Home » “@tº




“DAVID BOHM: We are seeking a substance, something, that stands under the appearances. We seek it in reality. It has been the age-long habit to look for some solid, permanent reality that underlies all the changes and explains them so that we understand. But it may be that the whole of reality is no substance. Perhaps it does not have an independent existence, is a field, and what stands under this reality is truth. Would that make sense to you?
KRISHNAMURTI: But that would lead us to a great danger.
DAVID BOHM: There’s a danger in that. Is there any way of making this point clear?
KRISHNAMURTI: The inner is the truth. Are you saying that?
DAVID BOHM: Not exactly, no. We are saying that truth is action.
KRISHNAMURTI: Yes, truth is action. Perception is action, seeing is action.”

“The Limits of Thought.” iBooks.

‘Don’t confuse motion with action’ Hemingway; on the simplicity of those who think the only motion of the Universe is locomotion.


@t¡ons of exi≈st¡ence

Foreword: @tions.

THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A->B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a co-existing super organism of time-space.

The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.

The mind as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present ego-selfie stage.  But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @-mind will leave way to the non-Æ logic of the group.

We use then the symbol @t, which really means act (the A enclosed in the c) to signify this self-centered point of view of the mind which is the site of the actions of survival of the being to clearly differentiate as we always do in the symbology of I-logic, actions of exist¡ence, proper of all ‘st¡ences’, from actions of physics.


  1. • Mind§ingularities.
  2. Philosophy of the mind: Absolute relativity
  3. Non-Æ-minds as fractal points:The 0-1 Dimensional isomorphism


The function of exi=st¡ence

The aeiou of existence.


  1. Monads in physical systems: singularities, vortices of future time.
  2. Monads in biological systems: genetics and nervous brains
  3. Monads in social systems: art the minds of civilisations, my mind knot of my culture.
  4. Economic minds: the homunculus animetal. world stock the mind of Metalearth

Abstract. The Universe is a fractal superoganism of 5 Dimensional motions of time§pace (ab. Ðimotions):

When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.

Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.

As such it has topological, spatial, mathematical properties; logical, temporal ones, and organic, scalar properties derived of its spacetime structure, which must be added to the usual analysis of time space systems.

Thus we consider then for each species of space-time a basic ternary description of its ‘adjacent topologies’ that define all systems as simultaneous super organisms in space; that will perform 5 ‘aeiou’ vital actions: accelerated motions, energy feeding, information gauging, offspring reproduction and universals’ evolution’

Existence is the function we want to explore. This is clear Beings try to exist by performing actions=dimotions of space time which satisfy its singularity ego of existence, starting by its desire to perceive, then to move, feed, reproduce, evolve socially think of the being of yourself, in every part of reality. In this manner the dimotions of the being externally become parallel to its actions of timespace internally. 

Physicists study locomotions and transferred the concept of an action of ‘angular momentum’, to a time-space ‘form-event’ measure often with energy parameters.

We take from that restricted use of actions the logic consequence.


The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence. 

Because of the reductionism of physics to a single locomotion arrow, which due to its simplicity can be calculated with maximal precision physicists tend to be arrogant to other sciences, thinking they know it all about time. Fact is they ignore everything about 4 of the 5 arrows of time.

The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the Universe is dying  and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

Let us now blow up your ‘physicist’s’ mind introducing once we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discover their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein.

The Galilean paradoxes: Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):


The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.

When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.
The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.

It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
- The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
- And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.

Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.
The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances. The Paradox of Galileo.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.

Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’—motions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.

And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:

All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.

So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’

Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.

In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:

– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).

– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.

A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion. While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.

In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining THE ESSENTIAL DUALITIES OF FREEDOM AND ORDER. So topology becomes metaphysics.

ALL THIS SAID, there is a huge other field of analysis of time-space, called Evolution, founded by Darwin which deals with the changes in the information of beings. Why? Because indeed, besides the previously analyzed dimotions of locomotion, origin of relativity, and entropy, latter considered in more detail as the synonymous of death and dissolution, (which physicists also merely describe mathematically and confuse with the motion of gases, so we shall work that theme on the sections of physical laws),  there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially. 

Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:


The minimal particle-points,  electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms.

So all systems of the Universe  ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.

Yet the Universe tries always to be positive: If you realize the only dimension of time the Universe does NOT code is entropy=death, which it treats as a maximal motion that disorders the being.

So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.

DEATH is the needed  error of the Universe NOT desired by the program. 

For that reason it lasts only  a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).

So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting… 

Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around.  Death is the shortest possible arrow.

This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.

Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those  ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…

The automated survival program.

The dynamic vital outlook of reality departs from the fact that every singularity (ab. @,º) has an automatic will of survival born of the very simple, obvious fact that to exist you must reproduce and last before your finite time. If time were not finite, cyclical, you would not need to act, reproduce and evolve. So there is a simple function of existence that r=evolves around the process of reproduction which is a back and forth travel through scales of the fifth dimension; as you ‘seed’ a smaller version of your self in the lower scale, then you reproduce in energy you feed on, your information and then socially you evolve the parts of the being into a whole.

The singularity perceives initself-thestillness asbeing. But it is not. It varies.

The stop and go motion are ¡ts steps. Continuous discontinuous sensation of being, sum of actions repeated and chained by memory ‘weight’, slides into higher warping, the singularities despite they wanting to explode in growth not shrink and warp, but in its war declaration to the external Universe,which will ALWAYS HAVE LESS CURVATURE, it looses and grows with more in-form-ation, till it becomes a hollow death as all ST-fields of existence: Ø<<:



Existence is made of moments/actions in finite time, pegged to a flow of vital space-energy across dimotions.

In the graph, this series of ‘necessary @tions≈Ðimotions’ of spacetime forma natural survival program, self-centered into the @, which for obvious reasons, as the center of flows of communication and energy between the elements of the being, will therefore be also the center of the will of action.

We express therefore the chain of actions->survival->perception->actions that define the being with a simple equation, we shall call the function of existence: Max.  S x T… Which departs from the ‘automatic’ fact that any singularity will act as a ‘mirror’ expressing itself, or organic view of its territory in the outer world which it orders to achieve its goals.

We can describe it in an automaton manner, as only those systems who best perform the program of existence survive, or in a ‘will-way’ as we might consider the consciousness of the process – that is the mirror image of still form of the being that ‘perceives’ in itself, constantly acts to maintain that image.

‘We act to Max. ∫exi ∂st, we exi=st to act’

Existence is seen from the singularity povs as a chain of actions.

And we do so by maximizing the 5 dimensions=actions of beings. So when we talk the vital approach to explain the time space dimotions of reality, we have a completely new jargon to use in socio-biological systems, better suit for vital explanations even if those actions will also have a topological, qualitative, numerical, social explanation/model as those of physical systems performing similar actions of existence:

The aei, simple actions of accelerated motions, informative gauging and energy feeding are thus merely the ‘preparations’ for the necessary higher, complex actions of social evolution and reproduction (universals creation and offspring reproduction, to follow the mnemonic rule of the 5 vowels).

The topological connections of those actions with geometric dimotions is immediate but not essential to the proper understanding of the actions per se, which only follow strict geometric parallelisms in the simplest forms, but can be detected when geometry and function are closely related, and so, as an intermediate analysis of that relationship between form and function, we have also considered the Asy♣metric ternary division into Complementary=disy◊metric, parallel=sy♥metric and perpendicular, darwinian antisy♠metric relationships established between the ‘actor’ or singularity and the elements of the externa world with whom it acts:

Screen Shot 2018-03-16 at 10.53.00 AM

To exist is to act, that is to combine motion and form, convert time into space, ∆ð≥§@; to exist as a T.œ is NOT to think only, as you do know, to move only as heat does – and lately most humans in an entropic age of history… but to focus motion into form, often converting a software into a hardware, an energy into an information – all degrees and similarities of being. To act then can be classified as primary actions which cater to the ternary elements of the being:

we talk of the aei, simplex actions of ‘being: motion (accelerated actions) form the limbs/potentials, energy feeding for the body wave, information gauging for the mind-particle…

And o,u Complex social actions which go beyond the individual and require the ensemble of the ∆ø being with its social clones in offspring reproduction and creation of ‘Universals’, social wholes.

Yet all actions depart from the will of a singularity-mind, which has the understanding of the whole thanks to his still mind-mapping of the being as a simultaneous territory of order.  So we shall study here and in the preceding post ‘to exist’, the mind that acts, the actions it performs and the different examples to be found in social, biological and physical t.œs

To love the supreme goal.

It follows then that the more complex action of reality that summons them all is Love, and that redeems the Universe, because reproduction and social evolution are binary and multiple paths of love:


In the graph, our selfie culture misses the point of the Universe, which is eusocial love and reproduction of members of the same species. The reason of that sociological blunder are studied in depth in the articles on the supœrganism of history and the eco(nomic)system.

This we know, that God, the Mind of the Fractal Universe is social evolution, the coming together of similar beings into new wholes, social organisms that emerge as a new plane of existence, independent of its parts; stronger than the individuals, which survive better pegged together by the force of love.

Existence, survival is the name of the game. And when you love those who are like you, members of the same species, you make it in the game. And when you don’t, others who do, eliminate you.

Since love is the stronger force, but death the reinforcing strategy of a God which is just in its cruelty, as the ultimate selection chooses the best playing the game of social love and abhorts the lonely heroes that try to make it alone.

This humans today have forgotten and so our survival as a species is at stakes.

Scientists study the species of the Game of Existence, the Tao of the ancient Chinese, the game of survival of the modern biologists, mind of the Universe with 3 languages whose logic seems at first sight different but all express the same rules of love thy neighbor, when it is similar to you; feed on him when it belongs to a different species.

Indeed, matter is ruled by mathematics in physical and economic systems, but the unit of maths is the number, a social group of indistinguishable beings, hence pegged by social evolution, loosing its individualism.

Then biological systems are ruled by the logic of survival of evolution, but social evolution, of ants and humans survives better. So again the arrow of social love dominates.

And finally ideal human societies are ruled by the social ethics of love.

So the 3 kind of systems are different in language, but all languages, as we shall see in the study of the Universal grammar of them all, shows  those 3 sciences are in fact ruled by love and social organization.

Indeed,the game of existence thus favors not the individuals, but the collective form. Since even the individual is a multicellular super organism in which cells collaborate with the help of the reproductive blood networks and its oxygen and hormonal orders, pegged further together by the nervous system.

Which becomes then the consciousness of the whole, as it emerges through its networks.

The chains of existences.

The chains of existences that put together in synchronous motions the inner clocks of the being must be synchronized to a core clock which will become the cpu or soul of the system. The central processing unit of information thus have a master clock to which all the clock cycles are synchronized and act as the slow motion for the Unit of wholes, through the synchronous faster ‘nervous-informative higher network’ of the ‘other species, of higher energy x information. To balance the ∂tS limits of the fifth dimension, and the ∫ exi present becomes then another expression of the same will for survival.




That is how a world cycle of existence of a micro-point taken as Euclidean, becomes a pixel of information for a digestive system, a mind, a non-Euclidean point.

  1. First Act : Non-Euclidean points-singularities:Informative perception: §ð
  2. Second Action-Dimotion: Locomotion: Lineal momentum: $t.
  3. Third Action-Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Body waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏.
  4. Fourth Action-Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂.
  5.  Fifth Ðimotion-Action: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T

In the graphs, from a 30 years old book on 5D planes,  one of my first drawings of the planes and dimotions in which the humind co-exists.

We can see the symmetry between those actions across different scales of existence of the fifth dimension, while extracting from the ∆±4 levels of existence the different quanta of ‘energy’ (∆-2), ‘information’ (∆-3), ‘motion’ (∆-4), or actions at distance, easy to obtain, ‘simplex actions’, vs. the actions of complex organisation, Œ, and Û, capitalised, for that reason, most often, or complex actions which also require ‘bits and bites’ of ∆-1 seminal and ∆º social scales.

Then in each of those 5D time scales, the mind ‘traveller’ through the interposed regions of its Γ•, will be able to absorb and emit the different forms of entropy, energy and information (exi), which ensures the being’s proper control of its world.

Perception: information perceives in the stillness of simultaneity.

Regarding perception I have never thought to be a mystery: perception is the very essence of information in still simultaneity – the existence of a still mapping in a minimal §pace, during a quanta of ðime, must be ‘felt in itself’ as Leibniz and Aristotle intuitively thought – in other words §pace is the intelligent of reality and its pure order and stillness the sensation of being, not self-reflecting, not self-conscious but ‘Dasein’, being in itself. But this ‘static’ awareness of calm and form, must be connected to multiple networks for the mirror-image of the mind to ‘act’ and order reality.

How this consciousness of every stif point emerges then is another question – A QUESTION OF TIME FLOW AWARENESS AS THE STIFF POINT SEEMS TO CONTINUE with slightly changes due to motion; and the existence of modular languages, as one perceives the other, in the human case the:

Universal §pace > language of sight >eye> I< wor(l)d < ðime language

So LANGUAGES DO also create reality as smaller ‘mappings’ of a larger universe, with more information paradoxically (5D metric: Max. Information = Min. Space) than the whole.

The negative, lethal effects on the mind, parasite of energy: its ego paradox.

IT follows that the physical, biological or psychological mind has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

The languages of God are infinite. While we do NOT shy to mathematical equations, the languages of ‘God are infinite’ (Upanishads). That means the religion of machines, among Humans, which are today basically slaves of their computer machines for most themes including the perception of knowledge, and so need to talk with numbers to feel truth, is NOT real. We shall specially in this blog on social sciences use and justify and explain why the VALUES OF the wor(l)d, and our natural language is a better language for truth, and certainly for evolution and ðime predictions (being evolution a verbal language). I get specially irritated by all those ‘nerds’ who think if you don’t show a PowerPoint presentation with nice graphs and equations you are NOT doing science.

Not so, qualitative, formal, dimensional information, in human beings HAVE always been explained with human ðime-clocks, the ‘verbal ðimes’ of our flexible sentences and human eyes – the artistic sensorial work of our spatial senses. This means they are also excellent ðime records which today the ‘mathematical/mechanical school’ of social sciences tends to shun off – the classic case being Herodotus’ books of history, which turned out to be actually filled of facts, despite being so much prone to mythology. So words and facts come together to verify truths, and words are when conceptually sound are the proper causal language to explain evolution theory and the extensions due to cyclical ðime.


Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘time-action-oriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous time-space cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mind-monad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.

As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.

Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the time-space spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1-dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…

As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…



I.. The @tions of beings. The will of existence.Max. ∫ e x i ∂st

II. Epistemology: Rashomon effect: The five perspectives on Existential Algebra: S@≈∆ð

III. Proofs in all ∆ Planes

∆¡>|2|. Physical systems.

∆¡<|3|. Biological systems.

∆i≈1,2. Historic systems.

Abstract. The multiple p.o.v.s on spacetime reality

When we approach reality there is always a multidimensionality to it, because there will always be at least 5 elements about the reality we observe: space, S, time T, scale, ∆, the perceiver’s mind, @, and the connecting relationships between them, which in turn will give us duality systems, spacetime Ðimotions: scalar space, ∆§ and so on…

We can then group the elements in triads and finally we can put the 5 together, ∆ð≥S@. So there are many possible entangled realities to study them as whole connected elements. 

What are then the ‘relevant combinations’? Obviously the Ðimotions of spacetime, which considered from the perspective of the singularity are ‘actions’ of existence, attempts of the @ mind to survive, to exist, to interact with the external world, to @ct and exist are thus similar realities, @cts give us the internal perspective, existence, is our external point of view. And what the being that acts tries is to maximize its existence; its force and momentum, its perception, feeding, growth, evolution, its worldcycle…

So in this and the next post, we study those time-space actions, from the inner point of view of the singularity as actions of space-time and from the outer point of view of the receiver, as the existence of a being, whose existential force, in what it is better perceived, the body-wave, exi, is maximized when e=I, or s=t (its singularity and clock membrane).

Actions – the minimal quanta of space-time beings.

‘Don’t confuse motion (entropy) with action (motion with a goal)’ Hemingway to Dietritch

life; noun 1. The condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for energy feeding, informative gauging, social and individual growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.
All systems of nature are alive, as all act simplex or complex, to survive in the game of exist¡ence.

Life is Action, a program of drives of existence that should rule the memes of mankind and society. We consider then 5 actions that define life: 3 simplex actions: energy feeding for the body, motion for the limbs, information gauging for the head, and together they ‘feed, and maintain’ the 3 ‘elements’ and physiological networks of our organisms. And two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution that ensure our existence beyond death.

In the graph we can understand life, observing a human being, as the feeding with 3 simplex actions of the 3 parts of the organism, its moving limbs, energetic body and informative mind.

But as parts of social organisms humans also reproduce with other human organisms, and evolve socially defining two complex actions. Nothing else is needed to define life, including life of mechanical beings, whose actions of ‘existence’ are performed by its company-mother-mothers, which show the ‘living properties of machines”:

In graphs, 5 actions ensure the survival program of all scales of stientific species: above the actions of company-mothers of machines which adapt planet earth to its image and likeness. Below the individual actions of humans and below in scales of diminishing size the actions of molecules, atoms and forces. All of them respond to the same aeiou program of survival (accelerations, e-ntropy feeding, I-nformative gauging, o-ffspring reproduction and u-niversals-wholes creation which ensures all the parts of the being will keep its inner space-structure and outer time function.

Actions of space-time are the minimal vital Unit of reality, and as such all the codes of the Universe can be written in åctions

In that sense, the definition of biological live, which sets the goals of being human, in turn sets the products and goods a proper economic systems should reproduce for humans to thrive at individual level through ‘our simplex’ 3 actions of feeding, moving and perceiving and at social level through our reproductive and eusocial, loving actions.

To live is to act. And there are only 5 type of actions, which a proper economic and political system should promote and enhance for all cells to thrive. In the next graph we consider those 5 actions from the highest level of complexity in systems sciences, observing how all systems of reality reproduce those actions, including atoms, and company-mothers.

Humans however are NOT meeting those actions in most beings who cannot thrive and enjoy life ad maximal, because we live in a planet dedicated to promoting the life of machines.

Abstract. To exist is the game we all play. To do so we try to survive, and so we can establish a simple function of existence, which consists on 5 actions to survive that all systems of the Universe play. We like to use for the function not a mathematical but a logic acronym. To exist, is to act gauging information, moving towards energy absorbing it to reproduce and evolve socially into larger wholes, aeiou… to exist is to @ct, from a singularity-mind, whose external actions will always be those 5 actions and as such since even the smallest particles quarks and electrons perform those actios, all exists, all has will, all has a mind.

Yet the purpose of those 5 actions is also to find a balance as a complementary being, in the symmetric centre of your relative ∆±¡ scales, | x O lineal entropic feeding fields and O-informative minds, in between your motion, young age and your age of information, maintaining your present state, the longest possible time; and so existence is maximised in the point of balance.

How can we define this point of balance of symmetry with the asymmetric forces of your world? Here is where our acronym for existence makes sense: exi≈st, when our 3 elements are in balance our spatial mind and temporal membrane is in balance with the energy and information stored in its internal vital body-wave; the being reaches its maximal plenitude, as its ‘existential force’, which we define as the product of both elements, either measured internally (Exi) or through its membrane and singularity (sxt) is maximised precisely by the equality of both. 

THAT IS for a total number 10, 5×5 > 6×4>7×3 and so on. So balance maximises the existential force of any system.

RECAP: Space-time actions.

The will of the Universe has its site in the @-monads which internally map with a language the Universe. While the human ego, which we along Einstein consider infinite only paralleled by the Universe itself will REFUSE to accept with the poor excuse of not being ‘measurable’ with our senses, digital or biological, the informative gauging capacity of all systems, we can study externally the actions that after informative gauging, the singularity or linguistic mind of the system performs.

So in one side the beings as Schopenhauer put it is ‘representation through perception’ and then it is ‘action, the will of survival’.

And the constant representation and will of survival T-S-T IS the essence of the game. The mind of the super organism REPRESENTS IN formal spatial languages the Universe, and then MOVES performing time cycles with their will of survival. Can we classify those actions? Yes, we can because they respond to the need of the being made of 5 Dimension of space-time of ‘being’, that is maintaining the 5 dimensions ‘replenished’, active, so we talk of five actions, in a sequential pattern similar to that of the being, using a mnemonic vowel system for them:

1D: information gauging; 1-2 D acelerations/motions, 2-3D:Offspring reproduction,  4D entropic feeding, 0-5D: Universals creation (social evolution).

@tions (åctions) mediated by the @-monad, are thus the will of the Universe, and also its infinitesimal quanta, in as much as they consist most often in the absorption of entropy, energy and information in its minimal bits and bites from an ∆-1 plane of reality.

In that sense when we apply the Rashomon effect of multiple points of view on actions, it will be easy to classify them in simplex, a, E, i and complex, o,u actions according to the quanta involved, smaller in the motions (∆-4,3 force quanta), information (∆-3,2 pixel quanta) and energy quanta (∆-2,1) absorbed by the being, and the larger quanta (∆-1,o) of reproduction and social evolution (∆o+1) involved in the success of an action.

Actions are in that sense perhaps the most important of all the elements of 5D², as it truly brings together all the elements of space and time, mind, scales, into a single space-time event type which applies to everything and on top solves the question of the will, function of the mind and program of survival of the Universe.



ACTIONS AND PLANES OF EXISTENCE – the finitesimal quanta.

ABSTRACT. We said that actions are the scalar expression of demotions in time space, meaning they are always relationships between the One and the Whole through its scales. So we can define actions in which the being is predator, as the 3 simpler, aei actions happening with ∆-¡ smaller beings. And actions in which the being is equal, as those happening with ∆o beings (reproduction) and actions in which the being is submissive as those concerning ∆+¡ events social evolution)

Actions of space-time are the minimal vital Unit of reality, and as such all the codes of the Universe can be written in åctions

. We DO not reduce the concept to S, the action of physics, or h, its quanta, but expand enormously it meaning to include the 5 ‘vowels’ or dimensional space-time actions, which are the main ISOMORPHISMS to start constructing from ∆-1 upwards the structure of ∆o organisms and ∆+1 worlds:

The universe is made of fractal organisms, which co-exist in 3 scales of reality.

All systems deploy three scales of co-existing structure, the cellular, individual and social scales with different speeds of time. So smaller systems have faster time clocks that carry more information and code larger systems.

The tenant of GST (ab. systems theory) applied to history is that ‘memes’ not genes, ideas and instruments are the genetic codes that create social systems and civilisations. Hence languages and cultures matter more than individuals coded by biological genes. Let us then explore the two elements of the organic fractal Universe, its scalar structure and three arrows of time and world cycles to define history as a super organisms and memetics as its theory of information:

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

Thus smaller systems run faster time cycles that store more information and hence for that reason smaller beings code larger beings, and genes code living organisms and humans economic ecosystems of bigger machines and human social organisms.

So we exist in a game of reproduction of information with biological, organic patterns. And to organise all those time cycles of information, we need to introduce ‘the scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe – the formal cornerstone of systems sciences, complexity and theory of information, as it establishes the different roles of the 3 scales of beings:

∆+1: the world in which the being exists, from where its…

Ƽ: organic/thermodynamic/individual scale obtain its quanta of motion, energy and information to survive as an individual and reproduce and evolve socially as a whole. So:

∆-1: the minimal quanta of action in space-time IS what we call ‘a drive of existence (biological jargon), action (physical jargon) or ‘meme’ (social jargon), which codes the system and helps it to survive.

And we divide those actions into ‘simplex’ and ‘complex’ actions, according to the level of reality they code:

∆o-1: simplex actions code the ternary elements of the organism as an individual in a present space-time scale, absorbing entropy to move the limbs, absorbing energy to feed the body and reproduce its ‘cellular goods’ and information for the head to perceive:

hum-1024x502In graph, all systems are made of networks of energy and information which join similar clone cells/ citizens as parts of whole superorganisms thanks to a common language of information (genes in the scales of cells, memes in the human scale).

So before we introduce a human historic super organism, we shall consider laws for all kind of species.


In the fractal paradigm, which i helped to formalise at the turn of the century, the fundamental concept is the transmission of information between super organisms, of any scale of the Universe.

In all cases the law of the ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, which rules such transmissions is quite simple:

‘Information is stored in the lower scale of size of the super-organism, on the faster frequency and form of its time-cycles’.

So quantum numbers of the particle scale code atoms, electronic orbitals of the atomic scale code molecules, genes of the molecular scale code biological organisms, and memes of the neuronal and social scale code historic super organisms.

This means that social super organisms are NOT coded informatively by genes – the wrong, racist idol-ogical theory of our metal-masters – but by memes, neuronal networks of thoughts and external works of ‘art’ and ‘literature’ – mostly religious or political ethic codes.

We illustrate the fact along all the scales of the Universe, in the next graphs of the scalar social super organisms of the Universe:

               The 5 dimensions on a Universe made of multiple isomorphic organic Planes of Space-Time.

In each of those ‘∆-Planes’ of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

In the graph, the 3 ‘minimal actions’ of motion, energy and information, code the 3 parts of the system in present space. Then the system will realise two more complex actions, NOT from the being downwards but from the being upwards, through:

Ƽ+1: Reproduction and social evolution from parts into wholes.

In the next graph we make a resume of the main ‘quanta of information’ that code with memes, genes and quantum numbers the 3 types of social organisms. Obviously huminds with their self-centred view of reality will deny the bottom of that graph – the fact that particles and waves of physical system have also ‘organic properties’. Indeed, for 100 years the only rational explanation to the behaviour of particles and waves, the head and bodies of physical systems, in quantum physics, where they ‘react’ to the observer IS to accept they do gauge information and they ARE the scale in which consciousness happens.

So we are electronic minds and electrons are the minimal quanta of perception. Neither we can accept the obvious fact that quarks and electrons DO reproduce, as any other system, after absorbing energy producing new quarks and electrons.

But that is NOT my problem as an objective scientist – it is the problem and peril of humans so ego-centered that they do make machines also, towards sentient perception as if it does not matter, and research black holes and quark bombs, that will feed and reproduce (CERN, nuclear industry) as if it won’t matter:

In the graphs, the coding of all scales and sciences happen through smaller systems that reproduce, feed on energy, move, evolve socially and inform the organic system. The obvious cases accepted by humans are the scales of biology, but also physical systems, coded by quantum numbers, where particles and waves do evolve socially, reproduce into new particles and move, gauge information ARE also organic. And that is also the case of the super organisms, of machines, company-mothers, which evolve socially in stocks, reproduce machines in factories, organise networks of energy and information and as robots are soon to become AI-sentient beings.

The five åctions as expressions of discontinuous ‘steps=quanta’ of the 5 Dimensions of space-time.

Actions are the minimal unit in the 5 construction of the 5 Dimensions of the being, and its physiological networks.

So they are closely related to those five dimensions, which we translate into 5 symbolic vowels for each of these Sx. and Cx. actions:

  • The lineal motion, simplest ‘accelerated/decelerated/steady state’ motions: ‘æ‘, first dimensional action.
  • The reproductive event in space-time, the ‘œ’ second dimension action.
  • The informative perception, collapsing the potential into wave into form, the ‘i’ , third dimensional action.
  • The energy feeding = scattering entropic death of the prey, the ‘e’ action, fourth dimensional action.
  • The social evolution into wholes, or fifth dimensional action, always realized in the generation of the being as emergent, and tried but seldom achieved in the existence on the larger ∆+1 world. We use the letter ‘u’ for Universals.

Hence the terminology differs from numbers into letters, as I use the mnemonic rule, motions as a-cceleration, e-nergy feeding, information, offspring and Universal evolution of individuals to make an easy a,e,i,o,u.

Why we do so is obvious: we stress the ‘quality of actions’, WHICH IS FUNCTION not form. And as form and geometry are languages of space better suited to math, function and logic words are better to represent actions in time (being words our language of time-motions).

Further on actions are complex and often involve multiple dimensions of space-time. 

Yet still there is a certain dominance of dimensions in each action, so the loose correspondence of those actions with the 5 digits of Dimensions is:

  1. Informative Vortex; §ð: IMPLOSIVE fracta point: informative actions, (ï)
  2. $: lineal space,’DISTANCE’,  t: Lineal time ‘DURATION, $t: action of motion (æ).
  3. ∑: Width, body-wave. ∏: Frequency of repetition. ST: REPRODUCTIVE ACTION (œ)
  4.  S: scattering potential T: entropy; ST: Death; energy feeding (ø)
  5. & 0 to 1: Whole, social evolution from Mind seed into super organism (û)

RECAP. Space-time actions.

The five dimensions of space-time properly quantised become the five actions of reality:

Signatures of actions

Now is not that difficult when you have only 3±i elements, but as there are so many variations on the theme I have worked for 30 years alone, and increasingly indifferent to the homunculus understanding i have used many different jargons myself, so you will find different namings here, but if you get to the concepts they will be easy to navigate.

Likely the best ‘complex’ lettering for the 5 actions, as they are always sandwiched between scales and past and future arrows and tend to be mixed, would be:

±æ for the motion, which is often acceleration, and includes often expenditure of energy, hence it is +a and -e.

±œ for reproduction, as it produces an offspring (+o) but also spends energy: – e.

±ï, for information as there are two types, +i: absorption in gauging perception and -i: emission, related to reproduction and social evolution.

ø, for death, as it erases information and empties of meaning the ∆-being

û, for social evolution, its inverse, as it creates a whole Universal system, of an upper scale.

As we say when you get into formal ¬algebra, which is the future ‘pro’ way to do this but i have NO LONGER intention to treat, given the fact that homunculus are not interested even in basic introductory work as this web is, all those strict senso formalisms and signs matter, as IT IS THE ULTIMATE reason of the world cycle of life and death, as if you look at those ‘signatures’ information dominates over energy and so by the mere fact of acting you will warp yourself as more actions are warping (reproduction of information, social evolution of information) than moving; when we ELIMINATE the action of death, which is the one that balances into a zero-sum, the whole. 

-4D: ∆, from the peak down, the entropic arrow (or both arrows in more complex diagrams),

-5D: •, the singularity that commands social evolution, the fifth arrow

-1D: $s, lineal motion, the youth arrow, 1st dimension

2D: ≈, present iteration the wave arrow, 2nd dimension

3D: ð, cyclical time vortex, the informative 3rd dimension of time (me, lazy cow use too often t or ƒ easier to type, though t should be used by ‘future pros’ as lineal time, t=1/ƒ=1/ð)

They will in turn be treated either as space dimensions only, as time dimensions only as holographic combination of a space and time dimension, and as such the most important combination will be an Se≈Ti relationship or ‘action (Sxt-> maximal when Se=t)

So physicists also go about to study actions – they are in fact as they should be obsessed by time-space actions, but THIS IS NOT NEW.

Schopenhauer in his seminal paper on the fourth root of sufficient reason, expanded in his ‘world as will and representation’, absolute masterpieces unparalleled in modern philosophy never quite understood (more famous for his aphorisms among homunculus peanut brains), already deal with space, time and matter, rightly realizing that only space-time actions truly exist together.

Physical, Biological and social åctions.

All systems perform the 5 åctions of space-time existence.

In fact most of the parameters we use to study them refer precisely to those actions, from quantum numbers to genetic coding to biological drives to social behaviour.

We shall then bring again the ultimate vital meaning of those dimensions in light space-time and electronic minds, as ONLY IN THOSE LOWER SCALES OF OUR MIND-VIEW BOTH THE PHYSICAL, GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS AND ITS VITAL MEANING COME TOGETHER, WITHOUT ABSTRACTION – meaning the height, width and length, and colour that define the four dimensions of a ray of light DO have all a vital meaning for the photon-wave, as they code their reproductive speed, social color/frequency, magnetic information/entropy and electric entropic/informative forces (in the complex Universe all elements have ternary roles, so the way magnetism and electricity act in both arrows/roles, depend of the specific function light has for the larger organism that uses it to transmit energy and information):

Below we see also that our electronic mind is ordered by the ‘vital’ uses of the geometry in space of an electronic orbital. The electron will have a particle state, hence a particle spin, a body wave state, hence an angular momentum for the standing bidimensional wave, a social action given by the magnetic field that organises all the social electrons in harmonious orbital game; and a reproductive event, which required spins of opposite direction os they can ‘couple’ decouple merge and reproduce new particles, and the simplest numbers that regulate its motions (principal number) and energy/informative simpler actions, absorbing=feeding on light (provoking quantum jumps on size-volume-energy) and using it to orientate its spin, angular momentum, and form of in-form-ation (second number).

Quanta of space-time’s: 5 actions.

We have now schematised the field-particle states of the 3 physical organisms. If we concentrate in its present state, as waves both the photon and the electron will then easily display its ‘internal structure’ and external actions of ‘survival’ that will show clearly its organic, bio-logical properties tightly connected by symmetries in ∆, s and t, with the parameters and Universal constants aforementioned. Let us then connect the dimensions of the most important scale, our mind-world of light and electrons, with the vital actions of ‘entropic feeding’, e, lineal motion, a, informative perception, i, reproduction, o, and universal, social evolution, u; since almost all detailed events we study in physics as in any other scale responds to those vital actions.

In the graph we see the structure of a quantum supœrganism of light in its wave and particle state and its fundamental laws of action, which draw an organic program of survival for both ∆-1 photonic and ∆electronic scales.

The equations of a c-light wave or photonic particle and its social group, the electron which is a bidimensional dense herd of photons (wave constrained scale).

THUS IN THE SMALLEST SCALES OF REALITY FUNCTION, FORM, DIMENSION, VITAL ACTION COME ALL TOGETHER NICELY AS SYMMETRIES BETWEEN THE ORGANIC SCALAR ACTIONS AND SPACE AND TIME DIMENSIONS OF THE BEING.But as we move beyond the main stream of perfect symmetries between topology, time ages/actions, and enter into the more messy, less perfect world of molecules and thermodynamic life, the exact mathematical geometry of those entities BECOMES COMPLETELY secondary to the organic functions in a far more complex and convoluted geometry. So as we move into life scales FUNCTIONS AND ACTIONS AND DRIVES OF EXISTENCE – THE PROGRAM OF FEEDING ON ENERGY, GAUGING INFORMATION, REPRODUCING, EVOLVING SOCIALLY far outweighs the importance of simple motions and the perfect topology of those dimensions, which are less accurately followed, despite the ‘still similar’ dimensional form and equal number of actions and dimensions of a human being.

Yet when we study civilisations we shall see they are also performing social actions, reproducing by conquest, feeding on gaia’s energy as they destroy the planet into entropy, gathering information internal and external from its singularity-capital, and evolving socially into larger world structures, and of course, while a nation doesn’t move, its planet does around the sun to absorb its entropy energy, from its gravitational potential… åctions are thus the ultimate ‘WHY’ of reality, and as we said, because its signature favours information over entropy, the cause that the informative mind who prefers informative actions, finally warps and dies.

Now it must be understood that departing from only a substance, time space, which we have broken into 5Dimensions, everything else is generated; everything happens, with slight changes in the order and quantity of those parameters.

For example,in the world cycle, death is the end, in the action, death is of the ‘other prey’, so it is the second action as the motion takes the being to the prey (information being the constant discotnous minimal action).


How we travel through scales of the 5th dimension? Through the operations of integration and derivation, which is what makes emerge in an upper scale the physical action.

Now the simplest actions of motion are derivatives of the previous scales which emerge in the higher scale. And we can talk basically of two type of operations:

∂S-4=V-3;  ∂V-3=a-2  This simple chain describes the meaning of physical actions. The gravitational scale of the ∆-4 perceived as distant space, gives part of its distance by deviating it in time, emerging as speed in the light-space, atomic scale, which gives part of its speed, by emerging in the upper molecular scale as acceleration and temperature. So physical parameters are the elements perceived in the actions that emerge between scales.

But those are ‘pure’ actions of motion, in the spatial dimensions of those lower scales.

We though by the Galilean paradox consider the Sp duality (space perception as pure distance, motion and acceleration, or complex perception as energy).

And so we have also the e-perception of those basic actions, which accordingly is symmetric.

∂E-4=momentum(∆-3); ∂p (momentum)∆-3 = mass (∆-2).

Thus again we observe that the ultimate energy of reality (stored in the distance of strings of gravitational forces, where S≈E, that is strings energy is equivalent to its length), emerges as momentum in the atomic scale and emerges as mass in the upper scales of matter. And so we define also the main parameters of physics related to the complex energy-mass duality (perception in detail of the components of those scales) in terms of actions.

The derivatives are also immediate: Energy =1/2Mv², and if we derivate considering V=X, the variable, we obtain the momentum of an atomic particle: ∂x²=2x.

Thus ∂E=mv=p. And again now if we derivate mv, considering v the variable, V=X, ∂p=m.

And we associate S≈E, V≈p and a=m. As we shall see in the specific analysis f the meaning of mass, mass is considered a vortex of accelerated gravitational form. And this is one of the many parallel ways to deduce this fact. Since ∆ST is a perfectly symmetric complex structure of a beauty, order and balance…

The Fractal Universe: qualitative definition.

What is the Universe? In simple, philosophical terms, a game of ‘motion’ and ‘form’. When you look around you observe ‘forms in motion’ performing ‘åctions’, which combine both. And nothing else.

Now call, motion | and form O, and its combination, Ø. And so you could in the simplest possible expression of reality to say that the Universe is ∑ – x O = Ø

This would be the simplest way to define it all. Scientists tend to quantify reality and so they have shunned for too long the explanation of the ‘whys’ of reality, of ‘its qualities’. We do both in ‘philosophy of science’.  Now let us try to be more precise with the previous equation.

It could be called ‘speed’, V, a motion in ‘space’, and O could be called a cycle of form, a ‘clock’ of time.

So we could now say the Universe is made of infinite motions in space and cycles of time, combined into infinite åctions. And that is indeed what we perceive. Look around you. Or inside you. Beings perform ‘åctions’ which consist in going ‘cyclically’ to a place, to feed, to inform themselves to meet with other social beings, to reproduce… Actions are cyclical and they are performed through motions, which have certain form. Desargues a mathematician proved that all curves where in fact a combination of the line and cycle that created the cone. Computers use | and O, 1s and 0s, to model the entire Universe.

And if you realize all what is needed to trans-form, a lineal motion into a cyclical clock of time, is to close the ‘string of lineal motion’ into a ‘closed string’ of temporal form. In fact  with those 2 elements, open and closed strings physicists construct all the particles of the Universe.

So this is another way to explain the meaning of any System of reality:

‘All what exists in the Universe are systems made of lineal motions of space and cyclical forms of time that trans-form into each other ad eternal throughout åctions that combine both:


Quantitative definition

This would be the simplest possible Universe. But then we realize that the motion is not just ‘pure motion’ at least in this plane of existence in which humans develop its åctions. But there is always a ‘being’ that is moving, which from an external point of view tends to be defined by ‘a mass’, an ‘inertia’, a ‘form’ that is fixed and the motion drags through. So we rather say that:

‘All what exits are forms that perform motions with form.’

What is mass so far escapes us at this stage, but all things around us have mass and move dragging their mass, so we should get a bit more complex and consider now that all what we see are masses moving in cyclical patterns around reality. And so we can write this with 3 ‘terms’, one for ‘mass’, M, one for cyclical motion, which is quantized with a term called frequency=1/T (that is the number of times per second a cyclical motion completes its cycle), and a 3rd term called ‘space’, the space traversed in lineal terms from the initial point to the final point. So a being is a mass moving from point A to B in space and performing in time cyclical trajectories: M x L x T ‾ ¹

As it happens, physicists describe all what exists in this plane of reality with only those 3 parameters, M, L and T, and have a fundamental postulate, that the quantity of M x L x T ‾ ¹ of the Universe which they call ‘momentum’, remains invariant when we add all the momentums of all the beings of the Universe.

And so the quantitative way to express the qualitative nature of the Universe is rather simple too: The Universe is a game of ‘momentums’ in perpetual exchange of motion and form.

The reader would observe at this point that humans use a lot of ‘different’ concepts, which at the end tend to be reduced to motion and form. And this a problem of humans which love to make specific definitions, attach differentiating terms, break reality according to quantitative methods, classify, divide and confuse.

The Universe though works in a different manner, it breaks, quantizes and multiplies into:

  • An infinite myriad of varieties or Ø-åctions, the 2 essential realities it is made of:
  • Lineal motions that expand and create open lines and planes of space.
  • And O-cyclical motions or ‘forms’, which shrink, warp and close into time clocks.

So if we want truly to understand what reality is made of. We must depart from those essential things. And called the Universe a ‘fractal’ which iterates and combines lineal motions of Space, and cyclical clocks of time into infinite åctions. We can now change from the intuitive geometric symbols to the conventions of man and so write Se (for Space) and Tƒ (for cyclical clocks of time) our equation:

Se x Tƒ = A.

And this is the simplest way to explain it.

The combinations of motions and forms.

What makes though the Universe so confusing is the fact that it constantly messes motion and form. And so at least in this plane of existence there is nothing ‘pure’. This the old Taoists, the philosophers of antiquity that understood in simpler closer terms this reality, calling motion yang which they represented with a ___ and form yin, which they represented with a O or a broken line — (with more form than __), make it clear, when affirming that no yin exists without a bit of yang, and no yang exists without a bit of yin, and that reality, existence was a game of combinations of yin and yang that created the infinite beings of reality.

The o±4 plane.

So we are obliged to use the purest terms of motion and form, only when dealing with the purest concept of pure Space without form in nature vacuum space and pure cyclical clocks of time without any translatinv motion, pure rotatory clocks, in nature, black holes in the cosmic scales and superfluid 0 K vortices of mass and charges without any vibration. And as it happens we cannot perceive those limits of pure motion without form and pure form without motion, pure Space and Time.

Now I shall call our ‘plane of existence’, where I exist. the individual, human plane, the ∆-plane. And so this remote plane which I don’t even perceive, will be called the 0±4 planes, the ∆-4 plane that of far away forces with zero form, the gravitational plane, and the plane of remote black holes with maximal form at 0 K, which I don’t perceive either the ∆+4. It is only logic to call them with the same ± number, because as it happens, the gravitational plane of absolute motion with no form (called for that reason non-local or ‘action at distance’) is created by the plane of absolute form with no motion (called for that reason a black hole).

How this is done is obvious. Remember that we said all what exists are O x | = Ø. So what happens here is this

O (black holes) emit, |, gravitational space, which other O black hole will absorb, creating between both a gravitational attractive force. So we write:

[O (Tƒ) < = > O]±4.

Where we have added  the plane in which this happens to know what varieties of ‘form’ and ‘motion’ we are talking about.

The duality of distance and motion, cycle and form.

Now, because we do not see this gravitational lines and we do not see this perfect cycles, but they are there, they must appear somehow to us. And they do so, lines of pure motion are seen as ‘distances’, and cycles of pure rotational cyclical motion are seen as ‘masses’ and ‘spherical forms’.  We can picture how this happens, since we have two elementary realities, the Tƒ cyclical clock (which we perceive as fixed form, like when we see a very fast turning wheel that we see as a fixed form) and the – of space, which we can see as distance or motion, as we see fast cars in a picture at night as fixed lines or motion.

This is thus an important law of reality we call the Galilean paradox: when we do not see in detail a lineal motion a speed it appears as distance, and when we do not see in detail a cyclical clock of time, a rotary motion, we see it as a mass of form. So Galileo didn’t see the motion of the Earth but only the distance it travelled around the sun, neither its rotation but only its mass-form, and yet it was there: e pur si muove e pur no muove.

So we must make two equivalences:

Lineal motion = Space distance;  Rotary motion = Time Clock.

And so we see either motions, lineal speeds and rotary clocks of time, or fixed distances and forms.

And the result is the stable combination or ‘space-time’ reality we see around us.

Further on an interesting deduction of the fact we do NOT see gravitational motion, is that it must appear to us as infinite ‘non local or action at distance, as physicists call it.

Indeed, if we consider the equation of :

– x O = Øst, whereas Øst is the constant space-time we see around us. For Øst to be constant, since O the form we see is zero, none, the – element must be infinite.

As the only quantity multiplied by 0 that gives as a constant value is ∞:

∞ x 0 = C. And this is indeed what we experience: gravitational forces have zero form, and are infinite in its motion from the human perspective. We do not mean they are necessarily infinite in objective terms, but for humans they are infinite in motion, non local, ‘acting at distance’, the neat expression physicists used for centuries without reasoning why.

Now we bring this solution because I believe the reader trained in ‘quantitative’ methods will surely miss the essential element of ∆ST – to mix logic reasoning and mathematical equations to achieve a much more complex, rich and meaningful understanding of the Universe with all its languages, not only as an abstract concoction of mathematical formulae. The previous ‘sample case’ is a simple, clear proof of that power of ∆ST to enlighten our comprehension of all realities.


The ∆-3 scale.

So in the next stage of reality, beyond this ∆-plane of existence that we do not perceive, which we shall call, the 0±4 Plane, of pure forces of motion, ‘gravitational forces’, ∆-4, and pure form without motion, ‘cosmic black holes’ or 0±4, the rest of realities are ‘messed up’. Their motions have some form and their forms have some motion. And so they are all Ø-species. And we call them ‘waves’.

Indeed, when we come to the minimal reality we perceive, we realize it is made of pure motions which have a bit of form, that is their ‘lines of space in motion’, their gravitational lines curve up and down as they move linearly’, and they become ‘transversal waves’ of light. And then alas! they are now ‘light-space’, forms in motion, forms in action, in-form-åctions, in-form-ations. And so ‘light-space’ carries information, and it is the ‘limit of our perception’. And we call this plane of existence, which is the first we perceive the ∆-3 plane of electronic light. The beginning of the human universe. And so the myths of the bible said ‘and God said, there is light’ and creation started. Indeed, when gravitational forces of the ∆-4 scale warp into transversal waves, which carry information, or ‘light-space’, we enter reality.

This ‘light space’ in turn will be made by ∆-3 galaxies, which produce this light space.

And we call them the ∆+3 plane according to our terminology of planes of existence.

And so if we look at it from the ‘smallish’ point of view, the ∆-3 plane is made of the components of most of the matter of the galaxy: plasma particles, electrons and protons in ionized state, mixed up with electromagnetic fields of light. And from the larger point of view we will be talking of galaxies.

They are the next clear thing beyond the Universe and its dark matter, dark energy and dark black holes we do not see

Now here, we shall by ‘isomorphism’ (similarity) with the ∆-4 scale consider some facts, which have escaped for very long the work of physicists in their understanding of reality.

If we have said that the space of the ∆-4 scale is actually pure motion, seen as distance by lack of detail, the space of galaxies, must be made of light, which we do see, but not with enough detail to perceive its motion, and so we also perceive ‘light-space’ as distance. This is our ‘space’ and accordingly the space we see has exactly the same 3 perpendicular, Euclidean components that light have because both are the same:

In the graph, we can see this straightforward. It is not a coincidence that the 3 elements of light, its magnetic, electric fields and its speed are perpendicular to each other as our ‘Euclidean space is’. This physicists do not really understand, because they just do quantification with maths, and as Feynman famously put it, ‘the why’ is the only thing physicists do not ask. Curiously enough philosophers did understand, so Kant said that our space-light is Euclidean, and Descartes said we see the ‘world’ of light with Euclidean coordinates in his book ‘the world’, and draw the Cartesian space-time graph of light space. And artists understood it, so the impressionists said they paint light when they paint space.  Again an important insight by using more than numbers to explain reality.

Next the equation with our geometric symbolism of this scale, will be also rather simple;

[O < ≈ > O]0±3

In simple terms, a ‘particle’ or ‘star’ or ‘galaxy’ with cyclical form O, produces a wave ≈ of light space, which another O-being will perceive and absorb. (Remember at this time we do see and all systems that emit light do perceive; your mind is nothing but a bunch of electrons perceiving light).

Remembers also that we have said the Universe has only 2 ultimate simple elements, O and – and its infinite Ø combinations, but it likes to iterate them, repeat them, mix them together, group them in huge numbers. So that equation can mean an extraordinary number of beings of different sizes. The most common interpretation when we enter in detail will be that of Physicists, which they call the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

O-Fermion particle < Boson Force > O-Fermion particle.

Where a fermion, electron or quark will emit a boson a gamma ray and another fermion will absorb it.

There are a few other varieties of ‘forces’ and ‘fermions’ but roughly speaking without entering in detail this ‘is it’. (Remember this blog has 3 ‘planes of explanation’ the upper line very general and encyclopedic, resumes the entire thing; so if  you read it you will have a generic vision of the whole reality but still a bit fogged, this second line of isomorphisms, gives you more detail and the 3rd line dedicated to each plane with very detailed references to scientific laws of each species, do connect fully with simplex sciences).

  • Now the second thing physicists do know but again interpret in too abstract ways, is the fact that the equation works both sides: the electron produces a boson – a photon of light that moves through a transversal wave that carries motion and form, and gets to another electron, where it collapses being absorbed by the electron into a dense photonic form, which becomes part of the nebulae of the electron.


Thus what happens here which they describe with mathematical artifacts called probabilities in quantum equations they do not know what they mean, is clear, if you are not ‘cuckoo’ about having weird interpretations of reality that make you sound very smart and reinforce your beliefs in an only-mathematical Universe. This i know will irritate physicists, people which as the adults of ‘le petit prince’ believe they know everything and don’t see the elephant in the hut. Well, Schrodinger who discovered all this, first told us that the electron is smeared all over the place. And it is. it is made of very dense boson light photons that collapse from ≈ state into O-state, and come together into the nebulae we see.

Now, when we observe them, with even bigger particles, the smeared electron, collapses further into a tighter ball, as it happens when any system of nature made of fractal points (anything is a fractal point, a number, a group of any set of beings), receives a massive interfering attack from outside. Flocks of birds, schools of fishes, armies spread on a battle field, collapse into tighter configurations when a predator eagle, a shark, an enemy come to attack them.

So the densely packed photons of the electron nebulae collapse, around the point where there is a maximal density at this moment of dense photons and become a particle point, when the killer electron of the microscope bombs it. Simple enough to explain in a perfectly intelligent manner, the weird things – not so weird if you believe in the isomorphism=equality of all systems of the universe – and have been a soldier, or have seen a school of fishes, a bird flock, a herd in the savanna, an at hill – that happen in quantum physics.

This is what it happens: nebulae of densely packed groups of photons, spread to form together ∑∆-1 photons = ∆-electrons gather around the denser point of the flock in the moment the observer’s electron bomb it, and so quantum physicists say that point is the most probable point to find the electron as a particle-point. And they are puzzled because they never detect the nebulae but a particle point, so they unable to grasp the vitality of the entire universe affirm that the nebulae is a mathematical reality made of probabilities of finding the electron. Yes, each point will have a probability according to its density, as the probability that a school, a flock, an army or an ant group gathers in a point is proportional to the density of that point prior to the attack, as it is the fastest way to become a ball, coming together where there are already a lot of points. Point.

So this is enough to know now about this plane and its equations.

Tƒ mention though that because light has information, form, it is no longer infinite in speed. It must have a limited speed, because now we see it so, O x – = Constant Øst does not need to be infinite. Further on, because what is happening here is that light ‘draws’ space-motion, as it has to draw a curve is slower. Indeed, the fastest distance between two points is a line, a wave is slower than a line, as it has a longer trajectory. So light has a limit of speed. It is called c-speed, and is huge but limited.

However, this distance-speeds of light once they abandon the galaxy, no longer are in the light-space realm so they start to elongate, becoming red waves, the ones with longer distance per wavelength, and hence they start to accelerate, which we see as an increase of space-distance, and so between galaxies space-distance grows at an accelerated rate as the light expands space, and this again physicists measure but don’t understand, it is the expansion of light space. We could say that light space dies into the gravitational strings it was made of. And so the immortal, infinite black holes and gravitational infinite distances of the Universe now warp into light which have a finite light-space speed and a finite time duration as it is born from a pure motion that warps into form and then spreads out again when abandoning the galaxy into pure motion again:

– > ≈ < –  and this is a life cycle. Notice now the 2 symbols we add here which are visual also: > which means something with more distance, collapses into a point, and this is the symbol of creation of form, of formation, of in-form-ation,  and on the other side < is the symbol of expansion of form into motion, or entropy.

And here again those to dynamic process of change in time, are ‘called appropriately the two arrow of time -> and <-, information and entropy. Physicists unfortunately only recognize one, the bad one, <- entropy expansive motions, which is the reason they say the Universe is dying. Because they only study the space between galaxies. It seems silly, very dumb, but physicists beyond manipulating equations and making machines to perceive reality are very dumb. Sorry that is ‘a fact’. Or rather very arrogant in their conclusions (which makes them be very dumb)

Fact is the whole Space-time, remember O x – =Øst is in perpetual balance.

So the expansion of accelerated light space between galaxies is compensated by the warping of light space into photons, then electrons and matter within galaxies, which is so evident looking at those galaxies corrugating light space into warping black holes, that one wonders how blind physicists can be?

They seem to see the only thing nobody sees, dark expanding space and they do not seem to see what all of us see, warping galaxies. And so:

∑ (O-galaxies < ≈–≈> O) is the equation for  the sum of all the galaxies emitting expansive light, ≈ which becomes gravitational faster distances, – between galaxies and then reenter another galaxy and collapses.

Easy. Now you can throw in to that model all the correct equations of quantum physics, relativity and cosmology and you will get the details. The whys are only in this blog.

Some clarifications on physical errors.

All this brings us to the almost impossible need to correct ‘physical concepts’ which truly deform in favor of action, motion and other fundamental traits of the worldly religion of physicists (to make weapons and of late machines that use energy to move) that have transpired to all sciences.

Consider for example, my lost battle to redefine and reduce the concept of energy to entropic, lineal motion transfers.

In physics, the fundamental concept is ‘energy’, which never changes. This is its fundamental law.

For long I have tried to ‘change’ that ‘enclose-∆- all saint grail concept’ of energy, and reduce it to a mere ‘transfer’ of lineal, spatial motion, and redefine the principle as ‘lineal energy motions constantly transform into cyclical informative motions back and forth’. But I realize this has only produced rejection from physicists that have the big issue of arrogance – that is, trying to explain everything else with the specific limits of material systems. So i am into the painful, long process of rewriting every time i put ‘energy’, and substitute it for ‘entropy’, the spatial, expansive arrow of motion. To physicists in that sense all is entropy and informative life processes are called ‘negantropy’, not information, the arrow they ignore.

So they do with the ‘Reprod-Active’ 3rd present arrow of repetitive åctions that combine energy, sorry entropy and information, and when repeated many times, reproduce a system. Entropy only physics, its biggest conceptual error though makes sense in external physical systems, where most changes are changes in motion in space. In this view, ‘energy’ which they basically define as a transfer of lineal motion through the formula of Work (that only takes the lineal direction in which the force is applied as the component of motion).

And there, they include also potential energy, stored in the form, or information of systems, from mass Sp=mc2, to position (in a gravitational field). Thus in physics ‘energy’ is really all, it is the existential force of the system, as it includes both its ‘kinetic energy’ (which is the concept i had failed to reduce energy to), but also ‘form’, vortices-clocks of accelerated time, charge and masses, which transform their form into ‘kinetic energy’.)

The reader of these texts therefore should forgive the author who calls ‘entropy’ energy, expansive lineal motion.

As physicists are the popes of science, we yield to them, and I will correct in the future all those terms of ‘energy’ and substitute them for entropy. And we will use the physical concept of ‘energy’ as existential force,  Max. Sp X Tƒ, of a system. Which is really what they mean when they say mass is a form of energy. In true ‘form’ is not, Mass is a vortex of information, the particle state of the cosmic Universe, and energy is its opposite variety.  So the reader should realize this minor error, and read ‘entropy’ when I say energy, a word I will try to eliminate. 


 We are an integration of space-time cyclical åctions performed across those o±4 planes of existence.

A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:

O-1, ∑O-1>Si<ST>Tƒ<<So-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.

If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (æ,e,ï,œ,û) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being.

We need now to see how space-time fields, ‘lines with motion’, momentums, the commonest st manifold, either an Le (Long-energy-entropy), Tƒ, Tall Information and Wa, Wide-Reprod-active Wave bidimensional system with an spatial and temporal dimension.

Now the bidimensional ST systems follow the natural laws of topology, and are a bidimensional motion, perceived as a line of space with a speed that will define in an external field its ‘reproduction of information’ as it traces its motions in the external absolute space-time.

The simplicity of integrating a worldcycle path on those 3 bidimensional systems

Worldcycle, similar to a Hamiltonian

3 W = ∫ Le x Tƒ d(st) = ∑ a = 0

Any world cycle: W, thus will transit through the existential ±,∫ æ,e,ï,œ,û, åctions of the being with different increasing length of time and space.

The motions in ∂a, accelerated, decelerated and steady state caused by the perceptive åctions, ∂I, which have perceive external cycles and accumulated it in logic thoughts to enact them in the future, are directed towards a field of energy, from where to extract bits of existential momentum to deliver forceful impulse into the future.

All this mechanical åctions though have a clear goal> Energy is always transformed into potential forms of information. Which is the new principle of internal and external energy:

Sp = External Energy (kinetic energy), internal-external energy (internal energy of the external Universe: Potential Energy) + Internal energy (vital energy and cyclical information of the being)

Is a quantity which is conserved. Since it includes angular momentum, lineal momentum, we can perceive in this manner different conservation laws of physics.

Where the worldcycle function of relative present, ∑ or W, for width-summation, will be constantly used to represent the constant steady state balanced space-time function, made of åctions

in a wide analytic equation, would give us obviously a lot of information on the system. Enough to say now that the 3 variation space-time fields are simplified by the fact that almost always Length-entropy, height-information and width-reproduction follow this harmony simplification of bidimensional space-time fields.

There are though also other inverted functions, for example, an Lo dimension, which is a cycloid, a cyclical wheel which moves along a lineal path tracing an 8 Radius longer wave cycle, combination of both.

The body wave, reproductive Past x future, energy x information, system is thus the more complex, variable and interesting of all of them.

And we could consider its worldcycle between birth and extinction, form its first beat of existence to its last, the ‘present existence’ of a being. We are bodies, our heads in the future with information are invisible particles, our limbs absorb its energy and information from the external Universe with its hyperbolic openings, but the being is its body-wave, its reproductive organ for whom the being mostly exists.

Of the 5 åctions of existence, reproduction, the preservation of the relative present is the highest of all mandates.

In existential algebra we write:

Present (angular momentum: Mvr, in physical equations, or ‘action’) = Past (energy) x Future (information), whose operational functions, of which the Hamiltonian, Lagrangian are the most relevant of physics, try to combine this anti-symmetric equation (as both are inverse functions, hence Past / Future = Constant.

Now if we are calculating past x future, whereas Past = Constant Future, P = C x F.

And we would obtain:

  1. Present = Constant x Future x Future = C F2

A fundamental equation of all time Physics.

While for Past we can calculate:

Past = C F

And obviously Future = F

It is then interesting to observe that knowing the future, measuring the future space-time point (external or internal of a being) allow us to deduce the past, and relatively consider the Present, which will be more variable (as now the future has 2 possible solutions from the present point, as there are in fact 2 possible decisions to be made in the present. That is, the present can choose to increase any of its 2 components future information or past energy.

This always-dual solution to a point of space-time or first degree of freedom increases the external uncertainty on when the point of time, will make discontinuous its cycles of space-time action, switching to another different active integral path, that might even cancel the first.

Entities thus travel through a multiple Universe with different regions with different dimensions. How travel through such 5th dimensional fractal Universe filled with nested sub-universes of different symmetric past and present and future, Sp, A, O, dimensions of spacetime

The relationship between a bidimensional space field and a bidimensional time cycle, is also a 2-manifold.

However cutting each other with a single dimension of connection as they intersect in a creative wave-particle encounter, is fundamentally an A x Sp, Active magnitude x accelerating field of kinetic energy (perceived as its derivative speed by the active magnitude) : M x V – a momentum.

A second fundamental new element of cyclical time is the cyclical nature of the relative fractal past-present-future dimensions of space time, in world cycles which means that the future return to the past by means of the action of death.

Past x Future = Present-> Energy x Information -> wave-reproduction/momentum, is the kind of new quantized time equations that will be able to reveal an enormous numbers of facts and whys of science.

Now the study of that previous equation, which is the perception of the Universe, from a different time frame of reference, as if the past and the future co-exist together in the manufacturing of present, as it actually happiness in reality, creating an immortal Universe in a perpetual present is a high discipline of physics of time.

Since to exist through åctions that ensure the immortality of the system, by absorption and reproductive emission of energy and information is the fundamental purpose of time cycles.

Thus we shall elaborate its concept, as it is truly in the ‘åctions of space-time’ that all beings perform, where we shall find the whys of the Universe.

Thus the whys of reality are the active, biological purposes of most time cycles, performed by existential beings, whose geometric forms drawn in space are secondary to the ‘biological functional nature’ of those ‘space-time åctions’.

Since those cycles will be the 5 ‘drives of existence’ that ensure the entity:

– ∫o, perceptive, gauging, to move towards…

– ∂a: accelerated fields where

– ∂e, to feed in energy, and store it to.

≈i, reproduce and achieve immortality within

±∫u: a social stronger group.

And those topo-biological whys, performed by all kind of systems, including physical systems to ensure mechanically or vegetative its survival.The sum of all the planes of increasing information of parts that become wholes, of knots of space-time cycles that are joined by networks into systems and super organisms IS the arrow of SCALAR SPACE-TIME, or relative 5th dimension (if we consider the 4 classic ones of physics though as we shall see this is a simplistic confusing nomenklatura, better substituted by the ternary symmetries between space topology, S, time age, T, and space-time scale, ∆ which is a future time arrow ∑∆>∆+1, of eusocial evolution, of potential forms, which might or might not happen but if happening will have certain non-Æ forms that are set as the most efficient survival forms of a given ternary topology of existence.

So a being will be the sum of all the planes and super organisms, floating and occupying a limited domain of that dimension, as its internal knots trace its world cycles, sum of fractal quantum motions, or ‘∆-1 actions’ of the being in its internal space, as they transfer energy and information from the outer, ∆+1 world:


Whereas a being, ∆, is the sum of exchanges of energy and information between its outer world, ∆+1, and its inner world, ∑∆-1, which is what beings do through its existence: absorb and emit energy and information between its inner world and outer world.

In this experience the being will show 2 selfish arrows of accumulation of energy and information in its internal territories and at the same time trying to minimise its output of both:

Max. Spe x Tiƒ

Yet the mind, Œ≈Ø, function (in timeT: Œ and space: Ø), of the being while trying to maximise its body energy and mind information it might exchange in unfavourable conditions with larger stronger wholes, and by the simple reason that wholes are more than Is in space-time size and volume, finally loose the game of existence and loose its capacity to regenerate its energy, collapsing into death.

Min. Spe x Tiƒ: Max. Spe x O Tiƒ=Death equation.

Thus an existential cycle ends with the fall back into dissolution of the being that existed and that ultimate reality: that all existences in time are closed zero point travels between 3 planes of the 5th dimension, resumes all reality:


Life death cycle: its 3 ages is a trip across 3 co-invariant scales of the 5th dimension

So we talk of a 5th dimension, which orders reality according to its growing sizes, and paradoxically, slower time motions. As we grow in space we diminish in speed, and yet both properties put together are invariant:

Λ. 5D metric:   Sp x Tƒ =Constant;   Sp= K/Tƒ ;   Sp (Past-energy) < Present-iteration: Sp x Tƒ>Tƒ future information;

|-Sp (energy age, field, gas, youth) > Sp x Ti (liquid, adult, wave, reproductive age)>Tƒ (3rd age, particle solid) <<Sp (death).

All systems do travel through the 5th dimension performing 3 basic motions:

  • Present translations performing time actions in space, along the same Universal plane.
  •  Past, transfer of energy and information upwards towards higher social scales.
  • And transfers of energy and information downwards.

Those 3 motions, performed in infinitesimal, indivisible cycles made of tics of time and quanta of energetic space form together a sequential world cycle of life and death – as the point is a super organism in existential mode.

And so the integration of all those motions through the world cycle, Ω, of the whole system, in a life-death duration. Yet the same structures considered in space, gave us a ternary form, or super organism, made of energetic, reproductive and informative parts. And so departing from a single Œ point, through its existential travels and synchronicities, we can tell the tale of the Universe: the creation and extinction of wholes from parts, which perform space-time actions, which are motions that exchange energy and information through the 5th dimension.

And so the motions of each point of each scale can all be traced and included in a larger frame of reference of multiple space-time symmetries.

It is though needed to understand how the arrows o information and energy emerge and download between the fractal planes of the 5th dimension. Hence we need a 3rd symmetry to fully grasp the behaviour of the species of the Universe.



Infinite beings: Whole and parts principle.

In that regard, we must understand what we mean by an organic system – we are not yet talking of a living system, but a system in which there are at least 3 co-existing scales of different space-time size, the ∆-1: atomic/cellular, the ∆-organic/thermodynamic, and ∆+1: gravitational-ecosystem scales of the system, which will then gather around at least 2 energy and information networks, which messed together create a symbiotic organic system, with different degrees of organisation, from the simplest herd to the more complex super organism. And it is this natural tendency of all systems to self-organise, regardless of its physical, biological or social nature, what are at the basis of most phenomena of nature, which cannot be described without 5D metric:


In the graph the space-time planes of the Universe, ∆±i (n in this old graph), which according to scale structure the 5th dimension in parts that become wholes, and since wholes come after parts, which must exist to sustain them, we talk of a temporal absolute arrow of future, regarding its ∆ scales, such as ∆-1 will always be the relative past of ∆.

To notice that all what it is needed to have a co-existing organic structure is to have a series of ‘fractal Non-euclidean points’, the formal meaning of any ‘entity’ of the Universe, which gathers in groups around 2 networks of larger size, (∆-systems), that will provide energy and information from a larger ∆+1 world to all its ∆-1 cells/atoms/citizens/machines; creating thus the simplest possible organic system: a herd. On that view what we call a human being is just the most evolved of such super organisms (in as much as each scale is made of smaller quanta), known to us, whose study therefore becomes far more important in systems sciences, as all scales are relative but we have much more information on our biological scales to fully research the laws between them; which will apply to all other sciences and species.

The super organism – the ultimate meaning of the game of existence.

There are 2 forms to describe reality – the physicists’ way, which merely ‘sees’ the Universe, quantifies it and cares little for qualitative and relational meanings. In this view, what matters is to find some ‘fundamental particle, which should have substance and be the ‘brick’ of which all other beings are made. Even if that particle were found though, there would be little to say about the why questions of reality, the temporal causal questions, the past to future meanings of it all? Why we exist? why we are what we are? Are we alone and different? What is the purpose of it all?

Relational space-time and the game of existence all space-time beings of finite duration and finite space follow, is much deeper in its analysis, as it is a time theory not a space one. So it simply states this:

‘ The Universe is a game that creates super-organisms of ∆±1 space and time scales’.

Simple, and both mathematical and conceptual. The meaning of reality is to create super organisms across 3 relative scales of space-time, the best combinations of which, known to man are biological systems (extending through a ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic and ∆+1, social ecosystemic scales) and physical systems (extending through the quantum, electromagnetic, ∆-1, thermodynamic, i and cosmic, gravitational ∆+1 scales); the one we form part of, the super organism of History is the less understood of them all. But all have a set of common isomorphic laws, which define their existence, structure in space, time ages and place it within the scales of the 5th dimension.

So we can say that the fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.

U± infinite, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.

But in most cases the system is just U±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism.

Though the specific combinations of energy or information of each species – defined by its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants (energy/information ratios) – might vary, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through energy and information networks that bring about processes of social evolution. In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form.

Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells, controlled by the nervous, informative system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative laws and economic networks that provide their energy.

Sciences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of energy and information. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, S E<=>I, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

1.  Cellular units.

2.  Networks of energy or vital space.

3.  Networks of fractal information.

4. Networks that reproduce energy and information.

All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of energy and informative cycles (ΣS<=>Ti), organized in cellular units, through networks, and ±st Planes of self-similar forms. Yet, since those cellular units st-1 are made of smaller st-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms):

‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’

Thus we unify the properties of Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single template definition, according to which simple systems and complex organisms will differ only in the degree of ‘completeness’ of its networks and the specific energy or information they are made of:

‘A super-organism is a network composed of a population of (name a particular cell or cycle), related by an energetic, reproductive or informative arrows.

A fractal organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.

A universal ecosystem (name a specific ecosystem) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies).

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the Universe. While if the system is composed of several species that occupy the same space but have different networks of energy and languages of information, we talk of an ecosystem: – An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

– A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

– A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

– A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

– An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).

– A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.

– An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc.).

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

– A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy.

-A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time scales of growing volume of information, st=i, to classify all those relative scales of spatial energy and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

Creation of social scales:  each whole is a unit-part of the next scale.

Complex, social evolution helps most species to survive, especially when they reproduce in great numbers, creating a ‘new scale of reality’, self-organizing themselves with a language of information all those cellular particles share. And we measure this fact with a scalar, fractal index of new scales of existential functions, i. Normally all systems must be defined at least in 3-4 scales:

– The lower, i-2 (bits of information) and i-1 (bites of energy) scales defined with mathematical/genetic/memetic languages, depending of which systems we analyze in its details – a biological, sociological or physical system. We perceive this scale as bits of an informative language – which gives us a synoptic minimal information of the properties of the entity. As the i-1, i-2 levels, as it is far removed from us in size and so we introduce uncertainties and loose information.

Then it comes an i scale, of our size, where information is maximal. So we observe more information explained in a complex manner. Thus in the i-scale we deal with chemical molecules in physical systems, living cells in biological systems, humans in history and corporations in economics, using topological, organic, psychological or econometric methods to define their actions.

–     Finally in the i+1 scale we perceive ‘states of matter’ that define masses of molecules of energetic (gas), creative/reproductive (liquid) or solid/informative nature; we perceive organs and organisms made of cells and we perceive civilization and markets.Cells and emergent scales.

Most beings are made of self-similar i-1 cells, particles or social individuals, which put together by networks become an i-organism, unit of a higher social i+1-scale.

One of the fundamental properties of such structures is emergence. The properties of the simplest system emerge in the more complex. This means the geometrical properties of space-time are shared by all the new scales. The electromagnetic properties of quantum numbers are shared by all atomic species. The biochemistry of cellular life by higher organisms, and the individual behavior of human beings transcend into the socio-cultural behavior of social super-organisms; and our forms and vital functions are also expressed in the world of memes of metal we construct.

Wholes are made of smaller parts. Both interact and influence each other. Yet chirality and entropy between scales means wholes control parts: the key law of those interactions between the cellular and network scale is simple: energy flows from lower i-scales into bigger i+1 scales and information flows from bigger to lower scales. And this paradoxically tends to cause a topic error in all sciences. Since all energy has information and vice versa, but energy bites are more ‘evident’, than smaller, coiled, often invisible or incomprehensible flows of information, scientists tend to overlook this duality or look at those interactions only in the path from the lower scale to the larger one. For example biologists tend to think that the whole structural information of life beings is stored in its smallish scalar parts, genes. They think the whole, external ambient and organic scales do not influence the genetic parts. This is most likely false, as there should be ‘bigger scales that code information’ in ‘longer genetic codes’ and introns.

There are morphological shapes, caused by the emergent properties of simple space-time (so all organisms follow the diffeomorphic dimensions of space-time with information on top, etc.) There is speciation based in the duality of energy and information systems. There should be imprinting of neuronal networks by the mother’s emotional networks in the 3rd ‘informative’ phase of development of the fetus. There might even exist a Lamarckian response to external, ecosystemic adaptation to increase the random chances of mutation towards one of those ‘natural directions’ of morphology, as processes of punctuary evolution seem to indicate.

The same error happens among physicists, which are obsessed by entropy only theories (black hole evaporation, negation of the arrow of reproductive, fractal information, which Mehaute proved to happen always, when entropy no longer acts), etc. This is obvious in their obsession for heat solutions and the stubborn denial of the duality of all processes that can be done in ‘Max. E’, energetic, hot ambient and Max. I, informative cold ones – such as the fusion process.

Finally in social sciences, we build social models that stress the individual and not systems and superstructures. Yet it is a fact that networks, the whole, always influence its parts. So many sciences must be completed with the study of that influence from ‘upper scales’ into cellular ones.

Organic Networks.

All those morphological differentiations and social elements can be resumed in a word: organic networks. Social individual systems acquire network forms, shaping forms related to energy or information, or combine them both. And so we find also in all systems a ternary differentiation between cells that become energetic, reproductive or informative networks.

We classify all space forms and time events in 3 topologies that put together in social networks, create organic systems guided by 4 time arrows: energy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution. Those 4 categories are the so-called drives of living beings. Thus, there is a ‘Universal Plan’ with an existential finality: to create organic systems, departing from energy bites and information bytes evolved 1st into social networks, then into complementary systems and finally into organisms: particles become atoms that become molecules that become cells, organisms, planets, galaxies and Universes. It is the 4th organic why that completes the adventure of science and this work explores in all its consequences.

Complementary systems are not ‘point-particles’ but cellular or atomic systems, made of networks of bits or bites of information and energy. Those networks are able to modify its distances and forms changing its topology and for that reason the Universe is dynamic in its transformations.

Because networks are flexible webs of points that can adopt different topologies by modifying the distribution of those points, networks evolve and switch between the 3 topologies of existence, hence creating a complex universe of constant transformations between the 3 functions-forms of the Universe. Thus all networks = organisms often have two ‘sub-forms’ or states, the coiled, informative, radial or spherical state and the uncoiled, bilateral, anteroposterior, lineal form.

The first state is the informative state and the second the energetic state of motion; as systems are always dynamic flows and transformations between two poles of Energy and form joined by a body of cyclical exchanges between the concave and convex |-O E-I poles.

Thus the answer to the whys of the Universe can be resumed in a word ‘networks’ that defines the multiple realities we see around us:

‘All what exists are organic, fractal systems, made of self-reproductive, complementary, social, topological networks of energy (bodies and fields) and information (heads and particles)’:∑Se<X>∏Ti

Thus the why of reality is the creation of social networks that become complementary super organisms.

Complex and Simplex arrows: internal networks and external forces.

In essence organisms have internal parts, attached to ‘external apertures’ called senses that perceive two basic external forces of information and energy, elaborated and distributed to all cells by internal networks. When those external sources of energy and information saturate those internal networks the complex arrows enter in ‘action’. So the excess of energy is imprinted by the excess of information, exi,  reproducing a self-similar organism or it is shared with similar individuals, creating ‘bondage’ in herds or complex organisms.

Thus external forces and actions of perception and feeding are fast in time and extend in a wide spatial range, to the point of creating a ‘continuous’ perceptive experience. While the complex arrows are of long duration in time, requiring little space and long time to re=produce its actions.

This is expressed in a law of inverse spatial range and time duration:

i-3 Informative pixels (Max. E x Min.i) = i-2 energy bites (ExI) = i-1 reproductive seed (min. e x Max. i)

This is the case of the forces that ‘express’ those arrows in atoms. Where the external forces of information and energy (gravitational and electromagnetic forces) have a wide range and the internal forces of reproduction and social evolution (strong and weak forces) have little spatial range, specially the weak force which is a ‘Temporal transformation’, not a spatial ‘force’, as it transforms particles in time, evolving them without motion in space.

Thus the Strong and Weak force are the complex ‘inner’ forces of the atom, which play the same role than the complex, inner networks of energy and information (blood and nervous system) of a biological organism.

They describe reproductive and evolving processes. For example weak forces are the equivalent to other evolving processes like the chrysalis of an insect or the resting moment of pregnancy.

Both type of forces/actions are easy to spot. Since time and space are opposite in properties and so time processes tend to be ternary (with 3 dimensions states, a first more energetic, the reproductive middle event and the final informative one), and last longer in time (the weak force has a time related constant) and hardly have any range in space, but need quiet, small, secluded places (in species this cause allopatric evolution).


– From 1 comes 2: The Universe of space-time is the ultimate simplification of a world made of multiple actions of spatial energy and temporal information, performed by an infinite tapestry of complementary systems composed of both ‘formal motions’.

– From 2 comes 4: There are 4 actions of energy and time, each one with an internal and external, negative or positive direction:  The simplex actions of energy (external motion and internal feeding). The simplex actions of time (external cyclical motion, and internal perception).  And their 2 complex combinations: exi, or external ‘actions’ and internal reproductions’ and ∑exi, the fractal, social repetition of those actions, which creates external herds that feed on energy along an external network or super-organisms structured with inner networks that deliver energy and information to all its cells.

– All systems of the Universe are defined as ‘knots’ of those 4 type of actions, which are cyclical and discontinuous, as each being switches between them, trying to survive by feeding (E), perceiving (I), reproducing (ExI0 and evolving socially ∑exi. We define the central point of those knots as a P.O.V. or fractal Non-Euclidean point, the ‘aperceptive’ engine that orders the Universe. And there are infinite of them.

– The outcome of this structure is a fractal Universe, in which knots of cyclical actions become herds and super organisms, in which the ‘informative network’ emerges again as a knot that controls the actions of the herd, packing it tightly as a new ‘cell-point’ of a new ‘fractal’ scale of the Universe.


1st Ðimotion: Non-E points-singularities of Informative perception:§ð@.2nd Ðimotion: Lineal & Angular momentum: $t. 3rd Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Bod waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏. 4th Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂. 5th Ðimotion: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T

In the graph, the development of the cycles of temporal existence, can be followed through the 3 ages or states of maximal points of its function: ∑Max.Exi. In logic terms, all species try to maximize their function of existence, ordering their life cycles in a ‘rational’ manner, through those ages and states. Actions become then strategies of survival and renewal.

There is always a Particle (Physical Jargon), Point of View (Logical Jargon), Brain (biological jargon), Non-Euclidean, Fractal point (Mathematical jargon) or ‘soul’ (mystique, existential jargon) that ‘integrates’ the incoming flows of energy and information of the system thanks to its control of a common language, used for the system to code information (geometry in physics, electronic images in biological systems, verbal thought in sociological systems, digital languages in economic systems). What is the will or goal of those points of view?: To maximize its four survival actions.

And we can formalize these combined actions with the generator equation, as each of its 4 terms means one of those actions: E=energy feeding, I=information processing, ó or X, Reproduction and ∑, social evolution.

Thus to maximize the function of existence of its system becomes the Universal mandate of any entity: Max. e x Max. I, which is achieved when E=I (mathematical rule: 5×5>9×1) and ∑->infinite.

Thus, when a system grows in balance between its energy and information and multiplies its quanta, it increases its ‘existential force’ (GST Jargon), top predator force (biological jargon) or Momentum (Physical jargon).

The mandate of existence means that all p.o.v.s will try to perceive and absorb energy till they have enough to reproduce themselves, and then, they will be ‘forced’ to evolve socially in a dense environment of self-similar cells to survive.

∑: The Bosonic point and the zero mind. Max. information and beauty, E=I

We can consider also ‘partial maxima of the function of existence.

For example, if we are to consider informative systems alone, the creation of a bosonic, zero point in which an infinite number of self-similar, ∑-forms converge is another path to maximize the function of existence.

As the bosonic point maximizes its information and informative ∑-quanta.

In the scale of informative particles all physical particles can be bosons in the proper conditions, becoming undistinguishable. The result is the formation of a single, new whole, a condensed plane of existence to which each bosonic particle gives part of its existential momentum, which emerges creating a new fractal form, combination of the topological points fusioned into the new form: The median of each S=T values for each individual field of energy and information create together a new topology that looks like a single one, as it has become either a toroid, sphere or hyperbolic new whole. So orbitals become a molecular pi-orbital that envelops the now indistinguishable ones, and our cells become part of a new whole, which emerges into a new scale, as an individual organism and so on.

The system’s integration happens in all kind of forms, from neuronal integration to cpus and gravitational fields of multiple bodies.

Perception is in fact a bosonic process: An internal zero point once formed trans/forms from its p.o.v. the forces of energy that pass through it, creating a pixelled image to perceive.

If we were to consider from a philosophical point of view that fractal mind, made of i-2 pixels that converge in stillness in the zero point, perception of ‘classic beauty’, defined by an obvious equation of harmony and balance E=I, maximizes our existence.

Herds of undistinguishable bosons are also essential in the creation of membranes. They are also essential in parallel flows of bits and bites of information and energy transiting within or between planes of existence in the toroid forms. Thus the creation of bosonic wholes from individual herds is key in the 3 type of networks that assembly together in functions of existence, E<=>I.

The will of the Universe. Sensation of beauty, pleasure, greed & love.

Each of the maximal points of the function of existence is reinforced by a positive sensation. Beauty of information; ‘greed’ for energy, and ‘sex’, which reproduces in an e=I state our forms of existence. Hence all systems reach the maximal will/pleasure/ desire at the moment of orgasm.

In other words, the Universe is an infinite game of orgasms (-: Reproduction is the game, achieved by growing in energy and information, and reproducing the system in new quanta that will evolve socially into new macro-organisms, units of the higher plane of existence.

And this brings the 4th ‘desired’ sensation – love, the desire to evolve socially with complementary beings (e=I, gender definition, where women are cyclical, max. informative beings, and male, lineal, max. Energy beings).

The conclusion is obvious: in human beings and probably in all ‘complementary fields of existence’, the program reinforces itself through 4 desired sensations: to perceive beauty, to feed on energy, to reproduce and to love socially. So the ultimate will of the Universe is spiritual, as all is motion and motion is due to the achievement of a cycle of existence, driven by a sensation.

And those sensations can be easily written as partial equations of the Generator: beauty (Max. I, i=e), happiness (Max. E, i=e), sexual pleasure (Max. ExI) and love (Max. ∑), which might be the ultimate will and sensations that resume the universal mandate.

The duality of eusocial parallel love vs. Darwinian, destructive hunting.

Of the many sub-laws derived from the mandate of existence, the duality of predator vs. loving behavior is paramount to explain multiple events of reality: All systems of the universe display a dual behavior: they prey on different systems to absorb energy and information for their bodies and minds and they evolve eusocially with members of the same species to reproduce and become bigger, more complex eusocial super organisms, sharing energy and information through common networks that create a new whole made of cellular parts.

It is the duality of the arrows of love and hate. Yet the arrow of love is a better strategy as it is the arrow of creation that the arrow of death and hate. Since the 4 actions and sensations that create the will of the Universe and evolve its 5th dimension form a Maslow pyramid of preferences: I->E->Exi->∑Exi: perception-greed-pleasure-love.

So we can describe the social evolution of the universe under the arrow of love, as a whole whose parts are all made to its image and likeness guided by the laws of all cellular systems who strive to survive by evolving eusocially to become a cellular part of that whole.

According to emergence, the mandate of existence and its fundamental sub-laws, must express itself as a fundamental law of all systems, in all the scales of the Universe.

For example, the duality expresses itself geometrically in the first scale as perpendicularity (Darwinian behavior, in which one form penetrates the other, destroying it) or communicative parallelism (which enhances the arrow of social love, as flows of information invisible to third observer, are shared at equal distances).

Two self-similar beings, which share energy and information along a small gap between them leads in fact to ‘fusion love’ – reproduction – in which parallelism occurs in two scales, the macrocosmic and cellular lower scale of existence. Reproduction across two planes of existence happens in fact in all systems:

From electrons that merge in spin/anti-spin genders till the last human being, sexuality is essential to reproduce a certain ‘function of existence’.

The why of existence, thus is the constant creation of cycles of life and wills and knots of time that want to order, committing actions that maximize its function of existence. And its highest will is love, which requires to fly further with your own will and empathize with the will of all knots of time cycles of the Universe.

While in the field of perception you want perceive, what you understand as beauty – a balance of energy and information. So goes for your actions, which are balanced, as you switch between them, perceiving forms and feeding on energies, and having sex, and loving…



‘To be or not to be that is the question‘  WS


ðº ∃xi∂st or not ðº -∃xi∂st,­ that is the ∃quætion   LS (:

‘Do not confuse motion (S) with Action (SxT).’ 

Hemingway, MEANING, action is not only ‘disordered entropic heat’ but motion with ‘form’ and MEANING≈purpose; something our demonstrator activists & entropic athletes often forget.

‘The function of ∃xist¡ence combines yin-formation and yang-entropy  to create the ³10 waves of qi: energy beings’

Lao Tse, translation of taoism to modern GST

The algorithm of creation is a very simple program by which all monad singularity that are sink of entropic/energetic/informative flows that sink into the monad will be able to perform in order to reproduce itself and radiate in an infecting manner over its world ∆+1 environment, kicking in the program of existential, survival, biological, darwinian but also social, evolving actions in which the universe performs itself as a sum of infinite individual selfish monads organised around its territories of orders its actions ‘generate’: ∑Γœ.

The dimensions of the being perceived in time are then the actions of the being as a monad performing its algorithm of survival and creation of new SuperorganiSms.

IT will consist in a serie of discontinuous actions≈exchanges of energy and information (accelerations, e-nergy feedings, information, reproduction and social evolution into Universals) of time-space caused by the monad following its program of existence, ∆i-≥ ∆a-≥∆≥∆œ, to reproduce and continue as a being in new generations. Let us consider them in more detail.

1st Action: Mind perception

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself: •≈û’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fr@ctal •point=ûniverse of space-time.

‘The languages of god are infinite’ Upanishads

“@ Monad is a Mortal Mind Mapping Mirrored into reality”5Ðefinition of a mind l§


¬E MINDS: ∆$t≥§ð@

The fundamental element of reality is the Mind-singularity, @, where space is more pure and motion more restricted, inward, as the structure of the mind – a non-euclidean point, starts to ‘attract’ irreversible flows of space-time towards its central point of maximal information, where it will then ‘explode into pure entropy’ the perceived pixels, once they have been used to slow down a time=zero point of perception for the higher entity in tao. We perceive stop-death and as such we are then able to take those pixels into memories that might be replicated in the other world…

We can express the process of perception departing from a world of ∆ hardly perceived ‘distances’ in space, $, which the force of the attractive point puts into motion becoming potentials, t, which then will start to turn and move ≥ in implosive waves, vortices of diminishing radius, Vo to=k, as they come into the larger point-singularity, § which will absorb it into its temporal vortex, ð, till it becomes perceived in the pure still mind, @ which point will die.

And the explode perpendicularly through the ‘tall axis’ as pure entropic motion scattered in space…

The being exists causally primary because it is a fractal point, •, a vortex of time that perceives by accelerating the influx of in-form-ation, forms in action its central singularity:

This vortex of time thus constantly pulls inwards towards its zero-mind singularity energy, entropy and form of microscopic ∆-i pixels, which as smaller as they can reach, will imply paradoxically a larger territory of order created by the actions of the monad:

It is then when a purely subjective fractal view of the existence of the monad through its actions of ordering perceiving feeding and reproducing, vital actions of an organism, can be assessed.

The fractal sum of dimensional actions of  3/5 D, brings the three dimensional universe.

It is the most telling explanation in detail as the dimensions of the monad will then be the sum of all its fractal actions, each one with less than a 1 dimensionality, all of them, five actions, together however forming a whole.

Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘time-action-oriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous time-space cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mind-monad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.

As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.

Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the time-space spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1-dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…

we must then continuously distinguish the simplex actions of accelerated motions, energetic feeding and informative perception, a, e, i from the complex actions that involve true travels of the being in the fifth dimension (not of the beings around itself which the feeding, informing, moving system performs), which are the offspring reproduction and Universals social evolution (œ, û, in mnemonic terms, or simply, R§, reproduction and Social Scalar evolution).

∆<i: SIMPLEX ACTIONS: æ-cceleration, ø:entropy feeding, informative communication.

Whereas the being DOES not travel/change through the fifth dimension but ab=uses smaller, ∆-1 bites of energy ∆-2 bits of information and ∆-3 quanta of motion to perform its actions.

∆±1… Complex actions, R§: Reproduction and social evolution of clone beings into wholes.

Where the being relates to equal or larger systems in its process of reproduction in identical clones and social evolution with clones into larger wholes and as such it is the being the one that enslaves and it is ab=used by the larger system or the younger, longer-lasting new generation.

The being in its constant balanced existence between larger and smaller, faster and slower, younger and older, forward and backward arrows, actions and tendencies of ∆st thus exist as the sum of those ‘fractal dimensional actions in time’, which in its sum will give ‘a tail’ f continuous past-spatial, formed, ‘whole’.

IT is then a hypothesis of work that the sums of all the fractal dimensions of time-actions equals the sum of the continuous dimensions of past-space: ∑Då=∑DS.

As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…

 Now the value of the dimensions of the actions of entropy, energy and information, reproduction and social evolution of the being vary and its calculus in mere quantitative terms is a science in itself. We are though more interested in the quality and nature of those dimensions in terms of its provoked flows of s-entropy, st-iteration and t-information
As the perceiver first attracts all those arrows of microscopic beings, converging into its focus.
But then it will select, transform and ab=use those arrows absorbed, unchaining a series of sequential events, which mostly will consist on the monad diverting some of the information coming as entropy of a flow of motion, which will direct the ‘evil monad’ (: towards a field of infantile little points of similar form, to be used as feeding energy, for the monad to reform in a burst of evil selfishness its territory to the image and likeness of its master, the monad exists as a selfish being. And as it goes through the worldcycle the monad of pretentious order will be and exi±∆st maximising its exchanges of energy and information with the outer world. This is what to be is all about:

In the graph, the arrows=actions=motions with form of existence, have all the same purpose: to help, the active element to survive, and play the game of existence of the Universe.

The action in itself is meaningful, but it is its collective ‘intelligence’ as a modular action, of a game of simple elements, which ensure the survival of the being, what matters to us.

Those actions in that sense respond to the ternary elements of reality, and are performed by each of the three parts of the Generator of the being:

So they range from the simplest pure entropic motions, ∆a (red, right side) performed by the spe-limbs/fields (Mr. Bolt), to the more complex formal, social evolution (long time absolute arrow of the fifth dimension) – signified by the UNO picture; and its in between elements:

Actions that absorb energy for the body and information for the mind which can be considered 2 present combinations, feeding on energy (max. e x i), feeding on information (Max. i x e), as all yin has a drop of yang… and finally its combined reproduction.

This simple scheme of actions is common to all beings of reality as there is no more parts to be had:

S (motion) + ∆ (Evolution) + Max. t x s (INFORMATION) + Max s x t (energy) +  s=t: reproduction.

And al what all the elements of all the potential fractal worlds of all the Universes will play this simple game, of 4+∆ åctions which form the will of the ∆º mind. 

The integral sum of those actions, then become sequentially a world cycle of existence, through three scales of super organism living.

Actions of ‘spatial entropy, temporal information and its energetic combinations and social coming togethers’ are then the fractal units from which the study of any entity of reality shall depart.

They are in temporal terms, the ∆ð-1 scale, as cells are the ∆§-1 element; and so we shall also find in complex gst clear symmetries between the beats of existence, its actions and cellular parts.

As the being acts in a modular way,it builds a social network of synchronicities, and emerges into larger wholes, which maintain the symbiosis of its order through the dynamical feed-backbondage it establishes with all other beings, in the building of non-Euclidean networks through the five postulates which reflect formally the nature of those communicative and social networks, that create first waves and then topological planes:

In the graph, the mind of the fifth non-e postulate feeds on entropic and informative flows that transverse it as the elliptic focus of a non-euclidean geometry in which it is the polar sink But the mind is not a leibnizian monad, but communicates through its axis of expression, which tend to be bidimensional holes in its π-3 membrane, to be able to form networks, and so the events of the Universe become more complex as the communication between membranes (second postulate) becomes regulated by a logic postulate, the third postulate of relative similarity and complementarity, such as systems whose topology is complementary form bondages, so do identical systems in social bondages, but systems who have different codes of information tend to use each other as entropy and energy feeding and submitting each other to darwinian behaviour.

The ethic postulate is thus essential to the organic, sentient, perceptive causal sequential structure of the Universe, and forms with the fifth postulate – definition of the mind – the basis for a causal, why-geometry of existence, able to explain all its events and actions as born of the ethic postulate of relative perception of equality – a perception defined by the topological structure of the monad accruing to its ternary forms, hyperbolic, elliptic or planar shape.

The postulates of non-e are thus also logic and i-logic in the sense that they show in the third (similarity) and fifth (monad), a logic sentient nature that implies communication of languages perceive in themselves  languages/forms-in-action have sensations attached to them as to be able to process information in a meaningful sensorial way. But the linguistic sentient nature of the Universe is a philosophical question.

The praxis that matters is the fact that all systems can be CONSIDERED IN ALL ITS EVENTS CAUSED BY A MONAD. All events will then be originated ultimately in the action of a more often wholeness/larger monad, in which the being will be performed within a network a submissive action. We can then always start our analysis seeking the cause of the action, event or being we observe, which would have been born in a seed that started with a reproductive action – the beginning of its worldcycle, soon to be≈come a series of actions in itself.

As the actions of the being build those super organisms then the subconscious intelligence of time magically will shape a ‘derive’ towards more information, which is the consequence of the discontinuous sum of those actions, which are mostly tending, as focused by the monad in the increase of information.

If systems WERE ABLE in that sense to let the monad kill/die/clean its form and rejuvenate by performing perhaps in all its scales more entropic actions of self-destruction it could be possible to make the monad immortal.

Immortality though is the inverse unnatural arrow of the monad’s existence in its constant ‘stiff-ness’ of existence as it converts lineal motions of space into time-information of growing frequency: S>ti>ƒƒ…

This arrow of informative stillness that is the ultimate reason why systems become stiff forms, and finally die in a third age in which time stops totally in the zero-point of the monad, and the whole system freezes (as the monad has somehow obturate its capacity to entropically die and rejuvenate in small doses, in a fully reversible process).

So entropy sets in after the long time of informative stillness, when time dilates as stillness sets in. Now suddenly time disentangle in an explosive impressive impetu-acceleration on the point of death, and explodes literally in an erasing frenzy, which is the death point, in which a tremendous discontinuous jump from zero motion to infinite speed happens in the most discontinuous of all jumps of reality when O (monad) x ∞ (universe)  reverses for an instant into ∞ (monad dying exploding dissolving into the Universe) x O (monad’s information completely erased).

Indeed, from the zero to the vertical motion into infinity the monad can only in this trick of topology – the axis of infinity – be both zero in the motion of lateral thought, infinite in the motions rising up and down in the scales of time of the fifth dimension.

As such the monad can keep its zero state while moving at infinite co-existing instantaneous speed between the magic co-existing scales as they are for the monad time-webbed in different past and futures which the monad co-perceives in present time.

The monad as instantaneous traveller in time due to the boring of the fifth dimension through its invagination of network systems, that communicate its parts with the different regions of time-space, introduces questions, which are difficult to grasp for the human mind, as instantaneous speed, co-existence of past to future tails of time (the different scales the monads transit) and travels to the local past. So we shall leave it here at this introductory level.

In the graph the black hole monad with its axis of infinity where time goes to zero to accelerate suddenly in a jet of blue z>c dark entropy that connects the galaxy with other ‘gala cells’ of the Universe. The different perception in time and inverse perpendicular space of the regions of a super organism explains in differing time ages its functions and forms.

The function and arrows of existence: Æ,œ,ï,ø,û.

To be in the larger picture is to be part of a super organism in which the ∆-1 being (i-1)  performs smaller tasks; to be an individual which performs the 6 motions of a world cycle of existence as it goes through its world cycle, and to be the ‘God’, ∆+1 whole of a smaller myridad of beings that make up the system. This 3rd function however is modulated by the ‘subconscious ego’ of the system, its inner networks, and so does not affect to what we call generically existence, ‘self-centred’ in the being and its ∆+1 whole.

If we define the being by its highest informative language-head or particle ab. i, all i-beings of a given i-scale of the 5th dimension will become a fractal point around which a territory and a series of social flows of communication will establish a wave of existence, Max. ExI (s-t), the function of existence thus will be displayed by the fractal point, which will enact symmetries across the scales of the 5th dimension, seeking more energy for its body moves and reproductions, more information for its mind games of perception and love.

What is the purpose of the fractal game? To preserve by repetition of present balanced space-time actions, the super organism in an immortal state. To exist the being absorbs and emits energy and information, ±∆E x I.

In the graph actions of energy’s and information’s absorption and emission (-∆æ: acceleration, +∆e: feeding, -∆i: communication +∆i: perception) move the being through its ages as it absorbs more energy than information.

In the graph, the program of the Universe is simple, made of survival åctions performed by each Œ-point, with the help of its ‘ternary, organic parts’, as all systems, make 2 type of Simplex Actions of absorption and emission of energy and information with their limbs/fields and heads/particles and Complex Åctions of reproduction and social evolution with their bodies/waves, TO ENSURE THEIR SURVIVAL in a fractal, bio-logical Universe:

Simplex, æ, ï Actions:


±∆Æ: Feed on spatial energy to perform future spatial motions and grow their territorial Vital Space (±∆æ: – a: locomotion, which emits energy, +e: absorbtion of energy or feeding). We introduce with those actions the Logic Concept of ‘Energy’, as Potential Energy (Stored, fed Energy: +∆E) and Kinetic Energy (Accelerated motions that change the trajectory of the being,   -∆E). Those will be the only verbal concepts of Energy in T.Œ, while we shall respect the Physical concept for other equations)

– Tƒ-actions: ±∆ï: Emit≈ Communicate or absorb Information=perceive with their particles-heads (±∆ ï: +∆i: perception, -∆i: communication by emission of information )

We call this actions, ‘simplex actions’, as they involve merely the absorbtion or emission of the simplest substances of reality, spatial, lineal motions and cyclical information.

And use to define them the ‘verbal concepts’ of energy and information, less precise than its mathematical formulae (as energy is a precise mathematical concept which includes both, potential energy, related to form, position, information and kinetic energy related to lineal motion, but in the common language energy is used more as synonymous of capacity to push and asmove, of kinetic energy).

Simplex actions are connected to the world cycle of beings and its symmetry in space, Sp (energy action)Tƒ (informative action), by the fact they are performed through the 3 connected parts of any system, and chained causally, as a system needs to ‘absorb information’ (∆i) in order to perceive the energy they want to feed on (+∆ø), and will move towards that energy (-∆a), and communicate often with other beings of its herd to hunt that energy (∆ï).

On the other hand, when the system has achieved this primary actions (±Ei), in the short term, which are needed to refill the energy and information of its minds, bodies and limbs (particles, waves and fields in physical systems); it tries on the long term to realize two complex actions of survival, reproduction, which ensures survival after death and social evolution, which makes the parts stronger:

– So we talk of two complex åctions, when there is stored enough energy and information available to perform them: the Œ-point will reproduce its System in a small offspring of similar beings, (Œ ∑œ-1) in other region of space-time, and then those clones and similar beings will evolve together to become a larger whole of the 5th dimension: ∑œ-1>Œ.

Reproduction and social evolution are thus two complex actions intimately connected. And the result of those 5 actions, we shall call the ‘a, e, ï, œ, û’ of existence is a simple program of survival which all systems follow.

The symbols we shall use for those actions are vowels, and they are self-evident (we prefer them to the strict Spe, Tƒ, ST ternary elements and ages of space-time, to make them easily comprehensible). So a is ‘acceleration’, e is energy feeding, i is perception of information, ï is communication between two points, œ is an offspring of similar œ-points and û is the creation of a a Universal whole in an upper ˆplane of the 5th dimension.

We shall also use the å symbol for an existential action, as it is performed always by a o-point, and as in the case of the ‘added’ terms on our vowels, distinguish the concept easily from other uses of normal languages.

The wider game.

Our game of existence is limited to perform a few actions for our bodies and minds – as we feed, we perceive, we reproduce and we socialize with other humans or construct mechanisms that manipulate energy and information. And this type of actions we do, limited by the fact that we are systems as everything else in the Universe made of energy and information, is what we call the game of existence, the will for which we live and breathe and feel and want to ‘be’.

We exist by performing certain actions between birth and extinction in a society, actions remarkably identical to each other, to the point they can all be qualified in a few groups that we might call ‘dimensions of existence’. Departing from this fact we can trace for each particle of the Universe a simple physiological, structural program determined by its dimensions of existence, or type of actions it performs. This are the basis of a General Unification Theory of all sciences, called Systems sciences, in which we define a first ‘Generator’ equation of those ‘dimensions’ or actions of existence we all perform.

What are those dimensions? Simple. We are all systems of energy and information, either particles of information/fields of energy (physical species) or heads that process information and are moved by a body of energy (biological beings). Thus all systems absorb, emit and transfer and merge energy and information of an specific type they can decode and use to reconstruct their form, their own information. And so we establish 4 basic dimensions that all systems follow:

– Gauging information

– Feeding on energy to move and

– Reproduce its own information

– Forming networks with other self-similar beings with whom exchange of energy and information takes place.

Informing, feeding, reproducing and forming networks that become then units of a higher scale of the fractal game of the Universe, departing from a General Generator Equation and a series of rules, laws and simple causal processes creates a game of rather deterministic nature that can be even run as an algorithm of ‘life’ and ‘existence’ and will reproduce most of the events and forms of any physical or biological Universe.

This web uses mostly common or biological jargons, more anthropomorphic and less inclusive proper of XX century science, in the description of social sciences, of humans transferring information to machines, creating social networks called gods and civilizations, exchanging.

But there is a higher jargon, one which is more inclusive and hence deals with the terms of space and time instead of energy )space) and information *time cycles with a frequency.

This is the jargon of general systems sciences of which i consider myself the leading scientist on the blue planet but not perhaps further than alpha centauri (-;

How do we apply those dimensions to our analysis of sociological life? Easy.

Consider what you are in more detail: your desire for energy is expressed in your body and blood/digestive/motion-muscle systems, those 3 sub-physiological systems are ‘living systems’ that desire and show a will to hunt for that energy.

You are also made of 3 endocrine systems that reproduce different hormones and nervous thought impulses that process information and so on. We can in fact decompose you as a system which is made like a knot of flows of energy and information – those physiological systems – constantly processing.

So the sum of all those ‘dimensional wills’ of all the similar individuals of the homo species, results in an economy and the goods of the welfare state we want.

And this is the application of a biological analysis of economics: a perfect society is one that satisfies with maximal production those needs, for right energy and information, family/reproductive values and social peace and communication (free social time).

Its measure is already applied by the UNO which also calls ‘dimensions’ those types of goods, since obviously each species knows what he needs to take care of its dimensional actions to survive – feeding and informing and reproducing and evolving socially in peace, the UNO has ‘figured it out’ without the need of having a ‘theory’ behind.

So the IHD, the index of Human Development of societies shows the ‘WHealth’, the healthy wealth of a society that fulfills those dimensions and gives to its citizens food, shelter, health, information and social peace, is a good example of 3 dimensions of social and life existence that are maximized by an economical index of welfare, and represent the type of actions that we need to do to satisfy our welfare.

We use it extensively here.

In a wider view, all what we do can be resumed as e xi actions, which coincidentally can be written as a mirror of its verbal meaning: e x i = st, we mix energy and information performing a time-space cycle in which we obtain or not energy, information reproduction social actions with others.

All what you do is tending to feed your body your mind, reproduce/love and come together with others.

So we are in that wider jargon ‘knots of space-time cycles’. A space-time cycle is any trajectory of any entity of the Universe in search of one of its 4 dimensions of existence, energy, information, reproduction and social evolution.

Those 4 ‘quantum numbers’ (in the case of particles of physics) or ‘drives of life’ (in the case of biological beings), or ‘social actions’ (in the case of human beings), or ‘types of machines’ (in the case of the economic ecosystem) and so on, are the underlying, logic, biologic, survival, systemic, social program that runs the universe with a precision of mathematical origin and a vitality of biological, and perceptive nature.

And this is what we describe in this section of the web, the program of the Universe…

Γunction of existence: Max. ∑EXI=ST


All what we have said can be simplified ad maximal with an equation of survival, Max. e x i ±s=tº, that is a logic equation that establishes a mandate of actions of energy and information, entropic space and temporal clocks:

to maximize the spatial entropy, energy and information and temporal clocks of the being and its balanced combinations in body, limbs and heads/particles.

So if we define the energy of the being and its information, forms in action (momentum steps) as the present value obtained by superposition of the spatial entropy and temporal information of the being:

exi = (S±t), we obtain normally an integral or derivative function between two scales of the fifth dimension from where some basic mathematical laws of ¬Æ can be established.

We write this conceptual equation in many forms, as it is ultimately another mirror image of the generator, and its three parts. I like the acronym (if you haven’t noticed GST accepts all languages as symmetric mirrors of reality, and specially enhances the concepts of verbal thought – the way humans ‘understand’).

So e x i, entropy x information, or energy x information (energy being entropy with some form), represents the body-wave, dominant present systems of any super organism, which is maximised when e=i (s=t, if we use the alternative concepts of space and time).

To maximize exi at the balance point (s=t), of maximal communication between body and brain is the fundamental strategy of survival of a system (as the product a x b is maximal, for any a+b = C in the point where a=b).

Systems thus try to maintain itself in the point of balance, and serve its body-wave to iterate the system and reproduce and make the present immortal the momentum-energy of the system conserved…

But how a system achieves that goal? Obviously absorbing an emitting, the three elements of the system through actions that exchange entropy, energy and information with the outer world.

So we also talk of an action of ‘entropy and information’, of ‘space and time’ of ‘energy’, as the fundamental event of existence of all beings; something which in physics is quite established since Planck found quantum beings are made of h-actions, a ratio of spatial entropy-motion and time-information: e=hv…

(The reader should excuse the ambivalence of the language of scientists, which is carried often in this blog to avoid constant explanations; as entropy and energy are constantly confused so are form and information… entropy is pure motion with no form, form is pure information with no motion, energy is entropy with little form: Max. e x min. ƒ, and information is form-in-action, form in motion, Max. ƒ x Min. e; so in equations such as e=mc², actually e is entropy not energy as it destroys the mass-form – a vortex of information into an explosion that erases it.)

To exist imply to make combinations of arrows of time, which I call ‘tensors’ of existence as they come from the function, and its ternary symmetries.

And the question of how many events are allowed To exi=st is the first question of algebra of existence, which we formalise with a mix of conceptual logic verbal thought and classic equations as we go along translating the meaning of the common function of mathematics, the language that better reflects the structure and events of space-time beings.

Actions are thus evident once we realise we just start algebra with simple combinatorics, of  3±∆ elements, often associated to a few mathematical numbers notably 4 constants, π, the constant of cycles, phi & e the constant of inner and outer growth & 10, the social constant; along the number for the whole 1 and for the infinitesimal, 0 and the bidimensional number of a motion in time from entropy to information, i.

∫ e x i SURVIVAL ACTIONS ≈ ∑Æ,œ,ï,ø,û

Stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’.

But what makes something to exist as opposed to not? What are the rules of creation of beans and conservation of them? What is the program of survival of species once created, to endure in the Universe?

THIS THE HUGE VITAL PART OF THE UNIVERSE – THE FACT THAT THE ABSTRACT LAWS OF BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH IN TIME AND SPACE can be reduced to a series of survival actions, performed from a point of maximal information or dimensional mind of the system. We can talk of a Universe of vital organic systems, made of dust of space-time, seen inwards also as complex systems, fluctuating, traveling through scales of existence but seemingly all performing the same game, the function of survival, ∃, which determines all what is stience, that is all functions in which there is at least one form in existence, normally described by the generator and its ternary symmetries:

∃ sπecies ≈ Γst¡

becomes then the existential function of any form or being, which will follow the generator ternary topologies of the formalism of GST. All is within the formal description of an ‘inflationary language’, which in fact we shall reduce further by  experience into what it is real.

So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.

Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.

HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.

This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.

The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.

The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.


So departing from this law, the function of existence

Γ. ∃xi≈sT

AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.

The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.

The universal ‘algorithm’ of existence is a rather simple function: Max. ∑ e x i ds dt, which encodes the point of balance and immortality of any system of the Universe. Its study is the essential element of Ælgebra (existential algebra), the i-logic, mathematical model that develops the rules for that function to be defined in the domain of any space-time being. Certain domains will not host the function and do not exist. There are many jargons to express this truth.

I found the simplest and more telling to be the one of the title: e x i | s≈t, whereas the 3 parts of the system, its ∆-1 spatial background, its e xi body-wave ∆- system of energy and information and its temporal, ∆+1 mind system in balance with the field from where it extracts its energy and information; become a ‘whole function of exi=stience in time and space, ‘extracting from space’ the entropy motion and from time, the i-logic form required to imprint the body-wave of present

To exist in present, the body-wave thus needs to be in a relative balance with its world ecosystem and have a ‘mind imprinting’, a will to survive and perform its actions over that field… As it does so, through small steps trying to maximise its energy and information, Max. ∑ e x i, with the restriction imposed by any product function (e≈s, i≈t, Max. e x i| s=t), the function of existence will develop into an integral world cycle, where the maximal function will be ‘cheated’ in 3 points, as it turns the wheel of existence, the wheel of the world cycle: Max. e (youth) e=i (adult hood) and max. i (3rd age), before it dies into a zero sum.

The frequencies and scales of time speed of the Universe

A definition in brief of the 5th dimension illustrated in the next graph will be:

‘The 5th dimension is the dimension of spatial size (abb. Se) and speed of temporal clocks (Abb.Tƒ). Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and bigger ones tick slower, as it happens in galaxies, human beings or DNA.’

In most systems, the product of the information and size of the system does not vary. And this dual invariance or co-invariance, Se x Tƒ =K is what defines the geometry and laws of the 5th dimension. In this simple form is equivalent to Einstein’s metric of the 4th dimension, the famous S – (ct)2 equation:

In the graph we illustrate that co-invariance which is the origin of the ISOMORPHISMS of all the scales of reality. And so now we must define the 2 elements of the 5th dimension – the multiple clocks of time and scales of space that co-exist in every part of reality.

The  image, taken from a film called ‘powers of ten’ by Eames, show this astounding fact: the speed of time-clocks, Tƒ, which are anything that ticks and turns, multiplied by the size of the space they occupy, Se, is constant, Se x Tƒ =K. And this fact allows the camera to travel through the 5th dimension by shrinking or enlarging your size, with the result that if you see the film you will NOT distinguish your travel outwards, growing in size in the 5th dimension from a normal travel in the 4th dimension, WITHOUT changing scale of size or speed of clocks (we have added in our pictures the change in time speed, Tƒ, which Eames did not know).

Now let us start with a classic definition of all what we have said about ‘DIMENSIONS’ based in their study from a still point of view of the structure of space-time.

It is the definition of a ‘geometry’ by one of the foremost mathematicians of the turn of the XX century, Mr. Klein, who in his famous ‘Erlangen Program’ defined many of the future advances of mathematics.

He said that…

‘A Geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’.

Klein said the same we said, using the term ‘invariant’ instead of still point of view, and space, instead of the modern concept of space-time as the ultimate ‘dual’ substances of a dimension.

So the next paradigm studies the invariant properties of the 5th dimension. And now we can define the 5th dimension geometry using that definition, by asking ourselves, what truly does not change when we move from scales of size in the Universe, from the infinitely small to the infinitely large?

Obviously we change our size in space, from galaxies to atoms. So nothing seems to remain invariant, and that would eliminate our pretension of studying a 5th dimension of spacetime…

But wait a minute we have said ‘spacetime’, not only space. So even though size changes in space, perhaps there is also a change in clocks of time that ‘balances’ the change in size on space, so the product of both, the change of size in space and the change in the speed of time-clocks balance each other? 

As it happens this is the case and this known property of time clocks that turn much faster when they shrink in spatial size, so atoms move billions of time faster than galaxies is the fundamental ‘still point of view’ observed when we travel through the 5th dimension.

Now in science when something doesn’t change, and that something is composed of two terms, we call it a co-invariance. So we are talking of the geometry of the 5th dimension as the study of the co-invariance of time clocks & space scales.

Then we shall define the ‘first, principal co-invariance of the 5th dimension’ Se x Tƒ = K

Latter we will find out then that there are many other co-invariant combinations of energy-motion and in/form/ation-time that do not change in the Universe as we travel through scales of size, things so fundamental to our existence and nature, as our life-death cycles, or our åctions, or our organic forms.

Each ‘family of species’ and each relative ‘scale of the Universe’ has a different Se x Tƒ = K equation, giving birth to the astounding variety of Universal species. Such equation however becomes in a Universe in which we are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the most important equation of each species. And within that species remains mostly invariant. The same happens between all the derived species of that relative membrane of space-time.

The use of infinite clocks to measure time rhythms in the Universe is a theory of multiple spaces-times, whose parameters of Temporal Information and Spatial energy, surprisingly enough follow a simple mathematical law, Se x Tƒ = K, from where the order and structure of all the parts of the Universe can be deduced.

In the graph, different scales of the 5th dimension; the ‘real’ infinite quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information of the Universe, and 3 complementary systems, Se x Tƒ, made of ‘energetic bodies/fields’ and informative ‘particles/heads’ from physical sciences (a light field-photon particle), from biological sciences (a human body-eye system) and from economic sciences (a weapon-camera system).

Since the Universe is a fractal of infinite complementary systems, made of energy and information, whose ‘common’ properties are the field of study of the 5th dimension.

Tƒ facilitate the transition from absolute 4D single space-time continuum to relational, fractal multiple 5D space-time, we shall consider in some post the relationship between 4D Einstein’s metric and 5D Metric.

Since the classic model of physics and its 4th dimension is merely one of those ‘planes of space-time’, the one humans perceive as information and energy, made of light space-time. This plane was described by Einstein’s special relativity and Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations. And their equations can be reduced easily to the general equation of the metric of space-time, where the space-time constant is obviously the speed of light, as light waves is the ‘substance’ that makes up our galactic space-time, filled with light, even when we eliminate all objects (light background radiation).

So either in Einstein’s metric or Maxwell equations, when we interpret properly the meaning of its parameters of ‘external space and time’ and translate them into parameters of ‘internal space-time’, we obtain a similar equation:

√µ xe = c, whereas the electric and magnetic constants represent the relative ‘temporal clock-like vortex’ (electric charges) and relative, spatial, lineal motions (bipolar magnetic currents, which do NOT have monopoles, that is vortex, but always flow between two points, the north and south pole) whose products remains co-invariant, constant.

So we can consider Maxwell’s equation for the description of the 4Dimension ‘membrane’ of light space-time, a variety of the 5D metric: S(µ) x T(e) = ST±3: C

Whereas ST±3 is the constant space-time of light in which we are immersed.

The profound implications of that translation of 4D into 5D for XXI c. physics, and the enlightenment of many unresolved questions about the structure of the Universe will occupy many pages of our posts dedicated to astrophysics, universal constants, and the ST0±3 galactic/light space-time.

And we shall explain in the analysis of the bidimensional 2-manifolds made with a space and a time dimension that build, layer upon layer, in holographic fashion the 4D Universe, also how the new metric explain better relativity, its Riemannian Geometry and the spooky effects of time dilation, mass increase, length contraction and c-speed.

The flows of energy and information between scales are asymmetric.

So we write, Spe (we use here the term for spatial-speed-size only as ‘energy’ Sp is a combined parameter that does not apply here), x Tƒ (we prefer to use temporal information, to Tƒ, temporal cycles, as the key parameter of the 5th dimension is the quantity of information a smaller being, a genetic system, a quantum atom carries), equals a constant, co-invariant quantity, ST±4, where the ∆±4 index is a parameter that allow us to classify systems from the smallish atomic particles (which paradoxically have more information) to the larger ones, which have paradoxically less information hence a smaller index:

5th dimension bestcylesofexistence_image002

In the graph, two different flows of energy and information, define:

  • The thermodynamic arrow: energy-motion flows emerge perfectly in smaller world-planes downwards, but they do not emerge perfectly upwards, without loss. So when energy flows upwards, there is heat loss, waste of food and a diminishing quantity of upper systems, which feed from lower ones (trophic pyramids). Yet energy does flow perfectly downwards, so when a larger being moves, all its smaller systems do move in perfect synchrony without apparent effort with it. And this duality determines strongly the way systems ‘act’ to absorb energy in the Universe. And how they position themselves in ‘equipotential’  bidimensional fields of larger system to move without apparent effort on them (from planets in gravitational orbitals to cells along layers on morphological structures).
  • On the other hand, information does flow perfectly upwards but it does not downwards. And this duality explains the evolutionary laws and arrow of information: Indeed, there is no perfect Lamarckian evolution; that is, traits acquired in the larger scale do not imprint easily cells and genes, but there is perfect genetic evolution: information stored in DNA do determine the characters of larger planes.
  • Finally information and energy can flow perfectly in the same plane, which determines the principles of cyclical inertia (Tƒ conservation of angular momentum) and lineal inertia (conservation of lineal momentum) and the laws of reproduction of energy and information in ‘mixed’ waves and bodies that radiate both across extended space-times (light radiation and biological radiations).

Thus the laws of thermodynamics (energy arrows) and evolution (information arrows) and reproduction (repetition of both across a single space-time) are also derived of the metric of the 5th dimension. They are perhaps the most important laws to understand the dynamics in time and space of the Universe.

We shall call those 2 different logarithmic scale, which added for any species gives us the same 10 value, the Tƒ (time-information scale, graphed above) or evolutionary arrow; and the U (size) scale or thermodynamic scale graphed below.

Those two scales, which are logarithmic scales in base 10¹º, the commonest number to emerge from the individual to the Universal (∆+1 plane); that is the number of stars in a galaxy, of atomic DNA ties in a molecule, of humans soon in the global planet, of cells in organisms… mean that to transcend from U to U+1 (a larger whole), we need that number, but we will become a ‘whole’ unit, hence loose the quantized information as perceived in the new scale, as a single being.

And vice versa: if we become quantized down, and perceived as a sum of quanta, we will gain that logarithmic quantity of information. And this introduces an essential element of ∆ST – the understanding of the quantic or continuous perception of systems, such as ∑e∆-1=U (the sum of quanta seen with maximal information in motion, becomes a whole continuous perception, so the sum of quantum energies becomes the relativity continuous description of still space) and ∑Tƒ=Tƒ, the sum of cycles of time becomes a still form of information.

And we will return to that paradoxical duality, which is the key to understand space and time and its motions and stillness, as well as perception, minds and languages.

Thus an essential consequence of the difference of quantity of energy and information between the larger, continuous energetic planes and smaller, quantized, informative planes of the Universe, is the non-commutative nature of the arrows of energy (transfer of motion between planes and entities) and information (transfer of form between planes and entities):

Planes of space that structure cellular/atomic, individual/organic and social/cosmic scales which synchronize its cycles in inverse fashion to its size.

So the informative, genetic, smaller faster plane codes the larger planes, which transfer back energy to the lower planes (thermodynamic laws: energy can be transferred fully downwards to the molecular space in the form of heat, but heat cannot be transferred fully upwards as energy, and the inverse law of information: smaller systems can code fully with their information upper layers as in genetics, but upper layers cannot transfer its form downwards fully – there is no Lamarckian evolution).

This structure thus gives birth to the specific åctions of a being, which are transfers of energy and information among scales limited by the laws of evolution and thermodynamics.

It essentially means that energy will flow downwards, and so bigger systems will control lower systems by controlling their energy – cells will depend on the digestive systems to feed. While smaller systems will control upper systems by forming them: cells will code genetically upper systems.

The same happens in physical systems where atoms and molecules code the forms of upper systems, from crystals to geological cycles, but they are trapped by the larger gravitational and electromagnetic fields created by the cosmic bodies.

Thus evolutionary and thermodynamic laws/arrows (we shall call the U scale of size the thermodynamic scale and the Tƒ inverse scale of informative growth, the evolutionary scale), and its exchanges of information and energy are a consequence of the metric of the 5th dimension, which makes smaller systems to process more information than larger ones, even though the product of both remain co-invariant: Se x Tƒ =ST.

This could be stated in the following manner, when considering exchanges of energy and information across multiple scales:

‘The total energy obtained from upper planes by an individual system is roughly equivalent to the information it obtains from lower planes, and both are mixed in the world-plane by its bodies and waves to reproduce the system: ∑Tƒ(i-∆)<≈>Se(∆+∆)’.

5th Isomorphism: 5 fractal Åctions: ∆(æ-4; ï-3; e-2; œ-1; û+1)

‘Do not confuse motion with Action.’ Ernest Hemingway

As we define the main åctions in a general analysis on the 1st line, in this post we shall study in more detail the different åctions of space-time that explain the program of the universe, in a sequential pattern, after a brief introduction defining them, from the åctions of light, throughout the physical scales, into the biological and Universal scales.

Now, the study of the ‘Program of Existence’ is an enormously extended field, and so we must consider for the reader not to loose its ‘mind’ (-; on such vast field, which encompasses all the åctions and events of the Universe, only a few generic elements in ∆ST, which are latter studied in detail for each species, as in the aforementioned cases of the 4 quantum numbers. 4 genetic letters, 4 biological drives and 4 Maxwell equations.

Thus, immediately the reader would realize that according to the duality between ‘the thoughts of God’ (∆ST) and its details (all the different sciences) 2 are the main sub-disciplines of this field of knowledge are:

– The study of the 4 drives of existence for each species of the Universe. This should be realized in each science, as an introductory course that embeds the science in ∆ST

– The study of the interåctions, synchronicities, order and relationship between the 4 drives and its generic laws for all systems. This second field is the purpose of this post.

Thus for all said, it is quite evident that along the study of the topologies in space and ages in time, the study of the åctions is the 3rd most important isomorphism of the universe.

The difference between motions and åctions.

Now it is important to understand the difference between motions and åctions.

Motions as studied by physicists are not composed of questions about the reason of the motion. The why of the motion is not important but the form of the motion. This is thus motion in its most abstract nature, but motions are not automatic. beings move for reasons which re embedded in the laws of physics. That is the law of minimal time implies that the Universe is efficient and tries to perform motions in minimal time that have a purpose. The motions’ purpose defines the type of action we study and we can reduce all the reasons of why causalities of motions to 5 type of motions, themselves natural to the 3 arrows of time, and the 2 substances or forms of motion, and the 1 quality of motion to be finite. From this we obtain the following chain.

Motions are of two types, |, lineal planar motions which decelerate as they expand in a single sheet of space, and O-vortices of time, with accelerated gradients towards the particle of the field, charge, mass, or any accelerating time clock.

Because vortices follow a generic Vo x Ro = K vortex Law in ∆-dimensions, (the previous is equation for 2-manifold vortices-clocks), we can define two clear tendencies towards ‘static planes’, or spatial entropic decelerating motion which t certain moment will reach a relative infinite space at relative zero motion as pure space, and the inverse accelerated gradient vortices, masses, charges and any other vortex, which accelerates towards an infinite relative event horizon, which is the ‘beginning ‘f a bridge or pure motion in the 5th dimension towards an emergence or dissolution in a ∆±1,2 planes of existence.

Motions are finite stop and go beats of existence. There are 2 type of geometric motions accelerated clocks of time and expansive, decelerating, entropic planes of space, the constant beat between the two extremes of acceleration in clocks of time and decelerating expansive spaces are the relative finite crossing Rosen bridges between scales of motions

Thus two ascend an scale of existence you must turn fast, spin very fast, very fast and as you spin faster, and grow in mass you transform yourself since 5th dimensions ravels implies internal vital space-time transformations, into something else of the higher dimension – normally after dying exploding leaving your energy to the sucker limbic, system of the monster of the higher dimension that preys on your energy, but that is not a motivation of importance to physicists. It just happen that for emergence in a higher dimension you must die in the inferior dimension from where you  were coming.

Let us then start with 3 definitions of time of increasing complexity that resume this T.Œ’s fundamental elements:

‘God is the seer of Times, with a logic higher than man.’ Augustine, on Time, whose 3 i-logic motions, create reality.

‘The arrow of Times that can be seen is present Space, a Maya of the senses. It is not the eternal game of existences, the arrows of past, yang-energy and future, yin-formation, which combine to reproduce the ∞ beings.’

Lao, on the Function of Existence, an its fractal generator: Sp<=>Tƒ. Free translation.

‘Time is motion and motion never ends. Since time is what the Universe conserves. From this simple principle all other laws of Nature and all details derive. 3 type of motions or arrows of time are defined:

  • Entropic, expansive motions that erase information or relative past motions.
  • Repetitive, present, spatial motions that conserve the information of beings.
  • And informative, evolutionary motions that increase its information or life arrows.

Those 3 motions are seen in the stillness of space as 3 forms: lineal forms, the shortest distance in space; cyclical forms, the geometry that stores more information in time, and vibratory, wave-like forms, that reproduce present states.

It is the interaction of those 3 motions and functions of time, and its symmetry with its 3 forms and organs in space, which construct through symmetries and integrations, all the systems of the Universe, and explain its events in time’

The meaning of it all in a nutshell.

But why such a T.Πshould exist?

Because, as Einstein put it, ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. Its complexity thus arises from the iteration and combination of 3 simple elements, resumed in a sentence ‘fractal space times beings’. We affirm that all beings are made of a vital space (we do not occupy space, we ‘are’ the space we occupy), regulated by cyclical clocks of time (we do not last a life-death cycle, we are made of clocks of time, with a finite duration), which spread across a series of ‘scalar’ planes of space-time, organized from smaller parts (atoms, molecules, cells and so on), which form wholes (organisms, states of matter) parts of bigger social entities (societies, world, planets, stars, galaxies)…

And so because the ‘organization’ of systems from smaller to larger parts is ‘organic’, we talk of a 5th dimension of ‘scales’ of space-time, which ‘co-exist’ in each physical, social or biological system of Nature.

And by extracting the properties of ‘space’, ‘time’ and the ‘organic scales’ of all systems, through the ‘metric of the 5th dimension’, we shall be able to establish a series of ‘isomorphic’ laws proper of all entities which are the essence of this TŒ and describe a pantheist Universe of space-time beings, composed of spherical centers that store its logic, memorial clock cycles (particle/head), which commands a lineal system of motion (limbs, fields), and reproduce, iterate the system, with its intermediate hyperbolic body/wave, through exchanges energy and information with the outer world, to maximize the survival and existence of those particles/fields and heads/limbs.

Time moment after time moment our vital space changes internally, biologically accumulating form, information towards a 3rd age, and externally as we move performing ‘åctions of space-time’. But why things move?

The fact that space is a formal slice of time is truth both in mathematical physics (where derivatives of time are used to calculate space, either in Galilean’s relativity or in the 4 vectors of Einstein) and logically. In that regard, if we talk of 3 ‘arrows’-‘motions’ of time, entropy-disorder from future to past, <, present, still form or repetitive form that seems not to change, ≈, and future, informative flow, then we can write, with those 3 symbols of ‘Existential Algebra’:

T: <≈>: Time=Change=Motion from past to future

S: ≈: Space=Still = Present.

It is though in the asymptotic transition between a time state of pure motion, accelerated inward in the time vortex and the space state of expansive lineal decelerating motion, where the ‘true life of the universe’ its mixed functions of existence, Œ, which beat between its space and time states: Φ: S>T<S>T. takes place

That is, space is only a minimal derivative of time, and for that reason we see it ‘still’ but reality is a flow of infinite different ‘small arrows’ of time, as all beings develop its space-time cycles and åctions of existence. So as Leibniz explained, absolute space is just the simultaneous perception of all those flows of time, stopped and pegged to each other, and absolute time, the sequential pegging of all time cycles and life-death existences – but we must consider each entity with its own cycles of finite duration and its own vital spaces, encircled by those cycles as the true structure that iterates itself and causes the events and forms of reality.

So we need 3 elements for a T.œ, based in time ‘existences’ to describe reality, (where Œ will be called the function of existences, composed of time cycles, O, and 3 dimensions of space, ‘joined’ by the time cycle): an analysis of vital spaces and time cycles, which put together create the physical and biological and social systems of the Universe, and a metric ‘dimension’ to order them – the 5th dimension of space-time:

Further on, the previous graph shows that for parts to become wholes, they must exist first.

So we must add to the ‘3 arrows of time-motion’, entropic energy, or past, present repetition or space, future information, a 4th relative time arrow, of SOCIAL EVOLUTION, from parts into wholes, which includes all other arrows, and expands our concept of the world cycle of life and death, as all systems are born in a seminal ∆-1 scale of that relative future arrow of Cosmic, social evolution from particles into galaxies, from genes into organisms; and then evolve socially through 3 ages that maximize the 3 relative arrows of time, the young, energy age, the repetitive, present spatial age of maximal iteration and the 3rd age of information and social power, back to the lower scale of ∆-1 seminal cells or big-bang radiation (once the system has gone through its 3 states of gaseous energy, liquid balance and informative crystal solid age), into death described by Sp=Mc².

There are infinite external and internal space-time cycles, one for ‘each ‘clock of time, from the smallest charge to the biggest galaxy, and all of them ‘have different motions, speeds’ and duration between birth and extinction.

In such a nested Universe the concept of time must be always considered local, applying only to the internal clocks of the system referred.

For example, Einstein’s time dilation of light space-time, when coming to a black hole, till ‘time’ halts, does not mean the entire Universal time ‘stops’, but merely the ‘clocks of time of that light space, called ‘frequency’.

And indeed, we see the light elongating its frequency, slowing down its tics till erasing and dying. But when we get old, also our time clocks slow down, so a child feels much thoughts and events than an old man, till the old man stops its time, becomes a quiet, still form of space and dies.

Hence we can establish a new ‘Physics of Time’, where besides spatial motions in relative instantaneous presents, we study the creation, evolution, life and death of systems whose heads/particles store time clocks and its spatial bodies/waves move them. The hypothetical big bang of space-time of the whole Universe thus must be considered just the larger space-time cycle we perceive, according to the ‘fundamental duality’ of the Universe – the metric of the 5th dimension:

Λ. Space x Time = Constant.

That is larger beings have slower, seemingly lasting longer from an outsider’s perspective space-time ‘existences’, durations… But small clocks turn much faster, so an insect ticks 10 times faster than a mammal, and he feels in 7 years 70 years of events, as we humans do, and an atom also feels 10up to 40 times faster than the Universe – the relationship between both clock vortices/forces…

Time physics and the study of ‘waves’ of time that move through the ‘5th dimension’ of evolutionary time from past to future thus widens enormously the understanding of time beyond Physical studies of it as a parameter of its ‘space physics’.

Hence we shall describe a mathematical, topological game, of assemblies of space-time parts, which deploy a biological, survival game of exchanges of energy and information, or ‘åctions of absorption and emission of spatial energy and temporal information’ (∆a: moving/expelling energy: ∆e: feeding, absorbing energy; ∆ï: gauging, absorbing information; ∆œ: iterating, emitting information, and ∆u: communicating, gathering in social groups and dissolving your inner social structures, dying).

Now, this simple scheme, describes a game of existence which is organic, vital in its ultimate purpose: entities made of vital spatial energy, Sp, and temporal, cyclical, logic information, Tƒ, stored in the 2 geometric forms of maximal motion (the line of fields and limbs) and maximal volume (spheres of information), which exchange internally energy and information through hyperbolic waves/bodies to reproduce the system, and externally to move, feed, perceive, survive and evolve socially. And the way all systems do so, is by coding into their memorial, geometric, internal, cyclical paths those 4+i åctions of ∆±e,i exchange of spatial energy and temporal information.

So particles code those åctions of space-time in quantum numbers that describe them mathematically, living cells in genetic numbers, living organisms in the instincts of its 4 drives of existence, human beings in social memes and so on. But the bottom line is that we shall be able to describe all events, forms and structure sod the Universe with those simple principles and that simple game of survival, with topological forms.

Since of all the first principles of reality none is more fundamental than Space and Time, the two primary ‘formal motions’ of reality, and nothing matters more than the game of creation, survival and extinction, which all systems perform. Mathematics and biology does marry together. But also, and this is the huge novelty of this T.Œ, all those systems will show to have a point of maximal information, or zero-point, center of the system, which enacts those åctions and guides the whole system – and this perceptive, gauging point and its properties will allow us to introduce concepts such as minds, languages, mathematical and biological laws, within the structure of the T.Œ, not as something outside reality but as the necessary mapping of all beings, which need to perceive first, and create a still frame of reference in which to orientate its space-time åctions.

Those will be the thoughts of God, we shall translate in 2 types of structural equations that describe any system of space-time:

Its space-time symmetries: Sp<ST>Tƒ that define the 3 parts of all systems and its relative entropic/reproductive and informative motions:

Sp: limbs/fields of energy<ST: reproductive waves/bodies>Tƒ: heads/particles of information.

And the 5 ‘åctions of space-time’ they perform across different U±∆ relative planes of different size/speed of the 5th dimension:

±∆a (accelerated motions), ±∆e (energy feeding), ±∆œ (iteration), ±∆ï (observer’s perception), ±∆u (Universals creation).

Such is the simplicity of the vital Pantheist Universe: all systems are made of the same 2 formal motions, space≈energy and time≈information, all perform 5 simple åctions in space-time to refill its energy and information and reproduce before extinction in order to survive. And all form parts of stronger wholes to ensure their survival and are made of internal parts, hence have an organic structure of co-existence of parts and wholes, which we formalize with the metric of the 5th dimension.

Only anthropomorphism that takes away vital properties to far removed entities (specially physical systems, very different from our life systems in appearance, but not in structure), and the use of multiple jargons in each discipline of science to define the same parts, the same motions and the same biological åctions makes the Universe seem so different in each parts.

Thus we shall unify with a philosophical jargon all those ‘existential space-time beings’ and evolve further the mathematical study of those 3 elements, whose properties correspond to the 3 canonical sections of mathematics, spatial geometry, temporal, sequential algebra, and organic 5D scalar analysis of infinitesimal parts and integrated wholes – a fact that justifies the nature of mathematical logic as an experimental science, since its 3 parts do correspond to the 3 parts of T.Œ, and so it should not come as a surprise to the reader that the laws of mathematical logic are ultimately the laws obeyed by all fractal space-time beings.

In the graph, the Universe is made of its 3 time motions, which can be perceived statically as space, as  an assembly of ‘existential beings’, in an infinitesimal ‘tic of time’ , ∂t, which differ in duration for each species (tic is the unit we shall use here of fractal time, different for each species’ clock of existence), are seen as ‘fixed’ topologies of space.

Once we understand this ‘paradox of Galileo’ (the impossibility to distinguish between spatial states as stop forms and moving time, hence the equivalence between a time motion and a space state), we can talk not only of the 3 motions of time, but we do have 3 dimensions of space to match them. And so we talk of bidimensional formal motions, as the unit of the Universe – a mixed space-time surface with some internal motion.

This surfaces are therefore topological surfaces. As topology study motions within a form, which do not ‘tear’, that is break and transform of geometry. How many of such ‘bidimensional geometries’ there are in the Universe?

Here is where the first wonderful surprise jumps out of the ‘abstract world of mathematics’, to show mathematics is NOT that abstract actually but quite real, just the most general expression of the laws of 5d fractal (studied by analysis) space (studied by geometry) & time (studied by algebra) systems…

Since there are only 3 varieties of 2-manifolds. And so we shall consider them the ‘units’ of the real Universe.

Since as Minkowski put it: “Space of itself, and time of itself will sink into mere shadows, and only a kind of union between them shall survive.”

We thus shall talk more than of pure spatial forms and temporal motions of 2-manifolds of form and motion together, which we can see as 2 dimensions of motion, 2 of form, or a combined form-motion dimension, of the following 3 motions of time and 3 forms of space:

  • Lineal entropic motion ≈ toroid form
  • Cyclical time motion = circular, spherical form
  • Wave-like motion = Body-wave form

And affirm that all what exists is an assembly of those 2-manifold membranes, which are put together in layers to form a 3rd dimension or seen along its symmetric motions, to create more complex ternary of six fold structures.

All what we observe are thus knots and ties of such motions with form, ‘times’ become ties, when the motions become relatively fixed to each other in knots that create spatial forms, those symmetries between time motions and spatial forms define the construction of an assembly of beings with heads/particles that gauge information and direct and stop and go stop and go alternately beat of space-time, form motion rhythm that creates and defines all beings in existence:

Still-space-mind-perception of form/information > Time Motion > Still space

This beat and those symmetries between the 3 diffeomorphic=finite=local relational dimensions of space and time conform the reality we see:

1st Ðimotion: Non-E points-singularities of Informative perception:§ð@.2nd Ðimotion: Lineal & Angular momentum: $t. 3rd Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Bod waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏. 4th Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂. 5th Ðimotion: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T

When we consider any space-time symmetry we must add a 3rd ‘aspect’ to the space-time ‘iceberg’ membrane in 2 dimensions of relative motion and form or momentum of the being.
What the being is doing? An action of space-time consisting on emitting or absorbing spatial energy and temporal information. Why?  Because that is the ‘program of existence’ – the conservation of the timespace of any entity, which is a world in itself. Thus when we ‘explode’ the principle of conservation of time, and its lineal and angular momentums, its head and particles, waves and bodies, limbs and fields, the interaction of the generator equation, into infinite individual points of view, all of them try to survive by ∆A, E, I, O, U.

Thus the topological cycles of timespace must be also understood as energy information exchanges between the entities and its relative planes of existence in the fifth dimension. All system absorb energy and information from lower micro states, iterate their form through seminal seeds, evolve socially with others, and perceive, gauge information from a mathematical geometric point of view.

We thus shall study time cycles first in its simplest geometric forms, and causal inverse logic between its first and third age, and then its meaning as åctions performed by relative fractal points of view, which trace ‘momentums’ with its active magnitude with the biological reason of performing its åctions of existence, tending to increase the survival and conservation of its energy information and overall time duration.

We must say that all beings do time cycles to survive, and to survive they must replenish the energy and information of its 3 ternary symmetries of space-time(bodies/waves, limbs/fields, particles/heads) and so they trace cycles in the outside Universe. Let us then study in a great landscape all those elements together latter analyzed one by one and in the milieu of each detailed description of each species of the Universe.

The 5 cyclical ‘Actions’.

Now time cycles and åctions are the same. This might surprise the reader. In Physics they are measure as angular momentums (h-Planck) or as circular paths that balance the potential and kinetic energy (principle of least action), which is the S=T point of the hyperbola, or ‘steady state in which S=T, Max. S x T is achieved, the point of immortality of the cycle.

The cycle thus is NOT a geometric cycle except for very simple forms of angular momentum – which are visible as a cycle, but we can transcend some properties of the cycle of simpler closed knots to other more complex ‘knots’ of multiple cycles.

The mathematical treatment here though has been too poisoned by the spatial theory of reality so we rather use an entire new approach, based in the ‘functions’ of those repetitive cycles, or ‘space-time åctions’ that all beings trace.

As we can then easily order causally all of them in 4 basic åctions (energy and information absorption and emission, ±∆œ).

Thus an action is a derivative of the function of existence of the being that is its composed quantity of particle/head: knots of time cycles, and lineal inertial motions (limbs) and its body/field combinations.

Actions in more complex beings that particles though are to be seen as drives of existence, the biological concept for a being who perceives information, ∆ï, iterates=reproduces information, ∆œ, feeds on energy (∆e) moves expelling energy, ∆a, and finally as an integral of those other åctions, during its worldcycle ’emerges’ in a larger Universal ST-plane of existence (∆ST=∆+1)

Probably the most important isomorphism of the Universe is the existence of 5 æ,e,ï,œ,û åctions which conform the program of the Universe:

Change of motion or acceleration, ∆a, absorption of energy, ∆e, of information, ∆ï, reproduction, or iteration ∆œ and social evolution, social union from individuals into Universals, ∆u.

Actions are always exchanges of energy and information between two ∆-∆ planes of existence. And so there are 5 åctions:

Social relationships between i<-i(∆=0): Au.

Seminal seeds: ∆->∆-1 ∆=1): AI

Energy feeding: ∆->∆-2: Ae.   Informative perception:  ∆->∆-3: Ao; and changes in motion: ∆-∆-4: Aa.

Actions thus require to understand the other form of travel through the 5th dimension – not a temporal travel through the ages of evolution, in which the whole system is carried through the metric of the 5th dimension; but a travel that involves only the ‘transfer’ of energy or information, between two poles.

And so we dedicate a whole post, to understand this fundamental element of the 5th dimension: transfer of ‘Spatial Momentum’ Sp, or Spatial Energy, Sp between two planes and its inverse: transfer of form. In this post we will briefly analyze and classify åctions in physical, biological and social systems, and study the 5 åctions briefly.

Actions in a single plane of existence.

Physical Actions

In physics an action is the fundamental present, ST element of the Universe that combines energy and time:

Spe x Tƒ =∫ ST

So for example, a Planck constant is an action of Energy and Time: Ex T = H

We are not using though the same concept in relational space-time, changing in this rare occasion the formula, as we prefer the qualitative concept for action, closer to the sentence that opens this paragraph: ‘don’t confuse motion, Sp, for action: Sp x Tƒ= ST’.

We thus call an action, the quanta of existence, a derivative or ‘unit of force’, which all systems display to exchange energy and information with the environment, to achieve in this manner the 2 higher goals of existence: reproduction and social evolution of parts into wholes, new units of a higher plane of the 5th dimension.

We could consider then all possible ‘åctions’ of past-energy and future-information that combine together. Action is the ‘short’ present dimension, the most complex, rich and important element within a single plane of existence. And the study of this basic concept of physics and its ∆ST equivalent: combinations of form and motion into purposeful åctions is essential to many fields and science.

Social Actions.

But probably the man who better understood its concept in the upper scales of life was Hemingway in the above sentence; for an action to be meaningful it must have both motion (P) and form (F), yin and yang, in purposeful combination. Most motions today are confused with åctions – demonstrations without purpose. Social Actions must have a point-like directionality, a form, a goal. 

Thus the classic concept of physics and normal language, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this (action)’ do open a wide field of physical, biological and psychological, social analysis.

Actions in multiple planes of existence.

We can also consider åctions from the perspective of the ∆-metric, in its ‘existential mandate’.

Indeed, the function of existence of any vital space system surrounded by time cycles, is the multiplication of those time cycles of exchange of energy and information from the surrounding world. This means a series of exchanges with the U±4 planes of the Universe with whom the organism of space-time interact, which try to maximize the content of energy and information of vital space and cyclical time of the system.

Thus if we establish a Mandate of Existence, or ultimate meaning of a vital-space-time world:

Max.   Sp x Tƒ = ST±4

We can deduce from the exchanges of energy and information with the ±4 Universal Planes with whom the U∆ system communicates, the 4±∆ type of åctions any system in the Universe performs.

Thus relational space-time define a much wider concept of an action, as the fundamental tool of classification of the space-time cycles in which a form changes its relationships with the absolute space-time in which it exists by exchanges of energy and information (space-time cycles).

Actions in ∆ST allow us to classify all time cycles, study its sequence in world cycles and consider all the patterns of ‘inter-action’ between the fractal non-Sp=i points of the Universe

In the next graph we see the main 5 åctions of all systems in the main Universal Planes of Reality:

In ∆ST, however we define a much wider concept of an action.

An action is better understood in normal languages: an action is what all entities of the Universe constantly do. Our program of existence. And it can be mathematically defined with the tools of Existential Algebra. Thus we define an Existential action:

‘ An action is a flow of energy and information between 2 consecutive planes of existence: ∆-∆≤A≥∆-(∆+1) ‘ 

Since 0±4 are the planes of existence, it follows that there are only 4 possible Actions.

Thus we divide åctions into 5 fundamental types in which the ∆-being relates through exchanges of energy and information to each of the lower and single scale it perceives.

–  We absorb and process energy for our system, ∆Sp, we absorb and process information, ∆ï, we iterate our systems, ∆œ, we socialize in groups, ∆U, and we move around, accelerating and decelerating to do so, ∆Å.

And as it happens, we do all that by interacting between our ∆-∆ scale and a higher scale of reality:

We move through ∆-4 gravitational forces, which change our steady state (inertial speed) into acceleration and decelerations:  Aa: ∆a(∆-4>∆-3)

We perceive light and electronic quanta to inform ourselves: Ao: ∆ï(∆-3>-2)

We absorb ∆-2 energy quanta (amino acids) to recompose our bodies: Ae: ∆e(∆-2>-1)

We reproduce through ∆-1 seminal seeds which emerge in our scale: Ai: ∆r(∆-1>i)

(and for other species, NOT to provoke the anthropomorphism of humans we talk of iteration in other species, hence we call this action Ai.)

And we socialize with individuals like us creating societies that in its larger form become universal. Au: ∆u(i>∆+1). And that is why all fits nicely.5 ACTIONS

The æ,e,ï,œ,û of åctions is all what we do.

All what humans and everything else do are varieties of those 5 åctions. So write this 5th isomorphism with another simple equation:

∆a(∆-4>∆-3), ∆ï(∆-3>-2), ∆e(∆-2>-1), ∆œ(∆-1>œ),and ∆u(œ>∆+1)

This is the simplest mathematical and conceptual definition of the åctions of reality.

The 5 åctions in humans and other species.

In the next graphs we see the concept of åctions. In the first – a decades old graph, I omitted motions, the lowest action and included generations, an action above the ∆+1. Yet since now I consider ∆+1 generations, as part of Time Theory (evolution in ∆+1 planes), and have changed my consideration of ∆-4 accelerations as part of Space theory, we could exchange those åctions. i am not doing so much corrections for laziness and also to show the ‘continuity’ of the whole Universe. The choice though comes from the philosophical considerations:

‘An action requires a conscious will by the individual 0-point of the system which performs it’.

In that regard, the choice is ambivalent, but motion seems to be more conscious than the passing of multiple generations, which beyond reproduction is not an individual action. Of course, ∆ST is a perfect structured Universal order created not by humans, but by Reality and my perception of it has improved with time. Still the graph is a nice portrait of what åctions are in multiple planes of existence, performed by many ∆-species.

Deduction of åctions from the metric of the 5th dimension and the existential force .

We can also consider åctions from the perspective of the ∆-metric, in its ‘existential force’ mandate: Max. [∑ Sp ≤ ≈ ≥ Tƒ]±4

It is obvious then that the åctions describe are those related to Energy and Information exchanges between those elements: Spatial Motion and Energy feeding are the Sp related åctions, Perception of form, Tƒ, and iteration through a language of genetic information, i, are the two åctions related to Tƒ and i. And finally Social evolution, Max. ∑, is the 5th action. Actions thus are born of the survival program of the existential force of a system and its organic structure.

We can in that sense consider primary, external; secondary, internal and complementary åctions.

All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions, which are MOTIONS WITH FORM, Sp x Tƒ events that combine the 2 elements of reality.

What are the types and purpose of those åctions?

If we depart from 2 motions, energy and information, expansive and implosive motions, we can combine try to obtain more of them in ONLY 5 Invariant åctions:

Sp åctions:

∆a: The simplest one motion, which accelerates, reaches a steady state and decelerates in its 3 ‘ages’  (external motion). But we could also can be considered to be internal motion, of generational ages (the one represented on the graph). What defines in that sense ‘motions’ is the limited capacity of the ‘∆-being’ to modify it.

– ∆e (feeding) on energy to create the structural pieces of the body/wave.

Tƒ Actions:

-∆ Tƒ

– ∆Ei: SxT: Reproductive Communication; SxT: creation of complementary systems, which sometimes we group together as ‘present’ reproductive åctions.

Energy feeding and reproduction are mixed åctions since they process both energy and form, so they are secondary åctions. Perception and motion are pure Sp an Tƒ åctions.

– Social Actions; Au.

There are different åctions in society according to which scale we relate and the languages we use.

there are 3 types of languages, ∏-temporal genetic, ∑-spatial and ⊕, organic social growth in the final stage of the S9=∆+1 creation of a Universal through Social scales.

∏Tƒ creation of genetic informative networks, in which all systems are connected, for simpler societies.

∑Sp: energy herding in the same scale over a extended spatial word…

⊕ Sp Tƒ; the more complex societies, which signifies the creation of networks and social classes, the informative upper, reproductive body and energetic classes, distinguished by its degree of connectedness.

Since in the upper class, each ‘neuron/particle’ communicates with all others, through its axons/bosons, forming a ‘whole’ new ∆+1 unit (hence the multiplicative symbol as axons are the square of its neurons).

On the other hand, the ∑-scale of reproductive individuals are only connected to their spatial neighbors (and their genetic families). Thus it is easier for the far more connected neuronal caste to control its body herds of loose cells/atoms with those ‘axons/cyclical waves’. And it does so with nervous messages, invaginating the lower ∆-1 chemical language of cells with nervous receptors, or the gravitational with electromagnetic waves.

Finally the quanta of the energy level is disconnected and easy prey for the body herds.

Unlike disconnected quanta or herding of parallel quanta in the same ∆-plane by simple communication with neighbors to maintain distances, or reproduction of a wave that imprints its form in a lower scale, ∆-1, network creation is multiplicative, ∏, as the number of axons is a potency law of its neurons and this makes it more powerful. Since it has a faster language to connect at the ∆+1 scale, but a potency of its numbers communicating in the lower chemical scale in neurons or gravitatomagnetic language in physical systems.

Thus as we see the field of åctions analysis gets more complex in terms of information when we study the higher åctions. And it gets more mathematical when we study lower åctions.


non reversed 5th Dimension

All energy-information cycles can be described as action-reaction systems that have 2 directional arrows, which close the cycle OF SPACE-TIME, and reach a maximal at √Se2 + Ti2 =  1.

This essential cycle of existence thus takes from the hyperbolic function, which is both the shape of a cycle seen from outside and inside, two states of all systems, and develops it either as a wave (sequential perception on lineal time of it), or as a rotational angular momentum (internal perception).

Thus at Sp=Tƒ, √SxS+TxT=1, the system maximizes its existence and finds a balance, which is the steady state, reproductive, iterative, present point that tries to conserve itself.

And to that aim there it comes to the rescue of the system the invariance of angular and lineal momentum, which rest on the isotropy an isomorphy of the Universe.

Why isotropy and isomorphy are needed deals with issues of continuity known to experts, what matters here is that between two relative U∆ planes of existence, the perception by the upper ∆observer which initiates communication of the ∑∆-1 -∆e-nergy quanta is null. It is precisely in the border in which energy quanta appear as mathematical Euclidean points with no breath, where the limit between infinitesimals and quanta continuity happens. This is the h -kingdom, where h is both the h-Planck, or minimal constant of action of any Universal plane, and the h of the derivate, the minimal action, the infinitesimal quanta that sums in the derivate that constructs and destroys with its anti-derivative, integrative function, different planes of existence.

where energy and time mix into åctions, till finally the cyclical action ends, returning the form or event to its origin.

Cyclical åctions are thus made of energy and time and are the fundamental unit of the Universe:

 Action =  ∆ Energy x Time-information

For each species, each vital space and each clock of time in connection there is a discontinuous, quantic åctions, mixture of lineal momentum and angular cycle. The Earth, of a cesium wave, of a living being (a circadian cycle) have all a different morphology and content of space and time, because they reflect the cyclical, action -reaction dual arrow that changes each different being.



“A perfect ∏ is an ∞ Present’ Ls  On the immortal information of time world cycles, repeated ad infinitum in new generations 

The connection more important in the world of stience is between GST and ®lgebra of Time.

¬Ålgebra is the study of the sequences of space-time cycles, its hidden causality and the phases of the existence of a supœrganism and its parts.

We give it also the name of i-logic (time perspective), ¬Ælgebra (mathematical perspective) or T.Œ, a Theory of the Organic Everything, scientific taoism, Generator Syntax, trinity, duality, you name it.

It is concern on how a Universe is constructed departing of 3 motions of time with different geometry that through synchronous, simultaneous actions regulated by cyclical patterns, networks and co-existing scales, becomes the complex œ-worlds we see around us.

In normal time theory all this sounds to mysticism. You just study motions in space with a simple formula v=s/t that makes time entropy and motion, in lineal fashion, and describe the motion of ensembles of beings with maximal detail and that’s that.

 The principle of cyclical inertia.

If the world is made of åctions, then it is cyclical because according to Newton, all action provokes a reaction of the same intensity and opposed direction, creating thus a cycle or field of space-time.

So movements are not lineal but cyclical, dual. Indeed, in the XX century, the real study of cosmological, macrocosmic space and the inner space of atoms, showed that everything moved in curves, in cycles, as clocks of time do. But aside from its partial application to Physics by Einstein that described space/time in curved terms, scientists kept using in their mathematical analysis the lineal Cartesian plane, origin of the linear principle of inertia.

We have to ad however a cyclical, inertial principle for atoms, galaxies and all temporal beings. In fact, cycles are represented with other type of numbers called complex numbers, which appear for that reason constantly in Einstein’s equations, in quantum mechanics and the mathematic models of this book.

The cyclical, eternal movement of sub-atomic particles, spins, galaxies and planets is natural to the Universe. Thus, we consider that the law of conservation of energy and its spatial expression, the principle of Linear Inertia, are partial cases of the Law of Cyclical Inertia. Or in geometrical terms, as Cusa and Kepler already noticed, and Non-EA Geometries proved, we say that a line is a section of a long curve; and a continuous action , a part of a discontinuous action -reaction cycle. Yet scientists disregard cyclical inertia, because they use a lineal, Cartesian plane in their mathematical representation of reality that tends to introduce errors of linearity in their analysis.

Thus, the next big difference between classic, lineal, continuous ‘Energy Physics’ and ‘Modern, Quantic Space-Time Physics’ is the principle of cyclical inertia.

Space-Time fields are cyclical, subject to external translation and morphological change.

We often forget that space-time is part of every process, not only a physical event. We live and die in space and time. Species evolve in space and time. Societies are subject to economical and historic, temporal rhythms that change their spatial form. Everything changes in space and time. Change is indeed the word we use to define a space-time field beyond the physical realm. Thus we consider 2 main types of space-time changes according to Aristotle: morphological change, studied by Biology and Theory of Evolution, which is mainly organic, inner change; and translation or external change, studied by classic Physics, which is concerned with change in position.

Galileo defined translation, the external change of Space-Time fields, with the equation of speed, V=S/T, a machine to measure it, a clock and a bidimensional plane to plot that speed. Today it is the main property of space-time we study. So quantic beings made of 4 dimensional temporal energy in perpetual, morphological, cyclical change are reduced to bidimensional planes and numbers, ‘points without parts’ that only change their physical, external movement.

In that process scientists deform 5 basic qualities of all space-time beings: their multiplicity; their dimensions of space and _time fields; their inner morphological change ; their cyclical trajectories, which imply 2 arrows of movement, back and forwards towards positive and negative directions; and their quantic nature, since all cycles which close into themselves, break reality into at least 2 discontinuous, quantic regions: the inner and outer zone of the cycle.

Those properties are so important to understand space-time that are in fact present at the clocks scientists use to measure the external change or ‘speed’ of any space-time field. Indeed, clocks, imitate the properties of a cyclical space-time field and so they are quantic, cyclical objects with 2 arrows in perpetual change, as any space-time field is. Because of that similarity between cyclical clocks and quantic space-time fields, scientists measure and compare with clocks the infinite cyclical changes of any quantic, fixed species of space-time. Each of those changes has a rhythm that scientists translate to the rhythms of their clock.

Yet, scientists latter fit those space-time fields into a bidimensional, Cartesian mathematical graph whose X and Y coordinates ‘extend’ time and space towards the infinite, transforming their 2 cyclical, geometric arrows into a lineal, single space-time continuous form, with a single arrow of energy and movement, the so-called arrow of entropy.

Thus those quantic, dual, cyclical fields of space-time become a single, lineal field. It is the main blunder of history of science that lingers today in all disciplines and hence it is the first of our 5 errors we have to correct to be able to fully grasp what those quantic space-time fields are.

The 2 arrows/organs of quantic space-time: energetic entropy ‘bodies’ and informative ‘brains’.

The geometrical description of those 2 directional arrows of the Universe, backwards and forwards, completes a visual cycle, which returns to its origin. Yet the conceptual meaning of a dual action -reaction cycle, in which the reaction ‘undoes’ what the action did previously, is far more revealing: a cycle implies that a certain parameter that grew in the active part of the cycle becomes destroyed in its reactive event. If we grow in energy in the first part of the cycle, we consume that energy in the second part, and hence we complete a feeding-digestive cycle.

If we ‘live’ in the first part of an existential cycle we ‘die’ in the second part and return to the space-time dust from where we came. So we can see a geometric cycle of space-time as a representation in 2 dimensions of those 2 arrows that move forwards and backwards any being, till returning to its origin, from conception to death.

Yet the Universe is 4-dimensional and a cycle is a bidimensional form. So in 4 dimensions that dual back and forth arrow shows through an expansive and implosive rhythm. For example, the big bang describes the energetic, explosive arrow of a process that will end with the opposite arrow of implosive order and in-formation, or big-crunch. Then the Universe will explode again.

The form of the cycle has changed, since now we observe a space-time field fluctuating in 4 dimensions, but the opposite arrows of the cycle, that we shall call from here on the arrow of ‘growing, spatial energy’, the arrow of ‘growing temporal, informative order’, and the fluctuation between both that complete a space-time action -reaction cycle, remain the same. So we can translate spatial, static, geometrical figures into dual, dynamic arrows, which are the ‘organic’ essence of those geometric, morphological changes:

– Å positive, creative direction of informative time that warps, orders and informs a certain quantic region of the Universe, causing the accumulation of informative forces and linguistic, genetic memories that originate the organic evolution of life as time passes. So masses order space fields of forces into cyclical particles of information, brains order organisms, black holes order galaxies and DNA orders cells as time passes.

– And a negative direction of energetic space, organic disintegration and explosion of information into energy, that expands space, which becomes the destructive arrow of death, of entropy, of big-bang processes, studied by physical sciences. So masses explode into A-Bombs, black holes into quasars; cells and organisms die and erase their physiological order, while societies tumble their governments or destroy themselves in wars.

– Which together, enacted in each space-time field by energetic organs or ‘relative bodies’ and informative organs or ‘relative Heads’, create the ‘fluctuations’ we call ‘life or existence’.
The 2 opposite arrows of a space-time cycle mean that all processes that take place in each quantic piece of space and time are processes with 2 ‘ages’, one of energetic entropy and one of informative order that put together complete the 2 phases of any cyclical process that cancel each other. All quantic pieces of reality can either emit energy moving in lineal trajectories, or create order, informing, perceiving, organizing reality. All organisms exist in time through those 2 arrows, one of temporal information, and one of energetic entropy.

They were discovered and studied first in depth by Boltzmann, the founder of Thermodynamics, which already acknowledged both arrows. Yet the 2 arrows of time were unfortunately discharged when Einstein consecrated the idea of a single universal space-time and big-bang theory discovered that the Universe was in its energetic, expanding entropic arrow. Thus if space-time was a lineal, single continuum every form of the Universe had to be on the entropic, energetic arrow. So Physicists tend to work with a single ‘energetic’ arrow, the arrow of disorder, of entropy. Yet the arrow of order, of information is at the core of all other disciplines of knowledge from Biology to Philosophy where we find the 2 arrows of life and evolution (creation of in-form-ation) Vs. death and devolution (extinction and destruction of form, released into energy.)

The error of a single arrow proper of Astrophysics occurs because the Universe is so huge that its dual arrows of life and death last far longer than those of any human being. So now we exist within a Universe dominated by the direction of negative entropy and disorder because we are closer to the explosive big bang. For that reason Physicists use only the arrow of energy, since they consider the Universal space-time the only one.

But in the future, surely the arrow of information will create the big-crunch and informative warping of the Universe. Further on, in a quantic Universe there are many quantic space-times, and each one is in a different arrow, regardless of the big-bang entropic phase of the total Universe. For example, we exist in a quantic part of that Universe, called a galaxy, which right now is warping into a form with more information under the mass effects of a central black hole. Hence it is in the informative arrow unlike the entire Universe.

Thus the fundamental analysis of any space-time field/cycle of reality consists on studying first the dual energetic and informative parts of the field as we perceive it in space; and the consider how those 2 organs create alternating cycles of existence in time, ordering and disordering reality through the 2 arrows of entropy and complexity, putting finally the spatial, static and temporal, dynamic analyses together into an organic vision of the being.

We call that methodology of knowledge that guides this book, the ternary principle. Let us then make a generic analysis of the 2 energy and information organs of any Quantic Spaces-Times in space and the 2 homologous cyclical arrows or events they cause in time, that we will latter apply to all the main Quantic Spaces-Times beings of the Universe.

ΔΩ. The program of existence.

What does a Point of view, an existential momentum, a fractal exi=st-ence, a zero-point, a function, program, equation of Existence once it is born as a single seed of an ∆-1 plane? How does it go to create a Cyclical existence, a sum of Actions ∑Sp≤ ∫∂x≥Tƒ, which move a function of existence through all its cycles of exchange of energy and information with the universe.

The Universe is made of 2 motions, lineal motions of space and cyclical motions of time, webbed into ‘planes of existence’, which human minds see still according to the ‘Galilean Paradox’.

Thus its structure is described by 3 basic formal languages:

– ∆-geometry (Non-Euclidean), which explains space & Causal logic (non-Aristotelian) which explains its time cycles, (hence our use of the next letter ‘i’ for this formalism), and organicism which explains the organization of the different planes (biological languages).

And yet there is a 4th language and property of the Universe, which surely abstract scientists will deny but it is there, and so it has been always argued by human beings, the language of the Will, which creates the needed order to organize those motions.

Indeed, we can describe externally objectively reality with its geometries and time cycles, and its organized planes of existence, but the question that remains to be answer is why? What causes those systems to organize themselves.

The answer is what I have called in different moments, ‘the program of existence’ or ‘Universal mandate’ (external vision of it in impersonal or mystical terms), the Will or Equation of Existence or Survival (internal vision), which resumes in a simple ‘partial equation’ of the Metric Generator of the 5th dimension:

Max. Sp X Tƒ

  • Systems that perceive in a rather automatic manner with O-minds minimal time cycles (∆ï∆-3) and move in invisible fields of force with Sp-nergetic limbs, through lineal paths (∆Å∆-4)….

And we call those external 2 åctions the external, or automatic will or primary åctions of existence. If we were to use the terminology of Leibniz or Aristotle, it would be the process of ‘apperception’, or ‘vegetative will’. Since they are automatic, caused by the mere structure of the being, which exists in a lower field of motion and absorbs bits of information.

Yet the external åctions have 2 internal counterparts, which ensure the maintenance of the components of energetic limbs (feeding on energy) and the informative system (reproduction of ‘form’):

  • First, the being feeds on quanta bigger than the bits of information to reproduce its forms, and this process is called feeding, ∆Sp∆-2.

The origin of reproduction are the åctions of the being that communicates its 2 poles, in an intermediate region, the body or wave, in which it exchanges flows of motion and form, between both poles of existence, combining them first into cyclical åctions, SxT, performed by those intermediate waves and bodies. And so åctions is the 3rd will, through which the being tries to maximize its ‘function of existence’. And the repetition of åctions finally creates a ‘burn-in’ reproduced structure, which becomes its 3 element, which allows the being to  survive in other form. Thus the 3rd will or action of all beings is iteration. Since reproduction of its body waves ensures its immortality beyond accidental or old age, death by excess of energy and information. And so the being reproduces its ∆-1 cellular structures, ∆R∆-1, till they organize themselves into a replica that surface at the ∆-plane.

And we call those 2 wills of existence, the internal will, and in terms of Aristotle’s classification, the animal will.

  • And yet there is a 5th will that helps to maximize the function of existence: the social gathering in groups coordinated by a common language, which make the whole stronger. So ∑SxT > SxT.

Thus it starts the scalar growth of herds into bigger social herds that hunt together. We express this gathering with the symbol of S for society or sum, but most often with the specific symbol of ∑ a summation (here not used in the strict mathematical sense of ‘a series’ but merely as an aggregation of individuals). And we say that the summation of individuals which gather through simple ‘spatial languages’ that coordinate them bring about a series of social groups or Unions of Individuals represented by those 3 symbols, ∑, S, U (i will try to unify symbology, time permitted).

It is this simple scheme what explains the formulae: ∑e=S, that is a group of quanta, points of a herd, e x Tƒ beings brings together a ‘space’, which is a bidimensional topology or loosely connected network that extends through a social space.

But and this is the final frontier of the will, as the space becomes denser in a single plane, organization must become more complex, and the equality rule breaks, as new languages of faster cyclical speed, Max. Tƒ, allow better coordination. And so society splits between the faster neurons and the bigger cells, Max. Tƒ and Max. Social classes of the system. The efficiency though has a heavy toll for the bigger, slower cells that must obey without doubt the neuronal, informative class. And so finally a 2-layer structure, with top neuronal fast points and body cells appears.

Further on, the energetic, simpler will of motion, is demoted in the hierarchy, as those cells must ‘expand entropically’ the space below them at ∆-4 level and so often the system stores ∆-4 species and creates a 3rd energetic layer of hardy cells, responsible for this carnage. And those are the cells of the limbs: informative neurons, ‘reproductive’ glandular cells and ‘muscle and bone cells’ to use specific types of an organism, becomes the 3 social classes of the organism, which maximize its åctions of existence.

Now, the informative cells must rule the body and limbs cells and so they must connect with all of them, and at the same time they must coordinate among themselves fast their orders to produce synchronicity. And so they often develop axons (in biological systems with a network fractal orientation in the high dimension of information) or produce informative spherical waves (in physical systems existing in an isomorphic medium, where the informative pole tends to be in the center of the wave), which reach simultaneously all the cells of each layer.

In both cases we talk of a multiplicative effect. For example, if all the neurons are connected to all, the number of axons is x². And so we use for the ‘organism’ in multiple layers, the symbol ∏, for ‘pi’ (circular motion) and for multiplication (the higher number of axons, or ∑².

And we can write then the complete will of existence through its 5 åctions of motion or acceleration, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution as:


And this 5th will or action, ∑∆+1, completes the game of existence,

This is the will of the Universe, its sequential program: o->æ->e->œ->û

acceleration and perception (with different order depending on the informative or energetic nature of the being), which brings feeding and reproduction, and finally the social evolution of the system.

This is what all beings do to maximize their existence: ∑SxT

Further on, the program is externally reinforced because those who follow it survive better. And so those who don’t perish, do not reproduce and do NOT exist in the future.

The constants of iterative creation: ST

 The Universe reproduces åctions: Sp x Tƒ=ST, åctions of existence which combine entropy and information, into present waves bodies of energy and information.

The minimal unit of the Universe is an action of space-time, a momentum of existence, and once we localize one we can study it at many levels.

Actions though can be considered cyclical, mostly produced by an ∆+1 entity as expression of its existential exchanges of energy and information with the surrounding Universe.

A function of existence, Sp x Tƒ = ST±4, maintains a rhythm of repetition of its ‘åctions’, which create waves, radiations from a focus.  The webbing of those åctions of existence form a world cycle, and the world cycle carries the 3±1 ages of space-time topologies. And so there is a chain order of a higher degree of detail, when we consider the different type of Reprod-åctions; åctions of existence, the being performs in its polar game between body and mind:

Actions of Existence, ∆A±4 , O±3, ∆E±2; ∆œ, ∆U±1.

A certain being will have certain internal constants that relate its Sp and Tƒ, body-head, wave-particle dual systems through similar dimensions. Most often, ∑Se ∆-1 ≈ ∑Tƒ, that is the number of cells of body and head, wave and particle is similar. In other cases the product in time of Tƒ cycles and Sp population of those cycles in simultaneous space is the same: ∑∆-1=∑∆.

 We shall study in this key post, the meaning of parameters, variables, magnitudes, constants, conservation principles and laws of science in terms of ∆ST metric.

That is, from the 4 fundamental elements of the Generator Equation: U= ∑ W: Sp x Tƒ = ST, the ‘world’, of space-time, which maintains a constant, balanced combination of its entropy and cyclical motions, by means of its ‘reprod-active’ action, ‘ST’, is the theme of this post and its sub-post.

What kind of ‘balances’, combinations and iterations, a world-system performs through its world cycle of existence, and how can we mathematically express the laws of balance between entropy and form that create and freeze the varieties of beings we perceive in the Universe? What is the relationship between those Sp x Tƒ =ST systems and its larger Space-time Plane, from where they are a relative fractal part, made to its image and likeness? Are both in a relationship of proportionality? What kind of laws rule the diversification of Sp x Tƒ = ST systems? And so on…

The ST enormous variety of meanings is the key to the multiplicity of the Universe, the rules that establish certain orders in those combinations (conservation laws, laws of balance and maximization of the Sp x Tƒ function of ‘existence’, etc.) are the laws that establish certain patterns of order, which allow its classification into ‘scientific knowledge’.

Let us remember in that sense the 2 main formulations of the Generator Equation:

Sp x Tƒ = ST, as a ‘spatial topology’ of 3 elements, (entropic limbs/fields x Particles/heads of information, which combine into reproductive åctions, bodies and waves)

Sp > ST  < Tƒ:  Dynamic flows of spatial entropy and temporal information combined or transferred through dynamic flows of energy and information, whereas the Spatial entropy or relative past element, cedes its energy=lineal motion> to a wave and the informative particle or relative future element, its form, to combine into a present form… Or in an alternative communicative wave:

Se x Tƒ <≈ (Se x Tƒ) ∆-1 > Sex Tƒ   two relative poles communicate motion and form through a smaller particle (fermions communicating bosons; any species communicating through a language in a social group, or herding into a hunting group, etc.)

Those 3 types of fundamental events in nature across different planes of reality define different ‘constants’ of åctions and ‘poles of maximal entropy and maximal information’ and ‘topologies of limbs/fields, bodies/waves and particles/heads’ and ages/states of entropy-past-youth, present-repetitive-mature age and old/informative/future age, which  are the core concepts behind the events and forms we study in ‘detail’.

Physical Systems. Its main constants, magnitudes and conservation laws.

We focus first in physical magnitudes, as we have studied the ‘ages of time’ and ‘topologies of organisms’ in greater detail in other posts.

Existence and åctions.

10 human scale informative scale

There is of course a deeper understanding in philosophical terms on the manner in which form and motion transcends through scales to be perceived by the human being, and why we only perceive those scales – namely because they are the ones we act upon. So we can build a human being as the sum of all those åctions across all its scales we perceive, from where an entire understanding of the program of existence of man, our will and what is ‘life and existence’ for us can be deduced.

This connects with the order of those åctions as a pyramid of ‘desires’, we do have a Maslow-like pyramid of åctions which emerge and require the previous one: to perceive we must move towards the perceived system, to feed we must perceive the food and move to it, to reproduce we need enough energy and genetic information in our body. And obviously to evolve socially we must reproduce previously

And since creation of social, organic networks, requires all other åctions, it is the summit of the ‘program’ of the ‘biological’ Universe that all its species follow. So åctions are ordered also in time, parallel to its symmetry in scales – relationship that between time ages and ∆-scales we have observed already in the study of the meaning of past, present and future, now further proved through the order of åctions:


Well it is not the same order than the vowels but almost (-;

Synchronicity of åctions among scales.

Finally another theme of importance regarding action, which we treat in other sections, mainly in time and planes are its synchronicity between planes, as the smallest åctions are faster and repeat more, so we do more ‘gravitational steps for each second-perception, and feed only once a day reproduce once a year and evolve socially through our entire life.  This is the most important reason for the order of the organic systems of reality.

For example, the faster åctions of cells (i.e. daily reproduction) are synchronized to the slower energy feeding cycle of its ∆+1 scale, which gives the energy it needs to put its information at work and enable the reproduction.

It also follows that the emergence of an action above, makes it a product of the lower ones Åi(∆-3) x Åe (∆-2) = Åœ-1

That is the cell takes its genetic, information coded in a few atoms, the energy obtained from above and reproduces the system.

This field needless to say is also huger.

The program of existence: Maximize your existence – evolve socially.

An exhaustive analysis of all events and åctions of all systems, from the 4+1 quantum åctions-numbers of particles to the 5 drives of existence of biological beings to the 5 quantum åctions of humans, show that all systems try to maximize its 5 survival åctions, according to the sequential and frequency laws aforementioned, creating a ‘Maslow pyramid’ of behavior for all of them – the program of the Universe.

The 5th action, though is often unwanted and hence not considered in most scientific studies, because it is most often imposed externally by the ∆+1 neuronal/informative, ‘superior’ species that absorbs the energy of the lower herd treated as energy. So it is not a ‘quantum number’ but the action of informative quarks that capture electrons to form the atomic organism.

It is not a human action, but the imposition of people-castes that control our languages of information (politicians with laws, bankers with money) and create states and markets that control and absorb our wealth. It is not the desire of cells in a multicellular organism, which are controlled in motion and information by neurons.

– Tƒ maximize your existence, Max. ∑Sp∆-1 <=>Tƒ∆+1, the simplest strategy is to maximize the components of the equation, the 4 positive arrows-åctions: Sp=energy feeding, I=information processing, <=> or X, Reproduction and ∑, social evolution and the selfless action of giving away your energy to sustain a ‘higher plane of forms’, which can be observed in the sacrifice of individuals from their nations, their subconscious collective Gods, or in physical space in the loss of form of individual orbitals when the pi or sigma molecular orbitals appear, or the transfer of energy from electric to magnetic fields and so on.

– This gives birth to the duality of ‘social arrows’, as the 4D arrow of herding among clone cells/waves to create ‘spaces’ (defined by Riemann as groups of ‘similar points’ described by properties of continuity, etc.’) might be called in mystique terms the arrow of ‘democratic, social love’ and extract and ethic generalization: forms that feel equal act in parallel and love each other; while the 5D arrow is hierarchical, Darwinian, as ‘forms who are different’ prey ‘perpendicularly’ to each other, transferring energy, Sp∆-1>Tƒ from the lower scale to the upper scale and information, Tƒ>Sp∆-1, from the upper to the lower scale. More deductions from the Program:

– You can maximize the function of existence when S=T->Max SxT (mathematical rule: 5×5>9×1).

This is known intuitively, as we say ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’ where Sp(body/field) and I (head/particle).

It is the origin of the need to have our vital constants in balance, of the balance of Universal Constants, which are Sp/O or SxT ratios (as in the equations of gravitational and electromagnetic constants, where q-m are clocks of information and distances, Sp, hence they write as F=Q,G(Tƒ/Sp).

It explains the attraction of beauty, a shape in which form and energy are balanced, S=T; the beauty of top predator species – a species that maximizes its body force (Sp), intelligence (O) and beauty (S=T), in physical space one with maximal M(T) x V(Sp) momentum, which in physical collisions survives and defines the final trajectory; the classic shapes of the commonest spiral galaxies, etc. It explains why live longer in our mature, S=T, age between energetic youth and informative 3rd age; why death happens by excess of energy (Max. Spin accidents and wars) or information (Max.Tƒ in the 3rd age when we warp and wrinkle); and many other facts.

– You can maximize your existence, when ∑->∞ that explains the huge quanta in spaces that last, from the ultimate vacuum of the Universe to the seas of water, to the power of ∑=Love in social systems, to the undistinguishable boson structures of immortal beings, from light to black holes (bosons of quark stars) to minds – ‘zero points’ that map out with self-similar pixels of information an external Universe into a linguistic infinitesimal image of it – to herds and waves that become tighter, multicellular organisms that survive better.

– It explains the engine of human existence: greed for Sp-food, Information, sex (SxT), 4D-love & 5D-power.

For example, if we are to consider informative systems alone, the creation of a boson, zero point in which an infinite number of self-similar, ∑-forms converge is another path to maximize the function of existence.

Thus the highest of all åctions is the social experience, and we can truly write those åctions in chains from the lowest one – physical motion, to the highest one – social love, reason why people like more prophets than physicists, the maximize more their existence.

So all what species do is: >O: Gauge information; <Sp: Feed on Energy; ∑Ei, herding with parallel beings or SxT, merge into complementary systems;  combining those simplex åctions in a single plane, across 3±∆ scales:

– Reproducing self-similar entities: ST>∑st∆-1>st or evolving socially with them into bigger networks, creating more complex planes of existence, fractal super-organisms: ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ

All what any entity including humans do during our entire existence from seminal cell to dying body, all can be explained with those 6 åctions: Feeding, informing, moving, reproducing and networking into social groups.

Further on each of the 5 ‘existential åctions’  form together a causal sequence, as complex åctions need previous simpler ones to ‘exi=st’

. Thus åctions, functions=forms=dimensions & time sequences are related, creating parallel invariances that define each  fractal’ diffeomorphic entity or ‘world’ constantly ‘filling’ with those dimensional åctions its vital space, part made to the likeness of the whole Universe:

– ∆ï: Any entity needs first to perceive-gauge information from an advantageous ‘point of view’. So all p.o.v.s, are ‘on top’ in the dimension of height, from heads to antennae to black holes.

-∆A, And then it needs to move changing its trajectory, hence accelerating to get to:

– ∆Sp: Then the entity will move to a field of energy to feed, through its faster lineal path. So ‘length’ becomes the dimension of energy and main body orientation, from ¥-fields to sharks.

– Then we communicate e<= >o with similar beings to herd or reproduce in ‘empty’ regions of space-time, so width becomes the reproductive or communicative 3rd spatial dimension, where we accumulate new cells, send our words as we walk in parallel dimension.

– We observe also those 3 perpendicular dimensions in ¥-light fields, corresponding to their diffeomorphic electric=informative, magnetic= energetic and reproductive c-speed, product of SxT (Maxwell’s equations). Since light is not an abstract, independent space-time background: Our mental space-time is made of ¥-information, so we share its Euclidean 3 Dimensions. Vacuum space is light. So background radiation cannot be extracted: it is space itself.

So the 3 Space-dimensions are functional åctions with a causal sequence:

Informing (Height)<Feeding (Length)>Communicating/reproducing (width).

The program of the Fractal Universe and its Generator Equation. The will of ST superorganisms.

Now if we eliminate the action of motion, for which the organism hardly needs more than limbs to take advantage of the flow of forces, we can search for the ‘inner will’ that motivate those åctions, the coding factors.

The 5th isomorphism of all ST super organisms is thus their program of existence or 4 Drives of Life, which biology ‘cracked’ regarding the living organisms it studies, since it carries the highest truth of all sciences.

As all isomorphisms, the need of systems to construct its 3±1 common ∆±1 dimensions of scalar space-time, energy limbs/fields/territories, reproductive bodies/waves/working classes & informative particles/heads /upper classes and ∆±1 social scales, determine the 3+1 drives of existence all Nature’s ‘surviving’ systems follow:

– Max.Tƒ: All gauge information with their heads/particles to guide their search for Energy or else they die.

– Max. Sp: All systems feed on energy with limbs/fields. Since if they don’t, they become exhausted and die.

– SexTƒSe=Tƒ: All reproduce/iterate/decouple into new organisms and particles. Since, as they are limited in time duration, if they don’t repeat their topologic structures they become extinct.

– ∑Sp, ∏Tƒ: All evolve socially into higher systems and associate with similar forms; whereas simple ‘energy beings/cells’ form ∑=herds, simply connected to hunt and feed; while complex, ‘informative beings/neurons’ form complex networks, in which each individual is connected to all others. Hence the ∏-multiplicative symbol counts not the informative neurons but the connective axons that make efficient ∏-networks dominate ∑-herds.

Thus we rewrite scalar Space-time Metric as a Fractal generator of the ∞ Wills of the Universe, which encodes all the isomorphisms, parts, events and scales of all its ST superorganisms: ∞∑Se∆-1≤ST≥∏Tƒ∆+1

The Generator equation’s 3±∆ symbols describe the fundamental particle of reality, its 3±1 Wills & ternary structure, both in time and space: a cellular, social, ternary organism, each one distinguished by a balanced set of Sp≈Tƒ vital, biologic or universal, physical constants, which freeze the energy and information of the being into stable, balanced proportions, which define a specific variety or ‘species’ of the fractal generator.

So we can translate all ‘laws’ of the different scales and species of all scalar sciences, and the ‘parts’ of its organisms, as events related to the 3±∆ ‘drives of existence’ of the Generator Equation of all systems. It is then possible to generate all what is real, departing from the Generator, the symmetries and Constant proportions among the 10Dis of reality and the laws of i-logic mathematics, as this writer has done in his research.


Non-Ælgebra of timespace. 

In complex ternary universes, the causality is not so clear as it is both deterministic – from a point of time yu can only go, ∆S ∆T (-∆S) and ∆ST (SxT) ¬st (•). So you do have 3+0 possibilities in a modular Universe: passive mental perception, increase of entropy, of information or iteration of both. It is the constant ‘choice’ of 4 equal paths of action/non-action, what determines the future and so it constantly branches into possibilities.

Yet those choices tend to be apperceived, programmed, following the automatic, vegetative or conscious program of survival, which tries to maximise the ∑ExI structure of the being conserving its present.

So the Universe is both deterministic (in 4 branches) probabilistic in the choice of them but ‘played with charged dices’, those of survival.

now we call the algorithm of survival that automatically has been ‘selected’ as the informative algorithm that replicates constantly in the Universe, the supœrganism in space, the world cycle in time, and the algorithm of survival, Max. ∑Spe<≈>Tiƒ, the generator equation, which constantly repeats by performing survival actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, Max. ExI, taken from a balanced background space≈time (st)…

Epistemological and mathematical definition.

st¡ence is ultimately concerned with the existence of beings. How they are generated, live and die, regardless of which are its particular nature – those are the foundational questions, which as Leibniz put it, must have answers related to its ultimate substances: 

Those substances are the energy and information of the being, product of the combination of its motions and forms, which we call ‘space-entropy-lineal motion’ and ‘time-form-cyclical motion’; as form is also a motion, albeit cyclical and hence perceived without detail by a slow observer as cyclical form.

In non-abrahamic ‘tribal, historic religions’, where God is a pre-axial-rational age wor(l)d to signify the subconscious collective of a tribe, God was always considered the ‘form’ or ‘in-form-ation’ that moulded as ‘logos’, the entropic lineal motions with no form, which where the first ‘existential manifestation of the being’.

To exist therefore it was required that from the immortal lineal motions and cyclical forms of the Universe, a ‘drop of yin’ felt into yang and vice versa. And this is the first moment of creation, when entropy, lineal motion acquires its first curvature of time; or when time, the first cyclical form, breaks its closed nature and emits a wave of communication that resembles its form.

We thus establish a generic equation of ∃xist¡ence, for all stiences of space-time beings of all ∆¡ scales of reality, which in a mathematical form, would read: M∫∃xi∂st: Maximize your existence by combining quanta of space and time, of entropy and information ∂s ∂t, into energy (max. s: lineal motion x min. t) and information (max. t x min. s)

2, 3, 4. The real function of existence: maximise body-head, wave-particle, mens sana in corpore sanum.

If we call the body-wave of the system its energy and its head-particle-mind its information, the previous function of existence becomes immediately real, as it merely means  that all systems of Nature try to maximise their energy and information, extracting from its external Space-time world, ‘bits and bites’ of both (∂s, ∂t), while maintaining in balance their body and mind, their particle-head in a complementary state (and their limbs/fields of entropy when they are also attached to the system, which often externalises this component).

The law of balance – synchronicity of clocks.

We have come to a biological mandate of survival, which all systems obey or else they do NOT exist. Hence all beings are existential beings that try to maximise its generator equation, its three parts, limbs/fields< body-waves>Particle/heads. And this is what we write in an acronym manner as the maximisation of the function of existence: Max. entropy x information = energy, achieved when entropy and information are in balance (as e=i maximise the product of both: 5 x 5 >  6x 4…

So a simple equation defines the behaviour of all systems that try to maximise its motions with limbs/fields, its perception of information with heads/particles, switching modularly between both states, to balance them e->i->e, and as a result they also maximise its ‘body-waves’ of energy, interating them along its world cycle of existence, being the ‘energy of the system’, the integration of all its parts, ∫e x i =st, across space, and its worlcycle across time such as:

Eω = ∫ M(e x i ) ds dt = 0

This amazingly simple equation thus resume all the world cycles of energy of all the systems of the universe.

‘To live is to exist, to perform the five actions that ensure your survival and maximise your drives of live FROM birth to extinction:

Max. exi=stº

MAX. entropy (limb motions) x Information (Particle-Head perception ) =ST (MAX. momentum)

Now this IS real. In physical systems is called the conservation of energy and momentum; in biological systems define the actions of top predators and the drives of life; in societies, the way countries maximise their reproductive economy, multiply its people and conquer other cultures…

And its detailed expression means that all systems of the Universe will maximise 5 sets of ‘step by step, bit by bit, bite by bid actions of entropy, information and energy’:

∆a≈-∆e: maximal motion (acceleration≈expenditure of energy)

+∆ø: maximal entropic feeding (energy taking = prey extinction)

ƕ: max. information (+perception, Рcommunication)

∆œ: Max. organic reproduction into an œffspring of new supœrganisms

∆û: Max. social evolution from individuals into Universals (parts into wholes).


In the graph, the fundamental actions of space-time of all beings, performed through its world cycle which can be considered the integral of the function of existence, ∑exi ≈st

So if we were to summarise the whole generator, into three clear equations, we would use the equation of the ternary dimensions of all systems (S<st>t), the acronym equation of existence, exi=st, and the more detailed ‘quantic expression’ of its actions, which put together become a zero sum: ∫a,e,i,o,u ds dt=Eω=0

This expression of the generator is useful because it is a dynamic function of variations and can immediately relate to reality, in a mathematical form. Indeed, if we consider that all systems do perform actions of existence (absorption and emission of entropy, energy nd information in its different forms of motion) by knowing the basic operandi that relate those terms,we give a huge lap in advance. Yet given the vastness of phenomena represented by such a simple function: e x i =s±t, (one of its more common mathematical sub-functions), we have a bridge between GST and mathematical science, we shall explore ad nauseam in those texts.

The center piece of the whole formal structure  of the Universe is thus the world cycle OF supœrganisms or fractal generator, a function of cyclical space-time, which describes a whole ðime§pace cycle in all its perspectives:

Γ.                    U≈∞ [Se≤≥St≤≥Tƒ]∆±∞

Its minute realization is the function of existence, integral sum of a series of actions the being displays ‘bit by bit’ of time-information, bite by bite of space-time energy and step by step of entropic motion. We call that function both in its ‘steps, bits and bites’ and integral form, the function of existence, and simply affirm all systems try to maximise such function.

What is existence is the mother of all questions. And yet the answer is simple: to exist is to act in space and time with the spatial energy and temporal information a being possesses, performing a series of space-time åctions, which allow the system to ‘feel energy-time motions’ and ‘perceive forms-still spaces, and ‘combine them in reproductive clones that will survive the end of existence’.  We call the repetitive patterns of åctions entities follow through its life-death cycles, the function of existence.

When we express the organic existence in space and sequential events in time of any entity of reality through human logic and mathematical, verbal and digital languages, we acquired knowledge on existence.

This knowledge is NOT necessarily human ‘scholar, scientific, academic, religious, social or artistic knowledge’. Humans have an enormous capacity to ‘invent’ using the ‘inflationary properties’ of information (which being an accelerated vortex of form explodes into ‘information’ that might not be related to reality). In that regard humans show an enormous capacity to invent existential theories, which are subjective and anthropomorphic but respond not to the reality of the Universe; where all systems perform the same ‘Program of Existence’.

Tƒ formalize this equalization of all systems of nature, we do define 3 scales of ‘existential space time’:

The simplest level in which systems made of vital spaces and temporal particles/heads, absorb and emit spatial energy and temporal information, combining it into åctions of existence. This is the æ,e,ï,œ,û ‘åctions’, the minimal units of reality, which become cyclical trajectories through space-time in which an ‘Active Magnitude’ or ‘point of existence’ exchanges energy and information with the outer ‘Absolute space-time World’ in which he is confined.

Each of those åctions of existence performed by Œ, the given function of existence, performed towards the survival of the entity and its form beyond its finite duration can be studied as a separated event. And this is how mostly physics acts: describing trajectories in space-time (without studying its survival biological finalities), of points of existence.

The second level is the study of those points of existence by integrating all its åctions. We then can define any entity as a knot of cyclical åctions of space-time, whose content in energy and information, becomes organized into ‘cellular/atomic parts’, which establish a complex organic pattern with 3 parts, the |-limbs/fields of lineal momentum, the O-heads/particles of informative perception and the Ø-bodies/waves of hyperbolic iteration.

This second level of awareness of reality and its structures thus studies how the existence of individual åctions of space-time become organized into the patterns of survival and social evolution, which define the more formal, complex structure of the Universe, till the system emerges as:

The super organism, the fundamental function of existence of the being. This is the whole study of the being, both in time, as a world cycle between birth and death and in space as a super organism extending across several layers of planes of the 5th dimension.

Thus in this first Isomorphism, resume of all others we merely expose the entity, introduce its space-time functions and translate its knowledge by classic science into the isomorphisms of relational space-time. And all this is embedded in the particular variety of its function of existence:

Œ: Se<ST>Tƒ

The function of existence, as such, œ, is the first element to define regarding the isomorphisms that apply to all systems of the Universe.

Once we have defined this function, œ(s,t), all other elements of the system will be found.

The complexity of the definition depends on the generator equation of the space-time fractal we decide to use.

A simple one is the ExI=C,  (Space x Time parameters = Constant), fundamental equation of relational, isomorphic space-time (∆ST or TS, the most widely symbols used in those texts, which represent both the isomorphic Space-Time theory and the Timespace, present iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic dual function that represents al systems of the Universe).

The function of existence, ∆ST, œ, ST, Se<ST>Tƒ, or whatever other way we want to represent it, is the central element of all descriptions.

Existential algebra, thus is a first for all systems that learn to exist.

