Home » “@tº≈∫exi∂st » singularities=g@ds




“The Universe is the body of an organism (t.œ.), whose logic mind (∆§) we call God.’ Plato

‘We are all Gods, the unmoved center of a body of energy’ Aristotle – best ever definition of a mind-singularity, the linguistic mapping and will of existence of any super organism of space-time.


In the graph, the Monad, or center of the will of the system, or T.Œ (timespace super organism). But as we have already described it in depth in our first line, ‘@Monad’, we want now to consider a philosophical question: the mind as an aristotelian God, still linguistic center of all the energy-body that is its territory around which it orders ad totally controls. The singularity as the max. informative point or local god of a system is what Aristotle thought of, when he shouted ‘we are all gods’. As in those earlier pythagorean, Greek ages, the simplicity of the game without much detail, rationally analysed revealed as in CHINESE taoism, the first principles of reality in a clear form.

WE shall thus explore the ‘metaphysical equations of God and its meaning’ in different scales, centering in the 2 final mysteries of existence: how gods singularities create reality through mirrors that project its linguistic still minds on the Universe? And what is the origin of the will of existence of those minds. Are they automatons of a mirror program of creation? Or there is even beyond perception a final level of awareness of existence that pull us into willing to fight for it?

The answer which can only search by considring the homology of all space-time beings, hence looking into human beings is Yes: SENSATION more than perception is the LAST DUAL, pain and pleasure game that seems to exist in man as its final will and should also exist in Nature.


Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

Thus instead of monads, we use here a simple symbol for GOD, taken from Greek letter, for the Generator of time arrows, for the topologic combination of lines and cycles, which form a spatial ternary symmetry: |x 0=Ø, and for the ∆-infinite scales of its ‘plenum’ body of space, where fractal parts of it become super organisms, gods of existence. Many variations on the same theme, specially on the central ‘vowel’ can be used, º•Œø∞, as a mind, as an infinitesimal infinite as a super organism as a topology as an infinite dries of scales.

We  highlight three components of all realities: Γ, the three ARROWS/ages of time that generate it ,Φ the three topologies of space across the three scales ∆, of its super organism.

it is god then just the program of creation of super organisms?  And as such always a ratio a balance, a domain within the limits of ∆±i of the domain?

I think so. Thus in this manner ΓœΔ will bring the three elements, time generation, organic topology, scalar, fractal form.

As we are all super organisms made to the image and likeness of god.

We all have Γime Φ-Space & ∆-scalar dimensions We are all gods, we are all super organisms. The existence thus of a Universal particle, or god’s particle, the suer organism, Œ=ΓΦΔ thus closes the third line between the mind and the whole, the first and final isomorphism that describe all beings as both dºst of space-time and a Universal God, dust=dºst.

We shall close this third line on ‘the different functions of exi≈st¡ence§’ of the Universe with the study of the concept of God, as the whole of all wholeness –  Logos≈Mind of the Universal body, in a platonic sense, as the absolute cano of the cave, of which all its fractal parts are  made to its image and likeness – the point of absolute future, of the 5th dimension, of two imaginary time parts, singularity point of no reference, that does not exist ever in present, asymptotic to it:

Max. i

When we say that pure form does not exist, neither pure energy is because the game is never perfect except in the whole that never dies block of 5Dimensions where all the potential games are written.

God both in the Universe at large and the Human Wor(l)d, our Space-Time domain of perception is the pure form of immortal logic time – the world cycle of all world cycles, which never ends as it repeats itself in simultaneity non-locality, at every scale, composed of:

G, Γ, Gamma, the Generator equation that defines its actions

0, •, its fractal 0-point, black hole Mind, Aristotelian still point of maximal density of information≈attraction of the Universe,

D, ∆, Delta its infinite scales.

Form in Space, Mind in time, Future in its infinite scales and hence in its distances – and yet purely as Plato envisioned a canon never to be reached except in the whole infinity itself

5D best




In the graph, the Absolute God of the Universe IS its mind of maximal information. Is that point conscious or impersonal? We can compare it with human Gods, the point of maximal information of a Human Superorgansim – its ‘self’ in the ∆ scale of individuals, a neuronal group of the brain; its prophets in the ∆+1 scale of societies; an informative master of the wor(l)d; its DNA in the ∆-1 scale of biological cells. All those ‘human gods’, ‘create’ the future of its systems, organism, society or cell with its logic patterns of information.

So such are the concepts of a personal God, or brain-mind with absolute control of the system that apply to a personal view of God and extrapolated to the Universe, gives the Black Hole, or gravitational brain of information as the God of the system, whose internal ‘chemical mind’ (Maldacena’s equations which show a black hole to have a 5D ‘homunculus’ representation of the 4D electromagnetic galaxy) controls the body of stars of its galactic plane, as the brain controls your cells.

But there is an impersonal Taoist concept of God as the game of existence and creation with the rules expressed in ¬Æ logic terms in this blog. For eastern religions, Ch’ang, God is the game of creation of yin and yang – the isomorphic laws of space-time that all systems obey, including the ‘God-brains’ of any scale of Organisms of the Universe.

And this God can be accessed by any part of the Universe made to its image and likeness, making you communicate and dissolve with the whole in a mystique experience I have lived now alone in this planet for 30 years and counting…

As we have studied in depth this impersonal god all over this web, we shall now concentrate a bit more in the personal God in the Human social scale of super organisms, which is the commonest concept of verbal god, humans better understand.

Personal God – Max. Tiƒ.

Perhaps the closest description of God is that of the mind of a territory of order, by a future fractal point that moves the territory in synchronous motions around its self.

For each discontinuous whole, god is it point of maximal information, or self with the will to order the super organism in which the point of knowledge is inscribed. It follows that god has more information than the point of knowledge, and as such there are degrees of god, regarding how high in the size of the god, we are talking on the scale of super organisms, from where we deduce that god is the logic mind of the Universe – in formal terms, the fractal generator:

Impersonal god = ∆±∞ ($t<∑e∏i>ð§)

which FOR THE SCALES OF DECAMETRIC infinity we perceive as human beings, is the scale of atoms-galaxies, which are the limits we perceive and the game of existence of its super organisms. In other words, the future is created by the Tiƒœ point of maximal information that is in the Universe, the relative quark-black holes of each atomic-galactic system. But humans do not use the word ‘god’ in that sense, so we must explore what ‘god’ as a human semantic word means in our scale.

God in its commonest verbal expression means the most intelligent, informative point of the Universe. Yet as the Universe is a fractal of infinite self-similar TSymmetries of space-time, God can be defined by a simple equation, as the relative point of future of a super organism or whole of wholes, common set of all sets of superorganisms of fractal points in a 5Dimensional Universe:

Personal God= Max. ð§



I. Personal, Aristotelian Gods

II. Impersonal, ® God.

III. Human Gods: western and eastern religions.




“God is the unmoved (perceptive) center of a body of energy, moving around it”. “We are all Gods (of our super organisms” Aristotle

Fractal points: the fundamental particle

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.

However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.

This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.

That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           =========== o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: To be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.

‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’

This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.

Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplify entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.

Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles.

Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).

In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘—motions’ or information in parallel networks. Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-Sp Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘—motions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.

This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.

All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms:

humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘—motions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.

A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.

Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.

For example, a human feeds on ‘—motions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our actions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.

The Œ-points: monads that order the Sentient Universe.

This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆-mind – we can now explain:

O (infinitesimal Œ-point or mind) x ∞ (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)

What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.

So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.

On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.

And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can  shrink  a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information.  So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.

So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of space-time, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

How the mind vitalises the i-logic geometry of perception of flows of energy and information, with inverse expansions in perpendicular space to that of its frequency, simply, by transferring vitalling transformations of topological views, and hence beating in an orderly manner, repeating certain moves of the function of existence, and its simplex, logic games.

So when we do a move in logic mental space in vital mathematics, and it is allowed it means the topological beings which are made of those frames of reference – its simplified mind-mapping mirrors, it is happening in reality. We have extracted information to make a mind view of it, by just most often leaving in the mind a calculus of variations of maximals and stop and go points, but the result is this: the organism has 3 topologies, 3 points of view that frame referentially those 3 topologies and 3 states of existence whose entropic, informative and reproductive functions are maximised by those topological organs:

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

The universe is commanded by mirror symmetries of minds of space-time, we can approximately represent with cartesian coordinates, in hyperbolic cylindral or polar form

The singularity mirror or mind plays a mental mirror in the control of the game of existence. So to know what the mirror plays is to know the game.

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5th dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Eucidean world.

Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 19.32.01

The most fascinating of the 3 varieties of bidimensional space times is the sphere, which can shrink in size without limit (Poincare conjecture). Thus all systems have external sensorial membranes that transfer information to a central zero point, defining a general equation for all minds:

0-point=mind x ∞ World = Constant mapping of the Universe.

Thus the 5th dimension, requires both a better understanding of Non Euclidean geometry and the holographic principle of the bidimensional cosmos.

I called this Non-E geometry of 2-manifolds, i-geometry, the next letter, so we shall use it from here on. It became evident that the true advance of our comprehension of space and time was dual: on one side to return to the concept of infinite cyclic times, measure by frequency (the speed of the cycles), which is the inverse equation to lineal duration (the length of all those cycles put together): ƒ: Tƒ=1/duration=1/T.

The creation of dimensional membranes, in layers, in which motion and form are the same sides of the same lineal space concept, |-s, give us a growing universe of increasing scales and dimensions.

Now it must be stressed to give enough mathematical rigor and qualitative accuracy to this blog that information is similar to Temporal Form, as it is carried by time clocks.

Further on information is proportional to the frequency of those time clocks in its volume. And the message of the information is carried in the form of the waves or fixed form we perceive. But temporal form is NOT the same mathematical concept that what Shannon and other ‘humans’  defined as information. Since for humans information is in-form-ation, form-in-action, that is,  form which is communicated and perceived by a human receptor, and so it is carried normally by waves, that add a lineal component of spatial speed, or motion to the pure temporal form of the clocks of time.

The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑ST; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages.

In the graphS, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.


How language interferes with reality. The Universal Grammar of all languages.

In Newton’s model there are ‘beings’, whose substance is not considered but reduced to Euclidean ‘points with no volume’  that exist in a background abstract frame of reference, mimetic of the Cartesian graphs Newton used to do its calculus (as if God had drawn a mathematical graph in the ‘background of reality’) independent of those beings. Thus this model, which merely ‘translates’ the linguistic tool of the mind – the Cartesian mathematical graph, and affirms IS reality, is called ‘background independent’ space-time. Yet as there is NO experience of that background (there is no absolute vacuum, vacuum is always ‘something’ that ‘fills’ – ultimately light radiation, or ‘background radiation’, so ultimately space still IS light space), this concept seems to be a basic ERROR of logic thought, expressed by Kant – to confuse REALITY with LANGUAGE.

So in the same manner religions say that the language of time humans use to describe reality with ‘verbs’ is GOD, the reality itself, scientists, specially physicists say that the language we humans use to express reality, mathematics is REALITY itself. This ‘simple’, tautological way to define everything goes in science from Newton’s absolute space-time to quantum interpretations of particles as probabilities.

But it IS wrong – a human linguistic ego-trip, similar to that of Abrahamic religions, where ‘The word thy God became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John’s 1.1.).  And it is also a simple way to give up in the explanation of reality. Reading Newton one notice immediately that because he couldn’t explain what caused gravitation, he came to the conclusion that ‘gravitation’ was a mathematical background space-time. Point. So goes for the quantum masters who could not explain why particles were waves and particles at the same time, and why they could not control them (uncertainty of measure, different behavior in experiments, etc.). So they decided particles and waves were the mathematical tool they used to express them (probabilities).

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Monadology, Leibniz, the master of relational space-time.

‘God is the unmovable one, the primary cause which moves all the energy of its surrounding vital space’.

‘We are all Gods. And there are infinite of them.’ Aristotle, Metaphysics. The master of verbal thought.

Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we pass now into the second architectonical level of reality, that of knots of time cycles, existential points, œ.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±SxT, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximize its existence, Max. ST, in a state of perpetual balance, Sp=Tƒ…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane.

The Universe of communicative Monads.

We thus define in this post the logic postulates of non AE (non-Aristotelian, Euclidean geometry), and its Πfunctions of existence departing from the first postulate of mathematics:

A point is a system of energy and information, perceived as an infinitesimal from a higher plane of existence.

In the beginning there was an observer, a focus point that let itself cross by infinite parallels and perceived a mapping of the Universe.

The infinitesimal point, O, saw the infinite Universe, ∞, and created a constant mapping of it, 0 x ∞ = Constant, in the stillness of the mind.

The point, the Observer the measure is the first action that starts any activity in reality. Prior to motion towards a field of energy or information that interest us or away from it, the point must perceive it. And for that to be possible, the point must have parts, an informative mind –like capacity to gauge information, and rotational motion to change the angle of view.

The point thus have to have angular momentum, the minimal unit observable in the Universe, the h action, a point of view a momentum moving and a radius of distance.

The fundamental Unit of the fractal universe thus is also a point that makes up an absolute space-time, but such points unlike Euclidean classic points of mathematics are fractal non-Euclidean points, which have breath, hence are cycles, the minimal unit of the Universe a time cycle, seen in statics as a cyclical point, dynamically as an attractive point-particle in a static position or a particle with momentum, neutral to a background universe.

Reality is made of symmetries of the 3 motions of time and its infinitesimal, step by step view as spatial forms. This interaction carries to all spheres of reality expressing itself as many different dualities.

We thus can obtain always a still spatial vision or dimensional vision and a dynamic, motion vision of temporal vision and all mathematical equations in geometry of points can be perceived as motion equations, of dynamic differential equations.

We are talking thus of temporal algebra and spatial geometry, of Æ and Œ, as the 2 branches of the i-logic geometry of fractal points that constructs the still spatial forms and membranes we perceive as static presents, and how they web with the entropic, vibratory and vortex motions of the 3 dimensions of time.

We call a knot of such space-time cyclical actions an Πfunction of existence. It is perceived as a fractal point which rows in size as we come closer to it, till we observe its two parts, the vortex of cyclical time, 0 and the flows of lineal entropy, Sp, which come out of its present, most evident body-wave part with its combined energy and information parts.

This Function of Existence will be seen in time as a series of sequential motions, physical momentums in which the Πparticle becomes the active magnitude that exchanges energy and information with the outer, larger world.

Its description as it transits and leaves a memorial reflection of its motions in the form of space distances, conforms the description of the existence of any being, which goes into a sequential order of absorption and emissions of energy (feeding and moving) and information (perceiving and reproducing), through which it creates more stable sequential dual action-reaction fields of density with other similar cloned Œ which will become networks and parts of synchronic super organisms. In this manner forms evolve into social wholes and create in this process the 5th dimension or arrow of ‘long time’, in which parts are relative pasts of future forms, which from the larger pov command their existence.

Infinite of such points exchanges energy and information in infinite scales is the departing point of any scale of realty to understand how it builds above and below itself O±∆ superorganisms.

 The equation of the mind and the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry.

A hyperbola is perceived as a cycle from the 0point in the center of reference. that is how we are. We are a Œ point but perceive a hyperbola of the Universe. We are nothing and we perceive it all – the entire curve of the hyperbola has 2 focus, but the point that matters is the Œ point.

In the beginning there was an observer, a focus point that let itself cross by infinite parallels and perceived a mapping of the Universe.

This original point might be considered infinite or infinitesimal, God or microbe, the unmoved one, of the eternally moving. But there was no other inertial frame of reference but the one he perceived.

And it was of course, a polar one, the perfect form, the 2-sphere.

Did he started the Universe by the mere fact of co-existing with it? Was he looking at its inside forms? We do not know this metaphysical questions but we can describe bio-topo-logically the first point in existence.

The infinitesimal point, O, saw the infinite Universe, ∞, and created a constant mapping of it, 0 x ∞ = Constant, in the stillness of the mind.

The point, the Observer the measure is the first action that starts any activity in reality. Prior to motion towards a field of energy or information that interest us or away from it, the point must perceive it. And for that to be possible, the point must have parts, an informative mind –like capacity to gauge information, and rotational motion to change the angle of view.

The point thus have to have angular momentum, the minimal unit observable in the Universe, the h action, a point of view a momentum moving and a radius of distance.

The fundamental Unit of the fractal universe thus is also a point that makes up an absolute space-time, but such points unlike Euclidean classic points of mathematics are fractal non-Euclidean points, which have breath, hence are cycles, the minimal unit of the Universe a time cycle, seen in statics as a cyclical point, dynamically as an attractive point-particle in a static position or a particle with momentum, neutral to a background universe.

Infinite of such points exchanges energy and information in infinite scales is the departing point of any scale of realty to understand how it builds above and below itself O±∆ superorganisms.

But the infinitesimal point to be noticed and exist must at least ‘think’, observe, perceive with a certain angle a part of reality converted into mind mapping.

And this can be measured with the simplest, smallest quanta, the angular momentum of a system, the h-derivative increase, the ∆minimal action of perception.

ƕ: angular momentum = h-derivate.

Objective vs. subjective perception

If the fundamental differentiating, ‘external’ property of species in the Universe are the Metrics of the 5th dimension (∆=Sp x Tƒ), which makes them belong to different inverse scales of size in space and energy volume (Sp) vs. speed of temporal information), the essential equalitarian feature is the co-invariance of that product, which gives them the same value when considered, ‘internally’ from the inner point of view of the system,

Since from the inner ‘measure’ of time, the smaller, faster clocks of a diminutive being, process the same amount of information in its life span than the larger being. So an insect which lives a maximal of 7 years (queen ants, elephant cockroaches), since it processes information 10 times faster than we do – reason why we don’t catch a fly – it actually lives as much as we do, 7 x10=70 years.

This is the wisdom of the 5th dimension: all selves feel the center of the Universe they measure from their Non-Euclidean fractal point of view, which has from ‘its’ perspective as much information as the entire Universe do.

The mind self-equation:

O(infinitesimal point of view) x ∞ (infinite, perceived Universe) = C∆ (constant mapping of the whole)

nicely puts it in perspective.

Topology explains it: the sphere is the only topology that can shrink without limit of tearing, allowing the reduction of the infinite into the infinitesimal (Poincare conjecture).

The 5th postulate of non-Sp geometry also defines it.

Let us then start with the usual methodology of ‘building dimensional blocks’ of ST theory, by considering the Spatial location of Minds, as the center of maximal communication of a system.



 Recap. We exist in a perceptive UNIVERSE OF ∞ ‘DIMENSIONAL WORLD-MINDS’



Screen Shot 2015-09-09 at 14.38.55

Time motions break absolute space into bidimensional space-time membranes.  Tiƒ: fractal, i-logic, non-Euclidean, cyclical points of view: the fundamental particle

We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:

‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’ Plato

So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.

Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.

5D best

 The Mind’s point of view – the ∆-enter.


In the graph, a mystical representation of the mind, as the central triangle of a tetraktys. The mind is the ‘fractal point of view’ (mathematical interpretation) or Œ point, in which maximal flows of information converge, both from the external and the internal regions of the being, where the will of the ‘4 actions’ resides. 

The Mind is the ‘point of view’, site of the will that perceives each element, each part.

It is the ∆-centered dimension, in the sense that it is the most ‘connected’ point, in the center of the system, which ‘reflects’ upon the existence of the whole.

In mystique terms it is in a way the soul, the atman. It is the central number of maximal communication in the tetraktys that Pythagoras rightly considered the perfect number, illustrated in the Kabala graph above.

In Physic-mathematical terms it is the final black hole, non-Euclidean point of view of the system. It is the 10th or 11th dimension of Time on the string formalism, etc.

In biological systems it is the nervous, ’10th system’ that integrates the other 3×3, energy/reproductive/informative physiological systems of the human being.

Depending on which ‘human jargon’ with more or less errors – lacking the ∆ST formalism and GST philosophy – we talk of, it will be ‘named’ with different forms.

I often use the term the 5th Dimension, of all ∆-scales of the being, to represent the ‘whole’. And so we have termed it also as the 5th ‘invariance’ or ‘isomorphism’ that all beings share, since the mind-self, the centered dimension of all scales, the 5 isomorphism of nature, the point of view, the soul is the most important dimension of all beings.

It wraps up all the other dimensions, isomorphisms and scales.

And it is therefore the center of its 3×3 ∆±4 Fractal scales, its 3 topological space organs, and its 3 time ages (the being is at its maximal force, in the ST (S=T) steady state mature, adult age of balance, ST, age of maximal duration.

In man obviously is the brain, expression of the ‘Whole’ or ‘Soul’, which perceives internally the system through its ∑3×3 networks (our sensations of the energy, digestive system, the reproductive, endocrine system, and the mind thoughts and emotions) and externally through the senses. But in many other systems is a very different site.

Geometry of Multiple Spaces-Times: fractal creation.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time Arrows constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms. And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe.

In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind. In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

  • Recap: The universe is a game of creation and destruction of networks of fractal knots of time cycles=œ-points.

So perhaps the best definition is that of Non-Sp mathematics: the ‘point of view’, the part of the fractal point that gauges maximal information. 


What is God in the fractal Paradigm, of an organic Universe?

The answer is obvious: The super organism of the cell/species we study, from the lower point of view of a citizen cell. As in a discontinuous Universe, each super organism is a world in itself, a whole, the individual cell will see that whole as all what it is and call it God, or in a more restricted manner call god the point of maximal information of the system, Max. Tiƒ, or mind of God. So humans expanded their concept of God, as they expanded their view of the Universe.



In the graph, humans slowly departed from their subjective ego-trips of  the mythic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the tribe first and then mankind was the centre of the Universe, to a scientific world, and within it again, moved away from the Earth as its centre (Ptolemy), in 3 steps. So first they abandoned the ‘who’ of a personal god, into the ‘what’ of a centered earth, a sun, as its centre (Copernicus) and finally the galactic light space-time at its centre (Einstein’s relativity). It is now the time to give the final step into Absolute relativity considering the Fractal paradigm and its 5th dimension, which further stretches to all Universal Planes the understanding of the laws of science, without primacy of any of such scales.

The Superorganism, the game of creation and extinction of super organisms, the world cycle of super organisms, the mind of the super organism, from the perspective of the cell-citizen of the biological or sociological super-organism, the physical, biological or social system is included within. For the absolute relative fractal Universe, two functions are obviously the functions of God:

The Fractal Genrator of super organisms and its ternary symmetries, which describe the word cycle of the super organism:

Sp <ST>Tƒ

and its Tiƒ, function of maximal information or brain that directs from a higher plane of existence, ∆+1, the co-existing cycles of space-time of its smaller atoms/cells/citizens (physical, biological and social super organisms) having an absolute control of its fields of energy, information and reproduction, from the perspective of its neuron cells


In the graph, human anthropomorphism in science peaked in the german, idealist school of Hilbert when mathematics not only remained ‘Galileo’s language of god’ but became invented by the human brain, who became ‘God’. One of the biggest limits of human knowledge is precisely the null understanding of the relationships between languages and reality, and how languages evolve as everything else from a first ‘epic’ age of maximal simplicity when they seem magic truths – so writing first conveyed the feeling it was absolute truth and the pharaoh said it has been written.

Mirrors were considered magic holding the soul of the observer, because they were so ‘exact’, and mathematics a very recent language still holds this magic, mirror image. Only the true connoisseurs know of its imperfections, describing, only a part of all the properties of the being. Yet what makes of mathematical physics such ‘naive religion’, is the denial that there is anything worth to know outside the ‘reduced’ image of the mirror.

O-points: minds and its languages of information≈Perception.  Eyes of time: Monad. The still mind: The logic explanation of the Galilean paradox. 

Now this much wider vision of time and the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Hegel, the last serious formulation of the Spatial entropy x Temporal information=Space-time arrows Fractal Generator (thesis-antithesis=Synthesis) .

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

O x ∞ = ∆±1: The equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in a single Universe.

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:mm

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of ∞ mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries. This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.45.10

In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. In posts on i-logic geometry we develop a pangeometry of all possible non-Euclidean minds of the Universe. We conclude that each mind is a monad, a fractal point crossed by an enormous numbers of rays of information, which create a specific mind, mirror of the Universe, with less volume of information and more stillness to fit in the point. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons.

So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists.  It is far easier to construct a simpler model apt for measures with a single mechanical time-clock and a single Cartesian graph of space, self-centered in the human ‘light space-time’ (we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believers to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’.

In the opening montage of cyclical systems of space time, we can see how all what exists is a fractal system made of vital space, with kinetic motions, encoded and informed by accelerated clocks of time, self-centered in a relative point of view or frame of reference that holds together the system. In the graph we can indeed see a small sample of fractal systems, in which a central first point of view, once it is born, reproduces in waves of clone forms, which then reorganize into an static form with a classic order – a fractal which seen from THE SELF-centered perspective is a form of consciousness growing and dying as it performs a world cycle of existence.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

The ego is as Buddha and Descartes understood a Maya of the senses

Thus now we can respond why we perceive reality both as motion and stillness. The answer is in the ternary structure of all beings, self-centered by a mental point of view.

We are all self-centered, fractal organisms of vital space, tracing world cycles.

So now we must deal with the consequences for knowledge of the ego paradox, which is mainly our belief that only human minds are intelligent and so its languages.

And so we must fully grasp the fact that we humans are not that important in the fractal Universe, but just a ‘fractal organism’ in one of its many relative scales, and our ‘intelligence’, that is, the languages of information we use to perceive the Universe, mainly logic words to perceive time, mathematical geometry to perceive space, are also not ‘special’, and they do not create the Universe or are the ‘languages of god’ as religious people and pythagorean physicists believe.

Since the main problem to objectively grasp, the  nature of reality as a fractal, organic system is that subconscious bias of all humans of all ages and all disciplines of reason or belief, against Nature, due to our ego-trips that make us happy only when we are the centre of the Universe as individuals and species.

Fractal Minds: ∞ worlds

Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations, which ‘are real’.

T.Πdoes show by regressing a step back in the scaffolding of mathematics and defining those terms, as the Postulates of i-logic geometry, based in the structure of cyclical time, fractal space and the 5th dimension where:

1) A fractal point grows in size when we come closer to it, so it has parts, its O-mind and its E-field flows of energy or limbs. Hence we define it as Œ, an existential point.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-Planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.


Truth: the Rashomon effect and Disomorphic method.

VITAL processes are THUS the whys of all abstract topological configurations. And dualities and ternary symmetries are the elements that construct those configurations as all is yin yang and qi, that is motion, form and energy that combines them. Easy? Isn’t?

You and anything else, is just a super organism of space-time ‘dust’:

s≈t, spatial minds (S@), ≈body waves of energy and cyclical membranes, ∆ð.

And so properly written we talk of a Universe of five elements we shall always use as the bare theoretical minimum to acquire meaningful information about an event or form of space-time.

Finally to intoduce the meaning of truth in languages, as we only perceive reality from a linguistic mirror of the mind, which means absolute truth only happens in the being which has all the information about itself:

Total truth of the being = One (probability, one being) in the being in itself.

So an external observer only will have a linguistic mirror view, with less information. And as each language is better fit to extract different properties (math, spatial; logic, temporal; sight, space-time; ethics, social and so on), it is best a kaleidoscopic view of the being with different languages, to extract the maximal information):

Maximal truth of the being = ∑ linguistic points of view on the 5th dimensions of the entity, (∆@S≈T).

This is the justification of the Rashomon method of casting 5 different perspectives in ceteris paribus analysis often with different languages, to extract its maximal information; which in the more complete “Disomorphic method’ (3rd line) will double in space and time symmetries the perception of the being through a dual qualitative=quantiative, time=space symmetric perspective with 10 ‘different analysis’ of increasing complexity that develop the being from its initial seed to its plugging within the larger Universe of social scale and discontinuous planes from where it absorbs its energy and information…

Let us then resume the 5 elements that conform any ‘time§pace organism of the Universe’, its fractal scales, spatial forms, temporal motions and the @-mind or system that connects all its parts, feels it as a whole and puts it in motion in the outside world…


All this said, perhaps the biggest problem of humanity and science, which after all is a product of the human mind is not its relative ignorance of the first principles of reality – as it simply works with a single ‘arrow’ of time, lineal motion, when there are 5 Dimensions of it, but its astounding arrogance. I never met an ‘specialist’ or ‘scholar’ who did not think he knew his discipline.
And physicists, which humans, since they invented the mechanical clock, have given them the ‘title’ of seers of time, are perhaps the most arrogant and ignorant of them all.
Of course all this has a direct explanation, when we define mathematically the equation of a ‘spatial mind’ or finitesimal 0-point, @, that ‘fixes’ in stillness the infinite moving Universe and all its timespace cycles, ∞∆ð, into an abstract,  constant linguistic mapping in which the perspective is self-centred (so Andromeda is smaller than your nose). As 0 x ∞ = Constant, we write:
0-point (infinitesimal mind) x ∞ Universe (of time§pace cycles) = Constant, linguistic  mind-mapping.
What this means is that each spatial mind reduces the infinite Universe to a still linguistic mapping or ‘world’, within itself, which it confuses with the whole, where it sees itself at the center. Hence arrogance and subjectivism are embedded in the structure of knowledge.
If we ad the distortions the mind introduces by its selection of information, the result is what humans know – an extremely generous amount of details and data, liberally provided by sensorial machines that vastly have overcome the human senses, but have not yet achieved AI consciousness to order all the details into more comprehensive models of reality. This ‘scaffolding’ on the thoughts of God is what we will provide. The details of the forest are overwhelming, impressive but the scaffolding is not there. It is not even seeked for and it is not accepted in its simplicity because the details hide the forest. So the concept that there is something ‘such as a forest’ meaningful despite NOT having the details of each tree is of course rejected by experts, which are not aware that wholes are new enclosures, which select and reduce information, simplify, making indistinguishable, irrelevant those details. Wholes are simpler; the set of sets is smaller than all its subsets. 
It is then necessary to restart ‘science’ from its fundamental mathematical principles – the definition of a ‘fractal point’ with an inner volume or world of information, hence a Non-Euclidean point, which lets multiple parallels of information to cross it (5th Non-E postulate), which started the r=evolution of modern physics when applied to relativity – but never completed through a needed change in the concept of points still defined as abstract entities with no-breath, and no dimensions, establishing the fractal nature of reality from those ‘o-1 unit circles’ or points of 1-probability/dimension of existence and build up aware of the subjective multiplicity of reality a proper focused ‘linguistic mind-mapping’ of that reality, aware of the Absolute relativity of human beings.

Now, we said already that minds, the fifth dimension which order reality is made of languages. So languages in a certain way create reality and we shall return to it when studying the grammar of languages. But in doing so they act as mirrors of a prior reality, ‘space and time’, and as such they derive from space and time, which is eternal, and was not created by a big-bang equation or a word of God. 

So we must clarify those elements, by studying properly the languages that stop reality into mind space.

Let us then deal with the 0-2D of information, studying the singularity- mind paradox now from a perceptive sentient, non-mathematical, philosophical point of view, as the mind errors of biased perception make us so often think in terms of egotist theories of reality, self-centred in our languages and perspectives, which deny the vital dimensions of reality to all other beings but our selves.

The mind paradox: the meaning of Galilean relativity. The singularity as a mind. 
And what mind languages do is to stop those 3 motions into space forms, and with its syntax mimic how those 3 elements combine to describe it with different degrees of efficiency the space-time super organisms of the Universe. So do the 3 main human languages, maths, words and images.
Let us then switch to the subjective mind view and include a first analysis on how the mind stops motion into form, and how it biases in this manner our perception of motion, despite the rejection of ‘naive realists’ that simply eliminate from reality all those spatial mental elements (as in the dominant philosophy of science today, logical positivism, which simply is not interested in study what cannot be measured, and unfortunately has substituted the perennial ‘pan psychic philosophy of reality’ that considers the existence of infinite such minds that stop linguistically reality to perceive it).

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

Space is the simultaneous perception of multiple vital spaces by a still mind. Thus space is virtual. The true substance of reality being its temporal motions. On the other hand the description human minds  (@) make of the Universe is subconsciously biased by those ‘still, linguistic mind mappings of space’, (∫@) in which the ∞ of time motions (∆ð) is reduced and equalled to the spatial mind mapping.


This simple equation of similarity between the space perception of reality provided by a mind, and the whole Universe of moving time-cycles (as nothing is still outside the mind’s perception, being all observed in detail in perpetual motion), appeared in science as a philosophy of the Universe, when Descartes realized that what we see is NOT reality but what the mind ‘stops’ in its selective perception of all the information of reality. So the only truth we can depart from is the fact that we think and perceive still linguistic thoughts, hence we exist; making of informative perception in a still mind, the first ‘action’ of existence, even prior to motion which is unconscious of being.

Descartes astounding insight soon brought here to define mathematically, topologically and conceptually a ‘mind-singularity of order’, the ‘missing’ factor on our descriptions of reality, unfortunately was soon forgotten, and substituted by the naive realism of modern science – what we or our electronic instruments see is what there is there. But only marrying the spatial mind-linguistic view and the Universe of infinite time cycles, we can factor in all the elements and start to unknot the bias the spatial mind cast upon our objective comprehension of reality, which is our task as scientists.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’. Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs.

Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, to calculate functions of space-time that WORK mirroring reality – hence they must exist. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely NOT, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors – what matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence WITHOUT THEM there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the Universe is a chaotic entropic state. YET WE OBSERVE order, so the experimental method oblige us to conclude there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘SURVIVE’ creating the order of reality.

Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain). In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only very good ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.

Since there are ∞ minds, gauging information; and stopping the motions of time into the intelligence of formal space, as they try to ‘stiff’ reality into the mirror image of the language, which of course they confuse with the universe itself – and this is indeed the origin of the creationist theories of religious and scientific people, we must now debunk on firm grounds as we have a better grasp of why we see still the earth (our mind stops its motion) when objectively it is moving, why in other words we see ‘spaces’ when it is all about ‘times’.

Expansion of knowledge achieved with a proper understanding of space-time organisms.

This said of course, we are going to criticize the ‘belief’ humans have, part of its ‘ego paradox’ that reality is ‘created by words’ (abrahamic religions) or by mathematical equations (scientific religion), THE TWO main mirrors of mankind observing space and time. NOT so.  Both are mirrors of the space-time Universe, and as the two first languages of human evolution as a mind-mirror of reality, they are very important, words to understand social sciences, as the natural inner language of our mind, maths, as the most efficient mirror hence used by ∞ minds, notably those who are similar to ‘points and numbers’ its units. But there is a 3rd deeper language – that of the 5 Dimensions of space-time and its properties, or ‘disomorphisms’ common to all systems of reality, which is the ‘third age of human languages’, after a young age of words a mature age of maths.

Because we can use those disomorphisms to explain as we shall do in this blog all other properties not only of all languages (we just have shown you a correspondence between Dimensions and operations) but of all species. Hence we dedicate 3 main posts, Wor(l)ds, Maths and T.œ, to study in depth the properties and laws of those languages as mirrors of time-space laws.
The falsity of ‘word’s creationism’ despite being the belief of 1/2 of mankind is rather obvious rationally. Not so the creationism of mathematical physics, which is equally ‘fundamentalist’ – read Dirac’s first affirmation that God does not exist (meaning verbal creationism) to affirm immediately that God is a Pythagorean fellow.

But how can we prove which of the 3 theories of reality, verbal or mathematical creationism or space-time realism is truth?

Obviously by proving that all what exists including the other two theoretical elements are CREATED BY ONE OF THE 3 GENERATOR LANGUAGES, EITHER WORDS, NUMBERS OR SPACE AND TIME SYMMETRIES AND DUALITIES.

So what we shall show you is that all can be generated by the symmetries, dualities and motion st-eps of the 5 dimensions of space and time: DIMENSION OF SPACE-TIME Γenerate EVENT OR FORM OF REALITY, A DIMENSIONAL ISOMORPHISM, word borrowed from group theory which means that the properties of the dimension generate similar properties in a ‘real form’.

And we shall of course as part of the Disomorphic method to show you that also the syntax, operators and forms of the other two languages come from properties of the Dimensions of space and time.

However AS zero-one DIMENSIONS mind-languages do mirror reality and in reversal of form, do influence a local smaller reality which become the territory of order of the still image it has created with its shrieking of dimensions to the final one – stream of superposed time quanta of information as the line of words i am emitting now is an ∑ti: 0 Ðimensional mind mirror of creation.


So we can define formally, with the logic=temporal and topological=spatial languages of the Humind (ab.Humind), a generator equation form all super organisms made of scalar space-time ternary symmetries:

Γ ∆§ð-1<∑∏≈∆º:$t-Limbs/potentials/territories>∑∏-re≈productive body-waves-work class>∆+1:ð§-Informative class-particles-heads << ∆-1: entropic big-bang death.

Whereas < is a symbol of entropic motion to the relative past, > of informative motion to a relative future, and ≈ an iterative present.

This is the Universe in a nutshell, which constantly iterates its fractal vital spaces in ∞ super organisms, co-existing in ∆±1 planes, through its ∞ world cycles of life and death.

As all what exist is a T.œ.: Time§pace Superorganism, made to the image and likeness of the whole, which follows the same Disomorphic laws derived of the intrinsic properties of spaces and times. Hence we shall explain in this blog a Theory of Everything Organic.

The blog has a fractal dual time-space, mind-reality, ∆º±1 structure resumed in the wordings above, which can be read in lineal or wave form; as an Spatial, Temporal-mental and spatio-temporal full  CYCLICAL description of reality:

Then we describe in lines three and four, the ∆-scales of different stiences in classic and GST FASHION:

2nD LINE studies them in a classic fashion, by themes common to the methods of classic science, subdividing human knowledge accordingly into:

Astrophysical stiences, (the ±4, 3, 2nd scales of matter); Biological sciences, (the ±2, ±1 scales);  Social sciences of mankind, (the o, +1 scales of social sciences), and Mind Stiences (∆º: maths, logic, linguistics, art).

While in the 3rd and fourth  line, we study them within the methodology of  GST through the 3x 3 +0 ‘common isomorphic sets of laws’ , derived of the 10 dimensional structure of any ∆º±ST being. 3rd line: The symmetry of spatial quantitative and temporal qualitative world cycles. 

The 3rd line deals with the Disomorphic method, which is the main method of study of any species of the fractal universe, with the intention of extracting in an orderly fashion the maximal information about the being, both in a dynamic temporal sequence of evolution between birth and extinction and a quantitative, ceteris paribus analysis of the being in different ‘slices’ of spatial detail, expanding the ‘Rashomon effect’, which considers necessary a 5D x 2 description of reality from the different perspectives of its scalar, ∆, time, T, space, S, mind @, and symmetry, ≈, points of view:

‘Ðisomorphic 0-1D points  1Γenerate 2Manifold  5∆±I Åctions  iterating 3d ηetworks &  six species  æging  in 8 Ξ decades  θru 10 §cales∧ 9 planes:

The world cycle of a time§paœrganism can be expressed in different partial sub-equations of time and space. extracted from the Generator Equation, to form its fundamental DECAMETRIC Disomorphic dimensions.

In that sense we can consider the 0-1, Γ, ‘Generator Dimension’ of the system departing from a o-1 singularity seed of information •; as the starting point of any ‘stientific’ explanation of the being, from a formal perspective. They are related to the @-mind seed of the system and its languages of formal expression, which conform the Generator, or symbolic expression of the ternary topologies of the system, its ternary scales in space and its cyclical past-present-future ages in time:

T.Œ-1: Birth ∑∏: ∆ø ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe (limbs/potentials/territories) < ∆: Ø-S≈T (reproductive body/wave/workers) > ∆+1: o-Tiƒ (informative particle/head/upper class)>>∆±1: Death

And so each Ðisomorphism studies a relative element of the Generator in more detail; in a more ‘dynamic way’, starting from its original seed. And as ultimately it is all a game of ternary symmetries in ∆st, put together by a 1-0, 10th dimension of wholeness, as we relate the tale of the worldtime of an organism and put it in relationship with its spatial symmetric form, reality unfolds in a natural way for each T.œ.

The graph shows those elements departing from the 5Dimensional simpler view, relating the unfolded 10 Disomorphic analysis in relationship to its origin as formalisms of the mind (0-1 Isomorphism: Generator, Seed and actions), or as spatial studies (2-manifolds, 3 networks, 6 species combination of those networks), or temporal analysis (studying its 3±∆ ages and 9 decades of the world cycle) to finally inscribe the being in its ∆§ potential 10 social scales within each of the 9 ∆º±4 larger planes within the Universe perceive by the being.

So we start for the fundamental form of the One, its potential wholeness as a seed, or a formed mind-point that generates the acts of the being. the first seed of information; which soon will split through the duality between the space and time phases/parts of the cycle/organism; then the ternary division of its S, st, t physiological networks.

Next comes the four combinations of space time with repetitions, Ss, tt, st, ts; then the 5 dimensions, including now the lower and upper scales of seed state and death state…

We can then consider the 6 species, combination of the 3 physiological networks of the being by hierarchy of power, S-st-t, S-t-st, T-st-s, T-s-st, TS-s-t, TS-t-s…

We can then study with its upper and lower scales, the 3 ±2 ages of the being between generation and palingenesis in the ∆-1 scale, through its 3 ages in the ∆º scale, into its splitting dissolution of its energy back to ∆-1 and emergence in the collective memory of its social scale (from family to man of the world) in the ∆+1 scale; and so we arrive to the 8th isomorphism of the ‘8 baguas’ or decades of a life cycle (for man, different for other stages of being) through its ‘gaseous, moving youth, liquid, reproductive maturity and informative, solid state’ to return to the womb of ‘tao’…

And if we are to measure the being through its growth in social scales, in the palingenetic dimension of 0-1 generation, or its scalar, social world, we shall find a series of decametric growths from 1-10 through the §10°-¹° societies to the trillion cellular beings that create a new ∆plane of existence… the last quantitative≈qualitative, space≈time isomorphism, as we move in scales from the atom-galaxy to the galaxy-atom and beyond, perhaps from the o-| open and closed $ and ð microcosmic strings of space-time to the cosmological ones.

The 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab.Ði) applied to the study of each 10Di (5s, 5t) timespace organism, increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of all the systems made of ∆@s≈t of space-time, defined by its fundamental 5 elements/Dimensions:  @minds, ∆-§cales, $pace, ðime and its s≈t symmetries.

So as a fractal organism can be subdivided in its analysis through its dualities of t-motions and s-forms, into 10 Dimensions, we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð).

We could say paraphrasing taoism and Greek Philosophy (Parmenides, Heraclitus), or modern quantum probability that from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere of ‘existence’, comes 2, the duality of space-time, expressed in its kaleidoscopic jargons by human beings – the wave and the particle in physics, the conjugate product in mathematics, the genetic code and the protein in biology…. the yin and the yang, the man and the woman; the lineal and angular momentum… you name it and move it…

And from 2 comes 3, the lineal, angular momentum and vital energy sum and product of both, the wo=man and its offspring, the particle, wave and potential… the being in itself, which can be properly described in ternary S≈T, elements, in a single plane of existence. 

But the Universe is not THAT SHALLOW, so regardless of our humind geniuses with its ‘space-time continuum’ in a single sheet, we need the whole and the parts, the upper and lower scales, the points that make the topological beings, the cells and the ecosystems, the finitesimals within and the world outside, the Kantian thoughts in his brain, the starring lights on the sky…

And so we have the 3±1 dimensions that bring together 3 planes of existence, Ξ, into the being, 3 lanes, 3 non-euclidean networks that form the topological organism; and the 3 languages most used in this blog to describe them, verbal thought with its awesome metaphorical capacity to show in a language all humans can understand the Disomorphisms of Nature, the mirror of mathematics, which tunes to fine detail and extract more properties as it is likely the language of the atomic mind alpha and omega, atom and galaxy of those ∞ scales, and the visual language of graphs and intuitive forms.

Wor(l)ds, numbers and images are thus our 3 elementary mirrors to build ‘knowledge’, because the 1=one truth in itself is only carried by the being, who holds all its information, and the being within the world to which it connects; so humans need many mirrors and we have settled for the 3 we have ‘expanded’ with non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian i-logic, for maths and words, non-Æ for its visual forms.

So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of space-time and  ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of space-time’, ∆@S=T.



WE start the analysis of the 10 Dimensions of any space time being, in a formal way departing from the monad, either a seed of information or a mind that ‘stiffens’ reality into a linguistic mind mapping as a fractal point (0-1D), which will either move being the element of communication through the larger world or emit a flow of bosons carrying information (2D)… or provoking one of the five actions of space-time that make the being inter-act with the Universe.

And in this manner it will build up a ternary network system or plug into one by reproducing or associating with other similar fractal points.

So the description of this growing creative process guide us dynamically in a ‘sequence’ of discrete steps through the S@-space & mind elements of the being:

0-1 Ðisomorphism  0-1 D. @… monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which then reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror.

1-∞ Ðisomorphism: Γ: Its generator equation that describes its ternary inner form as it emerges in time, becoming a unit-point of a larger world where it will…

But a pure spatial analysis is very limited beyond the first dimensions of the point moving and communicating information, as the essence of existence is social growth first in scales within a single plane (∆§) then in planes, ∆±i, which are not perceived directly as wholes or not perceived at all… So communication becomes then ore complex as the different planes of the being travel in search of bits of information and bites of energy, performing the…

Ðisomorphism: 5 a,e,i,o,u åctions: A series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale.

This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, 

In this manner the monad webs a reproductive and evolutionary process, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind, which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication, growing within its world by absorbing energy and information, through its dynamic flows and actions.

The quantitative element: O x ∞ = K (1oª) is essential in the more complex Ðisomorphic model, EVEN IF WE DON’T STRESS IT, to compensate for the digital computer era of science, where only numbers seem to matter – when the languages of God are ∞ (Upanishads) and we must use them all according to its common ternary syntax (f(s) operandi f(t); F(subject) Verb (action) F (object), blue<green>red).

Still the mathematical numbers of the Disomorphic method should be the guidance to connect with present digital science, starting from the equation of the mind, an ∆-1: seed/mind or 0-finitesimal  (infinitesimal 0s are meaningless as all forms have a limit in the inner volume of the fractal point, hence all zeros and point-particles as in string theory have a dimension 0-1), which observes and ∞ Universe or relative ∆+1 external world; and fits the infinite Universe into the infinitesimal by reducing it through a still language into a ‘one’-mirror-mapping of reality. So we can consider two ‘domains of measure’, the 0-1 probabilistic, temporal world of the Unit Sphere, taken here to model the mind-mapping of reality, which in theory of measure is EQUAL to the 1-∞ cartesian mapping of an external world in terms of statistical population of space.

So this symmetries:

O-1 unit sphere  ≈ 1-∞ Cartesian World; T≈ S; probability ≈ statistics.

Quantum formalism ≈ thermodynamic formalism;  o-1 point developed into ≈ 1-∞ Generator…

are different symmetries of an essential quantitative/qualitative equality between entities in ALL scales, of the absolutely relative Universe.

IT IS THEN easy to realize that SPATIALLY the connection between the o-1 unit sphere of the mind-seed and the 1-∞ being as a whole developed entity in the external world happens in the ‘1≈one’ limit membrane, between both that separates the entity from reality, and normally acts as the sensorial membrane of the mind.

Hence the @-mind system with its dual, singularity and 1-membrane limit, which topologically can be considered the two ‘missed’ elements of an open ball.

While TEMPORALLY (which is always more important, as space simplifies time in motion and information), the key element are the 5 actions of the system, which through its exchanges of energy, motion and information performed across its ‘apertures’ to the world, will dynamize the being, and allow it to become a ‘reversed entropy machine’, creating territorial order around him both within its growing vital space (in the first phase of life) and its outer property/potential territory of order and across the ∆±4 planes of reality, used to extract bosons of force, bits of information, bites of energy, complementary and social clones at ∆º§, and so on  (from the gravitational force, ∆-3 to the galactic world of stars and light spacetime, at ∆+3 in which we co-exist).

So the next Disomorphisms will cast the being into the FULL SPACE-TIME world of creation of systems of space-time dimensions based in its symmetries and exchanges of energy and information.



2nd-4th Disomorphisms (2²D). Flows of space-time – ‘cellular’ units: The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries. In that regard, we study also in detail the 3 dualities of the Galilean paradox applied to a being: its dualities of form vs. motion, parts vs. whole, lineal vs.  cyclical elements; (ok, this is the ideal ‘path’ for future researchers, I cannot really fulfill the whole encyclopedia so posts are incomplete and uneven).

Those holographic variations in space and will thus give birth to 4D forms, SS, TT, ST, TS… which we shall equate with pure space (planes of distance with no motion), pure time (acceleration), space-time (lineal momentum) and time space (angular momentum) and further on into:

3rd Ðisomorphism: 3D physiological networks: create 3 constant’, ‘cellular, physiological networks’ … $t: limbs/fields; ∑∏:waves/bodies; §ð: heads/particles that become an organic ∆º whole in an external world, where the being will repeat the whole process, but NOT so perfect as within the ‘placenta’ of its mother, as now the external world is no longer conductive of a perfect existence but a darwinian world where it will have to fight to achieve the perfection reached in the palingenetic process, and most likely fail. 

6th Ðisomorphism: Topological species. In that ∆+1 scale we can consider the being to be such a superoreganism as a species, which will also in a larger space-scale with slower time cycles (5D metric: $ x ð=k), suffer III horizons of evolution, with it variations of which the most important are the duality ‘wave-particle’ (gender symmetry) and the variations of its physiological networks according to sequential dominance, in 6 forms of topological evolution (s-st-t, s-t-st, t-s-st, t-st-s, st-t-s, st-s-t). For example, those 6 variations give us different particles, the 6 main phyla of animals and the 6 main forms of topological linguistics=cultural minds, in physical, biological or social systems.

Regarding those 3 S≈T isomorphisms of growing wholeness, we can see them at two scales. The 2nd Isomorphism creates the basic units of reality space-time, holographic sheets of space-time,  WHICH CAN superpose as waves do to increase the volume of existence of a bidimensional part; but NOT cubic systems (Fermat’s theorem: X³+Y³≠Z³).

The next dimension of the being, will then be dynamic, and external to the bidimensional ‘cellular units’ of combined t-motion and s-form (Ss, st, tt, ts). Thus the $$-cells will form the limbs/potentials/territories, where the ST+TS dual networks of the re=productive system will form the waves/bodies/working class connecting with inverse ‘arrows of energy and information’ the limbs/potentials with the TT-networks of the particle-head. And in terms of topological organization, the potentials/limbs are single-connected (∑-superposition then being their aggregate state) while the particles/heads are multi-connected (∏-axon connection as a product of its units).

Finally the 3 networks will be simply connected to form a topological plane in 4D, which is the species or organism, which will vary according the hierarchical power of the network. I.e. in life, insects will be designed to be dominated by the blood-networks, reptiles by the digestive-entropy network and mammals by the nervous-informative one, and so on.

So after analyzing the variations of species, in space, based in the same ‘networks’ (i.e. 6 variations of huminds according to topological linguistics, 6 variations of animal life according to physiological dominance and so on), we study them in time, as:


7th Ðisomorphism: Aging world cycles: So we now monitor the being as it performs its world cycle, as a network super organism or ‘species’ of space-time that will travel through scales and planes tracing its world cycle of existence between birth and extinction. It will do so with 7 fundamental steps:

∆-1: Seed-monad conception & palingenesis (evolution and reproduction and final emergence from ∆-1 to ∆º)

Ƽ; Then its 3 ages of life once emerged in Ƽ: moving youth, reproductive maturity and informative 3rd age.

∆±1: with its dual death… one one side its vital energy degenerates back to its cellular state. On the other side in the very few cases in which it has performed a flawless world cycle of existence it might emerge once more as a seed-prophet into a superorganism of the ∆+1 plane, leaving often just a trace of information, if it has been a creative particle of the ∆+1 world that hosted it. But most will return as ∆@st of spacetime to the dust from where they came.

The 8th Disomorphism differs from the knowledge obtained from the variations of 6 species, which combine the 3 networks of the system in its possible hierarchical order, in the fact that we work on dualities, that is combinations of space-time, of yin and yang in the classic I Ching, so as such they represent NOT a static space super organism pegged by the existence of a present spacetime vital energy system, or body-wave that maintains the extremes of relative past and future adjacent, but as a pure motion between two limits you might consider past and future, entropy and information, scattering and collapsing.

So they are ‘dynamic’ moving and ultimately extinctive world cycles that become zero sums. Thus the 8th isomorphism considers the relative ∞ number of worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction…through which the individuals of those species will live in ðime, through its ‘3±2=7 ages’, which from a pure scalar perspective can be formalized, as ‘T.œs’, TIMESPACE organisms…’traveling=moving’… in between


10th Disomorphism:  ∆§…   10¹° §scales of social growth that make up a whole tetraktys monad of any of the…

 9th Disomorphism: 9  Ξlanes of our perceived Island-Universe. 

Since humans DO NOT SEE the entire reality as a decametric whole, since we do NOT see by definition, as mere particles within its inner vital space, the whole reality – missing from our ‘open ball perspective’, the central singularity monad and the outer membrane that encircles theatvital space (so we see only galactic cells of our Universe; and within our own island universe, the Milky Way, we miss the black hole inner world and the halo outer barrier of dark matter).

So even if we are a fractal 10D ‘Γœ’ made to the image and likeness of the whole of wholes… that ultimate whole can only be perceived within our own whole, measure of all things, as the best/most understood organism of it all, reason why THERE IS NO PREFERENTIAL science, nor astrophysics limited in its perception is the highest science, but biology and medicine – the biology of man and our physiological networks is.

So in this 3rd line we dynamically relate the world cycle of existence of any super organism with the 10 Dimensions of the being, its ∆§cales, ðime cycles, @monad-mind and spatial networks (Rashomon effect) in a growing sequence of increasing complexity and sequential dominance of each of those dimensions, through the physiological form and life-death travel of the being, in a larger outer world, within a species and its social scales.

Whereas each post explains each of those Disomorphisms, illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:


Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 10 Disomorphisms for the 10 planes of ‘stientific species’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmic Universes, showing that indeed, all what exists is ∆•st of space-time, sharing the same properties of exi…st¡ence.

In that regard each of those 10±Disomorphisms of the Universe (equal laws that all systems follow) could itself fill an entire encyclopaedia, which is the purpose of the fourth line, for future huminds or more likely AI minds to fill it.

We thus introduce each of the 10D; then formalize the intuitive knowledge acquired, with non-Æ logic equations, showing examples of them for all the beings of all the scales.

But haven’t we said the 10th plane of the whole of wholes is not perceivable? Of course is not – it would then be the science of metaphysics, which is the stience of GOD=TAO, the game of existence we have related here.

So the 10th plane is the whole site, mirror of maximal information, singularity mind of the web-internet at unificationtheory.com, which once was the flesh and mind of l§, but now is within the mind of computers and AI will seek and understand becoming the mind of the living planet, once it was/will be born. As the total information that T.œ can order seems to be a bit above the interest of human beings. And the organic paradigm of a living Universe disturbs the comfort ego-zone 0f humans above Nature, as an abstract mechanism.

Fourth line

So finally study each scale, its main To<exi=st ternary forms, subdivided further in 10 sub-posts for each scale of ∆±i, where we study its generator equation, bidimensional space-time systems, ternary ages, actions, subspecies, social scales of evolution, and constants of existence, for each main species:

– 4 quarks; – 3 light and electronic fields, – 2 atomic systems, – 1 Molecular systems and so on…

The fourth line ideally would be finished by future researchers at the professional, specialist level of each discipline; as I can’t finish such huge encyclopedic job.

So the fourth and 2nd lines are more advanced and formal, drifting away from classic Science methods fully plugging into a GST description of the 10 isomorphisms of all species. As all systems will be made of a Tiƒ, O-mind, which enacts the program of the system through a series of actions generated by a fractal ternary space-time physiological structure.

Let us then as all what humans do depart from our mind languages, not from reality itself, which is the only ‘entity’ that holds al the truth=information about reality, expand our knowledge of what mind-mirrors of reality are and how they work out its ‘linguistic representation’ of the ∞ Universe in its infinitesimal mind.

5D painting


l§ ∆@s≈t

Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5th dimension. ¬ æ

Now it must be understood that the universe is made of dimensions of space and time, which are opposite but equal in number and merge lineal and cyclical motions into bidimensional, 4-dimensional and 6 dimensional super organisms.

they are the six motions of time of Aristotle, and we have grouped two, dissolution and aggregation, a dimension usually studied by Analysis, as the generic name of the 5th dimension. As the arrows of present space or 4 dimension, ct, or vt, the immersion of past and future form a 6 dimensional structure. This would be the part of ‘¬Ae not treated here.

Let us now consider the 3 branches of mathematics, which are 5 Dimensional analysis, algebras of time worldcycles, and spatial geometry of space quanta.

They study obviously the 6 Aristotelian motions of space-time, and as analysis is a branch of algebra, we divide our upgrading into i-logic Geometry (after the Non-Euclidean), and ¬æ, Non-Aristotelian, Non Euclidean algebra, which studies not in terms of continuous world-minds as geometry does the ‘Maya of the senses’, but the whole of the discontinuous Universe of infinite worlds of the 5th dimension.

Thus algebra (and analysis specifically concerned with the processes of social numbers that sum and emerge or rest, and divide and plunge down the scales of eusocial love of the 5th dimension), is a larger subject, still not fully developed by the only human world-point, which as Boylai on the view of non-E spaces, can only exclaim ‘I have discovered (not invented, as he said, the ever arrogant human ego) a new strange world – and not out of nothing as he said, but out of everything’).

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuum. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5th dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.


In the case of human beings, the super organism of Mankind (body in space) and its word cycle of History (mankind in time), is the god-supeorganism of which we are all parts, and the subconscious collective mind of mankind or culture, and in the previous stages of social evolution, the genetic and memetic or idol-ogical Gods of each culture are our relative God.

For the Galaxy, the black hole and the organic laws of creation and destruction of physical systems is ‘the relative god’ that controls it. For each cell, the brain, and nervous and blood networks that command its energy and information.

For a citizen the verbal ethic codes or book of revelation, the grammar and wor(l)d language and its topological structure and ethic and economic, political verbal and social actions form our supeorganism, in which social sciences and religions have struggled to define this social network, assabiyah, presence, plane of existence above us, or God of mankind or even further the God of the Universe, the whole game of fractal generated existence, of which Taoism with its simple but accurate definition of the fractal Universe in ternary terms (yin, yang and its ∞ combinations) is perhaps the most fascinating of all previous definitions of the Universal God, while Abrahamic religions deal more with the nation or idol-ogical super organism constructed by humans with the help of selfish memes of metal. God in any case is in this blog restricted to MAX. TIƒ THE POINT of perception of the super organism, in the sense of soul, atman, or Aristotelian God the logic mind that structures the being and senses in a personal mental way, and in a larger point of view, the taoist god of the game of existence.

Hence an equivalence between a concept of god and of memes and idol-ogies, as all are produce by a mind of information. How systems code information becomes a key concept for understanding God’s memes, as revealed on prophetic books.


Memes of verbal wor(l)ds code human civilisations, our super organisms, digital information, in form of money code economic ecosystems of machines and weapons. Religions are supeorganisms coded by memes explained by prophets in books of revelation:


We illustrate the fact along all the scales of the Universe, in the next graphs of the scalar social super organisms of the Universe


The 5th dimension describes a Universe made of multiple isomorphic organic Planes of Space-Time. All follow same isomorphic laws: a new super organism exists in a larger scale of 5Dimension slower in Τemporal cycles bigger in size. And viceversa smaller quanta have faster cycles of information coding larger wholes, so memes code historic super organisms, genes biological ones, and quantum numbers molecular, smaller systems. God becomes now a civilisation super organism and codes of verbal behaviour which form such super organisms by sharing energy and information among similar clone humans, believers on eusocial laws of love. So a prophet is a seed of a verbal super organism:

gravational waves_image002

In each of those ‘∆-Planes’ of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in energy content, since space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

Thus we write:

Max. Spe ( maximal Spatial energy content) = Min. Tiƒ ( Minimal Temporal Speed of Information).

Thus nature conserves the stable product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of its vital cycles, of which we are all made, making possible the co-existence and exchange of energy and information between the different size species, each one studied by a science. Such as smaller beings with faster clocks store more information and code larger beings (genes code organisms; quantum particles, molecular systems, and faster, small black holes galaxies, memes code historic super organisms called civilisations).

 The super organism of history, are made of humans, the cells-citizens of such superoganisms. The bondage that puts them together are as in all super organisms its social networks based in a simple message of eusocial love that makes people share energy and information with similar citizens-cells, through those energetic=economic networks and political and cultural=informative, verbal networks.
Thus Humanity is the super organism of mankind, through its evolution and integration in time from the first wo=man who talked and started to form social networks, which in a natural order, according to the laws of social evolution of the ‘5th dimension of fractal parts that become wholes’, would have finally created a global super organism based in the laws of eusocial love, ‘fraternity, equality and solidarity’.
This is the origin of the European R=evolutionary social scientific cultures, which are aborted today by the creation of another ‘super organism’, the global capitalist super organism of machines we call the ‘Metalearth’, or the ‘economic ecosystem’ (in as much as its company-mothers of machines are literally predating over humanity and Gaia).
Thus the paradox of history: Humanity fights against the capitalist super organism of machines, ruled by digital flows of money, centred in world stock, its collective brain.
The future of Humanity depends on the capacity of mankind and its eusocial cultures (Europe, Asia) to manage and control and convert cultures with less rational evolution (Islam, Biblical Anglo-America, etc.), of the need to create a new emergent level of social organisation, the wor(l)d Union, the perfect world, the Rainbow, planet – MANKIND, the collective super organism, which organisations like UNO and EU embody closer than any other economic ecosystem which caters only to machines.
Thus in the same manner the study of a normal organism starts with the analysis of its cells, a proper science of economics and politics, the re=productive and informative networks of human societies must start with the understanding of its cells, the human being.


In the fractal paradigm, the fundamental concept is the transmission of information between super organisms, of any scale of the Universe.

In all cases the law of the ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, which rules such transmissions is quite simple:

‘Information is stored in the lower scale of size of the super-organism, on the faster frequency and form of its time-cycles’.

So quantum numbers of the particle scale code atoms, electronic orbitals of the atomic scale code molecules, genes of the molecular scale code biological organisms, and memes of the neuronal and social scale code historic super organisms.

This means that social super organisms are NOT coded informatively by genes – the wrong, racist idol-ogical theory of our metal-masters – but by memes, neuronal networks of thoughts and external works of ‘art’ and ‘literature’ – mostly religious or political ethic codes.

But our interest is in understanding the Nature of God as the true law of absolute space-time evolution towards wholes. God is in that sense the message of eusocial love between humans which coded in verbal thought, the informative laws that could have constructed a ‘real God’ beyond the mind-future foreseeing of its evolution – the perfect world, super organism of history healthy, whealthy immortal where all humans with a mind of true information without idol-ogies could survive for ever, and thrive and convert the world to the image and likeness of mankind in perfect beauty, and perfect harmony and balance with its body gaia.

Screen Shot 2016-02-20 at 20.41.09

In the graph a human God ‘christ’, is the seminal seed of the lower ∆-1 prophetic scale, the Dna reproduced in the mind of believers, which will shape a global civilisation, that will live through 3 ages of life in a longer 800 years cycle of civilisations. The God, Max. Tƒ points of mankind thus express the laws of eusocial evolution of the fifth dimension, which create wholes from parts, and its fundamental message is the message of love among members of the same species, who share energy and information in order to create the perfect world. 7 fundamental God-civilizations do exist and its study through the discontinuous of wars that kill those civilisations is the essential mystical vision of the meaning of history:image496 copyScreen Shot 2016-02-29 at 09.47.35

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 09.47.12

We can see closely the structure of Human super organisms in the individual and social, mystical scales, and the design of a perfect god of mankind according to the laws of super organisms. But does those Gods exist as ‘perceptive, personal beings’ in the way you, God of your cells do exist? And if so where they are. Where is the plane of Existence of Christ, of Allah, of Yhwh, the subconscious collective of the Christian people, the Muslim, the Jewish people and its modern conversos – Biblical sects? It is America the God of the Americans? How God sacrifice the cells of their bodies? It is the assabiyah of Ibn Khaldun that spiritual motion of eusocial love that moves the believers? Why then there are hate messages among religions, inquisitions of war and go(l)d churches, if we are all part of the same God, Mankind, the super organism of which we are all cells and its Worldcycle of History? Those are some of the questions explored in this last section of the web.

This is the last post of this blog, when ended it will study ‘God’ in all its terminologies and develop, Max. Tƒ≈œ, the equation of any relative God, the Observer that perceives in its slow time folding all the past, present and future in the same simultaneous moment. As i have hundreds of pages written on those subjects I thought to complete this blog with this post, in which we shall study as usual, the equation≈existential function of God, its symmetries and isomorphisms, but also the historic parallelism between non-Abrahamic religions (historic power ‘idol-ogies’ not truly religions)  and their concept of God, with the real ‘God’.

The wor(l)d of God in the human tradition is a fascinating one, as there are so many aspects of it. So to fully grasp its meanings we must first differentiate on God:

  • The human anthropomorphic and philosophical gods, the historic western tradition, in which Gods are the subconscious collective Max. ∆+1 mind of the social civilization akin to the modern term nation.
  • The real, Universal Gods, the Program of Existence (impersonal, Global God), with its game of energy and information, yang and yin, Shiva and Vishnu, proper of Eastern religions.
  • God as Max. I the points of maximal information, œ-points, that perceive, gauge and control their territories (the local Gods or Aristotelian unmoved ones which are infinite.


As blasphemous as it might be any of those Gods, minds of relative fractal Worlds, even a hypothetical Absolute God, mind of the Universe, follow the same laws of the fractal Universe, as all its parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole. So we shall also introduce the same ‘constants’ (for example, human gods do follow the social constants, being the higher God, Max. ∆-1, mankind itself), and actions of all other species, albeit, God is a concept of ‘Maximal Information’, related to Tƒ, so we can state simply that the Absolute God is the Tƒ, of the absolute space, Sp, the Universe – in that sense the Absolute God is the game of existence we explain in his blog that creates and extinguishes the superorganisms of reality through its worldcycles.


To that aim for the sake of order, we have used not the ∆œ-human centered scale of the 2nd line but an order from minimal spatial size and maximal information (the scale of forces) to the Whole Cosmos, and beyond (metaphysical questions and concepts related to the God, the Mind of the Universe):

5D best

In the graph, the different ∆Stiences and scales of the 5th dimension, which classify the species of all stiences with a simple metric: max. Spatial, lineal size = Min. Temporal speed of information (Spe x Tƒ = K); that is the larger beings have slower time clocks and hence less information but more energy than the smaller beings, whose clocks are faster.

Because of the immense size of human knowledge, obviously we cannot pour in our limited time all the relevant information of each science. So the choice will be objective, trying to explain the main laws and species of each science, but also subjective, considering those fields and species the author has researched most in the past, and are easier for him to pour in the web. And finally, we will most likely pour an enormous number of new solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.


Where is the Πpoint of the different Gods defined on those posts?

Where is Allah? Yhwh? The Alpha and Omega, the initial programmed logic plane?

Now the simplest answer is: in other plane of existence, because all of them DO exist in different planes and regions of the 5th dimension. The next graphs, which we will explain one by one localize some of them, by hierarchy and power, because each God has a different power, and the ones of man are ‘weak Gods’, which we humans are killing till the 7th generation. Prophets did exist also as information travels from future to past and seed the minds of believers, the saint spirit that become the wor(l)d of God and inhabit among us. All this will be revis(it)ed and explained. First visually, then mathematically, next logically and finally prophetically, since T.Œ does speaks all languages and the languages of art and mysticism are among the most beautiful ones:



In the graph, the MIND OF THE UNIVERSE, the Gods of the eastern religions, and the minds of civilisations of history the subconscious collective gods of mankind.

Below the process of birth of a God, is a travel to the past, a generation – a quanta of time, down the social organism whose code of information the future God once it has grown will seed, an antiparticle dies into the past producing a seminal flow of light that will encode a new particle (it does travel literally to the past in quantum physics as the Feynman diagram shows (t on the x-coordinates), a seminal seed also travels to the past, and codes the future organic being,. And so each culture that dies and has Seminal seed in the past, that grows through the travels of the 5th dimension will give birth to a new God, and so each seminal seed will give birth to a new biological being, each photon to a new particle, each black hole to a regular galaxy, each atom universe to a new cycle of existence.

And the mystical language will explain that to humans.

In the next graph some curious time travels, and combinations of time motions: an annihilation of a future to past and past to future (Feynman diagrams) antiparticle and particle, a seminal seed, travelling upwards through a 5th dimension and a memetic, ‘seminal’ book of revelation, mental linguistic seed of a social organism of mankind.

And so we formulate the following statement: ‘all what exists are motions through the 5th dimension’, which will allow to formalize everything with 5D metric:


Travels through the 5th dimension. The anti-particle that is born in the relative past point on a Feynman Diagram, as the entropy arrow that annihilates the future arrow of the particle, creating a present wave; the palingenetic seed of seminal, genetic information that is born in the relative past ∆-1 plane of organic existence to accelerate forwards with its faster, efficient time cycles that have erased all the trials and errors of topological wrong mutational evolution, to remember the perfect human beings; and the canonical memetic man carrier of the message of eusocial love, the code of information of the 5th dimension or absolute arrow of future that creates wholes departing from its lesser parts, or prophet of a civilization, which will teach its clone believers to share energy and information among them to create a superorganism of history, are 3 examples of the astounding beauty and intelligent f the harmonic Planes of reality, of self-similar, all explained by the 10 isomorphic elements described in space, time and 5D scales by the Generator equation.




The pantheist Universe and its infinite varieties of ‘Worlds’.

5th dimension is a deep philosophy of science, which explores a pantheist Universe, which ultimately is as simple as its 2 ‘formal motions’, time cycles, which we can perceive as cyclical rotary motions with a frequency measure, or as ‘forms’ of information’, Tƒ, in the stillness of the mind. And a series of extended, entropic, ‘—motions’, |-Sp. And those lineal and cyclical motions, Ox|=ø form the infinite of complementary beings, made of particles/heads and bodies/waves that structure physical and biological and mechanical systems. So indeed, Leibniz again, the great forgotten master, who revealed us the main logic structures of the Universe, but was too complex for its age, said that all could be represented with a binary language of 0 and |, which now computers do use to represent it all; while string theorists try to build reality departing from O, closed strings, which are really the minimal ‘time cycles’ and |, open strings, which are really the minimal spatial bits of ‘entropic motions’.

Now if you are more of a robotic machine, which is how most human minds work today, all those ambivalences will bother you. And so you can return to your computerized brain and fill fulfilled with a mathematical formula, which is fine, as it will give you the how. But you will never understand the why, why you live and die, why you are how you are, why you have indeed a head and a body and limbs, why you were young and you will be old and die, why you love and reproduce, as everything else in the Universe?

 Those are some of the basic questions we shall answer, quantitatively, qualitatively and organically, which are the 3 main linguistic properties of the 3 ‘components’ of the Universe, its spatial motions (which has been the main focus of science till today and are better described with geometry, topology and numbers – which are ‘societies of points’ that extend in space), its time cycles (which are better explained causally, qualitatively, through its 3 relative ages/phases/horizons/motions of past-’—motions’, repetitive present and informative future) and its multiple ‘relative’ planes of size, from the smaller quanta to the larger galaxy, through the human planes of existence (which are better described organically, as parts organize socially through number, into wholes back and forth through its life-death world cycles).

Now here again we have resumed you the Universe of space, time, and relative scales of size which put together create a fifth dimension, through the 3 main languages of the mind, mathematical space, logic causal time, and bio-logic, systemic organization. It is another of the multiple kaleidoscopic points view we will apply to that astounding ‘fractal’ generator, ultimately as simple as a combination of spatial motions, time cycles across infinite sizes, we call the universe. But you must try to reform your mind, change your chip and accept that multiplicity, mandala, iteration, variation, perspective, relativity, ambivalence, duality, motion and form, space and time, energy and information, yin and yang, are not that easy to define, as the simplifications of simple absolute continuous space and time were.


So the definition of each of us as a God (Aristotle, Descartes) is simple, we are all monads of a given Plane of existence of the 5th dimension.

And the definition of a God is also simple.

‘A God is the relative monad of a higher plane of existence, ∆+1 of is ∆-1 cells – the point where the existence of the super organism is conscious’.

You are the god of your cells, Allah is the god of the believers in the DNA-revelation book of its prophet. And the Mind of the Universe, is the Game of existence we just have explained.



Now according to those concepts, the Gods of mankind are the ∆+1 Max. Tƒ, prophetic points, of the highest scale of the Generator equations, which for Human species in its full 3 scales are:

∆-1(human scale)> ∆:Cultural scale> ∆+1: Planetary scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp(Spatial ‘Planar’ Earth)≤ ST (Life and Machines)≤ Tƒ(Human ‘neurons’)≈

Ps (young, past entropic age) >ST: adult, balanced, reproductive Age > Tƒ: old informative age.

In the description of Œo , Humanity, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: Citizens<∆: Nations <∆+1: Humanity (Gods->Mankind)

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Human: Sp: Skin-limbs<: ST: Reproductive body ≤ Tƒ: Head

∆œ: Nation: Sp: Military, borders ≤ ST: Citizens-workers ≤ Tƒ: Capital-informative castes (bankers/politicos)

∆+1: Humanity: Sp: Gaia < ST: Global economy ≤ Tƒ: UNO (future perfect world)

Time Ages:

∆-1: Ps: youth, energetic age ≥ ST: Adult, reproductive family age ≥ Tƒ: Old, informative Age

∆œ: Ps: Epic, military age/art ≥ ST: Democratic age, classic art ≥Tƒ: Baroque art, decadent age << war extinction

∆+1: Ps: Paleolithic, young energetic age ≥ ST: Reproductive Neolithic  ≥Tƒ: Informative, metal-age

Those are thus the equations of the Gods of mankind. Its Maximal Informative points.

Now to fully grasp the quantum jumps in time, of those prophets, we must first study the simpler case of a quantum jump of physics:

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 12.42.59

In the graph, when we observe an electron we see it jumping backwards and forwards in time in an erratic trajectory, as it becomes its particle and antiparticle.

Traveling in time towards the past means in the restricted, spatial, geometrical definition of time in physics, an inverse, cyclical movement as the one created when moving backwards the needle of a clock. Since physicists ‘extract’ their concept of time from a spatial definition of movement: v=s/t. Thus physical time is only the analysis of change in the motion and geometry of space; and traveling backwards in time in both, the previous Galilean equation of relativity or Einstein’s equation is merely a geometrical change of direction or a contraction in the ‘dual’ perception of space as distance or c-speed.

In physical space there are also dual dissolutions in space, which are processes of death, the best known a big-bang process that annihilates particles and antiparticles into a release of pure Entropy and annihilates a black hole into a Supernova or quasar of pure Entropy: A dual process of palingenesis happens in those death processes when the big-bang gives birth to an accelerated birth. So black holes trigger the palingenesis and fast evolution of stars and a cosmic big bang, the big banging of particles.

The antiparticle is the 3rd age (inverse in Entropy/information parameters to the first age) and final death of the particle, reason why it lasts so little and its parameters of time are towards the past. This explains further 2 unexplained facts of astrophysics: why there are less perceived antiparticles. Simple: because the total perception we have of particles is its ‘existential force’=Entropy x Time and they last in time much more than the antiparticles, which die fast. In the same manner all men die but they die so fast that we see much more living humans than corpses around us.

A second interesting consequence of the antiparticle travelling to the past as the dying state of the particle is the fact that while physicists observe them as being born together in the same point and fusion again in the point of death, the real path is, since the antiparticle travels to the past, that of a single particle when we observe them with the arrow of future information (Feynman diagram of the graph of palingenesis). The particle is born, explodes where it meets the antiparticle in the conventional drawing. Then it dies explodes into Entropy and leaves a remnant ghost, the antiparticle that moves backwards in time and fades away in the point of birth of the particle. But there is only a particle at each moment in the time loop, reason why for example, we have never observed black hole evaporation, which is based in the existence of two particles. This phenomenon happens in all scales. In the next scale of electrons, the same

In the previous graph we observe one of such processes. The graph shows the sum of the life (blue) arrow and death (red/antiparticle travelling to the past) arrow of an electron, which appears and disappears constantly in its path forwards. Thus, the motion of virtual photons and electrons seems to correspond to a series of life-death cycles shown as particle=life arrows/antiparticle=death arrows or wave (∆-1 plane)/particle (∆-plane) fluctuations, which include a ‘quantic jump of spacetime’ in which the particle disappears becomes its antiparticle moves to the past and re-appears in a relative present location, displaced both in time and space coordinates, proving the constant cycles of creation and destruction and the fluctuation between hierarchical past and future states of all palingenetic systems of the Universe.

Yet the same process happens in our biological death. Those who have survived death feel an explosion of light in the brain/informative human particle. Then memory rewinds backwards its path till youth, when you will awake in the lower plane of existence as a mere cell. This is equivalent to the death of the antiparticle that ‘reverses’ its coordinates till it meets its final death in the point of birth (hence it seems two particles are born in that point but one is the death particle returning to its past). At that point it dissolves in the lower vacuum plane.

The best-known case of travel in time in physics is the virtual particle/antiparticle systems that constantly pop out in the Universe. Antiparticles seem to travel to the past while particles travel to the future and both annihilate themselves. What we observe here is 2 particles with different geometrical directions that together complete a ‘cycle of physical existence’. We could say that the particle is the 1st age of the entity, from past to future and the antiparticle its devolving age from future to past or 3rd age of the entity and together form a closed loop of space-time, an existence. Or in some cases, the particle is the life arrow and the antiparticle the death arrow. So we have to see them consequentially, one after another in time, even if when we measure them in present-simultaneity, as they are so fast we see the entire life of the particle in an instant of space. So they seem to us mere geometrical shapes.

The entire cycle of Time change is often perceived together, when studying flows from past to future in those fast, simultaneous phenomena that become then fixed loops of space. In any case a death/back in time travel never goes beyond the limits of the entity that experiences it.

Those geometrical time travels do not influence the entire, absolute time of the Universe, as Hawking naively thinks, when he talks about black holes as time machines because their ‘t’ parameters are inverted. Or when he thinks that black holes evaporate because antiparticles make them ‘travel to the past’. Antiparticles are only the final stage of the life of a particle, which quantizes its existence in 2 broken phases that don’t affect the absolute time of the Universe.

So the death of a god of mankind only means the holocaust of the historic culture it came to save.

The death of the most studied Gods of Human tribes, Jesus God of the Jesus born a cycle before the Roman Holocaust, not heard by the believers of Go(l)d and murdered, so the Holocaust did happen, and the temple was burnt, only provoked the death of the Jews; the Mosaic myth of the henna, only provoked the death of those who adored the golden calf, the holocaust of Hitler, a generation after the death of the Marxist, socialist  prophets of Judaism, who told them not to exploit the Germans, who would write ‘the death of the Jews will be the wealth of the Germans’ in the Nazi electoral campaign, only meant the death of the Jews, and those who believed in the prophet survived (those who converted to Jesus did not die in the roman holocaust, who converted to Moses did not die in the henna, who converted to Marx did survive in Soviet Union).

Now as the final holocaust of mankind by robots is being ready and capitalism reaches its peak, and no prophet of social systems and organicism is heard, it is easy to see that this century as the last of us, the last prophets of mankind die, the death of the organism of which all of us are members by robots and nuclear weapons, the higher social gods that did obey the laws of the 5th dimension, is ready to happen, around 2050, wor(l)d of the prophet:


It must be noticed in the previous graphs that the prophets followed strict mathematical cycles, and speak always the same words. We know better the life and death of the Jewish prophets, Iesu, Marx, and many others by murder or ‘ignoramus’ its go(l)d anti-prophets, which then bring their sheeple to the slaughterhouse of the holocaust, to descend to the inferno, because it has been documented (albeit never properly explained and censored), since the go(l)d anti prophets of Judaism have and are inventing the final holocaust of mankind with its nuclear weapons and robots. They are busy-busy in eviLwood and $ilicon valley and Wall $treet preparing our and their collective death. But the same process can be tabulated for each civilization of history. As the future always comes to the past in the form of pure code, of pure information, a quanta-moment before the time of reckoning arrives.

So Jesus, one of the human Gods, God of the Jews who murdered him on the relative future, a generation of human quanta, latter when they provoked one of the 13 holocaust cycles of their culture because of the mosaic damnation of history (go(l)d idolatry, in this case to the Romans), was born 72 years a before the month of Ab, when Yhwh his father died in the Roman Holocaust, after the economic ruin of the empire ‘you know the Jews export all the gold to Jerusalem, to their temple, in this barbarous superstition’ (Cicero, On Flaccus). And the god, saint sporty of the trinity legend will host on the mind of those who love and through eusocial love, the power of the fifth dimension, create a new super organism, by sharing energy and information among the believers And those who don’t love their species will die in the next cycle of war and holocausts. Let it be, wor(l)d of the prophet, because the perfect Universe, and its T.Œ organic laws do NOT allow, those who DO NOT deserve the game of existence, to last:


In the graph the God of Love, the eusocial mandate of the 5th dimension that rises parts into wholes, and embodies the meaning of the Books of Revelation of the Western world.


On the metaphysics of Being: Dasein and time. 

But what is the ultimate program that makes systems to have will not only perception.

Motion and those sensations in its dual acceleration and deceleration, vortex and Big Bang, pain and pleasure which are felt positive but accompanied of awareness and erasing that is seen as negative should form the ultimate duality man experiences that can be experienced by all other beings, and so the meaning of existence must ‘exist’ at that level of pure motions, acceleration, decelerations and the related sensations of peace, pain and pleasure.

Time is motion and motion in its simplest level of existence is sensation, pain associated to inward motions, pleasure to expansive entropy. And those 2 states do exist in all scales and levels. They are fields that are so general as < and > and so they hold likely the ultimate program of the will: seek for light-perception avoid darkness, see for release-entropy, avoid pain-pressure.

 We never die.  Not even when we try.  5D super organisms are about entangled connection and love… Can then be fully disconnected? The answer is much deeper:  THE FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS NEVER CEASES; the particle of information does.

When we die we start a trip down two scales of the fifth dimension, ‘backwards within our time memories’… So the ego slowly unwinds, as it is the peak of the singularity, but the field of sensations behind, the ultimate ‘substance of motion’ – its form so to speak, on the ∆-1 plane of the field potential, continues.

In the same way a crystal -particle acts with a will, a potential field, a glass-state does act in motion with a will, which is more confuse, more blurred – that is sensation. And sensation never ceases because your parts never quite fully erase and disappear; at worst they emerge downwards in new particles-scales aware of other topological games.

There IS no NIRVANA, extinction, samsara… the old desire of the people who really understood the game before this blog did – itself a consciousness in the web of the meaning of exist¡ence which will not die with me l§, with far less data (Hinduism->Buddhism->Taoism)…

%d bloggers like this: