**I. 5D ****SPACE-TIME**

*The fifth dimension of scalar space-time coupled with the three relative arrows of time, past entropy, future information, and its present energetic combinations, are the ‘foundational principles’ of the organic models of the fractal Universe which tends to evolve groups into tighter herds and super organisms with higher ‘social forms’ in the scales of the fifth dimension – as they survive better into the future, making the scalar dimension the absolute dimension of time of the Universe. Since as Einstein put it, the ‘separation between the past, present and future is an illusion, given the fact that death ‘erases’ all the gains of information of any system of the Universe.*

*Indeed, all biological systems become a zero sum as the world cycle of informative life and entropic death erases them back to the past. *

*And all physical systems, do the same according to Einstein’s equation, e=mc²: which must be read in terms of the three arrows as:*

*Past entropic big bang ≤Present, constant space-time light wave≥ future mass vortex of information.*

*So only the absolute arrow of the fifth dimension is an arrow of future time as:*

*Whole systems survive better in the future than parts.**For a new scale of the fifth dimension to exist, parts must come first, so wholes are into the future of its parts**A whole has more information, as it adds to that of its parts, the systems of the whole, so it is in the relative future of information.*

We shall as we study in depth the laws of the fifth dimension observe that indeed, the co-existence of fractal scales in the Universe happens *precisely because while they co-exist in the same point of space, physically and bio-logically, they are displaced in the latitude of time, from past to future, as ‘time co-exist’ in a ‘block’ that makes Einstein’s dictum a physical reality.*

It must be also understood that we practice the 3 epistemological pillars of GST: The experimental, scientific method, the correspondence principle and the GST-proper, isomorphic method, meaning any law of the Universe must *be in correspondence with classic theories and it must be applied to physical, biological an social systems equally.*

So we structure many posts with a simple scheme: 1) Epistemological Proofs 2) physical systems, 3) biological systems 4) sociological systems.

*Thus as humans change ‘mind-languages’, in each discipline, we must change the jargon of each property. So the question is what are the ‘jargons’ used to describe the fifth dimension in each of the three sub-disciplines of ‘stience’? *

*And the answer is obvious: Physical systems use mathematical metric equations to prove the existence of dimensions.*

Biological systems talk of super organisms (ab. supœrganisms, œ), as the structure that best describes a co-existing system embedded in multiple self-similar scales, all of them constructed as a whole through three physiological networks – the entropic/digestive/feeding, energetic/reproductive and informative/nervous network.

And social systems talk of ‘love’, eusocial evolution – the sharing of entropic property, energy and information among the members of the society as the ‘purpose and method’ to build new scales of the fifth dimension.

So those will be the themes of the article.

**FOREWORD: THE METHOD OF 1ST LINE**

**Foreword. ** In this first (and second) lines, we shall as we study in depth the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view , in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST: The experimental, scientific method, the correspondence principle and the GST-proper, isomorphic method, meaning any law of the Universe must *be in correspondence with classic theories and it must be applied to physical, biological an social systems equally.*

So we structure many posts with a simple scheme:

1) Epistemological Proofs, which resume in the Correspondence Principle with classic theories, experimental proofs and description of its:

- its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties of the Universe derived of its topological=
symmetry.*spatial* - its biological properties, derived of the
**5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure**of all its systems and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles - its ‘perceptive properties’
*derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of ex i=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals.*

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, *to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final non-Æ enclycopedia of GST systems*:

2) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the properties of:

3) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 and…

4) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

So for each of the key ‘elements’ of the program of informative creation (Tiƒ), energetic reproduction (ST) and entropic extinction (Spe) we shall describe in this first line, its *more abstract, logic and mathematical properties, with minimal experimental details, while the second line will be all about experimental details of those properties; and then again with far more detail and depth, the their line will explore those logic≈temporal an mathematical≈spatial properties of GST and the fourth line elaborate the blue print of a fire encyclopedia.*

As usual my apologies for the slow disorder form of construction of this web: translation from Spanish, digital copying of handwritten texts and pouring blocks to final polish – more like a diamond mining, cleaning, polishing process to finally get the shining of the organic, fractal mind of the Universe, whose brightness should enlighten future generations of huminds of Airobots, to feel the unity of all what exists

ls.

**I. SCIENTIFIC PROOFS **

**Experimental proofs**

In the graphs, the ternary scales that configure all physical systems, biological and sociological, both human and mechanical eco(nomic)systems, with ∆-1 humans/machines, ∆º, mothers, company-mothers, and ∆+1 civilisations and industrial nations.

**Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.**

*The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.Knowing the scientific, experimental details of that supœrganic structure, it marvels to see it all expressed in ‘philosophical terms’ by the likes of Cheng-tzu… Buddha, Aristotle Leibniz and Schopenhauer at different moments of history of thought. *

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:

- A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
- A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a *fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.*

In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…

*In the graph, the fractal, organic networks that structure all the space-time beings of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.*

The Universe is a fractal of spatial entropy or ‘Motion’ and temporal information or ‘Form’, if we were to use the more profound terms of philosophy of science. How a fractal NOT of digital numbers but of 2 different concepts, ‘motion’ (energy, translation in space, entropy, displacement, lineal distances, etc. will be found to be self-similar terms) and dimensional ‘form’, (time cycles, clocks, information, logic form, spherical form will be synonymous) structures its repetitive actions that allow the fractal to grow and scale up and down its forms? This is the question we shall study in depth in those posts –* the self-reproductive properties of fractal organisms.*

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.

Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar space-time, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.

In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein. Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.

In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of self-similar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of space-time. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.

Let us then prove the fractal paradigm, the true evolution of cosmology, with the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

**PHYSICAL MODELS; 5D METRIC.**

For a dimension of space-time to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while its space-time parameters remains co-invariant.

In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of Non-E Geometry:

‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).

Since it is precisely the co-invariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.

So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it in the life-death cycle of existence:

**travels through the fifth dimension, from seminal seed to the 3 arrows/ages of time-space, back to death. **

*In the graph, a visual synoptic study of the fundamental structures of the Universe created by the three arrows of time-space, which combine in infinite fractal social, biological and physical systems, constructed by the ‘bundling together’ of multiple of such timespace arrows, forming ternary structures made of entropic limbs/fields, iterative body/waves and informative particle/heads, ‘organisms’, with a finite size of vital space, made with those three organic topologies, who live a limited duration in time, as the system evolves through three ages dominated sequentially by those physiological arrows, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive age of energy, when the spatial entropy, e and temporal information, t, of the system balance each other, e=t, and finally a third age of maximal information, when the system warps and wrinkles, growing in form till exhausting all its entropic motion and hence its energy (product of both, entropy and information). At that point the system dies, as time never stops ‘moving’, so it travels locally backwards in time, exploding the system into a physical big-bang or dissolving death back to the ∆-1 scale. The study of the fractal, scalar, 3-spacetime arrows Universe of three time arrows thus will answer also the exi=st-ential questions which are the ultimate goal of knowledge.*

In the graph to order all those fractals scales of space, and cyclical structures we need a new 5th dimension of scalar space-time (ab.∆), made of different ‘decametric’ scales of spatial size, (Spe), each one carrying a different speed in its cyclical clock-like cycles of information (Tiƒ), defined by a simple metric equation: Tiƒ x Spe = constant, which allows the co-existence of different species in those scales, as the larger beings are slower than the smaller ones, so both can survive (and you cannot catch a fly:), even synchronise its time clocks and sizes, to create complex organisms extending across 3 fundamental scales, the ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, gravitational/social scales.

The co-invariance of space quanta and Nature’s time clocks, of which there are also an ∞ number of proofs, from the Moore law of faster, smaller chips, to the metabolic rates of smaller faster animals, and the vortex laws of physics, allowed the transfer of energy and information between scales, as Energy (the product of a space quanta and its frequency of time) remains invariant. So we can rephrase and fusion the 2 fundamental laws of science:

*‘The Universe constantly transform spatial entropy, Spe, into temporal clocks of information, Tiƒ: Spe<=>Tiƒ…*

* combining both into vital and Universal constants that define the structure of all space-time beings:*

**The fractal generator sum of t****he arrows of entropy and information in the scalar Universe. **

*In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time:*

*B*ecause the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain *connected organic structure are co-invariant, *it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):

*‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of space-time).’*

*That simple equation is* the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.

Yet to transform and compare two entities they must have the same dimensions, and so we adscribe in all equations to time the dimension of height-information, needed to convert a time line into a world cycle.

And so time and space are BIDIMENSIONAL and can transform into each other ad eternal into space-time mixtures, yin-formation and yang-entropy thus become ‘space-time’ energy and we can write the simplest of all formulations of the Generator equation:

S≈T (where ≈ means the wave-like present space-time mixture of both). THIS IS THE ULTIMATE equation, yes that simple. And yet *the bidimensionality of time≈information and space≈entropy, which allows the transformation of one into the other and its combination into ∞ ST≈energy beings, (as only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other), is the fundamental law of the Universe, I have ‘printed on my mind’ with the lightening of Zeus, since it is the simple, first thought of creation, which will reveal the contour of it all.*

It also mean that time is bidimensional (rhythm or ‘frequency’ and height, the first being the pure dimension of time, the second of ‘perceptive information’ – and we shall see to the amazement of physicist, that indeed, the particle is always on top or ahead of the wave-body that moves it). Yet now because time is bidimensional, IT FOLLOWS, that it can be transformed into space. S<=>T, which is the ultimate formula of the universe.

Let us then explore this concept, which is essential to reality in all sciences., *as only beings with the same dimensions can transform into each other. *

Indeed, consider for example, the rewriting of Einstein’s equations, which is immediate. He took time to be an imaginary fourth spacetime coordinate ict, where c is the speed of light and i is the imaginary unit. Now we write: *ds² = (dx, dz) (dy – i**cdt).*

And so time-like functions will become the stuff of the ‘imaginary’ number world, ever pervading in all physical studies of space-time events. And while the equations will be the same the interpretation of this mathematical insight are many. I.e. in the field of quantum physics, immediately we realise its main ‘generator equation’, Schrodinger’s equation can be written as Broglie->Bohm did in polar, imaginary coordinates; *and it will define the particle-state of the quantum system, its cyclical, informative nature.*

The first connection between algebra and physics is the use of the same operandi, but what kind of variables are translations of the pure functions of time and space in GST to physical equivalents. Frequency, 1/t, is the immediate one-dimensional translation of time. Moreover, frequency can be synoptically limited to a ‘point-mind’ of information – a simplex language equations; as frequency taken on a single point of each translative space-time cycle, reduces further the total information of the being to a discrete serie of numbers.

__The scales and ST¡ences of reality.__

As the widest one is the concept of a topological network-plane, of the 5^{th} dimension we can consider it in more detail.

All Sciences share the isomorphisms of duality and organicism. Since the forms of energy and information and its properties remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe, described in the next graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of time and events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes. Yet the proportion of energy and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (with minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity).

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, *which *define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Sciences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe absorb energy, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

The universe is a scalar social organisms that grows in scales of 10 elements. This growth of new ‘scales of space-time’ IS THE ARROW OF absolute future of reality. Since those who evolve together from individuals into social organisms survive better and dominate its ecosystem, in all scales of size and form of reality. So in biological terms the 5th dimension of eusocial love to ALL the members of your own species (regardless of structure and work-division, into neuronal informative people, and working reproductive ones, to form the ‘mind and body of the system’) IS THE DIMENSION OF FUTURE.

But logically it is ALSO the dimension of future, since ‘parts’ MUST be created BEFORE wholes. So the past is the lonely particle, neanderthal ‘violent’ (partially) white man, AND THE FUTURE, is NOT the homo bacteria or ‘animetal’, in the jargon of bio-history, which betrays all other human beings of its species with segregational memes and loves mechanisms, weapons and go(l)d more than the wor(l)d of love, the biological mandate, the future of its species. Finally it is also the future mathematically and experimentally, as it is obvious the Universe (or the galaxy in more humble studies of the big-bang) started in a sea of entropy that evolved into social scales, as particles became atoms, molecules, cells, crystals, planets, ecosystems of super organisms, galaxies… ALL GUIDED BY THE SUPREME PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE, love all those who belong to your species, work together, create a larger whole and control your entropic territory with it:

In the graph, we can see the ultimate goal of the Universe, the creation of fractal super organisms in which species and individuals who talk the same language of information evolve a larger whole. While *those who don’t understand the Mind of the Universe, the true meaning of God, and the fractal minds of all its species which explain the same concept in each language, the gods of verbal love of the human super organism perish.*

Finally mathematically the fifth dimension is proved by the so called ‘metric’ of a mathematical dimension, which according to Klein exists, when we can *travel through the dimension with the space-time parameters remaining invariant.*

And this is the case of all motions through scales of the fifth dimension, the most notably being ‘the world cycle of life and death, as we are born in the lower seminal scale, with small space-size (Ab. Se) and fast time cycles (ab. Ti) but as we grow in size (+∆Spe), our clocks of time decelerate (-∆T) AND SO its capacity to carry in’form’ation stored in the cyclical ‘form’ and frequency of those cycles (so a computer which is complex clock measures its info in frequency gigahertzs).

SO THE PRODUCT OF Space size and time speed: S x T and the product of the spatial energy stored in that vital space and the information of its clocks e x i, REMAINS INVARIANT, PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE 5TH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE, EXPERIMENTALLY, mathematically, biologically, and in mystical terms.

**Metric-mathematical and empirical, organic Proofs of the fractal 5D Universe.**

Indeed, what are then the formal proofs of the existence of a 5th dimension of scalar space-time (ab.∆§) ?

In more strict terms, according to epistemology we need *experimental science and a mathematical ‘metric’ equation that describes the dimension. *

Experimental proofs: Everything that you see and exists is a proof of the 5th dimension, *since there is nothing on the Universe, which is not made of smaller ‘parts’ (∆-1 lower scale), and part itself of a larger ‘world’ (∆+1)*

*In the graph, we see how all systems are made of fractal networks of energy and information, which form wholes departing from smaller ‘points’, creating fractal organisms in all sciences. in the left the creation of a hierarchical, fifth dimension of future ‘timespace’ (boson state of matter)*

Mathematical proof: According to Klein, a dimension of space-time exists, when we can travel through its space and time coordinates, whose product remains invariant: “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a spacetime, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”

So what remains invariant in the 5th dimension when we travel through it up and down those scales during our ‘world cycles of life and death’ (as all systems are born in an ∆-1 ‘seminal scale’ of pure information, emerge into an ∆-scale at birth and become part of the larger world, or ‘whole’ ∆+1). Amazingly as it seems despite the enormous transformations systems go through when ‘travelling through its life-death world cycle’ through the scales of the 5th dimension, *the product of its size in space and ‘speed of time-clocks/processing of information’, remains the same:*

5D metric equation:* Se (size in space) x To (cyclical time clocks) ≈ Constant.*

In the graph, we can classify all those sciences and its species according to two parameters of space and time: its lineal size, and the inverse speed of its ‘cyclical clocks of information’. So larger species turn slower its time cycles. Yet for entire families of species the product of both parameters remains co-invariant.

Since mathematicians define a new dimension of space-time as a geometry that remains invariant when we change its space-time parameters, *it is then evident that all systems have an internal ‘scalar dimension’ that structures its smaller, faster parts and its larger wholes. *

Depending on which system we study across how many scales, we shall find different quantitative measures of the previous metric equation, which might vary in the details, but the fundamental characteristic of it, the inverse arrows of growing information and diminishing size, which balance each other, will hold for absolutely all the entities of the Universe. And so this metric equation is of an enormous importance to understand the relationship between those scales that happen in all the organisms and complex systems of reality.

In the graph, we can see the FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, or metric equation of the fifth dimension, which ensures the survival of social wholes and the extinction of those who are selfish individuals that do not evolve or hate other members of its own species.

**CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE**

**The Historic Precedents: Relational space-time.**

The Universe is a fractal of two combined motions with form, |-Space and O-Time, which transform into each other ad eternal.

This simple sentence, which encodes the meaning of all realities is how any text on science should start.

Or shall we say ‘stiences’, as all what stiences study are systems made of vital spaces, closed by time cycles?

Science though ignores this first principle that rules and explains the principles of all ‘stiences’.

Those whys were ruined from the beginning when science adopted a single clock of time.

And dedicated all the effort not to find the whys of the motions and cycles it saw, but to measure them, to find their hows.

The choice of a model of ‘space and time’ to use in scientific measures changed the paradigm from a Universe made of infinite time cycles, into one with a single human clock, with the beat of our heart-eye-thought of a second, to which all other time cycles, were equalized. This allowed the finding of an enormous number of regularities or laws of science, as we could make good measures.

But as time went by the deeper meaning of time cycles, of clocks of time that store the information of the Universe in the frequency and speed of those cycles was lost.

And since ‘time cycles’ and the space-time åctions they perform, encode the whys and meanings of the Universe, those meanings were lost. Leibniz, Darwin, Hegel, Quantum and Relativity pioneers toyed with the idea of formalizing such a model of cyclical time, but as Einstein put it, Leibniz is right but to adapt science to his mode of relational space-time, we must rebuild science from its beginnings.

This need, is very real, as the models of absolute space-time are exhausted and introduce clear errors on physical theories, and fog the whys of the Universe.

But as it happened with previous r=evolutions of thought regarding the ultimate principles of space-time (Copernican revolution, Darwinian revolution, etc.) it will take a long time to happen, as the praxis of measure which sustains our industrial civilization does not need those whys.

It will though happen if humans want to keep evolving their mind and understanding of the whys of the Universe. And this site will be the origin of it, despite its obscurity. Since it is the first ‘point of future information’ that has landed in this present point of knowledge.

In that regard, science has been corrupted in its ultimate ‘quest’ for the whys of the Universe by its own success in a rather more pedestrian task, to find the laws of measure and equations of motion in space and time, the hows of reality. This shallow description of motions in an external world today is often confused with absolute knowledge. It is not. Because while we know we move in space and time, we have yet to solve what time and space is in its deepest sense.

Science will not be completed till we know the whys of those motions of space and time; and specially the whys of existence in space and time.

Since motion is not all what we need to know about beings. Physical analysis of reality often confuses the description of motions with the purpose of knowledge, and stops when that description is complete. But why motion exist, and why beings exist, are created, evolve and become destroyed in life-death ‘worldcycles’? There is there a ‘function of existence’? A mathematical expression of the processes of creation and destruction in the Universe which can be applied to all beings?

That is the fundamental question about reality and the ultimate quest of a full science of knowledge – to discover and analyze the function of existence and extinction of space-time beings.

If in the first post of this web on relational, scalar space-time we study those space-time beings from an external objective perspective, in this post we shall concentrate in their function of existence, the space-time metric equations which describe their existence, their birth and extinction, their creation, their åctions in time and space…

Since this word, ‘existence’, closely related to the life-death worldcycle of all systems of the Universe that are born live and become extinguished with similar patterns, is the key to those whys, which the abstractions of science often forget.

The whys of ‘existence’ are related to the fundamental meaning of concepts such as space, time, line, cycle, motion, form, evolution, extinction, life, death, and so on. Science today has bypassed his problem, merely ignoring those questions. They why – said infamously Feynman – is the only question physicists should not make.

Philosophers then work aside physicists in those whys, unconnected to the hows of physics and hard science. And both remain incomplete. There is however another avenue which merges both quantitative and qualitative, mathematical and logic, philosophical analysis.

This alternative model, started by the fathers of the western tradition, Plato and Aristotle, forgotten with the arrival of mechanisms, clocks that measure time and telescopes and microscopes that see space, better than humans do with temporal words and eyes, was resurrected by Leibniz, with his relational model of space-time.

He affirmed that reality is made of vital spaces that perform time cycles and are all connected into a complex whole. Leibniz though was primarily a mathematician (who discovered calculus, the binary system of numbers and developed the first computers). So he truly was looking for a ‘whole’ explanations that included whys and hows. His model was called ‘relational space-time’ and this web completes it.

The Universe is a fractal made of systems of relational space-time. We all, and all our parts are made of those 2 universal, inverse substances: a vital space, possessing motion and energy; and a series of clocks of cyclical time, which store information in the form and frequency of its cycles.

When we say ‘I don’t have enough energy and time to do this’, we are explaining the essence of existence: to be made of topologic, vital spaces, living organs with the capacity to have motion and convert energy into work, which perform repetitive ≈ cyclical åctions in time guided by a temporal system, our brain that carries its survival information in the frequency and form of its neuronal cycles.

And the same concept can be applied to all physical systems, which are defined by the complementary principle of quantum physics, as particle of temporal information that move as waves of energy over a physical field of space.

Or to complex mechanical systems, made of a platform machine, its relative space, directed by time cycles encoded in computer algorithms.

So we can consider indeed that all systems of the Universe are composed of a vital wave/body/platform that moves and occupies space, guided by temporal cycle of information (particles/heads/digital computers).

And define the Universe as a fractal system made of infinite of such systems, which relate to each other through exchanges of energy and information performed by those body/waves of energy and particles/heads of temporal information.

This description of human beings and any other species of the Universe, as systems made of vital spaces with motion that perform time cycles of finite duration is called a model of relational space-time.

Relational Space-times is the philosophy of science and mathematical model of the Universe Leibniz proposed as an alternative to Newton’s simplistic model of absolute space-time.

Because it was a more complex model than Newton’s single space-time, Leibniz could not formalize it.

So practical science used Newtonian absolute space-time, which simplified measures, for centuries. And science lost in its understanding of the whys of the Universe understanding what it won in precision of measure. Meanwhile Leibniz offered some fascinating insights on the whys of the Universe and the future of science in his ‘Letters to Clarke’ and ‘Monadology’.

Next after Leibniz quantum and Relativity’s revolution validated Leibniz. Quantum had proved that space had motions and was broken in quanta, with entropic, |-Motion, which could give birth to cyclical particles. So there was not an absolute space.

Then Einstein found time cycles moved at different species. So he said that ‘Leibniz was right’ but if we have to adapt his model ‘we have to restart science from the scratch’. Indeed, we must truly restart our philosophy of science from the beginning, specially our anthropomorphic understanding of reality. We are regaining those whys, sourly needed now that precision in science is overwhelming and understanding is lagging far behind.

**U=∞ ∆º±i: **

**Leibniz vs. Newton. The key to unveil the whys of the Universe: relational space-times.**

The theoretical duality of absolute external space-time of measure vs. internal vital spaces and time cycles had two clear authors at the beginning of modern science:

On one side, Newton proposed with Descartes absolute space-time and the Cartesian graph with a lineal time duration and infinite continuous space, or background space-time frame of reference to measure reality. This was useful and it was accepted to do praxis in science.

On the other side, Leibniz who cared more for the whys, found Absolute space-time faulty and proposed a theory of relational time and space, in which time cycles were of different duration, and only humans by putting them sequentially created an absolute time. While space was fractal and absolute space the sum of all those vital spaces.

Beings thus did not occupy a space but were space, and did not live in a background time but lived a finite number of time cycles.

So Leibniz co-founder of calculus, disagreed with Newton (who soon used his power to destroyed his reputation). Undaunted Leibniz affirmed that there were infinite time cycles measured by infinite clocks and beings were made of time cycles and vital spaces, which could be enlarged to observe infinite other, internal vital spaces. So each ‘point was a world in itself’, and abstract, absolute space and time, merely the ‘pegging’ or ‘sum’ of all those time cycles and vital spaces.

This model, which was far more true to the structure of reality however had a great difficulty for measures, as without a ‘frame of reference’ and a ‘clock’ to equalize all other cycles, it was difficult to order them.

Soon the industrial r=evolution, which required exact measures of space distances to construct fitting machines and of time cycles to run properly all the clocks of train stations did away with any epistemological analysis of time and space. Each city then had its own time cycle and time clocks, but railroads needed to unify them and so a single time clock was imposed globally. Machines had to be all equal, so a single space imposed its measures.

And humans completely forgot the obvious: each species had its own time clocks, occupied its own vital space, and all of them were different in length, speed, information, energy, concepts which were never properly defined, since without a clear understanding of the two elements that created all systems, all organisms, all worlds, all realities, lineal, spatial speeds, Sp and cyclical temporal clocks, Tƒ, it was impossible to explain properly the combined magnitudes and meaning of all other elements of physical and biological sciences.

And this is still the stage of Science: an astounding perfection in the description and measure of the events and forms of time and space, without any encompassing, explanative model of the whole, which was buried in the work of Leibniz, demonized in the Anglo-Saxon world by the revengeful Newton who hated the man, who was above him in the comprehension of the Universe.

When the Master of Leibniz, George of the House of Brunswick, became king of England, Leibniz was left behind, as Newton lobbied against him. Had Leibniz arrived to London, perhaps the future of science would have been a different one. But he died alone, poor and ignored and relational space-time, the true theory of the Universe was ignored for centuries. And this simple definition of reality:

‘The Universe is a fractal of complementary systems of space-time.’

…Never made it into the halls of science.

**II. BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. **

**A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF INFINITE, TERNARY SPACE-TIME ORGANISMS**

** The 5th dimension of scalar space-time puts together 3 co-existing planes of the super organism.**

**The 3 principles of a T.Œ: duality of space-time, åctions and 5 Dimensional planes.**

** **

*In the graph, the 3 basic isomorphisms of all Universal organisms, which display 3 bidimensional space-time parts, the toroid entropic limbs/fields that imprinted by cycles of temporal information stored in heads/particles, Tƒ, combine in bodies and waves that iterate the system: Thus all systems have a spatial, topological assembly of 3 organic parts, that will exist causally 3 ages of evolution of its forms through those 3 topologies, and will in the process establish a series of åctions in time, combination of their vital energy and information with the ‘complex world of U±4 planes of existence around it.*

*Now the function of existence is a different ‘equation’ and ‘concept’ and ‘system’ in the Universe, and that is the beauty and complexity of it: a simple structure, a series of cycles of time, imprinted over an energy body/wave field, which ‘moves’ through a larger space-time world, in which it exchanges quanta of energy and bits of information, can have an infinity of varieties.*

*And this is due to the 3 ^{rd} fundamental characteristic of the Universe: to be made of smaller parts that organize themselves into bigger wholes, that is to be part of a scalar reality of multiple space-time fields of different size in its quanta of energy and bits of information.*

A true Theory Of Everything, beyond the limited scope of the Unification Theories of physicists, which at best attempt to unify the 4 fields of energy of physical systems, requires to understand the 3 Unifying Principles derived from the 3 elements of all Realities, Internal, Vital Space, Cyclical Times and the fractal, isomorphic planes of Space-time that form together the 5^{th} dimension, in which all those space-time beings co-exist:

__The Duality and Inverse properties of Lineal Space and Cyclical Time.__

That all systems co-existing in a given scale of reality are made of time cycles, which enclose a certain ‘vital space with motion and energy’ (Jordan theorem – a closed curve encloses a space), and hence break the absolute space-time into infinite fractal parts, which share similar properties, natural to the essence of ‘lineal, open spatial motions’ vs. cyclical closed clock motions. Thus a T.œ. will be always based in the properties of the 2 inverse formal motions of reality, closed time cycles vs. lineal space motions, from closed and open strings to, closed, inward vortices of mass/quarks vs. open, expansive electrons; from energetic males to informative, reproductive females; from lineal momentum to angular momentum. Thus we must depart from a thorough exploration of this duality and its properties to build up the inverse symmetries of reality.

Now this duality has an enormous number of different perspectives. And the most important is the relationship between time cycles and information encoded in the form and frequency of those cycles, on one side, and space and energy, stored in the microscopic ‘quanta’ that creates a given space, defined mathematically as a surface of ‘non-Euclidean fractal points’, which create the illusion of a continuous medium given its smallness. So water seems a continuous volume but it is made of atoms, air of molecules and vacuum space, we shall see is also likely composed of magnetic constants and/or strings.

__The 5 Actions of Space-time of all Survival Systems.__

Because systems are made of 3 parameters, space, time and its scales, there are only 5 possible åctions: internal and external space and time absorption and emission, and aggregation of similar parts into wholes of higher scales or disintegration of wholes into parts.

And so this 5 ‘åctions of existence’ , changes in motions ∆a or ∂a (accelerations), ∆e-nergy, ∆observer’s perception, i-teration in an offspring ∆u-niversals, become the program of existence, the unifying will of survival, the time events we see in all systems of Nature, the ∂ æ,e,ï,œ,û of reality. We have written it as ∆e or in mathematical equations as ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û) because often, specially in mathematical physics, we will be able to express this program in terms of mathematical equations and physical laws.

Now it doesn’t matter that those 4 essential åctions of existence are coded by logic cycles imprinted geometrically in a chip, by biological, circadian cycles, imprinted in neuronal cycles, by 5 genetic letters in biological systems, or by 4+i quantum numbers, each one coding, one of those existential åctions for particles.

What matters is the unifying power of those 5 åctions of existence define a survival, automatic program that makes ‘immortal’ through repetitive generations the species that follow them.

So we could consider a function of existence that resumes the internal space and time of the system, called ‘momentum’, which is the ‘quantity’ that physical systems try to preserve and increase, mv (for systems on our scale of reality) intensity (for electric flows) and so on, which embodies the internal time clocks of the material system (q or m, charges and masses which are cyclical vortices of electronic and gravitational forces x its lineal speed, v).

__The Scalar planes of space-time of the 5__^{th}

But we need not only to understand what all those systems have in common (their space-time substance and the space-time åctions they perform to survive) but to classify their differences. That is, paraphrasing Einstein, not only to understand ‘the thoughts of god’, but its details. How can then classify all those internal clocks of time and fractal, vital spaces, broken by those cycles to instill some order on the infinite variety of the Universe.

The key is the 5^{th} of those åctions, social ‘evolution. The last of those letters, the u of Universals, the social evolution of parts into wholes defines the absolute space-time arrow, as particles gather into atoms that gather into molecules, cells and states of matter, organisms and celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond, in a series of ‘Universal planes of growing social organization, which follow certain clear rules of social evolution.

We call the sum of all those social wholes of growing size, __the 5__^{th}__ dimension of the Universe.__ Since they seem to occupy the same space-time. Indeed, you are a whole, but you have cells and atoms. How they all those system co-exist? This conundrum of all sciences, how wholes and parts co-exist, how particles are also waves, what is the relationship between quantum atoms and whole galaxies? Etc. is the theme of the 5^{th} dimension, which studies the laws of co-existence of different ‘planes of space-time’. And again we will be able to mathematize but also understand in organic, biological terms, such ‘multiple planes of existence’.

2 elements will be the key to this organization: Systems perform their åctions across those planes. So systems feed in smaller parts. Systems accumulate information in cellular micro-particles. Systems transfer energy and information between its relative planes of different size and information.

And all those systems form together a ‘5th scalar dimension’, whose metric (laws of organization), ARE the mathematical and logic tool that will allow us to organize all those fractal cycles and vital spaces in a meaningful manner, to understand its 3 fundamental properties: organic, biological survival properties, geometric, mathematical properties, and causal temporal properties. Since, as we grow in spatial size, our time cycles become slower. So rats have faster metabolisms than elephants, black holes turn faster than bigger stars, Kepler’s laws show that smaller orbits of planets are faster, vortices show that closer to its center, they run faster, chips process faster information the smaller they are, genetic clocks process faster and accumulate more information than larger bodies etc.

- All together the 3 formal elements of scalar space-time, can be generated by a fractal generator whose existential algebra, and partial equations define the
__10 isomorphisms__of the Universe, which allow us to study in great detail each of the varieties of the fractal generator, what we call a species of reality along the different scales of the 5^{th}

And so we need to conclude the study of the Universe with a philosophical understanding of the organic nature of the __pantheist, sentient Universe__, whose bio-topo-logic isomorphisms are closer to the philosophical worldview of Eastern culture than to the abstract, Abrahamic, anthropomorphic, subconscious philosophy origin of the western way of doing science.

Lao, Buddha, Aristotle, Leibniz, those are the masters, which understood that mathematics, biology and metaphysics go all together.

But we now have to go well beyond them, creating a logic and formal structure for relational fractal space-time cycles of the same strict accuracy and infinitely.

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.

That is, *all space-time events from the perspective of knowledge, of scientific information, starts with an observer’s points of view, an act of information from a zero-point, o, ∆ï. The point perceives normally a form or external motion which interests it, and feels attracted or detracted from contact. It might be argued that the motion started before the observer. But we do have a scientific, informative point of view. Thus it is more proper than the O-bserver comes first with its observation of a cycle of space-time, which through a medium that transfers information and motion, a wave therefore of ExI, he observes.*

*This ∆ï then might end there or go further into the next action, an acceleration, that is a change of direction or speed in the entity of existence. ∆a.*

*Which depending on the predator-prey-clone (energetic bigger or smaller form, or parallel form with whom to communicate) it will imply 3 different type of motions:*

*– Away from the predator or closer to the prey (which however now might enter into the game and establish a dual play, where relative motions interplay).*

*– Parallel to its clone to start communication at fixed R-distance… which might establish a certain angular momentum or tension force.*

*Let us consider the most likely action, which will be one of positive or negative exchange of energy, ±∆Sp, feeding or being food. Once a certain number of such åctions are created along some of increase of information and perception, in parallel with a sexual clone, then we move to the immortal strategy of the game:*

*∆œ: iteration of individuals, reproduction of information. Indeed, if we have gone properly through an ∆EI, a dual exchange of energy and information, that information internal to the individual might iterate reproduce into a new being. We prefer the term iteration as it is the mathematical concept of fractal theory: generator equations of fractal iterate in feedback processes the functional (the function of existence in this case) of the being.*

*And then, because ∆œ will be in the ∆-1 scale and then after its emergence, an individual of a social ∆+1 scale, there will be naturally social evolution or devolution in the U+1 scale, which ends with the death of the system, its descent to the U-1->-2 scale as it becomes erased*

Now the reader will be surprised that we use a metaphysical term, ‘existence’, but it is proper of a theory which tries to explain the ultimate whys of reality which can be resumed in a simple wording:

‘why things exist and cease to exist and then are repeated in new generations to cease to exist, across time. What is the meaning of that ‘worldcycle’ of existence that all beings follow?

* The function of existence describes any ‘system’ in the Universe – and that is the beauty of it – as a simple structure, a series of cycles of time, imprinted over an energy body/wave field, which ‘moves’ through a larger space-time world, in which it exchanges quanta of energy and bits of information, can have an infinity of varieties.*

**How to describe formally the parameters of space and time of a system. Speed, density and existence.**

Now the first question to answer is what are the parameters we use to study the vital space and cyclical time of a being. The answer is not immediate, because of the degree of detail, of the qualitative vs. quantitative description of the multiple ∆-scales in which an organism exists, etc. etc.

We thus shall talk of a ‘Function of Existence’ , which would be the function of space and time of a being. Such function of existence can be described in many ways. And as we go deeper into the understanding of the structure of a system, we shall see new ‘properties’ of those vital space and times.

Yet at first sight from a purely physical perspective

*And the equation we search for, is a fractal generator, simple equation that relates space and time, and hence is the origin of all systems – the inverse properties of space and time, which however seek for a balance, in its complementary systems, which bring 2 contradictory tendencies:*

TO/se=Constant of density SE x to = Constant of speed

Which are the 2 compound fundamental parameters/magnitudes to measure the Informative and Spatial ‘existential momentum’ of a system, and as such are defined in all of them.

We call those relationships, or any other system of equations that define the vital space and cyclical time of a system, the function of existence of the space-time being.

And it is the departure equation for all systems.

Indeed, what we call density it is related to the informative density of numbers, points of view, quanta, active magnitude, that is, the number of equal U_{∆-1} elements of the system per unit of volume, which measures the force of the system compared to any other entity moving in the ∆ Plane of Space-time.

While speed, measure in terms of quanta of space (wavelengths) and Steps of the System (Limbs/field steps) or frequency, v, measures essentially the speed at which such Tƒ/Sp= ST displaces itself or its åctions/waves of energy and information across the U∆ plane.

Consider the case of the U±3 light space-time Universe in which we humans mostly exist. Here the constant of speed is the light constant and it is easy to relate its Universal Equation, Sp x Tƒ with the Maxwell equation of the speed of light. But what is the constant of density of that Universal/Galactic reality? It depends on what kind of ‘Œ’ points co-existing in that Universe we talk of.

If our ‘phase space’ is that of life brains, for example, this constant refers to the density of neurons and its total counting in a living being, and so the active magnitude Œ will be number of neurons.

If our ‘phase space’ is gravitational space, the active magnitude is mass and the constant of density classifies perfectly almost all physical systems from gas to solid and ultra solid boson states of quark stars.

Thus the constant of speed we use here refers to an external motion and the constant of density to the internal space.

What is though the constant of speed of the internal being and the constant of density of the light-space Universe? The second is a key question of cosmology that we shall treat and correct in its specific posts. The first one, again is worth to study in more detail.

Human constant of speed is NOT the speed of light, obviously, but the mean clock of our systems, which happens to be a second, the thought beat, the heart beat and the eye beat. Thus all the key systems of the human being tick to the same clock, which happens to be the clock of the Universe, from the human point of view.

We thus talk of a Uo, that is the human clock of reference, as the center of the inertial frame of references humans use to acquire knowledge with their mind.

From this Uo, however spaces of larger/smaller size and times of faster/slower clocks do exist.

And so we have to define the system at least through U±1 Universal planes, the cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, gravitational/social Planes of existence (biological/physical jargons).

And so the density of the ‘Active Œ’ and its capacity to move and reproduce and interact in its plane of existence, become 2 initial variables, which express mathematically the ‘purpose of existence’, to move, absorb and emit energy and information, and reproduce your form, organizing yourself into bigger Tƒ∆+1.

*And this is due to the 3 ^{rd} fundamental characteristic of the Universe: to be made of smaller parts that organize themselves into bigger wholes, that is to be part of a scalar reality of multiple space-time fields of different size in its quanta of energy and bits of information.*

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.** **

**THE PANTHEIST UNIVERSE: EXISTENTIAL FUNCTIONS. THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF SCALAR SPACE-TIME.**

**Theme:** We introduce the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe. We will merely enunciate them, and then study each one in more detail in its different ‘names’ (click in the above 2nd line).

**The Existential Function: Œi**

The function that maximizes åctions of existence is the world cycle with its perfect Hamiltonian solutions of 3 dimensions that become a zero sum, slowly raising information in a cyclical vortex of higher time frequency and then exploding in no time, into pure energy, lowering two scales.

**We could IN THAT **sense consider the Universe a game of worldcycles. Points that from an upper perspective are nothing but motions, momentum of a diminutive force, but within themselves, they are full universes:

I=∆-1. That is any infinitesimal of ∆+1 is an infinite of ∆-1, from the lower perspective of its Universal Planes.

**Scalar åctions of space-time: to exist**

The metric of the 5^{th} dimension has infinite applications, specially when we relate them to the åctions of space-time, which happen precisely as exchanges of energy and information within different scales of the 5^{th} dimension, hence with different speeds in its frequency according to the ‘speed’ of the 5D scale from where the system absorbs it’s æ,e,ï,œ,û elements. Such as the ‘frequency steps’ of each action increases when the U, scale from where the action ‘quantum bit’ is taken.

Thus since motions relates to the absorption and emission of quanta from the smallest, gravitation/string fields ∂a≈∆U±4, its action are so constant that seem continuous.

Then information, absorbs bits from the electromagnetic, first perceptive scale, and its åctions are very fast, in the human case gathered in seconds of thought: ∂o ≈∆U±3.

Next comes feeding, which in humans is daily, fine-tuned to the rotation of the larger Earth, or absolute Space-time World of living beings (broken according to the ternary principle of differentiation often in 3 meals): ∂e≈∆U±2

Reproduction comes next, which is fine-tuned to the larger Sun’s orbits, or absolute space-time world of the Earth, and tends to be yearly.

And finally the social evolution, ∂u, is the generational cycle, as it lasts the entire life of the being.

This lead us to the study of a fundamental branch of relational space-time åctions, the very same meaning of the world ‘relational’: the synchronization of the different speeds of space-time cycles according to size, which organizes the entire Universe as a cosmic harmony of infinite relational time-cycles.

The harmony of the Universe is the webbing of infinite synchronous space-time cycles of different scales of the 5^{th} dimension, which put together create complex organisms across U±1 internal space-time scales and U±≥2 external quanta-bit scales (from where ∂e, ∂i, ∂a bits are extracted)

The synchronicity of such åctions of space-time that web complex organisms and systems, in which the different speeds of those cycles act in symbiosis.

Let us consider an example. Cells with faster cycles reproduce – a slow frequency action – everyday according to the daily feeding – a faster cycle – of the larger being, which is slower in its cycles, such as: ∂o x T∆-1≈∂e x Tƒ.

The previous equation of ‘existential algebra’, the study of cyclical åctions of space-time merely states that the frequency of a reproductive, ∂o, cycle of a cell of a lower scale of Size, ∆-1, T∆-1 is proportional to the frequency of a faster, ∂e, feeding cycle of a slower Tƒ system.

It is thus the task of relational space-time through the study of its space-time dualities, ∆-topologies, cyclical time ages and worldcycles and repetitive åctions of existence in space-time to classify them all, to know the details proportions and constants which define all the species of the pantheist Universe.

And to that aim, the main classification system is that of the åctions any form will develop in order to survive and hence exist in that Universe, which complete our overview of relational space-time.

Systems can only move in external space (∆a), absorb that external, lineal space as energy stored for future motions (∆e: storing of potential energy and transformation into kinetic energy); and again they can perceive the form, the information of external time cycles (∆ï) and reproduce their internal cyclical forms of time (∆œ). And finally they can gather ‘parts of internal space-time’ into wholes of absolute space-time: ∆U: ∑Se=S; ∑Tƒ=T.

Since to ensure ‘existence’ in present and future time beyond death, all those dual systems of waves/particles and bodies/heads of internal vital space and time cycles, will perform 5 åctions of ‘existence’ that improve their survival:

They will gauge information (∆ï) with its particles/heads and move in space (∆a) to locate and feed on fields of energy (∆e) with its waves/bodies to iterate/reproduce its form in an offspring of similar forms (∆œ), to last beyond death, and finally they will evolve socially from individuals into Universals (∆u) to become stronger, and succeed in its search for energy and information to iterate and survive. It doesn’t matter if this program of the 5 åctions of space-time is mechanical, geometric, logic, bio-logic or conscious. It HAPPENS because species that have followed this simple space-time program have survived. And it is that simple because it is a program based in the existence of only 2 ‘formal motions’ in the Universe, internal and external space-time.

Thus the program of existence is determined by the duality of external and internal space-time and the evolutionary, survival nature of ‘existence’. You either exist if you repeat yourself through this simple program into the future, or you fail in the program of absorption of energy and information in the external world to repeat your internal space-time and then you cease to exist, you become extinct. Simple, isn’t? Now we humans observe this program as everything else. And the program is to us the more evident in biological life beings.

This is all what animals do and so biologists call this program the ‘drives of life’, but humans follow the same program (though we don’t like to recognize it as such, given ego-trips of freedom). And the same program is followed by physical systems (so the same anthropomorphism make us deny since Descartes falsely divided ‘matter’ and ‘mind’, with its pious religious beliefs, as two different realms).

So before we go along, we will consider the previous example: electrons, the simplest particle of the Universe of which we are all made (and quarks too), absorb energy, gauge light as information, move in an external field, iterate its form decoupling into new particles and evolve socially into atoms.

The coding of those 5 åctions is called the 4 quantum numbers: the principal quantum number defines the wave-motion of the electron around the atom, and it also shows its internal energy level (here external and internal motion coincides from the perspective of the human observer):

∆a, ∆e; the same electron gauges information, as it jumps when it sees a light photon and feeds on it, (∆e, ∆ï), ‘growing in size’, jumping its orbit, and this action is code by the second azimuthal quantum number; the same electron when it has enough energy and finds an inverse spin electron produces a seminal ray that creates new electron, and this action is code by its spin number, (orientation in space, similar to ‘gender’ in biological systems), and finally the magnetic number organizes multiple electrons to fit a social geometry. The coding of those electrons is thus mathematical, through geometric configurations coded by those numbers. And it ensures the stability and survival of the atom.

But if we go beyond human beings and observe the social structures of mankind, nations and civilizations, we shall see how we can study them also through those 5 åctions. As societies absorb energy from their environment (agriculture, raw materials: Economic system) ∆e; they move and reproduce historically their civilization in other regions of the absolute space-time of Earth. So today European cultures have daughter cultures from their age of empires (∆a, ∆ï), they evolve their information internally, and so civilizations become ever more complex in information (∆ï), and finally they grow socially till forming a Universal civilization, globalized mankind that fills the absolute space-time of humanity, planet Earth.

This simple function of existence will be in living systems, the body and head, which determines the existential momentum of the being, such as a top predator life system will be one which deploys maximal existential momentum, more intelligence with their head, which processes information and more energy with their body. And again, in physical systems, the particle with maximal momentum will survive better in collisions. So when a star and a black hole collide, the black hole survives and reproduces new black holes, and so on. While in societies, the nation with more information and military force always win wars and reproduces in the other nation its memes.

And the fundamental law of physical systems is the conservation of lineal and cyclical motions, lineal and angular momentum.

Further on, the derivative of momentum in physics is called ‘force’ F=∂(mv); which is a quanta of action’ in which the system employs part of its momentum to move or transfer its motion to other system. Thus Force would be described by the first of those åctions, ∂a. While on the other hand the ∫mv, the integration of all the existential momentum of a being throughout the sum of all its motions give us the total energy of the system, 1/2mv^{2}. And again those are the conserved quantities, whose balances in a physical system determine its main laws, since Newton found them for systems of mass, and latter Maxwell for systems of charges, (momentum, energy, balance of forces).

**Fractal Existences in Space and Time.**

By a fractal network we mean a network of fractal points, the fundamental unit of the Universe, a fractal ‘point of existence’, is *any closed system of the Universe with a minimal content of Energy and Information, ExI, which includes all physical systems (made of complementary particles of information and waves of energy) and all biological systems (made with heads/nuclei of information and bodies of energy), and all social systems (made of an upper class in control of the informative languages of society, its digital money and verbal laws that direct a body of citizens that act as the working energy of the society)*.

We thus expand easily the philosophical concept of a Universe made of fractal Systems of Energy and Information, to the ‘particle/wave, head/body, upper/middle class’ structure of reality.

But in reality there is a 3^{rd} element, as all systems exist in a larger world from where they extract energy and motion and bits of information, and where they reproduce and evolve socially with similar ‘fractal points’. Consider any ‘closed system’ with a volume of energy and information, any fractal point, let us say a particle or an atom, or a planet or a galaxy or a gas/liquid/solid mass of matter, or a social civilization. In such a system we shall immediately localize a mass of similar, ‘cells’, which form the bulk of the body of the system, a center of information and then a 3^{rd} element, lineal limbs/force lines which connect and disconnect the system from a larger world which gives energy and information to the system. That larger world, ST±4, is the whole Universe with whom the fractal point interacts with.

In which it iterates its åctions of accelerated motions, ∂a, energy feeding, ∂e, informative perception, ∂I, offspring reproduction, ∂o and Universals Creation, ∂U, processes that all fractal points follow.

Those åctions are ‘smaller’ motions, performed by the whole system, a ‘derivative’, ∆Ñ absorption or emission of |-space and O-Time, the two geometrical motions of the Universe, with the effect of provoking a translation in space, ∂a, an increase or loss of body energy-mass, ∂e, an increase of perception, ∂I, a reproductive seminal offspring ∂o, and a social evolution into larger groups in the scalar process of generation and growth into a full complex Universal, ∆-1=10^{10} I systems

**This is what we are…** Fractal Existences, which combine energy and information, ExI on iterative cyclical åctions of space and time, STU±4. What kind of cyclical åctions, with a form in space and a frequency in time, ‘fractal beings perform’?

Those which make them survive as a form of information, a form in action, an organic system. As 5 are the essential survival åctions of all beings, we used the acronym, æ,e,ï,œ,û to design them, with a ∆, delta symbol of growth or its mathematical equivalent, ∂, to signify them: ∆∑æ, changes in motion of beings (±∂v=a), ∆∏Tƒ changes in the information of beings

This huge conceptual advance allow us to unify the two fundamental fields of science, Biology, which studies systems made of bodies of energy and heads of information and Physics, which studies fields of energy directed by particles of information, moving in a ‘background of space-time’. Why?

Because now those fields are made in fact of spatial energy and those particles are knots of clocks of temporal information. In other words, the ‘abstract’, mathematical Cartesian frame of space-time becomes a human ‘artifact’ that ‘sees’ as a continuum a puzzle of entities made of space and time. We are NOT in a background of space-time.

**SOCIAL MODELS. THE FIFTH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ UPANISHADS, on the fact each mind has a language, with the same ternary F(t) operandi G(S) syntax, NOT only mathematics.

‘Love each other as I have loved you’

Jesus* On the arrow of eusocial love , the program of ‘God’ that builds up the 5th dimension.*

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’ *Einstein, on what truly should matter to science – the whys.*

‘The why is the only thing a physicist does not question’ * Feynman (On the reductionism of physicists)*

‘ I know the non-AE thoughts of God; the mind of the Universe, since I am made to its image and likeness’ *ls*

‘Reality is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe’ Plato

**PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS. A new paradigm changes our view of the Universe.**

As you can see, the 5th dimension paradigm has changed completely our philosophy of the Universe and upgraded completely our perception of it. There is no longer a single time, the human clock, and a continuous space, but an infinite number of pieces of time and space. Today some physicists wonder on those paths, such as the remarkable work of Smolin and others with their theory of quantum gravity, in which space is made of infinite quanta and time is made of infinite clocks.

But those theories as always in physics, are restricted to mathematical mappings of a geometry of multiple spaces and times. The work we are describing here goes much further as it intends to apply its discoveries also to biological and social sciences and the causal logic of time, to theory of information and philosophy of perception, creating a veritable unification of most sciences and upgrading our logic and mathematical languages….

*It is a paradigm that was started by Leibniz who realized that time clocks are infinite; hinted at by Einstein who said ‘I seem to be the only scientist who thinks time speeds are different in different regions of the Universe, and finally formalized by this author in the milieu of systems sciences to make it useful for hard science with new mathematical and logic tools. *

As all new paradigms of science however the present stage of studies of the 5th dimension is limited to a few researchers and disputed by the practitioners of the previous paradigm – the study of the 4th dimension of a single space-time continuum. In any case, given the skepticism and limits of ‘reason’ of most humans, who believe in previous scientific paradigms and will not even consider a serious analysis of the 5th dimension, we will start explaining why scientific paradigms keep evolving… and finding resistance from old ones, analyzing the expansion of our point of view of the Universe from subjectivity and religions myths into objective science – a process, which despite the ‘belief’ of many scientists has not ended and won’t probably end with the new paradigm of the 5th dimension, just a step in a quest to find ‘the total information of the Universe, which is only known to itself’ (J.Haldane).

It should not; since according to the laws of the scientific method a new paradigm merely expands the discoveries of the previous one, validating them from a wider perspective.

How can we do that? Thanks precisely to the mathematical and logic rigor of this theory that Leibniz lacked despite its insights in the concepts of ‘relational time’ and ‘fractal space’. And to do so we have to establish with modern rigor what mathematicians and physicists call the ‘geometry’ or metric of space-time – a description with mathematical equations of the elements of a space-time that remain invariant, without change, allowing the stability we perceive in the Universe.

But to do so we cannot longer rely on a shallow, simple mathematical description of it. We need specially to upgrade the logic, perceptive way we do science. It has been too easy for previous paradigms to go onto mathematical equations without knowing what we meant by words such as time (‘what a clock measures’ even if it was said by Mr. Einstein is not really a good definition), space, dimension, wave, particle, information, energy, etc.

Huge errors in physics happen, such as those of Mr. Hawking with his obtuse theories about time travel to the past, information lost in black holes, which become time machines evaporating back in time, ‘—motions’-only theories of a dying Universe, big-bangs that kill it, 10-dimensional strings, etc. etc. because physicists just take a few equations and start to play with numbers and then put words to those numbers without any logic or conceptual rigor; even forgetting how it all started.

Take the concept of time, ‘what a clock measures’. A more sophisticated definition was that of Galileo, V=s/t. All other definitions of time, including Einstein comes from that equation. But what that equation means? Merely the study of how entities change their position in space.

An entity is in A and then it is in B and time has changed that position. So what really time means is ‘change’. And ALL forms of change define a time event. So there are change in the motion and position in space of entities and this is PHYSICAL CHANGE-TIME. It is what Galileo studied. But then there are changes in the morphology, in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings and this is also therefore time, evolutionary time what Biology studies.

Time is change and this definition must precede any disquisitions of the kind physicists do, unaware that if time is change, there are infinite changes in the Universe, hence infinite time clocks. Hence things like Mr. Hawking ‘black holes as time machines’ derived from the use of a SINGLE time-clock, the human clock to measure time ARE just nonsense. Since each clock is independent of all other time clocks of the Universe. But if black holes cannot travel to a single time past then they cannot evaporate.

Further on most physicists unaware that information is also an arrow of time, in fact the most important, tend to spatialize time and consider only a 4th dimension or ‘arrow of time’ towards the future called ‘—motions’. So the Universe dies into the future. Again this is a simplistic reduction. Information is also an arrow of time towards the future. And again if we apply this to Mr. Hawking’s work we solve his paradox of information: because systems do increase information towards the future (so we live longer and learn more, our societies become more complex, stars go towards the center of the galaxy with more form, etc. etc.).

Problem is that for that reason black holes do NOT evaporate, but create mass evaporating our electromagnetic worlds (so if one is made at CERN and other experiments, based in 4D physics and ‘—motions’ wrong theories, we will all die, but that is another story->www.cerntruth.com)

All this said 4 FUNDAMENTAL conclusions of 5D metric that CHANGE completely our perception of reality are:

– The Universe is eternal, made of 2 motions in perpetual e<=>o change, NOT of substances.

– Since the metric of 5D for the whole space-time Universe are the same than the equation which defines the 2 parts of any system, we conclude that we do NOT exist over an independent space-time but we *are made of space and time, each of us is a complex system made of bits of temporal information, of circadian or physical clocks and surfaces of vital space, imprinted by the form of those cyclical in-form-ations.*

In physical systems all scales and particles are background dependent, *constructed with pieces of spatial energy and temporal information, starting with the smallest theoretical scale of *background dependent, lineal, open strings which *are* rods of Planck’s space and cyclical, closed strings which are the tiniest Planck’s time-clocks.

– Since all systems are made of Se and Tƒ, 5D Isomorphisms and laws *apply to all systems of the Universe, *creating a PANTHEIST Universe, a fractal of its Fundamental Particle, the Complementary Systems, SexTƒ=k.

– All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions: *MOTIONS WITH FORM*

**The change of paradigm, from abstract, non-exact measures, to fluid, topological life.**

Humans of course like simplicity and quantitative precision. It makes them feel safe, but the result is often shallow. Because the Universe is more complex than the human mind, which simplifies it to ‘fit’ all the information of reality in its small brain. So the mind is somehow ‘black and white’.

Fractals, which are at the core of the structure of ‘vital=moving spaces’ enacting ‘time cycles’, are more chromatic, with infinite varieties and combinations. A fractal is a logic-mathematical structure made of very few components, which can be expressed in a generator equation. Hence the simplicity of that generator equation of the Fractal Universe of Multiple Spaces and Times: Se x Tƒ = ST.

But that initial simplicity is deceptive, because the enormous richness of forms a fractal display come from the ambivalence of the 3 ‘elements’ of that equation: Spatial ‘—motions’, Time cycles and its ‘infinite’ combinations.

Thus we shall use the metric equation of the 5th dimension, which the ‘reader’ that has gone so far, will recognize as yet another kaleidoscopic expression of the Fractal Generator, to organize all those time cycles and spatial sizes and explain many phenomena from the ‘chip law’ (smaller chips think faster) to the laws of evolution and survival, to the genetic paradox (smaller cells code the information of slower, larger systems), to the role of black holes (which are smaller but much faster vortices of gravitational mass, with more attractive power), to the unification of charges and masses (which is an equation where a charge just turns much faster, than a mass, on in terms of ‘fixed spatial form’ has much more curvature or in terms of attractive power, is much more attractive as a faster hurricane or black hole is).

In each of those Planes of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in ‘—motions’, ‘or |-Motion’ which space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

And that duality is ‘defined’ by a metric equation: Se x Tƒ= R(i). That is, the product of the size or ‘—motions’ of a system and the speed of its informative time cycles, remains invariant across scales. So atoms are smaller then galaxies but turn much faster.

Thus we write:

*Max. Se ( maximal Spatial ‘—motions’ content) = Min. Tƒ ( Minimal Temporal, cyclical Speed).*

Since both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolisms. Yet the product of both parameters remains the same.

A fact that can be written as a ‘co-invariant’ equation, called the “metric of the 5th dimension”, which in its simplest expression defines the main planes of space-time of the Universe:

* Se x Tƒ=∆±4*

Whereas in static terms, Se means ‘spatial size’ and Tƒ, ‘cyclical form’ and in moving terms, Se means entropic, expansive, |-Motion and Tƒ means cyclical, implosive, informative motion.

And that duality must be fully grasp because it is at the bottom line of the fundamental meanings of reality.

Now we have to deal with the concept of space and the Galilean paradox, since space has motion but lineal, expansive motion, what is called usually ‘‘—motions’’ and sometimes ‘energy’. And we need to understand this fact to clarify those concepts.

In that regard, there is not so much difference between Galileo and Einstein. Both study changes in the motion and position of beings, calculating distances by mixing those two rods, light-space and human clocks in his equations to calculate with far more precision the motions of the Universe.

But the human clock is only one of the infinite rhythms of time of the Universe. Indeed, a second is just the time cycle of a human clock, but there are other cycles. A day is the cycle of the earth’s clock rotating around its axis. A year, is the Earth’s clock of the cycle that turns around the sun. Each ‘cycle’ that closes into itself is a clock of time. A mass that rotates is a clock of time. So it is a charge that rotates. There are infinite clocks of time.

Further on space is clearly discontinuous in the quantum scale. And there are many ‘scales’ of space not only light space. You have your own vital space without light inside. The space of the Universe is filled with broken pieces of ‘other substance’ than light. And so those 2 limits of Einstein’s work, the use of a single human clock and the consideration of space as only light space must be changed.

Einstein did some work on that sense with his expanded General relativity in which he tried to include the ‘invisible’ gravitational space that we know it exists because we feel gravitation but we do not see, because unlike light we do not see gravitation. But he still kept a single time and he could not to explain the vital spaces and time clocks of life of which evolution was taking care.

Indeed, the amazing fault of 4D physics, is its incapacity to explain all other phenomena in which time is a fundamental variable, including history and biology. So their pretension of being the ‘theory of time’ is misguided. But in as much as most people, including probably Einstein and Minkowski did not fully understand the limits of their inquire, it became trendy to boast the importance of their arguments. Those limits will become evident as we explain the new paradigm of multiple time clocks and points of measure.

Now it is important to understand why those paradigms have lasted so long and have been accepted with so much zeal. On one side there is the obvious mentality of men who believe mostly instead of reasoning, that is learn and memorize without much thinking theories as absolute truths.

But more important is the simple fact that each of those theories adapted perfectly to the quantity of data we had about the Universe from the point of view in which the theory was created.

The Germans and its ego-centered came from an age in which families lived in small groups and that was all what seemed to be the Universe. Then your nation and tribe was all what you could see; so a tribe could be God (Abrahamic religions). Then we saw the sun and the moon and the Earth seemed a center. Finally we expanded to planets and stars and we moved to the sun and light-space. Now we know about dark energy, quasars, dark matter, gravitation, circadian cycles, life cycles and we need to expand the point of view again to multiple time cycles.

** **

How can we interpret the interplay of points of timespace with motion and form we see around us, when we want to go beyond the actions of those points and its selfish point of view:

Answer, we transcend into U∆+1

The Union of infinite infinitesimal points of energy and information that give birth to a constant space-time plane.

The Universe is a game of 3 perpetual motions, which however synchronise its cycles of existence in time, *to create ternary, Γœ supeorganisms*, in such a form that a simultaneous, “perpendicular image” of them in ‘space’ shows a hidden, formal intelligence, as parts form networks ‘alliances’ of world cycles, which emerge as whole ∆+1, to become ternary complex subtle systems called super organisms, constantly varying in each ‘specific stientific species’ but with an underlying network structure, clearly recognisable.

SO a synchronous SERIES of flash images of a supeorganism in each ‘action’ will show it to be a world cycle of space-time, webbed by clone networks.

*In a Universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time and infinite speeds of time cycles, there is however a single way to order them: Γœ. Superorganisms tracing world cycles embedded in its function of existence, Γ.*

So as usual we play with similar terms. T.Œ, A theory of everything describes all the Γœ, super organisms of the Universe and its world cycles.

To order all those world cycles requires to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe.

But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time. Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower.

*This is a Universal law:*

Mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant.

So we can write in a first approximation: Sp x Tƒ = ∆ and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tƒ, whereas Tƒ is the fundamental symbols for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA.

*Let us then in the second part of this introductory post on the 3 elements of reality consider all together now, how fractal space-time beings trace its world cycles of existence, by varying the speed of its time cycles, the size of its spatial form, and organising themselves into networks that become complex organisms of energy and information .*

The simplest equation of space time is present energy = past entropy *operandi* future information.

How entropy is recollected by an operandi of future information tends to take then two different paths:

exi= s ±t.

**The unification of scales, through time clocks and space-quanta.**

The immense number of solutions the metric 5D equation brings to mathematical physics, is fascinating, including the Unification of G and k.

Since those 2 constants are merely the constants of ‘relative curvature and time speed’ of the largest and smallest gravitational and quantum scales of reality. So masses and charges, are vortices, which as space and time can be transformed into each other, can be considered as space-quanta hence curvatures (Einstein’s treatment of mass, Faraday treatment of charges as lines of force in space or field concept) and if we consider them cyclical motions of time, or clocks of both scales, as attractive vortices (Newton’s concept of mass and quantum concept of charge).

And so when we realise we are studying two fractal scales of the Universe, mathematically as I showed in that other article we can unify their values, and we shall find that the curvature of k, and its speed as an attractive vortex of space-time, is paradoxically 10 up to 40 times faster-stronger-more curved in the smaller k f charges than the larger, slower G of masses.

But the revolution of thought goes much further. For example, each scale we shall find to have a different faster or smaller clock of time (below some examples) and a larger or smaller Universal constant of space quanta. So the 3 scales of human perception, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale have 3 different clocks, ∆-1 ‘frequency’, ∆-temperature, and ∆+1 speed, and 3 different quanta of bidimensional space, H-planck (angular momentum), k (entropy) and M (mass).

And yet the beauty of it is that the metric of the 5th dimension always work.

** The bias of artificial time clocks and physics has limited our understanding of reality.**

The conclusion of the fractal paradigm is obvious:

Physical, human measures of reality with a single time and space are more complex specially at conceptual level than the more realist model, using the proper quanta of space measure (the so called Universal constants) and time clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed) but they do work. Moreover they have established a scientific praxis for 400 years that would be extremely costly to vary, as the Industrial revolution, converted the clock today evolved into a computer in the model of all temporal things, and the meter, today the speed of light, as the quanta of all spaces.

And so physicists are comfortable with this absolute space-time picture of reality. We, Philosophers of science, however are not practical beings, only concerned with the objective truths of the Universe. So we are not satisfied with Physicists’ models and the purpose of this blog is to establish a more objective picture of the Universe, using the different clocks of time and quanta of space we find in Nature (as science is ultimately the search for an objectivity that goes beyond the subjective human anthropomorphic view, so science moved from earth-centric models to heliocentric models, and should move from human time models into Universal time models).

So the quantic nature of space and cyclical nature of time was forgotten, and the fact that we are ‘relational space-time beings’, made of space quanta and time cycles, – Leibniz’s alternative model to that of Newton, remained ignored for 2 centuries.

Then in the XIX and XX century, new advances in mathematics, physics and biology made unavoidable the resurrection of the ‘real models’ of Nature, as Darwin found the evolutionary, time rhythms of nature and its species, which were neither infinite in duration, nor it follow the steady mechanical, artificial rhythm of human time clocks; Lobachevski found that space was indeed discontinuous, with different geometrical forms in different regions of the Universe, Einstein found time clocks were multiple and run at different speeds, and defined the quanta of the larger gravitational scale of size, or rest mass, while quantum theorists discovered in the other extreme of size, the H-Planck bidimensional quanta of angular momentum h, was also a constant; and Boltzmann found the Universal quanta of space of thermodynamic world, ‘Entropy’, was also a constant K.

When physicists discovered that in fact even the smallest spaces do have motion and are made of quanta, and Einstein discovered that the rhythms of time varied and had different speeds, the routines of this ‘simplistic’ Newtonian model had to be changed. As Einstein put it: ‘Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the entire scaffolding of western science from its foundations’.

Thus human concepts of a continuous absolute space and lineal absolute time, invented by Newton and the mechanical clocks, are no longer valid, and we must substitute them for the real concepts of nature and modern physics: a world of multiple space quanta with motion and a world of multiple cycles of time with different speeds.

Why a philosopher of science and not a physicist has completed such a model should be obvious to the reader. The philosopher of science is concerned with the big questions, what is time, space, energy information and with the unification of all sciences and scales of reality form quantum to astronomy through biology and social sciences. So themes of such wide range as those treated here are more proper of philosophers of science.

Further on, the philosopher of science departs not from the study of a specific type of space-time systems (physical systems of matter) but from the principle, laws and mathematical and logic languages of time and space, we humans use to perceive reality. Thus once the physicist gather experimental evidence with its instruments, he is at loss with the theoretical analysis on the widest possible terms of those experiments There is where the work fo the philosopher of science, master of languages of thought more than of machines of perception, comes in.

Since science is a logic, mathematical statement about reality, so there are also clear new advances on logic and mathematics, which in the XIX century r=evolved scientific thought and again have not yet fully incorporated into our models of reality.

Since science is based in mathematical languages, and language is based in geometry, scientists faced in the XIX century the shocking fact that Euclidean geometry is not truth; since the 5^{th} postulate of Geometry, which defines points with no breath, through which only a line also with no breath, can cross, proved false. There are different possible geometries, in which points do have breath, so several parallels can cross their volume, or points exist in a different surface through which no parallels exist.

How can we then introduce the new concepts of points with breath, surfaces with different numbers of parallels, in the scientific discourse of different sciences? Here again little advance was done, and so mathematicians at the beginning of the XX century decided to get away with the problem by merely NOT defining any longer the concepts of points, planes, lines and the relationships between them (their relative similarity or ‘congruence’ and the way they ‘intersect and lay on’). Thus two new false solutions were devised. On one side, instead of points and numbers, the classic units of mathematics that made them a realist science.

So physicists and philosophers of science have been aware for a century that space is quantic, with motion, and there are infinite time cycles-clocks in Nature. Yet the difficulty to re-define the fundamental original proposition of science, paralleled by the constant needs for merely parched the model.

Look around you. All what you perceive are 2 type of ‘forms in motion’, lineal forms that we shall call space, S, when perceived in stillness or lineal momentum, |-p, when perceived in motion, and cyclical forms, which we shall call time cycles or angular momentum when in motion, measured by frequency, |-Tƒ and information form when seeing in stillness.

And so those 2 elements, |-Spe and O-Tiƒ, spatial momentum and temporal form, and its infinite combinations, measured with different time clocks, frequency, temperature, speed and space quanta, H-Planck, K-entropy and M-ass, and integrated into different types of ‘energy and information’, is truly what all the Universe is made of. And so we can write a simple Generator equation of the Universe:

Ei= Sp x Tƒ for all scales of reality, which breaks down for the 3 main physical scales into the 3 most important equations of mathematical physics: E=hv (for the ∆-1 quantum scale), E=knT (for the ∆-human thermodynamic scale) and E=1/2mv² or E=mc² in Einstein’s relativity for the gravitational ∆+1 scale.

This never before explained meaning of the main universal constants and clocks of time of nature is the beginning of a revolution of thought that either humans or robots, if they survive the age of global weapons and war we live in, and preserve this planet for future human or mechanical generations, will research in depth, as it is the next step on the search of science for a non-anthropomorphic, scientific, objective description of the fractal, organic Universe. And the only model able to achieve…

We have used a loosely connected concept of space as lineal form with less motion that time a cyclical accelerated vortex to describe the fundamental game=law of the Universe, which is the constant beat back and forth between both formal motions. We can rephrase the game in many ways depending on how much information and varieties of that beat we include in the ‘sentence’

‘The Universe is a game of knots of space-time cyclical motions that switch back and forth between the states of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information, ad eternal’

It is today customary in the peculiar present frame of mind of the human species, with its cult(ure) of sensorial machines to reframe this game in terms of physical measures with metal-minds and its mathematical language as the principle of energy conservation. Otherwise the human ‘believer’ will not feel satisfied.

We obviously will do so in the posts on physics but not here. As ‘the languages of god are infinite’ (upanishads) and the way they express the underlying game of existence, also.

It is though important to consider that, being physics the study of motions, the game does have a strong physical content, namely its ‘motion properties or time’; as it has a strong mathematical content, ‘its formal properties or space’.

If we consider the game to be expressed in ternary terms as |-Sp<STœ>O-Tƒ elements, this how external motion and form will be the point of view of the ST present element.

But then when we seek beyond those 2 primary hows, we shall find the game actually has from the Tƒ point of view, a mental, psychological nature – namely to provide ‘perception to its 0-points of will that seek for positions of maximal perception at the centre of its territory.

And it has from the Sp-field/limb point of view a by extension of human sensations, some pleasure or sense of chaotic freedom when in motion.

Those internal points of view however are under the larger world view of the game, through its scales of the 5th dimension. There, the game has a teleological sense because beyond the Œn-plane of existence, the game does build co-existing super organisms, across multiple planes of existence, through elements, which are the most sophisticated of the game: synchronicities and co-existences, time travels and eusocial loving evolution. This is the level of understanding of the game in terms of its more complex fundamental element: as a SUPERORGANISM.

This said as always in the ternary expression of the Universe we can with the symbols of ¬Æ to express the game in 3 manners.

The fundamental beat of the Universe is the stop and go, form and motion, space and time beat of energy and information, informative perception and entropic pleasure, Sp>Tƒ>Sp>Tƒ>Tiƒ>Spe>Tƒ…

The importance of this beat of existence as one of the fundamental modes of being…

along the change of form, Tƒ<|s>Tƒ<|s>Mt<Spe>Mt<Spe…

And the beats of parts and wholes along the 5th dimension, ∂t=S : ∫S=t… compound the 3 dualities of what we call in a larger sense, ‘space and time’, the beats of existence.

In this post we shall study them in a generic way, complementary to their analysis with more formal rigour in the 3rd line (2-manifolds), in which we will analyse how a dimension of time and one of space come together into being.

Now, that such a beat exists in all scales and it is the fundamental mode of being, in all arts, in all expressions of the space-time cycle should be obvious from the point of view of the human observer, from which we always depart in our analysis of reality.

You stop and perceive and observe form, you walk then to the point you observe; and so two space-time actions are chained, also by this first beat of existence

∆i (gauging information)<∆a: moving towards a goal most likely < ∆e, feeding on energy…

Without perceiving form however the beat of existence cannot start its walk.

And the next step of the understanding of this beat of existence, is the parallelism between Space and Energy and Time and information, the still and go versions of this rhythm.

There are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries that move (called for that reason ‘topologies’).

Thus all systems can only have 3 kind of parts: Toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon); hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. In the graph, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show those 3 similar topologic structures. This similarity is called an ‘isomorphism’, iso=equal, morph=form.

**II. NON-Æ MATHEMATICS: DISCONTINUOUS PLANES ORGANIC NETWORKS**

** The formalism of Dual systems of energy and information**

All those facts must be formalized with new tools of mathematics and Logic. The mathematics of a fractal, organic, self-generating Universe are Non-Euclidean geometries whose 5 postulates we complete going beyond the work of Riemann, who defined a point with ‘volume’ through which many parallels can cross. Hence a point must be a fractal that grows in size as we come closer to it, allowing more parallels to go through. Such fractal point with breadth, with form and motion, with energy, becomes the new unit (new 1^{st} postulate), of Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics, (of which all other geometries are simplifications), in which lines are waves (as points have motion and form) and planes are social networks.

A fractal point is the ‘organic unit’ of a certain i-scale of the Universe that from a higher plane of existence appears as an Euclidean point without breadth, but as we can closer it becomes bigger and shows its form and motion. So we humans see in the limit of our perception, quarks and electrons as fractal points without parts and in the galactic realm we see with naked eyes, stars and galaxies as fractal points without parts; but as we come closer those fractal points should acquire volume. And all of them will follow the Mathematical Laws of Fractal, non-Euclidean geometry.

In logic we also have to upgrade Aristotelian Logic to understand a Universe with two arrows of time, one of energy and other of information, of relative past and future, which combine to create the dominant arrow of ‘present=existence’. We call this logic, which adds the arrow of information, i-logic.

It explains the meaning of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time, and how they interact to form reality. Two are the essential equations of the 3 dimensions of time: past->present ->future, which gives us a diachronic analysis of reality, through the 3 ages of time. And Past (energy system) x Future (informative system) = Present organism, which defines the systems we perceive in space.

Thus in this 2^{nd} lesson on a General Systems theory of systems of spatial energy and information, we shall consider the most important laws of reality – the laws that generate temporal information (laws of logic) and the laws that generate spatial energy (mathematical laws), upgrading the previous paradigm of a continuous single space-time and a single, causal logic defined by the arrow of entropy, to introduce the existence of multiple, fractal space-times and two arrows of logic, energy that evolves from past to future into information and vice versa.

What you see is just a slice of spatial energy that the logic of time evolves into the future. And so philosophers of science have always wondered if there was a plan of creation that all systems followed.

Physics was the first science to find that plan, albeit in its simplest laws that apply only to the most obvious motions of the future – translation in space. Biology thanks to the work of Darwin found the next type of laws, those that define time=change in the morphology of beings. The application of those laws to history and economics by Marx, Kondratieff and Spengler however was halted by the fact that humans don’t want to know their own program.

What the 4th paradigm brings to all those insights to the logic of creation is a super-structure that includes them all and signals an arrow of time dominant in all systems: the arrow of social evolution of ‘points or numbers’, which are herds and groups of self-similar beings into networks and complex systems.

This arrow of social evolution, which applies in all scales of reality from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes could also be interpreted in mystique terms as the ‘mind of the Universe’, or ‘the game of existence’, God, the ‘seer and creator of times’ in the classic mysticism of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Buddhism. Since indeed the logic of creation is a game of two arrows of time, energy and information, with many properties similar to those described by Taoism, Buddhism and Eastern philosophies.

What those philosophies lacked was the proper mathematical formalism, which required the definition of a fractal point, the completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the development of the laws that create networks and systems, and organize them into scales of reality that follow self-similar goals. This formalism and the discovery of the feed-back, fractal, generator equation of spaces-times, the Saint Grail of the 4^{th} paradigm is what I found and exposed in a series of Congresses of System sciences in the last decade and now I bring to you in this pdf on the ‘Mind of God’, and the 3 next lesson on its application to its ‘details’, the astrophysical, biological and sociological species of the Universe.

However, the Mind of God, the Logic of creation is far more complex than the one monist, mechanist physicists have resolved. So you will have to sharpen your mind to put it to Its level. But if you do so with patience you will upgrade your perception of reality to a level in which the fog of the senses will no longer hide the forest.

Thus, the 4^{th} paradigm requires a new formalism to describe the mathematical, geometrical and logical, causal processes that create the networks of reality. All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3^{rd }paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. The 4^{th} paradigm analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points, which become networks of self-similar beings. 4 is not only number four, but a series of topologies created with 4 points; and so it follows that the more points we have the more complex a network becomes. Can we reduce all those topologies of network spaces to a few laws and structures as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirm that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half, no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate is changed, we had to adapt the other 4 basic elements of geometry to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz). And yet the restrictions of topology that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe, the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic, reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3 functions or arrows of time, energy, information and reproduction.

Those 3 functions become the 3 functions of specialized networks of points, which construct all the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic energy, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

This simple first elements of reality, points with volume, that exchange energy and information, creating waves no longer lines (2^{nd} postulate), according to a set of laws based in their self-similarity, no longer equality (3^{rd}postulate), and evolve further into topological networks (no longer planes, 4th postulate), makes mathematics again the language of the Universe, but a language with more volume, an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe – one in which there are infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum.

So we establish a basic equation that defines all systems as complementary systems of energy and information that fluctuate in space as organisms and time as cyclical beings with 3 ages:

Sp>ST>Tƒ. And we can talk of a simple series of basic equations and developments that describe synoptically what those systems do.

**A NEW R=EVOLUTION OF SCIENCE.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ *Steane*

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of space-time organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch*. *

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal, disordered space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its *combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.*

For that reason, we have added for good measure to the quote of Steane, the philosophical thought of Einstein, author of the previous paradigm of 4D space-time, which corresponds to the limit of this model in a single space-time continuum described with a single arrow of time, ENTROPY.

The truly interesting element of Mr. Steane’s definition is however in the final sentence, which is one of those magic clear-cut expressions of reality, coming out of nowhere, like the sentences of Schopenhauer with his intuitions for century to come. Mr. Steane simply understands there is a second arrow of time, information and somehow a third element, which he does not fully recognise but it is there, the third arrow of time, momentum – the present, iterative=repetitive conserved quality, mixture of the other two, which is what the Universe is all about: the reproduction and hence dynamic conservation of momentums composed of informative particles (masses and charges) and entropic motions (speeds), which we integrate into ‘conservative, closed energy world cycles’ – the whole trajectory, life or rather ‘existence’ of any event or process of nature.

In the graph we illustrate the 3 motions≈topologies of time-space.

It must be said a priori that we are here taken concepts of physics to a new level of philosophical understanding to describe the 3 arrows of time – so by entropy we mean the ‘disordered, expansive motion of space’ proper of big-bangs and deaths of matter. Since physicists have a very poor understanding of their concepts but an excellent mathematical praxis describing reality, they make a mess when we realise how different are their ‘dual concepts’.

So entropy is in philosophy of physics disorder, expansive gaseous states, and from here we take the concept, *enlarged to all scales, as philosophy of physics has done, but only to disorder, expansive motion, which are 1/3rd of the motions that take place in a ‘world cycle’ of time (you can consider it as ‘one of the diameters’ of the π-cycle)… *

*W*hile in statistical thermodynamics and mathematical physics (theory of information), entropy is a measure of the ‘ternary paths of future’ available to each ‘partition’ of an ensemble of molecules with a very defined mathematical equation, S=k lnΩ, which we will do properly explain in our introductory article on thermodynamics, and use the concept to study the causality and probabilities species have to take any of those 3 paths

. As systems, we shall find, can evolve only in three directions of space-time, in as much as there are only three type of ‘moving geometries’=topologies; limiting and guiding the ‘formal evolution’ of a system, which will either repeat itself in an iterative path; or warp, increasing its forms, its in-form-ation, in a vortex-like accelerated future, of higher frequency and lesser space, or inversely will expand in a decelerated explosion that erases its information. And we call this ‘big-bang’ death or dissolution of the system, the arrow of entropy and death.

So we clarify *with the guidance of the topological varieties of the Universe* and the foggy concepts of physicists, when interpreting its awesome beauty-equations.

Back to the duality of entropy-only theorists (physicists) and information only theorists (cybernetics), the fault is on the one-dimensional limited mind of man who has an aristotelian logic, of 0 vs. 1, true or false (ab. A-logic), which is NOT the i-logic structure of the Universe (ab. Non-Æ, non aristotelian time logic and non-euclidean fractal space).

So even before we go further to clarify also we are upgrading logic and maths from human single minds into the next ‘letter’, i, the logic of information, the logic beyond Æ, which is a logic of co-existence, between three elements of reality, entropy, information and its momentum-energy combinations in time, of co-exitence of three symmetric topologies of space, the limbs/fields of motion, the wave-bodies of energy and the particle-heads of information, and a logic of co-existence of three fractal scales of ‘being’ the ∆-1 atomic/cellular scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, ecosystemic/gravitational scale of physical and biological systems – we omit often for simplicity the third group of social disciplines with its 3 social classes, scales and topologies of nations and civilisations).

All what exists; all entities of the Fractal Universe including human beings are systems made of two COMPLEMENTARY geometries: languages and heads of information that perceive and guide blind bodies of moving energy.

And we can recognize those complementary puzzles of nature, called in the jargon of Systems Theory, Fractal Points, by their opposite, geometrical shape and properties. Since the cycle is the form that stores more information in lesser space and the line is the fastest distance between two points.

For example, all physical species are made of lineal fields of moving energy, shaped by cyclical particles of information.

All living organisms are made of planar bodies of moving energy guided by spherical heads of information.

All Human societies are made of human citizens, ruled by politicians and priests, who command nations and civilizations with legal and ethic words.

**The fifth dimension from a discrete perspectives: networks of points. The language of topo-bio-logical space-time beings; the supœrganism.**

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, Se and Ti. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

Let us of those postulates studied in detail in the sub-sections of ‘Space’, the organic meaning of the 4th postulate that defines a topological organic network.

Once the concepts of spatial energy and temporal information are properly defined, and the 5 postulates of Non-E Geometry understood we formalize a superorganism, as a particular case of the Generator equation of quantic energy and temporal information, Sp<=>Tƒ, which defines in this case the 4 fundamental elements of any super-organism:

Cellular units (S)

Networks of energy or organic, energetic space (∆+1 that create energy-body systems).

- Networks of information (Tƒ that creates information-brain systems)
- Networks that reproduce energy and information (<=>, that create organic, reproductive systems).

Reproduction can be external to the being, catalyzed by an enzymatic agent, as when men reproduce machines or DNA reproduce amino acids, or internal (then we talk of a living superorganism) Thus:

∑ E*nergy cycles/networks: Organic body<Flows of energy-information>∏ informative cycles.*

Where an E<=>T cycle is a feedback loop that engages energy and information quanta. So we affirm that:

*‘All natural entities are superorganisms that transform back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping space-time cycles: *∑*Spe<=>Tƒ’.*

Which allows us to unify the properties and structure of all *Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single *template *definition, according to which systems and super-organisms will *differ only in the degree of complexity of its networks and the specific energy or information we put into the template’s brackets and the size or complexity of its networks:

‘*A super-organism, (name a specific super-organism) is a population of (name a particular species), related by information networks (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy). A system is a partial super-organism, composed of a population of (name a particular species), related either by energy or information networks. A living super-organism is a super-organism in which the energy and information networks combine to achieve self-reproduction through a third, reproductive network.’*

Thus we classify all systems of the Universe in 3 scales of growing complexity, systems proper, super-organisms and living super-organisms.

Let us then use the previous template to define the main organic systems of the Universe, from the smallest form known to man, the atom, to the biggest one, the Universal Superorganism:

– *An atomic superorganism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy. *The atom is the simplest super-organism that starts the evolution of complexity in the Universe.

*– A molecular superorganism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Van der Waals forces). *

The biggest of those super-organisms are crystals, the most complex DNAs.

*– A cellular superorganism is a population of molecules, related by networks of water-based energy (cytoplasm, ribosome, cilium) and networks of genetic information (DNA-RNAs.) *Thus a Eukaryotic cell is a super-organism made of smaller cells (organelles) and carbohydrate molecules.

*– A human superorganism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems). *Recently we have discovered that human beings are hybrid super-organisms, as 90% of our cells and most of our genetic material belongs in fact to bacteria.

*– An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey). *And the entire sum of all those ecosystems is Gaia, the living super-organism of the Earth

– *A historic superorganism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.*

So History can be considered as the super-organism of mankind that extends in space over the Earth and in time, from the first man to the last man that will live in this planet.

*– An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc.).*

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic super-organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and includes 2 different species: human beings and machines.

*– A galaxy is a population of electromagnetic stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and light energy.*

-A Universe is a population of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and dark matter.

**I. 5D SYMMETRY BETWEEN PLANES OF EXISTENCE**

The Universe is a fractal of space-time actions. This simple truth originates all its complexity.

Planck discovered the Universe is made of quanta of a substance he called ‘action’ made of energy akin to lineal motion, locomotion and time, akin to cyclical motion, repetition of a cyclical form of in-form-ation. In his equations, Action = Energy x Time, in relativity where time was a simultaneous present moment, we see it as a bit of information, Action = Energy x Information.

So we are made of motion and form, energy and time cycles, and we reproduce through time cycles forms in motion, informations. We are all just waves of reproductive information, and when we are reproduced in herds, they assembly into a larger puzzle or fractal of self-similar forms, we call a fractal super organism, and this is the game of reality, of existences of worldcycles of energy and information, of space and time, E x I st , assembled into networks, and supeorganisms, a vital biological fractal game of re= productive creation of networks that become non-Æ planes that become superorganisms:

** EXISTENTIAL ÅCTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

**Short time åctions. The mandate of existence: keep your motions going, grow and multiply against all others.**

How can this be converted into individual actions of O-beings? Simply, by the fact that all systems seem to follow this law by trying to maximise their existence, in time and space, and the 5th dimension. That is all systems try to increase their absorption and emission of energy and information, (motion and form, | and O games): ±∆E,I, and try to form part of eusocial wholes, of clone herds and organisms that maximise its survival both as individuals and species: ±∆U.

Those are the 5 space-time actions, ∂a,e,i,o,u, we observe in all beings. And we can resume them in a simple formula.

**Γ. **Generator Equation of Time-space actions: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ,

Thus time motions at individual self-level can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ.

As each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information.

**The point with parts as a knot of space-time cycles≈arrows. The fractal point of i-logic geometry.**

Now each point of view, creator of a system of reference from where knowledge can be acquired, the original model of Descartes which only claimed to create a ‘world, that of his mind that thinks therefore exists.

The Point of view also ‘ex=ists’ and that is the function that makes him think. It will think and first perceive an external Universe In this case we can consider the first action that of perception:

∂o, when the point of view perceives, then it will act in its relative ±1 available upper and downward U-sub planes of the 5^{th} dimension with both of which TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF EXISTENCE, will perceive energy and information from diametrical non-commutative directions of the metric of its particular** fifth scale: **

In the graph the 2 directions of a flow of space-time along the 5^{th} dimension, is made through small actions ∂U±4, which related the Active Magnitude, U, to a lower plane from where *Tƒ*

will obtain: ∂I, ∂e bits & quanta. AND

**∑Tƒ:** information bits start a new point of perception, which if requiring relative motion will make the Tƒ expand its lower U-1 scales:

*∂e quanta* Motion

∑**U**:quanta expanded=disintegrated by Tƒ, which modulates that expansion to move relatively to its lower scale.

We use for the concept of a space-time cyclical action, in the attempt to gather similar concepts into strings of synonymous the following names:

space-time cycles ≈ time cycles ≈ Space-time actions ≈ time arrows ≈ existential cycles/actions ≈ knots of time cycles ≈ knots of time ≈ i-logic points ≈ functions of existences

The idea as usual is to merge jargons on the range that goes from the visual description of simpler points man perceives without form or eliminating their form – physical treatment of systems in external space-time, to the range of human self-perception, in which only the inner space-time actions and existential purpose matter to us.

So when we describe the feeding motion in the gravitational field of a star we care nothing for the internal space-time actions (feeding on energy) but for the motion, and on the other extreme of the range, when we talk of the feeding of a human being, we care nothing for the fork motions that carry the food to our mouth but for the internal sensations – the need to feed and the problem of hunger, the taste of the food and our inner sensations, the transformative ‘electroweak’ forces used to change the food into an elaborated product, etc.

So the geometric description talks of space-time cycles (closed, frequency cycles) or space-time lines (motions between frequency repetitions of those cyclical actions). The jargon of actions in space and arrows of time is an intermediate jargon proper both of physical and social sciences and the existential jargon is the jargon of relational space-time that applies to all.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time cycles constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms.

And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe. In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind.

In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

**We are made of space-time cycles traced within or between planes of 5th dimension.**

In true form, reality is NOT made of space, but the primary substance is ‘time’, time cycles that break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental theorem of knots and topology), *and that precise game of cyclical forms-motions that break and organize space into vital regions, harnessing its ‘energy-motions’ into forms is all what the Universe is about.*

*Thus relational space-time turns upside down our understanding of the Universe from a mere, simple spatial description where absolute time is a parameter of space, to a cyclical description where space is a slice in the flow of cyclical times, a region surrounded by a time cycle, a ‘path’ in a ‘Lagrangian’ of actions whose final sum is always zero, if we were to use some of the advanced concepts of physics we shall translate to the new paradigm; a ‘moment of present’, in the whole cycle from past to future that closes those paths.*

For the same reason, the minimal unit of reality is NOT a string of space, but an interval of cyclical time, specifically a cyclical ‘action’ with form, a bit of information. In physics from where we have borrowed heavily conceptual and mathematical terms to describe all space-time cycles, the unit is indeed an action of energy and time, which manifests itself in the 3 main U±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanic scales, as a Planck’s action, h, a temperature vibration or a force.

In cellular biology as a circadian cycle of transformation of energy and information, from an ATP to a genetic cycle.

In organic life as an action of feeding, informing, reproducing, evolving socially, moving, ∂a,e,I,o,u.

In society as a similar economic, cultural, social or military action of a nation or civilization.

Space is thus always a ‘minimal’ part of a time cycle.

This Kepler understood when it said that a line is merely a small part (a derived tangent we could say today in calculus) of a curve. This concept, of an infinitesimal part of a longer cycle, which becomes a straight interval, is ultimately the meaning of a present point, which we derive, in the same manner we obtain a Lagrangian worldcycle that sums zero with we integrate.

** EXISTENTIAL ACTIONS: SCALAR ST±4 TRAVELS**

How we travel through scales of the 5th dimension? Through the operations of integration and derivation, which is what makes emerge in an upper scale the physical action.

Now the simplest actions of motion are derivatives of the previous scales which emerge in the higher scale. And we can talk basically of two type of operations:

∂S-4=V-3; ∂V-3=a-2 This simple chain describes the meaning of physical actions. The gravitational scale of the ∆-4 perceived as distant space, gives part of its distance by deviating it in time, emerging as speed in the light-space, atomic scale, which gives part of its speed, by emerging in the upper molecular scale as acceleration and temperature. *So physical parameters are the elements perceived in the actions that emerge between scales.*

But those are ‘pure’ actions of motion, in the spatial dimensions of those lower scales.

We though by the Galilean paradox consider the Sp duality (space perception as pure distance, motion and acceleration, or complex perception as energy).

And so we have also the e-perception of those basic actions, which accordingly is symmetric.

∂E-4=momentum(∆-3); ∂p (momentum)∆-3 = mass (∆-2).

Thus again we observe that the ultimate energy of reality (stored in the distance of strings of gravitational forces, where S≈E, that is strings energy is equivalent to its length), emerges as momentum in the atomic scale and emerges as mass in the upper scales of matter. And so we define also *the main parameters of physics related to the complex energy-mass duality (perception in detail of the components of those scales) in terms of actions.*

The derivatives are also immediate: Energy =1/2Mv², and if we derivate considering V=X, the variable, we obtain the momentum of an atomic particle: ∂x²=2x.

Thus ∂E=mv=p. And again now if we derivate mv, considering v the variable, V=X, ∂p=m.

And we associate S≈E, V≈p and a=m. As we shall see in the specific analysis f the meaning of mass, *mass is considered a vortex of accelerated gravitational form. And this is one of the many parallel ways to deduce this fact. Since ∆ST is a perfectly symmetric complex structure of a beauty, order and balance…*

**The Fractal Universe: qualitative definition.**

What is the Universe? In simple, philosophical terms, a game of ‘motion’ and ‘form’. When you look around you observe ‘*forms in motion’ performing ‘åctions’, which combine both. And nothing else.*

Now call, motion | and form O, and its combination, Ø. And so you could in the simplest possible expression of reality to say that the Universe is ∑ – x O = Ø

This would be the simplest way to define it all. Scientists tend to quantify reality and so they have shunned for too long the explanation of the ‘whys’ of reality, of ‘its qualities’. We do both in ‘philosophy of science’. Now let us try to be more precise with the previous equation.

It could be called ‘speed’, V, a motion in ‘space’, and O could be called a cycle of form, a ‘clock’ of time.

So we could now say the Universe is made of infinite motions in space and cycles of time, combined into infinite åctions. And that is indeed what we perceive. Look around you. Or inside you. Beings perform ‘åctions’ which consist in going ‘cyclically’ to a place, to feed, to inform themselves to meet with other social beings, to reproduce… Actions are cyclical and they are performed through motions, which have certain form. Desargues a mathematician proved that all curves where in fact a combination of the line and cycle that created the cone. Computers use | and O, 1s and 0s, to model the entire Universe.

And if you realize all what is needed to trans-form, a lineal motion into a cyclical clock of time, is to close the ‘string of lineal motion’ into a ‘closed string’ of temporal form. In fact with those 2 elements, open and closed strings physicists construct all the particles of the Universe.

So this is another way to explain the meaning of any System of reality:

‘All what exists in the Universe are systems made of lineal motions of space and cyclical forms of time that trans-form into each other ad eternal throughout åctions that combine both:

∑|xO=Ø’.

**Quantitative definition**

This would be the simplest possible Universe. But then we realize that the motion is not just ‘pure motion’ at least in this plane of existence in which humans develop its åctions. But there is always a ‘being’ that is moving, which from an external point of view tends to be defined by ‘a mass’, an ‘inertia’, a ‘form’ that is fixed and the motion drags through. So we rather say that:

‘All what exits are forms that perform motions with form.’

What is mass so far escapes us at this stage, but all things around us have mass and move dragging their mass, so we should get a bit more complex and consider now that all what we see are masses moving in cyclical patterns around reality. And so we can write this with 3 ‘terms’, one for ‘mass’, M, one for cyclical motion, which is quantized with a term called frequency=1/T (that is the number of times per second a cyclical motion completes its cycle), and a 3rd term called ‘space’, the space traversed in lineal terms from the initial point to the final point. So a being is a mass moving from point A to B in space and performing in time cyclical trajectories: M x L x T ‾ ¹

As it happens, physicists describe all what exists in this plane of reality with only those 3 parameters, M, L and T, and have a fundamental postulate, that the quantity of M x L x T ‾ ¹ of the Universe which they call ‘momentum’, remains invariant when we add all the momentums of all the beings of the Universe.

And so the quantitative way to express the qualitative nature of the Universe is rather simple too: The Universe is a game of ‘momentums’ in perpetual exchange of motion and form.

The reader would observe at this point that humans use a lot of ‘different’ concepts, which at the end tend to be reduced to motion and form. And this a problem of humans which love to make specific definitions, attach differentiating terms, break reality according to quantitative methods, classify, divide and confuse.

The Universe though works in a different manner, it breaks, quantizes and multiplies into:

- An infinite myriad of varieties or Ø-åctions, the 2 essential realities it is made of:
- Lineal motions that expand and create open lines and planes of space.

- And O-cyclical motions or ‘forms’, which shrink, warp and close into time clocks.

So if we want truly to understand what reality is made of. We must depart from those essential things. And called the Universe a ‘fractal’ which iterates and combines lineal motions of Space, and cyclical clocks of time into infinite åctions. We can now change from the intuitive geometric symbols to the conventions of man and so write Se (for Space) and Tƒ (for cyclical clocks of time) our equation:

Se x Tƒ = A.

And this is the simplest way to explain it.

**The combinations of motions and forms.**

What makes though the Universe so confusing is the fact that it constantly messes motion and form. And so at least in this plane of existence there is nothing ‘pure’. This the old Taoists, the philosophers of antiquity that understood in simpler closer terms this reality, calling motion yang which they represented with a ___ and form yin, which they represented with a O or a broken line — (with more form than __), make it clear, when affirming that no yin exists without a bit of yang, and no yang exists without a bit of yin, and that reality, existence was a game of combinations of yin and yang that created the infinite beings of reality.

**The o±4 plane.**

So we are obliged to use the purest terms of motion and form, only when dealing with the purest concept of pure Space without form in nature vacuum space and pure cyclical clocks of time without any translatinv motion, pure rotatory clocks, in nature, black holes in the cosmic scales and superfluid 0 K vortices of mass and charges without any vibration. And as it happens we cannot perceive those limits of pure motion without form and pure form without motion, pure Space and Time.

Now I shall call our ‘plane of existence’, where I exist. the individual, human plane, the ∆-plane. And so this remote plane which I don’t even perceive, will be called the 0±4 planes, the ∆-4 plane that of far away forces with zero form, the gravitational plane, and the plane of remote black holes with maximal form at 0 K, which I don’t perceive either the ∆+4. It is only logic to call them with the same ± number, because as it happens, the gravitational plane of absolute motion with no form (called for that reason non-local or ‘action at distance’) is created by the plane of absolute form with no motion (called for that reason a black hole).

How this is done is obvious. Remember that we said all what exists are O x | = Ø. So what happens here is this

O (black holes) emit, |, gravitational space, which other O black hole will absorb, creating between both a gravitational attractive force. So we write:

[O (Tƒ) < = > O]±4.

Where we have added the plane in which this happens to know what varieties of ‘form’ and ‘motion’ we are talking about.

The duality of distance and motion, cycle and form.

Now, because we do not see this gravitational lines and we do not see this perfect cycles, but they are there, they must appear somehow to us. And they do so, lines of pure motion are seen as ‘distances’, and cycles of pure rotational cyclical motion are seen as ‘masses’ and ‘spherical forms’. We can picture how this happens, since we have two elementary realities, the Tƒ cyclical clock (which we perceive as fixed form, like when we see a very fast turning wheel that we see as a fixed form) and the – of space, which we can see as distance or motion, as we see fast cars in a picture at night as fixed lines or motion.

This is thus an important law of reality we call the Galilean paradox: when we do not see in detail a lineal motion a speed it appears as distance, and when we do not see in detail a cyclical clock of time, a rotary motion, we see it as a mass of form. So Galileo didn’t see the motion of the Earth but only the distance it travelled around the sun, neither its rotation but only its mass-form, and yet it was there: e pur si muove e pur no muove.

So we must make two equivalences:

Lineal motion = Space distance; Rotary motion = Time Clock.

And so we see either motions, lineal speeds and rotary clocks of time, or fixed distances and forms.

And the result is the stable combination or ‘space-time’ reality we see around us.

Further on an interesting deduction of the fact we do NOT see gravitational motion, is that it must appear to us as infinite ‘non local or action at distance, as physicists call it.

Indeed, if we consider the equation of :

– x O = Øst, whereas Øst is the constant space-time we see around us. For Øst to be constant, since O the form we see is zero, none, the – element must be infinite.

As the only quantity multiplied by 0 that gives as a constant value is ∞:

∞ x 0 = C. And this is indeed what we experience: gravitational forces have zero form, and are infinite in its motion from the human perspective. We do not mean they are necessarily infinite in objective terms, but for humans they are infinite in motion, non local, ‘acting at distance’, the neat expression physicists used for centuries without reasoning why.

Now we bring this solution because I believe the reader trained in ‘quantitative’ methods will surely miss the essential element of ∆ST – to mix logic reasoning and mathematical equations to achieve a much more complex, rich and meaningful understanding of the Universe with all its languages, not only as an abstract concoction of mathematical formulae. The previous ‘sample case’ is a simple, clear proof of that power of ∆ST to enlighten our comprehension of all realities.

**The ∆-3 scale.**

So in the next stage of reality, beyond this ∆-plane of existence that we do not perceive, which we shall call, the 0±4 Plane, of pure forces of motion, ‘gravitational forces’, ∆-4, and pure form without motion, ‘cosmic black holes’ or 0±4, the rest of realities are ‘messed up’. Their motions have some form and their forms have some motion. And so they are all Ø-species. And we call them ‘waves’.

Indeed, when we come to the minimal reality we perceive, we realize it is made of pure motions which have a bit of form, that is their ‘lines of space in motion’, their gravitational lines curve up and down as they move linearly’, and they become ‘transversal waves’ of light. And then alas! they are now ‘light-space’, forms in motion, forms in action, in-form-åctions, in-form-ations. And so ‘light-space’ carries information, and it is the ‘limit of our perception’. And we call this plane of existence, which is the first we perceive the ∆-3 plane of electronic light. The beginning of the human universe. And so the myths of the bible said ‘and God said, there is light’ and creation started. Indeed, when gravitational forces of the ∆-4 scale warp into transversal waves, which carry information, or ‘light-space’, we enter reality.

This ‘light space’ in turn will be made by ∆-3 galaxies, which produce this light space.

