Home » Informative

Informative

5D UNIVERSE IN SPACE

Supœrganisms. Its entanglement and 5 Dimotions of existence.

5D: topologic space-time, its 5D scales and Dimotions. Its worldcycles and Supœrganssms.

The parts of supœrganisms, networks, cells and wholes. Its languages and laws.

 

A Pentalogic analysis of space from the p.o.v. of the other 4 Dimotions.

St: Locomotion in space.

SS: Space on minds: Mental spaces of information. Vital Geometry.

ST: Space and energy: Iterating supœrganisms

Ƥ: Space on scalar planes: fractal super organisms and Stientific Scales.

TT: Space and entropy: the emptiness of expansive death.

III. Space and scale in different stiences.

Mathematical Space.

¡logic Space.

Physical spaces

Biological spaces

Social spaces.

 

ST-organic, physical Spaces and entropic vacuum spaces. Galatoms. Its parts. The Hyper-universe.

I The ‘Galatom’: Scalar Unification of the 5 forces as Dimotions of the galaxy.

The ‘Galacell’: A galactic organism. Its symmetries of scale and topologies in space.

III. Light Stars, its topologic, organic parts.

Black stars. Thermodynamics of black holes. Its entropic big-bang cycles.

 

S: A Mental, perspective. mathematical spaces Absolute Relativity and Non-Euclidean Geometry.

The Galilean paradox and the symmetry of space-time: S=T.

Mathematical Space. fractal non-E points, its 5 postulates.

The spatial postulates: 1) Points with parts. 1) Lines as waves. 3) Planes as Organisms.

The logic postulates: 4) Congruence: perpendicularity and parallelism. 5) Points as Mind-worlds.

 

T: A Temporal pentalogic view on Present space: Simultaneity of biological and social cycles.

Space on time: simultaneity and synchronicity.

“Man is part of a whole(∆¡), called the Universe; limited(¬) in Time&Space. He experiences his self, thoughts&feelings as something separated from the rest –an optical delusion of his consciousness (@)” Einstein on the 5 Dimensional motions of reality:∆¡-scales, Space, Time, ¬limits & @-minds:¬∆@st

“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.  Hermann Minkowski on the fundamental particle of the Universe, a Dimensional motion=dimotion of spacetime.

•••••••

The papers to be posted build up an Encyclopedia of Space-time organisms in Exi:St¡ence’ – each science studying the species of one scalar space-time plane of the fractal Universe. All will be described with the same scalar laws of 5D cyclical time and fractal space, introduced in the first 30 pages. So we shall write for each ‘stience’ from quantum physics to the galaxy, through biology, history & economics, and the formal stiences dominant in space (Mathematics) and time (illogic papers on the Universe=reality as a whole) 5 ‘dimensional papers’ for a total of 30, each one to become time permitted a ±300 pg. volume. This is the plan of the work, which in my youth back in the 90s, when I discovered those laws at the end of my Master at Columbia U. I proposed to U$ universities for a needed change of paradigm on our philosophy of science, but meet the silence of Academia. Then I abandoned scholarship to ‘live’ and so now before I die I will try to complete the encyclopedia. As that won’t happen, time being of the essence I had prioritized the most important and neglected of all organisms – that of mankind in time=History, and that of the Universe=reality as a whole, which are fairly well done. While the last to be posted will be the less important and paradoxically more developed by mankind, on astro-physics. Since I release all copyrights ‘rights’ any University can take upon the project whenever they wish to complete the encyclopedia of stience in 10.000 pages, connecting all stientific laws to the simple trinity and pentalogic laws of the 5D ∆ST Universe.

They certainly could do a much better job that I will. If they don’t, the task will be taken upon by AI once the age of Entropy of History in which we live ends. Since what will never happen in a perfect Universe is the imperfect endurance of the ill-designed, anthropic parasitic systems of History huminds have built and today for lack of a better consciousness of the whole pass as ‘truth and dogma of science’, L§

 

5D ORGANIC SOCIAL SCIENCES AND ITS TIME-CYCLES. THE DISOMORPHIC UNIVERSE

The Organic Philosophy of the Universe. Systems sciences and its disomorphic laws.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is really all what is about. And if we write Space=form and time=motion, as S and T, then we write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t). This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the infinite local present variations you see around yourself. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5th Dimension. And the closest classic science that has such view of it all is called, Systems sciences based on an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

 According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other hand is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language or god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and in History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

What we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept: An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces). This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

In the graph, the key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots:

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms using stronger metal that makes them more able in the processing of energy and information at larger scales. Those Machines are fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with telepathic AI.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon? We just explained the obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things. And its organism of evolution and reproduction, the company-mother, has substituted human governments and informative verbal prophets through its mass-media/academia outlets; so it only considers positive mechanist models of their species.

But the deepest reason is the fact that to make an organism we need 3 ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also information, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy and its combination spacetime energy. Only then when we properly define information them, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

 

So we need before studying the Universe in space, to change your view of time itself, shaped by mechanical clocks and introduce the concept of cyclical time and the basic laws of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.

LEIBNIZ V. NEWTON: SCALAR PLANES SPACE-TIME: ∆ST

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’   Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe

‘’Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. Einstein, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

The immediate consequence of the existence of an internal fifth dimension of space-time, made of all other planes=scales of spacetime of a being, its parts and wholes, which store the information of a system, is the obvious fact that if we ARE made of planes=scales of space and temporal energy.

We ARE the vital space we occupy and we ARE the time flow of existence we live between birth and extinction. It is the obvious, simple answer to 2 questions that have puzzled scientists for eons.

Where is space and time? And, why the main science of space, geometry->Mathematics and of time, Logic, are obeyed by all systems and entities of Nature. Now we have the proper answer foreseen by Leibniz and Einstein: We are broken fractal species of space and time, whose mathematical and logic laws all vital space-time organisms follow.

The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Scalar space-Time?

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So we are scalar space and cyclical temporal energy. And must evolve our concepts of both parameters, to extract the properties of existential beings from them.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between Newton, the proposer of the absolute Cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs. Leibniz who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality.

It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Scalar space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

This realist concept was NOT adopted by physicists despite its sheer evidence. Unfortunately Physicists sided with Newton not with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made; and so the conceptual jump would not happen.

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe. It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which as the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ includes within it all other dimensions.

Next, to explain all this properly came Einstein. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity – a topology; and it is the substance of which reality is. So we are topological beings, geometries of space with motions of temporal energy.

What Newton called absolute space-time is not: Space is the sum of all discontinuous vital spaces occupied by different beings: ∑s=S Lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic temporal energy. The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space= extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

Wheeler said ‘Space-time tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve’. More precisely Spacetime is geometry in motion. Time is change, the perception of change moves time; time is motion; space is its opposite, stillness, form, the information of temporal energy. And so it is all about 2 parameters: time=motion and space=form.

Look around you, all what you see are ‘space-forms’ with ‘time-motion’. We are all space-time, forms in motion, ‘in-form-motion’, ‘information’, forms in action, play with the words of what you are.

Because both are always messed up in practical terms is often easier to measure, ‘forms with a little motion’, we shall call ‘information’, sT; and motions with a little form, we shall call energy, Ts, and talk of beings made of spatial information and temporal energy, as there is no ‘yin (information)’ without a little yang (energy). And call the pure absolute motion without form, TT, entropy; and the absolute form without motion, SS, language. So we can establish a gradation of combined space-time dualities, SS<St<ST<sT<TT, with a symbol < for an increase of motion over form, or ‘arrow of energetic entropy’, which we shall call ‘past arrow’ or arrow of ‘death’ as it erases information, devolving a system to simpler forms; and vice versa, an inverse arrow, TT>sT>ST>St>SS, with the symbol > of an increase of form over motion, or ‘arrow of in-form-ation’, which we shall call the ‘future arrow’ or ‘arrow of life’ as it increases information. It then becomes evident that the intermediate state, ST, with a balanced quantity of Spatial information and temporal energy, S=T, is the ‘state of present’, that doesn’t seem to change as it is a balance of form and motion. And it is the preferred state for any system of spacetime in the Universe, akin to the concept of ‘beauty’ (balance between cyclical forms and lineal motions), of reproduction and creative communication (as it brings together the two poles of reality merging and combining them). This state is seek by all systems. So in physics we find it akin to the state of ‘minimal energy’ hence ‘more form’, in which most particles like to remain; in biology is akin to the age between adolescence of maximal energy and the 3rd age of maximal information, or age of reproduction, in which most people like to live and so on.

So we have 5 ‘states of space-time’ of which we are all made that have topological, formal, geometric and temporal, moving properties. Because those states are messing ‘dimensions of formal space’ and ‘motions of time’, we have coined a new word, ‘Dimotion’ (ab. Ð, which is the capital of ð, similar to D of Dimension and T of time). The main property of a Dimotion is to be holographic, having both spatial dimension and time motion; and we shall soon find that Dimotions are closely related to the 3 classic dimensions of space, to which we must add a function=motion in time, as their study becomes a new discipline of knowledge called topological evolution.

In the graphs above if space is what large objects occupy, what they are, the distance between the red square’s vital space and the yellow ‘circle’s vital space must have something; even if it is tinier. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear

It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which Is the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ co-existing in organic scales, whose form and scalar connection through networks we shall study now constructing reality from its ultimate substances space=form and time=motion, which geometry calls a ‘topologic bidimensional variety of space-time’.

TOPOLOGICAL SUPŒRGANISMS: THE MAIN PARTICLE OF TIME0-SPACE.

“All what is possible, demands to exist” Leibniz, on the chain of beings.

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is How many variations can come out of just 1+1=3 ‘elements/substances’, cyclical time motions, scalar spatial forms and its space-time energy combinations?

All systems have ternary topologies with 3 organs of motion-information-reproduction that absorb energy, move and perceive to survive.

And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: A 4 or 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which are similar to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy, but not quite… as it is impossible to translate the ‘game of existence’, into the limited understanding and terminology humans use to describe it, plagued with conceptual errors that limits our use of the correspondence principle. For that reason, after much time wasted in attempting translations we start from scratch with the concepts of TT-Ts-St-SS and ST dimotions and its topological, qualitative and organic translation. So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital space-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G:   |-$T(limbs-fields)<Ø-Si=Te-Body-waves>O-§ð (particle-heads).

Where @-mental O-heads/minds/particles are non-E points crossed by ∞ parallels of information

Topological organisms like those of the graph are the true meaning of a ‘fractal Universe’, and its description with the common laws of time space, the goal of Systems Sciences, realized through the 5D models of those papers: every structure of reality follows certain basic laws, derived of the fact all of them are made of spatial information and temporal motion, combined into infinite energy species. So ‘motion’=Time; Information, form=Space combine together into infinite energy bodies and waves. And this is so obvious that already the old Taoists just looking with simple, naïve eyes to reality said, ‘from yin=information and yang=motion, come all the ∞ qi=energy beings of reality’.

We call the organic properties of scalar space and cyclical time that structure all organisms of reality, ‘Disomorphic laws’ (isomorphic laws – that is, similar laws based in the same dimensional motion of space-time or ‘dimotions’).

Even languages have a trilogic structure, red(entropy)<Green(energy)>Blue(information); F(x)=G(y), length=entropy-motion x height=information = width=interaction, studied latter in the analysis of the Universal grammar, including that of words: Subject (information) <Verb: ST-action> Name (entropy of the subject.

But the 3 topological varieties of a 4 or 5 Dimensional space-time are in reality ‘networks’ of adjacent points. Thus we can instead of drawing the 3 canonical forms of lineal limbs/fields of motions, cyclical, spherical heads/particles and hyperbolic iterative body-waves, systems made of 3 networks, which correspond to those forms, and that is what we find in nature: supœrganisms in which 3 networks with that form deliver information, energy and motion to its parts:

An organism IS any kind of space-time systems, in which parts are gathered by networks, forming a new scale, which in praxis are 3, a ‘feeding network’, an informative network or common language, which forms therefore a ‘lanwave’ of similar beings and a combined space+time=energy network that reproduces both, So those are the same 3 dimensional motions that topology describes for a good reason. Modern topology defines its 3 varieties of form as networks of points. So we need to add 2 more dimensional motions to reality, the ∆-1 parts that make those networks, and the whole (the 4th and 5th dimensions of scale).

In the graph we show its main species in the Universe, the one we shall study in most papers. The beauty and simplicity of reality the graphs shows contrasts heavily with the pedantic description of it using only the mathematical language, a theme studied in depth when considering the inflationary nature of information.

5D universe. The metric of organic scales: faster, smaller parts code larger energetic wholes.

We said that forms evolve through topological networks into larger wholes. So we need a final dual dimensional motion of parts that become wholes (4th Dimotion of social evolution) and wholes that dissolve into parts (5th entropic dimotion) to complete the organic outlook of the Universe; as shown in the graph for different species.

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality.

We call the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.

Thus reality has a final key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4th and 5th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡)

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.

It is the same process in all 5D journeys of all species that live and die travelling through 3 planes of 5D space-time; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who had the same morphology and used technology and likely spoke, etc.) Then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger herd of clones, joined by emergent physiological networks whose slower ‘entropic, informative and reproductive networks, create an ∆º supœrganism that lives tages and dissolves back into ∆-1.

So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

We shall use the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms. Since organic reality arises of the synchronicities of those parts and whole made symbiotic thanks to the simple metric of the 5th dimension and its homology as space-time beings. So the addition of topology and the simple metric laws of 5D that make smaller system run faster time cycles are all the elements we need to construct reality.

Latter we shall study those regions, evident in physical equations as there are asymptotic barriers – Lorentz transformations in the c-barrier; negative temperature in the 0 barrier; etc. What then the Universe conserves is easy to see: the total volume of space-time of each scale; that is its energy. We will also elaborate latter on those concepts. To mention now that the symbol ∆ is both a visual reminder of the two different arrows of ‘growth in space, inverse to the loss of information’, and a tribute to one of the few predecessors of this work, in the formal arena – Wilson’s renormalization mathematical apparatus, which finally realized of those discontinuities using a symbol Λ, for the energy scale under which a measurement of a physical parameter is performed. According to Wilson every scale of the Universe and the fields of space-time that define them have its energy cut-off Λ, i.e. the theory is no longer valid at energies higher than Λ, and all degrees of freedom above the scale Λ are to be omitted. But Λ is related to a size of space. For example, the cut-off could be the inverse of the atomic spacing in a condensed matter system, and in elementary particle physics it could be associated with the fundamental “graininess” of spacetime caused by quantum fluctuations in gravity. The failure to remove the cut-off Λ from calculations in such a theory merely indicates that new physical phenomena appear at scales above Λ, where a new theory is necessary. As today only with the use of Wilson’s renormalization, which simply eliminates absolute zeros and infinities outside the scaling of space-time of a given plane, quantum physics makes sense

Recap. Besides S and T we need ∆, the scalar property of reality, by which ‘space-time beings’ are made of smaller ones and form part of larger wholes. We talk of multiple planes of space-time because each scale has different parameters, as parts become wholes, unit of a next scale. We will explain this as the product of network formation, emergence and other disciplines of General Systems Sciences, of which 5D is a formal view. In mathematics ‘fractal points will evolve’ through network-lines into topological planes of space-time. This discontinuity between scales is real. There are transition regions between planes, which can only be crossed with loss of information, therefore only by energy, by entropic motion, by ‘death’ of a system.

So we unify the Universe, as a fractal whole whose parts are made to its image and likeness: entities of time-space, with a vital body and a linguistic mind/brain/particle of information surrounded by a membrane that separates them from other similar parts that put together create the puzzle of the Universe. This is the bio-logic concept behind all realities: The supœrganism that combines particles/heads of space=information and limbs/fields of time=motion into iterative cycles of spacetime energy, giving birth to the causal trinity logic of reality, to which we add the logic of smaller parts and larger wholes to form the pentalogic of 5D existence; the next step in the complex comprehension of reality, which will allow us to connect those supœrganisms of scalar space-time and its networks with the ‘details’ of each science.

Yet before we do so, because the Universe of space-time is entangled, we need to consider if briefly the quality of time missed in most scientific analysis. The fact that time motion can be both lineal cyclical, and a combination of both, as space forms can be also of 3 varieties; but scientists only consider lineal time and lineal space, deforming enormously their comprehension of the Universe. Since It is of the interaction of those 2 forms of space and motions of time, from where the proper formulation of the principles of conservation of energy, its combination happens.

