**Foreword: The enhanced scientific method.**

**ABCDE**‘ Principles of the Scientific method, which ads the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms), the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE structure that results of the multiple nature of time-space dimotions to the classic elements:

*the 3 ad-ons to ‘Data-Correspondence-Experimental method’ caused by cyclical time and fractal space, which are non-Æ: i-logic geometry, organic, Biological models and Disomorphisms, are wraped up in*the Disomorphic method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or a shorter version – the analysis of the system through its 5 CAUSAL DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTION, or ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.

*fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.*

*anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time.*

*studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause.*

*So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-preent-future world cycle block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.*

**¬A(bcd)E**xtraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.

*as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite.*

**∆±¡: The organic Universe**

**4th & 5th Ðimotions****: ****∆±¡: Entropy & evolution. Its metric.**

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

In the graphs ‘5th dimension metric’ and its ‘Ðisomorphic’ laws apply to ALL PLANES of existence of reality ,each one studied by a stience, according to size. We observe the main physical and Socio-Biological Superorganisms of space-time whose ternary ∆§±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the atomic, ∆-1 (cellular, individual), ∆º:magnetic /thermodynamic, (organic or national in biological and social systems) and ∆+1 gravitational (ecosystemic or world in biological and social systems).

It is precisely the existence of a 5D metric what pegs those ternary planes together and allows *its synchronicity and simultaneity as energy and information can travel between those scales **according to the definition of a ‘space-time’ dimension.*

In that regard, NOT all planes of the Universe follow the *same metric equations, but certain families of related species do, which allow their symbiosis and social evolution. *So we can assess the existence of a *super organism, *like the galaxy or a biological organism, when the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size remains co-invariant in 3 relative ∆§±I scales – which will be ‘tighter’ form smaller systems, and as large as the whole range of perceived scales from the quantum potential (∆-4) to the cosmos (∆+4) in the galaxy: ** $t x ð§=K**

Regarding quantitative measure of those dimensions, the simplest obvious way to measure a lineal spacetime, $t is ‘distance’, and a time clock, ƒ, frequency, which gives us the definition of a wave, λ($t) x ƒ (ð§) = K. But the beauty of the use of the 5 Dimotions, in a general way departing from its vital, conceptual perception, is the wide range of phenomena we can use to represent them.

It is the previous law general and how does it work for different dimotions of time or combinations of demotions is then a general field of inquire with important results and exceptions to the general rule of the inverted properties of a form in motion state, time vs. space dualities. And so on. What *it is general though is the general law of time space organisms:*

“L*aws of dimotions apply to all systems regarding of the absolute value of its self-centered scale, ∆ø’ *

So the laws we establish for demotions of particles, molecules, matter systems, organisms or societies are the same.

The metric is then a metric for a family of similar entities that enter into an organic relationship across an ∆ø±¡ scale, where ø can have any ¡ value, each defining a stience.

On the other hand K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the co-invariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).

We cannot overextend in this introduction on the them of 5D metric, studied in other posts in more detail, but a few examples of biological and physical super organisms will suffice to observe the importance of this discovery.

First we already noticed that as smaller systems carry more information, in its faster cycles, *smaller scales code larger ones, genes code organisms, humans code civilizations and quantum numbers called atomic systems. *

Next we can observe a direct biological and physical example of the existence of such ‘phyla’ of related species, which follow a given 5D metric (in the fractal Universe by definition as Einstein noticed in physics all laws have a ‘local diffeomorphic symmetry’:

In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity and due to the obvious incapacity of): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.

So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’ – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.

Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).

In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.

On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time:

** λ ($t) x ƒ (ð§) = K** equation is the ‘canonical equation of a wave in its locomotion or 2nd dimotion of space-time’.

Such dimension exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information). And a key ‘introduction’ to Dimotion’s formalism is the study of the previous equation and its related definition of the dimotion in terms of speed (v=s/t) NOT only for that Dimotion but for all the Dimotions of the Universe.

Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.

So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).

SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²)

So this blog will not only correct and improve our view of the Universe but far more importantly make us understand life, man and history much better than we do today.

Organic space-time beings co-existing in several scales, define themselves each ∆§cale ‘STiences, that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric.

Let us then consider those ∆§cales from different ‘Rashomon points of view’ of the whole ‘entangled’ T.œ: ∆§ðø±¡

And then consider how humans look as timespace organisms (ab. T.Œs), guided by both arrows of time, motion≈entropy and in/form/ation and the Ðisomorphic laws of all those T.œs.

# ∆§

**10 logarithmic scales.**

To notice that the 5th dimension is based on 10 logarithms because the ‘Tetraktys’ is the most perfect group of 3 x 3 + 0 elements, which become specialised in the ‘Sp-energetic, Tƒ- informative and ST-reproductive, iterative functions of the ‘Program of survival’ of all systems, which will be made clear latter on, when we analysed the world cycles of time and the ternary Generator equation in space and time, of the fractal Universe.

You have to be a bit patient, as we have first to ground all this in some basic mathematics. Thus between 2 such scales of the 5th dimension we shall always find around 10¹¹ elements – the ties of a DNA molecule, the stars of our galaxy, the cells of a super organism, the galaxies of the perceived Universe, and between the Universal Constants of Space, we will find the same differences, the energetic value between the H-planck constant of Tƒ in the ∆-1 quantum scale and the k-Boltzmann constant of the ∆-Thermodynamic, human scale; and then the µ-magnetic scale and so on.

So this said, the 5^{th} dimension is in the holes of the real numbers each of its decametric decimal a lower scale of the 5^{th} dimension. Yet as usual those numbers should be really cut every 10 ‘decimals, because then we enter into another scale where anyway the values of constants such as Pi, and √2 vary as Lobachevski’s proved.

This is made clear just by revising a simple number, e, but a key number for the derivative, proportional emergence or descend between scales, approximately 2.718281828. to the 9^{th} decimal. The reader will observe that actually those 10 numbers form a simple series, 2.7 18 28 18 28 repetitive in extreme (except the first decimal missed by one to make it a perfect 28-18 variation, but after the 10^{th} decimal it breaks, with 2.7 18 28 18 28 45904 etc. That is, the equivalent to the loss of meaning and yet one more of the so many proofs I have found of the existence of the 5^{th} dimension, its geometries, algebras, and mind forms, circular membranes, points of view and ternary organic parts.

Indeed, e ^{x}= [(1+1/n)^{n}] ^{x} is the only derivative which is proportional to the same number, since if we take 1 the whole and n, one of its finitesimal parts, in space, a quanta, and then repeat this growth of diminution an n number of time, and an x number of social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, we shall find the emergence processes or dissolution≈ death processes of most systems of the Universe.

The quantitative scales however always yield in its meaning to the functions, and ternary symmetries we shall discover that make possible the existence of all systems as combinations of 3 ‘scales of the 5th dimension’ (quantum-cellular, thermodynamic-organic, gravitational-social), 3 synchronous topologies and 3 diachronic ages, so we soon will write the Generator Equation of Space-time Beings:

**Γ.** ∆-1: $t (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ∆:∑e∏i (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥∆+1: ð§ (future, informative head/particle)

This simple structure and all its fractal variations is essentially the description of any World-system, whose sum creates the Universe: U=∑ω

Relational space-times thus have the key word ‘relational’, which merely means we need a ‘metric system’ to order and relate all those space-time cycles of the Universe.

And this is the 5^{th} dimension of the Universe: the metric laws that put and order, RELATE to each other all the time-space cycles of the Universe, of which we are all made.

The causation of the fifth dimension is in the mind-mapping of the singularities that introduce a ‘perpendicular order’ with a series of functions in space and time – namely the creation of topological networks departing of fractal points with an inner value of relative stillness and density of form that is the concept behind a mind-singularity that reflects its inner mapping and language into the external world.

Without those reduced software images of reality and the mirror effect of the mind that reflects the image into an attempt to order the Universe to the image and likeness of the singularity there would not be need for a fractal structure of parts made of smaller images of the whole with more form and less motion.

Motion we might say expands the range of our perception of the self, facilitating the enlargement of the image-seed-of information giving origin to the fifth dimension.

# ∆@

If *time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.*

So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them.

As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).

All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.

As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

**The organic, metaphysical view. **

Of the 3 scales of reality the ¡-1 scale is perceived as a sum of euclidean points, which is achieved when the ‘finitesimal’ becomes an indistinguishable point on the ‘whole’, which appears then as a continuum.

This is the most reductionist process that damps the ‘vital properties’ of the points as a ‘mass’ from the larger view of the systems.

Unfortunately it is the commonly used procedure in current Euclidean science of points with no parts – which is shameful, specially in Social Sciences and economics, where humans are tagged with ‘prices’, as ‘objects’ of a wholesale process of reduction of ‘human heads’ to economical points of ‘credit’ and ‘profit equations’, a fact which 5D sciences thoroughly rejects as we shall see on the analysis of U+1 eco(nomic)systems.

And yet, that is how the Universe works, specially when the social scientists does not ‘operate’ on its structure to enhance the power of individual human points.

As Shakespeare put it we are are gods from the n+1 scale, we are ‘buffoons’, indistinguishable points from the n-1 scale. And we are organisms, points with parts, To-minds/heads in our normal scale.

The unequal relationship the points of those 3 planes of existence establish, will give birth to very different (a)symmetries…**.**

What is the Universe? A 5D Game of Non-Euclidean Points of view.

The mathematical unit of the complex universe is the Œ-fractal point, better defined as a Non-Euclidean knot of infinite cyclical parallels f energy and information that converge into the Œ-point.

Ot-points are both points of information, with form, fractal points, non-Euclidean points made of 3 bidimensional geometries. And they are Energetic, points with ‘momentum’, with motion, Œ-points pushed by the E-nergy or E-ntropy motions behind them.

Hence the importance of ‘momentum’ in physics, given the fact that we do NOT see a point without motion (though we can extract mathematical properties from it). So by definition we do prefer in physics, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian canonical analysis, which uses momentums rather than ‘pure scalar’ masses (Newtonian formalism), in the description of ‘physics of motion’; which for this reason is also along bidimensional ‘foliated’ analysis (fluids, General Relativity, Hamiltonian version), and the duality of finitesimals (point-particles, undistinguishable Bose statistics) vs. Wholes, 3 ever pervading ‘realities’ of physical systems.

If we add the understanding of the two asymmetric arrows of 5D geometries (information moving upwards, energy downwards) we have the fundamental elements that we shall use to ‘explain’ properly and correct some of the gruesome errors of the physical Universe.

Thus the units of reality are dimensional points. And all Realities are constructed with them.

This is what we are. Points, which grow in size as we come closer to them, and grow even larger as we enter the region of the ego, till reaching the ultimate essence of it.

The zero point, the fractal point, the Non-Euclidean point, the first postulate of existence, the I…

The Universe is a mathematical, i-logic game of Non-Euclidean points of view that web waves of exi-stence, communicating, cyclically forming wholes that decay back into parts in the process of death, cycling in time and space.

And the understanding of the Is and its i-logic and Non-Euclidean mathematical rules of existence is the game we all play and each mind reflects with a language.

Aristotle was perhaps the man who better understood the Universe as a sum of non-Euclidean points of view, and after him Leibniz, who said that ‘we must regard each point as a Universe in itself’ and indeed, in the fractal Universe each atom is a galaxy, an island Universe of a bigger gravitational scale, and this infinity of self-similar games that are played in different scales is what we talk about, which is resumed in the widening i-logic of those i-points of view, which have internal parts, which have breath unlike the simpler non-e points of view.

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5^{th} postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1^{st} postulate. The 5^{th} postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point *of view*: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.

So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points.

This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.

Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of *points of view.*

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

Non-Euclidean Points of view have perception, they have mathematical view, they have Non-Euclidean i-logic paths or structures of causality in its built-in organic systems and as such can be described as living entities.

Ok, let us be less mathematical now (-; i-logic geometry is also the geometry of the ‘i’ point, made of a line and a cycle.

The i, is thus another symbol I used instead of Œ, as it showed clearly the head-point on top of the line of energy, also for 5D scales, as it was the central i-plane of the i-ndividual. And it was the next letter after AE logic geometry, so i talked of i-logic. And it was the symbol of iteration, reproduction, the present function of immortality; and the central vowel.

So i was by far the symbol that represented it all. I did publish a few books under the name of i-man, which was the name i signed on my 20s when i still thought humans would care to understand…

This said for future, if any, human or robot soul seeks on whatever is left of my deposits of knowledge, now that Im trying to pour on the web a meaningful part of 5D science, i scrapped all those meanings and use i only for the action of iteration. Yet it might appear often specially graphs as the scales of the 5th dimension n±1=i±1) and the symbol of information (now o for observer and cyclical form, and To)

I realise this plurality of i-meanings confused a lot people, which do have an A-ristotelian mind so each ‘entity’ is one-dimensional in its meanings.

Still that I of multiple meanings is the max. I-ndividual scale of each complementary system of the Universe.

I, is in the generator equation, E < => I, the 3rd phase of existence of any event, when all energy dies and information perceives in the verge of death of the flow of existence, exi, <=>, shared between the poles.

I is when you squeeze the food energy in your mouth and as it dies, its informative waves becomes united into a set of perception in your mind

I is that simplex moment in which the focus appears in the image and Still it projects its form in the screen.

I and the sum of Is in time and space brings from the point of each non Euclidean being its ultimate experience as being, as perceiving, as gauging, as mapping, as being intelligent, to be in the I state of solid Stillness, knowing, is to be I, then is…

…the function of maximal information, the i=eye, ego, self-center, dominant mind of each non Euclidean point.

I is the ego function, the Still mind of the perceiver who orders with his future actions in which its thought would be imprinted in the Universe.

The mind that creates, I and the vision it creates, the subjective vision of the black hole parasite, of the nervous system of the pure mind calculating how to imprint itself in the Universal game…

The I is the first postulate of the non-Euclidean, illogic geometry of all systems. There are in any science certain point systems of which we do not know more in the verge of our existential space time membrane, but each point with seemingly remote or small seems to have no content is in fact a set, with sub sets and relative infinities, wholes that become smaller than its cellular parts, when we get all the information of those parts.

All beings are points which are a world in themselves, and so the point world is the unite of it all. Externally it might be always reduced to a mere point of a bigger field, in actions of collective experiences, but internally it feels itself so important.

Yes even the ant feels itself important as an ant.

And we might be seen as ants by systems of national power that control us.

Any real system will have ONLY 3 dimensions of space, specular to the dimensions of time-motion, hence 3 space-time dimensions, to become a fractal island-universe and then the 4th dimension will be that of the mind of the whole, which sees it as a ‘o-point’ or finitesimal of the next super organism, world or island-universe in which the being or mind exists.

So there are 3 dimensions of space-time in each plane. A 4th pure dimension of the mind as a whole, or o-point of the next scale, and then the 5th dimension will be that whole+mind already performing cyclical space-time distance/motions on the larger “§upœrganism” (sorry i love to use new words, and this is how i normally write SuperOrganism, whereas § are the spatial scales, ∆±1 around the o-point and since all organisms are made of energy and form, information, œ is a better way to call a super organism. and to make it shorter, pœr instead of per or, for the ‘reader’ to go back and forth and read twice. In any case this is a whole new concept stretched further than the classic one, and that is the ultimate reason I introduce new words.)

**@: SCALAR ∆±4 FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HUMIND CENTER.**

** The scalar planes of the Universe.**

In the graph, the scales of the Universe, its 3 time dimensions of evolution of information and their sciences.

If we use the 0<U>9 scale we are referring to increase size IF we use the o±4 scale we consider the human frame of reference.

In the graph, we have written the two arrows of time, slow energy and fast information as past and future, and the human time speed as our relative present.

Those scales are indeed the origin of the causal order between past, present and future and their life-death cycles in time.

Where those other scales exist? This is perhaps the most fascinating discovery of the 5th dimension. The simpler scale is NOT only figuratively but also really in the past. Because now we construct a being literally by informing, molding the simpler Universes ‘brick by brick’. When a gas cloud moves, it does not move so much as it ‘draws its motions’ in other space-time. Motion is really reproduction of information.

So the wave of atomic forms rebuilds first a string world of open string motions and closed string clocks that builds then boson light that collapses into atomic particles that draw again a molecular orbital.

Thus if you are so simple as light is and only have to inform, and draw a light beam you move very fast, but if you are very complex and you have to draw all your information you go slower. And because the next scale is built upon the previous one, the previous one is in the past. Hence the arrow of information is in the future literally. When your cells, displaced a quanta of time to the past build your ‘whole’, you are sustained by those cells, whose life cycles are back into the past.

In the graph, the scales of the Universe, its 3 time dimensions of evolution of information and their sciences.

If we use the 0<Si>9 scale we are referring to increase size IF we use the 0±4 scale we consider the human frame of reference.

In a Universe of ∞ scales – hence of *Absolute Relativity* – the number ∆ is relative to the limits of the perception of the observer that classifies them. So as humans we perceive between 2 i-limits – the atom and the galaxy, which might be self-similar, as black holes and quarks, their knots of information show self-similar equations in 5D metric (*I.5*) and 4D metric that models a galaxy as a hydrogen atom in the Einstein-Walker space. In any case they form the minimal and maximal scales of Human Sciences, creating our Se-size arrow.

Thus, if we use a decametric scale,* for the physical World *with 2 limits beyond our perception, 0 (gravitational space-time) and 10 (Hyper-Universe),* *we establish an ∆-parameter of space-time planes, ∆Se=∆Tƒ, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy and temporal information, each one studied by an ∆-science that in the 2nd part of this work we analyze with the co-invariant metric and derived Isomorphisms of the 5th Dimension. While in parallel, we can also establish a relative ∆-scale to study Living Systems and the Human World. Thus the main |-energy and 0-clocks of time of each scale for physical and biological worlds will be:

1st Scale: Open strings of energy and closed time strings: Strong Forces & Gravitational space-time.

Bosons: |-Light and O-Photons.

2^{nd} Scale: Fermions: |-Electrons & O-quarks.

Atomic Organisms: Periodic Table.

3rd Scale: Inorganic and Organic Molecules

4th Scale; Life Cells. States of Mater: Energetic Gas, Sp X Tƒ Liquid and Informative Solids.

5th Scale. Life organisms; Energetic Plants; Informative Animals. Organic Metal-Machines

6th Scale: Planets. Human Civilizations; Economic Systems.

7th Scale: |-Stars & O-Black holes.

8th Scale: Galaxies, which might be the beginning of a new Scalar Game.

9th Scale: Universe, which might be a Gas cloud of Atoms of the new Scalar game.

And each of those planes, needless to say have different speeds of time information, which we measure and compare according to their frequencies

Thus the key element of the 5th dimension is the study of its planes of space-time.

For an objective description we can use the natural scale, but for the study of actions and travels through scales we rather use the ∆o self-centred scale in the human being.

**Λ. The metrics of the fifth dimension: travels through planes of existence.**

*In the graph, the compact version of ∆ST (General Systems Theory), studies the whole ∆-scales of reality from 0 to ∞, that is the Universe as a whole. Since as Plato put it: ‘the Universe is a living organism, with a body called the Universe and a mind called God, ‘Logos’, the Laws of all sciences, which ∆ST represent’.*

*In the lower graph we observe those planes in the human being. Unlike the abstract graph above, the human graph is truly a graph of our planes of existence, since all the planes we ‘perceive’ interact with us through our 5 fundamental åctions, motions (gravitation: ∆0±4), information (light:∆±3), energy (molecules, ∆±2), reproduction (∆0±1), and social evolution (∆, i, ∆+1). We indeed exist by interacting with all those planes of reality.*

We call the *interåctions we develop with the planes of the Universe, ‘actions’ and so the study of the ‘åctions’ of the Universe is one essential element of the 5th dimension, as it reveals an enormous number of symmetries and hidden laws regarding motion, information, energy, reproduction and social evolution.*

Another fundamental part of the analysis of the ST=0±4 planes of existence of mankind are the common laws of all those planes, which regardless of its inverse differentiation by speed of temporal clocks and size (Max. Sp = Min Tƒ), still keep many common features derived of the properties of spatial energy and temporal information studied in the previous two posts.

Those properties that remain invariant as we ‘travel’ through the 9 planes of space-time of the 5th dimension growing in size and diminishing in time speed and vice versa, are called ‘isomorphisms’. And so after studying spatial energy, temporal information its metric: Se x Tƒ = Constant, which define each plane of reality, and the way in which energy and information travel through those planes in inverse directions, we study the common isomorphisms of all those planes, which will be the essential laws, morphologies and events of all its species, as they are made of space and time.

Again we see how the properties and laws of existential algebra apply to all systems.

Now the purpose of this section is to study ‘mathematically’, with algebraic equations, the previous equation or metric of space-time, and *deduce from it, the main laws that apply to all sciences.*

In this text, introductory to the sub posts and detailed analysis of each plane and its species, written in a jargon more proper of hard science i shall try to explain the 5th dimension for people with no knowledge of mathematics or logic but curious about the Universe and intelligent enough to understand sound reasoning.

You don’t need to know more than what a normal university student knows on science to grasp this text, it will though change for better and for ever how you see reality, and make you humble, because what the 5th dimension truly teaches us is that we are just a part of the whole, similar to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy, who follow the same laws of them all, as we are indeed made to the image and likeness of every fractal part of 5th dimension…

Since the results of using multiple times to understand the Universe are startling, providing a wealth of solutions NOT only to physical questions such as the unification of masses and charges, the understanding of the 2 arrows of future, entropy and information, the solution of the meaning of dark matter and energy, but questions of biology and philosophy of science that seemed impossible to resolve, such as the cycle of life and death or the purpose of existence.

The easiest way to consider the structure of the 3 x 3 + 0 fractal Universe is considering all motions in time in relation with the ∆±1 scales, in which the being performs its actions. In the graph the being through its 3 topological organs in space and arrows of time, will deliver energy and information in inverse directions absorbing and emitting energy for the head-particle informative and body wave energetic systems.

All what exists is performing a motion in space-time, which can be reduced to a motion through the alternate, ±T∆S entropy and information arrows of any system, whereas the symbol ± implies a motion towards higher energy (+) or higher information (-). And the symbol ∆ implies a growth or diminution in its spatial social dimension, as its 3 topologies of space form larger or smaller networks in its internal and external structure.

Motion through the different social scales of space-time never stops happening.

The universe constantly moves in time, so do all beings in existence, as existence of being, is the being in time, the being moving along its 3 ages of time, transforming its inner topologies of energy and information or evolving or devolving socially outside and inside its universe.

So as the being exits, it moves in discontinuous steps which displace it along one of those ∆ Time≈space symmetries that make ‘time move, change’, reality vary.

We can then talk of 3 x 2 motions along the inverse dimensions of ∆, S, and T. So motions to the past or energy motions, motions to the future or informative motions, motions upwards into wholes or social motions, motions backwards dissolving a whole or dissolution-death motions, and motions along space deceleration, acceleration, steady speed, conform the 6 canonic type of motions first analysed by Aristotle, which talked of generation, reproduction and extinction (the 3 motions of time), locomotions in space (±a), and growth and diminutions, ±∆.

What we call life or existence is thus a series of displacements through those dimensions of ∆st.

Combinations of those motions is causal series form the time space symmetries, which we know as events of existence, and the sum of them all is the most important ∆ timespace symmetry or cycle of existence and its topological/age symmetry, move a certain domain of interrelated, network-connected, organic group, the system resembles more and more to a super organism.

**∆±¡ 5 D METRIC **SCALES

*In the graph, different ‘length of time-clocks in physical systems’ according to 5D metric: *

*Max. $t = min. ð§ , L x ƒ =K*

In the graph, the º∆±st three quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational main scales and main E(st) = $t x ð§ Equations of the physical Universe. And beyond the unobserved dark world. Above, the different behaviour of those systems, depending on which region they are – close to the limits of ð§ and $t of the system (in a lower or upper border of the 5D level) or ‘across’ the system, which is where the metric of the fifth dimension remains constant.

To understand 5 Dimensional physics, and the scales of physical systems, we must first translate the metric of the 5th dimension in terms of physical constants and parameters of space-quanta, temporal frequency and ‘constant conserved present energy’:

$t x ð§ = E ∆±i.

And its generator form of space-time systems:

Γ: $t≤∑∏≥ ð§, to the jargon of physical systems and its larger, simpler supœrganisms.

*-ð§: Smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.*

*-Spe:Bigger wholes deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘body-waves’ of energy, and co-exist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.*

In most systems, the *metric law ∆*±i refers only to 3 planes that co-exist together, where the metric applies directly (biological systems at the cellular, individual and species scale ).

Yet physical systems are the largest of the ‘nested’ Russian dolls of the Universe. So the scales are enormous.

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. $ t), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, ð§ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

The 4 basic scales of mathematical physics, the galactic, ∆+1, gravitational light space-time scale, the thermodynamic, temperature, molecular, matter scale, ∆, the atomic and particle, ∆-1 scale and the dark world beyond galaxies, or cosmological scale, ∆+2, wrongly considered to follow the same laws that the ∆+1 galactic scale described by Einstein’s Relativity principles.

In the graph, we hint at a repetition of those scales, which in physical properties might be infinite as we find an astonishing symmetry between galaxies and atoms, which are unified mathematically with 5D metric (unification equation of forces: masses and charges).

Further on, when we look within those ‘large scales’, the quantum, thermal and gravitational world have sub-scales and forces that emerge into each other (the magnetic domains, which act in the 3 scales, the ¥-rays, whose frequencies carry energy and information across all) that structures the largest ‘whole’ fully understood, the galaxy, as a single supœrganism, over which we can ‘cast’ the different ‘stientific perspective’ of knowledge:

A simplex mathematical description, akin to that of the atom; a more complex biological analysis of its parts and cycles that make the galaxy (and by extension the atom) akin to a cell and finally a metaphysical disquisition about the informative, sentient and reproductive qualities of its centres (quarks and black holes). While we shall escape all together the more metaphysical question about the apperception of atoms and galaxies, the biological properties of both are unavoidable to make a proper description of it. And once we have understood the ‘ego paradox’, that makes humans reject vital properties to non-anthopomorphic beings, ignore the qualms of orthodoxy.

Physical experiments are concerned with those 3 planes of the physical Universe, (the particle and cosmic scales), to which Complexity and its T.Œ (Theory of the Organic Everything), ads its models within the organic paradigm that reveals information about its structure at a higher level than the minimalist description through locomotions and integrals of its worldlines.

*In this post we shall explore those 4 scales, which we define in detail in the 3rd line, plane by plane of the 5th dimension. Their main feature is the symmetry respect to the human mind-center of its two fundamental entities, ∆-1 charges and ∆+1 masses, at the level of atoms and galaxies. Thus we divide roughly the stience of astrophysics in ∆≥+1 astronomy and ∆≤o: physics.*

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser space’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

And this happens, because the universe of scales of space-time has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a body-wave of energy.

So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. *And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:*

Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.

And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

And we resume this with a simple equation, which is in science call the ‘metric equation’ of a dimension of space-time, in this case the 5th dimension of scalar, organic systems, which is the arrow of future of the Universe:

*5D metric*: $t (spatial size) x ð§ (temporal clocks of information= ∆-constant

That is, the product of the speed of information and entropy of the system remains constant, so smaller and larger beings can co-exist together in present.

And we call this ‘constant of present’ Energy.

For example, a fly thinks 10 times faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can co-exist.

And of course it applies to physics, as masses are vortices of time information, which end its world cycle of existence in the explosive dimension of entropy and death in a cyclical, fractal Universe, in which big-bang means merely the E<=>Mc² death side of Einstein equation.

But *this equation runs the other way around creating mass, collapsing entropy into mass. In fact Einstein first wrote it as M=E/c², in a landmark paper, explaining how gravitation could create mass out of entropy, as those strangelets and black holes, do collapsing light mass into heavy mass particles, as galaxies do, collapsing vacuum space into gravitational mass.*

And true physics needs both arrows of time.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information.

**The 5th dimension of absolute future time: wholes come after parts.**

Thus, there is a MUCH MORE IMPORTANT CONCEPT OF TIME, IN 5DIMENSIONAL PHYSICS, related to the meaning of the Universal Constants of ‘Energy and Time’, of the 3 fundamental planes of the 5th dimension and its physical systems, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-Thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 cosmological scale, which will truly explain the equations and meanings of physics.

The lower scales of reality influence the larger ones, but energy and information does not transfer equally upwards (information moves easily but energy finds entropy) that downwards (motion synchronises perfectly but information does not go downwards – no Lamarckian evolution).

This duality is essential to understand how informative spins move upwards synchronising the motion of physical parts and how lineal energy moves downwards establishing the mechanical motions of Newtonian physics. And how parts and wholes become organic parts of physical systems.

Mathematical physics is in that sense only a part of all the properties of physical systems. Bio-logical properties are far more essential to synthesise the meaning of physical systems, the why and reasons of its ‘Maxwellian demons’ (-; all those points-particles, fractal points of view that gauge information, act-react to the environment and pursuit actions in space time that maximise its function of existence œ (±∆ e & i, ∑œ, ∫U).

In pure existential algebra, ¬Æ, we can deduce mathematically, departing from a logic function of existence, Œ, in which 5 different space-time actions delivered by each fractal point, in a given plane of the 5th dimension, traces a series of actions, which are ordered into world cycles, that represent a flow of vital space, enclosed into a series of seemingly permanent perpendicular time cycles that guide them.

Physical Existence is a holography of closed moving bidimensional functions of temporal information, To, surrounding expansive fields of entropy, vital spaces, Sæ, to iterate its formal, cyclical waves in a reproductive, organic game, which can be better expressed in darwinian biological ways. Atoms in that sense behave in no different orm from animal herds and territorial beasts, or human beings for that matter: they have a territory constrained by the boundaries of its field of force, in which an electronic body constantly captures photonic energy, which it transfers to the positive nucleus to ‘fence it off’, and avoid its absorption by the stronger nucleons, feeding them with electromagnetic energy and information.

Atoms and molecules are therefore organic species, which act in modes that can be described with the biological topology of space-time systems, and its actions respond to the ‘Universal mandate’ of all systems – to feed on energy and information, ±∆e, i, and iterate its cycles into an offspring of new particles and atomic systems, ∆œ, that will evolve socially into larger universal planes, ∑œ>∆+1.

So it could be possible to make a merely qualitative, biological why-explanation of atomic physics without any quantitative, mathematical description on the details of those actions of atoms, in which they exchange energy and information, iterate and evolve socially into news atoms, molecules and matter states.

The outcome of those interactions is predictable in mere ‘top predator’ terms, considering the ‘momentum’ product of the active magnitude ‘To-strength-density’ and its Sæ entropic speed-motion, p = Active magnitude x Speed, the top predator force of the system (as we consider the intelligence and body force of a biological beings its 2 parameters of top predator power). So for example, when a lower mass family enters in contact with a stronger mass, in a medium in which both are stable the larger mass eats the smaller one.

What is then a top predator in a given field of physics is the active magnitude of that field, which is able to extract energy and information of it (mass in a gravitational ∆+1 field, heat in the ∆-thermodynamic scale and charge in the ∆-1 scales) with maximal density of mass or charge or temperature; which is in relative motion or rather ‘acceleration’ (as motions are all relative and hence indistinguishable, but acceleration is a ‘plus dimension over steady motion’ which adds force to the active magnitude).

When a black hole collides with a star, given its larger momentum it feeds on it. Generally speaking the confrontation between two physical systems, as when two biological systems collide is defined by the To-maximal mass/informative intelligence of the system. We can in this manner tailored physics into a biological science. We will observe for example, that only those crystal configurations in which the centered mind-mirror point of view of the crystal can perceive information from al the relative spatial dimensions are allowed, or else the system will be ‘blind’ to external information.

So all crystal solids are regular forms. We can taylor particle physics to the world cycles of particles when considering antiparticles to be the death state, when the energy of the system ’emerges’ into a larger scale. So only particles that conjugate with the antiparticle, have a mass Dirac value, as their death emits its energy to the upper gravitational scale. And vice versa, we can consider the E=Mc2, explosion of mass into radiating energy and temperature of the lower time-space scales, as a process of death of matter.

T.Œ is able to explain both, the organic paradigm and behaviour of physical particles and atoms, its vital actions of ±∆e, i, energy and information absorption and emission, ∆œ, reproduction and social evolution into larger universals U, along its mathematical description enlightening mathematical physics with its whys.

Though this is not so easy beyond the simplest level of equations as mathematical physics has departed from reality in many spheres, with wrong definitions of dimensions time cycles and time clocks and the proper understanding of its parameters and Universal constants of space, action and energy-information flows between scales. So we shall just introduce the simplest equations, to elucidate the meaning of some key elements of particle physics, such as mass, charge, fields and the ternary descriptions of them.

We are fast introducing a picture of the enormous number of advances in all sciences, brought about by cyclical time and the understanding of the 5th dimension and its rather simple but powerful metrics to explain all what exists as travels in time through its arrows of cyclical time from birth to extinction and then the ARROW OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION FROM PARTS INTO WHOLES, OF SOCIAL LOVE OF SUPERORGANISMS, OF 5D.

For example, genetics codes time from the lower ∆-1 cellular scale to the upper organic scale, providing its social evolution through the informative arrow of future. But the larger whole does NOT code the lower scale as that is a flow of relative past motion.

However the larger future whole DOES move synchronically the past cells. And the past scale cannot send pure flows of past motion to the future (entropy arrow of thermodynamic). Recently we have found that in fact psychological time also obeys the same arrows.

We move first subconsciously in the past, and then we do think with the relative future brain and control motion. Time IS all and existence is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension from seminal seeds that accelerate in time (palingenetic evolution) and then slow down their clocks as they surface into the ∆+1 scale of time, and then live the slower times of the super organisms of nations and civilisations of history, to die fast back to cells, completing a world cycle…

Those are fast reviews of some classic themes of time in physics, biology, sociology and psychology – mental time, which conform the 4 fields of time-space sciences unified by the new metrics of 5D fractal, cyclical space-time. As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension.

In the graph, we have summarised all those scales and the 2 relative inverse arrows, which make a life-death cycle a ‘loop’ of time in 3 ages moving also upwards and downwards in the 5th dimension, origin of the ‘Generator Equation’ of 5D Fractal space-time, poised to become the most important equation of science in the XXI century, as it resumes its 3 elements, the motions up and down in scales of the 5th dimension, the 3 ages of time, dominated each one by the 3 parts of all organisms, which respond to the 3 only topologies of geometrical systems’ – the young energetic age dominated by lineal toroid fields/limbs of entropy of maximal speed between 2 points, the mature, reproductive age dominated by present hyperbolic body-waves and the future-informative age dominated by spherical particle/heads of maximal informative storage:

Γ. ∆-1: $t (past-lineal, toroid limbs-fields) ≤≥∆: ExI (hyperbolic-planar body-waves) ≤≥ ð§∆+1 (spherical future particles-heads)

Whereas we introduce some basic symbols of 5D Metrics, ∆ for the 5h dimension with an index for its planes, Γ, the G-enerator equation, which can be studied for each system in detail and for each part in new ternary fractal divisions, <, the arrow of expansive entropy, > the arrow of future information and ≈ =, the arrow of present balance, ExI, the energy and information mixture of Sæ: spatial entropy and O-cyclical, temporal clocks with maximal form which body-waves mix in present states.

So the next step of evolution of mathematical physics is to connect this modern description of $t-fields, ∑∏-waves & ð§-particles, with the ternary structure, $t≥∑∏≥ ð§ systems that move over entropic, Sæ fields, reproduce through wave motions and gauge information with its particles, creating a social organism of 3 simultaneous spatial parts, with internal clocks synchronised to the external world.

To that aim we shall repeat the fact that each scale has its own ‘constants of space actions’ and time clocks, which suffer clear changes of structure as formal motions transfer ‘as energy’ through 3 scales.

Thus, there are 3 Constants of space-time in each scale:

∆-1: H-planck constant: Energy = H x ƒ;whereas H is the constant of action and ƒ the measure of §ð frequency, the internal clock of time of quantum systems.

∆: k-Boltzmann Constant: Energy = 2/3k x T, whereas k is the constant of action of thermodynamic systems and T, temperature, the measure of molecular vibrations, the internal clock of molecular systems.

∆+1: c-Light Space Constant: E = cc x M, whereas c² is the constant of action of the Gravitational scale and M, Mass, the cyclical vortex of time, the clock of Gravitational systems.

How energy and time transfer between scales, how a clock of time disappears in one scale, so Standard Model particles do not have mass, and then its frequency clocks transfer time in the form of radiation to the thermodynamic scale, and then Black holes of the gravitational scale don’t have temperature… questions that physicists have not even answered because using lineal time, as Pauli once said of a paper, ‘they are no even wrong’… and will open up an entire new world of relationships and meanings to each and all sciences.

As both arrows can happen between entropic limbs-fields and waves, which move informative heads-particles and each part can be divided in new ternary parts (so for example your informative nervous system divides into a lineal spinal chord that controls the energetic body and limbs, your brain with a hyperbolic grey matter and your smaller eye, the focus of your information, making you an I=Eye (max. Information; ð§t) < Wor(l)d=ExI verbal brain: i think therefore I exist: max. balance, the site of your will and finally the spinal reflex past system of control of your external motions – that obsessive part of a system of timespace physicists study so well, but so simple when you know the whole depth of timespace (-;

Thus on the frontier between those worlds ‘time halts’ to a zero and explodes in the new scale at maximal speed.

From the frequency of radiation we move into the temperature of solid bodies, shrinking by a fourth power the total energy, which emerges as temperature from high frequency-temperatures which slow down as we grow in mass, and finally reach zero temperature in the densest mass fields, black holes, where also time dilation makes time zero. So the clocks of time of each scale have a curous similar behaviour, with a lineal region of similar speed and sudden accelerations of frequency and temperature inverse to the future arrow o f growing size and diminishing time speeds.

Those time zero transitions when a system dies and its energy transfers to a larger top predator membrane, or whole, which must always be considered a top predator of smaller zero points, means that at this stage, the being becomes a sow part of the shoe in which it dies and transfers its energy an information So for example masses die as anti masses, particles and antiparticles conjugate their imaginary and real antiparticle particle system into a mass moment, in the dirac equation. So only particles tha die as antiparticles acquire mass, meaning transfer its mass in the point zero of death its energy to the upper scale of mass membranes.**.**

Those 3 metric equations of the 3 scales of physical systems are co-invariant to relative changes of energy and information, and this is the ultimate meaning of the H, K, C constants of action of the 3 scales. They remain invariant for each quanta of action, as if we increase the energy of the action we have to diminish the time frequency or duration of it, to maintain 5D metrics invariant: H = E x T.

**How to describe formally the parameters of space and time of a system. Speed, density and existence.**

Now the first question to answer is what are the parameters we use to study the vital space and cyclical time of a being. The answer is not immediate, because of the degree of detail, of the qualitative vs. quantitative description of the multiple ∆-scales in which an organism exists, etc. etc.

We thus shall talk of a ‘Function of Existence’ , which would be the function of space and time of a being. Such function of existence can be described in many ways. And as we go deeper into the understanding of the structure of a system, we shall see new ‘properties’ of those vital space and times.

Yet at first sight from a purely physical perspective

*And the equation we search for, is a fractal generator, simple equation that relates space and time, and hence is the origin of all systems – the inverse properties of space and time, which however seek for a balance, in its complementary systems, which bring 2 contradictory tendencies:*

ð§/$t=Constant of density $t x ð§ = Constant of speed

Which are the 2 compound fundamental parameters/magnitudes to measure the Informative and Spatial ‘existential momentum’ of a system, and as such are defined in all of them.

We call those relationships, or any other system of equations that define the vital space and cyclical time of a system, the function of existence of the space-time being.

And it is the departure equation for all systems.

Indeed, what we call density it is related to the informative density of numbers, points of view, quanta, active magnitude, that is, the number of equal U_{∆-1} elements of the system per unit of volume, which measures the force of the system compared to any other entity moving in the ∆ Plane of Space-time.

While speed, measure in terms of quanta of space (wavelengths) and Steps of the System (Limbs/field steps) or frequency, v, measures essentially the speed at which such ð§/$t= ∑∏ displaces itself or its åctions/waves of energy and information across the U∆ plane.

Consider the case of the U±3 light space-time Universe in which we humans mostly exist. Here the constant of speed is the light constant and it is easy to relate its Universal Equation, ð§ x $t with the Maxwell equation of the speed of light. But what is the constant of density of that Universal/Galactic reality? It depends on what kind of ‘Œ’ points co-existing in that Universe we talk of.

If our ‘phase space’ is that of life brains, for example, this constant refers to the density of neurons and its total counting in a living being, and so the active magnitude Œ will be number of neurons.

If our ‘phase space’ is gravitational space, the active magnitude is mass and the constant of density classifies perfectly almost all physical systems from gas to solid and ultra solid boson states of quark stars.

Thus the constant of speed we use here refers to an external motion and the constant of density to the internal space.

What is though the constant of speed of the internal being and the constant of density of the light-space Universe? The second is a key question of cosmology that we shall treat and correct in its specific posts. The first one, again is worth to study in more detail.

Human constant of speed is NOT the speed of light, obviously, but the mean clock of our systems, which happens to be a second, the thought beat, the heart beat and the eye beat. Thus all the key systems of the human being tick to the same clock, which happens to be the clock of the Universe, from the human point of view.

We thus talk of a Uo, that is the human clock of reference, as the center of the inertial frame of references humans use to acquire knowledge with their mind.

From this Uo, however spaces of larger/smaller size and times of faster/slower clocks do exist.

And so we have to define the system at least through U±1 Universal planes, the cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, gravitational/social Planes of existence (biological/physical jargons).

And so the density of the ‘Active Œ’ and its capacity to move and reproduce and interact in its plane of existence, become 2 initial variables, which express mathematically the ‘purpose of existence’, to move, absorb and emit energy and information, and reproduce your form, organizing yourself into bigger ð§∆+1.

*And this is due to the 3 ^{rd} fundamental characteristic of the Universe: to be made of smaller parts that organize themselves into bigger wholes, that is to be part of a scalar reality of multiple space-time fields of different size in its quanta of energy and bits of information.*

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.** **

** ****5D metrics and space-time dualities.**

A ‘metric dimension’ is according to Geometry (Klein), a space-time region where there is co-invariant system that makes possible motions and translations, we can define the 5th dimension of space-time as the dimension of relative sizes in space and relative speed of time-clocks, whose product remains invariant, as paradoxically smaller systems tic faster than larger ones, but its product remains invariant.

This simple law of all time vortices, with different equations according to the dimensions of the time-clock (V x R=k), being the simplest one-sphere=disk equation, for one-dimensional vortices)will turn out to be the most important metric law of the Universe, grossly underrated in physical studies.

Since such invariance creates a stable ‘metric geometry’ that defines a new dimension of space-time, which solves all kind of fundamental questions about reality, from:

– The unification of charges and masses (2 vortices of space-time of two different membranes, the quantum nanoscopic and galactic macroscopic ones, in which paradoxically the faster clocks of charges make its electromagnetic force more attractive), studied in this post.

– To the explanation of Relativity contraction of length and dilation of Time, as both elements do vary, but the product of both, (To x g) x (Lo/g) = T x L = K, remains constant.

– To the explanation of the big-bang Inflation process, as Min. To x Max. Se = K, meaning that as we diminish the time cycle, paradoxically the energy content increases.

– to the explanation of the 3 main ‘clocks of time’ of the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, also expressions of the same metrics: E = H x V(t), the Planck constant of action of the quantum plane, ∆-1, E = K x T(t), the Boltzmann constant of action of the thermodynamic plane, ∆, our plane of human existence regulated by temperature clocks, E= m c^{2} , the constant of action of the larger gravitational plane, ∆+1.

Those are some immediate consequences of 5D metrics in the understanding of the meaning of the different clocks, actions and relative speeds of time and size of the physical Universe along its scales.

But what makes T.Œ so truth is its superiority according to the laws of the scientific method – that is, the simplicity of its foundations, (Ockham’s principle) coupled with its capacity to explain the widest range of phenomena of any Theory of Everything (Organic) – that is, its correspondence will all the theories of all sciences, as the general article on T.Œ that I advice to read first proves.

Now with those very basic elements, we can easily explain physical systems, as all will have 3 parts in space, 3 ages in life and co-exist in 3 scales of reality. And so ALL physical systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, which for physical systems are the quantum, ∆-1, Thermodynamic ∆-scale and gravitational, cosmic scale, ∆+1.

Because of the nature of this blog, we shall concentrate only on 2 of those scales, in two different posts. This post dedicated to the cosmic scale will study its fundamental organism galaxies, with the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension. The post on particles will study the quantum scale, and its fundamental organism, the atom with the same metrics.

We said we depart from a simple equation, Ce= Sæ x To: The constant energy of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension is the product of its spatial entropy and cyclical information. This simple truth however allows for an enormous number of combination of motions and forms, and so we must consider how many motions and forms can exist in each plane of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is made easy when we consider an isolated plane, which will have obviously 1 dimension less than the sum of all planes, hence it will be a 4DimensionalUniverse, and thus connect directly with the different physical sciences that study them, quantum physics in the lower scale, thermodynamics in the idle scale and Relativity in the larger scale.

But then we do have to define the regions in which one scale ‘emerges’ into the next scale and vice versa, one scale ‘dissolves’ into the lower scale. As those regions are special, suffering steep transformation, which are not similar to the ‘steady state’, middle region of the system, where laws are fairly constant. So when we go to the limits of temperature (ultra cold and plasma physics), things do become apparently weird to the observer.

When we go to the limits of quantum physics (Planck scale, larger matter clumps) again the laws of quantum physics become irrelevant, and when we go to the limits of the gravitational scale (c-speed, black holes), we observe also that the laws of ‘Newtonian Gravitation’ become deformed. So roughly speaking we can talk of 2 regions, for each plane of the 5^{th} dimension, as we move from the bottom to the top of its pyramids: a Lorentzian region of steep changes in the Sæ and To, entropy ad information systems of the being that travels through it – remember a dimension is defined by a co-invariant equation.

Now latter we shall consider many of these proper interpretations, and the paradoxes of classic physics regarding the cosmological constant due to their null understanding of the dualities of space-time and how to properly interpret it, but the example suffices in this 2nd line to fully grasp what is a Physical equation of a field: a ternary Spatial description of a symmetry of space-time.

This field though is the field of Gravitation, of which contrary to belief we ONLY know to be fully operative in the Galaxy in the scale in which we have reliable measures NOT in the cosmos, and that will be latter discussed in detail.

Indeed, there might be above it, between galaxies – and I believe that should be the case according to the growing planes of the 5th dimension, a Bigger field, which therefore has faster than c-light space-time and denser rotational vortices of time of < 0 temperature of informative order, made of top quark stars (aka black holes) and Higgs fields of tachyon, scalar distance-speed, cause of the inflaton phase of expansive big-bangs, and the breaking of symmetry (death and reabsorption) of our galactic Universe. And we will return to it, being so important both for theoretical and practical reasons today (as we are exploring those particles that devour our matter and make it matter of the dark energy/matter world outside galaxies, today on earth hence the dangers they might devour us)

Now this is therefore the Generator equation of the ∆+2 cosmological realm of solar systems, both in its space-time integrating present field equation and its past to future, individual equation.

The intelligent reader will then realize that the same description happen for smaller scales of reality, of which we will bring here the 3 more important, the scale of electric currents, the scale of thermodynamic fields and the scale of quantum fields, and merely enunciate its equations:

– In the ∆ electromagnetic plane of existence, the field-wave equations are the Maxwell equations, and the ‘Geodesic equation’ is the Lorentz equation (whereas we consider the electron social group as the fundamental element of study).

Maxwell and Lorentz equations for the wave-field of electromagnetism are equivalent to the equations of Einstein written by Heaviside, called Gravito-magnetic equations with its translation of jargon from gravity to electromagnetism. They ARE the same equations differing basically in the ‘constant’ of curvature of space-time, G and Q, which belong to two planes of size of the Universe, the cosmic and microcosmic planes.

Now the scales are not exactly equal as no fractal is equal in all scales: you are not like your cells, but the astounding parallelism shows that conceptually the Universe IS a fractal of 5D planes. The only difference between those two constants will BE one of strength, due to the fact that according to 5D metrics, paradoxically smaller sales ARE stronger, faster in its time clocks: Sæ x To = L. Below we see also the geodesics of both fields – the motion of particles on it.

The forest thus is clear, the details have been there for a century.

– In the ∆ thermodynamic equations of molecular atoms (where we consider the atom as the fundamental field of study), the Field-wave equation is the Heat equation (Gibbs equation of Free energy: G=H-ST, once more with 3 components) or equation of present, and the Geodesic equation of motion of a particle are Boltzmann equations for ideal gases, of the motion of individual particles, which gave birth to the understanding of the laws of thermodynamics.

– In the ∆-2 scale of quantum physics the Dirac equation becomes the present-wave equation (and the Schrodinger simpler version) which are in essence Hamiltonians of energy, that describe all its elements, and the geodesic equation are the Feynman formalism of motions and diagrams that express how particles move along paths exchanging energy and information with other particles.

And again for any physicist who wants to think on 5D terms, it should be evident that the thermodynamic and quantum scale USE THE SAME MATHEMATICAL FORMALISMS, statistical probabilities, to account for the massive amounts of particles with multiple degrees of freedom, and ‘canonical ensembles’, that study their motions in group, and aleatory paths in which particles stop and go, collide, exchange energy and keep moving and stopping (Brownian paths, Feynman paths), since we are describing basically two scales of motions which are telling us similar stories, a series of particles or molecules which are free to move around and perform actions of storage of energy and information, regulated by simple terms.

** T****HE PHYSICAL PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION.**

The scales of the 5th dimension are more evident in physics that in any other science as we do not limit our inquire as in biology and sociology to an ∆±1 single super organism and its 3 scales (cells, organisms, ecosystems; individuals, nations, human species). So the fact that physicists have not been able to clarify its concepts of time, space, wave, particle, field, energy, information etc. beyond its mathematics of continuous space-time makes the whole field a bit confusing. Anthropomorphism and the incapacity to understand the distortions of observers and observables also provokes problems of interpretation.

Difficulty then arises from the fact that Astrophysics is a ‘mathematical-only’ theory with special emphasis in a single space-time continuum analysis of the cosmos and a human, abstract point of view implicit in Relativity, where the electronic=human eye rod of space-time measure, light is considered NOT only what it is, the rod of measure of the space-time of this galaxy, but of the entire Universe.

Again we shall always find the same problem with ‘humans’, to convert his ‘mind point of view’ into a Universal mind point of view, without being aware of the limits of mind-information embedded in the equation of any monadic mind:

O-point (infinitesimal) x ∞ Universe of time-space moving cycles = Still reduced linguistic mapping

Which the O-point of view confuses with the absolute Universe. Consider this image, the first ‘scientist’ mapping of the Universe. At the time nebulae were considered stars, so the Milky way was all the UNIVERSE. And of course, the sun was in its center:

Now, science is objective and so the proper definition is that of Schopenhauer: ‘man is a mush covering a lost rock in a corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about us’.

Now this is what we so far can see and talk around us:

It is not even worthy to try to point out the sun in the network of ‘galaxies’ of that piece of cosmos, whose 13 billion horizon is as far as light comes to us… 5D physics would say that the ∆4, cosmic scale of 1011 galaxies, form a new ∆-scale (∆5), curiously enough with the same 1011 constant of order between ∆-planes of the 5th dimension. So this is all we know-know. There is an ∆4 scale we perceive which MIGHT BE a relative, cell or atom or quanta of the larger whole (perspective of the ∆n>4 scale).

And depending what it ‘is’, it might have been born in one or other way. In the same image we see that the Universe might be modeled as an organism of network cells, as the galaxy can be modeled ‘best’ as a cell, with DNA-black holes in its center, where stars can be modeled as Neutrons that die in an inverse beta-decay called ‘supernovae’ producing a mass of ‘neutrino’ energy, which curiously takes away the same proportion of matter than neutrinos take from neutron-beta decay.

This is the MOST likely relative fractal symmetry on the 5th dimension, which is NOT identical but as all fractals self-similar. Now in this organic vision we can FIT astrophysics and mathematics, as we can fit mathematics in BIOLOGY, but as we do NOT start explaining the organism of the cell WITH MATHEMATICS only, as we are more interested into an analytic, synthetic view, 5D physics, does NOT START with equations. It puts them, as Biologists do, when it seems fit to do so. Or when we are interested in details or want to quantify data.

This is needed BECAUSE OF the uncertainty of studying a Universe of which we only perceive a 4%, due to the uncertainty of its vast size and distance from our point of view in terms of scales of the 5th dimension so this implies:

1) The difficulty on translating the exact mathematical, spatial equations of astrophysics into meaningful statements UNLESS we use homology between 5D scales we know better and laws and functions of Organic and temporal, causal nature.

2) And so we shall do this despite the natural opposition to an organic interpretation of the Universe by the present practitioners of the abstract, mathematical paradigm.

On the other hand 5D physics surprisingly enough give new insights in both the cosmic big-bang, General Relativity, and by applying the isomorphic laws of all scales of reality, on the likely nature of dark matter and dark energy which can guide future researchers on the field as long as they accept the broader perspective of a Theory of the Organic Everything (TŒ).

Now we cannot make it easier for the ‘dogma’ of mechanist science as T.Œ implies a change of paradigm and so we will continue the method of other posts.

This means the description of the ‘organic, multi-linguistic’ Universe, will be ‘upside down’ with respect to the analytic method of starting from the study of the minuscule mathematical parts of the Universe, its space-quanta, to build up the structures of the universal organism with a mere abstract mathematical description, which ignores completely the relationship of its organic parts in space, the sequential ages of its worldcycles of conception, birth and extinction and its relative ‘isomorphic’ scales of the 5th dimension, in which similar phenomena take place (big bang scales from the atom to the cosmos).

Instead as usual we will describe first the whole, as an interrelated Organism with 10 ‘dimensional parameters’, hence starting by:

– Defining its Fractal Generator, G, with its ternary symmetries in space, time and its fractal scales and ternary sub-systems for each scale.

– Then study the main species of the 3 co-existing planes of astrophysical systems – which in cosmology are its ∆-1 star systems, its ∆-galaxies and the ∆+1 Universe.

– And as it is quite relevant in the case of physical systems that co-exist in an isomorphic, isotropic background consider the Fractal principle, subdividing them into its 3 sub-systems at atomic level.

– Then we study its organic structure in space with its 3 canonical topologies (Sæ-energetic membrane, ExI, cyclical body-wave and To-informative particle-head), which are often similar in the 3 scales, its 3 ages in time.

– And finally focus on the central 0-points of those systems, which are the commanding black holes that control the galaxy and its cyclical space-time actions.

This is the bare bone elements of astrophysical systems, whose qualitative study we can complete with quantitative analysis of the relationships between its 10 components and 5 actions (3 scales, 3 ages, 3 organs, and 0-points’ actions), as well as its variations of species and Universal constants (ratios and social numbers between those 10 elements and 5 actions).

Thus when study those elements, we can get to any degree of detail we want, using the known ‘space-time dualities and paradoxes’, ternary symmetries of time ages and space organs, decametric social scales between ∆±1 planes, and Universal constants of actions.

Further on we can apply the ternary fractal principle, which makes possible to study any part as a whole and divide it into 3 sub-parts, 3 sub-ages, 3 sub-planes.

And spend hundreds of pages analyzing the mathematical physics involved in the analytic description of those elements.

If I were in my prime and T.Œ had at its disposal the team of top astrophysical researchers it deserves, it would be easy to write a 1000 pages masterpiece that would r=evolve the discipline as nothing it has done since the Golden Age of relativity half a century ago. Others are welcome to do it.

Since T.Œ and the 5Dimentional organic space-time structure of reality and its cyclical, fractal laws can fully describe all what exists in the cosmos, discerning also what is likely NOT to be.

But in this introductory post and present condition of health I cannot deliver that much. We thus have to chose some themes of cosmology of interest for bringing solutions and clarifying classic themes of abstract astrophysics with the new perspective of the organic paradigm.

We thus will study the following themes.

__Γ____. The generator:__

We will just enunciate the generator equation and its main sub-equations. And apply the Fractal Ternary Principle including some elements of the atomic, particle scale, clarifying:

The connection of the 3 planes of cosmology (stars, Galaxies and Cosmos) with the 3 planes of physics (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales)

Regarding the 3 Planes of Existence of physics, ∆-1: atoms, ∆-thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 cosmic plane we will study a them in some detail:

– The Unification equation between charges, the micro-vortices of time of the atomic scale and masses, the main time vortex of the 3 cosmological scales. Since it is a long seek solution impossible to obtain in a single plane of space-time, as charges and masses, electromagnetism and gravitation belong to two different scales of the 5th dimension. We will do the simplest mathematical unification and consider the themes of more complex unifications using Einstein’s EFE and Maxwell equations and other mathematical variations.

__The 3 planes of cosmology.__

Regarding the 3 planes of cosmology, the ∆-1: star plane, the ∆-galactic plane and the ∆+1 cosmological plane we will study their ‘deaths’ and creations, that is, the different big-bangs happening on the 3 scales: Novae for ∆-1 stars, quasars for ∆-galaxies and big-bang proper for the ∆+1 cosmos. The theme of analysis here will be to evaluate the data of the cosmic big bang and consider to which of the two largest big bangs of entropy correspond (galactic quasars or local universe).

__The borders between planes.__

We introduce here the borders of information (0 temperature) and space (c-speed) between the galactic plane of light space and the cosmic plane of dark energy and dark matter.

__The 3 ages of time.__

We will briefly consider the 3 ages of time of stars, which follow the canonical laws of T.Œ and the co-invariance of space and time, represented by the H-R diagram, the 3 ages of the cosmos, represented by the 3 main solutions to Einstein’s equations and the 3 ±∆ ages of the galaxy, in more detail.

__The 3 forms of space. __We will focus on the 3 forms of a galaxy, and its symmetry with the 3 families of masses on the atomic scale, to show the symmetries of scales.

We will conclude with some remarks on the infinite scales of astrophysical systems.

The next post will deal with the atom and its lower particle, quantum scales and molecular, thermodynamic scale and there we will consider more general themes of physics, with a more detailed account of the 10 isomorphisms of physical systems. And then we will deal with some themes of geology

My apologies for the bad format of those posts, its bad English and repetitions. This is an effort to make T.Œ available to future researchers, trying to order 20 years of research in the face of some health problems that limit my capacity to work in as the mood and illness changes. My only promise to the world of science is to lay down enough material by the end of 2016 for people truly interested in a Theory of Everything based in the organic, systemic paradigm, to explore all the sciences of mankind, arts and religions with the same isomorphic laws of 5D fractal space-time cycles.

Thus the easily clarified concepts of an organic Universe vs. an abstract reductionist description of it, which confronts classic Astrophysics and 5D T.Œ, is something we won’t avoid.

The reader should also understand that the organic paradigm is closer to Eastern philosophies and cultures as what he calls science is today part of the western tradition, and even if he is not aware of it, many of its ‘dogmas’ and ‘postulates’ have embedded still anthropomorphic, subjective elements of the western culture and its 3 fundamental bias – a lineal conception of time, dating back to the military, worldly profession of physicists and Abrahamic Religions, from where also a subjective view of man as the center of the Universe springs – today substituted by the dogma that we are the only sentient, intelligent, perceptive, vital species (along some animals which are being adopted of lately, as ‘closer to us’). And so he will find himself at odds with the concepts underling T.Œ, a ‘Theory of the Organic Everything’, when we deal with the organic structure of galaxies and its ages of life and the like.

So far so good, including of course the Ego paradox of all finitesimal minds that see its reality from its point of view, one frame of reference more of the infinite ones in existence. And so after that fast analysis of the superorganism of the galaxy we can now tackle many of the abstract, mathematical astrophysical ‘theories’ of astrophysicists, none of them concerned unfortunately with the true synthetic nature of the galaxy and its scales. Now of course if we were in the XXII century, none of what I am going to write about would make any sense of be of any sensible interest to future T.Œ students of the galactic superorganism, but as we are still in the dark ages, we must talk of all those idols of the tribe, Einstein, the big-bang, black holes (frozen top stars), Unification equations, etc.

**Sub-scales.**

There are obviously then as in the ‘limit’ of the ∆+1 scale (c,, v duality) sub-scales of physics according to the ∆§, 10¹º scalar growth, which we will study latter.

**THE ORGANIC GALAXY**

‘We are just a rock in a corner of the Universe, departing from this fact we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer

So how it would be the organic galaxy as a model of the Universe? Let us deal with it.

Now we have the ‘theoretical minimum’ to explain what a galaxy, in which we are host as a lost rock in a mitochondria corner truly is as a system of ternary space-time. And so we can complete even before we show you the ternary structure of maths, the ternary structure of the Universe.

ONE of the first papers of Witten, father of modern string theory, was about strangelets. Since he had been for 20 years ‘soundly’ explaining that the only known-known halo candidate to be 90% of dark heavy matter are quark matter, strangelets, the most stable matter of the Universe. Since the so-called ‘Witten hypothesis’ obeys both, the ‘principle of economicity and simplicity – Ockham’s razor – as strangelets are made of ‘heavy quarks’ we know do exist, and Nature does NOT create a new species of top predator mass, out of the blues. Hence strangelets MUST EXIST, be more common than the weak Ud-mass we are made of and have a REAL use on the Universe.

Further on, today we know that the galaxy is filled with planets, shown to be overwhelmingly the most numerous objects of the perceived galaxy. And since stars reproduce black holes, which are at the center of its galaxies, similar to a cell, with its gravitational dense informative centres of black hole, its energetic planets and stars in between, made of our light ud-quarks, the symmetries of Nature between microcosmos and macrocosmos, *preclude that the 3rd known-known type of quarks, should be the substance of that halo made hence of strangelets that feed on planets (while the super-heavy top quarks should be having similar density, the substance of black holes).*

* *This ternary symmetry, which follows the laws of simplicity and economicity in science, if anything have been further proved by THE LHC, which keeps ELIMINATING all other theoretical only ‘inventions’ of physicists tinkering with equations (so not Supersymmetry, not axions, NOT NOTHING except what we know is there and suffice to construct the ‘simple not malicious’ Universe (Einstein) since ‘simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), and Ockham’s razor work’:

*In the graph, the ternary symmetry between the microscopic and macroscopic scale of matter, which prompted Witten’s Hypothesis, is routinely explored in professional papers, and this scientist has used to model galaxies as an organism of 3 ‘topological parts’ similar to all systems of nature, made of a hard membrane that separates the ‘entity’, in this case the galaxy halo, similar to the protein membrane of a cell, or the electronic cover of an atom; a central, informative singularity, in the galaxy the swarm of black holes, in the cell of DNA genes, in the atom of quarks, and the lighter, ‘food’-energy that feeds both, in the galaxy our light ud-atoms, of stars and planets that seem to reproduce black holes and the Halo of strangelets, in the cell the energetic mitochondria that reproduces both proteins and DNA, and in the atom the ‘interatomic space’ filled with **energetic waves that move back and forth between quarks and electrons. It is the most beautiful symmetry of physics between both scales, proved by Ockham’s razor, economicity, experimental evidence and now unfortunately the Fermi paradox.*

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. And we are its food. It might be that humans are only ‘animals that make machines and weapons till they destroy themselves’? As Einstein put it: ‘it is obvious that our technology has overcome our humanity’.

Close your eyes. Think, do not see, the astounding beauty of the simple, fractal Universe. Feel communion with the whole, as your nothing, but dust of space-time in between the proton-top-quark-star-black hole in the center and the electron-strangelet negative halo.

So turning around the ego-trips of humanity and its physicists and religious people, the more sound objective, experimentally proved theory of reality would be exactly the inverse of the anthropic principle physicists sponsor (a Universe created with the constants that would give birth to man, supreme intelligent being): we are NOT the center of the Universe, dense dark matter is; the galaxy is NOT created for us, but we ARE the food of dark matter, and all galaxies END UP as pure vortex of mass, collapsing into the black hole, surrounded by a forbidding halo of strangelets, which prevent us to escape.

The structure of the galaxy as an anti-matter particle by virtue of the inversion of scales and the experimental facts (the halo has most of its mass, so it is much heavier than the center, and must be regarded as the ‘proton’ pole, while the center with less mass must be regarded as the ‘electron’ part.

Now to be clear enough, the galaxy is not an atom, nor an antiproton but another variety which hints as the inversion of the laws between galaxies in the ∆+1 little understood cosmological scale. By this we mean, the inverted properties of the halo and the galaxy, where the halo is far more massive, defy the natural concept of mass as ‘moving inwards’ towards the center. So the mass concept must be seen as ‘charge’ of the upper scale, defining the electron as ‘more charged’ than the black hole proton and we shall explore those themes in the fourth line.

**The ∆±1 limits of the Universal supœrganism: Unification equation.**

Where are the known-known limits of the Universal supœrganism, where the 5D metric equation works? The answer is *according to the properties of suœrganisms, where we find a self-similar structure, whose constants of spe/tiƒ are equivalent in 5D metric, which turn out to be the galaxy and the atom, and so we can unify them, with 5D metric.*

As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10ˆ30 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10ˆ-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ˆ-11 kgˆ-1 mˆ3 rad. secˆ-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10ˆ16 rad. secˆ -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10ˆ-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10ˆ -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10ˆ39 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Of course, this result is obtained using the underlying concepts of Newton->Poisson (gradient of gravitational potential), refined in Einstein’s ‘simultaneous pictures’ of those vortices, to study its relative curvature, which is the static view of an informative clock of time. So we can observe the similarities of all those concepts: curvature, speed of time, relative fractal scale, vortex attraction & universal constant as a ratio between the ‘curvature=speed in time’ and ‘size-distance’ in space of the system.

What matters to us here is this, the galaxy is organically like a cell, mathematically like an atom, with a positive center, which means a black hole is a top quark star, as top quarks are positive and are the exact size to become ultradense black holes in large numbers, and the electron-like halo is made of strangelets because strangelets are negative, and so they are the electron-like membrane of the halo, and what we are, homunculus?

So we can close as it is customary in any cyclical time-space analysis up and down the scales of 5D left or right in the negative, imaginary and positive numbers, of quanta of entropy, frequencies of information or space-time energies, two simple graphs that explain it all what remains to say of mathematical physics. On the left side you can see alas, the hydrogen electron with its two electromagnetic lobes, as those we saw in the galaxy-atom and the supposed big-bang.

All scales are the same, the fractal Universe is ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE, not only in motions in space (Galileo, Einstein) but in scales of size (Nottale) and topological forms. I just took this self-evident truth for anyone who is NOT an homunculus ego to its final consequences, with the metric equations of the 5th dimension.

**The known scales.**

As it seems infinite in space and time, duration… We wonder. It is infinite in 5D scales?

When we consider the ‘nested’ levels of the Universe, we are always limited according to epistemology by the limits of our perception from the ∆o, human point of view. If we use an objective, past to future, infinitesimal to infinity arrow of time to classy those scales no longer from a human p.o.v. we do come to the surprising result that the scale of the Atom and the scale of the Galaxy have the same equation in the metrics of the 5th dimension.

Thus the limits of our perception of reality are not only those two equal distances in absolute terms from ∆o (atom and galaxy) but are perceiving those 2 limiting scales as isomorphic. So this is the Universe we know: one with two isomorphic limits that conform the ‘atom-galaxy’.

**The immortal, Organic Universe. Upgrading astrophysics.**

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact* published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.*

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

**We** live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, *as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.*

*Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.*

And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero.

**The question of fractal self-similar scales.**

An even deeper view of the big-bang *is *the analysis, given the fact that the Universe is a fractal of infinite scales, of which one is the scale in which our observations of a background radiation, possible remnant of a cosmic explosion take place – a question by no means settled, but considered so given the ‘hidden behaviour of humans of ANY discipline, science, art or religion, where the Einstein paradox – its infinite arrogance, soon explained in scientific terms with the definition of the equation of the mind – also plays its role, with the scientist (in an even more difficult case as scientists claim always to be reasonable, experimentally sound and yet KEEP committing the same ‘cosmic censorship’ of data and faulty reason, whenever it collides with their ‘job’).

In the graph we show the 2 essential problems of modern astrophysics – first its lack of a complex understanding of the scales of the Universe, *all of which show similar ‘big-bangs’ of entropic matter, from left to right, the BG radiation, the galaxy, a nova big-bang of a star an a Hydrogen atom born of the beta decay big bang of a neutron. It is this awesome topological isomorphism of the three arrows of timespace what truly gives unity to all the beings of all the scales of the Universe. *

*A second* more puzzling problem of the modern digital age, in which causality and epistemology is loosing ground, is the increasing denial of experimental evidence, substituted by mathematical, computer models, which seem real, *whenever experimental facts defy dogmas of past-models, with a short of censorship, all too evident in the case of the cosmic big-bang, which has been falsified, but still is dogma, given the prestige it concedes to astrophysicists.*

Indeed, the cosmic big-bang dogma maintains the pretension of physicists of being the ‘high popes’ of science (instead of philosophy of science or religion) and so with the concept of an entropy only universe, which justifies the military culture that originated it, is *unassailable to reason*.

Yet, the background radiation that supposedly proves the Universal big-bang IS a local measure. So it only applies only to the galaxy, likely originated in a quasar big-bang in the last cycle of life and death of its central barred black hole. The issue in fact resolved a few years ago when we found the final proof of the local nature of the BG radiation: in the centre, we see a recent picture of our galaxy with two electromagnetic bubbles above an below the saggitarius black hole, which are exactly the same observed in the BG radiation that astrophysicists thought to be originated 13 billion years light away, at the birth of the cosmos (: So they were using them trying to measure if its light after 13 billion years travelling from the cosmic big-bang suffered delays depending on frequency. Well it turnED out they are just above and below Saggitarius 🙂

IT IS THEN obvious that the Universe is an immortal fractal of galaxies imploding vacuum space into gravitational informative vortices of mass, and exploding mass into dark entropy, likely emitted at superluminal speeds through the axis of its central black holes and during its final entropic death as quasars

But and this is what matters to us to understand ourselves and the future, man does NOT exist in the dark entropic or gaseous states of matter, but in the liquid and solid states of the galaxy and the surface of the earth, which are dedicated to reproduce NOT to extinguish information.

So we affirm that the local Universe is a fractal of three arrows of time, simple, relative past lineal, expansive, disordered entropic motions, its inverse, arrow of complex, cyclical, informative clock-like cycles, and its dominant, present, repetitive energetic combinations.

And its purpose is not death but life, the constant, fractal reproduction of systems, which communicate information with different languages with the purpose of building more complex social organisms.

And this is crystal clear in the universe at large, which appears as a clear network of organic galaxies evolved since a hypothesized fast big-bang death of a previous network universe in a quantum of time during eons of life evolution into complex social super organisms, from forces into virtual particles, atoms, molecules , states of matter, cells, organisms, planetary super organisms, and networks of stars ruled by the gravitational information of its DNA-like informative black holes that catalyze its evolution and reproduction.

So we can model all those scales of matter that matter to us, as a series of nested Russian dolls, each a super organism made of smaller super organisms, whose purpose is always to reproduce its information faster than any rival species, to survive in the struggle for existence, as Darwin explained us.

It is then when the second fundamental law of balance besides the balance of the three arrows of time-space comes into play, since, as we have already explained, smaller parts run paradoxically faster time clocks than larger beings which have more entropy, so both can work together in symbiosis to create the scales of size in space and different speed of time clocks of the Universe.

And yet, *not even the astounding experimental evidence of multiple scales in nature, validated further by relativity with its infinite time clocks has changed the paradigm of a mechanical clock and a human anthropomorphic scale of single space-time; as none of the multiple* proofs against the entropic big-bang coming from the last decades, treated in our articles on astrophysics, which should have definitely settled the issue has changed, the CULTURAL DOGMAS of astrophysics, hauling from the mechanist, pious founding fathers of this science with their religious, Newtonian beliefs in absolute time-space and the worldly military profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons.

**The metric equation of the fifth dimension. Spe operandi Tiƒ = Constant.**

Indeed to make things more fun and complex, reality has added one more structural feature to reality, its scalar, fractal structure in smaller parts, we shall call ‘fractal points’ that organize through networks into larger forms we shall call wholes. So there is a fourth form of change: the social evolution of groups of fractal points into larger sizes and its dissolution or ‘death’ back to its smaller parts: ∆º±1

And that is all what is needed to explain the fractal, organic Universe of ∞ ðime§pace beings in perpetual, repetitive cyclical change.

The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory ), which considers a ‘scalar ðime§pace’ Universe in which each science studies a different scale of size in §pace, and speed of ðime of the Universe, which form together a new, 5th dimension of ðime§pace, whose metric equation, S x T = C, defines two inverse arrows of ‘ðime’, entropy and information:

In graph, the 3 main scales of the 5th dimension, with its changing speeds of ðime clocks (to) and §pace (Se), which remain co-invariant: S x T = k.

Since according to Klein’s definition, “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a ðime§pace, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”

And so for a 5th scalar dimension to exist, it is required to find a co-invariant equation of §pace and ðime parameters that do not vary as we ‘move’ through it. It is then easy to prove the existence of a 5th ðime§pace dimension with a simple ‘metric equation’: S x T = C, where S is the Spatial size (Spe) of the system related to its entropy content; T is the speed of the cyclical clocks of ðime of that scale of size, which carry the information of the system in the form and frequency of those cycles. And C is the constant, which balances any ðime§pace system, making possible its existence.

The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, *all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. *

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Such systems have an organic symbiotic, feed-back nature, as smaller cellular/atomic/memetic parts store more information in its faster ðime clocks, so they code and reproduce the larger whole (particles reproduce other particles and form atoms, with quantum information; genes reproduce cells and super organisms, and individual humans reproduce memes that create social super organisms).

On the other hand the whole synchronises with its larger size-motions the whole parts, moving them together. Since there is no loss of information reproducing information from the lower to the upper scale, and no loss of entropy moving wholes synchronically. So the differences between both arrows make cells and wholes, atoms and matter, individuals and societies co-exist and synchronise and work together in an organic NOT a mechanical manner.

**Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.**

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:

- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms,

molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form. - A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a *fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.*

In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…

*In the graph, the fractal, organic networks that structure all the space-time beings of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.*

The Universe is a fractal of spatial entropy or ‘Motion’ and temporal information or ‘Form’, if we were to use the more profound terms of philosophy of science. How a fractal NOT of digital numbers but of 2 different concepts, ‘motion’ (energy, translation in space, entropy, displacement, lineal distances, etc. will be found to be self-similar terms) and dimensional ‘form’, (time cycles, clocks, information, logic form, spherical form will be synonymous) structures its repetitive actions that allow the fractal to grow and scale up and down its forms? This is the question we shall study in depth in those posts –* the self-reproductive properties of fractal organisms.*

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein.

Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.

In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of self-similar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of space-time. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.

**∆±I PHYSICAL SCALES**

Now we have so far introduced all those beings that populate the scales of 5D³ reality with ‘weird’ organic properties proper of the expansion of GST laws to all of them.

This of course is not what the restricted, reductionist, abstract, mathematical/geometric only analysis of our popes of philosophy of science, classic physicists do with them.

And since Popes and brahmins hold the imagination of people with their dogmas, I doubt any is still here, but for the intelligent and brave that have gone so far, here comes a view of the physical analysis of those scales passed through the enhancing ‘perspective’ of ∆st scales.

So we shall now consider a slightly more ‘classic’ approach to those scales from the perspective of modern physics, which surprisingly enough fit them all nicely even if it ignores its organic properties, natural to the fact those scale co-exist organically and have three arrows of time, which order their existence as ‘life-death world cycle’ of creation of extinction considered in the next paragraph. Let us see them in the next graph:

*In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human ∆• pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)*

How many physical scales there are in the Universe? The answer in ∆ST is likely ∞. Though this kind of metaphysical questions can only be considered in pure metaphysical grounds. So beyond the considerations of metaphysics and the limits of description of non¬Æ logic systems with human languages, non-E maths of fractal points and non-A-ristotelian logic of 3 time arrows, we are left to consider the scales of which we are experimentally aware, even the limiting scale (dark, ‘string’ world) which we do not perceive, but can hint at and describe logically and mathematically by plugging into 5D³ what scientists have observed and constructed in a normal continuum.

As it happens this dark world scale, outside galaxies and inside the particles of atoms is today overwhelmingly described by string theory, which has a ±side to it: as it is not observable it has only been developed through exploration of mathematically consistent scenarios, which are able to ’emerge’ in our world with certain coherence. But precisely because of that freedom of thought given by the lack of experimental evidence, we have been able to develop freely the string theory unshackled of erroneous concepts of classic physics regarding dimensions, time and space, and it turned out that the result is perfectly coherent with 5D³ giving us systems with Space-open strings, and time-closed strings, with 10 dimensions, in which the fundamental symmetries are those between S-open and t-closed string and between ∆±i scales, the so called T-duality (we shall from here on call it ∆±i-duality, as ∆±i is its proper name, since it precisely refers to the fundamental fractal, scalar symmetry of ∆st: the infinitely small -i, is symmetric to the infinite large, +i). For all this we consider string theory truth, but obviously on need as all other models of streamlining and small correction and ‘choices’ departing from the laws of the scalar, fractal $paceðime Universe.

It is then when we can easily assess…

**The ∆i=±≤4 scales of physics and its errors of human interpretation.**

Now once we know the basics of ∆st the ‘naming of those scales’ are of less importance, as we shall use quantitative results of classic physics and order them as physicists do by logarithmic decametric scales, whose origin we explain in our general article of 5D³ theory. It is though fundamental to understand its ∆±i duality (T-duality in the jargon of string theory), *as it is the key ∆-duality of the Universe, and so it is the best way to name those interrelated scales as a game of russian dolls, which connect the largest and the minimal parts for all the reasons studied in the general model.*

*So those scales are when we take them loosely self-centred in the ‘humind membrain’:*

-∆±4: Dark world or String World, shown in the graph above and below the known-known galactic world subdivided by the ∆±i duality, in:

∆+i=4, above the galaxy, which becomes a fractal point of this larger scale of ‘hyper strings’ (in the most extended models of mathematical physics) and…

∆-4, which becomes the better explored world of strings, which are conforming ‘magically’ (: to almost all the laws of ∆st, which as usually will be used conceptually more than mathematically (we do NOT stop to repeat, mathematical physics done by ‘robot-like scientists’ of the mathematical method, which ignore however the concepts and meanings behind many mathematical parameters, are right.

So we hardly get into them, taking into account that most people don’t understand them anyway – what we want to do IS to use ∆st for what is worth:

- To streamline and make sense of all that ‘magic’ hidden in the ‘experimental equations’ of mathematical physics, which as mathematics is an experimental language, do apply also here.
- To select among the ‘inflationary theories of mathematics’ which as all ‘free languages of information’, not constrained by the efficient choices of the Universe and the limiting parameters of its limited motions and ternary logic, those theories which are right.
- To interpret then the experimental evidence that acts as a final check on 1 and 2. Strings thus must be related to the scanty evidence we have of that world, and this means they must be connected with elements that we hint at but are invisible to us – hence should be part of the lower dark world below light, and this is the case of neutrino physics, which happen to have a ‘weak angle’ on the string scale, which can be and seem to be by clean ‘first data’, able to move faster than c-speed, hence belonging to the ∆-4 world, (of larger space, lesser information hence v:>s/<t >c).

**∆st proofs of string, tachyon, 10D, T-duality and neutrino-light theories.**

The funny thing about string and neutrino and gravitational theories when plugged into ∆st is that all what physicists stuck in a single light space-time scale (∆-3) consider weird and wrong about their theories. Such as in a non-exxhaustive list:

-Neutrinos faster than light, neutrino theory of light, tachyon strings, gravitons, ∆±i ‘t-duality’, which makes the infinitely small a mirror-mind of the infinitely large, 10 dimensional strings (properly considered as the 10 dimensions of ∆•st systems), strings as invisible gravitons, non-vibrational, ‘pure lineal’ strings as the infinite ∆-4 tachyon sea over which our world rests, etc. All those features of the dark world ARE MANDATORY FEATURES when we apply the simpler, isomorphic laws and 5D metric proper of all scales of ∆ST to the ∆±4 dark world.

So in fact all what makes them doubt of string and neutrino theory to the point of getting them very nervous whenever they find faster than c speed measures in neutrinos and quasar, IS what PROVES those theories rights and makes so beautiful string theory, once we selected the proper forms (10-dimensional string theories) and adapt them to ∆st mathematically by correcting its main error (redeveloping them not as a newtonian space-time theory but as a relational space-time theory: closed loops ARE time clocks and open strings ARE space quanta).

We shall call ∆-4, as Physicists do the Planck scale, and call its fundamental supœrganism, a **PLANCKTON** in order to unify and streamline the infinite kaleidoscopic mirrors of inflationary mathematics used to describe them, neither a ‘string’, nor a ‘neutrino’, or a form of ‘dark matter’ (begin dark matter just quark matter likely strangelets in the halo – the so called Witten hypothesis – and top quark black holes in its centre – which I call Einstein’s hypothesis as he rightly say that in a hylomorphic universe, they must have a cut-off particle substance to be real, which only can be in quantitative terms heavy bct quarks).

So Planckton, as plankton feeds the sea-chain of life being its minimal cellular unit, will be the minimal unit of the physical world and its scales AS A WHOLE fundamental first particle, to which we shall refer all other sub-parts, sub-equations, kaleidoscopic slightly biased mirrors and elements developed by inflationary mathematical physics at that scale.

To notice finally that from the •Mind perspective it remains to be argued if *the string scale, as we observe the electron mind NOT the Universe is merely equivalent to the description of the minimal mind scale, which is observing from the atomic-ego the visual picture of the galaxy; a philosophical question which shall be considered also for all the other dualities – are we seeing reality or all is a dial go between scales of the electronic mind? (:*

String theory then will provide and we shall describe the conceptual truths behind it the ‘background of Planckton’ over which at the next ±10¹° scale we find the ‘galactic light space-time’ world, or quantum scale:

**∆±3,2: the galaxy atom**

Next we enter into our Island Universe, which we can duly observe and compare inside out – the ∆-3 scale of atoms and the ∆+3 scale of galaxies. And the interesting ∆±i ‘T-duality’ (string jargon) here, is that as we are inside the galaxy, we *can observe the inside of the atom, which we cannot really see, by comparing its self-similarity in the fractal Universe with the inside of the galaxy of which we do have a lot of experimental evidence; and we can compare the outside of the atom, which we can see (electromagnetic entropic space) with the outside of the galaxy (dark entropy space), which we can see, provided with the realisation that scales in the T-dualities are very similar but not necessarily (open question for philosophy of science, or ‘metaphysics’) equal.*

So in this scale we find the strongest experimental evidence ALSO to fill up the gaps of the ∆±4 scale.

*Those scales are the cosmic and gravitational scales studied by astronomy on the large world and by quantum physics on the small world.*

We though can now do further ‘scaling’ and subdivide for more detailed analysis all the elements, parts, sub-parts and 10-decametric sub-§cales of the galaxy-atom as physicists do, in different quantum, electromagnetic, atomic and subatomic analysis.

**∆±2: Sub-parts of the galaxy-atom.**

As a general rule the parts of a whole are obviously a ‘digit less’ in ∆-scales, comprehending a myriad of little elements, but grossly divided as usual in a t±s:-membrane/singularity system and a t x s : vital space, enclosed between them.

For this scale they will be the black hole/nucleon world, and the electron/strangelet outer halo, and in between the star/electromagnetic light space we live in.

*The top quark black hole*

So this new ‘T-duality’, should exist between the inner atom nuclei and the black hole nuclei of galaxies, which we have partially UNIFIED quantitatively with the Unification equation of scales, that shows the black hole galaxy is indeed equivalent in its Schwartzchild radius to the radius of the proton and hence the black hole nuclei of the galaxy should be positive, hence should be a top quark star, as only top quarks are ++ and heavy enough to be the hylomorphic cut-off substance on them. This IS the Einstein’s hypothesis of the nature of black hole as top quark frozen stars, which he said was the only way he would believe in black holes – but as top quarks were not found in his life-time he always remained skeptic of them. Of course, the Einstein’s hypothesis render false and a mere mathematical inflationary theory with zero experimental proof and zero theoretical value, the so-called Hawking’s theory of evaporation of black holes.

To make black holes we just need to make a lot of top quarks, product of the Higgs decay in particle physics or the evolution of mass into its III ‘old age of maximal density of information’, which can be achieved in accelerators that therefore will make them when enough energy is compressed to evolve lighter quarks at CERN. And they will NOT evaporate, but grow exponentially as all seeds do till eating us the planet, what can i say?

In any case for the same reasons the T-dualities in those sub-parts will be between negative strangelet halos of galaxies (Witten’s hypothesis proposed by one of the string theorists) and electrons, also negative in atoms. And then between the light space-time in between and its particle states as photons, and the galactic stars ad its electromagnetic radiation at galactic scale or..

*∆±i≈T-duality photon≈star.*

The field of ∆±2 scaling thus is necessarily huge, but for the sake of simplicity and comprehension of the larger ∆st picture and its isomorphic laws, we just consider in more detail as the key secondary scale, according to the general rule that considers the main task of ∆st to understand the role of man in the Universe, NOT the inner region of atoms (strong forces, quarks, dark world) which is despite the huge sums spent in risky experiments (CERN’s LHC) to explore it, the much more important, less uncertain, better understood and closely related to the electronic mind of humans and machines, world of light at the ∆-i scale and stars at the ∆+1 side.

Again the understanding of those dualities is scanty in present physics – curiously enough denied in black holes, as funny mathematical tools for weirdo theories, which physicists, ‘digital robots’ operating equations of maths they do not fully understand, so much love to do. The most developed are those of string theory and some work has been done on the galaxy-atom, also by Einstein, whose relativity in fact used to simplify calculus models of Hydrogen atoms as Galaxies, from where most results of general relativity at cosmological level were made; and of lately a lot of modelling of stars as photons, specially in the dense region close to the centre of the galaxy has been done, also with excellent results. If we ad the previous Unification equation of charges and masses obtained from this T-duality it seems more than proved.

So ∆-2,3 will be the quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics, which as usual best applies to electronic/light phenomena where it was found (expansions to all other elements of physics and even the human universe, with weirdo wrong egotist Copenhagen interpretations must be partially corrected, or taken to the Tussaud museum of monstrous things 🙂

This scale thus connects also at •level of interpretations with the digital, visual ∆0-humind view, which is the self-centred linguistic frame of reference of visual, Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of a cartesian (graph) in mathematical physics.

As our space-time is 3D perpendicular euclidean light space-time. And so an interesting mental deduction when widening the abstract reductionism of the human ego-centered mind, which uses those cartesian frame of reference, only to study the ‘locomotion’ of physical species far removed from our ∆st nature, is to consider the mental aspects of particles, specially photons and its ∑photon=electron, social grouping in orbitals.

Since if our mind is just a bunch of electrons, which are a bunch of photons, and physical systems obey laws of mathematical, euclidean frames of reference is because quantum physical systems have particle-like points≈singularities that command the systems with sentient, vital properties. And this of course will be a huge field of research – to explain physical events as the product of the vital actions of its atomic and subatomic systems, expressed in the four quantum numbers that describe their energy feeding (principal), information gauging (azimuthal) reproduction (spin couples) and social evolution (magnetic number).

And so this lead us to the final scale of physical systems, the:

**-∆º±1: human, thermodynamic scale.**

This is our scale, because it is the scale of life, of cellular activity, and the scale of our larger, immediate geological world, and as such by far the more important, and the one that should be used as Einstein wanted to model statistical quantum mechanics once the basic correction of describing it with a single time arrow is solved.

So we bring back again the real three time arrows of this scale and its ±1 plasma origin and finale, just in case you haven’t got through the infinite repetitions of your brain,t eh fact that entropy only theories merely took laws that apply ONLY to gaseous entropic state, disregarded the liquid, balanced and solid, informative states of matter, and on top alas, hyperbolically extended those laws to all scales and cosmologies, giving birth to the absurd big-bang theory, and concepts about a dying universe, where disorder and chaos is the best possible and only future state of reality.

According to the rule that close scales are better observed, hence its laws more accurately the task thus IS inverse to that of weirdo quantum physics: to streamline with thermodynamic homologies as quantum pilot-theory does, the philosophy of science of the quantum world today in egotist ‘mood’ into the realism of thermodynamics.

**Magnetic or thermodynamic human scale?**

*the understanding of the human scale, which is the one we have more information about and seems to be not so ‘clean-cut’ and harmonious as the lower quantum and upper gravitational scales with its awesome symmetries between the galaxy-atom and the atomic galaxy… from the Unification equation to the mass-families and its symmetries in celestial bodies, and ternary ages and symmetries.*

*there is an intermediate magnetic scale, of perfect order, completely embedded in the awesome symmetric equations between the quantum and gravitational scale, acting as a bridge between both, with the gravitomagnetic equations, the gravitational fields of cosmic bodies at the lower scale of the galaxy-atom and its symmetric equations and clear emergence from the quantum field, carrying energy and form into the cosmic field.*

*when properly understood in 10 D is unparalleled because it deals with the whole – conceded – but this does not eliminate the importance of biology and history, as we do have a closer better picture of them, and ultimately matter far more for our survival as a species, which only entropic physicists and its mass-destruction weapons and theories can destroy.*

*So physics is the most beautiful discipline but entropic physicists the most dangerous ‘terrorists’, as usual the human side NOT being up to the beauty and ethical standing of the organic Universe.*

**The social scale. ****Everything is love.**

Now what we shall state is vital for you to understand what is the purpose of life and history: because the Universe constantly reproduces information, the goal of the Universe is to create social super organisms, which in verbal terms translated into the arrow of social love for your species. So we can observe an absolute arrow of time, that of social evolution, which creates new wholes from parts, molecules from simpler atoms, cells from simpler molecules, then organisms, super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies, etc. Reality is NOT about death but about life.

The absolute arrow of time of social evolution Is the ‘fifth dimension’ of the scalar Universe that constantly expands its scales of social growth.

In the next graph we show the two ‘false and real pyramids’ of social behaviour, according to ‘capitalist, military idol-ogies’ of dog-eat-dog societies vs, humanist sciences of social evolution’:

So much for absurd ideologies of history that deny the power of social love and the need of mankind to evolve together into a social super organism. They are military, dog-eat-dog false ideologies of DEATH AND ENTROPY, which deny the ultimate laws of the Universe. The absolute arrow of social evolution, of time IS love. ITS relative arrows ARE ternary worldcycles of life and death. They are explained in great detail in the right side, on the section of general systems, the scientific r=evolution of philosophy of sciences and biology taken place in the XXI c:

The Universe is no longer modelled as a machine, a simplex version of a future robotic organism, but as an organism, and so are all sciences (upper right side graph), based in the laws of the ‘scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe, made of ‘planes of space-time’ of different ‘size’ and ‘speed’ in its time clocks.

I.e. You enclose inside as a super organism, the cellular scale made of smaller cells in spatial size, which run faster time clocks; and cells are made of smaller genetic molecules that run faster time clocks, and so on till reaching the scale of particles. Humanity then in the upper scale of religions, nations, civilisations and ultimately mankind as a super organism, developed in time as History, IS the scale above the individual. And we can study with the isomorphic=equal laws of all systems of Nature regardless of scale.

**METAPHYSICS OF TIME – TIME BLOCKS**

All this said to finally state that time is a block of eternalize, with an inner game of Possibilism, as the future branches always into 3 possible avenues of equal probability, for each T.œ: to go through a limb/potential maximal entropy, the path also of death; to reproduce/iterate a cycle, the body wave, preferred path of survival, and to wrinkle and suffer in a vortex of information, attracted by the stillness of pure perception, the path I felt in my youth, till all other paths, became one. Presentism, is the concept of simultaneous time, as space, the one studied by Einstein and Galilean relativity, the ‘shallowest’ of them all.

# **I ****•EGOIST MINDS: ¬Æ POINTS**

The 0-mind dimension of still, pure linguistic information can be seen as a positive form that generates order but also as a still selfish p.o.v. that distorts and limits the freedom of herds of moving cycles of existence.

** LINGUISTIC MINDS:**

‘Cogito ergo sum’ Descartes. ‘E pur se muove, e pur no muove’ Paradox of Galileo

Minds are knots of time cycles, which ‘wondrously’ achieve synchronic passages of those cycles through its knot of perception, Γ•, a singularity • connected to a fractal generator of a supœerganism, Γœ. A mind is thus the brain that knots with its actions a simultaneous region of time cycles called a supœrganism, which travels through the fifth dimension in a world cycle of existience, that is, of exchange of entry, energy and information (exi), in a larger field of space time, st-, defined by a specific st¡ence, of ∆¡=x.

This in simpler jargon means all around you you will find ‘constant knots of time cycles’ that manage in a true equilibrium of existence to float between two planes, ∆±i, as a living, ∆º, Γ•, being, alas, in virtue of something we might call, language, perception, awareness, intelligence, or simply tripping, because that is what minds do, tripping exist¡ential dreams called ‘life cycles’.

**The killing, ego centered monad vs. The communicative, creative mirror.**

Existential logic thus precludes that a mind which is selfishly ignoring the needs of its ternary parts, concentrating only in being a membrain, self-centred in the singularity warps, sucks in, sinks and dies, by excess of information, obsession with the ‘pressures’ of the external world and lack of balance within it.

In the third age though the mind no longer keeps the balance of reproduction and enters in the third vortex age of increasing involution, as it is connected to its time function more than to the space function of existence. In this third age the monad is in the highest state of information, and its ego ∆º world has become a curved black hole, its personality diminished to the understanding of not being anything but a warping, dirty bag of time cycles:

We could call the Mind, M³=Monad-Mirror-Mind, a term first use by Pythagoras, the first scientist, then elaborated by Leibniz, the greatest of his disciples, which now come the full circle around in this blog that upgrades the perennial philosophy of complex stience, adding all the necessary details and corrections of structure to make sense of it all.

In the graph, the amazing insights of Pythagoreans, who draw the mind-singularity as the common unifying principle of all systems, closed by an external cyclical membrane, which stored the vital ‘energetic §pace’ of the being. This ternary structure is thus as Leibniz and Descartes rightly understood the fundamental particle of the Universe.We compare it with its inverse topological vision, as it is precisely the two parts, singularity and membrane which formed the monad of pythagoras, the two parts that in an open ball of energy, present existence do not really exist as part of the open ball (remember mathematics is an experimental science).

But Leibniz, rigorous with his mathematical analysis DID not give his monads communicative properties to simplify their analysis, making them all ‘black holes of perception’, NOT as they are mirrors who self-create and then project the self into the environment, and further on points that become connected with similar points through those flows of communication into building topological networks and supœrganisms. And as a result sooner or latter systems become organic systems across ternary scales, which the monad communicate.

So reproduction, and self-organization is the ultimate cause of the process of existence of supœrganisms.

But why they go through world cycles? Why we die? For the same reason mirror-monads create reality; because of the singularity or mind of maximal information that both will create as a seed of form from ∆-1 the whole being in the beginning of the cycle, but will annihilate it at the end of the cycle, when exhausting its entropic motions and combined energy, by *the mere fact of being its maximal will that of perception, without which the game does not start.*

Thus minds stop entropic motion into form, combining them in the middle as a series of actions of energy, which are in derivative view standing 0 points but in its ultimate infinitesimal view always ‘scar’ a bit too much of information that they devolve back as entropy and so they are the *reason systems evolve, age and finally die after a given number of frequency steps in the path of pure ‘stiff’ form, constantly growing by the influence of the mind’s sink. *

So the development of the three ages of life, max. s≈youth, max. t=3rd informative age, and max. st=present balance of energy and information is ultimately the ‘existential vibration’ of the being in his specific wordcycle ashe ‘scales up and down’, through its ∆±1 panes of existence.

Death becomes then natural to all selfish, *Stiƒ-minds, which transforms entropic §pace into a flow of TEMPORAL information in the stillness of the mind, which converts temporal flows into a *synchronous super organism, made of actions=moments of existence.

This is the ultimate conceptual duality – that between the magic harmonious creation of infinitesimal minds of §pacetime**: ∆•st.**

And the Universe they reflect and will return to in the entropic explosion of death:** ∆ûst **vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.

So it is now time to switch perspective from the objective description of reality as we have done through the external point of view of the three arrows of time and the scales of the fifth dimension, to the inner point of view of languages of the mind that distort the Universe as physicists do, to cater to the subjective ego of those minds, casting them with a formal equation that explains why at the end, people like Bohr, the proponent of the uniqueness of ‘his discipline’, not Bohm (the proponent of the whole unity of it all, and the realist, quantum interpretation of reality), carried the day.

SIMPLY put it, because while the Universe is objective, just, eternal and perfect, all those infinitesimal •-minds embedded on it, are subjective, egocentered, fleeting imperfect parts of the whole, made ‘to its image and likeness’, with some ‘errors’ of design…

So it only rests to see that *languages, both verbal, visual and mathematical derive also form the 5 Dimensions of space-time and then we shall have proved that languages ARE just mirrors NOT the original source of reality.*

Indeed, a mirror always ‘reduces’ reality to less dimensions in the image, so do languages, and so if we can show you that languages are more reduced than space-time, and can be defined as mirrors of space-time, it is obvious that space-time is the source of all realities, INCLUDING languages.

**Languages are mirror of the 3 motions of space-time, entropy, energy and information.**

A more humble realisation comes from the understanding that ‘the languages of God’ are infinite (upanishads) as all singularity minds map the Universe into its infinitesimal still focus, reflecting in the linguistic mirror the infinite cycles of space-time that conform reality. So before the language there was the space and time, that carried the entropy and information of reality mixed in energy actions whose properties the ternary syntax of all languages reflect. So the 3 main languages of man are ternary syntactic mirrors of the 3 components of reality:

Subject (information) < verb (action of space-time) > Object (entropy of subject).

Y (time function)< operandi-action> X (space function)

Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive colour) > red (entropy colour)

Heigth (informative dimension) < width (reproductive dimension) > length (motion-entropy dimension)

And so on…

But humans have had as ego-centered minds a real hard time understanding languages *only as mirrors of space-time; thinking instead that languages – specifically the languages humans better understand wor(l)ds and numbers create reality. So we have first to put at face value that ego-centered humind paradox. *

**0. Human creationist theories**

**The cultural view.**

*2D: Moving lineal white visual minds – 1D: informative, social, mental verbal; 3D: reproductive, emotional body-oriented*

Before we even go further a ‘downer’ on the Nature of humans. Relational space-time, while being essentially the philosophy of Asia, has had always a hard time to be accepted in ‘anthropomorphic’, self-centred, ‘egotist’ western cultures. As said all is generated by the 3±∆ dimensions of reality, so we shall also study in our analysis of man as a dimensional space-time being, the 3 ‘cultures’ of the mind in mankind. Since as the graph shows, western ‘visual, dolicocephalic, lineal people’ tend to have simplified theories of reality based in single lineal time dimension vs. eastern ‘cyclic, verbal, brachicephalic people, which have cyclical concepts of reality, and finally coloured cultures with a psylocephalic brain (new term of the many we shall introduce in the blog to upgrade ‘stiences’) focus on ‘animist, sensorial theories’… Obviously an important category of General Systems Sciences (ab. GST, ∆@s≈t) is the classification of ‘all species’ and variations of reality according to the 3±i dimensions of reality.

So we could state that if the mongoloid, cyclical, verbal, organic culture had dominated the world, relational space-time would be already our philosophy of science. And if we couple it with the animist theories of a living organic Universe we would be far better off in our understanding of all of it. But as we are in the world of ‘entropic, military, lineal, western cultures’, those concepts of lineal time (invented by Galileo in its study of cannonballs) which simplify our understanding of information, dominate by ‘dogma’ our Universe.

**The 3 spatial Postulates and its dimensions; the 2 i-logic postulates and its correspondence with ∆lanes.**

*We can consider in another way those 5 Postulates/Axioms of ¬E as image of the 5 Dimensions and as symmetries of time and space ages/topologies: *

-The first postulate defines the fractal point from an objective outside perspective as a 1-dimensional form (which often is seen as a dot in lineal motion); so it is the first space-time dimension; the second postulate is a 2D-manifold wave; the 3rd is a 3D physiological network, and defines the super organism. But the i-logic of them is given by the 4th postulate of congruence and the 5th of minds.

*-In the duality of @ (mind-being) vs. Non-A (outside ∞ entropic Universe), the being is ordered by the mind (5D) and the outside world of all other forms and scales is the 4D.*

So the fifth postulate give us the internal mind view, as a ð-point with an inner world, and as such represents the point as mind, the fifth dimensions, and the fourth sees the point as a simple one-dimensional ‘dot’ of an immense entropic reality, to which it will be connected in parallel, ordered fashion or in perpendicular darwinian, entropic one.

The fourth postulate thus webs the rules of logic engagement of parts, in a more complex fashion, giving us all the choices and variations of similarity and perpendicularity that defines the parallel social evolution into collective minds or the entropic perpendicular darwinian destruction of systems by rival systems.

It is then in the 3 first postulates, where we find the knots and bolts of the present super organism and its 1,2,3 |-lineal limbs/potentials, Ø-body-wave fields and O-particle/heads.

Those simpler spatial postulates of i-logic ‘vital geometry’ expand both the dimensions of the point, which has always at least 1 dimension (first postulate) (or the 5 five dimensions of the whole ‘capped’ by the mind – 5 postulate); and its present super organisms, defining 2-manifold bidimensional waves of communication (2nd postulate):

The second postulate studies how motion and communication happens through those potentials in motion; and the result is the construction of networks of ‘actions and waves’ – the fourth postulate which describes the whole as a physiological system of 3 fractal networks, the new definition of a plane, which is now unlike in classic geometry defined by ‘3 lines=network waves’, the entropic, ‘digestive/territorial’, reproductive ‘blood/economic’ and informative ‘nervous/political’ systems, if we were to use for a change, the model of social super organisms both at individual human and collective, historic level.

And so *the 5 postulates, the 3 of space, the 2 of logic sequential time are a good introduction to the next ‘great advance of ∆@s≈t, more detached of the classic languages, as it will include them all, the existential algebra of the generator equation.*

**EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA – ITS MAIN FUNCTIONS AND ****THE FRACTAL GENERATOR: ¬Æ LOGIC**

*In the graph, all systems of the Universe are super organisms (ab.œ, supœrganisms), but the further away from our perception, they seem to us, ‘less than organic’ because we do NOT perceive all the information which ‘leaks’ and ‘disappears’ as it does NOT cross fully the discontinuums between scales with its ‘Lorentzian regions’ of change in the speed and size of the system*

*The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Contrary to intuition, Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales (and mostly time), as they ‘reduce’ the information into a synoptic ‘point-singularity’ the tangent that expresses tendencies in the flow of time of the function; while integrals are concerned mostly with the sum of its lower parts in space, as they expand the ‘base’ of analysis but reduce the different(ial) added information of the whole. A fascinating subject being how a ‘simple parameter data – that enclosed in a derivative or a fourier transformation SUFFICES to expand and remodel the whole system. *

*The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of maths, without mathematicians and physicists understand why. *

Analysis is the study of events happening *in transitions between ∆-scales, either as infinitesimal parts come together into ‘integral wholes’ in space (integral functions), or as we extract from a system the information about its higher wholes, synoptically encoded in its inverse derivative functions.*

So integrals work mostly on space, giving us therefore information about lower 5D scales and derivatives mostly on time, giving us information about parameters of the whole (but as both are symmetric, this general rule does not apply.

**Integrals in topology.**

As the Universe is a kaleidoscopic mirror of symmetries between all its elements, this dominant of analysis on ∆-scaling must ad also the use of analysis on a single plane, in fact the most common, whereas the *essential consideration is the ∆§ocial decametric and e-π ternary scaling, with minimal distortion (which happens in the Lorentzian limits between scales). *

**The fourier transform and harmonic functions.**

It is also needed to consider in processes of emergence *in time, that is in the creation of worldcycles of super organisms, sum of its 3±i actions, another key set of equations also applied in the resonance processes of emergence, namely those cyclical trigonometrical functions which better express the ‘cumulative’ process of repetition into a single final continuous whole.*

And all this could be resumed in a simple definition:

The Fourier transform takes a time series or a ‘whole’ function of continuous time, and maps it into a series of discontinuous frequency spectrum. That is, it takes a function from the time domain into the frequency domain; it is a decomposition of a function into sinusoids of different frequencies, which corresponds to the ‘discrete actions=arrows’ performed with different frequencies by the Γœ system.

And vice versa each **fourier transform** used for harmonic analysis has a corresponding inverse transform that can be used for synthesis. So it is a mathematical **tool of ðime** akin to integral/derivative **analysis for ∆§scales** or **Hamiltonian/Lagrangian** functions **for Spatial, Energy,** single, present scales and **frames of reference **and its distortions of the same single Universe** for O-mind ****views; **reason why ‘Hamiltonians≈Lagrangians, frames of reference, fourier, harmonic functions and integral/derivatives are absolutely all-pervading equations in all branches, as they are the key functions for the ∆•st four elements of all realities, an astounding ‘magic’ fact (: which platonic gurus who know nothing about first principles have always wondered about (customary quip:)

Finally an important and necessary concept about ∆§caling are the Lorentz Transforms and the duality between lineal and curved functions, which properly translated *have applications to all scales reason why it has spur given the love of all things 4D and our tribal idols of physics 🙂 an astounding rain of ‘magic’ isomorphic equations between sciences, but it comes to this:*

The key distinction on 5D motions are motions restricted to growth in a single scale (∆§ well-behaved scaling) versus ∆±i ‘distorted emerging and dissolution, which does change the form of the system, as *it represents a discontinuity in which either information accelerates and size shrinks establishing new constants of space-time (downwards) or vice versa, information thins and space grows.*

So those regions were not properly ‘analyzed’ *as *for very long it was for ∫∂, necessary the ‘continuity’ without such distortions of the function studied, and so analysis was restricted to ∆(±1 – 0) intervals and ‘broke’ when jumping two scales as in processes of entropy (death-feeding). But with improved approximation techniques, functionals and operators (which assume a whole scale of ∞ parts as a function of functions in the operator of the larger scale) and renormalisation in double and triple integrals and derivatives by praxis, *without understanding the scalar theory behind it, *this hurdle today…

And it has always amused me that humans can get so far in all disciplines by trial and error, when a ‘little bit of thought on first principles’ could make thinks much easier. It seems though-thought beings are scarce in our species and highly disregarded, as the site’§ight§how (allow me, a bit of cacophony and repetition the trade mark of this blog and the Universe 🙂 As usual I shall also repeat, I welcome comments, and offers of serious help from specialists and Universities, since nothing would make me happier than unloading tons of now-confusing analysis not only of analysis, before I get another health crisis and all goes to waste in the eternal entropic arrow of two derivatives, aka death.

**3 TOPOLOGIC ARROWS OF SPACETIME + 5D TERNARY SCALES: **

The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science.

As such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time. We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5D will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

OF Course we can use also mystical languages to express the nature of 5D and the essence of the Universe, but it won’t then be through mathematical mystique but verbal mystique.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

The mind, its beliefs, distortions, limits of perception DO influence knowledge both at individual and cultural level as we have seen.

AND THIS is the only conclusion about ‘Physicists philosophical worldview’ – the three fundamental concepts of their philosophy of the Universe, the big-bang origin of timespace, the entropy only arrow of time and the limits of scales in quantum physics and its anthropomorphic theory of the observer ‘creating it’ are PLAINLY false, childish errors not worth the quality of its analysis of motions and physical systems.

It is however a ‘canonical falsehood’ of human thought today when religious power has been displaced by mechanical, physical power, as we moved from societies ruled by religious warrior kings who ‘believed’ in the ‘grace of God’ to hold their position, to military societies who ‘believed’ in physicists’ entropic weapons as their tool of power, to accept physicists as the high popes, not philosophers of science.

*Since power imposes truth not reason, and so today entropic, big-bang explosions and quantum observers rule the Universe; regardless of the anthropomorphic non scientific distortions they impose. *

So all what we can tell them is ‘stick to your guns’. Physics was in the XIX c. described as the science of (entropic) motion and that is what you do. It is your speciality but you cannot HYPERBOLICALLY EXPAND its notions to all realities and pretend motions of entropy is the meaning of it all, the Universe was born of an entropic explosion and man is the only being that understands it all sine its mind actually creates (with mathematics) reality.

BUT AS EVERYBODY loves physicists, considers them the popes of science and won’t take seriously a theory which is NOT based in his guns, we shall consider for a change a bit of humorous thought on the biggest quality of physicists, when playing to be philosophers of science, their ‘ego’.

**The worldly profession of entropic weapons distorts physical views. Their ego blinds them.**

As Steane explains we live in a world dominated by entropy, motion, SPEED, which has been the focus of our military, western mechanical civilisation, giving birth to biased theories of reality where only motion as explained by physicists, the makers of those machines and weapons mattered – so even our theory of the Universe is about a big-bang explosion of fast motion. So culture and power do matter in science, often more than reason and epistemology (Kuhn). This, of course, is denied vehemently by the sponsors of entropic only, motion-theories, mostly physicists, which are revered as the high popes of science, once philosophers fade away.

But power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

So, while a century ago undoubtedly physicists with the quantum and relativity r=evolutions were at the head of the evolution of science and the understanding of its ultimate principles, time and causality on one side, space and ‘scale of size on the other’, for the rest of the century their advancement on those principles have been nearly ‘null’, a fact obscured by the enormous strides they have done in their worldly profession – the construction of entropic weapons, and transport machines.

Unfortunately we worship machines so nobody dared for a century to challenge this entropic view, even when an alternative theory of reality based on information developed since II world war, in great part due to our discovery of information machines (we deal with machines, organic systems of metal, evolving into robotic organisms and what means for the evolution of the planet in our posts on eco(nomic)systems).

So we are now paradoxically in the XXI century dominated by informative machines (which physicists do help to construct), while organic, biological sciences of information have also evolved enormously our concepts of time, organisms, Nature’s information, its circadian clocks, and the ways in which smaller scales of reality with more speed processing information, code reality (so chips code economic machines, genes code biological systems and memes societies) but we do NOT have a theory of the Universe which includes as its main feature along motion, form, information.

And this is what this web offers – amazingly enough, it is the only serious formal ‘program of research’, which has completed the goal of Mr. Steane. In other parts of the blog I deal with the personal reasons why I prefer to place this model in the web instead of going through the usual rounds of papers-congresses-peer reviews to get this information out.

In brief, to pass into mainstream it would have to be validated by ‘physicists’, and my experience of a very long life of activism against the nuclear industry and research in physical sciences is that indeed power has corrupted our ‘high popes of science’, and they won’t yield to reason, as *a Universe dominated by information would degrade the importance of their science and enthrone biology, history, and humanity above physics, economics and machines, as the most perfect models of the laws of the Universe. *

It is then more a problem of ego, as we shall show in many analysis of physical laws and theories (notably the big-bang and the copenhagen interpretation, truly ego trips of the human mind, today clearly proved false but standing despite the evidence that quantum realism – Einstein, Broglie, BOHM, pilot waves, EM engines, etc. is real, and a cyclical local big-bang (Hoyle, Penrose, this author) is the only sound explanation of cosmology.

But why to place all this information in a blog called ‘general systems’ instead of ‘philosophy of science’ or ‘theory of information’ (it does also have the easy to remember name ‘unification theory.com’)? The answer is that the purpose of complexity and systems sciences, before it became a money-making science dedicated to manufacture computer systems, algorithms and improve company-mothers of machines as re=productive organisms, (a very specific part of the reality we care for), *was precisely to explain the Universe as an organic system that reproduced information. So for a while, after my disillusion with the moral and intellectual quality of physicists I *did make the rounds of System sciences to explain these models. And yet, as I said the original goal of the discipline was so forgotten that it makes no sense for me at my age, retired and tired, to steer away from computing, corporations and profitable systems, the practical goals of the practitioners of the discipline.

Still the goal that infused the founding fathers of the discipline, Bertalanffy, Wiener, Von Neumann, and other mostly mathematicians and biologists and yes.. physicists (: is the same that motivated my intellectual endeavours and so since philosophers of science are also a bit depressed and I might say conquered by the bullying of physicists, which have convinced them the ‘key to understanding’ reality is the quantum paradoxes I finally decided for this term ‘general systems’, the science today called more often complexity (GST, or general systems theory is the proper name).

But when and where and how this goal of explaining the Universe in organic, informative terms became a science? Back in NYC, the year which Einstein died.

At the death of Einstein there was of course much ‘praise’ of the founder of relativity, mostly because it was considered the father of the atomic bomb; and we were proud of having an arsenal to convert the Earth into an entropic ball of fire one hundred times around. So Time wrote a vignette with a future earth, in a galaxy with ‘continental letters’ written on it ‘Einstein was born here’. Never man has been a humble being, specially the people of the biblical culture that are supposed to be the selected race of the creator, busy busy writing continental letters to honour the supreme genius, akin to Kepler, who said upon discovering the elliptic orbits of mars: ‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years (biblical believer) to find a mind like his (mr. Kepler), who could admire his clock work’.

Einstein also quipped that if his theory was wrong God had to correct the Universe (it is not wrong but incomplete as it deals only with two scales of reality and one clock of time, of the ∞ scales and clocks). So it was just proper that GOD having learned the proper way to construct the Universe from Einstein, and finding in Kepler the first chosen being who understood him, would render homage to the masters – allow me some sense of humour please. I am just as Schopenhauer put it ‘a mush lost in rock in the corner of the Universe’, so I am just happy contemplating in awe the reproductive, informative Universe his mind has created.

Now physicists as we say have a reductionist, simple, mechanical vision of reality which includes a single mechanical clock, and a clocker – God, because they, only they, share with God his insights into time (Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’).

He also said to his wife, a physicist, that he should not be disturbed when thinking on how to correct God, because ‘women only reproduce their belly’. How can you expect then to explain the informative, reproductive Universe to a group of people, which even in his best examples (Einstein, mind the reader is one of my idols, despite this intro :), cannot stand biology, life, organisms. Galileo was indeed a misogynist and his quotes would land him today on jail – or making him POTUS, who knows, times are harsh.

Newton said his biggest pride was to die virgin. Hawking affirmed that he did study physics because his father’s work – a biologist – was too easy, for the less intelligent people (the three come in star trek as the biggest geniuses of mankind). His wife said he divorced because he ‘actually’ thought he was God and could create reality. Indeed, for 30 years he has been trying to create with mathematical equation evaporating black holes, but they steadily keep growing, AND NONE ever has been seen evaporating. So now to ‘create’ his ‘imaginary black holes’ (name given to them initially by fellow physicist Penrose) he is lobbying with CERN to make them on planet earth, so he can get a Saint Nobel Prize of Dynamite – this nice fellow, also a physicist who was called merchant of death as the biggest dealer of weapons in the XIX c.

So you see there is a pattern. Physicists make weapons who kill life, create theories of the Universe which start with an explosion, don’t like much women who reproduce children and love to compare themselves with God, meaning they feel they truly understand the meaning of it all, because they ‘talk mathematics the language of god’ (Galileo), but funny enough do not respect much mathematicians and philosophers of science (Hawking said we are ‘failed physicists’ – I would say they are amateur philosophers 🙂 And yet as they do make our machines, 7.5 billion humans think the same about them and their theories. So yes, I do not expect any time soon, our high popes of science – and the rest of the species who follows them – to yield to reason, peer-review this site and call the Nobel committee (:

**The higher epistemological truths.**

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that *all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.*

Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting *as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.*

*So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:*

**Occkam’s razor: simplicity**NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’**Efficiency,**a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).**Experimental proofs:**‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

**The loneliness of the long distance runner.**

In that regard, ∆§ð stience is a template that will require many scientists to complete it. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist. But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.

Humans have forgotten with the arrival of time-clocks, which have a single digital arrow of motion, and the obsession for measures of speed and motion in a single plane of reality (physicists’ simple models of space-time), most of the eternal wisdom humans developed about those 3 time arrows, the yin-formation and yang-entropy that combines into the qi-energy beings of the Universe, in asian cultures, the past, present and future tense verbs in verbal syntax, the ternary logic of thesis-synthesis and antithesis of Hegelian logic, etc.

They have, and this is even more surprising, forgotten that the existence of multiple scales of size with different speeds in its time clocks, makes the Universe a fractal of temporal information, stored in those cyclical formal clocks and spatial entropy, its inverse arrow that dissolves information; and how those two inverse arrows organise the life-death cycles and structure the organisms of space-time that populate reality.

But perhaps what is worst, of modern philosophy of science is the ‘axiomatic method of self-serving truths’, the ‘dogmas of lineal time’ and ‘mathematical-0nly models of reality’, the straight-jacket of cultural truths born of the military obsession with entropy and weapons that reduce the Universe to those simpler motions and single clocks of time. And make us all look like mechanisms and machines, which ultimately are simple organisms.

We shall call all this philosophy of naive realism and simple truths, ‘reductionism’ because it reduces the 3 arrows of time to one, entropy, the infinite scales of reality to our light space-time and its c-speed rod of measure, and reduces all the ternary syntax and mind-languages that perceive such complex Universe to abstract digital numbers. Only then we can believe we understand it all, and our ‘truths’ are a complete description of reality. When we put in all the components and properties of ‘vital space’ and cyclical time, its scales and ternary arrows, our ‘physicists’ view become so shallow and insufficient that if the reader is humble enough to doubt of its memorised simple truths, and wants to expand his view of reality, he will in this blog reach a much higher degree of enlightenment and comprehension of reality with the expanded ‘new laws’ and organic structures natural to a scalar space and cyclical time analysis of reality.

**How minds and languages measure time. The concept of action.**

We can now return to the ‘quantitative’ analysis of how we measure time-cycles. We say each species has different clocks. And so it follows that each one measures time in a different speed. But what is then the measure of time-cycles? Both the speed of time-thoughts, that is processes of information, and the body-speed in its time-actions.

So to quantitatively measure in detail the timespace cycles of a being, we must consider 2 fundamental elements:

- Synchronicities: that is the different speeds of the clocks of body-waves, fields-limbs and particles-heads, which most times will be synchronized. So for example, de Broglie showed that the wave-particle and field of a quantum system are synchronised. So are your steps, heart beats and mind thoughts.
- And the different actions of the being, which is the ‘substance of its time cycles, and will become the
*unit of time-space measure both subjectively and often objectively when we observe other systems – i.e. in quantum physics the unit is h, which measures ‘actions’ and also ‘angular momentum’ that is essentially the cyclical motion of the quantum physic system.*

Thus we must deal now with the actions of the being, and its relative time beats, as *they are the units that will shape quantitatively, including physics, biology and human the daily existence and program of survival of all beings.*

And the rule in all of them is one of ‘efficiency’ and ‘thirst for life, for existence’. That is, systems will try to minimise the expenditure of time in its actions (law of the least time, which alone allows to define almost all of physics along the Galilean relativity already explained) and so to maximise the number of actions the being experience.

Further on because actions depend on size, the mind informative action will be the faster, related to the smaller bits of reality or ∆-3 scales; while the slower actions will be those on the ∆+1 world. And so the mind commands the being as it is the fastest acting being.

NOW WE CAN CONSIDER the present space-time view, which is that of the actions we perform as singularity minds to keep on living at the minimalist level such as the being moves in stop and go motion and when it moves ‘it spends’ part of its ‘density of information’ in the act of moving and reproducing also spends it (both are similar concepts as we have seen) so by the act of moving the being spends its existential space-time, let us see how.

## VII. ∑ÅCTIONS≈3 ÅRROWS≈∏NETWORKS≈ω

‘Do not confuse motion with action’ *Hemingway*

We have kept for the end of this brief introduction to the fractal organic Universe, the most important perspective, that of the will of the mind to order, organise, reproduce and survive with all its ternary system into the future, through actions, which are the subjective expression of the arrows of time, for each species that will constantly try to absorb energy for its body/wave, move with his limbs/fields and gauge information with its Ti-nƒormative singularity. So we shall find that the ultimate and most important, detailed perspective is that of the mind acting upon reality using its ‘energy and time-information’ to that aim.

And indeed, all of physics can be also reduced to this perspective that deals ‘with actions, Hamiltonians and Lagrangians’, as the ultimate unit of reality in the quantum real is an ‘Action of space-time’, H.

So actions BRING INTO subjective REALITY for each local world self-centred in the mind the *biological meaning of the abstract arrows of time we have studied objectively. We can in that sense affirm that the actions of minds of the Universe added together give us the full meaning of the three arrows of time, for the entire world, galaxy or Universe; and in that sense reality is an astounding web of dynamic actions, which an abstract perspective in a continuous simplified manner can reduce to three ‘physiological arrows’*

Actions also ad on ‘magically to create the world cycle in time of the being, as informative, implosive arrows=actions dominate the system and so ultimately the system increases its information step by step, action by action, ruled by the informative mind that dominates the other two systems. Indeed, if limbs were to dominate we would be all stupid and immortal.

We are coming to the full realisation of the way the Universe constructs its supœrganisms, from monads (formally fractal points, defined by the 1st and 5th ¬Æ postulates) into waves (monads communicating according to similarity, 2nd third ¬Æ postulates) into topological networks (planes with fractal dimensions and ‘dark holes’: 4th ¬Æ postulate), both in the spatial synchronous view, just established departing from fractal points, and in the causal sequential view in a world cycle of time.

So we can study formally reality as the building of topological planes of fractal points of any species, or giving it is living, willing nature, as monads building supœrganisms.

Departing from those fractal points as monads-minds that create selfish actions which are externally perceived as imploding, explosive or repetitive flows converging on those points, which added in parallel form a plane/arrow of space-time (a flow of entropy, energy, information or pure absorption of form).

In this manner finally a network with holes, perceived in simplified manner as a plane topology appears and through the constant repetition of those cyclical flows or actions of time-space, of energy and information, a flow of time in synchronous manner, a life or a superorganism kicks on and will develop a world cycle of existence.

**WHAT Œ DO: ****MINDS AS ACTORS AND 5D TRAVELLERS. ****Tº= ∫∃ x i ∂st**

In a formal model even in philosophy of stience we need a mathematical or logical equation able to define what beings do. This in practice as maths can be reduced to topological functions, which study form in motion, and the fifth dimension to biological, organic equations that study parts and holes, and minds to logical language, means a bio-topo-logical equation, which explains what minds do. It is the fractal generator with the 3 elements of the being, Spe<st>Tiƒ, seen synchronically in space.

Now we have also described it in time, as a series of ages, dominated by one of those elements:

Tiƒ (∆-1): a seed of information born in a lower scale of the fifth dimension< ∆-Spe (an entropic young age after the seed emerges)> ST (a young balanced reproductive being) > Tiƒ (a third age informative species)<< ∆-1: Spe (which dies in an entropic explosion).

Whereas > means an implosive informative evolution and < and explosive entropic expansion. So we are born as seeds of information in a lower scale, which surfaces and goes through three ages to return back.

**The function of existence**

We constantly explain reality from its 3 elements, synchronous space, temporal flows and minds-singularity. So the same equation from the perspective of the mind singularity will be a series of actions the being performs to ‘exist’, and adequately from the perspective of the mind we write the generator as a sum of actions that maximise the energy, entropy and information, motion, mind and body of the system extracting bits and bites of space-time, ∂st, from the world-field that surrounds it:

**Tœxist**: ∑Å= Max. ∫exi∂st

“Tœxist”, is then the logic abbreviation for the fundamental equation in ‘detail’, in ‘time’, of a world cycle, which will be performed by all minds, as they act bit and bite of information and energy, moving fielding

Whereas a Temporal, organic MIND, maximises its survival, its existence, through a series of actions of exchange of energy and information, ( e x i), with its entropic fields/limbs energetic body-waves and informative mind-particles, extracting bites and bits of entropy=motion=space and form=time, ∂st from its outer world to keep ‘growing and multiplying’.

Thus tœxist is to maximise with your limgs/field body-wave and head-particle, Max. ∫exi, your actions of absorption of bits of temporal information and bites of spatial entropy from the open environment, ∂st (and minimise the loose of both).

This is self-evident and expressed mathematically for physical systems (Lagrangians, Hamiltonians, standing points, laws of minimal time, etc.), for biological systems (laws of evolution, survival of species, drives of life) and as a consequence of man being a biological system in social behaviour, which we can extend to company-mothers of machines, which perform those acts for their ‘œffspring of mechanisms’, in the eco(nomic)system.

To exist, in fact can be reduced to a concept, that of a fractal that reproduces information.

So reproduction (exi, e=i), achieved in balance between energy and information, which combine to reproduce a self-similar being becomes the ESSENCE of all the long-term actions of beings.

As the sum of all those actions will be seen in space as the construction and growth of a synchronous supœrganism and in time as a world cycle of existence, in which the mind keeps absorbing entropy into information, growing in form in three ages till becoming a warped form no longer able to absorb more motion, wrinkled, old, and so it will return all the entropy it has warped into his still mind pov, back to reestablish the balance in the moment of death.

This simple equation, To=M∫exi∂st, where Tº IS THE MIND OF TIME, equal to its actions of energy and information exi, of existence, integrated through a world cycle from birth to extinction, ∫exi ∂st, is the function of topo-bio-logical existence that we shall then use to describe reality. And we shall call it Γo, to be is Γº exist. It is also the mandate that all beings in all its languages try to achieve: grow and multiply (hence the Maximal function put before the integral). And indeed we shall see that from that maximal function of existence, we can deduce the behaviour of all beings, even physical beings (it is in physics called the law of ‘least time’: entities constantly act as to maximise its energy and minimise its time expenditure, trying to achieve the maximal number of actions between birth and extinction).

The monad and the program of existence becomes then the absolute principles of unity of the Universe, we are all monads, and if we were suddenly to die and wake up as a cell in the lower scale we would still be trying to maximise our body-head systems by doing the five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term:

**a, e, ï, œ, û**, a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

** a**ccelerations (entropic motion)

**e**nergy feeding (e)

**ï**nformative perception and communication ï

**Œ**:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms

**Û**… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organise into a larger whole û:

i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û, once and again, till this very same process, which starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die:* *

Thus, to express in logic and formal models what minds do with their bodies and heads, we have a simple philosophical, bio-logic, topologic equation, which expresses in a different way the same ternary structure.

Γ = ∑T.œ= Max. ∫exi∂st, the maximisation of that simple ternary expression of the fractal generator

The generator equation of existence is then a topo-bio-logical equation whose elements are those of a world-universe:

WHAT This function means is the logic and mathematical best expression of what all beings minds, Tº OF THE UNIVERSE DO: TO ABSORB entropy<energy and energy<information (feed move, perceive communicate) e x i≈ reproducing its cycles of existence.

The saint grail of the philosopher of science in many senses is always the search for the function of existence. The expression we have used for it here is by far the only one that expresses all languages and codes of the ∞ beings of the Univrse.

The MIND to exist, To, Perceives its body-wave, exi, which is extracting from the outer world, field, ecosystem, bits and bites of time and space, ∂st, and the sum of those actions, ∫exi∂st, is what we call life, the program of existence all systems follow. Finding maximal stationary points of that function is thus to start ‘to uncode’ the existence of a any biological function and topological form of the Universe.

We thus establish a generic equation of ∃xist¡ence, for all stiences of space-time beings of all ∆¡ scales of reality, which in a mathematical form, would read: M∫∃xi∂st: Maximize your existence by combining quanta of space and time, of entropy and information ∂s ∂t, into energy (max. s: lineal motion x min. t) and information (max. t x min. s)

*2, 3, 4. The real function of existence: maximise body-head, wave-particle, mens sana in corpore sanum.*

If we call the body-wave of the system its energy and its head-particle-mind its information, the previous function of existence becomes immediately real, as it merely means *that all systems of Nature try to maximise their energy and information, extracting from its external Space-time world, ‘bits and bites’ of both (∂s, ∂t), while maintaining in balance their body and mind, their particle-head in a complementary state (and their limbs/fields of entropy when they are also attached to the system, which often externalises this component).*

*The law of balance – synchronicity of clocks.
*

We have come to a biological mandate of survival, which all systems obey or else they do NOT exist. Hence all beings are existential beings that try to maximise its generator equation, its three parts, limbs/fields< body-waves>Particle/heads. And this is what we write in an acronym manner as the maximisation of the function of existence: Max. entropy x information = energy, achieved when entropy and information are in balance (as e=i maximise the product of both: 5 x 5 > 6x 4…

So a simple equation defines the behaviour of all systems that try to maximise its motions with limbs/fields, its perception of information with heads/particles, switching modularly between both states, to balance them e->i->e, and as a result they also maximise its ‘body-waves’ of energy, interating them along its world cycle of existence, being the ‘energy of the system’, the integration of all its parts, ∫e x i =st, across space, and its worlcycle across time such as:

*Eω = ∫ M(e x i ) ds dt = 0*

This amazingly simple equation thus resume all the world cycles of energy of all the systems of the universe.

‘To live is to exist, to perform the five actions that ensure your survival and maximise your drives of live FROM birth to extinction:

Max. exi=stº

MAX. entropy (limb motions) x Information (Particle-Head perception ) =ST (MAX. momentum)

Now this IS real. In physical systems is called the conservation of energy and momentum; in biological systems define the actions of top predators and the drives of life; in societies, the way countries maximise their reproductive economy, multiply its people and conquer other cultures…

And its detailed expression means that *all systems of the Universe will maximise 5 sets of ‘step by step, bit by bit, bite by bid actions of entropy, information and energy’:*

∆a≈-∆e: maximal motion (acceleration≈expenditure of energy)

+∆e: maximal feeding (energy taking)

∆ï: max. information (+perception, – communication)

∆œ: Max. organic reproduction into an œffspring of new supœrganisms

∆û: Max. social evolution from individuals into Universals (parts into wholes).

*In the graph, the fundamental actions of space-time of all beings, performed through its world cycle which can be considered the integral of the function of existence, ∑exi ≈st*

** 5 ÅRROWS: ÅCTIONS ON ∆±4 PLANES**

Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘time-action-oriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous time-space cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mind-monad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.

As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.

Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the time-space spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1-dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…

As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…

The understanding of the five fundamental actions of time-space minds is a complex science.

First we must consider the symmetry between those actions across different scales of existence of the fifth dimension, while extracting from the ∆±4 levels of existence the different quanta of ‘energy’ (∆-2), ‘information’ (∆-3), ‘motion’ (∆-4), or *actions at distance, easy to obtain, ‘simplex actions’, vs. the actions of complex organisation, Œ, and Û, capitalised, for that reason, most often, or complex actions which also require ‘bits and bites’ of ∆-1 seminal and ∆º social scales.*

Then in each of those 5D time scales, the mind ‘traveller’ through the interposed regions of its Γ•, will be able to absorb and emit the different forms of entropy, energy and information (exi), which ensures the being’s proper control of its world.

So if we were to summarise the whole generator, into three clear equations, we would use the equation of the ternary dimensions of all systems (S<st>t), the acronym equation of existence, exi=st, and the more detailed ‘quantic expression’ of its actions, which put together become a zero sum: ∫a,e,i,o,u ds dt=Eω=0.

This expression of the generator is useful because it is a dynamic function of variations and can immediately relate to reality, in a mathematical form. Indeed, if we consider that all systems do perform actions of existence (absorption and emission of entropy, energy nd information in its different forms of motion) by knowing the basic operandi that relate those terms,we give a huge lap in advance. Yet given the vastness of phenomena represented by such a simple function: e x i =s±t, (one of its more common mathematical sub-functions), we have a bridge between ∆@S≈T and mathematical science, we shall explore ad nauseam in those texts.

**Fractal time: actions, dimensions and worldcyles***.*

It only rests to consider the minimal unit of time world cycles, which is an action that exchanges, scattering entropy, lineal motion, balanced energy, implossive information and social evolution based in a common language of information with the Universe.

We divide them into:

simplex individual actions, a-motion, e-nergy feeding and i-nformation gauging and

Social complex actions, offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into Universals.

The first $ dimensional action of steady motions, accelerations and decelerations, ï the information action, which is dual (as most), since we might absorb information in perception or emit it in communication, œ, the second dimensional action of organic reproduction, into an offspring of beings, and û, the 5th dimensional action of social evolution of parts into wholes.

I have put the 5 åctions, Å=(æ,œ,ï,ø,û) with symbols that resemble the five vowels. And so as we have 3 scales of growing spatial form we have 3 scales of growing time cycles:

∑∑åctions=∑time dimensions (physiological networks and its functions) = Worldcycle of life and death (time view)

∑∑cellular/atomic/citizens parts = ∑matter states/organisms/nations= super organism (planet, ecosystem, Humanity in space, History in time).

It is essential for a full undertaking of the Universe to realise then that the 3 ‘scales of time’ and ‘space’ are coordinated together, through space-time actions which combine in the 3 scales both space and time and give birth to the 3 ‘levels’ of reality, where the ‘slower rhythms of time’ correspond to the larger organism, connected to the OUTER world, the inner time clocks are those of the physiological constant networks and the fast beats those of the minimal actions as the being start its stop and go, s-t beats. So synchronicity *based in 5D metric of faster clocks of information in smaller systems *is a huge part of the complex theory:

A smaller faster cell reproduces information over energy and it does it every day in tune with the feeding habits of most animals, which reproduce themselves every month in tune with the original fishing high ties for amphibian eggs and/or similar theories will then RELATE the whole Universe in its scales, as a perfect organic game of multiple clocks, which in each specific science will explain the interconnected Universe from Broglie’s Bohm’s pilot-wave theory of a synchronized ternary system of clocks in physical systems, through biological clocks to astronomical galacell synchronicity.

For example, the rhythms of your mind are external to you – THOSE OF THE WORLD YO SEE, then the rhythms of the 3 physiological networks produce synchronous present clocks, as in you rlimb-meter step, second heart body beat, second glimpse, thought (even in physics as in De broglie realisation of the synchronicity between particle, wave clocks).

So the equations of mathematical physics as all other languages relating all beings can be accommodated in the dimensions, motions, actions and ternary structures of 10D. In the next graph we show the minimalist parameters, which are corresponding to the minimalist ‘actions’ for both of the components of the humind, light and electrons; and the the humind, with its 3 present parts and the second time beating and its actions, similar to those of biological beings. Then we show the 3 scales of history, the super organism of mankind in its 800-80 rhythms:

In graph we see the actions, space and time view and cyclical human>civilisation (super organism) life span of 80-800 cycles necessary to describe the supœrganisms of history.

ABOVE, the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colours and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind pov, hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow:

Now the 3 ages of beings happen in all systems, including mental systems, in the case of social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilisations which is art that mimic in long cycles the 3 ages of life with its 3 styles Max. x Min. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in treccento, greek kuroi; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and baroque, 3rd age of a civilisation, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form).

In the graph we see that the sum of actions move steadily a system to spend its motions, converted into information through 3 ages of growing warping, as most actions excluded death increase form, so we move from a young age of maximal entropy>motion into a balanced age of motion>reproduction to a third age of taking care of reproduced offspring>information to die in an entropic explosion that balances us, while leaving behind the immortality of our form NOT our ego IN OUR reproduced offspring that conserves the Universe in a dynamic present (hence the conservation of angular momenta, whereas lineal momenta is part of larger cycle, and energy, the sum of all those actions into a world cycle that closes into itself).

Welcome then to a description of reality as it is through its four components,** @minds** that gauge information about** ðemporal informative** cycles and **$patial, entropic** motions, across the infinite fractal co-existing scales of reality, which form with them organisms of space-time, that live and die through worldcycles of existence, across all the scales of the fifth dimension.

We shall thus first study in the 2nd line the 10 isomorphisms across the 3 scales, and then study each scale and its 3 symmetric equations, defining its 3 elements, Se-field/spaces, ST-constants of action and Tƒ-active magnitudes and its ternary space topologies, 3 evolutionary ages and 5D actions across planes; fully developed on the 3rd line.

As we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, where the I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs.

In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.

**The different hypothesis over the number of scales.**

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the *mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite. *

*On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one. *

In terms of mathematics, ∆nalysis becomes self-evidently the most important branch of mathematical physics. But as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best to parametrize and model the 5D.

The 3 different perspective departing from a certain point of view, in this case man, gives different perceptions of larger and smaller beings as the distortion of their time clocks and size steps vary.

And this gives birth to 3 possible hypothesis:

- That they are both equal in identity terms (not likely). Then the game constantly repeats.
- That they are fractal in its equality, that is, they maintain most isomorphisms but are ‘varieties’ of different the with certain ‘space-time’, exi=st constants changed. Then for higher and lower 10 scales that conform other full game there will be a parallel type of Universe.
- That they are only the 10 scales that there is. That is, that the Universe is NOT infinite in scales but 10-scalar. And this theory gives birth to two possible scenarios. that the Planes of the Universe are identical because we humans perceive them – limits upwards and downwards, then the equation moves to the mind, considered now a system which perceives equally smaller and larger beings – somehow with similar mental senses. Or that they are really, objectively the end-limits and so we talk of a flat Universe with a limit of scales in the 5th dimension, which seems unreal for many reasons – we cannot conceive a universal dimension in finite terms and it is not sound epistemologically.

We shall here only consider the formalism that unifies the atom and the galaxy, and maybe in the future will discuss some of the awesome metric systems above described of possible limits in the 5th dimension to all those Universes.

By the same reason, we do not know the exact nature of the Ot element of a Star, which brings about a general uncertainty of any relative past-present-future, topological structure of the Universe, where the relative future (center) and past (membranes) are rather invisible compared to the central region of ‘present’ larger, evident space-time cycles.

In topology we talk of closed and open balls. The Œ-fractal knots of space-time cycles of the Universe are from an external point of view, often open balls, where the central point and the membrane seem not to exist. But from the internal point of view of the Œ-mind they are closed balls. That is, they do have an ∆-sphere structure.

Now the procedure to study with the isomorphic method those scales is the inverse of the present astrophysical method: we study downwards with the synthetic method the whole first as a super organism with a world cycle, in this case the super organism of the galaxy with its quasar world cycle.

Then we study its inner parts, its cellular parts, and then only finally its outer world, its cosmological realm.

And we study first the organic properties of the system as they are the teleological finality of all systems (to survive by having an efficient ternary structure in space), then we study its 3 ages of life, and then we study its actions and scales in the five dimension. Only with this synthetic knowledge of the system, which does not require more than simple mathematics, as it is an organic biological description of it, is completed.

We enter into the details of the other 5 secondary isomorphisms, filled with mathematical equations that explore first, the ratios and processes and interaction between the parts of the system in space (6th isomorphism of social classes and 7th isomorphism of universal constants), and then we study it in time (8th isomorphism of diversification of species), to finally study it in scales of the 5th dimension (9th isomorphism of social decametric scales and constants).

The o-isomorphism of the mind of the system as it is also an unknown, and the non-Euclidean geometry of the system is studied in the analysis of its fractal generator and growth of scales from points to lines to planes, can be analyzed at any time. I do usually consider it the ‘metaphysical element of each science’ and discuss it either as the alpha (specially in human systems, where we accept both in societies and individuals the existence of an upper informative caste or neuronal mind) or as the omega, in systems such as a galaxy where to know that the Black hole seems in Maldacena equations to represent in 5D a 4D cosmic body, is not relevant at all.

Yet we only perceive the light membrane of informative electrons and electromagnetic forces. So the thesis derived of the unification equation that shows the ‘invisible’ world of quarks with 99.9% of our mass to be self-similar to the cosmological world of black holes and dark Entropy, which means that a galaxy is an atom of the next scale is a metaphysical question, cannot be tested experimentally.

A more extreme theory of ‘Endophysics’ would imply that our perception diminishes with distance and size; and so we perceive so little of those huge and small worlds that they seem totally equal to us, because our mind-world reconstructs self-similar forms with so little information, but they are not. This thesis derives of the fact that what we see is what the mind constructs with bits and bites of information and Entropy, not what there is out there. And so it might be possible that the mind first constructs always simple spheres and lines, without detail and so we see galaxies and atoms as self-similar forms. But this ‘Cartesian concept’ seems too subjective to me.

In any case, we can only know-know the world of man around us. In other words, biology is the queen of sciences, as all systems are invariant, and so we can know better the details of systems of multiple space-times, studying us, the measure of all things.

All this said, the strongest proof that the fractal scales of the Universe are infinite and self-similar (not identical) making possible the concept of infinite repetitions is obviously the fractal Unification equation of charges and masses, U.C _{G,C} × M = w^{2} × r^{3} that relates electromagnetic and gravitational forces at the scale of atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes. Thus if the Universe has infinite fractal space-times, each one will define with its fractal U.C._{G} a different content of spatial speed and informative density. Yet, as the Unification Equation of G and Q, of masses and charges shows, all will be vortices of space and time, sharing flows of lineal Entropy. So the Game of Exi=stence, its time arrows and scalar structures will remain.

In the fractal paradigm, the electromagnetic and gravitational membranes belong to 2 different realities, the microcosms and the macrocosms, between which mankind are sandwiched. Yet the macrocosmic gravitational and microcosmic, fractal membranes are self-similar worlds: if we treat charges as microcosmic masses and compare the structure of cosmological galaxies and microcosmic atoms, we find a striking self-similarity, already noticed by Eddington (theory of the great numbers).

And the metaphysical question is if that self-similarity goes beyond the galaxy and below the atom into a higher and lower scale, in which case a galaxy will be an atom of an infinite higher Universe and/or an atom will be a galaxy of an infinite smaller Cosmos. All in all there are 3 possible hypotheses for the Universe, according to the ternary principle that gives birth always to 3 solutions and forms to any informative system or question:

– Max. Ps: The galaxy is homologous to an atom, so we are truly nothing and the Universe extends to infinity. We exist in a Universe, which is a hydrogen cloud of gas, and most galaxies are simple Bohr atoms with central proton black holes. And beyond there are infinite atoms and upper scales.

– sp=Ti: There are not upper and lower scales beyond the galaxy and the atom. So galaxies are the highest units of an infinite space-time. This is the most boring hypothesis of them all.

– Max.To: Galaxies form complex organizations and are cells of an organic Universe, pegged to other organic Universes. The Webb telescope might illuminate this hypothesis if it finds a wall of radiation at z=100c, which would be an indication of a new hyper-decametric scale of dark matter and Entropy.

String theorists (duality between the small and big) hint also at a possible further hierarchy between the next smaller scale (the string) and the highest possible scale imagined by mankind (a Universe-like a string, made of 100 billion galaxies). A string membrane and a Universal membrane can be treated with self-similar equations in some models of string theory (even if a more accurate treatment requires background independent string theories, in which the error of Newton – an absolute Cartesian space-time – is corrected). The principle though remains invariant in all those models: It is possible to create a reality of infinite hierarchies, in which each scale is self-similar but no equal to the next hyper-scale of the Universe, set by its fundamental stable entities, which are the immortal protons and black holes.

The infinite scale theory is on my view the most probable, because it has more experimental evidence: the fractal, network structure of the galaxies and dark Entropy, shown in the previous picture is quite obvious. Further on, the existence of such fractal, bigger social scales have been shown by the astrophysicist Pietronero in its study of the Sloan grand scale mappings of galaxies^{11}.

*Recap*. The hypothesis of an ∞ hierarchical Universe is reinforced by the fractal Unification equation; by Eddington’s theory of big numbers that relates a proton radius and the radius of the galactic big-bang; by the work of Pietronero mapping the grand scale structure of galaxies and our understanding of a fractal network of dark matter that surrounds them.

Yet before we explain all that, we have to formalize the fundamental discovery we have made – that light is NOT only an energy field in motion but ALSO a form of space; which comes naturally from the fact that:

Knowledge is relative to a fixed, still frame of reference, but that frame of reference is always in motion. It is in fact both things. IT depends on how we see it

Einstein saw space-time fixed, Galileo the sun fixed, Ptolemy the earth fixed, Abrahamic religions saw man fixed as a life point of view.

**It is the Universe infinite and eternal?**

**The** founding father of relational space-time, Leibniz, affirmed that we lived in the most perfect of worlds, where each point was a world in itself, a commentary which brought much derisive laugh during the XVIII c. ending in the cynical best-seller of Messieur Voltaire, ‘Candid’.

It is though the most perfect of worlds because it is immortal in time, infinite in space, absolutely simple in its ultimate program of existence, ∆i->∆æ->∆e->∆œ->∆û, perception-motion-feeding-reproduction-evolution…

And yet the more complex of worlds when its infinite iterations combine into the varieties of species in existence.

But why we know it is infinite and immortal?

The immortality of the Universe is born in the very nature of its ultimate substance: 2 formal motions, where the ‘form’ is the mirage of the senses of a o-mind that gauges by simplifying all the information of the infinite Universe into bidimensional still mappings that can fit in the mind.

So we see forms but all is motion (Galileo’s Paradox: e pur si muove). And since motion is the nature of |-space and O-Time, there is no way to stop the flow of space-time and its infinite actions. Because a line is just part of a very long cycle that closes into itself, the universe is constantly breaking into pieces that come together into wholes to be dissolved in the explosion of On-2 death.

But the proof of its infinity and absolute relativity depends on a question: are the scales of parts that become wholes, which dissolve into death in big bangs of energy, back into ‘planes of space’ (corpses, antiparticles, big bangs: M->E). That is, there is in the limits of our direct perception of reality,On±3, galaxies and atoms, any hint that the scales are so similar and so much embedded in lower and upper On±4 planes which we hardly perceive but make us think there is beyond and below new unending Universal Planes?

If so, if each galaxy is just the beginning of an infinite number of higher scales and each atom just the wholeness of an infinite number of lower planes, if ∆±∞, is the structure of the 5th dimension. If the 5th dimension is both lineal (without apparent limit in its co-invariance: Sæ->∞ / To ->∞ = C), and cyclical (with repetition of form between the limiting scales of atoms and galaxies), the Universe is absolutely relative (any Ot is both an infinite and an infinitesimal) and man has no importance, beyond its perception of everything from its centered o-point of view: Man = ∆o.

** 5D, Absolute Relativity and the meaning of knowledge.**

Now, absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Œ is even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 10 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

**∆<|3|: BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES- SCALES. **

**The ‘fifth’ SCALAR dimension from a discrete perspectives: networks of points. The language of topo-bio-logical space-time beings; the supœrganism.**

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, Se and Ti. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

Let us of those postulates studied in detail in the sub-sections of ‘Space’, the organic meaning of the 4th postulate that defines a topological organic network.

Once the concepts of spatial energy and temporal information are properly defined, and the 5 postulates of Non-E Geometry understood we formalize a superorganism, as a particular case of the Generator equation of quantic energy and temporal information, Sp<=>Tƒ, which defines in this case the 4 fundamental elements of any super-organism:

Cellular units (S)

Networks of energy or organic, energetic space (∆+1 that create energy-body systems).

- Networks of information (Tƒ that creates information-brain systems)
- Networks that reproduce energy and information (<=>, that create organic, reproductive systems).

Reproduction can be external to the being, catalyzed by an enzymatic agent, as when men reproduce machines or DNA reproduce amino acids, or internal (then we talk of a living superorganism) Thus:

∑ E*nergy cycles/networks: Organic body<Flows of energy-information>∏ informative cycles.*

Where an E<=>T cycle is a feedback loop that engages energy and information quanta. So we affirm that:

*‘All natural entities are superorganisms that transform back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping space-time cycles: *∑*Spe<=>Tƒ’.*

Which allows us to unify the properties and structure of all *Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single *template *definition, according to which systems and super-organisms will *differ only in the degree of complexity of its networks and the specific energy or information we put into the template’s brackets and the size or complexity of its networks:

‘*A super-organism, (name a specific super-organism) is a population of (name a particular species), related by information networks (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy). A system is a partial super-organism, composed of a population of (name a particular species), related either by energy or information networks. A living super-organism is a super-organism in which the energy and information networks combine to achieve self-reproduction through a third, reproductive network.’*

Thus we classify all systems of the Universe in 3 scales of growing complexity, systems proper, super-organisms and living super-organisms.

Let us then use the previous template to define the main organic systems of the Universe, from the smallest form known to man, the atom, to the biggest one, the Universal Superorganism:

– *An atomic superorganism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy. *The atom is the simplest super-organism that starts the evolution of complexity in the Universe.

*– A molecular superorganism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Van der Waals forces). *

The biggest of those super-organisms are crystals, the most complex DNAs.

*– A cellular superorganism is a population of molecules, related by networks of water-based energy (cytoplasm, ribosome, cilium) and networks of genetic information (DNA-RNAs.) *Thus a Eukaryotic cell is a super-organism made of smaller cells (organelles) and carbohydrate molecules.

*– A human superorganism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems). *Recently we have discovered that human beings are hybrid super-organisms, as 90% of our cells and most of our genetic material belongs in fact to bacteria.

*– An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey). *And the entire sum of all those ecosystems is Gaia, the living super-organism of the Earth

– *A historic superorganism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.*

So History can be considered as the super-organism of mankind that extends in space over the Earth and in time, from the first man to the last man that will live in this planet.

*– An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc.).*

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic super-organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and includes 2 different species: human beings and machines.

*– A galaxy is a population of electromagnetic stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and light energy.*

-A Universe is a population of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and dark matter.

## **EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things thus are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

**HISTORIC SCALES: ****∆1,2**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

**SOCIAL MODELS. THE FIFTH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ UPANISHADS, on the fact each mind has a language, with the same ternary F(t) operandi G(S) syntax, NOT only mathematics.

‘Love each other as I have loved you’

Jesus* On the arrow of eusocial love , the program of ‘God’ that builds up the 5th dimension.*

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’ *Einstein, on what truly should matter to science – the whys.*

‘The why is the only thing a physicist does not question’ * Feynman (On the reductionism of physicists)*

‘ I know the non-AE thoughts of God; the mind of the Universe, since I am made to its image and likeness’ *ls*

‘Reality is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe’ Plato

**PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS. A new paradigm changes our view of the Universe.**

As you can see, the 5th dimension paradigm has changed completely our philosophy of the Universe and upgraded completely our perception of it. There is no longer a single time, the human clock, and a continuous space, but an infinite number of pieces of time and space. Today some physicists wonder on those paths, such as the remarkable work of Smolin and others with their theory of quantum gravity, in which space is made of infinite quanta and time is made of infinite clocks.

But those theories as always in physics, are restricted to mathematical mappings of a geometry of multiple spaces and times. The work we are describing here goes much further as it intends to apply its discoveries also to biological and social sciences and the causal logic of time, to theory of information and philosophy of perception, creating a veritable unification of most sciences and upgrading our logic and mathematical languages….

*It is a paradigm that was started by Leibniz who realized that time clocks are infinite; hinted at by Einstein who said ‘I seem to be the only scientist who thinks time speeds are different in different regions of the Universe, and finally formalized by this author in the milieu of systems sciences to make it useful for hard science with new mathematical and logic tools. *

As all new paradigms of science however the present stage of studies of the 5th dimension is limited to a few researchers and disputed by the practitioners of the previous paradigm – the study of the 4th dimension of a single space-time continuum. In any case, given the skepticism and limits of ‘reason’ of most humans, who believe in previous scientific paradigms and will not even consider a serious analysis of the 5th dimension, we will start explaining why scientific paradigms keep evolving… and finding resistance from old ones, analyzing the expansion of our point of view of the Universe from subjectivity and religions myths into objective science – a process, which despite the ‘belief’ of many scientists has not ended and won’t probably end with the new paradigm of the 5th dimension, just a step in a quest to find ‘the total information of the Universe, which is only known to itself’ (J.Haldane).

It should not; since according to the laws of the scientific method a new paradigm merely expands the discoveries of the previous one, validating them from a wider perspective.

How can we do that? Thanks precisely to the mathematical and logic rigor of this theory that Leibniz lacked despite its insights in the concepts of ‘relational time’ and ‘fractal space’. And to do so we have to establish with modern rigor what mathematicians and physicists call the ‘geometry’ or metric of space-time – a description with mathematical equations of the elements of a space-time that remain invariant, without change, allowing the stability we perceive in the Universe.

But to do so we cannot longer rely on a shallow, simple mathematical description of it. We need specially to upgrade the logic, perceptive way we do science. It has been too easy for previous paradigms to go onto mathematical equations without knowing what we meant by words such as time (‘what a clock measures’ even if it was said by Mr. Einstein is not really a good definition), space, dimension, wave, particle, information, energy, etc.

Huge errors in physics happen, such as those of Mr. Hawking with his obtuse theories about time travel to the past, information lost in black holes, which become time machines evaporating back in time, ‘—motions’-only theories of a dying Universe, big-bangs that kill it, 10-dimensional strings, etc. etc. because physicists just take a few equations and start to play with numbers and then put words to those numbers without any logic or conceptual rigor; even forgetting how it all started.

Take the concept of time, ‘what a clock measures’. A more sophisticated definition was that of Galileo, V=s/t. All other definitions of time, including Einstein comes from that equation. But what that equation means? Merely the study of how entities change their position in space.

An entity is in A and then it is in B and time has changed that position. So what really time means is ‘change’. And ALL forms of change define a time event. So there are change in the motion and position in space of entities and this is PHYSICAL CHANGE-TIME. It is what Galileo studied. But then there are changes in the morphology, in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings and this is also therefore time, evolutionary time what Biology studies.

Time is change and this definition must precede any disquisitions of the kind physicists do, unaware that if time is change, there are infinite changes in the Universe, hence infinite time clocks. Hence things like Mr. Hawking ‘black holes as time machines’ derived from the use of a SINGLE time-clock, the human clock to measure time ARE just nonsense. Since each clock is independent of all other time clocks of the Universe. But if black holes cannot travel to a single time past then they cannot evaporate.

Further on most physicists unaware that information is also an arrow of time, in fact the most important, tend to spatialize time and consider only a 4th dimension or ‘arrow of time’ towards the future called ‘—motions’. So the Universe dies into the future. Again this is a simplistic reduction. Information is also an arrow of time towards the future. And again if we apply this to Mr. Hawking’s work we solve his paradox of information: because systems do increase information towards the future (so we live longer and learn more, our societies become more complex, stars go towards the center of the galaxy with more form, etc. etc.).

Problem is that for that reason black holes do NOT evaporate, but create mass evaporating our electromagnetic worlds (so if one is made at CERN and other experiments, based in 4D physics and ‘—motions’ wrong theories, we will all die, but that is another story->www.cerntruth.com)

All this said 4 FUNDAMENTAL conclusions of 5D metric that CHANGE completely our perception of reality are:

– The Universe is eternal, made of 2 motions in perpetual e<=>o change, NOT of substances.

– Since the metric of 5D for the whole space-time Universe are the same than the equation which defines the 2 parts of any system, we conclude that we do NOT exist over an independent space-time but we *are made of space and time, each of us is a complex system made of bits of temporal information, of circadian or physical clocks and surfaces of vital space, imprinted by the form of those cyclical in-form-ations.*

In physical systems all scales and particles are background dependent, *constructed with pieces of spatial energy and temporal information, starting with the smallest theoretical scale of *background dependent, lineal, open strings which *are* rods of Planck’s space and cyclical, closed strings which are the tiniest Planck’s time-clocks.

– Since all systems are made of Se and Tƒ, 5D Isomorphisms and laws *apply to all systems of the Universe, *creating a PANTHEIST Universe, a fractal of its Fundamental Particle, the Complementary Systems, SexTƒ=k.

– All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions: *MOTIONS WITH FORM*

**A NEW R=EVOLUTION OF SCIENCE.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ *Steane*

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of space-time organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch*. *

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal, disordered space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its *combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.*

For that reason, we have added for good measure to the quote of Steane, the philosophical thought of Einstein, author of the previous paradigm of 4D space-time, which corresponds to the limit of this model in a single space-time continuum described with a single arrow of time, ENTROPY.

The truly interesting element of Mr. Steane’s definition is however in the final sentence, which is one of those magic clear-cut expressions of reality, coming out of nowhere, like the sentences of Schopenhauer with his intuitions for century to come. Mr. Steane simply understands there is a second arrow of time, information and somehow a third element, which he does not fully recognise but it is there, the third arrow of time, momentum – the present, iterative=repetitive conserved quality, mixture of the other two, which is what the Universe is all about: the reproduction and hence dynamic conservation of momentums composed of informative particles (masses and charges) and entropic motions (speeds), which we integrate into ‘conservative, closed energy world cycles’ – the whole trajectory, life or rather ‘existence’ of any event or process of nature.

In the graph we illustrate the 3 motions≈topologies of time-space.

It must be said a priori that we are here taken concepts of physics to a new level of philosophical understanding to describe the 3 arrows of time – so by entropy we mean the ‘disordered, expansive motion of space’ proper of big-bangs and deaths of matter. Since physicists have a very poor understanding of their concepts but an excellent mathematical praxis describing reality, they make a mess when we realise how different are their ‘dual concepts’.

So entropy is in philosophy of physics disorder, expansive gaseous states, and from here we take the concept, *enlarged to all scales, as philosophy of physics has done, but only to disorder, expansive motion, which are 1/3rd of the motions that take place in a ‘world cycle’ of time (you can consider it as ‘one of the diameters’ of the π-cycle)… *

*W*hile in statistical thermodynamics and mathematical physics (theory of information), entropy is a measure of the ‘ternary paths of future’ available to each ‘partition’ of an ensemble of molecules with a very defined mathematical equation, S=k lnΩ, which we will do properly explain in our introductory article on thermodynamics, and use the concept to study the causality and probabilities species have to take any of those 3 paths

. As systems, we shall find, can evolve only in three directions of space-time, in as much as there are only three type of ‘moving geometries’=topologies; limiting and guiding the ‘formal evolution’ of a system, which will either repeat itself in an iterative path; or warp, increasing its forms, its in-form-ation, in a vortex-like accelerated future, of higher frequency and lesser space, or inversely will expand in a decelerated explosion that erases its information. And we call this ‘big-bang’ death or dissolution of the system, the arrow of entropy and death.

So we clarify *with the guidance of the topological varieties of the Universe* and the foggy concepts of physicists, when interpreting its awesome beauty-equations.

Back to the duality of entropy-only theorists (physicists) and information only theorists (cybernetics), the fault is on the one-dimensional limited mind of man who has an aristotelian logic, of 0 vs. 1, true or false (ab. A-logic), which is NOT the i-logic structure of the Universe (ab. Non-Æ, non aristotelian time logic and non-euclidean fractal space).

So even before we go further to clarify also we are upgrading logic and maths from human single minds into the next ‘letter’, i, the logic of information, the logic beyond Æ, which is a logic of co-existence, between three elements of reality, entropy, information and its momentum-energy combinations in time, of co-exitence of three symmetric topologies of space, the limbs/fields of motion, the wave-bodies of energy and the particle-heads of information, and a logic of co-existence of three fractal scales of ‘being’ the ∆-1 atomic/cellular scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, ecosystemic/gravitational scale of physical and biological systems – we omit often for simplicity the third group of social disciplines with its 3 social classes, scales and topologies of nations and civilisations).

All what exists; all entities of the Fractal Universe including human beings are systems made of two COMPLEMENTARY geometries: languages and heads of information that perceive and guide blind bodies of moving energy.

And we can recognize those complementary puzzles of nature, called in the jargon of Systems Theory, Fractal Points, by their opposite, geometrical shape and properties. Since the cycle is the form that stores more information in lesser space and the line is the fastest distance between two points.

For example, all physical species are made of lineal fields of moving energy, shaped by cyclical particles of information.

All living organisms are made of planar bodies of moving energy guided by spherical heads of information.

All Human societies are made of human citizens, ruled by politicians and priests, who command nations and civilizations with legal and ethic words.