And we call them the ∆+3 plane according to our terminology of planes of existence.

And so if we look at it from the ‘smallish’ point of view, the ∆-3 plane is made of the components of most of the matter of the galaxy: plasma particles, electrons and protons in ionized state, mixed up with electromagnetic fields of light. And from the larger point of view we will be talking of galaxies.

They are the next clear thing beyond the Universe and its dark matter, dark energy and dark black holes we do not see

Now here, we shall by ‘isomorphism’ (similarity) with the ∆-4 scale consider some facts, which have escaped for very long the work of physicists in their understanding of reality.

If we have said that the space of the ∆-4 scale is actually pure motion, seen as distance by lack of detail, the space of galaxies, must be made of light, which we do see, but not with enough detail to perceive its motion, and so we also perceive ‘light-space’ as distance. This is our ‘space’ and accordingly the space we see has exactly the same 3 perpendicular, Euclidean components that light have because both are the same:

In the graph, we can see this straightforward. It is not a coincidence that the 3 elements of light, its magnetic, electric fields and its speed are perpendicular to each other as our ‘Euclidean space is’. This physicists do not really understand, because they just do quantification with maths, and as Feynman famously put it, ‘the why’ is the only thing physicists do not ask. Curiously enough philosophers did understand, so Kant said that our space-light is Euclidean, and Descartes said we see the ‘world’ of light with Euclidean coordinates in his book ‘the world’, and draw the Cartesian space-time graph of light space. And artists understood it, so the impressionists said they paint light when they paint space. Again an important insight by using more than numbers to explain reality.

Next the equation with our geometric symbolism of this scale, will be also rather simple;

[O < ≈ > O]0±3

In simple terms, a ‘particle’ or ‘star’ or ‘galaxy’ with cyclical form O, produces a wave ≈ of light space, which another O-being will perceive and absorb. (Remember at this time we do see and all systems that emit light do perceive; your mind is nothing but a bunch of electrons perceiving light).

Remembers also that we have said the Universe has only 2 ultimate simple elements, O and – and its infinite Ø combinations, but it likes to iterate them, repeat them, mix them together, group them in huge numbers. So that equation can mean an extraordinary number of beings of different sizes. The most common interpretation when we enter in detail will be that of Physicists, which they call the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

O-Fermion particle < Boson Force > O-Fermion particle.

Where a fermion, electron or quark will emit a boson a gamma ray and another fermion will absorb it.

There are a few other varieties of ‘forces’ and ‘fermions’ but roughly speaking without entering in detail this ‘is it’. (Remember this blog has 3 ‘planes of explanation’ the upper line very general and encyclopedic, resumes the entire thing; so if you read it you will have a generic vision of the whole reality but still a bit fogged, this second line of isomorphisms, gives you more detail and the 3rd line dedicated to each plane with very detailed references to scientific laws of each species, do connect fully with simplex sciences).

- Now the second thing physicists do know but again interpret in too abstract ways, is the fact that the equation works both sides: the electron produces a boson – a photon of light that moves through a transversal wave that carries motion and form, and gets to another electron, where it collapses being absorbed by the electron into a dense photonic form, which becomes part of the nebulae of the electron.

Thus what happens here which they describe with mathematical artifacts called probabilities in quantum equations they do not know what they mean, is clear, if you are not ‘cuckoo’ about having weird interpretations of reality that make you sound very smart and reinforce your beliefs in an only-mathematical Universe. This i know will irritate physicists, people which as the adults of ‘le petit prince’ believe they know everything and don’t see the elephant in the hut. Well, Schrodinger who discovered all this, first told us that the electron is smeared all over the place. And it is. it is made of very dense boson light photons that collapse from ≈ state into O-state, and come together into the nebulae we see.

Now, when we observe them, with even bigger particles, the smeared electron, collapses further into a tighter ball, as it happens when any system of nature made of fractal points (anything is a fractal point, a number, a group of any set of beings), receives a massive interfering attack from outside. Flocks of birds, schools of fishes, armies spread on a battle field, collapse into tighter configurations when a predator eagle, a shark, an enemy come to attack them.

So the densely packed photons of the electron nebulae collapse, around the point where there is a maximal density at this moment of dense photons and become a particle point, when the killer electron of the microscope bombs it. Simple enough to explain in a perfectly intelligent manner, the weird things – not so weird if you believe in the isomorphism=equality of all systems of the universe – and have been a soldier, or have seen a school of fishes, a bird flock, a herd in the savanna, an at hill – that happen in quantum physics.

This is what it happens: nebulae of densely packed groups of photons, spread to form together ∑∆-1 photons = ∆-electrons gather around the denser point of the flock in the moment the observer’s electron bomb it, and so quantum physicists say that point is the most probable point to find the electron as a particle-point. And they are puzzled because they never detect the nebulae but a particle point, so they unable to grasp the vitality of the entire universe affirm that the nebulae is a mathematical reality made of probabilities of finding the electron. Yes, each point will have a probability according to its density, as the probability that a school, a flock, an army or an ant group gathers in a point is proportional to the density of that point prior to the attack, as it is the fastest way to become a ball, coming together where there are already a lot of points. Point.

So this is enough to know now about this plane and its equations.

Tƒ mention though that because light has information, form, it is no longer infinite in speed. It must have a limited speed, because now we see it so, O x – = Constant Øst does not need to be infinite. Further on, because what is happening here is that light ‘draws’ space-motion, as it has to draw a curve is slower. Indeed, the fastest distance between two points is a line, a wave is slower than a line, as it has a longer trajectory. So light has a limit of speed. It is called c-speed, and is huge but limited.

However, this distance-speeds of light once they abandon the galaxy, no longer are in the light-space realm so they start to elongate, becoming red waves, the ones with longer distance per wavelength, and hence they start to accelerate, which we see as an increase of space-distance, and so between galaxies space-distance grows at an accelerated rate as the light expands space, and this again physicists measure but don’t understand, it is the expansion of light space. We could say that light space dies into the gravitational strings it was made of. And so the immortal, infinite black holes and gravitational infinite distances of the Universe now warp into light which have a finite light-space speed and a finite time duration as it is born from a pure motion that warps into form and then spreads out again when abandoning the galaxy into pure motion again:

– > ≈ < – and this is a life cycle. Notice now the 2 symbols we add here which are visual also: > which means something with more distance, collapses into a point, and this is the symbol of creation of form, of formation, of in-form-ation, and on the other side < is the symbol of expansion of form into motion, or entropy.

And here again those to dynamic process of change in time, are ‘called appropriately the two arrow of time -> and <-, information and entropy. Physicists unfortunately only recognize one, the bad one, <- entropy expansive motions, which is the reason they say the Universe is dying. Because they only study the space between galaxies. It seems silly, very dumb, but physicists beyond manipulating equations and making machines to perceive reality are very dumb. Sorry that is ‘a fact’. Or rather very arrogant in their conclusions (which makes them be very dumb)

Fact is the whole Space-time, remember O x – =Øst is in perpetual balance.

So the expansion of accelerated light space between galaxies is compensated by the warping of light space into photons, then electrons and matter within galaxies, which is so evident looking at those galaxies corrugating light space into warping black holes, that one wonders how blind physicists can be?

They seem to see the only thing nobody sees, dark expanding space and they do not seem to see what all of us see, warping galaxies. And so:

∑ (O-galaxies < ≈–≈> O) is the equation for the sum of all the galaxies emitting expansive light, ≈ which becomes gravitational faster distances, – between galaxies and then reenter another galaxy and collapses.

Easy. Now you can throw in to that model all the correct equations of quantum physics, relativity and cosmology and you will get the details. The whys are only in this blog.

**Some clarifications on physical errors.**

All this brings us to the almost impossible need to correct ‘physical concepts’ which truly deform in favor of action, motion and other fundamental traits of the worldly religion of physicists (to make weapons and of late machines that use energy to move) that have transpired to all sciences.

Consider for example, my lost battle to redefine and reduce the concept of energy to entropic, lineal motion transfers.

In physics, the fundamental concept is ‘energy’, which never changes. This is its fundamental law.

For long I have tried to ‘change’ that ‘enclose-∆- all saint grail concept’ of energy, and reduce it to a mere ‘transfer’ of lineal, spatial motion, and redefine the principle as ‘lineal energy motions constantly transform into cyclical informative motions back and forth’. But I realize this has only produced rejection from physicists that have the big issue of arrogance – that is, trying to explain everything else with the specific limits of material systems. So i am into the painful, long process of rewriting every time i put ‘energy’, and substitute it for ‘entropy’, the spatial, expansive arrow of motion. To physicists in that sense all is entropy and informative life processes are called ‘negantropy’, not information, the arrow they ignore.

So they do with the ‘Reprod-Active’ 3^{rd} present arrow of repetitive åctions that combine energy, sorry entropy and information, and when repeated many times, reproduce a system. Entropy only physics, its biggest conceptual error though makes sense in external physical systems, where most changes are changes in motion in space. In this view, ‘energy’ which they basically define as a transfer of lineal motion through the formula of Work (that only takes the lineal direction in which the force is applied as the component of motion).

And there, they include also potential energy, stored in the form, or information of systems, from mass Sp=mc2, to position (in a gravitational field). Thus in physics ‘energy’ is really all, it is the existential force of the system, as it includes both its ‘kinetic energy’ (which is the concept i had failed to reduce energy to), but also ‘form’, vortices-clocks of accelerated time, charge and masses, which transform their form into ‘kinetic energy’.)

The reader of these texts therefore should forgive the author who calls ‘entropy’ energy, expansive lineal motion.

As physicists are the popes of science, we yield to them, and I will correct in the future all those terms of ‘energy’ and substitute them for entropy. And we will use the physical concept of ‘energy’ as existential force, Max. Sp X Tƒ, of a system. Which is really what they mean when they say mass is a form of energy. In true ‘form’ is not, Mass is a vortex of information, the particle state of the cosmic Universe, and energy is its opposite variety. So the reader should realize this minor error, and read ‘entropy’ when I say energy, a word I will try to eliminate.** **

**EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things though are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

**SOCIOLOGICAL SCALES**** **

**∆o**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

** ****We are an integration of space-time cyclical åctions performed across those o±4 planes of existence.**

*A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:*

*O-1, ∑O-1>Si<ST>Tƒ<<So-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.*

*If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (æ,e,ï,œ,û) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being.*

We need now to see how space-time fields, ‘lines with motion’, momentums, the commonest st manifold, either an Le (Long-energy-entropy), Tƒ, Tall Information and Wa, Wide-Reprod-active Wave bidimensional system with an spatial and temporal dimension.

Now the bidimensional ST systems follow the natural laws of topology, and are a bidimensional motion, perceived as a line of space with a speed that will define in an external field its ‘reproduction of information’ as it traces its motions in the external absolute space-time.

The simplicity of integrating a worldcycle path on those 3 bidimensional systems

Worldcycle, similar to a Hamiltonian

3 W = ∫ Le x Tƒ d(st) = ∑ a = 0

Any world cycle: W, thus will transit through the existential ±,∫ æ,e,ï,œ,û, åctions of the being with different increasing length of time and space.

The motions in ∂a, accelerated, decelerated and steady state caused by the perceptive åctions, ∂I, which have perceive external cycles and accumulated it in logic thoughts to enact them in the future, are directed towards a field of energy, from where to extract bits of existential momentum to deliver forceful impulse into the future.

All this mechanical åctions though have a clear goal> Energy is always transformed into potential forms of information. Which is the new principle of internal and external energy:

Sp = External Energy (kinetic energy), internal-external energy (internal energy of the external Universe: Potential Energy) + Internal energy (vital energy and cyclical information of the being)

Is a quantity which is conserved. Since it includes angular momentum, lineal momentum, we can perceive in this manner different conservation laws of physics.

Where the worldcycle function of relative present, ∑ or W, for width-summation, will be constantly used to represent the constant steady state balanced space-time function, made of åctions

in a wide analytic equation, would give us obviously a lot of information on the system. Enough to say now that the 3 variation space-time fields are simplified by the fact that almost always Length-entropy, height-information and width-reproduction follow this harmony simplification of bidimensional space-time fields.

There are though also other inverted functions, for example, an Lo dimension, which is a cycloid, a cyclical wheel which moves along a lineal path tracing an 8 Radius longer wave cycle, combination of both.

The body wave, reproductive Past x future, energy x information, system is thus the more complex, variable and interesting of all of them.

And we could consider its worldcycle between birth and extinction, form its first beat of existence to its last, the ‘present existence’ of a being. We are bodies, our heads in the future with information are invisible particles, our limbs absorb its energy and information from the external Universe with its hyperbolic openings, but the being is its body-wave, its reproductive organ for whom the being mostly exists.

Of the 5 åctions of existence, reproduction, the preservation of the relative present is the highest of all mandates.

In existential algebra we write:

Present (angular momentum: Mvr, in physical equations, or ‘action’) = Past (energy) x Future (information), whose operational functions, of which the Hamiltonian, Lagrangian are the most relevant of physics, try to combine this anti-symmetric equation (as both are inverse functions, hence Past / Future = Constant.

Now if we are calculating past x future, whereas Past = Constant Future, P = C x F.

And we would obtain:

*Present*= Constant x Future x Future =*C F*^{2}

A fundamental equation of all time Physics.

While for Past we can calculate:

Past = C F

And obviously Future = F

It is then interesting to observe that knowing the future, measuring the future space-time point (external or internal of a being) allow us to deduce the past, and relatively consider the Present, which will be more variable (as now the future has 2 possible solutions from the present point, as there are in fact 2 possible decisions to be made in the present. That is, the present can choose to increase any of its 2 components future information or past energy.

This always-dual solution to a point of space-time or first degree of freedom increases the external uncertainty on when the point of time, will make discontinuous its cycles of space-time action, switching to another different active integral path, that might even cancel the first.

Entities thus travel through a multiple Universe with different regions with different dimensions. How travel through such 5^{th} dimensional fractal Universe filled with nested sub-universes of different symmetric past and present and future, Sp, A, O, dimensions of spacetime

The relationship between a bidimensional space field and a bidimensional time cycle, is also a 2-manifold.

However cutting each other with a single dimension of connection as they intersect in a creative wave-particle encounter, is fundamentally an A x Sp, Active magnitude x accelerating field of kinetic energy (perceived as its derivative speed by the active magnitude) : M x V – a momentum.

A second fundamental new element of cyclical time is the cyclical nature of the relative fractal past-present-future dimensions of space time, in world cycles which means that the future return to the past by means of the action of death.

Past x Future = Present-> Energy x Information -> wave-reproduction/momentum, is the kind of new quantized time equations that will be able to reveal an enormous numbers of facts and whys of science.

Now the study of that previous equation, which is the perception of the Universe, from a different time frame of reference, *as if the past and the future co-exist together in the manufacturing of present, as it actually happiness in reality, creating an immortal Universe in a perpetual present is a high discipline of physics of time.*

Since to exist through åctions that ensure the immortality of the system, by absorption and reproductive emission of energy and information is the fundamental purpose of time cycles.

Thus we shall elaborate its concept, as it is truly in the ‘åctions of space-time’ that all beings perform, where we shall find the whys of the Universe.

Thus the whys of reality are the active, biological purposes of most time cycles, performed by existential beings, whose geometric forms drawn in space are secondary to the ‘biological functional nature’ of those ‘space-time åctions’.

Since those cycles will be the 5 ‘drives of existence’ that ensure the entity:

– ∫o, perceptive, gauging, to move towards…

– ∂a: accelerated fields where

– ∂e, to feed in energy, and store it to.

≈i, reproduce and achieve immortality within

±∫u: a social stronger group.

And those topo-biological whys, performed by all kind of systems, including physical systems to ensure mechanically or vegetative its survival.The sum of all the planes of increasing information of parts that become wholes, of knots of space-time cycles that are joined by networks into systems and super organisms IS the arrow of SCALAR SPACE-TIME, or relative 5th dimension (if we consider the 4 classic ones of physics though as we shall see this is a simplistic confusing nomenklatura, better substituted by the ternary symmetries between space topology, S, time age, T, and space-time scale, ∆ which is a future time arrow ∑∆>∆+1, of eusocial evolution, of potential forms, which might or might not happen but if happening will have certain non-Æ forms that are set as the most efficient survival forms of a given ternary topology of existence.

So a being will be the sum of all the planes and super organisms, floating and occupying a limited domain of that dimension, as its internal knots trace its world cycles, sum of fractal quantum motions, or ‘∆-1 actions’ of the being in its internal space, as they transfer energy and information from the outer, ∆+1 world:

∆=∫∆±1

Whereas a being, ∆, is the sum of exchanges of energy and information between its outer world, ∆+1, and its inner world, ∑∆-1, which is what beings do through its existence: absorb and emit energy and information between its inner world and outer world.

In this experience the being will show 2 selfish arrows of accumulation of energy and information in its internal territories and at the same time trying to minimise its output of both:

Max. Spe x Tiƒ

Yet the mind, Œ≈Ø, function (in timeT: Œ and space: Ø), of the being while trying to maximise its body energy and mind information it might exchange in unfavourable conditions with larger stronger wholes, and by the simple reason that wholes are more than Is in space-time size and volume, finally loose the game of existence and loose its capacity to regenerate its energy, collapsing into death.

Min. Spe x Tiƒ: Max. Spe x O Tiƒ=Death equation.

Thus an existential cycle ends with the fall back into dissolution of the being that existed and that ultimate reality: that all existences in time are closed zero point travels between 3 planes of the 5th dimension, resumes all reality:

**Life death cycle: its 3 ages is a trip across 3 co-invariant scales of the 5th dimension**

So we talk of a 5th dimension, which orders reality according to its growing sizes, and paradoxically, slower time motions. As we grow in space we diminish in speed, and yet both properties put together are invariant:

**Λ. 5D metric:** Sp x Tƒ =Constant; Sp= K/Tƒ ; Sp (Past-energy) < Present-iteration: Sp x Tƒ>Tƒ future information;

|-Sp (energy age, field, gas, youth) > Sp x Ti (liquid, adult, wave, reproductive age)>Tƒ (3rd age, particle solid) <<Sp (death).

All systems do travel through the 5th dimension performing 3 basic motions:

- Present translations performing time actions in space, along the same Universal plane.

- Past, transfer of energy and information upwards towards higher social scales.

- And transfers of energy and information downwards.

Those 3 motions, performed in infinitesimal, indivisible cycles made of tics of time and quanta of energetic space form together a sequential world cycle of life and death – as the point is a super organism in existential mode.

And so the integration of all those motions through the world cycle, Ω, of the whole system, in a life-death duration. Yet the same structures considered in space, gave us a ternary form, or super organism, made of energetic, reproductive and informative parts. And so departing from a single Œ point, through its existential travels and synchronicities, we can tell the tale of the Universe: the creation and extinction of wholes from parts, which perform space-time actions, which are motions that exchange energy and information through the 5th dimension.

And so the motions of each point of each scale can all be traced and included in a larger frame of reference of multiple space-time symmetries.

It is though needed to understand how the arrows o information and energy emerge and download between the fractal planes of the 5th dimension. Hence we need a 3rd symmetry to fully grasp the behaviour of the species of the Universe.

**DIMENSIONAL**** CREATION**

**Dimensions are motions perceived as stillness.**

What is the 5^{th} dimension? We shall latter consider in depth better definitions of key concepts, so poorly explained in present science, such as ‘dimension’, ‘motion’, ‘time’ and ‘space’. Now we shall just enunciate their meaning.

Consider the *Paradox of Galileo*, the key logic concept to understand the meaning of dimensions, astoundingly ignored by science for 400 years: ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’, which can be enlarged to this question: ‘why we see everything still, if all what we study in a quantum scale has motion?’

The answer given by quantum physics that we shall expand further to all scales is *the law of complementarity*: ‘all what exists is still and has motion *at the same time*; all is a ‘particle’ and a ‘wave’’, *but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either, but not both, dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state.*

Thus, we apply this duality to the definition dimensions: dimensions are both, an extension of fixed space, perceived as motion or a motion ‘perceived as fixed space’. For example, the ultimate space of the Universe, vacuum, is teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); Galaxies separate from each other at huge speeds but we see their ‘motion’ as an expansion of space…Thus:

*‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance’.*

Hence dimensions can be generated by motions of particles and reproductions of waves. In the lower scale of string theory we can describe those dimensions as the reproduction of strings. But what matters to us is the vacuum of our scale of space-time; *which can be seen as electromagnetic motion at c-speed, since it is filled of light and background radiation, or as vacuum space.*

This duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we perceive a car moving also as a fixed line of distance in a night picture, or the duality of stop and go of a film camera, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It explains the generation of dimensions:

A point with motion creates a line dimension; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion creates a mass-volume and a volume in motion creates a life-cycle or world-cone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4^{th} dimension of time.

The reader might notice that those motions become perceived by human senses as a duality of motion-stillness, so the 1^{st} dimension is seen as speed, the second, a plane or sheet of information as the page you are reading as ‘still form’ or information the 3^{rd}, a volume or mass becomes again a stillness, and the 4^{th} a world line, which *is substituted by a time cycle, as motion again. Thus again the past, the 5 ^{th} dimension becomes ‘still’ and the future, the 6^{th} dimension, an uncertain motion.*

Indeed, theoretically, prior to Absolute Relativity there were in physics only 3 dimensions of space and one of time.

But under the duality of the Paradox of Galileo, in reality those 3 dimensions of space are also motions. And indeed, it is obvious at quantum scale that ‘space’ is really a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies.

This also applies to our scale. So if we consider the motion of a gas, volume is proportional to that motion/temperature: PxV=knT. But volume is space; so space grows as motion grows. And it applies to the aforementioned cosmic scale of galaxies moving/creating distances.

Moreover we observe that each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the world-cone the plane.

Can we extend this growing game of dimensions in motion that create a new dimension? Yes, we can, when we do a proper analysis of what the 4^{th} dimension of time in General Relativity really means – something which as most definitions of physics is far better understood in mathematical terms than in logic, conceptual ones. Indeed, physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond the 3^{rd} dimension our ‘senses’ spatialize, by creating the stillness of light-space, all other dimensions are perceived as motions in time. Hence there are not ‘weird’ impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3^{rd} one of ‘volume’, for reasons that go beyond this introductory lesson on Absolute Relativity.

*Physicists spatialize time, in terms of its ‘present’ dimension.*

Few physicists understand that time has also 3 dimensions, since they only study ‘simultaneous measures’, mathematically described with derivatives, ∂t, which are an ‘instant of time’; that is, a slice of present in the total flow of the 5^{th}-6^{th} dimensions.

This was further proved by Einstein’s Relativity a theory, which is concerned with the values of ‘simultaneous measures of space-time’, hence with the values of a relative ‘present time’.

This concept of present time derives from Galileo’s measure of speed, V=s/t, ∂s/∂t; hence ∂t=∂s/v. which is the meaning of time in standard physics.

Time is defined then in terms of space and speed (which are according to the paradox of Galileo, similar concepts of fixed space or motion space). Hence physics ‘spatializes time’; and vice versa. In those terms, *space is just the perception of present time in simultaneity. Or in words of Einstein:*

*‘Space is measure from a simultaneous frame of reference’.*

Thus physical time, ∂t, only shows a very limited ‘dharma’, or part of the entire flow of time from past (the fifth dimension) to future (the sixth dimension). In physics the fourth dimension is only present time, which is what the Riemannian geometries of Einstein’s and Minkowski’s models of space-time study.

Time though as any child knows before it learns General Relativity, has not only the present time, the spatial ‘dharma’, or slice of the flow of time that ‘freezes’ in the field equations of Einstein. Space is a fixed perception of a time motion.

Thus, all systems *must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. *Then both will be an equivalent perspective on the same event.

Now with those concepts clear, the 5^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions can be defined both in space and time, as all other dimensions can be.

*The 5 ^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions in space.*

Then there is the 5th and the 6th dimension of time, past and future. And while this might seem trivial, it is the beginning of a true r=evolution on our understanding of it.

In space the 5^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions refer to the fractal scales from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, where the human scale will be considered the border between both, for reasons that will become clear when we define them in time.

And the main properties of those scales, *each of them a discontinuous space-time in itself, are the self-similarities and invariances of form that happen between them and give origin to its absolute relativity.*

Since we shall find the same topological forms when we ‘evolve’ from one scale to another.

Yet since form is function, we will find also the same functions in each scale. For example, in all scales we will find clock-like cyclical forms that pack information, from informative particles to human heads to robotic ones.

Finally the relationships between any given ‘I’ scale and its i-1 and i+1 smaller and bigger scales are always the same. So the relationship between cells, animals and ecosystems (the 3 scales of biological beings) can be formalized with the same laws that the relationships between 3 other scales, such as particles, atoms and molecules (3 scales of physical beings) and so on.

*The 5 ^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions in time.*

From a time perspective, reality has not only 3 dimensions of space, but also 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future. And the relationship between those scales perceived in space and in time is simple, but deeply meaningful to understand the complex Universe

– The scales of the 5^{th} dimension, simpler than the human scale are ‘the relative past’ if we consider an arrow of complexity and social evolution. So particles were born before atoms born before molecules born before cells born before men born before societies. As each new scale is made of quantic networks of ‘smaller beings’ of the previous scale. So without cells man cannot exist and without molecules cells cannot and so on.

– On the other hand the scales of the 6^{th} dimension, more complex than the human individual are scales of a relative future.

– And in between there is our scale or relative present, which exists as the dominant scale of reality, ‘now’.

It is then needed to separate past from future, just because we humans are in the present? Yes. Since in complex time theory, we shall find that the f*uture is constantly calculated and chosen among many futures , while the past is already a single one. Thus the future is potentially including all possible pasts, as the past contains all the presents that were.*

Yet for you to grasp fully that structure we need to do some clarification on the nature of time in physics and expand those notions to define ‘cyclical time’ and the concepts of relative past, present and future in terms of the density of information of a system, which is proportional to its duration in time.

**The 5 ^{th} & 6^{th} dimensions in all sciences: causal logic and forecasting.**

Science deals mostly with the total flow of time. Since, scientific laws consist in finding patterns in the events caused by a certain being, which will repeat those events called ‘actions’, once and again – fact, this which allows all sciences to predict the future, as we know where the sun will be next year – same repetitive cycle; and so on.

Thus while time in physics is mainly (but not only) related to the study of present space, in most sciences time is related to the understanding of the causal flows and cyclical patterns from the past used to forecast the future, according to those previous cycles of the past.

We conclude that the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions are mainly the realm of causality and duality, of logic and evolutionary science, of bio-logical sciences, which have had much more success than physicists in exploring long ‘time’ ranges with evolutionary and organic, morphological theories about how information, form, changes with time.

Both works on time, Relativity and Evolution must be fusioned and that is the path of the future of science. And the theory that fusions them is not physics neither biology but the sciences that study both together, general systems sciences, whose formalism I developed in the past 2 decades as an Independent Researcher and explained in a series of lectures on the international congresses of Systems sciences (1).

General Systems Sciences could be a good name for it, complexity other, Absolute Relativity a third one. But let us call it only the study of the 5^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions of time in depth, as physicists study only present derivatives of time and evolutionists have not understood fully the morphological laws of evolution, its limits and repetitive patterns.

All this said is evident that science has always been concerned with the understanding of the 5^{th} dimension of past, its patterns and cycles to be able to forecast the 6^{th} of future, through the laws of causality that creates the future, departing from the past, through a series of ‘quantum dharmas’, simultaneous measures, perceptive stills of reality called presents

This is indeed the central question of knowledge – to know the causality of the past and how to extend it to understand the future:

Why things exist and become extinct in time, how they are created and assembly themselves in space, shaping ever more complex systems – in brief how the social networks, systems and scales of the Universe emerge into ‘being’ with self-similar laws, forming the discontinuous space-time intervals of the fifth dimension.

The interplay of those dimensions and form generate the Universe:

Now, in those graphs we can see the most classic ‘generation’ of ‘meanings’ in the Universe, by combining the 2 ‘forms’, the line and the cycle, and the two ‘motions’, the lineal motion and the cyclical one (and its SxT combinations of waves and hyperbolic bodies).

If we restrict to that first generation, and consider |-S <≈> O-T, to be the essential duality, we can study its combinations.

A perfect, still, lineal, ‘extended space’ with no motion and no perceivable form: |-S, or space.

A still cyclical form, or with minimal motion, as information. A lineal motion, entropy or with min. form, energy. STe,i

A perfect cyclical form or’Time clock, To.

As the Universe starts to mess rhythms of motions that decelerate and expand into space, becoming still or accelerate inwards and become cyclical motions of time. As the observer changes its perspective enlarging and hence stretching cycles into lines of lesser curvature, and vice versa, the forms of the Universe also change. The graph shows our choice of 4 words to explain them, |-Space, res extensa with no perceivable motion, O-Mind, still cyclical form, |-entropy, expanding motion and O-Time, accelerated cyclical motion, and the somewhat more conceptual, less defined, energy (tending to lineal motion but with form) and information (tending to cyclical form that with motion), where we ‘put in’ as humans do, in a similar conceptualisation to that of spaces and times, the two inverse elements of the Universe.

Thus it must be cleared, that the logic equations of the Universe are fractal, conceptual, dualities, based in inversions and symmetries of two poles that come together vibrating into 3 points, of Max. S≈E, Max. T≈I, S=T, E=I, of maximal, minimal and balanced states, ages, forms.

This is the game, 2 limiting functions, opposite to each other, of relative past and future, combining into relative present, E=I balanced points.

THE UNIVERSE IS NOT A QUANTITATIVE BUT A LOGIC NOT A MATERIAL BUT SPIRITUAL GAME, and the quantitative and material reality and perception of the game as such comes only AFTER.

**The 3rd and 4th postulate: Social networks**

It is now when we can consider what those points do beyond the couple formation: the answer is obvious, the create social groups, networks, which seem plane but are quantized as flows of ‘—motions’ and form communicated between two poles (perceived as energy and information, as they ‘transit’ through a relative ‘active support’ of mass-charges-vortices of time).

Those poles that create through a relative support or ‘field of energy and information’, flows of entropic ‘—motions’ carrying cyclical frequencies of form, which communicate between points codified languages that express a common will to absorb energy and information, ‘—motions’ and form. This is what points do: *to absorb ‘—motions’ and form, to move and perceive, to enact their will of existence, and repeat, reproduce their existential momentum, their existential force:
*Max. Sp x Tƒ < ∑s x t (s≈t).

Why, who, when just by survival chance? this program was imposed we do not know. But the natural enactment of the program is to increase the network flows between points to create bidimensional waves, that become relative S-T planes susceptible of being excited by, and carry and reproduce a certain wave of energy and information, ST=s x t, an existential being.

In the subtle commanding flows of reality, it remains to be understood if the larger ST field forces the existence of certain smaller se<=>to beings codes the smaller being or vice versa. In any case, as the points share actions of energy and information, similar to their selves, an ∑∆-1 dense flow of energy and information surrounds a network, which starts to pop up self-reproductions of itself, which will constantly share energy and information as they keep reproducing and tying up networks of communication. To that aim all growing network of similar cells must have access to a simpler field of quanta of energy which they can absorb and mild into themselves, and for that their larger existential force, as wholes will ease the task.

As the networks become denser they will finally self-organize themselves socially into a whole, with a hierarchy of ‘organization’ along S=10 scales of social growth, in which cells will specialize in the ternary 3 x 3 sub-systems of entropic, informative and reproductive tasks, and emerge as ones of new decametric scales. Networks thus grow both in the 3rd and fourth dimension of space-time, filling up a space-time plane but in the social growth of its elements, and its fractal diminution into smaller cellular scales. This ‘invagination’ of an initial being through the program of absorption of energy and information, replication of form and social evolution: ∆o->∆a->∆e->∆i->∆U, is what we call the program of existence:

Points perceive to orientate (∆o) its motions with accelerations and decelerations and change of orientation, ∆a, which allow the being to feed on energy, ∆e, in order to reproduce its systems either individually or sexually to iterate itself, ∆i, and then evolve socially into ∆ Universal new single planes of existence. The program of existence of the being thus make it grow constantly, and by growing, its ‘Generator Equation’, which represents its complementary systemic nature, its ternary elements and on the whole its ‘existential force’, that is its spatial energy, temporal information and reproductive capacities, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = RST becomes more efficient, and makes the whole ‘networks system’ stronger.

And so by a mixture of restrictions of spatial topology, time cycles and world-plane ‘mathematical structures’ and a will of surviving and enacting the game reinforced by various methods in the zero-points, the astounding wealth and variety of forms of the sentient, eternally moving Universe and its ‘existential forces’ keep evolving:

** In the graph, **the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Tƒ=Min. U. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion, ∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronized into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.

How all those scales co-exist together? The answer is an interesting but difficult concept to grasp:

In the smaller world there are more time cycles than in the larger world. How does we adjust this ‘time longitude’, larger in smaller worlds respect to bigger simpler worlds

‘Strictu senso’, if we consider all the planes to have departed from a single past-point, T, the upper scales will have a ‘time delay’ similar to the delay of any web respect to its harmonic initial focus, only though we are measuring time delay.

Thus the smaller world will be in a ‘relative future’ to the upper worlds. On the other hand, the upper world must be done into the future, with the smaller worlds already sustaining them as past forms. Here there is a fascinating first contact with one of the most complex elements of ∆ST theory – the relativity of past present and future states, that co-exist in quite mixed orders.

In brief, the smaller worlds have more ‘time content’ than the larger worlds, which are both, slower and increasingly lagging in a relative past to the smaller worlds actions which code them, *but both are from their relative frame of reference futures, as the larger worlds see the smaller as their sustain, and the smaller code the larger as their past. Consciousness of what is time past or time future is thus relative to the point of the scale of planes we occupy:*

In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…