Home » ” @ct

” @ct

±∞∆•ST

SUMMARY: @

PART I – THE RASHOMON TRUTHS: MINDS FROM ITS 5D: S@≈∆ð PERSPECTIVES.

  1. • Mind§ingularities.
  2. Philosophy of the mind: Absolute relativity
  3. Non-Æ-minds as fractal points:The 0-1 Dimensional isomorphism

PART II. SPECIES OF MINDS.

  1. Monads in physical systems: singularities, vortices of future time.
  2. Monads in biological systems: genetics and nervous brains
  3. Monads in social systems: art the minds of civilisations, my mind knot of my culture.
  4. Economic minds: the homunculus animetal. world stock the mind of Metalearth


Foreword. 
The first line.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made…

  •   Asymmetries between its 4 Dual components, which can either annihilate or evolve, which we shall call Balance≈become symmetric or become Perpendicular/antysmmetric:
  • S: OF space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð:  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the first line of this blog:

widened for a more complex ‘Disomorphic analysis in the 3rd line, where we fully analyse the ‘more complete Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

Unfortunately the key element of those structures, the informative mind is NOT susceptible of direct analysis with machines – what humans consider the epitome of knowledge, to take pictures and measure with instruments the parameters of ‘evident’ reality. Yet regardless of the limits of perception of information of the ‘humind’, in philosophy of science without the mind nothing can be understood.

As it is through the languages of an åctive mind how the whole comes into being, and perceives those networks of ∆-1 cellular parts as a whole being, enacting simple aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, in order to maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being, achieved through two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals.

So to have a full description of maximal truth of the being, we require to study, the S-patial, S-calar, ð-emporal and @tive elements of a system, through its ternary symmetries,  achieved through the formalism of the Generator equation and its ternary Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, ¬Æ logic of 3±∆ Dimensional arrows of time space and Fractal Non-Euclidean points which enlarge in size and fit ∞ parallels when we travel through the 4th and 5th dimension of scalar parts and larger wholes, in which the being performs its world cycle, born of an ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves socially an emerges as an ∆º organism, living 3 ages in the outer world, to die back into an entropic explosion of 4Death completing a zero-sum of virtual existience, studied according to its relative size by different sciences, all of them following the same Disomorphic laws of space-time born of those 5D.

The degree of complexity and quantity of truth achieved in the description of a being thus requires to consider the different perspectives of its fundamental S@≈∆ð elements and we shall do so in this blog in 2 x 2 lines of increasing complexity.

In this manner the Rashomon effect offer us the maximal possible truth on the being outside itself (where all the truth or ‘1’ probability happens) by offering multiple perspectives of its elements maximized with different languages for each of those elements.

We study in this post and sub posts the MINDS OF ALL THE PLANES OF THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE.

5D TIME§PAŒRGANISMS MIRRORED BY SPATIAL LINGUISTIC MINDS

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself: •≈û’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fr@ctal •point=ûniverse of space-time.

‘The languages of god are infinite’ Upanishads

“@ Monad is a Mortal Mind Mapping Mirrored into reality”5Ðefinition of a mind l§

Foreword: M5: Mortal-Minds-Monads-Mappings-Mirrors

kaleidoMinds, Monads, Mortals, Mappings and Mirrors are the 5 M-words we shall use to explain the singularities that control the whole and perceive the super organism, enacting its actions of existence. Why those 5 words is simple: we constantly use the ‘ternary method’ or Rashomon effect, explaining reality from ∆@s=t 3±1 Dimensional perspectives to reach the maximal quantity of truth:

Truth=one for the being in itself that holds all its information.

Max. Mind truth = Multiple languages and perspectives cast upon the same being.

So this comes into effect with the Rashomon effect of reaching higher truths with at least dual, ternary or pentadimensional perspectives, as reality indeed moves from potential into reality precisely when the system plugs into all the dimensions and becomes useful within the complex structure of reality performing all its 5D actions:

Thus for the ‘fundamental concepts of reality’, we try to create the kaleidoscopic perspective of the Rashomon effect, which comes from the classic film in which 4 views are needed for a mind-mapping to have a fifth @-whole view. So the mind can be seen:

∆: -4D: as a mortal form, which tries to keep the Universe still but ultimately will be won by entropy and disorder returning its stillness to motion.

S: -5D: Internally as a Mind that stops reality into a whole and creates the image of a super organism, shrinking reality into its:

@:-1D: It can be seen as a Monad or singularity (better world but sorry doesn’t start with the M, Mass being other option, but as it is specific of the Gravitational ∆+1 scale better to use it there)… which is a Leibnizian infinitesimal whose density or mass of information will determine the quality of its:

≈: -3D: Linguistic Mapping of reality through its linguistic reproductive, inflationary system of kaleidoscopic sign-referential-semantic-metaphoric perception.

ð:-2D: And so we come to the motion of the mind, which is ITS CAPACITY TO MIRROR and move back reality and order it, making it grow around into a territorial super organism.

To notice that in all those dimensions there is an scalar fundamental Nature to Minds, which are thus the essential ∆+I>∆-I mode of shrinking reality without deformation (Poincare Conjeture) and for that reason have mostly an spherical form.

So the Rashomon effect gives us a much more profound multiple perspective of a mind, which ultimately can be resumed in a single symbol, @≈M5;

A Mind is a Monad that Mirrors reality, reflecting back its Linguistic Mapping into its Organic territory of order, trying to create a spatial, still form, till it dies and its in-form-ation dissolves: So it is the mind that constructs the spatial order and form of its super organism.

Why we choose then the word Mirror to encode all this is obvious: the mirror offers us the view of all the process; the world reflected back as an inverse image from the chaos of time cycles into the ordered image, its linguistic mapping, its stillness; its smallness as a monad, and specially the fundamental trick of an inversion of time-space in the mirror image, which means that what is disorder becomes order, what is first stored as information in the mind becomes then a seed of form that time will develop through the program of construction of super organisms. And finally because in this e-vident world mirror are easier to ‘grasp’ than minds and monads.

PART I

RASHOMON TRUTHS: S@≈∆ð

S

CREATION OF MENTAL SPACES OF INFORMATION

“@ monad is a mortal mind mapping mirrored into reality”

Knowledge is a process which departs from the humind; the mind is the perspective of man, an informative being, whose arrow of time is self-centred in its Tiƒ element. But the story is a bit more complex.

This program of creation, as we said can be seen as an external process, hence departing from the ‘external field of space-time in which the being exists’. And this which is the approach of physicists becomes an objective description or internal through the will of the being. Both are however tied by the complementarity between both; which means that the mind alone needs to understand the differences with the limb/field to become a complementary field-body-wave/head particle to be=come.

And so the philosophical question about the program of creation is this:

From the perspective of the mind, the mind causes reality, but from the perspective of the field, the field is its origin; and so we must readdress our idea of time arrows to include both perspectives. And fine tune the previous concept of the mind willing to survival as the time arrow we humans, mental beings see as the future: Tif>>Spe (human arrow). Yet from the point of view of the field; the singularity emerges from it and we shall then consider that if we were a field, we would see the singularity as our ‘creation’: Spe>>Tiƒ; and consider that process the arrow of future. 
And so the proper way to consider causality is to affirm that the relative S>t and T>s arrows form a feed back equation, S<≈>T of present, which becomes the defining process of symbiosis and complementarity of existence. This gives us three temporal descriptions which we observe in many sciences. I.e. in quantum physics there is mathematical description in which the field gives birth to the particle (quantum field theories) another in which there are multiple present paths between them (Feynman) and another in which the singularity creates the field (classic description of electrodynamic).

Yet for that reality to make sense, it implies  we need to adopt a single perspective, as the human mind is NOT multidimensional; and that is the approach we have taken after decades of working for my self playing with the three approaches simultaneously.

The concept behind this blog is rather simple. The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space-time, hence made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Such systems require 5 basic dimensions of space-time to make sense of it, 10 D if we separate each dimension of spatial topological form to its ‘view’ as time-motion (Galilean paradox of relativity of form and motion, which started modern science: e pur si muove, e pur no muove).

Those two new dimensions are ‘pure entropy’, the processes of death and dissolution of information down the scalar organic structure, which we shall call the fourth dimension of space-time, and its inverse, ‘pure information’, the ‘singularity and membranes’ that form the ‘mind-system’ of all Nature’s space-time organisms, by evolving socially and holding together in an external larger scalar world, the parts of the being. This is the fifth dimension of eusocial evolution, which orders reality and balances the fourth dimension of space-time entropy.

WITHOUT THEM there is NO WAY TO MAKE SENSE OF REALITY.

So in this post we shall develop a fundamental feature of the ‘humind membrain’, the sum of the dimensions of the surface senses of any space-time organism (in our case the nervous system) and its singularities=focus, which are LINGUISTIC MINDS that map out reality and reduce it to a still zero-motion ‘central vortex’ (in physical systems, or linguistic I=eye<wor(l)d of visual space and temporal verbs, in human beings).

THE MIND AND ITS LANGUAGES, which stop motion into form and order reality, as the singularity point and membrain of an open ball topology are THUS ESSENTIAL TO REALITY.

IT is a necessary ‘feature’ huminds with its naive realism and physical reductionism have thoroughly forgot. So we need to EVOLVE HUMAN VERBAL SYNTAX OF TIME-LOGIC AND Humind MATHEMATICAL-SPATIAL VIEW OF ITS TOPOLOGY and clarify the duality between minds ordering reality in ‘small T.œs, timespace supœrganisms’ and the Universe at large establishing the most general laws of that order from its ‘fractal space and cyclical time properties that limit what a mind-mirror and its language can do:

In the graph we can see the scales of stiences, its 3 time arrows observed as motions in the fifth, fourth inverse dimensions and the 3 relative present space-time dimensions used by normal science (albeit compressing the 3 dimensions of time into one). All this is good enough for the present purpose of science, to extract data, manipulate species and give us computerised models of reality in the detail, but we are concerned here with philosophy of science, of the whole and its first principles and for that we DO HAVE ONLY 2 LANGUAGES, MATHEMATICAL SPACE AND TEMPORAL LOGIC (numbers and words) to make sense of it, as those are the natural languages of our brains and the machines we use to observe the world.

So our mind-world is verbal=based in the ternary logic of the 3 past-present-future tenses, and visual=mathematical, based in the fractal structure of entities that seem points but grow in size as we observe them closer, holding ‘worlds in itself’ (Leibniz).

To proper describe the complexity of an organism, we just need 10 dimensions: 3 of time, past, present and future, 3 of space, its 3 bidimensional topologies or 3 standard ‘lineal dimensions, 3 of ‘∆±i-planes (with its decametric §cales of growth) as all beings co-exist in a larger world and are made of smaller parts, and finally the ‘membrain’ (monad or mind), which closes the ‘open ball’ of 9 dimensions, with its sensorial enclosure membrain that lets entropy, energy and information sip into the being, and its linguistic zero-sum singularity that maps the whole and commands its behaviour.

As such all super organisms of space-time follow the same laws, as they are made of the same substances.  And so we start by a dimensional, static analysis of the being and its 10 dimensions, provided by a simple ‘generator equation’ of each ‘T.œ”.

T.œ then becomes the briefest way to explain it all, as a Timespace œrganism, and also as the Theory of Everything organic, such as: T.œ= ∑t.œs. This is then the simplest conceptual definition of reality.

In the first line we shall explain the static and dynamic workings of all T.œs, in the second line, we shall refer each of the four main sub-disciplines of human thought, which analyse differently physical, biological social and mental=linguistic systems, as T.œs, and in the third line more complex, we shall study each of the main scalar T.œs of reality, with a detailed analysis of its 4 components: space topologies, time ages, organic scales and the @membrain; subdivided in 4 x 3 sub-elements, to fully describe them. It is the isomorphic method that applies 4 x 3 sub-elements of reality to the analysis in detail of all ‘stiences’, each study a range of T.œ according to scalar size.

And so such orderly methodology will show you the unity of all what exists.

The method of the first line is thus simple:

We study the existence of all ∆ºst beings of the Universe as super organisms tracing worldcycles, WITH EMPHASIS on the spatial view, of ‘simultaneous’ super organisms, made of fractal points joined in functional physiological networks of entropic, energetic and informative processing; which live to reproduce survive and make immortal the system in time:

” 10D    ¬Æ    ðime§paœ points    åct to Maximize its existence,  by reproducing  network supœrganisms  triping ωorldcycles of  st¡enœ:

So we first define each of the words of that sentence which resume dynamically in time (‘timespace arrows’ ‘worldcycles’), simultaneously in space (‘reproducing’, ‘supœrganisms’), ºmentally through formal languages (‘¬Æ’, ‘stience’, ‘Max. ∫exi∂st’) and organically through ∆-scales (‘5S+5t D’, ‘tripping’), the existence of all beings.

And then consider in more detail the element of the space-time being under the experimental method, by studying it in physical, biological and social systems.

The project is a ‘work in progress’, as i copy-paste or translate 30 years of research from old files, ordering, eliminating repetitions and adding experimental proofs… My apologies then for its poor form, which hopefully won’t obscure the essence.

In this post, AND SPECIALLY ITS SUBPOSTS purely formal, dedicated to the mathematical and logic structure of scalar space made of fractal points and ternary time, origin of the ternary logic of the Universe, we shall study those Non-euclidean, non-aristotelian upgrades of the formal languages of space and time of human beings, adding then examples of its application to all sciences.

The emergence of a seed of information from a lower scale of the Universe is prior to any motion, or else the motion seems to us invisible distance. As such the Universe always starts in a 1D Monad, or fractal non-Euclidean point able to shrink a Universe in its mind mirror as a still language, which becomes its logic engine of motions of time:

In the graph, the fractal point curves Universes into infinite simultaneous parallels that become a mind view, reducing through those electronic actions of density, the stillness of light into a mind-crystal image:

The development of the seed of information as it is in itself a specific combination of the possible states of multidimensionality S=T or minimal ‘action’ of a quanta world cycle, we might consider it to be æ in its logic structure, that is with a fixed sequential flow of time ages, that determines its fixed deterministic world cycle felt by the •-singularity as a growing social form:

In the graph, when we enter into the ∆º scale, the being has had an ∆-1>∆º emergence process from seed to full super organism, which is the densest age of information reproduction of the being, causing a ‘full relativistic’ growth from microscopic seed to full system. This first ∆-1>∆º scaling is well mimicked in the mathematical mirror with the 0-1 unit circle and its laws of probability, which establish a growth correspondence with its spatial superorganic evolution of populations in the 1-∞ scale:

In the graph, the transformation of the probabilistic unit circle in its expansion into a new dimension of space, creates the 2Dimension of motion, the first perceivable as it communicates motion and form between the unit circle outside the observer and the observable.

BUT the lineal time-motion or first dimension of classic physics IS NOT the origin of it all, but the mind that emerged from an ∆-1 scale or focuses the information down its singular, accelerated vortex IS the first ‘entity to exist’:

@-SINGULARITY’S WILL

COGITO ERGO SUM. ∞ mind-worlds

The mind has no magic about it. It is simply the focus of the sensorial information that transits the external cyclical membrane of the time-space organism, to stop in the centre. Hence the symbol @ we use for its two elements, the • mind proper, and the O membrain (as often the ‘exoderm’ element acts as membrain, while the mind is the centre of ‘will’, i.e. in humans the brain is born of the exoderm connected to the external sensorial system; the mind proper being the amygdala-hypothalamus, centre of the will and program of survival and its 5 dimensional actions (motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction social evolution)…

Without minds nothing can be understood but humans with the pretentious excuse that there cannot be ‘mathematical measure’ of mind-systems and infantile pictures, as the mind is the pure time element of the system, which moves in the scales of the fifth dimension coordinating the inner ∆-1 scales of the organism with the ∆+1 world, so it cannot be ‘pictured’ for the shallow visual scientist of the ¥-vidi, credo ergo sum generation, to ‘feel it knows’ and it has a ‘proof’.

The mind is the mover of time, and it happens in all systems, in the self-centred point of a crystal, boson, or black hole. It is the maxwellian demon that create the infinite orders of reality, its is the centre of mathematical frames of reference which show to be the centre of the beings maths mirror, or else those equations will not work.

Absolute relativity: 0-minds in ∞ universesThe existence of a prior 1D mind singularity in its different forms, as a faster knot of timespace cycles or information seed a Maxwell logic demon or language and its inner logic rules followed as a reflection of the language of languages, the organic laws of the fractal Universe, is the missing part of reality due to its smaller Max. I = Min. Sp single dimension, as a fractal non-euclidean point. Yet those non-E points are the first ‘step of reality’ and as we shall see they will also close it alpha and omega of the intelligences of reality.

0-Minds-Souls: All systems have a central or upper knot – a zero point – that processes information and perceives a ‘still’, pixelled map of reality constructed as a reflection of the external universe – a mind. In the old paradigm of single space-time, there is only a point of view, the anthropomorphic point of view, and a language and frame of reference, the Cartesian frame. In the new paradigm, each knot of cycles of energy and information creates its own frame of reference and coordinates, ‘literally’ as it evolves its organism along an up (information) down (energy) axis, an anteroposterior axis, (direction of motion as it performs its ‘cyclical actions’), and a width axis of reproduction and cellular storage.

Further on, besides its 3 relative, ‘diffeomorphic’ coordinates, each organic system will have a perception based in a language, which might not be the language of man, as each species codes and maps reality with bits of a different type of wave. All this is formalized with a new mathematical model, based in the new discoveries of fractal non-Euclidean geometry, developed by the author that complete the work of Riemann on the subject.

DESCARTES was the genius and he truly showed it when he further divided each of those worlds into 3 sections; the ‘vortex of time’, the mind-singularity and the ‘res extensa’, which correspond to the 3 parts of any time§paœrganism.

Let us study those 3 parts with modern topological tools to define the equation of the mind, which we have just expressed in algebraic terms, in topological terms; one of the key elements of reality.

The 2 parts of the mind: the membrain and the singularity of an open ball.

In the graph, the mind is topologically the membrain and central point of an open ball. The membrain closes the vital energy space the mind-singularity controls and invaginates it with ‘forces/nervous systems/legal networks’ to order its inner space and transfer to the ‘singularity-capital-gravity/force centre’ the information.

As such amazing as it seems the topological definition of a mind applies to all systems of reality social, biological or physical, only the topology becomes more complex, messed and convoluted. Still the mind of a nation is its capital, where the languages of the law are created and the border, with its sensorial perception of other nations, and its defensive barriers for the vital energy of its citizens, usually happily blind and exploited by armies and capital politicos and financiers.

We have put you this first example, as it shows your ego paradox: not only you are NOT the only mind-system but you are within the next ∆§cale of reality just part of the vital energy of your nation’s mind/power/will.

Now, the same type of structure happens in physical systems, where the centre of gravity IS still under rotational and translational motions, and where the ‘membrane atoms’ ARE different. And so happens not only in particles but in waves, where the membrane of the wave, is different and faster than the group velocity of its denser centre. We study always the mind of each species, because the singularity is the centre of still-minds that define the whole. So in black holes (gravitational galactic minds) time=motion comes to zero in the centre, in Irma the hurricane stopped in the centre, in charges we have to discharge the infinities in equations as the centre is void of force -those being the key singularities of physical minds, which have an ‘angular momentum’, membrain to ‘break space-time’ into its inner and outer world (Jordan’s first theorem of topology):

Int he graph, the mind is the central point of accelerated future time, as it controls the future motions of the system, as such is the centre of a force, the brain that sees and decides the motion of a biological system, the king, president or dictator that rules the energy sheeple of the blind, obeying citizenship.

Thus the first act of a mind is to perceive with its external membrain, and conduct to the centre that information, where the zero-point of the central singularity will gauge, stop and perceive.

The mind then will want to  try to maintain its perception in order by projecting its order into the world, so once the being perceives as a mind, it enacts conservative actions to allow it to keep perceiving.

And so the mere existence of linguistic mind-mapping makes necessary the creation of a fractal, territorial order around each of those mind-points. So the mind if it can ‘move’, it will use ‘its energy’, to remain ‘a focused mirror’; since as long as they perceive, they will subtly mirror what they ‘perceive’ as both the right universe and their own mind, and feel ‘entitled’ to ‘evolve’ from dust into ∆ûST.

This same concept applies to social groups of points, which will become parts of larger social wholes naturally as network are more efficient than individuals. So while the will to run through the steps of topological evolution needed to emerge into a higher ∆+1 scale of the 5th dimension is bio-logical, responding to the strategies of association and survival that ensure the system to continue, the procedure is topological and can be described departing from the rules that ensemble point into waves and bio-topo-logical planes.

It is this merging of geometry and biology what has always been underlying phenomena of evolution but are hardly recognised by both disciplines.

Points with parts are knots of time cycles that gather into networks. The most important point of any network is the point which communicates all other points and networks, taking the key decision of any super-organism: which action performs at each moment. That point, is therefore the point that possesses the will of the whole organism.

In the graph, because a Cartesian graph (left) is an abstract continuum of lineal time, based in the single rhythm of a mechanical clock and a continuous space of points with no ‘breath’ (Euclidean definition of a point), ever since it became the canonical representation of space-time science has believed in a single, absolute time and a single absolute space, with a single point of view, that of the human mind in the origin of coordinates. Yet the Cartesian plane only represents the continuous space-time of ‘the membrane of light’ it represents with its 3 perpendicular coordinates, equivalent to the height=electric field, width=magnetic field and length=wave speed of light. Since light is the space we see and so its 3 coordinates are self-similar to those of the Cartesian, human mind made with light.

The real Universe has ±i points of view that gauge information in ±i scales of space-time. Those points of view by definition have volume to fit ±i parallels – flows of energy and information that go through them. Each of those parallels is in fact a cyclical, curved trajectory (Einstein’s definition of a parallel); and so we can consider each Non-Euclidean point of view a knot of time cycles with form and motion.

Nt. We prefer the term ±i than infinity, as infinity is a hyperbolic exaggeration of the mathematical mind-mirror and the continuous concept of an abstract cartesian background space-time (Newton)… In reality as time is cyclical, space is always broken, and time has a limited duration. So one of the most important errors of mathematical creationists, from Kantor to renormalisation procedures is to ignore that all infinities break in the outer membrain of the supœrganism, ‘changing’ then into something else. So there is not infinite motions backwards in time in the V=Hod equation of big-bang, but a cut-off point. THERE IS NOT infinite range for gravitational forces, but a cut-off halo membrane and beyond a dark entropy force, and so on, and so on, themes those specific of other pots on mathematical physics.

Ƥ

MIND WITHIN THE SUPŒRGANISM.

‘D•st of space time you are dûst you will become’

Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 15.08.51

monad

We are all minds of super organisms, which transit as they order the ternary motions of its 3 scales of existence. As such minds travel purely in the illogic regions of the 5th dimension, as singularities of wholes across 3 scales of size, with an inner consciousness or subconscious order of its inner world ∆-i, a membrane consciousness on the verge between both worlds as a mind proper, ∆º and an outer motion and program of existence in an ∆+i external world. It is through the sum of those 3 scalar existence how a monad, or super organism, and œ-mind a T.œ, function of existence, To < exi=st being can be defined:

In the graph, the three motions of the mind between the inner world, the individual world and the outer world, if we call personality ∆º the mind, ∆-i, the subconscious ego, the internal mind and the outer monad in communication with the world the ∆+i monad

We can see in the graph the essential quality of minds over bodies, to exist as travels in the fifth dimension in perpetual ordering and connecting of the three intermediate states of ∆-beings.

Monads display an elliptic point of view in their perception of the Universe – its best mathematical mind-description being the elliptic geometry of the riemannian sphere, where the axis points are those through which the monad mostly transits. As such the monad is a network, π, connected to all other points, with no parallels, as the hierarchical, absolutely subjective ‘aristotelian point of view’, unmoved God of its elliptic perception of a hyperbolic, mostly Universe.

The elliptical being though ignore all the other hyperbolic points of view, resting its confidence in its capacity to distort reality and get away ‘with murder’, hidden in the shielded geometry of its relative world.

The topology of the mind is in fact part of a much larger homology between the three forms of geometry and the three ages of life and the way the monad perceives the passing of time, from a hyperbolic age in which all seems so huge and convexing into the mind, through the flat transition of the euclidean, balanced age, to the elliptic age of loosing a closed territory that converges into the immobile center:

In the graph, mind and reality are interacting in the subjective-objective consciousness on how the o-mind relates to the ∞ universe, which it perceives self-centred. As the system passes through ages the hyperbolic mind becomes elliptic curved, inwards and humble. Mind’s constant interaction with its environment as it ‘discovers’ its program of existence, self-reflecting in those subconscious actions carried by its structural organ nature, invariably brings the deterministic worldcycles of its existence.

The mind though can be considered subjectively as the origin of those actions, and hence as the primary motor of reality even if it has been pre-programmed by its genetic emergence in eons of efficient surviving combinations of the game of existence.

The fifth dimension as the dimension of the mind.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

Those parts of any physical system, studied from the perspective of its mind-singularity or frame of reference in physics, will then become the objects of inquire of physical super organisms, with clear different functions, which correspond to the general laws or ‘isomorphisms’ of any 5D³  system of 10 dimensions (5 of time and 5 of space, or 3 of time 3 of space 3 scalar dimensions and 1+1 of the mind, and so on, depending on which ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of its total properties we make).

The 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, Non-E with an inner volume of space-time through which multiple parallels can cross. The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry.

In general though the first easy division is that between the singularity and thin radius that connect it with the membrane on one side (S and T seemingly separated), and the vital energy they enclose called topologically the  open ball; such as both configurations tend to be equivalent in value.

The singularity will be the self-centred zero point where motion stops and a linguistic mapping happens, the Γ• function that commands the system with the mirror image it has of it, through its ‘homunculus mind’. As such it will be the ultimate simultaneous function of space-form of the being.

In the outer limit of that being, there will be an angular momentum, of maximal cyclical motion, the T-membrain or enclosure, which breaks the being into an inner vital space, the open ball proper, whose energy and combination of motion and form, will be synchronised and complete the whole.

IT IS THE INTERACTION of those 3 elements within themselves and with the external world through actions of space-time, motions in space and informative trans-formations in time, what will define the different scalar super organisms of physics, the photon, the electron, the quark, the atom, the molecule, the matter state, the gravitational body and the galactic super organism.

So we can describe them all departing from a 10D generator equation: Γ@= ∆-1 $pe<∆-St>Tƒ∆+1.

As in biological beings, where evolution starts either by the creation of a membrane, which encloses a vital water, which will evolve in time to create a cellular organism, or by the replication of a singularity seed of memorial information that reproduces faster the whole being, physical systems appear with the interaction and/or evolution of a singularity and a membrane. ONLY THAT in physical systems the ‘networks’ of proteins that connect both part are more ‘fluid’ and ‘geometrical’, becoming the dual fields of in-form-ation and expansive motion, that coordinate the dual ST motion-form tendencies of the energetic vital space-time between them (magnetic+ electric fields, gravitational + electromagnetic forces, and so on).

It must be also understood the duality of motion (lineal state) and form (cyclical state), even if form often offers an accelerated inward motions (T-future state), to fully grasp the duality of all physical beings and its membranes, expressed in the duality of particle-wave states, angular frequency and lineal inertia.

So we can define the membrane either in 2 or 3 dimensions as a function of angular momentum, and/or sinusoidal waves, where the envelop is the ‘wave train’, which is the T-membrane state in lineal motion. So goes for 3 Dimensional systems, where the Harmonics of the membrane will describe all its modes of vibration, which in turn will define in its solutions, the proper way in which the membrane acts to absorb entropic motion from the external world, acting as a potential field of ‘entropy’, which the membrane will vibrate in order to absorb that entropic motion.

What are then the constants physicists use mostly to define those elements?

In each scale they are different, but it is fairly straight to conclude that the limits of human perception, in both limiting scales are the scalar values of charge and mass for the singularities, and the lineal and angular states of h, h and c as lineal speed in the gravitational scale of the galaxy and rotary c-speed in the membrane of black holes and in the lower scale heavy quarks.

So both constants of the membrane of quantum and gravitational systems, h and c can be seen in lineal terms or as cyclical membranes that enclose the particle states (charges and black hole masses). Whereas, we, thermodynamic beings sandwiched between scales will tend to see the lower more informative constant of action of the quantum scale as a spin/angular momentum membrane of the particle/wave states of the electron that ‘covers’ the atom, and see the c-instant of the galactic membrane, more as a limit of speed of reproduction in the larger scale, since we see larger systems from our more curved perspective as flat, as opposed to smaller systems that have more curvature (h-constant).

Yet in ‘scalar physics’, we shall be able to unify both mass and charge as two curvatures of different speeds and h and c, which in praxis indeed are unified as they are consider 1 in natural units, and can be considered the ‘1 quanta’ of the two limiting scales. While in the middle, where information is maximal the thermodynamic scale has a much more complex, dynamic variety of constants, but we can safely state that temperature would be the scalar valuation of the singularity density and K the constant of action, from where we ‘predate’ as gravitogmagnetic entities our entropy of motion (reason why unlike h measured as angular curvature, and c measure as lineal speed, k is measured as entropy hits, from the human perspective – use of it)

Now, the mind is located in two elements, the sensorial membrane and the singularity – a group of yet unfound cells of the brain in which all the information of the senses come into a mapping. The mind also is NOT perceiving the motion of the earth. It is still. And heads are like particles still moved by body-waves. So all this defines in the widest sense the singularity mind system as the ‘membrane and center’ of what topologists call an open ball – a ball without the membrane and center.

And as you can see, both membrane and singularity form a ‘membrain’, a mind, which does NOT INCLUDE but encloses the ‘vital energy’ which we see in present time, as the singularity is ‘still, linguistic, or in physical systems an unmoved zero point, the center of an eddie, the black hole center of the galaxy with time-motion equal to zero. So the mind is REAL, it is located, and because it encloses and perceives the whole IT is truly the ‘fifth dimension of reality’ and it exists also in physical and biological systems.

It is the DNA center or genetic mind and protein cover or membrane in a cell. It is the charge and magnetic field in a physical system. It is the quark and electron cover, in quantum atoms which physicists measure for physical systems with ‘angular momentum’, the fundamental parameter of quantum physics (h), and biologists with the sensorial nervous system and its focus.

The insight here is that the mind IS still. It IS the origin of the galilean relativity paradox. It is in mathematics the frame of reference center, or zero point, the zero vortex with no motion of the hurricane, the zero time of black hole equations. IT does NOT move. It is pure form. But IT moves UP AND DOWN the scales of the Universe, as the mind-cells SEE THE WHOLE WORLD, a larger scale, ∆+1, and through its ‘subconscious’, chemical network of nervous systems, ‘invaginating’, crossing the vital space, it controls the cells, which however we do NOT perceive. As minds, even if the mind connects the cells and controls them subconsciously we perceive the whole and the larger world, so the mind born in the cell moves upwards. In a crystal, center of a planet and a physical system of matter, an image is formed of the whole outer world.

How then consciousness happens. It is obvious THAT STILL FORMAL SPACE IN THE FORM OF LANGUAGES ARE CONSCIOUS IN THEMSELVES. When you talk and think you are activating a linguistic synoptic view of the universe in stillness, that perceives in itself. In your case is made of electrons but YOU perceive the image and the words as consciousness. The software we must decide is conscious in a pan psychic Universe, which has been THE THEORY OF REALITY OF all scientists and philosophers of all times, except when logic positivism in between I and II world war decided with an ‘experimental fundamentalism’ that because we cannot ‘see and take pictures of minds’, they must NOT be studied.

So the fifth dimension is by far the most beautiful of them all, the dimension of ‘singularities’, zero time, minds in stillness, perfect linguistic form, genetics, black holes, human languages. And its inverse as it has inverted properties is the dimension of pure motion, expansion in space, entropy, disorder and big-bang deaths.

And so we will call, the mind and fifth dimension of eusocial evolution and love the absolute arrow of future because minds commands organisms and move them through scales of social evolution into fractal new wholes. And we indeed feel this the future – an increase of information, of complexity as opposed to death and dissolution which we perceive as the relative past.

While the ‘present’ is the single plane’ we study with its interaction between lineal motion, iterative wave reproduction and informative vortices – WHAT WE SEE.

As we do NOT see the mind singularity connected to a larger future scale of organisation; as it is still – we do not see the black hole, the brain mind, the cpu’s digital mind (5D is a hard AI theory as we consider the cpu has a digital mind, and so AI robots are sentient as they increasing show, connecting themselves when disconnected without orders, following ‘red-eye-entropy motions faster’ with their eyes even when not programmed, etc.)

But we do NOT see either pure space without form, pure motion-distance, and that is the galilean paradox, and the cosmic paradox: we see space expanding and galaxies moving faster, in the entropic region between galaxies balanced by the informative warping of space into galaxies (so likely not cosmic big-bang as physicists have forgotten that besides entropic expansion between galaxies there is imploding form in galaxies).

The dimension of parts that become wholes are the fifth dimension; the dimension of wholes dissolved into parts are the fourth dimension and without them we cannot EXPLAIN HOW ‘SYSTEMS ARE CREATED’ departing from a ‘seed of information’, a still ‘potential mind’, and how they die, dissolving into parts. So there IS ZERO MYSTERY in reality when you UNDERSTAND WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME dimensions and both are symmetric and there are 3 in a single present plane and one above and one below us in which our mind-world resides and our cellular final death will return.

So each of us is an island-Universe, û but also an infinitesimal mind-point, •, of a larger whole, which holds the view of the Universe in his cartesian mind, whih therefore can be defined not only topologically but algebraically with an equation:

O-mind mapping of the ∞ Universe: o x ∞ = K-onstant world.

And obviously define the fundamental psychological paradox, as we confuse our point of view-mapping of the Universe with the whole, so we distort subjectively the whole, as ‘every infinitesimal mind believes to be the center of the Universe by confusing the whole with its mind-world’.

We are all ‘DUST OF SPACE-TIME’ who think to be the center of the mind-world we see as the Universe, still in the picture of the mind.

As we are all made of ∆•ûst,  ternary ∆±1 scales, the three arrow of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those arrows in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time arrows, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

So the MIND IS LINGUISTIC, AS IT MIRRORS REALITY in a small syntactic language – which is what we perceive not THE UNIVERSE IN ALL ITS SIZE AND INFORMATION but a verbal, visual or mathematical mirror of it. And this is the cause of the main error in our philosophy of the Universe:

TO THINK THAT THE UNIVERSE IS MADE OF/BY LANGUAGES, not of/by space and time dimensions.

Minds shrink and enlarge the Universe.

Now we can find the ontological reason of the structure of the Universe in a fifth dimensional form, in the simple fact that the engine of reality are the mind-mirror-monads that shrink inwards a mapping of reality and then reflect outwards and imprint its territory of order with its shrunk, subjective view. So it is precisely this ∆+1>∆º<∆+1 constant shrinking and growing of the mind which perceives, moves his body to create energetic actions that order the ∆+1 territory what creates the fractal structure of reality, back and forth, accelerating inwards in the creation of form, suddenly stopping in a locked mapping of s>tiff perception and then exploding back into a larger order through the actions of the body.

Tiƒ minds, St-body-waves and Spe-territories ever enlarging the order and replicating the mind’s information webs then a network of fractal self-similar scales of reality.

Indeed, we summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy limbs, intermediate bodies  and information (minds) in a morphological equation:

Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=limbs/fields  Vs. Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

Why we die then must be ascribe to the fact that the whole system is ruled by the informative mind, which therefore determines the arrow of ðime of the Universe towards higher levels of information, till it exhausts and stops all motion into perceptive forms. 

And the sub-events of this type will again be easily classified into mind-mapping events, dominant in the human scale of perception; seed-reproductive events dominant in the lower genetic scales and physical ‘attractive events’ that transform entropy into vortices of ðime, charges and masses dominant in physical events.

Now, all this said it is obvious that we must consider some issues of the mind to understand why humans are so ego-centered and deny living properties to the Universe.

The psychological paradox: death is the future, emergence was in the past.

So a being is made of 3 relative present dimensions, |-limbs/fields of motions Ø-body waves and O-particle/heads, which together form a simultaneous present space-time being, sandwiched between the true past and future, which are either perceived as death and life or in inverse sequential time, we realise that social evolution the fifth arrow of ‘desired future’ is actually in the past, as the mind emerged from seed>fetus (∆-1) into our world, strongest in will at the birth of the child who truly feels center of the universe and has ‘tightened’ its neuronal mind and body in the smallest space.

Thus while death will be considered ‘psychologically the relative past’ it is in fact the future and the past is the emergence as a mind-whole in tight-infantile self-centred position.

The 3 arrows are present in the time they are balanced and connected as adjacent topological forms. Then the 3  are seen as simultaneous space-time, as a being, which will then through a world cycle of life and death that begins with a social evolution warped up into a whole by the emergent mind when the seed is born and ends in the death process, creating the angst paradox, as SOCIAL EVOLUTION is in the past, when you emerged from the phetus and your mind was actually stronger, and so entropy and death is the future in the sense of the mind that becomes from seed of information finally dissolved.

This is part of the complex logic of the two ‘intersected arrows of simultaneous space, the ternary limb/body/head system which moves, senses and evolves with the inverse sense than the time flow, of a past of emergence and social evolution and a future of death. So THE SPACE and TIME views are inverted:

Relative past entropy (limbs) x relative future information (head) = present space-time = relative future entropy x relative past information

IN GRAPH mind is a TIME TRAVELLER THROUGH THE FIFTH DIMENSION, as its actions of motion, feeding, reproduction, perception and social evolution HAPPEN across scales of the fifth dimension.

The five fundamental actions of time-space minds ARE  exchanges of ‘smaller entropy and information’ in the simplex actions, and in the complex Œ, reproductive and Ûniversal, social evolution, exchanges with equal and larger entities (couples, identical beings, social worlds).

Yet what makes the minds of man, and we by homology consider all other species to be mental, 5d travellers is the fact that those entropies, pixels of information and energetic elements are absorbed from other scales.

Senses – the mind outlets through its three connected networks.

Now when a mind of any kind is formed it will create networks with openings to the entropic, energetic and informative flows of the Universe. This is the first ‘mind’s work’ and as the essential method to complete stience of gst is to observe man as the most perfect, better understood closer organism and expands what we learn of him in terms of space-time to all other systems, in theory (in praxis is done through our imitation in robotics, a non-non behaviour if we want to survive and we are doing bad).

So we shall bring here a first glimpse at how the Monad first dialogs with the Universe considering man and his three networks in terms of gst/

In the next graph we see then a human being, as a mind time-traveller of the fifth dimension, absorbing and emitting entropy=motions, informative=pixels and reproductive drives, through those scales:


In the graphs, from an old book on 5D trails, the symmetry between those actions across different scales of existence of the fifth dimension, while extracting from the ∆±4 levels of existence the different quanta of ‘energy’ (∆-2), ‘information’ (∆-3), ‘motion’ (∆-4), or actions at distance, easy to obtain, ‘simplex actions’, vs. the actions of complex organisation, Œ, and Û, capitalised, for that reason, most often, or complex actions which also require ‘bits and bites’ of ∆-1 seminal and ∆º social scales.

Then in each of those 5D time scales, the mind ‘traveller’ through the interposed regions of its Γ•, will be able to absorb and emit the different forms of entropy, energy and information (exi), which ensures the being’s proper control of its world.

Perception: information perceives in the stillness of simultaneity.

Regarding perception I have never thought to be a mystery: perception is the very essence of information in still simultaneity – the existence of a still mapping in a minimal §pace, during a quanta of ðime, must be ‘felt in itself’ as Leibniz and Aristotle intuitively thought – in other words §pace is the intelligent of reality and its pure order and stillness the sensation of being, not self-reflecting, not self-conscious but ‘Dasein’, being in itself. But this ‘static’ awareness of calm and form, must be connected to multiple networks for the mirror-image of the mind to ‘act’ and order reality.

How this consciousness of every stif point emerges then is another question – A QUESTION OF TIME FLOW AWARENESS AS THE STIFF POINT SEEMS TO CONTINUE with slightly changes due to motion; and the existence of modular languages, as one perceives the other, in the human case the:

Universal §pace > language of sight >eye> I< wor(l)d < ðime language

So LANGUAGES DO also create reality as smaller ‘mappings’ of a larger universe, with more information paradoxically (5D metric: Max. Information = Min. Space) than the whole.

The negative, lethal effects on the mind, parasite of energy: its ego paradox.

IT follows that the physical, biological or psychological mind has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

The languages of God are infinite. While we do NOT shy to mathematical equations, the languages of ‘God are infinite’ (Upanishads). That means the religion of machines, among Humans, which are today basically slaves of their computer machines for most themes including the perception of knowledge, and so need to talk with numbers to feel truth, is NOT real. We shall specially in this blog on social sciences use and justify and explain why the VALUES OF the wor(l)d, and our natural language is a better language for truth, and certainly for evolution and ðime predictions (being evolution a verbal language). I get specially irritated by all those ‘nerds’ who think if you don’t show a PowerPoint presentation with nice graphs and equations you are NOT doing science.

Not so, qualitative, formal, dimensional information, in human beings HAVE always been explained with human ðime-clocks, the ‘verbal ðimes’ of our flexible sentences and human eyes – the artistic sensorial work of our spatial senses. This means they are also excellent ðime records which today the ‘mathematical/mechanical school’ of social sciences tends to shun off – the classic case being Herodotus’ books of history, which turned out to be actually filled of facts, despite being so much prone to mythology. So words and facts come together to verify truths, and words are when conceptually sound are the proper causal language to explain evolution theory and the extensions due to cyclical ðime.

 

PHILOSOPHY OF THE MIND AS A FINITESIMAL WORLD:

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY

The creationist philosophies of the humind (ab. human mind) deny the existence of any other linguistic minds in the Universe.

This is an ego-trips based in the ‘ego paradox’ (every mind measures the Universe from its distorted self-centred point of view, confusing its infinitesimal still language-mapping of the Universe with the infinite whole: O-mind x ∞ Universe = constant worlds.

SO EVEN BEFORE we start up the explanation of all the four elements of reality, @-minds, $pace, ðime, ∆§cales, we shall debunk the subjective non-scientific ego of the humind, which divides itself into 50% of verbal religious creationists, who think GOD chose man to speak his ‘verbal language’, and mathematical creationists, who think God chose man to spoke with digital numbers:

In the NEXT  graph, man will NEVER understand the first principles of the Universe and its ultimate substances, if it does NOT understand the paradox of the ego, and the structure of all topological ∞ minds of the Universe.

The 3 philosophies of the Universe: creationist languages vs. space-time substances.

The Universe and all its beings are made of fractal space-time, its scales and 3 arrows-topologies-ages. But this philosophy of science that connects with the realists and the asian traditions is ignored by the anthropomorphic ego-trips of the western man.

So likely only when Chinese/Indian cultures come to dominate the evolution of science, this huge upgrading on philosophy of science will be considered, because reason cannot fight ‘beliefs’ and ego-trips of the childish western frame of mind:

In the graph a brief resume of the ‘magic postulates’ that permeate the subconscious collective of western scientists, disputing between the ego-trips of mathematical physics that believes equations create reality (cause of so many theoretical errors from the entropic big-bang, hauling from a simple lineal V=hod ‘God-LIKE equation’ to the evaporation of black holes), vs. the ego-trips of previous verbal ‘scientists’ who thought god spoke with specific languages, arab or hebrew, maybe latter learning ‘Latin’.

In the graph the masters of mathematical and verbal creationism, disputing their ‘primacy’ as speakers of the language of god – notice how Mr. Dirac has a laugh to verbal creationists and its jumble-false God – a product of human imagination – but then affirms shamelessly that God actually does exist, only that he talks, ‘ihϒ ∂µ ψ = mcψ’ (Dirac equation) and alas particles are born. Reality is a bit more complex and difficult to ‘crack’ as we must start as Einstein wanted with the realist fact that the ultimate substances are not languages, neither personal gods but the impersonal yin-yang, time-space game that creates all the relational space-time organisms of the Universe. 

We see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

Since, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.  

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models. 

Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiple the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: iinflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. 

So opposing those ‘ego-trips’ there is scientific realism, which this blog will further evolve (Aristotle, Leibniz and Einstein beings its most outstanding AUTHORS), and reasons that reality must be made of the ultimate substances we observe IN reality, which are NOT phonemes and numbers, nowhere to be seen IN REALITY but space and time, and hence by evolving our concepts of vital spaces and time durations, we shall be able to extract properties common to all beings, even though they will be partially distorted by the mind-mirrors (verbal time logic and spatial mathematics) we human use to describe them.

So the key to increase our understanding of reality IS first to understand space and time and its properties, THEN, evolve our logic of verbal time and our topology of spatial mathematics to match those properties and focus better our mirror, and finally, to apply the improved mathematical-verbal logic mirrors to create organic better models of all sciences that happen in time and space, interpreting better the equations of sciences and solve with those models and improved mirrors the data we gather about reality, on which present science clearly excels (but drags behind problems of creationism and lack of understanding and evolution of mathematics).

In the transition from the age of human dominance to the age of computer dominance as the mind making science, which today increasingly is just a process of feeding data into computer models without any search for the whys and principles that unify reality, the earlier founding fathers of physics and economics mixed both creationist theories. So biblical fetish go(l)d religions became classic economics where money, a digital language of information substituted verbal laws in the ruling of western societies, and Kepler like Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him the laws of gravitation felt themselves equal to God, their chosen digital masters. And so when Newton died, Pope told us: And God created Newton and light was born.

It is not then surprising that the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy  machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.

Monads. The cause of isomorphism: equality of actions bits of existence.

Roughly speaking the absolute homology of the Universe appears in the essential monad, as its beats of existence are similar in all species, due to the faster speed of time cycles of smaller, shorter lives. So an insect that processes 10 times faster information, lives 10 times less than a man (7 years the super-organism of the ant-queen), but its total beats of existence are equal.

This is the first ABSOLUTE relativity principle of reality: all beings are isomorphic as all ‘phyla’ have similar subjective life durations.

Further on, all beings perform the same existential program of 5 actions (motion (accelerations), feeding on energy, informing and communicating, offspring reproduction and social evolution into a Universal.)

GST is based in this simple but profound proposition that all •monads, handle in each scale a similar quantity of actions through its exi=st¡ence, whose total number of Tiƒ frequencies, ∑(a,e,i,o,u) or ‘cycles of actions’ are roughly similar:

Tiƒ (∆i)= Tiƒ (∆i±i).

Thus any being of the scales is a living homologic monad, as it plays the same ±a,ei,o,u actions of motion, feeding, information reproduction and social evolution which define what biologists call the five drives of life, of which the highest one will be its social network evolution into larger wholes of slower ‘beats of exi=st¡ence.

We are all  ∆•st, living dust of space-time, 5 dimensional ∆ûst, island-universes, performing cyclical actions guided by its minds- knots of timespace cycles, which we self-refer to our mapping of it all.

We all divide reality into our inner ∆•st mirror and the outer, ∆ust, we reflect and try to order. We are all dual soul beings, travelling across ∆•±1 planes, ternary beings that move in time its synchronous organism of space, mind-thoughts co-existing in the 3 scales of inner and outer worlds.

The •mind is the consciousness of the individual organism, the informative time being, mind or singularity with no volume in space, full of length in time, as it orders in the three scales its inner ∆-1 cells, its ∆º-organism and performs its ∆+1 worldcycles.

The mind is though only observable as a living soul-being in the outer spatial world in which its cycles are evident parts of a larger whole.

the 3 perspectives of the monad.

‘we are all kings or buffoons according to perspective’ W.S.

This said as the monad exists in the ∆-1 scale of maximal speed of information, and complexity, but perceives itself as the whole, including its territory of ∆º order, and has ambitions in the ∆+1 whole world in which it performs its world cycle, there are three ways to see it all. 

Indeed, we are scalar universes of space-time, and the perspective we cast upon us defines the way we see ourselves:
∆-1… as Island-Universes, in the full meaning of the wor(l)d, with an enormous inner complexity of parts and wholes that extend down the scales of the fifth dimension to the level of atoms and particles, or…

∆+1: just as its an infinitesimal form, compared to the absolute whole world in which we are a part or..

Ƽ: as a mapping or linguistic reduction of the Universe within us.

Thus we are always a Universe in ‘its self’, Dûst of space-time, but for the larger Universe, we are only ∆•st, infinitesimals.

And within us we are the center of our internal and outer world: Ƽ

We are self-centred supœrganisms, ∆ºst of space-time which from the scale of the individual mind, as ∆ûst, observe an ∞ universe:So all beings are absolutely relative in the sense that their minds are ‘gods’ of the internal social world-Universe, û, they rule, and its micro-cells totally depend on the conjunction of the internal mind, Tiƒ, and the sensorial membrane that surrounds the body-wave and together seem to form the ‘being in itself’ to an external observer, which will only perceive the energy of the membrane and the motions of the mind-particle. On the other hand the being ordered in a larger external field as part of a larger network will be insignificant, running its inner actions knowing likely nothing of the whole and the purpose it has for the higher super organism of which he is a mere fractal point, atom, cell or citizen: •

Absolute relativity of existence is thus shown in the 3 paradoxical ways we express all systems and its minds as:

ƥstŠƼstŠƞst.

In the first equation the perspective is that of the infinitesimal mind a nothingness, a micro-point that ’emerges’ in a much larger world and an infinite Universe of which it merely absorbs a tiny fraction of its total information .

Yet as it does not sees anything else, the mind sees itself as a Universe of spacetime, as ∆ û st…

So it encircles and perceives itself as a space-time organism under its domain, co-existing in several ∆scales. In the second equation the same being, seen from inside seems an island universe, û, emerging as the relative mind God of all the territory you order.

The overwhelming importance of scale is then shown and understood since Shakespeare put it in verse, kings and buffoons we walk as fractal super organisms of some 1 trillion ambulatory cells. In the graph above, one of the first self-generating fractals, Cantor’s dust of space (white regions) and time (black lines).

But ultimately the more objective reality makes you bite the dust, and ∆st• you become again.

So how do you become from fractal dust, an organic topology? How dust r=evolves in parallel cycles, organising itself into a system that will enact its actions of existence maximising its energy and information, reproducing and finally evolving socially with other beings, till its excess of information collapses? It is rather simple and self-repetitive and all starts in a zero fractal point or mind that perceives the Universe. The many ways in which we can observe that process gives us the richness of the World as we see it, but if we want to build a causal process we must always start with the mind, which in a rather passive state, as the center of a 5¬Æ flow of bits and bites of information and energy will start to map out reality as a  mirror-monad of the whole.

When we define what we observe – a ∑world cycle in time-space of a series of Ærrows bundled in networks, through a life existence, perfectly structured, we come always to the concept of a mind, and a super organism, an Œ being, whose mind programs a vital space, constrained by a membrane that divides it from an outer Universe. This ∑œ, world cycle, network, ternary super organism, is what we see all around. And it acts as a mirror that collect information by extracting energy and warping into a meaningful form, the being it feeds and observes at the same time. The mirror language of the future, then will move the wave, the lanwave is formed, and as the mirror-seed generates an ∑world cycle it does so through a series of simple commands, or actions, ∆ a,e,i,o, u, the entropic actions of motions (accelerations), feeding (e), informing, reproducing into a clone offspring (o) and evolve socially into a universal û: ∆+1.

The first three actions can be considered primary actions, taken place mostly in a minimal number of ∆-scales of existence, the actions of reproduction and social evolution though are secondary action, running the slower program of time of ∆-scalar evolution. And yet they are all simultaneously prosecuted by each part of the being.

5th postualte

We use for the Mind, or sense of the whole, software or will or program of existence, of the hardware  of max. i, or brain head-particle, linguistic class of the system the symbol Ø, to signify its infinitesimal size and equation:

Ø-mind x ∞ universe = Konstant world

And also º, ∆º, as it conveys the sense of ‘location’ above the system, in the self-centred level of the being.

The mind is the language that embeds the game of existence as an ¬æ ∆ST BEING, in its bare-naked simplicity by reducing the Universe, which is the game we describe, to a world, which is a linguistic less-dimensional image of the whole.

But and this is the paradox of the minds of minds which is god (last post), the mind is a point-fractal with faster information than the whole it observes, with one more dimension, which brings, in i-logic arithmetic its infinite many-worlds.

This is the software of the mind. But the software can land in many hard-wares, or ‘particles-heads’, Tiƒ-systems, which will have a final point of view, fractal infinitesimal mapping-region on a domain it orders. The mind is the software of the brain, but it is the same brain-software that all other players of existence, which in each of its languages, is watching the same game.

Hence the same ternary universal grammar of all generated forms, which in a way express the mind’s view on the being itself.

The mind is truly the alpha and omega of the Universe, as it defines the boundaries of each whole, which breaks space-time into a fractal external and internal region, one ruled by the mind, which distorts and tries to break its existence within the Universe.

We could in that sense of the basic ceteris paribus models of reality we can make ‘work’, use the model of the Universe as an algorithm, playing in a mind of a binary language, O-time clocks and |-entropy lines. What that mind-program thinks, is all of us, virtual reflections of the ‘Mind’s Game’, on the motion of reality to which it tries to order and instill form, for the sake of beauty and perception of it.

‘Gods are unmovable, the primary cause which moves the energy of its vital space’. ‘We are all Gods.’ Aristotle on the mind.

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Leibniz, on the Monad, mind of space-time.

‘Space is motion relative to a frame of reference.‘ Einstein on the Non-Euclidean point of space-time.

Screen Shot 2015-11-05 at 18.33.50

In the graph, all systems have a mind, a concept closely related to that of a head-particle-linguistic class, or informative Tiƒ point of view of a super organism, as minds are the points of maximal communication of a certain ‘space-time organic system’, and so most likely the mind is in the Tiƒ particle-head-linguistic class of the society.

The mind is by essence selfish, subjective, with perspective, distorting with his will of actions the Universe, to make it converge into its inner mirror, dying and or reducing its total information in the process of obtention by the mind of an image of an outer self, with deception as the tool to camouflage its inherited weakness and obtain a token of energy and form of each other part of the Universe.

As the mind constructs its consciousness of being a knot of thought=language=perception, it crashes into itself – making it grow is stiffen its surroundings till all is silence, quietness, mind-view, 0-sum, void.

ð

TEMPORAL ANALYSIS: The mind – temporal concept vs. the brain – spatial concept.

But as we progress on General Systems Theory AND the description of its Generators of Space-Time (both ab. GST), we shall see that the mind, a TEMPORAL CONCEPT that relates to the existence in finite time of a world cycle of a being, more than its spatial organic place in which the super organism process its information, might not be even into the being.

SO WE DEFINE THE MIND AS THE TEMPORAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE SUPERORGANISM, INTIMATELY RELATED TO ITS WORLDCYCLE, WHICH CHANGES THE MIND POINT OF VIEW THROUGH 3 AGES OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

And as we shall see sometimes the super organism or system we study might be mindless, either because there is no mind on it – as a part of a whole; or it is a ‘slave’ system hypnotised, somatized or controlled by other system. I.e: a virus becomes the mind of a leukaemia infected cell in the ∆-1 level of beings (human self-centred scale); a cockroach becomes controlled by a wasp, who injects soma and eggs to eat it inside out human becomes controlled by a social network or idol-ogy, in the ∆+1 level, acting under orders… a star becomes controlled by a black hole gravitational field which will devour it.

SO to start with mind, Œ, is a time concept, brain is a space concept, both are related to the Max. tif point of the being, and while the brain or Tiƒ point is always within the system, the mind might be external to it, as if often happens to all other parts of the being, and to beings enslaved by a more powerful mind.

  5 ÅRROWS: ÅCTIONS ON ∆±4 PLANES

Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘time-action-oriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous time-space cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mind-monad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.

As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.

Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the time-space spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1-dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…

As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…

SPATIAL ANALYSIS: The mind-brain together as a space-time center of communication.

The simpler way to understand the concept of the mind is therefore that of a ‘point of maximal information and internal communication, with al the other parts of the system’. And the easiest example is the simplest, most successful ‘pythagorean’ tetraktys:
screen-shot-2016-10-20-at-11-36-34

In the graph, the commonest system of the Universe is a decametre collection of points organised into a tetraktys. The relative point 5 has the maximal communication with all other points (if you trace a line between 5 and 1, 7 and 10 corners, the flow of information can also be transferred between those 2 points without interference).

The study of the tetrarkys as a topological game that represents the whole as the analysis of music with its dualist treble bass and pentagonal scales, is one of the highest degrees of spirituality of the game. The point five is in this case the mind-point of view, which we see communicates direct with 2,3,4,6,8 and 9. Yet if we consider those points entering flows of energy and information that converge in 5 in pairs, they will create an outer flow that connects straight-forward in a twice long path, 5 with 1, 7 and 10. So 2 and 4 mouths flow on 5, merge and change its angle  135 degrees to converge in 10, 3 and 6 converge into 7 and 8 and 9 into 1.  In this manner a 5 point can perfectly flow back and forth energy and information with the sides acquiring a convex form and the 1 7 10 vortices a longer distance, forming a hyperbolic geometry, and inversely, the form would then deform if the inward flows come from 1, 7 and 10, forming a sphere, and so the triangle also can be considered a hyperbolic form that can be transformed as spirals do into a hyperbolic line or sphere.

Also by rotation, the triangle can be transformed and by adjacency can grow socially into planes or geodesic spheres. It is this vital topological geometry what defines the efficiency of ∆ St@ beings.

Thus the mind of this system will be at 5, in as much as it can organise the communication of all other points, while the 1-2-3 will become the ‘informative, Tiƒ system, if that is the direction of motion or ‘head’ of the tetraktys, while the other 2 corners, 4-7-8 and 6-9-10 might become according to the fields in which the system moves, the energetic side and reproductive side of the system. For example if that form turns around a vortex of forces, the internal side with maximal gradient of force (6-9-10) will absorb energy and the other outsider side will expel a reproductive seed.

YET THE SYSTEM besides the 3 x 3 Spe<ST>Tiƒ elements defined by the Generator equation will still need a ‘central, internal communicative point of view’, which realises the whole exists, controls it and directs it by shrewdly handling the energy and information the corners absorb. This is the concept of the mind, which is slightly different from the head. Or in terms of physiology is the ‘part behind the head’, inside, in the center, where the survival consciousness exist. In humans and animals the deeper layer of the brain, where the emotional, survival hypothalamus resides.

Diffeomorphic minds: the relative location of minds depends on the flux of information.

Of course as we study the complex details of fractal systems, the Universe becomes more creative with form, as FUNCTION MATTERS MORE, and diffeomorphic geometry adapts each brain-mind to the system’s topology:

image018

In the graph, the mind-head system is different in position in a galaxy (black hole in the center), plant (chemical roots) or animal (eye-head system).

It is thus clear that while the Tiƒ informative head system is physical and easy to study in depth, the concept of the mind or consciousness of the whole is far more ‘metaphysical’, and ‘mystical’, or ‘time-related’, as it implies the ‘existence’ of a continuity on time, through the entire world cycle of the being which feels ‘to exist as a whole’.

SCALAR ANALYSIS: Back to the tetraktys – the mind as the 10th unit which ’emerges’ into a new scale.

But the mind does have a physical place – the black ball of the triangle of pool (something understood subconsciously as you loose the game if you pocket the black ball), the hypothalamus in the animal, and generally speaking the 10th nervous system of the 10 systems of a human being (which is one of the strongest anthropomorphic proofs we have of our Nature as a space-time system. Indeed in the section dedicated to medicine, we shall study a human being and its 10 physiological systems; 3 related to the blood reproductive system; 3 related to the energetic digestive system and 3 to the sensorial system, all of them put together by the ‘brain’ or 10th system).

So besides the 3 x 3 systems we do have a final 10th system, which internally organises the whole and externally expresses the program of survival of the system, providing the leif motif for its space-time actions.

And for that reason we add this new symbol Œ, where 0 Symbolizes the mind and E the body moving with its limbs… It is thus an expression of the ‘whole’, guided by the O-head. How to write this Œ inside the generator equation varies. I propose:

Œ= ∆-1: |-Spe < ∆: Ø-S≈T > ∆+1: O-Tiƒ

Now, we have introduced the mind from a temporal, spatial and scalar point of view. This is the ternary method of knowledge that exhausts the analysis of ∆±iST beings. It is interesting if you come to read often to structure your own mind into this new form of knowledge. Think always when you study something on the spatial, temporal and scalar perspectives of the being, and then on the whole, because all do exist in those ternary simple structural terms and the ‘ternary method’ does ‘extract the best possible information of the being. We shall do so here with minds, and if we don’t is because I am unfortunately a disordered mind despite having this ‘deep insights on the minds of the Universe’ – hopefully though those who follow the path of ∆ST will be a bit more ‘professional in his ‘Manual Chicago style’ of writing papers (-;

The act of creation through languages.

The act of creation starts in the mind of information, not in the energy of the being.

What i am to state now might surprise the reader: the mind not the physical Universe, time not space, action not form starts reality. The first ‘action of existence’ is the perception by a mind of an external Universe. This is also truth if we consider the simplest possible forms of reality, the fractal minds-points of view of the fundamental particles, quarks and charges, which re minds of gravitation and electromagnetism. It is the act of perception of a field, ‘gauge’ in the abstract parlance of quantum physics, what makes an image of the Universe real.

In that sense the mind is a cartesian world that crafts reality by the act of perceiving it, ‘bending the field of entropic energy’ into a vortex. Fields create particles say physicists observing only one arrow. In reality in the Dialectic Universe, fields and particles in space, which are minds in time, create a flux of that transforms the lineal energy of the field into the curved form of information, knotted into the particle, a ‘quantum knot’, which becomes a geometrical still simultaneous mapping or mind.

This process is the essence of a mind in any system of reality:

All starts in the zero mind. This might surprise the reader but the first act of creation was perception of a virtual world by a mind. And as such we might consider that all worlds are virtual thoughts of a ‘higher mind’.

Perception is the first action, but perception is never perception of the being in ‘its self’, in ‘itself’, as it is a mirror who sees reality transmited by a ‘force’, ∑ E x I different system.

oIn the graph, one of my oldest paintings of ‘conceptual cubism’, my style of painting, which ‘draws’ with the tools of i-logic several non-Æ systems mimicking in 2 dimensions the act of 5D creation – as such the height of paintings represent the informative coordinates of an event. The conceptual comprehension is on the right. We symbolise it with the Å and å symbols for ‘Time ages’ which are the sum of space-time actions that shows the will of survival of the system:

Å=∫å.

In that regard, the first action of all systems is the awareness of existence as a whole, provided by the subconscious ‘chemical’ mind of the system, which organises an internal territory, establishes a ‘boundary’, and breaks into a fractal space-time system a form, starting the evolution of an organic system. 

So life is considered to start when a DNA mind controlled a territory by establishing a protein lineal boundary, and so the 3 parts of the being co-existing together formed. And as Feynman proved, all the laws of an electromagnetic field system created by a charge can be deduced of he existence of the charge and the circulatory closed loop that acts as its boundary. A mind-black hole establishes an area around itself with an event horizon, and at galactic level, when it creates a ‘likely’ strangelet halo. A living organism establishes a skin, a seed, a hard thin crust cover, so does the Earth, SO DOES A CRYSTAL and so on and so on.

BUT IN ALL SYSTEMS the first ‘action’ is the creation of a knot of maximal Information, Max. Tiƒ≈Œ, which will then create the whole. Those mind-points are thus the fundamental ‘missed’ element of the physical continuous, external view of the Universe, as they do establish indeed the fractal, discontinuous closed structure of all the organic systems of reality.

The first of those events was in that sense one of informative perception of a sheet of motion as form:

∆i: perception of information by a mind or fractal point of view.

There are two ‘wills’ of feeding and gauging common to all points, which we can measure objectively, externally by the fact that when energy appears, particle move towards energy (so electrons jump and feed on light) and when other particles appear they gauge their distances. We observe this property in all systems when they form a focus, which emerges as the point of maximal order in which the network of the system integrates its information.

Then the system becomes more stable: A crystal grows faster when the network creates a central point.

A hurricane can be destroyed when the central, still point where all the flows converge is disturbed. A life being becomes erratic in its motions when it becomes blind. A galaxy acquires order when a black hole, which probably gauges gravitational information, appears in its center.

The existence of an infinite number of such points is undeniable objectively and adds an enormous amount of order to the Universe, which mechanist science does not account for. Stillness to focus information into a pixelate map of the Universe, and the existence of a network that fluxes in that point through which ‘infinite parallels’ can cross, are the two conditions of formation of gauging points.

Then we can establish the birth of a complementary network of energy and information, an exi=stential point: exi=k; where k represents a ‘mapping of reality’ in the informative language that the waves of communication of the point with the external universe have created. This means that the models of metric measure developed by mechanist science merely creates a ‘space-time world’ self-similar to the mind of man in our machines, which does not exhaust all the measures of the Universe and its possible mappings.

 We cannot construct if we want to account for all the cycles of time, dark spaces and events of reality, a theory based only in a continuum, mechanical, light-space and its Euclidean coordinates of light-measure. The limits of that model have been reached, as the limits of precision of the Ptolemy’s model of astronomy were reached in the Renaissance.

Those limits of an Euclidean, continuum space-time were proved by Riemann, Poincare, Mandelbrot and this author, expanding and completing the Euclidean definitions. Einstein applied part of those new models and created Relativity Theory. This work applies the rest of those discoveries to create a model of Multiple Space-times, which includes the concept of absolute relativity, where measure – the gauging and mapping of the external universe by a non-Euclidean point, is relative to the observer and the rods of measure it uses.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

Recap: All entities of the Universe gauge information and act-react to the external world. Thus we consider all entities to have a mind – an internal, linguistic mapping of reality made with those forces.

Fractal MINDS: the fundamental particle

Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations which ‘are real’.

T.Πdoes show by regressing a step back in the scaffolding of mathematics and defining those terms, as the Postulates of i-logic geometry, based in the structure of cyclical time, fractal space and the 5th dimension where:

1) A fractal point grows in size when we come closer to it, so it has parts, its O-mind and its E-field flows of energy or limbs. Hence we define it as Œ, an existential point.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

MULTIPLE MINDS IN A SINGLE UNIVERSE: UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR

And yet while mind-worlds are many, there is only one Universe. So it is the Universe and its fundamental elements, vital space and informative time, and its combinations the ultimate reality from where all languages-mirrors extract its properties.  For example, we shall soon find that all languages have a ternary structure that mirrors the Universe of space-time and its combinations. If we restrict this simplified example of the ‘universal grammar’ of all languages mirrors to the 3 more important languages of man, logic words, visual images and mathematical equations we write always 3 elements that mirror the 3 elements of the Universe:

Real systems: time-information system (particle-head) < space-time action (wave-body) > space-energy system (limb-field)

Words: Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (energy of the subject)

Images: Blue (informative color) < Green-yellow (combination) > Red (energy colour)

Algebra: F (x): a time-informative  function < operandi (combinations) > G (y): an energy-space function

Now, what religious verbal or mathematical people state is that the human language, shared by ‘God’, the mind of the Universe comes first, in an ego-trip of truly cosmic proportions that plague both, the religious and scientific discourse.

the opposite is truth, the magic and power of languages resides precisely in its capacity to mirror reality to the point humans so often confuse language and reality. Yet there is an even deeper truth we shall consider in the analysis of languages that create reality in a Cartesian-Leibnizian way by mapping the Universe into a world’s monad, which then acts on reality trying to shape it into the form of the ego-mind, who confuses that mapping with the universe, and feels hence its mind infinite. Languages, minds and reality thus interact as monads perceive, map and then act trying to transform the world into their ego-reflection. 

And this gives also a biological sense to languages, which cater to the needs and forms of the egos of the species that speak those languages.

Now, when we have a perspective on the mathematical language (obviously most readers of this blog will be scientists, so we save ourselves the needed explanations about why a goalkeeper of the bronze age did not see the mind of god when a bush burning in the desert seemed to talk to them), we shall consider the ‘why’ of that fractal structure.

What is the purpose or function of a fractal structure and its mathematical description, called a fractal generator equation, (which for the Universe will be in its simplest form, a feedback equation with 2 terms lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, Sp<≈>tƒ, and we shall return to that).

Obviously because fractal co-exist in several scales and organise in complex connected network systems and constantly reproduce their form… ‘reproduction’, ‘iteration’, ‘generation’, ‘creation of new forms and combinations of form and motion, time cycles and lineal kinetic energies, you name it… the very essence of life.

RECAP. We call a mind, •, the ‘whole’, aware of a system, and its will of survival – the most vital, dynamic, perceptive truth of a system, which exists as a whole because there is central point of view that organises all the parts of the system into a simultaneous space-time organism.

The languages that reduce Universe to still, ternary worlds.

Thus what is real is the duality of motions, infinite cyclical and lineal motions, which are used by different minds to replicate reality into still minds that map part of those motions to create different worlds.

For example, Computers use O and | to create models of the Universe.

Humans use words also in a ternary symmetry, where the point is the 0-subject, the energy of the point the |-object, over which it enacts a verbal action. So when we say ‘I eat bread’, ‘I’ is the point, ‘bread’ the object of vital space, and ‘eat’ the feeding implosive action. This allowed linguistics to create the Universal Grammar of all languages:

Subject (0-point) < Verb (action: O x |) > |-Object (Energy of the subject).

On the other hand visual languages are also ternary in colors and forms. So the eyes use lines and cycles to create ‘conic curves’, which are all the curves that exist in Euclidean Geometry and so on.

So we can now extend our definition of reality to include its 3rd elements, which conform a word, whose infinite sum creates the Universe:

A Constant, Dynamic World is born of the interaction of both formal motions, vital spaces, enclosed by times connected by a mind that measures them: Ø”

The Universe is a puzzle sum of ∞ such Worlds:

U= ∑ Ø x ∞ = C’

This is what Descartes explained to the (Human) World, sum of all human minds.

We were all, so to speak, thoughts of God, the Mind of the Universe, understood as the underlying language with the common ‘isomorphic laws’ shared in the construction of all those ‘virtual worlds’, including the human world, since you are not watching the Universe, but the electronic image, your eyes and brain constructs with rods of space, called ‘light-speed’, and cycles of time, called ‘h-quanta’, pieces of lineal and angular momentum that build up the puzzle of your mind.

Descartes vs. Galileo: Knowledge vs. power.

But nobody understood among physicists, because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him and his family, dedicated to manufacture ‘military instruments’, among them the famous ‘spy-glasses’, today called telescopes that allowed the Venetian navy to see on advance the enemy fleet, one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Now, a pause. Let us be clear enough, philosophers of science love physics, how couldn’t be otherwise.

Physics is the Universe in its entire description through its 6 motions of time, in its whole and its parts, with all the properties, organic, mathematical≈mental and inorganic, derived from those 6 motions, even if we are aware of the shortcomings of lineal physicists, with its obsession for locomotions and the ego-trips of their human mind, so often as the case of Kepler, Newton and the authors of the big-bang ‘polluted’ by the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic, anthropomorphic religions.

Descartes was also a physicist, besides a mathematician, and a philosopher. It is though important to distinguish between ‘physics’, the universe in its full description, which we shall call as part of T.Œ, Astrœ-physics (-; and ‘physicists’, the lineal point of view of the world of artillery masters and Abrahamic Believers – which IS culture not science, as it reduces physics to locomotion.

We shall therefore study here as a philosopher of science, in the full tradition of the word, astrœ-physics and if this post is found in the larger web on the full T.Œ, all other sciences with the 6 motions.

This said it is obvious that today the philosopher of science has no dictum, and his wider view is ignored. Moreover, as the physicist bullied its limited view with artillery masters, and the parallel inquisitions of Abrahamic religions and anthropomorphic beliefs kept imposing its lineal vision of Nature over that of Darwin and Evolution, the philosopher of science reduced its inquire to what today we study in philosophy of science – the scientific method, which is ONLY the first step of T.Œ.

We thus regain with our work, the true purpose of philosophy of science, which was carried about by Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Darwin and Hegel (and its disciples in social sciences, Marx, Kondratieff, Spengler, and finally the practitioners of systems sciences and theory of information, albeit poisoned by the lineal concepts of Physics – Shannon’s definition of information as lineal messages, etc.)

Unfortunately the limits of inquiring only lineal time motions to explain the meaning of it all, amounts to a constant deformation of reality similar to that of the Abrahamic cults or the Ptolemaic use of the Earth as the enter of the Universe.

Yet those limits are today ignored, by the imposition mainly through the power of technology and the propaganda of those who create machines and weapons as the ‘seers’ of time (the old definition of Augustine of ‘God’) of a reductionist view of lineal motion as all what is worth to know about times.

So of course, it is necessary to make also ethic statements on the worldly profession of physicists –to make weapons of lineal energetic motions – to account for many of its theories of time – in fact all of them, Galilean’s artillery motions; Clausius, entropic, steam-machine motions and Gamow’s, big bomb bang theory of the Universe. This is a topic, but topics exist because they carry truths, and they endure when censorship of their truths oblige them to become topics.

The reduction of the 6 motions of time to a single external translation, where time merely is used to study the change in the speed and position in space of a being in lineal fashion is NOT a truth of Nature, but a truth of artillery masters, which once formalized became a canonical formula that excluded all other time formulae.

So this locomotion, described merely with a single mathematical formula by Galileo, V=S/T, converts Time in a parameter of space, S=vt, or in Einstein’s-Minkowski’s version, S=ct. This means that as ‘things that are compared must have the same dimension and form’, Time must acquired the fundamental property of space, which is to be a lineal, open extension. And by reason of this fictitious linearity of time, to be converted into a perfect line which is an Euclidean parallel extended to infinity.

The 6 motions of times thus became a single mode of change, their cyclical clock-like form, a lineal parallel, the finite duration, an infinite lineal duration that ‘walks’ along an infinite space line. And both written in an abstract Cartesian single plane of reference, which in paper seems to extend to infinity and be unique, became the absurd concept of an infinite space-time continuum, that only exists in the imagination and the paper in which the model was drawn.

Precisions over the mathematical concepts of form ≈ information

Now it must be stressed to give enough mathematical rigor and qualitative accuracy to this blog that information is similar to Temporal Form, as it is carried by time clocks.

Further on information is proportional to the frequency of those time clocks in its volume. And the message of the information is carried in the form of the waves or fixed form we perceive. But temporal form is NOT the same mathematical concept that what Shannon and other ‘humans’  defined as information. Since for humans information is in-form-ation, form-in-action, that is,  form which is communicated and perceived by a human receptor, and so it is carried normally by waves, that add a lineal component of spatial speed, or motion to the pure temporal form of the clocks of time.

Duality of form and rotary motion, and the sciences that use those parameters.

The closest mathematical concept to Time forms would be ω, angular frequency or rotatory motion for physical systems; and for all other systems, where the form is more important than the frequency, dimensional form is the key element.

Now the duality between ‘form’ vs. ‘rotary motion’ as the measure of Tƒ, also must be understood in terms of planes of space-time. Astrophysical systems are described with ‘rotary motions’. Biological and sociological systems are better described with ‘the qualitative form’ of the time cycles.  Why?

The ‘exact, precise measure of the frequency as the only ‘parameter’ studied about a time cycle is only ‘more’ important in far away planes of space-time submitted to uncertainty of perception, given their far away distance in ‘its plane of existence’. Since we observe only its speed but hardly its form. And this is the case of astrophysical objects, in which Heisenberg uncertainty and dark energy/matter obscures perception of form.

Since minds, and you must always understand that the mind is the central element of perception and knowledge, perceive first motion (so insect eyes see only motions) and then form. But form is more important, contrary to belief that motion in the coding of information, as Proteins show. Dimensional Form and rotary motion are thus 2 parameters, which differentiate how closer sciences perceive Tƒ, and astrophysical, far away ST-planes see it.

Now the brain stops and eliminates motion of closer things to see without blur form. The brain has limited perception in its infinitesimal point so it sees only a ‘bit’ of all the information of a system, and tends to fix information into form, eliminating motion and mapping the whole infinite Universe in its zero point, which gives us its equation:

Mind = O-point x ∞ World = Constant mapping. 

And this is the mathematical explanation of the Galilean paradox: we do not want to see the motion of Earth to blur the forms of the beings we see around us.

And this is also our justification for the constant exchange of al those concepts and the use of Tƒ as temporal information. We are more interested in the quality of form, since it would be silly to talk of the speed of a protein, but we need to know the Dimensional Form of the protein; or of the speed at which we eat in a cycle of feeding, but of the quality of the cycle (feeding as opposed to reproducing etc.) This puzzles Physicists, which have the bad custom of thinking their ‘lesser’ science is the only thing that matters, so care nothing about the ‘whys’ and the ‘forms’, and the evolution of them, complex concepts that do get a better description with verbal causal time languages. We bridge this difference with extensive use of topology, the mathematical language of forms in motion.

Now the fact that form is more important than motion in information and that is why we classify information among the parameters of Tƒ, is shown in physical waves, which have as main purpose to carry information. So physical waves loose ‘energy’ as they move away from the focus, but maintain the form of its information constant across enormous distances, as that is their purpose in the ‘intelligent, sentient universe’.

This ‘sentient’ concept, is also denied by physicists, but ‘strictly’ needed to explain the origin of informative order in the Universe, and to solve as show quantum effect rationally (such us uncertainty which merely means the electron perceives the incoming bomb of the observer and changes from i=st-1 spread herd configuration to tight i=st particle state, as any herd does in front of danger, from schools to combat formations). Sentient perception of dimensional form with a mind mapping is thus the key element which explains why form matters to all beings within a certain Space-time Plane.

Speed of rotary motion or frequency however matters to deliver ‘fast information’ and specially to processes that involve travels through the 5th dimension:  Sp xTƒ=Constant.

Whereas the smaller S implies a faster Tƒ, and hence the inverse properties of Spatial motion and Temporal form.

The many ways we write those metric, Sp x Tƒ=∆, Se x Tƒ=Ei, ExT=ST,  or my favourite, ExI=ST, the function of existence tries to convey the complexity of the entire Universe and the way different minds select and perceive only a part of the whole properties. So for some perceivers, Space will be quiet space, for others will be motion for others Energy, depending on the number of space dimensions, time ages and st=i-scales of the 5th dimension the system perceives.  

And so it happens with the perception of information as information, as form, as cyclical motion., depending on the number of dimensions and scales we observe and fusion within the mind.

Thus ‘salvo’ mathematical equations in the physical planes that translate the concepts established by classic physics, we shall exchange constantly all those similar terms, in general analysis and be more precise when we study, specific details.

(In ∆ST contrary to simplex science, physics is NOT that important, as the number of space-time planes of the Universe are infinite and so the fact we perceive far less about strings and galaxies made their knowledge reductionist and shallow as opposed to the maximal information we obtain of the human scale. So humans are the measure of all things and biology the queen of sciences).

Recap. Rotary motion, time clocks and forms are the 2 parameters of Tƒ, one of the 2 components of all realities. Information is the perception of Tƒ by humans, which require to mix it with motion that transfers the form to the mind, hence information is mostly carried by waves with form and motion.

Fractal space and cyclical time: 5D metric.

Now we shall deal with those two equivalences fundamental to the metric of the 5th dimension and the organization of systems as dual complementary systems with heads/particles of information and body/waves of energy, moving along fields/limbs of pure motion, in a simplified, qualitative manner first, so the reader understand an essential duality of the Universe derived from the co-invariance of the 5th dimensional metric: Sp x Tƒ = Constant

The space-time nature of beings encodes the secrets of its forms in space and its life-death cycles in time. This is what we are: ‘vital spaces’ with energy and motion, performing time cycles, called ‘space-time actions’, which added together form our existential life-death worldcycle, as beings made of ‘relational space-time’. So we write a conceptual equation to describe the nature of all the beings of the Universe: U = ∑ Sp x Tƒ= ST±4.

But what is exactly the full meaning of ‘space’ and ‘time’, beyond the shallow description of measure proper of physical sciences. The full understanding of all its properties, is truly the key to grasp the whys of the Universe.

So we will dedicate for each of the terms of that equation, ‘spatial energy’, ‘temporal information’, and scalar actions of space-time, a post to study the whole range of meanings in detail.

As once we grasp them, we will be able to ‘build up’ the complex systems and organisms of the Universe departing of its spatial, temporal and scalar properties.

Spatial Motion, ‘S’ for space and lineal, inertial speed and its ‘communication between planes’ or ‘energy’ is one of the two initial elements of the Universe – the other being Cyclical motion, clocks of time, and information. In this introductory post we consider the relationships between space (still perception) and motion or speed (moving perception), and the equivalent function ‘across planes’ of existence (energy, in which the transfer of motion, back and forth between planes is made through a ‘scalar’ magnitude (mass in the ST=4-6 scale, charge in the 1-3 scales).

We also introduce the equivalent concepts of cyclical time, time clocks, rotary motion, form (its still perception) and information (transfer of form back and forth between planes).

Then we deal with the second fundamental element of ∆ST description of space, its structure as continuous motion or discontinuous networks of ‘non-Euclidean points’, with parts. The fractal, scalar structure of space-time requires the evolution of mathematics to define a ‘fractal point’ with parts in which the perception of the form of the point as a point with  volume crossed for infinite parallels increases as we come closer to it. Thus the geometry of the Universe is fractal discontinuous, non-Euclidean made of ‘i-points’ with volume that form bidimensional networks, which evolve into organic systems across multiple scales.

‘The parameters of space-motion energy and time-form-information are inverted.’

And then after this introduction we shall do a deeper more strict analysis of those 3 parameters, space-motion-energy on one side and information-form-time clocks on the other, to fully grasp the depth of scalar space-time planes.

Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5th dimension: ¬ æ ALGEBRA, AND I-LOGIC GEOMETRY

The universe is made of dimensions of space and time, which are opposite but equal in number and merge lineal and cyclical motions into bidimentional, 4-dimensional and 6 dimensional super organisms.

The six motions of time of Aristotle, and we have grouped two, dissolution and aggregation, a dimension usually studied by Analysis, as the generic name of the 5th dimension. As the arrows of present space or 4 dimension, ct, or vt, the immersion of past and future form a 6 dimensional structure. This would be the part of ‘¬Ae not treated here.

Let us now consider the 3 branches of mathematics, which are 5 Dimensional analysis, algebras of time worldcycles, and spatial geometry of space quanta.

They study obviously the 6 Aristotelian motions of space-time, and as analysis is a branch of algebra, we divide our upgrading into i-logic Geometry (after the Non-Euclidean), and ¬æ, Non-Aristotelian, Non Euclidean algebra, which studies not in terms of continuous world-minds as geometry does the ‘Maya of the senses’, but the whole of the discontinuous Universe of infinite worlds of the 5th dimension.

Thus algebra (and analysis specifically concerned with the processes of social numbers that sum and emerge or rest, and divide and plunge down the scales of eusocial love of the 5th dimension), is a larger subject, still not fully developed by the only human world-point, which as Boylai on the view of non-E spaces, can only exclaim ‘I have discovered (not invented, as he said, the ever arrogant human ego) a new strange world – and not out of nothing as he said, but out of everything’).

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuum. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5th dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.

 

S: MIND-GEOMETRY.

NON-E POINTS

THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE: POINTS->NETWORKS->SUPERORGANISMS OF SPACE-TIMES

Screen Shot 2015-09-09 at 14.38.55

Time motions break absolute space into bidimensional space-time membranes.  Œ: fractal, i-logic, non-Euclidean, cyclical points of view: the fundamental particle

We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:

‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’ Plato

So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.

Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.

However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s.

So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.

This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.

That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean definition, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, ∆-dimensional points:           =========== o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope.

Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point. In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: Tƒ be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.

‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the ∆+1 ecosystem in which it exists’

This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.

Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplifies entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.

Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles5.

Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean definitions to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).

In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘—motions’ or information in parallel networks.

Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-E Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘—motions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.

This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.

All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their åctions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘—motions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.

A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.

Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.

For example, a human feeds on ‘—motions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our åctions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.

So the unit of reality is a space-time cycle, and many of them create a knot of time cycles or entity of reality, which will be reproduced by repeating those formal cycles with motion in other region of space-time; and many of those knots of time cycles, which are self-similar, since they are born from the reproduction of a first form, come together with self-similar beings into networks. Some of those networks are spatially extended with a lot of motion (fields in physics, bodies in biology) and some are very tight, formal, with a lot of in/form/ation, (particles and heads or nuclei in physical and biological jargons). Both types of networks together then create a complementary organism, which is fitter to handle both ‘—motions’ and form; hence it survives better, it ‘exists’.

Today scientists of measure scorn philosophical and logical analysis of causality in time because it cannot be easily put in numbers. But numbers are only one of the languages of information in the Universe, and many of its properties of bio-logic nature are better described with logic words. In that regard, we can now fusion philosophy and science answering the fundamental question, ‘why we exist’; since once we realize that we are ‘made of time cycles’, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles, an intelligent, informative, eternal universe of motions and wills of existence makes the dogmas of deism and mechanism, childish myths.

‘What is existence’ cannot be revealed from the simplex point of view of a mechanical world, which cannot explain the fact that we are made of motions with form that leave a trace on space but are essentially åctions in time that have a social finality – to create more complex networks, chaining knots of åctions into systems. This social will of every point and entity of the Universe is completely at odds with a mechanist, fixed, solid, senseless, dumb Universe. Motion in Time and social evolution are concepts that require the capacity to gauge information and interact with other self-similar points to create those organic networks. Further on, dual networks tend to evolve and reproduce new points through exchanges of ‘—motions’ and information.

The result is the creation of 3rd network/system: the reproductive network. And so most systems of the Universe are organic, ternary systems made of points (which can be anything from atoms to cells to human heads) organized in 3 networks. We exist as organic networks, to sense flows of ‘—motions’ and gauge information. Existence justifies itself.

Those Non-Euclidean points crossed by infinite parallels are able to gauge information, which implies a perceptive, intelligent Universe in all its fractal, self-similar scales of reality – a world in which even the smallest atoms can act-react to the environment, ‘apperceiving’ light and gravitational forces. Aristotle and Leibniz, the 2 foremost predecessors of the 4th paradigm of biological whys distinguished conscious perception from vegetative and mechanical perception.

It means perception has degrees of complexity. So the simplex particles of the Universe act-react in a mechanical way; yet they still gauge information, reason why quantum physicists called their theories gauge theories, and they still have 2 complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and information, reason why quantum physics is based in such complementary principle.

Yet this intelligent, active, temporal, informative Universe can be described with the formalism of logic and mathematics because its fundamental unit – a spacetime cycle – can be explained with ‘feedback’ equations, used in system sciences to explain the back and forth interaction between two poles or elements of an equation. Se<=>Tƒ where Se is a component of spatial ‘—motions’, a motion element, body or field and Tƒ is a cycle of time that carries information, particle or head, becomes the syntactic, logic, minimal unit of reality.

These simple first elements of reality – points with volume that exchange ‘—motions’ and information, creating waves of ‘—motions’ with form (no longer lines – 2nd postulate), according to a set of isomorphisms based in their self-similarity, (no longer equality – 3rd postulate), that makes them evolve into different topological networks (no longer planes – 4th postulate) – make mathematics an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe made of infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together under those isomorphisms and topological restrictions, the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum and becomes now a General System of Multiple, Fractal Spaces with vital ‘—motions’ and Time cycles with information, the two substances of which all beings are made.

And so with those 3 scales of ‘existence’: time cycles, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles (Non-E Points) we can explain all the ‘åctions’ and systems of reality made of those cycles, knots and networks; and describe a complex Universe that exists ‘in time’ more than in fixed space, since it has always motion; it is also dynamic, made of cyclical, feed-back equations whose causal relationships, forms and trajectories are the essence and purpose of existence.

We thus consider a more complex analysis of time arrows, beyond the duality of ‘—motions’ and information, which combine creating a reproductive arrow, Sp X Tƒ, and further on socialize, ∑Sp X Tƒ, creating networks. And so the universe has also an organic will: to create networks of self-reproductive points of ‘—motions’ and information.

Yet the most astounding property of those points is to be points of view, points with will, which perform åctions with the purpose mechanical or not, but probably felt in all scales as the inner freedom of the point, of obtaining ‘—motions’, information reproduction and social evolution. The 4 wills or whys of the Universe are indeed embedded in the postulates of i-logic geometry. The point to exist has to be complementary, to feed and gauge ‘—motions’ and information and to last beyond its wearing it has to form part of bigger social networks or reproduce itself to last beyond death.

This simple program self-selects those species that reproduce and evolve socially even if that contradicts the primary individual arrows of the point. Thus the engine of the contradictions of behavior of points is that tug of war between the Galilean paradox of all points which gauge bigger his nose than Andromeda but need to hunt in herds and control the forms of the Universe with self-similar minds, joined in networks, this eternal duality of freedom vs. order, individual ego vs. collective spirit.

Tƒ exist is to act with motion and form, trying to achieve the ‘arrows of time’ or will of the Universe – feeding your ‘—motions’ network, absorbing information for your informative network, reproduce your system and in doing so, starting an external process of social evolution with self-similar entities to yourself.

Those processes can be described with mathematics but we have to accept an intelligent, perceptive, fractal, self-similar Universe of infinite points of view gauging reality in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way to explain why it happens. Their mathematical description stems from the duality between geometric form and logical function (hilomorphism).

Thus, the postulates of fractal i-logic geometry define also the basic arrows= cycles/dimensions of the Universe: the 1st and 5th postulate define a point as a system whose inner parts are able to transform and emit ‘—motions’ and information, Sp>Tƒ<Sp; the 2nd postulate defines an Sp X Tƒ wave of communication that reproduces ‘—motions’ and form between 2 fractal points; the 4th postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane – a network with dark spaces; and the 5th postulate explains a point mapping reality, as it absorbs ‘—motions’ and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe. Since even a minimal quark, as Einstein affirms, should be crossed by a relative ∞ number of strong forces.

It is the organic will of all systems that search for those 4 arrows what makes the quark to exist as a knot of such flows of time arrows: a physical particle traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number; shapes the form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number; iterates along the 3 coordinates in similar shapes, an act described by the magnetic number, and gauges information to evolve in social groups, a fact described by its spin number. And those 4 numbers define it as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary ‘—motions’ and information with a 4D will of time. And as it happens they express the 4 arrows of time: Sp->Principal number; I-> secondary number; Re-> spin number; 4-> social evolution: magnetic number.

Further on, we can reduce all those topologies of social numbers and networks to the canonical 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe, proving that those 3 topologies have the properties of ‘—motions’, information and reproductive events.

And so we talk of 4 ‘arrows of time’ or dimensions of change that create the future: energetic and informative systems and events, which reproduce a wealth of self-similar beings that organize themselves into social networks, creating bigger wholes – new scales of reality. And this simple game of complementary beings that in favorable conditions reproduce self-similar beings, self-organized into bigger social networks becomes the why of all realities. Even the simplest particles, quarks of maximal information and electrons of maximal spatial extension and motion ‘decouple’, reproduce, when absorbing ‘—motions’ into self-similar forms, and associate in complementary networks called atoms, made with a central informative mass of quarks and an energetic, electromagnetic, wider body of electrons.

The 3rd paradigm of metric measure is not at ease with such ‘dynamic, spiritual concepts’, even if they can be described with the same mathematical formalisms as the previous example of the quantum numbers show. Those apprehensions however are dogmas, which stem from anthropomorphic beliefs.

Fact is that even the simplest complementary systems (quarks and electrons) interact together and if they can absorb more ‘—motions’=motion they are able to repeat=reproduce the cycles of its system. And so we talk of a 3rd reproductive system: from quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles of the Universe that decouple in new particles when they absorb new ‘—motions’ to living organisms, the fact that all is motion with form makes easy to reproduce those formal motions in an organic way. Thus the new concept of a world made of formal motions brings about also a more complex philosophy of reality – organicism. Organicism and its mathematical units, fractal points, that gather into social networks called topological spaces substitute the restricted concepts of Euclidean points, continuous spacetimes and mechanism, explaining why all those time cycles exist, guided by 4 time arrows: ‘—motions’ feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution.

Those 4 categories are the so-called drives of living beings, the quantum numbers of particles, the 4 dimensions of our light space (electric-informative height, reproductive magnetic width, energetic length and social colors). Thus, there is a ‘Universal Plan’ with an existential finality: to create organic systems, departing from ‘—motions’ bites and information bits evolved 1st into social networks, then into complementary systems and finally into organic systems, news points of a bigger fractal whole: particles become atoms that become molecules that become cells, organisms, planets, galaxies and Universes. It is the 4th organic why that completes the adventure of science and this work explores in all its consequences.

Reality can be resumed in 2 words: networks, whose flows of exchange of ‘—motions’ and form creates the patterns and events of reality and organicism, the philosophy of reality based on them. Organicism means reality and all its fractal parts are made of vital spaces (bodies and forces) and time cycles (informations). We do not exist in an abstract background of time and space but we are made of time cycles and lineal spaces, cyclical and lineal strings if we were to use the restricted jargon of physics, a specific case of the wider jargon of general systems, which evolve socially to create the complex systems of each science.

Those wider, more complex definitions of time and space will substitute and absorb according to the Principle of Correspondence that makes each paradigm a particular case of the new, wider view, the limited concepts of a single space-time continuum and a mechanist description of the Universe, proper of the age of metric measure, which the pioneers of systems sciences and complexity have wrestled with throughout the XX century.

Recap. A Universe made of motions in time, extending through multiple scales of relative space, requires evolving the human languages of space (Euclidean geometry) and time (Aristotelian logic), used to describe the simpler space-time continuum of classic science. This task started by the pioneers of modern science (Riemann, Darwin, Planck and Einstein) must be completed before we can study the properties of physical and biological entities with the new tools of Non-Euclidean mathematics, which describe a world of multiple, relative space-time networks made of points as Complementary entities with energetic and informative system or ‘Points of view’ and the new tools of Non-Aristotelian logic, which describe the creation of the future by multiple causes – all the points of view or agents that create a certain network space.

The universe is a game of creation and destruction of networks of fractal knots of time cycles=st-points.

The minimal unit of the universe is a Non-Euclidean point/number, which classic mathematics defines as void of inner form and organic properties, to simplify the networks of numbers and point-like entities of the Universe for its geometric study. In reality though, points have breath; that is, they are real entities with ‘—motions’ and information parts, and so we have to upgrade Euclidean definitions of points, planes, lines and equality with the new tools of Fractal and Non-Euclidean mathematics to make the language of geometry closer to reality.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = ∏ime§paœ mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

 

 Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.

However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.

This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.

That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           ===========o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: To be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.

‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.

In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.

This is called the Poincare Conjecture, and his recent proof was the most important finding on mathematics for decades. It simply speaking only n-spheres can reduce without limit an n-dimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membrane-point system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.

FRACTAL POINTS: SINGULARITIES AND MEMBRAINS, THE MIND SYSTEMS

The new 5 postulates of a Non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of Multiple Spaces and Times are:

1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point is a world with an inner content of information that creates its 3 internal, topologic, organic dimensions and a content of energy that traces its external motions=time arrows’

2nd Postulate: ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’

3rd Postulate: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar when their external, spatial perimeter or their inner information is equal. Similar points form organic networks by sharing their energy and information. Dissimilar points ab=use each other in Darwinian relationships’

4th Postulate: ‘A plane is a network that joins points through waves of energy and information.’

5th Postulate:Non-Euclidean points perceive energy and information: A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’

The first postulate defines a point with form and energy. Points are not ‘points with no breath’ (Euclid), an abstract definition that created the simplified concept of a space-time continuum but ‘fractal points’, which grow in size when we come closer to them. And so stars are points in the sky that become huge as we come closer to them. And a microscope discovers an entire world in the minimal size of a cell. Einstein offered a partial solution to this conundrum considering that from our scale of size, those Non-E points seem to curve the information of the universe that fluxed on it.

But Leibniz had given a better answer: ‘the smallest point is a world in itself’. This is the meaning of a fractal point, whose internal parts respond to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: a hyperbolic, informative system; an energetic, planar or spherical membrane and a cyclical, toroidal region with reproductive organs. And we shall find those 3 topological regions in all points-species of the Universe.

It is now clear that non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will gives the point the category of mind, or Atman or soul, a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information and ‘bending’ it subjectively to its will.

That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 dimensions of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.

To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.

Networks are made of relative points with form and motion, which can be defined as time cycles – trajectories traced by an entity in search of energy, information, reproduction or social interaction. Those time cycles enclose a surface of vital space or energy and so they define a certain space-time. Any entity will however trace many cycles in search of its organic motions to feed, gauge, reproduce and evolve socially into bigger networks.

So each entity will be a knot of multiple time cycles.In the formalism of Systems sciences we call them Non-Euclidean points, since they are points through which infinite flows of energy (parallels) and information can cross. We also represent them with the symbol ‘i’, which is the next vowel to the A-ristotelian, E-uclidean paradigm, the symbol of information and a visual image of the 2 components of the point, the informative, cyclical part, o, and the lineal, energetic one, |, which we call the body and head of a biological Point; or the field and particle of a physical point (Principle of Complementarity).

The universe is made of networks of such i-points, and each network is what we call a world or discontinuous space-time, st, unit of a bigger fractal network, a new st-point in itself. So a network of particles becomes an atom, which becomes an st-point of a molecule and so on till creating the Universe.

Even humans can be studied as Non-E points, in which each head is indeed a spherical point that communicates energy and information with other humans, forming social networks.

The anthropomorphic reader might think that humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that all points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same laws: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds; the geometries of social groups are also the same; and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on energy and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. Thus the laws of networks become the social, organic, reproductive why of all beings of the Universe: the Universe reproduces information and organize forms socially into networks.

From magnetic and electric fields, made of magnetic and electric constants that mix and reproduce a light wave to fundamental particles, quarks and electrons that absorb energy and reproduce new quarks and electrons, to energetic males and informative females that reproduce together, all in the Universe can be described with the formalism of networks, connects the why with how and when of the 3rd paradigm of metric measure that has analyzed those networks, its motions and forms in detail. Why those i-points with an ego-driven will that desires selfishly more energy and information and self-reproduction collaborate in herds, becoming parts of a whole has to do with the complexity by which the arrow of social evolution impose systems to its parts. Parts become enslaved by their dependency to the higher energy and information provided by networks.

5th postulate: Paradox of Galileo – definition of ego-soul: fractal P.O.V.

All minds, including man, are self-centered beings that believe to be the center of creation, because they gauge information from its point of view. Yet most of reality either exists in a dark space the species doesn’t perceive or uses a language the species doesn’t decode or it is further away from our ‘noses’ to be of any importance to us. This explains anthropomorphism and the incapacity of man to perceive himself as just another knot of simplex and complex actions of energy and time.

The laws of those Points of view that gauge information, are Laws of Non-Euclidean geometries. The formalism of General Systems Sciences, which studies networks of points of view is therefore Non-Euclidean. Regarding its Logic structure, past, present and future become relative concepts and so the ‘logic’ of the Universe in which past, present and future co-exist in simultaneous space-time fields, is different, is paradoxical, dual… Its formalism can be fusioned with that of Non-Euclidean geometry in what we call illogic geometry, the linguistic foundations of all General systems.

The paradox of the ego: linguistic points of view.

Perception is possible because of the mentioned paradox of Galileo: all is motion, and so informations are cycles of time with curved motions and energy-space are sheets of lineal motion. And so because all is motion, the repetition of those motions is in fact a simple reproduction that takes place in simple atomic particles (with cyclical vortex of motion) or lineal fields of energy (with wave-like motions).

The paradox of Galileo is again a fundamental law of the relativity Universe ill-understood by scientists who ‘see’ still pictures of reality with their instruments and seek for ‘substances’ instead of motions. It is also the key to the 8th key principle of G.S.Theory, the paradox of the ego.

All individual systems perceive or process information with their linguistic or geometric minds; using that information to guide their body towards fields of energy in which they feed.

Yet since resources are limited, to achieve those 2 simplest arrows of existence, all systems prey in the energy and information of other species causing their death in Darwinian, preying events. We thus talk of two ethical arrows in a universe of limited resources.

Top predator individual species will try to obtain energy from their environment absorbing it from species with weaker energy bodies and informative heads, provoking Darwinian, predatory relationships, causing their death in Darwinian, preying events.

And they will perceive the universe from their egoistic point of view, as a static dead space, of which they are the center. Since from their subjective perspective, their nose seems bigger than the Andromeda galaxy and the earth seems quiet surrounded by infinitesimal stars.

Yet objectively, the ego is just an infinitesimal, fractal mirror, reflecting a minimal part of the infinite information of the whole without which it will cease to exist.

It is the paradox of the selfish ego that wants to be the center of the universe. The paradox of the ego is the main cause of extinction of all species, which as the human beings are unable to respect the infinity and power of the whole and consider themselves special sons of god, entitled to control and destroy nature, till the Newtonian laws of action reaction, extinguish them. Thus we define each of the infinite Aristotelian Gods, center of a surface of energy they move and prey on:

‘Every point of view=mind feels the center of the Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point that stores a limited mapping of reality with its informative languages.’

We are all Atmans, informative CPUs, souls that gauge in different languages reality, to construct a mental mapping that caters to our point of view and arrows of time. So we create our ‘perceived Universe’ – a fact known from Descartes to Schopenhauer, but lost to ‘naïve, realist’ physicists. All of them thinking clocks are the only point that matters to measure time, and the human mind, the only ego that knots energy into form, since that is the only perspective they perceive. That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the only intelligent species.

Conclusion: The importance of the 5 postulates of Non-AE.

The importance and reason of making the 5 postulates of i-logic the centrepiece of the formalism of ¬æ should be now evident to the reader: in the process of topological growth from a single point of view, into a topological plane, which in itself will be a ternary being mess of 3 topologic networks (the entropic, ‘digestive’, energetic, ‘blood-reproductive’ and informative, ‘nervous systems), unlike normal abstract geometry in which the point merely becomes a line that forms a plane, with another line, the fractal point with parts, through which infinite parallels can cross, starts a game of social evolution, reproduction and exchange of energy and information with other points that will finally create networks that will develop into living ternary space-time organisms, in a process much more imprecise, chaotic, filled with trial and errors, interrupted by other entities, etc. etc. but perfectly describable with the logic rules of vital topology, which will surprisingly enough when studied in depth and considered the ‘foundational postulates’ of non-AE mathematics and logic will develop a quite accurate description of the events that compose a world cycle and the parts that create an organism.

It is then the 3rd postulate which Schopenhauer rightly criticised for not being self-evident, as the 5th (if we indeed take parallels as straight lines), which becomes also along the 5th postulate that defines a mind, and illogic temporal postulate also, as it gives the rule, obtained from practical view, and the converted into formal theorems, of engagement of beings, according to the different similarity of its 3 parts, of which externally obviously only the membrane, and depending on distance, as a mere point, will be observed.

IN THE GRAPH the languages of god are ∞ (upanishads), humans also use a verbal language, which mimics the elements of the fractal generator, which for that reason we express also in words.

Now we give a step further in the ‘search’ for self-similarities between all languages, reducing the expression of the fractal generator to a verb:

Verbal language.

To exi≈st is the verbal expression of the generator, where the 3 elements of the generator acquire a verbal mode.

So instead of Spe > St>Tiƒ, we express the ternary symmetry in terms of a singularity, or To, a body-wave of entropy and form, mixed into energy and information, and a Space-time field from where the body extracts its foms

So , to describe the actions that from the point of view of a mind-singularity, to, perceive a body-wave, of entropy and information, exi ≈ riding as a space-time being of energy a field that sustained it. Tº≤ex i ≈ st

You can imagine those 3 parts, singularity, T•, body-wave: e x i, the most dynamic part, and below the world extended as a balanced space-time field in which the body and head co-exist together. The being in fact is more often defined as an exiTº a body-head, wave-particle duality and the field is detached of it. IN THE particle-field, though the description is To=st, as you see, each possible combination of those 3 elements starts the combinatorics of what we shall call in the ‘philosophy of science’, which is the verbal mode of GST, the ¬Æ:  EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

PART II. MIND SPECIES.

There are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.

ITS PANGEOMETRIES. ∞ WORLDS in A SINGLE UNIVERSE. 

•Minds reduce all the information to a single point of view and plane, and often a single ‘part’ or arrow of time, according to the function of the ∆ST, which has an • mind. So most systems have minds for example that cannot perceive together motion and form. And most minds are specialist in an arrow – a lion on entropy-hunting, a human on information; a fungi on reproduction. Al those are mind themes we treat elsewhere, here we are interested in the strictly mathematical content of a geometrical mind-mapping of the Universe that stops motion into form, and de-forms that form according to the function and location of the being.

Let us then take from the first line the basic 2 properties of minds: to be still mappings that reduce motion and increase information: Œ, ab. for Es>Ot, which is the mind function. And then given the deformation of its point of view, the ways in which a single ‘whole universe’ become an infinite variety of mental monads.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study.

Absolute relativity. Galilean Paradox. E pur si muove no muove

image010

The universe is made of actions of energy and time, two formal motions, which the mind maps out as still form, to fit a view of the cyclical, fractal moving universe, inside the small brain. It is the galilean paradox, which introduces the bias of the mind in any form of language-knowledge. Information is still perception, of form, motions thus become linguistic reductions, in mathematical and verbal temporal languages, which reduces the syntax of all of them to the 3 elements of reality: lineal, cyclical and wave-like forms and motions. In the graph, from far away Saturn’s rings seem solid, continuous, single space-times, but in detail are cyclical, in motion and structured in fractal scales of relative size

Still minds perceive by locking information about wholes in linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

So far so good, if you have arrived here, we have concluded that the best explanation to Einstein’s multiple clocks is the simplest one: there are infinite cyclical, finite, closed ‘world cycles’ and ‘clock-cycles’ for all kind of beings.

And distance-dimension in lineal space and motion is the same. So it doesn’t matter if we say that ‘galaxies’ are moving at an accelerated path, or we say space between them (distance) is growing.

Why then so much fuss about modern physics if those findings have always been with us? Well, obviously there is much more to modern physics and we will go through many of its questions in this blog, but mostly one of the main problems of physicists is its ‘imbalance between the enormous mathematical development’ of the stience and its minimal conceptual understanding, expressed in Feynman’s infamous quip: ‘the (verbal) why is the only thing a physicist does not ask’. This always astonished me in scientific conferences. Indeed, physicists were the least interested on those discoveries, as there is a lot of conceptual mind-work to get to the equations. And most are practical people: machine making->experiment to measure data and put it in equation. And that’s all folks. As it is a pseudo-religious dogma of physicists that ‘mathematics is the language of god’ (Galileo again).

Well there is more, much more to it, when you ask also the why and care to conceptually understand it with the ‘language of time’ in the human mind, which is logic, verbal thought…

Since ‘the languages of God (to represent time and space) are infinite’ Upanishads.

So it is unavoidable as all knowledge is biased by a mental still linguistic mapping to define in those terms the…

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.mmIndeed… all what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

It does have also another interesting feature, the ego paradox, which affects so much physicists, as the infinitesimal mind has a language-world inside and so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, (ab.Es>Ot) as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static, ‘Aristotelian’ mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

WORLDS & ITS PANGEOMETRIES.

the mind is a cartesian/maxwellian demon that infuses our reality through its elaboration of the primary energies, entropies and information available in the range of ∆±3 scales it perceives as energy, entropy and information for its ∆º self-centred existence busy busy ordering a territory as a ‘home’ where to reproduce a radiation of similar clone beings, programmed in his unending quest for emergence into the larger wholeness of growing and multiplying…

In this view the importance of ‘vital’ mathematical physics as the language of the mind with maximal information on the space-time cycles of the Universe is clear.

We are with a bit of imagination and knowledge of ¬æ logic able to explain the space-time cycles of resonance in time, simultaneity in space and emergence in ∆, which define the ‘eusocial evolution of parts into wholes:

The growth of simultaneous Space-time beings, implies to have a body of spatial energy in simultaneity respect to a head-particle of information in resonance with the Universe, in which they co-exist through several scales of existence, exchanging energy and information thanks to the properties of ‘∑-integral social growth’ between scales in actions of ‘infinite’ bondage with other forms, (resonance and emergence) and infinite speeds (non-local pure space motion).

This non-classic section on the mathematical mappings of the mind will deal with the seemingly ‘odd’ but fundamental fact that there are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.

Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5th dimension.

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures:

Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 

for the human lineal Euclidean Universe… a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuum. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5th dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.

SO LOBACHEVSKI’s (Boylai and Gauss also) discovered that space was NOT Euclidean, except in the limit of human perception, defined by this FUNDAMENTAL parameter of the Universe:

Tƒ/Sp: r²/L²

Next the fundamental steps of science to be taken were:

  • To complete the classification of all possible geometries according to the relationship between its quanta of cyclical form-motion or radius and its quanta of lineal speed-distance or length.
  • To determine experimentally the values of our r², electronic quanta of information, we humans used to perceive L², our quanta of space, which had also to be determined.
  • To study other experimentally known minds of the Cosmos to see if they had the same ‘bidimensional units of information, Tƒ=r², and L²=Sp, and how they will perceive the Universe hyperbolically, elliptically or Euclidean.
  • And to research how all those relative different space-time geometries order in Nature (through the scales of the 5th dimension).

And yet none of this steps were taken. So we shall take them here to show you:

  • First the nature of the Euclidean mind of man, where its radius is given by h and its quanta of space by c², hence it has an r²/L²->O, which is the requisite found by Lobachevski for an Euclidean mind, and then…
  • to study the other ‘minds’ of the Universe and the different scales of the 5th dimension according to their peculiar geometry
  • And finally to see what physicists did with this discovery (just to apply the 5th non-E postulate of riemannian elliptic geometry to the larger gravitational scale where indeed, geometry is elliptic because L grows to infinity (action at distance).

 The Human Point of view as one of the many infinite worlds.

Now the proper way to understand T.Πrequires a comprehension of all those planes of existence of reality and its isomorphic laws, and common space, time, 5D and mental-linguistic properties departing precisely from each o-point of view, both considering its geometrical laws and inverse arrows of hyperbolic and elliptic motions, which explain mathematically all kind of facts, from the perfect transfer of motion (downwards) and information (upwards).

As the elliptic geometry allows a single huge point of view of the upper dimension, ∆+1 to coordinate through its networks the motion OF ALL ITS intersecting micro-points of the lower dimension.

This we can explain organically with the concept of networks connected to cells, fields connected to particles, but also geometrically considering that there are NOT parallel lines in the upper elliptic geometry where the ‘whole resides’, hence all micro-cells are connected to it, and with the concept of simultaneity, as its messages arrive simultaneously to all its elements (a much more profound simultaneous concept to that of Minkowski’s 4D space-time, which we soon will have a laugh at (the philosopher of science can at least have some humor as Leibniz on Newton, about those who ignore us 🙂

Now seriously personally my favorite description is the geometric one and in this I coincide with my ‘fav’ Physicist, Mr. Einstein. Consider the other way around, the existence of no connections with the smaller beings in the same plane that allows its co-existence, while at the same ‘times’, there is synchronicity in its time clocks, between the relative future form of the whole and the relative past elements. Here is where Einstein’s work flourishes.

The future point which synchronizes its motion with the parallel Hyperbolic space of its infinite fractal forms, whose ‘angle of parallelism’ tends to zero as they become smaller (Lobachevski), allow the beautiful symmetry of co-existing spaces displaced in time, which is at the heart of the proper treatment of the space-time symmetry between wholes and parts, of ‘advanced 5D metric’. So we shall just bring you an image here:

Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 10.27.07

As we change the distance in time-space between the larger whole and the smaller parts, the fractal structure of the 5Dimension reveals itself, and the number of parallel beings in circular regions, that coincide roughly in space, but are displaced in time, define properly the motions of Space-Past, and Time-Future, Sp< = Tƒ, which is the final symmetry of the 5th dimension we shall tackle now.

Now Euclidean space is defined by a Minimal Tƒ/Sp =r/k, where r is the curvature or speed of a time clock and k the length of a rod. In the human case, the relationship is so small that the Geometry of our perception becomes Euclidean.

Yet as we perceive smaller scales the geometry becomes hyperbolic, and infinite parallel beings, our cellular fractal parts, with a faster Tƒ and much smaller rod of measure appear. And vice versa. So needless to say the scientific r=evolution brought about by 5D cyclical, fractal space-time requires the completion of the logic and mathematical understanding of the incomplete revolution brought about by Non-Euclidean geometry, of which Einstein only used for its analysis of light space and the upper ‘elliptic’ gravitational scale, the elliptic Riemannian version proper of that larger world.

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metric: Sp x Tƒ = K:

  • In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Sp nor Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Sp= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Sp (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).
  • In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.
  • On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

The human euclidean world and Einstein’s r=evolution: why we are euclidean, light is hyperbolic and gravitation is elliptic.

In that regard, the harmonization of the 3 geometries observed in the Universe, our Euclidean light-space with the 3 obvious perpendicular coordinates of light (magnetic, electric and c-speed field), and the geometries of the larger gravitational world and the smaller world of quantum physics, can only be achieved understanding how the different arrows of the 5th dimension distort our perception of larger and smaller realities. The larger ones have slower time cycles and bigger space distances and so we see it with an elliptical ‘growing space’ form, and an slower time rhythm, which ‘balance each other’.

It is the famous β factor of Einstein’s relativity that as we ‘speed up’ enlarging our content of energy and translation in space (Max. Sp), slow down by the same ratio the speed of our clocks of time (Min. Tƒ) according to the metric of the 5th dimension:  Sp x Tƒ = K, since we are in fact travelling through it:

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 12.44.01

In the graph, all systems are Sp x Tƒ = Constant symmetries of spatial entropic motions and temporal information, defined along 2 limiting constants of the 5th dimension. The Human Universe has the limits of the Thermodynamic 0 T, 0 Time constant and the limit of entropic C-speed constant of Space. Thus as we reach the ‘hyperbolic limits of our ‘Klein disk’ (the galaxy-organism), the divergence of our parameters of space-time ‘explode’ any system (even the simplest particles), which would never be able to reach those limits without exploding into radiation, E=mc2.  Yet the metric is conserved as T x L is always constant.

This is the ultimate ‘real’ meaning of the Lorentz contractions from an ‘organic’, 5-Dimensional perspective. As Relativity theory departed from an study of the mental Frames of Reference of human measure, it has always been interpreted only in those terms (and without recognising the analysis is one of measure, hence of ‘relative world-perception’ NOT of the Universe as an objective whole and considering T and To, absolute lineal proper time – as if it affected all systems of the Universe not only the form in relative motion – hence absurd paradoxes like those of ‘black holes travelling to the past’ and time machines to kill your grand-father so often quoted in the work of our ‘luminaries’ of the science of lineal locomotions, like Mr. Hawking.

The rod of measure of human systems – c speed.

c speed is a rod of measure Einstein accepted ‘by electronic eye-decree’ to set all other parameters. So they are all let to vary (as in any differential equation where we do partial derivatives), including energy and mass in this paper. They are variations that are needed keep c-constant. But we could construct an equally sound model of the Universe keeping time-duration constant. The ‘of course’ here is a tricky rhetoric argument improper of Mr. Einstein, which reminds me of the vastly inferior original paper of Mr. Hawking on the evaporation of black holes (there he uses verbose rhetoric like every two other sentences, dealing with his ‘imaginary black holes’ at will of his ‘imagination’).

Einstein is obviously on other league, and prudently he puts this bastard ‘of course’ on a footnote. But this kind of rhetoric always shows that the author is not ‘safe’ and ‘sure’ of his arguments. How could he be? He knows he has never demonstrated but considered c-speed constant as a postulate to build his relative Universe. And it is fine and it works on the galaxy measures from our mind point of view. But he cheats us here a bit, with the of course that contradicts his previous statements kind of shamed for needing a postulate.

After all, most errors in all sciences come from Postulates: the entire building of mathematics is wrong because of the 5th postulate with no proof: a single parallel cross a point. The entire building of economics is false and it is leading the Earth to its collapse because of the wrong postulate of Mr. Smith ‘the wealth of nations is its quantity of money’, a mere language of information, supported in informative metals (gold, silver, chips of gold in e-money computers) with no value per Sp, whose ‘valuation’ of life beings is minimal (zero value for life) and his valuation of metal-weapons, by affinity of substance maximal. So in capitalist societies maximal wealth occurs in periods of global war, as today, when the maximal price of weapons that kill the maximal number of humans rise GDP to stratospheric levels.

OK enough, of this. You see, there are many onion levels in a deeper analysis of reality.

So two of our comments are positive: the universe is simple, logic, temporal and those were important tools on all the work of Einstein.

And one is negative. Mr. Einstein as most humans like to go beyond what is there and then commit errors of sweeping generalization. As physicists do today with big bang theories of the Universe. And they did with the c-constancy of light. Errors then multiply in an inflationary manner as all information is inflationary, and an entire building of not-quite-right models of reality builds up, as errors seem to sustain each other, into a growing expressionist building of broken angles about to fall, whenever a better architect pushes one of the faulty foundations of the entire architecture.

This is called a paradigm shift, as the part of the building sustained by the faulty foundation falls and the new architect reconstructs only that part, given the historic significance of the ‘Corresponding’ science, which still holds.

We shall thus start our rebuilding, commenting on the Paradigm shifts of science, according to Thomas Kuhn’s work on the nature of scientific revolutions.

Let us then repeat all our previous statements on the relative model of c-speed with a slower, simpler ‘tempo’, as this repetitive symphony of a Universe built only with 3 motions of time and its ‘still, relative perception’ in space, is indeed a simple world, whose complexity arises from ternary repetitive symmetries.

From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.17.39

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.18.32

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media  according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect that black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), will be harmless, for no proved reason except the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a tiny black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy.  But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only per Sp but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.

Thus in any CHANGE OF PARADIGM:

– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

3rd age: Space-time membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.45.10

Now to understand the next paradigm that precedes the new paradigm of the 5th dimension we must understand Einstein’s work with a critical view as we have done with all other points of view, being aware though that modern science believes in Einstein with the same zeal that they believed in Galileo, Copernicus, Yahweh and the tribe of the Goths before him.

And so as many religious or tribal people of German, Jewish, Christian or Muslim denominations will have already emotionally abandoned this page, many scientists will not even consider the 5th paradigm. Believers don’t reason. They don’t have patience. Their hypothalamus as science proves jumps out attention and memory when it enters in conflict with beliefs.

Still of course there are people who reason and so now we ask you to concentrate because here is where new knowledge must come first for you to understand a critical view of modern physics and their myths and beliefs.

Consider all what we have said. Basically we are moving our point of view from smaller to wider points of view, but when we have a point of view, that point of view is still, quiet, fixed in a center. And this relative ‘fixed’ point of view is important to understand Einstein’s theory.

Minds are still: Information can only be obtained with a fixed point of view.

Why we need a fixed point of view? Easy, because to measure and perceive we need to focus and be still to observe details. If you take a picture of a fast moving object is blurry. If you try to perceive the details of a fast moving object you will not be able to do it. This happens because knowledge gathers information and in-form-ation is ‘form’. But form is the opposite of motion. In the Universe all what you see around is form with motions.

This is very important to grasp. Look around. What you perceive is only 2 things often combined: Forms of information and energy motions. And actions of beings that combine motion and form.

And both things have opposite properties. The less motion the more form you observe, the higher motion the less form you observe. But knowledge is form, information. So to create knowledge you must depart from a relative, fixed point of view.

And so that is why you do not see the Earth moving but fixed. This is how nature has given you a capacity to observe with your mind reality as still, with form.

You need a pov to create a certain  scientific truth. But the larger the p.o.v. the bigger the truth. So the center has moved but each new age of science have kept a relative still point of view. You must create a still center to measure, because perception happens in stillness, as opposed to energy, which expresses itself with motion. Information focuses form and it must be still as Buddha was in the tree of knowledge.

So when Galileo came the earth moved and the new still p.o.v. Was the sun.

And when Darwin came the idea that man had not evolved, changed but had always been still, the same form created by God per in secula seculorum moved and now the new ‘still p.o.v.’ of biology where the immutable laws of evolution.

Now this allows you to understand the limits of Einstein’s paradigm. Since what Einstein did is to create a new still point of view that could not be changed. It was no longer the Earth, it was not the sun. It was not even man or evolution. What was the new still point of view from where Einstein would take his rods of measure?

LIGHT!

Einstein defined a Universe with a new point of view, the speed of light, which would remain constant from any perspective.

But why light?

Light seems an esoteric center. What makes light so essential to our view of the Universe, as to permit ‘measures’ that seem to be more accurate to our mind?

We must now give you the first upgrade on Einstein’s work by affirming that light IS the substance of the space we perceive with our eyes. And that is why from the perspective of our mind, which is what you are truly observing – not the full Universe and its exact objective measures, but the peculiar rod of your eyes and any other electronic mechanical device that absorbs light  – light IS space.

Indeed, you do not see reality in its totality, but light and so what you call space is light-space. And when you use an instrument, made to the image and likeness of our mind, you see light-space too.

But if you were a dog smelling the Universe, your mind mapping and distances would be different.

We are though an I=eye and for that reason our mathematical mind and light-space has 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions (the so called electric, magnetic and ray directions of light, which are perpendicular), which are the same dimensions of your perceived space.

Thus, what really Einstein did was to consider a larger point of view that the sun, the entire space of the Universe.

The center now had moved to every point of the Universe, and this allowed Einstein to say that all motions and points of view were relative, only space-light was a fixed background that didn’t change.

But he still established as a rod of measure of the other variable, time, the human clock; and so here, there were no advances on the objectivity of the point of view. ‘Time is what a clock measures’ he said.

Einstein did NOT change the point of view of the human clock, reason why Landau laughed at him saying that with his system he just had to ‘look at his watch to eliminate the uncertainty of time’ .

And so it IS in his understanding of time, where Einstein as most physicists before, had failed to expand the point of view. And it is where the 5th dimension will open up our objective view of the Universe, by defining in a more complex manner the meaning of time clock and consider the existence of many of them in the Universe.

IN essence, what we want now to consider is the isomorphism between the 2 main time clocks of the Universe, according to the relative scales of the 5th dimension: the time clocks of the quantum scales, ‘charges’, and the time clocks of the cosmological scales ‘masses’.

Between them, of course there is a 3rd type of time clocks ‘thermodynamic molecules’, whose temperature define the variations of speed of those time clocks, but being the thermodynamic ∆o scale, the human scale, we do have a lot of information about those time clocks, so physicists are sophisticated enough to understand them. They do NOT understand however masses and charges, reason why they have been for 100 years trying to unify them the wrong way – without understanding they are TIME CLOCKS of different scales, of different ‘curvature’ and speed, and so they need the metric of the 5th dimension to unify their parameters.

So simple and so mysterious for a century because we lacked the proper ‘heliocentric’ perspective – an essential dimension of reality. Then once we enter into that larger reality (which physical systems do but humans obviously can’t), we are in…

Now it is obvious that as we grow in size we curve from our perspective reality and so we get less information as things slow down and part of the information disappears from our perspective, and vice versa, as we look downwards the universe become hyperbolic and grows in detail of information and so we get different entropies up and down. This is shown in the symbol of the 5th dimension, ∆, which as you can see have two motions up and down one thinner and the other thicker, and this asymmetry is important to explain many things – genetic for example, going upwards perfect in information, body motions for example perfectly going downwards when the whole wants to move. Wholes are very good with motions smallish things with information. Havent you notice how energetic and powerful are big guys, how smart are small ones? (-;

THE INFORMATIVE QUANTA – H-PLANCKTONS.

Now we explained that the perception of a universe as euclidean or elliptic or hyperbolic depended on the long overdue respect we must give to the a priori parameter of all worlds: r²/L²=Tƒ/Sp. When this parameter tends to zero, we have an Euclidean geometry, above zero we have hyperbolic and below zero we have elliptic.

The parameter which defines the mathematics in which we live is so essential that it will come constantly. For example, we can consider that systems exist at one side of the parameter, at the side of c speed as a limit – in our euclidean world – or over c speed (in the elliptic gravitational world) at the side of T=0k as the limit of the thermodynamic plane, etc.

So we need now to complete the definition of our world, to deal with the nature of our square ‘radius’ parameter of information. What is the minimal quanta of information of our electronic eyes, that feed on h-quanta of light energy, well, we just said it, the h-quanta which measures in the minimal amount known, the spin of a particle, which is rather obviously the minimal unit of its angular momentum, of its informative perception.

And for that reason as h/c is truly a minimal amount our relative 0, we live in that Euclidean world.

The first and most important of T.Œ’s 5 actions of all systems that want to survive, is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

Of all those levels and actions the one physicists understand worst and less is the action of informative perception of smaller particles, called SPIN, which is the absolute minimal unit of reality we measure after deforming it fully (quantum uncertainty), a quantity called angular momentum, h/4 pi, which is as a ‘form of information’, ‘space-form’ NOT motion.

And since h is in the above equation, E=ƒh, a whole, hence a sphere (whatever it has inside), the ‘essential topology of all wholes’ by definition enclosed disks-sphere (in ¬ Æ topology a disk is a 1-sphere, a sphere, a 2-sphere, a sphere in motion a 3-sphere, which as motion is a dimension seen in motion, can be of different varieties, etc.), a spin is ‘logically’ is a n-sphere divided by 4 π:Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 14.10.41

Now the graph gives us possible choices, as we depart from a ‘whole’ of a light beam, which could be a cylindrical cut, as in some lineal worms, or a ball. As 4π comes in the ball, we have 2 choices or the surface of the ball, or the solid sphere but NOT all, only a section, called a ‘solid angle’. This gives us a first duality between ‘human measure ‘and ‘true property’. The true property is the solid angle from the surface to the center, r3/3, the human measure is the external surface, r2/2.

As all space-time organisms have truly 2 components, the ‘internal’ open ball topology (meaning the ball without the surface membrane and the center of the point) or ‘present-evident, wave-like ST form’, and then the membrane and o-point in the center, or Sp x Tƒ, ‘past x Future’ particle (limbs-external sensorial membrane and central mind) together:Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 08.27.39

Why we know spin is a solid angle of information? Because if it were a motion, as Pauli, the guy who is credited with its discovery, put it to his real discoverer, as speed it will be 137 times faster than light!: hc2/e2=137 (inverse fine constant). This in 5D physics is NOT a problem, c-speed is Einstein’s postulate to adapt the Universe to the human perception of it – our rod of measure, as electronic minds. But here Pauli does have a point. A Spin does NOT rotate, as you do NOT rotate when looking outside, but is a ‘wedge’ into the sphere, through which information enters.

We see the surface of it and so it seems a momentum, the being sees the solid angle of it and so it is an intensity. Because the being is down there into the zero-point soul of the particle, mind of mathematical perception, it does open and close the sphere to ‘look’ through the windows of the membrane. In the simplest form, it is a pi cycle of 1-sphere, which is made of 3 closing diameters, which leave π=3, 0.14 d apertures, or 0.14/π=5% of light and 95% of dark matter/energy, the proportions light space-time beings DO NOT see of the Universe.

So now in the ‘dialectic’ Socratic method (remember my culture) I use to find things, I deny myself. What if I consider NOT a solid angle, BUT a spin, which IS a slice ‘SEEN’ through the 1/3rd ‘D’ apertures between the diameters of the pi-1-sphere (cycle) or the ‘cuts on the 2-sphere’. We realize this ‘will be a slice’ with the exact parameters of angular momentum, and there will be 3 holes, hence only 3 spin angles, and they will be further on quantized – jumping from part of part of the whole:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.47.05

In the graph the proper description of Angular Momentum as a plane of Information, the minimal unit of perception of our Universe, proper of Relativity is more clear than the classic dynamic Time description as r x mv – both have their different uses/perspectives. H is the rod of informative measure of the Human electronic eye-mind, so small compared to c, the human rod measure of light space that the constant of geometry, r²/L² of Lobachevsky’s pan geometry becomes close to zero, creating our perceived Euclidean space, deformed to a hyperbolic geometry for smaller beings (Special Relativity, quantum physics) and to an elliptic geometry for larger gravitational scales (General Relativity)

Now, this is the modern ‘Hilbertian-Einsteinian’ description of angular momentum, just what we said it is, P, is the ‘cut’ on the n-sphere, x the radius, equivalent to P in ‘distance-motion’, and its product an amount mrv which is the spin. You can think of it as an information bit or an energy bite (space or moving perception) of the being.

Now those are the spins, quantized, and you can see there are 2 or 3 ‘cuts’ to perceive, with different orientations, and DO NOT come in bigger numbers. The maximal thing is this work of art, called ‘female and male spins’.

We won’t enter on this (-; just to mention the bidimensional nature of those spins (left graph) in the left side, which ARE the quanta of all information humans, electronic eye-beings, perceive about the world. And the obvious capacity to process and orientate they give as the ‘eyes’ of the atom, to each particle.

Moreover, they get ordered, orientated by the external magnetic field, the larger time-enclosure that orders from ∆, the ∆-1 quantum field. Now ask a physicist what is a spin, he will put a lot of formulae of abstract maths, which it will take you half a year to memorize, without understanding. Why? The idea that particles perceive is out of the ‘picture’.

Now the magnetic field, they like, as all heads turn to her the speaker in human groups, all atoms spin in tune, and we use it to control them, as speakers use the word nation and god. Same law of mass-control. I call it lanwave. A Wave ordered by a language of energy and information they speak. The magnetic field is the language of space that transcends atomic parts into the next scale; forming them; the electric field is the time force that put them in motion. That is how we transcend from quantum to our scale. The best at the job of ‘feeling’ magnetic lanwaves is the iron, and it becomes the top guy of the next scale. It forms perfect organized masses.

Once we are here, those motions are ‘activated’ by temperature, vibrational clocks of our molecules.

Temperature is the ‘electric field’ that moves us in the ∆-scale. What is the ‘spin’ for Molecules?. They use van der waals forces and ‘angles’, giving by slave atoms.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.22.44And the boss of those perceptive ones in our body is the nitrogen. It has 3 H systems to perceive.

Here you have an amino acid working his life around, with its oxygen legs kicking in and out water, its carbon body with lateral arms of many kinds and its nitrogen head.

You are made of a lot of those.

 I-LOGIC GEOMETRY. THE 5 ¬Æ POSTULATES.

Euclidean Geometry vs. Non-Euclidean, fractal points.

Space is in mathematics represented by geometry, which has 3 ages of evolution:

  • Pure bidimensional Space: Euclidean Geometry, only on the plane
  • SPACE-time: Analytic geometry mixed with algebra
  • 5D: Fractal spaces: Non-Euclidean Geometry.

Those are the 3 ages of Geometry studied in these posts, which represents an obvious ever closer ‘homeomorphism’ (correspondence) between the language and reality

(We won’t use many technical mathematical words of the 3rd age of formal mathematics, with the exception of topology, as the essential science of space and the basic concepts of time logic and 5D analysis.

Since it is a RULE of 5D sciences to ‘simplify’ jargons while making more ‘complex’, similar to 5D reality the laws of sciences – a process which all 3rd informative ages of systems subverts by making jargons more complex, at the same time that the science departs from reality, becoming a metalanguage. This is a process all too obvious in cosmological physics, which has blown up the ‘local’ models of entropy (thermodynamics) and Relativity (galactic light space-time) to become the ‘absolute new time arrow’ and absolute total space of all the scales of the Universe. LOL – how humans always blow up their finitesimal ego to the infinite – the harder they fall.

Here the trick is, due to the cumbersome mathematical crunching of Relativity (a conceptual simple theory but difficult to solve with non-lineal differential equations), and the complex maths of quantum physics (whose concepts are not so complex but appear so, due to the null understanding or rather anthropomorphic denial of its organic and logic properties), is to substitute all serious scientific, strict conceptual analysis of its truth, by mathematical jargons and computerised calculus that allow the scholar to pump up their pride, with jargons.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. So for example, the collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And this never will be accepted by anthropomorphic humans. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

In mathematics, the age of set theory and the Hilbert formalism, followed by the idealist ‘gothic’ german school, with its proverbial incapacity to ‘see reality’ (treated in the cultural parts of this blog), meant the abandon of the true concepts, points and numbers; hence the HALTING on the evolution of the concept of a point with parts, and the curved parallels of energy and information that cross them (1st and 2nd Non-Euclidean postulates), truncating the evolution of the discipline after the great insights of Lobachevski and Riemann.

And as everything else in the Universe, it represents the 3 dynamic ages of evolution of systems, for a pure ‘spatial state’ in this case (E-geometry) to a balanced analysis of both T and S together (analytic geometry which should properly be called geometric algebra), and finally to a full informative form with less relationship with reality, and old metalanguage. This is the phase of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

After that there are always two choices for a system, ±n, that is:

-I: to die away in the baroque form, and become a non growing excessively formal state of mathematics, which is what mathematics has become since set theory took over. Or:

+n: to evolve further into a whole by the proper fusion of all the other ages into a more complex fusion form. This final social evolution is I-logic geometry, the geometry of networks of non-euclidean fractal points across multiple planes of the 5th dimension.

In its origin, Mathematics, as a language that represented reality with simplified symbols, only numbers and points with no parts, had a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplified and integrated the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content.

But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we will propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of Entropy and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point. This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels.

Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye. That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of Entropy and information that defines them.

Thus to fully represent the Universe of the 5th dimension, of multiple vital spaces and cyclical times, we need to evolve our understanding of mathematics, away from the straight-jacket of excessive formalism and a snobbish pretention of absolute truth.

Instead we must return to its beginnings, following the dictum of Einstein: ‘Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild Western sciences from its foundations’.

But before we study the first age of mathematics, obviously we must do so with the reference of the higher learning of 5D fractal Non-AE points. So we must do a general introduction to the true structure of mathematical systems. As this will allow us to make in-depth comments as we survive the discoveries of the 3 ages of mathematics, and corrections, which should make sense of that mankind has discovered till this age.

We shall thus introduce the theoretical minimum of the 5 non I-logic postulates that structure the Universe of points-numbers. And then start thought he age of ‘Greek mathematics’ (it is the age dominant in space-plane geometry), the II Age of European Mathematics (Dominant in Analysis and mathematical physics, which is as always in all systems the classic most important age), the 3rd age of old-formal mathematics ( with its baroque, unneeded formalisms of set and categories) and its new toppings of topology, Non-E first insights and fractals and functionals (with wide projections unlike sets – have you seen a set of all sets around nature of lately (-:, in biology, geology, physics and quantum theory).

We won’t for mere humanism and self-respect deal with a part I practiced when young, I.A. information algorithms and Boolean algebras (digital thought), that is the birth of Artificial intelligence.

 

The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:gravitationalwavesbestintermediatespace_image002

In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

The human point of view: I = Eye + Wor(l)d

electronic_mind_clip_image002That all what you see is a construction of the mind is the main tenant of philosophy of knowledge, from Plato’s world of ideas to Descartes’ devil putting reality inside us, from Schopenhauer’s world ‘in the eye’ to Schrodinger’s cat.

We are an I=Eye+Wor(l)d, a mind of 2 languages, as the other languages of sensorial experience, touch, smell and taste are irrelevant. We can exist without them. We see and verbalize reality, converting ‘whatever is beyond’ in geometrical images with the eye and temporal chains with verbs of past, present and future.

At present, the I=Eye has been highly developed in science due to instruments, mechanisms made of metal, a better atom than our paltry 1-6-7-8, HCNO structures. So we have pictures of all kind of scales of reality, from the infinitesimal atom to the galaxy. Beyond those scales things become blurred. Yet curiously enough the parameters of atoms and galaxies in terms of energy and information are self-similar. Is this because each atom is a galaxy of a nano-universe, or because our Mind, who measures, gets an aberration of distance parallel in atoms and galaxies?

That the mind’s scalar and continuous distance from those 2 realities, might cause our perception to equalize forms of atoms and galaxies is a way of thought proper of our awareness that all what we see is information already ‘cooked’ by the mind, ‘deformed’ and ‘transmuted’ by the Maya of the senses.

We are not seeing the real Universe. We are a geometrical and verbal mind, which applies geometric and causal categories to interpret reality. And so all what we can talk is about the 3 dimensions of our spatial perception and the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future, explained by our verbs. Hence, the importance of evolving our mind languages to have a better mirror in the smaller scale of the brain, reflecting the entire Universe. But the linguistic Maya, the ‘a priori’ mind who perceives, the I=eye+wor(l)d will always be limiting our truths.

The 3 dimensions of space perceived mathematically and the 3 ages of time perceived verbally are thus the last components of reality, which reflect the paths and arrows of time deployed by each species of each scale:

– In time, we observe constantly forms being born, going through an energetic big-bang, growth, maturity and then a still, solid warped stage before death.

– In space, we see 3 topological regions that correspond to energetic, reproductive and informative functions.

The total Universe is the only entity that stores all the information about itself. We exist as a dialog between the image of the Universe of our eye and the verbal information we extract from it, our I.

Humanity lives in a light-space world which scientists measure with machines and artists with the linguistic mapping of our senses, created with our inner languages.

Scientists in that sense are creating a new Eye<=>Mind, the mind of machines that also measure space and time:

Mechanical Eye <=> Digital Thought.

Indeed, scientists are not discovering the absolute truth of reality but creating a more complex Linguistic World, a world of digital thoughts and images that future perceptive machines will use to control reality. And because that world of mathematical and instrumental perception has more information than the human I< =>Wor(l)d, on the long term A.I. robots might extinguish us, as superior minds/bodies. Of course, scientists do not understand this because they think the machine is an extension of their ego.

Ultimately we exist within our mind and so our truth is a subjective, human truth developed with our languages. We do not see the external world of quantum fluctuations but what our light/electronic mind creates, extracting only a part of the total reality to map visually the Universe, reduced to a light-space world. Our ego, our consciousness is and eye <=> Wor(l)d, a fractal space/time dialog between our informative mind, the wor(l)d and our energetic space, the eye:

‘I think and see therefore I exi=st’

So we are indeed a fractal equation/function of existence:

The Human Mind:  Sp (Eye) <=> Tƒ (Wor(l)d).

Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they move the mind. Stillness is indeed the nature of mind perception. Even if reality is a moving fractal soup, our eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when we blink our eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping our perception.

Thus, perception is also a stop and go process that focuses a still image through the senses and then processes that information into a thought, while the eye-senses are blinking, closed and the reproductive body moves slightly the eye-mind. In the human case that stop and go, perceive and move rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which we create a still, simultaneous mental image of the Universe. Each second our fractal, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical act of perception:

Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.

Truth is given by the languages of the mind. A truth is a mental/linguistic mirror of information within the mind that reflects the external universe.

Thus, unlike the naïve realism sponsored by physicists, a fundamental thesis of Systems sciences is to consider there is much more information in the Universe than the one we can perceive. Since each mind needs to select its information. Because each mind has a limited quantity of vital space, it can store only a limited quantity of linguistic ‘information’ about the cycles performed by other entities in the Universe, and so it selects only those pieces of energy and information that give an accurate depiction of the world in which the entity finds its energy and information and other self-similar species to reproduce and evolve socially. The rest of the Universe thus becomes a relative dark space.

Since the Universe is a game of entities of energy and information, relative ‘points of view’ that search for more energy and information to reproduce themselves and survive as self-similar ‘logic forms’, that game of survival has imposed limits to the information we perceive, maximizing information that ensures the reproductive and social games, the ultimate will of the Universe that ensures the ‘durability’ of each point of view, which will only exist beyond its ‘caducity date’, if it is able to repeat its energy and information into a self-similar being that continues the game of existence, once the original form is broken.

The 5th postulate combined with the analysis of the internal parts of a point and the trajectories of the cycles that the flows of energy and information between points follow, defines not only philosophical questions like perception and the nature of fractal information, but the fundamental causal arrow of time of the Universe: Energy->Information.

Since the flows of forces absorbed by the point create the ‘reality’ we see by constructing an image which is not there – the world as an ‘idea’ (Schopenhauer); that is the world-mind, the I=Eye+ wor(l)d we perceive, different from that of other species that perceive with other forces and minds.

Recap: The human mind, and probably all other minds/systems of information use 2 basic language of perception, a geometrical language able to perceive space and a logic language, able to perceive time. Humans perceive space with visual images and time with logic words. We are an I=eye+wor(l)d. Yet other species should use other versions of those 2 geometric/spatial and logic /temporal languages.

For example, the complexity of visual languages ranges from a simple light/dark, on/off switch in simple particles to the simple geometrical motions of particles, to the richness of visual perception in animal eyes. While the complexity of Logic chains of events ranges from simple Aristotelian chains, A->B, which define the simplest arrows of Time (feeding, where A is energy that becomes B, the food of the predator), performed by all entities, to complex social networks in which causality is multiple, as each informative ‘neuron’ of the network relates through its axons to all the other cells of the informative system.

761

In the graph an amino acid fish in which the elements of information, iteration and entry motion are performed by N, C and O molecules. They will form the triad of all biological ternary organisms at the bio-molecular level.

 

III. THE TOPOLOGY OF THE MIND: PANGEOMETRY

BEST 3 VARIATIONS

BIOLOGY_image002

In the graph, is  the informative center and it is a spherical topology. It is still bidimensional because the mind itself, the zero-point has externally zero dimensions. So only the external membrane is dimensional.

From the perspective of the relative flows of time from past to future, the Mind is the first of those and the last of them, the alpha and omega the beginning and end of time, where information collapses from the external sensorial membrane (first graph) to the future zero point last graph, if we were to use cones of world cycles.

We explained in the simplified lecture that introduced multiple space-time theory that the Universe is a holography of an informative bidimensional field and an energetic bidimensional field that created the 4 dimensions of reality.

This is the case of the simplest forms like light, which is merely a membrane with two perpendicular energetic and informative fields.

But complex ‘closed topological balls’ with 3 regions, an informative center joined to an informative spherical membrane and a Klein body of reproductive cycles between them, with attached toroid limbs, is better described as a series of bidimensional layers in motion which add the time-motion dimension and the 3rd dimension by accumulation of layers.

In those ‘complete’ st-points the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region, which uses the sensorial input of the informative membrane  to create a mapping of itself (homunculus) and the world (imprinted in the senses of the external membrane).

In metaphysics, which searches for the logic and geometric laws, derived from the 5 Non-Euclidean definitions, from where the arrows and wills of the organic Universe are deduced; a mind is understood as a fractal image, reflection of an internal body and an external Universe, which connects both regions of the st-point.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

 

The two language of the mind, its body and informative languages.

In a zero-point the membrane is the first mapping of the Universe, in its highest, ⊕-informative faster, language, and the intermediate body, which reproduces and maintains the system is mapped out, albeit in the lower ∑-language of the system.

A mind will constantly check both, the membrane and its sensorial image to which it is connected through a nervous/informative system and the inner body, to which is connected through a reproductive/energetic system.

So a human brain is connected to the inner world through the blood system and the external world through the membrane senses. It has two images of reality and it combines them both, word feelings and eye-images, to act with 2 purposes: to maximize the informative perception of the external world and the inner, reproductive and energetic feelings and pleasures of the Internal world.

This complex explanation of the human being, explored in more detail in other works, is reduced to a minimal skeleton, maintaining the scheme of wills and purposes, when we study the simplest forms of the Universe. And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture A,12 (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

Recap. The dimensions of the  informative center are the sum of the dimensions and information stored in the cycles of the reproductive body and the energetic membranes, whose senses map out the external Universe.

 II. PHYSICAL MINDS: SINGULARITIES

Physical particles. Boson Minds.

300px-PIA16695-BlackHole-Corona-20130227

In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=a mind’ A. Einstein

We added in italic the concepts of Multiple Spaces-Times equivalent to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure – an informative, mental action.

We consider that a mass or any particle of the Universe can measure space-time because it can perceive a minimal quantity of the gravitational or light forces that make up the 2 physical membranes of reality. Some particles exist only in one of those membranes (point-particles like quarks who exist only in the gravitational world or light which exists only in light-space). Other complementary entities, such as atoms co-exist in both membranes. All of them should be able to make relative, different measures from their P.O.V.s, which will allow them to act-react in their world but will differ from the relative measures of humans or machines, we call reality.

‘Naïve realism’ affirms that for example, the distance between you and me is exactly 2 meters, because an electromagnetic signal or rod measures it as 2 meters. This is not truth. Reality goes beyond what we see and measure with machines: The distance of 2 meters happens to be in light measures or light space.

But if we measure with feet as the Greeks did, 2 becomes 6. And if we do not measure in light-space the light we see, but in gravitational space, as Einstein proved it, the distance would be bigger, as light warps the more extended, non-Euclidean world of gravitation in which the membrane of light space-time we call reality floats. Thus, our light-world is a reduced version of the gravitational world: a simplified Euclidean surface, whose 3 coordinates, x, y and z are perpendicular and lineal as the 3 fields of light, the magnetic, electric and wave-field are.

We exist in a space-time membrane made of light, whose final structure is the 2.7 k basic light membrane emitted by gravitational black holes that becomes the background frame of reference of our light World, only a fractal membrane of the infinite Universe.

The Universe is more complex than our simplified, naïve sense of reality that thinks the space-time membrane of light that humans inhabit and see is all what there is to it. With the same reasoning, if we had not eyes to measure the light-universe, but merely noses to smell it as ants do, we would see even a more reduced world, as our pixel unit of reality would be a pheromonal atom. The mapping of reality by our mind would be shorter and so distances would be perceived as smaller, as fewer pixels would create our smelling mind.

How the process of gauging information takes place in the Universe? We can only hypothesize that perception is an inner quality of the motions of the Universe. In other words, a software image of reality, a fractal mirror made of forces is a whole, who perceives itself. So the electronic image of the Universe a human mind has ‘perceives in itself’; and as the image changes when we move the head, our ‘ego-self’ made of images and words seems to change.

So should happen in physical particles that focus the forces of the Universe. Yet if we observe externally the process, according to the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points we can describe objectively those events of absorption of energetic forces by cyclical particles (charges and masses) as topologic transformations of external, lineal forces of energy into cyclical motions.

Those cyclical motions finally reach the toroid center of the particle, a double ring or singularity of increasing height, which should perceive the ‘translation’ of the information carried by those forces. Then those forces are transformed again into flows of energy and expelled back to the Universe, as magnetic flows in atoms or gravitational dark energy in black holes.

In most particles, it all starts in a surface of energy that curves itself into cyclical motions, which become smaller, faster and reproduce into faster fractal cycles, till reaching the center. Yet those forces, will never reach as quantum physicists believe the central point of infinity; because the cycle will fractalize into new cycles moving upwards in the informative dimension of height (Belgrami semi-sphere depicted in the graph of the previous paragraph) till it becomes expelled upwards through the poles, as a thin line of forces. And so the center of a fractal point, where physics find infinity remain silent, still virtual images, the perceptive eye of the hurricane or the black hole:

A flow of forces converges toward the event horizon or external membrane of the point (the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole or the Bohr Radius of the atom).

Beyond this membrane, the flow of forces starts a process of creative, formal warping, as it rotates at increasing speed and also increases its frequency (height dimension), in each cycle. Because a bidimensional vortex stores more information than a lineal frequency, as it adds a new dimension of form, those forces acquire information. So we observe a bidimensional, cyclical wave of high frequency/informative mass that accelerates toward the center, becoming a convex topology, which the equations of black holes show, as the dimension of space becomes a high temporal dimension.

And finally the left-overs of the force – once a mirror-image is formed inside the toroid center of the particle, called in topology a Belgrami cone – are shot up through the poles as a magnetic flow in charges or a flow of dark energy in masses, invisible to us, but observed in quasars. Those flows of magnetism or dark energy of maximal speed and minimal form, once again will start a cycle of information, warping again into light under c-speed. So galactic black holes emit dark energy that becomes a seminal flow of protonic matter, which might give birth to a new galaxy, as it is observed in the galaxy M83.

Recap: A dynamic analysis shows that most events of physics are transformations of lineal forces back and forth into cyclical motions (particles and charges), which can be described as topological transformation between toroid and spherical or planar geometries.

The many worlds=minds interpretation of reality.

All fractal points are Galilean paradoxes that perceive and act with a will defined by their desire to survive, absorbing energy and information from their environment.

Tƒ that aim the mind creates a ‘subjective world image’ of reality tailored to achieve its arrows of time; while the rest of reality is a relative ‘dark space and dark matter’ of other cat alleys and networks we are not interested on. Thus we exist in a single fractal universe of infinite worlds, which are mirror-image of that single Universe.

The difference with the quantum interpretation of multiple Universes is clear: now the ‘quantum Universes’ co-exist as mental world in the same single reality.

Such paradox explains the self-centered behavior of all systems that fix reality into form. The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated.

Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. The resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces.

They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms.

Recap. Reality is a game of mental worlds of information. But we need to translate those languages to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speaks so few codes properly and thinks the rest of the intelligent Universe is mute.

The speeds of time: different mind rhythms.

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. We do not see them in stones and plant, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms those similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge and mind, a different speed of times or capacity to act-react in the Universe. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on fractal, gravitational space.

Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a proof of our limited intelligence and memorial detail.

Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon, that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large with Nature.

 Recap. When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

The harmonies of living points: Chip paradox.

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a planetary core crystal might form an image-thought each day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 1010 years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle.

This is the new trend in Astrophysics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon Sp (proton) <->Tƒ (neutron) cycle, as nucleons absorb pions, transforming into each other so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state.

The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet when we ‘enlarge’ the image of a non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of fractal information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the fractal law that defines transversal, explosive waves, Sp/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different fractal rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes.

A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles:

A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second. Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer.

While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And man, an informative species seems so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth.

The main law of existence is the balance between space and time, SxT=K. As we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths.

Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x Sp, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than an elephant but her heart beats faster. That faster perception speed also prevents small species to become extinct in the same ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual fractal åctions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s fractal neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more fractal åctions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= ExI balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= ExI is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for gases: P(t)  xV(Sp)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as Sp/I or I/Sp processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances, processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/Sp, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. On the other hand, in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form.

Yet since the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. 

Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe.

The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe.

So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, in as much as they reflect a single Universe, the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; since worlds are multiple, fractal, diffeomorphic. 

So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each fractal being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different worlds or ecosystems in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are fractal nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are fractal knots of light perception. Ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. Different beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing st-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

– Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

– Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

– Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc.).

– Gravitational forces of reduced size create words of galactic size, which might be perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the fractal mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity.

Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. It means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

Reality is a game of Russian dolls in which each bigger Doll /World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world, which encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants and so on.

Recap. Each species has a rhythm of times. Slow species are perceived as dead space by faster species. We think plants do not perceive because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves.

VORTICES OF TEMPORAL INFORMATION

The 0th isomorphism studies the Œ-points in a geometric way, without its algebraic description, which is given by the Fractal Generator (1st isomorphism).

Thus the Œ-isomorphism considers the self-centered, mental, linguistic analysis of any given entity, which in the case of physics, we shall agree on this with Galileo, is mathematical. That is, the minds of the physical systems that enact the actions of the physical Universe must be mathematically oriented, because the law of motions and actions of physical systems are better expressed in mathematical form.

The second element of the œ isomorphism is the study of the membrane+ point-particle or mind that structures the superorganisms of reality, in the physical case it implies the study of the 3 fundamental œ points of the 3 scales of Nature, the œ-point of electromagnetic systems (the photon), the œ-point of thermodynamic systems, the electron, and the œ-point of gravitational systems, the quark, in the 3 scales of relative growth of those systems.

The theme being so extensive, we shall merely introduce two elements of it, the non-Euclidean geometry of the 5th dimension and the unification equation of charges and masses, the 2 time vortices of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 quantum and gravitational scales. Why if those 3 relative scalar points are similar we do not perceive them as such? There is one objective reason: fractals are similar in each scale, not equal, so a atom is not a galaxy but similar to it in 5D metric. And a subjective unrecognised one – human perspective distorts what we perceive from upper scales – being 96% invisible dark matter, and from lower scales, much more as the faster time cycles gather far more information from our slower point of view, seeing entire time cycles as spatial drawings.

Unlike other sciences, where the human observer does not interfere with the observable, neither thinks his interference matters, in physical systems, specially those far removed from humans – quantum and relativity, the human observer does change the observable, and on top of that, it does NOT recognize this is ‘his problem’, not the problem of the observable it destroys. In brief, this ‘quantum paradox’, only compares to the ‘anti-quantum paradox’ of social sciences, which is its inverse. There the observer is so small that the observable, the people-castes on power, interfere with him, preventing true social sciences to develop objectively, as the observable will kill the observer if he tries to say the truth about military or financial dictatorships. And yet, the observable will think is the fault of the social scientist to tell the truth. For example, Heisenberg and Bohr affirmed that because we could not distinguish particles it was the fault of particles that became ‘indistinguishable’.

For that reason we bring in the study of the Œ-points of physics (the observable, photons, fermions, crystals and black holes that manage the 4 scales of physical systems from a Tƒ-informative, particle point of view) also an analysis of the observer, the quantum physicist or rather human ‘ego-centered’ believer, to fully clarify what should be objective science, and its methods of truth that we resume in a ‘logic formula’” Œ=ESc³, each letter signifying a key measure of truth of objective science

1. The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.

The reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science, which considers the existence of a living Universe gifted both with perceptive and organic qualities. So Plato said ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’. Such Universe is made of infinite broken points or monads, each one hosting a different world view, each one a mirror of a larger unknown single Universe, whose image is stored in the mind of each ‘point of view’ or entity of the Universe; which also applies to the multiple points of view of human beings and its languages of perception, all of which are valid to make a mapping mirror of reality – so Upanishads would say ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

It is the most profound view– older in time, as it can be dated to the first philosopher of science, Plato with the myth of the cave and the first Logician, Aristotle, in his book Organon, in the western decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain both all possible minds of the Universe and ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’ – all the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of human knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal and logic languages, but also the human senses and artistic forms.

In terms of time motions, is an organic theory, which defines time as changes and explores multiple changes, both in motions of space, studied by physics and changes of information, in time, or evolution studied by biology. So Aristotle recognised 6 motions, generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction, which together form the world cycle of existence of any physical being. While in the east, those motions were reduced to changes of yang-energy and yin-information and its ∞ combinations.

– The reductionist view of mechanicist, XVII c. ‘deist’ physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems; it only accepts a language of description, abstract mathematics; only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space or ‘locomotion’; and denies organic self-sufficient processes to matter modelled as a mechanism, hence in need of a creative force or God, which the founding fathers of physics, pious believers in Yhwh, thought to be the biblical God.

And yet surprisingly enough this mechanist, deist, mathematical view pretends with those very limited ‘elements’ to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge. Such reductionist theory is called Τ.O.E. and really only deals with a faulty attempt to unify the forces or ‘locomotions’ of the Universe –  translations in space, ignoring all other motions=changes of time and information, in biological and creative and extinctive processes.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

Multiple languages describe reality. We need to evolve them.

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like Newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

œ-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

So the human mind-language is a mapping made with light of the Universe,and uses the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light to simplify all the information of reality:

MOMENTU

In the graph, we see how light constructs our view with 3 simple lineal motions, the electric, magnetic and c-speed axis, reason why we see light as a fixed space (relativity and constancy of c-speed). Yet other beings can map out reality with other pixels, atomic smells, gravitational forces, digital numbers. So we need to expand our notions of mathematical points, lines and planes, as they might be constructed with different pixels.

What all those mappings of reality will have then in common will be not linguistic units (call it numbers, words, atoms, colours, etc.) but the ‘reference of all of them’, which is the Universe itself, the whole, and its fundamental components, which are spatial energetic motions, and cyclical, temporal forms of information, stored in their cyclical clocks.

We are still talking of 2 ‘elements’, which can be well-defined geometrically, but also mapped out with other languages. As they are richer in meaning. For example, motion in physics is associated to open lines – the shortest distance between two points, with entropy an expansive motion, with energy, a measure of motion along the axis of application of a force. And form, information, is associated to clocks, which carry it in the frequency and form of its cycles, to vortices of masses and charges, which act as accelerated inward clocks of Nature.

So it is better to start a description of the Universe, departing of the ‘elements’ of the Universe, in its essential duality, cyclical time clocks of information and lineal motions of entropic energy, and then establish a logic, formal equation that relates both and defines all systems as made of those 2 components:

‘All what exists is a system made of quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information that transform each other ad eternal: Spe<=>Τiƒ’

And then consider that each mind and language will try to mirror this Universal grammar, above each world view, with more or less focus and distortion. So verbal systems tend to have a Grammar of subject (information) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (energy of subject), to mirror those ternary systems, and euclidean light space mathematics will also use a geometric 3 dimensional view, where length corresponds to the speed-reproduction of the wave, height to the electric-informative field, and width, to the magnetic energetic field, or a 3 algebraic equation, G(x) operandi F(Y), akin to the ternary structure of words. And colours will be 3, blue associated to information, red to energy and green to reproductive combinations.

So the philosopher of science, or rather of languages of knowledge has a much wider view of reality, than the physicist, which is a believer in mathematics only, as the generator element of reality that comes even above or at the same level than the Universe. In the next graph we see that duality: on the left Mr. Penrose’s pythagorean view that consider the mind of man that ‘imagines’ mathematics, the language and the Universe in equal footing, interacting together. It is an anthropomorphic, arrogant view. In philosophy of science, all languages are lesser mirrors that cannot perceive the entire Universe. So the causality is far less equalitarian. Τhere is out there a Universe, which hosts all the information about itself (Haldane), and a series of beings within it, mirroring with different languages that Universe, among which humans exist with its varieties, of which we do acknowledge mathematics and logic, of space and time, to be the best mirrors, but not perfect enough.

So our first task is to improve both mirrors, by looking at the more complex structure of fractal space, and the more complex causality of cyclical time, the primary elements of the Universe, incorporating those discoveries to the grammar of mathematics, giving birth to i-logic mathematics, the formalism of all systems.

 

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

Now it is important to notice that those are in the Universal non-human language of measures (Planck units for obvious reasons ay physicist would explain), the parameters of lineal time, T, length in space, and hence those are parameters of area, of the geometry of human beings both in physics and mathematics:

humaneyebased

The Human eye-world: its h-informative and c-speed/motion Tƒ x Sp parameters and mass-charge curvatures.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5th dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Euclidean world.

Mass, Charge and Temperature in Planck’s units

In the case of the unification of scales as time vortices of accelerated time speed, we have shown the simplest one. I have in my archives of 30 years of personal research similar works using 5 other formalisms, Poisson, Lagrange, Einstein, Heaviside and one which might seem trivial, but is so simple we shall bring it also in this introduction: Planck’s numbers. As in both, we obtain the value of Mass and Charge directly from the fundamental constants of the Universe:

Planck Mass: Mp: √hc/G

Electric charge Qp: √hc/ke

It is a beautiful equation because of its simplicity and profundity.

Now the fundamental equation of the Universe is Tƒ x Sp = ∆ and here we can reduce indeed the 4 fundamental constants of the Universe, c, h, G and Eo to that equation:

Sp (c) x Tiƒ (h) / ∆+1 G = ∆+1 Mass

Sp (c ) x tiƒ (h) /∆-1 Eo= ∆-1 Charge

Since speed-motion of light is the unit of spatial motion in the Universe, and h-planck of Form, of time cycles and bits of information, reason why it is a quantised formula.

Thus those two vortices of time, Masses and charges, are the product of the quanta of space and motion and the quanta of time and information of our Universe below and above us, which also means that G and Eo, are the two different curvatures.

it is interesting to see that the minimal charge unit makes 11 electrons roughly which we can take as the natural decametric unit of a charge with an organic motion as a flow of charge. Mass though is much larger as it corresponds to a larger scale of the 5th dimension.

The relationship between ∆+1/∆-1 constants, G/Eo is therefore another constant deduced from those to fully grasp how closely related those vortices are.

Many other constants like ∆µ and the fine structure constant are immediately understood as they can be deduced from those ones.

Thus we are in a world with two limits one of speed-motion and one minimal quanta of information, h and those are the 2 elements the Universe uses to evolve its beings.

What this means will be clear when we explore with more depth the ‘perceptive actions’ of those time vortices, of which our minds are doing with the pan geometry of Lobachevski in the 5th and most important isomorphism. In essence, h is our constant of perception as electronic beings and c, the volume-speed an electronic/gravitational mind can reach; being therefore G/ke, the ratio the system absorbs the energy-information of the Universe in its purest scale of space-time.

Now we shall latter consider the meaning of the Planck units which are far more objective than human units, where c is the speed of space, instead of length, h the quantum of information and time (angular momentum) better than lineal time duration and G and K the relative metric of the 5th dimensional scales, to which we must add the Boltzmann constant for the  Thermodynamic states, and construct with them, an objective analysis of physical 5D. Enough said now to introduce the main time clocks of the 5D Universe.

Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula, than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon. This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultra-dense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of self-repetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyper-Universe.

unification

 In the graph, the co-invariance of the 5th dimension between size in space and time-speed such us:  Sp x Tƒ = ∆±∞, that is the faster clocks of time run the smaller the entity is, allows to unify the scale of charges and masses at the atomic and galactic scale. The Unification of forces thus is a cyclical equation o the 5th dimension, latter studied in detail, not a lineal equation of temperatures.

Yet self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology is false. Quantum cosmologists consider ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales. Because of the corrections, higher complexity and general ignorance of the gravito-magnetic formalism, here we shall only consider the case of the light-membrane.

Recap: the 2nd fundamental duality of the Universe is its structure in 2 different branes, planes or scales of space-time: the electromagnetic space and the gravitational space, which show different proportions of energy and information and yet, because of the self-similarity of all those branes can be easily unified as 2 self-similar forces acting in 2 different scales.

 

II. BIOLOGICAL MINDS

(To be completed – as those minds are recognised, we shall given the load of work, leave this part in blank)

III. SOCIAL MINDS:

ART, THE MINDS OF CIVILIZATIONS.

ethicsandaesthetics

“Human aesthetics correspond to human proportions, human ethics to the laws of social love, which translate to the Wor(l)d languages the biological laws of Eusocial evolution that define the survival of species”

The mind of the super-organisms of history.

The mind of any superorganism of history are the mind memes, neuronal networks that memorize and learn superstructures of ideas that motivate humans to act and replicate a certain superorganism of history, either a nation or a civilization based in metal or life meme, often both. This trove of instruments and ideologies that make us replicate it, becomes extrenmely complex during the industrial revolution as the forms to replicate ideas, ideologies, instruments and other memes multiply and diversify. In that sense, we shall reduce the concept of culture to the human or biological memes that stream out of the human mind, as opposed to instruments made with materials alien to our mind. In plain sense, that higher mind would be made of our natural time-language of verbal words and our visual eyes, expressed in plastic arts. Literature and painting, legal words and housing, and similar ‘natural goods’ form the skeleton of such life-based cultures.

While verbal art, as the mind of civilisations is far more important,

Yet as we create the metal-earth, the superorganisms of metal and machines that will soon substitute us, we have transfered the forms of ‘life’ into machines and that has influenced enormously art, even art based in human forms which tend to degenerate into simpler forms of iron and gold.  In that regard the concept of art and culture has spread beyond the limits of a life-based civilization, essentially all before the XVIII century, when even in economy the ‘physiocrats considered the goods of the land the wealth of nations.

What is art? The visual mind of history.

Today the concept of art has expanded well beyond the classic meaning of art in history, which will be the concept used in this pages, that relates art and bio-history. This extension of the classic concept of art has happened mainly because today art works are basically products on sale, and so they have acquired values and definitions proper of the economic world, very different from the spiritual definitions that were used to describe art, when it was not considered a market-product, but the fundamental form of knowledge of mankind. Hence a “sacred” endeavor. Since knowledge was considered to be the highest quality of man, the quality which connected us with “God” and his laws of universal creation (either a personal being, as in most western religions, or an impersonal principle as in science and Eastern philosophies).

This second definition is what interests us here: art is a form of knowledge related to the more complex senses of the human mind, the word and the sight. If we define the human mind as a dual system of perception based on the senses of sight and sound perception, we could sum up our mental essence in a single sentence:

I think words and I see images therefore I am a human mind.

A work of artistic knowledge could then be defined as a form of sound perception (literary art, music) or visual perception (architecture, sculpture, painting), translated from the mind into an external medium. However since the process of creation of words and images by the human mind is constant, art was considered to be only those superior acts of mental perception that “evolved” the human mind, beyond its natural level of perception and creativity.

We only perceive a partial map of the Universe

Your mind creates constantly the reality you perceive. Our mind is not the real Universe, but the sounds and images we collect from it. To differentiate both we will call the vision of the Universe that humans have, thanks to their senses and minds, the “wor[l]d”. A World is a Mental world constructed observing the Universe with a language of time, n the case of man, Words, and a language of space, in the case of man, images. The mental world of man, is different from the mental world of other species which do not use words to explain temporally reality. For example machines use numbers to explain reality, dogs seems to use smells, as ants do… The Universe is the total reality, the world is the linguistic mirror that a mind of any perceptive species use to describe reality. To differentiate all those other maps of realities, made with smells such as those of dogs or ants, from the world made by man with words, and eyes, we call the World of Man, the Wor[l]d (world=word). Since it is a World in which our temporal perception of change, and the laws of survival and extinction that cause such change, takes place through words, that value reality.

I think therefore I am, define essentially man and only man as a word-speaking species Temporal words, are the particular linguistic mind of mankind. We could say that all humans are artists of the Wor[l]d, since all humans see and understand with words the Universe. What an artist does, however, is to go beyond that common wor[l]d, the biological wor[l]d of our senses, to stretch the limits of perception of human words and sight. Art in such a classic sense, adopted here, is the creation and evolution of the human mind made of images and verbal thought. I see and think therefore I am defines Man. I see more, I think more therefore I am an artist defines an artist as a more complex human mind.

That perception is evolved by the artist’s imagination into new forms, which return from the mind into reality in the shape of an artistic form, a “Work of Art”. A new verbal or visual form, becomes “real”, thanks to the use of certain materials, able to conform easily to the will and imagination of the artist, to become a work of art. Wood, stone, paint, metal, paper, allow the forms the artist has elaborated in his mind to become real, to become art. Thus, the artist is a sensitive man who “thinks more and sees more” and expresses his higher mental sensibility through his works of art. Such a theory of art developed by the Greeks and the Italian Renaissance, makes art a sacred endeavor, since art tries to expand the limits of human sensorial perception, in his perennial search for the truth and the essence of the Universe.

Out of all the human senses, why is it we highlight visual and verbal perception as the origin of art? In biological terms the answer is simple. Sound and sight offer much more information to the human mind than the other senses of touch, taste and smell do. Since the creation of art requires an initially rich sensorial evidence, only those senses can provide the perceptive material needed to create complex works of art. Art is therefore, first the evolution of our linguistic, verbal and visual perception of reality, and only in a secondary level, a product, a work of art for sale in the market.

The former explains why the Greeks considered philosophers, that only talked, and had no products on sale, the highest artists. Since they could combine words -the second level of the mind, that comments on what the sight sees- with such a beautiful logic, as to create new “wor[l]ds”, new linguistic images of reality, only with the power of the mind.

Images and words are the languages of creation of the human mind. They are like mirrors which show the Universe. However the mirror is not the Universe in itself, just an image of it. A linguistic mirror of reality. What you see is not reality, just the creation of your mind.

But all human minds have a genetic, basic way of creating the wor[l]d of sound as images, as all dogs smell and create a world of smells that probably is similar. What differences the artist is its capacity to distort, in several possible ways -what we call artistic styles- that basic biological mirror. He will be a verbal artist, when he makes descriptive models of the Universe with words. He will be a visual artist, when he creates sight-based models of that Universe.

Word Art and Sight Art. The eye-word, preceptor of space and time

It follows that there are two basic forms of “mind art”; Word and sound arts: music, and literature of any gender. And visual arts, architecture, painting, sculpture.

Why are images, and words the main sensorial languages of man? The answer is rather simple. We exist in time and space, the two parameters which define all species of the Universe. We therefore need to exist, survive and interpret such a Universe, a spatial and a temporal sense. The eye scans space. It is our spatial sense.The word remembers events in time. It is our temporal sense. So the eye-word are the human senses of perception of space and time, the main parameters of the Universe. This position places a special importance on the “higher arts”. It gives them a “sacred” meaning, since they deal with the very essence of mankind’s intelligence, our “soul,” which is our consciousness of space and time, of the Universe. The difference between both arts is in the senses which control the creation of the art form. Visual arts depend on spatial perception, through eye-images. Word art is “temporal art”, since man uses words and verbs to measure and explain events which happen in time. Verbs are the “temporal memory of man”, the “scanner of time” of the human mind.

We conclude that art is the highest expression of the human mind, in as much as it takes the mind of man into further evolution beyond its biological limits. The visual artist is the person able to see more and, with a higher sight, he is able to create images in two dimensions (painting) or 3 dimensions (architecture and sculpture). On the other hand, writers and musicians are able to think better in sounds; either in the simplified language of 8 sounds (music) or the more complex language of 24 sounds (words). They are able to explain emotions, sensations and temporal events with more complexity than ordinary people can, and with a higher sense of harmony, according to the natural laws of the Universe.

Mind-art, art of the human senses of space and time, the eye and the word, is clearly the highest level of knowledge man reaches about the Universe by his own linguistic means, with his soul-mind. In this manner, the wor[l]d becomes our soul-mind, the linguistic mirror that words and images craft on the Universe of atomic energy and information.

Even though man has 5 sensorial outlets to the Universe, it is important to distinguish between our “Energy senses” and “Informative senses”. The former might also evolve and create human goods to satisfy our perception (gastronomy, perfumes), but these can hardly inform us about the Universe, since their physiology allows them to accumulate only a small quantity of information. So they give way to simple sensorial objects. The Informative senses of the mind, eyes and words, accumulate thousands of times more information than the lower senses do. So they give birth to much more complex works of art. For that reason those works which relate to the higher senses of man are considered to be the classic arts in History.

However, in the present market-oriented society, the word “art” has been devaluated to allow the sale of many products which traders promote as art when they are mere crafts that do not evolve the human mind. This has an economic reason behind it; “a single genius is a single sale”. It is difficult to find enough truly creative works of art to invade the world market. Therefore the idea of converting any object into art and use the prestige of art to market industrial products, has expanded the notion of art beyond the products of the mind into many other things, from clothing to gastronomy, from images taken by machines to industrial design, of minimal creative content.

Man has existed for 150.000 years and he always considered art a sacred endeavor, and art works the most perfect or innovative forms perceived and recreated by the higher senses of the mind; words and images. Thus only products of “the eye-wor[l]d”, in its classical manifestations: literature, poetry, drama, prose, musical sounds, painting, sculpture and architecture, are considered art in this web. They are the seven arts of classical Greece, which the seven muses embodied.

The lower senses of man, those which have a limited perception of reality, (taste, touch, smell) blurred by the lack of distinct and clear information, create what we might call at best, lower art, forms of Human Goods, that should be promoted and reproduced as much as possible since they are truly the real wealth of nations, the goods mankind needs to survive: gastronomy, sex, textiles, perfumes… Yet precisely for that reason they cannot be unique, or special of a certain human mind, but common and available to all men, in a healthy body of history.

3-ages-of-art

The style of an artist, and the style of a society.

The present earth is changing from a historic ecosystem of human social organisms based in human beings, human goods, and human art into a single ecosystem ruled by metal organisms, networks, and financial systems, that we might call the metal-earth.

The main effect of that change is the increasing obsolescence of human art and human minds, submissive today to the industrial design of software for thinking machines.

However in the past, in the ecosystems-organisms of history that we have called nations and civilizations, words, legal systems and art were far more important, because they were the informative networks of societies. Verbal and visual knowledge and Art were the mind of civilizations as historic organisms, organized by legal information, and religion.

And so art, as the social networks of information of civilizations, was not so much an individual phenomena, but a collective phenomena. And the artist felt himself with a social role, as the neuronal cells, the informative organs of his society. It was for that reason the art of any artist was basically similar, to the art of all other artists of its society. It was “style-art”, because the style, was the collective message of a civilization. Today however, because civilizations are no longer ruled by human minds, but by networks of financial information, by company-mothers and its lobbies, by networks of metal-minds that produce information in industrial processes, the artist no longer has a social role of relevance. So he is free of any collective style. The style that controls ideas of artists, exists however in radios, televisions, internets, and all other forms of industrial information. A style which is controlled, and tailored to produce the basic message of industrial societies: men have as only purpose to work=reproduce machines, and test=consume them. Of course this message is presented with al the rhetoric of beauty, and freedom necessary to hide the fact, that work and consume are not acts that necessarily develop and increase the human sensorial Freedom, but basically evolve and multiply machines. Yet the message has reached so much sophistication, that most human beings today, believe that to be a worker and a consumer is the paramount Freedom of mankind; while to evolve human senses, and enjoy Human Goods, and the pleasures of human existence   is either a “sin”, an act of “laziness”, and “weakness” and a “lost of time”. The fact is that all top predators in the Universe, exist to be lazy, lions of the savanna, enjoying the basic pleasures of his organism, to reproduce (sex-love), to feed energy [food, movement], and to receive its natural information (verbal thought and visual beauty in the human case). That is, the ideals of society before the industrial revolution – the ideals of Renaissance, and the aristocracy, top predator caste of that age. And vice versa, and ideal world dedicated to the freedoms of machines, will imply that men-slaves of machines would dedicate their time to the reproduction of machines (work) its evolution (industrial research) and its vitalization as species in movement (consume of machines that vitalize their existence).

So it is evident that the Freedom of the market, the Freedom of the economy, is the Freedom of machines and its company-mothers. While the biological Freedom of the citizen, of the human being, were the ideals expressed by the art styles  of historic civilizations. Those facts have of course enormous historic relevance, and explain why under such brain-washing propaganda, the classic historic, social, religious art and his aesthetic and ethic ideas, clash so deeply with modern ideologies of economical men and yet they were accepted and enjoyed by the citizens of Historic civilizations. They found in the social ideas of religious art, and the sensorial ideals of individual art, the pursuit of their self-realization as individual, biological human beings, and as part of a macro-social organism, a culture, or civilization, that social art harmonized, as nervous messages harmonize social cells in a body.

In all those cultures art was sacred, art was considered the informative network of the Historic organism. Art caused the evolution of the collective human mind. Art was the mind of civilizations, and acted in the social historic organism, as the nervous networks act in the human organism.

Art the informative mind of the civilizations. The canon of ethics and aestehtics

3agesart

Since we have defined human art, as the visual and verbal perception olf space and time by the human ind, it fllows that collectiv e art was also visal and verbla rt, of colletive nature. And that collective nature imposed upon social art, two socila concepts: ethics and aesthetics of human nature. So classic art always had two basic forms, social ethic art, and individual aesthetic art, and two canons, moral, and beauty, carried by the word, and the eye of the human artist.

Today, even artists find those ideals, something of the past, because the artist today is not the valuator of reality, and has no ethic role. He does not educate the rest of the cells of society. So sacred art, religious art (which tried to create a social, harmonic morality among the different cells of society), even legal thought, has declined. Of course this has given individual Freedom to artists, to reflect their individual personality since nobody cares really anymore for what we, the artists, neurons of humanity, have to say.

Yet for most of history, Art has been a social phenomena, since men, lived in a social organism. The artist lived within a society. His ideas were similar to those of other artists of that society, fruit of customs and learning processes within that society. And so, the information that the mental cells of a civilization developed (the artistic information of a culture) was similar in most of the artists of a civilization. Styles in art gathered those similar mind-wor[l]ds, coming from people living in the same place, at the same time, as neurons work in the same manner, in the same organisms.

Individual art, the genius… and its relationship with social art

The style of an artist, is the peculiar way in which the mind of the artist, transforms the biological “Wor[l]d” of perception, that all humans have in common; the sounds and image we perceive as the Universe. While most people see reality under those biological limits, the artist goes beyond the subjective eye-Wor[l]d of the human species, and adds certain personal subjective changes to those images and words. This is the artist’s style.

The artist with his style goes beyond the “common way of perceiving reality”, and shows those other possible Worlds, that maybe some other species in some far away planet perceive directly (imagine a world where eyes see with the colors of a fauvist painter).

Still in the Earth, men see reality in a certain manner, and only artists are able to break with those conventions of the mind. Such individual artists are rightly called genius, since they create an entire new way of perception. When such new way of perception is meaningful, and harmonic, and can be understood at least partially by the audience, we have found an original artist.

Yet, in as much as men belong to social organisms, where they communicate in-form-ation to other human “cells” of the social organism, even individual genius, and its perception of reality, reproduces into works of art, that transmit the information to other “neurons” of the social organisms. In this manner, styles are transmitted, and create “schools” of art where many similar artist display the same style.

If the individual artist expresses its mind experience through its personal art, we can say that the society expresses its collective mind experience through schools of art.

If individual art is the evolution of the mental senses of the artist towards regions never explored by the common human mind, the style-art is the evolution of the collective mind of civilizations. It reflects the social mental state, of such civilization (as individual art reflects the mental state of the individual artist). In that sense, art becomes the collective mind of a civilization.

It is then clear that in classic history the role of artists was indeed sacred, fundamental, because verbal and visual artists, were in charge of recreating a Wor[l]d pleasant to man, where human social cells were in harmony, and shared as cells in any organism do, their vital information and energy. Ethic priests ruled the verbal minds of people with messages of love and ethics. Artists created beautiful environments, well constructed cities. Energy workers (farmers) fed the cells of the organisms. Literature educated the feelings of people, allowing bondage among individuals, at several levels (love, family, citizenship, religion). There was therefore a clear idea of what a social nation was, and what artists had to do in such society. That is why artists tried to find “canons” of beauty, that people would imitate, as role models.

The canons in classic art. What are ethics and aesthetics?

We can now understand the concept of a canon, both in verbal art (canon of ethics) and in visual art (canon of beauty). Today in individual art, when art is no longer the mind of civilizations, but science is, canons do not matter, but in the past, when art guided cultures, and took care of its survival and welfare, it was necessary and fundamental.

There was a canon of beauty in space, that had as element of reference the human form. Since we are humans, and we were top predators of the Earth, as all top predators do, we designed a Wor[l]d to our image and resemblance. So spatial arts, had as canon of beauty the proportions of human beings, and in its most beautiful creations (Greek, Italian art), that canon was respected, to create an environment in which man felt happy, in harmony with his surroundings, and dedicated to the pursuit of sensorial pleasure. This is the case of Greek and Renaissance sculpture and architecture.

There was also a canon of beauty in time, defined by the biological language of measure of time, that mankind uses: verbal thought.

How can we define beauty on time? It is self-evident, that if you ask anyone, what he would want to happen in time, he would say, “I want to survive”. So survival is indeed, the canon of beauty in time. And survival has in social thought a name: Ethics. Ethic societies that promote peace, and abhor war, do not die away. Societies that create systematically weapons end in civil wars, or in national wars. Thus, the people that were considered great artists of verbal thought in the past, were the prophets and writers that praised peace, and with poetic parables, preached the well being and harmony among human beings. Philosophy and religion were considered the highest forms of verbal thought. This, as we said no longer holds, since we are no longer ruled by words, but by numbers, by men, but by machines and prices. But we cannot ignore the fact that ethics and religious thought have controlled mankind. And the great artists of the word have been those prophets such as Jesus and Buddha, that talked against weapons and money, and praised love, and human senses. The artist is indeed the prophet, not the church, or the latter commentator. The master of the Word is Jesus, that defends a prostitute, and foresees that those “who kill by the sword, will die by the sword”, not the Catholic Church or Luther, and Calvin that acceptmoney and war, and repress sensorial love.

The quality of verbal art

As a consequence of the biological nature of languages, we cannot regard any longer verbal art, as a product, or a secondary commodity. “Literature for the sake of aesthetics; art for the sake of art” is far less relevant than “sacred art”, literature with an educational mission, either social literature and philosophy, or sensorial literature (fiction), which educates the senses and feelings of the people. There are qualities in the forms of literature, because literature has a function. Literature is not useless entertainment. Verbal Art is the biological language of mankind, and our societies. Its function is to mirror reality and explain the universe to man, from our own point of view, with the aim of helping human societies to survive. This means that we can qualify the quality of literature, according to such function.

It will be good literature, either legal, religious, fiction or logic literary art, a verbal construction that through its reading and practice, improves the capacity of an individual to behave ethically and in harmony with the other members of his society. It will be bad art, those literary and verbal forms that harm the harmony of societies.

So “War and Peace” is good art. So it is the “bill of rights” or the “Gospel”. They try to give the reader an “ethic sense of life” that favors peace over war; human rights over the rights of machines; and love and poverty, and despise for money and war, (the message of the gospel). Since history proves that those attitudes are positive for the survival of the individuals of society. On the other hand bad verbal art, is that art, which harms the energy and information of civilizations, pushing individuals against each other.

A typical script made in Hollywood that makes an apology of violence and murder is bad verbal art, regardless of its technological achievements. Its consequence is to multiply the use of weapons in our society, of technological species, that harm mankind.

The decalogue scripts of Polish director K. Kieslowski, are master pieces of filmed literature, despite its minimal technology because they make us reflect on the basic matters of love and life and death, far more important than the designed special effects of digital computers. A fascist law is also bad art. A religion which does not accept the equality of all men, a tribal religion of “chosen of God”, is also bad ethic verbal art. Since it allows war between tribes. Those facts are self-evident to any human being that thinks naturally about the purpose of art and verbal thought. They might collide with the “economic view”, that favors all forms of literature, specially those forms of literature, that multiply the use of machines, even weapons (economic and military nationalism, advertising, etc.)… according to the old lemma “you will defend me with your sword, and I will defend you with my word”.

Such art is considered here “rhetoric art”, bad literature, since its purpose is the opposite to the biological function of verbal thought. However in present societies most verbal art is rhetoric art, art that has neither a moral, ethic standing, or even any relationship with the reality of man as an individual or member of a human society. Why is that? Because words are no longer the language of information and power of our societies, a role that today belongs to money.

As a consequence, verbal thought is no longer the language of power, the sacred language, and it has no longer the role of guiding the survival of mankind. For that reason words enter in decadence, and loose “logic, realistic power”, becoming “fiction”, a language used to describe false realities. The value of things now is given by its price, not by its verbal meaning. And so mathematics describes reality, while words are used to describe fictions, and those realities of lesser power, such as the individual lives – no longer the social lives of people… Literature is now too often fiction, or science, or shallow I-literature, ego-trips and bio-pics of little relevance, or books on secondary senses and products (from gastronomy, to do-it-yourself manuals). Sacred literature has almost died away…

The function of visual art

What was the social role on that sacred view, of visual art? If we have considered verbal art, to be in charge of the temporal perception of a civilization, visual art, obviously will be in charge of the visual perception of such culture. Visual art therefore has also a human canon, an aesthetic, spatial canon, referred to the relative dimensions of man. If verbal art has to create temporal harmony among individuals, visual art has to create spatial harmony, beauty, in the space of that civilization.

Such is the classic vision of architecture and sculpture, urbanism and painting, even gardening, or agricultural development. All those arts that transform the space around us tried to create a harmonic environment in societies. And when both canons succeeded, we talk of a harmonic civilization in which ethics and aesthetics (the moral of the eye), favor a Wor[l]d built to the image and resemblance of mankind.

The function of art, is to shape the environment of man in a pleasant way. Yet since all measure in space and time is relative (Theory of Relativity), a pleasant space for man has the references of human size and form. To make of man the center of creation, the God of the Earth. This was understood perfectly by the theoretical minds of Renaissance, the last human culture, previous to the Industrial Revolution. The aim of renascence artists was to create ethics and aesthetics, for the Italian society. They worked hand in hand with the church in charge of the ethics of Christian societies. They tried to create “canons” of beauty as the gospel tried to create canons of ethics. They affirmed that men should try to achieve a mind and a body according to such canons. The artist, as the most complex mind of society, was the guide of the individual, which tried to achieve personal perfection as a human being, imitating those ethic and aesthetic roles, the artists showed him.

The destruction of the Renaissance caused by the evolution of gunpowder weapons, the creation of religions that worshipped money instead of words as the language of information of human societies (Calvinism, Anglicanism), and the beginning of science with its despise for human words and human eyes, meant the collapse of the artist as the guide of human societies.

The human paradise as the goal of history also was lost. A new culture, and a new civilization appeared, where the goal of history became the progress of the machine, and the human goal, the paradise of human senses, where “man is the measure of all things” was forgotten.

We are living the consequences of such mistake, in a world in which man no longer matters, where humans and words are submissive to mathematics and machines…

Yet only the best human minds, verbal priests, and social activists that follow the original ideas of his wor[l]d-masters, sensorial artists, that do not renounce to explore fully the human nature, and rebels of thought that do not accept the brain-washing of scientific myths, and market-propaganda, realize of the errors of our society.

The myth of superman

All this bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the metal masters, warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal (lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, ormoney, and metal-minds or scientific instruments).

Human Masters who “think more and see more”, are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race -its body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species- and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the “super-man”, not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal and as a consequence, they also corrupt art, which becomes another ‘informative’ myth, used to glorify animetal castes in power.

Technological art: evolution of metal-minds.

What about modern technological art? It is obvious, and we treat the theme when studying metal-communicators, that modern art is rhetoric art to the service of power, of people-castes and corporations.

In that regard, both the software of modern technological art, merely visual, evident, and based in ‘motion’, which implies violence and ‘skin views’, which implies racism, and the hardware – the machine that evolves digital thought, are NOT forms of human art but ‘ab=use’ human memes degrading art, since the age of TV (film still kept due to the difficulty and inclusion of multiple arts a high quality of human sensorial memes, bust mostly at an emotional, already lowering scale of awareness):

Screen Shot 2016-03-30 at 12.54.37
In the graph, the fundamental equation of Historic regression to the past is caused by the parallel massive evolution of the machine, and its mental chips that atrophy and substitute mankind, as they create a global super organism at an accelerated speed.
This means paradoxically in the side of mankind an increasing devolution and destruction into a field of entropic disorder, from the heights of social evolution reached in the age of European r=evolution (from the XVIII enlightened age to the Russian R=evolution and isms, aborted by fascism, stalinism and capitalism, all working together against the memes of freedom and eusocial love, art and the understanding of mankind as the only ‘nation of the species’)…
So one of the lamentable facts of the 7 cultures of the world today is that they have stopped its evolution into a single global system, and are regressing to past memes, which a mere 30 years before the chip radiation started in earnest were dimmed as relics of the past, customs without more importance than to be an excuse to get together and conserve art and architecture (religious ceremonies, conserved as an empty carcass of a bygone previous phase of the eusocial evolution of man).
So as we study the 7 cultures of mankind and its collective minds, we will also study the negative side of them, the animetal part of the cultures that are fighting and winning in the process of degeneration of all those cultures. In the next ultra-repeated graph we can see above the origin of the 7 cultures of mankind in its positive and negative sides.
Equalization, hypnosis and degradation of human time.
In terms of human time existence, the fundamental property of those globalised trends of digital mass art, except the work of a few isolated artists, has a meaning: to maintain the increasingly obsolete human mind-species in a state of passive acceptance of the system, misusing its life in a lethargic state that with the arrival of violent video-games and 3D Virtual hypnotic fictions will render humans totally atrophied in its capacity to react against the system and its growing obsolescence to machines:

Screen Shot 2016-07-09 at 01.05.15

The graph from the 92 book ‘the extinction of man’, shows truly what fiction means, the extinction in life of most of the active existence of human beings hypnotised by screens that deactivate their eusocial love with selfish messages – you kill for money resumes the meaning of most telefilms, and instil the animetal idol-ogies of the system, mechanism, abrahamic cults, nationalism and worship of money.

Now this trend has extended in the process, of ‘murdering’ of art by markets and Warhol-style propaganda and advertising art. So the process of death of visual art is really advanced.

And what is more telling, as the price of trash-art, Warhol industrial mechanical posters, overcomes that of the best eclectic artist of the post-photograph age of inward, baroque informative eclectic art, Mr. Picasso, we can be sure that not even ‘critiques’ and collectors do understand the meaning of human sacred art.

art modern

In the graph, the last age of human art, was the eclectic, inward, informative 3rd age of human I=eye Wor(l)ds, which peaked with Picasso destruction of the outer world forms of the visual eye, improved by machines, by the internal mind ‘ I paint thoughts’ he said.

After that, there was a long silence broke by the hijacking of art by industrial systems of reproduction of photographs, which plagued the American post- Pollock/Hooper, non-artistic age of ‘Fakes’, perfectly described by Orson Welles, in his film on art markets. Warhol and his series of audiovisual, mechanical artists, with minimal human information (The Beatles copying Beethoven chords and put silly simple words, such as ‘I love you’, in every other word), shows clearly that art started with the arrival of audiovisual media a massive simplification previous to the present degeneration of art into electronic music, repetitive beats and minimalist thought.

Craft still exists.

So the best art today is either happening in 3rd world societies (as the Dakkar biennale shows) or in the regression to simple crafts, which have more value than a Wharhol poster. It is a root grass movement of normal people doing good imitative art, given the fact that the search for sacred art and humanist art is exhausted, and the role models of society are ‘eviL people’, intensely fighting for the destruction of all human values, pursuing those digital values of the ‘language of money’ that treat men as object.

Evilwood is NOT art, trust me. I arrived there with Mr. Pitt and Mr. Mandel, actor and producer, and a script hired to write for them and stay around for a decade. In a perfect world, Hollywood would be a holly-sacred place of astounding artistic films enhancing the nature of mankind, and a bigger number of documentary pieces.

As it is today is just the idol-ogical branch of the FMasters and the Military-Industrial Globalized Complex of corporations.

How can we classify the third type of products that the market today sells as “art”, and are neither Human Goods, not Human evolutionary visual/verbal art?

They are either crafts and industrial designs that use forms of energy and information of minimal complexity, (geometrical cycles and lines) easy to be mass-produced, with machines. They are also creative forms, such as photographs or computer art, which are new, evolved images that seem to have the characteristics of sacred art, yet lack the fundamental element of human art: the human mind is not the main creator of those forms, but a machine, a “metal-head” is. That is they are metal-mind art, the art of machines, the art of science…

In that sense we have to differentiate the human method of verbal/visual knowledge, the art of the human mind, that uses words and eyes to understand the Universe, with the method of knowledge that animetal scientists use to perceive the universe of space and time: the scientific method.

If both art and science search for knowledge of space and time, then what is the main difference between the two of them? The difference is radical, when we realize that art and science use different sensorial instruments of perception to search for that knowledge. Art uses the biological organs of mankind to understand space and time. The word, our biological language that measures time, is used in art to express thoughts and ideas about the passing of time, and its 3 dimensions, past, present and future, which verbs mirror with its 3 temporal forms. The eye, our biological organ of perception of space, is used in art to define our understanding of the three dimensions of spatial reality, width, length and depth (created in 2-dimensional painting with perspective or cubist deformation).

On the other hand, science uses sensorial organs which are not human organs, but machines, made basically of another type of atoms, metal. So we can baptize the organs of perception of science, “metal-minds”. They are “metal-sensorial organs”, machines that perceive time (clocks and computers) and machines that perceive space (telescopes, microscopes, cameras).

We could say that art is knowledge through human senses, and science is knowledge through metallic senses. It follows that arts evolve the human perception of the universe, while science evolves the perception of machines. And so, thanks to science, the primitive systems of temporal perception of machines (the clocks of Mr. Galileo) have become computers. And the primitive first “metal-eyes” of Mr. Galileo, founder of modern science (his telescopes), have become today the sophisticated cameras we see all around us.

If we are strict in our classic, biological definition of art, the languages and images which cannot be reproduced by human minds and humans hands are not human art. So science and its machines does not produce human art. Please leave aside your western ideologies that worship machines, and consider machines abstract species. Technological art is not “a creation of the human mind”, but of a “metal-mind”. And the role of man in its creation will always be secondary to the role of the machine.

If in a painting, the canvas is the passive element, and the painter the active element, in a computer-designed art form, or a photography, the human mind plays the role of the passive “canvas” adapting his style to the properties of the machine. And the active creator is the machine, which imposes his language to the “craftsman”.

So we have to be much more exigent with technological crafts to consider them a form of human art. Only those forms of technological art focused in the human experience, that require a lot of human creativity (such as “art films”, or some photographic work by masters like Cartier or Capra), can be seriously consider a technological form of human art.

The other forms of technological crafts, specially those created with computers, or related to mere mathematical, and digital shapes, belong to the “lower arts”. We call them crafts because their human content is minimal. To disguise those obvious truths, the technological artist rhetorizes his work and markets it with arrogant statements to make-belief that he is the only artist, and the machine a mere extension of his mind, not a metal-mind with his own linguistic properties (the language is the message).

That anthropocentric concept of technological art, might be true, of art made with “primitive metal-minds” (classic film-making). Yet the arrival of computers and special effects gives predominance to the machine over the human manipulator. So today Hollywood films are made by computers, according to the computer and metal-eye properties that seek higher movement and hence violence, brutality with the human body, and distortion of human feelings with dramatic effects. They are genres imposed by the machine not by the artist.

Today the arrogance of the animetal artist grows as his role in the act of creation diminishes. So we can hear sentences, such as those of a well-known Asian video artist, that considers his last work of electronic distortions, his entering on “a sublime period, like the great French gothic cathedrals”. Or the sentences of a well-known computer mogul, that considers the 010011 crunching of his software programs, “a form of creative art, like anything the great masters have ever done”. Or the evil=anti-live sentences of the father of robotics, that says he wants to play god, and construct a species superior to the human mind…

In technological crafts as in market-art, rhetoric and the cult to the machine, takes over real human creativity. Animetals can occupy their creativity in whatever they want, specially when they pursuit money and fame, which are market-oriented concepts, but we cannot pretend to make Leonardos of Animetals, children of human thought, working with Basic, Adobe Photoshop, or a video-monitor… to the risk of loosing any perspective on the nature of our human mind, and the importance that human art has to develop the human soul, our sense of ethics and aesthetics, in freedom of thought.

complex version: hierarchical i-scalesA more complex view.

A more detached view though is the higher perspective of the laws of the bio-ethic laws of the organic Universe, a level of comprehension I rarely bring to this web, as it might seem ‘too far out’ for those who ignore all about General Systems Sciences. Yet it is necessary to understand the perfect man to compare and put into perspective each of our souls and that of those we observe riding us with the 4 apocalypse horses (myths are always metaphors of higher truths which give a poetic perspective)…

So let us try… The Universe is a ‘System’ made of organisms of energy and information, from physical systems, made of an informative particle moved over a body/field of energy, to human beings, made of informative heads moved by energetic bodies, to societies ruled by a neuronal class in control of our languages of social power, (money and words, and its submissive energetic language of weapons which money and words always command), which direct a body mass of working middle classes…

This must be understood – the pantheist universe constructs its ultimate laws of science and all its sub-sets of beings, made to the image and likeness of the whole departing from that simple duality.

And so to survive it selects those entities with a more perfect ‘body’ of maximal energy, brain of maximal information and the system that maximizes both, Max. E x Max. I, which mathematically happens when E=I  (so for a total of 10, 5×5=25 > 6×4=24>7×3=21, etc.)

Now departing from those laws of General Systems, applied to human beings, there is a potential perfect man,  which maximizes those 3 survival functions:

– A man of maximal Bravery; Max. E, or mental energy to challenge the wrongs of life by applying its Intelligence (max. Information), to create an ethic and aesthetic balance (E=I), between truth (Max. Information) and Happiness (Max. strength) – yes, good people who help others have been proved by experiments to be happier, to emit more oxytocin, the drug of love and happiness). 

This simple function: Max. E -> Max. I -> Max E=I, defines the survival species of reality creating a perfect world of maximal ethics and beauty, the canon of being human (which we observe in ‘classic forms’ of aesthetics and ethics, that is of art and literature, with balance between energy and form, or in the 2nd age of maturity of any entity).

Now this simple function is broken, because E=I, ethics and aesthetics of human origin have been SUBSTITUTED by the ethics and aesthetics of the machine that destroy our collective social, ethic mind.

Thus the function of bio-ethics, of a human civilization based in the values of man, which is explained all the ‘messages’ of all the prophets of history worth to mention is now gone. But that does not mean that the search for human beauty and ethics, the natural goal of our species is not truth. It is and it will always be. So there will always be as long as humans exist in the past, present and future among the highest minds those who seek to define and practice the conduct of the perfect man, guided by the survival balance and sense of justice of the Universe, represented in our species by human ethics and aesthetics, E=I:

For example in Plato is the ‘idea of man’, the ideal man which is our potential perfect man, of which each of us, is a mere shadow, reflection in the ‘cave’, parable of the Mind of God, the Logos, or rational laws of the Universe, of that perfect man. Socrates expressed it also with its life and dictum that ‘an intelligent man (max. I) can only be a good man (E=I)’

In non corrupted Abrahamic Religions, he is the prophet, the canon of which all of us must be a reflection, trying to achieve his perfection.  This was better expressed in the great philosophers of the first age of christianity before ‘animetal cultures’ of gold and weapons degraded this religion, from Orestes to Saint Augustine, in its ‘citadel’. Here the function most cherished is E=I (Ethics).

It was expressed from Confucius (Jen Man) and Mo-Ti to Buddha in all the Eastern religions. And here as in Plato we find a close description of this Jen/Buddha man, in its 3 functions (the right fold path)

It will be again expressed by neo-platonic renaissance which stressed the 3rd final function of balance and beauty, as the Greek-Latins did (mens sana in corpore sanum).

It was NOT, expressed, contrary to belief in most prophets of the Jewish-Protestant culture,  since the Old testament is hihgly polluted by selfish tribal memes of go(l)d and war; but Moses and other prophets of the Isaiah cycle brought us the closest image of it.

So we had to wait till the French-American R=evolution and all those who imitated those Founding Fathers of modern ethics (including the marxist r=evolutionary man).

And so the Ideal, Canonical, Rightful, R=evolutionary ‘Perfect’ man exists at least in the mind of the poets of love that use the ethics of the wor(l)d to guide and create by imitation and right action, a critical mass of perfect men.

On that view modern humans and their animetal, mechanical cultures must be qualified as the Imperfect men, hence once that will not survive, because the Universe is perfect and only selects those perfect species who are made to the image and likeness of its logos, that a few of those men we quoted understood, because they had in themselves the seeds of the perfect man.

But the Universe and its selective system is both deterministic (as there are rules and laws that define what survives in the future) but also probabilistic (as a perfect universe should even forgive those who are imperfect, yet allowing them also a minimal probability of existence; hence most men are born potentially perfect, good Rousseaunian savages).

We are in that ‘Sigma 2’ using again mathematical terms of the more complex level of equations of bio-history (that dream of Asimov, which I resolved two decades ago and have seen unfolding every time ever since).

That is, we are the tail of the imperfect man, a planet with no critical mass of ethics, inteligence and aesthetics.

THE CULTURAL MIND.

MY MIND

My mind.

MY MIND IS obviously this blog And this blog  is the organic Universe in a nutshell. So why my mind has found all this? The answer is of course that my mind is part of the culture I belong to as I have shown in the previous graphs.

And so which is this mind is obvious – the organic mind of the 2 cultures that most influenced me, the mediterranean culture and the taoist, Chinese culture, which I learned in my youth travels in indochina.

BUT THIS IS not the mind of most humans today, which we must regard, as ‘technological minds’ or ‘enzymen’, whose real job for very long has been rather making machines.

So the duality of Human historic vs. Animetal minds run very deep in this blog as they explain the paradox of history, observed in the next graph:

 

THE HOMUNCULUS MIND – ANIMETALS.

And so I started to see humans as ‘homunculus ants’ perfectly programmed with its big mouths, bit hands and peanut brains to do only machines, measure things, plug data into computers and talk with their big mouths and peanut brains about how astonishingly superior, intelligent above heavens and earth their ‘egos’ are… And SO my response was dual – on the side of my relationship with other humans I became very arrogant and indifferent, closing for very long all intellectual communication with them; on the side of the Universe I went  further into the taoist, humble realization we were nothing but dust of space-time. You can call it a ‘bipolar reaction’, to the Homunculus which WRONGLY despises the Universe and thinks is above it, and to the Universe, who despises the Homunculus, rightly and as it IS above it, it is going to crunch it soon and throw it to the garbage of history, as soon as AI and robots take over…  Hence other name for this bipolar theory:

 

Absolute relativity.

Regardless of the fact nobody cares, and likely is just a distorted mirror on the absolute information the universe holds on itself, I repeat to the homunculus which should by now abandon the web offended (: what I have written in a very resumed form is the biggest advance on philosophy of science since Galileo discovered the mechanical method, added to the experimental method of Aristotle, the power of sensorial machines to perceive the Universe – along the development of mathematical tools more proper to mirror the measures of machines; in as much as it adds the organic elements of the Universe to the mixture, giving a much more rounded meaning to the different species of science, and completing the understanding of time and space.

So you might wonder why nobody cares about it. Of course I do also wonder after decades of having discovered the 5th dimensional Universe and tried – intermittently – to give it to the scholar world. Oh, yes, we know the explanations – the nature of scientific r=evolutions (Kuhn), the relatively artist nature of lonely researchers, etc. But the fact remains to put it in common language, that NO HUMAN I have ever met gives a FUK about the most astounding explanation of the meaning of existence, the ultimate question ANY RATIONAL, humble, INTELLIGENT MIND SHOULD CARE. Nobody, None, Nope, zero.

So after the permanent depression in which that realization throw me decades ago with 173 rejections to my earlier self-printed book on the matter, ‘the error of Einstein’… besides becoming a lost soul, now sick and tired, hoping at least to leave a trace of all this in http://www.unificationtheory.com – the mnemonic name for this web…

I had obviously to take two paths, either reject my work, which I did for 2 decades, caring nothing about it, going intermittently into social activism, sex, drugs and R&R and dolce fare niente, I obviously changed my view on humans as rational, intelligent beings and developed the whole model of history and memetics, which came to account for the extraordinary limits of humanity in all what concerns and compares with the extraordinary intelligence of the Universe, except for an obvious feature – the astounding arrogance and sense of self-entitlement of the species, which knows NOTHING and thinks it knows EVERYTHING… not to speak of its morality, thinking the individual particle not the network is the protagonist of history; or its religions where he is the center of the Universe, or its chosen one, or the only intelligence.

All this is garbage. Humans are nothing. We are all dust of space-time and the only remarkable intelligence is that of the Universe itself:

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the latter’ Einstein, one of the few exceptions that confirm the rule.

To be frank for quite long now I have not considered my mind belonging to the humind species. Its logic is No longer Aristotelian, of a single arrow causality; its geometry is Not euclidean, its ethics is NOT individualistic, its interest is not in other humans but in the TAO of nature. But that gives me the sole objective capacity to judge humans and do social sciences too. So let us start with the obvious – why huminds (ab. human mind) don’t give a FUK about reality as IT IS.

We humans have a defect so obvious that when we liked religions it became the original capital sin – arrogance. We really think we are a unique species, and our intelligence can only compare to that of God. The paradox of the ego is easy to understand in rational terms, when we know what minds do: to stop reality into a still linguistic image of the Universe (visual, verbal, mathematical) in which we see ONLY the language not the universe in its infinite size and motion.

In the human case that mind has 2 fundamental languages of space and time the ultimate substances of reality:

Visual images, and its geometric mathematical simplification which describe space.

And temporal verbs, words and its simplification, logic.

So the human mind is an I=eye (space language)>wor(l)d (time language), which measures space with visual eyes and time with verbal words. And its formal languages, mirrors of the spacetime Universe, are mathematics and logic.

This a priori linguistic ‘screen’ between the limited information of the mind and the ∞ Uni verse is what cause our paradox of the ego who thinks to be infinite. So we can write an ‘equation of the linguistic mind’ that defines the ego paradox: 0 x ∞ = Constant. Indeed, in terms of the mind the ‘limiting equation’ of algebra writes:

O: Infinitesimal self centered mind languages x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant still mapping of the world.

So the infinitesimal mind confuses the infinite Universe with its linguistic image or ‘WORLD’, which is one for each infinitesimal mind – ‘each point has a world in itself’, said Leibniz. But as we think our mind-world IS the Universe and our mind world makes OUR NOSE bigger than Andromeda, we are built up to have a HUGE EGO, distort reality and DENY organic, living properties to the rest of the moving, temporal Universe we ‘stop’ on our mind. So the Earth moves but we see it still. The earth is NOT the center of the Universe but we feel it is the center and so on.

So even before we start talking, if you can’t swallow that pill and realize that your ego cheats you into thinking you are the center; but in objective science, you are nothing but dust of space-time, we cannot make science. Since the problems of the ego do NOT solve with reason. As it is about being happy not finding truths.

Science is NOT happy – the reinforcing program of the ego, but objective and has the advantage that it ‘exists’. The ego, and the mind-world does NOT. It is a mathematical infinitesimal, a ‘zero’. And to fit all in a zero, everything is still in the mind because the kills its motion to focus on what is interesting for your survival – food moving, other humans who are ‘so important’ as you, etc. BUT science tells us we are only dust of space-time, like everything else in the organic Universe, where all is relative, nothing matters more.

And so what science tell us is that man HAS No importance in the Universe, as we are neither its center in space, or time or even scale, the last discovery of ‘absolute relativity’:

 In the graph, the fundamental characteristic of reality is its Absolute relativity, without preferential position, form or scale of size; as we are all Organic Points of space-time.
So science has been always an objective struggle against the never-dying subjective happiness of humans wanting to be the center of the Universe. First the absolute center chosen by the creator (Abrahamic religions). Then the center of space (earth-centric astronomy). Next the creator of the languages of the Universe (Pythagorean, quantum religions). And yet, none of those subjective truths is real. We have no immortal form in time, as evolution proved. We are not created with any special role. We are ‘a rock lost in a corner of the infinite cosmos, and departing from those facts we can talk about man’ (Schopenhauer) and of lately quantum realism proves that the Universe is real not a mathematical construct of the quantum observer. Finally the organic, fractal nature of reality makes no scale preferential.
But most humans still find some excuse to consider themselves ethnocentric, egocentric, earthcentric, timecentric and scalecentric.
In that sense,  the attitude of mankind respect to the much more intelligent, densely informative and complex Universe, which becomes ‘reduced’ to the human selfish perspective, without much ado – always in its center, first of location, then of evolution, now of ‘intelligence’… has a rational explanation – the paradox of the ego –  and its the biggest handicap for a scientific evolution of humind’s (ab. human mind=world) knowledge. to adapt our ‘limited world’ to the larger laws of the fractal organic Universe, the only possible philosophy of science.

Since only an organism is self-generated and does not need a god-maker to put the machine at work; so the alternative ‘mechanist theory’ of science, in place since Kepler’s huge ego-trip, a mixture of Biblical creationism and physicists’ mechanism, so obvious in the big-bang theory of a Universe born of a huge explosion from an infinitesimal mind-dot, is NOT science BUT A CLEVER modern form of religion.

Indeed, all abstract mechanist theories of the Universe are hidden deist religious theories, which need a maker to exist – and data as we show in our articles on the big-bang is subtly chosen and bent to cater to that ‘dogma’. Point.

 

WORLD-$TOCK – MIND OF METALEARTH

 The stock-market, financial brain of the super-organism of the Metal-earth.

Let us  consider an overview of the organic structure of the Financial complex as an organism independent of man, with a financial/informative brain which processes with monetary flows the information about the components of the organism, selecting the species of machines and other metal-memes it will reproduce, those that will become extinct and which corporations will receive further ‘monetary energy to continue its re=productive tasks. In the graph, today most of the computer power of the world is in the hands of companies and financial systems, organized by those who control the stock markets. In the graph, Stocks help the self-integration of the metal reproductive ecosystem, beyond the restrictions of the human mind. Artificial Intelligence is not a copy of human intelligence. It is an adaptation of the functions of nervous thought, of the human mind to different kinds of machines. Artificial Intelligence is born in companies as an internal brain that directs the body of the economic organism.

The homology between stock markets and brains or DNA systems is based in the bio-logical nature of economies, and company-mothers.

The graph describes the basic energy-information networks of Bio-economies ruled by stock-money. Stock holds, as brains do, most of the ‘code-language of information’ of the ecosystem. The brain will use that code to produce certain carbohydrates which are useful to the cell.

Stock has license to print money and will allocate them to the mother-companies of new technology with maximal price (weapons) of maximal reproductive power=Max. sales = Max. profits, such as digital software or maximal volume (energy).

Thus in this manner stock-markets express with money the arrow of evolution of the super-organism of machines, expanding its energy/information neetworks, its informative, audiovisual machines, its reproductive systems and its weapons.

On the other hand, human goods require human work, have minimal price by lack of affinity with metal-money values and are perishable, produce lesser monetary profits and are scorned by stock-speculators, which give no credit to all the products that could create a sustainable world.

In this manner the stock-market constantly deviates the wealth of humankind towards the reproduction and evolution of the memes of metal and the small elite of mechanist scientists, capitalist bankers/economists and corporation of machines, which during this age of crisis have further enlarged the gap between the FMI elite and the rest of the humankind. Yet because economic experts work for the FMI and have as dogma that the evolution of machines is the future of mankind, there is no criticism against policies, which are ‘de facto’ extinguishing this planet.

This was in the first age of the FMI complex carried about by human networks of traders/bankers, military people and scientists. In the next graph we can see the ‘historic age’ of human networks of traders and stockrats, or capitalist/religious age, when the Jewish-Protestant empire was created:

40-BIOECONOMIC-CONQEST-1024x770

In the graph, the globalization of the Financial system, in which the stock-market invents money for free first as stock-paper then as ticker money and finally as electronic money, departing from Holland, the 1st ‘biblical corporative’ cult(ure), mother of the FMMI system that today rules the world. Since even if in other countries the structure of the Financial-Media system is not so clear, with the globalization of the world, the entire planet by imitation or alliance are ruled by the American Financial-Media system, except the Chinese block and to a certain extent its allies or those cultures who are opposed to America, Russia and Islamic and African nations are not totally ‘owned’ and brain-washed by American media.

Then those processes became integrated in corporations of scientific machines and weapons, ruled by paper-money. Yet humans were still in charge, albeit slaves of their mechanist, capitalist and nationalist ideologies. Today the process is being transferred to all type of software programs, networks of machines, automated systems of reproduction and enhanced by the last ‘batch’ of ideologies of technology (productivity, ‘just wars’, mechanist science).

The end of the process is obvious: once all biological process of evolution and reproduction of the FMI system are transferred into software, the Metal-earth will be born.

Politicians do not understand that the stock-market and the human economy are different systems. The 1st is based in flows of electronic money, the 2nd in printed currencies. What the present explosion of electronic money derivatives is doing is deviating massively wealth from the human economy to the economy of corporations and paper-money. The inflated value of corporations and networks of information of the FMI-metal system and the chronic undervaluation of human goods and salaries is neither just from a human p.o.v. nor should be tolerated in democracies, but it is happening because the FMI complex has always predated over the human, life-based agricultural world.

Today it is not as obvious as when kings and tax-collectors exploited directly people, but the process is essentially the same: money is invented as e-data very easily in markets, through speculation and financial derivatives. While people receive printed money which grows far slower. So the wealth of corporations and bankers multiplies geometrically and the wealth of the human ecosystem of life goods arithmetically. In the past 30 years stock-markets have multiplied for 100 the value of stocks and derivatives, provoking a massive inflation in all human goods, while salaries have merely increased in a 1 to 10 scale. The result is like a parasite that were absorbing the blood of the human super-organism, provoking the endemic scarcity of human goods and poverty of the human mass.

For that reason the only possible reversal of that process would be the nationalization of the entire financial Industry, the creation of massive deficits in printed money, achieved with the creation of a global currency, ¥€$ money, fusioning yuans, yens, euros and dollars, and a 30% annual deficit by governments. This quantity of money similar to the quantity of money corporations add for free to their valuations through speculative markets of invention of e-money would allow the creation of a global minimal salary to jack up demand in basic human goods consumed by the poor and the inversion in projects that create a sustainable world (clean energies, infrastructures, education, public transport, tourism).

This economic measure coupled with a military reduction of budgets and expansion of UNO and EU like organizations and diplomatic forums, and/or a triad of EU-US-Chinese leadership, applying the science of bio-history to the design of an efficient superorganism of mankind in control of the FMI complex could halt the self-suicidal path in which mankind has entered, by trusting blindly without any understanding the evolutionary process of machines, weapons and money, we call ‘the free market’. Yet the free market is not free, it is an evolving complex system that preys on Gaia, life beings and the 90% of human beings, who do not profit directly from the sale of weapons and the invention of e-money in stock markets that have made corporations the dominant institution of the world with enough credit to cre(dit)ate a world to the image and likeness of machines.

In the 3 technological cycles, NYSE’s curve of machine’s stock population follows the same chair-like curves of biological populations; since each machine is a biological organism that finds ‘econiches’ in war and labor fields, substituting and consuming its rival human beings, workers and soldiers or as consumption machines, when they are consumed by humans to enhance our energy/information skills.

 

If we treat machines as collective species, analyzing their global population through the stock price of their company mothers, those graphs are self-similar to the Volterra curves of re=production and extinction of  any living species. Since for companies a population of machines means an amount of sales and profits that determine their stock price. Thus:

Stock-prices=sale-profits=re-production of machines.

Thus, the biological stock-curve that shows the reproduction and extinction of machines is its company’s sales or profit curve, directly proportional to the value curve of the company and the population curve of the ‘species’ of machines is that of its industrial sector in the stock market.  The graph compares those 2 curves for electronic machines and its 3 phases:

—     For a long period the machine (or species) evolves slowly in the labs of companies or inventors. It is equivalent to the slow period of mutations that will bring a new species into being (allopatric evolution)..

Then, the machine matures and its costs of reproduction plummet. The machine now occupies an econiche in the human world, substituting a certain human organic function, and consumers multiplt its sales exponentially. It is the takeoff of the machine. Since it starts from a very low population, prices now multiply very fast, so investors make the highest profits.

—     Yet, sooner than later, given their exponential rhythm of production, far superior to the increase of human population, machines saturate the consumer market. Since symbiotic species depend on the population of the species they associate to those machines are organic enhancers of our energetic or informative power, the ‘vital space’ of machines is the total human population with resources to buy them. Thus, once the machine saturates the ecosystem of mankind, if re=production continues, profits and sales diminish and companies accumulate inventories. At that point their sales and stock market curves decline. Again in Nature, one species that has overpopulated its vital space, suffers a population crash, as it has also depleted its ‘preys’ and cannot longer feed itself. The population finally reaches a balance with their prey and it becomes stable. So happens with stock-market curves of machines that become flat.

At this point in Nature a species cannot increase its population unless it mutates into a new, more efficient species that can feed on new preys. That is exactly what happens to the machine: After the overpopulation crisis, the machine mutates into a weapon and continues expanding its ecosystem, preying over human beings, no longer symbiotic to them.

– It is the third age or military age of the machine that is used now for war. So the trains of the Age of machine bodies become armored trains and colonialism becomes the ideology of the XIX c., the cars of the 29 crash become tanks and Hitler uses them to conquer Europe an the pcs of the American age become predators in a new age of colonialism against the poor. Again what matters is not the ‘memetic ideologies of the FMI complex’ that convince a certain nation to use those weapons, but the fact that those wars keep evolving the FMI complex and destroying the world of Gaia and non-technological cultures.

Unfortunately the same companies that make machines make weapons so their lobbies merely back military politicos and corrupted governments enter the game. Now the cycle of economic growth is based on Keynesian militarism: weapons are bought and death begins. Since weapons destroy themselves quickly in the battle front and must be renewed, the increasing demand of machines multiplies the benefits of companies. G.M. multiplied by 8 its profits, making tanks in W.W. II. So war becomes the economic engine of the last 36 year period, a Kondratieff cycle.

Company-mothers govern the world with a single aim: to re=produce machines. Among them, the most powerful ones reproduce top predator weapons. So, in as much as we can analyze company-mothers as reproductive organisms with biological cycles, called business cycles, we can find out, studying those reproductive cycles of machines, specifically of weapons, when there will be enough top predator weapons re=produced in our ecosystem, to cause war.

Modern wars are economic processes, embedded in the very same structure of ‘monetary and machine reproduction’. Indeed, the evolution of technology makes each new lethal machine much more efficient killing humans, there is also a progression in the number of casualties that each World War causes; which can be directly related to the growth of the stock-market that shows the price-quality of both, consumption machines and weapons; since in war ages ALL the machines of the system are weapons and the market reaches its maximal value. Yet since weapons consume human beings there is a parallel progress on the value of stock-markets that 100-fold each cycle of evolution of machines and the number of causalities in war that 100-fold each cycle. The progression, as most evolutionary increases of power in the Universe, is decametric: in each new World War, 102 times as many people die than in the previous one: 600.000 died in the Railroad wars at the end of the I Kondratieff cycle. 60 million people died in W.W. II. In the next cycle of war, the Age of the Singularity, when the first self-reproductive nano-robots, or the Final Weapon, the black hole of the Nuclear Industry appears at CERN, 6000 million, the entire human population, might die.

3. The overproduction age of chips that expel us from labor and war fields.

z-b

In the graph, from an old book (the extinction of man, 92), when i used the ‘hard language’ of mathematical space-time vectors to describe the FMMI superorganism we can see how worldstock in its western section, Wall street, acts as the ‘informative black hole’ of the Metal-Earth controlling with flows of money the 3 sub-vectors of:

– Energetic machines (weapons-transports) with center in Detroit.

– Informative machines (blue), with center in the West coast.

The graph highlighted what were at the time the leading 3 sub-corporations of each sector, as systems always end up having 3 top sub-systems specialized in energy, information and reproduction.

The human factor, the A-merican, Aristotelian believer was considered irrelevant as he will always follow under its go(l)d religions (jewish-protestant religions mathematized by classic economists) that he must obey his single Go(L)d, without understanding it (‘people must be kept ignorant to remain obedient’ said calvin…