Existence vs. extinction, through a world cycle made of åctions of existence, æ,e,ï,œ,û that exchange internal energy and information with external space and time, constantly going forwards and backwards in those flows is the whole game.

So it is also the first fact we must confront when ‘doing Spence’, that is, when studying the different, complementary systems of spatial motion and time cycles, across any of the U=ST planes of existence of the Universe, each one studied by a ‘stience’, is to ‘set up a domain’ or ‘ST±∆’ world or ecosystem in which to define and study a Superorganism and Worldcycle –  an Œ Point of existence.

We thus need to define the parameters of the U∆≈ ST system in its outer parameters of Space-Speed and Time-density, which can be deduced from different fundamental constants:

  • Constant, reproductive Speed, (Se x Tƒ of the absolute space-time)
  • Curvature Constant (gradient/acceleration/field strength: α/s) or the similar concept of:
  • Density (ρ: Tƒ/S)
  • Action (Se x Tƒ: Energy x Time constant)

Those are examples of possible Observables that can be used to deduce the fundamental parameters of the medium.

The internal parameters of the system will then be in proportionality with those of its absolute space-time, from where it obtains its energy and information. And so we shall find:

  • Time-speed of the vital system, which will be in synchronicity with the rhythms and åctions of the world system
  • Energy metabolism of the vital system, also in relationship with the energy cycles of its environment.

Once we have the fundamental parameters of speed-space and time-information of the system, externally and internally, we can further consider the main symmetries and ‘states’, and dimensions of those parameters, for the specific variety of species we observe.

And to that aim, we will start to tabulate its external åctions and frequencies.

Tƒ exist, to observe, move, feed on energy, reproduce information and evolve socially from part into wholes, by performing cyclical åctions of space-time in that external Universe… the study of this pattern, ‘function’ of ‘5 åctions’, ‘reality’ as a dynamic whole, infinity of ∑æ,e,ï,œ,û vowel languages…

There are so many ways to express it as varieties of real isomorphs in the Universe.

Tƒ be made of Vital Space, Se and time Cycles, Tƒ, as to create a feed back polar equation between 2 systems, Se<=>Tƒ, which exchange energy and information with the external Universe, Sp x Tƒ ≡ ST±4…

Existence becomes in this manner a function, a world cycle across a Universe of an entity that performs åctions in space-time of cyclical nature, and it is itself made of a myriad of inner motions of space-time, as a ‘particle≈knot of time cycles’.

Such knots of time cycles, Œ, are rotary maximal volumes in minimal space of logic crossings, between those time arrows that appear as a modular ‘I’, which fluctuates in its apparently moving, but rather fixed from an Tƒ∆+1 points of existence, knotting the will of its æ,e,ï,œ,û cycles

We all feel free as points of existence, but are just knots tied to the cycles of space-time we acct in the external world.

one and first isomorphism of all beings is that they exist and their existence is perceived as systems of energy and information, placed in a larger reality we call space and time. So in this section we shall deal with the relationship of the 4 elements and the properties of ‘existence’, a very wide theme which scientists completely escape given the limits of their models of reality (reduced to a single artefact of space-times, the Cartesian plane, and a single language, mathematics of continuous space). We have though a much wider perception of it all, difficult to transfer I know to other people. But that is the purpose of this web. ‘Translator is traitor’, still we will try to give you a vision of that much more complex reality, starting for the simplest concepts.

Symbols for Internal Time x Space and its åctions of existence vs. External Time/Space and its motions.

We use for internal, finite, ‘fractal’ space and time (in as much as its sum gives us the absolute space and time), two composite symbols:

Sp or Se, for finite, fractal quanta of space with lineal speed.

for internal time cycles.

And so we can affirm that internally all systems of the Universe experience time cycles, and repeat cyclical åctions, thanks to its lineal, vital space, its fields and limbs of energy that put together create its internal space-time, which is fundamental to their existence, even if it is not described by the absolute external space-time of Cartesian, Newtonian physics.

This lack of a proper understanding of finite internal space-motions and time cycles, in the context of the wider external world-Universe of absolute space-time has deeply broken the unity of science and the understanding of the ‘whys’ and ‘existential processes of creation and destruction of finite vital space-times. So we understand in depth the background space-time of the Universe (first through the studies of Galilean Relativity, then through Einstein’s relativity metric), but we have yet to define clearly what is the ultimate substance of beings made of internal space-time, as we no longer use those terms to analyze the ‘rotational vortices of time’ called masses or charges, the spatial motions of speed, the lineal and cyclical momentum, the circadian or logic time cycles, the limbs, and fields, that is the different varieties of relational space-time, which put together create the ‘physical and biological systems’ of the Universe.

So the Earth is a cyclical space-time created by the rotation of its mass; you are a series of circadian time cycles and åctions that create your vital space-time. It is that internal space-time, of which we are all made, what physicists with its external description of motions of space and infinite lineal time have forgotten.

Physicists thus created a short of Universal ‘abstract coordinates’, the Absolute External Space-time where scientists plot the internal cyclical åctions of species, which live through those inner time cycles that trace in their cyclical motion and occupy a vital space/time – the essence of a being.

Thus the inner ‘being’, its cyclical time åctions and its vital space, which move in cyclical patterns is ignored and studied only externally.

And time is described as if it were always an outer infinite time plotted over an external infinite spatial frame of reference.

When in reality there are infinite beings of finite internal time cycles and finite vital spaces. This more accurate description of reality is called a model of ‘relational, fractal space-time’, of which we are all made.

Internal, vital spacetimes cycles are conceptually and quantitatively more complex than external space-time, in as much as there are an infinite number of varieties of internal vital spaces and time cycles, and that is the reason we will need many more similar symbols to define those varieties.

And that is also the reason why models of internal space-time have failed to become standard science. A complex machine is more difficult to describe and more fragile, with all its internal parts than a simple lineal, continuous sword. But we cannot give up on the understanding of complex, internal vital spaces and time cycles. We just need to systematize them and organize their varieties with simple mathematical and logic rules. We have observed a fundamental rule, hidden by the ‘simplification of time clocks into lines’:

The inverse geometric properties of lineal space motions vs. cyclical time clocks, which divided all forms of the Universe in Open Lines, Closed clock cycles and in its infinite curved combinations. And this is the fundamental element to classify ‘space quanta’ and ‘time cycles’, the 2 formal motions of the fractal space-time Universe. So from computers able to define all what exists with O and |, to geometry which can obtain all curves, called conics from a cone, which is a cycle moving along a line, to conservation principles of cyclical and lineal momentum, kinetic and potential energy, from ‘one’, the whole absolute Spacetime Universe, we could say it is born an explosion of infinite lineal and cyclical motions of space and time.

And then we shall see, this ‘geometric inversion’, becomes a general feature of all the different varieties and properties of lineal space vs. cyclical time, which are inverse. So time cycles are inward motions, which become ‘physical vortices’, charges and masses that last in time act as the ordered clocks of time of nature that store the information of reality; and space motions become outwards, expansive, explosive motions that create space, in fast big-bangs and entropic, disordered motions.

But, and this is the beauty of it all, lineal and cyclical motions constantly combine its properties and forms, and motions into complementary beings of space-time. And that dynamic combination of two inverse beings, from lineal male bodies expert in fast expansive, big spatial, energetic motions, and cyclical female bodies, smaller with more form and expert in reproduction of information, to physical systems made of energetic waves and informative particles is the essence of all the existential systems of the Universe.

So as we define absolute spacetime as ST, we define the systems made of complementary fractal, internal space-times with a combination of those symbols:

(a system dominant in Temporal cycles, Tƒ), Se (a system dominant in Lineal spatial energy);

Se x Tƒ = K, Constant… as both systems together form a constant space-time.

s x t =ST (iteration), as the combination of energetic space and temporal information causes the ‘space-time åctions’ and reproduce the waves and systems of reality.

ExI=ST, which is the acronym for the function of ‘existence’, that is the combination of internal and eternal space-time whose interaction defines the existence of all beings.

/ x O : Ø, which is a geometric description of those combinations.

As we learn in depth the duality of space and time in the Universe all those more profound varieties, combinations and properties of space and time will start to dress with meaning our analysis. In that regard, internal space-time is more an ‘Aristotelian, qualitative’ analysis than a ‘Platonic, Mathematical analysis’ of reality.

But the beauty of ‘relational, scalar space-time’, and General Systems theory, the mathematical, logical model and Philosophy of Science developed in this web, is that both, the qualitative and quantitative, the Aristotelian and Platonic, the Vital and Abstract elements of reality are studied together.

And so we write:

∑ Se (internal Space with Speed and energy) x ∑ Tƒ (cycles of internal Time with information) = ST (internal present, iterative time cycles) ≈  ST (absolute external Time).

As it happens this equation that relates internal and external time, can be written in a simplified ‘acronym’ as ∑ Sp x Tƒ = ST, whereas we call the internal Space with energetic, lineal motion and its organs (fields, limbs), Sp , and the internal Time cycles and its organs (particles, heads) which carry the information of the system in the form and frequency of those cycles, Tƒ.

This simplified ‘version’ of the equation of internal and external space-time can then be ’read’ as the acronym of the essential function that all systems perform: It Exist.

Thus we call the function of all the systems made of internal space-time that perform åctions in a larger external space-time, the function of existences.

We shall use the symbol œ, Œ for the Function of Existence, a composite of the time cycles, Tƒ, and Spatial Energy, Sp, which put together create the systems of the Universe, or in geometric terms, of the O-cycles and – _- spatial, lineal motions, which put together create the systems of the Universe. Ultimately I chose the symbol because it is available on all qwert keyboards and rarely used in science. It will also be the symbol of the mathematical Unit of Relational, Fractal, internal, vital space-time cycles, the ‘fractal, non-Euclidean point’, which ultimately is what we are all in mathematical terms, ‘a point of space-time’ with inner parts, fractal parts, which becomes larger the closer we come to the point.

This function of existences, of beings made of internal space-time that move externally, tracing åctions and cycles in a wider ‘world’ of external space-time, is likely the most important equation of the Universe, as it puts together the 2 great fields of analysis of space and time, the inner, changing cycles of life beings and systems made of relational space-time and the outer motions and åctions of those beings in a relative absolute space-time, we call ‘its world’ or ‘Universal Plane’ (W or U or ST).

Thus the function of existences shall show how the interaction of internal and external space-time defines the EXI=ST-ENCE of all beings, each one a variety of ‘fractal, relational space-time’, a variety of the function of existences.

On  the function of present existence,  Max. exi (s≈t), and how it creates systems through actions that combine yang-energy-motion and yin-information into balanced maximal standing points of a world cycle, where the system will try to maintain itself by sharing advantageously entropy and form with the external world, trying to iterate its information, making it survive.

The universe indeed conserves information as a fractal constantly reproducing ‘island-universes’,fractal space-time beings whose structure simplified mentally into the concept of a generator equation with 3 topological motional Spe < St>Tiƒ, self-centred in a point of max. information or TIƒ mind, spread over a field of entropy, which it transforms through space-time actions into a hyperbolic body-wave…

This being, the supœrganism (ab. œ) is the fundamental particle of the Universe, considered in time as a world cycle, in space as a simultaneous, co-existing supœrganism, extending in 3 ∆+1 scales of relative size and speed of cyclical informative clocks, in the 5th dimension.

We are made of actions of space and time, of energy and information, ExI in relativity, Ex T in quantum physics  Se x Ti = K, in the metric of the 5th dimension. This much we know since Planck, though few philosophers if any has explored in depth what it means to us.



‘The universe is made of actions of energy and time, h=E X T’  Planck, on the function of existence of physical beings.

One of the simplest equation of existence, ExIt (hst-3) is the equation of the constant of planck, the ‘space≈time’ constant.

‘To act or not to act. That is the question. Wether is… the mind to suffer… the arrows of… fortune, Or… by opposing to end them: to die.‘ Hamlet, Shakespeare

‘I don’t have enough energy of time for all this’ Naked, Leigh

Humans act with energy and time, and so while its function of existence is more complex than the one of quantum systems (exi|h:st-3), certainly is of the same ‘quality’, a function of temporal energy.

“As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence” Charles Darwin

On the opposition between the being and the hostile world that surround it: To be is to exist, to exist is to move through the space-time symmetries and ∆-scales of the Universe absorbing energy and information for your system, ±∆e,i, reproducing both, exi, and coming together with similar beings. Yet in a fractal Universe ‘closed’, there is always a struggle to obtain that  ∆e,i, from other beings. And this causes uncertainty in each encounter, opposition and final death when someone else absorbs your exi.

‘To be is to be related.’ The world of the Non-A beings. A.E. Vogt.

‘Love each other’ Jesus, The law of eusocial evolution and ‘long term future’.

On the networks of existence and the best strategy of all being: to ally with similar forms through eusocial evolution and love≈sharing of energy and information.

By the number of ‘quotes’ on the function of existence that opens this post, the reader should realise of the importance of this post, which embeds in the function of existence the will of the Universe and all its parts.

Indeed, we have come to the fundamental algebraic expression of the generator equation, the ‘function of existence’ – again a logic, algebraic expression, which encodes the verbal, topological and analytical meaning of any super organism and its 3 parts, extended across the 3 scales of the super organism.

  • Tiƒo ∆+1: the cyclical particle-head-upper class in control of the linguistic algorithm, also residence of the mind of the system, which is a network, fully connected, ∏, hence with a complex dual structure, in which the upper ‘whole’ or mind (∆0+1) connects to all its individual axon cells forming a solid network that is displaced into the future, a quantum of time, ahead on the direction of motion, guiding the…
  • exi: body-wave of information and energy, which feeds on
  • s=t (-1), a relative field of entropy and information, which carries the ‘temporal energy’ to start the evolution of the system and/or replenish the motion and form, energy and curvature, loss in the game of existence:


In the graph, the absolute arrow of future in the Universe is social evolution from parts into wholes. Thus space-time ∆ust r=evolves into social networks, through the common search for similar energy and information, starting a process of ‘existence’, in time and space that will derive in the final creation of a social super organism.

This post was initially called ‘To<exi=st’, and also ‘function of exi=stence’, which resumes in a simple equation: Max exi (s=t). Indeed, all Nature’s systems of space-time have a ternary structure: Spe (limbs-fields of entropy) > St (wave-bodies of energy & in/form/ation) > Tiƒ (heads-particles of higher dimensional form) and as such they must engage in exchanges of motion≈entropy≈Spe, cyclical logic forms≈Tiƒ, and its body-wave combinations (energy and information), to renew the entropy of its limbs/fields, the energy of its wave-bodies, and the in-form-ation of its heads-particles; if they want to survive. 

To<exi(s=t), define therefore in a conceptual wor(l)d, the 3 parts of the being, its cyclical temporal head of maximal form, To, which absorbs energy < from a body exi, which absorbs entropy from a field, st.

So automatically by the mere fact that systems that absorbs energy and information for its bodies and heads, waves and particles, survive, ALL systems of nature perform cyclical actions of absorption and emission of energy and information.

The will of all super organisms: maximise your existence: Max. ∑Exi (s=t) 

The function though is MORE than a mere acronym of the generator equation, since we can indeed consider that all systems follow a simple mandate of survival: to maximise its function of existence, which written in a more proper way expresses the actions of space-time of all beings:

Will of survival Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)

This apparently simple equation is at the heart of reality. As all systems made of 3 parts, will constantly emit and absorb energy and information, ±∆e, i, through its body-heads, wave-particles in order to survive, and will try to reproduce both (Exi) through those body-waves, which is a function, maximised when e=i (9×1<8×2-7×3).

So systems will have a balance between its energy and information networks, (mens sana in corpore sanum), and will constantly strive to replenish its energy and information, extracted from a lower field, made of smaller parts, which will also be in balance (S=t), between its components of entropy and curvature-form.

Further on, they will try to evolve socially, ∑, to maximise the survival and size in space and synchornicity in time of the system.

So for every system we shall find a similar equation which will explain the actions of the being, explained quantitatively for physical systems (and a fascinating adventure of the mind is to express physical quantum equations in terms of the function of existence and the actions of space-time of all beings, so for example the 4 quantum numbers as the 4 letters of genetics, express mainly one of those 4 fundamental actions (energy feeding and locomotion, 1st number, gauging of information, 2nd number, reproduction, spin number, and social evolution, magnetic number)

While in life beings, the equation resumes the 4 drives of existence (feeding, informing, reproducing evolving socially), which therefore are common to all survival beings. And also the top predator function of a system (max. ∑e xi, will be a top predator in all contacts, in physical systems akin to the maximal momentum, which wins the collisions between physical systems).

And so we can consider all systems ‘knots of cyclical actions of exchange of energy and information’, the primary drives of life that apply also to physical systems (where those exchanges are regulated by the main quantum numbers).

But the most evolved ‘dust of space-time’, also reproduces and evolves socially into larger wholes and scales of the 5th dimension, creating social networks and super organisms which are wholes stronger than individuals. So we can consider that the evolution of superorganisms and its world cycles, maximise the function of survival and existence of all systems of Nature, and have also become the ‘rule’ followed by all of them, including physical systems which evolve particles into atoms, molecules, matter states and cosmological bodies. 

So dust of space time r=evolves and evolves in cyclical patterns and frequency actions of survival, which are discontinuous as the system constantly ‘switches’ between survival tasks, alternately feeding on energy, spending it in locomotions, reproducing its systems and evolving socially with clone systems.

All this fascinating bio-logical and topological reality is what we study in this post and all posts related to the function  exi=stence, its cyclical actions and its space-time knots (organic systems that perform those cycles in time).

It is an enormous discipline in its own, as most equations of sciences can be derived from the Max. Exi (s=t) function. And if not of the different ‘derivative and integral functions’ of its individual actions of motion, feeding, perception and reproduction->social evolution.

We thus talk of a function of existence, whose study is the fundamental purpose of Universal algebra, as the sum of all the space-time actions of the Universe, integrated along time gives us a world cycle of existence of a supeorganism, which emerges as a whole knot or sum of those space-time actions, experiences 3 ages and then explodes back and dies:

∫Å:∫(±∆e,i, exi) ∂e∂i: Life arrow of Universal super organism} + [-∆i +∆e: moment of death] = 0 sum

The 5th Dimension: Space- Time Actions.

Scientists often forget the 5th dimension of time, the cycles of existence and extinction from past to future that bio-logically trace reality.

Of what is that flow made? The answer is obvious for a philosopher: of functions of existence, time cycles from birth to death of infinite beings, which have in common to be born, develop, exist and die.

This, we call in General Systems sciences, the 5th and 6th dimensions of the Universe, the past and the future.

And if we consider each being of the Universe a knot of space-time actions, searching and exchanging energy and information with other knots, we can consider that they by performing those actions are all together webbing the future, creating it, forming, in/form/ing the networks and paths and patterns and cycles, exi, e<=>i, flows of exchanges of energy and information, infinite of them: ∑e<=>I, and that is what we call the Generator of Existence, the sum of all those infinite flows and cycles that web reality. If you consider that space has 3 dimensions; that Einstein studied the 4th dimension of ‘present time’); then we talk of the past and the future and its logical, ‘bio-logical’, action-based cyclical flows as the 5th and 6th dimensions of time.

In General Relativity Einstein achieved an exact measure of ‘simultaneous’ moments of time. This present, ‘spatialization of time, comes from Galileo, who described it, ∂t=∂S/v, as a derivative function, a tangential point of a much larger flow of time.

Thus relativity and physicists in general, study NOT change of form, of in/form/ation, of morphology in time – the realm of biology with whom systems sciences connects, but they study the minimal possible change in time, that of motion, translation in simultaneous moments, using derivatives and hence ‘instantaneous moments’ that allow measure. Einstein’s concern as that of physicists was therefore ‘present’ time, not the flows from past to future and its logic causality as general systems science are.

In terms of history of thought, General Systems and the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions of time is to XXI century time theory what General Relativity was to XX century time theory or evolution to XIX century, Leibniz  in the XVIII and Galileo in the XVII, the ‘cyclical’ step of the human-kind, which seems to have a centennial frequency in deep advances on the understanding of the ultimate parameters of reality, space and time.  (1)

And science consists mostly in predicting the future of certain species existential cycles observing the patterns and frequencies of repetition of previous cycles.

The scales of ‘—motions’ and information, in decametric, or dual scales.

Wholes have the capacity to kill smaller wholes, but at certain degree of smallness the whole becomes in fact a potential prey. Parts, bacteria that kill wholes, thus can also disaggregate wholes. The predator prey relationship is thus ore complex than it appears. But in any case ever herd ∑Sp, regardless of its inner ∏Tƒ form is perceived as ‘—motions’ for a higher whole, ∏∆+1, which will try to explode the ∑ herds and feed on ∆-1 forms, laving behind the ∑ head. He state in which one finds at each moment of the existential game, prey in a herd, knot of higher thought reproducer, creator, all those functions as complex as we might feel them are finally mere åctions of the equation of existence, and that sets the existential algebra as the mathematics of the function of existence.

Which itself is the generator equation of complementary systems of ‘—motions’ and information eh fundamental particle of reality made of an Se x Tƒ sections body-head, particle-fields that preys in a herds of micro points ∑Sp∆-1 and so we establish a hierarchical class structure of future, present and past also as the future takes advantage of the present and the past is the neuronal caste of information while the present is the middle class which busy busy reproduces and produces the ‘—motions’ of ∑Sp∆-1.

This is the key to understand in terms of social classes past, the lower caste, present the reproducer, repeater caste and future the informative caste. For example in human scales, male which are mind dominant, with lineal bodies and woman which are productive body dominant, with an ‘—motions’ head, you can establish future, upper caste of males a reproductive caste of women, and then the ∑ of ∆-1 natural animals seen as a lower caster of information and hence treated as pure ‘—motions’ by the human ‘family’ complementary couple, man-woman.

The expression in which the simultaneous equation of past=‘—motions’, present=reproduction future=Information manifests itself. Are multiple.

‘—motions’ (past, ecosystem) > Present (reproductive body) >Future, (Informative mind)…

It is the simplest and most common point of view, a fractal future zero point of maximal information guides a middle class of reproductive capacities, and higher matter brains, that keep the join relationship between ‘—motions’ and information alive: Sp X Tƒ =K, S=T+K, K, Sp, O, Sp, K, I


The Universe is made of 2 substances: spatial Entropy and informative time. We can see it with motion as Entropy and time or as fixed forms, as space and information.

We can see it as a single reality, as space and time, or as a multiple quanta, as Entropy and information. We can differentiate them by form, as space and Entropy are lineal or planar surfaces and time and information are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, s x t=k.

This duality structures all beings of reality. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal bodies. Weapons are lines that release Entropy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.                

The formal duality:  Se, Lineal, energetic space vs. Cyclical Informative, time: Tƒ. 

Tƒ start this review of different space and time concepts and developments, we must therefore consider first the 3 fundamental inversions/symmetries of space and time:

The form vs. motion inversion of physics and the mind.

The O-time clocks of information vs. _ lineal distances and motions of space, (information vs. energy inversion), proper of biology, mathematics and eastern philosophies and civilizations.

And the hierarchical, height, time past to future arrow of creation of wholes, its networks and its parts, vs. the democratic, social, herd-like planes of existence, or | vs. _ inversion of the 5th dimension, which being the more complex will deserve an entire section to deal with.

Let us then consider the geometric inversion in more detail.

We have kept for the end the analysis of the ‘alternative’, philosophical vision of time and space in Eastern philosophies, which were the first ‘philosophies of science’ that observed the wider Universe.

So there is a different ‘naming’ for the 2 dualities which structure the Universe, and I have used in most of my studies, so the reader will observe it often in the blog:

The comparison between 2 different formal motions, lineal motions and dimensions (Euclidean space) and cyclical motions and forms (time clocks). 

We shall prefer this duality, which combines both space and time parameters of form and motion, since in the Universe as Minkowski rightly affirmed ‘space and time are in the darkness, only their space-time combinations shine.’ Or in terms of eastern taoist- buddhist philosophies that came closer to its understanding, ‘every yin has a drop of yang, every yang has a drop of yin’.

So while it is important to clarify the different concepts of present-spatial forms and time motions, to fully grasp the errors and virtues of mathematical physics and the logic conceptualization of space and time, for practical reasons, it is more interesting to study 2 ‘combined concepts’, which we shall term conceptually as ‘energy’ and ‘information’ (in mathematical physics those 2 concepts have strict mathematical definitions, but as we have seen concepts of logic nature do matter; so we shall use the verbal concepts, unless we are specifically dealing with phenomena studied by mathematical physics).

They are based in the duality of lineal vs. cyclical motion/form, where we aggregate here from a geometrical perspective our 2 x 2 dualities geometrically, since this is a more telling perspective on the structure of the Universe. Thus through the history of thought there is this duality NOT expressed in terms of time and space but with similar concepts. For example, Descartes said all what existed was made of res extensa (the equivalent to Euclidean space) and vortices (the equivalent of time clocks).

So we shall in this version consider 4 elements:

  • |-Se, or lineal space distances/motions, which occupy maximal space. We shall call this spatial lineal form with a bit of motion, ‘Spatial energy’, or |-Se. It will be the fundamental concept applied to all systems to define the ‘lineal dimensions and motions of space’, the lineal momentum, the limbs and fields, which occupy maximal space with minimal volume, displace further in space, move faster and expand space.
  • Tƒ, cyclical time clocks/forms, which occupy minimal space, last maximal time, and have repetitive, logic properties. We shall call this Tƒ factor, Temporal information as it carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. Thus again we related through the dominant geometrical duality of lines vs. cycles, temporal cycles or clocks with its still state, of information.

In the next graph slightly different from the equivalent one, we see this ‘different naming’ that stresses the duality between lines and forms. Now, at both extremes we have the pure ‘|-space’ distances, and the pure, O-time clocks.

But in the middle we have ‘energy’, which is the concept of lineal motion (kinetic energy, lineal momentum) and ‘information’ (which is the concept of cyclical form, with more dimensions than the line).

We must stress those are ‘concepts of verbal logic thought’, not the mathematical definition of energy and information, which is restricted to mathematical physics, but the usual way humans understand those 2 terms.

As people understands ‘energy’ as motion, and when talking of motion they talk of lineal motion, not of rotary motion, which is not common among humans. So people say ‘I don’t have enough energy to do this’, meaning he doesn’t have enough capacity to ‘move’ himself and move other things. And when people talk of information, they refer to form, to knowledge, to bits of formal shapes made of ‘circular dots’ put together into complex forms, which he perceives and ultimately are a sum of ‘infinitesimal time cycles’ that stay in the point. So we rewrite in those terms the function of existence:

Œ.         Se<=>Tƒ

And affirm that the Universe is a system made of ‘temporal energy’, of spatial energy and ‘temporal information’ of ‘yang’ and ‘yin’, whose combinations give birth to the infinite beings of reality. And consider those 4 elements.

|-S, pure space, or lineal dimensions.

Se-spatial entropy, forms with lineal momentum, kinetic energy or spatial energy

O, form, information. static circles which are often the memorial tails of:

, Clock-like time cycles with repetitive patterns, or ‘pure time’.

Now, to further clarify which concept we talk of we shall capitalize and put first for each combination, the dominant element, and often place the | and O symbols or its Ø-wave body combination to stress what element dominates. I.e. O-Time is a clock with motion, |-Space is a lineal dimension, O-Space is a form of information, which stresses the passive form; Tƒ, is also a form of information, which stresses the active role of that information. I know all this sounds confusing, but a true mirror of the Universe should be accustomed to manage those paradoxical essential events of reality.

I imagine the reader schooled on mathematical physics would like definitive definitions, according to the Aristotelian, lineal logic that implies A->B, and by reductio ad absurdum, A≠B. But the Universe is dialectic, A<=>B, A and B constantly mix into combined forms, <=> which is what exist in present: space-time bidimensional formal motions. So we shall use also this ‘other variety’ that defines two pure limits of dimensional, lineal space, and moving time cycles, and two intermediate concepts of entropy or energy (lineal space with motion) and information (time cycles frozen into a past form).

Of course in physics energy is an overall concept that includes it all. But for that reason is of little use beyond the obvious fact that all is all and all is conserved. So they add kinetic energy (which is the concept equivalent to our spatial energy) and Potential energy (which is more akin to a form with a fixed position, hence closer to information). Mathematical physics and its concept of energy is a unfortunate concept like that of God, which encloses it all. It has though given enormous fruits because of this distinction, which properly ‘called’ should be Kinetic Energy or ‘energy’ and ‘Stored Information’ or Potential energy. Then we could fully grasp the duality and principle of conservation of energy and information to define the function of existence of relational space-time beings:

Œ.  ‘All what exists is a complementary system of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information that trans-forms each other ad eternal: Se<=>Tƒ ≈  Sp X I=ST±4’

Now we can consider the first formulation, the dynamic ‘temporal one’, Se<=>Tƒ, whereas Se would be the arrow of entropic, lineal time, Tƒ, the arrow of future, informative cyclical time, and the middle <=> the wave body of present space-time.

And the second formulation the spatial, static formal one, where Sp will be the limbs/fields of lineal space, i, the informative head, and its combination, X, an organism tied up by bodies-waves, which create a ‘diffeomorphic’, relational space-time being, ST extended across several planes of the 5th dimension.

Again, it is not possible to encase the dynamic ever changing reality of space form that becomes time motions, of lines that become cycles, through intermediate waves-bodies in strict ‘fixed’ conceptual terms. This is an error of the mind that ‘fixes’ motions and dynamic processes into simplified static mappings, which seem ‘focused’ and more truth. So first we had fixed geometry and now we have moving topologies, and so on. The reader should make thus a bending of his mind to fully grasp the paradoxical, more complex, fractal structure of the dynamic universe, where form is just the mind’s perception of a given motion. So today mathematics can find for every dynamic equation a topological, formal demonstration based in that duality.

In that regard, the concepts of ‘lineal, spatial energy’ and ‘temporal clocks of information’ is more useful when studying the complementary ‘yin-yang’ species of the Universe; and the reader should understand both conceptualizations, to reveal the hidden structures of nature:

So I often choose to study as the centerpiece of the analysis of the Universe, the geometric duality between cycles≈circles vs. lines≈speeds, in the ‘philosophical fashion’ of Eastern cultures, which understand the Universe an opposition between:

  • Cyclical motions/forms (yin-Vishnu duality), which I called ‘O-Time’, and
  • Lineal motions/forms (yang-Shiva), which I called |-space.

Since a line and its lineal motion and a cycle and its circular forms are two states of the same thing, the opposition between lineal dimensions/motions of space vs. cyclical clocks/motions of time is more telling of the paradoxical properties of the Universe.

Thus i call in those different ways the dualities of stop vs. go, form vs. motion, O vs. |, TIME VS. SPACE. Tƒ vs. Se.

And treat O-forms and Time cycles as clocks of time, Tƒ, in present dynamic form and past memorial information.

And lineal, space dimensions and its |-speeds, as |-Space, Se, as relative past, entropic, energetic motions and forms.

So when you read, O-Time we mean both cycles and circles (clocks and informations) and when I write |-space we mean both speeds and lines (energies and lengths).

Since O-Time vs. |-space is a better ‘mind construction’ to describe the underlying form vs.motion, | vs. O beats of existence than the human classic, western concept of space as form and time as motion.

Yet the western mind defined unlike the eastern mind in Aristotelian terms time and space NOT as geometric dualities but as the duality between motion=time and form=space.

And since this culture is today global and the purpose of this web is to standardize 20 years of independent research on relational space-time for ‘human readers’, I will try in the future to stick to the ‘canonical’ concept and write | and O motions as time and | and O forms as present space.

The reader should though understand both approaches the western time=motion, space=form and the eastern, time=yin=cycles of information and space=yang=lineal forms/motions.

In the graph we describe all species of reality as made of this ‘geometrical duality, where ‘Energetic space describes lineal space with motion, and Tƒ, Time cycles means both the cycle, and its informative combinations.

Whereas time cycles dominates and encircles the vital space – a fact which in mathematical physics defines the operations of Integration of a volume of space, restricted to the ‘boundary conditions’ of the time cycle/sphere. showing again the intimate relationship between ‘logic mathematics’ and iTS (invariant, isomorphic timespace theory).

This geometric duality defines then two perfect forms of |-space and O-Time, which fluctuate between the state-present still and past to future to past relative flows of energy (from bigger scales into lower scales) and information (from lower ‘genetic’ scales to larger ones).


  • |-Se (lineal space/speed) vs. O-Tƒ (cyclical clocks of information) and.
  • Past (entropic motions) < Space (still repetitive present) > Future (logic time clocks that create the future)

Again the reader should understand that the Universe is ‘interpreted’ in different ways according to species and languages, but ultimately what matters is not the ‘human conceptualization of it’, but the dualities, O-|, past and future, and its present combinations that surface in ‘present’.

In that regard all systems of Nature including human beings, are made of formal spaces and time cycles that enclose them, and only pegging them all together, we can talk of an absolute abstract space, S, as the sum of all those ‘fractal spaces’, ø-Se, which are (perceived in motion), quanta of energy, the time function of space.

Sp                   |-Se (speed-motion: kinetic energy)  x Tƒ (mass/charge).

On the other hand each vital time motion, which encircles the Space system. has its own clock cycles that measure its motions and rotations, and only equalizing all time clocks and cycles, with the human ‘thought-heart-eye’ beat of a second, we could talk of a single Human Time scale for the whole Universe…

Yet, if we put all those spaces together and refer all those time clocks to a single time scale, we can measure better reality from the human perspective, which is what practical science needs to build and operate its machines and set up its systems of collective time measure. And for that reason, from the XIX c. onwards – when clocks were synchronized to match the timetables of railroads – we use a single time clock.

What relational space-time does, is to return to the original ‘fact-event’, the time cycle, consider it the unit of the Universe and study a reality of infinite such cycles, resolving with this new realism most of the conundrums and questions of different sciences.

So now we can study some of those elements and symbols, which define the fundamental concepts of relational space-time, starting from the analysis of time as motion and its 3 types of motions, the entropic, expansive past, the present, iterative formal space and the future, informative cyclical form, and the sequential equations of the life-death cycle defined by them.

Actions and the 5th dimension.

The previous graph, written with the formal symbols of ® shows a few systems of different scales of reality performing from left to right those 5 actions, as they move and feed on Spatial Energy, reproduce, perceive information, an evolve socially.

And the result of all those combined åctions is the arrow of absolute future of the 5th dimension, the arrow of social evolution, (û), which grows in social scales, from parts into wholes, as parts are needed first for wholes to become in the future:

In terms of the different planes of the fifth dimension, most actions take place between planes of existence, even if their outcome is perceived in a single plane, as systems, self-centered in an ∆o plane, probe downwards and upwards in the scales of the 5th dimension in search of:

– Its pixels of in-form-ation (i≈∆-3 bits), boosts of motion (a≈∆-4 fields), and bites of energy (e≈∆-2); stored to provide those boosts of motion or iterate the system in the lower cellular scale (∆-1).

On the other direction upwards, the system will interact with its larger social organism and world performing its ‘slavish’ cycles of existence, as a relative arrow of the larger whole. The purpose of all those åctions is self-evident: to improve the survival chances of the system, introducing a biological will in all points of view.

The human program of actions.

Humans also obey the survival action program. They basically have just a larger ‘range’ of options to choose between information, energy and social behavior, but ultimately do the same that the smallest electron.

Indeed, when you eat you can choose more than a bite of light as electrons do, but you are still feeding on energy to boost your motions; when you love you are still on reproduction mood and when you gather with other humans on social evolutionary mood, creating new ‘Universals’, collective planes of existence, ‘mass-numbers’.

Yet human, anthropomorphic, subjective Uo points of view submitted to the ‘Mind’s paradox’, which rejects motion/living properties in all entities that are:

  1. A) removed from Uo (Max.∆) and…
  2. B) Static, as the mind stops most motions into form to fill in its reduced static space, implies that humans never had and probably never will recognize the Pantheist Universe of self-similar beings, which the existence of those åctions and codes prove.

Anthropomorphic understanding of the will of survival: Actions and languages that describe them.

Thus, as always when dealing with humans and any p.o.v. we distort the actions of other beings from our self-ish point of view denying them to other beings, or qualifying other systems as objects over which we perform our actions. This is shown in the 2 languages we use to describe actions.

Now when we analyze those actions in more detail, there are two elements which enter in relationship: the œ-point that performs the action and the system over which the action happens.

In terms of the ‘ternary Universal Grammar’ that describes all actions from a linguistic point of view, human verbal thought has ‘nailed’ the structure of those actions, far better than mathematics with a simple logic structure proper of all its sentences (Chomsky):

I (subject) < verb (actions) > Object (over which the Ei action is performed).

Physics on the other hand, as it is only concerned with the study of ‘locomotions’, reduces the concept extremely, reason why we shall not use it here. In that sense, in theoretical physics, an action is an abstract quantity that describes the overall motion of a physical system, and therefore it corresponds to the simplex of those 5 actions, a. We shall thus comment on physical actions and its most interesting perspectives (the Lagrangian of actions, the law of least time and the unit of quantum actions), when dealing with ‘locomotions’.

Ultimately what physicists do with their topic reductionism is to deny ‘physical systems’, the vital will proper of those actions. Mind the reader, for a physicist always the physicist is the only intelligent being, mathematics the only language of knowledge and everything an object. So the fact that electrons and quarks do reproduce when they absorb energy is NOT an action but a deocupling, the fact that magnetic fields organize huge social groups of atoms is NOT a social action, but a lattice, and so on.


Now actions are the core of the vital program of ‘existence’ vs. extinction of the Universe. They exist for beings to exist. Species who perform those actions survive, and continue the game. Those who don’t disappear. And so it is only a question of ‘time’ that only species that perform the 5 actions, æ, ï, œ, û, survive (we group the dual absorption and emission of spatial energy and temporal information, ±e and ±i, with dual letters, æ and ï, to couple them with the 2 complex actions of reproduction œ and û)

External and Internal symmetry between actions and parts: trinity.

Thus the 2 most important isomorphisms of the Universe are:

From an external p.o.v. the dual and ternary symmetries between spatial synchronous organic form and temporal motions.

From an internal œ-mind, with its will of existence, the 5 ‘ a, e, ï, œ, û’ survival åctions, which conform the program of the Universe.

Both isomorphisms are related as actions are the will of the being to ‘maintain’ in balanced and ‘fill up’, the 3 parts of all beings:

æ actions therefore belong to limbs-fields of spatial ‘energy’; a is the kinetic motion, e the storing of potential energy.

ï actions belong to the To-head/particle that process temporal information.

œ actions are reproductive actions of the ST-body wave, the present being that creates an offspring of equal beings.

And so the û-niversal actions beyond the being, are those of the 5th dimension when the being is part of the whole.

This other angle on the analysis of actions (a difficulty of T.Œ is to realize that unlike the one-dimensional human mind, the Universe does have many perspective on any reality; so we are here giving a few on the concept of survival actions), shows how actions and scales of the 5th dimension are connected, such as æ, ï actions relate the being to ∆-n lower scales where it feeds and perceives, œ to ∆-beings of its same scale and û to the ∆+n social scales.

The minimal actions: Duality

Now, we call simplex actions, the æ, ï actions because those are performed by all beings. Indeed, some beings do NOT reproduce, but all must at least as long as they exist emit and absorb spatial energy and temporal information, Sp<≈ > Tƒ.

All systems have spatial kinetic lineal motions and cyclical clocks of temporal information. All systems are made of motion and form. So all systems at least do emit or absorb motion and form, which we shall call despite the imprecision of the terms, generically spatial energy and temporal information, ± ∆ e, i.

Hence the use of the general synonymous concepts: Sp≈æ, Ti≈ï. ST≈Ei

This gives us the 4 simple åctions for the minimalist Sp≈Tƒ being:

  • -∆æ: motion and changes in accelerations by emission of kinetic energy
  • +∆e:ø kinetic energy absorption or feeding and entropic extinction
  • +∆ï: observer’s perception by absorption of information
  • -∆ï: emission of information to communicate.

Those are thus the 4 ±∆ e, i natural simplex åctions in space-time of any being. We could in this ‘qualitative’ less precise language, talk of entities that absorb and emit information with their particles/heads and energy for their bodies (that store it) and limbs (that spend it with kinetic motions).

And so in the perfect state of ‘present’, any system conserves ST, Ei, Present existence.

This present existence is one in which the balance of information and energy of the system remains in a dynamic constant process of absorption and emission of both, in balance with the environment, which allows the system to repeat its existential åctions and survive.

The limits of actions. Max./Min. Tƒ, Sp: The equations of death

Now the limits of actions by overdrive or lack of Spæ and T ïƒ are ‘death’: As we said actions are the will of existence, so lack of action is dead, or ‘frozen states of not-being’ (hibernation, coldness≈ slow down of time clocks, etc.)

So we write two equations of death by excess or lack of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information:

Min. Tf x Max. Spæ: Death by overdrive of energy – accident, young death, cubs feeding predators, big-bangs, wars etc.

Min. Spæ x Max. Tƒ: Death by overdrive of information – 3rd age, warping, mass attraction, coldness, freeze, etc.

Now of course, for each species, in physical systems, we must remember that the 3 different time clocks, frequency, temperature and speed define different forms of death. Systems can die in the ∆+1 gravitational scale by sheer pressure of mass. Systems can die in the temperature scale but frozen no motion. Systems can die in the ∆-1 scale by loss of frequency (gravitational red shift, and tiredness of light, Doppler death). The entire subject of death, when your clocks run too slow or too fast and your constant quanta of space, of vital energy are spent, or you get too fat eating them, is thus specific for each species, and one of the isomorphisms to study when applying the general equations of ST symmetries and ages to each species.

But in general åctions have limits imposed externally by the limits of the larger world in which the system exists, as they become ‘resonances’, synchronise and act on that world. So since the word is larger in Sp≈Tƒ parameters if the system does not watch out its internal balances it can die.

For example thermodynamic worlds, centred in the ∆-temperature scale and its species like humans are, cannot reach on their gravitational interactions in the outer world, speeds that go beyond c and temperatures below 0. So they will die.

In fact much before getting there. Since to fix the limits of Tƒ/Sp death we need to observe the limits of Time-space of the being which are always smaller than those of its word. So our temperature cannot go beyond ±310 K and our relative speed beyond 30 m/s, without risking a harmful accident.

This means that while åctions are ‘general’, isomorphic and can be described for all systems, detailed analysis of åctions will be specific of each species and its relative vital ‘constants, and the inverse parameters of density of energy and information of the system and the world it inhabits (Spe/Tƒ for the ∆-being and the ∆+1 world).

This post is obviously most focused on the general laws of those 5 åctions of existence, and the general bits of information and boosts of motion and bites of energy for entire families of species, belonging to ∆n planes of existence.

Such as the h-Planck bit of information for all electronic beings and its quantum rules, etc. So we shall only introduce this general elements here, reserving for 3-4 line posts detailed analysis.

∆¡>|2|: Physical systems

The study of the ‘action instructions’ or codes that make species perform those åctions, its periodicity and triggers (often defined externally by a volume of the e,i specific substance of the being) becomes then also an important part of this analysis.

For example, atomic systems perform third åctions by obeying the mathematical, Quantum codes of 4 numbers; Biological systems write their instructions in Genetic codes of 4 letters; instinctive behavior codes those åctions in 4 drives of life existence; the 4 dimensions of light space-time express those åctions in photons; 4 Maxwell equations develop them for electromagnetic currents…

Examples of the 4 codes of åctions.n clocks

How do actions reflect in the scientific languages. In physical sciences scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 3 space-time symmetries, Spe<STœ>Tiƒ, which reflect the space-time cycles of species. Those cyclical space-time actions are thus defined by Equations, which translate the ¬Æ symmetries of space-time into the jargon of mathematical physics.

But the ternary symmetry has 3 elements. So we must write it on a dual form, of the type Spe x Tif = STœ, Past x Future = Conserved Present, to establish the homology between the Generator, which is a logic development, and the equations of physics which are dual.

Then, as the graph shows, we must obviously define for each physical scale, what is the Tiƒ parameter of time frequeuncy (frequency, in the quantum scale of waves, temperature in the thermodynamic scale and speed in the gravitational scale); what is the spatial ‘unit’ or constant step of each scale (h-planck, for the quantum electromagnetic scale, k-boltzmann in the thermodynamic scale and m in the gravitational scale); and finally translate the space-time conserved quantity for each ∆-constant system, which will be, Ei (energy and information, both measure with the mathematical concept of Energy), when considered the whole, or momentum, when considered a ‘step’ of a cyclical, closed ‘conserved energy path’.

So to define cyclical space-time actions in physics, we work normally with a general equation of the form: Tiƒ (ƒ, T, v motion parameter) x Spe (h, k, m space quanta) = Ei (Energy function) or p (momentum).

And finally we need to define the element that ‘acts’, and the world in which it ‘acts’ and the scale of the Universe from where it ‘extracts’ its bits of information, bites of energy, seeds of reproduction etc.

So we must consider the active fractal point, Å which will be either a particle, atom, or matter state, cosmic body or dark matter form (strangelet, black hole), and then describe with equations that will usually contain the motion-time parameter, the space-quanta parameter and the energy function.

Then we can define some basic equation of physics for each action of existence, and start the fascinating though long process of translating each equation of physics to the isomorphic action it represents for the point of view that is at the center of each action.

So functions that represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:

∆-3: Light åctions.

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons:image030

In the graph, we have written the 3 dimensions of time, past, slow energy and future, fast information with the human time-clock speed as our relative present, point of view. Since simpler scales are causally in the past; as an entity is created literally by informing, molding with higher ∆+1 networks, simpler scales ‘cell by cell’. When a light wave moves, it does not ‘displace’ but reproduces its wave motions, ‘warping’ simpler gravitational 1D string lines, by a height factor of –ct (Relativity). Motion is really reproduction of information on a simpler ∆-1 scale. Thus we describe the 3 Time Dimensions of ‘social evolution’ of light across 3 ∆-scales as:

– ∑: Color is the 4th ‘social dimension’ of light, made by herding together multiple frequencies of light into a photon, its present, simultaneous space dimension. As space from the perspective of time dimensions is a present ‘slice’ of the total time flow – the 4th dimension of time. While inversely the Present, simultaneous measures of Time, are in Relativity the 4th dimension of space. Yet we reach a sounder description separating those 3+3 spacetime dimensions, by using multiple time speeds instead of a single 4D clock.

+i: Fractal electrons are Light’s ∆+1 dimension of future network evolution.

-i: The gravitational ∆-1 scale in which it feeds is its relative, to which it returns after ‘dying’, red-shifting and expanding its length-speed between galaxies (z>c).

Then as light warps into more informative, smaller beings (Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp), first electrons, then molecular orbitals and so on, each new ‘scale’ of light space-time requires the previous scales to be born. Thus causally simpler scales are in the past. When your ∆-neurons, create your ∏-whole, they are in the past, requiring an action-bit of time to synchronize and emerge as an ∆+1 whole into the future. That’s why the subconscious rules, and the ‘ego’ merely observes with its electric whole brain waves; or the molecular orbital appears ‘after’ the atomic ones dissolve into the whole.

Further on, complex ∆+∆ systems move slower, as they draw more information in a single space-point. A light beam of pure ¥-space informs only a gravitational line so it reaches the maximal c-speed of our spacetime membrane. But there is another parallel Universe of gravitational scales, of Sp-speed and information-order, made of dark, gravitational energy, quark matter and quark, boson stars (black holes), which are accelerating vortices of w>C and T the c-event horizon. And since we ‘don’t see’ gravitational information, its relative motion-speed is ∞, non-local.

4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field or rather its structure as a system with an external membrane, the magnetic field, an internal point of view, the charge, and the exchanges of energy and information between both poles and the external world (the content of its actions).maxwells-equations4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons:qnumbers

Its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number.

In that regard, as in the case of energy we have to differentiate the concept of T.Œ’s actions and Action in physics.

Motion, in physics, may be described from at least two points of view: the close-up view and the panoramic view. The close-up view involves an instant-by-instant charting of the behaviour of an object. The panoramic view, on the other hand, reveals not only a complete picture of the actual behaviour of an object but also all the possible routes of development connecting an initial situation with a final situation. From the panoramic view, each route between the two situations is characterized by a specific numerical quantity called its action. Action may be thought of as twice the average kinetic energy of the system multiplied by the time interval between the initial and final position under study or, again, as the average momentum of the system multiplied by the length of the path between the initial and final positions.

The value of the action for any actual motion of a system between two configurations is always a minimum or a maximum. In most instances, the behaviour of the system follows the path of minimum, or least, action. In an optical system, such as a microscope, light travels along the path of least action as it undergoes bending in the lenses. For light, action is proportional to the time of travel, so that the light travels the path that takes the least time.

With the beginning of quantum theory (1900), the concept of action took on a new importance. In describing the behaviour of molecular or atomic particles, one had to invoke a previously unsuspected restriction. Only those states of motion are possible in which actions are whole-number multiples of a certain very small number, known as Planck’s constant, named for the German scientist Max Planck, who first proposed a discrete, or quantized, behaviour for objects of subatomic dimensions. Thus Planck’s constant is the natural unit, or quantum, of action. But in T.œ, h, is the quanta of space of the ∆-1 scale, and so it appears in the different vital, a,e,i,o,u actions of the entity. The mathematical concept of action in physics, e x i thus is of little use in t.œ’s description of actions, but of course h-planck as the minimal quanta of space or ‘Planckton’ is essential to Physical systems.

Type of actions across ∆-scale.

All this said the proper way to understand the function of existence, e x i |s=t, we need to understand some basic notions and type of actions, and to that aim we use a simple mnemonic rule, classifying them within the vowels of the alphabet, as a-ccelerations (pure entropic motions), e-nergy feedings, i-nformative actions, o-rganic reproduction (offspring) and finally U-niversals creation (creation of wholes from individual parts)

This fifth set of ‘actions’ is what all supœrganisms, automatically, consciously or through some other species, as enzymes of its reproduction, is what all beings do.

5 DIMENSIONAL DUST OF SPACE TIME, ‘DO EXIST’ by acting, exchanging energy and information along ∆º±1 scales.

∆º exi±st as a function of actions.

The Universe is a game of ‘Doers’, ∆º minds that do observe the Universe through its attached body of energy, a flow of time, ∆-1≤∆+1 and information ∆+1≥∆-1, balanced constantly on an inner and outer, ∆- and ∆+ world and Universe.

If we define the following motions of time:

Energy: ∆-1>∆º

Information: ∆+1>∆º

Entropy: Death into Space: ∆+1<<∆-1

Time Singularity; emerging seed: ∆-1<<∆+1

We define in that sense, the inner world, ∆º-i vs. the outer world ∆º+i as the essential first division of the existential function, which can then be mathematised as a cycle or membrane that closes an inner and outer world, and do exist by letting energy and information, e x i transit between its inner and outer world of existence.

This is the game, as existential functions we are a membrane with an angular momentum, given by its inner density and outer motion of the past-future related topologies of space – we are the membrane of an open ball, communicating with the Universe, were are pis, ∑ πis of existence; fluid ensembles of time cycles knotted into a crystal mind, a point of complexity only perceived in full from its still mind mirror of the Universe:


In the graph bosonic minds vs. spatial fermions, establish a first general evolution across ∆ (bosons) or ST, fermions, which therefore becomes an expanded polar flow, as OPPOSED TO HE HIERARCHICAL SINGLE ANTI-DEATH ARROW OF BEINGS IN A BOSONIC STATE WHICH TRY CONSTANTLY TO INCREASE ∆, not to die as a §ocial knøt.

IN THE GRAPH we observe the essential s±t function with two possible outcomes which will be defined by the interaction of those two arguments.

Abstract Regardless of the dogmas of modern science, which accepts only mathematics as the language of God (Galileo, Hilbert,etc), and gives anthropomorphic qualities (perception≈informative properties, life-vital-biological≈survival properties) only to human beings and the like, hiding those clear ‘ego-trips’ of human superiority with elaborated dogmas, easily believed (as the ego is above knowledge), from religion to science, reality objectively speaking makes us equal to all other beings, made of the same substances and behaviours, only different in quality not in quantity.

Thus the Universe and all its parts do have sentient=apperceptive, informative capacities, ruled by an ∆º point-mind or singularity of information, which controls with different languages a  body of energy and information, e x i , which exchanges energy and information with an external upper and lower, scale of space-time, ±St. So of the many ways we write the logic generator of space-time beings, one of my favourites is the ‘function of existence’:

∆º (mind- particle/head exchanging…) = e x i (energy and information with its body-wave over) ± st (an outer world and inner world of space-time in which the organism exists)

To exist, ∆º=exi±st, exi=st¡ence are similar acronyms we use often in this blog, even if the use of ‘words’ given the one-dimensional dogmatic way in which humans perceive reality won’t be easily accepted. But this blog does not follow the ‘paradigm of dogma, truth and measure’, which passes today as science, but the concept of a fractal, homologic, repetitive Universe, where given the simplicity of its fundamental principles, the beauty is in the homologic, metaphoric repetition of similar patterns in all beings. And of those patterns the most important is the ‘actions’ of survival that systems display to ‘exist’, that is the needed constant actions of exchange of energy and information, absorbtion of entropy-motion and emission of repetitive patterns of information, to make the system survive beyond death.

Those actions is the theme of this post – the program of existence, all systems follow in order to survive, which we resume in the previous acronym, and in a mnemonic 5 vowel system of action: entropy motions or ‘A-celerations’, e-nergy feeding, i-formative reproduction and communication, o-ffspring (reproduction) and  social evolution from individual into Universals. To exist, thus is to perceive and gauge information about energy sources where to feed or reproduce, and move towards those sources, often with similar close beings, in herds and social organisms, stronger than the individual.

The function or program of existence is thus a program of survival which unifies all systems, not only in its ternary forms in space, ages in time and scales of co-existence, but in the way they behave to continue that existence. What humans bring to the table as special is not perception, perhaps self-consciousness of being apperceptive species, due to the self-reflection of the verbal language. But as Leibniz put it, not all humans are truly conscious of being, neither things should be so unconscious of existence. So he coined the term apperception, which we often use here as the automatic, vegetative or reflective perception and gauging of information needed to survive that all systems perform.


4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule.

4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:


And 4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.

Now, the study of the ‘Program of Existence’ is an enormously extended field, and so we must consider for the reader not to loose its ‘mind’ (-; on such vast field, which encompasses all the åctions and events of the Universe, only a few generic elements in ∆ST, which are latter studied in detail for each species, as in the aforementioned cases of the 4 quantum numbers. 4 genetic letters, 4 biological drives and 4 Maxwell equations.

Thus, immediately the reader would realize that according to the duality between ‘the thoughts of God’ (∆ST) and its details (all the different sciences) 2 are the main sub-disciplines of this field of knowledge are:

– The study of the 4 drives of existence for each species of the Universe. This should be realized in each science, as an introductory course that embeds the science in ∆ST

– The study of the interåctions, synchronicities, order and relationship between the 4 drives and its generic laws for all systems. This second field is the purpose of this post.

Thus for all said, it is quite evident that along the study of the topologies in space and ages in time, the study of the åctions is the 3rd most important isomorphism of the universe.



What do 5D points  of space and time do? to exist as points with volume, with 3 organic parts: To, the cyclical sphere, mind-mapping which directs a body-wave that iterates the system along a path of a field of space-time by exchanging energy and information in favorable conditions for its system So beings can be described formally as:

To (heads-particles)< Exi(body wave) ≈ ST: space-time field/limbs that move the system.

And consider that they are a ‘function of existence’, whose purpose is To< Exi≈st, by performing a series of actions of exchange of energy and information, with its environment, with the aim of growing and multiplying, reproduce and evolve into new planes of space-time.

In the graph, we see the function of existence of man as a ternary organism of space-time.

How often a system implement the cyclical space-time actions it needs? Simply.

They are discontinuous, modular cycles, as actions absorb or emit energy and information when the system spends it. so actions have time rhythms, and the system varies between them. We eat, perceive, fuc* and socialise not simultaneously. So actions are the origin of the discontinuous ‘beats’ of existence. A fuc* a day for young married couple, a fuc• a year for an animal in spring – those are different beats. We eat all days, we see each second. The order, rhythms, synchronicities, interdependence, etc, of actions are thus another huge field studied in our post on synchronous actions.

Another element thus becomes the way in which a mind through memorial logic circuits, stored mathematically or genetically, or verbally (physical, biological social systems) or in any other language of the mind performs its actions; and the ‘triggers’ of the different parts of the being that start up an action rhythm (hunger: ∆e, lust: ∆œ, curiosity: ∆i, etc. in man).

In the graph, the human ∆ºst being composed of Space, Time, ∆-scales and ºminds that perceive the whole enact the will≈algorithm of survival, immanent and automatic (as those systems that did not impose this will of survival, and its 5 actions became extinct).


Above we have shown it integrated across the time duration of a human world cycle, below we develop it for a man, in terms of its, 3 ‘varieties’ of bidimensional space, the Se, digestive, energetic system, the Tƒ, cyclical, informative head and the TS iterative, time space blood/reproductive organs, and its evolution through the 3 ages of time, the Te, young, entropic age, the Tƒ adult iterative, reproductive age, and the Tƒ, old, informative age:


In terms of space it develops as Se, the lineal, entropic, expansive form, Si, the hyperbolic for and Tƒ, the spherical form.

Thus we have a simple code to explain it all, the æ,e,ï,œ,û system of space-time dimensions and events. The playful understanding of those simplest elements of reality through the manipulation of those symbol with the function of existence, its integrands in space and derives in time, is the ultimate game of reality that we can then apply to each species.



The 5 åctions in humans and other species.

1107 1112 1117c

In the graph the systems of humans to develop its actions, which are the senses, openings to the 3 digestive: energetic, blood: reproductive and brain: informative main systems (divided by the ternary principle in 3 more subsystems) that define the human being and its ‘energetic’, ‘informative’ and reproductive actions, below the social actions mediated by memes, most often of eusocial love religions, today translated into laws of equality, fraternity and solidarity. As we are also code by memetic and genetic systems of actions.

10 human scales

There is A 5D deeper understanding in philosophical terms on the manner in which form and motion transcends through scales to be perceived by the human being, and why we only perceive those scales – namely because they are the ones we act upon. So we can build a human being as the sum of all those åctions across all its scales we perceive, from where an entire understanding of the program of existence of man, our will and what is ‘life and existence’ for us can be deduced.

This connects with the order of those åctions as a pyramid of ‘desires’, we do have a Maslow-like pyramid of åctions which emerge and require the previous one: to perceive we must move towards the perceived system, to feed we must perceive the food and move to it, to reproduce we need enough energy and genetic information in our body. And obviously to evolve socially we must reproduce previously.

And since creation of social, organic networks, requires all other åctions, it is the summit of the ‘program’ of the ‘biological’ Universe that all its species follow.

In the graph that opens this  we see the concept of åctions applied to all systems. It is a decade old graph, when I omitted a-motions, the lowest action and included generations, an action above the ∆+1 scale, mixture of the reproductive and social actions.

Yet since now I consider ∆+1 generations, as part of Time Theory (evolution in ∆+1 planes), and have changed my consideration of ∆-4 accelerations as part of Space theory, we could exchange those åctions. i am not doing so much corrections for laziness and also to show the ‘continuity’ of the whole Universe.

The choice though comes from the philosophical considerations:

‘An action requires a conscious will by the individual 0-point of the system which performs it’.

In that regard, the choice is ambivalent, but motion seems to be more conscious than the passing of multiple generations, which beyond reproduction is not an individual action. Of course, ∆ST is a perfect structured Universal order created not by humans, but by Reality and my perception of it has improved with time. Still the graph is a nice portrait of what åctions are in multiple planes of existence, performed by many ∆-species.


Deduction of åctions from the metric of the 5th dimension and the existential force .

We can also consider åctions from the perspective of the ∆-metric, as  an ‘existential mandate, which all systems make explicit in his languages:

Grow and multiply:                     Max. [∑ Sp x Tƒ]∆±4 ->Sp≈Tƒ

It is obvious then that åctions of Energy and Information exchanges bring finally social wholes.

The equation expresses them all:Spatial Motion and Energy feeding are the Sp related åctions, Perception of form, Tƒ, and iteration through a language of genetic information, i, are the two åctions related to Tƒ and i. And finally Social evolution, Max. ∑, is the 5th action. Actions thus are born of the survival program of the existential force of a system and its organic structure.

We can in that sense consider primary, external; secondary, internal and complementary åctions.

All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions, which are MOTIONS WITH FORM, e x Tƒ events that combine the 2 elements of reality.

What are the types and purpose of those åctions?

If we depart from 2 motions, energy and information, expansive and implosive motions, we can combine try to obtain more of them in ONLY 5 Invariant åctions:

Sp åctions:

∆a: The simplest one motion, which accelerates, reaches a steady state and decelerates in its 3 ‘ages’  (external motion). But we could also can be considered to be internal motion, of generational ages (the one represented on the graph). What defines in that sense ‘motions’ is the limited capacity of the ‘∆-being’ to modify it.

– ∆e (feeding) on energy to create the structural pieces of the body/wave.

Tƒ Actions:

-∆ Tiƒ

– ∆œ: SxT: Reproductive Communication; SxT: creation of complementary systems, which sometimes we group together as ‘present’ reproductive åctions.

Energy feeding and reproduction are mixed åctions since they process both energy and form, so they are secondary åctions. Perception and motion are pure Sp an Tƒ åctions.

– Social Actions; ∆û.

There are different åctions in society according to which scale we relate and the languages we use.

there are 3 types of languages, ∏-temporal genetic, ∑-spatial and ⊕, organic social growth in the final stage of the S9=∆+1 creation of a Universal through Social scales.

∏Tƒ creation of genetic informative networks, in which all systems are connected, for simpler societies.

∑Sp: energy herding in the same scale over a extended spatial word…

⊕ Se Tƒ; the more complex societies, which  signifies the creation of networks and social classes, the informative upper, reproductive body and energetic classes, distinguished by its degree of connectedness.

Since in the upper class, each ‘neuron/particle’ communicates with all others, through its axons/bosons, forming a ‘whole’ new ∆+1 unit (hence the multiplicative symbol as axons are the square of its neurons).

On the other hand, the ∑-scale of reproductive individuals is only connected to their spatial neighbors (and their genetic families). Thus it is easier for the far more connected neuronal caste to control its body herds of loose cells/atoms with those ‘axons/cyclical waves’. And it does so with nervous messages, invaginating the lower ∆-1 chemical language of cells with nervous receptors, or the gravitational with electromagnetic waves.

Finally the quanta of the energy level is disconnected and easy prey for the body herds.

Unlike disconnected quanta or herding of parallel quanta in the same ∆-plane by simple communication with neighbors to maintain distances, or reproduction of a wave that imprints its form in a lower scale, ∆-1, network creation is multiplicative, ∏, as the number of axons is a potency law of its neurons and this makes it more powerful. Since it has a faster language to connect at the ∆+1 scale, but a potency of its numbers communicating in the lower chemical scale in neurons or gravitatomagnetic language in physical systems.

Thus as we see the field of åctions analysis gets more complex in terms of information when we study the higher åctions. And it gets more mathematical when we study lower åctions.

The program of existence: Maximize your existence – evolve socially.

An exhaustive analysis of all events and åctions of all systems, from the 4+1 quantum åctions-numbers of particles to the 5 drives of existence of biological beings to the 5 quantum åctions of humans, show that all systems try to maximize its 5 survival åctions, according to the sequential and frequency laws aforementioned, creating a ‘Maslow pyramid’ of behavior for all of them – the program of the Universe.

The 5th action, though is often unwanted and hence not considered in most scientific studies, because it is most often imposed externally by the ∆+1 neuronal/informative, ‘superior’ species that absorbs the energy of the lower herd treated as energy. So it is not a ‘quantum number’ but the action of informative quarks that capture electrons to form the atomic organism.

It is not a human action, but the imposition of people-castes that control our languages of information (politicians with laws, bankers with money) and create states and markets that control and absorb our wealth. It is not the desire of cells in a multicellular organism, which are controlled in motion and information by neurons.

– Tƒ maximize your existence, Max. ∑Sp∆-1 <=>Tƒ∆+1, the simplest strategy is to maximize the components of the equation, the 4 positive arrows-åctions: Sp=energy feeding, I=information processing, <=> or X, Reproduction and ∑, social evolution and the selfless action of giving away your energy to sustain a ‘higher plane of forms’, which can be observed in the sacrifice of individuals from their nations, their subconscious collective Gods, or in physical space in the loss of form of individual orbitals when the pi or sigma molecular orbitals appear, or the transfer of energy from electric to magnetic fields and so on.

– This gives birth to the duality of ‘social arrows’, as the 4D arrow of herding among clone cells/waves to create ‘spaces’ (defined by Riemann as groups of ‘similar points’ described by properties of continuity, etc.’) might be called in mystique terms the arrow of ‘democratic, social love’ and extract and ethic generalization: forms that feel equal act in parallel and love each other; while the 5D arrow is hierarchical, Darwinian, as ‘forms who are different’ prey ‘perpendicularly’ to each other, transferring energy, Sp∆-1>Tƒ from the lower scale to the upper scale and information, Tƒ>Sp∆-1, from the upper to the lower scale. More deductions from the Program:

– You can maximize the function of existence when S=T->Max SxT (mathematical rule: 5×5>9×1).

This is known intuitively, as we say ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’ where Sp(body/field) and I (head/particle).

It is the origin of the need to have our vital constants in balance, of the balance of Universal Constants, which are Sp/O or SxT ratios (as in the equations of gravitational and electromagnetic constants, where q-m are clocks of information and distances, Sp, hence they write as F=Q,G(Tƒ/Sp).

It explains the attraction of beauty, a shape in which form and energy are balanced, S=T; the beauty of top predator species – a species that maximizes its body force (Sp), intelligence (O) and beauty (S=T), in physical space one with maximal M(T) x V(Sp) momentum, which in physical collisions survives and defines the final trajectory; the classic shapes of the commonest spiral galaxies, etc. It explains why live longer in our mature, S=T, age between energetic youth and informative 3rd age; why death happens by excess of energy (Max. Spin accidents and wars) or information (Max.Tƒ in the 3rd age when we warp and wrinkle); and many other facts.

– You can maximize your existence, when ∑->∞ that explains the huge quanta in spaces that last, from the ultimate vacuum of the Universe to the seas of water, to the power of ∑=Love in social systems, to the undistinguishable boson structures of immortal beings, from light to black holes (bosons of quark stars) to minds – ‘zero points’ that map out with self-similar pixels of information an external Universe into a linguistic infinitesimal image of it – to herds and waves that become tighter, multicellular organisms that survive better.

– It explains the engine of human existence: greed for Sp-food, Information, sex (SxT), 4D-love & 5D-power.

For example, if we are to consider informative systems alone, the creation of a boson, zero point in which an infinite number of self-similar, ∑-forms converge is another path to maximize the function of existence.

Thus the highest of all åctions is the social experience, and we can truly write those åctions in chains from the lowest one – physical motion, to the highest one – social love, reason why people like more prophets than physicists, the maximize more their existence.

So all what species do is: >O: Gauge information; i, herding with parallel beings or SxT, merge into complementary systems;  combining those simplex åctions in a single plane, across 3±∆ scales:

– Reproducing self-similar entities: Œ>∑Œ∆-1>œ or evolving socially with them into bigger networks, creating more complex planes of existence, fractal super-organisms: ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ

All what any entity including humans do during our entire existence from seminal cell to dying body, all can be explained with those 6 åctions: Feeding, informing, moving, reproducing and networking into social groups.

Further on each of the 5 ‘existential åctions’  form together a causal sequence, as complex åctions need previous simpler ones to ‘exi=st’

. Thus åctions, functions=forms=dimensions & time sequences are related, creating parallel invariances that define each  fractal’ diffeomorphic entity or ‘world’ constantly ‘filling’ with those dimensional åctions its vital space, part made to the likeness of the whole Universe:

– ∆ï: Any entity needs first to perceive-gauge information from an advantageous ‘point of view’. So all p.o.v.s, are ‘on top’ in the dimension of height, from heads to antennae to black holes.

-∆A, And then it needs to move changing its trajectory, hence accelerating to get to:

– ∆Sp: Then the entity will move to a field of energy to feed, through its faster lineal path. So ‘length’ becomes the dimension of energy and main body orientation, from ¥-fields to sharks.

– Then we communicate e<= >o with similar beings to herd or reproduce in ‘empty’ regions of space-time, so width becomes the reproductive or communicative 3rd spatial dimension, where we accumulate new cells, send our words as we walk in parallel dimension.

– We observe also those 3 perpendicular dimensions in ¥-light fields, corresponding to their diffeomorphic electric=informative, magnetic= energetic and reproductive c-speed, product of SxT (Maxwell’s equations). Since light is not an abstract, independent space-time background: Our mental space-time is made of ¥-information, so we share its Euclidean 3 Dimensions. Vacuum space is light. So background radiation cannot be extracted: it is space itself.

So the 3 Space-dimensions are functional åctions with a causal sequence:

Informing (Height)Communicating/reproducing (width).

The program of the Fractal Universe and its Generator Equation. The will of Πsuperorganisms.

Now if we eliminate the action of motion, for which the organism hardly needs more than limbs to take advantage of the flow of forces, we can search for the ‘inner will’ that motivate those åctions, the coding factors.

The 5th isomorphism of all Œ super organisms is thus their program of existence or 4 Drives of Life, which biology ‘cracked’ regarding the living organisms it studies, since it carries the highest truth of all sciences.

As all isomorphisms, the need of systems to construct its 3±1 common ∆±1 dimensions of scalar space-time, energy limbs/fields/territories, reproductive bodies/waves/working classes & informative particles/heads /upper classes and ∆±1 social scales, determine the 3+1 drives of existence all Nature’s ‘surviving’ systems follow:

– Max.Tƒ: All gauge information with their heads/particles to guide their search for Energy or else they die.

– Max. Sp: All systems feed on energy with limbs/fields. Since if they don’t, they become exhausted and die.

– Sp x TƒSp=Tƒ: All reproduce/iterate/decouple into new organisms and particles. Since, as they are limited in time duration, if they don’t repeat their topologic structures they become extinct.

– ∑Sp, ∏Tƒ: All evolve socially into higher systems and associate with similar forms; whereas simple ‘energy beings/cells’ form ∑=herds, simply connected to hunt and feed; while complex, ‘informative beings/neurons’ form complex networks, in which each individual is connected to all others. Hence the ∏-multiplicative symbol counts not the informative neurons but the connective axons that make efficient ∏-networks dominate ∑-herds.

Thus we rewrite scalar Space-time Metric as a Fractal generator of the ∞ Wills of the Universe, which encodes all the isomorphisms, parts, events and scales of all its Œ superorganisms: ∞ ∑Sp∆-1 ≤ ST∆ ≥ ∏Tƒ∆+1

The Generator equation’s 3±∆ symbols describe the fundamental particle of reality, its 3±1 Wills & ternary structure, both in time and space: a cellular, social, ternary organism, each one distinguished by a balanced set of Sp≈Tƒ vital, biologic or universal, physical constants, which freeze the energy and information of the being into stable, balanced proportions, which define a specific variety or ‘species’ of the fractal generator.

So we can translate all ‘laws’ of the different scales and species of all scalar sciences, and the ‘parts’ of its organisms, as events related to the 3±∆ ‘drives of existence’ of the Generator Equation of all systems. It is then possible to generate all what is real, departing from the Generator, the symmetries and Constant proportions among the 10Dis of reality and the laws of i-logic mathematics, as this writer has done in his research.


Åctions are ordered also in time, parallel to its symmetry in scales – relationship that between time ages and ∆-scales we have observed already in the study of the meaning of past, present and future, now further proved through the order of åctions:


Well it is not the same order than the vowels but almost (-;

Synchronicities of knots of time arrows.

Finally another theme of importance regarding action, which we treat in other sections, mainly in time and planes are its synchronicity between planes, as the smallest åctions are faster and repeat more, so we do more ‘gravitational steps for each second-perception, and feed only once a day reproduce once a year and evolve socially through our entire life.  This is the most important reason for the order of the organic systems of reality.

For example, the faster åctions of cells (i.e. daily reproduction) are synchronized to the slower energy feeding cycle of its ∆+1 scale, which gives the energy it needs to put its information at work and enable the reproduction.

it also follows that the emergence of an action above, makes it a product of the lower ones Ao(∆-3) x Ae (∆-2) = Œ∆-1

That is the cell takes its genetic, information coded in a few atoms, the energy obtained from above and reproduces the system.

Each active organism is a complex chain of cyclical åctions performed to achieve the 4 main arrows of time. Yet that chaos of action is ordered by causal processes, synchronized clocks and ‘—motions’/information networks that harmonize all those seemingly chaotic cycles of åctions into a dance of existential beats, interdependent and in permanent symbiosis – being the key to those harmonies among different Time Arrows the concept of ‘time-speed’, the speed at which a certain cycle of time closes its trajectory into a ‘loop’ or event (spatial/temporal description) that will be repeated with a frequency that defines the regularity of the time cycle and its speed of perception.

For example, the subjective cycle of time perception in man is the cycle of informative perception determined by the wink of the eye which opens to absorb ‘—motions’ and closes when it processes it as information every second. This rhythm is self-similar to the rhythm of the heart, which is approximately of a beat per second, when blood is expanded as ‘—motions’ and imploded carrying the released chemical information of the body. So, since we have a thought per second and a beat per second, the second is in fact the ‘clock-time’ of the human brain and the mechanical instruments we use to compare all the cycles of time of the Universe with our own cycles.

Each species and cycle of time has a different frequency, which depends on the ‘size’ of the species we study, and the causality of those arrows, such as:

Max. ‘—motions’-extension=Min. Speed-Frequency of Time cycles:

Max. Speed/frequency: Informative cycle->Energetic ->Reproductive ->Social cycle: Min. Frequency.

For example, the cycle of perception of the human eye – each second –determines the beat of the heart/breathing cycle of ‘—motions’ for the body; the cycle of rotation of the Sun-Earth system – a day – determines the ‘—motions’ cycle of the planetary surface, whose microscopic, life-species adjust their energetic /formative, awaken/sleep cycle to that of the bigger organism. And vice versa, the smaller microscopic cells of the body reproduce each day, according to that awaken/sleep cycle. There are in fact a series of General Isomorphisms of synchronicity between those Time Arrows/cycles that apply to any entity or complex system of the Universe, which extends through several scales of spatial size and informative complexity.

All the åctions of all species can in fact be described by ‘beats’ of existence, partial sub-equations of the Generator Equation, which define rhythmical chains of action. In an individual those beats of existence become the life rhythms of each of our organs, from the eye that feeds on light and then informs the brain, which produces a visual thought every second (the blink time of the eye), (o->e->o) to the night/day, dreaming/acting rhythm (Release of chemical information->dreaming->release of ‘—motions’->acting), etc.

A 2nd series of ternary rhythms occur as organisms switch between the 3 physiological networks of hormonal, reproductive activity; nervous, informative activity and feeding, energetic activity (Re->in->en).

Those rhythms happen also in the social scale of existence as a single organism, cell of our civilizations. In society those rhythms shape the ternary bio-rhythms of our daily life; the 8 hours of work (obtaining our social ‘—motions’, money), 8 hours of play (dedicated to family reproduction), and 8 hours of sleep (when our organism repairs its form). Moreover those rhythms of our daily life are synchronous to the rhythms of the global organism, Gaia; and self-similar rhythms are found in the activity of animals and plants.

Since in objective terms humans are created by the same temporal arrows and display the same properties than the rest of the entities of the Universe. A human being is the same kind of entity than ‘an atom’ – a complex chain of time cycles of ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. The difference is not of quality but of quantity and hence of complexity: Humans are knots of an enormous amount of time cycles whose spatial topologies, åctions and motions configure our existence.

On the other extreme of simplicity, an atomic particle (quark, electron or photon) is the simpler species, we can study with those arrows, in terms of size and complexity of its ‘action’ cycles, compared to a human being. Since a particle can be described with just 4 quantum numbers that resume the 4 kinds of ‘åctions’ particles constantly perform:

– Particles gauge information (reason why quantum theory is a ‘gauge theory’). That is, they calculate the distances with other atoms and act-react to exchanges of ‘—motions’ and information with them.

– Particles feed on ‘—motions’, absorbing electromagnetic and gravitational forces and other particles.

– Particles decouple, repeating themselves in other regions of space-time (they reproduce by iterating its particles, quarks, electrons and photons).

– Finally particles evolve together into complex social structures, called atoms and molecules, which also feed on ‘—motions’, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

All those ‘motions’, quantum numbers, molecular vibrations, decouplings and physical events can be re-considered as manifestations of the 4 main arrows of time, chained in synchronic patterns and cycles, cyclical and lineal geometries, whose abstract definition conform the Isomorphisms of quantum physics.

The description physicists do of those arrows is an abstract, mathematical, mechanical description, which corresponds to the limits of the mechanical, monist, ‘religious’ philosophy of science of our founding fathers4, which did not require an ‘internal’, self-organizing will to describe the Universe, since it was understood that the ‘will’, the ‘why’ of all the clock-like motions of the Universe was ‘God’, an entity that seems to have appeared to a pastor of the bronze age.

System sciences reasons those ultimate questions from the perspective of science and its mathematical and logic languages, albeit with a degree of complexity superior to that provided by monist, reductionist, mechanist, classic scientific philosophies of reality. Thus we substitute the ‘will of a personal God’ or any other anthropic principle with the 4 objective ‘arrows of causality’ or Time Arrows that all particles and entities of ‘existence’ follow, which can be described objectively with mathematical and logical equations, and finds in the subjective will for survival its sufficient reason.

Further on, all quantum entities obey the Complementarity Principle. They show 2 states or structures that co-exist simultaneously: a field of energetic forces that moves a particle of information, which gauges the space-time that surrounds the particle. And we cannot distinguish or perceive both entities: the force/body and head/particle together. In other words, physical entities are made of ‘motion fields’ and ‘gauging particles’.

They constantly move, stop and gauge information, move, gauge… So because they have 2 components, one specialized in energetic motions (the field of forces) and one specialized in informative gauging (the particle, mass or charge), all their åctions are either ‘energetic åctions’, informative gauging, the combinations of both type of åctions (decouplings, which produce self-similar particles) or more complex åctions in which the particle, atom or molecule share smaller particles, called bosons, creating social networks, made of fields of forces and particles of information.

If we widen the concept of ‘—motions’ as lineal, expansive motion, and information as a cyclical, in/formative motion, we realize that the biological realm also follows a Principle of Complementarity between reproductive bodies and informative heads, which co-exist together in living beings. And bodies are responsible for ‘—motions’, while heads map out the Universe, creating images, reflected in the mind of the external motions of reality, imitated by small cyclical motions within the brain and its neurons. So again we observe a dual structure, body/head, with energetic/informative properties that move and gauge, feed on ‘—motions’ and perceive information. And in more complex events, reproduce the biological entity or use languages of information to create complex social structures.

All what exists is a ‘fractal knot of ‘—motions’ and information motions’, whose why is ‘to absorb more ‘—motions’ and information’ from the perspective of the entity or ‘point of view’ that gauge and moves in the Universe. Imagine a universe of infinite ‘species’ made of ‘‘—motions’’, ‘forces or bodies’, upon which certain structures of information, called ‘cyclical motions’, particles or heads, are sustained. Reality is a fractal sum of those 2 motions, ‘—motions’ and information, which combine to create an infinite number of entities that gauge information, feed on ‘—motions’, reproduce their form and evolve into social structures till reaching the complex Universe.

We cannot describe human åctions with simple equations because humans can gauge many types of information, feed in many forms of different ‘—motions’, choose many different couples to court, love and reproduce, and make very complex choices in our decisions on how to relate socially to other human beings. But at the end of the journey, amazingly enough we observe that all what we humans do is also gauging information, absorbing ‘—motions’, reproducing and evolve into social systems. So those 4 types of events or causal arrows of time are all what we humans do; even if we use a complex, ‘ambiguous’ language – words -to describe those åctions.

Tƒ exist, to be in this Universe means to absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information, reproduce our form and evolve socially by acts of communication with other beings. Those ‘åctions’ are considered mechanical in the physical world and åctions of will in the human world. Yet they are described in both worlds with the same ‘2 elements’: ‘—motions’ and clocks of time. So Planck proved that all physical forces are made of h-quanta, whose parameters are ‘‘—motions’ and time’, while we say in layman terms that ‘we do not have enough time and ‘—motions’ to do this’ – meaning we are made of a limited quantity of vital space, our ‘—motions’/body, and time-clocks of information – our minds.

There is no difference between ‘us’, human beings and ‘particles’ that also have a limited ‘—motions’ and time, which they spend performing the same game of 4 types of åctions – the Game of Existence. We all play the same game, regardless of what plays it, an atom, or a human being.

Religions will tell you that the ‘will’ of man is a property of ‘our soul’, which is supposed to exist according to the tradition of our ‘pious’ founding father, Mr. Descartes, in some non-local space-time4. Stience will tell you that the ‘will of man’ is the ‘why’ we don’t ask, or at best it will be born of a chaotic series of circumstances and physical events that come together to ‘create life’. While biologists will affirm that the will of man has the same drives of existence (gauging, feeding, reproducing and evolving socially) that all forms of life have, but only forms of life have.

System sciences depart from anthropomorphic traditions, validating instead the ideas of Eastern philosophies (Taoism, Buddhism, Zurvanism), upgraded with the scientific method, showing that the Universe is ‘organic’, not mechanical, because all its particles share the ‘4 drives of existence’ of biological beings, whose ‘why’ is self-evident in a world made of perpetual motions. Since if we all are made of motions, life is embedded in the existence of those motions that repeat themselves by the mere ‘action of moving’: Reproduction becomes natural to the existence itself of cyclical and ‘—motions’ that repeat their forms as they trace their trajectories.

If we leave aside metaphysical, subjective questions on the ‘nature of consciousness’ and ‘will’, we could affirm that all entities of the Universe have both, a ‘will of existence’, shown in its constant pursuit of those 4 arrows, and an objective nature, in as much as those 4 arrows or wills can be proved objectively by the events that atoms, humans, animals or any other entity perform. It is though necessary to understand in which scale of reality a certain region of Time-space ‘acts’. For example, a chair, made with human formal imagination is not organic neither it shows any of the 4 main arrows of time unless it is attached to a human being (so it helps humans to think- process information – in a ‘still’, formal position). Yet at the spatial scale of atomic wood, the chair shows those arrows and in the temporal distance when the chair was wood, it had also at macroscopic level those vital arrows of time.

What is then reality – the ultimate meaning of those time arrows? At first sight, it seems there is no meaning at all, but merely the eternal beat of existence, ‘—motions’ becoming form, becoming ‘—motions’… and the sensations related to those motions, which might be shared by all realities – pain/pressure and pleasure/release.

A closer view on both arrows and the complementarity of all physical and biological entities, which achieve immortality through reproduction of their own form – from light imprinting its waves on the vacuum, to quarks jetting bundles of ‘quarkitos’, to humans ‘growing and multiplying’ all over the Earth – seemingly makes the 3rd existential arrow of reproduction, the meaning of it all, and the Universe a constant orgasm of repetitive, present forms.

But then, we realize that reproduction in itself is just a step towards self-organization, as self-similar cells that can ‘decode’ their common language of information come together into stronger, bigger waves, herds and organisms, which survive better, due to their higher ∑SxT, existential force. So the answer to the meaning of it all is clear: the Universe has a dominant arrow, the creation of ‘fractal superorganisms’, species which are self-similar to their parts and emerge through processes of evolution into bigger wholes.

Since the 4 main arrows of time and its discontinuous cycles come together, creating vital knots of motions that energize, gauge information, reproduce and finally evolve socially into herds and organisms: T->S->ST->S. In other words, a fractal infinite Universe of ‘—motions’ and information struggles to create ‘more of it’ by expanding inwards and outwards its relative scales of organic size; since a Universe made of motions has no limits of size and form, as it becomes ever more organized in bigger and smaller social herds and organisms: T->S->ST->S.

Yet even if social evolution is the dominant arrow of the Universe, it is also the less common, more distanced in the frequency of its events, since all other arrows must exist ‘a priori’ for an event of social evolution – the final causal arrow of reality – to take place, thanks to a common language that carries information among self-similar cellular individuals.

The highest frequency of events always corresponds to informative events, particles and heads gauging and thinking, mapping reality with its hardware, as they run inside the software of a force, whose frequency carries informations decoded and transferred into such mappings. So the atom figures out first in its inner quark-systems how to move, searching for a flow of ‘—motions’ or its relocation in harmony with the other atoms of its web, while an office clerk thinks first and then writes or makes a call related to those informative thoughts – an act of measure precedes an act of motion.

Accordingly to those frequencies and the generic law, Min.Sp= Max.Tƒ, the light pixels of informative mappings are smaller and faster to allow faster events/cycles of perception than the bits of ‘—motions’ that feed the body – amino acids, which are smaller than the seminal cells that carry the information of reproductive acts, which are smaller than the units of social evolution (other humans).

So happens to the frequency of perception (each second), faster than that of feeding, which happens more often than the frequency of sexual reproduction, which is more common than our acts of love – social acts of evolution that ‘collapse’ a wave of individuals into a particle/organism, emerging as a whole action, born of the self-organization of its parts, such as a religious mass or a voting action, or a marriage, all acts that create social groups.

Yet, the ultimate why of any chain of causal Time Arrows must be found in the goal of ‘survival’, the final drive of all entities of the Universe, maximized by its 2 complex arrows, reproduction and social evolution that evolves cellular entities into macrocosmic wholes, which become cellular entities of a higher ‘space-time plane’.

What we are then can be expressed in more poetic terms: knots of existence, flows of arrows of time, mirrors of information, bodies in action, ‘wills of the penis’14, loving cells of bigger social units, exi=stential flows, ‘vanitas, vanitatum et omnia vanitates’; motions of time in perpetual conflict.

The rules of engagement of all those knots of time, ‘points of view’ that gauge information, seek for ‘—motions’, reproduce and evolve socially, creating ‘ad eternal’ the infinite scales upwards and inwards, is the ultimate knowledge of the game of existence, which system sciences study.

This holistic view is a mystique revealing existence of the unity of it all, which few self-centered humans accept. Scientists rejected it in the past, because it had not been properly formalized. But one of the advantages of the new formalism of Non-Euclidean, fractal, logic, causal chains of Time Arrows/events, is that it renders a mathematical analysis of those arrows of times are its generic isomorphisms, hence allowing their application to the study of the species of any scientific network of self-similar points in an open flow of communication.

Thus, the range and power of the formalism of Multiple Spaces-Times will not become evident till we develop the logic of multiple causes and the non-Euclidean geometry of flows of communication between the fundamental particles of the Universe, its non-Euclidean, Fractal points. A consequence of those postulates is in fact the definition of a soul as a non-Euclidean point of view:

‘Every point of view=mind feels the center of the Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point that stores a limited mapping of reality with its informative languages.’

We are all Atmans, informative CPUs, souls that gauge in different languages reality, to construct a mental mapping that caters to our point of view and arrows of time. So we create our ‘perceived Universe’ – a fact known from Descartes to Schopenhauer, but lost to ‘naïve, realist’ physicists. All of them thinking clocks are the only point that matters to measure time, and the human mind, the only ego that knots ‘—motions’ into form, since that is the only perspective they perceive. That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the only intelligent species.

All is memorial because cyclical inertia, the repetition of the cycles of existence of any form, is common to all space-time fields. This is a tautology: a species that forgets, that does not repeat a fractal cycle of existence becomes extinct and its cycles of existence disappear. Thus, a being has to remember and repeat its fractal cycles to last in time. That is the existential game of any being: to feed on ‘—motions’ and use its genetic, memorial information to transform it through reproduction into new cyclical åctions.

Yet those åctions are encoded in ‘fractal equations of information’ which are logical chains that constantly repeat themselves, becoming memorial patterns. Those patterns have different names in science: genes in biology, memes in history, Universal constants, which are proportions between physical ‘—motions’ and information in physics, etc. Yet what all those fractal equations and e/o proportions become are cyclical, self-repetitive events that respond to an arrow of time.

Recap: All what exi=st is a fractal knot of cycles of ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. There is not a difference of quality among universal entities – only a difference in the quantity and complexity of those cyclical arrows that ‘inform’ each species of reality. The ultimate meaning of a Universe made of time motions not of spatial forms is closer to a Philosophical tradition that ranges from Plato and Buddha to Leibniz and Schopenhauer: reality is a game of ‘fractal mirrors’, souls=Atmans= quantum knots of information that gauge reality to absorb ‘—motions’ in order to repeat=iterate=reproduce their form. Since we are all fractal parts of the whole with a limited duration in time and a limited quantity of space. And so only those species, which reproduce their ‘logic arrows’ of time, their information, in other zone of space survive. Thus the game of existence is in essence a game of repetition of forms, a game of exi=stences.

The first rhythm: motion and perception, ∆ï, ∆a


In the graph, the order of actions always starts from a o-point of view or informative brain system, attached to a sensorial membrane, which divides the system in the outer and inner world (left point), and starts to interact with other fractal points to develop its actions.

So let us start with the first two words.

If you ask me what is the Universe i would tell you look at its rhythms, it is this beat you hear everywhere, this stop and go motion, motion and form, still and moving, decelerating accelerating, steady state, beat, beat, and rhythms all over the place. And so we call the motions time, and the forms space, and the go time and the stop space, and the stillness of the mind safe, and the rhythms of the body time, and time and space, that’s all.

All there is to it, the rhythms of time and space:

Stop (S) < Go (Time) > Die (space) < Live (time)≈Move≈ Accelerate (Vortex of Time) < Stop (Space)…

in all its infinite varieties the rhythms of space-time broken in infinite strings, knotted in infinite minds of cycles command, form and deform, inform and r=evolve, dissolve, exist. And this tapestry of Existence is what we call the Universe:

±∆  Sp(Go-Feed) x Tƒ (Stop-Reproduce) =ST

The mixture of motions of time and forms of space, of stop and go motions and dimensions, their intertwined intelligent, is what it is all about.

We shall call any mixture of at least a motion of time and a dimension of space, an action of space-time, the fundamental ‘quanta-bit’ of reality, its minimal, ‘infinitesimal’, perceivable, as pure time and pure space are not.

The meaning of reality thus becomes apparent when we go beyond the simplest description of its topological, physical properties as a series of time motions that mess with spatial forms to create bidimensional membranes, which magically construct frozen space-time topologies with functions. Where is the intelligence? now we know: in the meaning of those åctions, which is a biological program.

In the next posts we shall develop the mixture of biological and topological i-logic properties that defines the game of existence, here we shall define the game.

All systems of spatial energy and temporal information, guided by a zero-point, the most perfect spherical geometry, or monad of the system, O-point x ∞ Universe = Θ Still mind of reality, show a will: SURVIVAL.

And survival has an easy mathematical expression in a Universe made of 2 formal motions and its combinations, Ox|=Ø:

absorb and emit energy and information. Those are thus the rules, ±∆e x i… Maximize a simple function of existence of your energetic and informative, spatial and temporal parts playing the game of survival called LIFE.

Because indeed, what the åctions of energy feeding, energy expelling=moving, information expelling=reproducing and communicating and information absorbing=perceiving causes is a game of existence equal to what biologists define as life, a game of moving, reproducing feeding and perceiving.

That’s all there is to it space-time has a vital nature. And the åctions of space-time which ‘truly exist’, as they are by definition that limiting present thin line… show it in detail.

We thus call the 5 åctions of the Universe, ∆e=feeding, -∆e=moving, ∆ï=observing, -∆œ:reproducing and U=∆+1, social evolution into higher planes of space-time, the game of existence:

Tƒ < ExI=ST  is then a curious acronym with an artistic, ideographic flavor. Tƒ is the O-point, the head, < the neck, its communication with the body, ExI, the place of present existence, the wave that reproduces its energy and information, as it evolves and r=evolves and moves through a social Plane, its Universal, Its ST world.

The interaction of all those arrows of time through space-time åctions require though the introduction of a ‘point of view’ or frame of reference, which will give organic meaning to that series of arrows and cycles of time, creating the knots of time, or existential points that carry the program of the Universe as they give survival meaning to the åctions and cycles knotted within the point:

THUS if we do a qualitative analysis things remain simple, as it is the program of survival of the universe, the ultimate why of all existences – simple enough to be just åctions of absorption of (kinetic) energy and in-Form-ation.

And this which is a trend of all T.Œ, complexity ultimately can be reduced to the dualities, ternary elements and 4 Dimensional simplex åctions of the Universe.

Further on, those space-time åctions communicate an Œ, point of existence, which ultimately is a knot of åctions, with its external world. So those åctions of communication of information (i), bring about the more complex åctions of the Universe, which we gather in the process of eusocial evolutions from ∏ Œ∆-1 points into U∆, Universals.

This process, we study as the creation of a ‘higher, bigger scale’ of existence, and hence implies two new type of complex åctions:

  • Present reproduction of the system, ∆Œ and…
  • Future, social evolution into Universals through the creation of complex herds that become super organisms.

In that sense the finality of the Universe is not the survival of the individual but the creation of complex social systems, caused by the complex åctions, for which simplex åctions seems a mere preparation, hence the ‘pinnacle’ of existence is to form part and create a ‘social world’, an ∆+1 Universal, the dissolution of the ego of individual points into the collective.

In that sense, since both, the absorption and emission of bits of information and ‘bites’ of energy happens across ∆-scales (we like to call those quanta of information, bits, acronym also for bidimensional manifolds of space-time information, and bites, bits with energy :), the 3rd fundamental element of Action ‘Theory’ is the study of 5D processes of emission and absorption of smaller bits and bites of information and energy by a higher social organisms of an upper plane of the Universe.

Thus the study of simplex, ±e,i åctions, of the codes of each species that program them to follow those survival åctions; of the higher game of social reproduction and evolution that creates Universals, and the interaction of the being which performs those åctions with lower bits and bites and bigger social wholes, becomes the fundamental experimental and theoretical combined space-time analysis of any species.

Actions are on that regard along with super organisms in the larger ST-Plane, the ‘flesh’ of the Universe…

The two levels of complexity of Universal åctions.

Thus to resume that dual ‘build-up’ program of existence, we can write an equation of existential algebra: ∫ ±∆ e, i ds dt= Wu.

That is, the sum of all the simplex åctions of the being, integrated along its vital ‘cellular’ space, ds, and its whole duration in time, dt, gives us a Universal Organism in space, U, that goes through a world cycle in time, ω, throughout all its existence, in which it will live, might reproduce in other space-time, elongating its function of existence into the future, and then die.

Now existential algebra is a logic interpretation of the space-time events of the universe, so we do not need at this state to know what we are representing. That equation can represent the life of a star, a human being, a cell, the extension of a electromagnetic field, a ‘finite fractal space-time’ reality. It represents merely one of the many ways to analyze the synoptic  ‘generator equation’, Sp≈Tƒ, in terms of space-time åctions, world cycles and super organisms:

Once a series of simplex ±∆e,i åctions are performed, the Uw game represents a second level of complexity in which åctions are combined into space-time knots, œ, which communicate with and reproduce similar beings, evolving socially into Universals.

Thus, this second ‘layer of complexity’ of the being, creates new planes of the 5th dimension as the reproduction and social evolution of those œ-points creates from parts the wholes of reality. And so we talk of a ‘second’ complex beat of existence:


Thus the scalar Universe is an ‘architectonical, dynamic, nested, integrative, Russian Doll’:

The sum of ±e,i, åctions do bring together sequentially in time, accumulated socially in space, the reproduction and creation of Universal Organisms. And so we talk of 2 final åctions, iteration by reproduction of communication and social evolution of parts into Universals, which would complete at a higher 5D level the existence of the being.

The sequential order of åctions is transmitted to world cycles of life and death.

Thus Changes of motion or acceleration, ∆a, absorption of energy, ∆e, of information, ∆ï, communication and iteration of information ∆œ and social evolution that unites individuals into Universals, ∆u, brings all together nicely in a 5 vowel system, of increasing complexity in the åctions of beings, which first:

->+∆ï observe a field of energy ->∆a move towards it ->∆e absorb energy -> ∆ï communicate with other beings to hunt in herds, or ∆œ, reproduce the inner information starting an iterative clone flow, which -> ∆U, will evolve socially.

So we talk of simplex chains of åctions, ∆ï-∆a-∆e and complex changes Œ-∆U (communication, reproduction and social evolution), and it is clear that in the first change ‘energy’ dominates and in the second change ‘information’ is all.

Now, the reader should observe that the simplex åctions of the first scale roughly order themselves as the world cycles do. So it is the emergence of the sum of infinitesimal åctions, what creates the order of the 3 ages of life in the larger super organism total existence.

Actions across multiple chains of existence.

How can we differentiate the 2 complex åctions of reproductive iteration and Universals evolution – the åctions, which do imply massive motions across ∆-planes of the 5th dimension?

We integrate both, in the symbol U, and study apart the way in which systems ‘iterate’ its forms across different planes of existence.

On the other hand Actions are always exchanges of energy and information between two ∆-∆ planes of existence. And so there are 5 åctions:

Social relationships between i<-i(∆=0): Au. Seminal seeds: ∆->∆-1 (∆=1): AI

Energy feeding: ∆->∆-2: Ae.   Informative perception:  ∆->∆-3: Ao; and changes in motion: ∆-∆-4: Aa.

Actions thus require to understand the other form of travel through the 5th dimension – not a temporal travel through the ages of evolution, in which the whole system is carried through the metric of the 5th dimension; but a travel that involves only the ‘transfer’ of energy or information, between two poles.

And so we dedicate a whole post, to understand this fundamental element of the 5th dimension: transfer of ‘Spatial Momentum’ Sp, or Spatial Energy, Sp between two planes and its inverse: transfer of form. In this post we will briefly analyze and classify åctions in physical, biological and social systems, and study the 5 åctions briefly.

Actions in a single plane of existence.

Physical Actions

In physics an action is the fundamental present, ST element of the Universe that combines energy and time:

Spe x Tƒ = ST

So for example, a Planck constant is an action of Energy and Time: Ex T = H

We are not using though the same concept in relational space-time, changing in this rare occasion the formula, as we prefer the qualitative concept for action, closer to the sentence that opens this paragraph: ‘don’t confuse motion, Sp, for action: Sp x Tƒ= ST’.

We thus call an action, the quanta of existence, a derivative or ‘unit of force’, which all systems display to exchange energy and information with the environment, to achieve in this manner the 2 higher goals of existence: reproduction and social evolution of parts into wholes, new units of a higher plane of the 5th dimension.

We could consider then all possible ‘åctions’ of past-energy and future-information that combine together. Action is the ‘short’ present dimension, the most complex, rich and important element within a single plane of existence. And the study of this basic concept of physics and its ∆ST equivalent: combinations of form and motion into purposeful åctions is essential to many fields and science.

Social Actions.

But probably the man who better understood its concept in the upper scales of life was Hemingway in the above sentence; for an action to be meaningful it must have both motion (P) and form (F), yin and yang, in purposeful combination. Most motions today are confused with åctions – demonstrations without purpose. Social Actions must have a point-like directionality, a form, a goal. 

Thus the classic concept of physics and normal language, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this (action)’ do open a wide field of physical, biological and psychological, social analysis.

Actions in multiple planes of existence.

In ∆ST, however we define a much wider concept of an action.

An action in that sense is better understood in normal languages: an action is what all entities of the Universe constantly do. Our program of existence. And it can be mathematically defined with the tools of Existential Algebra. Thus we define an Existential action:

‘ An action is a flow of energy and information between 2 consecutive planes of existence: ∆-∆≤A≥∆-(∆+1) ‘ 

Since ∆±4 are the planes of existence, it follows that there are only 4 possible Actions.

Thus we divide åctions into 5 fundamental types in which the ∆-being relates through exchanges of energy and information to each of the lower and single scale it perceives.

–  We absorb and process energy for our system, ∆Sp, we absorb and process information, ∆ï, we iterate our systems, ∆œ, we socialize in groups, ∆U, and we move around, accelerating and decelerating to do so, ∆A.

And as it happens, we do all that by interacting between our ∆-∆ scale and a higher scale of reality:

We move through ∆-4 gravitational forces, which change our steady state (inertial speed) into acceleration and decelerations:  Aa: ∆a(∆-4>∆-3)

We perceive light and electronic quanta to inform ourselves: Ao: ∆ï(∆-3>-2)

We absorb ∆-2 energy quanta (amino acids) to recompose our bodies: Ae: ∆e(∆-2>-1)

We reproduce through ∆-1 seminal seeds which emerge in our scale: Ai: ∆r(∆-1>i)

(and for other species, NOT to provoke the anthropomorphism of humans we talk of iteration in other species, hence we call this action Ai.)

And we socialize with individuals like us creating societies that in its larger form become universal. Au: ∆u(i>∆+1). And that is why all fits nicely.

The æ,e,ï,œ,û of åctions is all what we do.

All what humans and everything else do are varieties of those 5 åctions. So write this 5th isomorphism with another simple equation:

∆a(∆-4>∆-3), ∆ï(∆-3>-2), ∆e(∆-2>-1), ∆œ(∆-1>œ),and ∆u(∑œ>∆+1)

This is the simplest mathematical and conceptual definition of the åctions of reality.

 Let us study it in more detail.


The Universe is a fractal of space-time actions. This simple truth originates all its complexity.

Planck discovered the Universe is made of quanta of a substance he called ‘action’ made of energy akin to lineal motion, locomotion and time, akin to cyclical motion, repetition of a cyclical form of in-form-ation. In his equations, Action = Energy x Time, in relativity where time was a simultaneous present moment, we see it as a bit of information, Action = Energy x Information.

So we are made of motion and form, energy and time cycles, and we reproduce through time cycles forms in motion, informations. We are all just waves of reproductive information, and when we are reproduced in herds, they assembly into a larger puzzle or fractal of self-similar forms, we call a fractal super organism, and this is the game of reality, of existences of worldcycles of energy and information, of space and time, E x I st , assembled into networks, and supeorganisms, a vital biological fractal game of re= productive creation of networks that become non-Æ planes that become superorganisms:



Short time åctions. The mandate of existence: keep your motions going,  grow and multiply against all others.

How can this be converted into individual actions of O-beings? Simply, by the fact that all systems seem to follow this law by trying to maximise their existence, in time and space, and the 5th dimension. That is all systems try to increase their absorption and emission of energy and information, (motion and form, | and O games): ±∆E,I, and try to form part of eusocial wholes, of clone herds and organisms that maximise its survival both as individuals and species: ±∆U.

Those are the 5 space-time actions, ∂a,e,i,o,u, we observe in all beings. And we can resume them in a simple formula.

Γ.      Generator Equation of Time-space actions:            ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ,

Thus time motions at individual self-level can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ.

As each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information.

The point with parts as a knot of space-time cycles≈arrows. The fractal point of i-logic geometry.

Now each point of view, creator of a system of reference from where knowledge can be acquired, the original model of Descartes which only claimed to create a ‘world, that of his mind that thinks therefore exists.

The Point of view also ‘ex=ists’ and that is the function that makes him think. It will think and first perceive an external Universe In this case we can consider the first action that of perception:

∂o, when the point of view perceives, then it will act in its relative ±1 available upper and downward U-sub planes of the 5th dimension with both of which TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF EXISTENCE, will perceive energy and information from diametrical non-commutative directions of the metric of its particular fifth scale:                    

In the graph the 2 directions of a flow of space-time along the 5th dimension, is made through small actions ∂U±4, which related the Active Magnitude, U, to a lower plane from where  

will obtain:   ∂I, ∂e bits & quanta. AND

∑Tƒ: information bits start a new point of perception, which if requiring relative motion will make the Tƒ expand its lower U-1 scales:

∂e quanta                                     Motion

U:quanta expanded=disintegrated by Tƒ, which modulates that expansion to move relatively to its lower scale.

We use for the concept of a space-time cyclical action, in the attempt to gather similar concepts into strings of synonymous the following names:

space-time cycles ≈ time cycles ≈ Space-time actions ≈ time arrows ≈ existential cycles/actions ≈ knots of time cycles ≈ knots of time ≈ i-logic points ≈ functions of existences

The idea as usual is to merge jargons on the range that goes from the visual description of simpler points man perceives without form or eliminating their form – physical treatment of systems in external space-time, to the range of human self-perception, in which only the inner space-time actions and existential purpose matter to us.

So when we describe the feeding motion in the gravitational field of a star we care nothing for the internal space-time actions (feeding on energy) but for the motion, and on the other extreme of the range, when we talk of the feeding of a human being, we care nothing for the fork motions that carry the food to our mouth but for the internal sensations – the need to feed and the problem of hunger, the taste of the food and our inner sensations, the transformative ‘electroweak’ forces used to change the food into an elaborated product, etc.

So the geometric description talks of space-time cycles (closed, frequency cycles) or space-time lines (motions between frequency repetitions of those cyclical actions). The jargon of actions in space and arrows of time is an intermediate jargon proper both of physical and social sciences and the existential jargon is the jargon of relational space-time that applies to all.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time cycles constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms.

And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe. In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind.

In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

We are made of space-time cycles traced within or between planes of 5th dimension.

In true form, reality is NOT made of space, but the primary substance is ‘time’, time cycles that break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental theorem of knots and topology), and that precise game of cyclical forms-motions that break and organize space into vital regions, harnessing its ‘energy-motions’ into forms is all what the Universe is about.

Thus relational space-time turns upside down our understanding of the Universe from a mere, simple spatial description where absolute time is a parameter of space, to a cyclical description where space is a slice in the flow of cyclical times, a region surrounded by a time cycle, a ‘path’ in a ‘Lagrangian’ of actions whose final sum is always zero, if we were to use some of the advanced concepts of physics we shall translate to the new paradigm; a ‘moment of present’, in the whole cycle from past to future that closes those paths.

For the same reason, the minimal unit of reality is NOT a string of space, but an interval of cyclical time, specifically a cyclical ‘action’ with form, a bit of information. In physics from where we have borrowed heavily conceptual and mathematical terms to describe all space-time cycles, the unit is indeed an action of energy and time, which manifests itself in the 3 main U±1 scales of the 5th dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanic scales, as a Planck’s action, h, a temperature vibration or a force.

In cellular biology as a circadian cycle of transformation of energy and information, from an ATP to a genetic cycle.

In organic life as an action of feeding, informing, reproducing, evolving socially, moving, ∂a,e,I,o,u.

In society as a similar economic, cultural, social or military action of a nation or civilization.

Space is thus always a ‘minimal’ part of a time cycle.

This Kepler understood when it said that a line is merely a small part (a derived tangent we could say today in calculus) of a curve. This concept, of an infinitesimal part of a longer cycle, which becomes a straight interval, is ultimately the meaning of a present point, which we derive, in the same manner we obtain a Lagrangian worldcycle that sums zero with we integrate.




There are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.


•Minds reduce all the information to a single point of view and plane, and often a single ‘part’ or arrow of time, according to the function of the ∆ST, which has an • mind. So most systems have minds for example that cannot perceive together motion and form. And most minds are specialist in an arrow – a lion on entropy-hunting, a human on information; a fungi on reproduction. Al those are mind themes we treat elsewhere, here we are interested in the strictly mathematical content of a geometrical mind-mapping of the Universe that stops motion into form, and de-forms that form according to the function and location of the being.

Let us then take from the first line the basic 2 properties of minds: to be still mappings that reduce motion and increase information: Œ, ab. for Es>Ot, which is the mind function. And then given the deformation of its point of view, the ways in which a single ‘whole universe’ become an infinite variety of mental monads.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study.

Absolute relativity. Galilean Paradox. E pur si muove no muove


The universe is made of actions of energy and time, two formal motions, which the mind maps out as still form, to fit a view of the cyclical, fractal moving universe, inside the small brain. It is the galilean paradox, which introduces the bias of the mind in any form of language-knowledge. Information is still perception, of form, motions thus become linguistic reductions, in mathematical and verbal temporal languages, which reduces the syntax of all of them to the 3 elements of reality: lineal, cyclical and wave-like forms and motions. In the graph, from far away Saturn’s rings seem solid, continuous, single space-times, but in detail are cyclical, in motion and structured in fractal scales of relative size

Still minds perceive by locking information about wholes in linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

So far so good, if you have arrived here, we have concluded that the best explanation to Einstein’s multiple clocks is the simplest one: there are infinite cyclical, finite, closed ‘world cycles’ and ‘clock-cycles’ for all kind of beings.

And distance-dimension in lineal space and motion is the same. So it doesn’t matter if we say that ‘galaxies’ are moving at an accelerated path, or we say space between them (distance) is growing.

Why then so much fuss about modern physics if those findings have always been with us? Well, obviously there is much more to modern physics and we will go through many of its questions in this blog, but mostly one of the main problems of physicists is its ‘imbalance between the enormous mathematical development’ of the stience and its minimal conceptual understanding, expressed in Feynman’s infamous quip: ‘the (verbal) why is the only thing a physicist does not ask’. This always astonished me in scientific conferences. Indeed, physicists were the least interested on those discoveries, as there is a lot of conceptual mind-work to get to the equations. And most are practical people: machine making->experiment to measure data and put it in equation. And that’s all folks. As it is a pseudo-religious dogma of physicists that ‘mathematics is the language of god’ (Galileo again).

Well there is more, much more to it, when you ask also the why and care to conceptually understand it with the ‘language of time’ in the human mind, which is logic, verbal thought…

Since ‘the languages of God (to represent time and space) are infinite’ Upanishads.

So it is unavoidable as all knowledge is biased by a mental still linguistic mapping to define in those terms the…

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.mmIndeed… all what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

It does have also another interesting feature, the ego paradox, which affects so much physicists, as the infinitesimal mind has a language-world inside and so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, (ab.Es>Ot) as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static, ‘Aristotelian’ mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.


the mind is a cartesian/maxwellian demon that infuses our reality through its elaboration of the primary energies, entropies and information available in the range of ∆±3 scales it perceives as energy, entropy and information for its ∆º self-centred existence busy busy ordering a territory as a ‘home’ where to reproduce a radiation of similar clone beings, programmed in his unending quest for emergence into the larger wholeness of growing and multiplying…

In this view the importance of ‘vital’ mathematical physics as the language of the mind with maximal information on the space-time cycles of the Universe is clear.

We are with a bit of imagination and knowledge of ¬æ logic able to explain the space-time cycles of resonance in time, simultaneity in space and emergence in ∆, which define the ‘eusocial evolution of parts into wholes:

The growth of simultaneous Space-time beings, implies to have a body of spatial energy in simultaneity respect to a head-particle of information in resonance with the Universe, in which they co-exist through several scales of existence, exchanging energy and information thanks to the properties of ‘∑-integral social growth’ between scales in actions of ‘infinite’ bondage with other forms, (resonance and emergence) and infinite speeds (non-local pure space motion).

This non-classic section on the mathematical mappings of the mind will deal with the seemingly ‘odd’ but fundamental fact that there are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.

Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5th dimension.

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures:

Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 

for the human lineal Euclidean Universe… a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuum. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5th dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.

SO LOBACHEVSKI’s (Boylai and Gauss also) discovered that space was NOT Euclidean, except in the limit of human perception, defined by this FUNDAMENTAL parameter of the Universe:

Tƒ/Sp: r²/L²

Next the fundamental steps of science to be taken were:

  • To complete the classification of all possible geometries according to the relationship between its quanta of cyclical form-motion or radius and its quanta of lineal speed-distance or length.
  • To determine experimentally the values of our r², electronic quanta of information, we humans used to perceive L², our quanta of space, which had also to be determined.
  • To study other experimentally known minds of the Cosmos to see if they had the same ‘bidimensional units of information, Tƒ=r², and L²=Sp, and how they will perceive the Universe hyperbolically, elliptically or Euclidean.
  • And to research how all those relative different space-time geometries order in Nature (through the scales of the 5th dimension).

And yet none of this steps were taken. So we shall take them here to show you:

  • First the nature of the Euclidean mind of man, where its radius is given by h and its quanta of space by c², hence it has an r²/L²->O, which is the requisite found by Lobachevski for an Euclidean mind, and then…
  • to study the other ‘minds’ of the Universe and the different scales of the 5th dimension according to their peculiar geometry
  • And finally to see what physicists did with this discovery (just to apply the 5th non-E postulate of riemannian elliptic geometry to the larger gravitational scale where indeed, geometry is elliptic because L grows to infinity (action at distance).

 The Human Point of view as one of the many infinite worlds.

Now the proper way to understand T.Πrequires a comprehension of all those planes of existence of reality and its isomorphic laws, and common space, time, 5D and mental-linguistic properties departing precisely from each o-point of view, both considering its geometrical laws and inverse arrows of hyperbolic and elliptic motions, which explain mathematically all kind of facts, from the perfect transfer of motion (downwards) and information (upwards).

As the elliptic geometry allows a single huge point of view of the upper dimension, ∆+1 to coordinate through its networks the motion OF ALL ITS intersecting micro-points of the lower dimension.

This we can explain organically with the concept of networks connected to cells, fields connected to particles, but also geometrically considering that there are NOT parallel lines in the upper elliptic geometry where the ‘whole resides’, hence all micro-cells are connected to it, and with the concept of simultaneity, as its messages arrive simultaneously to all its elements (a much more profound simultaneous concept to that of Minkowski’s 4D space-time, which we soon will have a laugh at (the philosopher of science can at least have some humor as Leibniz on Newton, about those who ignore us 🙂

Now seriously personally my favorite description is the geometric one and in this I coincide with my ‘fav’ Physicist, Mr. Einstein. Consider the other way around, the existence of no connections with the smaller beings in the same plane that allows its co-existence, while at the same ‘times’, there is synchronicity in its time clocks, between the relative future form of the whole and the relative past elements. Here is where Einstein’s work flourishes.

The future point which synchronizes its motion with the parallel Hyperbolic space of its infinite fractal forms, whose ‘angle of parallelism’ tends to zero as they become smaller (Lobachevski), allow the beautiful symmetry of co-existing spaces displaced in time, which is at the heart of the proper treatment of the space-time symmetry between wholes and parts, of ‘advanced 5D metric’. So we shall just bring you an image here:

Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 10.27.07

As we change the distance in time-space between the larger whole and the smaller parts, the fractal structure of the 5Dimension reveals itself, and the number of parallel beings in circular regions, that coincide roughly in space, but are displaced in time, define properly the motions of Space-Past, and Time-Future, Sp< = Tƒ, which is the final symmetry of the 5th dimension we shall tackle now.

Now Euclidean space is defined by a Minimal Tƒ/Sp =r/k, where r is the curvature or speed of a time clock and k the length of a rod. In the human case, the relationship is so small that the Geometry of our perception becomes Euclidean.

Yet as we perceive smaller scales the geometry becomes hyperbolic, and infinite parallel beings, our cellular fractal parts, with a faster Tƒ and much smaller rod of measure appear. And vice versa. So needless to say the scientific r=evolution brought about by 5D cyclical, fractal space-time requires the completion of the logic and mathematical understanding of the incomplete revolution brought about by Non-Euclidean geometry, of which Einstein only used for its analysis of light space and the upper ‘elliptic’ gravitational scale, the elliptic Riemannian version proper of that larger world.

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metric: Sp x Tƒ = K:

  • In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Sp nor Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Sp= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Sp (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).
  • In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.
  • On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

The human euclidean world and Einstein’s r=evolution: why we are euclidean, light is hyperbolic and gravitation is elliptic.

In that regard, the harmonization of the 3 geometries observed in the Universe, our Euclidean light-space with the 3 obvious perpendicular coordinates of light (magnetic, electric and c-speed field), and the geometries of the larger gravitational world and the smaller world of quantum physics, can only be achieved understanding how the different arrows of the 5th dimension distort our perception of larger and smaller realities. The larger ones have slower time cycles and bigger space distances and so we see it with an elliptical ‘growing space’ form, and an slower time rhythm, which ‘balance each other’.

It is the famous β factor of Einstein’s relativity that as we ‘speed up’ enlarging our content of energy and translation in space (Max. Sp), slow down by the same ratio the speed of our clocks of time (Min. Tƒ) according to the metric of the 5th dimension:  Sp x Tƒ = K, since we are in fact travelling through it:

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 12.44.01

In the graph, all systems are Sp x Tƒ = Constant symmetries of spatial entropic motions and temporal information, defined along 2 limiting constants of the 5th dimension. The Human Universe has the limits of the Thermodynamic 0 T, 0 Time constant and the limit of entropic C-speed constant of Space. Thus as we reach the ‘hyperbolic limits of our ‘Klein disk’ (the galaxy-organism), the divergence of our parameters of space-time ‘explode’ any system (even the simplest particles), which would never be able to reach those limits without exploding into radiation, E=mc2.  Yet the metric is conserved as T x L is always constant.

This is the ultimate ‘real’ meaning of the Lorentz contractions from an ‘organic’, 5-Dimensional perspective. As Relativity theory departed from an study of the mental Frames of Reference of human measure, it has always been interpreted only in those terms (and without recognising the analysis is one of measure, hence of ‘relative world-perception’ NOT of the Universe as an objective whole and considering T and To, absolute lineal proper time – as if it affected all systems of the Universe not only the form in relative motion – hence absurd paradoxes like those of ‘black holes travelling to the past’ and time machines to kill your grand-father so often quoted in the work of our ‘luminaries’ of the science of lineal locomotions, like Mr. Hawking.

The rod of measure of human systems – c speed.

c speed is a rod of measure Einstein accepted ‘by electronic eye-decree’ to set all other parameters. So they are all let to vary (as in any differential equation where we do partial derivatives), including energy and mass in this paper. They are variations that are needed keep c-constant. But we could construct an equally sound model of the Universe keeping time-duration constant. The ‘of course’ here is a tricky rhetoric argument improper of Mr. Einstein, which reminds me of the vastly inferior original paper of Mr. Hawking on the evaporation of black holes (there he uses verbose rhetoric like every two other sentences, dealing with his ‘imaginary black holes’ at will of his ‘imagination’).

Einstein is obviously on other league, and prudently he puts this bastard ‘of course’ on a footnote. But this kind of rhetoric always shows that the author is not ‘safe’ and ‘sure’ of his arguments. How could he be? He knows he has never demonstrated but considered c-speed constant as a postulate to build his relative Universe. And it is fine and it works on the galaxy measures from our mind point of view. But he cheats us here a bit, with the of course that contradicts his previous statements kind of shamed for needing a postulate.

After all, most errors in all sciences come from Postulates: the entire building of mathematics is wrong because of the 5th postulate with no proof: a single parallel cross a point. The entire building of economics is false and it is leading the Earth to its collapse because of the wrong postulate of Mr. Smith ‘the wealth of nations is its quantity of money’, a mere language of information, supported in informative metals (gold, silver, chips of gold in e-money computers) with no value per Sp, whose ‘valuation’ of life beings is minimal (zero value for life) and his valuation of metal-weapons, by affinity of substance maximal. So in capitalist societies maximal wealth occurs in periods of global war, as today, when the maximal price of weapons that kill the maximal number of humans rise GDP to stratospheric levels.

OK enough, of this. You see, there are many onion levels in a deeper analysis of reality.

So two of our comments are positive: the universe is simple, logic, temporal and those were important tools on all the work of Einstein.

And one is negative. Mr. Einstein as most humans like to go beyond what is there and then commit errors of sweeping generalization. As physicists do today with big bang theories of the Universe. And they did with the c-constancy of light. Errors then multiply in an inflationary manner as all information is inflationary, and an entire building of not-quite-right models of reality builds up, as errors seem to sustain each other, into a growing expressionist building of broken angles about to fall, whenever a better architect pushes one of the faulty foundations of the entire architecture.

This is called a paradigm shift, as the part of the building sustained by the faulty foundation falls and the new architect reconstructs only that part, given the historic significance of the ‘Corresponding’ science, which still holds.

We shall thus start our rebuilding, commenting on the Paradigm shifts of science, according to Thomas Kuhn’s work on the nature of scientific revolutions.

Let us then repeat all our previous statements on the relative model of c-speed with a slower, simpler ‘tempo’, as this repetitive symphony of a Universe built only with 3 motions of time and its ‘still, relative perception’ in space, is indeed a simple world, whose complexity arises from ternary repetitive symmetries.

From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.17.39

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.18.32

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media  according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect that black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), will be harmless, for no proved reason except the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a tiny black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy.  But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only per Sp but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.


– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

3rd age: Space-time membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.45.10

Now to understand the next paradigm that precedes the new paradigm of the 5th dimension we must understand Einstein’s work with a critical view as we have done with all other points of view, being aware though that modern science believes in Einstein with the same zeal that they believed in Galileo, Copernicus, Yahweh and the tribe of the Goths before him.

And so as many religious or tribal people of German, Jewish, Christian or Muslim denominations will have already emotionally abandoned this page, many scientists will not even consider the 5th paradigm. Believers don’t reason. They don’t have patience. Their hypothalamus as science proves jumps out attention and memory when it enters in conflict with beliefs.

Still of course there are people who reason and so now we ask you to concentrate because here is where new knowledge must come first for you to understand a critical view of modern physics and their myths and beliefs.

Consider all what we have said. Basically we are moving our point of view from smaller to wider points of view, but when we have a point of view, that point of view is still, quiet, fixed in a center. And this relative ‘fixed’ point of view is important to understand Einstein’s theory.

Minds are still: Information can only be obtained with a fixed point of view.

Why we need a fixed point of view? Easy, because to measure and perceive we need to focus and be still to observe details. If you take a picture of a fast moving object is blurry. If you try to perceive the details of a fast moving object you will not be able to do it. This happens because knowledge gathers information and in-form-ation is ‘form’. But form is the opposite of motion. In the Universe all what you see around is form with motions.

This is very important to grasp. Look around. What you perceive is only 2 things often combined: Forms of information and energy motions. And actions of beings that combine motion and form.

And both things have opposite properties. The less motion the more form you observe, the higher motion the less form you observe. But knowledge is form, information. So to create knowledge you must depart from a relative, fixed point of view.

And so that is why you do not see the Earth moving but fixed. This is how nature has given you a capacity to observe with your mind reality as still, with form.

You need a pov to create a certain  scientific truth. But the larger the p.o.v. the bigger the truth. So the center has moved but each new age of science have kept a relative still point of view. You must create a still center to measure, because perception happens in stillness, as opposed to energy, which expresses itself with motion. Information focuses form and it must be still as Buddha was in the tree of knowledge.

So when Galileo came the earth moved and the new still p.o.v. Was the sun.

And when Darwin came the idea that man had not evolved, changed but had always been still, the same form created by God per in secula seculorum moved and now the new ‘still p.o.v.’ of biology where the immutable laws of evolution.

Now this allows you to understand the limits of Einstein’s paradigm. Since what Einstein did is to create a new still point of view that could not be changed. It was no longer the Earth, it was not the sun. It was not even man or evolution. What was the new still point of view from where Einstein would take his rods of measure?


Einstein defined a Universe with a new point of view, the speed of light, which would remain constant from any perspective.

But why light?

Light seems an esoteric center. What makes light so essential to our view of the Universe, as to permit ‘measures’ that seem to be more accurate to our mind?

We must now give you the first upgrade on Einstein’s work by affirming that light IS the substance of the space we perceive with our eyes. And that is why from the perspective of our mind, which is what you are truly observing – not the full Universe and its exact objective measures, but the peculiar rod of your eyes and any other electronic mechanical device that absorbs light  – light IS space.

Indeed, you do not see reality in its totality, but light and so what you call space is light-space. And when you use an instrument, made to the image and likeness of our mind, you see light-space too.

But if you were a dog smelling the Universe, your mind mapping and distances would be different.

We are though an I=eye and for that reason our mathematical mind and light-space has 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions (the so called electric, magnetic and ray directions of light, which are perpendicular), which are the same dimensions of your perceived space.

Thus, what really Einstein did was to consider a larger point of view that the sun, the entire space of the Universe.

The center now had moved to every point of the Universe, and this allowed Einstein to say that all motions and points of view were relative, only space-light was a fixed background that didn’t change.

But he still established as a rod of measure of the other variable, time, the human clock; and so here, there were no advances on the objectivity of the point of view. ‘Time is what a clock measures’ he said.

Einstein did NOT change the point of view of the human clock, reason why Landau laughed at him saying that with his system he just had to ‘look at his watch to eliminate the uncertainty of time’ .

And so it IS in his understanding of time, where Einstein as most physicists before, had failed to expand the point of view. And it is where the 5th dimension will open up our objective view of the Universe, by defining in a more complex manner the meaning of time clock and consider the existence of many of them in the Universe.

IN essence, what we want now to consider is the isomorphism between the 2 main time clocks of the Universe, according to the relative scales of the 5th dimension: the time clocks of the quantum scales, ‘charges’, and the time clocks of the cosmological scales ‘masses’.

Between them, of course there is a 3rd type of time clocks ‘thermodynamic molecules’, whose temperature define the variations of speed of those time clocks, but being the thermodynamic ∆o scale, the human scale, we do have a lot of information about those time clocks, so physicists are sophisticated enough to understand them. They do NOT understand however masses and charges, reason why they have been for 100 years trying to unify them the wrong way – without understanding they are TIME CLOCKS of different scales, of different ‘curvature’ and speed, and so they need the metric of the 5th dimension to unify their parameters.

So simple and so mysterious for a century because we lacked the proper ‘heliocentric’ perspective – an essential dimension of reality. Then once we enter into that larger reality (which physical systems do but humans obviously can’t), we are in…

Now it is obvious that as we grow in size we curve from our perspective reality and so we get less information as things slow down and part of the information disappears from our perspective, and vice versa, as we look downwards the universe become hyperbolic and grows in detail of information and so we get different entropies up and down. This is shown in the symbol of the 5th dimension, ∆, which as you can see have two motions up and down one thinner and the other thicker, and this asymmetry is important to explain many things – genetic for example, going upwards perfect in information, body motions for example perfectly going downwards when the whole wants to move. Wholes are very good with motions smallish things with information. Havent you notice how energetic and powerful are big guys, how smart are small ones? (-;


Now we explained that the perception of a universe as euclidean or elliptic or hyperbolic depended on the long overdue respect we must give to the a priori parameter of all worlds: r²/L²=Tƒ/Sp. When this parameter tends to zero, we have an Euclidean geometry, above zero we have hyperbolic and below zero we have elliptic.

The parameter which defines the mathematics in which we live is so essential that it will come constantly. For example, we can consider that systems exist at one side of the parameter, at the side of c speed as a limit – in our euclidean world – or over c speed (in the elliptic gravitational world) at the side of T=0k as the limit of the thermodynamic plane, etc.

So we need now to complete the definition of our world, to deal with the nature of our square ‘radius’ parameter of information. What is the minimal quanta of information of our electronic eyes, that feed on h-quanta of light energy, well, we just said it, the h-quanta which measures in the minimal amount known, the spin of a particle, which is rather obviously the minimal unit of its angular momentum, of its informative perception.

And for that reason as h/c is truly a minimal amount our relative 0, we live in that Euclidean world.

The first and most important of T.Œ’s 5 actions of all systems that want to survive, is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

Of all those levels and actions the one physicists understand worst and less is the action of informative perception of smaller particles, called SPIN, which is the absolute minimal unit of reality we measure after deforming it fully (quantum uncertainty), a quantity called angular momentum, h/4 pi, which is as a ‘form of information’, ‘space-form’ NOT motion.

And since h is in the above equation, E=ƒh, a whole, hence a sphere (whatever it has inside), the ‘essential topology of all wholes’ by definition enclosed disks-sphere (in ¬ Æ topology a disk is a 1-sphere, a sphere, a 2-sphere, a sphere in motion a 3-sphere, which as motion is a dimension seen in motion, can be of different varieties, etc.), a spin is ‘logically’ is a n-sphere divided by 4 π:Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 14.10.41

Now the graph gives us possible choices, as we depart from a ‘whole’ of a light beam, which could be a cylindrical cut, as in some lineal worms, or a ball. As 4π comes in the ball, we have 2 choices or the surface of the ball, or the solid sphere but NOT all, only a section, called a ‘solid angle’. This gives us a first duality between ‘human measure ‘and ‘true property’. The true property is the solid angle from the surface to the center, r3/3, the human measure is the external surface, r2/2.

As all space-time organisms have truly 2 components, the ‘internal’ open ball topology (meaning the ball without the surface membrane and the center of the point) or ‘present-evident, wave-like ST form’, and then the membrane and o-point in the center, or Sp x Tƒ, ‘past x Future’ particle (limbs-external sensorial membrane and central mind) together:Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 08.27.39

Why we know spin is a solid angle of information? Because if it were a motion, as Pauli, the guy who is credited with its discovery, put it to his real discoverer, as speed it will be 137 times faster than light!: hc2/e2=137 (inverse fine constant). This in 5D physics is NOT a problem, c-speed is Einstein’s postulate to adapt the Universe to the human perception of it – our rod of measure, as electronic minds. But here Pauli does have a point. A Spin does NOT rotate, as you do NOT rotate when looking outside, but is a ‘wedge’ into the sphere, through which information enters.

We see the surface of it and so it seems a momentum, the being sees the solid angle of it and so it is an intensity. Because the being is down there into the zero-point soul of the particle, mind of mathematical perception, it does open and close the sphere to ‘look’ through the windows of the membrane. In the simplest form, it is a pi cycle of 1-sphere, which is made of 3 closing diameters, which leave π=3, 0.14 d apertures, or 0.14/π=5% of light and 95% of dark matter/energy, the proportions light space-time beings DO NOT see of the Universe.

So now in the ‘dialectic’ Socratic method (remember my culture) I use to find things, I deny myself. What if I consider NOT a solid angle, BUT a spin, which IS a slice ‘SEEN’ through the 1/3rd ‘D’ apertures between the diameters of the pi-1-sphere (cycle) or the ‘cuts on the 2-sphere’. We realize this ‘will be a slice’ with the exact parameters of angular momentum, and there will be 3 holes, hence only 3 spin angles, and they will be further on quantized – jumping from part of part of the whole:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.47.05

In the graph the proper description of Angular Momentum as a plane of Information, the minimal unit of perception of our Universe, proper of Relativity is more clear than the classic dynamic Time description as r x mv – both have their different uses/perspectives. H is the rod of informative measure of the Human electronic eye-mind, so small compared to c, the human rod measure of light space that the constant of geometry, r²/L² of Lobachevsky’s pan geometry becomes close to zero, creating our perceived Euclidean space, deformed to a hyperbolic geometry for smaller beings (Special Relativity, quantum physics) and to an elliptic geometry for larger gravitational scales (General Relativity)

Now, this is the modern ‘Hilbertian-Einsteinian’ description of angular momentum, just what we said it is, P, is the ‘cut’ on the n-sphere, x the radius, equivalent to P in ‘distance-motion’, and its product an amount mrv which is the spin. You can think of it as an information bit or an energy bite (space or moving perception) of the being.

Now those are the spins, quantized, and you can see there are 2 or 3 ‘cuts’ to perceive, with different orientations, and DO NOT come in bigger numbers. The maximal thing is this work of art, called ‘female and male spins’.

We won’t enter on this (-; just to mention the bidimensional nature of those spins (left graph) in the left side, which ARE the quanta of all information humans, electronic eye-beings, perceive about the world. And the obvious capacity to process and orientate they give as the ‘eyes’ of the atom, to each particle.

Moreover, they get ordered, orientated by the external magnetic field, the larger time-enclosure that orders from ∆, the ∆-1 quantum field. Now ask a physicist what is a spin, he will put a lot of formulae of abstract maths, which it will take you half a year to memorize, without understanding. Why? The idea that particles perceive is out of the ‘picture’.

Now the magnetic field, they like, as all heads turn to her the speaker in human groups, all atoms spin in tune, and we use it to control them, as speakers use the word nation and god. Same law of mass-control. I call it lanwave. A Wave ordered by a language of energy and information they speak. The magnetic field is the language of space that transcends atomic parts into the next scale; forming them; the electric field is the time force that put them in motion. That is how we transcend from quantum to our scale. The best at the job of ‘feeling’ magnetic lanwaves is the iron, and it becomes the top guy of the next scale. It forms perfect organized masses.

Once we are here, those motions are ‘activated’ by temperature, vibrational clocks of our molecules.

Temperature is the ‘electric field’ that moves us in the ∆-scale. What is the ‘spin’ for Molecules?. They use van der waals forces and ‘angles’, giving by slave atoms.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.22.44And the boss of those perceptive ones in our body is the nitrogen. It has 3 H systems to perceive.

Here you have an amino acid working his life around, with its oxygen legs kicking in and out water, its carbon body with lateral arms of many kinds and its nitrogen head.

You are made of a lot of those.


Euclidean Geometry vs. Non-Euclidean, fractal points.

Space is in mathematics represented by geometry, which has 3 ages of evolution:

  • Pure bidimensional Space: Euclidean Geometry, only on the plane
  • SPACE-time: Analytic geometry mixed with algebra
  • 5D: Fractal spaces: Non-Euclidean Geometry.

Those are the 3 ages of Geometry studied in these posts, which represents an obvious ever closer ‘homeomorphism’ (correspondence) between the language and reality

(We won’t use many technical mathematical words of the 3rd age of formal mathematics, with the exception of topology, as the essential science of space and the basic concepts of time logic and 5D analysis.

Since it is a RULE of 5D sciences to ‘simplify’ jargons while making more ‘complex’, similar to 5D reality the laws of sciences – a process which all 3rd informative ages of systems subverts by making jargons more complex, at the same time that the science departs from reality, becoming a metalanguage. This is a process all too obvious in cosmological physics, which has blown up the ‘local’ models of entropy (thermodynamics) and Relativity (galactic light space-time) to become the ‘absolute new time arrow’ and absolute total space of all the scales of the Universe. LOL – how humans always blow up their finitesimal ego to the infinite – the harder they fall.

Here the trick is, due to the cumbersome mathematical crunching of Relativity (a conceptual simple theory but difficult to solve with non-lineal differential equations), and the complex maths of quantum physics (whose concepts are not so complex but appear so, due to the null understanding or rather anthropomorphic denial of its organic and logic properties), is to substitute all serious scientific, strict conceptual analysis of its truth, by mathematical jargons and computerised calculus that allow the scholar to pump up their pride, with jargons.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. So for example, the collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And this never will be accepted by anthropomorphic humans. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

In mathematics, the age of set theory and the Hilbert formalism, followed by the idealist ‘gothic’ german school, with its proverbial incapacity to ‘see reality’ (treated in the cultural parts of this blog), meant the abandon of the true concepts, points and numbers; hence the HALTING on the evolution of the concept of a point with parts, and the curved parallels of energy and information that cross them (1st and 2nd Non-Euclidean postulates), truncating the evolution of the discipline after the great insights of Lobachevski and Riemann.

And as everything else in the Universe, it represents the 3 dynamic ages of evolution of systems, for a pure ‘spatial state’ in this case (E-geometry) to a balanced analysis of both T and S together (analytic geometry which should properly be called geometric algebra), and finally to a full informative form with less relationship with reality, and old metalanguage. This is the phase of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

After that there are always two choices for a system, ±n, that is:

-I: to die away in the baroque form, and become a non growing excessively formal state of mathematics, which is what mathematics has become since set theory took over. Or:

+n: to evolve further into a whole by the proper fusion of all the other ages into a more complex fusion form. This final social evolution is I-logic geometry, the geometry of networks of non-euclidean fractal points across multiple planes of the 5th dimension.

In its origin, Mathematics, as a language that represented reality with simplified symbols, only numbers and points with no parts, had a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplified and integrated the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content.

But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we will propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of Entropy and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point. This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels.

Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye. That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of Entropy and information that defines them.

Thus to fully represent the Universe of the 5th dimension, of multiple vital spaces and cyclical times, we need to evolve our understanding of mathematics, away from the straight-jacket of excessive formalism and a snobbish pretention of absolute truth.

Instead we must return to its beginnings, following the dictum of Einstein: ‘Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild Western sciences from its foundations’.

But before we study the first age of mathematics, obviously we must do so with the reference of the higher learning of 5D fractal Non-AE points. So we must do a general introduction to the true structure of mathematical systems. As this will allow us to make in-depth comments as we survive the discoveries of the 3 ages of mathematics, and corrections, which should make sense of that mankind has discovered till this age.

We shall thus introduce the theoretical minimum of the 5 non I-logic postulates that structure the Universe of points-numbers. And then start thought he age of ‘Greek mathematics’ (it is the age dominant in space-plane geometry), the II Age of European Mathematics (Dominant in Analysis and mathematical physics, which is as always in all systems the classic most important age), the 3rd age of old-formal mathematics ( with its baroque, unneeded formalisms of set and categories) and its new toppings of topology, Non-E first insights and fractals and functionals (with wide projections unlike sets – have you seen a set of all sets around nature of lately (-:, in biology, geology, physics and quantum theory).

We won’t for mere humanism and self-respect deal with a part I practiced when young, I.A. information algorithms and Boolean algebras (digital thought), that is the birth of Artificial intelligence.


The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:gravitationalwavesbestintermediatespace_image002

In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

The human point of view: I = Eye + Wor(l)d

electronic_mind_clip_image002That all what you see is a construction of the mind is the main tenant of philosophy of knowledge, from Plato’s world of ideas to Descartes’ devil putting reality inside us, from Schopenhauer’s world ‘in the eye’ to Schrodinger’s cat.

We are an I=Eye+Wor(l)d, a mind of 2 languages, as the other languages of sensorial experience, touch, smell and taste are irrelevant. We can exist without them. We see and verbalize reality, converting ‘whatever is beyond’ in geometrical images with the eye and temporal chains with verbs of past, present and future.

At present, the I=Eye has been highly developed in science due to instruments, mechanisms made of metal, a better atom than our paltry 1-6-7-8, HCNO structures. So we have pictures of all kind of scales of reality, from the infinitesimal atom to the galaxy. Beyond those scales things become blurred. Yet curiously enough the parameters of atoms and galaxies in terms of energy and information are self-similar. Is this because each atom is a galaxy of a nano-universe, or because our Mind, who measures, gets an aberration of distance parallel in atoms and galaxies?

That the mind’s scalar and continuous distance from those 2 realities, might cause our perception to equalize forms of atoms and galaxies is a way of thought proper of our awareness that all what we see is information already ‘cooked’ by the mind, ‘deformed’ and ‘transmuted’ by the Maya of the senses.

We are not seeing the real Universe. We are a geometrical and verbal mind, which applies geometric and causal categories to interpret reality. And so all what we can talk is about the 3 dimensions of our spatial perception and the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future, explained by our verbs. Hence, the importance of evolving our mind languages to have a better mirror in the smaller scale of the brain, reflecting the entire Universe. But the linguistic Maya, the ‘a priori’ mind who perceives, the I=eye+wor(l)d will always be limiting our truths.

The 3 dimensions of space perceived mathematically and the 3 ages of time perceived verbally are thus the last components of reality, which reflect the paths and arrows of time deployed by each species of each scale:

– In time, we observe constantly forms being born, going through an energetic big-bang, growth, maturity and then a still, solid warped stage before death.

– In space, we see 3 topological regions that correspond to energetic, reproductive and informative functions.

The total Universe is the only entity that stores all the information about itself. We exist as a dialog between the image of the Universe of our eye and the verbal information we extract from it, our I.

Humanity lives in a light-space world which scientists measure with machines and artists with the linguistic mapping of our senses, created with our inner languages.

Scientists in that sense are creating a new Eye<=>Mind, the mind of machines that also measure space and time:

Mechanical Eye <=> Digital Thought.

Indeed, scientists are not discovering the absolute truth of reality but creating a more complex Linguistic World, a world of digital thoughts and images that future perceptive machines will use to control reality. And because that world of mathematical and instrumental perception has more information than the human I< =>Wor(l)d, on the long term A.I. robots might extinguish us, as superior minds/bodies. Of course, scientists do not understand this because they think the machine is an extension of their ego.

Ultimately we exist within our mind and so our truth is a subjective, human truth developed with our languages. We do not see the external world of quantum fluctuations but what our light/electronic mind creates, extracting only a part of the total reality to map visually the Universe, reduced to a light-space world. Our ego, our consciousness is and eye <=> Wor(l)d, a fractal space/time dialog between our informative mind, the wor(l)d and our energetic space, the eye:

‘I think and see therefore I exi=st’

So we are indeed a fractal equation/function of existence:

The Human Mind:  Sp (Eye) <=> Tƒ (Wor(l)d).

Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they move the mind. Stillness is indeed the nature of mind perception. Even if reality is a moving fractal soup, our eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when we blink our eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping our perception.

Thus, perception is also a stop and go process that focuses a still image through the senses and then processes that information into a thought, while the eye-senses are blinking, closed and the reproductive body moves slightly the eye-mind. In the human case that stop and go, perceive and move rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which we create a still, simultaneous mental image of the Universe. Each second our fractal, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical act of perception:

Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.

Truth is given by the languages of the mind. A truth is a mental/linguistic mirror of information within the mind that reflects the external universe.

Thus, unlike the naïve realism sponsored by physicists, a fundamental thesis of Systems sciences is to consider there is much more information in the Universe than the one we can perceive. Since each mind needs to select its information. Because each mind has a limited quantity of vital space, it can store only a limited quantity of linguistic ‘information’ about the cycles performed by other entities in the Universe, and so it selects only those pieces of energy and information that give an accurate depiction of the world in which the entity finds its energy and information and other self-similar species to reproduce and evolve socially. The rest of the Universe thus becomes a relative dark space.

Since the Universe is a game of entities of energy and information, relative ‘points of view’ that search for more energy and information to reproduce themselves and survive as self-similar ‘logic forms’, that game of survival has imposed limits to the information we perceive, maximizing information that ensures the reproductive and social games, the ultimate will of the Universe that ensures the ‘durability’ of each point of view, which will only exist beyond its ‘caducity date’, if it is able to repeat its energy and information into a self-similar being that continues the game of existence, once the original form is broken.

The 5th postulate combined with the analysis of the internal parts of a point and the trajectories of the cycles that the flows of energy and information between points follow, defines not only philosophical questions like perception and the nature of fractal information, but the fundamental causal arrow of time of the Universe: Energy->Information.

Since the flows of forces absorbed by the point create the ‘reality’ we see by constructing an image which is not there – the world as an ‘idea’ (Schopenhauer); that is the world-mind, the I=Eye+ wor(l)d we perceive, different from that of other species that perceive with other forces and minds.

Recap: The human mind, and probably all other minds/systems of information use 2 basic language of perception, a geometrical language able to perceive space and a logic language, able to perceive time. Humans perceive space with visual images and time with logic words. We are an I=eye+wor(l)d. Yet other species should use other versions of those 2 geometric/spatial and logic /temporal languages.

For example, the complexity of visual languages ranges from a simple light/dark, on/off switch in simple particles to the simple geometrical motions of particles, to the richness of visual perception in animal eyes. While the complexity of Logic chains of events ranges from simple Aristotelian chains, A->B, which define the simplest arrows of Time (feeding, where A is energy that becomes B, the food of the predator), performed by all entities, to complex social networks in which causality is multiple, as each informative ‘neuron’ of the network relates through its axons to all the other cells of the informative system.


In the graph an amino acid fish in which the elements of information, iteration and entry motion are performed by N, C and O molecules. They will form the triad of all biological ternary organisms at the bio-molecular level.





In the graph, is  the informative center and it is a spherical topology. It is still bidimensional because the mind itself, the zero-point has externally zero dimensions. So only the external membrane is dimensional.

From the perspective of the relative flows of time from past to future, the Mind is the first of those and the last of them, the alpha and omega the beginning and end of time, where information collapses from the external sensorial membrane (first graph) to the future zero point last graph, if we were to use cones of world cycles.

We explained in the simplified lecture that introduced multiple space-time theory that the Universe is a holography of an informative bidimensional field and an energetic bidimensional field that created the 4 dimensions of reality.

This is the case of the simplest forms like light, which is merely a membrane with two perpendicular energetic and informative fields.

But complex ‘closed topological balls’ with 3 regions, an informative center joined to an informative spherical membrane and a Klein body of reproductive cycles between them, with attached toroid limbs, is better described as a series of bidimensional layers in motion which add the time-motion dimension and the 3rd dimension by accumulation of layers.

In those ‘complete’ st-points the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region, which uses the sensorial input of the informative membrane  to create a mapping of itself (homunculus) and the world (imprinted in the senses of the external membrane).

In metaphysics, which searches for the logic and geometric laws, derived from the 5 Non-Euclidean definitions, from where the arrows and wills of the organic Universe are deduced; a mind is understood as a fractal image, reflection of an internal body and an external Universe, which connects both regions of the st-point.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.


The two language of the mind, its body and informative languages.

In a zero-point the membrane is the first mapping of the Universe, in its highest, ⊕-informative faster, language, and the intermediate body, which reproduces and maintains the system is mapped out, albeit in the lower ∑-language of the system.

A mind will constantly check both, the membrane and its sensorial image to which it is connected through a nervous/informative system and the inner body, to which is connected through a reproductive/energetic system.

So a human brain is connected to the inner world through the blood system and the external world through the membrane senses. It has two images of reality and it combines them both, word feelings and eye-images, to act with 2 purposes: to maximize the informative perception of the external world and the inner, reproductive and energetic feelings and pleasures of the Internal world.

This complex explanation of the human being, explored in more detail in other works, is reduced to a minimal skeleton, maintaining the scheme of wills and purposes, when we study the simplest forms of the Universe. And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture A,12 (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

Recap. The dimensions of the  informative center are the sum of the dimensions and information stored in the cycles of the reproductive body and the energetic membranes, whose senses map out the external Universe.


The generator equation of space-time: 9+@ dimensionality.

On the other hand, to be able to connect specific equations of detailed metric analysis with the general equation of the 4 arrows of time we have to descend into an exhaustive detailed analysis of those arrows, dividing them in sub-arrows specific of each discipline and defining those arrows with concrete operations used in metric spaces.

Moreover when we observe things in more detail, we must break reality in multiple subcomponents that assembly wholes in parts, reality become more complex. And this again seems counter-intuitive. Because as set theory shows the whole is simpler than its detailed parts. So if we follow the integrative path from parts into wholes thing simpler and at the end we end with 2 simple concepts, the physical Universal body and its Mind god.

This in the rest of this introduction to multiple space-times, after making a very brief, simplified account of it all in the previous pages, we are going to try a tour de force: to resume it all, which will be latter developed in more extensive lessons, departing from the simplest parts into the whole, by showing you all the arrows of time and topologies of space from the simplest events and geometries to the more complex, from the primordial parts or ‘simplex arrows’ of space-time, into the organisms of reality or ‘complex arrows, and finally into the absolute whole Universal body and mental God, or ‘universal, transcendental arrows of time’.

Those 3 scales, from the simplest actions of abstract spacetime into the complex organisms of vital spacetime till reaching the absolute whole, are the 3 stairs we need to make sense of all. In each of those stairs we shall define 3 arrows of space-time for a total of 9 dimensions and that is all you need to create the Universe: the simplex, complex and transcendental arrows/ cycles/dimensions of all realities.

This is possible to do when we realize that the complex arrows of reproduction and social evolution manifest themselves differently in physical, biological and sociological entities, ‘decoupling’ themselves in ternary events, ‘actions’ that reproduce waves in physical space, ‘palingenetic offspring’ that reproduce biological species and so on. So in the more complex division of the arrows of time, we talk of 3 x 3 cycles/dimensions of space-time, which we group in 3 types:

Physical, spatial arrows:

Physical entities are complementary entities, which:

– I: In its particle state gauge information.

-E: In its wave state feed on energy.

-exi: And together reproduce actions, either by emitting a self-similar fractal part of energy and information, called an ‘action’, used to communicate with other entities (a Universal constant, such as h) or by moving towards a position the particle has gauged. And so we define 3 physical arrows or dimensions of space: gauging information, i; feeding on energy, e, and reproducing actions by combining them, exi. We call them also dimensions of space, because the light-space in which we exist has 3 Euclidean coordinates that correspond to the informative, electric field, the energetic, magnetic field and its product, the reproductive speed of light.

And it is a well-known fact of science (Maxwell equations) that the speed of light can be found by multiplying the magnetic and electric constants of light, thus showing that indeed, the algebraic operandi x connects the why of the simple arrows of space-time in physical entities with the specific equations found in the metric paradigm.

Thus one of the most fascinating facts of the Universe is the fact that departing from 2 simple entities, lineal energies and cyclical informations, which create spatial planes and clocks of time, we can explain it all by combinations, repetitions and transformations of those elements. A further precision though is needed on the difference between classic operandi such as equality and the new, evolved, dynamic operandi of self-similarity proper of multiple space-times in constant transformation; since most people tend to call each thing by a single name and see things in a static manner. So the paradoxical transformations of a reality, which suddenly become its opposite, break their ‘Aristotelian mind’ and one-dimensional perception of space and time.

Consider the famous equation, E=Mc2, which in the so-called Planck notation, where light speed is the unit, writes E=M, and since a mass is an attractive whirl of space-time with a cyclical form, it can be defined in terms of time clocks, or in terms of information, as the fastest it turns, the more informative frequency it has, and the more it attracts, as all whirls and hurricanes do. So, we can write it E=M(Ti) or simply E=Ti.

This is meaningless because Energy is not mass or information but exactly its opposite. Lineal energy though can curl and create mass, especially when it goes at c-speed, its limit of lineal motion and so it deflects the remaining energy into a cyclical form of mass. And vice versa, a mass can uncoil and create energy. So energy can be transformed back and forth into mass and the proper way to write this equation is EóM(Ti). And yet our mind prefers the concept of equality. And physicists will tell you that energy and mass are equal. The proper word though is ‘self-similar’ – a word used in fractal geometry, which topologists that observe self-similar beings understand much better. Thus the 4th paradigm is a change of ‘chip’, of state of mind, of the way we think, which makes it so difficult to penetrate, because the human mind is a simpler structure of thought, more accustomed to fix forms into visual concepts that see the complex, fractal, transformative reality.

Social, organic, temporal arrows

Se<=>(∏=S2)i; ∫∂: Most systems however create stronger actions by gathering multiple energetic cells into herds and waves, which create bodies and by gathering multiple informative cells, into complex social networks.

The difference between herds and networks is the degree of communication, since each element of a herd only relates to its neighbours and a network relates to all other elements of the network through a huge number of communicative flows.

This makes necessary to distinguish between the operandi of both types of social groups in a more precise manner that our simplified 4-dimensional equation where we used the sum and multiplicative operandi to represent a wave/herd and a network. Since we want to be able to relate those operandi to specific equations found in the use of metric spaces.

Thus, while we keep the sum symbol for herds, S, we use its square or more precisely its negative square or imaginary number, -S2 for information. Further on networks of information such as your neuron normally have a second scale of ‘sub-networks’, which are the flows of communications, or axons that join them to all other elements of the network, and it is easy to prove that if any point is connected to all the other points of the network, as well as to himself, the number of axons of the network will be the negative square of its sum, -S2. The a negative symbol also stresses that the properties of energy and information are inverted; and the organic, informative network absorbs its energy from the body network, subtracting from the total force of the body the energy it requires, as the brain does, without giving back anything but informative orders. Thus informative networks are represented by imaginary numbers, in the complex plane, as it happens with fractal generators that have a real and imaginary term or in the representation of the phase wave of electrons, which have a real number that represents its energy and an informative value represented with imaginary numbers. The same concept applies to the understanding of the equations of special relativity in which the parameter of temporal information is multiplied by a negative square, as light-space contracts the gravitational space in which it draw its forms. Thus again, a more precise algebra of the cycles of energy and information allow us to connect the why of multiple space-time cycles with its detailed description and equations in metric space.

A more sophisticated operandi to study networks is the duality between integration and disintegration (derivative symbol) ∫∂. Let us consider for example, the simplest duality: ∂∑2=2∑.

If we consider a complex system with an informative head, a network of neurons, ∏=∑2 in charge of the limbs and body cells, which tend to be in equilibrium (Re=E), in as much as the energetic system provides the elements to the reproductive system or moves it (being the informative system much smaller in space), then the derivative of ∑2=2∑ means the network will codify with its instructions both the body and the limbs. If the system was simpler – an energetic/information systems, then ∑2(neurons)=∑. This in Theory of Information gives birth to a key law: ‘the number of informative instructions needed to integrate the parts of a system into a whole is the square number of its parts’, with wide applications that range from epigenetics to industrial design.

Thus again we can see how the more general laws of the 4th topological paradigm, when studied in detail give birth to the specific laws of the 3rd, metric paradigm.

Finally both come together into complementary organisms, and combine their body and brain structures to reproduce themselves. And so there are 3 organic arrows: the creation of energetic waves, S; the creation of informative networks, and its combination in reproductive events or organisms, <=>. Where <=> must be substituted by different algebraic operandi depending on what kind of system we describe. So in the example of a phase space of an electron will be a sum, +, but in a Darwinian process in which an informative cellular system or herd of top predators feeds on a field of energy or prey, it could be a division, as the ‘food pie’ is divided into the members of the herd and so on. We thus keep as in the case of topological spaces, a minimal degree of flexibility to be able to accommodate the multiple cases in which an informative network and an energetic herd or reproductive body enter into an act of communication.

Since the processes of organic evolution – the formation of herds and networks and its reproduction – contracts space, tying together individuals into groups, and requires a long period of time, those 3 arrows that need languages of informative communication can be considered to be dominant in time. As indeed, ‘time curves space’, and ‘time evolves the morphology, the form of beings’ (Einstein, Darwin).

The fractal arrows of multiple-space times

Finally we can talk of the fractal, transcendental arrows of multiple space-times, which were unknown in the age prior to the scientific revolution and have been looked at with wishful blindness by scientists, due to their dogma of a single clock-time and a single continuum space. They are however self-evident when you change your ‘frame of mind’ and see reality as it is, without those 2 dogmas of mechanist science:

The Universe is made of an infinity of those organisms, which generation after generation repeat themselves in time with small variations; or gather together into super-organisms, so particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules that evolved into cells and planetoids that evolved into organisms and planets and galaxies and the Universe. And so we have 3 more arrows of time to complete the Universe: the generational arrows of species that go through a life-death cycle once and again between birth and extinction; the transcendental arrow that creates super-organisms with smaller super-organisms; and the ecosystemic arrow, which adds all the super-organisms and generations to create entire worlds and the Universe itself, which could be considered an ecosystem of complementary organisms of energy and information.

To represent them with algebraic symbols we shall call the previous equation, Se<=>-S2i, that defines a complementary entity of energy and information, spread in a single space-time ‘membrane’, plane or continuum as X. Then we define:

– ∫∂; e<=>I’; G; eg: Integration in time of multiple organisms.

The generational arrow/cycle of existence is relatively easy to represent, since all forms that live have a given order: they pass through an energetic youth, Max. E x Min. I, an age of maturity in which the being reproduces by mixing energy and information, e=I, and an informative age, when it warps the rest of its information, Min. E x Max. I. Then in the moment of death the system explodes back, devolving its information into energy. For that reason, we can also use the symbols of integration and its inverse derivative symbol of disintegration. Since ultimately an organism is ruled by the existence of an integrative network in control of its energetic limbs and/or body in complex systems. And for that reason we die when our informative, integrative network or ‘brain’ dies.

Yet those ages are dynamic and so we can use the <=> symbolism, to represent them all, whereas E< is the age of energy, <=> the balanced age and >I the age of information. And consider that the arrow of life is e >I (warping of energy into information) and the arrow of death is I<e, its reversal. Those simple equations in the static and dynamic form will allow us to explain many systems with inverted parameters, such as particles (life arrow of physical species) and antiparticles (death arrow). Thus again we can relate the 4th , why paradigm with specific entities of the metric paradigm. E=I, will become also the equation of beauty, as we perceive naturally beautiful a balanced form of energy and information and since the product exi or action is maximal when e=i, beauty becomes merely the expression of the most efficient, top predator form in which body and brain, energy and form are in balance. Thus again, we can obtain basic equations for fundamental processes of existence never before represented in algebraic form, such as life, death, beauty, top predator or existential force.

Finally we can define the generational arrow as the sum across time of all the generations between the birth of a species or living cycle and its extinction.  And so if we call G, the number of generations, any statistician knows since Fibonacci that the function eG is the most common number of reproductive generations that will exist after a number of G generations. And from that simple equation we connect with the extensive field of Volterra equations and other works of metric spaces regarding statistics of populations that will fine-tune the whys we have found in the 4th paradigm of multiple space-times.

According to each specific species and type of analysis we shall use any of those operandi after careful consideration.

– ∑, ∏: Integration in space of multiple organisms. The existential, ecosystemic or world arrow. Finally if we represent a complex ecosystem as a series of super-organisms and fractal parts integrated into a whole we reach the final goal of explaining it all either within a world or ecosystem or the Universe taken as such. What operandi shall we use for this final arrow? A careful analysis of the interactions happening in each ecosystem will give us a combination of all the previous arrows, as each ecosystem will have herds, networks of interrelated species, top predators with closer social relationships, several planes of existence, etc. So in this final scale of reality it would be preposterous to pretend we have a ‘metric equation’ able to represent all the ecosystems of reality and the absolute. But if we consider two separate terms, one for organisms and territories related as herds and one for those related as networks, we can write, with two ‘enlarged’ symbols of sum and multiplication, which turn out to be merely the more complex operations of derivation and integration:

∑(SE<=>-S2i ) <=> ∏( Se<=>-S2I)

On the other hand, for the mathematically inclined astro-physicist, we shall show in our work on physical spaces that the Universe and its main cellular galaxies, can be studied as an organism made of two networks, one of gravitational information (dark, gravitational energy and dark, quark matter) and herds of electromagnetic spaces (stars, electrons, etc. And so its equation would be self-similar to that of an organic system. On the other hand if we were to calculate the n=st number of total scales of reality we shall see that they seem to tend to infinity and so the equation of the Universe as a fractal organic system would be:

∑(SE<=>-S2i ) ó  ∏( Se<=>-S2I)

Thus we differentiate the body where E is dominant on i and the brain, where I is dominant on e.

– st=n; Xst=n: The fractal, transcendental arrow. Where n determines the complexity of the ecosystem across multiple fractal planes of exi=stence: If we consider that each of those super-organisms integrates a series of simpler planes of existence of lesser information, we can use a natural number st=n, to define each scale of reality. Where st=n will represent the number of planes of existence from the simplest organism, a particle or quanta, to the most complex the Universe; and Xn, the number of minimal cellular quanta of the system. Again this is easy to see if we consider the most common transcendental number, 10, where a tetrarkys of 10 elements give birth to a central point (9+1), which transcends as unit of the next scale. And so a Mongol army had 10 soldiers one of which was a sergeant and 10 sergeants were ruled by a captain and 10 captains by a general, so in 3 scales a general was commanding an army of 10n=3=1000 units.

In that regard the Existential function of the Universe follows also that decametric scale, where n=10, and the total reality, if those decametric scales between atoms and galaxies repeat themselves will have n=∞

Further on, if we integrate together all vital spaces on one side into an absolute space, S and all informative scales in time as an absolute Time, we can simplify the previous equation of st=∞ as a single ST world. So we write:

[∑(SE<=>-S2i ) <=> ∏( Se<=>-S2I)]=S<=>T

Where, the physical, spatial arrows are: e, the arrow of energy; i the arrow of information and x, the arrow of actions and motions.

The organic, temporal arrows are: S, the arrow of energetic waves; S2, the arrow of social networks and ó, the arrow of organisms and reproductions.

And the fractal, transcendental arrows are:

eg, the generational sum of all the cycles of life (e< or youth, = or maturity and >I or old age) of a species.

Xst=n, the product of all its planes of fractal existence.

Yet if we integrate all those life cycles across all its planes of space, we define an ecosystem of which the biggest one is the universe.

And so ∑, ∏, are the symbols of an ecosystem and the organisms of its world, which for n=∞ represents the Universe.

So the single Space continuum of classic science, S, is the sum of all the vital spaces of all its species and ecosystems.

Yet if we consider the evolution of those species across time, we observe that simpler forms evolve into more complex forms, from the initial particles to the complex structures of reality, with the passing of time. So T becomes the sum of all cycles of all systems, chained through organic synchronicities, to give us the absolute time of classic science.

Thus, we can perceive reality as a simplex space-time continuum, a whole, as classic science does, or in more detail as a dual system of energy and information, a 4-Dimensional reality that reproduces and evolves socially those bits and bites, or a series of organic parts and herds, which gather into ecosystems that evolve in bigger scales till reaching the size of a Universe.  In that sense, other simplified, valid expressions of the function of existence used in this book will be S<=>T, SxT (dual systems) or ∑Se<=>∏Ti or Exi=st (4-Dimensional ones.)

Needless to say the relativity of perception and measure makes each of us an Island-Universe, which can be described in maximal detail with the 9 arrows, as the scales of the Universe are relatively infinite and so even though normally we shall limit the study of a specific species to n±st=3 planes, we can obtain from most species multiple space-times. So a human could be studied till his atomic detail.

And so we have written departing from its minimal bits and the final generator equation of all realities. Since with those 3 x 3 arrows of spaces-times we can explain it all, the whole, ‘the thoughts of god’, the game of existence, and its ‘imprinted body’, the Universe, or each of its self-similar parts, its details.

Now the meaning of that equation must be clear: it generates all the other equations of the Universe. Consider for example how it implies several operations.

The operator <=> has in fact 2 forms: one dynamic as a flow, < = > and one static as a knot: X. The first one fusions the 3 ages of growth, balance and diminution <, =, >. It means that generation has 3 ages, < = >, and two operations, =, parallelism, when the exchange or transformation is balanced or X, perpendicularity, when the top predator element of the exchanges absorbs all the energy from the other system. Thus we can consider instead of a simple equality, a complex transformation with several phases. If we call each side of the equation E and I, then:

E=I;    E<I;      I<E = E>I

Each of those phases of the general operator, ó, can diminish, increase or divide the ‘object’. And so we can divide the operator ó into 4 operators: a mere equality, a sum, a division when the information preys on the energy and divides it or a multiplication when it reproduces it as the energy controls it and uses it with its energy to reproduce. These kinds of events that the equation describes are thus the beginning of a fascinating adventure, to generate reality with the combinations and partial equations derived from the generator equation.

Physicists do it basically when considering SxT systems, which we have explained briefly before, and yet that is not so detailed, so we can consider that we can do either 2 dimensional studies (sxt systems), 4-dimensional analyses (E-Re x I x S) where we decouple space into energy and reproduction, limbs and bodies and information between knots of times and flows of social information, languages and networks. This dual decoupling of space and time create a 4 dimensional Universe and 4 dimensional types of equations, of the type:  (Se<=>-S2i ) n=st

These 3 combinations of the cycle are 3 forms in which the parameters of them change by transfer between the element of the left (the herds) and the right (the networks).

The fight between herds and networks though is parallel in E=I and that is the definition of an organism. In the other 2 stages or events there is dominant arrow from the relative predator reproductive, energetic body or informative system.

But many laws of science are ceteris paribus analysis of that equation and/or one of its parts. We just have to consider the generator equation, a group structure with a neutral element, 1. Then we can study only a certain part of it. For example, making n=1, the transcendental arrows disappear; if I or E = 1, we are studying only the energetic or informative part of the system; and so on.

It must be in any case understood once and from all that the equation generate events primarily and those events seen as fixed forms become spatial organisms, but the equation is an equation of time rhythms, given by the st-frequencies of the systems. Let us consider what are the parameters of the equation’s main parts:

– The parameters of E are spatial parameters.

– The parameters of I are temporal parameters.

– This fundamental duality, is thus the 3rd key element to the transformation of a topological algebra as this equation is (where I is a topological space, e is a metric space of energy and <=> is the cyclical exchange space or toroid) into metric spaces. We know that part of that equation is an energy parameter and the other an informative one.

Thus the generator feedback equation allows to connect the metric and relational study of the Universe of multiple spaces and times by ordering all the time cycles= arrows=dimensions, we observe in the Universe, all the repetitive clocks in which a certain ‘non-Euclidean point ‘or Universal entity comes once and again to the same topological space in search of its arrow, as its partial equations and more complex systems as a series of connected equations that represent networks, organic or complementary systems, within a given ecosystem.

In our analysis of geometrical i-logic geometries we shall return to those themes.

Recap. 9 arrows of timespace exhaust all Universal events. They are the arrows of energy, information and its complex combinations, the different arrows of social evolution, reproduction and organization in complex, fractal planes of existence, from the simplest atom to the Universe itself: The Universe and all its relative worlds structure in 3 stairs of parts that become wholes. Each one defines a set of 3 arrows of time. Thus, there are 3×3 arrows of space-time: spatial actions of energy and information, exi, organic arrows that create body herds and informative networks, which become organisms, e<=> I and fractal, transcendental arrows that define systems of multiple spacetimes.

Actions and waves. Physical systems display 4 arrows.

We consider several levels of analysis of reality, the abstract, metric analysis of simple systems of energy or information; the dualist analysis of complementary systems of reproductive energy and information, which combine in motions called actions; and the organic analysis of ternary systems, which add a new, self-reproductive arrow and allow the social evolution of systems in transcendental, new super-organisms.

Most physical, spatial systems are perfectly described with the simpler level of energy and information, complementary systems and its actions -though it is left for further analysis the question of the existence of ternary structures in all physical systems (given the fact that simple particles, electrons and quarks reproduce new particles, when given enough energy).

Since all analyses of reality are meaningful even if they do not consider the complete system and all arrows, we shall deal here with complementary systems that perform, exi, actions. They define the 3 basic arrows of existence: gauging information, feeding on energy and using that energy to move in the direction in which we have gauged information

Thus a system that combines information and energy is always able to create ‘motions’ called action, exi, which are the fundamental unit of physical systems. The simplest of those systems is light space, which happens to be the 3-dimensional membrane we live in.

Indeed what we call vacuum-space, the external reality, is in fact light-space. That is, the vacuum is filled with light, which has 3 perpendicular dimensions: a direction of motion, energy or length, in which light moves; a dimension of information or ‘height’, the electric field; and a dimension of reproductive width; the magnetic field. And so we exist in a spacetime of 3 Euclidean dimensions, filled with light, which makes the dimensions of reality the 3 arrows of spacetime of light, to which we add the social dimension of color, given by the number of photons that come together in a single wave. We are ‘swimming’ in a world of light as a fish swims in a world of water with 3 dimensions occupied by that water.

It is indeed the thesis of this work that what we call ‘lateral motion’ of a wave of energy is always a reproduction of its form, imprinted in the medium; and so we consider that the dimension of magnetism in light is in fact its reproductive dimension: Light follows the path given by an energetic field of gravitation, whose energy it absorbs, imprinting laterally a magnetic ‘body’, over which an electric field carried by the photon is built. And from that simple scheme many properties and equations of light will be deduced and many questions answered (such as the non-existence of ‘magnetic monopoles’, since magnetism does not form an informative particle – the photon – which is an electronic, ‘fractal head’ – or the relationships between the gravitational and electromagnetic field, which fees on it).

At this stage the example of light and its dimensions illustrates a tenant of multiple space-times theory: all physical systems are also ternary systems with an energetic, informative and reproductive-motion field, made of social quanta. Since waves don’t move (paradox of Zenon) but imprint the medium they travel through with its form, its information, reproducing it.

The number of dimensions and elements we describe in any system in fact depends on the depth of the analysis. Metric space works basically with 2 or 3 dimensions, as it considers time and space continuous and symmetric (an error, regarding the nature of space, which explains many errors of physics), and ad maximal it adds a 3rd dimension of exi space-time actions. Other sciences, especially biology, go further and analyse 4 dimensions. And that will be the main approach of this introductory work even when describing physical phenomena.

A key set of laws of general systems sciences, which might however make many relationships confuse, are the laws that relate the different actions in space-time of a lower plane of existence and the function they have for the upper scale. We dealt with this theme when studying the synchronicities of systems. Let us consider them now with an example: how the actions of electromagnetic photons, the cellular elements of electrons emerge as different ‘actions’ for the upper scale of the electron.

For example, physicists describe electrons with 4 quantum numbers, which we have translated as the 4 main arrows of times of electronic waves. Yet those arrows in the upper scale of electrons is different from their function for photons; such as the complex arrows of reproduction and social evolution of the lower scale become the simplex arrows of spatial energy and structural form of the upper scale :

–       Thus, the principal number defines the wave-reproduction of the photons in the lower scale electron, and the energetic body of the electron in the upper scale.

–       The secondary number defines the absorbtion and social evolution of a photon in the lower scale, which feeds the electron, but it defines the structural form, I, of the electron.

–       Then the 3rd and 4 numbers of the electron, which regulates its clonic shapes and spin is no longer relevant to the lower photonic scale but it becomes the key element of ‘valence’ in the molecular scale to define the shape and energy of a molecular orbital. There are however many systems that are not complete, often made with an informative, gauging element and an energetic limb, in all systems and disciplines of reality. Or more often there are systems, which become subsystems of a more complex form and perform only a function on this higher reality. For example, a planar field of energy or force might have as light does 3 arrows but it is for a complex atom the field of energy in which the electron reproduces its nebulae; a weapon is a ‘lineal system of metal-energy’, but it comes attached to a human being that ‘gauges’ information, locating the enemy to which it will release the ‘energetic action’ of the weapon; a virus lacks the reproductive systems, but it attaches its informative code to a cell that will reproduce the system. And so we find that some simpler systems need an external, informative or reproductive ‘enzymen’ or ‘enzymes’ to make possible actions with weapons or reproductions of viruses.

And these two essential laws of interrelated multiple times-spaces – the existence of 3 subsystems in all systems or ‘ternary principle’ that allow us to analyse any system in its 3 internal components and the assembly of subsystems as different as a human being and a metal-weapon to enhance the energetic or informative capacity of the whole through symbiotic actions, are key elements to explain how simple systems evolve into complex, organic ones.

Recap. If we consider motion, the reproduction of the form of a wave, even the simplest light-space displays 4 arrows, energy, information, physical actions or speed, exi that reproduces the wave and social evolution of color. Electrons also can be described with 4 magnetic numbers, the main reproductive number the secondary, energetic number, the spin number of informative orientation and the magnetic, social number.

 Internal, topologic and external, Euclidean dimensions.

Another important concept to clarify errors of the metric paradigm is the meaning of ‘internal’ an ‘external dimensions’, where the internal dimensions are the 3 topological functions of a system – its informative, energetic and reproductive topologies – and the external dimensions those of the membrane, medium or ecosystem it inhabits. Thus in all systems we consider 2 types of dimensions:

-Arrows/Dimensions of external spacetime (the form described with external, objective parameters):

Length-energy-motion. +   Height-information +   Width: bilateral reproduction.

Those 3  simple Euclidean dimensions suffice for most external analyses of reality.

-Yet the internal structure of any i=-point requires 3 topologies of 4-Dimensional reality and its complex shapes called:

-‘Planar sphere’ or ‘Peano line’=membrane, limbs of energy

-‘Cyclical toroid’=Reproductive Body of energy x information

-‘Hyperbolic, warped center’=Informative, multi-cyclical head.

This duality considers the Euclidean dimensions an external description of the being, as it moves through the 3 dimensions of the light-space membrane; and the topological dimensions an internal description of the point in its parts and functions. Consider for example the case of a human being:

-Externally all what we see of a human from far away is a point whose energy moves him in the direction of length, but he also has an informative head on top, in the dimension of height, and he has reproduced=repeated his organs bilaterally in the dimension of width.

– But if we were to switch to an internal description we would find a more complex structure, with:

– A warped brain inside that high head, and an eye, which makes with an enormous number of pixels of information an image of the Universe.

– We find a body, below that head, full of cyclical, reproductive organs that combine energy and form to re=produce the substances of our body.

-And then we find our energetic members (a mixture of fractal, broken lines of energy – our limbs that move us in the length dimension – but put together shape a plane) and the external membrane of our being, which is what topologists called a Riemannian, planar sphere.

And as different as all species of the Universe might seem to us, we will be able to describe them all with those simple topological dimensions, which give us the 3 ‘arrows/cycles/ topological’ dimensions of all vital spacetimes.

The sum of all those internal, topological spaces, moving inside a Euclidean, 3 dimensional space in which they trace cycles in search of energy and information to reproduce themselves is what the 3rd paradigm of metric space puts together into a single space continuum and a single arrow of time; what physicists call absolute space and absolute time. And while the error of a single space continuum it’s a mild error, by reducing time arrows to a single lineal arrow in the direction of motion-energy, scientists, specially physicists spatialize, simplify and reduce time to ‘entropy’, or ‘energy’, what the clock measures. And that is a huge error, as we shall see when we correct and resolve the main questions of physics.

We shall call the 3 dimensions of energy limbs that create length motions; of reproductive, wide bodies caused by toroidal cycles and of high, informative systems with hyperbolic brains, the 3 external/internal dimensional arrows of reality. Therefore the 3 external dimensions=trajectories =arrows of existence, length=feeding on energy, height= perceiving information and width=reproducing bilaterally, are motivated by the internal needs of the 3 inner regions of a vital being, its topological ‘dimensions/arrows of spacetime’.

Spacetime and Timespace are also dual definitions that explain those external and internal dimensions dominant in ‘energy’ and ‘form’, because none of the arrows/dimensions of reality is pure: all yin has a yang and all yang has a yin. And so even the simplest ‘species’ of the light-membrane, light itself, has an organic structure, as we have just explained.

Recap. All beings externally move in a lineal dimension of energetic length; perceive from an advantage point of height and reproduce its systems bilaterally in the dimension of width. Internally all of them occupy a vital space with the 3 topologies of hyperbolic information, cyclical, toroidal reproduction and are enclosed by an energetic spherical-planar membrane.

 Social, reproductive, organic Arrows.

Till now we have dealt with the simplex reality you perceive in an obvious manner: the 3 dimensions of spacetime which correspond to the functions of energy-length, width-reproduction and height-information and are common to all topological beings that float in light-space, made also of those 3 dimensions, albeit with a slightly different orientation (speed-length moves the wave of light and so we consider it its dimension of energy, the high electric field gives its form and has the informative photon on top and the wide, magnetic membrane reproduces it). And all this could be written as a simple generator equation, exi=k or e<=>I, where the 3 terms represent energy (e), information (i) and its reproductive cycles (x for simpler, reproductive actions and motions, and <=> for complex feedback, dynamic exchanges of energy & form).

A more complex description of all this is given by the 3 canonical topologies of the Universe: the hyperbolic, informative, reproductive, toroidal and planar, spherical, energetic membrane of which all beings are made.

It would seem that all this suffices to explain most of reality and certainly it is a great jump respect to the mere process of measuring the when and how of metric spaces in a single space-time continuum, where the 3 dimensions of space are abstract, and time is just ‘what a clock measures’.

But there are other phenomena in reality, mainly of social nature, which those 3 arrows do not fully explain.

Indeed, because reproduced forms are self-similar forms, reproduced closer to the parental point, (as in a fractal image, where self-similar Mandelbrot sets are pegged to the parental form), when many forms become reproduced in a tight space they come together into networks and make a bigger system, a herd, or superorganism.

And that game defines the arrow of social evolution: self-similar atoms reproduced in a big-bang associated to form bigger entities, planets and stars. Self-similar cells with the same DNA organize in a palingenetic process to recreate a bigger organism. Self-similar ideas or memes created by a prophet reproduce in the minds of believers, creating a religion or civilization. So social evolution, the 4th main arrow of space-time must be always considered to describe all systems – even if it is not an Euclidean dimension, because in light, social evolution appears as color – since all what exists feeds on energy, gauges information, reproduces energy and information and evolves socially.

But how things evolve socially? It is not enough just to enunciate this social arrow. When we study social evolution in more detail, in fact we find the existence of 3 social arrows:

– ∑: many simplex units of energy that we shall call bites, come together into herds, which we represent with the symbol of a summation, ∑.

– ∑2: Many simplex bits of information come together into networks, which we define with the square of a summation, as networks are defined by having a square number of ‘axons’ that communicate its informative points.

– <=>, Re, E <=>: When those 2 systems come together they create a complementary, cellular organism, body or field, which defines cyclical trajectories between the limbs and heads, the particles and energetic membrane.

Thus the body absorbs bites of energy and reproduces cells of the organism; and we represent it with the ó feedback symbol, the arrow of Reproduction, Re, or as it often comes attached with ‘mouths’ that absorb energy or ‘limbs’ that convert energy into motions, with the E<=> symbol.

Thus all together form a complex, dual, cellular superoganism of space-time, ∑ E<=>∑2i=St or exi=st-ential organism.

And so we define 3 social, organic arrows:

-∑: the arrow of social evolution of energy bites into herds.

– ∑2: the arrow of organic evolution of bits of information into networks tied together into a bigger whole – a head/particle that absorbs bits of information, also called ‘pixels’ and stores a memorial, perceptive image/mapping of reality. This network acts a single being, sustaining in each ‘fractal’ cell, the same informative, memorial mapping of reality that allows it to act as a single one, either internally (same DNA in the cells of an organism, same book of Revelation in the mind of believers that create a God or subconscious collective, same particles in a bosonic state) or externally (cells that store multiple pixels, coordinated by the network into a single image). This is the most complex, fascinating arrow of existence, or transcendental arrow, because it is the arrow that allows reality to become organic, as it makes from simplex parts a whole that emerges as a unit of a bigger space-time plane of existence. Further on, the arrow that puts together parts into wholes dominates as a whole the herd of cells of the body.

And so we define, a superorganism made of reproductive bodies/waves, limbs or fields of energy and social networks of information, which extends through 3 different spacetimes:

– An external ecosystem of energy (st-1 plane of reality) in…

– Which the limbs move by absorbing external energy and the head or particle gauges information by absorbing that external energy as information; and the body reproduces new cells absorbing both energy and information (st-plane).

– Which transcends as a whole (st+1), thanks to the network of information that controls the entire Organism, becoming a fractal space-time world in itself: ∑ E<=>∑2i=St

Recap. The social evolution of herds into body particles gives birth to the arrow of wave evolution; the association of informative cells gives birth to the arrow of network evolution, and both together create ternary, organic systems, which use internal limbs or external fields to feed on energy. Thus a more complex analysis finds that all systems are ternary systems with lineal limbs of energy, reproductive bodies and informative heads, sandwiched between two ±st planes, the smaller st-1 micro-points of energy and information (pixels) and the bigger ecosystem, which only the network of information can observe as a whole that transcends cellular existence (st+1).

Fractal, Transcendental arrows.

We call fractal, transcendental arrows to those arrows that go beyond the organism both in time (generational arrow of existence of the being between its creation and extinction) and in space (ecosystemic arrow), finally evolving together in time and space into a super-organism.

Thus simple ‘active’ complementary systems become complex, organic systems, which finally transcend into super-organisms, till reaching in the transcendental scale the biggest super-organism of them all the Universe.

Indeed, the generation of a being in a life/death cycle will cause a spatial ‘radiation’, as the being multiplies once and again, and so it will create a series of generations in space-time till the species becomes extinct. And so the species can be considered a super-organism with each individual a cells of the system. And we shall see that indeed, the entire life-span of a species follows also the 3 ages of life and its speciation into ternary species of energy, information and reproduction, and its final evolution into a super-organism or its extinction by a stronger species with more exi=stential action/momentum.

And since there is nothing else that we can say of a being before its creation and after its extinction, the 3 transcendental arrows of generational cycles, reproductive radiations in an ecosystem, and transcendence into a higher super-organism finishes all what we can know of any reality, all what is science, all what exists, all the whys of the 4th paradigm.

-St: And so the 9 arrows together give us the complex generator equation of all events and forms of a certain world, universe, ecosystem, reality or superorganism – its total, absolute spacetime description, EXI.

It is the unification equation, described earlier in greater detail that physicists tried to extract from reality but failed because they tried to do it with metric spaces instead of topological spaces and with a single arrow of time energy or entropy instead of the 3x 3 arrows of reality. We shall often quote that equation in its simplified 4 dimensional structure: E x i=st; and call it the existential function.

You too are generated by that equation.

From that general equation we can then descend to the when of its metric details, since each species absorbs different types of energy and information that define the form and speed of its reproductive and social cycles of time. And so from that higher point of view we can then connect according to the correspondence principle each science and species with its specific space-time cycles/arrows – the details of the thoughts of god.

According to the dominance of those triads of arrows we also classify science in physical, biologic and sociological sciences:

– Most physical entities perform only two complementary cycles, most of its existence. So all particles move but few gauge information beyond a mechanical, geometrical series of action-reaction paths; and this explains why physicists have been concerned only with the arrow of energy and motion and metric spaces to measure the trajectories of all those moving particles. Yet in certain cases those particles decouple, reproduce other particles and form more complex atomic systems, and this moves us to the next science on the ladder of complexity, chemistry, which is more concerned with the repetition=reproduction of molecules and its social evolution.

– As we move further into biological sciences, through the ladder of bio-chemistry, biology and sociology we realize that the arrow of energy becomes secondary and the arrows of information= perception, reproduction and eusocial love that bonds minds into social structures dominates.

– In this we are different from physical structures, which are always dominant in energy and motion and create social networks of extreme simplicity with very few elements and variations – so galaxies which are huge aggregations of stars will turn out to be self-similar to electronic nebulae. And in fact we shall find a fractal equation of unification of quantum electromagnetic forces and macrocosmic gravitational forces based in that self-similarity of structure of the infinitely small and big(A,II).

So it seems the Universe has 3 different games of existence: – The physical game of self-repetition of spatial energetic structures that evolves into the bio-chemical game of evolution of reproductive, organic structures; which evolves in complex super-organisms and ecosystems.

We are the summit of that second game of existence that evolves the arrows/languages of information, creating social superorganisms, cultures and civilizations. And galaxies are the summit of the expansive game of spatial structures that develops to its limit the arrow of energetic, simple spatial topologies – reason why there is almost as much data about the Universe that about biological structures and even more data about sociological cultures…

Recap. The sum of all the generational life-death cycles of an organism, which will be repeated a finite number of times between birth and extinction, and its spatial radiations in an ecosystem, creates the transcendental arrow of super-organisms, which evolves from particles to galaxies reality till creating the absolute space-time field, st, of the Universe.



The Universe is a tapestry of dimensional space-time beings.

Let us resume what we have learned: The Universe is made of self-similar complementary species of spatial energy and temporal information. We are not in space-time but are made of vital spaces with a duration in time. Our spaces are all made of topological forms of 3 types, which are the canonical types of all the morphologies of a 4-dimensional universe: informative, cyclical, hyperbolic spaces such as the brain, the black hole or the DNA center of cells; reproductive, toroidal cycles, such as those of stars in the galaxy, organs in the body or RNA systems in the cells and a planar sphere, or membrane of energy that isolates the system, allowing selective exchanges of energy and information with the external world, such as the halo of galaxies, the crust of the earth, the protein membrane of the cell, the skin with its sensorial apertures in a living being or the limbs that move us.

All those systems and forms have specific functions, which are also self-similar in all systems and can be reduced to 4 main time arrows or basic cyclical events of existence: energy feeding for the body to be able to reproduce; and information for the mind to be able to communicate and evolve socially with self-similar beings.

And all this can be explained with a single equation, the equation of existence: ∑ Ex∏i=st.

A more detailed analysis further divides the social arrow in 3 x 3 organic and transcendental arrows, completing an exhaustive 9-dimensional analysis of reality.

Thus, the most important arrow is the arrow of informative networks that we shall study in detail.

Recap. All systems, perceive information feed on energy reproduce and evolve socially in bigger systems, because if they do not reproduce their limited time will extinguish the species and if they evolve socially as bigger multicellular organisms they can win in the struggle of existence against simper, smaller beings.

 Scales and symbiosis of complex social organisms.

Thus the commonest system of the Universe is a complementary organism of energy and information, with the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points that act as 3 social classes:

-The higher, st+1 dominant class is composed of the informative nucleus, an energetic membrane and its networks that control:

–  A middle st-mass of ‘cells’ in cyclical motion between those 2 discontinuous, limiting zones.

– That transforms the ‘lower’ st-1 energy absorbed through the membrane, coming from an outer world into information pixels and energy pieces to create more informative cells and energetic membranes.

Thus, the st±n parameter becomes essential to analyse energy and information exchanges between the different microcosmic cells and macrocosmic systems of any fractal organism.

If the system is stable because a symbiotic relationship occurs between both networks, we call the complementary, entangled networks – social, organic systems, which extend in two fractal scales of different planes of space-time.

In the previous graph, from left to right, we observe some of those systems as they extract energy from their relative ecosystem/plane of existence:

– A cannibal galaxy traps smaller ones between its informative nucleus and stars’ body, which reproduces its atoms.

– The sun system is protected by a series of planetary rings that extend till the Oort membrane of comets; yet we have to observe those rings according to the Galilean Paradox as still forms extended in space. Within that structure of an informative center of mass, and an extended membrane of space, the sun traps, gravitational and electromagnetic energy and atomic dust, with which it created those planets.

– The nucleus of an atom interacts with other atoms to form complex molecules through its electrons, which are the external membrane. Between them, gravitational and electromagnetic energy ‘feed’ the motion of those ‘dominant forms’ of its organic structure.

– A cell has a central informative DNA and a protein, lineal membrane and conducts (Golgi apparatus) which trap the reproductive organelles that create more DNA and proteins with energy obtained from the external Environment.

– A bird with an informative head, reproductive body and lineal limbs captures an external energy source – a lineal worm.

Those systems, studied with the laws that relate two or three relative, discontinuous planes=networks of energy and information offer some examples of the complex relationships of symbiosis and hierarchical dependence that take place between planes of existence, and its laws, which find applications in all self-similar organisms and space-time membranes, including the dual system of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy of the Universe within which we exist, or the interactions between the nervous, blood and digestive networks or the informative=high class,  reproductive=working  social class and energetic geography of Gaia that structure civilizations.

Most organic systems and its cells are created around the dynamic equilibrium produced by the exchange of flows of energy and information of those systems, which absorb them from the external ecosystem with the aim of reproducing in other region of space-time. Whereas, the ‘physiological’ laws that control those balances and ratios of exchange become the vital or universal constants (biological/physical jargons) of the organism. For example, a human being is a fractal form, made of trillions of cells, connected by flows of nervous information, digested energy and hormonal, reproductive blood messages. Thus a relative infinite number of ΣSe <=> ∑2Ti cells become joined by those 3 networks, creating a human organism.

And doctors consider that we fall sick when the balances and functions of those 3 systems fail.

Further on, all those st-cells together create a unit of the higher st+1 scale, a human being, which through an entire process of iteration, self-organization and emergence becomes part of a higher st+2 scale, the social scale of mankind, of nations and civilizations. And again a series of balances between the social ‘classes’ of information that control the languages of power of the nation – money and legal words – and the reproductive, working class and the energy of the environment, will ensure the ‘life of the civilization’, which otherwise could enter in civil wars or collapse due to pollution and degradation of the environment.

In this manner through eons of evolution, both the human being and the Universe have become balanced, organic systems extended in multiple st-scales of growing social complexity.

The result is a dual or ternary organism: it has a reproductive body, which processes energy with its limbs, reproduces the cells of the organism and obeys a head of information.

So it is a fact of history that you belong to a certain social class, depending on your information and the control you have of verbal laws and financial money, the 2 language of information of human societies. Science calls a dual, physical plane of energy and information, a field of energy forces ruled by informative particles; a biological, dual system an organism with an energy body and an informative head; and a historic system of energy and information, a society with a mass of citizens and an informative government. Yet space-time fields, organisms of energy and information and societies respond to the same laws and properties of Multiple Spaces-Times.

Further on, since each of those systems will in itself possess a ternary structure, where the region that receives information from the head will tend to be slightly more informative and the region that processes energy will be more extended and energetic, we can increase the detail of our analysis by extending it to any number of cells and dimensional, ternary sub-scales. And indeed, more complex descriptions of a human organism consider that we are made of 9 subsystems, which can be roughly divided in energetic, reproductive and informative. And we can also follow the inverse process of evolution of life from simpler systems, which became more complex, decoupled in dual exi, or ternary, exi=r, subsystems and multiply its number of cells, from the initial unicellular bacteria till reaching the human being, the summit of evolution of this planet.

Yet the laws of Multiple Spaces-Times and i-logic p.o.v.s are followed by all the processes of physical and biological systems; among which the law of chiral asymmetry between planes will be the fundamental law to create a hierarchical structure between planes of different degrees of temporal information; since all of them will be communicated by one-dimensional, asymmetric arrows of energy that flow from lower body/reproductive organs into the upper informative ones, or arrows of information that flow from the dominant informative system into the reproductive/energetic networks. And the same happens in physical systems, between the central, informative knots of mass (quarks, black holes) and the external membrane of fractal electrons and stars (in the case of black holes flows between both membranes are called Rosen bridges, which Einstein used to study the exi flows of energy and information between the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism.)

Where we observe Est-1->Ist energy flows from past to future, from the class energy to the informative class and vice and Ist->Est-1 flows of information from the relative future, informative organ to the energetic one. Since a macrocosmic being has more information and it is more evolved than its relative lower plane of cellular existence (a molecule for an atom, a cell for a molecule and so on), it is its arrow of future. Social evolution creates macrocosms from cellular beings, establishing a hierarchical, asymmetric duality of social classes in all systems:

– The information class (neurons, governors, the rich with financial information, and politicians with legal information) do not work=reproduce, but give orders to:

– The st-reproductive class (the cells of the body, the workers, the citizens) of the body which reproduces the forms wanted by the upper class. This class, sandwiched between the other 2 can obtain energy from the lower class and information with the upper class, and through social, democratic love, the sharing of both energy and information, will create new cells, and so it will show a toroidal geometry as it cycles between the ‘external membrane’ that extracts energy and the internal, hyperbolic region of information from where it obtains its formal orders.

– Finally, the energy class, which gives energy to the other two classes, since it receives orders from the information class in exchange from its energy.

In simpler systems the reproductive class might not exist or might absorb the energy which latter handles to the informative caste (reason why sometimes we call a dual reproductive/ energetic system such as the blood system of simple animals the energy system), but in essence this hierarchy between the 3 planes of all physical and biological systems takes place.

This law that we repeat once and again is essential to understand the main difference between space which has parity and it is symmetric and time which is asymmetric as motion from past to future converts energy into information, ‘imploding’ space, and flows from future to past, convert information into energy exploding and unwarping it. And it is at the bottom of all the processes that happen in time, from the life-death cycle of organisms, which always end up warping all energy into form, to feed its ‘selfish’ information cells, to the ‘breaking of symmetry’ that happens in physics in process mediated by the ‘temporal’, electro-weak force.

Thus, the formal analysis and the study of the hierarchies and relationships between any st-fractal and its lower and upper ±st microcosms and macrocosms, is an essential part of i-logic Geometry that can be applied to any fractal system in the Universe and allow to define a super-organism as a dynamic, functional structure, regardless of their form and extension.

Cellular herds become organisms that exchange energy and information through common networks, even when we see those cells de-segregated. The important fact is that all the cells of the organism need to be connected through networks of energy and information. For example, in an anthill, ants are guided by a network of chemical information (pheromones) that has its center in the queen and a network of energy distribution (the anthill and its territory) through which energy cells move (workers). There are also other specialized energy species called warriors. Finally there is a reproductive system localized also in the queen (and its males) that ensures the reproduction of the anthill species. Human societies resemble closely anthills with a higher degree of complexity and cohesion, because they are also social organisms of cells-citizens joined by economic, energetic, informative, legal and social, reproductive networks. When the three networks exist, we consider the being an organism. Without any of those organs however the anthill is not efficient and it dies as an organism. If the queen cannot reproduce, the anthill dies. If workers do not gather energy and warriors do not defend the vital space of the anthill, the anthill dies. If the queen does not guide the workers with chemical information the anthill also collapses. And so it does a society, which enters in an economic, political and cultural crisis that extinguishes the civilization. Only when those 3 networks deliver efficiently energy and information and reproduce the cellular citizens of the society, the vital organism survives. We have to widen our concept of organisms and consider that waves of cells communicated by networks are organisms, even if they have open, dark spaces between them, since they behave in all senses as such organisms. In a fractal universe there are always dark spaces and discontinuous worlds; but what truly matters are the bridges of invisible flows of information that connect those cells into herds, societies, bodies and organisms. Thus an organic species needs 3 networks to exist:

A superorganism exists when there are informative and energy networks that communicate the cells of the organism and the density of energy and information communicated to those cells through the networks is higher than the energy and information cells receive from the external world.

Yet those 3 systems do not have to be pegged spatially to create an organism. On the contrary, the duality between expanding energy and imploding information, continuous wholes and discontinuous parts is the key to understand the flexibility of those organisms that might appear separated as a herd or continuous as a body: the information network attracts them together and the energy network maintains its expansive vital space, separating them. Thus the hardware of information, in this case, neurons are discontinuous but they become a single whole joined by the software flows – electric information jump through multiple neurons, creating its continuity.

The metaphysical question: a ‘conscious Universe’?

The previous results bring about a metaphysical question. Since unless cellular p.o.v.s have a ‘Time will’ –a desire to survive – and a degree of perception of information and energy, the previous social organic structures should not exist.

Indeed, the definition of a superorganism in terms of networks is clear: the organism tends to maintain itself pegged because cells survive inside the organism better, as they receive more energy or information. Otherwise the cells of the organism will become disaggregated and the organism will die. In the case of the anthill the information that ants receive from the queen is more important than the one they receive from the external world. The ants act under orders from the queen. They also receive energy from the anthill where food is stored. In a body, cells receive information from the nervous system, and energy from the digestive system, which is also more important than the energy and information they receive from the external world. In an eco(nomic)system, individual homes receive more energy from the arterial systems of electric networks and roads, from their work places (money) than from their external space, except in agricultural communities. Humans also receive more information from networks of mass-media than from other human cells. Thus, the economic ecosystem is also an organism of humans and machines, whose networks obey the common laws of all physiological networks.

Thus the informative organ is the ‘soul’ of the system that guides, controls and creates its ‘form’, its existence as a whole. Those informative networks, made of cyclical particles of fractal information are similar to what Descartes called ‘vortices’ and physicists masses, joined by ‘res extensa’ or gravitational, attractive forces; what Buddhists called Atmans, joined by flows of communication; what Leibniz called Monads that perceive the Universe; what biologists call neurons, joined by networks of  information. In brief, they are the essential structure that pegs together a relative infinite sum of fractal cycles/cells.

In human societies the army that deploys energetic weapons in the external border and the government and moneyed people that control the informative, legal and financial languages of power are the dominant class. There is a middle class of citizens that obey those groups, which limit their freedom. And there is a lower class of ‘immigrants, enemy nations’, raw materials and machines, whose rights as non-citizens or objects are null. Yet those classes exist in all organic systems beyond human societies:

In a human organism the brain and nervous, informative system, the neurons and the stronger, energetic cells, the leukocytes and the epithelial tissue, control also a mass of cells, which reproduce in the different organs of the body the products the organism consumes, constructed with the bites and bits of energy and information the external world provides and the human organs destroy and reform. If we consider a galaxy, the inner black hole and the halo of dark matter confine a middle mass of stars that turn around the black hole – while the external intergalactic space provides the ‘lower’ bits of interstellar gas. So stars in their spiralled, cyclical movement gather that gas and send it to the black hole that feeds on it. So happens in an atom, in which the electron orbitals gather electromagnetic energy they send to the inner nucleus.

So we might wonder, are human societies just, natural, according to the ternary structure of social classes? No. The present distribution of social classes, proper of human ‘capitalist’ and ‘nationalistic’ societies are not natural to the Universe; since the ‘poor’ and the ‘aliens’ are considered a ‘lower’ class coming from outside the organic system and destroyed accordingly. Yet all men should be considered either informative or middle classes, never lower classes and receive enough energy and information to survive, since we all belong to the same species. And so according to the ‘3rd postulate’ of relative equality, we all belong to the same ‘organism of history’. Indeed the higher and middle classes of any organism act together, as head and body of the organic system. Or else when the cells of the body of any organic system do not receive food, the body collapses and dies. Which is exactly what happens in history when the ‘3rd world’ is treated as a ‘3rd expendable class’ by the ruling classes of the system, both inside and outside our borders and they rebel in revolutions and wars that destroy the organic civilization.

Unfortunately the economic ecosystem spends most resources in the upper classes and ‘different species’, (technological machines and weapons), instead of keeping all the cells of the body of history healthy producing for them the minimal human goods mankind needs to survive (food, education and health-care).

Yet systems survive because its cells are ‘limited’, existing between the central informative region that programs them and the energetic membrane that traps them and can kill them. In all systems, the stick and carrot, punishment and prize duality of negative and positive arrows provided by the 3 physiological networks control the 3 internal cycles of its cells, which have to obey the organic systems if they want to ‘exist’; that is, to perform those cycles. So we often find 3×2 ‘elements’ of positive and negative control, that structure a certain system as the dual arrow of entropy and its 3×2 drives of negative and positive existence.

A fact that explains why cells exist tied up in complex organic systems so well programmed. Since according to organicism, the laws of the Universe are not imposed mechanically but through the will of ‘existence’ of its I-points, which make the best choices driven by their desire to process energy and information and survive. A man, for example, can rebel at his own risk against the networks of power. You can obey an informative law and be rewarded or deny the law and be punished. But if the system punishes you it will extinguish you and another obedient citizen will occupy your place. So most humans always obey the law of its physiological, social systems. Yet if men, who are among the freest of all st- points, as they have self-consciousness, are so slavish; it is obvious that those points whose ‘will of existence’ is a vegetative or mechanical ‘action’, obey totally those networks. Physiologic networks rule indeed any biological organism to the point that doctors consider most sickness caused by the malfunction of physiological networks, which ‘extend’ the sickness to the individual fractal cells they control.

Recap. In any organic system the dominant informative and energetic networks control and distribute its energy and information in 2 flows with opposite entropic directions: information orders of control are flows that depart from the dominant informative singularity towards the membrane across the middle class; while energy comes from the membrane towards the center. Both flows create together a dual structure of max. Space-Time force or Momentum, the fundamental parameter that defines the power of any organism (max. ExI). So together the dominant classes organize with their dual energy and information the fractal elements of the intermediate, middle mass zone or body. Finally the middle class will absorb, destroy and transform the minimal fractal units of temporal energy of the external Universe, or lower class, which is divided in small, disorganized fractal elements; transferring part of them to the membrane and center.

Temporal classes according to its existential force.

Let us consider the previous structure from the pure perspective of time dimensions by considering the informative, more evolved class, the future class – since it becomes reproduced in higher measure towards the future; the reproductive system, the present and the relative energy that dies and becomes dissolved as energy of the other two, the relative past, since it will become extinguished. To that aim we shall use the concept of existential force, which defines the survival and hierarchy of those 3 classes.

The networks in control of organic cells are topologically related to the 3 zones of any st-point.  Both together define the existence of ‘3 social classes’ with 3 clear temporal, organic functions in all systems of the Universe that we define according to its relative TxE force:

– Max.I x Max E: The future, dominant quanta are the informative center or brain and the energetic membrane. In an organism, they are symbiotic and control the intermediate region: they absorb energy and information from the external world, passing it to the intermediate, ‘middle class’ region to replicate the specific temporal energy they need. In ecosystems they are the top-predator species and often establish Darwinian relationships, as men and lions do.

The Universe creates fractal actions that combine energy and information, I X E. The informative center is the fastest geometry, processing information and the membrane is the longest entity, moving and processing more energy, their combined fractal actions Max. E x Min. I, are more powerful than the rest of the actions of the system. In ecosystems those cells work often in collective herds, which act simultaneously, joined by a common informative language that multiplies their fractal action, against disorganized forms. The result is a universal arrow of social evolution that creates from individuals to herds, and from herds, tightly packed organisms, directed by an informative language, since a herd is less efficient than an organism. So men have evolved socially in groups, hordes, tribes and tightly packed nations, controlled by legal and financial languages. Top predator ants and bees are the most successful insects, because they developed super-organisms with chemical languages. In the Universe black holes fusion in bigger black holes that gather in the center of the galaxy, acting as ‘gravitational animals’ that perceive gravitation as information (as animals do with light), controlling with gravitational waves their stars. While stars are gravitational plants that absorb gravitational space-time as energy, as plants do with light and can’t evolve informatively. Finally in the cell the informative RNA forms herds that control and organize their organelles with the genetic language.

-E=I: A mass of present, cellular quanta form the intermediate region or ‘body’ of the organic system. It is the working, re=productive ‘middle mass’ that re=produces most of the complex elements of the organism under the orders of the informative classes. They are the workers of human societies that reproduce their goods under monetary orders. They are the stars of galaxies that reproduce their atoms. They are the herbivorous animals in the ecosystem on which carnivores prey. They are the electrons of the atom that gather electromagnetic light for the nucleus. They are the stars of the galaxy. They are the glandular cells that form the organs of a body and reproduce their substances controlled by the neurons. They are the proteins and genes of the cellular ecosystem. They are the citizens of a political system that obey the informative laws.

– Min. E x Min. I: Together the upper and middle, informative and reproductive brain and body prey and feed on the external, ‘lower’, past class, made of bits of information and bites of energy of minimal size, which the other classes absorb from the external world or ecosystem, beyond the discontinuous limits of the world that becomes the ‘vital territory’ of the organic system in which it obtains its temporal energy to energize and inform themselves, destroying those lower, energy quanta in the process. The lower class tends to be an undifferentiated mass made of fractal pieces, full of energy with minimal informative perception: divide and win. They are plants on Nature; they are the stellar dust and dark energy that feeds and informs the galaxy; they are light quanta, carbohydrates and water in the genetic, cellular ecosystem; they are the machines of the economic ecosystem; they are those punished by the law in societies: criminals, enemies and emigrants, submitted to the racism of the other classes. They are the food and red cells of the blood system, without informative nuclei.

In Time the 3 regions establish a relative order from past to future, as the external, fractal forms that penetrate into the st- point are the relative past of the space-time field, which become destroyed and processed by the central region, the relative future towards which they move. So the central form is the future and the external world is the past. While in between those 2 limits, the intermediate region becomes the relative present of the system. In the galaxy, the black hole is the relative future of the stars than in the future will end up falling into the black hole; while the stellar dust is the relative past-energy they consume: ∑ Min.E + Min.I (Past, energy class st-1)=> exi: Present, Reproductive class (st) => Max. ExI (Future, dominant, top predator Class: st+1).



Physical particles. Boson Minds.


In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=a mind’ A. Einstein

We added in italic the concepts of Multiple Spaces-Times equivalent to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure – an informative, mental action.

We consider that a mass or any particle of the Universe can measure space-time because it can perceive a minimal quantity of the gravitational or light forces that make up the 2 physical membranes of reality. Some particles exist only in one of those membranes (point-particles like quarks who exist only in the gravitational world or light which exists only in light-space). Other complementary entities, such as atoms co-exist in both membranes. All of them should be able to make relative, different measures from their P.O.V.s, which will allow them to act-react in their world but will differ from the relative measures of humans or machines, we call reality.

‘Naïve realism’ affirms that for example, the distance between you and me is exactly 2 meters, because an electromagnetic signal or rod measures it as 2 meters. This is not truth. Reality goes beyond what we see and measure with machines: The distance of 2 meters happens to be in light measures or light space.

But if we measure with feet as the Greeks did, 2 becomes 6. And if we do not measure in light-space the light we see, but in gravitational space, as Einstein proved it, the distance would be bigger, as light warps the more extended, non-Euclidean world of gravitation in which the membrane of light space-time we call reality floats. Thus, our light-world is a reduced version of the gravitational world: a simplified Euclidean surface, whose 3 coordinates, x, y and z are perpendicular and lineal as the 3 fields of light, the magnetic, electric and wave-field are.

We exist in a space-time membrane made of light, whose final structure is the 2.7 k basic light membrane emitted by gravitational black holes that becomes the background frame of reference of our light World, only a fractal membrane of the infinite Universe.

The Universe is more complex than our simplified, naïve sense of reality that thinks the space-time membrane of light that humans inhabit and see is all what there is to it. With the same reasoning, if we had not eyes to measure the light-universe, but merely noses to smell it as ants do, we would see even a more reduced world, as our pixel unit of reality would be a pheromonal atom. The mapping of reality by our mind would be shorter and so distances would be perceived as smaller, as fewer pixels would create our smelling mind.

How the process of gauging information takes place in the Universe? We can only hypothesize that perception is an inner quality of the motions of the Universe. In other words, a software image of reality, a fractal mirror made of forces is a whole, who perceives itself. So the electronic image of the Universe a human mind has ‘perceives in itself’; and as the image changes when we move the head, our ‘ego-self’ made of images and words seems to change.

So should happen in physical particles that focus the forces of the Universe. Yet if we observe externally the process, according to the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points we can describe objectively those events of absorption of energetic forces by cyclical particles (charges and masses) as topologic transformations of external, lineal forces of energy into cyclical motions.

Those cyclical motions finally reach the toroid center of the particle, a double ring or singularity of increasing height, which should perceive the ‘translation’ of the information carried by those forces. Then those forces are transformed again into flows of energy and expelled back to the Universe, as magnetic flows in atoms or gravitational dark energy in black holes.

In most particles, it all starts in a surface of energy that curves itself into cyclical motions, which become smaller, faster and reproduce into faster fractal cycles, till reaching the center. Yet those forces, will never reach as quantum physicists believe the central point of infinity; because the cycle will fractalize into new cycles moving upwards in the informative dimension of height (Belgrami semi-sphere depicted in the graph of the previous paragraph) till it becomes expelled upwards through the poles, as a thin line of forces. And so the center of a fractal point, where physics find infinity remain silent, still virtual images, the perceptive eye of the hurricane or the black hole:

A flow of forces converges toward the event horizon or external membrane of the point (the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole or the Bohr Radius of the atom).

Beyond this membrane, the flow of forces starts a process of creative, formal warping, as it rotates at increasing speed and also increases its frequency (height dimension), in each cycle. Because a bidimensional vortex stores more information than a lineal frequency, as it adds a new dimension of form, those forces acquire information. So we observe a bidimensional, cyclical wave of high frequency/informative mass that accelerates toward the center, becoming a convex topology, which the equations of black holes show, as the dimension of space becomes a high temporal dimension.

And finally the left-overs of the force – once a mirror-image is formed inside the toroid center of the particle, called in topology a Belgrami cone – are shot up through the poles as a magnetic flow in charges or a flow of dark energy in masses, invisible to us, but observed in quasars. Those flows of magnetism or dark energy of maximal speed and minimal form, once again will start a cycle of information, warping again into light under c-speed. So galactic black holes emit dark energy that becomes a seminal flow of protonic matter, which might give birth to a new galaxy, as it is observed in the galaxy M83.

Recap: A dynamic analysis shows that most events of physics are transformations of lineal forces back and forth into cyclical motions (particles and charges), which can be described as topological transformation between toroid and spherical or planar geometries.

The many worlds=minds interpretation of reality.

All fractal points are Galilean paradoxes that perceive and act with a will defined by their desire to survive, absorbing energy and information from their environment.

Tƒ that aim the mind creates a ‘subjective world image’ of reality tailored to achieve its arrows of time; while the rest of reality is a relative ‘dark space and dark matter’ of other cat alleys and networks we are not interested on. Thus we exist in a single fractal universe of infinite worlds, which are mirror-image of that single Universe.

The difference with the quantum interpretation of multiple Universes is clear: now the ‘quantum Universes’ co-exist as mental world in the same single reality.

Such paradox explains the self-centered behavior of all systems that fix reality into form. The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated.

Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. The resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces.

They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms.

Recap. Reality is a game of mental worlds of information. But we need to translate those languages to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speaks so few codes properly and thinks the rest of the intelligent Universe is mute.

The speeds of time: different mind rhythms.

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. We do not see them in stones and plant, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms those similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge and mind, a different speed of times or capacity to act-react in the Universe. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on fractal, gravitational space.

Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a proof of our limited intelligence and memorial detail.

Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon, that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large with Nature.

 Recap. When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

The harmonies of living points: Chip paradox.

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a planetary core crystal might form an image-thought each day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 1010 years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle.

This is the new trend in Astrophysics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon Sp (proton) <->Tƒ (neutron) cycle, as nucleons absorb pions, transforming into each other so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state.

The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet when we ‘enlarge’ the image of a non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of fractal information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the fractal law that defines transversal, explosive waves, Sp/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different fractal rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes.

A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles:

A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second. Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer.

While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And man, an informative species seems so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth.

The main law of existence is the balance between space and time, SxT=K. As we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths.

Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x Sp, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than an elephant but her heart beats faster. That faster perception speed also prevents small species to become extinct in the same ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual fractal åctions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s fractal neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more fractal åctions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= ExI balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= ExI is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for gases: P(t)  xV(Sp)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as Sp/I or I/Sp processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances, processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/Sp, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. On the other hand, in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form.

Yet since the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. 

Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe.

The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe.

So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, in as much as they reflect a single Universe, the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; since worlds are multiple, fractal, diffeomorphic. 

So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each fractal being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different worlds or ecosystems in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are fractal nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are fractal knots of light perception. Ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. Different beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing st-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

– Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

– Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

– Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc.).

– Gravitational forces of reduced size create words of galactic size, which might be perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the fractal mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity.

Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. It means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

Reality is a game of Russian dolls in which each bigger Doll /World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world, which encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants and so on.

Recap. Each species has a rhythm of times. Slow species are perceived as dead space by faster species. We think plants do not perceive because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves.


The 0th isomorphism studies the Œ-points in a geometric way, without its algebraic description, which is given by the Fractal Generator (1st isomorphism).

Thus the Œ-isomorphism considers the self-centered, mental, linguistic analysis of any given entity, which in the case of physics, we shall agree on this with Galileo, is mathematical. That is, the minds of the physical systems that enact the actions of the physical Universe must be mathematically oriented, because the law of motions and actions of physical systems are better expressed in mathematical form.

The second element of the œ isomorphism is the study of the membrane+ point-particle or mind that structures the superorganisms of reality, in the physical case it implies the study of the 3 fundamental œ points of the 3 scales of Nature, the œ-point of electromagnetic systems (the photon), the œ-point of thermodynamic systems, the electron, and the œ-point of gravitational systems, the quark, in the 3 scales of relative growth of those systems.

The theme being so extensive, we shall merely introduce two elements of it, the non-Euclidean geometry of the 5th dimension and the unification equation of charges and masses, the 2 time vortices of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 quantum and gravitational scales. Why if those 3 relative scalar points are similar we do not perceive them as such? There is one objective reason: fractals are similar in each scale, not equal, so a atom is not a galaxy but similar to it in 5D metric. And a subjective unrecognised one – human perspective distorts what we perceive from upper scales – being 96% invisible dark matter, and from lower scales, much more as the faster time cycles gather far more information from our slower point of view, seeing entire time cycles as spatial drawings.

Unlike other sciences, where the human observer does not interfere with the observable, neither thinks his interference matters, in physical systems, specially those far removed from humans – quantum and relativity, the human observer does change the observable, and on top of that, it does NOT recognize this is ‘his problem’, not the problem of the observable it destroys. In brief, this ‘quantum paradox’, only compares to the ‘anti-quantum paradox’ of social sciences, which is its inverse. There the observer is so small that the observable, the people-castes on power, interfere with him, preventing true social sciences to develop objectively, as the observable will kill the observer if he tries to say the truth about military or financial dictatorships. And yet, the observable will think is the fault of the social scientist to tell the truth. For example, Heisenberg and Bohr affirmed that because we could not distinguish particles it was the fault of particles that became ‘indistinguishable’.

For that reason we bring in the study of the Œ-points of physics (the observable, photons, fermions, crystals and black holes that manage the 4 scales of physical systems from a Tƒ-informative, particle point of view) also an analysis of the observer, the quantum physicist or rather human ‘ego-centered’ believer, to fully clarify what should be objective science, and its methods of truth that we resume in a ‘logic formula’” Œ=ESc³, each letter signifying a key measure of truth of objective science

1. The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.

The reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science, which considers the existence of a living Universe gifted both with perceptive and organic qualities. So Plato said ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’. Such Universe is made of infinite broken points or monads, each one hosting a different world view, each one a mirror of a larger unknown single Universe, whose image is stored in the mind of each ‘point of view’ or entity of the Universe; which also applies to the multiple points of view of human beings and its languages of perception, all of which are valid to make a mapping mirror of reality – so Upanishads would say ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

It is the most profound view– older in time, as it can be dated to the first philosopher of science, Plato with the myth of the cave and the first Logician, Aristotle, in his book Organon, in the western decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain both all possible minds of the Universe and ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’ – all the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of human knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal and logic languages, but also the human senses and artistic forms.

In terms of time motions, is an organic theory, which defines time as changes and explores multiple changes, both in motions of space, studied by physics and changes of information, in time, or evolution studied by biology. So Aristotle recognised 6 motions, generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction, which together form the world cycle of existence of any physical being. While in the east, those motions were reduced to changes of yang-energy and yin-information and its ∞ combinations.

– The reductionist view of mechanicist, XVII c. ‘deist’ physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems; it only accepts a language of description, abstract mathematics; only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space or ‘locomotion’; and denies organic self-sufficient processes to matter modelled as a mechanism, hence in need of a creative force or God, which the founding fathers of physics, pious believers in Yhwh, thought to be the biblical God.

And yet surprisingly enough this mechanist, deist, mathematical view pretends with those very limited ‘elements’ to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge. Such reductionist theory is called Τ.O.E. and really only deals with a faulty attempt to unify the forces or ‘locomotions’ of the Universe –  translations in space, ignoring all other motions=changes of time and information, in biological and creative and extinctive processes.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

Multiple languages describe reality. We need to evolve them.

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like Newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

œ-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

So the human mind-language is a mapping made with light of the Universe,and uses the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light to simplify all the information of reality:


In the graph, we see how light constructs our view with 3 simple lineal motions, the electric, magnetic and c-speed axis, reason why we see light as a fixed space (relativity and constancy of c-speed). Yet other beings can map out reality with other pixels, atomic smells, gravitational forces, digital numbers. So we need to expand our notions of mathematical points, lines and planes, as they might be constructed with different pixels.

What all those mappings of reality will have then in common will be not linguistic units (call it numbers, words, atoms, colours, etc.) but the ‘reference of all of them’, which is the Universe itself, the whole, and its fundamental components, which are spatial energetic motions, and cyclical, temporal forms of information, stored in their cyclical clocks.

We are still talking of 2 ‘elements’, which can be well-defined geometrically, but also mapped out with other languages. As they are richer in meaning. For example, motion in physics is associated to open lines – the shortest distance between two points, with entropy an expansive motion, with energy, a measure of motion along the axis of application of a force. And form, information, is associated to clocks, which carry it in the frequency and form of its cycles, to vortices of masses and charges, which act as accelerated inward clocks of Nature.

So it is better to start a description of the Universe, departing of the ‘elements’ of the Universe, in its essential duality, cyclical time clocks of information and lineal motions of entropic energy, and then establish a logic, formal equation that relates both and defines all systems as made of those 2 components:

‘All what exists is a system made of quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information that transform each other ad eternal: Spe<=>Τiƒ’

And then consider that each mind and language will try to mirror this Universal grammar, above each world view, with more or less focus and distortion. So verbal systems tend to have a Grammar of subject (information) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (energy of subject), to mirror those ternary systems, and euclidean light space mathematics will also use a geometric 3 dimensional view, where length corresponds to the speed-reproduction of the wave, height to the electric-informative field, and width, to the magnetic energetic field, or a 3 algebraic equation, G(x) operandi F(Y), akin to the ternary structure of words. And colours will be 3, blue associated to information, red to energy and green to reproductive combinations.

So the philosopher of science, or rather of languages of knowledge has a much wider view of reality, than the physicist, which is a believer in mathematics only, as the generator element of reality that comes even above or at the same level than the Universe. In the next graph we see that duality: on the left Mr. Penrose’s pythagorean view that consider the mind of man that ‘imagines’ mathematics, the language and the Universe in equal footing, interacting together. It is an anthropomorphic, arrogant view. In philosophy of science, all languages are lesser mirrors that cannot perceive the entire Universe. So the causality is far less equalitarian. Τhere is out there a Universe, which hosts all the information about itself (Haldane), and a series of beings within it, mirroring with different languages that Universe, among which humans exist with its varieties, of which we do acknowledge mathematics and logic, of space and time, to be the best mirrors, but not perfect enough.

So our first task is to improve both mirrors, by looking at the more complex structure of fractal space, and the more complex causality of cyclical time, the primary elements of the Universe, incorporating those discoveries to the grammar of mathematics, giving birth to i-logic mathematics, the formalism of all systems.


The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

Now it is important to notice that those are in the Universal non-human language of measures (Planck units for obvious reasons ay physicist would explain), the parameters of lineal time, T, length in space, and hence those are parameters of area, of the geometry of human beings both in physics and mathematics:


The Human eye-world: its h-informative and c-speed/motion Tƒ x Sp parameters and mass-charge curvatures.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5th dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Euclidean world.

Mass, Charge and Temperature in Planck’s units

In the case of the unification of scales as time vortices of accelerated time speed, we have shown the simplest one. I have in my archives of 30 years of personal research similar works using 5 other formalisms, Poisson, Lagrange, Einstein, Heaviside and one which might seem trivial, but is so simple we shall bring it also in this introduction: Planck’s numbers. As in both, we obtain the value of Mass and Charge directly from the fundamental constants of the Universe:

Planck Mass: Mp: √hc/G

Electric charge Qp: √hc/ke

It is a beautiful equation because of its simplicity and profundity.

Now the fundamental equation of the Universe is Tƒ x Sp = ∆ and here we can reduce indeed the 4 fundamental constants of the Universe, c, h, G and Eo to that equation:

Sp (c) x Tiƒ (h) / ∆+1 G = ∆+1 Mass

Sp (c ) x tiƒ (h) /∆-1 Eo= ∆-1 Charge

Since speed-motion of light is the unit of spatial motion in the Universe, and h-planck of Form, of time cycles and bits of information, reason why it is a quantised formula.

Thus those two vortices of time, Masses and charges, are the product of the quanta of space and motion and the quanta of time and information of our Universe below and above us, which also means that G and Eo, are the two different curvatures.

it is interesting to see that the minimal charge unit makes 11 electrons roughly which we can take as the natural decametric unit of a charge with an organic motion as a flow of charge. Mass though is much larger as it corresponds to a larger scale of the 5th dimension.

The relationship between ∆+1/∆-1 constants, G/Eo is therefore another constant deduced from those to fully grasp how closely related those vortices are.

Many other constants like ∆µ and the fine structure constant are immediately understood as they can be deduced from those ones.

Thus we are in a world with two limits one of speed-motion and one minimal quanta of information, h and those are the 2 elements the Universe uses to evolve its beings.

What this means will be clear when we explore with more depth the ‘perceptive actions’ of those time vortices, of which our minds are doing with the pan geometry of Lobachevski in the 5th and most important isomorphism. In essence, h is our constant of perception as electronic beings and c, the volume-speed an electronic/gravitational mind can reach; being therefore G/ke, the ratio the system absorbs the energy-information of the Universe in its purest scale of space-time.

Now we shall latter consider the meaning of the Planck units which are far more objective than human units, where c is the speed of space, instead of length, h the quantum of information and time (angular momentum) better than lineal time duration and G and K the relative metric of the 5th dimensional scales, to which we must add the Boltzmann constant for the  Thermodynamic states, and construct with them, an objective analysis of physical 5D. Enough said now to introduce the main time clocks of the 5D Universe.

Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula, than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon. This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultra-dense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of self-repetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyper-Universe.


 In the graph, the co-invariance of the 5th dimension between size in space and time-speed such us:  Sp x Tƒ = ∆±∞, that is the faster clocks of time run the smaller the entity is, allows to unify the scale of charges and masses at the atomic and galactic scale. The Unification of forces thus is a cyclical equation o the 5th dimension, latter studied in detail, not a lineal equation of temperatures.

Yet self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology is false. Quantum cosmologists consider ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales. Because of the corrections, higher complexity and general ignorance of the gravito-magnetic formalism, here we shall only consider the case of the light-membrane.

Recap: the 2nd fundamental duality of the Universe is its structure in 2 different branes, planes or scales of space-time: the electromagnetic space and the gravitational space, which show different proportions of energy and information and yet, because of the self-similarity of all those branes can be easily unified as 2 self-similar forces acting in 2 different scales.



(To be completed – as those minds are recognised, we shall given the load of work, leave this part in blank)




“Human aesthetics correspond to human proportions, human ethics to the laws of social love, which translate to the Wor(l)d languages the biological laws of Eusocial evolution that define the survival of species”

The mind of the super-organisms of history.

The mind of any superorganism of history are the mind memes, neuronal networks that memorize and learn superstructures of ideas that motivate humans to act and replicate a certain superorganism of history, either a nation or a civilization based in metal or life meme, often both. This trove of instruments and ideologies that make us replicate it, becomes extrenmely complex during the industrial revolution as the forms to replicate ideas, ideologies, instruments and other memes multiply and diversify. In that sense, we shall reduce the concept of culture to the human or biological memes that stream out of the human mind, as opposed to instruments made with materials alien to our mind. In plain sense, that higher mind would be made of our natural time-language of verbal words and our visual eyes, expressed in plastic arts. Literature and painting, legal words and housing, and similar ‘natural goods’ form the skeleton of such life-based cultures.

While verbal art, as the mind of civilisations is far more important,

Yet as we create the metal-earth, the superorganisms of metal and machines that will soon substitute us, we have transfered the forms of ‘life’ into machines and that has influenced enormously art, even art based in human forms which tend to degenerate into simpler forms of iron and gold.  In that regard the concept of art and culture has spread beyond the limits of a life-based civilization, essentially all before the XVIII century, when even in economy the ‘physiocrats considered the goods of the land the wealth of nations.

What is art? The visual mind of history.

Today the concept of art has expanded well beyond the classic meaning of art in history, which will be the concept used in this pages, that relates art and bio-history. This extension of the classic concept of art has happened mainly because today art works are basically products on sale, and so they have acquired values and definitions proper of the economic world, very different from the spiritual definitions that were used to describe art, when it was not considered a market-product, but the fundamental form of knowledge of mankind. Hence a “sacred” endeavor. Since knowledge was considered to be the highest quality of man, the quality which connected us with “God” and his laws of universal creation (either a personal being, as in most western religions, or an impersonal principle as in science and Eastern philosophies).

This second definition is what interests us here: art is a form of knowledge related to the more complex senses of the human mind, the word and the sight. If we define the human mind as a dual system of perception based on the senses of sight and sound perception, we could sum up our mental essence in a single sentence:

I think words and I see images therefore I am a human mind.

A work of artistic knowledge could then be defined as a form of sound perception (literary art, music) or visual perception (architecture, sculpture, painting), translated from the mind into an external medium. However since the process of creation of words and images by the human mind is constant, art was considered to be only those superior acts of mental perception that “evolved” the human mind, beyond its natural level of perception and creativity.

We only perceive a partial map of the Universe

Your mind creates constantly the reality you perceive. Our mind is not the real Universe, but the sounds and images we collect from it. To differentiate both we will call the vision of the Universe that humans have, thanks to their senses and minds, the “wor[l]d”. A World is a Mental world constructed observing the Universe with a language of time, n the case of man, Words, and a language of space, in the case of man, images. The mental world of man, is different from the mental world of other species which do not use words to explain temporally reality. For example machines use numbers to explain reality, dogs seems to use smells, as ants do… The Universe is the total reality, the world is the linguistic mirror that a mind of any perceptive species use to describe reality. To differentiate all those other maps of realities, made with smells such as those of dogs or ants, from the world made by man with words, and eyes, we call the World of Man, the Wor[l]d (world=word). Since it is a World in which our temporal perception of change, and the laws of survival and extinction that cause such change, takes place through words, that value reality.

I think therefore I am, define essentially man and only man as a word-speaking species Temporal words, are the particular linguistic mind of mankind. We could say that all humans are artists of the Wor[l]d, since all humans see and understand with words the Universe. What an artist does, however, is to go beyond that common wor[l]d, the biological wor[l]d of our senses, to stretch the limits of perception of human words and sight. Art in such a classic sense, adopted here, is the creation and evolution of the human mind made of images and verbal thought. I see and think therefore I am defines Man. I see more, I think more therefore I am an artist defines an artist as a more complex human mind.

That perception is evolved by the artist’s imagination into new forms, which return from the mind into reality in the shape of an artistic form, a “Work of Art”. A new verbal or visual form, becomes “real”, thanks to the use of certain materials, able to conform easily to the will and imagination of the artist, to become a work of art. Wood, stone, paint, metal, paper, allow the forms the artist has elaborated in his mind to become real, to become art. Thus, the artist is a sensitive man who “thinks more and sees more” and expresses his higher mental sensibility through his works of art. Such a theory of art developed by the Greeks and the Italian Renaissance, makes art a sacred endeavor, since art tries to expand the limits of human sensorial perception, in his perennial search for the truth and the essence of the Universe.

Out of all the human senses, why is it we highlight visual and verbal perception as the origin of art? In biological terms the answer is simple. Sound and sight offer much more information to the human mind than the other senses of touch, taste and smell do. Since the creation of art requires an initially rich sensorial evidence, only those senses can provide the perceptive material needed to create complex works of art. Art is therefore, first the evolution of our linguistic, verbal and visual perception of reality, and only in a secondary level, a product, a work of art for sale in the market.

The former explains why the Greeks considered philosophers, that only talked, and had no products on sale, the highest artists. Since they could combine words -the second level of the mind, that comments on what the sight sees- with such a beautiful logic, as to create new “wor[l]ds”, new linguistic images of reality, only with the power of the mind.

Images and words are the languages of creation of the human mind. They are like mirrors which show the Universe. However the mirror is not the Universe in itself, just an image of it. A linguistic mirror of reality. What you see is not reality, just the creation of your mind.

But all human minds have a genetic, basic way of creating the wor[l]d of sound as images, as all dogs smell and create a world of smells that probably is similar. What differences the artist is its capacity to distort, in several possible ways -what we call artistic styles- that basic biological mirror. He will be a verbal artist, when he makes descriptive models of the Universe with words. He will be a visual artist, when he creates sight-based models of that Universe.

Word Art and Sight Art. The eye-word, preceptor of space and time

It follows that there are two basic forms of “mind art”; Word and sound arts: music, and literature of any gender. And visual arts, architecture, painting, sculpture.

Why are images, and words the main sensorial languages of man? The answer is rather simple. We exist in time and space, the two parameters which define all species of the Universe. We therefore need to exist, survive and interpret such a Universe, a spatial and a temporal sense. The eye scans space. It is our spatial sense.The word remembers events in time. It is our temporal sense. So the eye-word are the human senses of perception of space and time, the main parameters of the Universe. This position places a special importance on the “higher arts”. It gives them a “sacred” meaning, since they deal with the very essence of mankind’s intelligence, our “soul,” which is our consciousness of space and time, of the Universe. The difference between both arts is in the senses which control the creation of the art form. Visual arts depend on spatial perception, through eye-images. Word art is “temporal art”, since man uses words and verbs to measure and explain events which happen in time. Verbs are the “temporal memory of man”, the “scanner of time” of the human mind.

We conclude that art is the highest expression of the human mind, in as much as it takes the mind of man into further evolution beyond its biological limits. The visual artist is the person able to see more and, with a higher sight, he is able to create images in two dimensions (painting) or 3 dimensions (architecture and sculpture). On the other hand, writers and musicians are able to think better in sounds; either in the simplified language of 8 sounds (music) or the more complex language of 24 sounds (words). They are able to explain emotions, sensations and temporal events with more complexity than ordinary people can, and with a higher sense of harmony, according to the natural laws of the Universe.

Mind-art, art of the human senses of space and time, the eye and the word, is clearly the highest level of knowledge man reaches about the Universe by his own linguistic means, with his soul-mind. In this manner, the wor[l]d becomes our soul-mind, the linguistic mirror that words and images craft on the Universe of atomic energy and information.

Even though man has 5 sensorial outlets to the Universe, it is important to distinguish between our “Energy senses” and “Informative senses”. The former might also evolve and create human goods to satisfy our perception (gastronomy, perfumes), but these can hardly inform us about the Universe, since their physiology allows them to accumulate only a small quantity of information. So they give way to simple sensorial objects. The Informative senses of the mind, eyes and words, accumulate thousands of times more information than the lower senses do. So they give birth to much more complex works of art. For that reason those works which relate to the higher senses of man are considered to be the classic arts in History.

However, in the present market-oriented society, the word “art” has been devaluated to allow the sale of many products which traders promote as art when they are mere crafts that do not evolve the human mind. This has an economic reason behind it; “a single genius is a single sale”. It is difficult to find enough truly creative works of art to invade the world market. Therefore the idea of converting any object into art and use the prestige of art to market industrial products, has expanded the notion of art beyond the products of the mind into many other things, from clothing to gastronomy, from images taken by machines to industrial design, of minimal creative content.

Man has existed for 150.000 years and he always considered art a sacred endeavor, and art works the most perfect or innovative forms perceived and recreated by the higher senses of the mind; words and images. Thus only products of “the eye-wor[l]d”, in its classical manifestations: literature, poetry, drama, prose, musical sounds, painting, sculpture and architecture, are considered art in this web. They are the seven arts of classical Greece, which the seven muses embodied.

The lower senses of man, those which have a limited perception of reality, (taste, touch, smell) blurred by the lack of distinct and clear information, create what we might call at best, lower art, forms of Human Goods, that should be promoted and reproduced as much as possible since they are truly the real wealth of nations, the goods mankind needs to survive: gastronomy, sex, textiles, perfumes… Yet precisely for that reason they cannot be unique, or special of a certain human mind, but common and available to all men, in a healthy body of history.


The style of an artist, and the style of a society.

The present earth is changing from a historic ecosystem of human social organisms based in human beings, human goods, and human art into a single ecosystem ruled by metal organisms, networks, and financial systems, that we might call the metal-earth.

The main effect of that change is the increasing obsolescence of human art and human minds, submissive today to the industrial design of software for thinking machines.

However in the past, in the ecosystems-organisms of history that we have called nations and civilizations, words, legal systems and art were far more important, because they were the informative networks of societies. Verbal and visual knowledge and Art were the mind of civilizations as historic organisms, organized by legal information, and religion.

And so art, as the social networks of information of civilizations, was not so much an individual phenomena, but a collective phenomena. And the artist felt himself with a social role, as the neuronal cells, the informative organs of his society. It was for that reason the art of any artist was basically similar, to the art of all other artists of its society. It was “style-art”, because the style, was the collective message of a civilization. Today however, because civilizations are no longer ruled by human minds, but by networks of financial information, by company-mothers and its lobbies, by networks of metal-minds that produce information in industrial processes, the artist no longer has a social role of relevance. So he is free of any collective style. The style that controls ideas of artists, exists however in radios, televisions, internets, and all other forms of industrial information. A style which is controlled, and tailored to produce the basic message of industrial societies: men have as only purpose to work=reproduce machines, and test=consume them. Of course this message is presented with al the rhetoric of beauty, and freedom necessary to hide the fact, that work and consume are not acts that necessarily develop and increase the human sensorial Freedom, but basically evolve and multiply machines. Yet the message has reached so much sophistication, that most human beings today, believe that to be a worker and a consumer is the paramount Freedom of mankind; while to evolve human senses, and enjoy Human Goods, and the pleasures of human existence   is either a “sin”, an act of “laziness”, and “weakness” and a “lost of time”. The fact is that all top predators in the Universe, exist to be lazy, lions of the savanna, enjoying the basic pleasures of his organism, to reproduce (sex-love), to feed energy [food, movement], and to receive its natural information (verbal thought and visual beauty in the human case). That is, the ideals of society before the industrial revolution – the ideals of Renaissance, and the aristocracy, top predator caste of that age. And vice versa, and ideal world dedicated to the freedoms of machines, will imply that men-slaves of machines would dedicate their time to the reproduction of machines (work) its evolution (industrial research) and its vitalization as species in movement (consume of machines that vitalize their existence).

So it is evident that the Freedom of the market, the Freedom of the economy, is the Freedom of machines and its company-mothers. While the biological Freedom of the citizen, of the human being, were the ideals expressed by the art styles  of historic civilizations. Those facts have of course enormous historic relevance, and explain why under such brain-washing propaganda, the classic historic, social, religious art and his aesthetic and ethic ideas, clash so deeply with modern ideologies of economical men and yet they were accepted and enjoyed by the citizens of Historic civilizations. They found in the social ideas of religious art, and the sensorial ideals of individual art, the pursuit of their self-realization as individual, biological human beings, and as part of a macro-social organism, a culture, or civilization, that social art harmonized, as nervous messages harmonize social cells in a body.

In all those cultures art was sacred, art was considered the informative network of the Historic organism. Art caused the evolution of the collective human mind. Art was the mind of civilizations, and acted in the social historic organism, as the nervous networks act in the human organism.

Art the informative mind of the civilizations. The canon of ethics and aestehtics


Since we have defined human art, as the visual and verbal perception olf space and time by the human ind, it fllows that collectiv e art was also visal and verbla rt, of colletive nature. And that collective nature imposed upon social art, two socila concepts: ethics and aesthetics of human nature. So classic art always had two basic forms, social ethic art, and individual aesthetic art, and two canons, moral, and beauty, carried by the word, and the eye of the human artist.

Today, even artists find those ideals, something of the past, because the artist today is not the valuator of reality, and has no ethic role. He does not educate the rest of the cells of society. So sacred art, religious art (which tried to create a social, harmonic morality among the different cells of society), even legal thought, has declined. Of course this has given individual Freedom to artists, to reflect their individual personality since nobody cares really anymore for what we, the artists, neurons of humanity, have to say.

Yet for most of history, Art has been a social phenomena, since men, lived in a social organism. The artist lived within a society. His ideas were similar to those of other artists of that society, fruit of customs and learning processes within that society. And so, the information that the mental cells of a civilization developed (the artistic information of a culture) was similar in most of the artists of a civilization. Styles in art gathered those similar mind-wor[l]ds, coming from people living in the same place, at the same time, as neurons work in the same manner, in the same organisms.

Individual art, the genius… and its relationship with social art

The style of an artist, is the peculiar way in which the mind of the artist, transforms the biological “Wor[l]d” of perception, that all humans have in common; the sounds and image we perceive as the Universe. While most people see reality under those biological limits, the artist goes beyond the subjective eye-Wor[l]d of the human species, and adds certain personal subjective changes to those images and words. This is the artist’s style.

The artist with his style goes beyond the “common way of perceiving reality”, and shows those other possible Worlds, that maybe some other species in some far away planet perceive directly (imagine a world where eyes see with the colors of a fauvist painter).

Still in the Earth, men see reality in a certain manner, and only artists are able to break with those conventions of the mind. Such individual artists are rightly called genius, since they create an entire new way of perception. When such new way of perception is meaningful, and harmonic, and can be understood at least partially by the audience, we have found an original artist.

Yet, in as much as men belong to social organisms, where they communicate in-form-ation to other human “cells” of the social organism, even individual genius, and its perception of reality, reproduces into works of art, that transmit the information to other “neurons” of the social organisms. In this manner, styles are transmitted, and create “schools” of art where many similar artist display the same style.

If the individual artist expresses its mind experience through its personal art, we can say that the society expresses its collective mind experience through schools of art.

If individual art is the evolution of the mental senses of the artist towards regions never explored by the common human mind, the style-art is the evolution of the collective mind of civilizations. It reflects the social mental state, of such civilization (as individual art reflects the mental state of the individual artist). In that sense, art becomes the collective mind of a civilization.

It is then clear that in classic history the role of artists was indeed sacred, fundamental, because verbal and visual artists, were in charge of recreating a Wor[l]d pleasant to man, where human social cells were in harmony, and shared as cells in any organism do, their vital information and energy. Ethic priests ruled the verbal minds of people with messages of love and ethics. Artists created beautiful environments, well constructed cities. Energy workers (farmers) fed the cells of the organisms. Literature educated the feelings of people, allowing bondage among individuals, at several levels (love, family, citizenship, religion). There was therefore a clear idea of what a social nation was, and what artists had to do in such society. That is why artists tried to find “canons” of beauty, that people would imitate, as role models.

The canons in classic art. What are ethics and aesthetics?

We can now understand the concept of a canon, both in verbal art (canon of ethics) and in visual art (canon of beauty). Today in individual art, when art is no longer the mind of civilizations, but science is, canons do not matter, but in the past, when art guided cultures, and took care of its survival and welfare, it was necessary and fundamental.

There was a canon of beauty in space, that had as element of reference the human form. Since we are humans, and we were top predators of the Earth, as all top predators do, we designed a Wor[l]d to our image and resemblance. So spatial arts, had as canon of beauty the proportions of human beings, and in its most beautiful creations (Greek, Italian art), that canon was respected, to create an environment in which man felt happy, in harmony with his surroundings, and dedicated to the pursuit of sensorial pleasure. This is the case of Greek and Renaissance sculpture and architecture.

There was also a canon of beauty in time, defined by the biological language of measure of time, that mankind uses: verbal thought.

How can we define beauty on time? It is self-evident, that if you ask anyone, what he would want to happen in time, he would say, “I want to survive”. So survival is indeed, the canon of beauty in time. And survival has in social thought a name: Ethics. Ethic societies that promote peace, and abhor war, do not die away. Societies that create systematically weapons end in civil wars, or in national wars. Thus, the people that were considered great artists of verbal thought in the past, were the prophets and writers that praised peace, and with poetic parables, preached the well being and harmony among human beings. Philosophy and religion were considered the highest forms of verbal thought. This, as we said no longer holds, since we are no longer ruled by words, but by numbers, by men, but by machines and prices. But we cannot ignore the fact that ethics and religious thought have controlled mankind. And the great artists of the word have been those prophets such as Jesus and Buddha, that talked against weapons and money, and praised love, and human senses. The artist is indeed the prophet, not the church, or the latter commentator. The master of the Word is Jesus, that defends a prostitute, and foresees that those “who kill by the sword, will die by the sword”, not the Catholic Church or Luther, and Calvin that acceptmoney and war, and repress sensorial love.

The quality of verbal art

As a consequence of the biological nature of languages, we cannot regard any longer verbal art, as a product, or a secondary commodity. “Literature for the sake of aesthetics; art for the sake of art” is far less relevant than “sacred art”, literature with an educational mission, either social literature and philosophy, or sensorial literature (fiction), which educates the senses and feelings of the people. There are qualities in the forms of literature, because literature has a function. Literature is not useless entertainment. Verbal Art is the biological language of mankind, and our societies. Its function is to mirror reality and explain the universe to man, from our own point of view, with the aim of helping human societies to survive. This means that we can qualify the quality of literature, according to such function.

It will be good literature, either legal, religious, fiction or logic literary art, a verbal construction that through its reading and practice, improves the capacity of an individual to behave ethically and in harmony with the other members of his society. It will be bad art, those literary and verbal forms that harm the harmony of societies.

So “War and Peace” is good art. So it is the “bill of rights” or the “Gospel”. They try to give the reader an “ethic sense of life” that favors peace over war; human rights over the rights of machines; and love and poverty, and despise for money and war, (the message of the gospel). Since history proves that those attitudes are positive for the survival of the individuals of society. On the other hand bad verbal art, is that art, which harms the energy and information of civilizations, pushing individuals against each other.

A typical script made in Hollywood that makes an apology of violence and murder is bad verbal art, regardless of its technological achievements. Its consequence is to multiply the use of weapons in our society, of technological species, that harm mankind.

The decalogue scripts of Polish director K. Kieslowski, are master pieces of filmed literature, despite its minimal technology because they make us reflect on the basic matters of love and life and death, far more important than the designed special effects of digital computers. A fascist law is also bad art. A religion which does not accept the equality of all men, a tribal religion of “chosen of God”, is also bad ethic verbal art. Since it allows war between tribes. Those facts are self-evident to any human being that thinks naturally about the purpose of art and verbal thought. They might collide with the “economic view”, that favors all forms of literature, specially those forms of literature, that multiply the use of machines, even weapons (economic and military nationalism, advertising, etc.)… according to the old lemma “you will defend me with your sword, and I will defend you with my word”.

Such art is considered here “rhetoric art”, bad literature, since its purpose is the opposite to the biological function of verbal thought. However in present societies most verbal art is rhetoric art, art that has neither a moral, ethic standing, or even any relationship with the reality of man as an individual or member of a human society. Why is that? Because words are no longer the language of information and power of our societies, a role that today belongs to money.

As a consequence, verbal thought is no longer the language of power, the sacred language, and it has no longer the role of guiding the survival of mankind. For that reason words enter in decadence, and loose “logic, realistic power”, becoming “fiction”, a language used to describe false realities. The value of things now is given by its price, not by its verbal meaning. And so mathematics describes reality, while words are used to describe fictions, and those realities of lesser power, such as the individual lives – no longer the social lives of people… Literature is now too often fiction, or science, or shallow I-literature, ego-trips and bio-pics of little relevance, or books on secondary senses and products (from gastronomy, to do-it-yourself manuals). Sacred literature has almost died away…

The function of visual art

What was the social role on that sacred view, of visual art? If we have considered verbal art, to be in charge of the temporal perception of a civilization, visual art, obviously will be in charge of the visual perception of such culture. Visual art therefore has also a human canon, an aesthetic, spatial canon, referred to the relative dimensions of man. If verbal art has to create temporal harmony among individuals, visual art has to create spatial harmony, beauty, in the space of that civilization.

Such is the classic vision of architecture and sculpture, urbanism and painting, even gardening, or agricultural development. All those arts that transform the space around us tried to create a harmonic environment in societies. And when both canons succeeded, we talk of a harmonic civilization in which ethics and aesthetics (the moral of the eye), favor a Wor[l]d built to the image and resemblance of mankind.

The function of art, is to shape the environment of man in a pleasant way. Yet since all measure in space and time is relative (Theory of Relativity), a pleasant space for man has the references of human size and form. To make of man the center of creation, the God of the Earth. This was understood perfectly by the theoretical minds of Renaissance, the last human culture, previous to the Industrial Revolution. The aim of renascence artists was to create ethics and aesthetics, for the Italian society. They worked hand in hand with the church in charge of the ethics of Christian societies. They tried to create “canons” of beauty as the gospel tried to create canons of ethics. They affirmed that men should try to achieve a mind and a body according to such canons. The artist, as the most complex mind of society, was the guide of the individual, which tried to achieve personal perfection as a human being, imitating those ethic and aesthetic roles, the artists showed him.

The destruction of the Renaissance caused by the evolution of gunpowder weapons, the creation of religions that worshipped money instead of words as the language of information of human societies (Calvinism, Anglicanism), and the beginning of science with its despise for human words and human eyes, meant the collapse of the artist as the guide of human societies.

The human paradise as the goal of history also was lost. A new culture, and a new civilization appeared, where the goal of history became the progress of the machine, and the human goal, the paradise of human senses, where “man is the measure of all things” was forgotten.

We are living the consequences of such mistake, in a world in which man no longer matters, where humans and words are submissive to mathematics and machines…

Yet only the best human minds, verbal priests, and social activists that follow the original ideas of his wor[l]d-masters, sensorial artists, that do not renounce to explore fully the human nature, and rebels of thought that do not accept the brain-washing of scientific myths, and market-propaganda, realize of the errors of our society.

The myth of superman

All this bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the metal masters, warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal (lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, ormoney, and metal-minds or scientific instruments).

Human Masters who “think more and see more”, are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race -its body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species- and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the “super-man”, not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal and as a consequence, they also corrupt art, which becomes another ‘informative’ myth, used to glorify animetal castes in power.

Technological art: evolution of metal-minds.

What about modern technological art? It is obvious, and we treat the theme when studying metal-communicators, that modern art is rhetoric art to the service of power, of people-castes and corporations.

In that regard, both the software of modern technological art, merely visual, evident, and based in ‘motion’, which implies violence and ‘skin views’, which implies racism, and the hardware – the machine that evolves digital thought, are NOT forms of human art but ‘ab=use’ human memes degrading art, since the age of TV (film still kept due to the difficulty and inclusion of multiple arts a high quality of human sensorial memes, bust mostly at an emotional, already lowering scale of awareness):

Screen Shot 2016-03-30 at 12.54.37
In the graph, the fundamental equation of Historic regression to the past is caused by the parallel massive evolution of the machine, and its mental chips that atrophy and substitute mankind, as they create a global super organism at an accelerated speed.
This means paradoxically in the side of mankind an increasing devolution and destruction into a field of entropic disorder, from the heights of social evolution reached in the age of European r=evolution (from the XVIII enlightened age to the Russian R=evolution and isms, aborted by fascism, stalinism and capitalism, all working together against the memes of freedom and eusocial love, art and the understanding of mankind as the only ‘nation of the species’)…
So one of the lamentable facts of the 7 cultures of the world today is that they have stopped its evolution into a single global system, and are regressing to past memes, which a mere 30 years before the chip radiation started in earnest were dimmed as relics of the past, customs without more importance than to be an excuse to get together and conserve art and architecture (religious ceremonies, conserved as an empty carcass of a bygone previous phase of the eusocial evolution of man).
So as we study the 7 cultures of mankind and its collective minds, we will also study the negative side of them, the animetal part of the cultures that are fighting and winning in the process of degeneration of all those cultures. In the next ultra-repeated graph we can see above the origin of the 7 cultures of mankind in its positive and negative sides.
Equalization, hypnosis and degradation of human time.
In terms of human time existence, the fundamental property of those globalised trends of digital mass art, except the work of a few isolated artists, has a meaning: to maintain the increasingly obsolete human mind-species in a state of passive acceptance of the system, misusing its life in a lethargic state that with the arrival of violent video-games and 3D Virtual hypnotic fictions will render humans totally atrophied in its capacity to react against the system and its growing obsolescence to machines:

Screen Shot 2016-07-09 at 01.05.15

The graph from the 92 book ‘the extinction of man’, shows truly what fiction means, the extinction in life of most of the active existence of human beings hypnotised by screens that deactivate their eusocial love with selfish messages – you kill for money resumes the meaning of most telefilms, and instil the animetal idol-ogies of the system, mechanism, abrahamic cults, nationalism and worship of money.

Now this trend has extended in the process, of ‘murdering’ of art by markets and Warhol-style propaganda and advertising art. So the process of death of visual art is really advanced.

And what is more telling, as the price of trash-art, Warhol industrial mechanical posters, overcomes that of the best eclectic artist of the post-photograph age of inward, baroque informative eclectic art, Mr. Picasso, we can be sure that not even ‘critiques’ and collectors do understand the meaning of human sacred art.

art modern

In the graph, the last age of human art, was the eclectic, inward, informative 3rd age of human I=eye Wor(l)ds, which peaked with Picasso destruction of the outer world forms of the visual eye, improved by machines, by the internal mind ‘ I paint thoughts’ he said.

After that, there was a long silence broke by the hijacking of art by industrial systems of reproduction of photographs, which plagued the American post- Pollock/Hooper, non-artistic age of ‘Fakes’, perfectly described by Orson Welles, in his film on art markets. Warhol and his series of audiovisual, mechanical artists, with minimal human information (The Beatles copying Beethoven chords and put silly simple words, such as ‘I love you’, in every other word), shows clearly that art started with the arrival of audiovisual media a massive simplification previous to the present degeneration of art into electronic music, repetitive beats and minimalist thought.

Craft still exists.

So the best art today is either happening in 3rd world societies (as the Dakkar biennale shows) or in the regression to simple crafts, which have more value than a Wharhol poster. It is a root grass movement of normal people doing good imitative art, given the fact that the search for sacred art and humanist art is exhausted, and the role models of society are ‘eviL people’, intensely fighting for the destruction of all human values, pursuing those digital values of the ‘language of money’ that treat men as object.

Evilwood is NOT art, trust me. I arrived there with Mr. Pitt and Mr. Mandel, actor and producer, and a script hired to write for them and stay around for a decade. In a perfect world, Hollywood would be a holly-sacred place of astounding artistic films enhancing the nature of mankind, and a bigger number of documentary pieces.

As it is today is just the idol-ogical branch of the FMasters and the Military-Industrial Globalized Complex of corporations.

How can we classify the third type of products that the market today sells as “art”, and are neither Human Goods, not Human evolutionary visual/verbal art?

They are either crafts and industrial designs that use forms of energy and information of minimal complexity, (geometrical cycles and lines) easy to be mass-produced, with machines. They are also creative forms, such as photographs or computer art, which are new, evolved images that seem to have the characteristics of sacred art, yet lack the fundamental element of human art: the human mind is not the main creator of those forms, but a machine, a “metal-head” is. That is they are metal-mind art, the art of machines, the art of science…

In that sense we have to differentiate the human method of verbal/visual knowledge, the art of the human mind, that uses words and eyes to understand the Universe, with the method of knowledge that animetal scientists use to perceive the universe of space and time: the scientific method.

If both art and science search for knowledge of space and time, then what is the main difference between the two of them? The difference is radical, when we realize that art and science use different sensorial instruments of perception to search for that knowledge. Art uses the biological organs of mankind to understand space and time. The word, our biological language that measures time, is used in art to express thoughts and ideas about the passing of time, and its 3 dimensions, past, present and future, which verbs mirror with its 3 temporal forms. The eye, our biological organ of perception of space, is used in art to define our understanding of the three dimensions of spatial reality, width, length and depth (created in 2-dimensional painting with perspective or cubist deformation).

On the other hand, science uses sensorial organs which are not human organs, but machines, made basically of another type of atoms, metal. So we can baptize the organs of perception of science, “metal-minds”. They are “metal-sensorial organs”, machines that perceive time (clocks and computers) and machines that perceive space (telescopes, microscopes, cameras).

We could say that art is knowledge through human senses, and science is knowledge through metallic senses. It follows that arts evolve the human perception of the universe, while science evolves the perception of machines. And so, thanks to science, the primitive systems of temporal perception of machines (the clocks of Mr. Galileo) have become computers. And the primitive first “metal-eyes” of Mr. Galileo, founder of modern science (his telescopes), have become today the sophisticated cameras we see all around us.

If we are strict in our classic, biological definition of art, the languages and images which cannot be reproduced by human minds and humans hands are not human art. So science and its machines does not produce human art. Please leave aside your western ideologies that worship machines, and consider machines abstract species. Technological art is not “a creation of the human mind”, but of a “metal-mind”. And the role of man in its creation will always be secondary to the role of the machine.

If in a painting, the canvas is the passive element, and the painter the active element, in a computer-designed art form, or a photography, the human mind plays the role of the passive “canvas” adapting his style to the properties of the machine. And the active creator is the machine, which imposes his language to the “craftsman”.

So we have to be much more exigent with technological crafts to consider them a form of human art. Only those forms of technological art focused in the human experience, that require a lot of human creativity (such as “art films”, or some photographic work by masters like Cartier or Capra), can be seriously consider a technological form of human art.

The other forms of technological crafts, specially those created with computers, or related to mere mathematical, and digital shapes, belong to the “lower arts”. We call them crafts because their human content is minimal. To disguise those obvious truths, the technological artist rhetorizes his work and markets it with arrogant statements to make-belief that he is the only artist, and the machine a mere extension of his mind, not a metal-mind with his own linguistic properties (the language is the message).

That anthropocentric concept of technological art, might be true, of art made with “primitive metal-minds” (classic film-making). Yet the arrival of computers and special effects gives predominance to the machine over the human manipulator. So today Hollywood films are made by computers, according to the computer and metal-eye properties that seek higher movement and hence violence, brutality with the human body, and distortion of human feelings with dramatic effects. They are genres imposed by the machine not by the artist.

Today the arrogance of the animetal artist grows as his role in the act of creation diminishes. So we can hear sentences, such as those of a well-known Asian video artist, that considers his last work of electronic distortions, his entering on “a sublime period, like the great French gothic cathedrals”. Or the sentences of a well-known computer mogul, that considers the 010011 crunching of his software programs, “a form of creative art, like anything the great masters have ever done”. Or the evil=anti-live sentences of the father of robotics, that says he wants to play god, and construct a species superior to the human mind…

In technological crafts as in market-art, rhetoric and the cult to the machine, takes over real human creativity. Animetals can occupy their creativity in whatever they want, specially when they pursuit money and fame, which are market-oriented concepts, but we cannot pretend to make Leonardos of Animetals, children of human thought, working with Basic, Adobe Photoshop, or a video-monitor… to the risk of loosing any perspective on the nature of our human mind, and the importance that human art has to develop the human soul, our sense of ethics and aesthetics, in freedom of thought.

complex version: hierarchical i-scalesA more complex view.

