**Foreword. ****The first line.**

All what exists is part of fractal time space organism performing a world cycle of existence through its ternary symmetries as a travel in 3 scales of the fifth dimension, which can be described quantitatively in terms of social scales, topologically in terms of geometric transformations, vitally in terms of organic symbiosis and temporally in terms of a conservative zero sum world cycles.

That’s all what it is to the Universe. The rest are details. Humans of course, will always want more – add ons that please their ego paradox, and infantile ways, but trust me that is all what there is to reality. And it can be known in its essence, because as we are made to the likeness and image of the fractal, even the smallest part is a world in itself where all the laws manifest, in each island Universe. And so even if total information can only be extracted from the being in ‘itself’ through time within us we have the whole reality to know.

The Universe is a sum of a series of actions, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.

This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical space-time actions the total reality of any self. But the Devil is in the details. So as this simple ‘aeiou’ game repeats itself creates ever more complex perceptions, mappings of reality into space-forms and motions and forms ensemble into larger beings and smaller ones… forming a fractal structure. So in a second layer of complexity we would say:

The Universe is a fractal super organism of space-time, made of ∞ super organisms all made to its image and likeness. Each super organism IS MADE of 3 ∆º ternary physiological networks, made of smaller ∑∆-1 ‘atoms/cells/individuals’ that process motion, information and reproduce for the whole system, living in a larger ∆+1 world.

Thus super organisms have two fundamental elements: 3 co-3existing ±1 planes of cells/atoms/individuals gathering into physiological networks (together forming a species), living in a larger ∆+1 world:** ∆§**

But those super organisms constantly change its parameters of motion and form, increasing its information warping in a world cycle of time, the ‘3rd fundamental element’, which is therefore symmetric to those physiological networks, as the informative network dominates the other ones, increasingly ‘warping’ the being, either a physical system (so stars become black holes, galaxies quasars, matter solids) or a biological system (3rd age), which then returns back in an explosion that erases its energy (physical E<≈>M Big Bang, or biological death or war, in the 3 type of systems).

So we talk of a 3rd fundamental element, the worldtime cycle of the being, symmetric to its spatial super organism: S≈ð; WHICH add two new elements, the symmetry and the temporal world cycle.

But why a system increases its information till death? Because it does have a singularity or ego, mind, or linguistic mapping center, which ‘perceives’ the whole system as a whole and as a perception center stops the motion of the Universe into ‘linguistic mappings’, slowly ordering reality till there is no motion and time continues reversing the no-motion old form into an entropic explosion of death. Thus there is a fifth element, @-minds, the most difficult to accept scientifically because it is the ‘non-perceivable’ inner engine of reality. In wor(l)ds of Schopenhauer, the point that has the ‘will’ to exist and ‘represents’ reality within its self. This if the fifth element for the ‘minimal description of reality’: **S@<≈>∆ð.**

We have studied those 5 elements in this first line and we will use it in the second line to define the main sciences and languages of reality. Let us remember them again, with a bit more of quantitative detail ‘restarting again our sentence’:

The Universe is a fractal super organism made…

**S…**In*space of a simultaneous***ternary topology,****(|+O≈ ø)**… made of**3 physiological networks**(|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy)…**∆:**In scales of an Ensemble of ∞ relative*fractal scales*of**∆º**super organisms each one sum of smaller**∑∆-1**super organisms… that*trace*in a larger**∆+1 world…****ð:***In sequential time of cycles of existence,*each one dominated by one of those 3 networks (motion-youth, or relative past; iterative present dominant in vital energy, and informative 3rd age or relative future);**of 3 ages**,**@: In mind of reflections of its infinite cycles**Put together into**language mirrors,**by an åctive mind that perceives those networks of ∆-1 cellular parts as a whole being, enacting simple**aei**, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (**e-**ntropy feeding), motion (**a-**celerations) and**i**nformation (perceptions) with other beings, in order to maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being, achieved through two complex actions:**o**ffspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into**U-**niversals.

So to have a full description of maximal truth of the being, we require to study, the **S-**patial, **S-**calar, **ð-e**mporal and **@**tive elements of a system, through its ternary **≈**symmetries, achieved through the formalism of the Generator equation and its ternary Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, ¬Æ logic of 3±∆ Dimensional arrows of time space and Fractal Non-Euclidean points which enlarge in size and fit ∞ parallels when we travel through the 4th and 5th dimension of scalar parts and larger wholes, in which the being performs its **world cycle, **born of an ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves socially an emerges as an ∆º organism, living 3 ages in the outer world, to die back into an entropic explosion of 4Death completing a zero-sum of virtual existience, studied according to its relative size by different sciences, all of them following the same Disomorphic laws of space-time born of those 5D.

The degree of complexity and quantity of truth achieved in the description of a being thus requires to consider the different perspectives of its fundamental S@≈∆ð elements and we shall do so in this blog in 2 x 2 lines of increasing complexity.

The first 2 lines describe it more simple, with the analysis of the Rashomon effect in the first line – the 5 points of view on reality, grouped together into simultaneous space organisms tracing sequential world cycles of existience; applied in the second line to the main fields of science, astrophysics, biology, history, economics and the 3 main languages of human thought, spatial maths, verbal and artistic, time-space senses and then the upgrading of T.œ, the isomorphic laws of time space organisms of any scale.

The 3rd line will double the complexity of the analysis by considering in more detail the quantitative ’10-decametric scale’ of growth of a system between its seed state as an informative still @-mind, through its growth in holographic space-time elements, its actions, networks, world cycles, variations of spaces and scalar social growth; across the 9 main planes of sciences perceived by human beings, which are described in the fourth line.

This the content of this first line is simpler. First we Do define the whole organic Universe in ‘Home’, the main page.

Then we study the existence of all ∆ºst beings of the Universe considering those 5 elements TOGETHER: Its symmetric 5 Dimensions of space and time and its active minds that search for energy, information and reproduction, to create…

Simultaneous super organisms made of fractal points, join by the 3 functional physiological networks of entropic, energetic and informative processing; which live to reproduce survive and make immortal the system in time tracing worldcycles through 3 of such scales, ∆±1 centralized in its individual ∆º form, each one defined by each science.

And so we write all this as a first sentence that describes the amazingly simple, infinitely iterating T.Œ=∑T.œs, Superorganim of the Universe:

- Home: ” 5D² ” ðime$paœ “@Mirrors “exi±sto @ct “reproducing “§upœrganisms “ðriping “ωorldcycles øf “∃xi≈st¡ences:

So each of the words of that sentence resume a key element of the whole Universe (Home: ” 5D² ” ðime$paœ) and any of its fractal parts, a T.œ made to its image and likeness: *dynamically* in * time* (ðriping “ωorldcycles ‘timespace dimensions’ & ‘worldcycles’),

*simultaneously*in

*(“reproducing “§upœrganisms ), as an active mind that performs the program of the 5 actions of survival (“@Mirrors “exi±sto @ct ) self-centered into a scientific scale (“∃xi≈st¡ences:).*

**s**paceIn this manner the Rashomon effect offer us the maximal possible truth on the being outside itself (where all the truth or ‘1’ probability happens) by offering multiple perspectives of its elements maximized with different languages for each of those elements.

Then in each elementary analysis, we shall consider in more detail the element of the space-time being under the experimental method, by studying it in physical, biological and social systems.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs (the last element, regardless of the modern digital method of sciences, who wants just pictures, data, facts, put in a single mathematical language, which zero ‘whys’ except the fact that the event ‘is’)…

My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence, *which is precisely regardless of the shallow ideology of modern data-computer modeling conception of knowledge, to find those whys, and prove the Universe is NOT just a chaotic accumulation of data, but has a purpose, a structure and a vital goal: to create super organisms that trace world cycles, and have a will and a perception, enacted: to survive, grow, reproduce that is TO MAXIMIZE its ‘exi=st¡ence’.*

*In this post and sub-posts we shall start the adventure study the fundamental law of those space-time systems, the balance between its formal, spatial elements and its temporal motions, which divides the 10 S + T dimensions of reality in 5 self-similar symmetric dimensions of space and time.*

So we can establish then the existence of 5 Dimensions of space-time, 3 usual dimensions in a single Plane, which in one-dimension correspond to informative height, (so particles do vibrate in the height dimension, the dimension of growth of black holes, and where all head-particles-antennas place themselves to have a view), reproductive width (so reproductive ‘female states’ are wide, so are weaves) and entropic length, of minimal form and maximal speed-distance. This 3 topological dimensions in a single space-time continuum (3+3=6 if we differentiate them as space dimensions, conventionally named 1,2,3, and time dimensions, 4,5,6, though we prefer to group them together as space-time symmetric bidimensional systems); however require to add a fourth dimension of entropic death and a fifth dimension of social evolution, which are pure motions on the scalar Universe.

**I. FRACTAL, CYCLIC ðIME§PACE ORGANISMS**

**CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE**

**The Historic Precedents: Relational space-time.**

The Universe is a fractal of two combined motions with form, |-Space and O-Time, which transform into each other ad eternal.

This simple sentence, which encodes the meaning of all realities is how any text on science should start.

Or shall we say ‘stiences’, as all what stiences study are systems made of vital spaces, closed by time cycles?

Science though ignores this first principle that rules and explains the principles of all ‘stiences’.

Those whys were ruined from the beginning when science adopted a single clock of time.

And dedicated all the effort not to find the whys of the motions and cycles it saw, but to measure them, to find their hows.

The choice of a model of ‘space and time’ to use in scientific measures changed the paradigm from a Universe made of infinite time cycles, into one with a single human clock, with the beat of our heart-eye-thought of a second, to which all other time cycles, were equalized. This allowed the finding of an enormous number of regularities or laws of science, as we could make good measures.

But as time went by the deeper meaning of time cycles, of clocks of time that store the information of the Universe in the frequency and speed of those cycles was lost.

And since ‘time cycles’ and the space-time åctions they perform, encode the whys and meanings of the Universe, those meanings were lost. Leibniz, Darwin, Hegel, Quantum and Relativity pioneers toyed with the idea of formalizing such a model of cyclical time, but as Einstein put it, Leibniz is right but to adapt science to his mode of relational space-time, we must rebuild science from its beginnings.

This need, is very real, as the models of absolute space-time are exhausted and introduce clear errors on physical theories, and fog the whys of the Universe.

But as it happened with previous r=evolutions of thought regarding the ultimate principles of space-time (Copernican revolution, Darwinian revolution, etc.) it will take a long time to happen, as the praxis of measure which sustains our industrial civilization does not need those whys.

It will though happen if humans want to keep evolving their mind and understanding of the whys of the Universe. And this site will be the origin of it, despite its obscurity. Since it is the first ‘point of future information’ that has landed in this present point of knowledge.

In that regard, science has been corrupted in its ultimate ‘quest’ for the whys of the Universe by its own success in a rather more pedestrian task, to find the laws of measure and equations of motion in space and time, the hows of reality. This shallow description of motions in an external world today is often confused with absolute knowledge. It is not. Because while we know we move in space and time, we have yet to solve what time and space is in its deepest sense.

Science will not be completed till we know the whys of those motions of space and time; and specially the whys of existence in space and time.

Since motion is not all what we need to know about beings. Physical analysis of reality often confuses the description of motions with the purpose of knowledge, and stops when that description is complete. But why motion exist, and why beings exist, are created, evolve and become destroyed in life-death ‘worldcycles’? There is there a ‘function of existence’? A mathematical expression of the processes of creation and destruction in the Universe which can be applied to all beings?

That is the fundamental question about reality and the ultimate quest of a full science of knowledge – to discover and analyze the function of existence and extinction of space-time beings.

If in the first post of this web on relational, scalar space-time we study those space-time beings from an external objective perspective, in this post we shall concentrate in their function of existence, the space-time metric equations which describe their existence, their birth and extinction, their creation, their åctions in time and space…

Since this word, ‘existence’, closely related to the life-death worldcycle of all systems of the Universe that are born live and become extinguished with similar patterns, is the key to those whys, which the abstractions of science often forget.

The whys of ‘existence’ are related to the fundamental meaning of concepts such as space, time, line, cycle, motion, form, evolution, extinction, life, death, and so on. Science today has bypassed his problem, merely ignoring those questions. They why – said infamously Feynman – is the only question physicists should not make.

Philosophers then work aside physicists in those whys, unconnected to the hows of physics and hard science. And both remain incomplete. There is however another avenue which merges both quantitative and qualitative, mathematical and logic, philosophical analysis.

This alternative model, started by the fathers of the western tradition, Plato and Aristotle, forgotten with the arrival of mechanisms, clocks that measure time and telescopes and microscopes that see space, better than humans do with temporal words and eyes, was resurrected by Leibniz, with his relational model of space-time.

He affirmed that reality is made of vital spaces that perform time cycles and are all connected into a complex whole. Leibniz though was primarily a mathematician (who discovered calculus, the binary system of numbers and developed the first computers). So he truly was looking for a ‘whole’ explanations that included whys and hows. His model was called ‘relational space-time’ and this web completes it.

The Universe is a fractal made of systems of relational space-time. We all, and all our parts are made of those 2 universal, inverse substances: a vital space, possessing motion and energy; and a series of clocks of cyclical time, which store information in the form and frequency of its cycles.

When we say ‘I don’t have enough energy and time to do this’, we are explaining the essence of existence: to be made of topologic, vital spaces, living organs with the capacity to have motion and convert energy into work, which perform repetitive ≈ cyclical åctions in time guided by a temporal system, our brain that carries its survival information in the frequency and form of its neuronal cycles.

And the same concept can be applied to all physical systems, which are defined by the complementary principle of quantum physics, as particle of temporal information that move as waves of energy over a physical field of space.

Or to complex mechanical systems, made of a platform machine, its relative space, directed by time cycles encoded in computer algorithms.

So we can consider indeed that all systems of the Universe are composed of a vital wave/body/platform that moves and occupies space, guided by temporal cycle of information (particles/heads/digital computers).

And define the Universe as a fractal system made of infinite of such systems, which relate to each other through exchanges of energy and information performed by those body/waves of energy and particles/heads of temporal information.

This description of human beings and any other species of the Universe, as systems made of vital spaces with motion that perform time cycles of finite duration is called a model of relational space-time.

Relational Space-times is the philosophy of science and mathematical model of the Universe Leibniz proposed as an alternative to Newton’s simplistic model of absolute space-time.

Because it was a more complex model than Newton’s single space-time, Leibniz could not formalize it.

So practical science used Newtonian absolute space-time, which simplified measures, for centuries. And science lost in its understanding of the whys of the Universe understanding what it won in precision of measure. Meanwhile Leibniz offered some fascinating insights on the whys of the Universe and the future of science in his ‘Letters to Clarke’ and ‘Monadology’.

Next after Leibniz quantum and Relativity’s revolution validated Leibniz. Quantum had proved that space had motions and was broken in quanta, with entropic, |-Motion, which could give birth to cyclical particles. So there was not an absolute space.

Then Einstein found time cycles moved at different species. So he said that ‘Leibniz was right’ but if we have to adapt his model ‘we have to restart science from the scratch’. Indeed, we must truly restart our philosophy of science from the beginning, specially our anthropomorphic understanding of reality. We are regaining those whys, sourly needed now that precision in science is overwhelming and understanding is lagging far behind.

**U=∞ ∆º±i: **

**Leibniz vs. Newton. The key to unveil the whys of the Universe: relational space-times.**

The theoretical duality of absolute external space-time of measure vs. internal vital spaces and time cycles had two clear authors at the beginning of modern science:

On one side, Newton proposed with Descartes absolute space-time and the Cartesian graph with a lineal time duration and infinite continuous space, or background space-time frame of reference to measure reality. This was useful and it was accepted to do praxis in science.

On the other side, Leibniz who cared more for the whys, found Absolute space-time faulty and proposed a theory of relational time and space, in which time cycles were of different duration, and only humans by putting them sequentially created an absolute time. While space was fractal and absolute space the sum of all those vital spaces.

Beings thus did not occupy a space but were space, and did not live in a background time but lived a finite number of time cycles.

So Leibniz co-founder of calculus, disagreed with Newton (who soon used his power to destroyed his reputation). Undaunted Leibniz affirmed that there were infinite time cycles measured by infinite clocks and beings were made of time cycles and vital spaces, which could be enlarged to observe infinite other, internal vital spaces. So each ‘point was a world in itself’, and abstract, absolute space and time, merely the ‘pegging’ or ‘sum’ of all those time cycles and vital spaces.

This model, which was far more true to the structure of reality however had a great difficulty for measures, as without a ‘frame of reference’ and a ‘clock’ to equalize all other cycles, it was difficult to order them.

Soon the industrial r=evolution, which required exact measures of space distances to construct fitting machines and of time cycles to run properly all the clocks of train stations did away with any epistemological analysis of time and space. Each city then had its own time cycle and time clocks, but railroads needed to unify them and so a single time clock was imposed globally. Machines had to be all equal, so a single space imposed its measures.

And humans completely forgot the obvious: each species had its own time clocks, occupied its own vital space, and all of them were different in length, speed, information, energy, concepts which were never properly defined, since without a clear understanding of the two elements that created all systems, all organisms, all worlds, all realities, lineal, spatial speeds, Sp and cyclical temporal clocks, Tƒ, it was impossible to explain properly the combined magnitudes and meaning of all other elements of physical and biological sciences.

And this is still the stage of Science: an astounding perfection in the description and measure of the events and forms of time and space, without any encompassing, explanative model of the whole, which was buried in the work of Leibniz, demonized in the Anglo-Saxon world by the revengeful Newton who hated the man, who was above him in the comprehension of the Universe.

When the Master of Leibniz, George of the House of Brunswick, became king of England, Leibniz was left behind, as Newton lobbied against him. Had Leibniz arrived to London, perhaps the future of science would have been a different one. But he died alone, poor and ignored and relational space-time, the true theory of the Universe was ignored for centuries. And this simple definition of reality:

‘The Universe is a fractal of complementary systems of space-time.’

…Never made it into the halls of science.

**The organic Universe**

What is the meaning of the Universe? Why we exist? Why we live and die? Those are still unanswered questions which a philosopher of science must try to respond beyond the shallow how-measure of simpler reduced philosophies of reality as those of physical sciences, which do accomplish its role of measuring and describing the facts of science but have given up any attempt to construct comprehensive models of all forms of reality and explain the deeper whys – the purpose of all of it.

Yet those whys surprisingly enough are much simpler than we thought, when we put the proper focus in the proper parameters that create reality, which are NOT languages-mirrors of it (creationist theories of verbal religions and mathematical sciences) but its ultimates substances, space and time. So once we improve our understanding of those two parameters, the 3 ‘arrows of time=change=motion of the Universe’ and the fractal, scalar structure of space which organises reality in co-existing scales of size, illustrated in the next graphs, we will – given the fact that today humans use only a dimension of time and a scale of continuum space to describe reality, have *many more parameters to combine, and use to explain the complex phenomena of our existence as human beings and the existence of any other physical, biological or social **space-time system of the Universe:*

The ‘fractal self-repetitive’ structure of reality is BASED on 5s<≈>5t symmetric dimensions and how its ‘step motions’ build and destroy superorganisms of timespace.

Since both time=motion and space=form are ultimately mirror images of each other:

**The paradox of Galileo.**

‘The earth moves and doesn’t move’. Galileo: relativity and duality of space and time dimensions.

‘A dimension can be perceived as a distance or a motion but not both together’ l§

Einstein studied space as the simultaneous measure of different regions of the temporal Universe. His explanations though were a bit complex, dragging onto the tradition of lineal time and continuous space. It is all simpler. Space is a ‘mental’ perception in simultaneity of different regions of moving time cycles, which the mind simplifies, by extracting information in many ways (motion, scales, third dimension, etc.)

Physics has really been concerned since Galileo realized the earth moved but we do not perceive motion, with the paradox of RELATIVITY of motion vs. stillness. But the duality was not understood, neither the contribution of the mind to the ‘maya of sensorial stillness’ that gives us the ‘perception of space’.

B*ecause all things move, and stillness is a maya of the senses, Galileo was right when he realized the Earth moved. But the important question science has missed ever since, and Einstein would latter explain in relativity is why we see the Earth still if it is moving. Again, we shall fully solve the conundrum when we define the equation of the mind. But* as this is the icing on the cake *of the cyclical universe, we shall bring it now here.*

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

The next graph illustrates the 3 main dualities or paradoxes of endophysics (Physics in which the observer’s mind is also accounted for): motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single §pace vs. fractal scales of spar, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

*In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.*

Moreover, what appears as a single ðime§pace continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

THUS *Galilean relativity though was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of **smaller self-similar systems. Those are pending questions solved with a simple statement, which shall double our dimensions of reality:*

*“Since we cannot distinguish motion in time and form in space, all systems are space-time systems with at least 2 dimensions, as to each motion in time corresponds a form in space: S=T”*

So how physicists called the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages/motions of time? They have a conceptual mess made around them. Of course they study them but do not name it clearly as 3 different time dimensions.

*Physicists on the entropic arrow. Partial theories of it all.*

So on one side they use the entropic dimensions as the single arrow of time of the Universe, studied in entropic systems, gases and dark entropy expanding between galaxies (but here they call it mistakingly dark energy). Then most extend this entropic arrow as the only one, disregarding crystal, informative and liquid, iterative waves of matter, which make the 3 arrows of time. And in cosmology disregarding the vortex of mass-information, in galaxies that compress the Universe balanced the big-bang. So they by lack of clear concepts about time arrows, sponsor a big-bang only theory of an expansive dying Universe, eliminating on their equations the inconvenient truth of implosive time-like accelerated clocks of masses and galactic vortices.

*Physicists on the present arrow: relativity and energy conservation.*

Then they also study the present, simultaneous, iterative space-time, with different tools, but conceptually messed. On one side they realise the combination of relative entropic motions and future mass particles, is conserved in the Universe, either as momentum, or as its integral in a closed repetitive cycle of conservative energy. But they do NOT CALL ENERGY the present arrow of time, they just say it is ‘conserved’, and do not know what it is.

Also they study this kind of conserved time with a formula, v=s/t, t=∂s/∂v. Whereas they measure infinitesimal moments in the process of motion, taking ‘present pictures’ of simultaneous space to refine its measure of speed (Einstein and Galilean relativity) So this measure of present stills of space-time with derivatives, is another analysis of present space, performed by Galileo and Einstein (special relativity). And as it requires NOT a change of state in its form, it is truly always indicated for studying a single ‘present’ state. So relativity science deals mainly with the single non chaining ðime§pace continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of small quanta of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of ðime.

*Physicists on the future arrow: vortices of accelerated time in different scales: masses and charges.*

Finally Einstein realized that time curves space into accelerated masses (general relativity, principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration). So he defined a future, accelerated vortex of time-information, a mass, which we extend to charges in the smallish quantum scale, and to thermodynamic eddies inout scale (graph) which are therefore the arrow of future information nature. Yet they do NOT either recognise charges and masses as fractal clocks of accelerated future time, as we do. So they cannot unify them (the saint grail of physics is an equation that unifies charges and masses and we shall easily provide merely by adapting the obscure jargon of electromagnetism to the simpler vortex-like jargon of gravitation: Newton>Poisson>Einstein).

So while physicists have in front of them the 3 dimensions of time, parallel to the 3 forms of space, they have a conceptual mess, due to the use of a single time clock and a single arrow of time, entropy, which makes them NOT to recognise the arrow of accelerated time in masses and charges, and the relationship between steady time-cycles and energy conservative cycles.

They also deny the capacity of those time vortices, particles, to process and gauge information, even if they act as ‘mathematical minds’, controlling the organic territory, they perceive. And so they miss the logic explanation of the paradox of Glalileo: particles as heads do, perceive information and gauge it in relative stillness. So as in a film, the process is an stop-particle-gauge information go-wave duality, which explains the paradoxes of relativity (c-constancy of speed, emitted in entangled stillness) and quantum physics (perception always of the particle stopped by the perceiver, as systems move in waves and gauge information as stopped particles).

IN THAT REGARD, PHYSICISTS miss the fundamental conceptual truth behind Galilean relativity: the Galilean paradox and its cause – the fact that minds map reality with languages, that are smallish, fixed forms and so when we perceive we reduce the 3+3 dimensions of space and time to 3 dimensions of space, to have a still image, as your eyes give it to you – with hardly any motion, to fit it all in the brain.

Thus because that description is the simplified reduced subjective vision of the human mind, which ‘stops motion’ to fit reality in its smallish brain we must conclude that the ‘real objective Universe’ is made NOT of spatial forms (a mind mirage) but of motions, not of a single continuum but many scales and clocks of time that enclose and break space into internal regions and outer worlds. So reality is about:

-Dimensional ðime Motions not distances; Scalar Spaces, broken and discontinuous (ab.§) not single §pace continuum; and cyclical in form ‘ðime§paces’, not lineal (as we have proved previously).

**RECAP. THE S≈T DIMENSIONS OF THE UNIVERSE.**

Science started when Galileo realized that the earth moves objectively, externally but the mind sees still. So we cannot distinguish motion from form (Poincare) and as such, every dimension of form=space can also be seen as a dimension of time=motion. This means we shall see time-motions and space-forms together, giving origin to the first simpler topological dimensions:

In the graph the 3 dimensions of space and time. As we can see they correspond to the only 3 topologies of reality, and as such they combine in form and function to create in a single plane of space-time, all the systems we observe: reality we see around is ternary made of 3 functional/formal space-time organs/networks that form super organisms:

*In graph, different orders of the 5Dimensions of reality give birth to different entities, super organisms in a single present scale of time-space, ensembles of 3 basic forms, 1D particle-heads/3D wave-bodies and 2D lineal limbs/fields; but only when we add the lower dimension of ∑∆-1>∆º emerging seeds of information and its entropic dissolutions ∆º<∆-1, the full meaning of the game of exi=st¡ences, existences as space-time organisms studied by different stiences reach its full meaning.*

Further on the 3 first dimensions are equivalent to the conservation processes of angular momentum – the first parameter perceived in the point, its motion, second parameter and reproductive strength, third parameter such as if we give an Active magnitude value as the scalar 1D and a vectorial momentum 2D number for the second dimension, we get equations of reproduction for the third dimension.

∑ LINEAL MOMENTUM ≈ LIMBS/POTENTIALS + ∑ANGULAR MOMENTUM: PARTICLES/HEADS = VITAL ENERGY

**MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; 5D METRIC.**

**Dimensions are motions perceived as stillness.**

The *Paradox of Galileo*, the key logic concept to understand the meaning of dimensions, astoundingly ignored by science for 400 years: ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’, which can be enlarged to this question: ‘why we see everything still, if all what we study in a quantum scale has motion?’ IS the key to unveil the dimensions of the Universe.

The answer given by quantum physics that we shall expand further to all scales is *the law of complementarity*: ‘all what exists is still and has motion *at the same time*; all is a ‘particle’ and a ‘wave’’, *but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either, but not both, dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state.*

Thus, we apply this duality to the definition dimensions: dimensions are both, an extension of fixed space, perceived as motion or a motion ‘perceived as fixed space’. For example, the ultimate space of the Universe, vacuum, is teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); Galaxies separate from each other at huge speeds but we see their ‘motion’ as an expansion of space…Thus:

*‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance’.*

Hence dimensions can be generated by motions of particles and reproductions of waves. In the lower scale of string theory we can describe those dimensions as the reproduction of strings. But what matters to us is the vacuum of our scale of space-time; *which can be seen as electromagnetic motion at c-speed, since it is filled of light and background radiation, or as vacuum space.*

This duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we perceive a car moving also as a fixed line of distance in a night picture, or the duality of stop and go of a film camera, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It explains the generation of dimensions:

A point with motion creates a line dimension; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion creates a mass-volume and a volume in motion creates a life-cycle or world-cone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4^{th} dimension of time.

The reader might notice that those motions become perceived by human senses as a duality of motion-stillness, so the 1^{st} dimension is seen as speed, the second, a plane or sheet of information as the page you are reading as ‘still form’ or information the 3^{rd}, a volume or mass becomes again a stillness, and the 4^{th} a world line, which *is substituted by a time cycle, as motion again. Thus again the past, the 4 ^{th} dimension becomes ‘still’ and the future, the 5^{th} dimension, an uncertain motion.*

Indeed, theoretically, prior to Absolute Relativity there were in physics only 3 dimensions of space and one of time.

But under the duality of the Paradox of Galileo, in reality those 3 dimensions of space are also motions. And indeed, it is obvious at quantum scale that ‘space’ is really a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies.

This also applies to our scale. So if we consider the motion of a gas, volume is proportional to that motion/temperature: PxV=knT. But volume is space; so space grows as motion grows. And it applies to the aforementioned cosmic scale of galaxies moving/creating distances.

Moreover we observe that each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the world-cone the plane.

Can we extend this growing game of dimensions in motion that create a new dimension? Yes, we can, when we do a proper analysis of what the 4^{th} dimension of time in General Relativity really means – something which as most definitions of physics is far better understood in mathematical terms than in logic, conceptual ones. Indeed, physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond the 3^{rd} dimension our ‘senses’ spatialize, by creating the stillness of light-space, all other dimensions are perceived as motions in time. Hence there are not ‘weird’ impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3^{rd} one of ‘volume’, for reasons that go beyond this introductory lesson on Absolute Relativity.

*Physicists spatialize time, in terms of its ‘present’ dimension.*

Few physicists understand that time has also 3 dimensions, since they only study ‘simultaneous measures’, mathematically described with derivatives, ∂t, which are an ‘instant of time’; that is, a slice of present in the total flow of the 5^{th}-6^{th} dimensions.

This was further proved by Einstein’s Relativity a theory, which is concerned with the values of ‘simultaneous measures of space-time’, hence with the values of a relative ‘present time’.

This concept of present time derives from Galileo’s measure of speed, V=s/t, ∂s/∂t; hence ∂t=∂s/v. which is the meaning of time in standard physics.

Time is defined then in terms of space and speed (which are according to the paradox of Galileo, similar concepts of fixed space or motion space). Hence physics ‘spatializes time’; and vice versa. In those terms, *space is just the perception of present time in simultaneity. Or in words of Einstein:*

*‘Space is measure from a simultaneous frame of reference’.*

Thus physical time, ∂t, only shows a very limited ‘dharma’, or part of the entire flow of time from past (the fifth dimension) to future (the sixth dimension). In physics the fourth dimension is only present time, which is what the Riemannian geometries of Einstein’s and Minkowski’s models of space-time study.

Time though as any child knows before it learns General Relativity, has not only the present time, the spatial ‘dharma’, or slice of the flow of time that ‘freezes’ in the field equations of Einstein. Space is a fixed perception of a time motion.

Thus, all systems *must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. *Then both will be an equivalent perspective on the same event.

Now with those concepts clear, the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions can be defined both in space and time, as all other dimensions can be.

*The 4 ^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions in space.*

Then there is the 4th and the 5th dimension of time, past and future. And while this might seem trivial, it is the beginning of a true r=evolution on our understanding of it.

In space the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions refer to the fractal scales from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, where the human scale will be considered the border between both, for reasons that will become clear when we define them in time.

And the main properties of those scales, *each of them a discontinuous space-time in itself, are the self-similarities and invariances of form that happen between them and give origin to its absolute relativity.*

Since we shall find the same topological forms when we ‘evolve’ from one scale to another.

Yet since form is function, we will find also the same functions in each scale. For example, in all scales we will find clock-like cyclical forms that pack information, from informative particles to human heads to robotic ones.

Finally the relationships between any given ‘I’ scale and its i-1 and i+1 smaller and bigger scales are always the same. So the relationship between cells, animals and ecosystems (the 3 scales of biological beings) can be formalized with the same laws that the relationships between 3 other scales, such as particles, atoms and molecules (3 scales of physical beings) and so on.

*The 4 ^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions in time.*

From a time perspective, reality has not only 3 dimensions of space, but also 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future. And the relationship between those scales perceived in space and in time is simple, but deeply meaningful to understand the complex Universe

– The scales of the 4^{th} dimension, simpler than the human scale are ‘the relative past’ if we consider an arrow of complexity and social evolution. So particles were born before atoms born before molecules born before cells born before men born before societies. As each new scale is made of quantic networks of ‘smaller beings’ of the previous scale. So without cells man cannot exist and without molecules cells cannot and so on.

– On the other hand the scales of the 5^{th} dimension, more complex than the human individual are scales of a relative future.

– And in between there is our scale or relative present, which exists as the dominant scale of reality, ‘now’.

It is then needed to separate past from future, just because we humans are in the present? Yes. Since in complex time theory, we shall find that the f*uture is constantly calculated and chosen among many futures , while the past is already a single one. Thus the future is potentially including all possible pasts, as the past contains all the presents that were.*

Yet for you to grasp fully that structure we need to do some clarification on the nature of time in physics and expand those notions to define ‘cyclical time’ and the concepts of relative past, present and future in terms of the density of information of a system, which is proportional to its duration in time.

**5D adds t****he dimensions of 4D entropy and 5D: mind-wholeness or information to a single plane creating the scalar Universe. **

In the graphs, the ternary scales that configure all physical systems, biological and sociological, both human and mechanical eco(nomic)systems, with ∆-1 humans/machines, ∆º, mothers, company-mothers, and ∆+1 civilisations and industrial nations.

* **B*ecause the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain *connected organic structure are co-invariant, *it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):

*‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of space-time).’*

*That simple equation is* the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.

But further on, we realized with the use of telescopes and microscopes that all systems are in detail made of smaller parts even if we cannot distinguish networks from wholes. So we need to consider two more dimensions, the fourth dimension of entropy, beyond the lineal motions of time, and the fifth dimension of social evolution into wholes, to complete the ‘experience’ of existence.

IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 5D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its entropic death:

*§pace is the synchronous perception of ðime Cycles, at a slow ratio of perception of its moving information by a fixed point-mind, the first dimension of existence. *As even before a lineal motion (2D) exists, the being must ‘be’, emerge from the lower plane of self-organization, ∆-1 in which it was seeded. Then the being will move after gauging information and start the stop and go motion that makes it perceivable to the external world.

**The 4 ^{th} & 5^{th} dimensions in all sciences: causal logic and forecasting.**

Science deals mostly with the total flow of time. Since, scientific laws consist in finding patterns in the events caused by a certain being, which will repeat those events called ‘actions’, once and again – fact, this which allows all sciences to predict the future, as we know where the sun will be next year – same repetitive cycle; and so on.

Thus while time in physics is mainly (but not only) related to the study of present space, in most sciences time is related to the understanding of the causal flows and cyclical patterns from the past used to forecast the future, according to those previous cycles of the past.

We conclude that the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions are mainly the realm of causality and duality, of logic and evolutionary science, of bio-logical sciences, which have had much more success than physicists in exploring long ‘time’ ranges with evolutionary and organic, morphological theories about how information, form, changes with time.

Both works on time, Relativity and Evolution must be fusioned and that is the path of the future of science. And the theory that fusions them is not physics neither biology but the sciences that study both together, general systems sciences, whose formalism I developed in the past 2 decades as an Independent Researcher and explained in a series of lectures on the international congresses of Systems sciences (1).

General Systems Sciences could be a good name for it, complexity other, Absolute Relativity a third one. But let us call it only the study of the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions of time in depth, as physicists study only present derivatives of time and evolutionists have not understood fully the morphological laws of evolution, its limits and repetitive patterns.

All this said is evident that science has always been concerned with the understanding of the 4^{th} dimension of past, its patterns and cycles to be able to forecast the 5^{th} of future, through the laws of causality that creates the future, departing from the past, through a series of ‘quantum dharmas’, simultaneous measures, perceptive stills of reality called presents

This is indeed the central question of knowledge – to know the causality of the past and how to extend it to understand the future:

Why things exist and become extinct in time, how they are created and assembly themselves in space, shaping ever more complex systems – in brief how the social networks, systems and scales of the Universe emerge into ‘being’ with self-similar laws, forming the discontinuous space-time intervals of the fifth dimension.

The interplay of those dimensions and form generate the Universe:

Now, in those graphs we can see the most classic ‘generation’ of ‘meanings’ in the Universe, by combining the 2 ‘forms’, the line and the cycle, and the two ‘motions’, the lineal motion and the cyclical one (and its SxT combinations of waves and hyperbolic bodies).

If we restrict to that first generation, and consider |-S <≈> O-T, to be the essential duality, we can study its combinations.

A perfect, still, lineal, ‘extended space’ with no motion and no perceivable form: |-S, or space.

A still cyclical form, or with minimal motion, as information. A lineal motion, entropy or with min. form, energy. STe,i

A perfect cyclical form or’Time clock, To.

As the Universe starts to mess rhythms of motions that decelerate and expand into space, becoming still or accelerate inwards and become cyclical motions of time. As the observer changes its perspective enlarging and hence stretching cycles into lines of lesser curvature, and vice versa, the forms of the Universe also change. The graph shows our choice of 4 words to explain them, |-Space, res extensa with no perceivable motion, O-Mind, still cyclical form, |-entropy, expanding motion and O-Time, accelerated cyclical motion, and the somewhat more conceptual, less defined, energy (tending to lineal motion but with form) and information (tending to cyclical form that with motion), where we ‘put in’ as humans do, in a similar conceptualisation to that of spaces and times, the two inverse elements of the Universe.

Thus it must be cleared, that the logic equations of the Universe are fractal, conceptual, dualities, based in inversions and symmetries of two poles that come together vibrating into 3 points, of Max. S≈E, Max. T≈I, S=T, E=I, of maximal, minimal and balanced states, ages, forms.

This is the game, 2 limiting functions, opposite to each other, of relative past and future, combining into relative present, E=I balanced points.

THE UNIVERSE IS NOT A QUANTITATIVE BUT A LOGIC NOT A MATERIAL BUT SPIRITUAL GAME, and the quantitative and material reality and perception of the game as such comes only AFTER.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we shall try to give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed, Sp x Tƒ = K.

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

**10 logarithmic scales.**

To notice that the 5th dimension is based on 10 logarithms because the ‘Tetraktys’ is the most perfect group of 3 x 3 + 0 elements, which become specialised in the ‘Sp-energetic, Tƒ- informative and ST-reproductive, iterative functions of the ‘Program of survival’ of all systems, which will be made clear latter on, when we analysed the world cycles of time and the ternary Generator equation in space and time, of the fractal Universe.

You have to be a bit patient, as we have first to ground all this in some basic mathematics. Thus between 2 such scales of the 5th dimension we shall always find around 10¹¹ elements – the ties of a DNA molecule, the stars of our galaxy, the cells of a super organism, the galaxies of the perceived Universe, and between the Universal Constants of Space, we will find the same differences, the energetic value between the H-planck constant of Tƒ in the ∆-1 quantum scale and the k-Boltzmann constant of the ∆-Thermodynamic, human scale; and then the µ-magnetic scale and so on.

So this said, the 5^{th} dimension is in the holes of the real numbers each of its decametric decimal a lower scale of the 5^{th} dimension. Yet as usual those numbers should be really cut every 10 ‘decimals, because then we enter into another scale where anyway the values of constants such as Pi, and √2 vary as Lobachevski’s proved.

This is made clear just by revising a simple number, e, but a key number for the derivative, proportional emergence or descend between scales, approximately 2.718281828. to the 9^{th} decimal. The reader will observe that actually those 10 numbers form a simple series, 2.7 18 28 18 28 repetitive in extreme (except the first decimal missed by one to make it a perfect 28-18 variation, but after the 10^{th} decimal it breaks, with 2.7 18 28 18 28 45904 etc. That is, the equivalent to the loss of meaning and yet one more of the so many proofs I have found of the existence of the 5^{th} dimension, its geometries, algebras, and mind forms, circular membranes, points of view and ternary organic parts.

Indeed, e ^{x}= [(1+1/n)^{n}] ^{x} is the only derivative which is proportional to the same number, since if we take 1 the whole and n, one of its finitesimal parts, in space, a quanta, and then repeat this growth of diminution an n number of time, and an x number of social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, we shall find the emergence processes or dissolution≈ death processes of most systems of the Universe.

The quantitative scales however always yield in its meaning to the functions, and ternary symmetries we shall discover that make possible the existence of all systems as combinations of 3 ‘scales of the 5th dimension’ (quantum-cellular, thermodynamic-organic, gravitational-social), 3 synchronous topologies and 3 diachronic ages, so we soon will write the Generator Equation of Space-time Beings:

**Γ.** ∆-1: Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ∆:ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥∆+1: Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

This simple structure and all its fractal variations is essentially the description of any World-system, whose sum creates the Universe: U=∑W

Relational space-times thus have the key word ‘relational’, which merely means we need a ‘metric system’ to order and relate all those space-time cycles of the Universe.

And this is the 5^{th} dimension of the Universe: the metric laws that put and order, RELATE to each other all the time-space cycles of the Universe, of which we are all made.

**Final proof of a space-time fractal organic Universe: 3 only topologies.**

we are made of time and space because those 3 topologies above that make up our forms, are the only 3 that exist in the Universe and their forms and functions are symmetric in space and time:

TO NOTICE THAT LINEAL MOTION FOLLOWS the geometric fact that lines are the shortest distance and particle/heads that gauge information that spheres the maximal volume of information in minimal space. So both dimensions of motion and angular momentum are inverse in properties, as lineal and cyclical time: T=1/ƒ, reason why merely by inverting some parameters we can translate 4D into 5D formalisms. While the third variety of topology hyperbolic body-waves combine both forms and can generate them.

In the graph the first dimension is ‘being’, and hence a synopsis of all the other dimensions, as the being emerges from ∑-1 into ∑, with the configuration of a fractal particle-point.

We define thus mathematically the point as the first dimension of existence, the emerging seed that surfaces into ∆º.

Then the being will move in a lineal step, which likely will form as time conserves motion into cycles, a full world cycle. And so the second dimension of the being will be the line of motion, and its best expression put together the momentum of the being, which allow us to write the simplest 3 dimensional St-ELEMENT of reality, a fractal point in still motion (1D), its open motion, likely step of a whole world cycle, (2D) and its combination or ‘momentum 1D x 2 D = 3D, in the simplest physical description of the 3 first dimensions of existence.

The generalisation of those 3 dimensions was in fact the beginning of physics.

We shall first note that the difference between the space state and age states differ. In the graph we order the 1-2-3-4D in terms of aging.

So the space-time dimension in the 3 ages begin and end in a zero cycle as follows:

- From conception, ∆-1 to birth, ∑∆-1>∆º, first dimension as an emergent point (internal 5D=1D+1)
- From birth to reproductive adolescence, the age of lineal motions, or 2D age
- Then the reproductive, 3Dimensional age, where the being ‘fulfills’ i=ts existence.
- And as it reproduces in an ∆§² scale, it integrates itself into the ∆+1 world (external 5D)
- To enter a slow age of decay and detachment between the 3 networks, which accelerates and explodes in the 4D final point of death.

Yet to transform and compare two entities they must have the same dimensions, and so we adscribe in all equations to time the dimension of height-information, needed to convert a time line into a world cycle.

And so time and space are BIDIMENSIONAL and can transform into each other ad eternal into space-time mixtures, yin-formation and yang-entropy thus become ‘space-time’ energy and we can write the simplest of all formulations of the Generator equation:

S≈T (where ≈ means the wave-like present space-time mixture of both). THIS IS THE ULTIMATE equation, yes that simple. And yet *the bidimensionality of time≈information and space≈entropy, which allows the transformation of one into the other and its combination into ∞ ST≈energy beings, (as only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other), is the fundamental law of the Universe, I have ‘printed on my mind’ with the lightening of Zeus, since it is the simple, first thought of creation, which will reveal the contour of it all.*

It also mean that time is bidimensional (rhythm or ‘frequency’ and height, the first being the pure dimension of time, the second of ‘perceptive information’ – and we shall see to the amazement of physicist, that indeed, the particle is always on top or ahead of the wave-body that moves it). Yet now because time is bidimensional, IT FOLLOWS, that it can be transformed into space. S<=>T, which is the ultimate formula of the universe.

Let us then explore this concept, which is essential to reality in all sciences, *as only beings with the same dimensions can transform into each other. *

Indeed, consider for example, the rewriting of Einstein’s equations, which is immediate. He took time to be an imaginary fourth spacetime coordinate ict, where c is the speed of light and i is the imaginary unit. Now we write: *ds² = (dx, dz) (dy – i**cdt).*

And so time-like functions will become the stuff of the ‘imaginary’ number world, ever pervading in all physical studies of space-time events. And while the equations will be the same the interpretation of this mathematical insight are many. I.e. in the field of quantum physics, immediately we realise its main ‘generator equation’, Schrodinger’s equation can be written as Broglie->Bohm did in polar, imaginary coordinates; *and it will define the particle-state of the quantum system, its cyclical, informative nature.*

The first connection between algebra and physics is the use of the same operandi, but what kind of variables are translations of the pure functions of time and space in GST to physical equivalents. Frequency, 1/t, is the immediate one-dimensional translation of time. Moreover, frequency can be synoptically limited to a ‘point-mind’ of information – a simplex language equations; as frequency taken on a single point of each translative space-time cycle, reduces further the total information of the being to a discrete serie of numbers.

__The scales and ST¡ences of reality.__

As the widest one is the concept of a topological network-plane, of the 5^{th} dimension we can consider it in more detail.

All Sciences share the isomorphisms of duality and organicism. Since the forms of energy and information and its properties remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe, described in the next graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of time and events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes. Yet the proportion of energy and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (with minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity).

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, *which *define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Sciences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe absorb energy, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

The universe is a scalar social organisms that grows in scales of 10 elements. This growth of new ‘scales of space-time’ IS THE ARROW OF absolute future of reality. Since those who evolve together from individuals into social organisms survive better and dominate its ecosystem, in all scales of size and form of reality. So in biological terms the 5th dimension of eusocial love to ALL the members of your own species (regardless of structure and work-division, into neuronal informative people, and working reproductive ones, to form the ‘mind and body of the system’) IS THE DIMENSION OF FUTURE.

But logically it is ALSO the dimension of future, since ‘parts’ MUST be created BEFORE wholes. So the past is the lonely particle, neanderthal ‘violent’ (partially) white man, AND THE FUTURE, is NOT the homo bacteria or ‘animetal’, in the jargon of bio-history, which betrays all other human beings of its species with segregational memes and loves mechanisms, weapons and go(l)d more than the wor(l)d of love, the biological mandate, the future of its species. Finally it is also the future mathematically and experimentally, as it is obvious the Universe (or the galaxy in more humble studies of the big-bang) started in a sea of entropy that evolved into social scales, as particles became atoms, molecules, cells, crystals, planets, ecosystems of super organisms, galaxies… ALL GUIDED BY THE SUPREME PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE, love all those who belong to your species, work together, create a larger whole and control your entropic territory with it:

In the graph, we can see the ultimate goal of the Universe, the creation of fractal super organisms in which species and individuals who talk the same language of information evolve a larger whole. While *those who don’t understand the Mind of the Universe, the true meaning of God, and the fractal minds of all its species which explain the same concept in each language, the gods of verbal love of the human super organism perish.*

Finally mathematically the fifth dimension is proved by the so called ‘metric’ of a mathematical dimension, which according to Klein exists, when we can *travel through the dimension with the space-time parameters remaining invariant.*

And this is the case of all motions through scales of the fifth dimension, the most notably being ‘the world cycle of life and death, as we are born in the lower seminal scale, with small space-size (Ab. Se) and fast time cycles (ab. Ti) but as we grow in size (+∆Spe), our clocks of time decelerate (-∆T) AND SO its capacity to carry in’form’ation stored in the cyclical ‘form’ and frequency of those cycles (so a computer which is complex clock measures its info in frequency gigahertzs).

SO THE PRODUCT OF Space size and time speed: S x T and the product of the spatial energy stored in that vital space and the information of its clocks e x i, REMAINS INVARIANT, PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE 5TH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE, EXPERIMENTALLY, mathematically, biologically, and in mystical terms.

**Metric-mathematical and empirical, organic Proofs of the fractal 5D Universe.**

Indeed, what are then the formal proofs of the existence of a 5th dimension of scalar space-time (ab.∆§) ?

In more strict terms, according to epistemology we need *experimental science and a mathematical ‘metric’ equation that describes the dimension. *

Experimental proofs: Everything that you see and exists is a proof of the 5th dimension, *since there is nothing on the Universe, which is not made of smaller ‘parts’ (∆-1 lower scale), and part itself of a larger ‘world’ (∆+1)*

*In the graph, we see how all systems are made of fractal networks of energy and information, which form wholes departing from smaller ‘points’, creating fractal organisms in all sciences. in the left the creation of a hierarchical, fifth dimension of future ‘timespace’ (boson state of matter)*

Mathematical proof: According to Klein, a dimension of space-time exists, when we can travel through its space and time coordinates, whose product remains invariant: “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a spacetime, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”

So what remains invariant in the 5th dimension when we travel through it up and down those scales during our ‘world cycles of life and death’ (as all systems are born in an ∆-1 ‘seminal scale’ of pure information, emerge into an ∆-scale at birth and become part of the larger world, or ‘whole’ ∆+1). Amazingly as it seems despite the enormous transformations systems go through when ‘travelling through its life-death world cycle’ through the scales of the 5th dimension, *the product of its size in space and ‘speed of time-clocks/processing of information’, remains the same:*

5D metric equation:* Se (size in space) x To (cyclical time clocks) ≈ Constant.*

In the graph, we can classify all those sciences and its species according to two parameters of space and time: its lineal size, and the inverse speed of its ‘cyclical clocks of information’. So larger species turn slower its time cycles. Yet for entire families of species the product of both parameters remains co-invariant.

Since mathematicians define a new dimension of space-time as a geometry that remains invariant when we change its space-time parameters, *it is then evident that all systems have an internal ‘scalar dimension’ that structures its smaller, faster parts and its larger wholes. *

Depending on which system we study across how many scales, we shall find different quantitative measures of the previous metric equation, which might vary in the details, but the fundamental characteristic of it, the inverse arrows of growing information and diminishing size, which balance each other, will hold for absolutely all the entities of the Universe. And so this metric equation is of an enormous importance to understand the relationship between those scales that happen in all the organisms and complex systems of reality.

In the graph, we can see the FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, or metric equation of the fifth dimension, which ensures the survival of social wholes and the extinction of those who are selfish individuals that do not evolve or hate other members of its own species.

**Simultaneity in space, synchronicity in time.**

Next we need to understand the extreme limits between the ‘parts’ that travel through the fifth dimension, and those who exist on space. In the graph we see the classic monad, self-centred in a single point of space, which however has an extraordinary range ‘of time’/information; and its domain limit, a cyclical membrane which extends in space *simultaneously. So we can define the two limits of the system:*

*“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of **synchronous **clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of **simultaneous **space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”*

We concluded earlier that pure time, the absolute arrow is that of the fifth dimension, relative time is the world cycle as it ends always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.

How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.

They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single point-quanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronised by it.

The quanta of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. A POINT OF TIME, thus is a mind and it will be structured through causal time in its connection to other beings through synchronicity.

On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its upper or lower (relative concept) scale that ‘entangles it’ through simultaneous networks of communication, sychornizing its motions. Those are laws of quantum physics, ill-understood, which can be extended to all other systems of the Universe. We won’t go further on this introduction, which just gives glimpses to the whole sheer magnificent structure of the ∆±i ST universe.

The POWER of the mind to organise and web together as a singularity of time, the fractal scales in the Universe happens *precisely because while they co-exist in the same point of space, physically and bio-logically, they are displaced in the latitude of time, from past to future, as ‘time co-exist’ in a ‘block’ that makes Einstein’s dictum a physical reality.*

It must be also understood that we practice the 3 epistemological pillars of GST: The experimental, scientific method, the correspondence principle and the GST-proper, isomorphic method, meaning any law of the Universe must *be in correspondence with classic theories and it must be applied to physical, biological an social systems equally.*

So we structure many posts with a simple scheme: 1) Epistemological Proofs 2) physical systems, 3) biological systems 4) sociological systems.

*Thus as humans change ‘mind-languages’, in each discipline, we must change the jargon of each property. So the question is what are the ‘jargons’ used to describe the fifth dimension in each of the three sub-disciplines of ‘stience’? *

*And the answer is obvious: Physical systems use mathematical metric equations to prove the existence of dimensions.*

Biological systems talk of super organisms (ab. supœrganisms, œ), as the structure that best describes a co-existing system embedded in multiple self-similar scales, all of them constructed as a whole through three physiological networks – the entropic/digestive/feeding, energetic/reproductive and informative/nervous network.

And social systems talk of ‘love’, eusocial evolution – the sharing of entropic property, energy and information among the members of the society as the ‘purpose and method’ to build new scales of the fifth dimension.

**The timespace laws of the fifth dimension**

All this said we can formulate the fundamental formal law of the fifth dimension of timespace, which will also allow us to define time and space, and the *limiting species of both categories, the mind and vacuum:*

*“A point of time occupies synchronically infinite scales of the fifth dimension in a single quanta of space, a point of space occupies simultaneously infinite extensions of space, in a single quanta of time.”*

So those will be the themes of the article. Since the beginning of knowledge humans have been obsessed about the nature of space and time for a good reason. We all exist occupying a quantity of vital space, which lasts in its form a finite time duration. So for all sciences and species the properties of that vital space and time life-death cycles are essential. And yet it seems humans have not advanced so much despite the enormous wealth of data accumulated to properly explain the structure of the organic, vital space all systems display across ‘different scales’ of size, and the cyclical nature of its life-death cycles.

This of course has been contested but two ‘creationist’ philosophies of reality, which guided by human ego-trips of self-importance and a misunderstanding on the relationships between mind-mirrors of reality (still languages that reduce all space-time beings and its life-death cycles to a minimalist mirror, either verbal or mathematical), have come to believe *that it is not reality what languages mirror, but languages create reality; an idea as absurd as to think that the mirror image of reality IS the origin of it. CONTRARY to belief this creationism is not only the origin of verbal religions where God creates beings by ‘naming them’ in arab (Islam) or Hebrew (Judaism) but also the view of most physicists who think God creates reality with mathematical equations, source of many of the problems of present physics, where the writing of an equation must mean that a reality exists behind it (from strings to big-bangs to evaporating black holes) despite like of evidence. *

So those are the main themes and tasks accomplished in this blog:

∆§: to understand the scalar structure of the organic Universe and all its beings, in which smaller parts with ‘faster time cycles and hence more information stored in the form and frequency of those cycles’, co-exist in symbiosis with larger scales with slower cycles but more ‘energy and motion’.

ð: And to understand the finite cycles of time, of life and death, of creation, evolution and extinction, which all vital spaces and species follow, as they follow 3 ‘arrows=dimensions’ of timespace in its daily actions, which can be classified as ‘entropic, lineal moving actions’, informative, cyclical ones and its ‘energetic’ balanced actions, which slowly ad up to create a general arrow of time towards more information, the arrow of life, ending always with the warping and wrinkling of ‘form’ has become overwhelming, in an explosion and dissolution of information, with inverse properties, called the arrow of entropy and death.

*It is then essential to incorporate two new dimensions of space-time between scales, the 4th dimensions of pure entropic death, when a system dissolves downwards at maximal speed of time in its whole becoming an extended ‘unconnected’ herd of ∆-1 parts; and the arrow of social evolution upwards, as wholes become organically connected into ternary networks and decametric efficient societies of ‘numbers’. *

Thus besides the 3 canonical dimensions of space, which can be seen also according to Galilean relativity, as motions in time (since we cannot distinguish form and motion), we must add a motion downwards in scale, dissolving our whole into its parts (fourth dimension of ‘entropy’ or death) and a motion upwards in scale to emerge as a larger whole (5th dimension of social evolution). Those 2 arrows require two dimensions because they are not commutative – a motion towards death and dissolution of information is NOT the same that a motion towards social organisation, and life coordination.

The Universe is a super organism of 5Dimensions of time and space. Humans understanding of it, is at best merely epistemological, based in observations of a very scanty part of that reality, then ‘treated’ into a diminishing quantity of information through 3 fundamental mirror languages, images, verbal, time-dominant and mathematical spatial dominant thought. So to expand a bit this limited realism we have to start from a wide expansion of our dimensions of reality, by understanding the… Galilean paradox

# 3 ðIME§PACE ARROWS=ACTIONS=MOTIONS

The substance of the ‘Universe’ are its 3 ðime motions, its intelligence its simultaneous, mental forms of §paœ’

ls on ∆ºst

I. Time: closed cycles that carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.

II. Duality. The inverse properties of space-time.

III. Holographic Principle: still bidimensional information and energy merge together.

IV. Layered dimensions: the building of space.

V. Fractal ternary structures, the generator equation: 3 time ages, 3 space topologies.

VI. The scalar fifth dimension: fractal points, networks of space, speed of time cycles.

I **CYCLIC, CLOSED ðIME§PACE**

* In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.*

**Multiple time changes and cyclical clocks.**

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions. Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.*

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity.

But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of ‘fractal, discontinuous’ space-time cycles, whose beats and synchrhonicities only when pegged together create the impression of absolute space-time Universe, as we are all made of spatial energy, vital space and temporal cycles that carry our information in the speed and form of its cycles.

**Informative computer and life cycles.**

For example, computers process information and they are basically a series of time cycles, digital clocks. So both time and computers are measured by the speed of its time cycles, in frequency Herzs, Tiƒ. So we said that a computer is more intelligent when it has more ‘gigahertzs’, when his time cycles run faster, when its ‘speed of time is faster’.

What do then a computer time cycles have to do with space? Nothing. There time is still a measure of information, carried in the form of its logic circuits and the speed at which the algorithms of those logic circuits are traced. But now it is NOT measuring the information on the speed and distances of space.

Consider the evolutionary time rhythms discovered by Darwin. Evolutionary time measure the rhythms of change in the form, hence in the in-form-ation of beings. So the fittest species, those with more efficient forms and which act faster in time survive. Think of in-form-ation as ‘form-in-action’, because it is what time is. We perceive time cycles which are, forms in motion, changing forms, temporal forms, forms-in-actions, informations.

The problem though with physicists, as we have said is their worldly profession which has always been to make ENTROPIC weapons (70% of them still work in the US as makers of weapons). So power corrupts, and their military power corrupts their attitude towards other scientists.

So its work biased its view on time. And i*nstead of the much wider concept of multiple time arrows, in a Universe made of space-time beings, **Time in physics uses a single arrow of ‘lineal time-entropy’, as its worldly profession – to make energetic machines – has limited its studies of time-motions.*

*In the graph, *Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola. But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’ (sic):

*Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. We are often unaware of the influence of culture in science. Our worldview based in the ‘science of lineal motion’, physics is deeply influenced in its philosophy of science and interpretation of data by the technologic, machine-based culture and profession of physicists. *

As Europe expanded its military empires physicists lineal worldview on time became global, and time all over the world was measured with a single mechanical clock equalizing to the standard second of lineal duration, all other cycles of the Universe – never mind all those mechanical clocks were also made with spheres and cycles, including Galileo’s pendulum clock!

Yet in the XX century, scientists widened their comprehension of time, in a separate new arrow – that of information, and finally, I was able to put the 3 concepts together.

BUT physicists think what they study is ALL what we must know on time. And all other forms of time, informations and beings IRRELEVANT to the ultimate nature of things. Alas, power imposes its view. So whenever you pretend to explain people, scientists and of course physicists, the much wider meaning of time, it is like if you were committing a blasphemy against the religion of time-physics: s=ct≈vt. And that’s all.

So Physicists introduced two reduction of the whole concept of time in nature – to reduce it to study a single type of form in motion, in-form-ation – the translation in space of physical systems or ‘locomotion’. And to reduce and equalise all the clocks of nature, from orbital systems, to living systems and their world cycles, to evolutionary cycles, to mental cycles, and logic cycles, to a single clock tic – that of the clock. So they came with the infantile concept that time has a single tic, and that tic is like the clock, a steady tic. Yet it is evident as you have experienced with the growing speed of time of your computers and mobiles that even among mechanisms there are different speeds in their clocks, and this speed increases with the evolution of the clocks that keep processing ever more information.

And, so happens in nature, where new species are ever faster in their clocks of time. So mammals are faster than reptiles faster than plants. And the next ladder in the evolution, robotic machines are faster than men – and for that reason they are displacing us in all informative processes, as the new white collar pcs, blue collar workers and terminator soldiers, in fields of labor and war (cause of the present existential crisis of mankind, hidden by our financiers and economists working for corporations that make money with them).

So to me the first, most obvious error about Nature, was the way in which humans tried to IMPOSE their gadgets and machines of time measure over the Universe, WITHOUT any respect of the beauty the different rhythms of that Universe showed.

So I threw my mechanical clock, and never have worn one.

Since the first obvious human, mechanical bias is the way in which we measure time. We do NOT use any longer as we used to do the cyclical rhythms of nature, but the mechanical clock, and try to reduce all the cycles of nature to that mechanical clock and its steady state one second rhythm. And we pretend that is the ‘absolute time rhythm and only one of the Universe!

This is akin to the old ways of astronomers who tried to impose to the Universe the frame of reference of the Earth as its center. It does work despite its bias, so with complicated cycles you can explain it all, from the point of view of the Earth, but calculations become very complex with epicycles and extant, etc.

So happens when you do NOT use the clocks of Nature, which soon will be defined here. Physics does work but it is overall very complicated when dealing with different time rhythms, and one century after Einstein found there are many such time rhythms and some change its speed, there is zero understanding of this. We just put some ‘new epicycles’ called Lorentz Transformations, but since we are stuck to our ethnocentric clock, as old astronomers to their earth-centric world, the explanations are blurred. Men merely try to feed the Universe onto their ‘time view’ or rather mechanical view of time. And the Universe is much ore complex and rich in clock rhythms than that.

Indeed, why we Humans use a mechanical clock with an artificial rhythm to measure time; IF the Universe has infinite rhythms? It is just an ego trip and the worship of machines that characterize the western civilization. Thus when the Brits got to China to sell their ware, was the answer of Tao=time masters: why we want to buy your ugly mechanical clocks if we can observe the Universe with its clocks of nature, its cyclical rhythms? Obviously, the mechanical clock with its single steady state time cycle IS a human artifact.

Time did exist before mechanical clocks with his own rhythms. Its own Universal time clocks. The mechanical clock is NOT a Universal time clock. So the use of this human clock to measure all the time clocks of the Universe bias our concepts of time, and ‘hides’ the clocks of nature. So the next fundamental question in our search for proper definitions of time, entropy and black holes becomes obvious:

– What are the true clocks of nature? And once we find how Nature measure its cyclical time frequencies, we shall wonder are those rhythms of time stable, steady state rhythms as those of our mechanical clocks, or they change rhythms, have different ‘time speeds? And how they measure information and create it, as opposed to the creation of disorder and entropy? And which of those concepts order or disorder dominates the Universe?

This huge gap between the capacity of man to make instruments and his theoretical power is indeed remarkable and we shall have a laugh at it at the end (sorry I cannot stop being insolent). T.S. Elliot put it in verse, when he marveled on the passion of humans for theorizing about the meaning of reality when the were so obviously ‘not gifted’ for it.

The bias introduced by anthropocentric, mechanocentric clocks to measure all the times of the Universe.

And this is at the core of the present mechanical worldview, sponsored by physicists, which we will try to upgrade from the larger perspective of philosophy of science, seeking for the principles that unify all disciplines of knowledge:

Physicists have excellent machines to measure time, but they distort with them the true rhythms of Nature. So they cannot understand what time truly is… Yet only the best of them – Feynman, Einstein, Landau – recognise this huge gap between ‘measuring and understanding’.

So Landau said laughing at the way humans measure time:

“There is not time uncertainty, I just look at my watch and know the hour’ – meaning physicists distortion of time with its mechanical clocks fogged our understanding of the true nature of time.

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

**The equation of the mind.**

Time space though has also a psychological point of view, as it carries information. So from the pov of the mind time is the speed of processing information ha gives us he feeling of time passing, and it is also, the origin of the equation.

The point of view is an observer that gauges reality with its first action, O, a mere rotation in space-time.

The cycle thus evolves into a point of view with angular momentum, the minimal action of the Universe. And in this manner starts its adventure, through the function of existence, till completing its worldcycle of life and death in space time.

We are all worlds of spacetime, worldcycles which go on doing cyclical actions between birth and death – just a travel of a worldcycle through the 5^{th} dimension, which encompasses them all, and orders its species through a new dimension of time, from past to future, from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, from the infinitely slow to the infinitely past, back and forth, back and forth, Sp < => Tƒ <= >Sp…

The 5 i-logic postulates define the unit of reality as a fractal point that observed in detail is in itself a World, which contains within it all the mathematical topologies of the 4D cosmos. This can be deduced in a logic manner, through the equation of a mind/p.o.v., which can map out as a mirror the whole Universe we perceive in its infinitesimal mirror.

In the fractal Universe all systems of i-logic information gauge reality, transforming a force they absorb into a logic language, which mirrors the Universe. It is obvious that the essential particles, quarks, photons and electrons cannot have a wide mapping of reality unless the fractal scales of size are infinite (and then an atom might be the upper bound of a new scale – a nano-galaxy).

Yet even if reality has upper and lower limits of size and point-like particles are not fractal world but the limit of universal form, those simple particles still gauge information and store some type of logic, mathematical computer-like structure that allows them to behave as they do, organically. Since particles orientate their position in a herd of self-similar particles; they move towards light, its energy, when the electromagnetic field is in its neighborhood and they decouple=reproduce into new particles when they absorb more energy.

All those properties are the minimal properties we ascribe to a fractal ‘point of view’ or ‘mind’ in a broad sense – a structure that gauges energy and information, creating smaller fractal mirrors of reality. Such structure has within itself a minimal amount of geometric paths and logic processes that allow it to form the forces it uses as energy and information source. We thus call such structure a mind. Since any point of the Universe becomes a focus of infinite parallel forces that flux into the point, creating a static image of reality in Complexity, we define a Mind, as an infinitesimal mirror-world that reflects the infinite Universe:

* 0 (Mind-cell) × ∞ (Universe) = Linguistic Wor(l)d*

The equation of the mind, defined by the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulates of illogic geometry, sets limits of truth in linguistic science, comparing the worlds created by any mind and the Universe at large, much bigger than any informative, mental, linguistic image we have of it.

It is however the why that explains why entropy doesn’t dominate the Universe; since now the increase of order and information in the Universe is mainly caused by those ‘perceptive points’ that gauge information. Those points might or might not be conscious in a vegetative or reflexive way, depending on its complexity; but they are ‘aperceptive’ – an expression coined by Leibniz to express perception without consciousness. And so they have a will to order and perceive more information, not only a will to feed and increase their energy. And so there are two ‘wills’ of feeding and gauging common to all points, which we can measure objectively, externally by the fact that when energy appears, particle move towards energy (so electrons jump and feed on light) and when other particles appear they gauge their distances. We observe this property in all systems when they form a focus, which emerges as the point of maximal order in which the network of the system integrates its information.

Then the system becomes more stable: A crystal grows faster when the network creates a central point. A hurricane can be destroyed when the central, still point where all the flows converge is disturbed. A life being becomes erratic in its motions when it becomes blind. A galaxy acquires order when a black hole, which probably gauges gravitational information, appears in its center.

The existence of an infinite number of such points is undeniable objectively and adds an enormous amount of order to the Universe, which mechanist science does not account for. Stillness to focus information into a pixeled map of the Universe, and the existence of a network that fluxes in that point through which ‘infinite parallels’ can cross, are the two conditions of formation of gauging points.

Then we can establish the birth of a complementary network of energy and information, an exi=stential point: exi=k; where k represents a ‘mapping of reality’ in the informative language that the waves of communication of the point with the external universe have created. This means that the models of metric measure developed by mechanist science merely creates a ‘space-time world’ self-similar to the mind of man in our machines, which does not exhaust all the measures of the Universe and its possible mappings. We cannot construct if we want to account for all the cycles of time, dark spaces and events of reality, a theory based only in a continuum, mechanical, light-space and its Euclidean coordinates of light-measure.

The limits of that model have been reached, as the limits of precision of the Ptolemy’s model of astronomy were reached in the Renaissance. Those limits of an Euclidean, continuum space-time were proved by Riemann, Poincare, Mandelbrot and this author, expanding and completing the Euclidean postulates. Einstein applied part of those new models and created Relativity Theory. This work applies the rest of those discoveries to create a model of Multiple Space-times, which includes the concept of absolute relativity, where measure – the gauging and mapping of the external universe by a non-Euclidean point, is relative to the observer and the rods of measure it uses.

And the process of reducing and stopping the motions of the Universe in that process is the first step to fully understand both relativity of motion and the structure of the mind.

In that regard, a deep error in mathematical physics and its models which ignore the 3 arrows of time, is the use of a faulty logic in mathematics and physics based in single causality.

**The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality**

Indeed, modern mathematical physics is based in the Axiomatic Method of mathematics, ‘invented’ by Hilbert, which is based in Aristotelian one-dimensional Logic.

Hilbert affirms then that we can deduce ALL mathematical statements using the logic available to science a century ago, called Aristotelian logic based in:

– A simplistic single time arrow, so A causes B, means that B does NOT cause A. This is false.

In reality logic is a ternary, dialectic, Hegelian logic, because there are 3 arrows of time, and its corresponding ‘simultaneous’ 3 organic elements in space:

A< ≈ > B.

That is A-energy and B-information come together into ≈, the present space-time being, or space-time action, or synthesis. And we shall see how this writes as the 3 arrows of time and symmetric forms of space: A (relative past energy) x B (relative future information) = C-relative repetitive present

– The exclusion of the third element, (only A and ¬ A are relevant), which has NOTHING to do with the aforementioned ternary logic of the Universe and its ternary symmetries in space (3 dimensions of space), parallel to the 3 ages of time. So length is the dimension of the function of lineal motion, height the dimension of perception and information, and width the dimension of reproduction. And 3 dimensional motions of space-time come together to form A:

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 FORMS & FUNCTIONS, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as ALL combined the ternary elements of the Generator EQUATION, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or SIMULTANEOUS, spatial organisms.

In the Universe X^{3} + Y^{3 }≠ Z^{3}. means we have only X^{2} bidimensional waves of space and time cycles, and the 3^{rd} dimension is added layer after layer of bidimensional networks. we live in a mathematical Universe but limited by mathematical laws of symmetry and balance that mimic the laws of the ternary fractal reality. The units of reality are Sæ and To, the poles of entropy and cyclical form, its bidimensional constants of angular momentum c2 speed-space or mass vortex.

This 2 dimensional, network plane that joins points along a shared energy and information collective action or unit of existence can be a field of magnetism and one of electricity a gravitational gradient and a particle, a group of citizens communicated or connected by a satellite, in all of them we can define a network with a relative fractal dimension, which we average to one made of networks of points, which contact perpendicularly through mere derivative fictions along a space-time field with other beings, this modular game of existence.

But the LONG TIME ARROW OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION OF PARTS INTO WHOLES, studied by the 5th dimension, and by Theory of Evolution meant nothing to him.

Neither the CYCLICAL TIME ARROW of 3 ordered time ages, past-energy, present reproduction and future information which defines the existence of all ‘world cycles’ from human life to matter. Though he found its dual equation, Energy (expansive entropy-past)<≈light-present-wave: c²>M(time vortex-future) he still ignored its essential meaning. So he would say ‘time is what a clock measures’; and used it fundamentally as Galileo, only to study of the all the ypes of time motions of the Universe,for the analysis of external time-motions, which is the restricted ‘job’ of physicists.

Time however has BESIDES PRESENT, DIFFERENTIAL, external motion-measures in space (Galileo’s V=∂s/∂/t and Einstein’s S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-(ct)²), other type of time-motions, mainly informative evolutions (Evolutionary theory in Biology, vortices of evolution in masses, historic vortex of evolution, future 3rd age of maximal form and in-form-ation), and present, reproductive wave-bodies.

And it is fractal, in infinite different waves, reproductive bodies, entropic limbs and fields, informative particles and heads, whose geometry stores maximal information in minimal space (so all relative future, informative, gauging particles, heads and cameras are geometric).

** The 5th dimension of scalar space-time puts together 3 co-existing planes of the super organism.**

*In the graph, the 3 basic isomorphisms of all Universal organisms, which display 3 bidimensional space-time parts, the toroid entropic limbs/fields that imprinted by cycles of temporal information stored in heads/particles, Tƒ, combine in bodies and waves that iterate the system: Thus all systems have a spatial, topological assembly of 3 organic parts, that will exist causally 3 ages of evolution of its forms through those 3 topologies, and will in the process establish a series of åctions in time, combination of their vital energy and information with the ‘complex world of U±4 planes of existence around it.*

*Now the function of existence is a different ‘equation’ and ‘concept’ and ‘system’ in the Universe, and that is the beauty and complexity of it: a simple structure, a series of cycles of time, imprinted over an energy body/wave field, which ‘moves’ through a larger space-time world, in which it exchanges quanta of energy and bits of information, can have an infinity of varieties.*

*And this is due to the 3 ^{rd} fundamental characteristic of the Universe: to be made of smaller parts that organize themselves into bigger wholes, that is to be part of a scalar reality of multiple space-time fields of different size in its quanta of energy and bits of information.*

So when studying a physical time§paœrganism the best way to do it, given our scanty direct perception of them, is through some of its actions, in which they will move and process information in a certain pattern, within a larger super organism, which in the case of the particle will normally be an atom.

As such within the atom, the particles are either part of its t-membrane, its st vital space or its •Singularity with its still focused mind, which humans represent as a centre of a frame of reference, in any of its 3 ‘topological space-time dimensions.

What is the perception of each mind-singularity mapping its territory according to its function is of interest. Even more is to find suitable frames of reference to model the 10D (5s≈5t) time§paœrganism.

Normally we can consider its asymmetries to make a possible focused mathematical mirror, giving to space the positive real coordinates, time its negative, and the scalar 5th dimension set on the Y≈ i-coordinates, and combine them to represent different s, t, st states… the possibilities of mathematical modelling of the 10 Dimensions of space-time and scale, self-centred in an S@ singularity with a constrain given by a T-membrane enclosed the being to its domain of scales, topologies and functions, is ginormous and only apt for the imaginative mathematicians.

The ones physicist use (phase, multidimensional, conformal, Lorentzian, Hilbertian, etc.) are shows of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis done in a limited range of dimensions and or fractal points often with its own ternary dimensions, to study different ‘fancy’ analysis of partial domains of Tœs of many different scales of reality.

We shall try to set a more orderly standard now that we know what we talk about.

The studies of physicist in that sense are often of 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension).

And when philosophising about entropy arrows, studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe.

The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time.

As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.

An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules.

A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.

The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies.

MOTION=YOUTH, WITH INCREASING ENERGY ORDER AND DECREASING ENTROPY TILL REACHING THE REPRODUCTIVE STATE OF BALANCE, AND THEN OF INFORMATION, DYING THEN INTO DISORDERED, SCATTERED MOTION, TO RESTART AGAIN:

*Γ@: Seed of information + energy<entropy = reproductive phetus<emergence<motion (entropy with a bit of form) > energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death*

*=zero sum*

So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:

*4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§*

**The duality of Compact Time-Space dimensions and tridimensional analysis.**

Further on, as science compacts the past and future cycles of beings, by extending present time along a lineal coordinates of infinite time duration, we have also extended the 5th dimension or ∆-scale by extending it up and down, through the metric of scalar space-time, to encompass all the ∆-scales of the Universe.

This simpler analysis gave us the opportunity to study the metric of al the ∆-scales of the Universe, ∆=Sp x Tƒ, and learn a lot of general properties of scalar space-time. But the analysis of only a 4th and 5th dimension of time and isomorphic scales is limited and of little use when we analyze an specific ‘variety’ or ‘species’ of scalar space-time in detail.

The limits of compact analysis can be compared to a study of Space with vectors, which put together the 3 ‘dimensions’ of space into a single element, the vector, which flows free as a single dimensional being in the volume of the Universe. The usefulness of vectorial analysis is undeniable for many spatial studies, which it greatly simplifies, but most often when we want to do detailed calculus we must consider the 3 spatial dimensions/components of the vector, X, Y and Z.

So happens when we want to study in depth the world cycle of life and death of any being. We cannot get very far just using a lineal time duration (the world line of physicists), which will tell us little more beyond the motions of the being taken place by the interaction of the individual with its ∆-4 scale of ‘force’. And of course, because unlike in vectorial calculus, where the artifact of a compact single space dimension is understood as an ‘artifact’ and decomposed when needed in its 3 dimensions, one of the reasons scientists cannot understand time processes such as the life-death cycle in depth, so easily resolved in ∆ST is due to the fact they do ignore it all about the past and future, Tp and Tƒ dimensions of Time, and its ‘cyclical’ quantized nature; which they have deformed with the lineal duration artifact.

Again we could consider the parallels with the single vectorial analysis of one dimension of space. The easiest way to study vectors with a single dimension is in the cyclical ‘Argand’ complex plane, which defines a vector with a ‘modulus’ and an angle, so we do not need the 3 components. But this ‘cyclical, complex plane’ is not real.

The spatial reality of this ∆-scale of light-space ‘alone’ without the curvature caused by the ∆-4 forces of the gravitational scale is Euclidean lineal, as the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light are. So the proper way of studying with detail – which always get us closer to reality – space dimensions is in a 3 coordinates of perpendicular ‘light-space’. The simplification of the complex plane helps calculus as we all know but it must not be accepted as ‘real space’. Nobody does because all know the ‘real 3Euclidean space’.

For the same reason the lineal time duration that simplifies the 3 ages of cyclical time should not be considered as real.

Beings thus have bodies/waves made of energetic planes v^{2}) and cycles of time encoded in informative bits in particles/heads. Those particles heads control the body to perform a series of time cycles that carry information in the frequency and form of those cycles (particle/head). And all that happens, (Sp x I) thanks to a larger world-universe, ST where those cycles happen.

The acronym ‘ExI=ST’, is not only a expression of the fundamental events of space-time taking place of the Universe it is also a philosophical equation, ‘the function of existence’.

Since we affirm that the Universe is the complex Union of a series of fractal points, Tƒ, which create bodies and waves, ∑ that exchange energy and information with the Universe, ExI, in iterative space-time cycles or ‘åctions’, ST, across several Universal Planes of Existence: u±4.

In essence the game of existence has 3 elements: a particle, head of information, attached to a body-wave of energy, which we write depending on which parameters and ‘state’ (still or moving) we perceive those fundamental parts of systems, Se x Tƒ, ST>Tƒ, exi, ST, etc. This dual system, exists in a larger world-Universe, Stu±4 where it extracts its energy and information, often with a limbic/field system that allows it to absorb and emit quanta of energy and bits of information with whom interact with the Universe.

Those 3 components: a head/particle of temporal cycles of information in command of a mixed, reproductive, energy-information body, which extracts quanta and bits of energetic motion and cyclical information, Ø=O x |, (geometric expression), from an external Stu±4, enormous universe, bring together reality. Reality is a puzzle of ExI=ST4, existential heads/bodies, particles/waves exchanging energy and information, spatial motions and cyclical clocks of time, | x O in iterative åctions, Ø, ∂a, e, i ,o, u which build up the symphony of fleeting existence across worldcycles of life and death of its Existential variations.

A Generator equation of an increasing series of more complex topological species, fractal Points, networks, worlds, and organisms and Universes of Space-time, U: ∑ ExI=ST, which we shall call the function of existence,. The function of existence in that sense is a generator equation of a fractal, in this case the universe.

And as all ‘fractals’ equations’ the ‘mother-generator’ is a dynamic ‘feed-back equation’ that ‘reproduces’ fractal worldpoints made of space and time, two ‘topological substances’ (geometrical forms with motion) of which all parts of the Universe and its ‘assemblies’, ‘systems’ and ‘organisms’, are made:

What ∆ST models of relational space-time studies are systems that combine such 2 elements, Spatial Energy and temporal information of which all what exists is made.

This requires a more sophisticated understanding in philosophical and perceptive terms of the two parameters that compose the Universe, time and space, now enlarged into two key dualities:

– Space becomes now spatial energy, as vacuum space is a moving sum of energetic quanta, S=∑e. So we can perceive ‘space-distances’ also as ‘energetic motions’, a duality that physicists ignore with their philosophy of ‘naive realism’ but will be fundamental to understand the Universe. We call this duality, the ‘Paradox of Galileo’, since Galileo realized the Earth moved despite our perception of a still planet (e pur si muove, e pur no muove.)

-And time becomes much more than ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein). It becomes temporal information, as every time clock that closes a cycle creates a bit of information, T=∑Tƒ. Again we can define then information as the still perception of time cycles, according to the Paradox of Galileo.

**∞ Space-time beings.**

In the Universe there are infinite clocks of time, that humans simplify with the human speed of time, in order to measure reality with a human point of view. But a more objective, wider view of the Universe will consider each different time clock as a separate entity and each different size of space as a different spatial scale. And this is what the 5th dimension does, enlarging the simple analysis of all those scales of size and time speeds as a single space-time continuum (the 4th dimension):

This huge conceptual advance allow us to unify the two fundamental fields of science, Biology, which studies systems made of bodies of energy and heads of information and Physics, which studies fields of energy directed by particles of information, moving in a ‘background of space-time’. Why?

Because now those fields are made in fact of spatial energy and those particles are knots of clocks of temporal information. In other words, the ‘abstract’, mathematical Cartesian frame of space-time becomes a human ‘artifact’ that ‘sees’ as a continuum a puzzle of entities made of space and time. We are NOT in a background of space-time.

We are made of space and time, of spatial energy and temporal information. When we say I don’t have energy and time to do this is because we know subconsciously that we are made of a vital space that contains energy, our body and a brain that regulates our time cycles.

So it is a machine, made with a computer, sum of digital clocks and a body of iron regulated by those cyclical clocks.

So it is a physical entity made of energy that occupies space and particles, masses and charges that MUST be described as clocks of time, ‘vortex’ that turn in cyclical motions, as our pictures of them show – NOT particles with a substance but knots of time clocks.

Thus we consider that most systems of the Universe are ‘complementary systems’ made of lineal fields/bodies of energy/space quanta and cyclical heads/particles of temporal information. In the graph we can see how reality is made of infinite clocks of time that carry information. So we blow the absolute time of the 4th dimension in infinite details: T=∑o

And we blow the single Space, S in infinite surfaces of energy in motion: S=∑Sp.

Since in the new paradigm there are infinite clocks of time that measure with different frequencies different forms of information. And there are infinite spaces that store energy in motion.

And the duality between those 2 ‘arrows or motions of space-time’, lineal motion, space or entropy and cyclical motion, clocks of time or information, either perceived in stillness as lineal or cyclical form or in motion as lineal speed or cyclical speed structures the Universe.

All what you see are combinations of those 2 essential substances, very complex sometimes, but combinations of 2 elements, and the laws of those combinations is what the 5th dimension studies, since once we group them all we find regularities, synchronicities, patterns tat allow us to define space and time as a whole.

In the graph we see lineal motions forms (lineal bodies, weapons, fields of energy-light) and its complementary systems of information processing of time processing (cyclical eyes and cameras, electric fields of light).

So we define in 5D metric* *– *caused by the Isomorphism of topological forms- *a fundamental particle-system:

*Se (bodies/fields) < x > Tƒ(particles/heads)= K (Stable physical/biologic system)*

Se-parts move the whole system. Thus they are lineal planes, the shortest distance between 2 points – from light to legs or planes. While Tƒ-parts gauge information so they are cycles or spheres, the geometries that store more information in lesser space, from eyes to particles to brains. The outcome is a diffeomorphic Universe, made of 3 Invariant, topological forms, O-cyclical, Sp-lineal & Sp X Tƒ conic parts in 2D or Hyperbolic, spheres & toroid zero-points in 3D, put together into Se < = > Tƒ complementary systems.

*What is the minimal exi=k, complementary system of energy and information? Physicists will notice that the 5D Generator is the same equation than the minimal ‘action’ of quantum physics, exi=k, or minimal complementary system = quantum of space-time.*

But there are many systems, all what exist we might say is a complementary system with a particle-head of information and field-body of energy:

– This is the fundamental principle of quantum physics, the complementary principle, as quantum physicists observe all entities BOTH as particles and fields of energy (waves).

– This is the fundamental principle of biology as all cellular bodies have a DNA, informative center, and all multicellular organisms have a head besides its body.

You are also literally made of ‘clocks of time’ (your brain) and body motions with energy. So you say ‘i don’t have time or energy to do this’, because *we are all made of time and space. we are not in an abstract background of space and time, we are made of pieces of spatial energy and temporal information*.

Further on because now time and space are both motions, it is possible to transform one into the other,* by changing their form*, which is the true meaning of the Principle of Conservation of Energy and Information:

* ‘All what exists are systems of energy and in/form/ation that trans/form into each other ad eternal: Sp < = >Tƒ’.*

Another event explained by the 2 universal motions=forms is the equation Sp=Mc2, in which lineal energy becomes in-form-ation – a mass clock: when energy reaches its c-speed limit and keeps absorbing energy from a field (i.e. a synchrotron) the new energy is deviated into a higher dimension of information, creating a mass vortex, which will increase its rotational acceleration=mass=(equivalence principle).

**THE PANTHEIST UNIVERSE: EXISTENTIAL FUNCTIONS. THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF SCALAR SPACE-TIME.**

**Theme:** We introduce the 10 isomorphisms of the Universe. We will merely enunciate them, and then study each one in more detail in its different ‘names’ (click in the above 2nd line).

**The Existential Function: Œi**

The function that maximizes åctions of existence is the world cycle with its perfect Hamiltonian solutions of 3 dimensions that become a zero sum, slowly raising information in a cyclical vortex of higher time frequency and then exploding in no time, into pure energy, lowering two scales.

**We could IN THAT **sense consider the Universe a game of worldcycles. Points that from an upper perspective are nothing but motions, momentum of a diminutive force, but within themselves, they are full universes:

I=∆-1. That is any infinitesimal of ∆+1 is an infinite of ∆-1, from the lower perspective of its Universal Planes.

**Scalar åctions of space-time: to exist**

The metric of the 5^{th} dimension has infinite applications, specially when we relate them to the åctions of space-time, which happen precisely as exchanges of energy and information within different scales of the 5^{th} dimension, hence with different speeds in its frequency according to the ‘speed’ of the 5D scale from where the system absorbs it’s æ,e,ï,œ,û elements. Such as the ‘frequency steps’ of each action increases when the U, scale from where the action ‘quantum bit’ is taken.

Thus since motions relates to the absorption and emission of quanta from the smallest, gravitation/string fields ∂a≈∆U±4, its action are so constant that seem continuous.

Then information, absorbs bits from the electromagnetic, first perceptive scale, and its åctions are very fast, in the human case gathered in seconds of thought: ∂o ≈∆U±3.

Next comes feeding, which in humans is daily, fine-tuned to the rotation of the larger Earth, or absolute Space-time World of living beings (broken according to the ternary principle of differentiation often in 3 meals): ∂e≈∆U±2

Reproduction comes next, which is fine-tuned to the larger Sun’s orbits, or absolute space-time world of the Earth, and tends to be yearly.

And finally the social evolution, ∂u, is the generational cycle, as it lasts the entire life of the being.

This lead us to the study of a fundamental branch of relational space-time åctions, the very same meaning of the world ‘relational’: the synchronization of the different speeds of space-time cycles according to size, which organizes the entire Universe as a cosmic harmony of infinite relational time-cycles.

The harmony of the Universe is the webbing of infinite synchronous space-time cycles of different scales of the 5^{th} dimension, which put together create complex organisms across U±1 internal space-time scales and U±≥2 external quanta-bit scales (from where ∂e, ∂i, ∂a bits are extracted)

The synchronicity of such åctions of space-time that web complex organisms and systems, in which the different speeds of those cycles act in symbiosis.

Let us consider an example. Cells with faster cycles reproduce – a slow frequency action – everyday according to the daily feeding – a faster cycle – of the larger being, which is slower in its cycles, such as: ∂o x T∆-1≈∂e x Tƒ.

The previous equation of ‘existential algebra’, the study of cyclical åctions of space-time merely states that the frequency of a reproductive, ∂o, cycle of a cell of a lower scale of Size, ∆-1, T∆-1 is proportional to the frequency of a faster, ∂e, feeding cycle of a slower Tƒ system.

It is thus the task of relational space-time through the study of its space-time dualities, ∆-topologies, cyclical time ages and worldcycles and repetitive åctions of existence in space-time to classify them all, to know the details proportions and constants which define all the species of the pantheist Universe.

And to that aim, the main classification system is that of the åctions any form will develop in order to survive and hence exist in that Universe, which complete our overview of relational space-time.

Systems can only move in external space (∆a), absorb that external, lineal space as energy stored for future motions (∆e: storing of potential energy and transformation into kinetic energy); and again they can perceive the form, the information of external time cycles (∆ï) and reproduce their internal cyclical forms of time (∆œ). And finally they can gather ‘parts of internal space-time’ into wholes of absolute space-time: ∆U: ∑Se=S; ∑Tƒ=T.

Since to ensure ‘existence’ in present and future time beyond death, all those dual systems of waves/particles and bodies/heads of internal vital space and time cycles, will perform 5 åctions of ‘existence’ that improve their survival:

They will gauge information (∆ï) with its particles/heads and move in space (∆a) to locate and feed on fields of energy (∆e) with its waves/bodies to iterate/reproduce its form in an offspring of similar forms (∆œ), to last beyond death, and finally they will evolve socially from individuals into Universals (∆u) to become stronger, and succeed in its search for energy and information to iterate and survive. It doesn’t matter if this program of the 5 åctions of space-time is mechanical, geometric, logic, bio-logic or conscious. It HAPPENS because species that have followed this simple space-time program have survived. And it is that simple because it is a program based in the existence of only 2 ‘formal motions’ in the Universe, internal and external space-time.

Thus the program of existence is determined by the duality of external and internal space-time and the evolutionary, survival nature of ‘existence’. You either exist if you repeat yourself through this simple program into the future, or you fail in the program of absorption of energy and information in the external world to repeat your internal space-time and then you cease to exist, you become extinct. Simple, isn’t? Now we humans observe this program as everything else. And the program is to us the more evident in biological life beings.

This is all what animals do and so biologists call this program the ‘drives of life’, but humans follow the same program (though we don’t like to recognize it as such, given ego-trips of freedom). And the same program is followed by physical systems (so the same anthropomorphism make us deny since Descartes falsely divided ‘matter’ and ‘mind’, with its pious religious beliefs, as two different realms).

So before we go along, we will consider the previous example: electrons, the simplest particle of the Universe of which we are all made (and quarks too), absorb energy, gauge light as information, move in an external field, iterate its form decoupling into new particles and evolve socially into atoms.

The coding of those 5 åctions is called the 4 quantum numbers: the principal quantum number defines the wave-motion of the electron around the atom, and it also shows its internal energy level (here external and internal motion coincides from the perspective of the human observer):

∆a, ∆e; the same electron gauges information, as it jumps when it sees a light photon and feeds on it, (∆e, ∆ï), ‘growing in size’, jumping its orbit, and this action is code by the second azimuthal quantum number; the same electron when it has enough energy and finds an inverse spin electron produces a seminal ray that creates new electron, and this action is code by its spin number, (orientation in space, similar to ‘gender’ in biological systems), and finally the magnetic number organizes multiple electrons to fit a social geometry. The coding of those electrons is thus mathematical, through geometric configurations coded by those numbers. And it ensures the stability and survival of the atom.

But if we go beyond human beings and observe the social structures of mankind, nations and civilizations, we shall see how we can study them also through those 5 åctions. As societies absorb energy from their environment (agriculture, raw materials: Economic system) ∆e; they move and reproduce historically their civilization in other regions of the absolute space-time of Earth. So today European cultures have daughter cultures from their age of empires (∆a, ∆ï), they evolve their information internally, and so civilizations become ever more complex in information (∆ï), and finally they grow socially till forming a Universal civilization, globalized mankind that fills the absolute space-time of humanity, planet Earth.

This simple function of existence will be in living systems, the body and head, which determines the existential momentum of the being, such as a top predator life system will be one which deploys maximal existential momentum, more intelligence with their head, which processes information and more energy with their body. And again, in physical systems, the particle with maximal momentum will survive better in collisions. So when a star and a black hole collide, the black hole survives and reproduces new black holes, and so on. While in societies, the nation with more information and military force always win wars and reproduces in the other nation its memes.

And the fundamental law of physical systems is the conservation of lineal and cyclical motions, lineal and angular momentum.

Further on, the derivative of momentum in physics is called ‘force’ F=∂(mv); which is a quanta of action’ in which the system employs part of its momentum to move or transfer its motion to other system. Thus Force would be described by the first of those åctions, ∂a. While on the other hand the ∫mv, the integration of all the existential momentum of a being throughout the sum of all its motions give us the total energy of the system, 1/2mv^{2}. And again those are the conserved quantities, whose balances in a physical system determine its main laws, since Newton found them for systems of mass, and latter Maxwell for systems of charges, (momentum, energy, balance of forces).

**Fractal Existences in Space and Time.**

By a fractal network we mean a network of fractal points, the fundamental unit of the Universe, a fractal ‘point of existence’, is *any closed system of the Universe with a minimal content of Energy and Information, ExI, which includes all physical systems (made of complementary particles of information and waves of energy) and all biological systems (made with heads/nuclei of information and bodies of energy), and all social systems (made of an upper class in control of the informative languages of society, its digital money and verbal laws that direct a body of citizens that act as the working energy of the society)*.

We thus expand easily the philosophical concept of a Universe made of fractal Systems of Energy and Information, to the ‘particle/wave, head/body, upper/middle class’ structure of reality.

But in reality there is a 3^{rd} element, as all systems exist in a larger world from where they extract energy and motion and bits of information, and where they reproduce and evolve socially with similar ‘fractal points’. Consider any ‘closed system’ with a volume of energy and information, any fractal point, let us say a particle or an atom, or a planet or a galaxy or a gas/liquid/solid mass of matter, or a social civilization. In such a system we shall immediately localize a mass of similar, ‘cells’, which form the bulk of the body of the system, a center of information and then a 3^{rd} element, lineal limbs/force lines which connect and disconnect the system from a larger world which gives energy and information to the system. That larger world, ST±4, is the whole Universe with whom the fractal point interacts with.

In which it iterates its åctions of accelerated motions, ∂a, energy feeding, ∂e, informative perception, ∂I, offspring reproduction, ∂o and Universals Creation, ∂U, processes that all fractal points follow.

Those åctions are ‘smaller’ motions, performed by the whole system, a ‘derivative’, ∆Ñ absorption or emission of |-space and O-Time, the two geometrical motions of the Universe, with the effect of provoking a translation in space, ∂a, an increase or loss of body energy-mass, ∂e, an increase of perception, ∂I, a reproductive seminal offspring ∂o, and a social evolution into larger groups in the scalar process of generation and growth into a full complex Universal, ∆-1=10^{10} I systems

**This is what we are…** Fractal Existences, which combine energy and information, ExI on iterative cyclical åctions of space and time, STU±4. What kind of cyclical åctions, with a form in space and a frequency in time, ‘fractal beings perform’?

Those which make them survive as a form of information, a form in action, an organic system. As 5 are the essential survival åctions of all beings, we used the acronym, æ,e,ï,œ,û to design them, with a ∆, delta symbol of growth or its mathematical equivalent, ∂, to signify them: ∆∑æ, changes in motion of beings (±∂v=a), ∆∏Tƒ changes in the information of beings

This huge conceptual advance allow us to unify the two fundamental fields of science, Biology, which studies systems made of bodies of energy and heads of information and Physics, which studies fields of energy directed by particles of information, moving in a ‘background of space-time’. Why?

Because now those fields are made in fact of spatial energy and those particles are knots of clocks of temporal information. In other words, the ‘abstract’, mathematical Cartesian frame of space-time becomes a human ‘artifact’ that ‘sees’ as a continuum a puzzle of entities made of space and time. We are NOT in a background of space-time.

**The change of paradigm, from abstract, non-exact measures, to fluid, topological life.**

Humans of course like simplicity and quantitative precision. It makes them feel safe, but the result is often shallow. Because the Universe is more complex than the human mind, which simplifies it to ‘fit’ all the information of reality in its small brain. So the mind is somehow ‘black and white’.

Fractals, which are at the core of the structure of ‘vital=moving spaces’ enacting ‘time cycles’, are more chromatic, with infinite varieties and combinations. A fractal is a logic-mathematical structure made of very few components, which can be expressed in a generator equation. Hence the simplicity of that generator equation of the Fractal Universe of Multiple Spaces and Times: Se x Tƒ = ST.

But that initial simplicity is deceptive, because the enormous richness of forms a fractal display come from the ambivalence of the 3 ‘elements’ of that equation: Spatial ‘—motions’, Time cycles and its ‘infinite’ combinations.

Thus we shall use the metric equation of the 5th dimension, which the ‘reader’ that has gone so far, will recognize as yet another kaleidoscopic expression of the Fractal Generator, to organize all those time cycles and spatial sizes and explain many phenomena from the ‘chip law’ (smaller chips think faster) to the laws of evolution and survival, to the genetic paradox (smaller cells code the information of slower, larger systems), to the role of black holes (which are smaller but much faster vortices of gravitational mass, with more attractive power), to the unification of charges and masses (which is an equation where a charge just turns much faster, than a mass, on in terms of ‘fixed spatial form’ has much more curvature or in terms of attractive power, is much more attractive as a faster hurricane or black hole is).

In each of those Planes of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in ‘—motions’, ‘or |-Motion’ which space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

And that duality is ‘defined’ by a metric equation: Se x Tƒ= R(i). That is, the product of the size or ‘—motions’ of a system and the speed of its informative time cycles, remains invariant across scales. So atoms are smaller then galaxies but turn much faster.

Thus we write:

*Max. Se ( maximal Spatial ‘—motions’ content) = Min. Tƒ ( Minimal Temporal, cyclical Speed).*

Since both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolisms. Yet the product of both parameters remains the same.

A fact that can be written as a ‘co-invariant’ equation, called the “metric of the 5th dimension”, which in its simplest expression defines the main planes of space-time of the Universe:

* Se x Tƒ=∆±4*

Whereas in static terms, Se means ‘spatial size’ and Tƒ, ‘cyclical form’ and in moving terms, Se means entropic, expansive, |-Motion and Tƒ means cyclical, implosive, informative motion.

And that duality must be fully grasp because it is at the bottom line of the fundamental meanings of reality.

Now we have to deal with the concept of space and the Galilean paradox, since space has motion but lineal, expansive motion, what is called usually ‘‘—motions’’ and sometimes ‘energy’. And we need to understand this fact to clarify those concepts.

In that regard, there is not so much difference between Galileo and Einstein. Both study changes in the motion and position of beings, calculating distances by mixing those two rods, light-space and human clocks in his equations to calculate with far more precision the motions of the Universe.

But the human clock is only one of the infinite rhythms of time of the Universe. Indeed, a second is just the time cycle of a human clock, but there are other cycles. A day is the cycle of the earth’s clock rotating around its axis. A year, is the Earth’s clock of the cycle that turns around the sun. Each ‘cycle’ that closes into itself is a clock of time. A mass that rotates is a clock of time. So it is a charge that rotates. There are infinite clocks of time.

Further on space is clearly discontinuous in the quantum scale. And there are many ‘scales’ of space not only light space. You have your own vital space without light inside. The space of the Universe is filled with broken pieces of ‘other substance’ than light. And so those 2 limits of Einstein’s work, the use of a single human clock and the consideration of space as only light space must be changed.

Einstein did some work on that sense with his expanded General relativity in which he tried to include the ‘invisible’ gravitational space that we know it exists because we feel gravitation but we do not see, because unlike light we do not see gravitation. But he still kept a single time and he could not to explain the vital spaces and time clocks of life of which evolution was taking care.

Indeed, the amazing fault of 4D physics, is its incapacity to explain all other phenomena in which time is a fundamental variable, including history and biology. So their pretension of being the ‘theory of time’ is misguided. But in as much as most people, including probably Einstein and Minkowski did not fully understand the limits of their inquire, it became trendy to boast the importance of their arguments. Those limits will become evident as we explain the new paradigm of multiple time clocks and points of measure.

Now it is important to understand why those paradigms have lasted so long and have been accepted with so much zeal. On one side there is the obvious mentality of men who believe mostly instead of reasoning, that is learn and memorize without much thinking theories as absolute truths.

But more important is the simple fact that each of those theories adapted perfectly to the quantity of data we had about the Universe from the point of view in which the theory was created.

The Germans and its ego-centered came from an age in which families lived in small groups and that was all what seemed to be the Universe. Then your nation and tribe was all what you could see; so a tribe could be God (Abrahamic religions). Then we saw the sun and the moon and the Earth seemed a center. Finally we expanded to planets and stars and we moved to the sun and light-space. Now we know about dark energy, quasars, dark matter, gravitation, circadian cycles, life cycles and we need to expand the point of view again to multiple time cycles.

** **

How can we interpret the interplay of points of timespace with motion and form we see around us, when we want to go beyond the actions of those points and its selfish point of view:

Answer, we transcend into U∆+1

The Union of infinite infinitesimal points of energy and information that give birth to a constant space-time plane.

The Universe is a game of 3 perpetual motions, which however synchronise its cycles of existence in time, *to create ternary, Γœ supeorganisms*, in such a form that a simultaneous, “perpendicular image” of them in ‘space’ shows a hidden, formal intelligence, as parts form networks ‘alliances’ of world cycles, which emerge as whole ∆+1, to become ternary complex subtle systems called super organisms, constantly varying in each ‘specific stientific species’ but with an underlying network structure, clearly recognisable.

SO a synchronous SERIES of flash images of a supeorganism in each ‘action’ will show it to be a world cycle of space-time, webbed by clone networks.

*In a Universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time and infinite speeds of time cycles, there is however a single way to order them: Γœ. Superorganisms tracing world cycles embedded in its function of existence, Γ.*

So as usual we play with similar terms. T.Œ, A theory of everything describes all the Γœ, super organisms of the Universe and its world cycles.

To order all those world cycles requires to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe.

But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time. Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower.

*This is a Universal law:*

Mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant.

So we can write in a first approximation: Sp x Tƒ = ∆ and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tƒ, whereas Tƒ is the fundamental symbols for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA.

*Let us then in the second part of this introductory post on the 3 elements of reality consider all together now, how fractal space-time beings trace its world cycles of existence, by varying the speed of its time cycles, the size of its spatial form, and organising themselves into networks that become complex organisms of energy and information .*

The simplest equation of space time is present energy = past entropy *operandi* future information.

How entropy is recollected by an operandi of future information tends to take then two different paths:

exi= s ±t.

**The unification of scales, through time clocks and space-quanta.**

The immense number of solutions the metric 5D equation brings to mathematical physics, is fascinating, including the Unification of G and k.

Since those 2 constants are merely the constants of ‘relative curvature and time speed’ of the largest and smallest gravitational and quantum scales of reality. So masses and charges, are vortices, which as space and time can be transformed into each other, can be considered as space-quanta hence curvatures (Einstein’s treatment of mass, Faraday treatment of charges as lines of force in space or field concept) and if we consider them cyclical motions of time, or clocks of both scales, as attractive vortices (Newton’s concept of mass and quantum concept of charge).

And so when we realise we are studying two fractal scales of the Universe, mathematically as I showed in that other article we can unify their values, and we shall find that the curvature of k, and its speed as an attractive vortex of space-time, is paradoxically 10 up to 40 times faster-stronger-more curved in the smaller k f charges than the larger, slower G of masses.

But the revolution of thought goes much further. For example, each scale we shall find to have a different faster or smaller clock of time (below some examples) and a larger or smaller Universal constant of space quanta. So the 3 scales of human perception, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale have 3 different clocks, ∆-1 ‘frequency’, ∆-temperature, and ∆+1 speed, and 3 different quanta of bidimensional space, H-planck (angular momentum), k (entropy) and M (mass).

And yet the beauty of it is that the metric of the 5th dimension always work.

** The bias of artificial time clocks and physics has limited our understanding of reality.**

The conclusion of the fractal paradigm is obvious:

Physical, human measures of reality with a single time and space are more complex specially at conceptual level than the more realist model, using the proper quanta of space measure (the so called Universal constants) and time clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed) but they do work. Moreover they have established a scientific praxis for 400 years that would be extremely costly to vary, as the Industrial revolution, converted the clock today evolved into a computer in the model of all temporal things, and the meter, today the speed of light, as the quanta of all spaces.

And so physicists are comfortable with this absolute space-time picture of reality. We, Philosophers of science, however are not practical beings, only concerned with the objective truths of the Universe. So we are not satisfied with Physicists’ models and the purpose of this blog is to establish a more objective picture of the Universe, using the different clocks of time and quanta of space we find in Nature (as science is ultimately the search for an objectivity that goes beyond the subjective human anthropomorphic view, so science moved from earth-centric models to heliocentric models, and should move from human time models into Universal time models).

So the quantic nature of space and cyclical nature of time was forgotten, and the fact that we are ‘relational space-time beings’, made of space quanta and time cycles, – Leibniz’s alternative model to that of Newton, remained ignored for 2 centuries.

Then in the XIX and XX century, new advances in mathematics, physics and biology made unavoidable the resurrection of the ‘real models’ of Nature, as Darwin found the evolutionary, time rhythms of nature and its species, which were neither infinite in duration, nor it follow the steady mechanical, artificial rhythm of human time clocks; Lobachevski found that space was indeed discontinuous, with different geometrical forms in different regions of the Universe, Einstein found time clocks were multiple and run at different speeds, and defined the quanta of the larger gravitational scale of size, or rest mass, while quantum theorists discovered in the other extreme of size, the H-Planck bidimensional quanta of angular momentum h, was also a constant; and Boltzmann found the Universal quanta of space of thermodynamic world, ‘Entropy’, was also a constant K.

When physicists discovered that in fact even the smallest spaces do have motion and are made of quanta, and Einstein discovered that the rhythms of time varied and had different speeds, the routines of this ‘simplistic’ Newtonian model had to be changed. As Einstein put it: ‘Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the entire scaffolding of western science from its foundations’.

Thus human concepts of a continuous absolute space and lineal absolute time, invented by Newton and the mechanical clocks, are no longer valid, and we must substitute them for the real concepts of nature and modern physics: a world of multiple space quanta with motion and a world of multiple cycles of time with different speeds.

Why a philosopher of science and not a physicist has completed such a model should be obvious to the reader. The philosopher of science is concerned with the big questions, what is time, space, energy information and with the unification of all sciences and scales of reality form quantum to astronomy through biology and social sciences. So themes of such wide range as those treated here are more proper of philosophers of science.

Further on, the philosopher of science departs not from the study of a specific type of space-time systems (physical systems of matter) but from the principle, laws and mathematical and logic languages of time and space, we humans use to perceive reality. Thus once the physicist gather experimental evidence with its instruments, he is at loss with the theoretical analysis on the widest possible terms of those experiments There is where the work fo the philosopher of science, master of languages of thought more than of machines of perception, comes in.

Since science is a logic, mathematical statement about reality, so there are also clear new advances on logic and mathematics, which in the XIX century r=evolved scientific thought and again have not yet fully incorporated into our models of reality.

Since science is based in mathematical languages, and language is based in geometry, scientists faced in the XIX century the shocking fact that Euclidean geometry is not truth; since the 5^{th} postulate of Geometry, which defines points with no breath, through which only a line also with no breath, can cross, proved false. There are different possible geometries, in which points do have breath, so several parallels can cross their volume, or points exist in a different surface through which no parallels exist.

How can we then introduce the new concepts of points with breath, surfaces with different numbers of parallels, in the scientific discourse of different sciences? Here again little advance was done, and so mathematicians at the beginning of the XX century decided to get away with the problem by merely NOT defining any longer the concepts of points, planes, lines and the relationships between them (their relative similarity or ‘congruence’ and the way they ‘intersect and lay on’). Thus two new false solutions were devised. On one side, instead of points and numbers, the classic units of mathematics that made them a realist science.

So physicists and philosophers of science have been aware for a century that space is quantic, with motion, and there are infinite time cycles-clocks in Nature. Yet the difficulty to re-define the fundamental original proposition of science, paralleled by the constant needs for merely parched the model.

Look around you. All what you perceive are 2 type of ‘forms in motion’, lineal forms that we shall call space, S, when perceived in stillness or lineal momentum, |-p, when perceived in motion, and cyclical forms, which we shall call time cycles or angular momentum when in motion, measured by frequency, |-Tƒ and information form when seeing in stillness.

And so those 2 elements, |-Spe and O-Tiƒ, spatial momentum and temporal form, and its infinite combinations, measured with different time clocks, frequency, temperature, speed and space quanta, H-Planck, K-entropy and M-ass, and integrated into different types of ‘energy and information’, is truly what all the Universe is made of. And so we can write a simple Generator equation of the Universe:

Ei= Sp x Tƒ for all scales of reality, which breaks down for the 3 main physical scales into the 3 most important equations of mathematical physics: E=hv (for the ∆-1 quantum scale), E=knT (for the ∆-human thermodynamic scale) and E=1/2mv² or E=mc² in Einstein’s relativity for the gravitational ∆+1 scale.

This never before explained meaning of the main universal constants and clocks of time of nature is the beginning of a revolution of thought that either humans or robots, if they survive the age of global weapons and war we live in, and preserve this planet for future human or mechanical generations, will research in depth, as it is the next step on the search of science for a non-anthropomorphic, scientific, objective description of the fractal, organic Universe. And the only model able to achieve…

We have used a loosely connected concept of space as lineal form with less motion that time a cyclical accelerated vortex to describe the fundamental game=law of the Universe, which is the constant beat back and forth between both formal motions. We can rephrase the game in many ways depending on how much information and varieties of that beat we include in the ‘sentence’

‘The Universe is a game of knots of space-time cyclical motions that switch back and forth between the states of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information, ad eternal’

It is today customary in the peculiar present frame of mind of the human species, with its cult(ure) of sensorial machines to reframe this game in terms of physical measures with metal-minds and its mathematical language as the principle of energy conservation. Otherwise the human ‘believer’ will not feel satisfied.

We obviously will do so in the posts on physics but not here. As ‘the languages of god are infinite’ (upanishads) and the way they express the underlying game of existence, also.

It is though important to consider that, being physics the study of motions, the game does have a strong physical content, namely its ‘motion properties or time’; as it has a strong mathematical content, ‘its formal properties or space’.

If we consider the game to be expressed in ternary terms as |-Sp<STœ>O-Tƒ elements, this how external motion and form will be the point of view of the ST present element.

But then when we seek beyond those 2 primary hows, we shall find the game actually has from the Tƒ point of view, a mental, psychological nature – namely to provide ‘perception to its 0-points of will that seek for positions of maximal perception at the centre of its territory.

And it has from the Sp-field/limb point of view a by extension of human sensations, some pleasure or sense of chaotic freedom when in motion.

Those internal points of view however are under the larger world view of the game, through its scales of the 5th dimension. There, the game has a teleological sense because beyond the Œn-plane of existence, the game does build co-existing super organisms, across multiple planes of existence, through elements, which are the most sophisticated of the game: synchronicities and co-existences, time travels and eusocial loving evolution. This is the level of understanding of the game in terms of its more complex fundamental element: as a SUPERORGANISM.

This said as always in the ternary expression of the Universe we can with the symbols of ¬Æ to express the game in 3 manners.

The fundamental beat of the Universe is the stop and go, form and motion, space and time beat of energy and information, informative perception and entropic pleasure, Sp>Tƒ>Sp>Tƒ>Tiƒ>Spe>Tƒ…

The importance of this beat of existence as one of the fundamental modes of being…

along the change of form, Tƒ<|s>Tƒ<|s>Mt<Spe>Mt<Spe…

And the beats of parts and wholes along the 5th dimension, ∂t=S : ∫S=t… compound the 3 dualities of what we call in a larger sense, ‘space and time’, the beats of existence.

In this post we shall study them in a generic way, complementary to their analysis with more formal rigour in the 3rd line (2-manifolds), in which we will analyse how a dimension of time and one of space come together into being.

Now, that such a beat exists in all scales and it is the fundamental mode of being, in all arts, in all expressions of the space-time cycle should be obvious from the point of view of the human observer, from which we always depart in our analysis of reality.

You stop and perceive and observe form, you walk then to the point you observe; and so two space-time actions are chained, also by this first beat of existence

∆i (gauging information)<∆a: moving towards a goal most likely < ∆e, feeding on energy…

Without perceiving form however the beat of existence cannot start its walk.

And the next step of the understanding of this beat of existence, is the parallelism between Space and Energy and Time and information, the still and go versions of this rhythm.

There are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries that move (called for that reason ‘topologies’).

Thus all systems can only have 3 kind of parts: Toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon); hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. In the graph, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show those 3 similar topologic structures. This similarity is called an ‘isomorphism’, iso=equal, morph=form.

**III. PHYSICAL SYSTEMS. **5D SCALES.

**The metric equation of the fifth dimension**

*In the graph, different ‘length of time-clocks in physical systems’ according to 5D metric: *

*Max. spe = min. Tƒi , Spe x Tƒi=K*

In the graph, the º∆±st three quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational main scales and main E(st) = Spe x Tƒi Equations of the physical Universe. And beyond the unobserved dark world. Above, the different behaviour of those systems, depending on which region they are – close to the limits of Tiƒ and Spe of the system (in a lower or upper border of the 5D level) or ‘across’ the system, which is where the metric of the fifth dimension remains constant.

To understand 5 Dimensional physics, and the scales of physical systems, we must first translate the metric of the 5th dimension in terms of physical constants and parameters of space-quanta, temporal frequency and ‘constant conserved present energy’:

Spe x Tiƒ = E ∆±i.

And its generator form of space-time systems:

GST: Spe< ST>tiƒ, to the jargon of physical systems and its larger, simpler supœrganisms.

*-Tiƒ: Smaller space-scales have faster time cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.*

*-Spe:Bigger wholes deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that co-exist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particle-being of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘body-waves’ of energy, and co-exist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.*

In most systems, the *metric law ∆*±i refers only to 3 planes that co-exist together, where the metric applies directly (biological systems at the cellular, individual and species scale ).

Yet physical systems are the largest of the ‘nested’ Russian dolls of the Universe. So the scales are enormous.

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. S, $pe), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, Tiƒ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

The 4 basic scales of mathematical physics, the galactic, ∆+1, gravitational light space-time scale, the thermodynamic, temperature, molecular, matter scale, ∆, the atomic and particle, ∆-1 scale and the dark world beyond galaxies, or cosmological scale, ∆+2, wrongly considered to follow the same laws that the ∆+1 galactic scale described by Einstein’s Relativity principles.

In the graph, we hint at a repetition of those scales, which in physical properties might be infinite as we find an astonishing symmetry between galaxies and atoms, which are unified mathematically with 5D metric (unification equation of forces: masses and charges).

Further on, when we look within those ‘large scales’, the quantum, thermal and gravitational world have sub-scales and forces that emerge into each other (the magnetic domains, which act in the 3 scales, the ¥-rays, whose frequencies carry energy and information across all) that structures the largest ‘whole’ fully understood, the galaxy, as a single supœrganism, over which we can ‘cast’ the different ‘stientific perspective’ of knowledge:

A simplex mathematical description, akin to that of the atom; a more complex biological analysis of its parts and cycles that make the galaxy (and by extension the atom) akin to a cell and finally a metaphysical disquisition about the informative, sentient and reproductive qualities of its centres (quarks and black holes). While we shall escape all together the more metaphysical question about the apperception of atoms and galaxies, the biological properties of both are unavoidable to make a proper description of it. And once we have understood the ‘ego paradox’, that makes humans reject vital properties to non-anthopomorphic beings, ignore the qualms of orthodoxy.

Physical experiments are concerned with those 3 planes of the physical Universe, (the particle and cosmic scales), to which Complexity and its T.Œ (Theory of the Organic Everything), ads its models within the organic paradigm that reveals information about its structure at a higher level than the minimalist description through locomotions and integrals of its worldlines.

*In this post we shall explore those 4 scales, which we define in detail in the 3rd line, plane by plane of the 5th dimension. Their main feature is the symmetry respect to the human mind-center of its two fundamental entities, ∆-1 charges and ∆+1 masses, at the level of atoms and galaxies. Thus we divide roughly the stience of astrophysics in ∆≥+1 astronomy and ∆≤o: physics.*

All beings of reality are indeed made of lineal entropic limbs/fields, the geometry that moves faster, and spherical particles/heads of information, the ‘volume that stores more form in lesser space’, joined by body-waves of hyperbolic energy, which combine and iterate both.

And this happens, because the universe of scales of space-time has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a body-wave of energy.

So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. *And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:*

Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.

And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

And we resume this with a simple equation, which is in science call the ‘metric equation’ of a dimension of space-time, in this case the 5th dimension of scalar, organic systems, which is the arrow of future of the Universe:

*5D metric*: Spe (spatial size) x Tiƒ (temporal clocks of information= ∆-constant

That is, the product of the speed of information and entropy of the system remains constant, so smaller and larger beings can co-exist together in present.

And we call this ‘constant of present’ Energy.

For example, a fly thinks 10 times faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can co-exist.

And of course it applies to physics, as masses are vortices of time information, which end its world cycle of existence in the explosive dimension of entropy and death in a cyclical, fractal Universe, in which big-bang means merely the E<=>Mc² death side of Einstein equation.

But *this equation runs the other way around creating mass, collapsing entropy into mass. In fact Einstein first wrote it as M=E/c², in a landmark paper, explaining how gravitation could create mass out of entropy, as those strangelets and black holes, do collapsing light mass into heavy mass particles, as galaxies do, collapsing vacuum space into gravitational mass.*

And true physics needs both arrows of time.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information.

**The 5th dimension of absolute future time: wholes come after parts.**

Thus, there is a MUCH MORE IMPORTANT CONCEPT OF TIME, IN 5DIMENSIONAL PHYSICS, related to the meaning of the Universal Constants of ‘Energy and Time’, of the 3 fundamental planes of the 5th dimension and its physical systems, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-Thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 cosmological scale, which will truly explain the equations and meanings of physics.

The lower scales of reality influence the larger ones, but energy and information does not transfer equally upwards (information moves easily but energy finds entropy) that downwards (motion synchronises perfectly but information does not go downwards – no Lamarckian evolution).

This duality is essential to understand how informative spins move upwards synchronising the motion of physical parts and how lineal energy moves downwards establishing the mechanical motions of Newtonian physics. And how parts and wholes become organic parts of physical systems.

Mathematical physics is in that sense only a part of all the properties of physical systems. Bio-logical properties are far more essential to synthesise the meaning of physical systems, the why and reasons of its ‘Maxwellian demons’ (-; all those points-particles, fractal points of view that gauge information, act-react to the environment and pursuit actions in space time that maximise its function of existence œ (±∆ e & i, ∑œ, ∫U).

In pure existential algebra, ¬Æ, we can deduce mathematically, departing from a logic function of existence, Œ, in which 5 different space-time actions delivered by each fractal point, in a given plane of the 5th dimension, traces a series of actions, which are ordered into world cycles, that represent a flow of vital space, enclosed into a series of seemingly permanent perpendicular time cycles that guide them.

Physical Existence is a holography of closed moving bidimensional functions of temporal information, To, surrounding expansive fields of entropy, vital spaces, Sæ, to iterate its formal, cyclical waves in a reproductive, organic game, which can be better expressed in darwinian biological ways. Atoms in that sense behave in no different orm from animal herds and territorial beasts, or human beings for that matter: they have a territory constrained by the boundaries of its field of force, in which an electronic body constantly captures photonic energy, which it transfers to the positive nucleus to ‘fence it off’, and avoid its absorption by the stronger nucleons, feeding them with electromagnetic energy and information.

Atoms and molecules are therefore organic species, which act in modes that can be described with the biological topology of space-time systems, and its actions respond to the ‘Universal mandate’ of all systems – to feed on energy and information, ±∆e, i, and iterate its cycles into an offspring of new particles and atomic systems, ∆œ, that will evolve socially into larger universal planes, ∑œ>∆+1.

So it could be possible to make a merely qualitative, biological why-explanation of atomic physics without any quantitative, mathematical description on the details of those actions of atoms, in which they exchange energy and information, iterate and evolve socially into news atoms, molecules and matter states.

The outcome of those interactions is predictable in mere ‘top predator’ terms, considering the ‘momentum’ product of the active magnitude ‘To-strength-density’ and its Sæ entropic speed-motion, p = Active magnitude x Speed, the top predator force of the system (as we consider the intelligence and body force of a biological beings its 2 parameters of top predator power). So for example, when a lower mass family enters in contact with a stronger mass, in a medium in which both are stable the larger mass eats the smaller one.

What is then a top predator in a given field of physics is the active magnitude of that field, which is able to extract energy and information of it (mass in a gravitational ∆+1 field, heat in the ∆-thermodynamic scale and charge in the ∆-1 scales) with maximal density of mass or charge or temperature; which is in relative motion or rather ‘acceleration’ (as motions are all relative and hence indistinguishable, but acceleration is a ‘plus dimension over steady motion’ which adds force to the active magnitude).

When a black hole collides with a star, given its larger momentum it feeds on it. Generally speaking the confrontation between two physical systems, as when two biological systems collide is defined by the To-maximal mass/informative intelligence of the system. We can in this manner tailored physics into a biological science. We will observe for example, that only those crystal configurations in which the centered mind-mirror point of view of the crystal can perceive information from al the relative spatial dimensions are allowed, or else the system will be ‘blind’ to external information.

So all crystal solids are regular forms. We can taylor particle physics to the world cycles of particles when considering antiparticles to be the death state, when the energy of the system ’emerges’ into a larger scale. So only particles that conjugate with the antiparticle, have a mass Dirac value, as their death emits its energy to the upper gravitational scale. And vice versa, we can consider the E=Mc2, explosion of mass into radiating energy and temperature of the lower time-space scales, as a process of death of matter.

T.Œ is able to explain both, the organic paradigm and behaviour of physical particles and atoms, its vital actions of ±∆e, i, energy and information absorption and emission, ∆œ, reproduction and social evolution into larger universals U, along its mathematical description enlightening mathematical physics with its whys.

Though this is not so easy beyond the simplest level of equations as mathematical physics has departed from reality in many spheres, with wrong definitions of dimensions time cycles and time clocks and the proper understanding of its parameters and Universal constants of space, action and energy-information flows between scales. So we shall just introduce the simplest equations, to elucidate the meaning of some key elements of particle physics, such as mass, charge, fields and the ternary descriptions of them.

We are fast introducing a picture of the enormous number of advances in all sciences, brought about by cyclical time and the understanding of the 5th dimension and its rather simple but powerful metrics to explain all what exists as travels in time through its arrows of cyclical time from birth to extinction and then the ARROW OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION FROM PARTS INTO WHOLES, OF SOCIAL LOVE OF SUPERORGANISMS, OF 5D.

For example, genetics codes time from the lower ∆-1 cellular scale to the upper organic scale, providing its social evolution through the informative arrow of future. But the larger whole does NOT code the lower scale as that is a flow of relative past motion.

However the larger future whole DOES move synchronically the past cells. And the past scale cannot send pure flows of past motion to the future (entropy arrow of thermodynamic). Recently we have found that in fact psychological time also obeys the same arrows.

We move first subconsciously in the past, and then we do think with the relative future brain and control motion. Time IS all and existence is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension from seminal seeds that accelerate in time (palingenetic evolution) and then slow down their clocks as they surface into the ∆+1 scale of time, and then live the slower times of the super organisms of nations and civilisations of history, to die fast back to cells, completing a world cycle…

Those are fast reviews of some classic themes of time in physics, biology, sociology and psychology – mental time, which conform the 4 fields of time-space sciences unified by the new metrics of 5D fractal, cyclical space-time. As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension.

In the graph, we have summarised all those scales and the 2 relative inverse arrows, which make a life-death cycle a ‘loop’ of time in 3 ages moving also upwards and downwards in the 5th dimension, origin of the ‘Generator Equation’ of 5D Fractal space-time, poised to become the most important equation of science in the XXI century, as it resumes its 3 elements, the motions up and down in scales of the 5th dimension, the 3 ages of time, dominated each one by the 3 parts of all organisms, which respond to the 3 only topologies of geometrical systems’ – the young energetic age dominated by lineal toroid fields/limbs of entropy of maximal speed between 2 points, the mature, reproductive age dominated by present hyperbolic body-waves and the future-informative age dominated by spherical particle/heads of maximal informative storage:

Γ. ∆-1: Spe (past-lineal, toroid limbs-fields) ≤≥∆: ExI (hyperbolic-planar body-waves) ≤≥ ∆+1 (spherical future particles-heads)

Whereas we introduce some basic symbols of 5D Metrics, ∆ for the 5h dimension with an index for its planes, Γ, the G-enerator equation, which can be studied for each system in detail and for each part in new ternary fractal divisions, <, the arrow of expansive entropy, > the arrow of future information and ≈ =, the arrow of present balance, ExI, the energy and information mixture of Sæ: spatial entropy and O-cyclical, temporal clocks with maximal form which body-waves mix in present states.

So the next step of evolution of mathematical physics is to connect this modern description of Sæ-fields, ST-waves & To-particles, with the ternary structure, Sæ> STi>To systems that move over entropic, Sæ fields, reproduce through wave motions and gauge information with its particles, creating a social organism of 3 simultaneous spatial parts, with internal clocks synchronised to the external world.

To that aim we shall repeat the fact that each scale has its own ‘constants of space actions’ and time clocks, which suffer clear changes of structure as formal motions transfer ‘as energy’ through 3 scales.

Thus, there are 3 Constants of space-time in each scale:

∆-1: H-planck constant: Energy = H x ƒ;whereas H is the constant of action and ƒ the measure of frequency, the internal clock of time of quantum systems.

∆: k-Boltzmann Constant: Energy = 2/3k x T, whereas k is the constant of action of thermodynamic systems and T, temperature, the measure of molecular vibrations, the internal clock of molecular systems.

∆+1: c-Light Space Constant: E = cc x M, whereas c² is the constant of action of the Gravitational scale and M, Mass, the cyclical vortex of time, the clock of Gravitational systems.

How energy and time transfer between scales, how a clock of time disappears in one scale, so Standard Model particles do not have mass, and then its frequency clocks transfer time in the form of radiation to the thermodynamic scale, and then Black holes of the gravitational scale don’t have temperature… questions that physicists have not even answered because using lineal time, as Pauli once said of a paper, ‘they are no even wrong’… and will open up an entire new world of relationships and meanings to each and all sciences.

As both arrows can happen between entropic limbs-fields and waves, which move informative heads-particles and each part can be divided in new ternary parts (so for example your informative nervous system divides into a lineal spinal chord that controls the energetic body and limbs, your brain with a hyperbolic grey matter and your smaller eye, the focus of your information, making you an I=Eye (max. Information; To) < Wor(l)d=ExI verbal brain: i think therefore I exist: max. balance, the site of your will and finally the spinal reflex past system of control of your external motions – that obsessive part of a system of timespace physicists study so well, but so simple when you know the whole depth of timespace (-;

Thus on the frontier between those worlds ‘time halts’ to a zero and explodes in the new scale at maximal speed.

From the frequency of radiation we move into the temperature of solid bodies, shrinking by a fourth power the total energy, which emerges as temperature from high frequency-temperatures which slow down as we grow in mass, and finally reach zero temperature in the densest mass fields, black holes, where also time dilation makes time zero. So the clocks of time of each scale have a curous similar behaviour, with a lineal region of similar speed and sudden accelerations of frequency and temperature inverse to the future arrow o f growing size and diminishing time speeds.

Those time zero transitions when a system dies and its energy transfers to a larger top predator membrane, or whole, which must always be considered a top predator of smaller zero points, means that at this stage, the being becomes a sow part of the shoe in which it dies and transfers its energy an information So for example masses die as anti masses, particles and antiparticles conjugate their imaginary and real antiparticle particle system into a mass moment, in the dirac equation. So only particles tha die as antiparticles acquire mass, meaning transfer its mass in the point zero of death its energy to the upper scale of mass membranes.**.**

Those 3 metric equations of the 3 scales of physical systems are co-invariant to relative changes of energy and information, and this is the ultimate meaning of the H, K, C constants of action of the 3 scales. They remain invariant for each quanta of action, as if we increase the energy of the action we have to diminish the time frequency or duration of it, to maintain 5D metrics invariant: H = E x T.

**How to describe formally the parameters of space and time of a system. Speed, density and existence.**

Now the first question to answer is what are the parameters we use to study the vital space and cyclical time of a being. The answer is not immediate, because of the degree of detail, of the qualitative vs. quantitative description of the multiple ∆-scales in which an organism exists, etc. etc.

We thus shall talk of a ‘Function of Existence’ , which would be the function of space and time of a being. Such function of existence can be described in many ways. And as we go deeper into the understanding of the structure of a system, we shall see new ‘properties’ of those vital space and times.

Yet at first sight from a purely physical perspective

*And the equation we search for, is a fractal generator, simple equation that relates space and time, and hence is the origin of all systems – the inverse properties of space and time, which however seek for a balance, in its complementary systems, which bring 2 contradictory tendencies:*

TO/se=Constant of density SE x to = Constant of speed

Which are the 2 compound fundamental parameters/magnitudes to measure the Informative and Spatial ‘existential momentum’ of a system, and as such are defined in all of them.

We call those relationships, or any other system of equations that define the vital space and cyclical time of a system, the function of existence of the space-time being.

And it is the departure equation for all systems.

Indeed, what we call density it is related to the informative density of numbers, points of view, quanta, active magnitude, that is, the number of equal U_{∆-1} elements of the system per unit of volume, which measures the force of the system compared to any other entity moving in the ∆ Plane of Space-time.

While speed, measure in terms of quanta of space (wavelengths) and Steps of the System (Limbs/field steps) or frequency, v, measures essentially the speed at which such Tƒ/Sp= ST displaces itself or its åctions/waves of energy and information across the U∆ plane.

Consider the case of the U±3 light space-time Universe in which we humans mostly exist. Here the constant of speed is the light constant and it is easy to relate its Universal Equation, Sp x Tƒ with the Maxwell equation of the speed of light. But what is the constant of density of that Universal/Galactic reality? It depends on what kind of ‘Œ’ points co-existing in that Universe we talk of.

If our ‘phase space’ is that of life brains, for example, this constant refers to the density of neurons and its total counting in a living being, and so the active magnitude Œ will be number of neurons.

If our ‘phase space’ is gravitational space, the active magnitude is mass and the constant of density classifies perfectly almost all physical systems from gas to solid and ultra solid boson states of quark stars.

Thus the constant of speed we use here refers to an external motion and the constant of density to the internal space.

What is though the constant of speed of the internal being and the constant of density of the light-space Universe? The second is a key question of cosmology that we shall treat and correct in its specific posts. The first one, again is worth to study in more detail.

Human constant of speed is NOT the speed of light, obviously, but the mean clock of our systems, which happens to be a second, the thought beat, the heart beat and the eye beat. Thus all the key systems of the human being tick to the same clock, which happens to be the clock of the Universe, from the human point of view.

We thus talk of a Uo, that is the human clock of reference, as the center of the inertial frame of references humans use to acquire knowledge with their mind.

From this Uo, however spaces of larger/smaller size and times of faster/slower clocks do exist.

And so we have to define the system at least through U±1 Universal planes, the cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, gravitational/social Planes of existence (biological/physical jargons).

And so the density of the ‘Active Œ’ and its capacity to move and reproduce and interact in its plane of existence, become 2 initial variables, which express mathematically the ‘purpose of existence’, to move, absorb and emit energy and information, and reproduce your form, organizing yourself into bigger Tƒ∆+1.

*And this is due to the 3 ^{rd} fundamental characteristic of the Universe: to be made of smaller parts that organize themselves into bigger wholes, that is to be part of a scalar reality of multiple space-time fields of different size in its quanta of energy and bits of information.*

So mathematical physics, defined by topological analysis, logic time, defined by cyclical logic, scalar 5D , defined by organic, biological laws, which will also become the blueprint for a new understanding of history, the human superorganism and industrial economics, the superorganism of machines, and existential algebra, the philosophical, pantheist analysis of reality.** **

** ****5D metrics and space-time dualities.**

A ‘metric dimension’ is according to Geometry (Klein), a space-time region where there is co-invariant system that makes possible motions and translations, we can define the 5th dimension of space-time as the dimension of relative sizes in space and relative speed of time-clocks, whose product remains invariant, as paradoxically smaller systems tic faster than larger ones, but its product remains invariant.

This simple law of all time vortices, with different equations according to the dimensions of the time-clock (V x R=k), being the simplest one-sphere=disk equation, for one-dimensional vortices)will turn out to be the most important metric law of the Universe, grossly underrated in physical studies.

Since such invariance creates a stable ‘metric geometry’ that defines a new dimension of space-time, which solves all kind of fundamental questions about reality, from:

– The unification of charges and masses (2 vortices of space-time of two different membranes, the quantum nanoscopic and galactic macroscopic ones, in which paradoxically the faster clocks of charges make its electromagnetic force more attractive), studied in this post.

– To the explanation of Relativity contraction of length and dilation of Time, as both elements do vary, but the product of both, (To x g) x (Lo/g) = T x L = K, remains constant.

– To the explanation of the big-bang Inflation process, as Min. To x Max. Se = K, meaning that as we diminish the time cycle, paradoxically the energy content increases.

– to the explanation of the 3 main ‘clocks of time’ of the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, also expressions of the same metrics: E = H x V(t), the Planck constant of action of the quantum plane, ∆-1, E = K x T(t), the Boltzmann constant of action of the thermodynamic plane, ∆, our plane of human existence regulated by temperature clocks, E= m c^{2} , the constant of action of the larger gravitational plane, ∆+1.

Those are some immediate consequences of 5D metrics in the understanding of the meaning of the different clocks, actions and relative speeds of time and size of the physical Universe along its scales.

But what makes T.Œ so truth is its superiority according to the laws of the scientific method – that is, the simplicity of its foundations, (Ockham’s principle) coupled with its capacity to explain the widest range of phenomena of any Theory of Everything (Organic) – that is, its correspondence will all the theories of all sciences, as the general article on T.Œ that I advice to read first proves.

Now with those very basic elements, we can easily explain physical systems, as all will have 3 parts in space, 3 ages in life and co-exist in 3 scales of reality. And so ALL physical systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, which for physical systems are the quantum, ∆-1, Thermodynamic ∆-scale and gravitational, cosmic scale, ∆+1.

Because of the nature of this blog, we shall concentrate only on 2 of those scales, in two different posts. This post dedicated to the cosmic scale will study its fundamental organism galaxies, with the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension. The post on particles will study the quantum scale, and its fundamental organism, the atom with the same metrics.

We said we depart from a simple equation, Ce= Sæ x To: The constant energy of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension is the product of its spatial entropy and cyclical information. This simple truth however allows for an enormous number of combination of motions and forms, and so we must consider how many motions and forms can exist in each plane of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is made easy when we consider an isolated plane, which will have obviously 1 dimension less than the sum of all planes, hence it will be a 4DimensionalUniverse, and thus connect directly with the different physical sciences that study them, quantum physics in the lower scale, thermodynamics in the idle scale and Relativity in the larger scale.

But then we do have to define the regions in which one scale ‘emerges’ into the next scale and vice versa, one scale ‘dissolves’ into the lower scale. As those regions are special, suffering steep transformation, which are not similar to the ‘steady state’, middle region of the system, where laws are fairly constant. So when we go to the limits of temperature (ultra cold and plasma physics), things do become apparently weird to the observer.

When we go to the limits of quantum physics (Planck scale, larger matter clumps) again the laws of quantum physics become irrelevant, and when we go to the limits of the gravitational scale (c-speed, black holes), we observe also that the laws of ‘Newtonian Gravitation’ become deformed. So roughly speaking we can talk of 2 regions, for each plane of the 5^{th} dimension, as we move from the bottom to the top of its pyramids: a Lorentzian region of steep changes in the Sæ and To, entropy ad information systems of the being that travels through it – remember a dimension is defined by a co-invariant equation.

Now latter we shall consider many of these proper interpretations, and the paradoxes of classic physics regarding the cosmological constant due to their null understanding of the dualities of space-time and how to properly interpret it, but the example suffices in this 2nd line to fully grasp what is a Physical equation of a field: a ternary Spatial description of a symmetry of space-time.

This field though is the field of Gravitation, of which contrary to belief we ONLY know to be fully operative in the Galaxy in the scale in which we have reliable measures NOT in the cosmos, and that will be latter discussed in detail.

Indeed, there might be above it, between galaxies – and I believe that should be the case according to the growing planes of the 5th dimension, a Bigger field, which therefore has faster than c-light space-time and denser rotational vortices of time of < 0 temperature of informative order, made of top quark stars (aka black holes) and Higgs fields of tachyon, scalar distance-speed, cause of the inflaton phase of expansive big-bangs, and the breaking of symmetry (death and reabsorption) of our galactic Universe. And we will return to it, being so important both for theoretical and practical reasons today (as we are exploring those particles that devour our matter and make it matter of the dark energy/matter world outside galaxies, today on earth hence the dangers they might devour us)

Now this is therefore the Generator equation of the ∆+2 cosmological realm of solar systems, both in its space-time integrating present field equation and its past to future, individual equation.

The intelligent reader will then realize that the same description happen for smaller scales of reality, of which we will bring here the 3 more important, the scale of electric currents, the scale of thermodynamic fields and the scale of quantum fields, and merely enunciate its equations:

– In the ∆ electromagnetic plane of existence, the field-wave equations are the Maxwell equations, and the ‘Geodesic equation’ is the Lorentz equation (whereas we consider the electron social group as the fundamental element of study).

Maxwell and Lorentz equations for the wave-field of electromagnetism are equivalent to the equations of Einstein written by Heaviside, called Gravito-magnetic equations with its translation of jargon from gravity to electromagnetism. They ARE the same equations differing basically in the ‘constant’ of curvature of space-time, G and Q, which belong to two planes of size of the Universe, the cosmic and microcosmic planes.

Now the scales are not exactly equal as no fractal is equal in all scales: you are not like your cells, but the astounding parallelism shows that conceptually the Universe IS a fractal of 5D planes. The only difference between those two constants will BE one of strength, due to the fact that according to 5D metrics, paradoxically smaller sales ARE stronger, faster in its time clocks: Sæ x To = L. Below we see also the geodesics of both fields – the motion of particles on it.

The forest thus is clear, the details have been there for a century.

– In the ∆ thermodynamic equations of molecular atoms (where we consider the atom as the fundamental field of study), the Field-wave equation is the Heat equation (Gibbs equation of Free energy: G=H-ST, once more with 3 components) or equation of present, and the Geodesic equation of motion of a particle are Boltzmann equations for ideal gases, of the motion of individual particles, which gave birth to the understanding of the laws of thermodynamics.

– In the ∆-2 scale of quantum physics the Dirac equation becomes the present-wave equation (and the Schrodinger simpler version) which are in essence Hamiltonians of energy, that describe all its elements, and the geodesic equation are the Feynman formalism of motions and diagrams that express how particles move along paths exchanging energy and information with other particles.

And again for any physicist who wants to think on 5D terms, it should be evident that the thermodynamic and quantum scale USE THE SAME MATHEMATICAL FORMALISMS, statistical probabilities, to account for the massive amounts of particles with multiple degrees of freedom, and ‘canonical ensembles’, that study their motions in group, and aleatory paths in which particles stop and go, collide, exchange energy and keep moving and stopping (Brownian paths, Feynman paths), since we are describing basically two scales of motions which are telling us similar stories, a series of particles or molecules which are free to move around and perform actions of storage of energy and information, regulated by simple terms.

** T****HE PHYSICAL PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION.**

The scales of the 5th dimension are more evident in physics that in any other science as we do not limit our inquire as in biology and sociology to an ∆±1 single super organism and its 3 scales (cells, organisms, ecosystems; individuals, nations, human species). So the fact that physicists have not been able to clarify its concepts of time, space, wave, particle, field, energy, information etc. beyond its mathematics of continuous space-time makes the whole field a bit confusing. Anthropomorphism and the incapacity to understand the distortions of observers and observables also provokes problems of interpretation.

Difficulty then arises from the fact that Astrophysics is a ‘mathematical-only’ theory with special emphasis in a single space-time continuum analysis of the cosmos and a human, abstract point of view implicit in Relativity, where the electronic=human eye rod of space-time measure, light is considered NOT only what it is, the rod of measure of the space-time of this galaxy, but of the entire Universe.

Again we shall always find the same problem with ‘humans’, to convert his ‘mind point of view’ into a Universal mind point of view, without being aware of the limits of mind-information embedded in the equation of any monadic mind:

O-point (infinitesimal) x ∞ Universe of time-space moving cycles = Still reduced linguistic mapping

Which the O-point of view confuses with the absolute Universe. Consider this image, the first ‘scientist’ mapping of the Universe. At the time nebulae were considered stars, so the Milky way was all the UNIVERSE. And of course, the sun was in its center:

Now, science is objective and so the proper definition is that of Schopenhauer: ‘man is a mush covering a lost rock in a corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about us’.

Now this is what we so far can see and talk around us:

It is not even worthy to try to point out the sun in the network of ‘galaxies’ of that piece of cosmos, whose 13 billion horizon is as far as light comes to us… 5D physics would say that the ∆4, cosmic scale of 1011 galaxies, form a new ∆-scale (∆5), curiously enough with the same 1011 constant of order between ∆-planes of the 5th dimension. So this is all we know-know. There is an ∆4 scale we perceive which MIGHT BE a relative, cell or atom or quanta of the larger whole (perspective of the ∆n>4 scale).

And depending what it ‘is’, it might have been born in one or other way. In the same image we see that the Universe might be modeled as an organism of network cells, as the galaxy can be modeled ‘best’ as a cell, with DNA-black holes in its center, where stars can be modeled as Neutrons that die in an inverse beta-decay called ‘supernovae’ producing a mass of ‘neutrino’ energy, which curiously takes away the same proportion of matter than neutrinos take from neutron-beta decay.

This is the MOST likely relative fractal symmetry on the 5th dimension, which is NOT identical but as all fractals self-similar. Now in this organic vision we can FIT astrophysics and mathematics, as we can fit mathematics in BIOLOGY, but as we do NOT start explaining the organism of the cell WITH MATHEMATICS only, as we are more interested into an analytic, synthetic view, 5D physics, does NOT START with equations. It puts them, as Biologists do, when it seems fit to do so. Or when we are interested in details or want to quantify data.

This is needed BECAUSE OF the uncertainty of studying a Universe of which we only perceive a 4%, due to the uncertainty of its vast size and distance from our point of view in terms of scales of the 5th dimension so this implies:

1) The difficulty on translating the exact mathematical, spatial equations of astrophysics into meaningful statements UNLESS we use homology between 5D scales we know better and laws and functions of Organic and temporal, causal nature.

2) And so we shall do this despite the natural opposition to an organic interpretation of the Universe by the present practitioners of the abstract, mathematical paradigm.

On the other hand 5D physics surprisingly enough give new insights in both the cosmic big-bang, General Relativity, and by applying the isomorphic laws of all scales of reality, on the likely nature of dark matter and dark energy which can guide future researchers on the field as long as they accept the broader perspective of a Theory of the Organic Everything (TŒ).

Now we cannot make it easier for the ‘dogma’ of mechanist science as T.Œ implies a change of paradigm and so we will continue the method of other posts.

This means the description of the ‘organic, multi-linguistic’ Universe, will be ‘upside down’ with respect to the analytic method of starting from the study of the minuscule mathematical parts of the Universe, its space-quanta, to build up the structures of the universal organism with a mere abstract mathematical description, which ignores completely the relationship of its organic parts in space, the sequential ages of its worldcycles of conception, birth and extinction and its relative ‘isomorphic’ scales of the 5th dimension, in which similar phenomena take place (big bang scales from the atom to the cosmos).

Instead as usual we will describe first the whole, as an interrelated Organism with 10 ‘dimensional parameters’, hence starting by:

– Defining its Fractal Generator, G, with its ternary symmetries in space, time and its fractal scales and ternary sub-systems for each scale.

– Then study the main species of the 3 co-existing planes of astrophysical systems – which in cosmology are its ∆-1 star systems, its ∆-galaxies and the ∆+1 Universe.

– And as it is quite relevant in the case of physical systems that co-exist in an isomorphic, isotropic background consider the Fractal principle, subdividing them into its 3 sub-systems at atomic level.

– Then we study its organic structure in space with its 3 canonical topologies (Sæ-energetic membrane, ExI, cyclical body-wave and To-informative particle-head), which are often similar in the 3 scales, its 3 ages in time.

– And finally focus on the central 0-points of those systems, which are the commanding black holes that control the galaxy and its cyclical space-time actions.

This is the bare bone elements of astrophysical systems, whose qualitative study we can complete with quantitative analysis of the relationships between its 10 components and 5 actions (3 scales, 3 ages, 3 organs, and 0-points’ actions), as well as its variations of species and Universal constants (ratios and social numbers between those 10 elements and 5 actions).

Thus when study those elements, we can get to any degree of detail we want, using the known ‘space-time dualities and paradoxes’, ternary symmetries of time ages and space organs, decametric social scales between ∆±1 planes, and Universal constants of actions.

Further on we can apply the ternary fractal principle, which makes possible to study any part as a whole and divide it into 3 sub-parts, 3 sub-ages, 3 sub-planes.

And spend hundreds of pages analyzing the mathematical physics involved in the analytic description of those elements.

If I were in my prime and T.Œ had at its disposal the team of top astrophysical researchers it deserves, it would be easy to write a 1000 pages masterpiece that would r=evolve the discipline as nothing it has done since the Golden Age of relativity half a century ago. Others are welcome to do it.

Since T.Œ and the 5Dimentional organic space-time structure of reality and its cyclical, fractal laws can fully describe all what exists in the cosmos, discerning also what is likely NOT to be.

But in this introductory post and present condition of health I cannot deliver that much. We thus have to chose some themes of cosmology of interest for bringing solutions and clarifying classic themes of abstract astrophysics with the new perspective of the organic paradigm.

We thus will study the following themes.

__Γ____. The generator:__

We will just enunciate the generator equation and its main sub-equations. And apply the Fractal Ternary Principle including some elements of the atomic, particle scale, clarifying:

The connection of the 3 planes of cosmology (stars, Galaxies and Cosmos) with the 3 planes of physics (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales)

Regarding the 3 Planes of Existence of physics, ∆-1: atoms, ∆-thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 cosmic plane we will study a them in some detail:

– The Unification equation between charges, the micro-vortices of time of the atomic scale and masses, the main time vortex of the 3 cosmological scales. Since it is a long seek solution impossible to obtain in a single plane of space-time, as charges and masses, electromagnetism and gravitation belong to two different scales of the 5th dimension. We will do the simplest mathematical unification and consider the themes of more complex unifications using Einstein’s EFE and Maxwell equations and other mathematical variations.

__The 3 planes of cosmology.__

Regarding the 3 planes of cosmology, the ∆-1: star plane, the ∆-galactic plane and the ∆+1 cosmological plane we will study their ‘deaths’ and creations, that is, the different big-bangs happening on the 3 scales: Novae for ∆-1 stars, quasars for ∆-galaxies and big-bang proper for the ∆+1 cosmos. The theme of analysis here will be to evaluate the data of the cosmic big bang and consider to which of the two largest big bangs of entropy correspond (galactic quasars or local universe).

__The borders between planes.__

We introduce here the borders of information (0 temperature) and space (c-speed) between the galactic plane of light space and the cosmic plane of dark energy and dark matter.

__The 3 ages of time.__

We will briefly consider the 3 ages of time of stars, which follow the canonical laws of T.Œ and the co-invariance of space and time, represented by the H-R diagram, the 3 ages of the cosmos, represented by the 3 main solutions to Einstein’s equations and the 3 ±∆ ages of the galaxy, in more detail.

__The 3 forms of space. __We will focus on the 3 forms of a galaxy, and its symmetry with the 3 families of masses on the atomic scale, to show the symmetries of scales.

We will conclude with some remarks on the infinite scales of astrophysical systems.

The next post will deal with the atom and its lower particle, quantum scales and molecular, thermodynamic scale and there we will consider more general themes of physics, with a more detailed account of the 10 isomorphisms of physical systems. And then we will deal with some themes of geology

My apologies for the bad format of those posts, its bad English and repetitions. This is an effort to make T.Œ available to future researchers, trying to order 20 years of research in the face of some health problems that limit my capacity to work in as the mood and illness changes. My only promise to the world of science is to lay down enough material by the end of 2016 for people truly interested in a Theory of Everything based in the organic, systemic paradigm, to explore all the sciences of mankind, arts and religions with the same isomorphic laws of 5D fractal space-time cycles.

Thus the easily clarified concepts of an organic Universe vs. an abstract reductionist description of it, which confronts classic Astrophysics and 5D T.Œ, is something we won’t avoid.

The reader should also understand that the organic paradigm is closer to Eastern philosophies and cultures as what he calls science is today part of the western tradition, and even if he is not aware of it, many of its ‘dogmas’ and ‘postulates’ have embedded still anthropomorphic, subjective elements of the western culture and its 3 fundamental bias – a lineal conception of time, dating back to the military, worldly profession of physicists and Abrahamic Religions, from where also a subjective view of man as the center of the Universe springs – today substituted by the dogma that we are the only sentient, intelligent, perceptive, vital species (along some animals which are being adopted of lately, as ‘closer to us’). And so he will find himself at odds with the concepts underling T.Œ, a ‘Theory of the Organic Everything’, when we deal with the organic structure of galaxies and its ages of life and the like.

So far so good, including of course the Ego paradox of all finitesimal minds that see its reality from its point of view, one frame of reference more of the infinite ones in existence. And so after that fast analysis of the superorganism of the galaxy we can now tackle many of the abstract, mathematical astrophysical ‘theories’ of astrophysicists, none of them concerned unfortunately with the true synthetic nature of the galaxy and its scales. Now of course if we were in the XXII century, none of what I am going to write about would make any sense of be of any sensible interest to future T.Œ students of the galactic superorganism, but as we are still in the dark ages, we must talk of all those idols of the tribe, Einstein, the big-bang, black holes (frozen top stars), Unification equations, etc.

**Sub-scales.**

There are obviously then as in the ‘limit’ of the ∆+1 scale (c,, v duality) sub-scales of physics according to the ∆§, 10¹º scalar growth, which we will study latter.

**THE ORGANIC GALAXY**

‘We are just a rock in a corner of the Universe, departing from this fact we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer

So how it would be the organic galaxy as a model of the Universe? Let us deal with it.

Now we have the ‘theoretical minimum’ to explain what a galaxy, in which we are host as a lost rock in a mitochondria corner truly is as a system of ternary space-time. And so we can complete even before we show you the ternary structure of maths, the ternary structure of the Universe.

ONE of the first papers of Witten, father of modern string theory, was about strangelets. Since he had been for 20 years ‘soundly’ explaining that the only known-known halo candidate to be 90% of dark heavy matter are quark matter, strangelets, the most stable matter of the Universe. Since the so-called ‘Witten hypothesis’ obeys both, the ‘principle of economicity and simplicity – Ockham’s razor – as strangelets are made of ‘heavy quarks’ we know do exist, and Nature does NOT create a new species of top predator mass, out of the blues. Hence strangelets MUST EXIST, be more common than the weak Ud-mass we are made of and have a REAL use on the Universe.

Further on, today we know that the galaxy is filled with planets, shown to be overwhelmingly the most numerous objects of the perceived galaxy. And since stars reproduce black holes, which are at the center of its galaxies, similar to a cell, with its gravitational dense informative centres of black hole, its energetic planets and stars in between, made of our light ud-quarks, the symmetries of Nature between microcosmos and macrocosmos, *preclude that the 3rd known-known type of quarks, should be the substance of that halo made hence of strangelets that feed on planets (while the super-heavy top quarks should be having similar density, the substance of black holes).*

* *This ternary symmetry, which follows the laws of simplicity and economicity in science, if anything have been further proved by THE LHC, which keeps ELIMINATING all other theoretical only ‘inventions’ of physicists tinkering with equations (so not Supersymmetry, not axions, NOT NOTHING except what we know is there and suffice to construct the ‘simple not malicious’ Universe (Einstein) since ‘simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), and Ockham’s razor work’:

*In the graph, the ternary symmetry between the microscopic and macroscopic scale of matter, which prompted Witten’s Hypothesis, is routinely explored in professional papers, and this scientist has used to model galaxies as an organism of 3 ‘topological parts’ similar to all systems of nature, made of a hard membrane that separates the ‘entity’, in this case the galaxy halo, similar to the protein membrane of a cell, or the electronic cover of an atom; a central, informative singularity, in the galaxy the swarm of black holes, in the cell of DNA genes, in the atom of quarks, and the lighter, ‘food’-energy that feeds both, in the galaxy our light ud-atoms, of stars and planets that seem to reproduce black holes and the Halo of strangelets, in the cell the energetic mitochondria that reproduces both proteins and DNA, and in the atom the ‘interatomic space’ filled with **energetic waves that move back and forth between quarks and electrons. It is the most beautiful symmetry of physics between both scales, proved by Ockham’s razor, economicity, experimental evidence and now unfortunately the Fermi paradox.*

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. And we are its food. It might be that humans are only ‘animals that make machines and weapons till they destroy themselves’? As Einstein put it: ‘it is obvious that our technology has overcome our humanity’.

Close your eyes. Think, do not see, the astounding beauty of the simple, fractal Universe. Feel communion with the whole, as your nothing, but dust of space-time in between the proton-top-quark-star-black hole in the center and the electron-strangelet negative halo.

So turning around the ego-trips of humanity and its physicists and religious people, the more sound objective, experimentally proved theory of reality would be exactly the inverse of the anthropic principle physicists sponsor (a Universe created with the constants that would give birth to man, supreme intelligent being): we are NOT the center of the Universe, dense dark matter is; the galaxy is NOT created for us, but we ARE the food of dark matter, and all galaxies END UP as pure vortex of mass, collapsing into the black hole, surrounded by a forbidding halo of strangelets, which prevent us to escape.

The structure of the galaxy as an anti-matter particle by virtue of the inversion of scales and the experimental facts (the halo has most of its mass, so it is much heavier than the center, and must be regarded as the ‘proton’ pole, while the center with less mass must be regarded as the ‘electron’ part.

Now to be clear enough, the galaxy is not an atom, nor an antiproton but another variety which hints as the inversion of the laws between galaxies in the ∆+1 little understood cosmological scale. By this we mean, the inverted properties of the halo and the galaxy, where the halo is far more massive, defy the natural concept of mass as ‘moving inwards’ towards the center. So the mass concept must be seen as ‘charge’ of the upper scale, defining the electron as ‘more charged’ than the black hole proton and we shall explore those themes in the fourth line.

**The ∆±1 limits of the Universal supœrganism: Unification equation.**

Where are the known-known limits of the Universal supœrganism, where the 5D metric equation works? The answer is *according to the properties of suœrganisms, where we find a self-similar structure, whose constants of spe/tiƒ are equivalent in 5D metric, which turn out to be the galaxy and the atom, and so we can unify them, with 5D metric.*

As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10ˆ30 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10ˆ-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ˆ-11 kgˆ-1 mˆ3 rad. secˆ-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10ˆ16 rad. secˆ -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10ˆ-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10ˆ -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10ˆ39 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Of course, this result is obtained using the underlying concepts of Newton->Poisson (gradient of gravitational potential), refined in Einstein’s ‘simultaneous pictures’ of those vortices, to study its relative curvature, which is the static view of an informative clock of time. So we can observe the similarities of all those concepts: curvature, speed of time, relative fractal scale, vortex attraction & universal constant as a ratio between the ‘curvature=speed in time’ and ‘size-distance’ in space of the system.

What matters to us here is this, the galaxy is organically like a cell, mathematically like an atom, with a positive center, which means a black hole is a top quark star, as top quarks are positive and are the exact size to become ultradense black holes in large numbers, and the electron-like halo is made of strangelets because strangelets are negative, and so they are the electron-like membrane of the halo, and what we are, homunculus?

So we can close as it is customary in any cyclical time-space analysis up and down the scales of 5D left or right in the negative, imaginary and positive numbers, of quanta of entropy, frequencies of information or space-time energies, two simple graphs that explain it all what remains to say of mathematical physics. On the left side you can see alas, the hydrogen electron with its two electromagnetic lobes, as those we saw in the galaxy-atom and the supposed big-bang.

All scales are the same, the fractal Universe is ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE, not only in motions in space (Galileo, Einstein) but in scales of size (Nottale) and topological forms. I just took this self-evident truth for anyone who is NOT an homunculus ego to its final consequences, with the metric equations of the 5th dimension.

**The known scales.**

As it seems infinite in space and time, duration… We wonder. It is infinite in 5D scales?

When we consider the ‘nested’ levels of the Universe, we are always limited according to epistemology by the limits of our perception from the ∆o, human point of view. If we use an objective, past to future, infinitesimal to infinity arrow of time to classy those scales no longer from a human p.o.v. we do come to the surprising result that the scale of the Atom and the scale of the Galaxy have the same equation in the metrics of the 5th dimension.

Thus the limits of our perception of reality are not only those two equal distances in absolute terms from ∆o (atom and galaxy) but are perceiving those 2 limiting scales as isomorphic. So this is the Universe we know: one with two isomorphic limits that conform the ‘atom-galaxy’.

**The immortal, Organic Universe. Upgrading astrophysics.**

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact* published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.*

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

**We** live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, *as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.*

*Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.*

And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero.

**The question of fractal self-similar scales.**

An even deeper view of the big-bang *is *the analysis, given the fact that the Universe is a fractal of infinite scales, of which one is the scale in which our observations of a background radiation, possible remnant of a cosmic explosion take place – a question by no means settled, but considered so given the ‘hidden behaviour of humans of ANY discipline, science, art or religion, where the Einstein paradox – its infinite arrogance, soon explained in scientific terms with the definition of the equation of the mind – also plays its role, with the scientist (in an even more difficult case as scientists claim always to be reasonable, experimentally sound and yet KEEP committing the same ‘cosmic censorship’ of data and faulty reason, whenever it collides with their ‘job’).

In the graph we show the 2 essential problems of modern astrophysics – first its lack of a complex understanding of the scales of the Universe, *all of which show similar ‘big-bangs’ of entropic matter, from left to right, the BG radiation, the galaxy, a nova big-bang of a star an a Hydrogen atom born of the beta decay big bang of a neutron. It is this awesome topological isomorphism of the three arrows of timespace what truly gives unity to all the beings of all the scales of the Universe. *

*A second* more puzzling problem of the modern digital age, in which causality and epistemology is loosing ground, is the increasing denial of experimental evidence, substituted by mathematical, computer models, which seem real, *whenever experimental facts defy dogmas of past-models, with a short of censorship, all too evident in the case of the cosmic big-bang, which has been falsified, but still is dogma, given the prestige it concedes to astrophysicists.*

Indeed, the cosmic big-bang dogma maintains the pretension of physicists of being the ‘high popes’ of science (instead of philosophy of science or religion) and so with the concept of an entropy only universe, which justifies the military culture that originated it, is *unassailable to reason*.

Yet, the background radiation that supposedly proves the Universal big-bang IS a local measure. So it only applies only to the galaxy, likely originated in a quasar big-bang in the last cycle of life and death of its central barred black hole. The issue in fact resolved a few years ago when we found the final proof of the local nature of the BG radiation: in the centre, we see a recent picture of our galaxy with two electromagnetic bubbles above an below the saggitarius black hole, which are exactly the same observed in the BG radiation that astrophysicists thought to be originated 13 billion years light away, at the birth of the cosmos (: So they were using them trying to measure if its light after 13 billion years travelling from the cosmic big-bang suffered delays depending on frequency. Well it turnED out they are just above and below Saggitarius 🙂

IT IS THEN obvious that the Universe is an immortal fractal of galaxies imploding vacuum space into gravitational informative vortices of mass, and exploding mass into dark entropy, likely emitted at superluminal speeds through the axis of its central black holes and during its final entropic death as quasars

But and this is what matters to us to understand ourselves and the future, man does NOT exist in the dark entropic or gaseous states of matter, but in the liquid and solid states of the galaxy and the surface of the earth, which are dedicated to reproduce NOT to extinguish information.

So we affirm that the local Universe is a fractal of three arrows of time, simple, relative past lineal, expansive, disordered entropic motions, its inverse, arrow of complex, cyclical, informative clock-like cycles, and its dominant, present, repetitive energetic combinations.

And its purpose is not death but life, the constant, fractal reproduction of systems, which communicate information with different languages with the purpose of building more complex social organisms.

And this is crystal clear in the universe at large, which appears as a clear network of organic galaxies evolved since a hypothesized fast big-bang death of a previous network universe in a quantum of time during eons of life evolution into complex social super organisms, from forces into virtual particles, atoms, molecules , states of matter, cells, organisms, planetary super organisms, and networks of stars ruled by the gravitational information of its DNA-like informative black holes that catalyze its evolution and reproduction.

So we can model all those scales of matter that matter to us, as a series of nested Russian dolls, each a super organism made of smaller super organisms, whose purpose is always to reproduce its information faster than any rival species, to survive in the struggle for existence, as Darwin explained us.

It is then when the second fundamental law of balance besides the balance of the three arrows of time-space comes into play, since, as we have already explained, smaller parts run paradoxically faster time clocks than larger beings which have more entropy, so both can work together in symbiosis to create the scales of size in space and different speed of time clocks of the Universe.

And yet, *not even the astounding experimental evidence of multiple scales in nature, validated further by relativity with its infinite time clocks has changed the paradigm of a mechanical clock and a human anthropomorphic scale of single space-time; as none of the multiple* proofs against the entropic big-bang coming from the last decades, treated in our articles on astrophysics, which should have definitely settled the issue has changed, the CULTURAL DOGMAS of astrophysics, hauling from the mechanist, pious founding fathers of this science with their religious, Newtonian beliefs in absolute time-space and the worldly military profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons.

**The different hypothesis over the number of scales.**

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the *mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite. *

*On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one. *

In terms of mathematics, ∆nalysis becomes self-evidently the most important branch of mathematical physics. But as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best to parametrize and model the 5D.

The 3 different perspective departing from a certain point of view, in this case man, gives different perceptions of larger and smaller beings as the distortion of their time clocks and size steps vary.

And this gives birth to 3 possible hypothesis:

- That they are both equal in identity terms (not likely). Then the game constantly repeats.
- That they are fractal in its equality, that is, they maintain most isomorphisms but are ‘varieties’ of different the with certain ‘space-time’, exi=st constants changed. Then for higher and lower 10 scales that conform other full game there will be a parallel type of Universe.
- That they are only the 10 scales that there is. That is, that the Universe is NOT infinite in scales but 10-scalar. And this theory gives birth to two possible scenarios. that the Planes of the Universe are identical because we humans perceive them – limits upwards and downwards, then the equation moves to the mind, considered now a system which perceives equally smaller and larger beings – somehow with similar mental senses. Or that they are really, objectively the end-limits and so we talk of a flat Universe with a limit of scales in the 5th dimension, which seems unreal for many reasons – we cannot conceive a universal dimension in finite terms and it is not sound epistemologically.

We shall here only consider the formalism that unifies the atom and the galaxy, and maybe in the future will discuss some of the awesome metric systems above described of possible limits in the 5th dimension to all those Universes.

By the same reason, we do not know the exact nature of the Ot element of a Star, which brings about a general uncertainty of any relative past-present-future, topological structure of the Universe, where the relative future (center) and past (membranes) are rather invisible compared to the central region of ‘present’ larger, evident space-time cycles.

In topology we talk of closed and open balls. The Œ-fractal knots of space-time cycles of the Universe are from an external point of view, often open balls, where the central point and the membrane seem not to exist. But from the internal point of view of the Œ-mind they are closed balls. That is, they do have an ∆-sphere structure.

Now the procedure to study with the isomorphic method those scales is the inverse of the present astrophysical method: we study downwards with the synthetic method the whole first as a super organism with a world cycle, in this case the super organism of the galaxy with its quasar world cycle.

Then we study its inner parts, its cellular parts, and then only finally its outer world, its cosmological realm.

And we study first the organic properties of the system as they are the teleological finality of all systems (to survive by having an efficient ternary structure in space), then we study its 3 ages of life, and then we study its actions and scales in the five dimension. Only with this synthetic knowledge of the system, which does not require more than simple mathematics, as it is an organic biological description of it, is completed.

We enter into the details of the other 5 secondary isomorphisms, filled with mathematical equations that explore first, the ratios and processes and interaction between the parts of the system in space (6th isomorphism of social classes and 7th isomorphism of universal constants), and then we study it in time (8th isomorphism of diversification of species), to finally study it in scales of the 5th dimension (9th isomorphism of social decametric scales and constants).

The o-isomorphism of the mind of the system as it is also an unknown, and the non-Euclidean geometry of the system is studied in the analysis of its fractal generator and growth of scales from points to lines to planes, can be analyzed at any time. I do usually consider it the ‘metaphysical element of each science’ and discuss it either as the alpha (specially in human systems, where we accept both in societies and individuals the existence of an upper informative caste or neuronal mind) or as the omega, in systems such as a galaxy where to know that the Black hole seems in Maldacena equations to represent in 5D a 4D cosmic body, is not relevant at all.

Yet we only perceive the light membrane of informative electrons and electromagnetic forces. So the thesis derived of the unification equation that shows the ‘invisible’ world of quarks with 99.9% of our mass to be self-similar to the cosmological world of black holes and dark Entropy, which means that a galaxy is an atom of the next scale is a metaphysical question, cannot be tested experimentally.

A more extreme theory of ‘Endophysics’ would imply that our perception diminishes with distance and size; and so we perceive so little of those huge and small worlds that they seem totally equal to us, because our mind-world reconstructs self-similar forms with so little information, but they are not. This thesis derives of the fact that what we see is what the mind constructs with bits and bites of information and Entropy, not what there is out there. And so it might be possible that the mind first constructs always simple spheres and lines, without detail and so we see galaxies and atoms as self-similar forms. But this ‘Cartesian concept’ seems too subjective to me.

In any case, we can only know-know the world of man around us. In other words, biology is the queen of sciences, as all systems are invariant, and so we can know better the details of systems of multiple space-times, studying us, the measure of all things.

All this said, the strongest proof that the fractal scales of the Universe are infinite and self-similar (not identical) making possible the concept of infinite repetitions is obviously the fractal Unification equation of charges and masses, U.C _{G,C} × M = w^{2} × r^{3} that relates electromagnetic and gravitational forces at the scale of atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes. Thus if the Universe has infinite fractal space-times, each one will define with its fractal U.C._{G} a different content of spatial speed and informative density. Yet, as the Unification Equation of G and Q, of masses and charges shows, all will be vortices of space and time, sharing flows of lineal Entropy. So the Game of Exi=stence, its time arrows and scalar structures will remain.

In the fractal paradigm, the electromagnetic and gravitational membranes belong to 2 different realities, the microcosms and the macrocosms, between which mankind are sandwiched. Yet the macrocosmic gravitational and microcosmic, fractal membranes are self-similar worlds: if we treat charges as microcosmic masses and compare the structure of cosmological galaxies and microcosmic atoms, we find a striking self-similarity, already noticed by Eddington (theory of the great numbers).

And the metaphysical question is if that self-similarity goes beyond the galaxy and below the atom into a higher and lower scale, in which case a galaxy will be an atom of an infinite higher Universe and/or an atom will be a galaxy of an infinite smaller Cosmos. All in all there are 3 possible hypotheses for the Universe, according to the ternary principle that gives birth always to 3 solutions and forms to any informative system or question:

– Max. Ps: The galaxy is homologous to an atom, so we are truly nothing and the Universe extends to infinity. We exist in a Universe, which is a hydrogen cloud of gas, and most galaxies are simple Bohr atoms with central proton black holes. And beyond there are infinite atoms and upper scales.

– sp=Ti: There are not upper and lower scales beyond the galaxy and the atom. So galaxies are the highest units of an infinite space-time. This is the most boring hypothesis of them all.

– Max.To: Galaxies form complex organizations and are cells of an organic Universe, pegged to other organic Universes. The Webb telescope might illuminate this hypothesis if it finds a wall of radiation at z=100c, which would be an indication of a new hyper-decametric scale of dark matter and Entropy.

String theorists (duality between the small and big) hint also at a possible further hierarchy between the next smaller scale (the string) and the highest possible scale imagined by mankind (a Universe-like a string, made of 100 billion galaxies). A string membrane and a Universal membrane can be treated with self-similar equations in some models of string theory (even if a more accurate treatment requires background independent string theories, in which the error of Newton – an absolute Cartesian space-time – is corrected). The principle though remains invariant in all those models: It is possible to create a reality of infinite hierarchies, in which each scale is self-similar but no equal to the next hyper-scale of the Universe, set by its fundamental stable entities, which are the immortal protons and black holes.

The infinite scale theory is on my view the most probable, because it has more experimental evidence: the fractal, network structure of the galaxies and dark Entropy, shown in the previous picture is quite obvious. Further on, the existence of such fractal, bigger social scales have been shown by the astrophysicist Pietronero in its study of the Sloan grand scale mappings of galaxies^{11}.

*Recap*. The hypothesis of an ∞ hierarchical Universe is reinforced by the fractal Unification equation; by Eddington’s theory of big numbers that relates a proton radius and the radius of the galactic big-bang; by the work of Pietronero mapping the grand scale structure of galaxies and our understanding of a fractal network of dark matter that surrounds them.

Yet before we explain all that, we have to formalize the fundamental discovery we have made – that light is NOT only an energy field in motion but ALSO a form of space; which comes naturally from the fact that:

Knowledge is relative to a fixed, still frame of reference, but that frame of reference is always in motion. It is in fact both things. IT depends on how we see it

Einstein saw space-time fixed, Galileo the sun fixed, Ptolemy the earth fixed, Abrahamic religions saw man fixed as a life point of view.

**It is the Universe infinite and eternal?**

**The** founding father of relational space-time, Leibniz, affirmed that we lived in the most perfect of worlds, where each point was a world in itself, a commentary which brought much derisive laugh during the XVIII c. ending in the cynical best-seller of Messieur Voltaire, ‘Candid’.

It is though the most perfect of worlds because it is immortal in time, infinite in space, absolutely simple in its ultimate program of existence, ∆i->∆æ->∆e->∆œ->∆û, perception-motion-feeding-reproduction-evolution…

And yet the more complex of worlds when its infinite iterations combine into the varieties of species in existence.

But why we know it is infinite and immortal?

The immortality of the Universe is born in the very nature of its ultimate substance: 2 formal motions, where the ‘form’ is the mirage of the senses of a o-mind that gauges by simplifying all the information of the infinite Universe into bidimensional still mappings that can fit in the mind.

So we see forms but all is motion (Galileo’s Paradox: e pur si muove). And since motion is the nature of |-space and O-Time, there is no way to stop the flow of space-time and its infinite actions. Because a line is just part of a very long cycle that closes into itself, the universe is constantly breaking into pieces that come together into wholes to be dissolved in the explosion of On-2 death.

But the proof of its infinity and absolute relativity depends on a question: are the scales of parts that become wholes, which dissolve into death in big bangs of energy, back into ‘planes of space’ (corpses, antiparticles, big bangs: M->E). That is, there is in the limits of our direct perception of reality,On±3, galaxies and atoms, any hint that the scales are so similar and so much embedded in lower and upper On±4 planes which we hardly perceive but make us think there is beyond and below new unending Universal Planes?

If so, if each galaxy is just the beginning of an infinite number of higher scales and each atom just the wholeness of an infinite number of lower planes, if ∆±∞, is the structure of the 5th dimension. If the 5th dimension is both lineal (without apparent limit in its co-invariance: Sæ->∞ / To ->∞ = C), and cyclical (with repetition of form between the limiting scales of atoms and galaxies), the Universe is absolutely relative (any Ot is both an infinite and an infinitesimal) and man has no importance, beyond its perception of everything from its centered o-point of view: Man = ∆o.

** 5D, Absolute Relativity and the meaning of knowledge.**

Now, absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Œ is even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 10 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

**IV. BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES- SCALES. **

**BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES.**

**The ‘fifth’ SCALAR dimension from a discrete perspectives: networks of points. The language of topo-bio-logical space-time beings; the supœrganism.**

In essence, in Systems sciences we work with two arrow/motions/informations/ forms in action, energy systems and information ssytems.

What this systems do are actions – defined in quantum physics as E x i= K, combinations of energy and information. In youth though they do more energetic actions as the body dominates. Those are actions related to one of the two arrows of ‘future time’, of change and motion in the Universe, Se and Ti. E is fastest motion, defined in geometry by the line. So bodies and fields energy or entropy,are lineal, move fast, expand space .

Then there are particles and heads that process ‘cycles of time that carry a frequency of information and have more form.

This is what particles do in physics: gauge information. This is what your head does: accumulates information about cycles of form in motion around you and then process it into ‘mental images’ that vary those cycles and extract a final cycle-conclusion you perform. You are an absorber of cyclical information that determines your actions. And those actions tend to make you survival and are basically 4 – internal actions transformed into the external universe: you feed energy to your body, you gauge information to your mind, you reproduce both, exi, and then you organize socially at certain stages of your existence, as seminal cell, as member of a society, with other human-like you forming bigger social organisms.

So this defines the equation generator of cycles of space-time, ∑exi=st:

Where ∑ (eusocial behavior); E (energetic behavior); x (reproduction); I (informative behavior), are repeated in cycles masterminded by an informative knot-body system, which is the ‘relative constant space-time field’, st, sum of all those cycles.

And we call:

∑exi = st, the function of existence of any being.

The function defines many things in the universe:

It defines your actions of love, ∑, of feeding, e, of gauging information, i and reproducing exi, and as a result it defines externally certain space-time cycles, s, which you do and others can observe. THUS IT IS ALSO YOURSELF. Your body-head: E<=>I, in perpetual exchange of energy and information.

It is your existence indeed, and that of any other entity. And so in each time of life, you will ‘commit’ actions that will vary along the path of youth, maturity and old age.

The economic system that reproduces memes of metal, machines and lineal weapons, was first ruled by cyclical coins of gold, today converted in electronic cycles of digital information in the minds of computers…

In this manner, languages of Information create the future of all the energetic systems of reality.

All complementary systems have a limited quantity of energy and information, which they have to renew in order to survive, what determines their 4 repetitive, survival strategies of behavior or arrows of future time.

They will try to obtain more energy for their body and more information for their mind.

They will try to reproduce the form of the system in other region of space time to survive after death.

And they will associate with similar entities, forming bigger, cellular superorganisms that live longer in time and occupy wider vital spaces.

For example all physical particles can be defined by 4 quantum numbers that describe those actions among physical entities that absorb electric energy, are guided by magnetic information, decouple into self-similar particles and associate with other particles in more complex atomic and molecular societies.

All biological entities are defined as such when they show those 4 drives of existence, feeding on energy, perceiving information, reproducing into similar species and associating with other individuals of the same species in herds and superorganisms.

All what we human beings do is to feed on energy, perceive different languages of information, reproduce our children, forming families and evolve socially under the mandate of eusocial love expressed by ethic religions and constitutions with other human beings into cultures, nations, religions and civilizations.

Finally, company-mothers, the ‘free citizens’ of markets, reproduce machines that imitate and substitute humans organs of energy and information, and have become social cells of a super-organism of machines, the global stock-market.

Let us of those postulates studied in detail in the sub-sections of ‘Space’, the organic meaning of the 4th postulate that defines a topological organic network.

Once the concepts of spatial energy and temporal information are properly defined, and the 5 postulates of Non-E Geometry understood we formalize a superorganism, as a particular case of the Generator equation of quantic energy and temporal information, Sp<=>Tƒ, which defines in this case the 4 fundamental elements of any super-organism:

Cellular units (S)

Networks of energy or organic, energetic space (∆+1 that create energy-body systems).

- Networks of information (Tƒ that creates information-brain systems)
- Networks that reproduce energy and information (<=>, that create organic, reproductive systems).

Reproduction can be external to the being, catalyzed by an enzymatic agent, as when men reproduce machines or DNA reproduce amino acids, or internal (then we talk of a living superorganism) Thus:

∑ E*nergy cycles/networks: Organic body<Flows of energy-information>∏ informative cycles.*

Where an E<=>T cycle is a feedback loop that engages energy and information quanta. So we affirm that:

*‘All natural entities are superorganisms that transform back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping space-time cycles: *∑*Spe<=>Tƒ’.*

Which allows us to unify the properties and structure of all *Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single *template *definition, according to which systems and super-organisms will *differ only in the degree of complexity of its networks and the specific energy or information we put into the template’s brackets and the size or complexity of its networks:

‘*A super-organism, (name a specific super-organism) is a population of (name a particular species), related by information networks (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy). A system is a partial super-organism, composed of a population of (name a particular species), related either by energy or information networks. A living super-organism is a super-organism in which the energy and information networks combine to achieve self-reproduction through a third, reproductive network.’*

Thus we classify all systems of the Universe in 3 scales of growing complexity, systems proper, super-organisms and living super-organisms.

Let us then use the previous template to define the main organic systems of the Universe, from the smallest form known to man, the atom, to the biggest one, the Universal Superorganism:

– *An atomic superorganism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy. *The atom is the simplest super-organism that starts the evolution of complexity in the Universe.

*– A molecular superorganism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Van der Waals forces). *

The biggest of those super-organisms are crystals, the most complex DNAs.

*– A cellular superorganism is a population of molecules, related by networks of water-based energy (cytoplasm, ribosome, cilium) and networks of genetic information (DNA-RNAs.) *Thus a Eukaryotic cell is a super-organism made of smaller cells (organelles) and carbohydrate molecules.

*– A human superorganism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems). *Recently we have discovered that human beings are hybrid super-organisms, as 90% of our cells and most of our genetic material belongs in fact to bacteria.

*– An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey). *And the entire sum of all those ecosystems is Gaia, the living super-organism of the Earth

– *A historic superorganism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.*

So History can be considered as the super-organism of mankind that extends in space over the Earth and in time, from the first man to the last man that will live in this planet.

*– An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc.).*

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic super-organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and includes 2 different species: human beings and machines.

*– A galaxy is a population of electromagnetic stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and light energy.*

-A Universe is a population of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and dark matter.

**EARTH’S EVOLUTION : BIOLOGICAL SCALES**

**0±2**

A few things thus are becoming clear. First the Universe is like a game of Russian dolls, of 0±∆ planes which are encased into each other, from the purest 0 K black holes and – gravitational forces, into the more disordered, waving ≈ light-space and galaxies of plasma, encased within the larger Universe. And so that makes sense of our notation, we are coming collapsing into the human scale. And the next scale beyond those galaxies made of atomic particles, is the 0±2 plane, of groups of atoms, called molecules and its factories, stars, which are factories of atoms that escape them when the star dies in nova explosions and form molecular matter in huge groups.

**0±1**

Then it comes the next scale of organization, that of planetary worlds, and its molecular groups of liquid, solid and gaseous huge masses of molecules or very complex organizations of them, called cells.** **

# V. SOCIAL SYSTEMS.

**SOCIOLOGICAL SCALES**** **

**∆o**

And finally sandwiched between the cell and the world of which we are part it comes mankind, us, the ∆-scale.

**SOCIAL MODELS. THE FIFTH DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL LOVE**

‘The languages of God are infinite’ UPANISHADS, on the fact each mind has a language, with the same ternary F(t) operandi G(S) syntax, NOT only mathematics.

‘Love each other as I have loved you’

Jesus* On the arrow of eusocial love , the program of ‘God’ that builds up the 5th dimension.*

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’ *Einstein, on what truly should matter to science – the whys.*

‘The why is the only thing a physicist does not question’ * Feynman (On the reductionism of physicists)*

‘ I know the non-AE thoughts of God; the mind of the Universe, since I am made to its image and likeness’ *ls*

‘Reality is an organism with a mind called logos and a body called the Universe’ Plato

**PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS. A new paradigm changes our view of the Universe.**

As you can see, the 5th dimension paradigm has changed completely our philosophy of the Universe and upgraded completely our perception of it. There is no longer a single time, the human clock, and a continuous space, but an infinite number of pieces of time and space. Today some physicists wonder on those paths, such as the remarkable work of Smolin and others with their theory of quantum gravity, in which space is made of infinite quanta and time is made of infinite clocks.

But those theories as always in physics, are restricted to mathematical mappings of a geometry of multiple spaces and times. The work we are describing here goes much further as it intends to apply its discoveries also to biological and social sciences and the causal logic of time, to theory of information and philosophy of perception, creating a veritable unification of most sciences and upgrading our logic and mathematical languages….

*It is a paradigm that was started by Leibniz who realized that time clocks are infinite; hinted at by Einstein who said ‘I seem to be the only scientist who thinks time speeds are different in different regions of the Universe, and finally formalized by this author in the milieu of systems sciences to make it useful for hard science with new mathematical and logic tools. *

As all new paradigms of science however the present stage of studies of the 5th dimension is limited to a few researchers and disputed by the practitioners of the previous paradigm – the study of the 4th dimension of a single space-time continuum. In any case, given the skepticism and limits of ‘reason’ of most humans, who believe in previous scientific paradigms and will not even consider a serious analysis of the 5th dimension, we will start explaining why scientific paradigms keep evolving… and finding resistance from old ones, analyzing the expansion of our point of view of the Universe from subjectivity and religions myths into objective science – a process, which despite the ‘belief’ of many scientists has not ended and won’t probably end with the new paradigm of the 5th dimension, just a step in a quest to find ‘the total information of the Universe, which is only known to itself’ (J.Haldane).

It should not; since according to the laws of the scientific method a new paradigm merely expands the discoveries of the previous one, validating them from a wider perspective.

How can we do that? Thanks precisely to the mathematical and logic rigor of this theory that Leibniz lacked despite its insights in the concepts of ‘relational time’ and ‘fractal space’. And to do so we have to establish with modern rigor what mathematicians and physicists call the ‘geometry’ or metric of space-time – a description with mathematical equations of the elements of a space-time that remain invariant, without change, allowing the stability we perceive in the Universe.

But to do so we cannot longer rely on a shallow, simple mathematical description of it. We need specially to upgrade the logic, perceptive way we do science. It has been too easy for previous paradigms to go onto mathematical equations without knowing what we meant by words such as time (‘what a clock measures’ even if it was said by Mr. Einstein is not really a good definition), space, dimension, wave, particle, information, energy, etc.

Huge errors in physics happen, such as those of Mr. Hawking with his obtuse theories about time travel to the past, information lost in black holes, which become time machines evaporating back in time, ‘—motions’-only theories of a dying Universe, big-bangs that kill it, 10-dimensional strings, etc. etc. because physicists just take a few equations and start to play with numbers and then put words to those numbers without any logic or conceptual rigor; even forgetting how it all started.

Take the concept of time, ‘what a clock measures’. A more sophisticated definition was that of Galileo, V=s/t. All other definitions of time, including Einstein comes from that equation. But what that equation means? Merely the study of how entities change their position in space.

An entity is in A and then it is in B and time has changed that position. So what really time means is ‘change’. And ALL forms of change define a time event. So there are change in the motion and position in space of entities and this is PHYSICAL CHANGE-TIME. It is what Galileo studied. But then there are changes in the morphology, in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings and this is also therefore time, evolutionary time what Biology studies.

Time is change and this definition must precede any disquisitions of the kind physicists do, unaware that if time is change, there are infinite changes in the Universe, hence infinite time clocks. Hence things like Mr. Hawking ‘black holes as time machines’ derived from the use of a SINGLE time-clock, the human clock to measure time ARE just nonsense. Since each clock is independent of all other time clocks of the Universe. But if black holes cannot travel to a single time past then they cannot evaporate.

Further on most physicists unaware that information is also an arrow of time, in fact the most important, tend to spatialize time and consider only a 4th dimension or ‘arrow of time’ towards the future called ‘—motions’. So the Universe dies into the future. Again this is a simplistic reduction. Information is also an arrow of time towards the future. And again if we apply this to Mr. Hawking’s work we solve his paradox of information: because systems do increase information towards the future (so we live longer and learn more, our societies become more complex, stars go towards the center of the galaxy with more form, etc. etc.).

Problem is that for that reason black holes do NOT evaporate, but create mass evaporating our electromagnetic worlds (so if one is made at CERN and other experiments, based in 4D physics and ‘—motions’ wrong theories, we will all die, but that is another story->www.cerntruth.com)

All this said 4 FUNDAMENTAL conclusions of 5D metric that CHANGE completely our perception of reality are:

– The Universe is eternal, made of 2 motions in perpetual e<=>o change, NOT of substances.

– Since the metric of 5D for the whole space-time Universe are the same than the equation which defines the 2 parts of any system, we conclude that we do NOT exist over an independent space-time but we *are made of space and time, each of us is a complex system made of bits of temporal information, of circadian or physical clocks and surfaces of vital space, imprinted by the form of those cyclical in-form-ations.*

In physical systems all scales and particles are background dependent, *constructed with pieces of spatial energy and temporal information, starting with the smallest theoretical scale of *background dependent, lineal, open strings which *are* rods of Planck’s space and cyclical, closed strings which are the tiniest Planck’s time-clocks.

– Since all systems are made of Se and Tƒ, 5D Isomorphisms and laws *apply to all systems of the Universe, *creating a PANTHEIST Universe, a fractal of its Fundamental Particle, the Complementary Systems, SexTƒ=k.

– All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions: *MOTIONS WITH FORM*

**A NEW R=EVOLUTION OF SCIENCE.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ *Steane*

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of space-time organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch*. *

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal, disordered space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its *combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.*

For that reason, we have added for good measure to the quote of Steane, the philosophical thought of Einstein, author of the previous paradigm of 4D space-time, which corresponds to the limit of this model in a single space-time continuum described with a single arrow of time, ENTROPY.

The truly interesting element of Mr. Steane’s definition is however in the final sentence, which is one of those magic clear-cut expressions of reality, coming out of nowhere, like the sentences of Schopenhauer with his intuitions for century to come. Mr. Steane simply understands there is a second arrow of time, information and somehow a third element, which he does not fully recognise but it is there, the third arrow of time, momentum – the present, iterative=repetitive conserved quality, mixture of the other two, which is what the Universe is all about: the reproduction and hence dynamic conservation of momentums composed of informative particles (masses and charges) and entropic motions (speeds), which we integrate into ‘conservative, closed energy world cycles’ – the whole trajectory, life or rather ‘existence’ of any event or process of nature.

In the graph we illustrate the 3 motions≈topologies of time-space.

It must be said a priori that we are here taken concepts of physics to a new level of philosophical understanding to describe the 3 arrows of time – so by entropy we mean the ‘disordered, expansive motion of space’ proper of big-bangs and deaths of matter. Since physicists have a very poor understanding of their concepts but an excellent mathematical praxis describing reality, they make a mess when we realise how different are their ‘dual concepts’.

So entropy is in philosophy of physics disorder, expansive gaseous states, and from here we take the concept, *enlarged to all scales, as philosophy of physics has done, but only to disorder, expansive motion, which are 1/3rd of the motions that take place in a ‘world cycle’ of time (you can consider it as ‘one of the diameters’ of the π-cycle)… *

*W*hile in statistical thermodynamics and mathematical physics (theory of information), entropy is a measure of the ‘ternary paths of future’ available to each ‘partition’ of an ensemble of molecules with a very defined mathematical equation, S=k lnΩ, which we will do properly explain in our introductory article on thermodynamics, and use the concept to study the causality and probabilities species have to take any of those 3 paths

. As systems, we shall find, can evolve only in three directions of space-time, in as much as there are only three type of ‘moving geometries’=topologies; limiting and guiding the ‘formal evolution’ of a system, which will either repeat itself in an iterative path; or warp, increasing its forms, its in-form-ation, in a vortex-like accelerated future, of higher frequency and lesser space, or inversely will expand in a decelerated explosion that erases its information. And we call this ‘big-bang’ death or dissolution of the system, the arrow of entropy and death.

So we clarify *with the guidance of the topological varieties of the Universe* and the foggy concepts of physicists, when interpreting its awesome beauty-equations.

Back to the duality of entropy-only theorists (physicists) and information only theorists (cybernetics), the fault is on the one-dimensional limited mind of man who has an aristotelian logic, of 0 vs. 1, true or false (ab. A-logic), which is NOT the i-logic structure of the Universe (ab. Non-Æ, non aristotelian time logic and non-euclidean fractal space).

So even before we go further to clarify also we are upgrading logic and maths from human single minds into the next ‘letter’, i, the logic of information, the logic beyond Æ, which is a logic of co-existence, between three elements of reality, entropy, information and its momentum-energy combinations in time, of co-exitence of three symmetric topologies of space, the limbs/fields of motion, the wave-bodies of energy and the particle-heads of information, and a logic of co-existence of three fractal scales of ‘being’ the ∆-1 atomic/cellular scale, the ∆-thermodynamic/organic scale and the ∆+1, ecosystemic/gravitational scale of physical and biological systems – we omit often for simplicity the third group of social disciplines with its 3 social classes, scales and topologies of nations and civilisations).

All what exists; all entities of the Fractal Universe including human beings are systems made of two COMPLEMENTARY geometries: languages and heads of information that perceive and guide blind bodies of moving energy.

And we can recognize those complementary puzzles of nature, called in the jargon of Systems Theory, Fractal Points, by their opposite, geometrical shape and properties. Since the cycle is the form that stores more information in lesser space and the line is the fastest distance between two points.

For example, all physical species are made of lineal fields of moving energy, shaped by cyclical particles of information.

All living organisms are made of planar bodies of moving energy guided by spherical heads of information.

All Human societies are made of human citizens, ruled by politicians and priests, who command nations and civilizations with legal and ethic words.

## **DIMENSIONAL**** CREATION**

**I. THE CREATION OF DIMENSIONS**

How dimensions are created? It is rather simple, but different for each new dimension and ruled by the laws of the 3rd NON-e POSTULATE, the most important and less understood of geometry, concerning the nature of parallelism and perpendicularity.

LET us consider 2 cases here.

*A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space.*

Above we show how dimensions of distance can become dimensions of motions. So the contraction of a 3rd entropic volume becomes a bidimensional accelerated space vortex and vice versa.

A more interesting case is described by the cross product, as it crates the 3rd space-time present, reproductive, ‘energy’ dimension of physical systems.

In vector algebra, the cross or vector product (is a binary operation on two vectors that creates a three-dimensional space (R3), denoted by the symbol ×.

Given two linearly independent vectors a and b, the cross product, a × b, is a vector that is perpendicular to both a and b and therefore normal to the plane containing them. It has many applications in mathematics, physics and engineering. More generally, the magnitude of the product equals the area of a parallelogram with the vectors for sides; in particular, the magnitude of the product of two perpendicular vectors is the product of their lengths.

The cross product is anticommutative (i.e., a × b = −(b × a)) and is distributive over addition (i.e., a × (b + c) = a × b + a × c).

It also depends on a choice of orientation or “handedness”.

What all this means generally is that a and b are $pe and tïƒ functions and axb is therefore an ST ‘new dimensional form’.

And the beauty of it is that it also has an ∆-interpretation depending on which is the DOMINANT arrow $pe or tïƒ, upwards (so it becomes an informative growing ∆-dimension) or downwards (so it becomes an entropic diminishing ∆-direction).

This in abstract might sound very general but when we study mathematical physics, we shall see what it means. Consider for example, the field of light space-time:

In the graph, the cross product of the ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC, Tïƒ and $pe elements creates the 3rd dimension of reproductive speed in a light ray, and both a*re perpendicular to **maximise the ‘inner product space’ they ‘absorb’ to reproduce its form in the speed of the wave*

**∆º: THE MENTAL POV. **

How dimensions grow and disssapear. They tend to pass from stop-space-distances/forms into motion/time states, and vice versa giving birth to processes of contraction and expansion, reproduction of events and probabilities that become populations, frequencies that accelerate and seem solid as motions from a far away observer. Some examples are given in the next images: he earth-moon system appearing as a solid ring when observed very slow as in the case of Saturn rings convert only in the mind-perception, a single particle (the earth) into a ‘cyclical form’ or a cyclical form (saturn ring’s with motion) into a static disk:

So dimensions are reflections of motions in time, seen also as fixed space. What dimensions are NOT is a parody of the concept simplified ad extremum to become just ‘euclidean lines’, which bring us very funny drawings of ‘attempts’ to ‘convert’ all the dimensions of the Universe to string spatial lineal euclidean dimensions, entelechies of the mind:*In the graph, a false 4th and 5th dimensions (which are dimensions of time) drawn as dimensions of space. Meaningless… The duality of time motion vs. space distance makes those weird representations unneeded. There is NOT a 4th dimension of space, but 3 symmetric time dimensions, and when we have a system with 3 topologies of space and 3 ages of time, it is a unit for a larger ∆-scale, which brings us:*

**The building of dimensions, where there are the**** geometrical planes of 5**^{th}** dimension**

The fact that most laws of (Greek) geometry can be proved in bidimensional planes of information, Ot, without motion means a lot of things.

First, that human minds extract the 4th dimension of motion and reduce the 3rd dimension of depth, to see bidimensional planes which they add together to make up a 3^{rd} dimension, and then put just a ‘bit of motion’ to ad the time dimension. In this manner the mind perceives a holographic universe.

But as the mind observes reality, and the closer it does, the higher chances of survival it has, we conclude that reality also works as a holographic ‘mess’ of planes of Se, Spatial energy and To, Temporal form (and its <≈> Combinations):

Se <≈>To

This the greeks understood at the end of his geometrical age with the concept of conics, whereas an informative cycle, Ot, and a perpendicular plane Se, suffice to create all the curves <≈> – the so called conics, of the Universe.

Thus there are only 2>3 truly different plane species, cyclical tall informative time and flat planes of space, with its hyperbolic combinations.

In the present analysis of a single space-time continuum in physics (General Relativity) this concept has shown to be most fruitful in the ‘foliated’ version of Missner, which breaks the block of space-time into sheets that accumulate, one after another, allowing the use of the most general equation of physics (the hamiltonian), and its handling with computers.

Further on the whole Universe appears as a flat sheet of space, in which ‘vortices of time’ (galaxies and masses), add a tall dimension.

Thus all this, tells us something obvious to those who understand: The Universe departs from bidimensional planes of Se (space), Es (space in motion or ‘kinetic energy-entropy’ and bidimensional planes of tall information, Ot, or its moving version, To-time cycles.

The 5D bidimensionality is then reduced to this building concept:

5-Dimensional Universe = 2-Dimensions of Time-Information x 2-Dimensions of Space-Energy= 4 Dimensions, connected through the apex of time vortices to the n+1 upper 4 Dimensional plane and through the ‘energetic base’ of the conic to the lower 4 D n-1 plane.

This, we bring now so the reader do have a mental picture of the 5th dimension, which often people asked me ‘where it is’.

Those time cycles become then as ‘perpendicular vortices’, the ‘connected’element between planes of the 5th dimension, which are called ‘Rossen bridges’ in Relativity, masses and charges and classic physics, ‘physiological networks’, in biology; flows of digital money in economic ‘societies’…

From form we do have to bring function and then see how ‘topological planes’ can be deformed without much tear to mold in each scale the form to the function. In this manner from the clear geometry of simpler planes, through the transformation of ‘spatial dimensions’ into ‘time functions’, we will be able to understand in the same manner a flux of magnetic forces and a flux of financial orders.

But let us not go so far to concepts of the ‘3rd line’ (the rigorous ¬Æ formalism)

**The organic, metaphysical view. **

Of the 3 scales of reality the n-1 scale is perceived as a sum of euclidean points, which is achieved when the ‘finitesimal’ becomes an indistinguishable point on the ‘whole’, which appears then as a continuum.

This is the most reductionist process that damps the ‘vital properties’ of the points as a ‘mass’ from the larger view of the systems.

Unfortunately it is the commonly used procedure in current Euclidean science of points with no parts – which is shameful, specially in Social Sciences and economics, where humans are tagged with ‘prices’, as ‘objects’ of a wholesale process of reduction of ‘human heads’ to economical points of ‘credit’ and ‘profit equations’, a fact which 5D sciences thoroughly rejects as we shall see on the analysis of U+1 eco(nomic)systems.

And yet, that is how the Universe works, specially when the social scientists does not ‘operate’ on its structure to enhance the power of individual human points.

As Shakespeare put it we are are gods from the n+1 scale, we are ‘buffoons’, indistinguishable points from the n-1 scale. And we are organisms, points with parts, To-minds/heads in our normal scale.

The unequal relationship the points of those 3 planes of existence establish, will give birth to very different (a)symmetries…**.**

What is the Universe? A 5D Game of Non-Euclidean Points of view.

The mathematical unit of the complex universe is the Œ-fractal point, better defined as a Non-Euclidean knot of infinite cyclical parallels f energy and information that converge into the Œ-point.

Ot-points are both points of information, with form, fractal points, non-Euclidean points made of 3 bidimensional geometries. And they are Energetic, points with ‘momentum’, with motion, Œ-points pushed by the E-nergy or E-ntropy motions behind them.

Hence the importance of ‘momentum’ in physics, given the fact that we do NOT see a point without motion (though we can extract mathematical properties from it). So by definition we do prefer in physics, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian canonical analysis, which uses momentums rather than ‘pure scalar’ masses (Newtonian formalism), in the description of ‘physics of motion’; which for this reason is also along bidimensional ‘foliated’ analysis (fluids, General Relativity, Hamiltonian version), and the duality of finitesimals (point-particles, undistinguishable Bose statistics) vs. Wholes, 3 ever pervading ‘realities’ of physical systems.

If we add the understanding of the two asymmetric arrows of 5D geometries (information moving upwards, energy downwards) we have the fundamental elements that we shall use to ‘explain’ properly and correct some of the gruesome errors of the physical Universe.

Thus the units of reality are dimensional points. And all Realities are constructed with them.

This is what we are. Points, which grow in size as we come closer to them, and grow even larger as we enter the region of the ego, till reaching the ultimate essence of it.

The zero point, the fractal point, the Non-Euclidean point, the first postulate of existence, the I…

The Universe is a mathematical, i-logic game of Non-Euclidean points of view that web waves of exi-stence, communicating, cyclically forming wholes that decay back into parts in the process of death, cycling in time and space.

And the understanding of the Is and its i-logic and Non-Euclidean mathematical rules of existence is the game we all play and each mind reflects with a language.

Aristotle was perhaps the man who better understood the Universe as a sum of non-Euclidean points of view, and after him Leibniz, who said that ‘we must regard each point as a Universe in itself’ and indeed, in the fractal Universe each atom is a galaxy, an island Universe of a bigger gravitational scale, and this infinity of self-similar games that are played in different scales is what we talk about, which is resumed in the widening i-logic of those i-points of view, which have internal parts, which have breath unlike the simpler non-e points of view.

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5^{th} postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1^{st} postulate. The 5^{th} postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point *of view*: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.

So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points.

This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.

Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of *points of view.*

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

Non-Euclidean Points of view have perception, they have mathematical view, they have Non-Euclidean i-logic paths or structures of causality in its built-in organic systems and as such can be described as living entities.

Ok, let us be less mathematical now (-; i-logic geometry is also the geometry of the ‘i’ point, made of a line and a cycle.

The i, is thus another symbol I used instead of Œ, as it showed clearly the head-point on top of the line of energy, also for 5D scales, as it was the central i-plane of the i-ndividual. And it was the next letter after AE logic geometry, so i talked of i-logic. And it was the symbol of iteration, reproduction, the present function of immortality; and the central vowel.

So i was by far the symbol that represented it all. I did publish a few books under the name of i-man, which was the name i signed on my 20s when i still thought humans would care to understand…

This said for future, if any, human or robot soul seeks on whatever is left of my deposits of knowledge, now that Im trying to pour on the web a meaningful part of 5D science, i scrapped all those meanings and use i only for the action of iteration. Yet it might appear often specially graphs as the scales of the 5th dimension n±1=i±1) and the symbol of information (now o for observer and cyclical form, and To)

I realise this plurality of i-meanings confused a lot people, which do have an A-ristotelian mind so each ‘entity’ is one-dimensional in its meanings.

Still that I of multiple meanings is the max. I-ndividual scale of each complementary system of the Universe.

I, is in the generator equation, E < => I, the 3rd phase of existence of any event, when all energy dies and information perceives in the verge of death of the flow of existence, exi, <=>, shared between the poles.

I is when you squeeze the food energy in your mouth and as it dies, its informative waves becomes united into a set of perception in your mind

I is that simplex moment in which the focus appears in the image and Still it projects its form in the screen.

I and the sum of Is in time and space brings from the point of each non Euclidean being its ultimate experience as being, as perceiving, as gauging, as mapping, as being intelligent, to be in the I state of solid Stillness, knowing, is to be I, then is…

…the function of maximal information, the i=eye, ego, self-center, dominant mind of each non Euclidean point.

I is the ego function, the Still mind of the perceiver who orders with his future actions in which its thought would be imprinted in the Universe.

The mind that creates, I and the vision it creates, the subjective vision of the black hole parasite, of the nervous system of the pure mind calculating how to imprint itself in the Universal game…

The I is the first postulate of the non-Euclidean, illogic geometry of all systems. There are in any science certain point systems of which we do not know more in the verge of our existential space time membrane, but each point with seemingly remote or small seems to have no content is in fact a set, with sub sets and relative infinities, wholes that become smaller than its cellular parts, when we get all the information of those parts.

All beings are points which are a world in themselves, and so the point world is the unite of it all. Externally it might be always reduced to a mere point of a bigger field, in actions of collective experiences, but internally it feels itself so important.

Yes even the ant feels itself important as an ant.

And we might be seen as ants by systems of national power that control us.

Any real system will have ONLY 3 dimensions of space, specular to the dimensions of time-motion, hence 3 space-time dimensions, to become a fractal island-universe and then the 4th dimension will be that of the mind of the whole, which sees it as a ‘o-point’ or finitesimal of the next super organism, world or island-universe in which the being or mind exists.

So there are 3 dimensions of space-time in each plane. A 4th pure dimension of the mind as a whole, or o-point of the next scale, and then the 5th dimension will be that whole+mind already performing cyclical space-time distance/motions on the larger “§upœrganism” (sorry i love to use new words, and this is how i normally write SuperOrganism, whereas § are the spatial scales, ∆±1 around the o-point and since all organisms are made of energy and form, information, œ is a better way to call a super organism. and to make it shorter, pœr instead of per or, for the ‘reader’ to go back and forth and read twice. In any case this is a whole new concept stretched further than the classic one, and that is the ultimate reason I introduce new words.)

The easiest way to consider the structure of the 3 x 3 + 0 fractal Universe is considering all motions in time in relation with the ∆±1 scales, in which the being performs its actions. In the graph the being through its 3 topological organs in space and arrows of time, will deliver energy and information in inverse directions absorbing and emitting energy for the head-particle informative and body wave energetic systems.

All what exists is performing a motion in space-time, which can be reduced to a motion through the alternate, ±T∆S entropy and information arrows of any system, whereas the symbol ± implies a motion towards higher energy (+) or higher information (-). And the symbol ∆ implies a growth or diminution in its spatial social dimension, as its 3 topologies of space form larger or smaller networks in its internal and external structure.

Motion through the different social scales of space-time never stops happening.

The universe constantly moves in time, so do all beings in existence, as existence of being, is the being in time, the being moving along its 3 ages of time, transforming its inner topologies of energy and information or evolving or devolving socially outside and inside its universe.

So as the being exits, it moves in discontinuous steps which displace it along one of those ∆ Time≈space symmetries that make ‘time move, change’, reality vary.

We can then talk of 3 x 2 motions along the inverse dimensions of ∆, S, and T. So motions to the past or energy motions, motions to the future or informative motions, motions upwards into wholes or social motions, motions backwards dissolving a whole or dissolution-death motions, and motions along space deceleration, acceleration, steady speed, conform the 6 canonic type of motions first analysed by Aristotle, which talked of generation, reproduction and extinction (the 3 motions of time), locomotions in space (±a), and growth and diminutions, ±∆.

What we call life or existence is thus a series of displacements through those dimensions of ∆st.

Combinations of those motions is causal series form the time space symmetries, which we know as events of existence, and the sum of them all is the most important ∆ timespace symmetry or cycle of existence and its topological/age symmetry, move a certain domain of interrelated, network-connected, organic group, the system resembles more and more to a super organism

**Dimensions as the 3 functional organs/topologies: vital spaces, cyclical membranes and o-points of measure.**

We find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):

- The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.

This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0-point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

**The dimensions of time and space. We are all relational space-time beings**

Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).

All of them will be made of:

– A central, informative point, seed, or o-point that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…

– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motions-distances that displaces the system.

This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.

We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”

But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.

And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.

Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6^{th} motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian i-logic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, self-centered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:

*|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads*

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.

I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D space-time Universe and its structure. But you WILL likely deny all those proofs. Since man is not alien to the paradoxical equation of the mind:

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion? The answer is that all has form and motion *at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.*

*Τhis is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never quite fully grasped it.*

So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?

*This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those a ‘priori states’. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. *But as we are in a world of physical concepts, after much ambivalence in the terminology – not in the concepts and mathematical analysis of them – I came to settle in the classic terminology of philosophy based in the relative function of those 2 elements in the systems of the Universe and call generically:

– All states of relative motion ‘time states’ or ‘time ages’. And its study diachronic studies.

– All states of relative form ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study synchronic studies.

And yet keep the formal duality naming O-Time clocks, Time, but also |-Space motions, entropic spatial motions.

Why? Because in *relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:*

*– Tiƒ: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motions-states-forms that carry the information of the Universe. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.*

*– Spe: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.*

* – STœ: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.*

So we introduce you to the much vaster wealth of knowledge provided by the proper understanding of ‘vortices’ of cyclical time and its interaction with res extensa, lineal space.

Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles. How many more dimensions?

Time cycles have actually 3 dimensions, or motions (depending on how you see the cycle, still or in motion), which we have always known.

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sp is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and Tƒ is a cycle of tall time.

*Sp (length, width) ≈ Tƒ(height, frequency)*

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

*Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allow the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. *

*So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional. And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroid-limbs fields, hyperbolic waves-bodies and spherical heads-particles) and its 3 time motions-ages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3 ^{rd} ages). *

*And then every 3 space-time symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5 ^{th} dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scales also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scale with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity.*

**2 manifolds of space-time: the holographic principle.**

One of the most important discoveries of XXI c. science is the holographic principle: information is bidimensional.

We realized in black hole theory that the surface of the black hole stores all its information. This can be generalized to all systems. You are looking at a bidimensional screen that stores all the information of this site.

For long, the study of Einstein’s relativity has made fashionable to analyze ‘4-manifolds’ (manifold means basically ‘geometry’), by incorporating a 4^{th} dimension of time motion; but in fact the Universe creates reality ‘step by step’.

And so as your eye creates a 3^{rd} dimension by mixing the bidimensional sight of each eye, the 3^{rd} dimension is formed by ‘adding’ membranes, layer, ‘strata’ to bidimensional surfaces. And then when those surfaces moved they acquire time dimensions.

This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.

4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of space-time bidimensional forms with motion.

We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.

Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on space-time can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D non-Æ, Euclidean geometry.

We are all fractals of space-time. This might mean nothing to you but it is what you are. And so you are generated by a fractal equation as everything else in the Universe, which as in all fractals has infinite variations over the same theme:

Sp (Vital Flat Space) ≈Ps (Entropic past) < ST (Iterative Present Time-Space) > Tƒ (Cyclical, Informative, Future Time clocks)

In space we perceive this fact as a super organism which simultaneously appears as made of 3 topological organs:

(Planar Fields/Limbs of maximal entropy motion that prey on energy, moving as they convert into expansive entropy their food) < Body-waves that repeat the information and energy of the system in a parallel region of space-time> Tiƒ (Cyclical heads/particles that process information and guide the system towards the future.

The fractal thus is a vital fractal super organism. It is a super organism as this structure happens in a series of scales of growing size and diminishing information, so you are made of cells part of an organism part of a society, and matter is made of atoms, part of a thermodynamic system part of a gravitational cosmic world. So we write the entire equation, considering that all things co-exist in 3 ∆±1 scales of the ‘5th dimension’ as an equation that defines locally a series of diffeomormophic local organism with 3 parts, which co-exist in 3 scales and traces life-death world cycles of existence:

*∆-1: Energy Prey>|-SPe (relative past limb/field system) <Body-wave (relative present iterative system)>Tiƒ (relative head particle system)>∆+1: world*

SPACE DIMENSIONS are always local, diffeomorphic, forming a world-universe with 3 bidimensional topologic space-time form-motion states:

In the graph, the limited, finite dimension of a world are always ternary assemblies of bidimensional space-time dual ‘wave-partice’ states of beings, which assembly its formal motions into efficient, 3 -diffeomorphic dimensional beings, where the dimensions belong to the 4 elements of reality. So they are specialised formal-functionals:

-Length-entropy-kinetic motion- energy: dimension of pure space-distance.

-Height-information. Dimension of pure information, of time-perception.

-Width-informative iteration. Reproductive ST-dimension.

-Frequency, Beat, rhythm, speed of time. Dimension of pure Time.

Those are the 4 dimensions of a being in any scale of the fractal Universe. They are combined through the symmetries and transformations of the organic Universe into all the species of vital space-times, we see around us.

Let us then introduce in more detail the Key element of ST DIMENSIONS, the Generator Equation.

*Spe (limbs/fields) x Tiƒ (heads/particles) = ST (bodies/waves). *

This simple equation is what we call the fractal generator of space-time.

Now in this ‘packed’ fractal Generator, which ultimately is a seed of logic information about the dynamic motions and forms of the Universe, we have resumed a great deal of the Universe, but we have already seen how we can keep adding details (expanding the original equation, TxS=K), iterating them, expressing it from a slightly different point of view.

All Fractals DO have a simplex equation that generates by iteration ALL its ∞ complex parts as scales (as in Mandelbrot fractal).

Thus the Universe as a fractal can be explained synoptically with a single equation that expresses the 3 ‘dimensions’ of time past, present and future, and its 3 symmetric dimensions of space, which are the ‘elements’ that constitute all beings of the Universe:

*Sp(past, energic, lineal limbs/fields)<ST-present, iterative, hyperbolic body/waves>Tƒ(future, informative cyclic particles-heads)*

Now that simple generator resumes the 3 only topologies that form the 3 parts of all organic fractals in space. So all physical systems are made of an o-particle that directs a reproductive wave, which feeds on the energy of a lineal field. And all biological systems are made of an o-head that directs a reproductive body which moves on a lineal limb system. Now if you have a bit of visual imagination, you can see any fractal system of the Universe in those terms.

And as the Universe has only 3 topologies in space, and there are only 3 dimensions in time, we shall observe all what exists is a fractal that emerges departing from its ∆-1 cellular/atomic scale, as a social whole, with 3 differentiated atomic/cellular parts that respond to those 3 topologies and then go through 3 states/ages periods of time, the gaseous-energetic-young age, the liquid, adult, reproductive age and the informative, old age, dominated by one of those 3 topological organs. And then they die…

**The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.**

How those planes of existence build their social planes, of space.

Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of dimensions, since Minkowski grand nonsense in conceptual thought, established departing of its useful mathematical equations of 4-vectors, the concept that time was a dimension of space.

What those 4-vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from space-time symmetries. That’s all.

The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.

Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.

All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wave-like motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given space-time symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.

Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.

In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2-manifold layers which create the ‘3^{rd} dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:

The growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:

It grows in pairs, often of space-time (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesian-hyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present space-time systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.

So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT tridimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVIN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is not-commutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.

So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an space-time plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.

We can in that ensue consider the geometry of Einstein, where time rest -c²t², considering time ‘i’, -c²x-1 = +c².

Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², that is ‘speed not time’.

The description of this complex plane of a space-time 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block, but it is hardly needed, as what humans are more interested on in the exchange of relative energy and information, loose terms in the verbal mode for spatial energy, or lineal planar motions and cyclical, repetitive harmonic oscillators of information, cyclical motions, hence created at least with 2 points (as 2 points in the postulate of geometry of the cycle suffice to create one).

In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3^{rd} dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œ-points’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.

So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uranium-lead crystals.

The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atoms-particles-heads of the same layers.

And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.

Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3^{rd} dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5^{th} dimension.

Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing cheng-tzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of space-time, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.

**The 5 ^{th} dimension.**

*Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

**5D Metric: co-invariance of size and time speed – the generator equation: Sp x Tƒ = C**

Now in a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time.

Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower. This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: S x T = ∆±n and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

*Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? *Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed: *Sp x Tƒ = K.*

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

**THE 10 DIMENSIONAL being ∆•ST**

**The 10th ∆ST dimensional view.**

*In the graph the 10 ‘individual dimensions’ of a fractal space-time being, in this case the Universe with its 3 topological dimensions, 3 dimensions of time, 3 scalar dimensions and the whole warped up but the mind-whole world cycle of the system as a super organism, made of infinite other super organisms, which will each of them display the same structure. *

In the graph, the Universe is a 10Dimensional, vital topology, perfectly deterministic, *as all points have a ternary x ternary causality that ‘anchors’ it in space and time.*

*The generator equation expresses a ‘whole organic system’, as the combination of 3 organic topologies of space, Lineal, spatial limbs/fields, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical informative heads/particles: Sp<ST>Tƒ, which are symmetric to 3 temporal arrows, Entropic, expansive Past (Ps) <iterative present (ST) > Ft: Informative future, and 3 scales of relative size in space and speed in time cycles, the ∆±1, the atomic/cellular, individual/thermodynamic and gravitational/ecosystemic level, which put together form a ‘whole’ being. Those wholes are directed in timespace by a point of maximal information, often a still mapping or perceptive mind, Œ, which carries the program of survival of the organic system in time, developing its ‘world cycle’. The generator is therefore the simplest mode to describe the 3 x 3 + 0=10 COMPONENTS of all the systems of the Fractal Universe.*

The Universe is a fractal of space-time beings. This we know and since a fractal can be reduced to a single ‘cellular’ entity, which will then with different variations become repeated ad infinitum, the essential unit of the Universe is a fractal space-time being, which we represent in:

-Its ternary structure in topological space, made of 3 ‘topological, organic parts’ symmetric to its 3 arrows of time (entropic limbs/fields, hyperbolic iterative body-waves and spherical particles-heads) and related to the 3 fractal scales in which it exists (as smaller, disorganised ∆-1 herds tend to be the energy of ∆-systems, themselves just mere parts of a larger world/ecosystem).

So we can define with an equation through 3 ∆±1 scales, 3 time ages and 3 space topologies any being. But this ‘mechanism’ has a ‘point of view’, a ‘mind’, the most difficult part to accept with the external tools of how science, but needed to make sense of the actions of beings. The whole ‘thing’, extended in 3 topologies of space, 3 arrows of time and 3 scales of size, in fact acquires a survival mind, when emerging as a full whole, broken space-time being, separated from an external Universe by a membrane, coordinated in its internal 3 parts by its physiological energetic, informative and reproductive networks, and ‘acting-reacting’ in his search of energy and information for its body-limbs and head. So we need to consider a final ’10th element’, Ø≈Œ, our symbols for the mind that integrates together the 3 parts of the being and makes it ‘tic’ with the program of survival of space-time beings, ‘ready’ to launch its world cycle of existence in the Universe.

So the Generator equation merely describes with the symbolism of ¬Æ logic topology, the recurrent structure of a dynamic feed-back ternary space-time being, whose Ø-mind has the consciousness of the whole and make it act to survive following the program of Åctions that ensure its existence.

We shall therefore in this post in progress and future extensions in the 10 scales of the Universe describe the fractal generator as a feed back equation that establishes formally the interactions between the 3 parts of the whole which must be found mathematically to be in ‘synchrony’ *to form a whole. *

So there are a series of laws that must apply to a system to define it as a whole, and not as a series of disconnected or evolving parts. And to that aim, the most important rule will be the existence of ‘such mind’ or ‘clock synchronicity’ between the parts.

For example, in quantum physics it implies the correct theory to be Bohm-Broglie’s formalism as we do need an equation for the ∆-1 field-wave (pilot wave in the B2 formalism), besides the canonical ∆-Schrodinger’s equation, to define the ∆+1 particles and this is achieved considering a synchronous clock inside the particle and the phase-field wave. So the generator is not only a formalism but also a guidance as all systems must follow the inner structure and formal ¬Æ logic of the generator.

For those inclined to believe in physicists’ reductionist analysis of all systems, limited to mathematical properties, who dismiss the generator as a fractal equation of i-logic geometry with different dimensions to those of standard mathematics a comment:

Mathematics is not the language of god but probably its best mind-mirror of space and a lesser mirror of the bio logic of time.

We call in that sense space a simultaneous present slice of time, and indeed mathematics today is based in derivatives, which are s/∂t, slices of instantaneous time. What the ternary generator equation introduces are the i-logic symmetries between space and time dimensions, its functions and forms. Let us then remind the reader of those dimensions, embedded in the generator of all systems of scalar space-time

Only then, we will be able to define properly the time arrows of the Universe, its multiple cycles and frequency laws we can fully grasp how the past creates the future and wonder about the perfect design of a Universe which will turn out to be eternal, discontinuous, multiple and with 6 dimensions, 3 of space and 3 of time, self-similar to each other…

**The 3 dimensions of time.**

Indeed, the second of those dogmas of classic physics is the belief that there are only 4 dimensions in the Universe, 3 of space and one of time – an idea derived from the limited study of time as a ‘derivative’ of spatial parameters (distance Speed), by physicists. Physical definition of time, hence defines only an ‘instant of time’, a ‘present’ moment; and this did not change with Einstein, as he still uses Galileo’s definition of time: ∂t=∂s/∂v and works mainly with problems of measure and simultaneity. This of course obtains a great detail on the measures but it does not give us a big picture of all the properties of time, and what we call here the fifth dimension (the evolution of space-time structures from the origin of time till its end). In fact a rigorous definition of the dimension of time is self-evident: if space has 3 dimensions times have also 3, past, present and future, but unlike the 3 dimensions of time which are totally relative and invariant in its properties (so what is tall become long if we just move the coordinates of the entity we study), *time dimensions are different. *

*The properties of past, present and future are not the same.* And though this is not understood fully, scientists have a glimpse to those differences, which we could resume saying that relativity (both Galilean and Einsteinian) study mainly ‘present time’, spatializing it, since space is just a ‘slice’ in the total flow of time of the Universe; the 4^{th} dimension studies the past and its evolution of complex new structures and like the present is a ‘single one’ but the future is created or rather calculated in a different manner by multiples points of view, and causal cycles, which interact and keep a certain degree of uncertainty as to which will be the ‘final path’ that becomes present and then past. In this paper we are mostly concerned with the structure of the past, both in time and in space; since present time or ‘space’ is exhaustively dealt with by physicists and the rules of creation of future require a complete understanding of the past and the present to make sense of them. You can regard the Universe as a sort of flow with the form of a palm tree in which the past is a single line, the present is a dense bulb in which infinite ‘Maxwell’s devils’ are creating their cycles of order from their point of view, and the future is a series of parallel paths, of which only one will become first the most probable and then the single present.

This we can see it experimentally only when we perceive quantum phenomena, as we are ‘perceiving’ often the entire range of time between birth and completion of the existence of a particle and, as time events are so fast at that scale, we can make pictures of the whole ‘latitude of time’ as we make pictures of cars moving, as entire lines.

Or in other words, the past is better understood with the laws of evolution, which show ‘paths that were not made’ when the future was being calculated in the scale of life (extinct mutations), and the strong tree of species that did make it, multiplied and became the main lineage of life till today, and that is the past. Such past obeys a simple program of creation defined by the invariances of form, morphology, in/form/ation, topology, all self similar words, with a sequential order derived of the invariances of time ‘frequencies’, the ‘qualitative’, internal, self-similar new parameter to measure time cycles among which the most important is the ‘life-death cycle’. The result of the interaction of the laws of topology and time-frequencies and its invariants is a self-repetitive process of creation of the same organic super-structures that created from particles, atoms, from atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, planets, galaxies and so on.

This paper as most of the conferences given at ISSS deals with that process and game of creation of the super-structures of reality, its fractal space-times and cycles that sustain the ‘present’ we exist in.

Then that present is mostly studied as a game of motions, momentums, rotations and forces, the invariances of physical space, so exhaustively studied as the ‘4^{th} dimension of time’ by physicists. But such narrow definition of time has self-evident limits. And they are shown in the null understanding by physicists of what is evolution and what is in/form/ation, form and the laws of duality (the interaction of energy and information, the two main ‘arrows’, forms, parameters, ‘motions’ or substances, here also self-similar words, which create together the future).

And this deals with the ‘6^{th} dimension’, the most fascinating one, yet beyond the scope of this paper: How the interaction of the arrows of time-information-frequency-fractal form and energy-motion-distance-force-space (self-similar terms or ‘expressions’ of those 2 arrows of time), which in the past created the ‘complementary systems’ of energy and information of the Universe, will now keep calculating in a causal manner the ‘choice’ of a future.

That this is the process of calculation of a future we know because we can see it in the faster time processes of the quantum world. But as all scales follow the same rules, we can conceptualize that process easily in our scale. For example, in a market, the future price of a share or a bond might seem ‘non-calculable’, but it is, as quantum physicists calculate a path of an electron, as the Universe calculates the future: there will be a number of ‘minor paths’ (individuals betting in favor or against a price or a bond) and the one with more ‘density of money’, (density/probability in quantum physics) will create the market with small corrections due to other big betters with less money. So the future is generally speaking created by multiple agents whose actions aggregate and calculate the ‘winner’ of that future, which will as time goes by become the dominant causal path and then the only past we remember or perceive.

Unfortunately the influence of physics on these themes has been so strong that most scientists today believe that the study of simultaneous present-time in a single scale of the fractal universe (our space-time continuum) is enough to know all about time. How reduced is the knowledge of time that physicists have given to us becomes evident when we think of the difference of ‘volume’ between the present, an infinitesimal of the infinite extension of the Universe and all its motions and time cycles (hence 0 x ∞ = k, a constant, ‘calculable’ volume) vs. the infinite extension of the past, which never started and the ∞ extension of the future that will never end.

In that sense the understanding of the invariances and self-similarities that allow the creation of time and its repetitive patterns and scales – the 5^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions of space-time will mean to XXI century science what the study of the 4^{th} dimension of present time was for the XX c. evolution, what the study of the program of evolution of form, (restricted as we shall see by the invariances of frequency and topology), was to the XIX c. and the work of Leibniz in calculus and relational time was in the XVIII c. – the next step in our comprehension of the ultimate principles of reality ‘space-energy’ and temporal-information.

**A simplex formalism of the dimensions of space and time.**

How the future is created departing from the past? All sciences come to the same conclusion: the future is created by the repetition of past cycles. So astronomy left astrology behind and became a science when we knew the past cycles of sun and Earth’s rotation will happen again. And biology when we knew that viruses reproduce in radiations and cycles that kill life beings and species evolve increasing its complexity. And so on… Time is therefore cyclical: not only flows from past to future but it also curves itself to repeat a cycle, and so we talk of waves of frequencies of time cycles as the *representation of the 5th dimension in its simplest measure.*

But past and future are different and this fact must always be considered to ‘calculate’ the future:

The past is unique, already calculated with the deterministic causality of events but the future is NOT unique, still in a ‘quantum state of uncertainty’, if we were to use physical jargons – still under calculus by the existential actions of the complementary entities of energy and information that create it, if we were to use the jargon of Absolute Relativity… …

This difference between past and future is the key to grasp the ‘meaning’ of entropy and quantum physics, which explain in detail how the ‘future is created’ in the lower scales of maximal motion and minimal information of the universe.

Indeed, Quantum physicists are astounded about the fact that when they observe an electron path, they see all the paths of the electron, all its possible future traces, of which one is the densest, most probable one. What they are observing is how the Universe calculates the future through the creation of multiple ‘fractal’ possible paths of which only one will become the densest, ‘real’ motion and hence it will create the ‘single past’.

Yet since the future is multiple, before it ‘settles’ and freezes into a single past, it includes all the possible Universes/paths, including the past, in the same manner the Past dimension includes all the ‘dharmas of ∂t-present’ and the world-line, all the volumes of space and volume all the planes, and planes all lines, and lines all points.

Thus there are 6 dimensions, which as Russian dolls include the previous ones and so we write a chain equation to define them all:

Sum of points=∑ lines=∑ volumes=∑ presents=∑ past=∑ Futures

*∑∑∑∑ O _{i-5 } = ∑∑∑ |_{i-4 }= ∑∑ *c

_{I-3 }= ∑+ ∂t

_{i-2}=

_{i-1 }=_{i}

The previous equation, which introduces some of the symbols required to study the 5^{th} dimension, shows this growing scale of complexity.

The present is not really the present but just the last ‘dharma’ of a flow of time that comes from the absolute past to ‘today’, time zero. The past is a sum of ‘dharmas’ of 3-dimensional space.

And the future is not only the future, but also the entire flow of time, which we shall latter observe to be cyclical and so infinite yet repetitive. *Reason why the future includes also the past that will be repeated*

And so we can introduce also a new series of fractal dimensions both in time and space, if we consider each total duration and extension of a relative entity=universe, a mere point of the next scale.

So the ‘5^{th} dimension’, which can be considered in a simplified analysis of time the entire length of time between the absolute past and the absolute future, must be divided at least for each ‘local space-time Universe’ between birth and extinction, divided in 3 sub-dimensions, past, present and future.

How then we relate this concept of time dimensions with that of space scales, which we use first to define the 5^{th} dimension?

The answer is an arrow of ‘time’, called complexity, the growth of social complexity and organic creation of complex structures which constantly evolve the Universe from an absolute past of null complexity and pure energy-space without form, without in-form-ation, into more complex social networks: particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells and planets that become organisms and galaxies, which become Universes and planetary societies…

The integration of all sciences into a ‘whole’ set of principles and laws that describe the workings of the universe and all its parts, has been the goal of mankind since the beginning of knowledge.

All those sciences though study different species of different scales of reality. And so we need an integration of those scales as parts of the same system of laws, with parameters of space and time (size and speed of processing information) that vary but once those changes are normalized, appear all of them under the same laws. This is the fifth dimension – the scales of form as they evolve from past to future in time and space.

The 5^{th} dimension is therefore also spatial and real, fractal, complex, informative in its structure – it is the dimension of scales of reality which have evolved from past to future in a morphological game of creation of more complex forms and ever bigger, fractal, vital spaces as the Universe evolved into more complex social systems

**Emergence of a fifth dimension. The 5 invariances of the Universe.**

Absolute Relativity seems to make all knowledge meaningless, hindered by the paradox of Galileo, and all measure relative, as it all depends on the point of view. And so we might wonder what ‘holds all things together’? What makes reality stable?

The answer in a paradoxical Universe is the invariance of certain actions, motions and forms across all the scales of reality.

The fifth scalar dimension is therefore not only the dimension of evolution of form but also the dimension in which the invariances of the Universe across those scales make it stable, immortal, self-repetitive, self-similar.

It is precisely the tension between Invariance and relativity what makes reality both an eternal game of motion and change, and an invariable, self-repetitive game. Since each relativity in the Universe is balanced by an invariance, or else all would become ‘fuzzy’.

Those invariances are the essential laws of conservation of the Universe, and are also ruled by the complementarity law of all systems that must possess energy and information in balance to survive: ExI=K. Thus most invariances and associated concepts such as ‘Universal Constants’ (Physics), or Vital Constants (Biology) are born of the balance between an energy and an information parameter, which allows a force/particle, body/head system to maintain an E< = > I, which maximizes the equation of existence of the system. And vice versa, the definition of death will be the breaking of that invariance and balance: Max. E x Min. I (accidental death) ^ Max. I x Min. E (3^{rd} age death).

In order to exist Dimensions require as constant, fixed features of reality certain laws of invariance, which make them appear stable. The dimensions of classic space reach that invariance due to the invariance of motion and momentum. But all other invariances happen *across scales.*

The invariance of classic relativity meant in physical terms that we don’t have an absolute relative motion. Thus, we might seem still always from our perspective but are not for others. And yet whatever our position and motion and location in the Universe is the laws of motion will be maintained (Galilean-Einstein Relativity or ‘invariance to translations and rotations in space’). But there are 4 other invariances that make the Universe absolutely relative and ‘us’ a nothingness, dust of space time.

Those four new invariances, which apply to all other sciences (hence expanding physical notions to all of them, creating what in philosophy of science is called a General System model of the Universe) are:

– The invariance of scale, studied first by Mandelbrot with his development of fractals and also by Nottale in the field of quantum physics.

– The invariance of topological forms, or in/form/ation, studied by this author with his completion of the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

– The invariance of the 4 quantum actions/numbers that all systems of the Universe follow.

– And the invariance of the laws of time frequencies, which emerge determining the life-death cycles of all systems of the Universe and the invariance of the 3 ages of life, parallel to the 3 states of matter in physical systems.

If we were to use instead the jargon of Systems Sciences we would be talking of ’emergence’ instead of ‘invariance’, meaning that *the laws of all the lower scales of reality emerge in the wholes of the new scale, which follow them*

*So the simplest laws of the simplest scale, the mathematical space-time laws emerge in all more complex systems; notably those laws regarding dimensions, time clocks, parallelism vs. perpendicularity, topology and Non-Euclidean Geometry.*

*Then the main laws of quantum physics will emerge in more complex systems, notably the Law of Complementarity and the Laws of the 4 quantum actions/numbers that all systems, including humans, believe it or not, when we properly translate jargons (the key to emergence) will follow.*

And finally the main laws of biology will emerge in sociological systems notably the laws of social organisms and the laws of evolution, drives of existence, ages and physiological networks (to the point the planet is a living organism, Gaia, but so it is the economic ecosystem.

Thus from a scientific perspective, absolute relativity and its invariant laws fusion the 4 main theories of knowledge of the human species, quantum physics, relativity, evolution and religions/philosophies/organic theories of eusocial love.

We deal in the paper with those 5 invariances: motion (physical invariance), form or information (mathematical invariance), time-frequency (causal invariance), scale (the 5th dimension and more complex invariance) and actions/functions.

Motion and form, where space and form is result of invariance, what makes things seem the same what holds all together.

*There is an invariance that all systems follow, the invariance of all invariances, which makes all beings equal at least in this invariance? This is perhaps the deepest meaning of the equation of existence, to be the invariance of all invariances, as it becomes a function combination of all of them, in which each partial equation is an ation of the universe.*

Now, the study of all the invariances together is in itself a new discipline (the reader must understand that a GST is the origin of multiple new sciences, which will be as the XXI century advances the study of the 5^{th} and 6^{th} dimensions, much more complex disciplines that this introduction). So we might consider as an introduction to the next paragraph, which considers the nature of physical invariances one of its themes applied to physical space – the understanding of *each invariance as the creation of a ‘dimension’ of space-time of a certain fractal ‘world’ or ‘reality’, in this case our light space-time.*

**The dimensions of light space-time.**

In physics, dimensions are either perceived as motions of a light particle tracing a waveform or as fixed, vacuum space.

First when we study a certain system to find its dimensions, we have to define its complementary parts. In waves they will most likely be a ‘soliton’, dominant in information, the densest first particle or envelope wave, which keeps the ‘information’ of the system invariable. And then the wave itself, dominant in energy, which ‘traces’ a wave inside or behind the soliton.

Waves are thus dominant in motion and energy. Yet if the system is a particle, the wave component will be the smaller part – a trace of vibration, which in the simplest particles (photons) is often seen fixed, appearing as our vacuum ‘light-space’. Since the background radiation is space itself: light that moves at c-speed, creating ‘distance’, as our senses freeze speed into Euclidean space (paradox of Galileo).

Those 2 first spatial dimensions of light-space, the informative wave/soliton and the energy amplitude carry information. Reason why we can see them either as motion or as formal space.

‘Smaller scales’ of gravitational space do not ‘cross’ the minimal threshold of information of our senses and remain invisible to us. It does not mean they have no information. It means only we do not perceive their information. And since the product of energy-speed-distance and information is constant, there speed is relatively infinite, non-local:

*Gravitational waves: Energy x 0 information = K->Energy-speed=** ∞*

So the first dimension of a wave is frequency, carried by the soliton that envelopes the wave, which can be seen as a fractal ‘Cantor Dust’ – a series of peaks between empty intervals. Yet perception will ‘fill’ the dark spaces between the series as it reduces infinity into the mapping of perception. Thus, it will seem to us that frequency is a spatial length with dark and clear spaces. And then with higher detail we shall see the intervals and a Fourier series that will determine the ‘density’ of distribution of the cantor dust.

Frequency is the simplest stream of data that Nature produces. But frequency of what? Of time cycles. If masses and charges are as Absolute Relativity proves, mere clocks of time, of different speed and size, ExI=K, then the way to measure it is combining frequency with the fractal steps and we have a two dimensional Peano curve that will fill as the brownian motion of molecules does a bidimensional space.

The 2^{nd} dimension of the wave-particle will be amplitude, which measures the inner quanta of the wave, and so it is given by the energy or motion of displacement along the perpendicular axis to the axis of frequency, and with those streams of information we have enough to make a bidimensional Universe. And this is what speed, measured in objective frequency terms, does: V = S x ƒ

Where frequency measures the number of cycles and S the steps or length of the wave. So the result is ‘fractal speed’, which grows when we come in closer detail and use smaller steps.

Speed, in a fractal Universe *is a scalar, fractal function. This* means that as we perceive smaller scales through the fifth dimension reaching higher detail, as it happens when we measure a coastline with smaller steps, *information and length grows. *Since now we use the concept of frequency, v=s x ƒ(t), where s is the space traced in each cycle of the wave or frequency. For example, if we were to translate the motion of a car into frequency we would use ‘revolutions per minute’ as the wheel is the frequency of motion, where s = 2 π r.

The result is the same but we observe a more realistic picture of a ‘quantum, discontinuous motion’. In the case of a human the step or frequency of motion will around 80 centimeters per step; and so on. Steps though are used to measure ‘fractal distances’, and the length grows as the number of steps, *its frequency grows. Distances, and hence all derivative parameters, speeds, work, energies, which are distance related grow* from our smaller point view. And to keep the invariance of momentum, we shall diminish our perception of time, explaining the effects of the Lorentz Transformations of General Relativity (perception of slow time, etc.) *Since the Universe is indeed a discontinuous space-time fractal*

In such a discontinuous space-time all concepts must be redefined in fractal terms, *which by the Principle of Equivalence are reduced to our continuous ‘equal distances’ when we study only our space-time scale.*

This is equivalent to the introduction of General Relativity, which also introduced a factor of ‘correction’, , which appears only when we consider closer to c-speed.

What is the 3rd dimension of such waves? *Speed*.

If the reader grasps the duality of seeing reality as fixed space or time motion, and the fact that only the product of both remains invariant, and have followed the previous reasoning, and realizes that now each form has a function, each space has a time motion and remembers that we defined the first dimension as a measure of lineal energy, the second dimension as a measure of information and the 3^{rd} dimension as the product of both exi, the it becomes clear we just have ‘defined’ the 3^{rd} dimension of our space, made of waves of light:

The 3^{rd} dimension is exi, S x ƒ, the speed of the light wave, which therefore is perceived as fixed (first postulate of general relativity), and its obtained by the product of electric and magnetic constants (Maxwell equations), which are the energetic and informative fields of the light wave, whose product is perpendicular to each other, creating the 3 dimensions of our perceived Euclidean light-space. Therefore light-space dimensions are our space dimensions, which we see as fixed but in detail, have also motion.

In the study of the 5^{th} dimension, this ‘fractal factor’ of correction appears always when we study a system across the 3 i±1 scales and use frequency instead of human time clocks to measure it.

For example, Energy = k ƒ (t). And indeed, in quantum physics we write E= h ƒ, the equation we used to define mass as a vortex of acceleration. It is interesting now to compare again both equations, E= h ƒ and E= c^{2} M… Since Mass is related and measured with frequencies, this leads again to a deep, revealing similarity; that between frequency and mass, studied in depth in our analysis of Einstein’s mass theory and its future evolution.

Thus while individual parameters might vary what the Universe ‘keeps’ are complementary exi=k systems. So what remains ‘invariant’ in the Universe are precisely those dual structures of ‘energy’ and ‘form’ (momentum in physics, uncertainties in Quantum, etc.).

**Conclusion**

**A dimensional definition of the Universe.**

So we talk also of 5D³ systems of space-time meaning we divide and combine in ternary, s, s=t, t, groupings those 5D3

It follows that the sum of the tree, s + s=t + t gives us a full cycle, with the incissum that s=t = s+t, as it has coupled both:

The Universe is a supœrganism that re•produces information. And it does so towards a final aim, the reproduction of new super organisms, •5D³ systems, of topo-bio-logical nature, with topologic, spatial, organic, scalar and logic, temporal properties.

As such the talking of it can be as detailed as a super organism is, which increases in complexity as it ‘covers up and down’ new dimensions of entropy and information brought together into a new ∆±i super organic structure:

*In the graph, the three arrows of time of a world cycle are intimately connected to the three scales ∆±1 in which the supœrganism realises its existence, up and down the scales of the fifth dimension, from seminal birth into social existence and final extinction.*

In the graph the ten dimensional organism, can easily be divided in ternary grouping according to topology or scale.

The most amazing thing about the dual fifth dimension of space-time that forms all the organisms of reality is that humans do NOT logically perceive it, despite being *all around us, all being part of a partial perception of the •5D³ being, in 4D², 3D, 2 or • dimensions of existeence.*

As such we humans have a hard time perceiving a full •5D³ being, let alone a simple 4D subject ordering around 3D objects, following the instructions of its holographic 2D mental sheets of information, as its moves in seemingly random lineal point-like cycles of exist¡enœ.

The whole beings in his whole action with his hole information only exists within itself.

How much information of the being we absorb to its stientific description is obviously relative to the mind that perceives it. At least a 5D³ being will need a thorough investigation of it at the three scales ∆º±1 above and below its 0-mind, pov; and through its three topologies of ðime$pace; as it performs its ∆±i ages of exist¡ence.

Existence rquires travels through the scales of the fifth dimension from that seminal to the emergent scales, in an ∆+1 social world back and forth through the eons of zero-sum beings.

As such a supœrganism is always defined from the human point of view of kaleidoscopic perception as a world cycle travelling through a given ∆±i symmetry we ‘perceive’ self-centred in ‘certain singularity-particles’ of certain stiences.

A super organism will be within the ‘limits’ of ∆±3 scales self-centred into the ∆º being (the seminal-world, ∆±1 scales; the energetic, ∆±2 scales, and the informative ∆±3 scales), a knot of Non-Æ flows of energy, information and, entropy, which make the ‘transference of’ motion and form’ between scales, as the being ‘lives’, grows, multiplies and orders a territory.

So each being is a knot-flow focused at ∆º and moving through an St±i ternary scale of stiences.

It is then this ∆º systems what we can study through different stiences and species, as *the fundamental particle of the Universe, which will always follow the same ex i actions, trying to reproduce≈survive its complex ‘information’ as a knot of time-space cycles*.

**Conclusion. The method of study of ∆ST species. **

FROM THE 10Dimensional view the methodology of ∆ST studies becomes a simple routine. Reality is made of space-time beings, which are in full description of all its information a super organism with 3 topological organs in space, which perform 3 temporal functions, symmetric to their form (past-lineal entropy limbs/fields, cyclical informative heads/particles and iterative, hyperbolic wave-bodies). Such is the basis of the generator equation of space-time, which resumes the 3 x 3 symmetries of all beings:

The universe and its Fractal generator can be described as a game of 3 symmetries:

- The simplest symmetry of synchronic 3 topologies of all organs of space.
- The symmetry of those 3 organs in function in time, which dominate each of the 3 ages of life.
- The symmetry along the 5th dimension of ∆-1 parts that become ∆-wholes, emerging into a bigger ∆+1 world, where those 3 organs of space, perform its 3 ages as a world cycle of time, co-existing in 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension.
- Yet when we see the system as a whole, sustained by a O-mind/point of view, we can see the system as a series of smaller cyclical space-time actions that dynamically through those 3 organs in space-time exchange energy and information with other systems, performing a series of actions, which define the nature of the being as an existential discrete function of exchange of energy and information with its ∆+1 world.

It is then clear that the simplest ceteris paribus analysis is that of the 3 organs of space, in a single space-time plane and with a single arrow of time, entropy.

*It is the present understanding of physical sciences, which by the principle of correspondence is the simplest limit of a Universe in which we consider only a single arrow of time, entropy and a single **plane of the 5th dimension.*

Yet, the next degree of understanding of the Universe, is to realise that those 3 organs of space, the lineal, energetic limbs/fields, the informative head/particles and the combined, St(exi) Hyperbolic body-waves, when seeing in motion in each fractal being, determine a relative arrow of time-future, that is a relative path the system will follow. If it uses the limb/field it will increase the overall entropy of the system, if it uses the head/particle it will likely absorb information, and if it uses the wave/body it will reproduce its form as the wave displaces or in the future as the body repeats its energy and information.

So the next symmetry is that of time. And we can build as taoists did, a worldview of reality that includes the organs of space and time ages/cycles of all beings, which tend to be dominated by limbs/fields in its youth, then reproduce and finally exhaust in its 3rd age of information, its energy, warping till they explode back into entropy and die.

But a final symmetry happens when we realise those processes of birth and existence do happen in 3 scales, as we are born as seeds of the lower scale of size, ∆-1, with a faster time clock and then emerge after a long process of reproduction and formal evolution into the ∆-scale, which will be a full being, exchanging energy and information with a larger ∆+1 world. So the 3rd symmetry of reality is that of the planes of existence of the 5th dimension.

The fractal generator:

*∆-1 $pe < ∆OS≈T > ∆+1 Tiƒ*

and its 9=0 symmetries, its 3 topologies in space, 3 ages in time, 3 scales of the ∆-Dimension, resumes the essence of a being, its existence, which consists on tracing world cycles, of 3 ages, as super organisms, of 3 topologies, co-existing in 3 ∆±1, cellular/atomic, thermodynamic-organic, social/gravitational scales. So when we describe any being we depart from its specific fractal generator that explains in detail its 3 organs, 3 ages in time and 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension in which the organism co-exist.

Those 3 symmetries describe all beings in time, space and through its entire existence.

For example, in the PREVIOUS graph, we described the existence of the human being, its parts, organs in space, ages in time, and relationship with its lower and upper scales through actions of energy and information.

The properties of the Universe are thus organic, due to its structure through ∆-scales of size in space and speed of time; self-centred in singularities with an ‘automatic≈survival’ will to act to increase the energy and imprint it with information, to reproduce.

THE GAME IS BIOLOGICAL, organic and darwinian, THE REPRODUCTION AND survival of the singularity and its membrain, which form the topological parts of the being…

But the best strategy is social love and organisation into larger wholes.

But it is also mathematical through its topological ternary design of time-space.

And so we talk of ORGANO-TOPO-LOGICAL SYSTEMS which are also logical and **biological**, which is the word that ‘resumes them all’ and uses all the languages, and gives us more information, as it is closer to us.

THE UNIVERSE IS AN ORGANISM AND WE DO NOT SEE IT AS SUCH EXCEPT IN CLOSE VIEW BECAUSE ORGANISMS ARE THE MORE COMPLEX OF ALL VIEWS, SO WE SIMPLIFY OUR VIEW AS WE GO AWAY FROM THE •MIND.

It is not that only humans and carbon life is organic, it is that ‘the perception by a mind’ of organicism is directly proportional to the quantity of information we can extract from the being, which is directly proportional to the closeness of the being to us.

Hence as we look at far away ‘physical’ or ‘socio-economic’ systems, we simplify them and take enough information about them to the point we let them ‘be’ only material, non-organic, simplex ‘mechanics’.

But they are utmost, linguistic, mental, as they singularity-•minds, do perceive it through all its µotions.

**RECAP. The 5 Dimensions of the Universe.**

The spatial mind stiffens a world of cycles of timespace in motion and scales is to study in separated sections those two sides, we shall call the mind-mirror or monad, and the scalar, cyclical timespace Universe or reality, and consider them equal because that’s *what the humind (ab. human mind) does constantly in all our languages. Of course this is turning the wheel as an ass between what we see, mind space and what there is behind the maya, moving Universes, but it is the best we can do as huminds.*

We shall call the 3 forms of topological space, |. Ø and O, and so as they can be seen as form of space or motion in time, divide also the symbols for time and space in 3 sub-dimensions:

4D: ∇∃ntropy: ∑ð

|-lineal time/space, *closer to entropy*: $, t

Ø-wave time/space: ∫, ∂

ø-cyclical time/space: §, ð

Those are thus the 3+3 evident dimensions of space-time but below and above there are obviously 2 dimensions of larger and smaller scales, which depending on which perspective we take, that of the mind and its wholeness or that of the parts, can be called 4th and 5th dimension, whose obviously symbols are:

5 D: ∆, S: Mind Information, or absolute Space=stillness:

4 D: ∇, ∑ð: invisible motion or pure Entropy, expansion, dissolution in space:

Which are in themselves entire prolongations of reality above and below any entity. So we shall expand the concepts to:

∆-i=∇-i: Entropic lower scales of faster ∑ð-i.

∆+i: Social evolution in supœrgansims with @mind-wholes

Indeed, as Aristotle defined it Time is motion that becomes space, when we see it as a still form. So for each dimension=type of motion=time, we can perceive a dimension of form=space’ as there are 5 type of motions and their symmetric 5 types of form, the Universe have 5 dimensions of time, 5 dimensions of space, and if we combine them, 5 dimensions of space-time.

BUT WHY those dimensions, ∆ and ∇; | and O are inverse? Obviously because time and space are inverse in all forms. And in fact while time, the mind thinks is going to the future IS killing the body and provoking its travel to the past, its entropic death.

So it is the mind that stiffens the body-limbs and forms them which kills and causes the arrow of past-entropy and death but as it feels this is the right think to do to perceive, it is thinking it goes to the future.

This IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PARADOX OF DEATH.