** SUMMARY**

**I:**5D scalar metrics. Fractal principles. Superorganisms through 3 ∆ scales.

**II.**Scalar laws.its

**Dimotions as exchanges of energy and information through ∆±4 planes.**

**IIII:**Physical, biological and sociological scientific scales.

**FOREWORD. **

**ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS **

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * *

*Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

*Einstein*, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’ -whose study is the theme of this blog.

__This blog is dedicated to the organic philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time.__

*The Foreword**, given the encyclopedic nature of the blog, ** tries to explain briefly the meaning of those 2 concepts. It is the same in all posts so you can escape it if you have read it already. The rest of the post will define the ternary scales of all Time-space Organisms, and its entangled ‘pentalogic’ derived of its 5 Dimensional motions of space-time that construct those super-organisms.*

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, *but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.*

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: *

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says.

**General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.**

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

*Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world. *

For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:

The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.

In the next graphs we show 3 classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because *it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.*

Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

We define them two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:

An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

‘**space**‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.

**Time****,** that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

**Scale**, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism

**Mind****.** And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, *which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

**Entropic limits****: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.

All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a **worldcycle** (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s *existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆-1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.*

How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:

Amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

**FUTURE PREDICTABILITY OF 5 D SYSTEMS. ABCDE OF STIENCES**

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (its inverse that evolves form) combined into conservative ‘present’ zero-sum cycles of energy. They are the 3 ‘conserved’ arrows of time that create the futures of each fractal supœrganism, between its 4Dimotion of generation in a lower ∆-1 plane that emerges in an ∆+1 social world to die back in a dissolving explosion of scattering entropy, back to ∆-1 in the moment of death.

Below its worldcycles in terms of its 3 conserved quantities (left), first found in ‘taoism’(center) in terms of yin=information and yang=entropy. On the left an ‘accelerated’ timespace vortex that defines in 5D physics an attractive vortex of spacetime of the quantum scale (charge) or the cosmological one (mass).

Thus the Universe has not only mathematical, spatial continuous but also logic, temporal, cyclical and organic, fractal properties derived of the more complex ¡logic geometry of scalar space and cyclical time.

The ternary properties of the Universe ARE MANDATORY as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, *which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.*

*Yet it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.*

Of the many consequences of that ternary or pentalogic, ∆±¡ STructure of all beings, we shall consider how to use it to predict the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences.

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, tv-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become ‘alive’. In the graph, the predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:

**S: Continuous, spatial mathematical** simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

**T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns** of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses* the information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(**l**) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns*.

**∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – **of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

Deep time leads to a 3^{rd} level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my web at evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress.com that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1^{st} type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales *determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3* ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

L§, former chair of Duality at ISSS

Which leads to a final question: Why humans prefer a mechanical, mathematical simplex view of reality instead of embracing the whole? The answer might not be so much a problem of the Universe but of the human mind; as organisms are self-centered and select information from their point of view. So to be the center of the Universe is a survival strategy, which has made humans as they became over powerful on other organisms of Earth, reject a view of reality more objective, even today as machines clearly evolve into organisms, and we shall return to those themes, in our organic analysis of history and mathematical definition of the mind.

However a philosophy of science is a ‘thought experiment’ not a practical endeavor. So we care only for a profound ‘communion’ with the ultimate whys of reality, trying to understand the Universe as an entangled whole.

Indeed, the philosophy of systems science considering how timespace organisms follow similar laws. In that sense, the method of knowledge of the fractal, organic Universe is quite different from our present way of thought, which is analytic, and cheers the ‘cataloging’ of differences between beings – Systemics is a synthetic method and cheers the finding of similarities between them, extracting ‘disomorphic=equal laws’ .

Humans though embarked in a journey of ‘mechanical, mathematical’ dissection of reality which is fine but made them loose the forest view – and I dare to say most don’t even care anymore to know if they are looking at a forest at all.

The blog though only differentiates the ‘trees’ of the forest in the fourth line, which was meant to be a collaboration with a team of specialized scientists, each one casting his trees on the shadow of the ‘standard’ 12+1 set of ‘Disomorphic laws’ that define the common nature of all time-space organisms explained in the 3rd line (and briefly introduced in the next paragraphs).

As this collaborative effort has not happened the blog is incomplete.

Yet for those interested in the trees, the second line offers quite a ‘tree’ vision of the main sciences of the nested Universe departing from the largest one, the galatom, down to the smallest ones, the mind-languages stored in our infinitesimal neurons.

On my view, as Descartes put it when finishing his much briefer introduction to analytic Geometry on a book which he cherished more for his philosophy of science – as we do – but came to matter more for its maths, the detailed part on specific stiences and species is good enough for a single scholar so ‘I will leave work to be done by future researchers’; Human or more likely AI which will no doubt enjoy the handling of huge data in parallel fashion and will need an organic explanation of why it will soon become conscious 🙂

L§, ¡man . Philosopher of Science.

*exist displaced in time respect to each other: wholes, minds are in the future. So to communicate with their parts and co-exist in simultaneity the true definition of a superorganism, by force they must emit information, from a relative future point to a relative past.*

*It thinks after the actions of the body have happened, which only can be explained if they are in a relative future; proved by non-local gravitation as only if the larger whole, the galaxy, and its black holes emit waves of gravitation to the past, they can travel and surface in a relative non-local present, organizing the simultaneous points of the galatom.*

**‘aT§ymmetries’ between scales and time.**

**The mind**which causes the why of its existence as it reflects in a smaller mirror the larger wholes and project them into its territorial order of vital space that becomes an image of the whole.

**The superorganism in space performs action**s with all other scales, with a hierarchical order, that takes entropic motion from the quanta of the lower ∆-4 scale, pixels of information from the ∆-3 scale, of feeding energy from the ∆-2, emits seeds of reproduction from the ∆-1 and evolves socially with similar ∆º beings into larger ∆+1 supœrganisms inscribed into a larger ∆+2 world…

**entropy in scales**means the dissolution and descend into a lower plane that releases ITS FORMS, and define the conservation laws of Nature, expanded beyond the 3 conservations of momentum and energy of a single plane, to the conservation of 3 Planes together form each ‘relative event centered at ∆º’

**I. 5D METRIC SCALES **

*In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein. Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.*

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine *New Scientist*^{1 }published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.^{2}

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

Let us then prove the fractal paradigm, the true evolution of cosmology, with the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

** Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe**

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:^{3}

With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth^{4} showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot^{5} gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the logic and mathematical principles of the fractal paradigm, starting for what fractal relativists mean when they say that the Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time. To that aim, we apply to the understanding of masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

**THE FIFTH DIMENSION.**

If *time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.*

So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them.

As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).

All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.

As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature.

So this is the first ‘organic property’ of the fractal Universe, and the symbolism is rather simple, ∆ for scales of size, ±¡ to order them. 3 enough to create an organism:

Scales are the main ISOMORPHISMS. The universe is made of fractal organisms, which co-exist in 3 scales of reality.

All systems deploy three scales of co-existing structure, the cellular, individual and social scales with different speeds of time. So *smaller systems have faster time clocks that carry more information and code larger systems.*

The tenant of GST (ab. systems theory) applied to history is that ‘memes’ not genes, ideas and instruments are the genetic codes that create social systems and civilisations. Hence languages and cultures matter more than individuals coded by biological genes. Let us then explore the two elements of the organic fractal Universe, its scalar structure and three arrows of time and world cycles to define history as a super organisms and memetics as its theory of information:

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

*Thus smaller systems run faster time cycles that store more information and hence for that reason smaller beings code larger beings, and genes code living organisms and humans economic ecosystems of bigger machines and human social organisms.*

So we exist in a game of reproduction of information with biological, organic patterns. And to organise all those time cycles of information, we need to introduce ‘the scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe – the formal cornerstone of systems sciences, complexity and theory of information, as it establishes the different roles of the 3 scales of beings:

∆+1: the world in which the being exists, from where its…

∆º: organic/thermodynamic/individual scale obtain its quanta of motion, energy and information to survive as an individual and reproduce and evolve socially as a whole. So:

∆-1: the minimal quanta of action in space-time IS what we call ‘a drive of existence (biological jargon), action (physical jargon) or ‘meme’ (social jargon), which codes the system and helps it to survive.

And we divide those actions into ‘simplex’ and ‘complex’ actions, according to the level of reality they code:

∆o-1: simplex actions code the ternary elements of the organism as an individual in a present space-time scale, absorbing entropy to move the limbs, absorbing energy to feed the body and reproduce its ‘cellular goods’ and information for the head to perceive:

In graph, all systems are made of networks of energy and information which join similar clone cells/ citizens as parts of whole superorganisms thanks to a common language of information (genes in the scales of cells, memes in the human scale).

So before we introduce a human historic super organism, we shall consider laws for all kind of species.

MEMES CODE SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY AS GENES CODE BIOLOGICAL SUPERORGANISMS.

In the fractal paradigm, which i helped to formalise at the turn of the century, the fundamental concept is the transmission of information between super organisms, of any scale of the Universe.

In all cases the law of the ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, which rules such transmissions is quite simple:

‘Information is stored in the lower scale of size of the super-organism, on the faster frequency and form of its time-cycles’.

So quantum numbers of the particle scale code atoms, electronic orbitals of the atomic scale code molecules, genes of the molecular scale code biological organisms, and memes of the neuronal and social scale code historic super organisms.

*This means that social super organisms are NOT coded informatively by genes – the wrong, racist idol-ogical theory of our metal-masters – but by memes, neuronal networks of thoughts and external works of ‘art’ and ‘literature’ – mostly religious or political ethic codes.*

** **

**The 3 geometries of physical scales.**

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metrics: Se x Tƒ = K:

- In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Se or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Se= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Se (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).

- In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.

- On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

Now in this quantum scale time goes ‘much faster’ than in our universe, so when we take measure of it, we actually cannot easily differentiate a spatial and a temporal vision of it. And so the question which is always discussed as if it is a wave density or a wave probability can be interpreted both ways due to the duality inherited to the Universe: it is an electron moving so fast that we cannot see it in a given point and when we capture it is the sum of the points it travels though, or it is a sum of fractal bosons? This is my preferred solution albeit not the standard one.

Ultimately it does not matter to me as duality is essential to my understanding of the Universe. Populations in time and forms in space use the same maths because they ‘ARE’ co-existing. One is NOT more truth than the other because PLANES OF THE 5^{TH} DIMENSION CO-EXIST, so while right now your whole is static in form, your cells are busy, busy moving. This is what never got through the mind of humans who see ONLY one thing at a time, and what fascinates me of quantum dualities – they DO prove 5D metrics.

This said we could introduce understanding that there are ALWAYS 4 true model perspectives the iƒ, informative, Ti, clock-like moving, Se-space and Sp-kinetic energy perspective…. Using the simplest of the 4 (latter analyzed), the Newtonian, Tƒ perspective of gravitation NOT the more complex, iƒ-informative Einstein’s analysis of space-time as still, formal geometry…

Now the analysis of all the elements of space in the 3 scales of physical systems (Se-light space, ST-waves and Tƒ cyclical time clocks) will be obviously too extensive for this introduction so we merely will consider here a few themes:

– First define the relationship between space and energy: se and sp, two sides of the same coin by introduce the still-moving lineal and cyclical parts (Galileo’s paradox and Holographic principle of bidimensionality of time and space state).

– Then study together the space and time symmetries, which is the form and function of the different parts of beings as Tƒ, Tiƒ, Se, Sp.

– Then study together the 5D planes and space symmetry, which explains the fractal structure of the Universe. We shall consider the philosophical aspects of space as a fractal through different 5Dimensions (in other posts we formalize it with fractal equations).

– Finally to consider in other posts the analysis of Tƒ, ST wave and Se fields.

We have study the Tƒ-cyclical time vortices masses and charges, unifying them through the metrics of the fifth dimension in the isomorphism of the zero point.

– Se: We will consider revisiting special relativity the meaning of the Se-field or light speed, which is the constant of space of our Universe (hence a fixed parameter) both in philosophical and mathematical terms. But this part will be put on the description of the first scale of reality – that of light space (∆-3).

And we shall study some elements of the ST-wave transformations, which communicate the two Tƒ, and Se fields in our universe in the analysis of light space-time, as it is really the mother fall battles.

So basically here we give an over all geometric-topological understanding of the space-symmetry, which will be further analyzed in physical terms of parity and chirality on the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} lines.

So what changes as we move into larger sizes of the Universe?

The simplest ternary fractal analysis is that of the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale; but as we already know the Universe can divide any ternary system into sub-fractal scales. So we can keep adding intermediate scales. All in all, we human beings do NOT have an infinite perception of all the scales of the 5^{th} dimension. So with the information we have, the following scales are ‘self-evident’, because they do have an Energy ‘different formula’, a different space/action constant, a time clock or similar scalar parameter and finally a scaling around the 10^{10} scales.

** Planes of the 5 ^{th} dimension from the human p.o.v.; its key features, unresolved questions and 5D innovations.**

So from the human perspective, the ∆±4 physical scales will be (we shall add some important features of each scale, as each one should be formed by social evolution of the previous one, but not so ‘simply’ as each new scale implies a full transformation and the addition of a new ‘time clock’ and creation of a new ‘space quanta’, so it is not ‘as simple’ as physicists think – just finding an equation for it):

__– ∆-4: Invisible forces. Gravitational quanta?__ Planck scale? Neutrino background scale? Final spatial scale of entropy-motion? How it relates to magnetism, spin and the theoretical string scale? Does it go faster than c-speed? It is the dark energy of the cosmological scale? It is gravitational transversal repulsive waves? Neutrino-antineutrino theory of light formation? Higgs field? Higgs particle? Scalar non-spinning scale? Or 2 spin?

This scale is full of interrogations. It cannot be otherwise, since even if we can reconstruct the scale with the help of the isomorphic method by homology with other scales; it is beyond the quanta of human perception (light) and so it will NEVER have full confirmation. Further on all attempts to perceive the ‘dark world’, will bring levels of entropy that will destroy our world, and this is what researchers of the dark world at institution like CERN with their abstract, mathematical only view of reality forget: an extinct scientist knows nothing. Curiosity kills the cat. We shall explore it in our post on 5D cosmology.

__– ∆-3: Minimal bit of human information.__ Visible forces. Light quanta. Fundamental equations. E=h (space quanta) v (time frequency). Whereas h is the minimal quanta of information of the electron and hence human mind, and as such is expressed in ‘angular momentum’ as an informative step, Sp≈Tƒ, to construct minds and forms of the quantum world.

We shall call this minimal ‘quanta’, a Planckton (by similarity with the minimal quanta of sea-life and honoring Planck), which gathers into photons.

–__ ∆-2: Minimal bit of human energy. __Thermal forces. Heat quanta. Fundamental equation. Boltzmann: E= ‘n’ k (entropy-space quanta) T (temperature: time frequency). We shall call k a ‘boltz’, the minimal unit of entropic motion based on heat at molecular level, which depending on the different directions of motion of gases (3 arrows of motion), diatomic molecules (5) or tri-atomic molecules (6), will be ‘packed’ with higher density, and depending on the degrees of temperature will vibrate faster with higher total energy.

–__ ∆-1: Human Cellular/Physical Magnetic scale: __ µ_{o} is therefore the quanta of space. Energy=µ E x B, the equation.

And the unit of action, the magnetic domains.

Here there is the first clear split between biological and physical systems, as they diverge in the social growth. In matter it is clearly the scale of magnetism, where ‘magnetic domains of the 10^{10} scaling order of atoms create a magnetic domain, in which the dominant most energetic atoms of the Universe, iron-nickel become top predators and use the ‘Sp-quanta’, µ, to gather enormous strength and control the next scale of creation of huge magnetic-mass systems (planets with iron centers, protected by magnetic membranes).

The human cellular scale however is still controlled mainly despite some magnetic elements observed in certain cellular-simpler insect scales of life by the thermodynamic scale.

It is in this scale of maximal scientific observation (and the next human scales, though one does not observe himself properly, and since information is higher in lower scales the ∆-1 scale is by far the most objective, better known), where we can see the whole richness of relationships and organic interconnections of all the planes, forces, quanta, clocks in an enormous complexity of relationships, which however we suppose to exist in all scales if humans did have the same capacity to perceive them.

– __∆o: Human, Individual scale: Matter states.__

Here in the ternary symmetry of ‘states’ of matter, the maximal temperature, entropic gas< balanced E xI liquid > Tƒ, solid, crystal colder scale.

This is the realm of Temperature for humans, interacting with gravitation. It is also the realm of temperature, gravitation and magnetism for physical systems.

G (Gibbs energy) = S x T + PdV, which for a closed system, without change of volume reduces to E= ST is the equation, where the energy available for the scale, emerging from the lower scales of molecular energy is the product of the entropy (S) and Temperature. Where entropy now uses the Gas constant in which we again ‘grow in scale’, now multiplying the Boltzmann constant per mole, 2 jump of 10^{+10 }scales – though properly it should be only one ‘scaling’, but as this is done by humans, humans do jump in the measuring of this scale to the ∆+1 level, 2 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

In a non-human world, a mole would be 10^{10} times smaller, which is the proper scale of the Universe, and very likely the scale at which observing atomic substances, in the same way we observe the creation of magnetic domains with 10^{10} atoms, we would observe ‘somewhat’ units of order at least in liquid states (gases being purely entropic states of maximal motion will be likely free in a larger degree.)

As the reader can observe it is closely related to the ∆-2 scale, and this should not surprise him. As indeed one of the more fascinating laws of the isomorphic method is the similarity of systems when we jump an scale (remember they invert values in contiguous 5D planes).

So for example, we are making the next scale of life-size, metal-robots, which look like insects, our lower scale but at a much larger size. Nations resemble cells, two scale below, in the bio-sociological world. And humans in a factory resemble the RNA molecules ruling their cells and working reproducing materials moving around under the management of the fixed ‘white collar DNAs’. Those are NOT metaphors but true similarities.

– ∆+1: H__uman, social Mechanical scale. __Now we do enter fully the gravitational scale, for motions. And the equation is that related to wait, speed and energy:

E=1/2mv^{2} and the ‘clocks’ the speed that multiplies the fractal steps according to its rhythm, better understood in a ‘wave in motion’: v= l x ƒ.

Of course if we want to analyze it in a more subjective human perspective the ‘step of space’ is the meter humans jump when they run in each step and the second humans use to measure all its ‘synchronic motions’ – the time of an eye perceptive glimpse, a mind thought, a heart beat and a step.

– __∆+2: Planetary, Gravitational Scale:__ E=mgh. The quanta of space action being obviously for the local gravitational planet in which humans display its actions g, the 10 m/second acceleration

– ∆+3: __Galactic scale:__ E=Mc^{2}. Here, while we are still in the Gravitational general ∆+ scale, we depart from the human gravitational world and move further up in the scale entering the realm of cosmology. And now we reach the limit of our entropic speed, light speed. And so it is no longer possible to go beyond. So suddenly c becomes a constant and there is a ‘reversal of function’, yet a c2 is the space-entropy element of the equation and mass the time

Proper ‘ether’ interpretation: c^{2}= √4π k/µ; whereas 4π k is the charge curvature or gradient of attraction-repulsion between 2 particles (the equivalent to the tension of a wave),the cyclical Tƒ, element and µ the magnetic constant, the or relative density of ‘magnetic nano-loops’.

– __∆+4: Cosmic scale: Dark world. __And so we arrive to the limit of our perception, the world of dark energy. Where repulsive gravitation is dark energy, the galaxy-atom the entity of existence, its internal world of gravitation, ruled by the limit of c speed. Its outer world beyond c speed. Its constant, the cosmological constant… But this is beyond our perception and studying this scale will only bring our demise as a species, because it is beyond the limits of energy and information we can perceive.

**II. FRACTAL PRINCIPLES**

**Absolute time: Social evolution of wholes. ‘Stiences’ & Exist¡ence.**

In the graph the sentient, scalar, topo-bio-logic Universe of ¬∆@st of spatial minds, moving through worldcycles time as fractal organisms requires new ‘foundational properties’ to explain its exist¡fences traveling through social scales of the fifth dimension.

In the graph, the question in a world of Time cycles, regarding what is absolute past and future is solved logically:

If we can go upwards on scales, as we create with parts wholes, we can go downwards in scales as we dissolve wholes into parts, and those two inverse directions will be then by convention the relative past – the dissolution ‘arrow’ or dimotion of time-space, general called ‘entropy – and the relative future of the whole, social evolution of parts into wholes, which is obvious a relative future for the entity as it needs first to gather the parts and then evolve them, but relative in terms of ‘lineal physicists’ single time, as at the end of your life you dissolve in a death explosion of entropy. So while in ‘short lineal time’ you end up dying into entropy, for the whole Universe and for the beings within it on the long term the arrow that matters and constantly evolves into wholes is the fifth dimension which is made of DEEP time space, of a series of co-existing scales put together, symbiotic and therefore organic.

Indeed, you live co-existing with the plane of cells and within your world and so the Universe is organic because it co-exists in scales.

It is then also obvious that ‘exist¡ence’, from seed through life back to the cellular/atomic scale after death of a system is indeed a travel through the scales of ‘stience’, each one defined by an ¡-plane; hence the slightly change term of exist¡ence.

I use then the word existence or rather ‘exist¡ence, playing with the word ‘st¡ence’, instead of life for two reasons:

All systems, physical, biological and social do follow the same motions in the fifth dimension. And the fifth dimension allow us to answer questions we have never imagined we could answer in mathematical, scientific, precise terms – seemingly metaphysical questions such as the meaning of existence.

*Absolute past and future, co-exist in **relative **present.*

We enter a far more profound and enriching lanscape of meanings regarding time=motion and space=form, and the relative concepts of past, present and future, which repeat themselves in cyclical patterns. So the next big question on time-space is what is the relative and absolute past, present and future of beings.

The key concept then to understand the most interesting feature in time of the fractal Universe Is co-existence: for entanglement of the 3 parts of a system, they must co-exist in time present, by merging its two arrows from future to past and past to future.

The mind does lives in the relative future of the body, which lives in the relative future of the energy fields that move it.

**The formalism of the 5 dimensions: metric equation.**

*In the graph, different ‘length of time-clocks in physical systems’ according to 5D metric: *

*Max. $t = min. ð§ , L² x ƒ =K*

In the graph, the ∆º±¡ three quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational main scales and main E(st) = $t x ð§ Equations of the physical Universe.

And beyond the unobserved dark world. Above, the different behaviour of those systems, depending on which region they are – close to the limits of ð§ and $t of the system (in a lower or upper border of the 5D level) or ‘across’ the system, which is where the metric of the fifth dimension remains constant.

Dimensions are defined formally by a metric. This means a system of equations that allow to describe how *a system travels through the dimension of space and time.*

The formal metric of the scalar Dimensions of the Universe is based in the co-existence of 3 fractal scales in all supœrganisms, where it holds the metric: $ (size in space) x ð (speed of time clocks) = Constant world/superorganism.

In this post we shall study the FRACTAL PRINCIPLES OF INVERSION AND SELF-SIMILARITY BETWEEN THOSE SCALES, whose fundamental ¡logic law is the negation of the negation. That is: ‘Systems repeat its form jumping through 2 scales’

A ‘co-invariant metric’ equation, which doesn’t change the product of the parameter of space (size) and time (speed of cycles of information) allow *travels through and hence defines a dimension of space-time.*

*Thus the fifth dimension exists because it has a metric.*

*We shall then define in the fifth dimension a new functional, made of all possible Complex DImotions in the fifth dimension, which we shall call the function of exist¡ence.*

*Since existence is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension ,as we are born in a smaller scale as a fast ‘seed’, and then grow in size while diminishing in our ‘metabolic speed’ till emerging in a larger world, in which as we ‘increase our territorial order and property, engaging with society’, we diminish again our speed of action-reaction cycles, till when we die we travel down the fifth dimension.*

*This happens to all systems of the Universe born in a lower plane as a seed, emerging, slowing down as they get ‘connected’ to the larger world and finally loosing all motion in its moment of maximal ‘territorial property’, when you die.*

*So how this works, when we expand 3 dimensions, whose travels are obvious – motions in 3D or 3D+ lineal time duration, in galilean and Einstein’s relativity, which give birth to a ‘worldline’? Easy, adding dimensions which allow the being to travel from small size to larger size, in the life-death cycle from seminal seed to being back to cellular state in death. And as a line when we add dimensions becomes a cycle, we talk no longer of worldlines but of worldcycles. Let us see this in more details, since we have already defined the metric equation of 5D: spe x tƒ (size in space x speed in time) = K.*

In the graph the fundamental equation of the fifth dimension, is its co-invariant metric, Space size x Time clock speed = Constant. Since smaller spatial sizes have after informative clocks, coding the larger wholes that control it through its enclosure membranes and higher energy. So quantum numbers code atoms and molecules, which code genetically super organisms and matter states, which conform the gravitational world.

Further on this metric equation, defines according to Klein ‘a mathematical dimension’, as a ‘coinvariant metric of space-time’, through which is possible to travel.

How we travel through the scalar Universe that complements the ‘3 topological space-time dimensions of lineal space-motions, wider, reproductive motions, and tall, informative motions’ , with 2 more dimensions, one ‘downward of entropy’, and one upwards of social evolution into wholes?

Easy the travel through the 5 Dimensions of space-time is called the worldcycle of life and death that all organisms follow. As all of them travel through its scales, born as seminal seeds, with faster clocks of time in the lower dimension; ∆-1, emerging as we slow down our metabolic clocks in the organic/thermodynamic dimension, within a larger ∆+1 world, in which we become just a ‘cellular fractal point of a larger social or gravitational organism, to die back into the ∆-1 components in the ‘big-bang of death’, which the dual arrows of e<=>mc² express for matter.

We thus establish a simple law of bidimensionality or holographic principle, resolving the galilean paradox, considering that all dimensions of form are associated to a dimension of motion. The manifestations of this duality are multiple. For example, the complementarily of the particle-form state and the wave-motion state of physical systems. The duality of mind-still perception and body-motion perception. And so on. But we can resume mathematically in terms of dimensions the Galilean paradox with a simple equation D (s ) = D(t), the dimensions of space-form and time-function are symmetric.

We shall call motions down 2 planes of the fifth dimensions as the ‘four dimension of pure entropy’ and two motions upwards, through the mind-singularity actions, the fifth dimension proper, or dimension of social evolution, in which *the system no longer travels through a single space-time continuum and/or its adjacent ∆±1 planes, as when a wave moves reproducing its form on the lower entropic field, but ‘bores’ a hole through scales of its scalar structure going down two scales in a death explosion of disorganisation of its information: ST∆ø<<∑∆-2, or absorbs entropy and energy from its inner vital space to act on the outer world as a mind: ST∆-1>>ST∆+1.*

So *for a full description of a system, we need the 3 (∆±1) topological dimensions of lineal open motion, steady state iteration, and inwards implosive information, which can be described within 2 adjacent planes and the ∆±2 pure entropy and pure form ‘limits’ of the fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of the Universe (5s = 5t).*

AND WHY not to name the two directions of the scalar Universe with the same ‘number’? Basically because they are non-commutative. In motions in time and scale, the past is NOT equal to the future, and entropic death is not equal to mental, social life.

So we need two different conceptual dimension, entropy, the fourth dimension of space-time (seen in S-form as a big-bang expansion in space, in T-motion as a function of dissolution and death), which is the ‘so called in physics and its simpler models of reality, the ‘only arrow of time’). And the fifth inverse arrow of social evolution. The differences between those 2 arrows are many and so are the mathematical functions we use to describe them.

Thus to proper describe the complexity of an organism, we just need 10 dimensions: 3 of time, past, present and future, 3 of space, its 3 bidimensional topologies or 3 standard ‘lineal dimensions, 3 of ‘∆±i-planes (with its decametric §cales of growth) as all beings co-exist in a larger world and are made of smaller parts, and finally the ‘membrain’ (monad or mind), which closes the ‘open ball’ of 9 dimensions, with its sensorial enclosure membrain that lets entropy, energy and information sip into the being, and its linguistic zero-sum singularity that maps the whole and commands its behaviour.

As such all super organisms of space-time follow the same laws, as they are made of the same substances. And so we start by a dimensional, static analysis of the being and its 10 dimensions, provided by a simple ‘generator equation’ of each ‘T.œ”.

T.œ then becomes the briefest way to explain it all, as a Timespace œrganism, and also as the Theory of Everything organic, such as: **T.œ= ∑t.œs.** This is then the simplest conceptual definition of reality.

To understand 5 Dimensional physics, and the scales of physical systems, we must first translate the metric of the 5th dimension in terms of physical constants and parameters of space-quanta, temporal frequency and ‘constant conserved present energy’:

$t x ð§ = E ∆±i.

And its generator form of space-time systems:

Γ: $t≤∑∏≥ ð§, to the jargon of physical systems and its larger, simpler supœrganisms.

*-ð§: Smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.*

*-Spe:Bigger wholes deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘body-waves’ of energy, and co-exist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.*

In most systems, the *metric law ∆*±i refers only to 3 planes that co-exist together, where the metric applies directly (biological systems at the cellular, individual and species scale ).

Yet physical systems are the largest of the ‘nested’ Russian dolls of the Universe. So the scales are enormous.

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. $ t), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, ð§ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

The 4 basic scales of mathematical physics, the galactic, ∆+1, gravitational light space-time scale, the thermodynamic, temperature, molecular, matter scale, ∆, the atomic and particle, ∆-1 scale and the dark world beyond galaxies, or cosmological scale, ∆+2, wrongly considered to follow the same laws that the ∆+1 galactic scale described by Einstein’s Relativity principles.

In the graph, we hint at a repetition of those scales, which in physical properties might be infinite as we find an astonishing symmetry between galaxies and atoms, which are unified mathematically with 5D metric (unification equation of forces: masses and charges).

Further on, when we look within those ‘large scales’, the quantum, thermal and gravitational world have sub-scales and forces that emerge into each other (the magnetic domains, which act in the 3 scales, the ¥-rays, whose frequencies carry energy and information across all) that structures the largest ‘whole’ fully understood, the galaxy, as a single supœrganism, over which we can ‘cast’ the different ‘stientific perspective’ of knowledge:

A simplex mathematical description, akin to that of the atom; a more complex biological analysis of its parts and cycles that make the galaxy (and by extension the atom) akin to a cell and finally a metaphysical disquisition about the informative, sentient and reproductive qualities of its centres (quarks and black holes). While we shall escape all together the more metaphysical question about the apperception of atoms and galaxies, the biological properties of both are unavoidable to make a proper description of it. And once we have understood the ‘ego paradox’, that makes humans reject vital properties to non-anthopomorphic beings, ignore the qualms of orthodoxy.

Physical experiments are concerned with those 3 planes of the physical Universe, (the particle and cosmic scales), to which Complexity and its T.Œ (Theory of the Organic Everything), ads its models within the organic paradigm that reveals information about its structure at a higher level than the minimalist description through locomotions and integrals of its worldlines.

*In this post we shall explore those 4 scales, which we define in detail in the 3rd line, plane by plane of the 5th dimension. Their main feature is the symmetry respect to the human mind-center of its two fundamental entities, ∆-1 charges and ∆+1 masses, at the level of atoms and galaxies. Thus we divide roughly the stience of astrophysics in ∆≥+1 astronomy and ∆≤o: physics.*

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser space’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

And this happens, because the universe of scales of space-time has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a body-wave of energy.

So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. *And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:*

Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.

And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

And we resume this with a simple equation, which is in science call the ‘metric equation’ of a dimension of space-time, in this case the 5th dimension of scalar, organic systems, which is the arrow of future of the Universe:

*5D metric*: $t (spatial size) x ð§ (temporal clocks of information= ∆-constant

That is, the product of the speed of information and entropy of the system remains constant, so smaller and larger beings can co-exist together in present.

And we call this ‘constant of present’ Energy.

For example, a fly thinks 10 times faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can co-exist.

And of course it applies to physics, as masses are vortices of time information, which end its world cycle of existence in the explosive dimension of entropy and death in a cyclical, fractal Universe, in which big-bang means merely the E<=>Mc² death side of Einstein equation.

But *this equation runs the other way around creating mass, collapsing entropy into mass. In fact Einstein first wrote it as M=E/c², in a landmark paper, explaining how gravitation could create mass out of entropy, as those strangelets and black holes, do collapsing light mass into heavy mass particles, as galaxies do, collapsing vacuum space into gravitational mass.*

And true physics needs both arrows of time.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information.

**II. SCALAR LAWS.**

*In the graph to reproduce all the planes of existence of the Human being, the speed of creation of adjacent spaces must be in a 10 ^{±10} lower order than the light space quanta which have just to reproduce its ‘envelop’ of frequency over the gravitational quanta of ‘longitudinal neutrinos’. *

*Human stiences study micro or macro-organisms, tied up by organic networks of energy and information.*

Stiences study the Disomorphic=Equal formal laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Ðimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.

the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…

*Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.*

*In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity: *

– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.

* – Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.*

Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.

Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.

Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.

It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).

The deepest understanding of the Universe which is a fractal OF TIME-motion, not of space-form (the static Maya of the sense, the language, the mirror, the mind that stops reality), comes then *when we fully account for the different motions from past to future and future to past in each local system, for its cycles, synchronicities and co-existences. *

One example will suffice: Maxwell’s electromagnetic radiation has 2 solutions in time. One that travels to the past called the collapsing wave, and one that travels to the future called the expansive wave. Einstein insisted all his life without knowing how to solve the conundrum that the 2 solutions were real. Physicists ended up discharging the solution of ‘traveling to the past’, in which the ‘wave collapsed’. Then Feynman calculated that IF THE TWO SOLUTIONS WERE REAL, both cancelled each other to create light as an ETERNAL present. This is indeed the case. The co-existence of ‘past’, ‘shrinking waves of light’, (traveling to the ¡-1 plane) and future, expansive spatial waves (traveling to the ¡+1 scale) cancel to the create a ‘constant light speed’ in present, which is the background spacetime of our galaxy.

So we have a general equation, studied in depth in our articles of time that relate, scales and time states to create a simultaneous super organism in present:

Past (smaller parts, entropy-death dissolving motions) x Future (informative particles/heads arrows) = Present (repetitive body-waves).

This also works for minds. Researchers realized that the body seems to ‘act’ before we detect the ‘thoughts’ that actually causes the motion of the body. It is a huge mystery. How the ∆º body networks of the ∆-1 cells can act ‘before’ the ∆+1 mind that makes it act gives the order?

Because in the fractal Universe of different arrows of time from past to future, future to past, and present to present, the 3 co-exist displaced in time. You must imagine the co-existing scales, as OCCUPYING THE SAME PLACE IN SPACE, BUT HAVING A ‘LATITUDE’ FROM PAST TO FUTURE IN TIME. So as the next graph illustrates, the Future whole sends a message to the past parts, and the scientist that measures the process in the ‘co-existing present’, sees FIRST the reaction of the ‘past’ body-cells and then sees the ‘future firing’ an electromagnetic MESSAGE from the ‘waves of the brain’ THROUGH its nervous system, such as this travel from future to past, which lasts a time v=s/t (motion duration) is cancelled by the ‘interval from future to past jumped by the message’ ‘-t’, so -t + t = 0, the 3 scales co-exist synchronically in present, and so the cells, the networks and the head-mind move together without ‘dislocating’. Internally they have a time latitude from past parts to future brain, externally they seem a co-existing present.

But for the simplex humind and its concept of an absolute LINEAL TIME from past to FUTURE only, it all seems as the past parts determine the future whole – human mind (remember humans beyond their egocy – ego+idiocy – are far less intelligent than the Universe, as we HAVE A SINGLE ARROW OF TIME CONSCIOUSNESS in the mind).

If you extend this concept to every other ‘science’ and scale things start to fall into place. For example, GRAVITATION seems no local, but it is in fact an informative language, sent from the future to the past by the ‘brain of galaxies’ = black holes. And those gravitational waves create non-local, instantaneous gravitation as it happens with electromagnetism between atoms but at the larger cosmological scale, so all seems an eternal present. The metaphysical questions rising from this co-existence are not the them of this post though. We just have to introduce 5D and time travels at a simple level

** THE ISOMORPHIC LAWS OF THE 5TH DIMENSION:**

In the graph some ‘funny’ features of pentalogic reality. The 3 parts of a system have ‘different topologies in space’, exist in different ‘ages of time’, and are in different ‘scales’ of reality *yet they manage to co-exist as a whole seen in a single plane, seemingly in a single present, and apparently as a single whole topology closed by its membrane. *

Below the world cycle which is again a single zero-sum, present because death ‘plummets’ the slow evolution of the arrow of information towards future wholes dissolving the whole into its past WITHOUT CROSSING THE PRESENT SLOW BUILDING UP OF INFORMATION, DYNG IN A SINGLE QUANTA OF TIME. So we define two directions:

Slow life arrow, as the parts build the whole through 3 ages of increasing information.

Fast single time quanta of death dissolution.

SO the whole concept of the dimensional existence of a super organism turns around its ternary symmetries in topology, scale and ages of time THAT CANCEL the extremes to create present states at ∆º, ø topology and present age.

So travels in time, including the whole world cycle of life and death respect the ST¡ ternary symmetries of the Universe (of Spatial topologies, Time ages and I-scales), always end up in a zero sum for all entities.

Whereas ∆ is the symbol for both the ternary symmetries and scalar structure of the Universe. As it is Delta in Greek we use as synonymous, Ð≈∆ and talk of the ∆¡motions or actions or 5Ð elements of reality.

1.We shall thus study in 3 sections, the general 5 D metrics first.

2.Then the scales of all super organisms, **∆§, which i**n a spatial synchronous way perform actions across those scales, *traveling within the superorganism up and down past to future an future to past*.

**3.T@:** And then in a temporal way as the wholes superorganism travel in an external larger world making its existence a travel through its higher scales of the fifth dimension.

The 5th dimension is the concept that unifies all sciences and forms and motions of the Universe. Life is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension of parts that become wholes by the power of eusocial love, as those parts become synchronized, with smaller faster cells/atoms coding information for larger wholes, who moved them in synchronicity; taking advantage of the dual arrows of entropy, which is null in a single plane where parts bond into wholes, null in motion coming downwards from wholes and null in genetic, reproductive information coming from smaller parts.

It is through the laws of the 5th dimension and its inverse entropies and conservation laws how the design of the Universe happens. The way we describe that interaction is through the equation of ¬Æ, which apply to any relative Œn±1 super organism tracing a world cycle of existence, and its ternary a(nti)symmetries in 5D Fractal space and cyclical time. As we define the generic laws of all systems in the first line, we do in this 3rd line merely enunciate its basic laws to then put examples of those laws in each of its main scales and ternary groups of superorganism (space symmetry) tracing a world cycle (time antisymmetry) across such 3 scales of reversed entropy and conservation laws (5D asymmetry):

*In the graph, all the parts≈species of the Universe have a multi-layered structure, as all its systems have 3 unifying features:*

*They exist occupying a ‘fractal space’.**They last a finite duration of time.**They have an organic structure of parts and wholes co-existing in 3 ‘different scales of spatial size’ and 3 ‘different speeds’ on its finite time cycles. So all organisms co-exist in a cellular, faster, individual and a social, slower, ecosystemic scale.*

*And all physical systems co-exist in a quantum, faster, thermodynamic, human and gravitational, larger, cosmic scales.*

*The order of all those species according to its inverse spatial size and speed on its time cycles, create the metric of the scalar, 5th dimension, the unifying principle missed in human sciences, despite the fact that science is indeed the result of the study of those larger and smaller scales with mechanical instruments (telescopes and microscopes).*

*So we can define each science as the study of the species of one of those scales of size, and philosophy of science as the theory that seeks for the common laws of all of them. That is the content of a T.Œ (Unification theory of all sciences), which necessarily must be based in the ‘common properties’ of all them, its aforementioned spatial, temporal and organic, multilayered structure.*

Since the Universe is a tapestry, sum of all the space-time beings there are, whose laws and finite cycles of life and death, forms in space and combined ‘space-time åctions’, should have certain underlying ‘isomorphisms’, similarities, derived of their ultimate substances, spaces and times.

Thus by understanding better the nature of space and time, we shall deduce fundamental laws able to unify our understanding of all the species of all the sciences. This is the ultimate meaning of a Theory of Everything based in Leibniz’s model of a Universe of infinite times, latter validated by relativity, and infinite spaces with energy and motion, latter validated by Quantum theory.

Thus, since now for a century, the model of a Universe of infinite time clocks and fractal, vital spaces, has been also proved by experimental physics it is rather surprising that it has not been properly formalized, mathematized and used in a more scholarly form, to study all the species of reality as they are – a tapestry of broken space forms and time motions. This is the purpose of this blog.

**The game of existence: space-time actions across 5 D scales.**

The game of existence is a ternary game of dimensions of form and motion, combined in bidimensional networks of fractal points, each one a whole world in itself, but also an infinitesimal indivisible, Œ-point. Being thus switch in its 3 fundamental coordinates of existence, from its subjective point of view or o-mind x ∞ Universe = constant world perception of it all, and surf around those 3 fundamental coordinates with the will of its exchangeable åctions.

What to do at each step of existence, the inner time clock with its frequency accelerating cycles towards the vortex of death, is a mystery, which we call freedom.

Shall i eat, ∆e, or shall i fuck ∆œ, shall i share my energy and information with all other humans and love, ∆U, shall i devolve and die, by error by desire, by the sheer inertia of the game?

Actions thus are performed by beings, within a larger mainframe, that of the planes and world and larger Universes of the 5th dimension. The electron moves, but the magnetic field generated by the larger gravito-magnetic field orders it socially.

Parts that become wholes thus become the åctions that integrates all other åctions:

∆+1=∫æ,e,ï,œ,û ds dt. And this is the function of existence, which integrates into the action of a super organism, Uœ¡, sum of a networks of its cellular, Œ¡, points of existence.

The 5th isomorphism deals with the wholeness questions of the being, as a species, which not only lives across 3 U±1 planes in relationship to its Uo point, thus shares energy and information across different planes of existence of the Universe, with infinitesimals and wholes, which make the individual a relative point in a larger Universe.

*The relative i=0 of the still point-mind merely determine the way a system obtains its* energy and information, in its specific details, as the ‘fractal’ of infinite Planes of existence varies them in decametric ‘notches’, which become variations of further ‘decametric notches’.

Since those elements are in any given system absorbed, according to the non-commutative laws that define transfers of energetic motion and in-form-ation between scales: Energy flows downwards (in the spatial scale of sizes) and information flows upwards, since bigger systems have more energy and smaller systems have more information.

As such the different flows of energy and information also explain the laws of evolution (genetics codes larger systems and not the other way around as Lamarck thought), and thermodynamics (the energy of statistical molecules cannot be fully used without loss of heat, which increases entropy in the upper scale).

Those 2 different arrows of energy and information in turn define how a certain species will perform its different åctions, *as it will obtain its information from lower planes in size (but higher in information), so we get our light information from small light quanta, and our structural energy from amino acids and fat molecules; while motion will be obtained from fields of larger systems (so we move through the equipotential plane of gravitation of mother earth).*

**The flows of energy and information between scales are asymmetric: Laws of thermodynamics and evolution.**

This difference of quantity of energy and information between the larger and smaller planes of the Universe, is the origin of the non-commutative arrows of energy and information, that we call the laws of thermodynamics and the laws of evolution:

Planes of space that structure cellular/atomic, individual/organic and social/cosmic scales which synchronize its cycles in inverse fashion to its size.

So the informative, genetic, smaller faster plane codes the larger planes, which transfer back energy to the lower planes (thermodynamic laws: energy can be transferred fully downwards to the molecular space in the form of heat, but heat cannot be transferred fully upwards as energy, and the inverse law of information: smaller systems can code fully with their information upper layers as in genetics, but upper layers cannot transfer its form downwards fully – there is no Lamarckian evolution).

This structure thus gives birth to the specific åctions of a being, which are transfers of energy and information among scales limited by the laws of evolution and thermodynamics.

It essentially means that energy will flow downwards.

And so bigger systems will control lower systems by controlling their energy:

Cells will depend on the digestive systems to feed. While smaller systems will control upper systems by forming them: cells will code genetically upper systems.

The same happens in physical systems where atoms and molecules code the forms of upper systems, from crystals to geological cycles, but they are trapped by the larger gravitational and electromagnetic fields created by the cosmic bodies.

Thus evolution is an arrow of time from downwards to upward systems and energy is an arrow of time from upwards to downwards systems, and those 2 ‘laws’ structure the flows of energy and information of the Universe.

Thus when we consider any system we shall study its relationship with lower and upper planes of existence according to those laws.

*And we will call also those 2 different directions, using the ‘Logarithmic size scale’ (opposite in numbers to that of the previous graph, from Force, to Cosmos), t*he quantum, ∆-1 and ∆+1 gravitational arrows of ∆ST, scalar space-time.

As we move upwards in size, we fully transfer form-information, but loose energy-motion, as we move downwards we fully transfer energy-motion but loose information.

Thus evolutionary and thermodynamic laws, and its exchanges of information and energy are a consequence of the metric of the 5th dimension, which makes smaller systems to process more information than larger ones, even though the product of both remain co-invariant: Se x Tƒ =∆i.

This could be stated in the following manner, when considering exchanges of energy and information across multiple scales:

‘*The total energy obtained from upper planes by an individual system is roughly equivalent to the information it obtains from lower planes, and both are mixed in the ∆-plane by its bodies and waves to reproduce the system: ∑ (Tƒ<≈>Sp).*

This equation which the reader will notice is inverse to the equation we use often to explain the structure of an organism in simpler energy cells and complex networks of information (particle/heads), is an essential equation for all informative processes of reproduction of bodies and waves

Accordingly, the flows of genetic information and energy obtained from bigger preys, is used by biological systems to produce ‘radiations of cells and individual systems’ in the ∆-plane. So we talk of a combination of 3 åctions:

*∆Ae(∆-2): Feeding < ≈∆Ai (Reproduction)≈< ∆Ao(∆-1) Genetic Information*

In that regard, any system of the Universe will establish a series of åctions related to the creation, reproduction and social evolution through form, information; and åctions related to the creation, absorption and use of energy and motion, *ruled by the asymmetry of both arrows of past-energy vs. future-information, paradoxically inverse to the size and scale of the system.*

If we differentiate åctions related to ‘external energy and information’ (Aa: motion and acceleration, Ao, sensorial perception), from ‘internal energy and information’), the duality of Thermodynamics vs. Evolution will determine that:

Aa(∆±4)

The system will absorb energy from the largest field – in the human case the gravitational field of the Earth.

Ao (∆±3)

And it will absorb information from the smallest field – in the human case the light-quanta of the stars.

And again, in its search for structural energy for its body, it will obtain that energy from the ecosystem, often hunting larger preys (parasitism, feeding on big plants, carnivorous feeding on bigger slower herbivorous).

While the information that constructs the organic system comes from genetic, molecular forms in the ∆-1/2 cellular scales.

While the Universe does show certain flexibility in all its laws those rules are general to establish the relationships between the individual system we analyse and its lower and upper scales, both in physical and biological systems.

What this means is also obvious, as it sets *limits to the whole existence of the Universe.*

**How both Sp>Tƒ scales balance each other. Constant speed, accelerations and decelerations. The life-death cycle of motion.**

To fully grasp those inter-åctions between planes of existence, it is needed to differentiate the 3 main systems of the Universe, in relationship to the human ∆-observer:

Max. Tƒ: Sociological Systems, closer to humans, which have therefore maximal form and minimal motion. And must be interpreted in terms of ‘formal changes’

S=T: Biological Systems, more distanced, in which form and motion play roles which can be studied in harmony.

Max. S: Physical systems in which motion is maximal and even *form can be interpreted in terms of rotary motion, the simplest π-clocks of time.*

We are not generally speaking use sociological systems and its equations, treated in a web of its own as it would be extremely shocking to some, given the anthropomorphism of our world, but do compare constantly physical and biological differences between motion, which is mainly external in physical systems and internal motion in biological systems.

All this said, we can consider different type of motions in physical systems, which correspond to the symmetry of its 3 ages: acceleration-steady state-deceleration.

But, there is also the inverse equation of motion, * *by virtue of the previous ‘duality’ of S∆-thermodynamic scales vs. Tƒ, Temporal Scales, which gives birth to a deceleration < steady state > Accelerated movement, depending on the origin of the initial motion in an upper ‘∆-plane’ that transfers motion to the lower ∆-plane, or in a lower ∆-plane that dies and transfers motion to the upper ∆-plane. Thus we observe a first diversification of the pattern of motions depending on which Si or Tƒ scale are we observing:

*Energy motion transferred from a lower ∆-plane through a process of death=disorder.*

Let us consider that the lower ∆-plane ‘dies’, E=Mc², producing energy which is converted into motion in the upper ∆-plane. Then the world cycle of such motion is:

∆-1,-2>∆:* Acceleration*≈* seminal birth* of the motion, which *transfers energy in a process of death from a lower scale to a bigger scale with loss of form in the motion (thermodynamic chaotic arrow)*

*Young age of motion* ≈ entropic arrow in a single ∆-scale: Expansion in space, which ‘integrates’ the energy into lower speed, through decelerations

*Steady State* ≈ mature age of motion with a similar speed till the motion stops and attractive forces bring.

* Implosive motion* back to an accelerated vortex, which will reverse entropy into form.

The two arrows are thus compensated, with a dual ‘movement’, which first expands into space the motion, dissolving its order upwards into larger scales, most likely through electromagnetic radiation-energy, and then reaches a steady state of stillness, when gravitational, informative motions bring back the form and increase its order through an accelerated gravitational vortex.

*Thus this dual motion, which happens as a motion in time (3 ages), in space (expansive entropy<steady state> implosive rotary motion) and through 3 planes (big bang death, balanced motion in the ∆-plane, collapse back through gravitation), compensates both arrows.*

It is thus necessary to consider always the whole world cycle of a motion to see how finally all the arrows balance, despite being inverse, and have no balance if we choose a single arrow. We could also express this concept in terms of conservation principles:

*‘Motions in a single planes of space-time conserve its momentum and follow the conservation principles of lineal and cyclical inertia; motions between planes of existence are either decelerated motions or accelerated motions, as the imbalance between lineal and cyclical form, increases either the entropic, expansive, decelerating motion of the system, (electromagnetic forces, death processes which start with acceleration and then after the initial big-bang decelerate to an expanded stillness) or the informative, implosive, accelerated motion of rotary motions (which start as an accelerated Vo x Ro =K, vortex, but then at the end, becomes decelerated into the perceptive zero-point).*

*So death motions and informative motions are inverse: a death motion is born in accelerated, explosive, inflationary state, and then decelerates as it expands in space, looses temperature-energy-momentum and finally occupies a space with no motion.*

Informative motions are however accelerated rotational motions which passed the ‘event horizon’ of inner perception quiet down for the zero point, the eye of the hurricane, the black hole, the sensorial point to perceive, and at that point they ‘split’ into pure stillness (mapping and a gauging of information) and pure speed (perpendicular deflection into a lineal flow).

Now this process when considered in life systems, can be interpreted in the long time processes of evolution as the 3 ages of life after seminal birth, with its accelerated, paligenesis that make the fetus emerge into the ∆-plane where it will go through 3 ages and then die into a split between the information/memories that will remain of the system and the energetic cells that will be consumed back into the ∆-2 plane.

It follows that since only motion within the same plane is steady state, inertial motion, all scalar vortices belonging to other planes different to the human plane (both charges and masses) will be perceived as accelerated vortices that increase the energy of the system (gravitational motions of the upper ∆+2,3,4 planes of the planet, galaxy and cosmos), and vice versa, decelerated vortices that collapse the energy into information (quantum collapse of an electromagnetic wave into a dense photon that occupies a static place in the electronic nebulae around the atom). And this duality of gravitational acceleration vs. informative quantum collapse, is due to the inversion of the Si thermodynamic and Tƒ, evolutionary, informative scales.

We thus complete the relativity concept that ‘gravitation’ is a deformation of space into cyclical time and the principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration, giving a scalar why; and vice versa, explain the collapse of quantum waves into particles, which reach a degree of higher stillness in the electron nebulae, that does NOT as Bohr found to its surprise, collapse further accelerating and radiating in the atom, since that is the informative arrow of the Universe.

*So in the next stage of reality, beyond this ∆-plane of existence that we do not perceive, which we shall call, the ∆±4 Plane, of pure forces of motion, ‘gravitational forces’, ∆-4, and pure form without motion, ‘cosmic black holes’ or ∆±4, the rest of realities are ‘messed up’. Their motions have some form and their forms have some motion. And so they are all Ø-species. And we call them ‘waves and bodies’.*

To facilitate a first introduction to the subject, and to better study the synchronicities and common isomorphisms of all those scales, we also treat them all together as a ‘compact’, from where to deduce its general metric laws, ∆±4=Se x Tƒ, which tell us that ‘systems that diminish in size, increase its time cycles and information processing’ and vice versa, remaining invariant in its total Se X Tƒ=EXISTENTIAL FORCE.* The fundamental parameter that defines survival and existence in the Universe.*

This site is dedicated to make available that formalism to a wider audience, given the ideal structure of the web, which allows through hyperlinks to display all the information of all sciences, in increasing levels of complexity, till reaching the details of every species of the Universe. Paraphrasing Einstein, if ∆ST (planes-social scales and space-time dimensions, origin of the ‘isomorphisms’ of all scientific species studied by General Systems Sciences) are the ‘thoughts of God’, its species, which are varieties of ∆ST isomorphisms are its details.

We can thus make a simpler analysis, by ‘compacting’ those dimensions in a classic manner, considering the 3 dimensions of space, then a single dimension of ‘absolute’ time from the remote past to the final future (the 4 classic dimension of lineal time as duration), and then the whole ‘hierarchical’ dimensions of relative size and social organization, from the smallest particle to the biggest galaxy and beyond, the ‘5th dimension’ of scalar space-time.

**Further more**

We will study the different planes of Existence in great detail in the general upper line of the web:

*– i Plane: Individual Self**– ∆+1 Plane: Social Scales**– ∆-1 Plane: Cellular Atoms**– ∆+2 Plane: World**– ∆-2 Plane: Energy Quanta**-∆+3 Plane: Cosmos**-∆-3 Plane: Bits of Information**-∆-4 Plane: Force**-|+4 Plane: Universe*

And its interaction with the relative ∆-plane of each species, in the study of its åctions:

And the 9 ∆-scales with its detailed scientific analysis of its 10 isomorphisms in the lower line, connection ∆ST and classic science.

**A perfectly structured, architectonical Universe.**

The invariant equation or ‘metric of the 5th dimension’ is thus the departing point of the formalism of General Systems Sciences which describes wholes made of parts extended through several plane of relative time speed of information or I-scales of the 5th dimension.

Its main advance over previous simpler models is to incorporate fully the laws of the 5th dimension of space-time, formed by different scales of reality which accelerate the speed of its ‘temporal clocks of information’, under a universal vortex law: Se x Tƒ=∆. That is the smaller the vortex-clock, charge or mass that regulates the information of the being, the faster in time it turns, processing information with its digital clocks: So informative heads run faster clock cycles, with spherical topologies and bodies and limbs run shorter ones, yet they are bigger in space.

In the graph, we resume those 3 components in the main scales of the 5th dimension of space-time across which the systems of the Universe organize its complex, open complementary systems made of ‘informative particles/heads’ and energetic fields/bodies’ that transfer energy and information among themselves, and with its macrocosmic society and microcosmic cellular world.

As all systems extend across 3 ±∆ scales of different space size and different time speed or ‘fractal space-time’. The study of such complex organic, Fractal Universe is the realm of systems sciences.

**The symmetries of the 3 geometries in time and scales**

Now the next ‘complex’ course of 2-manifold isomorphisms deals with the way in which those 3 geometries interplay not ONLY IN SPACE, creating topological organisms, but in time that is not as static bidimensional geometries but as moving geometries, and specially in scales, that is between scales in which as we move through the geometry, *both the speed of time and the quantity or population of space-quanta which determines the size of the space network change.*

*We have in that regard, *studied the 3 topologies of 2-manifolds as they are symmetrically positioned and invaginated in the construction of 4D beings.

But it is also important to understand the 2-manifold assemblies along the time derivative of the function of existence (3 ages) and along the scalar integration and derivation, or opposite U+∆ larger, and ∆+∆ complex U planes of reality.

Now since information travels from lower scales to upper scales and motion from upper to lower, a better geometric representation of the planes of existence would be a bell curve, whereas the upper scales are perceived from the lower scales as curving inwards into lesser points, the ‘wholes’ and lower scales will show a ‘toroid’ expansion as the number of quanta of information increases.

Thus in 5D scales the 3 bidimensional varieties act as follow: ∆Se x -∆Tƒ-> elliptic, curved, integrative geometry, (perception of upper scales), Se ≈ Tƒ (single plane perception: hyperbolic/planar geometry), -Se x∆ Tƒ (perception of lower scales with more informative quanta: toroid, fractal, ‘derivative’ geometry) :

Thus as we move towards light speed in the larger scale of space-speeds of the cosmological world our ‘space-time’ parameter suffer the consequences of the metric of the 5^{th} dimension and the Non-Euclidean elliptic geometry from the human perspective, giving birth to the Lorentz transformation paradoxes and the curved geometry (from the human perspective):

As we are ‘travelling towards the higher scale of size-energy and lesser information’. Thus according to those 5D Metric, ∆ Se x -∆ Tƒ = C we experience a slow down of the clocks of time (T->O) as Se size-speed increase.

**III. STIENTIFIC PLANES**

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those i±1 scales.

The game departs from the perfect, ideal immortal scales of atomic physics into the functions and organs, territories and life-death cycles of less ‘perfect’ species, of higher scales, a fact which proves that ultimately the game is not about mathematical abstractions but about survival and life.

**Unification of Stiences. S****ocial order of numbers: arrow of WHOLES – future of the 5th dimension.**

Why there is an order in numbers? We are asking deeper than current mathematical formalism, which despite claims of closed, absolute proof, actually describes as most sciences do the ‘how’ of the process. That is, it does not inquire why 2 comes after one – an intuition of the mind not explained, which must therefore be an ‘a priori’ hence, a T.Œ property of numbers.

This must be clear to the reader. When we find intuitive, pure abstract or isomorphic laws of great generality they must be considered a ‘direct’ reflection of T.Œ, the game of existence of 5D space-times beings. And as such must be the sequential order of numbers.

Indeed, we hold a self-evident truth that all ‘linguistic, mathematical or verbal forms’ are a reflection of the Universe, and its T.œ structure, so are numbers. Our methods of proof in the ‘linguistic method’ are therefore both experimental and logic, self-consistent (->Epistemology). This includes proofs in mathematics – a complete deviation from the classic standard, already advanced by Lobachevski in his original book on Non-E mathematics, which he said should be proved or disproved as real by experimental evidence.

Thus this question, which has been formalised within the ‘baroque, metalinguistic 3rd age of mathematics’structure of mathematics itself, from the times of Euclid through those of Dedekind and Weiertrass in the modern times, has an ‘experimental’ simple cause, in the parallelism between numerical order and temporal 5D order (mathematics in relational space-time, is an experimental science that studies the ultimate isomorphic laws of all species). Namely that a ‘whole’ must come ‘after’ the parts exist, and since a ‘whole’ is a larger number of ‘infinitesimal parts’, social, bigger numbers come after smaller ones.

Hence the order of Natural Numbers, which are social numbers is the same order than bigger wholes, made of ‘smaller numerical parts’.

Indeed, in the graph we can see the 5th dimension natural order of parts into wholes which has an arrow of growth.

5D planes are therefore the basis of 2 of the 3 branches of mathematics, sequential algebra and Analysis, while geometry is related to the motions and actions in space-time within a single plane of existence. Nothing else is needed to describe the Universe.

Let us then consider in this and related posts the essential features of existential algebra. We will study on the posts under the label of ‘i-mathematics’ the proper translation and justification of the laws of algebra, within relational space-time. In this post we shall study the fundamental equation of existential algebra and the Universe at large – the Fractal Generator of the Universe. To that aim we must first introduce the structure of the Universe and then represent it with the symbols of existential algebra.

Each science is the description of all the superorganisms of a similar size and form, its cells and networks, its morphological and behavioral laws. Scientific knowledge is the information that humanity has about all those super-organisms. To differentiate those forms we use an index, ‘I:∆±4’, that measures the relative scale, self-centered in the human being, we perceive, whose volume of temporal energy and spatial information is similar by virtue of 5D metric (ST=K), whose entropic limits ±¡ are all those regions of reality we no longer perceive. Thus:

∆=-¡<-4: It is the scale of quantum potential fields of space/time, likely related to gravitation, invisible to us but perceived through its accelerated motion.

∆=-4 It is the scale of electromagnetic forces, the minimal perceived forms, which are composed of an informative particle, or photon and an energetic flow or electromagnetic wave.

∆=-3: It is the scale of atomic particles, composed of electronic space and informative quarks. The basic science of those 3 scales is Physics.

∆=-2: It is the scale from molecules to cellular systems, studied by chemical sciences.

∆=-1: It is the scale of cellular, living systems, studied by biological sciences.

∆=0: Our i-ndividual I-centered scale

∆=+1: It is the planetary scale and its natural and historic ecosystems, studied by Geology, Ecology, Economic, History and Theology.

∆=+2: It is the scale of stars.

∆=+3. Galactic systems, made of stars and black holes.

∆=+4: It is the scale of Universes made of galaxies.

∆=+1>4: It is the scale of the hyper-Universe made of Universes, which

Those 3 bigger scales are studied by Astronomy.

I=∆: Thus is the infinity of Fractal Space-Time scalesand Systems Theory study the homologous laws of all scales and its main sciences. Indeed, all systems of energy and information including the Universe follow the same space-time isomorphic laws of existence.

# ∆ºFORMAL SCIENCES

If we had to define God, the mind of that Universe, we would say that God is *the logic Game of *__Existence__* and Extinction* of all super-organisms. So bio-logic and mathematical spatial languages define it.

So let us resume what truly would be an explanation of ALL.

- The syntax of the spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages we use to explain reality.
- And the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made, the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific equivalents: the energy stored in the space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of those time cycles.

They are the simplest elements and process of reality that all systems of Nature share and hence its properties are carried by all entities of reality.

Now we shall solve those 2 necessary elements for any T.Œ which goes beyond a single science or religion, defining a ‘Fractal Generator’, a logic equation which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought), and so it can unify the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

But further on as this grammar is a ternary logic structure, repeated in scales its immediate consequence is that the Universe must have only 3 elements, and a scalar repetitive structures of parts and wholes.

Those elements will turn to be ‘Spe: spatial energy’, Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions described by verbs of mathematical operandi:

Spe (space)Tiƒ (Time): red-energyBlue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function. Informative subjectEnergy object. Height-informative pole, length, energy point, width-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so again knowledge languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ and interative combinations:

Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm: sentence, paragraph, narrative; point->line->plane->volume and so on.

The elements of a T.Œ, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe those realities in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ (mathematical physics and chemistry, tho which biology ads verbal evolution, arts substitute the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and so on) become just a routine:

As we simply must fill the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined. Thus T.Œ will not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

**The 3 spatial Postulates and its dimensions; the 2 i-logic postulates and its correspondence with ∆lanes.**

*We can consider in another way those 5 Postulates/Axioms of ¬E as image of the 5 Dimensions and as symmetries of time and space ages/topologies: *

-The first postulate defines the fractal point from an objective outside perspective as a 1-dimensional form (which often is seen as a dot in lineal motion); so it is the first space-time dimension; the second postulate is a 2D-manifold wave; the 3rd is a 3D physiological network, and defines the super organism. But the i-logic of them is given by the 4th postulate of congruence and the 5th of minds.

*-In the duality of @ (mind-being) vs. Non-A (outside ∞ entropic Universe), the being is ordered by the mind (5D) and the outside world of all other forms and scales is the 4D.*

So the fifth postulate give us the internal mind view, as a ð-point with an inner world, and as such represents the point as mind, the fifth dimensions, and the fourth sees the point as a simple one-dimensional ‘dot’ of an immense entropic reality, to which it will be connected in parallel, ordered fashion or in perpendicular darwinian, entropic one.

The fourth postulate thus webs the rules of logic engagement of parts, in a more complex fashion, giving us all the choices and variations of similarity and perpendicularity that defines the parallel social evolution into collective minds or the entropic perpendicular darwinian destruction of systems by rival systems.

It is then in the 3 first postulates, where we find the knots and bolts of the present super organism and its 1,2,3 |-lineal limbs/potentials, Ø-body-wave fields and O-particle/heads.

Those simpler spatial postulates of i-logic ‘vital geometry’ expand both the dimensions of the point, which has always at least 1 dimension (first postulate) (or the 5 five dimensions of the whole ‘capped’ by the mind – 5 postulate); and its present super organisms, defining 2-manifold bidimensional waves of communication (2nd postulate):

The second postulate studies how motion and communication happens through those potentials in motion; and the result is the construction of networks of ‘actions and waves’ – the fourth postulate which describes the whole as a physiological system of 3 fractal networks, the new definition of a plane, which is now unlike in classic geometry defined by ‘3 lines=network waves’, the entropic, ‘digestive/territorial’, reproductive ‘blood/economic’ and informative ‘nervous/political’ systems, if we were to use for a change, the model of social super organisms both at individual human and collective, historic level.

And so *the 5 postulates, the 3 of space, the 2 of logic sequential time are a good introduction to the next ‘great advance of ∆@s≈t, more detached of the classic languages, as it will include them all, the existential algebra of the generator equation.*

**MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS – THE LANGUAGE OF SCALES IN TIME AND SPACE**

*The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Contrary to intuition, Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales (and mostly time), as they ‘reduce’ the information into a synoptic ‘point-singularity’ the tangent that expresses tendencies in the flow of time of the function; while integrals are concerned mostly with the sum of its lower parts in space, as they expand the ‘base’ of analysis but reduce the different(ial) added information of the whole. A fascinating subject being how a ‘simple parameter data – that enclosed in a derivative or a fourier transformation SUFFICES to expand and remodel the whole system. *

*The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of maths, without mathematicians and physicists understand why. *

Analysis is the study of events happening *in transitions between ∆-scales, either as infinitesimal parts come together into ‘integral wholes’ in space (integral functions), or as we extract from a system the information about its higher wholes, synoptically encoded in its inverse derivative functions.*

So integrals work mostly on space, giving us therefore information about lower 5D scales and derivatives mostly on time, giving us information about parameters of the whole (but as both are symmetric, this general rule does not apply.

**Integrals in topology.**

As the Universe is a kaleidoscopic mirror of symmetries between all its elements, this dominant of analysis on ∆-scaling must ad also the use of analysis on a single plane, in fact the most common, whereas the *essential consideration is the ∆§ocial decametric and e-π ternary scaling, with minimal distortion (which happens in the Lorentzian limits between scales). *

**The fourier transform and harmonic functions.**

It is also needed to consider in processes of emergence *in time, that is in the creation of worldcycles of super organisms, sum of its 3±i actions, another key set of equations also applied in the resonance processes of emergence, namely those cyclical trigonometrical functions which better express the ‘cumulative’ process of repetition into a single final continuous whole.*

And all this could be resumed in a simple definition:

The Fourier transform takes a time series or a ‘whole’ function of continuous time, and maps it into a series of discontinuous frequency spectrum. That is, it takes a function from the time domain into the frequency domain; it is a decomposition of a function into sinusoids of different frequencies, which corresponds to the ‘discrete actions=arrows’ performed with different frequencies by the Γœ system.

And vice versa each **fourier transform** used for harmonic analysis has a corresponding inverse transform that can be used for synthesis. So it is a mathematical **tool of ðime** akin to integral/derivative **analysis for ∆§scales** or **Hamiltonian/Lagrangian** functions **for Spatial, Energy,** single, present scales and **frames of reference **and its distortions of the same single Universe** for O-mind ****views; **reason why ‘Hamiltonians≈Lagrangians, frames of reference, fourier, harmonic functions and integral/derivatives are absolutely all-pervading equations in all branches, as they are the key functions for the ∆•st four elements of all realities, an astounding ‘magic’ fact (: which platonic gurus who know nothing about first principles have always wondered about (customary quip:)

Finally an important and necessary concept about ∆§caling are the Lorentz Transforms and the duality between lineal and curved functions, which properly translated *have applications to all scales reason why it has spur given the love of all things 4D and our tribal idols of physics 🙂 an astounding rain of ‘magic’ isomorphic equations between sciences, but it comes to this:*

The key distinction on 5D motions are motions restricted to growth in a single scale (∆§ well-behaved scaling) versus ∆±i ‘distorted emerging and dissolution, which does change the form of the system, as *it represents a discontinuity in which either information accelerates and size shrinks establishing new constants of space-time (downwards) or vice versa, information thins and space grows.*

So those regions were not properly ‘analyzed’ *as *for very long it was for ∫∂, necessary the ‘continuity’ without such distortions of the function studied, and so analysis was restricted to ∆(±1 – 0) intervals and ‘broke’ when jumping two scales as in processes of entropy (death-feeding). But with improved approximation techniques, functionals and operators (which assume a whole scale of ∞ parts as a function of functions in the operator of the larger scale) and renormalisation in double and triple integrals and derivatives by praxis, *without understanding the scalar theory behind it, *this hurdle today…

And it has always amused me that humans can get so far in all disciplines by trial and error, when a ‘little bit of thought on first principles’ could make thinks much easier. It seems though-thought beings are scarce in our species and highly disregarded, as the site’§ight§how (allow me, a bit of cacophony and repetition the trade mark of this blog and the Universe 🙂 As usual I shall also repeat, I welcome comments, and offers of serious help from specialists and Universities, since nothing would make me happier than unloading tons of now-confusing analysis not only of analysis, before I get another health crisis and all goes to waste in the eternal entropic arrow of two derivatives, aka death.

P**LANES AS NETWORKS IN NON-Æ GEOMETRY**

The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1^{st} postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks. A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.

In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic. It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.

Thus in this 2^{nd} lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.

What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.

Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.

What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.

This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.

What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4^{th} paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe. However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.

Thus, the 4^{th} paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3^{rd }paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4^{th} paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate

is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 postulates to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross. This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, hyperbolic topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive toroid, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.

Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2^{nd} postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (4th postulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 3rd postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum:

In the graph the vital, organic geometry and its postulates that structure formally the time§paœrganisms of reality. In this post we shall not reach that degree of formality studied in our posts on non-AE maths and fractal points but use a simpler analysis of it, concentrating in the 3rd postulate: how fractal entropy, energy and information networks evolve systems into exi=st¡ence organisms, studied by a different stience for each plane of the 4th-5th organic dimensions.

**The organic, metaphysical view. **

Of the 3 scales of reality the ¡-1 scale is perceived as a sum of non-euclidean points, which is achieved when the ‘finitesimal’ becomes an indistinguishable point on the ‘whole’, which appears then as a continuum.

This is the most reductionist process that damps the ‘vital properties’ of the points as a ‘mass’ from the larger view of the systems.

Unfortunately it is the commonly used procedure in current Euclidean science of points with no parts – which is shameful, specially in Social Sciences and economics, where humans are tagged with ‘prices’, as ‘objects’ of a wholesale process of reduction of ‘human heads’ to economical points of ‘credit’ and ‘profit equations’, a fact which 5D sciences thoroughly rejects as we shall see on the analysis of U+1 eco(nomic)systems.

And yet, that is how the Universe works, specially when the social scientists does not ‘operate’ on its structure to enhance the power of individual human points.

As Shakespeare put it we are are gods from the n+1 scale, we are ‘buffoons’, indistinguishable points from the n-1 scale. And we are organisms, points with parts, To-minds/heads in our normal scale.

The unequal relationship the points of those 3 planes of existence establish, will give birth to very different (a)symmetries…**.**

What is the Universe? A 5D Game of Non-Euclidean Points of view.

The mathematical unit of the complex universe is the Œ-fractal point, better defined as a Non-Euclidean knot of infinite cyclical parallels f energy and information that converge into the Œ-point.

Ot-points are both points of information, with form, fractal points, non-Euclidean points made of 3 bidimensional geometries. And they are Energetic, points with ‘momentum’, with motion, Œ-points pushed by the E-nergy or E-ntropy motions behind them.

Hence the importance of ‘momentum’ in physics, given the fact that we do NOT see a point without motion (though we can extract mathematical properties from it). So by definition we do prefer in physics, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian canonical analysis, which uses momentums rather than ‘pure scalar’ masses (Newtonian formalism), in the description of ‘physics of motion’; which for this reason is also along bidimensional ‘foliated’ analysis (fluids, General Relativity, Hamiltonian version), and the duality of finitesimals (point-particles, undistinguishable Bose statistics) vs. Wholes, 3 ever pervading ‘realities’ of physical systems.

If we add the understanding of the two asymmetric arrows of 5D geometries (information moving upwards, energy downwards) we have the fundamental elements that we shall use to ‘explain’ properly and correct some of the gruesome errors of the physical Universe.

Thus the units of reality are dimensional points. And all Realities are constructed with them.

This is what we are. Points, which grow in size as we come closer to them, and grow even larger as we enter the region of the ego, till reaching the ultimate essence of it.

The zero point, the fractal point, the Non-Euclidean point, the first postulate of existence, the I…

The Universe is a mathematical, i-logic game of Non-Euclidean points of view that web waves of exi-stence, communicating, cyclically forming wholes that decay back into parts in the process of death, cycling in time and space.

And the understanding of the Is and its i-logic and Non-Euclidean mathematical rules of existence is the game we all play and each mind reflects with a language.

Aristotle was perhaps the man who better understood the Universe as a sum of non-Euclidean points of view, and after him Leibniz, who said that ‘we must regard each point as a Universe in itself’ and indeed, in the fractal Universe each atom is a galaxy, an island Universe of a bigger gravitational scale, and this infinity of self-similar games that are played in different scales is what we talk about, which is resumed in the widening i-logic of those i-points of view, which have internal parts, which have breath unlike the simpler non-e points of view.

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5^{th} postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1^{st} postulate. The 5^{th} postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point *of view*: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.

So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points.

This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.

Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of *points of view.*

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

Non-Euclidean Points of view have perception, they have mathematical view, they have Non-Euclidean i-logic paths or structures of causality in its built-in organic systems and as such can be described as living entities.

Ok, let us be less mathematical now (-; i-logic geometry is also the geometry of the ‘i’ point, made of a line and a cycle.

The i, is thus another symbol I used instead of Œ, as it showed clearly the head-point on top of the line of energy, also for 5D scales, as it was the central i-plane of the i-ndividual. And it was the next letter after AE logic geometry, so i talked of i-logic. And it was the symbol of iteration, reproduction, the present function of immortality; and the central vowel.

So i was by far the symbol that represented it all. I did publish a few books under the name of i-man, which was the name i signed on my 20s when i still thought humans would care to understand…

This said for future, if any, human or robot soul seeks on whatever is left of my deposits of knowledge, now that Im trying to pour on the web a meaningful part of 5D science, i scrapped all those meanings and use i only for the action of iteration. Yet it might appear often specially graphs as the scales of the 5th dimension n±1=i±1) and the symbol of information (now o for observer and cyclical form, and To)

I realise this plurality of i-meanings confused a lot people, which do have an A-ristotelian mind so each ‘entity’ is one-dimensional in its meanings.

Still that I of multiple meanings is the max. I-ndividual scale of each complementary system of the Universe.

I, is in the generator equation, E < => I, the 3rd phase of existence of any event, when all energy dies and information perceives in the verge of death of the flow of existence, exi, <=>, shared between the poles.

I is when you squeeze the food energy in your mouth and as it dies, its informative waves becomes united into a set of perception in your mind

I is that simplex moment in which the focus appears in the image and Still it projects its form in the screen.

I and the sum of Is in time and space brings from the point of each non Euclidean being its ultimate experience as being, as perceiving, as gauging, as mapping, as being intelligent, to be in the I state of solid Stillness, knowing, is to be I, then is…

…the function of maximal information, the i=eye, ego, self-center, dominant mind of each non Euclidean point.

I is the ego function, the Still mind of the perceiver who orders with his future actions in which its thought would be imprinted in the Universe.

The mind that creates, I and the vision it creates, the subjective vision of the black hole parasite, of the nervous system of the pure mind calculating how to imprint itself in the Universal game…

The I is the first postulate of the non-Euclidean, illogic geometry of all systems. There are in any science certain point systems of which we do not know more in the verge of our existential space time membrane, but each point with seemingly remote or small seems to have no content is in fact a set, with sub sets and relative infinities, wholes that become smaller than its cellular parts, when we get all the information of those parts.

All beings are points which are a world in themselves, and so the point world is the unite of it all. Externally it might be always reduced to a mere point of a bigger field, in actions of collective experiences, but internally it feels itself so important.

Yes even the ant feels itself important as an ant.

And we might be seen as ants by systems of national power that control us.

Any real system will have ONLY 3 dimensions of space, specular to the dimensions of time-motion, hence 3 space-time dimensions, to become a fractal island-universe and then the 4th dimension will be that of the mind of the whole, which sees it as a ‘o-point’ or finitesimal of the next super organism, world or island-universe in which the being or mind exists.

So there are 3 dimensions of space-time in each plane. A 4th pure dimension of the mind as a whole, or o-point of the next scale, and then the 5th dimension will be that whole+mind already performing cyclical space-time distance/motions on the larger “§upœrganism” (sorry i love to use new words, and this is how i normally write SuperOrganism, whereas § are the spatial scales, ∆±1 around the o-point and since all organisms are made of energy and form, information, œ is a better way to call a super organism. and to make it shorter, pœr instead of per or, for the ‘reader’ to go back and forth and read twice. In any case this is a whole new concept stretched further than the classic one, and that is the ultimate reason I introduce new words.)

** ∆±4:**** PHYSICAL PLANES OF 5D**

The scales of the 5th dimension are more evident in physics that in any other science as we do not limit our inquire as in biology and sociology to an ∆±1 single super organism and its 3 scales (cells, organisms, ecosystems; individuals, nations, human species). So the fact that physicists have not been able to clarify its concepts of time, space, wave, particle, field, energy, information etc. beyond its mathematics of continuous space-time makes the whole field a bit confusing. Anthropomorphism and the incapacity to understand the distortions of observers and observables also provokes problems of interpretation.

Difficulty then arises from the fact that Astrophysics is a ‘mathematical-only’ theory with special emphasis in a single space-time continuum analysis of the cosmos and a human, abstract point of view implicit in Relativity, where the electronic=human eye rod of space-time measure, light is considered NOT only what it is, the rod of measure of the space-time of this galaxy, but of the entire Universe.

Again we shall always find the same problem with ‘humans’, to convert his ‘mind point of view’ into a Universal mind point of view, without being aware of the limits of mind-information embedded in the equation of any monadic mind:

O-point (infinitesimal) x ∞ Universe of time-space moving cycles = Still reduced linguistic mapping

Which the O-point of view confuses with the absolute Universe. Consider this image, the first ‘scientist’ mapping of the Universe. At the time nebulae were considered stars, so the Milky way was all the UNIVERSE. And of course, the sun was in its center:

Now, science is objective and so the proper definition is that of Schopenhauer: ‘man is a mush covering a lost rock in a corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about us’.

Now this is what we so far can see and talk around us:

It is not even worthy to try to point out the sun in the network of ‘galaxies’ of that piece of cosmos, whose 13 billion horizon is as far as light comes to us… 5D physics would say that the ∆4, cosmic scale of 1011 galaxies, form a new ∆-scale (∆5), curiously enough with the same 1011 constant of order between ∆-planes of the 5th dimension. So this is all we know-know. There is an ∆4 scale we perceive which MIGHT BE a relative, cell or atom or quanta of the larger whole (perspective of the ∆n>4 scale).

And depending what it ‘is’, it might have been born in one or other way. In the same image we see that the Universe might be modeled as an organism of network cells, as the galaxy can be modeled ‘best’ as a cell, with DNA-black holes in its center, where stars can be modeled as Neutrons that die in an inverse beta-decay called ‘supernovae’ producing a mass of ‘neutrino’ energy, which curiously takes away the same proportion of matter than neutrinos take from neutron-beta decay.

This is the MOST likely relative fractal symmetry on the 5th dimension, which is NOT identical but as all fractals self-similar. Now in this organic vision we can FIT astrophysics and mathematics, as we can fit mathematics in BIOLOGY, but as we do NOT start explaining the organism of the cell WITH MATHEMATICS only, as we are more interested into an analytic, synthetic view, 5D physics, does NOT START with equations. It puts them, as Biologists do, when it seems fit to do so. Or when we are interested in details or want to quantify data.

This is needed BECAUSE OF the uncertainty of studying a Universe of which we only perceive a 4%, due to the uncertainty of its vast size and distance from our point of view in terms of scales of the 5th dimension so this implies:

1) The difficulty on translating the exact mathematical, spatial equations of astrophysics into meaningful statements UNLESS we use homology between 5D scales we know better and laws and functions of Organic and temporal, causal nature.

2) And so we shall do this despite the natural opposition to an organic interpretation of the Universe by the present practitioners of the abstract, mathematical paradigm.

On the other hand 5D physics surprisingly enough give new insights in both the cosmic big-bang, General Relativity, and by applying the isomorphic laws of all scales of reality, on the likely nature of dark matter and dark energy which can guide future researchers on the field as long as they accept the broader perspective of a Theory of the Organic Everything (TŒ).

Now we cannot make it easier for the ‘dogma’ of mechanist science as T.Œ implies a change of paradigm and so we will continue the method of other posts.

This means the description of the ‘organic, multi-linguistic’ Universe, will be ‘upside down’ with respect to the analytic method of starting from the study of the minuscule mathematical parts of the Universe, its space-quanta, to build up the structures of the universal organism with a mere abstract mathematical description, which ignores completely the relationship of its organic parts in space, the sequential ages of its worldcycles of conception, birth and extinction and its relative ‘isomorphic’ scales of the 5th dimension, in which similar phenomena take place (big bang scales from the atom to the cosmos).

Instead as usual we will describe first the whole, as an interrelated Organism with 10 ‘dimensional parameters’, hence starting by:

– Defining its Fractal Generator, G, with its ternary symmetries in space, time and its fractal scales and ternary sub-systems for each scale.

– Then study the main species of the 3 co-existing planes of astrophysical systems – which in cosmology are its ∆-1 star systems, its ∆-galaxies and the ∆+1 Universe.

– And as it is quite relevant in the case of physical systems that co-exist in an isomorphic, isotropic background consider the Fractal principle, subdividing them into its 3 sub-systems at atomic level.

– Then we study its organic structure in space with its 3 canonical topologies (Sæ-energetic membrane, ExI, cyclical body-wave and To-informative particle-head), which are often similar in the 3 scales, its 3 ages in time.

– And finally focus on the central 0-points of those systems, which are the commanding black holes that control the galaxy and its cyclical space-time actions.

This is the bare bone elements of astrophysical systems, whose qualitative study we can complete with quantitative analysis of the relationships between its 10 components and 5 actions (3 scales, 3 ages, 3 organs, and 0-points’ actions), as well as its variations of species and Universal constants (ratios and social numbers between those 10 elements and 5 actions).

Thus when study those elements, we can get to any degree of detail we want, using the known ‘space-time dualities and paradoxes’, ternary symmetries of time ages and space organs, decametric social scales between ∆±1 planes, and Universal constants of actions.

Further on we can apply the ternary fractal principle, which makes possible to study any part as a whole and divide it into 3 sub-parts, 3 sub-ages, 3 sub-planes.

And spend hundreds of pages analyzing the mathematical physics involved in the analytic description of those elements.

If I were in my prime and T.Œ had at its disposal the team of top astrophysical researchers it deserves, it would be easy to write a 1000 pages masterpiece that would r=evolve the discipline as nothing it has done since the Golden Age of relativity half a century ago. Others are welcome to do it.

Since T.Œ and the 5Dimentional organic space-time structure of reality and its cyclical, fractal laws can fully describe all what exists in the cosmos, discerning also what is likely NOT to be.

But in this introductory post and present condition of health I cannot deliver that much. We thus have to chose some themes of cosmology of interest for bringing solutions and clarifying classic themes of abstract astrophysics with the new perspective of the organic paradigm.

We thus will study the following themes.

__Γ____. The generator:__

We will just enunciate the generator equation and its main sub-equations. And apply the Fractal Ternary Principle including some elements of the atomic, particle scale, clarifying:

The connection of the 3 planes of cosmology (stars, Galaxies and Cosmos) with the 3 planes of physics (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales)

Regarding the 3 Planes of Existence of physics, ∆-1: atoms, ∆-thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 cosmic plane we will study a them in some detail:

– The Unification equation between charges, the micro-vortices of time of the atomic scale and masses, the main time vortex of the 3 cosmological scales. Since it is a long seek solution impossible to obtain in a single plane of space-time, as charges and masses, electromagnetism and gravitation belong to two different scales of the 5th dimension. We will do the simplest mathematical unification and consider the themes of more complex unifications using Einstein’s EFE and Maxwell equations and other mathematical variations.

__The 3 planes of cosmology.__

Regarding the 3 planes of cosmology, the ∆-1: star plane, the ∆-galactic plane and the ∆+1 cosmological plane we will study their ‘deaths’ and creations, that is, the different big-bangs happening on the 3 scales: Novae for ∆-1 stars, quasars for ∆-galaxies and big-bang proper for the ∆+1 cosmos. The theme of analysis here will be to evaluate the data of the cosmic big bang and consider to which of the two largest big bangs of entropy correspond (galactic quasars or local universe).

__The borders between planes.__

We introduce here the borders of information (0 temperature) and space (c-speed) between the galactic plane of light space and the cosmic plane of dark energy and dark matter.

__The 3 ages of time.__

We will briefly consider the 3 ages of time of stars, which follow the canonical laws of T.Œ and the co-invariance of space and time, represented by the H-R diagram, the 3 ages of the cosmos, represented by the 3 main solutions to Einstein’s equations and the 3 ±∆ ages of the galaxy, in more detail.

__The 3 forms of space. __We will focus on the 3 forms of a galaxy, and its symmetry with the 3 families of masses on the atomic scale, to show the symmetries of scales.

We will conclude with some remarks on the infinite scales of astrophysical systems.

The next post will deal with the atom and its lower particle, quantum scales and molecular, thermodynamic scale and there we will consider more general themes of physics, with a more detailed account of the 10 isomorphisms of physical systems. And then we will deal with some themes of geology

My apologies for the bad format of those posts, its bad English and repetitions. This is an effort to make T.Œ available to future researchers, trying to order 20 years of research in the face of some health problems that limit my capacity to work in as the mood and illness changes. My only promise to the world of science is to lay down enough material by the end of 2016 for people truly interested in a Theory of Everything based in the organic, systemic paradigm, to explore all the sciences of mankind, arts and religions with the same isomorphic laws of 5D fractal space-time cycles.

Thus the easily clarified concepts of an organic Universe vs. an abstract reductionist description of it, which confronts classic Astrophysics and 5D T.Œ, is something we won’t avoid.

The reader should also understand that the organic paradigm is closer to Eastern philosophies and cultures as what he calls science is today part of the western tradition, and even if he is not aware of it, many of its ‘dogmas’ and ‘postulates’ have embedded still anthropomorphic, subjective elements of the western culture and its 3 fundamental bias – a lineal conception of time, dating back to the military, worldly profession of physicists and Abrahamic Religions, from where also a subjective view of man as the center of the Universe springs – today substituted by the dogma that we are the only sentient, intelligent, perceptive, vital species (along some animals which are being adopted of lately, as ‘closer to us’). And so he will find himself at odds with the concepts underling T.Œ, a ‘Theory of the Organic Everything’, when we deal with the organic structure of galaxies and its ages of life and the like.

So far so good, including of course the Ego paradox of all finitesimal minds that see its reality from its point of view, one frame of reference more of the infinite ones in existence. And so after that fast analysis of the superorganism of the galaxy we can now tackle many of the abstract, mathematical astrophysical ‘theories’ of astrophysicists, none of them concerned unfortunately with the true synthetic nature of the galaxy and its scales. Now of course if we were in the XXII century, none of what I am going to write about would make any sense of be of any sensible interest to future T.Œ students of the galactic superorganism, but as we are still in the dark ages, we must talk of all those idols of the tribe, Einstein, the big-bang, black holes (frozen top stars), Unification equations, etc.

**The metric equation of the fifth dimension. Spe operandi Tiƒ = Constant.**

Indeed to make things more fun and complex, reality has added one more structural feature to reality, its scalar, fractal structure in smaller parts, we shall call ‘fractal points’ that organize through networks into larger forms we shall call wholes. So there is a fourth form of change: the social evolution of groups of fractal points into larger sizes and its dissolution or ‘death’ back to its smaller parts: ∆º±1

And that is all what is needed to explain the fractal, organic Universe of ∞ ðime§pace beings in perpetual, repetitive cyclical change.

The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory ), which considers a ‘scalar ðime§pace’ Universe in which each science studies a different scale of size in §pace, and speed of ðime of the Universe, which form together a new, 5th dimension of ðime§pace, whose metric equation, S x T = C, defines two inverse arrows of ‘ðime’, entropy and information:

In graph, the 3 main scales of the 5th dimension, with its changing speeds of ðime clocks (to) and §pace (Se), which remain co-invariant: S x T = k.

Since according to Klein’s definition, “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a ðime§pace, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”

And so for a 5th scalar dimension to exist, it is required to find a co-invariant equation of §pace and ðime parameters that do not vary as we ‘move’ through it. It is then easy to prove the existence of a 5th ðime§pace dimension with a simple ‘metric equation’: S x T = C, where S is the Spatial size (Spe) of the system related to its entropy content; T is the speed of the cyclical clocks of ðime of that scale of size, which carry the information of the system in the form and frequency of those cycles. And C is the constant, which balances any ðime§pace system, making possible its existence.

The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, *all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. *

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Such systems have an organic symbiotic, feed-back nature, as smaller cellular/atomic/memetic parts store more information in its faster ðime clocks, so they code and reproduce the larger whole (particles reproduce other particles and form atoms, with quantum information; genes reproduce cells and super organisms, and individual humans reproduce memes that create social super organisms).

On the other hand the whole synchronises with its larger size-motions the whole parts, moving them together. Since there is no loss of information reproducing information from the lower to the upper scale, and no loss of entropy moving wholes synchronically. So the differences between both arrows make cells and wholes, atoms and matter, individuals and societies co-exist and synchronise and work together in an organic NOT a mechanical manner.

**Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.**

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:

- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms,

molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form. - A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a *fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.*

In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…

*In the graph, the fractal, organic networks that structure all the space-time beings of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.*

The Universe is a fractal of spatial entropy or ‘Motion’ and temporal information or ‘Form’, if we were to use the more profound terms of philosophy of science. How a fractal NOT of digital numbers but of 2 different concepts, ‘motion’ (energy, translation in space, entropy, displacement, lineal distances, etc. will be found to be self-similar terms) and dimensional ‘form’, (time cycles, clocks, information, logic form, spherical form will be synonymous) structures its repetitive actions that allow the fractal to grow and scale up and down its forms? This is the question we shall study in depth in those posts –* the self-reproductive properties of fractal organisms.*

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein.

Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.

In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of self-similar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of space-time. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.

**∆±¡ NESTED UNIVERSE; ITS PHYSICAL SCALES**

‘D@st of space-time you are, dust you shall become”

The structure of the Universe is similar to a fractal, which repeats the same ‘actions of space-time’, of ‘exchange of energy and information’, along multiple scales of reality, between beings, which are always put internally in relationship to its inner micro-cellular ∆-1 scale and its ∆+1, external world:

*The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.Knowing the scientific, experimental details of that supœrganic structure, it marvels to see it all expressed in ‘philosophical terms’ by the likes of Cheng-tzu… Buddha, Aristotle Leibniz and Schopenhauer at different moments of history of thought. *

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:

- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
- A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a *fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.*

In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…

*In the graph, the fractal, organic networks that structure all the space-time beings of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.*

The Universe is a fractal of spatial entropy or ‘Motion’ and temporal information or ‘Form’, if we were to use the more profound terms of philosophy of science. How a fractal NOT of digital numbers but of 2 different concepts, ‘motion’ (energy, translation in space, entropy, displacement, lineal distances, etc. will be found to be self-similar terms) and dimensional ‘form’, (time cycles, clocks, information, logic form, spherical form will be synonymous) structures its repetitive actions that allow the fractal to grow and scale up and down its forms? This is the question we shall study in depth in those posts –* the self-reproductive properties of fractal organisms.*

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions.

Time bends space into masses, said Einstein. Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.

In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of self-similar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of space-time. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.

*In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human ∆• pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)*

How many physical scales there are in the Universe? The answer in ∆ST is likely ∞. Though this kind of metaphysical questions can only be considered in pure metaphysical grounds. So beyond the considerations of metaphysics and the limits of description of non¬Æ logic systems with human languages, non-E maths of fractal points and non-A-ristotelian logic of 3 time arrows, we are left to consider the scales of which we are experimentally aware, even the limiting scale (dark, ‘string’ world) which we do not perceive, but can hint at and describe logically and mathematically by plugging into 5D³ what scientists have observed and constructed in a normal continuum.

As it happens this dark world scale, outside galaxies and inside the particles of atoms is today overwhelmingly described by string theory, which has a ±side to it: as it is not observable it has only been developed through exploration of mathematically consistent scenarios, which are able to ’emerge’ in our world with certain coherence. But precisely because of that freedom of thought given by the lack of experimental evidence, we have been able to develop freely the string theory unshackled of erroneous concepts of classic physics regarding dimensions, time and space, and it turned out that the result is perfectly coherent with 5D³ giving us systems with Space-open strings, and time-closed strings, with 10 dimensions, in which the fundamental symmetries are those between S-open and t-closed string and between ∆±i scales, the so called T-duality (we shall from here on call it ∆±i-duality, as ∆±i is its proper name, since it precisely refers to the fundamental fractal, scalar symmetry of ∆st: the infinitely small -i, is symmetric to the infinite large, +i). For all this we consider string theory truth, but obviously on need as all other models of streamlining and small correction and ‘choices’ departing from the laws of the scalar, fractal $paceðime Universe.

It is then when we can easily assess…

**The ∆i=±≤4 scales of physics and its errors of human interpretation.**

Now once we know the basics of ∆st the ‘naming of those scales’ are of less importance, as we shall use quantitative results of classic physics and order them as physicists do by logarithmic decametric scales, whose origin we explain in our general article of 5D³ theory. It is though fundamental to understand its ∆±i duality (T-duality in the jargon of string theory), *as it is the key ∆-duality of the Universe, and so it is the best way to name those interrelated scales as a game of russian dolls, which connect the largest and the minimal parts for all the reasons studied in the general model.*

*So those scales are when we take them loosely self-centred in the ‘humind membrain’:*

-∆±4: Dark world or String World, shown in the graph above and below the known-known galactic world subdivided by the ∆±i duality, in:

∆+i=4, above the galaxy, which becomes a fractal point of this larger scale of ‘hyper strings’ (in the most extended models of mathematical physics) and…

∆-4, which becomes the better explored world of strings, which are conforming ‘magically’ (: to almost all the laws of ∆st, which as usually will be used conceptually more than mathematically (we do NOT stop to repeat, mathematical physics done by ‘robot-like scientists’ of the mathematical method, which ignore however the concepts and meanings behind many mathematical parameters, are right.

So we hardly get into them, taking into account that most people don’t understand them anyway – what we want to do IS to use ∆st for what is worth:

- To streamline and make sense of all that ‘magic’ hidden in the ‘experimental equations’ of mathematical physics, which as mathematics is an experimental language, do apply also here.
- To select among the ‘inflationary theories of mathematics’ which as all ‘free languages of information’, not constrained by the efficient choices of the Universe and the limiting parameters of its limited motions and ternary logic, those theories which are right.
- To interpret then the experimental evidence that acts as a final check on 1 and 2. Strings thus must be related to the scanty evidence we have of that world, and this means they must be connected with elements that we hint at but are invisible to us – hence should be part of the lower dark world below light, and this is the case of neutrino physics, which happen to have a ‘weak angle’ on the string scale, which can be and seem to be by clean ‘first data’, able to move faster than c-speed, hence belonging to the ∆-4 world, (of larger space, lesser information hence v:>s/<t >c).

**∆st proofs of string, tachyon, 10D, T-duality and neutrino-light theories.**

The funny thing about string and neutrino and gravitational theories when plugged into ∆st is that all what physicists stuck in a single light space-time scale (∆-3) consider weird and wrong about their theories. Such as in a non-exxhaustive list:

-Neutrinos faster than light, neutrino theory of light, tachyon strings, gravitons, ∆±i ‘t-duality’, which makes the infinitely small a mirror-mind of the infinitely large, 10 dimensional strings (properly considered as the 10 dimensions of ∆•st systems), strings as invisible gravitons, non-vibrational, ‘pure lineal’ strings as the infinite ∆-4 tachyon sea over which our world rests, etc. All those features of the dark world ARE MANDATORY FEATURES when we apply the simpler, isomorphic laws and 5D metric proper of all scales of ∆ST to the ∆±4 dark world.

So in fact all what makes them doubt of string and neutrino theory to the point of getting them very nervous whenever they find faster than c speed measures in neutrinos and quasar, IS what PROVES those theories rights and makes so beautiful string theory, once we selected the proper forms (10-dimensional string theories) and adapt them to ∆st mathematically by correcting its main error (redeveloping them not as a newtonian space-time theory but as a relational space-time theory: closed loops ARE time clocks and open strings ARE space quanta).

We shall call ∆-4, as Physicists do the Planck scale, and call its fundamental supœrganism, a **PLANCKTON** in order to unify and streamline the infinite kaleidoscopic mirrors of inflationary mathematics used to describe them, neither a ‘string’, nor a ‘neutrino’, or a form of ‘dark matter’ (begin dark matter just quark matter likely strangelets in the halo – the so called Witten hypothesis – and top quark black holes in its centre – which I call Einstein’s hypothesis as he rightly say that in a hylomorphic universe, they must have a cut-off particle substance to be real, which only can be in quantitative terms heavy bct quarks).

So Planckton, as plankton feeds the sea-chain of life being its minimal cellular unit, will be the minimal unit of the physical world and its scales AS A WHOLE fundamental first particle, to which we shall refer all other sub-parts, sub-equations, kaleidoscopic slightly biased mirrors and elements developed by inflationary mathematical physics at that scale.

To notice finally that from the •Mind perspective it remains to be argued if *the string scale, as we observe the electron mind NOT the Universe is merely equivalent to the description of the minimal mind scale, which is observing from the atomic-ego the visual picture of the galaxy; a philosophical question which shall be considered also for all the other dualities – are we seeing reality or all is a dial go between scales of the electronic mind? (:*

String theory then will provide and we shall describe the conceptual truths behind it the ‘background of Planckton’ over which at the next ±10¹° scale we find the ‘galactic light space-time’ world, or quantum scale:

**∆±3,2: the galaxy atom**

Next we enter into our Island Universe, which we can duly observe and compare inside out – the ∆-3 scale of atoms and the ∆+3 scale of galaxies. And the interesting ∆±i ‘T-duality’ (string jargon) here, is that as we are inside the galaxy, we *can observe the inside of the atom, which we cannot really see, by comparing its self-similarity in the fractal Universe with the inside of the galaxy of which we do have a lot of experimental evidence; and we can compare the outside of the atom, which we can see (electromagnetic entropic space) with the outside of the galaxy (dark entropy space), which we can see, provided with the realisation that scales in the T-dualities are very similar but not necessarily (open question for philosophy of science, or ‘metaphysics’) equal.*

So in this scale we find the strongest experimental evidence ALSO to fill up the gaps of the ∆±4 scale.

*Those scales are the cosmic and gravitational scales studied by astronomy on the large world and by quantum physics on the small world.*

We though can now do further ‘scaling’ and subdivide for more detailed analysis all the elements, parts, sub-parts and 10-decametric sub-§cales of the galaxy-atom as physicists do, in different quantum, electromagnetic, atomic and subatomic analysis.

**∆±2: Sub-parts of the galaxy-atom.**

As a general rule the parts of a whole are obviously a ‘digit less’ in ∆-scales, comprehending a myriad of little elements, but grossly divided as usual in a t±s:-membrane/singularity system and a t x s : vital space, enclosed between them.

For this scale they will be the black hole/nucleon world, and the electron/strangelet outer halo, and in between the star/electromagnetic light space we live in.

*The top quark black hole*

So this new ‘T-duality’, should exist between the inner atom nuclei and the black hole nuclei of galaxies, which we have partially UNIFIED quantitatively with the Unification equation of scales, that shows the black hole galaxy is indeed equivalent in its Schwartzchild radius to the radius of the proton and hence the black hole nuclei of the galaxy should be positive, hence should be a top quark star, as only top quarks are ++ and heavy enough to be the hylomorphic cut-off substance on them. This IS the Einstein’s hypothesis of the nature of black hole as top quark frozen stars, which he said was the only way he would believe in black holes – but as top quarks were not found in his life-time he always remained skeptic of them. Of course, the Einstein’s hypothesis render false and a mere mathematical inflationary theory with zero experimental proof and zero theoretical value, the so-called Hawking’s theory of evaporation of black holes.

To make black holes we just need to make a lot of top quarks, product of the Higgs decay in particle physics or the evolution of mass into its III ‘old age of maximal density of information’, which can be achieved in accelerators that therefore will make them when enough energy is compressed to evolve lighter quarks at CERN. And they will NOT evaporate, but grow exponentially as all seeds do till eating us the planet, what can i say?

In any case for the same reasons the T-dualities in those sub-parts will be between negative strangelet halos of galaxies (Witten’s hypothesis proposed by one of the string theorists) and electrons, also negative in atoms. And then between the light space-time in between and its particle states as photons, and the galactic stars ad its electromagnetic radiation at galactic scale or..

*∆±i≈T-duality photon≈star.*

The field of ∆±2 scaling thus is necessarily huge, but for the sake of simplicity and comprehension of the larger ∆st picture and its isomorphic laws, we just consider in more detail as the key secondary scale, according to the general rule that considers the main task of ∆st to understand the role of man in the Universe, NOT the inner region of atoms (strong forces, quarks, dark world) which is despite the huge sums spent in risky experiments (CERN’s LHC) to explore it, the much more important, less uncertain, better understood and closely related to the electronic mind of humans and machines, world of light at the ∆-i scale and stars at the ∆+1 side.

Again the understanding of those dualities is scanty in present physics – curiously enough denied in black holes, as funny mathematical tools for weirdo theories, which physicists, ‘digital robots’ operating equations of maths they do not fully understand, so much love to do. The most developed are those of string theory and some work has been done on the galaxy-atom, also by Einstein, whose relativity in fact used to simplify calculus models of Hydrogen atoms as Galaxies, from where most results of general relativity at cosmological level were made; and of lately a lot of modelling of stars as photons, specially in the dense region close to the centre of the galaxy has been done, also with excellent results. If we ad the previous Unification equation of charges and masses obtained from this T-duality it seems more than proved.

So ∆-2,3 will be the quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics, which as usual best applies to electronic/light phenomena where it was found (expansions to all other elements of physics and even the human universe, with weirdo wrong egotist Copenhagen interpretations must be partially corrected, or taken to the Tussaud museum of monstrous things 🙂

This scale thus connects also at •level of interpretations with the digital, visual ∆0-humind view, which is the self-centred linguistic frame of reference of visual, Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of a cartesian (graph) in mathematical physics.

As our space-time is 3D perpendicular euclidean light space-time. And so an interesting mental deduction when widening the abstract reductionism of the human ego-centered mind, which uses those cartesian frame of reference, only to study the ‘locomotion’ of physical species far removed from our ∆st nature, is to consider the mental aspects of particles, specially photons and its ∑photon=electron, social grouping in orbitals.

Since if our mind is just a bunch of electrons, which are a bunch of photons, and physical systems obey laws of mathematical, euclidean frames of reference is because quantum physical systems have particle-like points≈singularities that command the systems with sentient, vital properties. And this of course will be a huge field of research – to explain physical events as the product of the vital actions of its atomic and subatomic systems, expressed in the four quantum numbers that describe their energy feeding (principal), information gauging (azimuthal) reproduction (spin couples) and social evolution (magnetic number).

And so this lead us to the final scale of physical systems, the:

**-∆º±1: human, thermodynamic scale.**

This is our scale, because it is the scale of life, of cellular activity, and the scale of our larger, immediate geological world, and as such by far the more important, and the one that should be used as Einstein wanted to model statistical quantum mechanics once the basic correction of describing it with a single time arrow is solved.

So we bring back again the real three time arrows of this scale and its ±1 plasma origin and finale, just in case you haven’t got through the infinite repetitions of your brain,t eh fact that entropy only theories merely took laws that apply ONLY to gaseous entropic state, disregarded the liquid, balanced and solid, informative states of matter, and on top alas, hyperbolically extended those laws to all scales and cosmologies, giving birth to the absurd big-bang theory, and concepts about a dying universe, where disorder and chaos is the best possible and only future state of reality.

According to the rule that close scales are better observed, hence its laws more accurately the task thus IS inverse to that of weirdo quantum physics: to streamline with thermodynamic homologies as quantum pilot-theory does, the philosophy of science of the quantum world today in egotist ‘mood’ into the realism of thermodynamics.

**Magnetic or thermodynamic human scale?**

*the understanding of the human scale, which is the one we have more information about and seems to be not so ‘clean-cut’ and harmonious as the lower quantum and upper gravitational scales with its awesome symmetries between the galaxy-atom and the atomic galaxy… from the Unification equation to the mass-families and its symmetries in celestial bodies, and ternary ages and symmetries.*

*there is an intermediate magnetic scale, of perfect order, completely embedded in the awesome symmetric equations between the quantum and gravitational scale, acting as a bridge between both, with the gravitomagnetic equations, the gravitational fields of cosmic bodies at the lower scale of the galaxy-atom and its symmetric equations and clear emergence from the quantum field, carrying energy and form into the cosmic field.*

*when properly understood in 10 D is unparalleled because it deals with the whole – conceded – but this does not eliminate the importance of biology and history, as we do have a closer better picture of them, and ultimately matter far more for our survival as a species, which only entropic physicists and its mass-destruction weapons and theories can destroy.*

*So physics is the most beautiful discipline but entropic physicists the most dangerous ‘terrorists’, as usual the human side NOT being up to the beauty and ethical standing of the organic Universe.*

**The different hypothesis over the number of scales.**

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the *mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite. *

*On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one. *

In terms of mathematics, ∆nalysis becomes self-evidently the most important branch of mathematical physics. But as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best to parametrize and model the 5D.

The 3 different perspective departing from a certain point of view, in this case man, gives different perceptions of larger and smaller beings as the distortion of their time clocks and size steps vary.

And this gives birth to 3 possible hypothesis:

- That they are both equal in identity terms (not likely). Then the game constantly repeats.
- That they are fractal in its equality, that is, they maintain most isomorphisms but are ‘varieties’ of different the with certain ‘space-time’, exi=st constants changed. Then for higher and lower 10 scales that conform other full game there will be a parallel type of Universe.
- That they are only the 10 scales that there is. That is, that the Universe is NOT infinite in scales but 10-scalar. And this theory gives birth to two possible scenarios. that the Planes of the Universe are identical because we humans perceive them – limits upwards and downwards, then the equation moves to the mind, considered now a system which perceives equally smaller and larger beings – somehow with similar mental senses. Or that they are really, objectively the end-limits and so we talk of a flat Universe with a limit of scales in the 5th dimension, which seems unreal for many reasons – we cannot conceive a universal dimension in finite terms and it is not sound epistemologically.

We shall here only consider the formalism that unifies the atom and the galaxy, and maybe in the future will discuss some of the awesome metric systems above described of possible limits in the 5th dimension to all those Universes.

By the same reason, we do not know the exact nature of the Ot element of a Star, which brings about a general uncertainty of any relative past-present-future, topological structure of the Universe, where the relative future (center) and past (membranes) are rather invisible compared to the central region of ‘present’ larger, evident space-time cycles.

In topology we talk of closed and open balls. The Œ-fractal knots of space-time cycles of the Universe are from an external point of view, often open balls, where the central point and the membrane seem not to exist. But from the internal point of view of the Œ-mind they are closed balls. That is, they do have an ∆-sphere structure.

Now the procedure to study with the isomorphic method those scales is the inverse of the present astrophysical method: we study downwards with the synthetic method the whole first as a super organism with a world cycle, in this case the super organism of the galaxy with its quasar world cycle.

Then we study its inner parts, its cellular parts, and then only finally its outer world, its cosmological realm.

And we study first the organic properties of the system as they are the teleological finality of all systems (to survive by having an efficient ternary structure in space), then we study its 3 ages of life, and then we study its actions and scales in the five dimension. Only with this synthetic knowledge of the system, which does not require more than simple mathematics, as it is an organic biological description of it, is completed.

We enter into the details of the other 5 secondary isomorphisms, filled with mathematical equations that explore first, the ratios and processes and interaction between the parts of the system in space (6th isomorphism of social classes and 7th isomorphism of universal constants), and then we study it in time (8th isomorphism of diversification of species), to finally study it in scales of the 5th dimension (9th isomorphism of social decametric scales and constants).

The o-isomorphism of the mind of the system as it is also an unknown, and the non-Euclidean geometry of the system is studied in the analysis of its fractal generator and growth of scales from points to lines to planes, can be analyzed at any time. I do usually consider it the ‘metaphysical element of each science’ and discuss it either as the alpha (specially in human systems, where we accept both in societies and individuals the existence of an upper informative caste or neuronal mind) or as the omega, in systems such as a galaxy where to know that the Black hole seems in Maldacena equations to represent in 5D a 4D cosmic body, is not relevant at all.

Yet we only perceive the light membrane of informative electrons and electromagnetic forces. So the thesis derived of the unification equation that shows the ‘invisible’ world of quarks with 99.9% of our mass to be self-similar to the cosmological world of black holes and dark Entropy, which means that a galaxy is an atom of the next scale is a metaphysical question, cannot be tested experimentally.

A more extreme theory of ‘Endophysics’ would imply that our perception diminishes with distance and size; and so we perceive so little of those huge and small worlds that they seem totally equal to us, because our mind-world reconstructs self-similar forms with so little information, but they are not. This thesis derives of the fact that what we see is what the mind constructs with bits and bites of information and Entropy, not what there is out there. And so it might be possible that the mind first constructs always simple spheres and lines, without detail and so we see galaxies and atoms as self-similar forms. But this ‘Cartesian concept’ seems too subjective to me.

In any case, we can only know-know the world of man around us. In other words, biology is the queen of sciences, as all systems are invariant, and so we can know better the details of systems of multiple space-times, studying us, the measure of all things.

All this said, the strongest proof that the fractal scales of the Universe are infinite and self-similar (not identical) making possible the concept of infinite repetitions is obviously the fractal Unification equation of charges and masses, U.C _{G,C} × M = w^{2} × r^{3} that relates electromagnetic and gravitational forces at the scale of atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes. Thus if the Universe has infinite fractal space-times, each one will define with its fractal U.C._{G} a different content of spatial speed and informative density. Yet, as the Unification Equation of G and Q, of masses and charges shows, all will be vortices of space and time, sharing flows of lineal Entropy. So the Game of Exi=stence, its time arrows and scalar structures will remain.

In the fractal paradigm, the electromagnetic and gravitational membranes belong to 2 different realities, the microcosms and the macrocosms, between which mankind are sandwiched. Yet the macrocosmic gravitational and microcosmic, fractal membranes are self-similar worlds: if we treat charges as microcosmic masses and compare the structure of cosmological galaxies and microcosmic atoms, we find a striking self-similarity, already noticed by Eddington (theory of the great numbers).

And the metaphysical question is if that self-similarity goes beyond the galaxy and below the atom into a higher and lower scale, in which case a galaxy will be an atom of an infinite higher Universe and/or an atom will be a galaxy of an infinite smaller Cosmos. All in all there are 3 possible hypotheses for the Universe, according to the ternary principle that gives birth always to 3 solutions and forms to any informative system or question:

– Max. Ps: The galaxy is homologous to an atom, so we are truly nothing and the Universe extends to infinity. We exist in a Universe, which is a hydrogen cloud of gas, and most galaxies are simple Bohr atoms with central proton black holes. And beyond there are infinite atoms and upper scales.

– sp=Ti: There are not upper and lower scales beyond the galaxy and the atom. So galaxies are the highest units of an infinite space-time. This is the most boring hypothesis of them all.

– Max.To: Galaxies form complex organizations and are cells of an organic Universe, pegged to other organic Universes. The Webb telescope might illuminate this hypothesis if it finds a wall of radiation at z=100c, which would be an indication of a new hyper-decametric scale of dark matter and Entropy.

String theorists (duality between the small and big) hint also at a possible further hierarchy between the next smaller scale (the string) and the highest possible scale imagined by mankind (a Universe-like a string, made of 100 billion galaxies). A string membrane and a Universal membrane can be treated with self-similar equations in some models of string theory (even if a more accurate treatment requires background independent string theories, in which the error of Newton – an absolute Cartesian space-time – is corrected). The principle though remains invariant in all those models: It is possible to create a reality of infinite hierarchies, in which each scale is self-similar but no equal to the next hyper-scale of the Universe, set by its fundamental stable entities, which are the immortal protons and black holes.

The infinite scale theory is on my view the most probable, because it has more experimental evidence: the fractal, network structure of the galaxies and dark Entropy, shown in the previous picture is quite obvious. Further on, the existence of such fractal, bigger social scales have been shown by the astrophysicist Pietronero in its study of the Sloan grand scale mappings of galaxies^{11}.

*Recap*. The hypothesis of an ∞ hierarchical Universe is reinforced by the fractal Unification equation; by Eddington’s theory of big numbers that relates a proton radius and the radius of the galactic big-bang; by the work of Pietronero mapping the grand scale structure of galaxies and our understanding of a fractal network of dark matter that surrounds them.

Yet before we explain all that, we have to formalize the fundamental discovery we have made – that light is NOT only an energy field in motion but ALSO a form of space; which comes naturally from the fact that:

Knowledge is relative to a fixed, still frame of reference, but that frame of reference is always in motion. It is in fact both things. IT depends on how we see it

Einstein saw space-time fixed, Galileo the sun fixed, Ptolemy the earth fixed, Abrahamic religions saw man fixed as a life point of view.

**It is the Universe infinite and eternal?**

**The** founding father of relational space-time, Leibniz, affirmed that we lived in the most perfect of worlds, where each point was a world in itself, a commentary which brought much derisive laugh during the XVIII c. ending in the cynical best-seller of Messieur Voltaire, ‘Candid’.

It is though the most perfect of worlds because it is immortal in time, infinite in space, absolutely simple in its ultimate program of existence, ∆i->∆æ->∆e->∆œ->∆û, perception-motion-feeding-reproduction-evolution…

And yet the more complex of worlds when its infinite iterations combine into the varieties of species in existence.

But why we know it is infinite and immortal?

The immortality of the Universe is born in the very nature of its ultimate substance: 2 formal motions, where the ‘form’ is the mirage of the senses of a o-mind that gauges by simplifying all the information of the infinite Universe into bidimensional still mappings that can fit in the mind.

So we see forms but all is motion (Galileo’s Paradox: e pur si muove). And since motion is the nature of |-space and O-Time, there is no way to stop the flow of space-time and its infinite actions. Because a line is just part of a very long cycle that closes into itself, the universe is constantly breaking into pieces that come together into wholes to be dissolved in the explosion of On-2 death.

But the proof of its infinity and absolute relativity depends on a question: are the scales of parts that become wholes, which dissolve into death in big bangs of energy, back into ‘planes of space’ (corpses, antiparticles, big bangs: M->E). That is, there is in the limits of our direct perception of reality,On±3, galaxies and atoms, any hint that the scales are so similar and so much embedded in lower and upper On±4 planes which we hardly perceive but make us think there is beyond and below new unending Universal Planes?

If so, if each galaxy is just the beginning of an infinite number of higher scales and each atom just the wholeness of an infinite number of lower planes, if ∆±∞, is the structure of the 5th dimension. If the 5th dimension is both lineal (without apparent limit in its co-invariance: Sæ->∞ / To ->∞ = C), and cyclical (with repetition of form between the limiting scales of atoms and galaxies), the Universe is absolutely relative (any Ot is both an infinite and an infinitesimal) and man has no importance, beyond its perception of everything from its centered o-point of view: Man = ∆o.

** 5D, Absolute Relativity and the meaning of knowledge.**

Now, absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Œ is even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 10 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

**∆<|3|: BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES- SCALES. **

**The ‘fifth’ SCALAR dimension from a discrete perspectives: networks of points. The language of topo-bio-logical space-time beings; the supœrganism.**

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, Se and Ti. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

**The Scales and dimensions of the Universe. Its metric.**

Systems grow in size and ‘number’ through the different ∆-planes of social evolution of the Universe.

The main ‘∆-planes’, in which the social group ’emerges’ as a complete ‘whole’ after its S10 social evolution when Sp, Tƒ and St networks of energy information and reproduction put them together are shown in the next graph:

We talk then of 3 dimensions of physical entities, ∆i=1 forces, ∆i=2 atoms and ∆i=3 molecules, isomorphic to the 3 larger scales of ∆i=7 stars, ∆i=8 galaxies and ∆i=9 local Universes, and within them, sandwiched around the i=5 human scale, an ∆-1=4 cellular bio-chemical scale and a larger, ∆+1=6 social scale.

## **EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things thus are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

**HISTORIC SCALES: ****∆1,2**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

**SOCIAL MODELS. THE FIFTH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ UPANISHADS, on the fact each mind has a language, with the same ternary F(t) operandi G(S) syntax, NOT only mathematics.

‘Love each other as I have loved you’

Jesus* On the arrow of eusocial love , the program of ‘God’ that builds up the 5th dimension.*

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’ *Einstein, on what truly should matter to science – the whys.*

‘The why is the only thing a physicist does not question’ * Feynman (On the reductionism of physicists)*

‘ I know the non-AE thoughts of God; the mind of the Universe, since I am made to its image and likeness’ *ls*

‘Reality is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe’ Plato

**The social scale. ****Everything is love.**

Now what we shall state is vital for you to understand what is the purpose of life and history: because the Universe constantly reproduces information, the goal of the Universe is to create social super organisms, which in verbal terms translated into the arrow of social love for your species. So we can observe an absolute arrow of time, that of social evolution, which creates new wholes from parts, molecules from simpler atoms, cells from simpler molecules, then organisms, super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies, etc. Reality is NOT about death but about life.

The absolute arrow of time of social evolution Is the ‘fifth dimension’ of the scalar Universe that constantly expands its scales of social growth.

In the next graph we show the two ‘false and real pyramids’ of social behaviour, according to ‘capitalist, military idol-ogies’ of dog-eat-dog societies vs, humanist sciences of social evolution’:

So much for absurd ideologies of history that deny the power of social love and the need of mankind to evolve together into a social super organism. They are military, dog-eat-dog false ideologies of DEATH AND ENTROPY, which deny the ultimate laws of the Universe. The absolute arrow of social evolution, of time IS love. ITS relative arrows ARE ternary worldcycles of life and death. They are explained in great detail in the right side, on the section of general systems, the scientific r=evolution of philosophy of sciences and biology taken place in the XXI c:

The Universe is no longer modelled as a machine, a simplex version of a future robotic organism, but as an organism, and so are all sciences (upper right side graph), based in the laws of the ‘scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe, made of ‘planes of space-time’ of different ‘size’ and ‘speed’ in its time clocks.

I.e. You enclose inside as a super organism, the cellular scale made of smaller cells in spatial size, which run faster time clocks; and cells are made of smaller genetic molecules that run faster time clocks, and so on till reaching the scale of particles. Humanity then in the upper scale of religions, nations, civilisations and ultimately mankind as a super organism, developed in time as History, IS the scale above the individual. And we can study with the isomorphic=equal laws of all systems of Nature regardless of scale.