**SUMMARY:**

**The Neutrino scale.**

In that regard the ∆-4 scale of the cosmos has in its micro-spatial finitesimals, as all planes do, its minimal elements to become a ‘whole plane of existence’ described by ternary generator, whose elements are:

*-Tiƒ,* only a known particle, v, the neutrino, which therefore IS THE EQUIVALENT to the ¥-photon, the only ‘known’ particle that fills completely the light space-time ª∆-3 scale in which we live). And it also shows the duality particle-wave as:

*-An ST,* wave, with 3 ‘time phases’ of evolution, parallel to those of electrons and quarks (electron, muon and tau neutrino).

*-And an Spe field*, of which humans have only a theoretical term, added ad hoc by Einstein, a Universal constant that defines the entropy/energy (physicists are at pains to define both, so for the time being we shall just say ‘e’), lambda, the cosmological constant of Einstein’s space-time, which tilts one side or the other, around zero to define the 3 ‘topological’ arrows of all space-time fields of the larger scales of the Universe.

So as in the neutrino’s ternary particles and waves, we do find *in the parameter of pure space, at the planck scale the 3 topologies, describe by EFE:*

- A warping space (elliptic solution), a wave space (hyperbolic solution), a expansive space (big-bang solution).

This we know as certain and it is worth to explore. Many other ‘fantaphysical’ particles and equations are either wrong, or redundant equations which merely obscure the understanding of those known-known, theoretically sound, experimentally proved elements to start our construction.

*Then with the homologic, isomorphic method we can easily PICK among all the work of fantaphysics and sound physics on the ∆-4 unknown planck scale, the theories that make sense, with the particles that make sense and reject all others in a simple, efficient, using our Occam’s razor to throw them out… ‘to the nearest black hole’*

So what we have to connect the Neutrino BG and the larger ¥-ray and what tells us about the neutrino in ∆-metric?

*– We actually have The Theory by the forgotten genius of quantum physics, Mr. De Broglie, an autist French Aristocrat (being a french-spanish≈ catalan one known by his autism beyond these webs, I do have feeling for him, but don’t worry I don’t choose people but theories): It is called the neutrino theory of light and IT is right, and it tells us a few things:*

- As De Broglie shows in his wave-particle duality, expanded by Bohm and today proved the right interpretation thanks to the EM engine (HE not Bohr, discovered and interpreted properly Bohr just stole the fame and misinterpreted),
*photons must have a minimal mass and an internal clock. We have seen both things to be equal: a mass is a closed cycle, so ALL particles must have a minimal mass, as a closed ‘vortex-like’ motion, offers ‘inertia’ to be displaced lineally.*

Then it is obvious by 5D metric (Spe x Tiƒ ≈ ∆; Spe ∆-1 > Spe ∆; Tiƒ ∆> Tiƒ ∆-1) that the lower ∆-1 scale of light, the ‘quantum potential’ of B2 theory (ab. Broglie-Bohm) MUST be faster than the c-light scale; that light must have a potential limit of life, as mass always decays (Which must be calculated in terms of a quasar big-bang and the loss of light in the far away distances that dark away – we do NOT see light beyond a limit o distance, not because of a cosmic big bang limit of Universal age but because light tires to red-expansive motion and dies away into neutrinos.

In the next ‘∆-3’ scale we shall explain all this. Broglie explained that 2 neutrinos can give birth to a light beam; as usual the guy was panned by the Bohr circle, as *the man would do whatever it takes to steal the fame of the duality theory. *

*So *with its cut-throat approach they found an small error: for those 2 neutrinos to give birth to light, they must be perpendicular to each other. Alas! THAT IS THE IMMEDIATE function/form in GST for smaller particles, which ARE used to communicate the UPPER scale, and to generate it (so you are generated by cells, and when communicating you are looking to the person you talk). So indeed precisely that is the way neutrinos connect and entangle and allow spooky effects between photon and ∑photon=∆+1 electron particles. NEUTRINOS connect them at faster than c speeds (non-local), from A to B, then B-particle communicates with A, and a more complex information at slower speed, called a ¥-ray with more ‘form’ (transversal as opposed to longitudinal polarisation) happens.

It is NO longer a neutrino, a ¥-ray is born. And vice versa, ¥-ray dissolves after going ‘redshift’ to the limit of its entropy into neutrinos. This we said for decades, on deaf ears (PHYSICS is a fundamentalist, dogmatic science, closer to religion with its pretension to substitute philosophy of science as the mother of all truths; so astounding as it might sound to the naive idealist scientist, as economics, another religion mechanical power, doesn’t take lightly attack on dogma, and dogma is mechanical power).

Yet now as new ‘players’ (Asians) come in, a bit of reason is entering. So the neutrino theory of light and neutrino physics is all the rage. We shall not enter into hardcore theory, this is not the purpose of this blog, which just tries to ‘prune the tree of science’ of its bad fruits (ethically and intellectually). As it would make it all very cumbersome (perhaps in the 3rd line). But alas a good paper on the reverse ‘light theory of neutrinos’ (decay and creation of them at >>c speed) has been recently blogged. So we cut-paste this text:

“If photons can die, they could give off particles that travel faster than light.

Many particles in nature decay over time. For instance, radioactive atoms are unstable, eventually breaking down into smaller particles and giving off energy as they do so.

Scientists generally assume photons do not break down, since they are thought to lack any mass with which to decay. However, they might instead potentially have masses too small for current instruments to measure.

“How much do we actually know about photons?” asked particle physicist Julian Heeck at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics at Heidelberg, Germany. “They led to several revolutions in science, but their properties are still a puzzle.”

The current upper limit for the mass of the photon is less than two-billionths of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a kilogram. This would make it about less than a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of the mass of a proton.

The extraordinarily long lifetime Heeck calculated is an average. “There is the possibility that some photons have decayed,” he said.

If photons do break down, the results of such decay must be even lighter particles, ones that would travel even faster than photons. Assuming photons have mass, “there is only one particle we know from the Standard Model of particle physics that might be even lighter — the lightest of the three neutrinos,” Heeck said.

Neutrinos are ghostly particles that only very rarely interact with normal matter. Countless neutrinos rush through everyone on Earth every day with no effect.

“It might well be that the neutrino is lighter than the photon,” Heeck said. In principle, each photon might decay into two of the lightest neutrinos.

“The lightest neutrino, being lighter than light, would then actually travel faster than photons,” Heeck said.

The idea of neutrinos that move faster than photons would seem to violate the notion, based on Einstein’s theory of relativity, that nothing can travel faster than light. However, this assumption is based on the idea of the photon not having any mass. Einstein’s theory of relativity “just states that no particle can travel faster than a massless particle,” Heeck said.

Intriguingly, the speed that photons travel at means their extraordinary life spans will pass by quickly from their perspective. Einstein’s theory of relativity suggests when particles travel extraordinarily quickly, the fabric of space and time warps around them, meaning they experience time as passing more slowly than objects moving relatively slowly.”

Indeed, the end is what decided me to pay-per-view Physics letters to read the maths and it looks good. I liked this *fundamental truth of GST, our relative inner subjective time clocks make our lives to be similar in time. So a cell ‘dies’ by splitting into 2 new cells every 1 to 3 days. An ant that thinks 10 times faster lives 7 years (queen) equivalent to our 72 years (7 x10).*

And photons the ‘cells’ of all our light space-time Universe live in internal time-clock, a billionth of a day, if according to my calculus they live in external time for 1o billion years (as stars do and the horizon problem seems, from their perspective, they will only live about three years).

**Errors and insights on ‘invisible physics’. The scaling and hierarchy problems.**

It is worth to mention again that as physicists do not study the scalar ∆Universe, things are a bit messy on the department of a clear streamlining of equations and knowledge. *The problem has no solution due to the inflationary nature of professional computer-aided **research which needs to produce meaningful paper and cannot CLOSE WITH THE SINGLE TRUTH, the myriad of grants and money for research in all those other idealist truth that pump up budgets for Craig computer power.*

Indeed, the biggest HURDLE TO ACCEPT TRUTH WHICH IS ALWAYS SINGLE (ALBEIT with multiple causality to create a being) in this case the neutrino truth of the ∆-1 scale is that THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE, inventing particles and feeling gods of physics to tell the THEME IS CLOSED, ONLY NEUTRINO theory is worth to explain the lower scale and all its synonymous (dark energy, interstellar space, super gravitation, string planck scale etc.) Cut the bullShit or else it is all messy.

And of course add GST so things make sense between discontinuous scale. One simple example will suffice:

The most important and obvious of those errors is the so called ‘Catastrophic vacuum’.

In cosmology, the *cosmological constant problem* is the disagreement between measured values of the vacuum energy density (the small value of the cosmological constant) and the zero-point energy suggested by quantum field theory.

Depending on the assumptions, the discrepancy ranges from 40 to more than 130 orders of magnitude, a state of affairs described by Hobson as “the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics.”

The magnitude of this discrepancy is such that the statement “the observable universe consists of exactly one elementary particle” is at least ten orders of magnitude more accurate (-;

Several authors have recently identified and pondered the significance of this erroneous ratio of the theoretical and observational estimates of the energy density of the vacuum, bu only Nottale (1993), one of the few physicists that have my deep respect for his study of the scalar Universe (albeit only in the context of physics) associated it, rightly with a scaling law for the cosmological constant.

In fact, the reader will realise if he has ‘enough knowledge of GST that the number is exactly a 10ˆ(¹º x³ x 4) scaling, meaning that it is the canonical 10¹º difference of Sp-length (single dimension) between the ‘units’ of each higher plane, multiplied by 4 dimensions of space-time through which the force can spread for each plane, and 3 sub-scales within each ‘big plane’.

So what this means is that as each plane ‘filters’ the energy and information that can ’emerge upwards’, we have a ‘3 times problem of hierarchy’ here. Indeed, if the contiguous electromagnetic ∆ and ∆+1 gravitational scaling gives us a ’10ˆ10′ x 4 dimensions through which the force spread = 10ˆ40 difference between both forces, explain in depth in the analysis of the unification equation of forces and charges, here we must identify 2 ‘more’ jumps of fundamental planes of physical space-time, and postulate that through those 3 planes, the hierarchy problem of 10ˆ40 scales to 120:

The scales of the Universe, are those of the fifth dimension:

So the one we talk about is the lower, higher ∆±4 (dark energy, dark world, repulsive gravitation: expansive entropy-space, akin to the electromagnetic expansive waves between ‘galaxy-atoms’.)

The nested structure of the fractal Universe as seen from the ∆o thermodynamic scale of the human inner world.

Humans are in that sense the summit of a certain molecular game mostly belonging to gaseous light atoms (we are a mere 1-6,7,8 combination of a 100 scale). And as such only anthropomorphism makes us believe is the center of the game.

In the bottom we see the dark world beyond the diatomic and simple molecular clouds of hydrogen-galaxies, (ab. HG), the commonest observer in this region of the cosmos. In that sense, the scalar universe in nested format means that paradoxically larger structures of wholes are deeper in ∆-scales and so have as minimal quanta of space and curvature a smaller part.

in the dark world it seems to be the cosmological constant which is a measure of the curvature of cosmological space-time (∆-4).

Yet, our interest picks with the scales we observe, the next one, ∆±3 of particles till atoms of the inner world of galaxies. This scale is quite symmetric and we can treat galaxies as electronic nebulae around protonic top quark dark atom bcb black hoke frozen stars. This simple scheme of cosmology that best suits the rules of epistemology and truth implies that each galaxy atom with a positive black kerr hole of top ++ quarks, and a surface of negative strangelet electrons, with the softer mass-density of our stars in the middle, will be at cosmic level a predator-prey, information-entropy situation where ordinary matter will be the entropy of dark matter:

In the graph, we can see the solution of the vacuum catastrophe along with the solution of the hierarchy of forces:

Humans which are the first ‘scale where gravitational forces’ overcome thermodynamic ones (hence gravitational mechanics guides our motions more than temperature changes) is 10 scales up to the atomic electromagnetic scale, which multiplies for the canonical 4D models of relativity for a single space-time continuum explains the 10ˆ40 hierarchy problem between Q and G forces, which we easily unify with 5D metric.

Since the scaling is ‘lineal’ along the Sp-parameter, but a force spread long the 4 dimensions of a single space-time, we do have to multiply it by four.

On the other hand, the planck scale is in the 10¯³º range. So it is 3 times the 10ˆ40 hierarchy problem: 10¹²º hierarchy problem solved easily.

So *what the cosmological constant tells us that *we are in the ‘planck scale’, the scale of the cosmological constant, of the cosmos, of dark energy, of neutrinos… and theoretical strings; being neutrinos the known known stuff, and theoretical closed and open, time-like and space-like strings the theoretical stuff which we know to be truth but not real (and certainly needed a serious conceptual upgrade).

Indeed, the weak force angle of neutrinos gives us a theoretical value for them of the size of the planck scale, while particles such as the electron must be point-particles smaller than the probing 10ˆ-18…

So all would indicate really regardless of intermediate scales that in the largest 10ˆ9-11 jump of scales indicated in the above graph, we have the ‘human, lower gravitational 0 scale’, the atomic 10ˆ-10 scale, the particle 10ˆ-20 scale and the neutrino, planck, 10ˆ-30 scale.

Thus *the scale of the cosmological Sp- constant is the same that the scale of the neutrino Tiƒ particle. And that is really the most essential fact we have discovered. What though is the influence of this neutrino field. It is the graviton field? What is the weak force, which neutrinos carry? etc. etc. A lot of questions remain unanswered here and we shall try to fill them up this year 2017, as the first and second line are starting to resemble ‘something readable’. But when I don’t know, depends on the moods of the days. To state so far that:*

- No, the graviton is NOT the neutrino, but the planck mass, the micro-black hole of a compton length. No need to
*use any inflationary theory but accept facts that completely match theory and praxis. This are the micro-black holes that do NOT evaporate (sorry Mr. Hawking, you have ‘no idea’ of what time is and how information travels to the past – NOT energy, not certainly black holes) but are distributed all over the galaxy and form the fundamental gravitational field.* - No, the weak force is NOT a spatial force, but a temporal dimension, of ‘trans-form’ation of particle.
- And so the neutrino is a very curious type of ‘entity’,
*one that travels back and forth ‘across’ the 5th scalar dimension, moving energy and cyclical momentum between scales. And we shall leave it like that.*

Now the way to see this is the russian doll theories of wholes and parts:

LARGER WHOLES HAVE AS BASE-LINE OF ITS QUANTUM OF SPACE, THE SMALLISH REFLECTIVE – SCALES.

SO the dark cosmological energy scale must be served by the neutrino-string scale. And for that reason we find symmetries:

∆±4 dark energy, cosmic neutrino interstellar waves and strings, cosmological strings.

∆±3 atomic-particle symmetry with galaxy, black holes and stars.

∆±1 symmetry between molecular genetic dna and human memetics of human super organisms.

∆±0: human mind, cell

**∆-4: NEUTRINO PHYSICS: THE ∆-4 SCALE**

String theory is NICE but IS NOT worthy, beyond pure mathematical ‘literature’, as nice as quixot. And yes many cavalry men did walk on Spain but Quixot with it specifics none. Strings as are today described, NONE.

It is far MORE USEFUL to fully develop a Neutrino theory of the ∆-4 with laws isomorphic to those of ∆-3. So we DO have on the 2 sides of c-speed, faster than light neutrinos, which ‘trapped’ in the galaxy feeding light, become c-speed neutrinos but go much faster and according to scales, should have a mean speed of ‘10.000 beings’ that beautiful taoist insight, since particles that jump scales tend to be in the 1000-10.000 speed range. This is the light neutrino between interstellar galaxies, in which the red light decay.

The catch? *As we live in a relative Universe where speed is distance (remember the Galilean paradox); we can’t really know the distance between galaxies IF light decays in neutrino between them moving faster and then back into light entering galaxies.*

Do NOT raise your eyebrows, that is all over the place. You talk voice into a phone that translates into a c-speed motion your voice and then back into sound, and if you did not know the details you would think you were talking to a guy in the next room, as some thought in the earlier age of phones. So we cannot MEASURE THE SPEED OF NEUTRINOS BETWEEN GALAXIES, as scientists are hang up into a supposed c-speed/distance for them.

But alas, we do know something, which as usual (30 years of ‘Law of Silence’ on GST has given me 30 years of seeing how ALL sciences confirmed my predictions and none has contradicted it – NOT a single Popperian black swan – so my certitude is absolute on GST:

“How fast do quantum interactions happen? Faster than light, 10,000 times faster.

That’s what a team of physicists led by Juan Yin at the University of Science and Technology of China in Shanghai found in an experiment involving entangled photons, or photons that remain intimately connected, even when separated by vast distances.They wanted to see what would happen if you tried assigning a speed to what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.”

So alas, do NOT be shy with neutrino theory. If GST proves something is that ALL ENTITIES, ARE at least 10D (3 S TOPOLOGIES, 3 ages of time, 3 scales connected and a mind/will of survival shown in its 5 canonical actions). So THIS IS A BASIC CHANGE OF MIND-chip: you must always ascribe to each entity multiple ‘purposes’ one for each of those 10 connections.

Neutrinos thus, communicate as we said earlier in the post, light-beams, feed them, and are used to transport longtidunal, ‘basic-distance’ information, as a ‘first’ sentence of dialog that entangles particles, latter sharing much more information with frequency light:

Now in this 30 years old graph, we call ‘graviton’ the neutrino. This is NOT exact (too lazy to change old graphs). It is repulsive, entropic gravitation – the neutrino is the final death of mass. We shall deal with the ‘real graviton’, the microblack hole of the Planck mass, and the strangelet that matches it on the halo, and the true meaning of gravitation, an ∆+4 force (Mach was right, the inertia of cyclical accelerated centripetal motions comes from the larger scale of the galaxy vortex).

If you understand the nested nature of the Universe, in russian dolls, the connection is between the minimal entropic unit of dark energy (entropy in fact) and here we have elements to be analysed more seriously in the 3rd line, which are cosmological curvature (constant) on the ∆+4 scale and on the bottom line, the minimal component of reality known to us, the neutrino of the Planck scale.

*And in the same way non-euclidean (Klein model) relativity means we cannot reach the limit of c-speed in our plane and 0k entropy; in the scalar Universe the supœrganism we are in, we cannot reach smaller scales than Planck and larger than the cosmological almost null **curvature. But those are limits for the beings inside the Universe, as your cells cannot escape your body, and particles cannot in galaxies go faster than the c-spacetime.*

Again we are not doing here the huge maths. THE INFLATIONARY NATURE OF MODERN SCIENCE MEANS AS IN THE PARABLE OF EDDINGTON (MONKEYS TYPEWRITING WILL TYPEWRITE THE ENTIRE BRITANNICA:), just give them time, that all has been found, dig it. PROBLEM IS MODERN Monkey Scientific Lethaliensis (prior Homo Sapiens), HAS NO IDEA how to order the volumes it typewrites (-; That is what gst does. SO HERE, we have actually a very smart Monkey, Mr. Nottale, which has an excellent formalism for the idea of Non-euclidean limits in the ∆-scale relativity, which he rightly establishes on the ‘planck scale’ (but not on the neutrino) and on the cosmological. So just dig that if you are math-oriented.

In the graph, hyperbolic geometries have concepts of ∞ that work in the real Non-e universe: as close as it seems a limit (c-speed, h-planck scale), the space-time being will NEVER reach it, as there is an increasing difficulty, so you need growing energy to pass c-speed or go below Planck scales or above cosmological scales, the limits of your galaxy island-Universe and ∆±4 cosmos

**Neutrino & ¥ background radiation.**

Some theories to explore:

- Neutrinos creating light (neutrino theory of light)
- Neutrinos as waves something much smaller, the ‘quanta’ of ∆-4 scale of dark matter, the ‘ultimate’ atoms of space.
- Neutrinos as a scale above the planck scale of ‘strings’

As I said this is what ‘sound experimental truths’ known-known particles, GST aND THE CLOSEST formulation of it, in the beyond any visual evidence, real of the Planck Scale should be considered.

it is then when we can see that the existence of those strings upwards in 3 sub-scales would give it 3 x 3 +1 (the transverse in those equations) dimensions +1 (the whole)… 11 dimensional strings thus can create the ‘gluon fields of particles’, the neutron field of dark energy…

As I said, one day in the future if/when physicists, humans/or robots, in this or other similar planet do their job and systematise all that an astounding symmetry and beauty arise in the body of physics. Because of my ethical confrontation with physicists though and the epistemological p.o.v. of GST with man at its centres, this ‘∆±4 scales of reality would be studied long into the future’.

So let us consider just some philosophical/physical musings on this scale.

**The limiting intersection.**

We must be aware on this limit of any form of perception of reality 2 concepts explored in depth by these much vilified Mr. Eddington/Dirac, the theory of the big numbers, *which finds its full meaning on the scalar Universe; of *which we have merely resolved one scaling – that of the Cosmological constant; and we will consider one far more important – the unification of charges and masses but there of a few more to consider. For example, the scaling of the size and weight of an electron and a mean star (10ˆ60), which can be scaled in time also considering the frequency of a beta-decay and a nova star (as explored by the few ‘fringe physicists’ that dare to explore LNH). It is important also when dealing with such ‘numerologies’ to differentiate scaling from chance, in which eddington did fall at the end but not Dirac, to consider the *constant confusion in limiting physics of phenomena that is time-related but due to the speed of ∆-|>3| cycles, is seen as ‘a complete spatial cycle’.*

* *So for example Dirac’s far less maligned, relationship between a variable G and Time (G≈ 1/time of the Universe), does work in a different sense: The scale of the big bang is NOT the Universe but the galaxy (quasar big-bang as all evidence of BG is local, galactic, where light space-time and the ∆-3 scale works). And the relationship is NOT with time but with Space, co-related to the ‘expansion’ of space, that dilutes the central black hole ‘gravitational power’, and since that scaling did happen only at the beginning, during the ‘inflationary age’ of the central black hole cycle, and then diluted once the galaxy took its ‘steady state’ mature form, it is largely irrelevant.

Between two waters…

Eddington also noticed that on those remote scales, the mind, @, distorted our ∆ST analysis and so it must be really account for, which offended naive realism physicists thinking it denied their ‘supreme authority’, but of course it is truth. When Eddington in an honorable retreat on the importance of his science affirmed that biology is far more accurate, he was taking the uncertainty principle to its logic conclusion: IN AN ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE UNIVERSE indeed all scales are equally important, follow the sam laws, and so the humans cales matter more for being of positive human praxis and easier to observe.

On the other extreme there is neutrino physics, where Neutrinos MUST be understood not as a fully perceived single particle but as the upper limiting scale of maximal energy that ’emerges’ or ‘dissolves’ from ∆-4 (planck scale) into ours. As there is always a ‘huge’ range of social varieties of the fundamental Space-Time fields/waves/particles observed in each scale (so there is a huge range of molecular crystals, from ions to planets; of frequency waves from radio waves to ¥-burst).

So neutrinos as we describe them are the ‘planetary crystals’ of the Planck’s scale.

How neutrinos and ¥-rays relate to each other, in density? Standard cosmology makes a series of false assumptions – BG beyond the galaxy (it is only in the light space-time Universe. But we can get its model shrunk to the quasar cycle of the galaxy and then it all makes sense. So we can consider in 5D physics 2 different models.

The standard model that only analyses the galaxy; and the cosmological BG, which is neutrino dominant.

The radiation density *in the galaxy, where BG makes sense not in the cosmos *has two components: the present-day photon density ργ and the neutrino density ρν.

The photon density as a function of frequency can be derived directly from the CMB: the photon number density follows the Planck law. So with the current CMB temperature the neutrino density is related to the photon density by:

ρν=3.04678(4/11)ˆ4/3 ργ.

This relation can be derived from physics in the early galaxy, when neutrinos and photons were in thermal equilibrium.

What all this means really in 5D physics is that there is a quite remarkable ‘balance’ prey (neutrino field)-predator (light field made of neutrinos), 4.6/3.2 of ±1.5, in the earlier quasar bang of the galactic black hole and/or similar balances in explosions of novae and stars, which allows the theory of creation of light from two inverse neutrinos arrows, the use of neutrinos for communication between photons, and all other ‘scalar’ relationships we should find if theory is right and all scales follow similar behaviour, between the quanta of electrons (photons) and the denser particles of the next ‘scale’ of particles, near the planck scale.

In scale relativity, the cosmological constant is interpreted as a curvature. If one does a dimensional analysis, it is indeed the inverse of the square of a length.

**The cosmological constant.**

Dark energy can be considered as a measurement of the cosmological constant. In scale relativity, dark energy would come from a potential energy manifested by the fractal geometry of the universe at large scales, in the same way as the Newtonian potential is a manifestation of its curved geometry in general relativity.

So how dark energy, neutrinos with an angle equal to the planck’s length etc. etc. works out? In essence, as a curvature measure, the cosmological constant enters on the range of the G and Q curvature measures, albeit at an even smaller scale, so it is the equivalent of those equations and we plug it into our topological tiƒ constants right in.

**STRONG FORCE, QUARK SYSTEMS.**

**The Higgs field**

More speculatively, the Higgs field has also been proposed as the energy of the vacuum, which at the extreme energies of the first moments of the Big Bang caused the universe to be a kind of featureless symmetry of undifferentiated extremely high energy. In this kind of speculation, the single unified field of a Grand Unified Theory is identified as (or modeled upon) the Higgs field, and it is through successive symmetry breakings of the Higgs field or some similar field at phase transitions that the present universe’s known forces and fields arise.

The relationship (if any) between the Higgs field and the presently observed vacuum energy density of the universe has also come under scientific study. As observed, the present vacuum energy density is extremely close to zero, but the energy density expected from the Higgs field, supersymmetry, and other current theories are typically many orders of magnitude larger. It is unclear how these should be reconciled. This cosmological constant problem remains a further major unanswered problem in physics

.”All the matter particles are spin 1/2 fermions. All the force carriers are spin 1 bosons. Higgs particles are spin-0 bosons (scalars). The Higgs is neither matter nor force. The Higgs is just different.

There has been considerable scientific research on possible links between the Higgs field and the inflaton – a hypothetical field suggested as the explanation for the expansion of space during the first fraction of a second of the universe (known as the “inflationary epoch”). Some theories suggest that a fundamental scalar field might be responsible for this phenomenon; the Higgs field is such a field and therefore has led to papers analyzing whether it could also be the *inflaton* responsible for this exponential expansion of the universe during the Big Bang.

Such theories are highly tentative and face significant problems related to unitarity, but may be viable if combined with additional features such as large non-minimal coupling, a Brans–Dicke scalar, or other “new” physics, and have received treatments suggesting that Higgs inflation models are still of interest theoretically.** **

**Theoretical need for the Higgs**.

Gauge invariance is an important property of modern particle theories such as the Standard Model, partly due to its success in other areas of fundamental physics such as electromagnetism and the strong interaction (quantum chromodynamics). However, there were great difficulties in developing gauge theories for the weak nuclear force or a possible unified electroweak interaction. Fermions with a mass term would violate gauge symmetry and therefore cannot be gauge invariant. (This can be seen by examining the Dirac Lagrangian for a fermion in terms of left and right handed components; we find none of the spin-half particles could ever flip helicity as required for mass, so they must be massless.)

W and Z bosons are observed to have mass, but a boson mass term contains terms, which clearly depend on the choice of gauge and therefore these masses too cannot be gauge invariant. Therefore it seems that *none* of the standard model fermions *or* bosons could “begin” with mass as an inbuilt property except by abandoning gauge invariance. If gauge invariance were to be retained, then these particles had to be acquiring their mass by some other mechanism or interaction.

Additionally, whatever was giving these particles their mass, had to not “break” gauge invariance as the basis for other parts of the theories where it worked well, *and* had to not require or predict unexpected massless particles and long-range forces (seemingly an inevitable consequence of __Goldstone’s theorem__) which did not actually seem to exist in nature.

In the Standard Model, the mass term arising from the Dirac Lagrangian for any fermion is THE PRODUCT OF THE PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE SYMMETRY.

Now in 5D physics, this is the MOMENT OF DEATH of a particle, when it BECOMES ‘PAST-MASS’, and so it emerges into the larger social whole.

It is a completely DIFFERENT perspective. But the maths are the same. The particle and antiparticle, chiral right and left, completing a cycle of mass, break its symmetry=die, to emerge into a larger plane ∆+1 of the dark world. It enters into the larger world of black holes and top quarks.

Physicists, as they have NO CLUE on the life-death world cycle of particles merely realize that it implies the flipping of particle chirality.

So death becomes an abstract ‘non-sense’ by lack of understanding of the particle-antiparticle antisymmetry explained latter in this post and the next one…

The top quark interacts primarily by the strong interaction, but can only decay through the weak force. It decays to a W boson and either a bottom quark (most frequently), a strange quark, or, on the rarest of occasions, a down quark. The Standard Model predicts its mean lifetime to be roughly 5×10−25 s.

This is about a twentieth of the timescale for strong interactions, and therefore it does not form hadrons, giving physicists a unique opportunity to study a “bare” quark (all other quarks hadronize, meaning that they combine with other quarks to form hadrons, and can only be observed as such).

Of today’s available theories to describe the self-similarity of both fields, the most accurate is the Brans-Dicke gravity theory, which extends Einstein’s gravitation to all its scales. In the 4th line of detailed analysis, or for anyone who wants to explore further the physical mathematics of 5D, IT IS the theory of General Relativity for a finite number of scales, making by varying the G-curvature (as we did in the simplified Newtonian model of charges), equivalent any of the forces of the Universe, truly unifying gravitation and the strong field, and hence the top quark vortices and black hole ‘wholes’ made of them:

*
*In

*Physical Review*in the 50s Brans and Dicke established its parallelism with a strong gravitational force. What the graph means is that we must fuse the strong field of quarks and the gravitational field. The strong field emerges as the gravitational field when we vary the universal constant. We have done that in simple terms using Newtonian vortices. Two Americans, Brans and Dicke, did it with equations of relativity, obtaining a mathematical field self-similar to Nambu’s equations for a deconfined strong field of top quarks (

*left*, our weak matter;

*right*, a strong field of top quarks, which breaks our symmetry, converting us into quark matter).

Mass and gravitation are perfectly understood with Einstein-Brans theory, a modified version of Einstein’s work, which introduced the concept of a variable gravitational constant, a fact proved today also by fractal theory.

In our simple Newtonian description of those mass vortices, it means that we can fuse also the gravitation and strong field, which happens to be 100 times stronger than a charge and 1041 stronger than the gravitational field. Thus, we can relate the strength of their universal constants:

*G (gravitational constant) = 1039 Coulomb/charge constant = 1041 quark/strong constant*

Thus, strong forces are 102 stronger than our weak ones and 1041 stronger than the gravitational one.* And since black holes will be made in all the self-similar theories that describe at quantum level a strong gravitational world, all those theories including the simple vortices described here are telling us that quarks will make black holes.*

*Now, it must be clear enough that top quarks and black holes are not components of the light space-time universe, but of the 10-z cosmic membrane, as any mass is an accelerated vortex of gravitation which beyond the c-speed event horizon keeps accelerating beyond the human scale.*

Of all those theories, the less appealing is the Higgs one.

This is due to the fact that what quantum physicists do is merely repeat the same theory, the original electromagnetic theory that explains how particles interact in electromagnetic space, exchanging particles between them. But this happens because light is a spatial energetic force with no cyclical, temporal, informative mass. So it has spatial parity, it happens in space, and the exchange is extremely fast. But what quantum physicists ignore because they ignore all about physical information is that there are forces that happen in time because they are cyclical forces, which don’t exchange energy but transform energy into information, cyclical mass. The main of those forces is the weak force, which therefore is not a spatial force, reason why it does not keep the parity/spatial symmetry of other forces.

It does happen in a same point of space but in a long period of time. It is mediated by a constant *G*, which is measured in m-2, mass/time parameters, lasts a long time, and happens in the smallest range, in the same point of space-time. Thus, this force is completely strange to them because as long as they don’t have a proper theory of mass/information/cyclical time clocks, they won’t be able to understand at all a “transformative” force, like the weak force. They started well, as Feynman and Gell-Mann described the force as happening in a single point of space, in a long period of time, evolving our lighter particles in heavier quarks (with an intermediate state called the Z and W particle). Or inversely the force showed how heavier particles decayed into lighter ones.

Yet then came Goldstone and Higgs and tried to explain those forces as electromagnetic spatial forces, just because that is how they describe light. And so Higgs defined the scalar, lineal, not cyclical, state of the super-strong field of top quarks; which is its decay mode:* *

What this means is obvious. The Higgs is a redundant equation that describes just a specific electroweak reaction that transforms neutrons and protons into heavier quarks through an intermediate Z, W states, as our particles speed up in cyclical vortices of mass, warping further into fractal dimensions of form, and finally produce top/antitop quarks, which have in this manner killed our matter. And because the transformation or inverse decay is not an exchange of energy in space but a growth or loss of dimensional form in time, it does not keep its “mirror” parity in space.

Parity means that in spatial events it is the same going left or right, but in time events, as Einstein said, “wires don’t travel to the past.” So a time event, a weak interaction, doesn’t keep its parity; it is not the same going forward (evolving information) then backward (devolving information into energy). Yet to explain why the weak force doesn’t keep parity is impossible without a proper theory of the two arrows of time, reason why quantum physicists have not been able to do it for forty years and we can do it here with simple, logic explanations.

Thus, any attempt to create the Higgs=top will mean nothing for science, but it will mean a lot for mankind: the death of our matter, which in a runaway reaction will mean our death. This will happen according to standard science over 8–10 TeV. That is, it will happen in the experiments of 2013.

Lee Smolin found and proved twenty years ago that in fact, Higgs’s equations and Nambu’s equations, which preceded him, and Einstein-Brans equations which preceded both, are self-similar fields with a variable G-constant.6 Now the fractal paradigm makes all that also “logic” and furthermore solves the true question that all those theories tried to solve: *why the weak, temporal, informative force breaks parity, the symmetry of space. Because it is not a spatial force but a temporal, informative force, which evolves or devolves particles between the two fractal membranes of the Universe, the world of electroweak forces and the world of strong gravitation.*

The reader must understand indeed what two fractal membranes mean: certain particles belong to the membrane of dark cosmological matter in different scales and others to the electroweak scales. And the weak force evolves them or devolves them between membranes.

Which one belongs to which membrane is easy to deduce by their self-similar parameters:

The 2 membranes are built with different pieces.

**The nature of dark matter.**

The big-bang explained as the big-bang of the lower scale of the 5th dimension below the cosmos, is a quasar big-bang of a galaxy, either the previous cycle of the milky way galaxy, or the explosion of a giant galaxy in the local cluster, from where the local group fed on to reproduce the Andromeda and Milky way and dwarf galaxies around it.

A quasar big-bang we shall prove eliminates all those errors, the background becomes local and hence does not break Lorentz invariance (relativity), the galaxy has the same density of matter needed for the big-bang, a quasar is a reversal black hole explosion which happens to be the exact equation of the big bang (also a reversal black hole metric equation) the age of the quasar cycle tabulated between 10 and 20 billion years is exactly the same than the big-bang, it is NOT an illogic theory, as there are infinite galaxies in an infinite Universe the abundance of helium in galaxies does happen more in the center around the black hole where the hadron epoch formed them, and the ages of the big-bang do apply all to a quasar big-bang, and the local measure of the background radiation which FIRST and for very long was considered the background radiation of only the galaxy, fits, and as we shall see in the next picture, in fact the map of the galaxy is exactly the dame of the background radiation:

The equations of mathematical physics are extraordinarily simple and its quantitative relationships too, when we do not become obsessed as computer scientists today with complete exactitude, due to their worldly professions (military physics that require precise targets and electronics that imply very subtle nanometric measures of the paths of logic electrons). This is not the goal of a general philosophy of science in search of synthesis and whys. So we can do basic quantitative analysis as we shall do without extreme precision, which others can reach in detailed’4th line analyses.

Let us in that sense put two simple examples of 2 decades predictions, one of which has been corroborated and the other unfortunately will either by experience or by human extinction to the nuclear industry. Both concern the nature of dark matter, today’s main unknown of astrophysics.

Now, the Linguistic method makes the fundamental guides of research the isomorphisms of nature, which ARE 4 structural elements, organic co-existence of 3 Planes of 5D in all systems, which means we do have to find cut-off atomic or particle substances to ‘mathematical entelechies’ such as black holes and dark matter (as Einstein wanted, since he always was ‘strong’ on the scientific method and its deterministic truths, so he always affirmed he would not ‘believe’ in black holes till its cut off substance was found).

This symmetry between the parts and the whole, coupled with the symmetry of the 3 ‘families’ of mass of increasing density (ud, sc, tb quarks), which form in the lower scale the 3 social planes of evolution of mass, and the symmetry of the 3 regions of the galaxy, the ultra dense small center, which has the same equation in 5D than the quark center of atoms, the ud-region of stars and the dense, gravitational halo, establishes an immediate correspondence between the 3 families of quarks and the 3 regions of the galaxy, making:

– Black holes top quark stars, since top quarks are the only cut-off substance, which has the same parameters of density than black holes, becoming both the ‘doors’ to the next larger ∆±4 plane of the 5th dimension beyond galaxies, and as such will be studied in 5D physics.

– ud-stars the ‘mitochondria’ of the galaxy as an organism, in charge of reproducing its light matter and atoms.

– Strangelets in its stable configuration at 0 pressure (dibaryons, usd-usd atoms) the substance of the Halo, as Nature and hence the galaxy is SYMMETRIC in 5D ternary planes, 3 ages-families of quarks and 3 spatial, organic regions.

It is thus simple to resolve in all its beauty the generator equation of the galaxy in those terms:

Sp(∆+1:Halo=∑Œ:Strangelets=∑œ-1:usd-dibaryons)> ST:(∆+1: star arms=∑Œ:stars=∑œ-1:u-d-e-plasma&atoms)> To (∆+1: Central Black holes=∑Œ: Nova holes’: ∑∑œ-1:top quarks) <<Death: quasar explosion…

… of the central black hole after devouring the entire galaxy, running backwards its equations into a local big-bang with its canonical ages (decay of tops into strange quarks, formation of strangelet halo in the quark epoch, decay of remnant quarks into hadrons, reabsorption of photons, and emission of background radiation, formation of stars and back to the 3 ages of galaxies, etc. etc.

Now this is the Generator Equation across the 3 symmetries of 3 Planes of existence of the 5th dimension, 3 ages of Time (families of quarks of growing informative density) and 3 Spatial organic regions of the Galaxy, BASED IN THE 3+0 fundamental isomorphisms of all systems of nature, equal to any other structure of the Universe, including a human being.

And once this is established T.Œ does study in inverse fashion its elements, starting from the higher scale (galaxy) and the whole structure in 5D (organic properties), down to its spatial configurations its 3 ages and its lower parts, INTERSECTING quantitative analysis of its Universal constants, both internal (Sp/Tƒ, Tƒ/Sp internal densities of energy and information, Sp=Tƒ balanced dynamic metabolism) and external between the entity and its lower fields and upper informative wholes, or constants of action ( Sp+1/Sp/Sp-1 ∆æ: motions and accelerations, and so on and so on).

What T.Œ gives to the researcher is the generator of the system, and its fundamental symmetries. And those are OBVIOUS for galaxies and matter. As there is NO EVIDENCE OF any other substance or SUSY or WIMP particle in the Universe as it should NOT exist in a minimalist, efficient, simple, symmetric, perfectly organized Universe.

Why we are so sure of that generator equation? Simple, because we cant write you one similar generator for any species of the universe, including you, or humanity in the larger scale of evolution as a single species (with its 3 horizons of Australopithecus, Erectus and sapiens), and so on and so on. This is the beauty of TŒ, Everything is defined by the generator, which explains a superorganism and its world cycle. Point.

And that is that, and it does not matter that the human ego-trip of lesser scientists, wannabe Saint Nobels of the Dynamite, company-mothers of machines and weapons, CERN included, want to spend fortunes fabricating here strangelets and black holes that in due time will blow us all, to prove cuckoo mathematical fantaphysics of concocted particles that do not exist anywhere.

Now once this is understood of course we can do mathematical calculus to prove every other relationship of quantitative nature on that structure. And we shall do them in very simplified numbers, as others might with supercomputers. This is not our task, specially when I consider humanism and the human mind above the chip and one of my purposes on my 30 years of T.Œ research was to show the nerds of the chip radiation that a human still can get more meaning with his logic bran that a team of wannabe geniuses through his computer algorithms.

So to the point. Strangelets will be the dark matter of the halo, as that is the symmetry and their role, or else STRANGE quarks do not exist. What quantitative proof we have? Simple.

An atom of a strangelet usd, has 10 times more mass than an atom of light matter, hence strangelet were produced in the quark epoch in the same proportion that ud will be produced, the Halo MUST weight 10 times more than the light matter, and alas! that is exactly the proportion: 90% of the matter is in the halo, 9% in the stars and 1% in the central black hole. How simple is that? As simple as it gets.

Of course now once we have deduced the simplest possible truths with first principles (The Œ=mc2 method of truth, the linguistic and logic reasoning and the 3 symmetries of 5D space-time and its generator equation) we can get as complex in the details as we want, which is the only Thing astrophysicists of the previous paradigm can do, observing and crunching numbers not to explain much of it.

So in the deluded cosmic big-bang (not the real quasar big-bang), they describe the same epochs of the Black hole running backwards its equations of collapse of matter into top quark stars, now decaying forwards in time into its entropic death, as it spills its ultra dense matter that decays into light matter.

Since the big bang is nothing but the reverse explosion of a quasar black hole (origin of the enteral cycle of the galaxy, equivalent to the beta decay of a neutron into a proton and its inverse slow collapse of the electron back into the proton).

Thus in that reversed entropy, the quark-gluon soup went through a phase of usd atomic soup (through the canonical decay path):

t -> b -> c -> s -> u <-> d

Now, this decay is already studied in accelerators and while the first 3 quarks decay extremely fast, in 10-12, the strange quarks lingers 10.000 times, 10-8, more than enough time to form on the initial conditions strangelet atoms in a similar proportion to those up and down atoms created after the photon reabsorption (when the so-called background radiation produced 300.000 years after the quasar explosion).

It is the so called quark epoch when those strangelet atoms stable at zero pressure lead the ‘wave’ towards the external membrane of the future galaxy, slowing down and forming the halo.

The quark epoch began approximately 10−12 seconds after the Big Bang, when the preceding electroweak epoch ended as the electroweak interaction separated into the weak interaction and electromagnetism. During the quark epoch the universe was filled with a dense, hot quark–gluon plasma, containing quarks, leptons and their antiparticles. Collisions between particles were too energetic to allow quarks to combine into mesons or baryons. The quark epoch ended when the universe was about 10−6 seconds old, when the average energy of particle interactions had fallen below the binding energy of hadrons. The following period, when quarks became confined within hadrons, is known as the hadron epoch.

But at this time since the period of decay of the Strange quark is so slow at 10-8, an enormous number of usd-usd stable dibaryons had been formed. It is in fact called strange quark because its long life defied all the a priori calculus of our researchers. Then at the end of the quark epoch the left over strange quarks decayed into up quarks that started to form the hadrons of the intermediate region that will form stars

__The proportion of dark matter__

Now we have use the organic point of view. Let us use the ‘mental point of view’ to calculate the dark matter of the universe, from an ‘Einsteinian perspective’, that is using the observer-observable paradox and the structure in networks with ‘dark holes’ of all 5D Œ-points. Namely, the Universe is like a game of cat alleys, in which each species see only the network of neurons or cells with whom it communicates.

We are as humans connected to people, friends and family and workers and our mass-media gurus, politicos, etc. that is to our reproductive, energetic & informative, parallel ‘cells-citizens’ and NOT to the rest, which become invisible to us (witness LA 60% majority of Latinos completely invisible to the white dominant group). So happens in the interaction between electronic light space-time and the gravitational invisible plane).

What this essentially means is that electrons communicate with electrons (the way they do through photons which explains all the paradoxes of quantum physics and recasts special relativity in 5D physics is studied somewhere else), forming a network defined by the 4th postulate of ¬Æ, as a web with dark holes which are not perceived where the parallel Universe of dark matter threads. How can we calculate the proportion between them?

Again we shall consider the utmost simplest calculation possible based in the simplest of all vital space-time beings of the Universe: a bidimensional being with a perfect cyclical time membrane, storing a disk space, according to the simplest Universal constant, Pi, whose meaning should be perhaps obvious to the reader who has gotten so far: a pi sphere is an SE>Tƒ system of 3 lineal diameters turning around a time cycle of 3 ‘ages-motions’, which therefore leaves π-3=014 apertures for the central o-point of the system to perceive the external Universe.

The simplest of those systems is in fact the smallest quanta of the light space-time Universe, h-Planck constant, which in 5D physics, we call a Planckton, the minimal vital space-time being, as its parameters (energy x time) clearly show.

This, which is sooo obvious, escaped for a century quantum physicists, from the idealist metalinguistic Germanic school that brought us into deluded fantasies of self-importance including 2 world wars. A Planckton is the minimal unit measure of a fractal species of spatial energy and temporal information, the minimal unit of the scale of light space-time. Point.

Its equation is therefore obvious, in its 3 simpler symmetries:

Sp: As a wave of energy in a lineal state: Sp x Tƒ = H (Einstein’s equation usually written as E=hƒ);.

ST: as a particle-wave in its intermediate state: H= P(particle momentum) x Wavelength (De Broglie equation)

Tƒ: h=h/2π radians, or minimal unit of angular momentum of the spin of the particle, which is its perceptive, informative state.

So what mystery there is to quantum physics? None. The Planckton is its finitesimal, as the Plankton is the finitesimal of the chain of beings of sea life that feeds from the smallest krill to the largest whale. And so quantitatively you can calculate in terms of planckton or plankton units of energy, all the space-time actions of both ‘planes of the 5th dimension’.

This said, the Planckton or light or electron, ternary social scales of our relative informative world are self-evident: œ-1: ∑∑Plancktons=∑Œ: light (E=hv) = ∆+1: Electron (nebulae of dense fractal photons)

Hence ultimately as we measure planckton in units of angular momentum (mvr) its h spin state is merely a pi cycle surrounding the central p.o.v. which is observing the Universe from its radius o-point while its membrane traces with angular momentum an mvr motion, which is what we measure (as the halo does with its strangelet membrane that stores the overwhelmingly majority of the angular momentum of the galaxy, since r is maximal and mass too).

Now how much it observes; as the 2 pi radians turn around? And by extension how much any disk-like galaxy observes in the larger homeomorphic scale of galactic atoms as its halo turns around?

It is easy to calculate: the apertures are 0.14, the membrane covers 3 diameters, so they cover 3/π=95%, and leave 5% of reality observed through the disk-plane of the planckton.

In the case of the disk-like galaxy, though, the composition of the Halo (external membrane), will also respond very likely to the same space-time perfect, simplest entity.

And since we are inside the galaxy, and systems within a larger whole tend not to perceive from its cover, more than a 5% of its ‘pi’ membrane according to the most general formula of the dark space-time of an Œ relative eye-world: r/π=95%, which happens to be the calculated dark (matter+energy) of the Universe.

I recall to have sent this in a brief note to Nature, 25 years ago, along a simplified model of the bidimensional holographic space-time Universe. Of course they did not even acknowledge the reception. And yet a few years latter they calculated that dark matter and energy (transversal gravitational waves) were 95%.

And then they calculated that the Universe was of course a plane, with the flat galaxy on it, as they were looking through the plane and the apertures of the plane. It is the rest of the non-perceivable Universe filled with galaxies like ours? How many of them they are? 5D cosmology is of course only in its beginnings. That is, it is a ‘point that is a whole world in the mind f the scientist that discovered it’ (Planck on his solitude during its earlier quantum years).

As he said a generation of researchers have to die before a new paradigm takes over, but the problem is that we might become a strangelet of the halo and all die, leaving not researchers to take over, if the Big-bang experiments of primitive physicists of the Abrahamic-Military-lineal religion of physics keep going on strong.

Now the reason we need to add the organic whole view to the present analytical mathematical physics only vision of reality is obvious. The analytic view only studies the small scale motions of beings, the first of the 5 actions of existence, translation in space. By reducing our knowledge of galaxies to mechanical motions we simply falsify the entire field, reducing it to the pseudo-religious dogmas of our technological civilization and anthropomorphic religion of man as the center of the Universe, now in ‘informative safe’, that is as the only sentient, intelligent, living species in the ‘chain of beings’, between God, the upper entity that created us within the Universe with the proper constants to make it for us (anthropic principle) in an act of creationism.

** THE BLACK HOLE AS A TOP QUARK STAR. ITS DEATH INTO BIG-BANG**

Now, the Gravitational Dark World beyond galaxies is not perceivable, so I agree all what we must say might be considered speculative.

Yet in as much as the Dark World is what the new ‘race’ of accelerators will be exploring we need to consider it in more detail.

Essentially the dark world is the constant world beyond c-speed in space quanta, Sp, and T<o in Tƒ, in temporal frequency.

Thus it is the world beyond c-speed, which in Einstein’s equations, implies either negative mass, negative energy or back to the past in time. This is the preferred solution to simplify equations in 5D astrophysics, though obviously implies a motion in time back a quanta to reach action at distance, as the system that travels to the past, seems simultaneous in the present. Its tachyon equations are direct from the use of the Klein-Gordon formalism for a tachyon system of spin zero (no information in our world), at instantaneous present speed, which we seem to see as infinite:

V=Sp/Tƒ->0 V->Sp/o=∞ action at distance.

If we use Einstein’s formalism, as time is now negative passed the c->T=0 barrier of Lorentz transformations, the factor of contraction of speed now ads: 1-(s/-t)²/c²= 1+(v/c)².

Thus all the parameters that on one side of the c-barrier were decreasing start to grow and vice-versa. We thus obtain at both sides of the constant of present c-speed a relative past and future world which cancel each other, inside the atom-galaxy (<c >oTk) and a outside the atom galaxy (inside the black hole, which connects both), beyond the strangelet halo of c-speed turning quarks.

This is the dark world, which gives us two solutions to the Klein-Gordon equation: one with higher momentum than energy and one with higher energy than momentum.

The solutions are the neutrino and Higgs boson, which become therefore the two ‘tachyon’ elements of the dark world.

And so since T.Œ, theoretically has no limit on the minimal time clocks of information and smallest space-time of the Universe, we can keep postulate such scales, but obviously there is no interest beyond the dark world, which as far as we observe reaches the cosmic horizon and beyond.

Now the local Universe is ‘too small’ to form a single space-time scale of reality of the ‘size’ of the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale.

This does not fully eliminate a possible local big-bang, of the galaxy-atoms of our neighbourhood but more likely of the scale of a ‘gas explosion’ of a few moles or change of state. We could be just a bit of liquid nitrogen evaporating fast.

**The big-bang as death of a physical Sp≈Tƒ organism.**

Let us then study reality merely as it seems – born out of a series of beta-decays, that is local big-bangs of galactic neutrons, and use T.Œ in 5D for what is worth – to compare the processes of the different organic scales of matter, and the first thing we must explain is the dual nature of a big-bang as an entropic death which ‘kills a present’ system and breaks its Sp ≈ Tƒ harmony, into a dual big bang.

And so we have said and will keep saying a lot of this phase, since HERE IS WHERE THE REAL BIG-BANG STARTS, IN THE DUAL DEATH OF THE BLACK HOLE:

In this first age, the Galaxy’s black hole died in an explosion of- gravitational waves (the equivalent to neutrino waves in the beta decay and nova explosion, latter considered in more detail), whose enormous energy moved forward the top quarks of the galaxy, decaying fast into strange quarks, which are the only stable heavy quarks at vacuum pressure, forming the atoms of dark matter called dibaryons (Usd-usd hexaquarks).

We are dealing here with the strongest most stable combination of quarks, as the hexagon is a perfect bidimensional pi-closed form of space, where a 3=6 radius diameter, can close completely a ‘geodesic’ elliptical halo, protecting as proteins protect the cell, the galaxy from external influences.

This is the cover of dark mater of the galaxy in perfect symmetry between its 3 families of mass and its 3 organic parts, latter studied in more detail.

For the cosmic atom it would be a much faster process, hypothesized to arise from cosmic inflation, a faster-than-light expansion just after the big Bang – only that we do NOT have the particles that could do that, because the top quark has enough job to expand a black hole with its neutrino, high energy wave and its front of fast decaying top-bottom-charm-Stable strangelet dibaryons, to the size of the galaxy.

The numbers do NOT work for further, faster, expansion. And 5D physics DO NOT speculate. It is a simple, efficient, minimalist theory of reality constructed only with available particles.

Now, we have recently discovered a ttt particle of 700 plus GB, which physicists are clueless about, ignoring what it is, but it has all the aspect of being a triplet top quark, which I prophesized 20 years ago would be the central ‘boson’ substance of the black hole, ‘gas-9’.

In this phase, the quark gluon liquid didn’t cool as physicists think (they still call it plasma 🙂 but exactly the opposite since the little-bang is the DEATH of a black hole of perfect order into entropy, so all is exactly the other way around as the experiments at CERN are constantly proving.

And so it is now when the first ± c-speed symmetry creation NOT symmetry breaking takes place, separating the interior of the galaxy-atom at < c speed, from the interior of the remaining ‘proton’-black hole, smaller than the original neutron-hyper black hole, with the strange quark halo, rotating at relative c-speed in each small strangelet vortex, acting as the protein that isolates the galaxy, and causes the ‘solidity’ of the whole galaxy which – physicists still observe with awe – does NOT work as an unconnected spiral, but thanks to that 96% of dark matter, ahs the exact rigidity of any organic solid system, from a cell to your liquid organism surrounded b a hard solid membrane-skin.

in the graph, all systems follow the same developmental ages. The explosion of the big-bang which will feed a new galaxy according to the cycle of ‘barred galaxies’ as ours, implies an inflationary age of expansion of the ‘membrane’, which through gravitational waves with a halo of strange quarks and a background of ‘neutrinos’ would fast expand the dark matter heavy membrane to the limits of the galaxy, while the slower front of electromagnetic radiation, which does not penetrate so fast, would go behind, leaving as it progresses and cools down a process of confinement of lighter quarks into hadrons and nucleons.

Ahead, the Higgs, faster than light boson (or rather ‘above’) as the explosion would split perpendicular ‘faster than like, asymmetric jets’, and planar waves of matter in different fashion, given the different polarization of neutrino waves and electromagnetic ones, would push away the remnant energy.

However cosmologists invent a…

**Quark-antiquark Period?**

So next, without understanding the past-future duality of quarks-antiquarks, cosmologists thought the universe, which consisted mostly of energy in the form of neutrinos and __photons given__ the enormous energy density of the big bang of the black hole, the cosmos-galaxy would exist as a collection of quarks and antiquarks along with their exchange particles, a state which has been described as a “superhot plasma of anti-quarks and quarks, annihilating”. This time period is estimated at 10^{-32} seconds to 10^{-5} seconds, which would provoke through that annihilation another big bang (cosmology is full of big explosions).

Now 20 years ago, when I first copyrighted 5D physics I affirmed it would be a quark-gluon cold superfluid soup, a perfect time vortex of under zero temperature, since:

– Temperature is a measure of entropic disorder applied only to this side of the universe and to thermodynamic, molecular world.

– Inside the black hole there is a top quark star in solid or superfluid states of boson perfect form.

– The anti-quark is the death moment of the quark that last only a second and so it is not the state of the anti-atom entropic big-bang which would produce a massive wave of quarks, decaying from top into dibaryon strangelets that would form the halo.

And here is where 5d physics proved itself in 2008 when they made a perfect liquid at RHIC.

But then I sued the entre global community of physicists, because next they could provoke a strangelet ice-9 reaction and blow up the Earth. So I never was accepted in any forum of physicists again.

**∆-1: PARTICLE SCALE: STRANGELETS AND TOPLETS.**

In the next graph we can see how this dark, gluon-top quark soup (toplet liquid) of a gas-9 reaction (black hole quasar explosion), neatly reclassifies properly the 3 families of increasing mass in the Universe:

In the graph, a first look at the reordering of the strange and top quark triangles of mass, to define the symmetry between the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales of ‘atoms and galaxies’, in terms of its ∆-1 components (quarks).

To fully understand the previous graph, you should consult the next post on atoms, as quarks fully correspond there. We have already treated in the introduction to this post, the analysis of the ternary symmetry between ∆-1 quarks and ∆+1 parts of the galaxy;

∆+1: top quarks->To: Galactic black holes, ∆-strange quark: Sæ: galactic halo, ∆-1: Ud quarks (our matter): ST-galactic stars.

Now, in this system, it is necessary to understand the role of the Higgs field and top quarks, which conform the outside-the-galaxy dark matter and dark energy.

**G-WAVES.**

now it is fundamental to understand that gravitons do NOT EXIST on the sense given by physicists – as the attractive gauging particle between physical masses, but gravitomagnetic transversal waves of neutrinos do exist and are essential to the structure of galaxies and solar systems.

THIS IS THE SOLUTION to the conundrum put up before on the ‘neutrino 1/2 spin’ vs. the graviton 2 spin. Simple: neutrinos are the equivalent in the next cosmic scale of the 5th dimension of an electromagnetic repulsive wave of ‘dark energy-repulsive gravitation’.

The neutrino theory of light, as the pilot-wave theory and the particle-wave duality is the work of De broglie, brutally assaulted by the Bohr gang who took their work as theirs and misinterpreted. A neutrino is the ’emerging’ flow of entropic communication between two atoms, or atom-galaxies, which either goes the entropic way, dissolving-stretching space-time into action at distance and disappears without trace of information: V=s/t=s/0=∞.

Or is not in an open ‘domain’ but constrained in its two limiting ends by the two atoms/galaxies it communicates and then, this condition (to be guided and controlled by two point-particles at their ends, *is the only condition needed for two inverse neutrinos, with inverse motion, that is, one emitted by particle a and the other by particle b in a communicating act: *

Fermion < neutrino+Neutrino>Fermion

for a light boson that ‘warps’ pure gravitational action at distance space-time giving it form information to exist. So neutrinos do form light-beams and do dissolve them. And that is another beautiful thought of De Broglie on the path of truth in science: economicity, simplicity and causality.

As we have shown the symmetry of scale between atoms with positive quarks and negative electrons, and galaxies with positive black hole top quark stars and negative strangelet halos ad nauseam, it follows now that dark energy waves will be just the equivalent created by dark energy flows which acquire form between galaxies. The math of it are more or less complex but as we REPEAT ad nauseam, the beauty of the fractal, organic, vital, topological= mathematical universe, is that we can explain it much simpler and intuitively using the concept of symmetries between scales and organic properties and the laws of the scientific method of truth (economicity, simplicity etc.) as long as in the background we use sound-sound mathematical theories (as the neutrino light, providing they are indeed as Jordan proved, exactly inverse neutrinos constrained in its ends – by the particles that use them to entangle and communicate). So we do not need you to be a math-addict, just trust me, i read physics, love maths and only use sound-sound theories of the Universe, *unlike we must say many of our fantaphysicists these days.*

So there must be G-waves of dark entropy and dark faster than c gravitation in the upper scale between galaxy atoms; and between (at light speed constrained by the galaxy inner structure) stars and planets and black holes and starts.

Whereas c is the limit of motion WITHIN THE GALACTIC VORTEX, AND HENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES WITHIN GALAXIES, BUT NOT BEYOND THEM.

The unknown limit of human perception is the metric point of 0 information and ∞ speed, from where we obtain our entropy of motion; beyond the ∆-3 scale of pixel perception. It is the neutrino background, or dark energy of expansive death of c-light speeds; of repulsive gravitation, which goes beyond c, with negative mass; a fact stubbornly denied against evidence in physics. Indeed, neutrinos used to be always calculated as negative masses till ‘adjustments’ on the ‘error’≈bias introduced by theoretical dogma corrected those experiments. Indeed, *all measures of mass before this century gave a faster than c, negative energy-mass, meaning they are tachions of the ∆-4 dark energy, repulsive gravitation, pure entropic scale:*

*In the graph, neutrinos have consistently being measured to have negative masses and faster than c-speed, corroborating the models of 5D physics, and yet systematically scientists deny their own experiments to uphold the fantasy of a single scale of space-time where c speed is the limit and mass is always positive. Yet beyond the galaxy, c-speed is the lower limit, gravitation repulsive and a vortex of mass an explosive process of entropic, negative mass destruction.*

**The negative number question, solution and imaginary numbers.**

Next come the question of negative solutions to those equations, what truly they mean? As we explain in number theory, Euler’s vision of them as inverse numbers is the proper meaning. *So they do exist, which has clear consequences in areas such as relativity where negative mass, means only an entropic process of expansion of mass into entropy.. I.e:*

E=mc2 does not mean energy (really entropy in this case), is mass, as mass is in the other ‘inverse side’ of the equation.

So the real equality happens when m moves to the same side of E:

e =

-mc²

Which defines negative mass as an expansive entropic destruction of mass. And so in relativity the 2 solutions which can be put as an example of the 2 roots of quadratic equations (one discharged in processes that are social and accumulative):

In graphs, Space time distortion is common method proposed for hyperluminal travel. Such space-time contortions would enable another staple of science fiction as well: faster-than-light travel.

Warp drive might appear to violate Einstein’s special theory of relativity. But special relativity says that you cannot outrun a light signal in a fair race in which you and the signal follow the same route. When space-time is warped, it might be possible to beat a light signal by taking a different route, a shortcut.

The contraction of space-time in front of the bubble and the expansion behind it create such a shortcut.

Within the tube, superluminal travel in one direction is possible. During the outbound journey at sublight speed, a spaceship crew would create such a tube.

Like warp bubbles, it involves negative entropy, which again would be just in the previous equations to move, E to the mc² side, increasing its density.

Almost every faster than light travel requires negative energies to be implemented at a very large densities. And so there is nothing special about it.

In the graph we can see how negative mass breaks the c-speed barrier very much as a ‘sound barrier’ is breaking provoking an empty shock wave without ‘light space-time’, torn out as the mass slides in the lower faster than c speed scale of invisible gravitation with no information, becoming coded as a neutrino wave, which might collapse back thanks to its negative energy, resurfacing far more advanced back to the ∆-3, light scale.

Now because gravitation is the inverse, lower, upper scales to that of light space-time, in the Universal game of russian dolls, the main example of “Negative” Energy is precisely when the quantum scale or the macroscopic scale is close to the ∆±4 world, in the quantum potential field of a particle moving >c (Bohm’s model of quantum mechanics) and in the ∆+4 region near a strong gravitational field:

– Radial electric or magnetic fields if theirtension were infinitesimally larger,for a given energy density.

Squeezed quantum states of the electromagnetic field and other squeezed quantum fields.

Gravitationally squeezed vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy.

In general, the local energy density in quantum field theory can benegative due to quantum coherence effects.

Other examples that have been studied are Dirac field states: the superposition of two single particle electron states and thesuperposition of two multi-electron-positron states. In the former(latter), the energy densities can be negative when two single (multi-) particle states have the same number of electrons (electrons and positrons) or when one state has one more electron (electron-positron pair) than the other.

Since the laws of quantum field theory place no strong restrictions on negative energies and fluxes, then it is possible to produce violation of the second law of thermodynamics, and time machines at a local level, which is what GST precludes.

**Modern neutrino measures confirm v>c; m<0**

In the graph ‘again’ we measured faster than light speed, but the meak, peanut dogmatic brain of modern children of thought caused such fuss among idolaters of 4D that the experiment was considered ‘again’ faulty and a cable blamed. The neutrino thus always moves as all its space-time sheet v≥c, while light exists on the other side v≤c, touching each other on the c-scale in which they exchange entropy and information, as neutrinos give birth slowing down into ≈0-mass to a photon, or rather tunnelling from -0 to +0 mass, around the ‘asymptotic, infinite carrier of c-speed.

**THE DARK ENERGY SCALE: BEYOND C**

** **The lowest scale known in the Universe is the h-planck ‘neutrino’ scale of dark energy, expansive gravitation, which therefore has according to *experimental evidence and the metric of the 5th dimension, negative mass (as negative is merely in a dynamic Universe the inverse value, so since mass is an implosive vortex, negative mass is an entropic, explosive vortex), and faster than c speed, as 5D metric implies smaller scales with lesser information have higher speed.*

Hence the invisibility (less information), non-locality (faster than c-speed) and expansive nature of interstellar space, the scale of the Universe in which the neutrino background dominates.

It is then obvious *that testing a negative mass and faster than c-speed motion for neutrinos will mean the proof of the 5th dimension metric, right? Wrong.*

Because in the present age of ‘fantaphysics’, data is NOT taken as seriously as abstract theory, since Neutrino was detected there have been an enormous number of tests in which it gave negative mass and faster than light speed, and every time, experimenters have denied it, to uphold the single space-time continuum 4D only metric Universe.

Indeed the last time the Opera case (graph), which provoked such outrage among the physicists believers that after two positive experiments, in a short of coup d’etat, to protect their careers the experimenters denied themselves and ‘magically accused ‘a loose cable’ of making twice the wrong measures (:

IT IS A CASE, similar to the inverse case of big-bang dogma, which accumulates so many cases of falsity that it is a shame to talk of it as science.

** Unfortunately **Inflationary information plagues the idealist school of physics that studies the invisible scales, due to the lack of a ‘general model of the fractal Universe with the isomorphic ‘allowed laws’ and the limits TO mathematical *HOMOLOGIC METHODS*.

WITHOUT a serious philosophy of truth and the understanding of ¬Æ, everything then is OK, because on top a fancy Computer model will make it look nice and real. Yet as Einstein put it not all what is mathematical truth is real. And certainly the *imagination of the digital mind is NOT necessarily truth, even if ‘virtual computer reality’ looks ‘so real’. *

So what we can know about the scales beyond our perception? A lot can be inferred in a ‘detective inquire’ which however MUST OBEY AN ABSOLUTE LIMIT OF TRUTH:

*‘Science must not occupy itself on equations and themes of which there is NOT any evidence whatsoever’ Einstein.*

This is completely denied by ‘practitioners’ of fantaphysics, equipped with Craig computer simulations. So we must limit completely and ignore soundly most of what they do; specially those huge extensions of ‘local facts’ to ‘global symmetries’, to pump up the importance of self-discovery – including the cosmic big-bang instead of the quasar big-bang, based in a projection to infinity in space and time of a local measure (Hubble constant, time-back to the past explosion) string theory without ‘limitations’ and understanding of its essential concepts: open entropic strings, cyclical, closed time strings, and ST-present vibrating strings; dimensions (of time and space), etc.

Once GST clarifies those concepts… It is then when the isomorphism of the Universe, allow us to study the scale beyond perception on the Planck limit of theoretical physics, of which ‘a lot can be said’ with ‘certain certainty ‘ if *we use GST to limit what theories are real and what are mere mathematical truths.*