**I. 5D TIMES’ 3 ARROWS**

In the graphs, the fifth dimension of organic scalar space-time shows how the Universe *is formally and structurally social, with an absolute arrow of ‘future’, which is the organisation of individuals into social networks that deliver energy and information to all its parts. *

This again can be mathematised with a simple metric equation, which defines how all those scales organise systems and social organisms, in a symbiotic manner, as *smaller scales code larger systems with less information that deliver energy and motion to the lower scales.*

Indeed, as we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion.

So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.

But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:

‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’ *Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.*

What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.

What if you ‘are’ the space-time that moves, like when a wave of light, which IS the space-time underling the galaxy (the so-called background radiation) moves. Einstein proved it has a constant c-speed, *wherever we measure it.*

So goes when other waves moves. They doe so with a simple formula: Spe (wavelength) x Frequency (speed of time clock) = K;

* *So because precisely the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain *connected organic structure are co-invariant, *it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):

*‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of space-time).’*

*That simple equation is* the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.

So where it is the 4th dimension of Einstein there?

In science any expansion of knowledge must inclose a previous theory as a ‘limiting case’.

For example Einstein’s relativity is merely the expansion of Galilean relativity and its equation of speed, v=s//t, to include also motions at c-light speed, which as we have seen is the underlying space-time of our galaxy.

So when you go at the maximal speed of the galaxy’s space, as when you swim as fast as the river’s water there are ‘curls’ and ‘drags’, and so Einstein added a factor, ct, to Galileo’s formula, which disappears if you go slow – (when you swim slow in the river, you do not really affect the speed of the river space that much and there are not added effects).

So alas, if you observe the pyramidal graph of layers of the 5th dimension, what Einstein does is to study 2 of those layers, the ones of ‘light space-time’ or ‘quantum layer’ and the one of gravitational space, below it.

And there is where its concepts of space-time as a 4th dimension applies.

All the other layers do obey however the wider metric equation we just have described: Sp x Ti = K, AND IT is that simple because the simpler a theory and the more facts it explains the more truth it is. But do not be fooled by such simplicity, as TO AD the temporal information, carried by those varying clock speeds to the mix, IS so sorely NEEDED, that an astounding amount of facts do happen and become explained.

Let us then before we study what it means to move through the 5th dimension, the nature of cyclical time world cycles and supœrganisms, extended across 3 ∆±i scales of the fifth dimension:

*In the graph, two representations of the scales of stience. We have finally after many changes of index, settled down in an ∆o, in the scale of cellular life, as ultimately the mind-ego is also a small cellular region of the brain, and the symmetry of the limits of cosmos, ∆±4, where perception is visible to man at the Planck and Universal scale, become ‘symmetric’ with a cell-centered scale. But as most of this work spreads for decades behind, the most used classifications are those above. *

*In the right a scale from 0, the smallest scale below quantum physics, and the underlying o-| game of strings, of time and space. Man occupies then an ∆+4 scale. In the left the most often used scaling with man at ∆o, as an individual. This scale is the commonest on old texts, as it made quite evident the symmetry of form between charges on the quantum scale and galaxies (∆±3), which is lost when we make the cell the center. *

* It is ultimately a case of classification of human abstract knowledge. In nature what really matters is the particle/wave/field states for each point of view, above and below, from where it extracts energy and information and so there are as many subjective ∆± scales as beings in the Universe.*

To be fully aware of the relativism of scale, however we should use instead of the natural 0 to 10 scales of size from the smallest quanta to the largest cosmos, a much more epistemologically correct graph in which the human point of view is at its center, to stress the deformation of perception by the mind, which ultimately make the galaxy and the atom self-similar. We shall in practice use both indistinctly, as both have a meaning for a certain perspective of analysis.

Indeed, while it might be considered that stiences do not have a hierarchy, hierarchies can be established according to a ‘point of few of knowledge – a certain ontology’.

If we were to consider human survival the most important will of our survival program above any knowledge, we would make of medicine and history the centre of it all. If we worship some ‘partial, reductionist’ shivaite culture of weapons, or physical lineal entropic only explanations of reality you will sponsor the 1 to 10 scale starting in forces. And this scale will have also fruitful uses when reconstructing the relative social future of wholes that co-exist with parts, which appear in time ‘before them’. So the *∆ pyramid of stiences is also an arrow of time of future, social evolution as whole new scales require the pre-existence in time of its parts. So larger beings are older, something seems silly to say but has deep implications in the symmetry of space-time and the way both mess **together:*

On view of the previous statements, we can consider that science, or rather *stience*, as it studies always Space-Time beings, has also a scalar structure as each main stience studies the species of a relative scale of different size and speed of time, of universal organisms, which IN THE LARGER WHOLE, WHICH CO-EXISTS IN ALL SCALES, WHAT YOU COULD CALL THE GOD (∞ scales)- UNIVERSE (∞ distance) acquires its full meaning. Then within that being all scales co-exist and interact:

*01. Metaphysics,* which studies the invisible forces below the light space-time scale; through…

2. *physics*, which studies the known-known atoms.

3. *chemistry* which studies its social organisations, molecules.

4. *geology* that studies larger systems of matter and its parallel biological sciences, which studies cells (*bio-chemistry*), organisms, (5. *biology*), among them the human organism (5. *medical sciences*), its social super organisms (6. *history*) and those industrial organisms made of metal, called machines, (6.*economics* that studies the industrial r=evolution of machines)…

In a planet, which is itself merely a particle of a larger solar system studied by 7, *astrophysics; itself a fractal point of a galactic ‘cell’, analysed by 8. astronomy, which acts as a *unit of a larger absolute Universe we hardly perceive, the largest scale studied by *cosmology*.

While on top of all those analysis appear *‘scientific religion’* the analysis of the subconscious collective minds of mankind (anthropomorphic, western abrahamic religions of eusocial love) and the Universe (eastern, taoist-buddhist religions of the living Universe).

In the decades old graph, the scales of the Universe and the main stiences that studies them. Part of the systematisation I plan to carry about in this web for future researchers of what should become naturally the philosophy of stience of the III millennium consists on setting exact quantitative and qualitative epistemological structures where to fit all the knowledge developed by mankind in 3 millennia of rational thought.

Yet given the natural decametric structure of the Universe it is easy to classify disciplines of knowledge and species according to scale. Other matter is where to start the order – shall we consider 0 the smallest parts, or the whole infinite that encloses them all – after all as Vonnegut put it infinity is just a twisted zero. In between scales, in both ways we number humans in the middle ‘5’, either counting as above from 0 forces to 10 cosmos or as below, from 0 cosmos to 10 forces?

But shall we consider the human the middle scale or as the perceiver, in the middle, the ∆o scale, numbering with negative and positive indexes (±i) the scales above and below to show the fascinating symmetries according to distance (so for example ∆±3 atoms and galaxies have similar structure, ∆±1 cells and nations also, etc.) We have settled for 01 force, 5 man, and 9 the cosmos in the 3rd line analysis of different stiences, though when considering epistemological themes, we will consider ∆0 to be the human scale.

*In the graph, the main planes of existence of the fractal Universe, its clocks of time, and space-time symmetries shown for the human beings, which occupies the relative central plane, ∆0. *

The planes of the Universe write in inverse fashion, depending on which parameter we study, the form or information (form reproduced through motion) of the system, or the size in space or energy (space moving a form) we observe.

The complex Universe is paradoxical, both because the mind is imperfect in its perception (so it stops cyclical clocks of time into forms with no motion, it perceives smaller planes of energy as spatial distances and so on) but because to maintain its ‘isomorphism’, its ‘invariance’ across the different cyclical planes of Times and Spaces, it must take when it gives, give when it take, to stay immortal it must be a zero sum, a place in perpetual balance.

Thus for each Space-time plane, we should really use a dual ‘complex number’ (a,bi), where a would be the value of its spatial scale and b, the value of its ‘informative’ cyclical time scale. In the complex mathematical model of ∆ST this is truth in more than a way (∆-numbers have certain importance when dealing with cyclical time calculus), but we are not going so far in this web or else the i will mean I am the only person ever to read these texts )-;

What we mean here is that both scales are inverse because when size increases time speed desecrates and vice versa.

And so the scale of increasing Size of Space planes, reads as:

S= 1-Force < S=2-Atom < … <5-Human<6-World <….S=9<Cosmos.

While the scale of increasing form or information reads as:

O-Cycles: 1-Local Universe < 2-Galaxy <3-Star<4-Earth<5-Human<6-Cell<7-Molecule<8-Atom<9-Force…

Only Man is in the center of both *because it is the relative central plane of existence from where we observe the rest of them.*

*And yet the logarithmic sum of both or the Existential force of any species of any isomorphic plane, Se x Tƒ = ∆, remains constant. *

This curious paradox comes to full realization when we consider the different ‘algebraic operations’ we can do with the two ‘fixed’ elements of the Universe, its Temporal Form, Tƒ, and its Spatial Size, Se.

One of the simplest ways to classify those cyclical planes is with the use of the logarithmic scale, but one of enormous ‘size-cyclical volume’, the U=10¹º logarithmic scale that converts individuals into Universals of a higher plane of existence. So a minimum of ±10¹º cells gives birth to an organism, the same number of DNA atomic ties gives a DNA molecule, the same number of stars gives birth to a Galaxy and so on. So each Plane or whole will be made of that number of individuals and vice versa, in terms of form, of information, since we do not distinguish more than the whole in a given plane of existence, each lower S-plane will have 10¹º cells/stars/atoms etc.

Thus form, the quantum, discontinuous perception diminishes, but the ‘continuous’ perception that aggregates all those beings into a ‘single whole’ extended into a plane of space increases by the same proportion.

Thus we write in the 10¹º logarithmic scale, 1, 2, 3, 4…. 10 Planes of Space-size, and we write the inverse diminution of information in the logarithmic scale as we increase that ‘continuous’ size.

Then we can do ‘calculus’ of the value of each isomorphic, Cyclical (Tƒ) Plane (S) of Space-time and we will find out (since logarithms ad potencies) the same value:

If we add the relative value of its planes of space and Cycles of form, the sum of any Plane of Space and its Time cycles remains constant. For example for the atom, the value of its relative size is 2, and the speed of its time cycles of form is 8:

Atom: 2+8 = 1o.

For the Galaxy the result is the inverse: 2 is the relative value of its cycles of time and 8 of its size: 8+2=10.

But all of them have the same 10 value, including man: 2+8=10.

However when we multiply both elements to find out the relative Existential Force of the System, from the human perspective: S x Tƒ, things greatly vary:

Atoms and Galaxies again have the same value, 2 x 8= 8 x2 = 16, which is also natural to its relative ‘isomorphism’, as the equations of its cycles (charges and masses) and planes (electromagnetic and gravitational planes) are the same (in the metric of the 5th dimension that unify them both).

The reader who feels confused by those paradoxes, must become accustomed to the paradoxical structure of reality and the metric of the 5th dimension. The dualities of subjective and objective knowledge, of the mind that stops motion and selects form to perceive and map out reality, of the barriers to perception beyond the light-forces of our space-time galactic Universe, etc. etc. We do try to introduce those paradoxes by showing inverse cardinals for the order of space-time planes of cyclical existence, when perceived only as planes of space by size, and only as cyclical forms of time.

Ultimately though the ‘isomorphism’ of reality is precisely the equal value of any Space-Time plane, when combining both parameters. And that is the reason of the absolute relativity of the Universe.

Further on those planes are infinite since as we observe the inverted values of galaxies and atoms, are the same and the metric show that atoms and galaxies do respond to the same equation, so when we enter the invisible regions of 0 information and ∞ size (Universe beyond c-speed of dark energy) and vice versa, the region of perfect form and 0 motion-size (universe of dark matter, below 0 k order), we imagine there will be a new game of 10 planes of isomorphic existence where other beings will have is fractal point of view.

A 5D universe cannot be constructed without 3 arrows of time, to define at least, the present Universe of 4D locomotions studied by physicists with ‘derivatives’ of present locomotions, V(st)=S/T, and the collateral 6 other motions of time happening in the 4Dimensional timespace block.

But also through the 2 UP AND DOWN ARROWS OF PAST AND FUTURE, ENTROPY AND INFORMATION, WHOSE ‘FRICTION’, e x i CREATES THE PRESENT space-time.

REALITY, the present, ST, is a constant friction of the ∆±1 planes of Spe entropy and Tiƒ, information to create the energy of the visible universe. As energy, present is conserved, past, entropy and future information must preserve its balance, brutally frictioning the world cycles of lesser beings under their domain. This is the brutal side of living between a membrane of pure entropy motion and a mind with no motion no pity, no purpose but the selfish maintenance of its ∆+1 singular mind-world.

*In the graph, the 3 arrows of space-time considered from the perspective of the 5th dimension, upwards in the pyramid, the ‘arrow’ of FUTURE, or wholes, as they co-exist with the smaller beings, and hence, as we increase the complexity of the 5th dimension; the arrow of entropy, with its inverse to the previous arrow, and the arrow of ‘present space-time, which is EACH OF THE PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION, OR width of the pyramid.*

Indeed, what a whole achieves is simultaneity of action in space, over smaller being. Its domain thus must manifest a coordination and higher speed in space, without entropy or disorder when it integrates the motion of its parts.

To that aim the parts must be able to absorb and process information faster than the whole, so its variations and fluctuations at microcosmic scale become a smooth function or ensemble of undistinguishable synchronous continuous beings in the whole ∆+1 scale. The symbiosis due to the paradoxical inverse properties of beings in two ∆±1 scales of both arrows is what makes wholes and part stick together to the point that both become one.

The fifth dimension is an organic dimension, ruled by two inverse parameters, the implosive, informative time clocks that store the information of the system and shrinks them in space, and the entropic expansive motion of parts, which want to become free of organic wholes that quiet them and absorb part of its information as territories of order of its informative networks and forces.

As parts must come before wholes, in any ∆±1 scales, the ∆-1 scale must be considered the relative past of present, ∆-scales of relative future, ∆+1 wholes.

Once this is established, as ∆-1 relative past spaces are made of herds of ∆-1 faster wholes than the future, co-existent larger planes, of ∆+1, we can wonder how the whole controls the masses of ∆-1 parts. And this is achieved by two rough methods, confinement and fields of massive energy and information distributed as waves to the whole ‘reservoir’ of ∆-1 cellular/atomic network points.

The fifth dimension has therefore 2 different motions: one of information from lower atomic, genetic and memetic scales which is reproduced upwards, and one of motion and whole management provided from upper wholes and its ‘physiological networks’ of energy, reproduction and information, whose fields of hormonal and nervous messages, program by simultaneity the whole mass of cellular/atomic/citizen elements of the supeorganism (biological/physical/social).

**Existence between planes**

The biggest ‘dark world’ to the human @mind seems to be the understanding of other planes of existence, given the fact we perceive in a single plane of space-time, and have only discovered the other planes through the use of instruments, telescopes and microscopes.

Yet stience which essentially is the study of all the species of the Universe in its details, according to its belonging to those ∆Ξlanes has been with us for 500 years. aND YET, the understanding of the scales of existence and the relationships between ‘particulars and universals, parts and wholes, atoms and networks, cells and tissues’ – the laws between ∆-1 parts and ∆-wholes.

Planes of existence is the proper philosophical term, used in this 1st line to define them, as we exist travelling in size from seeds to individuals to social wholes. We are an ambulatory collection of some trillion cells, citizens of a super organism of some 7 billion humans:

In the graph, we see the 3 main scales of human existence. Scales are thus organic, and each being and its Œmind will co-exist in such 3 scales, whose interactions cycles, exchanges and reproductions of energy and information, aggregation and dissolution processes are the stuff of which existence is made.

Now in as much as we are a ternary being in space-time, through 3 co-existing scales, managed by a ŒMind language, mapping constantly the world around in terms of the language and its embed ¬æ program of ‘exist’ence, we can define a quite interesting fourth scale – that of the mind that perceives itself in time through a language, software, which expresses as the most suitable for survival the will of the program of existence and its space-time actions, becoming the logic knot or mind itself that guides the being

So our mind is our I=eye<Wor(l)d, the language itself, reason why in the same manner a seed of information, called semen can reproduce our body, the language-mind can be reproduced through teaching, master-student, parents-sons. We are *constantly reproducing and preserving information, and the way those flows of information egos selfs minds and languages which mimic the ultimate language of them all ‘ the mind of god, the game of existence itself, in its naked beauty and symmetries’, go on living and reproducing its thoughts and visual and emotional (inner body actions), brings about what we call ‘being’.*

So being never cease because through fractal planes we reproduce seeds and pieces of ourselves constantly through our actions and reproductions of wor(l)ds and seminal genetic and memetic forms of in-form-ation.

This is again the essence of reality as all motions are indeed topological reproductions into a lower scale, which reforms its reorganisation of part or the complete whole.

In the graph, the constant reproduction of information through travels to the past to a seminal seed, electromagnetic wave or memetic book, which will reproduce and emerge as a larger whole define the essential ‘business’ of planes of existence, the reproduction and emergence of beings across such planes, with a generic ¬Æ Generator:

O∆ (father) < O∆-1 (seed of information) ∑O∆-1>|∆(young offspring)

The reproductive beat of a father from a larger scale, ∆, which produces an informative seed, O∆-1 in the lower relative past, cellular, particle or memetic scale, which will thereafter reproduce back to the future an organism, ∑∆, is a ‘classic’ of ¬Æ motions through the symmetries of space time (∆,∑, ≥ ≤), which determine the possibility of communicating and transferring information into a replica of the @mind-being. Yet for the process of palingenesis through scale to happen, information must be run faster in lower scales, and *an immanent content to the ‘will of the mind’, a program of @tions and survival must exist as ‘immanent’ to the space-time beings, when they form.*

In the graph, information and energy are different arrows=directions on the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe. Departing from an original ‘same’ amount of ‘base energy’, in the relative ∆o scale perceived by the ∆i being, new codes of information create new virtual whole existences, emerging on the support of relative past forms of space, stretched through present waves of reproduction of information into co-existing simultaneous, organic whole-planes, where that energy is tied as information of linguistic mental mappings of the self.

**Immortality of the fleeting, derivative present of finitesimal monads**

It is only present what you are, that fleeting infinitesimal, ∫ Åœ ∂s; sandwiched as you are between your simultaneous derivative present space and your integral of actions, your world cycle, a mere fractal point, Œ, §upœrganism at best, mostly ∆•st of space-time… Immortality does not belong to us but to the eternal game, which is found in the remote past, the point of maximal entropy and the absolute future, the point of maximal information, the yin and yang, Lord Visnu and Shiva, the destroyer of infinite present worlds that will be repeated ad nauseam.

Immortality in that sense seems not to be the privilege of present, except by the sheer boredom of its eternal repetitions, as the present is too dumb to create more than a few forms of the whole potential of the language… but of past, the void and future, the form, which as present moves, rebalance themselves, with the trick of death:

*Equation of Death:* ∆+1<<∆-1

A jump in which information disappears in ∆+1 and enters ∆-1 as a wave of pure motion entropy, a big bang.

So the derivative flow of future form, slowly compressing reality, is jumped out by the equation of death, E=mc2, in the physical space.

Indeed, how they do it. How future jumps into the past to die? How the flows of form, dissolve into nothingness of existence, knowing though they will be potentially reborn by the sheer number of infinite similar happenings, on the 5D block DETERMINED BY THE SIMPLICITY OF THE GAME AND ITS LIMITE COMBINATIONS COMPARED TO THE SIMULTaNEOUS NUMBER OF GAMES BEING PLAYED OUT IN ALL THE PHYSICAL SCALES OF REALITY.

HENCE THE infinity of happenings, and the limits of the happenings allowed, bring the discotnous immortality of the game. THUs this means after we die, we jump too not only in entropy but in information at least a scale up to the one of gods?

THIS BEAUTIFUL QUESTION ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD AND AFTER LIFE, WILL BE STUDIED in the part of God, last post of this blog.

Nt. We use normally for the 5th dimension the symbol ∆, in terms of time dynamics, which are more hierarchical as it is indeed an arrow ‘head’ put upwards, to symbolise time themes of the space-time fifth dimension.

We shall use, ∑, with its ‘summitry of populations sense, its 3 planes (the one in the middle merely suggested, and its five vertex points and perimeter – one opened) as a good symbology to understand the fifth dimension ins pace. And finally when studying 3-dimensional super organisms, we talk of 3 organic Ξlanes and use the greek beautiful symbol for those 3 organic planes with the self in its center.

From this simple scheme we can deduce many properties and interrelationships between the 3 arrows.

*Energy: ∫Max. ei∂s∂t*

*Information: ∫Max. i e ∂t∂s*

In the graph, the repetition of the actions of beings under laws is a deterministic notions. The actions in fact turn around balanced exchanges of energy and information, measured with different clocks in different scales (E=hv, =knt = 1/2 mv²).

In classic science the parameter of energy, is closer to the concept of the sum of all time motions of a system and as such closer related to time. Here we use it closer to the concept of kinetic energy, and in general ‘within the wider mark’ of the concept of Spe, |-entropic motion. To be more exact thus as energy and time are the 2 elements of an action, we will try to use as much as possible the correspondence principle and clarify those differences as we go along those texts.

in essence, 2 planes of energy and information as ‘fractal planes’, which have ‘endure’ a process of dissolution or evolution, as dictated by the 5 postulates that convert back and forth, points into lines, waves, networks, topological planes and Mind-organisms, will change their clocks of time and their clocks of space, into slightly ‘fractal different’ but ‘self similar’ clocks. So in quantum physics the constant of action and time clocks are E=hv, energy then becomes in the quantitative mode of science a very good parameter, once we deepen its philosophical meaning to measure more than the ‘entropy field’ in which the system moves, the ‘storage of energy in the body’, the ‘body capacity, and often even the ‘total existential force’ of the being. But as we move from plane to plane, the system changes so deeply from atoms, cells, and citizens into wholes, networks, crystals, organisms, societies, that the parameters change. An interesting region in that sense is that of the ‘collapse of a wave into a point’ or ‘point of emergence and birth’ and viceversa, the point of death and collapse of a system between 2 planes, since death turns out after careful examination of data for all systems that it implies a fall two ‘∆-scales’ into minimal organisation:

Death: ∆+1<<∆-1

How indeed the game of existence is performed in each network-creation of similar mind selves that will knot flows of energy and information, increasingly creating a virtual mind-emerging reality on the fiction that they do exist, that all those monads self-serving communicating similar mind distorted knot views are real enough to command a domain and start to magically distort around a self-fixed point of view, enough whirlwinds of exi=st-ences as to be of note to the whole and become more than virtual real, generated in reproductive radiations upon eternal time.

In the graphs, the scalar dimension of space-time, generically called in these texts the ‘fifth dimension’, is an arrow of future time ‘upwards’, in the creation of wholes and ‘dissolution’ of wholes into larger, smaller, less informed parts downwards, to the relative past. As such it establishes a generic time arrow towards social evolution into the future, and allows systems to travel back and forth in that time arrow as they complete a world cycle of existence between its generation as a seed of an ∆-1 seminal/atomic scale into its social, emerging whole, ∆, existing in an ∆+1 world, from where after gathering information and suffering an imbalance of energy in its 3rd age, will explode back into energy, in the moment of ∆+1<<∆-1 entropic death.

In the graph, human existence is a travel through 3 scales of reality, the biological, cellular, individual and social scale, in which life surfaces ’3 times’ as a fetus, an individual that belongs to a society and then returns back to its simpler cellular life in death.

Existential world cycles can be written as a travel back and forth between 3 planes of social existence, the i-1, cellular, i-ndividual and i+1 social scales of the being. As an entity emerges into the relative future ‘upper potential scale of existence’ to which its individual cells are blind, a new existential ternary role is ascribed to the being, which will perform in i+1 its energetic, reproductive, and informative, social cycles. Then after death this ‘existence’ as a whole in a ‘plane of reality’ of a larger ExI (st) reality of energy and information exchanges, on a higher SpaceTime, ST+1, FADES and the being looses its information as ‘real’. The loss of information in the Universe is thus a taboo broken by GST. Information is constantly destroyed, and yet because the number of potential combinations of it is limited, it constantly re-appears in similar form. Only the ego and the mind that tries to still and stiffen information into linguistic mappings and then re-orders ∑∆-1 quantum into a larger whole, can account for the ‘persistence of memory’, of forms with genetic, quantum and memetic blue prints (biological, physical and social structures.)

**The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.**

How those planes of existence build their social planes, of space.

Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of dimensions, since Minkowski grand nonsense in conceptual thought, established departing of its useful mathematical equations of 4-vectors, the concept that time was a dimension of space.

What those 4-vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from space-time symmetries. That’s all.

The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.

Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.

All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wave-like motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given space-time symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.

Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.

This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.

4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of space-time bidimensional forms with motion.

We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.

Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on space-time can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D, Œ,Æ, non-Euclidean geometry, existential algebra and 5D metric.

In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2-manifold layers which create the ‘3^{rd} dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:

Now the growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:

it grows in pairs, often of space-time (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesian-hyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present space-time systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.

So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT TRIdimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVIN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is not-commutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.

So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an space-time plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.

We can in that ensue consider the geometry of Einstein, where time rest -c2t2, considering time ‘i’, -c2x-1 = +c2.

Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², that is ‘speed not time’.

The description of this complex plane of a space-time 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block, but it is hardly needed, as what humans are more interested on in the exchange of relative energy and information, loose terms in the verbal mode for spatial energy, or lineal planar motions and cyclical, repetitive harmonic oscillators of information, cyclical motions, hence created at least with 2 points (as 2 points in the postulate of geometry of the cycle suffice to create one).

In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3^{rd} dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œ-points’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.

So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uranium-lead crystals.

The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atoms-particles-heads of the same layers.

And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.

Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3^{rd} dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5^{th} dimension.

Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing cheng-tzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of space-time, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.

**The 5 ^{th} dimension.**

*Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

**5D Metric: co-invariance of size and time speed – the generator equation: Sp x Tƒ = C**

Now in a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time.

Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower. This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: S x T = ∆±n and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

*Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed: *Sp x Tƒ = K.*

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we shall try to give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed, Sp x Tƒ = K.

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

**10 logarithmic scales.**

To notice that the 5th dimension is based on 10 logarithms because the ‘Tetraktys’ is the most perfect group of 3 x 3 + 0 elements, which become specialised in the ‘Sp-energetic, Tƒ- informative and ST-reproductive, iterative functions of the ‘Program of survival’ of all systems, which will be made clear latter on, when we analysed the world cycles of time and the ternary Generator equation in space and time, of the fractal Universe.

You have to be a bit patient, as we have first to ground all this in some basic mathematics. Thus between 2 such scales of the 5th dimension we shall always find around 10¹¹ elements – the ties of a DNA molecule, the stars of our galaxy, the cells of a super organism, the galaxies of the perceived Universe, and between the Universal Constants of Space, we will find the same differences, the energetic value between the H-planck constant of Tƒ in the ∆-1 quantum scale and the k-Boltzmann constant of the ∆-Thermodynamic, human scale; and then the µ-magnetic scale and so on.

So this said, the 5^{th} dimension is in the holes of the real numbers each of its decametric decimal a lower scale of the 5^{th} dimension. Yet as usual those numbers should be really cut every 10 ‘decimals, because then we enter into another scale where anyway the values of constants such as Pi, and √2 vary as Lobachevski’s proved.

This is made clear just by revising a simple number, e, but a key number for the derivative, proportional emergence or descend between scales, approximately 2.718281828. to the 9^{th} decimal. The reader will observe that actually those 10 numbers form a simple series, 2.7 18 28 18 28 repetitive in extreme (except the first decimal missed by one to make it a perfect 28-18 variation, but after the 10^{th} decimal it breaks, with 2.7 18 28 18 28 45904 etc. That is, the equivalent to the loss of meaning and yet one more of the so many proofs I have found of the existence of the 5^{th} dimension, its geometries, algebras, and mind forms, circular membranes, points of view and ternary organic parts.

Indeed, e ^{x}= [(1+1/n)^{n}] ^{x} is the only derivative which is proportional to the same number, since if we take 1 the whole and n, one of its finitesimal parts, in space, a quanta, and then repeat this growth of diminution an n number of time, and an x number of social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, we shall find the emergence processes or dissolution≈ death processes of most systems of the Universe.

The quantitative scales however always yield in its meaning to the functions, and ternary symmetries we shall discover that make possible the existence of all systems as combinations of 3 ‘scales of the 5th dimension’ (quantum-cellular, thermodynamic-organic, gravitational-social), 3 synchronous topologies and 3 diachronic ages, so we soon will write the Generator Equation of Space-time Beings:

**Γ.** ∆-1: Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ∆:ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥∆+1: Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

This simple structure and all its fractal variations is essentially the description of any World-system, whose sum creates the Universe: U=∑W

Relational space-times thus have the key word ‘relational’, which merely means we need a ‘metric system’ to order and relate all those space-time cycles of the Universe.

And this is the 5^{th} dimension of the Universe: the metric laws that put and order, RELATE to each other all the time-space cycles of the Universe, of which we are all made.

**Fractal space and renormalization.**

5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sp, ST (ST) and Tƒ are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!

The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.

Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.

Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:

‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.

Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.

Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆-n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. *All scales* are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.

Thus, one of the immediate consequences of the formalism of 5D cyclical time and fractal space is to set the record straight on physics and its ill understood 3 modern ‘ideas of time’. They are further understood in terms of the arrows of future-information, past-entropy and present-reproduction and its infinite fractal cycles in 5D metric.

The reduction of the 6 motions of time to a single external translation, where time merely is used to study the change in the speed and position in space of a being in lineal fashion is NOT a truth of Nature, but a truth of artillery masters, which once formalized became a canonical formula that excluded all other time formulae.

So this locomotion, described merely with a single mathematical formula by Galileo, V=S/T, converts Time in a parameter of space, S=vt, or in Einstein’s-Minkowski’s version, S=ct. This means that as ‘things that are compared must have the same dimension and form’, Time must acquired the fundamental property of space, which is to be a lineal, open extension. And by reason of this fictitious linearity of time, to be converted into a perfect line which is an Euclidean parallel extended to infinity.

The 6 motions of times thus became a single mode of change, their cyclical clock-like form, a lineal parallel, the finite duration, an infinite lineal duration that ‘walks’ along an infinite space line. And both written in an abstract Cartesian single plane of reference, which in paper seems to extend to infinity and be unique, became the absurd concept of an infinite space-time continuum, that only exists in the imagination and the paper in which the model was drawn.

**The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.**

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:

*In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.*

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

**We are all relational space-time beings. **

*In the graph time cycles divide space into an outer and inner region, which becomes a broken piece of vital space, surrounded by the ‘membrane’ of the time cycle – a ‘space-time being’ – the fundamental entity of the Universe. So the first big discovery of analyzing the Universe with the more complex concept of cyclical times, is to realize that we are all made of broken vital spaces with motion, commanded by logic, cyclical systems of information.*

We shall state something that should be obvious but it is not, deformed by the lineal measures we make WITH time clocks: time clocks always run in cycles.

All time clocks are closed cycles, paths or knots that return to its origin, closing the cycle. And so they break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental law of knot theory and topology), creating an infinite array of cyclical membranes that close a vital space, forming the infinite beings of the universe we shall call knots of time cycles (mathematical jargons) of space-time beings (physical jargons) or species of energy and information (biological jargons).

A magnetic field acts as the membrane that protects a mass or electric field of points particles (reason why magnetic fields do NOT form monopoles, that is not their function).

That is, why time cycles will appear structurally as membranes that close a vital space and break reality into Space-time entities, of which the Universe, a puzzle, sum of those space-time beings is made.

The sum of tics of your heart gave the entire life of a human; the total number of cycles of a ball or wheel gives the lineal displacement of a car. The regular, repetitive patterns of those cycles are the origin of the so-called laws of science, which is able to predict the future of the species it studies because they do repeat their orbital time cycles, the circadian, biological cycles, their reproductive life cycles.

But as they say, the devil is in the details. So the question to start our inquire is how exactly are we made of vital space and temporal cycles?

Obviously we all exist in a finite time between conception and extinction, and we all occupy a ‘region of space’, we carry with us. And then there is always the I, of the ‘we’, the point of view to create order among all those motions and form. Let us then put the 3 together in an organic, meaningful way.

We say that time is cyclical motion/form and space is open, lineal motion/form. As this is the truth of it, physicists despite using different names have found the simplest theoretical elements of their models are open strings (of space) and cyclical strings (of time).

Yet there is a 3rd element on those Universal systems, which is by far the more interesting and less understood, which physicists of course also use in all their theories: the mathematical frame of reference, or zero point, the center of the circle, the point-particle that ‘gauges information’, without which again not a single theory of physics can be understood (it is the point of the inertial frame of reference that ‘measures’, the cause of their physical theories which are called for that reason ‘gauging field theories’).

So now we can expand our definition that ‘time is a cyclical motion and space a lineal open motion’. And affirm that:

“All what exists is a combination of open’ vital’ spaces, enclosed by membrane-like Time cycles, which are centered in a fractal particle –point that gauges and process energy and information from its relative still frame of reference’.”

**The 3 ****topologies of all Universal systems: vital spaces, cyclical membranes and o-points of measure. **

So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical ,changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):

- The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.

This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0-point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologies-functions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field. Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).

All of them will be made of:

– A central, informative point, seed, or o-point that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…

– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motions-distances that displaces the system.

This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.

Consider for example the laws of electromagnetic fields:

We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”

But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.

And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.

Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6^{th} motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian i-logic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, self-centered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:

*|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads*

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.

I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D space-time Universe and its structure.

**The goal of GST: TO EXPLAIN IT ALL AS MOTIONS IN 5D PLANES.**

IN THE DEEPEST, SENSE the unification of sciences as ‘stiences’, which study **s**pace-**t**ime, **i**nformative exist**ences, unified **by the common properties of space and time and its ¬æ logic laws of behaviour can be formalised very simply as a series of reproductive motions between scales, which often return to the same emergent scale through a swing up and down the Ξlanes of existence. 3 lanes though define a plane, 3 points define a line, and so we can grow through the postulates of i-logic geometry, from fractal points into networks of lines which are flows of energy and information to build up a new network, which surfaces as a whole through up and down, fractal reproductive waves of information:

The description of that process itself can be done from different ∆±i perspectives: depending of the scale, thus a method of mathematical populations and statistics come to the rescue of ‘big data’ (far away scale in which the number of similar beings as information diminish on them, focusing in common properties increases), while the fine-tuning perception on close range in the same ∆@ SCALE is much deep in individual analysis and breaks through in an even more fine-tuned, internal ∆-1 scale to the observance of each action and space-time cycle performed by the cellular parts or the being in its ‘fractal time’.

Whereas we mean by fractal time, the fact that time ultimately is the sum of a series of frequencies of space-time actions of ±e, i exchange and ∑>social evolution (reproduction, organisation)… So we can in fact consider each ‘world cycle a fourier transform’ which would yield in detail at least 5 different frequencies (often resumed in the observance of 3 or even 2 only), which is what the whole is made of in time. So time also ‘fusions its parts into whole new ‘pitches”, which then can be broken into informations So happens when an envelope wave comes through a series of smaller waves.

Waves organisation in that sense is perhaps in each of its two versions, cartesian and polar coordinates (as a particle then), the fundamental mode in which time ‘fragments’, space-time finite discontinuous actions, peg each other in some adjacent manner that we see a contrast of meaning and information between them.

**I. 5D SYMMETRY BETWEEN PLANES OF EXISTENCE**

The Universe is a fractal of space-time actions. This simple truth originates all its complexity.

Planck discovered the Universe is made of quanta of a substance he called ‘action’ made of energy akin to lineal motion, locomotion and time, akin to cyclical motion, repetition of a cyclical form of in-form-ation. In his equations, Action = Energy x Time, in relativity where time was a simultaneous present moment, we see it as a bit of information, Action = Energy x Information.

So we are made of motion and form, energy and time cycles, and we reproduce through time cycles forms in motion, informations. We are all just waves of reproductive information, and when we are reproduced in herds, they assembly into a larger puzzle or fractal of self-similar forms, we call a fractal super organism, and this is the game of reality, of existences of worldcycles of energy and information, of space and time, E x I st , assembled into networks, and supeorganisms, a vital biological fractal game of re= productive creation of networks that become non-Æ planes that become superorganisms:

** EXISTENTIAL ÅCTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

**Short time åctions. The mandate of existence: keep your motions going, grow and multiply against all others.**

How can this be converted into individual actions of O-beings? Simply, by the fact that all systems seem to follow this law by trying to maximise their existence, in time and space, and the 5th dimension. That is all systems try to increase their absorption and emission of energy and information, (motion and form, | and O games): ±∆E,I, and try to form part of eusocial wholes, of clone herds and organisms that maximise its survival both as individuals and species: ±∆U.

Those are the 5 space-time actions, ∂a,e,i,o,u, we observe in all beings. And we can resume them in a simple formula.

**Γ. **Generator Equation of Time-space actions: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ,

Thus time motions at individual self-level can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ.

As each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information.

**The point with parts as a knot of space-time cycles≈arrows. The fractal point of i-logic geometry.**

Now each point of view, creator of a system of reference from where knowledge can be acquired, the original model of Descartes which only claimed to create a ‘world, that of his mind that thinks therefore exists.

The Point of view also ‘ex=ists’ and that is the function that makes him think. It will think and first perceive an external Universe In this case we can consider the first action that of perception:

∂o, when the point of view perceives, then it will act in its relative ±1 available upper and downward U-sub planes of the 5^{th} dimension with both of which TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF EXISTENCE, will perceive energy and information from diametrical non-commutative directions of the metric of its particular** fifth scale: **

In the graph the 2 directions of a flow of space-time along the 5^{th} dimension, is made through small actions ∂U±4, which related the Active Magnitude, U, to a lower plane from where *Tƒ*

will obtain: ∂I, ∂e bits & quanta. AND

**∑Tƒ:** information bits start a new point of perception, which if requiring relative motion will make the Tƒ expand its lower U-1 scales:

*∂e quanta* Motion

∑**U**:quanta expanded=disintegrated by Tƒ, which modulates that expansion to move relatively to its lower scale.

We use for the concept of a space-time cyclical action, in the attempt to gather similar concepts into strings of synonymous the following names:

space-time cycles ≈ time cycles ≈ Space-time actions ≈ time arrows ≈ existential cycles/actions ≈ knots of time cycles ≈ knots of time ≈ i-logic points ≈ functions of existences

The idea as usual is to merge jargons on the range that goes from the visual description of simpler points man perceives without form or eliminating their form – physical treatment of systems in external space-time, to the range of human self-perception, in which only the inner space-time actions and existential purpose matter to us.

So when we describe the feeding motion in the gravitational field of a star we care nothing for the internal space-time actions (feeding on energy) but for the motion, and on the other extreme of the range, when we talk of the feeding of a human being, we care nothing for the fork motions that carry the food to our mouth but for the internal sensations – the need to feed and the problem of hunger, the taste of the food and our inner sensations, the transformative ‘electroweak’ forces used to change the food into an elaborated product, etc.

So the geometric description talks of space-time cycles (closed, frequency cycles) or space-time lines (motions between frequency repetitions of those cyclical actions). The jargon of actions in space and arrows of time is an intermediate jargon proper both of physical and social sciences and the existential jargon is the jargon of relational space-time that applies to all.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time cycles constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms.

And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe. In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind.

In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

**We are made of space-time cycles traced within or between planes of 5th dimension.**

In true form, reality is NOT made of space, but the primary substance is ‘time’, time cycles that break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental theorem of knots and topology), *and that precise game of cyclical forms-motions that break and organize space into vital regions, harnessing its ‘energy-motions’ into forms is all what the Universe is about.*

*Thus relational space-time turns upside down our understanding of the Universe from a mere, simple spatial description where absolute time is a parameter of space, to a cyclical description where space is a slice in the flow of cyclical times, a region surrounded by a time cycle, a ‘path’ in a ‘Lagrangian’ of actions whose final sum is always zero, if we were to use some of the advanced concepts of physics we shall translate to the new paradigm; a ‘moment of present’, in the whole cycle from past to future that closes those paths.*

For the same reason, the minimal unit of reality is NOT a string of space, but an interval of cyclical time, specifically a cyclical ‘action’ with form, a bit of information. In physics from where we have borrowed heavily conceptual and mathematical terms to describe all space-time cycles, the unit is indeed an action of energy and time, which manifests itself in the 3 main U±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanic scales, as a Planck’s action, h, a temperature vibration or a force.

In cellular biology as a circadian cycle of transformation of energy and information, from an ATP to a genetic cycle.

In organic life as an action of feeding, informing, reproducing, evolving socially, moving, ∂a,e,I,o,u.

In society as a similar economic, cultural, social or military action of a nation or civilization.

Space is thus always a ‘minimal’ part of a time cycle.

This Kepler understood when it said that a line is merely a small part (a derived tangent we could say today in calculus) of a curve. This concept, of an infinitesimal part of a longer cycle, which becomes a straight interval, is ultimately the meaning of a present point, which we derive, in the same manner we obtain a Lagrangian worldcycle that sums zero with we integrate.

** EXISTENTIAL ACTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

How we travel through scales of the 5th dimension? Through the operations of integration and derivation, which is what makes emerge in an upper scale the physical action.

Now the simplest actions of motion are derivatives of the previous scales which emerge in the higher scale. And we can talk basically of two type of operations:

∂S-4=V-3; ∂V-3=a-2 This simple chain describes the meaning of physical actions. The gravitational scale of the ∆-4 perceived as distant space, gives part of its distance by deviating it in time, emerging as speed in the light-space, atomic scale, which gives part of its speed, by emerging in the upper molecular scale as acceleration and temperature. *So physical parameters are the elements perceived in the actions that emerge between scales.*

But those are ‘pure’ actions of motion, in the spatial dimensions of those lower scales.

We though by the Galilean paradox consider the Sp duality (space perception as pure distance, motion and acceleration, or complex perception as energy).

And so we have also the e-perception of those basic actions, which accordingly is symmetric.

∂E-4=momentum(∆-3); ∂p (momentum)∆-3 = mass (∆-2).

Thus again we observe that the ultimate energy of reality (stored in the distance of strings of gravitational forces, where S≈E, that is strings energy is equivalent to its length), emerges as momentum in the atomic scale and emerges as mass in the upper scales of matter. And so we define also *the main parameters of physics related to the complex energy-mass duality (perception in detail of the components of those scales) in terms of actions.*

The derivatives are also immediate: Energy =1/2Mv², and if we derivate considering V=X, the variable, we obtain the momentum of an atomic particle: ∂x²=2x.

Thus ∂E=mv=p. And again now if we derivate mv, considering v the variable, V=X, ∂p=m.

And we associate S≈E, V≈p and a=m. As we shall see in the specific analysis f the meaning of mass, *mass is considered a vortex of accelerated gravitational form. And this is one of the many parallel ways to deduce this fact. Since ∆ST is a perfectly symmetric complex structure of a beauty, order and balance…*

**The Fractal Universe: qualitative definition.**

What is the Universe? In simple, philosophical terms, a game of ‘motion’ and ‘form’. When you look around you observe ‘*forms in motion’ performing ‘åctions’, which combine both. And nothing else.*

Now call, motion | and form O, and its combination, Ø. And so you could in the simplest possible expression of reality to say that the Universe is ∑ – x O = Ø

This would be the simplest way to define it all. Scientists tend to quantify reality and so they have shunned for too long the explanation of the ‘whys’ of reality, of ‘its qualities’. We do both in ‘philosophy of science’. Now let us try to be more precise with the previous equation.

It could be called ‘speed’, V, a motion in ‘space’, and O could be called a cycle of form, a ‘clock’ of time.

So we could now say the Universe is made of infinite motions in space and cycles of time, combined into infinite åctions. And that is indeed what we perceive. Look around you. Or inside you. Beings perform ‘åctions’ which consist in going ‘cyclically’ to a place, to feed, to inform themselves to meet with other social beings, to reproduce… Actions are cyclical and they are performed through motions, which have certain form. Desargues a mathematician proved that all curves where in fact a combination of the line and cycle that created the cone. Computers use | and O, 1s and 0s, to model the entire Universe.

And if you realize all what is needed to trans-form, a lineal motion into a cyclical clock of time, is to close the ‘string of lineal motion’ into a ‘closed string’ of temporal form. In fact with those 2 elements, open and closed strings physicists construct all the particles of the Universe.

So this is another way to explain the meaning of any System of reality:

‘All what exists in the Universe are systems made of lineal motions of space and cyclical forms of time that trans-form into each other ad eternal throughout åctions that combine both:

∑|xO=Ø’.

**Quantitative definition**

This would be the simplest possible Universe. But then we realize that the motion is not just ‘pure motion’ at least in this plane of existence in which humans develop its åctions. But there is always a ‘being’ that is moving, which from an external point of view tends to be defined by ‘a mass’, an ‘inertia’, a ‘form’ that is fixed and the motion drags through. So we rather say that:

‘All what exits are forms that perform motions with form.’

What is mass so far escapes us at this stage, but all things around us have mass and move dragging their mass, so we should get a bit more complex and consider now that all what we see are masses moving in cyclical patterns around reality. And so we can write this with 3 ‘terms’, one for ‘mass’, M, one for cyclical motion, which is quantized with a term called frequency=1/T (that is the number of times per second a cyclical motion completes its cycle), and a 3rd term called ‘space’, the space traversed in lineal terms from the initial point to the final point. So a being is a mass moving from point A to B in space and performing in time cyclical trajectories: M x L x T ‾ ¹

As it happens, physicists describe all what exists in this plane of reality with only those 3 parameters, M, L and T, and have a fundamental postulate, that the quantity of M x L x T ‾ ¹ of the Universe which they call ‘momentum’, remains invariant when we add all the momentums of all the beings of the Universe.

And so the quantitative way to express the qualitative nature of the Universe is rather simple too: The Universe is a game of ‘momentums’ in perpetual exchange of motion and form.

The reader would observe at this point that humans use a lot of ‘different’ concepts, which at the end tend to be reduced to motion and form. And this a problem of humans which love to make specific definitions, attach differentiating terms, break reality according to quantitative methods, classify, divide and confuse.

The Universe though works in a different manner, it breaks, quantizes and multiplies into:

- An infinite myriad of varieties or Ø-åctions, the 2 essential realities it is made of:
- Lineal motions that expand and create open lines and planes of space.

- And O-cyclical motions or ‘forms’, which shrink, warp and close into time clocks.

So if we want truly to understand what reality is made of. We must depart from those essential things. And called the Universe a ‘fractal’ which iterates and combines lineal motions of Space, and cyclical clocks of time into infinite åctions. We can now change from the intuitive geometric symbols to the conventions of man and so write Se (for Space) and Tƒ (for cyclical clocks of time) our equation:

Se x Tƒ = A.

And this is the simplest way to explain it.

**The combinations of motions and forms.**

What makes though the Universe so confusing is the fact that it constantly messes motion and form. And so at least in this plane of existence there is nothing ‘pure’. This the old Taoists, the philosophers of antiquity that understood in simpler closer terms this reality, calling motion yang which they represented with a ___ and form yin, which they represented with a O or a broken line — (with more form than __), make it clear, when affirming that no yin exists without a bit of yang, and no yang exists without a bit of yin, and that reality, existence was a game of combinations of yin and yang that created the infinite beings of reality.

**The o±4 plane.**

So we are obliged to use the purest terms of motion and form, only when dealing with the purest concept of pure Space without form in nature vacuum space and pure cyclical clocks of time without any translatinv motion, pure rotatory clocks, in nature, black holes in the cosmic scales and superfluid 0 K vortices of mass and charges without any vibration. And as it happens we cannot perceive those limits of pure motion without form and pure form without motion, pure Space and Time.

Now I shall call our ‘plane of existence’, where I exist. the individual, human plane, the ∆-plane. And so this remote plane which I don’t even perceive, will be called the 0±4 planes, the ∆-4 plane that of far away forces with zero form, the gravitational plane, and the plane of remote black holes with maximal form at 0 K, which I don’t perceive either the ∆+4. It is only logic to call them with the same ± number, because as it happens, the gravitational plane of absolute motion with no form (called for that reason non-local or ‘action at distance’) is created by the plane of absolute form with no motion (called for that reason a black hole).

How this is done is obvious. Remember that we said all what exists are O x | = Ø. So what happens here is this

O (black holes) emit, |, gravitational space, which other O black hole will absorb, creating between both a gravitational attractive force. So we write:

[O (Tƒ) < = > O]±4.

Where we have added the plane in which this happens to know what varieties of ‘form’ and ‘motion’ we are talking about.

The duality of distance and motion, cycle and form.

Now, because we do not see this gravitational lines and we do not see this perfect cycles, but they are there, they must appear somehow to us. And they do so, lines of pure motion are seen as ‘distances’, and cycles of pure rotational cyclical motion are seen as ‘masses’ and ‘spherical forms’. We can picture how this happens, since we have two elementary realities, the Tƒ cyclical clock (which we perceive as fixed form, like when we see a very fast turning wheel that we see as a fixed form) and the – of space, which we can see as distance or motion, as we see fast cars in a picture at night as fixed lines or motion.

This is thus an important law of reality we call the Galilean paradox: when we do not see in detail a lineal motion a speed it appears as distance, and when we do not see in detail a cyclical clock of time, a rotary motion, we see it as a mass of form. So Galileo didn’t see the motion of the Earth but only the distance it travelled around the sun, neither its rotation but only its mass-form, and yet it was there: e pur si muove e pur no muove.

So we must make two equivalences:

Lineal motion = Space distance; Rotary motion = Time Clock.

And so we see either motions, lineal speeds and rotary clocks of time, or fixed distances and forms.

And the result is the stable combination or ‘space-time’ reality we see around us.

Further on an interesting deduction of the fact we do NOT see gravitational motion, is that it must appear to us as infinite ‘non local or action at distance, as physicists call it.

Indeed, if we consider the equation of :

– x O = Øst, whereas Øst is the constant space-time we see around us. For Øst to be constant, since O the form we see is zero, none, the – element must be infinite.

As the only quantity multiplied by 0 that gives as a constant value is ∞:

∞ x 0 = C. And this is indeed what we experience: gravitational forces have zero form, and are infinite in its motion from the human perspective. We do not mean they are necessarily infinite in objective terms, but for humans they are infinite in motion, non local, ‘acting at distance’, the neat expression physicists used for centuries without reasoning why.

Now we bring this solution because I believe the reader trained in ‘quantitative’ methods will surely miss the essential element of ∆ST – to mix logic reasoning and mathematical equations to achieve a much more complex, rich and meaningful understanding of the Universe with all its languages, not only as an abstract concoction of mathematical formulae. The previous ‘sample case’ is a simple, clear proof of that power of ∆ST to enlighten our comprehension of all realities.

**The ∆-3 scale.**

So in the next stage of reality, beyond this ∆-plane of existence that we do not perceive, which we shall call, the 0±4 Plane, of pure forces of motion, ‘gravitational forces’, ∆-4, and pure form without motion, ‘cosmic black holes’ or 0±4, the rest of realities are ‘messed up’. Their motions have some form and their forms have some motion. And so they are all Ø-species. And we call them ‘waves’.

Indeed, when we come to the minimal reality we perceive, we realize it is made of pure motions which have a bit of form, that is their ‘lines of space in motion’, their gravitational lines curve up and down as they move linearly’, and they become ‘transversal waves’ of light. And then alas! they are now ‘light-space’, forms in motion, forms in action, in-form-åctions, in-form-ations. And so ‘light-space’ carries information, and it is the ‘limit of our perception’. And we call this plane of existence, which is the first we perceive the ∆-3 plane of electronic light. The beginning of the human universe. And so the myths of the bible said ‘and God said, there is light’ and creation started. Indeed, when gravitational forces of the ∆-4 scale warp into transversal waves, which carry information, or ‘light-space’, we enter reality.

This ‘light space’ in turn will be made by ∆-3 galaxies, which produce this light space.

And we call them the ∆+3 plane according to our terminology of planes of existence.

And so if we look at it from the ‘smallish’ point of view, the ∆-3 plane is made of the components of most of the matter of the galaxy: plasma particles, electrons and protons in ionized state, mixed up with electromagnetic fields of light. And from the larger point of view we will be talking of galaxies.

They are the next clear thing beyond the Universe and its dark matter, dark energy and dark black holes we do not see

Now here, we shall by ‘isomorphism’ (similarity) with the ∆-4 scale consider some facts, which have escaped for very long the work of physicists in their understanding of reality.

If we have said that the space of the ∆-4 scale is actually pure motion, seen as distance by lack of detail, the space of galaxies, must be made of light, which we do see, but not with enough detail to perceive its motion, and so we also perceive ‘light-space’ as distance. This is our ‘space’ and accordingly the space we see has exactly the same 3 perpendicular, Euclidean components that light have because both are the same:

In the graph, we can see this straightforward. It is not a coincidence that the 3 elements of light, its magnetic, electric fields and its speed are perpendicular to each other as our ‘Euclidean space is’. This physicists do not really understand, because they just do quantification with maths, and as Feynman famously put it, ‘the why’ is the only thing physicists do not ask. Curiously enough philosophers did understand, so Kant said that our space-light is Euclidean, and Descartes said we see the ‘world’ of light with Euclidean coordinates in his book ‘the world’, and draw the Cartesian space-time graph of light space. And artists understood it, so the impressionists said they paint light when they paint space. Again an important insight by using more than numbers to explain reality.

Next the equation with our geometric symbolism of this scale, will be also rather simple;

[O < ≈ > O]0±3

In simple terms, a ‘particle’ or ‘star’ or ‘galaxy’ with cyclical form O, produces a wave ≈ of light space, which another O-being will perceive and absorb. (Remember at this time we do see and all systems that emit light do perceive; your mind is nothing but a bunch of electrons perceiving light).

Remembers also that we have said the Universe has only 2 ultimate simple elements, O and – and its infinite Ø combinations, but it likes to iterate them, repeat them, mix them together, group them in huge numbers. So that equation can mean an extraordinary number of beings of different sizes. The most common interpretation when we enter in detail will be that of Physicists, which they call the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

O-Fermion particle < Boson Force > O-Fermion particle.

Where a fermion, electron or quark will emit a boson a gamma ray and another fermion will absorb it.

There are a few other varieties of ‘forces’ and ‘fermions’ but roughly speaking without entering in detail this ‘is it’. (Remember this blog has 3 ‘planes of explanation’ the upper line very general and encyclopedic, resumes the entire thing; so if you read it you will have a generic vision of the whole reality but still a bit fogged, this second line of isomorphisms, gives you more detail and the 3rd line dedicated to each plane with very detailed references to scientific laws of each species, do connect fully with simplex sciences).

- Now the second thing physicists do know but again interpret in too abstract ways, is the fact that the equation works both sides: the electron produces a boson – a photon of light that moves through a transversal wave that carries motion and form, and gets to another electron, where it collapses being absorbed by the electron into a dense photonic form, which becomes part of the nebulae of the electron.

Thus what happens here which they describe with mathematical artifacts called probabilities in quantum equations they do not know what they mean, is clear, if you are not ‘cuckoo’ about having weird interpretations of reality that make you sound very smart and reinforce your beliefs in an only-mathematical Universe. This i know will irritate physicists, people which as the adults of ‘le petit prince’ believe they know everything and don’t see the elephant in the hut. Well, Schrodinger who discovered all this, first told us that the electron is smeared all over the place. And it is. it is made of very dense boson light photons that collapse from ≈ state into O-state, and come together into the nebulae we see.

Now, when we observe them, with even bigger particles, the smeared electron, collapses further into a tighter ball, as it happens when any system of nature made of fractal points (anything is a fractal point, a number, a group of any set of beings), receives a massive interfering attack from outside. Flocks of birds, schools of fishes, armies spread on a battle field, collapse into tighter configurations when a predator eagle, a shark, an enemy come to attack them.

So the densely packed photons of the electron nebulae collapse, around the point where there is a maximal density at this moment of dense photons and become a particle point, when the killer electron of the microscope bombs it. Simple enough to explain in a perfectly intelligent manner, the weird things – not so weird if you believe in the isomorphism=equality of all systems of the universe – and have been a soldier, or have seen a school of fishes, a bird flock, a herd in the savanna, an at hill – that happen in quantum physics.

This is what it happens: nebulae of densely packed groups of photons, spread to form together ∑∆-1 photons = ∆-electrons gather around the denser point of the flock in the moment the observer’s electron bomb it, and so quantum physicists say that point is the most probable point to find the electron as a particle-point. And they are puzzled because they never detect the nebulae but a particle point, so they unable to grasp the vitality of the entire universe affirm that the nebulae is a mathematical reality made of probabilities of finding the electron. Yes, each point will have a probability according to its density, as the probability that a school, a flock, an army or an ant group gathers in a point is proportional to the density of that point prior to the attack, as it is the fastest way to become a ball, coming together where there are already a lot of points. Point.

So this is enough to know now about this plane and its equations.

Tƒ mention though that because light has information, form, it is no longer infinite in speed. It must have a limited speed, because now we see it so, O x – = Constant Øst does not need to be infinite. Further on, because what is happening here is that light ‘draws’ space-motion, as it has to draw a curve is slower. Indeed, the fastest distance between two points is a line, a wave is slower than a line, as it has a longer trajectory. So light has a limit of speed. It is called c-speed, and is huge but limited.

However, this distance-speeds of light once they abandon the galaxy, no longer are in the light-space realm so they start to elongate, becoming red waves, the ones with longer distance per wavelength, and hence they start to accelerate, which we see as an increase of space-distance, and so between galaxies space-distance grows at an accelerated rate as the light expands space, and this again physicists measure but don’t understand, it is the expansion of light space. We could say that light space dies into the gravitational strings it was made of. And so the immortal, infinite black holes and gravitational infinite distances of the Universe now warp into light which have a finite light-space speed and a finite time duration as it is born from a pure motion that warps into form and then spreads out again when abandoning the galaxy into pure motion again:

– > ≈ < – and this is a life cycle. Notice now the 2 symbols we add here which are visual also: > which means something with more distance, collapses into a point, and this is the symbol of creation of form, of formation, of in-form-ation, and on the other side < is the symbol of expansion of form into motion, or entropy.

And here again those to dynamic process of change in time, are ‘called appropriately the two arrow of time -> and <-, information and entropy. Physicists unfortunately only recognize one, the bad one, <- entropy expansive motions, which is the reason they say the Universe is dying. Because they only study the space between galaxies. It seems silly, very dumb, but physicists beyond manipulating equations and making machines to perceive reality are very dumb. Sorry that is ‘a fact’. Or rather very arrogant in their conclusions (which makes them be very dumb)

Fact is the whole Space-time, remember O x – =Øst is in perpetual balance.

So the expansion of accelerated light space between galaxies is compensated by the warping of light space into photons, then electrons and matter within galaxies, which is so evident looking at those galaxies corrugating light space into warping black holes, that one wonders how blind physicists can be?

They seem to see the only thing nobody sees, dark expanding space and they do not seem to see what all of us see, warping galaxies. And so:

∑ (O-galaxies < ≈–≈> O) is the equation for the sum of all the galaxies emitting expansive light, ≈ which becomes gravitational faster distances, – between galaxies and then reenter another galaxy and collapses.

Easy. Now you can throw in to that model all the correct equations of quantum physics, relativity and cosmology and you will get the details. The whys are only in this blog.

**Some clarifications on physical errors.**

All this brings us to the almost impossible need to correct ‘physical concepts’ which truly deform in favor of action, motion and other fundamental traits of the worldly religion of physicists (to make weapons and of late machines that use energy to move) that have transpired to all sciences.

Consider for example, my lost battle to redefine and reduce the concept of energy to entropic, lineal motion transfers.

In physics, the fundamental concept is ‘energy’, which never changes. This is its fundamental law.

For long I have tried to ‘change’ that ‘enclose-∆- all saint grail concept’ of energy, and reduce it to a mere ‘transfer’ of lineal, spatial motion, and redefine the principle as ‘lineal energy motions constantly transform into cyclical informative motions back and forth’. But I realize this has only produced rejection from physicists that have the big issue of arrogance – that is, trying to explain everything else with the specific limits of material systems. So i am into the painful, long process of rewriting every time i put ‘energy’, and substitute it for ‘entropy’, the spatial, expansive arrow of motion. To physicists in that sense all is entropy and informative life processes are called ‘negantropy’, not information, the arrow they ignore.

So they do with the ‘Reprod-Active’ 3^{rd} present arrow of repetitive åctions that combine energy, sorry entropy and information, and when repeated many times, reproduce a system. Entropy only physics, its biggest conceptual error though makes sense in external physical systems, where most changes are changes in motion in space. In this view, ‘energy’ which they basically define as a transfer of lineal motion through the formula of Work (that only takes the lineal direction in which the force is applied as the component of motion).

And there, they include also potential energy, stored in the form, or information of systems, from mass Sp=mc2, to position (in a gravitational field). Thus in physics ‘energy’ is really all, it is the existential force of the system, as it includes both its ‘kinetic energy’ (which is the concept i had failed to reduce energy to), but also ‘form’, vortices-clocks of accelerated time, charge and masses, which transform their form into ‘kinetic energy’.)

The reader of these texts therefore should forgive the author who calls ‘entropy’ energy, expansive lineal motion.

As physicists are the popes of science, we yield to them, and I will correct in the future all those terms of ‘energy’ and substitute them for entropy. And we will use the physical concept of ‘energy’ as existential force, Max. Sp X Tƒ, of a system. Which is really what they mean when they say mass is a form of energy. In true ‘form’ is not, Mass is a vortex of information, the particle state of the cosmic Universe, and energy is its opposite variety. So the reader should realize this minor error, and read ‘entropy’ when I say energy, a word I will try to eliminate.** **

**EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things though are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

**SOCIOLOGICAL SCALES**** **

**∆o**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

** ****We are an integration of space-time cyclical åctions performed across those o±4 planes of existence.**

*A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:*

*O-1, ∑O-1>Si<ST>Tƒ<<So-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.*

*If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (æ,e,ï,œ,û) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being.*

We need now to see how space-time fields, ‘lines with motion’, momentums, the commonest st manifold, either an Le (Long-energy-entropy), Tƒ, Tall Information and Wa, Wide-Reprod-active Wave bidimensional system with an spatial and temporal dimension.

Now the bidimensional ST systems follow the natural laws of topology, and are a bidimensional motion, perceived as a line of space with a speed that will define in an external field its ‘reproduction of information’ as it traces its motions in the external absolute space-time.

The simplicity of integrating a worldcycle path on those 3 bidimensional systems

Worldcycle, similar to a Hamiltonian :

- 3 W = ∫ Le x Tƒ d(st) = ∑ a = 0

Any world cycle: W, thus will transit through the existential ±,∫ æ,e,ï,œ,û, åctions of the being with different increasing length of time and space.

The motions in ∂a, accelerated, decelerated and steady state caused by the perceptive åctions, ∂I, which have perceive external cycles and accumulated it in logic thoughts to enact them in the future, are directed towards a field of energy, from where to extract bits of existential momentum to deliver forceful impulse into the future.

All this mechanical åctions though have a clear goal> Energy is always transformed into potential forms of information. Which is the new principle of internal and external energy:

Sp = External Energy (kinetic energy), internal-external energy (internal energy of the external Universe: Potential Energy) + Internal energy (vital energy and cyclical information of the being)

Is a quantity which is conserved. Since it includes angular momentum, lineal momentum, we can perceive in this manner different conservation laws of physics.

Where the worldcycle function of relative present, ∑ or W, for width-summation, will be constantly used to represent the constant steady state balanced space-time function, made of åctions

in a wide analytic equation, would give us obviously a lot of information on the system. Enough to say now that the 3 variation space-time fields are simplified by the fact that almost always Length-entropy, height-information and width-reproduction follow this harmony simplification of bidimensional space-time fields.

There are though also other inverted functions, for example, an Lo dimension, which is a cycloid, a cyclical wheel which moves along a lineal path tracing an 8 Radius longer wave cycle, combination of both.

The body wave, reproductive Past x future, energy x information, system is thus the more complex, variable and interesting of all of them.

And we could consider its worldcycle between birth and extinction, form its first beat of existence to its last, the ‘present existence’ of a being. We are bodies, our heads in the future with information are invisible particles, our limbs absorb its energy and information from the external Universe with its hyperbolic openings, but the being is its body-wave, its reproductive organ for whom the being mostly exists.

Of the 5 åctions of existence, reproduction, the preservation of the relative present is the highest of all mandates.

In existential algebra we write:

Present (angular momentum: Mvr, in physical equations, or ‘action’) = Past (energy) x Future (information), whose operational functions, of which the Hamiltonian, Lagrangian are the most relevant of physics, try to combine this anti-symmetric equation (as both are inverse functions, hence Past / Future = Constant.

Now if we are calculating past x future, whereas Past = Constant Future, P = C x F.

And we would obtain:

*Present*= Constant x Future x Future =*C F*^{2}

A fundamental equation of all time Physics.

While for Past we can calculate:

Past = C F

And obviously Future = F

It is then interesting to observe that knowing the future, measuring the future space-time point (external or internal of a being) allow us to deduce the past, and relatively consider the Present, which will be more variable (as now the future has 2 possible solutions from the present point, as there are in fact 2 possible decisions to be made in the present. That is, the present can choose to increase any of its 2 components future information or past energy.

This always-dual solution to a point of space-time or first degree of freedom increases the external uncertainty on when the point of time, will make discontinuous its cycles of space-time action, switching to another different active integral path, that might even cancel the first.

Entities thus travel through a multiple Universe with different regions with different dimensions. How travel through such 5^{th} dimensional fractal Universe filled with nested sub-universes of different symmetric past and present and future, Sp, A, O, dimensions of spacetime

The relationship between a bidimensional space field and a bidimensional time cycle, is also a 2-manifold.

However cutting each other with a single dimension of connection as they intersect in a creative wave-particle encounter, is fundamentally an A x Sp, Active magnitude x accelerating field of kinetic energy (perceived as its derivative speed by the active magnitude) : M x V – a momentum.

A second fundamental new element of cyclical time is the cyclical nature of the relative fractal past-present-future dimensions of space time, in world cycles which means that the future return to the past by means of the action of death.

Past x Future = Present-> Energy x Information -> wave-reproduction/momentum, is the kind of new quantized time equations that will be able to reveal an enormous numbers of facts and whys of science.

Now the study of that previous equation, which is the perception of the Universe, from a different time frame of reference, *as if the past and the future co-exist together in the manufacturing of present, as it actually happiness in reality, creating an immortal Universe in a perpetual present is a high discipline of physics of time.*

Since to exist through åctions that ensure the immortality of the system, by absorption and reproductive emission of energy and information is the fundamental purpose of time cycles.

Thus we shall elaborate its concept, as it is truly in the ‘åctions of space-time’ that all beings perform, where we shall find the whys of the Universe.

Thus the whys of reality are the active, biological purposes of most time cycles, performed by existential beings, whose geometric forms drawn in space are secondary to the ‘biological functional nature’ of those ‘space-time åctions’.

Since those cycles will be the 5 ‘drives of existence’ that ensure the entity:

– ∫o, perceptive, gauging, to move towards…

– ∂a: accelerated fields where

– ∂e, to feed in energy, and store it to.

≈i, reproduce and achieve immortality within

±∫u: a social stronger group.

And those topo-biological whys, performed by all kind of systems, including physical systems to ensure mechanically or vegetative its survival.The sum of all the planes of increasing information of parts that become wholes, of knots of space-time cycles that are joined by networks into systems and super organisms IS the arrow of SCALAR SPACE-TIME, or relative 5th dimension (if we consider the 4 classic ones of physics though as we shall see this is a simplistic confusing nomenklatura, better substituted by the ternary symmetries between space topology, S, time age, T, and space-time scale, ∆ which is a future time arrow ∑∆>∆+1, of eusocial evolution, of potential forms, which might or might not happen but if happening will have certain non-Æ forms that are set as the most efficient survival forms of a given ternary topology of existence.

So a being will be the sum of all the planes and super organisms, floating and occupying a limited domain of that dimension, as its internal knots trace its world cycles, sum of fractal quantum motions, or ‘∆-1 actions’ of the being in its internal space, as they transfer energy and information from the outer, ∆+1 world:

∆=∫∆±1

Whereas a being, ∆, is the sum of exchanges of energy and information between its outer world, ∆+1, and its inner world, ∑∆-1, which is what beings do through its existence: absorb and emit energy and information between its inner world and outer world.

In this experience the being will show 2 selfish arrows of accumulation of energy and information in its internal territories and at the same time trying to minimise its output of both:

Max. Spe x Tiƒ

Yet the mind, Œ≈Ø, function (in timeT: Œ and space: Ø), of the being while trying to maximise its body energy and mind information it might exchange in unfavourable conditions with larger stronger wholes, and by the simple reason that wholes are more than Is in space-time size and volume, finally loose the game of existence and loose its capacity to regenerate its energy, collapsing into death.

Min. Spe x Tiƒ: Max. Spe x O Tiƒ=Death equation.

Thus an existential cycle ends with the fall back into dissolution of the being that existed and that ultimate reality: that all existences in time are closed zero point travels between 3 planes of the 5th dimension, resumes all reality:

**Life death cycle: its 3 ages is a trip across 3 co-invariant scales of the 5th dimension**

So we talk of a 5th dimension, which orders reality according to its growing sizes, and paradoxically, slower time motions. As we grow in space we diminish in speed, and yet both properties put together are invariant:

**Λ. 5D metric:** Sp x Tƒ =Constant; Sp= K/Tƒ ; Sp (Past-energy) < Present-iteration: Sp x Tƒ>Tƒ future information;

|-Sp (energy age, field, gas, youth) > Sp x Ti (liquid, adult, wave, reproductive age)>Tƒ (3rd age, particle solid) <<Sp (death).

All systems do travel through the 5th dimension performing 3 basic motions:

- Present translations performing time actions in space, along the same Universal plane.

- Past, transfer of energy and information upwards towards higher social scales.

- And transfers of energy and information downwards.

Those 3 motions, performed in infinitesimal, indivisible cycles made of tics of time and quanta of energetic space form together a sequential world cycle of life and death – as the point is a super organism in existential mode.

And so the integration of all those motions through the world cycle, Ω, of the whole system, in a life-death duration. Yet the same structures considered in space, gave us a ternary form, or super organism, made of energetic, reproductive and informative parts. And so departing from a single Œ point, through its existential travels and synchronicities, we can tell the tale of the Universe: the creation and extinction of wholes from parts, which perform space-time actions, which are motions that exchange energy and information through the 5th dimension.

And so the motions of each point of each scale can all be traced and included in a larger frame of reference of multiple space-time symmetries.

It is though needed to understand how the arrows o information and energy emerge and download between the fractal planes of the 5th dimension. Hence we need a 3rd symmetry to fully grasp the behaviour of the species of the Universe.