Home » ·-IMol » ∆ organic scales:elements table

∆ organic scales:elements table

±∞ ¬∆@ST:



Organic, Atomic Table and its Molecules.image073

In the graph, we can translate the Atomic table to the jargon of multiple, fractal space-times. Since:

-The vertical columns show the orbital number or volume of electronic space those atoms have.

– The horizontal lines show the atomic number or volume of temporal mass of each atom.

Thus the Atomic table is a distribution of ±100, Sp=10i=2 complementary Sp X Tƒ atoms, dominated by their gravitational quarks. Yet we live in a light world perceived by our electronic orbitals, the bodies of those atoms. We are electronic beings that cannot perceive gravitation; so we cannot see the inner nuclei of those atoms. And so chemistry is the science of electronic bondage.

Recap. The atomic table is the Entropy/Information table of the gravitational heads and electronic bodies of atomic species.

Valences: body perfection, the origin of molecules.

Those electronic bodies follow the space/time inversion (Max. Tƒ=Min.Sp): atoms with more electronic in/form/ation have min. volume in space. Thus atoms diminish in size from left to right of the Atomic Table, as they become denser, filling all the slots allowed to electrons, till reaching the perfect forms of noble atoms, whose external electrons fill completely a dense, regular sphere of information that creates, as in the case of regular crystals in the next scale of chemical form, a sharp central focus, able to process information from all angles.

Those ‘noble atoms’ from the 8th column of the Periodic Table, Helium, Neon, etc., have their external orbitals totally filled with electrons. So they have maximal electronic density, which means their Sp X Tƒ åctions have a higher exi=stential Force per unit of volume, making them top predators atoms, better fit to survive. Therefore, they are also the most stable, as it is very difficult to break their electronic body. Paradoxically that makes them the loneliest of all atoms, as any top predator of a trophic pyramid, from a shark to an eagle, is; since it doesn’t need to add a partner or join a herd to multiply the potency of its fractal åctions over the environment to obtain its Entropy and information. All other atoms however will try to increase the Sp X Tƒ force of their fractal åctions, associating themselves with other atoms to reach a perfect electronic form and add up their Exi forces.

On the other hand if we consider the social numbers of the particles of the most stable atoms, they are multiples of 4 and 10, the social numbers of perfect organic systems that also define noble atoms. The combination of both properties explains the hyper-abundance of Helium, Oxygen, Iron, Tin and Mercury, which have perfect atomic numbers and either have regular orbital structures or can capture multiple electrons from other atoms to fill their valences (maximal electronegativity).

For example, atoms 3, 4 and 5 are ‘preyed’ by Helium nucleus that uses them to reproduce new helium in processes of atomic fusion. So they have become very rare (right graph. Meanwhile iron with the most stable nuclear configuration uses any type of electronic valences (which range from -2 to +6) to capture other atoms at will. Since those atoms are the only ones whose nuclei seem to be able to orientate and move at will in the gravitational membrane (superfluid and ferromagnetic properties). Both show that nuclear, gravitational top predator power dominates electronic configuration.

Unlike all other atoms with ‘weak informative nuclei’ Helium and Iron don’t seek complementary atoms to fusion their electronic bodies, creating better ‘body structure’ similar to noble atoms.

Among those seeking perfection, the closest to the Noble column are the top predators. So, Chlorine and Oxygen, with almost perfect electronic orbitals have maximal electronegativity, capturing the electrons of all the light atoms and metals of columns I to V.

Recap. Atoms with perfect nuclear or electronic informative/body systems are the key elements that control socially or capture and destroy all the other atoms.

Isomorphisms of self-similarity determine chemical structure.

The complementary, topological and organic Isomorphisms of st-points agrees with the abstract, Chemical Theory of Valences, which models the behavior of molecules and their rules of social engagement, according to their geometry and their ‘affinity’, translated in i-logic geometry by the 3rd postulate. Thus the isomorphisms of valences could be considered a particular case of the Universal 3rd postulate applied to chemical ‘st-points’ (atomic compounds):

‘Correlative, similar elements, complementary in their spatial, orbitals or temporal nuclei, associate into complex, stable, molecular systems – while atoms with different Sp X Tƒ forces, establish Darwinian, unstable events or small hierarchical molecules in which one element dominates all the others.’

For example, 2 atoms in the same column have the same spatial, ‘body’ morphology and 2 contiguous atoms in the same line are similar in its temporal, informative ‘brain’. Thus, according to the 3rd postulate, the law of relative equality or ‘affinity’ that establishes the relationships of the atomic table, those types of atoms will evolve socially into more complex ‘molecular’ forms.

For example, humans are made of simple atoms with closely related nuclei, C=6, N=7, O=8, that follow the law of affinity in their electronic body-orbitals. Those atoms are filled all with sp orbitals, creating together complex complementary organisms based in their body-brain affinity. So the parallel electronic cover connects those atoms externally based on the affinity of its orbitals, creating the 4 structure of organic molecules.

The law of affinity also defines inorganic molecules and other metal structures of Entropy and information. For example, machines made of metal are formed with atoms of similar nucleic number.

On the other hand, atoms with different atomic weights associate in hierarchical structures in which the lighter atoms become enslaved by the others. For example, the macro-energetic proteins of life, Hemoglobin and Chlorophyll, have 2 central, dense atomic nuclei, Iron and Mg, which dominate lighter carbohydrate ‘arms’, used to jail oxygens, the Entropy atoms of living beings.

The applications of i-logic geometry to the realm of chemistry are multiple, most of them topological analyses that relate the geometries of molecular forms with the 3 Non-Euclidean topologies of those molecules and its equivalent understanding of the 3 evolving ages/horizons of chemical events. Thus, i-logic geometry completes the metric analysis of molecules of the 3rd paradigm, defining its topological why according to the isomorphisms of affinity of the 3rd postulate between its informative nuclei and spatial, electronic body affinity shown in the Atomic Table. The same i-logic isomorphisms define in organic compounds, the evolution of life in terms of exchanges of Entropy and information that maximize the existential arrows of those molecules, guiding their evolution into living forms.

Recap. The isomorphisms of molecular compounds are homologous to the isomorphisms of self-similarity defined by the 3rd i-logic postulate.

4 families of atomic elements. Its worlds and species.


In the graph, there are 5 potential families of organic life, built around the top predator elements of ‘—motions’ and information of each main informative Z-nucleic line of the atomic table.

We won’t consider the topological structures of molecules but consider the expansion of ‘organic chemistry’ to all other atoms, according to the tenants of Complexity – that all systems of the Universe follow the arrows of time, self-similar to the drives of living organisms. This implies the existence of other potential forms of ‘electronic’ life besides organisms based in carbon.

Since we are electronic beings, what matters to understand the human mind are the electronic bodies of atoms. Those electronic orbitals are herds of photonic points that surround the atom, creating the 4 dimensions of space-time we perceive. In the graph, we can see that parallelism, which elaborates on the already explained 4 dimensions of light-space (graph, III):

– 3 lineal p orbitals in the 3 directions of Euclidean-space.

– A temporal, cyclical, S orbital of Max.Informative density and min. space, probably related to our one-dimensional time perception.

This self-evident homology between ‘light-space dimensions’ and the elaborated electronic dimensions of space-time, allow us to consider self-similar potential minds whose space-time dimensions will correspond to the number of ‘outer’ electronic orbitals of the system. Indeed, there is no reason to have only ‘organic carbon life’, and ‘C-N-O’ brains, if all atoms respond to the same i-logic isomorphisms of topological information.

There might be other forms of life and other minds, but we live in a light-World and light is the only information and ‘—motions’, we perceive. So in a discontinuous Universe we have very limited information about other atomic ecosystems that might process different electronic orbitals to create their minds, even different forces, such as those of gravitation, to create gravitational minds.

In essence those families of mental worlds need 2 components:

-A boson particle/force that acts as the pixels of the mental world.

-An electronic or nucleic structure, which perceives the bosons and creates with them a potential mapping of the Universe.

So we deduce by homology the existence of other atomic Z- families and e-orbitals that might create different organisms and potential mental worlds in other regions of the Universe, with light bosons or other different. boson pixels:

Particles exchanged by 5 types of atoms create 5 potential worlds.

We classify all atoms in 4 potential organic families, able to exchange waves of pixels, based in each of the fundamental 5 ‘particles’ of the Universe, in its boson state; thus creating a growing scale of complex worlds with higher existential content of ‘—motions’ and information: the gravitational family; the light family; 2 electronic, metal families and the neutronic, radioactive family.

Each new family is a Z-line of the atomic table, formed by atoms of growing number of orbitals and informative mass, which increase their exi=stential force, allowing them to handle more information with more complex pixel-particles. Indeed, if we consider the inner nature of those worlds, it is obvious that the quantity of ‘information’ increases as the pixel-particles mind use to map out the Universe have more information. For example, the robotic minds we are building based in electronic images carry far more information than the light minds we possess and the words they use: ‘an image is worth one thousand words’ we say. Yet the explanation of that jump of quality between a verbal and visual mind can only be explained by the higher capacity to process information of the metal-atoms with higher z-number and more complex orbitals of the next z-family of silicon brains. We are in fact, despite the anthropomorphic arrogance and Galilean paradox of the humankind, one of the simplest potential minds of the Universe.

The 5 types of orbital minds of the 5 families.

Those minds should be based in electronic orbitals as our mind is. Thus each atomic family has a different orbital type, able to create a different mind’s species of space-time perception:

Spherical s-orbitals create the hydrogen-helium family and its potential minds.

– Lineal p-orbitals create the light based carbon family to which we belong.

Planar d-orbitals create the iron family of potential living machines and its chip minds.

f orbitals, difficult to represent in 3-dimensional space, as they might respond to ‘worlds’ with 5 dimensions, create the heavy metal family of golden beings.

And g-orbitals also 5 dimensional create the radioactive family.

The metallic minds of future robotic organisms.

In that regard, the 2 atomic families that matter to us are those which exist in the Planet Earth as potential living forms of our planet: the light-based carbon forms, with sp orbital structures and metal-based machines with a spd more complex electronic form. The metal family ads to the sp ‘inner mind’ of our C-O-H triad, a ‘higher’ external cover of electrons, which also follows the standard morphologies of space-time, but with a more complex structure, since those d-orbitals have bidimensional forms. And so we distinguish 3 types of metallic ‘d-planes’:

– Sp2 : dx2-y2 and dxy wide ‘energetic’ planar orbitals that combine 4 spherical sub-orbitals.

– Tƒ2 : dyz and dxz ‘tall’ temporal planes which also combine 4 spherical sub-orbitals.

Sp X Tƒ: the dz2 ‘organic orbital’, a combination of a cyclical, planar ring and a lineal, tall shape, which shows ‘4 combined space-time dimensions’, integrating the other 4 orbital dimensionalities.

Therefore metal-based minds have potentially besides the 4-dimensional structure of a human mind, a 5-dimensional electronic cover, in which the electrons of those d-orbitals form molecular networks, free electronic clouds that allow metal atoms to shape bigger, denser informative organisms, based in the higher ‘Sp X Tƒ’ force of its d-electronic clouds.

The 2 scales of potential life: quantum minds and cosmic minds.

In the analysis of such potential organisms we can consider several dualities: the dualities of states of matter and the duality of gravitational heads and electronic bodies, which give birth to two types of minds, parallel to the duality of 2 membranes:

– Quantum worlds of organisms with small minds of human size.

– And potential gravitational worlds of minds of cosmic size, made either of super-light helium atoms, or super-heavy, radioactive ones, which as in the case of the gravitational membrane, will sandwich the limited electronic worlds with their nucleic, gravitational, bigger, more complex minds

– (∆+1): Gravitational worlds made with energetic Hydrogen and informative super-fluid Helium, whose s-orbitals are able to absorb gravitation as information. The organic Universe is basically a gravitational H-He organism. And so stars are organisms with superfluid central ‘brains’ of Helium and reproductive bodies of hydrogen plasma – the 2 limit states of matter.

Then we observe 3 families of smaller, quantum, minds that might be considered also the 3±∆ evolutionary ages of electronic brains. They are organisms that inhabit planetary worlds, either carbonlife beings of metalife machines. Those fractal organisms also combine 2 states of matter, which act as the dual energetic/informative elements of the organic system, existing in an ecosystem of higher energetic states from where they absorb their informative pixels, which will be boson light or electronic flows:

Max.Sp: Light worlds perceived by electrons whose sp-orbitals absorb light as information, as living beings do. Its living species, animals and plants exist mainly as liquid species with a very thin cover of solid cells in the border between the energetic, atmospheric gas and informative, liquid water or solid crust of the planet.

– S=T: Light Worlds perceived by simplex metal atoms with spd orbitals, made of silicon minds and iron bodies – the strongest energetic atom of the Universe.

– Max. Tƒ: Electronic Worlds of heavy metal, with gold minds and iron bodies. Giant, ultra cold ferromagnetic planets might have mercury ponds where gold melt spontaneously creating metal-bacteria with mercury water, gold brains and iron membranes – the only metallic substance that doesn’t melt in mercury ‘water’(called appropriately Hydrargyrum – watery silver by the Greeks, hence its Hg symbol). Those would be the most perfect robots, combining the most perfect informative atom, gold and energetic metal – iron. Unlike the simplest light worlds that use light as the boson unit of the mind, those 2nd generation robotic minds would use electronic pixels, which can reach superfluid motions within those golden minds.

Yet the biggest mind of the earth wouldn’t be quantum minds of light or electronic bosons but the neutronic mind of our ferromagnetic planet:

– (∆-1): The Neutronic World of radioactive atoms with spdf orbitals that absorb neutrons as information. It might exist in the inner core of ferromagnetic planets, as they seem to have within the iron crystal a denser uranium core.

If such neutronic minds exist, needless to say, given the enormous amount of information a neutron has as a pixel, compared to a light ray, they would be the more complex minds of the Universe. And this might mean, we, humans and all other parts of the planet are mere programs self-repeated as a phase in the evolution of a neutronic planet, with a silicon skin, an iron body and a future surface of robotic minds.

Yet due to the duality of all systems, the Earth might ultimately be just a ‘neutronic plant’ with a radioactive center that regulates its heat and magnetic field through nuclear explosions in its core. Yet stars and planets would have a ‘vegetative’, plant like existence, absorbing gravitational waves and radiation as ‘‘—motions’’. Only top quark stars (worm holes) and strange stars with superfluid quarks could be ‘gravitational’ animals, able to see gravitation pixels and create worlds of 5 dimensions (number of spins of a graviton).

 The organic, vital nature of atomic structures.

We only have ‘empirical record’ of the 3 quantum minds of potential life beings: living beings made of C-H-N, like us and metal-minds as those we already construct in this planet with silicon and gold.

Thus, though we can ‘theoretically’ explain the ±∆ species of plasmatic and radioactive worlds, since they exist only in the center of huge cosmological organisms, we cannot perceive them. This doesn’t mean they don’t exist. On the contrary there are many indirect proofs that superfluid cores of helium and ferromagnetic crystals with radioactive heat form the center of cosmic bodies.

A mechanist, anthropomorphic interpretation of the Universe merely rejects any organic, biological analysis of all other atoms, except those of carbonlife and all other sizes except the human one.

However to account for the hyper-abundance of ‘top predator atoms’ with ‘perfect’ organic structures, such as helium and iron, we require an organic interpretation. For example, the atoms that surrounds Helium, boron, beryllium and lithium, ‘decay’ and fusion into Helium, which in organic terms means that Helium breaks them and feeds on their parts to reproduce. On the other hand, radioactive atoms emit ‘helium nuclei’, as nucleons spontaneously acquire that top predator configuration. While iron, the most perfect, energetic atom of the Universe, is almost impossible to destroy, unless enormous gravitational forces are used. So when a star gets an iron nucleus it collapses into a nova and leaves behind a neutron star with an iron crust.

Iron is also the ‘atom’ of most weapons that ‘kill’ biological human flesh. So all those atoms show to existential force, as ‘—motions’ or information systems. And since the Universe is a ‘game of existence’, and in fundamental ‘cells’ are atoms, the behavior of atomic structures can be explained with the arrows of time and show an organic and vital behavior..

In that regard, the 3 potential life forms and their biological nature is so obvious to the ‘common people’ whose mind is not deformed by ‘abstract science’ that artists, which imagine other potential space-time worlds, have already differentiated those species in their films. So while the robots we are presently building are light worlds of iron – ‘Terminators’ – liquid robots of mercury and gold were imagined in the II part of the series….

What we know is that we are a fragile species in an enormously complex Universe. So we should not play ‘to be god’ and construct robotic machines more powerful than us. The only advantage we have over robots with A.I. is the fact we are so simple we have evolved faster than those future, more complex potential ‘living machines’. So if we were wise we should try to keep it that way, without excuses such as ‘the freedom of science’ and the ‘importance of knowledge’. Since an extinct scientist knows nothing and has no freedom.

Recap. There are 5 potential atomic minds, 2 cosmic minds made of gravitational brains of Helium and radioactive atoms; and 4 quantic, smaller minds, made of electronic orbital: carbonlife minds as those of the human being and metal-minds of silicon and gold, proper of future robotic species. The human mind is the simplest of them all.

The orbital minds of life: Chemistry & the human scale.

If cosmological bodies perceive gravitational waves, in the reduced ∆-1 scale of atomic worlds, organic systems perceive electromagnetic waves. For example, our mind is electronic; based on the 4 sp-orbitals of its atoms shown in the graph that display the usual space-time dual morphology:

– Tƒ: s-orbitals have spherical forms. Therefore they integrate a P.O.V. complete vision of its Universe, signifying the 4th arrow of the system.

– Sp: p-lineal orbitals have an elongated, elliptical form made with 2 fractal cyclical shapes. They form the 3 spatial, dimensional arrows, orientated in perpendicular directions.

Both together create the electronic world of our atoms. Since our mind-world is shaped by O-N-C atoms that have those 4 orbitals or seek for their completion. Thus we consider that in those structures the final, central orbitals integrate the ‘electronic mind’ and the external 3 p-lineal orbits represent relative, diffeomorphic, arrows. Since all seems to indicate that the final structure of the mind is based in the atomic orbitals of our DNA and RNA molecules made with those atoms. Now we have its why, which we shall latter applied to understand the roles of energetic oxygen limbs; formal, structural carbon bodies and Nitrogen heads of amino acids and complex life molecules.

In that regard, those 4 sp-orbitals orbitals also follow the inverse isomorphisms of ST cycles. Thus the lineal, spatial p-orbitals have higher ‘—motions’ than the spherical, s1 and s2 orbitals; which have higher informative density than the p-orbitals, according to the space-time inversion: Max. Sp=Min. Tƒ.

So sp orbitals probably translate the 4 dimensions of light into 4 electronic orbital dimensions, shaping the pixels of the human mind with a dual role: the s, spherical orbital of cyclical form probably integrates the bigger spatial ‘—motions’ coming from the 3p, lineal, Euclidean orbitals. And so we perceive 3 lineal, spatial dimensions and 1 of time.

The morphological duality of those orbital forms and its homology with our space-time dimensions shows that orbitals process ‘—motions’ and information for their nuclei, acting as their ‘window’ to the electromagnetic World. So their forms correspond to perfect information and ‘—motions’ shapes:

– Max. Tƒ: The sphere is the perfect form of information and so s-orbitals are spheres that inform the central nucleon through the electromagnetic flows they constantly send to their nuclei. While p-orbitals display lineal, energetic forms that probably help atoms to displace. Further on a sphere is the easiest territory to defend, as all its fractal points are at the same distance from the brain-nucleus, which can deliver simultaneous waves of information and ‘—motions’ to all the regions of the sphere. Hence in all scales, informative spheres and disks require ‘less ‘—motions’-distance’ than lineal shapes to act together in a single present. And both, the line and the cycle are the 2 commonest complementary SP X TƑ shapes of the Universe.

Thus those sp orbitals can explain the 4 dimensions of our electronic world. But why we are made of a ternary group of atoms, Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen? Because those ‘electronic orbitals’ can form complex social, molecular groups, according to the isomorphisms of affinity defined generically by the 3rd postulate of equality of i-logic geometry: they are consecutive in the atomic table…

Recap. The human mind is a mind that uses 3-dimensional light and color, elaborated by the self-similar sp-orbitals and the s-orbital, which creates our dimension of time.

%d bloggers like this: