Home » ·-2¥ » 3±¡ organic scales

# 3±¡ organic scales

SUMMARY:

Electronic Light in fractal space.

Realist interpretation of quantum physics.

¡+1: Social ¥e: electromagnetism.

## REALIST INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM PHYSICS

‘Quantum mechanics will ultimately be cast as statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein

HOW THIS can be done, has to do with the fact that all equations of the o-1 probabilistic time sphere are by Theory of Measure equivalent to statistic populations in the 1-∞ plane. As we have said ad nauseam on our articles on 5D generation in an ∆-1 plane what this means is that both formalisms are equal, but we better use the time-fast probabilistic formalism according to 5D metric; Space size x Time Speed=Constant, for very small particles, (quantum), because we SEE them as ‘blocks of time’, that is so fast in its worldcycles, that the worldcycles ruled by probabilistic time equations freeze as space populations.  While in the larger thermodynamic scale, which we can assess and measure as populations, developing thermodynamic slower worldcycles, the 1-∞ plane works ok. Both are equivalent.

So we accept both formalisms, but what we are interested in this blog of philosophy of science is to extract meanings, straighten interpretations and introduce ad ons learned from 5D. So in brief:

5D particle generation  (unit time sphere probabilistic): quantum formalism ≈ 1-∞: atomic statistical populations: Thermodyamics

The argument on probability and determinism.

“The analogue in classical optics. One can speak of the beam diffracted by a grating in a given direction only if the grating and the incident wave are laterally limited, because otherwise all the diffracted beams will overlap and be bathed in the incident wave. One must also assume the wave Ψ to be limited laterally in configuration space. The question is to know what a particle should do when it is immersed in two waves at the same time.”

BROGLIE

Humans in the ‘visual age’, believe truth is e-vidence, forgetting the laws of causality and information that ‘set up’ the paths of future of all systems. Hence they will dismiss the higher learning of this blog, as you cannot take still pictures of time causality and its I-logic postulates. They prefer to reduce knowledge to present pics and digital equations (: So the deterministic causality of past to future repetitive cyclical patterns or laws of stience seem impossible to them, unless obtained through statistical methods ‘after it has happened’ (quantum method). The realist pilot-wave right theory  instead shows  future patterns can be found before  they happen.

The quantum world as huminds perceive it is the o-1 probability sphere of time world cycles≈ paths of a whole game of existence between the o-seed and the 1-generation as a larger being of a higher ∆+1 scale, expressed specifically as the ∑ ∆–1 waves of Bosonic forces > ∆º  particles.

Since the Universe is completely understandable, predictable, organic, deterministic as any life-death cycle is.

The trick here though comes when we fully grasp one of the most beautiful dualities of reality – that between the short steps of open strings/lineal momentums/free particles, which statistically as the number of events in the o-1 sphere GROW (or the populations in the identical, ∆+1 scale of the 1-∞ plane), the mass program ‘gravitates’ towards an organic building of a deterministic ‘enclosed whole’, which becomes curved into closed, fixed geodesics – fully deterministic larger wholes with an integral single worldcycle.

It is then possible to integrate also the kaleidoscopic mirrors of quantum probabilistic physics and Bohmian paths; and also consider local big-bangs of quasar galaxies, which are free to die but NOT the whole Universe that will perform at best in the upper scale a zero sum worldcycle…

That is, in quantum physics, all the open paths of a wave collapse in a deterministic Bohmian path of the particle, all the entropic molecules of heat, collapse into the deterministic larger thermodynamic whole laws, all the individual free lives of human beings, collapse into the deterministic life and death cycles of its organisms, nations and civilizations, and those larger whole, closed cycles is what becomes determined.

The parts seem free, the whole, the mass is bent, closed, deterministic. So in geometry, Lobachevski found that we see in small distances as you see the earth flat, open space, but when the picture gets longer and bigger in time and space, the mass of steps and events or populations gravitate and curve. In the complex plane as Gauss already proved, there are multiple integral paths but we come always back to the same point. In physics light crosss through the least time path.

The parts will feel always in their plane of existence, free, because they cannot perceive the whole; as you don’t see yourself part of an organism of history, your DNA cells won’t feel to be part of a brain-controlled organism, whose informative nervous messages made them move in synchronicity and their hormonal blood flows order their re=production actions. Or the stars of the galaxy feeding in gravitational paths will not see the black hole swarm in the center that will swallow them all at the end of times.

Cyclical time is predictable as cycles of information reproduce & r=evolve with the same topological patterns.

And this bring us to an error of quantum physicists in its misinterpretations of his mathematical equations; and rejection for a century and counting of the true proper interpretation of their discipline, Broglie’s>Bohm>Bell’s deterministic quantum-pilot wave theory, Pilot-waves are a perfect, rational, deterministic, 5D theory of quantum physics, born of the founding fathers of the discipline, Broglie and Einstein, denied by the Huge Ego paradox of the Hilbert School of Germanic idealism (which considers that humans ‘imagine’ points, planes and maths, the language of God, they only share, and hence they also ‘imagine’ physical particles, as per Bohr, Born and Heisenberg),

One thing though must be clarified – Einstein’s postulate of c-speed limit, obviously apply only to the plane of continuous space-time light, as it is the background spacetime of our perceived universe, of electronic eyes feeding on light; but there must be according to 5D metric, S x T = K, a lower faster than c ‘gravitational’ scale of intergalactic space, the quantum potential of entanglement and Bohm’s model, of gravitational action at distance, of intergalactic jets at 10C, of the gravitational accelerated vortex of black holes, beyond the c-horizon (Kerr metric), which expels perpendicularly those jets, and cause the effect of expansive dark entropy space faster than light space, exactly where light does NOT exist.

So the key to fully grasp both quantum physics and the balanced immortal big-bang/warping Universe was indeed to consider c-speed and 4D metric, the ‘limit’ for a single plane of space-time of 5D metric.   Einstein’s postulate of c-speed, works only for the lowest perceived scale of reality that builds up the electronic mind – light space-time itself, which is only the cartesian world of light space-time huminds are, but there are undoubtedly many other mind-worlds with different pixels at different speeds – the slower atomic, smelling worlds of elephants, with its higher memorial, slow past pixels, the faster top quark, gravitational minds of black holes, informative ‘dna-like’ brains of ‘galacells.

Once this ‘hidden scale’ is added to the models of the balanced Universe the obvious truths of the Broglie>Bohm ‘realist model’ of quantum physics impose its logic.

And yet by the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple perspectives, each of the ‘different perspectives on quantum physics’ has a quantity of truth.

What is then the zone of conflict between both perspectives?

• An important question which is by no means settled is to consider which of both perspectives does properly calculate the existence of the particle before it touches the observer’s apparatus.

It is not clear if the particle exists before, in the scattered wave or collapses becoming such in response to the ‘attack’ or ‘well’ of energy of the observer.

And this is an uncertainty that cannot be solved because we are looking to the ‘limit’ of our perception as electronic atomic instruments.

Probability v. determinism.

The quantum world as huminds perceive it is the o-1 probability sphere of time world cycles≈ paths of a whole game of existence between the o-seed and the 1-generation as a larger being of a higher ∆+1 scale, expressed specifically as the ∑ ∆–1 waves of Bosonic forces > ∆º  particles.

Since the Universe is completely understandable, predictable, organic, deterministic as any life-death cycle is.

The trick here though comes when we fully grasp one of the most beautiful dualities of reality – that between the short steps of open strings/lineal momentums/free particles, which statistically as the number of events in the o-1 sphere GROW (or the populations in the identical, ∆+1 scale of the 1-∞ plane), the mass program ‘gravitates’ towards an organic building of a deterministic ‘enclosed whole’, which becomes curved into closed, fixed geodesics – fully deterministic larger wholes with an integral single worldcycle.

It is then possible to integrate also the kaleidoscopic mirrors of quantum probabilistic physics and Bohmian paths; and also consider local big-bangs of quasar galaxies, which are free to die but NOT the whole Universe that will perform at best in the upper scale a zero sum worldcycle…

That is, in quantum physics, all the open paths of a wave collapse in a deterministic Bohmian path of the particle, all the entropic molecules of heat, collapse into the deterministic larger thermodynamic whole laws, all the individual free lives of human beings, collapse into the deterministic life and death cycles of its organisms, nations and civilizations, and those larger whole, closed cycles is what becomes determined.

The parts seem free, the whole, the mass is bent, closed, deterministic. So in geometry, Lobachevski found that we see in small distances as you see the earth flat, open space, but when the picture gets longer and bigger in time and space, the mass of steps and events or populations gravitate and curve. In the complex plane as Gauss already proved, there are multiple integral paths but we come always back to the same point. In physics light crosss through the least time path.

The parts will feel always in their plane of existence, free, because they cannot perceive the whole; as you don’t see yourself part of an organism of history, your DNA cells won’t feel to be part of a brain-controlled organism, whose informative nervous messages made them move in synchronicity and their hormonal blood flows order their re=production actions. Or the stars of the galaxy feeding in gravitational paths will not see the black hole swarm in the center that will swallow them all at the end of times.

Cyclical time is predictable as cycles of information reproduce & r=evolve with the same topological patterns.

And this bring us to an error of quantum physicists in its misinterpretations of his mathematical equations; and rejection for a century and counting of the true proper interpretation of their discipline, Broglie’s>Bohm>Bell’s deterministic quantum-pilot wave theory, Pilot-waves aRE a perfect, rational, deterministic, 5D theory of quantum physics, born of the founding fathers of the discipline, Broglie and Einstein, denied by the Huge Ego paradox of the Hilbert School of Germanic idealism (which considers that humans ‘imagine’ points, planes and maths, the language of God, they only share, and hence they also ‘imagine’ physical particles, as per Bohr, Born and Heisenberg),

One thing though must be clarified – Einstein’s postulate of c-speed limit, obviously apply only to the plane of continuous space-time light, as it is the background spacetime of our perceived universe, of electronic eyes feeding on light; but there must be according to 5D metric, S x T = K, a lower faster than c ‘gravitational’ scale of intergalactic space, the quantum potential of entanglement and Bohm’s model, of gravitational action at distance, of intergalactic jets at 10C, of the gravitational accelerated vortex of black holes, beyond the c-horizon (Kerr metric), which expels perpendicularly those jets, and cause the effect of expansive dark entropy space faster than light space, exactly where light does NOT exist.

So the key to fully grasp both quantum physics and the balanced immortal big-bang/warping Universe was indeed to consider c-speed and 4D metric, the ‘limit’ for a single plane of space-time of 5D metric.   Einstein’s postulate of c-speed, works only for the lowest perceived scale of reality that builds up the electronic mind – light space-time itself, which is only the cartesian world of light space-time huminds are, but there are undoubtedly many other mind-worlds with different pixels at different speeds – the slower atomic, smelling worlds of elephants, with its higher memorial, slow past pixels, the faster top quark, gravitational minds of black holes, informative ‘dna-like’ brains of ‘galacells.

Once this ‘hidden scale’ is added to the models of the balanced Universe the obvious truths of the Broglie>Bohm ‘realist model’ of quantum physics impose its logic.

And yet by the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple perspectives, each of the ‘different perspectives on quantum physics’ has a quantity of truth.

What is then the zone of conflict between both perspectives?

• An important question which is by no means settled is to consider which of both perspectives does properly calculate the existence of the particle before it touches the observer’s apparatus.

It is not clear if the particle exists before, in the scattered wave or collapses becoming such in response to the ‘attack’ or ‘well’ of energy of the observer.

How the ‘general S x T = K’ EQUATION of 5D metric works out for different systems though must take into account the different power laws that apply too them.

In generala more precise metric equation for physics systems will be considering the different dimensions of Space=volume (3D), time (clock: 2D) and K (scalar = 1D), our Unification equation of charges and masses, where we write  in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

UCG,C = ω2r3/MUCG,C x M= ω2r3   M= ω2r3/UCG,C

Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and  charges).

Indeed Mass becomes then the ‘relative constant’ M= ð(ω²) x $(r³), we are in a power law which is essentially similar to Kepler’s 3rd law. Couldn’t be otherwise: T² ≈ R³. So T=1/w and we substitute, normalizing as a constant each relative mass of each quark, M = 1; proportional to the square of its angular speed. We can look at it in terms of dimensionalities, M, is the one dimensional scalar-singularity, w is the 2 Dimensional angular enclosure and r is the 3-dimensional quantum potential vital energy of the system – the lineal enclosed ‘wave’ state of this potential invisible field .So the equation becomes dimensional: K (1D) = ð² x$³, which merely defines the growth of mass as a power law of  the speed of rotation and potential invisible field (distance-radius). This is Kepler’s law and in general it will be the law for all physical systems; but requiring for each scale a proper analysis of the dimensions in which we work, which are maximal obviously for the macro-gravitational scale, but might differ – and we shall see how, for lower scales.

So here we do have an M vs. r³ clear one thousand relationship, between the scalar (charge, Mass, h, M) and the potential (quantum likely gravitational potential  10.000 C field, faster than light for spooky action at distance, maybe mediated by ‘string neutrinos’  electromagnetic field for our Universe at maximal c-speed, a thermodynamic potential for molecules and a liquid flow potential and so on). which would make logic to consider the rotational speed of the electron and the proton equal.

Complex calculations  theoretically should put together all this: neutrinos, strings, gravitons, spooky entanglement, top quarks, black hole jets, neutrino theory of light, dark entropy, death of tired redshift light, expansion of space…

So good luck to the XXI century physicist that puts them all. All I know is that is the way shown by the theoretical analysis from a 5D perspective.

We are though now more interested to straighten up the huge gaps on theoretical terms on the meaning of those constants (3rd graph to the right), which are basically for each scale, proportionality constants, scalars of the form K (1D) = ð² x ³, when perceived intrinsically in its internal form, but obviously vary in dimensionality for external analysis as point-particles on a larger world (equations of energy of the graph). It is though clear that K in each of those scales is the constant of action, which has a scalar number measure, for h-planck, for k-boltman actions of entropy and for m, mass of particle vortices. It is remarkable since Science was born precisely when humans learned about those other scales with telescopes and microscopes that such a fundamental law of the Universe, has remained obscure for so long, due to some earlier conceptual errors in the understanding of time, brought about by the use of a single mechanical beat; and the natural anthropomorphism of self-centred humans, which do not like to ‘see’ themselves as part of the whole, in an absolutely relative Universe, with the same organic properties we display, inherited from that scalar structure: Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ). In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles. On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time: Sp x Tƒ = K equation is the ‘canonical equation of a dimension of space-time’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information). CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE WITH MODERN PHYSICS. The procedure of ALL posts and studies of different stiences in this blog thus s simple. We add the Disomorphisms of the ECD method (experimental facts and correspondence with classic theories, enlightened further with new insights provided by the Disomorphic space-time properties of all systems of reality). So let us apply in a very fast review, those isomorphic properties to quantum physics and relativity the last upgradings of the science of fractal=quantum space and cyclical, multiple time-clcoks (relativity). The first and fundamental insight of the Disomorphic method is this: Particles are one-dimensional vortices of accelerated information; waves are bidimensional flows of energy and information, potentials are 3-Dimensional volumes. And most properties of each of those 3 essential elements of physics can be derived of their dimensional nature; and its two fundamental states: the bidimensional symmetric s=t wave, which can ‘superpose’, accumulate into ‘bosonic groups’ (2D) and particles that collapse potentials and can convert into waves, as 3D potential – 1 D particle (which absorbs and so appears as a negative factor over the potential well) = 2D waves. So both have the same dimensionality: – Potentials of 3 D space – particles of cyclical time vortices: ð = ∑∏ waves of ‘energy’ (∑) and information (∏). So for example in relativity we have 3 ‘volume potentials’, (space metric) with a negative signature for the particle-time dimension. In waves we have the energy flat ∑-magnetic field, and the network-particle, ∏. We are not in this introduction go too deep of the mathematics of Non-Æ geometry that will renew this XXI century the formalism of all stiences including physics, likely NOT among humans (limited in IQ and wasted by hypnotic screens) but among AI future brains, which will have enough memorial capacity to ‘store’ the whole of this web, as it is a ginormous field to straighten all the elements of modern physics and establish the proper algebra to understand it all. We just shall then consider a few aspects of the whole field, so soon in the blog because the correspondence principle is due – as humans have an astounding respect for physicists 1D simplex ideas on time and space, they revere – mostly because physicists do machines. So let us first consider what is the true meaning of LOCOMOTION, the 2D waves that reproduce information and are the core matter of the studies of modern physics both in quantum (schrodinger’s equation, particle-wave complementarity) and in relativity (c-constant light space-time). In modern physics, the more interesting pending questions are the conundrums of quantum physics, as they are not just experimental problems as in Relativity, but deep theoretical questions, which plug in directly into the meaning of motion=time and still informative space, perception and measure; and the ego paradoxes of man, who sees a still world with its mind at the center and so naturally is inclined to feel more important, unique and the Universe a dead-still reality. So we shall resolve them here in a few lines. Look at the next pictures. What we observe is that when a quantum ‘state’ is measured by stopping it and absorbing it with our instruments it COLLAPSES into a particle, but when it moves IT DOES SO reproducing information as a wave. So it is quite obvious: the state of motion is a wave state, the state of informative perception is a particle, which in fact has only an intrinsic property, its ‘h/2 spin or angular momentum’, which is ‘STILL’, discrete and non-differentiable, as informative spatial minds are: The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’ The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion-wave state and a still-particle state, together. In graph group velocity is particle (ab.•) speed as it surrounds the wave (≈), whose phase velocity is V≈≥V• The wave is surrounded by the particle which is encircling it. The creational process of reproductive dimensions thus starts at its minimal scale departing from a dot that becomes a 1D line, which a wave spreads=smears but a particle orders by closing in, surrounding and fixing the waves, which start a forth and back process that decelerates it and finally stops it into standing particle points, able to gauge information as still minds. And then again the bouncing within the particle enclosure of the wave, increases its information through ∑superpositions of fourier transforms, stopping, now rotating, now stopping to create a 3D ball; and so growth is reproduction as motion is. Waves that move and become the group vital energy for the particle to stop and perceive. And so the whole moves as a group particle, and each of the inner standing waves back and fourth as a phase particle, which is in its limit taking 3 steps back and forth for each 2 steps of the particle, 2/3 being the classic harmony between the speed of the wave back and fourth and the reproductive motion of the particle forwards stopping forwards. Then mathematically this shows in the imaginary back negative moment of the wave and the positive, reproductive doubling of the particle. The fact is the best explanation of motion is one of reproduction of information, which requires a constant stop, reproduce your information in the next region of space-time, go… sliding and converting motion in yet another form of reproduction, which becomes then the fundamental ‘nature’ of reality – a fractal that reproduces information. And we shall return to that key insight. In the graph, we show also 3 practical/theoretical proofs/explanations deduced of it – just a token of the ginormous number of ‘solid’ whys provided by ∆st: . • The complementarity wave-particle and our perception of quantum motions as a constant reproduction of the wave-form states. • A fact that solves Achiles paradox, as motion has a finitesimal limit in the minimal quanta of size, of reproduction, the h-quanta of angular momentum, of both particles and waves. And so we can only measure 1/2 of the process smeared by the constant stop and go-reproduce, binary state of the particle as minimal ‘bit of informative reproduction’ and size. • But perhaps the most interesting consequence is the realist understanding of the uncertainty principle: we cannot measure position and momentum, because momentum is ‘motion’ and it is wave momentum, and position is still particle. So as the system is EITHER particle or wave in motion, the exact measure of the form as particle, ‘blurs’ the momentum-eve measuring, which means in other terms that the minimal unit of reproduction of the wave (kh) is the angular momentum, h/2π, which is always an unlocalised unit of reproductive motion. We could also say that the process of reproduction is always between two adjacent h-steps (h/2π)… In the graph, we see the quantum duality, which surprisingly enough Physicists still don’t understand as it has been the center of all its disquisitions for a century. As Born put it in its Nobel discourse: “This idea of complementarity is now regarded by most physicists as the key to the clear understanding of quantum processes. Can we call something with which the concepts of position (space) and motion (time) cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe?” We shall deal specifically with the ‘false weirdness’ of quantum physics, more of a problem of the ego-trips of man, which cannot accept vital, organic, sentient beings in any other species, and prefer the ‘abstract’ view that only man has living properties in the articles on the 4th line; as all resolves when we accept the metric of 5D, which makes smaller systems, faster in time, more informative, and hence, ultimately the particles that do reproduce when absorbing energy replicating more quarks and electrons, do gauge information and react to it, the ‘site’ of perception, whose ‘quantum’ of existence is indeed, an still, discrete ‘angle of perception’, an angular momentum called ‘h’. And so all the weirdness comes to this: the particles ‘react’ to the slow bombing of experiments (which as Bell put it, IS the name we should give to ‘abstract measure’, as we ‘experiment’ with them, and they react ‘collapsing’ into tight formations to the brutal bombs we send to measure them, as schools of fish react to the shark. And so ALL the weirdness of quantum worlds, which physicists acknowledge COMES TO those 2 things is easily resolved in the organic Universe: 1. we measure unlike in inert matter on our scale NOT the state of the particle ‘before the measure’ but its STATE after we try to measure and they react. 2. Spins are ‘still’ angles of still informative perception, the minimal units, our electronic minds use to construct reality, as its particles – the ultimate pixels of our mind – align with the ‘experiment’ they perceive as much as we perceive them. The after reaction of particles, the stop-particle-perception vs. go-wave-motion and the static spins is all the weirdness that there is to quantum physics; and they are just in ∆st, 3 kaleidoscopic perspectives from the point of view of the @-mind of the particle, its spin; and its S≈Teps of motion, through its states in still space as informative particles and time as moving waves. And with those insights we can also resolve the conundrums of relativity (constancy of c-speed, and its limit; why they define time as the 4th dimension of space, being the best known). The reductionism of lineal time only motions and its limited formulae. Time as 4D. YOU MUST REALLY even if you are a physicist or a groupie of its equations, understand clearly that v=s/t, their equation of TIME from where all other time concepts of physics spread IS ONLY lineal time motion, ONLY a type of change and TO REDUCE the 5 Dimensions of time=change=motion of reality to that single line of a cartesian graph IS plainly speaking the main reason we have NOT understood the first principles of reality; and so unless YOU accept to break that ‘Jail of the Mind’ REGARDLESS of the absolute detail physics has achieved studying locomotions in space you will never expand your understanding of reality as IT IS. Indeed, take the case of relativity. Mr. Einstein, our absolute idol and genius, the ‘seer of time’, actually just completed the work on Galileo’s formula of lineal time v=s/t, by adding on the verge of maximal speed within the galaxy (c-speed), a ‘factor’ to correct the ‘warping’ that ‘drags’=slow downs particles trying to go as fast as waves. So his formula for measure of lineal time motions and distances in space, instead of v=s/t is S²=Δr²-c² t² and then of course the entire business of measuring distances in space with lineal time-motions with extreme detail get extremely complex for the sake of accuracy. But for a philosopher of all sciences, searching for the ultimate meanings of time and space, which can be applied to all of them, as we humans do live in time, have time worldcycles, occupy a vital space and DESERVE to be explained, THIS was more of the same ‘reductionism’ of time as A MEASURE OF motions in Space (hence the quip that time is the fourth dimension of space – Not SO, only if you reduce all the time motions, changes of in-form-ation and dimensions of reality to the lineal graph of Maese Galileo, measuring with Kepler’s clock the reach of cannonballs as a the master of ballistics of the venetian army. Of course we WILL explain further all of physics, in growing detail as time goes by. But this must be clear again: you can either have dogmas, idols and believe, and then you have nothing to do in this blog, or you can ‘think’, be humble, understand as Aristotle, the highest mind of mankind put it ‘that the only thing we know is that we know nothing’ and then keep reading. Further on we try to RESPECT as much as possible the correspondence principle. SO since physicists use only lineal time motion as a dimension of time, which they call the 4th dimension and then of course, when dealing with the future of time, use worldlines NOT worldcycles to describe life and death and ENTROPY=death (the next step of simplification of lineal time, now also expanding and breaking the being) as the supposed future of all realities, which they call the ‘arrow of time’, (but are at pains to understand what it means and how to related it to the 2Dimension of lineal motion), we shall call ENTROPY, scattering disordered death the 4TH DIMENSION of time. That’s really the best I can do trying to respect our ‘seers of time’, which would do better going back to school. Let us then for good ‘measure’ expand a bit or rather explain the ‘limits’ of an analysis of reality with only an abstract cartesian pen and paper continuous graph of light space-time as relativity does; and then give more interesting answers to quantum weirdness, from an organic pov. Relativity of c-speed. The first thing we have to understand is what it is really the ‘abstract graph of pen and paper’ Newton considered the background God draw Not Descartes, behind the equations of reality, he added on it. In the galaxy we live in, where we make ALL our measures, the vacuum space IS light space-time, a background radiation of LIGHT. So LIGHT is the ‘abstract’ graph but IT IS A LOCAL light space-time, because inside black holes there is darkness – light is not; and outside galaxies there is darkness, hardly any light crosses the halo of galaxies. So it is OBVIOUS that as you cannot in a very fast river stream run faster, the more so if you are a heavy particle; you cannot go faster than c-light in the galactic river. Moreover, as your mind IS ELECTRONIC, and we have clarify that WE STOP AS PARTICLES TO PERCEIVE information, when two electronic atoms MEASURE light, they have FIRST entangled in ‘stillness’, then sent each other a light beam but AS THEY ARE in a fractal Universe STOPPED in relationship to each other – THEY MEASURE ALWAYS C-LIGHT SPEED, they do NOT add THEIR slow macroscopic speed, as PERCEPTION HAPPENS in the quantum scale, in STILLNESS. Alas, THE CONUNDRUM OF c-speed constancy, and the limit of c-speed within galaxies IS solved. The rest of relativity consists IN calculating from the perspective of the macro-system that SEEMS to be moving, the still c-speed of the microsystem of particles, communicating with each other in stillness. All this said, as I know the reader, if any will be a man who ‘idolises’ the high popes of physics, our ‘present seers’ of time, and will like to know what all this has to do with his ‘dogma-theory’ (4D relativity and quantum physics); all what we say just widens and explains better the weirdness and limits of 4D relativity (which is just the study of 2 specific planes of the 5D scalar Universe, the light space-time plane in special relativity and the gravitational larger russian doll in general relativity). And so we do ‘revis(it)e’ Relativity in the more specialised 4th line articles to show how it fits as a ‘smaller theory’ of a part of the whole scalar Universe, which goes beyond its limits of space-time (c-speed as the rod of measure of ‘constant space’, T=0 temperature of time-motion) beyond the galaxy (hyperluminal speeds=actions at distance in regions where there is NOT a background light space-time) and the black hole (an accelerated time vortex that should go beyond c-speed and 0 temperature past the event horizon). Those obvious, increasingly proved experimental facts that widen the limits of relativity beyond the galaxy, are poised to be accepted as faster than z=c speed jets of matter coming out of black holes in galaxies become overwhelming (they already are, as the third picture above at 10c shows, but lacking the 5D formalism astrophysicists prefer to deny facts for lack of models and elaborate bizarre arguments to deny those faster than c-speeds). All this said we must also stress that 5D² IS a theory that applies to all ‘stiences’ and scales, as each science merely studies a scale of size, and ALL of them are equally important. The time cycles of life or history are NOT less important than those of quantum particles. So the reader MUST understand that the primacy of physicists IS cultural, as the makers of weapons, the tools of power, and machines, the idols of our technological civilisation. But on pure theoretical, modelling basis, we shall NOT keep their idolised position as the ‘seers of time’, more important in its time=motion analysis that let us say, Darwin who study motion=change in the information of life, or Kondratieff, which study the cycles of evolution of machines in economics, or Spengler who studied the life and death of organic civilisations. If anything less important as we do NOT move=chance at light speed, and the 2Dimension of motion is for us far less important than the 0-1Dimension of ‘genesis’ and perceptive information. The error of discontinuity. Points with parts. Thus the web takes sides in the dispute between Einstein and Planck: the last experimental and theoretical studies seem to prove that space and time are quantic, discontinuous as Planck said. From that fact we deduce that each piece of space has a quantity of quantic energy and each cycle of time carries an amount of information. Yet since all what exists is made of energy and information from the previous homology we deduce that all beings, including human beings, are made of quantic cycles of temporal information or ‘bits’ and quantic pieces of spatial energy or ‘bites’, and the Space-Time Universe is a sum of quantic beings made up with those 2 substances. Scientists don’t analyze temporal energy in all its quantic details because they study space and time through Mathematics, which has, as all languages, a limited capacity to carry information. So it simplifies reality, making each entity of the Universe with an inner content of information and energy a number, represented as a point, defined by Euclid as ‘a form without breath’, without ‘information’. Then, once the inner content of those points are gone, mathematics puts all those points together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space/Time graph, which seems to us ‘a continuous reality’, though it is only a simplified, linguistic representation of the Universe. Since, when we look at the real beings of the Universe in detail, those points have parts, a content of ‘energy’ that lasts a quantity of time cycles. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they become spheres, points with breath, with parts: an atom, a cell, and a star… Something without breath, without dimensions – as Euclid defined a point – is something that does not exist. Abstract points are fantasies. They are not real. Anything you draw will have a size, a minimum of 2 dimensions in paper, and 3 dimensions in reality. Look at yourself: your Head is a point with 3 dimensions, not a number in a mathematical statistics. The Space-Time Continuum becomes then the space-time discontinuum, made of infinite quanta of temporal energy, which ‘act’ together to create the forms of the Universe. We live in a Universe made of quantic actions, of moving temporal energy. Reality is done by infinite discontinuous actions exerted by all type of beings, product of their spatial energy multiplied by their temporal information. Space/time is not a static, fixed “mathematical image” created by our mind – but it moves constantly, acts through its quantic pieces. We are an organic system that “acts”, processing spatial energy with our quantic bodies and temporal information with our brains. Planck expressed with that name, taken from the organic philosophy of Leibniz and Hegel, the fact that the Universe is not material but organic, made of cyclical forms in perpetual change and movement. All continuous, static forms become discontinuous and mobile when observed in detail. Mathematics simplify reality. How they do it? Making each organism of the Universe a point, and putting them all together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space. We cannot though know all the information of reality with a single language, a simplified mirror that our mind puts on the Universe. Thus the space-time continuum is a simplification of a quantic reality caused by the fact that in mathematics a plane of space is not made of points with volume, but of abstract points without volume. In reality however all what exists when observed in detail, is made of discontinuous points with volume. If you look at a table in detail you will see discontinuous points called molecules, made of discontinuous points called atoms, made of discontinuous points called protons and electrons, made of discontinuous points called photons, made of discontinuous points called Plank Quanta. And that minimal scale of smaller, discontinuous points with volume, with dimension, is what we call the Organic point, the first Unit of In-form-ation, of form in the Universe. The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws. It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality: The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’). – And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being. Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy. We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms: The discontinuous, discrete Universe of space-time can also be expressed in terms of form and motion, stop and go, space and time symmetries And the duality particle – wave. You move as a wave, but then you expel energy. You gauge information as a particle, when you stop. You do not move as a particle, because it is much slower. Let us consider this important symmetry, from its 30 years old first graph, in which I was defining ‘speed of reproduction, TxS, the function of present (-; as a teenager )-: Thus it follows that momentum is a complete description of the system, as Mass is the Tƒ element and speed the wave element, on a given field. While the field is ‘hidden’ on the wave space-length, which is a quanta by quanta step growth of the system. From this relationship we can find some basic concepts of cyclical time, such as density of information and the related ‘mass-charge’ value. What matters here now is to understand two things: A particle is just the next scale of a wave, in which all those memorial motions of the wave when the ‘particle’ stops, clump together into the point in which the particle stopped collapsing the wave into a particle, whose ‘mass’ is related to the frequency of the wave (number of M-cycles which collapse in the point). Thus by definition a Mass is related to: – The speed of the wave and the internal clock of the wave (in this the best work is still the first article of De Broglie in which ill-understood he explains how mass and group-wave are in fact two versions of the same concept with the same clock, origin of quantum complementarity principle). It follows some very interesting deductions: – Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave. – An external observed which has the perception of ‘particles’, will find the motion of the wave in the ‘lower plane’ as ‘invisible’, thin, ghostly. Here is where we find the ‘pi irrationals’, as the wave NEVER CLOSES ITS PI-CYCLES, which do not exist by definition. In the point of the particle, the particle acquires a new dimension as the coming M-quanta of the Planck frequency or Mass frequency (the quanta of mass, not being discussed in this level). Now, this was one of my first discoveries on 5D physics, back in the early 90s, truly one of the first milestones of my work. As it turns out a few years ago it appeared a model of physics based in that concept. (This has constantly happened for 30 years so I lost the count of models and solutions in all sciences that mimicked my work on T.Œ and are now standard or not of science, among them the most notorious memetics, dark matter calculus – that 95%, black hole growing importance in astrophysics – at the time of my first models of galacells they did not even imagine there were black holes in the center of all well formed galaxies, they still do NOT know they are top quark stars, hopefully they won’t learn it making them at home, epigenetics in biology and palingenetics / development laws and the confirmation of the 2008 crisis in economics predicted as earlier as 93). Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental function of beings, the ‘momentum’ of a past x Future particle and the wave requires a more profound analysis. Since in fact physical systems do have both states together as we do, waves and momentums, bodies and heads. And this is the huge discovery of quantum physics not properly understood. Each system is in fact 10 dimensional, when we take the concept of dimension in mathematical terms as a structural parameter of the being – its 3 scales in 5D, 3 spatial parts and 3 time ages, plus the Œ point focus of its æ,e, ï,œ,û actions, which will further add new dimensions as we observe then the ‘œ-point’ in its interaction with ‘external world-beings’ through several planes of existence. Yes, the beauty of the Universe resides in its complex simplicity and the web of relationships of each part with its wholes. Yet NEVER humans do explain the WHOLE but just a part and often in physical sciences where the œ studied is far removed (Max. ï distance from the human observer), reduce the study to a single perspective, often the most degrading, from the lower ∆-1 point of view and from the æ-ction of motions). This is a tiresome human ego-trip of one-dimensional scholars who spend their life to prove that their perspective IS the only one that matters, (one of the reasons I abandoned the field earlier in my life, ‘evil=antilive memes’ and ‘stupid=one-dimensional memes’ define most humans I found in ‘existence’). Yet the proper analysis might be shrunk according to the importance of those 4 elements eliminating by this order: the 5 actions of the Œ-point (maximal external point of view, which removes also the ‘will’ of the being); the 5D ±1 Planes above and below (social world and cellular/quanta point of view), the temporal ages from conception to extinction, focusing on the Adult maximal reproductive, present age (limiting the widest temporal zero-sum point of view to a quanta of present time), and finally the Spe-field/limbs & Tƒ-head/particle point f view, focusing on its body-wave central part). Thus if we want to reduce the essence of a phenomenon to a single cause though we must choose that which is the ‘central’ Œ-ssence of the system: its present, body-wave, individual plane of the being SINCE IT IS THE MOST EVIDENT PERSPECTIVE. In the case of physical entities, this is a PRESENT wave in reproductive motion, (‘female’ balanced perspective). So quantum physicist in the perspectives of physical entities focused on the wave-particle duality, observing from the human removed p.o.v. the reproductive motion of the Spe-field>ExI-wave<Tƒ-Particle, its fundamental perspective, (left side). The phenomenon is fascinating because it illustrates many of the properties of 5D ST reality and deals directly with the oldest logic paradoxes – today largely forgotten on the ‘computerized age of science’ when the mere feeding of mathematical models to mental-machines by ‘human bee-workers’ summarizes science: what is the MEANING OF MOTION? This paradox never resolved since Parmenides affirmed the point of view of the particle – motion is NOT possible, only form exists, and Zeno proved it with its paradoxes (Achilles and the turtle, the motion of the arrow; while Heraclitus considered the point of view of the Wave – motion is constant as the particle-ego-informative fixed point does NOT exist). On the other hand the informative point of view of the particle, dominating the wave and using it to guide its motion, was foreseen by Einstein and developed by De Broglie, with its idea of a pilot wave. They were the 2 pioneers of the field (De Broglie developed the first mathematical particle-wave equations); and yet both were ignored. Instead the perspectives today considered are, NOT SURPRISINGLY!, the ego paradox and mathematical abstract model (Germanic idealist Copenhagen interpretation), and the energetic lineal degrading point of view (waves and particles as ‘excitations’ of the energy of the ∆-1 field – Feynman’s perspective.) Now we shall do a bit more of a detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics as they would illuminate its relationship with the physics of 5D, restricted to the earlier discoveries of Einstein, De Broglie and Schrodinger, as we have already mentioned them. de Broglie found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field. He had found the simplest organism of nature, which we will see is isomorphic to all the similar organisms of different size of the Universe: Spe (lineal field) < ExI – wave < Spherical Particle of information. And so he wrote the simple equation: λ (wave) x P (particle with momentum) = H (Planckton) Now the meaning of this equation properly written would be V (Spe-field) > l (ExI-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H That is, the description of a space-time system, a Planckton, from the perspective of its interaction with the entropic gravitational field provided by the quark-mass in the center of the atom. This Planckton though will have MANY roles according to its space-time program of cyclical actions (±∆æ: motion field, e-nergy food for other particles, ∆ï: bit of information, ∆œ: reproductive wave and ∫œ=û: colors). So it is NOT a mechanical species – and this realization– that quantum particles are truly complex beings with multiple properties and behaviors not so easily described as the simpler analysis of our motions in space by mechanics is WHAT TRULY CONNECTS quantum physics and T.Œ. Of course we humans are also complex beings besides our mechanics of ∂a (actions of motions) but we do not try to explain actions such as reproduction (particle decoupling), gauging of information (spin z-orientation) and social evolution (magnetic distribution), with ‘mathematical equations’ as those are like the 3 body-problem, actions which ‘have a restricted quantity of information available’ as in the 5D fractal space-time Universe, there are infinite Œ with external membranes that protect information from outer analysis. That is the essence and beauty of the free, individual scale of the Universe. NOBODY knows ALL the information of any entity except the entity itself, which is the only one with 1-probabiluty of absolute information. Humans though have megalomaniac pretensions of being God-like, trying control-freak behavior with reality INSTEAD of understanding the living whys of those particles. All this said, we can then consider a fast survey of the mathematical elements of the H-planckton-wave duality fusion the ‘organic perspective’. De Broglie’s Wave Theory Quanta of light had never, of course, been treated in this manner; but de Broglie saw no reason why particles of matter, since they, too, are “isolated fragments of energy,” should not also have an associated internal periodic process. When the particle is at rest the frequency of the internal process is v0 and the energy of the particle is hv0, following the Einstein equation. Another Einstein energy equation can also be applied to the particle at rest, (m0 is the particle’s rest mass), this one being derived from the theory of special relativity. When the two energies are equated the rest frequency of the internal periodic process is found to be The frequency v0 follows the internal process according to the particle’s “own clock.” A fixed observer, who sees the particle moving with velocity v = ßc (ß = v/c), finds a different frequency V1, which must be less than v0 by the factor 1— ß2, due to the relativistic “dilation” of time intervals. This, however, is not the frequency which the quantum theory associates with a moving particle. Write the quantum theory frequency as v, so that, according to the two Einstein equations above, the particle’s energy is either hv or to the fixed observer who sees the particle moving with velocity v = ßc. The problem of reconciling the frequencies v and v1 was central to de Broglie’s investigation. It determined the “whole trend” of his work. He solved the problem in a formal way by assigning the frequency v not directly to the internal periodic behavior of the particle, but to a wave that accompanies the particle through space and time in such a way that it is always in phase with the internal process. This is, then, a traveling wave whose phase at time t and at the point x where the particle is located is (assuming linear motion) in which u is the “phase velocity” of the wave (the velocity of a particular wave crest). The phase velocity u is now evaluated by making the two phases the same. Two properties of de Broglie’s particle waves have been determined, the frequency v and phase velocity u. A third property, the wave-length X, can be related to these two with an equation common to all wave motion. The real strength of de Broglie’s argument lies in the various simple and highly suggestive uses he found for his particle waves. One of these develops a remarkable “wave equation” for the particle momentum. Begin with the relativistic equation for the momentum, p = m0v/ 1 — ß2, and transform it to wave language as follows: The symbol v, as before, represents the wave number. A momentum equation, p = hv, known to the world as the “de Broglie equation,” has been brought forth with a mathematical and physical appearance very close to the Einstein energy equation E == hv. The two equations E = hv and p = hv put in a particularly acute form the difficulties of the wave-particle duality. Each equation has a “particle quantity” on the left, a “wave quantity” on the right and the ever-present Planck’s constant standing between. The phase velocity of the de Broglie particle waves has the seemingly impossible property that it is greater than the velocity of light (the particle velocity v is always less than c, so that u = c2/v > c). How can the motion of these mysterious waves possibly relate to the actual motion of a particle? De Broglie demonstrated that the physically significant wave velocity is not the phase velocity but the “group velocity,” the velocity of the reinforcement regions formed when many waves are superimposed. IN brief, THE WAVE HAS THE SAME VELOCITY IN ITS BODY THAN THE HEAD, AND A FIELD-WAVE GOES AHEAD SEEING THE MOTION THAT THE BODY-HEAD WILL HAVE. Practical analysis: the Galilean paradox in electronic and light motions. For that reason, we can always consider a stop and go motion in physics; which has enormous repercussions in theoretical physics and the understanding of relativity and the Lorentz transformations, treated elsewhere in those texts: In the graph, the stop and go motion of electrons and the virtual creation and extinction of particles in the light space-time sheet, have a quite different enlightening description in relational space-time physics. Some of the phenomena involved: Electrons and anti-electrons are time past to future (life longer) and future to past (death shorter) time arrows. As such both inverse functions past-entropy (antiparticle) x future-information (particle) = Present light space-time, annihilate giving birth to the relative ‘present-space’ of our galactic world, light space-time. Light space-time condensates into virtual particles, Spe>Tƒ, evolving the field of motion into a particle of charge, which then dissolves back in Tƒ<Spe, an antiparticle event. Both collide giving birth to present, and any of those similar space-time equations provide an insight in the particle-antiparticle duality. Further on it explains why there are less antiparticles in total space-time, as they are as many in space, as many ‘deaths as lives’ we might say, but death is an instant, so we do NOT see as many antiparticles that last so little as we do not see many corpses in the our daily life – even if there are as many as living on the long count. Further on, because information is perceived and emitted in stillness, the previous process of stop and go, electronic stop, emission of ¥ rays, motion, stop perception of ¥ rays, means that in relativity we can also construct a new metric in which time and length remain constant and what changes is the speed of light, since we are perceiving (Michelson’s experiment) a process of electronic stoppage every time it emits and perceives light, hence LIGHT becomes c-constant because to emit it and perceive it the electron stops, IN RELATIONSHIP to its lower ‘gravitational space-time’ in which the electron co-exists. Then how do we measure and operate in frames of reference that are still and moving is the knots and bolts of Galilean and einsteinium relativity? Relativity though is an incomplete theory in its explanation of what studies. It studies only a membrane of space-time of the 5th dimension, that of c-speed/time in as much as it is light space-time, the medium where we ‘float’. Over what that light imprints itself (gravitational space) is of not concern here. Suffice to say that in the game of Russian dolls, the gravitational doll is larger and encases with points of faster rotational time frequency (black holes) and lines of faster lineal momentum (strings), the light space-time. The transition between both worlds thus imply as always in any up and down transition along the 5th dimension a change in the speed of time and size in space of each quanta and bit of spatial energy and temporal information. In what concerns though our world we live in a region of speeds and densities of space and time, which we might call the thermodynamic range, which is well in the stable zone of light space-time (well above, O k and below c – speed). This entire revis(it)ed Relativity analysis could itself fill a bulky book, and give us deep insights on the way our mind or an electronic instrumental mind bias the perception of motions and stillness. It is not though a main theme in an introduction. Recap: Time is change. Physics is dedicated to measure particles and forces in space and time with the restricted concept of ‘time-clock’ – the study of change in the cyclical motions of beings with an instrument called ‘the clock’ and a single language, mathematics. Logic is dedicated to the wider analysis of all types of time-changes, with all types of instruments and languages. It follows that the Logic definition of Time as change is wider and more important for a General Theory of Time than the Physical definition of time clock. The Galilean Paradox is equivalent to the isomorphism and isotropism of the Universe at small scales, in the region of the infinitesimals, ∆ˆ-1 quanta of the upper scale. Regardless of their true content of energy and information in close view, the quanta of a Universal scale appears as infinitesimal indivisible, in the quantum’s scale. In that regard the perspectives that do matter are the ones of the 10 components of the generator: The truth of present quantum physics. Now once we have dealt with the basic notions of light space and its similar forces, it is time to get more classic and referential with canonical physics – the quantum model, correcting though some of its errors of ‘subjectivity’, ‘mathematical reductionism’ and ‘experimental limits with the OLE method, of non-human Objectivity, multiple linguistic points of view and Experimental Evidence, to the service of truth (and the added classic methodology of Minimalism, Correspondence and cyclical predictability): Œ=Mc2. Seriously, if there is any scientific discipline where those errors are paramount is in quantum physics because against the rightful opinion of the 3 foremost physicists of the XX century, and pioneers of the discipline, Planck, Einstein and Schrodinger, for whom I have a deep respect, the ‘idealist’, ‘polemist’, gregarious and influential tern of Bohr, Heisenberg and Born imposed their ‘Germanic, Hegelian, imaginary, abstract entelechies of mathematical only interpretations’ very much on the Mood of Mr. Hilbert and the rest of the ‘gothic’ thinkers of that age, for whom ‘mathematics was imaginary’ as Hilbert famously started his ‘axiomatic method’, let us imagine a point, a line and a plane. THIS WON’T DO in a T.Œ, which pretends to describe objectively, experimentally and linguistically with all the mind mirrors available to man the Universe. So we will NOT accept quantum subjectivity. Electrons ARE NOT IDENTICAL because we just can perceive them ONLY IN THOSE TERMS and hence extract from them only statistical and probabilistic information, as WE DO WITH molecules in thermodynamics, pigs in farms and with PEOPLE in economics. Those are OUR limits, but we are to suppose that while the same probabilistic laws work for insurance companies with humans, atoms in crystals and particles in quantum theory ALL systems are made of particles which differ in position and momentum (externally measured) and have ‘internal parts’ which will differ, on close view. And so on and so on. So we consider absurd and arrogant that an economist would tell all humans are equal because he handle us with money, the constant of action of economics. This was the jump of the Copenhagen interpretation we reject. We DO use probabilities in insurance, thermodynamics and quantum but that does NOT mean humans, and molecules and particles are INDISTINGUISHABLE if we had enough information on them. To believe so is to substitute the limits of our perception with the subjective vision that what man measures is the ONLY reality that exists. It is far more important and intriguing to realize that THROUGH 5TH DIMENSIONAL PLANES, information and energy does not transfer and so the human mind IS limited to know not all but only part of the information of a being. Thus if we call 1 the total information of a being, there will be a probability of truth which in T.Œ we calculate according to the OLE method, as the product of Objectivity, Linguistic Complexity and Experimental evidence. It is not important to quantify but to qualify ANY theory by its objectivity (human detachment of it), and reject subjective theories. So this is the point where we can give 1 or 0 value, to objective or subjective theories. Copenhagen interpretation is subjective of 0 value. Schrodinger’s is 1 value. And Einstein’s though not realized, is a potential 1 value (to explain as the rest of science, that is with correspondence to other theories quantum physics). THUS THIS WILL BE THE ACCEPTED VIEW, NOT the rejection of the experimental facts (duality particle-wave, which as we have seen has an immediate explanation in the ACTUAL fact all systems do have an ST>Tƒ, wave-particle structure or body-head in biology), but THE SEARCH FOR logic, isomorphic explanations to those quantum facts. As we just have done with the duality, or in previous paragraphs with the collapse of the wave when observed, as all moving systems collapse into tight particle-configurations when ‘attacked’ by a perpendicular force that invades its vital space from armies to schools to fractal electronic waves. WE DO NOT ACCEPT LAZY, CUCKOO idealist German outdated arrogant Hilbert-like pseudo-Nazi religions of science all the rage in the XX century which in history did give birth with the same conceptual Hegelian views to Nazism, Communism and the like. Point. Then the other 2 legs of truth to sustain a theory, Linguistic Complexity and experimental evidence, which can be quantified (and the equivalent, MC2, minimalism, correspondence and cyclic predictability, associated to the OLE elements as we refer in the foreword to this article.) Linguistic complexity according to the isomorphisms of Nature implies that if we can describe a system with an organic, 5D structure, hence from an organic point of view, if we can describe it through its life-death cycle in time, hence from a causal, logic point of view, and we can describe it through its symmetries of space, hence from a mathematical, topological point of view (either using a continuous differential model of geometry or a discrete arithmetic model of quanta – both are equivalent as we explain in U±∞ on mathematics and on our analysis of space-time symmetries), and finally we can describe it mentally, from the perspective of a linguistic 0-point of mind and its 5 actions of survival, considering the possibility that that system can receive and emit information either through time-logic languages or mathematical spatial forces (and this can be objectively evaluated by experience), we DO have a maximal 1 truth in our model. So we shall give 1/4 values for Organic, Mathematical, Causal and Mental/action/survival analysis. On that view, the present quantum ‘so much praised’ mathematical description, considered even in Britannica, the ‘highest intellectual achievement’ of the XX century, is still 1/4th of the truth of quantum physics, that of an external, human observer, which limits itself (without Copenhagen interpretations) to 1/4th of the truth of quantum physics. Now let us not be stingy and consider that while not acknowledging it, quantum physics does give us a lot of information on the cyclicality, organic structure and causal symmetries of its physical systems and rise those bits and bites here and there to around ½ of truth. We will then try to fill up the rest with organic, mental and cyclical time models to grasp the whole of it. Since finally the Experimental evidence, is indeed close to 1. We cannot extract more knowledge of quantum physics from the human perspective (1 is the truth humans can extract from a system, obviously, only the system has ALL the information about itself, so we are here on the Heisenberg concept that we do have to explain the observed facts, but NOT on his theory that THE OBESERVED FACTS IS ALLW HAT THERE IS TO IT, this is the idealist, arrogant human part on it). Now there is not further important experimental evidence requires since the kind of nuclear physics experiments taking place in quantum (accelerators, creation of big-bangs and black holes on earth) put mankind at risk of extinction and an extinct researcher knows nothing, so it is a potential risk to put to waste the obtained 1 x 1 (Schrodinger -Einstein interpretation completed in this blog) x ½ (modeling which is mathematically maximal, but lacks recognition of the organic phenomena it describes, such as the wave particle duality and collapse, or the social hierarchies between quanta and wholes, etc., which we will also complete in this blog) All in all we give quantum theory ½ of truth, we do have hopes that with the help of T.Œ, if not this researchers old and sick and unable to complete the herculean job, but easily a few dedicated physicists on his paths, will be able to complete an put quantum to the level of the known-known physical systems, between the molecular –chemical scale and the geological surface system, of the earth which are qualified today as 1×1 x 1 (limited information starting on the interior of the sun and the planet). And so we MUST apply the isomorphic method to quantum physics. We MUST explain all together its discoveries with all those isomorphic perspectives, and top the discipline with the organic, causal, topological explanation of its ‘constants’, of which we already offered a teaser on the previous paragraph. But things have gotten worse since the times there was at least an argument between Schrodinger and Einstein on one side and Bohr, Born and Heisenberg on the idealist, ego-centric human point of view. The latter won and now there is NO argument, not even interest on understanding the ‘other properties’ of quantum systems, as after II world war, the evolution of chips made quantum physics just an industrial praxis, no longer a theoretical search for the ultimate truths of nature (and no, to classify the zoo of particles is not to find the ultimate answers, as to classify species of ants is NOT to resolve the theory of evolution, the answer, which will always be a synthetic T.Œ departing from experimental evidence). And now our big statement: Physics, as most human scientific endeavors, during the age of ‘electronics’ and metal-minds, due to the excess of irrelevant information obtained with those machines (breaking Minimalist, simple symmetries), bias towards mathematical only models (the language of those mental machines) and the pumping up of the human observers’ ego, an infinitesimal ever more stupid by atrophying his brain to metal machines (loose of objectivity) is widely breaking the scientific method. And the result of this is the perception that because the Human Observer does NOT see enough of the quantum and cosmic scales, they ARE different (here the observer limit is confused with the observable), and even more bizarre theories (anthropic principle, where the Universe is created to create man not man is created by the Universe), the big bang (the observer must know it all and since man is finite in time and space so it is the Universe to fit it with all its properties into his minimalist mind), entropy only theories (here the militaristic, lineal, visual ‘white man’ physicist, crossed with the visual Neanderthal genetically and memetically with the history of weapons, decides that the Universe is lineal and energetic, dying into the future because that is his worldly military profession as physicist), and so on and so on. All this we shall repeat as the Universe repeats its truths, is pure scientific error, because we shall show ALL scales of reality are similar follow the 10 isomorphisms and symmetries of those equations and can be described, ascribing differences to two simple reasons: – Human subjective errors. – Fractal structure of the universe in which each fractal scale is SIMILAR not equal, so there are indeed variations between a cell and a human, but both are living beings with the same space-time functions and topologies. Now we keep for latter the argument on the objectivity of relativity theory, and give you the analysis of the observable Tiƒ, masses and charges and how they indeed are proofs of the fractal nature of the Universe, as both can be unified through the metric of 5D as the two time clocks of the largest and smallest observable scales of the Universe. Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ->M=ƒ(K). We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field: Se (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information. And so he wrote: λ x P (mv ) = H (Planckton) Written in 5D as Vs (Se-field) > l (ST-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H But while this is now standard 1st course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how time changed its clock slowing down as the wave-particle increased its speed-length in the 5th dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave space-distance: ∆ L = -∆Tƒ x ∆Sp=K, So we can now return to the 4 theories of mass, the Sp-Energy Hamiltonian, Se-Poisson gradient, Tiƒ-Einstein’s forms and Tƒ-Newton’s/Kepler time-space vortex which gave us the simplest Unification Equation for all of them… to do some conceptual thinking (as usual we stress physical numbers are ok and equations will be dealt with in 4th line, concepts do matter though and must be clarified in this 2nd line first). The 3+∆ perspectives of gravitational forces. Let us thus consider a more advanced application of the isomorphic=linguistic method to make sense of the evolution of a specific branch of physical systems – the study of gravitational forces and its isomorphisms, which give birth to 3+0 different type of equations to describe the same system from the perspective of those 3+0 systems. An important fact of all sciences is the parallelism of the formulation, both in qualitative and quantitative terms of any law of science, which seem all seemingly close to the truth (the total truth of a system, by definition only exists in the system itself, which carries all its information). This now can be explained, considering that epistemological truths require as all forms and motions, a ‘perspective’ or point of view, which in a Universe with 4 essential components, which we shall resume in 4 words, ‘fractal actions of space and time’, gives us a total of 4 basic interpretations of all systems. Whereas the total truth available to human perception, would be the sum of them all. Let us consider an example, as we have used elements of its structure in this introduction: the 4 explanations of the laws of gravitation, which correspond to the spatial-formal-relativistic, temporal-moving-Newtonian, scalar-gradient-Poisson and action-lagrangian perspectives of the analysis of gravitational forces: The evolution of the concept of mass, from classic physics, in which the rubber-model of relativity considered mass a solid substance in the center of the gravitational space-time whirl, to the pictures of bubble chambers in which the vortex seems not to have anything in its center, as a hurricane does, to the fractal understanding of those vortices of mass as composed of many smaller fractal vortices. In the graph, 3+∆ different descriptions of gravitational space-time. While most physicist would only consider the first one (description of the form/curvature of space-time with Einstein’s equation), as it is the most modern/detailed; in reality they represent 4 relative ceteris paribus analysis of the ‘scalar space-time’ of gravitation, which stress the 3 relative elements of all systems, its ‘motion’, which can be seen as ‘form’ (Galilean Paradox), and ‘exists’ not only in a single plane but in a ‘5th dimension’ with an scalar gradient of size or speed. Hence Newton’s central equation describes a vortex in motion, Einstein describes the form of space-time and Poison, the gradient of increasing acceleration of the field. We shall often find in science a binary or ternary equivalent description of a system. Only one-dimensional humans tend to think the ‘last’ one is valid. For example in quantum physics we have the static, formal perception of Heisenberg’s Matrix, and the wave-motion perception of Schrodinger. Of the many new disciplines of knowledge open by scalar fractal space and cyclical time, the reorganization of all theories according to its relative truth, integrates all of them as partial visions of the ‘total truth’ about a system, which will require at least those 3 points of view. Finally the perspective of a cyclical zero sum, between birth and extinction is provided by Lagrangian/Hamiltonian Mechanics, and the principle of stationary actions, which states for physics the basic pattern of a worldcycle, in which an entity will choose on a trajectory of possible multiple histories, certain maximal and minimal ‘zero’ points that make it go through the 3 ‘phases’ of a space-time cycle and end in a zero point. And the 4 will be valid with different uses. Scholars will prefer the more complex. In this blog as a norm we shall use them all but stress the simplest one, as it is normally the ‘first historic analysis’, which highlights the most important elements. I.e. Newton’s theory of an accelerated mass turning in a vortex like motion goes to the core of what ‘gravitation is’: a force that transform lineal space into cyclical clocks of time. Einstein’s analysis of the entire space-time as an static form filled with curvatures provoked by energy and mass, simply is too abstract and mathematically complex to discover that simple truth (though Einstein did made clear the concept with its Principle of equivalence: gravitation ≈ acceleration, hence it follows easily that a mass is just the final phase of that accelerated, cyclical vortex of gravitation). We shall consider this kind of questions in depth when we get to complete the 4th line of this endeavor (maybe in 2016). Now, contrary to belief, if we were to consider one of those 4 systems only, it is Newton’s the one more important, because it goes to the essence. As a rule the first ideas, the simplest models are those who give us the deepest understanding, and those are the time-motion perspective, while the last more complex, static analysis give us the highest details – and that would be the Einstein’s perspective. It means that we must rely on the work of Einstein and Riemann on a fractal, topological analysis, not on a probabilistic description to understand mass, black holes, and big bangs of quark-gluon soups. Because of the mathematical complexity of fractal relativity, we shall consider here a simplified approach to those themes, using Newton’s description of a fluid vortex, which is 90-percent-plus accurate, and focus on the conceptual principles. But there is available literature in the work of those and other fractal pioneers to fully grasp the meaning of mass, gravitation, black holes, quark condensates and the consequences for mankind of making those hurricanes of space-time on Earth. The mathematical modeling of cyclones as fractals has been verified by practical observation. A large tornado harbors multiple suction vortices inside the column of dust, and subsidiary whirls continually form and dissipate around the bottom edges of a tornado. This is the simplest image of what a black hole is: a series of quark spins that form the densest space-time fluid of the Universe. Today, the previous picture of a vortex of space-time dragging masses into a black hole has become a commonplace in the analogical research of black holes to the point that physicists study black hole properties with “dumb holes” made with atomic superfluid vortices. It is a very pertinent comparison. The difference is that what it falls into the black hole are the tiniest forms of the gravitational membrane: fractal strings and their wholes, quarks and gluons. That is why a black hole erases our light reality: it sucks, folds, and packages in the form of a superfluid all the quarks and matter of our Universe. In fact, the proof of that theory and the falsity of black hole evaporation have come with the first experiments that tried to make a dumb black hole of atomic superfluids that absorb sound phonons instead of light phonons. They did it at Haifa just a year ago; they were atomic superfluid vortices, Bose-Einstein condensates that turned at supersonic speeds inside the vortex, absorbing sounds. They were self-similar to quark holes that absorb light, but they did not evaporate or emit the slightest trace of sounds. So they were called dumb holes. This means quark holes will not evaporate either. Transformations of Fractal Space/Energy and Fractal Information/Clocks of Time We now have enough understanding of the mathematical structure of fractal beings as networks of self-similar cells/points with a content of lineal energy and cyclical information to understand what we mean by a Universe made of fractal space and fractal time. The simplest one of those beings in our Universe is the drawing we made of an electromagnetic field. This entity defined by Planck as H, an action of energy and time, has two fields, one of magnetic energy and one of electric form. Yet it is also a piece of fractal space-time that occupies a space and has a clock/frequency rhythm. We are all made of evolved pieces of light, which is absorbed and evolved into electrons, which are the electroweak substance of which reality is made. And when we put together all those pieces of reality, the medium of light-space in which we exist and all the evolved beings of light, we get the Universe. Imagine a sea of water where the medium is water and the pieces that swim on it are indeed evolved forms of water (we have 90 percent of water in our bodies). All together form the ocean. The ocean is not an “abstract” space-time Cartesian coordinates. In essence, any fractal space-time can be defined as a medium of formless space, made of a network of simple bites of energy, inhabited by more complex informative beings. And each of those beings can also be modeled by the complementarity principle with two elements—a body of spatial, energetic cells/points and a head or particle made with a network of fractal cycles of information. Even the simplest particles, quarks, are made of networks of smaller particles called gluons while electrons are nebulae of smaller particles, ultradense photons, shown in the most recent pictures of electrons, which seem as a bundle of curved light rays. The topology and structure of those organic networks might vary, but all comes to the same shapes: force and lines of energy create the vital spaces of reality, and cycles and clocks of information create the clocks of time of the Universe. A fractal is a system of self-similar cells generated by a feedback equation that transforms energy into information. This complex definition of a fractal being can be made more precise when we understand the meaning of the generator equation of a fractal in the real world, beyond the language of mathematics. Any informative code can be a generator equation of a fractal being. A human fractal is generated by the code of information of the genome; a mathematical fractal is generated by a much simpler equation. The Universe and all its systems are in that sense fractals with different generating equations of different complexities. Yet what unify them all are the two “essential” geometries that combine to paint the four-dimensional fractal beings of the Universe, spatial energy and temporal information. And this is what fractal theorists9 mean by a Universe made of fractal energy and information. In simple mathematical terms, if we call energy e and information I, we can then write the generator equation of all the fractal beings of the Universe as a feed-back cycle that transforms energy into information back and forth, generating all its space-times. And that fractal equation is nothing else than the principle of conservation of energy and information quoted before in this book: All what exists is a fractal being that transforms back and forth energy into information: e< =>Tƒ. We don’t need to go in this book in complex mathematical analysis, as we are interested in explaining the simplest fractal networks of quarks that form black holes and quark stars. Notice though the difference of the two mathematical symbols of the previous equation: The symbol that gathers together space particles is a sum, which means that space particles form “waves,” loosely organized that move around a field of energy in which they feed. The symbol used for informative particles is a multiplication symbol, which means informative particles form networks, “knots.” For example, in a neuronal network, each particle is fixed and connected to many other particles. The result is that a network of informative cells can form a “mirror,” which can reflect an “image” that “gauges” reality into a language and so it can create a “mind.” The result indeed is that herds of lineal, moving particles “absorb” energy and move, and knots of cyclical information, gauge and perceive. Further on, knots can be broken in their connections so Tƒ networks can become herds of energy by losing its “connective dimension” and vice versa. When mathematics evolved, those symbols evolved. So instead of sums and multiplications, modern physics use differential and integral equations to describe energy and information; and then in the twentieth century, we use fractal equations for information or chaotic equations for entropy. All this is a more complex view needed to explain the behavior of electronic nebulae that sometimes act as a network (and indeed your mind is basically a mirror image made with electronic nebulae) and sometimes as a wave-flow. This is the ultimate meaning of duality. So all can exist in two states in many different scales: masses or charges or clocks or heads are all species of information, but they swim over a field or body of energy and sometimes gauge information and sometimes move. What then creates the stability of the Universe? A fundamental law of the Universe called invariance of its motions, forms, and scales. The three invariances of the Universe are the invariance of motion proved by Einstein, the invariance of scale proved by Nottale, and the invariance of form proved in this blog. They are the three principles that hold together and explain the self-similarity of all the species of the Universe. In other words, while there are infinite different species of energy and information, their “shapes” are invariant in any scale and their motions (perception of shape as movement) are also invariant. In the graph, informative clocks of time are cyclical and surfaces of energy are lineal to maximize their functions: informative systems resemble a spiral or sphere since those geometries store maximum information in minimum space, accumulating its cycles/cells in the informative dimension of height, from black holes to heads and nervous systems. Bites and bodies of energy resemble the line or plane since that opposite geometrical form covers the shortest distance between two points, the maximum extension with minimum volume, accumulated in the width dimension as space. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the bodies and heads of humans, animals, or machines because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information. Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between two points and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms because cycles store maximal information in minimal space. For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common, but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like the missile. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines. And those chips order bodies of metal with digital information. C-SPEED as a galactic NOT cosmic limit. Relativity of c-speed. The first thing we have to understand is what it is really the ‘abstract graph of pen and paper’ Newton considered the background God draw Not Descartes, behind the equations of reality, he added on it. In the galaxy we live in, where we make ALL our measures, the vacuum space IS light space-time, a background radiation of LIGHT. So LIGHT is the ‘abstract’ graph but IT IS A LOCAL light space-time, because inside black holes there is darkness – light is not; and outside galaxies there is darkness, hardly any light crosses the halo of galaxies. So it is OBVIOUS that as you cannot in a very fast river stream run faster, the more so if you are a heavy particle; you cannot go faster than c-light in the galactic river. Moreover, as your mind IS ELECTRONIC, and we have clarify that WE STOP AS PARTICLES TO PERCEIVE information, when two electronic atoms MEASURE light, they have FIRST entangled in ‘stillness’, then sent each other a light beam but AS THEY ARE in a fractal Universe STOPPED in relationship to each other – THEY MEASURE ALWAYS C-LIGHT SPEED, they do NOT add THEIR slow macroscopic speed, as PERCEPTION HAPPENS in the quantum scale, in STILLNESS. Alas, THE CONUNDRUM OF c-speed constancy, and the limit of c-speed within galaxies IS solved. The rest of relativity consists IN calculating from the perspective of the macro-system that SEEMS to be moving, the still c-speed of the microsystem of particles, communicating with each other in stillness. All this said, as I know the reader, if any will be a man who ‘idolises’ the high popes of physics, our ‘present seers’ of time, and will like to know what all this has to do with his ‘dogma-theory’ (4D relativity and quantum physics); all what we say just widens and explains better the weirdness and limits of 4D relativity (which is just the study of 2 specific planes of the 5D scalar Universe, the light space-time plane in special relativity and the gravitational larger russian doll in general relativity). And so we do ‘revis(it)e’ Relativity in the more specialised 4th line articles to show how it fits as a ‘smaller theory’ of a part of the whole scalar Universe, which goes beyond its limits of space-time (c-speed as the rod of measure of ‘constant space’, T=0 temperature of time-motion) beyond the galaxy (hyperluminal speeds=actions at distance in regions where there is NOT a background light space-time) and the black hole (an accelerated time vortex that should go beyond c-speed and 0 temperature past the event horizon). Those obvious, increasingly proved experimental facts that widen the limits of relativity beyond the galaxy, are poised to be accepted as faster than z=c speed jets of matter coming out of black holes in galaxies become overwhelming (they already are, as the third picture above at 10c shows, but lacking the 5D formalism astrophysicists prefer to deny facts for lack of models and elaborate bizarre arguments to deny those faster than c-speeds). All this said we must also stress that 5D² IS a theory that applies to all ‘stiences’ and scales, as each science merely studies a scale of size, and ALL of them are equally important. The time cycles of life or history are NOT less important than those of quantum particles. So the reader MUST understand that the primacy of physicists IS cultural, as the makers of weapons, the tools of power, and machines, the idols of our technological civilisation. But on pure theoretical, modelling basis, we shall NOT keep their idolised position as the ‘seers of time’, more important in its time=motion analysis that let us say, Darwin who study motion=change in the information of life, or Kondratieff, which study the cycles of evolution of machines in economics, or Spengler who studied the life and death of organic civilisations. If anything less important as we do NOT move=chance at light speed, and the 2Dimension of motion is for us far less important than the 0-1Dimension of ‘genesis’ and perceptive information. Let us be clear from the beginning. Quantum physics is exactly as thermodynamics and fluid dynamics is. The difference is on the dual human treatment which FORCED a formalism called TIME Probability to study the FASTER time species, which according to 5D metric accelerate its world cycles the smaller they are ( x ð = K). So smaller systems are better treated with its time ceteris paribus analysis as elements of the 0-1 unit sphere of normalized probabilities than as populations in space, in the 1-∞ plane. Mathematically both are equivalent. The formalism differs because of its different time speed in 5D metric.

What this means is that the o-1 probability time sphere of quantum physics is equivalent to the 1-∞ spatial population of thermodynamic molecules (Measure theory).

So quantum physics in the o-1 sphere is really equivalent to statistical mechanics on the 1-∞ plane, which should have been a better formalism, as it avoids renormalizations and all the attached complicated calculi.

Only in the S=T reflection mirror of non-Æ logic both formalisms are different by choosing a single side of the mirror: thermodynamics uses its spatial mirror and the quantum formalism its temporal mirror.

All languages including mathematical formalisms, as pure mirrors of information are inflationary. So in the same manner words have metaphors for the same object, mathematical informative languages have 2 dual equivalent formalisms:

S@ (spatial populations: thermodynamic ensembles) ≈ ∆ð (temporal probabilities: quantum physics).

Then once we chose the temporal, more complicated formalism and interpretation of things got more complex, as when Ptolemy chose a different perspective, that of the humind (@), with Earth at the center, instead of the Sun, and things got complicated, the complexity of it paradoxically enthrones its experts as gurus of the sacred knowledge. Both formalisms in a Universe absolutely relative in which each perspective can give us a partial view of the event are equivalent, but as the more ‘objective’, larger view is that of the sun in the center – since the sun inputs more its point of view in the final gravitational outcome of the solar system, the solar view is more self-centered and simple. If we have to adapt reality to the distorted, subjective human point of view, our maths become more complex.

Copernicus thus simplified the maths by reseting the ‘formalism’ to the one with higher truth. And likely with the proper ad ons of 5D a statistical formalism for quantum systems could be achieved to simplify and unify both disciplines. As we can unify the jargons of electromagnetism and gravitation, with the simplified vortex concepts of the principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass (or charge) and its unification equations.

Yet given the routines and huge load of technological uses for quantum and electromagnetism obviously we are stuck with the jargons – if we have not even been able to change the ± symbols of charges to the more proper ‘electron-positive dominant electric force’, proton-negative… image 7.5 billion practitioners rewriting its university books.

Yet at least quantum and electromagnetic theorists and models should acknowledge a sounder first principle system than the one they sponsor today (none in fact).

And yet the simplest image is that taken from the perspective of the fractal element that inputs more ‘existential force, e x i=st, to the system we are studying.  In quantum physics the temporal view thus becomes more natural as the fastest world cycles of its particles and exchanges are fulfilled often several times within a measure, acting the whole sum of processes in time in parallel to our perception of them as full ‘closed circles’ imprinting space, since we observe multiple ‘reproductions of form’ obtained in the world cycles, in a single experiment.

Plus we have not committed in quantum physics the erroneous need of using a single point of view as ptolemy did.

WHAT IS THEN a way to measure a higher truth in any system of multiple p.o.v.s? Simply: A biological darwinian parameter – the stronger system with more existential ‘momentum’ (Max. S xT) dominates and makes reality turn in the simplest fashion around its point of view. As the Sun has more gravitational force it really becomes the ‘simpler center’. To pretend the earth is the center makes a more distorted, complex view. Power simplifies its territory to reach within it a clear order.

Ideally then millions of humans should re-write in terms of Broglie>Bohmian Mechanics and statistical populations in the 1-∞ plane quantum physics avoiding the cumbersome, huge processes of renormalization, reduction to the 0-1 sphere of all data of particles that makes quantum so ‘hard’ to practice. We won’t do this here. I did start the process a few decades ago but as T.œ is so extensive and I have so many chaotic events in my life I aborted the job. Others will finish. Though it is unlikely that routine changes and simplifies the model and rewrites one hundred years of texts. So we just shall explain a few details and comment on some equations. What matters really is the ‘philosophy of it’: quantum mechanics is just another scale, the less perceived, the most deformed in the formalism, the most exhausted by historic reasons of our technological civilization based in electronic machines.

A second fundamental element is then the fractal parallelism between the atom and the galaxy, the electron and the halo, the electromagnetic force and the star, the black holes as a top quark star, and the proton; which again is also a question of formalism. By making in this case 3 inflationary mathematical models we have divided and obscured those isomorphisms. The simplest is Newton’s time vortices, the dynamic view; the more detailed is Einstein’s EFE, the spatial formal view of still simultaneous pictures of the whole field, but derived through Poisson’s gradients of Newton. So they are the same. And the second jargon is that of quantum vortices, charges, with a more complex formalism. So the way to unify them is TO SIMPLIFY Electromagnetic vortices with Newtonian vortices, and we get a rough equivalence and a rough unification equation for all mass vortices that proves indeed the atom is self-similar to the galaxy. And this cast a ‘view’ on the atom within, as we can see it from our infinitesimal view outside in the galaxy, where each star is a photon…

This also implies that outside the galaxy the gravitational force, which is equivalent to the strong force does not work. It is weaker, more expansive, entropic, hence it is dark entropy, and expands space and it is weaker in the attraction between Galaxies, which explains all the conundrums of cosmology.

So those are the great insights of  SCALES, ∆st in ∆-3: quantum physics->∆-2:Electromagnetic charges-∆o: thermodynamics-∆+1:Gravitation-Dark entropy

As we said, we are not going to do the whole formalism that would take me a year or so to put it professionally from my notebooks based on Lindau’s 11 book encyclopedia of physics annotated in my youth but what matters to us is the philosophy of science behind the proper understanding of quantum physics.

DE BROGLIE THEORY.

FIRST to set the record straight the REAL genius of quantum physics, NOT Bohr, Born and Heisenberg, Not Bohm but the French lonely aristocrat -wrong culture, wrong attitude, forgotten and stolen.

1927: De Broglie publishes ‘Wave mechanics and the atomic structure of matter and of radiation’,  (1927). Paper contains full modern pilot-wave dynamics, though only for single particles. “One will assume the existence, as distinct realities, of the material point and of the

continuous wave represented by the function Ψ, and one will take it as a postulate

that the motion of the point is determined as a function of the phase of the wave

by the equation v = − 1/M0 (∇S + e/cA ). One then conceives the continuous wave mo c as guiding the motion of the particle. It is a pilot wave.”

De Broglie presents the main results of his Journal de Physique et le Radium paper, but now for a nonrelativistic system of N particles guided by a wave function Ψ in configuration space that determines the particle velocities according to de Broglie’s law of motion. The theory published in the Proceedings is absolutely pilot-wave dynamics as we know it today. De Broglie’s presentation at the Solvay conference:

Begins by reviewing his early Ph.D. thesis work: showed E and p determined by phase of an associated wave: E = ∂S/∂t, p = −∇S. Implies principles of least action and Fermat identical. Quantization conditions appear in natural way. Far reaching implications for statistical mechanics.

Then outlines Schrodinger’s work, who had set out to derive a wave equation for de Broglie’s phase waves. Louis notes wave equation constructed so phase S of Ψ-function is solution of Hamilton-Jacobi equation in geometrical-optics limit (Lecture 2); Schrodinger identifies particles with localized wave packets.

Problem with Schrodinger: it ‘seems a little paradoxical to construct a configuration space with the coordinates of points that do not exist’. Proposes they do exist, and motivates guidance equations since phase of Ψ obeys Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical limit:

“We propose to assume by induction that this [velocity] formula is still valid when the old Mechanics is no longer sufficient, that is to say when S is no longer a solution of the Jacobi equation. If one accepts this hypothesis, which appears justified by its consequences, the [relativistic guidance equation] completely determines the motion of the corpuscle as soon as one is given its position at an initial instant. In other words the function S, just like the Jacobi function of which it is the generalization, determines a whole class of motions, and to know which of these motions is actually described it suffices to know the initial position.”

Shows distribution |Ψ|² of particles preserved in time (‘equivariance’). Derives the Born rule for probabilities. His expression ‘probabilite de presence’ makes it clear he means probability for electron being somewhere, not just probability of finding it there in a suitable measurement.

Generalizes dynamics for many-body case. Says difficult to construct wave Ψ that can generate motion of relativistic many-body system (easy for one-body case). Thus difficulty of formulating fundamentally Lorentz-invariant many-body pilot-wave theory recognized from the beginning.

Stresses wave Ψ appears as both a pilot wave and a probability wave. There are thus no grounds for abandoning determinism, and in this his theory differs from that of Mr. Born.

Notes in passing can write dynamics in classical F = ma form with quantum potential term (as Bohm did in 1952), but considers equation for velocity to be fundamental equation of motion.

Applications: scattering of single particle by fixed-potential. Interference and diffraction of photons. Pressure exerted by light on a mirror. Stationary states of hydrogen atom. Calculate of electron velocity during atomic transition; such transitions visualizable without ‘quantum jumps’.

Presentation concludes with lengthy discussion of recent experiments involving diffraction, interference, and scattering of electrons. For diffraction of electrons by crystal lattice, points out scattered wave function has maxima in certain directions, and notes pilot-wave theory says electrons preferentially scattered in these directions. Referring to scattering maxima observed recently by Davisson and Germer, for electrons incident on a crystal, he says “There is direct numerical confirmation of the formulas of the new Dynamics. . . ”Discussion following de Broglie’s (Tuesday) presentation extensive, detailed and varied. Our man replies satisfactorily to most queries. Conference concludes on Saturday with General Discussion, during which theory continues to be extensively debated. However, Pauli has an objection… Soon the Wolfpack around Bohr destroyed his work. It is though still the proper interpretation.

“And so we conclude that the dualist representation by corpuscles and associated waves allows us now to see the non-relativistic quantum theory as just statistical mechanics with a different (quantum) dynamics.” BROGLIE, Solvay

Clarifications on what position-particle vs. motion-wave means from 5D.

Position is very much a particle property – particles can be located precisely. Waves, on the other hand, have no precise location, but they do have momentum. The immediate thought is obvious: particles are the stop-informative state of the being, its ‘head’ that does not move relatively to the Universe it perceives in stillness. Waves are its body part that moves the still particle. A quantum system thus is equivalent to any other system of the Universe. And this exactly what we see, but refuse to understand under the ego px. of the ‘Hilbert’s’ idealist school of German physics and its disciples (Bohr, Heisenberg, Born). So the main differences of quantum and all other scales is indeed the limits of perception of the human being. Among them uncertainty is merely the natural loss of information when we try to perceive two opposite, inverse elements, form-position-space-particle-information vs. motion-translation-time-wave-energy.

A fast classic review on the realist theory of quantum physics.

In the graph, the slit experiment does not clarify fully if actually the particle exists through the period of motion of the system transported by the wave, but if so it will have a determined path, logically on the region of maximal density of its body, which is given by the amplitude square of the wave. No need then for fancy further paradoxes. In case of the particle not existing, the stop and go, particle-wave duality will be sequential. On my view the particle does exist but it is the submissive smaller state in boson waves which are dominant 3D systems on contact with the quantum potential, the ∆-1 desegregated entropic state of its minimal components. While the particle ‘shrinks’ part of the wave-potential into a 2D sphere which becomes therefore the definition  of a particle as a substance of a 1 dimension less than the wave of energy it encloses. As such the particle being a less dimensional element can also be defined by its momentum.

However the momentum differs in the sense that mass, the enclosure particle of the larger reality of gravitational quantum potential waves at 10.000 (open still to argument) IS NOT real for particle points, where the momentum is given by ih, the similar mass-factor on the operator of momentum for quantum waves. This is in fact related to the charge (the equivalent to the mass vortex or star density within the galaxy), distribution around the atom, which forms the density cloud of charge we call an electron. So mass must not be considered and at all moments to be changed by the ih factor of schrodinger’s momentum operator which is the equivalent to mass in the quantum real (its active magnitude). Itself a spherical rotary density of change which has however null effect on the form of the quantum field it does not distort, and so is intrinsically neutral, extrinsically charged.

So we can reinterpret the schrodinger equation as the definition of the momentum of the wave, where ih is the angular momentum, which acts as the envelop of the wave or mass factor, and the wave speed depends on the two elements of position and speed, obviously related to the two elements of the right side, the potential/position energy and the kinetic lineal time speed.

This is then just a different plane and much of the confusion happens by making relevant by routine the mass element of our higher Universe which comes into view likely latter around the weight of the dark matter quarks (heavy atoms in our Universe). H then BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF MASS and  K boltzman in the energy equations, is accompanied by the frequency equation to write a simple 5D scalar metric:

∆-1: $³d (Potential volume) – 1D ƒ ∆º: ð =∆+1: K ²d(1D scalar: Active magnitude value) What matters us though more is the conceptual error of dealing with mass in the field of ih-angular momentum as the meaning of mass. So then particles anti gravitate in the sense that mass here is ih and so they are density charges that change symbol from repulsive to attractive, as we must ‘NOT use the concept of mass’ but angular momentum h, as the operator of both lineal and angular momentum, relate it to charge which is the active magnitude here, mass being expelled from the real of intrinsic properties of quantum systems. What about the spin: The charge conjugation operator commutes with the spin operators, so the antiparticle always has the same spin as the particle. The Rashomon effect though gives us another real reason why the spins are the same. The spin, or any other quantum numbers of the antiparticle has to be the same with that of the particle, in order for them to be able to establish Lorentz invariance in the presence of conserved charges. I have not though clear that the spin values IN WHICH a particle can change do not equate to a non-conservation rule for spins but for all the Universe entangled only. In any case the potential and particle state must be put then from Bohm’s model to complete the description of the quantum wave: Bohmian mechanics differentiates: Upper right: A 2D polar, particle, enclosing a 3D quantum potential field, whose quanta density, amplitude squared, ψ x ψ*, determine the positions of those particles that move enclosing them, as envelopes of the quantum potential. Lower right: A time dependent moving wave state expressed with energy Hamiltonians What, exactly, does Bohmian mechanics say? It describes the motion of N point particles in the usual three-space. Every particle i has at every time t some definite position Q (t) R3. The motion obeys the first-order differential equation above right. where Im means the imaginary part, mi is the mass of particle i, and is a time-dependent complex-valued function on the configuration space R³ that satisfies Schrodinger’s equation (below). The particle-potential state above is the key new feature. So the Bohmian answer to ‘‘wave or particle?’’ is ‘‘wave and particle! Bohmian mechanics has in common with classical theories that it tells us a clear story about what’s happening. On the other hand, as we will soon see, Bohmian mechanics is in perfect agreement with all probabilistic predic We do assume that the wave function is differentiable except perhaps at a few exceptional configurations For all times. For a reasonably large class of potentials including Coulomb, there is a dense Hilbert subspace differentiable for all times. But the equation of motion is ill-defined for all nodes, that is, zeros, of the wave function.So our trajectory when (Q1(t),…,QN(t)) runs into a node, the equation of motion has a unique global solution that is, for all t there is a ‘‘probability one’’ and Bohmian trajecto-ries never run into the singularities of the velocity field, that is, the nodes and the points where the wave function is not differentiable. A corollary of this agreement is that Bohmian mechanics is confirmed by experience. In particular, the mere existence of Bohmian mechanics proves that the usually assumed nonexistence of tra- jectories cannot be concluded from experiment. The wave function is not merely square integrable, WHICH GIVES it a lower scale, but is differentiable which means it has an upper plane. The natural measure for counting initial configura- tions that is, for talking about the size of a set of initial configurations for the equation of motion with wave function ψ=(t 0) is q1 ,…,|ψ (qN,0)²d³N q, 3 where d³ q is the volume measure on configuration space. The measure 3 defines a measure on the set of solution curves (Q1(t),…,QN(t)) of the equation of motion. For every measure on configuration space, the dynamics will transport its density function (q1 ,…,qN ,t) according to the continuity equation: If we start with the volume measure, that is, ρ=1, at some time, the measure will cease to be the volume measure at other times. So, when starting with the volume measure, you arbitrarily prefer some point in time. Not so with the measure in Eq. 3 . The measure |ψ(0)²d³N q is transported by the dynamics to the measure |ψ(t)|² d³Nq. This can be easily checked by deriving the continuity equation: from the Schrodinger equation. It means that the Bohmian velocity (h /mi) Im(∇ iψ / ψ) equals ji/|ψ|² , where j is the probability current density for particle i) of the wave function, We can derive the collapse if we consider a ‘‘measurement’’ with only two possible outcomes shrinking the wave function of the universe, ψ=ψ, reducing the mass-function to the wave function The founders of quantum mechanics were much attracted by the thought that the words ‘‘momentum,’’ ‘‘energy,’’ and ‘‘angular momentum’’ still have a meaning in quantum mechanics. These words, however, don’t have an immediate meaning as ‘mass’ but as HG constant, in contrast to ‘‘position,’’ which does because it is a pure space-ultimate meaning; their meaning in Newtonian mechanics comes from the fact that they are conserved quantities in the macrocosmic scale. Without this fact, nobody would be interested in multiplying mass by velocity. So in the lower scale they relate to the conserved H-planck quantity. In a Newtonian world, they would have measured the Newtonian value of momentum, energy, or angular momentum, respectively. You might define mQ ̇ as the actual momentum IN Quantum but it is meaningless because it is not a conserved quantity as m doesn’t work at that level, so we define <ψ|(-ih)=∇|ψ> as the actual momentum which is a conserved quantity as long as translation invariance is satisfied. What about spin in Bohmian mechanics? We can replace the Schrodinger equation by the Pauli equation and our particle equation by: where s is the spin index. It is understood that all functions (ψ s and its derivatives) are evaluated at the actual configuration. So, there is no ‘‘actual spin vector. The spin is rather a property of the wave function. Identical particles has still a wave function antisymmetric for fermions and symmetric for bosons with the same equation of motion. Something else: The ground state of the hydrogen atom is a real-valued wave function. So, the Bohmian electron does not move. It stands still. To fully grasp this we must therefore first understand what particles and waves are in the context of 5D² In graph group velocity is particle (ab.•) speed as it surrounds the wave (≈), whose phase velocity is V≈≥V• The wave is surrounded by the particle which is encircling it. The creational process of reproductive dimensions thus starts at its minimal scale departing from a dot that becomes a 1D line, which a wave spreads=smears but a particle orders by closing in, surrounding and fixing the waves, which start a forth and back process that decelerates it and finally stops it into standing particle points, able to gauge information as still minds. And then again the bouncing within the particle enclosure of the wave, increases its information through ∑superpositions of fourier transforms, stopping, now rotating, now stopping to create a 3D ball; and so growth is reproduction as motion is. Waves that move and become the group vital energy for the particle to stop and perceive. And so the whole moves as a group particle, and each of the inner standing waves back and fourth as a phase particle, which is in its limit taking 3 steps back and forth for each 2 steps of the particle, 2/3 being the classic harmony between the speed of the wave back and fourth and the reproductive motion of the particle forwards stopping forwards. Then mathematically this shows in the imaginary back negative moment of the wave and the positive, reproductive doubling of the particle. The fact is the best explanation of motion is one of reproduction of information, which requires a constant stop, reproduce your information in the next region of space-time, go… sliding and converting motion in yet another form of reproduction, which becomes then the fundamental ‘nature’ of reality – a fractal that reproduces information. And we shall return to that key insight. In the graph, the particle is basically the angular-momentum/cyclical enclosure of a wave of vital energy with a lineal overall motion, whose ‘intensity’ is measured as a height-width in the dimension of forward motion of the system. The wave/particle relationship was first understood rightly by Broglie’s in term of inner clocks, which are synchronized between the ‘particle enclosure’ and its group speed which is twice that of the wave phase speed, in reverse fashion to waves where the particle does not truly form at its ∆º scale (sea waves where the particle has 1/2 speed). (Coulomb force) +(centrifugal force)= 0? The centrifugal force is, in general, -mx ̈. So m x ̈ =(Coulomb force). This relation is precisely Newtonian mechanics, and we can experimentally test Newtonian against Bohmian mechanics. Suppose a particle is confined between two impermeable walls. Its wave function is a multiple of eˆikx+ eˆ- ikx, where k is chosen so that the wave function vanishes at the walls. Again, the Bohmian particle stands still. Quantum mechanics says the momentum is, up to small corrections, either k or k, so the particle can’t be at rest. But the word ‘‘momentum’’ doesn’t have here the same meaning, as it is not mass but h and hence charge distribution. The trajectory of the Bohmian particle in your experiment looks like this: it is a smooth curve t->X(t) which is constant, X(t)=x0 , before the walls are removed and which is asymptotic to the line X(t)≈k/m)t +constant if x0 lies right of the center, and asymptotic to the line X ( t )≈-k/m)t +constant if x0 lies left of the center. Each of these two cases occurs with probability 1/2. So the particle slowly accelerates until it reaches the velocity ±k/k/m Bohmian mechanics says the wave function is something like a physical field. But, physical fields are always functions on three-space, not on configuration space. Probability densities are functions on configuration space. The Maxwell and the gravity fields are functions on three-space, as they are in our scale but this doesn’t mean every physical field is a function on three-space in lower planes with many more information dimensions. So existence of actual particle positions is no longer a metaphysical question but a physical reality. While in Newtonian mechanics the dynamics of the point particles is determined by a second order differential equation in which F(Q) is a force field, e.g, derived from a potential field V as F(Q) = −∇V, in Bohmian mechanics the point particles dynamics is given by a first order differential equation dQt =vΨ(Qt), where vΨ = (v1Ψ, …, vNΨ ) is a velocity field on the configuration space. This fields is generated by the wave function Ψ which itself evolves according to Schrodinger’s equation i h ̄ ∂ Ψ/∂t = H Ψ , where H is the Hamiltonian, e.g., given, for non relativistic spinless particles. The velocity field is determined by reasons of simplicity and symmetry V (Ψk)= h ̄ /mk Im [∇kΨ/ Ψ] (with the wave function playing somehow the role of “potential field” for the velocity field). The factor ̄h/m comes from the requirement of Galilei invariance, the imaginary part is a consequence of invariance for time reversal, the gradient is from rotational invariance and the fact that one has to divide for Ψ derives from the homogeneity of degree zero of the velocity field—the fact that a quantum state is a ray in Hilbert space. If there is a magnetic field B = rotA, ∇k should represent the covariant derivative associated with the vector potential A. But, as there is no way of testing Bohmian mechanics against orthodox quantum mechanics experimentally, how do we know the trajectories exist? In fact, I don’t. But, that’s not a tragedy. The global existence of Bohmian dynamics has been proven with full mathematical rigor where it has been shown that for a large class of Schrodinger Hamiltonians, including Coulomb potential V with arbitrary charges and masses, and sufficiently regular initial datum ψ0 the solution exists uniquely and globally in time for |ψ0|²-almost all initial configurations Q0. Thus left Equations form a complete specification of the theory. Without any other axiom, all the phenomena governed by nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, from spectral lines and quantum interference experiments to scattering theory, superconductivity and quantum computation follow from the analysis of the dynamical system defined by them. The above assumption, which guarantees agreement between Bohmian mechanics and quantum mechanics regarding the results of any experiment, is what has been called the quantum equilibrium hypothesis: when a system has a wave function ψ, its configuration Q is random with probability distribution given by ρ(q) = |ψ(q)|². While the meaning and justification of this hypothesis—which should be regarded as a local manifestation of a global quantum equilibrium state of our universe—is a delicate matter. Bohmian mechanics is a counterexample to all of the claims to the effect that a deterministic theory cannot account for quantum randomness in the familiar statistical mechanical way, as arising from averaging over ignorance: Bohmian mechanics is clearly a deterministic theory, and, as we have just explained, it does account for quantum randomness as arising from averaging over ignorance given by |ψ(q)|2. It is important to realize that non simply Bohmian mechanics makes the same predictions as does orthodox quantum theory for the results of any experiment, but that the quantum formalism of operators as observables emerges naturally and simply from it as the very ex- pression of the empirical import of Bohmian mechanics. More precisely, it turns out that in Bohmian mechanics self-adjoint operators arise in association with specific experiments as a tool to compactly express and represent the relevant data—the results and their statistical distributions—of these experiments. We are then interested in the interpretation that fully agrees with the isomorphic laws of 5D. LIGHT GENERATION THEORY. Particles and waves interact in that sense closely depending on their relative speeds of its inner clocks, and in quantum physics the particle is the dominant, faster element. Its double speed means it can return back to the point of origin to ‘enclose’ the wave which ‘bumps’ on it, moving the particle fully formed, but also allowing standing waves shot back and forth by the faster particle enclosure. The wave thus is the motion of the system, the particle the informative enclosure that regulates that motion and absorbs energy from the wave. And the potential below the wave a faster than c, invisible, likely gravitational, likely neutrino-background (if the neutrino is a graviton, which needs to work out the problem of spin numbers and accept Broglie’s neutrino theory of light). Now the question here is rather simple: De broglie>Jordan theory of neutrino as the origin of light requires that the entangled particles communicate through a graviton neutrino that acts as the string that joins them initially, which vibrates to create the light element: In this reality then all comes to the simple realization that neutrinos are gravitons, faster than light that act as the communication particles between stop and go photons and electrons and as such they create quantum entanglement, and carry information only of distance with therefore a wave speed likely infinite if we measure it by the angle of the wave-of information (even a water wave has infinite speed if we measure only the distance ‘element’ between its ‘touching with minimal angle’. Now roughly we can consider the string to have superluminal speed, the weak angle of the neutrino to be similar to that of the string and speed of the particle proportional to the weak angle in inverse fashion, giving us for this weak angle of ‘amplitude’ of the neutrino minimal wave a superluminal speed. All what is then needed is to try to work out how a neutrino can have 2 graviton spin. This is difficult. A way to do it is to consider Neutrinos come in four groups, and so the waving of the electromagnetic field happens when 2 neutrinos come and go (antineutrinos and neutrinos being the same particle at faster than c speeds) in two back and forth paths creating the electric and magnetic disturbance as they inform both particles. It is also possible to alternatively consider that is one particle of 2 spins so initially that spin is not conserved in entropic weak reaction of growth or diminution in scales (but overall conserved in the total sum of all those scales). The neutrino does becomes converted only with spin 2 when added to the 0 scalar larger scale of the boson Higgs which is then the symmetry broken from the Universe of light space-time of spin 1 = Upper scale of larger wholes – o spin of Higgs + 2 lower scale of neutrinos, /2 (split symmetry) = 1 mean spin of light space-time. Other solution being not giving spin at all to the neutrino which has then some further advantages as it will be establishing a 0 spin universe. And finally there is the problem of massive neutrinos when gravitons are postulated not to have mass, but then again they should and contribute to the mass enclosure – but the mass enclosure is NOT the neutrino particle. There is then a lot of open possibilities and as nobody truly explores 5D physics the field is yet open. In any choice of alternative Universes where the spin is not conserved this is not in 5D an aberration as quantities are generally not conserved in the same format between planes – they evolve into something else. So it should not as it is the angular momentum of perception of the singularity, which essentially disappears with the singularity. So those are things we hint at but don’t know for sure. It is though to me more of a quantitative question as the qualitative laws of 5D preclude that all those things come together, so we talk of hyperluminal gravitational string neutrinos mediating the quantum potential, regardless of what they do with its spin. As it might have none, and so this explains better why after all we do not perceive it. And then neutrino fields should collapse into Higgs fields – the upper view of the duality that encloses us: Higgs fields, minimal dimensionality mass enclosure (∆+1): o spin < Particles 1/2: Electromagnetic energy: 1 Spin : Particles (1/2) > Neutrino potentials (∆-1): 2 spin Maximal dimensionality. Now when one has a ‘view’ of reality that differs so greatly as that of the pioneers, Planck, Broglie, Einstein and Schrodinger of modern physics, which are all realist in its interpretation vs. a latter view by other group, which is neither pioneer nor realist (Hilbert’s school of Bohr, Born and Heisenberg), it would have been wise to go for the realist pioneers. And indeed they were right. As a pioneer I know though Humans have an astounding incapacity to take the right path. So we stick here to the realist view, which is as the name indicates ‘real’. We need just to extend 5D metric beyond the light space-time scale, and postulate a quantum potential which is the lower scale, we know to exist between galaxies, of dark entropy (not energy, as we see it as scattering paths for redshift death of tired light extended in space-speed). How far this scale goes is not fully measured. But some advances show clearly a 10.000 quantum potential speed, which is in accordance with our Unification equation relationship between Mass-curvature, angular momentum which grows in squares and radius – distance – invisible potential which grows in cubes CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE:RELATIVITY ≈ QUANTUM AS LIMIT OF 5∆ METRIC “The whole question is to know if one has the right to assume the wave Ψ to be limited laterally in configuration space. If one has this right, the velocity of the representative point of the system will have a constant value, and will correspond to a stationary state of the rotator, as soon as the waves diffracted by the φ-axis will have separated from the incident beam. One can say that it is not possible to assume the incident beam to be limited laterally, because Fermi’s configuration space is formed by the superposition of identical layers of height 2π in the direction of the φ-axis; in other words, two points of configuration space lying on the same parallel to the φ-axis and separated by a whole multiple of 2π represent the same state of the system. In my opinion, this proves above all the artificial character of configuration spaces, and in particular of that which one obtains here by rolling out along a line the cyclic variable φ.” DE BROGLIE So we define the whole range of scales for all entities in existence, as the ‘5th dimension proper’ of ALL THE PLANES of existence of reality each one studied by a stience, according to size, which Superorganisms of space-time only explore directly as ternary ∆±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the cellular, ∆-1 (atomic, individual), organic (∆º: magnetic/thermodynamic or cultural in physical and social systems) and ∆+1 ecosystemic (gravitational world in physical social systems). For all planes together however we need to define a more objective view, through the analysis of its 5D metric, which is the mathematical expression for the equation of motion in a given dimension of time. And as they are inverse, we actually need a metric that pegs them together. We can assess the existence of a scalar dimension in all systems, because indeed, in any system, including the galaxy and the biological organism, the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size is co-invariant:$t x ð§=K

Whereas K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the co-invariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).

It is important to realize that non simply Bohmian mechanics makes the same predictions as does orthodox quantum theory for the results of any experiment, but that the quantum formalism of operators as observables emerges naturally and simply from it as the very ex- pression of the empirical import of Bohmian mechanics. More precisely, it turns out that in Bohmian mechanics self-adjoint operators arise in association with specific experiments as a tool to compactly express and represent the relevant data—the results and their statistical distributions—of these experiments.

We are then interested in the interpretation that fully agrees with the isomorphic laws of 5D.

So far, we shall consider here as a better introduction to the theme, what the Correspondence Principle has already done in realist quantum interpretation, which should be the standard way to teach it on universities, BB- Broglie’s-Bohm’s pilot-wave theory.

The right path: Leibniz>Einstein>Bohm>5•D³

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this. Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality. Consider a simple case: quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ. So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’. And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles.

This is the essence of the relational space-time model I developed and is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion.

So since we have come forward explaining the meaning of H-planck constant of time-information in the quantum scale, let us finish the task started by Einstein of debunking the ‘mathematical, mental theory of quantum physics’, the so called:

Copenhagen (erroneous) interpretation…

In the graph above a simplex explanation o both models, below, the obvious homology between particles moving in a bidimensional holographic quantum potential, gravitational field and a particle moving in the surface of a liquid.

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982)

We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego. The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.

Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is.

It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it. Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so, humans will. Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm. But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state. Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, the only hidden variables on the argument between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudo-religious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed not-evident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from wave-format to particle-field state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wave-present state or past-future field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism. So by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light space-time (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together, GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations. The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so. I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long. So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the big-bang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (big-bang), in space (quantum-cosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, A-men. We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind. Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space. How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future. Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past. Uncertainty, non-locality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity. There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: non-locality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality: • It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”. • It is also obvious that in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale. • Finally abounding on the uncertainty of measure, because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, non-local, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all. Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eye-mind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slow-motion as clearly different rays. This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D. The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ non-local IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, non-local, co-existing at the same time-quanta’. The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, non-local in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ non-local as they could not even measure its speed. Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure. Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen. Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger. After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL. Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed. The mind, its beliefs, distortions, limits of perception DO influence knowledge both at individual and cultural level as we have seen. AND THIS is the only conclusion about ‘Physicists philosophical worldview’ – the three fundamental concepts of their philosophy of the Universe, the big-bang origin of timespace, the entropy only arrow of time and the limits of scales in quantum physics and its anthropomorphic theory of the observer ‘creating it’ are PLAINLY false, childish errors not worth the quality of its analysis of motions and physical systems. It is however a ‘canonical falsehood’ of human thought today when religious power has been displaced by mechanical, physical power, as we moved from societies ruled by religious warrior kings who ‘believed’ in the ‘grace of God’ to hold their position, to military societies who ‘believed’ in physicists’ entropic weapons as their tool of power, to accept physicists as the high popes, not philosophers of science. Since power imposes truth not reason, and so today entropic, big-bang explosions and quantum observers rule the Universe; regardless of the anthropomorphic non scientific distortions they impose. So all what we can tell them is ‘stick to your guns’. Physics was in the XIX c. described as the science of (entropic) motion and that is what you do. It is your speciality but you cannot HYPERBOLICALLY EXPAND its notions to all realities and pretend motions of entropy is the meaning of it all, the Universe was born of an entropic explosion and man is the only being that understands it all since its mind actually creates (with mathematics) reality. The upgrading of physics in that regard passes through this blog and its upgrading of its foundational concepts, cyclical time, fractal space and its scales. Physics though I am afraid will be the last people to accept the new •5D³=10D paradigm as they ‘take too personal’ any attacks on their position of high popes of science. After all Mr. Bohm, for denying Mr. Bohr created the Universe was an outcast all his life. And no amount of truth and experimental facts seems able to change this view. LET US THEN TACKLE another key element of quantum physics explained with 5D logic… QUANTUM PHYSICS – ITS GENERATOR EQUATION In the graph a basic explanation of pilot-wave theory by PBS. Minds and languages of perception. Human ego-trips bias subjectively our view of the organic Universe. The zenith of german anthropomorphic, ‘chosen of god’ ego-trip of human cultures happened when Heisenberg, Bohr and Pauli denied the original De Broglie-Schrodinger’s interpretation of particles and electrons as ‘real entities’, (pilot-wave theory; density nebulae) for the astounding ego-trip that particles ONLY COLLAPSED/EXISTED when the perceiver observes them, and when NOT, they CO-EXIST in all POSSIBLE paths, GIVING RISE, to even more lunatic configurations of reality as the ‘many-worlds interpretation’, which have been all THE RAGE for a century, to allow physicists TO GO EVEN further than religious myth-makers in their imaginary Universal constructs. Actually as we shall go through a crash course on epistemology in a Universe of multiple scales, time arrows, camouflage, uncertain formation, etc, ALL perspectives do have a part of truth. Indeed, if we define the truth of the being as all the information about the being in itself (within the body-head ST>t ‘dual system’), and ALL the connections of the being as a knot of time-space cyclical actions with all other systems around it, all the information bout the being is not even within the being itself, but within the being, its ∆+1 world and the ∆-1 scale of its internal reactions. Epistemology then SEEKS AS MANY POSSIBLE INTERPRETATIONS, not only from the p.o.v. of the being but of all the entities which are tied by actions wit the being. In physics this means for example that when we apply vital mathematics to the study of ternary field-wave-particle systems, much more information becomes relevant and related to the being, which is encoded in all the different perspectives and intrpreatins of quantum physics from different points of view, the present wave (Schrodinger), the social ensemble (heisenberg), the ternary symmetry (de broglie), the scales of interaction (neutrino theory of light of de broglie too), etc. etc. The full ‘meaning’ of physics in that sense will never be revealed since physicists do not do the huge overhauling that represents to upgrade their reductionist concepts of ‘locotime’ (-; to the larger whole meaning of 1 time cycles, 3 time ages, 5 time actions, 7 time motions… It is by the way a fact that time is odd in all its manifestations, space is square, even. This lack of serious quantum epistemology was understood by the best of them who always denied Bohr, from Planck to Einstein to Bohm, did completely understand this.Now we the discovery of the EM engine, likely to be the same mechanism that ‘moves at quantum level’ gravitational, cosmic bodies, we do KNOW the deterministic, fractal non-local, 5D ‘choice’ interpretation of B2 (broglie->bohm) is the one real and the non-locality of the universe is indeed born as bohm wanted of the organic wholeness of it all. Now, we have to understand what is the interpretation of time ternary symmetric, space-time ‘ti≈es’, which ensure and anchor a being with the far stronger causality of 3 time arrows and 3 symmetric organic adjacent, fitting one with the other, and ‘approved’ by a vital, action oriented @mind, dedicated to them. Reality thus become far more deterministic and we shall go through it once and again. The Bohmian paradigm. The proper way to study quantum physics is therefore to consider from the perspective of the higher rules, the different theories of the field. The most complete is the Bohmian alternative, based in the Bell theorem, which states that a quantum system must be non-local ≈ simultaneous in the whole space-domain observed, or it must be able to transfer information to the past, 2 basic tenants of ternary logic based in the equation of time ages: Present (Hyperbolic body-wave) = Past (Limbic field) x Future (spheric partihead). Limbic fields receive information from their relative future partiheads 🙂 which appear to be guided by the entropic death to the past of the fields so the question is, who imprints the future, the path the answer is irrelevant, the chase not, and the chase is between the field and parti-head which chases it, and the future is the spherical being. How the future emits information to the past? It happens in the way it communicates through networks and scales. But once can consider this: there is a length of time that co-exists in simultaneity as there is a length of space, which does so, and hence in this past to future interval strong flows of ‘causality’ make more probable certain paths over others, which can be calculated, how deterministically the particle follow this paths in bohemian mechanics by non-locality or relative transfers of information from future to past, it is always certain. In the graph, the understanding of the interaction between light and its ∆-1 gravitational scale of faster than light, with less information particles, is a completely misinterpreted field due to the difficulties on reconciling the real scalar structure of both space-time scales with the continuous paradigm of a single lineal space-time. Light feeds on gravitational quanta, likely neutrinos (neutrino theory of light), the only known-known serious candidate to be the graviton (once the spin problem is solved)… and as they do so, they move ahead. One of the effects of this feeding/creative/reproductive process of light is the EM engine that is puzzling every physicist of the world as we speak. But the number of new perspectives on light space-time is multiple. I.e. above we see why we ‘see’ a 3rd dimensional space, with 3 perpendicular, lineal euclidean coordinates, as those are the ones of light, which in turn describe the survival actions of exchange of energy and information of its photon-wave T>S organic systems. Below, we take the wave of light as an example of the process of collapse>evolution of a system into tighter organic, denser configurations, as waves and particles are just two different ‘states-ages’ of time evolution of a physical system. And it is mimicked in all other systems that ‘evolve into tighter’ organisations (from hordes to nations, from herds to organisms, from bits to minds…) Another key element of GST applied to physics is its capacity to discern between different theories and interpretations. For example, we have for very long talked that the Broglie>Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics is the right one, as it is the only one that exhausts our knowledge by introducing a 3rd needed ‘equation’ to complete the fractal generator of quantum space-time systems, the so-called ‘guiding pilot equation’, non-local, faster than light, which moves the particles, synchronising its internal clocks as organic systems of head-bodies do (your heart clock is synchronised with your mind-eye clock to a second per thought/beat). I worked extensively back in the 90s on the Bohmian paradigm to show the ‘equality’ of quantum formalisms and thermodynamic formalisms, the 2 fundamental scales of space-time left to unify after I showed how to unify the gravitational and quantum scales with the Unification equation of forces and charges, written all over the place (he, he, i was so proud of it long ago that i littered my texts with the unification equation). So the 3rd line hopefully by the end of 2017 will include all that formalism which truly shows there is nothing different on quantum physics, but there are always similar equations in all scales, and what changes is the way we perceive a system, depending on detail and information. In the maximal detailed individual analysis systems are sums of ‘quantum actions’; in its first social layers, they become organised in herds and waves that synchronise its motions/clocks; and finally when we consider larger spans of time and space, the system becomes non-local, stochastic or statistic, as the ‘individual properties’ start to become ‘suppressed’ by the whole organism. So happens with the mathematics that change to more generic analysis, either statistical in space, or cyclical in time (fourier transforms that aggregate waves into a single larger, growing pattern). In that regard, a deep ontological-epistemological distinction is needed, and certainly the revision of Broglie-Bohm work will be unavoidable as the EM engine shows how indeed, motion is eternal and provided by the lower gravitational scale (pilot, non-local wave) which feeds the light scale as its |-spe entropic element. Solutions to Einstein’s field equations in time. In that regard Einstein’s special relativity is a refined analysis of v=s/t and time as a parameter of locomotion. But his true genius is found in general relativity, which offers us a continuous, undetailed description of the larger scales of space-time of the Universe, we humans perceive, very much in terms of 5D metric equations, even if this is not clear to present research, given the fact that physicists do not acknowledge the other time motions of organic nature. While quantum physics, makes a far more detailed description of the smallest scales, which carry according to 5d metric much more information, and for that reason appear as a ‘moving’ foam of informative fluctuations. I.e. in the above graph of world cycles of physical matter we see that we can order the 3 main solutions of EFE (Einstein’s field equations) into a simple world cycle that all physical systems follow: the big-bang, expansive, entropic solution, both at the beginning and end of the cycle (generation and extinction of mass), the steady state solution when mass reproduces into a relative ‘eternal present’ (preferred by Einstein) and the big crunch, or black hole’s schwarzschild /Kerr solutions, which represent the 3rd informative old age of any space-time physical system, from the simplest atoms (resumed in Einstein’s dual equation E-> mc2 and M=E/c2) to the star, galaxy and Universe: We have shown the fundamental new insight of breaking space into infinite quanta of energy dominant in entropic motions (proved also experimentally in the study of vacuum, made of quanta with motions); defining time in terms of cyclical clocks and world cycles and space-time as a series of fractal scales: The fact that many phenomena now must be re-interpreted, adsorbing it to one of the 7 motions in time and 3 ages of a world cycles; that most spatial forms now must be defined in terms of topological motions and organic functions; and that many phenomena is so similar that it requires a careful analysis of which scale it belongs to. SO WE HAVE NOT CORRECTED any equation of physics, but very fast made a huge re-interptetation of data that represents an entire upheaval of our view of the physical world just by establishing the moving, broken nature of space quanta, the cyclical, informative, causal nature of time motions and the fractal structure of the whole space-time system, which applied specifically to Physical equations about the ∆±4 relative scales of quantum and cosmology means: • TIME CHANGES: The 3 solutions to EFE taken before as ‘spatial’ and because of the single arrow of classic time physics, as entropic big-bang only are now 3 solutions in time that define the same world cycle of life and death that any system. So happens to particles and antiparticles, no longer 2 different states in space, but 2 different ages of the same being in time. • SPACE CHANGES: The concept of a fixed background space as the ultimate origin of it all is replaced by the concept of space as an entropic motion, which means the Universe is ultimately made of motions in space-time and will NEVER die. • SCALES ARE SIMILAR: Those ideas are reinforced by the fact that all physical scales are self-similar and so the concept that data always comes from a single space-time continuum disappears and the cosmic big-bang becomes reduced in scale (when we study in depth without a pre-conceived idea of a cosmic big bang that suits so well the ego-trips of physicists as the people who know it all, the data available, which we shall show fits better in a quasar big-bang). We have just here show 3 solutions to what physicists consider the 3 most important pending questions of their disciplines – the Unification equation of charges and masses, 2 different vortices of accelerated time (mathematically described in our post on cosmology) the particle/antiparticle duality and the ‘ages of physical space-time and its parallel scales in the fractal Universe’ according to EFE, just to give a brief glimpse to the potency of a new dimension of space-time to respond so many pending questions of all sciences – as all of them do happen in space-time – all systems occupy space and last in time and so we need a much wider understanding of those concepts both logically, philosophically and mathematically. In that regard, perhaps the greatest advance for future science of GST and the understanding of 5D metric is the advances on our formal languages of space (mathematics) and time (logic), which now must become more complex, as we need to complete the non-euclidean revolution of mathematics, started by Gauss , Lobachevsji and Riemann, which changed the 5th postulate of mathematics – definition of a point with volume, but DID NOT change the other 4 postulates, we shall modify to fully grasp the discontinuous scalar structure of space; and a change in Aristotelian Logic, based in a single arrow of time, as we have now at least 3 time arrows, that of energy, of information, and the scalar arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, to play with and build up those 7 motions of time, and infinite scales of fractal space that conform the structure of the Universe. Many other questions of mathematical physics will then be easily solved, from the different big-bang scales of reality to the reasons why there are 3 families of mass, why there are hierarchy problems between forces, etc. And what is more fascinating those will be simple intuitive solutions. Since as Leonardo put it ‘simplicity is the last sophistication’, because ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein)… Indeed, when Copernicus put in the center the sun, all orbital graphs simplified, when we fully understand the fractal structure of space and the cyclical nature of time, all the questions distorted by the simplex locomotion-entropy only time of physicists solve immediately, almost magically. Other matter is that such a group of ‘self-centred’ dogmatic thinkers as physicists mostly are accept it easily. But while we shall do huge inroads on the proper interpretation of the meaning of mathematical physics, the true discoveries of the fractal paradigm will happen on biological sciences, as we shall complete biology with the understanding of the topological arrows of evolution of all systems towards higher content of energy or information, the importance of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes through the development of social networks, and the explanation of the vital program of life, in which beings try to increase the energy and information of its systems to survive. And specially in social sciences, history described as the world cycle in time of the super organism of mankind, and any of its fractal parts, nations, religions and civilisations, described as the ∆+1 eusocial scale of individual humans, joined by energetic≈economic and informative≈legal≈political networks. Pilot wave theory After 70 years on the blue, the System Scientist Mr. Bohm, who among many other interdisciplinary efforts completed the rational ternary structure of quantum physics, has been vindicated since only his work can explain the EM engine. It has also been for 20 years the ‘canonical quantum physics’ of the 5th dimensional paradigm. “This idea (pilot-wave theory) seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored” J.S.Bell. THE PHYSICAL PLANE: QUANTA But of course BSB (Broglie->Schrodinger->Bohm) equations (mind the reader Bohr just ‘interpreted’ AGAINST the authors, its own equation and got ‘away with it’!!! as the genius, uauh, the son of a wealthy banker at the height of power, he did manage to make truth, wishful thinking as few of his generation), only IS THE EQUATION OF LOCO-MOTION, there should be therefore 6 MORE EQUATIONS TO COMPLETE THE ‘HIDDEN VARIABLES’ OF THE DESCRIPTION OF ALL THE MOTIONS OF THE WORLDCYCLE OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC PLANE. So for the most important motion, reproduction of a quantum ∆-3 light, photonic wave we have: Physics traditionally starts with the description of the lowest scales of the Universe, of which there are some theoretical ones, notably strings, dealing with the O-|, closed-open time-space duality in the form of a mathematical function that describes those closed and open, time and space strings as the first components of the Universe. Yet to fully go beyond the metaphysical plane of ‘space-time constructs’ with theoretical right laws but not experimental eidence we have to come to the first perceived scale, that of O-particles of time and |-entropic forces and ≈Wave states, the quanta of any generator equation of any system of the Universe. So quantum physics is the first STience of the first scale of reality. And of course, by the principle of correspondence GST must correspond with the laws of quantum physics. This is immediate but when we go into deeper details a first question arises, which of the 3 main interpretations of quantum physics corresponds with GST, Bohr’s interpretation, Bohm or Everett, that is, the probabilistic, deterministic or multiple worlds interpretation? The answer is that the 3 properly understood have some merits, and introduce some general laws of the Universe, but when we get serious in the details, there is no doubt that Bohm’s interpretation is the correct one, because it introduces the ‘3rd equation’ of the ternary fractal generator of quantum systems, which the other descriptions like. So we should rather reformulate our assertion: ‘Bohm’s formalism is the complete quantum theory as it provides the ternary equations of the ‘entropic field’ (pilot wave), the informative particles (position equation) and the present space-time body wave of the system (Schrodinger’s equation), to fully describe the Generator equation of quantum physical systems and make a complete description of it: Γ: Spe (Pilot wave: Bohm’s equation) < ST: Schrondinger’s equation: Body-wave > Tiƒ: Particle’s position. So the study of that Generator equation is the essence of quantum physics. It is then NOT surprising on that view that the quantum pilot wave theory was enormously opposed by the idealist Heisenberg-Bohr, ego-centered ‘paradox’ with its quintessential anthropomorphism, who said: ‘we humans ‘act and influence and define the particle’ which does not exist but only appear when we see it. ‘The moon does not exist only when i look at it’ quipped back Einstein And De broglie, the theoretical aristocrat, a loner, with little interest for weapons, machines and pen pals, explained indeed why the moon does exist (all particles float and travel above the field configuration). But what is really the ‘pilot-wave’ with its non-local, faster than c speed? According to 5D metric, it is an ∆-1 scale below, since, Sp x V(t)=∆: Max. V(t) x Min. Sp= ∆-1. So the fast wave is the gravitational scale below that of quantum electromagnetism, which we do ‘NOT’ SEE, because we do not see gravitation, but particles MUST perceive and feed on, being obviously ‘guided’ or ‘rather chasing’ the pilot wave of gravitational quanta that feeds it≈creates the particle: ‘Magic’: motion is absolute, eternal and the nature of reality. And it goes faster in lower ∆-1 scales. So the gravitational, non local scale below the c-speed scale does move light, or rather feeds it, as we have been explaining for decades. We now have a proof. Will this impose de B2 model of quantum physics and the 5D unification of sciences? I doubt it. In any case we shall explore all those aspects of quantum theory and relativity, along the development of the proper formalism of both sciences. It is though quite evident that our ‘scale’ is just a russian doll within the larger dark world scale of the 5th dimension which runs faster than c-speed and we are connected below and above in maximal and minimal size scales through the ‘simultaneous, non-local symmetries’ between particles-waves-fields, the 3 ternary components of physical systems: In the graph, the 4 fundamental scales of the physical Universe. The 4th of ‘dark energy/matter’, goes faster than light V>c between galaxies, it is the gravitational scale, which feeds quantum particles and moves cosmic bodies, which constantly synchronise its clocks with the wave, and drags it, slowing it down as it transfers motion to them. Let us then summarise our study of THE generator scale in the ‘limiting’ scales shown in the right side of the graph, the quantum atomic world shown in the previous equation, which we will fill up throughout the 2017-18 period dedicated to this complex line of the model. Widening the properties of physical systems to organicism. OUR METHOD OF TRUTH, AS WE HAVE EXPLAINED MANY TIMES IS SIMPLE. The Universe and all its parts are a fractal of ‘dust of space-time’, which reproduces information and self-organises fractal points (dust of space-time) through three networks, whose function are the three ‘arrows of time’ (entropic motion, reproductive energy and temporal information) into ‘super organisms’, structured across three scales of space-time, which exist as they ‘travel through those three scales’ tracing world cycles of existence between generation and death. And so as all has four components, ∆-scales of space and time, described by a ‘language of perception’, ∆, S≈T and º-languages are the ‘minimum’ elements to describe any system. So we shall consider for the main scales of physical systems, its ternary space-time super organisms and world cycles, with special emphasis on the human languages and physical Tiƒ-minds/systems of processing information that command them. Those are the ultimate principles which all realities show, ∆±i, s≈t and ∆º. And the more important is the Tiƒ singularity/mirrors that order the system with information. And as classic physics misses mostly its understanding of information at multiple levels (as an arrow of time, as the substance of languages), the purpose of this post is mainly to define that set of informative principles, languages and minds, which Steane asks for physical systems, as we have done for all other sciences, since when we add the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, we wide our understanding of all physical systems and scales with it. To that aim we have first defined in the first line ðime&information on one side, and §pace& entropy on the other, as the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which merge into present ‘momentum’, and integrate along a ‘world cycle’ of a physical system or super organism, into ga conservative closed zero-sum or energy path. As those are the three arrows of time that structure physical systems, as they do with all forms of ∆ûst of space-time. In that regard we will, as we did in other posts, study astrophysics, with: • The experimental, scientific method, providing proofs of the cyclical, fractal ðime-§pace structure of all Universal beings. • The correspondence principle, translating basic theories of classic PHYSICS to ‘stience’. So we shall describe the topological (S), organic (∆), vital (T) and sentient (º) properties of physical beings, derived of its ∆ºST common nature. And provide at experimental level: • Its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties derived of its ternary topological=spatial elements and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles. • Its biological properties, derived of the 5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure of all systems. • Its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of exi=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals. Indeed, the only difference between physical systems and other systems are the ‘relative distance’ to the human anthropomorphic mind, which only accepts ‘full properties’ of beings in scales closer to them: physical systems are those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the ‘life’ properties of: Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 which WE DEFINE through its five ‘drives=actions of existence’, we shall show all physical systems also obey – for example, they are defined by quantum numbers for the electron… And of course, the sentient and Mental, linguistic properties, we only give to: Humans systems, which are in our scale, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 level. Needless to say the ‘hidden symmetries and correspondences’ of the parts of the Universe, as seen by human beings are many. For example, humans ‘like’ to apply only spatial=mathematical properties to physical systems, vital, temporal ages only to biological systems, social and mental qualities only to human beings, yet we shall show the ∆ºst quality of all beings to be the same, regardless on how huminds, which want to come on top as the self-centred only intelligent, social loving species describe them. The study of quantum with the proper Bohm’s model. Consider the case of the Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics, which ads a split of the present wave-function (Schrodinger’s) in 2 equations, a Hamiltonian of the kinetic energy of the particles and its quantum potential field: Particle x quantum potential: Spe (field) < ST-schrodinger’s wave. The mind of the particle change states from stop, perceive information of the pilot wave (particle-quantum potential), to accelerated/decelerated motions (particle absorbs wave), to present iterative motions (schrodinger’s wave). We have made explicit our choice of the Bohm model as the only one that corresponds with 5D, and now it is proved by the EM engine. So we shall escape completely except in a critical sense other false interpretations (everett many-worlds and Bohr’s anthropomorphic one). How we connect the field of quantum physics with that of the ternary equation? quite simple. As we have shown, the 3 elements needed for a ternary equation happen in the bohm model as he adds the ‘missing’ element in bohr’s model, the quantum equation of the potential field or ‘quantum field’, which departing from the ∆-1 scale of gravitation becomes the source of guiding information, moving faster than light, which takes the particle ahead. The explanation of all the spooky effects involved is however immediate in ¬Æ physics. The pilot wave is NOT really a wave – it is a scattering, entropic potential field of attraction that moves/feeds the particle, at faster than light speeds. Non-local gravitation≈tachyon≈≈dark energy components should then be considered the ‘strings’ that pull the particle along a certain path. Specifically as we are in the 3rd line and have no qualms to use full-power standard science, we depart from… The Schrödinger equation:is re-written using the polar form for the wave function, which means in terms of any GST equation that we are changing from ‘wave state’ to ‘particle+field state’, from ST-Present to a Past-Future Configuration; and accordingly magically as we change from the Ø-hyperbolic topology of the schrodinger’s present wave into a split past-future, |-0 configuration, we obtain 2 inverse ± solutions, one to define the scattering, entropic field, with a configuration equation, and the other that shows the particle, ‘polar’ element: So first we obtain a polar version: ψ= R exp iS/ ℏ with real-valued functions R is the amplitude (absolute value) of the wave function ψ and S/ℏ its phase. It must be notice that the factor mass will NO LONGER be on the particle but on the guiding equation, as it is the attractive power of the system, and certainly the gravitational scale from where ‘mass-feeding’ happens for the particle. This yields our two canonical GST equations: from the imaginary and real part of the Schrödinger equation follow the continuity equation and the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation, respectively. Continuity equation The imaginary part of the Schrödinger equation in polar form yields:which, provided ρ=R^{2}, can be interpreted as the continuity equation ∂ρ/∂t+∇. (ρv)= 0 for the probability density ρ. Quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation The real part of the Schrödinger equation in polar form yields a modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation also referred to as quantum Hamilton–Jacobi equation.[5] It differs from the classical Hamilton–Jacobi equation only by the term: This term Q, called quantum potential, thus depends on the curvature of the amplitude of the wave function. Here the key element is /2m, which is in fact the expression of kinetic energy T=p²/2m, for a quantum system, in which the parameter of momentum changes into action. (nt. A fundamental sub-field of GST is to fully account for the CHANGES in parameters of energy and information, as perceived by human systems of measure; so momentum is NOT the same function for a quantum system than a thermodynamic system, and a gravitational system or ∆>+2, the scale where momentum fully applies without need to translate). We can then consider the 2 terms of the quantum potential: the gradient of the amplitude which IS THE ∆+1 perspective and rato of integrative time change and the constant, h2/2m, which is the key element that puts in interaction the ‘mass field’ of the ∆-1 scale of gravitation and the ‘substance’ of which the particle is made, actions of light≈electromagnetic energy and time (themselves in physics two symmetric forms of seeing motion as ‘linea-extended’ or ‘imploded in internal time cycles’: ENERGY IS THE UNCOILING OF THE STORED CYCLICAL MOTIONS OF MEMORIAL TIME CYCLES INTERNAL TO THE ORGANISM. This truism little understood by physicists is however key to understand the universe. Again you must see reality as what truly is: a topological game of ternary species in motion assembled and dismembered, wholes that become parts, lines that become cycles that stop in minds as distances and forms… the ultimate logical, visual, vital principles. NEXT IT is easy to understand then he cyclical motion as a memorial motion, a mass, an attractive potential which uncoils in a blast outwards of entropic scattering, from particle to field t particle. In the limit →0, the function S is a solution of the (classical) Hamilton-Jacobi equation; therefore, the function S is also called the Hamilton-Jacobi function or action extended to quantum physics. And so alas! so nicely put together the Bohm model give us the 3+Å equations of the generator, the Spe-guiding wave, the ST-present wave the Tiƒ particle configuration and the Hamiltonian of its actions in space-time. And by doing so also eliminates all spooky effects and nonsense idealism of XX c. physicists playing to do philosophy of science. THERE IS NOTHING different in the quantum scale. A few ‘not-so-obvious’ correspondences between the previous equations and GST: • The imaginary part of any function, being basically a phase/angle term, is the term of the Tiƒ particle-information network of the physical system we study. This which goes a long way explaining the meaning of imaginary numbers, always related to the time-information related factor of the system, is confirmed by the nature of the continuity equation, related to the position of the particle and its density≈probability of ’emergence’ (as particles are ultimately social evolutions of ∆-1 quanta into the light ∆-quanta. • Inversely the real part, which gives us the amplitude of the wave, corresponds to the spatial part, or space-component of the physical system, and so it is connected to the ∆-1 field configuration of faster than light ‘gravitons’. The correct models of quantum physics. How the introduction of GST to this basic concept of physics can solve questions pending on the discipline can be shown with an example: the Bohm’s model of quantum physics. A paradigm’s change: Bohm’s realist interpretation of quantum physics. “This idea (pilot-wave theory) seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored” J.S.Bell. The equations of quantum physics work, and must be interpreted. the interpretation accepted, copenhagen is anthropomorphic, subjective, and so we prefer the objective B2 MODEL (Broglie->Bohm), whose rejection at Solvay was a matter of power in physics – a dilettante french aristocrat and then a communist ex-patriot searched by the FBI, versus the full power of the German-Jewish industrial elite of the Heisenberg-Bohr idealist school (in the graph). It was nasty, carried by second lackeys of Bohr notably Pauli, a cut-throat infamous bestard who would say ‘it is not even wrong’ to despise a rival theory. The french aristocrat of course was from a more polite environment. With Bohm it was worst, one of those elite members of science who DO HAVE ALSO ETHICS, like Einstein, of whom he was the favourite student and collaborator, both communists, lost his American passport, and gave us also the full completion of the Broglie theory of particle-wave duality, to which he added the potential quantum field of ∆-4 ‘neutrino background space-time to complete the meaning of the Schrodinger’s equation essentially an Ælgebraic equation of ‘Existential Algebra’ that reads causally as ‘time dependent’: Present wave = Past-quantum potential + Future -Particle state: In the graph, Schrodinger’s equation, which in polar-particle state shows even a simpler description of the 3 parts of the quantum world IS THE GENERATOR equation of the ∆-3 plane – A KNOWN SCALE, unlike the Neutrino/string/dark world ∆-4 scale. We do know of course that as ∆-i always ‘codes’ ∆-i+1 scales (where i is the scalar index, which amazingly enough 🙂 -not so we chose it for a reason, is closely related to information, its negantropic effect on ‘positive energy’ and the imaginary root of -1:) the light field must be born of a neutrino field-wave. And so it is also DE BROGLIE’S THEORY OF NEUTRINO-LIGHT, the other ‘missing’ fundamental piece of the structure of quantum physics whose TRUE PIONEERS ARE: Planck->Einstein->De Broglie->Schrodinger->Bohm THIS IS THE CANON, and the key for GST to accept the canon is the simple transformation of the wave, hyperbolic formalism into the polar formalism of a particle, with the addition of the Cartesian formalism of the field. As frames of reference define the function and form of the being, such as the ‘simplest expression of an equation in a frame’ shows its true nature. i.e. A circle is simpler in its polar equation, just a number for the radius than in a cartesian ‘hyperbolic plane’. Of course, once we know, we can put more elements of GST to the cocktail and explain the magnificent findings of Broglie->Bohm: So this is what we shall explain in the first line, details and lesser themes to the backsides, bullshit of copenhagen and old and modern, everett, deutsch ‘many worlds’ theories, reduced to what really is – an ill understood analysis of the ‘fractal structure discotnuous space-time, where each parallel universe is really a parallel world, a fractal island-universe of this plane of existence. So once the everett formulae is solved as an expression of the fractal paradigm, and the copenhagen reduced to power struggle and german-jewish idealistic schools of myths of god chosen who ‘create’ reality. We can get serious and study the real themes, which is: Planck’s equations-> Einstein’s -> de broglie’s-> schrodinger->Feynman quantum paths->Bohm’s wholeness and quantum potential field… of neutrinos, which give birth to light (de broglies’) as a good introduction to further expansions by GST. Given the enormous development of electronic machines, the quantum scale – despite being the remotest from the creative human o-mind, scale, ∆o – is the most studied. This has always implied difficulties as the uncertainty of experimental evidence set by the simple formula: Max. Uncertainty ≈ Max. ∆ index = (max. Distance from ∆o human observer) Implies quantum physics to be the most uncertain in measures. And yet the one our industrial civilisations wants to know more about. Beyond the error of focusing human evolution not on the human ∆@mind scale, making medicine and ∆+1 history the main stiences of the species, the obvious error is one between truth and measure, reality and linguistic interpretation. Further on, in a complex 10 dimensional Universe, where each ∆ST• being is connected through 3 organic topologies, 3 ages and 3 ∆±1 scales with reality, all of them self-centred in the @mind, we come to the obvious fact that there is at least 10 different perspectives on the nature of an ∆ST• being depending on which point of view we take to ‘bias’ reality. Hence the enormous number of interpretations and misinterpretations of quantum physics. Which ones are to be considered right? All of them, will give us a certain information as fractal epistemology declares absolute truth=information to belong to the being itself, the probability of truth increases with more perspectives: max. TRUTH =1 = BEING = ALL perspectives on the being. Indeed, in the connected Universe the being alone is NOT the whole being, but all its entanglements and perspectives, internal and external make the being, which is ultimately a knot of time-space cyclical actions, ‘real’. All this said it is also obvious that the interpretations of quantum mechanics that we must accept are those which are ‘realist’, correspond with the ‘laws of 5D physics’ and with the experimental method both in its causal laws and experimental facts. So there are some misinterpretations easy to straighten up – the many worlds interpretation, which must indeed understand the difference between fractal worlds happening in the same Universe, and the difference between potential, temporal existence as variations of the program and real happenings, when the event ‘is’. Some anthropomorphic biased points of view (the Copenhagen interpretation), and then some ‘forgotten’, realist clearly superior interpretations, as the ‘basis’ of it all, to which we can add on then, perspectives on the other interpretations. So we do have a fav, Broglie’s -> Bohm work, which completes with the pilot quantum potential and particle’s position the 3 fundamental equations of quantum physics , with ad ons from other interpretations, such as the potential fractal world’s that happen in other places (Everett’s), the collapse of a herd of fractal ‘electrons’ when the observer ‘bombs’ it – a vital behaviour proper of schools and herds, or the Penrose interpretation, which considers the wave physical and its limit, the ‘planck mass’ or minimal ‘graviton’ (in the sense of minimal mass to connect with the ∆+1 gravitational comus coward), the ‘limit’ in which quantum effects are observable… It remains of course so much work to be done, which a single researcher cannot and others will as the millennia advances and the new paradigm becomes overwhelmingly obvious. The ‘weirdness’ of the fractal Universe, applied to the ‘weirdness’ of quantum physics. On the positive side the weirdness of quantum physics has parallels clear in the weirdness of 5D ∆ST• beings, which make quantum physics and relativity so fascinating for the understanding of the fractal Universe, and the errors of quantum and relativity interpretations so obviously caused by the simplex 4D Space-time continuum of present philosophy of science. A few elements which are shown in modern physics of the small and the huge ∆±3,4 scales (quanta, relativity), that coincide and are explained by 5D ST• Beings. • Quantum physics requires either non-locality or travel of information to the past, two fundamental features of ¬Æ: past(entropy) x future (information) = Present (energy), implies non-locality for entropy and travel to the past for information. Both collapse into the present to create the ‘actual’ reality from the potentials stored in the past and the logic decisions obtained in the future. • Quantum physics occurs in a configuration space, or Hillbert space and have multiple generalised coordinates, showing that each particle is the central point of view of an æ-cartesian mind, enacting its @tions of exi=stence. • Quantum physics shows the superposition of the ternary elements of the being – its quantum potential field, its schrodinger wave, and its particle positions, at the same time, as the system is a ternary system. • Quantum probability in its Bohr’s interpretation is a time interpretation (on probabilities not populations), because the speed of time of quantum systems according to 5D metric, Max. V(Tiƒ) ≈ Max. -i (∆-index). That is, smaller systems have longer time cycles and when a slow system as a human being is, observes a quantum faster system, it can only observe it IN TIME-long spans, SO IT APPLIES, time-related concepts, such as probability, AND THIS IS THE ORIGIN OF QUANTUM WEIRDNESS in the copenhagen interpretations. • Schrödinger picture vs. Heisenberg picture The ambiguity of perception, space-time is further re-stated by the symmetry between both pictures: • One can take the observables to be dependent on time, while the state σ was fixed once at the beginning of the experiment. This approach is called the Heisenberg picture. One can, equivalently, treat the observables as fixed, while the state of the system depends on time; that is known as the Schrödinger picture. Conceptually (and mathematically), the two approaches are equivalent; choosing one of them is a matter of convention.Both viewpoints are used in quantum theory. While non-relativistic quantum mechanics is usually formulated in terms of the Schrödinger picture, the Heisenberg picture is often preferred in a relativistic context, that is, for quantum field theory. • It is then a fundamental task of correction and harmonisation of quantum physics and any ∆±>|2| STience for that matter, to make explicit which phenomena are better described in space (Max. Spe x Min. Tiƒ, or entropic < motions) and which one in time (>, Max. T). There is of course, remaining there the observations to which we must NOW AD INTERPRETATIONS OF GST, ORGANIC, TOPOLOGICAL AND OF COMPLEX TIME CAUSALITY. So the collapse of the wave comes directly of two facts: • Particles guide ‘ahead’ any system of waves of present as the relative future position of the whole. So THEY COLLIDE FIRST. • systems have defensive particle-tight configuration when its pilot guide wave sends him ‘contraction’ information of a larger momentum coming into its territorial region. So observers DO influence and bring about the collapse of the wave. The philosophy of ‘stience’ of Haley and Bohm. FINALLY, before we enter into the upgrading of Bohmian theory not so much in maths but in interpretation and its PLUG-IN on STience (the Unification theory of all of them and its GST)., we shall consider some rightful conclusions of Haley and Bohm regarding his formalism: Hiley emphasised several aspects that regard the quantum potential of a quantum particle: • It is derived mathematically from the real part of the Schrödinger equation under polar decomposition of the wave function, is not derived from a Hamiltonian or other external source, and could be said to be involved in a self-organising process involving a basic underlying field. • it does not change if R is multiplied by a constant, as this term is also present in the denominator, so that Q is independent of the magnitude of ψ and thus of field intensity; therefore, the quantum potential fulfils a precondition for nonlocality: it need not fall off as distance increases. • it carries information about the whole experimental arrangement in which the particle finds itself. And so we are going to study them extensively and enlighten them further with the help of 5D metric. Polar vs. Cartesian≈hyperbolic Compositions. In the posts on the Language of God, i-logic Mathematics, (final section of the web), we have stressed enormously the GREATEST ADVANCE OF I-LOGIC VITAL TOPOLOGY: MATHEMATICS ARE LIVING PROCESSES, WHOSE CAUSAL MOMENTS IN THE STILL MIND OF MAN DERIVE INTO QUANTUM JUMPS IN THE CAUSAL-TIME PROCESS OF REALITY. And so mathematics are REAL, when understood properly with the added postulates of i-logic. This understood, when Bohm had the idea of using instead of the cartesian=present=wave=hyperbolic=Ø-configuration the polar coordinates, he was performing in his thought experiment a vital jump in the i-logic world of topological beings. And it means therefore that the ‘being’ splits and mutates from its Ø-present state as a a Schrodinger wave into a past x future,|x O, ∆-1 potential field x ∆+1 Particle ‘above’ being. So what B2 found was the complete BEAT of the 2 S≈T <≈> S x T, WAVE, particle-field, female-male eternal ‘fundamental symmetry’ of a space-time being. Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information. What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process). Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞): In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information. Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems. Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature. Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines. The question of light motion as a wave and the particle state as an informative collapsed point in stillness brings though as always in stience when solving a paradox – in this case the paradox of motion -new questions. If motion is reproduction of information along a path of entropy, which is ‘warped into form’ emerging in a series of scales of ∆-wholeness, so when you move your hand, you are actually recreating all your scales above invisible gravitation – creating a wave of electronic light that travels very slow as it reproduces your system, the first question is: how many scales are in the Universe for motion to happen at all? The scales cannot be infinite or reproduction of information will be eternal. But the question is misleading, since a wave does not really move but transmits a series of vibrations to particles that are already there, in a dense ‘medium’. This brings the question of ‘ether’, of ‘substance or form in space’ over ‘motion in time’. As many other open questions which we shall treat in other posts on depth, we just enunciate them in this introduction. Enough to say that science is not written into stone but an evolving concern, so relativity is not a dogma, but an interpretation, which was good enough in its moment and we shall expand further. In practical terms the key way to understand GST (ab. for the generator of space-time, or general systems theory) is to equip your mind with multidimensional thought. The solution adopted by Einstein and Bohr was pure idealism of the Hilbert school – there is no substance, no reference, all is virtual language, mathematical thought. But physical systems as all systems are dominant in present states, signified in physics by waves. Waves carry both entropic motion and cyclical form and as such are the natural present, reproductive, e > iƒ element of reality, whereas we use e and i for entropy & energy (max. e x min. i) information (max. f x min. e). Systems that take and give entropy and form, become then energy systems able to communicate and start the building of larger scales of the fifth dimension. The dominance of present thus stays within the game and provokes the constant reproduction of motion along scales. A simple example will suffice. In GST the duality wave-particle, equivalent to the duality body-head of biological systems is self-explanatory. As all systems have a reproductive body, guided by an informative head, which moves thanks to lineal energetic limbs, all physical systems have a particle-form, often found, as in light waves on top of the wave-body, or higher point to focus information over the lineal field that provides its energy of motion. Yet, this explanation is organic, regardless of its quantitative measure regarding the value of the energy, the speed of reproduction of information of the wave and the position of the particle. Physicists however to my surprise during my period of conferences were not interested, on this why to the 100 years conundrum of the Principle of Complementarity of physics. For them, it was simply outside the realm of their research as organic, biological properties of Nature, are not mathematical, as they use to explain such bio-logical, logical, in-form-ative characteristics the logic-verbal language of man. Still, to make more amenable to physicists those posts on physical systems we will use extensively topological varieties to define such organic ternary structures. Since in a Universe of a single space-time sheet of 4 dimensions there are only 3 possible topologies, the lineal field/hyperbolic wave/spherical particle system we just explained can be considered a full topological system that combines the 3 topological varieties of the Universe into an organic form: Spe (Lineal -field/limbs) < St-hyperbolic wave-body > tiƒ (informative, cyclical particle/head). In the graph, the 3 components of a physical, quantum system, the particle, the wave and the lineal field over which it moves. Lacking a real understanding of the 5D structure of the Universe, physicists can only describe the mathematical how of the process with the quantum wave equation of the graph and its visual depiction as we observe simultaneously the particle-head guiding, ‘piloting’, (right picture) the reproductive wave-body that moves, extracting energy-motion from the lineal field, which is expelled on the back of the wave. All this is described mathematically but we do interpret it also organically. As physical systems do have as all other systems both, topological and organic properties, following in its form the 3 canonical topologies of the mathematical language, and co-existing in 3 relative scales of reality as ∆-1 fields, ∆-waves and ∆+1 particles. To start with the proper interpretation of any system requires the ternary principle which only the pilot-wave theory includes with its three fundamental elements on the mathematical formulae, the particle state (left side schrodinger equation) better express in the polar formulation of bohm, the wave energy state, right side, and the field, entropy state the guiding equation: Once we have the three elements of its generator equation, we can study as Bohm does all the elements of the ‘electron’ and its ‘best’ generator equation available to quantum physics, and in doing so learn also the elements of GST applied to quantum theory. GENERATION IN TIME. An important form of explaining any stience is by making a ‘history’ of the real science, and whenever a branch has made a mistake and created a wrong distorted view, follow the rightful branch and go ‘into pure theoretical true space-time of linguistic nature, evolving the history of the science thereafter. We shall try to do the same here and so we can consider those sub-posts. Let us then do so for the science of quanta to trans-form it into the stience of quanta (Gst). Synchronicity of the three ‘time-clocks’ of the three parts of a supœrganism. And the first characteristic we observe is the synchornicity of the clocks of the field, wave and particle, which indicates they do form an œ. The problem here is that the stience of quanta is mathematically correct but interpreted wrongly as we have explained in previous posts. So the correct interpretation is Planck->Einstein->Broglie->Scrodinger->Bohm->Sancho, NOT, Planck->Bohr.. etc. Solvay, 27 Let us then pick up at that point, and follow the ‘less travelled road’ of Broglie. On the next screenshot from an excellent book on the matter: Broglie, a French aristocrat intuitively like Einstein follows the right path in correspondence with 5D metric and ST symmetries and laws. Indeed, Broglie realises mass is the frequency of a closed cycle=clock of time. So any mass or wave that closes a cyclical period becomes a particle (definition of particle as a time clock of physical scales). This astounding hindsight gives us a first simple beautiful equation, the clock of a particle is proportional to its mass, ƒo=mo, multiplied by a constant ratio between the ‘space constants of the ∆+1 gravitational scale (bidimensional light: c2) and the ∆-1 light scale (bidimensional h-action). We first get a huge insight on the fact that the true constant is c2, a bidimensional, opening, field of light space, entropic expansion of pure light space, that is… And so we have a clock of time, which defines a particle, proportional to its mass, multiplied by the ratio between the spatial constants of its ∆±1 scales. He had defined the minimal bit of informative light space-time minds, its logic clock, and now he was going to define the wave-field over which it ‘glides’, the phase wave or quantum potential of the lower ‘graviton’ world (which he then will explain in another ‘silly-nilly rejected’ fascinating insight on the nature of light, in his ‘neutrino theory of light’… Genius till the end. But let us not advance further. What he found at this stage was a quantum potential, which should be in fact a neutrino potential or sea of faster than light tachyon, smaller neutrinos? whose physical consistence is independent of our incapacity to observe it. How this ‘lower russian doll’ is connected to the larger astronomical scale of newtonian gravitation is also a debatable question. Do all systems who are closed feel a ‘gravitational potential regardless of scale’ on virtue of a general, universal resonance among all closed time cycles, regardless of scale? In any case his photons with minimal mass, hence connection to that larger gravitational, ‘galactic vortex’ where mass do have its full range of newtonian power, do have an internal ‘mass clock’ (might have other clocks of other scales of its complex inner system), which can ‘fine-tune’ with a ‘field wave’ or ‘quantum potential’, faster than light, non-local, which provides it ‘energy’ to move as an EM engine would do ahead, guided by the faster wave, with which it has synchronised its Tiƒ PROVOKING A RESONANCE phenomena, which is the a priori (3rd equality postulate) condition for an action of space-time to take place. ONCE thus both, the particle and the field are in resonance (synchronous time periods), the particle eextracts motion stored as energy from the gravitational field, moving ahead in the direction of the pilot field (the word wave is contradictory, here, it is in fact an entropy, scattering ∆-1 field of max. motion). So this is the correct interpretation. When a 2 slit experiment is performed, creating a ‘huge’ colliding barrier for the electrons, some of them ‘splash’ dying entropically 2 scales down into the gravitational guiding pilot wave, which guides the remaining particles through its entropic scattering ‘bohemian paths’ The results being the same, the B2 (broglie-bohm) realistic theory, is thus the forgotten true departure for sound interpretations of quantum physics. Time related problems in quantum physics interpretations. In the image we can see how the Bohmian paths converge in the middle region where the density of probabilities are maximised. It is just discussing about the angels on a pin to consider different interpretations by ‘errors’ of measure due to the uncertainty caused by the ‘far away region of time speeds and space sizes’ to which the subject belong. So far we know that h is the quanta of space measured in ‘actions’ , ƒ, the quanta of time, and Energy, its product. So the first question we must ask is how an ∆o human observer trying to ‘guess’ the forms of an ∆-3 world observes that world. The most evident changes are those in the parameters of space that mutate between: h(action; ∆-1 space)->k (entropy; ∆ space) ->m ∆+1 space (mass) or c (speed) (∆+2 space?) while at the same time the clocks of time change from: ƒ∆-1 quanta clock -> Temperature ∆-thermodynamic time-> v-speed time (∆+1)-> mass (∆+2 gravitational clock) Now, because the speed at which ∆-3 quantum phenomena is much larger than ours, one of the key errors of quantum physics is not to realise they are studying dynamic long stretches of time, including full world cycles of extinction and existence of particles, from where they get ”spatial images’, which they try to interpret with human clock speeds, unaware of the temporal, long period nature of the observance. This is the origin of some serious errors of interpretation. Indeed all the argument between Schrodinger-like descriptions of a density, or Heisenberg on probability is merely which ‘position’ we adopt that which have measure time and that which we have measure space. It is however more of an interpretation. Resonance however in a ternary system is only at a time in one of the 3 domains of existence. Do they act on the same moment, in time across scales and regions of the organism, i don’t believe so. The action of planck; the entropy of a gas; the attractive mass, AS THIS CANNOT be deduced from classic quantum physics we simply apply the rules of 5D ternary systems. In general space-like are wave-like, present-like, dynamic but seemingly eternal, not changing, sometimes this not changing confused with spatial organic, ‘population’ nature; but when the mutation is larger, the change more obvious or faster, they appear as time-like objects from the ‘slow camera view of the ∆o human observer’. The interaction,$Field, ≈Wave, ðParticle

A collection of particles has an associated matter wave, which evolves according to the Schrödinger equation. Each particle follows a deterministic trajectory, which is guided by the wave function; collectively, the density of the particles conforms to the magnitude of the wave function.

The wave function is not influenced by the particle and can exist also as an empty wave function.

The third element, the quantum fiel brings to light nonlocality compatible with faster-than-light communication of information. As the field of entropy does NOT transport information, only motion, in an scattering, ‘disorganising’ way, and so a Q(v)>C is empirically compatible with relativity.

The pilot is the particle’s clock above; the energy is the wave, which traces the path with form, the entropy, the quantum non-local field, of phase velocity, Vph = c²/v, in phase with the pilot clock, νo (frequency of the mass, vo=mo (c²/h). So Broglie plugs in the definition of mass of GST by considering that the mass-particle has a frequency vo, proportional to its mass, and inverse to the T, proper time clock that diminishes, as we must adscribe it to the clock of the thermodynamic scale closer to the concept of temperature that the clock of the gravitational scale, which is given by Vo, the mass clock.

So we can see in the equation how the frequency of the mass increases as the thermodynamic temperature clocks tend to zero (V1=vo√1-v²/c²)

This in turn brings in a stroke of genius, taken from the same schrodinger equation but formulated in polar coordinates, the quantum field and the particle in different sides:

So they co-exist as the two topological, particle-wave elements over the velocity non-local field of the ∆-1 scale.

Here again we see how the pilot-wave theory follows with the ‘real’ parameters and ‘ratios’ of GST. We are using  the continuity equation for the probability density, ρ, which is the ratio of density of information that matters to define the quantum potential speed and capacity to transmit motion to the particle-wave system. The beauty and simplicity of the action, – ∂s/∂t, which appears as a sum of the field, wave and particle contributions, under the common synchronicity off its clocks, ν,νo,ν1… mirrors perfectly the symmetries of the GST formalism.

The homologies of the Γ ∆-2 generator of electronic systems IN different mathematical deductions, notably the hydrodynamic homology by Madelung, use also the ‘complete’ Hamilton-Jacobi and continuity equations to obtain the three elements in hyperbolic and polar perspectives.

All this confirms the duality of dimensions of time for those equations, as the schrodinger time-independent present function transforms in 2 functions, which can be seen also as the generator processes from fields into particles, through the probability function, which is symmetric in space to the population≈density function, as ALL PROBABILITIES reproduced in time, become then population densities in space.

The kinetic energy thus is absorbed from the potential, which ALSO HAS capacity to carry information albeit of a simplified form compared to that of the next scales, or at least from our ∆o perspective that has more uncertainty of the quantum potential.

Ultimately the fusion of this quantum potential with the concepts of the ∆-4 gravitational≈dark matter scale will put together relativity and quantum PROPERLy. and reduce the nonsense of multiple jargons for what is truly always the same dark matter, denser, and faster russian doll larger scale that engulfs us all.

The value of the other 2 models

It is indeed a self-organising process of change between the 2 fundamental sub-species of reality. How many then of those states do really exist? The answer of i-logic vital geometry is that all are in fact possible.

This means a few things about the partial validity of copenhagen and multiple-world interpretations: they do have some truth when properly interpreted. For example the many universes is  A MANY WORLDS CORRECT interpretation, not parallel Universes but fractal self-similar patterns (in the wave state, hence no longer particles but fractal parts, histories in fractal planets, fractal cells, fractal stars self-similar to all others of the galaxy, playing similar ‘stories’).

On the other hand in copenhagen, the collapse of a wave into a particle DO happen when an observer as a school in front of a huge shark or an army in front of a battle come together into a whole to avoid the entropic energy of the human observer.

Non-Locality.

Another fundamental property of 5D structures essential to B2 models is the non-locality needed for any super organism to interact. Thus indeed, in the name of ‘Russian worlds’ of reality in which beings with higher volume of information≈energy≈time≈motion, but less ‘extension-space’, than the system that encases them, which IS WHAT ALL IS ABOUT, non-locality means simultaneity between all the points of the body that move together in synchrony as your whole body moves in simultaneity. The external membrane of a system and all its layers downwards do have therefore in larger wholes of lesser information a larger speed or relative non-locality.

So happens to the gravitational scale of tachyon guiding quantum field ‘scattering’. You can indeed see in certain way those slits as killing fields, when the particle indeed does not continue but dissolves (Bohr’s case) but also in the inverse way as feeding fields for the particle that moves thanks to its entropy. This is therefore another important element, which explains the duality of the PARTICLE-FIELD RELATIONSHIP.

The information carried by fields and particles

HOW THIS communication of information between particles takes place? This is boom’s assistant 3rd conclusion: waves represent a flow of information transmitted – not of energy (a concept itself quite complex for physics has conceptually need understood it – close to time-motion in a subtle way).

Information indeed can move instantly because it can move to the past. And so IT HAS INFINITE SPEED, NON-LOCALITY, INFORMATION IS THE MAGIC PART OF IT.

Potentials and densities.

A potential function is a field equation that provides an entropic ∆-1 arrow for an ∆-system’, with the simplest topology≈minimal information max. extension of a system.  As such we can consider that potential fields generate waves and particles, but also consider them synchronically in their interactions once created them. In this case we are studying – unlike in Feynman generative equations the synchronic interaction between the 3 ‘topological states’.

Quantum potential, thus depends on the curvature of the amplitude of the wave function, as it is ultimately the curvature≈speed of time of each of its wave/particle clocks and its synchronies what makes the complex ‘organic system’ of quantum physics so ‘normal’… within…

The organic perception of the previous equations.

We have explained what should have been clear 100 years ago to physicists if they didn’t want to ‘go where they had never go’, into meta-physical musings. What comes next is not obvious at all, as it is the contribution of 5D to the organic explanation of bohm. The particle IS feeding:

Light is  the main force of human ‘Light-Space-time. Thus we confuse its T ages and the actions light performs in time, as they become our Space fixed-dimensions… (Sp, Tƒ Galilean paradox of light)

1st isomorphism: Generator Equation.

Light is an organic system with a simultaneous reproductive body and a cyclical informative photon (wave-particle duality) that feed on lineal energy (tachyon strings≈gravitons≈expansive dark energy all similar concepts.)

Let us then consider now the ∆-1 field equation of that generator, namely the flow of gravitational ≥c scattering entropic expansive on the ‘loose’, flying wave of micro-gravitons which the electron particle ‘chases’ (-;

The generator of Gravitational forces:

Quantum potential and relativity
Bohm and Hiley demonstrated that the non-locality of quantum theory can be understood as limit case of a purely local theory, provided the transmission of active information is allowed to be greater than the speed of light, and that this limit case yields approximations to both quantum theory and relativity.

The quantum potential approach was extended by Hiley and co-workers to quantum field theory in Minkowski space-time and to curved spacetime.

The fractal generator of gravitational systems in classic physics, are Einstein’s EFE equations, which however must be understood in terms of ‘ages of the cosmos’. So it does not apply to this 1..quanta scale. Here we are ‘stuck’ with the non-local field (configuration equation) of Bohm’s model. IT IS IN FACT, THE CONNECTING equation with the quantum graviton world, which complemented with the neutrino light, also proposed by Louis De Broglie, the great forgotten pioneer genius, with the highest intuitions on the field, albeit like this other Luis (me), completely uninterested in mechanisms, power, engineering, a latin aristocratic fella, with little connection to power-science reason why AGAIN, his work on the neutrino theory of light, the one we also choose as the most logic theory of gravitons, IS forgotten.

As an invisible form, gravitation is NOT clearly understood, despite inroads of Einstein, and the OBVIOUS FACT that neutrinos ARE gravitons and DO feed to ‘create’ the light beam. We deal with this part of quantum theory elsewhere.

So we can consider in the gravitational scale that its Tƒ element, are mass vortices, its Sp state, which ultimately compose that mass factor in all particles are gravitons≈neutrinos, which likely ‘break’ in galactic light space to c-speed.

And finally there is the non-local wave state, which is easily deducible in several forms. The simplest one.

Since time is related to information, and we do not see gravitation information, then Tiƒ=0.

So, since Sp x Tƒ=K (5D metric), or in Galileo’s terminology, WITH THE INVERSE OF CYCLICAL TIME, lineal time T=1/Tƒ->  V(K)=S/T. So as T=0 (its information), V(k)=X/0=∞

Non-Locality in 5D. Bohmian active information as a series of quanta to the past, that create a line of present.

It is the way you can have non-locality rationally beyond the ‘tricks’ of quantum/relativist die-hard defenders of the c-totem limit of speed of the infinite.

What happens for a system to be a relative simultaneous, instantaneous, non local, the transfer though is NOT of energy , forwards, but a lateral, ‘front-wave’ like, topological version of a faster speed. We could state that each relative cycle travels to the ‘past’ in its entropic direction, and as such it is a relative present quanta of micro-time, which moved to the past one after another means that this past speed equals the present speed of the cycle.. So for the simplest possible trajectory, a lineal trajectory:

Speed of simultaneous system-> Jump to the past ≈ time required to travel back in time for a full present. And so if a system can move at -c speed motion back in time as a sum of a series of cyclical returns

Sp=distance must THEN be infinite in speed infinite. This is called non-locality. And it is A FUNDAMENTAL FEATURE BOTH OF BOHM’S MODEL AND 5D AS IT IMPLIES THE EXISTENCE OF A SUPERORGANISM, WHICH BY DEFINITION IS A REGION OF SPACE-TIME SYNCHRONOUS IN ITS TIME FREQUENCIES (so indeed in de Broglie’s first formulation the particle has an inner clock synchronous with that of the configuration field and wave) and adjacent in its space location, hence non-local as all the parts of the system must be communicated in a quanta of time.

We deal with those themes in more depth in the post on synchronicity. Just to state that the main Space-Energy duality of gravitation is its invisibility as it exists beyond the ∆-3 scale of human light/electronic perception, so we see it as ‘space’ not as energy, even if it is the ∆-4 force that moves us.

LET US then go back to the classic ‘standard mathematical jargon’ to explore further the correspondence of 5D and B2 quantum physics.

Bell’s Theorem – non local hidden variables.

All those ‘novelties’ of the 5D universe come together to a series of facts: ∆-1 gravitational fields are non-local≈ faster than light. Information can travel backwards in the arrow of ‘future to past’, through the scalar ∆-dimension.

And both facts together allow the simultaneity of a given membrane, which breaks the domain of a system in an GST form and an outer Universe.

Finally the Universe is far more deterministic, in fact absolutely deterministic when we consider certain parameters and long range events: the larger the scale of our analysis the more deterministic the whole shall become – till finally the absolute whole, the game of existence is absolute deterministic – as the web of connections enlarge in its details and fix each one in certain events, patterns and actions, or else extinction ends its freedom=chaos=death.

This tendency of the Universe towards absolute determinism, is the most brutally opposed consequence of non-local entanglement and Bell’s theorem, but human anthropomorphic entitled ego-trips of uniqueness makes it impossible to accept by humans, with huge consequences to our survival, as we love to practice freedom=chaos=death. So what is becoming deterministic in man is that his chaotic freedom will soon bring its planetary extinction. And that is the bio-logical counterpart of the mathematical determinism found by Bell.

Putting together those elements, it means that the Universe is non-local for each super organism, which can act simultaneously in its motions, and it has hidden variables, regarding its ∆-1 field where non-locality takes place.

And that is in brief, the philosophy behind Bell’s theorem, which fully validates B2->5D quantum physics:

Where we also give up locality, explaining the violation of Bell’s inequality by means of a non-local hidden variable theory, (∆-1 faster than light gravitational fields of accelerated ‘dark energy’ a) through which the particles exchange information about their states at faster than light speeds, through a linguistic process of translation that allows that faster speed, as people can accelerate its voice speech with a ‘tele’phone translating device, and brains inversely slow down information through a chemical, slow down translating language. Thus one of the key space-time events of scalar 5D, the communication of basic information through a faster ∆-1 medium through linguistic translations is the explanation of non-locality, spooky effects, entanglement etc.

It is also the basis of the Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics, which requires that all particles in the universe be able to instantaneously exchange information with all others, through the pilot v>c guiding wave, which is the quantum potential of the ∆-1 gravitational=dark energy=neutrino field (Broglie’s theory of neutrino light, which in bio-logical terms make a neutrino≈graviton≈dark energy particle the food and cellular constituent of a light photon).

Quantum potential of an n-particle system
The Schrödinger wave function of a many-particle quantum system cannot be represented in ordinary three-dimensional space. Rather, it is represented in configuration space, with three dimensions per particle. A single point in configuration space thus represents the configuration of the entire n-particle system as a whole.

Here thus we have another full plug-in of quantum physics in the Bohm model with 5D: each particle is a subjective diffeomorphic ‘mind-point of view’, with 3 different dimensions.

What kind of relationship in ‘vital topology’ have both ‘scales’. A classic one of ‘Herd’, as each individual part of the particle feeds in a seemingly unlimiting ‘potential field’. So function potentials are separated, added in herd form.

That the wave function is separable means that ψ factorizes in the form ψ(r1, r2, t)=ψA (r1, t) ψB (r2, t)
Then it follows that also R factorizes, and the system’s total quantum potential becomes the sum of the quantum potentials of the two particles.

For the evolution of the wave function, Bohmian mechanics is formulated in terms of Schrödinger’s equation alone. Nonetheless the textbook collapse rule is a consequence of the Bohmian dynamics. To appreciate this one should first note that, since observation implies interaction, a system under observation cannot be a closed system but rather must be a subsystem of a larger closed system, which we may take to be the entire universe, or any smaller more or less closed system that contains the system to be observed, the subsystem. The configuration

Qof this larger system naturally splits into

X, the configuration of the subsystem, and

Y, the configuration of the environment of the subsystem.

Suppose the larger system has wave function

Ψ=Ψ(q)=Ψ(x,y)

According to Bohmian mechanics, the larger system is then completely described by

Ψ, evolving according to Schrödinger’s equation, together with

X and Y. The question then arises—and it is a critical question—as to what should be meant by the wave function of the subsystem.

There is a rather obvious answer for this, a natural function of

X that suitably incorporates the objective structure at hand, namely the conditional wave function

ψ(x)=Ψ(x,Y)

obtained by plugging the actual configuration of the environment into the wave function of the larger system. (This definition is appropriate only for scalar wave functions; for particles with spin the situation would be a little more complicated.) It then follows immediately that the configuration of the subsystem obeys the guiding equation with the conditional wave function on its right-hand side.

Moreover, taking into account the way that the conditional wave function depends upon time t

ψt (x)= Ψt(x,Yt)

In trying to understand the status in Bohmian mechanics of the quantum equilibrium distribution, it is perhaps helpful to think of

quantum equilibrium, ϱ=|ψ|2

as HOMO-logous to (classical) thermodynamic equilibrium, ϱ=exp(−H/kT)/Z

the probability distribution of the phase-space point of a system in equilibrium at temperature T
T. Z is a normalization constant called the partition function and k is Boltzmann’s constant.)

This ISOMORPHISM OF SCALE has several facets:

In both cases the probability distributions are naturally associated with their respective dynamical systems. In particular, these distributions are stationary or, what amounts to the same thing within the framework of Bohmian mechanics, equivariant.

In both cases it seems natural to try to justify these equilibrium distributions by means of mixing-type, convergence-to-equilibrium arguments.

It has been argued, however, that in both cases the ultimate justification for these probability distributions must be in terms of statistical patterns that ensembles of actual subsystems within a typical individual universe exhibit.

In both cases the status of, and justification for, equilibrium distributions is still controversial. It is also perhaps worth noting that the typicality-grounded account of quantum randomness in Bohmian mechanics is extremely similar to Everett’s account of quantum randomness for “many worlds”, despite the huge metaphysical differences that exist between these two versions of quantum theory.

It can be shown that probabilities for positions given by the quantum equilibrium distribution emerge naturally from an analysis of “equilibrium” for the deterministic dynamical system that Bohmian mechanics defines, much as the Maxwellian velocity distribution emerges from an analysis of classical thermodynamic equilibrium.

Thus with Bohmian mechanics the statistical description in quantum theory indeed takes, as Einstein anticipated, “an approximately HOMO-logous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics.

The ∆-2 scale is for the human monad, ∆º the relative pixel or bit of information, which it finds limited by the c-speed of reproduction of information, accessible to the electronic mind system, we humans use (C-H-O-N orbitals) to create our mind structures of minimal perception of light space-time, the euclidean cartesian ternary perpendicular geometry in which most of our mind perception of reality is based – light space.

WE do NOT perceive gluon-gravitational-strong forces but only electro-weak forces, electromagnetic explosive, life-oriented spatially expansive forces and implosive weak, decay forces at best.

As such the mind of light space-time starts when our electrons digital or flesh, of measure instruments, eyes, stop into information and distance c speed light space-time.

Basic Quantum weirdness explained with ∆st.

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

One of the triumphs of quantum physics is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: Heisenberg theorized that you can’t simultaneously measure a particle’s position and momentum exactly. This is one of the central theories that has destroyed classical physics. But nothing has come in its place nor an illogic explanation has been provided – how could be otherwise if there is not even a proper definition of particles and waves, position and momentum, energy and mass; as we provide in this blog?

Let us briefly then comment on it: The formal inequality relates the standard deviation of position σx and the standard deviation of momentum
σp. In T.Œ though those 2 parameters are related to the singularity which is the ‘fixed point’ of any system, its @-still mind, or reference in space.

So POSITION is a measure of the ‘STRENGTH’ of a singularity point in any ∆st system of reality. This means that in the galaxy POSITION measures the strength of the central black hole that anchors with its gravitational well the body of stars; in an atom, it is given by the mass of the nuclei, in a charge by the well of its electromagnetic singularity; in a human being by the relative stillness of the mind-space mapping, and so on. What is then for a particle-point, which can be defined by its spin, h/2 and momentum, this position element? Obviously the h-angular momentum of the spin.

On the other hand, the 2 other terms of the Heisenberg uncertainty ARE lineal p and ANGULAR, h/2 momentum, which are related by the linear momentum operator, which in quantum mechanics is: P|Ψ>=-ih∇|Ψ>. Chinese for the non-initiated (: but don’t worry. We will ‘talk chinese’ only in the sub posts. What matters here is that angular and lineal momentum are easily transformed into each other, as in classic physics.

Let us then consider to start with… in very simple terms… classic physics and that transformation.

The 3 elements of T.œ in quantum physics.

In quantum physics we are using the position basis, the momentum basis, or the energy basis, because they represent the singularity=position, the membrane (momentum) or its conversion through an SHF, simple harmonic function into a lineal wave of motion and the energy or vital space, between them, which are the 3 elements of any system of reality (T.œ).

In that sense the Linear momentum (P) operator looks like this in quantum mechanics: – i ∇|ψ> which essentially means it is the first derivative, or a ‘peeled’ quanta of the angular momentum, h, of the system, passed into lineal form, as it is rotated through the complex plane.

What this simple means is that there is a natural correspondence between:

• 1D: Position and singularity or active magnitude ‘scalar’, valuation; which is the ultimate meaning of a point-0-particle which becomes the o-1 dimension as a ‘dirac function of value 1.
• 2D: The membrane or constrain, which becomes the angular momentum of the system, transformed into lineal momentum-motion as the angular momentum develops a wave of communication through a sinusoidal/fourier function of  (boson) transmission of energy and information. In the graph we can see how a basic ‘step symmetry’ that transforms an §ð dimension and an st-dimension (envelop of the wave), makes essentially easy to transform the angular into lineal momentum, both becoming the key parameter of the membrane.
• 3D: Which ad in several ways, mostly through superposition, 1+2 = 3D, into a wave function (Scrondinger’s energy equation) that fills up the vital space (Hillbert space that includes all the possible configurations of the wave and its enclosed particles). Here again we might use a Hamiltonian (T+V)… as the best operator to define such energy waves.

It is then when the specific eigenvalues and forms that the ternary system can form are expressed as position=singularity momentum= and energy values to characterise the system (constant).

Yet the minimum measure we must obtain will be a ‘planckton’, an h-planck of vital energy, appropriately defined as the uncertain piece we ABSORB TO OBSERVE, so the 3 dimensions can only be related by an equation of uncertainty, h= momentum x position, one of the many expressions of ∑∏= s x t 5D metric, in this case: minimal quanta of energy of a quantum system, h/2 equal to position-singularity x momentum.

Those simple elements appear always in mathematical equations, which are for that reason so often ternary games of the s ‘operator’ ð = ∑∏.

For example, in its most general expression angular momentum expresses the value and relationship of the membrane with its singularity through a common space with a self-centred radius= m (membrane singularity) x r (radius of the vital space) o (singularity center).

Quantum physics is then expressed in a complex Hilbert space just because such space is complex enough to accommodate all the various possible states of an ∆-3 minimal scale of reality, where by sxt=k 5D metric will have maximal number of forms-populations and time-speeds.

To which we might also ad ‘perturbations’ of other systems and scales, which makes it all more complex – and even more so because of the pedantic probability choice of formalism that further complicates the business, as all operators systems and ensembles have to be normalised to get the value 1 (of  those processes the Delta function is the only worth to mention at this stage, as we have shown to rightly give us the value of dimension 1 for the zero particle). It also means that the particle state is the @-informative still 0-state… beyond which the wave-motion takes over.

So we could consider the principle as a normal transformative equation: x(position) x p (lineal momentum) = h (angular momentum).

And as classic angular momentum IS a measure that includes the 3 elements of the being, its active magnitude, cyclical motion and radius between the membrane and the singularity through the vital energy (mrv); we consider the Heisenberg uncertainty NOT as physicists do, a probabilistic relationship, obtained through the messy processes of ‘transformation of quantum mechanics into a probabilistic language’ (which includes many artificial manipulations, such as the normalisation of real measures to fit it into the 0-1 probabilistic sphere, etc.) but RATHER an expression of the absolute MINIMAL ‘substance-element’, ST.œ of the quantum reality, the h/2 planck ‘angular momentum’ or spin.

This is then reinforced by the unique feature of h/2: it is the only parameter/operator that cannot be differentiated, hence it cannot have smaller values/quanta of space-time, which makes up the spin; it is ultimately the only intrinsic quality perceived in the minimal scale of reality, perceived by the informative electronic human mind. So it is ultimately the minimal unit or ‘pixel’ used by the humind or any other electronic mind to ‘measure reality’ and extract energy and information from it.

It follows then a few deductions of a world, of ¥e-ntities whose ultimate space-time quanta or T.œ is a 1/2 h spin of ‘angular momentum’ intrinsic to the being:

• From this principle, now definition of the minimal piece of reality, virtual particles pop up in the vacuum space.
• Further on, as it is the minimal quanta the ‘electron’ eats up when measuring a system, it is the uncertain piece, ‘missed’ in our attempts to measure – similar to the ±1 ‘missed’ number, when we compare a continuous differentiable curve such as π or √2 and its discontinuous spatial geometric curve.

So the PROPER way to study quantum physics should be to start defining the T.Œ 3 ELEMENTS of a quantum system, and departing from its minimal quanta, h/2 as its key constant build up as we (will) do in our posts on astrophysics, a realist view of the ∆-3 scale.

So in this blog, in the sub posts on quantum systems we will not to start with ‘abstract’ interpretations of quantum physics mostly due to the german idealist school of Heisenberg (the author of that uncertainty) and Bohr, but with the organic laws of the Universe, and describe what we find in the ∆-3,4 scales from the perspective of ∆ST• beings.

There is though as my mind evolved from an earlier dismissal of all idealist interpretations, through a closely analysis of its meaning NOT a thorough dismissal of the findings of Bohr’s school but rather the understanding of them, with 3 ‘ad ons’, DEDUCED FROM THE 3 LEGS OF THE new’ Stientific enlarged method=EDC: Experimental Method+Disomorphic Method+Classic knowledge theories in Correspondence with those Disomorphic laws:

-The one: Experimental facts: WE DEPART from experimental facts of reality; space-time events and super organisms, which we shall analyse with Classic theories and new Disomorphic insights that enhance the depth of our understanding:

-The many: Correspondence Principle of Classic science: We then analyse under the ‘Rashomon effect’ proper of all mind spaces, and its kaleidoscopic inflationary languages,  the many theories and models huminds cast upon the experimental facts. In the mathematical case its spatial=geometric, social=numeric, Scalar=analytic and Symmetric=algebraci mirrors, which make multiple interpretations or partial truths of the event that reveal some ‘angle’ of truth on the single fact.

-The whole: Disomorphic method. And then we enlighten both, explaining the genesis of the event and its kaleidoscopic mind mirrors of truth, as a by-product of the isomorphic qualities of space-time  and its co-existing organic planes, species of super organisms and worldcycles. How much detail we establish in that final analysis depends on our focus and detail. So we start with the study of its DUALITIES in space-time (Steps of time=motion; symmetries on space, analysis and algebra in the mathematical mirror); continue with the study of its ternary symmetries using the Generator equation (S<St>T; ∆±1 planes; | xO = Ø topologies). And we might consider finally deeper analysis of the Rashomon effect (the 4+@ mind views on the event – ∆-planes, s, t, s=t and @-linguistic view).

A more thorough, realist investigation of any super organism and its world cycle, though will simply not deal with C and express in pure 5D terms the nature of the event, by studying the super organism and its 5² Dimensions of space-time ordered in space, as 3 x 3 +0 physiological networks and in time as a world cycle, sum of a series of ‘infinitesimal, vital 5 actions of space-time (Motion, information, energy feeding, reproduction and social evolution) that ensure its survival. And in scales as a series of co-existing, ∆±1 Planes which shynchronize its actions and clocks in symbiotic manner. And then if we want to focus in a certain element we apply the ternary fractal method, as each super organism is made of smaller super organisms, which can also be broken into ternary networks and parts, each one able to be studied in increasing focus with its 5D dimensions and ternary symmetries.

Obviously the blog focuses in this 3rd element trying to enlighten the enormous wealth of experimental data of science, languages and culture seen with the new eyes of E+ C+D.

Let us then see what the Heisenberg principle experimentally suggests to us with a few more Ðisomorphic views:

@-mind. As quantum physics has been casted dogmatically in terms of probabilities, the Heisenberg principle can be obtained merely without much ado, from the uncertainty of measure according to a classic theorem of probability, called the Schwarz inequality which writes: ∆A∆B≥ 1/2 |<[A,B] and applied to the measure of quantum systems ‘reads’ like this: the product of two uncertainties is greater than or equal to 1/2 the absolute value of the commutator of their respective operators.

In quantum mechanics, the momentum operator is: P = ih

And the operator for the momentum in the x direction is: Px=-ih ∂/∂x

So the commutator of the X operator (which just returns the x position of a particle) and Px [X, Px] = iℏ, is – applying the Schwarz inequality which writes: ∆A∆B≥ 1/2 |<[A,B] ; since Δx and Δpx are the uncertainties in x and Δpx:

∆x∆px≥h/2

That is the Heisenberg uncertainty relation, derived from abstract mathematical probability, which merely proves, using a few basic assumptions, on the nature of  a particle momentum, that we can’t measure the physical world with perfect accuracy.

And so again we have now the focus on the momentum operator, as here both elements are basically derived from it.

If we add that to define a particle we just need its spin, h/2 and momentum, p; (and for more complex analysis its energy hamiltonian) it is obvious that quantum particles ARE t.œs with the 3 elements of all t.œs): energy-Hamiltonians/wave states; particles with its lineal and angular momentum/position. Indeed, angular momentum can now be considered in relationship with the position of the particle, as a cyclical motion intrinsic to the system.

S=Teps: particle-wave complementarity.

A more realist view that all this ‘operator talk’ of the mathematical mind is to consider the steps of motion of particles-waves.

It is truth that on the ‘limit’ of a perfect singularity=position measure, the wave is totally uncertain, and vice versa.

A perfect wave is NOT localised. Those limits thus suggest that unlike more evolved systems like a human being, where the body-wave and the particle-head ARE always ensemble and in a connected synchronous simultaneous stable distance/clock time between them (the second of thought, heart beat and limb-steps), in quantum physics we do HAVE as in blood red cells with no nuclei and maximal wave-motion through the network vs. pure nuclei with no motion, in the neuronal cell-network, WAVES with no particle-head and HEADS-singularities-positions with no waves.

The uncertainty would then mean that a perfect quantum wave has NO position-particle-singularity and a perfect particle-position has NO wave-motion. This is then directly connected with the duality of wave-motion vs. particle-information of the quantum system, WHICH CONSTANTLY COLLAPSES INTO PARTICLE to inform itself and then moves as a ternary wave with no particle-location… We are so to speak witnessing the ‘birth’ of the two first Dimensions of space-the 2D  wave and cyclical time-the 1D particle… and they are NOT in photons and moving electrons yet ensembled.

Then we realise that in the atom, the next stage of evolution, they ARE ensembled already as the uncertainty is never infinite, because the wave is ‘constrained’ by the atomic central singularity. So uncertainty diminish as the particle-form starts to take over, and the wave keeps diminishing till in our level, there is hardly wave state (speed is reduced then, as information/perception takes over).

Now as h is everywhere in the world of quantum physics, it is obvious that the ‘probabilistic’, ‘uncertain’, ‘measure’ view of that inequality is NOT the most proper to make a serious, realist analysis of the ginormous numbers of equations where h/2 appears. And so we shall call h/2 a PLANCKTON, not an uncertainty, whereas from the pov of a still-mind point particle (hence without relative v-speed and no lineal momentum) IS all what a point particle is.

Quantum Tunneling

How can particles go where, classically, they don’t have enough energy to go? For example, how can an electron with energy E go into an electrostatic field where you need to have more than energy E to penetrate?

The answer is obvious with ∆st quantum tunnelling: the particle doesn’t cross -it crosses as a moving wave, and as it has then no head it can cross.

In quantum physics, you can superimpose states on each other, and have particles tunnel into areas that would be classically impossible, because unlike big particles, this initial scale of creation still can go back and forth an annihilate the particle state.

So the Rashomon accepts multiple view of quantum physics, but tries to convert them to realism, starting with the most well known duality between…

Religious beliefs vs. realist stience: BOHR VS. BOHM

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982)

We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego. The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.

Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is.

It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it. Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so, humans will. Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm. But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state. So ∆ST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations. The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: ‘scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so. I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long. All this said, the importance of quantum physics beyond its praxis becomes greatly reduced once we accept Einstein’s dictum that its statistical formula is equivalent to the statistical view of thermodynamics, and as such, it must be by all means merely one of the four canonical different ∆•ST perspectives we cast upon any system to have the full kaleidoscopic vision of it – that of the ∆º bigger human observer, which is NOT however in ‘Ontological terms’ the most important, which will be the realist interpretation. In epistemological terms, as the truth of the system is only contained in the system itself, we humans can extract enough information from the system considering its main perspectives, which will be both related to the ∆•st components of the being and the point of view of the observer that brings the perspective and a certain bias on it. If we can then perform (not always possible) a more objective, realist perspective with minimal interference into the observer, it should be the preferred analysis, even though all do have some degree of truth, which will be maximal knowing them all: Max. truth about X = All possible linguistic and spatial ∆•st perspectives/theories on it < 1 (the truth of the system in itself). Yet while all the perspectives have some truth on it, the more objective pov, in this case BB-theory will be the one with higher probability of truth. The concept then of a probable truth mimics the ‘normalisation’ processes of quantum physics in which the total probability or total wave density of the being gives us the ‘complete description’ of it, with value 1. Value 1 though in GST, with its 10 relative dimensions and multiple pov, CANNOT be achieved only studying the ‘wave function/state’ and the observer as copenhagen does. In that regard the most important advance need in quantum mechanics is NOT experimental analysis but the proper formal theoretical analysis and understanding on the relationship between mathematical structures and the ∆•st reality and how one encases the other with its formal concepts. Most of the bullshit of quantum physics comes from the null understanding humans have of the experimental nature of mathematics and how its concepts and operandi and structures deform and translate that reality. Specifically in quantum physics IS essential to fully grasp the meaning of imaginary numbers and its relationship with the three arrows of time. Only when humans figure out properly the relationship between GST and ‘experimental mathematics’, they will be able to understand the Universe. This a priori connection however requires what humans have more difficulty to achieve – an analysis of its inner self, mind, ego and the endophysics brought about by them. In that regard, given my limited time, growing age depression and indifference to communicate, which obviously ended also the interest of Broglie and Bohm in his own theory I won’t complete these posts as intended, pouring all my work advancing BB-quantum analysis as we tried to do with big-bang theory in a more professional way for many reasons. Essentially what matters to us within the larger whole blog is to understand that quantum physics is NOT made of special ‘particles’; that humans perceive it as similar to thermodynamic ensembles because we are looking downwards in 5D to scales with faster time cycles, larger speeds, smaller sizes and growing populations, susceptible to be mathematically defined by the symmetry between ‘population densities in space and population events in time’ (a key S♥ð studied elsewhere in the mathematical section), which must be understood in depth in order to see in realistic terms the probability functions of quantum physics – an artefact of mathematical measure, which cannot be interpreted esoterically but as a mirror approximation. So the differences between statistical mechanics and statistical quantum physics obeys two non-internal causes, related to: • human limits of observation (so we do not perceive the quantum potential directly; we confuse often space phenomena with time phenomena, confusing densities of populations with probabilities). • Intrinsic differences between scales, as a fractal changes slightly the forms between scales, so as cells do have the same living function that multicellular organisms but are NOT exactly the same, particle physics and molecular physics are NOT exactly the same but their differences are so small that in fact we can do two descriptions which are even closer (statistical) than the ones we do of cells and living organisms. • So really all what physicists should do is changing their fundamentalist chip about the importance of their analysis of those scales, learn 5D, non-Æ, ternary time arrows and do the job I thought to do in those texts but my exhaustion won’t let me do. And fuking change their book texts, and explain the real story of Bohm vs. Bohr, dismiss Bohr, put Bohm on Universities and complete his work long overdue. The hidden variable issue. All this said, as Humans are what the Universe has made them, self-centred ego minds only interested on themselves, the entire field is poisoned by the observer’s paradoxes. The question here is, non-locality (all other questions have been fairly resolved unless you are a fundamentalist believer in favour of Copenhagen) and the possible contradictions with the limit of c-speed that works on our scale of galactic light space-time (∆±3 light super organisms). If quantum potentials are ∆-4 scales associated to the dark and gravitational world, can we use its faster than c speed to carry messages? The answer IS NOT, because we CANNOT access beyond ∆-3 from the human pov. And that’s about it. Can then Galaxies, black holes and quantum particles do? YES! Because they are either so small they see the dark world merely as their next scaling and ‘feel’ its forces and informative flows, or in the case of the galaxy, because larger super organisms are based in information coded by smaller systems. So as the whale its smaller krills, the black hole o the galaxy plugs in directly on the ∆-4 scale of the quantum potential. Does it matter to understand quantum realism? NO, because from ‘fields’ we obtain ‘only motion’, even if it is for those ∆-3 particles guided motion, which is NOT really information (that is given by the wave-particle system), but ‘directionality’, the absolute minimal information – basically of distance≈speed. Now, again this is the GST explanation, but Bohm’s physics has their own ‘semiclassical one’, which is quite interesting and involves the homologous concept of quantum equilibrium similar to thermodynamic equilibrium. In that regard, the Universe is ‘simple and not malicious’ and understanding it as it is with all its symmetries isomorphisms≈homologies and connections IS enticing enough NOT to need weirdo egotist theories of reality. And this is really how we should call those two analysis: The ‘egotist interpretation’ of Mr. Bohr vs. the ‘realist interpretation’, point. NOW all this said when we simply abandon all this STUPID conversation of philosophy about observers, which the ‘well-schooled’ brain rightly rejects and simply get rid of the ‘scholastic physics’ and its arguments on angels on a pin, we can use BOTH FORMALISMS, and accept them as what they ARE TRULY, THE DIFFERENT perspectives, ∆ºst, on the same ‘ternary scalar beings’, all those formalisms are good enough to do praxis with particles as they merely reflect slightly kaleidoscopic ∆•st visions of it. • Copenhagen is merely a reductionist •ST vision, which highlights the MOST important point of view of time space systems, the present, st, wave-body configuration, adding the human • view of the observer’s mind. • Broglie>Bohm improve by showing both, the ST-ate (wave equation) and the S<>T (particle-field) state, which completes the dynamic existence of all systems (not only quantum particles). • We then have the ‘static, spatial’, analysis of Heisenberg (Matrix), the ∆ð-Feynman’s view from fields that make emerge waves and particles and many other secondary views and analysis we won’t deal with. In Bohmian mechanics the wave function, obeying Schrödinger’s equation, does not provide a complete description or representation of a quantum system. Rather, it governs the motion of the fundamental variables, the positions of the particles: In the Bohmian mechanical version of nonrelativistic quantum theory, quantum mechanics is fundamentally about the behavior of particles; the particles are described by their positions, and Bohmian mechanics prescribes how these change with time. In this sense, for Bohmian mechanics the particles are primary, or primitive, while the wave function is secondary, or derivative. For Copenhagen the body-wave matters more. Who is right? Again, both. There are people who use the body to serve the brain and people who focus the brain into the body. As a human example, women have more neurons connected to the body hypothalamus than the eye-external space. So the equivalent in humans of those two states are ‘wave-women’ vs. S<>T men (field-particles). In women the reproduction of the organism which the body performs becomes its biological task; while men are the entropic element that is ‘guided’ by the feeding energy of the ‘field’ of hunting. And we can take the argument further. Thus the prey guide the hunter particle that feeds on it? Does the ‘particle-head’ control the body and maintains its ‘static state’ above it? We are doing precisely comparisons with the isomorphic behaviour and ‘sub-species’ of mankind to show how all the varieties of phenomena respond to the same laws of GST. Not only particles-waves are similar to heat waves and statistical mechanics, BUT even humans do have the two Bohm vs. Bohr variations of female-male states. But if we were to have a choice, the proper order of sequential nature is for all similar isomorphisms: Field/Prey/Limbs guide the head/particle that feeds/moves through it, and the wave-body follows both. And the 3 co-exist together. But of course, you can argue very smart particles/heads guide the preys (as paleolithic hunters did with cattle); and very stupid particles/heads follow the ‘bodice’ (: And even in a more dynamic realist way,that the three guide each other at each moment of existence according to the 5 actions the system displays. So things do become more complex and all equations that are realist mirrors of phenomena matter. What is superfluous unneeded and out of place is the philosophical bull$hit.

So depending on which ceteris paribus or complete analysis we make, disregarding scholastic angels in a pin, each of those ∆•ST is worth in itself. All together give us the maximal ‘humind’ probability of truth, which only reaches 1 in the complete being and all its entanglements.

We shall therefore introduce some themes randomly as my mind has a hard time ordering this ‘encyclopaedia’, but meaningful, trying to deal with key issue as usual with the minimal amount of formal mathematics (as indeed, the true job here IS to understand the meaning of mathematical laws as realist expressions of the ultimate laws of FRACTAL SPACE-TIME.

RECAP 4 are the Rashomon differences of quantum systems over thermodynamic ensembles:

ð- fast time proper of small faster 5D metric and multiple space beings seen together as multiple paths, brings the probability=time view, as quantum beings complete their existence in the time of human perception and become extinct.

@: gauging information means the sentient particles react before measure.

∆±i scales: we see reality in the o-1 finitesimal probabilistic sphere, regardless of the fact it is equivalent to the 1-∞ spatial world.

S-Reproductive fast waves of motion in the quantum scale, and stop and go, wave-particle states become difficult to differentiate so a minimal h-quanta of discrete uncertainty is needed, and eigen values, which means much more information required to make sense of it and make good predictions.

We have two states to start with space-form and motion-time. Space is the mind-intelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.

The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, O-S.

The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.

The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare.So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality wave-particle, still ill understood in quantum physics.

We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.

The physical world is dual  from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean->Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n-1 quanta and U+1 worlds).

So what IS the proper way to make sense of the Galilean paradox? All this is good for measure and praxis of machine making etc. but conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.

∆º LANGUAGE: IDEALIST ERRORS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.

How it is possible that someone, Mr Bohr, who had not discovered a single of those equations, would bring about a ridiculous theory of interpretation of them AGAINST the realist sound explanations of their discoverers, einstein, broglie, schrodinger (and latter bohm) that for sheer power of the right wing german-jewish capitalist culture of the age, would ridicule and destitute of value the real theory, should NOT BE SURPRISING, since when we study social sciences we will NOTICE AGAIN, an astounding backwardness of biblical interpretations of $elected go(l)d cultures and creationist economists, even in biology creationism of anthropomorphic ego-trip nature dominated most of it, and today only is slowly coming out with darwin’s misinterpretations. Myth anthropomorphism and power also plagues physical sciences as in the lineal time error of ballistics, military power and physical obsession with locomotion or big bang theories of an explosive genesis. So often there is ideology at work to bias truth. It is the case of the arrogance of observer’s paradox invented by heisenberg and bohr. Creationist ‘idealism’ in Physics and Religion vs. scientific organicism. ‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity (arrogance) of man’ Einstein ‘God is the seer of time, with a logic more complex than man’s’ Saint Augustine ‘The body of God is Space, its plenum’ Newton At the risk of offending so early the ‘human believer’ that will not continue reading, missing the upgrade of its scientific or ethic mind, we roughly divide present dominant theories about everything into 1/2th of people who believe mathematical physics has found the meaning of it all in the creationist big-bang, and 1/2th who believe verbal religion knows how God created the Universe, we are trying to ‘reason’, why your dogmatic beliefs, call it ‘science’ supposedly to be ‘reasoning’ or ‘religion’ is today more or less the same: human anthropocentrism; and the only serious scientific explanation of reality is the humble realisation, humans are not the only intelligent species, neither they can perceive the whole Universe in space extension and time duration. In the graph, unlike the modern creationist, linguistic methods of astrophysics and religion, which believe ‘reality is linguistic’, made of two languages shared by God and man, either mathematics or words (a hyperbolic arrogant, anthropomorphic ascientific belief), GST considers as Leibniz did, that the origin of reality is a necessary substance, space-time, siding with Einstein on the philosophical dispute of physics, and considering religion a historic phenomena that expresses the laws of eusocial evolution, of biological origin in the human language of thought, words. The difference is subtle but important. In relational space-time, we consider that the mathematical, spatial and verbal, logic language are derived of the ternary properties of space and time, (so both mathematical equations and dimensions and verbal syntax are ternary mirrors of those properties, which reduce information and simplify the whole ‘to fit’ it in the human or other Universal minds). Again, this is easy proved by the epistemological method: do you see out there ‘space’ and feel ‘time passing’, or are you observing ‘numbers’ and ‘equations’, and ‘words’? When you discompose something, do you see smaller scalar parts which last time and occupy space, or suddenly you see that things are made of ‘smaller numbers’ and ‘little words’? And yet amazing as it seems the human ego is so huge that most humans believe that either his mathematical or verbal language ‘shared’ by God created the Universe – these days we believe images reflect reality. Magritte knew better – the pipe’s drawing is not A PIPE, neither the word ‘pipe’ is the real thing, a wooden object, but three main mirrors-languages of the humind (ab. Human mind): a painting, made with simplified mathematical≈geometrical forms, and ellipse and a catenoid, and a word below. How the GST first principles of a world made of relational space-time beings, differs from the modern methods of astrophysics and religion, the rival theories, in the understanding of the origin of the Universe is obvious: Astrophysics, which strictly followed till the XXc. the scientific method aforementioned, since the wrong quantum interpretation (Copenhagen, as opposed to Einstein->Broglie->Bohm pilot-wave theory, which we deem and shall prove the right interpretation) partially abandoned the experimental, method substituted by a ‘digital, computer method’, based in the belief that the substance of the Universe is NOT time and space but ‘MATHEMATICS’, which merely mimics the arrogant method of religion, which believed that the language of God was ‘words’. So as Mohammed thought that God had created reality by ‘speaking arab’; astonishingly enough since Hilbert affirmed that ‘he imagined points, lines and numbers’, creating maths, humans and God spoke maths and created reality by ‘writing equations’. Few people realise of that ascientific outlook of modern astrophysics, consisting in expressing a model in mathematics, as if the digital language was a magic underlying reality which sufficed in itself, then put it into computer models, publish it and claim it the theory must be truth because it is mathematically beautiful even if there is not much proof of it (often in ‘grand metaphysical theories like the big-bang’, clearly falsified as we shall show, bending with ‘human ambition’ and ‘belief’ experimental data to prove the theory). The big-bang then is the necessary religion for physics to claim to know the meaning of it all. And so we shall deal with it first in this introduction. Religion on the other hand, which we shall show has a historic role as the embodiment in the human verbal language of the laws of the scalar social Universe, simply ignores the method, and establishes with repression of truths, fantasies and ‘beliefs’ his thesis about the Universe, which is not its role. And with a similar method to the Copenhagen interpretation. God spoke the language of certain semitic tribe (hebrew or Arab), which are imperative languages, where the verb goes first (as they were hierarchical, dictatorial societies where the king/aristocracy/banker-priests of its societies barked orders). And so as the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’, the priest spoke in imperative and ‘God had spoken and created’ reality. So we shall show also that while religions do have meaning (all what exists must, remember have a reason, within the organic paradigm), its reach has been overblown; and its method of truth, to believe ‘words are the language of creation’, as in the case of the Copenhagen interpretation, and many modern theories of astrophysics (including string theory and the big-bang) are not truth. We expand in our chapters on epistemology and T.œ that solid analysis of the advantages of a NON-CREATIONIST theory of reality, which unlike the creationist big-bang and Copenhagen interpretation, and creationist religion, departs from a simple concept: an organic, immortal, self-reproductive fractal Universe of information that always existed, always will exist and always will repeat the same entities (including all of us, also immortal in a discontinuous way). The meaning of complex numbers. To start with, it is impossible to fully grasp quantum physics without upgrading our view of complex numbers, so extracted from the post on number theory we bring its proper meaning. Complex numbers are best to represent the social evolution of forms into new scales that emerge as envelopes of wholes with a fleeting transcendental form that seems to us evanescent and not even there when we are looking at it from below in our more dense, lower existence. More generally we can consider the Rashomon effect o complex number and consider it from 4 different perspectives: • ð: As inverse, TEMPORAL numbers. •$: As bidimensional REAL numbers (Bolay) with its own rules of multiplication (a,b) x (c,d) = (ac-bd; ad+bc)
• ≈ As a relationship between quantities represented in the real line belonging to ‘Space’ and in the imaginary line belonging to ‘Time’
• @: As a self-centred polar frame of reference (r, α)
• ∆: And finally when squaring the coordinates, as an ∆§-frame of reference. As this is the new solution found by ∆st theory and yet the most fruitful in the analysis of its true representation of 5D geometries, we shall consider it in more detail.

Of all the views of Complex numbers 2 though are specifically important and clearly related, both in ∆st and number theory, as they correspond to the ∆ð, composite element of reality more complex in itself as we should know by now (: than the s@, simplex spatial lineal @ristotelian mind view in which we can fit the 3 simplex systems of natural, rational and real numbers.

Complex numbers then are something ‘special’, far more connected to the real Universe outside the humind light space-time that we can conceive – hence the difficulty to understand them from the ego paradox of the humind, who confuses its lineal visual world with the Universe, in which it misses the scales that the complex numbers so well describe.

In that regard, the key to understand complex numbers is always in the ‘research’ of reality, its simplex, first historic discoveries, those who explain the Euler identities between its temporal expression (as sine and cosine) and how this cyclical, temporal expression, rises the number, often a physical potential or ∆-1 plane into the exponential, upper or lower, eˆ±iz plane.

The transformation of a world cycle, even in its smaller zero sum actions, which is represented by the sinusoidal functions, which bring about ultimately by the sum of temporal cycles converted into spatial tails of populations into the emergence of the entity into its ∆+1 form, from the simplest representations of potentials in the ∆-1 scale that collapse together into the ∆+1 imaginary part, to the most complex boson experiences of the creation of a social God – no need here to use mathematical languages, verbal wor(l)ds should suffice, open up finally the proper whys of a formalism, which is still considered magic in the world of mathematical physics, where its use has been more fruitful.

Let us then introduce the complex numbers under the Rashomon effect first, to concentrate then in its true form as the numbers of the ∆ð universe, as opposed to the S@ line of the simplex humind.

Complex numbers as expressions of the 3 states: potential past <present wave> future particle

AS WE JUST said Complex space-time ideal for studying ∏imespace world cycles as the previous ones. Since in a complex space, the ‘negative’ arrow inverse to the positive one (Spe<=>tiƒ) are kept separated as lateral i-numbers, by the convention  – initially a fortuitous error of interpretations – than the minus of √-1 cannot be taken out of the √.

It can, but as this was not understood mathematicians maintained the Tiƒ arrow represented by a negative root as a different coordinates. And the result of its combinations with real numbers, gave origin of complex numbers ℂ, which are the best complex numbers to represent the 2 inverse arrows of world cycles of existence.

Thus the complex plane IS when used with the sinusoidal functions a good representation of a world cycle (tumbled, as X+ is 2D:$pe, x- is 1D ðiƒ and in its 3D ∑∏-mature age is i-lateral numbers): Thanks to the ‘serendipitous’ error of earlier mathematicians, which could not conceive negative≈inverse motions, the real line was broken into perpendicular co-ordinates, which are perfect to represent world cycles, where the real line represents Spe (max. size, X-oordiantes) and the imaginary root axis represents information which has min. size, and it is negative, in as much as its development rests ‘entropy’ to the real numbers. This scientists still don’t know and it is a wonder of the ‘deterministic’ Universe that they DO use Cx-numbers to study worldcycles, without knowing what they are and what they study (: i=√-1, is the root of an inverse number, and represents the information of a bidimensional system as Gauss understood when he called them lateral units. It is then fascinating to observe how slowly was the realisation of imaginary numbers as rotary numbers related to time cycles. In fact the general concept of a time worldcycle does not exist in science, so imaginary number is related to specific time worldcycles in physical waves of ∆-3 scales, which in 5D metric: Min. S (max. -i) = Max. ð, have a maximal speed of time cycles. Hence they can complete a time cycle in a very brief span, making possible to study them as recurrent cyclical function of i; which can be further integrated into an eˆ±iz function that will emerge into the ∆+¡ plane. Consider then the most famous example of the use of complex numbers in mathematical physics, not as a calculus device but as an integral part of its form: It is Schrodinger no-time dependent wave of quantum physics. As it is no time dependent, it means it is deterministic: it represents a complete worldcycle of past, present and future fully ‘integrated in the equation’ and related to the h constant of angular momentum (the closed world cycle ‘spin’ of the wave or particle), which cannot and should not be broken apart. And as such it becomes the operator of angular momentum, of ‘time worldcycles’ of waves and particles in quantum physics; even in quantum physicists don’t know it (: So we can study the 3 arrows of time of the quantum wave, conceding the imaginary number in this case to the angular momentum ih operator, or membrain of the wave, which will then surface often in connection with the particle envelope (itself origin of all other extensions of quantum physics, hence the importance of the example). So we write in 5D, the 3 conserved quantities/elements of the schrodinger wave: ∆ø: Vital, potential Energy (3D): Vψ ≈ Singularity: 1D: h²/2m ∇²ψ + 2D: angular momentum: ih ∂ψ/∂t The ‘wave-state’ is a present state; the PARTICLE, or angular momentum that envelops the wave is function which has the i-number (right side). And the way to properly write the equation is therefore, moving the 2 h factors to the right, to form a nice complex number equivalent to the potential that generates both the particle and its kinetic energy. So in the right side we have now the kinetic≈entropic energy of the particle or singularity parameter and its membrane. While in the other side we have the quantum wave itself, its vital energy, which is the potential energy of the wave, Vψ. And both are balanced. In this manner, we obtain a third interpretation besides the expression of Schrodinger and the Bohm’s interpretation, closely related to this one. So the equation understood in terms of the generator reads: Singularity (kinetic≈entropic, moving energy) + angular momentum (represented by i-numbers+ = vital energy (Potential energy) And as any other T.œ, where the singularity and angular momentum encloses its vital energy in balance with it, so does the wave. So in quantum physics as physicists realise with certain surprise, imaginary numbers are not mere ‘artefacts of calculus’ but ‘REAL’ in its meaning, expressed in the graph above. We shall of course extend its ‘reality’ to explain why actually they are also real in electromagnetism, even if the humind prefers to obtain as final result a real, which is less real (: result, but appears as ‘real’ to the unreal human mind (quip intended). THE HUMAN CARTESIAN MIND-PLANE. What is the most important of those planes to mankind? Obviously the one that defines the Humind perspective, which is the one that has the dimension of our ‘space-time’, which is LIGHT! that for that reason is both the limit of transmission of information perceivable by man, and a constant speed force, as we perceive it in the stillness of the mind. Spaces as the a priori reality. The cartesian 3D graph Descartes’ theory is based on two concepts: the concept of coordinates and the concept of representing by the coordinate method any algebraic equation with two unknowns in the form of a curve in the plane. Generator Equation. The 3 Points of view and its geometries & topological planes. There is always a first observer which starts an action of perception in space-time from a perspective that usually is biased by the function of the observer (STi, Se or To coordinates), which correspond to the Cartesian, Cylindrical and spherical, polar coordinates of science The Universe is a sum of a series of action, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane. This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical space-time actions the total reality of any self. But to do so from a merely formal point of view, we do need to consider first the point of view that kicks out the world cycle of actions of any function of existence, ∆o, which is thus the minimal and first Unit-action of the Universe. And this point of view and its relative frame of reference, will start the comprehension of an external reality. Thus the departure point of any mathematical course, should be the definition of the 3 fundamental coordinates which any entity uses to ‘adapt’ the perception of reality to its mind-view and the equation of the mind, which in terms of mathematical co-ordinates writes: 0. O-point x ∞ Universe = constant, static frame of reference. Thus the Observer is not only the dominant element of those 5 actions in the real Universe, but also the initial ‘point of view’ of any mathematical analysis, and analytic geometry rightly the first branch of mathematics to be studied. And as it turns out in the first of many fascinating symmetries between ‘iTS’ and each science (isomorphic, |-space & O-Time, the abb. most commonly used for the 3 components of the Universe), 3 are the fundamental points of view and frames of reference of analytical geometry, each one belonging to a ‘fundamental state’ of being, in the Universe. The temporal polar point of view, centred in the O-point and its external membrane determined by the radius and angle of perception; the cylindrical, lineal, energetic point of view, determined by the lineal axis of the frame of reference or ‘altitude’, the Z co-ordinates, and finally the Cartesian ‘hyperbolic plane’, corresponding to the STi bodies & waves of physical and biological systems. From those 3 ‘mathematical perspectives’ the Universe constructs its vital geometries that we call ‘existential beings’. And so the observer’s causal, logic, cyclical, informative sentient properties that allow it to perceive time cycles are the first questions to inquire. To, is the first element to describe in reality. And it is a frame of reference, an observer, an inertial point in relative fixed form with no motion that can perceive and map the Universe, an O x ∞ constant mapping mind. The observer. Coordinates, the 3 main frames of reference. Now, when move to 3 dimensions, the 3 frames of reference become the 3 bidimensional planes of any of the infinite fractal systems of the Universe: Se(Toroid field/limb)<STi (Hyperbolic wave/body)>Ot (spherical head/particle) Now, the fact that each of the 3 fundamental domains of a space-time organism correspond to one of the 3 fundamental topologies of a 2-3-4D manifold, the planar/toroid, cylindrical≈hyperbolic waves/bodies and spherical particles/heads, and to one of the 3 fundamental 0-points of perception, shows how close mathematics is to reality. In the graph, the 3 subspecies of 2-manifolds have their expression in 3 coordinates, where the Cartesian, is taken as an ‘infinity growing Toroid’ space. The Organisms of the Universe are assemblies of geodesic curves perceived by each of the 3 elements in its corresponding coordinates. This gives also a simple rule to know what kind of element we are studying in different sciences and events (the Se, STi or Ot element): ‘The simplest frame of reference in which a problem formulates indicates which is the ternary topological element we study’. For example, if we can formulate the problem in polar coordinates with an equation simpler than in cartesian coordinates, we will be studying a TO element (as when we formulate a gravitational or charge problem in polar coordinates). If it is easier to formulate in the toroid or the simplified Cartesian graph (a toroid opened along a z-cut), it will be an ‘Se, limb/field problem’; which is the case of most physical problems of ‘lineal motions’; and so on. The conclusion of this duality, is that we are mathematical organisms, with topo-logic properties, which give birth to biological, organic assembles of ternary functions/forms and those systems do have an O-point of view, its frame of reference. In the graph, since the Humind is Cartesian the first and most widely used plane of reference will be a 3D-∑∏ cartesian flat/hyperbolic plane, which mimic – it is homeomorphic – to the ‘vital’ 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space-time. As such our mental spatial reality is a distortion of the Universe suitable for perception in 3D±∆ social colours. And so immediately we observe a correspondence between the FUNCTIONS-FORMS-ACTIONS of light as an organism and its Dimensions used in the humind to build our worldview of the Universe and its T.œs: The actions/dimensions of vital light space-time become the dimensions absorbed by electronic minds (human or digital), which in turn will emerge as vital dimensions of the particle-electron. Huminds thus are constructs of the limited perception we have of light – since (Heisenberg’s principle) we further reduce and smear light information to fit it on the electron. That we reduce further light information is self-evident but treated in the Physical analysis of quantum uncertainty principles. SUFFICE to say that we reduce from each bidimensional holographic plane, or topological variety of form, one dimension to obtain the 3 canonical perpendicular lineal dimensions, which correspond in the humind to the functions of its light-systems: -1D: Height is the function of information where animal systems will place its particle-heads. -3D: Width is the dimension of present reproduction across which animal systems will multiply its cells and reach bilateral symmetry. -2D: Length is the dimension of motion ALONG which systems will move But the mind also observes the social and entropic, evolving and devolving arrows of time to complete a 5D dimension of reality. And this is done with the social/devolving arrows of light, called frequency colours. So humans add the duality of: -Red/magneta: dissolving/dying colours of Entropy and ‘tired’ light as it dissolves into vacuum. -Blue/violet: colours of maximal frequency/form, as blue stars generate its photons. -Green/Yellow: colours of vital energy/information in the intermediate spectra, which are colours of processed plant energy and direct light. So the codes of light and its dimensions create the ‘interpreted’ world of the humind. This was clear to Descartes who called his geometry not Universal, BUT HUMAN; depicting the world as a limited mirror of the total Universe. Since it is the human light space-time mind with its 3 perpendicular magnetic, electric and speed fields what determined the eye-geometry – an electronic machine absorbing light – something Kant also explained when affirming our Mind IS Euclidean because light is Euclidean. So it is fundamental to understand the homeomorphism between the 3 lineal dimensions and the bidimensional REAL topologies, which they simplify. TIME VIEW THROUGH 5D scales requires a complex number perspective. In terms of past, present and future (left side), which is a more general view of the ternary elements on imaginary equations, an i-number rotate sfrom a relative past/future to a relative future/past a function of existence, through a 90° middle angle, that is, the middle ST balanced point, in which the present becomes a bidimensional function, with a REAL, + (relative past-entropic coordinates) and an imaginary, negative (future coordinates) elements. This needs a couple of clarifications: first we move ‘backwards’ in a complex i-graph from future to past as we rotate through i-scales, in as much as most graphs are measuring the ‘motion’ of lineal entropic time which is the relative Spe Function. So the negative side becomes the time function, something which mathematical physics makes obvious, when considering an attractive, informative force-field-potential negative. In the graph, the expression of a world cycle of existence, with broad applications for physical sciences (quantum, electromagnetism) as it describes the ‘unitarian’ cycle of light and electrons (dense fractals of light photons), in its cyclical turns around an atom that constrains its motion, or in its displacement ‘in freedom’ across space, as a function of present iterative motions: Tiƒ (k) / Spe (µ) = ST (C²) (1/√eµ=c IN maxwell expression). The graph shows one of the essential trans-formations of dimensions in the Universe, which form a world cycle of its own, between a ‘real’ potential-limb ∆-1 plane from where it emerges by ‘subtraction’ of an exponential e∧it quantity an ∆+1 particle-head defined by the sinusoidal functions, which seen in a ‘real’ plane, would be flattened into an elliptical orbit, such as: What this essentially means is that the wave state resides mostly in the flat plane and the particle in the imaginary height, and both effect a constant tug of war, and transformation into each other in multiple distinctive dual events, from the particle-stop-gauging information state, to the wave-moving, through the particle enveloping the wave to absorb its energy in a ‘decay exponential rate’, while the wave pushes through the major axis ahead elongating the form, through the particle guiding the wave after gauging information with a change of direction and the wave guiding the particle through its flat path that follows the potential, ∆-1 field and so on and so on… It is only when we have an organic comprehensive view of all the properties of the wave-particle duality not only in its formal classic expression, but through its organic T.œ meanings and actions,when we can really understand quantum physics. To that aim is useful also to square the whole plane and change its perspective to see how the ‘wave’ collapses into the particle vibrational states: Now, when we transfer the imaginary circle to the squared circle it is an interesting process because we obtain an expansion of one dimension which we can then trace laterally to get the R² SQUARE, AND WE SEE HOW ‘REPRODUCTION’ of a sine and cosine circle mimic both reality and the imaginary squared graph, something we express in the realisation that they aths in the imaginary axis might vary but repeat cyclical the form in the z-axis squared. So the complex planes mimic better the generation actions of s=st=t symmetries, with ST in its square plane and S and T in inverted planes, as we have done in the graph with Einstein’s metric. Thus it is a good introduction to the complex plane and its imaginary numbers to fully interpret quantum physics in terms of 5D. Next, we need to accept once and for all that the real interpretation is that of Broglie (adscribed to Bohm), not of Copenhagen. Point. Even if we were not to introduce T.œ 5D new insights on the system, it would be enough to learn that Broglie is the one that fits 5D and just apply it with the ad ons we shall now introduce to explain its whys – faster than c speeds for quantum potential, meaning of entanglement, stop-particle go-wave, envelop-particle, vital body-energy wave and such and such. So next we just shall do this, taken from different waves, explain realist quantum physics and ad comments to further understand its whys. CONCLUSION. THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE AND ITS MULTIPLE LANGUAGES AND PROPERTIES. ‘Creationist astrophysicists’ of the big-bang continuum should if they respect epistemology and science concede defeat and renew Hoyle’s theory of local quasar big-bangs and allowed the fractal theory of the organic Universe to become standard, simply got swept under the rag, and nobody talks anymore of it. In that sense it is important to notice two facts: • That science is a human endeavour and often uses all the tricks of the book, hyperbole, censorship, dogma, etc. to impose half truths. So we must analyse scientific theories with the same ‘criticism’ that religious or philosophical ones. • While astrophysics is still vital to fully grasp the scalar nature of the Universe – and the question more interesting about those self-similar scales is if each atom is a fractal scale similar to a galaxy in an infinite Universe, or both are the true limits of reality; it will NOT reveal the ultimate questions, because they are not concerned with spatial pictures but temporal causality. This is a very important, completely overlooked fact of philosophy of science and the whys of reality: the inquire of knowledge does not end, we shall repeat ad nauseam in the mere collection of data and modelling of pictures, because the Universe is not chaotic. IT DOES HAVE CAUSES AND WHYS. IT IS AN INTELLIGENT, ORDERED, STRUCTURED, MEANINGFUL REALITY. The obsession with machines of measure has reduced a lot the inquire of many scientists, and the overwhelming detail of the trees, makes most to think it is IMPOSSIBLE to find first principles larger than those details, common laws and forms underneath all the species of reality as we shall do here. The visual dominance of our civilisation is making many young people loose even the sense of ‘causality’ – blinding them to even the questioning of all what is not evident. SO IT IS in a way going against trend to pretend to build a rational, causal, time-oriented scalar model of reality because some scales, above us, cannot be pictured as wholes; many forces and networks that connect parts, are dynamic, invisible; time flows of causality cannot be pictured. This, I believe, is a key handicap for a GST to be taken seriously but for those who are ‘intelligent enough’ to go beyond the shallow goals of present science and the visual generation, for those who still make the why-question, the answers are precisely on that scalar structure we cannot picture simultaneously. But why we insist on the organic properties of matter? Easy. Because the existence of a 5th dimension of scalar size and different time clocks, implies an organic structure to the Universe, as faster, smaller parts, synchronise their clocks to form larger wholes, stronger than its parts, and this is an ‘organic structure’, which we shall find in all physical or socio-biological systems. If there were not a 5th dimension of parts and wholes, organicism would make no sense. But all systems do have parts and whole, microscopic cells/atoms and larger wholes. And they establish an absolute arrow of time, besides the 3 cyclical arrows of a world cycle: as wholes come always AFTER parts. So the 5th dimension of eusocial evolution is the absolute arrow of time in the Universe. Each entity’s world cycle between conception and death is a zero sum of relative past to future to past motion. The 5th dimension though is an absolute arrow. Einstein, schrodinger, de broglie and bohm were the discoverers of both, the equations and the right interpretations of it. # ¡+1: Social ¥e: electromagnetism. When dealing with the ‘scales’ of forces that ’emerge’ one from the other, and its disomorphisms of position=space and motion=time, the key questions is to consider how forces predate into each other, and how they combine complementary in symbiosis to form a single ‘whole’. The most obvious case of study, because it happens in our scale along the thermodynamic equations of energy are those of Electromagnetism, which become both the social scaling of the electron (electric current) and its ‘predation’ into ‘form’ by the magnetic field as a bridge towards the emergence of the mass field. So the scaling here is obvious: Electric field/force-> Magnetic field/force -> Mass field/gravitation. Let us consider then Heaviside equations of electromagnetism: $\begin{array}{ll} i)&\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac {\rho} {\varepsilon_0} \\ ii)&\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 \\ iii)&\nabla \times \vec{B} = \mu_0\vec{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}\\ iv)&\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t} \end{array}$ In these equations $\mu_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$ are physical constants, equivalent to Q and G, related to 5D metric that dictate the capacity a volume of space-time has to carry electric and magnetic forces. So, taking them as units we have: $\begin{array}{ll} i)&\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \rho\\ ii)&\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 \\ iii)&\nabla \times \vec{B} = \vec{J} + \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}\\ iv)&\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t} \end{array}$ Where: $\begin{array}{ll}\vec{E} & \textrm{Is the electric field}\\\vec{B} & \textrm{Is the magnetic field}\\\vec{J} & \textrm{Is the electrical current}\\\rho & \textrm{Is the density of electric charge}\end{array}$ To show the TOPOLOGICAL HOMOLOGY of all scales, we shall compare the electric and magnetic fields, “$\vec{E}$” and “$\vec{B}$“, with any thermodynamic fluid. So we can easily understand the homology of the 3 type of ‘space-time vortex: The equations group as 2 equations of Divergence ($\nabla \cdot$) which measure how much a field comes together or flies apart in bidimensional space. So in the homology if “$\vec{W}$” is the flow of water or wind on the surface of the sink: Positive divergence means that the field is “flowing” out of a region. Negative divergence means that the field is “flowing” into a region. When the divergence is zero, then the amount that “flows” in must be equal to the amount that flows out. Curl is how much the field “twists”. In a whirlpool or a tornado all of the curl is in the center funnel, and the field (wind) wraps around where the curl is. If W is the way the wind is blowing, then the tornado is the curl of W. Curl is the “twistiness” of the field, which points around the curl. Although the wind around the tornado is moving, all of the twisting is happening only at the tornado itself. i) $\nabla\cdot \vec{E} = \rho$: This first equation simply states that electric field lines ($\vec{E}$) only start at positive charges ($\rho>0$), and only end at negative charges ($\rho<0$).Electric field lines only begin and end at charges. Any region that contains no charges (or an equal number of positive and negative charges) will have the same amount of field lines entering it as exiting. If a region contains no charges, then the number of field lines entering it is the same as the number of field lines exiting it. Again, “field lines” don’t exist. They’re just a really useful metaphor. ii) $\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0$: This is the magnetic version of the electric equation above. This states that magnet field lines never begin or end. Instead, they must always form closed loops. If magnetic monopoles (“magnetic charges”) existed, then this equation would look exactly like (i). However, there are no magnetic monopoles. The conclusion then is obvious: the magnetic field is the ‘membrane’ that predates the electric field and arises from it, creating an enclosure in a larger space, that ‘absorbs’ the energy of the electric current and the electric field creating a ternary ‘t.œ’, such as: Electric field potential (∆-1: ∑ρ) < Electric body: current (∆o: J) > Magnetic field: head (B) So we have the superorganism of electromagnetism in place. Whereas the magnetic field must ‘exist’ activated by both, its ‘electric body-current’ and its ‘Electric field: potential/limbs. And this is the next Heaviside Law, which shows the Magnetic field to ‘be fed’ by both, body and potential limbs: iii) $\nabla \times \vec{B} = \vec{J} + \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}$: The “J” part: $\nabla \times \vec{B} = \vec{J}$ states that magnetic fields (B) curl around electrical currents (J), containing them: So, an electric current is homologous to the funnel of a tornado, and the magnetic field is the wind whipping around the funnel, caused by it. While the second part of the equation: $\nabla \times \vec{B} = \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}$ means the magnetic field is also fed by the electric field that feeds the current. As a result, current ($\vec{J}$) and changing electric fields ($\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}$) create curl in magnetic fields; $\nabla \times \vec{B} = \vec{J} + \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}$ iv)$\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t}$: But in any system of nature, bodies and heads are complementary, while both ‘feed’ on the ∆-1 limbs/potentials. And so the electric field MUST get back from the magnetic field part of the motion the cyclical magnetic ‘particle’ so to speak, gets from the electric potential, in a similar quantity but with an inverse direction signified by the negative sign. So like the last equation, this equation states that a changing magnetic field creates curl in the electric field: If you have an electric field that curls in a circle, then you can generate current and electrical power. A changing magnetic field creates curl in the electric field. So if you increase the magnetic field through a loop of wire, there will be an electric field along the wire (tornado makes wind along the fence). When an electric field runs along a wire it pushes charges along it. Induced current! So if you’ve got a loop of wire sitting next to a magnet, there will be no current. But, it you move that magnet, the magnetic field through the loop changes, and there will be current: $\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t}$ Unlike in equation (iii), there’s no “J” moving electric charge or “magnetic charge”, since then you could have “magnetic current”, and there would be a magnetic current term in equation (iv). But because a loop is a fractal point with width observed from a larger scale, when we move ‘upscale’ to the mass field, the magnetic field will be ‘seen’ from the cosmological scale as a ‘magnetic monopole’ from the relative larger scale of the mass enclosure and so it will also contribute (Relativity) to the mass scale. The speed of light: Since Heaviside’s equations impliy that changing electric fields created magnetic fields (iii) and that changing magnetic fields created electric fields (iv), electric and magnetic fields can sustain each other without the need for electrical charges or currents, by predating in symbiosis the lower electric potential; and so we might wonder what is that lower ∆-1 potential from which both obtain motion, and it is indeed the lower ∆-1 photon/light space-time (particle/wave duality), which forms the background space-time of the galaxy. And so it should be evident that this lower potential light space-time is the plenum/body from where all other scales will arise and as such the minimal form of information, and maximal speed of reproduction of both the magnetic and the electric field; whose derivation by Maxwell (the other 4 are ‘Heaviside equations!!’) is simple as we can eliminate Charges, to study this background spacetime alone, so, with Maxwell’s equations in vacuum with no charges, no currents, give us: $\begin{array}{ll} i)&\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 \\ ii)&\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 \\ iii)&\nabla \times \vec{B} = \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t}\\ iv)&\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t} \end{array}$ So we solve for the electric field, taking the time derivative of (iii) and then plugging in (iv) yields: $\begin{array}{ll}\mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \vec{E}} {\partial t} = \nabla \times \vec{B} \\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = \nabla \times \frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} \\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = \nabla \times \left( -\nabla \times \vec{E} \right)\\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = -\nabla \times \left( \nabla \times \vec{E} \right) \end{array}$ Whereas by Vector calculus: $\nabla \times \left( \nabla \times \vec{A} \right) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \vec{A}) - \nabla^{2}\vec{A}$ So: $\begin{array}{ll}\mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = -\nabla \times \left( \nabla \times \vec{E} \right)\\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = -\nabla(\nabla \cdot \vec{E}) + \nabla^{2}\vec{E}\\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = -\nabla(0) + \nabla^{2}\vec{E}\\\Rightarrow \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = \nabla^{2}\vec{E}\\\Rightarrow \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}\nabla^{2}\vec{E}\\\Rightarrow \frac{\partial^2 \vec{E}} {\partial t^2} = \left(\frac{1}{(\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}}\right)^2\nabla^{2}\vec{E}\end{array}$ And since $\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0$ we get the general wave equation: $\frac{\partial^2 \vec{A}} {\partial t^2} = v^2\nabla^{2}\vec{A}$, where A is a wave, and v is the propagation speed of that wave. So, the electric field E, propagates as a wave at $v = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}} = 2.99 \times 10^8 m/s$(light speed). And since by Galilean Relativity all physical laws are independent of how fast you’re moving C speed is independent of how fast we’re moving as Einstein realized to buld its Relativity theory. The Rashomon effect on electromagnetism. Ternary arrows of time: st-fields, s-potentials and t-charges. Nt. We use often the term field instead of potential to describe the entropic scale, ∆-2 from where a system obtains its motion, as physicists tend to confuse both terms. Probably it would be better to use the term ‘potential’, instead of field, which I will from here on -T.œ being always in flux as it is the singularity-mind still of a single human being): It follows from what it has been said, that there should be at least 3±1 formulations of the electromagnetic field in terms of the 3 arrows of time, as it is the case: S-Potential. ST-field, tƒ: charge: three approaches are customarily discussed, as the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic vectorial fields (present wave, st, the commonest), potentials (fields proper, the entropic, scattered solution), and charges with currents (the tƒ solution). It should be notice that the Potential$pe description must have less ‘dimensions/ parameters’ than the wave description. As a general rule deduced from the properties of space and time, ‘entropy has the minimal number of dimensions, 2, for each ‘bidimensional field’, in this case 4 parameters; while the ST-liquid/wave description as a general rule must have the whole S≈T ternary symmetry effect, 3+3 parameters. And such is the case, the electric and magnetic fields together had six components to solve for. In the potential formulation, there are only four components:

the quantum potential

While the above presentation introduced the guidance equation as fundamental, the quantum potential For the phase of the wavefunction  holds:

∂S (∇S)² h²∇²R −∂t=2m+V−2mR .

Due to the similarity with the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation (for the action S) the term ∝ h ̄2 has been baptized quantum potential . Within the Hamilton- Jacobi theory the particle velocity is constraint to m·v = ∇S, which corresponds to the guidance equation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory. If one adopts the quan- tum potential formulation the motion along the Bohmian trajectories can be thought of as taking place under the action of a novel quantum-force . However, the guidance equation can be motivated e.g. by symmetry arguments (Dürr/Goldstein/Zanghi, 1992) and needs no recourse to the Hamilton-Jacobi theory. Moreover, in Goldstein (1996) it is argued that the quantum potential formulation is misleading since it suggests that the deBroglie-Bohm theory is just classical mechanics with an additional potential (or force) term. But the deBroglie-Bohm theory is a rst-order theory (i.e. the velocity is constrained by the position already) and this important trait is disguised in the quantum potential formulation.

Whether this ambiguity in the formulation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory should be viewed as a substantial debate or a secondary matter depends on the context. These two readings of the theory have certainly a great deal in common and in comparing the de Broglie-Bohm approach with standard quantum mechanics the distinction between these di erent schools is usually irrelevant. However, more detailed discussions which involve subtleties regarding e.g. the status of the wavefunction or particle properties have to pay attention to these di erences.

∆§: The four fundamental approach in classic electromagnetism is the current description, which is the social scaling of electricity.

• The mind approach, includes the human pov deformation from the perspective of our tools of measure. It is  the 4 vector solution of relativity, which roughly speaking can be considered the ∆• mind solution as it introduces the paradoxes of ‘mind stillness’ in the measure of beings (paradox of Galileo).