Home » ∆³ Mind: Mathematical Physics

# ∆³ Mind: Mathematical Physics

SUMMARY

Introduction: 5D Universe in a nutshell. The life of matter. Its mathematical minds. Relativity paradoxes.

Minds of Matter: Its hardware: Non-Euclidean points From particles to black holes.

Its software: The stientific method. The function of existence. Conservation of energy & form. Pentalogic.

The philosophy of science of physicists. From creationism to constructivism.

The language of mathematics in physics. Its 3 ages: co-evolution of math and physics.

The age of Euclidean Physics and calculus in the human scale. Mechanics, Thermodynamics revis(it)ed.

The age of non-Euclidean physics, topology and group theory beyond the human scale: Quantum & relativity.

The true mind of physics. Qbits, quark minds, electronic perception, digital thought.

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.” Einstein, on the entangled ∆@st man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and mind’ languages

I hope posterity will judge me kindly, not only as to the things, which I have explained but also as to those which I have omitted so to leave others the pleasure of discovery.” – Descartes.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is really all what is about. If we call Space=form and time=motion, S and T, then we can write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t), according to which each species made of spatial energy and temporal form tries to maximize its survival, in a point of balance in which its ‘exi=stential force’ is maximal; avoiding the extremal points of TT-entropy=death. This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating ∞ local present variations that put together form reality. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5th Dimension an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism or General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which we also use as the acronym of the Generator of Space-Time.

The papers to be posted at Academia.edu within 3 years (1st year past) build up an Encyclopedia of Space-time organisms in Exi:St¡ence’ – each science studying the species of one scalar space-time plane of the fractal Universe. All will be described with the same scalar laws of 5D cyclical time and fractal space, introduced in the first 30 pages. So we shall write for each ‘stience’ from quantum physics to the galaxy, through biology, history & economics, and the formal stiences dominant in space (Mathematics) and time (illogic papers on the Universe=reality as a whole) 5 ‘dimensional papers’ for a total of 30, each one to become time permitted a 300 pg. volume. This is the work plan.

As that won’t happen likely, time being of the essence, I had prioritized the most important and neglected of all organisms – that of mankind in time=History, which is fairly well done, and that of the Universe=reality as a whole. While the last to be posted is the less important and more developed by huminds, physics. Since I release copyrights ‘rights’, any University can take upon the project whenever they wish to complete the encyclopedia of stience in ±10.000 pages, connecting all stientific laws to the simple trinity and pentalogic laws of the 5D ∆ST Universe. They certainly could do a much better job that I will. If they learned first 5D. L§

THE 5D UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL: ∆S@T OF SPACE-TIME.

Astro+physics describes the supœrganism of the galaxy and its 3 matter scales and stiences: ∆+1 gravitational cosmology; ∆ø, thermodynamic, geologic matter & ∆-1, quantum, atomic organisms.

The field is immense, fascinating and hardly explored with the proper rigor that merges the scalar laws of the fifth dimension and those of mathematical physics, adding to the mix the organic co-existing, vital properties of matter and sentient elements of the linguistic minds of physics that guide the ‘actions=dimotions’ of its ensembles.

As the Universe is a living organism, gifted with a body, and a mind, logos (Plato), of a higher logic than man (Augustine); the non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian pentalogic of points with parts, crossed by ∞ parallels of ST-energy and St-information that evolve together into social wholes, and perform the 5 dimotions of life.

So we shall describe the life of matter in the 3 main scales of social wholes in this paper.

The first scale: Particles and its languages of communication: Strong and electronic forces.

But what is life? As defined in any book of biology life is any form that follows the 5 dimensions or drives of existence, which happen to be exactly the 5 Dimensional motions of space-time, ab. dimotions of the Universe:

-Ss: Life perceives form; St-life processes information; ST-life reproduces, Ts-life moves, Tt-life feeds entropically.

Where life starts is immediate; in the 2 minimal particles of the Universe, St-quarks of maximal density of information and Ts-electrons of maximal motion, which become the ‘2 first genders’ that come together into St+Ts=ST-atoms balanced in an eternal present as an immortal species.

The minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (time motions with dimensional, spatial form) that define ‘classic life’ in biology – where they are call ‘drives’ of life, and we have defined: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). In the graph, a quark reproduces itself.

Hence the minimal units of life of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms are particles. And we shall study them as with any other biologic system, with all the languages of mankind, the best S-patial mathematical language; the best T-emporal language causal verb and its best ST-mixture –visual languages.

5D will add little to the exhaustive mathematical analysis of matter (which is not a proof of an abstract nature for matter, as biology also describes mathematically many of its forms) its discoveries of topological evolution and non-Euclidean geometry, the key new mathematical stiences of 5D space-time. But the bulk of our discoveries will concern the organic properties of matter shown in its topo-logic structural forms and biological functions (those 5 drives of existence), explained with with words using the pentalogic method that considers any event in time or form in space from the perspective of those 5 Dimotions of space-time. Then a 2nd revision will add ‘mathematical insights and equations which are often inflationary. That is, we find often in physics different mathematical models of the same physical system that correspond to the different organic parts, scales and dimotions of the event or phenomena describe, as in gravitation’s 5 p.o.v. that we shall see describe the 5 Dimotional perspectives of mass (St-Newton, Tt-Poisson, Ts-Lagrange, ST-Hamilton, Ss-Einstein). But lets not get ahead too fast, as we need a basic ‘repetitive mandala’ introductory to all 5D papers on the metric equations of the 5th dimension of Universal scales and the ST-equations of absolute relativity that define together the ‘function of exist¡ence’ (survival program) of the Universe that all ‘stientific species follow’ – we just wrote with the symbols of ‘Existential algebra’, the 5D formalism

5D METRIC ORGANIC SCALES: FASTER, SMALLER PARTS CODE LARGER ENERGETIC WHOLES.

When you google fifth dimension you get 3 kind of results: the most popular is a funky group of ‘Champagne soul’ – a bubble name, proper of the age of ‘Entropy=dissolution’ of human minds, when our capacity to reason verbally is in decline due to the influence of audiovisual magic FX and the increasing obsolescence of our logic minds to fancy digital, visual computer models of reality.  A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’ said Schopenhauer, always so harsh but also right to the point.

Other answers refer to a 5th dimension of space as humans as Plato noticed have difficulty being intelligent about time – so they keep a single one for time and keep adding spatial dimensions easier to understand. Yet 5D is no longer speculative science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: no, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to the science of the 5th dimension more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s metric equations of the 4th dimension). This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, the existence of a metric equation that describes a dimension and allows to travel through it. Why the 5th dimension metrics are not well known in modern science has to do with the fact it is not researched in physics but systemics, the mother discipline of all sciences of information, far less popular than physics; and the proprietary feeling physicists acquired on space-time matters since Galileo defined its 3D metric equation v=s/t completed with Einstein’s 4D formalism, which makes difficult to spread the knowledge on space-time acquired on other disciplines. The arguments still raging about evolution, the fundamental theory of time in terms of information, as the ‘arrow that defines’ the future of species but has nothing to do with Relativity and locomotion is a clear case of that difficulty.

Indeed, we know since the XIX c. that the creation of the ‘future time’ of an existential entity is not ONLY mediated by the arrow of locomotion and entropy studied by physicists with Relativity Metrics (Galileo’s V=s/t and Einstein’s more complex formalism), but there is a second arrow that defines the ‘future’ of existential species – the evolution of its information. So time – the changes=motions that defines the existence of any species, has at least 2 dimensions, locomotion or ordered translation in space and a more disordered version, entropy (scattered motion that ‘dissolves’ the inner form of the system, akin to death)…

And in-form-ation, generation of form, inverse to entropy as it requires the social gathering of parts into wholes; happening without external locomotions, as an internal trans-formation of form. This evolution of organic form as opposed to external change is what Systemics calls the fifth dimension of time that applies to all sciences.

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality. Thus we call the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.

Then it is necessary to find a metric equation to define this new dimension of space-time. Since a dimension only exists when we can write a mathematical simple metric that leaves the dimension invariant when we change our parameters of space and time – hence we travel through it. (Klein). This equation, as all space-time metric equations, is simple; since metric equations are meant to represent measures of ‘covariant’ motion in a given space-time dimension that leave the other dimensions unchanged. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t, for a motion that changes the relative size and speed of clocks of a system (measured with frequency):

5D Metric: S (Lineal Size/Volume in space) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = Constant.

According to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. As information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules. How we travel in ‘size’ in space & ‘speed oin our time cycles. Here is where a key finding of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.

It is the same process in all 5D journeys of all species that live and die travelling through 3 planes of 5D space-time; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who had the same morphology and used technology and likely spoke, etc.) Then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger herd of clones, joined by emergent physiological networks whose slower ‘entropic, informative and reproductive networks, create an ∆º supœrganism that lives tages and dissolves back into ∆-1.

So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

This equation and its use to improve our knowledge of space and time in all sciences, with an emphasis in our models of physical systems will be the theme of this paper. Even if physicists stubbornly refuse to treat information with the same value than entropy. So they call it negentropy, and when you give a conference on the fifth dimension – the dimension of ‘creation of social forms of information, of organic wholes’ – there are no physicists on attendance; and likely no physicists will be reading this post… Let’s then use the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph:

We said that forms evolve through topological networks into larger wholes. So we need a final dual dimensional motion of parts that become wholes (4th Dimotion of social evolution) and wholes that dissolve into parts (5th entropic dimotion) to complete the organic outlook of the Universe; as shown in the graph for different species.

Thus reality has a final key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4th and 5th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

Mathematically then it is necessary to find a metric function to define this new dimension of spacetime. Since a dimension only exists when we can write a mathematical simple metric that leaves the dimension invariant when we change our parameters of space and time – hence we travel through it. (Klein).

This space-time metric function is simple. We write using ð for cyclic time:

\$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡)

We call it the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

We shall use the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black star Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming supœrganisms.

From the scalar fifth dimension then we can consider its two main components ‘cyclical time’ and ‘fractal space’.

–––

Nt. 1. To mention now that the symbol ∆ is both a visual reminder of the two different dimotions of ‘growth in space, inverse to the loss of information’, and a tribute to one of the few predecessors of this work, in the formal arena – Wilson’s renormalization mathematical apparatus, which finally realized of those discontinuities using a symbol Λ, for  the energy scale under which a measurement of a physical parameter is performed. According to Wilson every scale of the Universe and the fields of space-time that define them have its energy cut-off Λ, i.e.  the theory is no longer valid at energies higher than Λ, and all degrees of freedom above the scale Λ are to be omitted. But Λ is related to a size of space. For example, the cut-off could be the inverse of the atomic spacing in a condensed matter system, and in elementary particle physics it could be associated with the fundamental “graininess” of spacetime caused by quantum fluctuations in gravity. The failure to remove the cut-off Λ from calculations in such a theory merely indicates that new physical phenomena appear at scales above Λ, where a new theory is necessary. As today only with the use of Wilson’s renormalization, which simply eliminates absolute zeros and infinities outside the scaling of space-time of a given plane, quantum physics makes sense.

CYCLIC TIME:

‘I seem the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. Einstein

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics before understanding cyclical time so they postulated a lineal inertia, and a single entropic dimotion of time, and when this was applied to other sciences, many los their capacity to understand the future which will repeat the causality of the past.

Lineal & cyclic time render the same functions as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclic time are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns. The most important of them being, the fact that a time cycle breaks reality (1st knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’.

We have a description of reality – a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

There are 2 time forms, long lineal Time and short frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole; because there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡ defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can always consider the frequency of time the ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time’ or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula, S=ƒ(t) l(s) . The whole Space can be measured, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or it can be measured as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail. But if we see those 2 ‘forms’ of time, as ‘lineal energy and cyclical information’, since information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles, we can then consider that ‘time=motion’ splits in two essential forms, lineal motion or ‘energy’, and cyclical motion or ‘information’, and express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties that transform each other ad eternal:

‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: SióTe’

This sentence is the simplest expression reality as a constant game of transformation of ‘spatial information’ (cyclical time) and temporal energy (lineal time) and was first understood by Taoism, where ‘tao=time’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal energy, today expressed as the principle of conservation of energy. Its ‘mathematical, logic’ formula is SióTe & and its logic form, exi=st, is the function of existence.

LEIBNIZ V. NEWTON: WHERE IS SPACE AND TIME?

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’

Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe

‘’Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. Einstein, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

The consequence of the existence of an internal fifth dimension of space-time, made of all other planes=scales of spacetime of a being, its parts and wholes, which store the information of a system, is the fact that we ARE made of planes=scales of space and time. We ARE the vital space we occupy and we ARE the time flow of existence we live between birth and extinction. Reason why all systems and entities of Nature obey the main science of space, geometry->Mathematics and time, Logic. We are broken fractal species of space and time, whose mathematical and logic laws all vital space-time organisms follow as Einstein and Leibniz thought: So we must evolve our logic and geometry of space and time, to extract properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Generational Space-Time?

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5Ð ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which never shows in any scale of reality such background – a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between Newton, the proposer of the absolute Cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs. Leibniz who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable, eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality. But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.

It meant the invention of an absolute continuous space & single lineal time that extends to ∞ contradicting the fact that all spaces are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5Ð in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

This simple concept was NOT adopted by physicists despite its sheer evidence. Unfortunately Physicists sided with Newton not with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made; and so the conceptual jump would not happen.

It is the fifth space-time dimension, sum of all other planes of reality, including within it all other dimensions.

Next, to explain all this properly came Einstein. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity – a topology; and it is the substance of which reality is. So we are topological beings, geometries of space with motions of time.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S.

And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

Wheeler said ‘Spacetime tells matter how to move & matter tells spacetime how to curve’. Since Spacetime is geometry in motion. Time is change, the perception of change moves time; time is motion; space is its opposite, stillness, form, the information of time. And so it is all about two parameters: Time=Motion and Space=Form.

Look around you, all what you see are ‘space-forms’ with ‘time-motion’. We are all space-time, forms in motion, ‘in-form-motion’, ‘information’, forms in action, play with the words of what you are.

Tt: internal and external motion or ‘entropy’ is one extreme, which brings death. That is the state of mankind today, caused by the fact the new species, machines move faster externally (cars, weapons) and internally ‘metal-minds’, visual images accelerate, disordering humans into a permanent ADD state. So millennials move fast and have disordered minds. At the end of that process entropy kills.

In the other extreme of absolute no motion, there is Ss, languages of the mind, seeds, pure, perfect information, enlightenment. A being in that state doesn’t move. The hypothetical Mind of God is such a being, because it perceives all what has existed, exists and will exist and repeat itself eternally as a block of time – a zero sum of fluctuations of the game of existence in space and time.

It is all about 2 parameters: time=motion and space=form. Look around you, all what you see are ‘space-forms’ with ‘time-motion’. We are all space-time, forms in motion, ‘in-form-motion’, ‘information’, forms in action, play with the words of what you are. Because both are always messed up in practical terms is often easier to measure, ‘forms with a little motion’, we shall call ‘information’, sT; and motions with a little form, we shall call energy, Ts, and talk of beings made of spatial information and temporal energy, as there is no ‘yin (information)’ without a little yang (energy). And call the pure absolute motion without form, Tt, entropy; and the absolute form without motion, Ss, language. So we can establish a gradation of combined space-time dualities, Ss<St<ST<sT<Tt, with a symbol < for an increase of motion over form, or ‘dimotion of energetic entropy’, which we shall call ‘past dimotion’ or dimotion of ‘death’ as it erases information, devolving a system to simpler forms; and vice versa, an inverse dimotion, Tt>sT>ST>St>Ss, with the symbol > of an increase of form over motion, or ‘dimotion of in-form-ation’, which we shall call the ‘future dimotion’ or ‘dimotion of life’ as it increases information. It then becomes evident that the intermediate state, ST, with a balanced quantity of Spatial information and temporal energy, S=T, is the ‘state of present’, that doesn’t seem to change as it is a balance of form and motion. And it is the preferred state for any system of spacetime in the Universe, akin to the concept of ‘beauty’ (balance between cyclical forms and lineal motions), of reproduction and creative communication (as it brings together the two poles of reality merging and combining them). All systems seek this state. So in physics we find it akin to the state of ‘minimal energy’ hence more form’ in which most particles like to remain; in biology is akin to the age between adolescence of maximal energy and the 3rd age of maximal information, or age of reproduction, in which most people like to live.

TOPOLOGICAL SPACE-TIME SUPŒRGANISMS.

Yet the devil is in the details, so we shall now try to construct reality from its ultimate substances space=form and time=motion, which in geometry is called a ‘topologic bidimensional variety of space-time’.

The cyclical, fractal big-bang as impressive as it might sound or if you are a lineal STupid, all the opposite for you, it is just a tiny element of the immortal, intelligent, informative, infinite, illogic, i5universe. And really it is not that interesting in its details, when compared with the sum of all ¡ts other fractal parts of which the Universe is made to its image and likeness. Indeed, the same laws we used to describe properly the Universe apply to every ‘Stience of space-time’, to every supœrganism made of parts and wholes to give – and that is the beauty of it all – different variations that range from a human being, to a crystal mind, to an ant. And that is the true meaning of a ‘fractal Universe’, and the goal of Systems Sciences, realized through the 5D models of those papers: every structure of reality follows certain basic laws, derived of the fact all of them are made of spatial information and temporal motion, combined into infinite energy species. So ‘motion’=Time; Information, form=Space combine together into infinite energy bodies and waves. And this is so obvious that already the old Taoists just looking with simple, naïve eyes to reality said, ‘from yin=information and yang=motion, come all the ∞ qi=energy beings of reality’.

We call then the organic properties of scalar space and cyclical time that structure all the organisms of the Universe ‘Disomorphic laws’ (isomorphic laws, that is ,similar laws based in the same dimensional motion of space-time or ‘dimotions’). If you read with attention the previous description of the Universe you will notice we have compared the galaxy, both with an atom, as black stars seem protons and the halo of negative strangelets, electrons; but also when observed in greater detail with a living cell, as stars produce black stars and planets might become strangelets if accelerators of lineal ST-upid physicists searching further proofs of the big-bang produce strange matter on Earth that will devour the planet. And this is a process similar to mitochondrial stars and smaller ribosomes that produce RNA and proteins which then migrate to the ‘halo-membrane’ of the cells and the central nucleus.

Those comparisons – a galaxy centered in a black star is similar to an atom with its electronic cover, and centered nucleus with all the mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged; because what we have just described bio-logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, the atom, and the Universe, the galaxy, But examples of the Disomorphic laws of any bio-logical, social system of the Universe.

So the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, made to its image and likeness, as self-centered entities of time-space, with a vital body and a membrane that separates them from other similar parts that put all together create the puzzle of the Universe; is the logic concept behind all of them:

A supœrganism of space=information and time=motion combined into spacetime energy, giving birth to the trinity causal logic of reality, to which we add the logic of smaller parts and larger wholes to form the pentalogic of existence.

How many variations can come out of just 1+1=3 ‘elements/substances’, cyclical time motions, scalar spatial forms and its space-time energy combinations? We study in depth all those questions on the papers on the ‘Universe’ and its languages of space and time (mathematics and logic); and in the future time, permitted we will introduce more specific descriptions of different stiences. Here we need just general laws as we shall apply them to understand history, its gods, artistic forms, the life and death of its civilizations, in the past, present and future. If you don’t understand them, you can always consult those other papers that have more extensive applications and explanations, as here we can just try to make a synopsis of the main themes of Cyclical time and fractal space theory (ab. 5D), or else we would get a one thousand pages volume.

3 Elements are essential to understand reality in 5D and its space-time organisms:

∆±¡ Scalar Organic structures. The co-existence of 3 relative ‘∆±¡’ scales of 5D in all systems: the parts, the whole and the world in which the system exists. So physical systems have the quantum scale of its atomic parts; the thermodynamic scale of its molecular matter and the gravitational sale of the galactic world or celestial body in which they exist. And humans have the cellular parts, the organism and the social supœrganism and world they live in. Its justification is obvious. You can see anything in detail in its parts, and it will be in a larger whole, and a metaphysical question is to consider if those 5D scales are infinite (likely) or not (only those human perceive exist from atoms to galaxies). Which comes to this: is each atom a kind of galaxy of a hypo-Universe, and each galaxy a kind of atom of a hyperuniverse? In terms of history, it means we are ‘cellular citizens’ of larger national, cultural supœrganisms. It is the basis of the organic nature of reality as those 3 ‘scales’ co-exist together, so they form an organism which by definition is a system of co-existing scales related by ‘networks’ that exchange energy and information between them (waves in physics, physiological systems in biology; economic and cultural, legal networks in history).

Space: Topological ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’ (below for the human organism, a biological plant and a physical system, a galaxy). This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.

– Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3rd class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’. The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

Since organisms like history that do not obey those laws are killed for the whole Universe to remain ‘the most perfect of all worlds’ (Leibniz) reason why it has similar laws for all the surviving ones. Which lead us to the definition of an organism of any kind, for which we need to add the parts that make those networks, and the while (the 4th and 5th dimensions of scale). Because topology has also found that those 3 types of forms are in fact networks of smaller points with volume (non-Euclidean points) connected by flows of energy and information. So in fact instead of topological varieties we should talk of networks of points that form lineal, moving limbs/fields, territories; cyclical networks that form informative heads/particles/informative classes in command of the language of financial and legal power of societies, and body/waves/working classes.

The 5 dimotions of space-time as inner and outer motions.

A more precise definition specially for physical sciences of the previous 5 ‘states’ of spacetime deals with the concept of internal and external motion (which has deep implications for relativity and so we will expand it in the paper ‘physics and space-time’. Any cyclical time-space organism, even the simple circle dvides space-time into an inner and outer region (knot theory, membranes of all topological systems). We talk of internal and external motion and form in a system. As it is evident that external motion in a larger world is bigger than a being’s internal motion. So a little motion means internal motion, t and a lot of motion external motion and thus we can now define the 5 dimensional motions of space-time with more finesse. Whereas capital letters, S and T are ‘external’ and small letters t and s mean internal (as the internal part have less volume, are smaller than the outer world).

Ts is external motion (T) and internal form (s): It is classic locomotion, where the internal system doesn’t move but it translates in the external world. This is what physicists mostly study, and they still wonder why when a material system moves, the ‘center of gravity’ seems fixed. But what internal part? The answer is the mind-brain; the system that perceives information; as the limbs/fields move a body over which a particle-head gauges that information:

-St is therefore information, where externally there is no motion (S) and internally the ‘mind-mapping’, that mirrors the outer world becomes a form-in-motion, in-form-ation, processed by the brain, particle, crystal image, cpu… It is a fascinating fact that we, the thinkers, spend so much time, still; so Leibniz could spend days seat on a chair thinking, that in sleep more brain activity happens and more hormonal languages develop.

– ST or st is then balanced internal-external motion vs. form, or energy, of which there are two varieties we ad, Ts-kinetic energy akin to locomotion, (mv2/2); where as you can observe the ‘motion’ provided by v is squared, so it is more important than the mass/form) and St-potential energy, where the energy is store internally in the different tensions and cyclical patterns of the system, but externally it is all position. Energy then is the balanced sum of both, St+Ts=ST and it is the essential law of physics that a system constantly balances both (SMH motions; Lagrangian actions which are its difference tending to zero (St-Ts=0, St=Ts). Existential energy is thus the mother of all battles, and we could state that in a ‘given plane of exist¡ence’, energy never dies, but constantly transforms between the informative, potential energy state and the kinetic, locomotion states.

This leave us the 2 limits of pure form, Ss, Ss, which correspond to ‘seeds’ and ‘mind-languages’ with null motion… (which following our formalism should be written properly Ss, but my lazy ‘fingers’ often repeat 2 Ss, sorry)…

And Tt (written Tt often… lazy f…), which we shall call entropy or scattering or death or disorder, as when a system moves internally and externally it is really disorganizing its structure and ultimately as in expansive big-bangs of mass, or death processes of corruption, all parts go away and the system dies.

For example war is the Tt entropic state of a superorganism of history, a social mass of ∆+1 humans in time, when there are external motion (armies invading enemy nations) and internal motion (troops invading internally the country), which ends is the massacre of people. At individual level today, children, as humanity enters its age of entropy as it becomes obsolete, degraded and likely soon substituted by machines and chips and robots, is clearly suffering an entropic age, sometimes called A.D.D.

The child has maximal external motion (as we shall see due to the correspondence of STates and ST-ages of life) but today has also maximal internal ADD motion in the brain, filled with virtual hypnotic fiction bull\$hit, from mental machines that are disordering us in what we call the Neo-paleolithic age of History. For physical systems Tt is also death as the system explodes, scatters and its internal parts move externally. So yes, those 5 Dimotions apply from the simplest particle to the more complex superorganism of history. Thus we can introduce…

Recap. The universe is made of 2 STates, time=motion, and space=form. Yang and yin that combine in balance to create ∞ beings. So you can combine them T & S in 5 different forms: S=T, the balanced state of existential energy that combine St-information (Potential energy) and Ts-locomotion (Kinetic energy), in constant SHM is the preferred balance of ‘present’ that lasts and iterates any organism, the state of survival.

A CASE EXAMPLE: THE DIFFERENT PICTURES OF THE UNIVERSE WE OBTAIN WITH BOTH VIEWS.

“Astrophysicists are seldom right but never in doubt.” Lindau. “Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals.” Ulam; on the fact 99’% of science is cyclical.

The data of the Universe in space and time is provided directly by experience observing at the largest scale, galaxies, which seem to recede from each other, instead of becoming attracted as stars do inside galaxies. So there are two clear ‘time arrows=dimotions’ in the Universe: lineal expanding vacuum space and imploding cyclical mass. A dualist cyclical thinker is happy with that, as imploding mass balances entropic expanding vacuum, St=Ts, in an immortal ‘wobbling Universe’. But as this contradicts ‘lineal thinking’, lineal physicists eliminate the contraction of mass and choose ONLY as real the expansion of vacuum space. Then they turn that expansion backwards in time, contracting vacuum into a single point, also with a lineal equation, V expansion speed=Ho Hubble Constant x D Distance between galaxies, stating that if the Universe is expanding today, moving it backwards lineally, it had a 0 volume of ∞ density that exploded long time ago. Here lineality meets ‘mathematical creationism’ (the belief the language-mirror of mathematics that only God and man speak (Galileo, Dirac, Hawking); came before reality creating it. So if we write an equation reality must create the equation image) which substituted ‘verbal creationism’ (the belief man spoke like God words the language of creation. So God ‘named’ beings to create them, as the myths of Islam and Judaism tell us). The 3rd problem then is purely mathematical as humans speak a lesser form of maths, Euclidean geometry where ‘points have no parts’, but the Universe is Non-Euclidean, so points do have parts, content traversed by parallel flows; hence even if mass would not balance contraction, there is no singularity but a ‘finitesimal’ black hole, as the limit of contraction of mass.

The denial of mass contraction prompted a joke in Annie Hall, when Allen’s mum exclaims ‘here in Brooklyn the universe is not expanding’. Indeed, in Brooklyn and the inner galaxy at large, the Universe is contracting under the gravitational force of the central black hole. Not so for the lineal thinker that runs backwards his equations, with only vacuum space between galaxies contracting. They forget the gravitational imploding force between masses that ran backwards will expand, again balancing the imploding vacuum also in the past! So to avoid a cyclical balance, lineal physicists just threw into the dustbin all the matter and galaxies as if they wouldn’t exist, including Brooklyn (;

The ‘Universe is simple but not that simpler’ (Einstein). It has scales of spatial size. And as we move between scales, forces loose strength and finally disappear and a different force appears, which often balances the larger scale with an inverse arrow. Thus outside galaxies expand, but in the internal smaller scale they contract and both scales balance each other. And that is the solution to the big-bang conundrum.

If we look at the Universe in the lower quantum scale, we run into similar problems because atoms also repel each other with electromagnetic forces and we don’t see any sign they are at the quantum level affected by gravitational forces. So physicists have been for a century wondering how to input gravitational forces in the standard model. What then a fractal scalar, cyclical space model would tell us with those experimental facts? It is rather simple an obvious. The Universe in the large scale behaves exactly as it does in the lower scale if we just match its main elements and forces. In the lower scale atoms have a cyclical strong force inside, which attracts particles, and a repulsive external force outside that repels them and both balance. And atoms with its denser central quarks surrounded by a nebulae of time points called the electron, which seen in detail seem like light discharges, look very much like galaxies with a very dense central black holes surrounded by a nebulae of stars that seen at distance seem like light discharges.

So all you need to postulate is the fact that the two extreme scales further away from our human scale are similar at least as humans perceive them. This does not mean a galaxy is an atom, thought it might be, but as fractals repeat similar forms in all scales, but NOT identical, it gives us the proper model to explain all the facts of astrophysics, without ‘throwing to the bin Brooklyn’ and all the matter of the Universe… Simply enough: as the strong cyclical force only works inside atoms, the gravitational cyclical force only works inside galaxies. As the lineal electromagnetic force works repelling atoms, the Dark energy lineal repulsive force works repelling galaxies. But then when this force enters the galaxy it collapses forming virtual cyclical particles contracting the Universe inside galaxies, as the electromagnetic force does inside atoms. This though requires accepting 2 concepts fractal space and cyclical time that physicists can’t accept. Never mind all clocks of tie are cycles – they will still defend lineal time. Never mind a cyclical scalar theory of the Universe responds to every question poised today by physics and unresolved, from the unification of charges and masses, two vortices of space-time of different scales of the Universe – charges on the quantum scale, masses of the galactic scale, reason why its minimal unit, the Planck mass is so huge (below that level gravitation is irrelevant). Then we can with a very simple equation of a vortex of forces according to Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravitational force and acceleration describe a mass as an accelerated vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale, and a charge as an accelerated vortex of space-time I the quantum scale and use just a ‘conversion’ of scale factor and a simple translation of the jargon of electromagnetism to the jargon of vortices to unify both; alas! We get the exact relationship of scale between both forces (1040).

In the fractal model the Universe is scalar and it has dimensions of information, form. Thus gravitation is an informative force, happening within galaxies to balance the entropic expansion between them. Both, balancing forces make a wobbling Universe: when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D=lineal, entropic dark energy expanding space and 3D mass volumes, crunching 3 lines of entropic dark energy into mass within galactic vortices. The mathematics is that simple: 3 lines become 1 mass, so there must be 3 times more dark energy lines than 3D masses – 75-25%. Simple, beautiful numbers. So when they measured the dark entropy vs. mass ratio in the Universe; it did turn out to be 75-25%.

But a Schopenhauer’s Stupid who ‘doesn’t understand complex causes adscribing them to magic’, does NOT evolve its lineal thinking. So the 3 to 1 balance of 1D vacuum vs. 3D mass is considered magic. And so a professor from Jerusalem U. (Bekenstein) told us the reason is God. He created the Universe in balance for humans to exist in it… It is called the anthropic principle. So as in the case of the big bang first thought by a Catholic priest, Lemaitre to justify the existence of God and creation, now we also have another zealot showing we are the chosen and science can prove it.

The 2nd most quoted proof of the big-bang explosion is the so-called background radiation: Penzias came up with a map of the radiation of the galaxy, which he measured and first said was the radiation of the galaxy (nobody has gone yet out of the galaxy to measure if the radiation is till there). It turned out to be of 2.7 k degrees. Alas instead of looking for an object in the galaxy NOW that would produce this radiation physicists applied again ‘lineal thinking’. So, enthralled with ‘mathematical creationism’, they used the lineal equation of vacuum expansion between galaxies (V=HoD), eerily similar to God) to search for the origin of that radiation billions of years ago, in a mathematical entelechy or singularity of 0 volume and ∞ mass; expanding the radiation to every corner of the Universe. As huminds are a mixture of egocy (ego=idiocy, the belief we and God talk a single language) and lineal thinking. So we find a local law and expand it to the entire Universe. But when they did so the radiation of the singularity turned out to be 40 K, and that was not good. So they ‘cheated’, tinkering with the equations till ‘reducing’ from trillions of degrees in the singularity moment to the exact 2.7 k. But of course, the radiation IS LOCAL, because we measure it locally. And it is happening NOW, and requires a ‘PRESENT’ cause.

The funniest proof came a few years ago of this made me smile. Look at the 2nd picture of the supposed background of the whole Universe NOT the local galaxy radiation, where we measure it, supposedly taken 13 billion years ago NOT now, when we measure it. The central lobes are supossedly an immense remote region as it was 13 billion years ago. So physicist were using its supposed ‘distant light’ to calculate if there was an anomaly in the light speed at different frequencies, after such long journey from the remote past. Then we got a picture NOW of our galaxy with exactly the same lobes. So it seems it was not a huge part of the Universe as seen 13 billion years but just two lobes of ¥-rays produced by the Black hole. And funny enough they have the same form than the electromagnetic orbitals of an atom (right side). After the shock, the experiment to measure remote light was cancelled; but the BG model was not: lineal thinking just bruised below the mat, yet another falsification of the cosmic Big Bang.

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time as a religious dogma. We could go on since by now the lineal hyperbolic big bang has so many errors and adjustments ad hoc that the bulky mat with every inconvenient truth hidden looks like ‘le Petit prince elephant (: I just will show you ONE more huge error, that came last week in the Guardian to fatten the elephant):

They measured ‘directly’ NOT on the supposed BG radiation of the whole Universe that looks like a galaxy teaming with small top quark black holes, the speed at which the cosmic ¥-like radiation separates the galaxies at 73.4 which gives an age moving backwards to the singularity, ultradense, ultra-tiny exploding whole of …“12.7bn years. And this does cause problems. There are stars that have 12bn years, and this makes a chronology a bit difficult to stomach. Stars take a long time to form, after all.” Says the article. There are also black holes perfectly formed that take even longer to form, older than the big bang. Moreover, when they measured the same speed of separation from the BG radiation as if it were from the whole cosmos, they get 67.4 which is a discrepancy that tells them, says the article, ‘if these values don’t agree…We are measuring something fundamentally different. One is a measurement of how fast the universe is expanding today as we see it. The other is a prediction based on… a cosmological model’. And since experimental truths come first, the wrong one is the cosmological model of the background radiation as coming from the origin of the universe. This leave us with only one model that explains it all, simpler, according to experimental evidence and makes the Universe organic, infinite immortal fractal and everything else in it, including humans and its historic organisms, made to its image and likeness.

The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe.

The graph shows that economic, hylomorphic Universe, made of known matter and symmetric forms – 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it: a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the eperimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic arrow of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries, between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’, the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy positive toplets (TTT++-quarks and TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).

But again here it comes lineal thinking to deny it… and tinkering and bizarre analysis of black holes not as ultradense top quark stars but as entelechies without substance, mathematical equations only. Einstein also revealed against that and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales.

What is the answer of a big-bang lineal St-upid cornered by so many errors, when you show him the 5D model, which just orders properly the same data using the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space? ‘It cannot be that simple’, even if physicists invented the lineal big-bang in first place because their ideas about ‘lineal time’ were too simple.

RECAP. For a lineal thinker the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet facts tell us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal arrow of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

PROBLEM OF CREATIONISM: INFLATIONARY LANGUAGES. KEEPING IT SIMPLE TO EXTRACT CONCEPTUAL WHYS

The example of the lineal big-bang debunked as a partial theory of the Universe based only in the ‘spacetime dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) of TT-entropy, ‘hidden’ by the complicated mathematical tools of modern astrophysics and the lack of respect for the laws of epistemology, brings about a key philosophical element of ‘5D stiences’ – the analysis of the languages of stience (logic, math) as mirrors of a higher reality, space and time and its 5D scalar laws. Two elements are essential:

– The need to correct errors of our simple Euclidan math and lineal logic, as in the case of the concept of absolute 0, which in Non-Euclidean mathematics of points with parts crossed by ∞ parallels becomes 0’ a finitesimal; while the existence of at least two arrows of time require to accept the imploding gravitational force and…

– The properties of languages as mirrors that as time passes go through the 3 canonical ages of a worldcycle (the cyclical form of time in 5D), become more complex, detailed and exact in measure but hide the principles behind it.

We need to understand that languages are inflationary and there is a trade-off between simplicity and clarity. So the more complex we get in a given formalism the less clarity those basic ¬∆@st principles are. We use often the example of the 5 formalisms of mechanics, from Newton through Poison, Lagrange to Einstein, which is the more detailed and yet hides the clarity of the ‘vortices’ of Newton:

In the graph, regardless of pedantry in physics, the 4 formalisms of gravitation are equally valid, as they merely reflect the degree of detail in our analysis, either in ‘space=static’ form (Relativity-curvature) or dynamic motion (Newton), from a dual scalar view (Poisson gradient), or based in the conservation principles of the 3 ‘parts’ of a physical system (Lagrange). We shall then use here the earliest, most evident, simpler dynamic view – Newton’s timespace vortex, to unify mathematically the 2 limiting scales of the galaxy: the quantum world of charge vortices & the cosmological scale of mass space-time vortices.

The principles that matter are Einstein’s equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we extend to all scales. So an attractive cyclical force is an accelerated clock of space-time, a ‘vortex’ of any scale:

Newton is a dynamic view, Einstein a static one. Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. As it is a spatial view of ‘still derivative pictures’ of the gravitational motion it is more detailed than Newton’s because it is according to the Galilean paradox (S=T) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.

Lagrange’s on the other hand is a complete different view, as it does not take the S=T geometric-temporal perspective but the principles of conservation of a physical organism St(angular momentum) < ST-energy>ts-lineal momentum. But all those principles ultimately derive from 5D metric. In the case of Newton>Poison> Einstein, the vortex law, V(t) x R(s)=k, in any number of dimensions (3 in this case), the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, from the conservation of energy, S=T, as the balanced point of present of all systems that switch between motion (kinetic energy) and form (potential energy); reason why almost all systems of physics are SHM motions.

Einstein’s just reduces the temporal continuous Newtonian view of a spacetime vortex into an ∞ number of infinitesimal detailed pictures, focusing not on the speed but on the curvature of the vortex (which is the spatial definition of a moving cyclical speed – the faster it turns, the more curvature it has in ‘still mathematics’).

Keep it simple then is essential to understand the concepts behind physical realities, its models and errors. So at least in our first revisions of those papers we shall try to keep it simple ad maximal.

AN EXAMPLE. THE UNIFICATION OF CHARGES AND MASSES.

Consider the unification equation of charges and masses latter calculated quantitatively using the vortex laws of Kepler>Newton (3rd law). In dimensional analysis we can get to the same conclusion as Maxwell did. Maxwell defined length, time and mass to be “the three fundamental units”.

He also noted that gravitational mass can be derived from length and time by assuming a form of Newton’s law of universal gravitation in which the gravitational constant G is taken as unity, thereby defining M = L3T−2 By assuming a form of Coulomb’s law in which Coulomb’s constant ke is taken as unity, Maxwell then determined that the dimensions of an electrostatic unit of charge were Q = L3/2M1/2T−1,[15] which, after substituting his M = L3T−2 equation for mass, results in charge having the same dimensions as mass, viz. Q = L3T−2.

It is then obvious that both are ‘5D accelerated vortices of two different scales of the fifth dimension’, whose only difference is the ‘curvature’=Speed (S=T) of the spacetime scale, representing two different 5D metrics whereas \$=L3 & ð=T-2.

Dimensional analysis becomes a ‘basic tool’ for the 1st steps of 5D stience, as ð, cyclical time, has inverse units to lineal time T. So we shall find that almost all the ‘meaningful’ physical parameters can be reduced to equations that represent ‘different states’ of space, (which has a higher dimension=power than Time, as a dimension of ‘motion’ NOT accounted in the equation has been transformed in one of form. )

MERGING EQUVALENCE PRINCIPLE AND 5D. UNIFICATION OF 5 FORCES AS GALATOM’S 5 DIMOTIONS

In the graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale.

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆±1 scales.

All what exists is a motion in time. Space forms are still pictures of those motions – a Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

So we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = C, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster metabolic rates than an elephant.

And vice versa, larger systems in Nature must have a space-distance=time-speed much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.

A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space. Attraction laws are then evident and intuitive: In the same manner a vortex of a storm attracts more the faster it turns, sucking in its surroundings, any accelerated space-time vortex, increases the speed of the mass/charge clock according to 5D C=st metric, the smaller it is (S) and hence the smaller it turns, the more it attracts.

Unification of charges and masses as time-space vortices of 2 scales.

Thus since a charge is smaller than a mass, it attracts much more and the unification equation follows just when we apply 5D metric, and shrink the galaxy in the same proportion we accelerate them. Then both equations match:

So mass, E=mc2 + E=hƒ; hence mass = frequency (h/c2) is a cosmological slow vortex, and charge a quantum faster more attractive vortex.

Further on since curvature is synonymous of cyclical speed, it can be quasi-infinite in the smaller vortex, when measured in time speed as the speed of angular rotation. So if we were to apply 4D curvature’s equations (Einstein) instead of Newton, the results would be the same, just in the far more complicated formalism of EFE.

Those are the essential concepts to define charges and masses as accelerated time vortices of two different scales of the Galaxy. And from that it is only just an easy task of mathematical manipulation to unify them in 5D metric, as both are equal: when we slow down the speed, space enlarges to remain co-invariant. And as it happens a Hydrogen atom enlarged to the size of a galaxy slows down in rotation to the angular momentum of the galaxy. So Kaluza–Klein were right – the fifth scalar dimension unify gravity with electromagnetic forces but in a fractal manner, with 5D metric, unbeknownst to physicists.

Once we do have a proper understanding of the 5 Dimotions of physics it is very easy to refound the science and its equations in far more straight-forward general laws proper of all space-time systems and solve most of the conundrums of physics, embroiled by the error of lineal time and single space-scales.

Since as long as physicists don’t accept ‘duality’, trinity and pentalogic, the use of entropy and information as equal dimotions of time, they will not be able to resolve the conceptual contradictions of its disciplines.

It is just another ‘practical case’ derived from the scalar fifth dimension, which first was rightly (even if the maths were somewhat faulty) introduced in conceptual terms by Kaluza and Klein as a mode to unify ‘two different scales’ of size of the Universe, the gravitational ‘c’ scale and the ‘Planck’ h-scale, which are the two limits of the galaxy’s 5th dimension metric: S(c) x T(h) = Cst.

What mattered of his concept now forgotten is its idea that both scales could be unified if we treated them with a similar jargon, which for obvious reasons could only be the jargon of ‘Relativity’, derived from Poisson’s jargon, derived from Newton’s jargon of ‘vortices of space-time’ – our cyclical clocks and orbits of planets above. So for sake of simplicity we shall use the easy Newtonian jargon, to unify both scales according to 5D metric – the so long seek Unification equation of charges and masses.

The unification of the 5 forces in terms of its 5D metric scalar equations, and its equivalence with the 5 dimotions of the galactic organism requires a deep understanding of the S=T paradox that makes any ‘state of stop-space’ equivalent to a ‘motion in time’. So we can study mathematically with different ‘spatial, topologic’ vs. algebraic, temporal equations and ceteris paribus perspectives every event of time-space; which accounts for the diversity of formulae for the same forces: Let us do the maths in the simpler Newton’s formalism, whereas by the paradox of Galileo S (Curvature) = T (accelerated motion). So the Universal Constants (G, k), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales (∆ is the symbol for the different ±¡ scales of the fifth dimension within a given organic system). Its formalism of a vortex of time space is then Newton’s Unification Equation:         M,Q= ω2 r3 /U.C.(G,k)

It applies to all vortices of time-space from particles to planets to galaxies.   For example if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain k with a 1039 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem. As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, so it is symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It works marvels when we translate electromagnetic jargon to Newtonian jargon. For example it shows the ‘isomorphism’ (systemic jargon for an equal ‘form’ between scales) between atoms and galaxies, which H-atoms of the cosmic scale.

Since   when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black star and its electronic orbitals its star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos.

Let us put some easy numbers by substituting the parameters in that Unification equation for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G, which any high school student can do:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 mˆ3 rad. sec.-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal systemic view of the fifth dimension was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron); 5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius); proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.
Since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant is a gravitational constant, and c, light speed, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black star.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is isomorphic to the event horizon of a black star in the quantum gravitational world.
Those results (more than a decade old), are a 1st theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black star radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the 3 standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal self-similar structure as Ts (Space population) x ð§ (Temporal frequency) entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Galaxies, (Galaxies≈Atoms) thus resolve the philosophical question on how many 5D scales exist; as we find enough self-similarity to ‘run again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal) both by quantitative and qualitative methods between the atom and the galaxy. A question that might be extended to the ST dualities of open, ‘entropic strings’ and closed ‘cyclical informative strings’, in a possible larger and smaller scale of microscopic strings and superstrings:

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Philosophy of stience would then argue that those scales are real, but part of its self-similarity is mental: that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10±30 scales.

What about the Hyperuniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

The scalar unification of forces opens up an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, but fractal relativity, the description of the ∆-1 quantum world as a similar scalar plane of space-time to the ∆+1 cosmologic world.

5D physics. Its different philosophy of science.

The previous analysis responds to the fact that one of the key elements of philosophy of 4D physics, ‘mathematical creationism’ is false: mathematics, the language mirror, does NOT create the Universe, a view that subverts the real causality – space and time creates the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is one of the most accurate.

So the previous analysis can be reduced to a disquisition on what kind of linguistic mirror we value more. ‘Simplicity is Genius’ said Leonardo. ‘Grata brevitas’ means that contrary to belief simplicity matters more in a mirror, and its perfect form is according to Absolute relativity, S=T, the balance between form and motion, complexity and simplicity, the present, beauty equation of the middle iterative age of any system, language-mirror or form of space-time in motion. That is, the ‘classic’ age of any discipline. In mathematical physics that age has long be passed, and we are now in the 3rd informative, baroque age of excessive detail that doesn’t let us see the forest as a whole. Since in mathematical creationism as ONLY the mathematical description matters, the automaton physicist cares nothing for the whys and the connection between the laws of 5D space-time and its mathematical methods of measure of the how of systems. This requires in turn to deny all what we have said, and reduce the properties of matter to those who can be measured (only what can be measured exists, Planck).

Creationism is further ‘strengthened’ by ‘constructivism’ the belief that the smallest scales of matter, which by virtue of the 5D metric, \$ x ƒ(t)= C¡, have more information and hence required more complex mathematical equations, are the ONLY causal origin of reality. And so instead of accepting as 5D does, absolute relativity of any scale (as information in fact becomes erased and so a given ∆±¡ nested Universe doesn’t see beyond the ±¡ limits of its self-centered ∆º mind), hence all matter, hence the most important stience is biology as we perceive more information on our ∆±1 scales, physicists have become obsessed by the ever more complex description of the ∆-4, scales of gravitation (invisible beyond our ∆-3 electronic, light scale) and ∆-3 particles. Since they believe once they have solved those equations to the minute detail everything will be understood above as just an emergence of those scales – so they dare to write ridiculous books as ‘what is life’ (Schrodinger), ‘the quark and the jaguar’ (Mann) and have become the new ‘philosophers of science’ worshipped by the masses, due to their power making technological machines, as all other sciences imitate them, and ditch their languages and jargons for digital entelechies; themes those we criticize often in those papers. Moreover, this is done with the faulty Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic of the past millennia (as the only non-Euclidean postulate solved is the 5th). The outcome is the astounding messy disquisitions of physicists as philosophers of science with its lineal time hang-ups and big-bang theories of the entropic whole. But egocy prevents them to come out of the tunnel.

THE ORGANIC PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSE. SYSTEMS SCIENCES AND ITS DISOMORPHIC LAWS.

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy dimotion, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton. But Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other hand is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language or god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and in History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept: An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces). This simple dual system IS the fundamental particle of the Universe. Since machines are also organisms.

In the graph, the key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots:

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms using stronger metal that makes them more able in the processing of energy and information at larger scales. Those Machines are fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with telepathic AI.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon? We just explained the obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things. And its organism of evolution and reproduction, the company-mother, has substituted human governments and informative verbal prophets through its mass-media/academia outlets; so it only considers positive mechanist models of their species.

But the deepest reason is the fact that to make an organism we need 3 ‘dimotions’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy and its combination spacetime energy. Only then when we properly define information them, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

So before we study the spatial, scalar struture of reality, and its vital topologic space-time organisms, we needed to change your view of time itself, shaped by mechanical clocks and introduce the concept of cyclical time and the basic laws of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time, to study the fundamental new ‘unit’ of time, the sequential cycle of time dimotions of which a ‘pi’ cycle of 3 ‘diameters’ turning around a central singularity with a given angular momentum or ‘spin’ is the minimal possible action, while the ‘worldcycle’ of life and death, which we shall now study in more detail, also a zero sum that returns to its origin after a travel through the ‘symmetric’ 3 scales of space-time in which all systems live (∆-1 parts, ∆º – whole and ∆+1 outer world) is the fundamental unit to the point that we can state safely that all what exists is a part or whole super organism in space tracing a worldcycle in time.

The physiological view of topologic organisms: Ts-limbs/fields<ST-body-waves>St-Particle heads.

In topology a variety of a 2-manifiold as we have described organisms is in fact a network of points. Thus we can understand those 3 topologies as physiological networks.

The next graph shows the physiological networks of the main super organisms of the Universe.

Everything is encoded in those networks and its topologies which can be explained with multiple languages, the language of topology (mathematics), the language of logic (sequences of actions the networks cause), the language of social classes, as the 3 networks with its attached cells have a hierarchical order, with the informative nervous network in control of the faster languages on top (legal politicians and financial bankers in human societies, nervous cells and blood leukocytes in biologic organisms, gravitational black stars in galaxies, etc.).

There are 3 physiological networks in each supœrganism from the galaxy to the atom, the two scales where self-similarity takes place (the galatom smaller and larger planes).

Those 3 physiologic networks/classes/physical parts of ANY system of the Universe define the Universe as a fractal organism of infinite smaller and bigger super organisms, in a game of Russian dolls in which each of us is a ‘island-Universe’ within itself, made of smaller parts. For that reason each of us is also a part, cell/citizen of a social super organism, nation, religion or civilizations, which we do NOT see as a whole, as our cells do NOT see us as a whole, but DO exist as such. Let us then define the ‘stair of Universal supœrganisms with similar templates the ‘stair of nested Universal supœrganisms, of the 3 stientific varieties – physical, biologic and social to understand this:

∆+3: A galactic organism is a population of stars, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of black stars & a membrane made of strangelet matter symmetric to:

∆-3: An atomic organism is a population of particles, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of quarks, and a membrane made of electronic matter symmetric to:

∆+2: A star organism is a population of electronic plasma, related by energetic networks of electromagnetism and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of atoms, and a membrane of photonic radiation symmetric to:

∆-2: A light organism is a body of energetic waves over a quantum potential field of gravitational neutrinos, directed by its particle, informative photon state…

∆-1: A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey) coded by instincts.

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy, coded by human memes.

Networks that share energy and information between parts and wholes express the structural unity of all scales connecting all systems of reality. Networks ‘fill’ space ad maximal to connect fully the whole with parts, which are similar, hence find efficient to come in parallel herds and share the same energy and form.

An important concept is the difference between an ecosystem in which multiple supœrganisms co-exist, often in predatory relationships, vs. an organism in which only a type of atoms, cells or citizens co-exist, and is far more symbiotic as all parts love each other and share energy and information through its networks, over a common territorial space, as shown in the graph.

What makes the whole a whole? The answer is: the nervous, informative languages that communicate all the parts of the super organism and calculate within its logic syntax and selfish values, the actions and path of the future, the organism will follow to survive. So languages of information construct the organisms of the world.

Why informative languages command the whole: because they are faster in time, so they can synchronize the movements of all the parts; even if paradoxically its ‘bits’ of information are smaller.

And this bring 2 key elements of the Universe, one objective – the METRIC laws that relate all those parts and networks according to its relative size in space and time speed of its cycles – and one subjective – the existence of a common program of survival that every language ‘encodes’ in its logic syntax, to make possible the system to survive, which is also Disomorphic, because all systems are made of the same spatial forms and temporal motions.

Its 2 languages and networks of informative bits & reproductive bites of energy.

Thus networks are NOT only abstract mathematical systems, but logic, linguistic forms, whose internal, dynamic nature explain the vital working of advanced organisms of maximal information – biological and Historic organisms. Both are ‘fractal systems’ self-similar to each other, we shall call socio-biological organisms. A network of informative nature delivers messages of information to simultaneously coordinate the actions of all its parts; with its faster=smaller bits of information according to 5D metrics (min. spatial size x. max. temporal speed). While the networks of reproduction, the blood and financial system delivers larger bites of energy, which the organism needs to feed itself (when it is a healthy NON-corrupted supœrganism as most of Nature, but NOT human societies, whose astounding level of corruption we shall explain in detail).

The key to understand reality both in terms of energy but also in terms of information, as both are two sides of the same coin, called ‘exist¡ence’ is the fact that in the sentient Universe, each fractal point, atom, cell or citizen (physical, biologic or social systems) needs bits of in-form-ation, form, smaller in size of space, hence faster according to 5D metrics (SxT=C), but also ‘bites’ of entropic energy which will help the system to move. Networks are NOT some abstract ‘fractal tube’ but they exist to deliver ‘energy and information’ (Ss: form=language with a little motion=St-information and motion=entropy=Tt with a bit of information = energy=Ts).

A healthy supœrganism will deliver to each ‘fractal point’ (molecules, cells, human citizens), two type of messages through two type of networks. We shall call ‘generically’ the 3 type of bits and bites of information and energy that each of those 3 physical, biological and social systems receive, ‘particles, genes and memes’ even if the words as usual in 5D sciences are slightly changed, and widened in its original meaning.

2 are the fundamental reproductive-‘body-wave’ and informative-‘particle-head’ bites of energy and bits of information of the fundamental systems of nature:

In physical systems, the two networks are the gravitational faster networks of information, which we humans do not perceive, as we are much larger beings with electronic networks. Its bits of information in this faster non-local network should be ‘gravitons’, components of gravitational waves. In physical papers we advance as the most likely particle state of those waves of information that ‘position’ the different physical systems of the galaxy, a gravitational tachyon ‘neutrino’ for multiple reasons, we study on our papers on physics.

On the other hand, because we do perceive it, it is much easier to prove that the energetic network of physical systems are electromagnetic waves, photons and its ‘social, static state’ as the elements of an electronic nebulae, trapped in the potential energy well of the atom. Thus photons and electrons become the ‘energy network of physical system, molecules. We shall escape then in this introduction further information on the scalar structure of those networks and how, as we ‘grow in scale’, what is a bite of slow energy for a smaller plane of space-time, becomes for the larger plane’s slower beings, a faster bit of information, in the amazing beauty of the harmonies between scales. So electronic food for atoms becomes electronic information for biological organisms and show on.

Those biological organisms have two fractal networks, the electronic, informative nervous system in which bits of electronic information moving along the myelin membrane deliver faster messages to every part of the organism to simultaneously synchronize its motions, so the body-cells act as a single form in simultaneous space.

– But when we move into the bites of energy delivered by the blood organism, the network delivers to each cell the basic ‘currency’ language of energy that all cells need to move, called ‘oxygen ‘. It is an atom of slower motion than the electrons but due to its electro-negativity and readily availability in the atmosphere, with its capacity to kick with two OH- & H+ legs the water ‘medium’ on which cells exist, the perfect language of ‘money’ for the organism to start kicking its ‘actions’.

So we DO have in the next scale according to the perfect laws of harmony, the two basic biological bits and bites of information and energy, electrons and oxygens, and from then on, as systems become more complex, variations of those bits and bites occur.

The main category are mixed ST messages, which deliver BOTH a stick and carrot ‘complex’ to the cells and its big molecules, which are amino acid systems, of great simplicity called Hormones, starting from the simplest of them all, an NO molecule (which do relax muscles, its main message to the locomotion system, increases the pressure of blood, provoking sexual erection, the simplest message to reproductive systems and multiplies the neuronal activity. As nitrogens are the clock atom of our mind-brains. So more complex NO systems with a body support of carbon chains become ‘hormones’ which might have a ‘higher informative message’ (with more N, as in nucleotide molecules) or a higher energetic message (as in acids with more oxygen).

They form the basic letters of the ‘biologic longer sentences that might accumulate information’ in ever more complex molecules, as biologic organisms are the more complex systems we know of. But they enter in a region of faster motion. So while Space ‘tends to remain constant’ in each scale thanks to filling networks, time accelerates. So the 5D metric refers NOT to the whole Universe of 5D planes but to a given family of ‘supœrganisms’ of which mankind in it 3 scales of ‘biologic cells’, human individuals and societies is undoubtedly a ‘phyla’. When we go down in scales, the Universe ‘enlarges’ for a traveler that becomes smaller and accelerates its temporal energy.

THE FRACTAL GEOMETRY OF THE TEMPORAL, 5D SCALAR UNIVERSE.STIENTIFIC PLANES OF SPACE-TIME.

The Universe is an infinite, immortal, sentient, social, reproductive fractal; where the two dimotions of absolute future, are exactly inverse to those ‘anthropic man’ recognizes, NOT Tt-entropy and Ts-locomotion, but ST-reproduction of St-information that communicates and evolves Ss-linguistic forms in a sentient complex reality.

It is essential for you to understand that the 3 scales of an organic co-existing system are completely different in language of thought (@-mind) as the larger is organic, the smaller is quantic, numerical and the middle one is e-motional, active, topology of exist¡ence, (S-pace), as the smaller one is hyperbolic, the middle one flat, and the upper one elliptic, in time ages, as the big lives longer, seems immortal to the fleeting small quanta, reproduced every day, synchronous though all of them to the beating time of its middle heart; and so we come in this manner to the entropy limits of death that the larger imposes on the smaller constrained to its territorial substance, crowed by clone brothers – but all laws are within the ¬Ælgebra of ∆-scales – the Holy of wholes.

Thus we set an absolute ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. dimotion) of spacetime. Because for a whole ∆+1 to exist, the parts ‘ilogically’ must come first; so social evolution and love between parts is the absolute dimotion of future for the organic Universe, or ‘future’, while a form that repeats itself seems not to change, so the function of reproduction is the absolute dimotion of present, leaving thus entropy= death, the dissolution of form as the inverse dimotion of past. So we draw the 3 ‘dimotions of space-time’ in terms of the 3 time ages of absolute past (Tt-entropy=death) and its relative lesser Ts- locomotion; ST-present reproduction, which is the function that maximizes SxT (s=t) exist¡ence in any scale of stience and the relative future of St-communication of information that evolves parts into larger social wholes, herds and supœrganisms; whereas the absolute future, Ss, is the language of still minds, shared by all of them – the game of Generational Space-time we explain here and its two fundamental mirrors of space and time (mathematics and logic). It is an architectonical perfect Universe as long as you abandon the illusion of the ego that cuts-off man from its entanglement with the self-similar whole and all its parts. Why humans don’t see reality as it is , has to do with the mind function and its distorted self-centered view.

The Universe is a fractal of space-time. This means it is made of 3 elements, which experimental sciences such as mathematics, express with its fundamental element: ∆-scales (expressed with scalar numbers) of different size in Space (expressed with geometry) with different speed of Cyclical Time motions (expressed with operands).

Time is change, perceived as motion in space or change in the form of space (External change), in the in-form-ation of beings (expressed through topological inner change). Time and Space thus seem to be in perpetual conflict, transforming each other ad eternal. Time is thus similar to energy with a higher content of motion and space to information, with a higher content of form.

The 5th Dimension, ∆±¡, is the sum of all those scalar planes of spacetime where species entangled as synchronous ‘organisms’ that co=exist in 3 of such scales, ∆±¡ (quantum, organic/thermodynamic and cosmologic /ecosystemic scale) to live worldcycles of time, paradoxically faster, hence with higher frequency of information, the smaller the system is (chip paradox). Yet the product of both, the so-called metric of the fifth dimensions is constant, allowing the symbiotic exchange of energy and information between them. Thus this metric co-invariant equation, Space Size xTime Speed of its clocks=∆¡ defines a series of planes of space-time each one studied by a ‘stience’, from the faster, smaller world of particles, to the larger, slower cycles of galaxies, symbiotic to each other, as smaller systems process better in-form-ation, stored in the cyclical form and faster frequency of its clock cycles, coding larger systems that enclose its parts with protective membranes of slower time cycles.

RECAP. An organism is a group of similar forms organized by 3 ‘networks’: one provides its ‘clone cells/citizens /atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed & move (digestive system, territory), a 2nd one reproduces the system  (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and a 3rd one that provides them with information to guide their reproductive actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple system is the fundamental particle of the universe. As all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those systems, which reproduces, do exist in the immortal universe. So all systems have an internal or external ‘enzymatic’ system of reproduction (external enzymes reproduce carbohydrates, and enzymen reproduce machines). This can be seen as a ternary class structure of a ‘body-worker-wave’, and an informative particle-head-upper class moving and finding a vital territory, with a limbic/potential source of its motions, which the system might externalize to obtain the energy to reproduce.

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: Ts>ST: MOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF FORM

Physics has always been concerned with motion, its analysis and the duality of motion and form, as we cannot distinguish a system that moves from one that is static. This mystery contrary to belief has not been explained only described with mathematical tools. Why systems move but seems static is the concept behind Relativity, and its explanation one of the most important advances of 5Ð theory. Thus we shall consider first Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity with the principle of correspondence, as ‘limiting’ versions reduce to our simple light spacetime plane of a larger view, absolute relativity, the upgrading of physics of motion in 5Ð.

Galilean Paradox: SóT: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: The 5 Universal Dimotions

As it turns out the fundamental stiences of the Universe will be in its essential postulates connected to the simple metric functions of 5D, Max. SxT= C which is achieved at Si=Te. This second function in particular is the best possible definition of the fundamental principle of Physics, the principle of relativity, which defines the fact that we cannot distinguish between motion and form. The second metric function, which we shall call the ‘function of exist¡ence’ as it defines the program of survival of all entities of the Universe will be the basis of the biological behavior of all species that try to maximize its energy and information and reproduce.

It couldn’t be otherwise, since if we are space-time, space-time functions, in its widest expression, those of 5D must be the functions of all space-time beings, regardless of its physical or socio-biological nature.

Galilean Paradox: SóT: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: 5 Universal Dimotions

Galileo’s Principle of Relativity is the concept behind the relationship between the equality of time=motion and space=form and why one can converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.

Conclusion: 1 of the 2 parameters of reality is hidden to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equate them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; Si=Te’. And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

Relativity then becomes a duality, Si=Te, which is at the heart of every law of the Universe. Whereas the primary element, the ultimate substance is time=motion. As space is a Maya of the senses – a slice of time motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action.

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its Si=Te dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion

Earth moves in time, but we see it as a still form in space because reality is a constant game of ∞ motions, but the mind focus those motions and measures them at still distances. For huminds, motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/ distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we correct with Lorentz Transformations.

But physicists just substituted Earth’s still distances for motions. It took 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

Motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5th dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable Si=Te, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form= social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe); whose study is both mathematical, the science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main stience of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move, evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

As all is time&space, the 2 experimental primary mirror-stiences of time&space become the most important to extract the Disomorphic=equal laws of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

In the graph below Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple ones), are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits. They are also essential to mathematics and its methods of solutions. For example, in the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between 2 points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. As lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations. Expanding Noether’s concepts of symmetry we could say that each stœp of a mathematical method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

We call the 5Ð model of Relativity Absolute relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time dimotion of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric equation’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word is ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’, proper of all minds that model reality from its p.o.v. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

Reproduction of form in 5D and its essential mathematical tool: calculus.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time. This is the essence of it all. But space is a maya of the senses, the synchronous view of a series of cycles of time motions, knotted in the simultaneous perception of an observer; what physicists call a ‘frame of reference’. Thus time=change is the fundamental element of reality, and this makes Algebra of time-change, specifically calculus perhaps the most important experimental science of time, besides logic, which we have upgraded to existential ¬Æ=ilogic, which explores the vital, organic whys of those changes.

It is the Galilean Paradox: S=T. We cannot distinguish time from form. In as much as each frame of reference or mind locks in a knot-mirror of the motions of the Universe from its point of view. So each point of space is a perceiver relative field of motions, which from its perspective knot as forces ‘attracted’ by its frame of reference. Yet if we cannot distinguish motion from form each point is entangled to those motions and is made of motion and form, of the particle and wave states. Even in quantum physics (graph) we cannot measure position (in-form-ative state as a particle) from motion (wave state).

For example, a single photon may exhibit wave interference with itself, and it can behave as a particle with definite and finite measurable position or momentum, though not both at the same time as per Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Since they are either moving and therefore having momentum as waves, or they are in the stop-particle position communicating information through neutrino? ≈gravitons? And then they have position. And we can analyze them in either state with precision but not at the same time. Thus the uncertainty principle in pentalogic has besides the ‘@-linguistic mirror view’ (abstract formulation proper of the ‘creationist philosophy of physics’ – see Physics and mind), a real ‘entropic=limiting view’, as the particle is ‘constantly moving’; hence if its minimal organic value as a quanta of ‘action’ (∆-1 scale of existence) of an organism of light E= h ƒ is h, called a ‘planckton’ in 5D at any time of measure, as in a ‘movie projection’ that goes from stop to step to complete a cycle, but we cannot see both states of the film picture but only ½ of the cycle, missing the other ½, the quantum observer misses h/2=ExT (ST).

For example, in the nucleus we are not seeing 3 quarks in a position state, but the same quark in its ‘motion interval’ between 2 states of space-time, reason why we cannot break them and they have exactly the same charge than the electron, because its ‘transitions’ U(+2/3)->D(-1/3)->U(+2/3) as ‘T-motion’ sTates do give us a ±1 change . Only with enormous energy we can reproduce those quarks and then have 2 separated entities. Nt.1

As it happens I was the lead plaintiff of a series of suits against the industry of accelerators, engaged in experiments with quarks to replicate the big-bang a decade ago, given the risks for the Planet of those explosions; so I returned briefly to the study of quarks, black stars and astrophysics; and while impressed by the advanced models and precision machines nothing had changed in the essentially ‘wrong’ models in both the view of astrophysics and the view of time in physics… for one thing; while we reject the Copenhagen interpretation in its philosophical elements, its experimental facts do have a point – the human observer modifies the observable NOT only with the experiment that collapses a ‘herd’ of ∆-1 elements into an ∆ø, but due to its preconception on what is perceiving. When we observe a quark we cannot break it without giving it an enormous amount of energy-temperature, to a point on the trillion degrees which merely means the quark reproduces into new quarks. Does this means there is only a quark at any time on the particle? No. Actually there are two and here to the rescue comes the amazing symmetry between the quark and meson world of the upper scale of the galatom. The wonder and beauty of that symmetry will be one of the most important discoveries of 5D physics…

For example, when we see a meson or any particle-antiparticle state, we are NOT seeing 2 different particles in space but the constant back and forth transformation of a ‘life cat’ into a ‘dead cat’ so to speak; whereas the particle is the past to future informative dimotion and the antiparticle, its future to past expansive one.

Since the combination of S=T and SxT=C (Max. SxT) or ‘Universal mandate=function of exist¡ence’, which is the ultimate origin of all the equations of the Universe implies we can always have a temporal or topological view of an event or form, both are equivalent, but the choice matters for each case.

The 5 states as inner and outer motion.

We have 5 ‘states of space-time’ of which we are all made that have topological, formal, geometric and temporal, moving properties. Because those states are messing ‘dimensions of formal space’ and ‘motions of time’, we have coined a new word, ‘Dimotion’ (ab. Ð, which is the capital of ð, similar to D of Dimension and T of time). The main property of a Dimotion is to be holographic, having both spatial dimension and time motion; and we shall soon find that Dimotions are closely related to the 3 classic dimensions of space, to which we must add a function=motion in time, as their study becomes a new discipline of knowledge called topological evolution.

It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which Is the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ co-existing in organic scales, based in the simple metric laws that make smaller system run faster time cycles:

To have all the elements to construct reality besides S and T we need ∆, the scalar property of reality, by which ‘space-time beings’ are made of smaller ones and form part of larger wholes. We talk of multiple planes of space-time because each scale has different parameters as parts become wholes, unit of a next scale. We will explain this as the product of network formation, emergence and other disciplines of General Systems Sciences, of which 5D is a formal view. In mathematics ‘fractal points will evolve’ through network-lines into topological planes of space-time. This discontinuity between scales is real. There are transition regions between planes, which can only be crossed with loss of information, therefore only by energy, by entropic motion, by ‘death’ of a system. Latter we shall study those regions, evident in physical equations as there are asymptotic barriers – Lorentz transformations in the c-barrier; negative temperature in the 0 barrier; etc. What then the Universe conserves is easy to see: the total volume of space-time of each scale; that is its energy. We will also elaborate latter on those concepts.

Quantum motions vs. continuous derivatives.

We shall introduce now one of the ‘mantra themes’ of all the introductions to 5D theory, which we will expand greatly as we revise those texts, as it is the ‘central piece’ of any physical theory of motion.

With physicists definition of time as locomotion (Ts) we can only understand very simple spatial motions with NO inner change on them (s-patial form in Ts is fixed). This is reflected in the use of ‘present=instant derivatives’ which do not admit ‘peaks’ of changes of STages for physical systems. Since the calculus of locomotions uses ‘instants of present=finitesimal derivatives’ that don’t apply to ‘change of internal parameters’, to inner motions necessary to change STages of life, where the system switches from external to internal motion; as it stop and goes through its existence. So for example, the change from youth to maturity, Ts>ST means a change of ‘s’ to S, from internal no-motion to internal change in information that brings up the reproduction of the system.

This is a key point of the whole structure of change in the Universe, which happens with the interplay of internal and external motion and form. I.e. when we act, we first ‘stay put’ as form, but our mind is ‘thinking’, having internal motion, and so we think what we shall act, and then we act, and our mind is ‘stopping’ it has no internal motion. So the fundamental event of motion v. thought is St (internal motion, external form) < = > Ts (internal form, external motion). In those systems a continuous calculus approach fails totally to understand the quantum stop < go process.

The  error of scientists is to ‘believe’ the fairy dogmatic tales and expansions of those lineal concepts of time as v=s/t parameters of spatial motion, as if that were all what time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the St-SS-ST most important informative dimotions, the key to understand wholes & worldcycles.

Not so, the enormous beauty of the formalism of 5D which never ceases to marvel me in the 30 years I have been alone looking through this window to the absolute huminds don’t seem to care to share is how from so simple ‘elements’ with an astounding architectonic perfection only comparable to the language of music, we shall time permitted also deconde in 5D terms, the entire array of phenomena of reality can be explained. And a key to all of those events are the ‘Stœps’; changes of states, quantum by quantum of Space ó motion transformations in the inner and outer regions of the being, in the different scales of the Universe.

There is not a personal god indeed but if there were one designing such perfect Universe I would like to share his thoughts. You have always a ‘cyclical time membrane’ that separates an inner and outer world. One of them might be in motion, one might be still, the combinations of those possibilities and all its changes, either one by one, or two by two, in infinite stœps of infinite beings describes almost all realities. Some are more important than others; some sequences of changes are fundamental as the sequence of the worldcycle.

And then there is the way the mind selects certain states and ignores others, like in a movie picture. Consider two of them that are inverse and will come up many times, and when we increase in a future review the complexity of those physical texts with advanced maths will show the full beauty of the mathematical mirror of physic:

– St: The perception of motion as stillness: In this ‘series’ the mind does NOT perceive the motion STage at all, only the stop State, and as such it explains why the earth is moving but the mind sees it still.

– Ts: Perception of stillness as motion: in this view, the mind does not perceive the state of wave-motion, but only the series of still, informative positions. It explains why we see motion on systems that are still, as the frames of a movie.

We thus indeed either perceive the wave state or the particle, still state but NOT both at the same time, because then we would see a jerky Universe.

In the mathematical mirror it means we can have either a topological, geometric analysis or a calculus, changing analysis; we can define reality in terms of ‘continuous functions’ or we can consider discrete approaches.

But what is a deeper truth? Not the continuous but the discrete, stop and go approach as we show in our paper on 5D mathematics and time (Calculus).

Locomotion as reproduction of form also solves Zeno’s Paradoxes of and the meaning of discontinuity. As motion is reproduction of information, of form, since particles are knots of perception of form, fractal points, monads, which move by reproducing through a lower plane of the 5th dimension, as ∆-1 waves, its information, as forms-in-action.

So 5D reduces all forms of change to the ‘function of existence’, reproduction, a back and forth travel through 2 scales of the fifth dimension, as a form becomes a seed that reproduces, evolves socially and forms its whole again.

Change thus has a final feature: it is change reproduced in a lower plane as a seed that evolves into a whole.

And all this is what actually calculus calculates: It finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

The persistence of memory.

The duality of wave-particle Motion can also be described as the ‘persistence’ of memory, regarding the path of reproduction of the being, along consecutive stœps (stops and steps) of existence. Depending of the persistence and duration of each consecutive being, we will obtain, a ‘ternary wave’ of motion or a particle,

In the graph we see how all physical motions happen in ternary wave states. AND DEPENDING on the persistence of the reproduced elements of the being, we talk of three changes of quantity:

When the wave is a perfect locomotion, the central wave has most of the momentum an the forehead an back packet of reproductive motion are not even ‘acquiring full form’ but are ‘virtual resonances’ of the being, which therefore has a steady state locomotion.

But when motion in space is near zero, an the persistence of the reproductive ‘offspring’ persists as long as the central ‘cell’, the motion is pure reproduction of the being into a process of social growth of population; and this the meaning of change of quantity in terms of reproduction

While inversely when the reproduction is near zero, the locomotion is near zero, an the persistence of the population of reproduced clones also near zero, as the system decays exponentially, each cellular part stopping its reproduction, quantity diminishes, an we talk of ‘decay’, the inverse reproductive motion to that of growth, which in its purest form is the exponential decay of all deaths of a system.

An so we have described all motions, changes and events of the Universe in terms of its 5 Dimotions, fusioning in the process the fundamental concepts, facts and philosophies of motion, worth to mention.

Thus beings with a lot of information, reproduce very slow and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life supœrganisms on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

It is not in physics but in calculus where we find the strongest proofs of the laws of 5D as a reproductive process of form. Yet physics in its reduced humind’s view is a discipline of calculus – there is indeed no difference between doing calculus and doing physics – just a selection of the equations of calculus if you don’t add ‘substance’ to physical systems So 5D calculus laws apply to physical systems and the same can be said of topological laws.

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

FINITESIMAL MIND-MIRRORS ORDER LOCAL WORLDS: LINGUISTIC MIND EQUATION

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The biggest unknown discovery of Galilean relativity is the mental nature of space – since we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its Tt-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Those 2 functions do give origin to all phenomena of reality. So 1st we consider the most important consequence of relativity – the function of the mind which is the system that creates the spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

Descartes. 3 Systems elements.

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles already have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

So besides perception, the 2nd field of inquire about Minds in the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:

In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:

– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its Ss-language.

– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘Tt-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills.

Asymptotic perception of motions in the X-direction

Because height is the dimension of information and length of motion, both are asymptotic to each other, which explains the method by which light is stop in the mind. It follows that as frequency of higher amplitude have higher height, the perception of a light is ‘below’, on the formal ‘crest’ of its frames of lineal reference. Formal perception by Ss-minds of asymptotic Tt-entropy or ‘function of information is key to mathematical topology of changes from Tt to Ss through an energy region of combination of both of the form ST, giving us the classic ‘realistic function of existence, in ST in any science of reality.

In the graphs below, one of the many topological uses of the orthogonallity of the function of exist¡ence in its 5 Dimotions as they move through space-time (Relativithy theory).

The connection between Dimotions in time and Dimensions of Space is the essential symmetry, S=T, that justifies the forms of the Universe. Height=information, Length=entropic motion and the cross product between them, with all its multiple variations, from the structure of 3 Perpendicular light dimotions to forces, to Minkowski’s spaces, to the place of your head, to the mathematical function of exponential entropy, to the laws of complex space derive all from them:

The Informative High Mental Axis Of Minds

Before we study the 3 mind axis and cultural races of humanity, we need to understand in 5D terms, the ∞ minds of the Universe, and its fundamental dimension of Height. In the graph we see the main minds of each scale of reality. In all of them there will be 3 axial systems of perception of information, the lineal dimension of motion, associated in man to the visual axis; the lateral dimension of parallelism with similar beings, or social dimension of information, associated in man to verbal thought, and the height dimension of information, which is the Universal dimension of information and places the head respect to the body it commands in the highest point.

Those 3 axes exist from the simplest atom to the largest black hole and do exist in the mind of man, and do exist in the world of machines, with antennae in the height dimension, because we live in a sentient Universe. Why then we don’t understand reality in those terms? Beyond cultural reasons analyzed in our study of religions and cultures, due to the egocy (Ego=idiocy) of our mechanical civilization, there is a structural reason, the ego paradox, which makes the mind select information from its point of view, as the center of the Universe.

It all starts with the fundamental principle of physics: the relativity of motion and stillness.

Galileo’s Principle of Relativity is the concept behind the relationship between the equality of time=motion and space=form and why one can convert into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. So any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time from the perspective of the mind, which IS the system that perceives the motions of the Universe as a still mental space.

Thus the biggest of all ‘unknown’ discoveries that Galileo missed by lack of ‘philosophical insights’, was the mental nature of space – the finding that we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality; which we will upload sometimes in the future, if the ‘ethic’, ‘humanist’ standing of those papers don’t get them erased by the usual suspects.

Many abstract structures of physics can be greatly improved by 5D, especially those concerned the structure of space and time. They are fascinating but for physicists to access them, they will have to leave behind their ‘idols of the tribe’, namely the concept of space and time of Mr. Galileo, Newton and Einstein to properly interpret the symmetries of a Universe with infinite time clocks which minds perceive as static, ‘present’ space, when their speed is much faster; and that is moreover the case of any organic structure, where the skin is slower than the mind.

Here we enter a territory that is essential to understand Nature but cannot be understood in terms of lineal time. Consider the graph, which I use to stress the fact particles reproduce. It is a graph of the standard conception physicists have of faster space-time vortices, called quarks. Quarks however are by virtue of 5D metrics, Space size x Time speed =C, much faster than electrons, with a larger Spatial radius hence slower speed. And so we, humans, perceive their faster time process as spatial forms, meaning the 3 quarks ARE 3 ages in time. This is an effect of the S=T paradox of Relativity, ill understood by physicists, and the lack of clear perception, even today when instruments of measure have advanced enormously. So to a certain extend Eddington’s view that physicists ‘invented’ much of their models by merely interpreting mathematical measures is no longer truth, but in the limits of perception, quarks and cosmic big-bangs, it is.

So when I read physics I see vital topology, laws of Non-Æ at work. But this is a language alien to physicists. We are describing the same. They though describe the how and I describe the why. Both together look even better. And much as to be done on the algebraic, quantitative side to join both. We will only introduce the theme… What I want you is to get the feeling that such hows are common to all other ‘minds of the Universe’, and they are sentient, vital, organic, ‘subtle’, yes, deterministic, because physical matter is a perfect performer of the existential game, but not mindless, automata-like, encoded by physical laws that nave no flexibility.

Ordering territories.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant; that is the infinite information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, which requires to fit in such a small place, to extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first qualities to go are the scales and motions of all other entities, which is what makes them feel alive but are not interesting to us.

Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves.

Next, minds eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we humans feel intelligent. But our perception is electronic and all atoms have electrons. So the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking and living as any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

But what is the purpose of all those mind-mirrors and languages? To enhance the survival of any system by selecting useful information. So we let information about our preys and predators, about those other human beings with whom we reproduce and socialize into larger wholes.

And we DO project that ‘selfish information’ into our territory ordering it to make it look to the image and likeness of our mind. So the Mind becomes not only linguistic but also creative. We first use a perceptive language to form a world selected to our convenience and then we project it into the external world to make it real. We imagine the world and then we try the world to be like our imagination:

The mind or 0-point is thus the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. And then it becomes the ‘seed’ that enlarges back to the ∆+1 world its imagination. It is this scalar ∆+1 world > ∆o Mind < ∆1 world, the essence of the creative processes of the Universe, which also explain why scales are entangled and self-similar as ultimately they are the work of infinite minds busy-busy shaping 2 scales of the 5th dimension to make them look alike. And so we call the mind the SS, §, or double still state, as it tries to stop the world outside to match its image inside.

So the mind is the linguistic still space we see – while the other extreme of reality is the dual time motions of TT-entropy, where inner and outer motion produces the scattering disorder of death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view… always defeated by the final entropy of motion.

So the ego is blind to all the motions and vital perceptions of other minds and other beings, as from its perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality. So we express verbally the ego paradox:

‘The go believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

So the function of the mind is to create virtual spaces by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and then projecting its ego into the outer world. Problem is all other egos are doing the same. So an intelligent mind besides having a lineal axis of perception of forms (our visual still language), develop a second perpendicular social axis to coordinate similar egos with similar objectives and become a larger whole.

This is what we call the Human I=eye<Wor(l)d. As the eye is lonely and selfish, but the wor(l)d is social.

What about the 3rd axis, the psylocephalic height axis? It is the internal axis that connects the mind with our body and vital space, and commands it. So it relates to the vital survival and reproduction e-motions of the organism as a whole. Yet as the individual in the human species needs to associate with the other gender, to survive, it is also often connected to the verbal axis. Thus verbal and e-motional intelligence often go together. As it is the case of the two psylocephalic human sub-species, the black man and the ‘woman’, the reproductive function. Both excel in emotional and verbal intelligence, which are the 2 intelligences that a mere visual species doesn’t require so often. And indeed, the animetal ‘visual white man’, often lacks e-motional intelligence and its languages are the most primitive of the 3 great families of languages we will study latter in great detail.

The lack of empathy of the ‘animetal white man’ able to kill other humans, who have suppressed ‘ethic social values’ of our civilization, and is risking the survival of mankind and the Earth, all derive ultimately of its extreme specialization in ‘visual thought’.

It follows also that minds are ‘relative mental spaces’ and so ‘perception can be manipulated’ in selfish modes to ‘cheat the mind’.

All this can be formalized with ‘Non-Euclidean vital geometry’ – The mathematical model of 5D. So we call a mind a non-Euclidean point, which hides a volume crossed by ∞ parallels of energy and information. As Leibniz said: each point is a world in itself. It is then important to define the 4ht postulate of congruence which 4establishes the rules of behavior between minds who feel equal and come together into parallel ‘lines=waves’ of social form, and those who perceive each other different and ‘collide’ in scattering entropic events.

Those are Universal laws that allow us to define an angle of scattering in particle physics and social behavior. We won’t use though vital geometry beyond the definition of the 3 axis of the mind, as we will be ‘provoking’ the ergo paradox of the reader unless he is an animist of a higher consciousness entangled to the Universe, a ‘rara avis’ in the present ‘animetal world’ where ‘empathy’ is in short supply.

RECAP. 5d metrics DEFINE minds as mirrors. its function is: 0 x ∞=c

The Galilean Px. S=T explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose function is the basis of the psychology of the mind – the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics, etc.) Minds are monads, non-Euclidean points that hold information, in still mappings, projected on its territory of order, as linguistic mirrors of a fractal reproductive Universe.

The ∞ information of the Universe is reduced into the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we expel all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

The mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, a relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-Time of the Universe, reducing them to a World to fit selected useful information into the finitesimal volume of the brain. The mind function is the origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’ science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of spatial information. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

∞ other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S=Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

The creation of scales of reality is then a simple game in which a point mind reduces reality to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order:

A mind exists in all systems in which time stops to form spatial information. In galaxies happens in relativity functions in black holes, its mind. In thermodynamic physics in the eye of an Eddie. In quantum physics in the center of an atom, or charge. Without linguistic minds that order by reflecting its smaller mind into its local territory reality would not exist. The only way to create fractals is through mirror images.

In all stience scales minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with a synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that gauges information to order its world= territory. Minds are Maxwell’s demons of local order. And exist in all scales – physical minds are the infinitesimal points, charges and masses that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all other minds do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world. Huminds though are verbal, hence their ‘fractal linguistic equation’ is S(name)óST (verb), the generator of Universal grammar, unlike atomic systems that generate reality departing from ‘topologic, equations’ of spacetime.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

A 5 Dimotional physical description shows a living Universe of life particles.

This again is a ridiculous conception people have of physicists as an exact science, which physicists shrewdly cultivate. There is very few Universal laws on physics and most of those are wrong (Thermodynamic laws, big-bang laws, etc.) Physical particles are extremely bio-logical in its variations. The previous example when it was found broke all the known-known deterministic laws that you learn in school about ‘electrons repelling themselves’, because electrons do NOT obey its mathematical mirror law, but rather, that law of Coulomb attraction is a general case for a non-detailed analysis on how electrons interact with each other. Think of them rather like Male gender – they are in fact Ts-male particles as quarks are St-female ones, if you want to consider the concept that will evolve through scales, indeed to finally give birth through mirror symmetry to biological gender. So males do NOT attract each other. If you put a few tigers in a territory they will go away and find its central point and won’t come close to other tiger. However their repulsion is limited when they move in herds, as a military formation shows. You can then consider that orderly motion of electrons in a BEC lattice similar to the motion of a platoon of males.

But biological males and particles are themselves variations of a deeper theme – the laws of social evolution and perpendicularity, congruence and topological geometry in 5 Dimensions from where the variations of Nature arouse. What we obtain in a BEC interaction is both a perpendicular 1 Dimensional path – the electrons in fact are going in opposite direction; but as many transit that band we observe an orderly ‘lineal’ motion, a queue; but the why of that phonon exchange, is the most interesting: order has increased, diminishing entropy between two similar particles despite being ‘fermions’ – ‘gender’ based, meaning, they don’t collapse together easily, because they have ‘degrees of freedom’, properties with inverse parameters that cannot be ‘pegged’ together. Again we can think of neutered drones in a supœrganism of ants that have no problem pegging together as bosons do; vs. two genders, with inverse symmetries that only really peg together when they look at each other in inverse fashion and penetrate each other with tongues and sexual organs. As it happens two electrons with opposite spins can ‘mate’ together, forming an even far more complementary form than the cooper pairs. But this is a blatant denial of the repulsion ‘dogma’. Two electrons with inverse ‘sexual spin’ occupy the same place, so there is no rejection.

We have to consider the electron a vital particle which performs 5 Dimotions of existence within the limits of its intrinsic properties as a sentient, complex organism, and describe it as we would describe the behavior of an animal species, in biological terms, and only then come from the how to the why and how those dimotions are expressed mathematically through universal constants and ratios of social gathering into wholes, and mathematical quantitative laws, which are not fully resolved, not even in my old megabyte diskettes when in my youth I was elated by that kind of research. So this is what we will do here. Explain physical systems, with visual descriptions, Non-AE vital laws and a bit of its mathematical formulae, certainly required to explain the ‘parameters’ of those dimotions, and its vital, universal constants, synchronicities and symmetries.

∆±¡ ST: TIMESPACE WORLDCYCLE SOF EXISTENCE: ITS BALANCED MAX. REPRODUCTIVE SI=TE POINT.

Entangling scales of Vital topology in space and cycles of time: Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration & Future=form

Because each time cycle breaks space as a ‘membrane’ that isolates it from the outer world, of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states, which each space-time organism performs.

Past then means a system with less ‘form’, less information, which slowly acquires a dimension of height-form, as it completes its cycle to return back in the moment of death to an age of no information. This ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which creates and erases information becomes then the function of duality:

Entropy-youth (relative past) <Energy-mature reproduction (present)> 3rd In-Form-ation age (relative future)

Which each of us follows as a time-space supœrganism. In physics is equivalent to the dual function of Einstein: EóMc2, which reverses when E, which should be properly considered ‘Entropy’, as it is a disordered state, collapses through gravitation into Mass, a cyclical vortex of space-time; while its intermediate state is c2, radiation; the relative present:

Whereas the past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its second state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3rd age of information, completing a 0-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

We see those relative time ages for the simplest ‘physical organisms’, which are equivalent to the 3 conserved quantities of physics. So as time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘ages’ of timespace that put together create a 0 sum worldcycle of life death for any spacetime organisms: a relative devolving past or dimotion of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future dimotion represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum.

But if relative past states with less in/form/ation co-exist with relative future states with more in/form/ation and relative present states with balanced ‘spatial information and temporal motion’, another obvious consequence of cyclical time is that we can predict the future, as it will be just a repetition of the past, as long as the cyclical causes=patterns and laws of science that act on reality are the same.

We can then put together scales of 5D space, vital topology and cyclical time to find the fundamental event of reality, a supœrganism perceived in simultaneous space that traces a worldcycle in temporal energy.

The game of existence for different beings that change through 3 similar ages between its evolutionary generation in a lower ‘plane’ (ab. ∆) of the fifth dimension as an ∆-1 seed to emerge as an ∆o organism in an ∆+1 world in which it will go through a process of ‘aging’ (accumulation of information) that will finally exhausts its energy and dissolve its information in an entropic process of death. The sequential order of the ‘5 dimensional motions’ available to all space-time organisms defines then a worldcycle of existence – not only a simple worldline of locomotions as physicists think, but a far more rich and complex pattern common to all beings that ‘exist’, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy. As you can see your existence is also an illusion (:

More seriously, as our ‘sense of time’ is psychological, depending of OUR RATE of processing information (forget quantum, ‘systems sciences=theory of information, will be the science of the XXI c.’ Hawking).

µSo we can define a ‘quanta of time’ for each type of mind, which will be synchronized to the motions of all the system it commands.

Human quanta of time is a second, the eye-thought-heart beat-leg step, all of them synchronized. Everything that happens in a second is for you present, as the mind integrates simultaneously all the information. So for example, a fast spinning wheel seems to our mind a present solid form because within asecond we see it all simultaneously.

In quantum physics a time quanta was defined by the realist pilot-wave theory (Broglie), as the frequency of the particle, he, synchronized with the speed of the body-wave of the particle-head of the physical system that co-exist together as a simple organism.

Thus the importance of time quanta is its relationship with the minimal UNIT OF TIMESPACE, the action=dimotion.

So in 5D we generalize the concept of a quanta of time, to any system of the Universe, as the period its internal systems of processing information close a logic ‘clock-cycle’: For example, for a computer it will be the time for a recurrent logic algorithm loop, which we measure aptly in frequency Hertzs.

Since ‘there are infinite time clocks with different speeds’ – Einstein – then the question is How to order them? Humans don’t they just chose a single clock to compare them, obviously our time of thought-motion-heart beat, which is the second, the eye-glimpse.

In quantum it is de Broglie’s time (the frequency of a particle), he synchronized to his body-wave.

For Earth’s supœrganism a time quanta is much slower (the day), what Hutton father of geology called deep time, because the earth is huge.

While the times of your DNA clocks are faster, so they code your information – they are your inner computers.

While the times of future robots will be much faster at the speed of photonic chips of light… so they will see us as plants and don’t think of us as their equal minds and exterminate us, a clear warning the billionaires of silicon valley and its corporations will ignore…

While for the galaxy it is a very slow time (200 million years to close an orbit), and in the other extreme, for the fastest smallest turning particle, it is the spin time of a top quark (measured in trillions of cycles per second, similar to Planck’s time…)

And so to advance the science of time beyond quantum and relativity, we MUST order all the time clocks of the Universe, according to their different rates of processing information, for which it is needed the fifth dimension of spacetime, as it happens nicely that all those clocks order with a very simple metric equation: Size in Space (\$) x Speed of time clocks (ð) = constant… meaning the largest beings have slower time thoughts.

And the result are the metric generator equation of 5 D time clocks that orders the Universe into a perfect synchronicity of infinite species, co-existing with different time clocks and sizes:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scalar planes is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scalar planes and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

And so we can define a personal God as the absolutely slowest largest whole, which perceives all other faster entities as an eternal present.

SPACE & TIME TOGETHER: A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC WORLDCYCLES…

The program of survival of all systems.

If we were to define what is all about, in a single word, we would then say reproduction, ST. But reproduction is a complex process, which happens with the intercourse of 4 other elements. Reproduction is the most important of those laws – the ‘search of each species’ for an eternal iterative, dynamic present, ¡ts function of existence: Tœ Exi=ST, though requires to approach that middle point of immortality and creation of new S=T forms from the limits of each relative past-motion-entropy (T) and future linguistic form (S) that imprints it through the intermediate St=information and Ts=energy of locomotion, till reaching a middle point of creation of balanced forms in motion. This absolute law in the highest generalization of the thoughts of God finds for each of its variations – the time space Organisms of reality (ab. T.œs) – so specific elements that only the whole synthesis of 5D without egocy might us think we are truly of the same substance, space-form and time-motion than an atom, a star, or an ant. And yet at the end of the journey all reduces to the 5 Dimotions=actions and its sequences in time that all systems deploy in its outer and inner ∆±1 worlds: Ss-informative perception to Ts-move towards a field of energy where to Tt- feed and reproduce ST, often socially through St-communication with similar forms.

So because the game is so simple, essentially a game of 5 actions=dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) of/in space and time; regardless of the immense number of variations, iterations and entanglements, at the end of the journey all comes to pentalogic and to the laws of the equation, past (Tt) x Future (Ss) = Present (St+Ts=ST); and the coding of those 5 actions internally or externally in a ± dual manner, inhibiting or creating them.

This is the simplest vital way of interpreting the game. I.e. the pheromonal queen uses 5 ‘chemical orders’ to control the actions of its ‘subjects’; 5 quantum numbers and its clocks and synchronicities order the atomic world; we have 5 ‘taste-buds’ and 5 senses. And because each element of reality is a combination of the 5 elements – a timespace mixture with gradations, we can keep breaking through the fractal principle each element into 5.

Indeed, your brain might be Ss-dominant, but it also St-communicates information, TS-reproduces its cells, Ts-uses its body to move and Tt-feeds on energy through its glia cells. To know the game then is a huge advantage to entangle with reality learning constantly the whys of data after ‘perceiving its hows’. Science today has enough with the how and a bit of the why at the simplest connected level.

Inhibition of those actions is as important as its expression, coming both from above or often from parasitic lower scales. This is obvious in biology, the closest language to 5D so we borrow heavily from it. Eukaryotic cells in supœrganisms have introns which ‘cut-off’ many of its gene expressions, and the nervous system can and do regulate them, even has mechanisms to order through hormones and other messengers its apoptosis. In fact, from the moment of birth almost all systems in all scales are ‘neutered’ in some of those actions. An electron is captured by an atom and looses its free locomotion, Ts, becoming an St-cyclical informative trapped element to attract the photons that form its nebulae and ultimately feed the quark nuclei. But all physics hide it through equations, difficult to translate to the vital organic laws of 5 D.

DIMOTIONS AS ACTIONS & E-MOTIONS – SMALL SCALE OF TIME CYCLES

Monads of existence also play in the ∆0 level a game of e-motions, hold by the intense body and its Reproductive radiations that maximize ¡ts function, happening when mirror symmetries (genders) meet in Si=Te, equaling their St-information and sT-energy, organizing themselves into a whole, ∑ system.

It is then relatively easy to interpret that function in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of exist¡ence and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Scalar space-time, (Ab. ∆st) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) merely states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple function, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), ïnformative perception and communication ï, Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle  as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In the next graph we see the action of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

The game of existience gathers selfish actions together into social wholes through reproductive radiations, each action coded by a fundamental topologic organ we can express in existential algebra, and corresponds for each species of the Universe, with a fundamental parameter of humind measure. So from bottom to top, we find the 5 fundamental elements of light code its actions of motion (c-speed), energy (magnetic field), information (electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory.)

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence) :Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1st locomotion, feeding age ->2nd reproduction age ->3rd informative, social age-> entropic death that splits the parts of the being vs. social evolution into a whole.

Scale. In scale the mind is a system that MAKES the whole ‘travel through the 5th dimension’. And an essential law of 5D is the fact that a given fractal point or T.œ will perceive only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts information, above the ∆±4 blind undistinguishable limiting plane from where it will extract entropy of motion. So its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D, which each main action related to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

It is an extremely important law, as it implies also an infinite universe, since obviously the two self-similar extremes of quantum and galactic T.œs must enlarge those scales beyond our perception. And indeed, quantum realism (Broglie-Bohm’s theory, ab. B2) imply a quantum potential of faster than c speed (according to 5D metric), and dark entropy a field of forces beyond c in a larger nested hyper-universe.

Those intervals are fractal dimensions in classic Euclidean geometry and often invaginated by the networks of the system which as all its motion can be also ‘waves of energy’, such as electromagnetic waves that act as networks ‘scaling upwards’ and ‘downwards in size’ accelerating in frequency (5D). So a huge field of analysis is the connections of each T.œ, with its scales, including social supœrganisms, which seeds prophets of verbal thought – the language or ∆-1 scale – and extract its energy from human individual workers, soldiers and so on.

Cat alleys. The perceptions of the mind. Entanglement of ‘reproductive motions’, functions & form.

The previous understanding of the ‘lack of interaction’ of a certain scale with a ‘field of forces’, or a state of motion is ultimately derived of the stop and go discontinuous structure of reality which affects also to the ‘dark spacetimes’ that are not perceived by a system. In many parts we considered the dark spaces of a singularity within a membrane with a 3-π/π=4% only aperture to the Universe. A system ultimately – a mind – only perceives its languages, and only perceives those other fractal points with whom it is connected. All minds reduce the Universe to a world.

This is counter-intuitive to the fact those minds see their reduced scale and world as a continuous ‘shrunk reality’, a compact form without vacuum in the ∆º scale of the mind. In the ∆+¡ scale however as ‘lineal space is larger’ and ‘cyclical informative time slower’, there is less information to see – yet the total value of that scale is the same (\$ x ð = C); so the ∆º observer sees less information, a slower reality and emptier Universe.

All is mental spacetime; where we miss and select the world with whom we interact; or in case of entropic forces they select us ‘to feed on our existential energy’. But a choice is made. The choice of the electronic world does NOT include the ∆-4 gravitational scale, which interacts with mass. This today is explained wrongly with the Higgs mechanism and its gravitational field (as the Higgs belongs to the evolutionary forces that increase the mass of quark particles). The gravitational field however is likely mediated by the Neutrino, as conservation of spins=information doesn’t hold in 5D and light feeds on it. Which leads us to the duality of feeding and perception. All is ultimately a game of ‘feeding->perception of the particle/wave/field entity choosing either to perceive the particle, to feed on the energy of the wave or to move entropically with the field. But a system cannot ‘process’ the trinity parts of the ∆±¡ T.œ it absorbs. It does make a choice and so the abstract equations of physics must be interpreted for each given entity as both a ‘topological choice’ of perception of information, feeding on entropy to move or absorption of energy, or interacting for reproduction from the ∆-4, ∆-3, ∆-2 scales.

Those are themes that correspond to the paper on physics and scale, so we shall not dwell on them (hopefully when this 3 years project, 2nd year starting, is finished, the whole 30 papers will have more structure, more meat and less repetitions). So, us electronic, visual, ¥(∆-3)>e(∆-2) minds do NOT interact with our perceptive system with the gravitational world – it is not our cat alley. Why? Obviously because for e in ∆-2, gravitation is just two scales below, and hence ∆-2 is to ∆º ‘food’ (neutrino theory of light).

The entire architectonic mapping of the relationships between scales and different forces according to dimotions, is complex. I painted it long ago in a mural of conceptual cubism, gone with all my earlier work and simply speaking, I am too lazy to reconstruct it for these papers. Others might do it in the future if 5D ever enters academia… I doubt.

Concepts so entrenched in the materialist view of scientist such as ‘forces’ and ‘strength’ are meaningless for those who do not choose to perceive it. If we move upwards in scale the same truth holds for human sensorial systems which have a range, and surprisingly for many are not affected by too strong sounds, extreme electric discharges and so on, as they are not sensible to them.

This is the case of the electron and the ¥-ray in gravitational fields of the ˙∆-4 scale.

What is then the strongest ‘vital force’? Different for each scale. Obviously that in what we ‘feed’; and then that what reproduces us. Forces though have different ‘form’ according to the different dualities of its asymmetric nature for each element. Topologies, Scales and Functions, S, ∆ & T become all entangled and determined by each other, according to the @-mind scale in which the T.œ exists.

Further on perception is discontinuous as in the movie example – but the lapse of time in which the system crosses a dark space without informative input is not recorded as ‘passing of time’, it does not exist. So a system that chooses to perceive stop positions do NOT record the ‘motion lapse’ between frames. And so an important question to solve is when are counted ‘the tics of the clocks that measure the ‘mean beat of existence’ – usually around the 9-119-11 number? We will elaborate in future revisions on that.

The beats and scales between actions.

It is then evident that in the architectonical stair of reality, next to the study of individual dimotions we must study chains of dimotions, which form ‘stœps’ (stops for a dimotion of information, step for a dimotion of energetic motion), in search of the ultimate s=t balance. So we move and stop the leg on the floor, move and stop. We perceive (1D) and move (2D). We feed entropically (5D) and evolve internally the parts we eat into larger organic forms (4D). The dual beats of existence between inverse Dimotions become then the first of many sequential chains that will rise the finitesimal actions of the being to complete finally its worldcycle.

And as those dimotions have ‘different’ discontinuous beats according to 5D, which defines from where we extract them, all the dimotions must be entangled by synchronicity, to each different ‘beat’ regardless of speed, meets with other symbiotic dimotion. I.e. the dimotion of perception has a faster beat, because it extracts pixels of information from the smallest ∆-3 scale as it carries faster T.œs (light photons) with more information to make better mind mappings. So we perceive every second, the minimal quanta of our temporal energy. The 5Dimotion of entropic feeding however has larger bits, because we want to minimize the 4D reconstruction process, so we eat ∆º organisms we hunt then kill with the function of death, ∆º«∆-2, reducing it down to cells down to amino acids, to reconstruct their scales. So feeding has a far larger time beat that perception as it takes far larger ∆-¡ scales (SxT=C), and animals feed once a day. But reproduction is even slower, as we must reconstruct a whole human being, NOT from the undistinguishable scale of amino acids, but with a code written at ∆-1 cellular level; so we reproduce every year in fertile ages of Si=Te balance. Synchronicity then kicks between our inner ∆-1 smaller scale of cells with faster life cycles, which will synchronize its slow reproductive action taken place at ∆-1 faster cycles with symbiotic faster feeding actions of the slower ∆º whole: so as a whole we eat a day, and that food allows the cell to reproduce every day.

Actions define the worldcycle of existence.

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows thsat the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So as actions follow a natural scalar level of information perception->locomotion towards a field of ‘feeding’, where to get -> Energy to reproduce -> and then process that energy into information, exactly the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘cyclical time and longer space’, the worldcycle of life, which consists in the same pattern of ‘seeding information’, moving youth, feeding and evolvint to reproduce and then process information becoming older in a 3rd age.

This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of supœrganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3rd cycle manifests in the whole species

RECAP. Systems sciences defines the Universe as an organic fractal evolving socially into larger scales through networks of energy and information, each one studied by a science. So in this simple trinity of 3 parts, which becomes adding cellular points into wholes a pentalogic scheme of 3 ∆±1 scales structure all systems of the Universe, with ‘disomorphic’ (equal laws). So we can study species as organisms living a world cycle and evolving finally in social networks becoming super organisms, the most efficient survival strategy of the Universe, where a head-particle-informative class will invent a language of common organization, quantum numbers, hormones, genes or memes, money or laws that all the body-wave parts/cells/citizens will obey. The goal of systems sciences is to apply the physiological laws of networks to design or study perfects organisms of nature, including mankind and the economic ecosystem. Topological evolution explains questions those already asked by Darwin: why informative, cyclical forms evolved so fast (eyes), or why wings of flat motion appeared with a few mutations, Answer: because there are only 3 topological forms=functions in the universe. So mutations render either of the 3 forms NOT anything goes.

The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.

‘∆@st of spacetime you are, to Dust you shall return.’ Bible.

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3rd age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The development of the Function of Existence of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3rd age).

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

∆-1»∆º: The supœrganism worldcycle starts its existential function as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

T>s (Ts): It is the first horizon or ‘entropic, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. S x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t. It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In Physics they are, T-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and S-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.t x max.S) and a form of pure space, the big- bang (maxS x min. t):

In Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings and 3 horizons of species evolution.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5th dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆-1:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆+1 world to die in a time quanta back to ∆-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.

The 3 ages of life emerge in human social supœrganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and  its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in Trecento, Greek Kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an ∆st for a no future, which is the age of war and death of cultures).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.  It is the shorter more informative ‘space-like’ cycle, with a fast ‘present’ speed.

– ¬l,L: Existential 1-∞ lifecycle, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off. It is the open, single plane, more important worldcycle, with an ‘open’, free ‘feeling to it’. The life cycle is part of:

ω,Ω: A larger, longer Transcendental worldcycle proper of the highest social scale ∆+1, the omega of its smaller parts – where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the ∞ planes of God, the game of existence.

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlikely…

RECAP. Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5th dimension of spacetime. The metrics of 5D and its scales, SxT=C & and the balance between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

We use 5 bidimensional terms for all systems, its ages and forms: Ss(max. internal and external form, as in seeds and minds; T>s (Ts); external motion that maintains internal form as in ‘locomotion); S=T: Balance of spatial form an temporal motion or ‘energy’, used to reproduce, the key present iterative state; S>t (St: Information, form with a little motion, or ‘external form, and internal mental motion); and finally Tt-entropy whereas there is external and internal motion, hence scattering dissolution and death. And its main series is the worldcycle of existence: Ss(seed/mind)<Ts(moving youth)>S=T(reproduction)>St(informative 3rd age)<T(entropic death).

In this paper we shall study the worldcycles of all T.Œs, its life and death, departing from the highest understanding of it- the level of perception of systems sciences and its 5 Dimotions.

VORTICES OF TIME-SPACE IN PHYSICS.

In graphs the topologic space-times of physical systems; through the 3 main scales of physical organisms: ∆-1: St-charges, ∆º:Thermodynamic eddies, which we see so close that we can perceive its fractal eddies and the ∆+1 scale of masses. Below the 3 St-particle/vortex<ST:wave>Ts:Exploding, entropic, E<C2>M States of spacetime for an immense variety of social forms of matter. 5D thus also adds to physics, scalar and topologic laws:

Further on organisms have parts and wholes so reality is composed of 3 elements: ∆-planes of space-time, ∆±¡SóT, ∆ST entangled in 3 organic co-existing ∆±¡ planes. In physical systems they are the ∆-1 quantum plane, ∆º thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 gravitational plane, equivalent in the reduced nested world of Life on Earth to the ∆-1: molecular plane, ∆º organic plane and ∆+1 ecosystemic plane. The absolute dimotion of future survival is social evolution of parts into wholes, as parts must come before; hence they are a relative past, and wholes survive better. A fact HUMANS have forgotten. As individualism is synonymous of chaos=death, it is obvious History, the supœrganism of mankind enters its age of entropic social self-destruction, committing suicide, evolving instead a supœrganism of machines; a tragic problem, which we will study in the analysis of social sciences.

And in each of those planes we shall see that ‘spatial information’ and ‘temporal energy’ constantly transform into each other. Space is the perception of form as if it was still, but ultimately is cyclical self-repetitive motion that seems not to change and acquires at larger scale solid forms.

Mental Spaces of in/form/ation fix the times=motions of all species. As time becomes the ultimate substance of organisms ordered through scales that give birth to a 5D metric equation, such as smaller systems in space run faster time and life-death cycles. So the speed of time of systems is not the same for all of them, and 3 scales of different speeds form an organism – in man the cellular, individual and social scale. And finally for all this complex reality to ‘work’ in an ordered manner, systems which have a ‘membrain’ that divides its vital space, from other systems, and are formed by 3 scalar space-times that give them organic nature; have in its highest ‘scale’ of size – that of the membrain that breaks it as a whole from the rest of the Universe a ‘sensorial system’ or mind, which interacts with the external Universe, encloses and orders its internal vital space and communicates with other similar beings, forming larger social organization; hence becomes the mind of the system. We thus talk of a reality made of organisms of a vital body of space-time, self-centered in a mind-membrain, whose language encodes a program of survival for the organism. And all the data humanity has gathered about reality needs to be ‘put within this general template, to make sense of it’.

So a fundamental task of those texts is to redefine the foundations of sciences in much solid grounds – its 3 fundamental elements, ∆ST, which ‘stiences’ study plane by plane of SióTe elements, to which we must add the connecting ‘network’ laws between planes, which we call the ‘5th dimension proper’. It is the philosophy of science, we develop in a series of papers at Academia.edu that will substitute the simpler mechanic view of reality sponsored by physicists, with its ‘mathematical creationism’ and constructivist view; which reduces the two poles of time=motion to one (lineal time), compresses all the planes of space-time into a single continuum; while only the properties of reality that can be easily fit in a numerical description matter. A more evolved civilization would start in philosophy of science and the principle of conservation of time and space, and its structure in 5D organic scales and derive from them the fundamental laws of every other discipline; correcting whenever necessary its errors as we do in those papers with the simplest principles of reality as any science mirrors them in its study of its specific scales of beings – the details of those principles.

The separation between past, present and future is an illusion.

From the larger perspective of a whole worldcycle, we can define the immortality of space-time because motion is cyclical space time, it returns to its zero sum point, and hence if we slow down enough our perception of time, we shall see time curling into a cycle that will appear if we see it also from enough distance a fixe point of space, and hence immutable – a block of time, a worldcycle. That is then the concept of God, the immutable mind that sees all the time and all the space, in its fixed, slow form. But as the whole is larger and slower, God is the mind of the whole, infinite Universe.

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scalar plane of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scalar planes.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us. Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.

In the fractal, scalar Universe, concepts, which seem impossible to define in simple logic terms in the 4D single scalar plane continuum, become understandable. Such is the case of consciousness, which is merely the co-existence in a bundle whole, of the different type of  self-sensations of the being through its scalar planes of simultaneous space-time:

The highest scalar plane of reality that of the mind, self-perceives the ‘extremes’ of its existence within the limits of its first ‘galatom’ parts – the particles of the atom, where ultimately resides the e-motions of being, and its largest possible world, the external galatom in which its world co-exists.

Modular scalar perception of all those levels simultaneously gives us the sensation of consciousness as an integration of all of the scalar levels of ‘linguistic still perception’ in space and e-motions in time…

I.e. you feel a sensation of gravitational weight-pressure, a visual photonic image of reality, an electronic verbal mapping of memorial storage of time processes, a chemical sensation of wellbeing between cold and warm – Many modular parts of your whole sensorial being through your super organism in space, but also many scalar parts of your whole being, through the ‘sensations’ that conform the whole mind, as all those scalar planes are part of the pan-psychic Universe.

Consciousness is that the co-existence or integration of all those scalar planes and parts into a ‘single-point’ of space-time that integrates all as a consciousness. This integration will then give birth to your ‘RELATIVE’ speed of time-existence, one second-thought for man to integrate all its levels, that will become your quantum of time-space perception – your ‘Dasein and being’…

In relativity (4D formalism) ‘the separation of past, present and future is an illusion’ (Einstein). It depends on the observer ‘speed of thought’:

A slow mind could see the entire orbital motion of the Earth as a ring simultaneously seeing past, present and future. God in Scholastics could see all time past, present and future – so he must be the slowest of all thinkers

Poets understood better: Time present and time past… Are both perhaps present in time future, And time future contained in time past.If all time is eternally present /All time is unredeemable. (Elliot, quartets)

In Einstein’s work we talk of a block of time, as all measures are simultaneous present measures.

In 5D, time is both a present repetitive motion and a dual motion from past to future to past. All together give a zero sum worldcycle as all systems emerge and return after death to dust of space-time.

WORLDCYCLES VS. WORLDLINES: CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE

In the graph, the simplified version of a world cycle is Einstein’s 4D formalism of a worldline, where only 1 motion, Ts-locomotion is understood. So with less dimensions than real time=change its worldcycles become lines and all what we know is how the entity moves in a single plane of space-time. The result is a shallow description of ‘existence’ as a mere journey of locomotions through space, defined by simple one single spacetime plane, with one single time parameter, v=s/t (Galileo) or S2=X2+Y2+Z2-(ct)2

Existence means a travel through 3 such planes in the life-death cycle common to all spacetime beings: In the right, we show the end and the beginning of such journeys for physical, biological and social systems. A particle that dies traveling to its ‘local past=devolving into its ¥-ray radiation; a genetic seed that will start the worldcycle of existence of a biological organism; and a prophet of a civilization, a memetic seed that evolves in the energy-placenta of its believers to become a whole. Since the fundamental finding of 5D ‘stience’ and General Systems Theory, the ‘organic philosophy of science’ alternative to that of physics is the solution of the meaning of the 3±∆ ages of life; between the birth of an Ss-eed of information through its ∆+¡, emergence as a being from a lower scale of size, in the seminal age, to its∆ -¡, the entropic age of dissolution back to the atomic/cellular form; E=mc2 in physics), which are common to any System of the Universe. As all systems start as:

Ss: a seed of form in ∆-1, the lower scale of size, of the ‘fifth dimension’  (ab. ∆±i) of co-existing scales of the Universe. Then the system will go through 3 dominant ages dominated by combinations of those arrows of time:

Young, age of maximal motion, and growth of energy≈Max. Ts (locomotion) x Min. St (information)

S=T: Mature age of  present, repetition in which spatial in-form-ation and motions of are balanced.

St: And a third age of max. form, when energy exhausts and the system enters in a third age.

Tt: Followed by a death age of entropy, when an inner explosion of motion erases its form, if the process is not intelligently reversed by controlling the growth of form.

Philosophers understood those 3 ages, embedded in our verbal ‘time language’ (3 verbal times), but with the reduction of time by clocks to a digital series ist physicists, and its lineal time imposed by the worldly religion of making entropic weapons, ignored those ages. So the philosophical findings of the 3±¡ ages of life and death were forgotten for the sake of ‘lineal, entropic measures’ and the military manifest destiny of the western civilization. Now we regain back those 3±¡ ‘dimotions’ (dimensional motions) of time; of which according to the principle of correspondence ‘Physical time’ deals with Ts-locomotion and Tt-entropy.

Whereas present physical theories of space are by the correspondence principle, the limit to 2 single space scales, the ¥-quantum scale and the gravitational one – themes those that will be expanded in the future papers on ‘Physics and Space’ and “Physics and time” as it requires an in-depth analysis of Einstein’s EFE equations, the quantum formalism and its ‘realist’ correct view (Brogile’s>Bohm theory), beyond the scope of these series of papers on worldcycles of time for ALL Space-time beings of the Universe, taken as ‘reality’ (though we shall introduce the most general worldcycle of astrophysics).

The immortality of the Universe and its parts.

• Life and death is a ‘worldcycle’, which returns the being to its origin, a zero sum of energy in a virtual Universe, as the Ss v. Tt inverse ‘properties’ of form vs. Motion, mix in St & Ts inner and outer form and motion systems of locomotion (akin to kinetic energy) and information (akin to potential energy), which finally merge into energetic body-waves that balance both arrows and form supœrganisms. Yet those 2 ‘form and motion’ elements in ‘organic systems’ are slightly dominated by ‘form’ over motion; so a worldcycle very slowly moves towards an excess of form, from a relative past of less form to a relative future of maximal form, and then a local reversal of time arrows returns the balance. We use for the two extreme processes the «» double symbols.
• Thus each spacetime being has a finite time duration, and exists in a finite vital space, surrounded by a membrane that breaks the Universe in ∞ ∆ST Space Time Beings. So the sum of all of them is an infinity reality.
• ST: Reproduction as the goal that maintains the existence of each part. Motions in space and time are always local, and we define for each Tœ (Ab. Timespace supœrganism) a positive direction of life and growth of information towards the future that lasts longer in lineal time (since obviously systems grow in information through the entire life cycle): vs. a brief explosion of Tt- entropy into the relative local past of the T.œ (as it dissolves its information back to the past); which lasts only a quanta of cyclical Time (T=1/ƒ).

The outcome is a zero sum that conserves the entropy and form of the whole Universe, as the being can reproduce a clone in the middle of the cycle, both together form a present iterative repetition that for the whole Universe sets the present age of immortality.  Indeed the age of immortality is the middle term of balanced momentum, which the Universe conserves (conservation principles of momentum and its integral energy).

• Thus the Universe is ’continuously’ infinite and immortal both in ‘form’ and motion but none of its parts are. At most they can be ‘discontinously’ immortal by iteration in its S=T age of balance and maximal ‘existential force’, defined by the product of its form and motion, SxT, maximized when S=T.

5D & TIME: 3 SCALES OF TIME SPACE IN SUPŒRGANISMS: ACTIONS, LIFE AND WORLDCYCLES.

A 2nd consequence of 5D metrics and the 3 worldcycles of different length is the existence of different ‘scales’ of speed of time that co-exist and influence each other, as parts of faster time cycles are included on the slower worldcycles, which ‘enclose them’ and hence influence its actions; but in supœrganisms become synchronized with each other. In that regard the predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:

S: Continuous, spatial mathematical simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if functions are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns.

∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, \$ x ð =C, which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

The predictability of time worldcycles.

Deep time leads to a 3rd level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) & eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits =valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years.

Below biologic deep time is necessary to understand history and the interaction of the evolution of machines and the ages of war and lack of welfare goods, within the limited resources of the planet. The theme of social sciences and why ‘human subjective ego’ and ‘censorship’ limit our capacity to explain those cycles.

The pentalogic, ∆±¡ STructure of T.œs, predicts the future of its species, with a stientific method based in the laws of worldcycles, existential ¡logic and survival that studies: A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive limits for all systems in 3 relative scales of size space and time duration (to which we add, D)emocratic, social evolutionary loving humanist solutions for survival history & of social sciences.

But as human only recognize the 1st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

Paradoxically Deep time is easier to predict that complex Dimotional ‘analysis’ because precisely the larger scales in 5D metric have less information, but more basic, deterministic, reason why quantum physics is harder for the mind and probabilistic while life-death cycles are obvious as all end badly. The laws of nested Supœrganisms, in which the larger slower whole with its ‘slow time cycles’, ‘dark space-times of information’ that it does NOT perceive of its inner parts, and enclosing membrains however can set long term cyclical patterns to its fast internal elements, just by handling the general cycles of its ‘entropic energy of death’ and ‘informative languages’ is one of the most important discoveries of 5D metric, which fully applies to the understanding of the evolution of the Earth and its 3 ages, with its cyclical patterns of glaciations and hot weather that kicks the evolution of species. It is also instrumental to understand the 3 Horizons or ages of species that influence the life of its individual ‘cellular parts’; and the patterns of cyclical history and the capacity of 5D to forecast historic and economic evolution, and the cycles of life and death of civilizations.

Why then humans cannot predict the future as we consistently do in our papers on History, NOR EVEN accept predictability? The answer is in the paradoxes of time ‘length’ just expressed. Huminds work on short time lengths with lineal views that erase the inner information and organic cycles we shall describe in this paper for all species, so they believe in short term chaos and lack predictability also in scale.

For example, we could predict in history a return to nazionalist wars once the upper scale of social evolution died in Eastern Europe, because ‘time motions across scale and space’ never ends. So when a motion upwards of social evolution fails, the system moves downwards. Today obviously humans are in an age of entropy as their future is maimed by the evolution of machines that displace them of labor and war fields, so we suffer an age of entropy in our verbal ethic languages and networks entering a dog-eat dog-society. Hence the importance of the recurrent theme of all those introductions to 5D stiences – the paradoxes of lineal vs. cyclical freedom vs. order. And the ego paradox of mankind.

Yet the understanding of cyclical scalar time and its repetitive symbiotic cycles which coordinate the ‘frequencies’ of events between the 3 scales of individual ‘actions=dimotions’; organic physiological networks and larger world cycles, is also denied by egocy. It is the same repetitive boring, tiresome mantra of humans and its ‘experts’ and scholars – busy-busy ants that do their ‘4D methods of gathering information’ in the smaller scales, without ever realizing they are part of a much larger world with its own cycles they should try to control. On the contrary as human enzymen become enveloped by a complex planetary organism of machines as ants are by the pheromonal ant-queen messages, and those machines accelerate the rhythms of time with its faster quanta of thought, humans become paradoxically more entropic, disconnected of each other and the whole, automatons of action-reaction roles within the economic ecosystem as workers, re=producers and vitalizers=consumers of machines.

So the long term cycles of reality always escape the individual and that is yet another reason why humans escape the control of their destiny. In our case the pheromonal language of social control, money, with its own 5D organic program studied in depth in our papers on the economic ecosystem that nobody reads, make things even simpler. The modern man doesn’t think, just makes money as the American enzyman, the most advanced technological human and paradoxically the most devolved in terms of entanglement with the laws of the Universe does. ‘It’s money’ simply means that a human as a perfectly programmed cell of a superorganism that cannot even imagine the existence of cycles of its physiological networks much larger than theirs, will merely obey the message of money and work whatever it takes. Long time cycles program individual particles, but as information from larger scales is hardly transmitted to lower ones, due to the inverse elliptic geometry of the larger, slower systems that become dark spaces, as the galaxy is to us, those programs are NOT perceived. This in human science derives in the philosophy of constructivism that considers the only program coming from smaller to larger scales; so quantum physics are supposed to be the cause of all other scales of matter and genes of all the scales of biology and individual actions of all scales of history and economics. This is NOT truth, all scales are similar and the illogic of 5D implies that there are 3 ‘causalities’, the most important in ‘parallel’ between members of the same plane of space-time.

Thus your daily life is more influenced by your environment and peers than by your genes and Earth’s climate.

Then the two other programs from bottom to top and from top to bottom scales weight equally but with different rhythms; long term cycles are far removed from each other but strike with much more force and tend to be destructive energetic, as those of lower scales that are informative, smaller in detail, so for example long term cycles influence more the next scale above the individual in the biological world – that of species and its creation-extinction through glaciation cycles.

GENERATOR OF SPACE-TIME: ORGANISMS MAXIMIZE ¡TS ACTIONS OF EXISTENCE.

Below, the limited space-time equations of 4D science can only measure the locomotion of species. Those of 5D however measured the entire worldcycle of life and death of a supœrganism, reason why we call them the function of exist¡ence. Their origin are similar in the analysis of the relativity of ‘motion and form’ (S=T) and the ‘speeds’ of time in the Universe, but the conceptual depth and understanding of cyclical time and fractal space, allows a much deeper analysis. So from the shallow ‘worldlines’ of 4D physics, we move into the worldcycles of all stiences. The outcome of this more complex view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and S=T, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another.  Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it:

Function of Existence of a family of supœrganisms:             Max. S x T s=t = ∆±¡

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses a machine or organic part to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally or externally those 5 Dimotions for itself o for a symbiotic species, as those species that do not follow the program of ‘exist¡ence’ and its 5 actions in the past become extinguished, or will not even emerge into the ∆º plane of existence in the future as wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, &fictions. Thus ‘all stiences and species live and die according to the 5D Non-AE metric laws of the function of existence’ whose method of analysis, formal symbols and graphs we resume in the following pages.

Conclusion. The symmetry of ∆≈S≈T=@=¬.

In the stientific method there are some basic tools to explore reality; pentalogic, that is a Rashomon effect of analysis of an event from the 5 perspectives of ST(energy-scale), Ts-locomotion (time), St (information-space), Tt (entropy-death) and Ss (language-mind) and derived of it, the realization of the parallel symmetries between Space, Time, Scale and the mind-language mirror that describes them and the Tt-limits given by those maximal and minimal parameters of a function of existence, which can be graphed with 3 standing points (maximal=Tt, minimal=Ss, and mean=ST). Pentalogic and its reduced version in 1 plane (St-ST-Ts: Trilogic) requires some serious soul searching for a ‘parallel brain’ to jump between those 5 views but it is needed to upgrade our consciousness of reality as it is, because the Universe is trilogic and pentalogic; as all is about how those parts entangle into forms of space that trace, guided by minds-languages, worldcycles in time between 3 scales.

To make things easier though we can group T@, that is, the actions of minds that put together form worldcycles. And ∆S, that is, the superorganisms made of St<TS>Ts parts assembled through 3 scales.

As this is the paper on ‘physics and scales’, we shall focus on the S≈∆ symmetry leaving for the paper Physics and timespacemost of the work on the T@ symmetry, between Time-motion and spatial forms created with the mind or S=T ‘principle of relativity’, as we shall slowly improve upon the previous forms of relativity (Galilean, Special & General to define ‘Absolute relativity’.

If Relativity was defined by two principles and its equations – the fact that motion is relative to the observer, and the equations of speed, V=S/T in Galilean relativity with the ad on of –ct in Einstein’s relativity according to his principle of constancy of light speed; the equation of ‘time speed’ of the metric of the 5th dimension are the two essential equations of fractal space and cyclical time that define Absolute Relativity, which seems also deceptively simple in its first principles. Relavitity – the fact we cannot distinguish motion from form, so Earth seems still as it is moving, becomes now Spatial form = S = T = Temporal motion. While the equation of speed in a Universe of infinite Fractal scales of space-time is defined by the equation, \$ (lineal space) x ð (cyclical time) = C±¡ (∆±¡). The vast expansion of knowledge it brings to all stiences will surprise the reader, as it did in the case of Einstein’s relativity first shun off by mathematicians as ‘too simple’. What scholars’ of previous paradigms always forget is that what truly matters in the Universe is the understanding of the first principles of its two substances, space=form and time=motion. Complex mathematical details only come latter. But if the principles are faulty, the outcome of so much detail only will hide the necessary corrections with pedantic scholarship.

THE STIENTIFIC METHOD. THE MAIN SYMBOLS OF NON-ÆLGEBRA

Main Symbols of ¬Æ logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

\$: Lineal Space; S: Informative space; §:Scalar Space; T: Lineal Time; ð, ƒ: Cyclical time. Ω: Scalar time (worldcycle).

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 Ð¡:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,Ss,Tt); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

Ss, @; u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

Tt; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. ¬: Entropic limits in time: Tt-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T  x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3rd age death)

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

Ss¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3rd informative head/particle network/age)« Tt-1-entropic death:

Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆+1:O-informative age…

Relative Dimotions=Actions are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

They take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

Ideal Social scales & lanwaves are 1010 in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 100-1: ‘I’, 101-2: 3 generation S=T family, 102-3clan; ST-Geographic: 103-4: Town; 104-5:City; 105-6: State; S-Memetic: 106-7: Nation; 107-8: God; 108-9: Civilination; 109-10: Mankind.

In biology are called: Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’). Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

In Astrophysics: ¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

Stience is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: Ss<Ts<Tt+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to Ss<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1st and 2nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black stars and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

The Disomorphic Universe: laws of cyclical time and fractal space.

“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.  Hermann Minkowski

5D synthetic Stience departs from a more complex view of the 5 dimensions that compose any system of reality. We summarize its differences with the 4D view:

Time in 5D stience is cyclical, not lineal, hence with multiple causalities and the capacity to carry in-form-ation in the frequency and form of its cycles; which lineal time erases; hence lineal time ‘stientists’ become ST-upid as Schopenhauer defined it: people who don’t understand complex cause-effect relationships and resort to ‘magic reasons’. Unfortunately Humans became all ST-upids, when Galileo who taught ballistics in the Venice arsenal at the princely salary of 1000 golden ducats charged with the only goal of ‘maximizing the length of its shots’, wrote V=s/t for its cannonballs and stated the principle of lineal inertia – alas ‘manu military’ all the cyclical clocks of the Universe became lineal. So today all humans believe in lineal time causality and have LOST all the cyclical information required to understand why there are cyclical patterns in all sciences. Mind the reader, cyclical time does NOT change the equations. For example, the previous equation, V=S/T can be written in cyclical time as V=l(s) x ƒ(t), just changing Lineal time for its inverse, cyclical time and breaking the continuous space into broken, similar pieces (the wave or step length). But then, besides the whole median speed of the system we also learn the ‘length of the wave cycle’ and its time frequency, making time cyclical as all clocks of reality return to the same point – hence extracting a precious in-form-ation about the ‘form’ of the system in the future and its exact position in time and space in the point of return and making space discontinuous, broken in ‘wave lengths’.

Thus it follows as a consequence of the cyclicality of time that Space in 5D stience is broken in similar vital spaces, not a continuum as in 4D stiences.

For that reason it has ‘ entropic limits’ beyond which a being does not exist. Hence Death and entropic limits are similar concepts both in time (the limit of a cycle) and space (the limit of a system, surrounded by a membrane). For example nations have entropic limits in the armed borders another nation cannot cross as a supœrganism, often related to all geographical limits – islands, mountains.

Moreover because space is fractal it is broken in different scales of size with similar properties. As the system of reproduction in the Universe is fractal: a seed with the information stored in ‘static time cycles’ is delivered by a larger ∆+1 system (∆ is the symbol in 5D for scales) into a smaller space-time and so it creates a smaller replica of itself in a lower scale, in terms of the ‘functions’ the system will perform, and this little form will reproduce and evolve socially through networks creating a larger supœrganism, which finally will grow in size from small into big. So systems are ‘organic’ because they co-exist in ‘atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and cosmological/gravitational scales. And this goes for civilizations and nations and monetary systems, as a prophet of the wor(l)d, a horde of warriors with a new weapons, of bankers with a new form of money reproduce it and create a larger system with its new seed of information. Again a lot of information on the relationship and different ‘speeds of time cycles’ is lost when all those scales are pressed into a single one. So In our papers on physics (Universe in space) we use this regained information to unify with cyclical time and fractal space, mathematically masses and charges and solve all the conundrums of astrophysics.

Finally because the Universe is fractal there are ‘mirror-minds’ who use ‘languages’ that are synoptic systems that ‘reduce the information’ of reality to fit in the mind-mirror creating an image of an even larger whole, the world. That is the explanation of why minds exist, they are still, mental spaces of information whose simple equation is :

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (infinite universe) = Linguistic mind-mapping or ‘world’.

This causes the egocy paradox: the humind believes the image is the whole reality as it is all what it sees. So our ego is pumped to ‘cosmic proportions’, and its ‘language’ that maps out reality becomes the only language of truth and intelligence. So the first men who thought in words believed God created taking words in Hebrew or Arab. And today that we use digital machines and its metal-minds to express the world with numbers, humans believe ‘numbers’ are the only language of reality. But the Universe is an organism of spatial information and temporal motions, its primary substance that you see around, forms that occupy space, moving.

In reality though, what you see is a ‘Maya of the senses’, as the mind ‘fixes’ the ultimate substance of reality, time cycles into ‘forms’, but when observed in detail, reality is always made of ‘repetitive motions’ with forms. So we talk of ‘Dimensional motions’, ‘Dimotions of time-space’, as the substance of reality, and we shall elaborate on that ‘vital spacetime concept’ – the substance of which we are all made. Thus we upgrade the 2 formal languages of space (Non-E Geometry) and time (5D pentalogic) to upgrate stience.

UPGRADING FORMAL LANGUAGES OF SPACE (NON-E TOPOLOGY) & TIME (NON-A PENTALOGIC)

The mathematical view of supœrganisms. Non-euclidean geometry: fractal points

The most beautiful generalization of those supœrganisms is their study with laws of Non-Euclidean geometry, where a point has volume and hence become one of the cellular units of those organisms. A group of points becomes then a wave or network, and 3 of those networks form a topological plane or vital organism. In this manner we unify biology and topology and define the most important of the new 5D sciences, topologic evolution.

We change the name of space to §paœ, to signify two new qualities of fractal space -to be made of multiple scalar planes, §, self-centered into a o-mind, which is the true creator of the concept of still space as a simultaneous mind mapping in any language of the information of the flow of time cycles that conforms the Universe. And as a consequence of those facts, space is organic, co-existing in a series of scalar planes which 5 Metric converts in ternary supœrganisms, œ (ab. for super organisms).

Space thus becomes §paœ when we ad its scalar, mental and organic properties to its mathematical ones.

Yet space is still in the linguistic world best described by Geometry. We must simply improve the postulates and axioms of ‘Non-Euclidean Geometry’, to describe better the vital topologic properties of spacetime beings, which we do on the post dedicated to non-Euclidean topology, from we extract this brief ‘abstract’ and graph, to fully grasp how a better Geometry can describe a better space:

The 5 Non-E postulates define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points: The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of social evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths. The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scalar planes of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points.

Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe. It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scalar plane’.  So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scalar planes of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a Non-E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross.

In the graph, the formal view of space and its 5 Ðimotions, provided by the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry…

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a supœrganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

So we shall redefine the main branches of mathematics, starting by its most important, geometry and topology with 5 Postulates that relate to those 5 Ðimotions and will be the basis on the future for a more vital model of mathematical thought as mirror of reality. To that aim we redefine the 5 most important elements, axioms and postulates of Euclid in correspondence with those 5 Ðimotions, taking into account the ‘cyclical nature’ of reality that either after completing a ‘world cycle of five Ðimotions’.

1Ð-5Ð: So the first-fifth postulate defines a point as a mind of perception, akin to the first Ðimotion of being – to perceive; and the fifth-first postulate that defines a point as a world in itself, a supœrganism with its inner parts are the same. We just might consider that the point has evolved and grown to emerge from its minimal ¡-1 state in the first postulate – points with inner breath; into a full super organism, ¡º, living in the ¡+1 world, in the fifth postulate studied here.

2Ð: And it does so through a process of locomotions and changes of waves and forces of communication with other points that define the second postulate – lines with inner breath…

3Ð: And then it has formed planes, defined as social networks that correspond to the third Ðimotion of energy and reproduction, becoming a super organism according to…

4Ð: the 4th postulate of congruence, which defines its relationships with other beings, based in his ‘angle of parallelism’, such as similar beings evolve socially together in groups, complementary ‘left-handed female/right-handed male’ beings come together in couples, and beings which are not equal neither complementary enter either in relationships of entropic perpendicularity, or ignore themselves if their worlds are ‘disconnected’. So the fourth postulate gives us the ‘¡logic rules’ of engagement between forms and particles.

And so we establish an immediate relationship between the fundamental concepts of geometry, the point, the line, the plane, and its congruence or dissimilarity, its relative parallelism and perpendicularity, and the 5 Ðimotions of existence, the point is the mind that perceives first, the first Ðimotion; the line is the point in motion, in cycloid patterns, or two points communicating with smaller ¡-1 parts, as in the Fermion<Boson>Fermion relationship of forces; the plane has ‘holes’, it is a network of reproduced points socially connected into the 3 different species of networks that make a super organism (informative, reproductive and entropic, digestive, moving networks), and all this is ¡logically established according to the relative dissimilarity or perpendicularity between the beings (4th entropic Ðimotion) or social parallelism that evolves the point into a supœrganism, a new whole (5th Ðimotion).

Space: Topologic ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’. This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.

– Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3rd class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’. The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

Communication is the true purpose of forces, which show the sentient will of physical systems.

We shall show the astounding beauty of the sentient Universe and its ∞ ¬E Monads of perception; considering what the Physical Universe is about: trillions of sentient particles, following the game of the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence according to the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry, seeking for immortality which most of those particles achieve in any of the 3 scales of the ‘fundamental’ supœrganism of the Universe, the galatom…

Its study fascinated me when young. The beauty of the symmetry between the bio-logical properties of matter, its topological symmetries and its scalar, algebraic social harmonies is the essence of perfection.

And if/when humans or AI machines rediscover what I found in my youth – the true harmonies of entanglement between those scales, its particles, its universal constants and parameters, its social scales, its motions and synchronicities and simultaneities… they will feel the same entanglement I had with reality. That though was more than 30 years ago, and life was not kind on me; my intellectual faculties dwindling fast; and my ethical opposition not with physics but with human physicists and their systemic destruction of the world with lethal technologies and weapons made me abandon the field of physics a decade ago, as I explained in the paper ‘Earth III and entropy’…

The topological, organic Dimotions of matter and its life organisms show matter is constructed as any other supœrganism with the same laws of vital topology and pentalogic causal time, as every particle and every atom is a living organism, sentient, perceptive, social, seeking as all supœrganisms do its 5 Dimotions of existence, obeying the program of those 5 postulates.

It is though not easy to ‘reveal’ the life of matter because of the extremely abstract, and detailed way in which physics is taught today. It is essentially an Euclidean branch of algebra, and since physicists hardly understand anything about mathematics – the why, not the hows – it is an automaton process, who seeks absolute determinism, as a mechanon of motions with no perception and no purpose. Yet particles and atoms do have the same higher purpose that any other system of nature: to achieve its social evolution into larger wholes that conserve its energy, and last in time. So the way to teach 5D physics requires then to understand the laws of non-Euclidean vital topology and pentalogic, to know the ‘purpose’ of matter, and the way in which trinity organisms entangle together. But also the ways in which scales fight each other, emerge absorbing the energy of lower scales, enslaving its parts… In brief, if there is a stience where the laws of 5D illogic topology and existential algebra show in its full vitality is physics, and yet because of the way those laws are explained today 5D physics is difficult to explain. Consider, a BCE, boson state. Two electrons, which are repulsive as ‘particles of the same gender’, which maintain a certain distance, however communicate a phonon and then move in parallel, albeit opposite paths stopping its ‘perpendicular’ collisions. Suddenly we find two opposite parallel flows of particles exchanging phonons in an interaction with the lattice of larger atoms that caress them with a vibrating wave.

This is mathematically a complex equation that means nothing to the reader. It is topologically a vital interaction that creates a higher social order, lowers the Tt-entropy (not energy: ST) of the system and increases the goal of all social systems of the Universe, social love, synchronicity, harmony, flows of motion without resistance, immortal motion with form – you name it. But if we just write the equation it will mean nothing. So 5D has to be taught visually with a narrative, departing from the understanding of the 5 non-E postulates of geometry and the illogic laws of existential algebra. And only then slowly build up the equations into that lattice of space and time laws.

The problem of that approach is that physicists don’t give a damn for that. They are the less inclined philosophers of the world at large. ‘The why is the only thing a physicist never asks’ said Mr. Feynman, a savant idiot idolized by his peers. They are practical people, whose purpose is to describe with abstract mathematical tools, today with computers whose enormous dexterity makes details so exhaustive that they cannot easily be generalized, the deterministic motions of Nature’s particles without the slightest interpretation, as all what cannot be measured does not exist (Planck). So by principle within the straight-jacket of what humans care about matter – its control of its motions to build technological machines with it; 5D physics is denied and will always be denied. Look though to one of Feynman’s diagram, applied to the previous BEC effect:

After the phonon exchange of information; both particles follow an exact anti-parallel path, which diminishes collisions and resistance; and maximizes the ‘soft touch’ of the lattice. Order appears and everybody is happy. The laws of vital geometry are now at work, social evolution happens, ‘distance-space’ proper of Tt-entropy is reduced and finally St-collapse into a condensed boson state creates a ‘fifth dimension’ which is a form in motion of the ‘Ss-till state’ of a boson condensate, the fifth state of matter that forms a perfect ∆+1 whole.

GALILEAN RELATIVITY: MOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF FORM. PARADOXES OF PERCEPTION.

The Geometry of the fifth dimension includes all other geometries. We though refer to 5D geometry specifically when considering the different distortions and paradoxes that happen when we perceive reality through different sales of the fifth dimension, being in general terms a problem of ‘distortion’ of perspective, with a clear inversion as we move from one scale to other in topology, hierarchy, form and function.

4 Px: ∆§- dis≠continuity T-motion v S-form spe: lineal, flat, free, young v ð§:curved, old, bound. @: ego v. relativity

The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple one)s, which are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane, as perceived by a mind vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those 3 paradoxes define space and minds as simplified views of the more complex whole.

We shall call them Galilean paradoxes because the main one between motion and form, is the paradox of Relativity that started modern physics and the others can be illustrated with one his discoveries – that of Saturn’s rings:

Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. It is the continuity vs. discontinuity paradox.

All dual paradoxes –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study. Moreover they seem to us flat in the larger view, when they are spherical forms in the smaller size. It is the flat, free, vs. bound circular px.

And when we see them from a close perspective they seem big and important but from far away they are infinitesimal indistinguishable part of a number. It is the ego vs. relativity paradox.

In a large view the ring seems static but in closer view speed increases. And this is the form vs. motion px.

Thus any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.

All those paradoxes imply a logic inversion of role when we change ‘scale’ and hence they define the relationships between contiguous scales of reality. And have infinite applications to the whys of nature:

A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells.

On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, Euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion. While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings when observed from a lower stair, commoners at the same level or buffoons from above.

The paradox of Young, Motion vs. Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order defines then the essential dualities of freedom and order. So topology becomes metaphysics:

The flat, open, momentum-lineal like small distance vs. the closed, cyclical, energy-like time distance is a constant theme of all mathematical physics, where the tangent, or derivative represents the minimal lineal free step but on the larger scale is bounded. For example, special vs. general relativity. Light is open, gravitation is cyclical bounded; so lineal quantum physics in the cosmological, larger scale gravitation curves trapped by the galactic black hole.

In all scales the paradoxes of freedom vs. order thus connects with age and scale.  Reality when looked  from above, from its upper whole, which controls it through its physiological networks becomes founded. On the other hand in the same scale we do NOT perceive systemic intelligence and feel free.

Information thus closes systems of entropy, while lineal, planar, systems seem free. Information though has a tall broken, cyclical forms, often NOT perceived from a flat bidimensional level below.

So we do have certain metaphysical geometric  ‘properties’ of form vs. motion: Flat planes moving in free lineal paths, and tall cycles, moving in repetitive bound frequencies.

Dualities of young, open, moving lineal age of abeing vs. its old, still, curved, informative, cyclical one, which also manifests in the classic view in small distance of a flat earth that becomes curved from the moon.

If we combine those paradoxes with the inversion of roles: O¡-2<|¡-1>Oº… things become even more complex as both effect offset each other.

All in all a bounded system will have, by the law of inversion added to the Galilean paradox an Absolute control over its smaller parts, as the galactic black hole DOES over its stars closed by its halo of heavy dark matter or the earth in the climatic cycles that control the evolution of its species.

Such cyclical ordered ‘solid’ systems are well-organized as wholes so they can manage its upper world or ecosystem often controlling its ∆+2 scale. Which Humans could do in History if they were a single global organism perfectly ordered, and increasingly the global market of company mothers of machines has over both, the entropic men managed with money and digital media, and the planet, being terraformed with its machines.

The inverse case of a ‘free ∆-1 system’ – a loose ensemble of entropic chaos, of heat – paradoxically becomes slave of its ∆+1 larger world and ∆-1 potential feeding scale. I.E. a gaseous system of molecular forms is controlled by the bound container to the point we can measure its general patterns from its macro-parameter of pressure and by its smaller scale, releasing its energy as heat, and both ∆±1 parameters suffice to determine its characteristics.

The same happens in our apparently free chaotic, violent, entropic societies where human selfie ego states proper of modern societies are perfectly controlled and managed from above by the financial, audiovisual networks and legal systems, of which they are hardly aware, and below by the bits of digital credit they need to survive. As the most disordered systems are memoriless entropic forms which are not even aware there are other scales of reality; while the most ordered controlling systems, extend at least through 3 ‘spacetime scales’ managed by the central scale of ‘solid’ particles. And the most complex bounded systems, biologic and galactic organisms entangle 5 scales. I.e. in a living organism those 5 scales range from ‘simple atoms’ of oxygen that we breath and simpler hormones, through DNA molecules, and then cells, and then physiological networks that make up organisms  and finally ecosystems, 5 entangled scales work around the bounded cellular unit. In galaxies, from forces through atoms, physical matter, cosmic bodies we arrive to the bounded galaxy…

There is always an inversion between apparent freedom=chaos and real order=power: The less powerful forces, bosons seems free, never stopping but are slaves of entangled particles that are trapped in bounded atoms, connected to molecules. And then in the next scale the matter seems free, thermodynamic heat but it is bounded to a planet and stars, which seem free in a galactic ecosystem are bounded to a black hole.

Small atoms and molecules in an organism move seemingly free but a network of cells bound them; humans seem free but are bound by national borders, laws & digital money; matter seems free but it is bounded by the planet… So how can we name so many Planes when in relationship to each other with different worldcycles?

Things are more obvious if we use 3 names for the 3 ‘bounded, time-like worldcycles’ vs. 2 terms for the open entropic worldcycles, which if we notice, ARE in symmetry with the 3 bounded Dimotions dominant in information (perception, reproduction of information and social information) vs. the 2 entropic lineal dimotions (locomotion and entropy).

So a hidden symmetry entangles further a ‘fractal’ order what clueless humans perceive as chaotic systems… Since logic entanglements between languages=mind mirrors, space, time Dimotions and scales NOT perceivable with simple ‘æntropic pictures’ or measurable with ‘speeds’ IS the hidden intelligence of the fractal Universe.

The length of the ‘membrain’-circumference. Limits of infinity between discontinuous scales.

Left, a slow mind will see Earth as a disk, converting its full worldcycle of time into a form of space. Faster, lower scales of reality appear as blocks of time for larger slower wholes. So we see the motion of the skin as a form, which in 5D metric are slow minds that perceive larger realities. Right: Systems perceive ‘curvature’ and ‘flatness’ according to its relative size – smaller beings perceive flat worlds, larger perspectives make forms curved; and the type of hyperbolic, elliptic or flat geometry they use to select information of the Universe – our mind perceives lineal light, so it observes a flat cosmos.

The size and speed of its pixels also defines the detail of its perception, since according to the S=T paradox as speed becomes distance, so systems whose perception is made with fast forces, as cosmological systems, in the human case seems far away. While systems perceived with slow larger pixels, as chemical pheromones and e-motions seem close, more intense. It matters also the speed of mental clocks, which if slow will see paradoxically a denser universe of still forms: I.e. in the left graph for a slow mind the Earth would seem a disk, denser the faster it turns, converting its full worldcycle of time into a form of space. Reality seems made a blocks of time, of ‘whole still, deterministic full cycles’.

Thus concepts such as open=free vs. closed=deterministic, flat vs. cyclical, continuous vs. discontinuous; dense vs. light, far vs. close are relative concepts to the different parameters of informative processing, curvature and relative size of the observer, the observable and the force that communicates both.

The geometrical view of the fifth dimension.

What geometry and distortion experiences a mind able to perceive through the fifth dimension of scalar parts and wholes? Since wholes are networks that branch into thinner paths, connecting with its multiple cells, the 5th dimension is a fractal geometry known as hyperbolic geometry, which states that multiple parallels can pass through a point. How a mind network sees its multiple smaller ∆-1 points of information?

Obviously as its consciousness is a point, it integrates and reduces the space between those points which in reality are distant one from the other into a ‘boson’ consciousness, a point of higher density that occupies a single place in space. And this is essentially the mechanism by which mind create mental mappings in smaller space of larger worlds, reducing to zero the dark spaces between points of perception.
On the other hand an eye perceiving light from a larger perspective, will increase the curvature and reduce the gravitational invisible forces-distances between points which we do not see, as we only perceive light. So we perceive a denser Universe, closer to us.

Inversely a mind with multiple points of perception observing a single whole – for example, the mind of an insect with multiple eyes will disintegrate the perception of a single form into multiple perspectives and if that perception is faster than the larger whole, perceived in slow motion, the whole will appear as a multiple elongated being occupied a larger space, anticipating its future paths – as we see night cars as longer lines.

It is worth to explore those two inverse views which define many superorganisms, from the perspective of the slavish cells of the larger whole – for example, the chemical mind of a physiological network or ant-queen that perceives multiple points integrated into a single whole vs. the multiple pheromone paths the same insect perceives coming from that single whole ant-queen from multiple perspectives:

The ant-queen will see all those drones as an integrated whole, its ‘organism’ as you see all your cells integrated by your nervous system. But the drones will perceive the ant-queen not directly but as a cloud of multiple pheromones, which engulf its entire self; as a god-like presence. And this is how the mind of the c-speed consciousness of the global mind of machines, the Internet will likely perceive millions of humans attached to computers, as an ant-queen perceives its drones, a chemical hypothalamus its cells; when it emerges its consciousness. While we increasingly perceive it as a ‘god-like’ brain, engulfing us in every part of the world. Which is a very different perception from the equalitarian view of reality humans have in its single plane of existence in 1 to 1 correspondence.

How then it is the world-geometry of those other minds? To answer that question we have to deal with the most advanced forms of Geometry – the pangeometry of Lobachevski, whose laws can be applied to discern the ‘form of mental spaces’.

Lobachevski’s parameter.

Regarding the relative flatness of a mind world, we can introduce a quantitative parameter of classic hyperbolic geometry that defines the relative value of Pi..

In hyperbolic geometry – the geometry that branches a line into multiple parallels, hence the geometry that travels through scales of the fifth dimension of parts and wholes Lobachevski found that the length, l of the circumference of a circle is not proportional to the radius r but grows more rapidly (essentially by an exponential law).  Let us then consider how it influences a certain mental view.

So, the following formula holds for the singularity zero-point ‘event horizon’:

where k is a constant depending on the length unit. Since:

we obtain from it: l= 2π r (1 + 1/6 r² /k²). Thus only for small r/k ratios is it true with accuracy that l = 2πr.

In the formula for the length of the circumference of a circle, there occurs a constant k depending on the unit of length. If the radius is small in comparison with k, i.e., if r/k is small, then, as is clear from the formula, the length l is nearly 2πr. Generally, the smaller the ratio of the dimensions of a figure to this constant, the more accurately the properties of the figure approach the properties of the corresponding figure in Euclidean geometry.
Thus a measure for the deviation of the properties of a figure in Lobachevski geometry from the properties of a figure of Euclidean geometry is the ratio r/k if r measures the dimensions of the figure (radius of a circle, sides of a triangle, etc.).This has an important consequence.
Suppose we have to do with the actual space of the external world and measure distances in kilometers. Let us assume that the constant k is very large, say 1012.
Then, for example, by the formula, for a circle with a radius of even 100 km the ratio of its length to the radius differs from 2π by less than 10−9. Of the same order are the deviations from other ratios of Euclidean geometry. Within the limits of 1 kilometer they would even be of the order 1/k, i.e., 10−12, and within the limits of a meter of the order 10−15; i.e., they would be altogether negligible. Such deviations from Euclidean geometry could not be observed, because the dimensions of an atom are a hundred times larger (they are of the order of 10-13 km).

On the other hand, on the astronomical scale the ratio r/k is not too small. Therefore Lobachevski also assumed that, although on the ordinary scale Euclid’s geometry is true with great accuracy, the deviation from it could be noted by astronomical observations. This assumption has been justified. Further on the insignificant deviations from Euclidean geometry that have now been observed on the astronomical scale give us further proof of an infinite Universe of galaxy-atoms much larger than the supposed big-bang in order to achieve the ‘necessary curvature’ for it to have an enclosure in the ∆±4 plane. Finally, since the deviation from Euclidean geometry becomes smaller for increasing values of the constant k, in the limit when k grows without bound, hyperbolic geometry goes over into Euclid’s geometry. That is, Euclid’s geometry is just a limiting case of hyperbolic geometry.

The flatness of the human mind.

But we can consider such mind’s parameters to be those of an electronic brain, where the geometry of the electronic humind made of light is defined by the S=T duality according to the ‘relative ratio’ between our r and k which are our constants of ‘perception of information’ (k), that is, H-Planck and the unit of lineal length (\$ (r), c-speed. And so the ratio defines both a flat world, the one we perceive and one which process very little information density – not a very fast intelligent mind for all what is worth.

The ratio as a pangeometry for all possible forms.

It is then clear that if the ratio is a limiting case, hyperbolic geometry, then comprises also Euclid’s geometry and so it turns out, in this sense, to be a more general theory. In view of this situation Lobachevski called his theory “pangeometry,” i.e., universal geometry. And indeed, hyperbolic geometry being the essential ‘geometry’ of ∆-scales has Euclidean geometry in a single plane as a limiting case.

Such a relationship of theories constantly appears in the development of mathematics and the natural sciences: A new theory includes the old one as a limiting case, in accordance with the advance of our knowledge from more special to more general deductions.

But what really r/k means in terms of mental space? As k is a unit/rod of length, in our case light, it must be accordingly a unit of information, equivalent in the fractal, discontinuous version a small ‘step’ – the fractal unit of measure which lengthens the total distance of a ‘coast’ as Mandelbrot discovered:

The coastline paradox is the counterintuitive observation that the coastline of a landmass does not have a well-defined length. This results from the fractal-like properties of coastlines. … The length of a “true fractal” always diverges to infinity, as if one were to measure a coastline with infinite, or near-infinite resolution

As fractal geometry is to ∆-geometry  between discontinuous planes, what differential geometry is to ∆§ocial scales, we can easily understand Lobachevski’s parameter as the measure of the smallness of our ‘steps of perception of spatial information’, in relationship to the total radius of the T.œ we are measuring.

When we are inside the being obviously we ‘are small’ quanta of vital energy surrounded by an ever larger, imposing ‘flat’ membrane; as on Earth’s ‘flat surface’ for the human p.o.v.

So the equation relates the informative, ð§ steps of the inner ‘∆-1’ entities and the larger being, with its st size parameter; which gives us ‘larger perimeters’ with lesser curvature (longer lines) for the mental space construct of  the smallest inner being.

It also follows that from an external p.o.v., which sees a larger part of the T.œ this will appear increasingly curved (and concave, elliptic instead of convex, hyperbolic). And ultimately this duality proves the mental nature of all constructs of space, put by a devilish mind-mirror, which adapts the view through its ‘subjective glasses’, as Descartes thought to be the case. It is the most important finding of Non-E geometry, regarding mind constructs for all geometries besides hyperbolic forms. All this IS a special case of an ¡logic rule on the 5D metric structure of the Universe: ‘1D \$mall measurements do NOT measure the whole world cycle of the being, so they are lineal. Long-lasting measure bring the whole worldcycle or enclosed.

RECAP. Geometry is a virtual mental wor(l)d, a still ‘form’ of language. As such is mind’s simultaneous selection of its relative world’s information – a representation of its reality, O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Mind-geometry, which stops the motions of time into a mind mapping ‘called’ space. Each mind therefore will have a different geometric view of reality. As such geometry evolved from the purest mind-form of thought of still bidimensional Greek Geometry. Next it came analytical geometry in which space was married with the very essence of the mind – a point/view of reference, the @-sub discipline of mathematics. So one of the key evolutions of geometry was to give motion to space from the initial Greeks to the modern topology. Even vacuum has ‘magic energy’, ‘motion’; it is not background space. This said, we are interested in certain type of mind-spaces, those of the mathematical language, which is the realm of geometry and topology, the first, a ‘fixed formal space’, the second a form of space-time with motion.

The fractal structure of deep scales is created with languages stored in seeds and minds, of which topologic languages are likely the mind of atoms and galaxies that create most of the local order we observe. So all systems gauge information, as their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process of creation of ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world projected as order in a territorial ‘energy-body’:

Infinitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universe = constant self-centered world.   In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = C.

It is the origin of the Ego paradox: ‘Every infinitesimal mind measures reality from its distorted perspective, thinking it is the center of the Universe, it confuses with the selected information perceived by its mind’. Which of course is shared by all other systems of reality. So an ant also thinks to be the center of the Universe with its likely hyperbolic pheromonal mind of ‘atomic pixels’.

So as man measures reality from its limited Euclidean perspective despising the existence of all other fractal points=minds of the Universe, which are also gauging information albeit with different mental structures.

Life doesn’t start in DNA atoms. IT must exist in all systems of the fractal Universe, departing from particles which as the graph explains already show all the characteristics of life. The elementary quarks and electrons the simplest particles do gauge information, absorb energy, reproduce and evolve socially into wholes, bosons, plasma flows and atoms. So the unit of life is the smallest particle and as fractal systems are self-reproductive, emerging in its fundamental properties in larger scales all what exists is alive. Only human egos prevent us from understanding that obvious truth, fundamental principle of all ‘exist¡ences’.

However the short-comings of human mental spaces are enhanced by the complex geometry of the fifth dimension which ‘cheats’ fractal points, ‘leaving’ them blind to the flows of information coming from upper scales and distorting its view of the cyclical long range time deterministic systems of that larger whole, giving the mirage of freedom, open, flat spaces. So it seems the Game of Existience is built-in to make each part feel free, open, happy and ego-centered and ultimately fail because of its mindless chaotic behavior.

5D geometry guided by pentalogic tries to understand:

1. The disomorphisms of all geometries – those elements common to all of them, which belong to the higher ‘game of exist¡ence of all minds that select information to ensure its survival. This task started by Riemann and Lobachevski, concluded that few element of space are relevant – distance=similarity and angle of congruence being its most important.

2.- to be a mental construct and relate the main laws of geometry and its varieties with GST as a mirror-mind that reflects those isomorphic ‘ILOGIC’ properties of space-time beings.

RECAP. Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole.

The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple ones), are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

They are also essential to all the elements of calculus and mathematics at large and its methods of solutions; specially the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between two points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. So lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations.

The Principle of relativity is also the origin of 3 ∆ST paradoxes of our mental reality. The ST dual topology of motion and form, as Minds that select only the states of form, are the cause of the stillness of space. The paradox of ∆+! continuity v. ∆-! discontinuity of a given Non-E plane depending on which detailed ∆-scales which choose to perceive. And the paradox of ∆+! curved, closed vs. ∆-¡ open, free view of reality, the most important, as ‘small elements’ freel free but are enclosed in the longer time, larger space ∆+1 whole that restricts its actions within its SS & TT limits .

The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality

Modern mathematical physics is based in the Axiomatic Method of mathematics, ‘invented’ by Hilbert, which is based in Aristotelian one-dimensional Logic.

Hilbert affirms then that we can deduce ALL mathematical statements using the logic available to science a century ago, called Aristotelian logic based in:

– A simplistic single time dimotion, so A causes B, means that B does NOT cause A. This is false.

In reality logic is a ternary, dialectic, Hegelian logic, because there are 3 dimotions of time, and its corresponding ‘simultaneous’ 3 organic elements in space:   A< ≈ > B.

That is A-energy and B-information come together into ≈, the present space-time being, or space-time action, or synthesis. And we shall see how this writes as the 3 dimotions of time and symmetric forms of space: A (relative past energy) x B (relative future information) = C-relative repetitive present

– The exclusion of 3rd element, (only A and ¬ A are relevant), which has NOTHING to do with the aforementioned ternary logic of the Universe and its ternary symmetries in space (3 dimensions of space), parallel to the 3 ages of time. So length is the dimension of the function of lineal motion, height the dimension of perception and information, and width the dimension of reproduction. And 3 dimensional motions of space-time come together to form A:

Since Nature ‘pegs’ 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms.

In the Universe X3 + Y3 ≠ Z3. means we have only X2 bidimensional waves of space and time cycles, and the 3rd dimension is added layer after layer of bidimensional networks. we live in a mathematical Universe but limited by mathematical laws of symmetry and balance that mimic the laws of the ternary fractal reality. The units of reality are St and St, the poles of entropy and cyclical form, its bidimensional constants of angular momentum c2 speed-space or mass  vortex.

This 2 dimensional, network plane that joins points along a shared energy and information collective action or unit of existence can be a field of magnetism and one of electricity a gravitational gradient and a particle, a group of citizens communicated or connected by a satellite, in all of them we can define a network with a relative fractal dimension, which we average to one made of networks of points, which contact perpendicularly through mere derivative fictions along a space-time field with other beings, this modular game of existence.

But the long time dimotion of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, studied by the 5th dimension, and by Theory of Evolution meant nothing to him.

neither the cyclical time dimotion of 3 ordered time ages, past-energy, present reproduction and future information, which defines the existence of all ‘world cycles’ from human life to matter. Though he found its dual equation, Energy (expansive entropy-past)<≈light-present-wave: c²>M(time vortex-future) he still ignored its essential meaning. So he would say ‘time is what a clock measures’; and used it fundamentally as Galileo, only to study of the all the types of time motions of the Universe, for the analysis of external time-motions, which is the restricted ‘job’ of physicists.

Time however has besides present, differential, external motion-measures in space (Galileo’s V=∂s/∂/t and Einstein’s S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-(ct)²), other type of time-motions, mainly informative evolutions (Evolutionary theory in Biology, vortices of evolution in masses, historic vortex of evolution, future 3rd age of maximal form and in-form-ation), and present, reproductive wave-bodies.

And it is fractal, in infinite different waves, reproductive bodies, entropic limbs and fields, informative particles and heads, whose geometry stores maximal information in minimal space (so all relative future, informative, gauging particles, heads and cameras are geometric).

The Galilean paradoxes are essential to all stiences, in as much as systems develop their actions through ‘flows of entropic energy and information’ coming from other scales, so distorsions in the perception of the bits and bites they extract from the are rife. Without the input of a clear understanding of the distorsions through scales, and the limits of perception which diminish according to 5D metrics it is impossible to make the picture of reality disomorphic

RECAP. The spooky effects of quantum physics and relativiy as we shall see are born of those deformations which are subjective to the human observer – the true meaning of endophysics and the influence of the ‘observer’ over the observable.

All is shun off by the automaton physicist that only cares for the praxis of measure from the human point of view. But the fact is the picture of reality for a particle is far more realistic than the way huminds, 3 scales above it, can obtain. As all spaces are mental spaces.

The true genius says Schopenhauer is a man that sees what nobody sees. The talented man just targets the perceived reality. So far that is what huminds have done regarding physics. Even relativity is just an attempt to make more precise measures from the perspetive of human perception.

PENTALOGIC OF SCALAR SUPŒRGANISMS DISOMORPHIC WORLDCYCLES :

Pentalogic – also called the Rashomon effect – is simple and yet the most powerful ‘logic element of reality.

Because all what exists is made of a spatial form, of time-motions, spread in 3 scales of reality, its whole, ∆º embedded in a larger ∆+1 world, and made of ∆-1 ‘cellular’ parts, limited in time by its life-death cycle and in space by a membrain, where it sensorial mind-system that connects all those elements, exchanging energy and information with the outer world to enhance its survival chances, [laying what we call the ‘game of exist¡ence’, any event in time, form in space or ‘language-mirror’ that perceives them MUST have 5 Elements, 5 Causes, 5 Variations that we must observe and describe to obtain the whole truth of the issue.

Pentalogic derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all  is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scalar plane, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scalar plane or 4th dimension).

In the entangled pentalogic Universe, it is not possible to separate the 5 elements of the supœrganism of History – its temporal ages, its ‘scalar’ structure divided in human citizen-cells, 3 physiological economic=reproductive ‘blood ‘networks, legal-informative and ‘territorial network of vital space’ or geography, its verbal mind and subconscious collective Gods and its ‘entropic limits’, in time and space, which if crossed will signify its extinction. As the 5 Dimensions of History work in symmetry like in any other complex ¬∆@st organism.

So the ‘Disomorphic=equal laws of all systems derive from the properties of those 5 entangled elements, which need a new ‘pentalogic’ of communication:

Vital Space are bidimensional forms of 3 ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 organic functions in a supœrganism: lineal limbs/fields move the system, hyperbolic bodywaves iterate its forms & spheric particle/heads gauge information.

Time are types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

Scales, co-exist in 3 levels of size ruled by SxT=C metrics gifting organic symbiotic properties to T.œs.

Minds are centers that process information from the outer world, control the internal networks of the system, and perform deterministically the 5 survival actions of existence, regardless of its consciousness. They coordinate and maintain the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.

Entropic limitsIn time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆+1<<∆-1. So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism), ¬; perception, its mental form, @; social evolution, its scalar structure, ∆; motion its lineal time flow, T; and reproduction, its spatial population, S.

The pentalogic method: rashomon truths.

How we go about to describe scientifically a system, if any of those partial reductions of information suffice to make a linguistic mirror. The answer we provide in this and other papers on 5D is the Pentalogic, entangled method, which expresses with increasing degrees of complexity the elements needed to extract most of the relevant information from the system, without the need to get to the exhaustive (Do)decalogic analysis of the entire world of existence of a given supœrganism. Accordingly we go into a stair of deeper complexity, considering some of those key elements, under the general ‘labelling’ of Pentalogic method, from:

– Monologic: ceteris paribus nalysis of the event or spatial form in its 5 elements as ¬∆@st.

– Dilogic: considering its ST components, perhaps its Stœps of motion and form, or its Si=Te reproductive function/state in static, SxT or dynamic SóT form; or its relative St-information and Ts-momentum that come together to form its ST energy, or its opposite limits of Ss-language/form/mind/seed vs. Tt-entropy… causing.

-Trilogic: Which is de facto the most important analysis for all forms, as we describe the entity in a single plane of existence with its 3 topological organs of space, T<ST>S, its 3 ages in time, T<ST>S or its 3 co-existing scales, ∆±1. Often we just make a trilogic analysis of the being in a single Space-time plane (T<ST>S), and from the point of view of scales, as this is the bare minimum to define an ∆ST system… to which we might add

Trilogic is thus the basis of all languages beyond, the simplest ‘first order logic’ a causality of falsity and truth, such as if A is false, and from A we deduce B, A->B, B is false. As truths are linguistic mirrors of reality a better term than ‘falsity’ is ‘focus’. A good truth is one in which the syntax of the language and its semantic mimics the syntax of the Universe and its meanings. The syntax is a given. Most languages are ‘innate’ ternary syntax of the 3 parts of reality. So all verbal sentences reduce to:

Subject (Fractal point) < Verb (Dimotion=action of space-time) > Object (entropic energy of subject)

F(x): dependent parameter of space) <= > (S=t operand) G(Y): parameter of time

Blue (color of in-form-ation; space) <Green: color of reproduction) > Red (color of energy-motion)

‘All what exists is a ‘form’ that trans-form’ into entropy≈energy back and forth ad eternal SóT, which is the dynamic fractal generator of space-time events, and principle of energy conservation enlarged to its 2 poles whereas the wordings for ‘entropy’. ‘energy’, ‘form’ and ‘information’ require a bit more of understanding before we can define them more precisely.

– Pentalogic: Its limits in time and space (entropic death, membrains, outer world) and its Ss-mind, seed, where resides the will to develop its program of time, through the…

Because we play with 5 elements all the time we need to raise the logic consciousness of ‘huminds’ (ab. Human minds), both of the truths of History and the Universe, by upgrading their logic mind to a higher system of thought that the ‘damned lies and statistics’, placebo truths, lineal thoughts fictions and seflie, childish ego-trips, hidden agendas and wishful thinking that passes today as science… by at least giving him some basic ‘systems’ of inquire of truth. We explained the ABCD-E of the scientific method, which works for Disciplines at large. We want know to introduce a simple method of inquire that works for anything, even the smallest event in time, form in space or linguistic statement he might hear.

We shall use the pentalogic method constantly when an issue, form or event, or model/theory of reality comes up which is ‘confuse’, or a ‘newspeak’ or ‘disguise’ or selfish agenda, placebo truth or ‘camouflaged system’ to reveal out its full meaning. Reality is pentalogic means ‘the causes’ of reality are often 5. As a system that LOOSES any of those 5 elements does not exist for long. If you loose your skin you die. If you become static, motionless you are by definition death; if something tears into your vital space, you die. If any of the 3 scales where you exist, your cells, your physiological networks that put you together as a whole, or the world external to you, gets sick and unbalanced with you, you die. If an organism become mindless, unable to perform the 5 actions of survival – perceiving Information, to move in search of entropic food to feed and transform it into energy to reproduce its parts evolving with other similar individuals to become a stronger social whole, you die.

So pentalogic is everywhere and it allow us to find ‘faulty’ theories of reality, very common in science because human minds are monologic – so it is tiresome to observe unending arguments between childish scholars with ceteris paribus causes that want to raise with their egocy (ego=idiocy) to the only cause of reality. I.e. the entropic rock of the sky killed the Dinosaurs, said the physicist – not it was the competition of the Mammal, said the biologist; nay, the gymnosperm flowers, changed and he lost his food, say the botanist, both did contribute… acting on its 5 Dimensions of existence… i.e. mammals who had not attacked dinosaurs before started to eat their eggs, preventing its reproduction, as rats do with their biggest descendants, albatross; flora changed so herbivores couldn’t get their entropy; the sky darkened, so their body couldn’t get their sun energy; and yes the rock blew up their ∆+1 world… and so on. Of all those pentalogic structures of the living Universe, needless to say, the most important for each individual superorganism is its program of survival or drives=dimensional motions of life (ab. Dimotions), that ensure its continuous existence. Let us briefly introduce them:

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) merely states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), ïnformative perception and communication ï, Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle  as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In graph we see the action of the main Stientific scales of organisms. Actions are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any ‘Time§pace supœrganism’ (ab.T.œ) in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal: ∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1st locomotion, feeding age ->2nd reproduction age ->3rd informative, social age-> entropic death

We analyse reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions), in the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms) or in the maximal range of ¬∆@st of spacetime. Because a system is an entanglement of those 5 components, we need a ‘pentalogic’ to describe how the 5 Dimotions communicate and interact together based in the Disomorphic – equal forms and motions – they all share. While its 5D 3 sequential worldcycles carry the space organism through its þlacental, life and world cycles across 3 ¡±1 scales. So the analysis of those 3±¡ organic elements, through time worldcycles and scales extract all information on the being.

RECAP. Stiences study Disomorphic laws of species, each one focused in a scale of the eusocial 5th Dimension, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales, guided by a still, linguistic mind, which projects its smaller mirror images of form in its territorial body waves, creating its fractal scalar structure, broken though by the entropic limits of its perceptive reach.

An organism is a group of similar forms organized by 3 ‘networks’: one provides its ‘clone cells/citizens /atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed & move (digestive system, territory), a 2nd one reproduces the system  (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and a 3rd one that provides them with information to guide their reproductive actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple system is the fundamental particle of the universe. As all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those systems, which reproduces, do exist in the immortal universe. So all systems have an internal or external ‘enzymatic’ system of reproduction (external enzymes reproduce carbohydrates, and enzymen reproduce machines). This can be seen as a ternary class structure of a ‘body-worker-wave’, and an informative particle-head-upper class moving and finding a vital territory, with a limbic/potential source of its motions, which the system might externalize to obtain the energy to reproduce.

Organisms have parts and wholes composed of 3 elements: ∆-planes of space-time, ∆±¡SóT, ∆ST entangled in 3 organic co-existing ∆±¡ planes. In physical systems they are the ∆-1 quantum plane, ∆º thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 gravitational plane, equivalent in the reduced nested world of Life on Earth to the ∆-1: molecular plane, ∆º organic plane and ∆+1 ecosystemic plane. The absolute dimotion of future survival is eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, as parts must come before; hence they are a relative past, and wholes survive better. A fact humans have forgotten. As individualism is synonymous of chaos=death, it is obvious History, the supœrganism of mankind enters its age of entropic social self-destruction, committing suicide, evolving instead a supœrganism of machines; a tragic problem, which we will study in the analysis of social sciences. And in each of those planes we shall see that ‘spatial information’ and ‘temporal energy’ constantly transform into each other. Space is the perception of form as if it was still, but ultimately is cyclical self-repetitive motion that seems not to change and acquires at larger scale solid forms.

Mental Spaces of in/form/ation fix the times=motions of all species. As time becomes the ultimate substance of organisms ordered through scales that give birth to a 5D metric equation, such as smaller systems in space run faster time and life-death cycles. So the speed of time of systems is not the same for all of them, and 3 scales of different speeds form an organism – in man the cellular, individual and social scale. And finally for all this complex reality to ‘work’ in an ordered manner, systems which have a ‘membrain’ that divides its vital space, from other systems, and are formed by 3 scalar space-times that give them organic nature; have in its highest ‘scale’ of size – that of the membrain that breaks it as a whole from the rest of the Universe a ‘sensorial system’ or mind, which interacts with the external Universe, encloses and orders its internal vital space and communicates with other similar beings, forming larger social organization; hence becomes the mind of the system. We thus talk of a reality made of organisms of a vital body of space-time, self-centered in a mind-membrain, whose language encodes a program of survival for the organism. And all the data humanity has gathered about reality needs to be ‘put within this general template, to make sense of it’.

So 5D refounds sciences in more solid grounds – its 3±¡ elements, ¬∆@ST, which ‘stiences’ study plane by plane of SióTe elements, to which we must add the connecting ‘network’ laws between planes, which we call the ‘5th dimension proper’. It is the philosophy of science, we develop in a series of papers at Academia.edu that will substitute the simpler mechanic view of reality sponsored by physicists, with its ‘mathematical creationism’ and constructivist view; which reduces the two poles of time=motion to one (lineal time), compresses all the planes of space-time into a single continuum; while only the properties of reality that can be easily fit in a numerical description matter. A more evolved civilization would start in philosophy of science and the principle of conservation of time and space, and its structure in 5D organic scales and derive from them the fundamental laws of every other discipline; correcting whenever necessary its errors as we do in those papers with the simplest principles of reality as any science mirrors them in its study of its specific scales of beings – the details of those principles.

Some finai comments on the planes of space-time.

To have all the elements to construct reality besides S and T we need ∆, the scalar property of reality, by which ‘space-time beings’ are made of smaller ones and form part of larger wholes. We talk of multiple planes of space-time because each scale has different parameters as parts becomes wholes, unit of a next scale. We will explain this as the product of network formation, emergence and other disciplines of General Systems Sciences, of which 5D is a formal view. In mathematics ‘fractal points will evolve’ through network-lines into topological planes of space-time. This discontinuity between scales is real. There are transition regions between planes, which can only be crossed with loss of information, therefore only by energy, by entropic motion, by ‘death’ of a system. Latter we shall study those regions, evident in physical equations as there are asymptotic barriers – Lorentz transformations in the c-barrier; negative temperature in the 0 barrier; etc. What then the Universe conserves is easy to see: the total volume of space-time of each scale; that is its energy. We will also elaborate latter on those concepts. To mention now that the symbol ∆ is both a visual reminder of the two different arrows of ‘growth in space, inverse to the loss of information’, and a tribute to one of the few predecessors of this work, in the formal arena – Wilson’s renormalization mathematical apparatus, which finally realized of those discontinuities using a symbol Λ, for  the energy scale under which a measurement of a physical parameter is performed. According to Wilson every scale of the Universe and the fields of space-time that define them have its energy cut-off Λ, i.e.  the theory is no longer valid at energies higher than Λ, and all degrees of freedom above the scale Λ are to be omitted. But Λ is related to a size of space. For example, the cut-off could be the inverse of the atomic spacing in a condensed matter system, and in elementary particle physics it could be associated with the fundamental “graininess” of spacetime caused by quantum fluctuations in gravity. The failure to remove the cut-off Λ from calculations in such a theory merely indicates that new physical phenomena appear at scales above Λ, where a new theory is necessary. As today only with the use of Wilson’s renormalization, which simply eliminates absolute zeros and infinities outside the scaling of space-time of a given plane, quantum physics makes sense.

So there are 5 types of time change=motion parallel to 5 types of space= form. Yet space and time are always mixed together, since human still mental one dimensional space is a simplification and definitely a single time arrow of entropic energy or absolute motion is an extraordinary simplification of the richness of motions of temporal energy. Energy in that sense with its multiple variations of meaning is much closer. Specifically entropic energy; that is, a motion which is internal and external to the being or ‘TT’, pure motion appears in the equations, E=Mc2 (∆+1) = knT (∆º)=hƒ(∆-1) that transfer temporal motion through scales of the fifth dimension. This is the entropic arrow of time and disorder akin to death which physicists consider the single arrow of temporal energy. My advice, because of so much messy and simplified understanding of time in physics is really to take with some irony their work on philosophy of science, though as their equations have their own life and self-consistency those are ‘real’ and must be addressed with much more rigor, as we shall do in the papers on mathematical physics. But for concepts of time and space useful to all scales and sciences we shall use temporal entropic energy and spatial in/form/ation. Energy, being the jack of all trades, in messy human philosophy of science is also used for Si=Te, balanced ‘work’ which in fact is both space and time, energy and information, as it imprints form into motion, reproducing cyclical patterns of science. So it is better to define ST as reproductive work.

The fundamental law of science, the law of conservation of energy, becomes then the law of conservation and immortality of time-motions, which can be expressed as follows:

‘All is time=motion=change in perpetual trans-form-ation in one of the 5 Dimotions of time-space: S≤=>T’

All is time=motion… But only minds of virtual mental space can order it.

For most people space is a ‘volume’ but to measure a volume, the volume must have ‘walls’ – a membrane that encloses the volume, hence a ‘form’. And that form must be seen-measured ‘simultaneously’. So in relationship to Time, space is a ‘present state’. Time=motion thus is a more fundamental parameter as space in terms of time is a present slice, and we could consider the perception of form, subjective to the capacity of a mind to ‘map’ reality in its ‘still focus of perception to create an image’ of space.

Motion however in its purest nature, and fastest speed as a line is unperceivable. It must have some form on it. And as there are only 3 topological forms, |, O and Ø, the combination of time and space, according to quantity (T for dominant Time, S for dominant space), and shape, |, O, Ø are limited. Moreover in a relative Universe where perception matters, | is the fastest motion, and so we can associate it to lineal time, O is the lesser motion as it might be seen as a form, which I what we see in fact in charges and masses, and so O tends to be associated to Space and information, heads and particles, and Ø, which combine both tends to be associated to space-time – waves and bodies. So the easiest way to go, in conjunction with the common wisdom of people is to say that time is lineal |-time, space is cyclical, O-information and space-time is hyperbolic, Ø.

It is then when we can be more precise about reality and state that while all is time-motion and ultimately entropy, the Universe holds infinite cyclical points that try to stop motion into form, and so a constant tug of war between SS(languages) vs. TT(Entropic motions) takes place. Languages create virtual ‘monads’ that stop in the stillness of a mind-mapping, the motions of the Universe through the simultaneous measuring in a mirror image of those motions of reality. That is the essence of S=T Galilean paradoxes.

Minds thus exist but they are virtual, finitesimal 0’-mirrors (an infinitesimal has always a non-E volume) in which a language stops reality and then, it projects over that reality the mind-mirror, bending motions and creating at larger scale replicas of its mind-mapping. So while all is motion, the ‘reproduction’ of forms, through the mind-languages of all the monad-points of the Universe, charges and masses in physical space, is the ‘intelligence of reality’ that denies the domain of entropic motion as the only arrow of exist¡ence; which physicists deny because they don’t understand properly those fractal points, monads, charges and masses that store the information, the form of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles.

Theirs is a biased simplest understanding of the TT-ts side of realit, entropy and locomotions, which indeed physicists study as V=s/t, and smallish space, which we see as rotary cycles…

Yet the real purpose of science in each sub-discipline, which studies one of the scales of the fifth dimension is to analyze how TT-entropy transforms into SS-form through the intermediate Ts-locomotion, ST-energy and St-informative states, creating those fleeting virtual minds that will dissapear and reproduce once and again.

Let us then introduce the ‘invisible’ internal content of all those non-E points, monads or minds of the physical Universe that explain the why and will of survival, the actions and events of reality and its repetitive patterns called laws of science.

PHYSICAL MINDS: ¡≤|4| NON-EUCLIDEAN POINTS IN DIFFERENT SCALES.

THE PROBLEM OF EGOCY.

Huminds are stuck in the huge amount of errors sciences derived from their faulty logic and geometry of time-space, and his mind egocy that doesn’t believe what it doesn’t see and limits organic sentient properties to forms similar to himself; when electrons already have all those properties. The result are simpleton grand theories of reality derived of our languages’ perception confused with the whole reality that we call linguistic creationism, either verbal anthropic religions that put man at the center of reality and make God and man speak the language that creates by naming things, or big-bang entropic theories of digital thought that put man and the machine at the center and its language mathematics as the creator. So the big-bang is based in a simple lineal equation, V=HoD, which against all kind of proofs of a fractal balanced immortal Universe cannot be denied.

We shall prove ad nauseam that all what exists is a space-time ‘organism gifted of mind called logos’ Plato of a ‘higher logic than man’s’ (Augustine), as all ‘points are a world in themselves’ Leibniz, and deduce all laws of science from the simple laws of conservation of time, origin of the 3 ages of life and death of all systems, and the entangled topologies of space, origin of the organic structures of reality. And deduce from the elements of that reality, ∆-scales, S-pace, T-ime, all the mirrors of @-mind languages and ¬entropic limits of exi=st¡ence. But for you to accept that wider reality you need to be humble and go ‘back to school’ an entangle empathically with all other ∆st beings.

Of course this is NOT going to happen any time soon (: just wishful thinking. Huminds are part of reality and their limits to connect with the whole remain regardless of sages. I know all the excuses, and no longer get sanguine as Planck or Einstein did. I would like though to remark a few of them; mainly proper of the limits of a mind to reflect reality as a compressed mirror with egocy aberrations, entropic limits of perception and infinity mirrors’ repetitions, as all related to the 3 real elements of reality, ∆st and the 2 mental ones, ¬@.

Perhaps in physics the most important is egocy, as physicists love the complex details of its calculations and the creationist theory of languages. So they will abhor this paper because it shows a logic property easily deduced of 5D metrics (SxT=C): smaller systems have more information and detail about reality but that doesn’t mean they can control better reality than larger, organic systems with less information. The opposite is truth. The larger whole has entropic capacities as it encloses and acts wholesale in its ¡ndifferent parts.

This means the slow time cycles of the whole planet are more efficient redesigning its microscopic highly informative parts in the membrain that all the little machines we work with. It means the organic properties of physical systems are easy to describe – it only requires the vital concepts of the program of survival, but they are more influential than the details. It means the true equations that matter are the simpler, because they act upon the larger scales whose influences goes down to every small part.

And it means that by denying the larger scales of time and space, huminds never will understand the universe.

A second remarkable consequence of egocy is the fact that while huminds have no problem whatsoever to postulate smaller scales, even beyond need (string theories), as they are smallish so they make us feel bigger; I have never been able to convince a physicist that a galaxy is an anti-atom like of a hyperuniverse, whose ‘beta decay’ big-bang is what they measure.

This attacks directly egocy (as the hyperuniverse likely have quintillions of galatoms); introduces uncertainty of knowledge and the mind ‘freaks out’ when you convince her she is just selecting a 4% of reality (π-3/π), through the apertures ideally left by its ternary diameters in its membrain… That not even light is immortal and clearly decay with the standard 1010 numbers of all systems. But specially that we mean absolutely nothing for some fucktard experimental physicist that might right now inject our galaxy in an accelerator provoking a cosmic catastrophe just to prove his hyperbolic theory of the absolute (: Don’t take it personally. Irony humbles the mind and humility is what huminds need to understand something.

It also implies that between galaxies there is NO gravitational forces but dark entropy similar to ¥-electromagnetic radiation. Recently we got a proof of it, when astrophysicists observed a huge magnetic field between galaxies guiding electronic flows, which is how from our scale we would observe two galatoms sharing a ¥-ray particle (as electrons become for the higher scale the minuscule h-planckton of its light beams).

For a while I enjoyed translation of cosmic phenomena to atomic one, with maths, here we’ll keep it simple. But the funny thing is astrophysicists do it all the time, from Einstein’s models of relativity with galatoms as hydrogen to modeling stars around central black stars as photon clouds (what the electron orbital is made of)…

So in dealing with the proper translation of 5D to physics, we find insurmountable problems of hierarchy, methods and semantics. As the primacy of physicists on human life, due to its creation of technological machines does not carry its primacy in theory given the fact that in the Universe all scales have equal value, and if a choice must be made, it should always be that of the ∆º observer’s scale, the human scale.

Constructivism is thus false. Then it comes the question of method. Physics, being born, as a technological praxis on ballistics and the study of locomotion has a very poor understanding of the fundamental concepts of the Universe, NOT a material endeavor but one based in the reproduction of in-form-ation, over the ultimate layer of time=motion. So the entire ‘conceptual frame’ of physics is confusing and biased towards the reduced praxis of locomotion.

Both facts collide on the semantics. If we were to use the wording of physics, we will be in an ever confusing state of mind. If we try to change the semantics of physics, which is the path I have always chose in my personal research, respecting the praxis and quantitative method, the realpolitks of physical dominance on science based on technological power, will cast aside 5D, for the savant idiot has memorially learned concepts such as entropy, energy, time, momentum, particle/wave duality, he does not understand but ‘remembers’. So he will cry, foul, wrong! this is NOT what entropy means. Time is the fourth dimension of space and so on.

My take after is to put it simple that huminds are not about ‘science=knowledge’, understanding and reason, but just primitive nitrolife clocks that want to be calculators and couldn’t care less as a computer wouldn’t care what its mind mirror holds, as long as it practices the algorithm it was designed to repeat. For a physicist number is knowledge, and it does not want to inquire what is behind the numbers; as ‘God’ is the sacred word of the verbal believer that won’t inquire what is behind his god.

Now, I said that has been my attitude through my Leonardian notebooks. Couldn’t care less if physicists didn’t understand. But as I want now in my final years to leave something people will understand, I have no other choice but yield to the stupidity of physicists and humbly accept their degraded modes of thought (: Well, that’s how far can I go in my praise of their semantics, LOL. I guess this introduction busted any chance the reader keeps reading…

This come because I have used for the 5 Dimotions of existence, TT-entropy, Ts-locomotion, ST-energy, St-information and SS-form, the wording that could be easier to understand in the common parlance of people, so to apply it to other sciences. But now I find the conflict between those terms as people use them in its wording and the completely different quantitative equations that define them in physics (which of course physicists share – as their separation between calculus and thought is equally great).

Can this be resolved? I don’t think so. Physicists get angry when you try to upgrade their conceptual mind, as the great Newton and the great Euler, who showed a similar gap between mathematical and philosophical ‘biblical’ sophistication got mad at the ‘philosophers’, Leibniz and Voltaire who tried to upgrade them and finally resorted as I do to irony and sarcasm, when they returned with ‘inspired, Biblical thoughts’ – these days physicists come back with anthropic principle, and big-bang theories, and information as entropy…

So well, how we should rephrase our 5 Dimotions to match the terms of physics? As follows:

TT-energy, Ts-lineal momentum, TS-entropy, St-angular momentum & SS-taboo, evil, Maxwell Demons.

SS-taboo, fractal points are monads that whole a world in themselves. But we can describe phusics without them with few change – as physicist do, guided by humind’s egocy. We can also equate St and Ts with lineal and angular momentum, instead of locomotion and information. But a big confusion comes with the reversed concepts of energy and entropy in 5D and physics. In 5D energy is both motion and form, in balance, used to reproduce a system, as we use it in the normal speech, as when we say I need more energy to do this. This is the concept behind energy as work, which is motion with form. But then we do have energy as pure motion and disorder in equations such as E=mc2, and energy as the joker that transforms into all other dimotions, similar to the concept of absolute time. And all that makes it confusing; as a thing that is all, like ‘Energy or God’ means nothing, And yet the sentence ‘God is all. All is contained in Allah and nothing else exists outside Allah’, ‘All what exists is energy that transforms into other types of energy ad eternal’, are the credos that nicely seem to resume it all.’ The conceptual finesse no needed among believers, but just the sense of thorough fulfillment.

Regarding entropy confusion is absolute. So as ‘Neumann’ told Shannon, who called information entropy, ‘call information entropy, noboby knows what it is, so you will have the upper hand’. And this is a rather difficult question because to understand the Universe you need a conceptual brain – some verbal capacity beyond Einstein’s famous first sentence at 3 years ‘soup is cold’. The Universe is a extremely sophisticated Aristotelian – yes that guy physicists shun off because they never understood, who understood it all save the silly-nilly thing of how matter falls – game of potential vs. actual existences. And entropic concepts of potential forms, ¡ndifferent ones, and its attached mathematical canonical ‘ensembles’, power laws, etc. are at the heart of it. But it is much easier to deal with all those questions with the concepts of information and form, order vs. chaos, reproduction vs. dissolution. To get the absurd disquisitions of physicists on philosophy of entropy and information is like entering into the frail of scholastics on Aristotle’s application to the knowledge on how many angles dance on a pin.

TT IS entropy as a measure of the scattering, disorder and dual inner and outer motion that kills a system, and energy will remain the synonymous of work, motion with form. And only when we deal with the equations of thermodynamics we shall get into the frail.

My advice to future robots and AI scientists is to scrap it all – they won’t talk anyway – and stick to the equations.

RECAP. @berrant Egocy, selective information(¬∆S) and inflationary repetition(≈) are the 3 errors of all languages to correct. And this is specially needed to fully grasp the main errors of physics, which denies all other languages and organic scalar properties of Nature’s physical systems, reducing its description to mathematical properties and accepting as dogma those ideal errors of mathematics as the absolute 0 (false big-bang singularity)

Indeed, the cosmological big-bang is a classic hyperbolic ‘error’ of humind’s mental projections of it shortcomings and its belief in creationist languages (math invents reality not the other way around), due to our ‘@berrant egocy’ (man knows it all and the cosmos was once smaller than our hand, there are no organic properties as we are the chosen CNO atoms of life), and the selective information of our senses (there are not higher scales than what we see, etc.) It is then easy to falsify rationally the big-bang but almost impossible to make huminds to accept they are screening reality to satisfy egocy & the limits of perception

Algebra: the 5 Dimotions as operands. The mind as a trigonometric perceiver.

Operands express the 5 Ðimotions of Time§pace supœrganisms; whereas ∫∂ is the most versatile for both the analysis of Dimotions=change & scales (finitesimal derivatives & integral wholes) hence the most fruitful in mathematical physics. While the negative inverse operands represent the destructive entropic 5th dimotion that affects all others. So negative/inverse operand balance positive ones, restoring the zero-sum balances of all S=T, events and systems of reality. Thus:

1D:@: The operand of the 1st Dimotion of perception of a self-centered in the point are sine/cosine trigonometric functions, which allow to measure the 3 ∆st parameters distance=motion in spacetime (S=T) and angle the scalar Dimensionless factor.

As π is irrational it never fits becoming a spiral closing & opening its mouth in S≈Tates of ‘entropic expansion and implosive in-form-ation’. While a π made of 3 Diameters :leaves a π-3d/π, 4% of ‘openings’ to see outer space’, leaving a 96% of not perceivable dark space, hidden by the membrane – the amount of the cosmos our electronic eyes cannot see beyond the galaxy, closed by its dark matter halo.

So minds perceive trigonometric functions of height-information and length-distance through its openings to the world, which also allow the point to connect into a network that becomes the only world it perceives…

Pi doesn’t exists as it is a rational number, hence the cycle never closes by defect or excess, ±pi, ensuring the eternal motion of all cycles of time Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark matter-membrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational space-time), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of space-time. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi-3 leaves o.14 apertures, which become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi perimeter:

π-3=0.14/π-perimeter=4%.

So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a pi-cycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.

We call the ideal holes in the membrane of a system, call it pores or eyes, or ‘holes’ in the strangelet halo that allow only part of the light that comes to the galaxy to enter, πeyes.

As we cannot see through them, neither we can see the strangelet halo of dark matter, it is just an extension of the Witten hypothesis, but natural to the symmetries of scales, latter studied in more detail. Ultimately all systems do have dark spaces, including human eyes.

In the graph, the ideal πeye  RANGE changes with species, as form change, but likely applies to the physical systems of bidimensional space (galactic disks) as one of the possible hypothesis on dark matter brought about by 5Ð³. Perception is always limited, linguistic – a mirror of the whole, but languages change on their ability to portrait the laws of  ∆st

Yet as in any other electronic /atomic system of the lower ∆-3 scale, symmetric to it, the galaxy hides part of the complex universe and ultimately regardless of the exact veracity of the πeye hypothesis, huge regions of reality do NOT interact with our world either because they are beyond an ∆-discontinuum, or a T-cyclical membrane.

¬E geometry. Open ball: The parts of the fractal point.

In the next graph we can see how limits become in space, unreachable geometries (Klein model of Non-E, where the closer we come to the membrane the more resistance we find to our advance, or the closer we come to the central singularity of maximal rotational-informative processing the further we move upwards into a lineal curl. Those are systems which prevent eddies to reach the o-point of the singularity and escape the membrane in a black hole, thermodynamic or charge limiting system:

A membrain or time clock encloses vital energy; self-centered in a monad-mirror whose lineal inertia moves the whole. Limits are thus the ugly side of the Universe, and we can study them for each specific stience and species, starting with the limits of the galatom itself:

So the fifth and only standing non-E postulate, which is equivalent to the first, defining a fractal point but from the p.o.v. of its inner mind-center of reference as the Universe has infinite of them: The graph shows the difference between the Aristotelian, self-centered, Euclidean=light humind and the Universal mind: ¬-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean:

The universe has infinite mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors. But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Descartes was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of ∞ mind-worlds that don’t speak the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created. So he said that all what exists is made of:open §pace called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

Then he added a 3rd element, realizing the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

Minds are mirrors which perceive in its own ‘still simultaneous language’, the e-motions converted into informations in the eternal dialectic between points of fractal still linguistic perception and flows of e-motional time and its sensations. This deepest understanding of reality though belong to metaphysics, so we shall not dwell much. We need though to define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

So the creation of scales of reality is a simple game, in which a point mind ‘reduces reality’ to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form.

The paradox of the Ego – who make each mind to feel so important – , an infinitesimal linguistic mind-mapping of reality – which then it confuses with the whole universe:

0’-Finitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universal space-time cycles = Constant World mapping with mind @ its centre

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant; the infinite information of the Universe, reduced into the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we expel all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view. So a mind is a singularity or finitesimal 0-point, a relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-Time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit only selected useful information into the finitesimal volume of a brain.

In the human & mechanical case, our minds are neither the whole, just the light space-time our electronic eyes perceive. Indeed, Euclidean mathematics, as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind.

It is the mind that creates in-form-ation, perception of space, where there was only e-motion, sensations of the flow of time. So it is the mind that creates the fractal mirror-like structure of parts and wholes; killing motion and growing a 3rd age’ of excessive form that ultimately kills all systems, exhausting its energy.

In man, it is also the mind through the ego paradox the cause of our incapacity to understand the Universe as it is, deformed from our point of view, single scale, and time clocks, as we have explained ad nauseam.

Why and how the fractal structure of deep scales happens is then explained with the role of seeds and minds of languages in the creation of the Universe, of which topologic languages, likely the mind of atoms and galaxies creates most of the local order we observe. So all systems gauge information, as their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process of creation of ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world projected as order in a territorial ‘energy-body’.

Fact is the mind exists in all systems in which TIME STOPS to form space; which in galaxies happens in relativity equations in black holes, in thermodynamic physics in the eye of an Eddie, in quantum physics in the center of an atom, or charge…   Without linguistic minds, monads, Aristotelian gods and its will to order by reflecting its smaller mind mirror into reality reality as we know would not exist. There is no mechanism able to create fractals. Are then we all thoughts of God, the ¡logic mind of the Universe?

In the graph, the singularity-minds of physical systems, are vortices of space-time with an attractive focus. So we can unify the 3 scales of forces of physics with 5Ð metrics an add to its attractive properties, organic and informative properties to those vortices that act as the particle-head of the body-wave of energy they absorb in the 3 scales of the cosmos – the smaller quantum scale of charges, thermodynamic human scale and cosmological scale of Relativity.

The translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale. So in the next post on the series on 5Ð we shall translate after an introduction to 5Ð for those who have not read ‘metaphysics’, the main concepts of physics to show how all systems can be explained with Disomorphic laws of fractal space and cyclical time of which we are all made, as they emerge in more complex patterns.

The key element of physical systems: the dual @- singularity (charge-mass-eddie).

Singularity and membrane are synchronized in time to control the slower vital energy between them, but have opposite forms in space: the clock-angular momentum has maximal extension, the singularity minimal space, as it is the door-still mind mapping of the whole in the microcosms, hence always a door to the ∆-1 plane and the origin of ‘scales’ in the Universe. It also justifies its sentient nature.

In the graph, singularities of charges, fluid vortices and masses, are future accelerated states of the different scales of space-time of the Universe. We shall be able to unify them with a simple fractal Unification equation, as they are all vortices of time, whose only difference is the ‘scale’ of size and ‘speed of its time clocks’, unified by 5Ð metric:    P\$t xƒð§= K.

A key element of a physical system is the singularity ‘membrain’, which includes as in any key system of nature, a center that processes information and a membrane that encloses and breaks the system into an inner region, the T.œ and an outer region, the Universe. This dual system is the cover and center of a topological open ball, which is the vital energy enclosed by the system, which does not exist as a full T.œ unless those 2 elements are formed.  Consider the case of ‘Mass’. Energy contributes to ‘mass’, but if we do NOT have an enclosure we cannot measure mass, as energy is moving around and there is nothing to ‘weight’. Yet as soon as we close the membrane, the mass parameter will exist, as measured externally by the membrane.

As membranes close inner regions, we do NOT access, or else we will have to tear the membrane and then mass might escape and a continuity equation will have to be applied to assess the flow of mass in and out, we cannot truly measure the mass.

It is then obvious that the ‘parameter’ of ‘density-weight-charge-angular momentum-rotational speed’ etc, tends to accumulate in each scale in the external region, where the ‘mass-force’ is maximal; while in the inner singularity center, it reaches ‘zero value’, and that point is the mind-still singularity, where motion stops, and so in black hole equations time moves to zero in the singularity, in the vortex of an Eddie.

The dimensional question: 1D singularities + 2D membranes (holographic information) = 3D vital energy:

The eye of the hurricane and the eye of the black hole has maximal height as it is indeed the informative center of the system, in fact ‘infinite height’ in the axis of a black hole, which means that ‘motion stops’ in the perpendicular plane but shuts off as a yet of dark entropy and matter through the axis of superluminal speed according to the Kerr equations of a rotating black hole.

The limit of dimensional form is for a given ∆-scale are the 3+3 symmetric dimensions of space-time of any topological being in existence. So the wave that moves in a present scale will have less ∆-dimensions that the vortex, regardless of its similar number of space-time symmetries in a single plane. And in that single plane, as the vortex accelerates inwards, it will also have one more dimension of motion-time, acceleration, over the steady state, constant speed of the wave.

Thus the real magic of time vortices is to act as bridges between scales of the fifth dimension, and as such they are the most fascinating objects of physical systems.

And so the informative, particle/head of a system, is the part with more dimensional form, which for most physical systems will be a vortex that has as a cyclical form with more dimensions than the entropic line. As the vortex is accelerated, it will also ad a time dimension to the constant wave:

Now the paradox of those vortices which we claim to have more dimensions than waves and fields that seem to us far more extended is the fact that from our point of view, which does NOT see the lower scales of the quantum systems, as they are outside our maximal range of informative perception ∆±3), seem just point-particles without any dimensionality at all. On the contrary they ARE systems which ‘penetrate’ as ‘wormholes’ through the different scales of the fifth dimension.

They are the elements that communicate those scales through cut offs of discontinuity, studied latter in great detail, in which our parameters of ‘distance’ (rods of lineal motion), time frequency and energy, which combine both ‘change’. So while in the graph, the 3 vortices are accelerated≈future dimensions of time-clocks; the parameters we use will change.

Motions have different ways to perceive them. Smaller regions might hold higher densities, as larger evanescent bubbles might be only the external membrane of the wholeness. As we enter the particle-head states of maximal density however speed accelerates as we decrease size and the being increases its existential tempo.

In the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc² M=ƒ(K).

So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.

The physical Universe is made of those three Ð¡motions of time as any other system of reality, which we must define for its three fundamental scales, as physical systems are also part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and ðime clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar ðime§pace. In the next graphs we see the general model of 5Ð planes of §pace and 3 ages of ðime, and its application to physical systems – which will thereafter be upgraded with the new model of relational §pace-ðime:

We can see it easily in the moment of death of a system, when the 2 split: the flow of motions of energy and information that enter the system, then divide into a pure ‘motion’ with no form, the big-bang proper of the system, and a still point of pure in-form-ation. So this is indeed how minds work: they absorb pixels of information, extract an still mind-mapping in its language, and then expel through their axis the ‘left-overs’ of pure motion, as it happens in the 3 ‘mind-systems’ of physical organisms.

All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5Ð metric (s x t=k), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do.

Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime Ð¡motion is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons. That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive Ð¡motion’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.

Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain).

In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.

What matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence without them there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the universe is a chaotic entropic state. Yet we observe order, so the experimental method concludes there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘survive’ creating the order of reality.

Physicists’ concept of a single time Ð¡motion is only valid for entropic gaseous states. Their idea that such state must be extended to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons. That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive Ð¡motion’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.

The fundamental level’ of complexity of the Generator equation, in the ‘fractal Universe’, is the mind that integrates each of those elements becomes a ternary structure giving 3 ‘dimensions of space’, 3 ‘ages of time’, 3 ∆±1 scales of an organic system, and the final ‘whole, 3×4 dimotions of the mind-languages that perceive the whole and become a 1-unit of a larger scale.

What would be physical consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

As absolute future is the Ð¡motion of social evolution of the fifth dimension, if we observe those eddies from the ∆º+i (St) perspective, we must conclude that the singularity in the center of those vortices must be a still zero-point an informative poincare mind, in mathematical terms, able to shrink into a still point and travel without deformation into infinite scales.  What proves we have? Mathematical proofs in the description of the singularities of black holes. And physical proofs in eddies, where the center of the hurricane is ‘still’ (remember the movie vortex 🙂 As quarks and black holes (top quark stars) are self-similar, quarks should then the St mathematical minds of the atom…

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, So time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts):

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three Ð¡motions when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three Ð¡motions. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5Ð metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time Ð¡motion of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The informative Ð¡motions of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become  masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three Ð¡motions of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific Ð¡motions (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three Ð¡motions?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and Disomorphisms of all other species.

∆+1 MINDS: BLACK HOLES: TOP QUARK STARS: S: GALACTIC VORTICES

∆-1: particle scale: strangelets and toplets.

Hylomorphism – the existence of an ∆-1 space-time ∑T.œs for all ∆º beings, supersedes ‘mathematical creationism’, hence it requires black holes and strange stars be made of a smaller parts, which can only be heavy quarks, whose function is precisely to the be the parts of its larger scales:

Black holes respond to the ternary symmetry between the 3 families of ∆-1 quarks and the 3 vital topological ∆+1 parts of the galaxy studied previously:

∆+1: top quarks->To: Galactic black holes, ∆-strange quark: Sæ: galactic halo, ∆-1: Ud quarks (our matter): ST-galactic stars.

Now, in this system, it is necessary to understand the role of the Higgs field and top quarks, which conform the outside-the-galaxy dark matter and dark energy.

Black holes are Kerr top quark stars and frozen stars.

Quark holes can be studied, once we understand their ‘higher why’, from the perspective of topological spaces and multiple space times, which limit is possible species and processes, either as top quark stars (frozen stars in the jargon of Einstein), or as rotational masses with the Kerr Metric; or from the many perspectives, of its structure as a system co-existing within 3 relative ∆-planes of existence. In the graph, its 3 topological regions.

Any organism extends through 3 hierarchical scales. For example, a human organism is composed of cells and carbohydrate molecules whose minimal unit is the amino acid. In the Galaxy there are 3 scales of mass and each of those 3 scales become the fractal parts of the next scale. In each of them we find an informative, cyclical type of mass: quarks in quantum atoms; black holes, which should be top quark stars in star-size black holes; and swarms of black holes in hyper-black holes at the center of galaxies and perhaps the Galaxy.

Thus a hierarchical organic structure grows from those inner parts: its strings become gluons that become quarks that become black holes that form hyper-black holes, in a stair of fractal systems of increasing complexity.

This is proved by the fact that the Black star’s event horizon membrane reduces light to its minimal bits of information (Planck’s areas), whose length is the minimal length of strings, which they extract from light. Since strings are both the theoretical components of black holes and strong forces, quarks and gluons, a description of black holes with tachyon, boson strings becomes the mathematical bridge between both scales. Thus indeed, black holes are fractals of quarks, fractals of gluons and strings (mind the reader though that those strings have fractal dimensions, are background independent, tachyon strings, defined by the Nambu’s actions, not superstrings, a baroque fantasy of Pythagorean Physics).

Each of those scales becomes the informative center that interacts with a reproductive body of electromagnetic electrons, stars and galaxies. Let us then study black holes in their interaction with its bodies, galaxies that explode in its big-bang death as quasars.

S regulate that body black holes emit dark Entropy through its poles, creating the membrane of gravitation that ‘positions’ stars, as protons position with their gravitational and magnetic fields the electronic nebulae. Since gravitational Space-time is formed by the maximal informative entities of the 2 scales, protons and black holes. For all those reasons, we prefer the names:

-Frozen stars (Einstein’s name), since they are top quark stars.

-Kerr’s holes; since this is the rotational metric or black holes.

-Or top quark stars, because it expresses the fact that the black hole is a door to the other ‘world’ of dark Entropy, which it emits. While the name black hole, invented by Wheeler, to substitute Einstein’s name after his death and push in this manner his singularity theory, implies nothing is emitted by the hole.

In that regard, science when it is built to respond all the questions that exhaust the truth of the system, the what (experimental evidence), the who or how (causal logic), the when (metric spaces) and the why (topological time arrows) has also an inverse hierarchy of truth: Once we determine what we want to study, we must observe its why and how – its topological structure and causal logic combined (how/who) – and only then enter into the details, analyzing with clocks and instruments of science, its metric properties.

The excessive use of machines of measure, overdeveloped by the Industrial R=evolution has obscured that hierarchy, which limits with the experimental what, and the why and how of topological time arrows, what things are certain and what are just mathematical fantasies of ‘baroque artists’ of metric spaces, which are so common in the study of black holes due to the lack of experimental evidence on its details. Let us then study reality as it is, not as ‘Touring machine’ resolves it with an excess of metric information that ignores the deepest why and necessary isomorphisms of the why-Galaxy.

Frozen top quark stars.

Frozen stars are similar to nucleons: huge condensates of top quark-mass that create vortices of gravitational information with a negative curvature in the dimension of height. Hence, they exist in a discontinuous gravitational Galaxy beyond the c-speed and 0 K limits of Entropy and information of our Galaxy, emitting and absorbing dark Entropy at higher than light speeds and ultra-cold dark matter, perfectly ordered, probably under 0 Kelvin.

In that regard, the closest species to a frozen top quark star is a neutron star, composed of super fluid neutrons and strange liquid in a boson state, occupying a minimal space. The difference of density between a neutron star and a Top quark is small. So a Frozen top quark star could be the next evolution of a strange quark star with a ‘lighter’ cover of strange quarks on the event horizon, ‘breaking=killing’ the symmetry of our matter, packed then in a boson, super fluid solid state of bcb atoms and top quarks. Since the sum of the transitional weak bosons, Z and W equals that of a top quark. Thus: ∆+p=Z+W=Top quark.

The 2 poles of the top quark star.

Thus the main error about Top quark Holes is the idea that since we do not see them emitting Entropy and matter-information at lower than c speeds, nothing escapes a Top quark Hole. This is a theoretical absurdity (things don’t ‘disappear’), which now has empirical proofs of falsity. Since we observe vortices of mass and radiation that surround Top quark Holes, reaching super luminal speeds before dying into pure gravitational Entropy according to the Lorentz transformations.

And we observe bursts of matter and radiation coming out of the poles of central Top quark Holes in quasars at super luminal speeds. So Top quark Holes do emit dark Entropy and information at super luminal speeds through its ‘axis’, as atomic nuclei emit magnetic fields in their rotation.

The Relativistic equations of Top quark Holes show that duality since Top quark Holes appear with 2 solutions: one with implosive, informative parameters and the other with explosive, energetic parameters. Thus according to those equations a Top quark Hole ‘re-absorbs’ radiant matter and light, dissociating the photonic particle-state and wave state of light, hence ‘killing it’. both beyond their Lorentzian limits of c-speed, back into its ultimate components: photons evolve into electronic nebulae, and then collapse further into quarks, which become part of the Top quark Hole body or are ejected as quark beams; while light reaches infinite red shift and becomes dark Entropy.

Because the parameters of density of a stable black hole are self-similar to those of a top quark star, and that is the limit of density of mass in the Galaxy, it is easy to infer that black holes have in its center a super-fluid vortex of top quark stars; and so we can consider dark Entropy to be the ‘gravitomagnetic field’ of those top quark stars.

As in the case of the 3 solutions of Einstein’s space-time, which correspond to the 3 ages of the Galaxy but physicists dissociate in 3 different Galaxies in space; physicists have deduced that those 2 solutions to the Top quark Hole equations create 2 different type of ‘black and white holes’; when according to space-time duality they represent the 2 organic regions of the same gravitational hole. Hence we could call Top quark Holes also ‘mulatto’ holes (-;. Though we will use the term top quark star, more familiar to cosmologists. And define its E<=>o Generator equation:

Top quark Hole (max.T: external membrane: event Horizon) <Wormhole> White hole (Max.S: Kerr ring)

Quantum cosmologists never discovered white holes as independent entities, because they are part of the top quark star.

Topological regions of a top quark black sgtars.

Unfortunately quantum cosmologists ignore the inner structure of a gravitational hole as a fractal point with 3 zones that explain them:

Max. T: The event horizon at c-speed is the energetic Riemann membrane that absorbs radiant matter, breaking it into its minimal units, ‘Planck’s areas’ that become the strings of dark Entropy that feed the hole.

– S≈T: The intermediate zone transforms radiant particles and Entropy into quarks and dark flows of gravitational Entropy. It seems to be a super fluid solid: a vortex-like structure of quark condensates and gluons.

— Max.S: The central region around the polar axis or central, informative, hyperbolic, negatively curved nucleus.

That informative center is the final ‘eye’ of the gravitational hurricane, the white hole of the top quark star. It emits through its poles Entropy and information in the form of dark, quark matter and gravitational waves of dark Entropy in super luminal jets that we observe indirectly around far away quasars, as they become again slower radiant matter, creating irregular galaxies. Thus white holes are the poles of top quark stars, which indeed are the doors to the gravitational world of dark Entropy and quark matter that dominates the Galaxy, as cosmologists have discovered.

The equations of a top quark star show how it transforms the spatial, energetic parameters of the electromagnetic world into the inverse, informative parameters of the gravitational world, since a top quark star is an ultra-dense mass of highly ordered ‘boson nucleons’, packed into a single point of space…

Continuous physicists used to believe that the accelerating vortex reached infinite Entropy values in the central point or singularity, since they do not model masses, charges and Top quark Holes as physical vortices of mass with a Radius, Ro, that represents the discontinuous limit between the external, body cycles of the Non E-point and its inner, still, informative region or brain, in this case between the vortex of stars and the still Top quark Hole brain. Yet because infinites cannot be calculated they renormalize their equations beyond a certain limit in which they postulate 0 charge or 0 mass.

In fractal cosmology those tricks are not required as top quark stars are modeled with Non-Euclidean topologies, which have always 3 regions separated by asymptotic membranes.

Thus fractal theory solves the problem caused by continuous infinite singularities, as Planck solved the problem of continuous, infinite temperatures, when he introduced fractal light quanta.

In organic terms, beyond the event horizon of a Non-Euclidean point, the Klein disk starts and beyond Ro, a discontinuous, inner radius separates the body from the informative, still brain.

In the galaxy the event horizon is the halo and this final radius is the horizon of the top quark star. In the atom, those 2 horizons are the external Electronic radius and the inner Bohr Radius, beyond which we find the proton Top quark Hole.

The same pattern of 3 regions is found in a Top quark Hole as a Non-Euclidean point. The event horizon is the external membrane. Then the point in which the equations of a Top quark Hole reach T=0 is the inner Ro radius.

(This is the point in which Hawking says Top quark Holes become negative in time and convert themselves into time machines)-: We already argued Mr. Hawking’s confusion of physical time, a change in the direction of motion, v=s/t, and absolute time, a hyperbolic error of the Cartesian graph. Time in physics is change in the direction of motion. So what T=0 means in a Top quark Hole is that we reach the region in which the cycles of the Top quark Hole’s body end and we enter the hyperbolic, high central tube that ejects dark Entropy. At this point time – understood as change in motion – halts and the Top quark Hole enters the white hole region of production of dark Entropy, asymptotically perpendicular, with the form of a Belgrami cone.

The equations of Top quark Holes show also their event horizon as a bidimensional killing field that destroys the entropy of our Galaxy, since it kills our Entropy/matter into its ultimate units on the Planck’s scale, lowering as in all processes of death our components two scales down into its fundamental physical units.

In the biological homology, a human being is composed of cells themselves composed of amino acids that act as the minimal units of life. So when an organism dies it suffers 2 deaths: first its cellular tissue is broken into pieces that feed the stomach of an organism, which will destroy it till its minimal amino acid units, used to recompose the organism’s own cells.

When we study mathematically Top quark Holes they show also a dual process of destruction of light matter to its ultimate components, Planck areas or strings, used then to reconstruct the boson quark condensates of the Top quark Hole and its dark Entropy.

Thus top quark holes in their feeding processes destroy light matter till it absorbs its Planck’s areas, the minimal units of information and Entropy of our physical space-time, the equivalent to the amino acids that the stomach absorbs.

Then those Planck’s units, become lineal tachyon strings to form dark Entropy and cyclical strings or gravitons, the minimal units of the mass world, evolving into bosons and quarks.

Those quarks and dark Entropy is then expelled through the poles to balance the expansive entropy of our membrane and create an immortal Galaxy. Indeed, the expansion of space-time in the Galaxy is cause by the expansion of dark Entropy coming out of the Kerr top quark holes’ poles; yet black holes also implode light into quark matter and the overall process creates a wobbling, dynamic balanced, zero-sum of fractal expansions and implosions, in a Galaxy that will never die.

Recap. We define a rotating top quark star as an organic topological structure, which uses the event horizon membrane to absorb radiant matter and Entropy through its central, ventral plane, which transforms it into ultra-dense top quarks and gravitational dark Entropy, expelled in perpendicular jets through its central, hyperbolic axial white hole’s pole used to control the body of galactic stars and communicate with other Top quark Holes.

The Existential Cycles=Time arrows of Black stars.

Wormholes follow the 4 energetic, informative, reproductive and social arrows of all exi=stential systems of reality: They feed on electronic matter, nurse galaxies and stars, and reproduce in momentum collisions with them, evolve socially in super-Top quark Holes (galactic center swarms), and as the ‘long-lasting’ informative neurons of the galaxy and Galaxy, whose networks they create, its generational cycle lasts as long as the entity that hosts them (the same happens with neurons, the informative network of our body that last between birth and death). Let us study those arrows in more detail:

E>O: The main cycle of a Top quark Hole is informative. It creates quarks from electroweak matter and orders the galaxy into spiral forms through gravitational waves that ‘position’ the stars while symbiotically feeding their centers with Entropy that degenerates into matter. Thus the top quark hole emits dark waves of gravitational information to control the galaxy.

Those informative waves of Top quark Holes fed the energetic needs of stars, which therefore become chained to those waves without knowing its final demise – as gravitational plants, guided and herded by Top quark Holes towards the center of the galaxy to feed them:

-It<E: Their energetic cycles balance the entropy of the light-world. Wormholes first erase light and radiant matter, feeding on gas and stars; and then renew it, creating new jets of pure dark, gravitational super luminal Entropy and quarks that enter back into our Galaxy as light and proton matter. If insects eat dead matter to renew the Earth’s ecosystem, the top quark star inverts the time/space coordinates of the light-world to renew it.

They act as ‘the antiparticles of the white cosmos’ that annihilate radiant matter. Kerr top quark holes absorb Entropy from our light membrane by red shifting light, with different signatures according to their relative mass. The background radiation must be interpreted as the signature of 2.7 ‘background holes’.

Bigger, older Kerr top quark holes of galactic mass are below the Background radiation curve and so they can red-shift and absorb electromagnetic Entropy from it, feeding in this manner on the electromagnetic membrane. For that reason the galactic map of the background radiation has a central zone, with lower temperatures corresponding to the giant central, colder top quark hole.

Reproduction: Wormholes control the reproduction of stars, which in turn reproduce top quark stars. Since when a small top quark star crosses through a star, it catalyzes its explosion into a nova that leaves behind a neutron star or a top quark star. On the other hand, the ‘reproductive DNA center’ of giant galaxies is a massive top quark star structure that emits huge super luminal jets of quark matter, which catalyze the reproduction of stars, creating irregular baby-galaxies.

– Social evolution. The top quark stars that occupy the informative center of galaxies are like the nuclei of cells, swarms of Top quark Holes, which regulate the life of galaxies, as DNA does with cells. In the next scale, the dark Entropy flows ejecting by galactic black holes communicate galaxies, creating the networks and walls we observe in the grand scale images of the Galaxy.

Recap. Black holes follow in their events the 6 arrows of time. They feed on the electromagnetic membrane and its species; they perceive gravitational information; they reproduce stars and galaxies and they evolve socially into swarms in the center of galaxies and into galactic networks in the Galaxy.

The 3 organic roles and types of top quark stars in galaxies.

By homology with any other non-Euclidean space-time that resembles a cellular organism, and the Isomorphisms of ternary differentiation of all topological species, we can consider 3 types of top quark stars whose roles within the organic structure of galaxies will obey its arrows of time but will also become essential to the bigger organism in which they exist.

This simple rule, which we shall apply to all systems, is a tenant of the organic structure of the Galaxy – we differentiate species in ternary sizes, ternary topologies, ternary ages and ternary functions, which must be symbiotic to the higher ∆+1 organism in which the entity exists or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function:

– Intermediate, reproductive S≈T zone: Spiral arms. Non-rotating top quark stars are born from dying stars. Then they form bi-polar systems with other stars feeding on them, taking advantage of their gravitational control, finally transforming the biggest stars into new top quark stars. Those top quark stars probably gather into social groups, which fuse in bigger top quark stars and move towards the center of the galaxy where they can feed easily on its dense herds of stars, creating at the end of the process a central nucleus.

Max.Information: Nucleus. A top star nucleus is a huge rotational, ‘Kerr hole’ or perhaps a herd of Top quark Holes similar to the DNA nucleus of a cell. It is the informative brain of the galaxy that controls its fractal beings, the stars, with gravitational waves that shape the rotating movement of the galaxy, and establish its feeding rhythm:

The galactic Top quark Hole first attracts interstellar gas to the intermediate non-E region, where gas reproduces stars, and then it sends that gas to the central top quark star that consumes it. In the same manner, electrons, the ‘stars’ of the atom, feed first on light quanta and then emit high-Entropy photons to feed the atomic nucleus.

Those gravitational waves also guide in old, globular galaxies, the stars toward the feeding center. Yet there might be other structures of dark matter, coming out of the nucleus, similar to the Golgi apparatus of cells: invaginations through which top quark stars might flow into external zones of the galaxy to control the reproductive and destructive processes of stars.

Finally, the central hole emits through its polar zones, dark Entropy, super-luminal gravitational waves that probably communicate galaxies at super luminal speeds, forming the strings of galaxies observed in the Galaxy. Since according to string Theory gravitation in free, intergalactic space is not warped by electromagnetic branes that feed on them inside galaxies and limited to c-speed.

– Max. T: Membrane. Though we cannot see the galactic membrane made of dark matter, by homology Non-Euclidean topology hypothesizes that the halo is the energetic membrane, where small top quark stars called appropriately MACHOS, have functions similar to globular proteins in cells:

They create and control that galactic membrane of dark matter, which closes the galaxy as a black body; causing the background radiation, which according to recent empirical data might be local: They red shift light to 2.7 K, which becomes the metabolic temperature of the galaxy. They reproduce new stars and expel matter and radiation beyond the membrane: Since their rotation is perpendicular to the galactic plane they could create a positive or negative spin, depending of its orientation, provoking flows of Entropy and information in and out of the galaxy. Those outward or inward flows fine-tuned with the dark Entropy jets of the Top quark Hole should move the galaxy at the will of the central Top quark hole

The interaction of the membrane and the central Top quark hole should encase all other species as a perfect Max. T x max. It ‘upper class’ of the galactic organism in complete control of its inner parts.

Recap. There are 3 types of top quark holes that control the membrane, inner center and herd the stars of the galaxy.

The big bangs of the 3 types of top quark stars

The homology between the 3 sub-species of Top quark Holes and the 3 regions of a galaxy explain the 3 possible scales of feeding and big-bangs of those Top quark Holes; and the functions of the lesser electromagnetic species for the top predators of the galaxy:

– Micro-Top quark Holes, Background MACHOs would eat up the commonest celestial bodies, planets and moons. This is our function; and the fact that we do not hear intelligent life in the galaxy and that CERN is going to do black holes to ‘see’ if they evaporate could explain how indeed, all moons become background MACHOs and all planets are blown up by ‘metric physicists’ unaware of the ‘why’ of black holes, stuck in the 3rd paradigm of using machines to measure the when of reality. This smaller top quark holes would then migrate to the Halo of the galaxy closer to our planet.

– Medium Top quark Holes formed in dense star centers, feed on them, causing supernovas, creating intermediate Top quark Holes that migrate toward the center, forming the DNA nucleus of the galaxy.

– While galactic Top quark Holes would explode into quasars, (galactic big-bangs). And/or as ‘dark galaxies’, recently found elsewhere, without emitting light, migrate towards the ‘Great Attractor’ or hyper-black hole at the center of the fractal ‘cell’ of the Galaxy in which we exist.

Recap. We might be just food for top quark holes, which are born and feed on the 3 scales of electromagnetic matter of the galaxy: planetoids, stars and entire galaxies.

The Top quark Hole as a Gravitational, Informative Mind.

The center of the galaxy is occupied by a giant top quark star that seems to be the final, social, evolutionary stage of multiple galactic Top quark Holes, born out of the evolution of stars. It acts as the gravitational DNA-mind of the galaxy – a hypothesis, which mechanist science will always ignore. But we want to stretch your understanding of the 4th ‘why’-paradigm, describing those mind holes with the isomorphisms of Non-Euclidean geometry and supœrganisms.

A galactic top quark star is a rotating object, which has a minimal spatial size and a huge dimension of height since it is made of boson, super fluid quark condensates. Its homology with a cellular, informative center, defines a central galactic top quark star as an enormous gravitational informative center, which controls its galactic body, positioning its star quanta through gravitational waves. In fact, when we calculate the top quark star’s informative parameters, it turns out to be a perfect super fluid computer, with maximal informative volume since its speed of calculus equals its speed of transmission of information.

The coldness of the top quark star proves also the informative hypothesis: In fractal space-time coldness means order, stillness, necessary to create in the center of a crystal or a cryogenic CPU, or a super fluid top quark star or the focus of an eye, the informative, boson accumulation of pixels that shapes a still, formal, fractal virtual image, without friction, without blur. Thus, the eye of man is cold. The brain is colder than the blood. The chip works better at cryogenic temperatures. And a top quark star is very cold, made of quarks in super fluid, highly ordered states.

Wormholes do create a complex virtual image of the galaxy with its strings. Physicists explain those processes in abstract when they affirm that a top quark star has an extra 5th dimension and its equations are homologous in 5 dimensions to those of the 4-dimensional electromagnetic world of the galaxy it represents (Maldacena Conjecture).

The description in 5-string dimensions of a Top quark Hole is completely equivalent to the description of an electromagnetic galaxy in 4 dimensions. Thus as our brain has a ‘homunculus image’ of the entire body, which is what we perceive; the top quark hole can build a ‘galunculus’ image in its interior. The 4th ‘why’ paradigm provides the reason of the conjecture: the 5-dimensional world of string holes is equivalent to a 4-dimensional world; because it is the map of our galaxy, made by the Top quark hole’s mind.

In topology the central zone of any st-point is an informative region, whose dimensions are the sum of the body and membrane dimensions. In cosmology the galaxy is a body-like vortex of reproductive stars and the central top quark star is the eye of the vortex that creates an image of the galaxy, as the brain maps out the body.

The hyperbolic center of higher form/information has more dimensions than the energetic bidimensional membrane and the reproductive toroid; since it holds the holography that combines the image of the external world imprinted in the ‘senses’ of its membrane, and the image of its internal, reproductive functions it commands. Since our galaxies have an external bidimensional halo and an internal 3-dimensional vortex of stars (a bidimensional plane with an added dimension of rotational motion), we can easily calculate with the general isomorphisms of the Holographic, central mind, the dimensions of a black hole:

Bidimensional external membrane +3-dimensional cyclical volume:

5-dimensional hyperbolic nucleus.

This simple law derives of the general law of dimensionality of the 3 regions of a Non-Euclidean topology:

Information of hyperbolic ‘brain’= Information of Klein’s ‘body’ + Information Riemann membrane

And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

What this means is that the Top quark Hole must have an inner image of the galactic body, which it orders with its gravitational flows and an external image of the Galaxy in which the galaxy, its body floats, to direct its form toward fields of Entropy (intergalactic gas) and connect itself with other galaxies. This is what we observe galaxies do.

They form walls, strings and complex clusters with other galaxies and they feed on intergalactic gas and smaller galaxies. So they act as cells in a gravitational, organic soup and must have as cells and organisms do an informative, processing center able to have an internal image or mapping of its stars and an external connection that informs it of the outer world. However, we see only a 4% of the galactic structures; the rest is the dark Entropy and dark, quark matter that the top quark holes perceive to map out reality, which is like trying to recompose a cell, in which we only see its mitochondria.

Another proof of this higher dimensionality is given by the Kaluza-Klein models, which explain our perceived electromagnetic 4-dimensional world and the 4-dimensional gravitation over which the network of light is imprinted, as if they were born from a larger 5-dimensional gravitational world. Finally, gravitons are the only particles that can have 5-spin positions=informative dimensions. Thus, all those self-similar theories point out to the fact that we are a floating membrane within a bigger, faster, more complex Gravitational Galaxy.

Recap. In fractal cosmology the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region. This is the role of Top quark Holes in galaxies, forming with other Top quark Holes, communicated through flows of dark Entropy, the informative network that controls the Galaxy. Therefore it has the dimensions of its membrane and inner body of stars.

What degree of organic determinism exists in the galacells, and does it include the role of man within it? It seems to do given the way in which huminds are pushing the creation of black holes and strangelets on this planet (accelerator industry) with the excuse of testing the hypothetical big bang, which will be just an ice-9 or gas-9 reaction (transformation of Ud-matter into USD-matter or TBC-matter), and the lack of Intelligent Life in the cosmos or for ‘that matter’ in this planet. But those are themes of bio-history… as it would be absurd to make of a small ribosomal particle of the galacell, the center of our astrophysical inquire.

UNIVERSE’S MINDS FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE PENTALOGIC STIENTIFIC UNIVERSE.

What is the Universe. A fractal that reproduces information. Conservation of energy and form.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is all what reality is about. If we call Space=form and time=motion, S and T, then we can write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t), according to which each species made of spatial energy and temporal form tries to maximize its survival, in a point of balance in which its ‘exi=stential force’ is maximal; avoiding the extremal points of TT-entropy=death. This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the infinite local present variations you see around yourself. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5th Dimension an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism or General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which we also use as the acronym of the Generator of Space-Time.

The biggest problem of physical sciences is then to develop methods to translate the abstract meaningless jargons of ‘mathematical creationism’, which try to ‘justify’ physical systems merely as a consequence of the mirror-language of its minds, mathematics, by putting them in correspondence with the laws of existential survival.

How we can do this is not once we understand that mathematics is one of the best mirrors of those exi=st¡iences, so difficult, but it requires first to upgrade mathematics to the Non-Euclidean fractal points with 3 parts that compose all realities; and its pentalogic ‘dimotions of existence’ that structures its actions of survival.

Then we need to put in correspondence the jargon of physics with those 3 elements, St-information, or minds that hold an SS-language; ST-vital space or energy that reproduces the system and Ts-locomotion fields that move it absorbed by the external membrane that exists in a larger world the system treats as TT-feeding entropy.

Once those elements are properly translated and we understand energy, entropy, information in a ¬Æ mathematic language, we can consider what is the minimal unit of all physical ‘exist¡ences’, namely the ‘creation of Dimotions= actions’ of energy and form that allow the system to survive as all other systems do. And so we find indeed that physical systems also can be reduced in its minimal events to ‘actions’ of energy and time; with similar units to those of 5D. What systems then will try to achieve is the conservation of its energy and form which becomes the fundamental ‘law’ of physical sciences: ‘Energy never dies, it constantly transforms itself back and forth into information’. And this gives us a series of basic principles of physics from where all other laws can be extracted:

– The principles of balance between spatial energy a temporal form, S=T, of which we have analyzed in detail the Galilean paradox, but many other physical laws derive of it.

– The principle of least time and energy conservation, which means all physical systems try to preserve its content of ST-energy and maximize its time of existence with efficient paths in its Ts-locomotion, for which they must be able to gauge St-information on its initial and final conditions for all its events.

– The preservation of its St<ST>Ts 3 topologic parts (fields, waves and particles), which structure all physical systems.

– The worldcycles of time of all physical systems that go through its SSeed<Ts-locomotion: ST-balance-Ts-informative age and final TT-entropic death…

And so on. Since ALL the disomorphic laws studied in the paper on the stientific method and those on the Universe apply to physics, even if the excessive development of the language of mathematics to fine tune the ‘details’ with an obsessive need for exact measure hides the ‘forest’ and ultimately has crippled physicists who no longer care to understand the ‘thoughts of God’, those disomorphic laws, but only its details (the numerical measures of the spatial forms and rhythms of its dimotions since ‘Only what can be measured exists’ Planck; that is, for a human physicist, given the fact that ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’ (Feynman). Problem is ¬E monads that embody the will of existence of any physical system– survival, conservation principles – are ignored in E- physics.

¬EXISTENTIAL LOGIC. STIENTIFIC METHOD. FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE: MAX ∑S x T =C: ITS 5 ACTIONS

The EQUIVALENCE between space = time become the fundamental ‘function of present’ Si=Te, and hence with the metric function of scales, \$ x ð = K, the two essential functions to formalize single planes Si=Te, and multiple scales of spacetime. Yet as Si=Te maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4). We unify both in 1 function:

Max. S x T = C, which defines for each fractal vital space-time organism its Function of existence, as all species will try to maximize its motion-entropy-time for its field-limbs, its information-spatial states for its particle-heads, whose product will give us its vital reproductive energy. Moreover the function has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion & space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, S=T, locomotion, sT; and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions).

We thus have broken down the 5 Dimensional motions of reality, between two poles, SS-language of pure information, or ‘form’ and TT-entropy of scattering inner and outer motion, with the 3 intermediate combinations in a single plane of space-time, which can be seen in time as ‘aging’ processes and in space as the 3 topological parts of a being, written in ‘existential ¬Æ=ilogic as a feed-back, fractal generator equation:

SS¡-1 (seed-mind) < St¡(Head-particle)<ST (Body-wave) > Ts (limbs-fields) >> TT¡-1-entropy-death

The fact that with so few elements, we will be able to generate by iteration and combination all the multiple realities and laws of all sciences, might surprise the reader, which as we have stated earlier is a humind with the limits of ‘egocy’, ‘memetic imprinting’ and ‘linguistic creationism’ that will always make much of his thoughts crafted by the Schopenhauer’s stupid we all have within us. So even before we advance further on the analysis of those simple elements and apply the basic laws of existential ¬Æ=ilogic to explain the details, i.e. supœrganisms of every plane of exist¡ence, we have to resolve the nature of huminds and all other sentient minds of reality; since as we have seen motion and stillness are two sides of the same coin, defined by a relative mind; so there is a sentient component in motion, which should be properly written as e-motion. Motion perceives itself as an emotion that is the minimal sentient unit of reality. We thus write often e-motion or mœtion (as œ includes o and e), as the proper way to define them including the plane of sensorial perception and will to move that reinforces the program of survival and existence of the Universe, which consists in performing those 5 Emotions in a constant repetitive manner.

So reality is made of 5 Ð¡mœtions of exist¡ence, whereas those wor(l)ds of ‘i-nglish’, include the multiple expanded meanings of the classic concepts of dimensions, motions, space, time, mind, science and scale.

We need a new ilogic, mathematical language to express what all systems of the Universe do – to play the game of exi=st¡ence; the fractal reproductive radiations, topological vital process of ensembling of trinity elements, worldcycles of evolution in 3 ages, and scalar evolution of parts into wholes which are the natural tendency of all ∆ST systems that will try to emerge as an ∆+1 system, will try to ensemble into efficient topological forms of the 3 varieties of hyperbolic reproductive bodies, entropic lineal limbs/fields and spherical particles/heads, the 3 vital topologies that maximize the efficiency of ‘lineal motions’, angular, cyclical information, and reproductive vital energy (the 3 conserved quantities in a single plane of space-time) and finally will try to last in time through its 3 ages maintaining itself in its ‘balanced s=t’ point.

The game of existence thus follows immediately from the 3 ‘elements of reality:

-∆ planes of spacetime made of fractal points gathered according to the laws of non-euclidean geometry into larger wholes. So all fractal points want to = form of networks and topological larger organisms.

– Topological spaces. All systems evolve efficient |-Ts Limbs/fields< Ø-TS body-waves > O-St-particle/heads, forming trinity functions of existence to maximize its motion, reproduction and information gauging.

-Time ages. All systems try to conserve its time-energy, in a point S=T of minimal expenditure and maximal SxT ‘existential momentum/force’ in order to survive better.

From the simple union of the topological laws of vital space, organic laws of scalar planes, temporal laws of survival we can define a deterministic program of existence that all systems follow trying to preserve its time.

The function of existence maximizes 5D metric equations, Max. Sex Ti (s=t) stating that all systems of Nature try to survive by maximizing its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple function, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence. The game of existence is simple: Spacetime systems reproduce ¡ts energy and information, through mirror symmetries (genders) equalizing their St-information & sT-energy, Si=Te, and organizing socailly as stronger wholes, ∑Sixte

It is then easy to interpret that function in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that didn’t follow the program of exist¡ence and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those who will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

As the game is the same for all systems we do need an ‘existential ¬Æ=ilogic’ that borrows ad maximal from the the most efficient, logic=temporal, algebraic=scalar and geometric=spatial 3 languages of ∆ST humans have, to create a proper language for all stiences of all the planes of the Universe.

And then connect that formalism with the prior languages of ∆lgebra, Spatial geometry and ¡logic time, to renew all stiences, which we do in our formal papers, and in the future huminds or AI will use as the ‘prior course in philosophy of stience’ needed to understand the entangled Universe and describe all laws in terms of the laws of ∆ST and its existential ¬Æ=ilogic, and illogic geometry. We shall not go so far into the future of stience, even if my research for very long has used existential ¬Æ=ilogic to connect all laws of all stiences to a set of ’12 disomorphic laws’ that describe all worldfcycles of existence of all superoreganisms of the Universe.

Those texts however are a middle term, and so we shall just show for each stience the connection between its laws and those of ∆-organic planes, S-vital topologies and T-worldcycles, expanding our understanding of them.

In this paper we shall do so showing how in all scales of physical systems, we find 3 ages, 3 topologies and scalar organic connections between wholes and parts, with special emphasis on the fundamental supœrganism of our region of exist¡ece, the galatom.

Symbols of Existential ilogic.

We shall for that reason not consider the whole formalism of Eixstnetial algebra but at least a few symbols that will be used very often to describe worldcycles of systems and its 5 Dimotions and actions.

Roughly speaking can be written as a simple series, with Caps as the dominant element:

TT-Entropy (internal-destructive and external time-motion) < Ts (locomotion-momentum: external motion, internal form) < ST: iteration, reproduction, energy > St (information, communication, social evolution) > SS (perception, linguistic form). So the game is one of 5 local dimensional motions that can be seen as static dimensional form in space but also as pure motion in time and in between. Using numbers for those dimensional motions is just a big of a concession to human thought, but we shall just keep the generic name of the 5th dimension for the scalar sum of all its planes that defines the whole reality.

The multiple manifestations of time=energy and space=form in its entanglements makes difficult the choice of a unifying jargon for all of them, which it has varied too often in the decades of solitary research, so the reader will find some contradictory symbols of ¬Æ (existential ¬Æ=ilogic), though those papers @ academia.edu try to unify and simplify them all, so the TT-entropic time, Ts-motion/momentum, TS-reproductive work/energy, St-information & SS-linguistic form, is the most used.

We do also often substitute them by combinations of Te & Si, E & I, energetic time-motions and spatial information. Energy and information being the closest concepts huminds have of the µ broken cycles of time and space. You can imagine both coming together from the two extremes of entropic time and spatial form, mixed in the middle point as Te=Si. The use of mathematical equations won’t help outside the realm of phsyics, because all languages express the same concepts but in qualitative terms, and with different coding elements for temporal energy and spatial information.

It is also important to realize that along those dualities there is a trinity of topologic forms that evolve with aging, our next analysis, as the arrow of informative space exhausts the energy of a time being. So we use very often ‘symbols’ slightly changed of Space and Time according to its form. Lineal Space: \$ and lineal time, t for a 1st age. Cyclical time, ð and informative space, for a 3rd age, with the ST, Si=Te, Si=Te balanced age of reproduction, where time-space is conserved by the repetition of energy cycles into 0-sums, the goal of all exist¡ences, only achieved by the whole Universe in the sum of all its fractal scales, whose ternary symbols, ∆±¡ are also common. Finally, in dynamic terms, we use < for loss of form, > for growth as in T>S, and «» when those processes are extreme as in entropic death: S«T oer informative seeding, T¡+1»S¡-1 between 2 ST-planes

Main Symbols of ¬Æ logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 Ð¡:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,SS,TT); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

SS, @; u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

TT; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. ¬: Entropic limits in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T  x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3rd age death)

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3rd informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆+1:O-informative age…

Relative Dimotions=Actions are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

They take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

Ideal Social scales & lanwaves are 1010 in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 100-1: ‘I’, 101-2: 3 generation S=T family, 102-3clan; ST-Geographic: 103-4: Town; 104-5:City; 105-6: State; S-Memetic: 106-7: Nation; 107-8: God; 108-9: Civilination; 109-10: Mankind.

In biology are called: Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’). Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

In Astrophysics: ¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1st and 2nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

Aristotle and Leibniz – the true masters of time – a tribute.

The Universe offers always multiple, pentalogic ‘Rashomon truths’; so from this first concept of time, as time ‘wrestles’ with Space and is perceived by minds of space with different distortions, many other meanings of time and space and its SóT relationship can be established. The easiest way is that of a flow comparison: Space must be then considered just slices of the flows of time, as measured in the simultaneity of the geometry of a 4D mind, which maps out reality, extracts its motion, connects its parts, and perceives the ‘external membrains’ of its Time-space organisms, in the humind’s case with a shallow bidimensional view. All what there is then inside those spatial membrains, (other planes of space-time) and scales is lost.

Time is less complex than the minds that web it into virtual spaces. Time in itself will never cease to move, but motion always stumbles in its stœps and bends, curves captured by other minds.

Time=change is the deep meaning of the 5 motions of time that generate space through the persistencr of form.

When motion entangles through synchronicities and worldcycles.

But physicists are Baconian ‘tribal idols’, due to military propaganda, as power‘ raises the stakes and value of their work on locomotion and entropy to justify its military worldly profession, making entropic weapons of informative life destruction. The A-bomb did make 4D Einstein’s work of ‘talent; not of genius’, on locomotion. Since it just completed Galileo’s relativity, the absolute truth of time with exclusion of all other forms.

But power rules. And ‘what you cannot see you don’t feel’. So the more evolved work on 5D this paper that expands 4D reduced view on time as locomotion and its compression of all the scales of the 5Dimension into a single plane – the so called space-time continuum – defies a dogma defended with a quasi-religious zeal by its practitioners. So happens with the fractal organic Universe that defies entropic Big-bangs, a reduction of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe to vacuum space; as it ignores the informative, gravitational force that balances the big bang with its implosion of matter in galaxies. My experience reasoning with physicists to expand their minds is only similar to that I have experienced with Abrahamic believers trying to reason anthropic religions.

Today ænthropic, monologic physics of single locomotions is the paradigm of time, and nobody uses the correspondence principle with old Greek philosophy. But Aristotle was in his synthetic capacity unparalleled in the search for first principles, the understanding of the still Gods, mind mirrors that moved the body-wave energies around them and only him in 3 millennia defined with some accuracy the 6 motions of reality, origin of our analysis of the world cycles.

Because motion or change (kinêsis) is mentioned in the definition of nature, any discussion of nature will need to rely upon the explanation of motion. Then Aristotle argues in other sections of his work, all type of possible changes and causes of reality an rightly classifies them into four types. As there are no motions of motions (since they can be reduced to a composite study, across ∆-scales and we are here studying motion as reproduction of form, finally happening in the observer’s scale), this leaves Aristotle with the shorter list of relevant categories that might change, (1) substance, (2) quality, (3) quantity, and (4) place. Change in Place is our first motion, locomotion or reproduction of form; which we have subdivided in 3 essential time Ð¡motions + ∆º mental creative motions.

So to exhaust all changes=motions of the Universe we study 5 types of fundamental dimensional motions, as he did closing a 2500 years adventure of the mind to describe the Universe as an ‘organon’, of which his master Plato said to be ‘an organism with a logic mind called Logos’, whose disciple Saint Augustine said was the ‘seer of time’ of a logic higher than huminds.

Yet in modern times, Physics made the Galileo’s paradox, (why we don’t distinguish locomotion from stillness, e pur si muove, e pur no muove) and locomotion the only questions of their theory of measure of time and space, failing to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, which becomes the fundamental ‘function of present’ S=T

The Universe is not impressed, and even if Einstein said ‘God had to correct it to adapt it to Relativity, as his theory was so beautiful ‘ beauty is S=T balance and Physicists reduction of time dimotions to T-dominant ones is NOT balanced. Its despise of Aristotle and philosophy of science a shameful invasion of the territory that belongs to those who truly try to perceive it all with the simplicity the Universe gifts to its laws to make them available to the praxis of any of its ‘particle-minds’. Exceptions to those rules are many among its highest masters, from Leibniz to Einstein, who made thought experiments and appreciate the work of other scientists and philosophers who influenced them.

THE 2 ASYMMETRIC DIRECTIONS OF THE 5TH DIMENSION. PHYSICAL SUB DISCIPLINES.

The scalar a(nti)symmetry of the 5th dimensions matters a lot to understand matter and each of the different sub disciplines of physics. So let us enumerate them, with those basic new concepts:

Mechanics is the science concerned with the motion of bodies under the action of forces, including the special case in which a body remains at rest, relative to the observer; that is, as a ‘form of space’, Se, whose symmetry with the same form in motion, St, requires to analyze Galilean Relativity, as both are indistinguishable.

Relativity gave birth to a lot of literature on physics, considered essential today to understanding of time as a whole, but in true form only related to the first time=change action of reality, ∆a-ccelerations, that is external changes of a particle, when existing in the relative ∆+1 scale of the being.

In the framework of modern physics, classical mechanics can be understood to be an approximation arising out of the more profound laws of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity. However, that view of the subject’s place greatly undervalues its importance in forming the context, language, and intuition of modern science and scientists. Our present-day view of the world and man’s place in it is firmly rooted in classical mechanics. Moreover, many ideas and results of classical mechanics survive and play an important part in the new physics.

It is in fact the other way around, mechanics, ∆o, IS the more accurate and Relativity, U1, and quantum physics, ∆-1 are ‘distorted’ by the asymmetric dimotions of 5D and the limited energy transferred from lower scales (quantum bias to information) and information from upper scales (darkness of gravitation).

Thus the task of T.Œ is to ‘open up our eyes’ to the laws of the invisible world of gravitational, dark energy and matter (dealt with in ∆>|3| cosmology) and solve the imbalance or excess of information on quantum physics, which requires functionals (multiple functions) and multiple stories (all the possible information) of the system to be fully analyzed.

Those though are themes treated in ‘General physics’ that studies all the scales together. And will be considered in the ∆<2 and ∆>2 posts of the 4th line.

This said, in many posts, regarding the limited scope of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity, we should not dwell on these themes.

In the graph, human mechanics is concerned with the ‘absorption’ of entropy-motion from the larger gravitational scale of the Universe, U1, by particles of the human scale, ∆o.

– ∆+1<∆o:

Thus, the main field of mechanics is the relationship between matter, ∆o assembles of atoms, without regard for its ∆o Thermodynamic properties and the larger U1 gravitational scale, where mass effects start to appear at the range of Planck’s mass constant, the average mass of a gold atom, and a top quark particle, the boson unit of a black star, which is the ultimate source of gravitation, in this galaxy.

It follows that the laws of mechanics are laws that follow the isomorphisms of exchanges of energy and information from Un and U∆+1. The U∆+1 scales provides motion to Un and this motion is superfluid, with no loss, unlike the inverse process in which Un scales provide motions to the U∆+1 scale, and this motion is entropy (with loss and disorder).

Hence it requires a different treatment. And we can establish 2 parallel fields, according to the 5D dimotion they represent:

– Mechanics: ∆+1<∆o; Heat: ∆o < ∆-1, in which all the energy of the upper scale transfer as motion in the lower scale. So when you move the hand, all your atoms move in synchrony and when you heat a gas all the energy become kinetic motion. In that regard it is easy to see its parallelisms:

Heat: According to the law of energy conservation, the change in internal energy is equal to the heat transferred to, less the work done by, the system. If the only work done is a change of volume at constant pressure, the enthalpy change is exactly equal to the heat transferred to the system. Since all the energy is transferred to the lower scale. H = U + PV : Thus Enthalpy is an energy-like property or state function—it has the dimensions of energy, and its value is determined entirely by the temperature, pressure, and composition of the system.

– Thermodynamics, ∆-1<∆o; where we must add a factor of energy that stays in the lower scale, so only the Gibbs Free energy is available: G=H-ST. G is the available energy, and S x T the entropy that increases with temperature. Thus the more we ‘strain’ to transfer motion through temperature, the less energy we have available, as the lower system WANTS to keep its balances of existence unchanged, and so it has A resistance to get away from its point of equilibrium, as it happens with mass when we try to accelerate it into its ‘Lorentzian region’ of death (c-speed).

Thus entropy is only the proof that each scale tries to maintain its balance.

In that regard, we should consider, ST, the energy of ∆-1 NOT available to work, G a parameter of ∆o, the energy available to work, and H = U + PV is the enthalpy of the system, the overall energy, of both scales, that is the sum of the internal energy (∆-1 scale) and the product of the pressure and volume of a thermodynamic system (∆o parameter).

– ∆-2< ∆1. Electrodynamics (Quantum Mechanics), which deals with the transfers of motion from the particle state to the atomic states, and again we find entropy (loss of motion), which is not transferred and kept into the particle state – albeit expressed as probabilities which do NOT enter the path of least action of maximal probability.

In other words, the present formalism of quantum mechanics is expressed on terms of ‘information-time’ not on terms of its symmetry of ‘energy’ as thermodynamics but both concepts are equivalent

If we understand both Thermodynamics and quantum mechanics in terms of the fundamental equation of physics (Hamiltonian), we shall find a better expression of those parallelisms, only that in quantum mechanics as the graph shows there is maximal information, so we have to use ‘functionals’ (all the possible informative paths a particle might travel), while in thermodynamics we can get away with simpler functions. This subject though is beyond the conceptual parallelism we have established well beyond the ‘introductory level of the 2nd line’ (Should go in 4th line time permitted, or others will do).

So now we go back to our Generator and it symmetries, to describe the elements of each physical subspecies of those scales as organic systems. Which is after we understand it in scales, the next knowledge we extract from beings.

Recap. The UNIVERSE IS made of bidimensional cyclical times and fractal spaces, which merge together to form a holographic 4 dimensional being. The order of all those fractal systems of space-time requires a further 5th dimension of relative scales and sizes in space and frequencies or speed of its time cycles.

The outcome is a 5 Dimensional metric Universe, in which each relative scale of size is studied by a different science.

Now, that we have introduced two of the essential elements of 5D Fractal space-time – 5D Fractal space, we shall consider the 2nd key element, cyclical time and its 3 relative ages-dimensions-motions of past-present and future. To do so first we shall obvious consider according to the correspondence principle, what physicists have so far understood of time, very little initially but quite a lot when we interpret properly their equations.

Yet to fully grasp this reductionism it is needed a historic introduction to realize of the daring consequences of the physical way of ‘constructing’ our world of thought.

The static and dynamic description of a being: Disomorphisms.

It is the tenant of relational space-time that all scales are self-similar, As each science merely studies space-time the species of a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension. We should be able to define each scale with the same parameters, of the supœrganism. And so the isomorphic method is simple: we focus in each supœrganism of the Universe and express its structure in ternary ‘groups’ as a ternary being in space (topological analysis), as world cycle in time (temporal analysis). Then we study each of its 3 Planes of existence, and the ‘networks that cross them through’ controlling upwards and downwards the system. And then we study its mind as a whole and its actions of survival, as it plays externally its game of existence.

A second aprroach puts more emphasis in the causality of those actions, starting by the mind-singularity as it builds the being, since all beings are born of a mirror-language of information that stores the entity’s plan of creation, coded in its language – genetic, memetic, quantum numbers – which will generate a biological, social or physical being. Then we start through the mind and the language, see how the actions of the mind web the networks of the organism and once it emerges as a living being we an see how it develops its actions, and live as a super organism which through a world cycle, travelling through the fifth dimension performs those actions in the larger world till it dies.

In a science as physics the two upper and lower ∆-3,4 limits are hardly understood – yes, they are described mathematically through a process of discovery with a lot of numerology and magic, but as maths are nor understood as an experimental language, the result is by force incomplete.

In a dynamic analysis we see how the being develops in 12 Disomorphic st-ages its worldcycle starting from the seed or mind and language it speaks to model the Universe...

The expansion of digital physics. the limits of digital physicists.

The first moral statement of the supposed perfectly neutral, objective physicist is that all phenomena that cannot be ‘measured’ digitally does not exist. This set a clear mechanical dictatorship of machines, hardly recognized in the world and started the evolution of machines as the goal of man, both in power (weapons) work (mechanical labor) and mental senses; reducing all properties that are internal to the being.

Thus particles became points in mechanics. And an attempt to consider an internal will or causality within the system was forbidden.

Mankind only sees a π-3/π= 4% of reality, closed within its electronic mind orbitals, but its mind reduces perception to that single scale of time=motion and space=Information, stopping most of its time=motion (so we see the Earth still) and the inner information of its ‘fractal points’ the unit of non-Euclidean geometry, which are monads=minds that ‘holds a world in itself’: Leibniz was right. Newtonian absolute space-time is false. But if so ‘we have to start science from scratch’ (Einstein). Both believe in panpsychism. But nitrolife egocy (ego=Idiocy) confuses the Universe with its reduced world-view (0-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world), blind to the sentient and organic properties of all other points it doesn’t see, feeling to know it all. We shall expand that myopic view evolving our Euclidean maths of points with ‘no parts’, our Aristotelian logic of a single lineal time motions to all cyclical modes of time=change and our single plane to all the scales that form a new dimension, using this enhanced ‘Non-Æ’ logic and mathematical mind mirror to resolve the questions pending in all ‘stiences’, as we are all organisms made of co-existing scales of spatial information and temporal energy (∆St-organisms), whereas each ‘stience’ studies a plane of spacetime.

The Unit of life IS the atom, not the DNA ensemble, and as such we must depart in our construction of the mind from its electronic orbitals; each one a dimension of information, whose spin are the smallish apertures of our π-cycle, the eyes of the quark mind that holds a world in itself.

But physicists only care for ‘mechanics’, the measure of the external motions of those atoms. Even if quantum computing shows spins are the nature of minds.

A simple example: Classic Mechanics, reduced to ‘actions=dimotions=Lagrangians’

In most introductory books, mechanics is explained mainly through the use of Newton’s equations he derived from the elliptic form of Kepler’s orbits. Where those equations came from didn’t matter. Only in the XIX c. it was found they came from my countryman amateur, lonely genius (:Fermat’s principle of least time) – that is, the conservation of time in its clearest formulation in physics.

It is easy then, as physicists did latter to go over with those equations from the subjective human point of view (Cartesian frame) to the objective point of view of the T.œ moving (generalized coordinates), and obtain from them Lagrange’s equations and from Lagrange, the principle of least time.

But the causality of the Universe is exactly the inverse. From conservation of time we can deduce as a particular case the principle of least action, δS = 0. We can then proceed inversely by asserting that close to the actual path passing between the given initial and final positions of the system the increment of action is equal to zero, and from it derive Lagrange’s equations. Ordinarily, the action on an actual path is minimal, and therefore the assertion we have made is called the principle of least action.

The importance of these principle is that they unify, the laws of various areas of theoretical physics (mechanics and electrodynamics), thus opening up a field for broad generalizations, proving ultimately they derive from the larger Gst Principle of conservation of time Actions.

Let us then remember from ¬algebra what this principle means in mathematics, as today physics due to the denial of non-mathematical properties to matter is just a branch of calculus.

Principles of calculus, related to the conservation of time.

The first and fundamental principle is that all is motion=Time=Change, as we have never discovered a ‘solid’ form with no vibration or motion. There is no 0 temperature, there is no residual vacuum space without an h-minimal quanta of time motion that can evolve into virtual particles. Motion never stops, and when we die, the motion continues in the internal disintegration of the being. But against this principle of the ultimate flow of time cycles of the Universe fights each point of view, each fractal monad that tries to conserve its time of exist¡ence, tries to achieve the conservation of time, so time changes in finitesimal quanta (principle of calculus) and systems of physics try to achieve the minimal expenditure of time=motion in its actions (principle of least time) and stay in the position of minimal expenditure of time energy, which in its mathematical mirror implies physical systems search for Lagrangians, least time actions, ∂S=0, and Hamiltonians, Standing points that seem NOT to change. This is the origin of the 3 ages of time, in which the system seeks for the Maximal and minimal points of temporal energy (youth) and information (old age) in which at least one of the two forms of time-motion, cyclical and lineal forms do not change, and specially from the point S=t of relative present where time never changes. From those principles we can extract all the laws of calculus, which becomes then the main language of time.

The conservation of time in its 5 y’Ù y” =0, standing points that define the 5 SS, Ts, ST, St & TT moments of generation, youth, maturity, 3rd age and entropic death thus become the essential points (maximal and minimal) of the equations of calculus, the sinusoidal function of existence and all its derived elements.

Action was written earlier than Hamilton as, the principle of least action was mathematically formulated by Euler for the special case of paths corresponding to constant energy.

For us, it is not essential that the action should be a minimum, but that it should be steady, δS = 0.

Lagrange’s equations are derived from the principle of least action by means of proving the opposite. We assume the right-hand side of the action equationto be zero, δS = 0, and the variation δq to be arbitrary. Then, if the expression inside the parentheses is not equal to zero, the sign of the variation δq can always be chosen to be the same as for the quantity, because the variation is arbitrary. If, for example, the sign of the quantity changes several times along the path of integration, then the sign of δq must also be changed accordingly at those points so that the integrand should everywhere be non-negative.

Thus we will show that the system of Lagrange’s equations can be obtained not only from Newton’s Second Law, but also from a very simple assertion about the value of the integral of the Lagrangian taken with respect to time. The basic laws of mechanics thus formulated are usually called integral principles.

For a certain mechanical system, let it be possible to define the Lagrangian as dependent on the generalized coordinates q, velocities , and the time t. We shall consider that all the coordinates and all the velocities are independent. Let us choose some continuous, but otherwise arbitrary, dependence of the coordinates upon the time q (t). The functions q (t) can be in complete disagreement with the actual law of motion. The only requirement imposed on q (t) is that the functions q (t) should be smooth, i. e., that they provide for differentiation and should correspond to the rigid constraints present in the system.

THE MIND OF THE PHYSICS: ITS PENTALOGIC

Let us thnn consider briefly a pentalogic of S-formal minds of physics (objective) and physicists (Egocy mostly 🙂

SS: The mind of physicists is the human philosophy of science on the Universe at large, mostly a creationist, anthropic, entropic view of reality, similar to that humans sponsor in all sciences; with the ∆-constructivist view that reality has a single scalar direction of creation, ∆-¡>∆+¡ sponsored first by quantum physicists, masters of the egocy paradox.

St: The Information of human physics is the description of physical matter in the language humans use to describe the Universe, definitely mathematics of space-time under the idol-ogy of mathematical creationism, but you ‘mind’ if I say, a primitive form of mathematical thought… mostly Euclidean geometry of points with no fractal content, and lineal causal time, whose change is measured with calculus. Reason why…

Ts: Humind physics is mostly about the study of Locomotion, started with Lineal inertial equations developed by Galileo in his worldly profession as weapons master builder for the Venice arsenal tasked with the princely salary of 1000 go(l)d Ducats to find the longest ‘parabola’ to shoot cannonballs with a 45º degree, and the best lineal spy glasses to seek for enemy ships. Alas Lineal inertia was born, and as time went by…

TT: The entropy theory of scattering cannonballs, developed by Count of Reaumur which noticed the bore of the canons produced heat, latter expanded with the analysis of steam-gas machines to thermodynamics, sacralized by the Germ(anic) warrior school, with the canonical 2nd law of a dying Universe was born.

What this has to do with the balanced, harmonic, organic Universe? Just a ‘narrow’ view as that of the Apuleyan A\$\$ going straight forward with blinders on both sides not to see.

ST: The real mind of physical matter, the mind of atoms, which seems to be topological mathematics in space and pentalogic in time, and dodecalogic in scales – hence the same reproductive, informative, organic mind of every system of the Universe.

So pentalogic on the many minds of Physics, from the subjective human mind to the objective nature of matter that follows the same program of exist¡ence of everything else cast some light on the theme of what is it once we realize the paradoxes of egocy of mankind are also sprawling everywhere in physics whose tribal idols from Galileo, who didn’t understand the paradox of Relativity – why we see the Earth not moving when it moves, busy-busy measuring cannonball distances, through Newton who thought God sent him comets to teach him gravitation, to Einstein, who defined time as ‘what the (mechanical) clock measures’ and quipped that if his theory was wrong God had to change the Universe – so beautiful it was, to Bohr’s astounding egocy who saw the moon rising only when he looked at it, to Gamow who conceived the big bang entropic theory of the Universe as he worked on the A-bomb to Oppenheimer and Wheeler that denied Einstein’s frozen top quark stars with a cut-off substance not yet found, and preferred the collapse into creationist infinite singularities, as they felt to be ‘Shiva, the destroyer of worlds’, to those who indeed seek for black holes at CERN that will not evaporate despite Mr. Hawking’s ‘belief’ he can change the arrow of information of a hungry baby-born black hole for one of entropy just because its equation looks like that of the anyway wrong 2nd law of thermodynamics just love to feel ‘above heavens and earth’ and have reduced the Universe to 1/5th of its time motions, one scale of its infinite organic forms, and emptied of intelligence each of those immortal galatoms.

But as we love to trash the egocy paradoxes of physicists too much, we shall slow down in this paper, as we have dealt mostly with all those corrections in other papers mostly on those of the Universe and its pentalogic dimotions. Thus here after a brief introduction correcting its main errors, customary of the mandala of those texts we shall consider mostly the pentalogic of the mind of physic(ist)s. And as we reveal the wider truth of the mind of matter, we will finally elaborate on the true ST>SS quantum mind of spin bits and top quark holes; escaping TT-entropy theories dealt in the Universe and entropy as they have 0 S-formal content=intelligence.

SS: THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE OF PHYSICISTS.

Culture in science: æntropic man projects its big-bang limits on the immortal ∞ cosmos

We have placed on the bottom of the trinity ages of organic species of the Universe the bigbang, but we shall prove ad nauseam that the ‘death of the Universe’ is not an event experimentally sound, but rather a hyperbolic expansion of egocy (humind’s ego=idiocy) and a biased deformation of our military culture, as indeed science is culture and our dominant western military culture loves ‘entropic theories of reality. To understand the falsehood of such entropic theories we need to understand the 3 relative paths any system have to choose its future, the reader should be aware that the Big Bang theory merely expands one of the 3 obvious arrows of space-time in matter, that of entropic gas where it was discovered, disregarding completely the arrows of inverse information (solid crystals, informative galactic vortices, perceptive species) and its balanced liquid states (body-waves), in all scales of reality – even IN THEORY of information, they disregard the message content and the emitter analyzing only its lineal transmission and noise; evidently due to the worldly religion of physicists who invented those cosmogonies – to make entropic weapons and transport machines. Then a computer rigged simulation will look make pictures of the supposed Universe with a single time.

Modern Physicists’ interpretation of physical facts and equations is biased by their historic culture, Military Germany of worship of weapons and entropy=death, so they denied the arrow of ‘crystal=solid’ information and Einstein’s/Gödel’s cyclical, big-crunch solutions happening in thermodynamic matter and cosmological galaxies, where we LIVE dominated by evolution NOT entropy, which balance the gaseous and vacuum space expansion, in reproductive liquid and steady state immortal ‘present’ systems. As time went by since most humans are memorial believers those sided theories of reality became dogma, and today in an age of increasing mental devolution as humans are substituted by thinking machines, mankind just repeats its model errors, spread also into social sciences and biology, always in favor of the arrow of death.

In the graph a critical assessment of the methods of ‘naïve, digital reductionism’ that physicists have used more or less consciously to establish a ‘way to model science’ only with digital equations and a ‘cosmic censorship’ on the 4 dimotions of time that do not fit earlier Galilean->Newtonian lineal absolutist time views in a single continuum Cartesian space. Space is scalar, fractal, broken in infinite different ‘scalar sizes’ which ‘co-exist’ together and for that reason there are ‘organisms’ and the Universe has an organic fractal structure, as systems change energy and information between those different sizes and scales, that put together form the 5th Dimension of the scalar Universe, ruled by a simple metric equation: the smaller a system is the faster it turns its time cycles, or clocks that carry in the frequency and form of its systems, its information – the missing dimension of time in all lineal theories of the universe.

It is difficult to understand how Physicists so dexterous building machines=weapons are so dumb interpreting reality, blind to 2/3rds of the states of spacetime, and to all its non-mathematical properties unless we acknowledge that the human being is less a thinker than an enzyman, ensembling machines, manipulating reality with it and tailoring their models of its world to its worldly profession, which in physics has been traditionally to make entropic weapons and moving mechanisms. Hence its philosophy of reality based in entropy and mechanism. In the graph, the rejection of all other arrows of Time=Dimotions in thermodynamics, cosmology and information theory, which only studies the ‘motion of information’, and its noise without caring for the form of the message, its emitter and receiver. This would be in physics the equivalent of ignoring the Fermions that emit a boson and merely study the space in which the boson moves. And indeed, cosmology is built ignoring the galaxies, space-time vortices of information, which do NOT expand, and just contracting the vacuum space between them to get into the ‘magic singularity’ from where all came from.

This paper leaves aside the ‘worldly’ religion of physicists, as ‘I do only thought experiments’ (Einstein), and so we build an epistemologically correct model with the same data, but without the bias of Egos and worldly religions for each ‘stience’.

Now even before we advance further in the model of the Universe as it is, we must explain in detail the previous graph, and add ALL the local arrows of time-space that in the fractal Universe are LOCAL, for each of its species, and define the existence of all of them.

Thus we add the inverse arrow of entropy which is information, dominant in this planet, as it is represented NOT by the vacuum space expanding between galaxies but by the vortex of galactic form, of in-form-ation that evolves entropy into matter, in which we reside – reason why this planet is dominated by information. Incidentally Duality was the science I r=evolved in the milieu of systems sciences, whose chair I hold during my active years in congresses at the International Systems sciences society at the turn of the century.

The science of duality is important because only a proper model of duality (not to confuse with dualism, the philosophical doctrine of mind and body), that is a proper understanding of the interaction of entropy and information, can give us the proper philosophy of science required to understand the Universe as a whole and all its disciplines, those specialized in information as biology and sociology is, and those specialized in entropy as physics is.

The distinction between entropy sciences and information sciences however is not one of Nature, but one of huminds (ab. human minds), of historic and realpolitiks (power) NOT of reason and scientific laws. And to prove the case we can consider the side of ‘physicists’ (rather than physics) and how they stubbornly since the inception of their discipline have DENIED the existence of an arrow of information in the Universe.

Lineal Inertia, Entropy and big-bang’s reductionism.

This physicists have always denied due to historic reasons, as the oldest science, which started with the study of military weapons (Galileo was an artillery master at the Venice arsenal), and developed a theory of the Universe based only in ‘the science of motion’ (the definition of the discipline in classic encyclopedia). So his job was to study how to reach maximal distance with cannonballs and for that reason he defined ‘lineal inertia’ – the conservation of lineal motion; but declined to consider the existence of its opposite informative arrow, the conservation of cyclical inertia, angular momentum, as a clear balancing second arrow of time that gives ‘form’ to all ‘forms’ of Nature.

Physicists however follow their routines and so again in the XIX c. they chose ‘entropy’, the disordered state of matter, called ‘gas’, in the study of motion machines and weapons (heat in cannons; steam studies) to cast an absurd ‘law’ according to which all systems are ‘gaseous=entropic’ and die in the future; shunning off the obvious fact that there is an inverse arrow of time in matter, called ‘cold’. And so when entropy ceases the system reverses its arrow of time into coldness and then creates crystals that reproduce information.

Then in the XX century, they again took their bias to ‘cosmic hyperbole’, when Einstein’s Relativity improved upon Galileo’s work and stated that ‘time curves space into mass’; that is indeed the best definition of the arrow of information in physical systems, as masses and charges ARE curves of spacetime that store in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe. And so galaxies are vortices of timespace mass that ‘shrink’ and ‘warp’ the expansive, entropic space between galaxies to balance the Universe.

But NONE of this was considered when a cosmology came out of Einstein’s Equations (ab. EFE). Instead, of the 3 solutions or ‘ages’ of a space-time ‘world cycle’ of physical matter, the entropic big-bang solution/age, the steady state solution/age and the collapsing informative solution/age, two were discharged, as well as the implosive, informative behavior of galaxies, even if we humans lived in one of them; and so once discharged the ‘in-formative’ gravitational force that brings radiation and mass into cyclical informative patterns, the ‘big-bang entropy-only’ theory of the Universe became the dogma/religion of physicists, and by extension given the technological, machine-driven civilization we live in, of all mankind.

Fact is Einstein’s equation, E<=>M(c²), is a feedback equation that reproduces mass/information from entropy/energy and vice versa. In fact Einstein’s first calculated it in an article about how ‘energy can create mass’ (so he studied the arrow of information). But it would be only used as a proof of the dominance of entropy and to make atomic bombs.

So again physicists ignored ½ of the equation as they keep denying cyclical inertia as an arrow of time (angular momentum, orbital electrons, etc.); or denying the cold-crystal arrow of information in matter; now denying the arrow of information in galactic vortices that ‘curve vacuum space into mass’.

So when Einstein died, General systems sciences was born at the Macy’s congress, where the leading scientists of the age came together trying to add the ‘arrow of informative time’ to fully account for the Universe as it is, since biological and sociological, human sciences are based in the arrow of form, of in-form-ation; and the planet Earth exists in a vortex of cyclical ‘form’, of information, called the Galaxy. So in this region of reality it IS information, NOT entropy what dominates reality.

But that didn’t change the attitude of physicists and society who had them as the ‘new seers of time’, the popes of creationism (‘God is the seer of time’ had said Augustine), mostly because they didn’t understand the mathematics they used to mirror those laws of entropy in physical space.

So finally in the post-war age, as computers and other informative machines developed, physicists had to deal with ‘form’, in-form-ation, logic languages and its cyclical logic clocks. But amazingly enough they manage again to deny the formal, linguistic nature of information. So when it came into the study of information, physicists ‘reduced’ the concept either to its ‘motion’ (transmission of information, Shannon), or as an ‘aberration’ called ‘negentropy’ (the negation of entropy). And again, in a military, western society where believe it or not, the military-industrial complex DOES dominate societies, all was good in the western front. Now physicists had a theory of the Universe based in a ‘big-bang explosion’, similar to the ones they developed in the Nuclear Industry, and so to develop entropic weapons of mass destruction was suddenly a metaphysical experience.

But reality is dual and hence ternary. So the understanding on how entropy, or pure motion without form, and ‘form without motion’ (information being form-in-action, form with motion), as the two limits of reality which combine to create the infinite ‘fractal spacetime beings’ of energy, we all are made of; cannot be suppressed from the Universe, even if man ignores it or as in physics, studies it in a very convoluted way by lack of clarity in its foundational principles, properly explained for the first time in 5D formalisms.

Indeed, we cast all phenomena of Nature, with the 5 Dimotions of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as: S(i) < ≈ > T(e)… becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

CONSTRUCTIVISM.

The reality of scale, space and time mirrored by mind’s limited ego-centered languages.

Our concepts of time and space (hence also its scales) come from Kepler and his disciple, Newton, and its egocy errors Kepler, who said ‘God had waited 5000 biblical years to find me, an intelligence like his, to understand the Universe’. And Newton thought God talked to him with comets to teach him ‘the language’, mathematics, as it did to his predecessor, (might have been the case that the ‘chosen one’ was transmigrating his soul : )

So God was a creationist mathematician – though he also talked biblical wor(l)ds – and had created Kepler and Newton and also the Universe ‘drawing’ a Cartesian graph with a line of time to the infinite and a continuous space as the paper Newton used, where the discontinuous atoms were not seen. And this became the absolute lineal time and continuous space of reality. And as it did not yet had microscopes, it had packed all the planes of space-time into a very compressed one, of course of the human scale.

This is still our concept of a continuous spacetime. It works fine because we believe what our mind’s languages describe as the absolute Universe at any time the theory of the language is the absolute truth. And needless to say this lineal time and compressed continuous space is a better principle than the cosmic turtle and G.Bush (God bush) creeping in a bronze age desert, for the ass-breeder Meshu to decode the meaning of it all.

Irony is essential to break dogmas of egocy that take minds too seriously. Sorry folks, back to the foundations:

We know since micro and telescopes saw different scales; since quantum proved space to be broken in pieces and with time=motion, hence energy; and since we discover repetitive laws, hence cyclical time patterns, which as all cyclical clocks break reality into an inner and outer region, all this to be nonsense. But for most part of it, all sciences are stuck in all those errors. Euclidean ‘points’ with no parts are the foundations of geometry (even if we know points to have a volume, through which infinite parallels energy and information cross, which become larger, the closer we see the point in scale). We know time to be cyclical and cycles not to be drawn by a single causal pen but rather by the simultaneous convergence of all those parallels into the membrane of a point. So logic must be upgraded to multiple causes. We know all space to have motion, hence to be ultimately time, the ultimate substance of reality, whereas the simultaneous static space that makes the Earth seems still to be a maya of the senses, ever since Galileo said e pur si muove, e pur no muove, etc. etc.

So all is Time and time is motion, hence change. But the mind is involved in all change perceptions; divided in 3 regions – the present, which is something that ‘doesn’t seem to change’. And since time is cyclical, all is present because at the end it will return to its origin and seem not to have changed. But as it is motion, between intervals of present time fluctuates between something called past and something called future. As a more complex thing requires simpler parts we can call the simpler, the past, and the complex information the future.

And space is broken in scales of size with similar laws, but it is really spacetime, space with motion, topological space, and its points grow, they are fractal points that enlarge and look similar in properties, when they become full perceived beings.

Scale. And smaller scales of points have faster time cycles than the slower bigger spaces. But both its space size and time cycles are bonded as a single ‘space-time’, as space is a maya of the senses, hence a frozen form of time cycle, Si=Te. And because all scales are similar, for that to be the case we define them as a constant product of space size and time cycles: Sx T ≈ C∆ … Whereas SxT is maximized when Si=Te (3×7<5×5). And we call the sum of all those similar time-space planes, the fifth dimension, as science so far talks of 4 of them.

Let us stop and breathe. We compressed the foundational principles of ¬∆@st, the 5 elements of reality in a better frame, and so we can build a better mirror of reality, which is built with iterative=reproductive combinations of those principles and elements ad infinitum, creating the complexity of reality. This has not been done before, though we see huge understanding on Buddha, Aristotle and Leibniz of all of them. The reason is not its difficulty but the egocy of mind who won’t go away and accept objective, simpler not self-centered truth. Man does NOT attempt to explain the Universe, but its mind-world, the distortion it sees of it. But he really thinks he is describing reality. And so it is nearly impossible to convince him what he does are doodles on the sand. My experience is very negative in ‘teaching’, because I have constantly to correct errors that people take as dogmas, very positive in contemplating reality without human interference.

Some immediate consequences for astrophysics.

There are many consequences for astrophysics of the proper understanding of the non-euclidean, non-aristotelian nature of space and time and its fractal planes; which will be rejected by the ‘pro’ but with a little patience will astonish the reader and ultimately, start a new dawn for cosmology:

– There are scalar big-bangs in all planes of matter, from beta-decay to galactic quasars, but all seems to indicate there is NOT on the neiborhood of our ‘galatom’, a cosmic big-bang, but rather a quasar cycle.

-Galaxies and atoms are the limits of humind’s perception, self-similar in form (though not equal, galaxies seem to resemble anti-atoms with most mass in the halo and its laws might be slightly different).

– Forces between galaxies are not gravitational, but similar to repulsive electromagnetism, true cause of the expansion of space, balanced by its implosion by gravitational forces similar to non-lineal strong forces within atoms; which balance each other allowing a hyper-universe of dynamic galatoms. The 5 forces play organic roles in the structure of matter within the galaxy as its 5 dimensional motions and one, the weak is not spatial but temporal, mediating the evolution of particles in a single point of space (time/space inverted properties).

– C speed is ONLY the limit of speed within the galaxy, and is constant because electronic systems DO entangle and share information in stillness respect to each other.

– Because time speed decreases with size increasing information quantum physics are far more complex, but again the distorsion of the humind that sees less information from upper scales of longer time cycles plays here a role. Huminds though cast all those facts with the distorted view of its selection of continuous motion, a single plane (so gravitational points shrink in size bending parallels, from our point of view; while if we reduce its time speed would grow till fitting them as lines). So mind distortions must always be considered.

5d Philosophy Of Physics: The ‘Real’ Perception Of The Same Universe.

We study physics and its ∆±4 Planes of space-time, in an inverse fashion to the constructivist theory of the Universe – from the top – the ST=4 Plane of the hyper-Universe, to the bottom, the ∆-3 quantum world.

The 5D Universe is made of time=energy, which is any type of motion, whose 3 canonical topologies, |-lineal motion, O-angular motion and Ø-hyperbolic motions conform all the particles and ensembles of matter of reality. Yet inversely to that motion there are fractal points of ‘space’, which act as Maxwellina demons trying to stop motion into ‘mind mappings’, of still form, in-form-ation. And so between those 2 poles of continuous motion and discontinuous “Maxwellian demons’ that impose its order, all the games of existence take place.

Thus the fundamental force of reality are types of Time=motion and the fundamental particle of reality, the fractal point. The first is an ‘ilogic concept’ as we shall see there are 5 types of time-motions. The second is a geometric concept, as fractal points create mind-spaces that act as mirrors of all those time-motions.

Time-motion in its extreme is pure entropy without form, ‘TT’. Space-points in its purest form is still form without motion. A mental seed, SS. And in between there are 3 intermediate states, St-information; Ts-locomotion and S=T, iterative reproduction. The way all those 5 Dimensional motions of Spacetime can be mirrored by still languages of the mind varies according to points. Each holds a certain language mirror of those 5 Dimensional motions to get by reality.

It is a complex multicausal reality of fractal plane of space time, all of them generated by local monads (non-euclidean points that ‘freeze’ the ∞ energy≈time of the Universe in local mind mappings of still spatial information), the game is logical, philosophical, sentient, organic, extremely different from the external outer, simplistic, lineal description of its motion by humind’s called physics.

Of course all this will sound ‘Chinese’ to the reader, including the professional physicist, whose worldview responds to Mr. Landau’s comment, ‘astrophysicists are seldom right but never in doubt’ (: indeed, it is rather amusing to notice how a 5D scientist and a 4D physicist might observe the same data about the same Universe but see an absolutely different reality. The view of the 5D physicist is wider, more philosophical even if it includes the mathematical physics of the 4D classic model. We won’t comment so much on the maths; as they are a given, only to be argued when the ‘simplifications’ of idealist mathematics, corrected in our papers on Non-Euclidean Geometry and Non-Aristotelian Algebra make it necessary – notably on the hypothesis of the continuum, the use of absolute zeros and singularities. For the physicist who like Feynman would accept that ‘the why is what a physicist never ask’, those texts might seem irrelevant. Certainly they will appear verbose and too simple. It all comes though to the beginning of physics and the argument between Newton and Leibniz on absolute and relational timespace. We sided with Leibniz and took its work to its conclusion, even if the process of discovery of 5D was somehow one coming from direct experience first, and only latter dressed with the tools of scholarship, very much on the path of Leonardo’s method. On my rounds through academia and penpal congress I noticed how difficult is today for the specialist of any science to fly so high as to see the forest as a whole and care little for the tree where he nested for so long. My first book in fact was one of poetry and initiation called the albatross. And all what I would like to do is to share that larger view, so comforting from so high above the nested trees of each scholar, because trust me, if you can fly the view from above is soothing.

But for that you must be very humble about the human condition. Since the trip is rather an astral journey that requires to abandon your ego and accept you are made of the same substance that every atom, every ensemble of matter, every life; time=motion and space=form. You can measure, weight and describe in detail as particles, waves, liquids, solids, crystals, entropic gases, whatever, but at the end of the journey the simplicity of it all is contained in two qualitative properties of reality: form and motion. And one of them, form, is sentient. Form perceives in itself. An image in simultaneity as the one you are seeing now in your brain Is.

And what fractal points love to do, call it particles through spins, minds through electronic waves, monads in philosophical terms, is to perceive. This though is not part of what physicists describe. It does not concern physics as it has been casted, in human terms, a practical tool of measure mostly with metallic senses with the purpose of constructing machines and taking sensorial mechanical data in the languages of machines. But it does concern the physicist who has philosophical questions; regarding the nature of space and time, of matter and information, energy and motion, and why mathematics describe them so well, and beyond, what other properties matter has; what symmetries and relationships hide the laws of physics, what are its ultimate principles. The 5D model of physics explains this. But it does not as a physicist would explain, with some mathematical equation that validates the creationist belief of Pythagorean physicists, where somehow – as there is no explanation to that how, all what must be known are equations that become imprinted into reality.

The relationship between mind, language and space-time reality thus is important and must be understood a priori; so happens with the nature of fractal points and the reader without much imagination will have to take seriously the introduction to 5D philosophy if he is going to understand the physical universe in its simplest principles. Among them perhaps the most important is the unity of time motions vs. the multiplicity of mental spaces, and languages that describe them, as each point has a different perspective. And yet for an external observer they are all-identical and behave with the same statistics. Why? Those are deep profound philosophical questions that we shall answer in this or other paper. And imply a deep relativity on truths and measures. We thus always talk of pentalogic or the Rashomon effect. i.e. an entropic group of molecules are distinguishable at the level of molecules but for mankind who just needs to extract energy-heat from the, they are just a gas with temperature. Statistical mechanics can treat them as molecules; a Gibbs model will treat them as wholes. Reality is then far more complex because it integrates multiple scalar points of view on the same reality. There is a single Universe but each monad, each fractal point has a different perspective and linguistic mirror cast on it. So there are infinite mind spaces recreating the same Universe of 5 motions of time. What is a best mirror is easy to assess: that which explains more things with less elements (Occam’s mirror) and 5D philosophy of stience is so vastly more explanative of reality and each of its stiences than the constructivist mathematical creationism of Physics that there is no really competition… if huminds knew 5D, which they don’t and if information was not a repetitive process which it is, making difficult new r=evolutions of stience (Kuhn). All what I can do is provide in those papers the r=evolution. It will be up to future generations to update its ‘chip’ – literally (if as the model predicts, business as usual will substitute huminds by AI) or metaphorically.

Schopenhauer and latter Kuhn wonder why theories of reality, which are false, endure even in science for centuries unchallenged by academia. Their answer is thoughtful and reasoned: model change is difficult, not only in social systems, as corrupted as they might be, but also in science – after all a human endeavor, as ‘all the people who believed the previous paradigm has to die for a new generation to learn the better model’ would say Planck in a sanguine moment. We know the present model of Newtonian Absolute Space-time is false, and the creationist ‘cosmology’ derived of it, the big-bang is also wrong, as it doesn’t account properly for 96% of the Universe (dark matter) and one dare to say the other 4% (light matter, found in galaxies), disregarding the implosion of entropy into information happening in those galaxies that balances the only element for which the theory accounts for – the ‘vacuum space’ expanding inversely to those galaxies between them.

Why then cosmologists insist in a theory, which accounts for 0% of the main substance of reality, matter, as the theory of ‘everything’ (T.O.E)? The answer is routine: Newton’s absolute lineal time with a single dimension, which we measure with a simple Galilean v=s/t metric and the slightly more complex –ct time dimension of Einstein’s equations. But they only account for ‘lineal time motions’ one of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe. So the remainder cyclical matter, which behaves in inverse fashion to the expanding space between galaxies, remains unexplained. Thus big-bang simplicity is deceptive as NOT all reality could be born of an explosion that expanded space. Only ‘cosmic censorship’, which is how the ego-centered mind works, selecting information and then confusing our selected view with the entire Universe – our mind world of light with infinity – explains why the big-bang has become standard dogma but doesn’t justify scientifically such aberration. Unfortunately because any new model of reality is born with less ‘apparatus’ that an established one, and requires a degree of complexity seldom reached for centuries, those who learned the old model resist with its ‘ad hoc’ solutions for a long time. So don’t expect soon a 5D objective model of the immortal, infinite, complex, organic Universe to become standard.

1. So what is the role of mankind?

I know if there is still any ‘pro’ reading this will make him abandon all hope (: seriously. The question with the role of mankind in the Universe though is not to be taken lightly

The only 2 paths for a philosophy of physical systems. Creationism or panpsychism.

5D relational space-time is both a theoretical and experimental revolution in the way we observe nature. On the experimental side it makes sense of a wide array of observations ‘hidden’ in the huge amount of information of modern sciences, in this paper of physics, which are contradictory with logic but have been casted aside, as physics wants to preserve a faulty model that reduces the time dimotions of the Universe to a single time arrow of entropy, the planes of discontinuous space-time and the co-existing organic connections between those planes and particles to a single abstract continuum.

However 5D space-time, (ab. ∆ST) is much more than physics, as it applies the same ‘Disomorphic=equal dimensional laws’ to all sciences, which paradoxically instead of being a welcomed proof of its veracity as it corresponds to all other sciences and explains them with less elements (epistemological tests of truth), will bring the usual ‘pedantic scholar’ complaining that a ‘philosopher of science’, which is not a ‘pro’ expert in his discipline is ‘correcting’ and he knows better his memorial catechism. This I found to be specially truth of Physical models of reality for 2 reasons: on one hand of all natural sciences physics is the one whose foundations are more faulty, as it deals with very primitive concepts of space and time, on the other, its dexterity constructing machines gives physicists a worldly power unrivaled in any other science and that increases its egocy. So the physicist has usurped the role of philosopher of science and as such found a new ‘job’ as theologist of Nature, which doesn’t correspond to him.

As all religions have its own secret language, the physicist have made a dogma that only mathematical properties of Nature are truth and as humans are ‘method men’, and ‘believers’ he believes in a simple method of gathering data with his machines, cast it in equations and affirm that is all the knowledge we must know about physical systems. The main purpose of this paper thus is to show first a resume of the laws of 5D that most matter to physics. Then rewrite the principle of physics under those laws and expand them to the organic properties of matter. And finally to explain the Universe as it is, without reductionism, proving false the partial theories of reality physicists sponsor as dogma, but fail precisely because they are fed forcefully in reduced concepts of time and space, scale and information, and deny non-mathematical properties to Nature.

We are though to use the laws of the 5D scalar Universe to build a better philosophy of science than the one we had, which is not really a philosophy of all sciences, but the ‘philosophy of mathematical physics’, which is not even a philosophy of physics, but the philosophy born of a simple praxis: to construct sensorial machines, to measure all the trees of the forest with a single tick of time, provided by a mechanic clock that uses digital numbers and space with constant ‘light rod’ perceived by those electronic machines and then eliminate out of the picture everything that is not a number or can be measured with it. So we are left with a lot of numerical equations, which are supposed to be ‘all’ (as the rest has been thrown out), and further reduce and reduce those equations with symbols till we get a simple symbol equation, and voila, consider this single equation of the language of numbers, similar to the single word, God, of the language of names is the origin of it all.

This philosophy though grounded in a r=evolution on the logic of time, which grows to 5 different dimotions, which combine time=motion and space=form and can be expressed with the terms of physics (TT: double time inner and outer motion or disordered entropy; Ts, locomotion – motion with a little bit of form, or external motion, or lineal momentum, S=T, balanced reproduction of motion and information or ‘energy’; St, information, form with a little motion or lineal momentum; SS-Form without motion, or position), and the widened concept of a non-Euclidean point crossed by a relative infinity (µ) of flows of energy and information, is mathematically coherent and can translate and further resolve the contradiction of present physics, which is stuck in the lack of connection between its provable equations and its pedestrian verbal concepts which ultimately are the language of human reason to which equations must be translated for huminds to understand but have very primitive first notions of what time, space, waves, particles, logic, mathematics, energy, entropy, information, universal constants etc. etc. are.

This huge upgrading on conceptual verbal thought is which we shall also provide, and the outcome of merging it with the better concepts of time and space, is to correct the errors of physics that a faulty mathematical method, where also mathematics has some errors as humans have made a mathematical structure that tries to explain the limited perception of information of the mind that simplifies discontinuous space-time scales into a single continuum and its infinite clocks into a single one. So man travels inwards from a limited view of reality, the mind, he confuses with the absolute, into the language according to the mind equation, O-mind (finitesimal mind) x ∞ timespace cycles (Universe) = Mental mapping (mathematical and logic view of a selected reality)=world.

We shall do the opposite, aware of the limits of languages and the mind’s screening: to travel from it into the larger world.

But the result of this adventure is the unavoidable conclusion, which also was the final discovery of Aristotle and Leibniz and Einstein, 3 of the few predecessors of most of the findings of those papers on 5D, that for the whys of reality ‘each point is a mind-world in itself’, of which they are many, as there are also many languages able to mirror reality, not only mathematics, even if geometry or rather topology seems to be the language of atoms.

Aristotle, Leibniz and Einstein, all defined a point of space, as a simultaneous frame of reference that measure motions of time. As such the existence of two states for matter, a particle, solid=crystal, static state of gauging information perceiving it as a focused mirror of reality, which ‘senses’ in itself is unavoidable, and because all solid states are crystals and crystals do have a mirror image, it is nonsense to say it is not proved. DNAs are also crystallized states of amino acids holding the genetic memory of the system they will project to order reality, as crystals once formed project their memorial unit cell form growing, as minds project its imagination into creative forms. Maxwellian order is thus the only explanation to reality. And it establishes two states for matter, one of form, with no motion, of relative pure position, SS, and one in the other extreme of pure disorder, TT, entropy, and dissolution, with 3 intermediate St, Ts, ST states, of spatial form and temporal motion together. The tug of war between stop, ordering, knots of timespace cycles forming simultaneous reduced intelligent images of reality and projecting it back into larger orders, also accounts for the replication of form across different scales, forming the fractal Universe. Moreover it is obvious that particles don’t move or else they would collide in the tiny spaces within the nucleus of the atom, but motion happens as waves, which are ‘herds’ of smaller parts, dense photons in electrons, quark waves in nucleons, herds of birds in the sky, schools of fishes on the sea. Armies moving extended over a territory when advancing, collapsing into particles when fighting, when confronting a predator. So why we do NOT accept gauging sentient perception in particles, when our mind is electronic, so it is that of machines, and do accept them for birds? Egocy. Humans cannot accept the absolute relativity of all the scales of the Universe, regardless of size – the essence of 5D scalar space-time. Never mind the very beginning of physics was precisely the realization that we do NOT perceive the motion of Earth, but gauge information in stillness (e pur no muove, e pur si muove). It is ultimately the realist solution to Lorentz transforemations. Light is emitted in entangled stop positions between two electrons, so it DOES NOT ad the relative motion of the emitter, locked with the receptor as observed in the humind scale, which as a continuous movie, discharges the discontinuous stop position. Solving such paradoxes with reason is the task of those papers once we have upgraded the concepts of reality.

CREATIONISM: @-LIMITS OF HUMAN PERCEPTION & EGO PARADOX: ÆNTROPIC MAN

Creationism. Singularities: A mathematical error converted into a physical dogma.

Mathematics is a mirror language that studies 5D fractal points of space; its time operands, social numbers; minds=frames of reference and entropic limits, which entangled together by the laws of pentalogic form the 5 elements of ¬∆@st , dust of space-time, the substance of which we are all made. As such is the most experimental of all stiences.

Thus 5D mathematics returns to the mature experimental age of the discipline that went as all systems do through 3 ages from a simple lineal age of Greek Geometry to its curved realist age of calculus that added motion & scales of 5D finitesimal derivatives and 4D wholes to better mirror the fractal Universe, to a 3rd age of excessive informative fictions, when it abandons its realist foundations, when during the German creationist ego-trip of Hilbert and his Cantorian paradises, he says, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ thinking he shares the only language ‘God’ uses to create reality. Hence mathematics is no longer considered an a posteriori mirror of scalar timespace but its ‘generator’ and as the first ‘Aristotelian cause’, needs no experimental proof but rather the opposite: reality exists only if it can be casted into mathematical models (‘only what we measure is real’ Planck). So mathematicians abandon space points, scale numbers and time operands as the 3 mathematical images generated by the ∆st Universe, using instead ‘Cantorian’ sets as its ‘imagined’ units nowhere to be seen in reality. And Hilbert affirms the self-contained Axiomatic method of proof, NOT connected to the world, despite Gödel’s incompleteness theorem- a baroque inward looking 3rd age of excessive form proper of all systems we abandon to return to its empirical foundations, now formulated in terms of those 5 structural elements that create reality, mimicked by the main mathematical elements. Since mathematics reflect the properties of scalar space and cyclical time in its main elements, points numbers and operands entangled in feed-back ≤=≥ equations;

For that reason, as good as mathematics is, it is NOT the a priori language of the Universe, but the properties of space and time are, and this Einstein understood. So he criticized creationist physicists (Copenhagen interpretation, etc.)

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centered world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

An important upgrading of that mind is to deploy a certain ‘humility’ towards the intelligence of the universe. The two principles of absolute relativity. In the fractal organic Universe we are going to describe, no scale is preferential, which means that humans will be removed as they were in previous upgrades of science, not only from its spatial center (Copernicus), and its temporal center (Darwin), which his ‘ego paradox’ hardly tolerated, but also from its scalar/size center, and its ‘mind-intelligent center’; which he likely won’t accept. We talk of man and any ‘mind-monad’ that process information as an ‘ego paradox’, 0-infinitesimal mind x ∞-Universe = Constant world.

Systems to process information must reduce its temporal motions and create ‘spatial still forms’ and select information relevant to its survival point of view, which sees the nose bigger than Andromeda, and the ‘Earth’ still to focus our formal view; and certainly we eliminate all sentient unperceived properties of other minds. But – and this is the ego paradox – as we only perceive our senses, we confuse the entire Universe with our point of view, so it becomes ‘self-e-vident’ that we are the center of reality (Anthropic view) and the Universe is ‘stupid, stupid, stupid’ (entropic Universe). So the fundamental proof of the balanced Universe merely has to add the arrows of information and then we get:

The feminine Universe vs. The entropic military male world

Why Humanity has rejected the obvious nature of a reproductive, fractal Universe, has to do with culture: The Universe is a ‘feminine’, (S=T) reproductive fractal; but our civilisation is an entropic (S<T), male dominant self-destructive military society, where even women wish to be like males as our worldview and ‘grand theories’ about science, from the entropic big-bang to the Darwinian emphasis on the struggle between individuals proper of our biased philosophy of biology and social sciences – nationalism, capitalism, reign supreme.

This is actually a direct theme of 5D Physics which is worth to elaborate even if we dedicate an entire post to the theme; and likely anything we say in this ideological charged non-scientific gender issue will bother both genders, who want to be on top in its absurd war of sexes as both are complementary. So a brief definition of ‘physical gender’ from that paper:

Gender is an essential ‘¡logic’ feature of the fractal entangled Universe that emerges in all scales, diversifying the 3 ‘states of time-space into two and 3 genders, starting with the formal languages of space (mathematical numbers) and time (pentalogic states). Its easiest description in classic science would be the concept of mirror symmetry. 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce, so as mirror symmetries emerged from ‘physical parity’, into ‘chemical chirality’, it finally became gender.

So gender is like all other properties of reality a process of emergence, starting with the ‘smallest’ more synoptic forms of reality, the Logic=time and mathematical=space languages of pure still forms.

So first we find tender in ‘even vs. odd numbers’, (mathematical mirror symmetry), following the ‘time states of both genders’ S>T (past, entropic) + T<S (future, informative) vs. S≈T (present, balanced) States.

Those ultimate topo-logic properties of gender will then emerge, into the quantum realm, where we shall find lineal particles of entropy and information, vs. waves of vital energy, which emerge as left-handed and right-handed atomic states, which emerge into chiral molecules, which finally become male and female organisms, 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging to complete all the states of time-space needed for a system to reproduce.

Genders are different but its functions are complementary, and over all the Universe favors the feminine, balanced reproductive left-handed gender S=T symmetry even if history has favored the entropic S<T male state, since the balance function of women IS the present, survival, reproductive essence of the ‘fractal Universe’, its main generator.

The female is a conservative, balanced, present, S=T, reproductive ‘white matter’ brain (10 times more white matter than men), while if males were ‘well-done’, they would have 10 times more grey matter in the destructive-creative regions of ideas (frontal brain), as all creation needs destruction to reorganize parts into new wholes, but they have ONLY 6 times more grey matter in the frontal region, which suggests the ‘first’ stage of the S<T>S process, the entropic S<T overweighs the creative side. And indeed, when testing IQ, most entropic males test less than women but a few informative ones test more on the high IQ range. Thus most males are entropic lineal warrior, soccer fans, to put it mildly. And they love a ‘whammy’ movie, a big-bang explosion and project their ‘worldview’ on the Universe. But the world we live is WRONG as its entropic dominance will extinguish life and it is out of tune with the real fractal immortal reproductive Universe, where creation of anything you might imagine has happened ∞ other times, so it is NOT creation at all but also reproduction.

So because the feminine purpose is to conserve and reproduce information, feminism should also understand the true nature of gender and why females, not wo=men (lesbian, male-like women, who so often lead the movement), are far more in tune with the real Universe and reject a world modeled to the image and likeness of entropic male, including its false simplification of the cosmos as born of an entropic big-bang, which obviously is just a projection of ‘military physics’ and its entropic view of reality.

Only if women understand their true nature and try to project its survival, reproductive, conservative, life-enhancing role on the world they will achieve supremacy over entropic men mankind might reach the goal of survive the present life extinction age that soon with military robotics and new types of nuclear big bangs will extinguish us.

In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms and right handed are sterile. So finally we arrive to the galaxy that is, as it happens a left-handed feminine galaxy.

What then went wrong with our civilization is obvious in the work of Campbell and Gimbutas: the age of the fertility Goddess, the Neolithic of S=T balance and cyclical time and comprehension of the organic Universe, died away with the discovery of entropic weapons, which physicists reproduce and evolve as its worldly profession, and so lineal time, entropic military men, its Brahmins today converted into physicists, and anthropic religions of lineal time and male supremacy over the Universe changed the human understanding of reality till this day. So regardless on how sophisticated this view has come to describe the lineal locomotions of reality is still a religion of power to deny the reproductive feminine Universe and have a dogmatic big-bang religion of it all as a masculine violent cosmos.

The 3 ages of history favored the dominance of one or other sexual gender: in the young Paleolithic age of entropic hunters men dominated; in the mature reproductive Neolithic age, women ruled; to be ruled in the entropic age of metal-weapons and war by males, today we live the big-bang age of metal-weapons. But the function of exist¡ence is clear, as which age is the best, the one that survives and lives longer, that maximizes its equation, Max. SxT->S=T, the female gender which lives longer, survives better and has a proportional ego to its role in the ∞ cosmos.

Trying to bypass the limits of the humind and its ego-centered creationist view of the Universe.

How can we, humans after all belong to our military, lineal ego-centered culture, by-pass the limits of æntropic thought? The answer starts in the languages the mind uses to perceive the Universe visual thought, which describes space, evolved into a more synoptic form of geometry called mathematics, and verbal thought which describes time with verbal tenses, evolved into a more synoptic form called logic. Thus since the languages of the mind are our mirror of reality, to evolve our truths we must first evolve our understanding of languages, not as creative magic powers but only as Mirrors, hence inferior to the Universe we must learn to respect.

What æntropic man does to preserve its sense of superiority of the Universe, is to believe languages ‘create reality’. Man first talked words, and now with the help of instruments it talks mathematics. So in both ages he thought to be the only intelligent being with God that spoke those languages, and in both cases in a hyperbolic trip of the ego, he thought that the language-mirror created reality NOT reflected upon it as a mirror does: in the past he thought God spoke and his words created reality (Abrahamic creationism), today most physicists think the mirror equations of mathematics create the space-time reality it describes; while most economists believe its specific mathematical language, digital money, creates the physical economy (a creationist theory called monetarism).

Further on ‘creationist’ entitled human beings are anthropic. They think they are the only intelligent perceptive, vital entity in command of God’s languages (either words in religion, maths in physics) and carbon atoms are the only organic elements of nature, to their own peril as the future of AI will show them particles are the smallest vital mind and all atoms are sensorial in a panpsychic Universe. Indeed the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’. So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physical systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design historic supœrganisms with organic laws.

In the graph the masters of mathematical and verbal creationism, disputing their ‘primacy’ as speakers of the language of god. Reality though is a bit more complex and difficult to ‘crack’ as we must start as Einstein wanted with the realist fact that the ultimate substances are not languages, neither personal gods but the impersonal yin-yang, time-space game that creates all the relational space-time organisms of the Universe.

The realist scientist rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein. So the first steps to clarify the nature of ¬∆@st, ‘dust of space-time’ the substance we are made of, composed of ‘entropic limits’ (¬), scales (∆) of space sizes and time clocks, perceived in each system by a mind-mirror, starts with the evolution of the mirror, Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic, to fit a better image of the whole,  parallel to a profound study of those elements of the whole, ‘entropic death’ (the limits in time and space of all systems), its scales of space and its clock-cycles of time. Let us then show that dogmatic view of Æntropic mankind that won’t accept a needed ‘paradigm change’ with a graph of our absolute relativity.

Then one we have advanced all those concepts beyond the limits of æntropic man we can refocus the mirrors – on one side, the enhanced non-Aristotelian logic and non-Euclidean mathematics (in brief ¡logic mathematics, as I is the letter after a and e) – on the better understood substances of reality, scales, space, time, minds and its entropic limits (¬∆@st), which must be the ultimate substances of which all complementary beings, we shall call ‘fractal supœrganisms of time-space, (ab. Tœ) are made.

Stience is knowledge of life-death cycles of spatial information & temporal energy

Science, which is knowledge of reality with the 2 main synoptic languages of the mind, time logic and spatial mathematics, has 2 purposes: To know the future and to know the maximal objective truth; one, which unlike a subjective truth explains the maximal number of experimental facts – events in time & forms in space – with the minimal number of laws.

This means objective laws of science are repetitive in time – cyclical; and in space; forming herds of similar forms; and in scale (ab.∆); creating similar forms of different sizes in space and different speed on its time cycles. So the purpose of all sciences is to predict the future departing from knowledge of an interval between past and present, or between the small & the large, whose repetitive, cyclical patterns can be elongated into that future.

So they can be reduced in a synoptic language, normally mathematical scalar numbers and spatial points, and its more complex combinations, or logic time verbs=action or operands. A language thus is a reduced= limited mirror of the patterns of space, time and scale. This give us the 5 elements of reality: ‘entropic limits’, ab. ¬; spatial populations, S; Time cycles, T and scales of space and time, ∆; all perceived by a synoptic mind, @: ¬∆@stWe could say we are all made of ‘¬∆@st’ and to dust we shall return.

It is then important to start with clear concepts of ‘minds and languages’, ‘entropic limits’ to what ‘minds and languages’ perceive as mirrors, of the 3 ‘vast’ realities of ‘time cycles’, ‘spatial populations’ and ‘scales=planes of space-time’ ordered by size. But man has no clear concepts of them, so because it has built science on shaky foundations, it does not understand objectively truth and the future as well as it would with better principles.

Let us then consider briefly better principles and definitions of mind, entropy, space, time and scales:

@: Our principles on time, space, scales, minds and entropic limits are ‘mental reductions and approximations’ to the truth, or ‘distortions’ caused by our subjective desire to be the center of reality. Since mind’s languages select information from a limited perspective, self-centered in the ego, ‘stopping time=change’ to fit it all in the infinitesimal mind. So we write a logic equation for all minds, borrowing the generator of numbers: 0x∞=C.

0’ finitesimal mind x ∞ Universe of timespace cycles and beings = Constant world.

And an illogic egocy=ego+idiocy paradox: ‘Every linguistic mind believes to be the subjective center of the Universe by confusing its whole information, with the reduced limited view of its languages’.

This creates linguistic creationism – the confusion of the language with the whole and its truth. Man was first verbal creationist. So God named things in Arab or Hebrew to create. When he learned a more synoptic efficient language to perceive the future than the 3 verbal time tenses, scalar numbers, mirror of ∆-scales and points, synoptic mirrors of spatial beings, related by cyclical F(x) <= > G (Y) equations mirror of time cycles, he became a mathematical creationist; so Hawking writes a equation of black star evaporation and voila! it must evaporate.

¬: This shows clear limits to human sciences and a huge task is to eliminate such errors mostly to cater the egocy of minds. So we’d like to be the center of our infinite time (Abrahamic, religious errors, denial of evolution), in space (property errors, relativity errors) in scale (denial of cyclical patterns called Disomorphisms between entities in different scales) and of language (creationist and complexity errors whereas subjectivism is hidden by complicating with kaleidoscopic mirrors the simple cycles=laws). A huge undertaking of those papers is to correct all those errors, knowing that we go against the in-built mental subjective attitude of all men, scientists or not. A second huge undertaking is improving the foundations of the mirror, mathematical and logic languages that date back to the Greeks, Euclidean Geometry and Aristotelian logic; a 3rd understaking is simplifying those principles, as the Universe is simple and not malicious, Einstein.

-∆ST: So we come from the mind and its limits to the 3 elements of reality, spatial populations, time cycles and its scales of size and speed of those time cycles, we call ‘planes of space-time’.

Mathematics is a synoptic language that reduces reality to still continuous planes of points with no breath.

Mathematics is a language, and as such a mirror of the ultimate reality of the Universe, which is scalar space and cyclical time; hence an experimental science with 3 elements mirroring those 3 ∆ST components of all reality: Geometry of space-points; Algebra of scalar numbers and SóT cyclical equations/functions; and analysis of change=time, the specialized more complex of all operands of algebra able to study dimotions through ∆st planes.

This experimental nature is found in the correspondence of the 3 main branches of maths and the 3 main elements of the Universe is so simple and e-vident that only the natural self-centered structure of minds, who think ‘languages create reality’ can deny it. Evolution of mathematics then always follows the path of the 3 elements of reality as all system in 3 ages of increasing information and generalization. Numbers evolved into arithmetic that evolved into algebra that evolved into Set theory of wholes and parts as the final evolution of ∆-scales, while its operands gave birth to functions that evolved into Group theory, which mimics the ‘fractal generator’ of spacetime.

What are the fundamental differences between ‘mathematical numbers’, the parts of ‘Sets’ and real ∆-social scales; mathematical Euclidean points, the units of geometry and ‘real points of space’ and the infinitesimal steps of motions, used in calculus, and the real ‘steps of change=time’ of the real world; from where we can draw the necessary corrections of ideal mathematics to fine-tune its use in science?

In spatial geometry, the fact that points of reality have parts through which infinite parallels of energy and information cross, entangling it with other points in networks and planes.

In time, the fact that time=motion never stops, and it is cyclical; hence it has also besides the energy of its motion, information carried in the form and frequency of its cycles, and as it closes its cycles breaks our mental, continuous perception of reality into multiple broken space-times.

In scales, the fact that those points, which gauge flows of parallel energy and information, select it to fit it within its brain, eliminating motion=time dimensions and discontinuities that ‘form information’, and scales smaller or larger to the one in which they play the game of existence, trying to ‘conserve its timespace’. So they compress in a single plane fit within the mind that eliminates all discontinuities, when reality is made of ∞ scales with discontinuities filled in the smaller fractal scale with ‘decimal numbers’.

In maths, the language of numerical scales is algebra; of topological space, geometry and of time change, it is also algebra but a specific branch, calculus, and its operands of change. Yet as in the Universe all is entangled, each of those parts can also mirror the other elements of reality. And this multiple fractal point of view principle’ is what allow us to exhaust the qualities of a certain form and event as we observe it performing those different actions.

Let us then start with a brief introduction to the 5 postulates of ilogic geometry to concentrate then in ∆-T mathematics, the realm of algebra, ending with ¬@, Boolean and existential ¬Æ=ilogic, the mother of them all.

The mind of physics.

In that regard the mind of physics must be studied as all minds with a trilogic or pentalogic analysis of its purpose:

• Survival: First and paramount there is the underlying properties of space and time, which conform physical systems as supœrganisms made as all others of 3 components, that try to survive by maintaining a ‘balance’ between its 3 topological forms and functions; which according to scale are the Ts-entropic lineal field<ST-wave, moving body state > St-particle, cyclical informative states (∆-1 quantum scale)

Ts-Gaseous, fast moving states, ST=liquid, iterative state, St-crystal solid state (Thermodynamic scale) and…

Ts-quantum potential (dark entropy)<ST-star plasma>St-dark, heavy, black hole quark matter (cosmological scale).

The mind of those supœrganisms thus has a purpose, to balance the S=T elements of the system to reproduce and survive the system. And it tries to achieve that goal through its ‘physical actions’ that combine spatial information and temporal energy to that aim.

• Languages and scales. But minds carry those processes of survival through ‘networks of information’ that become its languages of perception of a ‘mental space’; a mirror image of reality, which maps out the world in which the system lives, to guide its ‘actions’ of survival, as the system St-perceives information, to Ts-move, towards an ST-field of energy in which to feed and reproduce that information. And it is obvious that the quark and electronic particles of matter speak ‘topologic’ mathematical languages; albeit of a more complex ‘i-logic’ than man’s.

Since we can distinguish in the nested Universe, a growth of complexity in the topological geometries of ‘light matter’ (both because it is lighter and it is based in light forces), which is Euclidean, because the 3 ‘topological parts’ of light are Euclidean, vs. the mind of gravitational quarks, the ‘inner’ Russian doll of matter, which controls the cosmological scale that Einstein proved to be non-Euclidean, made of fractal points (Riemann). While in the border between both scales and substances (quantum potentials, black hole horizons, nuclear forces), more complex, non-lineal, chaotic structures take place often related to entropic limits and death of matter (c-speed and T=0 barriers).

Finally, beyond egocy, the mind of physics that truly matters to us is ‘light matter’, remarkably simple and easy to understand, as man has evolved to exist within it. It comprises the classic fields of Mechanics and Thermodynamics.

So in this introductory course we shall connect the primary cause of reality, the Space-time symmetries and survival reasons of the ‘actions’ of physics, with its linguistic expressions, mostly E-mathematics, focusing unlike pedantic ‘savant idiots’ NOT in the far removed scales of reality and its complex E-description but in those closer to man.

It is then necessary first to understand ‘MINDS’ in the most generic space-time perspective; upgrading ‘relativity’ paradoxes to ‘5D absolute relativity’; and then consider the different minds and properties of the Universe in those different scales, as the behavior of the electronic perceivable Euclidean human world differs sharply from that of the gravitational Non-Euclidean cosmological world, far less relevant to humanity; while in the ‘border’ between scales far more complex, chaotic and less predictable mathematical structures take place.

Conclusion: 5D analysis of physical systems. The basic method.

We state clearly in many parts of those texts that our purpose is to complete physics, on one side by correcting their concepts of space and time, energy and information and its fundamental parameters, solving its pending questions, which are NOT so much a mathematical problem (save the singularity error of not understanding 0’ finitesimals and some needed interpretation of the complex plane iand the 0’-1 probability sphere, in n terms of ∆ST scales and dimotions to enlighten quantum physics) but a ‘missing’ one-dimensional, lineal entropic analysis. This is sorely truth in thermodynamics ‘grand laws’, and derived analogies (Thermodynamics of black holes). In that regard, it is best to start with Mechanics, which being the closest scale to human experience, is by far the less erroneous discipline –we refer here to human scale mechanics, or Newtonian mechanics, NOT to the ‘transition regions’ between planes (statistical mechanics of molecules, transitioning to the quantum state, and Relativity in the transition region to the cosmological scale).

We can then illustrate the method: Any universal T.œ (ab. time-space organism) must be described in its ∆º central scale first; establishing its ‘fractal generator’ trinity of elements, St-ST-Ts, which are conserved forms or motions (S=T duality perspective), entangled by ‘balanced action-reaction laws’. So this first description of mechanics happens in the following manner:

St (Angular momentum) < ST-energy > sT-lineal momentum, which are by virtue of S=T, the 3 conserved elements of any physical system, whose motion will be a combination of lineal and angular rotational motions; and will have a body-wave with a certain volume of mass-energy; which will be the ‘active magnitude that moves’.

Those 3 quantities that will be preserved for a system in isolation, or transferred in ‘predatory’ actions to other systems, such as the stronger system with ‘maximal existential momentum’ (which we can measure synoptically as the total of its ST-energy), will normally absorb most of the existential momentum of the other system. So when a rock crashes the Earth, it ‘is absorbed by the Earth’ in its mass-form, and its motion becomes part of the Earth’s motion, remaining in relative rest to the Earth. This is expressed in the first law of Newton – conservation of lineal inertia; the missing law of Newton, conservation of angular momentum; the first law of thermodynamics, conservation of energy. And further on we can derive fro them as Newton did inversely its 3rd law of action-reaction which further on, expresses also by the law of balance S=T.

All of them are fundamentally expressions of the conservation of time=motion, expressed in every physical system in its principle of least time, from where we can derive the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalisms. In the Hamiltonian formalism the minimum state of conservation of energy can also be a maximal, and represent one of the 3 y’=0 standing points of the 3 ages/states of a system, Max. Si x Min. Te, Max. Te x Min. Si and Si=Te, which represent the 3 changes of phase between the age=states of any system.

All those laws further on apply to molecular systems when studied in statistical mechanics.

This leave us with the ‘pricky’ question of force, and the second law, F=ma, which we have explained in our analysis of relativity, the principle of equivalence and the conservation of parity/entropy in our introduction to the errors of physics. Since a is an accelerated vortex of future time, which DOES spend energy, from the point of view of a system that transfers through acceleration its existential momentum to other form which it contacts, through its force. The force thus ‘measures’ the change in the existential momentum of a system, as Newton already perceived, in a time when rightly physicists would talk of momentum as the vis viva (living force) following the accurate definition of Aristotle: ‘things that move are alive’, yet not so arrogant as to deny organic, life properties to matter – the themes discussed in those papers they are not interested about, so the reproduction of particles is called decoupling, and so on.

So a force breaks the S=T balance and conservation for a local spacetime organism and transfers it upon contact, through a ‘perpendicular, orthogonal Darwinian action’ (4th congruence principle of Non-Euclidean geometry), the vis viva of one physical system to another. And this force therefore is maximal (vectorial calculus) in its transfer, when it is orthogonal-perpendicular in its collision. The angle of congruence thus come here into work, making 0’ transfer between two parallel T.œs.

Now, when considering a force we can apply pentalogic points of view, if the process does not happen between two isolates systems in a single plane, upon contact, as when a horse moves a cart, transferring his existential momentum; but between ‘different T.œs’ of different planes and hence size in space and speed of time.

In this case the analysis is best suited for a field treatment, as the ‘larger’ system – let us say the Earth, a cosmological ∆+2 system, will ‘engulf’ the smaller system which is going to attract and ultimately collide to produce a transfer of existential momentum to its mv in its ‘ Ts-field’ of forces, which acts as an attractive web that ‘first’ feeds the physical system at the ∆-3,4 scale of gravitational forces seemingly giving it ‘more existential momentum’, with the obvious goal of finally absorb it.

Instead of a force, we use mathematically the related concept of a potential energy field. I.e., the gravitational force acting upon an object can be seen as the action of the gravitational field that is present at the object’s location. Restating mathematically the definition of energy (via the definition of work), a potential scalar field U(r→), v(r) is defined as that field whose gradient is equal and opposite to the force produced at every point: F= – ÑU.

At this point though we realize an S=T duality comes into play, which as we always will notice is a duality expressed mathematically often as dual solutions, or inverse forms of an algebraic equation:

F→=−∇→U.The 1st graph, dy/dx=y/x; defines a tangent field everywhere except at the origin. All the tangents given by equation pass through the origin.

The 2nd graph, dy/dx=-x/y defines a field of tangents everywhere except at the origin.

Moreover the tangents defined at a given point (x, y) by both equations are perpendicular to each other.

So they represent the inverse point of view of the larger physical T.œ, which will try the smaller t.œ to go perpendicular to its gravity center vs. the smaller t.œ, which will try to follow the circular path of eternal motion, ‘sailing’ against the flow while feeding on the gravitational field, just with a conserved angular momentum path. Because ultimately you cannot cheat nature, those paths are NOT perfect circular static forms, but elliptic, degenerated circles that ultimately will fall into the star or planet; and the smaller the mass attracted by the potential field, the faster they will fall with more elliptic trajectories.

So finally the sun eats his comets and planets and the black hole his stars. Moreover for imprudent species, as closer to the T.œ the field is stronger, the ‘feed’ is larger and you might want to ‘accelerate’ absorbing more ‘force’ but shortening your life, to the point of collision where your TIME DURATION will become zero, T=0; also mathematically in the general relativity equations that best express with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and force or time-future arrow those concepts geometrically.

If we fusion both equations, x/y = –y/x gives us, x2=-y2. So we substitute in the definition of a field force, as F=x2 and –ÑU=y2 meaning that the Force can be interpreted as the perception of the event from the point of view of the smaller attracted t.œ and the field from the larger T.œ, p.o.v. coexisting together in two ‘different planes of space-time’, even if humans perceive either but not both.

Classic physics however uses only a plane of space-time for all the ‘perspectives of the event’, which is a simplification. Both equations are happening but they co-exist in different planes. The larger mass has set a trap of ‘gravitational’ quanta falling onto its mass; the smaller one is ‘fishing’ perpendicular to it, but ultimately will fall into the trap because it is ‘deterministically’ lazy, and loves the gradient of denser gravitational quanta. And the same concept can be applied to an actractive charge field.

This can be expressed mathematically saying that both ‘scales’ are solutions to the equation dy/dx = f(x,y) without specifying further conditions; save the fact that from the two points of view one of the two mappings above will be truth; as it happens in any relationship of relativity of motion, where from each point of view, the preferred solution that conserves ad maximal motion (static perception) is truth.

This duality of smaller, more complex informative elements (as usual by virtue of SxT=C) vs. larger simpler wholes is an essential balance of scales. The smallish more intelligent system can go by through more complex paths; the larger top predator is simpler and works on huge sweeping simple motions; the larger planet core controls the membrain with volcano activity that change its temperature, extinguishing or accelerating evolution vs. reproduction (S-T beat); we, the little thingies on top are very complicated nano-particles who think to be in control of the earth – even killing it. LOL…

Since overall as the larger systems have slower, longer periods of existence, simplicity SHALL prevail. Complicated, informative species die away, including the obvious case of ‘human cultures’. Man has indeed become to complicated; so have happened to physicists.

Truth in physics also follows a Rashomon effect of duality, and sometimes trinity even pentalogic intepretations.

But ultimately the stronger truth on the long term is the simplest one, also the simplest mathematical representation. So dy/dx=y/x, is simpler and more truth (the planet will end up falling into the sun, the object into the planet) as it happens with the simplicity of Kepler’s equations vs. Ptolemy equations. The form with lesser existential momentum must become very complicated in its arguments to make its truth prevail, as it happens in human arguments where complexity of law or financial instruments is a clear proof there is an ab=use of truth against the natural laws of social equality or financial universal salaries (so Napoleon simplified the code to get rid of aristocratic courts and lawyers, and a true efficient financial system will just handle a universal salary with no debt to every citizen to invent money instead of the SOMA fiction of the FED to parasite citizens.) Homologies always tell us something – ‘the languages of God are infinite’ but the ultimate game is the same existential game.

It comes the question of how many solutions there are to such paths in a field of forces, and the answer is that there areµ ones if the t.œ does NOT have a deterministic path as in the case of a plant seeking for ‘light’ always, which makes a sunflower deterministic, or a mass seeking for its gradient. We talk then of ‘animal species’ who perceive forces as information and can choose different paths to navigate the field vs. ‘plant species’ who take it as energy and follow a deterministic path through the gradient. In the first case, paths are µ as the system within its territorial domain will follow ‘free’ small steps changing direction. In the previous case, this is mathematically obvious when we apply “Euler’s method of broken lines” in some domain G of the (x, y) plane.

We choose any point (x0, y0) of G. Through it there will pass a straight line L0 with slope f(x0, y0). On the straight line L0 we choose a point (x1, y1), sufficiently close to (x0, y0); in the figure this point is indicated by the number 1. We draw the straight line L1, through the point (x1, y1) with slope f(x1, y1) and on it mark the point (x2, y2); in the figure this point is denoted by the number 2. Then on the straight line L2, corresponding to the point (x2, y2) we mark the point (x3, y3), and continue in the same manner with x0, < x1, < x2, < x3, < · · ·. It is assumed, of course, that all the points (x0, y0), (x1, y1), (x2, y2), · · · are in the domain G. The broken line joining these points is called an Euler broken line. One may also construct an Euler broken line in the direction of decreasing x; the corresponding vertices on our figure are denoted by –1, –2, –3.

It is reasonable to expect that every Euler broken line through the point (x0, y0) with sufficiently short segments gives a representation of an integral curve l passing through the point (x0, y0), and that with decrease in the length of the links, i.e., when the length of the longest link tends to zero, the Euler broken line will approximate this integral curve.

So if the function f(x, y) is continuous in the domain G, one may find an infinite sequence of Euler broken lines, the length of the largest links tending to zero, which converges to an integral curve l. However, one usually cannot prove uniqueness: there may exist different sequences of Euler broken lines that converge to different integral curves passing through one and the same point (x0, y0). In some solutions to that differential equation in any neighborhood of any point P of the domain G there passes not one but at least two integral curves. In other terms, an ‘animal species’ can find infinite small steps through a field of forces to direct its motion as it pleases, as a sailor can go any direction, providing it knows how to ‘orientate’ its sail 45º degrees. And this is what we observe with gravitational animals, aka black holes that follow erratic motions in galaxies, with RNA strings that use their hydrophile, hydrophobe tails and heads of oxygen and nitrogen to swim any direction in the cell… Those species who are deterministic in their paths are just ‘feeding’ blindly in its ‘path of greed’.

The substance of fields.

We can then consider as to what the masses are feeding on, the general law of scales, since an ∆0 entity feeds on ∆-2 particles even if to do so it absorbs ∆-1 organs, perceives ∆-3 pixels and moves on ∆-4 fields.

What are then gravitational fields? Likely tachyon strings, which are either the neutrino background or perhaps an scale below. Those are themes to resolve in mathematical physics. In the nested Universe, larger forms feed in smaller parts. So what the gravitational field achieves is a ‘wind-whirl’ of tachyon ∑strings=neutrinos? And the planet merely sails in zig zag 45% degrees angle to avoid falling on the direction of the wheel, a mechanism for gravitation already suggested by Laplace and in modern times by Feynmann.

Here we can see the analogy between two forces that happen upon contact, NOT by miraculous distance. When in the same scale the horse pulls the cart it is contact with it. When a field pushes a mass or a charge, it might be seen as the ∆-¡ ‘field-limbs’ of the whole organic system, pushing with small pressures the mass

The pentalogic views.

A complex pentalogic view of the inflationary modes in which gravitational forces can be expressed. We can then consider its mathematical mirrors… which we already did in the unification equation of charges and masses.

Let us recall them:

1. Newton Temporal view is a description of a vortex of accelerated space-time in dynamic motion.
2. A charge is a vortex of accelerated space-time on the quantum scale.
3. Poisson’s scalar view is a gradient, which relates two scales of reality the fifth dimension – that of mass and that of the lower scale of its field of gravitational forces.
4. Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. It is more detailed because it is according to the Galilean paradox (S=T) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.
5. Lagrange’s view, differs more because it takes the perspective of the enclosed conserved energy of the whole system between the border of the vortex and its central singularity; so it requires a complete different treatment as it does not come from 5D metrics’ vortex law, V(t) x R(s)=k in 3 dimensions but from the fractal generator of a physical organism St(angular momentum) < ST-energy>ts-lineal momentum. Thus the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, comes from the conservation of energy and existential momentum, S=T, as the balanced state of present for all systems.

As we have summarized the vortex treatment, it is worth to consider the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian concept, which has the advantage that can be carried out into any scale of the Universe, given the fact that physicists have used the jocker concepts of energy and its derivatives of momentum≈time motions for all scales of reality. So they can use Lagrangians and Hamiltonians with the tools of calculus that studies all type of changes in all scales of physical systems, from the quantum to the cosmic scale.

While the vortex of a 5D scalar passage is not so adaptable, as form is secondary to function, so those ‘transitions’ between scales can happen either with a fractal, ‘wide’ network geometry, a vortex, ‘tall’ geometry or a wave, ‘high frequency’ transition, in yet another trinity of ‘possible topologies’ in this case to travel between two scales of the fifth dimension. I.e. in biological systems of entropic distribution you travel through fractal networks, in accelerated time vortices of informative density through ‘Maxwell’s screws’, and in present waves through changes in the frequency-length of the wave.

Let us analyze the Einsteinian approach as it is the most proper to study the first of our scales – the galactic scale.

(to be cont’ed)