**I. 5D ****SPACE-TIME**

In each scale of existence the fifth dimension receives in a different language a different name by each Tiƒ referential point, of which some names we humans know to exist even if we name them ourselves. In the absolute relativity of an infinite scale of spaces, which repeat themselves from atoms to galaxies, without any reason not to be infinite, reduction of ∆±i to ∆±1, the superorganic structure, Œ, is the best choice for a meaningful understanding of the new planes, which in the next graphs are summarised from physical and biosociological sciences:

*In the graph, the Universe has infinite time clocks, that code its information in the frequency and speed of its time cycles.*

The Universe is a game of 3 perpetual motions, which however synchronise its cycles of existence in time, in such a form that across a perpendicular image of them in ‘space’ shows hidden formal intelligence, ‘alliances’ of world cycles, which become complex subtle systems called super organisms, constantly variating but becoming clearly recognised as the synchronous flash images of a series of world cycles of space-time, webbed by clone networks.

In a Universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time. Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower.

*This is a Universal law:*

Mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant.

So we can write in a first approximation: Sp x Tƒ = ∆ and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tƒ, whereas Tƒ is the fundamental symbols for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA.

*Let us then in the second part of this introductory post on the 3 elements of reality consider all together now, how fractal space-time beings trace its world cycles of existence, by varying the speed of its time cycles, the size of its spatial form, and organising themselves into networks that become complex organisms of energy and information .*

The simplest equation of space time is present energy = past entropy operandi future information.

How entropy is recollected by an operandi of future information tends to take then two different paths:

e= s ±t.

**Nature’s time clocks constantly accelerate into information and decelerate into energy.**

*In the graph, Nature’s time clocks do vary their speed in different regions of space – the great discovery of relativity – which means each space-time being has a different time speed. But they also vary their speed as they trace a finite time cycle, either imploding an accelerating as a time vortex of increasing information: max. tif x min **spe (informative time arrow of future), or decreasing in speed of time and increasing in space (max. spe x min. tif), creating an entropic arrow. A world cycle of existence is therefore the sum of all those changes in the arrows of time of a being, which ‘magically’ become ordered in 3 ages: Max. Spe (youth), Spe=tif (adult-reproductive age) and Max. tif (3rd age of information), which explodes back into entropy in the moment of death (tif<<Spe). *

*In the graph on the left the version of those ages in an information-energy scale, in the center the first human observation of the process in scientific taoism, in the right, an informative time clock or vortex, V x R=k, which is the commonest manifestation in physical systems of the arrow of information, called ‘charges’ (∆-1 scale) or masses (∆+1 scale).*

‘Space and time’ can be transformed into each other. Since space is basically in the human conceptual understanding a simultaneous ‘slice’ or ‘present moment’ of a ‘motion or change’ in time. Simultaneous perception in that sense of multiple time cycles happening sometimes in synchronised chains, sometimes as fractal parts, become space. Hence we shall observe another range of phenomena: the transformation of a motion of time into a still surface of space. In fact, we could define death as the ‘slow down of time’ to a halt, in which motion ceases to exist. So those are some of the basic ‘games’ of the Universe between time clocks and space-quanta. In the case of the Lorentz transformations, the time clocks of speed close c, are transformed into space quanta, mass.

Also notice that speed in classic physics is defined as v=s/t, but this t is lineal duration, the opposite of frequency of cyclical time. So speed (angular speed of a time clock) is the inversion of duration, lineal time: Tƒ=1/t. Thus if we consider 1 single space quanta or step of a motion, the translation of the clock of nature to the human mechanical clock is obvious.

The main differences between those clocks of nature and the mechanical clock are clear: Nature has different time clocks, or time cycles, and all of them vary in frequency, because the 5th dimension does vary its time clocks – it is in fact the essence of this dimension.

However the arrival of lineal physics and the mechanical clock hid this self-evident Universe made of infinite space quanta and time cycles, substituted by abstract Newtonian models of an absolute continuum space drawn over a paper (the Cartesian Plane), in which all those parts of space, are pegged together, and a single clock and time rhythm measured with those mechanical clocks that equalized all rhythms of nature to its steady, tic-toc. But Nature does have its own clocks to measure time, which ultimately is the repetition of cyclical forms of in-form-ation, different for each species, which processes that information with logic, formal cycles of different lengths, durations and speeds.

So the ultimate meaning of a Universe of infinite time cycles, regulated by Nature’s clocks, was lost, and time became, in words of Einstein ‘what a clock measures’. Moreover as the clock had a relative, steady state speed, and can be elongated ad infinitum, rewinding its engine, the fact that the cycles of temporal information (ab. O-Tiƒ, in the jargon of Fractal space-time, ab. ∆St) of any system are always finite (by the very same nature of a time cycle that closes into itself) and do have different forms and speed at different moments, became also forgotten.

This is self-evident when we realize that Nature measures time with different physical clocks, for different families of species.

**Difference between mechanical lineal clocks and cyclical, informative time clocks in Nature.**

Man uses the **frequency** of waves to measure time in the quantum scale (ab. ∆-1 ST, in the jargon of Fractal space-Time).

He uses molecular vibrations, which humans measure with **temperatures (ab. ∆ST)**, to define the cycles of larger molecular systems.

And he uses different forms of speed, notably angular speed, in the even larger **gravitational** ‘∆+1’ Space-Time Scale.

And so the infinite cycles of time of Universal beings, and its different clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed), whose rhythms and forms carry the in-form-ative patterns, became also forgotten, with the arrival of artificial, mechanical clocks, which established a steady single, human rhythm to time, of infinite duration. Of course, because using a single human rod of measure for space, or ‘quanta’, the meter, and a single human time cycle or ‘second’, equalizing all other systems with them, allowed a perspective on reality from the human practical point of view, the use of seconds in time and meters in space, facilitated measure and construction of machines, weapons and buildings, greatly improving the praxis of human life.

So what man lost in his philosophical understanding of reality, he gained it in practical power. And as measures with single clocks and single space rods increased, many regularities of Nature were tabulated, albeit deformed by its equalization with clocks and single space continuums. However, and this is a key element to understand why a Universal model, slightly deformed in its fundamental principle works, a system with a distorted perspective, such as the Ptolemaic system with the Earth at its center, can fully describe reality, merely by adding complex corrections to cater the distorted point of view.

**The unification of scales, through time clocks and space-quanta.**

The immense number of solutions the metric 5D equation brings to mathematical physics, is fascinating, including the Unification of G and k.

Since those 2 constants are merely the constants of ‘relative curvature and time speed’ of the largest and smallest gravitational and quantum scales of reality. So masses and charges, are vortices, which as space and time can be transformed into each other, can be considered as space-quanta hence curvatures (Einstein’s treatment of mass, Faraday treatment of charges as lines of force in space or field concept) and if we consider them cyclical motions of time, or clocks of both scales, as attractive vortices (Newton’s concept of mass and quantum concept of charge).

And so when we realise we are studying two fractal scales of the Universe, mathematically as I showed in that other article we can unify their values, and we shall find that the curvature of k, and its speed as an attractive vortex of space-time, is paradoxically 10 up to 40 times faster-stronger-more curved in the smaller k f charges than the larger, slower G of masses.

But the revolution of thought goes much further. For example, each scale we shall find to have a different faster or smaller clock of time (below some examples) and a larger or smaller Universal constant of space quanta. So the 3 scales of human perception, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale have 3 different clocks, ∆-1 ‘frequency’, ∆-temperature, and ∆+1 speed, and 3 different quanta of bidimensional space, H-planck (angular momentum), k (entropy) and M (mass).

And yet the beauty of it is that the metric of the 5th dimension always work.

** The bias of artificial time clocks and physics has limited our understanding of reality.**

The conclusion of the fractal paradigm is obvious:

Physical, human measures of reality with a single time and space are more complex specially at conceptual level than the more realist model, using the proper quanta of space measure (the so called Universal constants) and time clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed) but they do work. Moreover they have established a scientific praxis for 400 years that would be extremely costly to vary, as the Industrial revolution, converted the clock today evolved into a computer in the model of all temporal things, and the meter, today the speed of light, as the quanta of all spaces.

And so physicists are comfortable with this absolute space-time picture of reality. We, Philosophers of science, however are not practical beings, only concerned with the objective truths of the Universe. So we are not satisfied with Physicists’ models and the purpose of this blog is to establish a more objective picture of the Universe, using the different clocks of time and quanta of space we find in Nature (as science is ultimately the search for an objectivity that goes beyond the subjective human anthropomorphic view, so science moved from earth-centric models to heliocentric models, and should move from human time models into Universal time models).

So the quantic nature of space and cyclical nature of time was forgotten, and the fact that we are ‘relational space-time beings’, made of space quanta and time cycles, – Leibniz’s alternative model to that of Newton, remained ignored for 2 centuries.

Then in the XIX and XX century, new advances in mathematics, physics and biology made unavoidable the resurrection of the ‘real models’ of Nature, as Darwin found the evolutionary, time rhythms of nature and its species, which were neither infinite in duration, nor it follow the steady mechanical, artificial rhythm of human time clocks; Lobachevski found that space was indeed discontinuous, with different geometrical forms in different regions of the Universe, Einstein found time clocks were multiple and run at different speeds, and defined the quanta of the larger gravitational scale of size, or rest mass, while quantum theorists discovered in the other extreme of size, the H-Planck bidimensional quanta of angular momentum h, was also a constant; and Boltzmann found the Universal quanta of space of thermodynamic world, ‘Entropy’, was also a constant K.

When physicists discovered that in fact even the smallest spaces do have motion and are made of quanta, and Einstein discovered that the rhythms of time varied and had different speeds, the routines of this ‘simplistic’ Newtonian model had to be changed. As Einstein put it: ‘Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the entire scaffolding of western science from its foundations’.

Thus human concepts of a continuous absolute space and lineal absolute time, invented by Newton and the mechanical clocks, are no longer valid, and we must substitute them for the real concepts of nature and modern physics: a world of multiple space quanta with motion and a world of multiple cycles of time with different speeds.

Why a philosopher of science and not a physicist has completed such a model should be obvious to the reader. The philosopher of science is concerned with the big questions, what is time, space, energy information and with the unification of all sciences and scales of reality form quantum to astronomy through biology and social sciences. So themes of such wide range as those treated here are more proper of philosophers of science.

Further on, the philosopher of science departs not from the study of a specific type of space-time systems (physical systems of matter) but from the principle, laws and mathematical and logic languages of time and space, we humans use to perceive reality. Thus once the physicist gather experimental evidence with its instruments, he is at loss with the theoretical analysis on the widest possible terms of those experiments There is where the work fo the philosopher of science, master of languages of thought more than of machines of perception, comes in.

Since science is a logic, mathematical statement about reality, so there are also clear new advances on logic and mathematics, which in the XIX century r=evolved scientific thought and again have not yet fully incorporated into our models of reality.

Since science is based in mathematical languages, and language is based in geometry, scientists faced in the XIX century the shocking fact that Euclidean geometry is not truth; since the 5^{th} postulate of Geometry, which defines points with no breath, through which only a line also with no breath, can cross, proved false. There are different possible geometries, in which points do have breath, so several parallels can cross their volume, or points exist in a different surface through which no parallels exist.

How can we then introduce the new concepts of points with breath, surfaces with different numbers of parallels, in the scientific discourse of different sciences? Here again little advance was done, and so mathematicians at the beginning of the XX century decided to get away with the problem by merely NOT defining any longer the concepts of points, planes, lines and the relationships between them (their relative similarity or ‘congruence’ and the way they ‘intersect and lay on’). Thus two new false solutions were devised. On one side, instead of points and numbers, the classic units of mathematics that made them a realist science.

So physicists and philosophers of science have been aware for a century that space is quantic, with motion, and there are infinite time cycles-clocks in Nature. Yet the difficulty to re-define the fundamental original proposition of science, paralleled by the constant needs for merely parched the model.

Look around you. All what you perceive are 2 type of ‘forms in motion’, lineal forms that we shall call space, S, when perceived in stillness or lineal momentum, |-p, when perceived in motion, and cyclical forms, which we shall call time cycles or angular momentum when in motion, measured by frequency, |-Tƒ and information form when seeing in stillness.

And so those 2 elements, |-Spe and O-Tiƒ, spatial momentum and temporal form, and its infinite combinations, measured with different time clocks, frequency, temperature, speed and space quanta, H-Planck, K-entropy and M-ass, and integrated into different types of ‘energy and information’, is truly what all the Universe is made of. And so we can write a simple Generator equation of the Universe:

Ei= Sp x Tƒ for all scales of reality, which breaks down for the 3 main physical scales into the 3 most important equations of mathematical physics: E=hv (for the ∆-1 quantum scale), E=knT (for the ∆-human thermodynamic scale) and E=1/2mv² or E=mc² in Einstein’s relativity for the gravitational ∆+1 scale.

This never before explained meaning of the main universal constants and clocks of time of nature is the beginning of a revolution of thought that either humans or robots, if they survive the age of global weapons and war we live in, and preserve this planet for future human or mechanical generations, will research in depth, as it is the next step on the search of science for a non-anthropomorphic, scientific, objective description of the fractal, organic Universe. And the only model able to achieve…

We have used a loosely connected concept of space as lineal form with less motion that time a cyclical accelerated vortex to describe the fundamental game=law of the Universe, which is the constant beat back and forth between both formal motions. We can rephrase the game in many ways depending on how much information and varieties of that beat we include in the ‘sentence’

‘The Universe is a game of knots of space-time cyclical motions that switch back and forth between the states of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information, ad eternal’

It is today customary in the peculiar present frame of mind of the human species, with its cult(ure) of sensorial machines to reframe this game in terms of physical measures with metal-minds and its mathematical language as the principle of energy conservation. Otherwise the human ‘believer’ will not feel satisfied.

We obviously will do so in the posts on physics but not here. As ‘the languages of god are infinite’ (upanishads) and the way they express the underlying game of existence, also.

It is though important to consider that, being physics the study of motions, the game does have a strong physical content, namely its ‘motion properties or time’; as it has a strong mathematical content, ‘its formal properties or space’.

If we consider the game to be expressed in ternary terms as |-Sp<STœ>O-Tƒ elements, this how external motion and form will be the point of view of the ST present element.

But then when we seek beyond those 2 primary hows, we shall find the game actually has from the Tƒ point of view, a mental, psychological nature – namely to provide ‘perception to its 0-points of will that seek for positions of maximal perception at the centre of its territory.

And it has from the Sp-field/limb point of view a by extension of human sensations, some pleasure or sense of chaotic freedom when in motion.

Those internal points of view however are under the larger world view of the game, through its scales of the 5th dimension. There, the game has a teleological sense because beyond the Œn-plane of existence, the game does build co-existing super organisms, across multiple planes of existence, through elements, which are the most sophisticated of the game: synchronicities and co-existences, time travels and eusocial loving evolution. This is the level of understanding of the game in terms of its more complex fundamental element: as a SUPERORGANISM.

This said as always in the ternary expression of the Universe we can with the symbols of ¬Æ to express the game in 3 manners.

The fundamental beat of the Universe is the stop and go, form and motion, space and time beat of energy and information, informative perception and entropic pleasure, Sp>Tƒ>Sp>Tƒ>Tiƒ>Spe>Tƒ…

The importance of this beat of existence as one of the fundamental modes of being…

along the change of form, Tƒ<|s>Tƒ<|s>Mt<Spe>Mt<Spe…

And the beats of parts and wholes along the 5th dimension, ∂t=S : ∫S=t… compound the 3 dualities of what we call in a larger sense, ‘space and time’, the beats of existence.

In this post we shall study them in a generic way, complementary to their analysis with more formal rigour in the 3rd line (2-manifolds), in which we will analyse how a dimension of time and one of space come together into being.

Now, that such a beat exists in all scales and it is the fundamental mode of being, in all arts, in all expressions of the space-time cycle should be obvious from the point of view of the human observer, from which we always depart in our analysis of reality.

You stop and perceive and observe form, you walk then to the point you observe; and so two space-time actions are chained, also by this first beat of existence

∆i (gauging information)<∆a: moving towards a goal most likely < ∆e, feeding on energy…

Without perceiving form however the beat of existence cannot start its walk.

And the next step of the understanding of this beat of existence, is the parallelism between Space and Energy and Time and information, the still and go versions of this rhythm.

There are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries that move (called for that reason ‘topologies’).

Thus all systems can only have 3 kind of parts: Toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon); hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. In the graph, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show those 3 similar topologic structures. This similarity is called an ‘isomorphism’, iso=equal, morph=form.

**Entropy as a quanta of thermodynamic, lineal space-motion.**

This is a verbal explanation, and visual explanation of the fractal Universe and its Temporal, informative vortices, worldcycles and planes of flat distances-motions in space.

We can be more precise with basic mathematical equations, trying to put some order on all of this. Because that is the advantage of the simple, biased, erroneous models of physics with a single mechanical clock that deforms the essence of all clocks of nature, and a single space continuum that pegs all the spaces of nature – the model of absolute space-time of Newton.

For me it was clear from the beginning that model was wrong. So I looked for an alternative model, which is the model of relational spaces and times of Leibniz, but the problem of this more truthful model was clearly expressed by Einstein:

“I seem to be the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild the foundations of physics from the beginning’. Leibniz told it to Newton: there is not an absolute time clock. And he laughed at him, when Mercury showed not to follow the same rhythm that other planets, when told that Newton expected ‘god’ to correct the clock of mercury. If god is perfect, why it has set up a clock with different rhythms, and now has to correct it? Why he didn’t put it right the first time?

The mechanical clock though was the god of time of physicist, and they would NOT explore the clocks of nature as Taoists had told the Newtonian brits.

I found in Indonesia travelling inland a temple in the mountains filled with carillons. Those were the gods of the Dutch that the tribal Indonesians captured when fighting them, and took it to their temples. They thought they were the gods of the Dutch because they were all day looking at the clock and whenever an Indonesian followed nature’s rhythms he was told to be lazy, ‘blasphemous’. The clock-time of salaries measured workers, the c measuring of Nature rhythms is what matter to the physicist.

So when they asked Einstein what time was he said ‘what a clock measures’. He had failed to put into a formal mathematical metric Leibniz’s right relational infinite quanta and cycles of space-times, and had go back to the fold.

So this is what I did – to formalize Leibniz’s concept of an infinite number of spaces, fractal pieces of space of different sizes, which only peg together like a puzzle, in the human mind gave us the continuum space. To that aim I ordered them by size, from smaller quanta to larger quanta, from small atoms to larger galaxies.

And I ordered according to their speed of cyclical frequency, all the different clocks of nature, all the different closed trajectories, cyclical motions, from atomic orbitals to galaxies.

And then matched them together, by the simple method of multiplying them, Sp x Tƒ , and found alas, the miracle of miracles, that for huge entire families of related systems, including atoms and galaxies in the 2 extremes of the physical Universe (but also for biological systems, from cells to multicellular and ecosystemic systems, and even for cycles of history), *the product of the spatial size and temporal frequency of the whole family of related systems, remain invariant. Sp x Tƒ = ∆.*

*This C-onstant, conserved co-invariant dual parameter of the Universe could obviously not be anything else but the Principle of Conservation of Energy and Information, which worked for entire families of reality, and in the case of physical systems, clearly defined 3+i scales of reality (one i-maginary, in the sense we know little about this scale beyond galaxies, of dark energy and dark matter, which I call the dark world, in which we find black holes, interstellar dark energy space and the halo of galaxies – but whose properties I would deduce by extending the metric equation beyond the 3 scales we do know):*

*In the graph you can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, the gravitational scale of big galaxies. The thermodynamic scales of human beings, the electromagnetic scale of quantum atoms, and beyond a possible dark world scale. And since the quanta of space grows in size-distance-speed (remember we cannot distinguish speed from distance), and slows down in time speed, this dark world beyond our galaxy likely will go beyond the c-speed distance of our light space-time galaxy, and below the 0 temperature clock of our thermodynamic World.*

So while we cannot be sure of this dark world we ill never truly see or experience, I could just use the metric patterns of the other 3 scales to define the 4th scale as one that happens, beyond the c-barrier and 0-temperature of space-time.

Thus there are only 3 known-known scales, where the invariant Sp x Tƒ constant product gives us the ‘Energy and information’ conserved in the Universe.

And so for each of those scales I just had to find an equation of “energy’ that describe the system, in each relative plane of size and time speed, and then find its ‘parameters to measure’ the frequency of its motions and the constant quanta of fixed space of each scale:

Ei = ∫ Sp x Tƒ. And once such equations were found, *I found the main clocks of time of the Universe for each scale of the fifth dimension, and resolved the conundrum of the meaning of mathematical physics, Energy, the Universal constants of space and the different clocks of time of the Universe that have existed well before humans invented their mechanical clock:*

In terms of energy, Space and Time, scientists have resolved the details of the general equation, Ei=∫ Sp x Tƒ for each scale, with higher detail in our ∆º thermodynamic scale: E= Pv = nKT, 2 formulae for the upper scale, 1/2 mv2 and then the limit e=mc2 of human perception, and lesser detail in the lower scale, E=hv:

*Now you can see in the graph, the ‘specific’ equations of the 3 known-known scales of the Universe, *which we call:

The ∆+1 gravitational scale (∆ being the symbol for a relative scalar plane of size and speed of time of the 5^{th} dimension, which is the sum of all of them). Here the quanta of ‘space’ is obviously mass, which is what occupies the volumes of space of this scale, and the quanta of time motion, is speed, angular frequency or wave motion, with the limit of c-speed. So the equation is:

E=1/2mv² or mc² in Galilean and Einstein’s’ relativity.

The difference as the second was obtained from the first through a Newton binomial derivation, is the ‘limit’ or membrane of our alacit light space-time bigger super organism, fractal mirror on the 5th dimension of the atomic scale (see Unification equation of both: E=mc2 + E=hv, M=v (h/c2).

THUS THE RATIO H/C2 is the ratio between the 2 mass/charger vortices of the human perception and each galaxy an atom of the larger scale:

In the graph the 3 scales of matter, the quantum, planetary and galactic scale – the supposed fourth of a cosmic big-bang (wmap of the universal big-bang, as the image shows, has the exact form of the galaxy, since IT IS a mapping of the galaxy radiation, NOT of the universe, which we presume to be a network of atoms, forming some S+1 molecular form in a larger scale:

In the graph the molecular network of galaxies of 10ˆ10 galaxies can be interpreted if we ad the 96% of not observed dark matter, (no slow hydrogen-like atoms communicating in this universe with electromagnetic radiation) can be anything from the outer surface of a photon exploding in a electromagnetic field to a plankton in a sea of water, to a worm-likne network… imagination is your limit for a 4% of perception of it. It does not seem a very complex form though, as mch as the human networks of 10²/π trillion ambulatory cells.

Now the reader should realize that speed, angular or wave speed DOES change the frequency of its steps. A wheel turning cyclically to move a car can move at higher r=evolutions per minute

*Let us then return to those graphs and clocks of time, as we are now close to the more strict concept of entropy.*

The ∆-thermodynamic human scale is the next scale of the 5^{th} dimension’s relative planes of size and speed. And here we realize while Energy is conserved, the total quantity of formal motions, angular and lineal momentum clocks of time and quanta of space are conserved, *as the speed of time clocks and the quanta of space change, we need new ‘concepts’, new ‘clocks’, new Universal constants of space-quanta to measure it. *

So in thermodynamics we have a new equation, E=nkT (with small variations fro specific fractal species of thermodynamic matter, gas, liquid etc.). And here obviously n being a number of atoms, is really E=KT, where T is the temperature of the system, the thermodynamic clock, so cold systems are slow in time, hot systems are fast in time, hot mammals have fast metabolic clocks and thoughts, cold reptiles and plants slow, but alas the beauty of the Universe is that this big cold plants and dinosaurs do live longer than the fast, small humans, since roughly speaking for each family of reality, Tƒ x Sp = Constant.

So Temperature is the clock of time of the thermodynamic scale and its constant of space, lineal, expansive motion is K, the Boltzmann constant, which has the dimensions of ENTROPY.

So ENTROPY is the quanta of expansive spatial motions, of the thermodynamic scale, and only makes sense for thermodynamic systems.

Finally we get into the ∆-1 scale of electromagnetic quantum systems, and here again the equation is obvious Ei=H ƒ, so the quanta of space is H-Planck, the Universal constant, and the frequency of time, is ƒ, the frequency of the wave. So those are the 3 scales of physical systems. Its fundamental equations, time clocks and quanta of space.

All in the Universe is thus a mixture of space and time but both concepts are not the same bidimensional reality. We measure space with bidimensional quanta in each scale.

They ARE the 3 most important Universal Constants of Physics, H-Planck, a bidimensional angular bijector, k-Boltzmann constant, the quanta of entropic space in the thermodynamic world, and c2, the quanta of constant space in the gravitational world (reason why we do NOT see it varying in speed-distances, as it IS the substance of which our gravitational light space-time is made):

In the graph you can see all the bidimensional planes of space of each scale, entropy, cc speed-distance and angular momentum (H-Planck).

So, your quanta of space=universal constants change, as you change scale of physical systems, in harmony with the change of ‘time clocks’ …

But the product of both, space quanta and time clocks, remain the same:

* Sp x T ƒ = ∆±n; ∫ST=Ei*

This is the principle of conservation of energy and information, which merely integrates along space or along time a population or series of events of space-time, hence meaning the overall conservation of the total space-time of each scale of the Universe.

The graph is easy to grasp, since the Universe is indeed as Einstein said simple and not malicious.

Since we do have 3 very simple equations that reflect the previous ‘5D metric’ that works for any scale, in each of the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, worth to repeat to stress that simplicity and straightforwardness that shows truth in science, the so called Ockham’s principle:

∆-1 (quantum scale): E= h v;

∆ (thermodynamic scale): E= kT;

∆+1 (gravitational scale): E= c2 M

As shown in the above graphs.

Frequency of a quantum wave, temperature of a molecule, speed of a mass are the one-dimensional Clocks of Time that ‘change’ within a stable range in each scale.

H-angular momentum, K-entropy and Cc, are the bidimensional quanta of space that put together create the stable Ei, energy and information conserved in the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being.

In 5d physics, we simply say the Universe conserves its quantity of ‘present space-time’. That simple statement includes all conservation principles of all sciences.

This canonical definition of H, K, and C, bidimensional angular momentum, entropy and Speed, the space quanta which of each scale means that entropy DOES not apply at ALL as a concept BEYOND the thermodynamic scale, roughly on the 0-10.000 temperature beyond which it breaks down, that is molecules cease to exist and become plasma ruled by electromagnetic flows, hence by the clocks of ‘frequency’.

Now look at the second equation, E=kT.

if you substitute E for M its inverse then we write: M= k /T.

That is the equation of mass growth of a black hole:

As temperature diminishes, Mass grows. So he black hole is born hot, follows the laws of thermodynamic entropy, diminishes temperature and eats up our world, till Temperature clocks come to zero, temperature disappears, the black hole reaches 0 entropy and perfect informative order, as experimental and theoretical facts, both in 4D Einstein’s EFE, equations and 5D Metric shows.

Why? Look at the next graph…

__The dark world.__

In the next graphs, when we cross scales of the 5th dimension, the simple Sp x Tƒ = E, lineal relationship and nice equations of conservation of energy and information ‘break’ and suddenly the equations do NOT work as we enter a ‘transitional region’ between two scales of space-time.

Whereas the time frequency of motion no longer behaves lineally. It finds a limit and cannot grow more. And those barriers are met with the equations that Planck and Einstein discovered (and a few more for thermodynamic systems), which are no longer lineal but exponential equations, barriers where the system breaks, explodes and dies away, ‘crossing finally the barrier’ into the next world scale:

Now, the graphs, *explain the other huge conundrum of physics: why in the ‘steady state’ regions of those relative planes of size and time speeds, all is lineal, but when we go to the borders, equations break, and in the ‘transitional region’ the whole thing becomes hyperbolic.*

On the discontinuous verge between planes of space-time of the 5th dimension, the equations break and they are no longer lineal.

So they become hyperbolic geometries of exponential growth, unable to break the barrier of c-speed (relativity), temperature (violet catastrophe of radiation) and h-Planck quanta (uncertainty principle/limit).

Thus when you reach the limit between 5D planes, the region becomes catastrophic and you get the ‘barrier’ speed does no longer grows, but is absorbed as mass, temperature does no longer cools but it is converted in mass, frequency does no longer increases. And alas, once you cross the barrier you are again into a steady state region:

Simply stated, you MUST cross a discontinuous region between scales and things get rough, the previous parameters of time and space ‘are saturated’, you cannot longer increase your frequency, and speed, or you reach the inverse limit of 0 temperature, rest speed, and ‘cross between planes of 5D’ with NEW clocks and NEW time quanta.

You exist in a Universe roughly divided in 3 fractal, scales=planes of space-time, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale.

When you change scale, YOUR CLOCKS of time=formal motions change. So you move from quantum frequency of radiation to thermodynamic temperature clocks, and then again to speed motions. But *as you change clocks, obviously the ‘time tics’ are transformed, the previous time tick fades away *and the new time tic grows.

And those ‘discontinuous’ barriers in which we change of ‘parameters’ are signaled by a change in the lineal steady state graphs of mathematical physics that measure them.

So in the barrier between frequency and temperature you have the asymptotic ‘violet catastrophe’ of temperature≈radiation, which Planck found and made him postulate quantum theory; and on the other side, in the barrier between temperature clocks and speed, you have the c-barrier that made Einstein, discover Relativity theory, as the ‘simple equations of our thermodynamic world, where temperature is the clock of our activity (so hotter means faster in time, mammals vs. reptiles to put an example, solid vs. gas etc.) ‘break’.

Therefore a black hole is a gravitational implosive in-form-ative force vortex that ‘eats temperature’ and electromagnetic energy and converts it into ‘cold’ 0-temperature gravitational mass.

So black holes with 0-temperature when they grow fully into mass have 0 entropy.

**The fifth dimension from a discrete perspectives: networks of points.**

The Universe is made of infinite ternary a-symmetries of time/space motions/forms.

This is what we have learned so far. But the highest level of organisation of the Universe is that of topological space-time planes, 2-manifold structures put on layers that become 3 volumes with 3 type of motions and assemble into even larger systems, across deeper i±scales, piercing through the 5th dimension.

Welcome to the fundamental ‘space-time unit’, the bi-dimensional plane.

How can we interpret the interplay of points of timespace with motion and form we see around us, when we want to go beyond the actions of those points and its selfish point of view:

Answer, we transcend into U∆+1

The Union of infinite infinitesimal points of energy and information that give birth to a constant space-time plane.

**II. NON-Æ MATHEMATICS: DISCONTINUOUS PLANES ORGANIC NETWORKS**

** The formalism of Dual systems of energy and information**

All those facts must be formalized with new tools of mathematics and Logic. The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1^{st} postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks.

A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.

In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic.

It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.

Thus in this 2^{nd} lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.

What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.

Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.

What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.

This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.

What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4^{th} paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe.

However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.

Thus, the 4^{th} paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3^{rd }paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4^{th} paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 basic elements of geometry to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.

Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2^{nd} postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (3^{rd}postulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 4th postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum.

So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:

Sp>ST>Tƒ. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.

**A NEW R=EVOLUTION OF SCIENCE.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ *Steane*

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of space-time organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch*. *

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal, disordered space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its *combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.*

For that reason, we have added for good measure to the quote of Steane, the philosophical thought of Einstein, author of the previous paradigm of 4D space-time, which corresponds to the limit of this model in a single space-time continuum described with a single arrow of time, ENTROPY.

The truly interesting element of Mr. Steane’s definition is however in the final sentence, which is one of those magic clear-cut expressions of reality, coming out of nowhere, like the sentences of Schopenhauer with his intuitions for century to come. Mr. Steane simply understands there is a second arrow of time, information and somehow a third element, which he does not fully recognise but it is there, the third arrow of time, momentum – the present, iterative=repetitive conserved quality, mixture of the other two, which is what the Universe is all about: the reproduction and hence dynamic conservation of momentums composed of informative particles (masses and charges) and entropic motions (speeds), which we integrate into ‘conservative, closed energy world cycles’ – the whole trajectory, life or rather ‘existence’ of any event or process of nature.

In the graph we illustrate the 3 motions≈topologies of time-space.

It must be said a priori that we are here taken concepts of physics to a new level of philosophical understanding to describe the 3 arrows of time – so by entropy we mean the ‘disordered, expansive motion of space’ proper of big-bangs and deaths of matter. Since physicists have a very poor understanding of their concepts but an excellent mathematical praxis describing reality, they make a mess when we realise how different are their ‘dual concepts’.

So entropy is in philosophy of physics disorder, expansive gaseous states, and from here we take the concept, *enlarged to all scales, as philosophy of physics has done, but only to disorder, expansive motion, which are 1/3rd of the motions that take place in a ‘world cycle’ of time (you can consider it as ‘one of the diameters’ of the π-cycle)… *

*W*hile in statistical thermodynamics and mathematical physics (theory of information), entropy is a measure of the ‘ternary paths of future’ available to each ‘partition’ of an ensemble of molecules with a very defined mathematical equation, S=k lnΩ, which we will do properly explain in our introductory article on thermodynamics, and use the concept to study the causality and probabilities species have to take any of those 3 paths

. As systems, we shall find, can evolve only in three directions of space-time, in as much as there are only three type of ‘moving geometries’=topologies; limiting and guiding the ‘formal evolution’ of a system, which will either repeat itself in an iterative path; or warp, increasing its forms, its in-form-ation, in a vortex-like accelerated future, of higher frequency and lesser space, or inversely will expand in a decelerated explosion that erases its information. And we call this ‘big-bang’ death or dissolution of the system, the arrow of entropy and death.

So we clarify *with the guidance of the topological varieties of the Universe* and the foggy concepts of physicists, when interpreting its awesome beauty-equations.

Back to the duality of entropy-only theorists (physicists) and information only theorists (cybernetics), the fault is on the one-dimensional limited mind of man who has an aristotelian logic, of 0 vs. 1, true or false (ab. A-logic), which is NOT the i-logic structure of the Universe (ab. Non-Æ, non aristotelian time logic and non-euclidean fractal space).

So even before we go further to clarify also we are upgrading logic and maths from human single minds into the next ‘letter’, i, the logic of information, the logic beyond Æ, which is a logic of co-existence, between three elements of reality, entropy, information and its momentum-energy combinations in time, of co-exitence of three symmetric topologies of space, the limbs/fields of motion, the wave-bodies of energy and the particle-heads of information, and a logic of co-existence of three fractal scales of ‘being’ the ∆-1 atomic/cellular scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, ecosystemic/gravitational scale of physical and biological systems – we omit often for simplicity the third group of social disciplines with its 3 social classes, scales and topologies of nations and civilisations).

All what exists; all entities of the Fractal Universe including human beings are systems made of two COMPLEMENTARY geometries: languages and heads of information that perceive and guide blind bodies of moving energy.

And we can recognize those complementary puzzles of nature, called in the jargon of Systems Theory, Fractal Points, by their opposite, geometrical shape and properties. Since the cycle is the form that stores more information in lesser space and the line is the fastest distance between two points.

For example, all physical species are made of lineal fields of moving energy, shaped by cyclical particles of information.

All living organisms are made of planar bodies of moving energy guided by spherical heads of information.

All Human societies are made of human citizens, ruled by politicians and priests, who command nations and civilizations with legal and ethic words.

**The language of topo-bio-logical space-time beings; the supœrganism.**

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, Se and Ti. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

Let us of those postulates studied in detail in the sub-sections of ‘Space’, the organic meaning of the 4th postulate that defines a topological organic network.

Once the concepts of spatial energy and temporal information are properly defined, and the 5 postulates of Non-E Geometry understood we formalize a superorganism, as a particular case of the Generator equation of quantic energy and temporal information, Sp<=>Tƒ, which defines in this case the 4 fundamental elements of any super-organism:

Cellular units (S)

Networks of energy or organic, energetic space (∆+1 that create energy-body systems).

- Networks of information (Tƒ that creates information-brain systems)
- Networks that reproduce energy and information (<=>, that create organic, reproductive systems).

Reproduction can be external to the being, catalyzed by an enzymatic agent, as when men reproduce machines or DNA reproduce amino acids, or internal (then we talk of a living superorganism) Thus:

∑ E*nergy cycles/networks: Organic body<Flows of energy-information>∏ informative cycles.*

Where an E<=>T cycle is a feedback loop that engages energy and information quanta. So we affirm that:

*‘All natural entities are superorganisms that transform back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping space-time cycles: *∑*Spe<=>Tƒ’.*

Which allows us to unify the properties and structure of all *Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single *template *definition, according to which systems and super-organisms will *differ only in the degree of complexity of its networks and the specific energy or information we put into the template’s brackets and the size or complexity of its networks:

‘*A super-organism, (name a specific super-organism) is a population of (name a particular species), related by information networks (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy). A system is a partial super-organism, composed of a population of (name a particular species), related either by energy or information networks. A living super-organism is a super-organism in which the energy and information networks combine to achieve self-reproduction through a third, reproductive network.’*

Thus we classify all systems of the Universe in 3 scales of growing complexity, systems proper, super-organisms and living super-organisms.

Let us then use the previous template to define the main organic systems of the Universe, from the smallest form known to man, the atom, to the biggest one, the Universal Superorganism:

– *An atomic superorganism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy. *The atom is the simplest super-organism that starts the evolution of complexity in the Universe.

*– A molecular superorganism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Van der Waals forces). *

The biggest of those super-organisms are crystals, the most complex DNAs.

*– A cellular superorganism is a population of molecules, related by networks of water-based energy (cytoplasm, ribosome, cilium) and networks of genetic information (DNA-RNAs.) *Thus a Eukaryotic cell is a super-organism made of smaller cells (organelles) and carbohydrate molecules.

*– A human superorganism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems). *Recently we have discovered that human beings are hybrid super-organisms, as 90% of our cells and most of our genetic material belongs in fact to bacteria.

*– An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey). *And the entire sum of all those ecosystems is Gaia, the living super-organism of the Earth

– *A historic superorganism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.*

So History can be considered as the super-organism of mankind that extends in space over the Earth and in time, from the first man to the last man that will live in this planet.

*– An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc.).*

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic super-organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and includes 2 different species: human beings and machines.

*– A galaxy is a population of electromagnetic stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and light energy.*

-A Universe is a population of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and dark matter.

**I. 5D SYMMETRY BETWEEN PLANES OF EXISTENCE**

The Universe is a fractal of space-time actions. This simple truth originates all its complexity.

Planck discovered the Universe is made of quanta of a substance he called ‘action’ made of energy akin to lineal motion, locomotion and time, akin to cyclical motion, repetition of a cyclical form of in-form-ation. In his equations, Action = Energy x Time, in relativity where time was a simultaneous present moment, we see it as a bit of information, Action = Energy x Information.

So we are made of motion and form, energy and time cycles, and we reproduce through time cycles forms in motion, informations. We are all just waves of reproductive information, and when we are reproduced in herds, they assembly into a larger puzzle or fractal of self-similar forms, we call a fractal super organism, and this is the game of reality, of existences of worldcycles of energy and information, of space and time, E x I st , assembled into networks, and supeorganisms, a vital biological fractal game of re= productive creation of networks that become non-Æ planes that become superorganisms:

** EXISTENTIAL ÅCTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

**Short time åctions. The mandate of existence: keep your motions going, grow and multiply against all others.**

How can this be converted into individual actions of O-beings? Simply, by the fact that all systems seem to follow this law by trying to maximise their existence, in time and space, and the 5th dimension. That is all systems try to increase their absorption and emission of energy and information, (motion and form, | and O games): ±∆E,I, and try to form part of eusocial wholes, of clone herds and organisms that maximise its survival both as individuals and species: ±∆U.

Those are the 5 space-time actions, ∂a,e,i,o,u, we observe in all beings. And we can resume them in a simple formula.

**Γ. **Generator Equation of Time-space actions: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ,

Thus time motions at individual self-level can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ.

As each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information.

**The point with parts as a knot of space-time cycles≈arrows. The fractal point of i-logic geometry.**

Now each point of view, creator of a system of reference from where knowledge can be acquired, the original model of Descartes which only claimed to create a ‘world, that of his mind that thinks therefore exists.

The Point of view also ‘ex=ists’ and that is the function that makes him think. It will think and first perceive an external Universe In this case we can consider the first action that of perception:

∂o, when the point of view perceives, then it will act in its relative ±1 available upper and downward U-sub planes of the 5^{th} dimension with both of which TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF EXISTENCE, will perceive energy and information from diametrical non-commutative directions of the metric of its particular** fifth scale: **

In the graph the 2 directions of a flow of space-time along the 5^{th} dimension, is made through small actions ∂U±4, which related the Active Magnitude, U, to a lower plane from where *Tƒ*

will obtain: ∂I, ∂e bits & quanta. AND

**∑Tƒ:** information bits start a new point of perception, which if requiring relative motion will make the Tƒ expand its lower U-1 scales:

*∂e quanta* Motion

∑**U**:quanta expanded=disintegrated by Tƒ, which modulates that expansion to move relatively to its lower scale.

We use for the concept of a space-time cyclical action, in the attempt to gather similar concepts into strings of synonymous the following names:

space-time cycles ≈ time cycles ≈ Space-time actions ≈ time arrows ≈ existential cycles/actions ≈ knots of time cycles ≈ knots of time ≈ i-logic points ≈ functions of existences

The idea as usual is to merge jargons on the range that goes from the visual description of simpler points man perceives without form or eliminating their form – physical treatment of systems in external space-time, to the range of human self-perception, in which only the inner space-time actions and existential purpose matter to us.

So when we describe the feeding motion in the gravitational field of a star we care nothing for the internal space-time actions (feeding on energy) but for the motion, and on the other extreme of the range, when we talk of the feeding of a human being, we care nothing for the fork motions that carry the food to our mouth but for the internal sensations – the need to feed and the problem of hunger, the taste of the food and our inner sensations, the transformative ‘electroweak’ forces used to change the food into an elaborated product, etc.

So the geometric description talks of space-time cycles (closed, frequency cycles) or space-time lines (motions between frequency repetitions of those cyclical actions). The jargon of actions in space and arrows of time is an intermediate jargon proper both of physical and social sciences and the existential jargon is the jargon of relational space-time that applies to all.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time cycles constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms.

And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe. In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind.

In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

**We are made of space-time cycles traced within or between planes of 5th dimension.**

In true form, reality is NOT made of space, but the primary substance is ‘time’, time cycles that break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental theorem of knots and topology), *and that precise game of cyclical forms-motions that break and organize space into vital regions, harnessing its ‘energy-motions’ into forms is all what the Universe is about.*

*Thus relational space-time turns upside down our understanding of the Universe from a mere, simple spatial description where absolute time is a parameter of space, to a cyclical description where space is a slice in the flow of cyclical times, a region surrounded by a time cycle, a ‘path’ in a ‘Lagrangian’ of actions whose final sum is always zero, if we were to use some of the advanced concepts of physics we shall translate to the new paradigm; a ‘moment of present’, in the whole cycle from past to future that closes those paths.*

For the same reason, the minimal unit of reality is NOT a string of space, but an interval of cyclical time, specifically a cyclical ‘action’ with form, a bit of information. In physics from where we have borrowed heavily conceptual and mathematical terms to describe all space-time cycles, the unit is indeed an action of energy and time, which manifests itself in the 3 main U±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanic scales, as a Planck’s action, h, a temperature vibration or a force.

In cellular biology as a circadian cycle of transformation of energy and information, from an ATP to a genetic cycle.

In organic life as an action of feeding, informing, reproducing, evolving socially, moving, ∂a,e,I,o,u.

In society as a similar economic, cultural, social or military action of a nation or civilization.

Space is thus always a ‘minimal’ part of a time cycle.

This Kepler understood when it said that a line is merely a small part (a derived tangent we could say today in calculus) of a curve. This concept, of an infinitesimal part of a longer cycle, which becomes a straight interval, is ultimately the meaning of a present point, which we derive, in the same manner we obtain a Lagrangian worldcycle that sums zero with we integrate.

** EXISTENTIAL ACTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

How we travel through scales of the 5th dimension? Through the operations of integration and derivation, which is what makes emerge in an upper scale the physical action.

Now the simplest actions of motion are derivatives of the previous scales which emerge in the higher scale. And we can talk basically of two type of operations:

∂S-4=V-3; ∂V-3=a-2 This simple chain describes the meaning of physical actions. The gravitational scale of the ∆-4 perceived as distant space, gives part of its distance by deviating it in time, emerging as speed in the light-space, atomic scale, which gives part of its speed, by emerging in the upper molecular scale as acceleration and temperature. *So physical parameters are the elements perceived in the actions that emerge between scales.*

But those are ‘pure’ actions of motion, in the spatial dimensions of those lower scales.

We though by the Galilean paradox consider the Sp duality (space perception as pure distance, motion and acceleration, or complex perception as energy).

And so we have also the e-perception of those basic actions, which accordingly is symmetric.

∂E-4=momentum(∆-3); ∂p (momentum)∆-3 = mass (∆-2).

Thus again we observe that the ultimate energy of reality (stored in the distance of strings of gravitational forces, where S≈E, that is strings energy is equivalent to its length), emerges as momentum in the atomic scale and emerges as mass in the upper scales of matter. And so we define also *the main parameters of physics related to the complex energy-mass duality (perception in detail of the components of those scales) in terms of actions.*

The derivatives are also immediate: Energy =1/2Mv², and if we derivate considering V=X, the variable, we obtain the momentum of an atomic particle: ∂x²=2x.

Thus ∂E=mv=p. And again now if we derivate mv, considering v the variable, V=X, ∂p=m.

And we associate S≈E, V≈p and a=m. As we shall see in the specific analysis f the meaning of mass, *mass is considered a vortex of accelerated gravitational form. And this is one of the many parallel ways to deduce this fact. Since ∆ST is a perfectly symmetric complex structure of a beauty, order and balance…*

**The Fractal Universe: qualitative definition.**

What is the Universe? In simple, philosophical terms, a game of ‘motion’ and ‘form’. When you look around you observe ‘*forms in motion’ performing ‘åctions’, which combine both. And nothing else.*

Now call, motion | and form O, and its combination, Ø. And so you could in the simplest possible expression of reality to say that the Universe is ∑ – x O = Ø

This would be the simplest way to define it all. Scientists tend to quantify reality and so they have shunned for too long the explanation of the ‘whys’ of reality, of ‘its qualities’. We do both in ‘philosophy of science’. Now let us try to be more precise with the previous equation.

It could be called ‘speed’, V, a motion in ‘space’, and O could be called a cycle of form, a ‘clock’ of time.

So we could now say the Universe is made of infinite motions in space and cycles of time, combined into infinite åctions. And that is indeed what we perceive. Look around you. Or inside you. Beings perform ‘åctions’ which consist in going ‘cyclically’ to a place, to feed, to inform themselves to meet with other social beings, to reproduce… Actions are cyclical and they are performed through motions, which have certain form. Desargues a mathematician proved that all curves where in fact a combination of the line and cycle that created the cone. Computers use | and O, 1s and 0s, to model the entire Universe.

And if you realize all what is needed to trans-form, a lineal motion into a cyclical clock of time, is to close the ‘string of lineal motion’ into a ‘closed string’ of temporal form. In fact with those 2 elements, open and closed strings physicists construct all the particles of the Universe.

So this is another way to explain the meaning of any System of reality:

‘All what exists in the Universe are systems made of lineal motions of space and cyclical forms of time that trans-form into each other ad eternal throughout åctions that combine both:

∑|xO=Ø’.

**Quantitative definition**

This would be the simplest possible Universe. But then we realize that the motion is not just ‘pure motion’ at least in this plane of existence in which humans develop its åctions. But there is always a ‘being’ that is moving, which from an external point of view tends to be defined by ‘a mass’, an ‘inertia’, a ‘form’ that is fixed and the motion drags through. So we rather say that:

‘All what exits are forms that perform motions with form.’

What is mass so far escapes us at this stage, but all things around us have mass and move dragging their mass, so we should get a bit more complex and consider now that all what we see are masses moving in cyclical patterns around reality. And so we can write this with 3 ‘terms’, one for ‘mass’, M, one for cyclical motion, which is quantized with a term called frequency=1/T (that is the number of times per second a cyclical motion completes its cycle), and a 3rd term called ‘space’, the space traversed in lineal terms from the initial point to the final point. So a being is a mass moving from point A to B in space and performing in time cyclical trajectories: M x L x T ‾ ¹

As it happens, physicists describe all what exists in this plane of reality with only those 3 parameters, M, L and T, and have a fundamental postulate, that the quantity of M x L x T ‾ ¹ of the Universe which they call ‘momentum’, remains invariant when we add all the momentums of all the beings of the Universe.

And so the quantitative way to express the qualitative nature of the Universe is rather simple too: The Universe is a game of ‘momentums’ in perpetual exchange of motion and form.

The reader would observe at this point that humans use a lot of ‘different’ concepts, which at the end tend to be reduced to motion and form. And this a problem of humans which love to make specific definitions, attach differentiating terms, break reality according to quantitative methods, classify, divide and confuse.

The Universe though works in a different manner, it breaks, quantizes and multiplies into:

- An infinite myriad of varieties or Ø-åctions, the 2 essential realities it is made of:
- Lineal motions that expand and create open lines and planes of space.

- And O-cyclical motions or ‘forms’, which shrink, warp and close into time clocks.

So if we want truly to understand what reality is made of. We must depart from those essential things. And called the Universe a ‘fractal’ which iterates and combines lineal motions of Space, and cyclical clocks of time into infinite åctions. We can now change from the intuitive geometric symbols to the conventions of man and so write Se (for Space) and Tƒ (for cyclical clocks of time) our equation:

Se x Tƒ = A.

And this is the simplest way to explain it.

**The combinations of motions and forms.**

What makes though the Universe so confusing is the fact that it constantly messes motion and form. And so at least in this plane of existence there is nothing ‘pure’. This the old Taoists, the philosophers of antiquity that understood in simpler closer terms this reality, calling motion yang which they represented with a ___ and form yin, which they represented with a O or a broken line — (with more form than __), make it clear, when affirming that no yin exists without a bit of yang, and no yang exists without a bit of yin, and that reality, existence was a game of combinations of yin and yang that created the infinite beings of reality.

**The o±4 plane.**

So we are obliged to use the purest terms of motion and form, only when dealing with the purest concept of pure Space without form in nature vacuum space and pure cyclical clocks of time without any translatinv motion, pure rotatory clocks, in nature, black holes in the cosmic scales and superfluid 0 K vortices of mass and charges without any vibration. And as it happens we cannot perceive those limits of pure motion without form and pure form without motion, pure Space and Time.

Now I shall call our ‘plane of existence’, where I exist. the individual, human plane, the ∆-plane. And so this remote plane which I don’t even perceive, will be called the 0±4 planes, the ∆-4 plane that of far away forces with zero form, the gravitational plane, and the plane of remote black holes with maximal form at 0 K, which I don’t perceive either the ∆+4. It is only logic to call them with the same ± number, because as it happens, the gravitational plane of absolute motion with no form (called for that reason non-local or ‘action at distance’) is created by the plane of absolute form with no motion (called for that reason a black hole).

How this is done is obvious. Remember that we said all what exists are O x | = Ø. So what happens here is this

O (black holes) emit, |, gravitational space, which other O black hole will absorb, creating between both a gravitational attractive force. So we write:

[O (Tƒ) < = > O]±4.

Where we have added the plane in which this happens to know what varieties of ‘form’ and ‘motion’ we are talking about.

The duality of distance and motion, cycle and form.

Now, because we do not see this gravitational lines and we do not see this perfect cycles, but they are there, they must appear somehow to us. And they do so, lines of pure motion are seen as ‘distances’, and cycles of pure rotational cyclical motion are seen as ‘masses’ and ‘spherical forms’. We can picture how this happens, since we have two elementary realities, the Tƒ cyclical clock (which we perceive as fixed form, like when we see a very fast turning wheel that we see as a fixed form) and the – of space, which we can see as distance or motion, as we see fast cars in a picture at night as fixed lines or motion.

This is thus an important law of reality we call the Galilean paradox: when we do not see in detail a lineal motion a speed it appears as distance, and when we do not see in detail a cyclical clock of time, a rotary motion, we see it as a mass of form. So Galileo didn’t see the motion of the Earth but only the distance it travelled around the sun, neither its rotation but only its mass-form, and yet it was there: e pur si muove e pur no muove.

So we must make two equivalences:

Lineal motion = Space distance; Rotary motion = Time Clock.

And so we see either motions, lineal speeds and rotary clocks of time, or fixed distances and forms.

And the result is the stable combination or ‘space-time’ reality we see around us.

Further on an interesting deduction of the fact we do NOT see gravitational motion, is that it must appear to us as infinite ‘non local or action at distance, as physicists call it.

Indeed, if we consider the equation of :

– x O = Øst, whereas Øst is the constant space-time we see around us. For Øst to be constant, since O the form we see is zero, none, the – element must be infinite.

As the only quantity multiplied by 0 that gives as a constant value is ∞:

∞ x 0 = C. And this is indeed what we experience: gravitational forces have zero form, and are infinite in its motion from the human perspective. We do not mean they are necessarily infinite in objective terms, but for humans they are infinite in motion, non local, ‘acting at distance’, the neat expression physicists used for centuries without reasoning why.

Now we bring this solution because I believe the reader trained in ‘quantitative’ methods will surely miss the essential element of ∆ST – to mix logic reasoning and mathematical equations to achieve a much more complex, rich and meaningful understanding of the Universe with all its languages, not only as an abstract concoction of mathematical formulae. The previous ‘sample case’ is a simple, clear proof of that power of ∆ST to enlighten our comprehension of all realities.

**The ∆-3 scale.**

So in the next stage of reality, beyond this ∆-plane of existence that we do not perceive, which we shall call, the 0±4 Plane, of pure forces of motion, ‘gravitational forces’, ∆-4, and pure form without motion, ‘cosmic black holes’ or 0±4, the rest of realities are ‘messed up’. Their motions have some form and their forms have some motion. And so they are all Ø-species. And we call them ‘waves’.

Indeed, when we come to the minimal reality we perceive, we realize it is made of pure motions which have a bit of form, that is their ‘lines of space in motion’, their gravitational lines curve up and down as they move linearly’, and they become ‘transversal waves’ of light. And then alas! they are now ‘light-space’, forms in motion, forms in action, in-form-åctions, in-form-ations. And so ‘light-space’ carries information, and it is the ‘limit of our perception’. And we call this plane of existence, which is the first we perceive the ∆-3 plane of electronic light. The beginning of the human universe. And so the myths of the bible said ‘and God said, there is light’ and creation started. Indeed, when gravitational forces of the ∆-4 scale warp into transversal waves, which carry information, or ‘light-space’, we enter reality.

This ‘light space’ in turn will be made by ∆-3 galaxies, which produce this light space.

And we call them the ∆+3 plane according to our terminology of planes of existence.

And so if we look at it from the ‘smallish’ point of view, the ∆-3 plane is made of the components of most of the matter of the galaxy: plasma particles, electrons and protons in ionized state, mixed up with electromagnetic fields of light. And from the larger point of view we will be talking of galaxies.

They are the next clear thing beyond the Universe and its dark matter, dark energy and dark black holes we do not see

Now here, we shall by ‘isomorphism’ (similarity) with the ∆-4 scale consider some facts, which have escaped for very long the work of physicists in their understanding of reality.

If we have said that the space of the ∆-4 scale is actually pure motion, seen as distance by lack of detail, the space of galaxies, must be made of light, which we do see, but not with enough detail to perceive its motion, and so we also perceive ‘light-space’ as distance. This is our ‘space’ and accordingly the space we see has exactly the same 3 perpendicular, Euclidean components that light have because both are the same:

In the graph, we can see this straightforward. It is not a coincidence that the 3 elements of light, its magnetic, electric fields and its speed are perpendicular to each other as our ‘Euclidean space is’. This physicists do not really understand, because they just do quantification with maths, and as Feynman famously put it, ‘the why’ is the only thing physicists do not ask. Curiously enough philosophers did understand, so Kant said that our space-light is Euclidean, and Descartes said we see the ‘world’ of light with Euclidean coordinates in his book ‘the world’, and draw the Cartesian space-time graph of light space. And artists understood it, so the impressionists said they paint light when they paint space. Again an important insight by using more than numbers to explain reality.

Next the equation with our geometric symbolism of this scale, will be also rather simple;

[O < ≈ > O]0±3

In simple terms, a ‘particle’ or ‘star’ or ‘galaxy’ with cyclical form O, produces a wave ≈ of light space, which another O-being will perceive and absorb. (Remember at this time we do see and all systems that emit light do perceive; your mind is nothing but a bunch of electrons perceiving light).

Remembers also that we have said the Universe has only 2 ultimate simple elements, O and – and its infinite Ø combinations, but it likes to iterate them, repeat them, mix them together, group them in huge numbers. So that equation can mean an extraordinary number of beings of different sizes. The most common interpretation when we enter in detail will be that of Physicists, which they call the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

O-Fermion particle < Boson Force > O-Fermion particle.

Where a fermion, electron or quark will emit a boson a gamma ray and another fermion will absorb it.

There are a few other varieties of ‘forces’ and ‘fermions’ but roughly speaking without entering in detail this ‘is it’. (Remember this blog has 3 ‘planes of explanation’ the upper line very general and encyclopedic, resumes the entire thing; so if you read it you will have a generic vision of the whole reality but still a bit fogged, this second line of isomorphisms, gives you more detail and the 3rd line dedicated to each plane with very detailed references to scientific laws of each species, do connect fully with simplex sciences).

- Now the second thing physicists do know but again interpret in too abstract ways, is the fact that the equation works both sides: the electron produces a boson – a photon of light that moves through a transversal wave that carries motion and form, and gets to another electron, where it collapses being absorbed by the electron into a dense photonic form, which becomes part of the nebulae of the electron.

Thus what happens here which they describe with mathematical artifacts called probabilities in quantum equations they do not know what they mean, is clear, if you are not ‘cuckoo’ about having weird interpretations of reality that make you sound very smart and reinforce your beliefs in an only-mathematical Universe. This i know will irritate physicists, people which as the adults of ‘le petit prince’ believe they know everything and don’t see the elephant in the hut. Well, Schrodinger who discovered all this, first told us that the electron is smeared all over the place. And it is. it is made of very dense boson light photons that collapse from ≈ state into O-state, and come together into the nebulae we see.

Now, when we observe them, with even bigger particles, the smeared electron, collapses further into a tighter ball, as it happens when any system of nature made of fractal points (anything is a fractal point, a number, a group of any set of beings), receives a massive interfering attack from outside. Flocks of birds, schools of fishes, armies spread on a battle field, collapse into tighter configurations when a predator eagle, a shark, an enemy come to attack them.

So the densely packed photons of the electron nebulae collapse, around the point where there is a maximal density at this moment of dense photons and become a particle point, when the killer electron of the microscope bombs it. Simple enough to explain in a perfectly intelligent manner, the weird things – not so weird if you believe in the isomorphism=equality of all systems of the universe – and have been a soldier, or have seen a school of fishes, a bird flock, a herd in the savanna, an at hill – that happen in quantum physics.

This is what it happens: nebulae of densely packed groups of photons, spread to form together ∑∆-1 photons = ∆-electrons gather around the denser point of the flock in the moment the observer’s electron bomb it, and so quantum physicists say that point is the most probable point to find the electron as a particle-point. And they are puzzled because they never detect the nebulae but a particle point, so they unable to grasp the vitality of the entire universe affirm that the nebulae is a mathematical reality made of probabilities of finding the electron. Yes, each point will have a probability according to its density, as the probability that a school, a flock, an army or an ant group gathers in a point is proportional to the density of that point prior to the attack, as it is the fastest way to become a ball, coming together where there are already a lot of points. Point.

So this is enough to know now about this plane and its equations.

Tƒ mention though that because light has information, form, it is no longer infinite in speed. It must have a limited speed, because now we see it so, O x – = Constant Øst does not need to be infinite. Further on, because what is happening here is that light ‘draws’ space-motion, as it has to draw a curve is slower. Indeed, the fastest distance between two points is a line, a wave is slower than a line, as it has a longer trajectory. So light has a limit of speed. It is called c-speed, and is huge but limited.

However, this distance-speeds of light once they abandon the galaxy, no longer are in the light-space realm so they start to elongate, becoming red waves, the ones with longer distance per wavelength, and hence they start to accelerate, which we see as an increase of space-distance, and so between galaxies space-distance grows at an accelerated rate as the light expands space, and this again physicists measure but don’t understand, it is the expansion of light space. We could say that light space dies into the gravitational strings it was made of. And so the immortal, infinite black holes and gravitational infinite distances of the Universe now warp into light which have a finite light-space speed and a finite time duration as it is born from a pure motion that warps into form and then spreads out again when abandoning the galaxy into pure motion again:

– > ≈ < – and this is a life cycle. Notice now the 2 symbols we add here which are visual also: > which means something with more distance, collapses into a point, and this is the symbol of creation of form, of formation, of in-form-ation, and on the other side < is the symbol of expansion of form into motion, or entropy.

And here again those to dynamic process of change in time, are ‘called appropriately the two arrow of time -> and <-, information and entropy. Physicists unfortunately only recognize one, the bad one, <- entropy expansive motions, which is the reason they say the Universe is dying. Because they only study the space between galaxies. It seems silly, very dumb, but physicists beyond manipulating equations and making machines to perceive reality are very dumb. Sorry that is ‘a fact’. Or rather very arrogant in their conclusions (which makes them be very dumb)

Fact is the whole Space-time, remember O x – =Øst is in perpetual balance.

So the expansion of accelerated light space between galaxies is compensated by the warping of light space into photons, then electrons and matter within galaxies, which is so evident looking at those galaxies corrugating light space into warping black holes, that one wonders how blind physicists can be?

They seem to see the only thing nobody sees, dark expanding space and they do not seem to see what all of us see, warping galaxies. And so:

∑ (O-galaxies < ≈–≈> O) is the equation for the sum of all the galaxies emitting expansive light, ≈ which becomes gravitational faster distances, – between galaxies and then reenter another galaxy and collapses.

Easy. Now you can throw in to that model all the correct equations of quantum physics, relativity and cosmology and you will get the details. The whys are only in this blog.

**Some clarifications on physical errors.**

All this brings us to the almost impossible need to correct ‘physical concepts’ which truly deform in favor of action, motion and other fundamental traits of the worldly religion of physicists (to make weapons and of late machines that use energy to move) that have transpired to all sciences.

Consider for example, my lost battle to redefine and reduce the concept of energy to entropic, lineal motion transfers.

In physics, the fundamental concept is ‘energy’, which never changes. This is its fundamental law.

For long I have tried to ‘change’ that ‘enclose-∆- all saint grail concept’ of energy, and reduce it to a mere ‘transfer’ of lineal, spatial motion, and redefine the principle as ‘lineal energy motions constantly transform into cyclical informative motions back and forth’. But I realize this has only produced rejection from physicists that have the big issue of arrogance – that is, trying to explain everything else with the specific limits of material systems. So i am into the painful, long process of rewriting every time i put ‘energy’, and substitute it for ‘entropy’, the spatial, expansive arrow of motion. To physicists in that sense all is entropy and informative life processes are called ‘negantropy’, not information, the arrow they ignore.

So they do with the ‘Reprod-Active’ 3^{rd} present arrow of repetitive åctions that combine energy, sorry entropy and information, and when repeated many times, reproduce a system. Entropy only physics, its biggest conceptual error though makes sense in external physical systems, where most changes are changes in motion in space. In this view, ‘energy’ which they basically define as a transfer of lineal motion through the formula of Work (that only takes the lineal direction in which the force is applied as the component of motion).

And there, they include also potential energy, stored in the form, or information of systems, from mass Sp=mc2, to position (in a gravitational field). Thus in physics ‘energy’ is really all, it is the existential force of the system, as it includes both its ‘kinetic energy’ (which is the concept i had failed to reduce energy to), but also ‘form’, vortices-clocks of accelerated time, charge and masses, which transform their form into ‘kinetic energy’.)

The reader of these texts therefore should forgive the author who calls ‘entropy’ energy, expansive lineal motion.

As physicists are the popes of science, we yield to them, and I will correct in the future all those terms of ‘energy’ and substitute them for entropy. And we will use the physical concept of ‘energy’ as existential force, Max. Sp X Tƒ, of a system. Which is really what they mean when they say mass is a form of energy. In true ‘form’ is not, Mass is a vortex of information, the particle state of the cosmic Universe, and energy is its opposite variety. So the reader should realize this minor error, and read ‘entropy’ when I say energy, a word I will try to eliminate.** **

**EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things though are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

**SOCIOLOGICAL SCALES**** **

**∆o**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

** ****We are an integration of space-time cyclical åctions performed across those o±4 planes of existence.**

*A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:*

*O-1, ∑O-1>Si<ST>Tƒ<<So-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.*

*If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (æ,e,ï,œ,û) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being.*

We need now to see how space-time fields, ‘lines with motion’, momentums, the commonest st manifold, either an Le (Long-energy-entropy), Tƒ, Tall Information and Wa, Wide-Reprod-active Wave bidimensional system with an spatial and temporal dimension.

Now the bidimensional ST systems follow the natural laws of topology, and are a bidimensional motion, perceived as a line of space with a speed that will define in an external field its ‘reproduction of information’ as it traces its motions in the external absolute space-time.

The simplicity of integrating a worldcycle path on those 3 bidimensional systems

Worldcycle, similar to a Hamiltonian :

- 3 W = ∫ Le x Tƒ d(st) = ∑ a = 0

Any world cycle: W, thus will transit through the existential ±,∫ æ,e,ï,œ,û, åctions of the being with different increasing length of time and space.

The motions in ∂a, accelerated, decelerated and steady state caused by the perceptive åctions, ∂I, which have perceive external cycles and accumulated it in logic thoughts to enact them in the future, are directed towards a field of energy, from where to extract bits of existential momentum to deliver forceful impulse into the future.

All this mechanical åctions though have a clear goal> Energy is always transformed into potential forms of information. Which is the new principle of internal and external energy:

Sp = External Energy (kinetic energy), internal-external energy (internal energy of the external Universe: Potential Energy) + Internal energy (vital energy and cyclical information of the being)

Is a quantity which is conserved. Since it includes angular momentum, lineal momentum, we can perceive in this manner different conservation laws of physics.

Where the worldcycle function of relative present, ∑ or W, for width-summation, will be constantly used to represent the constant steady state balanced space-time function, made of åctions

in a wide analytic equation, would give us obviously a lot of information on the system. Enough to say now that the 3 variation space-time fields are simplified by the fact that almost always Length-entropy, height-information and width-reproduction follow this harmony simplification of bidimensional space-time fields.

There are though also other inverted functions, for example, an Lo dimension, which is a cycloid, a cyclical wheel which moves along a lineal path tracing an 8 Radius longer wave cycle, combination of both.

The body wave, reproductive Past x future, energy x information, system is thus the more complex, variable and interesting of all of them.

And we could consider its worldcycle between birth and extinction, form its first beat of existence to its last, the ‘present existence’ of a being. We are bodies, our heads in the future with information are invisible particles, our limbs absorb its energy and information from the external Universe with its hyperbolic openings, but the being is its body-wave, its reproductive organ for whom the being mostly exists.

Of the 5 åctions of existence, reproduction, the preservation of the relative present is the highest of all mandates.

In existential algebra we write:

Present (angular momentum: Mvr, in physical equations, or ‘action’) = Past (energy) x Future (information), whose operational functions, of which the Hamiltonian, Lagrangian are the most relevant of physics, try to combine this anti-symmetric equation (as both are inverse functions, hence Past / Future = Constant.

Now if we are calculating past x future, whereas Past = Constant Future, P = C x F.

And we would obtain:

*Present*= Constant x Future x Future =*C F*^{2}

A fundamental equation of all time Physics.

While for Past we can calculate:

Past = C F

And obviously Future = F

It is then interesting to observe that knowing the future, measuring the future space-time point (external or internal of a being) allow us to deduce the past, and relatively consider the Present, which will be more variable (as now the future has 2 possible solutions from the present point, as there are in fact 2 possible decisions to be made in the present. That is, the present can choose to increase any of its 2 components future information or past energy.

This always-dual solution to a point of space-time or first degree of freedom increases the external uncertainty on when the point of time, will make discontinuous its cycles of space-time action, switching to another different active integral path, that might even cancel the first.

Entities thus travel through a multiple Universe with different regions with different dimensions. How travel through such 5^{th} dimensional fractal Universe filled with nested sub-universes of different symmetric past and present and future, Sp, A, O, dimensions of spacetime

The relationship between a bidimensional space field and a bidimensional time cycle, is also a 2-manifold.

However cutting each other with a single dimension of connection as they intersect in a creative wave-particle encounter, is fundamentally an A x Sp, Active magnitude x accelerating field of kinetic energy (perceived as its derivative speed by the active magnitude) : M x V – a momentum.

A second fundamental new element of cyclical time is the cyclical nature of the relative fractal past-present-future dimensions of space time, in world cycles which means that the future return to the past by means of the action of death.

Past x Future = Present-> Energy x Information -> wave-reproduction/momentum, is the kind of new quantized time equations that will be able to reveal an enormous numbers of facts and whys of science.

Now the study of that previous equation, which is the perception of the Universe, from a different time frame of reference, *as if the past and the future co-exist together in the manufacturing of present, as it actually happiness in reality, creating an immortal Universe in a perpetual present is a high discipline of physics of time.*

Since to exist through åctions that ensure the immortality of the system, by absorption and reproductive emission of energy and information is the fundamental purpose of time cycles.

Thus we shall elaborate its concept, as it is truly in the ‘åctions of space-time’ that all beings perform, where we shall find the whys of the Universe.

Thus the whys of reality are the active, biological purposes of most time cycles, performed by existential beings, whose geometric forms drawn in space are secondary to the ‘biological functional nature’ of those ‘space-time åctions’.

Since those cycles will be the 5 ‘drives of existence’ that ensure the entity:

– ∫o, perceptive, gauging, to move towards…

– ∂a: accelerated fields where

– ∂e, to feed in energy, and store it to.

≈i, reproduce and achieve immortality within

±∫u: a social stronger group.

And those topo-biological whys, performed by all kind of systems, including physical systems to ensure mechanically or vegetative its survival.The sum of all the planes of increasing information of parts that become wholes, of knots of space-time cycles that are joined by networks into systems and super organisms IS the arrow of SCALAR SPACE-TIME, or relative 5th dimension (if we consider the 4 classic ones of physics though as we shall see this is a simplistic confusing nomenklatura, better substituted by the ternary symmetries between space topology, S, time age, T, and space-time scale, ∆ which is a future time arrow ∑∆>∆+1, of eusocial evolution, of potential forms, which might or might not happen but if happening will have certain non-Æ forms that are set as the most efficient survival forms of a given ternary topology of existence.

So a being will be the sum of all the planes and super organisms, floating and occupying a limited domain of that dimension, as its internal knots trace its world cycles, sum of fractal quantum motions, or ‘∆-1 actions’ of the being in its internal space, as they transfer energy and information from the outer, ∆+1 world:

∆=∫∆±1

Whereas a being, ∆, is the sum of exchanges of energy and information between its outer world, ∆+1, and its inner world, ∑∆-1, which is what beings do through its existence: absorb and emit energy and information between its inner world and outer world.

In this experience the being will show 2 selfish arrows of accumulation of energy and information in its internal territories and at the same time trying to minimise its output of both:

Max. Spe x Tiƒ

Yet the mind, Œ≈Ø, function (in timeT: Œ and space: Ø), of the being while trying to maximise its body energy and mind information it might exchange in unfavourable conditions with larger stronger wholes, and by the simple reason that wholes are more than Is in space-time size and volume, finally loose the game of existence and loose its capacity to regenerate its energy, collapsing into death.

Min. Spe x Tiƒ: Max. Spe x O Tiƒ=Death equation.

Thus an existential cycle ends with the fall back into dissolution of the being that existed and that ultimate reality: that all existences in time are closed zero point travels between 3 planes of the 5th dimension, resumes all reality:

**Life death cycle: its 3 ages is a trip across 3 co-invariant scales of the 5th dimension**

So we talk of a 5th dimension, which orders reality according to its growing sizes, and paradoxically, slower time motions. As we grow in space we diminish in speed, and yet both properties put together are invariant:

**Λ. 5D metric:** Sp x Tƒ =Constant; Sp= K/Tƒ ; Sp (Past-energy) < Present-iteration: Sp x Tƒ>Tƒ future information;

|-Sp (energy age, field, gas, youth) > Sp x Ti (liquid, adult, wave, reproductive age)>Tƒ (3rd age, particle solid) <<Sp (death).

All systems do travel through the 5th dimension performing 3 basic motions:

- Present translations performing time actions in space, along the same Universal plane.

- Past, transfer of energy and information upwards towards higher social scales.

- And transfers of energy and information downwards.

Those 3 motions, performed in infinitesimal, indivisible cycles made of tics of time and quanta of energetic space form together a sequential world cycle of life and death – as the point is a super organism in existential mode.

And so the integration of all those motions through the world cycle, Ω, of the whole system, in a life-death duration. Yet the same structures considered in space, gave us a ternary form, or super organism, made of energetic, reproductive and informative parts. And so departing from a single Œ point, through its existential travels and synchronicities, we can tell the tale of the Universe: the creation and extinction of wholes from parts, which perform space-time actions, which are motions that exchange energy and information through the 5th dimension.

And so the motions of each point of each scale can all be traced and included in a larger frame of reference of multiple space-time symmetries.

It is though needed to understand how the arrows o information and energy emerge and download between the fractal planes of the 5th dimension. Hence we need a 3rd symmetry to fully grasp the behaviour of the species of the Universe.