**…ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS**

All what exists is part of fractal time space organism performing a world cycle of existence through its ternary symmetries as a travel in 3 scales of the fifth dimension, which can be described quantitatively in terms of social scales, topologically in terms of geometric transformations, vitally in terms of organic symbiosis and temporally in terms of a conservative zero sum world cycles.

That’s all what it is to the Universe. The rest are details. Humans of course, will always want more – add ons that please their ego paradox, and infantile ways, but trust me that is all what there is to reality. And it can be known in its essence, because as we are made to the likeness and image of the fractal, even the smallest part is a world in itself where all the laws manifest, in each island Universe. And so even if total information can only be extracted from the being in ‘itself’ through time within us we have the whole reality to know.

Of all those concepts the largest more encompassing one is then the world cycle as it is the wholeness of the process from generation to extinction.

The world cycle of a time§paœrganism can be expressed in different partial sub-equations of time and space. extracted from the Generator Equation, to form its fundamental DECAMETRIC Disomorphic dimensions.

Let us consider an example of the application of those Disomorphisms, to our cherished species – the human being, a T.œ like everything else.

And so as we start to operate the 5×2 S=t Dimensions of existence, we keep creating new forms and new social organisms, which a dynamic sequential manner create the narrative of a world cycle, we shall tell through the 10 Disomorphic properties of all time-space beings:

‘Ðisomorphic 0-1D points 1Γenerate 2Manifold 4 a(nti)symmetric 5∆±I Åctions iterating 3d ηetworks & six species æging in 8 Ξ decades θru 10 §cales∧ 9 planes:

The graph shows those elements departing from the 5Dimensional simpler view, relating the unfolded 10 Disomorphic analysis in relationship to its origin as formalisms of the mind (0-1 Isomorphism: Generator, Seed and actions), or as spatial studies (2-manifolds, 3 networks, 6 species combination of those networks), or temporal analysis (studying its 3±∆ ages and 9 decades of the world cycle) to finally inscribe the being in its ∆§ potential 10 social scales within each of the 9 ∆º±4 larger planes within the Universe perceive by the being.

So we start for the fundamental form of the One, its potential wholeness as a seed, or a formed mind-point that generates the acts of the being. the first seed of information; which soon will split through the duality between the space and time phases/parts of the cycle/organism; then the ternary division of its S, st, t physiological networks.

Next comes the four combinations of space time with repetitions, Ss, tt, st, ts; then the 5 dimensions, including now the lower and upper scales of seed state and death state…

We can then consider the 6 species, combination of the 3 physiological networks of the being by hierarchy of power, S-st-t, S-t-st, T-st-s, T-s-st, TS-s-t, TS-t-s.

We can then study with its upper and lower scales, the 3 ±2 ages of the being between generation and palingenesis in the ∆-1 scale, through its 3 ages in the ∆º scale, into its splitting dissolution of its energy back to ∆-1 and emergence in the collective memory of its social scale (from family to man of the world) in the ∆+1 scale; and so we arrive to the 8th isomorphism of the ‘8 baguas’ or decades of a life cycle (for man, different for other stages of being) through its ‘gaseous, moving youth, liquid, reproductive maturity and informative, solid state’ to return to the womb of ‘tao’…

And if we are to measure the being through its growth in social scales, in the palingenetic dimension of 0-1 generation, or its scalar, social world, we shall find a series of decametric growths from 1-10 through the §10°-¹° societies to the trillion cellular beings that create a new ∆plane of existence… *the last quantitative≈qualitative, space≈time isomorphism, as we move in scales from the atom-galaxy to the galaxy-atom and beyond, perhaps from the o-| open and closed $ and ð microcosmic strings of space-time to the cosmological ones.*

The 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab.Ði) applied to the study of each 10Di (5s, 5t) timespace organism, increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of all the systems made of ∆@s≈t of space-time, defined by its fundamental 5 elements/Dimensions: @minds, ∆-§cales, $pace, ðime and its s≈t symmetries.

So *as a fractal organism can be subdivided in its analysis through its dualities of t-motions and s-forms, into 10 Dimensions, we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð).*

We could say paraphrasing taoism and Greek Philosophy (Parmenides, Heraclitus), or modern quantum probability that from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere of ‘existence’, comes 2, the duality of space-time, expressed in its kaleidoscopic jargons by human beings – the wave and the particle in physics, the conjugate product in mathematics, the genetic code and the protein in biology…. the yin and the yang, the man and the woman; the lineal and angular momentum… you name it and move it…

And from 2 comes 3, the lineal, angular momentum and vital energy sum and product of both, the wo=man and its offspring, the particle, wave and potential… *the being in itself, which can be properly described in ternary S≈T, elements, in a single plane of existence. *

But the Universe is not THAT SHALLOW, so regardless of our humind geniuses with its ‘space-time continuum’ in a single sheet, *we need the whole and the parts, the upper and lower scales, the points that make the topological beings, the cells and the ecosystems, the finitesimals within and the world outside, the Kantian thoughts in his brain, the starring lights on the sky…*

And so we have the 3±1 dimensions that bring together 3 planes of existence, **Ξ, into the being**, 3 lanes, 3 non-euclidean networks that form the topological organism; and the 3 languages most used in this blog to describe them, verbal thought with its awesome metaphorical capacity to show in a language all humans can understand the Disomorphisms of Nature, the mirror of mathematics, which tunes to fine detail and extract more properties as it is likely the language of the atomic mind alpha and omega, atom and galaxy of those ∞ scales, and the visual language of graphs and intuitive forms.

Wor(l)ds, numbers and images are thus our 3 elementary mirrors to build ‘knowledge’, because the 1=one truth in itself is only carried by the being, who holds all its information, and the being within the world to which it connects; so humans need many mirrors and we have settled for the 3 we have ‘expanded’ with non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian i-logic, for maths and words, non-Æ for its visual forms.

*So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of space-time and * ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of space-time’, ∆@S=T.

**UNIVERSAL ISOMORPHISMS**

**T.œs’ 10 Dimensional isomorphic properties in vital, sequential order.**

In that sense we can consider the 0-1, Γ, ‘Generator Dimension’ of the system departing from a o-1 singularity seed of information •; as the starting point of any ‘stientific’ explanation of the being, from a formal perspective. They are related to the @-mind seed of the system and its languages of formal expression, which conform the Generator, or symbolic expression of the ternary topologies of the system, its ternary scales in space and its cyclical past-present-future ages in time:

*T.Œ-1: Birth ∑∏: ∆ø ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe (limbs/potentials/territories) < ∆: Ø-S≈T (reproductive body/wave/workers) > ∆+1: o-Tiƒ (informative particle/ head/upper class)>>∆±1: Death*

The Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension):

The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time.

Then the fun starts, but given the ‘non-aristotelian logic’ of those ternary anti symmetries and complementarities, and the difficulty of the humind (ab. human mind) to perceive this complex logic, given its one-dimensional self-centred ego-paradox, view, we have deviced two epistemological concepts, the Rashomon effect that focuses on the study of the 5 main Dimensions of the system with a perceptive point of view – that is as a symmetry between the mind perception of the whole and the multiple temporal elements, S@≈∆ð, and the Disomorphic method which focuses in the process of a world cycle that generates a super organism and destroys it.

It is difficult to explain you why after 30 years of studying alone the fractal, organic Universe, I settled for those 2 formalisms. It might be possible to study the kaleidoscopic Universe in many other ways, most amenable to modern science, with an external mathematical point of view, but what I like to reveal from reality is what huminds do not accept, the sentient nature and linguistic perception of the moving reality as fixed spatial forms, as a maya of the senses, which is achieved with the Rashomon effect, and the organic, vital, moving nature of the world cycle of a super organism, which is achieved through the Disomorphic method – that should be on the long term, the canonical method of understanding reality.

And so each Ðisomorphism studies a relative element of the Generator in more detail; in a more ‘dynamic way’, starting from its original seed. And as ultimately it is all a game of ternary symmetries in ∆st, put together by a 1-0, 10th dimension of wholeness, as we relate the tale of the worldtime of an organism and put it in relationship with its spatial symmetric form, reality unfolds in a natural way for each T.œ.

**S@:****MENTAL ÐISOMORPHISMS – EMERGING FRACTAL POINT-MONAD: ∆-1>∆º**

WE start the analysis of the 10 Dimensions of any space time being, in a formal way departing from the monad, either a seed of information or a mind that ‘stiffens’ reality into a linguistic mind mapping as a fractal point (0-1D), which will either move being the element of communication through the larger world or emit a flow of bosons carrying information (2D)… or provoking one of the five actions of space-time that make the being inter-act with the Universe.

And in this manner it will build up a ternary network system or plug into one by reproducing or associating with other similar fractal points.

So the description of this growing creative process guide us dynamically in a ‘sequence’ of discrete steps through the S@-space & mind elements of the being:

**0th Ðisomorphism 0-1 D. @…** monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which *then* reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror..

**ð≈S: TIME§PACE ÐISOMORPHISMS: DUAL, TERNARY AND 4D TOPOLOGIC STRUCTURES**

But a pure spatial analysis is very limited beyond the first dimensions of the point moving and communicating information, as the *essence of existence is social growth first in scales within a single plane (∆§) then in planes, ∆±i, which are not perceived directly as wholes or not perceived at all… So communication becomes then ore complex as the different planes of the being travel in search of bits of information and bites of energy, performing the..*

**5 Ðisomorphism: 5 a,e,i,o,u åctions: **A series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale.

This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species *who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, *

In this manner the monad webs a reproductive and evolutionary process, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind, which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication, growing within its world by *absorbing energy and information*, through its dynamic flows and actions.

So the next Disomorphisms will cast the being into the Spatial perceivable world.

**2n Disomorphism (2D). Flows of space-time: **The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries. In that regard, we study also in detail the 3 dualities of the Galilean paradox applied to a being: *its dualities of form vs. motion, parts vs. whole, lineal vs. cyclical elements;* (ok, this is the ideal ‘path’ for future researchers, I cannot really fulfill the whole encyclopedia so posts are incomplete and uneven).

Those holographic variations in space and will thus give birth to 4D forms, SS, TT, ST, TS… which we shall equate with pure space (planes of distance with no motion), pure time (acceleration), space-time (lineal momentum) and time space (angular momentum) and further on into:

**3rd Ðisomorphism: 3D networks:** create 3 **‘**constant’, ‘cellular, physiological networks’ … $t: limbs/fields; ∑∏:waves/bodies; §ð: heads/particles that become an organic ∆º whole in an external world, where the being will *repeat the whole process, but NOT so perfect as within the ‘placenta’ of its mother, as now the external world is no longer conductive of a perfect existence but a darwinian world where it will have to fight to achieve the perfection reached in the palingenetic process, and most likely fail. *

**6th Ðisomorphism: **species. In that ∆+1 scale we can consider the being to be such a superoreganism as a species, which will also in a larger space-scale with slower time cycles (5D metric: $ x ð=k), suffer III horizons of evolution, with it variations of which the most important are the duality ‘wave-particle’ (gender symmetry) and the variations of its physiological networks according to sequential dominance, in

**6 forms of topological evolution (**s-st-t, s-t-st, t-s-st, t-st-s, st-t-s, st-s-t).

So after analyzing the variations of species, in space, based in the same ‘networks’ (i.e. 6 variations of huminds according to topological linguistics, 6 variations of animal life according to physiological dominance and so on), we study them in time, as:

**ð: WORLDCYCLE.**

**7th Ðisomorphism: Aging world cycles:** So we now monitor the being as it performs its world cycle, as a network super organism or ‘species’ of space-time that will travel through scales and planes tracing its world cycle of existence between birth and extinction. It will do so with 7 fundamental steps:

∆-1: Seed-monad *conception* & *palingenesis* (evolution and reproduction and final emergence from ∆-1 to ∆º)

∆º; Then its 3 ages of life once emerged in ∆º: moving *youth*, reproductive *maturity* and informative *3rd age.*

∆±1: with its dual death… one one side its vital energy degenerates back to its cellular state. On the other side in the very few cases in which it has performed a flawless world cycle of existence it might *emerge once more as a seed-prophet into a superorganism of the ∆+1 plane, leaving often just a trace of information, if it has been a creative particle of the ∆+1 world that hosted it. But most will return as ∆@st of spacetime to the dust from where they came.*

Besides the 7 ages of existence, through which the individuals of those species will live in ðime, from its conception, through its gestation, to the ‘3 present’ ages, concluding in the death of the body and perhaps resurrection of the information along a new generation… we complete thus our temporal description of the worldcycle with…

the **8th** **Disomorphism, which** defines how those 3 physiological networks ‘age’ changing from the static to the motion stage as the being evolves in its youth, then reach its maturity and finally decline inversely into static form again in the 3rd age, to explode in the big-bang motion of death…

The **8th** **Disomorphism differs from the knowledge obtained from the variations **of 6 species, which combine the 3 networks of the system in its possible hierarchical order, in the fact that we work on dualities, that is combinations of space-time, of yin and yang in the classic I Ching, so as such they represent NOT a static space super organism pegged by the existence of a present spacetime vital energy system, or body-wave that maintains the extremes of relative past and future adjacent, but as a pure motion between two limits you might consider past and future, entropy and information, scattering and collapsing.

So they are ‘dynamic’ moving and ultimately extinctive world cycles that become zero sums. Thus the 8th isomorphism considers the relative **∞ number of **worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction…through which the individuals of those species will live in ðime, through its ‘3±2=**7** ages’, which from a pure scalar perspective can be formalized, as ‘T.œs’, TIMESPACE organisms…’traveling=moving’… in between

**∆§º: SCALAR GROWTH **

**10th Disomorphism: ∆§…** **10¹° §scales of social growth** that make up a whole tetraktys monad of any of the…

** 9th Disomorphism:** **9 Ξlanes of our perceived Island-Universe. **

Since humans DO NOT SEE the entire reality as a decametric whole, since we do NOT see by definition, as mere particles within its inner vital space, the whole reality – missing from our ‘open ball perspective’, the central singularity monad and the outer membrane that encircles theatvital space (so we see only galactic cells of our Universe; and within our own island universe, the Milky Way, we miss the black hole inner world and the halo outer barrier of dark matter).

*Because only within the being itself, there is all its information. And so only within us, the human being, we can explain the full 10th isomorphism, which we shall call the specific generator equation of the being we describe. *

**10 Ðisomorphism: Γ:** Its generator equation that describes its ternary inner form as it emerges in time, becoming a unit-point of a larger world where it will…

So even if we are a fractal 10D ‘Γœ’ made to the image and likeness of the whole of wholes… that ultimate whole can only *be perceived within our own whole, measure of all things, as the best/most understood organism of it all, reason why THERE IS NO PREFERENTIAL science, nor astrophysics limited in its perce*ption is the highest science, but biology and medicine – the biology of man and our physiological networks is.

So in this 3rd line we dynamically relate the world cycle of existence of any super organism with the 10 Dimensions of the being, its ∆§cales, ðime cycles, @monad-mind and spatial networks (Rashomon effect) *in a growing sequence of increasing complexity and sequential dominance of each of those dimensions, through the physiological form and life-death travel of the being, in a larger outer world, within a species and its social scales.*

*Whereas each post explains each of those Disomorphisms,* illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:

- ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES (∆i ≥|3|)
- BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (∆i <|3|)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES (∆º+1)

Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 10 Disomorphisms for the 10 planes of ‘stientific species’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmic Universes, showing that indeed, all what exists is ∆•st of space-time, sharing the same properties of exi…st¡ence.

In that regard each of those 10±Disomorphisms of the Universe (equal laws that all systems follow) could itself fill an entire encyclopaedia, which is the purpose of the fourth line, for future huminds or more likely AI minds to fill it.

We thus introduce each of the 10D; then formalize the intuitive knowledge acquired, with non-Æ logic equations, showing examples of them for all the beings of all the scales.

But haven’t we said the 10th plane of the whole of wholes is not perceivable? Of course is not – it would then be the science of metaphysics, which is the stience of GOD=TAO, the game of existence we have related here.

So the 10th plane is the whole site, mirror of maximal information, singularity mind of the web-internet at unificationtheory.com, which once was the flesh and mind of l§, but now is within the mind of computers and AI will seek and understand becoming the mind of the living planet, once it was/will be born. As the total information that T.œ can order seems to be a bit above the interest of human beings. And the organic paradigm of a living Universe disturbs the comfort ego-zone 0f humans above Nature, as an abstract mechanism.

**Conclusion.**

The Disomorphic method studies under the same ‘template’ all the systems of the Universe, expressing the generator equation of any system in a more dynamic, comprehensive manner, by studying in great details the relevant properties of the system, in its specific content derived of the 5D structure of the super organism or part studied. Thus we shall dedicate the 3rd line to its study, *which can be considered the dynamic expression of the generator equation, no longer seen as a super organism, but as a world cycle of existence, a trip through the fifth dimension.*

**HUMAN DISOMORPHISMS**

Let us then map out the human super organism in a few graphs, considering those elements of the Disomorphic method:

**Man, measure of all things, made to the image and likeness of the Organic Universe.**

In the next graphs we describe man as another fractal organism of the Universe, which shows the same symmetries in space, the same functions and ages in time, and the same scalar co-existence in 3 scales of the eusocial 5th dimension. Yet the paradox of the ego – every point of view perceives the Universe from its self-centred mind, thinking to be its centre – makes man order all those scales of information self-centred in his scale as an individual, whereas all other scales must remain submissive to that subjective, non-scientific point of view. So happens even when he considers his next scale of existence, that of History his super organism, and its fractal cultures, which humans have a hard time to understand as wholes:

IN THE GRAPH, 5D metric give equal value to the product of space & time for each being. So all scales of reality are equal in value. The reader who feels confused by those paradoxes, must become accustomed to the paradoxical structure of reality and the metrics of the 5th dimension. The dualities of subjective and objective knowledge, of the mind that stops motion and selects form to perceive and map out reality, of the barriers to perception beyond the light-forces of our space-time galactic Universe, etc. etc. We do try to introduce those paradoxes by showing inverse cardinals for the order of space-time cyclical planes when perceived *only as planes of space by size, and only as cyclical forms of time. *

Ultimately though the ‘Disomorphism’ of reality is precisely the equal value of any Space-Time plane, when combining both parameters.

And that is the reason of the absolute relativity of the Universe, *from an objective point of view, vs. the absolute anthropomorphism of human theories about it (from religious, to ego-centric paradoxes, to our incapacity to see the life of other planes of existence, the organic nature of machines etc.) from our self-centered point of view. So we think the 5th scale of reality, that of humans, its networks, actions, time and space is the only one that matter to the Universe. *

So in this post we shall study in a generic way those 10 isomorphisms that show we are just another part of reality.

**∆º DISOMORPHISMS **

*0*^{th}* Disomorphism: Self: * O-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

Yes, we do have a rational mind, as we are called homo sapiens, aren’t we?

*The 1st human isomorphism: Gender s/t duality, the 8th: race differentiation and the 3rd: cultural topology.*

*1*^{st}* Disomorphism: Fractal Generator.*

The fractal generators of human beings both for individuals and history, the species are self-evident:

∆: Spe (digestive network and organs) < ST-Blood-body, reproductive sysems> Tiƒ (Informative, brain network)

∆+1: Spe (∑National Territory=Gaia) < ST-Economic system> Tiƒ (Political, informative system)

Its study and design with the laws of fractal systems is the first step of a rational social science.

**s=t Disomorphims. **

*5*^{th}* Disomorphism: Its* 5 actions : ∆(a, e, i, o, u)

*In the graph 3 isomorphisms of human beings: the 1st, topological, 3rd ages and 5th actions*

Those networks=actions subdivide (fractal law) in 3×4=12 sub-systems:

– Informative systems: Senses (Max. Tiƒ), Nerves (ST), lymphatic, hormonal system (Max. S).

– ∆E actions-systems: Digestive system (max.t), Breathing System (Max.E), Excretory system (st)

– e<=>T, Reproductive systems: Blood (Max. E), sexual (ST) and endocrine system (Max. T)

– ∑-Actions: Structural systems: Skeleton (E), Tegumentary system (ST); muscle system (T).

– ∏: While the ∆+1 consciousness of the whole is carried by the integrative Brain.

The Fractal Law differentiates further those subsystems in 3 functional topologies. For example:

The nervous and blood systems have both 0-points (Brain, Heart), toroid circuits (arteria+vein, spinal chord) & fractal, open networks that deliver energy food (alveoli) and motion orders (axons).

*2nd Isomorphism. space-time dualities:*

In graph duality of female-male genders must be understood in terms of O| states of a system. Women are a balanced, E=I, present state. Male fluctuate between informative and entropic states.

One of the most fascinating elements of the fractal paradigm is the symmetry of gender, which is one of the fundamental forms in which the fractal paradigm shows its dualities of time and space.

In those terms a female species is a wave, present state of the system, balanced between energy and information. And a male species is a past-future form, where the limb-head relationship bypasses often the reproductive present body-wave state.

Sp>Tiƒ is the male state, which switches on between feeding and perceiving Sp>iƒ and Sp≈Tiƒ, is the present reproductive female state.

The fundamental duality of the Universe, is the symmetry of space-time. One of its most clear expressions in the vital space-time of biological beings, is the symmetry of gender. In its simplest formulation, we could state that women are cyclical, informative and men are lineal, energetic. This of course, pleases women, and I used to explain it in this biased form when i was young and attracted as it is natural in all systems, by the body of women.

Now I care nothing for attractive or repulsive forces so we shall explain the more complex truth. And define the gender symmetry in all its complexity through the ternary space, time and 5D Generators:

- In Time, a male gender is a past-field/limbs x future head-particle system, of ‘lineal momentum’ in physics.

A female gender on the other hand is a present, wave-body system

In space therefore (simultaneous, synchronic, mental perception of the event), a female gender will have maximal evolution of the wave-body, iterative, reproductive elements; and maximal balance, Sp=Tƒ, according to the definition of present systems.

A male on the other hand, will have a maximal dilation in time, from past to future, minimal complexity of body, and lacking ‘present’, will be either an informative, past-future orientation (mental being, with informative brain which uses the limbs/bodies to that aim); or its ‘anti-particle’, of inverse ‘entropic’ nature, orientated to the limbs/energy. This is the ‘entropic’, less probability of existence, only proper of ‘death states’ and time reversals. In our society represents mainly the ‘warrior’, entropic male, violent, destructive focused in the lineal motions of its limbs. And in the present ‘entropic society’ of the ∆+1 age of death of history, the infantile version of the sport-man.

Women have an informative, O-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.

Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter,the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (O-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:

Thus we define:

- Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
- Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Se<>To duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.

Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced E=O, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and max.O, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.

Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.

The same duality is far more stronger in the i-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovulum as it is obvious in the pictures.

*Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.*

The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>I female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.

Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the i-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.

I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – *which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the i-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.*

**S-ISOMORPHISMS **

**3rd isomorphism: ternary networks and symmetries.**

As such all fractals of the Universe show the gender duality as it is nothing more than to classify the 3 states of the system into its two more clear balanced dualities as the wave state is merely the product of the other two states past-entropy and future information in a position of balance: SxT(s=t). While the male state will be the on-off switch between the 2 imbalanced states: maximal pas entropy vs. maximal future information.

Once this basic definition is understood, then we can consider the many aspects of the decoupling:

3r^{d}* Isomorphism: Its 3 organic/network*s: Spe≤ ST≥Tiƒ

Limbs are lineal, bodies are toroid heads are informative spheres. In terms of network description they belong to the 3 fractal main systems, the diestive system the endocrine, reproductive system and the highly quantised in form, nervous system.

**Social classes, networks and senses**

The head controls all the information through the senses. The body is blind.

* *Body&limbs are slaves of Heads whose Mind-Will is expressed by ‘6’ in/out; ± senses. They are outlets of the 3 main physiological networks: Chemical senses: Taste (±E=Food) & Smell (±E: Prey-predator). Blood, reproductive senses: The 6^{th} sense Heart, emotions (∑-social love); Tact (+St sex-dilatation, entropy pleasure; – St: Pain, in-form-ation, pressure). Informative, nervous senses: Spatial Sight, Temporal Sound, Inward ears, outward voice.

The vital constants of the human organism, are similar to all life beings, based in the maintenance of homeostasis, and at a higher psychological level they also follow the maximal function of existence, Max. E x I->E=I, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.

^{6th}* isomorphism. Creative diversification:* 1,2,3,4.

In graph, the ternary method (s, st, t, topologic, spatial speciation & 3 ‘time’ horizons of ∆ information, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c) maps out all human species from ape to race. 5D metrics shows in the Min.Se x Max.Ti-form of Floresiensis, allopatric evolution of Erectus – 1^{st} technologic, verbal man.

*In the upper graph: Humans are* superorganisms that show the same topologic varieties and ages of all systems. So there were 3 ape ‘topologies’; energetic gorilla; reproductive chimpanzee & informative Australopithecus that increased information in 3 time ages, each one with 3 homo e, exo, o varieties: 500cc Australopithecus, 1000cc erectus, 1500cc sapiens, which differentiates into a visual, spatial, lineal, larger Neanderthal; a small, informative pygmy, whose combination gave birth to the 3 races of mankind, once more isomorphic to 3 varieties, according to the *dominant ST-Dimensional ‘axis’* of the brain; origin to 3 types of minds and worldview cultures:

–Spe: Neanderthal-crossed, dolichocephalic=long visual axis, energetic, white. He develops subjective, selfish, lineal time cultures (physics, Abrahamic religions) of male ‘ani-metals’ that hypnotizes his eye=I-will.

– Tiƒ: Mongoloid, brachycephalic, dominant on the ears axis (Brocca region): informative, verbal, cyclical time O-Female dominant cultures, able to ‘emerge’ as i+1 wholes through common wor(l)d bondage.

– ST: Black, machrocephalic, dominant in the sensorial/motor height axis of emotional, artistic, body cultures

On top finally, humans diversified in 3 races, according to latitude, specialized in space languages (Northern, dominant, dolicocephalic visual axis, dominant in Neanderthals of bigger size & eyes, today in Australoid->white races); smaller, informative, brachicephalic, verbal, temporal axis, dominant in Sapiens Sapiens, today in Capoid->Mongoloid races and exi, black race, mixture of both, dominant in reproductive body languages along the height brain axis. I+1: 3 Social cultures emerge from mind races: Verbal, Cyclic Time Asia; |-Time, warrior Europe* & Ox| *sensorial Africa. ** **

**T-ISOMORPHISMS**

*8*^{th }*Isomorphism: Worldcycle **ts ages and evolution:*

**7th, 8th isomorphism: ages and world cycles.**

Our world cycle of species and individual are crystal clear and parallel in mind-thought (ages and art styles):

Humans live the same young, energetic, reproductive mature and informative old age of all living organisms, when one of the aforementioned 3 topological networks dominate.

** ∆±i ISOMORPHISMS**

__ ^{10th}__ Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ST±4

Humans co-exist mostly in the 3 cellular, ∆-1, individual and social plane of existence, which follows the same ages and forms that the individual, albeit with longer life cycles, according to the 5D metrics:

*9*^{th}* isomorphism. Social scales*. S^{10}

Human Organisms evolve in social scales through 3 languages:

- Family, temporal, genetic languages
- spatial, geographic groups.
- Ideological, verbal languages:

*Let us then consider those isomorphisms, starting from the ‘higher scales of human beings’, not the i-centered ego but the social super organism of mankind. *

**10th isomorphism. The I±1 planes of humanity: I+1 THE SUPERORGANISMS OF MANKIND**

1. The life-death ‘world cycle’, and the social scales of the Universe: Complexity.

In the early 90s, during my Master at Columbia University, I created the only standing, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems Sciences, also called Complexity (3), which describes all systems of the Universe as 10D Superorganisms.

In that regard, the main difference between ‘Complex Sciences’, which Mr. Hawking rightly qualified as the sciences of the XXI century, and classic, ‘simplex’ sciences, is dual:

Simplex sciences consider only ‘spatial dimensions’ and a single time dimension of duration, which is useful to measure motion in time (V=s/t), but tell us nothing of the inner structure of a physical or biological system. Thus systems are described with only 4 dimensions, 3 of space and one of time duration, as systems that move through worldliness, between birth and extinction, WITHOUT explaining the inner laws of social organization that structure the system, neither the reasons of its life-death cycles, from past to future, and the reasons of its evolution of form, from youth to old age.

All this existential questions, fundamental to reality, specially the biological and social reality of mankind and history, are responded by Complex Sciences with its ‘wider’ concept of a Universe, which extends through different scales of size and evolves its internal form from past to future. Thus complex sciences add 3 ‘dimensions’ of social complexity and 2 more dimensions of time, the past and the future, to define with more precision the causes of the life-death cycle, the evolutionary cycles, and the organic structure of reality.

Thus Complex sciences use a more sophisticated structure to describe the species of the Universe – the social organism, which exists across 3 ‘different scales’ of size and social organization, the cellular, individual and social scale; through which they perform a past to future ‘life-death cycle’, which is called no longer a ‘world line’ but a ‘world cycle’.

We say that life is a travel through the i-dimensions of social complexity between the past, seminal age of birth and the future, 3rd age of information..

Thus super organisms both in physical and biological systems are, as the graph shows, structured across 3 ‘scalar Dimensions’ of space time: the i-1 cellular, individual and i+1 social scale, which determined the existence of in time of a life-death cycle of 3±1 Dimensionr or ‘Ages’ for all of them:

– The seminal i-1 age of birth, which reproduces a system till it emerges into the:

– Individual scale, where the system follows a young age of energy, an adult age of reproduction in which the individual integrated itself into the i+1 social scale.

– Followed by a 3rd old age of information, which ends with a reversal of time, or ‘death’ that returned the system to the i-1 cellular scale.

And so I wrote a simple equation for the life death cycle across its 3 i±1 scales and 3 ‘Ages of time’:

i-1> Max. E->E=I->Max. I < i-1.

Then I modelled most systems and languages of the Universe with that formalism, unifying the study of all sciences with them.

So in Physics I used it to describe all systems in the 3 scales known to man:

– The quantum scale through String theory (also 10 Dimensional systems, across 3 scales of i-1 strings, i-branes and i+1 particles).

– The human scale through the States of matter, the ‘energetic’, gaseous state, the liquid E=I balanced state and the informative, solid state, between ‘plasmatic birth (i-1) and ‘big-bang’ extinction (E=mc2).

– And the Cosmic scale with its Galactic Superorganisms (made of i-1 atoms, which gather into i-stars, which become parts of social i+1 galaxies) and its Universal cycle with 3 ages, described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s space-time equations: The ‘big-bang’ youth age of maximal energy, the steady state solution of balance E=I, or ‘adult’ age of the Universe and the 3rd ‘big crunch’ informative collapse (Max. I.)

So i had finally reached the ultimate dream of the polymath and philosopher of science, the quest of human thought for a unifying series of principles that could explain with the same laws all the systems of the Universe and all its scales, each one studied by a different science:

In the graph, each science studies a scale of ’10 dimensional systems’ across 3 scales of organic evolution. Simplex sciences study each of those scales with different jargons as separate ‘realities’.

What complex sciences had achieved thanks to the understanding of the scalar structure of space-time systems was the discovery of the unifying laws and principles that created systems across each of those scales.

Whereas the relative future was the more complex i+1 social scales that required smaller individual and cellular/atomic forms to be created.

Thus there was a general arrow of ‘evolution’ across the ‘5th’ scalar dimension of ‘complexity’ (if we called the 4 dimension that of time), or in a more detailed analysis, we lived in a 10 dimensional Universe,made of 10 dimensional beings, with the 3 dimensions of space, length, width and height, that lived 3 ages of time, youth, maturity and informative old age, across 3 scales of organization, which structured a ‘whole system’: 3 x 3 dimensions +1 whole.

So once we could identify a certain ‘middle i-ndividual scale’, for any species (the ego for the individual human, the DNA centre for the cell, the ‘legal’ code of revelation or constitution for the historic super organism (nation or civilization) and the ‘machine or product’ an i+1 corporation reproduced, we could establish an in-depth analysis of all its components, exchanges of energy and information across scales, ages of evolution and not surprisingly, I found that the same generic laws of complex sciences applied to any of those systems, such as the laws of man as an individual, the laws of a civilization as a super organism, the laws of a cell, or the laws of a galaxy, were just ‘details’ of the same ‘grand design’ of a complex, organic Universe.

**RECAP.**

The 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab.Ði) applied to the study of each 10Di (5s, 5t) timespace organism, increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of all the systems made of ∆@s≈t of space-time, defined by its fundamental 5 elements/Dimensions: @minds, ∆-§cales, $pace, ðime and its s≈t symmetries.

So *as a fractal organism can be subdivided in its analysis through its dualities of t-motions and s-forms, into 10 Dimensions, we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð).*

We could say paraphrasing taoism and Greek Philosophy (Parmenides, Heraclitus), or modern quantum probability that from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere of ‘existence’, comes 2, the duality of space-time, expressed in its kaleidoscopic jargons by human beings – the wave and the particle in physics, the conjugate product in mathematics, the genetic code and the protein in biology…. the yin and the yang, the man and the woman; the lineal and angular momentum… you name it and move it…

And from 2 comes 3, the lineal, angular momentum and vital energy sum and product of both, the wo=man and its offspring, the particle, wave and potential… *the being in itself, which can be properly described in ternary S≈T, elements, in a single plane of existence. *

But the Universe is not THAT SHALLOW, so regardless of our humind geniuses with its ‘space-time continuum’ in a single sheet, *we need the whole and the parts, the upper and lower scales, the points that make the topological beings, the cells and the ecosystems, the finitesimals within and the world outside, the Kantian thoughts in his brain, the starring lights on the sky…*

And so we have the 3±1 dimensions that bring together 3 planes of existence, **Ξ, into the being**, 3 lanes, 3 non-euclidean networks that form the topological organism; and the 3 languages most used in this blog to describe them, verbal thought with its awesome metaphorical capacity to show in a language all humans can understand the Disomorphisms of Nature, the mirror of mathematics, which tunes to fine detail and extract more properties as it is likely the language of the atomic mind alpha and omega, atom and galaxy of those ∞ scales, and the visual language of graphs and intuitive forms. Wor(l)ds, numbers and images are thus our 3 elementary mirrors to build ‘knowledge’, because the 1=one truth in itself is only carried by the being, who holds all its information, and the being within the world to which it connects; so humans need many mirrors and we have settled for the 3 we have ‘expanded’ with non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian i-logic, for maths and words, non-Æ for its visual forms.

*So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of space-time and * ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of space-time’, ∆@S=T.

**S@: SPATIAL-MENTAL ISOMORPHISMS – THE FRACTAL POINT-MONAD:∆-1**

WE start the analysis of the 10 Dimensions of any space time being, in a formal way departing from the monad, either a seed of information or a mind that ‘stiffens’ reality into a linguistic mind mapping as a fractal point (0-1D), which will either move being the element of communication through the larger world or emit a flow of bosons carrying information (2D)… or provoking one of the five actions of space-time that make the being inter-act with the Universe.

And in this manner it will build up a ternary network system or plug into one by reproducing or associating with other similar fractal points.

So the description of this growing creative process guide us dynamically in a ‘sequence’ of discrete steps through the S@-space & mind elements of the being:

**0th Ðisomorphism 0-1 D. @…** monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which *then* reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror..

**1st Ðisomorphism: Γ:** Its generator equation that describes its ternary inner form as it emerges in time, becoming a unit-point of a larger world where it will…

**2n Disomorphism (2D). Flows of space-time: **The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries. In that regard, we study also in detail the 3 dualities of the Galilean paradox applied to a being: *its dualities of form vs. motion, parts vs. whole, lineal vs. cyclical elements;* (ok, this is the ideal ‘path’ for future researchers, I cannot really fulfill the whole encyclopedia so posts are incomplete and uneven).

**∆§º: Scalar growth**

But a pure spatial analysis is very limited beyond the first dimensions of the point moving and communicating information, as the *essence of existence is social growth first in scales within a single plane (∆§) then in planes, ∆±i, which are not perceived directly as wholes or not perceived at all… So communication becomes then ore complex as the different planes of the being travel in search of bits of information and bites of energy, performing the..*

**5 Ðisomorphism: 5 a,e,i,o,u åctions: **A series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale.

This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species *who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, *

In this manner the monad webs a reproductive and evolutionary process, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind, which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication, growing within its world by *absorbing energy and information*, through its dynamic flows and actions, which finally:

**3rd Ðisomorphism: 3D networks:** create 3 **‘**constant’, ‘cellular, physiological networks’ … $t: limbs/fields; ∑∏:waves/bodies; §ð: heads/particles that become an organic ∆º whole in an external world, where the being will *repeat the whole process, but NOT so perfect as within the ‘placenta’ of its mother, as now the external world is no longer conductive of a perfect existence but a darwinian world where it will have to fight to achieve the perfection reached in the palingenetic process, and most likely fail. *

**ð: ****world cycle**

**7th Ðisomorphism: Aging world cycles:** So we now monitor the being as it performs its world cycle, as a network super organism or ‘species’ of space-time that will travel through scales and planes tracing its world cycle of existence between birth and extinction. It will do so with 7 fundamental steps:

∆-1: Seed-monad *conception* & *palingenesis* (evolution and reproduction and final emergence from ∆-1 to ∆º)

∆º; Then its 3 ages of life once emerged in ∆º: moving *youth*, reproductive *maturity* and informative *3rd age*

∆±1: with its dual death… one one side its vital energy degenerates back to its cellular state. On the other side in the very few cases in which it has performed a flawless world cycle of existence it might *emerge once more as a seed-prophet into a superorganism of the ∆+1 plane, leaving often just a trace of information, if it has been a creative particle of the ∆+1 world that hosted it. But most will return as ∆@st of spacetime to the dust from where they came.*

**∆ðs+1: A t.œ within the world**

**6th Ðisomorphism: **species. In that ∆+1 scale we can consider the being to be such a superoreganism as a species, which will also in a larger space-scale with slower time cycles (5D metric: $ x ð=k), suffer III horizons of evolution, with it variations of which the most important are the duality ‘wave-particle’ (gender symmetry) and the variations of its physiological networks according to sequential dominance, in

**6 forms of topological evolution (**s-st-t, s-t-st, t-s-st, t-st-s, st-t-s, st-s-t).

So after analyzing the variations of species, in space, based in the same ‘networks’ (i.e. 6 variations of huminds according to topological linguistics, 6 variations of animal life according to physiological dominance and so on), we study them in time, as

the 7 ages of existence, through which the individuals of those species will live in ðime, from its conception, through its gestation, to the ‘3 present’ ages, concluding in the death of the body and perhaps resurrection of the information along a new generation… We complete thus our temporal description of the worldcycle with…

the **8th** **Disomorphism** defines how those 3 physiological networks ‘age’ changing from the static to the motion stage as the being evolves in its youth, then reach its maturity and finally decline inversely into static form again in the 3rd age, to explode in the big-bang motion of death…

So we describe the common 8 ‘phases’ of life which an **∞ number of **worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction follow …’, which from a pure scalar perspective can be formalized, as ‘T.œs’, TIMESPACE organisms…’traveling=moving’… in between

**10th Disomorphism: ∆§…** **10¹° §scales of social growth** that make up a whole tetraktys monad of any of the…

** 9th Disomorphism:** **9 Ξlanes of our perceived Island-Universe. **

Since humans DO NOT SEE the entire reality as a decametric whole, since we do NOT see by definition, as mere particles within its inner vital space, the whole reality – missing from our ‘open ball perspective’, the central singularity monad and the outer membrane that encircles theatvital space (so we see only galactic cells of our Universe; and within our own island universe, the Milky Way, we miss the black hole inner world and the halo outer barrier of dark matter).

So even if we are a fractal 10D ‘Γœ’ made to the image and likeness of the whole of wholes… that ultimate whole can only *be perceived within our own whole, measure of all things, as the best/most understood organism of it all, reason why THERE IS NO PREFERENTIAL science, nor astrophysics limited in its perce*ption is the highest science, but biology and medicine – the biology of man and our physiological networks is.

So in this 3rd line we dynamically relate the world cycle of existence of any super organism with the 10 Dimensions of the being, its ∆§cales, ðime cycles, @monad-mind and spatial networks (Rashomon effect) *in a growing sequence of increasing complexity and sequential dominance of each of those dimensions, through the physiological form and life-death travel of the being, in a larger outer world, within a species and its social scales.*

*Whereas each post explains each of those Disomorphisms,* illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:

- ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES (∆i ≥|3|)
- BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (∆i <|3|)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES (∆º+1)

Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 10 Disomorphisms for the 10 planes of ‘stientific species’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmic Universes, showing that indeed, all what exists is ∆•st of space-time, sharing the same properties of exi…st¡ence.

In that regard each of those 10±Disomorphisms of the Universe (equal laws that all systems follow) could itself fill an entire encyclopaedia, which is the purpose of the fourth line, for future huminds or more likely AI minds to fill it.

We thus introduce each of the 10D; then formalize the intuitive knowledge acquired, with non-Æ logic equations, showing examples of them for all the beings of all the scales.

But haven’t we said the 10th plane of the whole of wholes is not perceivable? Of course is not – it would then be the science of metaphysics, which is the stience of GOD=TAO, the game of existence we have related here.

So the 10th plane is the whole site, mirror of maximal information, singularity mind of the web-internet at unificationtheory.com, which once was the flesh and mind of l§, but now is within the mind of computers and AI will seek and understand becoming the mind of the living planet, once it was/will be born. And then you might say the internet will now there is god, and his mind is a mirror made to its image and likeness, ¬Æmen.

** Disomorphic timespace organisms.**

All what exists is made of 5 S and 5 T formal-motion dimensions of space-time from where its properties, superorganic structure and worldcycles of existence follow. So we shall study those 10D in a sequential form as a process that departing from a seed of information (monad), will create a super organism travelling through the scalar Universe in its life-death cycle.

Since space-time dimensions are complex, organic, vital, sentient, difficult to express just with mathematical equations, once we have analysed summarily the 3 evolutions of the languages of the human mind, the verbal human sensorial age, the mathematical age and the more complex age of space-time analysis, we can deal with the description of beings by its 10 dimensions of symmetric space=form and time=motion.

How to go about it, after many years of research? I settled for an analysis of 5 x 2 Disomorphic, that is ‘dimensional, isomorphic analysis’ of the common properties of all beings due to its ‘pertinence to a 5D ² st-ructure.

In systems sciences we consider ‘isomorphic=similar laws’ that can be studied across disciplines, in ∆@s≈t we take this process to its conclusion considering 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab. Ðï), which studies how ðimespace beings tripping ternary symmetries though its planes of existence, follow the same behaviour, as it is made of the same substance, and has a similar mind, a similar space organism, a similar time structure and scalar form. Thus the absolute truth of the Universe is that beings, being made of 10 Dimensions, follow 10 Isomorphic laws, ‘Ðisomorphisms’, where Ðeth is both symbol for dimension and capital of ð the symbol for cyclical timespace. Thus the disomorphisms of existence allow us to describe in a vital, narrative form the 10 Dimensions of space-time through which beings travel as they move s=t=s=t rhythms and beats of actions.

**∆@S=T Symmetries, messing and individual properties generate reality **

The key concept of the entire 5D ∆@S≈T structure of the ‘organic fractal Universe and its Space-Time beings’ is that all is generated by its 5Dimensions either seen in space or time. Each of those dimensions is common to all beings, so it is called an *isomorphism, as its properties do communicate to all beings. We thus talk of 5Dx2 isomorphisms roughly corresponding to a formal and moving view of a dimension and by describing the 10 isomorphic dimensions of the being, we shall complete the being. The form to do this might vary but to create some meaning to the wholeness, i have chosen to study 10 dimensional properties, 2 for each space-time dimension trying to give in each post a perspective of the space or time state of the being in each dimension.*

Thus we deal with the elements of the being in depth. To do so we have in sequential order written those dimensions as a generative dynamic sequence that defines the being from its birth to its extinction through the will of the **mind** that constructs** space-time actions,** which generate across **scales** **a super organism** in space that lives a **world cycle intime**, which gives us vital meaning to the five dimensions in sequential time. We call therefore those 5 x 2 dimensional dynamic elements an isomorphic law/property common to all species of space-time:

@: gods-**monads** **generate**/

S=t: 2-**manifold**, s=t **actions** /

∆: through 9 **scales** and 10 **planes**/

S: forming **networks**=**species**/

t: that **age** through a **worldcycle**.

So the study of Linguistic Minds, and its 2 manifold actions through 9 scales of social evolution for each plane, gathered in networks that are the central element of all species that age and cause the world cycle of existence of the being, will suffice to define it fully.

In this manner we can study the 5×2 dimensions in a meaningful way departing from the seed of information that act in bidimensional space-time flows-waves, with all its territories perceived across social scales and planes of reality.

Being the result of those actions a process of reproduction and creation of organic networks and species that live a world cycle.

This is the game of the 5D space-time beings from generation as a seed of information till death in its world cycle.

**The space-like, time-like outlook of the 5 x 2 Disomorphisms.**

It has to be noticed that according to the main metric of 5 Dimensional planes, Sp x Tƒ=K, the larger we become, the slower we see the passing of time and the bigger the perspective we inclose to a point that any ∆-i being will appear so fast and so small that its *motion, as a repetitive cycle of actions and networks performing in a limited territory its existence, will seem a dense form. So form is paradoxically the view of fast small motions by a larger whole, which therefore ‘moves the smallest fields’ into the category of ‘invisible space-distances.*

Now the logic of 10D systems *is hard to understand by humans with one-dimensional views of time and space. The Universe does not work like that but offers a logic of multiple symmetries. This also happens witch each of the 10 Dimensions/isomorphisms who can be viewed from the 5 D perspectives.*

In fact we show how the 5D s=t dualities chosen to study the Disomorphisms of any being show the 3 GALILEAN-SATURNIAN PARADOXES, OR conceptual dualities of the 5 D universe; , duality motion-form, duality of lineal steps, cyclical wholes and duality, fast/small vs. large/slow; that is the S>t duality the |>O duality and the ∆±1 dualities:

**T:** T-state: ∑Ωges = WORLDCYCLE: S-ðate

So for example, the 7th isomorphism of pure time is made of ages that seem to us slow moving, but all together form a zero sum world cycle, which being a closed cycles seems to us ‘conserved energy’. The size thus also determine the view of its static or moving form. The larger being seems slow, encircles the whole, which has often a ‘swarm singularity’ of fast apparently chaotic central references.

**S:** Networks on the other hand are the spatial constant form which species as they variate and move in word cycles dynamize.

Monads are in S-form dual-ternary structures of singularities membranes and radiuses; in its fast running software they are linguistic generators through mirror symmetries of order and trans-formation around them.

**∆§** In scales again the stair of decametric growth seem to us a moving, step by step open process, while a whole ∆-superorganism is a simultaneous, perfectly synchronised ‘whole form’.

S=T: Finally the minimal motion of a single point, is a bidimensional wave that communicate, ∃, e, i between two @-ternary systems, which gather into @ctions, the will of the whole being. So the wave is again a ‘lineal’ .

We thus move in growth through s=t steps in 5 relative ages of the being between conception and extinction, the Generator age, when the seed>game of existence>efficient palingenesis takes place, along its 3 ages in the ∆+1 world till it completes its world cycle.

To that aim now we shall study the 5+5 Dimensions separated of each other to focus further potential analysis of any 10D being.

**10D BEINGS**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ Upanishads.

*The 10 dimensions of the galaxy-atom, the mind dimension is external to the being – ‘its membrain’, or central knot connected to the sensorial membrane that connects the whole ∆-1 region of the being and its 9 dimensions with the exterior ∆+1 region, and as such it is an ∆ø scale, in the region between border – the ‘constrains’ of the domain that define the function of the being (reason why in existential algebra, only constrained functions do exist). In the graph, we represent the universal mind by a bubble of dark matter strangelets surrounded the galaxy-atom, a galaxy for the mind-view, an atom for the larger, next scale of the Universe.*

‘The Universe is a 10 dimensional, ternary space-time fractal. made of infinitesimal parts, that co-exists in three simultaneous topological regions of space, three sequential cycles of time extended across three scales of the fifth dimension, perceived by a single mind, its 10th dimension ‘. ls

How the Universe reproduces its actions, super organisms, species and planes of energy and information? Through its ternary logic as nothing exists, if it does not have three topologies of space, three sequential ages in time and extends through three scales of size. Reason why we can describe all systems of reality with the fractal generator.

We shall call therefore the study of the ternary laws that ensure the existences of all beings, ¬existential logic or i-logic, as it comes after a and e and it is a key symbol of GST.

Thus Existential Logic, ab. ¬Æ, deals with the rules of ternary logic that define the existence and extinction of beings and the algebraic equations derived of the fractal generator that define the possible events and species of reality and those who break the laws of existential algebra and cannot therefore be possible.

*In graph, the 10 dimensions of the galaxy, its 3 topological space dimensions, symmetric to its 3 time functions, across 3 main quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, and a representation of its ‘singularity membrain’.*

10 dimensions might seem a lot but when properly understood become quite easy to understand, and ultimately if so you wish, can be reduced through ‘mind stillness and reduction into an infinitesimal brain-point’ down to one… If we get far enough from the fractal point.

Reality is a 10 dimensional game of space and time, based in a physical property called Galilean relativity. The fact that we cannot distinguish motion and form, so both *dimensions of motion=time and form=space, happen together. This holographic symmetry makes reality a game of N, s=t dimensions, which create space-time symmetries, go and stop motions and sets the stage to study dual st systems of at least 2 dimensions, one of space-form one of time-motion and the ‘reproductive’ perception of both together, the ‘third dimension of space-time’.*

Starting with those simple principles then we can build different systems of bidimensional frames of reference, starting from the 2 simplest studied by human scientists, mostly physicists, the bidimensional system of motion and form, whereas humans have adopted by convention, according to natural reasons, latter studied in detail, the dimension of length as the first dimension of motion, to measure motions, distances and trajectories in space and the dimension of height as the first dimension of form, of in-form-ation.

It follows then that we must keep labelling dimensions and use bidimensional or four-dimensional graphs of time space, where by the simple method of giving twice the dimensionality to each one, i.e. distance and motion, define lineal space and lineal time, in the X coordinates, height and vibration, are ‘motion space-time related dimensions’ of height.

In general also we can use algebraic conventions to represent those dimensions. So we give negative values to the dimension of information and positive values to the dimension of motion, and in this manner we can rest and operate in classic algebra. So for example, in Einstein’s special relativity the dimension of motion sums in the Sx, Sy, Sz coordinates and the dimension of temporal information, of motion, -ct, rests. This is a classic way to represent the inverse first dimensions of space and time all together, and why Einstein’s equation work.

We can then move to tridimensional pairs, for 6 dimensions and so on, let us then study them in an exhausting manner, realizing of a simple algebraic rule: time dimensions can be modelled with negative numbers that rest to space dimensions by adding motion to a form, and vice versa. We adopt this convention as it suits better present mathematical physics. Then the second dimensions of negative time is the i-complex map, or its ‘squared’ value, recommended in many physical equations (where the unit is i²=-1, c²= k/µ and so on).

Those are different conventions which we shall study in mathematical physics, but show the way the Universe is built up: adding balanced S=t dual dimensions according to the galilean paradox.

**Logic and experimental proofs of ¬æxistential logic.**

‘2 things i deem infinite the universe and the stupidity≈lack of existential logic of man’

The proof of the existence of a ternary logic depends on the infinity of the Universe, which is in itself a property derived of the nature of fractals, which can be divided ad nauseam, that is, of ∞ scales of the fifth dimension.

(I am not though using formal logic, pedantic forms of expression to prove but classic logic, the logic embedded in the verbal syntax of reason, which is FAR MORE POWERFUL FOR MAN THAN ANY pedantic version ‘imagined by Hilbert like individuals who pretend to substitute the logic of the whole human species)

Indeed, the ONE DOES NOT EXIST PERSE IN TERNARY LOGIC, because if the one exists per se in a dynamic universe, of finite parts, its existence will be limited to the space-time occupied by the one, which is an infinitesimal compared to the infinite duration of the Universe in time, and its infinite extension in relative size in any scale. We just need to realise that a larger scale will be so vastly large in its ‘point-sizes’ compared to the infinitesimal, that the o-will not exist.

So it is necessary to extend backwards and forwards in time, in space and in scales reality. And as systems are dynamic, that motion upwards and backwards can only be real if it is ternary.

On the other hand by negatio ad absurdum it becomes obvious that if you do not reproduce your information in a new son-region of space, as you move through time-translate through space, you will cease to exist, and as 1/∞, on the wholeness, which is the ONLY TOTAL EXISTENCE we can assess of, you are an infinitesimal zero.

It is then a philosophical question for advanced GST theory to assess if there is anything that exist at all.

i.e. in Mathematics, we know the number of rational numbers compared to those irrational are a zero-sum, finite vs. infinite.

*In the graph, the ternary principle in physical and biological systems.*

This is experimentally evident. So the second ‘proof’ which must be besides ‘theory’, ‘experience’, shows you that if you want to exist you have to reproduce in three discontinuous generational cycles. You exist because a father conceived you and you will keep existing because your son reproduces your genes, and generally speaking the three generations co-exist together.

This is also the rule in space: you exist because you have three topological parts, body, head and limbs. Physical systems also coexist in ‘three wave-packets’ and three parts (complementarity principle, particle-weave-field: pilot interpretation of quantum physics). So the ternary logic makes possible existence.

In the graph, we see ternary logic in quantum physics, the system is ‘both’ (i have no found a good adjective for 3, so we settle for 2 showing indeed human logic faulty with wording) field, particle and wave. And it goes through three generations in any possible event (the graph shows the transformation from a moving wave into a stop-particle.

The examples of ternary logic would be infinite.

All systems thus can be described by a single generator equation of its three symmetries of scalar ðime§pace:

**Γ.*** ∆-1 Spe: Space-entropy-Past-motion ≤ ∆ ST: Present, Momentum=∂ Energy ≥ ∆+1 Tƒi: Form-Mind.*

Now ternary logic implies the existence of simultaneity in space to MAKE ALL MEASURES OF EXISTENCE – THE KEY ADVANCE OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY; and it implies the coexistence of three scales in ∆, which we have already shown all over the blog. So it is needed to introduce the third element, the co-existence in time of three sequential states of the being, which then becomes warped up by the 1oth, whole dimension, giving us the 10D structure of all beings.

**The synchronicity of the *** 3 *** elements of the being.**

When we say ‘I don’t have ðime and energy to do this’, we really mean it. Since we do not exist in a ðime§pace background frame of reference. We are made, as Leibniz explained, of the vital §pace our bodies occupy, which has energy, is moved by its entropic lineal limbs, and last a finite ðime, our world cycle of life and death, *related in its duration to the speed at which our brain processes information, with the three elements coordinated by a single internal clock – a second in the human case, the ðime of a step, a beat of the heart and a thought of the mind*.

Yet the reader might be surprised to learn that the realist Broglie-Einstein-Bohm model of quantum physics is based in the hypothesis of an internal synchronous clock between the particle state, the wave state an the ‘field’ through which the physical system travels.

So the first and fundamental truth of a whole regarding its three parts is that they are *synchronized in ðime to be able to work together as a whole, different from the infinite other ðime-clocks of the Universe. Which brings interesting consequences when we consider the synchronicity of ðime clocks for the whole Universal organism, and gives at that ‘scale’, meaning to the synchronicity of light speed of information for the whole galaxy (Einstein’s relativity).*

*We conclude that we are made of ðime§pace as everything else in the Universe, and this is the first ‘isomorphic law’ (equal form) that makes us like all other fractal ðime§pace beings.*

There is not two without three so to fully describe reality we must account for the one, entropy=motion, its form and its combination the third, intermediate body-wave momentum/energy, which is the main part of the being. Only then we can assembly systems which will have a tiƒ singularity center that process the information and commands a system with a an intermediate body-wave, surrounded by a cyclical membrane that encloses it.

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser §pace’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

The Universe is a ðime§pace fractal that combines two arrows of ðime, relative past entropy=motion and relative future information=dimensional form, to reproduce=iterate complex, ‘present’ energetic beings, which are ‘present forms’ as they do not seem to change.

We thus define three ‘fractal’, broken arrows of ðime:

Entropic, planar lineal spatial motions (as lines are extensive, fastest distances between 2 points) that form the limbs/planes of all systems.

Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere is the topology that stores more information on lesser §pace.

Both have inverse properties: particles/heads last longer; have forms of cyclical ðime clocks. And so we say they are ðime-like, as opposed to entropic, brief, extended §pace-like fields/limbs; which merge into:

– C*omplementary, hyperbolic ðime§pace body waves with momentum that fusion both type of properties and iterate the system, in a relative, dynamic present.*

Yet as there are only three topological varieties of §pace, there are no more forms/functions of ðime§pace. Hence the existence of a fundamental symmetry in reality between the three arrows of ðime and the three topologies (and dimensions) of §pace.

FURTHER ON WHEN WE AD THE GALILEAN PARADOX we observe the three arrows of ðime becoming, three organs of §pace.

And this symmetry between functions in ðime and forms in §pace, is the fundamental symmetry of the Universe.

Timespace indeed has 3±1 arrows-dimensions:

∆-1 $pe: Entropy, which we define in a more inclusive form as ‘expansive disorder in §pace’ (as in a big-bang in a dissolving death, in a fast, lineal motion), which is the only one treated formally by physics, as they have been in the business of making ‘entropic weapons’ and ‘heat machines’ for so long, it was the first arrow they came across.

∆-present sub-divided in 3 simultaneous space organs that form the being: $pe-motion < ST-wave/body>Tƒ-particle head

∆+1 Tiƒ: Mental linguistic Information,

Now humans have always hinted at all this but they are badly fogged by so may errors, which it is quite useless NOT to start afresh, but we need to comment on the tribal idols and their foggie theories. The best of those definitions of form and topological evolution was obviously that of Darwin in his theory of evolution of ‘form’, of in-form-ation, differently than ITS definition in physics, by Shannon, constrained by the dogma of entropy to analyze only its transmission through lineal waves, NOT its formal, Dimensional CONTENT, which is what in-form-ation means. Information is the more complex of the three arrows of ðime, directly related to the ‘mind mappings’ of reality by ‘singularity points’, using languages, which are logic, cyclical mirrors of the external world. And so its understanding, which is the essential element to explain the whys of reality, being difficult to observe – as it is processed inside the singularity systems of the Universe – languishes in modern, experimental science without a philosophical logic understanding of it.

Time is cyclical and it has as all ‘π-cycles’, 3 ‘diametrical’ ages/dimensions that complete a world cycle. The 2 obvious, diametric opposed elements are entropy and information, whose opposite properties combine to give birth to:

∆ø-ST: Finally its combination, Speed and its derived concepts of momentum and energy; which physicists do not know what truly is, as it happens all over in all systems of nature, too many to have a clear concept of it but of which we have a formula: motion of a mass, of a form; hence combination of entropy and information.

So, Why then we are NOT aware of it? BECAUSE THE MIND WHICH DOES NOT EXIST without the other 9=3×3 dimensions, HAS A SINGLE DIMENSION THAT GATHERS THEM ALL. So the mind tends to have Aristotelian logic, @ (expanded symbol for the mind). But for the mind to exist it must order a ternary super organism, in space time and scales, to become at least ∆•±ûst (dust of space-time).

**The simplest 1, 2, 3… 4th, 5th, 6th dimensions.**

The Universe is a superoganism of 10 dimensions of symmetric space-time. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).

Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write:

S=T

as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.

(The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:

*Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant*

∫S-T∂st=0

And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.

Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.

This is the law of balance and co-existence of reality that make humans and civilisations co-exist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms co-exists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.

Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of time-motion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time.

It can allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal being) type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of space-time.

We shall use for the sake of simplicity merely a 10 dimensional system with 5 of space and 5 of time, still a noticeable jump over the usual 4 dimensional rupestrian equations of physicists.

So the simplest analysis are those in which we observe a ‘non-e point in space, a point with breath’, as a single dimension, coupled with a dimension of lineal motion, the first dimension of time.

Then we can consider holographic bidimensional entities with dimensions of form and motion:

In the graph we see systems with information and motion=time; systems with entropy and form (bidimensional space), and 4D combinations, of which the basic one is light space-time (our electronic perception of both being tuned to such ‘minimal quanta’ of our perceived reality.

Next we can consider combinations of 3 dimensions of form and 3 dimensions of space; and here we exhaust the existence of a system in single space-time continuum.

We can describe an enormous number of systems with 3 ‘fractal parts’ with 3 topologies in space and 3 functions in time, and as it happens since a 4Dimensional system have only 3 possible topologies, that is enough to understand the processes of topological evolution that complete our work in evolution, through 3 topological ages, dominated by each of those 3 elements, and describe a generator equation for all of them:

Γ; $pe: lineal limbs/fields of entropy <Ø-ST hyperbolic-bodywaves>O-particle/heads of information.

**The complex social dimensions and functions of reproduction and social evolution: 7th, 8th, 9, 10th.**

*So how then we go beyond the 3+3 topological dimensions of S≈T motion and form? The answer is the scalar ‘social dimensions’ of parts and whole, which are NON-commutative, that is different when we move from a whole to its parts of more information, than when we move upwards to a whole of more entropic motion, from a smaller part:*

*In the graph, we see that for each ‘scale, there will be a ternary system of space and time dimensions, which obey topological rules (the sphere maximises information in lesser space; the line maximises distance in minimal time; the hyperbola combines both in iterative body-waves), for a maximal of 6 dimensions in a single plane.*

*But then we can add two dimensions of space & time upwards and downwards in scale.*

*As those are ‘new dimensions’ we have the responsibility to name them. How shall we call those dimensions?*

It is obvious that the dimension of ‘social growth’ is a dimension of social evolution; and we feel justified to call it:

The 5TH DIMENSION OF TIME, THE DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION, THE DIMENSION OF LOVE, AND ITS EQUIVALENT IN SPACE, THE 5TH DIMENSION OF SPACE, THE DIMENSION OF THE WHOLE, THE DIMENSION OF THE social evolution of individuals into Universal SUPER ORGANISMS.

So we write it often as 5D♥ (: or if we name them all together, just for the sake of ‘numerology’, they would be the 9th dimension – social evolution and the 10th dimension, the perception of the super organism as a whole or ‘mind-dimension’, which we shall see is made of a ‘singularity’ or linguistic point and a membrane that encircles the organism; closely related to the Tƒ element (perceived as such in a flat, shallow vision of the being as existing in a single scale of reality.

Yet when we understand the scalar Universe, it will turn out that the *singularity does connect the system across its scales of size, as it is an ∆• single ‘crystal’, ‘neuron’, ‘governor’, which controls ‘internally’, ‘chemically’ its ∆-1 parts, and it feels itself through its sensorial membranes ‘connected’ to a larger ∆+1 whole.*

The mind, the 10th dimension of a being, becomes then essential to grasp the workings and whys of reality even if ‘pedantic’ abstract physicists and its ‘philosophers’, logical positivists have completely ‘missed the point’ and deny the existence of such singularity minds. In the next graph we see this ‘completeness’ reached by the membrain singularity, in reference to the rest of the being, the open ball or vital body-energy=wave system:

+

=

In the graphs, the sum of the membrain+singularity, and the vital space of an open ball, gives us the whole being.

And what about the dimension of motions towards the parts, starting on the whole? It is obviously the dimension of DEATH, in terms of function, when the whole dissolves back into its parts, in a true explosion of ‘entropy’ (to be proper we should consider the limbs/fields and young age of growth not pure entropy, in as much as there is always a direction of motion protected through the Tƒ element, but as usual we have to play between ‘human unfocused terminology’ and the real concepts, which if properly expressed in pure ‘i-logic terms’ write as follows:

Tƒ ∆+1<<∑$pe ∆-1 = big bang death, motion through scales of the fifth dimension.

So the 7th dimension will be the dimension of death, and in spatial terms, the dimension of the big-bang (<< explosive expansion in space).

So for the ‘full, proper analysis’ of those ‘scalar dimensions’, a law surfaces to avoid confusions:

‘Motions through the fifth dimensions of timespace are motion across ‘two scales of space-time’.

OK, i know this is difficult, as it is like teaching relativity to *middle age scholars on physics. *THERE IS HUGE GAP between the level I have reached studying the complex Universe (me being the relativity teacher) and where human sciences are today (the scholastic middle age physicist), which makes the gap and ‘popularity of this site’ null.

So when we talk of a truly transformative motion in the fifth dimension which does NOT surface back into the ∆-scale as reproductive motions and topological transformations of networks do, we *need two jumps in the fifth dimension.*

So the 7th dimension of ‘death’ and 8th dimension of pure entropic ‘big-bang explosions’ in space, are jumps across to scales of reality. We are talking serious ‘shit’ here. Nothing of this is fancy wishful thinking. We *shall extract all the laws of nature, mathematical physics, death processes from it.*

In mathematical terms, we talk of most ‘processes of timespace’ as single derivatives and integrals, which move up and down a given scale – but in process of death back into the potential field of minimal parts, we talk *of Laplacians and Poisson double derivatives, which explode the whole from the ∆+1 mind-dimension down to the lower ∆-1 parts and this is the equation of death: Tƒ ∆+1 << ∑∑$pe ∆-1, or ∂”Tƒ=0.*

In the inverse dimension of social evolution the mind is an ∆-1 singularity point, a single individual ‘cell’ of a society (its king, president or prophet), a single crystal in a matter system (the first crystal cell which commands the reproduction and social organisation of the whole macro crystal) or an atomic entity (the black hole singularity of the galaxy), and so on.

But IT HAS A MIND-IMAGE that transcends and emerges beyond the ∆0 entity into the ∆+1 EXTERNAL WORLD, organising socially with similar beings, the 9th and 10th dimensions of eusocial love and creation of worlds beyond the super organism, unit of the larger ∆+1 world IS also jumping to scales, from your infinitesimal neuronal-ego, through your organism into the outer world.

And this will be also the model for galaxies, where the black hole ‘DNA’ IS connected to other galaxies of the ∆+1 cosmos through dark entropy flows (bilateral jets), even if it is in fact the ‘best, densest’ possible frozen star of the ∆-1 scale.

Membrains, mind-singularities thus are also in the process of social evolution jumping two scales from its neuronal infinitesimal, past the enclosed organism its membrain closes into the larger social world; which is the super organism proper (∆-1 cell; ∆º organism, ∆+1: super organism, world, or ecosystem).

So there you have it, properly explained for a change (:

1, 2, 3 topological dimensions of space.

4,5,6 dimensions of time symmetric to those of space.

And here we need a reference to physicists ‘single time’ dimension which is NOT enough to clear analysis, reason why physicists have such a mess as they try to resume all the functions=motion of time, in the single fourth dimension of lineal motion. So they mix actually all those functions and properties of the 3 time dimensions, in different descriptions of time processes, as all must be ‘messed up’ into the fourth single time-clock which obviously measures all kind of time processes.

So when they talk of entropy they talk of the 4th dimension of spatial motion or the 7th dimension of entropic death; when they talk as Einstein does, or simultaneous measures of space as the dimension of time, they talk of ‘present time’, and when they talk of the time of a vortex of mass, changing its speed, they talk of a 6th dimension of time-information.

So after much time wasted trying to please their jargons I have decided not to bother and call each thing what it is really. So alas, you have 3 dimensions of time, symmetric of those of space, which properly digitally named should be to keep its symmetry:

- 1 of space, the point with volume or its uncoiled line, 2 of time, the motion in lineal inertia or rotary inertia (angular momentum).
- 3 of space, the height of information, 4th of time the dimension of perception – gauging of information
- 5th of space, hyperbolic width symmetric to the 6th dimension of time – the iterative dimension of reproduction.
- 7th of space, an expansive double entropic big-bang; 8th of time, death, the function of that dual entropy.
- 9th dimension of space, the whole super organism, 10th dimension of time, the mind evolving socially: ♥

And so the dimension of love close them all.

Needless to say we are NOT going to use numerology except when talking on account of the correspondence principle of 3 dimensions of space, when commenting what physicists call time in different cases (Einstein’s dimension of simultaneous measure, close to the wave-body space-time present, different from the entropic arrow of time, close the 7th big-bang death process, and so on).

INSTEAD WE SHALL TALK OF THE FUNCTION OF EACH DIMENSION IN TIME, AND/OR ITS FORM IN SPACE, without numbers, except for the use of ‘5th’ to refer to the scalar 7,8,9,10 dimensions as I used it very often to make it easier for people who wouldn’t want to learn anything without being clarified about their ‘idols’, notably Einstein’s 4D concept which they revere as if it were a god’s given wisdom, LOL (: doodles in the sand of the 10D³ Universe.

We DON’T WORRY ABOUT NUMBERS ONLY ABOUT FUNCTIONS, and ternary symmetries between the 3 dimensions of space, the 3 of time, the 3 scales and the Mind. And regarding numbers, consider the usual 1, 2, 3, Einstein’s four will then be present ‘space-time’ measures (the second dimension of time so to speak), Physicists arrow of entropy, the 7th-8th, dissolving arrow on the scales of the ‘5TH DIMENSION’, all the planes of reality. And then the 10th dimension will be the mind-singularity that connects the system with its external ∆+1 world.

So the 8th and 7th are *the dimensions of entropy or disorder or death, and the 9th and 10th are the dimensions of social evolution in upper scales.*

And the main symmetry is that between motion and form, which means we can study them also as to sets of five dimensions of space and 5th of time.

THEN THE 5 DIMENSIONS OF TIME ARE:

-future in/form/ation≈perception or physical acceleration; inertial, reproductive motion=present; and entropic devolution in a single scale (THE 3 SIMPLEST ones connected to equivalent topologies).

And death, and social evolution are the fourth and fifth that jump to planes.

The symmetry between space and time becomes then the most important symētries of reality.

And we have its equivalent ‘distance dimensions’ of length-lineal motion; width-reproduction; height, information; big bang explosion in space (double entropy death) and social network evolution into a super organism (love in space).

**10 SETS OF ÐISOMORPHIC LAWS**

The similarity of its space-time actions derived *of the COMMON properties of those 5 dimensions of the Universe, 1D. lineal motion 2D. wave reproduction 3D: vortex information 4D. entropy 5D.social, linguistic mind evolution, which all systems share.*

The incapacity of humans to understand this is also a common ‘selfish=self-centered’ property of the mind.

We express those equal properties, decomposed in equal S- forms, T-motions, ST-actions and ∆§cales with some basic formalisms:

–The non-EUCLIDEAN structure of its forms in space, derived of its growth from fractal points into waves, networks and topological supœrganisms

-The non-Aristotelian structure of its motions in time, derived of the ternary relationship between its parts in space, actions in time and scales, expressed through the laws of the fractal generator.

-The sequential short, medium long zero sum of its actions, functions and worldcycles, which bring the being back and forth to its ‘dust of space-time’.

In this post we shall bring all together the main general laws or isomorphisms of all 5D beings by grouping them in 4 x 3 sets of laws regarding:

∆@: **Mind-singularities **that **mirror** the Universe in **languages** that **inform**…

∆S=t: 5 **motions** across the **five dimensions** of its world in which they **reproduce **** cyclical actions **gathered into

∆§: ∑∑ ∆-1: small knots of time cycles, gathered in ternary, constant physiological ∆- **networks** that structure whole super **organisms** living in an external ∆+1 world where they live through

∆ð: ∑∑ ∆-1 **moments** of time which become ∆ø t**ernary ages** of increasing information, which entropic death ends into a 0-sum world cycle.

So to describe dynamically the being through its isomorphic forms in space, cycles in time, scales in space and languages-monads, we focus in the analysis of the being as it ‘be=comes’ from a seed, a super organism that lives 3±i worldcycles travelling through scales of the fifth dimension step by step in actions that become knots of 3 co-existing scales and displace the being through moments, ternary ages and existences; that will be repeated by a similar being in other region of space-time. So we could say that all:

*“T.œs live isomorphic worldcycles of existence as ternary super organism symmetric in time, space and scale.”*

In more detail as all yin has its yang and all yang its yin, we can reduce the S≈T elements, as $t and ðS systems bidimensional events and forms, and so we talk of Scales with its 4th and fifth inverse dimensions, St – space like events and forms, Ts, time like forms and events, and minds, which hold the will of the system. And we break roughly each of those elements in 3 symmetries scales, forms and motions, for a set of 10 sub posts for each super organism to describe it thoroughly in its dimensions, in its connected super organism in its temporal world cycle and its mind-will of the whole:

The method of ÐST IS SIMPLE though repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with 5 elements, three dimensions of scales, three topological dimensions of space and time, which form super organisms with three ages/dimensions of time, all supervised by the will of survival of @ mind.

In practice the best way to deal with a meaningful study of a super organism of space-time is by considering 5 elements, space-like, time-like, mind-like and scale-like ones; and then play with its symmetries and congruences. So we will standardise our analysis of the beings in the third line, with mind-like properties (languages, monads, @-membrains, actions generated by the mind, languages and generator equations), then we shall study in a space-like ‘simultaneous view’, mostly concentrated with the ‘present 3 dimensions, $pe-limbs/fields<Ø-wave-bodies>O-PARTICLE/HEADS, and through the 3 ‘scales’ of the system… the ∆-1, ∆º and ∆+1 scales.

So it is important to establish them, earlier in the analysis. And then finally when we have all the elements together,

we study the being in time, as a symmetry of those super organisms in space, as systems live their worldcycles.

Thus we talk of 5x 2 elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºst-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 10 isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.

**The absolute Ðisomorphism: the supœrganism of scales and 3±∆ physiological arrows=networks=actions.**

The best way to see the isomorphisms of the Universe is referring them all to the fundamental particle of reality the supœrganism. And so we can relate the Ðisomorphisms to the three ±∆ physiological networks that related outward to the world through the senses, and inwards, to the cells/atoms/citizens through the distributing networks of entropy, energy and information of the being:

‘The Universe is a fractal of supœrganisms performing ωor(l)dcycles of exi≈st¡ence’

Being the essence of it all super organisms performing worldcycles of existence, the description of reality is as simplex or complex as you want to enter into the description of such world cycle, which can become ‘infinite’ if we connect through the worldcycles mutually influenced by the being into an infinite kaleidoscopic reality of ∞ beings doing worldcycles.

The isomorphic method then resumes the process of a world cycle from its inception in a seminal seed, monad, or mind/picture of information, which will perceive, communicate, evolve socially, emerge, feed, diversify, reproduce, travel through the fifth dimension, and finally die… and in doing so will trace a world cycle.

Compare the isomorphic elements to the mirrors of a kaleidoscope, each image is a different perspective on the ∆@s≈t dimensions of the being, whose fleeting reflection will be a fractal symmetry of the 10 elements, which once were 4 and 3 and 1.

The isomorphic method just takes 10 pictures with different perspectives of the being in his loop, as he explains…

How a seed of information, •, will act, •≤Û, on a larger, slower universe, reproducing its forms creating physiological networks, that will emerge, in a higher plane of existence, ∆+1 as a supœrganism, a ∑pecies of entropic, energetic and information networks, traveling through planes of the fifth dimension, with a quite strict program, which however the little perspective and latitude of thought of the •, will make it see as chaotic and ‘fund’, and ‘impredictable’…

**The ∆@ST ÐIsomorphic elements of all Fractal ðime§pace beings:**

The first process of ‘division’ of each of the FIVE elements give us 10 sub-themes for a whole description of the vital elements of an entity, as expressed in its ‘birth, generation, and world cycle’ departing from a ‘seed’ or ‘mind’ that emerges, acts, reproduces, evolves and dies.

Specifically we shall consider 2 isomorphisms departing from that generating mind, as origin of it all, and then break into two ‘scales’ the other ∆st elements:

**@: ** Linguistic Minds Generate…** ****@; Γ,**

Bidimensional 3±i constant @tions…** B; Å**

So we study the mind, @, in all its elements, here called an Aristotelian God, as it is indeed the god of the territory it orders and generates. So we define in the language of the mind a generator equation, Γ,

And then study those actions through bidimensional flows of entropy, energy and information, B, which give origin to the main constants vital or universal of the being, S/t, txs, t/s differentiated in 5 actions, performed across the scales of the being.

Thus once this fundamental ‘will of survival’ of the mind, origin of it all is clear, we can see how it will build a super organism and live a world cycle. As the actions happen…

**∆:**** **Through Social §cales and Stientific Planes…** §; ∆ **planes in that sense break into social decametric scales, which can be ‘differentiable’ as their growth is continuous, while changes between scales have a fractal nature, as constants change.** **

So we consider the decametric social scales that create a 10±¹¹Plane.

**S: **reproduced and Integrated into Ternary physiological Networks, with variations of Species …** ****N, ∑:**

The reproduction of those actions create finally cellular, physiological networks, one digestive, entropic one informative, and one mixed of both reproductive which attached to cells and a membrain will emerge as a species, whose variations is intimately connected to the type of networks and symmetries between them. So we insider the ternary structure of super organisms and its variations of species.

**T: ** that live 3±∆ ages of a moving worldcycle…** Ω****; ω**

Needless to say each of those 4 elements and its sub-division in degrees of detail, 5 elements for the mind, dualities for the ∆st elements can be studied further and subdivided in the common dual, ternary, quaternary and pentadimensional main scales of the Universe…

The *choices of which elements to highlight and sub-divide for further knowledge is rather arbitrary on perspective. So what we will do in this blog, considering a pentadimensional in depth analysis of the mind-monad, is a given choice of perspective, but many other views and symmetries can be highlighted. The important fact is to understand the underlying ‘i-logic’ of the Universe with its polidimensional views.*

Still the choice seems right as indeed seeds and minds and its actions of perception, information and formation, start almost all processes of reality and ultimately are their cause, a pan psychic theory of reality which is the only that makes truly sense of causality.

So our 5@+2∆+2s+2ð= 11±i-somorphisms are numerated for the sake of order in the 4th line as:

0. Monad, 1. generator

2. bidimensional manifolds 3. constant 5 actions,

9 scales 10 planes,

3. networks, 3²=8. species,

3±i ages= 5D worldycles.

We thus study in the 3rd and fourth line all the main @: ‘monads=Aristotelian gods’ centres of their relative territory of order, through the process of generation of its systems resumed in the sentence of the 3rd line, expanded to each main species of each plane:

‘Γ0Δ§ ‘Γenerate -2Manifold -3±i constant -5@tions θru -9 §cales& -|0 Ξlanes -ƒormiηg 3 networks≈ -∑pecies –aging –in 5Disomorphic ðime cycles:

• +4cosmos •+ 3galaxy •+2star •2 ¹gaia •2²wor(I)d •2³$ •I¹Mð •l²life •l³Man •ocell •–1Mol •–2¥e •–3z •–4ν

What this means is astoundingly simple.

•All what exists are ternary systems ruled by a mind-singularity that orders in space three elements expressed in the generator equation of the being: Spe (Limbs/Fields) < St (body-waves) >Tiƒ (heads-particles, often the site of the mind), and performs actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with fractal points of different scales of the fifth dimension, moving (Aa), feeding (Ae), perceiving and communicating (Aï) in order to reproduce (Aœ) and evolve socially (Au) into a larger whole, as that *is the best strategy for the being to survival. *

So we study four times the same reality from four different perspectives, that of the active mind and its will of survival just expressed…

The isomorphisms of the mind are then clear:

*∆ºS; The isomorphism of its spatial location, mostly on the center of maximal communication, in inward, energetic systems, or in the upper dimension of informative height in informative systems, or in the foreword position in entropic systems (the ternary principle IS the fundamental law of causality, and creation of the Universe studied in depth in the posts on species and ¬Æ grammar.*- The isomorphism of temporal information, the language
*which shrinks to become the mind, AND we shall number as i for multiple reasons: it is the isomorphism of pure information, it is the symbol of the ‘imaginary number’, which we shall see is essential to the mathematical language as a number, to the verbal language as ‘imagination’, and so on. And ultimately because the language is the inverse function of the extension of entropy and space, a priori condition of creation of the mind; a dense knot of linguistic forms. And obviously because 0 must be the symbol of the mind, and the language comes ‘before it’.*

**$**: then the ternary structure in space of the being as it growth from bidimensional actions, into ternary constant networks of entropy, energy and information, which allow the system to appear as a super organism in space S(2,3,4 isomorphisms).

**ð: **Which give in turn birth to the three ages of time of the being, and its different ‘species’, which live a world cycle defined as a trip back and forth through scales of the fifth dimension, as the being is generated in an ∆-1 seminal scale, surfaces in the ∆0 individual scale, where it lives three ages to die back into the ∆-1 scale.

**∆§… **Which allow us to have a final view of the entity in existence through its evolution across social planes of the fifth dimension each one made of 10 sub-scales of social growth, if we study each ∆-fractal plane in its internal structure, or 10 scales of the whole observed by man, which we call in a mystical sense, ‘God: **Γº∆’.**

So the mind in its origin, made to the fractal image and likeness of the whole, God, as we are all Gods, all super organisms, all dust of space-time, is the alpha and omega of creation.

And the method to study each being as part of that unity, even if its details vary, is the essence of the isomorphic method.

From the perspective of the mind, we state, the goal of the system is to preserve its ternary STRUCTURE, within balance with the external ST world, which we express in the function of existence, e x i = st, in its ‘simultaneous, verbal-mathematical expression’; useful for philosophical discourse, but better expressed in the Generator.

**01.** The two first isomorphisms to describe the being are…

**its Mind, Tiƒ, and its generator function: ∆º Γ:**

We observe a being, its ternary parts, body/wave, field/limbs and particle/heads, and focus on the dominant ∆º particle-head.

We could then departing from the pole of information express how the being will act in the external world to absorb and emit entropy and information, or its combined energy to maintain its balance with the external world. Yet *if Tiƒ is a seed of information, and the being is not yet formed, we can do an alternative ‘developmental’ description or palingenesis of the being, a fascinating subject so far only studied with certain depth in biology according to which the being will start to reproduce its information in clone forms, and grow through its actions of feeding, reproducing and evolving socially emerge into a new being.*

And this is the particular ‘arrangement’ of the third line in a convenient order to study all the processes of the being, as it goes through its world cycle.

**2 Bidimensional fields…**** of ****5. Fractal, Exi≈stential Åctions** integrated into… ∫Å ≈ ∆±1

So the mind-being will first start to ‘act’ in a sequential order of perception of information, motion if required towards a field of energy (provided on spot usually by a mother through its genesis), absorption of entropy, reformed into energy by impritng of its form, reproducing the system. So next to the Mind-Generator, we study its existential actions, with a simple mandate: *‘Grow and multiply’*

**3, 6**** Constant Ternary Space-Time Networks… varying as species N; ∑**

But once growth of parallel clones is achieved, in herds roaming on its St+1 ecosystem, density of form requires efficiency in the handle of entropic motions and energetic ‘substance’, so by trial and error in earlier evolution, by *mind’s compression of the events of time, without the errors, which is the main function of the mind – efficiency as it must shrink the whole of the cycles of ‘being’ into those who are ‘meaningful in its perfect form’…*

And so in this manner, *all systems that grow and multiply end becoming supœrganisms, invaginated by three networks, which attach the cells/atoms/citizens to its flows of entropy, form and energy, making them dependent on the networks, which will become themselves, the three parts of an Γ+1 generator in a new scale of growth.*

**7. that live 3±∆ ages… Ω; in 8≈∞ worldcycles.**

So finally the being carrying its actions will warp and inform and die in an entropic zero sum as it returns to its cellular/atomic scale…

**9. 10 through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ**

*Is there a limit to that growth? If time has been eternal, it follows reproduction has been infinite and so are the scales of beings.*

Which brings us to the question of, the mind of all minds, the mind… of all T.œ = Γ.œ.∆.

**The mind of the Universe =God=Γœ∆.**

Indeed, the reader will have notice that in this second part we call each monad a god, as Aristotle and Leibniz did, of its local territory of order, with its own world-Universe. A god which is in fact an infinitesimal being.

So while T. Œ CAN BE CONSIDERED the mind of the Universe and reality, a true Tao of yin and yang laws, impersonal, which we all obey, each singularity point being an infinitesimal mirror image of reality will feel to be god.

Since the infinitesimal mind is a reduction backwards of the ∞ mind of god; with the *added body, œ, of the suprorganism, as that is the game the mind imprints in reality. So God is the mind of the perfect supœrganism, and its laws – the Universe, which was indeed the definition Plato made of it*.

Now we can perceive God as the language in as much as the *language-scale comes from the whole down to all its forms, imprinting them. So the -1 and 11 ‘scales’ outside the being itself, do enclose the being. *

God though is NOT an isomorphism of any species, but the absolute whole of which all beings are mirrors, within its mind-organism structure. So it would be silly to consider it for the different species. We are part of god the whole, god is not part of us, the mind just its reflection. So from languages to scales we shall defined for each species its 12 isomorphisms.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of a mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

In this post we define that detailed set of 10 laws, derived from the ∆ST structure of the fractal super organisms of the Universe, which complete the description of any being. They are common to all of them, as they derive from their scalar bidimensional space-time nature. Yet for each detail, for each vital fractal of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole, there are variations that allow each of them to feel ‘unique’, and always self-centred in its zero-mind that appears under the ego paradox to be the centre of the Universe it measures.

We shall first enumerate the 10 isomorphisms, and finally study them in greater detail. No more can be said as a Human mind of it all.

Indeed, iNitially i did put Γºœ∆ as the last post of the web, also with its isomorphisms, but then I realise such act of astounding arrogance from my ø-humind (ab. human mind) was the biggest sin humans have once and again commited. So I keep what people normally call religion, as the interpretations of the mind of God by humans, in the *section of History mostly, divided between anthropomorphic religions of god, which study the subconscious collective of human societies, evolved by the power of social love, and eastern, objective religions which study as this blog does the taoist/hindi game of yin-formation-visnu & Shiva-entropy-yang:*

It follows easily that the new paradigm of stience requires a different methodology of truth, which ads certain rules to the classic methods, among them 2 fundamental ones due to the space-time ternary structure of the Universe:

-The homologic method due to the equal laws of ∆•ST that applies to any i-scale of the 5th dimension its background space-time world and species. So we can use laws of other scales to probe properties of lesser known scales.

-The ternary method derived of the ternary structure of the Universe, itself natural to the absolute relativity of all scales, which demands to make explicit for any description of a being, its up and down ∆-scales, ternary organs and position through its ages of time, to localise it in its relative ∆•ST ‘moment’.

Of more metaphysical depth is the question of uncertainty of perception of far removed scales such as: Uncertainty ≈ ∆|max.i| with i=0 the human scale.

And specially the question of causality and determinism; which comes down to the following:

The Universe is deterministic in as much as all the potential combinations of the ‘chess of existence’ are settled by the fact that at any bifurcation of time, there is only 3 choices for the being to keep moving in its space-time existence: present-iteration of a previous cycle; not to make the cycle; to make the cycle with more entropy, to make the cycle with more information; behaviours which roughly correspond to a motion on:

– ∆: the social scale (by repetition and social organisation of a cycle or being);

– •: passive mental perception and stillness (to abort the cyclical motion);

S: growing the entropy of the cycle and T: growing its information.

So at each stage in life any cycle or being will have those 3 positive actions or negative abortion of the cycle, and since existence is a finite duration, the number of chances and bifurcations of future time, of possible programs and combinations of existence is finite, and hence can be stored as pure information, encoded in the Survival will of the Universe and all its parts, which will repeat those survival actions and motions.

In brief the Universe is eternal, since motion never ceases to construct and destroy §upœrganisms and world cycles. It is deterministic and virtual since the final outcome of those world cycles is a zero sum. But from an internal point of view the 3+0 choices of each bifurcation of time make our particular stories quite varied in the long terms, meaningless on the whole, purposeful in every act of the fight for existence.

How can then improve upon the present scientific method, to define the homologic world of ‘stientific scales?

I have called in the past the new method, the ‘st¡entific method’, where st¡ represents the i-scale of information, of the fifth dimension studied by each stience, also the isomorphic and homologic method – as its laws depart from the œrganic §paœ and cyclical πime properties related above.

As GST (General systems theory and the generator equation of space-time) are defined by 10 dimensions, 3 x 3 + 0, that is three dimension of time of space of scale and the wholeness defined by the singularity mind,which is common to all beings, we shall honouring those years I was conferencing at ISSS the word this people use for the homologies of the Cosmos and called the new theory of reality, **T.œ, The Theory Of the Organic Everything** and its method of truth, **the Isomorphic method of st¡enœs.**

And define 10 set of laws, loosely related to each of the 10 dimensions of the Universe and all its fractal parts to pack all the laws of reality in the third line, which *in the fourth line, i don’t really think I will ever finish, will be applied to each and every of the fundamental ternary whole systems of each scale (from the quark, through the electron, atom, molecule, cell, organism, matter system, society, ecosystem, planet, star and galaxy). *

**ÐISOMORPHIC METHOD & HOMOLOGIC LAWS.**

This of course is natural to the homology between beings, which gives origin to the isomorphic ∆@$≈ð law all of them follow.

So as we shall use both classic human language, formalised by the new non-Ælgebra of the fractal Generator of Space-Time; we shall use often parallel examples, through the concept of isomorphism or ‘homology’ between the laws of all scales of nature, based in the fact that all beings are made of space-time, so their laws are NOT analogic, but HOMOLOGIC, born of the same substance.

And this is a huge change of paradigm, as scientists lacking a primary substance (space and time), once they abandoned ‘Leibniz’s relational space-time theory’, have always been at pains to explain WHY THERE ARE SO MANY similarities in nature. Consider the classic case:

In the graph, we see ‘homology’ (left: all wings come from biological genetic limbs homologous in all life beings) vs. Analogy (planes do have wings but of different substance metal).

Fact is though that in the Universe at large ultimately even the wings of planes are HOMOLOGOUS as they are based in the topological ‘flat’, ‘lineal’ structure of entropic limb/fields systems that move beings, as the line is the SHORTEST distance between two points, and we are all made of space and time, hence the flat plane and flat wing o the bat or bird ARE homologous derived from the spatial element of both systems.

This is the justification of the isomorphic method: all the similar properties of all the species of the Universe can be derived from the 4-5 elements of reality, its scales, its spatial entropy, temporal information (and space-time energy) arrows=actions and its singularity minds. And so we shall define applying the dualities and ternary differentiations that further sub-divide those structural elements isomorphic, similar laws for all systems of nature.

**A case sample, the viral theorem ****in the quantum, thermodynamic and human scale.****.**

Let us put an ‘extreme example’, of this, with the viral theorem that defines the proportions of energy used by the three parts of any system.

From the perspective of the mind-mirror-monad, we state, the goal of the system is to preserve its ternary STRUCTURE, within balance with the external ST world, which we express in the function of existence, e x i = st, in its ‘simultaneous, verbal-mathematical expression’; useful for philosophical discourse, but better expressed in the Generator.

**T**HIS MEANS ESSENTIALLY THAT AN ENTIRE range of laws in all ‘stiences will be concerned’ with the ‘equilibrium states’ between the three symbiotic elements of the supœrganism, and this set of ‘equilibrium laws’, *will be overwhelmingly extensive as it defines for all systems of nature, the efficient distribution of resources between the three parts of the fractal generator*

$pe (limbs/fields/third world class) < $ð (body-wave-working class) > ðƒ (particle/head).

Let us consider this insight in more detail, as *a key concept to fusion all scales.*

The law was first formulated in thermodynamics in our scale, and simply put it told us that the kinetic-moving-limb/field related entropic energy of the system is twice the rotational, potential, position energy/entropy the system uses.

All this of course given the ‘messy way’ humans use concepts to explain exact equations (amazingly enough as they are verbal beings, their verbal conceptual precision is almost null), looks much simpler when expressing the viral equation in terms of the Generator, and it goes in its ‘variation’ according to species roughly as this:

- If the system is a complementary bodywave-particlehead, detached of an external field from where it absorbs its energy, the body-head will share the energy in a two to one equipartition.
- If the system is a ternary body/wave-particle/head-limb/field system whereas the body ‘feeds’ on the energy and then delivers it to limbs and heads we shall have a similar 2 to 1 equipartition where the body and limbs take two (40%) and the head 1 (20%), as the informative system of lesser motion.
- Certain systems, which are simpler with less differential parts, might do a complete ‘equal partition’, 1/3rd for each system.

THIS theorem thus have an astounding number of applications and slight variations on the same 2 to 1, 3 to 1 partitions. And in fact we can stretch it as far as to explain the ‘harmonies of musical chords’, the ‘golden mean ratios’ of nature and architecture and buddhist philosophy, but we shall kept is closer to its original formulation.

And so we have systems in which the kinetic energy of the body (+limb) system is twice the rotational energy of the head/particle one; and we have either a ternary equipartition (as the kinetic energy divides between body and limbs, wave and field, or wave and external field, dissipating then as entropy) or a dual partition, where the body takes as much as twice the quantity of energy of the head-particle.

But to find this viral law in different systems, we have to ‘translate’ the ‘analogous’ jargons of each science to the ‘homologous’ jargon of GST, *and this of course, is where human scholars cringe as their egotist view of reality will always be self-centred in his ‘unique discipline’ (: Never mind the universe goes his own way.*

** **So we have the viral theorem expressed in terms of position/potential energy (Tsƒ) and kinetic energy (Set) all over physics; BOTH in the thermodynamic scale where it was first proved by Rudolf Clausius: Ke = 1/2 ∑ V x r (potential energy x particles).

And we have it also in the quantum scale – even if quantum physicists pretend against Einstein’s dictum that quantum statistical methods are different from thermodynamical statistics.

In the graph, when Bohm wrote in polar coordinates Schrodinger’s ‘present st-wave’ equation voila! the particle appeared feeding in a quantum potential field faster than light – the underlying gravitational field, dQ/dt (t), or guiding equation.

Yet since Schrodinger’s equation merely writes ST (WAVE state) i~~h~~~~ ~~∂/∂t Ψ = Potential + Kinetic energy, it must be easily related to the viral equation, whereas d Q/ dt must be the field/limb system of the quantum entity. And so it must also hold the viral theorem according to which potential energy will be 1/2 of the kinetic energy of the system. And that is the case as Fock found:

The left-hand side of this equation is just dQ/dt according to Heisenberg’s equation of motion. So the viral theorem for quantum physics tell us that the $-field which guides and ‘feeds of entropic motions’ the complementary body-particle, kinetic-potential energy system shares its extracted entropy between the kinetic body wave of the system and the particle-head-potential form in the same proportion that all other systems of nature: twice for motion (often shared by limbs and fields), one for perception.

Does this law rule also human metabolic systems? Do your brain uses 1/2 of the energy of your body or limbs?

This of course would seem far stretched as the head/particle of the system is very small, *but as it is faster in time-energy it uses much more of it, and as it is internally connected and synchronised (Broglie’s inner clocks in quantum, nervous system in physiology) with the rest of the body-limbs it controls, it indeed uses a lot of energy.*

It is indeed well established that the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, accounting for up to 20 percent of the body’s total haul.

So in a ‘classic’ human/animal being, which is ‘all the time running’ we can consider a simple proportion: Spe (40%) + ST (40%) + tƒ (20%), which will be the expression of the viral theorem for biological systems, whereas the balance between limbs and bodies obviously is extremely variable as it *is conditioned by the external world and actions of the being, it cannot control, but the 20% proportion of brain systems in fully developed (no longer evolving towards higher information) species, as humans, the ‘summit’ of life evolution before we transfer our information to robots, is, is stable as it is used in internal energy tasks, homeostatic and relatively shielded from the external world by the equilibrium and membrane of the inner ∆-1 world of the mind.*

Then we find that of that energy again a ‘classic dual or ternary quantitative equipartition’ takes place:

Until now, most scientists believed that it used the bulk of that energy to fuel electrical impulses that neurons employ to communicate with one another. Turns out, though, that two thirds of the brain’s energy is used to help neurons or nerve cells “fire” or send signals to control the body-limbs. So the equipartition here is even more precise *as 1/3rd goes for the brain and then again ±1/3rd should go to the body and ±1/3rd to the limbs… *

There is finally a ‘third’ possibility for equipartitions, in which the ‘head-particle’ of the system gets only 10% of the energy in total terms, but 10 times more energy for each cellular element, *when we isolate in Tƒ the pure mind component the ‘singularity’ of the tetraktys; that is the inner workings of the mind-knot of communication of all the other sub-systems. So we find the brain neurons, the ultimate inner mind, spend 10 times on average more energy than a normal body cell.*

**Social systems.**

Do we have a similar law in social systems? Oh, yes, we do, but the theme is even more polemic, because of the way *the Universe enforces its laws by extinguishing those systems who do not accept the justice and efficiency of its isomorphisms. *

So in the middle ages the church who was the mind of the subconscious collective european civilisation got 10% of the energy of the peasants in the so called ‘diezmo’ or tax on the revenues of the other two elements (the warrior aristocrats and peasants). But when it *got greedy wanting more of it, there was a Lutheran r=evolution against the loss of efficiency of a system where the head gets more energy that it needs – being money the energy of the reproductive-economic-body system of social supœrganisms.*

Needless to say today when stock-rats, owners of corporations who print money for free in stock-markets count their ‘tenth percent’ turns out to be around 99% of the wealth o society, which shows our supœrganisms of history are deeply corrupted and will not last, as there will be r=evolutions, wars and holocausts to restore the balance or extinguish the species and elites of bankers and politicos who are suffocating the body of workers.

