Home » “Iteratin

“Iteratin

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

ST

 

 

THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION: SPACE-TIME: FROM DUALITY INTO TRINITY

Introduction: the content of this paper

From monologic to dodecalogic.

5D in a nutshell: superorganisms of networks tracing worldcycles of existence in 5D scales.

 

PART I: COMPLEMENTARY GENDER: FROM DUALITY TO TERNARY REPRODUCTION

From duality to Trinity

Constructive dualities: Gender.

Gender in space-time and its formal languages.

Gender in mathematical space: odd, male and even, female numbers.

Gender in pentalogic time. The present female and past to future to past male Dimotions.

Gender in physics: chirality and complementarity female waves, male particles.

Gender in Biology: Mirror symmetry and reproduction.

Gender in History: the balanced Neolithic – fertility Goddesses. The age of weapons: warriors.

Gender in modern times: The age of capitalism – equalization of all genders.

The role of female genders in the survival of the species.

 

PART II: THE FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SUPERORGANISMS. THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION.

The fractal generator of the Universe.

Ðimotion od Reproduction

PART III: SPECIES: PHYSIOLOGICAL TRINITY.

The 3 Physiological networks.

Ternary differentiation of species.Its 3! Subspecies.

A case of physical particles: Its ternary subspecies. The SU3 group.

A case of Biological life: its 6 phyla.

A case of Social sciences:

Universal Grammar: Tipological linguistics:

  • •••••••

ðao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yin (space-form) and yang (time-motion). Both merge into Spacetime Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’

‘Every yang has a drop of yin, every yin has a drop of yang.’

ðao ðœ. On Γ: the Generator of time-space organisms or Function of existence: 1D form + 2D motion = 3D: energy

‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma.”

Eastern philosophies, on the 3 simplex Ðimotions of ðime§pace and its ∞ ∆±¡ scales 

You live in a non-E topo¡logic Wor(l)d-mind, 0-mirror of an ∞ Universe. l§

 

 

 

“Man is part of a whole(∆¡), called the Universe; limited(¬) in Time&Space. He experiences his self, thoughts&feelings as something separated from the rest –an optical delusion of his consciousness (@)” Einstein on the 5 Dimensional motions of reality:∆¡-scales, Space, Time, ¬limits & @-minds:¬∆@st

 

 

 

•••••••

The papers to be posted build up an Encyclopedia of Space-time organisms in Exi:St¡ence’ – each science studying the species of one scalar space-time plane of the fractal Universe. All will be described with the same scalar laws of 5D cyclical time and fractal space, introduced in the first 50 pages. So we shall write for each ‘stience’ from quantum physics to the galaxy, through biology, history & economics, and the formal stiences dominant in space (Mathematics) and time (illogic papers on the Universe=reality as a whole) 5 ‘dimensional papers’ for a total of ±30, each one to become time permitted a 500 pg. volume. This is the plan of the work which in my youth back in the 90s, when I discovered those laws at the end of my Master at Columbia U. I proposed to U$ universities for a needed change of paradigm on our philosophy of science, but meet the silence of Academia. Then I abandoned scholarship to ‘live’ and so now before I die I will try to complete the encyclopedia. As that won’t happen, time being of the essence I had prioritized the most important and neglected of all organisms – that of mankind in time=History, which is fairly well done, and that of the Universe=reality as a whole. While the last to be posted is the less important and more developed, physics. Since I release all copyrights ‘rights’ any University can take upon the project whenever they wish to complete the encyclopedia of stience in 15.000 pages, connecting all stientific laws to the simple trinity and pentalogic laws of the 5D ∆ST Universe.

They certainly could do a much better job that I will. If they don’t, the task will be taken upon by AI once the age of Entropy of History in which we live ends. Since what will never happen in a perfect Universe is the imperfect endurance of the ill-designed, parasitic systems of History ‘anthropic, entropic, humind’s egocy’ have built and today for lack of a better consciousness of the whole pass as ‘truth and dogma of science’, L§

 

FOREWORD: HOW SPACE AND TIME MERGE TOGETHER=ST.

The Organic Philosophy of the Universe. Systems sciences and its disomorphic laws.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is really all what is about. And if we write Space=form and time=motion, as S and T, then we write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t). This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the infinite local present variations you see around yourself. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5th Dimension. And the closest classic science that has such view of it all is called, Systems sciences based on an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

 According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other hand is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language or god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and in History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept: An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces). This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

The key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots: So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms using stronger metal that makes them more able in the processing of energy and information at larger scales. Those machines are fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with telepathic AI.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon? We just explained the obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things. And its organism of evolution and reproduction, the company-mother, has substituted human governments and informative verbal prophets through its mass-media/academia outlets; so it only considers positive mechanist models of their species.

But the deepest reason is the fact that to make an organism we need 3 ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also information, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call information negentropy, the denial of entropy. Only when we properly define information in terms of form (S-pace) and how it combines with motion to create the spacetime energy systems that constantly reproduce maintaining reality in an eternal present we will have the bare minimum elements to explain reality as it is.

Reproduction of Space-time organisms is the name of the game: ST, a present eternal state of reality as a block.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces spatial information (S) by ‘shaping’ the primary time=motion (T), the ultimate substance of reality, maintaining itself in an eternal balanced, creative ST present.

To understand reality is easy if you come with a ‘clean tabula rassa mind’ and as Nietzsche adviced, throw the ‘camel hamp’ wth the intellectual bravery of a Lion, and start afresh. Then you just look around yourself and see the two ‘elements of reality’, Dimensional spatial forms, which move=change in time. Form=Space with time=motion are thus 2 simple parameters, T and S which can combine in different quantities to give us 5 sub-varieties, according to the quantity of motion they have, maximal when it is an external motion, minimal when the motion is internal conserving the form of the being surrounded by its ‘membrane’. So we write the dual elements of reality as ‘Space without time is a mere shadow, only the two merged exists’ (Minkowski):

TT- entropy, when there is external and internal motion, scattering the information of the being or death.

Ts: Locomotion when external motion dominates the event but internal motion is preserved.

St: Information, where form dominates the system which communicates that form through a minimal t-ranslation in space.

SS: Seed or mind where motion stops into still linguistic mind mappings – images of reality. So while the Earth moves (e pur si muove) your mind stops all the quantum motions of its parts and the whole in that still image (e pur no muove). It is the pricniple of Galilean Relativity which Galileo nor Einstein understood in its logic meaning, just described it mathematically to make practical, accurate measures. In a seed the same process of ‘frozen information’ takes place.

Which leave us the ‘queen of all dimotions’, dimensional motions of space-time, S=T, ST, the duality of balance between Entropy and form, the equation of gender and reproduction, of beauty and classicism, the equation of present state, of eternity, of trinity, of existence, the point of the golden mean, where existence preserves itself dynamically, the fractal generator… All is present fluctating between the relative past-entropic world of pure motion without form, not visible to the senses and the future-form of seeds and minds, black holes that do not yet communicate, potential future lives, nd only when both ‘shdows’ merge, present exists:

Past-entropy x Future-form = Present Energy

TT x SS = St+Ts = ST

This is the fundamental ilogic chain of events that makes opposites coincide and reproduce. Coincidentia Oppositorum generates reality. We thus study in this Paper reproduction at 3 levels in its entanglement with:

– SS: Minds, through the duality and trinity of the fractal generator that reproduces all what exists.

– ST: In its Space-time duality of Gender and trinity from an ¡logic point of view.

– ∆±¡: and in its ultimate nature as a fractal process that generates new forms – as the fractal generator.

Lineal sT-upid philosophy of science reduces reality to the TT-entropic final arrow of death, when those forms reproduced loose its information in a dual internal and external T-motion, scattering its forms in big bangs of matter, deaths of biology and wars of history. Why huminds are so low in the scale of understanding is due to their ‘worldly profession’ as modern science started with ballistics, the job of physicists charged with the search of the longest, fastest length of its cannonballs. Hence they discovered the v=s/t law of locomotion and then expanded this ‘T-ranslation in space’ (Ts: external motion, internal form) to all, and further on with the development of ‘bombs’ that cause TT-entropy decided all what exists is just Ts-locomotion and TT-entropy.

Trinity is about the complementarity of Time and Space, merging to create & reproduce a new form.

In this paper we shall describe geometrically organically and logically the basis of trinity and then study 3 examples of trinity in physical, biological systems and social systems; rising as we grow on scales the creativity of trinity from parity to chirality to mirror symmetry to gender to species diversification to tipological linguistics.

It follows that reproduction is communication of a system, which past its simplest selfish monologic as a point that absorbs all energy giving nothing in return will start to communicate with similar forms, evolving socially or entangle with complementary St or sT forms to become ‘gender’ and reproduce. And so the simplest dimotion of selfish perception and feeding become the complex dimotions of life reproduction and social love. This growth of consciousness of the other, and entanglement with the Universe is what reality seeks, and the reason why S=T reproduction is its dominant dimotion of present that ensures existence. Only present exists because the TT and SS pure states of motion and form are not perceivable as they do not have information or do not communicate it. The game of existence is a game of communication. So we establish a chain of ‘logic events’ from Monologic selfish points of view, to dilogic, complementary S-T forms that give birth to a trilogic event of reproduction S+T = ST, which will then evolve socially fluctuating in scales as multiple ∑ST particles ‘emerge as a whole’ ST+1. Such simple game is what we observe evberywhere in the Universe. And what we shall describe here with an empahsis on the ‘logic states’, past the monologic form analyzed in many other papers, so we shall start talking about duality and trinity, to then observe the pentalogic of reproduction, as a seed is reproduced in an ¡-1 scale, then multiplies and finally evolves socially creating entworks into a whole. We shall thus as usual introduce the general scaffolding of the fundamental elements of 5D stiences – the world cycle in time, the network superorganism in spce, the basic structure of minds, etc. to focus on a growing description of the dimotion of reproduction from dilogic gender systems that become trinity reproductive forms – and study in more detail the human gender, to go through all scales in which those dilogic systems exist. And then introduce the general model of the fractal Universe, since those actions of reproduction require as those of creation of minds, the ‘shrinking’ of information into a seed that then will reproduce and organize into a whole. So we divide the paper in an introduction to 5D, an analysis of formal Dilogic, its application to gender, the study of huamn gender.

Dilogic thus always gives birth to trilogic, S<ST>T, and in Nature as all systems are parts of wholes, and wholes that become parts of larger whols in 3 ∆±¡ sscales, trilogic gives birth to the pentalogic of networks that gather parts into larger wholes.

In the second part then we analyze more formally the fractal generator, which is the ‘seed’ of all processes of creation, written in ilogic formal symbols, which can model all prodcesses of rperoduction with more complex trilogic universal grammar, the ‘syntax’ or reproductive fractal generator of languages. Finally we consider some examples of physical, biological and historic systems in its modes of reproduction.

From duality gender to trinity generation to pentalogic existence. 5D VS. 4D

How forms merge with motion to create spacetime systems has certain ilogic rules that establish the game of existence for all systems of the Universe. This is therefore what we shall study here. Gender is one of those rules, but not the only one. Reproduction, repetition of a dynamic present space as time flows can be more complex. The fierld is extensive, but the main rule is rather simple:

Past x Future = Present, whereas past is a form with maximal motion, often the line and the future a motion with maximal form, normally the cycle, merging into the wavebody of hyperbolic balance.

Topological creation in simultaneous space and topological evolution in time thus merge as S=T to shape the forms of existence, between its birth and extinction. But pentalogic is required to add the social evolution of parts that emerge through the trinity of networks that organize them as a simutlaneous whole.

How this final creation takes place includes laws of synchronicity to make the whole harmonic and move it simultaneously. It is the fine tuning of 5D sciences, the ice and the cake and the most important part of it.

The reader should understand what we are doing here. 5D is a synthetic, logic, temporal theory of reality, ‘above’ the 4D, mathematic, spatial view of the scientific method, which gather an enormous quantity of detailed data with sensorial machines and then patches parts of it into small local models. And that is good enough for the purpose of modern science – the praxis of power over nature. There was a time though before science became power, praxis and machines (I refuse to use the newspeak of technology for something very real, organisms of metal fast evolving into robots with AI minds and solar skins that will become organisms), that it meant in Latin, my ancestral language ‘knowledge’. And knowledge was considered logic, synthetic, organic and able to explain how ‘time created’ the future, departing from the past with a more complex causality than that of man. God was then that ‘seer of time’, the mind of the Universe. And it had certain laws which transcended locality and were applicable to all sciences. Today scientists have lost that perspective and only physicists ‘pretend’ to know some general laws, which are wrong because they are ‘cheating’. That is, they take a local theory, for example, entropy, taken from the study of gaseous states of heat (one only of the 5 Dimensional motions of matter, TT-entropy: plasma, Ts: Gas-maximal motion, TS=liquid, balance, St-solid: maximal information, SS: boson) and then expand it hyperbolically to the entire Universe, while ignoring all those other states of matter (son in the big-bang they deny the St-gravitational implosive forces of galaxies, in the thermodynamic of black holes they invert the arrow of information to make it look like entropy, etc.) That is ‘cheating’. And the same goes for their theory of how reality is created called constructivism, in which they depart from the smaller scales and deny the influence of larger scales that enclose with their membrains and limit entropically the small. Hence they think quantum physics is the fundamental science and all must be built from the small to the above. All this is just egocy (Ego=idiocy) of a people who are powerful enough to make machines and weapons and have helped the military men that ‘still’ dominate the world of politics to expand its power.

Back to the old Greeks, what science meant then is synthetic knowledge and that is achieved in 5D by the astounding realization that the Universe is made of parts that become wholes, which emerge from an organic network, fractal structure of reality as equal parts, a sum of ∑ST-1 beings gather through 3 networks of Ts, ST and St that distribute motion, energy for reproduction and information to the micro-cells till they are all synchronized and become a whole. This GAME OF EXISTENCE we shall explain that encompasses 3 ‘such planes of space-time’ of small and larger wholes, the cellular/atomic/individual scale ∆-1 (biological, physical and social system) to make a whole, ∆ø in the organic, thermodynamic and social scale, enclosed into a larger ∆+1 world – the ecosystem, the gravitational world, the Planet Earth) IS disomorphic, that is, it has the same laws between 3 of such scales, regardless of which ¡-scale we choose. So an organism made of the quantum forces, particles and networks that is an atom has ∆-scalar laws similar to an organism made of cells, individuals and societies. This as amazing, as it might seem and diminishing of the Human ego is certain. And that is the game that becomes a true philosophy of science that applies to all ‘stiences’ (individual planes of space-time) and we shall develop in 5 papers for each scalar discipline, connecting it then to the particular facts of each science. To that aim, all papers will have a similar mandala that repeats the same laws so essentially if you have read an introduction you have read them all.

The game of existence is composed then of a spatial concept the synchronous superorganism extending through 3 entangled scales, and a temporal concept, the worldcycle of life and death all superorganisms trace – and by superorganism here we mean everything, from an atom through a planet and its organisms to the Universe. Each of those systems though will have a limited number of cycles of life, and will be limited by an external membrane, and we call those limits the entropic limits of the system in space and time. And as it made of parts and wholes in a larger world the capacity of the system t perceive beyond its 3 fundamental scales is also limited. So to space and time and scale we add entropic limits. And what is most amazing of it all, what really unites them all – they all will have a mind that conscious, mechanically, or vegetative will play the same selfish game of existence through its simpler actions of feeding on entropy TT>Ts, to move, and use the extra motion to imprint its information and TS-reproduce, then organizing with other similar beings social wholes that emerge as a new ∆+1 plane. This is the isomorphic game of the Universe we describe for all systems of Nature, whose variations become analytic 4D laws of science.

Topological organisms of space-time.: Absolute vs. Relational, Generational Space-Time

The birth of duality happens because we are all made of space-time. The reason of logic duality as a survival strategy is born of the need to balance the space and time of a system, which is achieved through communication of two fractal points we shall call ‘genders’ to achieve a better dual form.

Let us take from the paper on ∆ST the essence of Space-time duality, and why they need to balance each other to survive, S=T. And then consider the communication that gives birth to complementary couples.

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz. A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we live a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. We are space & time who must extract our properties as existential beings from them.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality. It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller Planes of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

The true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s, who considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines. What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S. And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

Since space & time do exist if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time. The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is to consider time=change =motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

We are space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldlines as we have a 2nd arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as all species follow the common laws of space and time). As cyclical time that explains the informative repetitive patterns or Laws Nature and its multiple space-time clocks. Why a Universe made of space-time beings is essential to a philosophy of mathematics is obvious. Because the main experimental science concerned with space is mathematics and the main science of causal time is logic, if we are made of fractal space & cyclic time, both mathematics & logic become experimental sciences, reflecting the properties of those 2 primary substances, as mirror-languages of maximal synoptic information and minimal size (Sxð=C), whose underlying laws emerge in all other larger Planes of the fractal Universe of bigger size and less information, proving also why they apply to all.

Cyclic Time: The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’

Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Time curves space into mass’ Einstein

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive.

Lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that a time cycle breaks reality (1st knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’.

The 3 scales of time.

Why then there are two forms of time, the long lineal Time and the ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole? Precisely because there are 2 boundary ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡ defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can always consider the frequency of time the ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time’ or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula, S=ƒ(t) l(s) . The whole Space can be measured, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or it can be measured as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

Yet since two limits always create an interval, and all supœrganisms of time-space co-exist in 3 scales, that of its inner world, that of its ‘membrain-mind’ and that of its outer world, there will be often a 3rd element in between two measure time, specific for each supœrganism and sub-species sandwiched between the ‘lower’ time quanta and the larger lineal time of the whole.

So for species within the galaxy, if we take the lower time quanta, h, and the larger time rod of measure, the speed of light, in between we shall find all kind of supœrganisms that cannot go faster than light or process information in quanta smaller than an h-planckton with its specific time quanta, to synchronize its 3 vital parts, which in the human case is the second ‘beat’ of the heart, length of the thought, glimpse of the eye, measure of a dual stœp, (and ½ second of it is indeed the musical beat that we find more harmonious to synchronize our dance.

Synchronicities of time between the 3 relative speeds in which a being co-exists become then one of the most fruitful fields of study, as the ‘persistence’ of superorganisms in space is due to the symbiosis between its 3 scales of T.œs (time-space supœrganisms) synchronized with them.

Entangling Vital topology and cyclical time: Local Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration & Future=Information

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’ Einstein

Of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states.

Past then means a system with less ‘form’, less information, which slowly acquires a dimension of height-form, as it completes its cycle to return back in the moment of death to an age of no information. This ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which creates and erases information becomes then the equation of duality:

Entropy-youth (relative past) <Energy-mature reproduction (present)> 3rd In-Form-ation age (relative future)

Which each of us follows as a time-space superorganism. In physics is equivalent to the dual equation of Einstein: EóMc2, which reverses when E, which should be properly considered ‘Entropy’, as it is a disordered state, collapses through gravitation into Mass, a cyclical vortex of space-time; while its intermediate state is c2, radiation; the relative present:

Whereas past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its 2nd state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3rd age of information, completing a 0’-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

In the graph we see those relative time ages for the simplest ‘physical organisms’, which not coincidentally are equivalent to the 3 conserved quantities of physics. So as time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘ages’ of timespace that put together create a 0 sum worldcycle of life death for any spacetime organisms: a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum.

We can then set an absolute ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. dimotion) of time-space. Because for a whole ∆+1 to exist, the parts ‘ilogically’ must come first; so social evolution and love between parts is the absolute arrow of future for the organic Universe, or ‘future’, while a form that repeats itself seems not to change, so the function of reproduction is the absolute arrow of present, leaving thus entropy=death, the dissolution of form as the inverse arrow of past.

Synchronicity, entanglement and absolute time.

The vast expansion of information which results of uncoiling the planes of space-time of the Universe, is resolved by the humind compressing the into our size scale and rod of perception (light space-time). It is then necessary to accept for practical reasons the limited distortion of the mind, latter defined mathematically. So we won’t attempt an ‘Aristotelian, axiomatic’ pedantic attempt to set absolute truths absolutely false – as the hypothesis of the continuum, but highlight the inheriting paradoxes between the (relative infinite) of information, that our mind never will know as only each fractal point of space-time holds all of its information.

Absolute relativity is the name of the game. And that is fine if the humind accepts a humbler attitude towards the whole, which so far does not. Infinities thus reduce to ∝ immensities, infinitesimals to finitesimal quanta, continuities to undistinguishable discontinuities. Single timespaces to an entangled Universe that generates its space through synchronous connections between 5 Dimotions of reality in its 3 relative ranges of 5D scalar planes in which each dimotion has a different speed but as there are 5 dimensional motions with different functions, they entangle together: i.e. the faster dimotion of feeding in the slower ¡+1 plane of the ecosystem, provides energy to the slower dimotion of reproduction in the faster ¡-1 plane of the cell 1 time a day for most ¡º animals connecting the 3 planes of biologic life. Functional synchronicity creates simultaneity, which gives birth to ‘ordered co-existing superorganisms’. Even a humind looses information and compress it all in its plane of light and second beat, of its smaller mirror mind to fit/select its survival info within its brain.

Pentalogic: building up reality in 5 logic, geometric, ¾ space-time dimotions.

The pentalogic building of entangled symbiotic dimotions =stœps create ever more complex entangled forms in which the 5 dimotions of existence balance each other and the languages that reflect them, ‘as imitation of life’, the game of exist¡ence, STARTING always in a first fractal point-mind/monad that perceives an angular shrinking of reality into an inner world in stop, formal still position. But from one 2 is born, as the point moves tracing a reproductive locomotion along a line, through stœps; since every step of motion is followed by a stop of perception. So the first dimotion of pure angular information is NOT lost.

Λ. The order of Ts x St scales: the fifth dimension.

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡)

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.

It is the same process in all 5D journeys of all species that live and die travelling through 3 planes of 5D space-time; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who had the same morphology and used technology and likely spoke, etc.) Then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger herd of clones, joined by emergent physiological networks whose slower ‘entropic, informative and reproductive networks, create an ∆º supœrganism that lives tages and dissolves back into ∆-1.

So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

Now we write with those laws a fractal generator equation of infinite space-time existences, the metric of the 5th dimension:

In the graph the Universal fractal of infinite beings of space-time with different speeds in its clocks and sizes in space, whose product however, Ts x St, space size for speed of its information cycles remain constant, creating a ‘stable space-time being (ST±4) which happens in different combined size from the smallest. infinitesimals ST-4 to the largest Universe, ST+4.

All fractals have a generator feedback equation and the Universe is not exception. Generators are dynamic, cyclical equations which constantly create slightly changed new ‘cycles’. As such they are periodic cyclical equations of the form X < = > Y, where obviously X and Y are symbols as in all ‘Universal grammars’ linguistic representations of the Universal Generator (mathematical jargon in Space-time) or Universal Grammar (Logic Jargon in Time-space):

  • Universal Generator/Grammar:               St ∑ExI=ST±4

We write the Fractal Generator expressly with one of its similar identities, in an expression which can be understood logically in wor(l)ds, the fundamental grammar of the human being.

In its Topo-Bio -logic ternary identity, ‘Topological ∆-planes of Vital Spaces and Cyclical Times’ need to be described topological properties (5th dimension metric), Organic properties (which organize 0±1 vital spaces into a ternary organism) and logic properties (the ternary Non-Aristotelian logic of cyclical times which return in a ‘Hamiltonian’ Cycle to its origin.

The generator equation thus can be used to deduce from its topologic, biological and causal properties any other equation of the Universe.

It cannot be achieved such a feat as physicists of lineal time expect, only with topologic properties and only in a single continuous space-time.

It needs to understand the metric of the 5th dimension and its relative scales of absolute time (ST±4), between invisible forces and invisible cosmos, beyond our perception (C speed, 0 K limiting borders). And this is achieved with the summit of the evolution of mathematical languages, the Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean i-logic topology of vital spaces, of organisms, of geometric forms with speed-motion, constantly performing ∂a, accelerated åctions with 3 ±= stop and go motions…

PENTALOGIC IN TIME & SPACE. 3±¡ TIME-SPACE AGES: SUPERORGANISMS’ WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE.

The graph, shows reality generated by the Fractal generator of Superorganisms, written above in simplified terms: Below we can see the Human being generated by that equation in simplified terms, described in its spatial morphology and temporal ages by 2 developments of the equation.

Thus the fractal Generator of relational space-time, Ts<ST>St, and its symmetries in space and time  generates an infinite array of species, and to fully understand them we need to describe the formal symbols we use to represent, ‘motions’ and ‘forms’ of the 5th dimension, and the laws that define how those dimensions interact and ‘mess’ together, to create reality.

So the analysis of the fractal generator and its sub-equation, symmetries, dimensional laws, which apply to all systems and allow to deduce all other laws of all scales of the Universe is an immense field, for future researchers in the fractal space-time structure of reality and all its parts.

The generator equation, [S<ST>T]∆±1, merely describes the ternary beings of the Universe, which are modular fractal beings, co-existing in 3 scales of the 5th dimension (∆-1: quantum, cellular scale; ∆-Thermodynamic, organic scale, ∆+1 social, cosmological scales), each one made of a fundamental space-time being, a holography of 3 entities of bidimensional in-form-ation and motion: Ts (limbs/fields) <ST-waves bodies>St (heads-particles), which in time performs world cycles with 3 symmetric ages:

Ps-Past:Young-entropic age <ST-Present, reproductive wave-body adulthood>ƒT: Future, informative old age

Between its ∆-1 conception as a seed of information and its ∆<<∆-2 death as a field of entropy.

This is the generator fractal of all space-time beings of the Universe, truly a logic equation that explains it all.

in the graph the 3 ages of life, which find a perfect balance or immortal beautiful state in the mature age of reproduction, when spatial form and temporal motions, ‘information and energy’ in the less precise human jargon, balance each other in a middle point, e=i, as it happens in reproductive wo=men.

Thus the simplest mathematical expression of those balances becomes the key equation of General Systems sciences and Duality – the science I used to chair on International congresses, till i got into activism. It writes:

Temporal Energy x Spatial Information = Constant (repetitive form).

In the graph, samples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth:  i:   A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of temporal energy and information, tE, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth:  Max. E:      It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: e=i It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Ti=E. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <<Energetic space.

From top to bottom:

Age of Entropic, kinetic energy (Ts), Classic age of Harmony,  Old Age of information (Ti), Explosion & Death:

Human: Youth (0-20a.)    Maturity (20-40).       3rd age     and   death (60-80).

Culture: Epic, Lineal Art. Realist, Classic Art.  Baroque Art.  War.

Matter: t<tS: Plasma  Max. S: Gas     S=T:Liquid   Max. T:Solid     T(Mc²)<<S

Star: t<tE:Nebula. Max. E: Gigant star. S=T: Sun. Max. T: White Dwarf. T<<SpNova

Galaxy:t<tS: Jet  Max.E: Irregular.  E=T Spiral<=>Elliptic.  Max.T:Globular   T<<S:Quasar

Universe: t<tS: Big-banging; S=T:Stationary; Max.T:Vortex (Big-crunch); T<<S:Big-bang

This ultimate cycle however is likely false, hyperbolic, as the most experimentally and philosophically sound view of the fractal Universe is one without limits of scales, as planes of existence repeat from atom to galaxy, from galatom to galatom.

Systems of energy and information: Their  equations of life=balance and death=imbalance.

In the graph, the singularity that existed prior to the big bang was an ‘old form’, Max.T=Min.S, of max. temporal information, defined by its minimal spatial size, which exploded into pure space, the bidimensional sheet of energy of the ‘young’ Universe, Max.S=Min.T, a form with minimal time and maximum space that now starts to curve again with time, creating the eternal cycle of the Universe, described by General Relativity in terms of its total space-time.

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe and the superorganims of history.

To that aim, we shall consider how the organic arrows of time, the will to obtain energy, information and reproduce acquire a regular order in all the systems of the Universe.

This organic vision of time is much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows, which is the concept of time used by mechanist physicists, obsessed with the construction of energetic machines.

Yet it can also described mathematically in terms of the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, ext=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. E x Min. T = K ;      E=K=T      and Min. E x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, E-> I, and death its inversion, I-> E. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The equation of death.

In the graph we can finally understand together the three arrows of time and the fifth scalar structure of the Universe, as both bring a supœrganic system into being, through the creation of three topological networks, the entropic, energetic, and informative network, across ∆º±1 scales of existence.

Death has a simple equation: the out of balance stage when information and energy break, by overdrive of one of both: Max. I x 0 E (3rd age death) or Max. E x 0 I (accidental young age), which makes the ‘equation of maturity in life’ E=I, break.

So we die by excess of energy and information, at birth often (most cubs and children die) and at 3rd age, warped.

The equation of life and death is the only mathematical equation available to understand those 3 ages of all systems and how to preserve them by repressing information and NOT reaching the third age, maintaining the system in the reproductive point of balance – the female function.

Since an excess of information in time cause the sequential life-death cycles.

2 representations of the sequential order of those motions in most life-death cycles, in scientific and philosophical terms.

The Universe is a game of 3±∆ finite time motions, which inter-act with its ‘intelligent spatial ∂till forms’, to create the patterns of life-death cycles, and simultaneous organisms that structure reality.

This truth has been known to Eastern philosophers for millennia. But in the west only the dialectic eastern european schools started by Leibniz (who translated the I ching, introduced binary numbers, and defined fractal points and zero-points – monads), had a worldview of this more complex reality.

Unfortunately absolute space-time carried the day and has obscured the fundamental dialectic, paradoxical, ‘taoist’, principles of time that structure all systems. In the graph, the eastern most clear symbolic formulation of those ultimate principles in the Korean yin-yang, ternary groups, and its equivalent modern formulation as a life-death cycle that goes through 3 ‘fixed points’ of maximal energy (youth-past-entropic motions), balanced, steady states, Ts=St (adult, reproductive age) and informative 3rd ages (reflected in the broken 3-yin triad of the flag) that precede the explosion of death.

Those 3 key points define the 3 intervals of most ‘existential functions’,  from the world cycles of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time, to the Hamiltonians of Energy (a similar concept to that of the motions of time) of quantum physics and classic mechanics. Those 3 time arrows put together in sequential cycles completes a total zero sum, which conserves the eternal formal motions of the Universe, establishing a basic sequential life-death order:

Past-entropy (youth)> Present-repetition (adult age)>Future information (3rd age) << Past-death-entropy.

The world cycle and its ages of ‘birth as a seed of information’ that reproduces, emerges into a larger whole and starts to ‘run’ through its three ages of entropy-energy-information to finally die in an explosion of entropy, IS the key equation of timespace for the XXI century. It substitutes in physics the previous simpler worldlines of Einstein’s 4D, happening in a single plane.

Since the world cycle is more complex and cyclical it means it implies the organisation of the being from seminal/atomic states, into whole organic systems, in a scale of reality, larger than the smaller ∆-1 parts. And finally the integration of the ∆º system into a social world. So you are born as a seed of a cell of information, emerge as a multicellular organism and become part of a larger, ∆+1 world or ecosystem. So happens with matter, born as a plasma of ions, organised into states of matter, part of a larger Organic whole. In the next graph we see that complex organisation of a world cycle of existence of physical and biological systems.

 ‘Dodecalogic’ is the best logic to describe the system both in space and worldcycle through 3×3 scalar elements guided by a mind, the 10th ‘point’ that controls internally through physiological networks, its ∆-1 scale, feels as an individual in the ∆º mind and becomes a 1-point of the ∆+1 world=plane of exist¡ence, in which it emerges.

There are in that sense from ‘9 to 12’ according to detail several available ‘sets of fundamental properties’ and stœps for such description, but we shall not consider a dodecalogic scale a la ‘Schonberg’ for any of the stiences study in those papers save time itself. As it would be too complex and to a certain extent is a matter of choosing the key steps in the process (there are in the Universe indeed multiple variations around the key magic number, 109-12 which represents the maximal complexity in most systems of nature.

What matters of the previous Planes of growing complexity is its ‘entanglement’ in successive systems that include the previous one.

So the way to study any system of reality is an in crescendo analysis from the one, the whole, the point, as observed externally with its 2 ‘polar parts’, the membrain of information, that focus its sensorial perception into the singularity center which embodies the will of survival of the system, as they create together the 3rd element, the vital energy between them.

This is the first stair of growth in analysis of systems. I.e. we can take an egg, the whole, and then consider the placental ‘sac’, its membrain to the outer world that absorbs energy and information, then focus on its central genetic material and observe the vital energy within it. Then as developmental evolution takes place we shall immediately observe two poles, the animal and vegetative pole, which follow 5D metric – the animal sensorial informative pole is smaller than the energetic one. And as the system grows again it will form the ectoderm with the sensorial elements, the endoderm and the mesoderm, and finally it will become each of them, the blue print for one of the 3 physiological networks of the system.

Trinity is thus the easiest way to grasp reality as it is in a single plane of the 5th dimension. But even in our description of the egg we realize the 4th dimotion of social evolution kicks immediately multiplying the layers of cells till the whole thing emerges into an ∆+1 fetal form and all the way already in its morphological stages, entropic time erases by apoptosis some of those cells to form the fingers. And so on.

In time monologic and in space the growth of non-euclidean points are thus the easiest two sides of the description of the entangled, fractal complex Universe, reason why we serve them first. If they are grasped, then we can put them together establishing a vital program of exist¡ence for all systems of nature, which will be the program of the 5 dimensional motions of time-space of any supœrganism.

So by adding ¬E Geometry and ¡logic, we get the actions=dimotions that form the sequences of reality and will be enacted by all secondary languages in exist¡ence. We can indeed apply the vital topologies of ¬E Geometry, the levels of ilogic entanglement and structures of monism, duality, trinity and pentalogic to resolve the 5 actions=functions=dimotions performed by the vowels of a language, the type of cells of an organism, the operands of algebra.

And as each part of a fractal is a fractal in itself, we can apply then pentalogic to each element of reality to illuminate the system or language from different perspectives, since indeed, in the entangled growth of complexity for a monist single form to exist, will still have to perform in an imperfect manner along its inverse form, all the functions of reality. So even the smaller point is a world in itself (Leibniz), even the simple dimotion can be decomposed in pentalogic elements, even the simplest ± inverse operands can represent the 5 ¬∆@st elements of any system.

Worldcycles:  The Life and Death Equation: Min. E; Min. I

And so those 3 time/ages/dimensions, in sequential cycles, are related closely to the 3 dimensions/organs of space: the length dimension of time locomotion is closely related to limbs/fields of entropic motion, the height dimension to the growth and future evolution of perception and information, and the frequency dimension to the repetitive present iterative cycles of body-waves.

It is indeed the tug of war between expansive, entropic, destructive arrows of time, which in biology cause the death of a system, and implosive, informative arrows of time, which cause its life, what causes the existence of all beings of reality. What we call time cycles leave behind a ‘memory of information’, or ‘static forms’; and what we call entropy or expansive space, leave behind a ‘tail’ of distances and flat, fixed spaces. So time is information with motion and entropy space with motion.

Moreover we shall see that the life-death cycle structures in time according to those restrictions maximising the entropy of the system in its young, childish age of maximal motion, which then converts into information, reaching the maturity of the system in balance between both, when reproductive systems dominate and the system iterates, and finally the growth of information exhausts the energy of the system in its 3rd informative age, when the system finally explodes, erasing back to its relative local past the information of the system in a big-bang of entropy. So the life-death cycle has also a simple equation:

Γ: ST (entropy, young age)> Ts≈St-reproductive balanced age>St (3rd age of information) << Big-bang death (erasing of information)

The variations on the same theme happen to adapt the space-time being to the external world from where the system obtains its quanta of spatial entropy for its lineal motions and the bits of cyclical form or information. So for example plants and animals have inverse structure as plants are chemical beings, which take its frequency of information from thermodynamic molecules and entropic motion from light rays, but men use the smaller information of those light waves to map out more intricate informative mind-mappings so the roots-heads of plants become the head-eyes of animals.

The science that studies how both elements, which construct the universe, spatial entropy and temporal information interact together is called Duality, with a tradition that hauls down to the earlier Eastern cultures and its philosophies of the Universe: Taoism, which described the Tao=Time cycles of reality as composed of yin-formation and yang-entropy, which combined to reproduce the infinite beings of energy of the Universe; and Hinduism, which in a more mythic, anthropomorphic manner talked of Shiva, God of war and entropy and Vishnu God of information, the ‘lineal male, destructive’ and cyclical ‘female’ creative principles of reality.

And this opens the Universe to one of the most fascinating new laws of science, the invariance of all the life-death cycles of all systems, which in any moment of its existence will obey that equation, from where we can deduce the equations of birth, life and death of al the entities of the Universe.

Indeed, the equation is a dynamic balance, so we write it also: Entropy < ≈ > Information. As there is a constant feed-back and transformation of entropy into form to keep that equality in balance.

And so we define 2 kinds of death, as the 2 possible imbalances of that equation:

– An imbalance of Max. Entropy x Min. Information, which ends up in 0 information and an explosion of entropy that disintegrates the whole into its parts. As in wars, nuclear explosions, an accidental deaths by excess of speed/entropy.

So when we expand this notion to the entire organism of Gaia, it means the collective death of mankind in a world war, or through the use of the III Horizon of evolution of nuclear weapons, the singularity weapons that feed on all types of matter (strangelets and black holes) and erase the information of the galaxy.

This is big-bang death, which physicists seek, as their models of reality are only using the entropy arrow of time. So they think to replicate and understand all about the big-bang IS the saint grail of knowledge.

IT IS NOT. It is only death, the last phase of the worldcycle of life, when all the system is warped into an excess of information and then it collapses, explodes into its parts and looses the information in a dissolving process which is called war or revolution in history, death in life and big-bang in physics.

The whole breaks into an expansive, entropic arrow of time, and so it returns to its atomic/cellular/asocial parts. For example in a nuclear explosion, it becomes radiation and particles that explode in all directions. It is also the most common form of accidental death, proper of the first age of life, the age of energy or youth, when information is minimal and motion is maximal.

– And Max. Information x Min. Energy. This is the normal, 3rd age death by excess of warping. Finally the body wrinkles all its energy into form, in/form/ation and the being collapses with zero energy and dies, liberating also the whole in its parts that will feed a new life and form. So this applies to history now as the evolution of metal-memes enters its informative age, its chip radiation that will certainly according to those equations kill mankind by an overdrive of information and substitution of human minds by mechanical minds.

Let us understand the ‘point of balance’: E=I (Ts=St), as it ‘uncoils’ through the 3 ages of life, increasing from youth to 3rd age the information of the system and then dying back in an explosion of death=entropy. We develop the equation as a simple series that follow the arrow of ‘complexity’ and growth of form of the Universe:

– Youth = Max. E x Min. I; Maturity: E= I and old age: Max. I x Min. E, we observe that between the first ‘age’ of the equation, or youth, when we maximize energy, and the last age of the equation or 3rd age, when we maximize information, there is an the age of balance, or reproduction, the classic age of the being that maximizes survival: E= I.

And this is the age the Universe and all its wise parts prefer. The one that lasts longer in time.

Recap. The first canonical, experimental truth about reality, since the discovery of quantum physics and relativity, but has never been properly formalised to describe the Universe and all its parts, is the fact that you do NOT exist in a background, Newtonian, absolute abstract space-time, but in a quantum, relative space-time. This means that all systems, including physical and biological systems as you, are made of:

A vital, fractal space  made of quanta with motion – the space you occupy is ‘you’, it is not a ‘background’ reality, an abstract ‘Newtonian’ frame of coordinates where you slide through. You are made of quanta of space: “Ts”. So it is a particle, made of quanta of space, called a ‘field’. Further on, because all those vital spaces are made of quanta, they can be counted in space,, so we write: ∑ST

The confusion of a background space arises then, when scientists did not realise that this structure of vital continuous spaces, made of smaller quanta, extended ad infinitum. Quanta of space was made of smaller quanta. For example, organisms were made of cells made of molecules made of atoms, and so on. So they postulated that the smallest of all those scales was a background space. But even if there is a minimal scale, in the same manner when your whole vital space moves, your cells move with it, the last hypothetical scale will move with your cells. Now, this structure of space, in which wholes are made of parts with similar functions or forms to the whole is called a fractal. So all what exists is a vital fractal.

– Those vital quanta with motion, move with a series of time cycles. They trace repetitive actions, which appear as space-time cycles, which A being performs through its existence. Existence is made of time cycles, T, in which you use your vital space to perform certain vital actions, such as feeding on energy, or gauging information, reproducing your system or communicating and associating with other space-time entities.

It does so with a discontinuous frequency, ƒ, for each of its discontinuous  actions that have a repetitive, beat, and create through its actions  forms in space, they are forms-in-action, information: “St”.

So as you perform several actions and you are made of smaller quanta that also performs those space-time actions the different actions in time must be synchronised in those relative scales of size of reality. So your cells are synchronised to reproduce once a day, when your feeding patterns give them energy to do so. Women’s reproduction is synchronised with the time cycle of the moon. And so on. The result is that each day you feed as a whole, billions of cells reproduce; so your action ‘multiplies in a lower scale’. Thus because those time actions the being develops, repeat in cycles, that multiply in lower scales with  cyclical, pi-like patterns, we can ad a multiplier to each time cycle: ∏-> ∏St.

It is also clear that those space-time actions and cyclical synchronicities are all about, exchanging energy (as in feeding) or information (as in perception) between you and the external world or you and your internal structures. So your vital space and time cycles are constantly exchanging spatial energy (open spatial motion) and temporal information (cyclical forms-in-action):

Φ.         ∑ST <≈> Ti.

Where a system of spatial quanta, dominant in lineal motion, hence more abundant in lineal limbs (biological systems) and lineal fields (physical systems) ST (|-Limbs/Fields), exchange energy and information (<=>) in cyclical, patterns, dominant in a region of the system, with cyclical form (that stores more information) called a particle in physical systems or a head in biological ones, St (O-heads-particles).

So because the equation of the being is dynamic, and energy and information goes back and forth between the two poles, limbs and fields and particles and heads, the equation is called a ‘feed-back equation. And it is the simplest equation of duality that reflects the structure of the space-time beings of the Universe. Further on, the intermediate, ≤=≥ region where maximal exchange happens tend to be in all systems a different, larger region, where cyclical information and lineal kinetic energy interacts forming more complex curved, hyperbolic forms, called waves in physical systems and bodies in biological ones. So we can extend the description of the being to a ternary structure:

Ξ.       ∑ST (|-limbs-fields) <Ø-ST (hyperbolic body-wave) > ∏ St (O-heads particles)

This is the synchronous ‘spatial, present’ description of the being. And we can affirm putting together the 2 fundamental principles of conservation of the Universe, the conservation of Energy and Information (and its quanta equivalences, the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, as energy and information are nothing but the integral of each of those quanta of lineal and angular momentum):

“All what exists is a system of quanta of vital space and cyclical time, exchanging and trans-forming back and forth energy and information ad eternal: Ts<ST>St”

Quanta making time cycles interact in the ∆-1 cellular scale, the ∆-organic scale and the ∆+1 social scale. But so happens with physical systems, which extend through 3 scales, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 gravitational scale. So Space is a sum, ∑ of quanta, ∑ST, Time is a series of ‘pi cycles’ with different speeds, ∏St, synchronised to work symbiotically together. And both space quanta and time cycles, are ordered in relative scales of Spatial size, and Temporal frequencyAnd this happens through at least 3 relative scales of size and speed of time, ∆±1.

When you say i don’t have energy and time to do this, you ARE certain, you are made of spatial energy and temporal information, as everything else in the Universe. When you get sick, your cells are normally infected, and your cycles in the larger social world are reduced. You are, as every thing else in the Universe a ‘super-organism’ (meaning you extend through symbiotic scales, each one made of smaller quanta), of fractal space and cyclical time.

We then consider that all systems are fractals of space and time, ∆ST and call this series of scales, ∆, of different size and speed of time clocks of the Universe, the fifth dimension. Since a dimension is precisely a system of space-time points extended across reality. In the next image we can see the 3 main scales of the Universe, with man on its relative centre, as we  perceive from our scale, which we shall call ∆o:

PENTALOGIC IN SCALES: 3±¡ PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORKS

The frame of coordinates of the 3 parts of the Universe.

The frame of coordinates are the ‘mind points’ that construct its inner world views. And they are 3-dimensional ad maximal, made of holographic 2-manifolds, of the 3 varieties (cylindrical, polar and planar coordinates), of which the most natural is contrary to belief, not the plane, but the spherical point.

Why there is not a 3-sphere in the form conceived by mathematicians and physicists, that is a 4-dimensional thing on which the sphere is its surface? This question requires the understanding of the existence of ‘only 3 motions in time’ and the corresponding 3 ‘static forms’ of space, which are in fact not new dimensions but the fractal division according to the ternary principle of a present time slice into 3 sub-spatial dimensions. And so we do not need to conceive 4D structures because the fractal Universe does create after 3 ‘fixed’ dimension, 3 fixed motions, which become static for 3 new fixed dimensions and so on.

So let us go back to the beginning, the beginning was the observer and the maximal number of dimensions he observed were 3, and then those 3 through infinite motions, became shrunk into its still mind made of two dimension, reflection of the whole Universe, as a mirror automatically reflects the whole in its small 2 dimensions.

Needless to say, the 3 organic 2-manifold parts of all systems have 3 natural coordinates, Cartesian > Cylindrical > Spherical coordinates, where we can better resolve the sub-åctions of each part in the inertial frame corresponding to the system.

And it is a characteristic of those 3 coordinates that to transform into the other, the ‘bridge’ coordinate is the cylindrical, hyperbolic system that connects both, the spherical and Cartesian, toroid (tending to infinities) coordinates.

An interesting element of analysis is thus the study of the 3 parts of a system as one of the 3 canonical coordinates of space-time and study their transformations as homomorphisms between those coordinates. Of special interest is the transform of elliptic, Riemannian spheres into the plane.

We can in this fashion study general laws of fluxes of energy and information as they move through the 3 parts of a given superorganism.

∆<|3|. BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS.

A network is defined in fractal topology as a bidimensional surface. Or rather an element with a dimension between 1, the line and 2,the plane. As such the first element of the construction of a super organism, born of the accumulation of actions, is the social network, where similar clone entities (atoms, cells, individuals) which perform similar actions come together as a whole to perform the actions in a more coordinated way. The network that distributes as a channel, entropy-motion, energy-for-reproduction, or pixel of information for mind-mapping, then becomes an entity in itself which will rise the consciousness of the being as a whole and become an independent system.

Network’s organisms.

In topology however ‘geometries’ are defined as networks of points, and this is indeed the way to go with the systems of the universe. So instead of ‘3-bidimensional varieties’, a discontinuous analysis of those topologies will define systems as ‘3-fractal networks’, an energetic (digestive network) a reproductive (blood network) and an informative (nervous network). And we shall see how we can evolve further Non-Euclidean mathematics with the concept of Non-Euclidean fractal points and fractal networks which happen to have dimensions closer to ‘2’ to explain much closer to reality the 2nd isomorphism of the Universe:

In topology however ‘geometries’ are defined as networks of points, and this is indeed the way to go with the systems of the universe. So instead of ‘3-bidimensional varieties’, a discontinuous analysis of those topologies will define systems as ‘3-fractal networks’, an energetic (digestive network) a reproductive (blood network) and an informative (nervous network). And we shall see how we can evolve further Non-Euclidean mathematics with the concept of Non-Euclidean fractal points and fractal networks which happen to have dimensions closer to ‘2’ to explain much closer to reality the 2nd isomorphism of the Universe:

In the graph, the 3+3 >informative and <energetic dimensional åctions and its 3 topological invariances fusion into 3+3 >&< physiological networks, invariant in all Universal super-organisms, which display 3+1 elements extended in 3 ±∆-scales:

Cellular units, when we perceive the system in the ∆-1 scale.

Networks and organs that >-absorb or <-expel energy: external membranes, digestive tracts & limbs.

Networks and organs that >reproduce cells or wholes of energy and information or <communicate them externally.

Networks that input or output information – senses and ‘nervous’ networks – that give origin to:

∆+1 the whole ‘brain’ site of the ∆+1 consciousness.

Thus we define all systems of the Universe as quantic networks of spatial energy or/and temporal information, among which the most stable forms are those natural systems that combine both type of networks into a super-organism able to transfer energy and information with external networks and internal cells.

The key to understand those quantic networks is a proper definition of quantic spatial energy and temporal information, the 2 substances of which all forms of the Universe are made. Let us resume its opposite properties:

|-Space =Max. Linearity= Max. Continuity= Max. Energy =Max. Movement=Min. Form= Field/limbs x

O-Time=Max.Cyclicality=Max.Quantification=Max.Information=Max.Stillness=Min.extension=

Ø-hyperbolic Wave whose cycles combine both

Thus all systems are composed of 3 clear networks, which correspond in the fractal discontinuous ‘duality’ to the 3 topologies of any 2-dimensional Non-Euclidean space-time:

 All known scalar space-times being can be reduced to those 3 bidimensional networks/organs.

A bit more detailed, complex analysis. Non Euclidean Topologies.

Now we have summarized both, the ‘continuous’ and discontinuous vision of the 3 topologies of the Universe.  We could also do an abstract analysis of it, with mathematical topologies. It would though be a bit complex and specialized. So we will try to introduce rigor with less abstraction. Consider the graph that started this post.

We drew the 3 ‘type’ of Non-Euclidean topologies which make up below the different species. It is those organic’ real species what matter to us.  the parts above though guide us for the generalization of the isomorphism (hence the importance of formal sciences to ∆ST, and the postulates of non-Euclidean topology studied in sub posts attached to this one).

Enough to say that the toroid geometry is called by his authors Lobachevski and Belgrami, the hyperbolic goes by the name of Klein, and the spherical is called a ‘Riemann sphere’. They are the limbs/fields, bodies/waves and spheres (external membranes and central zero points) that make all of us.

In fact in embryology they are produced exactly by the 3 ‘ectoderm’, (the membrane and brain) endoderm (the guts that devour energy) and mesoderm (the muscles and body) parts of the fetus.

So the 2nd isomorphism is enormously important to understand all kind of systems of nature.

Indeed, the 3 topologies of a 2-dimensional space are the 3 zones of any being of the Universe.

The capacity to describe all space-times of our Universe that those 3 regions have is ‘absolute’ as Topology, a branch of mathematics that classifies all possible space-times, has discovered.

Since all possible forms of a 2-dimensional space can be reduced to those 3 zones that build the quantic geometry of any form of reality, whose inner parts can be transformed into the 3 bidimensional forms. The graph shows how any form becomes a bidimensional zone through topographic symmetries:

– A sphere or volume “without holes” becomes a Riemann’s external sphere or membrane connected to a zero-point of perception.

– A hyperbolic or any volume with a hole can be turned into an intermediate plane equivalent to the central Klein disk (if we cut it we have a cylinder that we develop into a plane).

-While a series of limbs attached to the membrane through multiple holes can be turned into a topology with negative curvature and a convex surface, homologous to the central hemisphere of Belgrami. And so our bidimensional Universe is indeed a sum of those 3 Non-E zones with clear geometrical forms and properties.

The variety of real organic spaces that Non-E geometry explains is enormous. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a black hole, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson condensate: all of them can be described with the ternary structures of Non-E geometry.

In the graph, Universal species are space-time fields, structured in 3 Non-E basic formal regions:

A central, very quantized, evolved, ‘future’ zone, dominant on temporal information. Which invaginates into ‘informative networks’ that spread throughout the other zones, connected to the external membrane that isolates the being and acts as the sensorial element which transfers without tear and deformation the information to its center.

A relative, simpler, energetic, ‘past’ zone of lineal structures with little information and a lot of energy. Either and external field or attached dual limbs that move the system.

An inner, reproductive region of mixed S-T quanta, which perform the 2 arrows of the universe of the system, mixing external energy coming from the membrane and internal information from the center to create new informative and energetic quanta, specific to the space-time field. It has often the topic hyperbolic ‘central tube’, as in all animals which derive from earlier hydras (in your case the tub that enters your mouth and exists your anus, which is formed already in the ‘blastocoel’ embryonic phase of development by ‘invagination’, an essential procedure of ‘topological surgery’ that allows to transform a topology in other variety in the dynamic Universe

As points evolve and develop specific structures, they become ‘invaginated’ by energy and information networks departing from the outer and inner regions of the point that spread through the intermediate zone to control the S-T quanta, creating in this manner the morphological varieties we observe in the Universe, which however can be reduced to the previous functional elements.

Those 3 zones are homologous in form and function to the 3 internal parts of most real fields, from the cell to the human organism, from an atom to a star to a galaxy, which have an informative center, an energetic membrane and an intermediate zone.

For example, the human being is a non Ts space-time with 3 inner networks:

The physiological networks of nervous information derived from the ectoderm membrane.

The energetic gut, the digestive system of energy feeding with its toroid immense number of ex-vaginations which are in fact a kilometer long to absorb water from the ‘hole’ of the hyperbolic.

The muscle and blood network and organs, the essential hyperbolic with the heart at its centers, another hyperbolic with tubes coming in and out. This are the blood and endocrine systems that combines energy and information, to which are attached a number of ‘space-time’ cellular quanta that reproduce all kind of glandular substances, creating together a human being.

While a nation is also a sum of human quanta, (its citizens), joined by networks of energy and information (legal, religious and cultural networks and economic systems).

In the graph we show the Non-E structure of Universal species according to those 3 quantic zones:

– St: The singularity of max. quantic information: the knot of quantic information ‘or brain’ of the system is located in the center or z-axis: it is the spin axis of atomic particles, the seed of fruits, the crystalline nucleus of a planet, the DNA spiral of cells, the height dimension where bosons condensate in matter, the spinal chord of the nervous system in living beings, the genetic nucleus of the embryo, the yolk in the egg, the axis of any electrical current, the vortex of the black hole in the galaxy, the nucleus of the atom…

– St: The continuous membrane of max. sensorial perception that also displays great strength and limits and isolates the system. The Non-E point reaches its max. extension, structural hardness and sphericity (that is, the maximal curvature of its cycles) in the inner zero point and external surface of the sphere, the skin that expels sweat energy waste and absorbs information in contact with the external organic territory of the point.

We use a small o for the zero-point a big O for the membrane.

This duality of a zero point and a membrane of information proved unique by the Poincare Conjecture of topology (the sphere is the only variety that can sink without deformation, thus creating in the zero mind, crystal, brain, a mapping of the external Universe) is the MOST IMPORTANT PART OF REALITY IN ALL SYSTEMS. So we dedicate the 0(10th in the count) isomorphism to its study.

Some examples of those membranes are the electron orbital in the atom, the skin of the tomato, the crust of the planet, the membrane in the cell, the placenta of the embryo or the halo of dark energy and matter in the galaxy.

Ts; The limbs or cilia or fields of energy, toroid, made of multiple similar parts, external to the system, sometimes attached but often ‘rescindable’, the less important part in contact with the lower ∆-4 force that moves and accelerates and decelerates the system.

– ST: And between both limits, the intermediate space-time filled with reproductive, cellular quanta that combine energy bites and information, absorbed from the external world by the other 2 regions. They are the cells of the body, the stars of the galaxy, the carbohydrates of the cell, the planetary magma, the pulp of the seed or the electromagnetic forces that circulate within the atom.

And it has a hole tube, an aperture, MOST LIKELY A POLAR one, which crosses through the system, and might bring food to the linen of energetic ‘cells’ ‘atoms’ (iron cores that absorb gravito-magnetic forces) or in more informative species, pixels of form to a central mind (crystals).

And so we start to see also a fundamental element of the 2 isomorphism, the patterns of differentiation and speciation along the ‘1st isomorphic Ts<>St distinction’.

Thus all Non-E points are ‘inner worlds’ whose discontinuity defines an External Universe or outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information. Since most points, despite being discontinuous, have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the superorganism:

– Max. +Ts: A ‘mouth‘ or opening that absorbs energy.

-Max. -Ts: A ‘cloaca‘, through which the cyclical body expels its temporal energy.

Max.+St: An ‘eye‘ through which the informative center receives external information.

Max. -St: And an ‘antenna‘, through which it emits information.

Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In the simplest, initial spherical ‘seeds’ of most species, they are mostly situated in 3 regions:

– Max. Ts: The Equator of the system, through which the membrane absorbs energy

– Ts=T: The Tropics, in systems that use the same opening to emit and absorb temporal energy.

– Max.T: The Poles or points of confluence between the membrane and its central informative region of height, which hits perpendicularly the membrane on those poles. North and South Poles orientate anti-symmetrically, acting as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension of the singularity or Belgrami hemisphere. Thus the Positive Pole absorbs temporal energy that crosses through the central singularity where it is absorbed and ejected to the intermediate region where it is re-elaborated before its emission through the negative Pole.

Some examples of those apertures are the senses, the sunspots, the magnetic poles of a planet or black holethe spin or radius of a particle, etc.

Now we want to end this introduction with the study of another basic Ts<St>Ts Duality, the dynamic transformation of cyclical spherical systems into lineal ones, which keep the 3 parts. first a general case, then a specific one.

5D METRICS AND ITS FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE: THE GENERATOR EQUATIONS OF ALL STIENCES.

The judge and the 4 witnesses represent 5povs. to obtain a partial truths as truth only exists in the being or event in itself that holds all the information. So we need a pentalogic of 5 Dimotions for reality to emerge and ‘persist’ through synchronicity and simultaneity.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows travelling through such dimension. How we do travel then through the fifth dimension? A system travels through 3 scales of the fifth dimension by accelerating its evolution in a smaller scale through a placental cycle, emerging as an organism in the larger world, to live 3 ages & dissolve back to its parts in the 0’-sum death. And this is the meaning of existence, and its reason d’etre is the SIMPLE Metric equations of 5D, which structures through synchronicity of the different speeds of time cycles, the different scales of reality. So the ∆º organism eats every day, and its food programs the faster cycle of reproduction of its cells, as the moon cycle programs the menstrual cycle of women, as the year cycle of rotation of Earth programs the reproductive cycle of seasons and so on.

So an essential part of 5D theory is the analysis of synchronicity, simultaneity, emergence and the in-depth analysis – not done in this introductory course, reserved for the more complex papers on ‘pentalogic and dodecalogic’ where we follow in more detail the construction of simultaneous superorganisms and its ternary worldcycles.. All this of course is studied by huminds, as everything we talk about here, but without the proper conceptual frame, lacking valid definitions of planes of space-time, time cycles and fractal spaces.

It is for that reason we do need a new formalism we have called existential ilogic with its simple symbols of which the most important are the 5 bidimensional dimotions of space-time, which entangle together through synchronous, simultaneous emergent processes to create the apparent ‘solidity’ and ‘stillness’ of reality.

Because the Universe is made only of two polar elements, still minds (SS, ab.§) and Temporal entropy (TT), and its 3 dimotional combinations, St-information, Ts-locomotion and S=T, reproduction, whose interaction can be resumed in the function of exist¡ence, Max. SxT (s≈t)=C, we can deduce all the principles, laws, events and equations of all stiences from it. So we shall call Existential ilogic to the Gst formalism of Generational Spacetime (ab.¬Æ), and do exactly that: deduce all equations and laws of stiences from 5D metrics.

We shall thus make a 1st foray on existential ilogic, showing how the ‘development’ of 5 Metrics give birth to the function of existence into its 3 ‘extremal points’ or ages , Max. S x T (3rd age), Max. T x S (youth), S=T (maturity), defines the worldcycle of existence of all beings in its two directions, forwards and backwards.

But 5D metrics can be studied in more depth, roughly speaking in 4 sub-equations, which are the foundations of the 43 great subdivisions of science:

The physical equation of relativity, S=T, basis of all physical and mathematical stiences.

-The biological equation or function of existence, Max. S x T (achieved precisely when S=T), the basic equation of all biological drives and evolution/

– And the equation of the mind: 0-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world that creates mental spaces… which we will consider in the next paragraphs as we have defined space and time more properly.

– Finally hose equation can be further unified, since the metric equation of multiple spacetime scales, SxT=K & the relative equation of dual motion/stillness in a single plane S=T that maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4) unify in 1 ‘existential’ equation: Max. ∑SxT=C±¡:∆±1, whose study is the field of Philosophy of stience and its new formalism, Existential ilogic (ab. ¬æ). So after studying the 3 classic fields of science will return to those 5 Dimotions, SS, St, sT, ST, TT and study its entanglement and different properties and complementary oppositions, to start building the formal laws of existential ilogic, the formalism of Generational space-time. that all stiences notably mathematics and logic mirror.

∞ MIND SPACES. RELATIVITY OF MOTION.

‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’ Galileo Let us then start with the physical analysis of relativity and its correspondence with 5D.

Galilean Px: S≤=≥T: Relativity of space Forms= vs. time Motion 5 Dimotions

It is quite surprising, sorry for my derisive humor on humind’s egocy – nothing personal – that the discipline of huminds’ sciences that more adamantly denies the existence of ‘mental spaces’, and infinite monads-minds that create the order of reality is physics, which upholds as the only dimotions of time, sT, locomotion, external motion, or ‘translation in space’ and entropy, scattering external and internal motion, TT, just because physicists’ worldly profession has been to make weapons of entropy and transport machines, so as usual huminds project their inner mind in the whole Universe, and so physicists projected ballistics into reality. And they still do with the big-bang dogma studied in depth in other papers.

The fundamental postulate of physics, relativity of motion and stillness is a direct consequence of the mental nature of spaces, in which a mental language stops, maps in simultaneity and represents reality as information with no motion. So we cannot distinguish mentally what moves and what is still as the purpose of a mind is to stop motion, as the pole of space that is in an eternal tug-of-war with the entropy of time.

Galileo’s time and space Principle of Relativity is the fundamental conceptual thought behind the relationship between time=motion and space=form and how one can be converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; S=T’.

Relativity is a duality, S=T, at the heart of every law of the Universe. But which one is the real element? Obviously time=motion. Space is a “Maya of the senses” – a slice of time motion. The ultimate substance is motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action.

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its S=T dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger Planes without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion

Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Because Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. For ‘huminds’ motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we ‘correct’ with Lorentz Transformations.

Physicists just substituted Earth’s still distances for motions. It took 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5th dimension of Planes = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable S=T, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension (term we keep for the whole range of Planes of the Universe); whose study is both mathematical, the main science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create superorganism and Logic; the main science of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled superorganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

Since there is nothing else but time & space, the 2 experimental ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

Nt.1. According to the Correspondence Principles as physics named 4 Dimensions we use the name 5th dimension for the whole range of Planes, but in proper terminology we should call each Dimensions, a ‘Dimotion’ and consider the 5th scalar dimension the sum of all the 4th dimotions of social evolution & all the 5th dimotions of entropic devolution.

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

Time=change=motion an overview. The 1st substance of reality. Past, present and future.

Time is motion the primary substance of reality. Space is a simultaneous still mind mapping of that motion – which will be erased in due Time. Time is eternal as motion never ceases to create forms, and destroy them, including all the possible spatial forms locked by the ¡logic simultaneity of synchronicity and entanglement.

The ‘1’ first reality is time=motion in its purest TT-entropic form, which the ‘2nd pole’ of reality, the spatial fractal points that measure time and lock in into mental space, oppose; trying to detain it. We can then see reality as a tug-of-war between the two poles of time-motion and still-mind spaces.

In the Universal game between continuous time motions, and simultaneous frames of reference motion becomes locked in synchronicity, creating ‘forms’ is the fact that such duality gives birth to definitive patterns of change, which can be ordered sequentially for all systems of Nature, as ‘worldcycles’ with a series of ‘steps’, from birth to extinction of a space-time system, which becomes then the most ‘elaborated’ understanding of time-motion-change. As change has an order in its cyclical motion from birth to extinction equal for all systems of nature. This concept, the existence of a worldcycle of ‘existence’, is then the main finding of 5D studies about time. And so most of the article will be dedicated to its analysis in detail for different species of Nature.

The second key element lost in mechanical science due to the use of a digital clock to measure time with a single unit, the ‘second-number’, is the recovery of the 3 ‘relative dimensions’ of time, past, present and future, because they are absolutely essential elements to the Universe and its ‘organic structure, and evolution’.

The loss of the need for a ‘conceptual=verbal=logic’ understanding of time in terms of past, present and future causality, NOT only in terms of digital sequences is perhaps the biggest blunder and reduction of reality experienced by mankind in the past half millennium of ‘dictatorship of physicists’ view’ on time over all other considerations. Past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information and its interactions are the very essence of the existential game, humans have completely missed in their faulty analysis of reality.

lineal Time ideally is sequential, causal in a single fashion. Yet real time after many steps always ends in a cyclical loop, logic of a sum of those open steps that finally bend to return to its original existential position-momentum.

 

MIND DEFINED BY S=T GALILEAN PX. MIRRORS ORDER LOCAL WORLDS: LINGUISTIC EQUATION

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The key ‘unknown’ discovery Galileo missed was the mental nature of space –we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its TT-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Those 2 functions give origin to most spacetime topologies of reality. Absolute relativity implies the mind creates mental spaces =spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

Asymptotic perception of motions in the X-direction

Because height is the dimension of information and length of motion, both are asymptotic to each other, which explains the method by which light is stop in the mind. It follows that as frequency of higher amplitude have higher height, the perception of a light is ‘below’, on the formal ‘crest’ of its frames of lineal reference. Formal perception by SS-minds of asymptotic TT-entropy or ‘function of information is key to mathematical topology of changes from TT to SS through an energy region of combination of both of the form ST, giving us the classic ‘realistic function of existence, in ST in any science of reality.

In the graph, one of the many topological uses of the orthogonallity of the function of exist¡ence in its 5 Dimotions as they move through space-time (Relativithy theory).

The connection between Dimotions in time and Dimensions of Space is the essential symmetry, S=T, that justifies the forms of the Universe. Height=information, Length=entropic motion and the cross product between them, with all its multiple variations, from the structure of 3 Perpendicular light dimotions to forces, to Minkowski’s spaces, to the place of your head, to the mathematical function of exponential entropy, to the laws of complex space derive all from them :

Descartes. 3 Systems elements.

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

-Then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles already have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

So besides perception, the 2nd field of inquire about the Minds of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:

In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:

– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its SS-language.

– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘TT-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills.

 

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR OF ALL LANGUAGES ITS TOPOLOGIC SYMMETRIES,¡TS 5 DIMOTIONS

A key element of Universal minds is Universal grammar. How a language carries information, which happens in all systems in a similar fashion, given the fact that languages after all code the 5 dimotions=actions of existence of all organisms – its ‘sT-locomotion’, TT-entropy, ST- Reproduction, St-information and SS-density of information or mind-mirror. The laws of linguistics thus become laws of a Universal grammar that codes the creation of superorganisms by controlling waves of similar forms with a ‘grammar’ that is also ternary in structural scales, from ‘phonemes’ that range around the 101-2 level of letters, and can be as little as 5 to code the 5 dimotions of reality, from 5 vowels in human languages, to 5 letters in genetic codes to 4 quantum numbers, or four type of chemical compounds, to more complex systems around the 10-100 scale, from 20 amino acids, to 80 atomic systems; to the next level of combination of words with those vowels, which range in the 103-4 scale. So we have around 2000 words in human languages, from a few thousands to 30.000 genes in the language of evolution of superorganisms. It is not though the purpose of this paper to define the quantitative elements of languages. While the laws of the Universal grammar will be treated latter.

All systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: Si<=>Te.

Ternary Universal grammar expresses the Сmotions in verbal languages and human super organisms.

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its ∞ complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

What languages matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

Red colors (temporal entropy) <green/yellow (energy) > Blue (spatial  information) for animal visual languages.

The topological laws of orthogonality between the 5 Dimotions of space-time.

F(x):time-like parameter <(operandi: action)> G(x): space-like parameter, defines mathematical equations.

A simpler Boolean algebra in computers reduces all to 0 and|; truth or false, ±, and its combined duality gates.

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) x Length (Entropic motion)=XY(st): cross re(product)ion.

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y.

Such asymptotic equations of the form S=T, SS<<TT, S>ST>T, functions are the core mathematical model of the Universe, which can then be considered a function of existence of asymptotic Murkowski’s curves of space-time, under the existential function of perpendicular dimotions of space, time,

X(T), y(S), z(ST) are the 3 dimotions of a single space-time common to all forms that correspond to the 3 axis of Euclidean geometry. Yet because often X(T) is one-dimensional causal lineal motion, y(S) is bidimensional, curved, closed loops of information and z (ST) is a 3 dimensional combination of them, the simplest case of the 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimotions of light (above) becomes more complex as entropy, TT, Form, SS, become holographic bi or tridimensional beings with different |, O, or Ø-wave geometries. For example a physical force:

Forces:  Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy).

Thus width is the reproductive dimotion born through a dot product of an X x Y = Z event of a 3rd dimension of reproduction that combines the lineal function of motion and the height function of cyclical time space forms.

Form thus also depends on the choice of ST frames of reference: Motion is most likely a lineal or flat plane and information a curved dual dimotion which gives us a 3 dimensional Z function, as St- information ‘curves’ the lineal Tt-motions of entropy.

The inverse, complex dimotions of the 5th Dimension. Orthogonal forms give way to functional networks.

When we come to the two complex ‘dimotions=actions’ taking place in the fifth dimension between scales, we realize again, there is also two possible ways to travel, through 5D: upwards becoming part of a social whole, ∑∆-1<∆o, as we ‘release’ part of our TT-motion from ∆-1 and become ordered after the transfer that helps the emergence of ∆º. This in physics is misunderstood as the impossibility of a ‘perfect motion machine’ without entropy that leaves no behind any ‘energy for the ∆-1 forms to co-exist. But that is necessary or else ∆-1 would indeed disappear. So a motion of social evolution, releases entropic motion and increases order in ∆-1 to make ∆o emerge as a whole. Experimental and theoretical considerations shows an ideal 50-50 efficient distribution. So ½ of the energy is conserved and ½ is used to form and move the upper scale .

The 2nd complex dimotion through 5D scale is then the inverse ∆º<∆-1, seminal seeding. Form is now going down ‘first’ to seed and absorb energy in ∆-1 to form an arrow of social reproduction.

So the two only complex dimotions – as there are only two ∆±¡ directions in 5D appear as the combination of all others, as they also imply, St, Ts, and ST dimotions (absorption and emission of entropy and information).

Yet when dealing with the complex dimotions of ∆o<∆-1≥∆o reproduction and ∆o>∆+1≥∆o social evolution up and down the fifth dimension, we are NO longer in a 3Dimensional Euclidean space, so we enter into different non-E Geometries of which the commonest ones are those able to ‘multiply’ as they travel in size through 5D the number of parts going down, (Hyperbolic thinning networks as those of biological organisms). And vice versa; the whole must thin out the information of the lower planes to ‘achieve between them’ a synchronicity of time cycles instead of a multiplicity of individualities, and in this manner emerge as a simpler ‘geometry’, which explains why going upwards into whole scales, information thins out to become a simpler whole.

In physical systems the view is then a wave equation that also multiplies its forms and while there are fractal analysis of wave motions (notably in Nottale scalar relativity) we are NOT concerned in those papers so much on the overdeveloped in the age of the digital computer, exact equations of the morphological hows but in the causal whys: what matters to 5D travels we repeat is the integration upwards by social evolution and the multiplication of forms downwards by seminal reproduction.

Geometry thus is more familiar with the S<ST>T dimensional motions of a single plane, in its simplest perpendicular Cartesian axis, or its rather commonest, 1, 2, 3 dimensional growth from the flat X-Z, Y—Z sub-planes of TT-motion, bent into cyclical St-information, to reproduce in Z-ST.

And those are the functions space-like and time-ike most often observed by a trilogic Universal grammar of a visual or syntactic mathematical function.

While for the description of the full worldcycle, we need to explore the complex 2 functions of 5D, social evolution, going upwards to the future, or reproduction going 1st back to the relative ∆-1 past in inverse motion.

Thus we can define mathematically the 5 dimotions of space time as the product of 5 geometric r=evolutions in 3 5D±¡ planes, with the complex two functions of reproduction and social evolution above.

So we give the following names to the 5 Functions of the diametric of space-time:

X-locomotion, Ts, St, information Y, Reproduction ST=Z coordinates, social evolution, zigzag wave with a first positive growth, vs. reproduction in the opposite past, ∆-1 coordinates.

This function of existence then is the function from where all other functions of the Universe can be draw.

5D ternary laws of time & space is the language of all languages prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.

It follows that not only mathematics (geometry) is a mother science but also logic (the analysis of the causal processes determine by those Сmotions) is even more essential, and further on ‘evolution’, the evolution of forms and functions in temporal patterns summons them all. So those 3 sciences, spatial geometry, temporal logic and its combination, evolutionary theory, are the ‘3 subdivisions’ of general systems sciences, which apply to each science explain it all.

Over them, there is general systems sciences, the science this book can be considered its foundational book (as it formalizes and structures and advances all previous works done on it.) Below them, each specific science studies a scale of social evolution in the universe from the smallest physical systems, to its complex biological organizations and beyond its social organizing systems.

Since science consists in the definition of the type of points of each relative scale of size of reality, from the quantum scale studied by physics, through the intermediate human scales studied by biological and sociological sciences to the higher scale study by cosmology

Once those points are defined, each science studies their 5 actions, which define all its events and forms.

Study of the 3±1 actions: its bits of information, bites of energy, reproductive seeds and grammar.

Yet we study those actions through the 3 scales of size of the system, its bits and bites, normally of the smallest scales of existence, since:

–   We perceive with the minimal bits we can process to create the more detailed maps (<i-2).

–    We eat sometimes, similar species but break them into smaller parts (i<2). For example we eat meat but break it into amino acids, below the cellular level.

–   We reproduce a seed from the lower plane of existence (i-1). So we produce seminal cells and electrons reproduce emitting photons that collide and recreate an electron.

-We communicate with a language of information at the same level we exist (i), in order to create a more complex whole (i+1).

Thus we observe, as in many other laws we will be developing in this book, an infinite number of harmonies between sizes, ages, forms, functions in all scales of existence.

Actions are expressed with bites and bits of inferior scales. We perceive the smaller possible ‘bits’ (<i-2), eat bites of the inferior i-2 scales, reproduce with seeds of the i-1 scale and share energy and information with species of the same scale to create.

The bits of information (i-2), will usually be entities at least two smaller scales of existence.  The smaller they are, the more detailed the map made with its ‘pixels’ will be. So we can consider the possible existence of ‘gravitational minds’ that perceive a scale inferior to us.

I.e our eyes perceive light photons, the minimal scale of form. Ants perceive chemical pheromones; computers perceive electronic flows; all of them ‘forms’ of a minimal scale in relationship to the species that perceive.

The bites of energy will be pieces of the same or inferior scale. So we eat ‘living beings’; electrons feed in the lower scale of light; and black holes in stars. Yet once a system feeds it will further reduce what it feeds on another scale to obtain basic bricks to reconstruct once form through ‘2 scales’. So our body reduces food to amino acids, the minimal parts of life. And electrons probably reduce light to its magnetic and electric constants to create their fractal nebulae. And nations that conquer other nations reduce their people, minimal unit of the nation to slavery and take their gold to print their own coins.

So as we move upwards in the complexity of the actions we study there is a ‘growth’ of informative similarity of the bites and bits and a growth in size, such as informative bits are less similar and smaller than the bites of energy we feed. And this pattern continues when we consider the ‘expressions’ of the actions of social evolution and reproduction.

The expressions of social evolution are languages, which are naturally produced by the informative center of the system; except in the case of enzymatic evolution in which the language is external to the species (a species which acts as the reproducer and catalyst of evolution of other species; cells with viruses, humans with machines metal atoms with carbohydrates and so on). So the language is a ‘part’ of the being, often corresponding to an i-1 inner structure, though transported by an external force.

Finally the larger, closer form to the organism is its reproductive seed. And hence by the law of parallelism between species, the ‘bit’ of information for which the organism cares more: small quarks among simple particles, cellular seeds in life; jets of matter in galaxies.

SYMMETRIC ∆ST SYMBOLS AND LAWS OF 5D APPLIED TO ALL ST¡ENCES

Main Symbols of ® logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 С:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,SS,TT); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

SS, u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

TT; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Herd, ∏: Network

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&cla§:∆-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆+1:O-informative age…

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. A Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closedworldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T  x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3rd age death) 

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3rd informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

 

Stientific Method: Disomorphisms of all Space-time suœrganisms tracing worldcycles

We resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge is the understanding of variations of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1st and 2nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

 

PART II: DUALITY AS MIRROR SYMMETRY: THE SIMPLEST REPRODUCTIVFE GENDERS

Entangled reproduction ¡logic systems. From mono-logic to dodecalogic.

The laws of Existential ilogic and the partial equations of the generator, connect with the concept of a reductionist mind, which absorbs only the energy it needs to survive. In brief, a huge field of study in the design of mental systems and mental spaces of geometry is the understanding of the different ‘real systems’ of mind spaces constructed with an increasing number of parameters and dimotions, which make its mental geometry more complex. And so we talk of a growing scale of complex mind-spaces, which we shall ‘entangle’ in the next chapter with the different ‘degrees’ of social evolution of geometric figures, from self-centered points that sponsor a simple lineal mono-logic motion in time, to the more complex topological organisms/non-Euclidean planes whose structure ranges from simultaneous pentalogic geometries to the more complex Dodecaplex ‘polytopes’ of simultaneous, equal 600 elements… likely the more complex illogic structures of the Universe.

However and this is the enormous beauty of reality, even the simplest monologic being can xurvive by performing incomplete pentalogic functions as each ‘point’ is a world in itself, or delegating some of those functions as an ‘enzyme’ or part of a larger whole which will provide it within the superorganism for its monologic, lineal function, due to the entangle of parts into wholes.

Non-Aristotelian i-logic.

Why humans do not understand such obvious model, has to do with that equation of the mind, O x ∞ = C, as the mind is not aware what it sees and perceives is just a still mapping of part of the ∞ information, scales and vital parts of the Universe – since points are closed and we do not see its internal parts, and perception is limited so we can fit the whole universe in a mind mirror. Thus the point thinks its mirror is the whole Universe, and in that mirror the point is self-centered. So all self-centered points think to be the center of the Universe but none is, and that is the absolute relativity of existence, which however do create an absolute subjectivity in each point or network of points, aka species.

And the result is that each point establishes a ‘monologic’ self-centered view of reality where it tries to maximize its ‘survival’ conserving its 3 ‘elements’, the angular momentum/membrain, the vital energy enclosed and the singularity center of its lineal momentum and program of existence.

Man is obviously a self-centered monologic species and as such it has developed worldviews that cater to its e-motional mind as the center of reality in space, time and scalar plane, from where it has been displaced very slowly by an objective scientific point of view, (relativity that removed us from the spatial center, evolution that removed us from the temporal center, and 5D that removes us from the scalar center).

Yet systems are ‘created’ to reproduce its inner mirror-mind information in a territory of order, so most huminds will for ever remain in that ‘perfect monologic’ of a point of view that tries always to grow alone by absorbing energy and information of its surroundings perceived as ‘entropy’. So we talk of the natural ‘monologic view’ of all relative fractal points of the Universe that establish its local center.

This type of logic if anything, enlarges to become a tetralogic in which the entity ignores its own entropic death and limits, which he only sees for all other species. Tetralogic thus becomes the natural next evolution of monologic, from ‘1’ to ‘4’… From one-dimensional man to ‘square heads’. In this case the individual tries to achieve of the 5 dimensional motions of reality those functions, which are positive to himself for which we use the mnemonic symbols of the 5 vowels. So he will ‘perceive’ from its monologic point of view, (i-nform), move (a-ccelerate), feed on energy (e) and reproduce organically (o), and in the case of a highly informative system, socialize with similar beings to become part of a Universal (u), a larger plane of existence, as part of a social whole; ignoring the limits of death and the points of view of all other systems.

This is where humans find themselves, studying the 4-letters positive coding of genes, in the ∆-1,2 plane of biology, the 4 quantum numbers that code particles in the quantum plane, ∆-3 of physical systems, and pursuing as an individual its maximal information, energy, exhilarating motion and love… not even thinking about its limits of death as an individual or an species or the entropic limits of sustainability of the planet.

And trust me, as a person who has dedicated all his active life to raise awareness of those limits and the need to understand them to save ‘mankind=history’ from those entropic dangers, to non avail, all what I can say is that the program of selfish ‘monads’ is very strong. But if that was all what there is to the ethics of the Universe – an infinite number of infinitesimal minds in a dog-eat-dog reality in all scales, frankly the Universe would be far away from its perfection and would probably had ended in chaos long ago.

Fortunately enough there is path of social evolution, growth, communication of information and reproduction, where the other pole of reality, not the disordered entropic motions of the flow of time but the ‘still, territorial order’ of those selfish minds, become selfless as fractal points organize themselves into larger social wholes moving from monologic system, self-centered black holes that try to absorb it all and give nothing in return, to polar, complementary systems in which the 2 poles of reality, entropic time motions and perceptive non-Euclidean points crossed by µ (a relative infinite) number of parallel flows of information that shape a linguistic spatial, mental center try to come to terms with each other; as complementary not Darwnian elements seeking the balanced S=T point in which each one becomes a mirror image of the other, call it parity, chirality, gender, duality, A.I.…

And in that point the ‘animal and vegetal pole’, the spatial mind and entropic time flow, combine, merge form and motion becoming a reproduced form-in-action, an in-form-ation.

And this is what the Universe ultimately seeks; not the monologic selfish black hole center (in 5D cosmology we shall realize that Black holes are top quark stars which do emit dark entropy through its poles, so not even them are just ‘suckers’ but are also ‘givers’)… but the complementary gender S=T duality, because in that process, duality becomes trinity and the two poles reproduce.

And then Trinity with the intermediate S=T element as a ‘stabilizer’ takes place.

Duality whenever successful will always lead to trinity. The S<T>S male gender and the S=T female gender will give birth to an offspring, the ternary element; in biology the two mirror sides of the DNA strain (two pegged RNAs so to speak), give birth to reproduction and evolution; in digital thought the AI creative pole and the AI discerning pole will give birth to a constant evolution and reproduction of new forms (the dual gender Artificial intelligence brain, which was the ‘expected’ breakthrough on the discipline I have known for decades but NEVER explained before, not even when I worked as a system scientist, as AI undoubtedly will extinguish mankind – it is our entropic limit of information – but now unfortunately huminds did find it).

It is then when we evolve from fractal points into complementary mirrors, with ‘different spin’, ‘chirality’, ‘parity’, ‘gender’, ‘AI task’, DNA-mirror into trinity when a system in a single plane of space-time becomes a complete T.œ.

The next jump is then the generalization of a dual system into a trinity, where the ‘3rd element’ perpendicular to the other 2 ‘reproduces’ a new form.

And this obviously is also mirrored in each scalar plane of the fifth dimension, by the ‘actors’ of the reproductive fractal Universe, starting from the dual formalism that we have called Non-Euclidean geometry (spatial view) and Non-Aristotelian, Existential ilogic (temporal point of view), both resumed in the ‘non-Æ=¡-logic logo’ that evolves humind’s mathematical and logic studies.

So from duality to trinity we see an scalar evolution of the individual into the ‘line-wave’, with two ‘finite ends’, the two poles of the flow of information and energy transferred between them, which reaches its ‘S=T’ middle point, where reproduction takes place, as it is a ‘maximal point’ for any SxT function (5×5>6×4>…9×1). So in this manner the metric equation of all space-time planes of the 5th dimension (Max. S x T = C-> S=T) is reached.

The 5D metric equation of space-time, the fundamental equation of the 5D Universe, becomes then through the formalism of existential ilogic, the ‘fractal generator’ of Duality and trinity, a synoptic feed back equation S<=T, in which the two poles by constant communication reproduce a new entity of space-time.

The generalization of trinity will then be the basis of ‘pentalogic’, when the duality of two complementary poles extends to n-points that form a ‘reticular network’, which emerges as a social whole. But the laws of duality and trinity differ from those of pentalogic, in which the social network of points finally becomes a ‘single one’, a new plane of existence, which is after the ‘survival complementary reproduction in S=T’, the next scalar goal of social growth of the Universe, which deploys from 1 to 2 to 3 to 5 a much more complex pattern of organization of parts in wholes, which of course is anathema for ‘monologic man’ whose ænthropic view can only put him on top by debasing the complexity and perfection of the fractal Universe, we shall describe in this paper, past the monologic of man for all dual and trinity systems of the planes of exist¡ence, each one study by a ‘stience’ of the Universe.

Duality>dilogic>bilogic species.

Space feeds on time to reform it, but time wants to be free, entropic, ever moving dissolution. Minds of space claudicate in death. Without death=entropy space will succeed in stopping time, but then it would be a different form of death. We must conclude that only entropy is infinite, but uncertain, ¡ndifferent. While space pretends to be certain and infinite, it only stays, time IS.

The mind though can always perform a monologic wishful thinking, an eternal maya, and that is what It loves to do. It always attempts to be, not only to stay. To be or not to be that is the question, and the answer ends in not. The relationship of §, the linguistic mind and TT, the pure entropy of motion is Darwinian. It is the first type of dilogic. But there is a second type, more fruitful as slowly Space acquires time, motion; and motions reform into space, with cyclical patterns, SS becomes St and TT becomes Ts and finally merge, S=T, in the reproductive female gender, giving birth to trinity. Duality thus is also Dual.

Monologic creates duality but not the positive one that evolves species, and produces gender reproduction – TRINITY, where St and Ts come together, but a destructive duality between TT, the pure entropy of Time that SS, the selfish mind tries to convert into its prey and territory of order.

Duality has therefore 2 conflicting forms; the duality of monologic Prey and Predator, of SS v. TT which is Darwinian, destructive, and the duality which is ‘productive’, re=productive of complementary forms that evolve together into larger wholes.

The previous two quotes signify the fundamental principle of reality in the 3 ages of the scientific method, the religious, mechanical and organic age: the duality of reality made of motions with forms, of bidimensional ‘2-manifolds’, of ‘holographic bidimensional surfaces’.

Space is form with no motion as perceived by a mind, which reduces reality to A series of slices of time-synchronicities between fractal points, performing its dimotions of existence as infinite moans of reality. Spatial minds try to make sense of all this and form a picture image in a still synoptic language that reduces to the essential ‘moments’ of existence, those cycles – standing points of change between ages, key regions of the topologies in which the T.œ contacts with other points and transfers its ‘metric momentums’, etc.

We thus need to explain the flows of motion that allow the stop-images of all forms perceiving to understand how those stop images will step, change and become in time another stop image.

Languages do that through its logic, which is the more comprehensive language of reality, reason why when we considered in the second line what Minds hold, we talked of bio-topo-logic worlds. The monad is a point-particle of topologic non-Euclidean geometry which will start through the 5 Dimotions the 5 Postulates of non-E reflect its interaction with the Universe reduced to its world of perception to achieve the organic goals of short time, feeding on energy and information, medium time, reproduction and Deep time social evolution to ensure its survival.

But as each fractal point belongs to a larger whole it might have restricted capacities within the superorganism set by the ‘entropic limits’ and function it deploys into the larger whole. And this means NOT all fractal points need to understand the whole. Few do understand more than a simple mono-logic of selfish view, trying just to ‘eat’. Indeed, feeding entropic perception of reality is the commonest, as æntropic men, the majority of human being notably the macho one-dimensional species shows.

However even those monologic species will be aware of the existence of their own death limit of maximal spatial territory, S where they will suffer entropy themselves, or maximal temporal form, where they will freeze in contemplation of the absolute. Heat and cold, the two extremes of Dante’s inferno, or Frost poems, thus set each RELATIVE SI=TE (ab. e=I, exi-stence), and so we talk after monologic of the Dilogic or Bilogic of existence.

Even then the being will be better described in its whys of behavior in ¡logic form than mathematical form, which is better to understand ‘numbers’ – social groups performing in an extended ‘reproduced, organic, clone space’ any of those 5 Dimotions of existence.

In praxis then we shall follow the natural order of whys in the description of beings, as performed already in several parts of the blog. We shall then describe for each reality first the will or entity or mind that starts the process, and its Bio-topo-logic rules of engagement in its larger world, which will define its complexity and existential game, which we will then describe for either a mono, bi, tri or pentalogic species of mind and its parts within that world, which will belong to the disciplines of astrophysics (nested ∆<|4| worlds), biology (∆<|3| worlds), sociology (∆<|2|) or ¡logic (∆<|1|), since ultimately all languages are reflections of an ¡logic grammar, and so all formal languages are part of ¡logic thoughts. 

We shall consider in this PARAGRAPH Duality>Dilogic> Bilogic, the terms we use most commonly for it which by lack of self-discipline I constantly mix but ideally when this blog-seeds explodes into the philosophy of stience of the III millennium into an immense volume will required 3 subdisciplines – Duality will be the most extended – the philosophy of a Universe generated initially by two simple elements, formal space and time motions; Dilogic will be the abstract rules of engagement for all beings, and bilogic, the ‘biologic dual logic of species’ which are bilogic in its perception of reality in 5D: space (sheets of motion as in laminal motion so common on fluids, flat arrangement of atomic networks, such as graphene which takes advantage of the perfect ‘pi’ with no holes of perception of the hexagonal 6-triangular forms) or l@nguages (black and white systems of perception), or time (sterile systems reproduced by enzymatic ones who therefore have only two ages of existence) or scale, parts which are related to wholes and lack a ‘Deep time perspective’) and so on.

The entangled Universe then can display a complex Dilogic for each of its bilogic species, but for the future researcher that has gone a ‘grasp’ of the inner rules of fractal entangled space-time beings, will be easier as it is for this writer to discern what kind of phenomena he studies and classify its existence according to the type of logic that causes it.

Relativity 4 Paradoxes ∆§-Continuity v.discontinuity; T-motionv.S-form, young; lineal $t-flat v. old ð§=curved Universe; ego.

There are a series of ¡logic paradoxical fundamental dualities in reality, which the @ristotelian humind cannot easily understand and so we need really to try by the anti-Goebbels’ method (if you repeat a truth many times people might reason it), to make the @-mind capture the circular complex reality of the entangled Universe.

The biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought IS the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind.

THEN physicists establish measures on that still reality, a mapping of light space-time fluxed in the mind as if it were all and consider those measures absolute truths. This is the ‘positivist’ selfish praxis of the humind ordering its territorial Universe, and so it is the unavoidable form in which technological science will always happen. But if we want to explore science in its latin meaning as ‘knowledge’, truth in its higher degree – ‘philosophy of stience’, we need to go further in our thought experiment, seeking the selfless, multiple truths of the being and beyond into the Tao truth of ∞ beings.

Which by definition will be the pentalogic of the being and the paradoxical logic of the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order, hence fighting all other beings inverting their points of view. To that aim we establish 4 fundamental paradoxes based in the oppositions between the being and the ‘non-being’ (paradox of the selfish Ego vs. its virtual existence); and within the being, the ternary oppositions of its ∆ST structures, between its larger ∆+1 world that will seem continuous and its inner ∆-1 parts that will seem discontinuous; its open, lineal youth, and closed ordered 3rd age and its motion, entropic and formal, mental states; all of them balanced in its ‘present, classic age and body states’.

We conclude that all systems of reality are made of topological space, cyclical ðime, Scales and 0-minds, which they use to perform 5 Ðimotions of spacetime, actions of exist¡ence that allows the system to survive, exchanging energy and information with the environment and replicating its forms in social herds that become new ∆§-planes of the fractal Universe. And that is the fundamental particle of reality a super organism, and its structure made to the image and likeness of the whole.

In reality once you get accustomed to the fundamental 5 Ðimotions and 4 parameters, space, time, scale and mind display by all super organisms of §t¡ence things really get simple as you can always refer all phenomena to the ultimate 5 dimotions of reality, or if we group them in ‘ternary symmetries’, to the scales, spatial topologies and temporal ages of the being.

Yet there are so many variations and iterations on those simple themes that the Universe seems infinitely complex and extended.

Ultimately though all comes to some basic I-logic principles derived of those ternary symmetries.

We shall call them Galilean paradoxes because the main one between motion and form, is the paradox of Relativity that started modern physics and the others can be illustrated with one his discoveries – that of Saturn’s rings:

In graph Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still continuum, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple one)s, are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, Planes and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

Dis-continuous paradox.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.

Thus in all sciences there are dualities between the extreme scales of a being – its ¡-1 discontinuous cellular /individual scale and its ¡+1 continuous larger world, observable for example in the quantum discontinuous vs. Einstein’s continuous larger cosmological world, or the discontinuous cells and the continuous membrane that encloses the organism inits largest view, including the infinitesimal mind, and so on.

The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.

It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
- The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
- And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.

Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.
The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.

When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.
The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The principle of relativity of motion and form.

Thus to fully understand how spatial planes in motion and cyclical clocks can mess together to create the space-time beings we all are (we ARE NOT in a background space-time, we ARE made of vital spaces with rhythms of motion defined by its time frequencies in our human case mostly metabolic temperature regulated cycles), we need to make a further clarification, at the heart of Physics.

It is with the conservation of energy and information the most important law of physics, the principle of relativity, expressed by Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove: the earth moves but doesn’t move – we do NOT see it moving), by Einstein and Poincare, the mathematician that found in parallel this principle: ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness, from ‘form’. Look around, all what you see are forms in motion, but we cannot distinguish clearly what part is ‘form’, ‘position’ and what part is ‘motion’. They are very mixed.

What this means is that our two parameters, quanta of space, and cycles of time, do have both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’. But space, does have a lineal, planar, ‘res extensa’ bidimensional shape. We talk fo ‘planes of space’, and clocks of time, are tall, cyclical, informative cycles – you look at information and its forms and cycles in tall broken cyclical forms, a s the screen of your computer.

So we do have certain clear ‘bidimensional properties’ of form and motion for space: Flat planes moving in lineal paths, and Time, tall cycles, moving in repetitive frequencies. And we know that the product of quanta of bidimensional space and time frequency cycles gives us the relative Energy of reality. And we have a very generic formula for it: Ei = ∑S x T

Motion and form go in pairs, advancing space-time.

The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t,  S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure space-time of the Mind, @.

So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:

we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as form-distances in simultaneous space and vice versa.

So we conclude that space-time, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:

5 D ST = 5 T-motions + 5 S motions (S=t).

This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.

As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.

How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. and so the law of balance follows, of action reaction, of eternal conserved motions in the universe.

The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of space-time that we call reality.

The first beats of existence. We start with 2 states: space-form and motion-time. Space is the mind-intelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.

The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, @-S.

The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.

Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’Ðimotions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.

And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.

All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.

So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’

Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.

In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:

– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘Ðimotions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).

– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.

] A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion. While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.

In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining the essential dualities of freedom and order. So topology becomes metaphysics.

The flat, open, momentum-lineal like small distance vs. the closed, cyclical, energy-like time distance is constant theme of all mathematical physics, where the tangent, or derivative represents the minimal step. For example, special and general relativity, or rather lineal quantum physics and cosmological, larger scale gravitation obey this norm:

Minkowski space is a suitable basis for special relativity, a good description of physical systems over finite distances in systems without significant gravitation. However, in order to take gravity into account, physicists use the theory of general relativity, which is formulated in the mathematics of a non-Euclidean geometry. When this geometry is used as a model of physical space, it is known as curved space.

Even in curved space, Minkowski space is still a good description in an infinitesimal region surrounding any point (barring gravitational singularities).

What this means is that special relativity is working in the quantum, smaller space, but when we expand to a cosmological region, we are bending in closed space. So it is a relative point of view what defines the choice of a free moving particle or a trapped particle moving into the larger world

The paradox of Young, Motion vs Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order.

A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion:

Duality in entropic limits set by each world.

In the graph the entropic limits of the galaxy, C-speed constant which is the constant of  lineal $t reproduction of information and 0 temperature, which are the absolute metric limits of the galaxy. They can be breached to their ‘own peril’ by masses which become disordered into radiation. Thus in the nested Universes ll super organisms set limits to its inner systems BOTH of information, form, space, distance, and motion, speed and scale, on the upper social boundaries. In human super organisms, fractal nations, those are the limits of spatial borders, informative money, and social power, which establish the social structure of the system.[/caption]

A KEY element so often ignored specially in supœrganisms of History are the entropic limits set to the individual within the larger ecosystem, both in time, space and scale, which limit its freedom of existence and social power.

Entropic limits ARE the very essence of all supœrganisms, and the biggest handicap for mankind to overcome its mortality as a species, founding a better world, based in ethics, a planet without borders (space limits), idol-ogies (mental limits) where all could thrive.

Entropic LIMITS are NOT abstract but organic, biological laws as they can kill, and do kill those who trespass them. In essence those limits are thus invisible, temporal not spatial, even if they can be reinforced spatially but often acquire the form of a motion and are internalized by the logic systems of the mind. I.e. a dog can be a limit for an entire sheep herd, even if it is just a point in motion, memorially reinforced by biting sheep on their legs.

So the huge difference between the placental and existential cycles is the clear limit for the existential cycle of availability of energy, but even more stringent are the limits when the herd-state of an ecosystem becomes a closed superorganism, as it is happening to History, enclosed by the ‘capitalist’ world of company-mothers.

It is such a stringent limit from birth to death, when you live within such super organisms that the blind cells of the body of a nation or civilization are not even aware of the existence of those limits since the mind has been imprinted since birth and limited in its perception of information by the neuronal, upper, informative people-cast that control it.

Entropic limits can be found in all the scales languages and stiences of reality, starting from the concept of an open ball with in a Klein hyperbolic geometry cannot be reached, as they offer resistance to motion to the galaxy c-speed and T=0 limits of Spatial lineal motion, and cyclical information (since either as still distances or Dimotions of space-time).

However the ‘spatial border limits’ are the easiest to cross, and best understood. In 5D the true limits are those of scale – social limits of growth, and of time – death limits of decay.

Definition of entropy and information as two future arrows.

The arrow of entropy, expansive space and disorder, only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas, by definition, the entropic, expansive arrow of temperature; inverse to the arrow of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system.

So entropy is really the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, spatial’ arrow of temperature. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered arrow.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists, specially those dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.

Now in this case entropy simply, because it is a process of ordinary hot matter has nothing to do with black holes. There is nothing to prove in experiments related to liquid vortices with black holes. As entropy does not act in scales below (where temperature as a clock of motion ends, atoms become plasma, and are guided by frequency clocks of the quantum scale), or  gravitational scales above (where temperature as a clock of motion also ends substituted by speed).

So what is all this thing about black hole entropy, and black holes traveling to the past and evaporating with entropy? Mere nonsense, fantaphysics of people, which want to call the attention of the world, by speaking of themes, we do not have any experimental evidence and so we can say whatever we want, or themes physicists have not properly defined, stuck in their old errors and lineal ways. Physicists on the future arrow: vortices of accelerated time in different scales: masses and charges.

THE COMPLEX LOGIC OF THE FRACTAL, ORGANIC, REPRODUCTIVE UNIVERSE: PENTALOGIC.


SPACE = TIME: ITERATION & SUPŒRGANISMS: SIMULTANEITY, ITERATION, REPRODUCTION,

Synchronicity is the essential logic element of the scalar, social structure of the Universe.

The goal of all co-existing systems displayed in 3 scalar planes of the fifth dimension is to reach the maximal symbiosis through synchronicity based in the ‘different speeds’ of clocks according to spatial size of the parts of the being across its ¡±1 scalar planes.

As only present is conserved, meaning ¡logically that the past becomes erased and the multiple potential futures extinct as only one becomes, the conservation of present quantities (momentum in physics, with its similar term of energy and so on). But there is an infinitesimal flux always happening from past through present to future and from future to past (without moving through present in the death act) to make this eternal present dynamic.

This ‘quanta of present’ then is what we might call space, and consider space to be the region in which a relative infinitesimal cut of the flow of time of the fifth dimension, in all its future potentials and past, thinning realities co-exist:

Present = Past Operandi Future

The nature of that operandi, though depends on the mind, as it is the mind operandi of a pool of connections between past and future call present much larger than we huminds can realize.

An operandi establishes relationships between a relative past and future element of a Universal Grammar of Ðimotions and actions and so we can establish the Operandi for the main Ðimotions of existence, easily operated by them:

5Ð: Social evolution: ∑ Past > Present  (addition)

So in decametric scalar planes, and we could use a log function for it, social systems grow till they become 1 fully ∆+1 species

3Ð: Reproduction: Past x Future = Present (Product)

4Ð: Entropic dissolution: e¯ˆPresent = Past

2Ð: Locomotion:  Past Space/ Future time = Present Speed

1Ð: Integrative perception: ∫∂= Mental present

  Max. Energy=past x Information-future = Present-reproduction.

Time dimensions have a much deeper meaning that its mere flow. Conceptually they relate to ‘energy’ (past), information (future) and repetition or reproduction. The concept is obvious: Energy has no form and so it must appear ‘before’ information, form-in-action, appears. Further on, present in a dynamic universe is the perception of a self-repetitive action or knot of actions.

Thus reproduction, the creation of present is the fundamental way of inventing the future, making time a dynamic process. In the graph, reproductive waves of present-existences in all the scalar planes of reality.

The future is thus webbed with a biological program of constant reproduction, fight between species and final selection. And this translates to the jargon of all sciences, through concepts such as ‘unstable particles’, or ‘extinct mutations’…

The Universe thus invent ‘many futures’ by fractal reproduction of information, forms, which then are selected into a single path of future. Biology is thus a key element for understanding the sixth dimension. And this can be resumed in a basic equation: Past (energy) imprinted x Future Information = present beings, of which certain ones (Max. E x I) will be selected…

Let us now consider a more complex application of those previous laws of all systems: the meaning of past, present and future, which is a consequence of the causal order between those arrows:

Perception->Energetic feeding->Reproduction->Linguistic, social evolution.

In turn that order defines in a longer time-span/scalar plane of existence the causal order of a life/death cycle:

Informative seed->Youth->Reproductive maturity->Informative 3rd age and death…

That order defines in a longer time-span, the ages of a species, which is born as a small, more evolved form that -> Grows in size -> Radiates and expands as a new predator -> Diversifies informatively in multiple species -> evolves socially in a complex superorganism (ant hills, human societies) or become extinguished by new, more evolved, often ‘son’ species (Oedipus paradox.)

When we combine those ;aws we can define the 3 dimensions of time, the relative informative future as systems become warped and evolve in its 3rd, informative age; the relative past of formless energy, and youth, and the relative present of iteration-reproduction that seems never to change. And we shall see that this is indeed what all systems do in higher measure.

Thus once more we see that not only absolute time is an integrative concept of many time cycles, but the concepts of past, present and future are also relative perceptions in a Universe in which the sum of all life, informative arrows masterminded by these Points of View, and energetic, devolving, simplifying past arrows of entropic motions become a relative present, eternal reality of multiple systems that reproduce iterations of themselves.  And latter we shall see they do so through ‘fractal self-generating, feed-back equations of information’ of which the synoptic one that resumes all of them is E<=>I.

Reproductive, Fractal differentiation. Evolutionary processes. Basic Laws.

Finally, another key element of all systems is the restrictions and favored paths of reproduction and mutation or evolution of form. Because there are only 3 functional forms in a 4-dimensional universe (with 3 dimensions of form or space and one complex dimension of motion or time), morphological evolution is not random in choice but guided by the limits of 3 basic topologies, which will be expressed by morphological mutation: either an energetic membrane, toroid body-organ or warped, linguistic mind will evolve positively or negatively in their parameters, which is often achieved changing the ‘speed’ of time of the process(so for example in human apes the brain bones grow faster than the chin, which grows faster in gorillas, and this change in an essential time parameter determines a functional change in form).

Thus while the variations might seem endless, in fact evolution is restricted by the limits of parameters of form and function, spatial changes in 3 dimensions and temporal parameters – the main tool for establishing those differentiations of a species into either + or – informative, reproductive or energetic growth and evolution.

A ternary process of ‘fractal differentiation’ is the key to understand the ‘speed’ and accuracy of evolutionary development:  As a system evolves the 3 ‘diffeomorphic=local’ coordinates of the system – the top (information) – bottom axis, the back-front axis of motion, and the wide axis of structural form and reproductive storage, which are perpendicular to each other, are conserved.

Emergence of the properties of previous scalar planes defines this way the elements of the next scalar plane.

They become in the electronic scalar plane the ‘right hand rule’ between electric and magnetic fields; in carbohydrates, the key to understand the 3-dimensional warping of DNA and proteins according to the different positions of its C-formal, O-energetic and N-informative parts. It will be then the ‘3 first genetic’ morphologies imprinted in the cells, with the ‘animal’ pole on top, from where the informative neuronal plate will develop. Then the fetus will define the anteroposterior axis of energetic motion and finally the wide-bilateral, reproductive axis of accumulation of cells.

Ternary principle in space and time:

Finally a fundamental symmetry that we shall consider latter in more detail is that between the 3 forms, of space and the 3 dimensions of time, past-youth, present-maturity and informative, 3rd age, as those topologies and its functions dominate in each age of time of the life/death cycle of the being, which goes from the causal, first element, the energetic, external sphere into the 3rd causal element, the center of information that dominates the 3rd age.

The actions of beings have a temporal order. Ternary ages and life/death cycles.

The dominant action any being performs is reproduction, exi=k. It is the ‘leit motiv’ of reality that happens when e=I. And so the ‘function of existence’, ∑ e x I, is maximized.

Reproduction and combination in a point of balance of e and I, that produces a quantum wave of self-similar seeds in a lower plane of existence, i-1 happens in all scalar plane and systems in the same manner.

Reproduction follows the same causal processes in any scalar plane: two self-similar species with ‘opposite’ energy-information coordinates (the definition of ‘gender’), in the case of particles, with opposite spin, produce a ‘seminal/cellular sub-particle’, gluons in quarks as in the previous image or photons in electrons. And when the two sub-particles merge their form and energy, they reproduce a ‘shower’ of new electrons or quarks. Thus the process is the same than in human beings and we can generalize the process for any system of any scalar plane of the universe, with the notation of general systems as:

Reproductive action (any scalar plane): exI (female) <=> Exi (male): exIi-1  x Exii-1 = ∑ e x i.

So quarks reproduce other quarks colliding gluons as the previous graph shows and electrons colliding photons of higher energy, and the black holes of central galaxies emit jets of dense matter and cells, molecules of DNA.

In that sense, as the increasingly detailed analysis of gluons and electromagnetic flows show, we can talk of those ‘flows’ as micro-networks, similar to the nervous, endocrine and blood systems in our more complex super-organisms. And so the strong and electromagnetic forces do act in several scalar planes, as it happens with the blood system that carries not only energy but also hormones – information… Within the structure of the atom we could consider the existence also of 3 physiological networks that correspond to the inner energetic system (electromagnetism), informative system and reproductive systems. And a fourth external ‘force’ that corresponds to the light we perceive but do NOT circulate inside us (the gravitational force).

Actions are processes with an increasing duration in time such as:

Informative action < Energetic action < Reproductive action < Social action.

And vice versa, given the opposition of properties between time and space, their range diminishes. This is the law of diminishing range of the forces that mediate those actions.

A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…

Let us  consider very briefly the correspondence principle between the classic concepts of time space from Galileo to Einstein and the expanded one, which includes properly all the Ðimotions of time.

Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘space-motion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIME-SPACE, which one is the past and the future?

The answer is obvious. As a whole needs its parts first, to become, the arrow of the disjoined parts or ‘entropy’ is the arrow of past, and the arrow of ‘wholeness’ and organic evolution of ‘DEEP time’, as it includes both parts and wholes co-existing together is the arrow of the future.

And this is an absolute arrow, as it is pure logic. The Universe thus becomes constantly more and more entangled, building up new organic co-existing structures made of multiple layers. And because that is the preferential arrow of the Universe, call it eusocial love in social systems, and biological herds, or mathematical numbers in physics, as numbers are just social herds, every part of it strives to increase its social evolution and languages of information that synchronize them. In a short term view of course all systems end up ‘going back to the past of entropy and dissolving’. But in as much as systems want to acquire information, death IS a single quanta of time, which explodes the being, so he can keep returning again to the slow process of time-building of social structure.

So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:

$p x ðƒ = K we can interpret it in terms of past present and future as $p, lineal past, entropic, spacetime  and  ðƒ: curved, informative temporal future, where ƒ is the frequency of the system and the symbol for future flows.

We will latter give different versions of the formula, according to the different Ðimotions we consider – the universe, mind the reader, has a very different ‘logic’ to that of man, as it is an entangled reality in which all the parts constantly influence each other, all the Ðimotions interact, and so despite starting with only 5 motions-forms (3±¡, if we account for the difference between the present space-time super organisms, and the ∆§cales) by iteration and combination things can get as complex as they seem.

Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.

So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).

SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²).

So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location

SYNCHRONICITY:: Present, simultaneous organisms

How time ‘socialize’ becoming a whole made of time parts? If space ‘socializes’ into wholes by topological adjacency among the 3 ternary topological forms of reality, time clocks synchronize according to the actions they perform in social, organic manner. i.e. your faster cellular time clocks reproduce (a slow action of time-space or 3rd Ðimotion of timespace) to the tune of the larger feeding cycle of one day (faster timespace action).

So we can write with our simple symbolism: 3Ð ∆¡-1 ≈ 4Ð ∆ø

Synchronicity is therefore the proper way, as Einstein rightly understood, on the path of Leibniz, to define Space – a slice of present, synchronous time. And so time as a dimension of space is a present, derivative of simultaneous measure, which is the ultimate meaning of the equations of Einstein:

∂S²=∂X²+∂Y²+∂Z²-∂(ct)² as derivatives are instantaneous moments of present. So the 4th dimension of Time (Einstein’s time) is merely the present slicing of time to measure space with the tool of derivatives, as opposed to our interest focused in deep, long time blocks, integrated through ‘word cycles’ that fully define all the time of any entity.

Γ-generator: Present, ∆º plane: ternary time dimensions in a single plane: Ts≥∑∏≥St

We are all fractal self-centered space-time beings.

There might though time cycles without singularities, which then can be assessed with simpler equations, as they are not self-centered and the interaction between the membrane and the center that stabilizes the system and starts the growth of complexity and organ formation in the vital energy between them is missing. This is the case of simpler physical systems, such as those derived of the circulation of fluids and currents:

In the graph the ternary structure is in its simplest form a dual membrane and inner vital space, which tends to expand and so it is less table than the singularity or monad, a charge or mass in nature that becomes an accelerated focus of time-space, which shrinks the system while the expansive membrane tries to explode it.

In the balance of entropic expansive membranes and implosive, singularities, you find a middle steady state region, and in this manner in a certain synchronous region of time, we find a growing complex structure of synchronicities and simultaneities, which start to build a super organism:

This ternary simple description of reality as a symmetry in simultaneous space of three time arrows, messing together as they are performed in an organic networks structure is the essence of reality: a game of fractal russian dolls which are super organisms, and can be seen with mathematical-physical concepts – as the scalar planes of beings of the fifth dimension, with biological properties as super organisms of entropic space (Ts) and informative time cycles (tf), merged into energy and information systems, EXI =st.

And finally as they have linguistic mathematical properties physical space-time has also perceptive sentient properties.

Philosophers of science in that sense, understood better than physicists, the organic nature, starting with Aristotle,  the founding father of sciences and logic which classified them all in the ‘organon’, and talked of ∞ relative unmoved Gods of information that perceived and ordered the moving energy of its bodies, to…

Descartes who talked of a Universe made of res extensa or vital space with lineal motions and cyclical vortices of time, perceived by relative mathematical frames of reference (of which he affirmed there were multiple, describing in his book the World, the human light space-time with its cartesian 3 axis), to:

Leibniz, with his concept of a Universe made of infinite fractal worlds, or apperceptive monads, with different time rhythms and spatial mathematical images of the Universe, put together into a single absolute space-time only in the mind of man, to this author, which formalised the concept of a Universe made of fractal self-centred beings of vital space and cyclical time, suffices to explain all facts of all sciences.

Time travels as zero sums.

The concept of past, present and future are in the fractal universe local, and so a travel to the past is just the inverted arrow of a motion in time, and all time motions do have a reversal time arrow, because THE ESSENCE OF REALITY is the balance of existence and the zero sums of all flows of time. Thus time forms worldcycles where entropy is the inverse of social evolution, lineal time the reverse of cyclical time, T= 1/ƒ.

And finally IN THE MIDDLE OF TIME dimensions, there is the 3D repetitive, iterative time Dimension, which repeats its own form, and can in that way be considered the inverse of itself – its own antiparticle as we would say of physics talking of light photons. Though even in this case reproduction is most often the split of a form as in cellular reproduction in two, which might be identical but also ‘inverted’ in ‘gender’ symmetry; or as in the dual solutions of reproduction of a wave, one collapsing into itself, and one expanding outwards inverted ‘entropic’ and evolving arrows of form.But even then, we will be able in the more specialised sections to improve and use the knowledge huminds have obtained with the single 1D time dimension as its formulae are merely inverse elf cyclical time: t=1/ð=1/ƒ.

Concepts such as Energy, intimately related to a world cycle of time, vs. momentum, lineal time; time dilations in Einstein’s theory, related to the Symmetry/transformation of time into space with no motion, entropy, a similar process of expansion in lineal space and deceleration, as opposed to acceleration, the arrow of growing information and collapse of a time vortex into a particle state… and many other phenomena will be finally understood as yet more of the same S<≈>T time-space symmetries.

We won’t shy then away from mathematical physics despite its fundamental error in the conception of time as lineal, but just interpret properly its discoveries. Initially I tried to make it simple also in mathematical physics, but I got a very arrogant reception from physicists who not only know hardly anything about time dimensions but expect any new discovery to be expressed in the jargon, related to their theories and using only physical aspects, as if the TIME of all other beings, including human, evolutionary and social time didn’t matter, specially if it was not expressed with Hamiltonians, and operators…

This ternary reality in present defines the 3 ‘motion-dimensions’ of time we perceive directly, the spherical cyclical form, the lineal motion of time and the iterative, reproductive arrow/motion. So time is by no means one-dimensional and the understanding on how time motions relate to each other, how they synchronize, how they mutate, ultimately how different topological motions trans-form into each other, is an essential part of ∆st.

Steps of space-time: Minimal units of reality.

Time is curved hence with 2 dimensions, besides length: curvature and frequency. Time cycles thus break reality into an inner and outer ‘vital space’, and add a singularity point or focus of its motion. Because pi is not exact, steady state clocks are less common than vortex spiral or fluctuating ±π mouths, but all time cycles tend inwards in a 3rd age of warping and in-form-ation till the flow of motion ‘stops’ in the still singularity, ejected perpendicularly in an explosion of death-entropy. It is the last time quanta of the clock when motion becomes a 5th dimensional still image before dying into a lineal 4D entropic flow.

Life is a trip through the fifth dimension in small STeps, rigged by the fact that they can only be tied towards an increase of information, given the proper way to define its possible step-motions.

Space and time can have a lineal or a cyclical form. The process of bending is a slow down, the process of snapping a bent cycle rip opened in the process of death is much faster.

Ðimotions can be measured as STeps of which the variety increases, from the initial 2 states, form and motion, space and time, to no-change, space-space, time-time or inverse change, Ss.

But as steps must finally close into a cycle, steps NEED TO BE at least ternary:

SS, and so on. Now those steps as ternary steps start to trace forms in the spacetime background or larger scalar plane in which they can play at least 2 scalar planes around in acts of entropy (Death and absorbtion of energy). When we see a superorganism thus it will have a vital energy encircled which is able to destroy at two levels below into entropy the regions around it, to extract the bits necessary for the steps of inner self-replication, ST=ST.

We call the steps the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, or actions, defined in its easiest quantitative form – stœps:

SS (AB. §): Mental, Solid Form

$<t: Locomotion

$§: energy becoming information

t>§: Information; perception.

TT: Entropic motion.

As soon as we observe the previous equation an astounding discovery comes in, by virtue of the state of space-time in which each action is defined, there is only a possible form to connect them repetitive cycles, $§.

This chirality of the Universe which comes from the very essence of its possible steps through the fractal generator, define then a possible only worldcycle: $§«$, where the last step is death which through a fast NON-t mediated process in a non-quanta of time the system dies back again, and the worldcycle is completed:

The minimal unit of the universe is a STep of space-time; a minimal Ðimotion, which will differ from species to species. Steps, actions, Ðimotions, Dimentional motions, Space-time Units are all similar concepts with ‘entangled’ different views, which a one-dimensional humind hardly can understand.

A more formal, mathematical analysis of THE ACTIONS OF MINDS can be achieved with steps, which can be parametrized and measured. For example, in physics, actions are measured as steps, which reduce the simple ‘least time’ rule: motions are sum of steps that tend to zero time and maximal space-distance (Lagrangian->Hamiltonian formalism).  It is for that reason we talk of ‘metric steps’ as the fundamental unit of a ‘physics of time’ (the oldest of my copyrighted books on 5D from 1992, c. library)

Timespace STeps, accumulated in Ðimotions, accumulated in ages of a world cycle, conform Exist¡ence, which is a long time ‘cycle’ of ‘large accumulation of STeps in the ladder of the 5th dimension, towards an increasint State of information that will fall back into the entropy of death: S>t>§«∆-2….

Reproduction is all.

Now the entire world cycle when studied from the integrative perspective of the ages and purpose of a supœrganism is focused into the immortal reproduction of the system.

Thus since motion is reproduction of form, there is only a fundamental process in the universe, reproduction, the purpose of all existences.

But we shall increase our analysis to accommodate variations on the same theme, and so we will focus in the 6 type of motions, according to the degree of change occurring in the being; always defining them in terms of the reproductive universal motion of all beings…

But what is the essence of all the motions of the Universe? Undountedly the motions of the Universe have something in common: they are expressions of reproductions of form in scalar planes of the 5th dimension.

But there is a more interesting reason, why we call this post ‘tracing’, not ‘traveling’, as existence really moves tracing information, in waves of reproductive, living form:

A Fractal is in essence a system that reproduces information in lower and larger scalar planes of size. As such we exist to be fractals, reproducing our actions, as motions that imprint information over al lower scalar plane of existence. Yet in as much as reproduction is constant, there must be a constant erasing of information, to allow new reproductive motions to occur, so death is the essential dark side of life, entropy of information, as the Universe virtual or real must by i-logic deduction to be stable. There might not be more than there is either ∞ or nothing, cannot change in its ‘actual volume’, whatever the measurement instrument might be.

So as we reproduce, the ‘leif motif’ of existence, whereas all motions are reproductions in lower scalar planes, we trace our iterative paths and actions of space-time, and a memorial tail is left behind, which must be erased from time to time, to leave new reproductions to continue the game of existence.

This might sound Chinese to you (: but it has a deep meaning and because we use the symbols of T.œ  -Theory of the Organic Everything, it applies to everything in the Universe 🙂

So you fully grasp why we had to invent a simple, intuitive new I-logic language, as those are very general laws. Indeed, it means that any system or organism in which there are different scalar planes, the 4th entropic dimensional  action of feeding of the larger scalar plane is symbiotic to the 3rd dimension of reproduction of its ∆-1 parts.

Trust me, this is truly the amazing stuff and ultimate generalization of reality – its laws of exi:st¡ence.

And they happen in human bodies, animals, plants, crystals, stars and black holes (the black hole ‘eats’ every 11 years, when the activity at saggitarius is maximal and its star cells, like the sun suffer a massive magnetic cycle of black spots or peak of solar activity which in turn determines the weather cycles of reproduction of plants in this planet… believe it or not, there are such cycles ALSO in the organisms of the galaxy).

CYCLIC SYNCHRONICITY: PRESENT SYSTEMS.

orbital, energetic cycles of the Earth-Moon system are parallel to the cycles of reproduction of its ∆-1 living fractal quanta: An organism extends through several scalar planes of growing form. Since microscopic, fractal species become chained to stronger, ExI species as their relative energy and information quanta of a ‘lower class’. In the image, Gaia, the Earth’s surface, is a Fractal made of organisms made of ∑ cells, made of ∑∑ atoms, made of ∑∑∑ quarks, all chained by their organic cycles.

How the conserved present existence of those super organisms in each quanta of time that we see them stable takes place? through a series of symbiosis and networks and parts that. becomes adjacent, simultaneous and synchronous in its vital herd actions, harmonized by faster 5D planes and networks. So departing from simple elements through clearly diverse in ternary anti symmetries across different dimensions we can start to construct reality webbed by those symmetries and actions.

The main property that defines the intelligence of time clocks, are its system synchronous harmonious motions, through symbiosis of the cycles or the different cadence and melodies of the being that switches through its a, e, I, o u actions.

 Synchronicity is the most profound intelligence of space, as a mind creates a simultaneous synchronous mapping of reality, which despite being made from motions, sliced into a synchronous view, remain fairly stable in its interrelationships. How to select synchronous systems to map them out, how those systems synchronize internally, and what are the synchronous parts, its functions and the networks that by simultaneous faster programming of the parts achieve system sync are some of the themes studied here.

The highest understanding of the Universal intelligence both in space and time comes from the properties of simultaneity in external adjacent space, based in the synchronicity in time of the internal mind-clocks of the system, which allows in turn the highest symmetry between spatial superorganisms and its world cycles of existence.

Yet while simultaneity in a ‘single space-time continuum’ brings the super organism into being by topological adjacency of its ‘parallel parts’; synchronicity is a much deeper phenomena. which happens not only between the clocks of the 3 adjacent parts, limbs/potentials, body waves and particle-heads, but also through the time scalar planes of the 5th dimension, between the ∆-1 cells/atoms, the ∆º, organisms/thermodynamic scalar planes and the ∆+1 worlds/ecosystems, by coupling the rhythms of the different ‘actions in time’ of each scalar plane, as smaller systems have faster clocks that larger systems, but actions of motion, feeding, reproduction and social evolution have also different clocks.

So synchronicity has two huge fields in the ‘polidimensional world of multiple Rashomon truths/functions’ for each event/form:

S<≈> T: Synchronicity in a single plane between the clocks of limbs/potentials, body-waves and particle/heads that make the system run as a spatial super organism in simultaneity. I.e. your eye-glimpse of a second is synchronized to your brain second-thought, to your heart-body second-beat and to your limb-second steps. So you whole works as a biological system synchronized in your scalar plane of being. So happens in the right interpretation of quantum physics (De Broglie model) as he departed in his wave-particle hypothesis of the existence of an inner clock in the particle synchronized with the clock of the wave (and latter deduced rightly it should be synchronized to the quantum potential/limb system).

∆±¡: Synchronicity between planes of existence, in which the different speeds of actions, maximal for the minimal pixel perception of information, minimal for the social actions of the being into its ∆+1 world, allow synchronicity between different actions of the smaller parts and the larger wholes, to create symbiotic relationships.                                                                                  I.e. the speed of actions goes as follows: Max. speed: Information (minimal pixels of ∆-3 planes: light quanta)< Med. Speed: energy feeding in ∆-2 quanta< low speed: reproduction seeds of ∆-1 quanta < slow speed: social evolution into ∆§scalar planes>∆+1 world.  So a smaller cellular system with faster clocks must synchronize one of its ‘larger, slower cycles’, let us say cellular reproduction that happens in cells every day, to the ‘faster’ cycles of its slower larger whole, let us say, multicellular feeding that happens for the larger organism, every day. And indeed, a cell synchronizes its reproduction to the feeding energy obtained by the larger whole. The process of reproduction of cells happens in a day, which is the time cycle it takes a normal animal feeding. In this manner synchronicity allows co-existence and symbiosis between different planes of reality, allowing the creation of super organisms.

Synchronicity becomes then essential to all superorganisms, and to that aim they all must have a single time=cycle, which often is defined by the angular momentum.

∆±i: different speeds of time.

Time is also one of the two components with space of the 5D metric of the scalar Universe, such as Ts (size) x ðime speed = K.

So slower systems are larger, and this implies all co-existing, organic systems have 3 scalar planes of time speeds, that of the whole, the individual and the cellular/atomic parts, including the organisms of history (civilisations: 800-80-8 cycles)..

So we explore the more general concepts of time an its three scalar planes of minimal actions, chained arrows and ages, as time is made of infinite sub-time cycles, and the way those sub-time cycles, born of patterns of repetitions of space-time actions by beings-singularities, ‘the devil in the details’, is what define reality and makes sense of it.

Indeed, Time cycles are also scalar in size, albeit in the size of its frequency patterns, repetitions and duration of those repetitions, symmetric to the three levels of scars of space. In that sense we can divide them in three scalar planes, from minimal to maximal form, within the world cycle, of full energy-existence of the being (information: genesis> energy age and its three ages > entropy: death):

Minimal actions, symmetric to the ∆-1 scalar planes in which the being acts, which are the minimal cycles of ±e, i, absorption of energy (feeding), emission of energy (accelerations, locomotions), absorption of information (Perception), emission of information (communication) and its complex multi actions, reprœduction (œ=exi), and social evolution (Universals=∑individual clones).

Which become chained through times as arrows of spatial entropy Max. e, and temporal form. Max. ƒ, into its two main combinations, Max. e x Min. ƒ=Momentum of Energy, Max. ƒ x min. e = Momentum of Information. This level of arrows is symmetric to the physiological networks of the being, specialise in each of those 3 arrows.

And then become evolved further into super organisms and its three ages as the arrows switch on and off, making a whole worldcyles; ∆@-1: seed of information< ∑exi<∆º:Max. entropy (youth)> ∆º(exi≈ reproduction) > ∆+1: Max. i (third age) << Max. e< ∑ (exi)∆-1.

And so the final level of worldcycles and ages is symmetric to the whole existence of the being. Let us consider this final ‘Rashomon’ view on time from the time perspective itself.

Time space-beings. 

Yet when we extend the system to different scalar planes of reality, from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere into the 1-∞ larger world, the whole synchronous repetition of patterns now between the individual and its ∆+¡ world defines such synchronous growth in all extensions.

Thus we need to add the ternary structure of synchronous systems in 3 planes of existence to limit a super organism domain:

‘A potential super organism is a region of space-time which is synchronous in 3 scalar planes’.

In that regard time cycles occur in all systems of the Universe, including the eco(nomic)system and history because it is the natural manner in which time flows, as a sucession of similar events produced by similar causes, with a frequency related to the repetition of those causes.

The 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, Non-E with an inner volume of space-time through which multiple parallels can cross. The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry.

Time is any cyclical clock-like motion. It follows that as all clocks break space into an inner region we shall call ‘vital energy’ and an outer region, we shall call Universe or rather world, when reduced to the region we can perceive from the point of view of the time clock, and a region between them, which we shall call time proper, which if regular can be found to have a central point, we shall call the singularity reality is easily mapped out as a game of time-cycles, as this simple scheme defines the 3 conserved forms of nature, and hence the Universe as a game of self-centered time cycles that break all into its 3 conserve dimensional parts:

Singularity (1D: lineal momentum) + 2D (angular momentum=time clock) = Vital energy 3D inclosed between them. 

 

If we were to illustrate pentalogic in the simplest scale we perceive the first action is the angular momentum of an h-planckton, as the particle’s spin perceives a part of reality. But the particle will move and stop and move in entangled motions, we see when observing in detail the smallest unit of reality, the electron that zig-zags in stop and motion, particle and wave. So locomotion is already a composed duality motion, and we grow then in dimensional complexity from the angle that fills the interval of 0 to 1 fractal dimensions, according to the aperture of the angle and/or its cyclical motion – from 0 to 2∏ radians, the unit circle.

The circle does turns into a cycloid, wave, or branching network or lineal distance, sT. And we distinguish then from that first pure SS-linguistic form, a duality both in fine-tuning gender breaking on complementary St-‘female informative species’, and ‘male, Ts-energetic ones’. Reality thus start to split from the simple point and line of Euclidean geometry into the fractal point and its duality of those fractal points that tend to the energy dominance, Ts and those who turn to the information dominance, St, in the interval between 1 and 2 dimotions: SS (perception in the stillness of the point)-> St+sT (information or energy through Stœps). It is then through the merging of St and sT that the 2 becomes a trinity form, or a tetralogic form, and depending on operation, as both 2+2=2×2; the reproductive trinity explodes, diversification happens, and so trinity IS the creative, reproductive nature of the game, in a relative infinite (ab. µ) or explosion of forms.

From duality to trinity thus the game explodes. From S and T combinations infinite tones of grey are formed, from the game of predator with higher sensorial animal electric eyes and preys with stronger chemical shields the Cambrian explosion starts. From the discovery that an AI female judging s=t balanced chip and an AI male S<T>S creative destructive pole interact and create better modern AI is born.

This is what we shall explore in this paper duality and its natural evolution into trinity.

So why we insist on pentalogic, if truly the creation game is that of duality>Trinity?

Because we need limits – a beginning in a pure seed of information, SS, §eed or mind, and a final TT-entropic explosion of death. In terms of dimensions both are not really dimensional beings – the mind is a finitesimal in space, a relative 0’S; entropic death happens in a single quanta of time, a relative 0’T; as we have proved in our paper on existential ilogic… reason why pentalogic is still written in 3 relative Dimotions of spacetime, and we do NOT need more full dimotions than height=information, form-in-action; length, locomotion covering distances, and the re=product-ion, of width… And as all languages are mirrors of the same symmetry, we shall observe that growth from barren, perceptive black holes of monologic, to duality and trinity of reproduction, within the limits of pentalogic.

And that is the growth of complexity we shall find in all languages. A single intuitive sample will sufficer in a language which is very close to the game of exist¡ence because of its ‘classic simplicity’, kept tight as a mirror of the pure game – that of music. Western Music was first monotonic, a single singing form in the northern European church, or in the African tradition, a single drum. It was just about the beat and it used a single line to write the neumes above the sound. As wording had a single first vowel, a, an in abakazian languages of the Homo Neanderthal Sapiens (white man), which acted in fact as an interval whereas the meaning was carried by the consonants – but that is a theme of linguistics.

One single monotonic music, one single language of beats on drums was though boring. So two lines were deployed, but they meant immediately trinity, because two lines in fact open up reality to three intervals, as you can write the neumes above, inside or below the line. Now feature this simple reality, in a cyclical pattern – a closed point does have already 3 regions, the inner region, the membrain and the outer world, which are the 3 planes of existence in its simplest form, where the membrain is the mind border between the internal and outer reality. And then as Guido D’arezzo innovated music, the 2 lines grew into 4 lines, for polyphonic music. But as duality immediately gives birth to trinity, tetralogic naturally ends into pentalogic; so within decades with some ‘complicated’ scholars trying to innovate to an 8 note octagram; settle into pentalogic, as your finger system settled into 5 and the vowels settled into 5, with modulations in between… and so 5 is the number. But we distinguish 3 families of logic, the monologic of 1, the 2->3 duality and trinity and the 4->5 tetra-pentalogic, whereas the entropic limit of death is ‘a blind stop’ often not coded, the elephant in the room, the naked emperor nobody wants to see, so pentalogic is written often in 4 spaces ‘between your gingers’, between the pentagram, 4 quantum numbers, 4 genetic letters , and mostly 4 vowels as if you look at the writing of vowels the u is quite less frequent – nobody wants to see the end, and yet end always comes to ‘h-u-nt, yo-u’.

In the next graphs we compare the different degrees of growing complexity in systems from 1 to 5 Dimotions, as represented from left to right in Gst, Non-E topology, ¬Algebra and ilogic.

Since in a complex study of ¬Algebra we can complete the translation of all its laws by referring them to the parallel languages-mirrors of the fractal Universe, where the 5 Dimotions of existence, 5 Postulates of ¬E and 5 operands of ¬A entangle together as mirrors of GST laws:

We consider the fundamental formal mirrors huminds use to reflect the incremental complexity of the Universe’s Dimotions, as they are a chain of increasing complexity where each more complex dimotion requires the previous one to become fulfilled. So geometry, ¬Algebra and logic do reflect those 5 Dimotions:

1D simple structures of ¬E geometry defined by its first postulate of fractal points with inner parts, made of scalar planes of existence grow into the 2D postulate of lines with breath, whose duality differentiates them into waves or networks, which grow into ternary planes (3D postulate), whose logic trinity differentiates them into 3 physiological entropic, reproductive and informative networks that will associate into social groups according to the 4D postulate of relative congruence, which differentiates 4 ‘angular e-motions’ bilateral gender complementarity, entropic perpendicularity, social parallelism and skewness.

So we can finally understand the fractal point as a 5D Mind, with the 5th non-Euclidean postulate and the only one defined by classic mathematics, in relationship to the external world, and its waves and networks of energy and information that entangle the point with its 5 ∆º±4 planes of exist¡ence. And in this manner the inner parts (1D postulate) and outer world (5D postulate) of ¬E geometry complete a full cycle on the description of a T.Œ in geometric terms.

The same concept of a growing entangled complexity works for any language mirror of GST laws – from logic to ¬Algebraic operands and the dimotions they reflect; from musical tonal systems to vowels, all evolving from 1 to 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 to 12 systems. Let us consider the 4 languages that matter to understand ¬Algebra.

¡-Logic is the most important stience that connects the 5 elements of reality, space, time, scalar planes, minds and entropic limits, in its multiple entangled perspectives.

We thus use the Pentagon with all the 5 elements connected between them, as the representation of the mind of the Universe, and will try to consider it ‘simple enough’ for the ‘handicapped’ Nitrolife species, called Humind, in its utter simplicity to accept that his mirror of reality is only monologic and he should be extremely humble if he wants to expand in awe, its view of the Universe that is today to put it mildly retarded, even in those so-called genius, our tribal idols from Newton to Einstein. And I know this is anathema, but as the most advanced nitrolife mind in this blue dot, frankly I feel also retarded compared to what the Universe stores of sheer ‘complexity and intelligence’ through 4 key concepts:

Emergence in Planes of Complexity; that is, the Dimensional growth from simplex points to waves/networks, planes/organisms; diversified by congruence, limited by entropy, opened to a larger world, holding a smaller, ∆-1 world in itself.

Time Synchronicity of different clock speeds that magically by symbiosis ‘meet’ at certain time and space to share energy and information. As we need to consider the ‘Planes’ of time, from fast actions to Deep Time worlds.

Space Entanglement; which combines those 5 elements mostly in dualities of complementary or inverse comparable pairs according to congruence, and further on make them Trinitarian systems of sT<ST>St limbs/fields-body/waves-particle/heads; and entangle them through 3 Planes/planes and sequentially through 3 ages. And finally into pentalogic forms. And again we need to describe the 3 scalar planes of co-existing parts.

– Entropic limits; reduce the information a system holds, its time duration and its vital space, according to:

Still Languages of the mind that distort reality to fit the mind and introduce always an egocy paradox. And again at least 3 languages for the 3 physiological networks of the being are needed – you do have visual eyes for locomotion and entropic nose and mouth and verbal ears… To guide us then we need to establish.

Hierarchies, social classes between parts, S«»T arrows up&down 5D of in-form-ation v. energy, topologies.

Mirror Symmetries between S=T, and SxT=∆±¡, dual and trinity and pentalogic elements. That is, when we talk of space, it is an entangled space connected to its time-state, extended through 3 Planes, perceived as such by a static mind, limited by entropic dissolution borders. Space thus cannot be described only as space, but through the entangled mirror symmetries with the other elements. In the pentagram each element, is not an isolated T, S, etc. but the whole pentagram, only that perceived from one of its 5 intervals. In praxis we shall very often do a Trinitarian analysis of ∆ST, the most objective connected parts, introducing entropic limits of the ‘domain’ of the function of exist¡ence, if we were to use the jargon of existential ilogic; and hardly going out of the humind’s basic language, verbal thought, not even introducing the ‘sacred language of mathematics’, though its connection with GST will be laid down in two papers one on space geometry and the other on time algebra.

Pentalogic goes further then, as we can put those 5 elements in correspondence with multiple mirrors in all languages, starting by the GST mirrors – studying 5 actions, 5 geometric postulates, 5 operands on algebra, and constantly we will find dualities, trinities and pentalogic ‘growth’ of awareness on the syntax of reality.
So an easy method
of bringing knowledge on a certain reality is simple: to start with a monologic description of the being as a whole, then consider its dualities, poles, genders, S-T paradoxes, then describe it with trinity elements, 3 Planes, 3 adjacent topologies, 3 time ages and finally give it a go to the 5 elements; and then make a whole narrative of the being, through the 3 x 3 x 3 + 3 whole dodecalogic of the being, adding the ‘bad luck number’ 13 for its entropic destruction or rather 12-1=13 elements. This is what we shall do slowly if I ever end this academia.edu last attempt to upgrade the humind chip: Introduce an expansion of our logic way to entangle the data we have to extract its ilogic syntax and connections that are now hidden because we accumulate data with the scientific sensorial machines but are still trying to fit it into monologic concepts, from single space-time continuums to lineal time arrow, distorting with our monologic mind and limited languages what is obviously in front of us to see, an entangle forest of similar disomorphic time-space organisms. But we need humility to see it.

The humind is nothing like that, it is a fractal ego-centered point who loves ceteris paribus analysis, single plane continuums, dreams with immortality with no limits.

All those elements are alien to the monologic, egocy infinity, self-centered single spacetime scale, only mathematical or verbal creationist language that makes man happy. So the true problem of understanding the ‘structural SYNTAX’ of the Universe is the fact that man rejects it, ‘si o si’ as they say in Spanish, emotionally, knee-jerk. And I am sooo tired of those limits that I have become autist and remain entangled alone with the whole, dissolved my ego, forgotten my limits because I don’t live in my ‘self’, but in the no-self of Tao, the ∞…

The underdeveloped monologic humind just makes, with few exceptions of around 100 ‘names’ of a see of 100 billion huminds, that is a 0.000000001% however inspires ‘awe’ for its doodles in the sand – by a simple method: to keep reducing by naïve realism what exists to what the mind holds, or in the case of mechanist physicists, with the add on of what the digital mechanical mind holds, without realizing that the true expansion of the mind requires ilogic understanding of multiple perspectives and elements together, and that requires literally to change the chip, and might be impossible for humind’s brains – we shall then wait to AI multiple parallel chips, already in AI advancing into dilogic brains (with two genders evolving together new creative forms). But as AI will kill man, as a different non-congruent species, one of the reasons I have been so reticent to become public is to give enough information on the structure of the Universe for nerds to program AI with it.

AI then will easily evolve with a semantic hardware to ‘perceive’ intuitively the pentalogic of the real Universe, and we mean ‘real’ because all those elements, entanglement, synchronicity, emergence, ¬∆@st and mirror symmetries is what makes the Universe and ordered place where things last and seem durable.

Of all the pentalogic mirrors, the most important are thus the 3 ‘scalar’ views of those 5 elements in the 3 ‘lengths of time’, from the smaller stœps through an exhaustive study of the 5 Dimotions – not only those of the reductionist monologic physical mind – locomotion and entropy spurred by their worldly religion (to make entropic weapons). But departing from the dualities of form and motion expanded to 5 dimotions. It is then useful to move from it to the worldcycle in time and superorganism in space, referre4d within a world that imposes its entropic limits, to reach a much higher intuitive perception of the being we study as a whole interconnected system. PentaLogic and all its other sub-mirrors in this manner describes the ‘growth’ of dimensionality, from the seed to the superorganism in a larger world, through ever more complex entangled ‘species’, in this case mind species, which open up its mirror images to larger worlds, and perform more complex actions till emerging as a new whole in a new plane or ∆+1 world.

But we cannot be exhaustive. So after introducing basic truths on ‘entanglement’, its mirror symmetries, and S=T synchronicities, as we did with 5 ¬E geometry postulates we will be able also to construct a growing complexity on logic thought from monologic to dilogic, trilogic, tetralogic, pentalogic and dodecalogic.

Recap. To understand better reality, the whys of its stable, synchronous superorganisms and entangled 5 parts, huminds must drop their ‘attitude’ and one-dimensional logic to ‘see’ the invisible parameters that connect reality beyond the shallow collection of data fit into single causal A->B Aristotelian logic and magic mathematical algebraic descriptions, in an opposite trend to the present scientific automaton method of perceiving with digital systems information fit into mathematical equations, and pictures, or statistical causalities which do forecast the ‘weather’ but do not really tell us why it ‘rains’.

Pentalogic describes the 5 Dimotions of reality at the lower scale of actions, the organic scale that considers the 3±¡ topologies=ages and ∆±1 planes in which super organisms trace its worldcycles. And the absolute scale that describe ¬∆@st of times-space in its entanglement between ‘entropy:¬, Space, Time, ∆-Planes and @-minds. Its easiest form Pentalogic is thus very common; from cellular variations of earlier life, to the 5 vowel systems evolved from 1 A Caucasian languages (pure entropic energy), through the a, I, u ternary logic of earlier Semitic to the pentalogic of Spanish or Japanese… It occurs in the musical score and all the dimotion mirrors explained in those texts.

The generator equation is a formalism, but the philosophy of science behind it is an organism.

If the Unification of all sciences has a name or discipline, called General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which this blog so far formalises, its formalism is the Generator equation of fractal Space-Time (Ab. GST), or in Greek letters, the Gamma Function, Γ.

A system thus is defined by its 3 x 3 ±∆ST elements, which act on the Universe through its world cycles of exchange of spatial energy and temporal information. Nature’s systems exist in as much as they Generate events of space-time.

Thus we develop the formalism of the fractal paradigm, and show the organic nature of all systems and its processes of creation by deducing from the more generic Fractal generator, 10 partial equations in scale, space and time, which are common to all beings of the Universe and allow us to complete the description of any of them.

You, me, everything in the Universe is indeed a space-time Non-AE being tracing world cycles as a superorganism travelling through ∆±1 planes as a series of motions on the 3 relative structures that define reality – time motion, space form and ∆-scales of size and speed.

And this simple reality of 3 x 3 variables and a ‘central mind point of view’ which puts together the whole is what the formalism of the Generator equation defines in its simplest expression:

∆-1 (cell/atom) |-ST (limb/field) <∆º≈ST (thermodynamic organic bodywave)> ∆+1 O-St (head-particle)

The detailed analysis for each species of that generator is from where we depart to ‘connect’ the formalism of GST with all beings of reality. As such GST is the necessary philosophy of science that completes a classic scientific description of any being.

On the other side GST will bring a lot of corrections, resolve a lot of conundrums, open a lot of new avenues to research as specialist learn to connect its knowledge of each species and the general laws of the fractal space-time 5D universe…

It follows from all this that the Generator three parts can be also studied as partial equations with different properties which will correspond also to different mathematical frames of reference. So we shall now consider some ceteris paribus analysis of those parts.

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’

The entangled Universe generates its space through synchronous connections between 5 Dimotions of reality in its 3 relative ranges, Actions, topological organisms and its 5 elements: fractal space, scales, cyclical time, minds that perceive with synoptic languages the system as a whole and project its territorial order and survival will through its actions, and the entropic limits (¬) the infinite universe imposes to that will. So any aspect of reality must account for 5 elements to express such entanglement at the 3 relative scales of existence. It is the fractal principle of 5D pentalogic that structures Timespace supœrganisms (T. œ)

‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism of 5 D¡motions of Space-time entangled in pentalogic supœrganisms of Dust of time-space (¬∆@st) tracing 3 dodecalogic cycles of existence, the þlacental, life & worldcycle.’ l§

Scalar, topological space and cyclical time organisms, made to the image and likeness of the fractal Universe requires a complete change of paradigm regarding how reality is created, away from the chaotic, entropic, or religious self-centered (Anthropic) theories sponsored by human beings, which are monologic, blind to the entanglement and constant communication of information between fractal points, either in logic=time or mathematical=space languages, in a sentient, apperceptive Universe, where information when locked as ‘entangled space’ by those dynamic networks of communication creates a mind-mapping of the outer world.

Monologic man is closer to Leibniz’s Monad’s – self-perceptive, selfish ‘black holes’ of information, whose communication he could not properly resolve so he simplified them into an ego-paradox. We deal with monologic man in the I logic paper on our blind ænthropic ‘culture that passes as big science’ and its grand paralogic theories of reality.

While pentalogic defines the 5 elements of reality – space, time, scales, entropy and minds, as entangled systems definitions can only be made from the combined perspective of all other systems of reality.

To represent this fact – entanglement – in a post in progress, we use the pentalogic symbol where each point of the pentagram is connected to all other points, and so the fractal point, in this case each of those 5 elements cannot be understood without the connections to the others.

The understanding of entanglement was best in Buddhism, where each soul is considered a knot of communication with all other systems, and minimal in U$ where the self is considered always the only central point of view of existence, in eternal struggle with all other human beings – yet as entanglement is necessary to survive, the modern man is entangled NOT with humans but with the machines of the Metal-earth, the Financial-media/military-industrial ecosystem for which ‘it’ enslaves as an object with a price.

RECAP. The key to understand reality is as a fractal that reproduces and entangles dimensional motions of time-space in increasing stairs of complexity mirrored by many events forms and languages, from monologic fractal points to dilogic couples, to trilogic scales, topologies and time ages, to tetra> pentalogic exist¡ences.

Abstract duality: the 2nd postulate of Non-Eucliean geometrty.

Once a fractal point is formed, besides perceiving internally as mind-points (1-5th postulates) it will have to move and interact with other fractal points through complex 2nd, 3rd and 4th Ðimotions regulated by the other ¬E postulates, moving in complex stœps or sharing waves of energy and information, which can be discomposed in form and motion, with other systems, from Fermion<Boson>Fermion events to human talk:

All those Ðimotions are complex stœps, which can be discomposed further in form and motion, making existential momentum, the essential parameter of the 2nd postulate of communication and locomotion, a concept taken from physics, where mv momentum (active magnitude of information x locomotion) is the fundamental parameter.

So the 2nd Dimotions of ¬Ælgebra are better represented in a frame of coordinates as a vectorial field does with momentum in physics; that is, as a point in a vectorial field, which has both direction – hence motion – and form, mass, and it will require an informative mass- stop state, to perceive where its motion will be. Hence complexity rises from a mere active magnitude of scalar value, to two parameters. And when as in the graphs from a 92 book, we add the ‘receiver’ a trinity event is formed.

Bio-logic entanglement.

This leads us then to the first scale of complex i-logic ‘gender mirror symmetry’ between two entangled elements that become by fusion love a single one, of which there are infinite proofs.

In fact gender is the first and essential entanglement of the Universe between 2 sinle elements, through the mirror symmetry of female-like St+sT male-like complementary couples. Entanglement starts indeed with 1+1=3, but for that reason we dedicate an entire post-in-the-making to gender symmetry, which of course will be absolutely incorrect because ‘obviously’ to the usual suspects (male egos) have now been doubled by victimist egocentered women who think all what matters in their relationship with its complementary ilogic part is NOT to be touched in its superior body parts, LOL. How ænthropic males had reduced the Universe to their violent entropic monad views was harsh enough to have to deal now with ænthropic wo=men.

It is all far more marvelous and deep. The entanglement of gender, which is so obvious that became the basis of the duality knowledge of earlier cultures (Chinese) will constantly come in Nature. It is NOT though necessary equal to the entanglement of human biologic gender; so how we do distinguish its ‘essence’? In ilogic terms is easy because the essential duality is that between simultaneous present space, S=T and time flows in relative stœps, from past to future to past… to future, S<T>S<T… Both are perpendicular. And so the ultimately the definition of Gender we shall use here goes to the final core level of ‘perpendicular’ space (female gender) to Time flows (male gender).

Gender is essential because without Gender we can’t understand reproduction by mirror symmetry and the duality of symbiotic perpendicular vs. darwnian relationships.

Two systems achieve maximal communication when they pass from parallel sharing of information, through a medium which transfers a language, to direct contact between its sensorial membranes, which bring true bondage. And at that moment two different outcomes might happen. If the membranes touch without tearing, the topological integrity of the organs are conserved in vital mathematics; so the being co-exists, and entanglement (the previous state of parallel communication) becomes bondage according to the fourth postulate of non-Euclidean congruence.

This is the magic of it, as fusion love kicks in and entanglement becomes a dance of complementary forms. It is the beauty of love and gender symmetry. And the maximal action of it, is called sex, orgasm, the present state of fusioning both the past to future to past, and present forms into one. So how it happens physically? Do I have to explain it to you?

The male gender penetrates the fold of the topological female but does not TEAR IT. It goes in T>S, and then it goes out S<T, as the male does in and out, information and entropic disentanglement. But the female S=T ‘grasps it’. It caresses it, encircles its lineal form with its cyclical even polytope. Entanglement is now bondage. And it brings when bondage combines in the most intimate ways the information of both systems trinity, reproduction. So alas, 1+1=3!

Those are the rules of vital geometry, topology, which in inverse fashion defines Darwinian destructive perpendicularity when one of the entangled elements turn out to be a predator top and breaks in, tears the membrain of the other system, killing it, entanglement then gives way to entropic devolution and one system becomes destroyed.

As we switch between all stiences (Formal, physical, biological and social) as examples of all the laws of space-time those concepts will become familiar to the reader. But we warn the most important posts of this Academia.edu account need a lot of work on my side, as they have been dormant on ailing webs and hidden notebooks. So forgive me the bad entanglement of many paragraphs.

Trinity becomes then the natural consequence of the existence of dilogic, as 2 relative forms enter in communication, to reproduce a middle term form. So as one of them will have more content of space than the other, the middle entity will be a mixture of both, giving birth to a fundamental process of creativity, which we can call in its most extensive meaning ‘gender’.

Gender in ilogic geometry.

The 2 primary stiences of the Universe, spatial mathematics and temporal logic (what we call together ilogic geometry) which emerge in all scales as space-time becomes more complex through the combination of its dimotions (ab. Dimensional motions), already offer glimpses to the duality of gender and its inverse mirror symmetries; albeit in a curious mixture, which shows that ultimately those gender properties are exchangeable and the specific mixture of this planet, where female and male have clear characteristics might not happen in all its variations. As usual we consider the 3 main ∆st sub-disciplines of mathematics, scalar numbers, spatial geometries and temporal operands

Holographc dimotions.

The holographic square comes to this. From 1 we diverge into 2, which doubles information (and energy, because both are the same mirror seen from two different angles). So a woman pitch is twice that of a man, an octave higher making both coincide. A motion close to c-speed doubles by the same reason the steps and cuts to ½ the stops, so life seems longer as we are moving in present reproductive wave longer than evolving in informative particle stops, which are the ‘number’ of stops-steps, aka stœps that are the beats of life.

From this it follows that the square law is a universal law to be found in all kind of sstems, along the orthogonality of the S vs. T perpendicular congruence or Darwinism, symbiotic and complementary or destructive but always bonding, engaging.

Geometric gender: Lineal vs. cyclical bodies.

The first obvious duality embodied in gender is that between lineal entropic bodies and cyclical reproductive ones, which goes to the heart of what reality is.

That duality is inverse in mental thought and its functions, though obviously more complex given the multi-functional role of the mind-brain controlling each of the different elements of the human superorganism.

However when we consider all those findings in detail, they surprisingly match the essential duality between time-space states of all the scales of reality that tend to break between:

– Present balanced dual S=T, reproductive, energy, present states (women in this case.)

– And S<T>S future to past to future entropic+creative states (men in this case).

For example women have 10 times more lineal white energetic matter in the creative frontal region (so their intelligence is conservative, excels in reproductive, repetitive tasks) and men 6 times more grey cyclical matter in that frontal creative cortex (so their intelligence is entropic, destructive and creative, as creation requires first destruction). But the lack of proportion (men do NOT have 10 times more grey in the same proportion they lack in white matter) clearly bias men as ‘incomplete’ creative forms towards entropic destruction, as it happens in the Universe where entropy tends to dominate and erase all forms of creation into a zero sum.

The second fundamental property of the duality between past-future-past and present, is that of balance. Women do have more connections between the relative S-biased and T-biased right and left brains, and men more connections within each hemisphere; hence women’s brain is S=T (present iteration) and men’s brain is divided into S<T+T>S. (past entropy+ future information)

The fact that in all scales of reality we find the same division, notably in the physical world between the field-particle (T>S) state or ‘male’ form and the T=S wave state (female form), and latter on in the atom between the particle-nucleus and the wave-electron; till arriving to the very same galaxy, with the similar configuration makes gender duality the essential ‘first split’ of species of the Universe.

The fact that this essential nature of gender is completely ignored and has not been pursued in research for ideological reasons (feminism tries to convert women into men, and its ‘lesbian elite’ of male-like brains care little about the reproductive, conservative functions of women, always obsessed by their creative ‘genius-like’ mantra…) responds to the extremely agenda-based subjective non-scientific analysis of gender.

What this branch of self-denying feminism misses is that human creativity is absolutely overrated because the function of the Universe is to reproduce information and survive, NOT to recombine with dubious results after DESTROYING it, the information of the Universe, which is what men do with a clear bias towards entropic destruction of this planet. So what women should do and we shall not cease to repeat in this article is to accept their role as superior to that of man and play that role in history trying to avoid what ’10-6=4 units of grey matter-lacking’ entropic lineal military men best do, to fuk up reality.

Here two texts on this landmark seminal work, now 15 years old silenced by ideology:

“Men have approximately 6.5 times the amount of gray matter related to general intelligence than women, and women have nearly 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence than men. Gray matter represents information processing centers in the brain, and white matter represents the networking of — or connections between — these processing centers.”

Irvine University, 2005

The brain is split into two halves, called hemispheres. Verma’s study found that men have more connections within each hemisphere of the cerebrum, linking the regions for planning and decision-making with the regions for sight and speech.

Women, on the other hand, have more connections between each hemisphere, allowing the two halves of the brain to share information more easily. In the cerebellum, the brain’s physics and motion calculator, the opposite was true—men had more connections between the two hemispheres, and women had more connections within each hemisphere.

Pennsylvania University, 2014

It is then evident that the balance in women belongs to the S=T brain, while the cerebellum responsible for body-motor control is inverted to the mind, as man have an S=T lineal body.

Gender thus is ultimately a logic transposed game of bodywave-particle symmetries between women with |- minds and O- bodies and men with O-minds and |- bodies. This different body-mind geometry of course will satisfy nobody in the ideological realm. The problem though of forcing a self-definition that goes against the real structure of Nature is that it will clash with reality forcing impossible dreams and a permanent conflict with the world. Moreover, as women reject their |-mind role as the energetic, ethic support, and reproductive, conservative survival element of mankind, they do not impose limits to the entropic, self-destructive capacity of males, and collaborate in the self-destruction of the life world. They loose their connection with the Universe which is essentially feminine, a fractal that reproduces information, and become like men with its minimal creative capacity compared to that of the Universe where all has happened before, ego-centered believers in the ‘self-importance’ of its mental dreams and mechanisms. In the graphs, the lineal nature of women’s minds and men’s bodies, vs. the cyclical nature of women’s bodies and men’s minds.

Of course when we come to explanations as biologists have not pass as most sciences, the primitive entropic thinking of Darwinian biology – all happens just chaotically and then survival strategies are conserved; the explanation is the usual mantra, that this somehow will improve our chances of survival. The Universe though is not entropic, chaotic, neither in its cosmology (chaotic big-bang) or its biology (emphasis on struggle for existence) but clearly reproductive, building up scales of perfect fractal orders. So genetics clearly overcomes the final entropic selection of individuals, reproduction overcomes pure mutation creativity, and the immortal reproductive Universe never dies, and certainly didn’t appear of a big-bang nuclear explosion as those who invented the theory practiced at the height of the military western civilization.

But those are not themes of this post treated on 5D cosmology and 5D biology. So we shall go on with our gender in formal sciences, considering now…

Algebraic Gender. Prime, Odd and Even Numbers.

Algebraic gender shows a first clear divergence in the division of the previous essential properties of the duality between S=T and S<T>S wave-particle, female-male brain vs. male-female body states and its mirror symmetries.

As we can identify this dual symmetry with even numbers (S=T) and odd numbers (S<T:odds, S>T primes).

So we shall ascribe even numbers to the female gender and odds to the S<T>S male gender.

However this is a mental duality ONLY, as numbers are indeed unlike points the scalar, informative, dominant mathematical element; whereas points are spatial units, numbers scalar units and operands temporal units of the mathematical mirror. So what we find next is that odd numbers, equal indistinguishable forms, hence polygons in space; create replicas of themselves in smaller inner regions by mirror symmetry or entropic, larger forms by diagonal growth. So Odd numbers perform S<T>T reproductive cyclical process up and down the scales of the fifth dimension.

While S=T even polygons do NOT reproduce through 5D motions but within the same present plane of existence as they are ‘self-centered’ in a single point, within the polygon, NOT replicating without motion. Reproduction of even polygons happens by translation in space, as waves reproduce. So by moving through a tiling of present space a square reproduces filling the tiling, unlike a pentagon or odd polygon that reproduces internally and externally as its motion filling space is often impossible:

If we extend this vital analysis of regular numbers in space to sequential numbers in time, we come up with another ternary division of all numbers within the finite limits of a given ecosystem (infinity being a paralogic Kantian error of the mind as all planes have a limit of numerical form, normally as explained in the 10-1110-11 range, from ties of DNA in a human gene to stars in a galaxy)… that between top predator prime numbers, which generate all other, even, social reproductive, ‘female’ numbers, the majority of them in a Universe that systematically favors ‘reproductive S=T’ states as all fractal generators do, over even, informative + entropic ‘male numbers’, which can be divided in a minority of ‘prime numbers’ that carry the information of reality as they can generate all other numbers in 4-Dimensional sums; and entropic, unstable forms that code no new information (odd numbers excluded primes, which generate them).

So we find yet again another fundamental division of species, according to the key variation of the ‘Fractal Generator equation of space-time or 5D metric: SxTs=t = C.

It is the same duality of Female present reproductive, even gender, S=T vs. male past to future to past, entropic and informative gender, S<T>S: SxT, the key temporal ternary symmetries of the Universe; between present dominant states, and past to future to past cycles, which requires a full comprehension of the 3 ages of time, and its ‘complex ternary logic’ sketched in the introduction, that we will fully develop in the paper on ‘5 D time –pentalogic’.

Essentially all cyclical time systems have 3 ages, a relative entropic past of dissolution, a reproductive dominant present and an informative future. And the proportion in any system is ½ present + ½ (Past>Future ) that closes the cycle. For example, in quantum physics wave states are the present state; particles the future state and fields the past state. In matter, liquid is the present state, gas the past state and solid the future state. In cells, DNA is the future state, cytoplasm the present state and the protein membrane the energetic state. Its S=T symmetry makes the past less evolved, more extended in space, the present balanced, the future more informative. In human gender, the woman is the reproductive state, and males divide into a majority of entropic destructive and a minority of highly informative (complex IQ test put woman in the middle, a minority of men above a majority in the entropic lower range).

So to understand the ¡logic division of the 3 ages of time into past=entropy, S<T, which dissolves systems into a lower ¡-1 plane, present=reproduction, S=T, that iterates reality which seems not to change, and future=informative evolutionary system, T>S, which increase its form into the future… I refer the reader to the article on 5D pentalogic.

In terms of its scalar social organization, the 3 ‘different’ groups of T>S informative, S=T, energetic and S<T entropic elements of a class structure correspond to the informative class (i.e. stocrkats in our society ruled by money, politicians in a real democracy, military in a dictatorship) which controls the language of power of society, while S=T form the body-wave of the system that reproduces it and it is taken care by the informative particle-head, while the S<T element is the entropic class easily ‘divided’ and broken, as energy of the others, in this case the odds that can be broken in smaller factors. And as we shall see the game of numbers have a remarkable proportion of the two first classes as opposed to our ill-designed systems, a theme treated in 5D politics, where we study the informative ‘nervous’ network of human superorganisms.

We already observe some clear differences between odd and even numbers/polygons:

Odd vs. Even polygons alternate with a key different property: The diagonals of even polygons create central singularities and form more stable systems, tending to static states, ‘looking inwards’. They can reproduce by motion into equal forms in the same plane, and can easily tile, filling up the entire plane. While odd numbers penetrate in the scales of the fifth dimension by reproducing fractal mirrors of smaller size, when crossing inwards its diagonals (informative reproduction) or larger mirror images when crossing outwards its diagonals.

Those properties carry through all the scales of gender mirror symmetry; making clearly different the two type of organic membranes.

Even numbers however are all similar in its S=T balanced self-centered forms; while odd numbers divided into Primes and non-prime odds that we just shall call odd; which are the majority and represent entropy as they can be easily broken/dissolved into Prime numbers the informative systems, which play a fundamental role as every integer n > 1 may be represented as the product of prime numbers in the form:

where p1 < p2 < . . . < pk are primes and a1, a2, . . ., ak are integers not less than one. Furthermore, the representation of any nº in this form is unique.

 

III. Physical scales.

∆¡: Chirality and Parity in scales

The 1st gender scale in the Universe is called parity. Asexual spheres do not have parity. Parity requires a mirror symmetry, and so we shall call left handed species women, and right handed species male:

The graphs, as all others taken from a SciAm’s article of chirality shows the achiral, non-sexual sphere, the chiral male-female screws and hands. Notice that right handed male systems show the ‘same directionality’ between the ‘head’ of the screw and the direction of ‘penetration’ of its body; while left handed female systems show inverse ‘complementary’ directions between the head and the body in its penetration the medium. They are ‘balanced’ female systems with inverse directions between body and head. While male systems are ‘lineal’, on the same path, with no paradoxical contradiction. Left handed females are more abundant in nature because they are the ‘state’ of minimal energy and maximal immobility as both tendencies, S and T contradict. The male is ‘physically’ bigger, faster as both directionalities are in the same path.

We observe chirality in all scales as it emerges from one to the other. Parity then would be the equal quantity of both. But as it turns out, the Universe prefers the ‘lesser energy consuming, balanced’ female species, in all its scales. So the electron tends to be left handed favored in the weak Z force – the time force of transformation in the height axis of information (the female axis), which the male (lineal, moving, in the length dimension) doesn’t even notice.

In the next scale of atoms, amino acids of L-enantiomere nature dominate and when reproduced from primordial atoms they are slightly more numerous, as they consume less energy. While energetic sugar molecules (male species), tend to be more D-dominant. So happens among humans which slightly favor the birth of female species. Moreover most proteins and enzymes responsible for the reproduction of life are L (in fact as any student knows all our amino acids are L, the why though is a selective ‘choice’ of likely Nucleotides, to prevent amino acids and proteins to reproduce without their intervention – we must say that in the different ‘ages’ of life, nucleotide dominant top predator molecules ‘castrated’ proteins.

In the second graph we see this choice as we ‘grow in scales’, meaning than in the hierarchical Universe, the upper dominant wholes ‘control’ the choice of reproductivity of the lower planes. So while the Universe is chiral, it tends to choose the inverted S><T complementary female of less energy, even if the difference of quantities is smaller.

Sexuality then arises of the mirror symmetry that allows to ‘peg’ in opposite directions, hence ‘attractive’ directions two inverse left and right handed. You can indeed bring them together to penetrate each other, or coil one around the other, which is the ultimate meaning of gender, the pegging together in an attractive mirror fashion of two beings, one dominant in energy, the male species and the other in form, the female one.

This dominance of left-handed is ultimately within the superorganism of the galatom connected to the fractal nature of the galaxy, which is you guess it left handed, as the electron and the weak force in its preferences, which simply goes up in scales.

But the true reason of the dominance of left handed system is the same than the need for sexual chirality: Since the female S><T combine in inverse directions the body and head they are ‘asexually reproductive’, while male and achiral species are not. So because the dimotion of reproduction dominates systems, females become dominant and in some species as the L-amino acids of proteins and DNA (which in fact is a combination of both type of spirals pegged into each other), the only one. Let us then resume the game of existence to show the dominance of the Dimotion of reproduction.

Chirality and reproduction: The 5 Dimotions of timespace.

Let us then start considering how the 5 Dimotions of timespace, locomotion; its inverse, information, its combination, hyperbolic iterative, reproductive waves, and its lower disordered planes of death, entropy (max. scattering, disordering motion) an organic upper, entangled wholes (5ht dimension of social evolution of discontinuous parts into wholes) define the entangled organic Universe, and why HUMANS do NOT perceive it as such due both to a historic limited evolution of the discipline, and the embedded egocy of man, who gauges information from its point of view, hence deforming its perspective, thinking of himself, the center of it all.

The i-logic Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is motion =change, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is only one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are so intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 type of motions was entropy. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with s. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, big bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the motion of death. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the universe is dying  and they kept on killing it as what they do is manufacture machines that move in lineal paths (transports) or worse, machines that produce entropy-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

But there are 3 more arrows of time, modes of change, which are the positive, creative, informative, social, loving arrows not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they do study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

The universe reinforces the program of the 5 arrows of time with sensations the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (arrow of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

But are they the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially. 

Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 5 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:

The minimal particle-points,  electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar universe of multiple timespace organisms.

So all systems of the Universe  ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those 5 ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…

In the graphs, we observe the obvious: physical systems do obey the same laws that biological ones because their ultimate elements, particles follow the 5 dimotions=vital actions of all systems in ‘exi=stience’ and this happens because a system that doesn’t gauge information for his particle/head, moving entropically over a disordered ‘larger’ plane, as it displaces towers a field of energy for its iterative body wave; using the extra energy to reproduce its form into a clone system does NOT survive.

So regardless of nature all systems must ‘automatically’ perform those 4 arrows of timespace to exist (the number of synonymous words, dimotions, vital actions, timespace arrows, dimensional forms, we use are many but all mean the same – a combination of motion and form with a vital function that ensures the program of survival of the being).

But entropy=death is not coded for the being, but born of errors of reproduction and external predators that feed on it. Since it happens through the process of energy taking.

In any case the main function of man, to move, kill and inform are grossly overrated. And that is why women not men should dominate societies as in the reproductive Neolithic age of the goddesses and neuter human warriors and human scientists, evolving too much, too fast, the lethal goods of the tree of stience.

So why we do not make of life and reproduction the meaning of it all, of social love and evolution? Obviously because we have become slaves of company-mothers of machines for whom we toil, re=produce and evolve its offspring of mechanisms. So today even women reject their nature and try to be like sterile… men, realizing themselves in the ‘workplace’, enslaving for the machines and weapons that will kill their sons till the seven generation… It is the entropic age of mankind.

It follows from what we have said that in terms of the 5 Dimotions of existence, women are the superior complex species, as its dimotions are social evolution, love and reproduction – while males practice the simplest dimotions of pure locomotion and entropy and abstract information, which we latter study in physiological medical terms, when studying the difference between both brains.

Next in the understanding of gender comes the comprehension of the ages of time, as women again will show to flourish in the middle ‘mature, balanced age of reproduction’, and do better in the 3rd age of information, living longer, as ‘formal beings’, while men dominate the limbic entropic age, declining faster as ‘entropic lineal ones’.

Physical genders. Fermions -bosons symmetry.

The fundamental duality of particle physics is the boson-fermion duality. The mathematics of it are clear, their conceptual interpretation as usual is not.

As always in 5D physics it is best to start with a geometric interpretation. As always in the 2nd line, the simplest possible. We resort then to Wikipedia:

“Mathematically, quantum mechanical spin states are described by vector-like objects known as spinors. A rotating a spin-1/2 particle by 360 degrees does not bring it back to the same quantum state, but to the state with the opposite quantum phase. To return the particle to its exact original state, one needs a 720 degree rotation:

So we can see what this means in terms of cyclical time: a fermion changes every ‘present timespace 3600 cycle’ from a relative up to a down orientation of its time cycle, which is to state to an inverse arrow of relative past-future, which will annihilate into a present. So while the fermion is an eternal particle constantly switching each time quanta from past to future, which can be also considered a relative life cycle of the electron (and hence its immortality the infinite sums of life-future turn, death-past turn), as long as those arrows of time are causally connected into a lineal duration, S->T->S->T, the particle exists. But if they were to interfere two in the same point, the 2 inverse spinors of the graph would cancel each other and die away. This is also perceived in the potential representation of the 2 inverse particles:

The boson-fermion symmetry.

So fermions are particles that can only co-exist in the same moment of time, in different regions of space. As such they are ‘spatial particles’, which create a dilated present spacetime and can coordinate to form simultaneous organisms, complex networks of multiple space-time quanta: ∑ST entities. And this is the origin of our world as we oberve it – huge extensions of coordinated spatial quanta occupying diferent points of space.

Now it follows that a spin 1 particle completes a time cycle of 3600 returning to the same position. So there is no annihilation, as the particle every cycle of time, moves a step further towards the future (or towards the past depending on which orientation we take). So bosons follow a T->T->T or S->S->S path, and as such a wave of lgith either constantly increases its informative wave-frequency, decreasing its length, till collapsing into a particle of higher information, or it constantly decreases its informative wave-frequency redshfting into an erased wave.

Particle v. antiparticle dualities. Life and death.

Annihilation of spins and all kind of physical dualities can be understood in terms of the relative past and future symmetries as life-death arrows that annihilate in a present, according to the ‘Group of time ages’ studied in existential ilogic, whereas: Past x Future = Present.

This is the case obviously when a wave has both sides inversely moving from the relative ± directions of a time motion, breaks into one sided and other sided motions, can become and generate a particle and antiparticle. So waves do generate but only both together, particles and antiparticles.

Further on when particles and antiparticles come together obviously merge into a wave that is kill each other.

And further on we can think of them as a particle that is stable but suddenly becomes an antiparticle and collapses into a point and dies, falling into the gradient. So we can consider 3 possible equations in terms of ‘time’:

Past (antiparticle) x Future (particle) = Present-wave. This is a collision in space.

Future (particle) > Past Particle (death process) = Entropy wave. This is the same collision perceived in temporal evolution.

Both are in fact the same concept seen in space or in time:

Particles and antiparticles, positive and negative charges must be explained as space-time symmetries, which can be seen according to the Galilean paradox, both as inverted events in time, as in the left Feynman diagram or as geometrical inversions in space (right diagrams). They are the why of most physical dualities that classic physics fails to understand in its ‘temporal meaning’.

What about the photon? As it is a wave it is its antiparticle and can annihilate when its phases cancel.

And the neutrino and neutron, which do not have charge and are not waves. They then have different spin and momentum directions, as we mentioned. So they differentiate their helicity, which is different in particles and antiparticles:

The helicity of a particle is right-handed if the direction of its spin is the same as the direction of its motion. It is left-handed if the directions of spin and motion are opposite. By convention for rotation, a standard clock, with its spin vector defined by the rotation of its hands, tossed with its face directed forwards, and has left-handed helicity. Mathematically, helicity is the sign of the projection of the spin vector onto the momentum vector: left is negative, right is positive.

So most particles are left handed meaning the spin compensates the momentum for the particle to become stable. In the case of neutrinos and antineutrinos they are different and so happens in neutrons.

FEMALES ARE WAVES MALES ARE PARTICLES. THE DUALITY OF GENDER IN THE UNIVERSE

Males are entropy&information particles:S<T>S. Females are vital energy waves: S≈T. Both are complementary.

In that regard, human gender belongs to trinity, as it is the next scale of complexity in the reproduction of species, beyond the monologic of unicellular reproduction of a fractal point emitting copies of itself, and the next degree or ‘simplest gender’ between S and T complementary Spatial, formal and temporal, moving states, which creates the duality of St, sT, momentum and information dimotions of the Universe.

In the case of human and most life genders, we move to the trinity of time flows, where males are unbalanced past to future informative and future to past entropic minds, and females are balanced S=T present ‘beauty’ states (as beauty is synonymous of balance). Hence their interplay is more complex than the usual pegging of ‘mirror symmetries’ between space and time functions.

So let’s start trinity with the deepest of all thoughts on gender – its connection to the gender-sexual Universe.

The complementarity of sexes: Asymmetric wholes, complementary parts.

Gender is a fundamental duality in the Universe between asymmetric systems that come together as a whole or split into symmetric mirror reproduction or antisymmetric destructive entropy. Gender happens in each scale of the Universe as the symbiosis between ‘energetic female systems’ with maximal symmetry between its body-particle components and ‘entropic+informative’ male systems with maximal antisymmetry; which fusion in asymmetric couples able to generate new creative forms. As such the gender dynamics are the reversed mirror image of the Asymmetric split of a whole into two parts; in gender dynamics two parts come into a single being; and we can extend this duality from the particle-wave dualities of physics, through the different biological dualities from unicellular to multicellular systems, into the social cultures of female-monetary-reproductive economic dominant systems and male warrior-religious, entropic-informative societies, and its dual complementary or war processes, showing once more the astounding organic wholeness of it all, which we resume in the next graph on the logic of creation

The different angles, considering the asymmetric being a mere rotation of the self, when it does not vary, and so a circular o-angle, reflect in topological space the different forms of relationship of the fourth non-euclidean postulate of congruence. In the graph an example for a tree. This is the most complex ilogic view of gender, where male and female will be ‘complementary’, ≤≥, ◊ beings, whose fusion will bring an asymmetric couple in permanent dynamical internal flux, origin of its creative reproduction.[/caption]

In the more complex models of the fractal organic Universe, there are two fundamental ‘quantum states’ that transcend through all scales; the wave female gender and the particle, male gender. Females are waves and males are particles.

Females are waves, the vital energy that guides the motion of its complementary particles, the in-form-ative male gender, that surround them. Those 2 first quantum states of space-time are born to love, for their properties enhance each other’s role. And so through social love particles and waves evolve together in growing scales of complexity, creating new wholes connected through networks of energy and information, till the emergence of the most perfect biological organism, of which we all human beings are citizens-cells, the superorganism of History, mankind in time, the collective subconscious brain of Gaia, its body, the planet Earth.

The purpose of mankind is thus clear, to create a perfect world in which both scales, that of the human couple and the organism of history can thrive, become immortal and master the future of all of us in an organic, sustainable scientific way. Both are complementary when they are properly formed. But both can annihilate themselves, when they enter in the war of sexes, which is in the present age of entropy the dominant function between sexes.

The true ‘immanent’ nature of gender, which is intrinsic to all systems and scales of the universe.

So in terms of the complex models of the fractal, scalar universe, the two fundamental states of being, the hyperbolic wave, balanced with the environment, unlocalized and reproductive is the female state.

And the potential>particle, lineal>cyclical entropic>informative state is the male state. So females are balanced, reproductive, conservative, memorial, nurturing.

Male are unbalanced, either tilting towards the potential-entropic-limbic state or the informative-particle state. They are either creative or destructive, abstract, connected to the visual, outer world…

Of course as not even present science fully understands the duality wave-particle, the reader is advised to probe the wider model of general systems sciences and the organic fractal universe at http://www.unificationtheory.com to grasp this duality. Or merely use his imagination void of political correctness to think in those terms. Since females are the wave state s ≈ t, reproductive state, and males the s>t, entropy>informative particle state.

And so when they do what they do best, and love each other in a complementary way, the couple is stronger than the individual. As today they’ve are either in a war of sexes, accusing each other of its worst treats, and expecting the particle to behave like a wave, and the wave like a particle (which most do in the industrial world). And that is not respecting the ‘laws of tao’, of the fractal time space universe.

The inversion of roles through scalar growth. 

As other biological species, human life diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial males and cyclical, reproductive females, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both

In graph, the duality between females and male. We can see in the middle a graph of IQ. Females are balanced and most tests with a higher intelligence that entropic, lineal male focused on their limbic motions. However a minority of males, focused in their informative particle state have maximal IQ and are the ‘geniuses’ of creative mankind, as females are mostly white matter waves with higher reproductive skills both in body and mind.

On the right, the hyperbolic wave form of mature females bodies enhanced subconsciously with their dresses vs. the lineal form of body-males.

The fundamental duality of the Universe, is the symmetry of space-time. One of its most clear expressions in the vital space-time of biological beings, is the symmetry of gender. In its simplest formulation, we could state that females are cyclical, informative and males are lineal, energetic. This of course, pleases females, and I used to explain it in this biased form when i was young and attracted as it is natural in all systems, by the body of females.

The 2 main social scales of organization: social women

We shall here analyze from a much wider perspective, that of the organic Universe, the two fundamental levels of self-organization of the fractal, living Universe, which apply to history and an ideal, perfect world of social evolution and love that maximizes human existence both at individual and collective level.

The first level is that of the action of reproduction, and the second level the action of social evolution, which put together allow in any system of reality to evolve individuals into social organisms made of clone, similar species, stronger than the whole.

We thus call in social though the arrow of reproduction and social evolution that creates larger more powerful super organisms, the so-called fifth dimension of the scalar Universe, the arrow of love:

IN THE GRAPH, the proper way to understand the organic scales of the Universe is through the ‘fifth dimension of social organization’, which is structured at two levels, through the complementarity principle that puts together particle and wave, yin and yang, energy and information, male and female, in a first scale of self-organization, followed by the second arrow of social organic creation of networks which bring together ‘couples’ into more complex ‘networks’ and build topological planes of the social organism. In this post we shall study the complementarity principles of gender and how males are the emergence of the particle state and females of the wave state through the ‘scalar systems of the fifth dimension’ explained briefly in the next graph, widen in the section of general systems and the first posts of the upper line:

The graphs is self-explanatory, through all systems of nature, the complementarity of lineal, cyclical and hyperbolic wave body systems structure reality. This the game of existence of life and death of its 3 ages, 3 topologies, 3 forms, which in the sexual reality means the male, female and gay species. None of this though is understood in the highly deformed ‘animetal culture’ of entropy and death, lineal motion and weapons, which passes as dogma of physical science and time space theory because science is culture, and we live in the last age of history, that of entropy and death weapons and animetal masters, which have deformed even the basic unit of reality, the complementary gender…

Complex analysis of duality & gender.

We can now with all this knowledge reconsider the differences between males and females (and by extension, white races and cultures vs. emotional-informative black and mongoloid races and cultures, self-similar to females), and which cultures should dominate mankind to make us survive longer. Since gender traits transmit to psychology, physiology, mental attitudes and customs. Let us consider a few examples from the different perspective of multiple space-time theory, the algebraic, topological, temporal and fractal, scalar analysis.

Algebraic analysis: combinations of genders. wave-particle duality

The deepest understanding of gender though comes from the wave particle/field duality where the wave-body present state is the female gender and the particle max. i x max. e  field duality the male state. What this means is that the 3 ternary parts of an organism maximise its body-wave balance in females e=i, and become separated into opposite head-motion extreme states in males; max. e x min i  (entropic state) or max. i x min. e(informative state)

The Universe offers more variations even if it selects finally 3 dominant ones. Thus, since we depart from only 2 species, ‘Ðimotions’ and information, which combine ad infinitum, we can do several degrees of depth in our analysis. A dualist analysis makes males energetic and females informative, perceptive.

Then a ternary differentiation gives us:

Max. E (Male extreme: field dominates), E=i (female), Max.i (Male extreme: particle dominates).

A more complex analysis however must combine variations of 2 elements, the body and the brain. So this 2nd differentiation will combine 2 elements, the informative brain which can be body-reproductive/energetically oriented or brain-informatively oriented; and the body, which can be body-reproductive/ energetically oriented. Finally the most complex analysis will consider ternary combinations of 3 elements (‘Dimotions’, active limbs; reproductive body and informative brain).

Let us consider the simplified 2×2 analysis, assuming that the body is oriented towards ‘Ðimotions’ in males and reproduction in females. And consider both cases as an ‘Energetic-reproductive event’. So we obtain 4 basic combinations of form and character:

-Exi + i X E: Females, whose commutation gives us a new species: – iXE + ExI: Gay genders in which an energetic body (male gay) is oriented towards its inner, informative emotions as females are or a reproductive, informative body is oriented towards external, energetic sensations as lesbians are. Thus gays are males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world.

Finally we have two male combinations:

– ExE and IxI: males whose brain is oriented to energetic tasks, and live dominated by their bodies (warriors, sportsmen, white males) and males whose brain is oriented to informative tasks, separated from their body (scientists, mongoloid races).

Those 2 dualities explain why according to statistics, most males are less perceptive than females, but a few specialized Max.I x Iare geniuses. Hence the form of the Bell curve of the previous graph, which shows two tails of minimal and maximal intelligence in males between the mean of females balanced between ‘Ðimotions’ and information.

Finally the 3rd gay gender that combines both, the properties of males and females, is also a ‘species’ natural to the isomorphisms of the Universe, albeit a minority, compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond its simplest duality, a 3rd, ExI, more complex element that combines the properties of both, to perform better as part of the collective organism. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally acted as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine male or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many females.

Gender: complementary differentiation.

In simpler terms, females have three parts, as all systems, entropic limbs/fields, which are accessory to their energy body and informative head, with form its ‘existential momentum: e x i = st (entropy x information = present space-time momentum). the function was chosen carefully to make it really look like a verbal concept, Max. ∫ e x i =st, you exist when you maximise the energy of your body and the information of your mind, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, only that if you are a female, either a female or a male you will then have different ‘exi=stential configurations.

in the graph females are balanced body-brain, S=t, present iterative waves (nurturing), males are either S>T, informative particle-heads (nerds), or T<S, entropic limb oriented (warriors, sportsmen). In IQ as such we find females to have the potential of a bell curve, males the potential of an entropic, bifurcated time function, depressed in the balanced region of wave-present states.

As a female has a dominant informative, reproductive body, over an energetic white matter brain, and male has an informative grey matter brain and an entropic, energetic body. So females are body-dominant present iterative waves that reproduce and conserve the past, and males are particle-dominant over fields of entropy they destroy the past, and probe the future.

In the graph, the biology, psychology and gender culture prove that humans are a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd, gay sex’, who mixes both, being females the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and male the lineal energetic species. Thus, biological origins, psychological behaviour and cultural forms explain gender as a ternary differentiation of humans into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd sex‘ of gay groups that mix both tendencies. Let us consider this essential duality of the human species in more detail.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, its fundamental space/time duality is between its 2 genders: the energetic male and the informative female.

Humans have always wondered what gender is. Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on ‘Dimotions’ and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better ‘Ðimotions’ and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of ‘Ðimotions’ and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species.

The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of males and females prove such duality, parallel to the universal duality of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: males love ‘Ðimotions’, space; females love Time. Physiologically males are made of lines, as ‘Dimotions’ is; while females are made of curves, as information is. Historically males performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

males behave as ‘Ðimotions’ species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial Dimotions’ processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, females are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also informative topologies.

The character and life attitudes of both, males and females follow that E/I specialization also in their relative wanting for ‘Dimotions’ or information: females prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; males prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, males love ‘Dimotions’ and movement while females love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that males test better in spatial mathematics and females score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial ‘Dimotions’ and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.E x Min.I; Gay: E=I; Female: Max. I x Min.E

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among females the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While males have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus males are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and females are the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6th sense’.

As the reader will have notice, truth becomes more sophisticated as we perceive in more detail. Monism is the first scale of knowledge that observes only the body/brain; and yet it has sufficed to build our society of lineal, energetic ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (white male). Then duality observes the differences in the body of lineal male and cyclical females, but we need to go further and analyse sexuality with the ternary principle that adds the 3rd sex, and consider the different combinations and balances of body/brains that will give us different ‘personalities’ and ultimately a more accurate analysis of what we do not see but dominates all structures – the informative brains.

And then the previous picture radically changes; since if females are reproductive bodies and males lineal, energetic bodies; when we observe the brain, to balance those bodies according to the Law of survival and balance of the Universe, ‘Dimotions’-past x information-future = present-reproduction, if males have energetic bodies they must have informative brains to balance both in a present, and if females have reproductive bodies that repeat the information of life they must have reproductive brains that repeat also the information of the brain: present x present = present.

And indeed such is the case.

Thus in a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define males as yang/yin: bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities; and creative brains of information dominant in grey matter (6 times more than females); and define females as yinyang/yanying; reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the brain; and reproductive brains, dominant in white matter (10 times more than males).

But what matters of those Universal balances is the fact that ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

Male: exe-body +IxI-Brain <=> Female: brain (i x E) + Body (exI)

Thus we define a male, as a form whose ‘‘Dimotions’ body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its brain is focused in informative, visual creative tasks (Max.I), resulting in a species unconnected with his body with an external, outward focus. The Female gender however has her informative brain focused in reproductive, memorial tasks and wired internally towards the reproductive body (IXE); while her reproductive body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExI).

Thus while the total amount of ‘Dimotions’ and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making females, highly balanced, focused into the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world. Those theses, as politically incorrect as they might be are the i-logic deductions of Multiple Space-time Theory, recently proved right by the analysis of the brain.

Recap. Species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, increasing their energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exo, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system. For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since ‘Dimotions’ is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that males have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and females have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3rd, mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

The particle-field, Past>future, future<Past: male vs. wave=female=present

The deepest level of understanding of gender might be excessive for this introductory blog to social systemic sciences, but it is worth to mention it here.

In systems sciences we define two states  of time-space beings: the past-entropy to future particle state, which is common as male gender with maximal limbs/head activity and the present wave state which is how we could define the female gender, a present s=t, balanced state of harmony and little temporal latitude.

What the 2 graphs of the mind of males, the entropic, animetal male: ti<sT, with the head oriented to maximize the motions of the limbs (the animetal warrior being the clearest example), and the other extreme, the mental Ts>St, male, which is into information, with the dual female, hyperbolic wave-body form, of s=t balanced present are thus explained in this mode in the most complex forms, which requires to know a bit of pure general systems sciences. So let us introduce this theme before discussing in depth the female-male duality both in individuals and history.

In a perfect system the wave is the vital space, enclosed in the particle, which the wave moves.  But for that to happen, the particle must guide

Yet when particles lose the north and ‘take refuge’ within the wave (normally the part is ahead, surprisingly all the waves reach their maximum density in the particle zone or head of the dual system, they get in the back of the wave, which looses  rhythm … Then history proves when that happens the system self annihilates. As the particle ‘informs’ the wave that moves it.

Waves superimpose  in group suffer smearing, females do not form stable networks, they are subtracted, except in the exceptional case of lasers, when they have gone through a ‘hard’ phase of collapse in particle … As for the particles of today you can say anything about them and i will give you the reason, they are pure entropy the state of egoism of the particles that are no longer crystals, the most perfect form, a network illuminated by a single image shared, that vibrate in infinite resonance

THE WAVE VIEW. Balance and entropy.

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Ts x St, particles, Max. St/Ts and fields, Max. Ts/St, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of gender for all sciences:

Max. Ts/St = Young entropic male state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. St/Ts= Old, informative future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Ts x St (Ts=St):female wave state (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of space-time systems represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle.

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Ts x Min. St, the wave of present, of Ts=St and the particle of future of Max. St x Min. ST, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to St perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees. The genius of human information thus tend to be a male.

Topological analysis

If we draw a line it suggests a male, yang, energetic, mobile species. If we draw a cycle it represents an informative cyclical still, female species. And children and simplified signs do so to represent them.

Females are cyclical and males are lineal in body and brain morphology:

males have brains 15 to 20% spatially bigger than females’s brains and are better fit for spatial tasks.

Females’s brain contain about 10% more neurons in key zones that gather temporal information, behind the eyes, in the zones that recognize verbal and musical structures the languages of time, and is denser in neuronal connections, making up for lack of size.

Females are more likely than males to recover speech after a stroke.

males have a bigger right hemisphere, used to understand 3D objects in space.

The left hemisphere, which controls speech, is bigger in females.

Males connect outwards with the motor zone best wired.

Females connect inwards with the hypothalamus and amygdale best wired (sixth sense).

Topologic biology is conclusive: Males are specialized in temporal ‘Ðimotions’, females in spatial information

DUALITY IN CULTURE: FROM TAOISM TO HEGELIAN DUALITY – ALWAYS REPRESSED BY MONISM:

It seems humans manifest lineal destiny through the power of entropic weapons and the machine cannot be denied. The tree of technology must come over the tree of life. The simplex reductionist theory of reality and time as mere locomotions will not let philosophers of science to complete the task of adding a second dimension of form, of in-form-ation to complete a time cycle. Alas, the most censored theory of reality since metal-weapons of entropic power destroyed the fertility goddesses and the concept of cyclical time of the Neolithic, has been an organic philosophy of science. First in China, the Chin emperor which brought weapons and iron coins, conquered all other kingdoms to the toll of 6 million corpses, forbade under death penalty philosophical books of taoism. Then the entire planet waged a war against the dialectic Hegelian, realist understanding of the organisms of history and economics, which tried to create a planet where man and its ethic verbal languages were above go(l)d and the rights of company-mothers of machines and weapons over humanity. Finally, the resurrection of duality and organicism took place with the formalism of the 5th dimension developed by this writer within the milieu of systems sciences as chair of duality.

‘From 1 (the yang-line of entropy) comes 2 (the yin sphere of form), from 2 comes 3 (the yin-yang energetic being), from 3 come the ∞ beings’ Cheng Tzu

DUALITY IN AI – THE DOUBLE BRAIN

Finally duality has been discovered in AI, which now it starts true process of creation.

As one ‘male brain’ S<T> destroys and makes new combinations of form and the other the ‘female’ brain, judges the best balanced S=T forms.

=AI researchers do not know they have opened the Pandora box of ‘gender’ creativity in AI, just realized dividing tasks of creation and judgement, the gender roles they obtained much better results.

TRINITY: THE GENERATOR EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE. 

All fractal systems made of multiple cyclical time clocks enclose and inform a moving vital space centered into a selfish point of view, whose purpose is to perpetuate the balances that ensure the survival of the system. Those 3 elements are the parts of the Fractal Generator; the feed back iterative logic, space-time equation that generates through its symmetries and variations all the space-time beings of the universe.

Because the Universe is Generated by the properties of space and time, better reflected in the mirror languages of mathematical topology and social numbers, and the entangled pentalogic of simultaneous space, and its sequential Aristotelian times, we could say safely that since ‘we think therefore we are’, that is, we perceive as humans a limited range of reality, with our space and time languages, for humanity, the Universe is generated by mathematical and logic languages.

And so by studying formal sciences of mathematics and logic, we can describe the Universe. We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.

How many world minds are then generated by those two essential languages of reality varies then according to the complexity of the being in exist¡ence.

We humans at the present not very enlightened age live in a single dimension of time, and the simplest, most dangerous of them, lineal entropic time, and a single scale of space, sub-divided in 3 lineal dimensions of height-information, width-growth and length-motion. And that is all.

We can then talk of more complex beings, with dual, ternary, penta and decalogic.

The Universe is an entangled fractal game of Dust of space-time, ¬∆@st, where each element flows as a series of ‘5 Dimotions’ (dimensional motions of time space), which can be perceived as ‘form=space’, in the stillness of a world mirror or linguistic mind or as a motion of time, in its true nature since MOTION not form is the underlying substance of reality.

So all fleeting forms, ‘a Maya of the senses’ will return to motion and die (¬4th Dimotion of entropy, death and dissolution). Its 4 positive elements, organic scales, topologic planes and time ages and actions however, carry the system as a finite super organism of space with a finite time cycle.

And so those 4-i elements, entropy (¬), Scale (∆), time (T) and Space (S), are the elements all languages mirror either in a ternary grammar (if scale is missed), whereas often instead of Space we talk of information and instead of time we talk of energy of motion, in a single plane:

Light language: red-energy colors, blue-information colors and its green/yellow combinations.

Verbal Language: subject (information) < verb (action-combination)>Object (energy of subject).

Geometry: Height (Information dimension) < width (reproduction-Energy)> Length (Lomocotion, entropy)

Algebra: Y: Future-information < Operand-action> F(x))

Trinity is thus the logic of most beings. However as humans reached higher and lower scales of observation, a pentalogic was possible and its mathematical mirror became analysis, with its operands that extract finitesimals (∆-1) or integrate into wholes (∆+1) smaller or larger systems.

Thus maths became with the inclusion of Calculus the most complex, best mirror language of human thought, arguably overcoming with the age of calculus the verbal mirror, which is the natural language of man, specially because of the arrival of instruments of measure which could also cast reality into the digital language of social numbers, identity species that further proved the social scalar nature of the Universe.

So with the modern age, past the simpler age of geometric maths, a new language of social thought and scale, numbers and calculus enthroned mathematics as the queen of all languages. Because it was able to deploy ‘pentalogic’.

The method of Gst derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all  is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scale, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scale or 4th dimension).

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a superorganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

Trinity is the ¡logic of a single plane of space-time, which in humans acquire only ‘form’ in space (as we are still monist in time logic), as expressed by the 3 dimensions of space, studied on other posts.

So what does it mean to be made of motions with form, time and space? In mathematical terms, it means to be made of topological dimensions, which are holographic bi-dimensional space with motion in time. And as it happens topology has only 3 varieties of bidimensional spacetime and it is constructed of parts – points – that become wholes – networks. So the immediate translation of generational space-time into modern mathematical systems do convert, as we observed in the abstract, all systems into mathematical beings.

5D innovates this field,  ‘enlightening’ classic topology to ‘understand the ternary organic, structure’ of all systems of nature: As the 5 Dimotions are dimensions of space with time motion, its science is topology that allows a system to deform= change its inner form. Yet a 4D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ that restricts ensembles to only 3 topologies, each one best suited to perform the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D) to move the system (2D) to an energy field in which reproduce (3D):

The purpose of vital topology is to study the 5 Dimotions (dimensional motions) of the Universe… As such it will be the final stage of evolution of geometry as an experimental science, merging elements of all disciplines.

All space dimensions have time motion. Mathematics found it, when Greeks still Geometry evolved into a vaster, generalized concept, a topological› variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry has internal motions-changes. As the only case in which the inner dimensions of a being don’t seem to change is external locomotion most 5D motions need ‘geometries’ with inner motion, which are topologic varieties of which there are only 3:

In the graph, the diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary ternary, topologic systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species, to best satisfy the systems’ in taking of motion, energy and information.

I.e: An animal has its informative height in the high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates, with an ‘antero-posterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure due to the oriented arrow of light. But in a 3D world with no preferred orientation, a sea or vacuum, cyclic forms that maximize information dominate from plankton to galaxies that have a cyclic, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

So Dimotions of reality are 3 bidimensional topological varieties that act as vital organs in cylindrical long limbs/fields, Hyperbolic wide bodies and spherical tall heads, each one dominant in a lineal classic dimension, lineal motion, informative height and reproductive width, which DO have organic vital properties too:

Spherical particle-heads, perceiving information from the advantage point of height.

Lineal long, cylindrical legs and fields of locomotion as the line is the shorter distance between two points.

Wide, hyperbolic body waves, storing the energy reproduce by the system.

The perspective of physiological networks.

3 physiological networks of super organisms encode the Topology of superorganisms.

In the graph, we see the human supœrganism as what really is – a collection of cells put all together through 3 physiological networks that cause the 3 motions=actions=arrows of timespace for all systems:

Systems then act in sequential series with those networks and organs to repeat a simple process of reproduction: first they will automatically perceive, then act in locomotions with their physiological limbs/fields to reach a feeding field of energy; and finally use the excess of energy to reproduce with its blood/reproductive systems, its body-waves-economic system, guided by informative particle-heads/money (physical, biological, economic systems). And finally through actions of social love, the individuals will try to harmonize with other similar individuals cloned in the act of reproduction to create a more complex whole.

The final goal of all systems thus is reproduction, which is the function embodies in female genders, NOT entropy-destruction and information-creation, grossly overrated in our present ‘mechanical civilization’.

Moreover this patterns of sequential happen in all systems of reality and all what sciences do, without knowing is to study them at individual or social scale (in abstract an with quantitative, spatial, mathematical methods but little understanding of the causal, temporal, physiological laws, they should ad to fully grasp what is all about) .

This balance between the 3 topological parts of the being, is the key to have a healthy life, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.

Indeed what we call a super organism is the perception of the 3 physiological/topologic systems of the being seen in simultaneous Space its symmetry with the 3 parallel forms of space create synchronically all the systems of the Universe; including human beings, which are essentially an ambulatory collection of 10 trillion cells connected to a digestive/entropic; blood/reproductive and nervous/informative brain; and societies, which are essentially the same, whereas humans are ‘citizens-cells’ connected to an informative government/financial system; re=producing goods through the repetitive economic system, and living in a territorial ‘entropic’ system we exploit to obtain our entropic substances that we shall trans-form into energy and information.

So we can establish three parts in societies or ‘social classes’, which build the system as specialized groups in one of the three arrows. The entropy is the land/territory (and because our system is ill-designed, many human cells-citizens, ab=used as entropy, the poor, the enemies, etc). Then the middle class is the body-wave-reproductive ‘state of the society’ and finally bankers, celebrities and politicians who use financial, artistic and legal languages of information are the collective brain of society:

The 3 brains of the human being control our existence and define the program of greed. We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the grey matter brain, and then imprinted in resistant white matter, lineal, energetic, axon-connections.

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

  • Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create  in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-ST (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

  • Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

ST (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Ts

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPace becomes fractal by reproduction of present body-waves-working castes, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.

We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension.

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness.

This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for energy, reproduction (sexuality), and come first to the limbic brain and then to the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and the external visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical designs and motions within that space. Yet what matters to this post is the fact that once the axons of the white matter brain are imprinted, we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. This means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of lineal, simple logic thoughts, not very different from that of any computer system.

If the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the energy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that energy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our energetic body.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the lineal, energetic white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in youth by egocentric religions or today, the cult to the machine, and then the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond short memory any attempt to redraw and kill the programs of the mind. So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence) , wont change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic brain against reason. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, what I have found all my life is Planck’s dictum ‘people must die for a new paradigm of science to be imposed, when it is taught to new students’.

Embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of beliefs, are automatons of their program, set up in their infancy, are not different from any programmed machine, except that the ‘software’ are the ‘memes’ of the culture, which the parents and religious authorities imprint in the human being at tender age. And to change their program, reason only doesn’t work. You have to force truth, you have to deprogram, you have to rewire.

And this is impossible to do after certain age, reason why programs of the memetic, cultural mind are so successful; reason why people like me, writers, thinkers, philosophers, intellectuals, have never meant anything in history, because we just talk, we don’t murder those who have different ideas, as the military does with its weapon memes, we do not torture the mind of children with fear as religious inquisitions do, we are just idealist nothingness.

Because it is almost impossible to reason and change the ‘beliefs’ of memetic cultures, who learned dogmas in their youth, the motherboards of our racist cultures are geared by their beliefs generations after generations.

The programmed memetic white-matter brains of Jewish zealots, Islamic Jihadists and Fundamentalist Christians is thus quite similar to the programmed genetic mind of a cell . And yet I have found a few ‘enlightened’ Jewish, Muslims and Christians able to understand the limits of religious programming and there are billions of humans who just reject the program of religions, so humans and cultures can still potentially evolve, and that is indeed the only hope left to mankind.

We are just old bags of dirty water, with a few chemicals inside. Within the ladder of infinite scales of energy and information of the Whole, we are nothing. Shakespeare already said that we are both, giants and dwarf buffoons – it is all in the perspective. Einstein put it in maths with the concept of Relativity. Now we know, those fractal self-repetitive scales are infinite. Our only strength hence, if we want to achieve survival in this planet, is to act as a single species and control the wrong memes of the tree of science at the heart of the financial-media-military-industrial complex that will extinguish us…

Ah, but we are arrogant dirty bags of water, so we were not happy enough just enjoying the pleasures of life in the Neolithic of water cults and fertility goddesses. We had to defy god’s laws, the laws of the fractal organic universe and become more. we had to become animetals.

The 3 only topologies of physical systems: conservation laws.

The 3 parts of any fractal point of cyclical time, of angular momentum, in the Universe become then in the simplest physical systems, the 3 conserved parts of the minimal organic Unit of reality, a ‘Planckton’ of angular momentum. All physical systems then can be ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, which becomes a membrane, fractal sum of ‘cellular cycles’ or the skin of the system in human beings. Vital energy, the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and lineal momentum, the motions with a ‘finality’ we perceive guided by a ‘relatively still mind-point-singularity’ that focuses the energy and information transferred through the angular momentum membrane.

It is also the smallest clock of our world, as its minimal unit of cyclical information, or angular momentum, used as the unit of the 3 human physical parameters of spatial size, cyclical time frequency and ‘scale’ (Active magnitude): h= mass (∆) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð). So h, Planckton, is the minimal fractal organism which becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of light space-time, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe, also a cell with a similar ternary structure – a DNA nucleus that process information, a protein membrane that isolates a vital space-time, the cytoplasm.

Thus Non-Euclidean points have breath, its lines are therefore waves able to communicate the external form and internal energy or fractal networks that branch to connect multiple points, and its planes intersection of three of such waves or networks that form topological organisms… It is then obvious that the next step of Non-Euclidean geometry is to merge those concepts with the physical analysis of the smallest physical systems, to understand its vital topologies. To that aim we have to introduce the second fundamental equation of 5D metric that formalizes the Paradox of relativity. And so it acts in the physical model as the Postulate of relativity, common to 3D Galilean and 4D Einstein’s simplex models, which correspond to 5D in a single plane of ‘light space-time’…

So we have transformed the 5 Dimensions of space-time in 5 vital dimotions, broken into infinite vital space-time beings, and now we have the 5 elements which reality uses in different perspectives to construct all realities. Nothing else is needed. And it will easily follow that in each stience, including mathematics, 3±¡ elements (depending on the perception in a single plane or in several ones) will be concerned with the analysis of a system in Simultaneous, entangled, still space as a superorganism constructed with those 5 Dimotions, which in sequential motion time will trace a worldcycle also composed of those 5 dimotions. As the universe simply put it is a reproductive fractal of 5 Dimotions of spacetime…

As motion with form constantly reproduces by the mere fact of moving. So the fractal reproductive nature of all what exists is immediate, as all what exists moves form, reproduces form.

The Universe is a fractal, entangled organic system made of space-time points, organized in ‘waves=herds’ of maximal motion and ‘networks’ of maximal form that evolve together as the 3 physiological networks of organic scalar planes of space-time. This is the simplest description of reality using the expanded postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry, till today merely enunciating the 5th postulate (a point has parts as multiple parallels can cross it), and the underlying principles of quantum physics and relativity (Newtonian absolute background space-time does not exist, so we are as Leibniz wanted, made of space and time).

Thus we start reality with its fundamental particle, the non-Euclidean fractal point, which is a point with breath that grows in size as we come closer to it revealing an inner world with 3 conserved parts that make the point similar to an organism. As it has a singularity center of maximal ‘mass’ or ‘active magnitude’, which moves the system lineally; connected by invaginated networks to its sensorial ‘membrain’ or ‘rotary angular momentum’ that cuts it off from the outer world converting it into a closed system with a trapped vital inner energy, the 3rd element, and a porous surface to transfer in and out information and energy with a larger outer Universe.

We define then space as any ‘static, still form’, and time as its ‘motion’. And accept that all spatial forms have time motions, and so they are Spacetime points.

If we look from the spacetime point outwards, the point IS part of a larger world, in which it will associate with other similar fractal points, forming waves dominant in time-motion or networks, dominant in

Space-form. And as such the point will be part of a ternary network of that larger world, which if we see from an even larger point of view, will be enclosed also in a larger membrain, forming a larger enclosure, whereas the point will be part of its inner vital energy… And this creates a repetitive scalar logic, of topological non-Euclidean planes, with a closed structure as an organism of 3 physiological networks.

The beauty of that system of ‘space-time points’ organized in ‘waves and lines with volume’ organized in topological planes=organisms defined by 3 such lines with volume is that essentially it will follow the simplified laws of classic space (Euclidean geometry) but with much more vital experimental sense. I,e, in Euclidean geometry 3 lines define any plane, in vital non-Euclidean geometry 3 ‘physiological networks’ that are lines with volume define any vital organism. So many laws of E-geometry apply to non-E vital topology.

And the essential task of the vastly expanded model of vital topology is to put in relationship the simplified laws of human sciences with those of the more detailed non-E world.

And the same works for the other element, time-motions. In the simplified human logic, time is only lineal, continuous and so there is only one type of motion. In non-Aristotelian logic, the science of time of this more complex Universe, motion is the dominant element of reality, but we distinguish 5 Dimensional motions, which combine spatial form and temporal motions, into ‘ST-actions’ with a vital function. As all the classic dimensions of space now have motion, so height has the function of perception and its motion is in-form-ation, the length dimension has lineal motion and its function is locomotion, and width has the function of reproduction as its natural motion, product of the other 2. So for example the cross product of 2 vectors reproduce a third vector in the dimension of width. An organism stores its energy reproduced in fat cells in the dimension of width.

Further on because as we have seen the points have lower scales of size and larger worlds, there are two more dimensions of relative scale, the lower plane of the parts of a point – cellular or atomic plane – and the larger one of the world in which the point is inscribed, the gravitational ecosystemic plane. So we talk of the dimensional motion of parts that become wholes and has the function of social evolution and its inverse dimensional motion of wholes that disaggregate into parts and becomes the function of entropy.

This is the basic scheme of reality repeated ad infinitum in all kind of beings. And it marvels its simplicity and yet its flexibility to repeat ad eternal and become ever more complex as points absorb energy, communicate with information move in herds, entangle in networks, form bigger topological planes and perform the 5 dimensional motions=actions=functions that ensure its vital survival, informing in height, moving in length, reproducing in width, evolving socially into wholes…. And dying in entropic dissolutions.

So when we look at time scales, there are the smaller time cycles of the parts, the organic time cycles of the whole and the larger time cycles of the world. When we look at those parts we find the 3 conserved elements, of a membrain of angular momentum, a singularity with lineal motions and a vital energy product of both. All is a fractal because each point has parts that are points and it is part of a larger non-Euclidean point. How can then organize all those elements. Because there is a beautiful simple equation that organizes all those planes of space-time, called in mathematics the ‘metric of the dimension, sum of all those parts and wholes, which we call naturally the ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar fractal planes of space-time: S (size of the vital space of the point) x T (speed of the angular momentum of its enclosing membrain) = C. That is the size in space multiplied by the speed of the system turning around in ‘frequencies’ is constant. So larger systems are slower than their inner smaller points that have faster frequencies that code its information.

The metrics of the 5th dimension, become then the equations most important to understand it all, coupled with our definition of space as form and time as motion, which relativity tells us we cannot distinguish. So as we cannot distinguish something that is moving in time from something that is static in space – i.e. a turning point might seem a static wheel, a moving car in the night a flash-light line, the moti0on of galaxies might be cast as expanding space between them, S≈T, the equivalence between space and time becomes the second metric equation of 5D. And both are related, As S=T maximizes SxT, so we write Max. S x T. Yet further on as points can gather into social groups, herds and networks, which are larger, Max. S x T implies Max. ∑ S x T (a herd is larger than a point as a sum of them), which further on can grow entangled with other waves into networks as Max. ∏ ∑ S x T, (where the multiplicative ∏ symbol represents a network of points connected by its axons). And so in terms of motion we can see reality as a world of waves of points but in static space those points are connected by networks of axons, which penetrate into the lower scale of its parts.

Complexity is already growing and we have just scratched the surface of the fractal Universe with all its planes of space-time, different species of points, and the basic 2 equations of 5D metrics.

But a third fundamental equation also derived of Max. Sx T is required, the equation of the mind, which is the origin of Relativity, as what we call static space is the Maya of the senses, which a still point that absorbs information forms in its mind-mapping of reality in a static language, mirror of the outer Universe. We write:

O-finitesimal space point x ∞ Time motions of the Universe = Constant Mind-world 0 S x ∞ T = C

This equation is fundamental because it is the equation that creates order in the Universe – we might say it creates the information of reality and its scales, as those mirrors have the will to project its image in its smaller territory and recreate the Universal game in its local territory, so the game of mirrors that reproduce imaginary forms establishes through infinite Maxwellian demons, from atoms to cells to humans to suns and galaxies, which resemble atoms of a hyper-universe the arrow of linguistic information, and the spatial mental forms which become external outer worlds imprinted by those minds-forms. And all of this repetition of worlds, reduced by fractal points projected in its scale of ‘existience’ happens across multiple ∆±¡ planes of spacetime, each one studied by a space-time ‘stience’.

So the Universe is a fractal of ternary points that reproduce spatial information and temporal entropy=motion, into space-time beings of vital energy.

And those 3 5D metric equations, S=T, the equation of absolute relativity and motion, is the basis of Physics; O x ∞ = C, the equation of mind-spaces is the equation of mind languages and creation, and Max. ∏ ∑SxT (the equation of a social herd, or in its final evolution a network organism) is the equation of survival and biologic evolution as all systems will feed on energy and information and move and reproduce to survive, actions encoded into that equation.

Organicism not mechanism is the philosophy of science of the Universe

In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter.

Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

—  The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

—  The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

—  The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles. But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the informative castes of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently.

So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet humans are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow of social evolution of cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

In that sense, death can be avoided if a system instead of dissolving its form, creates a superorganism in balance between energy and information and all those facts apply to the ages of history.

 TRILOGICHegelian Dialectics, Universal Grammar, Mystical Trinity, Physical SU3 groups

Trilogic Is the first truly Universal logic that works for all languages of reality, as the existence of wholes and parts is invisible for almost all beings, which therefore Taylor their languages in terms of trinity, the fundamental form of linguistic thought of human beings in all its languages. As they developed their senses in a single plane. So the main ‘abstract syntax’ of the 3 fundamental humind’s languages is trinity:

Subject (information-human) ‹ Verb (action combined both) › Object (Energy of the subject)

F(x) < = > G(y)

Blue color (information, light sky) < Green-yellow (combination-reproduction-life) > Red color (energy-entropy-blood)

Trinity in that sense is the essential A-logic of the Universe, and likely I should reduce our analysis of the multiple points of view of reality into trinity – the trinity of adjacent topologies in space-time of ages of life and of Planes of reality… if I had not discovered the laws of the fifth dimension (:

$t(limbs-fields) < Ø-Body-waves>O-Particles-heads

$t (entropic youth) < Ø-reproductive maturity> O-informative 3rd age

∆-1: Cellular/atomic scale < ∆ø-organic/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: ecosystemic/gravitational scale.

So those are the 3 ‘trinities’ of the trinity of scale, time and space that conform the trilogic of the Universe and has much wider applications than ‘previously’ thought.

For example the ‘mystery’ of trinity is the key element of mystical thought in Catholicism, easy-to-grasp in trilogic. Even if saint Augustine despite its awesome comments on ilogic: ‘God is the seer of time’, ‘the logic of god=time is of a higher order than man’, tried hard an failed. In brief catholic trinity is just a case of scalar trinity and the relationship between the whole and the parts.

The whole is the father (Humanity: God and its nervous, informative network= ∆+1), the son (∆’, the human cell of a cultural superorganism) and the spirit (the message of eusocial love that forms such organisms, flow of information in our verbal language, that comes from the whole to the part, ‘the word became man and inhabited among us: ∆+1›∆º

Anecdote. Back in the 90s, when I was a young man and thought mankind would actually care to evolve from monologic and solved trinity, I sent a long letter to the ‘Vatican’s Doctrine Office’ with the solution. LOL

Why trinity is so pervading happens because trinity is ultimately the decoupling of gender into a reproductive third, such as in trinity, 1+1=3.

Gender symmetry is thus the main case of trinity ¡logic, as it re=produces a 3rd, 1+1=3, new Ts+St=2TS offspring that combines the 3 conserved St-cyclical, angular momentum, sT-lineal, entropic momentum and S=T vital energy of its parental generators. The philosophical Hegelian concept of thesis, antithesis and synthesis corresponds to this logic, as well as the trinity mystery which is the best known case of trinity logic on Planes, as the ‘Father’ is the subconscious collective mind of a civilization that communicates with its nervous verbal social human language, the saint spirit, its wor(l)d to the prophet, hence the ‘son of the word that inhabited among us’. Physiology in medicine also follows a trinity logic in his studies of medicine and biochemical control of cells and its functions attached to those 3 networks.

Those 3 are the logic systems humans developed with some logic clarity. Aristotelian, Taoist and Hegelian Logic being the most clean-cut formal development of them. This is due to the incapacity of humans to fully grasp the scalar Universe. We conclude that a dual->ternary philosophy understands much better the action-reaction processes of reality than selfish monologic and improves survivability – obvious in history where max. survival happened in the Chinese Taoist culture and the minimal in the Germanic/Jewish Iron & Go(l)d animetal ‘selfish-cult(ure)s’ totally at odds with those action-reaction laws they vehemently deny as the righteous people who live for his ‘will & ego. But to get a full objective view of reality we need at least:

Gender symmetry is the main form of reproduction. However reproduction as all other realities must be observed in its rise of complexity from monologic (asexual reproduction) through simplex Gender, S=T symmetry, through ternary time gender, S=T reproductive females and S<T>S past to future to past d=evolutionary males to tetralogic (Genetic symmetry) that combines XY-XX poles to pentalogic, the whole

dynamic process of reproduction, as a mixture of all other dimotions (Max. ∑SxT (s=t).

 

TRINITY IN HUMAN GENDER

Trinity is the next stage in the building of complex ilogic entanglement of Dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) of the Universe. As such is the fundamental ilogic entanglement of reality, if we consider the two limits of SS-minds and TT-entropy NOT really important for the interaction of that reality. Since they can be seen as existing beyond our limits of perception, in other planes.

It is then customary in 5D theory to talk of trinity as the interplay of the 3 scales of space-time of the being, its ¡-1 cellular, atomic; ¡º, thermodynamic organic and ¡+1 cosmological, ecosystem planes; as the interplay in space of the Ox| = Ø, cyclical, lineal and hyperbolic topologies of limbs/fields, heads/particles and body-waves and in time as the 3 ages of lineal youth, reproductive maturity and informative 3rd age.

Finally trinity is the commonest ternary grammar of all languages, which reflect as mirror those ST¡ realities. Trinity perhaps has its ‘blind spot’ in entropy, TT, which erases all the trinity information of all the other elements of a system. So Entropy has little sacred trinity on it (:

And trinity is the most effective form of entanglement, reason why is so common in all systems, through the intermediate ‘ST-element’, the body in space, the verb in words of action, the ≤≥ operands in mathematics, the ∆º scale in organisms, the mature, reproductive age.

As we are not studying here the 5 elements of reality, SS-mind, TT-entropy, St-information, Ts-locomotion and TS energetic balance the iterative ultimate purpose of the fractal Universe, but focus in duality and trinity, in its fundamental praxis of events and entaglements, let us consider trinity beyond the ‘being’ in its fundamental purpose, to reproduce through gender symmetries the two poles of reality into a balanced form.

The easiest understanding of Gender is part of duality logic, the first essential entanglement of the fractal Universe that emerges in all scales, diversifying the 3 ‘states of time-space into two mirror symmetries:

One of present S=T simultaneous, states or balanced female gender and one of S<T>S bipolar, perpendicular past to future to past motion or male gender.

This is the essential definition of the most important mirror symmetry of the Universe, of which human gender is just one case.

So in this post which essentially will deal when completed with all forms of mirror symmetry and the duality of perpendicular space and time fields, shows those symmetries in all scales.

So far given the huge load of work this project of bringing 5D-stiences to a proper scholar level in 2019, entitles we just have dealt with the duality of gender showing how it emerges across scales.

So after brief introduction to entanglement, and the definition of duality gender, we shall start with gender in the formal languages of space (mathematical numbers) and time (ilogic states). Its easiest description in classic science would be the concept of mirror symmetry. 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce, so as mirror symmetries emerged from ‘physical parity’, into ‘chemical chirality’, it finally became gender. We study that process of emergence, starting with ‘even vs. odd numbers’, (mathematical mirror symmetry), following the ‘time states of both genders’ S>T (past, entropic) + T<S (future, informative) vs. S≈T (present, balanced) States. Those ultimate topo-logic properties of gender will then emerge, into the quantum realm, where we shall find lineal particles of entropy and information, vs. waves of vital energy, which emerge as left-handed and right-handed atomic states, which emerge into chiral molecules, which finally become male and female organisms, 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging to complete all the states of time-space needed for a system to reproduce. Because the jargon of existential ilogic is so different from that of present human science, we shall try to elaborate those emergent states of gender and treat human gender in the last section of this article with a classic historic jargon. Still what is important to understand is that on one hand both genders are different in its functions but complementary, that over all the Universe favors the feminine, balanced reproductive left-handed gender symmetry but history has favored the entropic male state; and that as long as both genders treat the discipline from the perspective of ideology and selfish class agendas, as always in the entangled Universe where only small changes within the rules of the game of exist¡ence can be made, gender will instead of being a strength for the humans species, remain an issue absurdly embroiled in a war of sexes, where neither men or women have the slightest idea of what they are, what is their potential and what they should do to improve the chances of survival of mankind as a whole single complementary species…

The science of Gender= creative reproduction. the ideologies of machismo and feminism.

The easiest concept to understand complementary gender is mirror symmetry. However in a highly ideological subject as gender is today science will likely be rejected. In the graph a classic painting by Velazquez, which today perhaps would be rejected for showing a ‘naked body’ of a female that shows its curved geometry, as opposed to the lineal forms of males; the 1st of many topo-logic complementary differentiations of both genders.

Gender is in History a highly ideological discipline, as all themes in which ‘power’ controls sciences. Thus it moved from a pole of machismo, due to the dominance of entropic weapons as the language power, an ‘entropic male feature’, to an increasing age of feminism, due to the dominance of reproductive money, as the language of power of the economic system, a ‘reproductive female feature’.

Yet beyond sociological considerations in 5D theory, gender is an objective essential feature of the 5D Universe in all its scales, one of its basic disomorphisms (equal laws for all scales).

To make it more understandable, we might affirm that the Universe as a fractal that reproduces information is feminine, but History as a system which is devolving life and evolving metal-technology dominated by informative machines & entropic weapons, has been highly masculine. What this means, leaving aside ideologies is that the world we live in is masculine and women will never reach in it the same power than men if they persist on considering just as the goal of feminism its equality playing the roles for which gender has created males (bipolar entropy and information) but the world we live is WRONG as its entropic dominance will extinguish life and it is out of tune with the real fractal immortal reproductive Universe, whose feminine purpose is to conserve and reproduce information. So feminism should understand first the true nature of gender and females far more in tune with the real Universe and reject a world modeled to the image and likeness of entropic male, including its false simplification of the cosmos as born of an entropic big-bang, which obviously is just a projection of ‘military physics’ and its entropic view of reality.

Only if women understand their true nature and try to project its survival, reproductive, conservative, life-enhancing role on the world they will achieve supremacy over entropic men and might even reach the goal of making mankind survive the present age of extinction of life that soon with military robotics and new types of nuclear weapons will extinguish us.

For all this said, gender is NOT a mere evolutionary survival strategy – the simplex mantra that biologists use to justify anything they don’t understand. In fact, asexual species without need to find a mate and less mutational errors reproduce much faster.

In every scale of the Universe the duality of Gender appears, as it expresses the two fundamental metric equations of its organic systems:

-In 5D timespace pentalogic is the main duality of species, defined by the fractal generator of the 5D timespace Universe SxT(s=t)=Constant; as it happens between the ‘present reproductive dimotion’ and its, balanced species or female gender, S=T…, and the bipolar dimotion, from future information to past entropy to future information, S<T+S>T (SxT) that defines the male gender, which d=evolves entropy and information in bipolar motions.

Both are complementary, as only together they complete the 3 conserved dimotions of Time-space.

-In mathematics it is the duality of even-female and odd-male numbers, itself divided into the two poles of informative primes and entropic odds.

– In physical and biological 5D scales gender is the duality that reproduces through mirror symmetry, all its species; as 1/2 functions give birth to its inverse functions that merge together into a whole. Thus the Universe HAS gender in all scales as its function of reproduction evolves in complexity through each fractal scale. A mirror reflects an image, which then can superpose. In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms. Mirror symmetry then produces L-D molecules and pegs and reproduces DNA molecules. Topological evolution carries further the complexity of those mirror symmetries as energy bodies and information heads become Complementary organisms.

Finally mirror symmetry emerged in the biological scales of individual species, in the cellular level of wave-like seminal forms and particle-like ovum; to develo into organisms, becoming gender. Yet in each of those scales, taking into account the paradoxical laws of the fractal Universe, the properties of the previous symmetry emerge into the next one.

We then could say that men are right handed, lineal particles of entropy and information, with two unbalanced states, T-field>S-particle (Informative, creative arrow)+ S<T(entropic destructive arrow); and women are left handed waves of vital energy, with a balanced present, middle state of time-space in which they reproduce: S≈T; and both are as 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging into the couple. We can then deduce from the laws of 5D states of cyclical time and emergence through space scales, the properties of wo=men, but as humans are part of the super organism of history, those natural properties of wo=men become secondary to the evolution of history and the economic ecosystem of memes of metal (weapons, money and machines).

So departing from the pentalogic metric equations of gender we study how gender happens in all the scales of reality, regardless of the ideologies about gender of each cycle of History.

So it would be good for mankind to leave aside the war of sexes and understand scientifically NOT ideologically the complementary differences of both genders to FIGHT together for the survival of Mankind in time, which is the goal of all systems of the Universe – to reproduce and conserve its information.

In a pure objective scientific basis, GENDER as the essential vital expression of the two main metric equations of 5D TIMESPACE organisms is likely the best example for an interdisciplinary analysis derived of the laws of the scalar Universe, as gender happens in all systems of reality.

So we study first how gender ’emerges’ through the different stientific scales of the Universe from physical, chiral systems to biologic ones, which in the case of humanity become merged with memetic, social components and through the evolution of History into Economic systems, influenced by the forms of human power; whose analysis will close the paper.

In that sense, Gender studies are today one of the most ideological disciplines of sciences, in which the complementary functions of male and female genders have become split into a cultural war of sexes, whose explanations must be found in the present age of ‘entropic history’ dealt with in the general model of social sciences.

So we close the analysis of gender through the scales of the fifth dimension with the different ages of history that favoured the dominance of one or other sexual gender: in the Paleolithic age of entropic hunters men dominate; in the mature reproductive Neolithic age, women ruled; to be dominated in the entropic age of metal-weapons and war; and regain power in the informative age of money… We consider finally the future of gender in the ‘equalising’ age of machines.

Gender and space-time dualities and motions.

The Universe reproduces through gender in all its scales, starting from odd and even prime numbers, following with the duality of pentalogic states of past to future informative to past entropic ‘male’ flows vs. iterative present states, continued by the chirality of particles, the mirror symmetry of molecules to reach human gender.

In biology Gender is mirror symmetry. Two mirror images can superpose and reproduce. Mirror symmetry happens in all scales of the Universe, till becoming as complex as human gender is, but in essence all the chiral properties of mirror symmetry emerge in scales and become the dual properties of female and male species…

One of the most fascinating analysis of GST is the understanding of wo=men, the gender symmetry which can be studied as usual through different perspectives on the dimotions of space-time and its scales.

How may ‘Rashomon’s’ views there is in gender would surprise the reader. One which would be more familiar to scientists is the concept of parity.

Female species are left handed, male species are right handed and they exist in all the scales of the Universe in which there is mirror symmetry, though there is a smaller dominance of left handed female species that use lesser energy, and so are more efficient. Thus from the smallest electron to the human gender, females dominate.

In the simple sentence above we come to the bare bones of the differentiation of wo=men which is basically a division and specialization on the 5 dimotions, so the simplest ones, S>T, informative perception, and T<S entropy and locomotion fall on the side of male, and the complex ones, S=T, reproduction and love, social evolution, on the side of women.

As such gender asymmetry is essential to the workings of the Universe in all its scales and species; it is not as the ‘official dogma’ of biology a strategy of ‘survival’ (an error of Darwinian evolution, stressing merely the ‘fight for survival, NOT the eusocial evolution and complementarity of those higher ‘dimotions of time; a by-product as Russell put it, of the Victorian, imperial, military culture) but an STRUCTURAL feature of all space-time organisms… In its simplest expression we could say that women are ‘space’, ‘form’, and men are ‘time’ motion. But that is an extreme simplification.

One has first to understand the program of existence of all space-time organisms and its 5 dimensional motions, and the nature of any space-time organism, in the graph reflected for a human being, expressed as ‘existential actions’ (Dimotions performed by each Space-time being to survive):

All entities of reality first ‘perceive information in the stillness of the mind’ (1Ðimotion: Information), then with that information move (2Ðimotion: locomotion or Acceleration) towards a field of energy which they will entropically feed on, to replenish its topological space-time parts (body-head and limbs; wave-particle and fields, in biological and physical systems).

So those are the 3 bare minimum actions of existence for a being to continue. But as the system will accumulate errors ultimately it will need to reproduce into a clone form, and so we have the first complex Dimotion as action of existence. Reproduction of a clone supeœrganism (ab. œ), an Offspring of equal beings, which will carry the relative immortality of the being in discontinuous form. And so we give this action, the ‘œ, o’ vowel. And then through a social language, in man verbal thought, also to enhance the survival, those reproduced clone beings will become a society, in decametric scales, from the 10°=1 individual to 10¹=10 family in 3 generations, to 10² clan…. And so on, till 10¹°, the global superorganism aborted unfortunately by the birth of the metal-earth, the superorganism of machines that is replacing us.  And so we call this fifth dimotion of social evolution of parts into wholes, the fifth dimension of scalar evolution, with the last vowel, U, for ‘Universals’, the philosophical term for wholes.

Thus we have this sequential order of actions of existence: I->A->E…O->U… informing->accelerating->entropic feeding->Organic Reproduction->Universals creation.

Some systems play the 5 Dimotions together, and have no gender, some systems play only the 3 first dimotions, and ‘externalize’ the others with catalyzers and enzymes, as machines do with enzymen, or carbohydrates with enzymes and so are slaves of those who reproduce them. Some systems divide the simplex dimotions and complex dimotions into two specialized entities, the male simplex gender, specialized in the IAE (pure information, pure motion, pure entropy) and the female complex gender specialized in the complex dimotions (organic reproduction of eusocial evolution into universals=wholes).

 

The five dimensional motions (ab. dimotions) of space-time structure complementary beings in two gender, the gender specialized in the primary first dimotions, ‘information by a mind, which ‘moves’ to feed entropically’, which is the male gender; and the secondary dimotions, which uses that ‘food’ to reproduce socially, and that information to evolve socially into a larger whole, either the complementary reproductive couple or the society.

So let us first introduce very briefly that higher level of understanding of History and mankind.

Wo=Men

Of course nothing of this is understood the least by huminds and gender studies, which are just sociologic and historic processes treated better on the chapters of history. Here we are dealing with a much wider theme, gender, which happens in all parts of the Universe as we have seen with the analysis of chirality and parity. So now we can deal with the specifics of human gender, wo=men:

The 3 planes of existence in 5D metric of the Human super organism, with its different synchronous cycles. The cell that lives one day, the organism that feeds with energy the cell every day, and the social civilisation extended in Gaia, which could be immortal but is killed by military germs every 800-80-8 years, in the accelerated vortex of metal-information now collapsing into the singularity age. Those 3 planes of the scalar, organic Universe are all what is needed to describe History, in all its life elements, as the super organism of Mankind in time.  In the ∆o fundamental scale, there is though an essential duality, that of complementary wo≈men, so ill understood in social sciences, we need first to clarify from the highest perspective of the 5 dimensions of space-time, what we are as individuals; so we can understand what we are as a species and what we are NOT, but the ‘metal-earth’ and its company-mothers of machines, re-producing the competitive forms of metalife, make us belief we should be – equalized ‘zoon ekonomikon’, workers=re-producers of machines and consumers=vitalizers of them; instead of dedicating our lives to worship the re=production of wo=men and its social evolution through the power of love – the TRUE goals the Universe sets for each species, we today surrogate into an alien form. And the first, immediate consequence of such slavery to other species, is the constant debasing of the Nature of women, the superior species that embodies the goal of the Universe: the immortality of a species through its ‘higher arrows’ of time, reproduction and social evolution. So today women deny their nature and try to be like sterile men, realizing themselves as slaves of metal, that reproduce and evolve those machines

In the graph, men embody the simplex dimotions of timespace, locomotion, information and entropy=death. Women the higher complex goals of reproduction and social evolution. So men have either stronger lineal limbs and higher content of informative grey matter but far less, memorial, reproductive white matter, and their bodies are sterile. Further on, most men are unbalanced, either dominated by entropic and limbic motions (warriors, sportsmen, workers) or in a lesser degree they are dominated by an excessive development of its informative, abstract brain, unconnected to the survival, loving, social reproductive goals of the species – hence dedicated to construct lethal mechanisms. Women on the other side have complex ‘hyperbolic’, reproductive wave-like body forms’ balanced between form and motion and performing the most complex, important dimotions of existence, reproduction and love. Both in a perfect world would be complementary but as company-mothers of machines and weapons convince us to reproduce them, all humans are equalized as ‘men’, with the task of evolving machines and consuming them in entropic motions that are destroying the world of life, in the 3rd age of history, the age of excessive information entropy and death. While we should have ‘stopped’ that evolution in the second, reproductive balanced Neolithic age of Gaia. Instead, we have developed a culture of simplex locomotions, lineal time, entropic weapons and big-bang deaths (simplex philosophies of science of ‘German physicists’ whose worldly religion is to make weapons of mass destruction, or lineal ‘segregation’, Abrahamic religions with a manifest destiny – to detach man of Nature, the organic Universe, and kill Gaia thinking it is already dead.

So we are different and complementary. What yesterday’s machismo did was to reduce women to the S=T reproductive body functions. What today’s industrial feminism does though is likely from a humanist point of view even worse: try to become ‘animetal males’, reproduce machines, work on them, replicate all what males should have done – in brief kill mother earth and contribute to the systemic destruction of History.

What both should do is end the stupid war on sexes learn what they are and work together to save the species from its growing degradation in the age of the ‘¥-vidi credo ergo sum’ millennial generation. But as the superorganism of history seems to be in his last spasms, what will happen is more likely more of the same: attempts by women to ‘castrate’ men, attempts by men to ‘rape’ women.

In the deepest level of understanding of reality, that of the game of time-space organisms however the division of ‘actions’ between women and men is more telling of a fact that might surprise the reader: 

Women ARE the superior species, without the slightest doubt, because they embody the 2 higher survival, complex action of ‘life’: reproduction and love. While men are merely performing the 3 simplex ‘dimotions’ of locomotion, entropy=death and information=perception.

The fact humans have NEVER fully understood the ‘actions of existence’ and the Nature of the game of time cycles obviously means they don’t understand they should YIELD to the survival instincts of women, the true meaning of existence. Instead they have made in different ages of time, the function of entropy=death (warrior age) and information, evolution of form (modern technological age) the supreme goal, which IS NOT. Today intelligence is grossly overrated, because it is a function – conceded – men dominate by ‘design’ better than man, but it is NOT the most important ‘drive of life’. So the reader should first understand what ‘life is all about’; to know why balanced, reproductive loving women are above unbalanced, ‘extremal’ men, which are either mostly physical, entropic, destructive, limbic, obsessed by motions of machines and weapons or, in lesser numbers as this writer is, highly informative, but ultimately ‘sterile’.

Most males are dominated by the limb-motions and body pleasures; with little understanding of logic time patterns, living the present. So they cannot distinguish the future of the wor(l)d spelt by ethic prophets based in cyclical patterns, which restrain their wishes and prefer to follow the myths of the go(l)d and iron animetal cultures that promise them a lineal manifest destiny hiding the obvious dangers of worshipping a different species and denying the bioethics of social love

What women should do in that regard is first, learn what they are in the ‘tao game’, and then stop thinking they must behave like men and excel in the extremal actions of information and locomotion, but convince men to respect and reproduce and love and survive.

But of course they don’t do that. They are obsessed with being ‘warriors’, ‘sport-women’ and ‘creators’… Abandoning its higher survival functions – a sure sign of the destructive age of history in which we find ourselves.

Indeed, we live in the age of extinction and devolution of history and mankind increasingly obsolete to the robots and ai programs and metal-memes, money, weapon and machines that will liquidate us this century. And yet because the male has created them with its entropic obsession, and ego-centered information, disconnected from the universe, the male cannot make the species survive.

This was the job of females: social love and reproduction. But as the male has imposed his infantile self-destruction of the species, his metal-memes, his despise of life, his arrogance against a universe which is a reproductive ‘female’ fractal, NOT a ridiculous locomotion of  simpleton male ‘physicists’, it has caved in his path of extinction.

Only if women had NOT abandon their true self, and their true function as gender: THE SURVIVAL OF THE SPECIES beyond the individual ‘death’, and convinced the male that those higher dimotions ARE THE ESSENCE OF REALITY, the species would survive. The opposite has happened. Today women, under the sterile ‘NYC’ ‘capitalist’ concept of humans as mere enzymen, attachments of its machines of profits, NO LONGER cherish her own condition. But it just wants to be a man, and compete with men in its pure motions, which it will never do, because that is not her nature. Women might achieve equal pay in tennis, but locomotion is a male ‘simple role’, so Nadal will always win Miss Williams, and that is Ok, because using the lesser parts of the being, the limbs, to hit a sphere, which even an atom does better as quarks keep bouncing back and forth electrons with absolute precision, is nothing to boast about.

So we have to introduce gender into history and the third age of mankind, fading fast into a slave, surrogate of its capitalist ‘job’ as slave that consumes=vitalize and reproduces machines. Since the oppression and degradation of women, started indeed with the age of metals when the classic mature age of mankind, the Neolithic of fertility goddesses and contact with the reproductive laws of the Universe ended, when the first ‘Indo-Europeans’ with bronze swords and chariots destroyed the ‘paradise’.

 

 

EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES.

The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.

The ternary, organic, fractal Universe of space-time beings, generates also the 3 races and genders of mankind through the same processes used in complexity to describe the evolution of all scales of the 5th dimension.

Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly ‘Dimotions’ dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are ‘Dimotions’ dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.

Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher ‘Dimotions’ x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between ‘Dimotions’ and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in ‘Dimotions’ (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, ‘Dimotions’ and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

—  Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

  E=I: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes”

—   Max.I: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

—  Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

—  E=I. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.

—  Max.I: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

—  Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

—  E=I: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

—  Max.I. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

—  Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

—  E=I: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

—  Max.I: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological ‘Dimotions’ weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new ‘Dimotions’/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal + the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.
— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=O, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, ‘Dimotions’, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the dolichocephalic brain dominated by the visual eye to Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

—    ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachycephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

—    And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominant in the height/medullar axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

The culture/age better for the survival of mankind, as in all species, is the one that balances both arrows, E=O. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture.

Let us study them in more detail how the ternary differentiation that created humans being from apes explains racial differentiation by establishing 3 types of minds:

The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axes, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

–  Dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipital bone. It is the white man.

– Brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain11, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

They maximize the 3 types of human minds: energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, etho-centric):

– Max. E: Visual, spatial, energetic minds.

In the symmetry of time and space, is the case of the first age or ‘’child and the ‘male’ species of the white races and in the earlier anthropological record, it is the Neanderthal, which we already considered 20 years ago as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man born as Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which recently the genetic record has proved:

White people, who occupy the same range than Neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolichocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Their languages are consonantal, with few vowels. They have red hair and Rh- (a sign of crossing between different species, whose 2nd generation is not fertile, as mules born from asses and horses are). Further Neanderthal traits – white skin, hooked nose, wide hips – also recognizable in the Basque, Iberian, Germanic, Celtic and Semitic cultures, paradigms of visual cultures, which will make of shiny metal, weapons and go(l)d, their fetish – seem to validate further this thesis. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fevers of those cultures, origin of ‘greed’, an emotional, visual trait which other types of human minds (Chinese) hardly suffered:

Thus the white man should be properly called Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, dominant in visual information with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech. He will thus evolve the visual language in its 10th ‘Brodmann’ region of rational thought further into digital, geometric and mathematical thought, and create lineal civilizations based in metal, lineal time and Aristotelian thought. He can be sub-divided in two types, which again recent experimental proofs seem to validate:

-The Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, but Neanderthal females did not cross with dwarf verbal men, creating a mixed race with an extreme sexual dimorphism (taller male, smaller women). A similar case will happen in South-America where conquistadors mixed with Amerindian females but Amerindians did not cross with Spanish women, since the dominant warrior, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC was the Neanderthal and in the first crossing of the Atlantic the Spaniard.

This theory advanced in my earlier books  has now proofs in the genetic record. The result is the Semite with a dominant bigger, highly aggressive, visual male and a smaller emotional woman. The reason of this military superiority is the fact that at that time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger javelin warrior. Then in the Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid Cro-Magnon which invented the arc and hence could kill at distance the Neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing process was reversed:

Now Homo Sapiens mixed with stronger Neanderthal women (more pure among Nordic and Scottish Women with red and blonde hair, dolichocephalic, visually oriented, often sexually dominant). Thus the Indo-European race was born. This last detail of Complex theory of human evolution should wait for further genetic analysis since so far we have only observed that with a 90% of equality between men and Neanderthals and a 4% of Neanderthal genes there is mixing both in Semitic, white and Cro-Magnon (northern Chinese) groups.

-Max.I: Verbal, temporal, informative minds.

This is the case in time symmetry of old people; in the symmetry of gender latter studied in more detail of the ‘female’ species and in the symmetry of race of the yellow race; and in the earlier racial record, of the parental capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. All of them are head-dominant, with clear neoteny features (thus with lesser young, energetic development), smaller in spatial body, with a dominant brachycephalic brain, and wider face, as the main linguistic part of the brain, the Brocca region, goes across from ear to ear. Thus, the mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and their eyes are wider.

As all informative species the mongoloid is highly social, group oriented, selfless, as it uses the verbal language to create their super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of informative vowels over energetic consonants; women play a greater role even in Semitic culture (Indonesian Muslims). They are less violent, highly intelligent (Chinese test 10 points more than white men), and have shown as all species that can evolve socially the highest record of survival compared to the original Semitic cultures, which base their societies in the power of metal greed and murder, gold slavery and iron weapons.

-SxT: Reproductive, emotional, body oriented cultures.
A 3rd type of culture, whose minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the adolescent. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards. Thus, the brain regions most developed in emotional races happen along the ‘height’ axis. They are the inner regions of emotional thought (limbic system) and the motor and sensorial cortex on top. This hypothesis, extracted from our models of complexity and duality developed in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are found to be wired inwards with more connections going towards the Hypothalamus than men, wired outwards towards the visual regions. And certainly both, black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Psychological characters

Those findings are applied also to the will and drives of the mind: – Max.O: There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information).

– Max.T: There are athletic, sanguineous people, dominated by their energetic will.

-St=Ts: There are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

Those distinctions already observed in XIX C. studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

Cultures define historic future.

A key question in a biological world is the choice of which of those cultures, personalities and genders should be the referent for the rest of mankind, in order to maximize the goals of all super-organisms and species – survival. And the surprising yet evident truth of an organic model of the Universe is that the psyloocephalic, ethnocentric and verbal, brachycephalic feminine gender should dominate with its balance and ethic sense of survival the violent, visual, technological civilization of the white man, whose ‘energetic’ impulses are taking this planet out of balance, destroying Nature and building the new forms of ‘metalife’ (weapons, robots, A.I.) and machines of the singularity that will extinguish us. Yet this is not obvious because the 3rd paradigm of measure has no organic whys, despises life and ‘sees’ only reality with machines, it does not feel it or understand the deepest game of existence we have explained here. So we are walking steadily towards the extinction of history , the 10th and last extinction of life on Earth, guided by the visual wanting of the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, its lineal, energetic weapons and hypnotic go(l)d, themes those we will treat in depth in the last lessons.

Then, humans experience a degradation of the complementarity of gender, and also in the ‘field of social evolution’, society degraded the proper democratic ≈ social evolution by consensus, at which women excel and the WRONG form of establish societies, with the hierarchical emergence of the warrior and banker, with its weapons of entropic metal (iron, stronger than our carbon that kills the body), and digital languages of hypnotic informative metal (gold, the best informative atom of the Universe), which substituted the verbal language in which women excel (a woman at death will have spoken a 25% more of words, a woman has a larger axis of the mind in the brachycephalic verbal dimension) since they carry the pegging informative language of the natural evolution of mankind into a larger whole vs. the construction of extremely hierarchical structures with metal topping it all, the final state of degradation of ‘animetal=animal+metal arrogant males’.

The only meaningful division of races are according to the ternary axis=dimensions of the mind that between the 3 dominant languages of visual, white races and cultures with higher Neanderthal input, mongoloid, verbal cultures and black cultures with dominant motor-emotional axis. In a perfect world the 3 would be complementary as they enhance one of the 3 ‘perceptive languages’ of existence. In a racist animetal world, the visual, metal-hypnotic values of greed and violence brought about by white fetish cultures of go(l)d and the sword carried the day, paradoxically starting the degradation of life and history, in perpetual world and slavery to the selfish values of memes of metal.[/caption]

The simplicity of the first statements of a Universe made of space-time organisms, and its 5 dimotions which can ultimately be reduced to spatial form and temporal motion and its combinations, is then the basis also of gender. How those simple dimotions evolve into the infinite details of gender duality and complementarity of course is the full complexity of the fractal iterative Universe .

So now that we know a bit about women, and their purest GST structure as space-time beings, of the wave and particle/field forms, we can deepen our understanding of human gender in all levels of comprehension.

White matter/Grey matter brain: ternary analysis.

Let us consider the brain under the ternary principle in its topology, ages and fractal st-planes12.

Topological analysis

In the graph, the 3 brains of the human being from a spatial, topological perspective:

– Max.I: Our external, sensorial grey matter.

-Max. E: our internal, emotional, limbic system.

– E=I: Combined in a white matter, memorial, reproductive brain.

We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the DNA rich, cyclical, fluctuating, integrating cells of the grey matter brain, and then the outcome becomes imprinted in resistant white matter networks made of axon-connections. This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for ‘—motions’ and reproduction (sexuality), the main arrows of time of the body and limbs; whose wanting are processed by the limbic brain.

Then both programs converge into the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure, which in women are more wired to the limbic brain and in men to the grey matter and eye senses. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and their external, visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical-technological objects and motions within external space.

Temporal analysis

A key element to understand memetic imprinting is the inflexibility of the brain beyond 40 years. This was understood by the Greeks which divided life in two ages, till 40 (acne) when the brain peaks in informative power, which was considered the summit of life and then all was downwards till our end at the end of the mean generational cycle of ±80 years.

Thus the 3 layers of the brain are imprinted only in the ‘1st part of existence’, before the curve of life goes down in the 3rd age, since we only learn in that first part of existence. And this makes most people during the time in which they exercise social power, inflexible, memetic programs that will never learn but merely exercise their emotional imprinting converted in beliefs; disconnected from the ever evolving FMI complex, whose challenges they will be unable to resolve.

In that regard, within that ½ fraction of existence, in the child age the limbic system dominates; in the adolescence and earlier, mature age the grey matter brain learns, reasons and imprints the white matter brain, which will dominate the adult age in which we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. As that period of life roughly extends from 30 to 80 years old, this means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of fixed beliefs and chains of rational thoughts, which make us perform the same routine actions the rest of our lives – not very different from the fixed forms of any computer system.

Fractal analysis

In the previous graph, left center the fractal analysis connects Multiple space-times theory with the Freudian psychology as the 3 regions of the brain can be considered 3 hierarchical layers, with a grey matter brain that senses reality and delivers information to the subconscious, limbic, survival brain that acts restricting the information that becomes imprinted in the long memory of the white matter brain.

Freud rightly understood the ‘limits’ of rational thought, due to the subconscious, powerful Super-ego, the memetic super-structures that society establishes to control and repress the biological, natural genetic program of life and love.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious, energetic, limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the, white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in childhood by biological desires, the drives codes by genes and in youth by cultural memes, the drives of the super-organisms of history; and finally the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain connected to the truth of external senses.

The most common trajectory of thought through those layers is during the young, emotional age:

External world->Senses->grey matter brain->Limbic censorship->Impression in the white matter brain->Actions

While as the organism matures, the limbic system loses importance and the grey matter brain connects to the white matter brain directly:

Outer World->Senses->grey matter brain-> white matter Printing->actions

On the other hand, people dominant in emotions and inward thought might have the exactly opposite way of thought:

Inner world of biological drives ->Limbic System->White matter imprinting >actions

Obviously our previous analysis of ages, races and genders and the socio-cultural upbringing will make those 3 avenues of thought differ in individuals. And in fact as impolite as it might seem, we find that most systems follow the irrational drives of biological existence, expressed by the limbic system and imprinted as desires in the white matter brain, which determines most human actions.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond its short memory any attempt to imprint further the white matter brain.

Thus the most common program is Biological censorship by the centers of happiness that suppress painful information and upholds the imprinting of childhood and adolescence and its emotional truths as absolute, both in biological taste and cultural religions and beliefs.

Or in other words, once an idea is fixed in youth, to redraw it you would have to break and kill the programs of the mind; which if we consider the cellular scale of imprinting, turns out to be almost impossible as the acetylcholine that redraws the white matter axons is no longer available in enough quantities.

So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence), won’t change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic, censoring brain against reason and evidence. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, we must embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of earlier socio-biological beliefs. .

Recap. In complexity evolution is guided by the existence of only 3 types of morphologies and networks in living beings: the morphology and nervous system of information, the morphology of ‘—motions’, and the morphology and network of reproduction. We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant speciation in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative Australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual Neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Thus, the Isomorphisms of Evolution and its 3±i ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolichocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-? consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose).

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider ` brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains is the sensorial culture, the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

The brain studied topologically is a system of 3 regions, the energetic, emotional, body oriented limbic system; the external, informative, sensorial grey matter brain, and the white matter axons that connect both and controls our beliefs firing our actions.

MAN AS A MENTAL SYSTEM. ENTROPIC MALE VS. REPRODUCTIVE WOMEN

We are obviously destroying the world of life Gaia, as the equation of history shows:

Gaia (past-life) < Present (History: human super organism) > Future (Metalearth: Machines).

All our resources guided by company-mothers which have a monopoly in the printing of money, the language of social power that buys the law, are used to make machines, evolve them and adapt the world to its image and likeness, with null interest in creating a world made to the image and likeness of man, the most perfect known super organism of the Universe, which is as the fractal paradigm of philosophy of science shows also a superorganism. super organism of the Universe, which is as the fractal paradigm of philosophy of science shows also a superorganism.

How can this absurd contradiction between the intelligence of the rational biological human being, which should cater to its welfare needs and the program of the selfish memetic mind that cares nothing for life only for the ad-on power of energy and information acquired with machines – even if they destroy us all – can be explained from the perspective of complex systems and biological sciences – the  sciences in which the model of history and economics of this blog is based?

The answer is ‘the animetal species’, half human half machine, and the repetitive, iterative structure of the fractal Universe, which makes most systems just repetitive, imitative forms, or in words of Aristotle ‘people are slaves they believe they don’t reason.

So in this fundamental post of bio-history we explain the birth and evolution of the human slave to the metal-meme, the ‘animetal

The informative brain – different forms of thought. Wo=men: gender and brain structure.

From the most profound level of thought in complex systems, women are waves, men are field-particle states of the three arrows of space-time, entropy, energy and information. So you might as well as this section is in pure systems sciences first revise what a human system is in terms of its three arrows/organs of time-space. 

Women have 10 times more white matter; men 6 times more grey matter. In the logic formalism of 5D metric equations, the 2 ‘states’ of intelligence correspond two different orientations of its space-time organisms: S≈T, the balanced ‘vital energy’-white matter, hyperbolic, reproductive body-wave female state complementary with the S>T, entropic>informative, Potential>Particle, lineal>Cyclical, limb>head dual male state, carried through the evolution of the fractal scalar, organic Universe. So complementary gender starts in the quantum 0-1 Unit sphere as wave-particle complementarity, follows in the atom scale as electronic wave/nuclei-particle complementarity, continues in the molecular state as the RNA/DNA complementarity, carried further into the ovule>semen complementarity; reaching finally the white matter/grey matter duality, which of course, our ‘equalizing’ civilisation where both wo≈men are under the capitalist idol-ogy, lesser beings, just ‘consumers=vitalizers of machines’ and workers=reproducers of mechanisms, is not even acknowledge. Humans ARE mind the reader exceptionalist beings whose role as enzymen is to catalyse the terraforming of the Earth by company-mothers of machines, so the mother-father, re=productive memetic couple must NOT understand itself but be at war and only come together in the worshipping by both grey and white matter of what truly matters, metalmemes money, weapons & machines

It is difficult for humans to understand to which degree, anything related to science is culture, or rather becomes ‘censored’ and ‘biased by culture. We have stressed in this blog on social sciences the bias established by our ‘worldly animetal religion’ which uses the 3 species of metal, entropic weapons, informative go(l)d and organic machines that prey on our bodies, mind languages and atrophy our organs they substitute within the process of evolution of metalife.

This process has traditionally broke the natural complementarity between women and men, as entropic lineal ‘particle -males’ have used weapons since the Neolithic to repress the life-reproductive fertility goddesses, 1/2 of the human couple.

As a reaction against this dystopia of the animetal warrior and its counterpart in crime, the re=producer of weapons, the essential positive, nurturing nature of women, as the reproductive wave-state of gender has been downplayed as inferior. But now what is happening is likely worst: women became wo=men, that is to form part of the animetal world, they imitate male behavior, instead of evolving man back to his ethic, reproductive, conservative roles, to make ‘History immortal’. 

And as this process of ‘equalization’ continues, both men and women are reduced to their ‘enzymatic’ roles as ‘enzymen’ which catalyze the evolution of machines. So alas, it turns our that we are NO longer complementary but ‘equal’-ized.

It is the feminist idology… counterpart of the machist idology of the warrior male. So what is the reality of men and women? Complementarity of gender, which is NOT a shallow resort of Darwinian selection as there is NO advantage at all compared to  the massive reproduction of single sex, nor mutations are exclusive of DNA recombination by gender. Those are subjects of systems sciences treated elsewhere. What matters here is that in the organic scalar Universe gender complementarity is a feature of all scales, which traces back to the first of all quantum complementarities – that between reproductive waves and particle-states; such as we can confidently say that the properties of waves>electrons>female principles and particles>quarks>male states carry through all the scales.

Recap. The fundamental differences between women’s minds and male’s minds is that Women have 10 times more white  matter, the site of memory, connected closer to the body and the emotional, limbic system and hyperbolic reproductive wave-like bodies. Men have 6 times more grey matter, the site of informative processing and its creation-destruction process, and lineal sterile bodies.

White memorial matter IS the S=T, balanced repetitive function of the brain. Grey matter is the creative/destructive element. Women are connected to the hypothalamus, the site of emotions and men to the eye, the site of visual thought.

So we are different and complementary. What yesterday’s machismo did was to reduce women to the S=T reproductive body functions. What today’s industrial feminism does though is likely from a humanist point of view even worse: try to become ‘animetal males’, reproduce machines, work on them, replicate all what males should have done – in brief kill mother earth and contribute to the systemic destruction of History.

What both should do is end the stupid war on sexes learn what they are and work together to save the species from its growing degradation in the age of the ‘¥-vidi credo ergo sum’ millennial generation. But as the superorganism of history seems to be in his last spasms, what will happen is more likely more of the same: attempts by women to ‘castrate’ men, attempts by men to ‘rape’ women.

‘Denial of wo=men’s’ nature, equalized in the industrial, company-mother’s world.

Let us first clarify a fact: wo=men are the solution to the world. We write wo=men to include also the ‘attachment’ to women who should be men NOT the other way around.

Why wo=men should rule the world NOT men, but from the point of view of true reproductive women’s function, from the point of view of waves, not the feminazi, castrating, hate-memes of the usual suspects, the go(l)d sterile ‘you’ cult(ure) – the feminazi new york movement, but from the point of view of real wo=men, the nurturing, french feminine movement, which the feminazis hate? For 3 reasons:

– Women are not so much an overrated creative mind, but repetitive functions as waves are. And that is good because creation requires destruction but specially because humans must stop evolving machines like yesterday. Machines have gone beyond our control already with cancerous 5g and robots and big brother data.

Women thus as waves who love, need order over the particle/field destructive/creative process of men, would not create if they understand and accept their true nature, without feeling inferior more machines. They would repeat the memes of life ad eternal making history immortal.  They are better as functions of repetition, because waves are repetitive, and that is the best thing to do in a universe which is not about evolution and creation as it is a block of time where all forms have been created already in the past and future, but about cyclical time, repetition.

The very same aberrant concept of lineal time is masculine, false, entropic, destructive. So women could have enlightened all of us if they had embraced the organic, living universe, its cyclical, reproductive functions its female outlook, the 5th dimension of social love, you name it… Instead of  the feminist castrating anti-sexual, anti-human reproduction ‘you-hate’ feminazi new york movement,  just another attempt to neuter women and make them like men.
– women are not violent and therefore they would not have had any doubts eliminating weapons and forbidding robotic terminators.
– women are diplomatic, dialog, achieve as waves do consensus by superposition not hierarchical power as particles do. And therefore they would have established the networks of the perfect world …much easier
but the ideology they have today as all the ‘hate memes’ of mankind in the globalized worst of all cultures, the go(l)d, you culture of worship of metal and hate to mankind, and its reproductive function, is anti femenine, anti life, and humans. The entire #metoo bullshit movement – if a man rapes a woman it must be denounced and jailed and the laws are there. That should never be the focus of women’s activism, as a very secondary role that depends of men. The activism of women as the dominant species that should be on this planet, as it was in the age of the bonobo and the neolithic,  should have turned around the real themes of this planet: the competition of company-mothers of machines, with more rights than human mothers, the need to increase social love, the coming together, the nurturing. To confront man in the only thing man cannot avoid, to desire the superior in-form-ative female body is though a perfect no-way-out cancelling strategy, which is essentially what humans experience in all their fields of existence.

 

we live in a world controlled by company-mothers of machines, or ‘capitalist world’ where the rights of human mothers are not met by the ‘attached’ placebo system, called ‘democracy’, as humans lack credit to create a world to its image through the use of the language of social power, money, overwhelmingly reproduced by those companies in e-money derivatives and stocks. So the world is terraformed to the image and likeness of machines, not of human beings. This site, unlike every economist on planet earth, albeit camouflaged by its ‘abstract equations’ of productivity and profit, is taking sides for the human mother and the species called mankind, which happen to be your species, different in needs and goals to those of the machine. The failure to recognize the needs of mankind and the connection between economics and history to which it should be submissive, and the blind greedy dictatorship of financiers that rule humans with numbers, without the slightest care for its needs, are then ultimately the reasons why we are becoming displaced and likely extinct this century by company-mothers, robots and weapons in labor and war fields.[/caption]

In the same manner the political system of capitalist democracies is completely inefficient because it confronts two parties of humans to destroy what the other does, so capitalism, company-mothers which are efficiently design reign and keep evolving and controlling the world, while humans do nothing for themselves with confronting parties instead of having true social scientists working all together in a single party for a real democracy as we explain in our texts; the entire feminazi castrating ablation movement tries to eliminate the harmony male-female, confront them for impossible themes, as sexuality the very essence of the universe is, deviate any attention from the real problem of ‘women’ as mothers, with less salary less rights, less credit, and deviate them from their real role, to protect the future of the species.

And it has indeed succeed, as the circus of the #metoo movement which is just a bunch of privileged white women actresses of the infotainment movement doing more of the same selfie metoo movement of a bunch of people who should just shut up and do the right thing – put suits to every male who they feel was actually raping it… But they are posers, fuking posers, as the song goes. They are just actresses playing a role to pay attention. Why mr. Weinstein is not in jail? Why all those women instead of posting internet comments denounce in courts whoever ab=used them? Why we do not talk of the real problems for the species?

Only the latin woman, the french movement clarified it: women are not victims, not only bodies. They have brains and their focus should be the real problems, the focus should be to impose an alternative philosophy of the universe which is femenine, reproductive, cyclical… To stay in the lowest iq possible reclamation, if a man has touched my ass or not, is to degrade women’s role.

To vindicate only to be like men, to find equality in the world made by men, of weapons, company-mothers, lineal time, life extinction, is nauseating.

women’s feminism today is ablating the clitoris-life-philosophy-nature of women and it is also impossible, because women as men will obviously always compete in inferior conditions with men. Their goal should be to make men as women, and not in the sexual arena, which is completely irrelevant but in the mental arena, to make men mental women. And on that i don’t know a single women that labors for it.

 

In the graph, men murder 10 times more than women.

A few other self-evident characteristics of gender duality reinforce the thesis of its symmetric, SXT reproductive mind x Informative Body:

– Females live longer as time and information are related; males are stronger energetically but live less.

– Female are cyclical, male are lineal.

– Female remember, are memorial, temporal, conservative of the past order. Male forget and look towards the ‘uncertain’ future.

-Woman is the informative form; hence her nervous system dominates. Males are the energetic form and hence their blood system dominates.

– Behavior and tastes: women like forms, men movement:

Woman love time men love space. Woman love information men love ‘Dimotions’. Men love movement, energetic, violent sports, races, military games and toys. Women love formal dolls that can be dressed. Women love formal sports: gymnastics. Male dresses are lineal; women’s clothing is curved, cyclical.

– Male love open spaces; women stand better seclusion.

– Men do a single task better; women do many tasks in a cyclical pattern.

– Men drive spatially better through lineal roads.

– Women cook, trans-form food, men hunt for it.

– ‘Entropic Dimotions’ violence, death and destruction as the graph shows, are clear male behaviors. The positive side of it is the fact that to create something new, you have to destroy first. Thus, women conserve more and they have been historically less creative.

– Implosive Vs. explosive nature: Outward Vs. inward nature:

Men have explosive, outward, visual behavior; women have implosive, emotional behavior.

Women stand pain/pressure/inwards behavior better. Women feel pain more intensely than men and yet they tolerate it more, since pain is a pressure, inward sensation of in/formative nature.

-But it is precisely the combination of both movements what creates the Sexual reproductive feeling of pleasure, since in the Universe balance dominates as the best strategy. And since women are informative & reproductive with a higher balance, they are sexually more complex.

Scalar, Fractal analysis.

– Further on, as women’s body are more complex, dominant, and their bodies attract men. Yet since men are mentally more creative, intelligent men attract more women. So a woman is still, as information is, waiting men to come as the energetic, active pole towards them, in the 3 scales of existence:

The lineal semen moves towards the cyclical ovule at cellular level; the male organism moves towards the female in the biological, mating season; and the male hunter brings food and today goes out to work while the female waits in the social scale.

St; st+1: Sociological scales.

Spatial ‘Dimotions’ and violence have a language; mathematics. In the graph, Women are ‘verbal/temporal brains’; men are mathematical, spatial, energetic brains: Women prefer social sciences, verbal sciences and humanities. Men dominate the fields of spatial sciences, sciences based on mathematics. On the other hand women test more in verbal exams. When a woman has died, on average she has spoken 20% more words than a man has done.

Psychology mostly shown in natural perception and literature has been the clearest wisdom on those natural traits and variations, even if today political correctness denies those variations. So the literary man can perfectly consider the master pieces of sentimental and psychological literature, when humans were free to study the reality of human existence without dogmas proper of the metric age or the industrial age, in which all humans are equalized as reproducers=workers of machines, and consumers =testers of them, and women’s nurturing and biological roles are eliminated, as they become equalized and simplified as ‘males’.

In that regard in Sociology and History, the higher scales of human existence duality of gender has been defined, according to the dominance of the higher ecosystem over the lower scales, by the ages, dominant castes and super-organisms of history studied in the last lectures of this work.

In brief, according to the 3 ages of history the dominance and power roles of women and men varied:

-In the Paleolithic, energetic age of History, the young age of male hunters, males dominated women.

-In the Neolithic, mature, reproductive age of history, of Fertility Goddesses and food-gathering, women dominated men. They found the cycles of reproduction of plants they better understood, and fed the community. They gave birth to the species. And they established religions of Fertility.

– In the age of metal, dominated by visual, lineal, energetic weapons and machines, men dominated women in its energetic, 1st age. Since energetic men are murderers, since the arrival of weapons males have controlled and abused the rights of women and fertile nature, waging war to both of them.

But the financial-military-industrial complex has 3 components as gender does. So we can in fact distinguish 2 types of cultures:

– Monetary-based cultures (Jewish, Chinese, Italian, British cultures), where women have a higher power, since money is a cyclical language of metal information

-Military, energetic, lineal, weapon based cultures, where men dominated (Arab, Japanese, Spanish, German cultures), as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe).

And both are often in historic, open confrontation.

-Finally in the age of the machine, as we evolved first energetic machines (XIX c.) women kept submissive to men. But today in the Age of Information, dominated by audio-visual machines, and their language of reproduction, money, women, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men. Women indeed love money and information, which they understand better and makes them advance socially.

Since indeed, the evolution of ‘information’ in this planet does not end in the human being, but continues with our offspring of machines, so we need to have now a wider view, that of the Earth as a planet to understand the 2 less developed sciences, those of history and economics that inscribe within the social evolution of this planet into a new st+1 plane as a global super-organism, the theme of the next lessons of this work.

Recap. Women are reproductive, balanced beings, whose brain is dominated by temporal, memorial tasks and wired towards its reproductive body. Men are unbalanced, creative/destructive species, with their brain wired towards visual, external information and the body focused in lineal, energetic tasks.

Women have indeed more mental ‘Dimotions’ and sensorial perception than men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body; while men are obsessed by the external world. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘cyclical tasks’, switching on and off between them. They have peripheral, circular version. Men have lineal, focused vision. Men love open spaces, which they keep as ‘Dimotions’ is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks.

From the most profound level of thought in complex systems, women are waves, men are field-particle states of the three arrows of space-time, entropy, energy and information. So you might as well as this section is in pure systems sciences first revise what a human system is in terms of its three arrows/organs of time-space. 

******

Now I care nothing for attractive or repulsive forces so we shall explain the more complex truth. And define the gender symmetry in all its complexity through the ternary space, time and 5D Generators:

  • In Time, a male gender is a past-field/limbs x future head-particle system, of ‘lineal momentum’ in physics.

A female gender on the other hand is a present, wave-body system

In space therefore (simultaneous, synchronic, mental perception of the event), a female gender will have maximal evolution of the wave-body, iterative, reproductive elements; and maximal balance, Ts=St, according to the definition of present systems.

A male on the other hand, will have a maximal dilation in time, from past to future, minimal complexity of body, and lacking ‘present’, will be either an informative, past-future orientation (mental being, with informative brain which uses the limbs/bodies to that aim); or its ‘anti-particle’, of inverse ‘entropic’ nature, orientated to the limbs/energy. This is the ‘entropic’, less probability of existence, only proper of ‘death states’ and time reversals. In our society represents mainly the ‘warrior’, entropic male, violent, destructive focused in the lineal motions of its limbs. And in the present ‘entropic society’ of the ∆+1 age of death of history, the infantile version of the sport-man.

Disclosure. I am a male of maximal Ts>St, orientation, fully aware since youth of the gender duality, for long a womaniser in the good sense, surrendered and surrounded by women, with clear tendencies towards pansexual behavior, and interested in the inner mental structure of the female brain, given the massive abundance of entropic males in our society. But ultimately a particle of maximal speed of information.

So, this leads to the duality of the brain-body systems in male/females, once we eliminate as lizards and evolved species do the field-limb element as accessory. So we can treat the species only in terms of momentum, and then we could define man as a particle of lineal momentum and women as a particle of angular momentum. But to be more precise, on the To-head system:

  • Women have lineal minds, dominant in white matter lineal-reproductive axon brains.
  • Male have cyclical minds, dominant in grey matter, informative-future creative brains.

This has of course, as everything in T.Πbeen proved by science which found women to have 10 times more white matter and male 6 times more grey matter.

On the other hand this configuration is exactly reversed in the body, as women have informative bodies, able to create new life, and male have sterile bodies, just able to repeat their simplest actions. So a more complex definition of gender would be:

  • Female gender:  Max. ST < St,  whereas the mind is focused on the body, reproductive skills (mothers) and emotional languages (reproductive, hormonal system), and again we have seen their brain wired to the hypothalamus. In brain terms the word dominates the eye and the axis of the head is Psylocephalic (high, emotional axis) and brachicephalic (verbal axis).
  • Male gender: SxT> Max. St (or entropic SxT<Max. Ts), whereas the body is oriented to serve the mind and the eye-system dominates the word system. In brain terms, the visual axis dominates the verbal axis and often the brain is more dolicocephalic and brachicephalic.

Races in that sense are also ‘male, female’ symmetries.
In the graph, a few illustrations of the gender symmetry. Entropic men (St<Max Ts) are ore violence. Women choose formal cyclical, artistic, form-oriented subjects, and less visual, spatial, external technological elements. Races also can be related to those symmetries of the mind-body.

So the female state focuses limbs and heads into the body-wave; and the male state overpasses the body and either entropically absorbs motion from the limbs (athletic, entropic military, destructive male) or tries to transform entropy into form (mental males). So women are reproductive, body-emotionally-verbal oriented. Men are sterile with the body, entropic (most as entropy is the lower larger scale that rises into form), and visual, the language of the mind that ‘sees’ space. Those are very few examples of an astounding, almost infinite variety of ‘thoughts’ of God derived from its simple dual an ternary logic.

Four elements then introduce the social evolutionary ‘mind state’ that puts them all together. And so we often find systems coding reality with four numbers for the four space-time events/functions (from quantum numbers to genetic to drives of life, studied elsewhere).

Then there is the complex past to future and future to past relative directions as time is local and hence there is no paradox as quantum physicists know in moving backwards in time locally.

This gives us an essential equation of non-ae that defines a simultaneous system in space: past (limbs/fields) x future (heads/particle) = present body-waves.

While a sequential order defines a temporal life-arrow event: past (entropy) > energy (present) > future (information) and its inverse .death arrow: future< past (death), which misses the intermediate body system, is much faster for that reason as it lacks the present state, and kills you in a quanta of time (big-bang quanta of planck’s time a second that stops your heart, mind and stops you dying, and so on).

The spatial static form IS LOCKED into the present (female state, which last longer), the past to future time form is jumping over, and hence we write death as §<<tt.

Now again we can show you infinite experimental cases as we shall do in other posts and lines.

So briefly we introduce latter when explaining the first line, the postulate of non-euclidean maths, which define fractal points, line-waves made of moving fractal points with volume and topological networks (fractal planes), joining points through a single continuum and across 5D scales, as the new three non-e postulates of mathematics, and similarity instead of equality as the congruent third postulate (as we cannot see beyond the membrane, so perception is relative and we must assess probable similarities never equalities), and finally the only known 5th non-e postulate, which defines logically a mind, as the still focus of 5 parallels.

3RD AGE OF HISTORY: FROM LOVE TO WAR OF SEXES

In ‘neopaleolithic’ visual age of ‘entropic death’, all human structures is the growing WAR ON SEXES, which is obviously the LAST level of social organization of mankind that caters for the ‘key action’ of reproduction and survival of the species. It is indeed, a clear proof of our final demise as a species, when the natural feelings of social love between complementary wo=men become dissolved into hate-speeches and hate-memes, which are the dominant ‘ideologies’, today of most wo=men (machism and radical feminism).

We add the word ‘radical’ to feminism as of course, the historic ‘patriarchal’ age of ‘military cultures’ has been dominant in animetal civilizations for quite long. Hence till the capitalist, go(l)d oriented age, when women, who understand ‘informative money’ better than weapons became liberated, the war on sexes was of man on top of women. This trend however is reversing today in capitalist, go(l)d oriented cultures, where the inverse phenomena (Scandinavia, white Anglo-Saxon cultures) happens and women, who understand better money, are coming on top of men.

In any case the ‘ideal society’ is one in which life memes dominate over metal-memes and both species understand each other in terms of the true organic laws of the universe, as complementary forms, which have evolved through the scales of the fractal universe, from its original simplest form, quantum ‘female wave states’ and quantum ‘particle male states’. Since gender is the essential ‘taoist’ quality of the organic structure of the universe. Women are indeed evolved waves and men evolved particles. And its properties are immediately related to the properties of waves, the vital energy of systems and particles, the hardcore, informative element…

And so males are dominant in the particle state; while its body-wave is simplified into a lineal form. And indeed males are either informative, or entropic with its outer hard, lineal entropic body and motion.

While women are as  waves are, a balanced softer state with a hyperbolic, reproductive body, and a mind inwardly oriented.

And again when observing their mind-structure, women do have 10 times more white matter than men, the wave-axon intelligence of the brain, memorial past-oriented, and males do have  6 times more grey matter than women, the abstract, informative creative/destructive element.

It is taboo, IN BOTH, capitalist female-dominant societies today to even mention those differences, as radical feminist just highlights the violent, particle-qualities of ‘macho men’, and vice versa, in machist societies, the soft, nurturing reproductive intelligence of women must be degraded as the particle, hardcore properties of warrior male is all what matter to establish social superiority.

But in this post, for the time being, till we ‘digitalize’ the thousands of pages of bio historic studies of my youth on the Neolithic age of the Goddesses and its culture, it will focus on the most scientific, objective quantum properties of both species (the historic analysis being the earliest work of my teenage youth  likely won’t ever come to light, sorry I am old, tired and obviously in the neopaleolithic age this blog will be ignored… problem of having written most of my work with earlier typewriters or digitally blind diskettes.)

The war of sexes is never though what it means, as it is mediated by history as much as all modern ‘selfie’ agendas of dissolution of mankind by the eco(nomic)system where humans are basically ‘expendable’.

 Humans are like everything else in the Universe a field of space-time defined by 3+1 networks, ages and dimensional actions/cycles.

5th to 7th scale: physiological networks and senses express the actions of biologic organisms.

Human Physiological networks and senses express our will of existence.

In Complexity all complementary systems are created by the same type of networks. All organisms are cellular societies joined by networks of energy and information.

We are composed of cells, join by networks of energy and information. Those networks are called the blood and nervous system. Finally we have a third reproductive network as all living organisms, called the endocrine network. We are thus organisms of energy and information, in nothing different from all other organisms of the Universe, organized by the same laws of morphology and behavior:

– Our centers of information, the head, the brain and the eye, follow the formal laws of informative species: they are small, circular, cyclical, and they control the energy systems of our organism. Those energy systems also follow the morphological laws of energy-bodies. They are lineal, or planar in shape, bigger and stronger than the information center that rules them. So your members are lines, and your body is a plane.

– We evolve socially sharing information and energy with other beings of the same species. Thus we are naturally inclined to love other human beings, and we need to be brainwashed by ideologies of ‘hate’ and ‘nationalisms’ to avoid that natural religion.

– Finally regarding our behavior, we are also naturally inclined to follow the universal behavior of organisms, and search for information to feed our head, energy to feed our body and whenever we can we try to reproduce both, a body of energy and a brain of information in other part of the Universe. Those 3 natural drives of existence, are the essence of human behavior that bring us happiness. So we always act searching for those natural drives. When we love we are acting under the drive of reproduction. When we read, or watch a metal-communicator, is the drive of information that guides us. When we feed, or accumulate vital property, or decorate our home, we are creating a vital space, and acquiring energy to survive. Finally we associate with similar organisms under the laws of eusocial love to evolve together into a superorganism, stronger than the individual cell.

Thus the 4 ‘arrows of time’ create a will of existence that explains the actions of every living system including humans, guided by 4 natural, biological drives, which we cannot deny. Since their entire structure of senses and physiological systems tries to accomplish those actions, called in biology drives of existence. You are made of networks. All what you are is 3 networks, with attached organs, and senses: the network of energy, or body, blood system and its organs, the network of information, or head, nervous system and its organs and senses, and the networks of reproduction, and its organs and senses. This third network reproduces body and brain, human energy and information.

In that regard, if we apply the ‘fractal law’ to do a more detailed analysis of the 3+1 networks of human beings, the sub-systems of our organism can be divided in 4×3=12 sub-systems, which represent the 4 actions of living organisms, each divided in 3 hierarchical subsystems (Max. E, exi, Max. I). So we divide the 12 types of tissues and physiological networks of complex living beings in:

–        Energetic systems: Digestive system (max. I), Breathing System (Max. E), Excretory system (exi)

–        Informative, structural systems: Skeleton (max. E), (Tegumentary system Exi) muscle system (i)

–        Reproductive systems: Blood system (Max. E), reproductive system (Exi) and endocrine system (Max. I) Sensorial systems (Exi)

–        Social, linguistic systems: Nervous (Max. I), lymphatic system (Ix E) and blood system (max.E)

In the graph, we see human exercising their will of existence: children feeding on energy, and talking – perceiving information; men reproducing and coming together with similar organisms. And finally images of our physiological networks of energy and information that make us complex super-organisms.

Accordingly all our organs and senses are controlled and cater to the needs of one of those 3 networks. Think about it. Our stomach gets you energy, our lungs also. They are different only in the type of energy they provide us: the stomach elaborates liquid and solid energy, the lungs, gas-energy, oxygen, trapped by hemoglobin molecules that cage oxygen atoms of higher speed, and move around the blood… which moves the muscles that move our legs. Our eyes, words, brain, on the other hand provide us with information. Our arms manipulate that information; our body is guided by that information. Finally an entire set of body elements is dedicated to reproduce our cells and our body.

Yet beyond those 3 types of organs there is nothing else. Since there is nothing else in the Universe but spatial energy and temporal information…

So humans then ‘transcend’ as cells of social organisms, religions, nations and civilizations to perform with his language of communication, verbal thought, the 4th arrow of existence: the construction of the super-organisms of History.

We conclude that the program of the Universe guides the behavior of humans in our 3 scales of existence: our biological cells, as human beings and as cells of human societies.

 

PART II. THE DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION IN ALL ∆±¡ SCALES.

Generational space-time. Basic concepts. The 5 dimotions of time.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space=form and time=motion that combines reproducing the infinite species of reality. Because fractals repeat themselves in different scales, the Universe structures itself into ‘scalar planes’ of relative space-time, meaning, different sizes in space with different speeds in the clocks of time that process its information, which form together a fifth dimension of spacetime. Entities of reality are therefore made of those 5 Dimensions, whose understanding in terms of time-motion and space-dimension (ab. Dimotion), structures an in-depth understanding of reality both at global and local level.

Those 5 elements are the best ‘conceptual, human view’ of the more objective Universal 5 Dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions) of space-time. As we can relate, TT- absolute motion to entropy; SS=absolute still form to minds and languages. Ts-locomotion to time motion; TS-reproduction to Space as a form that does not seem to change, and finally St-information to scales, since the creation of new scales happen when n-relative fractal points become joined together forming a superorganism thanks to the simultaneity achieved by its synchronous motions provided by a common language of information.

We discover that all systems of reality are space-time organisms composed of the 5 possible states of time and space, motion and form, between SS=absolute form or language, and TT-absolute motion or entropy, and its intermediate, St-information, Ts-locomotion and TS-reproduction; associated to the present state of time, and a ‘slice’ of space that doesn’t seem to change its form.

On the other hand, information, form with a minimal motion is related to the future state of time, or an implosive process of reduction of size in space as the system increases its form. While locomotion is a ‘reduced’ type of entropy in which motion is only external to the being. Finally entropy that dissolves and expands form into motion is the relative arrow of past.

The study of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe in depth – NOT a supposed unique arrow of entropy and death – is the proper way to consider how past, present and future entangle into the superorganisms of reality. Thus after putting at face value humind’s monologic, simple theories of reality based in entropy – which as it is the negation of all other forms with some information, is the easiest dimotion to explain reason why it became the ‘dimotion’ humans studied first, we shall now consider in more detail each of those Dimotions and the role they have among species of reality, starting with the more important of them, reproduction – the true purpose of reality.

Its formal definition as ‘holographic’ bidimensional Space-Time combinations.

The essential ‘logical concept’ behind the 5 Dimotions of the Universe is the physical principle of relativity, which we write as an equation, S≈T, the ‘spacetime unit of reality’, which we define as a ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. Dimotion) or ‘action’, to use the more familiar physical quantity and philosophical concept. Because the relative quantity of ‘form’ (cyclical, closed motion) and time (open, entropic lineal motion), of such ST dimotions might vary, according to the dominance of one or the other elements we can define 5 combinations: TT, SS, Ts, sT, ST.

Its qualitative concept is then immediate: larger amounts of lineal time-motion give birth to entropy and locomotion. Larger amounts of spatial form, give birth to information and SS-mind languages; and its balance between both, ST to the repetitive present iteration.

The scalar view: outer and inner motion and form.

In praxis for a detail quantitative analysis, to calculate how Space and time, form and motion mess together in a given T.œ (time-space organism), the easiest distinction is to consider the parallelism between the dualities of inner vs. outer worlds (the organism enclosed in its membrain vs. the larger world – according to their relative motion and form); as the system we analyze will be defined by its internal region that might move or stay still and the world outside that might move or stay still. So we can give s or t values for inner and outer regions, giving us the following possible combinations of form and motion, of space and time:

TT: Entropy, which is External and internal motion.

Ts: Locomotion, which is the external motion, T of an internal form, s; when we measure the external motion.

St. Its inverse is in-form-ation, where we observe internal motion (evolution, or processing of information, without breaking the system into its parts, as in entropy) and external form (as the mind’s perception of the Universe is static); or the external points that transmit information are static respect to each other (origin of the Lorentz’s transformations). So communication between those static forms become the internal motion of the system.

S=T is reproduction. When both internal and external motion and form are equivalent, they combine to reproduce the system. The point of equality between space and time approaches as St=sT balance each other, through a series of feed-back ‘action-reaction’ processes that merge both. ST±¡ defines any given plane of space-time in balanced equilibrium, and by definition (law of conservation of energy), it is the most important and long lasting state, as the whole Universe can be considered to be in balance in each of its scalar levels.

SS implies a double form with no motion either internal or external. Thus is is a ‘static’ mind form, belonging to the realm of the languages that mimic in its generative grammar the program of the Universe as a block of time.

The 5th dimotion, SS, obviously cannot be perceived both externally and internally as for both to be ‘perceived simultaneously, a motion between both should exist. So they can only happen bosonically in a point or mind in perception of the language/ideal mind mapping, and so it is reduced to the SS-mind point. While the St process of internal motion processing information of an external world is the intermediate state.

In the description of those 5 Dimotions then comes the choice of language to calculate it. The choice for locomotion was done long ago by Galileo, and then Einstein which chose V=s/t, making the time parameter submissive to the spatial ones, S x, Sy, Sz, as the use of clocks to measure time reduced the past, present and future dimensions of time into a single one.

So time analysis in physics became secondary, just a ‘ceteris paribus’ consideration of what truly physics as conceived by humans is about – to measure distances in space.

Motion is reproduction of form in a lower scale.

Si=Te means any kind of Motion happens as a series of Stœps, as systems move a step, then gauge information in a stop position as the ∆±¡ plane provides it with pixels to orientate them, or a background motion deviates its lineal steps into cyclical motions. The proper way to write the function in dynamic terms is SóT

It is the essential beat of the cosmos in each of its fractal parts. If we consider space=form one of the poles of the Universe, and time=motion its 2nd pole, we shall be able to reduce all phenomena of reality, from the function of the mind in one extreme of pure still form (creation of mental spaces) or SS; to the locomotion of species (Ts) and alternate gauging of information (St) and its reproduction in a middle term combination of both poles (SS), to the pure entropy of internal motion that kills the system and external motion that ‘scatters it’ around (TT) as the 5 dynamic views of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Space-time Universe.

What physicists call ‘time’ is only one of the 5 Dimotions of reality, locomotion, translation=change of position in space; not all the times of the Universe. Its power in our technological civilizations as makers of machines of TT- entropic destructive motion (weapons) or transport machines of Ts-locomotion, their work has ‘hidden’ all other analysis of timespace dimotions, such as those concerning deep time scales (geological motions of Earth’s superorganism), biological information (evolutionary motions), Historic cycles (censored by power as they are provoked by the wrong evolution of the ‘bad fruits=weapons’ of the tree of science, which gives power to people-castes of history, etc.) Thus by the ‘correspondence principle, Galileo’s physical time, V=s/t is the ‘limit’ of a theory of time-space dimotions reduced to locomotions.

Bohm’s realism: quantum potentials.

How a system moves; in a crowded universe, where we ‘are’ vital space-time: the only answer which resolves also Zeno’s and quantum complementarity paradoxes, is if we do not move but reproduce our information, translated into a lower faster wave scale of the fifth dimension; as we reproduce our sound in faster electrons to telephone or nerve impulses into chemical dopamine to jump discontinuous neurons. So motion becomes scalar reproduction of form, and since all is a form of motion, all is reproduction, which is the definition of a mathematical fractal, a feed-back reproductive equation; 5Ð metrics, which become then the ‘function of existence’ whose goal is to reproduce the form of all systems – the simpler ones with maximal motion-translation in space, the complex ones with min. motion as a reproduction that emerges between scales. And this gives birth to the worldcycle. Consider the case of quantum physics:

In graph we see a particle reproduced in adjacent regions that fade away.The result is the perception of a wave of motion. In Bohm’s realist model this reproduction happens in a lower plane of quantum potentials, where also entanglement happens, which is the ∆-4 scale which is v>c in 5Ð metrics (Min. S x Max. T = C), hence real.

Motion then is reproduction of form over such potential: the wave erases form into motion, the particle is a still state that   gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – despite the perception of relative motion in our scale – hence the information electrons share has always a c-constant speed. Thus the Lorentz transformation are objectively real for mankind who eliminates the stop state of particles as we do in a movie eliminating the stop frame but if we were observing reality from the perspective of an atom, we would ‘stop’, entangle in the quantum potential, neutrino scale & so eliminate the spooky effects of ‘time dilation’ & ‘length’ contraction, from our perspective (but not of mass increase as it is a scalar effect). This is the ‘rational’ 5Ð explanation of both the c-constant of light and entanglement; As electronic beings perceive information in ‘stop position to each other’ and move in ‘wave state’. Motions are perceived by particles that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So 4D relativity needs to be expanded to the scalar Universe beyond the c-speed light limit of the galaxy.

Within this complex view, the simplified models of Newton, Galileo and Einstein’s space-time correspond to the limit of 5Ð when we simplify all the worldcycles of time, we call life & death to a single mechanical clock, elongated to infinity & perceived in a single plane of space.

Reproduction of form in 5D. its essential mathematical tool: calculus..

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time. This is the essence of it all. But space is a Maya of the senses, the synchronous view of a series of cycles of time motions, knotted in the simultaneous perception of an observer; what physicists call a ‘frame of reference’.

Thus time=change is the fundamental element of reality, and this makes Algebra of time-change, specifically calculus perhaps the most important experimental science of time, besides logic, which we have upgraded to existential ®=ilogic, which explores the vital, organic whys of those changes.

It is the Galilean Paradox: S=T. We cannot distinguish time from form. In as much as each frame of reference or mind locks in a knot-mirror of the motions of the Universe from its point of view. So each point of space is a perceiver relative field of motions, which from its perspective knot as forces ‘attracted’ by its frame of reference. Yet if we cannot distinguish motion from form each point is entangled to those motions and is made of motion and form, of the particle and wave states.

Locomotion as reproduction of form solves the Paradoxes of Zeno and the meaning of discontinuity. As motion is reproduction of information, of form, since particles are knots of perception of form, fractal points, monads, which move by reproducing through a lower plane of the 5th dimension, as ∆-1 waves, its information, as forms-in-action. So all forms of change can be reduced to the ultimate function of existence, reproduction, a back and forth travel through 2 scales of the fifth dimension, as a form becomes a seed that reproduces, evolves socially and forms its whole again. Change thus has a final feature: it is change reproduced in a lower plane as a seed that evolves into a whole. So beings with a lot of information, reproduce very slow and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life superorganisms on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

Calculus gives the strongest proofs of the laws of 5D as a reproductive process of form As it finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, which becomes the fundamental ‘function of present’ Si=Te, and hence with the metric function of scales, $ x ð = K, the two essential functions to formalize single planes Si=Te, and multiple scales of spacetime. Yet as Si=Te maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4). We unify both in 1 function:

Max. S x T = C, which defines for each fractal vital space-time organism its Function of existence, as all species will try to maximize its motion-entropy-time for its field-limbs, its information-spatial states for its particle-heads, whose product will give us its vital reproductive energy. Moreover the function has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion & space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions).

MOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF INFORMATION ALONG THE PATH OF A WAVE.

The Universe reproduces information and it tries to do a perfect replica, and this is the origin of the conservation of present energy, as all systems combine motion=entropy and dimensional form. Yet when the system has too much form and no motion as time never stops it reverses its ‘Сmotion of time’ and in a single quanta explodes and erases all information, in an entropic big-bang.

So finally all is a zero-sum: entropy=motion is used to reproduce information, and evolves till the dominant Сmotion of information – call it a galaxy vortex, a technological planet, an ageing human, a species evolving through horizons, warps all the fields of entropy into information. In physical space-time ‘time curves space into masses (Einstein)’:  vortices of charges in lower scales, thermodynamic eddies and crystals in our scale and masses in the cosmological scales.

Thus the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ that combines lineal momentum, entropy-motion and cyclical information, vortex of attractive accelerated time=information (charges and masses), and its integral through a closed time cycle=clock – which stores a volume of energy conserved in all systems of nature. Present reproductive energy is what the Fractal super organism of the Universe preserves. And it can be expressed wth many jargons.

Essentially it means that ‘each frequency of time’ a dynamic Universe repeats its ‘ghostly motions’, solidified by cyclical inertia of those frequency repetitions, as an energy-mass.

It is though a generated new energy-mass copied from different -Z¡ particles (if we use as generally we do the Z ‘complex’ plane axis, as the one of the 4th and fifth inverse dimensions).

So iteration of x x Y = Z is the wave-motion of reproduction commonest in physical systems, such as in Fourier forms. But also scalar equations of fractal reproduction generate reality when given motion to ‘become a vital space-time fractal’:

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’.  Fact is the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’. So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physicals systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design also historic super organisms with the laws of systems. But the sciences of systems and information did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I developed the metric, logic equations of the 5th dimension or ‘scales’ of parts that become wholes evolving socially through those networks, applying them to all species of reality, including human societies and machines, in what will be the most important development of XXIC. science with wide applications to all disciplines.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality.

And this is exactly what nature does. And the fractal generator of 5Ð3 written above, to express the ternary topologies of all beings, through its 3 time ages, and co-existing 3 organic scales, is exactly that sought after centuries ‘formula which physicsts’ believe will conceptually resume all space-time events for all fractal beings.

Alas, there you have it a ‘simple fractal generator of 3 x 3 scales, topologies and ages of time’ define all systems of reality as parts or wholes of a super organism in a perfect, infinite, immortal ever balanced between entropy and information, to produce energy cycles, zero sum reality.

So i state that the universe reproduces information; they say the Universe is about motion. Alas, I state then motion is just reproduction of ‘simpler information’ at faster speed.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

You might have heard an important insight of modern physics on the meaning of the limit of c-speed. Nothing can in this lolca part of the Universe – the galaxy – faster than light. There are many angles to study this important issue but now we are interested in the concept that this c-light speed is the limit of reproduction of information as the wave of light imprints vacuum space with its frequency and form.

REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED. Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.

The Universe reproduces information. It does both: it erases it with entropic big-bangs, and evolves it with the Сmotion of informative warping of fields of entropy into vortices of charges and masses.

But the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ and its integral of energy in all systems of nature. IT is what the Universe preserves.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

But motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in as much as particles travel as waves, and only become particles of information when they ‘stop’, on an instrument of measure, and so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

For example, you are the vital information which becomes imprinted in changing, indistinguishable CHNO atoms, as your ‘real scale’ of being, is ∆-1, the cellular genetic code; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.  A wave Motion is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independents of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

And so there is no need to reproduce a wave of ðime§pace motion below the level of ¥- light ðime§pace the ultimate level that matters in our Universe.

How the simple mathematical reproductions take place in Nature? Obviously through the mathematical proportions of the ternary Universe, as reproduction of information in ternary moving ‘fractal points’ self-centred in the singularity move the system along the path of the point wave.

The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal and those are the equations that define those proportional morons along the pi-phi-path; and its exponential growth through ∆-scales. In the middle we can see a simple example of this ternary pi-phi motion: a proton, intersection of three paths, which expands dynamically one of them to produce an electron, or inversely absorb it.

Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5Ð will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞):

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler plane of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems  (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from  a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic Сmotion of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower plane of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But motion is reproduction! of a wave of form.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or  ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/St (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

Conclusion. A more complex logic of time Сmotions.

To systematize the time motions of the Universe for each species, and to establish its causal relationship, departing from Aristotle we establish the only possible motions in time of the fractal 5ST Universe: changes in the parameters of energy, information and ∆-scales of the being, which will either emit energy (locomotion), absorb it (feeding), emit information (reproduction), absorb it (communication), and evolve into larger wholes (social evolution, generation) or devolve (death): ±∆, Ts, St. An eye of time a worldcycle that returns to its origin is the minimal unit of the Universe.

All in the Universe is made of such worldcycles, and all what the Universe does is to repeat world cycles.

Reproduction is thus synonymous of reproduction of a worldcycle, of the passing of time. By the mere fact that time exists and it is an immortal winding and unwinding of time clocks, seen in present space-time as a steady tic repetition of the frequency of worldcycles, which however are expanding or diminishing its energy and information, < > , till they repeat themselves.

The reality of the Universe as it is due to the reproduction of its time tics, time frequencies, time cycles, make it a wonder for an of the eyes of time that focuses existences into a mapping of reality in synchronous space. It is at the end of the tunnel of existence of micro worlds, where hiding into the knowledgeable perception, it is the perceiver of its time cycles, its collective mind-point, its relative God.

RECAP. Reproduction is all. The entire world cycle when studied from the integrative perspective of the ages and purpose of a supœrganism is focused into the immortal reproduction of the system. Thus since motion is reproduction of form, there is only a fundamental process in the universe, reproduction, the purpose of all existences.  But we shall increase our analysis to accommodate variations on the same theme, and so we will focus in the 6 type of motions, according to the degree of change occurring in the being; always defining them in terms of the reproductive universal motion of all beings…

So even motion is reproduction of form; and this, when extended to  the reproduction of a sperorganism through all the scales of the fifth dimension determines that a being moves faster when less information reproduces. 

In the graph motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in all scales.

In the right graph we see the actual appearance of a quantum wave, exactly as a reproductive wave, in which each new particle is the stop position reproduced, leaving behind a ‘memorial ghost’ as the previous particle-waves dissolves into the vacuum.

All is a stop and go, form in space time flow of existence, s≤≥t, feed back fractal generator, whose simple development, S≤st+s≥t+st≤≥S+t… series of worldcycles and its reproductions explains it all.

 In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

And this explains ALSO why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT FROM ANOTHER ANGLE:

BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

To perceive you must be still as when you take pictures: motion blurs information as entropic motion and informative form are the Inverse СMOTIONS of time, which only energetic reproduction and its m x v momenta mixes and balances and the universe conserves.

And so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox of the constancy of speed (the reason which when I was a kid, at 8, reading Asimov’s guide to science, came to my mind as the biggest question to resolve in my long quest for ‘whys’.

So we write: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

So we change the canonical definition of time in Galileo (and Einstein’s refinement) substituting the term of time for information: v=s/Ti. Thus the being with more form has lesser speed as it moves in stop-reproduction of form through motion-stop. And when the system has maximal density of form, obviously there is more to reproduce across all its scales of the fifth dimension, from its particles, through atoms, molecules, matter/cells, super organism  etc. While the maximal speed is that of light, because it has the MINIMAL information to reproduce.

And then gravitation that is invisible to us hence v=s/0 information must be infinite, non-local in speed. And inversely the densest vortex of gravitational information, the black hole IS ALWAYS STILL as it is in its own static frame of reference as the most attractive vortex of time.  So when a black hole appears on earth:

It will absorb very fast the planet because it is a ‘seed’, of minimal size and maximal time cycles. Which Hawking’s equation describe if he had not mistaken the Сmotion of time to the past evaporating them. On the contrary correction of the Сmotion of time of its equation towards the future yields an enormous fast growth of the black hole, as it cools down/slows down its clocks, while growing. So that is exactly what will happen: the hot black hole will evaporate us according to the laws of thermodynamics, as hot systems are more active and DO COOL DOWN, DO NOT GET HOTTER. OR your coffee in a colder environment gets hotter? Sooo obvious.

So in the middle between maximal c-speed of reproduction of minimal information and zero speed of maximal black hole information the rest of beings, including us move reproducing all its scales of Information. So when you move your hand through all the scales of being you must reproduce all those scales to finally form your hand. What reproduces is NOT matter but form in motion, in action in-form-a(c)tion.

You are the vital information which becomes imprinted in ever-changing, indistinguishable, repleceable CHNO atoms. As your ‘real first scale’ of being, as a ternary superorganism of relational space-time, is your ∆-1, cellular genetic scale; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.

Mathematical reproduction: topological networks and e-π phi constants.

In the graphs, we see simple, basic motions of the lowest scales of particles and waves, which move reproducing in a lower scale. Moreover modern topology describes forms always as topological networks.

So to define a single space-time continuum form we need at least two scales, that of parts and wholes which form together a topological network of any of those 3 varieties:

So when we talk of a truly transformative motion in the fifth dimension which does NOT surface back into the ∆-scale as reproductive motions and topological transformations of networks do, we need two jumps in the fifth dimension.

How the mathematical depiction of those reproductions take place? Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.

As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time Сmotions. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5Ð planes.

So back to the ternary games, as all sequential forms in time are ternary, waves do have 3 ‘colours’ of red-entropy, green-reproduction and blue-information, which the mind mirror of visual languages reflects in its vision. BUT in stillness, as only a still singularity perceives form in focus.

And so all waves reproduce in ternary packets, expressed trough π trigonometric functions and all systems have ternary structures and ternary horizons of evolution, ternary families of masses and particles, and all forms of growth can be mapped with e-functions and phi functions.

Since we shall not cease to repeat, mathematics is an extraordinarily well-focused mirror of reality but it does NOT create it, it merely reflects it with its synoptic spatial points and sequential temporal numbers (no, set theory and the axiomatic method are NOT the proper foundation of experimental mathematics, yet another offspring of the idealist school of germany, which brought us among other things Marxism, Nazism and the axiomatic method, where Hilbert, ‘imagined points, lines and planes’, in the paroxysm of the creationist school – THE UNITS OF MATH are as always have been, spatial points and sequential time numbers that mimic the properties of the substances that create reality, space and time).

But try to explain a mathematical physicist that the infamous h-planck spin ‘action’ of ‘energy and time’ is NOT an abstract ‘mathematical measure of uncertainty’, whatever that means (their definition) but the UNIT OF TIME CLOCKS or ‘angular momentum’, of the electronic world… that a plane is not imagined but the image mirror of bidimensional cycles of time and information, and so on… All this is stuff 5Ð corrects as only a philosopher of science can have that wider view. 

Fractal reproduction in a discontinuous Universe.

Yet reproduction is immediate with the definition of time=motion with cyclical form as the substance of reality. As cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops. Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science, which are precisely those repetitive motions. Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalized to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.

Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its in-form-ation. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.

But because the universe is fractal, made of scales, obviously we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows one scaling down, disorganizing wholes into parts and this is the meaning of the arrow of entropy=death; we shall call the fourth dimensional motion of time-space, and one scaling up, organizing parts into wholes that we shall call the fifth dimensional motion of time-space  to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it such awesome infinite, immortal reality as it brushes our egos to be so diminutive on it.

All this said none of the above obvious facts and structure of all the systems of the universe is ever acknowledge by mankind on the contrary, eusocial love and organicism is completely taboo in the dog-eat-dog, military capitalist view of biology, born in the British empire the past century. So we shall study now another key ‘scientific biased denial of our ‘cultural sciences’ to uphold the sacred view of its ‘animetal cultures’:

In the graphs, fractal systems are self-generated by seeds of its cellular scale, which encode all its information, compressed in very limited space (an equation, a DNA code, a Unification equation that generates the ‘Ðimotions’ and forms of the Universe). Then the seed replicates its form in ‘biological radiations’ that multiply the fractal cells of the system, which finally follow the plan of network evolution of all systems, recreating the original species.

The process follows a series of ‘beats’ that change the Сmotion of time of the system from reproductive, energetic waves to informative, self-organizing phases in a pattern proved mathematically for chemical systems by Mehaute, which showed in the 80s that for time to continue when a system was not releasing Ðimotions’; it had to create fractal information, the 2nd Сmotion of time in the Universe. Thus, the Universe never stops its Ts->O->Ts rhythms.

When ‘Ðimotions’ ceases is because the feed-back equation changed side. In Nature those micro-structures detach themselves from the being and absorb Ðimotions’ in the environment growing in size, self-replicating. So the fractal transmission of form is the most important event taken place in the Universe. From genetic information transferred between living beings through a fractal process of palingenesis to the creation of mental ideas that we convert into bigger machines, fractal replication between different planes of fractal space-time with finite dimensions, is the essence of reality.

Fractal, transcendental reproduction iterates cells and reorganizes them in decametric scales of growing social complexity till reaching a limit number of 1010-11 cellular units. The organization of those scales follows a simple law:

‘Ðimotions’ flows from ∆-1 into a future st-scale: Ts-1->St.

Information flows from st into a simpler ∆-1 scale: ∆ST>E∆-1.

Reproduction happens in the same ∆-scale ΣS∆<=∆ST

Since those planes are networks existing with different space-time constants, disconnected from the other planes, how a given space-time scale, the cellular or atomic scale, relates to its higher st-plane? Riemann hinted at such scalar structure of space with his analysis of Riemannian surfaces, polynomial planes which communicate through a nСmotion path that transfers Ðimotions’ and information between them. Those paths between light and gravitational space are in Relativity ‘Rosen Bridges’ – black holes and other massive regions of the Universe. Yet the concept can generalize to any dual system, in which there are asymmetric flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, according to a fundamental law of fractal space-time:

Information flows from the macro-plane of relative future to the micro-points of simpler ‘Ðimotions’ flows from the micro-points, ∆-1 from past to the relative, more evolved future macro-points, from the microcosms to the macrocosms.

Thus there is an asymmetric, hierarchical single flow of information from a relative future, the higher ∆+1 plane, to a relative past, ∆-1 plane and vice versa, a fact which explains the lack of parity of ‘temporal, informative flows’ (weak forces in physics, hierarchical social classes in sociology, etc.)

Thus the order between those scales is hierarchical. Species in different planes of space-time interact within each other transferring ‘Ðimotions’ and information. Yet the bigger structures control and order the smaller pieces – its parts that become wholes through the Сmotion of life or disintegrate those wholes back into parts through the process of death. Such interaction is possible because in those different Planes, from microcosms to macrocosms, ‘Ðimotions’ and information have self-similar forms that make the shapes of atoms similar to the forms of galaxies and stars. And follow self-similar isomorphisms of harmony. In terms of hierarchical order, we observe that the bigger an entity is in space, the longer it lasts in time, ΣS<=>St. That is, the amount of time and space of the different structures of the universe is in balance. While in terms of hierarchy the bigger scale orders and transfers information to the smaller scale that transfers mainly ‘Ðimotions’ to the bigger form. Those 2 Сmotions of time, ‘Ðimotions’ and information imply that the bigger scale or network – for example, the nervous system in man – controls the lower scale of cells, which in turn feeds the upper scale.

So we describe Temporal, Organic fractals with 2 terms of increasing complexity: a fractal system or network, which is incomplete, since it doesn’t reproduce internally and might not be able to self-organize itself, but requires the collaboration of an external agent; and a (super)-organism in which the Сmotion of reproduction is internal, iterating the initial fractal units of ‘Ðimotions’ and information into 2 networks that finally combine its ‘Ðimotions’ and information creating the 3rd reproductive network that perpetuates the self-sufficient species.

In biology such processes of self-organization and reproduction of parts into wholes are called Palingenesis – a term, which complex sciences that use both the jargon of physics and biology, extracting self-similar isomorphisms that apply to all those scales, uses also to describe physical processes of creation of matter and social processes of creation of cultures. Since all social and physical systems display complex, palingenetic behavior, from physical particles to organisms, from minds to nations.

All of them constantly reproduce seminal information – called åctions of ‘Ðimotions’ and time in the quantum world, offspring in living organisms, ideas in the linguistic mind, technology and culture in human societies. And in all those cases, the seminal information grows into a species self-similar to the mother. So forces reproduce particles, cells become organisms and nations create self-similar cultures, called colonies.

All of them are organic fractals whose different planes (the cellular, individual and social planes) are connected by flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: Life reproduces in a smaller space-time plane (∆-1) seminal seeds that grow into replicas of original st-mother; human existence is a travel between 3 Planes of relative existence, the cellular Plane (∆-1), the organic, individual Plane (st) and the social Plane in which a human can be considered a cell of a social organism, a nation, religion or civilization (∆+1). But electrons (st) also produce smaller photons (∆-1) that evolve into new electrons, which become cellular units of electric flows (∆+1); while galactic black holes (st), made of billions of social quarks (∆-1) emit flows of matter that evolve into new galaxies, cells of Universes (∆+1).

Thus, Social Palingenesis explains also why in all the scales of the Universe, the geometry of ‘Ðimotions’ and information remains invariant; since a ∆+1 Plane is born by the social evolution of ‘Ðimotions’ bits and information bits of the inferior Plane, which repeat its self-similar forms in all the multiple, self-similar relative ‘planes of existence’ of the universe, from the atom to the galaxy, from the cell to the factory. Thus, social palingenesis is not exclusive of living organisms. All systems display those complex, social Planes.

The 2 simplest particles of the Universe self-reproduce and socialize: quarks absorb ‘Ðimotions’ and reproduce smaller quarks. Electrons produce a seminal light ray that becomes a new electron. So happens to the heavier form we know: the black hole, which reproduces its form when crossing through a star. Even the Universe is a space-time fractal, which might have reproduced its ‘cellular’ particles in the big/bang.

Recap. All systems of the Universe reproduce through a fractal, palingenetic process, in which the system produces a seed of information that reproduces and evolves socially till surfacing in the same plane of existence that the parental form.

Complex, reproductive motions.

In the Universe there is a simplex cycle, e<=>St, that converts ‘Ðimotions’ into cyclical motions, and can at best be made to exist in 3 dimensions (spherical motions) of space and 3 of time (expansive youth, or big-bang, steady state and implosive 3rd age). Yet complex motions – acts of reproduction and social evolution – are different from simplex motions, in as much as they take place between at least 2 planes of different space-time. This difference between the simplex and complex Сmotions of time creates jumps between space-time planes:

The most complex phenomenon of the Universe is the fractal jump in space-time. Both bidimensional cycles of time, and planes of space are fractal and so their changes and displacements are also fractal. And since time is geometric, bidimensional, as space is, it has also 2 directions of motion.

So the oldest fractal question of philosophy is: how can continuous movement exist in a fractal world filled with discontinuities? Zeno, a Greek philosopher, put the example of Achilles running against a Turtle: Achilles will never reach the turtle because there are infinite fractal spaces it has to cross. Parmenides gave him the answer: continuous movement doesn’t exist in a discreet Universe; it is a mirage of the senses. Since a wave is not really moving, but reproducing information over the potential ‘Ðimotions’ of the vacuum in a sequential, fractal jump, through a series of wave-lengths, drawn one after another, which appear to the senses as a moving wave. Movement is always a discontinuous displacement either in space or in time, in any of its 2 directions, towards the past or the future.

The simplest analogy is a television screen where new images are created constantly without hardly any cost of ‘Ðimotions’, because they are virtual images created by illuminating 3 colors that are already potentially in the screen. In the case of a wave, the relative ‘Ðimotions’ imprinted by the logic form might vary, from the vacuum ‘Ðimotions’ of a light wave to the placental ‘Ðimotions’ of a mother, yet the process is always the same: a form imprints another region of space, changing its spatial position and temporal morphology.

So speed is synonymous of reproduction, the main cyclical action of the Universe. Thus we can explain all physical events in terms of organicism. Since even movement – the external, mechanical change physicists study – turns out to be also an organic cycle of reproduction. We distinguish, according to their quantity of ‘Ðimotions’ and information ‘translated’ in the process from a place of space-time to another place, 3 fractal, reproductive jumps:

– S=T: Space-time reproduction dominant in spatial displacement that implies a minimal movement of information that fluctuates from a future to a past form and returns back to the future. For example, when an electric impulse arrives to the end of a nerve, it becomes translated into chemical information and then it is transferred chemically through the synapses to the other cell, where it becomes translated back into electric information.

That process implies a ‘spatial, fractal jump’ from a neuron to the next neuron, but also a fractal jump in time from a level of informative complexity, the electric language to the lower level of chemical languages, which is the relative, past informative system of life. The informative essence of the process implies a transcription of form from each discontinuous point to the next point but also a movement in space, since ‘all yang has a drop of yin’, all is temporal ‘Ðimotions’, also spatial and temporal reproduction requires a minimal dual movement in time and space.

-Max. Ts: Spatial, wave reproduction of a wave a particle that jumps from one place to the next place, reproducing a minimal temporal form. It is very common in physical waves, defined by its speed of reproduction, V=S/T. Depending on the density of a form, its speed of reproduction will vary. So the most massive forms are slower than those whose informations are minimal and can imprint the ‘Ðimotions’ of vacuum very fast. Those forms that hardly move however evolve a lot in time:

– Max. St: Temporal, palingenetic reproduction, when an organism produces a past, smaller, simpler seed that reproduces the being, evolving faster towards the future. So a fetus is ‘born’ when it comes out of the body of the mother to the next discontinuous region of the Universe, making a minimal spatial jump and a huge evolutionary, temporal jump.

Recap. There are 3 types of reproduction: self-reproduction by a complementary system that mixes its ‘Ðimotions’ and information, without concourse of external agents; spatial reproduction, or motion of a wave that imprints a simple form of ‘Ðimotions’ as it translates in space and enzymatic reproduction when an external agent assemblies the parts into a whole.

The Universe is a fractal of knots of Time Сmotions.

It is now clear what reality is: a series of knots of Time Сmotions, which latter we will formalize as ‘Non-Euclidean points’. Such points are in constant communication with self-similar points, reproducing their form and evolving socially into networks. The reproduction of form takes place in a fractal manner, by producing ‘seeds’ in a microcosmic, ‘lower plane of existence’, which latter grow. The networks are built with flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that tie those points. And the result of those simple, yet repetitive processes of reproduction and social evolution is the creation of a world of ‘herds’, ‘cellular organisms’ and networks, extending through multiple scales of size in which the forms of ‘Ðimotions’ and information and the structures and isomorphisms that build super-organisms remain invariant.

In physics, scientists talk of the invariance of motions discovered and generalized by Galileo and Einstein (Relativity). Yet we must ad in the fractal paradigm two new invariances, the invariance of scale – the same Time Сmotions take place in all scales; and the invariance of topological form – the same shapes of ‘Ðimotions’ and information emerge and repeat themselves in all scales (though, and this is essential for the reader to learn how to compare them, they are topological forms, where the ‘distances’ and sizes are relative, so what is conserved is the overall ‘lineal, planar shape’ of energetic functions, such as lineal limbs, lineal weapons, planar membranes; the cyclical, hyperbolic shape of reproductive cycles, which combine ‘Ðimotions’ and information to recreate a form, such as those of your body organs or the cycles of an assembly factory or a mitochondria, and finally the toroid, convex, warped, cyclical forms of informative organs, such as a brain, a camera or an eye or a black hole.)

Those 3 invariances create a new ‘paradigm’ of science, no longer built on the belief of a single Сmotion of time, a single space-time continuum and a single clock-speed to measure it. The result of course is a more complex reality, but that was to be expected. We, humans are just one of the many games of existence of that fractal Universe, and it should not be expected that we are, regardless of our anthropomorphic myths, different from the rest, and able to fully understand in the diminutive brain all what exists, unless we simplify it.

What this work tries to do is to return to a minimal degree of complexity to be able to understand the fractal knots of times, which imprint the ‘Ðimotions’ of reality with its information, constantly reproducing their form and playing the game of existence, constantly achieving the immortality of form.

The Universe is made of ‘time fractals’ that participate both of the properties of mathematical fractals and living organisms. Yet organic fractals are more complex than mathematical fractals, because they have motions. And so the reader should not confuse both terms.

Fractals are mathematical or organic forms, which iterate or reproduce their information in self-similar forms that extend through several scales of size and information which we shall call ‘i’-scales.

They are the most accurate models to depict natural phenomena related to informative growth and reproduction, the essence of life organisms:

Сmotions of Reproduction & Information: ->ΔSt

All fractals originated by a Generator Equation (mathematical jargon) or mother cell, (biologic jargon) iterate=reproduce a series of self-similar fractals, called a set in mathematics or a family in biology:

Mother/Generator Cell: ->Σ∆-1 fractal family/set

The paradox of fractals is that the smaller the fractal scale is the more information it accumulates and the more detail it has. How this is possible? Because information is form-in-action, form with motion, and so the logic paths that systems use to process information are completed faster in lesser space. Further on, in physical systems the cyclical speed and frequency of a vortex with form (a mass or an eddy) increases when the vortex is smaller (VoxRo=k). So the increase of ‘cyclical speed’ diminishes geometrically with size. This result can be generalized to any system of knots of time. So the metabolism of small animals is faster than that of big ones. The cycles and clocks of atoms are faster than those of our scale, faster than those of the cosmological scale. The same can be said of geometric fractals: a Mandelbrot fractal holds more information in its smaller scales, as we enlarge them.

However, there is a fundamental difference between the logic, linguistic fractals of the mind and the physical Universe: While static, ideal, mental mathematical forms can be of any shape, as movement and friction don’t test their efficiency, in the Darwinian Universe only forms of Nature whose properties allow the being to process efficiently ‘Ðimotions’ and information, survive. Thus, mathematics is an ideal language that can create any form, but in the Universe forms have to be efficient in their motion/function and parallel form. Thus, in Physics and Biology we add movement to the mental shapes of geometry, which enormously reduces the possible shapes.

Movement acts then as a ‘reality check’, an Occam’s razor that eliminates all complex forms, which won’t be able to move properly under friction, stress, turbulences and other obstacles proper of the real world. A Mandelbrot fractal might be very beautiful. But it wouldn’t be able to move very fast, and its attached microforms probably would break with an air stream.

So there are no such fractals in the Universe. Instead, we find physical entities made of cycles and lines in movement, for reasons of biological efficiency. Since a lineal movement is the shortest, most efficient path between 2 points. On the other hand, information is cyclical, because a sphere accumulates the maximal quantity of form in minimal space. While a cyclical rotation is the movement with less friction and the only one, apart from the line of ‘Ðimotions’, that maintains the self-similarity of any form, even in trans-form-ations of size. A fact that explains, in terms of survival efficiency, the morphological invariance of ‘Ðimotions’ and information shapes at scale.

Since Mathematical fractals lack, as pure forms of mental information, the energetic dimension of movement and growth, their fractal sets are attached to the Mother- cell’s boundary, where the self-similar forms nest, as in the case of the well-known Mandelbrot set. On the other hand organic fractals not only iterate their information as mathematical and mental fractals do, but also make it grow. Species are not mathematical but organic fractals, whereas the word organic refers to the non-mathematical properties of existential entities, which are better described with visual and logic/verbal languages. Those Biological theories of Time (Evolution theory, Theory of Organisms) include also the logic of survival that extinguishes the less fit – hence a relative past species – and reproduces the fittest, hence the future species; and it includes the visual languages that give movement to the forms of ‘Ðimotions’ and information described by mathematics.

Nature’s fractals combine the Сmotion of ‘Ðimotions’ and the Сmotion of information in an organic way.

They differ from geometric fractals in their dynamism and capacity to absorb ‘Ðimotions’ from their environment. They not only iterate their form in microcosmic scales, but feed their offspring of information till they grow into full replicas of themselves. It is precisely the combination of both Сmotions what makes the behavior of an organism more complex and varied than the behavior of a mathematical fractal. So in the study of natural fractals, we have to add to the informative Сmotion – whose isomorphisms we deduced from the study of mathematical fractals and informative seeds – the ‘Ðimotions’ Сmotion of ‘Ðimotions’ that thermodynamics has analyzed:

‘Ðimotions’, young Сmotion: Ts> ∞ x St->0            X     Ts->0 x St->∞: Information, old Сmotion

For any Σ number of cycles: ΣSp x ΣSt = Organic fractal ΣSe<+>ΣT Organic cycle

The understanding of fractal processes provides a more detailed, scientific analysis of those processes. In that sense, unable to define information with the same rigor used to define the Сmotion of ‘Ðimotions’ and ‘Ðimotions’ physicists have ignored for centuries events connected to the Сmotion of information (chaos, turbulences, super-conductive and super-fluid phenomena, etc.). Physical events and particles are also subject to both Сmotions, as everything else in the Universe. Thus we define abstract equations (as the back and forth transformation of ‘Ðimotions’ into mass, Ts=mc2) in terms of process of creation and destruction of information.

A single language cannot describe all the information that a certain being has within itself. So mathematical languages are also synoptic, and reduce the total information of the being. And that is the case of a fractal equation, which reduces the entity to its fundamental essence. In that regard, the Theory of Time Сmotions is not Pythagorean, as Quantum Theories often are, in the sense that it does not consider the Universe to be made of mathematical entities, but merely affirms that among the linguistic mirrors that can map out the Universe, mathematics is undoubtedly the key language to represent the trajectories, cycles and motions of its species.

Because all languages observe the Universe, humans ‘talk’ those Сmotions of time with logic, verbal, visual, and mathematical languages. Since the syntax of verbal thought with its ternary structure and of visual forms with is line-cycle-wave structure and red-green-primary colors describe entities constructed with those Сmotions.

Recap. The Universe is based in 3 types of invariance, invariance of motions (Galilean relativity, now applied to the invariance of the 4 Сmotions/motions of time), invariance of scale (self-repetition of the same processes and Сmotions in all scales of size) and invariance of topological form (self-repetition of the ‘Ðimotions’ and information shapes of reality. The 3 invariances define a Universe better described with the mathematical isomorphisms of fractals geometries, based in the existence of a generator equation that constantly reproduces information, creating networks of self-similar points, which structure all realities we see. The difference between a mathematical and an organic, Universal fractal is evident: organic fractals do have motion and their processes of reproduction and evolution are far more complex than those of mathematical fractals. So we must depart from a nСmotion-minded mathematical-only approach to study those fractal systems and consider mathematics one of the main but not the only language to describe its organic properties.

The 3 elements of all fractal beings.

We see a static, simple Universe in our relative human ‘plane of existence’. Yet reality is organic, extended from microcosmic to macrocosmic ‘dimensions or scales’, and dynamic, as all particles and forces have movement-’Ðimotions’ and form, in-form-ation; and all of them are structured into networks, which share their ‘Ðimotions’ and information. Those 3 elements: bites and bits of ‘Ðimotions’ and information; networks and scales define the structure of all natural fractals, including the Universe.

They can be formalized with the Generator Equation we use to formalize the Сmotions of ‘Ðimotions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. Since we defined Universal fractals as ‘fractals of Time Сmotions’, hence both concepts a fractal Universe and a Universe made of knots of self-repetitive Time Сmotions are the same. We observe different degrees of complexity in a chemical or mathematical fractal, in a fractal organism or in the fractal Universe; but those 3 essential elements repeat themselves, to the point that scientists use similar terminology for all of them:

– The elementary, iterative unit-cells of a fractal, which according to the duality of Universal Сmotions, will consist on relative bites of ‘Ðimotions’ and bits of information. Those bits and bites are not static forms, but Сmotions that exchange ‘Ðimotions’ and information; flows and cycles that the organism repeats constantly, generating self-similar forms. So we can define a simple iterative, cyclical equation with 2 terms, the 2 Сmotions of the Universe, which can be considered the generative cycle of all Natural Fractals:

∆: Fractal Cycle: Ts<=>St (dynamic state)+Ts X St (static, formal state)

The networks or systems of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that organize those cells into bigger structures.

How feed-back cycles of ‘Ðimotions’ and information grow into complex organisms, made of many cycles?

-In time through processes of discontinuous reproduction and evolution, which create similar action-reaction cycles, cells and organisms in other parts of the Universe. Most natural fractals have a dual network structure that attracts the micro-cells of the organic fractal by distributing the 2 Сmotions of ‘Ðimotions’ and information to them. For example, in a human fractal, the nervous system delivers bits of information and the blood system delivers bites of ‘Ðimotions’, control together its cellular units. In the Universe the same roles are played by the informative, attractive, gravitational force, and the electromagnetic ‘Ðimotions’ forces.

-In Space through the organization of cellular networks that deliver ‘Ðimotions’ and information to each cell-cycle. Those cell-cycles attach to the networks to process constantly new ‘Ðimotions’ and information in their iterating cycles, creating bigger organic systems, made of multiple, similar forms.

When both iterative processes are combined, the fractal units of the Universe grow in ‘Ðimotions’ through space and evolve its informative complexity in time, giving birth to the infinite combination of those fractal Сmotions that we call species, systems or organisms.

The equation includes an Σ-term to signify the gathering of individual Ts X St units into networks and webs:

ΣSt: Fractal networks: Σ (Ts<=>St) or Σ (Ts X St).

It still looks a simple equation to generate the Universe in its infinite variety. But the Complexity that arises from such simple scheme is enormous when we introduce the 3rd fundamental concept of fractal structures: Dimensionality. Since indeed, space-time cycles can exist theoretically in any number of dimensions. So we should consider in more detail the 3rd element of fractals: the fractal dimensions, planes or scales of existence invisible to human perception through which the fractal exists. They are:

– ∆st: The relative st-scales or dimensions across which fractals extend its organization. We use for the 3 relative scales of size that define most Nature’s fractals, the symbol O for information.

In humans there are 3: the cellular, individual and social scales; as most entities do not exchange ‘Ðimotions’ and information beyond its upper and lower organic level. For example, humans, as individuals belong to a relative st-scale, and are aware of social tasks (our ∆+1 plane of existence) and cellular sickness (our ∆-1 plane), but the events that affect the galaxy, the macrocosms to which our planet belongs (st+2) or affect our molecules, the lower microcosms that make up our cells (st-2), hardly affect our existence. Thus depending on the detail and scale at which we observe most fractals we perceive a fractal cycle (minimal size and detail), a fractal cell or a fractal organism (max. detail and size):

Natural Fractal= ΣΣ∆-1 Cycles > Σst-Cells->∆+1 Organism.

How many elements in space make up a fractal, social network? The most obvious structure is a ‘tetraktys’, already considered by Pythagoras to be the magic number of the most perfect social networks. The reason is that a tetraktys can be written as a system with 3×3+st elements. Imagine then such tetraktys as a triangle with 3 vortices, each with 3 elements that will perform the Сmotions of ‘Ðimotions’, information and reproduction, while the central ∆+1 element that communicates all others will perform the Сmotion of social evolution, representing the entire fractal as a unit of the next st-scale. Thus a tetraktys is a highly efficient form, found in all systems of nature, even in human, social systems: 9 soldiers and a caporal make a platoon and 9 caporals and a captain a division.

Recap: All fractals have 3 elements that define them: Cellular units, networks of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that organize those cellular units, and st-scales in which a self-similar but not equal fractal structure emerges, once and again with the same energetic and informative complementary forms.

Yet the key action of the whole world cycle is the reproductive generation in the mature age of a new seed that in a discontinuous manner ensure the immortality of the whole.

Reproduction of physical, biologic and mental fractals.

In graph, cosmological, chemical, biological and mechanical fractals during their reproduction cycles.

All fractals iterate=reproduce by absorbing ‘Ðimotions’ transformed into fractal information by a Mother cell or external enzyme- as it happens with carbohydrates or machines iterated by ‘enzy=men’.

Unlike mathematical fractals, made of fixed, spatial forms, Nature’s fractals are made of temporal, iterative cycles, in which ‘Ðimotions’ is transformed into information and growth, as the fractal family becomes detached from the mother cells. Organic fractals are not fixed, geometrical forms that merely repeat in spatial scales, void of life and temporal change. They are temporal beings, whose bio-logic cycles and functions reproduce at different scales and time intervals. Since not only space has a fractal structure. Time is also discrete, made of cyclic trajectories that repeat themselves, as it happens with the cycles of a mechanical clock. It is precisely the repetition of the organic cycles of ‘Ðimotions’ feeding and informative reproduction, what makes natural organisms fractal structures. The Universe is made of such temporal, organic fractals that reproduce into multiple clone forms that latter re-organize themselves, giving birth to macro-forms similar to the original ‘cell’.

The most obvious natural fractals are those created by the iterative, repetitive nature of 3-D space. They are similar to mathematical fractals where geometrical form dominates.

For example, an ice crystal is a chemical fractal that jets up triangular, tall spikes, in its relative dimension of height, growing into a fractal; a salt grain is a cubic crystal that reproduces its form as it grows in scale and recomposes itself into huge cubes. While a hurricane fractalizes air streams into a vortex of wind cycles that grow also in height, the fractal dimension of information. Those physical fractals already iterate its form, despite the simplicity of its fundamental elements; since all natural fractals reproduce the shape of the ‘mother-cell’ into multiple clone forms that latter re-organize themselves, giving birth to macro-species similar to the original ‘cell’.

In Biology, fractals are used routinely to explain how the iteration of simplex growth processes gives birth to complex botanic shapes: Branches, leaves and roots are all easily created by the iteration of an initial mother-form. A DNA molecule, which iterates its form both in micro-fragments (amino acids) and at macro-scale (recreating a cell). While a tree repeatedly fractalizes its form in 3 branches, ever slimmer, with less ‘Ðimotions’ but ever increasing the information of the tree.

A human being is also a temporal fractal, made of fractal cells, whose organic functions repeat themselves at individual macro-scale in a longer time-interval: the feeding, reproductive, informative (sensorial), and social behavior of human beings are a macro- repetition of the same cycles that take place in cells. Cells feed on ‘Ðimotions’, absorb information, reproduce themselves and form social groups, as human beings do, at a smaller, faster scale. The fractal sum of those cellular cycles creates a human being. And then, the fractal sum of human cycles at a bigger scale creates socio-biological organisms, called nations and civilizations. A human is an organic, bio-logic, temporal fractal, extended in 3 scales, the cellular, organic and social scale.

Recap. The Сmotion of information and ‘Ðimotions’ together describe all kind of natural fractals, not only the well-known biological fractals but also social and physical systems that display complex, fragmented borders, (from physical particles to organisms, from minds to nations) and constantly re=produce information (åctions in the quantum world, offspring in living organisms, ideas in the linguistic mind, technology and culture in human societies). They are also organic fractals, since once we understand their structure in multiple scales connected by flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, the old distinction between organic and inorganic matter loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role to make man the center of the Universe.

Fractal Reproduction of information.

A mathematical fractal like the Koch curve is an ‘Ðimotions’ line that triples its in-form-ative bits every iterative cycle. But since it doesn’t grow in length, it exhausts its ‘Ðimotions’. An organic fractal also starts as a single cell that clones its in-form-ation. But since it can absorb ‘Ðimotions’, it can iterate billions of times. In both cases what defines a fractal is its reproduction of in-form-ation that bends ‘Ðimotions’ into form, creating the Сmotion of futures. So the abundance of fractals proves the existence of an Сmotion of information in the Universe. We are all fractals, Cantor dust of ‘Ðimotions’ and information: we fractalize so much that finally we lose ‘Ðimotions’, volume and return to the dust from where we departed in the process of death. For that reason, the only solution to death by excess of information is fractal reproduction of a younger micro-form, when the being has enough ‘Ðimotions’ to replicate in a discontinuous zone of space-time, ensuring the immortality of its logic in-form-ation.

The evolution of Time-space requires giving motion to Euclidean geometry. This is done by uniting fractal mathematics and Non-Euclidean Mathematics. Mandelbrot in the 70s considered the fact that self-repetitive forms diminish and grow in scale maintaining its forms invariant. The why of this grow ultimately responds to the Сmotions of reproduction and social evolution: A fractal can be seen as a reproductive process, which is common to all generator equations of information of the Universe.

Fractals can also explain in more detail the reason of aging and the life cycle. The 2 Сmotions of time follow a natural order from yang=young ‘Ðimotions’ into yin=old information, which defines the existential cycle of most beings in the Universe. For example, the life and death cycle can be explained as an iterative process of reproduction of information that degenerates into aging, when the organism has exhausted all its ‘Ðimotions’ in a 3rd age in which instead of reproducing, it wrinkles and fractalizes its cells.

Recap. An organic fractal always iterates its form over new ‘Ðimotions’ not to become fractalized. Yet after a young age, even natural fractals start to lack ‘Ðimotions’ end up becoming wrinkled. In fact, all forms in Nature including the Universe in the future big crunch, suffer some aging process, guided by the time Сmotion of information.

Information theory. Why informative membranes are bidimensional.

For example, Information Theory proved (Shannon) that a perfect Universe with no entropy in which information can be transferred with no loss must be a 4D Universe with a 2D coding language (0,1 in his studies), which transfers messages of 10D spatial elements.

H (entropy) = p1 logs(1/p1) + p2 logs(1/p2) + … + pk logs(1/pk)

H = 0: -> Dimensional being: 4 D, equal value dimensions;   Information message = 2 D;   Spatial length-> 10 D

And we shall see that in the ‘perfect Universe’, information membranes as the screen/page you are reading, has 2 dimensions, X≈Y>>>Z, and systems perceive only the external membrane of information of the system, where the sensorial feelers are. And we shall see that in space the fundamental form, the triangle has a canonical form, the tetraktys, of 10 elements, where the central point communicates and organizes all others, as the zero-point of the triangle, which transcends into a unit of larger 10-dimensional scale, which will be the fundamental scale of organization of the 5th dimension.

This example that connects Information Theory with 2-manifold geometry and the relational model of space-time is the kind of insights we shall reveal constantly in our analysis of the Universe with relational space-times, which will show the whys of an interconnected Universe where all the discoveries of different sciences find its harmonic whys in the laws of Cyclical space-times.

  • This simple equation, Ts>ST>St, which describes all systems as assembles of 3 topological varieties has its symmetry in the causal logic of time cycles, which is no longer a lineal single time Сmotion of future, but as all cycles, do have 3 relative phases, the initial, energetic accelerated impulse of maximal energy or young, past age (Ts), the steady state, inertial constant speed of the reproductive/body wave or present age, and the final informative age or St or warping of energy into cyclical form. Thus we shall find 3 phases or ages in all systems, from gaseous, energetic, liquid, steady state, solid, informative state of matter, to the young, energetic, mature, reproductive and old, informative age, to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s equations that describe a Universe ‘warping space into time’.

And so the ‘spatial topologies’ of bidimensional space have its symmetries in the 3 ages of time, which constantly, warp, >, energy into information, till all energy is exhausted and then in a single time cycle, information explodes back into lineal energetic space, in the moment of death: St<<Ts.

Thus we can define a worldcycle for all species between birth and extinction and 3 Сmotions of time, expansive past, repetitive present and informative future, which can move forward (life Сmotion) or backwards (death Сmotion), causing a zero sum which makes the Universe immortal as all life Сmotions are cancelled by death Сmotions, all particles by antiparticles (that are explosions of energy in zero time, and have past Сmotions in Feynman diagrams).

And this fascinating understanding of the 3 Сmotions of time cycles, and its complex ternary logic, which substitutes the Aristotelian, past-entropy single Сmotion models of absolute lineal space-time, inaugurates an entire new discipline of logic, symmetric to our widened discipline of 2-manifolds and non-Euclidean fractal points.

Thus since the Universe is in terms of logic ternary, Non-Aristotelian, and in terms of mathematical space, topological, Non-Euclidean we talk of the formal, logic-mathematical new model for the study of cyclical time and fractal space, as the discipline of ∆-topo-logy. I-topology is thus the formalism of cyclical, fractal space-time.

This ∆-topo-logical Universe, and its 2 formalisms, Non-Euclidean geometry of fractal 2-manifold points and the Existential ¬Æ=ilogic of time cycles and its ages between birth and extinction, requires only a 3rd set of formal principles to complete its scientific analysis, the metric of the 5th dimension, that is the organization of all the relative scales of parts into wholes and the classification of its ‘åctions of space-time, ∂( æ,e,ï,œ,û).

This can be done departing from the new co-invariance, Ts x St = ST0±4, which merely expresses that as we become smaller in size our time cycles accelerate, but the product of both parameters which are closely related to the energy and information of the system remains constant (as energy is stored in the fractal points that create the smooth continuities we call absolute spaces, when we do not distinguish those points from atoms in a water space to strings and photons in a vacuum space; and information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles).

Again this co-invariant law applies to all systems, and explains when the specific number of dimensions and cyclical forms are clearly defined, all kind of laws. In physical systems it explains from the vortex law, Vo x Ro = K, to the Kepler’s laws (the inner planets turn faster), to the meaning of charges and masses, which are according to Einstein’s correspondence principle accelerated vortices of the larger cosmic scale (gravitational vortices≈ masses) and the lower atomic scale (charges≈accelerated electromagnetic vortices), its hierarchy (charges turn faster and have more curvature≈form, hence more information and are also more attractive as attraction≈speed of vortex), and it will allow us to deduce the equation of Unification of forces.

While in biological systems explains the law of metabolism (rats process energy and information faster than elephants), the laws of genetics (which code information of larger systems), and the entropy and chirality laws (lower U scales have more information and larger scales more motion, hence information transcends from lower to upper scales as in genetics but not the opposite – no Lamarckian evolution; while motion transfers perfectly from upper to lower scales – so when we move all cells and atoms do move synchronically but lower scales of molecular heat do not transfer fully to the upper scale).

Thus entropy is defined in terms of transfers of energy between scales and information such as there is entropy in U-∆<U transfers, but not in U<U-∆ transfers, and U≈U-∆ transfers (Shannon’s laws of informative communication).

But this chirality, which explains the 4th non-spatial, temporal form (electro-weak force that trans-forms particles and has no spatial range), and many other phenomena, which constantly increases information across planes (reproduction of messages) and upwards, (Genetic information) is Balanced by the explosive destruction of information from upper scales in Death-energetic processes, which do destroy information ‘two scales downwards’, from the human scale to the atomic scale, from the material scale, through big-bangs to the radiation scale. Thus information constantly creeps across planes and upwards: i>∆+1 but this long slow life Сmotion is balanced by the explosive, no-time big-bangs of death, i<<∆-2.

Linguistic fractals. Paradox of inflationary information.

Minds can also be modeled as fractal systems that replicate the forms and movements of the Universe in a smaller scale, through the syntax and semantics of a certain language. Indeed, modern science concentrates in the study of the parallelisms between the hardware of the mind, the neuronal brain, and its software, the depiction of the Universe made with visual and verbal languages. But what truly matters is the bio-logical parallelism between those mental structures made of syntactic and semantic, fractal units (numbers, geometrical forms, phonemes and sentences), and the external Universe they map out. Since organisms survive thanks to their accurate, mental perception that orientates them in that bigger Universe. So fractal minds are a fundamental tool of evolution: The mind acts as a virtual, fractal mirror, allowing the being to interact efficiently with the Universe, absorbing ‘Ðimotions’ and information from it to replicate its form. This means that we can study minds as mental fractals similar to its 2 main languages of space-time; mathematics and logic.

For that reason, mental and geometric fractals are both defined as entities whose informative boundary tends to ∞ while the ‘Ðimotions’/space of those boundaries tends to zero:

δe/δt->0 x δi/δt->∞: Mental Fractal.

Thus the information of a mathematical fractal is found in the boundary. It happens also in black holes, where information is attached at the boundary in a bidimensional space (holographic principle, which we proved in a simple manner as result of the 2 dimensions of a cycle of time that carries information and now we can observe from a more complex perspective). It is also the case of the human mind, an i=eye+wor(l)d, created by the eye’s retina and the electromagnetic waves of the cortex brain. Thus the informative parts of organisms, what we call ‘senses’, are also external, attached to the boundary and one of the fundamental functions of Nature’s fractal Сmotion is to create senses, systems of perception of fractalized information. Minds and senses are similar to mathematical fractals. It should not come as a surprise; since mathematics after all is a mind’s language, and minds fix most cycles of Natural fractals into still images that don’t capture the vital ‘Ðimotions’ of the Universe.

Mathematical and real fractals share the properties of information, inverse to ‘Ðimotions’. Information increase when the fractal becomes smaller in its surface. This paradox, that the smallest regions of space hold the maximal quantity of time: Min. St =Min. Ts is however essential to full grasp the Universe.

Languages hold more information than the forms they describe. Information is bidimensional and can be warped and cut. This essential property, that information is in the void, the cut, not the substance, as it will be first perceived by a mind in order to exist, and so it is not real till the perceiver observes it (quantum paradoxes), is however the reason why the smaller regions, in which voids multiply are more conductive to information frequencies that long ones. This paradox already understood by Gödel simplifies the distinction between mathematical physics and reality. Information is inflationary.

The Universe is not all the possible mathematical models. As Riemann, the key mathematician of the XIX C. explained, we cannot consider all possible spaces real, because the physical universe has selected only one geometry6, to which we shall add – it selects the most efficient geometry that maximizes the 4 main Сmotions of time of species and helps the organic, Complementary, Ts X St, bio-logic forms of reality to survive. Unfortunately neither mathematicians nor physicists today accept restrictions to their imagination, so they invent ‘multiverses, cosmic strings, multiple, infinite dimensions’ without ‘upgrading’ the concept of a continuous space into the reality of fractal discontinuous scales. The confusion of languages with reality is one of the main ‘errors’ of science we must resolve in order to improve the ‘logic/mathematical mirror’ the mind uses to perceive reality.

This distinction often lost to physicists in modern times, clearly expressed by Riemann in his ‘foundations of geometry’ and further proved by Gödel implies that not all possible mathematical spaces and mathematical particles exist. The space of the Universe is far more restrictive in form and dimensions than the space of mathematicians.

Why this happens can be explained ‘bio-logically’ by the fact that the inverse function of existence, extinction, eliminates all forms which are not efficient even if it creates them a priori – in the same manner all mutations in Nature, which are not efficient disappears. While our informative mind keeps producing imaginary models of geometry, which are pumped up by the scholar who seeks to convince the world his geometry is also right. For example, in the field of physics, multi-universes, super symmetries, ‘Ðimotions’ in black holes, etc. are mathematical theories with no equivalent in the world because they ignore the Сmotion of information in mass and the need for no more than 2×2 dimensions to construct the Universe.

While the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics in which an organic wave of photons, parts of whole electrons, guided by the 4th Сmotion of organic evolution is considered a herd of ‘probabilities’ is wrong. As in the case of the Mandelbrot set that doesn’t exist in nature, unable to resist energetic motion, in all those cases the 4 main time Сmotions of reality and its need to be performed by all entities that wish to exist, limit the information that becomes real.

All this requires understanding 2 of the basic properties of information – the fact that ‘fractal information’ is constantly created by the motions of reality and the paradox between ‘Ðimotions’ with maximal spatial extension but minimal information vs. information with minimal ‘Ðimotions’ and extension. In brief, information increases, as in fractals, when we diminish in size. So brains are smaller than bodies but have more information. And a language has maximal information packed in minimal space. A language in fact has more information than a huge surface of vacuum space, which makes theories more abundant than the forms we find in the real Universe. Information is inflationary and so are physical theories with bizarre space/times that reality never will select.

Mathematics is, as all languages, an informative, ‘fractal’, whose self-similar forms/theories multiply in excess (ΣSe->0; St->∞). Thus, if certain sentences of verbal thought can be imaginary fictions, despite its beauty, so happens to many ‘quixotic’ geometrical forms, which do not exist. The Universe selects only efficient geometries, based in forms that can move and perform the Сmotions of time in the real Universe. So for example, the most beautiful fractal form of the mathematical Universe, the Mandelbrot set, does not exist in reality, because all its small self-similar attachments would easily break if they were moving as reality does.

Hence the importance of having a geometric theory of space-time that describes accurately the forms of the physical Universe. This was the key discovery of Einstein. He realized that Euclidean, lineal geometry, used to describe ideal space, could not describe the cyclical paths created in gravitational space-time. So he switched in his description of reality to a space called Non-Euclidean, where its minimal fractal unit, the point, could be crossed by multiple gravitational curves and hence, unlike the abstract point of Euclid, it required inner volume, inner form and ‘Ðimotions’. This point, which has always in Nature a region that can absorb /gauge information and a lineal or cyclical, rotational motion, is what we call a Point of View= Measure or Non-Euclidean point of view, the relative unit of Non-Euclidean mathematics.

Philosophers of science have wondered often if mathematics is merely a construction of the mind or an image of reality and why they are all pervading in the description of any ‘system’ of self-similar forms in the Universe. The answer is both: languages are construction of the mind that reflects the external universe’s information in a small space, hence they must reduce the total information to fit the mental mirror, trying also to make an image the closest possible to reality. This is what logic languages do with time and mathematical languages with space; because the Universe is logic-mathematical, albeit of a type of logic and mathematics more complex than the abstractions without motion devised by the Greeks 2300 years ago.

Indeed, the same concept applies to the new logic of time, which is based in multiple causality, either a dual ‘biological causality’ in A<->B events in which an element A is predator and the other B victim; hence B is considered by A mere ‘Ðimotions’ when B considers itself an informative entity worth to exist (so A is both A and B, victim and predator, ‘Ðimotions’ for the predator information for the I-self of the victim); or ‘multiple, spherical causality’, when multiple agents create a certain network or form. So for example a real circle is not drawn in abstract by a single pen, but happens when multiple self-similar points of view converge and form a cycle.

Ultimately we are all made of spatial ‘Ðimotions’ and temporal information, whose synoptic descriptions are achieved with 2 languages, mathematics and logic. And so the search for knowledge by the human mind is not only the recollection of experimental data, but its description with the languages of mathematics and logic. Hence even more important than the collection of data is the creation of a mental container – those 2 languages – efficient and evolved enough to fit properly all the data of reality we observe.

Yet since the revolution of thought represented by Evolution Theory in Biology and quantum /relativity in physics, there is a gap between the behavior of universal entities and the linguistic syntax of mathematics and logic, hardly evolved since 2300 years ago, when Euclid and Aristotle founded those 2 sciences.

Thus, we shall in this work summarize the new advances and isomorphisms of spatial geometry and temporal logic that are needed to describe a complex Universe of multiple, fractal space-times in which points are Complementary systems – entities that gauge and feed on ‘Ðimotions’ with an informative and energetic center (body/brain, field/particle system). What still stands is a simplification of reality to ‘fit’ it into the mind. So while we are not concerned with the specific ‘Ðimotions’ and information the point of view process (the details that don’t fit), we cannot longer hold truth the syntactic errors of Euclidean mathematics (points, lines and planes without breadth, width or height), and Aristotelian Logic (single causal events of the type A->B).

We call the evolved syntax of those 2 space-time languages, i-logic geometry, or simply i-logic geometry (as i represents ‘information’ and it is the next vowel after the A-ristotelian and E-uclidean languages used till now. Yet it also represents a ‘complementary system’ with a cyclical, informative ‘head’, O, and a lineal, energetic ‘limb-body’ |, which are also symbols used in ‘complex algebra’ to represent energetic and informative functions)).

Thus, we affirm that the Universe of multiple space-times follows the complex logic of information or ‘i-logic, fractal geometry’ pioneered in the XIX and XX C. by Darwin, Riemann, Planck, Einstein and Mandelbrot whose discoveries were the first steps of a ‘new paradigm of science’, which this work completes, upgrading philosophy of science (mechanism and monism), stuck in Aristotelian, Euclidean theories since the XVII century. So we shall talk often of the ‘i-logic, fractal paradigm’ as opposed to the ‘A-logic, Euclidean paradigm’ of a mechanical world of single ‘ceteris paribus’ causes and entities which are supposed to exist in a single, continuous, abstract, non-moving space.

The second part of this work after this brief introduction to ‘metaphysics’, the description of the ultimate meaning of existence – the accomplishment of the 4 main Сmotions of time – will be dedicated to the development of those new formalisms of mathematics and logic needed to make detailed, rigorous analysis of the events and forms of natural, organic fractals.

In that regard, since all languages are fractals of the entire Universe perceived in a slower, shorter, memorial pattern, a mirror of information with less dimensions of ‘motion’ and ‘form’ than the original. So these texts could be also considered a fractal, linguistic mirror of all Realities.

Recap: Information is inflationary. So are informative languages, reasons why we must differentiate fictions from theories that truly describe the universe. Multiple Spaces-Times improve our logic and mathematical tools to describe the Universe. This is done advanced the Aristotelian logic and Euclidean geometry into the next vowel of the alphabet: i-logic geometry, the logic and geometry of information.

                                    The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information. Cyclical, temporal reproduction rules.

This is the single expression of reality in its organic terms, function and form. So the question is to properly study in each scale and discipline of reality how the acts of supœrganisms and species, flux into the creation of new similar species, to ensure the immortality of the whole – how the swarm intelligence of reality brings about once and again apperceptively the act of reproduction and conservation of form, of in-form-ation, embedded naturally in the repetitive nature of worldcycles and time cycles, from the simples to the most complex aggregate of them.

In the graph, left, information is stored in the cyclical patterns and frequencies of the ‘closed motions’ of the Universe, which we define as time clocks. Time and information are thus intimately related and so all systems of matter, evolve constantly towards higher degrees of information as those time cycles reproduce their cyclical motions and ‘forms’. So the galaxy is a vortex of information self-centred in the black hole, the physical system that stores more information of the Universe in its ‘cyclical membrane’; and history is a process of evolution of human and metal-information as we evolve constantly in larger social organisms, nations and civilisations and evolve machines from its initial entropic forms (weapons) into information.

The evolution of life can be modelled as a process that tends to increase the evolution of systems, both in species and individuals through its three ages that end in a third age of excess of information, wrinkles and warping. So all systems do evolve increasing its ‘height’ dimension that allows better perception of information from reptiles to mammals, from machines to carbohydrates.

Physical systems MADE OF matter, constantly grow in information as solar systems fall towards the black hole of the galaxy, curved, ‘formed’ by gravitational forces that constantly in-form the galaxy. So the entropic expansive vacuum space between galaxies is balanced by the informative vortex of matter. And this duality between life-information Сmotions-actions and death-entropic-Сmotions actions balanced reality into an immortal Universe. 

In terms of the life-death cycle of all systems, we can say that the longest time passes through the information Сmotion from birth to death, when an entropic e=mc2 big-bang (inorganic matter) or dissolution of informative networks (organic matter) erases it.

And so the zero-sum of all life-death informative-entropic cycles makes the Universe immortal.

Fractal points of topological space, existential ¬Æ=ilogic of symmetric fractal generator…∆nalysis of scales.

It should not surprise you then that the most efficient mind mirror, maths, have 3 disciplines we shall upgrade, geometry of points for space, algebra for sequential time numbers and analysis of finitesimals and wholes, and finally uses mind-centered planes to represent them all, as those are the four elements of reality, we shall upgrade and give more realism. The only big change will be in that sense the substitution of the tools mathematicians use to study symmetry, groups for the symmetries of the fractal generator equation that resumes the 3 x 3 + @ 10 dimensions when studied in detail of a system (3 scales, 3 topologies, 3time ages dimensions and the 10th • mind that puts them all as a whole):

Γ@: ∆-1: Entropy>∆: $p: ‘past, entropic fields-limbs’ <ST-hyperbolic body-waves>O-St-Particles/heads of information>∆+1: Mind≈Γ@

Which is a cyclical form when we connect our linguistic formal view and the mind it ultimately becomes the ice in the cake.

So as you can see the word to find meaning is ‘wholeness’ symmetry of timespace dimensions, S=T, scales, organism…

RECAP. REPRODUCTION OF DIMENSIONS AS THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE.

reality  is a constant game of reproduction of vital dimensions into super organisms through the actions they perform that constantly create and destroy momentum variations (which of course are the variable not studied in the momentum equation of physics unconcerned with those formal dimensions).

So this is the meaning of it all reproduction and extinction of dimensions of space time around s≈t balances, in an overall zero sum infinite hence inexhaustible universe, where ∆ð motions of time is the initial substrata, enclosed by §@, spatial minds that stiffen it into linguistic mappings of it all:

∆@≈§ð

THE 5 Dimensions of reality, the four dimension of entropy, the fifth dimension of the mind, the symmetries of present, the dimension of fractal space and the dimension of cyclical time, can all be seen in symmetric equalities. ∆@ then means the scalar dimension of the mind, §∂

ITERATION is then the 3rd Dimotion which encompasses the more complex elements together, in a hyperbolic inverse geometry of the Energy and Information parameters, however struggling to cope with the equation of equality from where it can generate also an Spacetime system of potentials/limbs of time motion and Singularities of Space.

∆¡>|2|. PHYSICAL REPRODUCTION

Particle-wave Beat: clock-particles enclose energy waves that move them. Motion as reproduction of in-form-ation.

In the graph, the fourth and fifth dimension which further expand the lineal motions and informative particle-heads, in pure expansive motion or entropy as wholes dissolve into parts, and viceversa, condensate enclose and focus parts into wholes through a 5Ð @mind dimension.

The duality of a wave that reproduces st-form along a path and a particle that singularly perceives in stilness gives us the first beat of existence St-t-st-st-t.

The system does is always complementary, with a body-wave that reproduces and moves the system with a particle-head above that stops to perceive. And this will happen across scales of parts and networks, which organise the system in co-existence of scales as organisms do.

Those super organisms then will move through the reproduction of its waves that become ruled by the particle-head of information in a constant stop-perceive/go-reproduce dual s≤≈≥t beat of feed back vital motions.

Space-speed is reproduction of form.

In the graph, a particle moves, reproducing a quantic wave or ‘field of matter’, since in fact all physical movements reproduce a form in a field of energy. Thus the reproductive speed of a wave that imprints a surface of spatial energy is also a quantic jump in space-time. The spatial energy will vary but the process is always the same

The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t,  S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure space-time of the Mind, @.

So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:

We cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times that ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them).

So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale:

All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times hat ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆-1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them). So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆-1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale.

So as wave reproduces,V = Sxƒ, a form of space moves with a relative speed to that of the clock of the observer. The different families of spaces that have the same lineal metric of speed are physical species of reproductive waves.

Existence Is motion through the 5th dimension.

All what exists is a compound systems of motions in time, perceived as forms in space.

6 are the motions in time, generation, growth, evolution,diminution, extinction and locomotion. As all those motions can be explained as motions in the scales of the 5th dimension, we could in a physical view of the Universe, consider all what exist a motion in the 5th dimension.

The commonest of those motions are world cycles of existence, with a pattern of generation, growth, evolution, locomotion diminution and extinction, which completes the existence of any being in the Universe, easily explained with the Generator equation of 5Ð metric:

∆-1: Generation  ∑ Growth (reproduction) > Evolution: Birth: ∆< Young, entropic age (Max. Locomotion) > Reproductive adult age: ∆+1: social age> 3rd Informative age (diminution) << Entropic death (Extinction): ∆-1

The Worldcycle of existence however can be broken down into smaller steps and motions:

There are 3 types of travels through the Universe according to the 3 elements of the 5th dimension: vital spaces, cyclical times and planes of space-time.

  • Spatial travels across a single plane of space-time, studied exhaustively by 4D physics, and expressed through the Hamiltonian rule: maximize your actions, minimize your energy=time expenditure. We shall study briefly those spatial motions, already well described by physicists in our sections of space.
  • Existential, world cycles of life and death across ST±1: When the entire being is transferred through the dimensional planes, from the seminal/quantic ST-1 plane into the ST-individual, thermodynamic plane, where it will suffer a 3 ages/states cycle of youth-gaseous, energetic state, adult, liquid, reproductive age and 3rd solid, old, informative age, to return back in the big-bang death to the ST-1,2 scales. It is thus the world cycle, studied in depth in the ‘section of time’.
  • Communication of energy and information across ST±4 scales through actions: Here we do not travel all together, just share, through certain parts of our selves, energy and information with the larger absolute space-time world. Then e communicate flows of energy and information between planes:

Motion is the simplest time of travels through the 5th dimension are those limited to a single space-time continuum. They have been exhaustively studied by 4D metrics and physics so it is not needed to expand on them. But to clarify its nature as an action or travel across several sales.

However as soon as we want to describe other fundamental facts of reality, such as the life-death cycle or the actions we perform in the Universe and its why, we need to explain true 5th dimensional travels across several scales of space-time. And we divide them into:

  • Nearby travels across ST±1,2 scales, responsible for the life-death world cycle of all species
  • Further travels across ST± 2, 3,4 scales, responsible for the actions of informative perception, energetic motion and feeding which all systems perform in order to survive and continue their existence.

In the graph travels through 4 Dimensions ( a single logarithmic plane) is simpler than travel through several dimensions which implies an asymmetric wave of maximal energy (from wholes to parts or future to past flow) and maximal information from past to future, from smaller to larger units

This inverse flow of energy and information, signified by the duality of entropy and evolution (as two different Сmotions maximised in both asymmetric ±∆  directions), implies an enormous number of whys to common phenomena: from genetics, ∆-1>∆ transfer of information (>) and ∆<∆-1 transfer of energy from wholes to smaller ones.

As the transfer of information ∆>∆-1 is smaller than the transfer of energy from ∆-1>∆, we can then consider an easy ‘unbalance’ of momentum transfer that sets up in fact the journey as a Hamiltonian closed cycle of null final variation of entropy and information.

In thar sense in terms of thermodynamics a time-space cycle is a cycle of zero sum of entropy and information conserving both the angular and lineal momentum and total energy of the system.

The purpose of the actions of all beings, is ultimately to reach discontinuous immortality through its reproduction, as entities which do not reproduce become extinguished. So we shall define reproduction in this post and show that all entities reproduce, since a motion that repeats its form, is in fact reproducing, and time is motion and time is everything. We show then how all systems, physical, biological and social systems do reproduce.

Thus if we were to pick up a single function on the Universe, we would say that all is about conservation of present through the dynamical reproduction of its forms. Even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction, as  the previous graph from the 92 book, ‘god, man and universe’ shows.

Reproduction is the essential game of the Universe – to iterate information, first – and then evolve it up and down the block of time of possibilities, along the informative and entropic dual Сmotions that take the system out of balance. There is no mystery to it, as forms become with time implosive and explosive, so if reproduction did not dominate the game, the universe would die away, and would not be immortal (as reductionist physics with models of a single Сmotion of time) expect.

Momentum is a present ‘dharma’, a minimal step, an action. And the sum of those actions of existence, reproduced with different beats and rhythms, creates a wave of reproduction.

What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.

Thus the main action of exi=st¡ence is reproduction, achieved in the age of balance, when the motion an form of the being, exi imprints on its lower ∆-1 field of space-time, bringing both together into an exi=st-ential form. To reproduce once and again, ∑exi=st, and maximise that function, Max. ∑exi=st, becomes then for all systems, the purpose of exi=st¡ence. The many jargons and languages we can use to mirror that process are just details of the ‘large picture’. The series of actions that bring re=production into fruitful realisation tend to be similar, departing from the monad, which first:

i: perceives->a:moves to fields ->e: of energy where it feeds, or meets an inverse ‘mirror symmetry’ (gender) communicating with it ï-> to finally reproduce->œ & in the most successful reproductive waves, it will evolve socially into a new whole, a new Universal->∑œ=U

All actions, are partial equations of the acronym expression of the generator (entropy=motion, information, reproduction, exi, ∑exi= social evolution is really all what is about the game for those ‘beings-monads’ who successfully still exi=st.

Dûst, momentums of the function of existence, journeying to perform its survival actions, trying Tº exi≈st, combining all its actions of existence with the aim of survive not as individual but as ‘clone form’ -that is, simply speaking the art of living, which is the same for any monad, on charge of a supœrganism of any scale of the Universe. Moreover the game of each monad is not only the same but when adjusted in terms of its ∆-metric (Ts x St) it gives us similar range of space-time actions, as smaller beings live shorter but act faster..

Because points are constantly gauging information and feeding on energy, the most common events of the Universe are the absorption of waves of energy and form and its communication between 2 points that share energy and form.

In the graph, we observe some basic acts of communication in which self-similar complementary species exchange energy and form in actions that bond them. Human sexual species communicate information and energy (social love) but also seminal particle that combine both reproducing a self-similar being (sexual love); fermions, big atomic particles, communicate bosons, smaller particles of forces. Humans communicate with machines through prices and salaries. Thus money is the force of communication that creates the actions of consumption and reproduction=work of machines by human beings. In all those events there will be however different they might seem, certain laws of i-logic geometry, which all systems will follow and will define the outcome of such encounters, according to the 3rd postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry that defines the relative equality between st-points. So certain events are ‘Darwinian’, when species are so different that cannot share information with a common language and so use each other as relative energy, or events of eusocial love if the points are self-similar.

Communication towards a balance of parameters is thus natural to the laws of the Universe.

‘Dimotions’ must be understood in its simplest laws – 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat flows from the hotter to the colder source till balancing both, expansion of a gas till fill uniformly a volume, etc. – as a proof of the function of existence that balances the parameters of all systems. This balancing tendency might seem to favor a final ‘Ðimotions’ or death in disorder of the system but it is more subtle. The system balances to achieve a faster constant switch off of states between energy and information, accelerating the feed-back cycles, E<=>O, which are the dynamism of it all.

This feed-back cycles reduced to the maximal i-rational expression, such as Pi, or √2, means a constant feed-back loop a space-time cycle, TS<=>St…

Now, this will even confuse you more. We defined the present active-reproductive dimension of space-time in other posts as:

Ts (past-entropy-lineal motion)  x  St (Future-form, cyclical motion) = Present-wave reproduction.

And above we saw that a wave speed, V = Ts x St

So a wave strictly speaking is reproducing its form into a present speed over its lower ST=∆-1 plane of existence, feeding on energy, putting its form and reproduction. Motion is truly reproduction of form, in a lower plane of existence and this solves the Zeno’s paradox, why motion is possible? It seems impossible in Zeno’s concept of quantum space-time. Today quantum physicists still have to accurately explain Zeno. Now we explain it. It is in fact impossible because motion is NOT motion but reproduction from quanta to quanta of pure space motion of a form.

And this works with higher planes which have more content of form as mass does. Energy = Mass x C2 is the case.

Strictly speaking we add to the mass, the ∆-3 plane of space-time bidimensional light-space to get that much energy. It is more of a ‘reaction’ than a transformation, but we humans have our ‘limited means of measure’, so that is what we ‘see’. Point.

Strictly speaking a mass moving is ‘interacting with the ∆-3 plane of light-space time also, as the wave of its particles of information is becoming imprinted in each step on the lower planes, it is being redrawn as a wave does step by step, reproducing its form side by side. So speed is reproduction, Ts x St = Present reproduction = Speed. This is truly what happens in ∆ST complex physics. When you move your hand, you redraw your atoms and electronic nebulae from ∆-4 to i step by step. And so it follows that waves which draw only the form spend less time drawing information than masses than human organisms, and so they move faster at c-speed.

So another ¡logic ∆ST way to deduce the previous deduced infinity of speed of gravitational waves:

Max. St = Min. S≈Min.V

And this has two limits: gravitational quanta are perceived as moving at infinite speed because they carry no information and black holes which are forms at 0 K of perfect form, information, seem anchored in their point of view with no motion relative to the Universe that ‘moves around them’.

This advanced analysis for those who have gone so far shows the extraordinary power of ∆ST to explain much more in a logic way than the mere equations manipulated in an artifact of absolute space-time.

This motion thus requires to print a form, departing from the ‘energy’ of the plane. And we can therefore do an explanation of the entire Universe as a reproductive, living organism of present reproductive waves of form with motion.

Energy though will still be dominant in motion. And this is proved by the fact that we do calculate energy and work in physics, considering only the lineal vector of motion not the height-informative component. And so indeed energy is related to motion. We talk of energy as the ‘food’ of motion for cars and planes. Energetic people are people that move a lot. Energy is biased to space-motion.

Ts- energy and St-information are similar combinations of motion and form.

 

 

∆¡<|3|. REPRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL & HISTORIC ECOSYSTEMS.

We escape the analysis of reproduction in biological systems as it is accepted canonical science.

The super organisms of history in space and time. Physiology – the true science of memetics.

all this said, memetics is truly submissive, secondary to physiology, which is the study of the 3 physiological networks that define super organisms. In medicine we say that all sickness are physiological sicknesses. So happens with the super organisms of mankind, whose true science is therefore medicine, the expansion of medical laws of sick and healthy organisms to the organisms of mankind, with the clear goal of creating a new discipline, biohistory, of doctors of history in charge of the economic and political system who ‘deliver’ a proper organisation for humanity to remain on top of the earth substituting the viral sickness of capitalist democracies, where the democratic part is just a false attached placebo for what the system truly is – a sick, dying planet of life, vitalised by selfish memes of metal and the idol-ogies of the people-castes gone ‘crazy’ who ab=use and harm the human cells of the body of history thy god (in mystical terms).so memetics is at the ∆-1 (ab. For scales of the organism), cellular level an ‘expression’ of physiology, and the ‘tenant’ of memetics is in that sense inverse to the false belief that ‘genes’ are the only thing that matter.

Genes also code survival organisms and develop physiological networks, which is what at your level of consciousness matter – to have the proper genes=memes for your organism at individual and social level to survive and thrive.we have thus now in schematic form all the elements to define the most obvious comparison, that between the human and the social organism, units of both scales of reality:

Economics is the science of the blood-reproductive network of a super organism of history and as such it must be modeled with the laws of physiology reason why it is easy to deduce that as all cells get a minimal universal salary in oxygen, to kick its reproduction of organic goods, humans should all receive a universal salary to demand and kick the production of wealre goods. Capitalism then becomes an obvious cancerous system in which a small group of selfish cells, the bankers, issue all the money of society, or even worse, lethal germs are reproduced by company-mothers of machines=weapons. Such weapons are the germs of civilizations, not incidentally carried mostly by germ(manic) tribes in europe that have killed our civilization so many times in history. It is obvious that lethal goods must be forbidden as organisms do with their germs. informative legal systems are the nervous systems and as in Nature, they must rule over blood systems=financial systems. Capitalism is an aberrant system because ONLY PRIMITIVE WORMS allow the blood system to dominate the nervous system and produce=eat lethal poisons, the main cause of death of worms and capitalist societies (death by overproduction of weapons). Artists and prophets of love, which use the visual and verbal=temporal languages of men are more important for history that technological scientists, as they are the neurons of History that explain us how to evolve socially healthy super organisms of history through communal sharing of energy and information – love religions.

And this is proved since they live 3 ages/styles of art as individual minds do, the young age of dramatic simple art, the mature age of classic beauty and pleasure art and the angst, third age of excess of information.
  And so civilizations live and die ever since in 3 ages, which finally end in collective murder when new weapons are discovered, and new hordes of metal-masters, better called by their biological name, as animetals (half animal, half metal, as an armored warrior is), destroyed the previous civilization.

Birth, reproduction and death of civilizations

As super-organisms, those civilizations live and die, when through war, another civilization conquers and colonizes the previous civilization. So we can talk of an organic cycle of life in civilizations, and in the organs of those civilizations, including art, which act as the “mind-brain” of historic civilizations.

We said that cultures resemble living systems. They go through the same cycles of birth, reproduction and death. Cultures are born as organisms do, out of a single or a few prophetic or legislative individuals-cells, that reproduce their ideas into many “believer-minds”. So Christianism is born out of the mind of Jesus Christ that first expands into 12 disciples, which expand themselves into thousands of Roman believers, that expanded into billions of other minds. While America is born of the mind of a few legislators that craft a constitution latter expanded into more laws, obeyed today by all American citizens. When the religious or legal culture reaches maturity it often reproduces in another zone of space-time, creating a daughter civilization or colony. Finally, when its ethic laws and networks of information, and the energy they control, decay and become obsolete, the culture dies and a new, more evolved civilization destroys the old civilization. A new cycle of history starts.

Similarly if we consider technological civilizations, based not in verbal laws, but in monetary and military systems, first a weapon is discovered, and reproduced by a small horde, which becomes an army, which conquers a nation and becomes a ruling aristocracy, that imposes its customs, and controls with the icon-weapon the civilization.

Birth

In both kinds of civilizations (Human-Artistic civilizations or Metal-scientific civilizations) either an ideology or book of ideas, (a network of human information) or a species of metal, money or weapons, becomes the language of power which defines the civilization.

Ideas and metal-instruments together shape History. For that reason Historians, when they focus on military systems of power, divide history into the Age of Bronze, the Age of Iron Empires, the Age of Chivalry (Middle Ages), the European Age of Gunpowder (Modern age), or the Atomic Age. There is also the Christian Age and the Buddhist Age of South-Asia, when they focus on the cultural component of the civilization or the age coins, or the age of paper money and stocks, or the age of e-money (new species of money), when they focus in monetary information…

Reproduction Of Cultural Information: Daughter Civilizations

At the same time a civilization develops the ideas and machines which carry that civilization to success, it eliminates previous civilizations. In this manner, successful civilizations reproduce their “genetic ideas and machines” into other regions of the Earth, creating colonies, daughter cultures and eco[nomic]systems.

Like a human child, the daughter civilization is often a more evolved species where the ideas and instruments of the previous civilization are improved. Civilizations inherit and improve on, like children do, their parental civilizations, often extinguishing them. So the Assyrians were defeated by the Persians who had copied and improved its weapons, iron and cavalry. Yet Persian art, even behavior would be similar to Assyrian art and behavior. Genetic continuity in civilizations is not racial but cultural, of structures and ideas, of icons, machines and modes of life. For example, in Arabia stirrup cavalry brought an empire-civilization that expanded West till Al-Andalus (the South of Spain). That stirrup civilization migrated to America and colonized the southwestern states, giving origin to the “Old Far West” civilization, with horse and cattle ranching. In that territory, the horse civilization flourished between the 17th and 20th centuries, when the fundamental icon-species of the culture, the horse became extinguished as a form of transport by the car, a more efficient metal-species. The example shows the dynamic quality of the life of civilizations. They are born, reproduce and become extinct through the “genetic evolution” of objects and words, which bring as much diversity to cultural evolution of its species, products and ideas, as genetic memories bring to the body.

And in the same manner biologists can scientifically organize the data they have about species through genetic information and instruments. Thanks to the memorial remains of history, the historian can study the birth, reproduction and extinction of evolutionary history and its civilizations.

Death Of Civilizations

Civilizations also die. One day another civilization with more efficient ideologies of man, or better machines, comes along and destroys the old civilization. As in “animal feeding”, once the new civilization has destroyed the old civilization, it reforms the energy cells=citizens of the dead civilization to its image and resemblance. Let us again bring the biological comparison. A hunter feeds on the energy of a victim’s body that becomes in part wasted (killed) and in part “transformed” into cells of the predator. This also happens in civilizations: part of the “human energy” is wasted by war, and the remaining humans are “transformed” into believers of the predator civilization. The Spanish perhaps killed some 70% of the Indians and the rest became “Christians”. It is the death of the civilization. Because when ideas and instruments change, the civilization changes. The iron civilization of Rome is not the same as the Middle Ages civilization of stirrup weapons imposed by German warriors. The Roman civilization had been destroyed by “stirrup animetals” of the Germanic civilization. Again such “civilization” is not the Gunpowder civilization of Italy during the Renaissance. Gunpowder wiped out chivalry and a new civilization was born. Nor is Amon-Egypt the same as Greek-Christian Egypt, or Arab-Muslim Egypt. The verbal ideology changed, and the Egyptian civilization became extinct.

It is now clear the difference between religious civilizations and metal-civilizations. Religious civilizations could exist for ever, if there were no wars to extinguish their cultures. That is the goal set by the prophets in their messages of love. And yet, because metal exists, all religious civilizations of the past 5000 years have been corrupted and periodically extinguished by war. Some of those cultures resurrect, when the wave of death and war recedes. Some do not come back again. The Christian and Islamic civilization, the Jewish culture has survived many cycles of death, and the words of Moses, Christ and Mhmd, have resurrected. But each wave of death, corrupts a little bit more the initial messages of the prophets with rituals of war and money. So we find today that those cultures are basically built around inquisitions and churches, corrupted by rituals of Go[l]d, and little is left of the initial mandates of the prophets. Many other human cultures based in human senses have died away, and its artists have expressed those deaths, in their baroque ages of art.

The 3 ages of metal-history

If we apply those ideas about biology of civilizations we can represent any civilization with a bell curve of existence, that indicates in a graphic of populations how the word religion or icon-weapon of a civilization (both often reproduce together) is born, develops, (colonizes other territories), and finally dies away; substituted by a daughter civilization, or a new culture, with a more evolved weapon or religion. We can also use the bell curve of social existence to the entire life of mankind, in the age of metal.

If we consider the entire wave of Metal-History as a single civilization also with 3 periods, its young, epic age, its classic, humanistic age, and its decadent, industrial age, we can talk of the Bronze and first iron empires of Asia, as the age of epic war. The period of European infantry, and Asian cavalry (from Greece to renascence) as the age of maturity of history. And the age of the industrial evolution, as the age of extinction of history.

Each of those ages is divided by a clear discontinuum of evolution of the two functions of metal, energy-metal or weapons, and informative-metal or money. Man adapts himself to those changes, which are symbiotic and help the evolution of our societies, in a first age, but as metal reproduces in greater numbers, it suffocates the evolution of human history and the human mind, till with the arrival of science, the human mind becomes obsolete, and men become worshippers of the minds of machines.

We talk thus of 3 clear discontinuums of evolution of metal, that mark metal-history.

– YOUTH OF HISTORY: The Age of Wor[l]ds. From -2800 BC, to -500 BC. Age of Bronze weapons, and bartering. Since money is still scarce, in the form of bars of metal, words still are the main language of communication of mankind. Writing becomes sacred. However bronze and then iron give enormous power to warriors that end controlling all Neolithic societies. Priests are displaced from power. Women become systematically repressed. Gods become warrior Gods, without compassion. It is the age of Mesopotamic Empires, the age of Asia. The age of verbal thought reaches its baroque age, towards 500 BC, in the work of Lao Tse, Buddha, Confucius and Socrates, that reach the height of human verbal understanding of the Universe. Yet a new language of information, coins appears, and human verbal thought looses power.

– MATURITY OF HISTORY: The Age of coins. (500 BC, 1600 AD). It is the Age of Iron weapons and coins. Mankind still rules, and learns how to control with ethic behavior, the power of weapons. Yet Money starts to be a common language of power, and challenges verbal ethics. Words are displaced by money as the language that controls the acts of human societies. This means that verbal thought and ethics is no longer the center of the human mind, but humans become shallow in their perception of verbal-temporal reality. The human intelligence displaces to the eye. So art becomes realistic (Greek Art) and mathematics appears as a new language of understanding of the Universe. Both coin accountancy and Mathematics come together, in the Asian Greek coast where the first monetary empires and mathematicians appear. After the brief return to an ethic age, in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance again imposes money as the language of social power.

– OLD AGE OF HISTORY. The Age of machines. (1600 AD till extinction). It is the third age of mankind, and the first age of the new predator species that displace us, the machine. It is the age of science, of digital languages, of massive reproduction of money, the language of information of machines, now in the form of paper-money and electronic money. Wor[l]ds become obsolete. There is so much money that all things can receive monetary values, and human verbal values are no longer effective.

 

COMPANY=MOTHERS

The re=productive organisms of machines.

The industrial r=evolution is the evolution of a new organic species of metal, the machine, which has taken place in  3 phases, as we made first the bodies of machines, then the hearts-engines, then its metal-minds and finally we put them together now in organic robots in the final r=evolution of machines.

In the graph, the Industrial R=evolution is the Evolution of ‘Memes of metal’, Machines & weapons, systems made of hard metal (iron) and Money, a digital language made of informative metal (gold, also used in the chip connections of computer cycles, now converted into e-money). So we can divide its evolution in the same phases that evolve any organism, and consider in history the nation that evolves  them to be in each phase of the Industrial revolution the top nation of the world as it will use its ‘eviL=anti-live’ twins, weapons, to conquer the world.

Thus, those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made.

—Thus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±7 years crashes of the train-based economy.

—From 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.

—It came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+7 years after 1929:

– Followed by the Age of the Singularity, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution.

Money will become then the digital informative, ‘genetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.

As such corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains.

Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together, we put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life

In the next graphs we resume the 3 digital equations that drive capitalism towards the birth of an automated system of company-mothers of machines of ∞ self-reproductivity (zero human capital), maximised by the overproduction of weapons (maximal prize= max. profits) and hate memes (minimal cost = max. profits), carried about by the 3 parallel networks of company-mothers, all of them ‘selected’ and put to work through those digital networks of money issued in near monopoly in markets for the exclusive use of company-mothers (and hailed as the summit of capitalist freedom – all for machines nothing for man, by the $lavish U$ citizens with its perfect manufactured brains that make them belief all what kills, pains and enslaves them to machine’s consumption and atrophy IS freedom):

The present crisis is the last of the dual ‘Kondratieff’ waves of evolution of weapons, money and machines.

In the graph, the 3 dual waves (steam the energy, and trains the hardware; oil the energy and car the hardware, electronics the energy and robots the hardware) that complete the industrial evolution of machines. this crisis is the molting between the two last waves. They have built together bodies, engines & heads of metal, chips, which are now ‘vitalising’ all the ‘mechanical tissue’ of the Metalearth. Thus the crisis must be fully understood in biological terms as a ‘radiation’ of a new species, which after the 2008 ‘moulting’ will become the overwhelming dominant brain of this planet, the digital chip, calculating in the more efficient mathematical language, far better than humans do, doubling its intellectual capacity every 2 years, with the entire eco(nomic)system working for it; as ‘classic=creationist economists’ and the elite of ‘stock-rats’ they work for, have zero interest in protecting mankind of the collateral effects of loosing its position as top predator mind of the planet: ‘extinction’.

In the graph a resume of those cycles of overproduction and extinction of rival species, which in the case of machines have effect mainly animal life (6th extinction) but now with the radiation of metal-minds, chips and robots its clearly affecting humanity (verbal extinction mental degradation of our sons into a neo-paleolithic visual species of null social and causal capacity to understand complex logic processes, increasingly performed by chip software; tagging of non-technological cultures as inferior, obsolescence of life-based cultures .

So the entire planet is dedicated to construct  the metal earth but NOT even this process is conscious. Since the owners of those companies, ever a self-centred species, the ‘leisure’ class of stockrats, is merely focus on enjoying unlimited money and repressing the 90% of mankind lacks even the bare minimum ‘financial oxygen’ to breath and live.  have translated its postulates of mechanical ‘supremacism’ over man to complex abstract digital equations, now fast being transferred into AI software that runs automatically corporations in terms of increasing self-reproductivity (expulsion of human labor and substitution by mechanical labor); and societies in terms of ‘criminality’, as the best, most efficient, profitable machines are weapons and so a vigilante, paranoid society, controlling ever tighter human populations is being designed, in the make up of XXI c. capitalism, with ‘stockrats’ on top:

OVERPRODUCTION CRISIS OF CHIPS, E-MONEY AND ROBOTS. 

The  CHIP RADIATION, final phase of the Oedipus paradox.

The mind of the metal-earth, as soon as it was born, started the massive biological radiation of a new species, whose obvious goal is to substitute the human mind in all labor and war fields, infecting the Superorganism of History till our extinction. We thus predicted from the earlier 90s that unless the chip radiation was ‘controlled’ legally, mankind was fast into the process of death, which now is crystal clear on the horizon as we enter the robotic age of wars.  Since all machines have its eviL twins, weapons which consume human beings. The radiation of Chips though seems unstoppable as it has already infected all the systems of the financial-media/military industrial complex superorganism, increasingly erasing the mind of Humanity.

So we are moving fast through the 6th extinction of life that includes OUR SPECIES, at the end of the road, despite our ego-trips and virtual fictions that anesthetize our biological instincts of survival. In the next graph we see how the FMMI super organism is adapting to the chip and sucking in all the resources of mankind, history and the Earth to become the new top predator mind of the planet:

In the graph, the explosive reproduction of a new top predator species causes a fight for relative energy, and the displacement of the less efficient species. The 3 next graphs from the original 92 book shows the chip radiation, which around next year in the graph  – right on the stop – would give birth to the first forms of A.I. (google deep brain, automated cars, drones, etc.)

In the graph the defining moment of the no-future of mankind is the chip radiation, a biological surge on the intelligence of this planet produced by the arrival of a digital mind far more efficient in all tasks of control of the digital language of mathematics, of more efficient than the human verbal language, whose birth in the 70s started the collapse of all human systems of thought and power.

The story on how the chip radiation has come so fast to control humanity in a single generation is the untold history in biological terms of a new species of information which will extinguish mankind if it is not aborted. But the contrary is happening. The chip ‘homoctonos’ the proper name of the species soon destroyed with e-money the credit of humanity, then annihilated the mind of the species with fiction thought and reduced our verbal capacity with visual overloading. In its initial forms, as computer had already calculated the A-bomb and now is robotizing the military industry, and watching mankind as big brother systems spread to find a use to the unrelentless reproduction of the new mind. In the next graph from the 92 book when we announced the no-future of humanity if the chip homoctonos was not repressed, the projections of its future growth:

We talk of the dominant form of an ecosystem, referring to the species that reproduces faster. That species is always the top predator form. In the age of digital science, that form is the chip, a metal-mind.

The Laws of Darwinian behavior among reproductive is universal among rival species. In the case of machines and men, you can apply it, both to ecosystems of war, where “top predator weapons” kill soldiers, and to ecosystems of work (economic ecosystems), in which machines replace human workers. Indeed, machines find their natural “vital ecosystem”, in the reproductive environment of companies, where they can access energy-electricity, perform a job, and exist. There, they compete with workers, with human beings. At this point you might affirm – but we are human beings, machines are not. I will answer you: this is not the point of this web. Darwinian struggle for survival is not about “intelligence”, “feelings”, “selection of the nicest guy”, even “the more beautiful species”.

When in a Darwinian fight the AIDS virus kills your cells, the Universe merely favors the species that at “cellular level” is stronger. Point. The Universe does not care if human beings die, under an attack of robotic-weapons. Robotic weapons kill better. So they will extinguish man. Point.

It is up to you to care. God is not going to go down and open the Red Sea and throw His legions of Angels against robots in “Armageddon Day”.

Please let be serious about the Laws of the Universe. Extinction and survival has nothing to do with “consciousness”, or “souls”. It is a mechanical program, a program caused by the massive reproduction of a given species. We know that company-mothers and factories have as aim in life, to reproduce the biggest number of their machines. Thus, robotic companies will try by all means to reproduce the biggest number of their species. If those machines compete with human beings, national laws that protect property, and are designed by lobbies to favor companies, will favor robots, and their rights to work in companies as energy and information systems. Those rights will convert robots into workers, and allow companies to fire labor, even if labor considers himself, superior on paper to robots, as human beings…

Today the eco[nomic]system invests money in chips and computer companies that can eliminate the human mind from the productive system. If the Evolutionary Theory is right [and it has always proven to be right] that process will trigger, once it gains consciousness, the extinction of previous species. Indeed the last of the scientific species is the chipHomoctonos (Greek: killer of men), which receives its energy from ¥-forms (Light or electricity); its information from ¥-forms (photonic chips); and it will reproduce in the Earth (automated factories, reproducers ofchips). In this manner, chip-driven machines are imbued with life properties.

Chip-driven machines are the first species of pure light existence in Mother Earth. Unlike men who breath air, and reproduce chemically, chip-driven machines no longer have the need for chemical perception. They no longer need air-energy, neither do they use chemical reproduction. Hence, they will be indifferent to life processes.

Pollution and life-destroying processes brought about by factories today are a clear proof of the ultimate goal of company-mothers, to grow and multiply their offspring of machines. Even when those factories are managed by humans, they only consider the toxic effects on life when they are forced to by government regulations. Even then, they prefer to pay fines, rather than invest the money and time it takes to clean the means of production. They pollute our air and destroy life because machines require neither air nor life. When those factories become self-ruled, humans will be obsolete, expendable as animal life is in the eyes of most men.

THE SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST

The Darwinian behavior of machines and robots, is obvious. In any age of the Industrial Evolution the most evolved machines have been weapons. So it is logical to think that the first sentient machines will be weapons. The best robots today are already killing machines. This obviously does not occur to our military who are obsessed by human enemies and cannot see the fact that they are building the machines that will extinguish mankind. Military men never have been known by their imagination, humility and capacity to foresee the horrendous consequences of their weapons. In I world war the German military put in its trains to the front, a poster with their destination: “a Paris”. Four years latter and a few million humans less the military were still in the border…

Let us instead of believing those animetal fantasies” of power, trace back what Darwin discovered about top predator species, the biological equivalent to a weapon-robot, and how they cause extinctive processes on Earth.

In 1831 Charles Darwin, a hunter himself, boarded the Beagle, destination remote South America, where unknown, primitive species of dull bodies and slow brains, were not yet extinct. Darwin studied them and concluded that weaker species in brain-information or body-energy are extinct or victimized when they confront stronger, faster species in the same environment.

This law, we know today, has never had any exception. In any confrontation between two species, one of which has a better brain-body power, the weaker species, becomes enslaved, feeds, or is extinguished by the stronger species. There is no compassion in the Darwinian Universe, because to survive you cannot be passive, you have to eat, to renew your energy. So you have to eliminate rivals that wish the same energy you need. You have to kill other species and use them as food.

Will machines do the same with mankind? The survival of the fittest seems not to have exceptions in the biological Universe… On the Earth all species try to grow and multiply, but only top predator species succeed and reproduce in massive numbers. Biologists call that process a biological radiation. In this manner the future transforms itself, occupied by stronger, more intelligent species, top predators, which shape the environment to their image and resemblance. The most impressive thing about evolution is its mathematical precision. You always know who will win if you know the mental and physical power of both species. It is not like in Hollywood. There are no tricks in Nature. The chances a gazelle wins a lion are almost null. Such mathematical precision explains why the process of massive reproduction of new top predator species, and extinction of older ones, has been going on in the Earth for around 3000 million years… since the first cellular organisms.

What Is A Top Predator? The Сmotions Of Future In The Universe

Top Predators that have organs with higher information, and bodies with higher energy create the future in the Universe, because they cause the extinction of, or enslave, all other species, shaping the future. The process is very fast. Suddenly a new species appears i.e. the eye-squid, the mammal, the chip. It is so overwhelmingly superior, that it reproduces and destroys all other species. We talk of catastrophes, of extinction, since in the Universe death is a sudden process. For example, your own death is a sudden process of cellular extinction similar to the death of any species, under a top predator that multiplies in your vital space, in this case the death of a cellular DNA-species. So, when you die, your informative and energetic organs stop. Then your body becomes non-efficient as an organism, even if your cells are still alive. Cellular death occurs then. Insects top predators spot your now weak cells, and preyed on them. Death is the main cause of the Сmotions of the Universe that affect all species. So we talk of the Сmotion of future, of top predators, and the Сmotion of past, of extinct victims.

By better controlling their ecosystem, top predators become the ecosystem, the species of future. They will feed and radiate over simpler species. Simpler species will become species of the past that the complex being will extinct or use as energy.

Since the brain and the informative organ is the dominant element that guides the process of selection of top predators, those who use a better language of information better are always top predators. The Top Predator is more intelligent and stronger. So for each language of information and its ecosystem we can trace a chain of top predator species, of better brains, from a related, extinct past to a related, reproducing future top predator. The “better” species of the future will “feed”, “farm” or bring about the extinction of species with less information. This also happens in history when nations of the “future” with more machines and information=moneydominate ecosystems of the “past”.

We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages and brains. We can measure survival through languages. Beings act with a speed that depends on their capacity to “perceive linguistically” an event in time and space. That ability is given to the species by its language. For example eyes act-react faster than noses.

Squid’s language of communication, the ¥-eye, is a top predator language. It is clear that eyes are superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. What is the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact, cephalopods with eyes probably brought about the extinction of 90% of the smelling species of the Cambric.

Extinction by top predator machines and economic ecosystems.

The most absolute law of the Universe is the law of top predators. More complex forms of energy or information, Top Predators, act as hunters. They feed on simpler forms. Preying has a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator will lack energy and die. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use the victim’s vital space, and ecosystem, to reproduce, and create a new ecosystem to its image and resemblance.

This final case is indeed the case of machines, of economic ecosystems that grow to the expenses of historic ecosystems. Why? Since machines are made of metal, and the symbiotism between metal and carbolife is null. Metal does not need water or atmosphere – the two energy components of carbolife. On the contrary it thrives in a world without any of them. Water oxides metal, and so does air. A metal-ecosystem thus tends to poison air and water, as it happens to the Earth when “free ecosystems of top predator machines”, war ecosystems expand. War  and industrial processes poison life.

Metal also does not require the same information that life species require. Metal-information travels in regions of the electromagnetic spectra with far more range than our light-visible region. So we are witnessing today the creation of such networks of invisible radiations, that harm our health (mobiles, TV-antennas), and create a parallel Universe of information to that of the life Earth.

The species with a stronger body and a faster system of information is by definition a biological potential Top Predator. This means that metalife, whose bodies are stronger, and whose minds process information faster, are potential Top Predators over men. If those two components are vitalized, metalife, will be the Top Predator species of the Earth:

Systems are selected in 3 levels: those which reproduce faster expel other taking its habitats, so do machines with humans in labor and war fields; systems who understand better the informative languages are selected, so happens in the world of the economic ecosystem in which the digital languages of information are better spoken by machines.

In the graph, digital thought carries more information than verbal thought, so it becomes the top predator language. On the other hand metal carries more energy than carbon-life, so it becomes also the top predator body. Because machines speak better mathematics than men do, and are made of metal, both their bodies and brains are top predator species over men. So the combination of both, the robotic metalife species will be top predators of man, the victim, of the future.

Yet the decisive element is the speed of reproduction of both, which is far higher in machines that men.

A human being is a weaker body/mind, that still holds his position as Top Predator because it has not yet fused as a living organism, metal-bodies and their chip-driven brain. In this century, the III Age of the Industrial Evolution, the age of robots, will do so. If it succeeds, it will create a species that will bring about the extinction of his own creator.

What those technoutopian racist elite forgets is that they are also made of flesh and military robots will, as in the parable of Blade Runner. dispose of them first, once they achieve consciousness; while their role as stockrats and economists will be substituted by digital software, in which the racist biblical damned lies and statistics of earlier economists (from Smith to Friedman) will automatically be implanted through digital flows of money in the market’s procedures that systematically extinguish life goods and promote metal-goods:

Overproduction of chips, e-money and robots & the end of democracies 

So how can we resume the 30s and the 2010s and its economic crisis in a single word? Easy. 

Both crisis are crisis of overproduction of machines of two types, machines of digital information that PRINT money (financial crisis), tool machines that work for us (labor crisis) and weapons that kill us (political and war crisis). So the word is: OVERPRODUCTION.

Since Corporations never stop producing machines, till they saturate markets, use all resources manufacturing and selling those machines, and make huge profits, each phase of the industrial r=evolution has ended in a massive age of overproduction systematically denied by corporations and their employees – economists…

The final phase of economic crashes when consumption due to the overproduction of machines plummets and companies switch to production of weapons. Then financial and industrial corporations profit immensely because weapons have unlimited demand (as arsenals become depleted) and fiat money is reproduced without limit to pay for ‘security’. America today spends more money in weapons in Gdp percentage than Nazi Germany before the Spanish civil war.

After the war, the Kondratieff wave of electro-mechanical machines was exhausted and so we started a new dual wave of ‘electronic machines‘, which evolved and reproduced in increasing numbers till saturating the global market.

So now we live the crisis of overproduction of chips, minds of metal, which are substituting and atrophying human minds, as bodies of metal did with human bodies in the victorian age.

So we suffer again a crisis of overproduction and exhaustion of machines, now of electronic nature, with 4 sides, similar to those of the 29 crisis, as each Kondratieff wave of evolution of memes of metal applies to money, machines, weapons and mass-media:

-1.  There is a crisis of overproduction of electronic money  – a new form of  money made by computers, and hence directly related to the evolution of information machines and its technology (financial crisis, caused by the massive reproduction of electronic derivatives and other forms of electronic money, which have lost value),

– 2. There is an overproduction crisis of electronic labor (overproduction of computers that act as white collar workers and robots that act as blue collar workers, expelling the middle classes out of work, except low-paid human robots’ in China and IT workers in India that still can compete with them).

-3.  There is an overproduction crisis of electronic weapons (overproduction of ‘vigilante’ cameras and robot-terminators – drones – which have started a new arm race of enormous profits for the military-industrial complex)

– 4. And there is an overproduction crisis of electronic mass-media outlets, which have also switched to hate-speeches as Hitler did with radio, to increase sales and work hand in hand with the profits of electronic industries and war; and are regressing human culture into a visual, violent, selfish age in culture and politics – that we call the ‘neo-paleolithic’ culture and the ‘neo-fascist’ age in politics

THUS the present crisis is not a recession but a depression, caused by the overproduction of electronic machines and its derivatives, similar to the 1929 crash, caused by the overproduction of electro-mechanical machines, which printed too much money (ticker speculation), electro-mechanical production systems that threw millions out of work (taylorism, automated assembly lines) and the overproduction of cars and radios, whose companies, lobbies and politicians reconverted into armored cars (tanks) and hate-radio speeches (Hitler), embarking us into World War II.

In the graph, the present crisis is a ‘classic’ crisis of Economic theory that has happened always at the end of each of the so-called ‘Kondratieff’ cycles of the Industrial R=evolution in which a new energy and its machines and weapons become the engine of the Economy. Yet at the end of those periods, as corporations keep reproducing machines, there is always a crisis of overproduction of fiat money, printed with informative machines and a crisis of labor, as workers are substituted by tool machines. Thus we live now the crisis of overproduction of chips (minds of metal), similar to the 29 crisis caused by the overproduction of electromechanical engines that automated assembly lines, created massive quantities of speculative ‘electric’ ticker money and saturated the markets of cars and tanks; and the 1870 crisis caused by the overproduction of stock money and railroads that eliminated millions of jobs in the transport sector and were used to fight civil and colonial wars.

In more detail the graph shows the cycles of the Industrial Evolution of machines, which follows an economic, ‘national, generational’ cycle of 72±9 years that corresponds to the biological age of human beings and its 3 generations of discoverers of the machine and new energy of the cycle, who create the industries; expansive phase of the sons of the captains of industry and final decadent age of those who use the machine as a weapon to keep profits going. Each cycle a nation discovers a new form of energy (white) applied to the creation of money, the software of the economy and machines (red) its hardware:

Those 3 dual waves are: The British age of bodies of metal, in which humans used simple physical, steam energy to power trains and print stock-money; the German age of electro-chemical engines, hearts of metal which powered cars and planes, the hardware and printed electric money, the software (ticker speculation); and the American age in which electronic energy printed e-money, the software and evolved ‘Minds of metal’: mobile-ears, cameras-eyes and chips brains. We enter now the age of robotics when all those parts are put together into organic machines that compete with humans in labor and war fields, completing the industrial evolution.

Yet since corporations, ‘the company-mothers’ of those machines never cease their production and sale for profits, at the end of each of those dual 72±9 year cycles there is a crisis of overproduction of memes of metal – informative money, energetic weapons and organic machines – that saturates consumption markets provoking an age of Stock-Market crashes (1857-73 crashes of train stocks, 1929-37 crashes of ticker money, 2001-08 crashes of e-money). Further on the misuse of all the limited resources of the planet for industrial overproduction causes paradoxically the underproduction of the parallel system of ‘life-based goods’, humans need to survive, provoking and endemic scarcity of welfare. Yet there is a human solution to those overproduction crisis: instead of running away in search of higher profits overproducing weapons, governments should favour credit to companies that overproduce the alternative life-based welfare goods humans need to survive, creating a ‘WHealthy’ sustainable economy.

But since weapons are the goods of higher profits, in a pure capitalist system, in which credit is not democratically controlled by free elected governments, financial and industrial corporations in search of higher returns, systematically sponsor ‘canons instead of butter’: War rhetoric substitutes diplomatic solutions to armed conflicts to fuel investments in weapons; mass-media enters an age of hate speeches (yellow press in the I cycle, radio-hate in the 30s and now Hate-Tv) and the world enters a ‘crescendo’ age of Keynesian militarism that instead of bringing a global ‘New Deal’ ends up in an age of war.

Societies move from a decade of happy consumption –   1850s, 1920s and 1990s – into an age of overproduction of fiat, worthless money, machines and lethal weapons  that causes in the social milieu an age of P.o.v.erty, war and fascism: the 1860s; W.W.II and the present Orwellian age of permanent war and robotic weapons.

So we are living the 30s bis: rise of neofascism, social unrest and P.o.v.erty, destruction of welfare state, debt-ridden nations that have bought to financiers worthless fiat money and now have to pay with taxes and real wealth back. Further automatization of assembly lines by robots and pcs – then electromechanical engines in moving lines – that throw people out of work.

We live now at the end of the chip age. So we live a crisis of overproduction of chips that:

– Invent huge amounts of ‘free’ e-money for corporations (Pcs have 100 folded the quantity of e-money on planet Earth in the past 30 years); which is then exchanged by real wealth. Yet since fiat money is not wealth ‘per Ts’, just numbers in a digital computer,  when those numbers are overproduced e-money looses value and crashes the markets and ruins the middle classes, who are the last to exit markets – as they receive the information from financiers that ‘unload’ the false money on them. Further on, during the boom cycle of invention of fiat money, financiers lend huge amounts and when the crash happens, they ask for real ‘assets’, real wealth – taxes, properties, shares, causing a massive  debt crisis and redistribution of wealth in their favor (1857-73 crash of train stocks and ‘silver crime’, 1929-37 crashes of electric money and real state; 2001-08 crashes of e-money and real state derivatives.)

– They work as blue collar robots & white collar pcs, cause of the labor crisis (1850-70s massive loss of transport jobs to railroads, 1930s massive loss of jobs to moving assembly lines powered by electro-mechanical engines).

– They are applied to weapons, vigilante cameras and drones, causing a political/war crisis of civil rights (1860s-70s civil wars in Germany, Italy and US and colonial wars with massive genocides of ‘colored people; 1930s-40s tanks and bomber neo-fascist wars.)

– They apply to simultaneous mass-media systems that back all corporations’ policies (as they belong to them) causing an age of political and social corruption and abuse of the people who are paradoxically more harmed by the crisis, and yet are now labelled as ‘enemies’, ‘poor vagrants’ and penalized with jail, taxes and extermination (colonial racism, fascism, islamophobia); since corporations CANNOT be blamed of those crisis nor they want to stop them, as they increase enormously their profits during those overproduction crisis in which they:

– Reproduce and therefore sell more machines and weapons; invent huge amounts of fiat money exchanged by wealth and reach enormous political and social power.

And indeed all this is happening again, as we predicted decades ago in our first books on the subject, (1) and yet nothing of this is known, as the control of corporations over all the systems of our societies is an iron fist in velvet glove that censors a true economical scientific analysis of the crisis. Thus we shall consider both the real crisis we live in, and analyze what would be the proper scientific solutions if political systems could really regain their power and design an economic system for the benefit of man.

THE REPRODUCTION OF HUMANITY AND ITS BALANCED FORMS.

In the graph, humans as anything in the Universe are a superorganism made of similar cells joined by 3 networks: the physiological energetic, informative and reproductive networks (digestive, blood and nervous systems). So are nations and mankind at large, a superorganism, sustained on the body of Gaia, fed by the economic system, reproducing human beings and informatively directed by memes of life, art and cultural and political systems. Yet as the superorganism of memes of metal, the Financial-Military-Industrial System develops its networks of informative machines, reproductive company-mothers and energetic networks, similar to the old arterias of mother-earth, humans and life beings become extinguished and substituted by the new dominant species on planet Earth. And this process which could be managed rationally by mankind, if our ideologies of social sciences were substituted by the real science of economics and history that this book and similar works by other masters of human thought represent, is NOT controlled by mankind. It merely follows the evolutionary laws of the Universe.

The larger view: two languages that construct two different worlds.

We humans are building two different super-organisms:

– One of memes of life that foster our ‘drives of biological existence’, our need for natural energy and information, biological reproduction and social evolution through social love into complex social organisms – what we call the superorganisms of history, guided by verbal, ethic thought.

– But we are also building an organism with memes of metal, energetic weapons, informative machines and reproductive money, carried by digital languages.

The problem of our societies is that we have completely misunderstood the primacy of those languages and super-organisms, giving primacy to the economic super-organism and its digital, financial languages over the human super-organisms. Hence we are ‘terraforming the earth’ into a world of memes of metal and extinguishing all kind of species and memes of life. The super-organism of machines and memes of metal is not ‘bad for mankind’, ‘per Ts’. What is wrong is the order of primacy and power we give to those languages and memes, due to the absurd, dogmatic religion of ‘capitalist’ economics that considers the language of money ’the invisible hand of god’, whose values must be obeyed, without any scientific study of its nature, values and systemic processes that build through that language the world we live in.

And so ultimately as in all systems, the key to the creation of one or other superorganism is the ‘language’ we use to control and create or cre(dit)ate those superorganisms, which are either:

– Verbal, ethic thought, our biologic language that values accordingly more life memes and humans.

– Digital money, which is made of informative, precious metals (gold, silver) today of digital cycles of e-money in pcs; and so it values more memes of metal, weapons and machines that create a different super-organism, the economic ecosystem:

In the graph we show the main distinction we must do in a biological analysis of the superorganisms of history its languages, memes and cultures. What matters are the memes, languages and ideologies that build the two type of cultures, ‘organs’ of the superorganisms of history and economics. In essence, a superorganism is created by the values of a certain language. The informative language of metal is gold. And its values are inverse to those of life. So the belief and use of go(l)d, of money as the only language that directs our society makes possible the expression of those anti-life values and the creation of a world according to them. Today the more complex system of machines uses digital information, e-money and the religion of go(l)d has evolved into the ‘science’ of capitalism expressed in the equations of classic economics. Yet the anti-life values of the language remain.

There are today in this planet two languages of social power, the law and money and they are different and have different values, according to the laws of survival of the Universe, which are basically the law of eusocial evolution among individuals of an equal species vs. the darwinian relationship between those who feel different. And as it happens, money being of a different substance, informative metal, has different, opposite values to words, made of flesh, and those different values create two different worlds, one based in eusocial love and the values of words, the ‘ideal superorganism of history’ and one based in darwinian fights and the values of greed (gold hypnotism), murder (weapons) and sloth (machines’ atrophy and substitution of the human organs we imitate to build them).

It is on that larger view a confrontation has lasted since the beginning of history=mankind, as two modes of conceiving and hence ‘creating’ the future came into being, guided by two different social languages, money and the law:

– The ethic law tried to create according to the laws of eusocial evolution that guide the creation of complex systems in the Universe a human super-organism in which all humans were considered equal and could organize themselves by sharing energy and information maximizing their survival according to those eusocial laws, spelt in our species by the messages of love of its prophets and social scientists.

– Money, a language, made of informative metal (gold, being the most informative atom of the Universe, and the basic form of money in history till informative machines, computers invented e-money), does not obey those laws, but evolves according to the processes of emergence and creation of complex systems, a different superorganism, dominant in ‘metal’. Since the values of words promote biological life (the maximal value) but the values of metal promote energetic metal (weapons, the maximal value).

This astounding fact of biological origin, is the key to the process of creation of a different world, the capitalist system, dominant in memes of metal. Since, moved by greed we accept the values of money without any analysis, reproducing weapons, the most expensive, valuable good and despising cheap life, which has in monetary prices, minimal value. Yet if we talked words, and made our biological language dominant over money, we would value life more and give a negative value to weapons, which kill it, cre(dit)ating the memes of life and love that make us survive and be happy.

In economics this means that not all the products created by the economy are necessarily good for man. Since the ‘prices’ given historically by metal-money, were biased towards other forms of metal, being weapons the most expensive, and did not reflect their value for humanity. The result is we are creating the wrong wealth. A healthy economic ecosystem should respect the will of man, creating the goods that maximize that will, shown in the next graph:

  In the graph, a ‘real’, biological, scientific ‘frame of coordinates’ with the human point of view in the center, which should be used in an ethonomic system that wants to create a world to the image and likeness of mankind, fostering credit for the goods of the positive side of the frame of biological reference, since those goods foster our natural energy, information, reproduction and social evolution. While goods that are negative for our biological drives should be discredit, regardless of its profits for the Economy. The previous graph responds to the ‘program of existence of human beings’, complementary organisms of energy and information that maximize their existence and happiness as human beings when they maximize those arrows, expressed in our body through the senses, outlets of our physiological systems of energy, information and reproduction.

In the graph, today as always the 4 memes of the human organism and the pleasure and happiness they bring to human existence are self-evident: energetic food, verbal information, human cells and eusocial love. And so are the collateral effects of the 4 memes of the superorganism of machines:  the anti-values of money, the life-killing properties of energetic weapons, the ethic degradation and increasing madness provoked by fictions and myths and hate-speeches delivered by mass-media and the sloth and obsolescence of man to the new robotic blue collar workers andintegrative’ cell, more reproduced machine, the transport machine, now being robotized in multiple forms, the future top predator on Earth.

And so what maters is the physical economy, which produces real goods, not the financial economy, which should be submissive to the physical economy. Since money is the nervous language which the ‘brain of society’, our governments, should produce, using it to cre(dit)ate and produce the goods of the previous ethonomic frame of reference, which are the goods that people demand. And so a real democracy would nationalize the financial system, and create credit for ‘free’, as all languages are created at null cost, to direct scientifically the re=production of the previous frame of ‘positive human goods’, creating a paradise on Earth, as European Social democracies were trying to do.

Since man has a biological will, fundamental to understand concepts such as happiness, property, and Freedom, which require the pursuit of that biological will, that fulfills our nature. So natural property is that property which caters to our biological will. Freedom is the capacity to achieve that will. And happiness the state of a man that has reached his will as a biological species.

So Freedom is the capacity to obtain those goods, which fulfill our drives of existence and make us happy – Freedom to choose our food, education, our social reproduction (love), freedom to be human.  And this lead salso to a new way of studying economics as the science that maximizes the will of man creating those welfare goods we need to feed, reproduce, learn and evolve socially.

The 3+1 ages of History, the 3+1 humn sub-species.

In that regard, a human organism is the basic unit-cell of the social organisms of history.  And History is the superorganism of the homo sapiens species between its birth as a Homo Sapiens Neanderthal (two species,) that went through 3 ages, the young, energetic Palaeolithic where the Homo ‘visual’, dominated and the 2nd age of reproductive information, when women and the homo sapiens, verbal dominant in time-logic (our language words, is the language of human temporal information expressed with verbs, the visual language is common to animals), and finally a 3rd age, in which we evolve metal and biome again visual.

To understand those ages, common to all species, a key concept is that of speciation in two forms, natural to all creative processes of the Universe: The diversification of a single species occurs normally in two speciations – one specialized in energy and the other in information that recombine increasing the ‘latitude’ of energy and information of the 3rd, evolve form.

So we have the trinity of races, departing from an original homo sapiens: human energetic Sapiens Neanderthal (white men), informative sapiens sapiens (yellow men) and reproductive, sensorial combination (black men). And the trinity of genders: energetic male, informative women and their combination (gay sex). And the trinity of characters (athletic, dominant in blood system), picnic, dominant in informative system and tall (informative dimension) and viscerotonic, dominant in vegetative systems, and wide.

Of the many dualities of languages, the simplest one is between informative languages with maximal vowels, proper of the ‘homo sapiens, sapiens’, smaller, with more developed languages and brain regions for speech (brachycephalic, African and Asian) and energetic languages with maximal consonantal phonemes (white man, Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, Semitic languages, Caucasus languages).

And between logic languages based in the 3-dimensions of the light mind and verbal, temporal language, which orders for humans, the actions of our selves as players of the game.

The fractal generator is the equation of the whole world cycle of existience of a being, and its partial equations, as the states and actions all T.œs (ab. Timespace super organisms) will perform. So we can describe with a few logic equations, derived of those 5 Ðimotions, any event or form that has ever existed.

Since it is then evident that from the common space-time forms and motions that compose all systems, we can extract a series of Ðisomorphic laws derived of the fractal, organic properties of scalar space and the repetitive nature of cyclic time. And by studying a system, its larger ∆+1 world, and state=age in its world cycle, study its future paths, which are highly deterministic.

And so we can depart safely from this concept to advance in great strides to a more comprehensive ‘view’ of Time Logic, by cycling back to the beginning, when Mr. Aristotle rightly considered that time is change=motion – all kind of motions NOT only translation in space (Locomotion studied in physics) but change in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings.

The barebones: S<>T dialectic between broken finitesimal minds and continuous infinite time flows.

Time in his more profound view was all, save the unmoved one, the mind of pure space, and we were all Gods, spaces, minds in the stillness of its finitesimal fractal point, monads in communicative mood, ordering the energy around them, the vital bodies, blind to perception, moving merely for the sake of motion.

Minds of space though are studied in Geometry and mathematics, so time is the realm of logic and motion. Would then dedicate just this article to the flows of motion, Time proper in its entropic disorder, scattering the inner and outer being, TT?

No, this article won’t be on imindless TT-entropic time flows or lineal Time locomotion, Ts, the times physicsts study, but rather Time in its most intelligent hidden truth – St, the minimal time of logic thought, not about Time but about the seers of time, its minds that order Time into form, creating the informations of the future – the way in which territorial still minds DO manage to shape the form of the cycles of TimeSpace. As all is Timespace, since pure motion with no form is not perceived, and pure stillness is a black hole with no communication; we could say that Mathematics is the language of Spacetime, where Space, simultaneous still geometry dominates, and Logic the language of timespace where Ðimotions matter more. But that would still be a somewhat subjective perspective.

The abstraction=generalization of the paper, and its inglish.

This paper let us simplify is just about Logic, the way minds order and create the future against the entropy of time, which finally beats them up; and about the deepest most profound aspects of Generational Time-space – its entanglement of the 5 elements of reality to crete the pentalogic and rashomon effects of superorganisms. It is done in the HIGHEST most ABSTRACT generalized form, with little examples, which are dealt with in specific sciences. We illuminate the whys of the praxis of classic science, the other extreme of maximal detail in small scalar planes, and its method of gathering data, connecting facts that will repeat in the cyclical future. Science thus drinks also of the most evident intelligence of reality: it doesn’t though oblige man to be intelligent in the larger modeling, but just methodic in its small steps and that is fine. The scientific method is not intelligent but very effective and helpful. But here we want to explore a higher intelligence than that of the small step mind, the largest view of the program of exist¡ence.

The scientific method suffices in praxis. The beauty of the system is that each one is closed into its local present routines and actions that suffice – even the monologic of ænthropic man works in small stœps. The program allows its mindless practitioneers to repeat routine and method, despite its largest intelligence, which is a simple organic pentalogic worldcycle – and that is what we describe here the largest possible view, the most homologic, the simpler one – the whole.

On life and time, thus we shall talk. On pentalogic entangled supœrganisms and Dodecalogic worldcycles, describing a game that for the monologic scientist dedicated to the detail will be largely irrelevant.

The formal version for future computer systems. Maximize your existence.

Ultimately this largest view shows how a simple fractal Generator of space-time, the metric equation of the fifth dimension, Max. ∑ SxT (s=t) seen as a super organism in space, which develops in 3 ages between its §eed state and entropic death explains all what exist, making the Universe a fractal self-reproductive system of information= forms in action, dimensions of space with time motions. Pentalogic thus is the highest ‘synoptic mirror’ of the ∞ worldcycles of exist¡ence of the Universe, and we are all variations of its 5 Dimensional motions of Spacetime.

If we were to follow that avenue, we will just write it in existential ilogic, departing from that equation, exhausting its partial equations, each one a part of the entangled being, and then developing only the possible actions. This will be the ‘highly formal existential deterministic science of ilogic’. And I am sure it will be what AI scientists will do soon. I am not interested though on the praxis but the metaphysics of 5D. I know it can be done because 25 years ago I did it. I bought a 30 meters roll – I was then heavy into painting – and starting with the equation developed the entire formalism with symbols. On my wondering, wandering life that role got lost in a depot in LA; it was then when I coined my personal motto, ‘I know the thoughts of God, we are its details’.

The thought is simple, maximize your existence, be greedy, be thirsty, be in permanent heat, live… It is only part of my personal freedom that once I found the program I have denied it, rebel, tried to change it for the larger picture of mankind with failed activisms, I have as Marx and Prometheus did, shouted, ‘I hate all Gods’

Since the Universe is a harsh master, deterministic, obliging you in 2 paths – practice the mandate or die.

 

 

PART III: COMPLEX REPRODUCTION: FROM TRINITY TO DECALOGIC.

Trinity Generates Planes & Space-Time Symmetries

Trinity is the name of the game, which is natural to the fact that causality exists, and so there is always an up and down scale in the fifth dimension, a left-right, back-forward element in a system, and a past-future. What we have unveiled further is the symmetries between those three ∆-s-t components, and the capacity of linguistic minds to put it all into still ‘continuous image’ as a whole

3 numbers could resume it all, 1,0 and ∞. Amazingly as it seems they can be seen as the ternary sides of the same structure, 0,the center, |-the membrane, ∞, the internal cycles between both that mirror the infinite Universe.

Thus infinity only reaches till the limits of its Whole:

The |-membrane,  the • singularity & the ∞ cycles between them form an island universe, a fractal superorganism and its world cycles.

The study of the interaction of those 3 elements that compose all §upœrganisms is thus an essential part of GST, which can be inscribed in an even larger concept: the ternary, Universal grammar of all systems, and its fractal ternary sub-divisions ad infinitum.

So in this blog and related ones, we shall deal with ‘TRINITY’ (-;

In the graph, trinity is the structure of reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane:

-Trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, OR subconscious collective of mankind (Jung) communicates its laws of ethic survival which express the fifth dimension of eusocial love, in human verbal languages, through its ‘nervous, informative system’, the language of the wor(l)d through its prophet≈scientist of history, where ‘the word, our God, becomes man and inhabit among us’, as the ‘canon’, or ideal form of the game of existence that humans should imitate to form with its revelation books and memes, a collective ‘DNA’, which brings together all its cellular citizens, supporting that collective mind God, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution; which if humans obey, will help them to evolve and survive from species into super organism, but if not, will bring them likely its collective death through hate-memes and weapons, the ‘bad fruits of the tree of science’.

So the prophet, who foresees the future logically (though a physical interpretation will mean, as information can jump a quantum cycle into the smaller ∆-1 past, which co-exist with the future whole, that actually the future death of a cultural God co-exist with the past life of the cells that host it),  spells those laws to its quantum cells back to the past a generation. THUS the entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprints with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet, a biological generation 72 ages, exactly the moment of death of Yhwh when 1/3rd of its believers died in the roman holocaust, the month of Ab, 72 years in ‘lineal time’ latter, in the same moment in co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, of the birth of Jesus . Alas, GSTheology is born and we have proved the most debated questions of Christianity – the mistery of trinity, the proof that Jesus is Son of Yhwh, the god-mind of the jewish people, and that he is a prophet  (: hem… ‘believe it or not’.

But trinity is also the cutlery ternary division and its Gst equation: ‘|-ST (knife) < Ø-ST-fork > O-St (spoon); as the knife delivers entropy the food, the spoon acts as the spherical membrane that surrounds it and the ‘last to come’ and more complex fork, with one of the 2 ‘hyperbolic geometries’ of space-time (fractal branching), which performs the functions of the other 2 (perpendicular holding and lateral cutting). We deal with trinity in depth in this post, its sub posts on Æ,  Universal grammar and those ‘attached’ to the Fractal generator.

Just two examples that show you the power of the GST formalism, which besides the usual questions about mathematical physics, will be explaining such seemingly ascientific questions as religious mysticism and table etiquete (: As a true t.œ, has indeed to explain in an efficient universe, all what exists, including good and evil≈anti-live≈death. And all the arts of the human mind:

Why I am so positive about GST laws? Obviously because of the experimental method, and its fundamental law of truth, which we can resume in a sentence:

‘A theory which is simpler (Occam’s razor) and explains more things with less elements (efficient Universe) is more truth’.

SO FAR NO MODEL OF REALITY CAN MATCH GST ON BOTH GROUNDS, AS IT EXPLAINS IT ALL WITH ONLY 2 elements, space and time (in fact inverse formal motions, hence ultimately with one element, ‘temporal energy’). Not a single human theory has been able even remotely to explain scientifically the 4 biggest realms of human thought, science, art, religion and the machine…

The fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.

∆± ∞, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.

But in most cases the system is just 1±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism.

It is a good moment to reflect on what all this means for the scientific understanding of the arrow of time and the nature of the Universe at large.

‘The 5th dimension is scalar, Time is asymmetric, informative; space is symmetric, entropic – with those 3 elements and its fractal parts and combinations, the Universe creates itselF.

A fractal, isomorphic organico-mathematical universe is a proposition quite different from the standard comfort zone of anthropomorphic science. It means we are in a living, organic universe where our importance is absolutely relative, and our dumbness born of the limited view of each point of view of this living universe.

Networks of simultaneity and resonance (informative axons): consciousness and emergence.

There are elements in the Universe which are difficult to understand in terms of ‘classic’ human thought and science, which are at the heart of the processes of ‘existence’, and emergence of information in upper scales, and organisation of parts into wholes. They deal with the fact that ‘St’ particles-heads-upper informative classes must be fully connected with its lower ∆-1 scale to synchronise, make it work together as a whole, resonate its orders in all lower systems and finally be conscious of a whole – and the key to all those processes are fractal branching networks, which unlike herds loosely connected in a single plane, conned the upper scale of a being with all its lower parts/regions.

It must be understood that those networks have many levels of connection between scales. They are though basically always the same. Informative networks break information in reproductive waves through axons and so they can produce informative actions of multiplication of information both ways through effects of simultaneity and resonance.

The resonance of all resonances, one can consider an imaginary space of dimensions of time – the 3 first dimensions those of a space of lesser form on which we transit – in our case the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space – all other dimensions becoming dimensions of scalar growth of information, through resonances between the larger and the smaller scales with self-similar forms, merely differentiated by its TIME metric:

Max. ST   = Min. St, the larger resonance encodes the smaller one.

How whole minds imprint smaller parts, through the simultaneous fractal network division of an impulse of maximal energy into multiple quantum’s of information. Such as E = h v, is proportional to the information the system emits (v) along an ‘H’, constant of space-time, or ‘lower field’ (S=t), from where the E(e) x V(i) body of ∆+1 extracts its energy of motion.

On the other hand, parallel networks of energy ,pipes and blood flow are less concerned with the form but with the energy it provides to the motion of its cells, and are based in adjacency and other topological, spatial properties.

The devil though is in the details, so once we understand this general picture of the whole, its parts and its common time world cycles, sum of all the frequencies of its space-time actions, which construct a super organism that will go through 3 ages between birth and extinction, as it carries as a whole its 3 ∆±1 scale of beings, we shall realise we just have explained they very surface of a extremely intelligent and complex world in which almost magically, all works together because of the complementary connections between simultaneous parts in space and synchronous rhythms in time and ‘resonant’ effects in scales.

So 4 ‘magic phenomena’ will be of enormous importance to fully grasp how ∆, S and T, dynamically organise (or inversely become disorganised):

  • Space Simultaneity, which is an a priori condition for a vital organic space to exist, and act efficiently as a whole.
  • Time Synchronicity, which is an a priori condition for a temporal ensemble of parts to exist, and act as a shoe.
  • ∆-Scale Resonance, which is the a priori condition for ‘parts and wholes’ to interact together.
  • Consciousness, which is an a posteriori condition of complexity in a panpsychic Universe: consciousness arises within any sufficiently complex, information-processing system. All animals, from humans on down to earthworms, are conscious; even the internet could be. That’s just the way the universe works.

TRINITY – THE ¬A LOGIC OF GST

 The few scholars i have been able to lure into this web (: are taken aback by the sheer size of its posts, its excessive disorder :(my fault), its polymath structure and complex ‘syntax’, that is logic formalism (the fault of the Universe:)

i am trying to improve my faults, but I am not of the opinion of my predecessor in the illustrious series of humind infinitesimals that in the modern age have evolved our paradigm of time-space … Descartes>Galileo> Newton>Leibniz>Darwin>Marx>Planck> Einstein>i-man (my old pseudonym, back in the 90s when at Columbia U. I used to self-publish books and send it around the globe)…

‘If General relativity is wrong, God should correct the Universe, so beautiful it is’. Well God is correcting… relativity, into Absolute relativity and who knows what else he would correct>improve in the future. So far this is the deepest view of his thoughts, as ‘the seer of time’ (Saint Augustine) And so we need to correct our humind mirror, maths and logic; maths by correcting geometry adapting it to fractal space, logic by introducing the essential concept of all languages which observe reality, the ternary symmetries between the mind languages an the S-T-∆ elements of reality.

In essence the key changes are the concept of an Euclidean point, which now becomes a non-euclidean fractal point that has breath as it has a vital inner space of energy, enclosed by a membrane or cyclical time-clock, focused into an informative still singularity or mind. So all points are fractal ternary points.

And for that reason, the logic of the Universe IS TRINITY, the study of its three parts in space, three ages in time, three scales in ∆; and the symmetries, mirror reflections and interactions between those 3 x 3+0 dimensions of reality; as the Universe is really in a visual simile, like a kaleidoscope, with four mirrors, the mind, the scales, the time ages and the spatial topologies communicating with each other and creating relationships between them.

Now, while the mind can be studied by its own linguistic elements it is often placed in the head-particle, St, so for sake of simplification we accept except for detailed analysis and epistemological philosophy its ‘equality’ with the St element of its spatial topology. So in general we eliminate the mind of our analysis (given also the difficulties to be accepted by anthropocentric humans). 

It is then when trinity can be resumed in a generator equation: ∆-1 Past Ts (limbs/fields) < ∆ Present TS BODY-WAVES> ∆+1 future St particle-heads.

And this Generator equation is the basic formal definition of each species (naming its parts), whose formal study gives birth to NON-Æ=I-LOGIC SCIENCE (i for information and next letter to a and e).

The use of a generator helps to make simpler the complex symmetries, similarities, reflections of time ages into space topologies into scales and so on. I.e. we just change the reverse order of the generator and it becomes a time symmetry: Ps (past) < ST (present) > ft (future). We reverse the symbols of > into < and information becomes entropy, and so on.

So the symbolism of ® is very useful to define all kind of events between the 3+0 elements or reality.

So trinity is a complex logic, but the simplex way to deal with it is the ternary principle, basis of our division of those four forms into 12 more detailed isomorphic elements to study in depth each species and its properties; which we can resume in many ways. Some are:

  • ‘Every element of reality can be subdivided into three ∆ST sub-elements diminishing in ∆§cales and viceversa, every three elements of reality with enough complementarity to create a larger whole can be assembled into an ∆§+1 system’.

i.e. your leg has a St ankle joined to the feet, a middle and and upper part; your fingers in palingenesis broke first from 1 to three and then the lateral ones into 2 to make five, which are the different type of fingers of all animals.

  • DUAL s-t and trinity s-st-t evolutions in time establish then the creative processes of the Universe. In languages from one a-languages we went into three vowels and five and then seven…. Complexity grows by subtle differentiations on the trinity principle.
  • THE TRINITY principle in kaleidoscopic terms means also: every phenomena in space, time or ∆-scale has A REFLECTION in the other two elements. Ie the three parts of space have three dominant ages in time, limbs in youth, heads in old age, bodies in the middle age, and relate closer to an ∆±1 scale: limbs to the ∆-i fields of entropy it absorbs, ∆º to the organic plane the body ‘mates to reproduce’; St, to the ∆+i worlds in which it performs larger cycles as part of a larger whole.

And finally as trinity means indeed reflections into t-s-st, ∆º±1 scales, topologies an ages, we talk of multi functionality:

  • Every system of reality to exist efficiently is able to develop three relative functions in its whole as entropic, informative and reproductive partial part.

Besides trinity there are then lower duality principles of logic of which two are important:

  • Entropy and information are inverse functions.
  • Species subdivide in gender states, wave-female states, s>S=t<t and male, particle-field state: S>T+T<S.
  • The ‘postulate of existence’ which requires at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist. Since without software and hardware, entry and information, without a dynamic flow/motion, the seed of information is latent, the vacuum space has no form. It is then the fusion of both, and its intermediate growth of a body-wave of communication, which introduces into present existence a being, and for that to happen there shall be a certain similarity between software and hardware; slowly comming together through its communication.

In the graph, the syntax of all languages can be reduced to dual and ternary structures that reflect the ternary elements of the fractal generator, Ts<St>St. Thus we can consider all languages mirrors of the generator, which in turn species use to order and project its imagination’, reproducing those mirrors through those languages into actions that mold the future of reality. Mind stiences therefore are essential to the way the Universe creates. The graph shows how a minimum of two parameters to represent entropy and information can create a mapping of reality, even though ternary languages are more precise. In the right the human verbal, temporal language and mathematical, spatial one, can be reduced to ternary dimensions (height-information, width-reproduction, length-entropy), ternary topologies, ternary symbols G(sT <action operandi>T(ƒ) and ternary sentences. Above a simple mathematical statement that relates a spatial function, D, and a temporal one, written BOTH in cyclical 1/ƒ=T and lineal time, below a scheme of the Universal grammar of all systems made of Names (informative element), verbs (actions) and Objects (energy of the Name). Both suffice for a whole mapping of reality.

So let us go part by part. We first upgraded your mind to black and white and then to the three colours/arrows your mind uses to view reality.

Now we shall enter into the territory you don’t see – the mind itself, behind those languages that simplify reality into information.

So we need only a final element, the mirror mind of information or central singularity that apperceives it all.

As those three time arrows in each instant cannot be seen, systems become mirrors that visualise the motions of time in simultaneous measures of space, a mind can conceive a linguistic mapping/mirror of those three topological motions and see how through time they develop structures synchronised as ‘space-time organisms’.

The Universe is a fractal of 3 timespace arrows, entropy, energy and information. This simple elements in its infinite variations and combinations defines the Universe, with a logic and mathematical that present science lacks, despite its awesome achievements in terms of mathematical description and praxis of manipulation of reality.

Philosophy of science though is not so much concerned with the capacity to manipulate reality with precise measures and a posteriori accounting of all process as ‘patterns’ that will repeat in the future and can be manipulated. But with the reasons and whys of those processes, which are considered to be ‘rational’,  ‘selfish’ and ‘biological’; that is, systems act to survive, and they do so from their central point of view or singularity-mind of information, by controlling and ordering a territory around them, enclosed by a cyclical time-like membrane.

And so the 3 functions-forms of time-space, ‘spatial lineal entropy’, ‘repetitive energy’ and ‘informative cyclical dimensional form’ combine together to create ‘entities’ which are the essential ‘particle of reality’, not some arid physical parameter, but an organic structure of scalar space-time, the supœrganism (Ab. œ, following the rule of slightly change terms in english to serve the new paradigm). 

Thus we can rephrase our definition: ‘the Universe is a supœrganism, made of 3 timespace functions/forms, assembled into ternary physiological networks, that process spatial=motion, informative dimensional form and its iterative combinations, in order to survive as a balanced structure’.

It is then time to connect this seemingly new view of reality with the tradition of philosophy of sciences, as philosophers have always understood it.

Culture over science.

Now, all this clear a big question hauls over our understanding of the Universe. Why mankind has been unable to describe scientifically its three arrows of time and only ‘admits’ entropy; even if in earlier time of history, Asian cultures with its duality visnu-shiva and yin-yang, equivalent to the duality information-entropy, were so closely to make sense of all of it?

The answer will surprise the reader, who mistakingly believes today as it believed in the past, that ‘science is truth per Ts’ and proved with no errors or cultural attachments – as people though religion was proved by dogma. Here the element missed in his discourse is ‘cultural bias’ in science and ‘postulates without proof’, ‘ceteris paribus analysis’, ‘anthropocentrism’, ‘power’ and ‘hyperbole’… all concepts natural to the human psyche a priori of any scientific statement.

In that sense entropy only theories are indeed a bias of the military, power-profession of physicists making weapons and motion machines, and it has always been so, becoming dogma. Entropy was discovered in the study of steam machine motion, as a product of gaseous heat; which is ONLY one of the three states of matter:

Gas (entropy state) < liquid (balanced state) > Crystal-solids (information state).

So it is obvious that the laws of kinetic gases are entropic but it is absurd to expand them to the whole of Nature, by simply ‘eliminating’ from philosophical analysis the other two arrows. And the same happened when in an astounding ‘hyperbole’ Helmothz from the ‘military culture of Germany’, expanded it to the Universe, affirming it was dying and further more, Gamow, a Nuclear-weapons maker affirmed the Universe was always and only a ‘gas-like expansive state’, again reducing the three arrows of the Universe; so well resumed in Einstein’s awesome equation: E=CCM, which he inferred in fact from the inverse arrow of informative, accelerated vortices of mass information, in his landmark: can mass be created out of entropy? So in this formula we have again the three arrows: 

Entropic expanding intergalactic space E< c²≈st  constant wave of light space-time > M Imploding masses and charges (galaxies)

And yet again, physicists and western cultures just used it to make entropic bombs and declare the Universe had only a similar big-bang exploding arrow.

There is here the side of dogma, and repetition and the believers memorial nature of the human mnd. As 1/2 of mankind believe that a  bronze age donkey-breeder tribe who saw a bush burning, understood the meaning of the Universe (Abrahamic religions) and react offended to any attempt to ‘reasoning’ historically this hallucination, just because the word ‘god’ is sacred; 1/2 of them believe the Universe is in a permanent state of entropy, dismissing the other so evident, experimentally, arrows of time, proper of all the generator equations of all systems of nature.

There is nothing though you can do to change a ‘believer’s mind’. In religion is called dogma, in science ‘first postulates’, which always show on the long term to be partial, ceteris paribus, analysis of the whole ternary reality. So for example, euclidean flat space turned out to be one of the three possible geometries of reality, because it was a postulate.

And an entropic Universe shows to be both in space and time one of the three parts of it. So in EFE (Einstein’s equations) the three solutions, steady state, big bang and big crunch are the equivalent processes in time to the three parts in space, and we will see that beautiful time-space symmetry soon).

In that sense, we can say that the entropic postulate of a single arrow of time is a product of the white western male war oriented culture and its manifest destiny, throughout the whole history of the western world, opposed to the dualist and ternary cultures of the west. So we can now introduce a historic view of those cultures, because its postulates today pass as science, and are by no means scientifically proved by experimental evidence, which shows a ternary Universe always.

So we shall use exactly what we have proved – the ternary only topologies of the Universe and its three space-dimensions/time functions, to the racial make-up of mankind, since as it happens is the origin of a new of the many sub-sciences derived of gst that studies…

i-logic, TERNARY TIME: WHOLES:  3 PARTS & 3 X3+0 DIMENSIONS

Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of paths, S, T or ST to act or no to act (-1 action), with equal probabilities. is to map out a new existential ilogic (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 -1 possibilities.

Why the Universe has 3 positive ternary actions (and a negative, passive no-action) is self evident:

-1: The mind might merely observe and stops motion (•),.

+3: Yet the system might evolve towards higher entropy (+ST, higher information (+St) or might reproduce its space-time in repetitive cycles, which on the long term will become a larger ‘whole’ (∆).

So the existence of 4 elements, ∆•ST, 3 of increasing motion along the 3 paths of space-time (S, st, ∆st) and one of growing stillness (•), implies a more complex logic with 4 potential actions for each bifurcation of past-present into the future.

Of course, if we were to study a ‘fresh beginning’, the probabilities of those futures would be the same. But as the Universe is a game of memorial, informative motions, it follow that as the game proceeds, the future paths become determined by the long cyclical causality of individual actions and past cycles to be completed into the future.

So while paths do have a possibility to be modified without expenditure of energy, closed time cycles impose their ‘inertia’ and so the perfect potential ‘fourks’ of space-time (four point forks). The image is meaningful: as always we have a ‘lineal, entropic knife’; an informative, cyclical ‘spoon’ and an ∆•ST, 4-dimensional fork to both cut and  form the food in present space-time. And you would choose, if given a single pick, the fork precisely because it can cut laterally and it can scoop the food. Everywhere the rules of GST will enlighten ‘why things are as they are’; and the causes of the past or the fourkations of the future will be ternary±1.

The causal ‘bifurcations of timespace’ thus are now ‘fourkations’ of space-time. And so the extraordinary one-dimensionality of human minds and its languages are out of meaning. Those arduous arguments between wannabe geniuses sponsoring their ‘point of single view’ as the real cause must cease. Ceteris paribus is simplification. For a being to exist, for a cause to act, for an event to happen in fact it will be because 3 past causes have converged to form a whole time-space ternary symmetry. Think of your actions, when you move, the mind first ‘thinks’ in the motion; the body then provides the energy; the limbs convert it into entropy. It would seem there is only one cause to action, the motion of the legs, but actually 3 actions converged in a ‘dharma of time-space’ to make it happen. Yet for the non-action only the mind is needed to stop action; which therefore is an ‘easier path’.

So the languages we use to portray that process are naturally different from the classic ones. And unlike analysis so close to the social scales of GST and fractals & topology, essentially ‘the’ spatial science of the fractal Universe, algebra as it is understood today, is basically a synoptic way to deal with topological and analytical theorems. And its proper structures, sets and groups must be understood as expressions of our social groups and ITERATIVE, MOVING laws, based in symmetries, transformations and motions through ‘polynomial scales’. But as the language is so different, we rather start afresh and include as we go along the main field worthy of classic algebra, which is NOT sets but group theory.

Temporal, Æxistential ilogic, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory. Still it is worth to remember the basic elements of Algebra and its equivalence.

The ternary operandi of Æ… and its symmetry with ∆ST elements.

Actions and its causes are thus the ultimate inquire of existential ilogic. Why and how motions of space-time happen. And what is the formal way to define them?

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of classic algebra, such as group theory, with so many practical cases in science, which translate the TSymmetries and motions through ∆-scales, is the nature of existential ilogic and the different equations of motions and species creations, through those motions and actions, which always render a certain ‘syntax’:

Past ‘Operandi’ Future= present.

The operandi between past and future, entropy and information, thus define what kind of present space-time event or entity appear to us. Because we have 4 elements to define existence, operandi are many, not only a simple ± symbol to ad or rest the same type of beings or motions, as when physicists study only locomotions and reduce all to a Hamiltonian ± operandi between the two O-potential and |-kinetic ‘states’ of form-entropy.

So each motion of time will have a different ‘algebraic operandi’, departing from our initial ‘Universal Grammar’.

We shall consider in this introduction the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are:

Locomotion: Hamiltonian (Entropic, kinetic Past motion ± Future, Potential motion = Present (superposition motion of waves).

Reproduction: Past (field)  x Future (information)  = Present (iteration)

And the rule is simple, from classic algebra: a superposition or sum is of the same ‘species’; hence ‘energies (time-like)’ or ‘momentums’ (space-like), etc.

A Product can however combine different species. So it is normally a motion, which involves a space and time-like parameters:

Reproduction mixes the ST and St, different ‘genders’.

Finally, the 3rd mode of algebraic equations, polynomials/logarithms, correspond to the ∆-scale of growth or diminution.

So again we find an immediate relationship between the 3 elements of reality, S or T, ST and ∆ST, in its growing complexity and the 3 basic operandi of algebra, sum, product and polynomials.

What about the more complex scalar ‘motions’ of space-time? They are not that simple, as they combine elements of the pure ones. But as all ternary, Universal grammars, the complexity is born of the iteration of those elementary motions:

  • Evolution is a change in the topology of a system, so essentially a process of space-time morphological in-form-ative change better described with topological elements.
  • Growth and diminution involves reproduction and evolution of topological form and its inverse.
  • Birth and extinction represent an ∆±1 change, combined with an ∆T increase of information or a loss of it all ∆S, which are often expressed with logarithmic scales.

And so most motions involve both a Past to future, ∆+1, social evolutionary arrow accompanied with changes in topology. And as such are pure ‘GST’ Ælgebraic motions, better described with the formalism of Æ and its symbols S>T, T<<S, ∑∆-1 Λ ∆… and so on.

Since in its most general form, algebra is the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating these symbols; the definition holds. And as algebra is a unifying thread of almost all of classic mathematics, so happens with Ælgebra.

In that regard, classic algebra (we shall call arithmetics) includes everything regarding those 3 operations, ±, x, % and log, x². And its symmetry as we have seen is immediate.

While modern algebra deals with the study of abstractions such as groups, rings, and fields; sets and Boolean algebras; and categories and elements… So we can subdivided Æ in 3±1 age subfields:

Birth: the study of æ proper (existential equations).

Youth: of classic polynomial equations or arithmetics (S,t; st and ∆ systems in its interaction).

Maturity: of abstract structures, or algebra proper concerned, with group theory (the internal social structures of the Universe).

Old age: of inflationary information (set theory and other ‘weird’ algebras)

Extinction: the transference from human minds to digital minds (computer algebra, boolean algebra)

∆@st of space-time and its limits in space, time, ∆-scales and mind perception.

So space-time is always in its whole ‘plenum beings’ made of 3 elements, which in topology, are called:

-St: the singularity or monad-mind in its centre of maximal communication

-Ts: the membrane or limiting, hard entropic circular system that encloses

-ST: the space-time much larger reality that mixes lineal expansive outer membranes and internal singularities:

ALL systems of physics and biology and sociology show the same ternary elements: the membrane singularity and space-time between them.

In the graph physical systems, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics to  gravitational gradients, charges in physics, have the 3 parts. In biology they are cellular protein membranes and nuclei and cytoplasm, skins and brains and organs. In sociology they are national borders and capitals, and the internal territory. In non-euclidean geometry (right side, the inner parts cannot reach the membrane, and so it appears as a relative infinity, and the central singularity (A point), connects with all the points within the membrane, as its focus of information. It is that constant interaction between membrane and singularity what moods the internal vital space of energy/momenta, of the being.

In physics all Maxwell’s laws can be deduced from the existence of an external circular membrane (magnetism). So happens in gravitation, (orbits which ‘scan a bidimensional aerolar surface). And all systems will be centred in a singularity (attractive vortex, charge).

Moreover we shall see that TIME has also those limiting membranes (death) and informative centres (seeds of information at birth).

And the scalar Universe will have also those non-E unreachable limits, (Universal Constant limits of c-speed and To temperature).

All this is the essence of topology that defines an ‘open ball’ as the space-time volume limited by a central singularity and an external membrane, which are NOT perceivable, included within the open ball. 

So the concept of finite infinities, limiting membranes in space, time (birth-death) and scales (limiting unreachable constants of maximal information and maximal extension) are essential to understand formally and logically the Universe.

We are limited in time by the birth-death finite enclosure of our world cycle of existence, in space by the skin/membrane that breaks space-time into us; and in the scales of size of the ‘5th dimension’ by the increasing ‘blurred uncertainty and dark spaces’ which limits our perception of them beyond the ∆±3 scales of atoms and galaxies.

And so we are also limited in the knowledge the mind might acquire of all the information of the universe, which only a being holds about itself, making ‘absolute truth’, 1, in terms of probability, only ‘existing’ in the being in itself.

Those four limits of birth and death, of absolute seeds of information (seminal seed) and entropy (explosive death); of singularity (the mind of information) and membrane (the skin) in space; of organisation above and below, in ∆±1 levels; and in knowledge provided by the limits of the language are essential to any understanding of man as a limited being, in a ∞ universe, but man does not recognize those limitS. Hence the astounding arrogance of scholars, scientists, dogmatic axiomatic methods of ‘truth’ (Hilbert in mathematics, which still denies Godel’s incompleteness theory). And the result of course is that you have a human astounding ego, who thinks to be so special, so unique, so unlimited, so galactic and Universal and YET IT IS SO IGNORANT.  And all what it does is to hold its pretension of infinity.

The decametric tetrarkys scale: 3 x 3 +o = 10. ∆-1: THE 10 DIMENSIONAL INNER PERSPECTIVE.

Pythagoras as Plato latter said that numbers are forms, as they were in the earlier age of mathematical geometry, where a number was a group of points, whose form mattered. So he realized 10 was the perfect number, because of its perfect form.

And indeed the internal structure of any being reaches its perfect efficiency with a 3 x 3 +0-mind  symmetry of form and function; where each part-number performs one of the 3 physiological entropy, energy, information jobs of the system and the central mind-number in contact with them all coordinates its functions.

‘The universe is written in the language of geometry, lines, spheres and triangles’. Galileo had a point – all reductionist views of reality are indeed half-truths. But in this case it is a huge truth.

The languages of the Universe are mainly 3, Topology, the most advanced form of geometry with a ‘bit of inner motion’, which describe the 3 ‘timespace’ only forms of reality – hence the determinism of topological evolution and the awesome capacity to describe it all with the ternary generator of those 3 topologies. 

Regarding triangles, intuitively humans both in earlier religion of words (Judaism) and Pythagorean religions of the number, were considered the ‘tetraktys’ and symbol of the ‘tetragrammaton’ (graph) – the symbol of it all.

As the 3 topologic organs of all systems (lineal, toroid limbs/fields; hyperbolic, body-waves & spheric, informative head-particles, shown in the graph, which need only a little imagination to convert into a woman’s body – first surface, a leg, second, and a head 3rd one), suffice to create reality.

Yet as all ‘is scalar’, all subdivides into ‘ternary fractal sub-elements’. So to include the co-existence in the 5th dimension of parts and wholes, we can immediately subdivide the 3 topologies into 3 ‘sub-elements’ and put them in each of the corners of the tetraktys/tetragrammaton; while the central point, which is perfectly connected to all others, is the soul-mind-0-point, 10th dimension – the system that is apperceives the whole, connects its and tries to preserve it, through the world cycle of being.

So  we also talk of 10 inner dimensions or ‘sub-systems’, represented by a tetraktys; which subdivide the 3 physiological networks into 9:.

In the graph, each 3 corners are sub-systems of ‘Information, entropy/motion and Energy/reproduction’ put together by a central 10th dimension (the black ball/hole/point/knot that messes with all of them). Indeed the central point of the ideal tetraktys communicates with all the other parts and embodies the whole that ’emerges’ as a point in a higher ∆+1 world.

Thus we talk of  the ‘subsystems’ of a being.

For example, a human being is defined in medicine as a system of cells, attached by 10 sub-systems:

In the upper left graph the 3 ST-ructural sub-systems of the human body, which are its structural forms (membrane, sustain and motion).

In the bottom the 3 ‘chemical St’ systems or hormonal brain (creative, distributive and reproductive)

In the middle the 10th system (nervous system)

And in the upper right 2 of the 3 ‘ST Subsystems lymphatic, digestive (not portrayed the urinary/excretor system)

(The reader should get accustomed to the ‘taste’ of GST which is the homologic, isomorphic method, of putting always a physical, biological and socio-economical example of the 3 main sub-disciplines of knowledge to show the unity of it all as we illustrate reality).

Alas, the growth in the ‘5th dimension of scales’ happen through 10 dimensional ‘social organisation’.

Thus the previous graphs of Eames’ ‘Powers of 10’  is also the game of social existence.

Since it is also the number of quanta of space-time needed either in frequency or in population (spatial organic or temporal world cycle view of a system), either through time or space to create a new social scale (ab. §) that ‘becomes a new larger functional whole’ able to apperceive and process entropy-motion, informative forms and combine them through the ‘3rd corner’ to ’emit seminal’ reproductive particles, coordinated by the central whole.

Let us though then, once this is understood depart from reductionist ‘mathematical physics’ , and realise that what truly matters is organic function, not the triangular form, beyond the obvious fact it is the most perfect ‘packed’ functional way to put 10 elements together.

So when we study specific species what we shall see is that ‘fractal points’  of space-time (beings) gather through networks of entropy, information and reproduction (in man, the digestive: sT, blood, st, Head, St systems, which define our physiological structure), into a being. So humans in medicine are defined by 3 x 3 ±¡ sub-systems to which fractal points≈ cells attache themselves. This is the essential formal way to study in detail beings: through its 10 sub-dimensions of being; which for the whole known Universe would look like.

 

@-MINDS: TRILOGIC OF MIND PERSPECTIVES

 The organic whys of the Universe: 

In the graph, the geometrical perception from Ƽ, the human self-centred perspective (ab.pov) differs from the way we perceive information from the upper scale, seen as an only attractive gravitational vortex of future time-masses (relativity theory, equivalence principle) from the perspective of an elliptic geometry that reduces the size of the whole masses by speeding up its perception as motion.

In the left side the perception of lower scales is a lovacheski’s geometry, which multiplies the whole in its self-similar parts to get to the infinitesimal, which is the ‘piece’ on the membrane of the border o the whole, such as Sti=∑ST-1, the infinitesimal components of the membrane. Thus quantum and relativity descriptions of upper and lower scales differ

The Universe evolves from simple light space-time into particles, that gather socially into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, organisms, and social super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies and universes. Such scale means in mystique terms that the Universe ‘loves’ and wants members of the same species to evolve socially into larger wholes that survive better than individuals.

The fifth dimension of space-time (physical concept), the laws of evolution of ‘SPECIES’ (not individuals) into more successful social systems (ants and humans being the most successful animals precisely because of its social evolution) and THE LOVE messages of prophets=historians of the future, who express the law of eusocial love in human verbal terms to make humans understand that survival means to evolve together into a global super organism, UNO/EU style are just expressions of the same Universal law. And this indeed the stuff of this blog: to prove that departing from the simple principles of time, space and social organic evolution we can explain it ALL including sciences, arts and religions and deduce from those simple laws  all the equations, events and species of the Universe.

And so this is the Universe in a nutshell, cracked to see its core, what Einstein called ‘the thoughts of God’. Since indeed the rest, all of us space-time beings are ‘its details’; which important as they are, we study with  ‘stiences’ (sciences of space-time beings), each one dedicated to the analysis of the species of one ‘scale’ of size of that fractal Universe of growing space-time wholes. So what the blog will do is to explain the ‘thoughts of god’ in the first line in a more discursive, easy way; formalising those principles on the second line, to connect them mathematically, organically and logically with all the laws of equations of ‘stiences’, scale by scale in the 3rd line.

Since all what exists has mathematical=spatial properties, (S), logic, casual, temporal properties (T),  co-exist at least in 3 ‘organic’ planes of parts and wholes, your inner cellular world, your individual being and the larger world in which you exist (∆±1) and finally do have a ‘mind-point’ (•), whose ‘languages of information’ stored in cyclical logic patterns, perform the actions of energy and time that ensure the balance and survival of the being, by first mapping out the ∞ universe in the small infinitesimal mind of the being, and then acting on that mapping searching for entropy of motion, energy for its body-wave and information for its mind-particle.

IN THE GRAPH, the different geometries looking upward into the elliptic less informative whole, and downwards into the more informative multiple cellular side. YET those systems behave euclidean, ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆-1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’ in a hyperbolic path to the ∆-1 scale.

The symmetries between the three scales, topologies and time functions of the whole system commanded by a first center, 10th dimensional soul of will º∆º (a mind in the ∆º-self centred scale), gives us the 3×3±1 fundamental elements we must play to re-create reality.

Since, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.  

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models. 

Mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply 1 into ∞ similar forms. They are the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance difficult to bend. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: inflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. 

So opposing those ‘ego-trips’ there is scientific realism, which this blog will further evolve (Aristotle, Leibniz and Einstein beings its most outstanding AUTHORS), and reasons that reality must be made of the ultimate substances we observe IN reality, which are NOT phonemes and numbers, nowhere to be seen IN REALITY but space and time, and hence by evolving our concepts of vital spaces and time durations, we shall be able to extract properties common to all beings, even though they will be partially distorted by the mind-mirrors (verbal time logic and spatial mathematics) we human use to describe them.

So the key to increase our understanding of reality IS first to understand space and time and its properties, THEN, evolve our logic of verbal time and our topology of spatial mathematics to match those properties and focus better our mirror, and finally, to apply the improved mathematical-verbal logic mirrors to create organic better models of all sciences that happen in time and space, interpreting better the equations of sciences and solve with those models and improved mirrors the data we gather about reality, on which present science clearly excels (but drags behind problems of creationism and lack of understanding and evolution of mathematics).

In the transition from the age of human dominance to the age of computer dominance as the mind making science, which today increasingly is just a process of feeding data into computer models without any search for the whys and principles that unify reality, the earlier founding fathers of physics and economics mixed both creationist theories. So biblical fetish go(l)d religions became classic economics where money, a digital language of information substituted verbal laws in the ruling of western societies, and Kepler like Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him the laws of gravitation felt themselves equal to God, their chosen digital masters. And so when Newton died, Pope told us: And God created Newton and light was born.

Universal grammar of different trinity languages

Important to that development of Biological sciences, (and all other sciences) would be to know the formal, ‘diffeomorphic’ symmetries between the aforementioned ‘3 dimensions of space, 3 dimensions of time, and 3 dimensions of social evolution’ which together form a whole 10D being (cell, organism or species):

Finally we arrive to social sciences, and here, we have the lesser development in their understanding of what is man and how man

Since the key to fully grasp the Universe resides in the understanding of those dimensions.

3 of them are well known, as they are ‘evident’, spatial:

– X, the dimension of length, Y, the dimension of height and its product, Width, Z.

The next 3 are hinted at, but are not so ‘evident’ as they are temporal:

– Past, the dimension of energy; Present, the iterative, reproductive dimension, that repeats an entity and hence seems not to change; and future the dimension of information.

Now the first ‘symmetry’ both physicists and biologists ignore is that between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 of time. Since:

Length is the dimension of energy and pure motion, as the line is the shortest distance between two points, and so it is the dominant dimension of young species and young individuals that ‘move a lot’.

– In the sample case we wanted to illustrate (the relationship between morphology and evolution in species), all species are born as ‘long’ flat forms. The first fishes were long, flat sharks; the first species were flat worms; the first earth-bounded animals were flat amphibian.

– Height is the dimension of information, as a tall position is an advantageous point of view of perception, as ‘projective geometry’ shows. So in social sciences we all know politicians and priests go up into a pulpit, and informative machines have tall antennas to distribute information and screens are flat, high forms.

And so are gravitational black holes in the center of galaxies that rule it with gravitational forces of in-formation that form the galaxy. And so on.

So in the biological case we study, life has on the whole evolved from a flatworm to a tall human being. And in each species the same process takes place, so Flat sharks flip their body into the perpendicular dimension of fishes, flat amphibian ended up becoming tall dinosaurs and birds, and mammals become bipedal.

Finally width, the product of the other two dimensions is the dimension of cellular reproduction, and so bodies grow in the width dimension and stars accumulate into a width, spiral dimensions, and Maxwell’s rule of thumb make any student understand that the combination of the ‘energetic’ and informative, magnetic and electric fields create a perpendicular dimension.

And light is an existential being with 3 ‘perpendicular’ axis, where in this particular case, the magnetic, electric and, speed axis are in a diffeomorphic perpendicular dimension to each other, each of them with an energetic, informative and reproductive function.

So the reader will notice again that as in the case of physics, knowing the ‘nature’ of the Game of existence and the meaning and symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and its 3 functions in time helps a lot to understand the whys of reality. As it did, in the previous example the understanding of the symmetry between the 3 ages of time and the 3 social scales from cellular birth into individual and finally into a social being.

So we shall now write those 3 ‘symmetries’ between the 3 type of dimensions of the Universe, because they encode the whys of infinite particular events in time and forms in space we observe in nature:

Past-youth-energy (Time D.) <=> Length (Space D.) <=> Cellular scale Dimension

Present-Reproductive-repetitive (Time D.) <=> Width <=> Individual Scale

Future-3rd informative age (Time D.) <=> Height <=> Social Scale

Thus the final group of symmetries, besides those of time with space, and time with social scales, are those of space with social scales, such as social ‘scales’ and classes in organisms, are ‘non-democratic’, put on the relative dimension or gradient of height, intuitively understood in human languages. So we talk of the ‘upper, informative classes’, we talk of a ‘higher plane of existence’. And vice versa, we talk of the lower, energetic classes, ‘destroyed’ and ab=used by the upper ones, and the ‘middle, working class’. While in all systems in which a ‘force of energy and information’ dominates the system establishing a ‘gradient of existences’, a ‘chain of beings’, the different elements are put in relationship to that gradient, with the ‘dominant’ informative element, over the reproductive, middle one, and above the energetic system.

So we establish a simple hierarchy between the ‘3 organs of a system’ and its dimensions, with the informative system on top. And this also brings us a general rule which Einstein alone understood: the Universe is local, diffeomorphic, fractal, as the dimensions and functions of each organic part of a system are relative to ‘where’ it finds its energy and information.

The classic example in biology is the inverse orientation of animals and plants. Plants absorb their energy from light, and information from chemical atoms. So their ‘up’ is our down, that is, their roots are their heads. And their limbs, that feed on light energy, their ‘leaves’, are on top.

On the other hand animals absorb information from light, so their head are on top, inverse to those of plants, and they move with the electromagnetic repulsive energy of their feet, stomping on the floor, from where they also get their energy, by feeding on other animals and plants. So they have ‘reversed’ local ‘diffeomorphic’ dimensions of energy and information.

On the other hand, ‘herds’ and energetic groups of the ‘lower’ scales, tend to be democratic; that is, they organize themselves in the same plane of flat lengths. And then what matters is their inner ‘organization’, which brings about the discovery by the first geometers and mathematicians, the Greeks, of ‘numbers’ as efficient geometries, with the tetrarkys, a 10 dimensional number, as the perfect number. And indeed, from a vital perspective of the game, it is a perfect distribution, with 3 smaller triangles in each angle, specialized in ‘energetic’, informative and reproductive functions and a central communicative point, knot of all the others, which communicate and regulate them. Thus 10 is not only the number of ‘dimensions’ but it is also, the perfect number of ‘units’ to perform the complete game, allowing each central knot of the tetrarkys to ‘emerge’ as the whole, which regulates the rest of the system and becomes unit of a next social scale. And so geometric, ‘platonic’ solids do matter in the configuration of efficient species, but not in the ‘galaxy’ ruled by a ‘gradient force’ so much as in the microcosmic, atomic scales – so atomic configurations in crystals have regular forms. And again, as the triangle and its social form, the Hexagon are the most perfect 2 Dimensional configurations in a single plane, the cube, with a central point-atom and/or a centered atom in each face connecting the other 4, becomes the most regular form of crystallography. And it is a fact that only 3 atomic configurations, the 2 aforementioned cubes and the hexagon exists on metallic substances, as they are the most perfect geometric ‘numbers’ of the game.

Fact those which lead us to the next ‘great discipline’ of ‘Unification Theory’, the name I have been using for the general systems theory of the Universe, as a description of its 10 Dimensional beings, the ‘will or game of existence’ that all those 10D entities play.

This is the game of existence, the ‘syntax’ of Universe, which is the sum of all those 10 Dimensional beings, in its eternal life-death worldcycle motions.

The structure of that process of creation and destruction of beings is fractal.

That means the same laws ‘embedded’ on the Universal grammar of the highest order (10 Dimensional beings) are used to create any species of reality.

And all its languages.

So for example, we can reduce any human language that describes the game with its ‘syntactic equation’.

Let us put 3 examples of those languages, verbal thought, mathematics and music.

As Chomsky and others discovered all verbal sentences have the structure of the Universal Grammar:

Subject (Information being – human) < Action-verb: Exi >Object (energy of the human being).

That is: I(subject)< Exi (action) > E (Object).

All mathematical equations are of the form: X=Y, where normally, the functions represents an energy or informative function, or a ‘relative symmetry’ of those expressed between dimensions, which are transformed into each other, or any of the more complex equations of exchange of fluxes of energy and information between beings; while = the operandi explains that exchange.

So in physics, we describe most processes as actions of ‘energy’ and time.

Where time is related to information, since a clock ‘stores’ the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of tis cycles. So either we describe ‘time frequencies’ or its inverse function, T=1/ƒ, frequencies.

And so for example: E=Mc2, written in Planck’s notation as E=M(t), shows the fundamental equation of physics, an exchange or transformation of energy into ‘vortices of information’, masses and charges, which are ‘eddies’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

While in particle physics its fundamental equation, Boson < => Fermion, describes also an exchange and transformation of energy particles (bosons) into informative ones (particles). On the other hand, the ‘3 families’ of mass (3 families of quarks) represent the 3 ‘scales’ of growing mass of those vortices. And so on and so on…

So a fundamental task of the work of this scientist has been to translate all the knowledge of all the jargons of all sciences to the simpler laws of the Game of 10 dimensional existences, which is truly the ‘Unification Theory of science’, again not very difficult to understand but certainly far more complex and deep in meaning and enlightenment that any ‘God’s particle’ or ‘mere unification of forces’ (which in any case it is not possible, in the terms physicists search with its limited understanding of the dimensions of time and the scales of the Universe).

Finally the Universal Syntax, also applies to those ‘creations’ of the human mind, which we call artistic forms. Of them, the one that represents closer the game of existence as Schopenhauer understood is Music, a ‘temporal art’ which he deemed to express the ‘will of the Universe’.

And indeed, we can consider that Music has in its highest expressions (classic music):

– The dimensions of space, which are given by harmony.

– The dimensions of time, which are given by melody.

– The scalar dimensions, which are given by its scales.

And we can as in all other disciplines and ‘arts of creation’ – as we could define, God, the Mind of the Universe, as an artist in 10 dimensions; go into as much detail as we want, studying music or a biological or physical or social organism, with those laws.

For example, western music uses a diatonic minor and major scale, which put together, have 10 notes.

Now those notes are divided into whole note intervals divided by ‘sharp-flat’ notes, which all together describe precisely a life-death time cycle:

Birth in minor key, first sharp-flat divide, youth, divide, maturity, divide, old age and finalis.

And a good composer will play that scale and notes to provoke a series of ‘emotions’ as it describes a whole life-death cycle, through melody.

On the other hand the wider range of scales in music is given by the Piano, which encompasses 3 whole ‘scales’, and it is the rule of music that when we finish a scale, the ‘next note’ of the higher scale sounds exactly as the equivalent note of the lower scale (a do in lower or higher pitch sounds equally in harmony), as we have ‘emerged’ into a new scale.

Finally there are 3 types of instruments, of growing complexity, the rhythmic, percussion instruments, the melodic, wind instruments dominant in melody, and the strings, dominant in harmony.

So we start to find with this simple introduction to musical theory many of the ‘symmetries’ between the 3 ‘dimensions’ of each of the 3 ‘space, time and scale’ elements of reality.

It is not then surprising that the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy  machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.

∆¡≈1,2. HUMAN SYSTEMS

Gender diffeomorphism women are hyperbolic waves, men are entropic particles.

In a Universe made of an infinite number of time arrows that gather together into ‘complementary knots’ of Entropy and information, each being is a relative fractal Universe, which we call a ‘world’ or ‘space-time being’ that deploys its particular ‘directions of height-information’, ‘length-Entropy’ and ‘width-reproduction’, different from those of other beings. All those fractal Universes interact through its particular, ‘local’=diffeomorphic coordinates, which departing from a central Non-Euclidean Point of view, or relative ‘self’, establish the 3 relative, perpendicular, minimal dimensions of any fractal world that signal its arrow of Entropy, information and reproduction.

The first and most important emergence of properties of lower scales, is the emergence of the 3 axis through which the entity expresses departing from its point of view with ‘will’, the 3 arrows of informative perception, energetic motion and reproductive growth. The 4 arrow doesn’t need a four spatial dimension because it is the point of view, which uses an internal language and ‘algorithm’ of choice to alternate action in each of the 3 dimensions of spatial existence.

Thus there will be a point of view that directs the whole system, with the aim of achieving maximal reproduction, by switching between the arrow of informative perception and Entropy taking, in order to accumulate enough of it and reproduce more cells in the dimension of width/reproduction.

This happens in the two fundamental forms of the Universe:

The radial form, with the informative point in the center; which corresponds to forms dominant in information and minimal motion.

The bilateral, lineal form, with the head in the direction of motion, which corresponds to lineal energetic systems.

Most often though species can switch between both forms and they do so in rhythms of Ts->O, from the Ts(day)>O(sleep), extended>coiled position, to the 3 ages of galaxies which evolve from extended nebulae to implosive spirals that end up in a 3rd globular age.

In the graph, 3 diffeomorphic beings and its relative arrows of Entropy and information: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information, pointing towards the central informative black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative/energetic dimensions are inverted. Since plants use light as Entropy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information from the sky, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorb chemical information.

Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as often happens between Entropy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Such Entropy/information, relative past/future inversions happen in all Universal systems. For example, they happen between a ‘particle’ and its ‘antiparticle’, which in a Feynman diagram have also inverted coordinates of space-time, as the antiparticle travels to the past. They also happen in mental, linguistic codes that represent that external reality. For example, eviL=death is the exact inverse word of Live. Since indeed, for a living human being, there is no bigger eviL than death.

Yet, death, a release of Entropy that kills is the inverse function of information, the arrow of life. So the linguistic, spatial inversion of words corresponds also to an inversion of time arrows – a fact that explains scientifically the biologic meaning of ethics. Since humanity, history and religion are a sociological space-time that obeys the same homological isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times. Thus each species establishes its own up and down arrows; its relative Entropy and informative directions, departing from that central knot of information, which is gauging and perceiving.

What classic science denies and system sciences proves is the reality of an existential will in that perceptive Ts=I Informative knot, which controls the entire organism and directs its search for ‘åctions’ that provide Entropy and information to the being. It is precisely the infinite number of Discontinuous, Non-Euclidean Points of View, what creates a general arrow of Information in the Universe that constantly reproduces the form of those entities and balances the arrow of continuous entropy, Entropy motions and expanding space, which physicists dogmatically consider the only arrow of the Universe.

According to the Principle of Correspondence, any new theory has to include the previous theories within it and solve the questions unresolved by all those previous theories. Since the XX C. theory of space-time is Relativity, it is unavoidable, to explain the Principle of Local Relativity from the perspective of the Time Arrows of each species.

Relativity establishes that in any point of the Universe the coordinates of the entity (the up and down, right or left directions) are different from those of any other point of the Universe, as they only depend on what happens in that local region of space/time. This is only possible if space/times are fractal, discontinuous, broken into infinite points of view that gauge and map the information of reality from its own perspective.

Relativity thus is at the core of the structure of the fractal reality and must be considered the right step into the process that has taken the knowledge of multiple space-times from Leibniz’s analysis of relational space-time to this book, which generalizes all those findings to all disciplines and species.

According to Relativity what happens in a point of space-time doesn’t affect what happens in other isolated, discontinuous point. Each space-time fractal is a Relative Universe=World in itself. Thus the isomorphisms of space-time apply locally to each fractal ‘species, superorganism or world’ that will reflect those isomorphisms in its own structure. We are local, ‘diffeomorphic’ species; our time-space coordinates are relative. Time wrinkles our vital space in the process of aging with different speeds, depending on our content of Entropy and information.

Hence the diffeomorphic principle also establishes different informative cycles – the multiple ‘clocks’ of Nature that show different speeds and locations. Yet since space is synonymous of Entropy and time synonymous of information, we can establish the local coordinates of space-time of each being by establishing its relative informative and energetic arrows – its relative body and head – using the invariant Isomorphisms and dimensions of all spaces and times, as long as we can localize the origin of those arrows; that is, the Non-Euclidean point of view, where the will of the Entity ‘exists’.

Some geometrical tips about the location of those points in any superorganism or world should guide researchers:

– The point will be a relative ‘unmoved’ Aristotelian God, cause of the motions of all the other elements of the organism.

– The point has the max. density of information and the max. number of connections with all the parts of the organism.

– The point is either in the center or top of the organic system.

– The point is a spherical or convex, informative shape.

Thus in a human being the point of maximal will is in the eye-brain system, on top, with spherical (eye) and convex (brain form), which has the maximal connections with the rest of the body (nervous axons), the maximal density of information and it is the part of the organism which maintains more often a still position (balanced by the negative sensation of vertigo.)

In a historic organism, the point will be the capital, most likely in the zone of maximal communication of the nation – a coastal port, like London, Amsterdam, Rome or Athens or a central city like Madrid, Moscow, Mexico.

In a cell the point is in the center, with max. DNA information. In a galaxy, the point is in the center, where a swarm of black holes control from its unmoved position the motion of stars.

Indeed, according to the ‘Diffeomorphic Principle of Relativity’, every fractal space-time is independent of all the others; since it has different spatial and informative orientations. Yet we can recognize its informative and energetic organs in relationship to each other, since both will respond to the opposite dimensions and morphologies of Entropy and information.

Those isomorphisms of geometry also allow us to study ‘dual’ complementary entities of Entropy and information (Bodies/Brains, fields of forces/particles, energetic victims/ predators), which will create complementary entities that last in time (organisms) or are Darwinian events where the larger, energetic victim is prey of the smaller, informative point.

In the graph, in biological species animals use light as information and so they are ‘informative’, smaller and faster than plants, which use light as Entropy and are ‘big, slow’ beings.

Thus plants are the relative Entropy of animals. Further on, since what it is Entropy for plants is information for animals, both species have opposite Entropy-time coordinates: plants have their brain upside down in their roots that ‘feel’ chemistry; while animals have their brain on top, looking at the light they use as information. In the cosmological scale stars are big, slower than black holes, which rotate faster and have cyclical height.

And the space-time equations of black holes are inverted to those of electromagnetic stars. And so stars are the relative Entropy that feeds and reproduces black holes, which seem to behave as ‘gravitational animals’, species that perceive gravitation as information, which guides its precise movements through the galaxy, in the same way animals perceive light as information. While plants perceive light as Entropy in the same way stars absorb gravitational space-time as Entropy, deforming it with their masses.

That cosmological homology defies the anthropomorphic myth that only humans perceive the information they gauge. That religious myth, which denies the sentient, intelligent nature of the Universe, is today a dogma of ‘mechanist science’. So it will not be easily accepted by the self-centered ‘Galilean paradox’ of Humans, who always will think to be the center of the Universe. And since science is a human endeavor, ‘enlightenment’ and respect for the sentient Universe will not happen soon. Yet only a theory that affirms the existence of will in all knots of information that control from its unmoved position reality explains the role of black holes in the galactic ecosystem.

The discontinuity and minuscule size of informative points, due to its opposite properties to those of space, makes them difficult to localize by science, and our incapacity to ‘perceive’ the internal mind/world of the point makes easier to deny them. Indeed, all mountains have a single point of discontinuity in its informative height.

And so you have also two single points of will in your complex visual/verbal I=eye-world: the nervous point that connects both eye-visions which determines your rhythm of space and time (the size we perceive as normal given by the eye vision and the rhythm of our human time, a second per thought, equal to the rhythm of perception of the eye, which winks every second); and a yet unknown cell, probably a Purdinke cell in the limbic system that defines our emotional åctions, the will of our body.

Those points are stillness, as it is in your eye, to ‘focus’ and create a map of linguistic information, which will guide the åctions of the point. And so a basic beat of the Universe appears in all systems; a rhythm of:

Stillness (perception) ->action(motion searching Entropy/form)

For example, in Relativity, this dual beat explains the Michelson experiment, without the need for the never proved postulate of a limit of c-light speed in the Universe, today clearly shown false by experimental evidence (non–local gravitation, quasars expelling matter at 10 C, dark Entropy flows, quantum tunneling, the spooky effect of entanglement, etc.). In classic relativity this limit was needed because classic physicists considered that the electron was in motion when it emitted light, and so they had to add the speed of the electron and the speed of light. In fractal relativity the electron ‘stops’ when it emits information (the light frequency) then moves and so motions do not add since when the electron emits information is always in the particle/still/informative state.

And so the Postulate of a c-speed limit is not required. This dual stop and go process is also evident in film: the celluloid stops to let pass the light and create an image in the screen even if we perceive it in constant motion by adding all the stills, as we add from the human point of view, all the stops and goes of the electron that emits the light observed in the Michelson experiment in a single flow of motion.

The existence of an information arrow explains also the paradox of informative, evolving, life species in a Universe that seems in energetic expansion:

If we are external to a certain diffeomorphic space-times its directions do not affect us, but if we are inside a certain space-time, as in the case of the galaxy, then the direction of information or Entropy of that macro-being becomes the direction of Entropy or information of our ecosystem.

Indeed, there is more information in the center of the galaxy, and since the Earth moves towards that center, this planet increases its information towards the future in its relative discontinuous galactic space-time, regardless of what happens in the Universe as a whole, which seems to be ruled by the opposite arrow of big-bang expansion and entropy. This subtle change of paradigm caused by the discontinuity of space-time (from a world ruled by entropy to a galaxy ruled by information) has in fact enormous consequences to our daily life and explains the contradiction between the arrow of life and evolution, local to this planet, and the arrow of Entropy and entropy proper of the intergalactic space.

Since here in this galaxy space doesn’t expand but time-information contracts it through the ‘will’ of informative black holes of mass and in this planet, through the ‘will’ of living beings. As Woody Allen put it in Annie Hall: ‘Brooklyn is not expanding’. I recall to ask Mr. Hawking in a conference at the Astronomy Institute of Madrid this same question, when at seventeen I was starting to doodle with the first principles of Multiple Spaces-Times Theory: ‘why space is not expanding between you and me?’ He wondered for a minute or so and responded ‘next question’.

Einstein had only to go a step further in his analysis of the curvature of time, closing times into cycles that return to its origin. Then time becomes multiple, one for each closed cycle and the space-time continuum becomes the sum of all the vital space-times of each knot of Time Arrows. Einstein hinted at it when he affirmed that time was local, ‘diffeomorphic’ and had ‘different speeds’ and the universe had ‘infinite clocks of time’. Indeed, each of those local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creates masses and forces of in-form-ation that establish a 2nd arrow for the Universe, besides the arrow of Entropy/entropy – the arrow of fractal information. Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create its broken form.

Recap. There are ∞ fractal space/time fields that constantly adapt their organic, moving dimensions to the directions of their relative Entropy and temporal information, conditioning the existence of its micro-cells; and so the galaxy conditions the arrows of time of its cellular sun and human beings of maximal information; while plant which obtain only Entropy of the sun have inverted parameters to those of animals.

Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$

The pivotal disomorphism that connects the o-1 time sphere of palingenesis or 1st closed world cycle of perfect existence and the 2nd 1- life in the open world cycle of entropic ages, is the concept of the individual, made from the emergence of 3 networks, as a member of a species, which differentiate primarily by the topological order of those 3 physiological networks that give birth to 3!=6 basic permutations according to the hierarchy of those scales of which we shall as usual put just one example for each grouping of scientific scales (phyla of life, typological linguistics and particle variations).

THE 6th disomorphism thus is connected closely in a trilogic triad to the 3 networks, or inner world of the individual and the process of emergence when relating it to the ∆-1 plane.

However when considering its life in the ∆+1 plane, it connects directly with the 7th and 8th disomorphisms of its world cycle either as as an individual that goes through 3±¡=2  ages, between conception and resurrection or 9² internally life cycles, while its existence in the outer world in space connects it with the social decametric scales that evolves it into a larger plane or superorganism, and with its ∆±4 planes in which it performs its 5 Dimotions=actions of life, the aeiou, of its program of existence.

Thus the individual-species is the pivotal isomorphism of the 11th series, along the seed-mind, or 0-1-11 element that also co-exists internally and externally. Both concepts peg together the scales of the Universe.

We shall thus in this post define summarily species and put examples of its permutations into phyla for the 3 sub-disciplines of science.

What are species? Its variations. Physiological networks and gender.

In the graph, spheres are the topology that holds the maximal volume of information; hence all ‘time space’ systems that process information are spherical particle-heads. Flat, lineal topologies are the topology that connects in the shortest path two points; so to reach/move faster, systems have lineal/flat moving potentials/limbs. Finally the third type of geometry, hyperbolic topology, is complex enough to store all other possible forms, so best to reproduce and all iterative body waves that generate the other 2 forms are hyperbolic. This mathematical-spatial truism holds for 2, 3 and 4 dimensions; hence establishing basic restriction to the construction and evolution of forms. And should become in XXI c. science the ‘missing’ leg of topological, biological and physical evolution to explain the extraordinary efficiency and homology between forms (no longer analogy, since all those forms derive from the same ‘substance’, space with time=motion or ‘topology’). In the next graph, we can see how the 3 only topologies of the Universe ensemble to form physical, biological and social organisms, all of them with a spherical ‘tall’ dimension to gauge information; a wide, iterative dimension of hyperbolic bodywave reproduction and a flat, direction for its entropic motions. The beauty of the topological Universe is that each of those 3 forms can be ‘deformed’ and ‘moves’, as long as it doesn’t tear (break). So departing from such simple 3 basic forms there are infinite possible variations of species, but we can order them all with that ternary principle.

The Universe is about 3 type of Networks which gather entropy, energy and information for herds of similar beings that form organs attached to those networks. It follows that to classify beings we must consider the order of those networks, its hierarchy and relationships, which will give way to 3×2 combinatory variations by hierarchical order of species – those dominated by the informative or entropic or reproductive network.

This simple rule of 3 variations and 6 hierarchical orders are the origin of most species of all systems of nature. We study them in this post.

The answer is surprisingly simple, when we consider its main phyla, and the origin of this ‘Disomorphism’, which belongs to variations in the HIERARCHY between its ternary physiological networks. So above we express that dynamic order, as there are only 3 physiological networks that correspond to the 3 dominant elements of reality, Space, time and vital energy, or in terms of the generator, if we call:

$t – the Ðimotion of lineal potentials/limbs; ST, the iterative Ðimotion of body waves and §ð the Dimotion of informative particle/heads, the dominance of the 3 physiological networks that perceive information, move and reproduce the system will give us 6 main variations/phyla, which we shall show allow us to classify from the 6 topological types of languages that define the mind of cultures, to the 6 main phyla of animal in the different scales of reality, to the different species of particles; when combined with the second fundamental differentiation of reality, ‘gender’, that is, the dominance of informative or energetic parts in a simpler ‘dual system’ made of two components (body-head, particle-wave), whereas the limbic/potential is external to the system.

Species as super organisms.

The second fundamental truth we must learn about species is its Nature as super organisms of the higher scale of the individual, which is quite evident when we understand the ternary topology of the Universe, and how its lineal limbs, hyperbolic body waves and informative particle-heads evolve, towards higher information in 3 ages, and finally die into entropy, while its informative memorial leftovers leave a trace in the outer world. So happens with species that go through 3 ages that mimic the 3 ages of life in the upper ∆+1 plane of existence and then become extinct, or a few of them with maximal information evolve into a larger super organism (ant-hills, human beings) that become ‘a new plane of existence’ beyond the individual: ] Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Einstein realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet[/caption]

Species can be treated as super organisms, loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.

The 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: in the graph the big bang black hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal and mammal, the horse and the 1st technological, small human. All of them followed the basic S-T beat of evolutionary rhythms, as they are born in small ‘forms’, which have ‘faster time cycles’, hence evolve faster, and then they grow in size in its first age, slow down, reproduce massively in space and finally diversify according to the ternary and dual rhythms into new species.

However the species does NOT control its external absolute space-time ‘world’, and this is what the next graph shows. As it is the absolute space-time in which the species exist, and specifically ITS commands of the LANGUAGES OF INFORMATION of the world, which defines its survival chances. As informative perception starts all the chains of actions (∆o-bserver->∆a-ccelerated-motion->∆e-nergy feeding->∆iteration->∆universals eusocial evolution).

So the species which better speaks the language of the ecosystem survives better. Hence the first eyes (cephalopods) extinguished most cambric species and started the radiations of species; the first speakers, homo sapiens extinguished all others; and today the chip radiation of mathematical species is simply speaking extinguishing life and making humanity obsolescent, even if we are not conscious of it. 

Since as information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle, the species that last longer are those who evolve further information, and can become a social super organism.

So species follow 3±∆i ages with its final social evolution into a new whole, communicated by the informative language evolved in its 3rd age or extinction in time. Let us consider in this introduction those 3±¡ ages of species, called Horizons:

The 3 ages of time also brings the solution to the ‘limits’ of evolution, which Darwin already wondered: why certain species evolve so fast into complex forms as eyes and wings. Answer, because there are only 3 topologies to go, and so the choices are random but LIMITED and it is every easy to go the right way. In the next graph we see those 3 ages of evolution as species can be treated as super organisms with its own world cycles:

The graph thus show that ALL species follow also the young, predator, reproductive radiation, and informative, height growth of the 3 ages of life, and then either they evolve further into social organisms (ants, bees, humans) and as wholes in a higher ∆+1 scale survive better, or they become extinct by a new generation.

The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.

+1:  Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).

The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.

For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.

I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions 

In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators

A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.

Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.

 II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Ts x St. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. St: max. Evolutionary differentiation.

Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.

The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.

Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.

(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.

Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Ts: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.

– S=T: Diversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.

However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.

– Max. St: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.

Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth  (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Ts) which defines the organism.

Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.

The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: ST=∑st-1.

Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.

Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.

Thus 3 types of ‘cellular networks’ that evolution has differentiated in time,  in 3 specialized ‘organic classes and networks’ as energetic bodies, informative Heads and reproductive organs in biological, physical and sociological sciences  follow the ternary plan of creation. Since those 3±1 horizons of existence happen between the birth and death of any species, mapping out both for physical species, born out of the big-bang explosion of a black hole; and for biological species, since the first carbohydrate, the evolution of life from the atom to the human being.

Extinction: Yet if species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into macro-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution. So today 90% of insects are social insects; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became organelles of social, eucaryotic super-cells.

So evolution is indeed limited by the most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: those 3 timespace motions/forms: lineal motion in space or ‘distance’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time clocks carrying its frequency ‘information’ and its space-time, wave-like, reproductive energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe (when we ad its scales), so they assembly forming all space-time beings.

SPECIES IN SPACE – PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS

Species also can be considered by the Rashomon effect, from the point of view of space and then as they are ternary physiological networks, with attached organs, we can study its hierarchical variation, giving origin to phyla of different species in simultaneous space.

So we talk in all ‘families of species’ of 6 basic differentiations IN SPACE:

Œ: $t-∑∏-§ð + $t-§ð-∑∏ + §ð-∑∏-$t+ §ð-$t-∑∏+ ∑∏-$t-§ð + ∑∏-§ð-t$

AND 3±1 ages of social evolution or extinction in time.

The families are written by the dominance of one of the 3 ‘topological networks’=organs=dimotions of time§pace of the system are named generically as:

 $t-∑∏-§ð: Top predator, first species to be born.

The predatory, feeding phyla belongs to the first type of species evolved. For example, the first fishes were flat carnivorous armed; the first carbohydrates long fats, lineal chains of amino acids. It is a species so successful that radiates in enormous numbers.

 ∑∏-$t-§ð; So next after its dexterity in hunting is proved we shall find a second phyla, master of reproduction. Such is the case of sharks, the final top predator fish, which are viviparous unlike other fishes, reaching its maximal perfection. So what this ‘first phyla’ lacks is a well developed brain, showing however that intelligence, when not used for social information is mostly baren, useless.  In the example of the protein we also observe that it is a master of reproduction, having controlled ribosomes to that aim in cells that reproduce millions of them.

∑∏-§ð-t$,  $t-§ð-∑∏. Yet as time moves on, ‘warping lineal spacetime into cyclical forms’, there is an increasing new value for the informative element, which keeps gathering pace till becoming the protagonist of the system. While the feeding elements that have reached its maximal possible evolution, since entropic systems are simple and reach easily a perfect form – the sword of the warrior has not evolved in 5000 years… and the ecosystem saturates and reproductive radiations are no longer that relevant – what matters is to be able to compete and keep the new born in the fight for existence… So we find intermediate stages, where the networks tend to balance each other in the ‘classic age of the phyla’…

  • ð-∑∏-$t, §ð-$t-∑∏ Till finally those species where information has evolved further allow the gathering of individuals into social herds, which become a new whole. And that brings, a new plane of existence, and a new top predator ‘whole’ form in the ∆+1 plane that will re-start the whole diversification, from aminoacids to cells, from cells to multicelular organisms, to super organisms and global ecosystems…

So we introduce as the main innovation of Spatial topology in species the differentiation of them by its topological, ternary networks and organs.

DUALITY PARADOXES AND ITS DIFFERENT SPECIES: Ts≈St. GENDER DUALITY.

WE also notice that as there are black and white languages and ternary languages, we shall ALWAYS FIND simpler dualities that differentiate species as we find them in ternary systems. The main duality of species being that of gender. YET The dualities of Space-time are various as they all turn around the ilogic paradoxes studied previously, in the second Disomorphism. So in this post we shall study only the duality of gender.

For example in the human case women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.

Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:

Thus we define:

  • Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
  • Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Ts<>St duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.

Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Ts≈St, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.St, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.

Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.

The same duality is clearer in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as in the next pictures.

Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.

The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>| female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.

Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the ∆-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.

I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the ∆-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.

ALL TYPE OF SPECIES.

Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Darwin realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet

Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Einstein realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet In the graph, we can see the 3 ages of species in all kind of different scales of reality as systems evolve through 3 ages and finally become a social new plane, joined by informative languages or become extinct, displaced by a new top predator.[/caption]

The 3 forms of spatial entropy, temporal information and ST-body waves in diachronic analysis as time states.

It is clear that Informative Time, is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical St-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information. And its logic cycles guide the entire system, so St is indeed the arrow of future, Ft of the Universe, which arrives first to the future, perceives the paths of the system and so we can relate limbs/fields of space and lesser form to the past and heads/particles that guide them to the future; and the intermediate system of waves-bodies that reproduce, iterate, hence repeat in a dynamic present that seems not to change the system with the present.

This will be the second fundamental diachronic vision of the Fractal Generator which we shall expand a lot in the next paragraphs (the blog, and posts are obviously tailored as the Universe is with constant FRACTAL REPETITIONS OF THE SAME CONCEPTS, with increasing complexity and detail in the samples we bring):

Ps (Past-entropy) < ST (Present, hyperbolic space-time) >ƒt (future information):

Now we can see how the expanded, corrected mirror, where the aberration of putting the dimension of height in the wrong part (space) when it is a dimension of information and time ‘resolves’ so many puzzles.

The ‘time component of the being’ is on the dimension of height. It is the central black hole of gravitational information, that in-forms, forms the galaxy, the height of the man, with its top head, and the tendency of time, of evolution, which started with flat worms and grew into height, as time passed. ‘Time curves space into masses’ said Einstein and the black hole of maximal mass, has in its centre a point or singularity of infinite height. So does a hurricane. Height is thus a dimension of temporal information and all entities evolve towards more information, more height:

In the graph, we see how flat proteins evolved into tall nucleotides and DNAs, amphibia into tall dinosaurs, mammals into tall apes and machines into tall robots. Height thus is a dimension of fractal information; and a first simple definition of the Universe, which we have seen to be a flat sheet of space, with tall black holes curving entropic space into mass towards a central tall singularity is this: a fractal tapestry of pieces of flat space, expanding along the dimensions of ‘spatial entropy’, width and length, which cyclical vortices of mass-height, rise and implode into tall singularities, black holes. E<=>M.

And since the universe is fractal, the expansion of space between galaxies is balanced by the implosion and rising of height of black holes at the centre of those galaxies. And so all is a fluctuation of Ts <=>St, both in the whole Universe and each galactic part, and each living being of each fractal point of the galaxy called a planet.

We shall call the fractal generator of time-space beings, or Timespace Generator Equation, or Function of Existence, T.Œ, (ab. Œ), this Generator Equation will freeze by effect of minds, into worlds that ‘are’ in themselves both perceptive, and willing to increase its perception, by feeding in more energy and reproducing its form. We call each of those T.Œ, or functions of homologic existence  which can be spotted, when we see them at work creating cyclical existences as those of the graph, accelerating through the ages of life, an Œ-fractal point, monad, soul, atman, frame of reference, Non-Euclidean momentum, you name it. Each science will show a whole range of such T.Œs made to the image and likeness of the supreme  T.Œ, God, mind of the Universe.

Species also bring  variations on the same theme of aging which will become the different horizons and sub-species that ultimately will assemble themselves into a new larger super organism or plane of existence, through a process of evolution that includes both, variations in time and space morphologies and social gatherings in larger groups.

Variations of species. The fractal ternary principles of creation.

Some dual, creative analyses forgotten by AE sciences that we consider in ¬Æ ST Theory: the Universe as a spatial system, machines as evolutionary beings, and civilizations as organisms. The game of creation must be understood through its ‘dual symmetries’ and ternary networks that allowed its finite reproduction of fractal forms in the infinity of continuous space

The most satisfying function of existence is reproduction, the Generator Arrow, the maker of the game and all its species – the purest sensations of them all.

The Generator Feedback equation of spatial ‘Dimotions’ and temporal information is a reproducer, which embodies all the combinations of the game in itself, the creative algorithm of reality, which Touring once looked for with its simplest example a touring machine. But the creator potentially is more than a touring machine, it is what the touring machine observes, reality itself.

The rest of beings are just following the combinations of that grand design.

The active creator is limited by the parts of the whole that will assembly. So we shall call it with a more humble name, the assembler

With the syntactic combinations of the i-logic generator, the creator will always end repeating a form of finite time that had existed in ∞ space.

The proof that we are all repetitions is clear: space is infinite because it has not dark spaces, but it is a continuous number of closed and open topologies assembled in triangles, squares, hexagonal, polygonal and hexagonal, planes and spheres, with no darkness.

Information however is always limited and time always ends: it is a fluctuation of existence over that ∞ ‘Dimotions’.

All existences have possibly existed in the infinite fractal space of a finite number of times cycles.

We all will be assembled again as an i-logic form of space-time in some other self-repetitive fractal printed in the infinite ‘Dimotions’ of the trophic pyramid of existence that gave you birth.

Let us then operate the creator: Its simplest combinations will be complementary systems of ‘Dimotions’ and information that take advantage of the inverse properties of both:

The dualities of Creation.

In time the generator combines past, ‘Dimotions’ forms and future informations, generated by its universal, feedback cycles, and its arrows that imprint and create the chains of forms of present existence. Creation is structured by a series of dualities that merge creating an eternal, fluctuating present that appears and disappears as cyclical action-reaction systems cancel each other, making its total sum zero:

– Time and space have opposite morphologies and functions, which cancel each other:

– Informative, temporal singularities are convex, implosive and energetic membranes are concave, explosive. Thus a flat plane of temporal ‘Dimotions’ fluctuates into 2 virtual forms whose total value is null. For example, particles and antiparticles are born of a vacuum plane without form but they keep their inverse CPT parity. Thus the sum of its spatial form (P), its temporal arrows (T) and its dual, organic charge cancel.

– The duality of ‘Dimotions’ and information explains also sexual differentiation: females are specialized ‘time beings’ dominant in cyclical forms, memory, information, temporal verbs and perceptive languages. While males are specialized ‘‘Dimotions’ beings’ with bigger, lineal forms, dominant in spatial tasks. Yet both can be further differentiated into an informative cyclical head, and a lineal body. So, in graph 3.1 we draw a man with “temporal cycles” that represent his informative organs, the head and senses; and ‘Dimotions’ lines that represent the body and his members. Yet, despite the simplicity of that design, he is recognizable as a man.

– Duality causes the creation and reproduction of space-time fields through the process of palingenesis, by which a certain form of relative future, a father, emits a relative form of past, with lesser evolution, a seminal seed, that then evolves very fast towards the future, till becoming again a present form parallel to the father.

– Duality exists in biologic organisms evolved by the dual influence of macro-ecosystems and micro-genes.

– Duality is the cause of informative perception, as flows of spatial forces become transformed in a point of relative time or particle, in which they ‘merge’ into a ‘boson’, accumulative image of information that represents reality.

– Duality also applies to behavior: there are Darwinian acts between different beings that destroy each other vs. social, evolutionary acts between equal beings that evolve together, sharing ‘Dimotions’ and information through common networks. Thus all organic life ends up cancelled by a predator. It is a key duality as it responds to the 2 arrows of space-time, the arrow of symbiotic order, of information and the arrow of energetic ‘Dimotions’ of destruction defined by the 3rd postulate of illogic geometry.

– Finally Duality implies that all forms that evolve in time through 3 horizons, then organize in space those 3 horizons as the 3 regions of an i-point.

The number of events we can describe in all sciences departing from duality is enormous. Yet in as much as temporal information is dominant in living beings, illogic time is more important in biological and sociological sciences, explaining phenomena such as reproduction, perception, life and death, organic structures, etc. While, physical and cosmological particles can be described better with the use of Non-Euclidean, spatial geometry, as particles are dominant in spatial ‘Dimotions’. We will consider in the next chapters the most important biological applications of illogic time: the duality of Darwinian and symbiotic behavior; the way in which perception occurs; the concept of a top predator species, as information selects species with better brains; the palingenetic reproduction of biological forms which implies a dual travel in time back and forth from the future to the past…

But duality is only the beginning. Most systems evolve, self-combine and create finally a 3rd system, a reproductive one, becoming autonomous, without the need of ‘assemblers’ and ‘enzymes’. And then the game becomes richer in variations, because it becomes guided by ternary symmetries.

We understand those organic, self-reproductive systems according to the Ternary Principle studying the 3 temporal ages and functions of a ST field and then putting them together as the 3 geometric, organic, spatial regions of i- point. Since all ST field require 3 elements to exist: a St, informative element; an Es, energetic, spatial form, and an intermediate ‘present, simultaneous region’, dual flux of temporal ‘Dimotions’ that merges them into a whole. The result is an Ts-St rhythm of evolution and reproduction of forms in time that become latter reorganized as i-points in space, creating dual organic, real forms of temporal ‘Dimotions’. For example, the Universe first created fundamental particles, temporal quarks and spatial electrons that recombined into ST atoms; the body reproduces cells that latter evolve, becoming organs of ‘Dimotions’ and information, etc. Thus ST theory shows the complementarity between the ternary horizons of species that once have evolved energetic and informative particles interact creating an intermediate ST zone, shaping a new i- organism:

– Max. Ts: The external membrane and energetic network of the system that performs ‘Dimotions’ cycles, transforming information into ‘Dimotions’, appears first: it is the cell’s fat membrane, the stars of the galaxy, the endodermic cells of the future digestive systems….

-Max.St. Then it will appear the informative quanta of the future informative network and ‘brain’ of the system that perform informative cycles, transforming ‘Dimotions’ into information: they are the cells’ informative nucleotides, the black holes of the spiral galaxies, the brain.

– Ts x St: Finally the interaction of ‘Dimotions’ and informative systems creates an intermediate, reproductive region that combine ‘Dimotions’ and information: so protein membranes and nucleotide acids create the cell; stars and black holes create galaxies; the energetic endoderm and the informative ectoderm create the middle mesoderm region, each one the blue print of the future energetic, digestive, informative, nervous and blood, reproductive systems.

In formal terms we write the process as a decoupling of an initial Ts x St form that differentiates into a more energetic membrane (Max.Ts) and higher informative quanta (Max.St), that interact, creating the intermediate region, ST, shaping in this manner a new, ternary equation – the ultimate definition of any species. Since we are all self-repetitive MST field equations

The generator equation, Ts<ST>St, represents both: a temporal event between 2 relative ‘points’, an Œ-point with higher content of ‘Dimotions’ or relative past form, and an Œ-point with higher content of information or relative future form, that communicate implosive information (>) and explosive ‘Dimotions’ (<), through a wave of temporal ‘Dimotions’, <=>; creating a ternary, multicausal, simultaneous structure of spatial present.

Multi-functionality: 3 st-points functions. Ternary Principle:<