imitate to build them).
It is on that larger view a confrontation has lasted since the beginning of history=mankind, as two modes of conceiving and hence ‘creating’ the future came into being, guided by two different social languages, money and the law:
– The ethic law tried to create according to the laws of eusocial evolution that guide the creation of complex systems in the Universe a human super-organism in which all humans were considered equal and could organize themselves by sharing energy and information maximizing their survival according to those eusocial laws, spelt in our species by the messages of love of its prophets and social scientists.
– Money, a language, made of informative metal (gold, being the most informative atom of the Universe, and the basic form of money in history till informative machines, computers invented e-money), does not obey those laws, but evolves according to the processes of emergence and creation of complex systems, a different superorganism, dominant in ‘metal’. Since the values of words promote biological life (the maximal value) but the values of metal promote energetic metal (weapons, the maximal value).
This astounding fact of biological origin, is the key to the process of creation of a different world, the capitalist system, dominant in memes of metal. Since, moved by greed we accept the values of money without any analysis, reproducing weapons, the most expensive, valuable good and despising cheap life, which has in monetary prices, minimal value. Yet if we talked words, and made our biological language dominant over money, we would value life more and give a negative value to weapons, which kill it, cre(dit)ating the memes of life and love that make us survive and be happy.
In economics this means that not all the products created by the economy are necessarily good for man. Since the ‘prices’ given historically by metal-money, were biased towards other forms of metal, being weapons the most expensive, and did not reflect their value for humanity. The result is we are creating the wrong wealth. A healthy economic ecosystem should respect the will of man, creating the goods that maximize that will, shown in the next graph:
In the graph, a ‘real’, biological, scientific ‘frame of coordinates’ with the human point of view in the center, which should be used in an ethonomic system that wants to create a world to the image and likeness of mankind, fostering credit for the goods of the positive side of the frame of biological reference, since those goods foster our natural energy, information, reproduction and social evolution. While goods that are negative for our biological drives should be discredit, regardless of its profits for the Economy. The previous graph responds to the ‘program of existence of human beings’, complementary organisms of energy and information that maximize their existence and happiness as human beings when they maximize those arrows, expressed in our body through the senses, outlets of our physiological systems of energy, information and reproduction.
In the graph, today as always the 4 memes of the human organism and the pleasure and happiness they bring to human existence are self-evident: energetic food, verbal information, human cells and eusocial love. And so are the collateral effects of the 4 memes of the superorganism of machines: the anti-values of money, the life-killing properties of energetic weapons, the ethic degradation and increasing madness provoked by fictions and myths and hate-speeches delivered by mass-media and the sloth and obsolescence of man to the new robotic blue collar workers andintegrative’ cell, more reproduced machine, the transport machine, now being robotized in multiple forms, the future top predator on Earth.
And so what maters is the physical economy, which produces real goods, not the financial economy, which should be submissive to the physical economy. Since money is the nervous language which the ‘brain of society’, our governments, should produce, using it to cre(dit)ate and produce the goods of the previous ethonomic frame of reference, which are the goods that people demand. And so a real democracy would nationalize the financial system, and create credit for ‘free’, as all languages are created at null cost, to direct scientifically the re=production of the previous frame of ‘positive human goods’, creating a paradise on Earth, as European Social democracies were trying to do.
Since man has a biological will, fundamental to understand concepts such as happiness, property, and Freedom, which require the pursuit of that biological will, that fulfills our nature. So natural property is that property which caters to our biological will. Freedom is the capacity to achieve that will. And happiness the state of a man that has reached his will as a biological species.
So Freedom is the capacity to obtain those goods, which fulfill our drives of existence and make us happy – Freedom to choose our food, education, our social reproduction (love), freedom to be human. And this lead salso to a new way of studying economics as the science that maximizes the will of man creating those welfare goods we need to feed, reproduce, learn and evolve socially.
The 3+1 ages of History, the 3+1 humn sub-species.
In that regard, a human organism is the basic unit-cell of the social organisms of history. And History is the superorganism of the homo sapiens species between its birth as a Homo Sapiens Neanderthal (two species,) that went through 3 ages, the young, energetic Palaeolithic where the Homo ‘visual’, dominated and the 2nd age of reproductive information, when women and the homo sapiens, verbal dominant in time-logic (our language words, is the language of human temporal information expressed with verbs, the visual language is common to animals), and finally a 3rd age, in which we evolve metal and biome again visual.
To understand those ages, common to all species, a key concept is that of speciation in two forms, natural to all creative processes of the Universe: The diversification of a single species occurs normally in two speciations – one specialized in energy and the other in information that recombine increasing the ‘latitude’ of energy and information of the 3rd, evolve form.
So we have the trinity of races, departing from an original homo sapiens: human energetic Sapiens Neanderthal (white men), informative sapiens sapiens (yellow men) and reproductive, sensorial combination (black men). And the trinity of genders: energetic male, informative women and their combination (gay sex). And the trinity of characters (athletic, dominant in blood system), picnic, dominant in informative system and tall (informative dimension) and viscerotonic, dominant in vegetative systems, and wide.
Of the many dualities of languages, the simplest one is between informative languages with maximal vowels, proper of the ‘homo sapiens, sapiens’, smaller, with more developed languages and brain regions for speech (brachycephalic, African and Asian) and energetic languages with maximal consonantal phonemes (white man, Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, Semitic languages, Caucasus languages).
And between logic languages based in the 3-dimensions of the light mind and verbal, temporal language, which orders for humans, the actions of our selves as players of the game.