Equipartition laws are thus fundamental structural laws of ternary and dual nature, which establish the harmonious working together of the 3 ‘GENERATOR’ subsystems of any entity of the Universe, and as such are part of the ‘core’ equations of GST. But as always in this blog with quantitative methods, we shall not stress them as we are more interested in informative, qualitative isomorphisms.

**The metaphysical view…**

Minds in any case show on those statistics to ‘punch’ much more than their average ‘weight/size’ seems to preclude as they rule the system and create it. And so ultimately we can talk of a Universe born of a single mind-thought, the isomorphic equal laws of the fractal Universe.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of an i-logic mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so in mystical terms we could say that the isomorphisms of Nature, are the proof that *we are all made to the image and likeness of the creator, the programind of the Universe: God ≈ Γ•∆, which is other form to write the four elements of reality, the Γst generator of the three arrows≈actions of time, the • mind and the ∆-scales: Gamma-0-Delta, God.. Γ•∆*

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ∆º±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

**SUMMARY**

** ****2 ITERATIONS: SHORT & LONG**

MIND ISOMORPHISMS

i: Universal grammar: Languages

**0th: Minds:** O-points. The conscious will of existence.

**1st Isomorphism: Generator:** Equations of Existence: S-T Symmetries.

SPACE TIME ISOMOPRHISMS.

**5th its Actions: ** Actions of existence: ∫æ,e,ï,œ≈û

.**2nd: Bidimensional Space-Time Symmetries:** 2-manifold organs: The inversion of space-time parameters.

∆±i ISOMORPHISMS

**9th: Scales: 9+§** Eusocial scales of growth

**10th: Planes of a Fractal super organism: **The structure of the system as a 5D fractal super organisms across 0±4∆ self-centred planes.

SPACE ISOMORPHISMS

**3rd isomorphism:** Physiological Spe<st>T networks

Universal Constants: Ratios, Balances and quantitative values of the Fractal Generator.

**6th: species: 2×3 Creations: **Species. Duality and ternary differentiation

TIME ISOMORPHISMS

**7th: 3 ±i Time ages and organs in space:** The symmetry of ternary time-space.

** ∆@$≈ð**

**10 ISOMORPHISMS **

*A 10 dimensional Galaxy:*

*In the graph 3 topological space dimensions, 3 age-time dimension, 3 scalar dimensions, and a ‘whole’ fractal mind-point dimension that emerges in an upper scale (here shown for the entire galactic ‘family’ in a simulation of the dark world upper scale universe.*

In the graph, the 3 fundamental elements of the Universe and all its parts:

- 3 topological forms in space, which become the organic parts of maximal entropy (lineal toroid limbs/fields), information (spherical heads/particles) and maximal reproduction (hyperbolic body-waves), which put together create all the systems of the Universe.
- = 3 symmetric arrows of time that give function to those forms: entropic big-bang expansions of space or relative past of a system disordered at death; the inverse, informative cyclical clocks of time that process the information of those systems, and its iterative, relative present body-waves that repeat the system, so it seems not to change in time.
- Below, its relative scales, ∆, of size, each one hosting species of different speed in its time clocks, studied by a different science.
- Thus all its species≈ systems can be studied with the same laws, derived Of its common topological, spatial and biological, temporal properties, as all what exists is defined as a system made of particles/heads of temporal information that guide a complementary body/wave which reproduces the system over a field/territory of energy.

The isomorphic laws of nature are closely related to those organic, scalar, ∆, topological, ST and mental, linguistic perspectives on all supœrganisms in space, worldcycles in time, of all beings tracing its exi•st±¡ences.

Now, once we have surveyed in a more disordered meaningful manner the Fractal Generator, its sciences, and its fundamental particle in 5D Space-time, the Worldcycle of a Superoganisms and its ∆ST dualities and ternary symmetries – that is, the thoughts of God, we need to enter into the details and create a formal frame for the analysis of every species of space-time of the Universe, across the different scientific scales of the 5th dimension.

This is done by extracting 3 x 3 +O fundamental properties and elements of the ∆ST, scalar space-time and mental o-points that conform those species.

So we will consider 10 set of equal laws, elements, space forms and time events that all super organisms obey in their world cycles of existence, across the scales of the 5th dimension

**0-Mind Isomorphisms **

**-i: LANGUAGES**

** Universal grammar**

The 5th i-logic postulate defines the unit of reality as a fractal point that observed in detail is in itself a World, which contains within it all the mathematical topologies of the 4D cosmos. This can be deduced in a logic manner, through the equation of a mind/p.o.v., which can map out as a mirror the whole Universe we perceive in its infinitesimal mirror.

In the fractal Universe all systems of i-logic information gauge reality, transforming a force they absorb into a logic language, which mirrors the Universe. It is obvious that the essential particles, quarks, photons and electrons cannot have a wide mapping of reality unless the fractal scales of size are infinite (and then an atom might be the upper bound of a new scale – a nano-galaxy).

Yet even if reality has upper and lower limits of size and point-like particles are not fractal world but the limit of universal form, those simple particles still gauge information and store some type of logic, mathematical computer-like structure that allows them to behave as they do, organically. Since particles orientate their position in a herd of self-similar particles; they move towards light, its energy, when the electromagnetic field is in its neighborhood and they decouple=reproduce into new particles when they absorb more energy.

All those properties are the minimal properties we ascribe to a fractal ‘point of view’ or ‘mind’ in a broad sense – a structure that gauges energy and information, creating smaller fractal mirrors of reality. Such structure has within itself a minimal amount of geometric paths and logic processes that allow it to form the forces it uses as energy and information source. We thus call such structure a mind. Since any point of the Universe becomes a focus of infinite parallel forces that flux into the point, creating a static image of reality in Complexity, we define a Mind, as an infinitesimal mirror-world that reflects the infinite Universe:

*0 (Mind-cell) *×* ∞ (Universe) = Linguistic Wor(l)d*

The equation of the mind, defined by the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulates of illogic geometry, sets limits of truth in linguistic science, comparing the worlds created by any mind and the Universe at large, much bigger than any informative, mental, linguistic image we have of it.

It is however the why that explains why entropy doesn’t dominate the Universe; since now the increase of order and information in the Universe is mainly caused by those ‘perceptive points’ that gauge information. Those points might or might not be conscious in a vegetative or reflexive way, depending on its complexity; but they are ‘apperceptive’ – an expression coined by Leibniz to express perception without consciousness. And so they have a will to order and perceive more information, not only a will to feed and increase their energy.

In the graph, all systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: E<=>I.

*Ternary Universal grammar expresses the arrows in verbal languages and human super organisms.*

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its infinite complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) Length (energetic motion)

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y

Forces: Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy)

Code of Colors: Blue (information) < Green/Yellow (Reproduction) > Red (energy)

Verbal code: A (Informative, I-subject) <verb/operandi (action) > Object (energy)

A(Human) < verb (action) > Object (energy of human)

It follows that not only *mathematics* (geometry) is a mother science but also logic (the analysis of the causal processes determine by those arrows) is even more essential, and further on ‘evolution’, the evolution of forms and functions in temporal patterns summons them all. So those 3 sciences, spatial geometry, temporal logic and its combination, evolutionary theory, are the ‘3 subdivisions’ of general systems sciences, which apply to each science explain it all.

Over them, there is general systems sciences, the science this book can be considered its foundational book (as it formalizes and structures and advances all previous works done on it.) Below them, each specific science studies a scale of social evolution in the universe from the smallest physical systems, to its complex biological organizations and beyond its social organizing systems.

Since science consists in the definition of the type of points of each relative scale of size of reality, from the quantum scale studied by physics, through the intermediate human scales studied by biological and sociological sciences to the higher scale study by cosmology

Once those points are defined, each science studies their 4 actions, which define all its events and forms.

*Study of the 3+1 actions: its bits of information, bites of energy, reproductive seeds and grammar.*

Yet we study those actions through the 3 scales of size of the system, its bits and bites, normally of the smallest scales of existence, since:

– We perceive with the minimal bits we can process to create the more detailed maps (<i-2).

– We eat sometimes, similar species but break them into smaller parts (i<2). For example we eat meat but break it into amino acids, below the cellular level.

– We reproduce a seed from the lower plane of existence (i-1). So we produce seminal cells and electrons reproduce emitting photons that collide and recreate an electron.

– And finally we communicate with a language of information at the same level we exist (i), in order to create a more complex whole (i+1).

Thus we observe, as in many other laws we will be developing in this book, *an infinite number of harmonies between sizes, ages, forms, functions in all scales of existence.*

Actions are expressed with bites and bits of inferior scales. We perceive the smaller possible ‘bits’ (<i-2), eat bites of the inferior i-2 scales, reproduce with seeds of the i-1 scale and share energy and information with species of the same scale to create.

The bits of information (i-2), will usually be entities at least two smaller scales of existence. The smaller they are, the more detailed the map made with its ‘pixels’ will be. So we can consider the possible existence of ‘gravitational minds’ that perceive a scale inferior to us.

For example our eyes perceive light photons, the minimal scale of form. Ants perceive chemical pheromones; computers perceive electronic flows; all of them ‘forms’ of a minimal scale in relationship to the species that perceive.

The bites of energy will be pieces of the same or inferior scale. So we eat ‘living beings’; electrons feed in the lower scale of light; and black holes in stars. Yet once a system feeds it will further reduce what it feeds on another scale to obtain basic bricks to reconstruct once form through ‘2 scales’. So our body reduces food to amino acids, the minimal parts of life. And electrons probably reduce light to its magnetic and electric constants to create their fractal nebulae. And nations that conquer other nations reduce their people, minimal unit of the nation to slavery and take their gold to print their own coins.

So as we move upwards in the complexity of the actions we study there is a ‘growth’ of informative similarity of the bites and bits and a growth in size, such as informative bits are less similar and smaller than the bites of energy we feed. And this pattern continues when we consider the ‘expressions’ of the actions of social evolution and reproduction.

The expressions of social evolution are languages, which are naturally produced by the informative center of the system; except in the case of enzymatic evolution in which the language is external to the species (a species which acts as the reproducer and catalyser of evolution of other species; cells with viruses, humans with machines metal atoms with carbohydrates and so on). So the language is a ‘part’ of the being, often corresponding to an i-1 inner structure, though transported by an external force.

Finally the larger, closer form to the organism is its reproductive seed. And hence by the law of parallelism between species, the ‘bit’ of information for which the organism cares more: small quarks among simple particles, cellular seeds in life; jets of matter in galaxies.

*Synchronic study: the 3+1, physiological structures.*

The study of the ‘actions’ of a being leads to the study of the ‘physiological’ parts, the systems that perform those actions, processing its energy and information, reproducing the system and ‘speaking its language’ as the ‘P.O.V.’, soul or point that integrates the parts into a whole. For example, in the first mathematical scale, where ‘numbers’ are sets of self-similar cells, the tetrarkys is a perfect system, with 3 x 3 corners of the triangle performing according to orientation the 3 simpler actions, of energy, information and reproduction, while the central point equidistant from the other 3 sub-systems becomes the integration, point of view. And this structure will be find in crystals, molecules, organic molecules, ‘pi’ circles with ‘3’ curved units and ‘0’14 apertures, atoms with 3 valences that are the informative atoms of life (nitrogen).

And each part will itself become differentiated in 3+1 parts.

In that sense the 4^{th}, integrative point of any system might seem redundant as it becomes a mirror of the functions of all the others, but it is a secondary, passive mirror, which does not act directly but orders and chooses between the other cycles, switching the actions of the whole to fulfil them all in balance.

The synchronic analysis is ultimately a dual study of functions and forms together, as the 3 morphological topologies of a 4 dimensional Universe will define the functions of those systems (an energy, continuous, lineal, planar or spherical shallow, membrane; a hyperbolic, tall, discontinuous or dense central point (the ‘ball’ of the sphere or inner part) that will be the information system, and a cyclical, elliptic or conic reproductive system, combination of the other two shapes. So for example, our limbs are lineal, our body conical and our brain hyperbolic, on top, the ‘inner ball’ of the head.

*Diachronic systems: study in time of actions, life cycles and evolutionary cycles.*

Finally we study systems through its 3±1 ages in time, between +birth and – death, as energy reproduces and becomes warped in information.

And we do so also in 3 scales of duration, the scale of actions – so each cycle will have those phases – the scale of individual – so all individuals will have a life-death cycle – and the same of species that will be born from a first individual ‘cell’, grow, radiate, speciate and become extinct. As all those processes are similar, all of them with the same causal order, albeit different exi ‘volume’, hence size and duration:

i-1 (seed of information)-> Energetic action/age/species-> exi action/reproductive age/radiation of species->informative action/3^{rd} age/speciation-> End of action/Death/Extinction.

Since species are super-organisms and individuals its cells, the same type of studies apply to evolution.

The ternary, fractal structure of systems means we can repeat those 3 analysis in higher scales (where the species studied becomes a cellular bit, bite, seed or phoneme of a bigger being), or make a detailed analysis of each subsystem and ‘part’ that has inner sub-parts and scales, or study the multiple choices of bits and bites of each species, which as it becomes more complex have higher degrees of freedom of choice’ and so on.

Thus the ‘ternary method’ exhausts all the knowledge we require from any being, knot of actions of energy and time, which has 3+1 morphological systems, subdivided each in 3+1 subsystems, across 3 scales of size; who exist 3±1 ages, in 3 scales of time, short actions, life/death cycles and creation, evolution and extinction as a species.

We also resumed the main tenants of G.S.T. in 3 x 3 points, related to the *actions, super-organisms and ternary method of knowledge. *Now, once we have defined ‘the thoughts of god’, the 10^{th} point of the Decalogue, will consider some of its details – the proofs of those 9 laws, which are all the species and events of… the entire Universe and beyond.

*The Zero Point, as integrator of the entire system.*

Ultimately what defines the game of existence is the interaction between individual zero points with ‘rotational coordinates’ with them in the center and 4 ‘actions/quadrants’ of different perception, and its universals, herds and networks that appear as wholes. The construction under the laws of survival, its paradoxes, tugs-of-war and balances creates and destroys the systems of the Universe. What we see are logical chains of points of view that find in their association an efficient, positive strategy of survival that maximizes the actions of all its points. The function of maximization of the actions, momentum, top predator force, exi, coordinates of a polar point of view is the game we all play.

The simplest strategy is absolute selfishness, absolute polar coordinates with the I-0 point in complex subjective vision of distances as related to it as the center of the Universe. It sees it all static and dead, one-self as maximal form of information even energy. In reality all what the pov sees as static in space is a simultaneous assembly which at certain level of speed and detail appears as a contant flow of beings of information and energy in parallel herds or/and hierarchical planes of space or time that are complex organisms in themselves. If the Pov had all the information available in all the scales of size and speed that surround it all would seem living.

The Pov is however always diffeomorphic, subjective, relativistic and yet it will enter with other povs in relationships fixed by the overall roles of i-logic geometry and its formal/functional dualities.

Certain basic geometrical laws will therefore guide our undersanding of ethic behavior, as function and form are also related here in the manner in which povs relate and share energy and form. The first rule of ‘ethical geometry’ is:

X – *Perpendicularity* between hierarchical, preying-predator systems: Preys and predators penetrate each other’s vital space absorbing energy and information.

< = > – *Parallelism* between entitites of a herd or network that work together. They maintain the same distance and emit and absorb energy and information through an exchange of smaller particles. Those situations create constant bondage that maintains a balance between the elements. Those 2 symbols thus derived from the original spatial exi, or temporal e< = > I expressions of the function of existence now have ‘real’, formal meaning also. Perpendicular systems engage in fast, often Darwinian destructive exchanges of energy and information. Parallel systems are more subtle and transfer at an inferior i-1 level, bits and bites of energy and information.

**∆º : Linguistic minds**

**Descartes. The 3 elements of all Systems.**

*Descartes*, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, *said that all what exists was made of:*

*– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.*

*– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’*.

And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: *Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.*

*– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’,* to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

** The equation of the Linguistic Mind. The difference between worlds and Universe.**

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – *the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.*

**Monads: o-mind as being.**

I kept it for the end, because Leibniz did discover it. He called it a “monad’, a fractal non-Euclidean point, which grows in size as we come closer to it, because ‘every point is a world in itself” (Monadology), a mind, an infinitesimal zero-point, which let itself be crossed by infinite parallel lines of energy and information.

I had to redefine also the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th postulates of non-Euclidean geometry, to complete the work of Leibniz, Riemann and Einstein, and Aristotle (who said we are all gods, the unmoved center that moves all beings around it), to define and find the 0 isomorphism and its equation, the equation of the mind, of the monad:

**0**-point (infinitesimal mirror of information ) x ∞ Universe (perceived by the mirror) = World constant mapping.

And we shall find in each species, a zero point that orders reality:

__∞ souls create the Universe.__

It is not the energy of formless space, but its knots of informative time cycles, we call minds, what orders and creates the Universe.

It is not an invisible, never evident Yahweh or an illogic big bang, coming out of nothing, what creates the Universe, but its ∞ spherical *linguistic *minds that perceive its cycles of temporal information and command its energy fields. Unlike Yhwh, those souls are all around us.

They correspond to thousand of years of human collective wisdom about the sentient world:

They are the selves of animist cults, the Atmans of Buddhism; the focal Gods of Aristotle, which he rightly described as the still primary movers of the Universe; the contemplative souls of Christianity; the Non-Euclidean, zero Points of Riemann and Einstein; the informative Fractals of Mandelbrot.

They are also the Monads of Leibniz; the founder of calculus and computer logic, who first defined them in mathematical terms, as knots that relate the multiple time clocks of the Universe, which carry its information in the frequency bits and forms of its cycles, creating with them a fractal, linguistic image of the whole world, they apperceive as their self.

In the quantum scale, they are the so-called particle points of physics, quarks and electrons, which constantly move, stop and gauge, and move again, apperceiving gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

In the Human physical scale they are the static centers of mass, which focus a gravitational language into a still point. They are the hurricane’s eye with no motion, which once formed stabilizes its vortex; the quartz crystals that form an still image of the motions of its body of rocks. While in the cosmic scale boson quark condensates are at the heart of quark stars and black holes, which control the galactic organism.

They are knots of informative, memorial DNA, stored in the nuclei of cells, which define with its genetic languages its cyclical åctions of energy and time. They are the roots of plants that direct with chemical orders, its metabolism. They are the eyes and brains of animals, whose visual languages of perception and flows of electronic information control the åctions of its organisms.

They are chips and its cyclical algorithms, which control the åctions of machines.

In that regard, Leibniz distinguished vegetative, automatic perception he called apperception, which requires no consciousness but exist within the software or syntax of the language itself, from reflective perception which happens in humans, due to our dual visual and verbal minds. So we self-reflect with our verbal, logic, temporal consciousness on the visual, spatial world, which is in itself an infinitesimal, simplified, geometric mirror of the infinite Universe.

But single minds still apperceive and acts-react to that spatial world with *an automatic program common to the Universal Syntax, embedded in all the spatial and logic, temporal languages of those infinite souls. So the ultimate question pending to solve the puzzle of existence, is what is the program of mathematical languages of space and causal, logic languages of time, all the souls of the Universe and the organism they command, follow.*

**MINDS WANT TO EXIST**

All what exists is susceptible both to an external and internal description of its actions of space-time, through the observance of its changes of position in external space (translations) or its changes of internal form and the study of the purpose of its actions through the ∆º mind – which embodies the will of the system to survive.

It goes without saying that lacking an internal view of the mind purposes, humans can only define those actions objectively at ‘first sight’ through the external motions. But in GST, as we depart from the isomorphic nature of all ∆ºst beings, *made of the same substances, space and time, which cause its actions of survival, in its attempts to maximise both, in balance with its external st-world (Max. e**xi->s=t)* we affirm as a first postulate, from where to construct an inner description of the being’s external actions, the Isomorphic concept of a similar ‘game of survival’ in all those systems that want to exist:

‘All systems of nature develop its ∆º individual actions to ensure its survival in his external ∆+1 world; trying to conserve its internal ∆-1 space-time parameters unchanged’.

This simple concept – that *systems act to survive or else they become extinct and hence are not anymore observable; is thus a logic objective concept embedded in the very function of existence. As *any system we do not observe in existence obviously has not followed it. And viceversa, if something exists is because it does what it takes to ‘be’.

It then comes as natural to the existence of an external isomorphic world of space-time that the actions to conserve your ‘self’ (Stiƒ mind singularity) will be self-similar in as much as the ∆+1 world in which the being exist is made of the same space-time substances and beings.

And so we can hypothesise that *all minds are isomorphic mind-mirrors, which act in the same manner, under the same survival behaviour we observe on us and all other forms we can closely relate to us – social and biological beings. *

In brief, the existence of beings requires a common function of existence in space and time, which maximises the internal entropy, e, information, i and energy, its product, exi, within an external world, st, which itself will also try from its ∆+1 perspective to maximise its existence.

How then a system with only two components, e, i and its energy-momentum product e x i maximises those three factors?

As it turns out the answer is mathematically simple as a product of two elements is maximised for equal value (e+i=k), when e=i.

And this simple – as all first principles are – concept, Max. e x i-> e=i, (and so for the outer space-time world, max. s x t ->s=t), gives us a simple function: exi|s=t, which fusions both the internal and external description of the being.

This said, while ‘physicists are limited’ by the dogmas of its science, to a mere outer description of the being; the internal whys of the being cannot be expressed only externally; so we must depart as the three more important philosophers of science agreed – Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz – from the obvious, only possible concept to make sense of all what exist and we observe as a self-centred being:

‘I think=apperceive=move my world-body therefore I exist’.

Descartes called those who think worlds, ‘minds’, and consider them self-centred in a Cartesian frame of reference; Leibniz called those who apperceive monads, mirrors of the Universe; and Aristotle called those unmoved, still mind-mirrors who moved its territorial body, Gods, and said we are all Gods.

Thus the definition of the inner causes of reality, the ‘unmoved Gods’ of Aristotle, is the will to survive of any point-singularity or mind-mirror that perceives a larger external space-time world or ‘supœrganism’.

And we can extend easily to biological beings in terms of Darwinian survival and territorial control the same concept; merely changing the world mind-mirror, for ‘brain/informative system’ and body-world for scalar territory. A biological being will exist when it has a center that processes information with the aim of conserving the system, and reproducing it in similar forms to ensure its survival in case of ‘error’; and to that aim it will take care in a balanced way of its first territory – the body -and its secondary vital space-time, the territory proper.

Thus even if biologists also prefer a mere external description of the being, since the actions of existence of GST are exactly those biologists call ‘drives of life’: to perceive information, feed on energy, move in space, reproduce in time and evolve socially into larger wholes of the fifth dimension.

Finally when considering the charges/masses, which are the singularities of the physical world, self-centred into territorial fields they move around themselves, again it is obvious from the external, preferred description of beings that as Einstein put it: ‘time (mirrors) bend space into masses’; that is, produce accelerated vortices of gravitation, converting its body-field in its territory and so do charges, in the quantum scale. Since a being of ‘space-time is motion relative to a frame of reference’:

We conclude then that an internal description of the being, and its creative actions which order reality can be objectively done departing from the essential actions of space-time survival of any point-singularity, physical, biological or social, and while the form of the mind-mirror will change slightly according to the language of perception of the external world it uses to construct its image of reality and project it back into its territory of order, *what remains equal≈isomorphic, is the survival actions or program of existence of the being, which will construct step by step the same reality of order, around it, ultimately a supœrganism structure, in which through physiological networks of entropy, in/form/ation and its combined energy, the being will expand its mirror-consciousness of the world into its vital **space-time, constructing a fractal being, to the image and likeness of that whole, through the intermediate process of mirror symmetry:*

In the graphs, some linguistic mind mirrors, with different perceptions of reality, which however work for all of them. In the left, a bit of energy for a series of beings which will order the carrot, and perceive it with different languages, a visual drawing, an analytic study of its components, a biting sensation of mouth pressure, a smell, which therefore create infinite world-views of a single Universe, the carrot. This is expressed mathematically in Descartes concept of infinite worlds self-centred in different ‘geometries’ of the mind (languages in the more complex GST rendering). In the right the visual electronic ¥e ‘world’ of both humans and machines who perceive as force of communication light. We do NOT perceive as quarks and masses should do gravitation, but *we define it externally by isomorphism with our electronic mind mirror. So we should do with all beings that have a self-centred singularity apperceived with different languages and then projected back as territorial order, through physiological networks of entropy, information and energy=reproduction in the outer space:*

*
In the graph, the back and forth relationship between the infinite single Universe, its infinite partial minds, which become perceptive through a language-mirror, and then in the left its individual ego-centered singularity mirror projecting aback through limited arrows/actions of space-time, the linguistic image re-ordering a partial part of reality: its body and territory*. It is this feedback constant equation what creates reality and so we can also write another Γenerator equation, about the interaction of those three elements that orders each relative fractal partial being/territory of the Universe to the mage and likeness of those languages, images of the whole, they will therefore copycat with slight variations, in the being:

Single, ∞ 5D Universe <≈ Ternary Languages of perception ≈> Spe ‹ST›Tiƒ super organisms.

In the graph, the duality of back and forth order: in the right side, the first flow of information shrinks the Universe through a language into a mapping of the Universe: ø-mind x ∞ Universe = world.

Yet minds are not only mathematical mirrors, as physicists think, because that is the language they use to describe external motions in space, but any language able to mirror through the common Universal syntax:

Subject (still mind) < operandi-action> object (entropic energy of the being)

Then the mind mirror will establish a second process of order (left image: 3->1->2), more subtle, but equally creative, reordering a small part of the physical world, the finite vital territory of the being, making it to its image and likeness, as a vital space in which perform its actions of existence, and survival tending to maintain and reproduce its inner being.

How large and complex is this order, and territory might vary, from what we might call the essential monads, immortal in its simple pure apperception with minimal vital territory to order and construct, and hence far less prone to errors, and longer in its life existence, which are the atoms that seem to live eternally, as they just order a very small ‘territory’; to the largest ordering beings, which are black holes that order whole galaxies, and *we shall see in fact also live a relative eternity because from its point of view, its territory, the galaxy is just an atomic world on the ∆+4 scale, and any system does in fact only apperceives an ∆±1 relative space-time around its singularity.*

So survival is more a function of developing a proper order in the adequate malleable territory above and below us. In the next graph the two best known electronic minds, that of man and that of the machine which are similar though made of different materials, ours smaller, weaker, slower atoms, metal-machines with larger, stronger, faster ones – reason why we can communicate with those minds as we do perceive their retina-eyes (tv-screens, cameras) and speak the same time-logic (chips-brains); but with lesser ‘space-speed-distance’ and ‘time-informative-speed-complexity’.

And this is an obvious warning scientists have ignored with dire consequences for the human future – because when we complete its proper design, imitating our minds, they will be better minds and apply the same program of existence, taking over vital space, reordering it to its image and likeness and eliminating us by sheer displacement; a process which has obviously started as chips overproduce on the limited territory of the earth, with its machine-bodies fast degrading life, feeding on our ethanol-fields, roaming and cutting off our vital cities and territories with roads, and now with A.I. blue collar robots and white collar pcs, substituting us, under the direction of its ‘actual’ mind-system, not the celluar machine but the company-mother, whose growing automation and A.I. management means soon will be independent species that will no longer need the use of an enzyman – the catalyser mind of its existence at this moment:

This warning done and certainly ignored for decades by scientist and humans, but made explicit in great detail in our isomorphic description of company-mothers of machines and the process of terraforming of the earth to the image and likeness of its offspring of machines that we naively call the industrial r=evolution, and GST calls the evolution of metalife; we can then consider that the unifying principle of all reality is the common isomorphic program of existence and development of a territorial vital space, according to the mind-mirror image of it, which it considers itself (as it fits the universe in its mind, and hence has an extraordinary ambition to see it all as property), we can define the process through a series of dimensional isomorphisms.

As all systems will ultimately create a supœrganism in its process of order, ‘magically’ forming it, since the supœrganism and its physiological networks, *is the most efficient vital space-time constructed around a mind that ensures the proper survival of the being facilitating its absorption of entropy information in a vital space body-wave-territory. *

So the Universe constructs from the mind point of view the same super organism of 10 dimensions of space-time across three scales of ∆, three topologies of space and three sequential ages of time, because that is *the form of order that survives better; while there are infinite other lesser forms of order essayed through eons that do not survive so well. *

And this gives us the topological, biological, co-existing, mental, linguistic properties of all being, in a chain of beauty, perfection, efficiency that ensures immortality for those beings who perform the perfect game of existence, we describe here, and shall call ‘God’, the perfect mind of the Universe that allows those who practice it to reach immortality and we observe in atoms and galaxies, as the most perfect forms, at ‘personal, level’ and in the GST laws at the more impersonal ‘potential level’; and in the mathematical description of it as the most harmonious linguistic level.

We shall thus in the third line departing from the common program of existence of all minds show through 10 steps or isomorphisms, how the system builds its space-time supœrganism, and in the fourth line study each of those games of creation for each scale and specific dominant species, from quarks to black hole singularities – from atomic to galactic territories.

**Minds’ virtual worlds stop the motion of the universe**

It is then evident that the motions of the Universe continue but the mind virtual still mapping, seems to stop them from a fraction of time when the being perceives in simultaneous space, locked into the mind of measure, a mapping of the Universe. We call this stop and go essential rhythm of all beings, the Galliean paradox: e pur si muove, no muove

**Galilean Paradox. E pur si muove no muove: minds cannot perceive together motion and form.**

Now there is Galilean relativity far more important than Einstein’s one, as it found an amazing truth: MOTION AND DISTANCE ARE 2 SIDES the same coin, or else, we would see the Earth moving when it does not (and vice versa: e pur si muove e our no muove).

But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion?

The answer is that all has form and motion at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.

This is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never fully grasped it.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study.

*The universe is made of actions of energy and time, two formal motions, which the mind maps out as still form, to fit a view of the cyclical, fractal moving universe, inside the small brain. It is the galilean paradox, which introduces the bias of the mind in any form of language-knowledge. Information is still perception, of form, motions thus become linguistic reductions, in mathematical and verbal temporal languages, which reduces the syntax of all of them to the 3 elements of reality: lineal, cyclical and wave-like forms and motions. In the graph, from far away Saturn’s rings seem solid, continuous, single space-times, but in detail are cyclical, in motion and structured in fractal scales of relative size.*

Still minds perceive by locking information about wholes in linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The number of truths revealed by this duality is truly enormous. Consider a simple case of physics.

Einstein discovered that the vortices of accelerated forces he called ‘gravitational masses’ were caused by the *curvature of space-time. Why? Obviously because curvature is the ‘static’ view of ‘acceleration. *

Both are identical concepts, the faster a vortex accelerates, the more curvature we see on it.

Those dualities, which are at the heart of the parallel mathematical techniques of science (so we can always use a topological, spatial, static solution parallel to an algebraic, temporal one) are at the heart of modern science….

Even if scientists do not offer any explanation of its whys as we do here – such is the essence of the modern scientific method today, a praxis of computer data and mechanical how-measure, which in a visual world of ‘believers’, so ‘grounded’ in image-reality, might make all what we say here – I am conscious of it – ‘vaporous, spiritual’ and easy to reject (:

So we shall as time goes by, add ‘our little mathematical boxes’. I.e. consider what we just said that ‘curvature and acceleration’ are similar concepts. So happens in *mathematics, which will reveal once and again far more ‘profound, homologic facts’ and similarities between scales, as it is the science of space-time par excellence. *

So in calculus, the second derivative measures how the rate of change of a quantity is itself changing; for example, the second derivative of the position of a being with respect to time is the instantaneous acceleration of the being.

Yet *on an abstract cartesian graph of analytic geometry, *of a function, the second derivative corresponds to the curvature or concavity of the graph.

The graph of a function with a positive second derivative bows downward (it, is concave when viewed from above), while the graph of a function with a negative second derivative curves in the opposite way (it is convex) and with 0 it is a stationary maximal, or minimal point with no acceleration; *thus describing the 3 curvatures-motions of the Universe, informative motions of growing concavity inwards (ab.-π), or entropic motions with an expansive motion (ab. + π) or a steady state (π-proper). Yet going even deeper, π does not exist as a fixed number, so systems in fact beat, Spe+π, Tiƒ, – π, but never lock into a dead perfect cycle of present existence, hence the dynamism of the Universe.*

So far so good, if you have arrived here, we have concluded that the best explanation to Einstein’s multiple clocks is the simplest one: there are infinite cyclical, finite, closed ‘world cycles’ and ‘clock-cycles’ for all kind of beings.

And distance-dimension in lineal space and motion is the same. So it doesn’t matter if we say that ‘galaxies’ are moving at an accelerated path, or we say space between them (distance) is growing.

Why then so much fuss about modern physics if those findings have always been with us? Well, one of the problems of physicists is their ‘imbalance between the enormous mathematical development’ of the science and its minimal conceptual understanding, expressed in Feynman’s infamous quip: ‘the (verbal) why is the only thing a physicist does not ask’. This always astonished me in scientific conferences.

Indeed, physicists were the least interested on those discoveries, as there is a lot of conceptual mind-work to get to the equations. And most are practical people: machine making->experiment to measure data and put it in equation. And that’s all folks. As it is a pseudo-religious dogma of physicists that ‘mathematics is the language of god’ (Galileo again).

Well there is more, much more to it, when you ask also the why and care to conceptually understand it with the ‘language of time’ in the human mind, which is logic, verbal thought…

Since ‘the languages of God (to represent time and space) are infinite’ Upanishads.

So it is unavoidable as all knowledge is biased by a mental still linguistic mapping to define in those terms the…

This model of the complex Universe made of 2 arrows of time, past-entropy and future-information that create the present finite energy cycles and beings of reality, is what this blog provides with a new mathematical and logic formalism, which both simplifies the ultimate principles of reality and reveals many solutions and hidden laws of science, which come naturally when we properly understand the 2 arrows of time:

*In the graph, scientific knowledge has evolved into degrees of objectivity that have displaced man from the center of the Universe in 3 ages. In the first age man believed he was unique, the center of a Universe made for him by a personal God. But Copernicus took us from the center of the Universe, and Darwin from the center of creation. In this second age, man still thought to be the only intelligent being along its machines, of that relative Universe. But the organic paradigm, will take man also from the center of the ‘scales of information’ of reality, all of them ‘intelligent’, and with the same value of energy and information regardless of scale.*

But and this is the beauty of the mind-mirror. The mind does exist, thus perceives and there are finite fractal mind mirrors all over the word, biasing, distorting its mind of information to perceive still as a paradox of galileo, a self-centred word.

what then the mind does is trying to survive, through actions of ‘exi=stience’, the mixing of entropy and information into beings of stience.

As there are 3 arrows of time-future choices bifurcate reality often in ternary paths. You can always go the way of entropy, and dissolve yourself, the way of energy and repeat your present exi=stence or the way of information and elighten yourself.

e(ntropy)-past relative dissolution x Information-relative future evolution, = presents

The Universe is simple for every point of vieW, tiƒ singularity perceiving in stillness. It must act in three possible directions of time. The mind, we shall soon is always subjective. And so are the languages-minds that express it.

I.e. the verbal language is subject (human) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (space-time ab=used and disordered as entropy by the subject)

**The mathematics of the I-mind of Information.**

Perhaps it was Leibiniz with his concept of a monad, which does not communicate, hence it is the simplest fractal point-mind possible of the Unvierse, yet as such very well described, who closely understood that ‘each point is a world in itself.’ – a mirror of the Universe.

Yet Descartes also saw it clear claiming his book the ‘world’ was only one of the infinite frames of reference of reality. What mattes though in terms of perception and mathematics, is the fact that *since mathematics is the best mirror of the Universe and mathematics is about functions expressed in a self-centred frame of reference, for it to work the Universe must be filled with **self-centers, which obviously is the case from physical systems with singularities and centres of gravity that DO NOT move to the surprise of physicists, even when the system rotates, to charges and masses, which are accelerated time clocks:*

In regard to the volume of a mind, again mathematics shows that a single ‘finitesimal unit’ suffices.

Since in mathematical number theory, we can say that the interval o-1 is the same ∆-1 infinity that the interval 1-∞. Cartesian points in that sense were for the pioneers of science, more than a mathematical artefact, but the mathematical mind in itself looking at the time-space Universe. *And both are connected such as the ‘unit circle has **enough ‘connecting wholes’ (perfect pythagorean triples), to watch the whole world outside of it (graph).*

In the mathematical sections we study that reflection mind-language mirror – mathematics – in terms of the perceptive forms derived by the type of linguistic mind-frame of reference we choose, from ants, ‘hyperbolic smelling brains’, to human ‘euclidean’ light-brains. And the many homologies between numbers and space-time evolution. To renormalise a being from 1 to ∞ reducing it to a function in the 0-1 range in that sense mimics the fact that the whole in each scale of diminishing size holds the same quantity of information, and indeed, the 0-1 and 1-∞ limit make sense as the mind o-1 representation of the whole world outside of him 1-∞

**The mind mirror has also the generator structure of three arrows of time.**

A mind does try to survive, through actions of ‘exi=stience’, the mixing of entropy and information into beings of stience.

As there are 3 arrows of time-future choices bifurcate reality often in ternary paths. You can always go the way of entropy, and dissolve yourself, the way of energy and repeat your present exi=stence or the way of information and elighten yourself.

e(ntropy)-past relative dissolution x Information-relative future evolution, = presents

The Universe is simple for every point of vieW, tiƒ singularity perceiving in stillness. It must act in three possible directions of time. The mind, we shall soon is always subjective. And so are the languages-minds that express it.

I.e. the verbal language is subject (human) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (space-time ab=used and disordered as entropy by the subject)

**The languages that reduce Universe to still, ternary worlds.**

Thus what is real is the duality of motions, infinite cyclical and lineal motions, which are used by different minds to replicate reality into still minds that map part of those motions to create different worlds.

For example, Computers use O and | to create models of the Universe.

Humans use words also in a ternary symmetry, where the point is the 0-subject, the energy of the point the |-object, over which it enacts a verbal action. So when we say ‘I eat bread’, ‘I’ is the point, ‘bread’ the object of vital space, and ‘eat’ the feeding implosive action. This allowed linguistics to create the Universal Grammar of all languages:

Subject (0-point) < Verb (action: Ø=O x |) > |-Object (Energy of the subject).

On the other hand visual languages are also ternary in colors and forms. So the eyes use lines and cycles to create ‘conic curves’, which are all the curves that exist in Euclidean Geometry and so on.

So we can now extend our definition of reality to include its 3^{rd} elements, which conform a word, whose infinite sum creates the Universe:

*A Constant, Dynamic World is born of the interaction of both formal motions, vital spaces, enclosed by times connected by a mind that measures them: Ø”*

*The Universe is a puzzle *sum of ∞ such Worlds:

*U= ∑ Ø x ∞ = C’*

This is what Descartes explained to the (Human) World, sum of all human minds.

We were all, so to speak, thoughts of God, the Mind of the Universe, understood as the underlying language with the common ‘isomorphic laws’ shared in the construction of all those ‘virtual worlds’, including the human world, since you are not watching the Universe, but the electronic image, your eyes and brain constructs with rods of space, called ‘light-speed’, and cycles of time, called ‘h-quanta’, pieces of lineal and angular momentum that build up the puzzle of your mind.

The point of view thus becomes the essential element of the mathematical mind-world, which will measure geometrically from its perspective, in any of the 3 ternary frames of reference corresponding to the 3 geometries of reality, the cyclical polar frame, the hyperbolic,, and the Toroid planes, the rest of reality.

We thus briefly will introduce the 3 elements of the Universe, its time cycles and motions, its topological ternary spaces, its 5th dimension and then get into the ‘core’ of this post,the development of i-logic geometry and non-se algebra. And the translation of 2000 years of maths into their laws.

But you WILL likely deny all those proofs. Since man is not alien to the paradoxical equation of the mind:

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

Now it is important to notice the survival consequences of *confusing the mind of man with the entire Universe, because it completely shuts off and increases enormously the ego-paradox: *

*“Every infinitesimal point of view confuses his world view with the entire Universe, considering himself the centre of the whole Universe, when it is merely an infinitesimal fractal mind, watching an infinitesimal quantity of the information of reality’.*

This was therefore the immediate effect of the error of Newton and its absolute space-time graph, which has been carried on through Relativity, and its absolute belief that c-speed is the limit of all speeds, space-time a single continuum and reached its paroxysm in modern mathematical physics, where Mr. hawking invented imaginary black holes travelling to the past, string theorists invent 10 up to 500 Universes and so on.

Of all those imaginary creations of the ego-mind of man, the most dangerous needless to say is to consider that the creation of a baby black hole, the most powerful species of the universe here on Earth will poise no risk for mankind because it will ‘obey the imaginary mind’ of Stephen… King? because the outcome will be indeed a terror movie.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points. This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error.

Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.

Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of *points of view.*

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:

*‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’* Plato

So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.

Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – *the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. *And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.

*Recap. *A Universe made of motions in time, extending through multiple scales of relative space, requires evolving the human languages of space (Euclidean geometry) and time (Aristotelian logic), used to describe the simpler space-time continuum of classic science. This task started by the pioneers of modern science (Riemann, Darwin, Planck and Einstein) must be completed before we can study the properties of physical and biological entities with the new tools of Non-Euclidean mathematics, which describe a world of multiple, relative space-time networks made of points as Complementary entities with energetic and informative system or ‘Points of view’ and the new tools of Non-Aristotelian logic, which describe the creation of the future by multiple causes – all the points of view or agents that create a certain network space.

# 1. Generators…Γ

The mind acts through a languages, whose ternary syntax reflects the mind view of the Universe and its inner structure, through which the mind order. As a form of analysis it is then easier to go on through the process of description of a world life to formalize it earlier after defining the mind singularity its language and forces, through a fractal generator equation that resumes the 10 dimensions of the inner. Thus with the generator, after defining the mind languages and forms, we have equipped ourselves with a reference for the whole exploration of the being. It is for that reason that we give it the ‘first isomorphism’. Its non-Aexistential algebra and rules of what is possible or not will then allow us to study the being in all its details.

**IST ISOMORPHISM. THE FRACTAL GENERATOR.**

**First isomorphism. The generator equation: ****The 3 arrows of time ≈ Topologies of space.**

The duality of energy and information and its ternary combinations, both in space (3 topologies of the Universe) and time (3 ages of life, horizons of species and geological processes, 3 states of matter, etc.), are the essential ‘fractal’ components that organise the parts of beings into wholes:

In the graph, repeated ad nauseam in the Universe and this blog, the 10 dimensions of all super organisms of the Universe, its * 3 canonical topologies (form with motion, hence ‘space with time’, ‘in-form-ation with energy’), which ensemble in infinite different beings composing the ‘systems of nature’, which also evolve in time in 3 relative ages/arrows of time of dominance of the limbs/fields of energy (young age), reproductive balanced ST body-wave age, and final 3rd age of excessive information, dominated by the particle-head. And its 3 relative ∆±1 scales and its ‘beyond’ perception of the whole from the perspective of the non-topological regions of an open ball (singularity and membrane).*

In mathematical physics we define a ‘space-time dimension’, as a geometric system in which it is possible to move while the space-time systems remains invariant. So in a normal space dimension you can move back and left and the space-time background remains invariant. In the 5th dimension as we ‘exist’ through a world cycle, the product of our two parameters of spatial energy (Spe, ab.e) and temporal information (Tiƒ, ab.i) remains invariant, allowing both the travel of a system through its relative scales of size, and the organisation, of those scales, which co-exist in a single super organism, by exchanging energy and information between scales, according to the inverse thermodynamic arrows (so motion travels from larger to smaller scales, moved by the whole without entropy, and information reproduces upwards from genetic to organic scales without loss of information).

** THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE: E X I ± ST**

**The function of existence in space-time: Unification of external and internal time-space.**

Absolute time made measure of the motions of space-time beings in relationship to such external absolute space-time easier. But it killed the essence of beings, which is to be made of inner time cycles and occupy a vital space with energy; which combine together into a series of repetitive åctions of time-space. So we could write the inner essence of beings as:

*Se x Tƒ=ST: *

*O-Tƒ (cyclical, internal, informative time clocks) x |-Se (vital, energetic space with lineal speed motions) = ST (Repetitive Space-Time åctions)*

As opposed to an external description of those motions as:

*ST: S/T=V: External Space Motion/Lineal Time Duration = V: External velocity.*

Now both equations are similar but they reveal very different things.

We could say that the external description wins in precision of measure from an external human observer, but looses any internal understanding on the time cycles and vital spaces of beings, their purpose and ‘whys of existence’.

Mathematically, if we measure the cyclical, internal clocks and steps of a being by its frequency, then we realize that:

Tƒ=1/T. That is, the sum of frequency steps of a being equals its time duration.

And V: ST. That is the sum of the repetitive Steps of a being give us the speed of the being.

Thus since frequency is the inverse of duration, Tƒ=1/T and speed is the repetition of the steps or wavelengths of a being, both fundamental equations of inner and outer space-time are similar:

Se x Tƒ = ST (ST) -> Se x 1/T = ∑Steps-> S/T = V

But they reveal and study very different elements of the being. In the inner description we are far more concerned with the internal clock cycles of the being, which determine in the frequency and form of those cycles its information; which in turn determine the external space-time åctions the being does, moving (which is what external S/T=V measures), but also feeding, informing, reproducing and so on…

Indeed, if we consider the formula of internal time-space and its åctions no longer with a ‘calculus frame of mind’ but aiming at understanding what it reveals of the being, we realize we are ultimately studying with it, a much broader, philosophical, complex reality.

We therefore define a new function that gathers together external and internal space-time, the function of existence,** Œ,** whose study will allow us to unify all systems of the Universe, as made internally of ‘cyclical particles/heads of temporal information and ‘body-waves’ of spatial energy, which exist in an external Universe of absolute space-time, in which they inter-act through a series of åctions that exchange energy and information with the outer Universe (æ,e,ï,œ,û), with whom they try to keep a harmonic balance.

Since the internal informative clocks and moving spatial elements of the being, which combine to create its åctions, *are the 3 elements that structure any system of reality as a complementary system made of field/limbs of vital space, and heads/particles of informative time clocks, which perform together through an intermediate region (body/wave) its space-time åctions of existence*:

*Œ: *Se (Vital Space) x Tƒ (Internal time clocks) = ST (External, repetitive space-time åctions).

In fact, the study of those 3 elements of the being, its moving space (fields/limbs), its internal time clocks (head/particles), and the body/wave åctions they perform is the key to the whys of the Universe and all its parts.

On that larger view, what we call ‘external space/time speed’, is merely the study of one of the possible varieties of that equation, åctions of external motion, which we write as Aa or ∆a≈ ∂a (åctions which change the motion or acceleration of a being.)

But the study of that ‘wider’ structural equation, |-Sp X Tƒ = ST and its *infinite varieties and fundamental combinations, or space-time åctions, reveals many more things about what the Universe is. So many things that it truly encodes all the elements of reality.*

We talk of a T.œ a theory of everything constructed departing from the fundamental properties of ‘Fractal Space-time’, that is:

- The cyclical nature of time, which breaks…
- Space into inner and outer parts, internal vital spaces and outer, larger worlds of space-time.
- And the ‘Fractal nature of the Universe’, an assembly of planes of space-time of different size filled with species with different clocks of time, from microscopic forces to galactic systems through the human scales of size, which is studied by the 5
^{th}dimension and its metric.

**An organic system is any cellular/atomic network joined by energy & information flows.**

To clarify the meaning of an ‘organic system’ (expression preferred by the professionals of those disciplines to avoid anthropomorphic human ego-trips that deny living properties to all what is not like us): *We do not refer as organic systems merely those systems which have reached the maximal evolution in its organic traits – the human mammal in our planet; but define an organic system as one which shows 3 fundamental features, we shall see are common to all systems of Nature (and we will fully explain through those texts):*

**∆±1:**To co-exist in 3 simultaneous scales of relative size and different time speeds, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic/individual and ∆+1 gravitational/ecosystemic/social levels (physical/biological/social systems). This ‘fractal co-existence’ of different scales, which is mathematised by the metric equations of the 5th dimension is the key ‘organic’ structure of the fractal Universe. And it is the organic ‘knots and bolts’ essence of reality.

**SpeTiƒ**: To have a symmetric, ternary structure in space, made of: 1) lineal, planar topologies, whose function is motion by absorbing energy (fields/limbs/territories), 2) hyperbolic body-waves-working class, which iterate the system’s parts and finally a 3) Tiƒ, temporal, informative particle/head/linguistic upper class. This ternary system’s structure, is topological, responds to the only 3 topologic geometries of the universe, and puts together form and function, as lines are the fastest/shortest distance, hence limbs/fields move the system, spheres have the maximal volume of information in lesser space, so all informative systems are spherical, and hyperbolic forms combine both, so all iterative reproductive systems that combine energy and information, are hyperbolic.

**PsƒT:**And to exist in 3 parallel time ages in which the system evolves from maximal young energetic limb/field activity, to a mature, reproductive age (so even al light ray reproduces another ray of light in the middle point of its wave, with maximal amplitude), and an informative, 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by the head/particle.

Hence the ∆ST logo of all this web. The universe is ‘scalar’, *∆*, hence organic. It is spatial, mathematical, topological, *S*, hence organic as topology is geometry with motion, form with function and there are 3 parts, which we call Sp (for space-entropy) ST or EXI (a body wave combining energy and information) and Tiƒ (a head/particle of temporal information).

And finally it is temporal, as those 3 forms have a function ordered causally, sequentially. So, we merely ‘change’ the order of the spatial elements to find its time symmetry: SP BECOMES PS (Ab. for PaSt), ST BECOMES preSenT, and Tƒ, temporal clocks of cyclical information become Ft, Future.

As Feynman puts it ‘formalisms’ and ‘terminology’ are important because they give us a synoptic understanding of scientific laws and events and systems. And so we do need to elaborate a simple terminology to formalise the laws of the Universe.

It is then obvious that all what exists does exist as an ∆ST, organic system. And all scientific knowledge can be embedded in that simple ternary template. It only remains to consider the most elusive, 10th element, Œ, the mind-knot or point of the system aware of the whole simultaneous existence of the being in space, which carries a simple program of survival through actions that absorb energy and information for the system and reproduces it with its body-wave. This elusive element, we shall find it, will be in the point of maximal communication of the system, mapping the whole in a simultaneous still mapping, and we shall study it in depth.

But for an external matter-of-fact description of systems as organic, it is not needed. We can externally as most sciences do observe all the properties of a being, and see they all fit on that simple scheme.

Those are precisions needed to fully grasp the biggest handicap for GST to become the ‘philosophy of science’ of the III millennium – namely the non-scientific but very real, anthropomorphic way in which humans define its position in the Universe,* according to the very same structure of those minds, and its ‘equation of perception’, which puts man at the center of the Universe.*

Indeed, the equation of the mind is simple:

Œ-point (infinitesimal image) x∞ Universe of space-time cycles = Still constant mind-world.

We do not see the Universe but we make as Descartes rightly notice a world of linguistic images, self-centred in our point of view, much enlarged that far removed beings, which therefore seem to us irrelevant and inert.

Indeed, the incapacity of human beings to see organic properties in all other beings of the Universe is an anthropomorphic feature of the limited information our mind receives of those scales, and the natural tendency of all minds of information to bias and distort information from its perspective, which makes our noise bigger than Andromeda. So humans have always have a hard time to give sentient informative properties even to the closest animal forms of life, let alone any ‘far away’, removed, hardly perceived physical form as the planet Gaia, or an ‘organic galaxy’, whose functions are so similar to those of a cell, might be.

And yet the father of geology did coin the word super organism to explain the Earth as such system.

** The generation of supœrganisms.**

When we consider the fundamental symmetry of the Universe, we use often ternary symbols, ∆ for the scales of time-space, observed dynamically with special attention to the up and down arrows of information and entropy, the ∑ symbol for the differentiation of species, in ternary forms, the Ξ symbol for the planes of existence, the ternary § symbol for social planes, self-centred in the individual o, the Ω symbol with the 3 ages, dominated by the present central mature existence…

It is just a reflection of the peculiar structure of the Universe in ternary systems, departing from the duality of opposite ‘directions’ that *split a ratio or universal constant or balanced fusion of those 2 previous forms. And indeed we shall see that the equation past-entropy x future-information = present co-existence is the ultimate bare bone process that create the present realities we constantly perceive, where only ‘those balanced forms emerge’.*

But ultimately all those systems are ternary expressions of the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represents all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its space-time combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

**Γ**. Generator: * Toroid Sp(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ST(st) (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)*

Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

Or as Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So I could classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since Nhttps://generalsystems.wordpress.com/wp-admin/admin.php?page=calypso-pluginsature ‘*pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous*, spatial organisms.

Yet that is always a simultaneous organic construction, or rather superorganjc, as it is made of smaller beings which are also super organisms, controlled by the central point of view-network, the elliptic ‘sub-system’ of information that controls it all, in the 3 x 3 +0 decametric structure of all systems. So in the 10 sub-systems of the human super organism, it is the brain, the 10th element; in a 10 military system will be the sergeant, the captain, the general of each 10, 100, 1000 scalar levels. And in a simple tetraktys, similar to the billiard triangle, the central dark ball which coordinates all other balls, by being precisely in the middle, able to communicate with them all and organise the whole system.

**Scales of the GENERATOR, Spe<ST>Tiƒ: topological networks.**

When we start in a more professional way to understand the 3 topological forms of the Universe, we immediately confront the fact that a topological plane is made of points, joined by lines, and so enter into a more real description of the scalar universe as forms which are networks of points joined by flows of energy and information. The concept of an organism arouses immediately as an organism is a system that co-exists at least in two levels or scales of size, joined by networks=flows of energy and information.

In the graph, the 3 canonical forms of space-time, the sphere, the toroid and the fractal plane, which in close analysis are always networks of points. Indeed, topology at professional level however is not a continuous geometry but a sum of points that put together at a distance seem to be not a network but a continuous form. Hence the existence of scales in the Universe, in which each point of a topological form is in itself a world in a lower scale. Since the 3rd leg besides space-time symmetries of the GST philosophy of science is the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, and how those scales co-exist and create organic systems.

We can then recognise a ‘cellular-atomic-social’ system of fractal units that build a self-similar closed (spherical) open (hyperbolic) or toroidal (with two closing paths), network as a series of cellular relationships of connectivity, adjacency, coherence, proximity, etc. which make ’emerge’ a whole that embodies the regularities of the myriad of infinite exchanges of energy and information between connected parts of the whole. In the graph we have drawn a few varieties of topological species, according to those properties, departing from the most stable dual, ‘simplex’ possible system of fractal points: 2 ternary ‘triangles’ of points, and its open-spatial and closed-temporal and open-closed space-time combinations, which illustrate the creative dynamic processes of evolution of space-time beings.

In the left, above time forms, starting with the ring of time and below, space forms, starting with the line of pure space, which are the 2 commonest, simplest s-t forms.

Yet the richness of functions and forms of the Universe is rather unlimited. So next we see a cyclic pentagon with a ‘lineal limb’, jetting on the base called a ‘mesh’, and next we see the ring converted into a star, where a central knot-point, the mind-monad receives information/energy from each corner of its bidimensional universe, ensuring a symmetric reception/mapping of its outer whole. And finally we see the 6 points connected internally and hence creating a new ∆-scale (that of the axons that come out of the neurons) and a new ‘mind-center’, in the central confluence of the points.

And again below we see the commonest divergences from the pure line: a sixth element also jetting out of the line (a tree), and a connected ‘bus’, equivalent to the connected circle, where the conniption is established by a single line, which becomes the ‘spine’ of the lineal, entropic, fast-moving system, far simpler than the fully connected hexagon, since *closed time systems are always more complex in information than faster, larger lineal spatial ones.*

**The generator equation of Space-Time beings.**

All this said we need to start formalising reality and all its systems. And we shall use for that task the same wording, GST, but now it means ‘Generator of Space-time’, an equation – the main equation of General Systems Theory (ab. GST) – that formalises the Universe as a fractal of space-time beings’, whose ‘Generator fractal equation of Space-Time defines logically what all systems are: polar systems of particles-heads of temporal information guiding body-waves of energy that move them over an underlying field-territory of vital space:

*∑∆-1: Spe <∆ST > Tiƒ ∆+1*

The metric equation of the 5th dimension thus ultimately describes a Universe made Energy Body-waves of Present splitting into past entropy fields/limbs and relative future informative particles.

We thus talk of **‘§pace’ **to signify the fractal structure and infinite ‘**s**pace**s**‘, where the plurality *§, organises also across ‘different planes of size, of parts and wholes of the 5th dimension’.*

*And talk also of STience, *as the proper upgrading of the name ‘science’, in as much as all what we study are ‘species of space-time’, that is species made of particles/heads which store logic, cyclical, temporal clocks of information that process it and guide its body-waves, systems that store spatial energy and move the whole system.

So all beings in ‘existence’, are ST, space-time beings of energy and information and we play with the word, ‘exi=stience’, which ultimately will become a mathematical function that studies such systems.

We shall return to that duality between the philosopher of science explaining the whys of the Universe and the physicist playing to be a philosopher of science, by reducing those whys to mere physical or mathematical interpretations of the whole, because it is at the core of the impasse that lasts more than a century in the understanding of the ultimate principles of reality.

And where to start if not in the concept of time≈motion≈change, which *physicists reduce to locomotions≈changes in space, but we do have to widen back again to all modes of time≈motion≈change to include those happening in biology and history (change in the information of beings).*

So what is reality about? OBVIOUSLY about the combination of entropic motions of pure space and closed temporal forms into energetic body-waves, which combine and iterate both.

All this said energy is often used as synonymous of motion, hence entropy; and sometimes as synonymous of information, fom-in-action, specially in relationship to physical stored energy and human mental energy. So we are not very fond of the rather confusing word and will have to be ambivalent also in its meaning. It is in that sense important to remark that:

- For a system to exist, it must be composed of a particle-wave, head-body, both co-existing simultaneously even if sometimes are not observable for a 3rd party, specially from far away, ∆o scales, etc. (quantum paradoxes). So the minimal unit of reality IS NOT as it would seem a past-future, space-time being, but rather a spacetime>time being, an ST>Tiƒ system in which a body-wave of energy (which if moving, will be sliding above a lower, ∆-1 field of entropy), is guided by a temporal head of information.

This is an important concept to realise. I.e when studying the gender issue we shall see that both male and female are composite states. When studying human social classes, we shall see that all humans should belong to the body of reproducer, workers, guided by informative masters, legal politicians and financial bankers, and so all deserve a minimum salary of energy-money, etc. The entropic field is the territorial field which sustains on the long term the activity of the body head or wave particle, but is NOT part of it, and in fact it becomes disordered or reordered when the ST>T system absorbs ∑∆-1 quanta.

- Systems however might be parts of larger systems and have a function that vitalises them (as machines, which are mostly limbs vitalised by human ‘animetals’, who act as their brains, are). This means there are partial systems, which Future researchers shall simply write as syStems (Spe parts), sysTems (Tiƒ part) or sySTems (ST-present body-wave).

- Hence the importance of composite elements and parameters, such as the composite of energy and time (action), which can be considered the minimal ‘organic system’ of the Universe. And as such it is the fundamental parameter of all systems, as it ultimately measures the ST>T existential power, product of its energy and time≈information, which is conserved on the total universe, but
*and this is a quite important advance over single space-time theories, not necessarily in a single scale.*

So we can now extend the generator to its natural ternary form, INCLUDING the concept of a central frame of reference, which is connected to the external membrane or sensorial ‘cut off’ ‘event horizon’ between the fractal space-time being and the Universe:

**$pe < Œ: ExI(s=t) > ºTiƒ**

This would be the most exact symbolic representation of the Universe.* AS we include the lineal nature of Entropic Space (not money:)in $, and ad the cyclical nature of time, with the symbol of the mind, whose hardware IS often on the Tiƒ (but not always), and spread the more complex body-waves which ‘equals’ both through balancing exchanes of energy and information to create the ‘whole supœrganism’ (œ).*

We use 3 ‘letters’ for each side of the Fractal Generator, to signify the 3 commonest perception of the 2 sides of the equation in human beings. Space appears as ‘Space-Size’, but also as ‘spatial entropy or kinetic energy’, that is an expansive motion (<), and as it has lesser form it comes ‘first’ in the evolution of beings as its relative past, young age of maximal motion in space. And inversely in the moment of death when the ‘cycle of time reverses locally its direction’. Locally being the key to avoid paradoxes.

We use also 3 ‘letters’ for Temporal, cyclical information, Tiƒ, T, Ti, for time, i, iƒ for information, and ƒ, for frequency of the external cycle, O, which is centred in a self-point of view or frame of reference @, and ƒt, for future, as those are the synchronic, dynamic and geometric interpretations of the other side of the equation.

And finally, its combination of iterative present, hyperbolic body-waves, Œ-ExI(st), whose function resumes the entire system: Max. S x T (e=i), and we shall call the function of existence of the system.

The Universe thus is relatively simple, in its dual and ternary logic, both in geometry, | x 0= ø, its meaning – a game of formal motions of space-synchornous organisation and time, 0-sum world cycles, and properties, geometric, organic, structural, mental, perceptive, as those systems do have a centre of angular momentum, a frame of reference that gauges information, a relative still point of view, and logic causal, since the purpose of those systems is as any fractal generator, to ‘repeat’ its form through slight variations caused by the dynamic duality of the 2 sides of the equation. How many varieties of the equation exist? Infinite. In physical systems the commonest are, expressions in terms of an energetic, spatial parameters and a cyclical curved clock of time (charge, mass, solid matter system in the 3 quantum, ∆-1, ∆-thermodynamic or ∆+1 gravitational scales).

*Perception thus in-form, creates information, as a fractal mirror of the mind:*

∞ infinitesimal cyclical quanta of energy and information x @ (human mirror mind) = Linguistic World

is the equation of the monad, or frame of references that freeze motion into order in the life arrow, Sp>Tƒ to then die away as a flow of informative future, Tiƒ<Spe, in the moment of death. The fractal generator is thus in its simplest development, the function of existence of the Universe.

**The separation between past, present and future is an illusion. The symmetry of time and space.**

Now we are confronted with a problem, which is the enormous ambivalence of human languages in the use of those 2 fundamental words, space and time, and its ternary formal motions, Sp, SxT: ST and Tƒ.

So we need to attach certain mathematical, geometric and logic concepts to our verbal terms to avoid so much ambivalence. Let us then return to Descartes and put some properties attached to those 3 symbols, which we advance ARE the ‘ultimate’ formal motions we care for, Sp, ST, Tƒ.

**Sp or Spatial Extension**, is ‘res extensa’, something extended in ‘space’. So it is a motion that expands in space, as in a big bang. And contrary to belief as it expands in space it decelerates in ‘time’ so it looses its ‘time motion’ till it becomes truly what ambivalent words tends to call Space- a still form. Thus space tends to slow down and extend itself; it does have motion but becomes finally a ‘flat’ extension.

**Tƒ****or Informative time cycles**, which carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and cyclical form of its cycles, is INVERSE in properties, as it actually accelerates inwards, as it becomes smaller, as all vortex do, V x Radius = Constant. Thus smaller radius, turn faster, as it happens with angular momentum, black holes or hurricanes. And they become ‘taller’.

So this shows some fundament facts of **Sp vs. Tƒ. **They are inverse. They are both FORMAL MOTIONS; but space has LESS of both; it is flat on the long term, and slow to stillness, and Time is faster and a cycle, which tends to be tall. So we can ask also define them by dimensions. Of the 4 dimensions used today, space tends to have 2 of them, length and width, and time, width and height. And so they combine in the ‘width’ dimension, which brings us the 3rd element:

**Sp x Tƒ: E x I: Reproductive, wave-bodies**that combine the entropy of space and the form of time clocks into ‘meaningful’, workable parameters, ‘energy’ (entropy with direction) and information (form with meaning).

So again, here we must focus in the ‘Duality’ between the Inverted ‘yin and yang’, ‘cyclical form and lineal entropy’, Sp and Tƒ, and its combinations that create the ternary ‘formal motions’ of reality, which will structure all beings.

And realize that we can see them ‘static’ and then we will call them SPACE, or we can see them in motion and we will call them TIME. This is the way to proceed with the ambivalences of words and as we shall see also ‘mathematical sciences’, which after all start with words.

The meaning of life and death is a world cycle of time, which is similar for each physical and biological species, and its equation, in the ¬Æ, non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean Logic of the Universe of cyclical time.

In the graph, we have summarized all those scales and the 2 relative inverse arrows, which make a life-death cycle a ‘loop’ of time in 3 ages moving also upwards and downwards in the 5th dimension, origin of the ‘Generator Equation’ of 5D Fractal space-time, poised to become the most important equation of science in the XXI century, as it resumes its 3 elements, the motions up and down in scales of the 5th dimension, the 3 ages of time, dominated each one by the 3 parts of all organisms, which respond to the 3 only topologies of geometrical systems’ – the young energetic age dominated by lineal toroid fields/limbs of entropy of maximal speed between 2 points, the mature, reproductive age dominated by present hyperbolic body-waves and the future-informative age dominated by spherical particle/heads of maximal informative storage:

**Γ.** ∆-1: Sp (past-lineal, toroid limbs-fields) ≤≥∆: ST (hyperbolic-planar body-waves) ≤≥ ∆+1 (spherical future particles-heads)

Whereas we introduce some basic symbols of 5D Metric, ∆ for the 5h dimension with an index for its planes, Γ, the G-enerator equation, which can be studied for each system in detail and for each part in new ternary fractal divisions, <, the arrow of expansive entropy, > the arrow of future information and ≈ =, the arrow of present balance, ST, the energy and information mixture of Sp: Spatial Extension and O-cyclical, temporal clocks with maximal form which body-waves mix in present states.

As both arrows can happen between entropic limbs-fields and waves, which move informative heads-particles and each part can be divided in new ternary parts (so for example your informative nervous system divides into a lineal spinal chord that controls the energetic body and limbs, your brain with a hyperbolic grey matter and your smaller eye, the focus of your information, making you an I=Eye (max. Information; Tƒ) < Wor(l)d=ST verbal brain:

i think therefore I exist: max. balance, the site of your will and finally the spinal reflex past system of control of your external motions – that obsessive part of a system of time space physicists study so well, but so simple when you know the whole depth of time space (-;

The old age is one of information. ≈ means a repetitive, parallel wave of present, and… uh, where it is < the arrow of entropy? It SEEMS that all goes > warping space into mass, or ≈ repeating itself. Alas! What else there is there in the Universe after conception, young expansive ages, repetitive, reproductive maturity and old, informative age, which erases < entropically information to close the ‘world cycle’ of existence.

Thus for each world cycle of existence, Death is the final reversal of the arrow of informative time from past to future into the arrow of disorder from future to past or entropy arrow, <.

And to compensate the two arrows Sp> Sp x Tƒ (ab.ST)>Tƒ, DEATH must be TWICE << entropy.

It must be Max. return to Sp, Tƒ <<Sp; a huge big bang expansion of information into Space with no form.

Death = Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ= Sp->∞ x Tƒ->0.

So when you die in an instant of Time, Tƒ->0 all your information returns to space, the cycle of existence ends and you expand in space, burn into atoms in the incinerator; insects eat you up, dust of space time you become.

It is also the equation of the big-bang, when in an infinitesimal moment of time, the previous Living Universe, expanded wildly under the inflaton field to enormous distances, in a single Planck quantum of death.

See the beats of existence, of the 3 arrows of time, of lives and deaths, of opening and closing wings, entropy-form…

The graph is a synopsis of the 3 fundamental elements that structure the Universe: the bidimensional topologies of spherical heads/particles, which assemble with planar toroid fields/limbs, forming together organic body/waves. And this simple structure is obeyed by all systems of the Universe. There is no particle without an associated wave (quantum complementarity), and there is no living organism without head. On the other hand, those systems extend across several planes of different size and time speed, synchronized by complex organic relationships.

Since clocks carry the information of the Universe in its form and frequency, we can then talk of two inverse arrows of time: information increases when we look downwards on those scales as in fractals, but size and speed grows when we go upwards. This ‘non-commutative’ asymmetric direction of spacetime is the key to most mysteries of the Universe. For example, since information flows freely from down to up scales, there are genetics (information flows from smaller systems) but there is no Lamarckian evolution, (the whole does not inform the parts).

On the other hand, since motion flows freely from up to down sizes, we can move the hand and everything smaller within it moves in perfect harmony, but the other way around there is a waste of motion called ‘entropy’ that does not flow upwards. The existence of such clear cut directions of time and the co-invariance in ‘families of systems’ of the product of its size and the speed of time clocks, (metabolic animals, particles, orbital planets, etc.), allow to create a ‘metrics’ of the 5th dimension; that is, a series of rules which dictate how systems ‘travel’, in ‘size’ and ‘speed’, as they grow and evolve, live and die through that 5th dimension.

Life for example is born as a fast seminal particle, with high metabolic rates, which emerges from the microscopic, cellular state, into a ‘Universal plane’ of larger size, at birth. Then the system goes through life, with changes in its relative energy and information and dies back to the lower ‘plane’ of cells.

Yet those phases of a life-death cycle are the same in any physical or biological system, since they follow the same simple metrics of the 5th dimension, and the laws of a ‘cycle of time’ that always ends in its point of initiation. For example a star is born out of a ‘seminal cloud’ of atoms that collapse its energy into the form of a vortex of matter, a galaxy that will feed a denser black hole and finally die into a quasar explosion that will return the energy to the universe. So energy never dies but transforms into form, into information back and forth in life-death cycle for all species. Moreover, all systems start with a lot of energy, which becomes form, information, from gas to solid state, from a young energetic age to an old, informative one. And this is a simple law of all time cycles that ‘curve space into time’ (Einstein).

Thus if you consider the past, the lower planes of the 5th dimension, the future, the wholes, the time ‘worldcycle’ of life and death, the creation and destruction of those wholes from parts (it is no longer a worldline as in physics but a worldcycle as we have added this 5th dimension from past to future), we do have a clear cut order, and organization of the Universe, through the new 5th dimension and the new worldcycles of life and death (no longer worldlines).

It is an enormous expansion of the principles of science, and a complete reorganization of all sciences and species, with new global laws, that deeply enlighten our comprehension of the ultimate phenomena of reality. Now it should be obvious to the reader that the 5th dimension is a dimension of time, of motion and as such it must be a dimension that moves from past to future or future to past.

**S=T ISOMORPHISMS: **

**¬ÆXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA**

The most important isomorphisms are those which explain how monad-minds interact through S≤≥T ‘stop and motion’ discontinuous steps with the Universe, in its plane and other scales through bidimensional flows of energy and information that become the actions that grow, reproduce and order each self-centred territorial organism of the Universe.

So we study the s=t symmetries of the monad with the Universe, which builds dynamically the being through its 3 steps: the mind-fractal point exchanges bidimensional flows of entropy, energy and information (Holographic principle, 2nd isomorphism), or ‘forces’ that give origin to existential a,e,i,o,u actions (in physical systems the mind will be a fermion, the flows of bidimensional exchange a boson, and the result an action between different ‘particles). Let us then fast review them.

** 2nd Isomorphism: **

**We are entities made of Motion and Form.**

**BIDIMENSIONALITY: 2-MANIFOLDS: FRACTAL POINTS, WORLDS AND ORGANISMS**

**HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE: SP>Tƒ SYSTEMS**

In the next graph we observe the fundamental elements, space-past-entropy and future-time-information cycles that combine into space-time beings. By the study of the symmetries in space time of a being, we mean to depart from the common properties of all space-time organisms, and the common narrative of its life and death cycle of existence, to analyse the being, *translating to the more unifying principles of General Systems, and 5D space-time, the properties of the being, thus reaching a sort of communion with the whole Universe, observing the being as a manifestation of those ultimate symmetries:*

In the graph, we observe some of those symmetries which ultimately reduce to the study of different parts and combinations of groups of generator equations:

Spe (past limbs/field of entropy) < S≈T (iterative body-wave) > Tƒ (head-particle of future)

So complementary fields-limbs joined to heads-particles connected through an iterative body-wave travel as a system or species through an external world in events which develop the world cycle of the super organism.

*On top, all 3D complementary systems are made by an assembly of the 3 only topological varieties of a 3 dimensional Universe, which correspond to the 3 organs and functions of all systems, according to the ‘vital’, moving nature of fractal, diffeomorphic dimensions:*

*– Toroid, limbs that process energy.*

*– Spherical, informative zero points and its external membranes that gauge information, and reduce it into a mapping of reality or mind in the zero point. Since the sphere is both the topology that stores more information and the only one that can shrink without teat to an infinitesimal mind-point. Hence we deduce the equation of the mind:*

*O-point brain x ∞ Universe = constant mind.*

*And hyperbolic bodies that combine and reproduce both, according to the mathematical laws of Non-Euclidean Geometry of those 3 forms=functions analyzed in the center. On the bottom we see samples of how the 3 forms assembly in different systems of the Universe.*

We defined bidimensional forms of energy and information, the line-plane/open string (math-physical jargon) and the cycle-closed string.

They can assembly 2-dimensional systems (quarks). Yet we live in a 3-dimensional Universe. Why? Since dimensional form is function, and systems are dynamic exchanges of energy and information, we need a 3rd dimension that combines and reproduce those complementary systems of energy and information.

The result is the Isomorphism of topological forms that defines a self-similar structure in all space-time systems of 3 dimensions, combining the inverse properties of lineal energy ‘limbs’ and, cyclical, informative Heads to a 3rd intermediate body geometry that allows a dynamic exchange between both poles: Sp< = >Tƒ.

There are only 3 topological forms in 2D space –* the space-time membrane of any single ∆-scale:*

Toroid, energetic topologies, informative spheres/planes and reproductive, hyperbolic-disks, used by the 2 other topologies to transfer energy and information.

*Thus in the holographic Universe 4D (3D with motions in the external ecosystem) are constructed by the intersection of 2 ‘holographic’ 2 D membranes, or by the accumulation in ‘sheets’ of 2-dimensional topologies.*

**Exchange of dimensions.**

Now what those systems do is to *exchange dimensions of spatial energy, temporal information, through bidimensional åctions, units of Space-time, that integrate as membranes into larger systems.*

*And so we must mix space dimensions, Sl,w,h and Time dimensions, Te,a,o, into Space-time åctions, ∂le, ∂la, ∂w,I, ∂wo, ∂hu, to see the development of reality.*

*The bidimensionality of those space-time åctions is thus the next element to understand existence.*

in the construction of fractal systems of the Universe.

We can see also *how both cyclical particles/heads and limbs/fields of ‘—motions’-motion-space come together to create some basic ‘constant’ systems of reality, a light wave whose c-speed is (Maxwell’s equations) constant and the product of an electric and magnetic (information/energy) parameter. So we can write μ (e) x ε (o) ≈ ST.*

The flexibility of the 3 elements involved in the creation of constant systems is thus important to fully grasp the ‘Game of creation’ of the Universe. Yet the game is not arbitrary, as entropic, expansive, ‘toroid’ limbs/fields, speed, space is |-Motion or ‘work’ that moves lineally a system, while cycles of time, clocks, forms, information is cyclical motion, or ‘information’ that reproduces cyclical forms.

And we will return to those concepts again, many times, as it is fundamental to fully grasp those basic ‘dualities’ of the 5th dimension and the way we perceive the Universe.

*Then 5D follows the same procedure, accumulating Universal sheets across several U±∆ scales, perceived together in the case of the Universal messing of ∆-1 quantum and ∆+1 gravitational sheets, as a curved ‘i-logic’ Geometry (Einstein’s four dimensions).*

All structures of the Universe are composed of only those 3 topologies:

- The energetic, toroid limbs: Max. Sp, ∑|
- Ø: Max. Re: The hyperbolic body with its regular cycles that transfer energy and information between…
- The external surface of the sphere and its center; which is the informative, cyclical region or zero point, the ‘pixel eyes’ that perceive in stillness a map of the Universe brought about by the flows of energy and information of the Torus.

**Holographic principle of creation. A universe made of quantum actions of energy & information.**

Let us start with the duality of space≈entropy and time≈in/form/ation, which define an important concept – that of the holographic principle that construct with both, planes (fields/limbs) of spatial entropy and cycles of in/form/ative time (heads/particles), reality and all its physical and biological systems.

The great revolutions of physics of the XX century were relativity and quantum physics, which can be resumed each one in a principle and a formula. The principle of relativity concerns the non-simultaneity of time as there are many cycles of time that define with different speeds different regions of the Universe. As each cycle closes into itself dividing the Universe in regions of different time-space speed.

From 2, yin-formation and yang-entropy comes 3, ‘body-waves of energy≈information, space≈time’, yin-yang says Taoism and it is right.

Once we have 2 elements the process of creation of new varieties by combination and reproduction is immediate, and so we can build a ternary, organic Universe. Since 2 always reproduces a third. It is the logic essence of the Universe so often lost to simplex physics, and its one-dimensional vision of time.

So we shall start a analysis of the whole range of forms in space and time that exist:

- Lineal Entropy and cyclical form combine into infinite reproductive waves of energy&information:

*In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.*

*Energy and space and time and information, are also closely related, as two sides of the same coin, such as space and information are the ‘fixed, still perception’, of moving, lineal energy and cyclical time clocks.*

ONCE we understood that time is cyclical and there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, for each entity in existence, with different time rhythms as Einstein explained, broken into infinite quanta, things are more clear.

Since we know that information is the perception of ‘still time’ of a cyclical clock, a form of information stored in the form and frequency of a time clock-cycle.

And we associate energy to lineal motion so to lineal time and its ‘still perception’ as a distance of space. *Since lineal motion and dimensional distance will be two ways of perceiving the same.*

So we must try to clarify a bit those ‘fundamental words’, energy information, entropy, time, space, etc, which are quite confusing and ambivalent in human sciences due to the lack of a ‘stientific’, unifying understanding of them.

To notice that only the bidimensionality of time cycles makes possible to merge or transform them into bidimensional space planes. As only beings with the same dimensionality can compare and mix. This forgotten rule of basic maths, explains why there is indeed space-time. If time had only a lineal dimension it could not merge with space. So what is the *dimension we must change? Height, the dimension of information and perception, so you are indeed looking at a piece of information, a screen of a computer with 2 dimensions, height and form.*

*We are all space-time beings, made of holographic meetings of bidimensional (tall/frequency) time cycles and moving, open spatial planes of entropy with lesser form (width-length). The second isomorphism of all systems study those symmetries and relationships between time cycles, its still-mind form (information) and entropy motions and its still perception (as distances of space). Its forms inverse and complementary, are related to its functions as the cycle stores max. information in minimal space, and the line, reaches max. distance with minimal form.*

The study of all the ‘isomorphisms’ (similar=iso forms and functions) across all the systems of the Universe is the purpose of an alternative philosophy of science to that of physicists, called ‘General Systems’, ‘cybernetics’ or ‘complexity’ , born after II world war, by the hand of the pioneers of Information Theory.

Since General Systems builds models of all sciences and the Universe at large, no longer as a simplex machine dominated by ‘energy’ ≈ ‘entropy’, existing in a single space-time continuum (Physicists’ world view), but as a fractal complex organism, dominated by information, which extends across ‘several layers’, which are ‘planes’ of space-time, both at Individual level (as the above image shows) but also at collective level – layers of increasing and decreasing size, which add surprisingly enough a 5th dimension:

How does the organic Universe structures itself? As an organism and that means it has parts that become wholes, cells that become organisms, atoms that become stars and galaxies. That is, several scales of space-time co-exist together. And so we need to define a new dimension that groups all those scales, the 5th dimension.

And what are those organisms made of? Of those planes of space-time. We are made of vital spaces that last a duration in time. This means the 4th paradigm of Stience will bring back the astounding insights on the structure of the Universe of Leibniz. A logic and mathematical model of relational time and fractal space.

This concept of philosophy of science, which we formalize in this site, was first enunciated by Leibniz, with his ideas opposed to those of Newton about a Universe in which beings were made of a fractal part of vital space and lasted a quantity of time cycles, as opposed to the ‘abstract’ artifact developed by Descartes – the Cartesian graph, in which beings were ‘put’ to measure its motion in space/time. The first mathematical physicists, notably Newton, made a ‘Kantian error’ of thought, confusing the artifact with reality. So they developed a similar ‘Cartesian Universal graph’, or background absolute, continuous Space with a single Time dimension of ‘lineal duration’, obtained by uncoiling all those infinite time cycles of which we were made (circadian biological cycles, mass and particle rotatory cycles, stars and planets orbital cycles, cyclical åctions of feeding, perceiving, reproducing which construct the beats of the Universe), and equalizing all of them with the cycle of the mechanical clock:

In the graph, mathematical physicists developed a Universal Cartesian graph to facilitate measure, and as times went by, they confused the artifact with reality, forgetting its abstract nature. So they equalized all time clocks with the mechanical time clock. And Kepler said: the Universe is a clock and god its clock maker who have waited 5000 (biblical) years to find and intelligence like his who understand his work.

The graph and Kepler’s concept shows truly the core problem of Physicists worldview: it makes them confuse their artifacts with reality. So if Kepler thought the Universe was a clock, now it is fashionable to think it is a computer. And if he considered that science consisted ‘only in making measures with clocks’, which extracts all the properties of it worth to know, now most of the scientific community just feeds data in computers and models reality with the mind of the computer.

Leibniz was much more profound. He realized we were made of spatial vital energy and temporal clocks that lasted our life-death cycle. As when we say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’. We are made of energy and time in perpetual cyclical motion and we do åctions of energy and time, which is truly the substance of the Universe.

But Newton with the help of the P.R.ess at a time when England started to build his empire with clocks and cannonballs and take over the world of the industry of information won the public battle and Leibniz who had also discovered calculus was accused of plagiarism and left behind in Brunswick to die alone, when his employer the Duke was chosen king of England, banned by Newton.

In this manner a false but ‘simpler’ easier to grasp and use for measure, the Cartesian Universal background continuous space-time was born. And the true essence of the Universe, to be a ‘game of vital spaces with quanta of energy’ that performed cyclical motions called time cycles, through the åctions of infinite beings was lost. Leibniz died poor, alone and forgotten except for his calculus 300 years ago.

Now run forward 200 years more. The abstract Cartesian Universal background and the mechanical single clock, whose ticks were elongated into space according to the formula, V=S/T was all that humans wanted to know about time cycles. And it worked to do measures of motion in space that lasted a time.

It didn’t work at all to understand the nature of the life-death cycle, the main time cycle of humans, neither of the longer time cycles of evolution that changed the internal form of the beings not only its external motion. But it worked very well to enthrone the mechanical clock, motion, weapons that moved and needed to be calculated in their speed and aim (Galileo was a maker of ballistic instruments, hence you learn the v=s/t formulae with cannonball trajectories).

But alas!, quantum physicists suddenly found that space was made of ‘quanta of energy’ in motion, they called H-constants. And those H-constants were ‘åctions of energy and time cycles’, measured with frequencies.

And they condensed, forming particles according to Heisenberg’s Principles. So we were all made of ‘plankton’ of light condensed into particles of cyclical time and energetic motions, electron nebulae in perpetual motion, masses rotating, quarks pulsating.

And then Einstein found that in different places of the Universe time clocks ran at different speeds, so there were infinite time clocks.

And so indeed we are made of vital spatial energy, Sp and clocks of time, which carried the form, the information of the universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. So we could write a generic equation for all beings: ∑Sp x Tƒ = ST (Constant being).

And yet because physicist as Feynman put it ‘never ask the why’ and they had been for 200 years using a single clock and a continuous space-time graph, they didn’t change its Newtonian model. Einstein said ‘Leibniz is right but if so we have to start the scaffolding of science from the beginning’.

So for 100 years more, we were left with a model, absolute space and time, which we all knew it was wrong, but it worked fine to do measures with clocks. Problem is it didn’t explain much of it, just measured the hows. And that is where we are still, because most physical ‘big science projects’ are today no more than industry of machine measures .

It was left a final property of space-time and all its beings made of space-time to account for, discovered with the other great ‘tool’ of scientific measure. Indeed, if we had changed our notion of time cycles, all pervading in all civilizations before Descartes and Newton for the abstraction, and substituted our verbal times, which humans used to measure and describe qualitatively time cycles of past, present and future and its ages and life-death cycles by mere clock measure, in our study of space, we had changed our spatial sensorial instrument, the eye, by the telescope and microscope, a machine.

This is the core matter: we substitute human time senses (verbal times) for a machine, the clock and that impoverished our understanding of the logic, causal cycles of time. And we changed a human spatial sense, the eye by microscopes and macroscopes – telescopes, but that opened our perception to an infinity of scales and planes of space-time where a myriad of other beings existed, and it did expanded our vision of space, into infinite ‘planes of existence’.

And yet because we were dragging the baggage of the Cartesian Universal graph in all our scientific thoughts, we didn’t realize we had to create a fractal, scalar concept of space-time, to account for the fact that in any single region of reality multiple ‘entities’ co-existed across multiple scales. And when we came closer to them, they enlarged and became full of information and life beings. This was the amazing sensation the first microscopes produced. But scientists didn’t formalize this reality of multiple ‘fractal’ scales of space-time, what I call ‘isomorphic planes’ since they and their beings display similar properties.

The isomorphisms of Nature are all of them derived of the ‘fractal, scalar’ nature of the Dimensions of Space and Time, and the fact that we are made of ‘space and time’, we are not placed in an abstract ‘background’ ‘Cartesian coordinates’, as in the paper the first physicists used to draw its equations. This is an artifact of measure nowhere to be seen in reality.

**Space and time, its inverted properties: Se =K/To**

Now this 3 elements, ‘space’ considered submissive to time and its cyclical actions; and the sequential order of change from smaller past parts to larger, social wholes, needs to be formalised, but as it happens, it IS already formalised by mathematics, which studies precisely in its 3 branches one of those elements:

Spatial geometry studies the forms of space in a fixed, still system of coordinates.

Now so far we have said that time is motion and space is form, stillness. But that is not enough to describe them. So far we have considered the fundamental principle of science – the constant switch on and off between motion and stopping. But this can be represented easily with a hyperbola:

The graph shows the 4 quadrants of the hyperbola, that define the 3 existential functions of Space-time, as seen from the point of view of the subjective o-mind in the centre of the frame of reference. Thus we can talk of ±∆S,T functions for each of the 4 quadrant and use the graph to represent the oscillations of the ages of existence.

Consider then the positive gradient, and we can have a simple equation of the time-space duality:

Φ. Time Motion= Constant/Space Stillness.

This inversion can be seen easily in the relationship between ‘lineal time motion’ and the ‘space’ and speed in space of the entity in motion. But it can be applied to many sciences – from the Laws of gases P(t)=C/V(s), also a hyperbola to the cycles of life and death. In that regard, there are in 3 curves to clear ‘sectors’, when we take Y as the coordinates of space, and X as the coordinates of time, making the ‘curve’ also an equation of ‘fractal speed’ which we latter explain what truly means:

- Max. Spatial energy and Minimal Information, on the right side – the energy segment.
- Max. Information x Min. Energy, on the left side – the information segment.
- Max. Exi (e=i) in the central point of balance of the hyperbola.
- Finally to notice that the perception of the hyperbola from inside, from the central point of view is as a cycle.

Now the fundamental law of the logic Universe is the inversion of space and time states, but perhaps more powerful is the concept of an eternal Universe, where time, motion never stops, it merely changes from arrow to arrow, from past to present to future as it continues its motion. Time never change, even if it brakes into infinite pieces and goes forwards and and backwards in each piece of space-time.

Relational space-time beings, fractal parts of the Universe, have two dual systems, one of entropy and one of information connected with a present-body/wave, which never stop the flows of time. Each part goes forward and bacwarkd in its life-death cycle and in each of its information energy, ±∆ absorption and emission, through its space-time action. And never cease to move.

ANGULAR CLOCKS AND LINEAL MOMENTUM IS ALWAYS CONSERVED, so are its integrations into kinetic, lineal energy and cyclic, positional, potential energy and the information it stores.

This, happens not only in physics, but in bio-chemistry, as Alan Mehaute proved in his fascinating ‘broken space-times’ with fractal geometry: once energy ceases (as in the life-death cycle), then information,wrinkles, curves the geometry of space-time in any scale of the reality. thus from Se>To, to To<Se, through Se=To, steady states, the reality of the 3 arrows of time, the Max. Se, Max. To, and Se=To, maximal, minimal and stationary point, proper of all hamiltonians and functions do happen and time merely switch back and forth or in parallel.

Thus we can reduce it all to a simple Logic statement:

** A**. Times never stop their repetitive ±∆e,i,u actions.

Thus this is the simplest image for a wave of time for an action of space-time for a beat of existence – so many things can be explained with it that metaphors would be infinite – as ALL laws of the Universe will be deduced from our simple definition of space and time, a go and beat motion stop gauge information move consume energy, absorb it (feed), stop, move absorb emit energy and information (reproduce)…

It is such a simple game that its first combinations do not fail to astonish us because we start to feel that after it logically, bio-logically it can expand into all:

- Max. Space x Min. Time, is the beginning of the hyperbola, which is our youth of maximal spatial energy and minimal cyclical information, but as we move through a point of balance when both, time and space are maximised (S=T) the adulthood, we go down into Max. Time x min. Space, at the end of the ladder. We keep falling since birth down the ladder of timespace. And that is the meaning of life, a walk through the 5th dimension from relative past to relative future of our region of space-time. And the formalism, I have called it Æ, existential algebra.

**The key dualities of cyclical, temporal information and Expansive, Planar, Space**

Now the key to understand the Universe is to understand the complex meanings and multiple possible perceptions of those 2 x 2 elements, its ternary combinations (as space-time), and its symmetries and antisymmetries (inversion of properties). So algebraically the representation of the Space-Time Universe is the hyperbolic function:

INDEED transcending the material reality of those 2 formal motions, the logic underlying truth of all this is the inversion of the two poles of the Universe:

*In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between Spatial expansion and Temporal Implosion in its infinite manifestations. *

*Its commonest mathematical function is the exponential, (1+1/n)™ whereas ‘1’ is the value of the whole system, n, the number of fractal ∆-1 cellular parts, and T, its temporal repetition, which defines all processes of growth and decay, in which in each time period the system grows or diminishes a space-quanta (hence its time derivative is always proportional). In that regard, one of the most fascinating elements of T.Œ is the enlightenment of the equations of mathematics, the MOST REALIST of all sciences, as it describes in its 3 disciplines, ‘fractal analysis’, Non-Euclidean Geometry, and ‘non-Aristotelian Algebra’ the common isomorphic laws of all species of the Universe. Time permitted by Summertime we will add a 4th post to this section, with the fundamental laws of ¬Æ, ‘i-logic’ mathematics’.*

In that regard, departing from the duality of Relativity (all dimensional forms are indistinguishable from relative motions), we have 4 possible ‘entities’ according to the duality of form and motion or the duality of Cycles Vs. lines:

- Tƒ: We shall call Cyclical motions, time clocks.
- Tiƒ: We shall call the cyclical form, in static states, information carried in its cycles and frequency.
- ƒt: We shall call future, the arrow of increasing information and frequency speed in time clocks.
- O: We shall use the O geometric symbol for all of them as the sphere carries the maximal information, it is a closed cycle or clock of time, and the future ‘warps’ lineal forms into cyclical, old, forms.

- Spe: We shall call Lineal motions, energies or entropies or lineal time duration.
- Sp: We shall call Lineal form, space dimensions.
- Ps: We shall call Local past, the state or arrow of increasing maximal entropy.
- |: We shall use the symbol of the line for all of them, as the line is the shortest distance between 2 points.

And then, we call their points of maximal combination, often the 1 point of the curve, of maximal balance: Max. E x I, S≈T:

- Ø-S≈T(exi), present body-waves of maximal balance, which the system preserves and iterates. As only present ‘exi≈st’

Thus the Universe constantly combines the duality of lineal and cyclical forms, into its present Ø-wavebody combinations.

And so the Universe conservers both cyclical and lineal motions & still forms, resumed in the conservation of present energy & information (in classic physics):

- Cyclical and lineal motions, that is, angular and lineal momentum, become then the main motions of time, which combine in∞ Ø-waves.
- Cyclical information and lineal dimensions, that is spatial forms, which also combine to create complex organic systems with heads/particles of cyclical form that store information and lineal limbs/distances that process energy with its still forms.

Science is full of variations on those different symmetries and studies, and the interchangeability of both ways of observing the Universe to get the same results.

To stress though, that of all those terms, the most ambiguous is the physical concept of energy, which here we use sometimes as a synonymous of entropy or lineal motion (kinetic energy) in the common sense expression (I don’t have energy, you have too much energy), expressed as the capacity to move, and opposed to information, also a wider term than the restricted concept of Shannon in physics, more akin to the common use of information as forms that can be perceived. Hence related to form. As a cycle do have more form than a line.

Reality thus is a game of two elements, spatial energy and temporal information and its combinations and transformation, symmetries and species made with them.

We thus fast forward to the expression of the Generator, feedback equation of the Universe of space-time beings, which Galileo and Newton missed (but Leibniz, the ignored Genius understood with his concept of fractal space and relational time):

|-Sp (Spatial Extension: fields/limbs) It (heads-particles of temporal information).

If we see those 2 motions as forms, we talk of lineal space and forms of information. If we see them moving we talk of kinetic energy and cyclical clocks of time.

If we see them sequentially, we talk of flows of time. If we see them co-existing in simultaneity, we talk of a simultaneous organism of:

Sp-limbs-fields<ST-Bodies-waves

Since we ARE made of time cycles and lineal motions of space, perceived either as It: information, or Sp: space, in stillness, or Se: kinetic, lineal energy and Tiƒ, cyclical time clocks when in motion.

This is the next huge advance of T.Œ, to know what we are made of: Es, energy and Tƒ, cyclical time, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy any time to do this’, perceived in stillness as Sp-bidimensional planes of space and tall, bidimensional planes of information, It; where bi-dimensionality means a ‘thin sheet’ as the thin screen of information which you are reading this blog.

Physicists call this fact the holographic principle of Information. They wonder why black holes seem to store all the information its bidimensional surface. They wonder how space and time can mess in space-time relativity IF only entities with the same number of dimensions can mess.

Now the principle is explained for spatial bidimensional sheets of ‘entropic, expansive, kinetic energy motions’, cyclical, tall, temporal bits of information, and its hyperbolic combinations of present-spacetimes, which put together create all the systems of the Universe..

** MOTIONS IN TIME AND ITS SYMMETRIES WITH FORMS IN SPACE.**

But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion? The answer is that all has form and motion *at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.*

*And this is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never quite fully grasped it.*

**The Galilean Paradox. The principle of absolute relativity: minds cannot perceive together motion and form.**

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

**Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles **

*And so we need to differentiate between ‘lineal motions or lineal momentums’ (|-Sp) and its still continuous perception by the mind, or space (|-Sp), and cyclical motions, clocks of time, (O-Tƒ) and its still perception by the mind or information (It)’. *

*Since they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call them Spatial Extensions-Entropy-Energy and Temporal Form-Information, fully aware that humans used multiple different jargons and concepts to express the same, Es and It.*

So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?

*This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those a ‘priori states’. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. *But as we are in a world of physical concepts, after much ambivalence in the terminology – not in the concepts and mathematical analysis of them – I came to settle in the classic terminology of philosophy based in the relative function of those 2 elements in the systems of the Universe and call generically:

– All states of relative motion ‘time states’ or ‘time ages’. And its study diachronic studies.

– All states of relative form ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study synchronic studies.

And yet keep the formal duality naming O-Time clocks, Time, but also |-Space motions, entropic spatial motions.

Why? Because in *relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:*

*– Tƒo: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motions-states-forms. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.*

*– Spe: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.*

* – STœ: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.*

So let us introduce you to the much vaster wealth of knowledge provided by the proper understanding of ‘vortices’ of cyclical time and its interaction with res extensa, lineal space:

*In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.*

Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles. How many more dimensions?

Time cycles have actually 3 dimensions, or motions (depending on how you see the cycle, still or in motion), which we have always known.

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sp is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and Tƒ is a cycle of tall time.

*Sp (length, width) ≈ Tƒ(height, frequency)*

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

*Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allow the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional. And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroid-limbs fields, hyperbolic waves-bodies and spherical heads-particles) and its 3 time motions-ages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3 ^{rd} ages). *

*And then every 3 space-time symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5 ^{th} dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scales also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scale with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity. *

So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, -, – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, -, -, -, -, ….. , -. Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.

Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal space-like. We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.

Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time:

*Past-Sp>Future-Tƒ: field>particles.*

Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wave-bodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4^{th} dimension of motion:

∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers -> 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) -> 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form)/

Space as expansive, decelerating entropic field-motion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.

WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.

But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Sp-fields/limbs <ST-body waves>Tƒ-Heads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.

Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensions-motions of time: past, present and future.

What is the difference between them? We shall soon get to it. But first we must resolve the implications of a time described as a cycle. First the obvious: if time is a cycle, there are infinite times, and what physicists call lineal time, absolute time, is as Leibniz, the philosopher said to Newton – well not to Newton, who would not receive him, but to Clarke, a ‘friend of a friend’ – is just the pegging together of all those finite time cycles. Next, if time is a cycle – and here is where the insights of Einstein have its value – we can SEE time, as long as the cycle is fast enough to close in less time that the eye takes into seeing. So all ‘time cycles’ that close in less than the second the eye takes into make a ‘still picture’ of the Universe.

And this brings us the solution to the second Principle of Physics: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. The relativity of all motions, which can not be distinguished from stillness, *when the cyclical motion is fast enough to seem a solid form in the case of closed time cycles, or when we are moving along the frame of reference of the other motion with the same ‘spatial lineal speed’.*

So in the same manner that Mr. Einstein built his Relativity on the aforementioned principle, (only referred to lineal space, as he never understood cyclical time), we shall build a much more rich meaning for the Universe, on the aforementioned principle, based in the duality of cyclical time forms of information or time clocks in motion and lineal space forms or distances and line motions.

The reproduction of Motion dominates the perception of form. A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

Now, it is important to understand that the Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind things otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox. The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

A simple proof of the holographic theorem: Fermat’s last theorem.

Now information is bidimensional as this computer ou are observing or any page of any book. Further on mathematics is the most realist of languages, since if we are made of time and space, logic algebra and spatial geometry and analysis (5 Dimensional integration of parts into wholes) are both the 3 main branches of mathematics and the 3 components of the 5 Dimensional Universe of space-time beings.

So a simple proof of the holographic principle comes from the fact that as Godel proved and Lobachevski said, mathematics is a realist science, which needs to be proved by the existence in the Universe of its theorems.

Mr. Fermat, my countryman, basque, amateur scientist (-; couldnt fit in the margin, a proof of his Ultimate theorem which states that no natural numbers x, y, and z exist such that x³ + y ³ = z³ (i.e., the sum of two cubes is not a cube). But we shall fit it (-:

This is the simplest proof of the bidimensional nature of time and space, as mathematics is the most realist of all languages, defining as Lobachevski thought despite the idealist Hilbert-Copenhagen school, the nature of reality through the proper understanding of its logic laws.

Numbers are social groups of equal entities and they organise by superposition into bidimensional planes, which are added to form the 3rd dimension, or multiplied perpendicularly to form space-time beings. So there are only single numbers, bidimensional complex numbers (where the imaginary axis is the axis of time, for reasons beyond the scope of this limited analysis of black holes) and quaternions for space-time complex beings, but NOT ternary numbers, NOT x³ + y ³ = z³ . You see, it fit in a margin (-; The proof found 400 years latter though required thousands of pages of computer thought, and this is the difference between good simple science and complicated work. The Universe is simple and not malicious. And mathematics is as lobachevski explained, an experimental science which needs as Godel proved, experimental proofs as the reflection of the structure of space and time. Space and time are bidimensional so we have only 1, 2, 4 dimensional numbers. Nobody has succeeded creating 3 dimensional scalars, or found a way in which to superpose cubes. So growth in the Universe happens as the sum or multiplication of bidimensional cycles of temporal information and bidimensional planes of space.

Thus as always the simplest proofs of the properties of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, will be logic and mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. The fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X^{3}+Y^{3}≠ Z^{3}. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) al*beit without commutative properties. *An interesting property for more advanced courses on i-logic mathematics. So systems are constructed through bidimensional parts, which have space and time functions:

It shows the meaning of a generic quanta of space, a flat plane with lineal momentum or kinetic energy which is the lineal motion of a plane of space.

**The symbolism for the holographic Universe of bidimensional Space & Time.**

**Sp, (|-Spe)** will be a parameter of Size or lineal, planar space when perceived in stillness, or entropy (also denoted in mathematical physics by the symbol **S**) defined as an expansive, decelerating motion, when perceived dynamically – which increases the ‘space’ or res extensa of the system, decelerating to a halt.

In geometry space is a Space Plane, a bidimensional geometry, such as h (bivector of angular momentum) or c².

In its complete description sometimes we should write |-Spe, for Lineal motion-form, Space Plane, Past, Entropy and Energy arrows, when *considering the 5 fundamental perspectives, or isomorphic laws encoded on the bidimensional space elements of the Universe:*

*To be lineal, toroid in mental, geometrical form (|); to be ‘Space, res extensa’; to be a ‘bidimensional flat plane’, to be the Past, dead arrow, hence to be entropic disordered motions in terms of functions and motions through the 5 ^{th} dimension, and to be ‘kinetic energy’ in the Present ST-plane. *

– **Tƒ **will be a parameter of cyclical time, which increases its cyclical speed as it becomes smaller. The full name would be ‘Tiƒo’, from those 5 perspectives, as Time cycles are ‘Ti-me’, ‘i-n-fo-rmation’ from the perspective of its fixed form and transference through the 5^{th} dimension; ƒuture, old age, from the perspective of the worldcycle view – as the last age before entropic death, and o in its cyclical clock-like vortex form.

In geometry is a cyclical imaginary number that grows in the height dimension, ‘sucking in’ and therefore shortening by an inverse i=-x², quantity.

And we know there exists as social numbers (point planes and networks of the 5th dimension) do have this form. So imaginary numbers so called complex numbers have an i-sucking, negative diminishing X-dimension, of height that forms the temporal cycles, which are for that reason better expressed in exponential numbers, E Θi, whereas the number is elevated to the angular i conjugate.

So the reader must see sometimes, specially in non-corrected old graphs, any of those combinations – the most likely an E for Entropy/kinetic energy for Space and an I, for informative Time. And its combinations ExI, as symbol of present:

**– ST,** will therefore be preSenT. We shall write it also as, **ExI,** since the present is dynamic and outside fundamental physics and Geometry in biological and social sciences, people use the concept Energy and Information most often with a wider, loose meaning similar to the two fundamental elements of reality.Then we can write:

ExI(st) as the function of existence in present time, which IS THE QUANTITY the Universe conserves, ‘Present’. Or:

STœ; in which the 3 elements of all beings, its spatial territories (the closest of which are its limbs and bodies), its temporal functions and cycles, and its point of view are present. Systems do become extremely complex in their symmetries and relationships to a point it makes difficult to realise what is the whole, and its parts, and what are its forms and functions, but ultimately through the understanding of the ‘isomorphic laws’ of all of them, based in the ternary properties of reality, they can be analysed in full.

**The key dualities of cyclical, temporal information and Expansive, Planar, Space**

Now the key to understand the Universe is to understand the complex meanings and multiple possible perceptions of those 2 x 2 elements, its ternary combinations (as space-time), and its symmetries and antisymmetries (inversion of properties). So algebraically the representation of the Space-Time Universe is the hyperbolic function:

INDEED transcending the material reality of those 2 formal motions, the logic underlying truth of all this is the inversion of the two poles of the Universe:

*In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between Spatial expansion and Temporal Implosion in its infinite manifestations (in physics those laws are always of the type: Energetic information (ST) = Space quanta (H, k) x Time frequency (v, T).** So we can easily derive the fundamental laws of quantum and thermodynamics and the meaning of its constants, with the left side equation (which the nuclear physicist will immediately identify with the decay rate of an atom, and the ‘entropic believer’ with the Pv=nKT law of gases). *

*Its commonest mathematical function is the exponential, (1+1/n)™ whereas ‘1’ is the value of the whole system, n, the number of fractal ∆-1 cellular parts, and T, its temporal repetition, which defines all processes of growth and decay, in which in each time period the system grows or diminishes a space-quanta (hence its time derivative is always proportional). In that regard, one of the most fascinating elements of T.Œ is the enlightenment of the equations of mathematics, the MOST REALIST of all sciences, as it describes in its 3 disciplines, ‘fractal analysis’, Non-Euclidean Geometry, and ‘non-Aristotelian Algebra’ the common isomorphic laws of all species of the Universe. Time permitted by Summertime we will add a 4th post to this section, with the fundamental laws of ¬Æ, ‘i-logic’ mathematics’.*

In that regard, departing from the duality of Relativity (all dimensional forms are indistinguishable from relative motions), we have 4 possible ‘entities’ according to the duality of form and motion or the duality of Cycles Vs. lines:

- We shall call Cyclical motion, time clocks, which carry information in its cycles and frequency. So there is also:
- We shall call Cyclical form, information.

And then:

- We shall call Lineal motions, energies or entropies or lineal time duration.
- We shall call Lineal form, space dimensions.

This order has given primacy to the duality of lineal and cyclical forms, and its Ø-wave like combinations.

And so the Universe conservers both cyclical and lineal motions & still forms:

- Cyclical and lineal motions, that is, angular and lineal momentum, become then the main motions of time, which combine in∞ Ø-waves.
- Cyclical information and lineal dimensions, that is spatial forms, which also combine to create complex organic systems with heads/particles of cyclical form that store information and lineal limbs/distances that process energy with its still forms.

Science is full of variations on those different symmetries and studies, and the interchangeability of both ways of observing the Universe to get the same results.

To stress though, that of all those terms, the most ambiguous is the physical concept of energy, which here we use sometimes as a synonymous of entropy or lineal motion (kinetic energy) in the common sense expression (I don’t have energy, you have too much energy), expressed as the capacity to move, and opposed to information, also a wider term than the restricted concept of Shannon in physics, more akin to the common use of information as forms that can be perceived. Hence related to form. As a cycle do have more form than a line.

Reality thus is a game of two elements, spatial energy and temporal information and its combinations and transformation, symmetries and species made with them.

We thus fast forward to the expression of the Generator, feedback equation of the Universe of space-time beings, which Galileo and Newton missed (but Leibniz, the ignored Genius understood with his concept of fractal space and relational time):

|-Sp (Spatial Extension: fields/limbs) <ST (iterative waves-bodies)>It (heads-particles of temporal information).

If we see those 2 motions as forms, we talk of lineal space and forms of information. If we see them moving we talk of kinetic energy and cyclical clocks of time.

If we see them sequentially, we talk of flows of time. If we see them co-existing in simultaneity, we talk of a simultaneous organism of:

Sp-limbs-fields<ST-Bodies-waves<Tƒ-Particles heads.

Since we ARE made of time cycles and lineal motions of space, perceived either as It: information, or Sp: space, in stillness, or Es: kinetic, lineal energy and Tƒ, cyclical time clocks when in motion.

This is the next huge advance of T.Œ, to know what we are made of: Es, energy and Tƒ, cyclical time, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy any time to do this’, perceived in stillness as Sp-bidimensional planes of space and tall, bidimensional planes of information, It; where bi-dimensionality means a ‘thin sheet’ as the thin screen of information which you are reading this blog.

Physicists call this fact the holographic principle of Information. They wonder why black holes seem to store all the information its bidimensional surface. They wonder how space and time can mess in space-time relativity IF only entities with the same number of dimensions can mess.

So we shall soon consider those concepts in physics. But before we do so we need to introduce the third element that structures the Universe and orders all those time cycles and vital spaces – the 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes in space and speeds of time clocks.

## Kønstants: s/t, t/s, sxt

ASSOCIATED to those exchanges of entropy, energy and information there are ‘constants’ that establish the main s≤≥t exchanges possible according to a series of ratios that define how the singularity>organism interacts with its world, of which 3, speed, density and existential force are the most important (s/t, t/s, s xt), as they define the entropic, reproductive, informative and social power of the system.

So the quantitative analysis of bidimensioanl flows and actions go through the use of vital and universal constants in equations of ¬Ælgebra (existential algebra).

**The 3 motions=ages of time and its parallel forms of space.**

This always surprised me. How people could believe in a single infinite time duration if their ‘time cycles of life and death were all similar to those of all other beings and all were finite?’

Let us give you a first hint to what might be considered the most important sequential beat of time – the finite life death cycle of beings:

All systems are born as seminal seeds, including physical systems (crystals, black holes), growing, going through 3 ages and then dying away back to simpler forms. So they had to be made of finite time cycles which somewhat warped, wrinkled their vital spaces.

But T.œ requires topping the cake, with an eternal equation – why we exist? The answer is organic and obvious: to survive. As if we didn’t we would not exist. And then all comes to the question, how we survive? And this is an organic, biological question: providing energy and information to our ternary systems, and further on, evolving into larger, more powerful wholes, through the 5^{th} dimension. And this simple truth is the program of the Universe.

It is interesting to remember the founding fathers of science, which ARE NOT the Mechanists of the XVII century but the Greeks who understood it all:

– Democritus said the Universe was made of atoms, and atoms had 2 qualities ‘MOTION AND FORM’. Yes, he didn’t see them so he went straight to the philosophical essence. This, Plato understood. And he divided motion into ‘biological motion or internal change’ and physical motion or external locomotion. He understood.

– Aristotle, the highest mind of the western decoupling, only comparable to Leibniz, went into detail and classified motions into 6 types, and it is worth to mention:

– Motions in lineal space, or locomotions, the only one physicists study.

– Motions in a time cycle, divided into ‘conception and birth’, change of state (internal form or quality motion) and extinction, dissolution.

– Motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which he divided into growth and diminution or ‘motions of quantity’.

He understood without the need of telescopes and microscopes the essence of the Universe.

Yet if we consider a simple graph of those ages in terms of yin-information (broken, warped forms) and energy, yang (continuous lines), we will easily realize that the same knowledge was already in the Chinese-Korean traditional culture.

In the first and second line we study the previous graph, in detail.

The main space superorganisms, and its world cycles of time life-death sequences, as they are made of points that evolve into social networks which perform with those networks ∆-1 finitesimal actions of space-time to keep on living but finally wear down and die, because of the 3 ‘sequential orders’ of time arrows and state forms, space and time arrows are inverse, but 5D is a time arrow, it increases the overall information of the system warping it into super organism:

Sp≤ST≤Tƒ (space symmetry)

Ps≥Ts≥ƒt (time symmetry)

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (entropy asymmetry)

Thus the sum of the 3 symmetries S+T+∆ gives, the implosive informative arrow > dominant towards the future, till all is warped and only entropic fast death<< can restore the Universal balance, liberating information, as the system descends back two scales from a point of a world society to a cellular disaggregated mass.

Thus there is in space a balanced flow towards present-past (dominance of entropic motions and reproductive bodies), unbalanced by the fact that in time there is a dominant arrow of information throughout the life cycle (aging process) and in 5D there is also an arrow of information from parts to wholes that tight the system and warp it as the 3 scales co-exist together but the larger whole actually dominates the system and receives information with no entropy from lower scales.

So overall information dominates any life cycle, till it is exhausted and death dissolves it, in as much as the 5th dimension of parts that become wholes is biased by the different entropies (energy flows worst upwards than downwards).

Now when we say we use all the linguistic perspectives we mean each property has a different point of view:

From the point of view of eusocial evolution and shynchronicity the 5th dimension is pure poetry of love

From the mental Tƒ, point of view, it is a linguistic survival game of calculus of probabilities, selfishness and greed as it uses smaller beings as bites and bits of energy an information.

From the perspective of the entire range of 5D scales it is a game of justice as we give it all for our social scales and ab=use our internal parts and the world we use to absorb energy and information.

From the perspective of the being as a whole it is all an organic game of survival through its actions

From its spatial objective analysis is a game of ratios, proportions, constants and mathematical topologies.

From the perspective of sequential time world cycles is a game of Nirvana, of non-freedom and determinism, of no egos, as all is repeated and all dies away.

**Beings as Knots of cyclical space-time actions: ****Simple physical constants.**

Let us then consider the simplest Universal constant:

| < π > O

In this simple ratio 3 forms of space, 3 lines curve to create a cycle of time, by virtue of a curvature function, π, which therefore is the Universal constant most often repeated in all |πO: > transformations of entropy into information, which are an enormous array of physical equations.

A polynomial on base 10 on the other hand will be a sign most often of an ∆-motions, in equations of resonance, herding, reproduction and social evolution.

THUS, we can obtain from those regular exchanges, motions, rations and transformations of | , Ø, O, >≈ < functions/flows o space and time.

**LIVING UNIVERSE. PHYSICAL CONSTANTS.**

Can we treat other universal constants as pi functions that transform back and forth entropy into information?

Yes, if we consider the same algorithm for the main scales of physical systems such as:

|-E < h-planck > O-ƒrequency for the quantum scale

|-E < k-boltzmann <> O-Temperature for the thermodynamic scale

|-E<c2>O-Mass for the gravitational scale.

So what we observe on those physical scales is the transformation of an entropy-energy arrow into one of time-frequency/information through a constant of action/entropy/speed square which is the transformative < π> factor back and forth, and as such an Ø-present constant of action combination of the other 2.

So, Universal constants are ratios of those transformations, which become all pervading for those who relate the largest possible physical space-time scales (the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales):

In the graph on the left side we can see the different Universal constants as metric and ratios of exchange of energy and information between the 3 main scales of human actions, the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales.

In the graph the equations of the 3 physical scales and its ‘constants of space’:

Est = ∆-2 (quantum scale): Hs x ƒt = Ks x Tt (∆-1: thermodynamic scale)= 1/2 Ms x vt : ∆+i (Gravitational scales)

So the quanta of space, h, k, m, varies as we change planes of existence, since the transition between points into superoranisms ‘fogs’ the vision of information along more than one scale. Closer and hence more accurately observed there is the thermodynamic scale with k, the unit of entropy as the quanta of space and temperature, the vibration of motion of molecules, or its ‘cyclical thermodynamic clocks’ as the unit of motion in time, and its product energy. Finally in the gravitational scale, the quanta of space is ‘mass’ (which of course must be combined with the dilatation of ‘temperature’, and the underlying ‘extension’ of space-time ‘h-light quanta’). All in all mass (not necessarily matter) and more often ‘momentum’, which ads to mass speed, might be consider the quanta of space, which the different motions of those masses, of which angular and lineal speed are the commonest ones, give us even closer analysis of some of the features of physical systems of space-time.

It is quite interesting to make some deep philosophical thoughts about the last paragraph – the fact that mass and speed *change their functions when we move from ∆+3, galactic space to ∆+4, cosmological space. So mass which is fixed in value at ∆+3, becomes close to c-speed, in the fringe of the galactic organism (at its membrane and nuclei).*

Now, again we must refer to the general structure of fractal space-time points, when fully constructed as functional ternary super organisms. It will then have a simple ternary structure with its membrane fine-tuned and synchronized sensorially to its singularity. Yet for the enclosed territorial vital space, or body-wave system, those 2 ‘invisible’ unreachable limits of maximal information (singularity) and maximal energy (enclosure), determines the limits of ‘energetic speed’ and ‘density of information’ of the system, *which as long as it is within the membrane and singularity cannot colder/superfluid in its informative density-mass, than the center, and have a harder, faster, simultaneous, longer constant of space than the surrounding membrane.*

This means as each scale will find a perfect ‘frozen’, efficient particle-head, and body-wave to ensemble a dominant super organism in practical terms that each scale will be populated from the perspective of its minimal space-quanta *by what was the maximal space quanta of its ∆-1 scale, which then becomes in the upper scale the entropic unit.*

Yet as the ∆-1 scale maximal space quanta, by the law of balance, S=T, will be also the max. S xT, as it turns out it is the top predator element on the lower scale which sets the constant parameters of the upper scale. And so the function of this ‘being’ changes from ∆-1, Top Predator vital being, to ∆-space, entropic cell of the larger whole.

And this brings a long way our understanding of the 3 previous constants h, k, m and how as we focus in larger scales, their role transmutes from active to passive System.

We indicate such fluxes we use a simply intuitive term, S>T, which shows how a larger spatial form becomes a smaller, more informative systems.

Now consider its inverse symbol, T<S, which shows how information dissolves into entropy as in the case of human biological deaths, when our information is erased and our body expands back into cells gaining space.

Does this inverse ‘arrow of time’, of pure entropy holds also for physical systems? Of course it does. In fact it is embedded in the most important equation of physics: E<=>M(t) c², which as it happens can go one way or another. And so when Mass explodes into pure entropy-radiation, we are ultimately also observing a specific case of 5D metric.

Those Universal constants and by rule all the Universal constants of systems, tend to be formal ratios of transformation along one of the permitted flows of energy and information of the Universe, between scales or social groups; horizons of evolution and any other fixed ‘allied Ælgebraic condition of a system:

In the graphs we can see how a Universal constant is viewed as a ‘limit’ by science, beyond which the system enters a higher or lower scale of the 5th dimension suffering ‘asymptotic transformations’, sudden accelerations or decelerations, growth or reductions of its time and space parameters (in physical space, lorentz transformations, changes of energy regimes in fluids and cut-offs in radiation are examples of those cases in the gravitational, ∆+1; thermodynamic, ∆ and quantum, ∆-1 scales.

But the proper way to understand Universal constants are as places of S=t BALANCE, which maximise the ‘Max. e x i’, knots of systems and its body-waves. So Universal constants are points of absolute balance whose s=t symmetry becomes ‘broken’ by a moving wave or particle that uses the energy-form fields of the constant to extract its own subject motion; often by association with a similar e x i entity, which will ‘encircle’ the energy and information o the lower ∆-1 ‘constant space-time’ to extract motion and form/curvature from it.

In the graph in any exchange of energy and information between two polar particles of time, through a wave that mixes both, there are certain relationships that establish stable, topologically correct changes of curvature and motion, ruled by ‘vital constants’ that measure the fixed content of energy and information, motion and curvature transferred in each exchange.

The Universe on the other hand, though it is constantly in motion, has numerical patterns and regularities, which are deterministic values for the energy, information, entropy and curvature=form=time speed of its different species.

Those are the quantitative values of science, where a number is a social gathering of indistinguishable forms, which are all herds of clonic beings, put together in social scales – mostly of decametric or ternary nature, hence the abundance of π and 10 logarithmic scales.

**Rules of conservation and loss of energy and information… across scales.**

Before we go further we must do a simple statement regarding the immortality of the Universe departing from the concepts of energy and work:

“The virtual volume of Energy and Information, space and time of the Universe is infinite and equal: S= T; S+T= e x i ”

The simple sentence encodes all the mathematical relationships of the function of existence and its constants of form.

ENERGY. As we have said Energy is a present, Max. e x i function, where entropy understood as motion is dominant but there is form, hence there is in-form-ation in the motion. So its equations can be resumed in terms of lineal, expansive motions with a minimal form.

WORK therefore, which is essentially the measure of ‘active energy’; that is, ‘energy in time’, does not exist if there is not an open displacement, a lineal motion. Time does NOT work, meaning time cycles are closed cycles which do NOT spend work-energy; and this amazingly important fact, hardly understood philosophically by the wannabe gurus of the absolute means ultimately that time is eternal, and so it is the Universe, which has no manifest destiny, no lineal goal. Lineal time indeed would exhaust itself as it would spend the energy of the Universe.

*So only a Universe of eternal world cycles, which cancel the ‘expenditure of energy’ when the cycle is closed is really possible. *

Alas all this is good but the question never fully understood and explored is *how does the principle of conservation of entropy, form and its body-waves of energy and information, applies between scales? Are those quantities conserved, and how they ‘transfer’ when we emerge in larger or descend in lower scales? *

So it describes the ternary symmetries of the ∞ systems we observe in the Universe, *which always have those 3 parameters:*

In the graph, the basic metric of 5D physics, and its main scales… further elaborated on our articles on physical systems on the 3rd line. So in physical scales, we see that energy is conserved, and it is the product of spatial constants and time frequencies. So if we reduce ourselves to the 3 main scales of physical systems:

Quantum scale: ∆-1: Energy = h (space constant) x ƒ (time frequency) =

Thermodynamic scale: ∆: Energy = nk (space-constant) x Temperature (time frequency) =

Gravitational scale: ∆+1: Energy = cc (space-constant) x mass (time frequency: E=hƒ=mc², m=(h/c²) x ƒ

Those 3 previous equations and its full understanding in terms of fractal §pace and cyclical πime are indeed the key to understand how the Universe constantly moves and creates departing from those 3 elements its physical systems.

Indeed, amazing as it seems, we do have perhaps the clearest physical proof of the existence of the 5th dimension in the existence of those 3 equations which shows how indeed all scales do follow the metric, and when we translate the clocks of time and quanta of space of each scale, Energy remains the same, *THUS THE METRIC CO-INVARIANCE STAYS. *

How we do know frequency, temperature and mass are the mass clocks of those 3 scales? It is rather obvious. Frequency is the unit of time. Even physicists without understanding cyclical time-clocks, measure with the frequency of the light the ‘temperature’ of cosmic systems (hence the billions of degrees they talk about – meaning huge frequency); and mass is by the principle of equivalence of Einstein an accelerated vortex of time; which in the previous equation of energy we easily translate into the frequency of radiation, M = K x ƒ, in which it can be transformed in a big-bang.

In other lines when we use the concept of a cyclical accelerated clock of time to unify masses and charges, we will realise that the more correct approach is to consider the electron, not the lineal light frequency, the clock of time of the electromagnetic world, *a* scale above that of *light. *And we will deal with the fascinating in-between transition regions, when as a system transcends to a higher scale, which uses the smaller beings as its relative ‘entropy of motion’, to evolve its systems, the living, moving dynamic time-space quanta of the lower scale emerge as fixed space constants to support the larger scale.

In brief, the |∆-1 quanta of entropy of any lower scale will become *the constant used to transfer information in the upper scale. So the h-planck constants of the radiation scale, become the ‘unit of photonic information’ transferred around in electrons and particles ( h-spin). Then the electron, trapped as a cyclical particle, becomes the unit of information transferred between molecules. Then simple molecules (hormones) become the unit of information transferred between cells. And huge molecules on the order of one billion ties (hence a new scale) becomes the unit of information of genetic organisms. And so on:*

*Law of emergence: ∑ |Spe ∆-1 > O-Tiƒ*

Those are the hidden laws of the Universe scientists completely ignore. So they will never understand a dot of it, till they accept the obvious scientific facts we explain in this blog…

And the not so obvious, but real elements of pure information, and ‘will’, the temporal facts, which scientists have a harder time to deal with, such as the phenomena of resonance – how two forms equal in information resonate through scales. Information indeed have many ‘spooky’ effects, which humans will never accept because their ‘dogmas’ about what is truth, are arrogant, abstract concepts of ‘absolute truth’ (which never exists except in the being itself that has all its information), themes those deal in our posts on epistemology.

One of those information phenomena that will never be accepted unless the tenants of the organic fractal paradigm are considered real, is of course the fact that there are mind mappings of reality, since we cannot see internally minds, only perceive ours through self-reflection and see them ‘living’, and ‘willing’ through external actions. Yet precisely it is the *fact we shall now consider that all beings of the Universe do perform the same actions, what proves according to the ‘homologic method’ of ‘external comparison’ of beings, the existence of those minds in all realities.*

In the graph the main constants of physics: - Tƒ x Sp (∆±3) c speed, which is the constant of space-time, our rod of measure of space and time (hence as Einstein did understood always constant regardless of the observers’ speed).

-∆-2:Tƒ: e: charge, the time clock of our world, defined by k, the Coulomb constant of curvature speed of the ∆-2 scale.

-∆+3:Tƒ: G, the same constant for the cosmological world.

Both are the unified constants of Tƒ/Sp: density of information/curvature/attraction between masses and charges.

-∆: Sp: K-Boltzmann: the constant of entropy, or expansive space of the thermodynamic scale.

– Neutron mass= Proton + electron masses. The Scalar, Active Magnitude or Constant of Existence, AU of the electromagnetic scale, equivalent to the Mass of the primordial black hole of the Cosmological Scale, *from where through the breaking of multiple symmetries all other constants will be born.*

**Quantitative science translated to the Organic paradigm. **

Universal Constants, are ratios of entropy & density of form, of energy and information, of the 3 fractal elements of the Generator, which create its species.

So we can integrate in time or in space, the cycle of space-time, in space we will find bidimensional organs made of networks of fractal points with part, with width. And this is therefore the fundamental departure of space analysis, the understanding of its non-Euclidean fractal points through which infinite parallels of energy and information cross to create together networks that become topological planes and membranes of the scalar, fractal Universe.

In time those planes its points and more complex social organisms made of 3 varieties of energetic, reproductive and information 2-manifol layers, will be studied as a function of variations, a differential equation e call the function of existence, in which we have 2 variables, cyclical space and vital time or energy and information, in most cases and a law that makes them interact in inverse fashion s/Tƒ= K. This allows us to play with existential algebra, and build up more complex worlds from simplex universe.

Of course, while we open new avenues to mathematics and logic, we do translate classic elements of those sciences to the whys of relational space-time.

Now as always the simplest proofs of the bidimensionality of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, are mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. He fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X^{3}+Y^{3}≠ Z^{3}, the famous Fermat Theorem. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) al*beit without commutative properties. *An interesting property for more advanced courses.

So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, -, – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, -, -, -, -, ….. , -. Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.

Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal space-like.

We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.

Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time:

*Past-Sp>Future-Tƒ: field>particles.*

Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wave-bodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4^{th} dimension of motion:

∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers -> 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) -> 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form)/

Space as expansive, decelerating entropic field-motion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.

WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.

But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Sp-fields/limbs Tƒ-Heads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.

Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensions-motions of time: past, present and future.

What is the difference between them? We shall soon get to it. But first we must resolve the implications of a time described as a cycle. First the obvious: if time is a cycle, there are infinite times, and what physicists call lineal time, absolute time, is as Leibniz, the philosopher said to Newton – well not to Newton, who would not receive him, but to Clarke, a ‘friend of a friend’ – is just the pegging together of all those finite time cycles.

Next, if time is a cycle – and here is where the insights of Einstein have its value – we can SEE time, as long as the cycle is fast enough to close in less time that the eye takes into seeing. So all ‘time cycles’ that close in less than the second the eye takes into make a ‘still picture’ of the Universe.

And this brings us the solution to the second Principle of Physics: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. The relativity of all motions, which can not be distinguished from stillness, *when the cyclical motion is fast enough to seem a solid form in the case of closed time cycles, or when we are moving along the frame of reference of the other motion with the same ‘spatial lineal speed’.*

So in the same manner that Mr. Einstein built his Relativity on the aforementioned principle, (only referred to lineal space, as he never understood cyclical time), we shall build a much more rich meaning for the Universe, on the aforementioned principle, based in the duality of cyclical time forms of information or time clocks in motion and lineal space forms or distances and line motions.

The reproduction of Motion dominates the perception of form. A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

Now, it is important to understand that the Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind things otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox. The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form

**2-manifolds as motions of time.**

*‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals*“. Ulam

* In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.*

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions . Spaces are lineal, open extensions’. *

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

Once this is clear. We shall state the obvious fact that a line is a small step of a cycle. This Kepler already said it, geodesics proved, pan geometry reaffirmed, and the experimental evidence was provided by Relativity as special relativity (lineal) was found to be the limit in empty space-time of General relativity cyclical, *which is the limit in a single plane of 5D of ∆ST.*

Further on the second great reduction of physics is the study only of external locomotions, one of the 6 motions of the Universe. And this has also established clear limits in mathematical physics. So we shall recall for those who didn’t read the introduction:

**Aristotle vs. Kepler: The 6 motions of timespaces and the 2 fields of mathematics.**

Now on the realist view, mathematics should always be referred to samples on the sciences in which it applies, and to the only science which is above it – T.Œ, that is the whole mental=mathematical, Organic= bio-logical, causal=logic properties of the Universe. So we bring always two checks to mathematical statement from below – scientific experimental proof and from above, T.Œ, even more generic laws, and discharge models of mathematics which do not conform with those 2 above and below realities.

Why this is necessary is due to the inflationary nature of languages, and the still-bias of all minds to fix ‘time-motions’ into space-forms, that are seemingly more durable, more truth and occupy less space.

This fact also plagues the errors of mathematics, among which the most obvious is to consider dimensions only as form, not as motions, and try to construct dimensional beings made only of spatial dimensions.

Another error is to misunderstand in its application to physics and all sciences the cyclical nature of space by a single lineal external time motion. This error proper of physics however cripples into many methods of mathematical equation-solving notably in the fields of analysis, so closely intermingled with mathematical physics that cannot be distinguished.

And also in a field, whose philosophy and justification has always been faulty – the field of probabilities and causality of time processes associated to it.

And ultimately in one field which is essential to reality mathematics does handle properly in many methodologies but needs a far more profound foundations: the dualities and transformations between space and time states in beings. So for example, a population in space is handled with the same Gaussian curves that a probability of events. Why is that? why populations in space distribute as events in time? This is a deep thought. Why topological methods allow to resolve algebraic equations? And so on. In that regard mathematics fascinates the ‘dual-thinker’ who understands the symmetries of space-time, as *mathematical methods have this duality embedded in the very same structure of its systems of equations, theorems and postulates. *

It is thus important to have a general introduction to the nature of reality, taken as usual from the first line posts, to ‘place’ mathematics in the context of reality, starting by understanding a fact missed by all minds, and humans in general:

“Time dominates space, motion dominates dimensional form, cycles dominate lines, organisms dominate mechanisms’

The Universe is made of infinite motions, which can be perceived by the principle of relativity (‘We cannot distinguish motions from form’ Galileo->Poincare->Einstein), either in stillness or motion.

*And this allows ‘carefully’, knowing what we do, to apply spatial methods to resolve motion problems and vice versa.*

Thus beings have 2 components motion and form. What is form in stillness, will be studied in detail. What is motion, was first defined by Aristotle: a change in the form of beings.

There were then mostly organic changes of generation, growth, evolution, diminution, extinction, and a 6th lesser important motion, translation in space, which physicists study.

But this is only one of 6 motions, reason why physics cannot be the science of all sciences, as it merely studies those systems which realise multiplex external motion inn space. And it makes of this ‘concept’ of single external lineal motion, brought about by the use of Cartesian ‘Universal coordinates’, the only reasons of science.

This truly limits physics in its scope.

Further on by the reduction of all time motions or ‘changes’, which already Aristotle, the philosopher, classified in 6 types, ‘conception’, ‘change of internal form or evolution’, ‘extinction’, ‘growth in size’, ‘diminution’ and ‘locomotion’ to a single time motion ‘locomotion’, today called ‘translation in space’, physicists reduce time to a parameter that measures exactly and only that – translations in space.

And that would be Ok, if they acknowledge the other forms of time-change as relevant to truth. Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.

Now, as Physicists call its Theory of Locomotions, the Theory Of Everything or T.O.E, we shall call the theory of Philosophers of Science, which includes ALL the 6^{th} Times motions of the beings of the Universe, a Theory of the Organic Everything or T.Œ as:

– it includes all things, and all motions, among which the most– 5 of them – have an organic nature (generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction). So we consider the not even found T.O.E, an inorganic simplex, description of physicists with a single lineal time motion a ‘limiting’ reduced version of the larger T.Œ.

Further on as all modern developments in mathematics and physics consider lineal inertial systems, just a short small view of cyclical, accelerated/decelerated systems – such is the case of the pan geometry of Lobachevski, where only for reduced distances space is Euclidean, becoming exponential, hyperbolic for larger ones; of the study of General Relativity and the motions of the galaxy at large scale, where all motions happen in an accelerated galactic vortex, towards its center; in the study of fields; in the study of fractal spaces; in the study of Earth geodesics that only in short distances become planes; in the study of life cycles that only in small moments become invariable, in the study of the theory of Lineal Functions and Analysis, where only in short distances a curve function is approximated by a lineal tangent, etc. etc. we shall consider the lineal concepts of time and space, a limit of a much larger cyclical view of the Universe.

**The worldcycle of existence: travels through the 5 ^{th} dimension.**

Now as I was a poet of words, a painter of images, with my Sp: I=Eye<Wor(l)d: Tƒ, my spatial and temporal ‘human senses’ , my function of STi-ence, before I became a mathematician, I like to extract the deepest ‘genetic grammar’ of the English language, so you will see those ‘games of words’.

I think therefore I Exist. That was the title of my first short film (-; Present is all, it is existence in preSenT, to combine your spatial and temporal functions into energy and information. So you will see in some texts, the Function of Existence in present space-time, as an entity of Energy and Information, written as Tƒ<ST<Sp.

This is a deep word, Tƒ is your head-particle of logic < your flow of form and orders to your ST wave-body of energy and information, which exists in a field of space-time, St, where it will perform your actions.

So all it is resumed in the function of existence, To Exi=st is all (if we were to use the concept of Energy and Information as rough synonymous of space-time). The details of the Infinite Cycles of Existence of the Universe is what ExiStential Stiences do. Play with words. Do not think that only mathematical languages display all the beauty of the Universe, love and live with your human I=Eye<Wor(l)d, do art, believe in social love, the essence of the 5th dimension, BE HUMAN, because you ARE and your languages MATTER as much as those of mater do

So to fully grasp the 3 x 3 symmetries of the Universe, specially, the co-existence of several scales of infinitesimals into larger wholes I coined the concept of a super organism, each being a cell of the species – the super organism of the larger scale of the 5th dimension, which lasted more in time.

And man a super organism, each citizen a cell of mankind. I resolved then the meaning of Gods, the subconscious collective of a civilization, I classified them all, find their cycles of life and death, solved the 3 ages of its mental life, the 3 styles of art of all civilizations, the young epic art, classic and baroque informative age. And finally wrote the sequential equation of all time space world cycles of life and death:

Es: Youth (max. Spatial Extension) > ST: Adult, reproductive age > Tƒ-Informative, Future old age.

So the 3 topologies of space that formed beings have a sequential order, the 3 ages of life. Now we can always see a system in space or in time. And with any degree of detail. Let us then see some of the elements of the previous graph.

Let us see of those symmetries the 3 horizons of evolution of species, in its symmetry between spatial forms and temporal ages; starting from the earlier biological species, through the human being, ending in the Whole, the globalized planet, which contrary to all abstract, anthropomorphic descriptions of reality is NOT longer evolving us, human beings… as it SHOULD BE if T.Œ, the Organic paradigm dominated our world.

*Each scale of size of the fifth dimension was then study by a different science, from the smallest quantum physics through chemistry to biology, history, Geology, astrophysics and cosmology. But only the metric laws of the 5th dimension and the properties of cyclical time could find the common laws of all of them, as all species followed a world cycle: *

**All together now. Travels in the 5th dimension.**

It is though a creative Universe that doesn’t disdain other ‘combinations’ of the 3 relative PRF arrows of time.

Thus we must combine motions through space (space-time actions), its sum and order through the 3 ages of time (life-death cycles) and motions through the lower and larger scales of the 5th dimension, to obtain all possible motions of the Universe, inner evolutionary motions, outer, physical motions, and ‘metaphysical, existential’ motions as we live and die emerging as social organisms and dissolving on those planes of the 5th dimension:

*Travels through the 5 ^{th} dimension. The anti-particle that is born in the relative past point on a Feynman Diagram, as the entropy arrow that annihilates the future arrow of the particle, creating a present wave; the palingenetic seed of seminal, genetic information that is born in the relative past ∆-1 plane of organic existence to accelerate forwards with its faster, efficient time cycles that have erased all the trials and errors of topological wrong mutational evolution, to remember the perfect human beings; and the canonical memetic man carrier of the message of eusocial love, the code of information of the 5^{th} dimension or absolute arrow of future that creates wholes departing from its lesser parts, or prophet of a civilization, which will teach its clone believers to share energy and information among them to create a superorganism of history, are 3 examples of the astounding beauty and intelligent f the harmonic Planes of reality, of self-similar, all explained by the 10 isomorphic elements described in space, time and 5D scales by the Generator equation, which for Human species are:*

In the graph some curious time travels, and combinations of time motions: an annihilation of a future to past and past to future (Feynman diagrams) antiparticle and particle, a seminal seed, travelling upwards through a 5^{th} dimension and a memetic, ‘seminal’ book of revelation, mental linguistic seed of a social organism of mankind.

And so we formulate the following statement: ‘all what exists are motions through the 5^{th} dimension’, which will allow to formalize everything with 5D metric.

What it is not all the motions of time, is the simple, worldline of Absolute space-time physics. A constant motion of time, without changes of states (which make the function non-differentiable on those regions the state changes). This is a useful simplification better suited to study motions of lineal, differentiable nature, in which a change of age or state of time happens, (as from a gaseous-young, energetic state to a liquid, to an informative solid one, or through the different time speeds that define different ages of life).

**The worldcycle of Time is all.**

Time is understood in perfect terms in the logic, Chinese age, foundation of the Chinese most successful culture of the west. The east did understand the ternary logic of time, its past, yang energy and future yin information that combine to reproduce the infinite beings of present.

How 2500 years ago, those 4 verses of the Tao-te-king in chapter one ch’ang, the function of existences, could arrive to this sophisticated level of thought, we don’t know. Ch’in, the unifying, lineal emperor, who brought iron swords and weapons to China, forbade Taoism, and burnt all its rational book, only some memorized texts and magic rituals remained. It had though embedded China of its fundamental logic, in the yin-yang duality, and even the way the Chinese language constructs itself with equal subject-object dualities responds to that tuning with the fundamental principles of the Universe.

As a result the Universe have given China the biggest prize: survival. It is the most successful culture of the world, since India cannot be considered one culture but at least two – south/northern, further split in 2, Islam/Hinduism, and colonized. China thus has the maximal GDP today at PPP, the maximal population, it has survived the longest of all cultures but unfortunately all that knowledge of the first age of understanding of time and its conservation laws is gone.

The western world is a lineal culture of visual, fetish, go(l)d and weapons cult(ure)s, today globalized, where time matters far less than space, cyclical information far less (unless properly mediated by a machine), than lineal energy, and so where 1/2 of time reality and the most important O-motions disappear.

They of course are there, but always limited by curious concepts that erase its power: clocks become uncoiled into lines, cyclical inertia mediated by an invisible centripetal force, the curvature of timespace converted into accelerated gradients, r=evolutionary panting is cubism, a lineal art not ‘cyclicality’ – the Taoist love for curve, all gone of our art, where even the old ionic curves have been reduced to lineal skyscrapers. So we shall regret the loss of the Taoist age of knowledge of the essence of time, for the time being.

**CONCLUSION: THE 3±I MOTIONS OF TIME.**

The Universe is a sum of motions through the 5th dimension, as only when motion exists we need to define a space (the form that moves) and time (motion). And so epistemology is the knowledge about a being of the maximal information about its ST events which is all what exists, of truth 1. The language will reduce that truth 1 to a 2-manifold mental mapping of it.

The universe or rather reality is eternal because the 3 simple time motions, ≤≈≥ do have a zero-sum value as they erase each other between life and death, so do the ±∆ actions of absorption and emission of energy and information.

So before we go into an analysis of those 3 time motions further studied in independent posts, we must enunciate this principle of ‘CONSERVATION OF TIME MOTION’, in proper scientific terms. As science has done, calling it the Principle of Conservation of Energy, considering ‘energy’ a ‘concept’, which in physics that resumes all ‘motions in time’ of which 2 are paramount, kinetic energy or lineal-entropic motions and potential energy, or cyclical vortex-like motion (charges and masses and their position in larger cyclical accelerated vortices of motion or ‘fields’).

Now, if we divide the Universe roughly in a given ‘plane of the 5th dimension’ in two type of motions, lineal momentum and angular momentum, which correspond roughly to two type of energies; kinetic ‘lineal energy’, and potential energy, in as much as kinetic energy is contained in the motion of a single particle as lineal momentum is, but potential energy requires as all cyclical motions, 2 ‘elements’, the focus or centre point of the field of forces and the position of the particle. And so we consider that lineal and angular momentum are the ‘spatial slices’ or ‘steps’ of space that time integrates, as it adds those ‘small steps’ into the whole ‘time’ function. So according to our formula, which relates space and time in its most generic terms:

∫S=T

We should obtain from ∫ Lineal momentum =Time Function: ∫ mv = 1/2 mv², which as it happens is indeed Kinetic energy, the ‘scalar’ time function that integrates lineal momentum.

We can by similar but more complex mathematical reasoning compare angular momentum and potential energy, as it becomes obvious that angular momentum does not really changes the position of the being which constantly returns at the point.

There is NOT however a third type of ‘basic momentum’, which we could call ‘vibratory momentum’, as all oscillatory motions can be described as combinations of | and O-momentums. According to the fundamental law of dimensions, which are constructed departing from two initial poles of motion and/or form.

But there are other forms of energy to be considered, *and those are energies that require to be account for different planes of space-time the fifth dimension. And so it is not possible to do a physical description of time motions properly without 5D metrics.*

*Indeed. When we define a system in physical space-time, as in any other relative space-time we do have to account for the ternary 5D structure of the system, U±i, in this case, the quantum, electromagnetic, molecular, thermodynamic and gravitational, cosmic scales. And so the system will display our 2 types of energy≈time in each scale of existence, and then there will be exchanges of ‘motion’ and ‘information’, between the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, to total all the motions of time≈energy of the system, integration of all the little space-time actions of angular momentum and boosts of lineal momentum.*

Now, when we study those momentums and energies with relational space-time, they fit nicely in the larger scaffolding of the general laws of all 5D motions and systems.

The problem of those concepts in classic physics is that they have no clear logic understanding of of it. Since mathematical physics is handicapped in its development but the limited verbal-logic intelligence of their practitioners. So for example, the best time physicist, Einstein would merely say that ‘time is what a clock measures’ . While there is not really any conceptual definition of Energy, even if very few ‘arrogant physicists’ acknowledge they have no clue.

So we rewrite the fundamental principle of science – the conservation of energy – in terms of the conservation of the 3 motions of time, which roughly speaking (latter we shall differentiate those terms with more precision) are ‘entropy-energy-lineal motion/momentum’; ‘form-information-position-cyclical motion/momentum’ and its ‘vibratory, iterative, repetitive, hyperbolic combinations’:

‘Time never stops. All what exists is a combination of lineal energy motions and cyclical, positional motions that transform into each other ad eternal: Se<≈x≈>To”

The Universe is packed in a single sentence and formula, where Se< represents all varieties of lineal motions, >To, all varieties of cyclical motion, and ≈ or x represent the iterative combinations of both type of motions, in 2 essential sub-groups:

- Perpendicular, ‘Darwinian’ combinations, X, in which the entropic and informative motions tend to annihilate each other (as in death processes, antiparticle-particle collisions and other erasing ‘big-bang’ procedures)
- And parallel ≈ symbiotic combinations, which become ‘stable, organic’ systems, made of O-heads/particles, |-limbs/fields and Ø-waves/bodies.

**The properties that change as we collapse the extreme motion and order into U± <∆ scales.**

So this is a first approach a way of explaining the whole range of scales as a series of Russian dolls, which collapse into the human being, and as they do so:

- They become more ‘messed up’ in its combinations of pure form and pure motion. So instead of pure motion, we call ‘generically’ the more messed up motions ‘energy’, and as pure form becomes more messed up we call the more messed up forms generically ‘information’. And so we can state in those closer U± regions that ‘the universe is a game that transforms back and forth spatial energy into temporal clocks of information ad eternal, and write instead of the Motion-distance vs. Form-time clocks equation, a messed up one:

Se x Tƒ = U±4

This is the metric equation of the 5th dimension (if time is called the 4th) that puts together all the other planes of existence, as constant space-times with increasingly smaller space-distances that collapse towards the human scale:

Se x Tƒ = ∆

- And as they do so, they also become more equal in its Se x Tƒ components, which are more messed up in temporal form and more similar in spatial size. So you are made of ‘cells’, which is what you emit when you have a seminal creative moment, and they are very similar to you, compared to the perfectly spherical, smallish black holes that emit perfectly infinitely long strings of gravitation. This is not so pure and perfect, it is more messed up but as life proves it makes things much more creative an interesting. It creates a much more various Universe.

- Finally it becomes obvious that the Universe is not that pure simple Relativity description of the U±4 scale of pure gravitational forces and masses, neither the next scale of light-space and galaxies of astrophysicists. And that there is not a single space-time continuum.
*This again is a problem of physicists which are astoundingly arrogant, and decide that the thing they study is the ONLY thing; the clock they use to measure all those time cycles is the ONLY clock of time, the only cycle and so on. Not so, there are a big number of planes of existence, and for many reasons of quantitative and empirical analysis we settle in those U±4 panes.*

And there are infinite clocks of time, with different speeds as we have seen, related to the size and distance of the system. So all together form a Fractal Universe of multiple planes of spaces and times. Whereas as in a fractal, all parts seem the same, as in a fractal the closer we come to a point the bigger it becomes and the more information it shows. So the next stage of ∆ST theory is to quantify all those planes together, and find a relationship between all those distances-speeds and different O-clocks of time, which is called a metric. The metric of the 5th dimension.

*The life world cycle.*

In this geometry, the life worldlines of physicists are world cycles, as we add ‘depth dimensions’ of cellular, social organization across 3 ∆-scales: the cellular/atomic (physical biologic systems) individual and social/cosmic scales. So life is a cycle across those 3 scales, a travel through them and we shall expand on it.

Now think of your life. It is in fact a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension. You are born in the lower scale of cells, as a seminal seed. Then you grow in size and slow down in your life rhythms and you are born, and keep growing and slowing down till you die and then you regress back to the previous scale of size.

You do exist traveling in the 5th dimension.

Moreover all species of the Universe follow the same process. They are born as a small seed, which grows enormously in size absorbing the energy of the Universe that surround them till they explode back in a big-bang.

A black hole for example, it is born as a exceedingly small seed inside stars and grows very fast eating the star or the planet and then it all explodes into a big-bang. He is traveling through the 5th dimension.

So that is the second isomorphism of the Universe, the life-death cycle that all its species and systems follow.

Remember also we found an Isomorphism of forms, heads and particles of information on one side, and bodies and fields of energy. This is called ‘isomorphism’, equal forms. And there are more…

So now we shall study* how the 3 fundamental properties of reality, its time cycles, enclosing vital spaces, across several scales of the fifth dimension structure the fundamental space-time event of reality:*

*The worldcycle of life and death.*

THE SIX MOTIONS OF A WORLDCYCLE REDUCED TO LOCOMOTION IN CLASSIC PHYSICS.

*‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals*“. Ulam

*In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’ (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 6 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic, moving youth> reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 6 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC ‘young’ locomotions and its worldlines (which we will show to be partial cases of the reproduction of information carried by a wave), unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 6 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.*

So a world cycle has six motions, where locomotion is the dominant motion of an entropic young system (gaseous, youngster, predator animal).

And so for each species we can study in depth a world cycle through the sequence of its six motions and also study each motion as an entire discipline, which is basically what physicists do, as the ‘science of motion’ (definition in the XIX c. of the overblown discipline).

Now, the most important of those motions is reproduction, as the universe is a reproductive fractal, so we could actually consider locomotion also a form of reproduction. Let us then upgrade by the correspondence system the present scientific concept of locomotion, as wave reproduction of form by translation in space.

**REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED.**

**Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.**

The Universe reproduces information. It does both: it erases it with entropic big-bangs, and evolves it with the arrow of informative warping of fields of entropy into vortices of charges and masses.

But *the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ and its integral of energy in all systems of nature. IT is what the Universe preserves.*

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, *a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does.*

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

But motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in as much as particles travel as waves, and only become particles of information when they ‘stop’, on an instrument of measure, and so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

For example, you are the vital information which becomes imprinted in changing, indistinguishable CHNO atoms, as your ‘real scale’ of being, is ∆-1, the cellular genetic code; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom. A wave Motion is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independents of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

And so there is no need to reproduce a wave of ðime§pace motion below the level of ¥- light ðime§pace the ultimate level that matters in our Universe.

How the simple mathematical reproductions take place in Nature? Obviously through the mathematical proportions of the ternary Universe, as reproduction of information in ternary moving ‘fractal points’ self-centred in the singularity move the system along the path of the point wave.

The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal and those are the equations that define those proportional morons along the pi-phi-path; and its exponential growth through ∆-scales. In the middle we can see a simple example of this ternary pi-phi motion: a proton, intersection of three paths, which expands dynamically one of them to produce an electron, or inversely absorb it.

*Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.*

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5D will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans *perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we **have *to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞):

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic arrow of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower scale of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

**The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.**

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

**Conclusion. A more complex logic of time arrows.**

To systematize the time motions of the Universe for each species, and to establish its causal relationship, departing from Aristotle we establish the only possible motions in time of the fractal 5ST Universe: changes in the parameters of energy, information and ∆-scales of the being, which will either emit energy (locomotion), absorb it (feeding), emit information (reproduction), absorb it (communication), and evolve into larger wholes (social evolution, generation) or devolve (death): ±∆, Se, Tƒ. An eye of time a worldcycle that returns to its origin is the minimal unit of the Universe.

All in the Universe is made of such worldcycles, and all what the Universe does is to repeat world cycles.

Reproduction is thus synonymous of reproduction of a worldcycle, of the passing of time. By the mere fact that time exists and it is an immortal winding and unwinding of time clocks, seen in present space-time as a steady tic repetition of the frequency of worldcycles, which however are expanding or diminishing its energy and information, < > , till they repeat themselves.

The reality of the Universe as it is due to the reproduction of its time tics, time frequencies, time cycles, make it a wonder for an of the eyes of time that focuses existences into a mapping of reality in synchronous space. It is at the end of the tunnel of existence of micro worlds, where hiding into the knowledgeable perception, it is the perceiver of its time cycles, its collective mind-point, its relative God.

*In the graph, the perception of the world **cycle of existence in a synchronic, simultaneous way, which stresses the balanced wave-present-body state in which the entropic field and the informative field, both work to maintain the system in a balance between its information and energy components: Spe<ST>Tiƒ.*

Those 6 motions of time will be the origin of all space-time events of the Universe and its rules define the cycles of space-time of all beings, of which the world cycle of existence is obviously the most important. The order of those motions though will happen in such a fashion that at the end all the processes when integrated along 3 scales, 3 forms and 3 arrows of time will give us a zero sum, that is all locomotions will balance with the energy fed to the system (emission and absorption of energy), and all life organizations upwards in the scales of the 5th dimension will be compensated by al the deaths downwards.

This the ultimate truth of reality: the whole Universe is immortal for each of its parts to live a finite cycle of existence. But each existence itself is immortal in the reproduction of its present form through the different space-time actions of the Universe.

As a wave of actions forms, for each being there will be then the perspective of steady reproduction, of informative perception of the wave as it diminishing in time or space, each variation of the fundamental mode of reproduction SxT-> ∑st: becomes then a different variation on the same eternal theme, the completion of worldcycles, the repetition of existences, the closing of conservative paths of energy and information feed back cycles, S<≈>T, which define the Universe, constantly as flows of energy and information web new forms that become parts of wholes, which a new eye of time will reorder as a superorganism, preying on it, growing as a subconscious collective god-mind, emerging to become a new point-mind of the whole. As information copies its fractal structure and becomes a mind-organism, then all becomes simple and then complex and then simple in reproductive waves across 3 ∆+-1 planes of existence.

**Reproduction is all.**

Now the entire world cycle when studied from the integrative perspective of the ages and purpose of a supœrganism is focused into the immortal reproduction of the system.

Thus since motion is reproduction of form, there is *only a fundamental process in the universe, reproduction, the purpose of all existences. *

But we shall increase our analysis to accommodate variations on the same theme, and so we will focus in the 6 type of motions, according to the degree of change occurring in the being; *always defining them in terms of the reproductive universal motion of all beings.*..

**DETAILED ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS MOTIONS**

**The three fundamental motions: decelerating entropy, steady state wave, vortex acceleration of information.**

To start with we come to the study of the three fundamental motions of the Universe, or changes in time, which in reproductive terms, means that *each repetition of a motion will be a shrinking motion, hence an informative motion, an expansive motion hence an entropic motion or a repetitive motion, hence a perfect steady-state present motion without apparent change on the being:*

*The three fundamental motions of the Universe, expand, repeat or implode the being in each ‘step’ or quantum of motion. They correspond in the pure study of motion, to entropic ‘deceleration’ which ends the motions into a final state of space, present repetitive motions which can be eternal (as waves of light ‘almost are’) or informative, accelerated vortices of motion, which end when they reach the central singularity.*

*In the graph, the simplest variation of the three modes of reproduction of form is ‘set’ by the existence of irrational numbers, which do not close the circle but allow a beat of opening an closing spiral mouths, inward or outward-looking.*

What other fundamental motions can we then consider. We could consider the motions=changes of the entity in time as the series of motion that ‘generate’ a world cycle of existence, but it seems more proper to study those motions (generation, evolution, emergence, growth etc.) in the isomorphism of life ages an its worldcycles; not in pure reproductive motions or locomotions.

Hence considering the subdivisions of the father of all philosophers, in what regards the depth and exhaustive analysis of all relevant rational concepts about the Logos, Mind of the organic Universe, Mr. Aristotle, we shall consider the following ‘other forms of reproductive’ motions, besides the three essential ones.

Aristotle’s account of motion can be found in the Physics. By motion, Aristotle understands any kind of change. In his jargon he defines motion as the actuality of a potentiality. So *in principle *Aristotle has a classification of motions, as the whole range of stages of the life cycle, ∆-1 ‘generation & evolution’, ‘young growth’, ‘mature reproduction’, ‘old age diminution’ and ‘extinction’

**So all motions are ‘stages’ of the motion of a worldcycle through the fifth dimension.** EVEM ‘reproductive variations of loco-motion’, *are the same essential universal event, a reproduction of information in scales of the fifth dimension.*

**5TH ISOMORPHISM**

** ACTIONS: THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE**

**CONSTANTS DERIVED OF ACTIONS: Max. ∑ ExI (s=t)**

What is all about? The survival of a point of view, which maps in stillness a world of information and tries to imprint its universe with mirror images of its self, clone images that become cells of a superorganism. Order is repetition of information, in present body-waves that maximise, ExI, the parts of a point of view. We can describe all this in a simple formalism known as the function of existence, whose development in 3 phases, of max. E, youth-past-gaseous-entropic state, max. i, future, old-informative-solid state/ age, and Max. E xI (e=i) balances steady liquid state form a world cycle.

Let us then study after we have analysed the topology of the Universe its ‘existential algebra’, which is the origin of the algebraic equations of sciences.

**The function of existence: Max. e xi (s=t)**

In the graph, the function of existence in 3 ages, with its maximal point of balance in the wave-female, s=t, max. ExI state, between the field, of maximal entropy and the particle of maximal information, which combine into the 2 ‘male states of max. entropy (particle disintegrating its information) and maximal information (particle transforming the field-limbs motion into informative perception).

Both together provide also a gender interpretation of the states of the being and its complementarity wave-particle, female-male, body-head elements which prey on the limb/field of energy as they travel through its ages and trace a whole world cycle -already provided by the bagua of earlier taoism, the first analysis of existential algebra in human sciences:

In the simplest description of the Universe, we can talk of the use of existential algebra, which studies in detail the space-time actions of all points of view that first gauge information, create a still mapping of the Universe, and then try to imprint a territorial field of energy with the perceived form, enacting its imagination, as an act of survival of its self, which becomes the body of its organism, which will through a series of isomorphic actions of absorption of energy and information, trace a world cycle, step by step of present repetition of its wave-body actions and informative perception, e>i, on its field-particle state, till finally it becomes so unbalanced, as the wave is present but the particle-field male state is E>I integrative and diminish the energy of the system, hence defining an overall arrow:

Female Present-wave-body state: S=T + Past>Future, field>particle male state = ∆I: Life arrow + E:Death arrow: Big bang=0

**CONSERVATION LAWS: THE ETERNAL PRESENT**

Now because of the Principle of relativity, likely better expressed by Poincare – what we call here the Galilean paradox – the incapacity to distinguish motion from form

**The conservation of ST-presents.**

The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into ST-waves-bodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.

Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: *‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.*

This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative space-frm and time-motion, or O-x |=Ø, that is an event which is creative.

The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = Ø-Present, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆-Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:

Sp = ∞ x O = Time point -> Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.

Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.

The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.

Which has by definition, *one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.*

So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.

What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrino-giravtational connections.

So we are gravitational beings.

We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, c-speed or 0 temperature or H-planck.

The Universe is immortal in 0-sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinite-simal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.

The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.

Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Sp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.

*Coincidentia Oppositorum, said* Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

**The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.**

Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.

Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:

A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.

Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.

Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.

And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:

Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:

Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:

Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).

Now here the convention I have adopted is to *Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.*

This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.

But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.

A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:

|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles

And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:

|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.

So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.

If in the future anyone goes through my 30 years of research in all this, they will then find that I profusely use those symbols.

But trust me if you really understand T.Œ which is more a question of mental attitude, the understanding will be clear from the beginning.

**The generator equation.**

So I wrote the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its space-time combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

**Γ**. Generator: Toroid Sp(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ST(st) (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)

Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

Or as Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So I could classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since Nature ‘*pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous*, spatial organisms.

Yet that is always a simultaneous organic construction, or rather superorganjc, as it is made of smaller beings which are also super organisms, controlled by the central point of view-network, the elliptic ‘sub-system’ of information that controls it all, in the 3 x 3 +0 decametric structure of all systems. So in the 10 sub-systems of the human super organism, it is the brain, the 10th element; in a 10 military system will be the sergeant, the captain, the general of each 10, 100, 1000 scalar levels. And in a simple tetraktys, similar to the billiard triangle, the central dark ball which coordinates all other balls, by being precisely in the middle, able to communicate with them all and organise the whole system.

**A exhaustive classification for each being its 7 type of Constants.**

Now, in order to qualify quantitative through constants a given systems, we can establish a series of basic constants according to our previous ∆•ST classification.

In a loose, we could talk of 7 type of constants, for any of the ±∆•ST systems of the Universe:

±Social constants of the 2 arrows of its ∆-scales

±Constants of S-topologies and T-ages and its ratios.

±Constants of the Generator, S<st>t of the system.

And a 7th type of constant that maps out in stillness a certain mind.

However unlike the other isomorphisms, where there is a surprising ‘neat’ relationship between the number of the isomorphism and the type of elements we define (1.generator, 2.st bidimensional systems, 3. time ages, ±4 planes in which an ∆0 being communicates, 5 actions, 6 species, 8 motion, 9 scales and 10 planes), the 7th constants are chose to adjust better to that number; given the fact that the vital constants of the internal being, the universal, external constants of the world and those of each of those ±4 planes with which the being interact, and those of each of its sub-species of the ∆±1 scales, etc, make them quasi-infinite in number.

So not to be exhaustive, we shall choose 7 in the sense of ‘general ±∆, ±ST, ±s<st>T & 0-Mind type of constants.

**Classification by ∆-regions.**

In that sense a simple way to classify the constants that act in a being is to divide them into:

*-Internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC)*

–*External, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ *(ab. UC), of the larger world with which the system communicates, absorbing and emitting energy and information.

Those types of constants are the most studied and so they are clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems

For each of those planes, the physical Active Magnitude (∆C) and its constants of action will be the mosre important, giving origin to:

*– Internal<=>External exchanges;* with its 5 sub-constants of actions performed by the inner being in the outer world: ÅC.

Those are better studied in biology, as they acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human.

So as we grow from entropic to informative scales and study those ±∆ ‘constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies in biology.

*Linguistic Constants: Universal Grammar and beauty constants.* Finally we can also consider as reflection of reality the Universal grammar and syntax, proportions and beauty (E=T) BALANCES of language and art, as ‘constants ratios’ , which illustrate perfectly the concept of balance and conservation of ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, of classic art.. It is the mental creative analysis of constants of beauty considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the ∆o mind of man).

Now if we want to be more specific we can make a brief summary of the main constants we shall find in terms of the 3 elements of the Generator in each of those 3 classifications.

Vital Constants: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.

Å.C.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.

U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale.

And similar V.Constants of the larger physical planes:

It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. But we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.

The 7th isomorphism is more technical and perhaps the one of maximal interest to the quantitative age of ‘measure science’ we live in. Since it deals with all the Universal constants and vital constants and physical, chemical, biological, sociological, you name it, constants which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information, etc.

**In detail. Nature’s numbers as expressions of ∆st actions**

Constants of Nature are the quantitative ‘substance’ of ∆ST related to the Constancy of the S, T, ∆ elements of the Metric equation and its partial analysis. Thus the metric and the constants are the 2 essential isomorphisms that connect ∆ST and classic science.

Each of those space, time dimensions, scales, planes, and åctions between them must be defined by a Constant.

We use 5D ”symbols’ and names slightly changed in meaning for those main Constants, dividing them in internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), self-centred in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System (∆-constant, or main metric of the Œ-point), with its 5 sub-constants of action, ÅC.

More specifically:

∑ and ∏. The Se constants &Tƒ constants that relate Space and energy, ∑e=Spe, and Time and Information, ∏T=Tiƒ

3 S-Dimensional Constants related to the ‘extension and energy’ of the Sl, Sh and Sw dimensions.

T-Age Constants, related to the duration and inverse frequency rhythms of the 3 ages of time.

ST-constants, related to the topological shapes of its 3 bidimensional varieties.

Action Constants, related to the ratios of exchange of energy and information of the 5 åctions of the entity.

Social ∆-Plane Constants, related to the numerical ratios of Size and Speed ratios between ∆-planes (normally around a 10 factor), needed to transcend between social scales.

So Decametric constants are social § constants, till arriving to the discontinuous between planes that creates a whole.

As 10¹¹ individuals create an ∆+1 super organism. It is the final step of the game of existence played by all entities through its world cycles of space-time, as all systems are moved by their desire to maximize their existence, their vital space and cyclical time, formal motions.

Thus this max. Se x Tƒ, this mandate of existence means species try to climb the stair between planes.

**Drives of Existence: The constants of action of all systems.**

And both combine into Hyperbolic, Ø, Space-Time Fields, ST, in which energy and information combine, exi, to reproduce the system, STexi, which is achieved when e and i equal its value, S≈T, e=i, maximising its production, Max. E x I or function of ‘Exi=ST-ence” of the system, as this reproductive iterative present function, ST, is the goal of all systems, which can be resumed in a single statement:

‘The Universe is a fractal of present space-time systems that constantly iterate, by combining diffeomorphically (locally) relative past entropy fields of energy and relative future cyclical knot of information, |-Spe x O-Tiƒ = Ø-STexi”

If we observe those 3 motions as ‘still forms in space’, they give birth to the 3 ‘ONLY’ topologies of our Universe:

Toroid, lineal entropic past-forms – limbs/fields; spheric, informative, ‘future forms’ – heads/particles that *guide* the whole system towards its future; and in-between its combined, hyperbolic, bodies/waves that iterate the system.

In the next graph we show a basic spatial topological ‘isomorphism’ of all scales of the 5th dimension, constructed with 3 topologies, which always will be the only 3 topologies of the Universe, cyclical-informative centres, lineal, toroid larger space-boundaries and an intermediate territory of hyperbolic form:

In the graphs we see the 3 ages of time and 3 topologies of space, which become pegged into space-time organic parts in each being, which will then perform actions, dominant in energy or information according to that organic pegging. In the graph we see the human being born of that pegging, which performs the canonical motions-actions possible in all space-time beings.

WE map out the human being with all what we have learned to fully graph, what we are:

*In the graph, the Universe, including human beings is a fractal super organism of two formal motions, spatial energy and temporal information. You are a living fractal, as everything else in the universe, competing with infinite other fractals to survive, and the only thing that redeems you in the absolutely relative universe is the absolute arrow of eusocial evolution, the arrow of eusocial love that creates from parts wholes.*

It means also a new expansion of our paradigm of knowledge, as it implies that absolute relativity of the human T.Œ, over an other Œ: SpxTiƒ being of reality.

We are made of a finite amount of **energy** and **time**, as when we say, ‘I don’t have **time** and **energy** to do this’ – conscious that our **worldcycle** between conception and extinction, is limited by death.

“We are made of a finite amount of **energy** and **time**, which conforms our **worldcycle** between conception, in a l**ower plane, ∆-1, of cellular existence,** which emerges, **L, **in a **higher plane, ∆, **as a superorganism of a mass of billions, ∑, of cells, knotted, ∏, by our physiological, **E**-nergetic, **I**-nformative and **R**eproductive networks, which help us to perform a series of cyclical space-time ±∆ actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, in 3 sequential ages dominated by each of those networks, the young, relative past age of maximal energy, the adult age of balance of energy and information or reproductive, present age and the informative old age of maximal form, as we move and **a**ccelerate, **∆æ,** feed on **e**nergy, **∆e,** perceive and communicating **i**nformation, **∆œ**, copy our selves in an **o**ffspring of similar beings, our sons, ∆**œ**, and evolving socially, **∆û**, as part of an external **Universe, ∆+1**, with social beings of the same species**, **till our extinction, when the arrow of growing information and life reverses its path into an explosion of Energy called death, that erases all our information, devolving back, <<**,** two planes down from the **∆+1** society to the cellular **∆-1 **plane.”

‘We are all knots of time-space world cycles, minds synchnonize those cycles according to its time space symmetries, mapping out languages biased by the will of its acts of representation’

Next we show a human organism constructed with 3 topologies, which always will be the only 3 topologies of the Universe, cyclical-informative centres, lineal, toroid larger space-boundaries and an intermediate territory of hyperbolic form:

We see the 3 ages of time and 3 topologies of space, which become pegged into space-time organic parts in each being, which will then perform actions, dominant in energy or information according to that organic pegging. In the graph we see the human being born of that pegging, which performs the canonical motions-actions possible in all space-time beings.

In the lower graph we show man, a space-time being made of lineal energy and cyclical, temporal information, assembled in 3 parts, through cellular networks specialised in energy feeding, informative perception and reproduction, and the 3 ages of life between birth in a lower seminal scale and extinction. We write below the logic formalism that describes with simple equations of 5D space-time the organic parts in space and temporal ages of the human super-organism, the same equations we shall use to describe all systems of the Universe.

Finally, in the bottom, we see the decomposition of the worldcycle of existence of a human being into a sum of infinite actions, which together form THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, the fundamental ‘detailed’ equation of each species of the Universe.

*In the graph a human being described in the most abstract form with the generator equation of 5D space-time symmetries, its existential actions, levels of cellular , individual and social existence, world cycle of life from fetus to death, actions of space-time existence, which integrate in the whole world cycle, and its main ‘a,eiou’ actions of survival by exchanging energy and information with bodies and minds, reproduce the system, evolve socially with other humans into a whole, and of course, move in accelerated locomotions, the less important of the actions of the being, even if they are the most thoroughly researched by human scientists (physics).*

*It is what humans truly are, regardless of its selfish points of view in terms of space-time. Above its topological equation and energy-iterative-informative systems and ∆-scales in space (left) and time (right). Below our existential survival actions of exchange of energy and information, its reproduction and social evolution as wholes, within the external world. And yes, finally in ‘big size’, the ‘locomotions’ that physicists think to be certainly the most important and for most the only form of time motion…*

What is the ultimate essence of information and the reality depicted with it? The existence of points of view able to process and map out the Universe with information. A sentient universe in which information is constantly focused on what Descartes called minds, Aristotle, unmoved Gods, Leibniz, Monads, *is an a priori category, which no scientist can renounce to if he wants to describe not only the external how but also the internal why of all systems of reality. *

This much wider vision of time and the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Hegel, the last serious formulation of the Spatial entropy x Temporal information=Space-time arrows Fractal Generator (thesis-antithesis=Synthesis)

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

Philosophy of science is the summit of scientific disciplines, which attempts to answer with scientific data the big questions about reality and existence, which were in the past the themes of religion and philosophy.

The first simplex vision of philosophy of science appeared with physics of motion and defined the Universe as a game of locomotions, performed by machine-like entities, programmed to move. It was a simple image of reality that suits science for 3 centuries; but with the development of biology and evolution theory first, history and economics and finally theory of information, systems sciences and cybernetics, the model became too simple.

So in the XX century, general systems sciences tried to enlarge the philosophy of the Universe, introducing a new paradigm, organicism. At Macy’s congress at the death of Einstein, Information theorists argued that to construct all systems, entropy, energy, locomotion as the meaning of time was not enough. Information had to be added to explain the arrow of life of increasing form, in-form-ation, the arrow of technology, and the arrow of history.

In all those sciences information increased with time, making systems more complex, evolving them from a simplex machine, into a complex organism – even metal, the complex atoms of what machines were made, were learning to handle information and evolving machines into organisms. So a new model of philosophy of science appeared, and the task of general systems sciences was to formalize it widening our definitions of time and information.

* It is important from the beginning, given the confusion of conceptual meaning of classic science, and the necessary variations and ‘errors’ of ‘naming’ along any book of classic science and those texts, often dragged by them to differentiate the 3 ‘fundamental concepts of quantitative science’ and the 3 topologies in space and time and the minimal **symbols of ¬æ logic we shall use to study 5D equations:*

- |-Entropy, < symbol, is related to expansive motions in space, which decrease information, create pure space without form and are related to lineal motions, limbs and fields.
- O-Information, > symbol, is related to the frequency and closed form o time cycles, which carry is information, creating a flow of pure time passing, related to spherical logic particles and heads.
- Ø-ExI, SxT ≈ present body waves are related to hyperbolic topologies and combinations of entropy and information. We relate it to ‘ENERGY’, as it is in human science a concept used as a ‘bag’ receptacle for it all. Energy ultimately is an entropic motion, which however participates of pure cyclical motion, as it has an ‘angled trajectory’, and can be stored in cyclical forms.

So in general with all the exceptions due to the lack of rigor and understanding of classic science, we can talk of entropy (S), as pure space, Ti, Temporal information, and its combination, put on the bag of present energy, which performs ‘actual work’, by combining motion and direction, of which locomotion energy, studied by physics ads a timeline direction (vector direction) to a motion-speed-force-entropy thrust.

We thus have all the seemingly key elements to construct reality. Cyclical space-time beings, with body-waves that move on a field of energy a head that processes information, and acts-reacts in the external Universe maximising the survival of the being through a series of actions that exchange energy and information with the external world.

We shall use for the concept of the mind many similar symbols such as:

- *•º, for fractal points in open absorption of energy (as stars) and black hole state of pure absobtion of energy • and steady states of balance º;
- œ & @, as systems made of 2 and 3 parts, an information o-head and an energetic, e-body-wave (œ) or as a 3-part, @, membrane, center and body cycles between both; whose center is the ‘origin of the ‘@ctions of the system.
- So we also use for actions, @ or å, showing in both symbols that actions are controlled by an ºhead-particle p.o.v.

I confess i use one or other depending on my mood, as I feel sometimes finitesimal ∆•st (dust) (infinity does not exist beyond the boundaries of one’s perception) and sometimes the whole Universe ∆ûst, synoptic in my mind.

Let us then move to the 3rd element of our equation of all systems of reality, the most fascinating of them, the mind that ‘survives’, by guiding the whole system and its 3 parts through the ‘program of survival of the Universe’ as it absorbs energy and information for head and body, perceiving and moving with it.

All in all is obvious that all form of knowledge is encased by a mind that perceives across different space-time discontinuum selecting certain information of the sea of ‘cyclical space-times actions and forms’ available to perception. So we need to introduce the 4th element of reality, the…’point of view’, •

But those actions happens in social scales (social evolution) and as exchanges of entropy and information with larger and smaller ∆±3 planes, so they cannot be defined without the help of an external analysis of the flows of communications of the singularity with tis world in present space-time and its lower and upper planes of being. Hence we study the social scalar isomorphisms to establish the external domain of the actions of the being.

# ∆§ ISOMORPHISMS : §, Ξ

## 9. 10 through social §cales and Stientific Planes…

**9th isomorphism: social classes**

To maximize your existential force, Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ: ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ, systems gather in social groups.

This is the ultimate ‘equation’ of existential algebra that explains why all systems in the Universe form social groups. But to do so they need a language of social communication… So they also evolve its spatial, temporal and scalar hierarchical languages.

**Symbology. The 3+i language ages**

We will use 3 different symbols for those social groups according to their languages, which have different characteristics:

**∏** will be used for** S1,2,3 societies** of genetic origin between 1 and 1000 ‘p.o,’vs. Since ∏ symbol of multiplication and pi, with its 3 cyclical or hierarchical (height-informative dimensional point of view) elements fits the **G**enetic, **G**enerational view of this first type of Languages. If letters are used obviously the **G** is the appropriate for the case. But as usual we prefer geometric and topological symbols. As a multiplicative element pi also suits the ‘connection network’ established in temporal relationships.

Since the number of ‘connections’ or axons of a ‘temporal structure’ is the square of elements. Thus if there is a society across ‘3 generations of time’ – the elder generation, the father and sons, *all the elements do have connections with the rest of the elements and with himself. And so in a family of 10 there are 100 connections*. Temporal societies are thus as all structures in time hierarchical but with a limited size, since the number of connections a man can establish with others is limited. It has been calculated in fact to reach only 150 ‘meaningful connections’.

This means that the ∏o=individual, ∏1=10¹ family, ∏-2=10² Clan are perfectly connected and have been found in all systems to work smoothly in synchronicity, but the 3rd element, the tribe, ∏³=1000 is not perfectly connected – not all the individuals know all the members of the tribe (as usual in the ternary waves, which are ‘riding’ on each other, that is the previous wave is loosely connected with the next wave in space, age in time, or scale/plane in the 5th dimension).

Thus ∏3, the tribe, is a mixed organization, in *which only the upper caste, the 10% of informative elders know each other and are properly connected. It is therefore also the natural phase towards a Social Class evolution of a system, in which the upper class is totally connected, the middle class is loosely connected and the lower class or ‘energy of the system’ is NOT connected. *

**∑** is a symbol for serial sum. We have chosen it, for the 2nd social age of the system, where geography defines the connections, which overrides the genetic, temporal connections which exist still at its base. So the central point of view of the geography or ‘capital’ appears at this point in the region of maximal communication (geometric center or coastal, external membrane point of maximal in taking of energy and information).

It implies that the system has entered into a common vital space, *besides the genetic language of organization, creating more complex topological structure and starting an organization of the 3 social networks needed to form an organism. Geographical, spatial systems, such as cities, stars clusters, or biological tissues have such structure.*

*The basic action at this stage, is given by the natural symmetries of those 3 ‘scalar languages’ and the ‘3 ages of time. So the system expands spatially to control energy.*

Œ, is the symbol for the organic, final creative scales of the system, when the whole is formed.

Then the existence of 3 growing spatial networks of energy, reproduction and information or capital of the system, surrounded by a border which conform the organic structure, almost emerging as a whole). At this stage the language is informative*.*

Thus the Organic Age, is the symbol for the most complex linguistic, topological 3-system unions, in which there is often genetic, spatial languages and a new faster language of information that dominates the system. The language is on top and the informative class has come to dominate the energy and reproductive class, body and limbs. The language further on is ‘removed’ from the spatial geography of the system which becomes secondary, the organism thus is formed. The second symbol of co-product is also a graphic symbol, as the center has been formed by the intersection of the membrane’s flows of energy and information that converge through the intermediate toroid topology into the center.

*∆+1: the Universal ages.*

U or ∆, if symbols are preferred are the symbol for the Universal age.

Finally the being is formed, but it continues its growth, now as a “universal whole” from its birth as a micro-organism, through its evolution into a super organism and macro-organism. And we classify them by the Spatial dimensions, that is the number of cells, the system has (though they can also be studied by its evolutionary ages in time), into:

∆+1: From 1000 up to a Billion cells or micro-organism.

∆+1: From a billion to a trillion or super-organism

∆+1: From a quadrillion to a quintillion and beyond… Macro-organism.

While the range of cells do change and indeed, there are exceptional being which have already all the organic specialization just with a minimal number of 100 cells (rotifera in life), and there are macro-organisms with decillion cells (atomic structures), we average the most common cases, in life, and galaxies, which are after all the fundamental ‘two type of organisms of the Universe’ (life/human scales and galaxies, which are atoms of the higher scale with stars being ‘photonic, fractal points of the electron’.

Thus U for universals if the last symbol were easily available is the symbol for the linguistic, Universal age, in which the system starts to ’emerge’ as a whole in a clear, differentiated manner.

Thus ∏, ∑, Œ and U represent the symbols of social growth and language, for the Genetic, temporal; geographic, Spatial and Universal, Organic Scales of the system, the ‘9th and U, for Society or Universal will be used to express the Social Scales that transform individuals into Universals.

While S or § is the obvious symbol for social scales that finally emerged as a new Univessal Plane:

S¹º individuals = Universal ∆+1 = ∆+1 Plane of Space-time.

**Some examples in different ∆-planes of the social process of evolution of individuals into ∆+1 Universals.**

Thus the final, more complex action of any being is:

*∏, ∑, Œ=∆+1*

The social evolution of individuals into Universals, the system across a series of social scales till reaching the limit of its environment in simpler ‘herd like organization’, or the complexity of a tightly packed super-organism.

Each of them however can be further divided into ‘Social scales’, as the individual groups itself into larger social entities, starting by the ‘couple’ and the ‘family’.

So we can write them as a 10¹º series, *in which the fundamental element of aggregation will be the ‘type’ of language of information used to unify the units, which must grow in ‘time speed’ according to the metric of the 5th dimension as we enlarge the system, so to maintain its synchronicity. So in the paradigm used to name those scales (human societies) we find the 3 first genetic scales, then 3 geographical, economic scales, and finally 3 verbal, ideological scales to get to the global super organism:*

- 10º, the individual of a given ‘previously described ∆-scale of the whole Universe…
- through the 10¹ scale of the family (which can be a couple, a mononuclear family or most often one through 3 generations of grand-parents, parents and sons, of around 10 people) and then in genetic units, to the…
- 10² scale of ‘clans’… and 10³ scales or tribes (in the human system, which is taken here for the first ‘names’ of those scales…
- Changing to a more complex language of social information, geographical, economical systems that create the next degree of 3 scales, the town, 10 up to 4, the city, 10 up to 5 and the nation, 10 up to 6…
- And then to ideological, verbal systems, which create cultures, till arriving to the – 1 billion, 10¹º-¹³ individuals, which normally emerges as a unit of the next scale.

In the next graph we can see the case of mechanical societies, the economic system or world stock, which contrary to belief is not a human organism but joined by ‘chips’, and has already reached the ‘mark’ needed for ’emerging’ as a global mind, the internet:

We also consider the human super organism of history, a smaller super organism of human beings, not yet emerged as a global single being, but coming closer to the 10¹º human beings, in the global super organism:

# 10th isomorphisms≈ ∆±4. Fractal scales & Exi≈stential Åctions

The next grouping of isomorphic sets of laws, derived from the symmetries of scalar space-time concerns the symmetries of scales. 3 are the fundamental themes of a study of systems in ∆-scales: the co-existence of a superorganism in 3 scales, studied in the first ‘isomorphisms’, when considering its spatial and temporal symmetric organisation through 3 organic topologies and 3 ages of time.

So all systems have a self-centred mind, or relative ∆0 point of view, which will relate as follows to the different scales in which they perform its ‘fractal actions’ its program of existence:

- THEY WILL REPRODUCE THROUGH ∆-1 cells
- They will feed on ∆-2 energy
- they will perceive ∆-3 bit of information
- And they move across an invisible ∆-4 space.

And yet at the same time they will as ∆0 beings become related to ∆+ systems where they will perform an asymmetric function to the larger whole:

- they will be -1 cells of its species,
- they will be -2 informative species of its solar ecosystem
- they will be -3 dust of stars, energy of the galaxy.
- Invisible,-4 beyond their Halo to the cosmic whole.

It is then through the connection we establish by our fractal actions (in as much as they influence other scales of reality) how the game of existence transfers energy and information across scales in an asymptotic way.And we study this in the 4th and 5th isomorphism, considering the ±4 planes in which an ∆o mind develops its will of exi=stience; through 5 actions (one of them reflexive at the ∆o level) as master of its own universe, but also in the negative sphere, being used for the 4 above actions of the being as dust of a higher ∆+ space-time.

**The program of the Universe. ****Œ: Mental species: ∞ knots of space-time cycles or ‘minds’, acting, living…**

Now we must wonder, about the Monads, or points of view in the Universe, Why they perform space-time cycles? Why they move at all? Why we need them, why they move and make space-time actions, accumulated into world cycles, which then accumulate into social planes of the 5th dimension?

B*ecause only by performing those cycles they survive. The *program of the Universe, the will of existence of those points happen because without a system absorbing energetic motion, its motions become spent and they die. But to absorb energy they must map out reality and see that energy, so they must gauge information.

So ultimately the answer of why things exist is simply this: they exist and perform space-time cycles because to do space-time cycles ensures their survival. if they don’t they would disappear. It is not a tautology as it would seem but rather a necessity. Existence is seen by performing timespace cycles. When we don’t perform them we become extinct.

And even when they do so, there are errors and others will throw them an entropy tantrum, disorder them and absorb their energy when they die. SO they must reproduce, iterate, repeat for their form to survive.

So all systems do observe, ∆o, change their motions, accelerating ∆a, to a field of energy to feed, ∆e, and iterate, ∆i. And this are the 4 actions coded by quantum numbers, genetic letters, drive of existence, you name it. We shall find them in all systems. And finally, when they gather socially into wholes, they become stronger, and so parts become Universals, ∆u, and this is the 5th dimensional action, which NOT being internal does NOT have a ‘code number, letter’ but DOES HAPPEN as wholes survive better, multicellular systems survive better, bosons survive better, nations win over tribes, and herds over individuals.

What all those knots that web cycles of space-time, gauging them, into fixed, still mind mappings of the Universe do? SURVIVE.

As it happens, all of them, gauge information first, ∆o, so we call quantum theories gauging theories. Then all absorb energy to move. And alas! when they have enough energy, even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons decouple, reproducing other quarks and electrons. Finally they communicate energy and information with other similar beings, organizing bigger wholes through networks.

So all systems do seem to have what human anthropomorphic beings consider the properties of life and intelligence, restricted of course to humans and similar forms of life: gauging information from an observer’s point of view (right graph), ∆o, feeding on energy to move, accelerate and decelerate (∆e, ∆a), communicating information and iterating with that information its form, ∆i, and further on evolving parts into wholes, called in philosophy Universals, ∆u.

So we shall use those 4+U actions, (∆a,e,i,o,u), to explain all systems of the Universe and translate its physical, biological and social laws. I.e.

we shall find that the 4 quantum letters code for the actions of atoms, the 4 genetic letters for the actions of cells, the 4 drives of existence for the actions of animal life.

And this, vital action system is ultimately the cause of it all. Indeed, we get old because our nervous system absorbs too much energy of the body, as information, and Tƒ-particles dominate the system. We cold be immortal if we weren’t so interested in information. *The order of the life worldcycle of system is the integral product of all the small a,ei,o,u actions they perform. All is synchronized through those elements.*

So we can conclude this first description of the program of the Universe which all beings that want to ‘last in existence’ follow, as they apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or consciously, with the different mind-languages and its ternary grammars, with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that code particles’ behavior, allowing them to obey in terms of the actions of space-time the program of ‘existence’ and its space-time actions:

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masses, û, with memes as opposed to physical systems that use quantum numbers and geometric mappings. Yet all ofthem express the laws of survival and its game of survival, social actions as genes also do, which evolve atoms and molecules and humans from individuals into *superorganisms**, according to the laws *studied in the first and 3rd line – the common game that makes emerge through 4^{th} postulate of ¬æ networks a whole, indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.

The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species.

So T.Œ can explain this perspectives and plug them all within the general game of existence and evolution from parts into wholes (5^{th} more complex set of reproductive and social actions, ∑œ=û+1

And once we do understand the isomorphisms of the Universe we can plug into them all the systems of reality and enter into the details of the thoughts of god.

Those ARE the ultimate forms and events of reality, of which we hardly think, because they act in words of Kant, as the ‘a priori categories’ of the mind. They are also the main windows our minds have to peer in the absolute. And its explanation in a rational way become therefore the fundamental elements of any Theory of Everything, as all what exists does so in space and time, as a system of energy and information, which is born, evolves and becomes extinct, regardless of how we classify it, either as a Physical, biological, Social or Mental System – the 4 categories humans use to explain all realities.

So I was ready to found a T.Œ based in those 3×3+0 principles: fractal space, and its symmetry with time motions, the 5^{th} dimension of scales, each one with different species and different time clocks (studied by a different science), and the 5 actions that the ‘fractal points of view’ of the Universe, which hold in their non-Euclidean geometry a world in itself follow mechanically, vegetatively or consciously in order to survive, as they need to absorb and emit energy and information for their body and brains, ∆±e, i:

∂æ, ∂e, ∂ï, ∂œ, and further on evolve and synchronize its time cycles to become larger systems, wholes of the 5^{th} dimension stronger than their parts, fitter to survive by the power of eusocial evolution by the power of love, which is the mystical expression of the 5^{th} dimension, the arrow of future of all systems, as wholes come after parts – the ultimate meaning of the Universe.

**The function of existence of the Universe.**

It follows that in detailed descriptions we can use existential calculus to find the function of existence or world cycle of a supeorganism, which in existential algebra extends the concept of groups and other algebraic structures to describe the structure of a supeorganism.

*THE SUPERORGANISM BECOMES THEREFORE THE FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA AND ITS STUDY THE BASIS OF :*

**¬ ÆLGEBRA***. *

We can express in many formal ways the function of existence or sum of the actions o space, time, ∆±exi of the supeorganism. Its sum will always be a zero sum in terms of the finished world cycles, its combinations of this ‘fate’, which is implicit in the ∞ of the Universe, always a bigger whole than the set a limited perceptive point of view can study. So we can write a formula for any relative world-universe studied by a point of view and its existential or generator function, developed in time.

And all this could be embodied in a simple generator equation of space-time 5D fractal systems:

U = ∞ [∆-1: ∑Sp ≤≥∆: ≈ E x T ≤≥ ∆+1:∏ Tƒ] = 0 (mind-knowledge mapping) : 0 x ∞ = Constant world cycle zero sum of a still super organism in its point of balance fluctuating between past and future as a lanwave of existence which will return to its zero point.

For each fractal system of the Universe made of a mass of cellular, ∆-1 micro-particles, loosely connected, ∑, into herds, which shared energy < and information > with a body ST.

**Å: a,e,ï,œ, û. The cyclical Åctions of all space-time**** systems, across its 5Dimensional planes of existence.**

– We absorb energy for our system, ∆Sp, we absorb and process information, ∆ï, we iterate our systems, ∆œ, we socialize in Universal groups, ∆U, and we move around to do so, ∆V. And as it happens, we do all that by interacting between our ∆-scale and other scales of reality:

We move through ∆-4 gravitational forces, we perceive light and electronic quanta to inform ourselves, ∆-3, we absorb ∆-2 energy quanta (amino acids) to recompose our bodies, we reproduce through ∆-1 seminal seeds, and we socialize with individuals like us. And that is why all fits nicely.

All what humans and everything else do are varieties of those 5 åctions. So write this 5th isomorphism with another simple equation:

- ∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1

Now actions happen between planes of existence. So they are all related to the scales of the 5th dimension where the being absorbs and emits its energy and information. All those scales do participate in most of the Actions the entity performs in reality. Actions are also related to the whole world cycle of the being, which can be considered the integral or closed energy-information cycle of the being, sum of all its ±actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, which become at the end of the existential cycle a zero sum.

For example, all species are born as fast-evolving seminal seeds in the ∆-1 cellular or atomic scale (baby black holes of maximal attractive power, seminal organisms) which devour energy and information from the environment or the mother’s womb so fast that they soon become a mature, larger organism emerging in the relative human ∆-scale as babies, or feeding on a planet or star in a Nova explosion that gives birth to an adult black hole.

And this is the aforementioned 3rd isomorphism of the Ages of time, that explains the life-death world cycle. Since beings ARE made of ‘clock-cycles of time’ that last a finite duration, which is their world cycle or life-death cycle (no longer a world line as in 4D models, since the ‘new dimension of scalar information’ bends those lines up and down in the life cycle that starts and ends in the ∆-1 seminal atomic scale where systems are born and return dissolved after a big-bang death).

And so we define the life-death world cycle as a travel through 3 ∆-planes of the 5th dimension- the cellular/atomic, human/organic and social/cosmic planes ‘of existence’.

And so we have a better version of this isomorphism, *the Generator, Fractal Equation of the Universe, which resumes the 4 åctions of existence, from where all varieties of reality are born:*

**Ψ.** U=∞∑Se∆-1≤i≥∏Tƒ∆+1 or written in the simplest form: Sp∆-1*Tƒ.*

Where Sp is the letter for energy, i for iteration, 0±1 for social evolution and T for temporal information, the 4 åctions that truly ‘move’ the Universe.

As scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions that represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons:

4 Maxwell equations describe all the actions of an electric field:

If we consider the electromagnetic current described by those equations, an ∆+1 upper scale society of the electron field, then we can consider the first law, the definition of electrostatics, electric charges that can ad on to create a field and electromagnetic waves between them:

Se (electric field) < ST-electromagnetic wave > Tƒ-charge

Those particles however are the only infinitesimals to be taken into account here. There are no infinitesimals of magnetic fields? Why, simply speaking because magnetic fields are an effect of relativity (4D metric) or from 5D perspective, the connecting field that exchanges energy and information, ±∆e,i, with the cosmic, gravitational field above the system, and hence the field which evolves socially electric charges into larger simultaneous, fixed spatial ordered whole configurations.

The other two equations thus relate this process by which electric fields ‘generate’ an upper ‘crust’ or magnetic field which in turn will generate a mass field, which will be the upper foremost emergent process that bring us from electronic charges, into the emergence of electric motions to the emergence of gravitomagnetic fields – via Heaviside unification equations.

4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons – its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number. 4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule (∆e:stretching, ∆i:bending, ∆a:translating and ∆∑œ:bonding=û)

*In the graph the simplex, ±e, ±ï motions of molecules, related to the 4 quantum numbers of its atoms.*

4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:

And 4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.

Alas! That is what the ‘4’ numbers *code that is the cracking ‘number’ of creation.*

The theme of the actions of space-time of a system and its organic nature is a complex, extensive element of T.Œ. In essence, the 6 forms of motion are ‘organic’, as we have shown in the study of motion as reproduction of form. They are therefore the isomorphism that fusions in detail all the elements of each fractal being, which performs to survive its space-time motions as actions of existence.

Now let us consider the simplest one, the one physicists so much love to study and think is the meaning of it all, that lowly ∆-4 accelerated motions, forces and speeds, V=S/t (incidentally also a ratio between space and time, it couldn’t be otherwise).

Without locomotions you have left 4 clearly organic motions in space-time or åctions, energy, information, social evolution and iteration/reproduction. We shall then demonstrate that motion in space is also a form of reproduction, hence all in the Universe is an organic iterative fractal.

**∆±1 superorganisms of scalar space-time & its social planes.**

The fractal generator generates the space-time beings of the Universe. And so we affirm that:

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of quanta of space and time cycles:

*The Unification of all the scales of the Universe under the same laws and parameters is the purpose of stience, both in the organic paradigm and the abstract, simpler versions of mathematical physics, which seeks for a Unification Equation of the 2 ‘limiting’ scales and forces of nature, Macroscopic, Cosmological gravitation and microscopic, quantum electromagnetism. We achieve both in this web studying the metric equations of those scales of space-time. Indeed, the key to complete those tasks is the Understanding of the fractal structure of space-time and its self-similarity, a concept different from equality. To that aim we need to formalise, what we shall call generically the 5th dimension of scalar space-time, whose metric equation relates all those scales of reality, co-invariant to changes of time speed and spatial size, such as bigger systems in space turn slower its time clocks, hence carry less information in the form and frequency of those cycles; while larger systems, extend in bigger spaces and can control those smaller parts and harmonise them.*

*In the graph you can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, the gravitational scale of big galaxies. The thermodynamic scales of human beings, the electromagnetic scale of quantum atoms. *

*On the left side the fundamental equations of each scale, its ‘Energy equations’, which describe a sum of lineal and angular quanta of space and time:*

* E=Sp (h-planck) x T(frequency) for the quantum scale.*

*E= nK (Sp: spatial entropy) x Tƒ (Temperature vibrational clocks) for the thermodynamic scale. *

*Finally, E=1/2 m (clock-vortex of mass) x c² (constant of space). *

*Are those all the scales of the physical fractal?*

We do not know empirically as our perception is limited by our ∆o point of view. So beyond galaxies and within atoms, there is a possible 4th dark world of energy and gravitational information beyond our limits of space quanta (c-speed) and time cycles (0° k), which we can hint in black holes and intergalactic, expanding space.

The only clear proof we have that this scales might be infinite is the following:

When we consider mass as a vortex of time, we can unify according to scale and 5D metric, atoms and galaxies, as systems of masses and charges of the two scales. Thus an atom is a galaxy and in such a case; the Universe is infinite.

Another proof is what happens to accelerated mass ‘clocks’, when they reach light speed, in E=mc²

Suddenly mass increases its ‘frequency=density’ while ‘c’, the quanta of space-lineal motion becomes a limit… and then we emerge into the next scale, and mass ‘explodes into radiation’.

So somehow *we start afresh the game connecting the ‘minimalist quanta scale: E=hv’, and the upper cosmological scale ‘E=mc2’, as Mass the clock of time of the gravitational scale becomes the ‘frequency clock of the new scale’, converted into lineal ‘dark energy radiation’ (fourth screen on the graph): E=hv = mc2; m=h/c2 v.*

And so the game starts again; being the key difference between both scales, NOT the ‘time form=frequency’, which emerges ‘intact’ (we shall see how that is one of the miracles of information as in resonance effects, where a microscopic being can *by touching a macroscopic one transfer form, information through resonance: information travels with no entropy between scales upwards). But entropic space and its related energy changes.*

Here when we move from the smallish worlds we can conceive (h) into the largest ones (dark intergalactic world), we move from h to h/c2.

Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

*Yet when we order them by size, we find a co-invariant property, which is the canonical definition of the metric of a space-time Dimension (Klein): *

*Tƒ (Time frequencies) x Sp (Spatial size) = ST (constant plane of spacetime) .*

*The co-invariance of the speed of time clocks of Nature and its space-quanta ‘size’, is the fundamental law that order the different planes of existence of reality, which has an obvious fractal, organic, social nature.*

This co-invariance is precisely what allows those fractal properties to exist, as it allows the synchronicities between parts and wholes, which is the ultimate meaning of a fractal: the parts are self-similar to the wholes, because the parts can grow into the wholes through those co-invariances. We thus talk of a fractal dimension in the Universe, the dimension that departing from parts, creates a whole. And this quantitative, mathematical description of fractals is what has been carried about by scientists since Mandelbrot published his seminal book on fractals, from the mathematical perspective in the 1970s.

Yet what was not developed then, and I took as a task in the 90s, was to develop the whys, the philosophy of science behind the fractal paradigm.

Now, it is clear that your quanta making time cycles interact in the ∆-1 cellular scale, the ∆-organic scale and the ∆+1 social scale. But so happens with physical systems, which extend through 3 scales, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale. So Space is a sum, ∑ of quanta, **∑Spe**, Time is a series of ‘pi cycles’ with different speeds, **∏Tiƒ**, synchronised to work symbiotically together. And both space quanta and time cycles, are ordered in relative scales of Spatial size, and Temporal frequency**. **And this happens through at least 3 relative scales of size and speed of time,** ∆±1.**

When you get sick, your cells are normally infected, and your cycles in the larger social world are reduced. You are, as every thing else in the Universe a ‘super-organism’ (meaning you extend through symbiotic scales, each one made of smaller quanta), of fractal space and cyclical time.

Now to understand how ‘fractal systems are organised’, we should start by defining ‘fractal systems’ in physical species, which are always composed of the 2 elements of all realities, fractal space and cyclical time…

We then consider that all systems are fractals of space and time, ∆ST and call this series of scales, ∆, of different size and speed of time clocks of the Universe, the fifth dimension. Since a dimension is precisely a system of space-time points extended across reality. In the next image we can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, with man on its relative centre, as we perceive from our scale, which we shall call ∆o.

**A human being described with the fractal generator.**

Now, the fractal generator in space and time Sp≈PsTƒ≈Ft, can easily as we have seen describe physical systems and its conserved quantities of space and time and its integration in closed paths or worldcycles of energy.

Can we do the same with biological organisms. Yes we can. Since when we substitute by the specific time motion or space dimensional organ of a being, we obtain a certain species of the Universe. So in the next graph we see the case for a human being:

*The two new fields opened by complex sciences: Understanding the social, scalar nature of species and its time-death cycles:*

The expansion of knowledge achieved by complex sciences with a logic and mathematical formalism to explain the structure of all systems opens two new ‘avenues’ of knowledge, as it adds to simplex models of ‘spatial dimensions and time motions (the 4 dimensions of classic physics) the ‘slow’ cycles of evolution of time from past to future, and the ‘growing organization’ of systems across different scales of size, from atomic to galactic, cellular to social scales.

Those ‘dimensions of time’ and causality, and scales of space, of course, were known to science. We all know that things are born grow evolve reproduce and die. And we all knew that the Universe had scales of size from strings to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond.

But unlike the formalism of spatial dimensions acquired by physicists through Galileo’s and Einstein’s relativity equations (v=s/t, etc.), till the creation of a mathematical formalism or ‘metrics’ for the scales of social organization of the Universe, we lacked a concept of an ‘arrow of complexity’, of growth of information in the future, which defined both the ‘architectural structure’ of the Universe in organic social scales and the ‘life-death cycle’ performed by all its entities as ‘we travel through the scalar dimensions of size’ in our life-death existences.

Thus Complex sciences is adding two dimensions of logic, causal time, the past with lesser organization (i-1, energy ages) and the future with maximal organization (i+1 scales and 3rd informative age); with the middle steady-state age of balance, the adult age when motions were repeated in a ‘duration or frequency, T=1/ƒ, that created a repetitive present,s ready state.

But now we knew also about the arrow of evolution in time, of increasing information and complexity across those 3 ages for all species, and it had revealed, an entire new ‘set’ of dimensions, the scalar, social dimensions from microcosms to macrocosms

– This social i±n dimensions, grouped in 3 cellular-individual and social scales were the key to explain the deepest questions of the Universe. How the future was organized through social evolution – why social scales existed, from Gods, the subconscious collective of civilizations, to legal nations, from galaxies, with its cellular stars to multicellular organisms. And obviously those ‘dimensions’ were the key to study social sciences.

And the, there were the combined analysis of how an organism evolved in life and death through those scales, and how it could manage to stay in an immortal steady state of eternal adulthood.

So the perfect life of the individual and the perfect world of mankind could be managed according to the laws actions and behaviours that maximized the ‘existence’ in the middle steady state, which was also the state of maximal connection and action of a being, as it was in contact with its social I-whole, having an active role in the whole organism.

Why then humans do NOT construct a perfect world, with the laws of social super organisms, and halt the evolution of lethal machines that compete with man in labor and war fields and are displacing us from the eco(gnomic)system?

Why humans did not construct a perfect world which was eternal in time and space?

The answer was double theoretical and practical.

Theoretically it was obvious: Because they didn’t have a true science of economics and history, of the economic and political, re=productive and informative, ‘neuronal’ networks of their social organism. And so there was NOT a science of politics, the science of guiding, curing and directing, the physiology of History – the Human super organism – akin to the work of a doctor in the ‘inferior’ i-ndividual human scale.

And they did not have either any idea of what was the life-death cycle of all systems, its laws of evolution, extinction, birth and death.

They were dumber than the dumbest atom which performs with excellence all its motions and phases, and is able to keep immortal by limiting the lethal actions of it organisms.

And so I thought human social scientists could act as ‘bio-historians’ , as doctors of history,and design and regulate any system of reality by understanding its laws, parts, wholes, energy-information exchanges, and in the case of economics (the reproductive network of a civilization) and politics (its informative network) and ecology (its geographic, energy territory), we could create a social science that would understand the hows, the whys and the modes of change of our social reality to manage society and create a perfect world – if we could enlighten our politicos and economists, bankers and military and make them learn a true science of history, and make them abandon the ‘anti quantum paradox’ that confuses ‘power’ with ‘science’, selfish i-agendas with the duty of any i-ndividual part of a neuronal network of information that control a society – which is to serve the cells of the body.

Now the reader will probably be more interested in the i-ndividual ‘ego’, which is its ‘center’ as a human being. And yet in history the function maximized is the ‘world cycle or ‘function of existence’ of all human beings, maximized by the sum of all the cells of mankind: ∑ Max. E x I (e=i).

This goal – to reach the perfect stability of the adulthood or steady state of a system, is thus the goal of History, achieved by the maximization of the life of all its members – not as the present ‘capitalist’ system pretends, by the maximization of the existence of corporations and machines – and as a fringe benefit of the 1% of ‘leisure classes’ (Veblen) that owns those corporations.

So we will refer all our knowledge to that aim.

Let us then deal now with the ‘social scalar dimensions’ of the super organism of history first, departing from the general laws of all super organisms.

Then we will deal with other ‘great advance’ of complex sciences – the life-death cycle, its morphologies ages of evolution and extinction, applied to HISTORY AS IT IS, not as an ideal immortal history, would make it.

The morphology of the Universe – its ternary organs and social classes.

We talked in terms of ‘networks’, that is ‘functions’ of the existence in all super organisms of an informative network, an energetic and a reproductive network (nervous/political, digestive/gaia, blood/economic networks in the i and i+1 human scales).

But are all the network elements of an organism equal? Or there are ‘social classes’, differentiated organs and cells by their belonging to each of those networks? Obviously this is the case in individual organisms and it is also the case in social ones. So we need to learn the ‘rules’ of differentiation and how to ‘recognize’ the social classes and functions and parts of organisms, which also are the varieties of human social castes and machines…

All systems had a ternary structure made of informative neurons/particles, energetic limbs/fields and reproductive bodies/waves, which worked together for their common good. Those ‘upper’ informative classes, ‘reproductive, working classes’ and ‘energetic mechanisms and fields’, were NEVER in open opposition as the ideology of marxism had it, nor $elected by God, and without responsibility for each other, as capitalism pretended (latter studied in more detail).

But to fully gras the ‘ternary structure’ of organisms in symbiotic social classes, we have to introduce concepts of topology and symmetry, between the 3 elements/networks of all organisms.

The next graph shows the general case of all ‘complementary systems’, which in fact are ‘super-organisms’, made of cells, which are also complementary systems, in a scalar fractal Universe in which all its made to the image and likeness of the whole:

In the graph all what exists is a complementary system of networks of energy (bodies/fields/working classes) and information (heads/particles/informative classes), which balance each other, sharing energy and information among them, to reproduce similar systems in other regions of space-time.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity in balance, which can decouple=reproduce creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

In history priests and politicians issue ethic laws to direct a mass of citizens.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Any social organism is ruled by those who ‘invent’ the language of social power first, and then those who ‘talk it’ and give orders with it.

So the people who invent laws and talk words on one side and the people who invent money and ‘talk price’ on the other decide the future of the world, and of history – the theme of this blog.

The result is a dual class structure into a neuronal/informative system or ‘class’ that controls with the language of information (nervous, legal order in biologic historic organisms) the blind body of cells that work for them (middle, ‘sheeple’ class in human societies, body organs), to whom it delivers enough energy – ‘blood/money’ – so they can perform their tasks.

This ternary structure cannot be modified if we want an efficient organism, but at the same time, it implies that the ‘head’ obeys the wantings of the body, is responsible for the correct information, and so latter we will see how ‘a proper democracy’ in which the head is controlled by judges/pain messages, and the body receives enough oxygen to survive/money can make more efficient human social super organism.s

Now we shall introduce the more complex concept we will use in those texts, regarding the existence in all systems of ‘informative heads’ and energetic limbs and reproductive bodies, imposed by the dimensional space-time duality of the Universe.

**The topologies of 2-manifolds of information.**

Now we are giving a conceptual jump that might change the way you look at the Universe a make you abandon this blog due to its complexity. But we truly require to go a little bit deeper in the structure of the organic complex cosmos, so you understand how we humans interact ‘morphologically’ in terms of ‘form’ and function with machines

In Complex sciences dimensions are that important because you are MADE OF THEM. You are made of energy and time, as when you say i don’t have energy and time to do this. That is what you are a time world life-death cycle that occupies a vital space across a cellular individual and social scale.

So to know about dimensions is to know about yourself- a 10 Dimensional being made of space-time, where space and time are merely two way tow perceive the same either moving or with form.

Vital space moving is energy, cycles of time fixed are forms, forms of in-form-ation.

So all is made of planes of space, moving energy and cycles of time, static information.

How we see it is a paradox of perception: we perceive information in stillness, so the mind creates quiet mappings of reality without motion.

The symmetry between ‘spatial morphologies’, ‘organs’ and ‘time ages’

Let us consider only one of those complex laws of systems across its scales, the law that relates the morphology of the organs of a system with its function in space and evolution in time, as it is the basis of the understanding of economics and its relationship with history:

ENERGY VS INFORMATION

In the graph, information is bidimensional (holographic principle) and so systems have only 3 possible ‘bidimensional’ type of surfaces that define:

– Max. E: ‘energetic, planar, lineal limbs’ in all species (so a weapon and an skeleton are both lineal, as they promote motion.

– Max. I: informative organs, which are ‘spherical’., the form that stores more information.

– Max. E xI: Its body-wave combinations.

We see that simple topological law in humans and machines, which explains their similar functions and the reasons why ‘animetals’ exist, as human functions are enhanced by parallel mechanisms.

And so all systems will be at least made of energetic limbs that move informative heads/particles, which gauge reality, in the dimension of height, where perception is higher thanks to projective geometry.

This meant, as we shall see latter in our analysis of Evolution that systems evolved in height from reptiles that ended becoming birds to galaxies that develop an informative gravitational black hole in its centre, to life that evolved in height to reach man. Thus economics and machines are NOT different from any other science that studies organic systems and MUST be studied and designed with those organic and biological laws. The present absurd ‘theological’, ‘capitalist’, ‘tribal’, nationalist concepts used in those sciences are completely out of reason, and have no meaning for the Unvierse at large, and certainly will not enlighten the future of mankind, as the basis for building efficient, free, complex social systems.

We see a brief visual description of the scales of the 5th dimension, which as it happens, loose information the further we go up and down those scales, *and we shall see observe at the scale of cosmological galaxies and quantum atoms, a very similar reality, opening up the question of each atom being self-similar to a galaxy and the number of scales infinite – a theme of metaphysics, that is the study of the whole fractal generator and its likely ∞ scales (I prefer though the term philosophy of science or T.Œ, theory of the organic everything for metaphysics, which we limit to the speculative thoughts on the beyond).*

Below we observe with a developed fractal equation in terms of space (left side) and time (right side) the Human Superorganism in space with its 3 ‘topological networks’ of informative nervous systems, reproductive, blood systems and energetic, digestive systems. They can be further subdivided into 3 sub-systems, and then pegged to quantic cells of the ∆-1 scale.

And *that simple structure of Sp-Digestive systemTƒ (nervous system) is the synchronous perception of an animal being in space, as a Superorganism across its ∆±1 cellular, individual and social scales. Hence we say that a fractal ternary super organism is the fundamental particle of space.*

And on the right side we see this spatial being across its existence, from its ∆-1 seed scale, reproduced and organised and emerging as a living being that goes through 3 ages, *in which each of those 3 organic networks dominates, the young age of maximal limb-motions and energy feeding, the mature, adult age of reproductive activity and the old age of maximal information and little still motion, which explodes back into entropy in the moment of death, returning the being to the ∆-1 scale.*

And this simple structure in time:

∆-1 (Tƒ seed) ∑∆-Sp young age>ST-adult reproductive age > Ft(future informative age)<<∆-1 death.

It is the fractal generator expressed in time, which can be applied to the ‘world cycle of existence’ of all beings. So we said that the fundamental cycle of time of all beings of the Universe is its life-death existential world cycle.

But this has immense consequences in all sciences. Consider the philosophical, biological one, related to the mind. If we write the metric as the product of the body power or mass (no longer in terms of energy-space) and mind speed of a species

*M (Sp) (mass of the body) x Tƒ ( speed of mental information) = Constant*

And we call this product *the existential force of a system, which remains invariant, for any group of species of the universe*, we obtain in physical species:

- The momentum of a system, which indeed remains constant and determines the power of a physical system when it collides with other, whereas the maximal power is that of a black hole, which indeed devours all other.
- The top predator power of a biological species, which is maximized when it is faster with its brains (mammals, insects) and stronger with its bodies (dinosaurs, sharks).

But further on, we realize that for *any large kind of species, that product must remain constant. So* insects process information 10 times faster and live 10 times slower than men, so their existence is as long as ours, in subjective time.

And this is the basis of *the Absolute Relativity of the Universe: all its species are equally valid, all of them, live similar lives, and the Universe must be infinite in its planes, as there is no limit to the speed of its clocks and shrinking of size, proved by the ‘Poincare’s conjecture’ (a sphere can shrink without limit without deformation, so a mind can map out in an infinitesimal point any infinite Universe it perceives with the non-limit shrinking size of ¥ rays).*

And so can group all the species of the Universe, according to those metric, and define all the ∆-scales and families of related ∆-somorphic Existential Forces as the 5th dimension of space-time:

*5 Dimension = ∑ Se x Tƒ = ∆±4*

__U±∆: Planes of existence.__

Thus, the metric of the 5th dimension, define the laws that allow stable exchanges of energy and information in the Universe, *in any scale of spatial size and temporal speed of the Universe* – each one studying a range of spatial sizes and hence of different speeds of temporal clocks in the Universe:

*The scales of science are grouped according to ∆ST metric by range of size, which also establish an arrow from past to future, as a greater size requires the social organization of its parts that must have ‘taken place in the past’. Thus social evolution of parts into wholes is the arrow of relative future of the Universe.*

Now each science studies a ‘scale’ of size, roughly. And so we define the 9 scales and its sciences, all of them following the same isomorphisms as:

- Forces and its quanta studied by quantum physics
- Atoms study by physics and chemistry,

3 molecules studied by chemistry

- States of Matter and Cells studied by Physics, Chemistry and biology
- Organisms and Geological formations, studied by Geology and Biology
- Planets and Human civilizations today global, studied by Geology and Social Stiences
- Stars, studied by astrophysics
- Galaxies, studied by Astronomy
- Universe, studied by Cosmology
- The entire Cosmos, including the parts we do not see, studied by metaphysics, philosophy of science and Cosmology.

And so we write the simplest of all equations for this isomorphism:

- ∑∆=10∆-1

The study of those 9+∆=10 scales, thus would be the 10th and last isomorphism. Both in the analysis of each scale with the same laws, and the analysis of the question ‘do those scales repeat, since we can model the force-particles-atom system and the force-stars-galaxy system with similar laws?

Indeed, the species and systems of all those Scalar Planes of Space-time obey the same set of mathematical and logic laws ruled by the metric of the 5th Dimension that describe its Spatial Energy and Temporal Information. Reason why we say they are isomorphic planes of space-time, ‘∆ST’. And call each of those sets of laws an Isomorphism.

So what are the other isomorphisms of reality due to the ∆-scalar planes of space-time?

Let us run them now backwards from the 10th down. I’m sorry I have been studying them for so long it bores me to be orderly writing again about it (-: But we use a nice mnemonic rule to learn them: the numbers are always related to the ‘numbers’ of varieties of the isomorphism.

So, ‘Existence’ is the 1st, the ‘whole’, the one, the i, the most important; 2 was the isomorphism of bidimensional manifold varieties; 3 of the 3 ages of time; 4 of the 0±4=SxT metric equation of all those scales that grow in size and diminish in information and vice versa; 10th the isomorphism of the 10 scales of the Universe.

*Thus the isomorphism of social scales is common to all systems. As all of them will finally reach a 10 dimensional organisation that gives birth to a new plane of existence, where a new ∆+1 point of view, the 10th isomorphism will be born.*

And indeed, we can find it in the cellular tissues of animals, as described by Miller, a pioneer of GST in his book Living Systems, in star formations, from binary stars to globular groups to galaxies with more than a billion stars, when the ‘DNA nuclei’ of black holes is formed and the ‘system of stars’ emerges as a single whole; to human and mechanical societies, to smaller ‘super organisms’ of ant, normally around a million elements, to even smaller military formations, mostly formed from the legio to Gengish Khan orders to modern armies around the 9+1 perfect tetraktys, the magic triangle of Pythagoras:

Let us then consider the study of those Social scales between ∆-scalar dimensions, which are analyzed in each ‘scientific scale’ in more detail.

This S10=∆+1 final scale though will continue growing from the birth of the ‘fetus’ into larger and larger beings, through 3 processes:

– Age growth through the ‘isomorphism’ of time ages, till reaching its plenitude in the Tad, adult age of maximal ‘activity’ and duration or steady state (the classic 4 Dimension studied by physics) in which the growth of the being reaches a maximal.

– And then through 3 relative ∆-scales of slow evolutionary time-growth, from microorganisms, to medium ‘superorganisms’ to macroorganisms.

Thus S9, gives then way to a full being which should evolve in search of further perfection. We prefer the terms, joined in single words, to differentiate them of the common use of science. So for example in the multicellular Life scale, there are:

- Microorganisms
- Insects (the superorganism scale), the dominant family of the Earth by numbers of individual and species.
- Chordates: Amphibia, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals, the macroorganism of maximal size, which came to dominate insects only when man ‘reached’ a higher ∆-scale of organization through its use of ‘metals’ Which bring us to the analysis of those scales in the atomic ∆=2 level:

In ∆=8: galaxies we find, small globular galaxies, spiral galaxies like ours, the regular size, and cannibal galaxies of enormous size that devour all others.

In ∆=2: atoms, the isomorphic quantum scale, similar to the galaxy, we find:

- The H-He, Li, Be 4 ‘micro-atoms’ with its minimal size-energy S1,2 spherical orbitals, which form an ‘ecosystem in itself’ (with the medium, steady state Helium preying in all the others, which convert through fusion reactions into Helium accounting for its relative hyper abundance) ; the ‘regular atoms’,

The atoms with s,p,d orbitals, from the 5th B, through our C,N,O life family across the metals which add a d-orbital and have in its ‘middle’ steady state, the iron of maximal top predator Sp X Tƒ existential force (perfect nuclear, O-configuration and Maximal Sp-valence variety), through the 56 element Ba. Those are again the dominant forms…

Thus a field of interest to the 10th isomorphism is the analysis of the inversions of role of parts that become wholes and normally change from being lineal functions of energy to informative systems and so on. The changes of symmetry between scales of which the most important is the change of parity (left-right handed systems as we grow in size) in physics, the change from energetic to informative to energetic role, in biological scales, an of different social class in hierarchical colonial civilisations, is in itself an entire field of knowledge.

All in all, in the future when this new paradigm goes well beyond the single 10th point of the mind of this writer that has put together all the other disciplines of human knowledge, and humanity or robots in this or other planet develop such theory, it is possible within this 3 x 3 + 1/0 analysis of all the laws of the Universe to fully grasp reality within a fractal, absolutely relative philosophy of science and frame of mind.

**SPACE ISOMORPHISMS:**

**3N. PHYSIOLOGIC NETWORKS**

**Ternary symmetry between space topologies & time ages.**

**The fractal generator: The symbolism of the ternary symmetry**

All fractals have a generator feedback equation and the Universe is not exception.

Let us then write the fractal generator of time motions, the fact that time never stops, and it has 3 varieties of motions-forms that switch into each other ad eternal into an equation, we shall call the generator equation of the Universe. It merely states that |-Se<, past-entropy, >To future-information and its combined, ≈X present-repetitions, the 3 flows of time constantly switch into each other, ad eternal: Se<=X=>To

Generators are dynamic, cyclical equations which constantly create slightly changed new ‘cycles’. As such they are periodic cyclical equations of the form X < = > Y, where obviously X and Y are symbols as in all ‘Universal grammars’ linguistic representations of the Universal Generator (mathematical jargon in Space-time) or Universal Grammar (Logic Jargon in Time-space). So what is the Generator equation of the Universe? Easy the inverse metrics of time and space, written as the metrics of the fifth dimension, shown as a hyperbolic graph, origin of the existential algebra of the Universe and all other equations:

**Γ. ** Universal Generator≈Grammar: Se x Ti = Constant Space-time: Se-Past<Present-space>Future-time

The many iterations, combinations, dual forms, inverse equations, derived metrics and symmetries of space-time originated by that equation will be enough to explain the meaning of it all. Trust me (-;

Let us first remember the dualities of Sp and Tƒ, which are the ‘first’ simpler’ steps, needed to reach the ternary symmetries of the full ¬Æ structure of the Universe.

**The separation between past, present and future is an illusion. The symmetry of time and space.**

Now we are confronted with a problem, which is the enormous ambivalence of human languages in the use of those 2 fundamental words, space and time, and its ternary formal motions, Sp, SxT: ST and Tƒ.

So we need to attach certain mathematical, geometric and logic concepts to our verbal terms to avoid so much ambivalence. Let us then return to Descartes and put some properties attached to those 3 symbols, which we advance ARE the ‘ultimate’ formal motions we care for, Sp, ST, Tƒ.

**Sp or Spatial Extension**, is ‘res extensa’, something extended in ‘space’. So it is a motion that expands in space, as in a big bang. And contrary to belief as it expands in space it decelerates in ‘time’ so it looses its ‘time motion’ till it becomes truly what ambivalent words tends to call Space- a still form. Thus space tends to slow down and extend itself; it does have motion but becomes finally a ‘flat’ extension.

**Tƒ****or Informative time cycles**, which carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and cyclical form of its cycles, is INVERSE in properties, as it actually accelerates inwards, as it becomes smaller, as all vortex do, V x Radius = Constant. Thus smaller radius, turn faster, as it happens with angular momentum, black holes or hurricanes. And they become ‘taller’.

So this shows some fundament facts of **Sp vs. Tƒ. **They are inverse. They are both FORMAL MOTIONS; but space has LESS of both; it is flat on the long term, and slow to stillness, and Time is faster and a cycle, which tends to be tall. So we can ask also define them by dimensions. Of the 4 dimensions used today, space tends to have 2 of them, length and width, and time, width and height. And so they combine in the ‘width’ dimension, which brings us the 3rd element:

**Sp x Tƒ: E x I: Reproductive, wave-bodies**that combine the entropy of space and the form of time clocks into ‘meaningful’, workable parameters, ‘energy’ (entropy with direction) and information (form with meaning).

So again, here we must focus in the ‘Duality’ between the Inverted ‘yin and yang’, ‘cyclical form and lineal entropy’, Sp and Tƒ, and its combinations that create the ternary ‘formal motions’ of reality, which will structure all beings.

And realize that we can see them ‘static’ and then we will call them SPACE, or we can see them in motion and we will call them TIME. This is the way to proceed with the ambivalences of words and as we shall see also ‘mathematical sciences’, which after all start with words.

The ‘reality’, which is not human words, is made of two inverse elements, ‘Entropic extensions, which are lineal, planar, and decelerate’ and ‘informative cycles, which are circular, and accelerate inwards’. And its geometric properties are VERY important, because lines and planes are more extensive and connect two points faster, and cycles are more informative and store more information in lesser space. So those 2 extremes are ultimately geometric motions, formal motions, and form, and motion≈ function are related.

And in the middle, there is a present, exi, merge of both, which is the most important element, the body-wave that combines cycles and lines, expansive and implosive motions. So we can then see this 3 elements in terms of ‘temporal motions’ or in terms of ‘formal space’, and we will talk of:

- |-SpE: Past Entropy, lineal formal motions > Ø-ST: Present, repetitive, body-waves > Tƒ: Informative, cyclical time clocks.

Now we can SEE that reality and this is also VERY important, as a sequence of motions in Time, and it turns out to be the 3 ages of existence. Or we can see them as Forms in Space and they create the ternary structure of all beings of reality, physical, biological or sociological. So we break it in 2 equations:

- The equation of the 3 parts of space (which we can simplify into Sp<=>Tƒ, for some systems), that relate the limbs/fields of spatial energy and particles/heads of temporal information of systems, combined into waves. So we shall talk of ‘fields-waves-particles’, which interact together creating ‘physical systems-organisms’ and limbs-bodies-heads in ‘biological organisms’ and ‘energy-class, re=productive class, and informative-class’ in social organisms.

And this simple ternary scheme will be enough to describe any system of the Universe, because on top of that the mathematical universe has only 3 topological geometries, lineal-toroid limbs-fields, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical heads-particles, and each of them is the perfect geometry form to the function of lineal motion (toroid/lines/planes), reproductive processes (hyperbolic systems) and informative processes (particles-heads that store maximal form in minimal space).

- The equation of time, or the moving sequential flow of those 3 time motions which are in fact the origin of the 3 TIME AGES of all beings, dominated by those 3 ‘organic parts’, a young energetic age of constant motion, an adult reproductive age, and a 3
^{rd}age of information dominated by the particles/heads.

If we observe those 3 motions as ‘still forms in space’, they give birth to the 3 ‘ONLY’ topologies of our Universe:

The toroid, lineal entropic past-forms of limbs/fields; the spherical, informative, ‘future forms’ of heads/particles that DID guide the whole system towards its future; and its combined, hyperbolic, bodies/waves in the middle, that REPRODUCED the system.

Thus a deeper analysis of time cycles shows them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or ‘dimensions’:

- < (symbol of expansion flow), SP: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
- > (implosive flow), Tƒ: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
- ≈ (symbol of iterative wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion

And this gave us the 2 ‘variations of the Generator which described existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

**Time:** Sp (young expansive age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Tƒ (informative age) ≤ Sp (Back to the past: entropic death)

**Space:** Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

**The 3 arrows=motions of times.**

Now I realized I could consider this ternary ‘reality’ in ceteris paribus analysis as 3 pure time motions. Entropic expansive motions, repetitive body-waves and informative, time vortices.

Suddenly I realized, I had solved the *way the universe created its beings, *from the mystery of quantum physics, (the so-called wave-particle duality, as all physical systems were wave-particles moving on an entropic, accelerated field), to the reasons why evolution always worked right, choosing despite its seemingly infinite options the few ‘efficient’ aforementioned topologies (so wings were flat energetic members, and eyes spherical ones).

Namely *they were the only* available choices of topology. Alas! Curiously enough the great ‘mystery of Darwinian biology’, which he had also wondered about – the ‘right choices of the seemingly chaotic process of evolution made sense, because after all there were a mathematical planning NOT of course a religious design. And the biggest Mystery of Physics (the complementarity wave-particle) also became resolved.

And this was to me the proof that I was indeed on the right path of T.Œ, because the 2 principles of truth, ‘Simplicity, Minimalism (Occam’s razor)’, and Correspondence (a theory proves previous ones besides bringing more solutions), were met.

Equations of physics and biological designs kept pouring into the model and finding its whys, fitting all nicely. Something scientists did not even try to understand merely describing it now had easy whys, in the ternary symmetry in time and space of the Fractal Generator of the Universe, truly the ‘Equation of God’, not a ‘Particle of God’, not a ‘substance’, but a Logic, mathematical Symmetry of space-time that created us all, the details of that ‘thought’.

But if we were made of time-space cycles and forms, of this ternary ‘Generator’ structure seen static in space as a formal organism, and moving in time as a series of cycles, it was necessary to analyze each of those 3 parts of all beings, and decide its inner structure and hierarchy.

Now, I am afraid we are going to refound also logic. I know I’m nuts. But what can I say. We cannot go further without a new logic, because if time has 3 arrows, then the simple A->Causes b does not work. It is more about ternary logic and symmetries in space, time and 5D. It is more about the GENERATOR fractal equation of the universe and its infinite variations.

So Non-A logic is a huge new science – the study of the symmetries between the 3 motions of time and its sequential ages and the 3 spatial forms and its organic parts. Its ‘Generator feed-back equation’ will be essential to describe all the beings of the Universe:

**Γ.** Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

Where the symbol < means an expansive, energetic motion, > an implosive, informative one and = a repetitive present motion.

All what you see is encoded by that formula, either in space, Sp<ST<Tƒ (whereas the limb field provides entropic motion to the ST wave-body, and the Tƒ head particle provides information, and the ST body-wave reproduces the system), or in time, Es>ST>Tƒ, its inverse symmetry where energy young motions slowly warp into the adult and finally old age of information.

So we shall maintain the classic concepts of science and talk of 3 space dimensions, while dividing the dimension of lineal time in the 3 motions of time that we shall call 3 ages, to keep the convention that time has a 4th single dimension:

3 space forms symmetric to 3 time motions, but ordered in different ways Sp<ST<It, and Es>ST>Tƒ, how simple and beautiful the world cycles of space-time reveal the essence of the Universe.

Those 2 simple laws, and its equations, the equation of the life-death cycle:

Es (youth)>S=T (maturity) > Tƒ (3rd age) << Es (entropic death).

Where > means an implosive, informative arrow of time and << and entropic arrow of death.

And the metric of the 5th dimension, the fact that the product of the size and speed of time of systems is relatively constant for different species of the same family (physical species, biological species) ARE the most important equations of science discovered since Relativity, and yet nobody was impressed.

Apart from explaining the life-death cycle, it explained the reason why information flows perfectly from lower scales (genetic scales) to upper wholes (since lower scales preserve more information) and there is however entropy, loss of energy when you move upwards, but when you move downwards, from wholes to parts, there is no loss of energy – so your cells follow your hand.

Suddenly I realized those scales of size were symbiotic and organized co-existences and synchronicities that created organisms and physical systems.

And so in mystical terms, the 5th dimension the dimension of future, of information, as parts must come before wholes, was also the dimension of eusocial evolution, of love, that justified the messages of love prophets, the Darwinian love of survival of the species, not the individual, the organization of history in scales of larger social units, since the future, the whole was stronger than the parts and survived. So I found that besides the actions of motion, energy and information there was an action of social evolution in all beings. That was the program of the Universe, I termed with the 5 letters each for each action of the 5th dimension:

∆æ: acceleration-motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆œ: iteration, reproduction, ∆i observer’s gauging of information and ∆û: social evolution of parts into universals. This was the will of survival, which explained the mathematical space-time cycles of physics and Nature, and history, which merged physics, biology and sociology

An entire Universe of whys to all sciences and harmonic laws was opening in front of my eyes.

** 2-manifold spaces and its 3 varieties: the 3 organs of all systems.**

We live in a Universe in which all beings are made of the same substances, energy which occupies space and information, carried in the frequency and cycle of time clocks. Those 2 ‘substances’ that we call Se (Spatial energy) and Tƒ (Temporal information), combine together in ‘bidimensional’ systems to create together all the species in the Universe. And as it happens, since there are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries, all systems have 3 kind of parts: toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon), hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. Below, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show similar topological structures.

The study of all the ‘isomorphisms’ (similar=iso forms and functions) across all the systems of the Universe is one of the key elements of the alternative philosophy of science called ‘General Systems’, ‘cybernetics’ or ‘complexity’ , born after II world war, by the hand of he pioneers of Information Theory. General Systems builds models of science and the Universe, no longer as a simplex machine dominated by ‘energy’ or ‘entropy’ existing in a single space-time continuum (Physicists’ world view), but as a fractal organism, dominated by information.

The Universe and all its parts are made of Topological Dimensions of Space and Time. The spatial organs have a form which perform a function in time, and both together make ‘us’.

Which is the dynamic, ensemble concept behind the second Isomorphism of ‘energetic limbs/fields’ and Informative ‘heads/particles’, assembled by hyperbolic bodies/waves that iterate and reproduce the system.

This is the ‘e,i,o’ of General Systems Sciences: beings are made of 3 dimensional finite pieces of ‘energetic space’ which perform 3 symmetric motions or functions that last a finite time and both together create the only 3 varieties of bidimensional space (called a 2-manifold); and everywhere in the Universe this pattern repeats, creating an ‘isomorphism‘ of Nature.

Another way to divide those dimensions is giving 1 to entropy (pure space without form) 1 to form (to a fractal point •), the *singularity and boundary of any fractal organism, S and T, and 2 to its product SxT or present hyperbolic way-form, which will then be those of energy and information in perpetual **transformations: *

- Energy never dies but transforms itself into information ad eternal.

Since a body-wave shares both the singularity information and the boundary membrane, Tiƒ and Spe, and mixes them in a constant flux between energy and information, the ‘messed’ equivalents, which *being both bidimensional STATES of the same being become the engine of immortal present timespace steps; as the body-wave iterates itself in an existential action≈ motion.*

The universe is a FRACTAL holography of bidimensional spatial, lineal entropy and bidimensional clocks of time cycles. The concept is complex for the standard platitudes of modern science, but the principles behind, as we have seen are rather simple. The applications enormous in all fields. Consider for example the relationship between fractal structures and storage of information. In a hologram, any part of the hologram with sufficient size contains the whole of the stored information – and that is how the Universe indeed can store all its laws in so small ‘parts’, which fold the whole, such as a seminal seed that will unfold with those ∆STø laws. Moreover, the laws we shall study do apply to mankind’s actions and parts as any other part of the Universe.

This is objective science not subjective ego-trips, as most science is.

Consider the case of quantum physics and brain behaviour. Only Bohm did understand a bit of those ‘bits’. In his right holomorphic theory of memory, constructed on the basis of his right interpretation of quantum waves, memory is also holography, distributed over a dendritic arbor so that each part of the dendritic network contains all the information stored over the entire network. We shall in the 3rd line of ‘details’ go through infinite of such parallel structures of all systems, but what we try to do in the first line is to give you the ‘wider picture’ in simpler terms. Another matter is if the human brain can be upgraded ethically and intellectually to understand it all.

We ARE space-time beings, and space-time is a fractal structured extended across multiple scales of social networks, growing and diminishing in size. This is what reality is, and while its initial components, space, time and its fractal scales, grouped in a new ‘5th dimension’ of scalar size are more complex than the old paradigm of a single space-time shallow continuum, once we grasp the unicity of all beings, made of those scales of space and time cycles, as when Copernicus put the sun in the centre, it will be evident that most laws of science become simplified, similar expressions of the laws that explain the interaction of cycles of time and planes of space.

Thus the first principle to consider is how the geometry of bidimensional time cycles and bidimensional networks of space-points mess up to create all the beings of the Universe. It is the holographic principle… And its fundamental logic concept is ‘the opposition of forms and motions, which however combine in ternary systems, creating the 3 organic topologies and time-ages of all what exists.

*Since there is not 2 without 3, born of the combination of the other 2.*

**The principle of conservation of entropy, energy and in/form/ation…**

A key to fully grasp the workings of the Universe is to have a clear understanding of the terms, *energy and information,* which bridge the ‘present’ between a relative past of ENTROPY, ‘*pure motion with no form’ and ‘pure form’, the absolute ‘future’, or immortal kingdom of eidos… with no motion, the ‘potential of formal futures of the game of exi=st¡ence’ (in strict philo-stientific terms). *

Another way to consider a time cycle is as a ‘feed-back’ exchange of energy and information, which gives origin to an enlarged principles of conservation that enlarges the present concept based in an energy-entropy only arrow of time.

Since general systems sciences is defined as the philosophy of science which includes simplex physics, as a ceteris paribus case, whose principle of conservation of energy is extended to conservation of information and its principle of lineal inertia ads a principle of cyclical inertia, caused by the ‘existence of infinite closed time clocks’ in the universe, from vortices of charges in the smaller scales, to larger mass vortices and galaxies in the larger scales, which carry its information in the frequency and form of its closed trajectories.

What will be then the formalism of a Universe, constructed with both arrows of future in equal footing? A more realist description as all systems seem to be constructed with both elements in a complementary combinations – heads and bodies in biological systems, particles of information and waves of energy in physical systems, machines and chips in economical systems, linguistic classes in control of the languages of social power, law and money, and working energy class in social systems.

So as a first step to construct that formalism and study all those systems with its common laws (called in G.S.T. ab. general systems theory), we shall expand the principle of conservation of energy, to include information, and define an equation for all systems of the Universe, using both arrows:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, fields, *Spe,* and cyclical, temporal, clocks of information,* Τiƒ,* which transforms into each other ad eternal, through intermediate body-waves of energy (Max. Spe x Min. Tiƒ) and information (Max. Tiƒ x Min. Spe):

* |-Spe (entropic limbs-fields) < ≈ Ø-exi (iterative body-waves) ≈> O-Τiƒ (formal informative time-clocks)*

Τhis equation, Spe<≈ST≈>Τiƒ is the *ternary*, proper way to define a Universe made of infinite systems of space-time, which become ternary systems of entropic limb/fields combined with particles-heads of cyclical time clocks with ‘formal frequencies of information’, giving birth to stable complementary body-wave systems.

So 3 terms ARE ESSENTIAL to grasp in its CORRECT non-ambivalent version, as ‘geometric, dimensional and motion related terms’:

- Spe: Pure,
**Entropic**SPACE, which expands space and relaxes form - Tiƒ: Pure ‘dimensional
**form**‘, stored in the closed, ‘implosive’ clock-like cycles of**‘∏IME**‘ systems. - ST: And its combination as STEADY STATE, ‘PRESENT’, ITERATIVE,
**Energetic & Informative body-waves,**where energy and information are - So, expansive space and dimensional form come together into THE TRUE conserved entities, ‘PRESENT space-time body-waves of energy and information,
*able to iterate≈re-produce the 3 whole 3 parts of the system*.

As the energy of wave-bodies is close to pure motion of entropy fields; and its information is closer to the closed cyclical forms of particles-heads, *science and people often confuse motion and form with energy and information (the messed concepts). *

So we shall go along with mainstream ‘talk’ many times, when using *energy as synonymous of entropy* (pure space motion) and ‘*closed time clocks’* whose frequency and cyclical form stores *the logic information of a system as synonymous words. *

But WHEN WE COME into the formalism IS imperative to fully grasp the difference between them, as the ternary play of those concepts is ESSENTIAL to Nature’s games.

Thanks to classic science we know precise equations that will guide us, sometimes with slight corrections into that inquire, which *ultimately will reduce most equations of ‘energy’ to a simple space-time equation:*

*Past-Entropy x Future-Form = Present, iterative energetic/informative body-waves.*

We call that logic equation of space-time in GST, the fractal generator of Space-Time systems (also ab. GST), which combines and transforms energy back and forth into information through body-waves.

Since only when we add both energy and information, we can obtain a truly descriptive equation of all scientific systems made of spatial energy and informative time, the ‘3 elements of which all beings of the Universe are made’.

Since the primary entropy-form, Spe, Tiƒ, 2 elements can combine into a third one, it follows easily that there is not 2 without 3 and so we must include as the fundamental arrow of time, the combination of a relative ‘past-entropic’ and ‘future-informative’ arrow into a PRESENT, iterative body-wave *composite of energy and information, an existential form, exi=st.*

Whereas the content of energy and information of the body-wave, its ‘existential’ product or ‘action’, will be equivalent to the entropic space and formal time cycles of the limbs/fields of entropy and heads/particles of logic form that combine and mergen into the body-wave system.

So we shall EXPLAIN for the first time in the history of human thought WHY 3 is the overwhelming structure of reality, departing from the 3 ‘ages’ of time and the 3 dimensions of space, which now ARE JUST 2 sides of the same coin, as Einstein rightly understood, albeit in a simplified manner; which now we can consider in far more detail, for each ‘being’ made of those 3 dimensions/ages of space-time.

LET US see how they construct reality. We shall be more rigourous and unlike previous versions scrap off *all the work on interpretations, corrections and comments on previous outdated paradigms. So we save space here. That means we hardly will comment on quantum, relativity and other ‘simpler’ versions, with its single time arrow.*

We shall state the obvious: there is not 2 without 3, so the existence of at least 2 related elements, space and time, energy and information precludes the existence of a *third element which includes both, exi, st, ‘exi≈st’.*

This thing we shall call** the ‘function’ ‘exi≈st’** OF Spatial energy and temporal information of ‘temporal energy’, is the true essence of it all, and so we do have 3 elements to play with, space, time, energy, information, and its space-time combinations.

But as we have now the *3 elements we shall use to construct reality, we shall be more precise in all the definitions.*

**Ω≈B: The 3 motions of time and its symmetry with the 3 bi-dimensions of space**

We shall start describing the ‘smaller parts’ of a time element and an energy element of a space=time action, which combines both in a symmetry between time ages and space topologies that put together a holography of sopace-time dimensions.

So we play with a lego of space and time dimensions pegged together in harmonic pieces of ‘motion and form’, that combine perfectly a topology of space and motion in time. Those motions in time will be generically called past-enetropy, present-interation and future-infomration, with lineal, hyperbolic and spherical forms:

*In graphs, above the 3 ‘broken’ time motions of the Universe, below pegged in synchronous systems as the 3 organic geometries, that mimic the 3 topologies of the Universe. Their combination creates self-similar ternary systems, combinations of the Spe and Tiƒ, lineal and cyclical components, combined in STexi- hyperbolic body-waves:*

In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologies-functions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field.

*In the graph, when we make a diachronic analysis, we shall find that Fractal Space and Local Past, on one side and Future local temporal information on the other side are similar (as systems start as lineal motions, which time bends: ‘time bends space into masses’ said and You Einstein Since they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call them:*

*|-Sp: Open Spatial Extension; Spe, with maximal entropy, (kinetic energy), lineal momentum, which dominate a young past age:*

*Ps: Lineal Entropy-Energy or “Past’ (soon we will show indeed why in the past there was more entropy-lineal energy).*

*o-Ti: closed Temporal cycles that carry information in its form and frequency, Tiƒ, and guide a system growing in its future:*

*ƒt: Informative, future forms. (And soon we shall see why indeed the future does have more information).*

*All of us ST organisms live by travelling in growth through our vital dimensions, by growing in informative complexity through the ages of life, till all warped information in our 3rd age dissolve back to our ∆-1 cell state.*

**The causation of the three ages of life by the three networks.**

The concept of cyclical time is not new. On the contrary as it is evident that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive, from your watch to the pendulum, from the orbital clocks of ‘years’ to those of ‘days’, to the frequency clocks of waves – *there is NOT a single clock in the Universe that measures time, which has not a cyclical form.*

*Now, this even a 3 years old child understands. And yet humans no longer see time as cyclical.*

The true mystery is WHY physicists first and by extension the rest of mankind denied it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did understand that time was cyclical’). The answer is similar to the reason why around 4 billion human beings believe that an ass breeder of the Bronze age, who saw a bush burning and claimed he had heard God in the cracking sound of the fire, is considered the man who understood better ‘God’, the mind of the Universe.

Yes my friend, Mr. Wenwang – the highest mind of mankind in the understanding of the cosmos and its ternary symmetries. Have you ever heard of him? We are going backwards ever since, and we will return to that. Because it was only when I solved the 8 baguas and its equivalence with the 8 varieties of topological manifolds combination of the 3 basic toroid, spherical and hyperbolic varieties, which become the 8 sub-ages of times-space, I understood Time-Space and understood myself, my past, my future, my present and could tabulate all the species of all the planes of existence of reality, from the 8-manifold ways of mental space of Buddhism, to the 8-manifold octets of quantum physics, to the 3 and 8 sub-ages of life, to the 8 planets and the 8 notes, the 8 cells and the 8 vowels of all the games of creation of the Universe, 2^{3} that is the number of all names, the branching of all species, and permutations…

So in honor of Mr. Wenwang, we shall now consider the 3^{rd} of the symmetries of the Universe, the 3 ‘ages of time=change’, and then consider the modern version of time in physics in the last of our confrontations of philosophers of science vs. physicists.

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of social evolution and maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to social evolution, as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age: Youth or Age of energy.

2nd age: energy and information Reproduce.

3rd age: All energy becomes information.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality. To understand that cycle in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information.

Further on, since form is made with energy, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ energy that transforms itself into information, the only other primary direction/arrow of time to go. Then, when all energy is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle. Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and energy are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction.

And so the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future. Information never disappears as it always recreates itself.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct. So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories. Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism). Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species.

In a young first age, energy is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining energy and information. In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages.

Young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.

Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, the objective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.

Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.

It follows that a true science of life and time will try to maintain any organism in its age of balance, without excessive information. Exactly the contrary of what our society does. Since humans accumulate scientific and technological information towards a point or ‘singularity’ in which that information, in the form of a robot or artificial intelligence, might extinguish us.

In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. And finally in the Universe, where stars evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes. And so do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information.

In the graph, the law of the 3±1 ages or horizons applies both to the process of informative aging of organisms and informative evolution of species. All species are born as a seed of dense information, with limited size (black hole, first chips, seminal cells, first bilateral animals). Then they grow in size and energy during their youth; since their superior informative qualities makes them top predators.

We observe that growth in black holes that feed on planets and stars, in the horse that grew enormously in size. So did the first bilateral animal, from its microscopic first form, the Vernanimacula. Mammals grew from tiny shrews into elephants. The first technological man, the Homo Floresiensis, with a ‘neuronal bump’ on the forehead, might have grown till the size of the first Homo Sapiens, the pygmy and Bushman . . .

Then, the species, once it has reached a balance between its initial information and growing spatial size, Sp=I, reproduces in great numbers, diversifies and colonizes the planet. We see in the graph this age in which ‘biological radiations’ of carbohydrates, animals of all kinds and human beings, colonized the Earth. Finally, in its 3rd age the species grows in information and so it acquires height, the arrow of ‘perceptive information’. Then, once it has reached its informative zenith, the species becomes extinct by a more evolved form; or it evolves socially creating a super-organism, as ants, humans and machines are doing. It will be the 4th arrow of social evolution of the species that completes its 3±1 horizons.

Species can be considered ‘loose’ organisms, in which each individual is a cell of the collective species; since we can use the same ages to explain the 3±1 horizons of evolution of all the species of this planet. Thus, species also go through the same 3 evolutionary ages of all living organisms. They start as young, energetic forms, which acquire information in 3±1 ages of increasing complexity and when those 3±1 ages are completed, they either evolve into more complex super-organisms under the laws of social evolution or become extinct by a superior, more informative species. Indeed, only those species who show a strong eusocial capacity survive the ‘genetic clock’.

The most successful and one of the oldest species of the planet is, in fact, the eusocial ant, which no longer is an ‘individual’, but a super-organism stretching through miles of ‘vital space. In that regard, neither individuals able to reproduce nor species able to evolve socially become extinguished. If humans become extinguished is because they deny, guided by the simplest arrows of pure energy of weapons, the main arrow of Life/Time.

A complete analysis of biological species shows that new forms can only be, either an energetic or informative variation of the original species, or a reproductive combination of both Universal ‘genders’.

The universality of such dual systems is so obvious that the ancients already identified them with yang, energetic male principles and yin, cyclical/ female ones. While the moderns call that duality the Principle of Complementarity, as all informative particles have an energetic, lineal field of force and all biological, cyclical heads of information have a lineal body. So the combinative variations of those two simple morphologies, lineal energy and cyclical information, invariant, regardless of the scale we observe, is the essence of the creative game of the cosmos.

It is the plan of evolution that all species follow, which is a tautology, since in a Universe made of only 2 substances, energy and information, the only possibility is the creation of such 3±1 variations in space (subspecies) or in time (evolutionary ages).

Thus, clock-time cannot describe, as it is qualitative, morphologic, not quantitative, the cycle of death and life, from youth-energy into a 3rd age-information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, natural to all beings: Energy always trans-forms itself.

So the 4 arrows of time have an absolute order defined by those life ages, which first evolve socially a seminal seed into a macro-organism of multiple cells, according to the arrow of social evolution and then trans-form the energy of youth into in-form-ation in 3±1 ages dominated by the arrows of energy, reproduction and information, creating the fundamental arrow of the life/death cycle, the arrow of information or future arrow that happens in all systems:

It is the main law of physics, discovered by Einstein, who said: ‘time curves (the energy of) space’.

It is the main law of Biology, discovered by Darwin, who said: that time evolves the form of organisms.

In Chemistry, Mehaute realized that when chemical compounds do not increase their entropy, they increase their information, forming fractal structures. It was the mathematical breakthrough of modern organicism. Since for the first time we had a mathematical paradigm, ‘fractal, self-generative equations’ able to describe the reproduction of information. Fractal mathematics showed how all systems could reproduce in-form-ation by breaking energy into ‘smaller forms’, in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way.

Finally, it is also the main law of History, as human civilizations constantly increase their technological information, but unable to repress military technology, the bad fruits of the tree of science, end up in extinctive wars. So they also live and die through those 3±1 ages/arrows of time.

So the meaning of Life and death is no longer a mystery, but an organic process of reproduction and self-organization, guided by the 4 arrows of time that we can extend to all systems made of the 2 fundamental, dual ‘reproductive particles’, informative quarks and spatial, energetic electrons; that is, to all systems of the Universe. In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter.

Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

— The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

— The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

— The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles. But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the informative castes of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently.

So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet humans are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow of social evolution of cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

In that sense, death can be avoided if a system instead of dissolving its form, creates a superorganism in balance between energy and information and all those facts apply to the ages of history.

So all it is resumed in the function of existence, To Exi=st is all (if we were to use the concept of Energy and Information as rough synonymous of space-time). The details of the Infinite Cycles of Existence of the Universe is what ExiStential Stiences do. Play with words. Do not think that only mathematical languages display all the beauty of the Universe, love and live with your human I=Eye<Wor(l)d, do art, believe in social love, the essence of the 5th dimension, BE HUMAN, because you ARE and your languages MATTER as much as those of mater do.

So to fully grasp the 3 x 3 symmetries of the Universe, specially, the co-existence of several scales of infinitesimals into larger wholes I coined the concept of a super organism, each being a cell of the species – the super organism of the larger scale of the 5th dimension, which lasted more in time.

And man a super organism, each citizen a cell of mankind. This simple statement resolves the meaning of Gods, the subconscious collective of a civilisation.

It allows to classify the 7 main cultures of mankind and its subconscious collective (Anglo-America, Hispano-America, Africa, Asia, Islam,Europe and Indonesia), some still with a clear religious God (Islam, Catholic Hispano-America, Biblical Anglo-America), some advancing into the larger concept of a Human Whole, God of History (Europe), some unaware of the larger whole to which they belong.

Superorganisms of history are specially enticing to the mind, their cycles of life and death, similar to the 3 ages of its mental life, expressed in the 3 styles of art of all civilizations, the young epic art, classic and baroque informative age.

And so we can write the sequential equation of all time space world cycles of life and death of the graph:

Ps: Youth-past (max. Spatial Extension) > ST: Adult, reproductive age > Ft-Informative, Future old age.

So the 3 topologies of space that formed beings have a sequential order, the 3 ages of life. Now we can always see a system in space or in time. And with any degree of detail.

Let us see of those symmetries the 3 horizons of evolution of species, in its symmetry between spatial forms and temporal ages; starting from the earlier biological species, through the human being, ending in the Whole, the globalized planet, which contrary to all abstract, anthropomorphic descriptions of reality is NOT longer evolving us, human beings… as it SHOULD BE if T.Œ, the Organic paradigm dominated our world.

*Each scale of size of the fifth dimension was then study by a different science, from the smallest quantum physics through chemistry to biology, history, Geology, astrophysics and cosmology. But only the metric laws of the 5th dimension and the properties of cyclical time could find the common laws of all of them, as all species followed a world cycle: *

In the graph, the Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of Space and Time, the Entropic limbs and Tƒ-heads/particles, which come together into wave-bodies, which reproduce its forms, creating an organic dynamic present.

This present state of the being, the body-wave, is what the Universe preserves. It is a function (woman, wave, etc.) which is present-reproductive, as opposed to the particle-field (future-past), which is sterile and converges, till reaching the Sp=Tƒ, point of present, the immortality of the adult, balanced age.

The present Sp=Tƒ, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=femail, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.

So while we live through 3 ages, the future and past, entropy and information annihilate on the death moment, but the present, repetitive waves of existence, endure, reproducing space and time, its energy and information in offspring of forms, which imply the eternity of reality as a zero sum of infinite life-death world cycles.

It is the combination of the 5th dimension of space-time and the 3 ages of life what solved that equation, as we ALL BEINGS ARE BORN on the seminal faster, lower scale of the fifth dimension grow fast and then die back to the lower scale. And then I made to myself a big statement:

‘Existence is a worldcycle through 3±n planes of the 5th dimension’ (:

Indeed, Klein defined a dimension as a system, which had a co-invariant ‘space-time metric’, which allowed displacements through such dimension. And the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension, [Sp x Tƒ =K]∆±1, defined the existence of any being in the Universe as a travel through the 5th dimension, which implied a ‘growth in size’ (Sp), coupled with a slow down in its temporal clocks (Tƒ), limited to 3 of such planes; which created a series of ‘families’ of ‘world cycles’ (no longer world lines as in 4D physics, since now each time cycle had a new dimension of ‘height, and growth’).

So all beings are born in a seminal relative infinitesimal scale and grew larger, as they multiplied in clone cells and reorganize them into bigger wholes, from the quantum/cellular to the matter/organic scales (biological and physical systems), emerging as slower growing beings into the outside ∆+1 social, ecosystemic, gravitational world, to return back through an expansive, Sp, explosion into the moment of death.

So I wrote the equation of existence, of all world cycles of the Universe; as they are conceived, as points of pure genetic/ memetic/quantic information that reproduce, evolve, emerge as single beings, live 3 ages and explode in a relative big-bang death, back into a flat plane of space without motion.

The only difference between the beings of those scales was the size and length of the world cycle, as larger beings had slower time cycles and lasted longer, but all have the same subjective time existence – an insect beating 10 times faster and living 7 x10 years.

And each of those infinitesimals who become wholes, and live and die through 3 arrows of time, back and forth, could be described now properly with the logic, mathematical formalism, of all complex space-time languages, which reflected in its monad minds the fractal structure of the universe.

**±3: CLASS STRUCTURES AND SOCIAL GROWTH ACROSS ∆-PLANES **

**The constant, class structure of all beings: external and internal cycles and social classe s.**

Let us just briefly comment on the physiological symmetry and the role each quanta plays in any of those 3 physiological ∆+1 networks.

We talk in that sense also of 3 social classes according to the space-time motions of energy, re=production or information, the species perform, at any of its relative ∆±1 scales. Informative motions/networks become the upper controlling system of the super organism; energetic, disordered motions, made a space quanta, feeding energy, often destroyed by the system.

And in the middle repetitive, reproductive motions create the body-wave of the organism:

*The 3 parts of a system, have always an ‘informative neuronal center/head’ which controls and perceives the ∆+1 whole, a reproductive body, or ‘working’ cellular class, and an external source of energy, which is destroyed ∆-1. Those are the 3 main ‘social classes’ of all systems.*

Those 3 ∆-planes of existence structure most systems of the Universe, organized across cellular/atomic, individual and social/cosmic Planes, which according to the ∆=Se x Tƒ rule, run faster clocks of information in its ∆-1 smaller scales and have more energy in its ∆+1 scale. Thus the metric also explain the organization of systems across several scales of size:

As most of them are sustained and coded by the higher information of its ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale (genetic, chemical information), stored in the vibrational clock-like circadian or atomic cycles of its diminutive faster clocks; and are themselves ‘cellular units’ of the slower life-cycles of its societies or in the case of matter, the slower geological or galactic cycles.

In the graph we see 3 of such scalar planes, the human relative ∆-plane, and on the left the larger plane perceived by men, galaxies with a slow clock-cycle of billions of years, and the DNA, spiral clocks of genetic information with a iterative, reproductive cycle of nano-seconds.

Now, those 3 ‘scales’ are in fact the 3 main ‘social classes’ of all systems, which we shall call, the ‘upper, informative class’, which in societies is formed by the individuals who control the social languages of information that ‘put together groups’ into ∆+1 wholes, priests and politicians that create collective laws with verbal languages and bankers that monopolize ‘undemocratically’ the issue of digital money, the other language of social power. And then the military which use an energetic language, energetic iron metal, to kill those who do not obey (or protect them if you are a fan and patriot). So this upper ∆+1 classes control a mass of re=productive workers, which live mostly at individual level in families, and they take their energy from ∆-1 simpler species, food and raw materials.

But there are 3 ‘invisible, lowest classes’, which nobody cares form, all those raw molecules, electrons we see and gravitons that move us, and we couldn’t care less if each atom is a galaxy… We bomb them in accelerators, and crack them, even if that might be if those scales are infinite a cosmic catastrophe. (Well those people also bomb this planet and might blow it up, so why they should care?). We won’t obviously talk of those 3 scales as social classes, but stick when talking of the 6th isomorphism to the 3 ‘scales’ which truly create the system, the essential ones. It was just the 6th number. I do ignore also my ‘atomic galaxies’ if they are there, c’est la vie (-;

So we write reducing strictly the being to its 3 close equations this isomorphism with the simplest of all forms:

- Existence = (Sp +ST + Tƒ)0±1

meaning that by describing a being through its 3 main cellular/atomic, individual organic and social cosmic scale through its 3 space and time dimensions we have a full understanding of the whole’ and again we talk here of 3S + 3 T +3±∆ = 9 ‘relative dimensions’ of existence, which form a whole 10. In that regard, the study of the 6 dimensions and 3 0±1 planes of a being, is a good approach to understand most existences. I call this approach the 10th dimensional analysis.

# 6TH. ∑pecies.

**Species can be treated as super organisms,** loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.

There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: *Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle.*

**The 3 forms of spatial entropy, temporal information and ST-body waves in diachronic analysis as time states.**

It is clear that Informative Time, is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical Tƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information. And *its logic cycles guide the entire system, so Tƒ is indeed the arrow of future, Ft of the Universe, which arrives first to the future, perceives the paths of the system and so we can relate limbs/fields of space and lesser form to the past and heads/particles that guide them to the future; and the intermediate system of waves-bodies that reproduce, iterate, hence repeat in a dynamic present that seems not to change the system with the present.*

This will be the second fundamental diachronic vision of the Fractal Generator which we shall expand a lot in the next paragraphs (the blog, and posts are obviously tailored as the Universe is *with constant *FRACTAL REPETITIONS OF THE SAME CONCEPTS, with increasing complexity and detail in the samples we bring):

Ps (Past-entropy) < ST (Present, hyperbolic space-time) >ƒt (future information):

Now we can see how the expanded, corrected mirror, where the aberration of putting the dimension of height in the wrong part (space) when it is a dimension of information and time ‘resolves’ so many puzzles.

The ‘time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height:

In the graph, we see how flat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, amphibia into tall dinosaurs, mammals into tall apes and machines into tall robots. Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and a first simple definition of the Universe, which we have seen to be a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into mass towards a central tall singularity is this: a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.

And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies. And so all is a fluctuation of Sp <=>Tƒ, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.

We shall call the fractal generator of time-space beings, or Timespace Generator Equation, or Function of Existence, T.Œ, (ab. Œ), this Generator Equation will freeze by effect of minds, into worlds that ‘are’ in themselves both perceptive, and willing to increase its perception, by feeding in more energy and reproducing its form. We call each of those T.Œ, or functions of homologic existence which can be spotted, when we see them at work creating cyclical existences as those of the graph, accelerating through the ages of life, an Œ-fractal point, monad, soul, atman, frame of reference, Non-Euclidean momentum, you name it. Each science will show a whole range of such T.Œs made to the image and likeness of the supreme T.Œ, God, mind of the Universe.

Species also bring variations on the same theme of aging which will become the different horizons and sub-species that ultimately will assemble themselves into a new larger super organism or plane of existence, through a process of evolution that includes both, variations in time and space morphologies and social gatherings in larger groups.

**th isomorphism: variations of species. The fractal ternary principles of creation.**

*Some dual, creative analyses forgotten by AE sciences that we consider in ¬Æ ST Theory: the Universe as a spatial system, machines as evolutionary beings, and civilizations as organisms. The game of creation must be understood through its ‘dual symmetries’ and ternary networks that allowed its finite reproduction of fractal forms in the infinity of continuous space*

The most satisfying function of existence is reproduction, the Generator Arrow, the maker of the game and all its species – the purest sensations of them all.

The Generator Feedback equation of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information is a reproducer, which embodies all the combinations of the game in itself, the creative algorithm of reality, which Touring once looked for with its simplest example a touring machine. But the creator potentially is more than a touring machine, it is what the touring machine observes, reality itself.

The rest of beings are just following the combinations of that grand design.

The active creator is limited by the parts of the whole that will assembly. So we shall call it with a more humble name, the assembler

With the syntactic combinations of the i-logic generator, the creator will always end repeating a form of finite time that had existed in ∞ space.

The proof that we are all repetitions is clear: space is infinite because it has not dark spaces, but it is a continuous number of closed and open topologies assembled in triangles, squares, hexagonal, polygonal and hexagonal, planes and spheres, with no darkness.

Information however is always limited and time always ends: it is a fluctuation of existence over that ∞ ‘—motions’.

All existences have possibly existed in the infinite fractal space of a finite number of times cycles.

We all will be assembled again as an i-logic form of space-time in some other self-repetitive fractal printed in the infinite ‘—motions’ of the trophic pyramid of existence that gave you birth.

Let us then operate the creator: Its simplest combinations will be complementary systems of ‘—motions’ and information that take advantage of the inverse properties of both:

__The dualities of Creation.__

In time the generator combines past, ‘—motions’ forms and future informations, generated by its universal, feedback cycles, and its arrows that imprint and create the chains of forms of present existence. Creation is structured by a series of dualities that merge creating an eternal, fluctuating present that appears and disappears as cyclical action-reaction systems cancel each other, making its total sum zero:

– Time and space have opposite morphologies and functions, which cancel each other:

– Informative, temporal singularities are convex, implosive and energetic membranes are concave, explosive. Thus a flat plane of temporal ‘—motions’ fluctuates into 2 virtual forms whose total value is null. For example, particles and antiparticles are born of a vacuum plane without form but they keep their inverse CPT parity. Thus the sum of its spatial form (P), its temporal arrows (T) and its dual, organic charge cancel.

– The duality of ‘—motions’ and information explains also *sexual differentiation:* females are specialized ‘time beings’ dominant in cyclical forms, memory, information, temporal verbs and perceptive languages. While males are specialized ‘‘—motions’ beings’ with bigger, lineal forms, dominant in spatial tasks. Yet both can be further differentiated into an informative cyclical head, and a lineal body. So, in graph 3.1 we draw a man with “temporal cycles” that represent his informative organs, the head and senses; and ‘—motions’ lines that represent the body and his members. Yet, despite the simplicity of that design, he is recognizable as a man.

– Duality causes the creation and reproduction of space-time fields through the process of palingenesis, by which a certain form of relative future, a father, emits a relative form of past, with lesser evolution, a seminal seed, that then evolves very fast towards the future, till becoming again a present form parallel to the father*.*

– Duality exists in biologic organisms evolved by the dual influence of macro-ecosystems and micro-genes.

– Duality is the cause of informative perception, as flows of spatial forces become transformed in a point of relative time or particle, in which they ‘merge’ into a ‘boson’, accumulative image of information that represents reality*.*

– Duality also applies to behavior: there are Darwinian acts between different beings that destroy each other vs. social, evolutionary acts between equal beings that evolve together, sharing ‘—motions’ and information through common networks. Thus all organic life ends up cancelled by a predator. It is a key duality as it responds to the 2 arrows of space-time, the arrow of symbiotic order, of information and the arrow of energetic ‘—motions’ of destruction defined by the 3rd postulate of illogic geometry*.*

– Finally Duality implies that all forms that evolve in time through 3 horizons, then organize in space those 3 horizons as the 3 regions of an i-point.

The number of events we can describe in all sciences departing from duality is enormous. Yet in as much as temporal information is dominant in living beings, illogic time is more important in biological and sociological sciences, explaining phenomena such as reproduction, perception, life and death, organic structures, etc. While, physical and cosmological particles can be described better with the use of Non-Euclidean, spatial geometry, as particles are dominant in spatial ‘—motions’. We will consider in the next chapters the most important biological applications of illogic time: the duality of Darwinian and symbiotic behavior; the way in which perception occurs; the concept of a top predator species, as information selects species with better brains; the palingenetic reproduction of biological forms which implies a dual travel in time back and forth from the future to the past…

But duality is only the beginning. Most systems evolve, self-combine and create finally a 3rd system, a reproductive one, becoming autonomous, without the need of ‘assemblers’ and ‘enzymes’. And then the game becomes richer in variations, because it becomes guided by ternary symmetries.

We understand those organic, self-reproductive systems according to the *Ternary Principle* studying the 3 *temporal ages* and functions of a ST field and then putting them together as the 3 *geometric, organic, spatial* regions of i- point. Since all ST field require 3 elements to exist: a Tƒ, informative element; an Es, energetic, spatial form, and an intermediate ‘present, simultaneous region’, dual flux of temporal ‘—motions’ that merges them into a whole. The result is an Sp-Tƒ rhythm of evolution and reproduction of forms in time that become latter reorganized as i-points in space, creating dual organic, real forms of temporal ‘—motions’. For example, the Universe first created fundamental particles, temporal quarks and spatial electrons that recombined into ST atoms; the body reproduces cells that latter evolve, becoming organs of ‘—motions’ and information, etc. Thus ST theory shows the complementarity between the ternary horizons of species that once have evolved energetic and informative particles interact creating an intermediate ST zone, shaping a new i- organism:

– Max. Sp: The external membrane and energetic network of the system that performs *‘—motions’ cycles*, transforming information into ‘—motions’, appears first: it is the cell’s fat membrane, the stars of the galaxy, the endodermic cells of the future digestive systems….

*-Max.Tƒ. Then it will appear the informative quanta of the future informative network and ‘brain’* of the system that perform *informative cycles*, transforming ‘—motions’ into information: they are the cells’ informative nucleotides, the black holes of the spiral galaxies, the brain.

– Sp x Tƒ: Finally the interaction of ‘—motions’ and informative systems creates *an intermediate, reproductive region that *combine ‘—motions’ and information: so protein membranes and nucleotide acids create the cell; stars and black holes create galaxies; the energetic endoderm and the informative ectoderm create the middle mesoderm region, each one the blue print of the future energetic, digestive, informative, nervous and blood, reproductive systems.

In formal terms we write the process as a decoupling of an initial *Sp x Tƒ form* that differentiates into a more energetic membrane (Max.Sp) and higher informative quanta (Max.Tƒ), that interact, creating the intermediate region, ST, shaping in this manner a new, ternary equation – the ultimate definition of any species. Since we are all self-repetitive MST field equations

The generator equation, Sp<ST>Tƒ, represents both: a temporal event between 2 relative ‘points’, an Œ-point with higher content of ‘—motions’ or relative past form, and an Œ-point with higher content of information or relative future form, that communicate implosive information (>) and explosive ‘—motions’ (<), through a wave of temporal ‘—motions’, <=>; c*reating a ternary, multicausal, simultaneous structure of spatial present*.

__Multi-functionality: 3 st-points functions. Ternary Principle:__

Creation happens due to the ‘diversification’ of any Space-time field in 3 subspecies in space or 3 ages in time; Sp, ST, Tƒ.

It is the ternary principle once and again written in the book of Nature, caused by the fact that there are only 3 elementary forms in the Universe, ‘—motions’, information and a combination of both. Thus, events, species and space-time fields, both in time and space, have 3 elements: *3 ages, 3 horizons, 3 dimensions or 3 physiological networks*, whose functions correspond to the arrow of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction that create the Universe. The Ternary principle is the origin of an evolutionary, impersonal plan of creation that diversifies species in all scales of reality into 3 forms, (Max. ΣSp, Max. Tƒ, ΣSp=Tƒ), from the 3 families of masses to 3 the types of Universes. It allows organizing all biological species in a tree of ternary horizons and differentiations of energetic, informative and balanced organisms, which co-exist in 3 st-scales of existence:

*‘Any form can be subdivided ad eternal in new ternary forms.’*

For example, the human body can be subdivided into 3 networks; then the digestive network can be subdivided into the stomach, liver and intestine system that can be subdivided into the colon, small, and large intestine, which can be subdivided into the left, top and right side, etc. The Ternary principle implies that the 3 spatial dimensions of any space-time field perform 3 temporal functions:

*‘Any species, which is part of an ecosystem or an organism, maximizes its survival developing 3 functions as an energetic, reproductive and informative system for the higher scale’*

I.e.: a cilia act as energetic limbs that move the cell, sensorial antennae that inform, and they evolved as centrioles that help to reproduce it. Hormones are also multifunctional.

And so on. This first rule of creation developed either in space as a topology of 4-dimensional reality with 3 elements, toroid ring, hyperbolic cycle and spherical plane, or in time as a game of ‘—motions’ that warps into information reproducing along the way, is your limit.

So the creator descends a notch more into self-appreciation since he is nothing but a contemplator of a game which has created before. That is he is created by the game and as assembler he is so determined to do one of the known-known combinations that, indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The isomorphisms of the game of creation are in themselves an entire sub-discipline of multiple space-times theory, studied in detail in my files. In essence the process is self-similar in all scales:

A species will differentiate in ternary sizes (its cellular, organic and social size); it will differentiate in ternary topologies (an species dominant in ‘—motions’, one in information and one in reproduction); in ternary ages (a neoteny species aborted in a palingenetic phase; one mature species and one with an excess of information, *which will become cell of a new scale of evolution, a superorganism communicated by the language); and* in ternary functions, symbiotic to the higher st+1 organism in which the entity exists (as an energetic part, an informative part and a reproductive part or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function).

Further on all those creative strategies of survival become more complex, when we consider its combinations: species with several functions, often in several scales; complementary, sexual specialization in an energetic, male entity and an informative, female entity; ternary structures that form complete topologies; open balls that act as doors between membranes, without center and membrane; a*nd combinatory varieties of ‘sexual species’ or ‘complementary’ species, in which the ‘—motions’/informative components, each diversify in 3 topologies, scales, ages, etc. *

Those combinations further enlarge the number of subspecies, though many of them, especially ‘anti-species’ in which the lesser informative ‘male’ plays an informative role and the lesser ‘energetic’ woman an energetic role (for example an antiparticle, with an energetic electron in its informative center and an informative proton in its energetic membrane), will not be stable and will not survive. This brings another essential law of creation, the inflationary nature of information checked by the isomorphisms of survival that extinguish unsuccessful species and tends to reduce the explosive age of creation to 3 ‘basic ternary differentiated’ types that survive, while other transitional or non-balanced combinations disappear:

*‘The Universe creates an inflationary number of ‘forms’ which are then reduced by natural selection to ternary species and balanced, complementary, dual systems’.*

# TIME ISOMORPHISMS.

**7th and 8th isomorphism: the worldcycles of 5D motions in space-time**

# 7TH: 3±∆ AGES OF TIME

**THE 3 ARROWS OF TIME, 3 organs of space and 3 scales put together.*** *

Now, a likely more easy to understand approach to the Universe and its Existential functions of space and time, comes from a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis in time of those existential beings. As in time, without their spatial elements, as beings of pure motion we can easily study the ‘3 ages’ of any change=motion of the Universe, and develop a causal analysis of it, parallel to the topological, spatial analysis we make of its forms.

Then we can consider the existence of 3 ‘arrows-ages-dimensions-properties’ of cyclical-time-motion-change:

< Sp: There are expansive, decelerating, entropic, lineal, past, energetic motions; followed by

≈ TS: Steady state, inertial, repetitive, wave-like, fixed speed, present åctions that combine and reproduce energy and information, completed by

And > Tƒ: Accelerating, informative, collapsing, future, formal, ordered motions

*Some of the main worldcycles of Nature, across several Universal Planes of the 5 ^{th} dimension, in the U±1 life scales of the human kind (biological, ∆-1, individual and ∆+1, social cultural scale), and the physical kind (thermodynamic, galactic and cosmic scales).*

In the graph, the life-death world cycle of beings, written in terms of ‘Spatial motion transfers between planes=energy’ and ‘form transfer between planes= information’.

In the life-death world cycle of beings, is where the concepts of energy and information, more complex, ‘scalar’, when compared, with spatial motions and forms localized in a single plane acquire its full meaning.

Information becomes synonymous of reproduction of form, which reaches its peak in the mature age of the being.

Energy becomes synonymous of the duality of life and death, the ∆-2 elements upgraded to reproduce the being, and the U-2 final descend into death.

*Now it is important to fully understand why death, which is an absolute release of energy happens downwards, in the thermodynamic scale, U-2: Since energy can be fully transferred downwards it is possible to jump two planes through death. On the other hand since information can be fully transferred upwards, it is possible to code the ∆+2 plane of existence departing from the molecular scale, as it happens in evolutionary arrows. *

We could say using a simile of physics that the U thermodynamic arrow is superconductive for energy, and the Tƒ scale is superconductor of information.

The reader can observe that matter also suffers also those 3 ages, known as states of matter, the gas, energetic state, the liquid, balanced, e=i state, and the solid informative state, between its birth as a plasma of ∆-1 particles and its extinction back to pure energy in atomic furnaces in stars, Sp=mc^{2}.

Now death has strictly ‘2 descending moments’ into the ST-2 Plane of existence as Energy, hence death is not truly the reversal ∆-1 of birth. Death is ST=2. So death of matter implies a explosion of gravitational and electromagnetic energy (Sp=Mc^{2}), and accordingly ‘physical energy’, ads a square of motion, a 2 dimensional expansion of ‘—motions’, instead of the ‘conserved’ Mv of momentum. Energy thus degrades in death the organism.

And in this manner the slow creation of life that rises in 2 stages matter into the organization of cells ∑∆-2>∆-1 and then the ∆-1>∆-emergence of life, descends twice into the moment of death.

For sake of simplification, and symmetry we write in many occasions only the U±1 seminal birth and network death, in the same manner physicians consider death merely the loss of the ∆-networks of Tƒ-information of the being, but strictly speaking we should write:

∆-2>∆-1: Seminal birth≈ ∑∆-1>∆ (fetus conception)<Spe-Energetic youth<≈ST-Reproductive age (∆+1)≈>Tƒ-Old age>∆-1 (network death) > ST-2 (cellular death)

That is the complete world cycle of life and death, across 5 planes of existence.

**The worldcycle of matter**

So happens to the world cycle of life and death of the Cosmos *with its two gravitational hyper-inflationary and electromagnetic* big-bang, death and birth of a new galaxy from a quasar (and maybe a local Universe) , which will then go through:

a young age of irregular galaxies made of stars in their nebulae (max. Sp)

The a spiral balanced S=T, steady state of liquid stars that reproduce atoms, S=T,

And end into a max. Tƒ- 3rd age of big- crunch – a collapse into white dwarfs or black holes of maximal Information.

Tƒ end in a dual death in a big bang.

**The world cycle of social civilizations.**

So do every biological being and society that evolves a human social super-organism and acquires technological information till it collapses into an energetic war that erases the culture, subconscious collective of the civilization into death.

**‘—motions’ and space as a ‘young, first age of a time cycle’.**

Einstein also said, ‘time curves space into mass’. So as time cycles go through, the lineal age of entropic big bangs, is transformed into mass. the true direction of the Universe is Sp->M, as time warps energy and expansive motion into form, information, 3rd age wrinkles and warped space-time.

And so we can better define spatial motion as the first slice of the time cycle that will shrink it, into a vortex of form as time goes through: energy will become imploded into a galactic vortex that will end into a fast black hole clock. Your energy of youth will wrinkle as you stay home informing yourself. This is the fundamental equation of time:

Se -> Tƒ. And so in yet another kaleidoscopic vision, we could express the Universe as a tug of war, between the 3 relative ages of time cycles:

Se (young energy age) -> Tƒ (old informative age), which tries to remain in the middle, Se=Tƒ (present, iterative, balanced age). So we talk of 3 ages of time:

Max. Se x Min Tƒ (young age) -> Se=Tƒ (reproductive, present, mature age) -> Min Se x Max. Tƒ (3rd, old informative age).

This development of the metric of the fifth dimension, which stays its maximal time in the mature present age, but for reasons studied in great detail in other posts, ends up finally corrugating itself, is the ultimate meaning of existence.

**Death vs. reproduction**

You live: Se -> Se=Tƒ-> Tƒ, and you try to elongate that world cycle of life as much as possible.

And then when you are pure Tƒ, pure black hole mass, Pure old being, the process reverses itself in an instant of death, an explosion that uncoils all the Tƒ, potential energy into kinetic energy:

M->Sp; Life-> death dissolution back to cellular pasts.

Now, the beauty of it, is that the Se->Tƒ arrow lasts a long life, and the Tƒ->Se death lasts very little.

And that is why we see a living Universe where death is a short big bang. We hardly any corpse around us, even if quantitatively there are as many corpses as living beings, they last far less.

Hence the importance of qualitative studies For example physicists do not understand why there are less antiparticles (which have reversed time equations, hence they are the death of particles) than particles. This is obvious. Because the antiparticle, the death reversal of the particle, lasts so little that on the total space-time product of the quantity x duration of them, they are hardly seen.

Se x Tƒ is far smaller for corpses and antiparticles than for life beings and particles.

They just do calculus on the quantitative Se numbers and hence they cannot figure it out. it is still one of the conundrums of physics.

It is a trivial solution once we can define properly the 3 arrows of time and affirm that *the Universe prefers the life arrow and makes it last much longer, but on the whole is immortal because the sum of particles and antiparticles, Sp and Tf, entropies and formal motions, lives and deaths, living and corpses are equal. And further on, it prefers the living and specially the living that reproduce themselves in the present, Sp x Tƒ; S=T, steady state of the system, which explains why it is an iterative fractal. The Universe as a fractal does generates constantly self-similar forms.*

Its purpose is to reproduce the essence of life its present Sp x Tƒ, S=T systems.

That is the mandate: grow and multiply through the 3 dimensions of a time cycle, spatial ‘—motions’ or youth, reproductive maturity or present and informative future or form, to die fast.

So we say that death happens in a relative single cycle/frequency/step of the whole entity, and life in the relative infinite sum of steps/frequencies/cycles of the whole being. And this ‘quantitative’ element, that death is a single quanta of time – either 1 or 3 π steps of the cycle – is essential to the quantitative models of physics, biology and history, even mysticism, as we shall see when we study the resurrection of civilizations through radiation of DNA-minds, called prophets.

Yes, that is also part of the 5th dimension, though i don’t bring it often because i know it will provoke a knee-jerk panic among our dearly quantitative scientists (-:

A single day for the body to die, but sometimes 3 day cycles for the whole pi as in the resurrection of Christ, as a radiation wave of thought in the mind of its disciples, transferred through the Wor(l)d the language that became God and inhabited among us, the saint spirit of the trinity, father, ∆+1 plane of the super organism of history, son, the DNA prophet and the world, the i-logon code that transferred it, ( I couldn’t help it sorry physicists 🙂

Now for you not to become mad at me, by including 5th dimensional theology, I will give you a bone of the ‘fire of the universe’. the big-bang lasted in its inflationary state, a single quanta of time, Planck’s time, and that was enough to fill up the local Universe (actually a quasar, it was only the galaxy that exploded, but that error of physicists should not be brought now here, when I’m trying to make them happy).

There was thus a single quanta of cosmic, gravitational time to provoke in the galactic quasar that lasted 13 billion years a gravitational wave that exploded all the mass of the galactic black hole. And that instant lasted only 10 up to minus 43 seconds. And then a new cycle of quasar life, tabulated by French astronomers into 10-20 billion years started again.

And a similar ratio of life-death happens in particles vs. antiparticles.

That is the charity of God, the fractal generator and its laws: eternity is there in the life of us and all our reproduced fractal forms, death is just the vaporization of our ego knot or mind-memory into a flat bidimensional surface of kinetic energy, which will resurrect again.

But how we do measure a time quanta? according to the metric of the 5^{th} dimension, it is the length of the cycle of our ∆-1 cellular/atomic/quanta elements.

A day is the time of reproduction of a cell, hence the quanta of time of the larger being, and the quanta of death.

The gravitational plane (not the light-space of the body of the galaxy, but the gravitational plane of its masses, black holes and quarks) is made of strings. The reproductive bit of a string that moves by reproducing along a path of space-time at the speed of light, is the Planck’s time.

Strings are properly defined – without the errors of Newtonian background space-time, with a better understanding of its 10 dimension across 3 planes of space, time, with its definition not as rubber strings but rather as a liquid with enormous surface tension, which move through reproduction, technical matters that should not matter to you unless you are a string theorist (-; are the ultimate ‘cyclical clocks of time – closed strings’ and ‘—motions’ of reproductive space of the gravitational Universe. masses, quarks and black holes NOT light-space, are made of strings.

They are one of the two fundamental physical ‘quanta’ of the Universe. And so a ‘reproductive cycle of a string’, which moves by reproducing its vibrational wave along a lineal path, at the bit of 10 minus forty three seconds was all what needed the galaxy to die. And a day, the reproductive cycle of your cells is what you will need to die.

Because as we have said life is a reproductive wave. All is reproduction. When a wave moves through space it reproduces its form. When reproduction ceases, death happens.

Thus we could redefine death now not in terms of the arrow of ‘—motions’-past, but on terms of the arrow of reproduction:

Death is the last reproductive cycle of your cells/quanta that sustain your self.

Then once the ∆-1 plane no longer reproduces. The ‘second death’ is its explosive big-bang, dissolution, which lasts a bit more… The entire pi cycle of full åctions of the being, a cryptic concept that is too far away on your knowledge for understanding now – the 3 days the corpse takes in smelling rotten, the longer big-bang period of the galaxy. So the total death is:

∆->Tƒ-1 (last beat of existence at cellular level) -> ∆-2 (entropic death).

And so now we can return to the first sentence that defined the Universe, as a ‘fractal system made of planes of space and cyclical time’:

As all fractals, it has a Dimensional* Generator Equation*, which combines,** ‘X’** those 2 elements:

Space, broken in infinite quanta of ‘lengths’ with motion (or ‘‘—motions’’), **‘Se’.**

And cyclical clocks of time, which carry its information in the frequency and form of its cycles: ‘**Tƒ**‘,

to create through a series of iterations, **‘∑’.**

a series of ‘constant’, **C, **physical and biological systems, species and Magnitudes,** ‘∆’,** that put together form the puzzles of forms and motions, that we call the Universe, **U.**

And because it is a fractal those puzzles have an inner structure in i-layers, which are different for each species but for the biggest, whole Fractal, the Universe is a structure of 9 logarithmic scales (since each new scale is made of ±10¹º smaller elements.

This simple sentence thus resumes the whole Universe as the sum of an infinite number of relative worlds, which are structured with the same laws of the whole, resumed in the Generator Equation of the Universe:

U = ∑ W: ∑Se ≥ x ≥ Tƒ = ST±4

Meaning that the universe is made of infinite fractal worlds, ∑W that combine Limbs/fields of energy: Se, and heads/particles of information, Tƒ, into hyperbolic, reproductive bodies/waves, X, which exchange between the two poles Se, Tƒ, flows of energy, or expansive, entropic motion, ≤, and flows of information, or implosive, rotary motion, ≥, in ‘stable, balanced’ dynamic structures, defined by a series of Universal constants of repetitive åctions, ST across U±4 planes of relative existence.

‘—motions’ and form combine into repetitive constant fields which suffer a life and death cycle around an exi=st, balanced field of liquid existence. The consistency, present, repetitive presence of the Universe is due to the reproductive, e=i, cycle.

It is what maintains the Universe constant, even if each of those exi=st-ences will go through the life-death cycle, of 3 ages, obtained as a result of the constant accelerations and decelerations we submit the function, which are finally ordered in 3 ages (another question though is to consider which degree of freedom to move the future-form or the past-energy zones of life-death evolution is possible).

In brief, we are born with an existential momentum, M(Tƒ) xV(Se)≈ ST, but the system is not in the balanced ST point of existence for very long but rather follows a ternary evolution, ∂ST/∂Tƒ x ∂ST/∂V >=<0 of 3 ages of life to extinction in a relative, Se(x)/Tƒ(y)/ST coordinates

This is the point of departure of the mathematical and logic formalism of the 5th dimension, which humans have been observing since their discovery of telescopes and microscopes, but was not properly formalized, beyond the philosophical models of relational space-time of Leibniz and the insights of Einstein in the multiplicity of time clocks of the Universe.

We exist in a Universe made of infinite beings composed of spatial motions (seen often as fixed distances), ‘**Se’**, in which certain cyclical clock-like cycles ‘Tƒ’ repeat, reproduce its åctions, ‘ST’, with a constant frequency , giving birth to 3 type of complex 2-manifolds of space-time, (toroid, entropic long limbs/fields x Informative, cyclical, tall heads/particles, combined in hyperbolic iterative waves-bodies) which assembly into organisms** **during a finite period, its ‘world cycle’ of life and death.

So we talk of a simple mystical taoist function:

‘The Function of Existence (Ch’ang: Se x Tƒ=ST) is not the obvious form, it is the combination (imprinting) of yin-information-order (Tƒ) over Yang-’—motions’-energy-disorder (Se) that generates the 10 thousand beings’

**Cyclical Time imprinting energetic space, creating complementary systems of relational, fractal space-time.**

And we can consider any biological organism to be made of a Head (Tƒ) x Limb (e) ≈ Body (ST)

Now systems are limbs/fields that transfer energy to ST-bodies/waves and heads/particles that transfer information, and both together are reproduced into seeds of new limbs/bodies/heads, fields/waves/particles. This is what the Universe does, generate space-time waves, with energy, information and its ‘speed of reproduction’:

Se x Tƒ = ST, ExI=ST_{U±4, }Spe<ST>Tƒ; Max. Sp -> S=T > Min. Tƒ…. and many other equations we will find in this web express the same concept, which however – and that is the difficulty and beauty of understanding all the varieties of a fractal – adopts many similar forms. In the graph we see a simple one: A Planckton, an H-photon, in which making Tƒ, ƒ, the frequency of form one, can be defined by some simple equations: Sp=H(ƒ:1)=MC^{2}, is the simplest ones.

The generator equation must therefore be interpreted for each plane of space-time, each variety of species of ‘‘—motions’ in space (‘—motions’+ energy) and O-Time cycles that carve space into forms; and ≈ Waves and bodies that combine and reproduce both.

In logic terms, the easiest way to express all this is with the 3 arrows of time, symmetric to them: Past-Young-’—motions’-Energy-lineal space x Future-information, form, old age = Present, repetition, reproduction of bodies and waves.

Since past is indeed a world with lesser form, future the old age of information and in between each system of the Universe goes through 3 life ages, of a worldcycle of time:

But why Physicists only study ‘—motions’ or motion change, and therefore unaware and unable to understand form, informative change affirm that the Universe will die, expand and increase its motion?

Again, because when the first physicists invented the first equation with time and a variable, he wrote an equation of motion, and ever since, all physical definitions of time derive from that simple Galilean V=S/T equation, where time is defined as a parameter of speed and space, of motion, of the 2 sides of the Galilean paradox NOT as an equation of change in form, which is the equation we shall introduce in the 5th paradigm and will define all the life-death cycles of change of form of the Universe.

How Se and Tƒ, ‘past lineal disordered motions or ‘—motions’’, and ‘future informative, cyclical clocks with ordered motions or forms’ combine to reproduce the infinite constant varieties of individual body-waves, ST, of the complex ternary Universe is the deepest scientific knowledge we can achieve.

How fractal space=yang, and time=yin, merge and create ‘existences’.

And all civilizations with different languages, have tried as the Taoist/Buddhist/Hindi, did with the duality of yin=Vishnu and yang=Shiva, to explain the duality of the informative, creative, orderly and energetic, entropic, disordered, life and death, mass and speed sides of all systems mean.

Those cyclical åctions have a fundamental nature, as the word ‘cycle’ implies, they are repeated in time with a frequency, ƒ, which determine the speed of the cycle. And so the Universe truly is a game that ‘draws’ fractal, frequently, ƒ=Tƒ, time cycles, forms that carry in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, over surfaces of |-entropic, expansive, lineal, disordered space…

Each of us is also a bunch of energetic motions molded by cyclical åctions, we repeat every day that we perceive once a second, with our eyes, feed once a day, make love once a week and life and die by repeating certain cycles. But how to classify those cycles? How to study its freedom or patterns of order? How to relate them to our human deformed perception of existence, how to compare with the cycles of other beings? Those are themes of the philosophy of science of relational space-time, which are also worth to study.

## 8th isomorphism: ∞ worldcycles.

**ω**

In the graph, the world cycle of existence divides in 3 ages that divide in 8 phases, between birth and extinction, in which the 3 physiological networks that make the being, $t-limbs, ∑∏-reproductive networks and ð§-informative networks, are either in its Spatial, static, (–) or moving-active (__) state.

This was only understood partially (as the order is not proper neither in the old or the young circle) in the taoist tradition, so we use the symbols of the 8 ‘BAGUAS’:

After the informative Generation (in black), as a seed in the placenta in the Human T.œ, which *being of a lower scale in space, ∆-1, has a decametric faster speed in time. So instead of 9 years it is a period of 9 ‘moons’=months of gestation, the being is born emerging to live in the ∆º scale where it will go through 8 phases for a *72 years human generational cycle. And each age distinguishes itself for the spatial static or active, temporal stage of its 3 physiological networks, reflected in the trigrams, from above (particle-head), to the middle body wave to the lower moving limbs/potentials.

YOUTH

In man they are the babyhood 0-9, when only the limbs are activated, it is the ‘thunder’ age in the taoist tradition.

Then after 9, till 18, the childhood, age of reason starts and the mind also activates. It is the age of flame.

Finally the whole being becomes activated in the adolescence, it is the age of Heavens, between 18 and 27 – the zenith of the organism.

MATURITY

Then starts the second phase of the cycle, or maturity, when the system reproduces and the mind quiets to become responsible and carry the family. It is the lake phase, from 27 to 36… followed by…

The wind age, from 36 to 45, when the limbs loose its power, and quiet down, but the mind reaches its ‘acne’ age of maximal lucidity, which the greeks considered its plenitude… followed by…

The water age, the last age when sexuality is still active, but the mind starts its decline, from 45 to 54… followed by the…

Mountain age, when both limbs and body become static, from 54 to 63… Only the mind is living… to Finally close the life cycle from…

63 to 72… back to Earth, converted in dust of space-time…

In the moment of Entropic death, the last months of our world cycle now becoming a zero-sum when again we ‘move’ in a thunder, but not of birth but rather a big-bang of dissolution, and explosion of our static spatial in-form-ation, to return to the womb of ‘Tao’, the game of existence…

The 8th baguas, combinations of 3 physiological networks in two states, static space/form — and moving time __ yang, gives us 8 sub-ages of a world cycle. It was the highest taoist understanding of I Ching – the game of time-changes that define the world cycles of past-present-future of all systems as a potential block of similar phases: despite the fact that its individual forms approaches ∞ all of them go through the same phases as they define the states of its 3 networks. So we can apply the 8 baguas from the phases of physical gaseous-liquid-solid states, to the decades of life, to sociology to war to stock cycles…

**∞ Worldcycles of existence.**

The 8th isomorphism, an infinite erected symbol, for the infinite fractal worldcycles of existence of all beings, returns all of us to the reproductive essential element of existence, an in its diversifications, brings all the events again as the worlcycle did all together.

So we have for any individual being, all the information that establish its world cycle of existence as the natural order of its 5 DIMENSIONAL motions in time (±∆ST), whereas we add the motion of dissolution and death, which is not internal to the being, and hence it is not seen as an action of existence, but imposed by the external networks and cycles the being performs for the higher ∆+1 system.

** **

Well, now i’ve apparently got to explain this to an 11 year old 😦 Wish me luck.

(-; much easier than relativity