In the Fourth Line, we study in greater detail each Plane of Existence of the Humind’s perceived Universe between the invisible force of ∆-4 gravitation and the hardly perceived ∆+4 galactic cosmos.
We do so unlike in the first and second line, where we first explained the spatial super organisms as a whole structure made of pentalogic elements, ¬ entropic limits, Spatial topologies, Temporal ages, ternary scales and a linguistic mind, performing its actions of survival and then studied in a scientific classic jargon, the nested scalar supœrganisms of human stiences, decreasing in size and complexity (Galatom, Earth in its 3 ages, as Gaia>History>Metal-earth, Humans, its minds, and the minds of the Universe and its mathematical, logic and organic languages), with a more detailed temporal analysis strictu senso, by describing the 3 main þlacental palingenetic cycle, ∃xistential lifecycle and §ocial worldcycles all those super organisms live through between birth and extinction or the very rare transcendental worldcycle of resurrection, through the Ðisomorphic method; which means to study, the 3 scales and worldcycles of each being, self-centered in its relative ∆º seed-mind:
Thus 2 closed and open world cycles suffice for most species to close its zero sum, including æntropic man that shows little capacity to go beyond its cycle of life and death, to organize an immortal History as an efficient superorganism.
We subdivide them as the graph explains in 5Ð¹² ‘elements’, highlighted through the 3 worldcycles of Placental evolution, existential life cycle and social world, explained in detail in further sub-posts time permitted (or for future researchers to complete), as we run in a dynamic sequential form the 3 worldcycles of the system, first seeded by a parental system, as an informative still seed, which will follow the immanent program of existence, reproduce with the available energy, evolve and emerge from its ‘generator’ cycle as a larger whole, a 1, part of a relative,
∞ world where it will perform its 5 Dimotions=actions of vital existence to survive through the complex Dimotions of present iterative reproduction, and future evolution, in a social world of scales, which improves its chances as part of a larger whole, till entropy sets and the organism dies… but might resurrect partially in the memories of its genes and memes or even become a transcendental mind of a longer Cycle and larger Superorganism.
Thus in the 3rd line we studied in detail the ’12 Disomorphic set of properties’ of all beings, with different levels of entangled, ¡logic analysis, and examples from physical, biologic and social systems.
While the fourth line will enunciate them for each main species of each main scale, widening its analysis as I see fit, within my limited lifecycle and dwindling interest.
Secondary subposts that might study specific organic species and worldcycles in mind, time, space actions and scales.
We shall thus in this post summarize the 5Ð¹²¡somorphisms and 3 worldcycles of the quantum potential scale, of which we know little, but ‘Imagine’ to be formed of a background of neutrinos at the Planck scale.
So we first introduce in this post the ‘Imaginary’ 3×4=12 Ðisomorphisms that conform the lowest of all scales with whom the human mind interacts to perform the simplest of all actions, locomotion, through the force of ∆-4 gravitation.
It might be done in purely theoretical terms as an analysis of string theory, but in its present background dependent formulation is of little use to 5D.
To say that WE DO NOT KNOW what the cosmos is, beyond the similarity between galaxies and atoms, or rather anti-atoms, due to the ‘Higgs’ processes within Black Stars (former black holes), which ‘decay’ Into antiparticles in larger measure when becoming BCB atoms of the toplet decuplet… studied in our article of the 5 Dimotions=Forces of the galatom, and the internal structure and evolution of black stars (former black atoms:)
This said, we can be just by homology and partial knowledge fairly safe when considering that what we know of the ∆±4 plane, networks of galaxies, still follows the systemic nature of the Universe, and what we should deduce from the entropic expansive space between them, points to neutrinos as the background space-time, of the cosmological constant as its constant of curvature=speed and the neutrino theory of light, as the way in which neutrinos become the ∆-4 quantum potential scale feeding light, whereas neutrinos have ‘spin’ hence are made of an H-planckton form.
THIS WE deduce, the maths we shall just quote.
Let us then consider the few things we know of the…
∆-4: PARTICLE STATE: NEUTRINO
“(Gravitational) Time tells matter how to move; electromagnetic matter tells space how to curve≈form.” Wheeler, on how the two scales and states of reality: motion=time and form=space in the gravitational, ∆±4 and electromagnetic, ∆±3 scales.
Beyond the limits of full human perception, (cosmos, dark entropy scales) we can only ‘guess’ some properties and isomorphisms.
Gender duality. Sp vs. Ti differentiation. Evolution of its species:
Gravitons or ‘cyclical-time strings’ will be the ð-informative class, lineal energetic gravitation, its |-energy.
G is its main constant, studied in detail when we consider its parallelism and unification equation with charges.
5th Disomorphism. WORLDCYCLE of THE NEUTRINO SCALE
Gravitons or ‘cyclical-time strings’ will be the ð-informative class, lineal energetic gravitation, its |-energy.
Evolution: Neutrino theory of light.
Dissolution: Beta decay of ∆-3 into ∆-4 neutrino waves.
Evolution: Neutrino mediated weak forces.
Dark Energy: expansive, cosmological gravitation
Now those scales are the inner gravitational and outer scales of the Universe. So it is useful to remember its structure as mirror symmetries between the top quark and black hole planes.
1st isomorphism: space-time dualities: ∑E=S, ∑t=O
The system’s Space and Time components, which are also its Energy and Information, as Space is a fixed vision of the energy quanta that make a system, and information a still vision of time cycles that carry it in the frequency and form of those cycles.
So we identify the main elements and plane of existence of a system and consider its ‘gender varieties (lineal energy=male, cyclical information=female’ and Se<i>To symmetries.
2nd Isomorphism: Its S=T metrics.
The ‘metric’, Scalar Space-time Generator equation which describes all i=ts Space-time dimensions and isomorphic planes: i±4=SexTo.
3rd Isomorphism. Its 3 organs/networks: $t≤ ∑∏≥§ð
Existential Constants: C(∑S,∏ T,i±4,5A)
Next, we study the system quantitatively, through its Constants of Action, its Social Constants and its Space-time symmetries, all of them determined by the ratios of exchange of energy and information between its PSD elements. This is the most mathematical detailed analysis after the qualitative understanding of all the elements of the being.
5th Isomorphism: Its actions: ∆(Ai-4; Oi-3;Ei-2, Ri-I, Si)
Thus now we can easily describe its main 5 actions derived by those Dimensional components across its i±4 planes of existence: ∆Ai-4 (acceleration of motion), ∆Oi-3 (perception), ∆Ei-2 (feeding), ∆Ri-1 (Repetition), ∆Si (social union)¹.
6th Isomorphism: Species Creative diversification: 1,2,3,4.
We show now the processes of creation and diversification of a given species. We study its gender dualities and its topological varieties caused by STe,r,o differentiation and the coding 4 numbers of its ‘eros’ actions.
7th Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: [Max.E x Min. I > E=I > Max. I x Min. O]∑i>i+1
8th isomorphism. Its world I±1;
We find its internal hierarchical social class structure and exchanges of energy and information among its i±1 ‘willing’ scales (the cellular/atomic i-1 plane, the i-ndividual and i+1, social/cosmic plane, where the being exists and which remains co-invariant through its inter-actions. So we analyse the closest world around it, through the perpendicularity and parallel laws of Non-Euclidean geometry’s ‘3rd postulate’ of similarity.
10th isomorphism. Social scales. S10
Finally we consider the last phase of its evolution which is social – for the most advances species, which transcend into a higher i- plane of existence through S10=(3×3+i)¹° scales.
9th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: i±4
Its actions allows to study its i-4, motion, i-3, information pixels, i-2, energy quanta, i-1 seminal seeds, Si, social scales, I+1 super organism, I+2 world and that’s about it. We do not really care for its i+3 galaxy (-: and beyond. And so now that we have it almost all said, we define the PsD structure of the being, with its specific generator equation in which the whole is represented, with all the previous data. This generator equation completes our understanding of the being.
11th isomorphism: Transcendence into its higher plane. Neutrino theory of light
Broglie’s theory of light made of two neutrinos, ‘coupling’ in the inverse gender point to give birth to light is its transcendental theory.
It is left to study the alpha and omega, the 0 and 11th isomorphism: the point of the mind, site of the will, which orders the system internally in its ∑i-1 parts and perceives it as an i-whole, part of its I+1 society. The topological center of a sphere, which can according to Poincare’s conjecture represent without deformation its whole world in the infinitesimal fractal, non-Euclidean mind point.
The STP isomorphisms of strings.
String theory explains the smallest physical scales. Further on it MUST be corrected in its formalism to make them background dependent as strings ARE space-time.
Then they show the key 5D Isomorphisms, the ∞ of i-scales and the Galilean Paradox; but we shall not deal with them in its complexity as they are not perceivable. As in the case of Neutrinos just consider a couple of disomorphisms in more detail.
1st isomorphism: space-time dualities: ∑E=S, ∑t=O
– Their length is proportional to its energy: ∑E=S (Galilean Px.)
–They are 2 motions mutating into each other: To- cycles (closed strings) & Se-lineal motions (open strings). Hence they prove the topological, functional Isomorphism in 2 Dimensions (Cyclical and lineal forms).
2nd Isomorphism: Its 3 organic/networks: : STe≤ STr≥STo
There are 3 varieties: O-closed, |-open and its vibrating combinations that reproduce laterally (Str).
3rd Isomorphism. Existential Constants: C(∑S,∏ T,i±4,5A)
Strings are mathematical objects, defined by basic mathematical constants and operators
5th Isomorphism: Its 5 actions : ∆(Ai-4; Oi-3;Ei-2, Ri-1, Si)
They are actions vibrating in 4±i modes:,
∆Ai-4: they move lineally.
∆Oi-3:They form closed cycles
∆Ei-2: They form lines of energy.
∆ Ri-1:They reproduce laterally, ∆exo, creating planes or cyclical tubes in social motions.
∆ Si: They create i+1 structures: bosons & quarks.
7th Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: [Max.E x Min. I > E=I > Max. I x Min. O]∑i>i+1
Strings evolve socially, and likely they also evolved from a planar Universe, (max. E) into cyclical forms (Max.O) and vibrating modes (ExO)
8th isomorphism. Its world: 1,2,3
.i±1; i<-1, particles made of membranes (D-Branes) made of single strings, attached to the membrane as energy cilia are to a cell form a ternary system.
10th isomorphism. Social scales. S10
They gather together creating enormous string bundles that originate relative i+1 membranes and i+2 particles.
9th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: i±4
They exist in 3 main i±1 planes: as single i-1 strings, as social ∑i-1=i membranes and as ∏i=i+1=social particles
The 10 or 26 dimensions of strings are the inner scales of a fractal point that seen from our world shows only ±i=1 dimension of lineal or cyclical motion. So 10D fermion string theories are equivalent to the 3x3i±1, Se dimensions of most entities studied in 5D metrics from a spatial p.o.v. and the To=33i =27±1=26 dimensions of bosonic strings, those of most entities studied with a Time p.o.v. as bosons are To-forms and fermions, Se-forms.
Strings prove the infinity of scales, as there are hypothetical, self-similar to cosmic strings of galactic size…
11th isomorphism: Transcendence. Strings are supposed to the be the minimal units of all particles, in which they finally ‘transcend’.
A simple pi circle can already be a 0-point. So 3 lineal strings and a cyclical one can form an organic system – a π-cycle acting as an organic membrane, made of 3 unitary ‘open strings’ with 3 x 0.05D ≈ 0,15 apertures for a total π-perimeter. This π-membrane receives external, imploding vibrations of energy, which it transmits to its internal space, through its 3 apertures as a broken Cantor dust: 3 bits from the external world that finally stop as a still image in its center, creating the zero point; thus forming an organic topology with 3 canonical parts: the external membrane, the toroid whose cycles transform energy into form till reaching the static zero point that integrates the flows into a mind.
This is its ‘life-informing’ arrow. Or in the inverse direction, the zero point or membrane can grow finally expanding in a big-bang vibration, dying away. This simplest structure has already all the Isomorphisms of the 5th dimension, and it’s a model to study many self-similar properties of more complex Universe. An example: How much external space the 0-point sees? If it has ≈ 0,15 apertures in a π-perimeter, it sees 0,15/π of outer reality ≈ 4%, leaving 96% of the Universe out of its perception as dark space. It is the same proportion of dark matter & energy our ¥-eye 0-point doesn’t perceive of the Cosmic, gravitational, lower scale – solving the mystery of dark matter.
We shall in the future introduce all those Disomorphisms in detail. Only one ‘advance’ is needed now… To consider the mechanism of faster than c-travel in both the quantum and cosmological realm.
8TH D¡: A LOWER WORLD OF BACKGROUND NEUTRINO RADIATION.
One of the hypothesis of 5D physics is the fundamental role that must play neutrinos by sheer rational evidence, as the gravitational quanta of the gravitational transversal wave structure of the universe. AS IT is simple enough we can bring it here just for fun.
The theoretical difficulty being the 2-spin prediction of quantum gravitational theories based in 2 assumptions not completely hold in 5D physics – the conservation of spin (which in 5D physics might be transformed in upper or lower forms of rotational momentum, conserved only through 3 planes of the 5th dimension, as they become inverted in its emergence in upper planes), which allows to create a model of 2-spin neutrinos as gravitons or inversely the assumption that gravitons do NOT have 2 spin (or rather are made of 4 neutrinos, lineal strings of one dimension, which become the 4 component of a field that forms a complex doublet of spin ½ with the peculiarity observed that both neutrinos and antineutrinos have longitudinal polarization of positive spin.
The mathematics of the model are somewhat complex but essentially mean that neutrinos ARE VERY important, almost as multi-faceted as light space-time is – couldn’t be otherwise as they are the other 2nd background space-time network of the galactic universe. So as nervous and blood systems do have multiple roles in your body neutrinos and photons share all the networks roles of the galaxy.
They do have therefore both boson and fermion ‘nature’ as the weak force they mediate.
This means that we can put neutrinos and antineutrinos together in and 4-doublets, as if they were bosons. Then:
– 2 gravitational tachyon neutrino strings, when put together in pairs of opposite direction form the up and down, particle and antiparticle sides of the magnetic light wave-field.
– When communicated between particles, the fixed distance in gravitational space that allows the sharing of information between the particles at fixed c-speed.
– When colliding with neutrons they catalyze the beta decay, as well as other weak force transformations, in a role similar to the one mediated by the Higgs boson on the top quark faster triplet of heavier quarks.
– When emitted massively and constantly by all type of cosmic bodies the origin of the 3 ‘G’ ‘giant electromagnetic waves’ of the gravitational scale, which form the different transversal wavelengths that order in ternary symmetries the structure of solar systems and galaxies.
Those transversal waves are the only of the many roles of the Neutrino ‘fantaphysics’ (: I confess neutrino gravitational string physics is the only speculative part of 5D Physics of which I have not yet by lack of evidence put my firm on blood), which we will discuss here.
Essentially there are 3 neutrinos which constantly oscillate as they abandon the cosmic bodies that constantly reproduce them in proportions often higher than the photon radiation, forming 3 basic type of gravitational transversal waves, whose combinations allow us to model galaxies and its spiral arms and rotary orbits of stars in the wells of those waves. The same neutrinos structure the lows of planetary waves, and so we can recognize clearly in ternary symmetries a 0.33 short wave of neutrinos of higher energy that crosses the planet crystal centers provoking the well-known Fe-Co-Ni chain of reactions that puts on ‘fire’ the internal energy engine of planets. A longer 5 A.U. wave exists also clearly as it allows to put on its nodes the main ‘Jupiter like planets’.
And finally there should be an even longer neutrino wave that will put in connection stars among them.
In the next graph we see the 3 oscillatory neutrino waves observed together coming out of the sun:
Gravitational, transversal, fractal waves shape the structure of galaxies and solar systems, transferring form and Entropy between cosmological bodies, in a self-similar process to the transference of information and Entropy between atoms through electromagnetic waves. In the graph, Titius Law of distances between planets reflects their position in the nodal points of those transversal gravitational waves. In the core of planets, there could be a crystalline or super-fluid zone where those flows of dark, gravitational Entropy are processed, causing flows of heat and matter that make planets ‘grow’.
Below we observe the oscillations of neutrino waves.
Now the 5D model of astrophysics, implies that there are also transversal repulsive gravitational waves, which do account for many of the structures of the Universe, starting by the expansion perceived in intergalactic space-time. This is just the expansion produced by any lineal electromagnetic wave of any range, now in the cosmic scale. Moreover, black holes produce two type of wave-shift that compensates each other and explains why the total space-time of the Universe remains constant:
- When a wave of light enters the black hole it ‘blue shifts’ imploding space into higher frequency/density of energy-mass. But this effect is NOT seen obviously from far away as it is the inner production of mass within the galaxy.
- When the wave leaves a black hole region it redshifts that explains the initial red shifting of light as it leaves the galaxy towards us
So the hypothesis is clear.
Somewhat neutrino waves, of the hipouniverse, which have as a lower limit the speed of light and an upper unknown limit as tachyons, theoretically, if they are the field force between galaxies up to c=100 z, gather in ginormous numbers, allowing the stretching in the ∆+4 symmetric hyperUniverse.
According to this ∆-4,5 reality above us we can then consider that the stretching reveals either gravitation as having a ‘slower’ speed on the ‘glass of light of the galaxy’, as light has slower speeds on ‘glasses of solids’, and neutrinos becoming the stretching particle of the ∆-4 intergalactic field to 100 c-distances/speeds, or neutrinos becoming something ‘else’ (dark entropy), at the halo of strangelets (dark matter wit ten’s hypothesis candidate to the ternary symmetry between quark masses and regions of the galaxy (top quark stars=’dna’ black holes, strangelets=’protein’ MACHOs, ud-matter: internal star ‘mitochondria’).
THE DARK ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE AND ITS NON-LOCAL TRAVEL TO THE PAST.
Let us consider this misterious force between galatoms, THE so called dark entropy, which IS exactly in all its properties equal to the electromagnetic force between atoms. It is expansive, keeping them at distance… starts from a ‘high frequency’, expands in the middle and ‘collapses’ when it arrives to the next atom-galaxy.And what puzzles more scientists; as galaxies-atoms distance from each other, more ‘dark energy=electormagnetism’ appears, because of course, the ‘central proton-black hole’ keeps vibrating through its magnetic/polar-Kerr axis (which physicists found to move at non-local, ‘infinite’ speed, so it can escape the black hole).
So the dark entropy mystery is resolved. But what about the non-local force. This requires to understand that in cyclical time there is always AN ENTROPIC SOLUTION OF TRAVELS TO THE PAST. This paragraph from the more specialized post on ‘time travels’ will clarify it:
In the deepest understanding of time, we say that the ‘lower scales’ of parts is in the relative past, as the whole must be built over the past parts, and the whole larger world is therefore in the relative future, while in between the ‘organism’ is the relative present.
This might sound strange to you but as we are talking of relative local parts and wholes, the fact that the parts are the relative past and the whole the relative future does NOT affect other parts and wholes, so it is POSSIBLE TO TRAVEL locally in time, within the super organism. And further on because time is ultimately as all clocks are cyclical, there is a section of the cycle which is inverse and so we talk of the moment of ‘entropic death’ as a travel back to the past.
The deepest understanding of the Universe which is a fractal OF TIME-motion, not of space-form (the static Maya of the sense, the language, the mirror, the mind that stops reality), comes then when we fully account for the different motions from past to future and future to past in each local system, for its cycles, synchronicities and co-existences.
One example will suffice: Maxwell’s electromagnetic radiation has 2 solutions in time. One that travels to the past called the collapsing wave, and one that travels to the future called the expansive wave. Einstein insisted all his life without knowing how to solve the conundrum that the 2 solutions were real. Physicists ended up discharging the solution of ‘traveling to the past’, in which the ‘wave collapsed’. Then Feynman calculated that IF THE TWO SOLUTIONS WERE REAL, both cancelled each other to create light as an ETERNAL present. This is indeed the case. The co-existence of ‘past’, ‘shrinking waves of light’, (traveling to the ¡-1 plane) and future, expansive spatial waves (traveling to the ¡+1 scale) cancel to the create a ‘constant light speed’ in present, which is the background spacetime of our galaxy.
So we have a general equation, studied in depth in our articles of time that relate, scales and time states to create a simultaneous super organism in present:
Past (smaller parts, entropy-death dissolving motions) x Future (informative particles/heads arrows) = Present (repetitive body-waves).
This also works for minds. Researchers realized that the body seems to ‘act’ before we detect the ‘thoughts’ that actually causes the motion of the body. It is a huge mystery. How the ∆º body networks of the ∆-1 cells can act ‘before’ the ∆+1 mind that makes it act gives the order?
Because in the fractal Universe of different arrows of time from past to future, future to past, and present to present, the 3 co-exist displaced in time. You must imagine the co-existing scales, as OCCUPYING THE SAME PLACE IN SPACE, BUT HAVING A ‘LATITUDE’ FROM PAST TO FUTURE IN TIME. So as the next graph illustrates, the Future whole sends a message to the past parts, and the scientist that measures the process in the ‘co-existing present’, sees FIRST the reaction of the ‘past’ body-cells and then sees the ‘future firing’ an electromagnetic MESSAGE from the ‘waves of the brain’ THROUGH its nervous system, such as this travel from future to past, which lasts a time v=s/t (motion duration) is cancelled by the ‘interval from future to past jumped by the message’ ‘-t’, so -t + t = 0, the 3 scales co-exist synchronically in present, and so the cells, the networks and the head-mind move together without ‘dislocating’. Internally they have a time latitude from past parts to future brain, externally they seem a co-existing present.
But for the simplex humind and its concept of an absolute LINEAL TIME from past to FUTURE only, it all seems as the past parts determine the future whole – human mind (remember humans beyond their egocy – ego+idiocy – are far less intelligent than the Universe, as we HAVE A SINGLE ARROW OF TIME CONSCIOUSNESS in the mind).
If you extend this concept to every other ‘science’ and scale things start to fall into place. For example, GRAVITATION seems no local, but it is in fact an informative language, sent from the future to the past by the ‘brain of galaxies’ = black holes. And those gravitational waves create non-local, instantaneous gravitation as it happens with electromagnetism between atoms but at the larger cosmological scale, so all seems an eternal present.
So the proper explanation of non-local QUANTUM POTENTIALS, in the De Broglie>Bohm realist models of quantum physics and the cosmological models of gravitation (or rather ‘cosmological electromagnetism as we have seen) is also simple:
A travel from future larger waves to smaller collapsing particles balances the past to future ‘time’ v=s/t spent in the travel to create an eternal simultaneous ‘background spacetime present’, either light over gravitational waves in galaxies, or dark entropy between them.
In the graph, the quantum potential of non-local electromagnetism and gravitation in the cosmological scale – an eternal present over which the electromagnetic wave travels as long as it does it TOWARDS ITS COLLAPSE as a particle of a lower plane than the larger wave. It is an essential component of 5D quantum physics.
Religious beliefs vs. realist stience
‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …
But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982.)
We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego.
The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.
Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is.
It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it.
Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so, humans will.
Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm.
But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state.
Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, the only hidden variables on the argument between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudo-religious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed not-evident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from wave-format to particle-field state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wave-present state or past-future field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism.
So by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light space-time (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together, GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations.
The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so.
I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long.
So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the big-bang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (big-bang), in space (quantum-cosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, A-men.
We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.
Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.
How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.
Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.
Uncertainty, non-locality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity.
There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: non-locality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality:
- It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.
11th DISOMORPHISM: NEUTRINO’S THEORY OF LIGHT.
SP: NEUTRINO AND LIGHT BACKGROUND
SP: Background Radiation: Basal Temperature of the Galaxy
As any system can go in more detail, by looking closer to its fractal parts, we can go deeper and deeper in the analysis of the whys (biologic and topologic), whens (mathematical and metric), how/who (Logic) and what (experimental) questions of knowledge. Let us consider thus in more depth just one of all the elements of the galaxy studied here – the organic role of the background radiation – the water of the galaxy…
The background radiation coincides with the radiation of a black body at 2.7 K degrees. Since in Non-Euclidean topology any fractal point is a black body; that is, a point with minimal apertures to the external world, a galaxy will only emit background radiation through its Halo, in which background holes will redshift light at 2.7 K. Thus the galaxy surrounded by a halo of quark, dark matter can be considered a black body emitting at present time as an isothermal organism does a background radiation, whose organic function is to maintain a homogenous temperature, similar to the organic temperature of living beings and ecosystems, kept by its water. Thus, the background radiation acts as the cytoplasmic Entropy of galaxies with 3 functions:
– Max.Es: It provides Entropy to its bigger, colder Worm Holes and its super fluid helium structures (not treated in this introduction to complex cosmology). Both happen to have a temperature slightly lower than the background radiation from where they can extract Entropy.
– Es=It: It acts as the membrane limit, between the gravitational and electromagnetic membrane, within the galaxy, separating both worlds. It maintains also an isothermal temperature, as any organic system maintains a stable temperature.
– Max.It: It establishes a fixed frame of reference for the galaxy, allowing the process of information and measure, location and communication defined by Gauge Theories.
The background radiation is the ‘Entropy soup’, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, its Worm Holes; as the hot water of the cell allows RNA molecules to move, kicking left and right water molecules with its COOH legs. Indeed, we know that only organic systems have a homogenous temperature. For example, humans have a homogeneous temperature within the limits of liquid water. So the 2.7 K homogenous background radiation reinforces the organic hypothesis.
Quark matter is the top predator form of the galaxy; hence they are the entities, which, as the elephant on the savannah or man on Earth, or aerobic bacteria in the earlier planet, have redesigned the galaxy with their organic activity. In Gaia, water, the equivalent to that background radiation, maintains a stable temperature, thanks to the feeding, energetic activities of its life organisms that avoid abrupt climatic changes. Without aerobic life the Earth would be like Venus – a planet with extreme temperature changes. Now it is almost isothermal. So happens to your body which has 36.5 degrees all your life, due to your organic activity as a water organism with 2 networks, a warmer blood and a colder, nervous, informative system.
So happens to the galaxy, in which the basal temperature of the background radiation separates the ultra-cold world of Worm Holes and dark, gravitational matter and the hot world of atoms and radiant matter, allowing the exchange of Entropy and information between the 2 physiological networks that structure the galaxy.
Recap. Background radiation is the Entropy soup, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, Worm Holes.
A case of study: neutrinos as the baseline of photons.
Next, a key insight I want to convey from this introductory notes are clear:
– Neutrinos MUST be worked out, as the only particle with no ternary roles in the Universe at this stage to occupy a fundamental role in several scales of the universe or else they would NOT exist in such huge numbers. Neutrino physics in that sense is the most IMPORTANT field left to explore at this stage. As it has several properties which are coincidental with the roles required to describe the next scale of the Universe, that of quantum gravitational, dark energy and dark matter beyond the known-known level of galaxies.
My take is that neutrinos are NOT the quantum of gravitation as Bohrians think, because it is NOT needed, Albertians are right, attraction in gravitation HAPPENS because of the curvature around a MASSIVE central point of view (which makes almost indifferent for most calculus the other mass).
Only when A and B are similar in mass, there is a relationship of linearity and quantum gauging When one point dominates the other in mass-size and force there is not. And most gravitation systems around a sun, a black hole is of that kind.
Neutrinos do act NOT as forces but as communicators of information about distances.
They are hence similar to strings, in fact of the same minimal length – the Unit of LENGTH of the Galactic universe, and thus the ‘structural element’ constantly produced and radiated that webs a, background independent space, related to the ‘magnetic part’ of the light rays, they form together, as neutrino and antineutrino, reason why they are the only particles with left-handed or right handed singlet structure so they will ALWAYS neutrino + antineutrino, back and forth, form a perfect, planar, longitudinal fixed distance between two particles to start communication between them.
This communication will then be realized by the electric field created by the articles above it,
From an action point of view, they can be seen as the ∆e ‘food’ of H-Planck light quanta, and first c- ‘space line’ traced in the communication of particles, the tending of the cables of gravitation and hence also the quanta of transversal gravitational waves, latter studied in more detail. All those roles are possible within different theories of neutrinos but none is fully and well developed (neutrino theory of light, being the key to them. But only as the origin of the magnetic field of light born of two of those neutrinos, which add up the 1 spin of the photon).
Next we must understand neutrino oscillation, growing in mass, from a practical zero-mass till collapsing into a mass particle of the 3 Neutrinos generation – the tau which will be correspondingly much more massive (as Top and Tau quarks-electrons are). So they START UP many reactions, when they collide with particles.
And finally we must give it all the importance as in II-type supernovae they are the bursts of energy when those stars become black holes to form the underlying quanta of gravitational waves, but obviously not attractive but repulsive, quasar –like, nova like transversal gravitational waves –t he fronts of the big-bangs of all scales that carry the energy, repulsive dark energy waves, complemented perpendicularly by the ‘Higgs field’ much more massive scalar hyper luminal waves.
As Big bangs ARE as all systems that die, a broken SYMMETRY of two fields that created, Sp x Tƒ the system and now split perpendicularity as all the pictures of death of stars show – not chaotic explosions but cutting in two of the head-particle/field-entropy elements of the system, no longer in harmony.
Hence the ‘angle of the spins’ of the weak bosons, which merely says they angle upwards through the polar axis, while the wave of neutrinos explodes in all directions, without clear direction as the burst of energy.
This directional DUALITY of explosions of matter hardly understood is what explains the NEED for two particles the neutrino, almost massless and the W± Z H bosons with huge mass.
By all this I mean several neutrino ROLES are needed to complete 5D physics with Majorana neutrinos (neutrinos in which the particle and antiparticle are the same), which have mass and must be so far according to the general laws of T.œ, the gravitons of the transversal gravitational waves.
There might be outside galaxies faster than light neutrinos – something, which in the future would be easy to observe if we perceive a neutrino wave before the light wave of a supernova from far away galaxies.
Now essentially if neutrinos as all seems to indicate do have mass, are equal to their antiparticle and have boson qualities with ½ spin, their maths will be really fun. And I promise to get seriously pedantic with them on the 4th line (-;
Those neutrinos will be the feeding space strings for light beams (theory of neutrinos as origin of light fashionable in the 30s, and worked out by Jordan, Born, De Broglie and Fermi among others).
And any physicists could work out the details for those roles with some not so difficult modifications on the concept of a graviton.
In simple terms, neutrinos have the size of strings (measured in its weak angle scattering); and 2 inverse neutrinos moving back and forth between particles could act as bosons with 1 spin, and give birth to a light single polarized photon. Neutrinos are hyper abundant and with a minimalist mass, could account for the underlying structure of galaxies as ‘organisms’ with a formal structure since unlike planets stars do not move at different speeds but maintain the inner form of the ‘galacell’.
So the proper understanding of neutrinos as the ‘base’ over which light transits in the galaxy and the 3 families of masses as the components of its 3 Sp<ST>Tƒ organic parts, would put together all the points of view and isomorphisms of astrophysics.
We shall consider the theme in more detail in the next paragraphs.
In that regard the reader would notice the use of T.Œ, which no doubt as the century goes through and the theory is accepted to substitute mechanism as the philosophy of science that unifies them all, will become more important: to guide each science for the most likely to succeed paths of future research, through its stringent ‘economicity’ and enlightening isomorphisms.
So strangelets as the components of the Halo of galaxies, top quark hadrons of different BCT combinations as the cut-off substances of black holes, neutrinos as the h-Planck ‘strings’ of gravitational transversal waves between galaxies and within galaxies, the waves that maintain the stability and form of star orbits (of which I have read a few quite convincing models of astrophysics) are the most interesting ‘selections’ I have made on my constant ‘reading’ of astrophysicists’ paper, which is all what at this stage of my life can do for the discipline.
On the other side there are theories that do NOT fit at all within 5D T.Œ and I doubt will ever be proved, SUSYs and background dependent string theories should be out of the picture; non-quark dark matter theories too, with all its array of particles. T.Œ is limited because space and time are limited.
And what about the Higgs. As one of the leading activists against accelerators and big-bang experiments on earth, you might think 5D doesn’t have a role for it, but it does (given the chances to produce top quark black holes or strangelet that could explode the planet, in this I have been obviously very active, reason why the astrophysical community does not consider 5D Physics, but beyond personal careers one must be ethic as a finitesimal of the superorganism of mankind – and that is what physicists and economists so strongly criticized in my work have forgotten despite whatever they find about nature).
Essentially the Higgs field and similar models respond precisely to the other element of the higher plane of existence of the Universe beyond galaxies, connected to top quarks of huge mass and likely 10 c rotary speed, and black holes and dark energy and dark matter.
In brief, the Higgs is the field of hyper-gravitational and hyper strong force, of 10c beyond the galaxy dark energy and dark matter, which is a taboo concept on astrophysics, because of an ill-understood conceptualization of General Relativity (it is not in 5D physics , as General relativity is a theory of the light space-time membrane or 4Dimension of the Universe, a present ‘slice’ of the time flow and the 5th dimension.
In their first paper on quantum electrodynamics, Heisenberg and Pauli asserted that quantization of the gravitational field, which appears to be necessary for physical reasons [in a footnote, they refer to the works of Einstein and Klein on that line], may be carried out without any new difficulties by means of a formalism fully analogous to that applied here.
During the thirties, the idea of a gravitational quantum came to be generally (but as we shall see, not universally) accepted by theoretical physicists, apart from the small relativity community that followed Einstein in his continued search for a (classical) unified theory. In the early thirties, there was some discussion of Bohr’s idea that the neutrino might be related to the gravitational quantum.
Bohr said to Pauli, (March 1934): ‘The idea was that the neutrino, for which one assumes a zero rest mass, could hardly be anything else than a gravitational wave with appropriate quantization’. Fermi had evidently had a similar idea, but was aware of the problem of the different spins.
Pauli to Heisenberg, February 1934: ‘Fermi would prefer to make a connection between neutrinos and half gravitational quanta.’ As late as November 1934, Pauli cautiously stated: ‘While up to now it has been held almost certain that gravitational phenomena play practically no role in nuclear physics, it now seems that the possibility cannot be immediately rejected, that the phenomena of beta-radiation could be connected with the square root of kappa [the gravitational constant]’ suggests that Pauli may have had in mind construction of a graviton from two neutrinos, along the lines of de Broglie’s neutrino theory of light.
They wrote: ‘The comparison displayed above indicates that the graviton and the neutrino have much in common. This probably testifies that in general the highly improbable process of graviton radiation becomes practically observable in beta-decay. If the neutrino turns out to be the graviton this would mean that contemporary physics had approached the limits beyond which there would be no present insurmountable barrier between gravitation and electromagnetism. Due to theoretical considerations it is hard to identify gravitons with the neutrino since it is hard to admit that they have the same spin 1/2 as the neutrino. In this respect gravitons have much more in common with light quanta. It is impossible, however, to totally rule out a theoretical possibility of their identification.
The so-defined gravitational quanta or ‘gravitons’ have the… spin 2… It is certainly a limitation of the quantum-mechanical side of this treatment, that one leaves it at that approximation, in which the general-relativistic field equations are linear. This limitation is most closely connected with the well-known divergence difficulties of field theory.
Apart from these divergence difficulties common to all quantum field theories at that time, Pauli, like Rosenfeld, seemed satisfied with linearized quantum gravity. But in 1935 Bronstein had already applied Fermi’s technique to the linearized Einstein equations, and came to much more skeptical conclusions, when he opined: ‘It is a task of the nearest future to identify the ties between quantum mechanics and the theory of gravitation… what will be needed is a sort of marriage between relativity and quantum theory’ He was stressing the crucial significance of the three dimensional constants c, G, and h in defining the past and future development of physics.
Those are the fundamental questions that physicists need to resolve in detail.
What T.Œ provides is the general analysis of the issue from the higher perspective of the organic laws of the Universe.
It is obvious that at this stage ‘humans’ will NOT accept in the present dogmatic, ‘believers’ in digital machines languages concept of physics anything like what we propose in this blog. But for very long I have learned to ‘eliminate’ the human concept of science in these dark ages, moved only by intellectual curiosity. So I write for future Asian generations or for robots, as the present ‘civilization’ of ego-trips of western men, thinking machines must do their job has no much of a future.
In that future, if humans want to understand the Universe they will develop a synthetic ‘above’ T.Œ, Organic Theory of Everything, and if they go under as it is likely ‘obviously’ robots will NEED to feel organisms, and they will ‘believe’ in T.Œ
So here it goes: T.Œ is Simple, minimalist and dualist. All systems do have 2 organic networks, blood and nervous systems, and the galaxy does have obviously two such fields, the background light and background neutrinos.
This is the fact and so i couldn’t care less if in the equations of Mr. Einstein graviton appears at 2 spin and in the equations of Mr. Fermi, neutrino appears at ½ spin. Solve it. Nature has both and makes them unavoidably the same role. There is no other particle in the present state of the galaxy, which exists and can play both roles. Not it will be discovered, because it will have to be on the range of energies of the galaxy, which have been already searched for. It cannot be in cuckoo super-energies as they will not manifest constantly in this universe, and so it doesn’t matter if you can unify at 500 zillion Gevs the present forces.
This is not here now and in this conditions> so it doesn’t matter here now and in these conditions is all found and so you must account reality with the thing you have found as there is nothing else to find here now and in this conditions.
Work your maths, if you haven’t doesn’t it is not because it is not there but because something is wrong with your 2 spin graviton, ½ spin neutrino and spin theory. Ok?
In the case we are occupied, neutrinos are by far the only candidate for the basic actions between fermions, as a firs step BEFORE the communication through light space-time, which is able to transfer information in much greater measure, starts the organic built up of the galaxy.
So the way to explain the galaxy is first in its organic structure, then in its descending parts, stars and atoms and particles, and then when we start to explain the basic actions between atoms, the neutrino which is the quanta of galactic gravitation, appears unavoidably as the first connection between atoms and particles which lock them at a certain entangled distance for them to start communication. This resolves the fundamental problem on the models in which neutrinos give origin to light, already proposed in the 30s.
The neutrino theory of light is the proposal that the photon is a composite particle formed of a neutrino antineutrino pair. It is based on the idea that emission and absorption of a photon corresponds to the creation and annihilation of a particle–antiparticle pair. The neutrino theory of light is not currently accepted as part of mainstream physics, but actually is quite straight forward in its maths. That is it is perfectly coherent.
Intermediate Space. Gravitational Waves and Solar Systems.
Now gravitons are massless just because it is considered to be a force with infinite range but this is not the case. The gravitation we study works within galaxies. Outside galaxies it should be the dark energy field, which is repulsive. So gravitons do not need to be massless in 5D. They might have the neutrino mass. It remains therefore to accommodate somehow the 2 rank tensor of gravitation, which determined 2 spin gravitons to convert them into ½ spin, as neutrino ½ spin seems to be proved. I will on the 4th line, charged with mathematical physics adventure my solution, but at this stage, those are questions, which require far more serious maths than this 2nd line can hold.
We thus will consider the following proposition: Gravitons are ½ spin, do not have infinite range – nothing does in 5D, ‘are’ neutrinos, create gravitational waves that communicate galaxies and maintain the structure of galaxies as single organisms, form the second background of the galaxy along the light background, representing the duality of any organic system, and originate when used as strings that connect two atoms in opposite directions a photon of light.
As I said the mathematical analysis goes to the 4th line, but it cannot be otherwise within the organic structure of the galaxy.
The reader in that sense must understand how T.Œ works: any of the 4 analysis possible of an event – the mathematical, most detailed one – the mental and action oriented from the zero-point of view that survives, and apperceives automatically the Universe, seeking for energy and information, iteration and social evolution; the organic spatial one of 3 space-time elements communicated through the rules of ¬Æ geometry, and the temporal, causal of the 3±∆ planes of existence, ARE necessary to SATISFY and qualify a system, event or form as truth.
And vice versa, each of them can properly define an event. And so we give an o.25% of truth to a theory with a mathematical consistence, a 0.25% when such theory satisfies the organic paradigm, another 0.25% when it defines the 5 actions of a system and another 0.25% when it defines the 3±∆ ages of the system.
This of course will be contested for decades if no centuries till T.Œ is accepted if ever by mankind. It does not matter to me. The point here is that at this stage of ‘inflation’ on mathematical physics one can easily find a theory for everything. So the way this post is constructed is simple. Unlike the classic scholar of physics which have no intention to define organically, temporally and from the perspective of actions its systems, but merely will work out equations of physics, twist them (today not even coherence is required specially when dealing with the internal space of black holes the external dark energy and any other region not experimentally evident), and then seek for with expensive machines to find parallel Universes, muinos or whatever.
T.Œ does not work like that. What I do is to start with the organic structure of a system, then to define it in space as a simultaneous organic system, then in time through its 3±∆ges and then normally as a third stage to work out the mathematics of it, because they are closely related believe it or not with the 4th element, which are the space-time actions of each ‘mental point of view’. So basically we work in 2 blocks: the spatial and temporal symmetry on one side, and the actions o space-time of the 0-point of view and its mathematical equations on the other side.
In this 2nd line I will work out the space-time symmetry and refer to the mathematical and space-time actions and constants very briefly. We are making in this introduction an exception, for the sake of representing to the specialist the full concept of T.Œ, considering in more detail the Neutrino ‘affair’.
During the 1930s there was great interest in the neutrino theory of light and Pascual Jordan and Max Born, and others worked on the theory. We are here talking of 2 of the 6 foremost fathers of quantum theory. So it is not to be taken lighter (Jordan worked out the matrices of Heisenberg, as a better mathematician and Born the probabilistic theory of Bohr, which only give the idea). De Broglie and Fermi also worked it out, but there were some obvious problems to it. The one most often mentioned – that a photon is not a composite particle is silly. To start with is composed of a myriad of H-planktons and if we get to see it in detail it will grow as any fractal point to cosmic dimensions – to become a quasi-star of the string world.
Now this was understood first by Dirac, and with many of the ambivalences of quantum theory, only made reasonable with the 3 different perspectives of 5D physics (scale, space or time), as any point from an upper scale view is a fractal of populations (space view) or probabilities (time view). So we should choose the description that better fits a phenomena, as related the OBSERVER’S experiment and the OBSERVABLE through one of those different perspectives, all of which add truth to the analysis (but only all together describe the multiplicity of the universe):
Some time before the discovery of quantum mechanics people realized that the connection between light waves and photons must be of a statistical character. What they did not clearly realize, however, was that the wave function gives information about the probability of one photon being in a particular place and not the probable number of photons in that place. The importance of the distinction can be made clear in the following way. Suppose we have a beam of light consisting of a large number of photons split up into two components of equal intensity. On the assumption that the beam is connected with the probable number of photons in it, we should have half the total number going into each component.
If the two components are now made to interfere, we should require a photon in one component to be able to interfere with one in the other. Sometimes these two photons would have to annihilate one another and other times they would have to produce four photons. This would contradict the conservation of energy. The new theory, which connects the wave function with probabilities for one photon gets over the difficulty by making each photon go partly into each of the two components. Each photon then interferes only with itself. Interference between two different photons never occurs.
So indeed, photons do split into its h-plancktons as electrons do split into its photon cells, and so on. It is just the point of view we adopt. From our ∆o perspective obviously both electrons and photons are point particles but also waves smearing its components. The same with neutrinos. We see a neutrino ∆-3 beta decay as a single particle-point but we do see a neutron star ‘beta decay’ at ∆+1 as 1059 neutrinos rushing out.
So how we can manage all that? Through parameters which are ‘integrals’ of space or time quanta, such as energy. So we find that the proportion neutrino/quark mass-energy in beta decay is the same than the proportion of neutrino/star novae mass energy, a 10%, which incidentally is once more the decametric scale of 3 x 3 +0 elements of 5D theory.
(5D strictly speaking would be a 10 Dimensional theory of 3 spatial components, 3 time ages, 3 scales of size-time speed and a 0-point pegging it all together, but not to scare too much the ‘primitives’ I decided given the idolatry to Einstein and his 4D concept to call it 5D call the 3 dimensions of time, 3 ages, whereas 4D is the present age, and so on.
But if there was some respect for it, of course I would use the 10 Dimensional analysis which is much better for the full ¬Æ model, anyway that is how it was originally written 24 years ago; and so one can imagine if we are still here by 2140, some Chinese congress on 10D rewriting the whole thing on the proper 10 D formalism. In that sense 10D means 10 parameters to fully describe a system, which are 10 parameters in General relativity 10 parameters in string theory, 10 systems in physiology, 10 is then the number of the game).
We have so far settle down just for 10 isomorphisms.
Now that is clear that light is NOT a point particle but can be treated in many ways what the Neutrino theory of light means is merely the ‘feeding of light’ in its lower gravitational scale, the use of neutrino and then light by other particles, Fermion < Boson > Fermion to communicate and ultimately the beginning of a creation of a network between particles and or stars that ‘cements’ the internal structure of galaxies to make them ‘galacells’, not mere rotary systems with no connection between its parts.
The point more difficult is how to match the polarization which is different, and how to find a mechanism that makes 2 neutrinos to couple together into the photon, in ‘lineal fashion’ to avoid the problems of obtaining its Fermi statistics from Bose-Dirac ones.
Jordan’s hypothesis that the neutrinos are emitted in exactly the same direction eliminated the need for theorizing an unknown interaction, but his hypothesis seemed rather artificial and was ignored. However it is precisely because neutrinos are the first communication act between two particles, entangling them that this is in T.Œ a must. Jordan obtained exact Bose–Einstein commutation relations for the composite photon – a longitudinally polarized photon, as commutation relations for pairs of fermions were similar to those for bosons:
Bosons are defined as the particles that adhere to the commutation relations:
The difference is minimal – a mere ‘delta term’
Specifically the size of the deviations from pure Bose behavior, ∆ (p” , p) depends on the degree of overlap of the fermion wave functions and the constraints of the Pauli exclusion principle. which is cancelled by a Raman effect in which a neutrino with momentum P+K is absorbed while another o with opposite spin and momentum K is emitted.
But again that is precisely what 5D T.Œ requires: a particle communicates with a second particle, which absorbs the neutrino and emits in the inverse direction a new one.
Neutrinos as tachyons.
Now we must understand that humans simply speaking will not easily accept any correction to their dogmas. ‘humans are slaves they believe, they don’t reason’. So physicist do NOT accept the dogma that c-speed is the limit of light speed, as it is the absolute modern dogma of their idol-god Mr. Einstein. Trust me. My first work on T.Œ was called the error of Einstein – the part of physics his theory did not account for and that was enough – young and bold – to get 300 rejections to the book (-;
This I said because in 5D, outside galaxies, outside light space-time, there are faster than light speeds, quite likely in the ‘inflaton’ field of the Higgs o-scalar, and maybe if Neutrinos have properties that experiments seem to show – but at this stage there is so much ‘ad hoc’ arrangement of data to favor ‘theory’ that frankly I am skeptical, and this particular part of 5D theory – neutrino physics, is the only one I haven’t yet settled down for definitive conclusions.
Now for faster than light particles all what you need is negative mass, as the Higgs has above its minimal energy. So happens to neutrinos, till recently when assailed by all data against it, c-believers have scared anyone pretending to measure faster than light neutrinos.
Measurements for electron neutrino mass
The mass of electron neutrinos is measured in tritium beta decay experiments. The decay results in a 3-helium, electron and an electron antineutrino. If neutrinos have non-zero mass, the spectrum of the electrons is deformed at the high energy part, i.e. the neutrino mass determines the maximum energy of emitted electrons.
To be exact, the experiments measure the neutrino mass squared. Curiously, when taken at the face value, all results during the last century, pointed to a negative mass squared, before the last scandal of faster-than-light neutrinos who ended the career of a few researchers till they gave up and ‘found’ luckily a loose cable:
Thus precisely in as much as the neutrino goes first back and the forwards between two particles that entangle each other with them, all the 3 problems of the neutrino theory of light are solved, miraculously by postulating what T.Œ requires in its organic and perceptive-action elements.
The 4 elements, the organic structure in which each new layer of reality builds upon the previous later (photons are created upon the previous layer of neutrinos), the mental structure that requires the event to correspond to one of the 5 possible actions of the Universe (neutrinos entangle particles over which waves of light communicate information), the temporal structure (neutrinos die-are absorbed giving birth to light at both extremes of the communication) and finally the mathematical structure (which can only be resolved precisely by a lineal communication of neutrinos and antineutrinos).
It remains now to consider the transversal vs. longitudinal polarization. Which is the final concept that truly solves the question
In the graph, the V> c is the front wave of neutrinos, B and A are the particles communicated by the neutrino wave front, which start a non-local communication, the neutrino wave locates both and locks them to start the building up of layers of the 5th dimension that will give birth to light
In simple terms:
– The spin of the 2 neutrinos back and forth ad up to form a single 1-spin unit as the photon has. And here makes sense that wonderful discovery that neutrinos are always left handed (-: so we can put them together to ad up 1 spin.
The lineal back and forth motion makes them both follow a lineal form. And its polarizes them in the same direction than light. So a ‘new entity’, light appears, which as an emerging new form does have obviously new properties, but is born from the neutrino in which it feeds. This is an essential characteristic that imposes a certain order in the galaxy.
And so it allow us to go further and consider in general that the neutrino waves between galaxies that carry energy interact constantly with the light waves and are the minimal information quanta of the Universe, which only give us information on the location along its path but good enough to form the necessary background for light to maintain its constant c-speed. And we will go back to its details, latter.
So the task to develop by a top-top physicist today would be to consider the possibility of a neutrino, which acts as a graviton for transversal gravitational waves between galaxies, a theme we will outline ‘grosso modo’ in this post and develop with more finesse but by no means exhaust in the 4th line. In brief, there must be transversal gravitational waves with a fundamental role in the Universe to connect galaxies, and keep the inner structure of galaxies in place, as it is the case (galaxies act as a solid structure with no difference of rotary speed between stars regardless of position).
So neutrinos should play roles similar to the graviton, as the ‘photon quanta’’ or more precisely the H-quanta of gravitational cosmic waves. This role in most hypothetical models of physics today is played by a string with 2 spin as that of gravitons tachyon speed, in some cases, which is a feature also of intergalactic gravitational waves in 5D (not within galaxies, where light is the dominant force that slows down and maintains c-speed as the limit, as Relativity well considers). So here is the surprising fact, which makes neutrinos so likely to be the graviton ‘string’:
Standard Model neutrinos are fundamental point-like particles. But an effective size can be defined using their electroweak cross section (apparent size in electroweak interaction). The average electroweak characteristic size is r2 = ∆ × 10−33 cm2 (∆ × 1 nanobarn), where ∆ = 3.2 for electron neutrino, ∆ = 1.7 for muon neutrino and ∆ = 1.0 for tau neutrino. As it happens 1.7 nanobarns is the area of a string. So both coincide.
Both can also be modeled as hyper luminal open strings/neutrinos, outside galaxies obviously, and so the only reason so far I do NOT affirm directly that the present neutrino IS the h-Planck constant of quantum gravity is the question of the neutrino, string and graviton spin, which is supposed to be ½, but by no means this question, in which I would recommend top theoretical physicist to work – as it is the unknown piece of 5D astrophysics which requires more analysis. Of course the strings to be used should be background independent, which is the other area that should be worked deeply.
The limits of stientific scales: STrings or galatoms?
All this said an important theme of 5Ð is the consideration on how many scales do exist, and what are the limits if the scales are infinite of the repetition of those scales. I am on this of the general view that it is likely the Universe can be mirrored by the 2 simplest forms of motion: a rotary motion or closed string, ‘§ð-ring;’ in the always modified jargon of 5D and a lineal motion or open STring -$tring – the two limits of topology in space and time of 5D:
We observe that the multiple dimensions of string theory are nothing but the ternary scalar dimensions of 5D: 3 human dimensions, 3 quark dimensions and 3 boson dimensions (the component of quarks). And we shall see how the Branes which might be considered those ‘larger pentagonal’ particles unfolded are ‘entangled’ connected by the bosons… And all is ultimately about the actions=dimotions of space-time communicated by those strings of ‘energy’. So ultimately when we considering some aspects of string theory of the fourth line we shall see that is just 5D with a very complicated jargon due to the lack of conceptual understanding of physics, and excellent mathematics, which however lack any ‘restriction’ to distinguish as Einstein put it ‘what is mathematical truth and what is physical reality’. So we stick with 5D, a far more real, better conceptualized model.
String theory in that sense is a fascinating theme, which however requires too many corrections to be worthy beyond physics:
1) To correct the errors of being Newtonian, that is using absolute space-time in its formulation 2)to simplify and clarify its math, putting them in relationship to 5D, which is a ginormous task both of mathematical work and of penpal, congress activity to ‘convert the believers’… which in any case I can’t do at this time and age, given the philosophy of stience that considers the highest stience history, the study of human super organisms.
The limits of string theory are in that sense, the same of classic physics. Its purpose deluded: to unify all other particles and systems, indeed, at first it seems a great advance. After all we just have a Lagrangian with a Length-parameter (the string Planck’s length), and voila all comes from its vibrations… in 12 dimensions, which means we must define all modes of vibrations and all dimensions, and this is what makes the whole thing risible: what we lost in variation for sake of unification into a single length parameter, we gain in new complexity for new dimensions and vibrational modes, making absurd the concept that string theory ‘simplifies’ and unifies all to a ‘length’.
Moreover, as usual, as time is NOT understood in physics, there is NO revolution at all of concepts. All those dimensions are ‘spatial dimensions’.
So ultimately we are just in the same frame – the only real discovery is the concept that a point-particle is a fractal point, that is it has volume, is a closed string cycle (or an open one). So instead of worldliness we make world sheets, but alas, is just a locomotion, not a world cycle.
So the string revolution is really not such revolution. It all consists in doing exactly the same mathematical manipulations of modern physics to describe reality from that ‘spatial length’:
I.e. we define a string action. We will then proceed to construct invariants, or symmetries, for this action. Using Noether’s theorem we will then find the conserved quantities of the theory, namely the stress energy tensor and Hamiltonian. We then quantize the string in the usual canonical fashion and calculate its mass spectrum and streamline all the new parameters, by making them a background spacetime, in which the string propagates, in dimension 10, 12, 26… We then proceed to quantize the string theory… And so really the ‘goal’ of unification is just not there, and the need for making strings ‘space-time’ beings, is negated by the background of multiple dimensions.
This said I believe in string theory in its proper format due to the many parallelisms with 5D. It is almost magic to study string theory and find when properly translated that all its laws are mirror laws of 5D: from its duality of open-locomotion strings vs. closed, information strings to its 5D entangled versions, mirror symmetries of each other, which come together into the 12 Disomorphisms of M-Theory, through its ‘vital properties’, similar to our 5Dimotions (strings move, reproduce, as they grow when energy feeds them, evolve socially into branes, etc.) to its S and T dualities, which properly understood are the key to the symmetries between the 5D views of any species of the Universe.
In that sense although a complete formulation of M-theory is not known, physicists agree that the theory should describe two and five-dimensional objects called branes (: ST and 5Ð branes, that is) and should be approximated by eleven-dimensional supergravity at low energies (one of the many inflationary formulations of the ¡±4 intergalactic dark space).
For a while back in the 90s I worked on the proper corrections needed for M-theory to work according to 5D, enough to say that its proper formulation in terms of closed clock Sðrings and open $trings, can theoretically wrap up a Universe of infinite planes, which repeat themselves
String theory is thus the most obvious candidate to the be ‘unobserved limits’ of reality, where a series of superstrings connected to circles of galaxies, will be the best way to describe the local universe, as the graphs of Lanakea shows, and viceversa, micro strings are the best way to describe.
So if we want to consider ‘stientific, experimental truths’, we should start physics beyond STring metaphysics and consider in the nested Universe the truly observable reality of the galaxy-atom, of which we observer fully the ‘vital energy’ between the dark world of the Universe past the $>c and ð<0 barrier of lineal motion and temperature order of our world. We shall call this super organism the galatom and consider physics the stience that studies it.
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
In any case it is essential for physicists to understand also the inflationary nature of languages of information, soon to be explained, as kaleidoscopic mirrors of a single universe, and so well observed in the proposed unification of all string theories by the 12th parameters of M-theory. We will put an example of it, when unifying forces (charges and masses). Information IS inflationary and as any system follows the same laws, as time passes, systems ‘AGE’, so do languages that enter a third age of excessive information, metalinguistics and repetitive patterns as old men do, ‘DETACHING ITSELF’ from reality into its own syntax=memory.
This 3rd age of mathematics only recognized by lobachevski and Godel, who proved the need for experimental evidence, is the true ‘old age sickness’ of mathematical physics.
For that reason we shall not work the -4v posts that should deal with the dark world of strings, neutrinos, gravitons, Higgs bosons and dark entropy=energy (not so much dark matter, obviously, quark-ultradense matter). As all stiences are equally important; and string theory corrections are complex math… So ultimately IS much better to start off saying simply that the origin of reality are $trings, lines of spatial motion and Sð-rings, rotary clocks of time; both below (quantum strings) and above (cosmological strings), as those we can observe in our region of the Universe:
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
All this said, humans have committed a very obvious error on their perception of reality – to believe that their clock of time, the lineal mechanical systems deviced by Galileo are the only time of the Universe, just because we invent those clocks and used them to equalize all time cycles of reality. And to believe that what we see with telescopes is the only reality, denying also the duality of motion and dimension, time and space, from the very inception of physics.
So we shall close this very brief introduction to cosmology, to metaphysics, which is not so much concerned with the data and facts and equations of physics but with its ¡logic principles as there is scanty data on the ¡±4 planes, and we must deduce it as Mendeleiev did with the table of elements, from the Ðisomorphic properties of all beings, with the essence of the ‘reductionist’ Aristotelian error of physics, regarding ‘relativity of motion’: to fail to realize that the true question about Copernicus finding is to explain why ‘the Earth moves and doesn’t move at the same time’.