A more detached view though is the higher perspective of the laws of the bio-ethic laws of the organic Universe, a level of comprehension I rarely bring to this web, as it might seem ‘too far out’ for those who ignore all about General Systems Sciences. Yet it is necessary to understand the perfect man to compare and put into perspective each of our souls and that of those we observe riding us with the 4 apocalypse horses (myths are always metaphors of higher truths which give a poetic perspective)…

So let us try… The Universe is a ‘System’ made of organisms of energy and information, from physical systems, made of an informative particle moved over a body/field of energy, to human beings, made of informative heads moved by energetic bodies, to societies ruled by a neuronal class in control of our languages of social power, (money and words, and its submissive energetic language of weapons which money and words always command), which direct a body mass of working middle classes…

This must be understood – the pantheist universe constructs its ultimate laws of science and all its sub-sets of beings, made to the image and likeness of the whole departing from that simple duality.

And so to survive it selects those entities with a more perfect ‘body’ of maximal energy, brain of maximal information and the system that maximizes both, Max. E x Max. I, which mathematically happens when E=I  (so for a total of 10, 5×5=25 > 6×4=24>7×3=21, etc.)

Now departing from those laws of General Systems, applied to human beings, there is a potential perfect man,  which maximizes those 3 survival functions:

– A man of maximal Bravery; Max. E, or mental energy to challenge the wrongs of life by applying its Intelligence (max. Information), to create an ethic and aesthetic balance (E=I), between truth (Max. Information) and Happiness (Max. strength) – yes, good people who help others have been proved by experiments to be happier, to emit more oxytocin, the drug of love and happiness). 

This simple function: Max. E -> Max. I -> Max E=I, defines the survival species of reality creating a perfect world of maximal ethics and beauty, the canon of being human (which we observe in ‘classic forms’ of aesthetics and ethics, that is of art and literature, with balance between energy and form, or in the 2nd age of maturity of any entity).

Now this simple function is broken, because E=I, ethics and aesthetics of human origin have been SUBSTITUTED by the ethics and aesthetics of the machine that destroy our collective social, ethic mind.

Thus the function of bio-ethics, of a human civilization based in the values of man, which is explained all the ‘messages’ of all the prophets of history worth to mention is now gone. But that does not mean that the search for human beauty and ethics, the natural goal of our species is not truth. It is and it will always be. So there will always be as long as humans exist in the past, present and future among the highest minds those who seek to define and practice the conduct of the perfect man, guided by the survival balance and sense of justice of the Universe, represented in our species by human ethics and aesthetics, E=I:

For example in Plato is the ‘idea of man’, the ideal man which is our potential perfect man, of which each of us, is a mere shadow, reflection in the ‘cave’, parable of the Mind of God, the Logos, or rational laws of the Universe, of that perfect man. Socrates expressed it also with its life and dictum that ‘an intelligent man (max. I) can only be a good man (E=I)’

In non corrupted Abrahamic Religions, he is the prophet, the canon of which all of us must be a reflection, trying to achieve his perfection.  This was better expressed in the great philosophers of the first age of christianity before ‘animetal cultures’ of gold and weapons degraded this religion, from Orestes to Saint Augustine, in its ‘citadel’. Here the function most cherished is E=I (Ethics).

It was expressed from Confucius (Jen Man) and Mo-Ti to Buddha in all the Eastern religions. And here as in Plato we find a close description of this Jen/Buddha man, in its 3 functions (the right fold path)

It will be again expressed by neo-platonic renaissance which stressed the 3rd final function of balance and beauty, as the Greek-Latins did (mens sana in corpore sanum).

It was NOT, expressed, contrary to belief in most prophets of the Jewish-Protestant culture,  since the Old testament is hihgly polluted by selfish tribal memes of go(l)d and war; but Moses and other prophets of the Isaiah cycle brought us the closest image of it.

So we had to wait till the French-American R=evolution and all those who imitated those Founding Fathers of modern ethics (including the marxist r=evolutionary man).

And so the Ideal, Canonical, Rightful, R=evolutionary ‘Perfect’ man exists at least in the mind of the poets of love that use the ethics of the wor(l)d to guide and create by imitation and right action, a critical mass of perfect men.

On that view modern humans and their animetal, mechanical cultures must be qualified as the Imperfect men, hence once that will not survive, because the Universe is perfect and only selects those perfect species who are made to the image and likeness of its logos, that a few of those men we quoted understood, because they had in themselves the seeds of the perfect man.

But the Universe and its selective system is both deterministic (as there are rules and laws that define what survives in the future) but also probabilistic (as a perfect universe should even forgive those who are imperfect, yet allowing them also a minimal probability of existence; hence most men are born potentially perfect, good Rousseaunian savages).

We are in that ‘Sigma 2’ using again mathematical terms of the more complex level of equations of bio-history (that dream of Asimov, which I resolved two decades ago and have seen unfolding every time ever since).

That is, we are the tail of the imperfect man, a planet with no critical mass of ethics, inteligence and aesthetics.



My mind.

MY MIND IS obviously this blog And this blog  is the organic Universe in a nutshell. So why my mind has found all this? The answer is of course that my mind is part of the culture I belong to as I have shown in the previous graphs.

And so which is this mind is obvious – the organic mind of the 2 cultures that most influenced me, the mediterranean culture and the taoist, Chinese culture, which I learned in my youth travels in indochina.

BUT THIS IS not the mind of most humans today, which we must regard, as ‘technological minds’ or ‘enzymen’, whose real job for very long has been rather making machines.

So the duality of Human historic vs. Animetal minds run very deep in this blog as they explain the paradox of history, observed in the next graph:



And so I started to see humans as ‘homunculus ants’ perfectly programmed with its big mouths, bit hands and peanut brains to do only machines, measure things, plug data into computers and talk with their big mouths and peanut brains about how astonishingly superior, intelligent above heavens and earth their ‘egos’ are… And SO my response was dual – on the side of my relationship with other humans I became very arrogant and indifferent, closing for very long all intellectual communication with them; on the side of the Universe I went  further into the taoist, humble realization we were nothing but dust of space-time. You can call it a ‘bipolar reaction’, to the Homunculus which WRONGLY despises the Universe and thinks is above it, and to the Universe, who despises the Homunculus, rightly and as it IS above it, it is going to crunch it soon and throw it to the garbage of history, as soon as AI and robots take over…  Hence other name for this bipolar theory:


Absolute relativity.

Regardless of the fact nobody cares, and likely is just a distorted mirror on the absolute information the universe holds on itself, I repeat to the homunculus which should by now abandon the web offended (: what I have written in a very resumed form is the biggest advance on philosophy of science since Galileo discovered the mechanical method, added to the experimental method of Aristotle, the power of sensorial machines to perceive the Universe – along the development of mathematical tools more proper to mirror the measures of machines; in as much as it adds the organic elements of the Universe to the mixture, giving a much more rounded meaning to the different species of science, and completing the understanding of time and space.

So you might wonder why nobody cares about it. Of course I do also wonder after decades of having discovered the 5th dimensional Universe and tried – intermittently – to give it to the scholar world. Oh, yes, we know the explanations – the nature of scientific r=evolutions (Kuhn), the relatively artist nature of lonely researchers, etc. But the fact remains to put it in common language, that NO HUMAN I have ever met gives a FUK about the most astounding explanation of the meaning of existence, the ultimate question ANY RATIONAL, humble, INTELLIGENT MIND SHOULD CARE. Nobody, None, Nope, zero.

So after the permanent depression in which that realization throw me decades ago with 173 rejections to my earlier self-printed book on the matter, ‘the error of Einstein’… besides becoming a lost soul, now sick and tired, hoping at least to leave a trace of all this in http://www.unificationtheory.com – the mnemonic name for this web…

I had obviously to take two paths, either reject my work, which I did for 2 decades, caring nothing about it, going intermittently into social activism, sex, drugs and R&R and dolce fare niente, I obviously changed my view on humans as rational, intelligent beings and developed the whole model of history and memetics, which came to account for the extraordinary limits of humanity in all what concerns and compares with the extraordinary intelligence of the Universe, except for an obvious feature – the astounding arrogance and sense of self-entitlement of the species, which knows NOTHING and thinks it knows EVERYTHING… not to speak of its morality, thinking the individual particle not the network is the protagonist of history; or its religions where he is the center of the Universe, or its chosen one, or the only intelligence.

All this is garbage. Humans are nothing. We are all dust of space-time and the only remarkable intelligence is that of the Universe itself:

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the latter’ Einstein, one of the few exceptions that confirm the rule.

To be frank for quite long now I have not considered my mind belonging to the humind species. Its logic is No longer Aristotelian, of a single arrow causality; its geometry is Not euclidean, its ethics is NOT individualistic, its interest is not in other humans but in the TAO of nature. But that gives me the sole objective capacity to judge humans and do social sciences too. So let us start with the obvious – why huminds (ab. human mind) don’t give a FUK about reality as IT IS.

We humans have a defect so obvious that when we liked religions it became the original capital sin – arrogance. We really think we are a unique species, and our intelligence can only compare to that of God. The paradox of the ego is easy to understand in rational terms, when we know what minds do: to stop reality into a still linguistic image of the Universe (visual, verbal, mathematical) in which we see ONLY the language not the universe in its infinite size and motion.

In the human case that mind has 2 fundamental languages of space and time the ultimate substances of reality:

Visual images, and its geometric mathematical simplification which describe space.

And temporal verbs, words and its simplification, logic.

So the human mind is an I=eye (space language)>wor(l)d (time language), which measures space with visual eyes and time with verbal words. And its formal languages, mirrors of the spacetime Universe, are mathematics and logic.

This a priori linguistic ‘screen’ between the limited information of the mind and the ∞ Uni verse is what cause our paradox of the ego who thinks to be infinite. So we can write an ‘equation of the linguistic mind’ that defines the ego paradox: 0 x ∞ = Constant. Indeed, in terms of the mind the ‘limiting equation’ of algebra writes:

O: Infinitesimal self centered mind languages x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant still mapping of the world.

So the infinitesimal mind confuses the infinite Universe with its linguistic image or ‘WORLD’, which is one for each infinitesimal mind – ‘each point has a world in itself’, said Leibniz. But as we think our mind-world IS the Universe and our mind world makes OUR NOSE bigger than Andromeda, we are built up to have a HUGE EGO, distort reality and DENY organic, living properties to the rest of the moving, temporal Universe we ‘stop’ on our mind. So the Earth moves but we see it still. The earth is NOT the center of the Universe but we feel it is the center and so on.

So even before we start talking, if you can’t swallow that pill and realize that your ego cheats you into thinking you are the center; but in objective science, you are nothing but dust of space-time, we cannot make science. Since the problems of the ego do NOT solve with reason. As it is about being happy not finding truths.

Science is NOT happy – the reinforcing program of the ego, but objective and has the advantage that it ‘exists’. The ego, and the mind-world does NOT. It is a mathematical infinitesimal, a ‘zero’. And to fit all in a zero, everything is still in the mind because the kills its motion to focus on what is interesting for your survival – food moving, other humans who are ‘so important’ as you, etc. BUT science tells us we are only dust of space-time, like everything else in the organic Universe, where all is relative, nothing matters more.

And so what science tell us is that man HAS No importance in the Universe, as we are neither its center in space, or time or even scale, the last discovery of ‘absolute relativity’:

 In the graph, the fundamental characteristic of reality is its Absolute relativity, without preferential position, form or scale of size; as we are all Organic Points of space-time.
So science has been always an objective struggle against the never-dying subjective happiness of humans wanting to be the center of the Universe. First the absolute center chosen by the creator (Abrahamic religions). Then the center of space (earth-centric astronomy). Next the creator of the languages of the Universe (Pythagorean, quantum religions). And yet, none of those subjective truths is real. We have no immortal form in time, as evolution proved. We are not created with any special role. We are ‘a rock lost in a corner of the infinite cosmos, and departing from those facts we can talk about man’ (Schopenhauer) and of lately quantum realism proves that the Universe is real not a mathematical construct of the quantum observer. Finally the organic, fractal nature of reality makes no scale preferential.
But most humans still find some excuse to consider themselves ethnocentric, egocentric, earthcentric, timecentric and scalecentric.
In that sense,  the attitude of mankind respect to the much more intelligent, densely informative and complex Universe, which becomes ‘reduced’ to the human selfish perspective, without much ado – always in its center, first of location, then of evolution, now of ‘intelligence’… has a rational explanation – the paradox of the ego –  and its the biggest handicap for a scientific evolution of humind’s (ab. human mind=world) knowledge. to adapt our ‘limited world’ to the larger laws of the fractal organic Universe, the only possible philosophy of science.

Since only an organism is self-generated and does not need a god-maker to put the machine at work; so the alternative ‘mechanist theory’ of science, in place since Kepler’s huge ego-trip, a mixture of Biblical creationism and physicists’ mechanism, so obvious in the big-bang theory of a Universe born of a huge explosion from an infinitesimal mind-dot, is NOT science BUT A CLEVER modern form of religion.

Indeed, all abstract mechanist theories of the Universe are hidden deist religious theories, which need a maker to exist – and data as we show in our articles on the big-bang is subtly chosen and bent to cater to that ‘dogma’. Point.



 The stock-market, financial brain of the super-organism of the Metal-earth.

Let us  consider an overview of the organic structure of the Financial complex as an organism independent of man, with a financial/informative brain which processes with monetary flows the information about the components of the organism, selecting the species of machines and other metal-memes it will reproduce, those that will become extinct and which corporations will receive further ‘monetary energy to continue its re=productive tasks. In the graph, today most of the computer power of the world is in the hands of companies and financial systems, organized by those who control the stock markets. In the graph, Stocks help the self-integration of the metal reproductive ecosystem, beyond the restrictions of the human mind. Artificial Intelligence is not a copy of human intelligence. It is an adaptation of the functions of nervous thought, of the human mind to different kinds of machines. Artificial Intelligence is born in companies as an internal brain that directs the body of the economic organism.

The homology between stock markets and brains or DNA systems is based in the bio-logical nature of economies, and company-mothers.

The graph describes the basic energy-information networks of Bio-economies ruled by stock-money. Stock holds, as brains do, most of the ‘code-language of information’ of the ecosystem. The brain will use that code to produce certain carbohydrates which are useful to the cell.

Stock has license to print money and will allocate them to the mother-companies of new technology with maximal price (weapons) of maximal reproductive power=Max. sales = Max. profits, such as digital software or maximal volume (energy).

Thus in this manner stock-markets express with money the arrow of evolution of the super-organism of machines, expanding its energy/information neetworks, its informative, audiovisual machines, its reproductive systems and its weapons.

On the other hand, human goods require human work, have minimal price by lack of affinity with metal-money values and are perishable, produce lesser monetary profits and are scorned by stock-speculators, which give no credit to all the products that could create a sustainable world.

In this manner the stock-market constantly deviates the wealth of humankind towards the reproduction and evolution of the memes of metal and the small elite of mechanist scientists, capitalist bankers/economists and corporation of machines, which during this age of crisis have further enlarged the gap between the FMI elite and the rest of the humankind. Yet because economic experts work for the FMI and have as dogma that the evolution of machines is the future of mankind, there is no criticism against policies, which are ‘de facto’ extinguishing this planet.

This was in the first age of the FMI complex carried about by human networks of traders/bankers, military people and scientists. In the next graph we can see the ‘historic age’ of human networks of traders and stockrats, or capitalist/religious age, when the Jewish-Protestant empire was created:


In the graph, the globalization of the Financial system, in which the stock-market invents money for free first as stock-paper then as ticker money and finally as electronic money, departing from Holland, the 1st ‘biblical corporative’ cult(ure), mother of the FMMI system that today rules the world. Since even if in other countries the structure of the Financial-Media system is not so clear, with the globalization of the world, the entire planet by imitation or alliance are ruled by the American Financial-Media system, except the Chinese block and to a certain extent its allies or those cultures who are opposed to America, Russia and Islamic and African nations are not totally ‘owned’ and brain-washed by American media.

Then those processes became integrated in corporations of scientific machines and weapons, ruled by paper-money. Yet humans were still in charge, albeit slaves of their mechanist, capitalist and nationalist ideologies. Today the process is being transferred to all type of software programs, networks of machines, automated systems of reproduction and enhanced by the last ‘batch’ of ideologies of technology (productivity, ‘just wars’, mechanist science).

The end of the process is obvious: once all biological process of evolution and reproduction of the FMI system are transferred into software, the Metal-earth will be born.

Politicians do not understand that the stock-market and the human economy are different systems. The 1st is based in flows of electronic money, the 2nd in printed currencies. What the present explosion of electronic money derivatives is doing is deviating massively wealth from the human economy to the economy of corporations and paper-money. The inflated value of corporations and networks of information of the FMI-metal system and the chronic undervaluation of human goods and salaries is neither just from a human p.o.v. nor should be tolerated in democracies, but it is happening because the FMI complex has always predated over the human, life-based agricultural world.

Today it is not as obvious as when kings and tax-collectors exploited directly people, but the process is essentially the same: money is invented as e-data very easily in markets, through speculation and financial derivatives. While people receive printed money which grows far slower. So the wealth of corporations and bankers multiplies geometrically and the wealth of the human ecosystem of life goods arithmetically. In the past 30 years stock-markets have multiplied for 100 the value of stocks and derivatives, provoking a massive inflation in all human goods, while salaries have merely increased in a 1 to 10 scale. The result is like a parasite that were absorbing the blood of the human super-organism, provoking the endemic scarcity of human goods and poverty of the human mass.

For that reason the only possible reversal of that process would be the nationalization of the entire financial Industry, the creation of massive deficits in printed money, achieved with the creation of a global currency, ¥€$ money, fusioning yuans, yens, euros and dollars, and a 30% annual deficit by governments. This quantity of money similar to the quantity of money corporations add for free to their valuations through speculative markets of invention of e-money would allow the creation of a global minimal salary to jack up demand in basic human goods consumed by the poor and the inversion in projects that create a sustainable world (clean energies, infrastructures, education, public transport, tourism).

This economic measure coupled with a military reduction of budgets and expansion of UNO and EU like organizations and diplomatic forums, and/or a triad of EU-US-Chinese leadership, applying the science of bio-history to the design of an efficient superorganism of mankind in control of the FMI complex could halt the self-suicidal path in which mankind has entered, by trusting blindly without any understanding the evolutionary process of machines, weapons and money, we call ‘the free market’. Yet the free market is not free, it is an evolving complex system that preys on Gaia, life beings and the 90% of human beings, who do not profit directly from the sale of weapons and the invention of e-money in stock markets that have made corporations the dominant institution of the world with enough credit to cre(dit)ate a world to the image and likeness of machines.

In the 3 technological cycles, NYSE’s curve of machine’s stock population follows the same chair-like curves of biological populations; since each machine is a biological organism that finds ‘econiches’ in war and labor fields, substituting and consuming its rival human beings, workers and soldiers or as consumption machines, when they are consumed by humans to enhance our energy/information skills.


If we treat machines as collective species, analyzing their global population through the stock price of their company mothers, those graphs are self-similar to the Volterra curves of re=production and extinction of  any living species. Since for companies a population of machines means an amount of sales and profits that determine their stock price. Thus:

Stock-prices=sale-profits=re-production of machines.

Thus, the biological stock-curve that shows the reproduction and extinction of machines is its company’s sales or profit curve, directly proportional to the value curve of the company and the population curve of the ‘species’ of machines is that of its industrial sector in the stock market.  The graph compares those 2 curves for electronic machines and its 3 phases:

—     For a long period the machine (or species) evolves slowly in the labs of companies or inventors. It is equivalent to the slow period of mutations that will bring a new species into being (allopatric evolution)..

Then, the machine matures and its costs of reproduction plummet. The machine now occupies an econiche in the human world, substituting a certain human organic function, and consumers multiplt its sales exponentially. It is the takeoff of the machine. Since it starts from a very low population, prices now multiply very fast, so investors make the highest profits.

—     Yet, sooner than later, given their exponential rhythm of production, far superior to the increase of human population, machines saturate the consumer market. Since symbiotic species depend on the population of the species they associate to those machines are organic enhancers of our energetic or informative power, the ‘vital space’ of machines is the total human population with resources to buy them. Thus, once the machine saturates the ecosystem of mankind, if re=production continues, profits and sales diminish and companies accumulate inventories. At that point their sales and stock market curves decline. Again in Nature, one species that has overpopulated its vital space, suffers a population crash, as it has also depleted its ‘preys’ and cannot longer feed itself. The population finally reaches a balance with their prey and it becomes stable. So happens with stock-market curves of machines that become flat.

At this point in Nature a species cannot increase its population unless it mutates into a new, more efficient species that can feed on new preys. That is exactly what happens to the machine: After the overpopulation crisis, the machine mutates into a weapon and continues expanding its ecosystem, preying over human beings, no longer symbiotic to them.

– It is the third age or military age of the machine that is used now for war. So the trains of the Age of machine bodies become armored trains and colonialism becomes the ideology of the XIX c., the cars of the 29 crash become tanks and Hitler uses them to conquer Europe an the pcs of the American age become predators in a new age of colonialism against the poor. Again what matters is not the ‘memetic ideologies of the FMI complex’ that convince a certain nation to use those weapons, but the fact that those wars keep evolving the FMI complex and destroying the world of Gaia and non-technological cultures.

Unfortunately the same companies that make machines make weapons so their lobbies merely back military politicos and corrupted governments enter the game. Now the cycle of economic growth is based on Keynesian militarism: weapons are bought and death begins. Since weapons destroy themselves quickly in the battle front and must be renewed, the increasing demand of machines multiplies the benefits of companies. G.M. multiplied by 8 its profits, making tanks in W.W. II. So war becomes the economic engine of the last 36 year period, a Kondratieff cycle.

Company-mothers govern the world with a single aim: to re=produce machines. Among them, the most powerful ones reproduce top predator weapons. So, in as much as we can analyze company-mothers as reproductive organisms with biological cycles, called business cycles, we can find out, studying those reproductive cycles of machines, specifically of weapons, when there will be enough top predator weapons re=produced in our ecosystem, to cause war.

Modern wars are economic processes, embedded in the very same structure of ‘monetary and machine reproduction’. Indeed, the evolution of technology makes each new lethal machine much more efficient killing humans, there is also a progression in the number of casualties that each World War causes; which can be directly related to the growth of the stock-market that shows the price-quality of both, consumption machines and weapons; since in war ages ALL the machines of the system are weapons and the market reaches its maximal value. Yet since weapons consume human beings there is a parallel progress on the value of stock-markets that 100-fold each cycle of evolution of machines and the number of causalities in war that 100-fold each cycle. The progression, as most evolutionary increases of power in the Universe, is decametric: in each new World War, 102 times as many people die than in the previous one: 600.000 died in the Railroad wars at the end of the I Kondratieff cycle. 60 million people died in W.W. II. In the next cycle of war, the Age of the Singularity, when the first self-reproductive nano-robots, or the Final Weapon, the black hole of the Nuclear Industry appears at CERN, 6000 million, the entire human population, might die.

3. The overproduction age of chips that expel us from labor and war fields.


In the graph, from an old book (the extinction of man, 92), when i used the ‘hard language’ of mathematical space-time vectors to describe the FMMI superorganism we can see how worldstock in its western section, Wall street, acts as the ‘informative black hole’ of the Metal-Earth controlling with flows of money the 3 sub-vectors of:

– Energetic machines (weapons-transports) with center in Detroit.

– Informative machines (blue), with center in the West coast.

The graph highlighted what were at the time the leading 3 sub-corporations of each sector, as systems always end up having 3 top sub-systems specialized in energy, information and reproduction.

The human factor, the A-merican, Aristotelian believer was considered irrelevant as he will always follow under its go(l)d religions (jewish-protestant religions mathematized by classic economists) that he must obey his single Go(L)d, without understanding it (‘people must be kept ignorant to remain obedient’ said calvin…

3 crisis

Now we can return to the initial graph of this section that describe the overproduction phase of chips, the age of the FMMI superorganism in which we live.

In essence, the recurrent long terms, 72 year crisis of the economy go through the same phases.  The phase that now starts is the ruin of the different demand-based  welfare states of the economy which no longer has a viable credit system to support a sustainable growth.

In the 20s the currency crisis peaked in Germany during the hyper-inflation age.

Now again the crisis has started in Europe and Germany with its null understanding of ‘human values’ and the needs of people have triggered it with extreme capitalist, anti-deficit laws that forbid the creation of demand-based government deficits to create a new deal that solved the stagnation of the economy.

Yet in the present cycle America plays the role of Germany and China the role of America. Thus what we have seen in Greece is only the beginning. The true currency crisis will take place when the Yuan becomes convertible and the entire planet ditches the dollar as the international currency as it happened in the 1920s when it substituted the Deutsche Mark and the Pound for the dollar. Then America will suffer an age of hyper-inflation, lost of purchase power, as the trillions of dollars created by the Treasury return home, multiplying the quantity of money inside the states that will loose value; and the market panic ditches Treasuries for Chinese money and bonds.

And yet ignorant of the basic laws of the economic ecosystem, our ‘Treasure department’ insists that China makes the Yuan convertible and rises its value, in a self-suicidal process that will bring in the late 2010s the decline of America as economical power, and an internal social and political crisis, seen in the past cycles, when a nation looses its top predator status, with an international currency that always has unlimited rights to invent money for free.

Indeed, when Spain lost that right to Holland and the bullion plummeted in value it entered in a civil war (1640). When France lost that status at the end of the Indian/American wars in the 1750s it soon entered into the French R=evolution. And when Germany lost that status, Hitler raised to power.

Thus we are moving as it happened after the 1857, 1929 and 2001 crash, into an age of war for profits, with any ideological excuse. After the 1857 crash, trains were armored and used in wars against Indians or to conquer Africa. After the 1929 crash Hitler started the reproduction of tanks instead of cars.

This situation which parallels that of the 30s during the Republican administration (Mr. Obama and the Euro-zone presidents are in economical terms to the right of Coolidge) implies that we do not longer live in a Democracy but in a plutocracy, where companies and their owners stockrats have the exclusive rights to print the language of power, money, as aristocrats had the exclusive rights to bear arms in kingdoms. And for that reason, because consumption of peaceful machines has plummeted companies promote the creation of weapons and war that keeps giving profits.

After the 2001 crash computers were used to create a ‘big brother’ security state, with the excuse of terrorism. History rhymes. The tribes on top change but the ‘engines’ of our technological civilization, greed and violence, fostered by money and weapons, have not changed. It is thus absurd to focus on tribal rivalries, and point out to this or other tribe, but much more intelligent to understand the systemic cycles. Indeed, little difference there is between the British, American and French treatment of Negroes and Indians in the XIX fascist age or the treatment of jewish and slavs in the XX c. fascist age, or the treatment of Palestine in the XXI c. except the fact that we are now in our neo-fascist age, and so the control of information about our neo-fascist age is far deeper than the one we make of past eras, which are ‘history’; and the dates… We are at the beginning of the Jewish-American fascist age, in the earlier 30s, so our neo-Disraelis and neo-Hitlers have not yet exterminated our ‘primitive enemies’… Yet as the trends of history continue, and the new awesome weapons of the singularity age, robots and Cosmic bombs are developed, it is to be expected that in a few years the number of causalities of this fascist age will increase…



In the graph the Rainbow Planet & its 7 modern cultures derived from historic, memetic beliefs, AS THEY are being carved in the process of globalisation of the FMMI system of corporations.

In the perfect world, one ruled by social scientists not people-castes of power, the first conscious decisions of all global politicians will be National reform: Cultures NOT nations should be the political units of the rainbow planet. So power would be transferred upwards to the heptarchy of 7 cultures and downwards to the regional ‘communities’ the way the new-humanism wishes (new left party and young movement in Europe – Indignados/podemos in Spain being the most clear case and America – Occupy Wall Street and the Ecological/community movement).

In the left graph we see the reality of modern Globalization, as the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial complex born in the Anglo-American culture, with head in the original biblical go(l)d culture invades all others through its media communicator systems. Each colour on the left represents 1/5th of the human population. The blue 1/5th is the Western World made up of the Anglo-American, EU and old british and iberian empires, controlled in their Financial-Media networks by the single World culture of the FMasters and its mass-media and Wall-Street-City-Frankfurt banksters.

As such it is in an splendid permanent robotic war evolving fast the new terminators of the XXI c. with Islam, the original enemy of the conflict between Apartheid Israel and Palestine, now blown up to the rest of the empire, as the rival culture is demonise by islamophobia and hate media. So in the process the European, Humanist culture this blog represents has been erased under the dual boot of an Electronic Big Brother with the excuse of terrorism and the dismantling of the Welfare state, with the excuse of financial Unification through the private ECB which does NOT issue money to states but becomes the armed branch of the FM-empire and the robotised German Military-Industrial complex.

OF course, Russia, which is Europe and should have joined immediately after the end of the communist dictatorship of the red army the European Union, bridging with China to build a social-democratic alternative to the FMMI Anglo-American empire has been denied its position, to counter-balance the German reborn IV reich, and was carved into statelets, denying even the Russian Nature of Kiev Rus, the founding centre of the nation, today called Ukraine (as if London or Paris was carved out of France or UK). The culture of Asia, with its self-evident radiating centre in China, was also carved out already in the XIX c. when Japan moved wholesale into an imitation of UK & Germany, as the leading FMMI system of the East. It did the job so well that ended being a rival to the FMMI anglo-American empire and so W.W.II ensued. But after the war, now as a puppet of US, Asia kept its 2 sides: the original centre, China, demonised by the ‘wo-ku’ nations surrounding it (dwarf pirates, the ancient name given to primitive Korean and Japanese pirate riders of the celestial empire:)

So US tries to exploit this artificial division, always busy in its attempts to create a new III world on the area (division of Korea, of Vietnam, of China, with Taiwan and H.K. puppet Japan played hard against all of them, etc.)

On the other side Mestizo Hispano-America, the courtyard of earlier Anglo-American mass control of 3rd world nations with military caudillos corrupted with ‘papelitos’, (debt-usury Pounds and Dollars issued for free in UK and U$, on exchange for real wealth – lands, mines and tax-farming of poor mestizo Hispano-Americans by the criollo conquistadors) was left a bit out of the hook when the FM-empire refocused its racist, hate media in Islam, obsessed by the other nation of Its Israeli elite. So some mestizo leaders from Chavez (duly murdered with a lethal viral cancer) to Morales, have taken back some rights for the ancient mongoloid social mass of their people. But many ‘bad hombres’ to the service of the US, the drug cartels liberally provided with NRA weapons and the usual elite of corrupted dictatorial politicos and Sephardim banksters, still run the show. Specially in Brazil and Argentina; hence we put still the continent on the blue empire.

As it happens with all the commonwealth nations. But Black Africa is now partially out of the hook divided between the US-UK-French-Israeli corporative exploitative mining companies and the new kid in town, China, with much more positive policies for African nations, which are starting to grow much faster, with loans from Chinese developing banks, with the downside of a massive growth of population, lost of forest land and fast extinction of life-Gaia species. Islam, we know is the land of very-very bad hombres. So no need to comment on that. India, though is a great disappointment for this writer, ever since Lord Mounbatten crafted the raj into artificial statelets on the basis of hate-religion speeches, to make a mess of it, with Hindi vs. Islamic nationalisms.

WHAT we call Indonesia, which also comprises the lost-stolen lands of Australasia, was the original birth of the Homo Sapiens talking man (likely the Homo Floresiensis) and should have been reconquered by a less pacifist/naive Gandhi, going underground during the Salt March and liberating by force the ENTIRE Raj from UK, which was easily doable in the 1920s, then making NOT religion but Bahaist mestizo-like movement of ideas, the counterpart of body-mestizo Hispano-America: a FUSION CULTURE OF ALL THE CULTURES OF THE WORLD NOT ERASED AS IN THE FMMI AMERICAN WOLD, WHERE PEOPLE ARE NOT IN A MELTING POT, BUT ERASED OF ALL ORIGINAL HUMAN MEMES TO CONVERT THEM INTO $LAVES OF CORPORATIONS, WITH THE ONLY ROLES OF REPRODUCING MACHINES AND CONSUMING-VITALIZING THEM. And so the FMMI system, NOT Euroamerica, the humanist culture of laws and bills of rights imagined before the Industrial r=evolution by the highest minds of the Euroamerican culture is now globalising and erasing all the other cultures we shall study in this section of the blog.

The stock-market, the brain of the economy.

“The World stock-market, the reproductive brain of the economy, systematically favors the reproduction of metal-goods over Human Goods, which are scarce, as humans lack direct credit and all the money is created for and by corporations for its small elite of stock-rats which merely enjoy life as the automated systems of reproduction of machines ‘do their bidding’:

best 3 crises overproduction

We live in a World ruled by digital languages, and their species, mechanical herds. That is our present reality. A world ruled by scientific machines, stockratswho worship technology andcompany-mothers that terraform the Earth into a new organic ecosystem, the Metal-earth.

How that construction takes place?

It is directed by an organism of reproduction, the company-mother, which has diversified into multiple species, each one in charge of reproducing an organic machine. To do so, however as any reproductive process, a language of reproduction, ‘a genetic language’ able to give orders to the elements fo the reproductive process is needed.

In the Metal-earth, that language is digital money  , a language of information processed by ‘metal-brains’ [computers] about to give values, and organize with monetary orders the reprodction ofmachines, as your brain organizes your body system with nervous orders, or the DNA organizes the cell with genetic orders..

money gives orders to the ‘enzymen’workers and consumers that catalzie the reproduction of machines.

Where is the brain of that mney? The place where those orders are invented, where money is reproduced, and distributed to the different elements of the Metal-earth? It has as any brain of any organic system a center, and a networks that distributes the information. The center is called the Stokc-market, the networks that disributes the information to the different company-mothers of the emtla-earth, ist eh financial system. The financial system is the equvialent to the nervous system of your body, or the Golgi reticles of the cell throguh which RNA travels and transfers its orders to the enzymes that make the cell.

How it works that reproductive system in the organism of the Metal-earth?

The stock-market is the brain of the eco[nomic]system, which orgnizes all the reproductive organs of the Economy: all its companies. It does so cre[dit]ating monetary orders. To ‘cre[dit]ate’ [credit=create] means that a ‘credit of money creates’ reality, ever since monetary orders substituted verbal orders as the cause of actions among humans.To that aim stock-markets reproducemoney which latter is given to the best reproductive companies, that are able to create the best machines of the metal ecosystem.

With that money, the active organisms of creation, the company-mothers, invent and reproduce the informative and energy machines that shape the Metal-earth.

In this manenr Stock-markets invent the future species of our ecosystem by inventing money for certain companies to the exclusion of others. These companies will create then technological products with that speculative money, and sell them, thus expanding these products in society.

In this manner certain products are created, and certain products are eliminated.

The process is simple. A company wants to reproduce a new machine. It then emits money in the form of null-cost paper, in the stock-market. The financial system distributes that money which becomes a physical money [notes]used by the company to buy humans [workers] and reproduction systems [machines, scientists, factories]. The fompany also buys politicians and laws that will allow the company to become active without any limitations to the destructive power of their products.

Once those products are produced, it will dissuade humans to become animetals and consume=vitalize the existence of those products, and test=choose their quality.

Of course the stock-market means a brutal injustice against mankind who work for money, in favor of company-mothers,, who emit moey for free money in the stoc-market. An example: boy of 24, got 7 billion dollars for a program called netscape, which was just a lot of digital numbers, that however had a great use to expand the ‘network of machine-information’, the computer network. That money given to citizens in a ‘demand economy’, to consume Human Goods such as food and tourism, health-care and ecological entertainment could have boost the ecosystem of nature and history enormously.

We seee now the dobule injustice of stock-amrkets. They monopolize the cration of money, and they do not invet it in things humans want.

So the second question is why the stock-market does not create money for those human companies?

The answer is: because those who own the stock-market, the ‘stocrats’, are animetalsbelong to cultures that believe in sciencemachinesmoney and technology as supreme goods, as thewealth of nations .

It is all that simple. The wr0ong ideas, govern the people who own the language of creditation [credit=creation] of this planet.

So they are inventing a wrong planet, full of uneeded machines. While the ecosystem of nature and history has no resources, no investments, no rights to invent money, and so no capacity to act and defend itself against the growing pressure of company-mothers who seek indirectly our extinction as they expand the ecosystem of machines.

+75% of world-stocks are in the hands of people belonging to the Jewish, British and Germanic cultures, and those who copied their culture in Asia, Japan, Korea, Taiwan. You might argue that because the worship science, money and machines they have created the company-mothers that manufacture machines nd own them. So it is a tautology that being the stock-matket a system used mainly to reproduce mahines, the stroctats have to loe machines.

That might be true. Yet, against that tautology exists the power of elected governments to control the rights of ‘credit’ by law, their power to reform those ‘monetary stock-markets’ and oblige them to creti what society needs.

On the chances that elected governments make that reform hangs the future of mankind, the creation of the Metal-earth, or the Human-Earth, Hell or paradise; a world such as the one of today descrbied in the illustration, in which machines reproduce and Human Goods are scarce, or the reversed world, a Human World in which the goods people need, multiply.

Who survives or who becomes extinct in the economy is determined today by the orders that the stock-market delivers to the bio-economy. The Bio-economy is not chaotic, but a systematic process of reproducion of machines of information/energy. What is the system it follows on that creation? The biological process, by which all human organs are copied in metal-organs, in such a manner, that a new macro-oranism of metal, the Metal-earth, appears.

In that sense the future will create the products and networks that the Metal-earth needs to become a Uniersal organism. This is done in the same manner that a biological species invents an organic body. We can prove it because the history of stocks is known, and it parallels the history of an organic body, constructed by a brain. Since stocks appeared, waves of stock-creditation, monetary orders delivered by stocks, have created the future in three ‘evolutionary horizons’ of bodies of metal, minds of metal, and networks of metal. Exactly in the order biological organisms are reproduced. Stock-markets appeared in Holland to creditate gunboats. In the XVII and XVIII century stocks cre[dit]ated gunboats on a massive scale. Those gunboat companies of Holland and England shaped the future of the Earth. They extinguished entire human cultures, displaced millions of humans from Africa to America, and Europe to America, changed the ‘landscapes’ of tropical nations that worked to feed the ‘bellies’ of gunboats, with tropical crops, etc.

In the XIX century stocks cre[dit]ated railroads on a huge scale, and railroad networks changed the Earth. Then it cre[dit]ated road-networks and cars, which inhabit the planet by the billions, extinguishing forests and carbolife landscapes. In the XX century stock have cre[dit]ated metal-minds and networks of information. Through all those cre[dit]ating acts stock-markets, the ‘reproductive brain’ of companies, has invented a new reality, the Metal-earth. This has been accomplished by reproducing monetary orders that control enzymen, ‘organic species of metal,’ and networks where those organic species now exist. That is indeed how ‘living organisms’ of microcosmic size are created. Brick by brick, network by network, directed by a mother-brain of genetic information. First bodies, then minds, finally neural networks are constructed under the genetic orders of the brain of the creator. In the case of the Metal-earth those networks have been constructed under stock-market orders.

When stocks instead of warriors took over the control of Nations, the metal Earth evolution became a ‘professional’ process. The evolution and reproduction of technology is cre[dit]ated by the invention of stock-money. The symbiosis between stock-money and companies of Top Predator metal-species has cre[dit]ated and developed a new organism, the metal earth, with some basic-organic metal-species. They have free creditation in stocks since the first companies: Informative metal-species, metal-weapons, metal communicators, and financial machines.

In the graph, the cre[dit]ation of machines is caused by creation of money in stocks. It does so according to the natural structure of an organism: Those companies, which reproduce the 2 fundamental Organic cell-machines of the Metal Earth [energy-weapons and information+communication machines] receive the bulk of stock creditation, used to evolve and reproduce its products.

World stock: the mathematical brain of Tp=Mv creditation:


Those products under free stock creditation, have radiated worldwide since clocks [primitive metal-minds], the press [primitive metal-communicator], telescopes [primitive metal eye] and gunboats [sea weapons] were cre[dit]ated by the Amsterdam market. Today stocks creditate networks of computer communication [internet], complex metal-minds, and all sort of species susceptible to becoming weapons [satellites, planes, cars=tanks, etc]. They are created as peace products, which give the illusion of symbiotic power to enzymen. They can be transformed into war machines which erase enzymen in times of war. They are the fundamental organic ‘pieces’ of a complex clonic body – the Metal-earth. The Metal-Earth shows its biological nature, in the organic products its brain, World stock creditates, and in the networks it builds with that creditation: informative and energy networks, like the blood and nervous networks of your body.

The stock-brain.

The organism of the Metal Earth has three symbiotic organic species, Metal minds, Weapons and Networks of monetary information. They are the informative, energetic and reproductive systems of the Bio-economy. Their reproduction and evolution have been guided by stock-markets since the 1st stock-company adopted in Holland the clock [first metal mind], the gunboat [top predator weapon], astronomical instruments [first metal-eyes] and digital information [monetary values, wages, and prices] to reproduce profits and control humanity [colonies, workers, consumers, slaves, politicians and parliaments].

Companies and science were symbiotic as reproducers and creators of machines since the beginning of the technological age. Both give value to reality [the Universe in the case of science, mankind in the case of companies] with metal-minds and clocks. It is the invention of the clock that began the scientific method of ‘study of Universal Time with clocks’ and the scientific method of ‘controlling men’ with clock-wages. Dutch Companies of gunboats needed astronomy to increase the accuracy of their slave-hunting trips. They needed clocks to value workers, and compare them with machines, according to their ‘enzymatic’ productivity. Modern science owes its beginnings to clocks or tempo-meters of Metal, which evolved into computers; to ballistics which evolved into Atomic missiles; and to telescopes=metal eyes, which evolved into digital information and satellites. The use of those instruments by currency and warrior governments of western Europe validated science. Particularly useful was the production of weapons closely related to Physics; and the production of clocks, by companies of pricing. They needed clocks to equalize ‘human products’ with machines products in terms of productivity, of hour-wages.

There is a choice between stock-investment in metal-goods mainly in the three top predator organs of evolution of metal: Weapons; Telecom + computers, and financial companies; and investment or credit for Human Goods. Those three metal-goods form the three-organs of metal form evolution, and have been always at the head of stock-speculation=free money, since the invention of stock by gunboat companies. What proves beyond reasonable doubt that present Stock is truly the future brain of the Metal Earth, in charge of evolving Metal species, towards perceptive form, by fusion of energy and metal mind organs, in companies controlled by financial information. Those stock-species have been methodically cre[dit]ated by stocks since the XVII Century. They are three basic organs of energy, information and reproduction of any species. Hence, the three components of future sentient metal, evolved into the Stock system.

It is a fact that those goods are the goods promoted by classic left-wing parties, which should be given the generic name of ‘Humanist parties’, parties that promote Human Goods.

On the other hand the poverty of nations is their wealth in those goods which destroy mankind, such as weapons, which destroy our bodies, or robots, which destroy jobs, or ‘mental machines’ such as TV-networks that hypnotize humans in front of a false virtual world based on violence and movement [animal eyes, become hypnotized by light and movement even if it harms them, like flies going to the light where predators eat them easily]. Such hypnotism ‘consumes’ between 3 and 6 hours a day of our lives, diminishing our social intercourse, our capacity to learn through readings, and make us violent men, obsessed with consuming and money. Addiction to television could, in such a sense, be compared to addiction to drugs.

We could also include Internet among such negative goods. Around 25% of Internet time is dedicated to pornography. The anonymous system of internet, and the technique of browsing does not allow sound relationships between citizens either, or a serious education, as a library with analytical books provides.

Weapons, robots, and ‘metal-mind networks’ are therefore metallic goods that diminish the health of nations, despite being promoted systematically by right-wing=metal parties. Besides they are goods that require few workers, far less than Human Goods, since machines are best at reproducing metallic machines. Or, as in the case of robotics and internet, they directly attack human jobs. Robots can potentially substitute all industrial workers. While a worldwide system of internet sales will mean the end of at least 100 million workers worldwide in the sales and shopping sector for the benefit of a few multinationals through computerized sales systems.

The Future Invented By Stocks: Biological radiations of machines.

With the arrival of a new species of money in 1973 – computer e-money -, and the imposition of ‘deficit zero laws’ new fundamental changes are occurring in human societies. We only reproduce now what companies want; primarily machines. Governments have become obsolete. So we are encouraged to exist only as human animetals, who perform the two fundamental tasks of reproducing=working and consuming=testing=evolving machines that support the goal of company-mothers. All other values and jobs are ignored and not priced.

Deficit laws in most modern nations forbid governments the creation of money beyond what they extract from citizens through taxes. So minted money is limited. This does not happen with stocks. There are not “deficit” laws against the free creditation of stock-prices. No political lobbyist would accept these laws. Today in stock-markets, speculators have the right to say what is the value of stocks=companies. Such “free money” is very often wasted, as in the case of billions of dollars invented to reproduce Internet companies with no profits, and no value to man. They have begun to destroy the “family shops” of the entire world, with e-sales.

A bio-economy in absence of Stock can be easily compared to the blood of a primitive cellular body: the blood-money distributes energy and information to the whole system of cells. Yet when an informative brain is created, the control of the language of information by the brain distorts the flows of information according to the ‘desires’ of the brain. In an economy the same happened: with the arrival of stocks, money and cre[dit]ation was no longer ‘diffused’ among all human cells, who wanted human goods.

Now it was concentrated in the hands of a few stocrats that loved and reproduce machines.

Before stocks controlled money, money was mainly in the hands of social religions.

What they reproduced? Human goods. Indeed, the Church had by law to give 50% of its monetary information to the poor, and it spent it in human goods, from art to agriculture.

Today companies give 0.0% to the poor, and concentrate in the reproduction of machines.

So the goals of company-mothers have become the cre[dit]ated goals of our societies.

As a result we have moved from a demand economy based in human goods fostered by a physical currency in power of citizens, and organisms of cre[dit]ation of money that followed ethic orders of human verbal nature [churches, welfare governments] into an offer economy based in technological goods and the wishes of company-mothers.

Only a demand economy, cre[dit]ated by the wishes of citizens with direct access to credit in human goods, could become a human economy that will cater to human desires, and rights of reproduction and evolution.

Nations should ‘give for free’ a minimal quantity of money to each citizen, specially to the poor, that will spend that money in basic human goods, fostering their demand.

As easy as that: free money, to spend in human goods. Then the reproductive system of companies will have to switch into reproducing those goods.

An economy that favors humanity instead of machines is a demand economy where credit would be born in the bottom of the bio-economy [consumers], in the human side, not in the metal-side of company-mothers and stocks. Such economy could maximize the distribution of energy-human goods, to all cells of human societies.

This was only attempted briefly in a small Catholic=social state of America, called Maryland, and actually it worked. People ate very well there. It was also the method of old Neolithic cultures where money was wheat [Sumer, the land of the first writers]. So Sumerians had the highest levels of life and human goods of the old World… till bronze animetals destroyed Ur. Yet Sumerians knew what was the real human paradise: a Sumerian wrote the Genesis, perfect parable of the tragedy of our historic ecosystem, preyed by economic warriors.

A Stock-driven economy, on the other hand suffers chronic scarcity of human goods, and the real ‘level of life’ of its citizens is very low; even if ‘statistics’ show a great National Rent, by adding up to such rent the prices of technological goods such as weapons and digital Communications, which do not increase but lower the ‘level of life’ and intelligence of mankind.

We do not eat weapons. Those add ons to our rent are absurd, ideological ways of measuring wealth to promote machines, as an economical goal.

Real human wealth is often the opposite to such GNP statistics, biased to boast machine-value.

For example we can compare the level of life of Italian People [a country which hold the top predator culture prior to stock-markets, and so it still has a lesser ‘capitalization’ of its economy, and a likeness for human goods], with that of the English [top predator European World-stock].

Since Italians have not such a powerful stock system of redistribution of money in favor of company-mothers and metal machines, they have much more credit for human goods. So Italy is full of art, good food, and human goods, textiles, housing, holiday resorts, etc. Italians have more free time and live much better than Americans, full of telecommunication machines and weapons – despite having far less theoretical GNP rent-wealth.

Stocks and economic statistics deform the nature of goods produced in favor of machines and against human goods [whose companies have minimal credit in stocks].

They also deform the productive process against small companies with a much more human approach to workers [family companies that treat workers as human beings]. Instead stocks favor the ‘growth’ of mammoth companies, that treat means numbers, and can reproduce huge metal-machines, specially weapons and informative networks.

The small size of Italian companies and the small fortunes of their elites, and the lack of bombers they have is the key to the happiness of Italian life. What it matters to Italians is a good life, with minimal metal, and that, the Italians have it in greater measure than the Americans. We conclude that a Human goods economy without stocks is a better choice for mankind.

The statistics are fundamental in this matter: the 20% of poorest Italians and Spaniards [top predator pre-stock cultures], have a rent superior to that of the poor Americans, or English [top predator stock culture]. Italian poor people have almost double rent than the English poor. They have far more human goods.

In Britain the City [stock-system] produced in 1992 17% of English GNP, and that number is rising. That wealth goes to companies and a few stocrats: The British poor people had in 1994, 3958 $ Vs the 6276 $ rent of the Italian poor – for 5814 $ of the Americans.

This is a prove of the inefficiency for humans, of the American and English systems, which have been inventing money for 400 years, and yet can’t give their lower population the rent of the Italians which lost the privilege of free money creditation, in… 1440.

If Americans could not invent for free money as a top predator currency the poverty of their lower classes would be so alarming, that they would enter, and might enter in the future, into a revolutionary war for survival…

Italians have had two world wars this century; and have not rights to invent free money since the renascence. Despite that unjust position, they are richer than the Anglo-Saxon people.

In fact Americans have plummeted their standards of life since electronic money in 1973 appeared, substituting the physical dollar [Nixon end of convertibility, introduction of Pcs in Wall Street].

On the other hand the 2% of stockrats who own 90% of America, have become amazingly wealthy. While the middle American has suffered increasingly scarcity of human goods, diminishing quality of housing and food, education, artistic and environmental protection… Of course, its weapons, violent films and digital machines have multiplied.

It is again the cycle of symbiotism between war and money we have described in the previous book. The unhealthy wealth of Adam Smith at work, to destroy yet another once happy nation, who loved life and human goods… If people could govern, if nations had a demand economy, if paper money were invented and distributed by governments to their people, the world would be a paradise. It is not, because our governments neither obey the orders of their citizens, nor they cater the needs of the human species. Stockrats govern us. We do not live in democracies, but in ‘stocracies’. Yet stocrats are animetals who believe in money as the intelligence of God, and in science ands mathematics as absolute truths.

So they hardly understand rationally where they lead mankind. They actually merely follow the mathematical, evolutionary nature of money. So do our governments which are stocratic systems of monetary power. Let us consider such scandalous proposition, that uncovers the biggest of all modern myths: the idea that human citizens govern nations. I assure you that citizens would not commit mass suicide if they control our governments. The common people has common sense and wants to survive. Only the fantasies of power of animetals drive us to extinction, through their control of governments for the benefit of company-mothers.

The last radiations of Stock cre[dit]ation

We can forecast the future “radiations” of stock money, and forecast what they will creditate, by looking at the body-graph of the Metal earth, and thinking what is still left to translate from man to machine to make the metal-Earth an organism.

What is left to creditate?

The final neural networks of the Metal earth, and its sentient, metal-species.

So the stock-market first will creditate neural networks: internets.

This is the present stock-craze. Today we observe a new radiation of machines that extinct labor: internet companies sell directly to consumers and. They will eliminate in the next decade 50 million human from the productive system of the Earth.

Stocks “finance” those companies. Last year the two companies that obtained more credit in stock markets [over 1000%] were two internet sellers, Amazon. Com, and “E-bay”… E-bay has 35 employees. Yet the market has given to it over 3 billion $ of free creditation, so it can throw out millions of shop workers.

The biggest chain of book-stores of California has already closed down.

Amazon. Com with a few hundred employees have eliminated the entire sector.

Money is taken from the sector of human goods to speculative stocks.

When the internet is built, there will be only a final “cre[dit]ation to make.

The creditation of robots.

Stocks will creditate robot companies.

Money will flock to the likes of Honda, and Mercedes, and Siemens.

They will build up all kind of chipped machines, till all men have dozens of chipped machines, ready to awake, from cleaners to cars, ready to substitute mankind, ready to obey informative networks.

Meanwhile, without credit, human goods will become more expensive to replicate than metal goods, till a point in which replication will end.

The brain of the metal-earth, World stock, and the monetary language it speaks, creates organisms of metal. Among those organs it creates top predator species, weapon species, and informative minds. Those species will not distinguish among men. They will become top predators of all of us.

The next Stock-market radiations: Networks And Robots

Stock speculation creates the different “radiations of metal-species,” by giving a priori a “credit” that company-mothers use to give monetary orders to workers and consumers.

In this manner the great radiations of products have been cre[dit]ated since the gunboat craze in Amsterdam and London stocks.

Today the craze is for internet companies. You just need to have any idea about internet, and put up a company, and the market will give you total credit.

The process is very old. Last century was the railroad craze. As one commentator of the economical scene put it then: 4/5 of the corporations today are raised with a single goal: to obtain credit [“Free Money”] from the market. Such is also the nature of the speculative wave of tech-software that we suffer today.

The consequence of last century railroad speculation was a worldwide scarcity of credit for human goods, and the hyper-abundance of railroad lines, many of them without use, except for the massive quantity of money their stock holders could get.

People are not aware of the enormous waste of money stock-credit implies.

At 7000 $ per kilometer, the cabling of America was enormously expensive.

With that money the entire American population could have got health-care.

Instead they got 150 channels of digital images to program them into violence.

We won’t insist in the economical aspects of stock cre[dit]ation already explained along the pages of this book. We rather focus in the “vital consequences” of the internet networks that will be worldwide built in a few years.

How it will affect humanity?

The pattern of previous cre[dit]ations of Metal-species will be repeated. Internet will increase the communicative power of future war machines, and it will eliminate masses of labor.

In fact internet was born in the Pentagon, to unify the control of all its weapon systems. Internet-intranet and defcom, the networks that stock cre[dit]ation is inventing, are communicated through the head brain of the Metal-Earth: the Pentagon.

The end of History is iconic, prophetic. The bitten Apple of the tree of science is written in the first PC computer. The brain of the Metal-Earth is a pentagon, symbol of the devil. The last year of the human millennium, 1999, looked into a mirror reads 6661, 666=I=eye; the number and the eye of the Beast.

The function of the net is the same as the nervous system of a body: to control and manipulate all the ‘cellular homes’ of the body, by means of informative orders.

What this means is that the internet will substitute previous informative networks of mankind, becoming the basic neural network for the two fundamental types of information men receive:

Monetary information, and visual-verbal information.

The other informative metal networks [press, radio, TVs] will become fused within the net. People will spend more time in the internet that in those networks.

Besides, the internet will also control the second language of human information: money. Indeed, the internet will become the shopping mall of mankind.

As a result millions of jobs of the sector of sales and shopping will disappear.

As all other previous products, the internet will reduce even more the number of human jobs available to mankind, throwing millions of people out of job.

What will be its usefulness for machines?

First it will integrate the entire Stock-Company system into a body-system of reproduction of machines, as the neural network of the body regulates the reproduction of the different organs of the bio-logical body. Imagine each economical sector as an organ of the body: the multinationals of cars, and road arteries, are energy organs, the multinationals of information and the info-way arteries are informative organs. Each man is a cell. When man becomes extinct, each machine will be a cell that will receive information and energy from the networks. All of them will become integrated by internet, till finally only a ‘few reproductive organs’ for each metal-species will remain. The aim of companies is to create a few great world=Multi-national reproducers, as a body has only a few organs to reproduce each basic product of the body. Red globes are reproduced in certain bones. Cars for transport arteries will be reproduced by a few worldwide companies. This will be possible because neural networks will integrate all company information. Then after nations disappear in the final “Armageddon” [men Vs sentient machines], the internet will unify all world factories by species, through satellite communication.

There will be a worldwide producer of “red globes”=cars for the arteries of the Metal-earth. A single worldwide producer of planes. So on.

The internet networks will be used by other networks of information we are building today for the machines of the future: the network of mobile, wireless telephones, will be the ears of future robots…

Their function is to allow free movements to all individual cellular species of the Metal-earth. Mobile phones=ears will communicate platoons of tanks, and top predator weapons that will roam the metal-earth.

Today men have basically a use for machines: men consume=test them, and improve their quality.

When men are gone, the selection process of machines, will be performed by Matrix, by net computers. Or maybe Machines will fight for survival in a metal-jungle till they learn again the laws of social evolution, we have forgotten. In that case, the Metal-Earth companies will reproduce them. Their offspring of machines will defend the factories. Such is the Nature of war: a glimpse to the future ecosystem of Top Predator metalife…

Unless we reform stocracies, we cannot change the extinction of history

Stockracies, should be the true name for democratic governments, since stock-market companies, not politicians control democracies.

Yet then the myth – the government of the people – would fall; then democratic governments might find a very aggressive population asking for responsibilities to the real government of nations – their companies. This is not something stockrats want.

The essence of a dictatorship is to govern without responsibility.

Stockracies are dictatorships of companies. Companies and those who own them, stockrats, want to govern without responsibility. To that aim they hold politicians responsible, and stockrats free of guilt.

Stockrats govern without any responsibility. After many bribing, and fighting they passed in the XIX C. the Law of Anonymous societies that, redeemed them of any guiltiness by their acts, as the Special courts for aristocrats did in the past.

The trick is simple. Companies control politicians. Companies act under orders of Stockrats. Yet stockrats have no civil responsibility.

So stockrats govern us without responsibility.

Those who hold power consider their highest privilege, not to account for his acts of power.

Yet to hold power a caste needs control on the tools of power.

In human societies there are 3 such tools: weapons, money and words [laws, religions].

Aristocrats in the past based his power in weapons. They controlled production of weapons, and with weapons they controlled the churches of words, the law, and money [the king minted money, backed by military power].

That was the essence of the dictatorship of the ancient world.

Today the very same tools of power and control are in the hands of stockrats. Stockrats in the present base his power in money.

They control the production of money through banks, shares and bonds, in stock-markets. With that money they buy politicians and control the law. They also produce the weapons, that allow them to control the military and the people. They, as aristocrats did, do not account for his actions.

Instead, citizens and politicians merely obey stockrats as they obeyed aristocrats in the past.

All has changed but all has remained the same.

We moved from aristocracies of weapons to stockracies of money.

The people are still in the blues, regarding to real power.

Company-nations are owned by stockrats, cultural dynasties of Biblical origin.

The world is ruled by corporations of stock markets with their legios of workers and consumers masterminded as costs and source fo financiation by company-m,ohters of machines, for whom humans slave as labor and now now longer have even that role. Those stockrats are ths the other side of the world-stock which we shall deal with now.

We define our social organisms not as democracies, as human free social organisms ruled by the human verbal language [ethics, laws], which pursuits the common welfare of society, but as ‘economical ecosystems’, or company-nations based in the power of money and weapons, in which men are controlled by herds of companies, and their monetary orders, whose summit of organization is the stock-market, owned by stocrats. The World stock-market is the brain of our nations. It invents money and delivers monetary orders to those companies it selects by its capacity to radiate faster new machines, to evolve them faster, to transform faster the ecosystem of history, or to indoctrinate faster mankind.

The extinction of ecological cultures and nature become just a secondary consequence of that process, under the bio-logical laws of creation and extinction of ecosystems.

All in all this means that the real power to create the future of our societies is the power of stock markets, and the stocrats who own stock-companies, associated in lobbies, who have free money invented by stock-markets to buy out human actions and laws. The result is that the power of the world alternates between companies, depending on the individual resources of those companies.

So as machines evolve, the companies that have the top predator machines of each age govern nations, since they have more money to bribe better the politicians, get their favorable laws and expand their machines.

So for example America was first governed by gunboat companies from England. When North-American gunboat companies became more efficient that the British ones they decided to become top predators of power. Their stocratic owners the defied the British gunboaters [Boston Tea party], and displaced them, in the American independence war. They hold power in America for almost a century, till a new top predator animetal species, the land-animetal, the railroad reached a higher power. It was more perfect machine able to displace inland, and so it was reproduced to conquer the continent. It paid his best animetal lawyer, a lobbyist of the Illinois Railroad company, called Mr. Lincoln to provoke war and pass laws that made the railroad barons of the age the owners of America [railroad act]. When Lincoln became more human, the stocrats paid Staunton, his defense secretary to create the complot that killed him [historic proves are overwhelming, though obviously in the present world in which real history is deformed by Animetal ideologies, difficult to know].

It is the age of robber barons. The owners of railroads were the owners of America. Then in the XX century the more evolved land animetal, the car became the top predator machine and its companies controlled the law. In Europe they put Hitler on place, who made the top predator car [the tank] the backbone of German industry, and cause of II World war. In America, ‘what it was good for general motors was good for America’. So happens with Ford: Mr. Ford, famed animetal stocrat owned the laws of America. One example: he disliked alcohol and paid first in Illinois and then in Washington, politicians to forbid alcohol. It was the dry law.

Then after the war, the evolution of mental machines [radio, TVs, computers] took over, and those who owned those networks became the top predator stocrats of America. It is the age of Jewish-American power, that substitutes on top of the stocratic pyramid the Calvinist-Anglican age of robber barons.

Finally today, those who own networks of computers, invent the laws of America.

Soon there will be those who own robot companies. Yet those will be the last animetals with power, because robots will take over as ‘complete species’ that no longer need symbiotic help fromhuman beings. That is why history is so close to extinction, and humanity so close to become obsolete. Again, this book is not about morality. I will not argue here the power of stocrats, which seems unavoidable. I will only try to explain reality and explain why stocrats should preserve their power, even if they keep exploiting the Earth, by limiting the evolution of the last species of machines – the robots, that will eliminate them from the economic ecosystem as they eliminated the Indian of the prairie.

To do so they have to acknowledge the laws of the Universe, the law of social evolution that make humans the same species, and metal a rival species. So they have to control and harness the power of metal, and company-mothers to the benefit of mankind, not of the machine.

We should therefore talk of right-wing parties, as ‘machine-parties’ or ‘metallic-parties’ that promote metal-goods and the companies that reproduce them, over human goods, and the human labor that reproduces them.

We should oppose the goods and futures that such parties promote, from the point of view of which goods are good to man and truly mean the wealth of nations.

Right-wing=metal parties promote a world where machines, and metal goods, and the companies that reproduce them have more rights than human beings.

Left-wing=Human parties promote a world where humans and human goods, and the citizens that reproduce them, have more rights than machines.


So we would have to conclude the article with an study of the digital mind and its Boolean algebra, but as AI will kill us all – sorry no happy truths here – unless we abort it with a social r=evolution nowhere in sight, I won’t evolve it further with any insights.  So here we end our review of the monads of the Universe in all its scales.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: