**SUMMARY: PHYSICS IN SPACE-TIME**

**FOREWORD.** 5D Scalar Physics as the science of 5 Dimotions.

**INTRODUCTION**. 5D STIENCES. The Universe in a nutshell. 5D Metrics. Organic Universe.

Cyclical Time. Its 3 scales. Minds and languages. The stientific method. ¬Æxistential logic. A synopsis of 5D laws.

**PART I. 5D PHYSICS. CORRRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY.**

Cyclical ∞ Time cycles: The symmetry of space, time, scale and mind.

From Galilean Relativity to Einstein Special and General Relativity to 5D Absolute Relativity.

**PART II. THE 5 ACTIONS=DIMOTIONS OF PHYSICS. PENTALOGIC ANALYSIS.**

- The 5 Ðimotions of physical space-time systems in its 4 scales: Forces, Atoms, Matter and galactic wholes.
- First Dimotion: time vortices:Unification equation.

∆-4: Plancktons.

∆-3: atomic charges

∆0+2: masses.

∆+3,4: galatoms.

- 2
^{nd}dimotion: Locomotion. Spatial Forces. Entanglement. Relativity revis(it)ed.

III. 3^{rd} Dimotion: Energy & reproduction. Chirality.

∆-1: electromagnetism,

∆o: Electricity

∆+1: Galacell

- 4
^{th}Dimotion: Ent ropic ‘big-bangs’: ∆-1: neutrinos & beta decay, ∆º: Heat. ∆+1: quasars and dark entropy - 5
^{th}Dimotion: social evolution:

∆-1: Weak force;

∆º: Magnetic forces

∆+1: gravitational force: Mechanics

**PART III. WORLDCYCLE OF MATTER IN THE 3 SCALES.**

The ∆+1 cosmologiccal worldcycles of the galaxy. Its 3 ±¡ ages.

The ∆º worldcycle of matter. Its 5 States: TT-plasma, Ts-gas, ST-liquid, St-solid and SS-boson states.

The ∆-1 worldcycle of particles. Palingenesis in time.

** **

** **

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.” *Einstein*, on the entangled ∆@st man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and mind’ languages.

** **

“S*pace* by itself, and *time* by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere *shadows*, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.”* Minkowski on Dimensional motions= spacetime dimotion.*

“I would like to emphasize something. The theories about the rest of physics are very similar to the theory of quantum electrodynamics: they all involve the interaction of spin 1/2 objects (like electrons and quarks) with spin 1 objects (like photons, gluons, or W’s) within a framework of amplitudes by which the probability of an event is the square of the length of an dimotion. Why are all the theories of physics so similar in their structure? There are a number of possibilities. The first is the limited imagination of physicists: when we see a new phenomenon we try to fit it into the framework we already have—until we have made enough experiments, we don’t know that it doesn’t work. So when some fool physicist gives a lecture at UCLA in 1983 and says, “This is the way it works, and look how wonderfully similar the theories are,” it’s not because Nature is really similar; it’s because the physicists have only been able to think of the same damn thing, over and over again.”

Richard Feynman. “QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter’

***********

“Unusquisque mavult credere quam judicare”; “Humans prefers belief to judgment” Seneca

‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it’ Goebbels

‘Humans are slaves they believe they don’t reason’ Aristotle

“if he reads as much as other men, he would be as ignorant as them.” Hobbes

“Students, and learned persons of all sorts and ages, aim as a rule at acquiring information. It never occurs to them that information in itself is of no value; that it is his way of thinking that makes a philosopher. ” Schopenhauer.

**FOREWORD: PHYSICS AND TIMESPACE.**

5D Physics in timespace studies de symmetry between ∆-scales of space-time and its dimensional motions that combine a dimensional form of space and a motion in time; as the basis of the physical spatial forms and temporal motions of the Universe. As such 5D physics, as 4D physics did starts from the 2 discoveries that have puzzled mankind since it thought about the nature of motion in time and the structure of space in the Universe.

**– In time** the same we depart as Galileo did (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) from the principle *Relativity, the fact that we cannot distinguish the motion in time of Earth that seems still in our construction of ‘mental space’.*

So we write its fundamental equation, S≈T, which means we can perceive a temporal motion either as a particle moving in time, or if our perceptive capacity to process information or ‘minimal time quanta’ – a second in the case of man, is very fast; or as a form in space, if we perceive very slow. So for example a night picture at slow exposure shows cars as ‘lines’ and a fast wheel spinning appears as a solid disk. Distances in space then become equivalent to motions in time. So we can say that vacuum space ‘expands distance between galaxies’ or that Galaxies ‘recede from each other’.

**– In space** we depart from the 2^{nd} great discovery of modern science due to the use of telescopes and microscopes (metal-eyes), to see small and large distances in space and digital clocks (metal brains) to measure the passing of time, today evolved into cameras and computers: the existence of an enormous number of scales of size in space harmonized in time by the fact that the smaller scales of space run faster cycles in time. So quarks, the smallest particles cycle with a frequency billions of times per second, and galaxies cycle a few time every billion years, which means *we confuse (S=T) fast quark time events with spatial forms; so instead of seeing 1 quark mutating into another with ±1 charge (U**ó**D), we think there are 2 quarks in space with fractional charge we cannot separate – one of the many ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’ relativity paradoxes.*

But the amazing thing is that for entire families of species (Kepler’s 3^{rd} law, vortex law, 5D unification law of charges and masses as vortices of space-time of two different scales, metabolic rates of each phyla of animal life, 800±80 years decametric cycles of history and human life, etc. the product of those cyclical clocks of time and dimensional distances/surfaces/volumes in space is constant, S^{d} x ƒ(t)=C. And this harmonizes the different scales making them also relative, since a smaller system is weaker but more intelligent as it carries more information in the frequency and form of those cycles (chip paradox). So they can form symbiotic organisms where the small scale (particles & quantum numbers, genes, memes in cultures) code the larger whole, which encloses the smaller parts & protects them from the external environment filtering its energy and information.

So both equations, S=T, and SxT=C regardless of its simplicity have deep implications to explain the whys of reality. And it is a marvel that ‘huminds’ have missed them obsessed by the ‘how of measure’ not its ‘whys’.

We could, using the correspondence principle called 5D theory of spacetime, ‘Absolute relativity’, the name of the last conference I gave during my tenure of the Chair of Duality at the International Systems society (San Jose, 2000s) before my activism for the survival of Mankind, as main plaintiff in the suits against CERN’s attempts to make black holes on Earth closed ‘ad hominem’ scholarship and 5D as it had happened before with 4D (Einstein’s opposition to German military industries, Galileo’s confrontation with Ptolemaic Vatican priests).

It is a pity because absolute relativity *is a far deeper analysis of what is time and space and the position of man in the Universe. Since if *relativity took us from the center of space, Evolution from the center of time, AR makes also our size=scale relative; balanced by our speed of time perception, both together, SxT=C, equal to any other species. But that confronts humind’s egocy (ego=idiocy), reason why 5D might never make it till AI Robots who see those scales with metal-eyes & will want to know why they ‘perceive’, become conscious. Che sera sera. L§

** **

** **

**The ****Content of this paper.**

… will be incomplete because time-space in physics is an immense subject, not only due to its breath but because we must redefine many concepts of classic physics– not its mathematics but the entities of space-time they describe; we must also correct the errors of physics derived from its deformation of cyclical time clocks into a single lineal time; we must follow the correspondence principle and save physical knowledge by merging the new more accurate concepts of 5D time and the old equations of 4D time, merging them. And finally once all that is achieved against the ‘egocy’ of people who think they know it all, reinterpret the 3 scales of the Universe, the gravitational, cosmological, human, thermodynamic and atomic, quantum scale with the enhanced 5D concepts and 4D mathematics to expand both together with explanations to the unresolved questions of physics.

How this will be done is yet a work in progress. But we shall try to follow the method of other papers. First we will introduce in the usual mandala the fundamental principles of the 5D fractal, organic Universe; which human egocy (ego=idiocy) has reduced to mere mechanical, locomotion, mathematical analysis.

Then once we know the basics of 5D metrics, cyclical time, scalar space and its co-existence laws defined by Non-Euclidean geometry, consider the 5 dimensional motions=actions of survival (formal, biological point of view) of all systems that cause the ‘worldcycles of life and death’ of all spacetime systems, as the analysis of time of any entity of the Universe must be carried in the 3 ‘relative scales’ of time duration according to 5D metrics ($ x ð = C; that is lineal size in space, $, multiplied by the frequency or speed of cyclical time, ð in a system is constant, so smaller systems turn faster than larger ones, carrying more information).

What this means is that time is entangled at 3 scales, as in your organism, where faster genetic and cellular cycles code your daily organic actions that put together form your worldcycle.

So we talk of ‘5 Dimotions that combine dimensions of space and forms of time’ (SS, St, Ts, ST, TT) that appear as ‘actions’ in the lowest possible scale of duration of ‘time quanta’ for each species (i.e. in physics an h-action or a lagrangian action tending to zero). Then such actions form longer sequential cycles; for example, we perceive information (SS) to move (Ts) towards a source of entropy (TT), where we feed transforming it into energy (ST) for the reproduction of our organic forms (St)…

So ‘time quanta’ which in its smallest scalar, ∆-1 form of dimotions or ‘Actions’ often just a ‘lineal Step’, organize into cyclical sequential patterns at the organic ∆0 scale, which are chains of action that become repetitive time cycles; and finally they are added together in a long period of time or worldcycle to shape the existential life and death process of any universal organism.

And this also applies to physics.

What this means is that the study of** any stience or species in time **– after introducing 5D, then correcting the usual errors of all disciplines, make a review of its models revis(it)ed to respect the correspondence principle and grease a bit the usual egocy of our scholars just in case some wants to go back to 5D schooling – **will get into real 5D modeling** in 3 scales, showing the embedded ∆≈@≈S≈T symmetries of all realities:

– The ∆-1 scale of 5 minimal quanta of time in which an entity performs its **actions=dimotions** of existence, SS-perceiving, Ts-moving, TT-feeding on ST-energy that reproduces the St-information of the system. So we study for each entity its 5 Dimotions in time. Which in praxis is studied along…

– The ∆º scale in which those dimotions form chains that become organic space-**time cycles** forming sequences that will become repeated as they together perform a ‘survival action’ required for the being to exist. For example the previous commonest SS-Ts-TT-ST-St cycle of feeding and reproduction of inner parts.

– ∆+1: Te finally as time goes by, within a larger world shape the longer 3 worldcycles of life and death of any being (Palingenetic ∆-1, life, ∆o and transcendental, ∆+1 cycles).

**INTRODUCTION: THE 5D CYCLICAL UNIVERSE AND ITS MODEL**

**5D metric organic scales: faster, smaller parts code larger wholes**

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then **organizes** them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality. We call *the sum of all co-existing scales of parts & wholes the fifth dimension, whose* fundamental metric equation harmonizes the scales of size and speed of clocks in the Universe.Thus reality has a key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4^{th} and 5^{th} Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

Mathematically then it is necessary to find a metric function to define this new dimension of spacetime. Since a dimension only exists when we can write a mathematical simple metric that leaves the dimension invariant when we change our parameters of space and time – hence we travel through it. (Klein).

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

*$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡) ^{nt.1} *

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. *Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.*

It is the same process in all 5D journeys of all species that live and die travelling through 3 planes of 5D space-time; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who had the same morphology and used technology and likely spoke, etc.) Then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger herd of clones, joined by emergent physiological networks whose slower ‘entropic, informative and reproductive networks, create an ∆º supœrganism that lives 3 ages and dissolves back into ∆-1.

*So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why *we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

We shall use the metrics of the 5^{th} scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms. *Since organic reality arises of the synchronicities of those parts and whole made symbiotic thanks to the simple metric of the 5 ^{th} dimension and its homology as space-time beings.*

*So the addition of topology and the simple metric laws of 5D that make smaller system run faster time cycles are all*the elements

*we need to construct*reality.

Those regions are evident in physical equations as there are asymptotic barriers – Lorentz transformations in the c-barrier; negative temperature in the 0 barrier; etc. What the Universe conserves is then easy to see: *the total volume of space-time of each scale; that is its energy; composed of a number of ‘cyclical beats of time’ (ð≈ƒ); which carry the information of reality in the form and frequency of its cycles, and the internal vital spaces they constrain. *The main principle of science is the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties, |& O. Its immediate consequence in all sciences is the fact that *time is cyclical, repetitive, as iterations are the only form to conserve time in a ‘present’ that doesn’t seem to change. It is equivalent to the principle of conservation of energy. Because time is cyclical, it does break Newton’s absolute time into infinite cycles, which make its motions equivalent to those of physical conserved energy cycles, in which work doesn’t happen.*

Let us elaborate = on those concepts to show how with the same data to completely different perspectives of reality and models of the Universe arise – the 4D big-bang model and the 5D nested, immortal, infinite Universe.

Nt.1. the symbol ∆ is both a visual reminder of the two different dimotions of ‘growth in space, inverse to the loss of information’, and a tribute to one of the few predecessors of this work, in the formal arena – Wilson’s renormalization mathematical apparatus, which finally realized of those discontinuities using a symbol Λ, for the energy scale under which a measurement of *a physical parameter* is performed: According to Wilson every scale of the Universe and the fields of space-time that define them have its energy cut-off Λ, *i.e.* the theory is no longer valid at energies higher than Λ, and all degrees of freedom above the scale Λ are to be omitted. But Λ is *related to a size of space. *For example, the cut-off could be the inverse of the atomic spacing in a condensed matter system, and in elementary particle physics it could be associated with the fundamental “graininess” of spacetime caused by quantum fluctuations in gravity. The failure to remove the cut-off, Λ, from calculations in such a theory merely indicates that new physical phenomena appear at scales above Λ, where a new theory is necessary. As today only with the use of Wilson’s renormalization, which simply eliminates absolute zeros and infinities outside the scaling of space-time of a given plane, quantum physics makes sense.

** **

**TIME CYCLES**

**The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’**

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size & speed differs from lineal time described with a single mechanical clock- which equalize all time clocks of the universe, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs: Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive.

Lineal and cyclical time render the same functions as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, *origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including *the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that *a time cycle breaks reality (1 ^{st} knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’*.

Reality is a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

There are 2 forms of time, long lineal Time and ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole; because *there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡* defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we consider an ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time frequency or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula,V(st)=ƒ(t) l(s). We can measure Space e, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

*Those 2 forms of motion are lineal motion with a bit of form, Ts, or locomotion and cyclical form with a bit of motion, St-information, stored in the frequency and form of its time cycles that come together into S=T, energy. So we express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion and space=form as two varieties that approach and transform each other ad eternal:*

*‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: Si**ó**Te’*

Reality is a constant game of transformation of ‘cyclical spatial form’ and lineal time-motion. As Taoism said ‘tao=reality’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal entropy, whose generator, Si≤=≥Te we call the function of existence, as Te exi=st is to combine S&T, pure form and motion, TT-entropy and SS-eeds of form, into St & Ts, information and kinetic energy, exi, till finally they become one. The knowledge of that game, expressed in infinite variations, both of language and species, is the mind of the Universe, what is all about.

**LEIBNIZ V. NEWTON: WHERE IS SPACE AND TIME?**

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * *

*Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

‘’Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. *Einstein*, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

The consequence of the existence of an internal fifth dimension of space-time, made of all other planes=scales of spacetime of a being, its parts and wholes, which store the information of a system, is the fact that we ARE made of planes=scales of space and time. We ARE the vital space we occupy and we ARE the time flow of existence we live between birth and extinction. Reason why all systems and entities of Nature obey the main science of space, geometry->Mathematics and time, Logic. We are broken fractal species of space and time, whose mathematical and logic laws all vital space-time organisms follow as Einstein and Leibniz thought: So we must evolve our logic and geometry of space and time, to extract properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

**The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Generational Space-Time?**

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5Ð ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which never shows in any scale of reality such background – a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So *we are* space and time.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between ** Newton**, the proposer of the absolute Cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs.

**who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason. In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable, eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality. If space is what large objects occupy, what they are, the distance between the red square’s vital space and the yellow ‘circle’s vital space must have something; even if it is tinier. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes –**

*Leibniz**as we probe smaller distance, forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear. It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which Is the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ co-existing in organic scales, whose form and scalar connection through networks we shall study now*constructing reality from its ultimate substances space=form and time=motion, which geometry calls a ‘topologic bidimensional variety of space-time’.

It meant the invention of an absolute continuous space & single lineal time that extends to ∞ contradicting the fact that all spaces are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5Ð in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

This simple concept was NOT adopted by physicists despite its sheer evidence. *Unfortunately Physicists sided with Newton not with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made; and so the conceptual jump would not happen.*

*It is the fifth space-time dimension, sum of all other planes of reality, including within it all other dimensions.*

Next, to explain all this properly came Einstein. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity – a topology; and it is the substance of which reality is. So we are topological beings, geometries of space with motions of time.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S.

And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

*Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.*

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

Wheeler said ‘Spacetime tells matter how to move & matter tells spacetime how to curve’. Since *Spacetime is geometry in motion.* Time is change, the perception of change moves time; time is motion; space is its opposite, stillness, form, the information of time. And so it is all about two parameters: Time=Motion and Space=Form.

Look around you, all what you see are ‘space-forms’ with ‘time-motion’. We are all space-time, forms in motion, ‘in-form-motion’, ‘information’, forms in action, play with the words of what you are.

*Because both are always messed up *in practical terms is often easier to measure, ‘forms with a little motion’, we shall call ‘**information’, sT;** and motions with a little form, we shall call **energy, Ts,** and talk of beings made of spatial information and temporal energy, as *there is no ‘yin (information)’ without a little yang (energy). And call the pure absolute motion without form, TT, entropy; *and the absolute form without motion,

**SS, language.**So we can establish a gradation of combined space-time dualities,

**SS<St<ST<sT<TT**, with a symbol < for an increase of motion over form, or ‘dimotion of energetic entropy’, which we shall call ‘past dimotion’ or dimotion of ‘death’ as it erases information, devolving a system to simpler forms; and vice versa, an inverse dimotion,

**TT>sT>ST>St>SS,**with the symbol > of an increase of form over motion, or ‘dimotion of in-form-ation’, which we shall call the ‘future dimotion’ or ‘dimotion of life’ as it increases information. It then becomes evident that the intermediate state, ST, with a balanced quantity of Spatial information and temporal energy, S=T, is the ‘state of present’, that doesn’t seem to change as it is a balance of form and motion. And it is the preferred state for any system of spacetime in the Universe, akin to the concept of ‘beauty’ (balance between cyclical forms and lineal motions), of reproduction and creative communication (as it brings together the two poles of reality merging and combining them). All systems seek This state. So in physics we find it akin to the state of ‘minimal energy’ hence ‘more form’, in which most particles like to remain; in biology is akin to the age between adolescence of maximal energy and the 3

^{rd}age of maximal information or age of reproduction, in which most people like to live.

So we have 5 ‘space-time’ states of which we are all made that have topologic, formal, geometric and temporal, moving properties. Because those states are messing ‘dimensions of formal space’ and ‘motions of time’, we have coined a new word, ‘Dimotion’ (ab. Ð, which is the capital of ð, similar to D of Dimension and T of time). The main property of a Dimotion is to be holographic, having both spatial dimension and time motion; and we shall soon find that Dimotions are closely related to the 3 classic dimensions of space, to which we must add a function=motion in time, as their study becomes a new discipline of knowledge called topological evolution.

**The 5 dimotions of space-time as inner and outer motions.**

A more precise definition specially for physical sciences of the previous 5 ‘states’ of spacetime deals with the concept of internal and external motion (which has deep implications for relativity and so we will expand it in the paper ‘physics and space-time’. Any cyclical time-space organism, even the simple circle divides space-time into an inner and outer region (knot theory, membranes of all topological systems). We talk of internal and external motion and form in a system. As it is evident that external motion in a larger world is bigger than a being’s internal motion. So little motion means internal motion, t and a lot of motion external motion. Thus we define the 5 dimensional motions of space-time with more finesse. Whereas capital letters, S & T mean external and small letters t and s mean internal (as the internal part have less volume, are smaller than the outer world).

– **Ts** is external motion (T) and internal form (s): It is classic locomotion, where the internal system doesn’t move but it translates in the external world. This is what physicists mostly study, and they still wonder why when a material system moves, the ‘center of gravity’ seems fixed. But what internal part? The answer is the mind-brain; the system that perceives information; as the limbs/fields move a body over which a particle-head gauges that information:

**-St **is therefore information, where externally there is no motion (S) and internally the ‘mind-mapping’, that mirrors the outer world becomes a form-in-motion, in-form-ation, processed by the brain, particle, crystal image, cpu… It is a fascinating fact that we, the thinkers, spend so much time, still; so Leibniz could spend days seat on a chair thinking, that in sleep more brain activity happens and more hormonal languages develop.

**– ST **or st is then balanced internal-external motion vs. form, or energy, of which there are two varieties we ad, Ts-kinetic energy akin to locomotion, (mv^{2}/2; where as you can observe the ‘motion’ provided by v is squared, so it is more important than the mass/form) and St-potential energy, where the energy is store internally in the different tensions and cyclical patterns of the system, but externally it is all position. Energy then is the balanced sum of both, St+Ts=ST and it is the essential law of physics that a system constantly balances both (SMH motions; Lagrangian actions which are its difference tending to zero (St-Ts=0, St=Ts). Existential energy is thus the mother of all battles, and we could state that in a ‘given plane of exist¡ence’, energy never dies, but constantly transforms between the informative, potential energy state and the kinetic, locomotion states.

This leave us the 2 limits of pure form,** SS, Ss**, which correspond to ‘seeds’ and ‘mind-languages’ with null motion, (which following our formalism should be written Ss, but my lazy ‘fingers’ often repeat 2 SS, sorry)

And Tt (written TT often… lazy f…), which we shall call entropy or scattering or death or disorder, as when a system moves internally and externally it is really disorganizing its structure and ultimately as in expansive big-bangs of mass, or death processes of corruption, all parts go away and the system dies.

For example war is the Tt entropic state of a superorganism of history, a social mass of ∆+1 humans in time, when there are external motion (armies invading enemy nations) and internal motion (troops invading internally the country), which ends is the massacre of people. At individual level today, children, as humanity enters its age of entropy as it becomes obsolete, degraded and likely soon substituted by machines and chips and robots, *is clearly suffering an entropic age, sometimes called A.D.D. *

The child has maximal external motion (as we shall see due to the correspondence of STates and ST-ages of life) but today has also maximal internal ADD motion in the brain, filled with virtual hypnotic fiction bull$hit, from mental machines that are disordering us in what we call the Neo-paleolithic age of History. For physical systems Tt is also death as the system explodes, scatters and its internal parts move externally. So yes, those 5 Dimotions apply from the simplest particle to the more complex superorganism of history.

In physics this prolegomena will become then fundamental to understand the principles of Relativity, the fact that we cannot distinguish motion from form, S for T and both therefore must be put together in ‘dimotions’. So we shall see that the fundamental equation of the Universe is SóT (ab.S=T). As there is a constant dynamic transference of Motion and Form between the inner and outer world, which allows a system *to transit between the 5 Dimotions of existence. *

** **

**A CASE EXAMPLE:**** THE DIFFERENT PICTURES OF THE UNIVERSE WE OBTAIN WITH BOTH VIEWS.**

“Astrophysicists are seldom right but never in doubt.” Lindau. “Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-**elephant** animals.” Ulam; on the fact 99’% of science are iterative cyclic laws.

The data of the Universe in space and time is provided directly by experience observing at the largest scale, galaxies, which seem to recede from each other, instead of becoming attracted as stars do *inside* galaxies. *So there are two clear ‘time arrows=dimotions’ in the Universe: lineal expanding vacuum space and imploding cyclical mass. A dualist cyclical thinker is happy with that, as imploding mass balances entropic expanding vacuum, St=Ts, in an immortal ‘wobbling Universe’. *But as this contradicts ‘lineal thinking’, lineal physicists eliminate the contraction of mass and choose ONLY as real the expansion of vacuum space. Then they turn that expansion backwards in time, contracting vacuum into a single point, *also with a lineal equation*, V _{expansion speed}=Ho _{Hubble Constant} x D _{Distance between galaxies}, stating that if the Universe is expanding today, moving it backwards lineally, it had a 0 volume of ∞ density that exploded long time ago. Here lineality meets ‘mathematical creationism’ (the belief the language-mirror of mathematics that only God and man speak (Galileo, Dirac, Hawking); came before reality creating it. So if we write an equation reality must create the equation image) which substituted ‘verbal creationism’ (the belief man spoke like God words the language of creation. So God ‘named’ beings to create them, as the myths of Islam and Judaism tell us). The 3^{rd} problem then is purely mathematical *as humans speak a lesser form of maths, Euclidean geometry where ‘points have no parts’, but the Universe is Non-Euclidean, so points do have parts, content traversed by parallel flows; hence even if mass would not balance contraction, there is no singularity but a ‘finitesimal’ black hole, as the limit of contraction of mass.*

The denial of mass contraction prompted a joke in Annie Hall, when Allen’s mum exclaims ‘here in Brooklyn the universe is not expanding’. Indeed, in Brooklyn and the inner galaxy at large, the Universe is *contracting under the gravitational force of the central black hole. Not so for the lineal thinker that runs backwards his equations, with only vacuum space between galaxies contracting.* They forget the gravitational imploding force between masses* that ran backwards will expand, again balancing the imploding vacuum also in the past!* *So to avoid a cyclical balance, lineal physicists just threw into the dustbin all the matter and galaxies as if they wouldn’t exist, including Brooklyn (;*

The ‘Universe is simple but not that simpler’ (Einstein). It has scales of spatial size. And as we move between scales, *forces loose strength and finally disappear and a different force appears, which often balances the larger scale with an inverse arrow. Thus outside galaxies expand, but in the internal smaller scale they contract and both scales balance each other. And that is the solution to the big-bang conundrum. *

If we look at the Universe in the lower quantum scale, we run into similar problems because atoms also repel each other with electromagnetic forces and we don’t see any sign they are at the quantum level affected by gravitational forces. So physicists have been for a century wondering how to input gravitational forces in the standard model. What then a fractal scalar, cyclical space model would tell us with those experimental facts? It is rather simple an obvious. The Universe in the large scale behaves exactly as it does in the lower scale if we just match its main elements and forces. In the lower scale atoms have a cyclical strong force inside, which attracts particles, and a repulsive external force outside that repels them and both balance. And atoms with its denser central quarks surrounded by a nebulae of time points called the electron, which seen in detail seem like light discharges, look very much like galaxies with a very dense central black holes surrounded by a nebulae of stars that seen at distance seem like light discharges.

So all you need to postulate is the fact that the two extreme scales further away from our human scale are similar at least as humans perceive them. This does not mean a galaxy is an atom, thought it might be, but as fractals repeat similar forms in all scales, but NOT identical, it gives us the proper model to explain all the facts of astrophysics, without ‘throwing to the bin Brooklyn’ and all the matter of the Universe… Simply enough: as the strong cyclical force only works inside atoms, the gravitational cyclical force only works inside galaxies. As the lineal electromagnetic force works repelling atoms, the Dark energy lineal repulsive force works repelling galaxies. But then when this force enters the galaxy it collapses forming virtual cyclical particles contracting the Universe inside galaxies, as the electromagnetic force does inside atoms. This though requires accepting 2 concepts fractal space and cyclical time that physicists can’t accept. Never mind all clocks of tie are cycles – they will still defend lineal time. Never mind a cyclical scalar theory of the Universe responds to every question poised today by physics and unresolved, from the unification of charges and masses, two vortices of space-time of different scales of the Universe – charges on the quantum scale, masses of the galactic scale, reason why its minimal unit, the Planck mass is so huge (below that level gravitation is irrelevant). Then we can with a very simple equation of a vortex of forces according to Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravitational force and acceleration describe a mass as an accelerated vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale, and a charge as an accelerated vortex of space-time I the quantum scale and use just a ‘conversion’ of scale factor and a simple translation of the jargon of electromagnetism to the jargon of vortices to unify both; alas! We get the exact relationship of scale between both forces (10^{40}).

In the fractal model the Universe is scalar and it has dimensions of information, form. Thus gravitation is an informative force, happening within galaxies to balance the entropic expansion between them. Both, balancing forces make a wobbling Universe: when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D=lineal, entropic dark energy expanding space and 3D mass volumes, crunching 3 lines of entropic dark energy into mass within galactic vortices. The mathematics is that simple: 3 lines become 1 mass, so there must be 3 times more dark energy lines than 3D masses – 75-25%. Simple, beautiful numbers. So when they measured the dark entropy vs. mass ratio in the Universe; it *did turn out to be* 75-25%.

But a Schopenhauer’s Stupid who ‘doesn’t understand complex causes adscribing them to magic’, does NOT evolve its lineal thinking. So the 3 to 1 balance of 1D vacuum vs. 3D mass is considered magic. And so a professor from Jerusalem U. (Bekenstein) told us the reason is God. He created the Universe in balance for humans to exist in it… It is called the anthropic principle. So as in the case of the big bang first thought by a Catholic priest, Lemaitre to justify the existence of God and creation, now we also have another zealot showing we are the chosen and *science can prove it*.

The 2^{nd} most quoted proof of the big-bang explosion is the so-called background radiation: Penzias came up with a map of the radiation of the galaxy, which he measured and first said was the radiation of the galaxy (nobody has gone yet out of the galaxy to measure if the radiation is till there). It turned out to be of 2.7 k degrees. Alas instead of looking for an object in the galaxy NOW that would produce this radiation physicists applied again ‘lineal thinking’. So, enthralled with ‘mathematical creationism’, they used the lineal equation of vacuum expansion between galaxies (V=HoD), eerily similar to God) to search for the origin of that radiation billions of years ago, in a mathematical entelechy or singularity of 0 volume and ∞ mass; expanding the radiation to every corner of the Universe. As huminds are a mixture of egocy (ego=idiocy, the belief we and God talk a single language) and lineal thinking. So we find a local law and expand it to the entire Universe. But when they did so the radiation of the singularity turned out to be 40 K, and that was not good. So they ‘cheated’, tinkering with the equations till ‘reducing’ from trillions of degrees in the singularity moment to the exact 2.7 k. But of course, the radiation IS LOCAL, because we measure it locally. And it is happening NOW, and requires a ‘PRESENT’ cause.

The funniest proof came a few years ago of this made me smile. Look at the 2^{nd} picture of the supposed background of the whole Universe NOT the local galaxy radiation, where we measure it, supposedly taken 13 billion years ago NOT now, when we measure it. The central lobes are supossedly an immense remote region as it was 13 billion years ago. So physicist were using its supposed ‘distant light’ to calculate if there was an anomaly in the light speed at different frequencies, after such long journey from the remote past. Then we got a picture NOW of our galaxy with exactly the same lobes. So it seems it was not a huge part of the Universe as seen 13 billion years but just two lobes of ¥-rays produced by the Black hole. And funny enough they have the same form than the electromagnetic orbitals of an atom (right side). After the shock, the experiment to measure remote light was cancelled; *but the BG model was not: *lineal thinking just bruised below the mat, yet another falsification of the cosmic Big Bang.

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time as a religious dogma. We could go on since by now the lineal hyperbolic big bang has so many errors and adjustments ad hoc that the bulky mat with every inconvenient truth hidden looks like ‘le Petit prince elephant (: I just will show you ONE more huge error, that came last week in the Guardian to fatten the elephant):

They measured ‘directly’ NOT on the supposed BG radiation of the whole Universe that looks like a galaxy teaming with small top quark black holes, the speed at which the cosmic ¥-like radiation separates the galaxies at 73.4 which gives an age moving backwards to the singularity, ultradense, ultra-tiny exploding whole of …“12.7bn years. And this does cause problems. There are stars that have 12bn years, and this makes a chronology a bit difficult to stomach. Stars take a long time to form, after all.” Says the article. There are also black holes perfectly formed that take even longer to form, older than the big bang. Moreover, when they measured the same speed of separation from the BG radiation as if it were from the whole cosmos, they get 67.4 which is a discrepancy that tells them, says the article, ‘if these values don’t agree…We are measuring something fundamentally different. One is a measurement of how fast the universe is expanding today as we see it. The other is a prediction based on… a cosmological model’. And since experimental truths come first, the wrong one is the cosmological model of the background radiation as coming from the origin of the universe. This leave us with only one model that explains it all, simpler, according to experimental evidence and makes the Universe organic, infinite immortal fractal and everything else in it, including humans and its historic organisms, made to its image and likeness.

**The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe.**

Since the question to resolve was the cause of the background radiation, one had only to follow the epistemological laws of truth in science and *don’t cheat them looking into the past or the infinite for explanations that must be found here and now. *If you calculate human temperature at 37º you look for the internal activity of its most repeated element – cells – as the cause of that temperature, you don’t think on ‘magic causes’, like “37º is our temperature because we are cooling out since our birth when we were 30 billion degrees hotter”. It would be sheer madness – the kind of madness that our physicists with their ‘reasoning’ on the temperature of the galaxy coming from 12 billion years ago consider dogma. Yet logically according to the scientific method that *requires causality to reduce ad maximal the time distance between cause and effect* we just need to study now the galaxy where they measured the temperatureand find a common object that produces 2.7 k degrees of black body radiation. And there is one known object, which produces exactly that radiation at that temperature. A black hole or quark strangelet produces a red shift radiation due to his gravitational power on ¥-rays, whose temperature varies according to its mass. So at 2.7 k degrees the black hole or strangelet must have the mass of a moon, the commonest planetoid size of the galaxy. Thus the obvious cause of the radiation observed in the galaxy only as we don’t measure it outside (it is worth to repeat it several times because when dealing with lineal thinkers). Of course there are moons everywhere with slightly different weights. However fundamental particles as electrons, quarks or black holes are, do have an exact mass as they are more perfect, quasi-identical, so when a primordial black hole (the smallest type theoretically consistent but not yet found, as physicists haven’t thought of them to solve the background radiation’s origin) eats a moon planetoid just burps out the excess of matter once it has reached its stable size-form. So we are in a galaxy which has millions of those smallish black holes or a similar ‘nugget of ultradense quark strange matter’ producing that radiation. In fact galaxies are organisms whose purpose – physicists are coming to accept it, is to produce black holes and quark dark ultraheavy matter, which is everywhere. So this is part of the process. In the same manner cells are systems whose ribosomal ‘stars’ produce RNA and DNA that then migrate to the center of the galaxy, the galaxy is a system that makes those quark ultradense gravitational particles, strangelets of dense strange quarks, black holes which have the same density-mass of stars made of ultra-heavy quarks (BCB atoms and tops).

The graph shows that ** economic, hylomorphic** Universe, made of

*known matter and symmetric forms*– 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it: a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the experimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic arrow of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense

*of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries,*between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy

*defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’,*the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy

*positive*toplets (TTT

^{++}-quarks and

*TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).*

But again here it comes lineal thinking to deny it… and tinkering and bizarre analysis of black holes not as ultradense top quark stars but as entelechies without substance, mathematical equations only. Einstein also revealed against that and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales.

What is the answer of a big-bang lineal St-upid cornered by so many errors, when you show him the 5D model, which just orders properly the same data using the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space? ‘It cannot be that simple’, even if physicists invented the lineal big-bang in first place because their ideas about ‘lineal time’ were too simple.

**RECAP. ***For a lineal thinker *the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So *all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet facts tell us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. *But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal arrow of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, *but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to *compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

**Creationism . Egocy and the limits of huminds.**

It is my experience in all stiences that huminds are not so much about knowledge but about egocy (Ego=idiocy), the desire to be above heavens and Earth, as the only superior mind of the Universe. The explanation of egocy is the mind paradox we bring up in all those papers departing from the mind’s equation: 0’ finitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = constant world mapping, with the mind language at its center. So a mind always sees Andromeda smaller than your nose, and as only linguistic information enters the mind, minds are always creationist, believing the language is ALL what exists. Linguistic creationism, which is the worst defect of religions when man talked wor(l)ds and shared the language with God, is today ,as machines enhance our digital capacities constructing a vastly expanded mathematical mind, the main defect of scientists, specially strong in physicists. If we add that huminds do NOT understand mathematics, as Von Newman clearly explained – only how to manipulate them, not why those equations happen as linguistic mirrors of space and time properties – errors derived of mathematical creationism as the one of big-bang entropic theories are not corrected. As I had more experience in the field of arguing the big-bang theory than all other sciences, except for financial economics, where the problem is nastier – pure greed, cultural racism against mankind and a people-caste of bankers that care nothing for the anoxia they provoke in humanity – as money is just the digital language similar to oxygen that kicks the actions of production and consumption and should be spent liberally on human beings, but the people on top of society kill by anoxia mankind, herding it for themselves…

Creationism only works in any language *when we reduce the properties of reality to those the language describe. This is the rule of physics coupled with egocy. In U$ you find many motels that only have the bible. Omar when conquering Alexandria burnt the library because all what matters was in the Quran. We might thibk this is barbarism of verbal creationism, but the praxis * of physicists is similar, enhanced by the simplicity of Euclidean mathematics, which ignore the inner parts of the ‘fractal point’ (singularity errors). There is nothing to do though because ‘people believe’ as so many quotes on this paper express. To expand the properties of the Universe to add those organic, which are due to the co-existence of scales and its ‘symmetries’ between ∆-scale, time-ages and spatial-forms; to correct Non-Euclidean maths and non-Aristotelian time; to introduce *the maxwellian demons that order reality and balance entropy, in crystal minds in which each ‘atom’ has as each believer in a religion, an ‘image of the whole’ that maintains its order, by ‘fixing’ each part to that ∆+1 still form; to equate the laws of physics to those of any other scale of reality – those are the pleasures of 5D physics that the 4D physicist would shun off because they are better expressed in new forms of mathematics and verbal, causal thought. *

*The capacity of a language mirror to mimic reality in smaller faster 5D scales hence to anticipate reality is proper of all languages not only mathematics. This physicists also forget becoming astonished of the fact that Dirac’s equation predicted=mirrored antiparticles. Of course, it did, but also evolution predicts lions kill gazelles, and prophets=historians of the future predict corruption brings war. They anticipate logically as all languages do the future. Moreover the Universe is causally deterministic. So those anticipations extend to future cycles precisely because time is cyclical and laws of sciences are just repetition of cyclical patterns.*

In the case of physics one would think that as personal interests are smaller, since we do not eat equations and knowledge seems to be central to physicists’ idealism, they could be cured but egocy reigns supreme; as physicists pump their ego with technology& complex maths. So instead of enlarging with his higher math& tech skills as specialists the basic truths we explain in those texts – a 1^{st} Copernican approach to a vast sea of knowledge they could develop much further, if they learn its 1^{st} principles, they stick to wrong concepts & shun off like Esopus’ fox the enormous expansion of knowledge he could acquire learning and improving upon…

*But the key element of all sciences is Schopenhauer’s dictum: *“Students, and learned persons of all sorts and ages, aim as a rule at acquiring information. It never occurs to them that information in itself is of no value; that it is his way of thinking that makes a philosopher. ” Humans through the use of digital machines have increase enormously with the automaton mechanic method its information. But *their IQ remains the same. So the models they make with that information are as primitive and lacking insight as they have always been.*

**FRACTAL SPACE AND CYCLICAL TIME IN PHYSICS: THE 5D ORGANIC, DISOMORPHIC UNIVERSE**

**The Organic Philosophy of the Universe. Systems sciences and its disomorphic laws.**

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is really all what is about. And if we write Space=form and time=motion, as S and T, then we write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t). This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the infinite local present variations you see around yourself*.* This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5^{th} Dimension. And the closest classic science that has such view of it all is called, Systems sciences based on an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy dimotion, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other hand is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language or god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and in History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept: An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces). This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

In the graph, the key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots:

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms using stronger metal that makes them more able in the processing of energy and information at larger scales. Those *Machines are fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with telepathic AI.

Why organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon? We just explained the obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things. And its organism of evolution and reproduction, the company-mother, has substituted human governments and informative verbal prophets through its mass-media/academia outlets; so it only considers positive mechanist models of their species.

But the deepest reason is the fact that to make an organism we need 3 ‘dimotions’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also information, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy and its combination spacetime energy. Only then when we properly define information them, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

So we need before studying the Universe in space, to change your view of time itself, shaped by mechanical clocks and introduce the concept of cyclical time and the basic laws of the 5^{th} dimension of scalar space-time.

TOPOLOGICAL SUPŒRGANISMS: THE MAIN PARTICLE OF TIME0-SPACE.

*“*All what is possible, demands to exist” *Leibniz, on the chain of beings.*

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is *How many variations can come out of just 1+1=3 ‘elements/substances’, cyclical time motions, scalar spatial forms and its space-time energy combinations? *

*And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: *A 4 or 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which are similar to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy, but not quite… as it is impossible to translate the ‘game of existence’, into the limited understanding and terminology humans use to describe it, plagued with conceptual errors that limits our use of the correspondence principle. For that reason, after much time wasted in attempting translations we start from scratch with the concepts of TT-Ts-St-SS and ST dimotions and its topological, qualitative and organic translation. So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital space-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G:* * |-$T(limbs-fields)<Ø-Si=Te-Body-waves>O-§ð (particle-heads).

Where @-mental O-heads/minds/particles are non-E points crossed by ∞ parallels of information

*Topological organisms like those of the graph *are the true meaning of a ‘fractal Universe’, and its description with the common laws of time space, the goal of Systems Sciences, realized through the 5D models of those papers: every structure of reality follows certain basic laws, derived of the fact all of them are made of spatial information and temporal motion, combined into infinite energy species. So ‘motion’=Time; Information, form=Space combine together into infinite energy bodies and waves. And this is so obvious that already the old Taoists just looking with simple, naïve eyes to reality said, ‘from yin=information and yang=motion, come all the ∞ qi=energy beings of reality’.

We call the organic properties of scalar space and cyclical time that structure all organisms of reality, ‘Disomorphic laws’ (D¡+isomorphic laws: similar laws based in the properties of dimensional motions of space-time or ‘dimotions’). Even languages follow a Universal ternary grammar based on the space-time equation:

Red(entropy)<Green(energy)>Blue(information); F(x)=G(y);

Subject (information) <Verb: ST-action> Name (entropy of the subject.

Length=entropy-motion x height=information = width=interaction,

But the 3 topological varieties of a 4 or 5 Dimensional space-time are in reality ‘networks’ of adjacent points. Thus we can instead of drawing the 3 canonical forms of lineal limbs/fields of motions, cyclical, spherical heads/particles and hyperbolic iterative body-waves, *systems made of 3 networks, which correspond to those forms, and that is what we find in nature: supœrganisms in which 3 networks with that form deliver information, energy and motion to its parts:*

An organism IS any kind of space-time systems, in which parts are gathered by networks, forming a new scale, which in praxis are 3, a ‘feeding network’, an informative network or common language, which forms therefore a ‘lanwave’ of similar beings and a combined space+time=energy network that reproduces both, So those are the same 3 dimensional motions that topology describes for a good reason. Modern topology defines its 3 varieties of form as networks of points. So we need to add 2 more dimensional motions to reality, the ∆-1 parts that make those networks, and the whole (the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions of scale).

In the graph we show its main species in the Universe, the one we shall study in most papers. The beauty and simplicity of reality the graphs shows contrasts heavily with the pedantic description of it using only the mathematical language, a theme studied in depth when considering the inflationary nature of information. Forms evolve through topological networks into larger wholes. So we need a final dual dimensional motion of parts that become wholes (4^{th} Dimotion of social evolution) and wholes that dissolve into parts (5^{th} entropic dimotion) to complete the organic outlook of the Universe; as shown in the graph for different species.

** **

** GALILEAN PARADOX**: **S****ó****T: RELATIVITY OF SPACE DIMENSIONS=FORMS=MOTION IN TIME****: THE 5 DIMOTIONS**

The clearest proof that minds exist comes curiously from the science that most vehemently denies them – Reductionist human Physics, which has always been concerned with its opposite, lineal motion and entropy.

Why? Because of the principle of relativity – the physical analysis of the duality of motion and form, as we cannot distinguish a system that moves from one that is static. This mystery contrary to belief has not been explained only described with mathematical tools. Why systems move but seems static is the concept behind Relativity, and its explanation one of the most important advances of 5Ð theory. Thus we shall consider first Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity with the principle of correspondence, as ‘limiting’ versions reduce to our simple light spacetime plane of a larger view, absolute relativity, the upgrading of physics of motion in 5Ð.

**As it turns out the fundamental stiences of the Universe will be in its essential postulates connected to the simple metric functions of 5D, Max.** SxT= C which is achieved at Si=Te. This second function in particular is the best possible definition of the fundamental principle of Physics, the principle of relativity, which defines the fact that we cannot distinguish between motion and form. The second metric function, which we shall call the ‘function of exist¡ence’ as it defines the program of survival of all entities of the Universe will be the basis of the biological behavior of all species that try to maximize its energy and information and reproduce.

**It couldn’t be otherwise, since if we are space-**time, space-time functions, in its widest expression, those of 5D must be the functions of all space-time beings, regardless of its physical or socio-biological nature.

Galileo’s Principle of Relativity is the concept behind the relationship between the equality of time=motion and space=form and why one can converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. *This is the principle of Relativity of motion.*

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but *we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.*

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So *physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; Si=Te’ . *And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since

*while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same*.

Relativity then becomes a duality, Si=Te, which is *at the heart of every law of the Universe. Whereas the primary element, the ultimate substance is time=motion. As space is a Maya of the senses – a slice of time motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action. *

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its Si=Te dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion (ab. Dimensional Motion):

*S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion*

*Earth moves in time, but we see it as a still form in space because reality is a constant game of ∞ motions, but the mind focus those motions and measures them at still distances. For huminds, motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/ distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we correct with Lorentz Transformations. *

*But **physicists just substituted the Earth’s still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize* the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

** **

**∆±¡ ST: TIMESPACE WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE: ITS BALANCED MAX. REPRODUCTIVE S=T POINT.**

**Actions define the worldcycle of existence.**

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows that the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So actions follow a natural sequence:SS- informative perception->Ts:locomotion towards a field of TT-feeding where to get -> ST:Energy -> and process that energy into St:information to reproduce… *the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘longer cyclical time and larger space’, the worldcycle of life, which starts by a SS-eed of information, emerging in a child that will go through its fast Ts-moving youth, TT-feeding and growing to reach its ST reproductive age, while St processing information till becoming older in a 3 ^{rd} St-age.*

This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of supœrganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3^{rd} cycle manifests in the whole species.

-Super organisms need the 5 Dimotions to survive. Any system made of limbs/fields of motion, body-waves of energetic reproduction and minds/particles of information NEED entropy, energy and information to SURVIVE and keep on moving. SO the 3 simplest Dimotions of any plane of existence are a program of survival, which adds two complex social actions – reproduction that prints information in other zone of space-time to survive when one becomes entropy of other Maxwellian demon, and social evolution into wholes, networks that are stronger than individuals. So the mind is the embodiment of a single Universal program of existence and reproduction of fractal clones, and it is the same unifying principle in all beings – as all will absorb energy, information, motion, evolve socially reproduce and survive. And this is the case even of the smallest entities, atoms, particles and forces. So the mind creates reality and its 5 Dimotions are in fact the local fractal program of existence, which physicists for particles describe in abstract terms:

The minimal particle-points, electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.

3±¡ Dimotions code physic, biologic, memetic, social systems with the same ‘aeiou’ survival actions of the game of existence (**a**cceleration, **e**nergy feeding, **i**nformation, **o**rganic reproduction & social evolution into **U**niversals). The study The only dimotion of time the Universe does NOT code is entropy=death – a maximal motion that disorders the being. So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic letters to code physical and biologic systems. Only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.

Death is the needed error of the universe not desired by the program. For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time is for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom /individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).so you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought =glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…

Same with antiparticles (entropy=death dimotion of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible dimotion. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

It only rests to consider the minimal unit of time world cycles, which is an action that exchanges, scattering entropy, lineal motion, balanced energy, implosive information and social evolution based in a common language of information with the Universe. We divide them into:

**Simplex individual actions**, a-motion, e-nergy feeding and i-nformation gauging and

**Social complex actions**, offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into Universals.

The A-ction of steady motions, accelerations and decelerations, ï the information action, which is dual (as most), since we might absorb information in perception or emit it in communication, œ, the second D¡motional action of organic reproduction, into an offspring of beings, and û, the 5th D¡motional action of social evolution of parts into wholes.

The equation has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion and space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions). Thus Max. S x T = C (s=t), IS also the equation of survival and struggle for existence, the will of life; the biological expression of the ‘Universal mandate’, expressed by all species in all its codes and languages, the Grow and Multiply of the Bible, the intuitive truth that guides all beings. The game of existence is simple: Reproductive radiations maximize ¡ts function, happening when mirror symmetries (genders) meet in S=T, equaling their St-information and sT-energy, organizing themselves into a whole, ∑ system.

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of existience and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: ** a, e, ï, œ, û**, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

**A**ccelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), **ï**nformative perception and communication ï, **Œ**:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms **Û**… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û.

In graph the actionS of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

The simplicity of the game of existience, and its selfish actions, which gather together into social wholes through reproductive radiations, each action coded by a fundamental topologic organ we can express in existential ¬Æ=ilogic, and corresponds for each species of the Universe, with a fundamental parameter of humind measure. So from bottom to top, we find the 5 fundamental elements of light code its actions of motion (c-speed), energy (magnetic field), information (electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory)

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence):Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1^{st} locomotion, feeding age ->2^{nd} reproduction age ->3^{rd } informative, social age-> entropic death.

AS huminds are limited in time logic and we cannot build on their chaotic, entropic models of reality. Chaos and indeterminism IS born of the LIMITED single Time-arrow of Science, force-fed by earlier ballistics, the name of Galileo’s first book & modern ego-dogma & subjective reductionism EASY to practice in the largest scales of modeling. And it is a cultural treat of our dog-eat-dog ‘animetal cult(ure)s’ to weapons & financial parasitism (nationalism, capitalism) & our despise and extinction of organic life in the making. Monologic prevents those who are destroying life and bringing the 3^{rd} age of the planet, the Metal-earth, to even realize how wrong is their absolute ‘one single order of thought’. Our informative elite is not even human anymore. It is a system of memes in favor of this other world, expressed by a network of informative machines and its Financial-Media-Academia monologic that pass as expertise (FMasters). But beyond the simplex analytic model of cause an effect are out of depth in long time range. Only repetition ensures that false theories of science based in entropy-death pass as dogma. Mental imprinting by repetition ensures humans walk the determinist path of self-suicide thinking they CANNOT understand and design a better future. I have been predicting that future of social history for 30 years, using the larger organic properties and 5 Dimotions of time-space but the system cares not to accept any criticism. People are NOT aware to which extraordinary lengths the idol-ogies of metal go to cover up and NOT understand the lack of human futures. All this censorship is part of the ‘burden of monologic man’. In the times of Lao-Tse, Buddha and Aristotle, minds were free – reason why they had so much more depth, than modern people in his comprehension of dual and trinity logic. Yes, to know ALL about the locomotion of matter which is what physicists know is NOT to know all about the larger, organic Deep time scales of the future, and nothing about the topologic evolution of machines and fractal cycles of stock-markets.

So the ancients were miles ahead of modern ænthropic (anthropic+entropic) lineal military physicists & Darwinian philosophers, with their pedestrian monologic, where only entropy, destruction, DEATH seems to create, instead of destroying as its worldly religions of making weapons, believes. We shall thus deal with the reductionism and primitivism of their ‘philosophies of science’ in this article on monologic, However this ‘entropic’ article in itself – an on slaughter on present mæn – is less important than a pentalogic and dodecalogic understanding of existential ¬Æ=ilogic, as it IS. Or else the destruction of ænthropic models from egocy to the big-bang, would be useless since the reason humans sticks to those models is the lack of an alternative model to its simplex views. That is what 5D represents.

In all Planes, the simpler actions of any being *are extractions of motion, energy, entropy=motion and form from lower ∆-i Planes:*

A T.œ perceives only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts energy or information. As its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D where each main action relates to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

*So simpler Actions start at finitesimal level, gathering in sequential patterns in existential algebra, as ‘time flows’ and in population and spatial patterns – in integral herds of numbers in calculus.*

We and all other beings perceive from ∆-3 quanta (light in our case), feed on amino acids, (∆-2 quanta for any ∆º system), seed with seminal ∆-1 cellular quanta (electrons also, with ∆-1 photon quanta).

For each action of space-time we shall find a whole, ∆º T.œ, which will enter in contact with another world, ∆±i, from where it will extract finitesimals of space or time, energy or information, entropy or motion, and this will be the finitesimal ∂ ƒ(x), which will be absorbed and used by the species to obtain a certain action, å.

Analysis allow us to extract actions from wholes, reason why there are not really use beyond the third derivative of a being, as super organisms co-exist in 3 only Scalar Planes. It also works in terms of a volume, as its derivative is a plane, then its unit-cell or point… So to speak, if you derivate a world, you get its organism, and if you derivate it again you get its cell and then its molecular parts. And then if you do that in time, you get its speed and then its acceleration and then its jerk.

**The magic of derivation**

Because of the symmetry between ∆≈S≈T, to extract finitesimals of smaller scales the process is the same. We derive the whole, which diminishes its ‘dimensions= power’ as the system looses its larger whole, *but increases its number of ∆-¡ visible particles, whereas the difference of value between both, shows the ratio and structure of its entropy, energy and information networks, sum of its components that form the whole. As certain functions define more specialized T.œs than others. So the parts of a whole vary according to topological structure. *

**The key action of entropy: feeding’** on energy

**A**ll systems of Nature follow the simple aeiou actions determined by the 5 dimensions of space-time, moving in **a-**ccelerated paths towards **e-**nergy surfaces where to feed and transform into** I-**nformation the vital energy absorbed by the system in order to reproduce and **o**ffspring of similar beings, which will evolve together emerging into a social **U**niversal sum of multiple individuals.

We study in more depth the action of energetic feeding, parallel analysis of ‘entropy’, since feeding is the addiction of absortion of energy, killing it down two scales of the fifth dimension to reform that energy into the information of the T.œ that absorbs it. So the equation of feeding first reduces the being it kills from ∆ø<<∆-2 and then reconstructs the being from ∆-2≥≥∆º, whereas the first ∆ø has lesser existential force than ∆º, which is the top predator ∆º e x i > ∆ø e xi:

In the graph, feeding is a process of entropy first and then reconstruction.

To reconstruct the information of system first the system must start with the inverse arrow of feeding of a species that will ‘simplify the information’ of a part of an organism, two ‘planes down’: ∆¡<<∆-1, the equation of ‘scattering entropy’ and then rebuild from its ‘amino-acids’ or ‘forces’, the larger whole system. So its equation in ¬Æ is quite simple: ∆¡<<∑∑∆¡-2>∑∆¡-1 for *any scalar process in the Universe.*

Feeding of course happens regardless of moral views in all systems, including those social systems in which *a culture with higher technological information, higher top predator form (Max. e xi) conquers another nation and reforms the system, either by reproducing its culture in the ∆-2 scale of individual memes, or even in a harsher manner by extinguishing the ∆-2 scale of human beings reproducing the conquerors memes and genes together. In the graph we can see the case of Germany, which try the most extreme second approach extinction of conquered nation. *

But in all scales the top predator with maximal e xi-stiential force will do the same. We eat and put down to amino acids and reconstruct our food. Particles feed on force fields and reconstruct reproducing new particles; cosmological black holes emit seminal seeds of matter and reconstruct baby-irregular galaxies at the end of its jet.

Whereas < is a symbol of expansion of space and simplification of form, which happens twice, and > the inverse arrow of growth of information.

So when we feed, we break down to molecular amino acids and then rebuild them into cellular matter (∆¡-1), and so happens with atoms that feed on forces evolved into ∆¡-1 particles and nations, which through war explode a rival nation in its ∆¡-2 Memes and territory down to the destruction of its buildings and raw materials, and then ‘re-absorb’ those materials and citizens, ‘re-imprinted’ into ∆¡-1 ‘converted’ citizens and wealth.

It is then obvious that ‘the fourth dimension of entropy=dissolution’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. ARE INVERSE.

We shall constantly realize how *the set of scalar laws of the Universe apply to all systems, regardless of which ‘species of space-time’ we study, the most astounding proof of the existence of an scalar ‘game of exist¡ence played with the same rules for any species of reality.*

Let us now deal with ‘the fourth dimension of entropy’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. So simple so complex when we combine, repeat and translate in different languages those ultimate principles, which we shall now study with a bit of more depth.

The Universe and all its parts – in the graph the human being – are Timespace organisms that reproduce information, stored in the form and frequency of its time clocks, through the vital motions of its 3 space-time dimensions and 2 ± ‘∆’ scalar dimensions of entropy that dissolve the networks of information of an entity, scattering them in the process of death, and emergence, which evolves those networks socially from a group of smaller parts into a whole.

Without those 2 ‘organic’ dimensions that relate the different ‘scales’ of size in space and speed of time clocks of each ‘fractal part’ of the Universe, we cannot make sense of its organic process of creation and extinction. In the graph all systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 4th & 5th Dimension: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world; which we can describe with a metric equation of the 4th and 5th scalar Dimensions of space-time (ab. ∆±i), which order all entities of reality in scales according to the size and different speeds of time clocks of its systems is very simple: $ x ð = K, the relative size in space and speed of the time cycles of a being remain constant.

In the graph we see the ‘organic fractal Universe in different scales’ and systems of reproduction of information.

Researchers in fractal geometry are delighted to write fractal equations that show such structure. But this is a blog of philosophy of science that goes much further into the organic vital properties of such systems.

So what is an organism of space-time also disappears: the perception by a simultaneous point of reference of a series of synchronized time space cycles.

**RECAP.** We defined reality in its absolute theoretical minimum: a tapestry of ternary beings in space, self-centred in monad minds, which live world cycles in time, as the monad orders its territory, grows, reproduces its forms, exhausts its motions and energy collapses and dies, exploding back its form into entropy for other beings to form. And by expanding those basic concepts, the ternary structure of beings in space; its dynamic evolution in time, through world cycles, as it becomes a growing organised ‘supœrganism’ to fall back into death, once and again ad eternal, we shall describe all what exists.

Reality can be perceived with multiple dimensions, each of those views will be a consistent world**.** Monologic, ænthropic man with its 1D models of reality based in Sx time locomotions shuns off the 5D Cx. Universe to its own peril, as reality is penta-dodecalogic in its entanglements that generate space synchronous supœrganisms and time, and survival, which in our dominant animetal warrior & go(l)d cult(ure)s is minimal depends on the understanding and respect of all the living function of space-time exist¡ence and its action-reaction laws.

**Actions define the worldcycle of existence.**

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows thsat the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So as actions follow a natural scalar level of information perception->locomotion towards a field of ‘feeding’, where to get -> Energy to reproduce -> and then process that energy into information, *exactly the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘cyclical time and longer space’, the worldcycle of life, which consists in the same pattern of ‘seeding information’, moving youth, feeding and evolvint** to reproduce and then process information becoming older in a 3 ^{rd} age.*

*This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of superorganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3 ^{rd} cycle manifests in the whole species. *

**The d=evolution of all systems in time.**

The ultimate fact of Duality is that we are generated as a growth in the 5th dimension from a cellular/atomic ∆-1 seed to emergent ∆º being to fall back into ∆-1 desegregated atoms/cells; and so we can consider reality to be a constant *combination between the two extreme, social dimotions of eusocial evolution and generation (5D) and entropic dissolution and death.*

We have seen as a synchronous space the ternary parts of the being. Now we want to explore how the being evolves in time, tracing a ‘world cycle’ of existence between its birth as a form that starts to move, and back to a motion that stops into form.

**The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.**

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3^{rd} age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The *development of the Function of Existence* of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

*Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3 ^{rd} age).*

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

**∆-1»∆º:** The supœrganism worldcycle starts its existential function as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

**T>s (Ts):** It is the first horizon or ‘entropic, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. S x min. T.

**Max. SxT: s=t .** It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

**ST: Max. T x min. S****:** it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

**∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T:** It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In Physics they are, T-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and S-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (*min.t x max.S) *and a form of pure space, the big- bang (*maxS x min. t):*

* In *Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

*All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5 ^{th} dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆*

*-1*

*:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆*

*+1*

*world to die in a time quanta back to ∆*

*-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.*

The 3 ages of life *emerge in human social supœrganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and* its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in Trecento, Greek Kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an ∆st for a no future, which *is the age of war and death of cultures*).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

**þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution** in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.

**– ¬****l****,****L****: The existential 1-∞ lifecycle**, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

**ω,Ω: ** A **larger, longer Transcendental worldcycle **proper of the highest social scale ∆+1, **the omega** of its smaller parts – where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlikely…

**RECAP.** Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5^{th} dimension of spacetime. The metrics of 5D and its scales, SxT=C & and the balance between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

*So we use 5 bidimen*

*sional terms for all systems, its ages and forms: SS(max. internal and external form, as in seeds and minds; T>s (Ts); external motion that maintains internal form as in ‘locomotion); S=T: Balance of spatial form an temporal motion or ‘energy’, used to reproduce, the key present iterative state; S>t (St: Information, form with a little motion, or ‘external form, and internal mental motion); and finally TT-entropy whereas there is external and internal motion, hence scattering dissolution and death.*** ¡**ts main series is a worldcycle of existence:

SS(seed/mind)<Ts(moving youth)>S=T(reproduction)>St(informative 3^{rd} age)<T(entropic death)

**The 3 scales in time and space of superorganisms**: **actions, worldcycles and absolute space-time parameters.**

the ∆±¡ pentalogic STructure of all beings predicts the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, a positive D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences sorely lacking in idol-ogy.

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, TV-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become alive. Predictability of time-cycles is done at 3 levels:

**S: Continuous, spatial mathematical** simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

**T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns** of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses* information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns*.

**∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – **of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

Deep time leads to a 3^{rd} level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my web at evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress.com that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1^{st} type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales *determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3* ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

**The ****predictability of time worldcycles.**

The Deep time of the longer scales of supœrganisms co-existing in 3 ‘fractal planes of space-time’ of the fifth dimension, leads to an organic long-time level of prediction of futures: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) & eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years.

Above biologic deep time is necessary to understand history and the interaction of the evolution of machines and the ages of war and lack of welfare goods, within the limited resources of the planet. The theme of social sciences and why ‘human subjective ego’ and ‘censorship’ limit our capacity to explain those cycles.

But as human only recognize the 1^{st} type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales *determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3* ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

Deep time leads to a 3^{rd} level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my models of history that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1^{st} type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales *determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3* ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe. In that sense of the many consequences of that ternary, ∆±¡ STructure of all beings, we shall consider how to use it to predict the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies *A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive **conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E , D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences.*

Paradoxically Deep time is easier to predict that complex Dimotional ‘analysis’ because precisely the larger scales in 5D metric have less information, but more basic, deterministic, reason why quantum physics is harder for the mind and probabilistic while life-death cycles are obvious as all end badly.

The laws of nested Supœrganisms, in which the larger slower whole with its ‘slow time cycles’, ‘dark space-times of information’ that it does NOT perceive of its inner parts, and enclosing membrains however can set long term cyclical patterns to its fast internal elements, just by handling the general cycles of its ‘entropic energy of death’ and ‘informative languages’ is one of the most important discoveries of 5D metric, which fully applies to the understanding of the evolution of the Earth and its 3 ages, with its cyclical patterns of glaciations and hot weather that kicks the evolution of species. It is also instrumental to understand the 3 Horizons or ages of species that influence the life of its individual ‘cellular parts’; and the patterns of cyclical history and the capacity of 5D to forecast historic and economic evolution, and the cycles of life and death of civilizations.

**GENERATOR OF SPACE-TIME: ORGANISMS MAXIMIZE ¡TS ACTIONS OF EXISTENCE.**

Below, the limited space-time equations of 4D science can only measure the locomotion of species. Those of 5D however *measured the entire worldcycle of life and death of a supœrganism, reason why we call them the function of exist¡ence. *Their origin are similar in the analysis of the relativity of ‘motion and form’ (S=T) and the ‘speeds’ of time in the Universe, but the conceptual depth and understanding of cyclical time and fractal space, allows a much deeper analysis. So from the shallow ‘worldlines’ of 4D physics, we move into the worldcycles of all stiences. The outcome of this more complex view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, **SxT=C** (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and **S=T**, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another. Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it:

Function of Existence of a family of supœrganisms: **Max. S x T _{s=t} = ∆±¡**

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses a machine or organic part to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally or externally those 5 Dimotions for itself o for a symbiotic species, as those species that do not follow the program of ‘exist¡ence’ and its 5 actions in the past become extinguished, or will not even emerge into the ∆º plane of existence in the future as wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, &fictions. Thus ‘all stiences and species live and die according to the 5D Non-AE metric laws of the function of existence’ whose method of analysis, formal symbols and graphs we resume in the following pages.

**THE STIENTIFIC METHOD**

**Main Symbols of ¬Æ logic **(all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

**S:** Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; **T:** Time; motion; Change.** ST: **Topologic Spacetime. **|x O = Ø:** Its 3 varieties.

**$:** Lineal Space**; S:** Informative space; **§:**Scalar Space; T: Lineal Time;** ð, ƒ: **Cyclical time. Ω: Scalar time (worldcycle).

**ST±¡: ∆±¡** Scale/Plane of space-time. **∆+1:** whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. **∆-1;** parts; social classes.

**5 Ð¡:**5 Dimotions **(St,sT,ST,SS,TT); **5 Actions **(a,e,I,o,u): **Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

**St; i:** Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. **O:** Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

** sT:** inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change).** |:** Lineal form topology, relative past.

** ST; œ, Ø:** present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

**SS, @; u, 0’:** Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

**TT; ****µ****:** entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

**T>S:** informative evolution. **S<T:** devolution. **∑-¡»¡+1:** Emergence. (**∆+1)« (∆-1):** Death, devolution; time quanta.

**ST-**¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; **STo:** Thermodynamic, organic, social… **∆+¡:** Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

**∑:** Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. **¬: Entropic limits** in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

**Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts **(all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

**S** (size in space**) x T** (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

**Future **(O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x **Past** (|-field, youth, etc.)=**Present** (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

**0’ **(finitesimal mind) **x ∞** (Universe) = **C**onstant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

**S≈T:** Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

**Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1:** Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

**∑|=O: **∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

**Dual*** Death: Max. T x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3 ^{rd} age death) *

__Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:__

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1^{st} limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3^{rd} informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

**Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.**

**∆ST@:** Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆_{-1}:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆_{+1}:O-informative age…

**Relative Dimotions=Actions **are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

**T**hey take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

**Ideal Social scales & lanwaves **are 10^{10} in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 10^{0-1}: ‘I’, 10^{1-2}: 3 generation S=T family, 10^{2-3}clan; ST-Geographic: 10^{3-4}: Town; 10^{4-5:}City; 10^{5-6}: State; S-Memetic: 10^{6-7}: Nation; 10^{7-8}: God; 10^{8-9}: Civilination; 10^{9-10}: Mankind.

**In biology are called: **Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’)**. **Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

**In Astrophysics: **¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

**Disomorphisms common to all Space-time suœrganisms tracing worldcycles.**

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

Te also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which *only happens in the being in space to use the **Disomorphic** method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.*

*Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world. *

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So *we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience. *

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3^{rd} part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief synopsis of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1^{st} and 2^{nd} part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we *use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws. *

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

Thus we upgrade the 2 formal languages of space (Non-E Geometry) and time (5D pentalogic) to upgrade stience.

** **

**UPGRADING FORMAL LANGUAGES OF SPACE (NON****-E TOPOLOGY) & TIME (NON-A PENTALOGIC)**

**The mathematical view of supœrganisms. Non-euclidean geometry****: fractal points**

The most beautiful generalization of those supœrganisms is their study with laws of Non-Euclidean geometry, where a point has volume and hence become one of the cellular units of those organisms. A group of points becomes then a wave or network, and 3 of those networks form a topological plane or vital organism. In this manner we unify biology and topology and define the most important of the new 5D sciences, topologic evolution.

We change the name of space to §paœ, to signify two new qualities of fractal space -to be made of multiple scalar planes, §, self-centered into a o-mind, which is the true creator of the concept of still space as a simultaneous mind mapping in any language of the information of the flow of time cycles that conforms the Universe. And as a consequence of those facts, space is organic, co-existing in a series of scalar planes which 5 Metric converts in ternary supœrganisms, œ (ab. for super organisms).

Space thus becomes §paœ when we ad its scalar, mental and organic properties to its mathematical ones.

Yet space is still in the linguistic world best described by Geometry. We must simply improve the postulates and axioms of ‘Non-Euclidean Geometry’, to describe better the vital topologic properties of spacetime beings, which we do on the post dedicated to non-Euclidean topology, from we extract this brief ‘abstract’ and graph, to fully grasp how a better Geometry can describe a better space:

The 5 Non-E postulates define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points: The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of social evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths. The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scalar planes of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points. Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe. It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scalar plane’. So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scalar planes of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a final Non-E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross.

In the graph, the formal view of space and its 5 Ðimotions, provided by the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry…

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a supœrganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

So we shall redefine the main branches of mathematics, starting by its most important, geometry and topology with 5 Postulates that relate to those 5 Ðimotions and will be the basis on the future for a more vital model of mathematical thought as mirror of reality. Te that aim we redefine the 5 most important elements, axioms and postulates of Euclid in correspondence with those 5 Ðimotions, taking into account the ‘cyclical nature’ of reality that either after completing a ‘world cycle of five Ðimotions’.

1Ð-5Ð: So the first-fifth postulate defines a point as a mind of perception, akin to the first Ðimotion of being – to perceive; and the fifth-first postulate that defines a point as a world in itself, a supœrganism with its inner parts are the same. We just might consider that the point has evolved and grown to emerge from its minimal ¡-1 state in the first postulate – points with inner breath; into a full super organism, ¡º, living in the ¡+1 world, in the fifth postulate studied here.

2Ð: And it does so through a process of locomotions and changes of waves and forces of communication with other points that define the second postulate – lines with inner breath…

3Ð: And then it has formed planes, defined as social networks that correspond to the third Ðimotion of energy and reproduction, becoming a super organism according to…

4Ð: the 4^{th} postulate of congruence, which defines its relationships with other beings, based in his ‘angle of parallelism’, such as similar beings evolve socially together in groups, complementary ‘left-handed female/right-handed male’ beings come together in couples, and beings which are not equal neither complementary enter either in relationships of entropic perpendicularity, or ignore themselves if their worlds are ‘disconnected’. So the fourth postulate gives us the ‘¡logic rules’ of engagement between forms and particles.

And so we establish an immediate relationship between the fundamental concepts of geometry, the point, the line, the plane, and its congruence or dissimilarity, its relative parallelism and perpendicularity, and the 5 Ðimotions of existence, the point is the mind that perceives first, the first Ðimotion; the line is the point in motion, in cycloid patterns, or two points communicating with smaller ¡-1 parts, as in the Fermion<Boson>Fermion relationship of forces; the plane has ‘holes’, it is a network of reproduced points socially connected into the 3 different species of networks that make a super organism (informative, reproductive and entropic, digestive, moving networks), and all this is ¡logically established according to the relative dissimilarity or perpendicularity between the beings (4th entropic Ðimotion) or social parallelism that evolves the point into a supœrganism, a new whole (5th Ðimotion).

– **Space:** Topologic ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’. This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

* |-limbs-fields-territories<Ø-re=productivebodywaves-workers>O-informative particles-heads-informative class*

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.

– Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3^{rd} class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’. The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

Pentalogic derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scalar plane, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scalar plane or 4th dimension).

**PENTALOGIC OF SCALAR SUPŒRGANISMS DISOMORPHIC WORLDCYCLES**** : **

Pentalogic – also called the Rashomon effect – is simple and yet the most powerful ‘logic element of reality.

Because all what exists is made of a spatial form, of time-motions, spread in 3 scales of reality, its whole, ∆º embedded in a larger ∆+1 world, and made of ∆-1 ‘cellular’ parts, limited in time by its life-death cycle and in space by a membrain, where it sensorial mind-system that connects all those elements, exchanging energy and information with the outer world to enhance its survival chances, [laying what we call the ‘game of exist¡ence’, any event in time, form in space or ‘language-mirror’ that perceives them MUST have 5 Elements, 5 Causes, 5 Variations that we must observe and describe to obtain the whole truth of the issue.

In the entangled pentalogic Universe, it is not possible to separate the 5 elements of the supœrganism of History – its temporal ages, its ‘scalar’ structure divided in human citizen-cells, 3 physiological economic=reproductive ‘blood ‘networks, legal-informative and ‘territorial network of vital space’ or geography, its verbal mind and subconscious collective Gods and its ‘entropic limits’, in time and space, which if crossed will signify its extinction. *As the 5 Dimensions of History work in symmetry like in any other complex ¬∆@st organism.*

So the **‘Disomorphic=equal laws **of all systems derive from the properties of those 5 entangled elements, which need a new ‘pentalogic’ of communication:

__‘ Vital Space‘__ are bidimensional forms of 3 ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 organic functions in a supœrganism: lineal limbs/fields move the system, hyperbolic bodywaves iterate its forms & spheric particle/heads gauge information.

** Time** are types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

** Scales**, co-exist in 3 levels of size ruled by SxT=C metrics gifting organic symbiotic properties to T.œs.

** Minds ** are centers that process information from the outer world, control the internal networks of the system, and

*perform deterministically the 5 survival actions of existence*, regardless of its consciousness. They coordinate and maintain the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind,

*which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

__Entropic limits__**: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆+1<<∆-1. So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism),** ¬;** perception, its mental form, **@;** social evolution, its scalar structure, **∆;** motion its lineal time flow,** T;** and reproduction, its spatial population, **S.**

**The pentalogic method: rashomon truths.**

How we go about to describe scientifically a system, if any of those partial reductions of information suffice to make a linguistic mirror. The answer we provide in this and other papers on 5D is the Pentalogic, entangled method, which expresses with increasing degrees of complexity the elements needed to extract most of the relevant information from the system, without the need to get to the exhaustive (Do)decalogic analysis of the entire world of existence of a given supœrganism. Accordingly we go into a stair of deeper complexity, considering some of those key elements, under the general ‘labelling’ of Pentalogic method, from:

– Monologic: ceteris paribus nalysis of the event or spatial form in its 5 elements as ¬∆@st.

– Dilogic: considering its ST components, perhaps its Stœps of motion and form, or its Si=Te reproductive function/state in static, SxT or dynamic SóT form; or its relative St-information and Ts-momentum that come together to form its ST energy, or its opposite limits of SS-language/form/mind/seed vs. TT-entropy… causing.

-Trilogic: Which is de facto the most important analysis for all forms, as we describe the entity in a single plane of existence with its 3 topological organs of space, T<ST>S, its 3 ages in time, T<ST>S or its 3 co-existing scales, ∆±1. Often we just make a trilogic analysis of the being in a single Space-time plane (T<ST>S), and from the point of view of scales, as this is the bare minimum to define an ∆ST system… to which we might add

Trilogic is thus the basis of all languages beyond, the simplest ‘first order logic’ a causality of falsity and truth, such as if A is false, and from A we deduce B, A->B, B *is false. *As truths are linguistic mirrors of reality a better term than ‘falsity’ is ‘focus’. A good truth is one in which the syntax of the language and its semantic mimics the syntax of the Universe and its meanings. The syntax is a given. Most languages are ‘innate’ ternary syntax of the 3 parts of reality. So all verbal sentences reduce to:

Subject (Fractal point) < Verb (Dimotion=action of space-time) > Object (entropic energy of subject)

F(x): dependent parameter of space) <= > (S=t operand) G(Y): parameter of time

Blue (color of in-form-ation; space) <Green: color of reproduction) > Red (color of energy-motion)

‘All what exists is a ‘form’ that trans-form’ into entropy≈energy back and forth ad eternal SóT, which is the dynamic fractal generator of space-time events, and principle of energy conservation enlarged to its 2 poles whereas the wordings for ‘entropy’. ‘energy’, ‘form’ and ‘information’ require a bit more of understanding before we can define them more precisely.

– Pentalogic: Its limits in time and space (entropic death, membrains, outer world) and its SS-mind, seed, where resides the will to develop its program of time, through the…

Because we play with 5 elements all the time we need to raise the logic consciousness of ‘huminds’ (ab. Human minds), both of the truths of History and the Universe, by *upgrading their logic mind to a higher system of thought that the ‘damned lies and statistics’, placebo truths, lineal thoughts fictions and seflie, childish ego-trips, hidden agendas and wishful thinking that passes today as science… by at least giving him some basic ‘systems’ of inquire of truth. We explained the ABCD-E of the scientific method, which works for Disciplines at large. We want know to introduce a simple method of inquire that works for anything, even *the smallest event in time, form in space or linguistic statement he might hear.

We shall use the pentalogic method constantly when an issue, form or event, or model/theory of reality comes up which is ‘confuse’, or a ‘newspeak’ or ‘disguise’ or selfish agenda, placebo truth or ‘camouflaged system’ to reveal out its full meaning. Reality is pentalogic means ‘the causes’ of reality are often 5. As a system that loses any of those 5 elements does not exist for long. If you loose your skin you die. If you become static, motionless you are by definition death; if something tears into your vital space, you die. If any of the 3 scales where you exist, your cells, your physiological networks that put you together as a whole, or the world external to you, gets sick and unbalanced with you, you die. If an organism become **mindless**, unable to perform the 5 actions of survival – **perceiving** **Information**, to **move** **in search of** **entropic** food to feed and transform it into **energy to reproduce** its parts evolving with other similar individuals to become a stronger **social whole, **you die.

So pentalogic is everywhere and it allow us to find ‘faulty’ theories of reality, very common in science because human minds are monologic – so it is tiresome to observe unending arguments between childish scholars with ceteris paribus causes that want to raise with their egocy (ego=idiocy) to the only cause of reality. I.e. the entropic rock of the sky killed the Dinosaurs, said the physicist – not it was the competition of the Mammal, said the biologist; nay, the gymnosperm flowers, changed and he lost his food, say the botanist, both did contribute… acting on its 5 Dimensions of existence… i.e. mammals who had not attacked dinosaurs before started to eat their eggs, preventing its reproduction, as rats do with their biggest descendants, albatross; flora changed so herbivores couldn’t get their entropy; the sky darkened, so their body couldn’t get their sun energy; and yes the rock blew up their ∆+1 world… and so on*. *Of all those pentalogic structures of the living Universe, needless to say, the most important for each individual superorganism is its program of survival or drives=dimensional motions of life (ab. Dimotions), that ensure its continuous existence. Let us briefly introduce them:

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Si x Ti (s=t) merely states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: ** a, e, ï, œ, û**, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

**A**ccelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), **ï**nformative perception and communication ï, **Œ**:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms **Û**… and social growth into larger wholes called Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In graph we see the action of the main Stientific scales of organisms. Actions are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any ‘Time§pace supœrganism’ (ab.**T.œ**) in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal: ∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1^{st} locomotion, feeding age ->2^{nd} reproduction age ->3^{rd } informative, social age-> entropic death

We analyse reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions),in the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms) or in the maximal range of ¬∆@st of spacetime. Because a system is an entanglement of those 5 components, we need a ‘pentalogic’ to describe how the 5 Dimotions communicate and interact together based in the Disomorphic – equal forms and motions – they all share. While its 5D 3 sequential worldcycles carry the space organism through its þlacental, life and world cycles across 3 ¡±1 scales. So the analysis of those 3±¡ organic elements, through time worldcycles and scales extract all information on the being.

**RECAP.** Stiences study Disomorphic laws of species, each one focused in a scale of the eusocial 5th Dimension, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales, guided by a still, linguistic mind, which projects its smaller mirror images of form in its territorial body waves, creating its fractal scalar structure, broken though by the entropic limits of its perceptive reach.

An organism is a group of similar forms organized by 3 ‘networks’: one provides its ‘clone cells/citizens /atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed & move (digestive system, territory), a 2^{nd} one reproduces the system (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and a 3^{rd} one that provides them with information to guide their reproductive actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple system is the fundamental particle of the universe. As all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those *systems, which reproduces, do exist in the immortal universe. So all systems have an internal or external ‘enzymatic’ system of reproduction (external enzymes reproduce carbohydrates, and enzymen reproduce machines). *This can be seen as a ternary class structure of a ‘body-worker-wave’, and an informative particle-head-upper class moving and finding a vital territory, with a limbic/potential source of its motions, which the system might externalize to obtain the energy to reproduce.

Organisms have parts and wholes composed of 3 elements: ∆-planes of space-time, ∆±¡SóT, ∆ST entangled in 3 organic co-existing ∆±¡ planes. In physical systems they are the ∆-1 quantum plane, ∆º thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 gravitational plane, equivalent in the reduced nested world of Life on Earth to the ∆-1: molecular plane, ∆º organic plane and ∆+1 ecosystemic plane. The absolute dimotion of future survival is eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, as parts must come before; hence they are a relative past, and wholes survive better. A fact humans have forgotten. As individualism is synonymous of chaos=death, it is obvious History, the supœrganism of mankind enters its age of entropic social self-destruction, committing suicide, evolving instead a supœrganism of machines; a tragic problem, which we will study in the analysis of social sciences. And in each of those planes we shall see that ‘spatial information’ and ‘temporal energy’ constantly transform into each other. Space is the perception of form as if it was still, but ultimately is cyclical self-repetitive motion that seems not to change and acquires at larger scale solid forms.

Mental Spaces of in/form/ation *fix the* times=motions of all species. As time becomes the ultimate substance of organisms ordered through scales that give birth to a 5D metric equation, such as smaller systems in space run faster time and life-death cycles. So the speed of time of systems is not the same for all of them, and 3 scales of different speeds form an organism – in man the cellular, individual and social scale. And finally for all this complex reality to ‘work’ in an ordered manner, systems which have a ‘**membrain’** that divides its vital space, from other systems, and are formed by 3 scalar space-times that give them organic nature; have in its highest ‘scale’ of size – that of the membrain that breaks it as a whole from the rest of the Universe a ‘sensorial system’ or mind, which interacts with the external Universe, encloses and orders its internal vital space and communicates with other similar beings, forming larger social organization; hence becomes the mind of the system. We thus talk of a reality made of organisms of a vital body of space-time, self-centered in a mind-membrain, whose language encodes a program of survival for the organism. And all the data humanity has gathered about reality needs to be ‘put within this general template, to make sense of it’.

So 5D refounds sciences in more solid grounds – its 3±¡ elements, ¬∆@ST, which ‘stiences’ study plane by plane of SióTe elements, to which we must add the connecting ‘network’ laws between planes, which we call the ‘5^{th} dimension proper’. It is the philosophy of science, we develop in a series of papers at Academia.edu that will substitute the simpler mechanic view of reality sponsored by physicists, with its ‘mathematical creationism’ and constructivist view; which *reduces the two poles of time=motion to one (lineal time), compresses all the planes of space-time into a single continuum; while only the properties of reality that can be easily fit in a numerical description matter.* A more evolved civilization would start in philosophy of science and the principle of conservation of time and space, and its structure in 5D organic scales and derive from them the fundamental laws of every other discipline; correcting whenever necessary its errors as we do in those papers with the simplest principles of reality as any science mirrors them in its study of its specific scales of beings – the details of those principles.

**Choice of words: space as ‘present time’ and form –time as the primary motion **

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, synonymous of ‘dimensional form’, hence of static space imprinting it on motion. Look around you all what you see are forms in motion. Two parameters from where to start any philosophy of science and descend then to the details of each stience. But form turns out to be in detail, just a cyclical repetitive motion, a ‘closed clock of time’. And so reality is a tug of war between lineal motion or ‘time proper=entropy’ and cyclical motion or ‘mental, perceived form’, space. As both things are so closely connected the choice of ‘wording’ could be the inverse (in fact for very long I used exactly the inverse wording calling cyclical clocks of time=form, and open lineal space=motion, so some texts specially old graphs will talk of ‘informative time clocks’ and ‘entropic or energetic space’).

What this means is that ultimately regardless of choice of ambivalent human wordings, *reality is an interconnected play between those two ‘larger concepts’, ‘form and motion’ and its geometrical shapes, lines and cycles, which mix together into intermediate ‘energy waves’. So to streamline all analysis of reality we must take a choice and call, cyclical form, space, S, and lineal motion, time. *As I said the opposite definition which I took for longer would also be valid as ultimately motion and form, linearity and cyclicality, time and space are two sides in perpetual transformation: S <=>T.

What is wrong is the fact that man, which is clearly a visual, lineal species, reduces both to ‘linearity’ so it considers ‘time lineal’, but also ‘space is lineal’. Man has so to speak a cubist mind that rejects cyclicality. This has also a gender biased cause. Gender is about cyclical females and lineal males, but lineal males dominated so they imposed its half truth, backed by lineal weapons, systems that erase the form of beings.

This makes difficult to choose a duality that pleases mankind. For if we choose lineal time and cyclical space=form, then it turns out that our concept of space as density of form increases the ‘less volume of space’ a system has till the densest informative system, the black hole, likely a top quark star with smallish quarks turning at amazing speeds in cyclical orbits, appears with 0-space. But if we consider cyclical time clocks, our Relativist physicists will cry out, as they use in their equations also a concept of lineal time.

So what to make of all this? Better to write the fundamental equation of the Universe, which I tattooed on an expressionist self-portrait long ago O-Só|-T (or if you prefer |<=>O; $<=>ð, different symbols which express the same. The Universe is a game of two parameters, still form and temporal motion, which merge together into ST-energy. And while the reader will expect according to his worship of digital machines to convert those principles into ‘algebraic numbers of measure’, *digital numbers are about the 3 ^{rd} parameter of reality, ∆-scale; but in a single plane is ALL about TOPOLOGY*’, ‘geometry in motion’. Only when we introduce the 3

^{rd}element, ‘social scales’ made of social numbers, digital measures appear. This, mathematicians know: any digital proof doubles with to a topological one, independent of the first.

*And this introduces the 3*All in all, it is ‘easier that a child enters the kingdom of heavens=knowledge’ and a kid learns typewriting than one scientist who learned with one finger, and a scholar camel who has a hunchback full of egocy makes the intellectual jump from ‘lineal, single time causality, to ‘trinity’ and pentalogic.

^{rd}symmetry of reality: S≈T≈∆; and its ‘trinity’ logic entanglements.What is then truth is simple but to transform human ½ truths it requires a memoriless mind. The truth is that there are 2 formal motions, |xO=Ø, we decide by convention to call time x Space = Energy (spacetime). That reality consists in the eternal transformation and combination of both. And so the dominant element is Ø=iteration, present energy. Here it comes then another trinity of ‘human expressions’ to define them. Past, which we ascribe to systems with lesser form, as we age and wrinkle and get form as life species, so we shall call lineal Time, with lesser form, the relative |-past; and cyclical form, the relative O-future; with forms with motion that iterate and seem not to change, the relative Ø-present. But it is obvious that one can transform into the other. Form can be forgotten and rejuvenate a system. The 3 Time ‘dimotions’ (past, present and future) that correspond to the 3 topologies of Space (|xO=Ø) transform into each other as eternal, and that is the new principle of energy that never dies but combines motion and form, space and time, into infinite beings, which is what the game of existence is all about.

Space does have multiple meanings as it exists in different proportions of form, of information in different states. But ultimately space is a state of present time, due to the reproduction, iteration of its forms that make the Universe immortal as each part of it keeps reproducing. A motion that has a memory of its form, reproduces as motion=time never stops; so the Universe constantly reprouces itself.

As in the Rashomon film where 5 points of view make up a better image of reality, we call any of those analysis the Pentalogic or Disomorphic method of science, which obviously does not substitute the experimental method but put an emphasis on a more precise understanding of the entanglements and relationships and common elements all T.œs (ab. Timespace Organisms) display.

*We can then define the Maya of the senses, as form is really the intelligent synchronicity of all those cycles of space-time, both in quantum physics and in biological cells just the sum of ‘pathways’. It is then how we shall define reality as a ‘series of synchronicities and sequences’ of space-time ‘dimotions (dimensional motions), which we will call also ‘actions’ to correspond it with the fundamental unit of mathematical physics* action, which is also the verbal unit of our conception of the life flow made of actions, which DO have besides motion form. Hence Hemingway told Dietritch, ‘don’t confuse motion – an entropic mindless wandering – with action’ – that has a form, a goal, a direction.

So space is the sum of multiple ‘smallish cyclical time flows’ seen from a larger enclosing membrane as a volume of space – a sum of synchronicities that knot multiple cyclical space-times symbiotic to each other. So they coincide in a ‘single moment of present’. And thus we shall see its sum as a form shaping a mental space. A simultaneous being in space is the persistence of this sum of frequencies of simultaneous flows.

Mathematically this is seen in the ‘emergence’ and ‘resonance’ from multiple time waves of a ‘Fourier function’.

In life from the fact that death and aging is really the loss of synchronicity of those metabolic and circadian paths. In society the same happens when the different organic parts, the informative upper neuronal class, and the reproductive class and the sustain of both – NOT an ill-designed 3^{rd} human class, but the vital territory from where the two classes obtain its energy, loose its balance, as the informative class absorbs all the resources.

All those synchronicities then regulated by ‘larger’ reproductive=economic=thermodynamic networks, legal=informative=nervous gravitational networks make physical, biologic and social systems ‘synchronous vital space-time organisms’.

It is the key to understand logic space: how a series of synchronous cycles of ∆-1, ∆o and ∆+1 scales converge to shape a given seemingly simultaneous species. Those ‘collapses’ at a given discontinuous time of multiple cycles is what we call an organism of reality. The formation of such synchronicities are thus the detailed analysis of the emergence of scales of realityHow different cycles become synchronized to produce the ‘resonance’ that is the emergence of a new scale of reality is the magic of it all. Your mind is just a final resonance of all the activities of your body. Your existence as a whole is the synchronicity of all the feeding processes that hook all the cells to the one-day faster reproductive cycle. The key to those synchronicities is 5D metrics: Size in space x time speed = constant.

Existence of the fundamental particle of informative space, the supœrganism, is related to the synchronicity of all the clocks of a system, to the point that you could call death the desynchronization of those rhythms; often caused by the tearing of the external membrane of the system, which liberates and lets the synchronous tighter cycles to expand and grow in size, slow in time and loose its rhythm. *Entropy, the TT inversion of space as form happens when synchronicity is lost, and the form born and emerged in focus becomes ‘blurred’. *

** **

**MIND DEFINED BY THE S=T GALILEAN PARADOX.**** MIRRORS ORDER LOCAL WORLDS****: LINGUISTIC EQUATION**

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

**Time=change=motion an overview. The 1 ^{st} substance of reality. Past, present and future.**

Time is motion the primary substance of reality. Space is a simultaneous still mind mapping of that motion – which will be erased in due Time. Time is eternal as motion never ceases to create forms, and destroy them, including all the possible spatial forms locked by the ¡logic simultaneity of synchronicity and entanglement.

The ‘1’ first reality is time=motion in its purest TT-entropic form, which the ‘2^{nd} pole’ of reality, the spatial fractal points that measure time and lock in into mental space, oppose; trying to detain it. We can then see reality as a tug-of-war between the two poles of time-motion and still-mind spaces.

In the Universal game between continuous time motions, and simultaneous frames of reference motion becomes locked in synchronicity, creating ‘forms’ is the fact that such duality gives birth to definitive patterns of change, which can be ordered sequentially for all systems of Nature, as ‘worldcycles’ with a series of ‘steps’, from birth to extinction of a space-time system, which becomes then the most ‘elaborated’ understanding of time-motion-change. As change has an order in its cyclical motion from birth to extinction equal for all systems of nature. This concept, the existence of a worldcycle of ‘existence’*, *is then the main finding of 5D studies about time. And so most of the article will be dedicated to its analysis in detail for different species of Nature.

*The second key element *lost in mechanical science due to the use of a digital clock to measure time with a single unit, the ‘second-number’, is the recovery of the 3 ‘relative dimensions’ of time, past, present and future, *because they are absolutely essential elements to the Universe and its ‘organic structure, and evolution’. *

The loss of the need for a ‘conceptual=verbal=logic’ understanding of time in terms of past, present and future causality, NOT only in terms of digital sequences is perhaps the biggest blunder and reduction of reality experienced by mankind in the past half millennium of ‘dictatorship of physicists’ view’ on time over all other considerations. Past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information and its interactions are the very essence of the existential game, humans have completely missed in their faulty analysis of reality.

lineal Time ideally is sequential, causal in a single fashion. Yet real time after many steps always ends in a cyclical loop, logic of a sum of those open steps that finally bend to return to its original existential position-momentum.

So the question about time causality is who knots its cycles, who bends its lines, who curves it to return?

The answer is normally a modular mind that changes between dimotions or an event that require several systems coming into synchronicity or feed-back equations between several elements:

A->B->C->A->B->C is then an ∞ loop, which creates the first STœps of a space-time organism.

So simultaneous synchronicities and parallel communications with other entangled spacetime beings web causality reducing the freedom of single actors to knot events often PENTALOGIC ensembles of ∆±¡, S<ST>T forms in action, informations that collapse together, till a central element with higher communication becomes the focused knot, as a system organizes itself, acquiring form. The minimal of those entanglements is duality. Where A meets D, as D also wants to meet A, and both are complementary flows. So D moves inversely towards AóB.

Both cause the meeting. So time bends with DUALITY, beyond lineal monologic simple human times.

Causality might also be scalar, social. A might try to meet D, a larger supœrganism, which actually causes ‘general energy and information fields’, programming many ∆-1 As… So ∑∆-1>∆0 form chains of social causality. And yet all those causalities in time will have a symmetric topology in space based in the orthogonality of the 5 Dimotions.

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The key ‘unknown’ discovery Galileo missed was the mental nature of space –we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its TT-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Those 2 functions give origin to most spacetime topologies of reality. Absolute relativity implies the mind creates mental spaces =spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

Te explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

**Descartes. 3 Systems elements. **

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

-Then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. *Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles already have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.*

*So besides perception, the 2 ^{nd} field of inquire about the Minds of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:*

*In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:*

*– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its SS-language.*

*– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘TT-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills. *

** **

**UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR OF ALL LANGUAGES AND ITS TOPOLOGIC SYMMETRIES, FOR ¡TS 5 DIMOTIONS**

A key element of Universal mind s is Universal grammar. How a language carries information, which surprisingly happens in all systems in a similar fashion, given the fact that languages after all code the 5 dimotions=actions of existence of all organisms – its ‘sT-locomotion’, TT-entropy, ST- Reproduction, St-information and SS-density of information or mind-mirror. The laws of linguistics thus become laws of a Universal grammar that codes the creation of supœrganisms by controlling waves of similar forms with a ‘grammar’ that is also ternary in structural scales, from ‘phonemes’ that range around the 10^{1-2} level of letters, and can be as little as 5 to code the 5 dimotions of reality, from 5 vowels in human languages, to 5 letters in genetic codes to 4 quantum numbers, or four type of chemical compounds, to more complex systems around the 10-100 scale, from 20 amino acids, to 80 atomic systems; to the next level of combination of words with those vowels, which range in the 10^{3-4} scale. So we have around 2000 words in human languages, from a few thousands to 30.000 genes in the language of evolution of supœrganisms. It is not though the purpose of this paper to define the quantitative elements of languages. While the laws of the Universal grammar will be treated latter.

All systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: Si<=>Te.

Ternary Universal grammar expresses the Ð¡motions in verbal languages and human super organisms.

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its ∞ complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

What languages matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

Red colors (temporal entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (spatial information) for animal visual languages.

**The topological laws of orthogonality between the 5 Dimotions of space-time. **

F(x):time-like parameter <(operandi: action)> G(x): space-like parameter, defines mathematical equations.

A simpler Boolean algebra in computers reduces all to 0 and|; truth or false, ±, and its combined duality gates.

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) x Length (Entropic motion)=XY(st): cross re(product)ion.

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y.

Such asymptotic equations of the form S=T, SS<<TT, S>ST>T, functions are the core mathematical model of the Universe, which can then be considered a function of existence of asymptotic Murkowski’s curves of space-time, under the existential function of perpendicular dimotions of space, time,

X(T), y(S), z(ST) are the 3 dimotions of a single space-time common to all forms that correspond to the 3 axis of Euclidean geometry. Yet because often X(T) is one-dimensional causal lineal motion, y(S) is bidimensional, curved, closed loops of information and z (ST) is a 3 dimensional combination of them, *the simplest case of the 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimotions of light (above) becomes more complex as entropy, TT, Form, SS, become holographic bi or tridimensional beings with different |, O, or Ø-wave geometries. For example a physical force: *

Forces: Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy).

Thus width is the reproductive dimotion born through a dot product of an X x Y = Z event of a 3^{rd} dimension of reproduction that combines the lineal function of motion and the height function of cyclical time space forms.

Form thus also depends on the choice of ST frames of reference: Motion is most likely a lineal or flat plane and information a curved dual dimotion which gives us a 3 dimensional Z function, as St- information ‘curves’ the lineal Tt-motions of entropy.

**The inverse, complex dimotions of the 5 ^{th} Dimension. Orthogonal forms give way to functional networks.**

When we come to the two complex ‘dimotions=actions’ taking place in the fifth dimension between scales, we realize again, there is also two possible ways to travel, through 5D: upwards becoming part of a social whole, ∑∆-1<∆o, as we ‘release’ part of our TT-motion from ∆-1 and become ordered after the transfer that helps the emergence of ∆º. This in physics is misunderstood as the impossibility of a ‘perfect motion machine’ without entropy that leaves no behind any ‘energy for the ∆-1 forms to co-exist. But that is necessary or else ∆-1 would indeed disappear. *So a motion of social evolution, releases entropic motion and increases order in ∆-1 to make ∆o emerge as a whole. Experimental and theoretical considerations shows an ideal 50-50 efficient distribution. *So ½ of the energy is conserved and ½ is used to form and move the upper scale .

The 2^{nd} complex dimotion through 5D scale is then the inverse ∆º<∆-1, seminal seeding. Form is now going down ‘first’ to seed and absorb energy in ∆-1 to form an dimotion of social reproduction.

So the two only complex dimotions – as there are only two ∆±¡ directions in 5D appear as the combination of all others, as they also imply, St, Ts, and ST dimotions (absorption and emission of entropy and information).

Yet when dealing with the complex dimotions of ∆o<∆-1≥∆o reproduction and ∆o>∆+1≥∆o social evolution up and down the fifth dimension, we are NO longer in a 3Dimensional Euclidean space, so we enter into different non-E Geometries of which the commonest ones are those able to ‘multiply’ as they travel in size through 5D the number of parts going down, (Hyperbolic thinning networks as those of biological organisms). And vice versa; the whole must thin out the information of the lower planes to ‘achieve between them’ a synchronicity of time cycles instead of a multiplicity of individualities, and in this manner emerge as a simpler ‘geometry’, which explains why going upwards into whole scales, information thins out to become a simpler whole.

In physical systems the view is then a wave equation that also multiplies its forms and while there are fractal analysis of wave motions (notably in Nottale scalar relativity) we are NOT concerned in those papers so much on the overdeveloped in the age of the digital computer, exact equations of the morphological hows but in the causal whys: what matters to 5D travels we repeat is the integration upwards by social evolution and the multiplication of forms downwards by seminal reproduction.

**Geometry **thus is more familiar with the S<ST>T dimensional motions of a single plane, in its simplest perpendicular Cartesian axis, or its rather commonest, 1, 2, 3 dimensional growth from the flat X-Z, Y—Z sub-planes of TT-motion, bent into cyclical St-information, to reproduce in Z-ST.

And those are the functions space-like and time-ike most often observed by a trilogic Universal grammar of a visual or syntactic mathematical function.

While for the description of** the** full worldcycle, we need to explore the complex 2 functions of 5D, social evolution, going upwards to the future, or reproduction going 1^{st} back to the relative ∆-1 past in inverse motion.

Thus we can define mathematically the 5 dimotions of space time as the product of 5 geometric r=evolutions in 3 5D±¡ planes, with the complex two functions of reproduction and social evolution above.

So we give the following names to the 5 Functions of the diametric of space-time:

X-locomotion, Ts, St, information Y, Reproduction ST=Z coordinates, social evolution, zigzag wave with a first positive growth, vs. reproduction in the opposite past, ∆-1 coordinates.

This function of existence then is the function from where all other functions of the Universe can be draw.

Yet the language of all languages is 5D and its ternary laws of time and space – a language that is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.

It follows that not only mathematics (geometry) is a mother science but also logic (the analysis of the causal processes determine by those Ð¡motions) is even more essential, and further on ‘evolution’, the evolution of forms and functions in temporal patterns summons them all. So those 3 sciences, spatial geometry, temporal logic and its combination, evolutionary theory, are the ‘3 subdivisions’ of general systems sciences, which apply to each science explain it all.

Over them, there is general systems sciences, the science this book can be considered its foundational book (as it formalizes and structures and advances all previous works done on it.) Below them, each specific science studies a scale of social evolution in the universe from the smallest physical systems, to its complex biological organizations and beyond its social organizing systems.

Since science consists in the definition of the type of points of each relative scale of size of reality, from the quantum scale studied by physics, through the intermediate human scales studied by biological and sociological sciences to the higher scale study by cosmology

Once those points are defined, each science studies their 5 actions, which define all its events and forms.

Study of the 3±1 actions: its bits of information, bites of energy, reproductive seeds and grammar.

Yet we study those actions through the 3 scales of size of the system, its bits and bites, normally of the smallest scales of existence, since:

– We perceive with the minimal bits we can process to create the more detailed maps (<i-2).

– We eat sometimes, similar species but break them into smaller parts (i<2). For example we eat meat but break it into amino acids, below the cellular level.

– We reproduce a seed from the lower plane of existence (i-1). So we produce seminal cells and electrons reproduce emitting photons that collide and recreate an electron.

-We communicate with a language of information at the same level we exist (i), in order to create a more complex whole (i+1).

Thus we observe, as in many other laws we will be developing in this book, an infinite number of harmonies between sizes, ages, forms, functions in all scales of existence.

Actions are expressed with bites and bits of inferior scales. We perceive the smaller possible ‘bits’ (<i-2), eat bites of the inferior i-2 scales, reproduce with seeds of the i-1 scale and share energy and information with species of the same scale to create.

The bits of information (i-2), will usually be entities at least two smaller scales of existence. The smaller they are, the more detailed the map made with its ‘pixels’ will be. So we can consider the possible existence of ‘gravitational minds’ that perceive a scale inferior to us.

I.e our eyes perceive light photons, the minimal scale of form. Ants perceive chemical pheromones; computers perceive electronic flows; all of them ‘forms’ of a minimal scale in relationship to the species that perceive.

The bites of energy will be pieces of the same or inferior scale. So we eat ‘living beings’; electrons feed in the lower scale of light; and black holes in stars. Yet once a system feeds it will further reduce what it feeds on another scale to obtain basic bricks to reconstruct once form through ‘2 scales’. So our body reduces food to amino acids, the minimal parts of life. And electrons probably reduce light to its magnetic and electric constants to create their fractal nebulae. And nations that conquer other nations reduce their people, minimal unit of the nation to slavery and take their gold to print their own coins.

So as we move upwards in the complexity of the actions we study there is a ‘growth’ of informative similarity of the bites and bits and a growth in size, such as informative bits are less similar and smaller than the bites of energy we feed. And this pattern continues when we consider the ‘expressions’ of the actions of social evolution and reproduction.

The expressions of social evolution are languages, which are naturally produced by the informative center of the system; except in the case of enzymatic evolution in which the language is external to the species (a species which acts as the reproducer and catalyst of evolution of other species; cells with viruses, humans with machines metal atoms with carbohydrates and so on). So the language is a ‘part’ of the being, often corresponding to an i-1 inner structure, though transported by an external force.

Finally the larger, closer form to the organism is its reproductive seed. And hence by the law of parallelism between species, the ‘bit’ of information for which the organism cares more: small quarks among simple particles, cellular seeds in life; jets of matter in galaxies.

From what has been said on Galilean Relativity, the first big notion is to accept that there are no dimensions of space neither motions of time, but only Dimotions of space-time, and the big question Galileo failed to resolve is ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’, that is why the Earth moves but we see it still, why we see still matter but in detail all are vortices of forces in motion and so on. This is basically a paradox of the mind, which to extract better information and fit it in the small brain reduces its motion into form. So Time-motion, through the still languages of a mind become space perception. And so a new surprising element, the ‘mind and its languages’ must be added to the mix of formal space, perceived as such in the mind and time motions, *the reality of which ultimately all is made*.

** FROM GALILEAN TO 4D TO 5D ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY.**

**Correspondence Limit**

In the graph the stientific method updates the correspondence principle in several ways:

1) Its reason d’être is the ‘coherence’ or ‘entanglement’ between all the scales of reality and its ∆≈S≈T≈@ scale, space, time and mind-language best fit to describe and express the will of exist¡ence of each supœrganism and part regardless of detail IF those 4 legs of the stientific method are met. Which in praxis means:

– T: Sound causality in logic≈verbal time.

– S: experimental evidence, in spatial≈mathematical description.

– Disomorphic parallelism between the 3 ∆±¡ scales of the being.

– @: which can be cast into different linguistic synoptic models for the mind to understand.

Thus the Correspondence Principle gives an ‘expansion’ to the theories of reality that can be truth in as much as it accepts, different linguistic versions as long as they respect as mirrors of a real spacetime event the sound internal structure and a(nti)symmetries between the ∆≈S≈T≈@ elements of the system (scales, topologies, ages and the Universal grammar of its languages).

So for each theory we expand, we shall prove the old ones still work even if they have less precision and are worthy to use as they follow the rule that a simpler theory is ‘easier to grasp’, precisely because it has ‘less detail’ and ‘speed in time perception’ often matters more than ‘precise measure’. i.e. if we are a gazelle we need no precision on what kind of beast is fast forwarding to kill us, just to know there is a beast and we have to run the opposite way. Truth is not about exact digital measure but exact principles.

I.e. 5D explains the meaning of future accelerated time vortices (charges and masses) in the simplest form – Newtonian terms, because it is more evident than the highly precise General relativity. On that view Newton’s concept and theory is NOT worse than Einstein’s. It is the obsession with exact measure, a deformation of the ‘enzymanic task of mankind, obsessed with his use and creation of a digital mind it confuses with the ‘new dogma of truth’, disregarding conceptual clarity what makes physicists despise old simpler, clearer models.

2) An important ad on to the principle is the understanding of the ‘nested’ ∆±¡ Universe structured as a Russian doll, where the growth in ∆+¡ and ∆-¡ range means a larger system will have a ‘faster’ background lineal entropic potential field, which will allow it to be larger in space (S=T duality). This means there are ONLY local limits of cyclical and lineal speed/size for supœrganisms. And c-speed is only the limit of ∆-3 galactic backgrounds.

Special relativity is thus a theory that works for the galaxy, when considered at that ∆-3 scale, a single space-time continuum and the final substrata of ∆º human electronic/visual informative measure. Within the galaxy c IS the space-time rod of measure, which therefore cannot be changed, as IT IS our reference frame and substance of human light>electron>eye perception. And since perception of information happens in stillness, both the electronic emitter and perceiver are entangled in stillness when they transfer information, reason why motion of light is constant, a theme we shall explain latter in detail.

**RECAP. **The nested Universe has only local limits of speed, processing and transmission of information, which is c-speed for the galactic ‘light space-time’. All theories that are sound in its disomorphic principles and ∆=S=T=@ symmetries are equally valid. Precision often looses clarity and speed of comprehension reason why is not necessarily the absolute goal.

So we follow the principle of correspondence; that is, consider classic mathematical physics, the ‘reductionist’ limit obtained by describing reality as if it were a single space scale and a single time clock-Ðimotion; that of light space-time, embodied in its 5Ð metric equation: hc (whereas H is the unit of cyclical information, ð§ and c the unit of lineal motion-distance, t$).

Then the 5Ð model reduces to the 4 Ð model of special relativity (for lineal t$ or ‘inertial frames’ to use Einstein’s jargon) and General relativity (for cyclical ð§, or accelerated frames).

*Yet that valid formalism, which only happens within the ‘galaxy’, has been by lack of a larger model for all the scales of the Universe, and the space-time beyond ‘light ecosystems’ (inside black holes and outside galaxies), expanded to the entire Universe, its entire time and space, and that is where astrophysics got it wrong, and made its mistakes as always happens when a ‘local symmetry’ (in this case the invariance of c-speed or rather to use the proper terminology, light space-time) is converted into a global symmetry=invariance (the c-speed as limit of speed in the Universe).*

Indeed the constants of the galatom should not reign, despite simplifications of astrophysicists, for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… And since larger Russian dolls are ‘weaker’, slower in their energy and less curved, the cosmological constant indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think off, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe.

In such a wider model, also the c-speed as a constant perceived by our h-spin electronic minds, doesn’t necessary hold for other systems of informative perception not based in spins and light (hc metric). We know another possible system in a larger ‘scale’ of the Russian doll Universe, outside galaxies, connected to black holes, which might be based in a faster than light neutrino background, which would be invisible for a light-being, seems to be indeed emitted in copious numbers in blazers and quasars, and as such a system of quantum perception of this ‘quantum potential background’ by heavy fermions and ‘black atoms, would see the speed of light varying, and likely will apply the general law of waves, which ties speed and frequency… )

What we mean by all those new concepts BEYOND the correspondence limit of a single space-time light background, should be more clear as we unfold the model of 5Ð:

When we expand reality to the canonical 5 entangled elements, fractal space, scales, cyclical time, linguistic minds and the entropic destruction of it all; and the 11 Dimensional isomorphisms of all supœrganisms built those elements, its 3 scales, 3 time ages, 3 topologies and its 2 membrain’s parameters, of course things paradoxically become more simple ad harmonious, but it requires both to vitalize mathematical models by defining non-Euclidean, ‘fractal points’, line-waves, congruence ¡logic paradoxes, and topological networks=non-Euclidean planes, to use logic, verbal conceptual upgrading of all those concepts and the entangled, pentagonal ¡logic of all the parts of the systems and its different languages of perception of organic and causal properties otherwise hidden in the simplicity of the present first principles of physics.

The new world once you take the necessary energy to jump over the threshold of learning the basics of it, will show time-permitted, a clarity and economicity.

It will be difficult for physicists to walk through 5Ð, as for a rich man in the parable’s of Jesus to abandon the learned unproved memorized dogmas of 4Ð formalisms, with its single clock time, its continuum space, its c-speed limits that apply only to that continuum light space-time in which galaxies live, and further on accept that the proper way to start defining the Universe is NOT with the V=HoD, ‘God-like equation’ of lineal expansion but with a bit more of conceptual, ‘organic sophistication’, defining NOT a locomotion but a supœrganism, the one physicists truly study in all its entangled complexity much larger than that of its ‘smallish human part’ not to speak of the humind – the galatom.

We dedicate the 3 posts on astrophysics in the second line to study the super organism of physics, the galatom, in which we exist (the ¡±3 organism extending in the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales). In the fourth line dedicated to each scale, we shall expand its analysis. In those posts we will study its structure tuned to the 2 ‘main elements’ of any system that exist as a fractal 5D super organism, tracing a world cycle.

- We study the main supœrganism of physics through its 3 ∆§cales aptly called the ‘galatom’.
- We study its Worldcycle of timespace, through its 11 Ðimensional Isomorphisms, which describe the galatom from birth as a seed of dark matter, to its death back to dark matter form in the second post
- As as we must ‘correspond’ epistemologically to the known-known knowledge developed through centuries by the subconscious collective of the humind – all theorists before us – regarding physics we have crafted also a post on mathematical physics, as it is the only language huminds have so far used to describe physical systems, putting in relationship its main equations with the 5 Ðimotions and 11th Ðisomorphic elements (3 topologies of space, 3 ages of time, 3 scales of size and 2 parameters of the @-membrain), of the galatom.

**From 4Ð to 5Ð: restarting physics.**

‘Leibniz was right there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch’ *Einstein*, on the tasks achieved in this paper.

As Einstein said to develop the principles of relational space-time, mankind will have to redefine every concept regarding space and time, past, present and future, dimension and motion. *And then as Planck put it, learn them. *I don’t think it will; from personal experience, to its own loss.

As soon AI or nuclear particles will extinguish her on the 2 limits of overdrive of entropy or digital form (TT vs. SS) that become the ‘two forms of death’ of any system of the Universe. Or else 5D would have been on the mouth of every scholar since I first tried to pass it to the world in the 90s and then again in the 2000s. Still it is worth to try a last time. So I have spent a year crafting those papers and will take it slower now but bring those of biology and physics to a minimal standard this 2020, when according to all ‘cycles of historic entropy’ we enter in the post-third crash age of global wars and fast degeneration of the species.

If 5D doesn’t go anywhere the usual suspects will be obvious: egocy, routine and the idolization of simpleton 4D ideas and its masters, which even today when it is evident they are not good enough to explain reality are stretched ‘as far as c-speed goes’ with ad hoc solutions – instead of seeking new models elsewhere.

But egocy goes hand in hand with praxis: mankind only cared to understand nature to control and manipulate it. And for that all what is required is correct measures extended into the future to anticipate the motions of matter, not complex models to explain why matter moves.

It is then necessary to distinguish true knowledge of the causes of reality as a block of time from a ‘slow picture’ of reality that do ‘forecast’ that future just because worldcycles of time repeat themselves; even if to make those worldcycles we need from our distorted perspective a lot of epicycles:

In the graph the concept of a block of time. If our ‘scanning of information’ lasted not a second as the human mind mapping does to create its spatial stillness but a year, we would see the image of a block of time for the earth, void of detail as a disk, and wonder if we know it all about the Earth, a mere disk. So the perceiver of the whole Universe is actually a very slow thinker and a very undetailed dumb perceiver. We humans are in that sense ‘blocks of time’ in the perception of the much faster gravitational scalar plane between galaxies, v>c and we see in simultaneity a block of time, at that faster scalar plane in our slow view with no detail. So all minds perceive a block of time in the limit of its slow, dumb; subjective, perceptive definition of vacuum space.

So the whys are no needed for praxis when data and errors can be refit ad hoc in repetitive patterns. So, we could refit the fifth dimension in the ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ of 4D physicists. This would help through egocy to get better reviews from them. But those kind of patches, which are constantly put on the scaffolding of physics, since Leibniz realized there are ∞ time clocks in the Universe but academia stick with Newton, would *be an insult to the intelligence and beauty of the Universe, I respect more at this STage of my life than man’s doodles*.

The reason of these papers is to make a beautiful mirror image of the Universe as it is, even if it sounds like I am paraphrasing the arrogant Kepler: ‘God is a clocker that waited 5000 years for an intelligence like his to understand his clock work’. But I am not. *Since while 5D understands better reality than 4D is still only a mirror hence a partial view of a Universe constantly creating infinite monads-mirrors with different languages. So all what we can do is to refocus those mirrors through non-AE… to get a better picture. But to say that a Nikon understands nature because it can picture it is an overstatement. *

So we restart according to the correspondence principle with the concept most worthy of all those discovered in Relativity – that *time without space is a mere shadow, and both are always associated together. Even if we as humans only see one side of it. I.e. we see the Earth still even if we know it moves. *

**Present Time Space is the simultaneous measure of smallish time cycles.**

We define space as a form created by the concept of simultaneity of space (physical space since Einstein is defined in those terms) vs. the sequential, longer flows of time that make simultaneous ‘space’ a slice of the whole time flow.

Space then is connected to the concepts of entanglement and synchronicity of multiple time cycles seen in a single quanta of time as a ‘simultaneous present’ from a point of measure (the observer of Einstein’s cones).

It is from that concept of space as present from where we took the choice of space as form, to follow the principle of correspondence between previous theories (4D) and new theories that enlarge the previous view (5D). But because humans still hang on a lineal ‘concept’ and don’t understand cyclical, informative properties some precissions must be made.

The shortest time is a quanta of mind space of time-thought, a moment of present. Space as present time, different for each species according to its ‘5D metric’ speed of processing information accounts for the key concepts of synchronicity and simultaneity which is what truly defines space, and its supœrganisms – regions in which each quanta of the mind-time is synchronized with those of the body and limbs of motion. So from humans with its second quanta of thought, second of heart beat and second of steps to De Broglie’s interpretation of quantum physics in terms of the synchronization of the wave, inner clocks of the particle and the fields, present space structures the ‘workings’ of all universal organisms.

**NO Separation between past, present and future. Reversal effect of growing in size: blocks of time.**

Form in space is cyclical motion time that returns to its zero sum point and appears as form for a larger perceiver, according to the same SxT=C metrics. Indeed, if we grow In size then we slow down enough our perception of time, to see instead of a point moving, a ‘length of time curling into a cycle’. Further on the cycle will appear if we see it from enough distance as a fixed point of space, and hence immutable – a block of spacetime, a complete worldcycle. *This is how minds create the perception of static simultaneous space around us in what truly is a soup of quantum motions.* Then we can formulate the concept of God, as the immutable mind that sees all the time and all the space, in its fixed, slow form, as a larger and slower whole. So God as the mind of the whole, infinite Universe is paradoxically a *fixed image of thought of the entire reality – a theme we explore in more detail in ‘Universe & mind’*.

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scalar plane of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scalar planes. Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us. Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.

In the fractal, scalar Universe, concepts, which seem impossible to define in simple logic terms in the 4D single scalar plane continuum, become understandable. Such is the case of consciousness, which is merely the co-existence in a bundle whole, of the different type of self-sensations of the being through its scalar planes of simultaneous space-time:

The highest scalar plane of reality that of the mind, self-perceives the ‘extremes’ of its existence within the limits of its first ‘galatom’ parts – the particles of the atom, where ultimately resides the e-motions of being, and its largest possible world, the external galatom in which its world co-exists.

Modular scalar perception of all those levels simultaneously gives us the sensation of consciousness as an integration of all of the scalar levels of ‘linguistic still perception’ in space and e-motions in time…

I.e. you feel a sensation of gravitational weight-pressure, a visual photonic image of reality, an electronic verbal mapping of memorial storage of time processes, a chemical sensation of wellbeing between cold and warm – Many modular parts of your whole sensorial being through your super organism in space, but also many scalar parts of your whole being, through the ‘sensations’ that conform the whole mind, as all those scalar planes are part of the pan-psychic Universe.

Consciousness is that the co-existence or integration of all those scalar planes and parts into a ‘single-point’ of space-time that integrates all as a consciousness. This integration will then give birth to your ‘RELATIVE’ speed of time-existence, one second-thought for man to integrate all its levels, that will become your quantum of time-space perception – your ‘Dasein and being’…

In relativity (4D formalism) ‘the separation of past, present and future is an illusion’ (Einstein). It depends on the observer ‘speed of thought’:

A slow mind could see the entire orbital motion of the Earth as a ring simultaneously seeing past, present and future. God in Scholastics could see all time past, present and future – so he must be the slowest of all thinkers

** **

**S=T DIMOTIONS. GALILEAN RELATIVITY **

Let us go a bit further in the nature of spacetime Ðimotions focused on its ‘spatial-formal element’. We cannot be by all means exhaustive, so we shall introduce the key concept of physical locomotion, relativit, leaving the mathematical analysis of St-particles, Ts-fields and ST-waves and forces for the papers of 5D physics.

**Errors of Galilean relativity; Lineal speed and creationism.**

*The restricted formula of time-change as motion of space.*

The image physicists have of reality is restricted by the concept of lineal time and a single dimotion of entropy, which also limits the solution of physical questions and introduces errors as the cosmological big-bang or the evaporation of black holes, mentioned before. To this we add the concept that only mathematical properties matter.

It comes all from Galileo. Physicists spatialized time, defined with a single dimension, as a parameter of changes in motions and space, t=s/v.

This limited study of only one type of change is forgotten, creating conceptual errors, such as the fantasy of time travel (as physicists don’t realize there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe and so all time travel is local, within a certain organism as in the processes of death.)

When physicists confront the phenomenon of time, they do so only from the perspective of spatial change, a very limited part of the entire realm of time=changes. And so both, Galilean relativity and Einsteinian relativity are theories about the motion and Entropy of space, not a theory about all types of Time-change as this work is. And when someone like Hawking affirms that time travel is possible because time-motion gets to zero in a black hole, he merely forgets he is speaking about the time-motion defined in the previous formula, t=s/v or its self-similar Einsteinian version not about the sum of the infinite time cycles of the Universe that remain unchanged. So T=0 means only a system ‘STOPS’.

Those are limits to time studies *in any physical theory, from Galilean to Einsteinian Relativity. *

Today, when Physicists talk about time they talk about is a parameter, t, which appeared first in an equation of speed, V=s/t, that Galileo found when studying translational change in space or ‘spatial movement’. Furthermore, because that rate of change in space is considered infinitesimal, V=ds/dt, they talk about present changes in space, which Einstein defined with his concepts of ‘present simultaneity’.

This was fully understood by painters, who started to paint simultaneous, present time, in a single bidimensional space, as the sum of fractal movements (Duchamp’s staircase models and Picasso’s cubist perspective), but surprisingly enough the people who grasped with more difficulty the concept of spatial, present simultaneous analysis of time, were the same physicists that had invented this model of time analysis.

Moreover, ever since physicists have denied there are many other ways in which time=change happens in the Universe, beyond the limited study of ‘changes in speed’ that Physics analyzes. This has been explained many, many times to Physicists, since Bergson and Poincare explained to Einstein and Minkowski that they were ‘spatializing time’, or rather analyzing how vacuum space changes in time, (so Poincare could establish with Topological analysis self-similar equations to those of relativity).

*Thus Locomotion, Ts, and its derivatives cannot study ‘internal change’ (S) and transformations of states, from Ts to St (i.e. gas to solid, 1 ^{st} to 3^{rd} age etc). Physicists resolve this studying those other States of time with different equations. So the praxis of it doesn’t suffer, but the philosophy of time-space does. *

Moreover there are many other T.œs besides vacuum space that change in time and as systems become more complex in information, its function supersedes form and then mathematics is a cumbersome way to describe it but worldcycles of time still hold its simple sequences of change, between S and T states. We humans change in time our morphology (not our speed). Evolution changes in time the form of many species. Time is thus a synonymous in most sciences of a change in form, in the in-form-ation of species. And this type of informative change is basically ignored by Physics. This shows a general misconception of the meaning of Time in Physics, which has been termed as ‘simplistic and reductionist’ by philosophers of science. Because indeed it is.

Time is philosophically defined as ‘change’ and divided in the study of ‘translational change’, which is carried out by Physics, and the study of ‘morphological change’; which is carried out by Biology. In that regard, Galileo defined only a limited type of time-change, translational change, with his equation, V=s/t. He ‘spatialized Time’ (Bergson), reducing the study of Time to a single process of change, movement.

*Galilean Relativity: the error of Cartesian, continuum space.*

The 2^{nd} error of relativity, the continuity of space-time is caused by a misunderstanding of the curved, geometrical nature of time and its dimensions, caused by the Cartesian plane of lineal time: Te draw a clock-cycle of temporal information we need at least 2 dimensions, as morphology requires form, in-form-ation; and so lineal time with a single dimension cannot study it. Thus when Descartes and Galileo simplified time into one dimension, he eliminated the analysis of morphological change and information, the 2^{nd} dimotion of the Universe, from most disciplines of science.

All cycles have 2 directions or dimotions to complete its form. In the pre-scientific age, those 2 dimotions of relative past and future were understood as the 2 sections of curved times cycles. So times are indeed, as Einstein thought, curved, to the point of closing themselves into causal cycles that return all beings to their origin, but they have 2 dimensions, height and rhythm. So it does space. Each local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creating fractal in-form-ation (masses and forces in physical, evolving information in biology, etc.). Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create a form.

Entropy consists in an amorphous, relative surface of undifferentiated quanta, a plane without form, which the creation of time cycles shapes into information and makes it recognizable, thanks to its 2 dimensions. Both geometries, cycles of time and planes space, are bidimensional. When both systems merge, the sum of fractal, bidimensional fields of time and Entropy, create only one more, 3^{rd} intersecting dimension of combined time-space, *width,* which has a rhythm of temporal movement, the 4^{th} dimension of time=change that we observe as *reality*.

Unfortunately the error of Descartes and Galileo, which simplified cyclical time into a single-dimensional line, had as a first consequence the reduction of time in human sciences to a lineal duration, measured with a scalar number, similar to the way we measure space. It is what philosophers of science call the ‘spatialization of time’. Now spatial time becomes a secondary parameter to calculate spatial and energetic motions and processes – not an objective of knowledge in itself. Accordingly, Galileo defined time as a measure of ‘translational, spatial change’, of movement in lineal space or speed (V=S/T), simplifying time into a lineal number, defined in terms of movement and space.

**Galilean Paradox**: **S****ó****T: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time****: 5 Universal** **Dimotions**

We can trace the beginning of physics and comment on its I-logic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, *principles derived of the nature of space and time, not magically produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.*

Motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5^{th} dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is *a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotionss.*

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable Si=Te, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth *dimension* (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe)**; **whose study is both mathematical, the main science *that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous* Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main stience of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

As all is time&space, the 2 experimental primary mirror-stiences of time&space become the most important to extract the Disomorphic=equal laws of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

What neither mathematicians nor physicists fully understand (though some inroads in abstract were made through the Noether’s concepts of symmetry) is that each stœp of a method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

5Ð is a model of Absolute relativity, as it adds to relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time dimotion of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric equation’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word is ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’, proper of all minds that model reality from its p.o.v. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

Physicists made Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their measure theory, but they failed to study its deep implications for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind:

All spaces are mental spaces, as all is motion we perceive in stillness in the ‘factory’ of the mind, how we can and will build a proper meta-physical theory of the mind.

** **

**SPECIAL RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED**

**Real v. Mind spaces. Lorentz transformations. ****Forces as Languages. Motion in space as reproduction: S=T.**

5D differs strongly from 4D with its simplex lineal time, single space-time scale and single mathematical language in the comprehension of the Universe. Since all forces carry information and hence must be considered also languages of communication between atoms, particles and galaxies of the higher scale. For that reason when we study galaxies as supœrganisms, it is necessary to introduce forces as languages.

Atoms as supœrganisms communicate information through forces as they build a social entangled, ‘parallel’ system, which explains realistically the Lorentz transformations. In the ∆-4 ‘quantum potential scale’ of faster than c speed to particles that are to communicate, as all systems that emit information – think of you walking with your friend while talking, must according to the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry exist in parallel. So particles first communicate in the background neutrino scale and when they are in simultaneous, equal distances, they emit over the neutrino ‘line’ that measures only distance, a higher level of information (neutrino theory of light, first considered by the true master of quantum physics, Mr. De Broglie, before the Bohr Mafia took over with its egocy theories, now resurrected as proofs keep mounting on his realist view of quantum physics, and the needed synchronicity of any organism in its 3 ‘St<Ts>ST-planes’ ( particle, quantum potential field and wave).

The scalar Universe builds organisms by reproducing all its scales from the bottom up. When you move your hand you are not moving (solution to the Galilean paradox of relativity, and the paradox of Zeno) but reproducing your information in the next adjacent topological space-time. And then you keep building new layers.

This in physics starts with the entanglement of distances in the faster than c quantum potential through emission of a neutrino that localizes other particle. Thus both become entangled in parallel distance, which when we try to measure it in the ∆+1 human scale where the macro-organisms are seemingly moving respect to each other, as we cannot perceive the ‘go and stop’, wave-particle, break and move way in which particles and waves move (but when observing electrons – see graph) we indeed see how they move, stop change direction and advance as in zigzag through a kind of Brownian motion) we need to introduce the special relativity elements for the description of a smooth continuous motion that discharges the stop and go. In reality there are not such paradoxes that distort the real spacetime of particles. It is like a movie: as electrons stop to perceive as particles information and move as waves, measure is always done between stopped electrons, the emitter and the observe, fixed by an infinite, non-local ‘gravitational string’, so they can perceive and measure, and so ‘we do not add’ (Michelson experiment) speeds, as both are in stop position.

It is the same effect that let us perceive motion in film, when in fact light only ‘projects information’ in stop and then ‘go’ (it is a Universal law of ∆st as information is the still form of a time-cycle of motion); but as it is so fast (so it is the electron stop, emission or reception of information, and go, wave state, left upper graph) we DO see the stop and go as continuous light ‘camera motion’:

Thus this means all relativity is false? No; it is just the ∆º macroscopic translation to our scale where motion seems continuous of the discontinuous, detailed stop and go way in which electrons and photons feed and perceive light. So it works as measure tool, but we must stress that from the ∆-3 p.o.v, of electrons the Universe looks very different with no spooky effects of length contraction and time dilation (of its internal clocks), as those are ‘virtual effects’ biased by the human/mechanical electronic mind:

Without having the perspective of multiple scales, with different time speeds and forms of discontinuous and continuous measure, from the human scale of continuous ‘bulk’ perception, both speeds should ad (Galilean relativity), and so the earth’s different orientation of motion respect to the sun’s light should change the speed at which we perceive light, adding or resting to c. Yet because our eyes or mechanisms of light measure are electronic, entangled at quantum particle in a stop state with the electron that emits the light beam we DO measure two stop emitters and receivers of light. So it is always c-speed with no dragging.

So as we move, we build up in our ‘imprinting’ of the different scales of which we are made. And this implies that the more ‘scales’ of complexity we are made of, there will be slower speed, so a new symmetry between scale and speed of time, ∆≈T appears: the more complex and ‘dense in information’ a system is, the less speed it will have. Reason why the maximal speed of the ‘perceived human’ ∆±3 Universe is c-speed, since light is the first scale of information we form departing from the initial neutrino ‘line’ that entangles the particles in the background below light spacetime.

This scale of speeds therefore shall be roughly a decametric scale, as the ∆§cales between planes of space-time (see our paper on non-Euclidean geometry and non-Aristotelian algebra) are decametric scale. And this is indeed the case. Since the maximal speed without distortion of form of electrons, the next scale after light is around 30.000 km./s (1st Bohr orbit), the speed of the next scale of Hydrogen atoms in gaseous state is around 3.000 km. s and we can keep building up scaling up in the organic ‘branching’ of molecular matter to the human 30 km. second speed of space-time.

All this gives us a simple re-interpretation of the formula of speed in terms of information: V=S/ð which uses the term for cyclical time, ð, as opposed to lineal time, t (while for space, S is cyclical space and $ lineal space, though we could also write |-t O-t, O-s and |-s)… whereas the less ð-cyclical time information the faster the perceived speed, and so when ð->0, past the level of light information, the first scale we perceive, speed tends to infinite, reason why the invisible ∆=4 scale of gravitation is non-local form a human observer, of infinite speed. Wee can also in complex pentalogic analysis of locomotion in physics (considered latter when we complete the papers of physics in pace and physics in time), perceive such non-local speeds as a relative motion to the past of an ‘antigravitation’ or ‘antiparticle’ wave, whereas the ‘past motion’ of the particle (as in Feynman diagrams) is compensated by the v=s/t interval to the future, cancelling each other for a present motion that creates the sensation of a simultaneous gravitational present space. All the previous considered analysis are ‘right’ as they just as in the case of the different ways to represent gravitational forces, points of view of pentalogic. So if we group those pentalogic views in duality.

St vs. Ts: the point of view o null f information, gives us infinite speed for non-informative particles.

Ss vs. TT: The point of view of relative logic future information vs. relative entropic past, cancel each other for a single present.

ST: So finally we observe that the background gravitational scale forms a present simultaneous space to light-species that ‘live’ above it. This happens for all other supœrganisms where a ‘background space forms a present sheet, in which to imprint information carried in simultaneity, giving birth to its ‘quanta of space’.

Present space then is the fastest, lowest scale of a supœrganism, which appears for its slower higher scale beings as simultaneous given that 5D metric makes their SxT=C mental quanta a 10^{n} times slow (where the n power depends on the degree of complexity of the next scale in terms of number of entangled dimensions, as there are ‘one-dimensional, bi-dimensional, 3D up to 5D minds ;¡ logic complex themes not dealt here).

Inversely the forms of maximal density of information are still and so we can consider that minds are the points of maximal density of information of any given supœrganism, which appear still for all the internal parts of such organism.

Thus *mass is a measure of the density of information of a physical particle, which increases as its 5D St-vortex accelerates inwards, past the c-event horizon, increasing to faster than c-speeds in the ∆-4 gravitational scale of * the black hole, which therefore appears as the self-centered still point of the galaxy, and the brain is the still center of our organism, reason why we see through the mind a still universe, and become the self-centered point of our frame of reference. So we can calculate the ‘existential force’ of a particle according to its Mxa, ð-cyclical speed, maximal for the black hole related to its existential momentum, SxT or speed of reproduction that gives ultimately its predatory power. Indeed, black holes are the top predators of maximal existential force of the galaxy, so when they collide with any other species, they prey on it, as what comes out of the collision is a new black hole or a larger one, which has devoured its mass. So when a baby black hole is born, according to Hawking’s 5D equation of ‘information’ not of entropy, it grow exponentially as it cools down: ∆M (Bh)= C /ÑT.

In our mental Euclidean space we measure everything along the 3 relative coordinates of that Euclidean space, provided by the 3 dimensions of light, as if they were still – dimensions that have also a vital meaning, height for information from an advantage point of view, length for locomotion and its SxT combination for reproduction; which are not only mental spatial dimensions but very much organic dimensions, since when a system evolves morphologically through ontogenesis, those are indeed the dimensions for the vegetal and animal pole, for the growth in parallel of reproductive cells, so you get fat in width, you grow in height of information and you move forward – themes those treated on the papers on biology and space. In the next graph we see a resume of the first scales of physics, where the neutrino line feeds the creation of light, which ‘bends’ the line into frequency thus reducing its ‘speed-distance’ by a – ct element which is input in our Lorentz transformations to adapt it to our view from above, and further on the 3 dimensional motions of light that for a photon are its vital dimensional motions of ST-reproductive speed, St-information and TT>Ts-feeding.

Needless to say as in the case of the inversion of dimensional motions between prey and predator, plant and animal, which balance each other, so plants have down the brain, up the feeding flat leaves, and animals inversely up the head that perceives light as information, down the feet, and one breathes O2 and the other CO2… the inversion of neutrino vs. light vs. electronic dimensional motions both in Euclidean and Ox|=Ø topological varieties balance each other, So as the universe reproduces its waves of formal motions it keeps balancing expansive and implosive, lineal and cyclical, up and down, ˙∆=S=T=@ symmetries all the way to the 25% 3 Dimensional balance of matter vs. 75% one-dimensional expansive entropy between galaxies that explains why ‘Brooklyn is not expanding’ (: and the big-bang is not the birth of the whole Universe.

**RECAP**. 2 consequences of the scalar, cyclical nature of space-time are cyclical big-bangs in all scales of reality; and scalar disomorphisms between galaxies and atoms.

The cyclical, fractal big-bang, is the last TT-entropic dimotion of a galaxy, 1 of many supœrganisms of the immortal, informative, ∞ universe, sum of all ¡ts other fractal parts made to ¡ts image and likeness. So the same laws that describe the Universe apply to every ‘space-time Stience’ & supœrganisms, its parts and wholes– different variations of the same vital game that range from a human being, to a crystal mind, to an ant. So we can compare a galaxy, both with an atom, as + top black holes are equivalent to + protons and the halo of negative strangelets, are equivalent to electrons; but also when observed in greater detail with a living gala-cell, as stars are ribosomes producing middle black holes and planetoids become micro-black holes and strangelets that fuel as mitochondria do the homeostatic temperature that activates its larger forms. So if humans produce them in accelerators searching further proofs of the big-bang Earth III will find earlier its destiny (see paper Earth III and entropy) and migrate to the protein-like Halo –‘membrane’ of the galacell, made of lineal strangelets.

Those comparisons work because all systems are space-time organisms. So a galaxy centered in a black hole is similar to an atom with its electronic cover, and self-centered nucleus accumulating most of its informative high speed vortices of St-mass, while our existence happens in the irrelevant intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged. So what the galatom IS the fundamental ‘bio-logic’ particle of physics, but also follows the Disomorphic laws of any bio-logical, social, organic system.

We study the 3 scales of matter, which we considered from the perspective of its ‘supœrganisms in space’ in the paper of ‘physics in scale’, from the perspective of time. In this paper we are more interested in crafting with the little information we perceive on the galaxy its worldcycle from its seminal seeding by a giant mother-galaxy through its black hole emissions of faster than c, dark entropy through its 3 ages and final TT-quasar death.

**The next stage of mathematical physics: to input the 5 ^{th} dimension.**

The advance from special relativity to absolute relativity is complex as it requires something physicists lack – conceptual depth in verbal, logic causal thought, to introduce the whys we have just sketched here: the mechanisms through which *the ‘magic of Galilean paradox’ – the fact you see still the world and act as such when it is moving at huge cosmological speeds do NOT affect you.*

I haven’t solved them thoroughly and the work I did 30 years ago is as so much of my 5D research lost during the world ‘travelling years’ of my difficult life. Blame it on scholars that did not want to fund 5D research then or in my indifference to pure thought when there were so much more important analysis of ‘History and Economics and human survival’, which suicidal biblical capitalist go(l)d cult(ure)s won’t even hear and my subsequent indifference to the ‘corrupted systems’ of mankind. Still I did some inroads and so I will leave here some tips of what is needed just in case future researchers want to complete it. In essence the question here is how to translate in reverse through the ‘complex Non-Euclidean’ Geometry between scales that ‘distorts’ one to get into the other the stop and go, position-motion stœps of particles into a ‘continuous’ large scale picture which is what we perceive.

The excellent work of 4D has done exactly that in inverse, but in the process it has erased the stop and go of particles, which we believe is a continuous process transforming it into the Lorentz Transformations and lost in the change the ‘meaning’ of the vital, organic relationships between particles.

Visually the key to the whole concept is the orthogonality between S and T states, which also explains why Cartesian, Complex and Hilbert spacetimes are so good to mathematically mirror the process. Because all forms of motion are stop and go, a system that moves through reproduction has a beat, ST-wave reproduction>Ss-top informative particle and at that point it can and often does, change its angle for the next reproduction orthogonally. Because motion is reproduction, a particle that stops reproducing can also stop in ‘his tracks’ at any time transition from T to S states*.*

Another way this stop might happen as in black holes is when the lineal motion accelerates and curves (curvature is then the Still S-view of an accelerated vortex, which explains the mathematical transition from Newton to Einstein via Poisson): So the lineal c-speed becomes a cyclical speed and finally it collapses into a ‘dense particle point of light’, in a process mimicked in the ∆-3 scale by electrons that are dense light-photons nebulae, as galaxies are dense light-star nebulae. So all those mechanisms easily explain how a system can stop and go and then to explain why a form can merely see everything stop when it is moving, the movie mechanism explains it all in reverse: imagine each picture is the same picture (as each particle reproduced is the same), and we only see the ‘stop position’ not the transition that moves the picture from an ‘orthogonal’ perpendicular perspective. We will see the entire movie as a stopped single frame, from the orthogonal far away position of our different 5D scale.

And this is natural because when the movie moves-changes frame as perception of information requires stillness we would see only blurred, ‘dark space’.

**The creation of full organisms: Trilogic of ST-waves+ Ts-particle-envelopes +Ss-ingularities-spins.**

**Full T.œs**:** St<ST>Ts: **In the particle scale things are pretty similar to our world, and as that is our aim – to reveal the organic, natural life of physics, we can explain it simple. It requires though certain basic ‘realist’ mechanisms for the whole thing to be kept together, along them, ‘synchronicity’ between the clocks of the wave-moving and particle-static states, as De Broglie already noticed. Because if those synchronous states which ‘lock’ the different scales of wave-particle-field into a co-existing harmonic being, disarray the system breaks and dies. The best known case is the Bohr earlier picture of an electron orbit that must have a natural number of smaller waves to form the circle as a ‘present’ repetitive form such as the ‘longer circle’ and the sum of smaller waves always fall in the same place. This is the meaning of standing waves which have a number of waves that naturally seek ‘a stable present’ state to repeat its form, as Nature seeks always the balance of present S=T states of harmony between form and motion.

If the ‘particle’ is the envelope of the wave, it must be formed by both moving lineally with the wave and surrounding the wave as it moves backtracking its motion.

So, in quantum physics the particle moves at twice the speed of the wave, P(v) =2 W(v), to have time to close the circle, and become the ‘Ts-biological membrane’ of the vital ST-body-wave.

This we measure as the angular momentum of the wave. But then a ‘trilogic organism, which has always a ‘membrane’, a vital body and an sS-informative center. And this center is formed by the ‘collapse’ of the angular momentum of the whole wave into a singularity momentum, (h/2).

In this manner a ‘full particle’, such as an electron does have 3 numbers needed to describe, its ST-existential energy, or bodywave, its angular momentum= Ts-enveloping membrane, and a singularity, SSpin. And then *to coordinate its motions with other particles a ‘social’ magnetic number, St.*

This gives us it, 4 positive dimotions. And we can see it in space as parts of an organism, ∑St: magnetic momentum [Ts-:angular momentum: membrane<ST:energy: standing wave >SS-pin/mind]; or in a time picture, we will see waves that collapse into particles becoming electronic particle-points.

This is the ‘densest’ most complex, full-done particle-wave-field organism.

**ST: Only waves:** In the other limit of simplicity, a water wave travels twice the speed of its group; so *a group-particle envelope is NOT formed AND the lineal wave dominates the cyclical motion of its ∆-1 micro particle state that do NOT structure a ‘whole’ envelope to form a macro-particle state: .*

Thus the existence of a particle in the classic sense implies NOT only the existence of an ∆-1 particle as in water waves, but rather a *collapsed ∆º particle with an ‘active magnitude’ in the external membrane of the wave, which we consider to be the case for the collapsing wave of the quantum scale, as we can measure then an ‘angular momentum’ with h-constants.*

This process of formation of a full physical supœrganism then is the same of all other scale: a membrane is formed to enclosure a vital space, and then invaginate it with networks that find its ‘physical center’ or knot of communication in which they become a ‘particle’-singularity. The membrane of proteins forms, and finally the nucleus of DNA-RNA, which will travel through the vital space, tending for it. The electron is a nebulae that has trapped ‘dense’ cyclical light bosons as the black hole traps them in c-speed cyclical patterns in the event horizon and beyond. Those light bosons can be pictured as ‘light beams’ that have become fully coiled into a rotary motion by the gravity pull of the quark-mass. The particle state we perceive is the enclosure of the wave, in multiple variations on the same theme, from the shepherd dog – a moving particle encircling it, to the wall… Waves and particles as the go and stop symmetry are the essential element that carry the s=tœp duality of the Universe and keep emerging once and again in all scales, as far as gender duality, where the female is the reproductive vital energy ST-wave and the male is the Ts>St<Ts, collapsing, expanding, membrane or in-form-ative enclosure and singularity. So we have to Non-AE bits of existence: ST≈ST≈ST and Ts (membrane)>St(singularity)<Ts(membrane) we call ‘membrain’.

**ST>Ts:** **Waves and envelopes. **The singularity, which will rule both the membrane particle and wave comes latter in time, as the focus that increases the order of both, introducing an accelerating component to it, but it might NOT exist at all. As what exists first is the ST-present wave, which might be all; then the envelope appears and finally the logic singularity that will guide it into the future, so in terms of time the picture is: ST-Present wave < Ts-Past-membrane >SS- Future particle.

The simplest case is a ‘lineal’ String attached to a wall; the first one studied in the analysis of violin notes. In such case they are in synchronicity, as both particles/groups and wave-energy, travel at the same speed. And so those are also S≈T conserved systems.

**SS>TT: **Then it comes a ‘classic’ of 5D states, the ‘∆+1 mind-point’ surfing over an ∆-1 TT-field in which it prays, with NO body, no present state. This can be either way. The SS-particle-point state of the electron might be surfing the ∆-1 electric field in a social flow (electric current), perpendicularly, in the opposite direction (in 1D perpendicularity according to the 4^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean congruence is inverse direction) of the current as it does the photon in the opposite direction that the ‘neutrino-graviton’ (neutrino theory of light of Mr. Broglie the unrecognized 3^{rd} genius of XX c. physics along Planck and Einstein, massacred in all his theories by the egocy of the Bohr gang*).*

Again, following the procedure of those texts, to keep it mathematically simple, conceptually=organically complex we shall not enter into math details any scholar can ‘consult’ to verify our statements. Only to ‘solve’ in 5D the 2 reasons why the neutrino theory of light is discharged and why the graviton theory of neutrinos is ignored:

– 2 neutrinos must form a light wave between two particles must move in exact opposite directions, which is exactly what they do in 5D as they entangle two particles fixing them lineally, so once ‘distance’ is measured (the minimal, only information brought about by a neutrino at the Planck scale; as the neutrino scattering angle is exactly that of an h-planckton minimal scale), over the neutrino-graviton, particles exchange information about their ‘identities’ and ‘intensity’ with a light wave (so we can also know it through spectrographs).

– For neutrinos to be gravitons they should have in General relativity spin 2. But in the Universe information, which is what carries the spin is NOT conserved when we transcend scales. It is precisely what is lost. So neutrinos entering our ∆-3 scale changing plane of space-time as they ‘feed’ a light beam don’t need to have the same spin.

– The 3^{rd} objection is the ‘boring’ subject of Mr. Einstein’s egocy expanding his c-speed limit proper of the ∆-3 light scale to the entire infinite Universe. Neutrinos are the mirror antisymmetry of light at the ‘other side’ of the wall, so its speed is V≥C, as that of the photon is v≤C (depending on the medium they travel). So they meet at V=C when the ‘neutrino’ dies and it is swallowed by the light photon, and hence ‘stops’ as all dead corpses, which means it reaches its ‘minimal’ relative speed at v=c which is the stop state for the neutrino, as all speeds are relative.

Further on the 2 states of a particle, ‘stopping’=closing a cycle, as opposed to a wave constantly iterating a motion are in fact solutions to wave equations. So 5D considers the algebraic S=T equation of the wave, its full worldcycle and its 2 stop and go solutions, the proper ‘natural’ way to describe the breaking of its ‘symmetry’ to create the ST-St-Ts-SS processes of 5D physics. The obvious difference is that 5D ‘gives meaning’ to the nonsense jargon of 4D abstractions.

*It must be noticed that the ‘elimination’ of solutions that do not fit the expected Euclidean lineal view of physicists as we saw in the entropic big-bang is rife- as in all other sciences ‘ideology and learned’ routine comes always first. So the negative solutions are routinely dismissed in many systems, specially when they signify a different ‘time arrow’ to the local past of a worldcycle (given the lack of understanding of Non-Ælgebra and pentalogic). *The mathematical mirror then looses one of the main qualities of a ‘well-behaved’ language, synoptic and faster, as a language is just an ∆-¡ scale that according to 5D metrics, has more information (hence is inflationary) and it is also more synoptic, hence allows faster analysis of the deterministic paths of the future, than the ‘larger’ ST-being it describes.

*As we introduce in a second writing more maths, we shall see some surprising ad ons discharged, as those of an electromagnetic wave with its 2 solutions of implosive and explosive, past and future motions.* In general we shall find as a rule, in case we exit mundi before round up those papers, that a ± solution correspond to the inverse St-Ts or SS-TT Dimotions of time, as Form and motion are opposite in orientation, In a single dimension, or orthogonal in 2 dimensions, or with different topologies in 3D, etc.

**∆+1: **Finally to notice that in pentalogic there is also another way to explain the collapse of the wave into particle: ∆ª>∆+1. From the point of view of the particle, it is a social evolution, as *the train of the wave keeps collapsing socially into the stop position till finally forming the ‘boson’ state of the photon that allows it to remain as a dense point within the electron, its higher social form.*

**The different effetcts of special relativity. Charge invariance. **

Another theme not solved at all in 4D physics self-evident in 5D physics is why two entities which are both space-time time vortices of different scales, ∆-3: charges and ∆+4: masses, do not suffer the Lorentz transformations. The answer is obvious as a proof of the scalar nature of the Universe. It is called **Charge invariance,** which refers to the fixed electrostatic potential of a particle, regardless of speed. An electron has a specific rest charge. If we accelerate that electron, the charge remains the same (as opposed to a relativistic mass whose energy increases). So those particle characteristics that *belong to the ∆-3, 2 ¥-scale* are relativistically invariant (photons, charges, spins, and magnetic moments). Others, which belong to the ∆±4 scale are relativistic (mass, energy, and de Broglie wavelength).

Since the Lorentz factor that transforms *the picture of the ∆±4 gravitational, cosmologic world into the ∆-3 picture of our world, * γdoes not appear in the light, charge and spin for the obvious reason; that is the ∆-3 picture of our world. We ARE minds that perceive light with electronic spins. So no translation is needed. This origin of charge invariance is ignored so Wikipedia tell us that ‘There may be some hints proposed by string/M-theory. It is possible the concept of charge invariance may provide a key to unlocking the mystery of unification in physics (the theoretical unification of gravity, electromagnetism…’ which is also as so many ‘mysteries’ trivial in 5D, studied in 5D General relativity, next.

**RECAP.*** S**ó**T duality explains why C-speed is constant: because electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale you don’t add motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on *the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

Does this mean that the Lorentz invariance, transformation, etc. which we use to measure those far away scales in terms of our human sense of continuous motion does not make sense? NOT, of course, it is the proper way to build measures from the human p.o.v. It is though only one ‘perspective’ – that of the ‘humind’. But if we were an atom the more realist view is that of the experimentally proved stop and go ‘attitude’ of particles and waves. So 5D explains the biggest conundrum of quantum physics, the duality wave-particle and WHY when we observe a wave it ALWAYS appears as a collapsing particle: because we stop it to get information of it.

Bohr’s Copenhagen interpretation is literalist, ego-centered, anthropomorphic as he ‘the observer’ doesn’t create the collapse phenomena. It merely see stops the wave into particle. So Einstein, the realist quipped ‘the moon doesn’t disappear when we don’t look at it’. And he is right. A particle can stop without a brute watching it.

In the quantum scale, they are related to the duality energetic wave, informative particle, which displace over a quantum field of non-local entropic motions (pilot wave theory), *and achieve synchronicity in its three sub-clocks as particle, wave and field harmonise them in stable orbits (graph, mathematical description).*

**Pilot-wave theory** introduces those three dimotions of all systems of Nature, for quantum physical systems its field of entropy, its present, iterative wave of reproduction and its informative state as particles that ‘ride over waves’, following the ‘quantum field of faster motions-entropies’ as a predator follows its food or a bird glides an air-stream.

If in the thermodynamic scale those ages of matter are crystal clear, as we expand the Russian dolls into larger bigger and smaller parts outside and inside, we move to a generic relationship that explains the enlarger regions of ‘pure entropic states of matter’ beyond plasma, and pure solid states beyond crystal matter – it is the generator equation for the larger ‘Dark world’ ∆±4 universe.

** **

** **

**Cat alleys. The perceptions of the mind. **

The previous understanding of the ‘lack of interaction’ of a certain scale with a ‘field of forces’, or a state of motion is ultimately derived of the *stop and go discontinuous structure of reality which affects also to the ‘dark spacetimes’ that are not perceived by a system. In many parts we considered the dark spaces of a singularity within a membrane with a 3-π/π=4% only aperture to the Universe. A *system ultimately – a mind – only perceives its languages, and only perceives those other fractal points with whom it is connected. *All minds reduce the Universe to a world. *

This is counter-intuitive to the fact those minds see their reduced scale and world as a continuous ‘shrunk reality’, a compact form without vacuum in the ∆º scale of the mind. In the ∆+¡ scale however as ‘lineal space is larger’ and ‘cyclical informative time slower’, there is less information to see – yet the total value of that scale is the same ($ x ð = C); so the ∆º observer sees less information, a slower reality and emptier Universe.

*All is mental spacetime; where we miss and select the world with whom we interact; or in case of entropic forces they select us ‘to feed on our existential energy’. But a choice is made. *The choice of the electronic world does NOT include the ∆-4 gravitational scale, which interacts with mass. This today is explained wrongly with the Higgs mechanism and its gravitational field (as the Higgs belongs to the evolutionary forces that increase the mass of quark particles). The gravitational field however is likely mediated by the Neutrino, as conservation of spins=information doesn’t hold in 5D and light feeds on it. Which leads us to the *duality of feeding and perception. *All is ultimately a game of ‘feeding->perception of the particle/wave/field entity choosing either to perceive the particle, to feed on the energy of the wave or to move entropically with the field. But a system cannot ‘process’ the trinity parts of the ∆±¡ T.œ it absorbs.* It does make a choice and so the abstract equations of physics must be *interpreted for each given entity as both a ‘topological choice’ of perception of information, feeding on entropy to move or absorption of energy, or interacting for reproduction from the ∆-4, ∆-3, ∆-2 scales.

Those are themes that correspond to the paper on physics and scale, so we shall not dwell on them (hopefully when this 3 years project, 2^{nd} year starting, is finished, the whole 30 papers will have more structure, more meat and less repetitions). So, us electronic, visual, ¥(∆-3)>e(∆-2) minds do NOT interact with our perceptive system with the gravitational world – it is not our cat alley. Why? Obviously because for e in ∆-2, gravitation is just two scales below, and hence ∆-2 is to ∆º ‘food’ (neutrino theory of light).

The entire architectonic mapping of the relationships between scales and different forces according to dimotions, is complex. I painted it long ago in a mural of conceptual cubism, gone with all my earlier work and simply speaking, I am too lazy to reconstruct it for these papers. Others might do it in the future if 5D ever enters academia… I doubt.

Concepts so entrenched in the materialist view of scientist such as ‘forces’ and ‘strength’ are meaningless for those who do not choose to perceive it. If we move upwards in scale the same truth holds for human sensorial systems which have a range, and surprisingly for many are not affected by too strong sounds, extreme electric discharges and so on, as they are not sensible to them.

This is the case of the electron and the ¥-ray in gravitational fields of the ˙∆-4 scale.

What is then the strongest ‘vital force’? Different for each scale. Obviously that in what we ‘feed’; and then that what reproduces us. Forces though have different ‘form’ according to the different dualities of its asymmetric nature for each element. Topologies, Scales and Functions, S, ∆ & T become all entangled and determined by each other, according to the @-mind scale in which the T.œ exists.

Further on perception is discontinuous as in the movie example – but the lapse of time in which the system crosses a dark space without informative input is not recorded as ‘passing of time’, it *does not exist. So a system that chooses to perceive stop positions do NOT record the ‘motion lapse’ between frames. And so an important question to solve is when are counted ‘the tics of the clocks that measure the ‘mean beat of existence’ – usually around the 9-11 ^{9-11} number? We will elaborate in future revisions on that. *

**FROM 4D WORLDLINES TO WORLDCYCLES.**

We shall compare the 2 models of lineal absolute vs. cyclical, multiple spacetime.

– The Newtonian model of absolute spacetime, still standing regardless of small corrections through Einstein…

-The relational model from Leibniz to L§, of ∞ space-time clocks with 1 more dimension – the scalar 5D SxT dimension of spacetime, origin of time worldcycles and past, present & future ages.

Once this hurdle of complexity is passed, other things will be easier to understand, beyond the numerical description provided by its equations, as to why exist and what are waves, time, space, particles, existence, dimension, motion and information… which are obscure in 5D. Since even Einstein when asked but ‘what time is’, kept silent and then for lack of a better answer replied: ‘what a clock measures’… but all clocks are cyclical, thus to make its ‘worldcycles’ they need at least another dimension, besides as cycles require two lines.

**The second dimension of time… and some more.**

As we are all made of ¬∆@st, ternary ∆±1 scales, the three dimotion of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those dimotions in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time dimotions, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

In the graph, physicists 4D single time dimotion allow only to draw worldlines of locomotion. The attempts to create a metaphysics of existence departing only from a single Dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) is the biggest error of modern physics, as the worldcycle of life and death is much more enticing than running around all your life in locomotion. But to fully understand it, we need to widen the ‘modes’ of time=change=motion of the Universe, studied by science, adding its 5th dimension of social, scalar growth and decay.

* *In the graphs, we see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropic-death-weapon state, which as the graph shows is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆-1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.

In that regard perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit.

Thus the view of time in 4D & a single space-time continuum is a reduction of the larger picture of 5D³, which expands our view to include new scales and information carried by cyclical clocks in its frequency and form, dealing with the distortions caused by the interaction of the gravitational larger scale of lesser, flat information, the human electromagnetic light space-time view of hyperbolic waves in 3 perpendicular dimension and the lower, more informative scale of quantum physics.

**ERRORS ARISING FROM THE WRONG CONCEPTS OF DIMENSIONS OF SPACE AND TIME. **

**Dimensions of motion and form: the growth of scales in physical systems. The error of the spatial 5 ^{th} dimension.**

Multiple space dimensions, like the 5^{th} dimension the artist tries to render in the hypercube do NOT exist in reality. Those objects are mathematical, linguistic fictions caused by the fact that any language of information is inflationary, as literary fictions are. So we can invent SEMANTIC fictions in all of them, but WILL not materialize in reality, regardless of humind’s creationism.

The beauty of some mathematical theories, as the beauty of literature obscures those self-evident facts. Yet because huminds completely ignore the meaning of Dimensions and Motions (dimensional motions) and its fundamental law: S=T, which is required for any ‘species to exist’ – there are NOT species without Head that survive for long, meaning, a body-wave and particle-head (ST>T) must exist, balanced over a Ts-field/limb system to absorb entropic energy and so on… A 5^{th} Dimension of space is an aberration. But don’t we have 3 Dimensions of space and only one of time? Not So. Because the height Dimension is in fact a dimotion of time, very slowly growing through ‘evolution’ (Deep time tendency of all species) or growth. The understanding of Dimensions in terms of ‘the different speeds and scales of time’ is NOT the subject of physics but of non-Euclidean geometry treated in our paper (5D Math and space: Non-E Geometry) and as most disciplines of humind knowledge requires a thorough upgrade in its principles.

**In a single Space-time scale. Light space-time dimensional motions**

So the proper way to reorder those 4 dimensional motions to keep the S≈T symmetry between both varies according to the number of Dimotions of ‘existence’ considered by each species; and *the rule of inverse orthogonality:*

A 2-dimensional diagram of mental space has ‘inverse, orthogonal parameters’, which opposes perpendicularly the two main dimeotions of ‘spatial information’ (height) and ‘lineal temporal motion’ (length).

This *is the simplest vital species of the human Universe, ‘light’ spacetime, from where the building of Dimensional motions starts. And as such the background spacetime for all more complex dimotional systems. *So:

– The ‘minimal’ species of reality is a ‘cycle’, which has two dimotions. And so we call the Lineal Dimotion of a cycle (Diameter) its ‘Time dimotion’ and the height dimotion its Dimotion of spatial information. As a cycle moves as a cycloid across a wave.

– Because Y-‘information’ rises from the lineal X-entropic energy ‘emerging’ in the dimotion of height; it often has ‘lesser’ size’ (remember NOT all the motion of an ∆-1 scale transcends to ∆º, the true meaning of entropy, or else the Universe would not be ‘sustainable’, in the same manner the basement of a building has more ‘mass’ to sustain the higher floors… Here a pyramidal rule applies, and in terms of graphs, it means the ‘height Dimotion’ ‘subtracts’ energy to the length dimotion, by a ‘square rule’ (variations on the same theme require detailed analysis of the general law’. Thus a Complex Plane is very useful because the √-x value of its height.

– A ternary ‘frame of reference’ then must have 3 Coordinates, X-length (locomotion, Ts), a height coordinates (St) *and the cross product of both, or ‘dimensional motion of reproduction’.*

A 2 x 2 Frame of reference, will divide according to each specific Dimotion in several ways.

The one that matters to us here is the way special relativity divides it:

A physical system, as a ‘flat’ Height x width bidimensional form, *reproducing through its motion along the length-time coordinates, which ‘curve’ and shrink by an √negative=imaginary number. *

* *

Because height is the dimension of information and length of motion, both are asymptotic to each other, which explains the method by which light is stopped in the mind and how the stop and go procedure goes, as every reproductive cycle of a minimal ST (length-height being) can be accumulated in the 3^{rd} ‘relative widith’ dimension.

It follows that as frequency of higher amplitude have higher height, the perception of a light is ‘below’, on the formal ‘crest’ of its frames of lineal reference. Formal perception by SS-minds of asymptotic TT-entropy or ‘function of information is key to mathematical topology of changes from TT to SS through an energy region of combination of both of the form ST, giving us the classic ‘realistic function of existence, in ST in any science of reality.

In the graph, one of the many topological uses of the orthogonallity of the function of exist¡ence in its 5 Dimotions as they move through space-time (special Relativity theory).

**The duality of space vs. time perception. Number and transformation of dimensions.**

We thus relate the ternary physical dimensions of time (TT-entropic, decelerating motions, ST-eady motions and St-accelerated motions) to its ternary dimensions in space (TT-distance, line; St-area, vortex; ST constant volume).

In space, ST-energy dimensions are waves of ¬E fractal points. But as a point is a 0-1 unit circle of dimension 1, 2D areas become 3 D volumes, but in time *the 3 dimotions depart from 1D steady state motion and can be considered as opposite directions, when volumes of space grow, through the scattering dimotion of entropy diminishing its speed, vs. the acceleration of speed that diminishes space as the system collapses into a singularity:*

So the 3D of classic space, ‘volume’ actually belongs to the entropic dimotion of decelerating time that creates space-volume, v. the opposite dimotion of imploding time vortices that diminish space volume and increases speed, VxR=k

So what seems in space *a natural growth of volume in space, in time has a different order: *

*Entropic ≈decelerating volume < steady state ≈ distance-motion > Informative, cyclical area ≈ accelerated motion.*

This different ‘order’ of dimensions when perceived in simultaneous space and cyclical time is the main dislocation in the way the mind perceives both (which is sorely painful when we consider the order of a world cycle, always starting in the ∆-1 scale of maximal information to decline as it grows and reproduces into less perfect, more entropic volumes of iterative forms that finally decline and die in the dimotion of entropy; which the mind that has a spatial-volume inclineD nature of ever-growth, does not understand).

**The errors of treating lineal time as a dimension of space moving to infinity.**

The fact that mathematics as a ‘mirror language’ can use the concept of a fixed spatial 4^{th} dimension to make calculus on time, to solve mathematical questions, is due to the S=T paradox of Galileo. It doesn’t mean however that time is a fixed form of space; and because there is much philosophical confusion on the meaning of both, a series of paradoxes arise, such as absurd concepts as the idea it is possible to travel back in time.

So as physicists use time only to measure locomotion=change in space, *they call time, the fourth dimension of space (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²). And* this obsession for spatial measures and dimensions made them ‘guess’ that if there is a fifth dimension, it should also be a dimension of space.

This poises a problem. As we cannot have experience of a dimension of space *of the same lineal, infinite form than our 3 perpendicular dimensions. So physicists just put this dimension elsewhere, *merrily making all kind of imaginary models of multiple dimensionality, which leads to the true limit of human science:

Today physicists call a ‘dimension’ any parameter they use to model reality, call time a dimension of space, just because it is in the same equation (though as Einstein put it ‘wires don’t travel to the past’ and the t of its equations always has an inverse value to the s of space (s/t or +s – t)…

So physicists’ work is quite useful as most ‘short- motions’ in space-time do happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. *Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study. But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or x²+y²+z²=c²t² in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.*

Still they are right and in fact easily converted to the equations of 5D metric. For example, the equation of Einstein tells us that the bidimensional coordinates of space (x²+y²+z²=S²) are equal to the bidimensional coordinates of time, (ct)². So it is a variation on the same theme than S=T, the holographic principle. And it is ok if physicists decide to reduce their knowledge of time=motions to it, under the straight-jacket of only mathematical equations that are right and precise.

**Asymptotic perception of motions in the X-direction**

The distorsion or ‘shortening’ of the particle-form in the X-coordinate then is just a higher dimensional variation of the same theme; which runs from doppler shift effect to special relativiity –ct factor to Lorentz transformations.

**RECAP.** The connection between Dimotions in time and Dimensions of Space is the essential symmetry, S=T, that justifies the forms of the Universe. Height=information, Length=entropic motion and the cross product between them, with all its multiple variations, from the structure of 3 Perpendicular light dimotions to forces, to Minkowski’s spaces, to the place of your head, to the mathematical function of exponential entropy, to laws of complex space derive all from them.

**The fifth dimension of scales…**

No longer can be drawn in a single 2D Universe; though there is a mathematical form to convey its meaning.

Polytopes must be understood as ternary systems which reproduce in motion forming a larger 5D scale; so 4D is a motion, and that is indeed how geometers construct them, bringing to each 3D point an internal volume; that is, making each vortex of a 3D polygon a new ‘square’ to form the tesseract which is equivalent to ‘enlarge’ its inner form. While another 4D polytope will be merely the motion of the square that becomes a larger ‘1D’ line in a larger world, as we make a 2d plane by moving across a 1D line.

What about the sphere? It is the ultimate regular polytope and so we wonder how a 4D sphere looks like. The answer is also telling of the 5D S=T structure of the Universe, where time motions and spatial dimensions are equivalent – but only motions truly exist. So we have to consider beyond 3D, new spatial dimensions to be beyond algebraic manipulation time motions. This is also our experimental evidence, when we generalize what we see of a 3D sphere as it moves through a 3D plane: a series of growing and diminishing cuts, passing through a 2D world.

And so a 4D sphere moving, passing through a 3D world appears as a growing and diminishing sphere, *indistinguishable from a *5D Universe. *Thus we postulate an Einsteinian “Principle of Equivalence’* as a proof of the existence of a 5^{th} dimension of parts growing into wholes:

‘A 4D spatial system moving with a 5^{th} dimension of time, IS (equivalent to) a 3D spatial system with two scalar dimensions of growth and diminution in inverse ∆±1 scales.”

So beyond our perceivable entangled 3D holographic parts, all further dimensions are scalar motions of time (4D, 5D inverse, SS-formal, implosive or TT-entropic expansive dimotions). So we differentiate dimensional growth:

**S=T.** In a single plane, beyond 3D spatial still forms, new dimensions are temporal, moving ones, which only through the ‘persistence’ of a memory create new dimensions of space, (as explained on our analysis of fractal dimensions). Motion then become reproduction of information, and ‘social forms of growth’ – a cube moving to in-form a squared line, sphere turning into a dual spiral diminishing and growing to form a larger flat disk, etc.)

**∆±¡.** In scalar planes, when the form is ‘static’ in the same position. Then the being experiences a ‘scalar travel through the fifth dimension’ growing its inner parts from points into ‘cells’. This in ideal polytopes means to draw in each vertex a new tetrahedron, cube or dodecahedron). Or as a whole growing or diminishing in size-scale.

So that is the dynamic reality of 4D spheres passing through our world, which do NOT exist as such, but as S=T for any mental spatial mirror that trans-forms T-motions into S-till dimensions, 4D polytopes are useful to model and solve mathematical problems of real physics, by the algebraic method of converting a time motion into a geometric still spatial dimension, so 4D polytopes can represent real 3D T.œs with one locomotion or two locomotions, the second one an TT-scattering entropic dimotion of scale.

But that is the simplest ‘topology’ of the fifth dimension. Normally that ‘growth’ happens through fractal networks. Since the fifth dimension is a dimension of time evolution and social growth, which co-exists within the broken spaces left by networks, as all dimensions are fractal networks, with a limited fractal dimension defined by the quantity of space occupied by the networks. This in non Euclidean algebra is explained by the fact that irrational numbers do NOT exist (the are ratios which never have a fixed value but turn around a rational number above and below, hence called ‘Dedekind cuts’), and yet their number of dark spaces or cuts in a network is so huge that the holes of irrational numbers amount to infinity compared to the number of rationals (one of the classic Cantor’s paradoxes of infinity).

Function then matters more than form, *and geometric forms exist when they are useful to the functions of the 5 dimotions, reason why brutish expressions of 5D as that of the 1 ^{st} graph in space are nowhere to be seen. *

3 spatial dimensions in single plane are good enough. For more Dimensions we enter as in the simplest graph of a growing sphere, in a process of social growth which also happens for a cube:

We need then to consider a new set of 3 temporal motions that will convert each ‘cube’ or sphere of the 3^{rd} dimension into a fractal, finitesimal point that will move in a larger Universe creating new dimensions again in number of 3, which then will become fixed spaces due to the duality of motion and form, time and space, and grow into new ternary social networks, which will again move on the relative vacuum of a larger world to form a new dimensional triad. In this manner the 5^{th} dimension grows, plane after plane of ternary space-time symmetries.

The Universe is made of 2-manifolds of time-motion and space-form, which combine into holographic universes, and further more complex combinations, to a maximal of 3-manifolds of time and space such as:

*S=T: 5 Motions of time =5 Dimensions of scalar space*

And then after those dimensions are filled up the system ‘emerges’ into a larger scale of the 5^{th} ‘transversal’ dimension of social evolution, as part of a bigger whole.

*Because function is what matters, then we can consider even more complex n-dimensional systems, (Hilbert spaces, etc.) but those are NOT really n-dimensional but systems in which we ‘add’ different parts of a being (rays), according to the rules of Absolute relativity (S=T, S-T=0), to form complex ensembles of herds, waves and ‘trinity parts’ of a whole, or balanced ‘games’ as those of Hamiltonians (Potential + Kinetic Energy= Total energy) or SHM motions.*

The underlying idea is that manifolds are like curves and surfaces, except, perhaps, that they might be of higher dimension. Every manifold comes with a specific nonnegative integer called its *dimension*, which is, roughly speaking, the number of independent numbers (or “parameters”) needed to specify a point. The prototype of an n-dimensional manifold is n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn, in which each point literally *is *an n-tuple of real numbers.

An n-dimensional manifold is an object modeled *locally *on Rn; this means that it takes exactly n numbers to specify a point, at least if we do not stray too far from a given starting point. A physicist would say that an n-dimensional manifold is an object with n *degrees of freedom*.

So physicists *as always with huminds, by knowing simply the rules of the language-mirror that has embedded the larger laws of Space-time magically get results: ‘follow the language, follow the mirror, follow the money’ even if you have no idea what language, mirror and money means. Still due to that handicap of true ‘why thought’, ignoring the ‘balanced, S=T* restrictions on the meaning of dimensional motions, and the easier perception of ‘pure spatial forms’, they always confuse time dimotions with dimensions of space.

**RECAP.** By lack of understanding of cyclical time and the S=T relativity paradox, physicists try to construct a *fifth dimension of space, an impossible construct of physicists, which study ONLY one dimension of time=motion =*change: **locomotion or **change in the position and speed in space: v=s/t (and similar equations by Einstein, who added a correcting **ct** factor to Galileo’s relativity and to measure those space distances and speeds).

**Mental space according to 5D rules: electronic minds.**

When we move into the next ‘social scale’ of physical systems, the electron, as a herd of ultrandese, trapped photons within the potential well of the gravitational black hole of the quantum scale (quark nuclei), we then have to rewrite those concepts in higher topological dimensions. And so the smallest possible system we find is an S-orbital, a spherical form and its orthogonal ST opposition is the spin up and down with different quantities of energy, where the St-informative gender has less than the Ts-spin. Then the 5^{th} dimension is established by the S1+S2 double orbit, one larger than the other, which can be seen in space as two different electron nebulae, in time as the 5rth dimension of the same one.

Then when we go to the ‘real mind space’ of mankind, we must add the other lineal orbitals, of our ‘atomic mind’ (nitrogen), whereas the S1, S2, orbitals play the role of informative St-elements and the 3 D-orbitals of the lineal Ts-element. The mind of man is constructed with those qbit units.

** **

**WORLDCYCLES VS. WORLDLINES**

Physical studies of worldlines and locomotions are simple truths of a single Time space dimotion – only a part of the pentalogic truth we achieve with the 5 Dimotions of a worldcycle.

Time for physicists has only 2 dimensions of maximal, lineal motion, TT-entropy and Ts- locomotion. So they do not understand worldcycles, which they simplify into worldlines.

Thus when you ‘ask’ what is life to a physicist he will not talk of the world cycles of the ‘times of exist¡ence’ and all its dimotions between generation and extinction, but of your lineal locomotions, as if that was all what time is for you: to move with your lowly legs. And then he will trace a worldline of your motions and say that is your ‘time worldline’, and enthusiastically babble platitudes about the fact you can displace left or right according to speed on that cone of light space-time, etc (graph). All nonsense, which is worth to know for particles going at c-speed but resolves nothing about the meaning of your time existence:

The blue graph of a man ‘running its worldline of existence, as if it were just all about physical locomotions, we see the huge difference between the ‘simplified locomotion view’ of worldlines, and the Worldcycle graph of the complete sum of the 8 motions of the Universe (±motions in the dimensions of space, of time, of fractal scales, and the ±process of informative perception and communication by the mind, which we resume in the 4 elements of reality: ∆ºst).* *

Nothing regarding informative processes can be understood with that graph. Though we can indeed understand very simple non-evolving particles and its spatial motions with it, as physicists do. But not even then we can study *changes of STages of physical systems, since the calculus of locomotions uses ‘instants of present=finitesimal derivatives’ that don’t apply to ‘change of internal parameters’, to inner motions necessary to change STages of life, where the system switches from external to internal motion; as it stop and goes through its existence. So for example, the change from youth to maturity, Ts>ST means a change of ‘s’ to S, from internal no-motion to internal change in information that brings up the reproduction of the system. *

This is a key point of the whole structure of change in the Universe, which happens with the interplay of internal and external motion and form. I.e. when we act, we first ‘stay put’ as form, but our mind is ‘thinking’, having internal motion, and so we think what we shall act, and then we act, and our mind is ‘stopping’ it has no internal motion. So the fundamental event of motion v. thought is St (internal motion, external form) < = > Ts (internal form, external motion). In those systems a *continuous calculus approach fails totally to understand the quantum stop < go process.*

The error of scientists is to ‘believe’ the fairy dogmatic tales and expansions of those lineal concepts of time as v=s/t parameters of spatial motion, as if that were all what time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the St-SS-ST most important informative dimotions, the key to understand wholes & worldcycles.

Instead when physicists apply the 4 dimensions they use, 3 of lineal space and one of lineal time, to any being they describe their existence, as a worldline of meaningless motions: The graph shows how our lives look in the simplistic, ill-defined conceptually 4D model of present space-time. A being merely ‘moves in time’ through ‘locomotions’.

All other forms of inner and outer change that affect the being are ignored; and so we talk of a ‘present’ concept of time, or ‘external concept’ of time-change as mere locomotion, translation on space, *which clearly does not account for other type of changes that have no external motion, internal changes in the in-form-ation, in the form of beings, a much slower process in time that however* happens to all entities; and it is definitely more complex that a mere locomotion. As it implies at least two modes of change: growth and diminution that happens with aging, from ‘smaller scales in space’ to larger sizes and vice versa; and change in form, in ‘topology’ as in morphogenesis and wrinkling, again two changes in the form of beings.

Obviously Einstein’s work is of merit as it truly exhausted our understanding of locomotions, and we will explain it further on the more technical mathematical articles on physics in the fourth line, dealing with the c-speed constant, the Lorentz transformations, and the proper way to understand its boosts and rotations (mathematical modeling of time clocks in 4D). And further on we shall analyze the relativistic equations of quantum mechanics. But what we want to stress at this point is that locomotion and entropy, the dimotions of time related to translation in space as opposed to those related to change in information, social evolution and form, are NOT enough to deal with the nature of time, and the existence of worldcycles in all beings, but merely a reductionist case, of the larger 5D model, even if it has achieved an astounding perfection in its detail – You will still learn nothing about your biological worldcycles from the knowledge of Dirac’s equation and the 10 EFE equations of relativity.

**TRAVELS IN TIME, THE TRINITY OF MODELS: RELATIVITY, QUANTUM AND 5D.**

The trinity of models of modern time in physics is obvious; and as time brings evolution of information, regarding errors the oldest models have more:

1900s: Special relativity; 1920: quantum theory 1990s: 5D physics. The first one is plagued of errors due to the lineal concept of time in its interpretations, NOT in its orthogonal analysis of light space-time as we have discussed it. The second in quantum physics goes back to the basics, accepting past to future equal arrows, but its errors come from its mathematical creationism and incapacity to understand the difference between spatial state and time cycles, confusing often due to the faster time-speed of smaller particles, a time event (as in quark confinement) with a spatial form, and the third model has main a problem: nobody knows it 🙂

**Time in physical sciences. Lineal External motions≈changes.**

Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is not a single time for the whole Universe. Hence there are no time paradoxes, as you can only travel to the past in local terms, in your clocks in the entropic moment of death: St<<TT and you do so when you die. So does a particle on a Feynman’s diagrams as an antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories and scifi plots (Hawking’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes, etc.) is time travel, based in the concept that man’s mechanical time-clock is the only time clock of the universe.

As the great dissident Russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch?’….

We are a fractal, local domain, a knot of time space cycles of physical or biological Nature for whom the 2 past>Future, and Future>Past arrows can be considered only within our organic circadian cycles.

When we die, we travel locally to our relative past as we dissolve back to our ∆-1 parts erasing the ∆º networks, loosing information. Our local big-bang death thus travels back in time but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards & backwards on its ∞ present iterative Tœs in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time – a single time clock, uncoiled to infinity in an abstract continuous Cartesian plane of for the entire Universe (see drawings Cartesian graphs & mind-worlds).

Pentalogic dimotions of cyclical time and fractal scalar space is more complex than Physicists’ lineal single time; ‘widening’ our understanding beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding a -(ct)² factor of warping correction). And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’ are the Supœrganisms of the 5th dimension.

Yet, as locomotion, Ts, and entropy, TT, are just part of that more complex 5Dimotional view, according to the correspondence principle, all equations of physics are derived from the more complex formalism of 5D.

**Orthogonal Feynman diagrams, past, present and future.**

The view of time on quantum physics, regardless of its own defects due to the Copenhagen interpretations has overcome the problem of lineal, single global time and rightly defines locally two arrows of relative past and future even if it misses its understanding with the analysis of antiparticles and the (anti)symmetry of both directions.

In the graph Feynman shows a case of a relative past antiparticle of entropy and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of spacetime existential energy (¥ ray).

In the 2^{nd} picture this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the 2 inverse dimotions of (anti)particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles. Since life-future-dimotions are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events). So Feynman diagrams below shows a 5D space-time generator for the ∆-1 scale:

Past-entropic antiparticle state < present-wave iterative state > future -informative particle state

Which for the gravitational ∆+1 scale will write:

E-ntropic explosion < cc-wave of energy > St-mass vortex of future (E=Mc2)

Whereas physicists confuse an entropic big-bang explosion that erases the form of the mass with the truly energetic wave that has both form and motion.

**RECAP.** Beyond lineal, Galilean Time in the XX century, physicists widened their comprehension of time, in two separate new models – that of Einstein’s relativity, and that of quantum physics in the realm of particles:

*The 2 most important new perceptions of time in modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams*

Special relativity is only concerned with, lineal motions and *the shortest timespace of a worldcycle – *present derivatives. I*ts aim is not to understand time but adapt measures of maximal lineal motion in ‘light space-time’, (tautologically c-speeds as we cannot go faster than the simplest, faster (SxT=C) scale of which you are made) the basis of our electronic mind and stop and go distortions to the human scale.* Quantum physicists have dealt more often with the concept of time parity realizing that locally motions to the past and to the future are (anti)symmetric. So they deal with the inverted symmetry between the entropic dimotion, as in an antiparticle and the life-organic dimotion, as in the particle and the iterative dimotion as in the wave.

**Pentalogic of antiparticles. A sample case of the pentalogic method we shall use for physical systems.**

As an example on the deeper understanding that the many sides of the Galilean Paradox bring to physics we consider a pentalogic analysis of Antiparticles, which as texts grow in complexity will be canonical for all physical systems:

*Space=form:* Antiparticles indeed live isolated in an absolute stop position, in magnetic traps at CERN, as ‘Schrodinger’s cats’, *as a corpse that cannot move, as if a particle tries to be revived by motion* will collide with a living particle and die.

*∆+1: Scalar function:* Antiparticles have also an ∆+1 function, as the ‘galaxy’, the scale of the Universe similar to an atom looks in fact as an anti-atom with 90% of its mass on the halo. So we live in an ‘antigalatom’ and *the true balance between particles and antiparticles happens in the ‘antisymmetry between ∆º<∆+1 scale’. *

*Entropic view: *antiparticles are NOT real particles but states of death, which therefore are ‘STOP moments’ as all ‘dead corpses’ are ‘stopped’.

*Temporal view:* Antiparticles move to the past as all deaths are a past regression

*@-*mental view: This is represented mathematically, in a Feynman Diagram with Time and Space in orthogonal opposite coordinates as a line motion back in time.

Again, huminds which anthropic, self-centered might not be interested on the ‘pentalogic’ different ‘truths’ of the ‘Rashomon effect’ of absolute relativity, but reality is the sum of all monad’s points of view, and all have a part of the total truth of an event. How we shall go through the 4 papers on physics and entropy, space-time, mind and scale with pentalogic is simple. Because we want to highlight the organic nature of physical systems, we will keep the @-mental view for the end; that is the mathematics of it. We want to prove that a non-mathematical description of quality whys in physics not only is possible but necessary; and the ‘mirror’, the mathematics of it, just the last causal image – or the first one when we reverse the order and extract the properties for it.

Again in ‘Physics and mind’ and ‘the Universe and mind’ we deal with the constant feed-back equation between ‘minds that mirror with languages the Universe’ and mirrors of SS-order that are projected on the Universe. Here from a book of penpal Penrose, which I corrected properly*: In the left the strongest arrow of order in the ∆+1 TT-Universe**ó**∆-1 SS-mathematical mind mirror tug of war that structures reality, the TT-universe comes first and determines as the larger whole with its 5D laws reality, but then the mirror-language that imitates reality is projected in the smaller territory of order of the being, a copycat of that image; expanding the information of the Universe into a smaller ∆-1 scale in which it exists. In this manner the Universe adds ∆±¡ scales of depth slightly different as the mirror is a simplified version of the whole. Then once the language has imprinted TT-motions with the image (right graph), they will be selected according to its ‘veracity’ to those laws. So creation is always a ‘back and forth’ feed-back between ∆±¡ scales, symmetric to the relative future to past to future motions of a worldcycle of existence as in the particle antiparticle game.*

So to build up a true understanding of ANY phenomena, we need to analyze it in ∆-scale (ST), space (St), time (Ts), mind (SS) and entropy (TT). We will do so with ‘everything in physics’, as that is the way an advanced civilization would teach ANY subject; and then once the ‘quality’ elements are laid down we can use mathematics. And again, we can apply to mathematics the pentalogic mirror as we did when laying down the 5 ‘pentalogic’ views on gravitation (Newton->Poisson>Einstein; Lagrange->Hamilton) , as mathematics as all languages become inflationary – there are always more kaleidoscopic images than larger realities. So mathematics also mirrors the different ST-St-Ts-SS-TT perspectives; reason why to make sense of mathematical physics it is ALSO needed to apply pentalogic (or trilogic), as a ‘fractal principle’. As each part-point is a world in itself.

Finally in the analysis of the ‘varieties’ of species that are possible, a more sophisticated understanding of what the Universe allows and what does NOT (Laws of existential algebra) is needed. Here though the Universe is amazingly simple. We need only the ‘page’ of the stientific method, and the basic understanding of those symbols, because any mind can only operate in ∆±4 planes, of which the ∆±4 is the source of entropic motion with no information (gravitation for man), the ∆±3 scale of pixels of informative gauging perception (light for man), ∆±2 of ‘feeding bits’ (amino-acid molecules for man) ∆±1 seeds of reproduction and ∆º couples and identical particles for ∆+1 social evolution. It is an amazingly ordered game, and so only 2 ‘quantum jumps’ are allowed, meaning, systems might jump an intermediate scale, but NOT more as in death, ∆+1<<∆-1.

As usual we must remark that for 30 years, the few times I had tried to explain this to larger audience, the enormous jump of consciousness and perception of the beauty of the architectonical Universe overwhelms the reader, and his egocy (the feeling he knows nothing) makes him reject it as ‘out of my mind’. I wish he were right and I had instead of a better focused mirror, the imagination required to truly invent this 5D worldview, because then I would not be just a humind, soon to die, already with the mirror fast erasing its memory of what it has seen, but God itself. I might have a 3^{rd} trilogic eye-sense to have perceived all this but trust me, none came of my imagination. I recommend the reader who wishes to expand its verbal understanding of reality, man and the difference between thinkers and scholars that just repeat what others have thought, INSTEAD OF mirroring reality in a slightly different creative brain, to consult the best philosopher of modern History after Leibniz, Mr. Schopenhauer on his delightful pieces on ‘creation and thought’ in ‘literature and art’… Since he the titan of ilogic thought of the XIX c. and yet because he used the language of man, is ignored (or rather nobody in this digital age seems to understand a dot of it; though the two colossus of Physics, Einstein and Planck revered him as I do). Instead the eraseheads of the visual and digital age, went for Frege, Boole, Hillbert, the Wien school, Russell and all those simpletons who just tried to copy and translate with zero results the profound logic of verbal tenses, past, present and future into the limited ‘paradoxical capacity’ of mathematics to explain the *complex entanglements of the paradoxical ‘Rashomon effect’ of pentalogic thought. *

Pentalogic IS NOT a fancy ad on, less real than Non-Euclidean geometry of fractal points. It is very real, because creation (see papers on Universe and mind, as the last paper we shall write, physics and mind with the highest level of 5D physics, that is, including the translation of mathematical equations is not yet done). What ultimately pentalogic means is that a single description as usual today in all stiences is not real. *This is very hard for the monologic anthropic self-centered man to understand. The more so to a physicist, who truly cannot put two words together since Einstein took 3 years to speak his first words ‘soup cold’ (which were his last, as he ate soup and died).*

Thus 5D in a pentalogic analysis will enlightens both – the @-mathematical & the experimental view of ‘physics’ even in this introductory, not exhaustive course. As in all other stiences it is up to academia to either take on this better philosophy of science of reality and complete the job or ignore it. You cannot ask for a man with so little time left to do the whole job required by an entire encyclopedia of physics. Or judge the value of 5D on those terms.

**GENERAL RELATIVITY**

**THE LANGUAGE PERSPECTIVE.**

A problem of all sciences is the incapacity to ‘study’ the a priori limits of a language-mind, mirror of the Universe, which acts as a kaleidoscope with multiple views. That is, why an entire paper is dedicated to the analysis of languages mirrors. In physics this problem is exacerbated by the philosophy of ‘linguistic creationism’ that makes physicists believe mathematics, NOT space and time, are the original substance of reality.

Languages as infinity mirrors though are inflationary. So there are multiple similar views, and when they reach higher detail, they loose clarity. Languages are also synoptic and so they can as smaller systems in 5D (SxT=C), forecast the future, as we can calculate in a deterministic Universe that future in a faster synoptic way. And finally as mirrors they are loyal to their image, when properly focused – in the case of maths with the non-Euclidean postulates. SO they seem magic because we can ‘reconstruct’ reality from the image, build it from the template, make a machine from a flat bi-dimensional drawing. Still the best form of a language as of any 5D entity is the classic S=T balanced age. In mechanics that image is the Lagrangian formalism.

**Pentalogic on gravitational models: correspondence of its 4 formalisms.**

** ***In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.*

Thus regardless of pedantry in physics, the 4 formalisms of gravitation are equally valid, as they merely reflect the degree of detail in our analysis, either in ‘space=static’ form (Relativity-curvature) or dynamic motion (Newton), from a dual scalar view (Poisson gradient), or based in the conservation principles of the 3 ‘parts’ of a physical system (Lagrange). We shall then use here the earliest, most evident, simpler dynamic view – Newton’s timespace vortex, to unify mathematically the 2 limiting scales of the galaxy: the quantum world of charge vortices & the cosmological scale of mass space-time vortices.

The principles that matter are Einstein’s equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we extend to all scales. So an attractive cyclical force is an accelerated clock of space-time, a ‘vortex’ of any scale:

Newton is a dynamic view, Einstein a static one. Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. As it is a spatial view of ‘still derivative pictures’ of the gravitational motion it is more detailed than Newton’s because it is according to the Galilean paradox (S=T) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.

Lagrange’s on the other hand is a complete different view, as it does not take the S=T geometric-temporal perspective *but the principles of conservation of a physical organism St(angular momentum) < ST-energy>ts-lineal momentum. But all those principles ultimately derive from 5D metric. In the case of Newton>Poisson> Einstein, the vortex law, V(t) x R(s)=k, in any number of dimensions (3 in this case), the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, from the conservation of energy, S=T, as the balanced point of present of all systems. *

*Einstein’s just *reduces the temporal continuous Newtonian view of a spacetime vortex into an ∞ number of infinitesimal detailed pictures, focusing not on the speed but on the curvature of the vortex (which is the spatial definition of a moving cyclical speed – the faster it turns, the more curvature it has in ‘still mathematics’).

Languages are mirrors that reflect a part of the whole information with a bias and different detail: the more detailed the mirror of mathematical formalism, the more difficult to see the forest. Further on as the entangled Universe has multiple elements 5 Dimotions there are mirrors who focus more in one or another view.

What we call precise physics is such because humans no longer care to understand with the synoptic verbal, logic language what they talk about. So they just care to measure with maths and the praxis of using those measures to construct GPS, machines etc. Then the ego-paradox makes them believe that is truly the whole matter -as Kepler with his God as a clocker.

**Einstein’s Equivalence: Bidimensional mass. Dimensions of gravitational space-time.**

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: St (relativity, dominant in form as a still formal, *informative,* description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time)≈ Ft (Newton – dominant in dynamic motion) <-> Ps (Poisson, dominant in past spatial field/gradient-form)≈ Si (Lagrange, dominant in the analysis of the balances of entropic motion-energy):

Ts: Newton is a moving clock-like vortex of Time of the same mass-motion regions less detailed and more dynamic.

TT: Poisson is a potential static field of entropic motions with a gradient-direction.

ST: Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

St: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a present still, formal description in of gravitational space-time.

All of them are equivalent as Einstein derived his, via Poisson from Newton. An today AMD theory transforms Relativity;’s informative mappings of the galaxy space-time into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.

“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.

The pedantic scholar rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, the final saying on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or St, St, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 p.p.v.s of reality: St< =>St.

All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).

So we can consider the simpler Newtonian view, the MOST important as the wider, less detailed more comprehensive ðime view of the phenomena of physical time clocks, and for that reason we have used it here. The Einstein formalism IS a simultaneous measure of maximal ‘precision’ of detail, which includes together both scales of gravitation (∆-3 plane) and the energy-matter of electromagnetic worlds that ‘flows’ through it, in feeding paths along the gravitational faster, lower scale. So we are getting with more information more precision. Yet however both descriptions, the shallower Newtonian description in a single plane with larger time-latitude and Einstein’s means the same. If we complete Wheeler’s famous conceptual dictum: ‘the scale of gravitational spacetime guides the Locomotion of waves of energy and electromagnetic particles, which in-form and curve the scales of gravitational space-time’.

In between those two points of view; which we might call the temporal, Newtonian view and the spatial, mental, formal view of details of Einstein an write it in I-logic as ∆ð (Newton) ≈ (Poisson) ≈ §@ (Einstein); we had the intermediate Poisson’s gradient formulae.

Those are the 3 views of time vortices. The 4^{th} one *is conceptually different which is the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian formula, which is to so much focused on the past to future motion to form field>particle view of the simplex dimotions of the system* but in a ‘present-energy’ complex social view and reproductive view of the whole ensemble of elements together, based in the conservation principles of ‘least time’ and efficiency of the system.

**RECAP**. There are 4 canonical ∆ªst descriptions of gravitation as: @-mental, still ‘instantaneous, curvature forms (relativity) of maximal detail, as St-orbital vortices of motion, as ∆-gradients of scalar form and as Ts world cycles or zero sums, in the Lagrangian version. Te understand why physics have 4 variations of it, we must accept an ∆@ST-ructure for reality, and the duality of GALILEAN relativity: T-motion ≈ S-tatic dimension.

**CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. 4D AS A 5D LIMIT REDUCES TIME TO ENTROPY AND SCALES TO A SINGLE PLANE. **

*The 5 ^{th} dimension is also the key to resolve the pending questions of physical sciences. *So, we shall respect the correspondence principle and translate the laws of relativity to 5D, to prove the veracity of both dimotions of time,

*which are needed together to fully account for all the possible ‘dimensional motions’ (ab. dimotions) of the scalar space-time Universe. Since*the 4D formalism is the ‘limit’ of 5D physics, when we ‘discharge’ times=changes of information reducing all the types of change=time of reality to translation in space (entropy and locomotion) and its mathematical formula, v=s/t in Galilean relativity, S

^{2}=S

^{2}(x,y,z)-(ct)

^{2}in Einstein’s Relativity. And when we ‘compress’ all the scalar planes of space-time of the fifth dimension into a single space-time plane continuum, discharging all its organic and sentient properties, which we shall soon show are a direct consequence of 5D metric functions.

The expansion of stiences introduced by a 2^{nd} pole of internal change=time, evolution of form, of information and scalar space and its co-existing organic laws studied before only in biology is so vast that despite the cult to relativity physicists, our Baconian ‘tribal idols’ of science, our ‘seers of time’ (Augustine’s definition of God), their beliefs in simple ‘worldlines’ seem to the 5D expert, doodles on the sand, traced with a single rudimentary stick – that of lineal space-time. Reductionism follows those limits. Since as Parmenides already proved, the one is a sterile; the line is a perfect but destructive entropic sword – a single time dimension cannot generate anything. Only when we have two poles connected by the inverse properties of form=still space and time=motion, across multiple space of size=scale, *this entangled trinity will account for the whys of every event and form of the Universe in ‘exist¡ence’. *

All this is covered, as in any other model of reality, as time goes by and the ‘3^{rd} age of excessive’ information sets in, by making things unnecessarily complicated with too much details that cover the falsehood of the model. It is then necessary to understand *in parallel to the errors and strengths of 4D physics, the fact that its excessive complexity does NOT make it any better when the model has important flaws. So we shall use the pentalogic method earlier on those texts to show that the 5 models of relativity and its analysis of the Galilean paradox (S=T, motion is indistinguishable from form) are logic sides of the same pentacoin. *

Still we need to consider by the correspondence principle what can be ‘saved’ from the old paradigm…

**Its 5 Principles. Masses & Charges as scalar space-time vortices. Unification of forces.**

Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Time curves space into mass.’ *Einstein*

We apply the correspondence principle and prove that Einstein’s previous paradigm on 4D space-time, based in the following 5 postulates/functions, is the theoretical limit of 5D in a single light spacetime plane:

__–____ Relativity postulate__ that states we cannot distinguish motion=time from dimension=position=form=space, which in 5D we reduce to a simple formula, S≈T; we shall call the Paradox of Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) as he couldn’t explain why the Earth moves but we perceive it in mental space as a still dimension.

– __Denial of Newton’s Absolute space-time__; as he said ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start physics from its foundations’ and ‘I am the only physicist who believe there are ∞ time speeds in the Universe’, which we made explicit accepting Leibniz’s relational concept of spacetime, precursor of generational space-time, resumed in a sentence: ‘we are the scales of space we occupy and the cycles of time our existence lasts’.

– __Constancy of light speed__, c that in a 4D single background plane of light space-time corresponding to the galaxy holds naturally, as *light in a relational->Generational theory is the space-time of the galaxy*, which generates through its ‘accelerated’ vortices of space-time in a crescendo of ever more dense scales, photons, electrons, quarks, atoms, molecules, matter states, cosmic bodies and black holes. Yet when we add a 5^{th} Dimension sum of all those scales, c-speed becomes the limit when we reduce all the potential scales of the Universe to light space-time and the particles generated by it. And so we define a second metric function for all scales: Ts (Space size) x St (cyclical time frequency) = Constant; meaning smaller scales of space hold faster rotating particles, (black holes beyond the event horizon, where there is no longer ‘light’) or when moving in lineal fashion can go faster than light speed in scales below light or outside galaxies, (Bohm’s quantum potential of action at distance cause of entanglement, neutrinos outside galaxies.) As Si=Te maximizes SxT, both give the metric 5D function: Max. SxT=C, local to each Time§pace organism struggling to survive by Maximizing its St-in/form/ation & sT-energetic motion.

– __The principle of equivalence__ between Acceleration and mass, which we consider a strong principle, as a rotary accelerated vortex of space-time is a mass in the cosmological scale (ab. ∆+1), a thermodynamic Eddie in the human scale (∆º) or a charge in the quantum scale (ab.∆-1) Thus the principle can be written with parameters of space and time frequency as a case of 5D metrics, SxT=C, V(t)xR(s)=C, from vortices functions, to the 3D case, (** M, C) = ω^{2} r^{3} /U.C. (G, k) **which defines both charges and masses as quantum and cosmic vortices of 2 different 5D scales, whose G and k, Universal constants of S(curvature – Einstein’s formalism)= T(speed -: Newton’s), in 5D metrics have the measured 10

^{39}difference of strength, solving the hierarchy problem. Since paradoxically, the smaller, faster rotating charge is more attractive than the larger slower galaxy. Further on, in 5D space time vortex metrics a proton shows to have a Schwarzschild Radius, showing the scalar similarity between galaxies, as ‘atoms’ of a hyper-universe and dark expansive energy, as ¥-radiation between them.

–__ Energy-mass__, E(t)óM(§) in Planck Units coils entropic lineal motion into collapsing matter, E->M. As when the accelerated dark entropy between galaxies collapses into galactic mass, warping one-dimensional motion into 3D mass vortices (hence balancing the expansion of intergalactic space, 75% of dark entropy, into 25% of mass vortices, as 3x1D entropy becomes 1x3D masses; leaving the total volume of the fractal immortal Universe unchanged. While its inverse process is a scalar big-bang when a spatial space-time vortex, hold in its attractive position as an accelerated clock of time-space becomes entropic motion, uncoiling its form into lineal motion: M->E, in any 5D scale of spacetime; from a particle’s Beta Decay, through a Nova explosion, a galactic quasar, or perhaps a cosmic big-bang, a ‘hyperbolic’ theory of the whole, which we shall doesn’t hold in 5D as it studies only the entropic expansion of intergalactic space, ignoring the balancing collapse of entropy into galactic masses, doesn’t pass the epistemological laws of truth – known case, experimental evidence beyond local measures, correspondence principle with the known-known laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum and baryon numbers), and we falsify in the paper on Cosmology, concerned with the building up of an epistemologic sound model of the fractal, organic, immortal 5D cosmos.

Thus we call the new 5D model Absolute Relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time dimotion of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric function’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word would be ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’ proper of all minds, which model reality with its shortcomings. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

**RECAP. **The metric function of balance and feed-back SóT, between the spatial, informative mental pole and the reproductive, cyclical motions of Time becomes the basis of Relativity and all physical motions, establishing the fundamental ‘beat’ of all local space-time organisms of the Universe. The principle of correspondence consider the 4th Dimensional formalism the limit of 5D in a single ‘space-time scale’, equivalent to Galileo’s formula, V=s/t which special relativity adapted to the ‘contraction’ (-ct) experimented when the speed of a system reaches the limit of our thermodynamic planes of space-time, on the border of the quantum/cosmological, ∆±3 plane or light space-time continuum and General relativity adapted to the cosmological, gravitational ∆+±4 plane of the fifth dimension; which requires for a full understanding a more advanced knowledge of 5D metrics and Physics. So we shall return latter to those themes and also deal with them in detail in our papers on cosmology and quantum physics.

In the galaxy the same balance happens between the vortices of mass-time and the entropic time expansion of energetic vacuum spatial information. In terms of the 3 ilogic dimotions of past-entropic time, future-informative time vortices, the intermediate state, combines both: What we call present time is the dynamic, feed-back repetition of reality which seems not to change because it repeats the same cycles. Physicists have reduced time to the dimotion of entropy, born of its worldly profession of making weapons and transport machines – even to the point of ignoring in the cosmos the balancing imploding informative action of gravitation that collapses vacuum energy into mass, so they can maintain that the Universe is only expansive vacuum between galaxies (the so called big-bang theory).

** **

**SS: PHYSICAL MINDS: SPACETIME VORTICES.** **EQUVALENCE PRINCIPLE. **

*In the graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale. *

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆^{±1 }scales.

All what exists is a motion in time. Space forms are still pictures of those motions – a Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

So we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = C, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster metabolic rates than an elephant.

And vice versa, larger systems in Nature must have a space-distance=time-speed much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.

*A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space.* Attraction laws are then evident and intuitive: In the same manner a vortex of a storm attracts more the faster it turns, sucking in its surroundings, any accelerated space-time vortex, increases the speed of the mass/charge clock according to 5D C=st metric, the smaller it is (S) and hence the smaller it turns, the more it attracts.

Once we do have a proper understanding of the 5 Dimotions of physics it is very easy to refound the science and its equations in far more straight-forward general laws proper of all space-time systems and solve most of the conundrums of physics, embroiled by the error of lineal time and single space-scales.

Since as long as physicists don’t accept ‘duality’, trinity and pentalogic, the use of entropy and information as equal dimotions of time, they will not be able to resolve the conceptual contradictions of its disciplines.

It is just another ‘practical case’ derived from the scalar fifth dimension, which first was rightly (even if the maths were somewhat faulty) introduced in conceptual terms by Kaluza and Klein as a mode to unify ‘two different scales’ of size of the Universe, the gravitational ‘c’ scale and the ‘Planck’ h-scale, which are the two limits of the galaxy’s 5th dimension metric: S(c) x T(h) = Cst.

What mattered of his concept now forgotten is its idea that both scales could be unified if we treated them with a similar jargon, which for obvious reasons could only be the jargon of ‘Relativity’, derived from Poisson’s jargon, derived from Newton’s jargon of ‘vortices of space-time’ – our cyclical clocks and orbits of planets above. So for sake of simplicity we shall use the easy Newtonian jargon, to unify both scales according to 5D metric – the so long seek Unification equation of charges and masses.

The unification of the 5 forces in terms of its 5D metric scalar equations, and its equivalence with the 5 dimotions of the galactic organism requires a deep understanding of the S=T paradox that makes any ‘state of stop-space’ equivalent to a ‘motion in time’. So *we can study mathematically with different ‘spatial, topologic’ vs. algebraic, temporal equations and ceteris paribus perspectives every event of time-space; which accounts for the diversity of formulae for the same forces:*

**UNIFICATION OF 5 GALAXY’S FORCES AS ITS 5 DIMENSIONAL MOTIONS WITH SCALAR SYMMETRIES.**

Ssince a charge is smaller than a mass, it attracts much more and the unification equation follows just when we apply 5D metric, and shrink the galaxy in the same proportion we accelerate them. Then both equations match:

So mass, E=mc^{2} + E=hƒ; hence mass = frequency (h/c^{2}) is a cosmological slow vortex, and charge a quantum faster more attractive vortex.

Further on since curvature is synonymous of cyclical speed, it can be quasi-infinite in the smaller vortex, when measured in time speed as the speed of angular rotation. So if we were to apply 4D curvature’s equations (Einstein) instead of Newton, the results would be the same, just in the far more complicated formalism of EFE.

Those are the essential concepts to define charges and masses as accelerated time vortices of two different scales of the Galaxy. And from that it is only just an easy task of mathematical manipulation to unify them in 5D metric, as both are equal: when we slow down the speed, space enlarges to remain co-invariant. And as it happens a Hydrogen atom enlarged to the size of a galaxy slows down in rotation to the angular momentum of the galaxy. So Kaluza–Klein were *right – the fifth scalar dimension unify *gravity with electromagnetic *forces but in a fractal manner, with 5D metric, unbeknownst to physicists.*

The fundamental consequence of treating charges and masses as accelerated SS-vortices of spacetime is obvious: both are just vortices of two different scales of the 5^{th} dimension, which frame the limits of human perception of the Universe, so we can unify both with a simple translation of 5D Metric C=SxT such as if we expand a charge and decelerate its speed it will reach the size of a galaxy, while its electron will reach the size of the star nebulae that surrounds each black hole=proton.

Let us do the maths in the simpler Newton’s formalism, whereas by the paradox of Galileo S (Curvature) = T (accelerated motion). So the Universal Constants (G, k), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales (∆ is the symbol for the different ±¡ scales of the fifth dimension within a given organic system). Its formalism of a vortex of time space is then Newton’s Unification Equation: *M,Q= ω ^{2} r^{3} /U.C.(G,k)*

It applies to all vortices of time-space from particles to planets to galaxies. For example if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain k with a 10^{39} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem. As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, so it is symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It works marvels when we translate electromagnetic jargon to Newtonian jargon. For example it shows the ‘isomorphism’ (systemic jargon for an equal ‘form’ between scales) between atoms and galaxies, which H-atoms of the cosmic scale.

*Since when* we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and its electronic orbitals its star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos.

Let us put some easy numbers by substituting the parameters in that Unification equation for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G, which any high school student can do:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7} rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{ˆ3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal systemic view of the fifth dimension was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16} rad. sec. -1 = w (electron); 5.3 × 10^{-11} m. (Bohr radius); proton mass = 1.6 × 10^{ -27 }kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39} stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{ˆ2}*.

Since in that expression

*M*is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant is a gravitational constant, and c, light speed, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black star.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is isomorphic to the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

Those results (more than a decade old), are a *1 ^{st} theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the 3

*standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal self-similar structure as $t (Space population) x ð§ (Temporal frequency) entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

The unification equation of the two similar – NOT equal – scales of physics can be cast in 4 basic Dimotion perspectives (as usual the entropic death dimotion is a complete different anti-view that is not coded or reflected):

The unification equation of the two similar – NOT equal – scales of physics can be cast in 4 basic Dimotion perspectives (as usual the entropic death dimotion is a complete different anti-view that is not coded or reflected):

Galaxies, (Galaxies≈Atoms) thus resolve the philosophical question on how many 5D scales exist; as we find enough self-similarity to ‘run again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal) both by quantitative and qualitative methods between the atom and the galaxy. A question that might be extended to the ST dualities of open, ‘entropic strings’ and closed ‘cyclical informative strings’, in a possible larger and smaller scale of microscopic strings and superstrings:

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Philosophy of stience would then argue that those scales are real, but part of its self-similarity is mental: that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10^{±30} scales.

What about the Hyperuniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

The scalar unification of forces opens up an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, but fractal relativity, the description of the ∆-1 quantum world as a similar scalar plane of space-time to the ∆+1 cosmologic world.

So what about the unification of the other forces in scalar couples? It follows immediately when we consider them the scalar symmetry and similarity of the 5 Dimotions of the galaxy:

The Scalar similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is immediate as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). While the weak force is NOT a force but the evolution of the families of particles between scales.

Because physicists only consider one scale and one time dimotion they are obliged to model all those forces, with lineal concepts reducing them all forcefully into an exchange of lineal particles, when they are clearly different forces. For example the weak force that happens in a single point transforming a particle into one o a higher scale of larger masses, is represented with a gap that ‘exchanges’ the W-particle, NOT as Fermi shown first, an evolution of a higher particle into a heavier one, that then suffers an entropic process of dissolution in 3 parts.

Such 5D variety of forces makes possible the organic functions and structure of self-similar atoms and galaxies. So we couple forces according to their ∆±1 ‘symmetry of scale’ as 5 forces equivalent to the 5 dimensional motions, ab. Ð¡, of physical systems within galaxies. They must be studied in dualities, belonging to two different scales – the cosmological, ∆+1 scale (gravitation & dark energy) and the ∆-1 quantum scale (strong force and electromagnetism); whereas the dualities relate gravitation and strong forces and electromagnetism and dark energy; while a transformative, ‘weak force’ trans-forms particles between 5D scales.

**RECAP. **Because all systems made of scales of vital space that last a tie cycle, they all have bio-topo-logic properties. So we need *always 3 scalar perspectives that give 3 symbiotic properties. In the galaxy we talk of: *

- A scalar view that defines a galatom, by similarity of the atomic and galactic scale unified with 5D metric.
- A Human view that defines the
**galaxy**, our present single perspective with a single light spacetime continuum. - A Galactic view that defines a ‘
**galacell’**that is the galaxy as an organism, controlled by ‘DNA-like’ black holes. So we can now study the galaxy as an organic system with its 5 Dimotional, organic networks of forces.

Haldane said, the universe is more complex and strange than humans can understand or even imagine. Yet its basics are simple – a property of fractals that by self-repetition and recombination originate from a simple Generator equation, infinite variations of the same theme: the scalar supœrganism.

** **

**The twin paradox…**

Relates to the conservation of ST-PRESENT existential energy in ‘closed world cycles’. As it is a motion that is NOT accelerated in lineal fashion, but *closing a conserved energy-cycle, a full world cycle of time. S*uch 0-sums last longer in time; as they are closed bidimensional long lasting informative time cycles, while lineal motions ARE entropic, fast dying short time perspectives.

In terms of death and life equations:

Max. T x Min. S = Lineal big-bang Death (a explosion or expansion in lineal space with no time): Max expansion in space x Min. Cyclical Time duration: Max. $T x min. §ð

Max. S x Min. T = dimotion of Life towards higher information (a series of information cycles with slow time happening in minimal space) : maximal duration in time-information; minimal extension in space.

S=T, dimotion of balance and immortality. Closed life world cycle

The twins paradox means that ‘lineal, entropic motions’ are faster in time and live shorter than cyclical, closed paths. This relates directly to the 5^{th} dimension definition of life, death and entropy: time is cyclical, and a cycle in terms of ‘lineal space’ implies a certain acceleration (at least angular, often with decelerations and accelerations in motion). This is what truly slow down time. While a lineal motion accelerates its entropic passing.

So death is short, life is long; death states (antiparticles) are short. We see few corpses (and less antiparticles cause they last shorter) than living and particles. Big bangs happen in a quanta of time and so on.

Thus the twin paradox *is* real, because IT IMPLIES the twin to go back and forth, closing a conserved world cycle of time-energy. while the twin on earth is just moving or staying in a non-closed state.

Ultimately is the same effect that a vortex of timespace where time tends to ‘zero’ in the gravitational frame of reference. As we expand those pages we shall apply a deeper pentalogic analysis and then in a second revision a mathematical analysis to all the concepts expressed here.

In those terms, from the point of view of ∆-1, as motion is reproduction of form; an accelerated frame of reference paradoxically slows down such reproduction because it increases the mass of the system, and hence the time required for each reproductive cycle.

While from an S=T perspective, as *the system moves closer to c-speed, it spends more time in the wave-moving state, reducing the ‘tics’ of the passing of time, which happen for all systems in the Stop-particle state.*

By the principle of correspondence, we can clarify from 5D metric equations of physics, which apply to all systems, not only physical (as those equations of life and death) the laws of any science including obviously physical sciences. We do NOT need to go into the ‘explanations’ of those facts provided by physicists, available in any book of relativity. What we do is to extract from facts of science the larger, wider formalism of 5D fractal, cyclical space and time, which is the jargon ABOVE that of any science.

**RECAP.** The core of special relativity expressed in 5D reduces to postulates in the ∆-3 light scale, where the constancy of light speed *within the vacuum background of the galaxy takes place. *

* *

**PART II. THE 5 DIMOTIONS OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS**

**5 ACTIONS=DIMOTIONS IN PHYSICS. PENTALOGIC ANALYSIS.**

**The 5 dimotions of space-time in matter. The arrow of entropy in physics. Its philosophy.**

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is what reality is about. If we call Space=form and time=motion, S and T, then we can write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t), according to which each species made of spatial energy and temporal form tries to maximize its survival, in a point of balance in which its ‘exi=stential force’ is maximal; avoiding the extremal points of TT-entropy=death. This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating ∞ local present variations that put together form reality*.* This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5^{th} Dimension an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism or General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which we also use as the acronym of the Generator of Space-Time

All what you see around is a combination of forms of space with motion in time. So the fundamental particle is a spacetime system with different gradations of those 2 elements, which give us 5 ‘States of spacetime’ or sTages of timespace: SS-still form or ‘language/mind/seed’ of pure information without external or internal motion; St-information, form-in-action, form with a little motion; ST=energy, which balances both; sT-locomotion, an internal form (which physicists treat as a point-particle) with external motion. And finally entropy, TT, external and internal motion that produces the scattering of ¡ts cyclical repetitive clocks of time, killing the system broken into ¡ts ∑∆¡-1 parts.

The 2^{nd} organic principle of reality is the fact that *forms of space till the smallest particle are cyclical iterated closed motions that appear as fixed forms to a slow perceptive being. So all is in reality, T time-motion and TS-reproduction, but we perceive only as motion a lineal translation and as form a cyclical memorial pattern. Reproduction of formal motions, conserved 0 energy cycles, ST is then the essential dynamic iterative present as we say: “All is ST-energy that combines, S-form and T-motion to re=produce the ∞ ST-beings in exist¡ence’. *

*So *we write a simple equation for the Universe; ∑ST. And in more detail, we find most systems try to find the balance of ‘repetitive iterative energy presents’: Max.∑SxT (s=t). As the product of those 2 parameters or ‘*existential momentum’* is maximized when S=T (10×0<9×1…<5×5). So this is the function of exis¡tence. Te Exi=ST you balance T-motion & S-form in iterative ST-cycles of energy. The equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back ¡logic Topology that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the ∞ local present variation you see around including yourself*.* This is the essence of the organic Universe…

*T*hen there is the scalar 5^{th} Dimension that determines the organic structure of parts and wholes syncronizing the ∞ ST-clocks of reality: S-ize in Space x Speed of T-ime cycles = Constant. SxT=C, a vortex law that explains Kepler’s law, the acceleration inwards of galaxies; the acceleration of life as we increase our information and shrink and warp, as ‘time bends space’ (Einstein). The fact that smaller chips calculate faster Algorithms, closed paths of circuitry, that small rats have faster metabolisms, that genes code information of larger wholes as they store more of it in faster frequency, that quantum numbers code molecules because their particles tick faster.

So two sets of laws conform the fractal, organic Universe, laws of scale of which SxT=C is the metric equation of the fifth dimension of all the sum of scales; and topological laws of spacetime (topology being the branch of maths that studies forms with motion, time-space forms, and its 3 ‘varieties’ in a single plane, St<ST<Ts, between the pure seed-mind with no motion, a mirror of the outer Universe, 0’x∞=C, SS. And the TT-entropic explosion that expands the space-time of the system but looses its information. So we can now keep analyzing TT-entropy, enclosing it into a larger view of time, the ‘worldcycle’ of life and death caused by the sequential pattern of those 5 dimotions from birth in a seed of pure in/form/ation, through life into a TT-entropic death:

**In biology,** the worldcycle happens from SS-eed to youth (Ts) of maximal motion dominated by limbic systems, to ST (reproductive age dominated by the reproductive blood network) to old age (St, dominated by information) we move into entropy, when ‘time reversal’, stops information and dissolves it. *And this pattern forms the worldcycle of life and death: SS<Ts>ST>St<<TT, which we will find it happens in all systems and puts together the 5 Dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), the unit of ‘action’ in the Universe, including the ‘actions’ of physical sciences.*

We shall thus study in each scale of physics the 5 dimotions of existence starting from the simplest form, the photon.

*The 5 dimensions of light space, coding the 5 dimotions of photons.*

In the graph all Stientific organisms *are synchronous knots of Vital dimotions=*actions, which are the knots and bolts of any time§paœrganism. The way huminds perceive those actions as ‘dimensions of space’ or ‘motions of time’ or ‘social frequencies in time’ or ‘social populations’, or ‘cyclical systems’ or ‘metabolic paths of existential energy’ or ‘evolutions in deep time’, etc. etc. vary enormously according to species, scales, length of time perception etc.

Because we exist in light space-time, those actions in light appear *as dimensions of space, or social frequency *colors (since the fastest light cycles absorbed by our electronic eyes, transform its populations in space appear in time frequencies). In physical atoms, those dimotions are coded by space-time dimotions, represented by quantum numbers.

In cellular life are coded by genetics (4-5 letters). In humans they are coded by the so called drives of life.

Certain general laws of 5D actions will be of great use to translate mathematical equations in the revision of those papers. As the sum of all those actions are balanced by ooposition to each other into zero-sums in death (SS v. TT, St vs. Ts, S=T). Yet it is an asymmetric creative balance, as the dimotions have a longer path of life that increases information from the monad= mind’s p.o.v. Hence we all warp, wrinkle & get old in the 3^{rd} age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

In the graph, we find the 5 elements of light that code its actions of motion (length: c-speed), energy (width: magnetic field), information (High electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory.) *Those dimensions become then the canonical dimensions of all evolution of light beings. So all of them use the height dimension to code information, the length dimension to move, and the width dimension to store fat energy. *

*The 5 quantum numbers coding the dimotions of particles. *

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masse, û, than from individuals and the laws of superorganisms, studied in the first line – the common game that makes emerge through 4^{th} postulate of ¬æ networks a whole, indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.

The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species.

So T.Œ can explain this perspectives and plug them all within the GENERAL GAME Of existence and evolution from parts into wholes (5^{th} more complex set of reproductive and social actions, ∑œ=û+1

And once we do understand the Disomorphisms of the Universe we can plug into them all the systems of reality and enter into the details of the thoughts of god.

So the main perceptions of classic physical equations are:

– The field perceptions of physical systems as forces, which includes often an Sæ>Te geodesic analysis.

And Ts<ST>St ternary analysis. So to complete the main ways of studying physical systems, we must add studies in which we consider the ExI>Te ‘true physical system of wave-particles, body-heads’, which are the essential vital element of physical Universes.

But there is a third key description that of the body-head/wave-particle of the system.

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence) :Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1^{st} locomotion, feeding age ->2^{nd} reproduction age ->3^{rd } informative, social age-> entropic death that splits the parts of the being vs. social

evolution into a whole.

*Scale. *In scale the mind is a system that MAKES the whole ‘travel through the 5^{th} dimension’. And an essential law of 5D is the fact that a given fractal point or T.œ will perceive only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts information, above the ∆±4 blind undistinguishable limiting plane from where it will extract entropy of motion. So its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D, which each main action related to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

It is an extremely important law, as it implies also an infinite universe, since obviously the two self-similar extremes of quantum and galactic T.œs must enlarge those scales beyond our perception. And indeed, quantum realism (Broglie-Bohm’s theory, ab. B^{2}) imply a quantum potential of faster than c speed (according to 5D metric), and dark entropy a field of forces beyond c in a larger nested hyper-universe.

Those intervals are fractal dimensions in classic Euclidean geometry and often invaginated by the networks of the system which as all its motion can be also ‘waves of energy’, such as electromagnetic waves that act as networks ‘scaling upwards’ and ‘downwards in size’ accelerating in frequency (5D). So a huge field of analysis is the connections of each T.œ, with its scales, including social supœrganisms, which seeds prophets of verbal thought – the language or ∆-1 scale – and extract its energy from human individual workers, soldiers and so on.

RECAP. Each plane of existence conserves the actions of space-time, either measured as ‘actions’ in quantum physics as molecular motion or as speed in gravitation and its associated ‘momentums’.

**The beats and scales between actions.**

It is then evident that in the architectonical stair of reality, next to the study of individual dimotions we must study chains of dimotions, which form ‘stœps’ (stops for a dimotion of information, step for a dimotion of energetic motion), in search of the ultimate s=t balance. So we move and stop the leg on the floor, move and stop. We perceive (1D) and move (2D). We feed entropically (5D) and evolve internally the parts we eat into larger organic forms (4D). The dual beats of existence between inverse Dimotions become then the first of many sequential chains that will rise the finitesimal actions of the being to complete finally its worldcycle.

As those dimotions have ‘different’ discontinuous beats according to 5D, which defines from where we extract them, all the dimotions must be entangled by synchronicity, to each different ‘beat’ regardless of speed, meets with other symbiotic dimotion. I.e. the dimotion of perception has a faster beat, because it extracts pixels of information from the smallest ∆-3 scale as it carries faster T.œs (light photons) with more information to make better mind mappings. So we perceive every second, the minimal quanta of our temporal energy. The 5Dimotion of entropic feeding however has larger bits, because we want to minimize the 4D reconstruction process, so we eat ∆º organisms we hunt then kill with the function of death, ∆º«∆-2, reducing it down to cells down to amino acids, to reconstruct their scales. So feeding has a far larger time beat that perception as it takes far larger ∆-¡ scales (SxT=C), and animals feed once a day. But reproduction is even slower, as we must reconstruct a whole human being, NOT from the undistinguishable scale of amino acids, but with a code written at ∆-1 cellular level; so we reproduce every year in fertile ages of Si=Te balance. Synchronicity then kicks between our inner ∆-1 smaller scale of cells with faster life cycles, which will synchronize its slow reproductive action taken place at ∆-1 faster cycles with symbiotic faster feeding actions of the slower ∆º whole: so as a whole we eat a day, and that food allows the cell to reproduce every day.

Let us start building up revision after revision the 5 Dimotions of the main scales of physical systems in the galatom.

**EEDS & @- MINDS IN THE UNIVERSE**

**THE GALATOM: A 5Ð³Galaxy of 11 isomorphisms.**

The fundamental super organism of the physical Universe is the cosmological, ¡+3 galaxy, whose minimal unit is the ¡-3 atom; with man sandwiched in the center, as an ∆0 thermodynamic being.

Hence the galaxy-atom with the human thermodynamic scale in between form a ternary super organism. And since all super organisms, by definition have the same fifth dimensional metric, $ x ð = K, to PROVE the galatom is a supœrganism we just need to unify both limiting quantum and cosmological scales and its CHARGE AND MASS vortices of time with that simple theoretical ‘principle’: *as we slow down the atom and increase its size ‘magically’ its $ x ð = Co-invariant metric will give us the average size and speed of the galaxy; and the electromagnetic force will be reduced in ‘strength’ to the force of gravitation.*

Alas! You might think, easier told than done, as the unification of charges and masses and the proper explanation of the nature of forces and why there are 4 is the saint grail of physics in 4Ð, but trivial in 5Ð. Let us do so, in the simplest formalism of newtonian time-space vortices.

**DUAL @- SINGULARITY (CHARGE-MASS-EDDIE): The unification equation of masses and charges. **

In an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).

So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the graph, *the 0-1 Dimension of a particle-state or vortex of accelerated time, the key element to understand the *creation and destruction of symmetric dimensions of time (distance, motion, acceleration) back and forth into dimensions of space (length, width, height).

A key element of a physical system is the singularity ‘membrain’, which includes as in any key system of nature, a center that processes information and a membrane that encloses and breaks the system into an inner region, the T.œ and an outer region, the Universe. This dual system IS the COVER AND CENTER of a topological open ball, which is the vital energy enclosed by the system, which DOES NOT EXIST as a full T.œ unless those 2 elements are formed. Consider the case of ‘Mass’. Energy contributes to ‘mass’, but if we do NOT have an enclosure we cannot measure mass, as energy is moving around and there is nothing to ‘weight’. Yet as soon as we close the membrane, the mass parameter will exist, as measured externally by the membrane.

Further on, as the membrane is CLOSING the inner region, which we normally do NOT access, or else we will have to tear the membrane and then mass might escape and a continuity equation will have to be applied to assess the flow of mass in and out, we cannot truly measure the mass.

It is then obvious that the ‘parameter’ of ‘density-weight-charge-angular momentum-rotational speed’ etc, *tends to accumulate in each scale in the external region, where the ‘mass-force’ is maximal; while in the inner singularity center, it reaches ‘zero value’, and that point is the mind-still singularity, where motion stops, and so in black hole equations time moves to zero in the singularity, in the vortex of an Eddie.*

A principle which classic physicists abhor but it is really the ice in the cake is the sentient nature of singularities which is proved by the fact they are the engine of the 5 survival actions of every part of the universe.

*The dimensional question: 1D singularities + 2D membranes (holographic information) = 3D vital energy.*

Now it is obvious that the eye of the hurricane and the eye of the black hole has maximal height as it is indeed the informative center of the system, in fact ‘infinite height’ in the axis of a black hole, which means that ‘motion stops’ in the perpendicular plane but shuts off as a yet of dark entropy and matter through the axis of superluminal speed according to the Kerr equations of a rotating black hole.

Because a clock is curved, we can see the new Ðimotion of information as a curvature on the dimotion of lineal time. This would be the first step for an extension of great importance in 5Ð theory: the holographic principle.

In 1993, the physicist Gerard ‘t Hooft put forward the holographic principle, which explains that the *information about an extra dimension is visible as a curvature in a spacetime with one fewer dimension*. For example, holograms are three-dimensional pictures placed on a two-dimensional surface, which gives the image a curvature when the observer moves. Similarly, in general relativity, the fourth dimension is manifested in observable three dimensions as the curvature path of a moving infinitesimal (test) particle. ‘T Hooft has speculated that the fifth dimension is really the *spacetime fabric*.

So again as in many cases we shall find indeed that inflationary ‘language-mirrors’ are all more or less right. Indeed, *the second dimotion of time, of form, of in-form-ation is seen as a ‘curvature’ of the first motion of lineal time. The holographic principle is then essential to many themes of this blog, upgraded to ST, SS and TT combinations, which we will be able to compare by dimensional analysis and further our understanding of space-time systems. And the fifth dimension is the ‘space-time fabric’, as it fabricates all other dimensions in scales. Let us see how.*

** **

**Ts DIMOTION: LOCOMOTION. SPATIAL FORCES. ENTANGLEMENT. RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED**

** ****LocoMotion is reproduction of form in a lower scale. Stœps=stops+steps**

Si=Te means any kind of Motion happens as a series of Stœps, as systems move a step, then gauge information in a stop position as the ∆±¡ plane provides it with pixels to orientate them, or a background motion deviates its lineal steps into cyclical motions. The proper way to write the function in dynamic terms is SóT

It is the essential beat of the cosmos in each of its fractal parts. If we consider space=form one of the poles of the Universe, and time*=*motion its 2^{nd} pole, we shall be able to reduce all phenomena of reality, from the function of the mind in one extreme of pure still form (creation of mental spaces) or SS; to the locomotion of species (Ts) and alternate gauging of information (St) and its reproduction in a middle term combination of both poles (SS), to the pure entropy of internal motion that kills the system and external motion that ‘scatters it’ around (TT) as the 5 dynamic views of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Space-time Universe.

What physicists call ‘time’ is only one of the 5 Dimotions of reality, locomotion, translation=change of position in space; not all the times of the Universe. Its power in our technological civilizations as makers of machines of TT- entropic destructive motion (weapons) or transport machines of Ts-locomotion, their work has ‘hidden’ all other analysis of timespace dimotions, such as those concerning deep time scales (geological motions of Earth’s supœrganism), biological information (evolutionary motions), Historic cycles (censored by power as they are provoked by the wrong evolution of the ‘bad fruits=weapons’ of the tree of science, which gives power to people-castes of history, etc.) Thus by the ‘correspondence principle, physical time, expressed by Galileo as V=s/t is the ‘limit’ of a theory of time-space dimotions reduced to locomotions.

**Reproduction of form in 5D and its essential mathematical tool: calculus.**

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time. This is the essence of it all. But space is a maya of the senses, the synchronous view of a series of cycles of time motions, knotted in the simultaneous perception of an observer; what physicists call a ‘frame of reference’.

Thus time=change is the fundamental element of reality, and this makes Algebra of time-change, specifically calculus perhaps the most important experimental science of time, besides logic, which we have upgraded to existential algebra, which explores the vital, organic whys of those changes.

It is the Galilean Paradox: S=T. We cannot distinguish time from form. In as much as each frame of reference or mind locks in a knot-mirror of the motions of the Universe from its point of view. So each point of space is a perceiver relative field of motions, which from its perspective knot as forces ‘attracted’ by its frame of reference. Yet if we cannot distinguish motion from form each point is entangled to those motions and is made of motion and form, of the particle and wave states.

For example, a single photon may exhibit wave interference with itself, and it can behave as a particle with definite and finite measurable position or momentum, though not both at the same time as per Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Since they are either moving and therefore having momentum as waves, or they are in the stop-particle position communicating information through neutrino? ≈gravitons? And then they have position. And we can analyze them in either state with precision but *not at the same time. T*hus the uncertainty principle in pentalogic has besides the ‘@-linguistic mirror view’ (abstract formulation proper of the ‘creationist philosophy of physics’ – see Physics and mind), a real ‘entropic=limiting view’, as the particle is ‘constantly moving’; hence if its minimal organic value as a quanta of ‘action’ (∆-1 scale of existence) of an organism of light E= h ƒ is h, called a ‘planckton’ in 5D at any time of measure, as in a ‘movie projection’ that goes from stop to step to complete a cycle, but *we cannot see both states of the film picture but only ½ of the cycle, missing the other ½, the quantum observer misses h/2=ExT (ST).*

*For example, in the nucleus we are not seeing 3 quarks in a position state, but the same quark in its ‘motion interval’ between 2 states of space-time, reason why we cannot break them and they have exactly the same charge than the electron, because its ‘transitions’ U(+2/3)->D(-1/3)->U(+2/3) as ‘T-motion’ sTates do give us a ±1 change . Only with enormous energy we can reproduce those quarks and then have 2 separated entities. **Nt.1*

Locomotion as reproduction of form solves the Paradoxes of Zeno and the meaning of discontinuity. As motion is reproduction of information, of form, since particles are knots of perception of form, fractal points, monads, that move by reproducing in a lower 5D plane, as ∆-1 waves, its information, as forms-in-action.

So all forms of change can be reduced to the ultimate function of existence, reproduction, a back and forth travel through 2 scales of the fifth dimension, as a form becomes a seed that reproduces, evolves socially and forms its whole again. *The extraordinary capacity of Calculus, which extracts at ∆-1 level a ‘finitesimal’ (Leibniz’s 1/n definition of infonitesimal as a minimal part of a whole and ALSO, by virtue of S=T, a minimal ‘curvature’ of a time cycle, which is then integrated for a time duration of the event, either locomotion, or volume of population in space or S=T continuous=smooth change in time happens precisely because CALCULUS perfectly mimics the process of change and reproduction of form between ∆º and ∆-1 scale which is the basis of all time-change also in physics. *Change thus is change reproduced in a lower plane as a seed that evolves into a whole.

And all this is what actually calculus calculates: It finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

It is then not so much in physics but in calculus where we find the strongest model of the laws of 5D and locomotion as a reproductive process of form, even if the experimental proofs are scattered all over physics. Indeed, the entire world of quantum physics can only make sense if we consider that particles move as waves and gauge information as stop particles. Because waves can be transparent to each other but particles collide. A simple proof: the atomic nucleus is so small compared to its particles that if they wouldn’t move as waves, transparent to each other, they would be always colliding and the nucleus would never remain stable. In fact, when we get pictures of those particles outside its shells, (electrons) they move in zig zag as they stop and change motion constantly. As usual physicists just make an axiomatic rule and subvert the law of causality converting the mathematical mirror derived of the fact in the cause of the fact – in this case they say this is due to the Pauli exclusion principle without providing *the mechanism for particles to avoid collision if moving. *

It follows that beings with more information, reproduce slowly and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life supœrganims on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

They are also essential to all the elements of calculus and mathematics at large and its *methods of solutions*; specially the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between two points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. So lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations.

What neither mathematicians nor physicists fully understand (though some inroads in abstract were made through the Noether’s concepts of symmetry) is that each stœp of a method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

**The persistence of memory.**

The duality of wave-particle Motion can also be described as the ‘persistence’ of memory, regarding the path of reproduction of the being, along consecutive stœps (stops and steps) of existence. Depending of the persistence and duration of each consecutive being, we will obtain, a ‘ternary wave’ of motion or a particle,

All physical motions happen in ternary wave states. AND DEPENDING on the persistence of the reproduced elements of the being, we talk of three changes of quantity:

When the wave is a perfect locomotion, the central wave has most of the momentum an the forehead an back packet of reproductive motion are not even ‘acquiring full form’ but are ‘virtual resonances’ of the being, which therefore has a steady state locomotion.

But when **motion **in space is near zero, an the persistence of the reproductive ‘offspring’ persists as long as the central ‘cell’, the motion is pure reproduction of the being into a process of social growth of population; and this the meaning of change of quantity in terms of reproduction

While inversely when the reproduction is near zero, the locomotion is near zero, an the persistence of the population of reproduced clones also near zero, as the system decays exponentially, each cellular part stopping its reproduction, quantity diminishes, an we talk of ‘decay’, the inverse reproductive motion to that of growth, which in its purest form is the exponential decay of all deaths of a system.

An so we have described all motions, changes and events of the Universe in terms of its 5 Dimotions, fusioning in the process the fundamental concepts, facts and philosophies of motion, worth to mention.

Thus beings with a lot of information, reproduce very slow and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life supœrganisms on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

**RECAP**. We trace the beginning of physics to 3 paradoxical principles, in which so much literature has been wasted by lack of clear thought;, Relativity, conservation and symmetry, principles derived of the nature of space and time, not magically caused by the mathematical language as creationist physicists think.

Relativity means that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: S=T. As Galileo found we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moves. As minds stop motion into form, into information, converted into distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

**S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:**

A dimension of spatial form can also be seen as a motion in time. Both together become a ‘Ðimotion’, the fundamental element of reality. It is the paradox of relativity of motion that started modern science but was not understood: Time Motions & space dimensions merge.

All dimensions of space have a hidden motion. This was proved when mathematicians realized Greeks still Geometry was part of a vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry has internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with must be a topological variety. In-form-ation, form-in-action thus was in fact a topological Ðimotion of space-time. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

**5D metrics and the basic equations of motion derived of it. **

First we lie down the concepts of the organic reproductive universe, l to keep it simple. Thus the next step for building a sounder view of physics, departs from the simplest equations of mathematical physics – we can say as Descartes did in his ‘Discourse de la method’ where he left for future generations further developments of analytic geometry; that we leave for future AI or huminds the further developments of 5D physics and will stick to the basis; which require a lot of conceptual correction – indeed to start from scratch.

So we start from the mother of all battles, the function of existence that fusions 5D metrics and Absolute relativity, Max. SxT (s=t)=∆±¡, which puts together the metrics of 5D, $ (lineal space) x ð (cyclical time) = ∆st¡ and the principle of absolute relativity, S=T… **And Its development in 3±¡ ages:** Max. S x 0 T: Seed; Max. T x Min. S (youth), S=T (maturity) Max T x Min. S (3^{rd} Age), Max. T x 0 S (death)… to extract all other basic equations of physics, which correspond to the ‘ideal equations’ of a first course of physical sciences.

‘Those are the thoughts of God and the rest are details’ often born of the entangled connection between scales, of the imperfection of frictions and less efficient events and forms, of the entropy of dissolving structures…

As ultimately there is little to say of those complex ad ons but respect the mathematical apparatus of physicists that painstakingly have perfected so much their tools of measure – forgetting to explain what they measured.

Immediately a few basic equations of physics come out of that function of existence (S=T, Max. SxT, SxT=C:

The speed equation in cyclical terms, V=S/T becomes Vst= l($) x ƒ(ð); hence *an expression of 5D metrics.*

It is also the wave equation of present systems; the equation of ‘ST-energy’. And so the 1^{st} equation discovered in physics (albeit simplified into the lineal spacetime, V=s/t).

But energy which is a balance between Space=form and time=motion, by virtue of the principle of relativity that makes indistinguishable motion and form, hence all systems have both, S=T, can be written then as the existential energy of a system, which all organisms try to maximize, Max. S x T (s=t)… as two quantities S & T with a total value, ∆, maximize its product when S=T (5×5>6×4>9×1>10×0=0).

From this equation we obtain the evident fact that ‘all drop of ¥in=form has a drop of ¥æng=Kinetic energy. So form has a minimal motion, is in-form-ation form in action, St and motion has a bit of form, kinetic energy.

*Or else we get the two equations of death, T=0 x Max. S and S=0 x Max. T… *

Let us consider them in more detail, as we ‘study each of the scales of the Universe’.

First to notice that the Universe to be ‘immortal in time’, ‘infinite in space’ and ‘incommensurable’ in scale.

But why the equations of 5D metrics (speed, etc.) are a product of S and T while the equations of energy are a sum? This has to do with the ‘meaning’ of the 5 operands of Algebra, each one related to a certain dimotion and with the 3 ‘relative scales’ of reality. Actions are the minimal dimotions happening in a single quanta of time. So each minimal ‘action=dimotion=dimensional motion=Step and stop=Stœp must be integrated into a long path, and that is the ‘frequency’ that multiplies the dimotion.

In the case of energy* we are working NOT with the SxT=K but with the S=T *2^{nd} most important equation of 5D. Hence we call S=form=potential energy and T=motion=Kinetic energy, and the signs are the ± ones.

All in all, the Universe will conserve the total potential and kinetic energy in all its manifestations even if in its ‘maximal points’, they are redundant. But those maximal points of Ss=Maximal potential energy plus zero kinetic motion and vice versa, are really the ‘limits’ of existence of the system. I.e. if we stretch a spring beyond those limits it will likely deform and loose its capacity to return back, being damaged. And so we return to the ever pervading warnings that a pure Ss and pure Tt (mind and entropy, language and pure motion) are NOT living states, but ‘seeds’ and ‘time motions reservoir’ for the games to begin. Immortal both but truly not living; in one of the many philosophical contradictions of 5D.

Now the reader will be surprised that those few concepts and equations (lagrangians, Hamiltonians, balance equations, Laws of ‘balance’ are enough to understand all the laws of science, which are ‘its details.

But they require a conceptual understanding of the wrong principles of physics, notably the concepts of entropy and the principles of minimum potential energy that bring most physical systems to the points* of rest but only because they are part of a larger system that preys on it. *

Consider the familiar example of a marble on the edge of a bowl. If we consider the marble and bowl to be an isolated system, then when the marble drops, the potential energy will be converted to the kinetic energy of motion of the marble. Frictional forces will convert this kinetic energy to heat, and at equilibrium, the marble will be at rest at the bottom of the bowl, and the marble and the bowl will be at a slightly higher temperature. The total energy of the marble-bowl system will be unchanged. What was previously the potential energy of the marble, will now reside in the increased heat energy of the marble-bowl system. This will be an application of the maximum entropy principle as set forth in the principle of minimum potential energy, since due to the heating effects, the entropy has increased to the maximum value possible given the fixed energy of the system.

In 5D first this is a case of thermodynamic transfer of energy from the ∆º to the ∆-1 scale: ∆º (ball form)<∆-1 (thermal energy that is used by the molecules of the system) and also symmetrically an St<Ts<Tt equation ‘allowed’ of transfer of St-potential energy into Ts-locomotion & friction that becomes Tt-entropy. So the question here is ‘friction’. The fact that there is a contact, a ‘perpendicular’ 4^{th} postulate of Non-æ geometry, NOT a parallel motion subtly guided by the information transferred between the two points but a form of ‘collision’ in a disordered state, propitiated by the gravitational force. Alas, entropy is ‘sTupid’ and chaotic and arises ALWAYS when there is no information, Ss<St minds controlling the process.

In biology we find the same concept in a ‘herd’ of any animals even a flock of birds or a school of fishes that do NOT collide because information is shared to maintain them in ‘parallel’, which according to the 4^{th} Postulate of congruency implies a ‘superfluid motion’ with no entropy. Because physicists deny the Ss<St arrows of the Universe due to humind’s egocy (ego=idiocy) that reserves those properties only to humind’s non-Euclidean points BY DECREE, they will always consider ONLY Tt-friction cases, never mind superfluidity, black holes, bosons, superconductivity, negative zero K beta temperatures, etc. etc.

Temperature let us remind the reader is a measure of ‘entropy’, NOT of order, of kinetic energy but also of entropic collisions (as we measure it when molecules collide with our thermometers).

Thus Lagrangians and Hamiltonians , the modern equations of motion come from the ‘balanced’ S=T states. Let us just comment in a few differences between them, which are due to Calculus.

**The basic concepts of calculus.**

Mathematics is the best linguistic mirror after ‘existential algebra’ (the direct study of the laws of scalar space-time), mankind has found of the scalar space-time Universe. So we can easily correspond its 3 key disciplines with the 3 ∆St elements: geometry is the formal science of space and its unit the point; Algebra, the formal science of scale and its unit the number; and calculus the formal stience of time=change and its unit the finitesimal. However as the Universe is ‘entangled’ in trinity (single perceived scale) and pentalogic (3 scales of size co-existing together as in supœrganisms) *each discipline studies all other* structures.

But calculus needs also a bit of correction by introducing the concept of a ‘finitesimal’ that in Non-Euclidean geometry substitutes ‘absolute zeros’ that do not exist, as a cycle of time breaks space in an inner region, which is isolated by a membrane through which a relative infinite µ number of parallels cross through its ‘ideal’ openings of any membrane that connect the internal being with the outer world.

Those fractal points however in idealized Greek bidimensional geometry have no breath and so the internal parts are missing. So an absolute zero and a singularity can be defined. Not so in a fractal point which grows in information as we come closer and enter the internal zones. In Euclidean geometry the point is empty and so monads become mindless points. In reality all points ‘are a world in themselves’ (Leibniz). So for the organic point, a pi cycle made of 3 curved diameters (3 | = O), the apertures represent a 4% (π-3/π) not coincidentally the quantity of ‘the Universe which is not dark to our electronic eyes and vice-versa – an external observer will ONLY see a 4% of the point, inner world, confusing it often with an Euclidean dark space.

This is canonical. In physics we call such ‘fractal points’ blackbodies, and they are endemic. The entire galaxy in fact can be considered a ‘black body’ and its local big-bang radiation is a black body radiation. Of course, from that ideal number there might be different holes according to use. It is then a rule that of the radiation that will enter the hole, very little of it will get out again; the smaller the hole, the more nearly will all of the energy directed at the hole fail to get out again. And a balance is found between the need to perceive the outer world and the need to absorb the radiation. However fractal points do have apertures not only in the ∆+1 visible scale of the whole membrane but in the ∆-1 smaller ‘scale’ of finitesimal pores.

So finitesimals ARE the limit of Analysis, and the continuity and smooth concepts just idealizations useful for calculations as we define 3 types of finiteismals according to the symmetry between ∆≈S≈T parameters.

Thus we find that calculus which essentially consists in ‘fine tuning’ the measures of change of reality, studies not only time-change (frequencies of cycles) but also change in space (informative curvatures) and change in scale (social quantity). And to that aim it uses a concept, the ‘finitesimal’ today lost to philosophy of mathematics due to the errors of the axiomatic method of ‘egocy’ and ‘metalinguistics’ (mathematical creationism), which stretches the ‘limits’ of all systems to infinity. An infinitesimal as close to zero as we desire does not exist. A finitesimal of time, 1/T, space; 1/R and scale, 1/N does exist for each local real function. And what calculus does is to calculate the minimal ‘finitesimal’, 0’, of space, time or scale (the instant of Leonardo, the infinitesimal of Leibniz and its measure of curvature) and then across a length of lineal time, calculates by integration a ‘larger’ effect’ of change in space (curvature), time (speed) and scale (growth or diminution of populations).

In the praxis of calculus then we distinguish the finding of a finitesimal unit, which can belong to any of the trinity main ∆ST elements of reality, S-curvature, T-frequency or ∆-populations, and the finding of a period of study of that change – Length of the curve; period of time; ‘mass’ of populations.

Change then in calculus became stripped off human perception, through the abstraction of calculus.

Leibniz however seemed too deep for huminds and his humble truths were forgotten. So today the finitesimal is not ‘defined’ as the *2 *distorting and elements of reality, TT-entropy limits and SS-perceptive distortion were discharged for the idealism of larger infinities (∞) and no ‘limits’ of smallness (0) brought about by 0 and ∞ we substitute in 5D by 0’ and ∝ (relative 0 and relative infinity).* This has brought an unending number of errors notably in philosophy of science; mathematical physics and cosmology (the big-bang infinitesimal singularity does NOT exist). As ¬ entropy, as death=disorder of information limits the knowledge we might extract from systems in space (membranes that break its vital space into inner and outer forms), time (death and birth) and scale (loss of information past two scales). *It is remarkable then how in physics, the science in which ‘wrongly’ mankind has invested his future as a catalyst of the evolution of machines, has achieved through the use of renormalization processes precision in calculus of systems by adding ‘finitesimal’ parts of other scales that influence a larger whole (Wilson, Kondo, Feynman, virtual particle clouds).

**The 3 type of finitesimal calculus: single derivatives in space and time, double derivations.**

It is then obvious that calculus peers within the scales of the fifth dimension. Since Calculus studies functions of existence: it extracts finitesimals of space, time and scale, 1/x from a T.œ, integrating them in a longer path: *1/x ∆st*. Hence ¡ts capacity to reflect the laws of existential algebra.

Variations on those themes are many for 2 obvious reasons derived of the 2 principles of all 5D stiences:

– The existence due to absolute relativity of 5 dimotions: S=T-> St, Ts, TT, SS, ST, differentiated by internal and external motion=change or form. Thus *each dimotion in which change happens (St, Ts, TT, ST) require different processes of analysis, as we must consider what part of the entity remains constant and which one changes and hence we can apply derivation and integration. This is further complicated by the fact ‘motion and form sometimes’ cannot be distinguished, so instead of motion we see curvature (as in Einstein’s formalism). *

*– The existence of 3 possible types of change in scale, population of space and curvature=motion in time. *

*– The existence of scales, through which information increasingly disappears to the observer, to the point beyond the ∆±3 plane of ‘pixel perception’ by an ∆º self-centered T.œ information is scant, which makes difficult to integrate and derivate beyond the 2 ‘canonical scales’ («, ») in which death and emergent processes take place. So overwhelmingly all equations of calculus work on 2 scales (second derivatives, 2 ^{nd} integrals), or 3 dimensions of space (volumes). *

**The 2 kaleiodoscopic mirrors: Hamiltonians and Lagrangians.**

We can then with those absolute minimal notions of 5D calculus consider the Lagrangian as the search *for finitesimal actions=dimotions of physical systems, applied specifically to Ts-motions and TS-energy, hence approaching 0=0’.*

Hamiltonians and Lagrangians can be deduced from the equation of energy, Energy (ST) = Frequency of time x Lineal space.

Here is when we start to ‘fine tune’ the equivalence between the ‘real thing’ (Existential Algebra) and the human thing (Physical jargon). Energy has become a ‘jack of all trades’. So we distinguish Kinetic, eternal energy based in motion, similar to Ts-locomotion and potential energy based in form and position, similar to information, St; and we postulate immediately that the sum of both is balanced; that is St+Ts=ST; and so the next law of physics we extract easily is the ‘balance between St-potential energy and Ts-kinetic energy, from where we obtain the key equation of Hamiltonians (at the ∆º scale of energy) and Lagrangians at the ∆-1 scale of actions. That is, in the Hamiltonian, H= T(Ts:Kinetic)+V)(St: potential), gives us the total energy of the system, ST>0.

While the Lagrangian L=T-V shows its difference; and since in Lagrangians, the ‘action’ tends to zero; it means that in each ‘Stœp’ (stop and step) of form and motion, the outcome tends to zero: T(St)-V(Ts)=0; hence St=Ts.

The equation is profound. Essentially all systems of nature constantly switch between form and motion, and both together tend to be balanced every ‘cycle’ of space-time; which therefore becomes a zero sum.

Ultimately then a worldcycle is a zero sum, and can be expressed as the Lagrangian of Life plus death. But how long is the ‘action’? In the minimal, simplest stœps of physics it is a minimal quanta of time, but as time is ultimately a block of ‘variations’, virtual fluctuations that mix space and time, motion and form between birth and extinction, and each quanta of time is relative to the ‘speed of perception of it’ (so a slow mind will see a whole cycle of time as a form of space) we can consider that reality is an eternal present, as ultimately the system will be balanced into a zero sum.

Lagrange’s on the other hand is a complete different view, as it does not take the S=T geometric-temporal perspective but the principles of conservation of a physical organism St(angular momentum) < ST-energy>ts-lineal momentum. But all those principles ultimately derive from 5D metric. In the case of Newton>Poisson> Einstein, the vortex law, V(t) x R(s)=k, in any number of dimensions (3 in this case), the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, from the conservation of energy, S=T, as the balanced point of present of all systems that switch between motion (kinetic energy) and form (potential energy); reason why almost all systems of physics are SHM motions.

**– ST **or st is then balanced internal-external motion vs. form, or energy, of which there are two varieties we ad, Ts-kinetic energy akin to locomotion, (mv^{2}/2); where as you can observe the ‘motion’ provided by v is squared, so it is more important than the mass/form) and St-potential energy, where the energy is store internally in the different tensions and cyclical patterns of the system, but externally it is all position. Energy then is the balanced sum of both, St+Ts=ST and it is the essential law of physics that a system constantly balances both (SMH motions; Lagrangian actions which are its difference tending to zero (St-Ts=0, St=Ts). Existential energy is thus the mother of all battles, and we could state that in a ‘given plane of exist¡ence’, energy never dies, but constantly transforms between the informative, potential energy state and the kinetic, locomotion states.

Next it comes the fact that ultimately all are SHM, harmonic simple motions, which express in more detail that principle as a ‘spring’ fluctuates up and down, but when potential energy is maximal in the point of maximal distance, from the center of the spring motion and hence kinetic energy (mv) comes to zero back and forth.

It is all that simple, regardless of pedantry of scholars and Nobel Prizes, when you put the sun in the center, the orbits need no longer Ptolemaic epicycles but a simple ‘almost perfect’ circle… And indeed, because the basic equations of 5D are that simple, the fundamental first sight equations of physics will be that simple.

*In the next graph we see those differences when we apply the language of calculus*, which now we have understood better analysis in terms of s≈t motions*. *

We can see the *essential difference between both: A Lagrangian is a second order equation hence it peers lower in the process of change, to the finitesimal action=dimotion, which tends to zero as it is a finitesimal.*

*The Hamiltonian on the other hand doesn’t go down to the finitesimal action but stays in the level of energy.*

*But didn’t we say a second derivative peers two scales down? Yes, and no. As derivatives can extract in the same scale, finitesimals of motion (stœps), of curvature (S-form view of speed), most double derivatives just find a finitesimal of space=time in the same scale and one of scale, which is mostly an action, the naming of dimotions in physics. *

*So both formalisms can be considered the ∆-scalar perspective of motion (Lagrangian) vs. the S=T perspective of absolute relativity and the balance between potential and kinetic energy (Hamiltonian). And the fact we have both is yet another proof of the ‘two sides’ of the Universe, its ‘5D scales vs. its S=T absolute relativity principles’. Its application then will depend on what we focus on – the finitesimal actions=dimotions of a physical T.œ of its balances of existential energy.*

The Hamiltonian is *on the higher scale because* it has the macrocosmic element of mass, hence it considers the 3 elements of ∆º reality, scalar mass, spatial position/form, and temporal motion/speed.

The Lagrangian is simpler and wider in its application as it *escapes one of the 3 parameters of physical systems, ∆active magnitude (mass), q position in space and v, motion in time, the ∆element, which the Hamiltonian incorporates in its p-momenta, the present conserved value (1).*

*This introduces a NEW dimension of freedom in the Lagrangian, by lack of ‘information’ on the scalar parameter, reason why in (4) a Lagrangian has multiple trajectories. *

So *as the ∆-element is lost the Lagrangian must search for it by probing multiple paths in a space-time scale and also by going deeper=deriving twice the functions in its ∆-scales to search for the finitesimal action*. (3)

** **

**ST DIMOTIONS: EXISTENTIAL ENERGY & REPRODUCTION. CHIRALITY.**

**The metrics of 5D. And the basic equations derived of it. **

The 1^{st} step for building a sounder view of physics, departs from the simplest equations of mathematical physics – we can say as Descartes did in his ‘Discourse de la method’ where he left for future generations further developments of analytic geometry; that we leave for future AI or huminds the further developments of 5D physics and will stick to the basis; which require a lot of conceptual correction – indeed to start from scratch.

So we start from the mother of all battles, the function of existence that fusions 5D metrics and Absolute relativity, Max. SxT (s=t)=∆±¡, which puts together the metrics of 5D, $ (lineal space) x ð (cyclical time) = ∆st¡ and the principle of absolute relativity, S=T… **And Its development in 3±¡ ages:** Max. S x 0 T: Seed; Max. T x Min. S (youth), S=T (maturity) Max T x Min. S (3^{rd} Age), Max. T x 0 S (death)… to extract all other basic equations of physics, which correspond to the ‘ideal equations’ of a first course of physical sciences.

‘Those are the thoughts of God and the rest are details’ often born of the entangled connection between scales, of the imperfection of frictions and less efficient events and forms, of the entropy of dissolving structures…

As ultimately there is little to say of those complex ad ons but respect the mathematical apparatus of physicists that painstakingly have perfected so much their tools of measure – forgetting to explain what they measured.

Immediately a few basic equations of physics come out of that function of existence (S=T, Max. SxT, SxT=C:

The speed equation in cyclical terms, V=S/T becomes Vst= l($) x ƒ(ð); hence *an expression of 5D metrics.*

It is also the wave equation of present systems; the equation of ‘ST-energy’. And so the 1^{st} equation discovered in physics (albeit simplified into the lineal spacetime, V=s/t).

But energy which is a balance between Space=form and time=motion, by virtue of the principle of relativity that makes indistinguishable motion and form, hence all systems have both, S=T, can be written then as the existential energy of a system, which all organisms try to maximize, Max. S x T (s=t)… as two quantities S & T with a total value, ∆, maximize its product when S=T (5×5>6×4>9×1>10×0=0).

From this equation we obtain the evident fact that ‘all drop of ¥in=form has a drop of ¥æng=Kinetic energy. So form has a minimal motion, is in-form-ation form in action, St and motion has a bit of form, kinetic energy.

*Or else we get the two equations of death, T=0 x Max. S and S=0 x Max. T… *

So from it we can deduce the equation of energy, Energy (ST) = Frequency of time x Lineal space.

Next it comes the fact that ultimately all are SHM, harmonic simple motions, which express in more detail that principle as a ‘spring’ fluctuates up and down, but when potential energy is maximal in the point of maximal distance, from the center of the spring motion and hence kinetic energy (mv) comes to zero back and forth.

It is all that simple, regardless of pedantry of scholars and Nobel Prizes, when you put the sun in the center, the orbits need no longer Ptolemaic epicycles but a simple ‘almost perfect’ circle… And indeed, because the basic equations of 5D are that simple, the fundamental first sight equations of physics will be that simple.

Let us consider them in more detail, as we ‘study each of the scales of the Universe’.

First to notice that the Universe to be ‘immortal in time’, ‘infinite in space’ and ‘incommensurable’ in scale.

But why the equations of 5D metrics (speed, etc.) are a product of S and T while the equations of energy are a sum? This has to do with the ‘meaning’ of the 5 operands of Algebra, each one related to a certain dimotion and with the 3 ‘relative scales’ of reality. Actions are the minimal dimotions happening in a single quanta of time. So each minimal ‘action=dimotion=dimensional motion=Step and stop=Stœp must be integrated into a long path, and that is the ‘frequency’ that multiplies the dimotion.

In the case of energy* we are working NOT with the SxT=K but with the S=T *2^{nd} most important equation of 5D. Hence we call S=form=potential energy and T=motion=Kinetic energy, and the signs are the ± ones.

All in all, the Universe will conserve the total potential and kinetic energy in all its manifestations even if in its ‘maximal points’, they are redundant. But those maximal points of Ss=Maximal potential energy plus zero kinetic motion and vice versa, are really the ‘limits’ of existence of the system. I.e. if we stretch a spring beyond those limits it will likely deform and loose its capacity to return back, being damaged. And so we return to the ever pervading warnings that a pure Ss and pure Tt (mind and entropy, language and pure motion) are NOT living states, but ‘seeds’ and ‘time motions reservoir’ for the games to begin. Immortal both but truly not living; in one of the many philosophical contradictions of 5D.

Now the reader will be surprised that those few concepts and equations (lagrangians, Hamiltonians, balance equations, Laws of ‘balance’ are enough to understand all the laws of science, which are ‘its details.

But they require a conceptual understanding of the wrong principles of physics, notably the concepts of entropy and the principles of minimum potential energy that bring most physical systems to the points* of rest but only because they are part of a larger system that preys on it. *

Consider the familiar example of a marble on the edge of a bowl. If we consider the marble and bowl to be an isolated system, then when the marble drops, the potential energy will be converted to the kinetic energy of motion of the marble. Frictional forces will convert this kinetic energy to heat, and at equilibrium, the marble will be at rest at the bottom of the bowl, and the marble and the bowl will be at a slightly higher temperature. The total energy of the marble-bowl system will be unchanged. What was previously the potential energy of the marble, will now reside in the increased heat energy of the marble-bowl system. This will be an application of the maximum entropy principle as set forth in the principle of minimum potential energy, since due to the heating effects, the entropy has increased to the maximum value possible given the fixed energy of the system.

In 5D first this is a case of thermodynamic transfer of energy from the ∆º to the ∆-1 scale: ∆º (ball form)<∆-1 (thermal energy that is used by the molecules of the system) and also symmetrically an St<Ts<Tt equation ‘allowed’ of transfer of St-potential energy into Ts-locomotion & friction that becomes Tt-entropy. So the question here is ‘friction’. The fact that there is a contact, a ‘perpendicular’ 4^{th} postulate of Non-æ geometry, NOT a parallel motion subtly guided by the information transferred between the two points but a form of ‘collision’ in a disordered state, propitiated by the gravitational force. Alas, entropy is ‘sTupid’ and chaotic and arises ALWAYS when there is no information, Ss<St minds controlling the process.

In biology we find the same concept in a ‘herd’ of any animals even a flock of birds or a school of fishes that do NOT collide because information is shared to maintain them in ‘parallel’, which according to the 4^{th} Postulate of congruency implies a ‘superfluid motion’ with no entropy. Because physicists deny the Ss<St arrows of the Universe due to humind’s egocy (ego=idiocy) that reserves those properties only to humind’s non-Euclidean points BY DECREE, they will always consider ONLY Tt-friction cases, never mind superfluidity, black holes, bosons, superconductivity, negative zero K beta temperatures, etc. etc.

Temperature let us remind the reader is a measure of ‘entropy’, NOT of order, of kinetic energy but also of entropic collisions (as we measure it when molecules collide with our thermometers).

Egocy however is natural to the equation of the mind 0’ x ∞ = C, and nothing can be done about it. It is the same with biology. Plants are not intelligent, but they react with intelligence in so many ways (see paper Biology, from atoms to plants) showing both memory and learning to act (so if we put a plant near a pole to crawl up and remove it when the plant sends its roots and do it a few times, the plant learns and anticipates to move in the ‘future direction’ we will move the pole as an animal does), because A BRAIN is just a network and roots ARE the brain of plants that hold a mental image as your brain does.

A brain needs only two components, a network, which receives input and ‘breaks it down’ in a network of neurons, roots, neural networks, and a ‘transversal’ spatial, formal, memorial second network that connects in perpendicular symbiosis those time networks to hold a memorial image of the outer events.

But egocy will have his punishment, as it is what the Universe most hate, including those of us entangled to its mind. So I won’t try to appease the ego. Physical minds EXIST and control entropy like all minds do; however entropy=thermal energy also exists and the arrow of social evolution upwards, of complex wholes created by superfluid networks is destroyed and balanced by the arrow of entropy. So the balances we observe in a single plane through Lagrangians, St=Ts are by the symmetry of ∆≈S≈T≈@≈¬

So we find then also the balance between ‘entropy’ ˙∆+1<∆-1’ and social evolution, ∆-1>∆+1. This is the ‘Lagrangian’ so to speak of Scalar physics (and any other stience).

In space then we find a ‘topological equation’ of balance, |x O = ø, whereas hyperbolic waves in reproductive motion balance |-fields in the ∆-1 herd state and O+1, the head-particle. So the wave is the ‘present’ state, and in time we find the equation of balance Past (lineal entropy) x Future (cyclical form) = Present, iterative state.

So ultimately means that ‘all systems’ try to collapse and maximize the present, the wave state, the reproductive female form; or alternatively if we express it in terms of lagrangians, minimize the difference between the two states, move in stops and steps, S≈T… But those equalities are very rich in meanings because they are asymmetric and hence creative. S is NOT, it is a feed-back ó equation, not an absolute equality. So when both combine they create ‘something else’… the line and the cycle form a hyperbolic wave, the whole Ss-mind and the parts of Tt-entropy with faster motion form an organism and in between there is the ‘network branching’ to reach from the whole (brain, heart, cpu) to the parts. This is important to keep always in mind… Those laws of Non-AElgebra and Non-E geometry matter. 0’-finitesimals also matter. An absolute zero does NOT exist or else S=T will be an absolute indistinguishable truth, which is not, and the Lagrangian will be an absolute zero which is not. An action tends to zero but never becomes zero. If zero existed NOTHING would be. Singularities in big-bangs do NOT exist either. All this might sound confusing but as I re-organize those texts, a line of thought brings us slowly from 5D to the description of space and time and its combinations.

How complexity then arises? The answer is because there are 5 combinations of Dimensions of space and time motions and trust me, that gives us enough complexity and then there is the whole range of effects and transitions between scales, and as systems can ‘jump’ through several scales that ‘become blind to perception’ nested Universes exist, and those nested Universes have inner smaller parts, and languages differentiate… Things really get complex and as the ‘pure ideal physical entities’ are entangled in larger worlds and made of smaller parts, and all kind of entropic frictions and virtual particles, make things ever more ‘turbulent’ so physics gets more and more complex.

We though will leave the work on building up those complexities to the next 5D generation as Descartes did with his Geometrie (:

So the next element to define is the scalar element; that is to classify, which full T.œs (ab. Timespace Supœrganism) exist in physics, and the equivalence between the constants of physics which are ratios between its S and t elements, often represent the value of a dimotion (hence in the form of a product); and the components of organisms (often defined in terms of sums and superpositions)

And for that we have experimental physics. But let us be aware of the nested structure of those superorganisms and its ‘blind’ capacity to jump between scales, so the Galaxy in its ∆±4 gravitational structure really ignores the electronic world, as it is ultimately a quark game; while the world of man, ∆±3 superorganisms.

So it is best for clarity to study independently those supœrganisms as chains of scales to identify then their properties and then mix them together.

We have thus first the ∆±3 humind’s world, with a clear scalar structure of parts of wholes:

∑∑∑∑∆-4: Planckton > ∑∑∑∆-3: photons ≈ ∑∑∆-2: electrons≈ ∑-1 molecules ≈ ∆º: matter

And the world of quarks in its growing scales:

∑∑∑∆-3: Gluons ≈ ∑∑∑∆-2 ud-quarks ≈mesons≈ ∑∑∆-1: BCT quarks ≈ ∑º: black hole minds…

Such chains happen for different species of the physical Universe and so we can study each one and find for each of them its 3 ‘parts’ and 5 ‘dimotions’ and 3 ‘scales’ and the 0’-point that acts as the ‘knot’ of flows of St-information where its mind will reside (the center of the black hole, likely a top quark boson state, the crystal center, with its mind-image, etc.

This kind of description though does not address the translation that obsesses physicists – that of the Ts-locomotion laws of physics and its energy laws that are useful for the praxis of huminds. So we will intersect novel 5D analysis of supœrganisms of physics and translation of the 4D laws of physics, bearing in mind they are NOT that important, regardless of the obsession of physicists with them.

The complexity of those systems is extraordinary, conceded, and the work of physicists describing it to the detail remarkable. But we are interested for the whys Feynman said never matter to a physicist. This is absurd, a dogma, a limit to maintain the egocy of humind – the affirmation, only what we measure matters… It is like not caring to know what an elephant is, just measuring and filling volumes about its quantitative sizes…

So rather than expanding the already excessive field of mathematical measure, we are doing mostly interpretations of the meanings of those measures – as that field is the realm of ‘experts’ and they have done good enough. Let us then number the organisms and its 3 parts and then its 5 dimotions.

∆±4 scale. We cannot perceive it, so the largest doll that encloses galaxies lacks certainty. Still we might hint that the minimal form of maximal speed, Tt, is the neutrino at v>c and the max. form of minimal speed the scalar Higgs boson.

**Existential energies in galatoms: the 3 conserved quantities of physics and 3 parts of the fractal point.**

Let us then see the equivalence of the 3±¡ parts of a fractal point with the 3 main elements conserved in physics:

The 3 conserved quantities of physical systems are the 3 elements, St ó Ts = TS (dynamic view) or St x ts=TS (entangled view) of the 5D metric function of the 3 physical scales within the galaxy.

The largest of those metric equations is, h(St) x c(Ts)=ST±3, which sets the limits of information (h-spin) and motion (C-speed) of anything that exists within the galatom *and it is perceivable (outside of it, there is the larger nested ∆±4 Universe of gravitation, not perc*eivable).

Within those limits, all are relative ‘nested scales, *hence moving and informing on lesser motion/form*; scales which diminish as *we reduce the ±¡ limits of the ‘constant, scalar Space-time between them’ in decametric scales. *

*So if the galaxy stretches to the limits of h and c, those limits are the ‘dead’ limits for smaller entities within it and become its ‘Ss and Tt’ still and entropic barriers. But the balanced regions in which the next ∆±3 species exist are below those scales. So we find in the ‘light world’ series; *∑∑∑∆-3: photons ≈ ∑∑∆-2: electrons≈ ∑-1 molecules; an average decametric reduction of speeds: a photon moves at 300.000 km/sec the Bohr orbit of an electron runs at 30.000 km/sec and the mean speed of a hydrogen gas molecule is 3.000 km. sec. It follows that in the other range, past light-speed we should find for ‘gravitons?≈neutrinos?’ outside the galaxy moving between them at 10 C= Z a very common range of ‘expansion of spacetime’ between galaxies; and even beyond it seems there is a 100 C wall of fire, for a hypothetical hyper-universe… though 5D is not fond of speculating beyond the galaxy scale. This also means that in the range of ðƒ, cyclical time, speeds must range from the likely ð=c speed of the spin of ‘light particles’ (the U-D quark and electron), down in speeds – obvious for the electron in its Bohr radius which is a ð-speed, etc. All that numerical crunching work though will be avoided in this introductory courses for future generations of AI or Huminds who love so much measure to make them.

*We try here to straighten concepts. *

It is then obvious that as we travel through those physical scales, the constant parameter of time (frequency or duration of a cycle), and constant of entropic motions, change, but *by virtue of 5D metrics, they must be harmonic in their product; and for that reason the* 3 main constants of our light scale of space-time, h-spin, Down quark mass and k-Boltzmann’s molecular activity which processes the actions of physical systems are all related (E=Hƒ=KnT=Mc^{2}).

Entropic motion x Cyclical time frequency=information give us then a range of ‘existential energies’ within the two limiting barriers.

*But there are more limiting barriers within those 3 co-existing scales of galatoms, as one constant transforms into other; since Energy is conserved but information *dissolve *when crossing those barriers *becoming disordered by death and reshaped afresh in a new scale.

So the frequency of a quantum wave or its collapse into an ∆+1 particle with a synchronous internal clock (Broglie’s realist picture), emerges from the ‘undistinguishable’ lower electronic plane to become molecular speed, which again emerges as ‘temperature’ of a macroscopic matter state.

This implies a finite limit in each plane for the parameters that measure T and S, departing from those first universal constant of informative space (H-spins and temporal motion c-speeds), and its social wave frequencies. The scales though follow 5D metrics so both lineal and cyclical time speeds accelerate when we become smaller reason why the transition between ∆-1 frequency in time and temperature is on the smaller limit. I.e. beyond 10.000 degrees molecules become disordered as atoms become plasma and temperature leaves way to frequency; and vice versa, beyond certain frequency waves in quantum systems collapse into smaller particles; and beyond certain mass ’frequency’ (E=hƒ=Mc2->M=h/c2 ƒ = ‘k’ƒ) light quarks collapse into heavy quarks and black holes. Asymptotic transitions between scales are thus fundamental to physics, from Lorentz transformations to Curie temperatures to the formation of quantum vortices, quasiparticles, etc. but all of them respond to those 5D laws of transition we shall just sketch.

It is the 5D metric exact for all the species of the Universe? Not at all, because it is based in deep thought, on the fact that larger forms have more ‘scales of complexity’ that must be built above the lower scales through networks that synchronize in simultaneity the parts into the wholes. So each family of species deploy a different efficiency in those build ups and so as efficiency in the process of information increases for smaller species, the ‘phyla’ of smallish beings form more efficient families that ‘displace’ the lineal equation of its metabolic rates of processing existential energy to the left, as the graph of the life families show: unicellular species are more efficient than insects more efficient than mammals in the 3 scales of size of life.

This law can be generalized to any ‘trinity’ scale of systems of any stience: the 3 families of mass of the galaxy, the 3 constants of action of its scales (h, K, M), etc. Ultimately it is a law ‘entangled’ to the true meaning of entropy, which increases as a system becomes more complex in scales, as the smaller parts do NOT want to loose its freedom to the larger networks and so there is always some ‘heat-waste existential energy’ in larger wholes. So the single-cell organism is more efficient than the colder one, more efficient than the mammal largest being.

Though a careful analysis is required for each of them, as the ‘universe is simple but not that simpler’ and only conceptual lucidity on 5D laws allows to properly interpret those details (which makes almost impossible for modern huminds, reduced to mathematical automaton science to become 5D scientists – in the few STages of my life I tried to have a disciple, smoke came out of their brains 🙂

It is also my fault, as an autist researcher and one of the reasons I am writing those papers is to painstakingly try before my myelin disappears to make sense of it by rewriting once and again those 30 papers.

Because of those gaps, those transitions require either the ‘emission’ or the ‘absorption’ by the system of larger amounts of existential energy to enter a new family of species. And thus a huge amount of mathematical physics goes on to describe those processes of expulsion of ‘fields of energy’ (i.e. Meissner effect) or in taking of energy (i.e. endogen reactions).

So near the limits of each nested dual plane, ∆±¡ by an excess or lack of energy or information, the system ‘decays or evolves and emerges into a higher ‘constant’ of an upper or lower plane, crossing a discontinuity that doesn’t conserve the in/form/ation between planes; which huminds deny because they would like to be immortal and the ‘death=entropic’ transition between huminds and Gods (studied in the paper ‘history and minds’) does not grant survival in the same form. I.e. a god is the verbal emergence of a mind. But if 5D becomes the collective subconscious of science, only egocy will make me think 5D is ‘L§’ mind’ becoming immortal as a new subconscious collective wor(l)d.

**The construction of physical superorganisms in space.**

A physical supœrganism is as all other system made of an St<ST>Ts adjacent topologic ensemble. Those 3 elements are equivalent to the 3 conserved timespace topologies =dimensional motions of classic physics:

**1D S<T: Lineal Locomotions***,* **(Ab. |; $T, Ts),** the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, is *a *lineal locomotion, performed by a limb/field system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points…

**2D T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. O; §ð, St):** a 2D cyclical or 3D spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

**3D S≈T:** **Fields of Existential Energy (Ab. Ø, ST, ∆¡):** a hyperbolic body-wave that iterates the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them. Thus Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D and so when we add the 3 parts we write, 1D lineal motion + 2 D cyclical motion=3D hyperbolic vital space. This again is the simplest ‘flat’ geometry that gets more complex for 3D space-time volumes. It would be in topology the open ball, while the angular momentum is the membrane and the lineal locomotion the point with parts or singularity that guides the motion without moving (center of masses), treated as a point-particle.

So *conservation laws define the 3 quantities conserved, which in space appear as the 3 components of all ‘particles’ and ‘physical waves’ and in time as: Lineal x Cyclical momentum = Present energy.*

In graph we see most of the being is its vital space, or open ball or body-wave that stores almost all the energy, as the singularity appears as a point-particle, often invisible, and the angular momentum measures only the thin crust-membrane of the being, easily confused with the first layer of the vital energy. So if we take the ‘seed’ and peel the ‘skin’ of the tomato, we eat the pulp that has all its energy, and indeed we do so with fruits. What is stored then in the membrane and singularity put together or ‘membrain’ is the sensorial and processing units of information. So another way to break down the thing is in 1+2 (singularity and membrane or ‘membrain) which are the informative, intelligent S@ parts that command (connected often through invaginated networks) the vital space of energy and its cycles and ‘cellular parts’. (S=T analysis uses ± operand, SxT=C 5D metric entangles the parts and re=produces scalar units, using the product, see ‘existential algebra: 5D maths and scale.)

The mathematics of it, require some subtle conceptual analysis we reserve for the last papers we shall complete ‘5D maths and time=calculus’ and ‘5D physics and mind’.

So when we put together those 3 elements into an ‘organic whole’ as in the right graph above, it is easy to see, they form a structure with a central active magnitude that commands the lineal motion of the system (Center of mass or charge), a clock-like membrane of cyclical motion, and a vital energy enclosed between both, which we can measure by its radius-width.

The 3 parts of any organism define also its mathematical unit, the fractal Non-Euclidean point with breath, as it fits multiple parallels, when we come closer to it and when we enlarge its perception at the proper scale of the fifth dimension in which it maximizes its existence, grows in size to be a full blown, 3- 4-5D entity*;* depending on detail. As the full scalar view adds to the 3 canonical dimensions of space in a single plane of reality, now gifted with motion, hence ‘dimensional motions’ or dimotions; the fractal structure of the Universe in scales, which means to add two new dimensions. The canonical dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) of entropic dissolution and death proper of classic physics – arrow of time, and the inverse dimensional motion of parts that become wholes, of social evolution, of growth of information, as those parts emerge into a whole. We shall call this Dimotion, the most important of the Universe, the dimotion of social evolution, of love. As all languages, mirrors of reality not only mathematics reflect the 3±¡ Topological Dimotions that make all its organic systems – the 3 ‘dimotions’ or topological varieties we observe in a single plane, which shape its organs – simplified in Euclidean mathematics, into height, the dimension of information (so all formal minds are on top of the system from heads to antennae, to particles in waves – photons, quantum realism); length, the dimension of locomotion, so faster systems are ‘lines’, planes and TGVs and light rays, and the dimension of iteration, reproduction; so body-waves have a width dimension.

Particle points are just the Euclidean view of a Non-E species from a much larger ∆+3 scale that converts the supœrganism in a finitesimal point (as ∆-4 T.œs – ab. Timespace Supœrganism, are not perceivable though the ∆+4 entity might use them as Tt-entropic motion; reason why ultimately we no longer perceive it, we kill them).

**THE VITAL CONSTANTS : METABOLIC RATES OF THE 3 MAIN SCALES OF PHYSICS.**

A good guide to the whole amazing variety of physical species, its ternary parts in space, 5 dimotions in time, 3 ages in its worldcycles, between its limits of entropy and stillness is to consider in which topological form and hence time age and relative ∆±1 scale they are by analyzing its equations.

For example, in mechanics 3 concepts are all pervading; ‘energy’, ‘momentum’ and ‘force’. In the mechanical scale, best perceived their formulae are, ½ mv^{2}, mv and ma. As mv is the derivative of energy respect to speed, and a derivative is a finitesimal part of a whole in scale (minimal part), time (instant) or space (curvature) – see 5D and calculus, a quanta of momentum, is a minimal ∆-1 ‘action’ spent from the ‘pool’ of Existential energy of the being. *Thus if Energy is the present ∆º ST-ate of the being; *

On the other hand, a force, ma differs in the v constant speed vs. the a-ccelerated speed, or ‘vortex law’, VxR=K, proper of shrinking St-vortices. This acceleration of the frequency of a vortex thus ‘consumes the total time of the system ‘faster’. So forces spend the energy of the system faster and most systems try to act just ‘easy’ in the harmonic parallel ‘Energy and momentum’ ∆º and ∆-1 scales of the existential being; reason why those are the conserved elements of physics and forces are NOT conserved. Forces then are ‘accelerated’ F=ma extra-expenditure that put our existential energy/momentum out of balance because they transfer this existential momentum to other entity either in a symbiotic or predatory relationship (defined by the 4^{th} non-E postulate of congruence according to similarity).

A force must be applied for any transfer between 2 T.œs. This can be done in the same ∆º plane of existence only by direct contact through adjacent topology, pegging to each other or, when there is a gap in the ∆º scale, by a process of translation of the force to the ∆-1 more extended limb/field system which will create a wave below the ∆º particle scale to transfer the force that will act on the other ∆º particle and transfer the existential momentum.

*Those universal disomorphic concepts apply to all scales. So we can *do a homologic comparison with the previous graph of a biological metabolic rate (we avoid comparisons with memetic social organisms, because that is too far out even for the more detached human being – a bottom line for its emotional programming but could do them as well). In the graph we see above the SxT=C existential metric of the family of mammals, which becomes a lineal function.

Below though we see the equal number of existential beats, the ∆-1 quanta of its total energy; each beat thus is a beat of existential momentum in a biological being. And as we see, the entire phyla has the same number of beats of existential momentum, which not surprisingly is similar to the number of beats of most organisms of any kind, physical, biological or sociological, with subtle variations proper of a more advanced course on ‘Existential algebra’ not even attempted here. This magic number interval 9-11^{9-11} based in decametric scales is also the commonest T=S symmetry for efficient supœrganisms (mammals are the most efficient animal), so it is the number of ties in DNA, mean stars of a galaxy, mean cells of an organism, present carry capacity of humans close to our entropic extinction by AI robotic weapons.

We can consider with this prolegomena the symmetry of those spatial forms also in 3 main physical scales, though the ternary, fractal principle means that each of those scales can be broken down into 3 more, so in fact a thorough description would deal with 9 sub-scales, including those not normally treated as fundamental in some cases not even considered as forces – the ‘exchange interaction’ that shares electrons and it is in fact the true force of molecules; the magnetic scale that surrounds charges, etc. *Moreover as each entity might be perceived in each of its 3 ages, or measured only in one of its ∆-1 smallish actions=dimotions; or vice versa, as a partial ‘dimotion or part of a larger supœrganism, things get more complicated. *

Let us keep it simple with the 3 key scales, where the previous disquisitions on the scales that we can be most sure of understanding right by sheer evidence and the humanist method (in a disomorphic universe, man in mind and life in action are the examples best understood to carry into other systems).

**Pentalogic on the metabolic rates of physical species: h, k, c.**

The 1^{st} question to resolve in the organic paradigm is the organic role of the 3 main constants of physics, which in 5D we call a ‘Planckton’, a ‘Boltz’ and… a mass… which in the human world is only one, that of the Nucleon (Neutron) from which it breaks down into the u+e ‘gender duality’ of the ‘primeval’ H-atom; as the masses of the higher particles *belong to the next cosmological scales of ‘frozen stars’, pulsars and black holes. So regardless of ‘standard models’ are relatively irrelevant to this world. *

What is the meaning of those 3 most important Universal constant of quantum physics, from an organic point of view? The simplest answer is the reason we introduced its analogies with the biological world, as they concern the *metabolic rates of the 3 scales of physical reality*. Indeed, the 3 formulae of Energy in each scale we shall discuss in depth in this paragraph E=∆+1: Mc^{2}=∆-1:hƒ=∆º: nkT, are similar to those of metabolic rate, (energy consumption for time); and so roughly speaking concern the metabolic rate of the electronic species (E=hƒ), quark-mass species (E=mc^{2}) and molecular species (nkT). Since **Metabolic rate** is the **rate** of **metabolism**, the amount of energy used by an animal per unit of time. If we reduce it to the amount used for each animal in terms of its weight, as it turns out, those rates obey 5D metrics. That is smaller animals *have faster cycles and higher consumption, which is expressed in the speed* of its heart beats. So we could also talk of those metabolic rates as the speed of its 5D metrics, related to ð=ƒ. It follows that the ‘energy’ consumption (and storage), of smaller systems, are much higher, reason why smaller scales have more density of ‘existential energy’, which atomic bombs, etc. expel.

But as in the pentalogic Universe nothing is a single ‘thing’; that is all is entangled and all systems act performing the 5 dimotions/ elements of S-pace, T-ime, ST-scalar energy, Ts-locomotion & St-information, we need to make a pentalogic analysis of the 3 concepts and elaborate a full complex ‘structure’ to put in relationships all those elements (frequencies, given by the ƒ, T, m element), metabolic rate or ‘beat’ given by h, k, c and *the different ‘supœrganisms’ of physics (photons, quarks, electrons, its composite atoms, its social groupings, molecules, electric flows, surrounded by magnetic fields to form, supœrganisms of electromagnetic forces, and then jump into the cosmological, gravitational realm, starting with simple masses.*

As this is the task to take on 2020 (2019 was for the papers on history, economics and the Universe), along the completion of the papers on 5D biology and calculus, and those are by far the more extensive sciences, it will take time to patch together all my partial analysis and give it an order and clean up humind’s errors.

**The distorsion of symmetric view (Non-Euclidean, Lobachevski’s factor)**

It is worth to notice they are measured with different parameters. But this is largely due to the ‘Lobachevksi’s factor that makes us to perceive with different geometries ∆-planes and distances. So the Earth is flat from our perspective (larger system) but curved from a distant or larger perspective. So upper planes of 5D are flat; smaller or far away ones are curved and those of our size have more detail, hence they are hyperbolic, more complex. On the other extreme, c-speed is a constant of the galaxy and as such is larger, flat. But if we *could look at a galaxy from above, we would see c-speed turning in the horizon of the central black hole and could consider it a form of angular momentum; a curved form.*

Then there is the need to apply to all of those factors a trilogic analysis of scale, topologic analysis in space, and temporal and social analysis. The world of physics is deceptively simple at 1^{st} sight but those supœrganisms in detail get ever more complex despite the pretension of physicists to reduce it to clean-cut equations.

Consider the homology of the metabolic rate of mammals in the graph, as a supœrganism that as almost all those of the ‘biggest’ nested island-Universe the galaxy, interplays the 3 scale: Thus at the ∆+1-scale the factor is related to mass (graph); but then the true ‘unit’ of metabolism happens at ∆-1 atomic-quantum scale, since the ‘currency unit’ for most life species is the ATP-ADP molecule studied in our paper on Biology, but then there is the ‘input’ of temperature established by the ∆+1 Earth’s radiation (cold species) or the blood system (hot species), and so we find once more a symmetry between the ∆±¡ scales, since in fact, an organism spends an equal quantity to his ∆+1 ‘mass-weight’ in ATP (if you weight 80 kilos you burn 80 kilos of ATP each Earth’s rotary day). So the laws of synchronicity studied in depth in our papers on time and the Universe, relate all those scales and ‘relative times’.

Moreover the metabolic ‘ATP rate’ can be considered as all those ratio/constants in terms of an Energy x Time parameter, as those abstract graphs do*, but it also could be done ‘counting ATPs’, which are ‘real molecules’, hence bundles of cyclical motions. In the same manner h-Planck can be seen as a ratio, but actually there are cyclical motions called spins, which have the same ‘h’ *value parameter.

So what is the ‘central’ pentalogic view for ATP? As a rule the ST-Energy-present-beauty-balanced state of a system is its most important definition. And so we can talk of ATP and metabolism as a Spatial form (Molecule), in 3 different scales, etc. but the ultimate definition would be ‘the unit of energy’ of the organism (which is somehow the commonest expression about it as the ‘currency of the organism’, since indeed money is the ‘reproductive energy of an economy’ – see papers on Earth III on money).

But for an external macroscopic, star-size observer unaware of the existence of a microscopic human being as an organism in itself, who has only a ‘detector only for ATP’, (remember we do NOT see from the ∆±3, 4 planes all the information), every element of the human organism in its actions will be connected to ATP but he can get to the conclusion your mass is indeed 80 kilos if it just measures ATP through the time-day cycle even if he never weights you. In the quantum and galactic scale the difficulty to discern different types of information introduce those problems but obviously the star-like observer wouldn’t have none of it if a philosopher of science puts forward that argument about a possible supœrganism of humans – ‘there is only an ATP energy molecule in herds with some ‘constant regularities’ he would argue… as the ‘constant of ATP’ as the h, k, m constants appear everywhere.

This leads to the very essence of why physics is NOT an organic stience. Physicists use only abstract parameters even if they talk of real, cyclical bundles of motions in synchronicity, which is the definition of a T.œ in time. They have then by virtue of their jargon ‘strip off’ any chance to explain organically matter and the growing of complexity of its mathematical analysis of all the ‘details’ and ‘entanglements’ of those organisms with its parts, its wholes, the other elements they communicate with, its dimotions, vital constants, etc. make it very difficult to express in terms of ‘real organisms’ as we shall attempt here (reason why we try to keep maths to the minimum).

For all those reasons if we were to be exhaustive we need to do a trilogic analysis in scale, topology and time ages and pentalogic of dimotions for every element ‘trying to discern’ its multiple complex roles and *then add the equations to each of those roles as spacetime organisms. *This is the original intention of those texts but I might not complete it; so whatever I have time to do, pretends to be a guide to future 5D researchers if ever physicists abandon its idol-ogy of ‘measure only’ for ‘mechanical technology’ only. Let us then do those pentalogic analysis first of those 3 constants, mass, planckton and Boltzs.

Obviously those quanta of energy can then multiply so a wave of a photon that grows in amplitude=energy and intensity=frequency might have many h-units, and even vary them as organisms do with its metabolic rate through its existential function of 3 ages (variation on amplitude and frequency of a wave that ages as it red-shifts.

** The 3 physical scales. Its metabolic rates. **

The ‘galatom’ dual ∆±4,3 is an immortal scale – the perfect form as protons are immortal in its infinite cyclical generations and so are Galaxies, as they transit between the two nucleon states through its double beta decays. And it would be tempting to draw the same picture for the intermediate scale of thermal energy, of molecular matter and give the same meaning to the K-Boltzmann constant as the metabolic ratio of molecular matter.

However it is evident that the ‘variability’ of the thermal scale is much higher than that of the galatom.

As a metabolic rate changers in phyla of animal species it does for the different families of molecular life, smaller for the lineal entropic gaseous states (2/3 kT) and higher for more complex states (diatomic and tri-atomic molecules) and even higher for the liquid and solid crystal families, despite its seemingly lower kinetic energy as *its existential energy transforms into internal potential energy, which paradoxically by virtue of 5D metrics (faster motions in time = more degrees of freedom in space), increases in smaller ensembles*.

In the next cosmological scale, we consider the same concept for the 3 families of masses, where M gives us the frequency of acceleration of a given mass family as a vortex of time, faster the smaller its size is. So the frequency beats of S and BCT strangelets and top black holes are far superior to those of UD-light quarks.

In the graph E is the existential energy, different for each scale and within each scale for each state and social form, according to the different values of the ‘St’ and “Ts’ parameters that give us the existential energy of the system. It is then important to realize that the 3 elements are in constant feed-back fluctuation between two different states: Existential energy (E) might be considered ‘Entropic motion’ as in E=Mc^{2} if it is measured in a predatory form, in which the SxT elements loose its structure.

While on the other hand the Ts (m, T, v) and St (h, k, c) elements can be transformed into each other: StóTs, as in the case of speed on the ‘limit’ of c-speed for light spacetime supœrganisms (Galaxies).

m, or the fractional value attached to K or the social frequency of a group of photons that give us a color; till so many social photons with growing existential energy finally ‘collapse’ into a ∆+1 particle.

In graph we see those co-invariant 5D constants for the 3 main physical planes as a representation of its conserved existential energy, which the reader will observe is always equal to the product of a constant of vital space and a ‘clock of time frequency’ (temperature, frequency mass, where mass is a frequency of an accelerated vortex of space-time, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence; e=mc^{2}+e=hƒ -> m = ƒ (h/c^{2}).

Each 5D physical scale has a constant ratio between its ‘frequency=time parameters’ and entropic, energetic ones, which give the 3 fundamental constants of Scales in the Galaxy organism, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of Kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume: entropic content of its orbital sphere).

While the other 2 dimotions of evolution of parts into whole ‘upwards’, (ab. ∆+1, Ss) and the dimotion of dissolution of wholes into networks or entropy, (ab. ∆-1, Tt) are also topological dimotions. Since in fact modern topology considers its ‘varieties of form’, networks of points, which are defined by its ‘adjacency’ and proximity. So truly the world is made of topological organisms

In the graph we see what we mean. In the 3 scales of physical systems what humans call energy is Tt, *pure time after through an entropic process of growth of disorder, the quanta of space populations of those scales, H-plancktons, K-Boltzs and C ^{2} squares of light multiplied by its ‘frequency of populations’, have become erased into a ‘soup of energy-motions’, an entity of a higher ∆+1 scale uses for motion – electrons that absorb h-photons in e=hv (photoelectric effect from where Einstein deduced the equation); waves of heat humans use to power mechanical objects in ∆+1 and radiation humans extract from the conversion of mass into energy. *

So the equations are obvious, and its equivalence also because the outcome is pure timeless time, time=motion with no form, then reformed by the electron, the mechanical object or the nuclear reactor into energy of work, which however is something else, no longer Tt but ts.

And so only in the state of Tt all of them are comparable, but by no means identical. Mass is NOT energy but can be measured after we ‘blow it out of all its information into energy. And because as we said, a dying mass goes ½ up as information and ½ down as motion in our lower mechanical scale, in fact E=mc^{2} is halved into mv^{2}/c when c^{2} becomes kinetic energy. All this becomes increasingly complex as the equations of physics that depart from those get increasingly complicated, so we can only attempt to make precise conceptualizations in the papers of mathematical physics when we write/post them. So far here we can just make some disordered insights on those equations trying to get you the ‘feeling’ of what is really going on – transformations that kill systems and extract a partial part of its content as entropic energy for humans to develop its work=reproduce things by imprinting the extracted motion with its mental forms.

On the other side though we always have two parameters, the ‘quanta of action’ or family of entities of the system, h, k, c^{2}, which are bidimensional constant 5D metric St, sT, ST entities of those 3 scales, multiplied by a population that by virtue of the Si=Te equivalence humans measure as a time frequency for faster ∆-1 scales (quantum entities are seen so fast that are perceived as time worldcycles) and as solid form (mass) for larger ones. Each of those st constants and ƒ(ð) frequencies of populations are thus measure with different concepts as humans see each scale with distorted tools of measure. For example h is measured as angular momentum, St, k as entropy, sT, (which as von Neumann said to Shannon nobody understands) and c as speed, S(l)ð(ƒ); because the mind distorts the geometry of smaller scales as faster closed time cycles, the geometry of larger scales as lineal (so the earth seems flat not curved) and our intermediate scale provides us with thermal energy, so we ‘predate’ molecular heat into entropy.

Yet in the objective view of Universal physics, for each fundamental scale, there is just a constant of action multiplied by a ‘frequency of timespace population’ that is converted into entropic energy of pure time-motion that feeds in its equalized Tt form human thirst for a source of motion. So we kill the three fundamental vital constants=T.œs of Nature, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and C^{2} to feed our mechanisms and organisms.

Those Universal constants of reality are complex T.œs, combination of T and S, balanced by 3 5D Sub-Metric vital constants of a any system: S/T= Speed of Locomotion, which defines the limbs/fields of the system, SxT=Existential Momentum/force, which defines its body and T/S: Density of information, which defines its mental power, all maximized when Si=Te.

But the terminology of humind’s physics is ambivalent in its concepts and so it requires when dealing with each specific case on papers on physics, an in depth consideration. Some elements of that rewriting are:

– Time can be measured in ∆+1 with Duration, sum of ∆-1 frequency steps, a better measure. This distinction is not made and since t=1/ƒ(ð), confusions arise on those 3 ‘generic S/T, SxT and T/S’ vital constants.

We cannot deal in depth with all those equations, which we shall do in our 2^{nd} paper on ‘human physics’ focused in thermodynamics, mechanics and the translation of mathematical physics. To notice then that in the 3±¡ planes of humind’s perception of physical systems the frequency of time is measured differently, as frequency of a wave in ¡-1 quantum physics, temperature vibration in ∆º thermodynamics and Mass, a vortex of accelerated information in ∆+1 mechanics. And as we change planes translations of those concepts are needed, since they slightly vary in meaning and dimensions, and a thorough redefinition of mass ‘seen as solid’ in our scale long overdue. This time concept is akin to information, St, stored in the frequency of cycles, NOT to Tt-Time entropy which means inner and outer explosion=motion.* And different from Energy which is ST, the balance of St-frequency/information and Ts-locomotion, momentum.* Most human measures called ‘energy’ are NOT about the 3^{rd} Dimotion of energy, which ‘keeps its balance of form and motion’ but about entropic states of scattering form and expansive motion in spatial information. For example in E=mc^{2}, a mass vortex of physical information is trans-formed into an entropic expansion of space, loosing its form. So we do NOT measure its energy but its entropy. Human Energy then works as a parameter of the entropic scattering motions due to the death or big-bang of a physical system, exploding its form. This again becomes the case for Heat, which measures the entropy=motion extracted from a thermodynamic ensemble, useful for man to be transformed into ‘real energy-ordered motion’ in its ∆+1 scale.

So the best way to go around would be to throw all definitions and start from scratch with St, Ts, Tt, Ss and ST dimotions; to avoid unending confusions. That’s what I do in my personal research but public texts try to convert old minds to new wording, so it is difficult because science has given up in verbal concepts and just care for the mathematical mirror regardless of understanding. So Time frequency in those equations is mediated by ƒ in E=Hƒ, T in E=knT and m in E=mv^{2}/2; but as E sometimes mean entropy and sometimes energy, confusion happens. As energy is used often instead of momentum outside physics confusion happens. As there are so many different time versions, confusion happens from Tt to St… which makes difficult to harmonize all jargons.

– Consider Space that has also so many meanings. On one hand is defined as a simultaneous mental still image of time motions. But on those equations it rather corresponds to a sum of quanta of a population of h ∆-1 plancktons, K-boltzs and c^{2 }photons in E=mc^{2}. And so we would have to explain why C^{2} is the unit of ‘light space’ the background of our world with long disquisitions made in our papers on math physics and algebra.

Spatial populations in that sense are often the ‘past-memorial’ residual persistent form left by a ‘dynamic time vibration’, reason why a Gaussian probabilistic curve becomes a population distribution and quantum can be cast in probabilities in time, and molecular quantum physics in statistical mechanics, as SóT.

Should we give up? I don’t because I am translating the clear St-Tt-Ss-sT-ST parameters. As the reader might try to do the inverse he might get lost.

Fact is only once we establish the meaning of the 5 Dimotions of reality we can ‘ascribe’ every parameter of science to one of those dimotions either in a ceteris paribus analysis as a partial space or time function or as a complex entangled space-time function in functions that describe a time-space being mutating its 5D metric through the 5 ‘graduations’ of motion and form, from entropy («, scattering motion, which is both motion internal and external to the being), locomotion, < (only external motion), reproduction, ≈, evolution, > (internal mostly with external shrinking) and linguistic seeding, », still perception in crystal and solid or mental states whereas an active magnitude creates from a field of motion a seed of form.

__The metric functions of the 3 main planes of space-time of the galatom.__

* In physics we have 3 Energy equations. However the E of those equations is closer to entropy, as we measure the flow of motion/radiation humans will then ‘form’ into useful work-energy: *

So if we just consider a general 5D metric for those 3 equations of physical scales such as E is for humans a function of entropy and pass frequency as a function of lineal time that give us a scalar constant, so we write:

*Entropy (E) x Time Duration (1/ƒ) = Constant of motion of a given scale.*

The connection between both concepts is subtle. And each case would require a deep analysis given the extension and complexity achieved in mathematical physics, which are the last papers I download – so much work so little time left… *What we want to stress here is that form is only measured indirectly. *

When we express the entropic energy without caring for its ‘informative details’, multiplied by its time duration, we ‘erase’ the constant of space-time into a flow of entropic motion humans can use. But if we keep the system entangled without loss of information as E = C^{2} x ƒ (ðime=cyclical time:ƒ); we can talk of the ‘inner energy’ of the system, E, as a ‘population sum’, of ‘space-time C^{2}-beings’, as in a wave of light which is a sum of ƒ-Plancktons.

As S=T Frequency measures also a population of plancktons packed in denser space (S-view) or moving faster (T-view), or being smaller which in 5D metrics, SxT=C, means also they are faster. But as the electronic mind ‘trans-forms’ time-motion into space-information the speed is irrelevant, in fact the brain distinguish the density of Spatial populations of information as ‘color’ . And the electron has entangled into a still state of form with the other electron (reason why C-speed is constant, regardless of the background speed of the larger Gravitational scale, as both atoms are in parallel speed when sharing information; as any system that talks. I.e. you walk at the same speed). This is the 5D view on special relativity speeds. And as usual in pentalogic all those truths carry a part of the whole possible view: T-speed, St-frequency, S=T entanglement, Ts, human perception of locomotion according to our scale that inputs gravitational motion (Einstein’s relativity calculus) and finally Tt-entropy extracted from the photon wave.

So bearing in mind those subtle distinctions, 5D metric functions, E x T = C^{2} or E = C^{2} x ð, give us the 3 functions of mathematical physics regarding its 3 ‘scalar planes’ (graph). But c^{2} must be taken as quanta of still light rather than c-speed; as in an electron which is a nebulae of c^{2} still light spread in a bidimensional area, trapped in the potential well of the black hole proton within its ‘event horizon’, which is the electron border, in the disomorphic parallelism between the galaxy and the atom, where each still photon is a star of the electronic-galactic plane.

It is then when those ∆+1 c^{2} become equivalent to the h-plancktons of ∆-1, which are the spin values of the electron nebulae, while the ƒrequency in E=hƒ are akin to the mass frequencies in E=Mc^{2}, reason why we can fusion both equations to give us for M-> ƒ (h/c^{2}), whereas the compound universal constant h/c^{2} translates ∆-1 into ∆+1 parameters. But essentially both equations mean the same. C^{2 }then becomes an entity of its own in Maxwell’s equations, as C^{2}=1/µe=k/µ (omitting the π factor), whereas K is the curvature of the charge scale and µ the magnetic constant of vacuum. So we are expressing c^{2} in terms of the curvature of its space-time scale akin to the tension of a string, divided by its magnetic ‘density’, akin to the density of the string, which translates the speed of light to the classic formalism of the speed of a wave (tension/density). And again the details change with scale, dimensionality etc, but the concepts remain.

Energy thus for any Universal world, in its totality is the sum of all the volume of space-time of all the scales of the being, in its totality, which is also a composite product of its beats and bites, reason why we divide Energy in the mechanical scale into kinetic energy (Lineal) and O-positional energy. But then we must add the dual energies of the internal parts of the system. Energy thus can transfer between scales, but the true magic of the worldcycle is that on the long term it returns to the scale from where it departs, so the balance of total energy of each plane remains the same. It is then energy infinite in the Universe? It amounts to the question of the infinity of scales, which seems possible due to the parallelism between atoms and galaxies. Though it is possible to develop a metaphysic theory of perception that is circular.

We can deduce it, because a vortex in an SHM gives birth when uncoiled to a wave whose energy is measured by the first of those E=Hƒ equations., in the simplest case of E=h ƒ, which is the uncoiled SHM motion of its 5D cyclical vortex view we observe immediately that *the frequency has uncoiled the cyclical beats of existence of the being; and is the equivalent term to Energy, as H is constant. *But in the vortex of existence we noticed that the two elements that grew in parallel were the ‘bits of existence’ or units of perceptive information and the ‘angular speed’ of the vortex, while it was preserved the length travelled or volume of space-time for 3 dimensions.

So the constants, H, and by extension to other scales, K and C; are the constants of each scale of the fifth dimension, those are the 3 ∆±¡ scalar constants of physics; and they allow a wide range of ‘equal lives’, which can be exhausted, ‘squeezed’ in very tiny instants of ‘intense bits’ (higher frequency, higher temperature, higher mass) or slower bits. But as the life of each species is the same, it also means what we see as a continuous particle is not, but the sum of discontinuous generations. I.e. the life of a photon is as fast as its worldcycle of existence (wave cycle), and the next wave cycle must be a new photon generation that lives traces its growth as a wave and reproduces in its locomotion, collapsing into a particle. So a sequential series of photon generations of much faster life happen for each E=Hƒ frequency. And obviously as time passes, the photon learns to live longer and elongates its wavelength towards red, but each wavelength is a life existence (in fact we consider 3 such a waves as 3 ages of decaying length; since 3 waves collapse in a particle).

So we write E(v) x 1/ƒ=T (lineal time= worldline) = H(k). That is, E(V) x T(Ro) = H(k), in terms of the equation of the vortex. Whereas the nebulous concept of Energy is rather secondary to the conserved quantities of Lineal and cyclical momentum, equivalent to the radius bites and frequency bits of each scale.

*Energy as we consider it is then a combination of those two essential |-momentum x O-momentum = Ø –constant of scale, topologic conserved elements. *And the E in those equations as we said is rather the kinetic, lineal energy/entropy humans capture to give it latter form. In existential terms what is conserved are the 3 ∆-scalar fundamental constants of the quantum scale of frequencies, the thermodynamic scale of temperatures and the cosmological scale of masses, the 3 representing the ‘speed of the bits of information=perception’ closed when the vibration of frequency, temperature and cyclical mass returns to the SMH original point.

*We can write those equations then either in terms of frequency or time duration:*

*E(v,w) x T (duration) =Constant of scale (H, K, c) =E(v,w) / ð(ƒ)*

The smaller being moves much faster, with ‘more energy’, processing information also much faster, with higher ‘frequency’. So he thinks he is much more smarter and powerful than the slow low density larger guy, but alas!, after its usual phyla/family total number of beats, ±11^{11 }he collapses. And the bigger turtle finally arrives to the same point the smallish Achilles reached; see it dead and collapses too.

From those conserved elements, volume of space-time of scale (Universal constants of scale) and beats of existence, then by making different iterations and transformative combinations, we can extract the conserved quantities of physics, angular momentum, closer to the frequency beats, and lineal momentum and kinetic energy, closer to the concept of energy, lineal speed and entropic motion. It really doesn’t matter they are not exactly equivalent, as long we understand them in terms of the fundamental principles the Universe conserves, ‘scale volumes’ and ‘beats’ of existence. Humans for historic reasons, have chosen slightly different physical quantities, and made of energy a word for many different states of reality, and they are not going to change ever those routines before its beats of existence as a species, now closer to conclusion end. It is worth though to see them from the higher perspective of 5D and its conserved quantities, $ x ð = K.

So the fundamental elements of those scales are the h, k, C constants of the 3 physical scales; which are dimotional ratios between the frequency of informative time cycles or a spatial population (T =S duality) of an entity, which can be seen also as a quantitative number of energy, related to the frequency of motion (lineal kinetic energy) or in terms of spatial storage/population (potential energy), also in its T=S duality.

But we know there are different ‘families’ of species with different ‘existential momentum’ as we saw in the different metabolic rate of hot mammals and low temperature animals. Those families however are a few, and can all be classified as relative multiples of the constants of scale, H, K, c within a limited range, for the reasons explained in the next paragraph, *essentially the need for existence in a range of balance in S=T. *

To understand this as usual is best to consider first the case better observed for being closer to humans – thermodynamic species. Of them, there are basic 3, gas, liquid and solid. Gas having more freedom and less density has a relative heat capacity of 3/2 KT by particle, which increases in different families of ‘tighter, denser social organisms’, as we move to diatomic molecules, to the maximal energy capacity of crystal solids, with more modes of vibration, rotation and translation; *that is a richer number of Dimotions, not only lineal locomotion as gas is, but social states, organic dances. This leads basically to the simultaneity of monologic, dilogic, trilogic tetralogic and pentalogic states, and beyond to what would be the maximal possible number of simultaneous states (dodecaplex systems, 120 simultaneous particles, states in complex mass systems). *

Because the reader has a ‘physical view of reality’, and after all is a human being with very few mind states, is difficult to capture the essence of this. Energy is the spatial view of the maximal number of states of existence happening in simultaneity, which grows with the complexity of the system and is maximal for mammals in life, for crystals in physics for quantum boson states in particles, where we notice readily the similarity of those ‘stairs of states’ in the different ‘spin numbers’ of particles and atoms, ½, 1, 3/2, 5/2 h, as we saw in molecules, 3/2 k, 5/2 K etc. Further on as we grow in ∆-scale; the next nested Universe is a ‘better family all together’ with more ‘dimensional motions’ in simultaneity, to ‘encircle’ the previous scale. So the number of h-states in particles is smaller than the number of K-states in molecules, which in the peculiar confusing language developed by huminds is a measure of growing ‘entropy’. Families of states though, as we said tend to be the 3 canonical trinity of ‘young gaseous, liquid, S=T, and solid Max. S x Min. T’, and so when we go to ‘families of masses’, there are 3 families of quarks, the holders of mass (that is, the inner nested ∆-3 nucleus, whose spins have negative beta temperature and his outer co-existing membrain encloses molecules).

It is absurd to talk of ‘frequency’ in the ‘scale of temperature’ and of ‘temperature’ in the scale of masses. As in the new scale those parameters would have to be considered inverse; something finally recognized with the adoption of the beta parameter of coldness, and its negative temperature when we move to the nested Universe of highly ordered spins from below or masses from above. As it should be absurd to talk of ‘spin’ when we move below the scale of light space-time, into the realm of neutrinos=gravitons, or of attractive gravitation in the outside scale of the hyper-universe, which is governed by the equivalent electromagnetic repulsion between galatoms. When we change between planes of existence, there is a social grouping of ‘frequencies’ from a time sequence to a ‘spatial simultaneous perception’ T>S, as it collapses into something else (Temperature); in the same manner that the orbital of its electrons that define single atomic form collapse into something else emerging as molecular motion; so from the frequency orbital numbers of quantum atoms we move the temperature vibrations of molecules; and from h-ratios of scale to k ratios of scale; and this again happen when we move to mass that has therefore ‘negative temperature’, as it orders thermodynamic into simultaneous wholes of the cosmological scale. And again, those are the 3 scales huminds perceive, as we are thermodynamic beings, which therefore only perceive the upper envelope of mass and the lower plane of quantum spins.

Yet those 2 limits always create an interval. So as all supœrganisms of time-space co-exist in 3 scales, we have a thermodynamic world, between the outer gravitational ‘membrain-mind’ and the quantum reality, whose measures of timespace, are *specific for each molecular supœrganism and sub-species sandwiched between *the galaxy*’s ‘lower’ informative h-time quanta and the larger lineal c-time *rod of measure – the speed of light. We belong in between where all kind of supœrganisms that cannot go faster than light or process information in quanta smaller than an h-planckton have its specific thermodynamic time cycles, to synchronize our 3 sub-scales with ‘nitrogen’ clocks and 3 vital parts, in space which in the human case is the second ‘beat’ of the heart, length of the thought, glimpse of the eye, measure of a dual stœp, (and ½ second of it is indeed the musical beat that we find more harmonious to synchronize our dance). For all those beings H and C are just ‘Ss and Tt’ limits. They cannot cross.

** **

** REPRODUCTIVE WAVES ≈ e x i**

Present is the dominant dimotion in which the entropic past and the informative future, act as limits of existence, where existence does no longer happen for that specific local variation of the time-space dimotions.

All the laws of conservation of physics (energy, momentum, etc.) are in fact expressions of the most general law of a constant reproductive Universe, where systems reproduce the same forms once and again, as even simple motion is reproduction.

**Entropy, the dimotion of disorder that erases information, the dimotion of order. **

“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is. So in a debate you will always have the advantage.”

*Von Neumann to Shannon, father of Information Theory.*

Since I was a kid, what call my attention on the Intelligent Universe were those ‘big concepts’, starting by Energy, Information, Space and Time, which are the widest concepts of reality. And found many obvious errors in the way humans tried to IMPOSE their opinions, gadgets and machines to the Universe.

So the first human, mechanical bias is the way we measure time. We do NOT use any longer as we used to do the cyclical rhythms of nature, but the mechanical clock, and try to reduce all the cycles of nature to that mechanical clock and its steady state one second rhythm. And we pretend that is the ‘absolute time rhythm and only one of the Universe!

This is akin to the old ways of astronomers who tried to impose to the Universe the frame of reference of the Earth as its center. It does work despite its bias, so with complicated cycles you can explain it all, from the point of view of the Earth, but calculations become very complex with epicycles and extant, etc.

So happens when you do NOT use the clocks of Nature, which soon will be defined here. Physics does work but it is overall very complicated when dealing with different time rhythms, and one century after Einstein found there are many such time rhythms and some change its speed there is zero understanding of this.

We just put some ‘new epicycles’ called Lorentz Transformations, but since we are stuck to our ethnocentric clock, as old astronomers to their earth-centric world, the explanations are blurred. Men merely try to feed the Universe onto their ‘time view’ or rather mechanical view of time. And the Universe is much ore complex and rich in clock rhythms than that.

Indeed, why we Humans use a mechanical clock with an artificial rhythm to measure time; If the Universe has infinite rhythms? It is just an ego trip and the worship of machines that characterize the western civilization. Thus when the Brits got to China to sell their ware, was the answer of Tao=time masters: why we want to buy your ugly mechanical clocks if we can observe the Universe with its clocks of nature, its cyclical rhythms? Obviously, the mechanical clock with its single steady state time cycle IS a human artifact.

Time did exist before mechanical clocks with his own rhythms. Its own Universal time clocks. The mechanical clock is NOT a Universal time clock. So the use of this human clock to measure all the time clocks of the Universe bias our concepts of time, and ‘hides’ the clocks of nature. So the next fundamental question in our search for proper definitions of time, entropy and black holes becomes obvious:

– What are the true clocks of nature? And once we find how Nature measure its cyclical time frequencies, we shall wonder are those rhythms of time stable, steady state rhythms as those of our mechanical clocks, or they change rhythms, have different ‘time speeds? And how they measure information and create it, as opposed to the creation of disorder and entropy? And which of those concepts order or disorder dominates the Universe?

The beats of lineal vs. cyclical stillness and motion, give us its natural 4 combinations:

- Lineal motion, lineal form, cyclical motion, cyclical form, which we shall call generically:
- Entropy or ‘kinetic energy’ (lineal motion), space (lineal form).
- time (cyclical motion) and information (cyclical form).

Those 2 forms then combine into all possible space-time membranes, and so the iterative game of creation starts in earnest.

Further on, we can consider each dual system with a lineal and cyclical limb/field particle/head, to be able to ‘change’ its state, from relative lineal motion in which the limbs and fields interact with the outer world translating in space the system and relative still, cyclical motion/form where the system perceives. This beat of ‘day and night’, energy and form, motion and stillness thus translates into the dynamic, topological transformations of living beings.

* ***Entropy confused with energy.**

In that regard, lineal entropy is completely accessory, the disordered ‘gaseous’, purely spatial (without temporal causality), expansive state of pure motion without information, in which all systems end up and can be equated to death or erasing of information – including today our societies returned to a dog-eat-dog selfie, fast-moving state are – not death in the usual perception of lack of motion, as the Universe started in pure motion, so paradoxically death is a return to a pure motion state.

So a first look at entropy is required as the state of expansive space, which happens *when the St singularity, of maximal form that orders the system does NOT exist and so the system lives in a disordered state.. in a non-memorial, non-causal ‘Markowian’ process – the technical name to memoriless realities in which what happens at each quanta of time matters not in the next one, as information is not conserved:*

*When the • singularity dies , all the system looses information and becomes disordered, and so it is proper of states that lack ‘informative vortices’, masses and charges, or eddies of thermodynamic flows, such as gaseous states, dark entropy between galaxies or ‘quantum fields’ in the realist Pilot-wave theory, studied in detail in the fourth line. *

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future dimotion of time, or death dimotion of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that dimotion to the entire universe, because they don’t care to understand conceptually, ‘Feynman-style’, Einstein and his findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic dimotion of expansive space between galaxies (hence both dimotions as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time.

Entropy pure motion will then be the base from where all other forms will rise to transform motion – that *is the concept which is behind all mathematical equations of all systems, and so entropy ‘as a ratio’ parameter will always have more speed that the other two components of the system.*

**ENTROPIC POTENTIALS, FEEDING WAVE MOTIONS… AND SINGULARITIES**

The study of potentials as the fourth dimension of physical systems has as all elements a Kaleidoscopic view. They are the source of motion, within the astrophysical realm. But of them we only see the trajectory of motion of the particle, so they can be treated in less dimensions, in fact as the single string, which the waving of information transforms into a 2D element. But in its complete form they are 4D systems, susceptible to be treated with a lineal time dimension and 3 dimensions of ’empty-lineal space’, which is *its canonical analysis with differential equations such as the Poisson or Laplace equation (**∇**(x,y,z,t)=r). *

What is its ultimate meaning? I like to think of it in Newtonian’s metaphysical terms as the ‘plenum, or body of vacuum space’ whose geometry shows the form of ‘God’, that is a given plane of the scalar Universe. So Poisson’s gradient is the body of the galactic light space on which all other ‘micro-entities’ co-exist.

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

The question of light motion as a wave and the particle state as an informative collapsed point in stillness brings though as always in stience when solving a paradox – in this case the paradox of motion -new questions.

If motion is reproduction of information along a path of entropy, which is ‘warped into form’ emerging in a series of scales of ∆-wholeness, so when you move your hand, you are actually recreating all your scales above invisible gravitation – creating a wave of electronic light that travels very slow as it reproduces your system, the first question is: how many scales are in the Universe for motion to happen at all? The scales cannot be infinite or reproduction of information will be eternal. But the question is misleading, *since a wave does not really move but transmits a series of vibrations to particles that are already there, in a dense ‘medium’. *

*This brings the question of ‘ether’, of ‘substance or form in space’ over ‘motion in time’. As many other open questions which we shall treat in other posts on depth, we just enunciate them in this introduction. *Enough to say that science is not written into stone but an evolving concern, so relativity is not a dogma, but an interpretation, which was good enough in its moment and we shall expand further.

In practical terms *the key way to understand t.œs is with multidimensional thought. *The solution adopted by Einstein and Bohr was pure idealism of the Hilbert school – there is no substance, no reference, all is virtual language, mathematical thought.

But physical systems as all systems are dominant in present states, signified in physics by waves. Waves carry both entropic motion and cyclical form and as such are the natural present, reproductive, e > iƒ element of reality, whereas we use e and i for entropy & energy (max. e x min. i) information (max. f x min. e).

Systems that take and give entropy and form, become then energy systems able to communicate and start the building of larger scales of the fifth dimension.

The dominance of present thus stays within the game and provokes the constant reproduction of motion along scales.

**The inverse view: how masses become entropy, descending in ∆-scales and dimensional form.**

But as always in 5D³ we need multiple perspectives on the being. So we wonder, how the inverse ‘destruction’ of a vortex of time-space happens, NOT in algebraic form (M<c²), but in topological dimensions, a more general case of application to all vortices – and the answer is simple: through the reduction of ‘dimensions of distance-form’ into its equivalent (Galilean paradox) dimensions of motion-acceleration, proving that both ARE equivalent, expressed in the fact that ‘G, K’ are both constants of curvature and constants of acceleration… (and constant of the speed of feeding and transmit ions of information from the entropic view, so c²=4π k/µ).

And so we write the inverse ‘view’ of the destruction and lowering of scale of an informative, physical vortex as an inverse partial Generator equation:

∆+1 Mass ( St) < ∆-ST-c ² < ∆-1: Ts: 4πk/µ

**Electrostatics, a simple case of mathematical physics to illustrate entropic potentials in all planes.**

LET US illustrate the case considering a first insight on the combination of a complex ∆s≈t view of mathematical physics which deals with ‘dimensionality’ to establish the 3 ‘dimotions of timespace’ in the different ‘views’ of the mathematical humind (topological bidimensional or three dimensional forms and even more complex 6-D tensors, or simpler 3 D of space-time, x,y,z) of the 3 different parts of the being, given the simplicity of the electrostatic equations, which work in 3 Sx,y,z and ignore time motion now that we have talked of potentials, the ∆-2 plane of an organism of physics.

As such potentials provide *minimal information to the humind, not because its scale has no form but because we ONLY extract motion of it, by PROVOKING entropic destruction of the ‘feeding’ energy of the potential, whatever it is. And this shows by a double differentiation, in which the particle’s informative density differentiates=lowers a plane to the wave-field, which lowers a plane of dimensional information to the potential field.*

This is obviously a case of the generator: ∆-1 Potential > ∆-wave > ∆+1 particle, whereas mathematical physics uses ∆nalysis to derivate or integrate scales.

Let us put the example: how we calculate electric potentials, relating potentials to the charge density which gives rise to it.

The electric field (wave: ∆) is related to the charge density (∆+1) by the divergence relationship:

∇ E = 4π k ρ (we escape the meaningless ε as what matters is the inverse k-urvature; and we use ratios, densities, as absolute parameters are also meaningless in a relative Universe where the @mind, charge or mass has limited view beyond ∆±3)

So a first derivate takes us from the particle density to hew ave-field. And then again the electric field is related to the electric potential by a gradient relationship: E=-∇ V

Therefore the potential is related to the charge density by Poisson’s equation:

∇·∇V=∇²V=- 4π kρ

So this is all what the charge-singularity measure by density and curvature=strength, wants of its 2 down feeding ‘quantum potential’ or ‘vacuum space’: to extract motion of it for its wave-particle.

But *without the charge, our electronic mind sees nothing and so it seems magic, and of course the ego paradox of creationism make us think that the charge creates the lower class-prey, the vacuum space quanta; it only ‘feeds on it’ when it appears. *

So n a charge-free region of space, the potential becomes zero information – the Laplace’s equation:

∇² V = 0

Then we can also consider another rule of ‘endophysics’ (the science that considers the observer but not from the ego creationist paradox of quantum physics but the opposite mind’s limits): the *nature, will and cause of any physical event will belong to the ST-cartesian mind view, the T-polar singularity or the S-cylindrical coordinates, according to the maximal simplicity of its equations.*

So by expressing the Laplacian in different coordinate systems we can realise what is the ‘source’ of the event; as the type of topological symmetry of a charge distribution helps in the solution for the electric potential V. For example, if the charge distribution has spherical symmetry, originated therefore by a singularity point, we use the Laplacian in spherical polar coordinates.

And viceversa *as *the potential give us the minimal information, it is a scalar function. And so departing from it, has advantages over trying to calculate the electric field directly. Once the potential has been calculated, the electric field can be computed by taking the gradient of the potential; from downwards up. And this is a great advantage of the Rashomon effect – *obscured by creationist economics and the eternal argument between each one-dimensional humind ego about which model is more ‘real’ and truth – all are just different points of view, whose use depends on our need of information on the receiving end and the origin of the event on the giving one*.

BUT if we were to reduce all the povs is OBVIOUS that the key POVS are those of the 3 symmetries of reality, the scalar view just described (∆±i), the temporal view (here we would have to discuss a different continuity equation to get similar results) and the spatial-topological view, which are the *3 sub-symmetries of the generator, done with the awareness that mind-tricks might need some further input (as all relativity consistent expansions of classic physics).*

So the previous symmetry of this simple ‘case’ illustrates it. If we were to use the topological view, of the 3 ‘parts of the electron super organism, the potential in its pure form will be outside the system, the wave, now in a ‘spherical time§paœrganism’ will be the membrane with its ‘2 sides’, the one towards the outside field and the one towards the inside organism, and the internal gradient towards the singularity will be the T-element. And the KEY element will be THE PART the humind perceives, which as the previous graph shows tends to be the membrane. Indeed, you see from any other human its membrane; and for those species you can decode its information-mind you can ‘hear’ its singularity thoughts, but normally the membrain – the so called boundary conditions in physics is the key to ‘convert’ into equations the whole being from the humind utility pov.

So what we just studied become the ‘best’ VIEW for a ternary topological perspective in this case for a uniform sphere of charge, which will be its spherical polar coordinates, since there is full spherical symmetry here. And we found that the outside potential of a point charge at large distances is extremely simple: V= k Q/r; that is for an electron Ke, which we shall see is indeed the ‘curvature x charge’ divided by the distance, r.

Inside in the singularity-body region is more complex, dimensionally richer with more information and *the due uncertainty for the external observer, the humind*: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d.

Without getting in mathematical details on how we get this equation, *the key element to find the ‘vanished info, d’ on the inside sphere is the fact that the membrane has 2 sides, which must be essentially equal in the element we calculate, the potential, as the open ball membrane is enormously ‘thin’. *

*So we can equate here the T element (inside) and the S element, outside, with the ST-element, S=T (the fundamental equation of the universe for all present systems). And so we equal both: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d. = kQ/r, which gives us the canonical * full solution for the potential inside the sphere from the topological view, with the 3 elements together:

V=* – ρ 2/3 k (R² -r²)+ ρ2/3k R²*

And then if we add the continuity dynamic time-equation we have the 3 symmetries.

So we shouldn’t be surprised of the fact mathematical physics is essentially a game of very few equations despite the enormous variety of partial forms, as they correspond to the very simple number of elements that conform reality.

This again can be seen next if we have a look at the ∆+1 simple gravitational equations first described in physics, Kepler’s law and relate them to ∆st beings.

But before an important dual coda:

“In the fractal Universe, the present space-time element IS the most perceived”. “In the fractal Universe, the existence of membranes that break space into an inner and outer region, limiting the information we perceive beyond ‘the wall’.

Both are illustrated by the case studied. Indeed, because we adopt an external view, the inner region has a d-uncertain factor. But what we obtain is the information of the relative present (as here V is $), the membrane. If we were inside the system though the uncertainty as in the galaxy, is the outside potential (dark entropy region). And finally what is past, present and future is also relative. If we were inside closer to the singularity, then the vital energy of the open ball will be the present, and often the past and future, singularity and membrane uncertain (we do not have indeed much info of the black hole and the halo, because we are in the ud-region between them).

*The ternary planes in potentials. *

Now this is from wikipedia, negrita is mine, to show i ‘don’t bend reality’ (:

Laplace’s equation and Poisson’s equation are the simplest examples of elliptic partial differential equations. The general theory of solutions to Laplace’s equation is known as potential theory. The solutions of Laplace’s equation are the harmonic functions, which are important in many fields of science, notably the fields of** ∆-1:** electromagnetism, **∆+1:** astronomy, and **∆œ** fluid dynamics, because they can be used to accurately describe the behavior of **∆-1:** electric, **∆+1:** gravitational, and **∆œ** fluid potentials. In the study of **∆œ:** heat conduction, the Laplace equation is the steady-state heat equation.

So obviously physics of potentials is perfectly encased, no more, nor less to fit the 3 physical planes, all of which are self-similar and all of which have a potential death, ∆-2 bottom line of microscopic indistinguishable particles from where the field and singularity extracts its motion.

** **

**CHIRALITY AND PARITY GENDER IN SCALES.**

** Left handed female particles v. right handed machos**

Since Pasteur studied chemistry’s optic activity finding molecules that polarize light in different we know molecules are ‘chiral’, either left-handed or right-handed, why? Because CHIRALITY is the true meaning of ‘gender’, left-handed systems are female systems and right-handed male systems. So they can superpose onto each other looking at each other, pegging their palms, and reproduce. FOR A physicist this is ONLY ‘a mirror symmetry’ an it has a pathetic pedantic mathematical proof that reveals nothing. For a physicist it is a ‘matrix coordinate that changes sign’…

Not so, chirality has ALL the properties of gender. And it emerges in each scale of the fifth dimension till becoming so complex that voila it becomes sexual gender. First you have the neutrino, which is ONLY female, left handed, as the galaxy which is ALSO female left handed. The left handed neutrino thus is the one we see at c-speed (the right handed goes faster than c-speed), and when they mate they reproduce a light ray (Broglie Jordan’s theory of neutrino light; exactly when both spins penetrate each other locking in spin up and down like penis and vulva do; alas then you have slightly more left handed electrons, as you have slightly more females being born.

The weak trans-form-ation of left-handed ‘chiral female’ species happening in the same point (Fermi’s model) latter stretched to accommodate Born rule with a small displacement for the intermediate ‘pregnant’ massive W±,Z,H states.

Moreover, ONLY left-handed particles (female ones) REPRODUCE new particles, through the weak force, which is NOT a force but the process of particles becoming ‘pregnant’, fattened by energy (women only become pregnant with extra energy), so they become a fat massive z particle and then they reproduce a bunch of other particles; but RIGHT-handed particles are sterile, are males, they do NOT reproduce other particles through the weak force… And then you get a left handed electron coupling with the proton but the result is a sterile right handed atom, there are NOT left handed atoms so they do NOT reproduce other atoms… and then you get the left handed amino acid which the top predator nucleotides neutered, killing all the right handed so they cannot REPRODUCE and are at the mercy of the RNA left and right that control them and reproduce/mate as mirror images to form the DNA, and voila now we are into left handed women (left brain dominant), slightly outnumbering at birth as left handed amino acids on primordial soups…

But why the left handed is woman? Because its head SPIN is orientated inward to his body-wave momentum, so they can in a’hyperbolic topology’, similar to the woman’s body with is ‘glass-hour figure’, combine its energy and information to reproduce, as women are connected in brain to the hypothalamus, but right handed are lineal, BOTH SPIN and momentum, body and wave move ahead; they have slightly more ENERGY than women, which are preferred by the universe that seeks the less energy state… So the right handed sterile machos go faster (so the right handed neutrinos go faster than light, reason why we do not see them)… And all this then connects wit the duality of particle, antiparticle left and right handed, life and death, antiparticles kill and die fast… and so on and so on…

The first gender level in the Universe is called parity. Asexual spheres do not have parity. Parity requires a mirror symmetry, and so we shall call left handed species women, and right handed species male:

The graphs, as all others taken from a SciAm’s article of chirality shows the achiral, non-sexual sphere, the chiral male-female screws and hands. Notice that right handed male systems show the ‘same directionality’ between the ‘head’ of the screw and the direction of ‘penetration’ of its body; while left handed female systems show inverse ‘complementary’ directions between the head and the body in its penetration the medium. They are ‘balanced’ female systems with inverse directions between body and head. While male systems are ‘lineal’, on the same path, with no paradoxical contradiction. Left handed females are more abundant in nature because they are the ‘state’ of minimal energy and maximal immobility as both tendencies, S and T contradict. The male is ‘physically’ bigger, faster as both directionalities are in the same path.

We observe chirality in all scales as it emerges from one to the other. Parity then would be the equal quantity of both. But as it turns out, the Universe prefers the ‘lesser energy consuming, balanced’ female species, in all its scales. So the electron tends to be left handed favored in the weak Z force – the time force of transformation in the height axis of information (the female axis), which the male (lineal, moving, in the length dimension) doesn’t even notice.

In the next scale of atoms, amino acids of L-enantiomere nature dominate and when reproduced from primordial atoms they are slightly more numerous, as they consume less energy. While energetic sugar molecules (male species), tend to be more D-dominant. So happens among humans which slightly favor the birth of female species. Moreover most proteins and enzymes responsible for the reproduction of life are L (in fact as any student knows all our amino acids are L, the why though is a selective ‘choice’ of likely Nucleotides, to prevent amino acids and proteins to reproduce without their intervention – we must say that in the different ‘ages’ of life, nucleotide dominant top predator molecules ‘castrated’ proteins.

In the second graph we see this choice as we ‘grow in scales’, meaning than in the hierarchical Universe, the upper dominant wholes ‘control’ the choice of reproductivity of the lower planes. So while the Universe is chiral, it tends to choose the inverted S><T complementary female of less energy, even if the difference of quantities is smaller.

Sexuality then arises of the mirror symmetry that allows to ‘peg’ in opposite directions, hence ‘attractive’ directions two inverse left and right handed. You can indeed bring them together to penetrate each other, or coil one around the other, which is the *ultimate meaning of gender, the pegging together in an attractive mirror fashion of two beings, one dominant in energy, the male species and the other in form, the female one. *

This dominance of left-handed is ultimately within the supœrganism of the galatom connected to the fractal nature of the galaxy, which is you guess it left handed, as the electron and the weak force in its preferences, which simply goes up in scales.

But the true reason of the dominance of left handed system is the same than the need for sexual chirality: Since the female S><T combine in inverse directions the body and head they are ‘asexually reproductive’, while male and achiral species are not. So because the dimotion of reproduction dominates systems, females become dominant and in some species as the L-amino acids of proteins and DNA (which in fact is a combination of both type of spirals pegged into each other), the only one. Let us then resume the game of existence to show the dominance of the Dimotion of reproduction.

**The W, Z, Higgs bosons and the weak force of the 5th dimension.**

The proper arrangement of particles according to 5d and its dimotions and 3 scales: the weak force is not a force but the dimotion of social evolution and entropic dissolution between vortices of time of maximal speed, aka quarks. it follows that as there are 3 transformative middle states from light to heavy quarks (z,w,h), there are also 3 states of the particles, in each of its 3 families as there are 3 boson fields in the 3 scales, the neutrino, photon and gluon, there are 3 electrons, the tau, muon and electron and 3 quark atomic families, which we might reclassify as the strange and top quark decuplets, the ud-light atom and the cb atom and its massive gluon quark liquids of strangelets in stars and top quarks in black holes

In that sense, the weak force and the heavy bosons, W, Z and H associated to them do NOT really give mass to particles. They are states of the process of transformation of particles of our smaller world into particles of the larger cosmological scales of heavy quarks, strange stars and black holes.

So the weak interaction represents *the duality of entropic and evolving dimotions of the fifth dimension in the physical scale of particles.*

This requires a note on the clear difference between the 3 ‘spatial forces’ that communicate energy and information between particles (strong, electromagnetic and gravitational forces) and the weak interaction, NOT a spatial force, but a process of trans-form-ation of particles into each other, which does NOT have spatial range (as when you change internally your form you don’t move; it all happens within you). So the proper way to model the weak interaction is as *an evolutionary process that trans-forms as in chemical reactions, one product into another – a particle into another.*

For that reason the ‘weak interaction’ *has a coupling constant measured in ‘time’; because it is an evolutionary process; and it does violate the CPT rule because ‘time is NOT symmetric as space’, or as Einstein put it, ‘wires don’t travel to the past’. *

Physicists know this, but only recently they start to recognize it, since they do LACK a proper 5D formalism of the duality of dimotions of time, entropy AND information, to explain not only ‘spatial forces’ but ‘temporal, informative transformations’.

As i was the leading researcher of duality, chairing the International congress of the discipline, which studies the Universe and all its systems with two dimotions of time, entropy and information, crafting the metric 5D formalism of a scalar Universe, where the weak force is the ‘needed’ force to evolve those particles into ‘higher 5D scales of mass’; obviously the weak interaction has called my attention for very long.

This different, limited role of the weak interaction is now slowly becoming the new ‘language’ of physics: “The weak force… least fits into our picture of what a force should do. …the categories of ‘attractive’ and ‘repulsive’ do not really fit …because it has the ability to change particles from one type to another. …The weak force can change one lepton into another *provided they are in the same generation*. The electron can be changed into an electron neutrino and vice versa, but the electron cannot be turned into the muon neutrino… Jonathan Allday, *Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang* (2016).

As in a chemical transformation where an ‘extra-boost’ of energy is needed to produce new compounds which will pass often through intermediate unstable compounds before reaching its final stable product; when a particle transforms into a heavier one, it needs an ‘extra-boost’ of energy, which is what the accelerator provides on Earth – the crunching and inner pressures of stars in Nature. So the LHC first transforms light quarks into the intermediate, brief state represented by the W, Z or Higgs boson; and finally becomes the final product – a heavy quark, completing its transformation (leaving also as chemical transformations that waste heat, a wasted cloud of lighter particles).

In this manner our up and down light quarks can be transformed into heavy strange quarks and become part of strangelets with the intermediate state of an W or Z boson; and heavier quarks can transform into the ‘top predator’ quark with its intermediate state of the heaviest of all those intermediate states, the Higgs boson.

The multiple interactions and connections between particles while fitting in the dimotions and dualities, and ternary symmetries and pentagonal logic of 5D physics are too long to relate here. Te notice that ultimately all are within those laws, which make its dualities and trinities all pervasive in all systems of nature. I.e. the W particles play a crucial role in interactions that turn one flavour of quark or lepton into another, as in the beta decay of a neutron, where a down quark turns into an up quark to form a proton.

Such flavour-changing interactions occur only through the weak force and are described by the SU(2) symmetry that underlies electroweak theory along with U(1). The basic representation of this mathematical group is a pair, or doublet, and, according to electroweak theory, the quarks and leptons are each grouped into pairs of increasing mass: (*u*, *d*), (*c*, *s*), (*t*, *b*) and (*e*, *v _{e}*), (μ,

*v*

_{μ}), (τ,

*v*

_{τ}). .

So with those basic concepts of 5D physics, we can now solve one of the great questions pending in twentieth-century physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which is the key to properly mathematize the different masses of all those quarks and deduce the speeds of its vortices. Te that aim, we must understand charges and masses as two fractal membranes of the Universe, not as two forces, that exist in the same continuous space-time. This is an improvement over Einstein relativity, but as the reader should understand by now, what fractal relativity has done is to improve Einstein by improving the mathematics he used, with the addition of fractal mathematics and the completion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and by improving the logic of his work with the addition of information, the second dimotion of time.

The equation that unifies charges and masses as a single type of force has been searched for one hundred years from the perspective of quantum particles, not with the geometrical/motion-based concepts of Einstein’s masses. Yet Einstein always said the unification equation should be based in the geometrical similarity between the equations of electromagnetism and gravitation and the equivalence principle between mass and acceleration.

Let us then use those simple principles. The existence of a fractal structure of space-time means that the electromagnetic world and the cosmological world are just two self-similar non-Euclidean membranes of space-time of two scales and charges and masses two self-similar vortices of two different scales.

So we shall be able to obtain for the first time theoretically, the value of the stronger universal constant of charges (Coulomb) by merely translating the jargon of a charge to the jargon of a vortex of space-time, which is the same in all scales. Since rotation is the essence of mass and the concept of a hard particle as a solid ball is a mere Maya of the senses, their only difference between quantum charges and cosmological bodies is the higher speed of rotation of charges and hence the stronger constant of the electromagnetic vortices of the quantum world.

This unification can be done with the mathematics of Newton, Poisson, or Einstein, which are just three stages in the constant refinement of the principle of equivalence and the geometrical analysis of the Universe. What matters is to understand the principles, which is what quantum cosmologists no longer do.

So now we have a quantum theory of gravitation and we can explore further both ways down and up the relationships.

The relationships between the particles of those two fractal scales, the cosmological and quantum scale, is the next great mystery of physics, resolved by the unification equation and Einstein’s mass theory. Te find that relationship, we must translate to the gravitational jargon the radius of a proton, the particle made of quarks and gluons in the quantum world. If the hypothesis of a self-similar membrane of space-time of different scales of size holds since both, a proton and a black hole in the two scales, are made of quarks, the proton must be a black hole of the electromagnetic scale and so its radius, when translated to the jargon of gravitation, must have the same formula than a black hole radius, called a Schwarzschild Horizon.

Again, the mathematics is fairly straight: we equal the Coulomb, gravitational constant=1.5×10ˆ29 and the electromagnetic radius of the proton written in the jargon of gravity with its classic formula that describes the same vortex, written in the jargon of electromagnetism:

Electromagnetic force (gravitational jargon) = G(q) M proton x m electron /r2 = e2/4∏eor2 =F (classic jargon)

A hydrogen atom will be then a mass vortex of space-time, where G(q) is the Coulomb constant as a gravitational constant with value 1.5 x10ˆ29.

Now we use the previous equation to find the electron Bohr radius as a gravitational vortex. Then the magic transformation happens. Take the previous equation

e2= 4∏eoGq(1.5 x10ˆ29) Mproton melectron

And put it into the electron radius: e2/m electron x c2 x4∏eo. Now cancel m electron and 4∏eo.

And you get the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world as follows: G(q)M/c2.

It is a much simpler formula, which means we are doing “good physics” according to Ockham’s principle. But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(q), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

Indeed in the cosmological world, beyond that radius light sinks toward the central singularity, where the black hole, a quark star resides. And beyond that radius, the electromagnetic flow sinks into the nucleus where quarks feed on light. In both worlds beyond those event horizons, light cannot escape. And yet the proton has a magnetic pole, through which it emits magnetic flows, equivalent to the dark energy, we shall see, black holes emit through its poles.

In other words, protons are self-similar to cosmological black holes in the quantum scale. And black holes are probably made of strings, gluons, and quarks as protons are. They should be therefore frozen quark stars, of the only variety of quarks which is positively charged, which happens to be also the densest of all quarks, the top quark, whose parameters as a condensate coincide with those of a cosmological black hole. And so a black hole is a top quark star, positively charged, the “self-similar proton” of a galactic atom.

St notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Q, departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time. He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows taking a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

But in what it concerns this book, the most interesting finding under the new U (q) value of the electromagnetic constant is the discovery that the proton horizon shows the same equation as that of a black hole, a Schwarzschild horizon. It means that a quark condensate is a black hole state and vice versa: a cosmological black hole is a deconfined state of billions of top quarks, a top quark star.

Now, the mathematical treatment of the equivalence principle to unify masses and charges can be done with the simplest descriptions of a vortex created by Newton and Poisson or with the more complex Riemannian geometries of Einstein. The general error of physicists and the obvious reason why this equation has not been found is precisely their rejection of the simplest mathematics of Newton and Poisson, which made the unification exceedingly difficult. Yet there was a second reason: the use of a single dimotion energy. So Einstein tried to unify cyclical vortices of mass and lineal electromagnetism (Maxwell’s equations) because he didn’t realize that he had to unify information and information (charges and masses) on one side and lineal forces with lineal forces (gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves), which has been done with the self-similar equations of gravito-magnetism.

Thus, in a universe of multiple fractal space-times, each one with a different content of spatial speed and informative density defined by a different G, electromagnetism and gravitation are merely two types of vortices with different sizes, hence different contents of space and time, which translates into different universal constants.

**∆•st view: MEMBRANE FORCES VS. SINGULARITY FORCES ≈ENTROPY vs. SOCIAL EVOLUTION.**

Once we have considered a generic analysis of the PHYSICAL T.œs’ duality between strong-gravitational atom-galaxy attractive singularity forces and the expansive electro-magnetic, membrane forces; we can fly upwards into the more general T.Œ VIEW:

So we distinguish ‘four fundamental forces’ of attraction-repulsion (depending on the pov of the observer), *which can be generalised in function – not in topological form, which we have repeated ad nauseam can only be applied exactly to pure forms (or those far away from the human observer, which therefore reduces its perception to pure form, and confuses time fast states with simultaneous space).*

The attraction we deal with is that of a present vital energy-spacetime open ball, which will experience 4 potential forces:

- A force that attracts the system to the ‘protein, time-cycle membrane’; in the atom to the electronic membrane; in the galaxy to the halo – this is a force related mostly to entropic expansion and destruction as ‘space grows’ towards the membrane, which also leave in and out by osmosis of any kind, motion and form.
- A force that attracts the system towards its informative ‘DNA’ singularity; in the atom the strong force to the quarks; in the galaxy the gravitational force to the black hole center – it is a force related to the informative implosion, as time speed grows towards the vortex. It is hence more accelerated than the expansive, decelerating entropically related motion to the membrane. And so it is also related to a growth of density and upwards lifting.

Yet while those membrane-entropic-expansive-decelerating, ∆-1 motion and its inverse ∆+1 informative-singularity-accelerated motions seem the ∆±1 paths, *the fact is both tend to kill, destroy and eat in bits and bites the components of the vital energy, and so they are both selfish, ab=using energy for the singularity and membrane. *

So they tend to be ‘resisted’, by the vital energy, which will itself show when its is ‘heady’ (not a headless automaton, pre-programmed viral cell, human enzyman slavish to its machines, red cell with no nuclei, light wave with a minimalist photon particle and so on). Otherwise it will just flow down or upwards and die.

So we might find two inverse anti forces, which try NOT to send the being either path, and keep it in the middle range balance.

And this is obvious for example in planetary systems which try NOT to fall down the path of the star. But, and this responds to an obvious question – which force is stronger; it ultimately falls into the sun-singularity, as the inward accelerated, compressing force is stronger. So the strong force is stronger than the expansive electromagnetic force that sends you in your way to the electron, and the gravitational force *should be stronger in a similar ‘fine constant’ proportion to the dark entropy forces that are in the galaxy-atom self-similar to the electromagnetic ones and expand space between galaxies.*

Then there is of course for the vital energy quanta of the open ball region forces towards its fifth dimension of social evolution, without MOTION to the singularity but rather ‘collapsing’ of the wave into a particle state; and viceversa, the scattering entropic fourth dimension of downwards dissolution.

When this happens ‘spontaneously’ not caused by the attractive power of membranes and singularities, it is a self-sustained process, which we distinguish by lack of relative motion of the particle towards the $ or ð regions, and because *it is a slower than the fastest of all processes, any process of death, with an exponential rate of maximal ‘growth’-dissolution (e being the constant of death≈decay). *

**T.œs follow T.Œ isomorphic laws.**

*This is a T.Œ law (T.œ used for particular timespaœrganisms, T. Œ FOR generalisation as the law is an isomorphism that happens in all systems.)*

So for example humans have a pull towards social love (5th dimension), a fear but unavoidable end into an entropic explosion, often caused by the larger whole, its nation, which sends you packing to the border/membrane where the hard proteins/weapons/electronic wall will likely kill you; or to the seemingly nicer central black hole; where the legal government will ‘jail you’ in a dense, quiet ‘hole’.

Do NOT be surprised we use often human comparisons, because that is the ULTIMATE MESSAGE OF T.Œ, we are all just time§pace beings subject to the same laws. Humans simply see more detail about themselves and simplify all other forms.

So the star falling in the black hole, the carbohydrate packed to serve the DNA and the man jailed for wanting r=evolutionary freedom, or the planet converted by ACCELERATORS into strangelets going to the halo of the galaxy, the photon sent to the electron, or the soldier going to defend the border ARE isomorphisms. So it is the bosonic piling of atoms or souls into a larger whole, subconscious collective god.

As we are working the physical world we shall not dwell on the injustice of national membranes and capitals ab=using the human lot and sheeple with financial and military zeal… But obviously to be ‘a solar system’ in the wilderness of the less dense, less informed open ball territory of a galaxy, or a photon in the atom-galaxy, its equivalent; is NOT the best position of the organism which is all about ‘membranes and singularities’, DNA and proteins, working together, strangelet halos and black holes, military borders and financial capitals.

The democratic placebo vote, the ‘permission’ to exist of the open ball, is just the wisdom of the singularity and membrane which has its ‘farming region’ in the middle to store its vital energy and slowly feed on, but ultimately *it will devour it all and without ‘pressure/density’ the emptied vital energy of the present body-wave will collapse and the membrane wrinkle, warp and the singularity without protection and feeding energy bust. Alas, death is the necessary reward to the abusive singularity-mnds that stiffen into stoppage, the vital energy of the re=productive body-wave and working class.*

So the strong/gravitational force sends you packing to the centre, the electromagnetic/dark entropy to the membrane and beyond into the coldness of infinite distances between galaxy-atoms; and no more translative forces are needed.

*As the weak force is NOT A FORCE, it has no range in space, it lasts much longer in time, as its coupling constant is indeed expressed in time intervals. And so it is a huge error of ‘space physicists who always want to transform time dimensions and processes into spatial rods, to treat weak forces as ‘fields’ (Higgs field) as spatial forces, by lack of time understanding.*

For an even more detailed break-down, we can consider *actually the 3 forces as dual scaling forces.*

So the strong force sends you to the centre, but *its membrane emerges from it as the nuclear force that encloses gluons and quarks in the centre of particles.*

Then the same concept works with charge, the singularity and membrane, the magnetic field, which ’emanates’ from the electric force; as an intermediate stage between the atom-galaxy and the galaxy-atom.

And finally the gravitational force sends you to the enter and the higgs field/dark entropy works outside the membrane.

And so we find then the proper formalism and parallelisms. I.e. the graviton has 2 spin but the Higgs outside is a 0 scalar. So happens to the gluon that has a light ‘graviton-like’ 2 spin and a heavy scalar highs-like 0 spin.

Of this conundrum only a correction is needed, regarding the graviton-neutrino which now is considered to be a 1 spin; but to correct that in meaningful ways we would need a huge leap into the formalism of quantum physics, which we avoid in purpose to show how meaning can be given conceptually with basic maths, when we upgrade our understanding of them.

While the thermodynamic dimotion *is not entropy but the clever molecular region, and resistance of the weak ud-beings to be packed in flocks to their death by excessive information or excessive entropy in the centre/membrane; and parasite as long as it lasts all other forces. So when you heat a system, gravitation misses the gaseous motion; magnetic fields are expelled by the Curie effect, beyond a Curie temperature. *

The game is just and the open ball is often left its own ‘space’ to cultivate its ghostly motions and forms – us.

Now of course, the ‘creationist view of egocentered humans’ about reality with man as the only sentient being with organic properties imposed by western cultures will have none of it. If taoism->buddhism would have spread as the substrata of our science and not yhwh the pantheist, organic sentient Universe that all of us, the masters of time-space models, consider the only rational explanation of reality would have prevailed, and man probably would have a longer future in this lost rock of the emptiness (Leibniz>Einstein>ls)

** **

** **

**St: INFORMATION IN PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.**

**The many consequences of S=T, stœps.**

As we increase the complexity of those papers in future revisions, we will keep ‘unwinding’ the many consequences of the Galilean paradox and the duality of motion and form. It is one of the most fascinating r=evolutions of 5D.

As the picture of the particle world changes completely when we accept that the stop=particle collapse = emission of information vs. wave=motion states are NOT spooky but ‘realist’ similar to what it happens ‘in any scale’ of reality where armies, fishes, and particles all alike, collapse in ‘still formation’ and spread when ‘moving’ – given the fact that all particles are ultimately ‘complex organisms of Planckton’ with the common ‘metabolic rate’ (Energy x Time) given by the H-planck constant…

So what is ‘spooky’ is the distortion established by huminds, when they try to convert the ‘stop and go movie’ of the quantum world into the ‘continuous’ movie of ‘measure’ in our world.

This property of ‘egocy’ – to confuse the necessary adaptation to the human scale of all other scales of reality, which we found also in our analysis of entropy as ‘disorder’ just because ‘smaller particles’ don’t want to give its existential energy to our scale (so indeed, there is always a quantity of energy the ∆-1 scale does not give us as work) – is one of the mantras of 5D. In most cases when something looks strange is either because creationist mathematics have got into the way and latter huminds have forgotten it was a mathematical artifact (lineal time born of the Cartesian frame that equalizes distances; Born probabilistic rule that creates a configuration space, latter creationist philosophers comment as real to get their quantum spooky theories, etc.) or because our perception is distorted by virtue of the asymmetric view through the scales of the 5^{th} Dimension; and our ‘elimination’ of not-perceived ‘stop states’, not perceived ‘dark spaces’ as in movies.

All this means that from the point of view of particles, there is no need to Lorentz transformations added to the mix. Which validates among many other equations, the Schrodinger’s wave equation as opposed to the Dirac relativistic one if we want to ‘feel’ as particles do.

The theme is fascinating, and for the non-specialist we can bring the example of our scale: does the Earth really move? We know it does, so it seems to think it doesn’t move is absurd. But we can use Ptolemaic more complex ‘extants’ and ‘epicycles’ to get the same ‘results’. In fact, Ptolemy was more exact than Copernicus. So If we consider then Einstein’s ‘human point of view’ the equivalent of Ptolemy’s point of view; Einstein is NOT an advance but a ‘regression’ into a more complex, less true view, which disregards how real particles perceive the Universe.

But Ptolemy also had its point because all ‘spaces are mental spaces’, constructs of the mind. So we humans live in a still Earth and that matters more than the Sun’s point of view, because for us in our scale IS REAL. We live and act in a still earth*. *So what we should choose? Obviously as humans a still earth is MORE REAL; but if we lived in the Sun, certainly the Earth would move, but it wouldn’t matter to us. The conclusion is that indeed motion is absolutely relative, but intelligent forms that want to perceive need ‘still mind-mappings’ and stop reality, reason why indeed particles stop to perceive.

We then come to the comparison between Schrodinger’s time independent, ‘’energy view’ vs. Dirac’s relativistic one, which ‘discovered’ new particles (antiparticles) that don’t exist in the ‘real view’ if we lived in that Universe.

** **

**Pentalogic of antiparticles. A sample case of the pentalogic method we shall use for physical systems.**

What this means will be dealt with when considering the nature of Antiparticles’ pentalogic; which is fascinating, and as we order those texts and ad in future revisions the maths, we shall develop it in depth:

*Space=form:* Antiparticles indeed live isolated in an absolute stop position, in magnetic traps at CERN, as ‘schrodinger’s cats’, *as a corpse that cannot move, as if a particle tries to be revived by motion* will collide with a living particle and die.

*∆+1: Scalar function:* Antiparticles have also an ∆+1 function, as the ‘galaxy’, the scale of the Universe similar to an atom looks in fact as an anti-atom with 90% of its mass on the halo. So we live in an ‘antigalatom’ and *the true balance between particles and antiparticles happens in the ‘antisymmetry between ∆º<∆+1 scale’. *

*Entropic view: *antiparticles are NOT real particles but states of death, which therefore are ‘STOP moments’ as all ‘dead corpses’ are ‘stopped’.

*Temporal view:* Antiparticles move to the past as all deaths are a past regression

*@-*mental view: This is represented mathematically, in a Feynman Diagram with Time and Space in orthogonal opposite coordinates as a line motion back in time.

Again, huminds which anthropic, self-centered might not be interested on the ‘pentalogic’ different ‘truths’ of the ‘Rashomon effect’ of absolute relativity, but reality is the sum of all monad’s points of view, and all have a part of the total truth of an event. How we shall go through the 4 papers on physics and entropy, space-time, mind and scale with pentalogic is simple. Because we want to highlight the organic nature of physical systems, we will keep the @-mental view for the end; that is the mathematics of it. We want to prove that a non-mathematical description of quality whys in physics not only is possible but necessary; and the ‘mirror’, the mathematics of it, just the last causal image – or the first one when we reverse the order and extract the properties for it. Again in ‘Physics and mind’ and ‘the Universe and mind’ we deal with the constant feed-back equation between ‘minds that mirror with languages the Universe’ and mirrors of SS-order that are projected on the Universe. Here from a book of penpal Penrose, which I corrected properly*: *In the left the strongest arrow of order in the ∆+1 TT-Universeó∆-1 SS-mathematical mind mirror tug of war that structures reality, the TT-universe comes first and determines as the larger whole with its 5D laws reality, but then the mirror-language that imitates reality is projected in the smaller territory of order of the being, a copycat of that image; expanding the information of the Universe into a smaller ∆-1 scale in which it exists. In this manner the Universe adds ∆±¡ scales of depth slightly different as the mirror is a simplified version of the whole. Then once the language has imprinted TT-motions with the image (right graph), they will be selected according to its ‘veracity’ to those laws. So creation is always a ‘back and forth’ feed-back between ∆±¡ scales, symmetric to the relative future to past to future motions of a worldcycle of existence as in the particle antiparticle game*.*

So to build up a true understanding of ANY phenomena, we need to analyze it in ∆-scale (ST), space (St), time (Ts), mind (SS) and entropy (TT). We will do so with ‘everything in physics’, as that is the way an advanced civilization would teach any subject; and then once the ‘quality’ elements are laid down we can use mathematics. And again, we can apply to mathematics the pentalogic mirror as we did when laying down the 5 ‘pentalogic’ views on gravitation (Newton->Poisson>Einstein; Lagrange->Hamilton) , as mathematics as all languages become inflationary – there are always more kaleidoscopic images than larger realities. So mathematics also mirrors the different ST-St-Ts-SS-TT perspectives; reason why to make sense of mathematical physics it is ALSO needed to apply pentalogic (or trilogic), as a ‘fractal principle’. As each part-point is a world in itself.

Finally in the analysis of the ‘varieties’ of species that are possible, a more sophisticated understanding of what the Universe allows and what does NOT (Laws of existential algebra) is needed. Here though the Universe is amazingly simple. We need only the ‘page’ of the stientific method, and the basic understanding of those symbols, because any mind can only operate in ∆±4 planes, of which the ∆±4 is the source of entropic motion with no information (gravitation for man), the ∆±3 scale of pixels of informative gauging perception (light for man), ∆±2 of ‘feeding bits’ (amino-acid molecules for man) ∆±1 seeds of reproduction and ∆º couples and identical particles for ∆+1 social evolution. It is an amazingly ordered game, and so only 2 ‘quantum jumps’ are allowed, meaning, systems might jump an intermediate scale, but NOT more as in death, ∆+1<<∆-1.

As usual we must remark that for 30 years, the few times I had tried to explain this to larger audience, the enormous jump of consciousness and perception of the beauty of the architectonical Universe overwhelms the reader, and his egocy (the feeling he knows nothing) makes him reject it as ‘out of my mind’. I wish he were right and I had instead of a better focused mirror, the imagination required to truly invent this 5D worldview, because then I would not be just a humind, soon to die, already with the mirror fast erasing its memory of what it has seen, but God itself. I might have a 3^{rd} trilogic eye-sense to have perceived all this but trust me, none came of my imagination. I recommend the reader who wishes to expand its verbal understanding of reality, man and the difference between thinkers and scholars that just repeat what others have thought, INSTEAD OF mirroring reality in a slightly different creative brain, to consult the best philosopher of modern History after Leibniz, Mr. Schopenhauer on his delightful pieces on ‘creation and thought’ in ‘literature and art’… Since he the titan of ilogic thought of the XIX c. and yet because he used the language of man, is ignored (or rather nobody in this digital age seems to understand a dot of it; though the two colossus of Physics, Einstein and Planck revered him as I do). Instead the eraseheads of the visual and digital age, went for Frege, Boole, Hillbert, the Wien school, Russell and all those simpletons who just tried to copy and translate with zero results the profound logic of verbal tenses, past, present and future into the limited ‘paradoxical capacity’ of mathematics to explain the *complex entanglements of the paradoxical ‘rashomon effect’ of pentalogic thought. *

Pentalogic IS NOT a fancy ad on, less real than Non-Euclidean geometry of fractal points. It is very real, because creation (see papers on Universe and mind, as the last paper we shall write, physics and mind with the highest level of 5D physics, that is, including the translation of mathematical equations is not yet done). What ultimately pentalogic means is that a single description as usual today in all stiences is not real. *This is very hard for the monologic anthropic self-centered man to understand. The more so to a physicist, who truly cannot put two words together since Einstein took 3 years to speak his first words ‘soup cold’ (which were his last, as he ate soup and died).*

**Adapting discontinuous scalar space-time to continuous single space-time.**

So after Galilean relativity didn’t understand the duality of motion and stop , in the ∆+1 human scale, but only care to measure it from the human perspective, the same phenomena was studied in the ∆-3 particle scale by Einstein’s special relativity, again unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form. So he merely went further with the obsession of measure, translating the stop-go effects *as if they didn’t exist. *

Particles travel only as waves, which are systems that reproduce information.

Then they stop, collapse and become particles, gauging information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop ‘ in the upper scale of the fifth dimension’ on top of the wave as pilot theory (Broglie) rightly understood, to ‘better’ gauge information as all systems do in the height dimension, as particles. Then they Go… they stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

**Trilogic on particles.**

A trilogic analysis is a ceteris paribus analysis of the 3 ‘topologies’ of an organism in a single scale (Ts-limbs/fields, ST-bodywaves, St-particle/heads), or its symmetric 3 ages or 3 ∆±¡ scales. For a full supœrganism to exist the 3 parts must co-exist in synchronicity, limbs, body and head, and using the ‘humanist method’ that takes man as the best known supœrganism, mirror of all other less well observed or less evolved ones (we wish we could say the same of History, but as the emergence of a new superorganism starts from afresh, the tail of lower scales partially erased this is not the case. As Nietzsche said ‘in individual madness is rare, in social institutions and nations is the rule; since the ccollective subconscious of mankind is childish). Back to physics (sorry the beauty and pleasure of 5D thinking is to have an isomorphic mind, as that of Joseph Knetch in ‘Das beangame’, which plays a violin sonata that suggests him an equation that becomes an expressionist painting of a wave of times 🙂 Back-back to physics… a Trilogic analysis of the zoo of particles of different ‘masses’, ‘energies’, ‘scales’ and ‘synchronicities’ shows then the existence of incomplete physical entities, ‘beheaded’ as 0-1-2 spin boson particles are; dismembered, as antiparticles are; ‘crazy thoughts’ of irregular topology as mesons who die as antiparticles are… aborted fetuses, as quasiparticles are; NOT particles but ∆-1 ‘expressions’ of a dimotional action as virtual particles used to communicate information between real particles are… ‘cellular particles’ as the light bosons trapped in the galatom well are, etc. etc.* ‘Te See them’ in all their organic glory*, according to possible variations of the fractal generator of 3±¡ topologies is a feast for the mind.

3 are thus the particles that encompass the entire zoo, to which we can add for good measure to complete its pentalogic , the SS-TT varieties:

**– ST-Body dominant ‘beheaded’ particles: Bosons:** There are particles that have no mass (light, neutrino), and hence never reach the ‘full stop’ state forming the more complex network structure of a particle, with an envelope and a singularity (that is a membrain) controlling an Existential energy, or ST-vital space to emit information. Those species are the lightest ones but they can indeed be trapped as light is in the potential well of the quark-massive atom, to perpetually move around as standing waves (electron nebulae of dense photons).

These are particles that are either in a wave-motion state or a particle-state, but NOT both at the same time. And so they become particles only when they die=collapse, emerge as parts of the ∆+1 state; as the potential well of the central black hole (w>C) or the proton which in 5D has also a Schwarzschild radius traps them.

They do have a very small ‘head’ – i.e. the photon state; which is localized as all heads at the ‘forehead’ (so the first waves of the light system behave differently than the train; or on top, as in the quantum realist view. As only Broglie understood for them to be ‘alive’ they must shycnronize as humans do with a second its brain (eye glimpse, thought, his body, beat-heart and his limbs, one second step). So *a particle in existence have 3 clocks in synchronicity, the wave clock, the particle clock and the potential field (external world from where it extracts its entropy), whose mathematics were masterly developed in the seminal paper of Broglie. Then the ‘Bohr gang’ came to lay waste to truth. *

**– St-Full, organic, particles dominant in heads: Fermions:** There are particles that do have BOTH, a body-wave and a particle on top gauging information. Those are more complex species, fermions, and so they have ‘rest mass’. They are mind-dominant, so they move slower, as they CO-EXIST together with body and head (wave and particle), so they are denser and as particle and wave have by virtue of the antisymmetry between the ‘3 elements of the being’ opposite functions, they cannot superpose, which is the organic expression of the abstract Exclusion principle (different signs in the commutator and all that parlance, any scholar delights in not explaining to you, as he had no idea what it ‘really’ means).

The interaction of those 2 types of particles then gives way to the fundamental Generator of particle events:

St(Fermion)<TS-boson>St-fermion

**ST: Its existential energy: **Ultimately both are complete particles that is they both do have ST-vital space that last, unlike, **Unstable particles, virtual particles: **there are many of those, literally ‘food for thought’, as they feed more efficient ones; and live short as they are just treated as ‘pixels to carry information’.

How then can we differentiate a stable lesser boson from a virtual one? According to the disomorphic laws of 5D timespace: a virtual particle, one ‘set to die’, as the antiparticle as the moment of your death, when you fast-track travel to the past, has NO present state, no duration, no ST-existential energy. Death, feeding, is always the same simple ‘Existential Algebraic equation’: Future<<Past: ST<<TT. The life direction is complete trilogic, Ts>ST>St.

For a particle to ‘transcend’ from seed/feed to existence, it must acquire a vital existential body-wave of energy, and run free from the emitter in a longer path.

**TT-entropic dying particles:** Here we can include also mesons that become the ‘gluons’ that feed the heavy TBC quarks of black stars (formerly black holes, see the cosmological 5D model). And any Partile-antiparticle ‘DUAL’ entity, hence without a trilogic development. While tri-logic systems (3 ages in time, 3 parts in space) are stable (UDU, DUD, BCB, CBC, light and ‘black’ neutrons & protons). 3 is the number of life and completeness, 2 the number of death with no present. So of course with no present time, all those events last very short, which is the essential distinction between the arrow of entropy and the arrow of existence and St-Kinetic energy. St-Kinetic energy processes is slower than a big-bang TT-death, even if both might seem similar for an external observer. One lasts, the other flares. So all those TT-Dying particles can be also treated as virtual particles sent to pasture and all particles can feed larger stronger ones, as in the chain of feeding, expressed by the ‘nuclear force’, which has the ‘mathematical stamp’ of all entropic processes (the negative exponential function of Yukawa’s 1^{st} simpler, more ‘truthful’ expression of the force); it lasts shorter, and has no spatial range. Seen, killed, fed…

**@-mind view: crazy particles. **Then there are crazy particles, which as fiction thought in the modern entropy age of mankind (where humans are in TT-mood, moving trying to keep up with the accelerated time of machines, and virtually crazy, believing in fictions, full of heated emotions, moving its brain in permanent freedom=chaos disorder), are fantaphysics, fictions of mathematical creationism crafted by the likes of Hawking (fiction evaporation of black holes by changing the arrow of information into a dimotion of entropy by a false ‘analogy’ with entropy in its in-famous equation of black holes, treated elsehwere). But Hawking equation when we CHANGE properly the ± symbol IS the description of a baby black hole NOT evaporating but feeding at fast speed. . If we write as Hawking does:

-Δ Mass X +Δ Temperature = Constant…

Black holes t increase temperature, getting hotter and diminishing mass, evaporating.

If we write: +Δ Mass x -Δ Temperature = Constant

Hyper-hot black holes will cool down, transferring heat to the surrounding star or planet, evaporating them, into a cosmic explosion, a Nova.

So what chooses those symbols?

*The Universe and its second thermodynamic law, which merely states that a hot object cools down and transfers heat to a surrounding colder environment. Thus, it is obvious that Mr. Hawking got his sign wrong, and arbitrarily decided the second law of thermodynamics was wrong and the black hole will evaporate.*

Had he not wanted to be the next Einstein (for that my friend you should discover a new dimension of time, a real one, not mending the ones that were correct, ‘if ain’t broken why fix it?’ ) he would have been content with the beautiful equation of baby black holes. As it is now, dead he is, dead might be mankind if they make them at CERN. So his ‘crazy black holes’ can be cured and become real with the proper sign of its dimotion, switching from entropy to information. The problem of physics are all those other particles bnorn of inflationary creationist mathematics of the simplest Euclidean form who ignore 5D rules, Non-Euclidean structure and will NEVER materialize beyond the ‘crazy thoughts’ of its fiction creators with its egocy – all those supersymmetric patterns that don’t even have a chance as Mesons do to show its head on the efficient Universe.

So that is the pentalogic of particles, but as the theme corresponds properly to ‘physics in scale’ (we will once all is laid down, reorder properly what is best to read in physics in space/time, scale or mind or entropy – as my mind works in parallel and has difficulties to put it in simple Aristotelian sequences – so all this will move to ∆-physics.)

A topological trilogic analysis then is more complex and we will keep it for the next review, and concerns the ‘form’ of the particle. And for this we must understand the process of wave collapse into particle, which starts as *all *emergences of a new scale of life, with the creation first of an envelope that constrains the motion of the ∆-1 parts. Again using the humanist method of comparison with biological sciences this is akin to the commonest form of life birth, when aminoacids where enclosed in bubbles. Then the bubble starts to compress the inner parts and finally it ‘collapses’ forming a singularity center. This is how new emergent planes of physical ‘life’ appear too. So for example, when charges move, they ‘create’ an emergent enclosure, called the magnetic field. But sometimes a membrane never collapses and so the particle never gets its center, as in the case of the magnetic field that forms not monopoles because the ‘charge’ monopole so to speak is already formed. So this is a symbiotic event that couples an unprotected charge on the move with a protective magnetic shield it ultimately generates (a pentalogic on magnetic field will show it can be from the point of view of its ∆-1 gravitational scale – relativity equations – show to emerge from the µ-1 scale). This is how quasi-particles (phonons, magnons, solitons, etc.) ‘show its head’.

*Such *particles are the envelope (graph) or group membrane of the wave, which moves and then we can write the mathematical equations to study its synchronicities that give the phase, group and front (trilogic again on waves, to be added to the paper ‘the mind of physics’), *the 3 parts of the wave in synchronous motion, its stability*. Particles thus enclose and in-form the wave – its body of existential energy that moves the particle. Hence we cannot with absolute precision measure both systems at the same time (uncertainty principle), as we shall either measure the envelope or the inner vital energy, but not both. However *this uncertainty diminishes as we move towards the fermion world, where both wave and particle co-exist and the particle dominates (so the speed is slower, the wave state thinner and the envelope dominates and finally forms a ‘still, center of mass’ that does not wobble like the wave does, but follows a lineal inertial path.*

**A special relativity effect that is real from the pentalogic view. **

Back to special relativity, a work of great merit due to its excellent ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ (: what is then real? We have seen it has been able to ‘detect’, thanks to Dirac, the ‘absolute stop positions’ of particles as dead antiparticles and this can bring delights of metaphysics if we reverse the humanist method, and apply its concepts to the question on how we die, as still ‘corpses’ with a maximal internal reversed motion in the brain, which goes back in time to the past, as those who have resurrected after brief deaths can testify rewinding our life back as the entire brain fires back the memories reprocessed by the central mind-region down the hypothalamus, in a final erasing and sensing of your life as you go down from this ∆+1 world into the ∆-1 world and wake up as a cell, and alas! There you have the monstrous insect you hated so much in your Stop-dreaming ‘virtual death’ nightmares of crawling insects. You are NOT going to die, you will be your antiparticle, but you wish you could break the ‘circle of reincarnations’ and have a true Samsara after Moska… Ok, promise to stop disomorphic thought… back to special relativity… (:

What is real-real, that is, have true effects both in the ∆-1 and ∆0 scales. We can compare this with the Galilean relativity duality of a moving Earth and a moving sun: what is a more complete description is obviously to describe both together as a dancing pair; that is the connecting distance between both is the same if we measure it from Earth and from the Sun; this is the ST relative body factor that pegs both and does not need to argue who is S-form and who is T-motion. So in the scalar trilogic of special relativity what is real is the ‘5D’ motion between the General relativity space-time scale (∆-1 gravitational scale) and the ∆o light scale (if we adopt as ∆o the photon view).

We had already looked at it from the point of view of ‘information’: light as it feeds on lineal neutrinos, which entangle them at the potential Broglie’s scale of v>c warp it also (pentalogic on light creation, neutrino theory of light of the same genius of the trilogic of masters of XX c. ‘simple=more truth’ physics, Planck>Broglie>Einstein):

In the graph a pentalogic drawing of light. We see the ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a -ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ space-time. And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the Lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single space-time (when it is a scalar space-time warped in the whole scales).

**Constancy of c-speed: endophysics**.

All this incredibly non-intuitive complex relativity maths to adapt reality to our ‘light>Electronic’ Mind-world moving at constant c-speed poises the question of what IS real… *In a world of monads all is real but at the same time mental, as we will argue in depth in the paper ‘Physics and Mind.’ * For a humind real will always be our measures. For the Universe at large in the scale in which those motions happens relativity is NOT real. If we were a particle we would see a much richer picture of particles stopping entangled with neutrino≈gravitons? Te talk to each other.

Why we are so sure? Besides the *even more complex 5D maths that prove it and will come last in our rewriting on those papers, there is the 5D method of truth: Disomorphism. *And the disomorphism of all other scales, including biological, social, and psychological thought shows an obvious truth: when you move you think worst and when you communicate you do it in parallel. Leibniz was 3 days in a chair to study its information. My ass is square (: Information, form becomes blurred because it is still, when we move. So to emit, or perceive information you stop. Te move and translate you go. Thus in the quantum scale electrons emit waves of light in relative stillness. And so there is NOT need in that ‘REAL level’ to make Lorentz transformations.

The universe is made of 2 STates, time=motion, and space=form. Yang and yin that combine in balance to create ∞ beings. So you can combine them T & S in 5 different forms:

S=T, the balanced state of existential energy that combine St-information (Potential energy) and Ts-locomotion (Kinetic energy), in constant SHM is the preferred balance of ‘present’ that lasts and iterates any organism, the state of survival.

Tt: internal and external motion or ‘entropy’ is one extreme, which brings death. That is the state of mankind today, caused by the fact the new species, machines move faster externally (cars, weapons) and internally ‘metal-minds’, visual images accelerate, disordering humans into a permanent ADD state. So millennials move fast and have disordered minds. At the end of that process entropy kills.

In the other extreme of absolute no motion, there is Ss, languages of the mind, seeds, pure, perfect information, enlightenment. A being in that state doesn’t move. The hypothetical Mind of God is such a being, because it perceives all what has existed, exists and will exist and repeat itself eternally as a block of time – a zero sum of fluctuations of the game of existence in space and time.

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.

** **

**TT-DIMOTION: ENTROPY**

**∆-1: weak force; ∆-1: neutrinos beta decay. ∆º: heat. ∆+1: entropic bangs: quasars and ****dark**** entropy the strongest force is feeding on entropy.**

We have established 4 Dimotions of physical systems in correspondence with the 4 forces of nature:

– ∂S-Entropy corresponds to the strong force from the point of view of the larger atom; its inverse ∫T-generation to the weak force; and in between §ð-perception of information to the gravitational vortex and its reproduction to the electromagnetic wave – but alas! the only dimotion physicists truly acknowledge, $t-locomotion does not respond to any of those forces specifically, or rather it is the effect of them all. So we need to study it in more detail to complete the correspondence of the 5Dimotions of exist¡ence and those of Nature. And since it is the ‘saint grail of physicists’, we did consider it in more detail in a previous paragraph.

The entropy function specifically is eˆ-x, as it is the fastest ‘growth function’ (and inversely the constant of decay, in which death jumps over the relative present state and dissolves the being). So unlike the electromagnetic ‘communicative’ force, Q qq/dd, the nuclear force, in its ‘simpler’ ‘first’ deductive version by Yukawa had a simple elegant formulae: **F = H*e ^{−λr}/r²**

The principle involved is that the force carried by particles has to be inversely proportion to the distance squared to account for the spreading of the particles over a larger spherical surface and must also be multiplied by an exponential factor to take into account the decay of the particles with time and hence distance.

This was a complete surprise for all physicists who were seeking as in the Weak ‘transformative, temporal process’ – not a force in space but a transformation in time, the usual equivalent to qq/dd communicative force as they have no clue to the first principles behind those formulae.

But what is the ‘decay constant’ H*? Te the surprise of all when empirically measured it turned out to be *the exact value of the two fundamental constants of the galatom, c, its constant of time-motion-distance and h, the constant of space-informative perception of physical systems, hc… So what moves and decays becoming a ‘pushing’ force is the entropic destruction of particles into its fundamental ‘minimal 5D’ units, h and c…*

Of course, today this Yukawa’s simple understanding on fundamental principles, of the nuclear force is ‘passe’ or rather was never realized as the vortices of Newton, we use to extract in the simplest form the Unification equation of forces is ‘passe’ and no scholar would care to understand why they are so precise and simple in its beauty on first principles, but rather would obsess into the little details of the forest, missing the first principles.

Classic entropy is the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, dimotion’ of temperature. But it only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas – by definition, the entropic, expansive dimotion of temperature; inverse to the dimotion of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered dimotion.

In terms of mathematical physics it means to dilate the spatial simultaneity (different paths) and reduce the temporal causality (Markowian statistical processes, without memory, as each quanta of time is non related to the next one0. Thus entropy IS clearly the inverse function of informative vortices, where causality in the cyclical motion towards the centre of the vortex is absolute.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

** **

**THE STUDY OF WORLDCYCLES OF MATTER IN TIME.**

– The study of the time worldcycles of the biggest supœrganism we know; the galaxy, which in the nested Universe includes 2 other smaller physical supœrganisms’ timespace worldcycles, those of atoms and matter. The 3 together conform to the general patterns of 3 scalar ∆±¡ worldcycles in all supœrganisms:

– The palingenetic worldcycle of particles and atomic matter, defined by quantum laws of the 0-1 time sphere.

– The life cycle of matter in entropic space, which is the thermodynamic cycle with 5 Dimotions/states.

– The worldcycle of matter in the Universe, which is the galactic cycle, of which the big-bang is just a local death.

In 5D organic physics the 3 worldcycles of matter have different properties, as in any supœrganism, which lives through 3 worldcycles. The palingenetic cycle is a ‘fast STage’ which ‘compresses’ an enormous amount of time in a short period. A palingenetic cycle is both a potential cycle of multiple ‘stories’=‘futures’ and a compressed cycle that jumps part of the process of evolution of a supœrganism ( “**ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny**“.)

So in the same manner the first palingenetic cycle of a biological organism accelerates following 5D metrics (SxT=C), the speed of evolution of a smaller ∆-1 organism, making gestation essentially a pure SS-time process; the evolution of forces into particles and atoms, whose speed we cannot truly perceive in detail is a fast process in pure time without ‘errors’. This extraordinary phenomena thus implies that many facts of quantum physics are NOT about spatial processes but temporal events.

It implies that the ‘laws of quantum physics in the 0-1 probability time sphere are equivalent to the laws of statistical mechanics in the 1-∞ space plane and the entire evolution of the galaxy represents one single story of all the possible paths of matter encoded in the ∞ stories of quantum particles.

Next though, the ∆0 human scale happens in the 1-∞ open entropic plane; where processes are spatial in the range of present synchronous time we humans can perceive directly. This implies that instead of probabilistic temporal laws we observe according to the S=T symmetry, statistical populations. Hence both scales are from the human point of view and its mathematical formalism different as relative time vs. space events.

Finally the 3^{rd} scale, the cosmological scale, is similar to the quantum scale in the process of creation of the galatom supœrganism – the extension of that equality however can be disputed, and we consider it in more detail in the study of the big-bang which represents the death of a supœrganism.

How it is born then a galaxy seems to be a matter of its ‘DNA-center’, aka frozen BCB stars, aka black holes; through the sudden ejection of a seminal ray of dark entropy associated to the transport of clouds of electronic light matter that conform irregular galaxies beyond the little known, likely strangelet halo

**THE ∆+1 COSMOLOGICAL WORLDCYCLES OF THE GALAXY. ITS 3 ±¡ AGES.**

of dark matter, according to the essential symmetry of all ∆=s=t=@ supœerganisms of the Universe:

**THE SYMMETRIES OF ∆ST**

The organic view of physics introduces logic and mathematical relationships of symmetry between ∆≈S≈T, deduced from the Paradox of Galileo. Systems are harmonic in scale, space and time and that is the reason they work in synchronicity. Quantitatively the theme intrigued theorists for very long. The proof is simple, as seen in Planck units, the non-human units of physics. We observe then the ∆=S=T symmetry of the perceived Universe, which is NOT the whole Universe but merely the Universe we perceive with light. So the density of scales, time duration and space distance we observe are the same, as *an electronic-light species limited in the 3 parameters by our c-speed ∆-3 information bit:*

* *

**Observable Universe ****Planck units Equivalents**

Age 10^{60} *t*_{P} 13.8 × 10^{9} years

Diameter 0.8 x 10^{61} *l*_{P} 10^{10} light-years

Mass 1.4 x10^{60} *m*_{P} 10^{80} protons

* *

Thus light ‘dies away’ in a diameter of 10^{60} quanta of time. after 10^{60} bits of information, each one taken place in those quanta, calculated as the time it takes to cross the distance of the electronic atom in which it is trapped as a dense photon of its nebualae means in space that is the distance we perceive of the Universe’s diameter. The coincidence thus is yet another quantitative proof that the big-bang is not a cosmic big-bang since its horizon of the observable universe merely measures the limit of light life.

Its symmetry of scale implies that mass *is the cosmological scale that ‘bounds together’ all the other forces of the Universe, which ultimately comes from the biological radiation of Plancktons *since in Einstein’s equations mass as the highest ‘plane of space-time’ of the galaxy inputs *every other force and element of reality we must conclude that the expansion in space and time has a parallel expansion in ‘depth of scale’ through the fifth dimension and this is what mass measures. A fascinating concept* that makes reason of EFE and some of its complex field.

**(TO BE CONT’ED)**

**COSMOLOGY****: WORLDCYCLES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: SCALAR BIG-BANGS**

“Astrophysic(ist are rounded (bastards), they are (bastards) from any point of view’ Zwicky (:

So how does the Universe looks as a relative fractal, whose purpose is to reproduce information and preserve it through cycles of time enacted by its ∞ Timespace Supœrganisms performing locally 5 Dimensional motions? Let us have a fast review of the cosmology of a fractal, organic, immortal Universe of ∞ 0-sum balances.

**Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe**

In the 1970s, Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists found the infinite fractal paradigm. There are distinct versions and theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future: In the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality. So first for the impatient, we shall have a fast glimpse to how a fractal Universe look when we add scalar elements to the ‘entropic big-bang’.

**Scalar entropic big-bangs in a balanced immortal Universe. The Galatom.**

In the fractal model a big-bang is the entropic death of physical matter. But the Universe is also scalar and it has information, a dimension of form, signified by the gravitational informative force, physicists ignore in their calculus of its expansion, happening in galaxies that balance the dark energy between them, we shall find both, balances of forces that make the Universe wobbling, and big-bangs and informative forces in multiple scales of the Universe, talking of multiple big-bangs balanced with big-crunches.

So how we shall correct big-bang theory to fit into the fractal view of the Universe? We dedicate many pages on the articles of astrophysics to that matter but let us just give you a prime:

Right, when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75-25% Balance of mass to dark entropy. Thus the fractal Universe is immortal. On the right its scales all suffer similar e=mc dual processes of warping through gravitational forces of cyclic momentum that create those galaxies, and expansive big-bangs of lineal momentum balanced in combined cycles of energy – the 3 conserved quantities of each fractal spacetime physical organism, which put together give birth to the 3 conserved laws of nature the Big Bang totally ignores – among many other known-known laws.

So the use of a fractal space and cyclical time dimotions fully accounts for the immortal Universe and its balanced 3 dimotions of space-time, conserved in its infinite reactions; energy, information stored in the cycles and frequency of those systems of angular momentum, whose minimal constant form is h, and lineal speed, conserved in the constancy of light.

Why those obvious facts of SOUND physics are then ‘reduced’ to ænthropic creationist big-bangs in a single plane of space-time despite evidence? It is the ego paradox: what the big bang does for science is a religious ‘closure” with man and its simplest mathematical lineal functions at its center, which added to the denial of organic sentient properties to physical reality allows to feel the high popes of science a sensation of absolute knowledge, as the religious person feels that all is known in the mystery of god – a word eerily similar to the lineal function of the big-bang ‘V=Hod’.

Big bang cosmolgy ignores gravitational informatve galaxies & dark matter & the scalar structure of the Universe reducing space-time to a single scale, and the cyclical nature of tme, we must correct the big-bang, which corresponds to the limit of a 5D complet theory of reality in a single ‘light’ space-time continuum.

The big-bang entropy-only theory of the Universe dismisses galaxies all together, as they are NOT expanding, and if the galaxies are NOT expanding, running backwards its present implosive system would mean a counter-effect to running backwards the expanding Universe. Backwards in a single time, the space between galaxies contracts, but the galaxies between space expand and a balance again is achieved: Since when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75%-25% balance of mass to dark energy.

Thus the inverse dimotion of gravitational information compresses dark energy into matter and balances the dimotion of expansive space between galaxies, describing a fractal immortal Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic dimotion of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mc^{2}

In next graphs, we resume the model of the fractal Universe in which each scale have similar big-bang deaths:

Scalar big-bangs that happen from Beta decays (right picture) that explodes nucleons into atoms, Nova that explode stars and maybe planets doing experimental big-bangs at home, to quasar black holes that give birth to new galaxies. All scales suffer similar e=mc^{2} dual processes of warping through gravitational forces of cyclic momentum that create those galaxies, and expansive big-bangs of lineal momentum balanced in combined cycles of energy – the 3 conserved quantities of each fractal space-time physical organism, which put together give birth to the 3 conserved laws of nature, which present Big Bang theory ignore. Instead a fractal space and cyclical time dimotions fully accounts for the immortal Universe and its balanced 3 dimotions of space-time, conserved in its infinite reactions; energy, information stored in the cycles and frequency of those systems of angular momentum, whose minimal constant form is h, and lineal speed, conserved in the constancy of light.

In the center we see a map of the Galaxy, which just recently showed to have two lobes similar to those of the first electronic orbital of a Hydrogen atom born in self-similar fashion in the quantum scale. In the left side we see the background radiation that is supposed to come from the Big Bang 13 billion years ago, but HAS in its center the exact 2 lobes recently found above the black star. This came as a surprise.

Above, the local explanation of the background radiation, which is a local measure, hence must and can be explained by local causes in the galaxy: any moon M.A.C.H.O., (Massive Cold Halo Object); that is, a quark nugget of heavy quark matter or a similar black hole that has eaten the mass of a moon will produce the exact same background radiation by gravitational red-shifting. Thus as moons are the commonest objects, we can talk of primordial black holes and/or strangelets as the local, ‘present’ cause of the radiation. Since epistemology always favors a local ‘present’ solution far more sound experimentally than a ‘derivation’ from a non-measured experimental past in a non-measured larger region (the cosmic big-bang whose temperature ‘comes from the past’, reduced by a lineal equation and is extended hyperbolically to the non-measured entire Universe), it follows the fractal big-bang, is sounder. So what physicists call the cosmic big-bang likely does not exist, as the limit of scalar big-bangs we soundly measure are quasar big-bang.

Finally French astronomers tabulated for them a 15–20 billion year cycle which explodes central black holes, explaining the hyper-abundance of Helium in the center of galaxies. So a galaxy has a 15 billion years cycle in an older immortal Universe, since the dimotion of information that shrink energy into mass in galaxies balances the entropic ‘cosmic electromagnetic’ repulsion of dark energy. Interesting enough if we reduce a quasar big-bang of 15 billion years, with 5D metric, accelerating its time clocks as we reduce size in space: $ x ð = K, it reduces 15 billion years to 15 minutes (: the exact duration of a beta-decay neutron Big Bang.

We falsify the cosmic bang with experimental & epistemologic known proofs distorted by cultural reasons that make it a pseudo-religious dogma of the worldly religion of physics – to make entropic weapons in a military society- and the western creationist religion of most founding fathers of physics, with its lineal Abrahamic time views & anthropic beliefs of man at the center of reality reflected in the lineal, created out of nothing cosmos.

**Cosmic vs. Quasar big-bangs**

EóM (whereas c is the constant of speed of each Universal scale, c for the galaxy, not necessary so for other scales) is dual and there are scalar big-bangs from beta decay to quasars and maybe beyond is certain. So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of big-bangs, that of a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are similar in form.

Te play ball with cosmologists we could justify the big-bang in 5D since if we accept our limit of light perception as the limit of the Universe (cosmic horizon); then the ¬=@=S=T=∆ symmetries between spatial range, time aging and scalar density of populations all fit within the ‘magic number’ of 10^{11} elements for most super organisms of reality. So the symmetry also happens in the ‘limited perception’ of the cosmos:

Most galaxies have 10^{11} stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×10^{10} and 6.43×10^{10 }*sun masses.* *And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 10 ^{11}galaxies.*

*So we could say that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).** And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe. But that is just the astounding beauty of pentalogic, where the 5 Dimotions/elements of reality are in balance. So for the limits of our entropic perception (¬=@), we observe similar quantitative and qualitative limits for S-patial population, T-ages within our ∆-scales. But a more profound understanding of those limits considers that the local perception of a few galatoms is just a very reduced quantity of the whole number of galatoms of the next hyperscale of the Universe that should be of zillions of them, and all of them living as Protons and black holes without evaporation do an immortal time.*

*The immortality of the Universe indeed becomes evident as Protons are immortal and black holes are also immortal without evaporation, once we put properly in place the dimotion of time of Hawking’s awesomely beautiful equation as those of the birth of a black hole into its gargantuan future, NOT of its entropic death=evaporation to the past. *

** **

**The symmetry of scale between the 2 families of mass: uds, strange and bct, top decuplets. **

The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe is a simple model that astrophysicists would find obvious, if they were not under the straightjacket of lineal time.

Since the question to resolve is the cause of the background radiation, once the expansion and implosion of vacuum and matter balanced each other, as 3 lineal dimensions of vacuum space, packed into a single unit of mass, one had only to follow the epistemological laws of truth in science and *don’t cheat them looking into the past or the infinite for explanations that must be found here and now. *

If you see a patient with 37 degrees you look for the internal activity of its cells that cause that temperature, you don’t tell him 37 degrees is his temperature because he has been cooling out since its birth when it was 37 billion degrees hot. He will think you are mad and yet that is the madness of our physicists. Alas, I found to my surprise that there is an object, which exactly produces that radiation at that temperature. A black hole that produces a red shift radiation whose temperature varies according to its mass. But 2.17 k degrees is exactly the temperature a black hole of the mass of a moon, the commonest size planetoid of the galaxy has. Ergo it is the obvious cause of the radiation, observed in the ‘galaxy only’, as we don’t measure it outside.

The galaxy is a supœrganism, which as all supœrganisms requires an homeostatic temperature that favors the balance and activity of its main ‘functional’ organic part – in the galaxy black holes. So its background temperature is produced by ‘Moon M.A.C.H.O.S’. That is quark matter black holes that produce a red shift radiation whose temperature varies according to its mass. But 2.17 k degrees is exactly the temperature a black hole of the mass of a moon, the commonest size planetoid of the galaxy has. As species come in 3 sizes, we consider the existence of moon MACHO black holes, Star nova larger black holes made of BCB heavy dark atoms and top quark gigantic black holes. And as the larger black hole is colder; those 2 larger species can take advantage of the homeostatic temperature of the ‘blackground’ radiation to fuel their activity.

Regarding the isomorphism of that temperature, though there are moons with slightly different weights everywhere, fundamental particles as electrons, quarks or black holes are, do have an exact mass as they are more perfect, quasi-identical. So when a primordial black hole (the smallest type theoretically consistent but not yet found, as physicists haven’t thought of them to solve the background radiation’s origin) eats a moon planetoid just burps out the excess of matter once it has reached its stable size-form. So we are in a galaxy which has millions of those smallish black holes or a similar ‘nugget of ultradense quark strange matter’ producing that radiation. In fact galaxies are organisms whose purpose – physicists are coming to accept it, is to produce black holes and quark dark ultraheavy matter, which is everywhere. So this is part of the process. In the same manner cells are systems whose ribosomal ‘stars’ produce RNA and DNA that migrate to the center of the galaxy – a system that reproduces ultradense quark gravitational particles, strangelets of dense strange quarks, black holes which have the same density-mass of top quark stars. The obvious conclusion is that planets and stars are the ‘ribosomes’ of the galaxy, and primordial black holes or similar strangelets of low temperature, its ‘mitocondria’ system.

Yet as the organic paradigm is not considered, astrophysicists cannot try to describe the galaxy as an organism, just an object with ‘Ts-speeds’ and TT-entropic processes.

While mathematical creationism as its philosophy of science makes them extremely happy tinkering with the bizarre analysis of black holes as mathematical entelechies without substance, since it convinces them that only equations exist – as in the case of the Copenhagen absurd ‘observer’ interpretation and ‘probabilistic’ concepts that fail to understand the temporal, palingenetic S=T equivalence of the o-1 sphere of quantum physics considered next.. Einstein revealed against both creationisms and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales. The next graph shows that ** economic, hylomorphic** Universe, made of

*known matter and symmetric forms*– 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it:

In the graph a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the eperimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic dimotion of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense *of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries, *between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy* defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’,* the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy* positive *toplets (TTT^{++}-quarks and *TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).*

What is the answer of a big-bang lineal St-upid cornered by so many errors, when you show him the 5D model, which just orders properly the same data using the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space? ‘It cannot be that simple’, even if physicists invented the lineal big-bang in first place because their ideas about ‘lineal time’ were too simple.

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time and that is a religious dogma for them

**RECAP. **In the fractal model a big-bang is the entropic death of physical matter. But the Universe is also scalar and it has information, a dimension of form, signified by the gravitational informative force, physicists ignore in their calculus of its expansion, happening in galaxies that balance the dark energy between them, we shall find both, balances of forces that make the Universe wobbling, and big-bangs and informative forces in multiple scales of the Universe, talking of multiple big-bangs balanced with big-crunches.

**∆+1: The quasar big-bang galactic cycle**

The life-death cycle of the central black hole of Galaxies that explodes into quasars and forms back its bar, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleo-synthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the big-bangs ages are properly the ages of the galaxy; without all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain why the large scale universe has nothing to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. We do not need to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones known, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo.

In the graph the ‘big-bang’ properties local to the galaxy can be explained by the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe…

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 dimotions of time. So why nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? For all the wrong reasons – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

In the graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum, compensate this expansion: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.* Experimental facts tell us **we must* accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies. *So both together create an immortal Universe. *Since in Philosophy of Science we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

* *But Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.

Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.

If the cosmic big-bang had sound experimental data, of course, we would accept it. As it does NOT contradict 5D physics. It would just validate a larger scale worldcycle. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it. The scalar big-bang death processes of matter in all planes, from beta decay to galaxies is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales. But the cosmic one is not proved. So since all big-bangs are mimetic we reduces the scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making Einstein’s EFE, local field equations for the Light-space time of the galaxy (reason why c is constant).

Fact is as the graph of SCiAM shows the full quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle and we have found *galaxies in all its stages*. Thus by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=Mc^{2}, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the *big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.*

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

The natue of the =galactic big-bang’ recently received a boost from astrophysics, as we have discovered that most of the stars of the galaxy formed in the ‘electronic nebulae’ during the initial 1 billion years. We study in many other articles the whole ‘organic cyclical theory’ of quasar big-bangs, whose first mathematical expressions were considered by Hoyle – the old proponent of a steady state Universe, anathema of the Big-bang ‘religion’. It came this years 2019 as a surprise that the ‘galatom’ is mostly static – that is, once the electron nebulae is formed there is hardly any new formation of ‘star-points’ on the erlectronic nebulae. And when this happen takes place with enormous violence and synchronicity, as it happens in an atom, when there is a capture of an electron by the nuclei. Moreover the atom suffers a constant spiral torsion on the ‘trajectory of the electron nebulae around its central proton hole, as it is the case recently found in the spiral torsion of galaxies. 5D future astrophysicits will find an enormous field of similarities comparing atoms and galaxies – already they use photonic models to study the central region of stars.

**THE 3±¡ **** AGES OF THE GALAXY. ITS WORLDCYCLE.**

When dealing with astrophysics in a future world of stience, there should be no difference with any other stience of scalar organic exist¡ences.

The principle of conservation of energy would be derived of the principle of conservation of time, and its 3 standing points that maximize conservation, the point of reproduction in balance between temporal energy and spatial information, Si=Te; and the two maximal points of Si (Max. social evolution) and T¡. Maximal motion, define the 3 ages of physical organisms, called states in matter, as in any other system of nature. Those 3 ages would be also studied in cosmology as the origin of the ages of Galaxies shown in the H-R graph. And its s=t symmetry in space, the ternary principle of diversification of species, Max. S < S=T > Max. T will also be considered. From them, we can trace the existence of galaxies and its different forms, as any other organic system of the Universe. Let us then do so in a brief treatise on the ages of galactic life.

That first course on astrophysics would need little mathematical physics, but on the organism of the galaxy and its life-cycle, in which human beings are inscribed. Such a humble world would realize ‘man is just a mush over a lost rock in the corner of the milky way’ and aware of its cosmic nonsense, would likely preserve its exist¡ence, the only reason d’etre, much longer that it seems bound to do. For a galaxy is just an organic system, akin to a cell of the larger scale in its life properties, quantitatively similar to an atom in its algebraic properties, of a larger hyper-universe, and this plane a speck of dust turning around a sun-like photon. And yet even if the quantitative analogies between the galaxy and the atom are perhaps the most astounding mathematical feat of 5D, we shall here just consider that introductory course of a future high school.

On the nature of the hyper-universe little could be said, unlike present cosmology of hyperbolic egocy bigbang theorists. Regarding the big-bang, the name of the theory has been changed long ago. Now it is called the little bang theory, as its ‘scale’ is that of galaxies, similar to a double beta decay of a neutron, and *certainly not the central part of astrophysics, as nobody studies obsessively the death of an organism, which is what a little bang means, but the life of it, and its organic inner structure that peg together its parts into a whole.*

**The 2 Ages of Galaxies’ worldcycles.**

* In the graph, the life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3±¡ ages, evolving from a young, extended nebula into an old small swarm of top black holes of dark matters that explodes in a quasar (Little bang of dark Entropy and quark matter), astrophysicists confuse with the explosion of the whole Universe. In between, galaxies live a long, mature, cyclical steady state, fluctuating every 14 billion years between its spiral and elliptic form, while absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central swarm of Top Holes.*

Because the galaxy is an ∆St system with ∆-organic and quantitative, numerical properties, S-topological ones and temporal dimotions and ages, the structure of a galaxy can be compared according to the homologies of the disomorphic method in its self-similarities with the ‘elemental’ units of each scale of reality – with a quantiattive atom of the ∆-1 scale – hence the name galatom for such dual analysis and with an organic ∆0-cell of the human scale, as a galacell, with a central DNA of social swarms of top quark stars and a protein-like membrane or halo of quark, dark matter, made of energetic strangelets *which the mind egocy paradox denies to all species. Since man only gives its most cherished organic properties to species of its scale, as its mind perceives maximal information in our scale, from a self-centered point of view.*

*As in all other sciences, ‘ænthropic’ humans project its 3 fundamental errors into cosmology:*

*– The anthropic errors of denying life nature to all other species; the creationist error of denying hilomorphism and scalar parts to point-particles and black holes, which are made of substance that can only be according to its density and gravitational attraction of top quark holes and bcb atoms.* SO their proper name should be top quark ‘frozen stars’, as Einstein named them, NOT black holes; a name long dismissed in our ‘future high school’ course.

*– And ‘entropic’ simplifying errors (lineal time, entropy as its only dimotion, and entropic theories of reality). So they confuse also in the galaxy, the ‘death’ moment with its birth (quasar, big bang), and , the main errors of astrophysic )*.

Thus, the ages of a galaxy in its time worldcycle are the same 3±¡ ages of in any other space-time supœrganism. Each of those ages can be further subdivided according to the trinity laws of the fractal generator *in 3 sub-ages and have 3 different Space-time origins*.

Thus, a galaxy can be created by 3 different processes, proper of the trinity of reproduction:

*-¡: Seminal conception:* Galaxies are created by the customary 3 types of Max. St, ST & Max. Ts reproductions:

-Max. Te: Reproduction by an excess of entropic Energy:

A galactic Little-bang quasar catalyzes the evolution of gas into stars. This birth is similar in ∆-1 to a star ‘Novang’ (former nova 🙂 that catalyzes also the creation of stars or a hypothetical ∆+1 Universal Big-bang that catalyzes the creation of galaxies, but of which all proofs are hyperbolic exaggerations of Little Bangs.

– Si=Te: Reproduction by balanced ST-evolution: Palingenetic conception, when the informative nucleus of Top quark holes of a giant mother-galaxy emits a huge jet of dark, quark matter that ends into a baby galaxy.

– Max.Si: Informative reproduction: Social evolution of energetic gas that creates complex star structures.

*-S≈T. Maturity/reproductive age. *Galaxies enter their steady state of reproduction, in which its spiral structure matures: stars gather in social groups and at its center a Top quark hole, the informative nucleus, structuring its body of toroid, cyclical paths of stars.

Galaxies then mutate back and forth, from spiral into elliptical vortices of mass, feeding on interstellar gas, in a cycle that creates and destroys its spiral bar every 13 billion years in a quasar *Little-bang that renews the Galaxy and coincides with the parameters of the cosmic Little-bang of continuous models of space-time.*

*– Max S; information age: *In their 3rd age, once galaxies exhaust their interstellar gas, their central Top quark holes digest their star bodies, becoming globular, spherical forms with a hyper dimension of informative height, till they exhaust all their star Entropy. As dark galaxies, without the drag limit of c-speed caused by their electronic and radiant matter they now accelerate as pure top quark holes up to z=10c; forming invisible, complex networks of dark matter.

As all systems that go through 3±i ages of evolution, the final stage after its 3^{rd} informative age has ‘2 solutions’, death and reversal of form into Entropy or ‘transcendence’ into a higher super-organism, communicated by the language of information of the system (so insects evolved into successful anthills while others become extinct and humans evolved into societies while most other mammals became extinct). Thus:

* – (∆-1):* Some galaxies die as quasars, becoming again according to the inverse symmetry between the 1st and 3rd youth and old age of all systems, irregular galaxies that will feed a new cycle of galactic creation. So irregular galaxies are both the youngest and oldest forms of the Galaxy, a fact that still confuses cosmologists.

* – (∆+1):* And those with a higher quantity of informative black holes in their nuclei evolve socially as cannibal galaxies, forming galactic networks in cellular groups that evolve socially into the large scale structures of the Galaxy. Their central Top quark Holes grow, swallowing radiant matter at growing speed, and perhaps evolving with many other galaxies into a cluster Galaxy, of which there is no enough experimental evidence.

Thus, we differentiate the Little-bang or death of any scale of the Galaxy from a Little-banging or reproduction and self-organization of the present Galaxy and a 3rd age or Little-crunch, followed by a Little-bang or a process of emergence into a supœrganism, which creates a generational cycle for any fractal space-time in 3±i ages.

*The Huge Galaxy and its galactic, fractal Little bangs.*

Since the age of a galactic cycle, 13 billion years, is the same that the age of the cosmological Little-bang, as Fred Hoyle affirmed, the cosmological, continuous Little-bang might be the sum of all galactic, fractal Little-bangs and the Huge Galaxy is not expanding as a whole. It will exist in a steady state, in which the knotting of space into mass by galaxies would compensate the expansion of mass into dark Entropy in the interstellar vacuum, which causes its expansion. Further on Little-bangs at the lower galactic scale, caused by the quasar explosions of its central Top quark holes when they break their bars every ±14 billion years should be the origin of the second proof of a cosmic, continuous Little-bang – *the excessive quantity of helium in the galaxy* – found precisely in bigger quantities on top of the central Top quark hole. Finally, background holes born of planetoids would redshift radiation at 2.7 K. Thus a fractal quasar Little-bang provides the same experimental proofs and better theoretical explanations, eliminating the multiple contradictions of the cosmological Little-bang.

Thus, a *steady state* theory of the Galaxy combined with a fractal theory of multiple Little-bangs/quasars, as it was reformulated mathematically by Fred Hoyle, in which the multiple, constant Little-bangs of galaxies into quasars are responsible for helium formation, redefines the Galaxy as a huge fractal scale of cellular galaxies in eternal balance with the expanding space, where light devolves back into 10 c dark, gravitational Entropy and dark Entropy warps into light by redshift and dark matter into galactic matter, imploding space:

*T (dark Entropy expansion) = S (dark, quark matter implosion)*

Such balance, coupled to the constants of proportion between the energetic and informative elements of a complementary system, explains also, without appealing to the magic anthropic principle, the universal balance between matter and radiation, whose probabilities otherwise are null. Indeed, why matter and Entropy are in balance in the Galaxy at this exact moment in time, in a proportion of 1 to 3 (as mass is bidimensional and radiation 3-dimensional) if their relationship is dynamic, changing all the times, with Entropy winning the battle and expanding faster?

The answer is: because the Galaxy and any partial system within it exist in 3 to 1 balances between their Entropy and information/mass and when those vital constants of balance break the system ceases to exist.

*Recap*. Galaxies live through the 3 same ages of any space-time, born as seminal flows of dark Entropy and electromagnetic radiation, ejected by giant galaxies that condensate into quarks dark matter and an explosion of electronic forms and the creation of atoms and stars, start the reproductive age that will collapse into a central Top quark Hole, back to the original quark-gluon soup that gave it birth.

While the study of the different Ðisomorphism should go on line 3, as I was looking to old 2 decade files of the first self-published book with 5D physics (physics of time, now ‘extinct’ unless some ‘Nobel prize’ or university kept it), I found this funny graphs, on the duality and ternary symmetries that give birth as usual in all systems to the 6 main species of ‘female ternary space-time species’ and ‘male ternary space-time species’, to use the organic jargon I have always preferred and of course made T.Œ unpalatable to any reader in the past (-:

**Galaxy in time: from nebulae to quasar little bangs.**

*After the Little-bang, the Little-banging reproduced and evolved the huge Galaxy in 3 Horizons of growing complexity: the age of atoms, celestial bodies and galaxies.*

If we study the huge or cellular Galaxy in time, we differentiate in its evolution the 3±i ages of any space-time:

∆-1* (Past): The Little-bang conception* of the Galaxy, starting from a first informative cell of Planck density was also the death and gravitational Little-bang of a previous Universal singularity, a seed of ultra-dense quarks that transformed its inner, informative cyclic dimensions into an external, bidimensional sheet of dark Entropy: M(i)=e/c2. It was the age of the simplex time dimotions.

–*Life dimotion, steady state:* Then the Galaxy suffered an informative process of reproduction, self-organization and social evolution, the *Little-banging*, or age of the Complex Dimotions divided in 3 ages – the atomic, stellar and galactic age, which should end in:

– *Informative, 3rd age:* A Little-crunch back into a new hyper-dense singularity that would restart the cycle in a new Little-bang.

– ∆-1 (Future): *New Little-bang* and *Conception. *The future explosion of the hype top quark Hole will again create a bi-dimensional sheet of gravitational space-time where matter will again evolve, as quarks form nucleons that decay into atoms and dark Entropy warps into light, the new components of the future baby Galaxy…

Let us consider those ages and its ternary sub-ages, *according to a law of the fractal paradigm, known as fractal differentiation:*

*‘Any event or form of reality can be divided into ternary or dual events and spatial forms of a lower spatial scale or shorter time duration’*

This law structures fractal self-repetitions according to 3 ages and 3 Non-Euclidean structures in any scale. Thus it can be applied to study the 3 ages of the Galaxy and for each age, its 3 sub-ages. Since we have already study the fractal Little-bangs (birth) we shall start with the 3 ages of the Little-banging:

__I Universal Age: Particles, Atoms and Molecules.__

* – Birth: Max. T: Fractal Little-bang of Beta decays.*

The Little bangings of primordial particles: After being scattered by a gravitational wave of dark Entropy at 10c<100c speeds, quarks evolved into nucleons and suffered fractal, expansive quantum Little bangings – beta decays – creating protons and electrons, later self-organized into atoms, molecules and more complex social structures, till giving birth to galaxies.

*3 Atomic Ages of matter states:*

Those molecular structures can also be studied with the law of 3 ages, according to which the 3±i states of matter respond to the dominant dimotion of future information:

* – (∆-1): Plasma or conception state of matter*. The plasmatic state occurs at speeds closer to light, in a state in which atoms are split in primordial particles, free protons and electrons, which emit enormous quantities of radiation and sub-particles. Thus plasma is matter in its seminal state, (∆-1).

– Max. T: The *gaseous* state is the classic *energetic state* of atoms or diatomic molecules with max. movement, spatial volume and min. formal density.

– <=>: The molecular state of balance between Entropy and information is the *liquid state*, which according to the law of harmony and maximal existential force (S=T max exi), is *the reproductive state* of matter. For example, liquid water and mercury dilute all other atoms of similar weight that merge and evolve into more complex carbohydrates & metal forms: carbon-life or metal alloys. 90% of a human body *is liquid* water, with diluted, energetic gas (oxygen), and solid particles (proteins, DNAs, RNAs) to store and trans-form information. Since solid is:

– Max.S*: Solid, informative state* of min. movement and max. form & mass density that creates the most perceptive=informative, inorganic structures: crystals.

– (∆+1): Finally, the *super fluid (helium) and boson states (heavier atoms) are *the highest form of molecular evolution, because it combines the properties of solids with maximal order, liquids with max. reproductive, combinatory capacity and gases with max. Entropy. Thus, it gives birth, according to the organic, social dimotion of Evolution of all systems to a new type of macro-organisms, with a central, hyperbolic nucleus of super fluids and bosons… the:

__II Age: S≈T: Nebulae, stars and planets.__

In the next stage, those states of matter evolved socially aggregating into macromolecular systems* that combine 2 states of matter,* which act as the dual energetic/ informative elements of the complementary system. Those cosmological, macro-molecular systems seem to us static, because their existential cycles are slow (Max.T=Min It). But they are also evolving in 3 ages:

*-Max T=Min S:Youth. *Nebulae are the youngest, commonest, biggest (max.T), less dense, simpler (Min.S) physical systems, extended around and between galaxies. Their atoms exist in energetic plasma and gas states.

*– S≈T: *Stars are molecular macro systems, existing in the plasma and liquid states. Complex cosmology considers informative, cold, liquid and super fluid states dominant over energetic states, which Simplex Physics, based in a single Entropy dimotion prefers, as Entropy is also easier to detect. Yet if we could reach the center of a star, we will find lower temperatures and super fluid systems. Since it is a basic tenant of Complex physics that informative, hyperbolic systems are more static and cold, able to create order and focusing formal mappings that gauge the external Galaxy.

*– Max T=Min S: *Planets are systems that exist in liquid and solid states. They follow the Inversion Law, Max. T->∞=MinS->0. So giant planets exist in liquid states and smaller planets exist as solids. They are ferromagnetic planets; and we live in one of them. Again, fractal space-time theory favors cold, solid, informative states for those centers. So we affirmed that the planetary core should be a crystal; and their youth should be colder than scientists predicted. Indeed, recently we found that Neptune might have a solid diamond crystal in its center and the Earth probably has an iron crystal with a final Uranium core. And we have also found, studying zircons that planets cooled off much earlier than expected. Hence informative life also started earlier.

– *∆+1: Pulsars and Holes *are systems with a solid iron crust and a super fluid core of strange quarks.

Pulsars represent the final, informative age of celestial bodies, which might evolve further into Top quark Holes, species belonging to the gravitational Galaxy beyond our light world, with higher form. Those holes become through social evolution the informative, hyperbolic centers of galaxies, triggering the next stage of evolution of the Galaxy:

__III Informative, Age and death: Max.S: The age of Galaxies.__* *

*-From left to right: A galaxy with a flat star body and a central brain, occupied by Top quark Holes with a hyper-developed dimension of informative height, perpendicular to the galactic body.*

*-Different biological curves of stars reproduction.*

*– A region rich in atomic Entropy where those stars are born.*

*-A galaxy with an organic form that remembers a ray fish*

*– A giant galaxy, which re=produces a seminal jet of matter, giving birth to a younger galaxy.*

*The 3rd age of the Galaxy started once galaxies*, with central, informative top quark holes and star bodies that feed on interstellar gas socialized in galactic networks with the 3 canonical topologies: Lineal walls, spiraled systems and cyclical, globular forms and disks.

Those 3 galactic networks structure a mature Galaxy that shows in computerized models a surprising similarity with the discreet networks of a living tissue.

As the Galaxy gets older, if it is a cellular structure it will warp further, creating *a hyper top quark hole* of Max.Informative, Planck’s density in its hypothetical center that should become its DNA-like center controlling and feeding in a hyper-vortex of galaxies.

We could consider 2 cellular hypotheses:

∆+1: The Galaxy evolves socially as it becomes a cell of a hyper-Galaxy from a bigger ∆-scale…

∆-1: Each cell is an island Galaxy in itself that will finally collapse around its informative center, as stars do in elliptical galaxies, feeding its Hyper-Top quark Hole in the Little-crunch. Then the Galaxy will die in a new Little-bang will initiate a new cycle. In this case the cell-Galaxy is self-similar to a bacteria, in as much as it is a single cell organism.

We seem to be moving towards the steady state, longer period of existence either because we are atoms-like of a huge Galaxy or because we are in a 2nd age that will latter implode back. Because the degree of curvature of the Galaxy is given by lambda which is near equilibrium, counting the implosive action of galaxies, and the expanding intergalactic space, both hypothesis (a gas-like huge Galaxy or a cell-like system are possible.

__The Huge Galaxy will reduce those ages to galactic phases.__

Yet if cells are atoms of a huge Galaxy none of those ages will happen, as galaxies would be the last ‘cosmic structure’, which we can perceive with certain precision.

In Einstein’s general equations of space-time, the cosmological constant that measures the Entropy of vacuum: l defines also the warping of the Galaxy, which can acquire our familiar 3 topological forms: a simple plane,-sphere proper of a young age; a cyclical, steady state toroid or a convex, informative form (its Little crunch, final state). Now l is positive, and the Galaxy seems to be plane but so close to zero that the hypothesis of a stationary Galaxy takes force. Yet again we cannot measure with enough time latitude to know if it changes and it will *diminish in the future it will become negative, inverting the *geometry of the Galaxy and warping it, into a final Little crunch.

Since ‘l’ can be considered the length of the tachyon string or minimal action of the gravitational Galaxy in terms of those minimal fractal parts, the thesis of a constant lambda and steady state huge Galaxy is reinforced by self-similarity with the constancy of ‘h’ in the quantum world.

In such case, there should be only quasar-like Little bang of galaxies, short of cosmic beta decays and the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation should be applied only to galactic space and the quasar cycle, initiated by a gravitational, inflationary Little-bang of dark Entropy, followed by a Little-bang of electromagnetic radiation, which quiets down, and finally implodes into gluon creation of quark matter.

Such humbler, more realistic analysis of the origin of the observables of astrophysics will reduce all relativistic analysis of the 3 ages of space-time to processes within the galaxy, born as the explosion of a hyper-black hole of top quarks, latter exploded into a fractal Little-bang of beta decays. We would then be in the 3rd age of such galaxy, organized already by a central black holes. Since t*he space-time of our galaxy is an implosive vortex of information.*

Indeed, we are in a Gödel Island-Galaxy, in a vortex of information called the Milky Away. Then the Energetic Galaxy should be considered irrelevant to us, only applicable to intergalactic, expanding space, because we would exist in the 3rd informative solution, the vortex of the galaxy and that is why the dimotion of time in humanity is an informative dimotion, not an energetic one. And that is why the sciences of information, of biology not those of Entropy should dominate our analysis of scientific phenomena – even if the awesome Entropy of physical beings might impress the simplex mind.

*Recap. *We can order the evolution of the whole Galaxy as any other organism in time through 3 ages each one divided in sub-ages: the young, energetic Little-bang, probable death of other Galaxy, the steady, reproductive state in which it seems to be now and the Little-crunch that will happen as the initial momentum of the gravitational strings slow down to under c-speed. Then we shall enter into the Gödel’s Galaxy in which some regions call galaxies in which we inhabit exist. In those regions information dominates Entropy.

**5D scales of the galaxy: ∆-1: quark families, ∆-cosmic bodies, ∆+1: parts of the galaxy.**

In the 30 years old graph, a mementum of my old self-published books an old gender related duality on the creative processes of galaxies… As usual we remind the ‘scholar’ that this is a seed – what matters are the *principles my task trying to reorder them, for future ‘pros’ to enlarge, refine and develop fully the model of the galatom’s organisms, anti-atom like particles of a larger fractal but not equal hyper-universal variation.*

The most important ages of galaxies are obviously those of life, but because humind physicists come from ballistics and projected its worldly mind into its theoretical models of lineal time and entropy, they are obsessed by the death of each of those scales, E=Mc^{2}, the big-bang of masses, quasar big-bangs and a likely not big bang Universe. So we focus most of the paper on them, as usual from the organic cyclical, Never explained properties, as it would be easy for a ‘pro’ to reduce its equations to those guidance models, with a higher hierarchy/primacy over the detailed equations – a fundamental law of 5D: ‘The larger organic scales and its deep, long time cycles, determine the truth of choice among the smaller detailed analytic mathematical equations’.C

**THE WORLDCYCLE OF GALAXIES. ITS 3 AGES. THE H-R DYAGRAM.**

An H-R graph, shows the wave of existence of a star. It shows therefore its ST- balanced age between the central zero-point of ‘gravity’ and the ST-pressure of radiation in the main sequence.

5D Asymmetry: ∑ œ-1: plasma particles>∏Œ: Stars>∆+1: Galaxy

As in the case of other Œ-species we shall study here its main features, according to the linguistic-isomorphic method starting from the subjective errors of human perception.

As usual humans perceive better the time ages and worldcycle of any species by observing them in space in different states of their time cycle. This is the case of stars and it is called the H-r Diagram, which therefore will be the first symmetry studied here.

The symmetry of its 5D planes is also well known as stars are the factory that reproduces atoms of the intermediate space-time of the galaxy (our ud-matter world) and finally when they die produce both strangelet (pulsar stars) and black holes (huge stars with enough mass to collapse into a reversed particle reaction till creating at op quark star). So the biggest uncertainty of stars happens in the analysis of its central S-nucleus.

Stars can only be observed externally and from the external phenomena (granules, magnetic fields gravitational forces) to deduce some of its internal properties. 5D physics allow us to model further the internal S-center of stars and consider likely the main error of star analysis, the lack of understanding of its internal structure, which as all S elements, should be highly informative, hence cold. Thus the center of the star must be NOT as hot as the membrane but much colder.

This realization we adventured decades ago for planets, and it was latter proved (planets have solid crystal cores). And it should be proved for stars, whose center should be made of super fluid helium and hydrogen, and likely be able to produce cold fusion (as all thermodynamic processes must have an asymmetric duality between cold processes made in slow time, with minimal energy (min. T x Max. S) and hot processes made in fast time with maximal energy (Max. T x min. S), in a clear symmetry with the processes of conception (slow informative birth) and death (fast entropic destruction).

So we shall when completed deal with all those symmetries in the aforementioned order.

*The H-R diagram shows the 3 ages of stars, through its Entropy & information parameters.*

The life, evolution and death of stars are depicted in the H-R Diagram, which classifies stars according to its E & O parameters, as the atomic table does with atoms*:*

*Max. T: Brightness or Magnitude*, which is a spatial parameter that grows with the size of the star*.*

*Max. S: Spectral type, (color or frequency)*, which classifies stars according to its temporal form.

Yet the H-R diagram is only a representation of the 2nd and 3rd ages of stars – since the young age of the star as nebulae of max. Spatial extension and min. formal complexity (as all young ages are) is not represented. So we add on the left side the 1st age of a star as *a nebulae of max.extension*. Then the H-R graph shows the 3 ages of stars and the main isomorphisms of T x S cycles applied to them:

– (∆+1): Most stars are born as spatial nebulae of max. extension.

– Max. T: Then they implode into blue giants of max. Entropy.

– S≈T: They reduce its size and grow in atomic complexity through a mature, yellow age of balance between their T and S parameters. The sun is now in that balanced age…

– Max. S: They collapse in a 3rd age of slow decline as its I X E parameters diminish toward its death, becoming white dwarfs.

∆+1: Or they evolve in a loop of growing I X E force (top right graph), mutating into a Top quark Hole.

From those elements it is easy to enunciate the main events of the time symmetry of stars:

*Recap*. The H-R graph shows also the process of evolution of stars into Top quark Holes, which can be explained both mathematically and organically, based in the self-similarity of all space-time species.

**Star birth**

Stars are born from a nebula (cloud) of gas (hydrogen, helium, and a little bit of everything else) and dust. One such nebula, often studied, is the Orion Nebula. If the nebula is dense enough, it will eventually start collapsing under the influence of its own gravity. As the nebula contracts, it heats up and the rising core temperature and pressure eventually causes hydrogen to fuse. At that point, a star is born. For stars to be able to sustain nuclear fusion, their mass must be at least 0.08 times our Sun’s mass, which is equivalent to about 80 Jupiters.

Stars cannot be more massive than about 150 times our Sun because they simply produce too much energy and become unstable at that point. (Note that several stars more massive than 150 times the Sun have been discovered, but these are extremely rare.) When the gravitational tendency to collapse is balanced by the tendency to expand due to the heat generated by nuclear fusion, the star is said to be in hydrostatic equilibrium. At that point, the star is on the main sequence of the HR diagram. The newborn star will have a luminosity and surface temperature now that will change very little over the course of its lifetime on the main sequence.

Death of low-mass stars

If a white dwarf has a close binary companion, the white dwarf may accrete gas from the companion’s outer atmosphere. The gravitational energy released by the captured gas may be sufficiently great to start a fusion reaction on the surface of the white dwarf. This flare-up is known as a nova. A nova can recur many times, is about 100,000 solar luminosities. fades after a few months (sometimes years). is more common than supernovas (2-3/yr observed, about 200 so far).

Low-mass stars are those that end up as white dwarfs. High-mass stars are those that end their lives in a supernova. Our Sun is an example of a low-mass star; Betelgeuse is an example of a high-mass star. Stars with masses 0.08M < M < 10M (which is the majority of them) live quietly and contently, not changing much, for several billion years on the main sequence.

A star begins to die once it converts all the hydrogen in the core into helium. As hydrogen is used up in the inner and hottest part of the core, the relatively inert helium-rich (hydrogen-depleted) core begins to collapse, and in so doing releases gravitational energy. This energy quickly heats up the outer hydrogen-rich layers and ignites the fusion of hydrogen in a thin shell immediately surrounding the hydrogen-depleted core. As this process continues, the hydrogen-fusing shell migrates outward and heats up the envelope of the star, which then causes the whole star to expand into a Red Giant.

For the lowest-mass stars, core pressure and temperature are not sufficiently high to ignite nuclear fusion of helium. The core then cools while the outer envelope continues to expand. Ultimately, the helium core forms a hot but cooling corpse known as a white dwarf, surrounded by an expanding outer envelope of hydrogen and helium known as the planetary nebula.

The Helix Nebula (also known as NGC 7293) is one of the closest planetary nebulae to Earth (650 light-years away). It is often referred to as the Eye of God on the Internet.

The Helix Nebula is an example of a planetary nebula created at the end of the life of a Sun-like star.

Somewhat higher-mass stars will fuse helium into carbon for a while to produce a denser core composed of carbon “ash” in the center, surrounded by a shell of burning helium, surrounded by a shell of burning hydrogen, which is surrounded by an envelope of inactive (no burning) hydrogen and helium. If the star has even more mass and thus a denser and hotter core, carbon will start to fuse to produce even heavier elements in the center. Another shell of hydrogen burning will form, and beneath it a shell of helium burning.

**Death of high-mass stars**

In graph we consider the 3 sub-species of stars, the ud, light stars, Strange pulsars (neutron stars) and top quark stars (black holes). The natural evolution of a Given Max T x S function define when the collapse of enough matter can create an w2 x r 3 mass system with enough density of mass to accelerate its time clock beyond c-speed in top quark black holes:

High-mass stars have relatively short main-sequence lives: Max. T =Min. S.

High-mass stars have relatively short main-sequence lives: Max. T =Min. S. A 15M star, for example, lives for only about 10 million years before turning into a Red Giant. And in its death, they reverse their function into the maximal informative element of the Universe, the black star. When the star first runs out of hydrogen to fuse in its core it will behave similarly to lower mass red giants. It will first begin fusion of hydrogen in a shell around the core and the core will heat and fuse helium into carbon. There will also be carbon and helium fusion into oxygen. The star’s envelope also bloats out to very large sizes (Supergiants). The supergiant’s core will fuse very heavy elements from carbon and oxygen all the way up to Iron.

Elements heavier than iron cannot be used as a source of energy through fusion. They can, however, be split into lighter elements to release energy, but this process (fission) does not occur in stars. The star takes on an onion-like structure, with shells of different elements fusing into heavier elements, in progressively shorter phases.

For 20-Sun star, hydrogen is exhausted in the core within a few million years and iron develops within about a day (see table below). Ultimately, when the star exhausts its supply of elements in the core lighter than iron, the core collapses in an extremely violent event known as a supernova. The supernova leaves behind either a neutron star or, in the case of the heaviest stars, a black star.

Density/size comparison of white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes

A white dwarf consists essentially of tightly packed atoms which constitute the core of a Sun-like star. The white dwarf of a Sun-like star is about 100 times denser than the Sun. A teaspoon of white dwarf material would weigh about 15 tons. The typical white dwarf is roughly the size of the Earth. A neutron star is essentially the core of a star collapsed into a ball of tightly packed nuclei. A neutron star is over a thousand times denser than a white dwarf. A teaspoon of neutron star material would weigh about 4 billion tons. A typical neutron star is roughly the size of a city.

A black hole is the collapsed core of a star so densely packed that it has virtually no size. The infinitely small volume into which all the matter in a black hole is compressed is called the central singularity. The imaginary sphere that measures how close to the singularity you can safely get is called the event horizon. Once you have passed the event horizon, it becomes impossible to escape: you will be drawn in by the black hole’s gravitational pull and squashed into the singularity. The size of the event horizon (called the Schwarzschild radius) is proportional to the mass of the black star.

Astronomers have found black holes with event horizons ranging from 6 miles to the size of our solar system, although event horizons can, in principle, be bigger or smaller than this. But in principle, black holes can exist with even smaller or larger horizons. Any object compressed sufficiently can be turned into a black star. The Schwarzschild radius for this object is directly related to the mass of the object. For example, the Schwarzschild radius of the Earth is about the size of a marble (if the Earth could somehow be compressed to this size).

** **

**THE ∆º WORLDCYCLE OF MATTER. ITS 5 STATES:**

**TT-PLASMA, TS-GAS, ST-LIQUID, ST-SOLID AND SS-BOSON STATES.**

**∆o: THE 3 AGES OF EXISTENCE OF SPACE-TIME ORGANISMS. ITS 2 WORLDCYCLES AND METRIC EQUATIONS.**

The *Function of Existence* of any space-time organism can be developed as a feedback equation, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages/horizons, between 3 ‘standing points’ (changes of phase): Max. T=motion x Min.S: form =moving youth; Max. SxT(s=t): reproductive maturity and Max. S x Min. T=informative, old age, as the equations of the 3 ages of life, between the seed of pure linguistic form born in the lower plane: S¡-1 and its T¡-1 entropic death, back to ∆¡«∆¡-1:

*∆-1»∆º:* The cycle or organism starts its existence as a seed of pure form (4D) when its space-time field is created.

*sT:* It is the first horizon or ‘energy, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. $t x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t*.* It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

*Max. T x min. S*: 3^{rd} age of the cycle when information has exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

*∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T: * It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∞ sum of space/time fields, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In State Physics they are, $t-gas, the moving state, S=T liquid, the balanced state and §ð-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (*min.$t x max.ð§) *and a form of pure space, the big- bang (*max.$t x min. ð§). In *Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species. In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time). So we find the 3 ages of life *emerging in the 3 ages of cultures and* its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in treccento, Greek kuroi; S=T; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and angst for a no future, which *is the age of war and death of cultures*).

Finally we talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is a highly ordered worldcycle as a placental mother-energy world nurtures a memorial cyclical spacetime that erased errors of previous generations.

– c: The outer 1-∞ world, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

ω: The existential life cycle, though is part of a larger world of hierarchical social scales (§ D¡), where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

. In the graph, Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are two inverse dimotions from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate.

**The 5 Dimotiosn of matter. **

In the graph, the 5 dimotions in thermodynamics are the 3±∆ states of matter: plasma=entropic, ∆-1 scale as ions not yet made into atoms; gas, the locomotion state of maximal movement, liquid, the balanced S=T energy state, crystal-solid, the in-form-ative state, and the 5th ‘state’; the Einstein-Bose condensate of ultra dense matter:

It is a state of transition of top quark stars and strange stars – pulsar, an ∆+1 single ‘atom’ of enormous size.

The fascinating maths of heat, the first to be understood in terms of Analysis (Fourier) which is thermodynamics at ∆+1 scale, and its relationship with the maths of entropy, ∆º, the atomic scale, the *worst understood concept of physics, a cultural hang-up of the germ(anic) cult(ure) to lineal weapons and death, origin of the faulty philosophy of physics (big-bang, death of the Universe, etc.)*

Thus thermodynamics as all other stiences deals with the 5 elements-dimensions of reality:

- S: Space; T: Time; st: spacetime; ∆: scales, º: mind-singularities across scales.

So there are in-roads of thermodynamics in all its parts, of which the key concepts we can extract are:

– **STate physics** deals with the ternary space-time ages/topologies: S-gas<St-liquid>T-solid/crystal, which we shall study in the paper ‘physics and scales’ on the molecular, matter and geological scales (∆-1, ∆º, ∆+1)

**Scale:**The laws of heat and entropy deal with the relationship between the ∆-1:=, statistical mechanics scale and the ∆º, thermodynamic heat scale, which we shall study in this post.- The @-mind level, denied by anthropomorphic human, happens in crystals, which ‘reverse the time entropy of systems’, to build informative images of the word, shrunk in its mirror lattices.

Mathematically this was proved by Mehaute (‘l’espace-temps brisse’), which showed that in chemical systems when cold stops motion, the crystal starts to create fractal order.

Bedouins consider the core of dunes, a crystallized rock they call the ‘rose of the desert’, rightly its soul, which as any other crystal stores its memorial information in the quartz ‘veins’ (informative paths) of its electromagnetic atomic networks. And indeed we can reconstruct the motions of the Dune analyzing those paths.

Such ‘Maxwell’s demons’ embody the concept of order – to be found in crystals, NOT in gaseous disordered states, blown up by ‘entropy-only physicists’ to cosmic proportions.

So the 5 ∆@ST elements of matter systems become the sub-disciplines that study them, resumed in the worldcycle of states of matter, Ts-gas, ST-liquid, St-solid physics, and the scalar analysis of classic thermodynamics. Yet while state physics are essentially correct – you don’t need to be rocket scientist, or rather you just need to be rocket scientist to understand them… classic entropy has enormous conceptual errors accepted due to the fascination its maths provokes in creationist physicists. So we shall briefly analyze its laws.

ST:ATE PHYSICS ∆-1: PLASMA>∆: S-GAS>ST-LIQUID> SS-CRYSTAL SOLID>>∆+1 ‘MASS’ VS. << BIG BANG.

State Physics** **studies the 3±¡ ‘Ages of matter systems’, between its i-1 plasmatic birth and E=Mc^{2}, death vs. its i+1 ‘boson’ resurrection. As all systems of nature DO have a dual path of future; either evolving into a stronger social bondage (bosons in matter) or devolving into its ∆-¡ components (particle and ¥-radiation ‘bang’ in matter).

So the laws of Ts-young, locomotion gas’, ST, balanced, present reproductive liquid, tS, future informative crystal solids and the i-1 plasma age of conception vs. the dual boson/radiation future happening between the quantum i-3 and light ¡+3 planes, conform the ‘worldcycle’ of matter with the same disomorphic laws of any worldcycle.

**Symmetry of scale: ∆º gas ≈ ∆-1 field < ∆º liquid ∆-1 wave > ∆-1 particles≈ ∆º crystals**

The same cycle on the lower ∆-1 quantum scale, in which ‘liquid’ waves, ‘gaseous’ fields and ‘solid particles’ play the same roles on quantum systems.

** **So we can write a *Disomorphic equation of scales between thermodynamic and quantum states:*

Ts (gas-entropy-past state) ≤≥ ST (Liquid-wave present state) ≤≥ SS (Crystal ‘solid’, future, informative state).

As matter states happen in the ‘human scale’, ∆o±1, thermodynamics is the referential stience to understand human energy regardless of ‘quantum hype’. But it must be conceptually corrected, due to the complete misunderstanding of time dimotions in classic physics, to avoid the traps of defining a Universe with only a single dimotion of TT-entropy (Plasma) and Ts-Locomotion (Gas), as if it were merely a ‘gaseous Universe’.

The importance for humanity of thermodynamics is today somewhat dismissed by the hype of the quantum world of electronic machines, as humans and life become expendable to the new chip-mind and its ‘robotic species’.

*We are NOT quantum beings as machines are, neither Gravitational, cosmological beings, as the galaxy is. We are thermodynamic beings, and so state physics is the key energy science for human systems and the planet we live in.*

*Since i*n geological structures the interplay of gas, liquid and solid cycles creates the conditions for Gaia, to become a ∆+1 super organism and its ∆-1 life scale to flourish.

**Sub disciplines of state physics.**

**State Physics can be**** **further subdivided into subdisciplines that according to the pentalogic method study in depth each of those 5 states: -i: Plasma (physics); Ts: Gas; STreproductive, balanced Liquid physics; St-informative Solid, crystallography & +i: Boson Physics, whereas the properties of state physics derive from the general properties of the 3±i dimotional ages of time.

But the most meaningful division is scalar between ∆-1: statistical mechanics and ∆º: Thermodynamics, which consider the perspective of the ∆-1 molecular ‘unobservable’ scale and the human ∆º-scale. It is in this 5D connection between scales, where the classic concepts of entropy (Boltzmann) were developed as a parameter to connect both scales, which is a very specific concept far less comprehensive than 5D TT-entropy for any ∆¡-scale.

We cannot over-extend in any of those stiences which will be analyzed latter in the decade on the papers of physics, so we shall just comment on the Thermodynamic ∆º human scale and revis(it)e its laws that humind’s egocy have hyperbolically expanded to all the places and scales of reality…

**RECAP.** the fundamental generator equation of matter systems:

Ts-Gas (entropic, past state) < Liquid (wave, present ST state) > Crystal (solid, ordered, St state) is

Equivalent to the quantum generator:

Pilot wave (entropic, path, gravitational scale) < wave (present state) > Particle (solid, ordered, SSstate).

In that regard, the proper way to do quantum physics would be NOT to apply its laws to ‘larger scale ensembles’, but to harmonise it and ‘draw conclusions and teachings’ from the much better observed thermodynamic world.

**Classic thermodynamics and its translation…**

Thermodynamics is defined as the science of relationships between heat, work, temperature, and energy. In broad terms, thermodynamics deals with the transfer of energy from one T-place and S-form to another. How this classic definition adapts to our new concepts of ‘ST-energy’, Ts-locomotion and St-information and its ‘limiting’ dimotions of pure TT-entropy and SS-till languages is easy to understand conceptually and mathematically but it requires to ditch out many wrong models of physics in the deepest whys, notably a re-reading of the laws of thermodynamics and its ‘limits’ as they have been expanded absurdly to the cosmological and quantum realm beyond temperature.

**ENERGY PARAMETERS.** Energy is work and work is any OPEN path that changes the time conservation or cyclical patterns of a physical system. So the conservation of Energy means a system is kept in an eternal closed loop of repetitive presents. But by definition *a closed loop is in balance between motion and form*, a Si=Te, hence the function of exist¡ence reaches its Max. e x i level.

Energy is topologically a hyperbolic wave where that balance shows in the ‘equivalence’ between the X and Y coordinates of ‘time’ and ‘space’. In terms of time causality a present form, dominant in space; in form a wave that moves through iteration, in present states entropically feeding in an ∆-1 field. This means in ¬ ælgebra, a mirror image expressed with differentials, which extract ‘finitesimals’ of the ∆-1 scale of space-time to power the larger ST>St, bodyhead, wave-particle organism. So the process of feeding becomes: ∆-1 (∑TT-fields)>∆º>ST-wave

The primary equation that defines most entropic vital processes of physics, including nuclear forces.

**TEMPERATURE** is related to Energy because it is *a vibrational mode of energy, where molecules close its vibration returning to the point or maintaining within a closed environment a fixed space-time volume. As all systems in which we measure temperature, either vibrational solids, or liquids and gases studied in volumes closed by pressure have a fixed S=T form. So temperature plays the role of a ‘cyclic time clock’ in the ∆-human scale and its fundamental equivalence is with ‘frequency’ in the quantum scale, to the point when you red that a system reaches X-billion degrees really they are not measuring ‘heat’ but ‘frequency’, which once the quantum system becomes transformed into a molecular one within the realm of temperature parameters becomes ‘temperature’.*

**WORK*** is then a measure of a change in the energy- time state of a system, as it does not exist if there is not an open expansive displacement, or lineal motion. So work acts as a bridge between energy and entropy parameters.*

The key concept is that heat is a form of energy corresponding to a definite amount of mechanical work. And we distinguish two types of ST-energy: St-potential energy based in the form of the being and Ts-kinetic energy:

*ST-Energy: K.E.: ∫ (Max. e) x i ∂s ∂t* + *Information Energy (potential): ∫ (Max. i) x e ∂t ∂s*

Where entropy understood as motion is dominant but there is form, hence there is in-form-ation in the motion. So its equations can be resumed in terms of lineal, expansive motions with a minimal form.

**ENTROPY PARAMETERS. **So finally we arrive to HEAT, which is the ‘REAL entropic concept’, as heat EXPANDS. It is indeed an entropic scattering expansion of energy as it disorders: ST (ENERGY) <<TT (HEAT).

So the trinity fractal Generator of thermodynamics is: ST (Temperature:Energy) < Ts Work < TT(Entropic Heat)

**THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS REVIS(IT)ED.**

With those simple straight-forward definitions we can then tacked and revise the laws of Classic thermodynamics where entropy has been blown up into a philosophy of science considers only a single plane of space-time and reduces the 3±¡ dimotions of time to 1 bringing up the absurd idea that ‘the Universe is dying’ (Helmoth).

Since in a Universe of multiple planes (graph) a trinity of effects allows order to be restored:

- The energy and information entropy ‘kills’ resurrects, as an ∆-1 seeds in-forms the motion released by ‘entropy’. • In a given scale its thermodynamic equilibrium is reversed by the order of SS<St systems, Maxwell Demons =Minds, which act creating organic order.
- The inverse asymmetric dimotions of the 5th dimension limit energy losses, when we try through entropy to ‘move’ the energy of an ∆-1 scale into an ∆º-scale, preserving the form of its parts.
- Finally entropy in ∆-1 is compensated by the perfect synchronicity without loss of energy that we acts inversely from a whole into its smaller part:

In the graph, thermodynamics changes n its interpretation when we consider multiple scales of time, as the loss of ST-Energy from ∆-1 to ∆ is upset by the inverse growth of in/form/ation from ∆ to ∆-1 since those motions do not have entropy (synchronicity of motion).

The most important laws of thermodynamics are thus transformed TO EXPAND its meaning to 5 matter Dimotions. Accordingly we can use the pentalogic method to put them in relationship with the main Dimotions and ∆¬@st elements of reality:

*-0:SS: Homeostasis law: The zeroth** law of thermodynamics.* When two systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third system, the first two systems are in thermal equilibrium with each other. This property means thermometers as a “3^{rd} system” can define a temperature scale. But it does NOT mean the system is dead because it has thermal equilibrium. It is subtler: A system in thermal equilibrium has a higher degree of social order; *as particles are alike.* It becomes therefore able to organise itself better with information, as in life systems which requires homeostasis. The zeroth law relates to the ‘SS<St’ dimotions and mental elements of a physical system, as organisms and mind-mappings require a balanced temperature to work properly *with only subtle changes in the structure of its in-form-ation, form in action. As a high temperature or one that varies too much, implies disordered movements that break those subtle motions. *

So we shall instead generalise it to all systems with a different name (the willy-nilly game of ‘numbers’, for the awe-inspiring-digital groupie do not apply to 5D, *as other scales of reality do have different languages and we are unifying them*) – The Law of homeostasis – and state that:

“A system of fractal points joined by a present ∆-wave of ‘energy≈heat’ tends to distribute ‘democratically’ the energy and form of the wave to all its components, to ensure the internal balance of them’. And put as customary in the Homologic Method of 5D, a minimum of 3 examples from physical, biological and social sciences:

In other terms, systems tend to establish a just, distributive balance between the points of the network, which will receive a minimal amount of energy, call it a blood networks, 2.7k homeostatic temperature of the galaxy, or the freezing equal temperature in which a metal-mind chip works.

*-1 ^{st} Law: ST: C*

*onservation of energy. 0-sum, closed cycles.*‘Energy never dies, it constantly transforms back and forth into information, through the repetition of body-wave across ∆±1 planes of existence: Ts < ExI> SS.

The *law defines the cyclical 0-sum worldcycles of matter, as systems that return to its initial state and allow all the cycles of matter of planet Earth. It *means energy is conserved, as there is no work or energy expenditure in closed time-cycles.* Time does NOT work, meaning time cycles are closed cycles which do NOT spend work-energy; and this amazingly important fact, hardly understood philosophically by the wannabe gurus of the absolute means ultimately that time is eternal, and so it is the Universe, which has no manifest destiny, no lineal goal. Lineal time indeed would exhaust itself as it would spend the energy of the Universe.*

Thus we expand this law to include information and at the same time, diminish its range by applying it only to exchanges within a single plane of existence, which not being the general rule as always there are leaks of energy and information up and down those scales, restrict the accuracy of our measures.

It is worth to notice that the graph has an asymmetric dimotion of order, because *while Plasma and gas are reversible: ∆-1 Plasma **ó** ∆o: Ts-Gas; we cannot jump from plasma to solid, ∆-1>>∆+1, whereas a solid crystal can be considered as the emergence of a new single ‘unit’ of a higher plane of existence but we can convert a solid into plasma in Death actions, E=MC ^{2, }which take only a quanta of time to happen. *

*This is a Universal law that establish a slow sequence of long time, from ∆-1 to ∆+1 through 3 ages and a fast track that ‘jumps’ the ‘present-liquid, ST-ate’ from Solid to plasma in death which therefore has NO PRESENT: ∆+1«∆-1.*

__The 3±i time states: __

*In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same as it opens and closes the cycle (since the boson and radiation states are very rare in a ‘temperature’ ambience.*

Thus, the Ts gas, ST liquid and St solid ages of matter and its dynamic worldcycles adding the final ∆±¡ death/ evolutionary states form dual binary and trinity ‘cyclical’ reversible system:

* +I Boson Condensate <=> Solid <=> Liquid <=>Gas <=>-i Plasma*

It shows all possible transformations between STages of matter from the Ts-gaselous state happening in systems of minimal network organisation, to the solid state that anchors a system into an orderly steady state. Matter allows *all possible changes between ages with preference for the natural flow of time worldcycles towards ‘cooling information’: gas>liquid>Solid. *

*And this preference is observed in the ‘minimal energy’ law spent in all transformations of st-ate.*

*In the graph we see the ‘1 ^{st} law’ in the cyclical patterns of the solid-gas-liquid.*

*Because motion is the ultimate substance of Nature, time-motion is eternal and this justifies the 1 ^{st} law, which implies ultimately every ‘open system’ is part of a larger closed system that preserves the 1^{st} law. *

Another expression of the law tells us that ‘change in a system’s internal energy is equal to the difference between heat added to the system from its surroundings and work done by the system on its surroundings’. So we can write a fractal generator in which *heat and work converge into the central zero sum state of energy:*

*TT-Heat> ST-energy <Ts-Work*

** ****-2 ^{nd} Ts<TT law**

**; or ‘ fractal generator’ of thermodynamics: Open, lineal cycles**.

**A pentalogic view.**

Let us try a more complex multilogic analysis of the 2^{nd} law.

**∆±¡** Scalar view: In the graph, the essence of the 2^{nd} law is scalar. While we can convert mechanical work from ∆º into heat, energy in ∆-1; *we cannot transfer all energy of ∆-1, the parts, to the whole ∆º, which is obvious, as ∆º is just* an ‘emergent’ new plane of existence parasit of ∆-1, which needs to keep part of its ‘motion’ to function in ∆º. This said the intelligent Universe constructs ‘physiological networks’ to maximize the in-taking of energy from the parts to the whole.

Temporal view:* The justification of the law derivers from the previous equations from past to future, (plasma to solid) which always crosses through a present balanced ST-ate, unlike Future to past motions (deaths) that do not cross usually the present: TT-Past>Ts<ST>Ts Present> SS-Future v. SS-Future«TT-Past. *

Spatial view: This means when we go upwards from ∆-1 past ‘heat’ into ‘Future’ ordered motions in an ∆+1 mechanical solid system, *part of the heat is wasted in the present-energy intermediate state; while going down from the ∆+1 scale to the ∆-1 scale as we don’t move through the present ST-balanced STage, we can convert ALL the work of the ∆+1 macrosystem into molecular ∆-1 system.*

Entropic view: in other words death is fast and extremely efficient, reason why it is mathematically expressed by the fastest growing e^{-x }exponential equation.

Mental view: And so ultimately entropy-motion defeats SS-minds which CANNOT stop the entire Universe.

The metaphysical question is: if *the 2 ^{nd} law limits the number of potential scales that can be constructed, and how much energy can be transferred orderly upwards. The commonest answer is ’50-50’, which maintains a balance of ‘existential momentum’ in the trophic pyramids of parts and wholes. Yet as supœrganisms co-exist meaningfully in 3 scales we must also investigate the relationships between 2 given ‘scales’, or dual quantum jumps.*

In a trilogic scalar analysis we observe that the law of inversion between scales: ∑∑|-1>∑O¡=|+1 applies when the observer enlarges and slows down its view. Since from our perspective in the quantum scale the action is measured in terms of angular momentum (h); in the thermodynamic scale in terms of entropy (k) in the mechanical gravitational scale in terms of ‘lineal speed’. So clearly systems as the growth in scale become simpler. But in Non-E Geometry (see paper 5D geometry), we know the ‘perception of curvature’ is relative to the size of the observer (Lobachevski’s factor), reason why we see a flat Earth from our small perspective but a cyclical one from the larger moon angle. So the lineal C-speed motions of light in the galaxy from the small perspective appear as a curved spiraling St motion of stars and light around the central black hole. And the slow time paths of the galaxy accelerate for the slow giant that could see it with a megaparsecs’ eye. Absolute relativity then leaves the conundrum of the number of scales unresolved. It is though clear that if scales are infinite space must also be infinite, but again as we perceive a limited horizon, which is always local as light dies approximately in the 11^{10-11 }scale we can neither resolve that question. It is absurd to think a mush on a lost rock of the Universe understands & perceives the whole.

Back to our scale what we also observe is a ¿ dual motion; as ‘∆+1 work’ becomes ∆-1 ‘heat’ increasing the disorder of the ∆-1 scale but then the disorder disappear**s as heat is cooling down as ‘**Heat flows then spontaneously from a hotter region to a colder region, balancing the system into homeostasis. This is misinterpreted as death because balance thermodynamical equilibrium and mental stillness are not understood. From waves that basically dissipate energy to reestablish the balance of a network to entropy the phenomena responds to the supremacy of still, mental information over entropy from the point of view of the organism.

In fact in a given scale entropy is not relevant: there are phenomena of superfluidity in the quantum scale; and mechanical systems can move without apparent internal friction according to the principle of lineal inertia for eternal motion; so entropy is a limitation between scales to allow the co-existence in balance of all of them.

It is part of the limits for a perfect fluid motion between scales that make any species a local event and explain why it is ultimately so difficult to explore the fifth dimension of which humans amazingly enough know nothing.

**The 2 ^{nd} law in terms of the fractal generator.**

A common formulation of the 2^{nd} law is: heat at a given temperature cannot be converted entirely into work.

So the law reorders the 3 parameters of ST-energy, Ts-work and TT-entropy in the Thermodynamic Generator:

ST (Temperature:Energy)< Ts-Work < TT(Entropic Heat)

Observe the difference of ‘Dimotional dimotions’ with the 1^{st} law. < is the only dimotion that expands the system. So in this ‘allowed’ configuration, the system indeed increases constantly its Entropy. But we must balance this dimotion with the 0 and 3^{rd} law of crystal, in-form-ative, homeostatic grow of information to restore the balance.

Yet while this is truth it only applies to the transmission of energy from lower, ∆-1 ensembles into an ∆-whole, not viceversa: ∆-wholes synchronise the simultaneous motions of all its ∆-1 parts, achieving with it ‘lesser information’ and ‘simpler, larger motions’ a loss of zero entropy when they move all its parts, according to the direction of future set up by the whole.

As usual the error of physicists is to generalise a local phenomena on the ∆±1 matter scale, forgetting the balances obtained from non-entropic motions handled by the whole≈physical minds, which restore the balance of the system in the opposite ‘3^{rd} law’ of crystal order, 0’-temperatures and gravitational non-thermal forces.

*By ignoring the ∆@ elements of reality thermodynamics looses any value as a philosophy of general global laws.*

Such laws apply only to the entropy of a closed single ∆-scale system, which tends toward an equilibrium state in which entropy – the scattering and equality of heat among all its ∆-1 elements, is at a maximum and no energy is available to do useful work at the ∆-level.

This asymmetry between forward and backward processes gives rise to what is known as the “dimotion of time” in classic thermodynamics, which as we said is a simplification of the 3 dimotions of time, due to the error of a single space-time continuum, converted into a huge global error by extending it to every system.

Indeed, ‘a single entropic dimotion of time’ for all phenomena deduced of the study of expansive heat=entropy in steam machines, is a local reductionist simplex analysis of time dimotions. And to expand it to include all the planes of the Universe, all the beings, by reducing the 5 dimotions of reality to ‘heat, entropic motions’ is plainly bogus. The law merely becomes a single dimotion of dying entropic time, when we eliminate all other scales and st, T, elements of the system. And we will return to that.

When considering the 5D dimotion between atoms and heat, a measure of the human scale, *its comprehension is blurred by the language – as entropy doesn’t measure motions backwards and forwards in 4D time but motion backwards in the 5th dimension of social scalar evolution, as a dimension of dissolution of wholes and its order. *

*Such as when we want to use and exhaust the motion of ∆-1 systems, which are NOT organised by complex networks but just merely as humans do, with ‘heating machines’, entropic ‘fire’, and some other brutish systems, obviously *the molecules and atoms of the lower scale have the same interest to order perfectly and give up its motion to that brutish wholes a mass of humans have to be herded by a military thug.

Entropy appears in minimal processes of organization such as heat is to extract motion of individual ∆-1 elements.

However when a system is fully organised, according to 5D organic laws entropy greatly diminishes, as in Crystals, which have basically zero entropy, or organisms, which increase the order of beings and diminish its entropy.

*Egocy physicists just deny the existence of fractal points that gauge information and gravitational forces that balance expansive, electromagnetic entropy order the Universe, to make man the only ‘mind’ of reality.*

So the law should be rephrased regarding the conservation of motion and information:

‘In the whole Universe entropy does not exist. As the Universe is made of motion and curvature, which balance each other through all its ∆-scales. So when a system becomes disordered and expands its entropy in an ∆-1 scale; the order is restored by the simultaneous, informative order of larger ∆+1 wholes which contract and synchronise the ∆-systems.

So ∆-¡ quantum scales of physical, electromagnetic entropy are balanced by the ∆+n scales of gravitational, only-attractive information. And we have to assess the total order of a system, studying at least ∆±n scales together.

*-The 3 ^{rd} St law*

*of thermodynamics.*The entropy of a perfect crystal in its most stable form tends to zero as the temperature approaches absolute zero. This allows an absolute scale for entropy to be established that, from a statistical point of view, determines the degree of randomness or disorder in a system.

So the third law establishes that near absolute zero, entropic disorder by heat, no longer apply.

*It is the inverse fractal generator that balances the 2 ^{nd} law: *TT(Entropic Heat)> ST (ÑTemperature)< SS-crystal

The dimotion of information however is subtle and ‘intelligent’, in its ‘efficient’ approach to the use of energy. In that regard we can compare a crystal ‘network’ with a biological network that manages to ‘transfer’ with maximal efficiency through branching energy from the ∆+1 lung system into the minimal cells.

In that regard, the absurd universal view of the 2^{nd} law happened before the understanding that growing order and perfect motion with no entropy happens in the cold regimes. Since in ‘organic physical matter’ the most important effects of order creation happen when thermodynamic entropy is minimal – phenomena such as superconductivity, superfluidity, bosons, etc. We talk also of a finitesimal zeroth as the relative ‘temperature’ of a mind, which creates a still map of reality it then projects on the larger reality diminishing its ∆+1 worlds’ entropy. In other words: *‘The Universe is filled with Maxwell’s demons’*

Zero crystal entropy tells us also several things: a crystal, or perceptive physical, SS mind that maps out an ‘intelligent’ mirror image of the Universe inside its mind is cold, tends to total order, and minimal motion. So it is the *3 ^{rd} Law of cold physical matter. But both a mind and a crystal move the Universe, as they become focus of smaller ∆-2 pixels of information that map out and slightly change ‘bit by bit’ the view of the world. *

*So even in the near stillness of 0K, motion never stops. Temperature then must be considered not only a measure of motion but also of ‘disorder’ and ‘linear’, expansive Ts-motion; since a superfluid rotates very fast and a black hole rotates at c-speed but in orderly fashion at minimal temperature, as they are St-inward motions that hardly ‘spill’ out its energy (to be measured as temperature). *

If we include other ∆-scales beyond matter, they modify those laws creating order. I.e. gravitation is a force of order as it only attracts and ‘contracts’, in-form-ing a system; so it balances the tendency to entropy of ¥-rays.

So the ∆±¡ quantum and gravitational Universe that sandwiches us, rescues the world from entropic death through its orderly actions – *reason why the parameters of ACTION=DIMOTION are only measured in terms of entropy in the Thermodynamic scale (TT-Boltzmann constant) but not in the ∆-gravitational scale (Ts-C-speed) and quantum (St-H-angular momentum)*

Because thermodynamics developed during the XIX C. in response to the need to optimize the performance of steam engines, it is wrong to expand by dogma to the whole universe those laws of thermodynamics, as they apply only to physical, molecular matter, the ∆±1 scales and biological systems, without understanding how order is restored in biological systems by its minds, in ∆±1 by crystals and future dimotions of social evolution. *As a system either has motion or form, it switches between both states; a fact only recognised by the pioneers of **fractal chemistry such as Mr. Mehaute, who proved (L’espace-temps brisse) that when a thermodynamic system stops moving externally, it subtly starts to create further internal order with ‘crackles’=networks of form.*

**Correspondence between the laws of thermodynamics and the laws of Existential algebra.**

The study of the laws of thermodynamics in 5D is Disomorphic to the study of the main variations of the fractal generator of ¬Æxistential algebra (see paper, ‘The stientific method’) and its properties. And the 2^{nd} law is just one of those ‘variations’, as the sum of them all is ultimately a zero-worldcycle

We redefine those laws in terms of ∆@st, as *they are the ∆ dual dimotions of order of the previous pyramid and the ‘Maxwell demon @minds’ that tell the system where to be and go.*

**Correspondence with the states of matter.**

We can tackle in reverse order the 3 laws of thermodynamics as expressions of the 3 single plane states of matter:

* SS: Solid crystals. 0’ finitesimal entropy, Still mind-information: *

*The third law of thermodynamics* states that the entropy of a perfect crystal close to 0 Kelvin is zero. This means that in a perfect crystal, at 0 Kelvin, nearly all molecular motion should cease in order to achieve ΔS=0. A perfect crystal is one in which the internal lattice structure is the same at all times; in other words, it is fixed and non-moving, and does not have rotational or vibrational energy. This means that there is only one way in which this order can be attained: when every particle of the structure is in its proper place.

The mind is indeed a o-mapping of all reality where motion is ‘expelled’ for the form to be absolute and reflect by the ‘determined’ actions of the being, which sees its mind as the deterministic still universe – what it is.

*ST: Energy: The first law states that present energy is conserved.*

*TT: the Second Law of Thermodynamics corresponds to the ‘entropy-disorder’ state, hence it is tautological:*

**The total entropy of a thermodynamic system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value.**

**Pentalogic on entropy from the point of view of space, time, scale, mind-languages and double TT-entropy.**

**A complex pentalogic analysis of entropy in terms of ¬∆@st, time, scale and space interprets ***that:*

*that:*

*– As time passes, the branching of future paths into St, Ts, ST ternary states increases. *

*– As time passes, the branching of future paths into St, Ts, ST ternary states increases.*

*So in space the information of the system becomes less deterministic.*

*So in space the information of the system becomes less deterministic.*

*– @mind. But internally the membrane and mind- singularity (or membrain)*

*Entropy in space-time thus relates to the fascinating concept of ‘all the possibilities’ of evolution of a system into the future, which basically are 3±0, moving along the 3 dimotions of s, st, t of a single plane, and/or the ∆±1 dimotions of emergence and dissolution out of a given ∆º plane.*

We are now ready to provide a definition of entropy in classic physics and properly interpret it. The entropy S – a MACROSTATE, ∆º parameter – is defined in terms of the micro-state parameters, as: **S=k ln Ω**

where k is Boltzmann’s constant (never mind it was found by my admired colossus Mr. Planck) and Ω the number of microstates consistent with the given macrostate.

So in 5D terms *we either:*

*∆-1>∆: reduce the possible paths of future, of an ensemble of ∆-1 micro states to its smaller future whole information. As the set of sets is larger than the whole set (Cantor paradox homology).*

*So, a social group of ‘numbers=events’ (Ω), which represent the paths of future of a series of ‘space-time quanta≈actions (k) that have more spatial population=informative-time events in the ∆-1 scale than the whole; can be reduced to its ∆º states, by means of a slow growing logarithmic curve (ln), inverse to its ‘exponential function of growth’, which will be the opposite perspective from ∆ to ∆º:*

- ∆<∆-1 decay from wholeness into its parts, is thus the inverse famous decay exponential equation, showing in this manner an essential symmetry between ∆-1 and ∆ parts and wholes, in terms of its ‘quantity of possible future formal paths and degrees of freedom’.

*–** In scale is where entropy has its more clear meaning as the ∆-1 scale of parts does NOT give all its energy to ∆º.*

The increase of entropy with time for isolated, LOCAL, THERMAL systems plays a fundamental role in determining the direction of its ∆º<∆+1 scalar “dimotion of time.”

For example, everyday life presents no difficulty in distinguishing the forward flow of time from its reverse. For example, if a film showed a glass of warm water spontaneously changing into hot water with ice floating on top, it would immediately be apparent that the film was running backward because the process of heat flowing from warm water to hot water would violate the second law of thermodynamics. However, this obvious asymmetry between the forward and reverse directions for the flow of time does not persist at the level of fundamental interactions because individual collisions are unchanged by reversing the direction of time. An observer watching a film showing two water molecules colliding would not be able to tell whether the film was running forward or backward. Since entropy and the second law are 5^{th} dimensional motions *that concern the relationships of order between parts and wholes. In a thermal force whose ‘constant of space-time K is measured with values of entropy’ hence an entropic force by nature, (unlike the ∆-3 scale of light whose constant of space-time, h, has values of St-angular momentum or the gravitational world of mass constants with SS-accelerated space-time value) the ∆-1<<∆+1 time flow grows in disorder as we increase the ‘size’ of the whole. *

Heat at the molecular level is the random kinetic energy of motion of molecules, and collisions between molecules provide the microscopic mechanism for transporting heat energy from one place to another., heat can flow just as well in one direction as the other. Thus, from the point of view of fundamental interactions, there is nothing to prevent a chance event in which a number of slow-moving (cold) molecules happen to collect together in one place and form ice, while the surrounding water becomes hotter. Such chance events could be expected to occur from time to time in a vessel containing only a few water molecules. However, the same chance events are never observed in a full glass of water, not because they are impossible but because they are exceedingly improbable. This is because even a small glass of water contains an enormous number of interacting molecules (about 10^{24}), making it highly unlikely that, in the course of their random thermal motion, a significant fraction of cold molecules will collect together in one place. Although such a spontaneous violation of the second law of thermodynamics is not impossible, an extremely patient physicist would have to wait many times the age of the universe to see it happen.

The foregoing demonstrates an important point: the second law of thermodynamics is statistical in nature. It has no meaning at the level of individual molecules, whereas the law becomes essentially exact for the description of large numbers of interacting molecules. In contrast, the first law of thermodynamics, which expresses conservation of energy, remains exactly true even at the molecular level.

Again *we see that the 2 ^{nd} law is local in space, time and scale unlike the 1^{st} law, which is universal to all ∆ST.*

*– ¬*** Entropy is also related also to lineal expansive motion=disorder,**** **which is the wider definition of** 5D (**taken from the wider vague concept of philosophical entropy of physicists and its dimotion of time).

*But even in such case Entropy is relative, a local phenomena with limits in space, time, scale and mind.*

The example of ice melting in a glass of hot water demonstrates the other sense of the term entropy, as an increase in randomness and a parallel loss of information. Initially, the total thermal energy is partitioned in such a way that all of the slow-moving (cold) molecules are located in the ice and all of the fast-moving (hot) molecules are located in the water (or water vapour). After the ice melted and the system comes to thermal equilibrium, the thermal energy is uniformly distributed throughout the system. The statistical approach provides a great deal of valuable insight into the microscopic ∆-1 structure of matter. The great beauty and strength of classical thermodynamics are that its predictions are completely independent of the microscopic structure of matter.

**∆º>∆+1 scalar interactions.**

A chief point of confusion is the fact that humans observe the Second Law externally.* So huminds only measure the outer fields preyed on through in its interaction with the system*; in which *the central mind-singularity of order and/or enclosing membrane constrains, orders the vital space the system** – a topologic open ball body-wave which is NON-perceivable externally neither ‘reckoned’ in Euclidean geometries of points without parts as it is precisely the inside parts of the system or the ∆-1 scale.. Order thus increases internally while externally entropy increases but both balance if huminds would accept non-Euclidean points, scalar internal ∆-1 orderly states, etc.*

Most real thermodynamic systems are open systems that exchange heat and work with their environment, rather than closed=LOCAL systems ruled by the 2^{nd} law. For example, living systems clearly achieve a local reduction in their entropy as they grow and develop; they create structures of greater internal energy (i.e., they lower entropy) out of the nutrients they absorb. This does not violate the 2^{nd} law of thermodynamics, because a living organism does not constitute a closed=LOCAL system.

For example, Earth constantly receives entropic energy in the form of sunlight but internally increases order converting the cycles of heat and cold weather into ‘triggers’ of the ST>St fundamental ‘rhythm of life ‘reproductive radiations’ and evolutionary glaciation states that structure life evolution (see paper ‘Biology and entropy’). And further on internally it grows order for different NON-THERMAL magnetic forces – which protect the membrain from external ¥-rays disorder and likely from a memorial ‘Galactic program’ of evolution of planets through 3 ages, as the continental processes of reunion and split of continents shaped evolution and draw the map of history and further on today receives order from all the humind-points aka life-beings and AI and digital networks on the surface. But physical instruments do NOT measure and input those forms of orders.

What physicists should talk about is* order vs. disorder; as a 5D stientist would say ‘A system first ∆ its disorder in radiation wave-entropy, ST<TT events, as a pre-condition for its supœrganisms’ networks to ‘order’ TT-motions into form and ’emerge’ into the ∆+1 whole, SS singularity-minds’ upper, ∆º+1 scale. *

**Reversible vs. irreversible processes: how to turn back the dimotion of entropy into an orderly form.**

The second law is not universal, and this was somehow recognised when the third law: zero entropy for a crystal mind, was accepted). Further on reversibility is canonical in quantum physics (particles) as we cannot distinguish any direction of a motion.

In mechanics we can also talk on terms of Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, to understand *reversible processes, akin to those concepts in thermodynamics.*

*Even if mechanics, an ∆+1 scale has a different view from the human ∆º of the three scales, given the asymmetry of 5D parts and wholes, balanced in the ST level: ¡+1 is a view of lesser information than the massive amount of information coming from the faster more abundant fractal scales of the parts, in quantum physics.*

In that sense the key concept of 5D behind a reversible process *in the ternary ∆ST symmetries is information*:

“For a reversible process in time space or scale to happen, the level of control of time events, spatial directions or scalar populations must be at ∆-1, infinitesimal parts and minimal frequencies micro-management’.

*Reversibility in space is so overwhelming because we have enough information from the perspective of left or right. When information about the upper or lower scale, the future or the past, the forward or backward view in space is lacking, reversibility flounders. *

*Consider the simplest case of lack of information. If you move backwards reversing your forwards movement it is obvious that sooner or latter you will fail to reverse your path because you don’t see it, and so you will stumble. In scales and time the same concept applies. In scale the failure for micro-particles to control the upper scale, which **emerges as the relative future (since parts must come first to build emergent wholes) has the same reason. And ultimately is due to the different non-Euclidean geometry, outlined in the graph: *

*The view of the whole for the parts is limited, as the networks of information that control them are invisible (information is smaller and faster, by virtue of 5D metrics, $ x ð =C.*

*On the other hand the whole can encircle and manage wholesale the parts by changing its general parameters of energy and information, as the Earth does with its glaciation cycles with its micro-life species, or humans do with machines to extract energy from thermal sources. But this management is NOT thorough. So it normally does NOT affect the ‘heat capacity’ (the true parameter that should be argued instead of the philosophical, creationist, mathematical concept of ‘probability and entropy’, just one more of the many errors of the creationist, German Idealist school of science of the turn of the century (including the Copenhagen interpretation, fascism and communism, which are fed-forced on reality with its obvious consequences). Heat capacity allow efficient micro-systems to absorb existential ST-energy and keep it not giving it away as ‘heat’, which Ts-moves and dilates a thermometer to measure TT-emperature (an entropic parameter).*

*But this is good as it keeps both, the ∆-1 and ∆º scales in balance.*

*As a corollary all this implies that the macro-being, the elephant in the room, shall not control but merely dissuade the micro-parts to take their decisions, since infinite micro-populations can only be managed efficiently if internally they ‘agree’ to give away its existential energy.*

*This is indeed the key way in which in History a capitalist democracy controls its people to tax-farm them, make them obey the law , etc.: they are dissuaded it is the best of all systems, they naively think presidents are elected not ‘$elected’; and they know little of the workings of the flows of money that control society and the ‘black hole of power’ – those who issue money, bankers that control with corruption the law and own everything as they print money at null cost for free. It is the same in all working organisms. The brain is invisible to the cells it manages; the black hole is invisible to the stars it positions with invisible gravitational waves in the galactic superorganism. Above the graph we see this Mind-informative system in control of the whole. *

*It is for that reason the parts don’t perceive the whole, but if the whole tries ‘brutally’ to control the parts obviously entropy happens, the ∆-1 herd does not obey easily. So when as in physics the complexity of the informative micro-management is ignored and there is an entropic obsession to reduce it all to simplicity, with such poor tools as Euclidean Geometry, single entropy arrows of time, etc. the outcome is a bizarre worldview.*

*In praxis the system needs a SS internal knot of order, or mind invaginated by nervous /informative fractal networks that touch all cells to create simultaneous behaviour which only happens in crystal solids, through van der waals and magnetic field control or in biologic systems with nervous control of simultaneous cell motions – and we imagine in the less observed invisible world of galaxies by gravitational ‘DNA-like informative black holes’ micro-managing the evolution, and feeding of its dark matter cells, on the star mitochondria. *

And this is expressed in mechanics by the Lagrangian function whose minimalist derivatives on time tend to zero (least time actions), and hence in the whole conservative energy world cycle integral of the being, the Hamiltonian becomes also a conserved zero-sum.

In thermodynamics, the same concept means a reversible process is a process whose direction can be “reversed” by inducing infinitesimal changes to some property of the system via its surroundings, while not increasing entropy.

Throughout the entire reversible process, the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings. Since it would take an infinite amount of time for the reversible process to finish, perfectly reversible processes are impossible. However, if the system undergoing the changes responds much faster than the applied change, the deviation from reversibility may be negligible. In a reversible cycle, a reversible process, which is cyclic, the system and its surroundings will be returned to their original states if the forward cycle is followed by the reverse cycle.

So it is understood why *humans cannot as elephants on a very subtle scalar Universe make most process reversible just with their huge, dull methods of control. Simply speaking the ‘will of individual atoms’ refuses to yield to the bullies and so heat and entropy ensues; as it does in brutish social dictatorships as opposed to subtle placebo democracies where the capitalist masters of the Financial-media system merely ‘suggest’ the mass from its advantageous point of view, what to do, and the **citizen, ‘believer’ will therefore create order without understanding the networks of money and mass-media have suggested him what to do. *

So the Universe reaches order and reversibility only when it is build a system with efficient, superorganic structures. All other systems will have entropy as synchronicity is lacking.

In that regard the entire concept of an irreversible entropy dimotion for the whole universe, does not even work on matter systems, as it is merely yet another ego-trip of the homunculus on the loose, thinking that if he cannot ‘get it’ by himself, the universe is guilty and wrong- those damn atoms that misbehave (:

So, the ‘particular’ laws of thermodynamics give a complete description of all changes in the energy state of any system and its ability to perform useful work on its surroundings, but only when we make a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of that plane and its internal phenomena, discharging the interchanges of energy and information with the ∆±1 scales.

In that sense thermodynamics also has a scalar structure, and so epistemologically we talk of 2 branches:

∆o: Classical thermodynamics, which does not involve the consideration of individual atoms or molecules.

∆-1>∆: Such concerns are the focus of the branch of thermodynamics known as statistical thermodynamics, or statistical mechanics, which expresses macroscopic thermodynamic properties in terms of the behaviour of individual particles and their interactions.

It has its roots in the latter part of the 19th century, when atomic and molecular theories of matter began to be generally accepted. And so a clear form to study the ‘errors’ of a single space-time analysis of entropy and one which includes at least a couple of ∆-scales is to see the differences between both scalar approaches. Since the key to understand properly thermodynamics is to analyse how disorder in one scale ∆-heat in fact merely means that the ∆-1 scales *wishes to create its proper order and motions.*

So we need to include *besides the study of open and closed states of a thermodynamic system in a single ∆-scale, the ‘whole picture’ by adding the study of ‘closed and opened’ systems in 3 ∆±1 scales, asking questions such as:*

‘This event study transfers energy or information to the ∆±1 scales of the system and if so, which dimotion is dominant, ∆+1>∆ order or ∆-1<∆ entropy?

For example in beta decay equations of entropic disorder of a particle, spin (cyclical order) is missed. So the order was restored by including the ∆-1, neutrino quanta which the process of death and devolution of the nucleon transfers as all entropic phenomena do, to its lower ∆-1 faster/larger scale.

*It is this type of actions of balancing the ‘books’ which physicists stubbornly do not do for entropic heat, adding to the mix gravitational in-form-ative forces and ‘@minds’, Maxwell demons, what explains the errors of a dying universe of its science philosophies.*

**The Universe as a whole has zero entropy=disorder.**

In classic physics entropy is ultimately a scalar property that relates the number of micro-states of a system to its larger SINGLE perceived macrostate. In physics entropy was measured first in gases which are by definition the most disordered state of matter. So obviously entropy was ginormous, proportional to the number of molecules, from *the point of view* of the *humind’s reduced view of the system in the macrostate*, which only perceived macro-properties of measure, Pressure, volume, Energy and temperature (PV=nkT=E).

Moroever this concept of entropy leads to Laplace argument on a deterministic Universe. If we knew all the data of the initial state of particles even in a gaseous state, all their paths will be deterministic and only one landscape arises. And if we were small enough to inquire each atom, he will tell you he ‘knows where he is going’, even if he is moving from one side to another rather subconsciously. I.e. if we look at a mass of humans in a demonstration from above, like the 3^{rd} man looks at the points below in the Austrian Park, they seem indistinguishable and any configuration of the demonstration will be possible for the view of the capitalist in his ivory tower – a bunch of lefties protesting. The only information we get then is the reason of its protest (the substance of the gas), and the approximate number of ‘human molecules’ and perhaps the ‘heat temperature’ – the degree of anger and motion of the demonstration. *Entropy then is on the eye of the macro-beholder. *

The absurd expansion of Entropy and thermodynamic laws to all scales, forces and phenomena, for the wanting of physicists to become philosophers of science is just an egocy (Ego=idiocy) trait as temperature is a local, molecular property and gas, one of the 5 Dimotions of matter. Consider the other extreme form, solid, transparent crystals, which have a macrostate recognizable in an image formed within the crystal. *This image corresponds to a single micro-state *for each pixel of the image. Thus the configuration of the microstate is only one and entropy is zero. This can be expanded to any linguistic mind system, regardless of how much humans do know of the microstate. An image in a TV requires each specific electron to have a specific form. A logic circuit in a computer has the exact configuration of its gates required for a given calculus. A seed encodes the exact genes. SS-informative spatial still forms* have no entropy. *

A way to rephrase those questions then arises from the argument of the structure of the different scales of the 5^{th} dimension: *is there a situation in which the ∆-1 microstates are less than the ∑∆º macrostates; hence a negative entropic system? *This would imply the existence of ‘multiple futures’ branching from a single potential microscale. If multiple gaseous configurations might give birth to a single macro-state because according to 5D metrics, the micro-state holds more information, and the ‘ghostly’ larger scale is happy just to build itself with part of the existential energy of the microstates; the inverse might hold truth for the lower plane of quantum particles.

This is in fact the case when we consider all the dimensions of the system, the dimension of time and the dimension of scale, in many forms of the Universe. For example, the number of macro-states of life, i.e. variations of organisms that can arise from a single micro-state. So in palingenesis a single ordered micro-state or embryo might give birth to multiple different macro-states.

And ultimately a single micro-state, the 3 topologies of space-time give birth to ∞ macro-state variations, all of them 0-sum worldcycles that return to its fold. So for the whole Universe as a ‘block of time’ entropy is in fact infinitely negative. That is, we depart from two single forms, the line and the cycle, and as Desargues already proved in his theory of conics, all possible curves arise.

Moreover if we take only in consideration the species that ‘survive’, as efficient forms the order is absolute, because there are for such an extensive Universe, a limited number of them that do make the cut and reproduce. I.e. virtual particles are many but elementary particles that repeat its cycles and survive very few. All the existences that have happened will be repeated again as the number of possible existences that last in time are few. In this very moment there are infinite other planets where humans are making machines as ‘enzymen’ to evolve an Earth of metal and die. It is said there are 6 persons that look exactly like you. So when we take entropy into the philosophical arena, with a minimal rigor, the entire conceptual frame of an entropic Universe, dying etc. become meaningless talk.

Creationism is also not the right justification of why entropy exists. The usual creationist reason for it, (a mathematical concept that instead of a mirror of a space-time event is considered is cause) reads like this:

In a thermodynamic system, pressure, density, and temperature tend to become uniform over time because the equilibrium state has higher probability (more possible combinations of microstates) than any other state. This is NOT the reason. The reason is the natural democratic, social evolutionary tendency of all systems of similar T.œs. Molecules ‘share’ their energy to a point in which all of them have a similar quantity, as humans without ‘animetal weapons power’ lived in the Neolithic in ‘thermodynamic equilibrium’ of relative equality. Part of the idol-ogy of capitalism (see papers of history) consists in justifying always as ‘evil’ equality. Thermodynamic equilibrium makes difficult for a higher scale to emerge and oppress the molecules, as a democratic ‘unity’ makes difficult to enslave human beings. But death=no motion of those particles in equilibrium does NOT happen. In their ∆-1 scale they are kicking and acting.

And how they act follows as everything in the Universe the ‘Function of existence’ (5D metrics: SxT=C plus Absolute relativity, S=T), that is the search for constant balances that allow the different SHMotions of reality. For example, 2 key equations are the the **equipartition theorem** that relates the temperature of a system to its average energies. The equipartition theorem is also known as the **law of equipartition**, **equipartition of energy**, or simply **equipartition**. The original idea of equipartition was that, in thermal equilibrium, energy is shared equally among all of its various forms; for example, the average kinetic energy per degree of freedom in Ts- translational motion of a molecule should equal that in St- rotational motion. That is, Ts=St and Ts+St = ST… again.

And yet again, in the ‘asymptotic borders of the quantum ∆-1 scale the equipartition theorem no longer holds since at low temperatures the thermal energy *k*_{B}*T* of certain degrees of freedom are “frozen out” *as order simplifies the superfluous motions that would become ‘friction’ for the quantum world of higher order (and lesser entropy); in a process that continues down all the way through the transformation of the ‘constant of action k (entropic) into the much more ordered O-constant of the quantum world (h-actions of angular momentum)*.

We have then the slightly different theorem for the ‘upper boundary’ between the scale of thermodynamics and that of matter, called the Virial theorem which has been expanded to almost all scales; which in its simplest formulae for stars is a clear proof of the *increase of universal order due to gravitation, as it shows that a gravitational system has ‘negative heat capacity’. *

Indeed, according to the virial theorem, a self-gravitating body like a star or an interstellar gas cloud, the average potential energy *U*_{pot} and the average kinetic energy *U*_{kin} are locked together in the relation* U*_{pot} = -2 *U*_{kin}. Hence thethe total energy *U* (= *U*_{pot} + *U*_{kin}) therefore U = – U_{kin}

If the system loses energy by radiating energy into space, the average kinetic energy actually increases. If a temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy, then the system has a negative heat capacity. An even more extreme version occurs with black holes, which become colder the more mass and energy they absorb; which means they are NOT as Hawking claims, systems of maximal entropy but precisely the opposite, systems of maximal order=in-form-ation; a theme we will discuss in detail on the section of entropy and cosmology, showing the proper way to interpret Hawking’s equations.

The question of how many different positions can adopt is meaningless, as they become ‘one’, like the demonstrators. It doesn’t matter that joe is on the left and Jackie on the right and could change places, what matter is they form an equal, single mass. So what to do about this ‘entropy’ element of all those equations of thermodynamics and its ‘second law’? Frankly NOBODY needs them.

**The real concept of entropy: heat capacity. **

The true thermodynamic parameters come for gases from Boyle’s law: Pv = nkT, which has no entropy anywhere. Entropy IS a man made imaginary value that for the objective understanding of thermodynamics is completely irrelevant and for the Universe at large, false. Its value as it will be studied here is purely philosophical and its interpretation in classic physics wrong. So why we use it on 5D? We use it as a synonymous of death, disorder, and TT-scattering motions. As such we could have used other word, but because entropy as synonymous of disorder is today part of the discourse of all sciences, and the word ‘death’ a big heavy on the mind, we have chosen it for the TT-dimotion that ends the existence of a system. Then obviously when a system dies and disorders the final configuration of its broken cells, disarrayed crystal atoms, etc. might be anything. Who cares? The whole who ordered those parts in a single configuration is gone. But entropy won’t last. As other similar species will feed on them to rise a new supœrganism.

Entropy then in thermodynamics *should be substituted by a more meaningful concept in which its units are measured – heat capacity, Q/T; which is what we will discuss ‘as real’, outside the philosophical realm of the concept of order and disorder (TT). Heat capacity is then important as a physical parameter and secondary to it is the argument of order and temperature that goes as follows: *

The heat capacity of an object, denoted by CC is the limit C =lim T->0 ∆Q/∆T, C=limΔT→0ΔQΔT,where ΔQ∆Q (a form of energy) is the amount of heat that must be added to the object (of mass *M*) in order to raise its temperature by ΔT∆T. Or in other words, *the capacity of a form of matter to absorb and store energy; ultimately dependent of its parameters of ‘existential *energy’, such as ‘more ordered, efficient’ forms of matter (solids) have more storage capacity because they have internally more ‘complex’ form, measured usually as the ‘degrees of freedom’; that is, the different ‘ties’ (∆-1-axons, vibrational paths, etc.) between its atoms.

The classic simplest case is that of mono-atomic, diatomic and triatomic molecules, which become more complex, ordered systems with increasing heat capacities. As each of those new species of ‘social atoms’ can store more energy, it gives away less of it as TT-motion that ‘hits’ the temperature termometer, preserving it for its internal organization. On the other hand a weaker system, a gas system cannot store in its internal order the energy it is given, so it easily gives it away as temperature=motion that hits the walls of the container or the temperature termometer.

In 5D we can write then C= ST (Energy) / TT (entropic temperature). So, ST/TT ≈ S/T= S information /T motion which simply states that a system with higher heat capacity (S>T) is one in which its internal form, its in-formation is higher than its external motion S/T>1.

This is a general rule for any scale. A tighter, smaller, more ordered cyclical O-crystal or solid or higher mass system stores more ‘energy’ because it transforms it into ‘faster and more complex variations of internal motion in a denser network of ties between its parts. So paradoxically those smaller, more efficient forms with ‘more mass’ or ‘more heat capacity’, when disordered into TT (E=Mc2, etc), release more motion than ther seemingly more active, expansive gases of ‘thin air’. And again this relates to 5D metrics: $ x ð = C

The virtue of using the concept of heat capacity instead of entropy is obvious: we are rephrasing the whole subject not in terms of disorder, the preferred humind concept but in terms of order, the preferred universal concept, highlighting those systems of lesser entropy not those of higher entropy, which is also what we shall do using instead of the ‘entropic concept of temperature’, the concept of ‘coldness’, of order, the ß function, which proves to be more fundamental as it can cross beyond the T=0 K as a continuous function without asymptotic discontinuities as temperature does. So we can cross indeed as we shall show in the analysis of thermodynamics of black holes ‘the K=0 barrier’ which is ONLY the limit of thermal, molecular systems, into the world of perfectly ordered internal black holes (top and bcb quarks, bosons, etc.).

What other equation of entropy matters in thermodynamics? One which is ‘pumped up’ in importance as the ‘Fundamental thermodynamic relation, dU=TdS – pdV.

It means that the entropy (heat capacity) of a system depends on its internal energy and its external parameters, such as its volume, which is exactly what we have said in 5D terms. Again the entropic factor here is quite irrelevant, since if we substitute it for the units of heat capacity the TdS element is simplified as T x E/ T = E.

And then because dU is a measure of a type of energy (internal energy), and TdS is converted also in energy, and pdV is also in energy/work units, here it is eas to understand what we talk about. The internal energy of a system changes (dU) in a tug of war between the energy that goes away as temperature that expands it (the old TdS=E factor and the energy that gets in as pressure that reduces its volume, the pdV factor).

In other words, the system looses Existential energy (ST) as entropic temperature (TdS), Ts goes away, as kinetic energy, while it gains it as imploding pressure, St, increases its form. ST= St±Ts.

‘Crystal clear’ in 5D terms as an exchange of dimotions, which are ultimately kinetic Ts explosive-energy vs. St-potential, implosive energy.

We can then interpret the key formula, E=nkT, whereas k is a boltzman unit of entropy, as yet another version of that TdS = Ts formula (however with k now as a spatial still form or constant, that doesn’t vary). The concept behindit is then similar, but only with the Ts-factor, reason why we say this E is not truly Energy (ST) but the ST<Ts<TT, expansive motion absorbed by the external human observer that often confuses ‘locomotion or kinetic energy, Ts and entropy or dual motion, TT’ with energy because it is what it wants to extract from the system (and then convert into ST, human useful energy as it gives it a new form.)

**Nt. 1** on the correspondence principle between 5Ð entropy and information and classic terms. For the so called scholar and systemic scientist information is related to communication, through the work of Shannon. This has nothing to do with our analysis of Form, the inverse function of entropy=disorder achieved in the stillness of a linguistic mind mapping. Form is what we call one of the two limits of reality, the other being pure motion and disorder, which we shall call entropy. So the relationship we establish here is simple, as expressed mathematically by the third law of thermodynamics: when entropy is zero, form is absolute – the image of the mind is shaped in a crystal, a physical mind with zero entropy.

On the other hand when form has motion becomes in-form-action and can be transmitted and reproduced, and then we apply the concepts of Shannon which rightly talked always of communication NOT of the form, that is the information of the message, but of reproduction without errors of a message Transmitted and replicated in two different points of space-time.

So Shannon’s classic paper “*A Mathematical Theory of Communication*” opening with the assertion that “The fundamental problem of communication is that of reproducing at one point, either exactly or approximately, a message selected at another point…”corresponds to the 3rd Dimotion of reproduction.

** **

**THE 5 STATES OF MATTER.**

**SS: Boson state.**

The boson state is the *natural, 5 ^{th} SS-tate of matter (ab.§). In the graph, we can see how it grows through a new Dimension of height=information; and just for fun I put the oldest painting I keep of 5D done in the earlier 90s before this state of matter was known. For an SS-tate to form there is only a property required according to the laws of non-Euclidean 4^{th} postulate of congruence that determines the social evolution of systems into tighter organic forms of maximal density of information: that all forms are undistinguishable of each other. So they all can occupy the same place within a given ‘organization’ in space and time (S=T symmetry). This is indeed the definition Einstein and Bose found for the fifth state of matter. *

This transition to BEC occurs below a critical temperature, which for a uniform 3D volume of gas consisting of non-interacting particles with no apparent internal degrees of freedom – the simplest state – is given by:

∆º (Temperature x Kb) x ∆+1 Mass ó ∆-1 ( 3.3125 h^{2 } n ^{2/3})

if we wish to express it in 5D terms as a feed-back equation between two scales, which gives a better understanding of its deeper meaning: a Bose state is a transition from a thermodynamic plane of space-time (that of Temperature and electron motion) to a lower, more ordered, faster quantum state, *mediated by the higher state of mechanical mass, which induces a higher order by absorbing energy from the electron-temperature scale, thus the electron looses its freedom giving away energy to the lattice and falling after being predated by the higher lattice system down a scale to the quantum order of cooper pairs. *

“Magnetism and superconductivity are natural enemies”. Lindenfeld. Macroscopic magnetization depends upon aligning the electron spins parallel to one another, while superconductivity depends upon pairs of electrons with their spins antiparallel. Cooper Pairs of electrons have a very small binding energy, and external magnetic fields exert torques on the electron spins which tend to break up these pairs

** **

**(TO BE CONT’ED)
**

**THE ∆-1 WORLDCYCLE OF PARTICLES. PALINGENESIS IN TIME.**

**THE PALINGENETIC CYCLE : QUANTUM PHYSICS.**

We left for the end the discussion of the Palingenetic cycle of quantum physics**. **The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Si (size in space) x Ti (volume of information) =k. Since as we become smaller in space paradoxically our time clocks accelerate, and since information is stored in the cyclical patterns and frequencies of those clocks smaller systems code more information, so quantum particles code atoms, genes organisms, memes civilizations and chips machines establishing the essential symbiosis between ∆-1 scales and ∆º super organisms, inscribed in an slower ∆+1 world.

Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

As there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal Universe in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos. Further on, according to the fractal, nested principle any larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the ∆±4 cosmos contains ∆±3 galaxies, which contain ∆±2 solar systems and planets, which contain ∆±1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human ∆º mind languages, contained on our brains, *which according to those metrics* will have a much denser content of information becoming a ‘linguistic Mind-Mirror’ of the whole.

**Symmetry of ∞: Statistic Space Populations = Probabilistic Time Frequency**

The culmination of number theory would be probability in time and statistics in space, the last of the many S=T symmetries between space and time; whereas we can observe in time also ‘scalar’ processes not of multiple populations in social growth, but of multiple events, and not surprisingly both become self-similar, which is the main innovation of 5D, such as *probabilities in the o-1 sphere of time events is equivalent to population laws in the 1-**µ** entropic plane of populations.*

*This law has multiple implications. The most obvious is that it resolves the conundrum of the equivalence between the quantum scale, we measure as a o-1 event probability sphere (because the speed of life and death of its particles according to 5D, SxT=C, is such that we confuse its short-lived populations with time events), and the 1-**µ** entropic cycle of matter (the thermodynamic statistical laws).*

Because the quantum world has 3 ‘Planes’ of beings, the parts (particles), the organic whole (atom) and its social ensemble (laws of molecules and matter or worldcycle), obviously those 3 cycles differ. But its treatment as probabilities vs. statistics still responds to the fundamental equivalence aforementioned.

**Bridging the 5D theory of probability-statistics and the present state of the subject. **

Ultimately what a probability sphere shows is how palingenesis of a repetitive sum of partial events/cells/beings in time accumulates towards the ‘project’ of completing an emerging ∆+1 whole, from its ‘pieces, bits and bites’, which first must be reproduced in enough numbers (statistical accuracy requires an N->∞ frequency of events), and then must collapse along the laws of aggregation, which are described in probability and measure theory.

So the a priori condition for the laws of probability to happen is a massive reproduction of events, the a priori condition for a distribution of populations to become exact in the standard bell curve and its deviations is a massive reproduction of populations. Only then the organic game of existence becomes efficient and exact, while when we deal with minimalist numbers of social events/populations the structures are inefficient, more free, less deterministic. **Its mathematical expression then **considers the ∆-1 plane that of probabilities, which *surface into the population 1-∞ plane only when the event has ‘happened’ with probability 1 and hence becomes a 1-unit of the population plane. *

*It is worth to consider this fact in more detail from a purely mathematical point of view.*

**S=T Symmetry of probability=unit circle and population=1-∞.**

The basic concepts of the theory of probability, namely random events and their probabilities, are completely analogous in their properties to plane figures and their areas. It is sufficient to understand by AB the intersection (common part) of two figures, by A ∪ B their union, by N the conventional “empty” figure, and by P(A) the area of the figure A, whereupon the analogy is complete.

The same remarks apply to the volumes of 3D figures.

The most general theory of entities of such a type, which contains as special cases the theory of volume and area, is usually called **measure theory.**

It remains only to notice that in the theory of probability, in comparison with the general theory of measure or in particular with the theory of area and volume, there is a certain special feature: A probability is never greater than one. This maximal probability holds for a necessary event U: **P (U) =1**

The symmetry o≤1≥∞ is then a fundamental graph of the fifth dimension. Let us see how with a simple example of Disomorphisms between certain points of the unit circle and the 1-∞ complex plane:

Mirror symmetries between a 0’-1 universe and a 1-∞ are interesting as they set two different ‘limits’, an upper uncertain bound for the 1-∞ universe, in which the 1-world, ∆º exists, and a lower uncertain bound for the 0’-1 Universe, where the 1 does not see the limit of its lower bound. Are those unbounded limits truly infinite?

We can consider it in terms of the homology of both the microscopic and macroscopic worlds.

Of course the axiomatic method ‘believes’ in infinity – we deal with the absurdities of Cantorian transinfinities in articles on numbers. But as we consider maths, after Lobachevski, Gödel and Einstein, an experimental science; we are more interested in the homologies of ∆±1. For one thing. While 0 can be approached by infinite infinitesimal ‘decimals’, so it seems it can never be reached, we know since the ‘violet catastrophe’ that the infinitesimal is a ‘quanta’, a ‘minimum’, a ‘limit’. And so we return to Leibniz’s rightful concept of an 1/n minimal part of ‘n’, the whole ‘1’.

It implies by symmetry that *on the upper bound, the world-universe in which the 1 is inscribed has also a limit, a discontinuity with ∆+2, which sets up all infinities in the upper bound also as finite quanta, ‘wholes of wholes’.*

One of the most important S=t symmetries of the mathematical Universe is the one between time probabilities in the 0=1 unit circle and the 1-∞ plane of statistical populations (space-points), as it is both, *a symmetry between the ∆-1 scale of finitesimals (unit circle, where a finitesimal, 1/n is defined as the inverse of a real number of the 1-∞ plane); and one between time-cycles and space-planes (topological **symmetry).*

The conjunction of Euclidean geometry with a focus in the c@rtesian graph world represents the best way to consider ∆-Planes, as the most beautiful of those scalings *is already incorporated on it, giving us the key ‘∆-symmetry, between the 0’-1 unit circle and the 1-∞ larger ∆+1 scale, which have a natural correspondence – as the maths that work in the 0’-1 unit circle work on the 1-∞ scale, with 3 differences: *

*The unit circle has a defined membrane, but its minimalist infinitesimal ‘decimal’ is not defined, inversely, the 1-∞ scale has the minimal infinitesimal 1 defined but the ∞ element is not so those are the elements for a best choice of ‘mental geometry’ to study a problem depending on which element we do know, the ‘singularity 0’-undefined, 1-defined’ and the membrane, 1-closed, ∞-open.*- A unit circle is a ð-cyclical/polar geometry, the 1-∞ scale is an open unconstrained one, another choice for solution of problems depending on its characteristics.
- A unit circle is ∆-1. The 1-∞ scale is ∆+1, with the 1-membrain as the open or closed border among them.

The Unity circle where 1 is ∞ and 0, the unreachable ‘quanta’ of the ∆-1 scale is the best mirror symmetry between a self-centered ‘polar’ mind and its universe (1-∞ region). In maths in fact most processes that matter can be in geometry proved by a bidimensional informative (holographic principle) graph, and most key processes of space-time world cycles, can be observed to happen in the 4 first digit, around the three key number (e+e/10=3, π-apertures of the cycle=3 and so on).

When we extend the domain of the unit circle to the complex plane with its bidimensional holographic numbers, the concept of a ‘world’ represented now by the higher dimensionality of the Riemann sphere (unit circle of the complex plane) is clearer, as every point of the sphere communicates with one point of the Complex plane, while* the 0 point of the sphere becomes the inverse of the ∞ point of the ‘complex plane’. In this manner as in projective geometry, the o-mind point becomes the mind-mirror of the ∞ real Universe:* O-point mind x ∞ Universe = constant world.

Leibniz’s monads, which do not communicate, are the simplest fractal points, as minds=mirrors of the Universe, where ‘each point is a world in itself.’

In mathematical number theory, we say that: The interval o-1 is the same ∆-1 infinity that the interval 1-∞. Cartesian points in that sense were for the pioneers of science, more than a mathematical artifact, but the mathematical mind in itself looking at the time-space Universe.

*When we look at quantum systems we observe an ensemble of time states NOT space states.*

*All this means when we look at quantum physics we are not seeing most of the time, spatial organisms but time events, and hence we must interpret many events of quantum physics as if they were sequences in time. This might be odd but it is essential to a proper understanding of many of the processes taken place in quantum physics including some of the most puzzling relationships.*

*For example, when we see quarks we are not seeing 3 quarks but the same quark in 3 states of time, reason why we cannot easily break them. Only with enormous energy we can reproduce those quarks and then have them as separated entities.*

*When we observe a path of a quantum system, we are observing multiple time paths, not multiple spatial particles, reason why we observe only one event at the end when the experiment collapses into a single story, but we can calculate in palingenesis, as in the case of morphological development all its potential paths which will give birth to different trajectories, of which only one, the most probable event, which obeys the laws of ‘last time’ of Lagrangians (not of least space) will come.*

*When we study a process mediated by the weak force, we are observing an event of trans-form-ation and evolution of particles in time not in space, reason why its coupling constant is a time constant and the process takes place without apparent distance in space, as it is the transformation of a particle.*

*So physicists just unaware of the fundamental properties of space-time, namely its S=T symmetry, given their difficulty to understand time events and time dimotions, which they reduce to a single one, are just having so to speak often an inverted view of those 2 parameters. *

**(to be cont’ed)**

** **

**THE 5 FORCES OF THE GALAXY AS EXPRESSION OF ITS 5 DIMOTIONS.**

The same problems arise in the analysis of forces. *For a lineal thinker *the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So *all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet fact tells us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. *But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal dimotion of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, *but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to *compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

Our next statements then should surprise the reader and enrage the professional physicist, but while measures in physics are extremely accurate, modeling of the whys of those measures and an all encompassing, true NON-reductionist theory of everything is very poor. So one moves between the awe that the machines of measure and calculus of locomotions in physics inspire and the humorous criticism the explanation of ‘everything’ with locomotion brings to the more evolved philosopher of the 5 Dimensional Universe.

It is however imperative to do some criticism first, if we want to know the WHYS of physics (which Feynman infamously said we should never ask – meaning really physicists didn’t know them: ‘if you say you understand quantum physics then certainly you don’t’ ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never ask’, ‘physicists use the same gauge theory to explain all forces, not because the Universe always repeat itself, but because we were so dumb we never came up with anything else’ (quoting from memory), and finally from Landau, its Soviet counterpart, and my fav teacher – I developed the model of 5Ð physics in my youth annotating his 11 books encyclopedia… ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’, ‘For physicists there is no uncertainty of time, we look at our (human) clock and always know the time it is’…

We shall then consider only with harsh criticism as it goes to the core of our view of the Universe, the big-bang, which is the epitome of Landau’s dictum, a form of pseudo-science which is not right but has become a religion we shall not doubt of it, akin to ‘biblical capitalism’ and ‘biological creationism’, all forms of *egocy, natural to the humind and all the ‘Schopenhauer’s stupids’ that believe the language, mirror of the Universe – mathematics in the big-bang creationism, money in capitalist creationism, words that God utters to create in Abrahamic religions, have the power to ‘create reality’, instead of space-time. *

In the graph below we can see how this dark, gluon-top quark soup (toplet liquid) of a gas-9 reaction (black hole quasar explosion), neatly reclassifies properly the 3 families of increasing mass in the Universe:

The reordering of the strange and top quark triangles of mass define the symmetry between the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales of ‘atoms and galaxies’, in terms of its ∆-1 components (quarks).

The existence of 2 x 3 mass families responds to:

- the ternary topologic & scalar symmetry between the 3 parts of the organic galaxy – Halo of strangelets, nucleus of Black hole stars and vital space of ud-light atoms and…
- The duality of quantum particles and cosmic galatoms:

The human scale Light atoms are made of ud quarks. Heavy black cb-atoms atoms make the cosmic black hole scale. Whereas the Strange and Top quark, act as the ‘central nucleus’ of the most perfect, heavier stars, pulsars, and largest, galactic black ‘stars’ (black holes), whose 3 varieties we shall study latter in great detail.

**Informative ∆±1 forces. Scalar similarity between protons and black holes, strong and gravitational forces.**

*This symmetry extends to its combined forms, as gluon become symmetric to mesons. So in the atomic scale, the carriers of the internal strong force *are color+anticolors=gluon particles-antiparticles, ‘feeding’ the reproduction of quarks. *While in the cosmic scale* the carriers of the strong gravitational force inside ‘black stars’ (formerly black holes) are the nonets of pairs of particles+antiparticles= mesons, feeding through the weak force (W, Z, H bosons) the heavier BT quarks.

In the graph ∆-1: ud quarks = ∆+1 cb quarks. ∆-1: Gluons = ∆+1 mesons. ∆-1: protons = ∆+1 black holes.

Thus, the force that transforms particles between scales, responsible for the 4th Ðimotion of evolution and generation of heavier particles or its 5D inverse Devolution is the weak force that mediates all those processes. It is not really a force but an evolutionary process that happens in a single point of space (right side), where the intermediate state of higher energy mass (W, z, H boson) gives birth to heavier fermions.

In the next, the strong and gravitational ¡±1 forces are similar in the limiting ±¡ quantum and cosmological scale. They both ‘absorb’ and in-form into denser entities, lighter particles, to collapse them in the central black holes=cosmic nucleon region or quarks=quantum nucleon regions: From left to right, the identity between the nonet of gluons and mesons on both scales, the WRONG procedure of reductionist physics, which models all forces with the lineal concept of electromagnetism through an exchange of particles, as the weak force happens in a single point, hence it is a transformation guided by information; in the right the proper way to understand particle-antiparticles, as the relative dimotion of life and death that closes a physical world cycle (Feynman). The hypothesis of work for the model of the fractal Universe is simple: a galaxy is self-similar to an atom, and so are the different forces interacting within and outside them:

1.The* strong force is similar to the gravitational force* in the extremal conditions of the black star. Reason why both are non-lineal.

2, The *¥ force is similar to the expansive dark energy* between galaxies, which therefore is NOT the same force than gravitation, reason why the expansion between galaxies is a lineal force and it is similar to electromagnetism

3.The* weak interaction is NOT a Locomotion,* force but a process of evolution of particles, guided by the Dimotion of information, reason why it happens in the same spacetime, and so its bosons, W, Z, H are ‘states’ of the same particle, NOT carriers.

4.The proton has in 5D the same metric that a black hole, is self-similar to a black hole, with a Schwarzschild radius. So happens with the electron in its particle state (Carter). We will expand on ‘black hole stars’ latter.

- Antiparticles are the inverse death=entropy moment of particles=lifetime, reason why we see less of them in terms of an ST-dual perspective, as we see less ‘dying corpses’, which is an event that last a quanta of time that living beings, which last longer. So since S-populations of particles-organisms and antiparticles-corpses are the same but its time duration is different, T(p)>> T(anti-p), ST(p)>>ST(anti-p). Te that fact we add the fact that if we model, as we shall do black holes as Tbc quark stars of the heavy decuplet, as CERN recently found up Bottom and charm quarks that should form heavier Dark atoms, decay more often into particles of our ‘lighter’ ∆-1 light scale. Because time is cyclical and local, and
*the dimotion of future information is inverse to the local dimotion of past-entropy that dissolves form, we represent as Feynman did, antiparticles as local travels to the past.*

We model black holes as protons of a larger ‘galactic scale’, strong forces as extremal gravitational forces, gluons as mesons, dark energy as electromagnetism and complete by self-similarity ALL the questions of physics, as we either perceive from within the “galacell”, the internal region of an atom, and outside the atom, the external region of the *galacell*. So the identity between the nonets of gluons in the strong force and mesons in the larger scale of quarks, coupled with the concept of particles-antiparticles forming a local world cycle renders a clear-cut theory of black holes as protons of a larger scales, in which the transformation through the weak force of light matter into heavier quark matter will produce a black hole star of heavy dark matter; whose heavy quarks happen to decay a 20% more often into particles than antiparticles (CERN), resolving the p-¬p problem.

**The quark-gluon model and its meson extension to the ∆+1 black hole inner region of strong gravitation. **

*This symmetry extends to its combined forms, as gluon become symmetric to mesons. So in the atomic scale, the carriers of the internal strong force *are color+anticolors=gluon particles-antiparticles, ‘feeding’ the reproduction of quarks. *While in the cosmic scale* the carriers of the strong gravitational force inside ‘black stars’ (black holes) are the nonet of particles+antiparticles pairs = mesons, feeding through weak forces (W, Z, H bosons) heavier BT quarks. So we are talking of the strongest ‘TT-feeding’ dimotion of the Universe. The attraction that quarks have is an action of feeding; the antiparticle state is a state of dying, which in 5D pentalogic can be seen also as a devolution back to a simpler past, hence a travel to the past. And here again the fact that humans see it all in terms of its ternary charge clocks as present space and time, stop and go discontinuous perception makes difficult to streamline all those events. But essentially what we observe if we were to invert the S=T perception of those events, fixing the gluons in still-form and moving the predator quarks, is the motion of a quark that feeds into a gluon and changes its form to a different quark. So the strong force is a feeding force that transforms an U quark into a D quark by absorption of a gluon, and so on. We can only outline here this fertile field for future 5D.

** **

**CONCLUSION.** **EXPANDING THE LIMITS OF HUMIND’S ON TIME AND SPACE. **

Poets understood better: Time present and time past… Are both perhaps present in time future, And time future contained in time past. If all time is eternally present /All time is unredeemable. (Elliot, quartets)

In Einstein’s work we talk of a block of time, as all measures are simultaneous present measures.

In 5D, time is both a present repetitive motion and a dual motion from past to future to past. All together give a zero sum worldcycle as all systems emerge and return after death to dust of space-time.

Time is motion=change, any kind of time=change. If we consider the Universe made of two parameters, time=motion and space=dimensional form, then we can combine them in dualities according to range to obtain the 5 ‘dimensional motions’ of reality; SS, internal and external stillness, or pure form, as in a seed of information or a still linguistic mind-mapping of the Universe, becomes then the only state of no change or minimal change in the Universe. While in the other extreme, TT, internal and external change, or ‘scattering’ or entropy becomes the purest form of absolute time=motion. It follows then that Entropy ‘erases’ form, and SS-minds ‘stop or try to stop time=change’, converted into memorial information. Between those two poles of language and entropy, we can then consider two gradiations, Ts-locomotion dominant in external Time=change, and St, information, still from an outer perspective even if internally a mind perceives and changes, and finally ST, a perfect balance of form and motion, the ‘present’ state when time and space superpose each other or become complementary.

Those are deep-thought conceptual elements of ‘logic’ for the understanding of time and the Universe in a very different perspective to that usual today – the digital description of the Universe with digital machines and numbers. How then such two radical ways to observe the first principles of reality, time and space, can refer to the same? Because the Universe is complex and its properties and languages are multiple but humans are rather single-‘minded’ and so have a hard time to qualify a phenomena in all its complexity. And nothing is more difficult to comprehend for humans that time=change even if it is the ‘first substance’ of reality.

In dealing with Time=change as Plato noticed mankind is astray. Even if we pass the first hurdle -human egocy (ego=idiocy), which makes us believe the doodles in the sand of truth we drew, from Plato to Einstein are all what matters about time; and return humbly to explore the first principles seeking for a more profound exploration of time=motion, it will always remain the fact *man is a mind of information and ‘Spatial, stil minds’* are the opposite function to that of pure motion= time. So humans tend to ‘believe’ only the ‘material, objectual world’. So the 2 limits of minds – egocy, the belief each mind that measures from a subjective point of view is the center of the Universe, and all what it sees with a language-mirror of that Universe is all what exists; and as a consequence of this, the confusion of still, simplified forms with the whole – will be difficult to overcome.

Humans confuse reality with its mirror languages so at each time on the adventure of knowledge they felt they knew it all, because they could not see beyond their evolution of the languages of thought, which today are extremely primitive (Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic of single causality, evolved in our texts of formal sciences). And this is today the case of ‘time experts’ – they use lineal time causality, and single space continuums and cannot even imagine that is a very small part of reality. Few of the so called scholars will even recognize they know near nothing about time – the best of them Mr. Einstein said ‘time is what a clock measures’. In that regard, physicists with its astounding reduction of all time motions of the Universe to those related to motion=change in space, are very knowledgeable about clocks indeed, *but time is NOT what a clock measures. *The clock is just an instrument that measures 3 properties of time=motion. Its regularity or cyclical patterns as all clocks return to its origin; its motion, as all clocks move and time is motion; and its stop and go ‘space and time’ duality. As all in the Universe constantly switches between states of space=form and time=motion.

Clocks measure only a ‘flow’ of motion, divided into fractions for man to ‘think he can control time’, which of course it never does. But as languages are mirrors of reality, when scientists decided that the properties of the clock were all the properties of time, they reduced time causality to irrelevancy – to the point that today’s physicists such as Hawking, deny time causality exists. And further on, as clocks have regular form, the in-form-ative variations of those cycles were eliminated. Only digital properties of time were left over. And because causality which is what moves time=change disappeared finally time was used merely to measure ‘translation in present-space’ with ‘instantaneous derivatives. So it became the ‘4^{th} dimension of space’, when in fact, it is ‘present space’, a slice in a cycle of time, a lineal step of a time cycle, what is dependant on time-motions.

Let us define time beyond humind egocy and machines. Time is motion of any kind, ‘transformation’, change in form (evolution is also time), translation in space, is of course time. *All is ultimately time because wherever we look, things in detail move, particles are cyclical motions and so the Universe is made of time=motion. *

Today science has become – even if scientists don’t understand it – technology. That is, science is no longer so much the search for truth and knowledge, but the evolution of a different ‘digital mind’ with a different language, which maps out reality with numbers instead of words, in the more accurate language of machines.

Scientists construct a digital mind that mirrors reality in a different way to howhuman eye> wor(l)ds map out our human space and time. And while the visual mind of machines is similar in structure – an electronic mind-mapping based in colors and ‘membranes’ that separate forms; albeit expanded to all the scales of the fifth dimension by telescopes and microscopes; the language we use today to measure time, digital numbers is *radically different from the way words depicture time, in terms of logic causality, with past, present and future tenses.*

*A mechanical clock does not include in its properties the logic causality of time events. *So we loose a huge field of basic properties about time when we think as Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’ and as Galileo who first used the clock to measure time, think that time is just a parameter to measure locomotion in space, v=s/t. The problem though for modern man is that he has lost so much its intellectual, verbal capacity to understand time events and causality, and his machines have evolved so much the digital mind that what we attempt in those texts, to build a more comprehensive theory of time, its different ‘motions’ and its causal logic laws, which will turn out to be common to all species of the Universe; will be both, difficult to understand and not considered strictly science in terms of Planck’s dictum ‘all what cannot be measured does not exist’… ‘Cogito ergo sum’ having left long ago his place to ‘vidi, credo ergo sum’… we face with time causality the most profound limit to present man: causality is NOT measured with numbers but is based in logic patterns, often biological and so we cannot construct as physicists did a comprehensive theory of time=motion=change from numbers. This can reach as far as physicists reached. An accurate system to measure time and space distances without the slightest conceptual understanding of the much wider processes involved in the origin of time=change.

We must reconstruct from scratch our knowledge of time=change, because the arrival of lineal time and the mechanical clock unlike in the case of space, meant a complete destruction of all what we had learned about time causality. The errors of mechanism thus feature heavily in this paper as one of the key elements to straighten up to refocus the concept of time in physics.

Of those errors, the ‘logic error’ of loosing causality is just one of many. Two other errors matter as much: the loss of a ‘sense of cyclicality’ as Galileo ‘elongated’ the time cycles of clocks into the mathematical ‘creationist’ graph of Cartesian space-time, which next, Newton confused with space-time itself, converting the language mirror (the graph) into the Universal background. This lead to the error of making space and time absolute, pointed out by Leibniz who had the proper model for ‘relational time’ and ‘space’, we shall depart from in those texts. Other errors followed: the loss of information when substituting repetitive frequency time by lineal time even if they are inverse formulae (T=1/ƒ) as we loose the understanding of the discontinuity between the ‘steps’ of a wave of time – or in the case of rotary motion, the capacity of the time cycle to break space into infinite vital spaces surrounded by those ‘time cycles’…

We shall stop here but trust me, we could fill up dozens of pages and we will, with the errors physicists commited describing time. So many that it has always amazed me how *humans don’t notice them.*

The reason will always be the egocy paradox, which is the source of most errors, including the creationist error that confuses a mind with the whole Universe.

*This is as today the biggest error of all sciences, and it is called ‘the digital, computer error’:*

Huminds, which as we said are increasingly reduced to their roles as ‘enzymen’, men that catalyze the evolution of digital minds and confuse this new world-mapping with the ultimate reality (when it is just another ‘mind-monad’ looking with a different perspective to the whole), could be interested in such an expansion of its consciousness on the workings of the most important element of reality, time of which we are all made. I doubt it. Still is worth to try to communicate all what I found about the meaning of time.

But in case you attempt to read this and many other papers you have to ‘let go’… your simpleton picture of reality as described by humans so far, regardless of the details obtained with those sensorial machines. Since ultimately the ‘causes’ of time=change in a Universe perfectly ordered, are so different from the chaotic picture humans have of it that only a deep humility about our role in the cosmos and admiration for the extraordinary intelligence of the ‘game of existence’ in time we all play can let you cross the doors of 5D time. Plato forbade entering its academia those who didn’t understand numbers, reason why today he is the hero of digital minds. Aristotle though went much further reason why he was never understood. He was not so much interested in quantity and numbers but in life and quality, ‘a habit, not an action’ he said.

But that is how the humind far less ‘intelligent=creative=critical=destructive’ and more ‘repetitive=memorial’ as the fractal Universe works. It just needs a bit of egocy to ‘detach itself’ from direct experience and then anything goes, any imprinting of virtual modeling in the brain becomes truth – the weirdest religion, ideology or scientific model. And what will come out of this pages at the end is the fact that the model mankind has of physical time is among the weirdest interpretations of nature as it is, possible by ‘imagination’ – even if physicists ‘believe’ they are the most rational, experimental of all sciences.

This is a given of egocy. I recall when young to run always in trouble with teachers as I pointed out systematically errors on their classes – that is, facts they stated without proof, which logically seemed absurd. It all started in math classes when a professor tried to explain us the concept of limit, as I explain in our paper on algebra*. *As this was the only fun I had sitting on the back benches once they took away my rubick cube; finally I got discharged and the professor promised me to pass with honors if I didn’t ridicule him anymore. I was not just a provocateur though. I had read Darwin carried to class NOT a book of notes but a book to annotate errors. It was then to me evident that errors divided in several groups but the most profound were those of ‘creationism’ (the language substituting reality, as in the case of the Cartesian artefact that became the space-time of physics – a topic of religion where Allah and Yavweh both create ‘naming’ things). It is unfortunately one error caused by the paradox of the mind and its egocy that confuse a language and its mental image with reality – so we see information still and think the Earth doesn’t move, etc… but cannot be resolved without a lot of humility and self-reflection that religious and scientific dogmatic people lack. Still let us imagine the reader has some of those characteristics to go further and accepts this kind of errors. Then he will have to face two more:

The first book I ever self-published was in fact called ‘the Error of Einstein’, which granted me zero reviews (: it was not meant an ‘error’ in the sense of a wrong model but in the sense of the ‘part of a measure’ ignored in a physical metric system – in this case the entire 5^{th} dimension of scalar space-time and its ‘dark spaces’, which I calculated easily with the laws of existential logic as 100% less π-3/π=96%. *That was the part of the Universe ideally any mental finitesimal point does NOT see of the total information that surrounds him. *Latter on it was confirmed that the Universe had 96% of dark matter unperceived with light>electronic senses.

There was then the second type of errors of which 4D time was guilty: the error of postulates without proofs from where a ‘model starts’, because they seem (to some) self-evident. Here it was the ‘postulate’ that c-speed was the limit of speed in the Universe. Really Mr. Einstein? Have you gone with your mechanical clock just a bit further than Earth to measure that speed? And have you gone through all the scales of reality?

But to destroy the errors of the mind is relatively easy. The true task ahead is the opposite function: to create an alternative model better than the one you have destroyed. And that took me a bit more time.

We will then consider here the alternative model and the solutions and expansions to all the time theories of physics as we keep enlarging the paper that are better models, thanks to the expansion brought about by 5D metrics and the scalar structure of space and cyclical nature of time.

The process will be slow, as there are no significant readers so far to this project and my health, work-ethics and interest to communicate dwindle, but as we enter the second age, and have laid down the basic facts of the general model, *there is enough punch in those papers if ‘egocy’ and ‘routine’, ‘creationism’ and the tribal idols from Newton to Einstein would not blind the scholar, besides my own gross errors on the ‘chicago manual’ quality of the texts.*

They will first start with conceptual upgrading and latter on I will fill the equations, hopefully as I find the old notebooks of my youth. I will rumble as that is how my mind works these days and hopefully clean up the act once the 4 stage process of putting blocks from old files, rewrite them in a single language, clarifying the concepts, introduce the mathematics on it, is completed – then the thing should collapse.

This said, for all those who just want to read what they already know and expand of it, there is nothing here. As we will study a completely different upgraded view of time with 5 ‘dimensional motions’, 5 Dimotions.

As we said the way to look at it – at the ‘big bang and 4D einstein’s and quantum physics revis(it)ed of this pages – requires humility, the very rare capacity to doubt of all what you consider truth, but it is not.

We thus study what time has in common for all 5D stiences – the whole worldcycle of existence of all systems and its common laws. We will tudy time in physics, from the big-bang, entropic dead of galaxies. We adapt the work of Einstein in 4D time that completes 400 years of digital measures of locomotion to the expansion of knowledge that 5D represents. Since contrary to belief a general theory of time but the analysis of one of the 5 Dimotions of time, locomotion for physical entities that move closer to the limit of transmission of information on the galaxy – c speed, hence specific of the stience of physics not of the whole reality.

The Universe in time is the sum of ∞ worldcycles of life and death of space-time organisms. One of those worldcycles, the death of galaxies, is confused with a larger non-existent worldcycle, the supposed birth of the Universe (cosmic big-bang) due to the current view of ‘Lineal Time’ about the nature of reality.

This, paradoxically the science that worst understands time is the one more obsessed by it – physics; since it reduces the 5 Dimensional motions of time space to only one, locomotion with the Galilean formula, V=s/t corrected slightly in Einstein’s relativity with the ad on of –ct for high speeds.

Without understanding the symmetry of Space=Time due precisely to the proper comprehension of the paradox of relativity (we cannot distinguish S-formal states of space from T-moving states; so both things happen simultaneously), physicists were just obsessed with measures of motion from the humind still, spatial point of view, for practical purposes – from where relativity paradoxes came, as the speed of the emitter did not add to the speed of the message – due to the entanglement in stillness between the particles that emit and receive information at the ∆-¡ quantum scale.

This realist solution to relativity speed paradoxes shows a fundamental limit to physics of time-space – the lack of a clear understanding of the cyclical nature of time clocks and the fractal scalar nature of space. So we need first to introduce 5D themes before we even attempt to analyze the 5 dimotions of timespace of physical systems in its 3 scales, the thermodynamic human, ∆º, the cosmological, gravitational, ∆+1 and the ∆-1 atomic scales.

In that regard the main difference between 5D and 4D time is obvious: in 5D time is cyclical as all the clocks of time are, and further on, because a time clock closes space into an inner and outer form, ‘dissecting it’ (first law of topology), there are infinite time cycles and broken vitl spaces, included within it. This gives the Universe a scalar form, and so the question about the big-bang observations is obvious: as we measure everything in local galactic terms: it is the big-bang a galactic cycle or a supposed cycle that affects the entire Universe.

The amazing ultimate truth about time is its repetitive causal patterns that allow to predict the future of all systems, when we combine the different time ‘scales’ that co-exist and through complex causality create that repetitive future. The fact that all systems of nature go through the same worldcycles of existence; that all what will happen has happened, that ultimately reality is a block of time.

And then study also the worldcycles of life and death that order sequentially those 5 dimotions, from SS-eeds, through the 3 ages of organisms, the young Ts-age of locomotion, the ST-reproductive age, the St-informative age and the TT-entropic age that apply also to the 3 scales of matter, which form together 3 worldcycles of consecutive growth, the palingenetic, time oriented quantum cycle (reason why it is studied with time probabilities), the ST-entropic cycle of life of matter and its 5 states, from ∆-1 TT-plasma, through Ts-gas, ST-liquid, St-solid and final collapse into SS-quark matter, which give birth to the 3^{rd} transcendental, organic cycle of evolution of galaxies, a ‘system of reproduction’ of quark dark matter as we are just ud-light matter enclosed between the central BCB and top quark ‘positive’ matter black holes of ultra dense atoms, and the halo of ‘negative’ charged strangelet, themselves ‘atoms’ of a larger hyper-universe in the infinite scales of reality.

We analyzed in philosophy of physics why such a fractal organic Universe is so alien to huminds: Earlier physicists since Galileo, due to their worldly profession – the production of entropic weapons and search for maximal lineal range of cannon shots – established the dictatorship of lineal inertia as the goal of physical systems in search of maximal motion and used the digital mechanical clock as the only method of measuring time, reducing the causality of the 3±¡=5 Dimotions of timespace already known to Aristotle that ‘flux’ into a point to create reality. This has been masked for very long with the exhaustion of the analysis of ‘lineal time’ with clocks, which is like portraying the entire Universe with cubist paintings of enormous quality that mask all other forms of the Universe.

**The barebones of 5d physics and space-time.**

In the future we will keep expanding those physical papers introducing more properties of living matter and adding to the mix new layers of mathematics. So far we have in a few pages, with the simplest possible mathematical formulation to reach the highest audience; resolved the main conceptual questions pending on physics, from the Unification equation of charges and masses, to the reason why there are 3 families of masses and particles, to the reason why there are 3 type of celestial bodies, to the hierarchy problem of forces, as gravitation is a much ‘lighter’ cosmological scale with far less attractive power, to the question of why we see less antiparticles (which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time, so as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles), to the question of c-speed that illuminates the bizarre nature of spin and entanglement, to the meaning of Universal constants, the conundrum of singularities, to a better more logic explanation of reality than the bizarre big-bang… All this should suffice for scientists to realize the importance of having a better foundational system of principles to explain reality. But as we know, since Kuhn’s ‘Scientific revolutions’, science is a human endeavor based in belief, repetition and routine, so it will take decades for physicists or AI to change ‘their chip’ and accept 5D. Likely they won’t; but that is not a problem of the Universe but of the short-comings of egocy and the humind and the present age of Entropy in history we live, so far away from the ‘crystal mind’ of perfect form of SS-God, the program of existence and all of us, its details.

As it happened 30 years ago when I first proposed this expansion of our models of the Universe to dozens of Universities without any interest on their side; *if humans were not mentally handicapped by their egocy and lineal, one-dimensional mind, there is here enough food for thought to spark a global interest on academia, as it was the case with the short ‘appendix’ of Descartes to his discourse on method on ‘Analytical geometry’. * So we shall end with his words ‘I hope that posterity will judge me kindly, not only as to the things, which I have explained but also as to those which I have intentionally omitted so as to leave to others the pleasure of discovery.” – Rene Descartes.