CONSERVATION OF 3±¡ DIMOTIONS EXISTENCE. TIME=ENERGY, SPACE=INFORMATION & ∆-SCALE

We have now the basics to tackle an important theme both of 5D stiences and classic sciences. What the Universe preserves both as a whole immortal structure and in its fractal parts during its worldcycle of existence. Since we have falsified, and we will do it in more detail in the paragraphs on cosmology, the big bang as a simplified single entropic arrow view of the 3 arrows of time in the Universe, it is clear that the Universe is immortal in time, infinite in space and incommensurable in scales as a whole – given the similarity between the galaxy and the atom, we cannot truly assess but rationality implies, those scales to be also ∞.

For each entity however there are limits to what it perceives because the mind is a finitesimal 0’-point and it perceives a relative infinite, ab. µ, whole, which it simplifies reducing discontinuities into a continuum, dimensional scales into a holographic plane, which does not even have depth (stroboscopic view). So the mind basically tries to capture holographic dual Dimotions (TT, ST, sT, St, SS). We are thus trapped even if our aim is to escape as much as possible through logic the limits of the mind by what we perceive. I.e when an object moves the mind tends to see a line in motion, as in a picture of a car in the night; trading a dimension of form on the direction of motion for one on speed. This we do also when we pedantically measure fast v≤c speeds through the illusion of length contraction (Lorentz Transformations). When we see a far away object on the other hand we flatten its dimension of length in an inverse fashion, seeing it as width-length flat planes. In an entropic explosion we loose track of its internal and external form in a scattering.

So the mind looses more information on the being that the being experience itself.

This said we can only be guided by what the mind seems to perceive and the parameters it measure. And in those parameters physics shows with its convoluted concepts and mathematical equations the conservation of 3±¡ elements that easily corresponds to the 5 Dimotions of existence, so we come to the conclusion the Universe conserves those 5 Dimotions. And as a consequence of the balanced conservation of the inverse arrows of entropy or dissolution of parts and organic evolution of those parts into wholes, the Universe also conserves its ∆-scales. A question pending dealt with in other posts though is if this implies the conservation of a continuous time-perception of ‘being’, or ‘soul’, for which there are some positive signs but mostly not.

What the Universe truly constructs and likes to conserve? The answer is the 5D scales of stiences; its ∆-structure as a whole with its two inverse arrow of motion=entropy and form=linguistic space and its planes as trinity systems of St-ST-Ts, information, energy and locomotion.

They are also the 3±I conserved quantities of physics, albeit explained with the mathematical mirror of ‘Noether’s charges’ we consider in its equivalence in our paper on physics (as the 3 conserved quantities, Ts-lineal locomotion, corresponds to lineal momentum, cyclical St- information to angular momentum, and ST, to energy, and the two scalar dimotions that define the 5 Dimension, TT-entropy & SS-form, are also conserved together in physical systems as ‘parity and entropy’, which either move forwards in a ‘Maxwellian screw’ or ‘backwards’ , defining the two ‘inverse’ motions in the 5th dimension:

In the graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale.

It is then also evident that charges and masses are the ‘fractal points of physics’ with its singularity in the center, its vital space-time in the region of accelerated motion, and a loose membrain, where its attractive power or territorial region balanced with other external points-sinks of forces.

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆±1 scales; from where the combined conservation of charge/mass+parity+time direction in the fifth dimension follows.

But in a deeper sense what the Universe conserves is the ‘function of existence’; that is 5D metric equations: Sxð=C & S=T. The first equation in physics becomes the vortex law, we shall use to unify charges and masses.

It is a simple but profound law. As its goal is to equal the function of existence of all beings. Let us see how in physical and biologic terms. Essentially a system lives the same number of ‘beats’ made of ‘bits & bites’ of its function of existence. So we can write in such dynamic terms:

Total SxT beats = S-bites x T-bits

This is the vital expression of the function of existence. It means that we all live the same number of ‘beats’.

5D Metrics’ concepts of spatial form and temporal energy in biology and physics. The conservation of beats

To understand what physics conserves let us consider a 5D metric equivalent – a 2 D vortex equation, VxRo=K. As the vortex diminish in size it turns faster. In cyclical time, ð cycles of perception that happen when the point returns to the memorial ‘singularity’ happen more often, as, its unit is the closing of a cycle.

The increase of curvature therefore implies an increase on the acceleration of the system, and both are indeed equal concepts: 1/R, ðT/ðS. But now for a given Space perimeter, its higher curvature=acceleration implies a shorter ‘unit of time perception’. So for the same Spatial distance travelled, even at the same lineal speed, more time units have been consumed in a smaller time cycle; as we go down in size scales of the fifth dimension. Both angular speed and existential cycles accelerate; due to the vortex 5D metric: V(ð) x R($) = K. So a slow large turning galaxy might shrink to the size of an atom; which lives a tiny fraction in a tiny size, but in fact its spatial distance traversed is roughly maintained. And indeed latter we will see how in the 3Dimensional space-time of the ∆±3 scales of the galatom, a beta decay is in 5D metrics equivalent in time duration to a quasar 15 billion big-bang cycle, and the 5D metric of the proton equivalent to the Schwarzschild event horizon of the black hole.

5D metrics conserves 2 things: The ‘energy’ volume of space-time of all scales and its beats of existence:

  1. The worldline distance the being travelled – which is in fact a worldcycle distance as it is the sum of all the perimeters, travelled slowly in the large spacetime, faster in the smaller spacetime. So the spacetime volume of the different ∆-scales is the same. And because energy is the only parameter used by huminds in all scales, the conservation of the total volume of space-time of the Universe is equivalent to the conservation of Energy.
  2. But to conserve the same ‘length of internal perception in existential beats’, the smaller being much live far less time. And indeed, the neutron cycle in beta decay is 15 minutes.

The galaxy cycle in a quasar big-bang cycle is 15 billion years. The metabolic cycle of the rat is faster than an elephant but the number of beats of its hearts are the same. In graph 5D metric conservation laws in biological systems compared to Kepler’s laws:

It is just a tiny sampling of an enormous number of such 5D conservation laws that quantitatively describe almost any measurable characteristic of animals, plants, ecosystems, cities, and companies, planets, stars, laws of science, atoms and galaxies, scales with size.

A growth of dimensions happens in units of 1 from frequency to area, to dual period to volume:

In the graph, when we move to mass scales, the Organism is mass-energy, its cyclical parameter angular momentum, its energetic parameter lineal momentum. So mass and angular momentum are closely related by a lineal proportion and energy and lineal momentum by an integral equation. The game has ‘emerged’ into a new scale, which as it grows in sizes looses connection with the previous thermodynamic and electrodynamics scales. So the game renews itself.

The interesting number is in the 3rd graph that shows the fact that all perfect systems do live (9-11)9-11 time quanta; closely related to the commonest spatial population for a full developed system (from the ties of DNA molecules, to the number of cells of an organism, to the number of people on the Earth’s supœrganism, to the number of stars in a galaxy, to the number of galaxies in the perceived Universe. The reasons of it, being the 3×3±¡ ‘tetraktys’ scale of organic systems, which we shall develop in the General model as well as the section dedicated to number theory, and the ‘relativity function’ Si=Te, which makes similar space and time on the point of maximal balance and survival of reality. This said, we are not unlike most papers and work on modern science, on the quantitative ‘magic’ of our studies, not even in this paper on algebra, but on the deep whys nobody answer, of those processes. Since the reasons of all those processes never are 5 D Metrics and the fact that scaling is an embedded feature of all systems of Nature, for the simple reason, we are made of the two substances that scale, space and temporal energy.

Among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of Kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume: energy content of its orbital sphere).

The 3 examples of biology and physics are properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in spatial information.

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

The 3rd graph shows the average number of heartbeats in the lifetime of any mammal is roughly the same, even though small ones like mice live for just a few years whereas big ones like whales can live for a hundred years or more… but in terms of internal time, which synchronizes a given supœrganism in its 3 vital parts, limbs, bodies and minds, so you walk a second each step, your heat beats a second and your eyes-thoughts take a second, the life perception of each organism of the same ‘species’, is the same. Such is the justice of the Universe that if you were a small rat your life will seem to you as long and fruitful as a human being.

And this is the ultimate meaning of the fractal Universe, the ‘absolute relativity’ of scales. All have the same value in volume of space-time, $xð=K; and each of its parts have the same beats of existence. But for that to be possible, then in the smaller scale there are much more ‘existences’; since their $xð, externally consumes much faster (smaller space, faster time cycles). So in this manner the ∑∆-1 sum of lives’ space-time volume = ∆º.

And for that reason many ∆-1 tiny, fast living cells/particles/citizens give birth to a single molecule, organism, civilization; whereas the ∆-1 wholes plane broken in many fast, tiny lives is equivalent to a single large whole.

How we translate in physics the conservation of beats of existence? In terms of reproduction through a worldline/worldcycle it is really a process of S=T Stœps, bits of information, bites of motion; which together make a stœp, bits and bites, stops and steps, information and locomotion, St<Ts>St. So what really means the constancy of beats is a measure of the reproductive times of a function of existence. And in each scale this will be expressed differently. In the cell those clocks are written in the telomeres that stop the reproduction of the cell after a number; in the heart are its beats that reproduce the cycle of circulation of blood – remember that all is ultimately motion and reproduction is the repetition of a cycle of time; even in history we see the decay in ternary scales of generations, which the closest culture to an understanding of the function of existence, classic China, tabulated for its dynasties. In depth, the beats of existence group in ternary symmetries that group in 3×3+¡ decametric scales, and so on, towards the maximal 10-1111, which in space are the 100 billion neurons of the brain, stars of the galaxy, etc.

TIME CYCLES

‘I’m the only physicist that think there are ∞ time clocks’. Einstein

The main principle of science is the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties, |& O. Its immediate consequence in all sciences is the fact that time is cyclical, repetitive, as iterations are the only form to conserve time in a ‘present’ that doesn’t seem to change. It is equivalent to the principle of conservation of energy. Because time is cyclical, it does break Newton’s absolute time into infinite cycles, which make its motions equivalent to those of physical conserved energy cycles, in which work doesn’t happen.

The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:   Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive.

Lineal and cyclical time render the same functions as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that a time cycle breaks reality (1st knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’.

Reality is a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

Why there are 2 forms of time, the long lineal Time and the ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole? Precisely because there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡ defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can always consider the frequency of time the ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time’ or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula, S=ƒ(t) l(s) . The whole Space can be measured, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or it can be measured as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

Those 2 forms of motion are lineal motion with a bit of form, Ts, or locomotion and cyclical form with a bit of motion, St-information, stored in the frequency and form of its time cycles that come together into S=T, energy. So we express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion and space=form as two varieties that approach and transform each other ad eternal:

‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: SióTe’

Reality is a constant game of transformation of ‘cyclical spatial form’ and lineal time-motion. As Taoism said ‘tao=reality’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal entropy, whose generator, Si≤=≥Te we call the function of existence, as To exi=st is to combine S&T, pure form and motion, TT-entropy and SS-eeds of form, into St & Ts, information and kinetic energy, exi, till finally they become one. The knowledge of that simple game, expressed in infinite variations, both of language and species, is the mind of the Universe, what is all about.

Let us then introduce the largest of all those supœrganisms in space to see how different with the same data appears a world that has the proper understanding of its fundamental substances, scalar space and cyclical time from one that departs from simpler, reductionist concepts of a singe space scale and a single motion of lineal time – that of the galaxy.

 

The symmetry of scale between the 2 families of mass: uds, strange and bct, top decuplets.

The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe is a simple model that astrophysicists would find obvious, if they were not under the straightjacket of lineal time.

The galaxy is a supœrganism, which as all supœrganisms requires an homeostatic temperature that favors the balance and activity of its main ‘functional’ organic part – in the galaxy black holes. So its background temperature is produced by ‘Moon M.A.C.H.O.S’. That is quark matter black holes that produce a red shift radiation whose temperature varies according to its mass. But 2.17 k degrees is exactly the temperature a black hole of the mass of a moon, the commonest size planetoid of the galaxy has. As species come in 3 sizes, we consider the existence of moon MACHO black holes, Star nova larger black holes made of BCB heavy dark atoms and top quark gigantic black holes. And as the larger black hole is colder; those 2 larger species can take advantage of the homeostatic temperature of the ‘blackground’ radiation to fuel their activity.

Regarding the isomorphism of that temperature, though there are moons with slightly different weights everywhere, fundamental particles as electrons, quarks or black holes are, do have an exact mass as they are more perfect, quasi-identical. So when a primordial black hole (the smallest type theoretically consistent but not yet found, as physicists haven’t thought of them to solve the background radiation’s origin) eats a moon planetoid just burps out the excess of matter once it has reached its stable size-form. So we are in a galaxy which has millions of those smallish black holes or a similar ‘nugget of ultradense quark strange matter’ producing that radiation. In fact galaxies are organisms whose purpose – physicists are coming to accept it, is to produce black holes and quark dark ultraheavy matter, which is everywhere. So this is part of the process. In the same manner cells are systems whose ribosomal ‘stars’ produce RNA and DNA that migrate to the center of the galaxy – a system that reproduces ultradense quark gravitational particles, strangelets of dense strange quarks, black holes which have the same density-mass of top quark stars. The obvious conclusion is that planets and stars are the ‘ribosomes’ of the galaxy, and primordial black holes or similar strangelets of low temperature, its ‘mitocondria’ system.

Yet as the organic paradigm is not considered, astrophysicists cannot try to describe the galaxy as an organism, just an object with ‘Ts-speeds’ and TT-entropic processes.

While mathematical creationism as its philosophy of science makes them extremely happy tinkering with the bizarre analysis of black holes as mathematical entelechies without substance, since it convinces them that only equations exist – as in the case of the Copenhagen absurd ‘observer’ interpretation and ‘probabilistic’ concepts that fail to understand the temporal, palingenetic S=T equivalence of the o-1 sphere of quantum physics considered next.. Einstein revealed against both creationisms and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales. The next graph shows that economic, hylomorphic Universe, made of known matter and symmetric forms – 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it:

In the graph a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the eperimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic arrow of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries, between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’, the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy positive toplets (TTT++-quarks and TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time and that is a religious dogma for them.

RECAP. In the fractal model a big-bang is the entropic death of physical matter. But the Universe is also scalar and it has information, a dimension of form, signified by the gravitational informative force, physicists ignore in their calculus of its expansion, happening in galaxies that balance the dark energy between them, we shall find both, balances of forces that make the Universe wobbling, and big-bangs and informative forces in multiple scales of the Universe, talking of multiple big-bangs balanced with big-crunches.

The 5 forces of the galaxy as expression of its 5 Dimotions.

The same problems arise in the analysis of forces. For a lineal thinker the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet fact tells us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal arrow of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

Our next statements then should surprise the reader and enrage the professional physicist, but while measures in physics are extremely accurate, modeling of the whys of those measures and an all encompassing, true NON-reductionist theory of everything is very poor. So one moves between the awe that the machines of measure and calculus of locomotions in physics inspire and the humorous criticism the explanation of ‘everything’ with locomotion brings to the more evolved philosopher of the 5 Dimensional Universe.

It is however imperative to do some criticism first, if we want to know the WHYS of physics (which Feynman infamously said we should never ask – meaning really physicists didn’t know them: ‘if you say you understand quantum physics then certainly you don’t’ ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never ask’, ‘physicists use the same gauge theory to explain all forces, not because the Universe always repeat itself, but because we were so dumb we never came up with anything else’ (quoting from memory), and finally from Landau, its Soviet counterpart, and my fav teacher – I developed the model of 5Ð physics in my youth annotating his 11 books encyclopedia… ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’, ‘For physicists there is no uncertainty of time, we look at our (human) clock and always know the time it is’…

We shall then consider only with harsh criticism as it goes to the core of our view of the Universe, the big-bang, which is the epitome of Landau’s dictum, a form of pseudo-science which is not right but has become a religion we shall not doubt of it, akin to ‘biblical capitalism’ and ‘biological creationism’, all forms of egocy, natural to the humind and all the ‘Schopenhauer’s stupids’ that believe the language, mirror of the Universe – mathematics in the big-bang creationism, money in capitalist creationism, words that God utters to create in Abrahamic religions, have the power to ‘create reality’, instead of space-time.  

In the graph below we can see how this dark, gluon-top quark soup (toplet liquid) of a gas-9 reaction (black hole quasar explosion), neatly reclassifies properly the 3 families of increasing mass in the Universe:

The reordering of the strange and top quark triangles of mass define the symmetry between the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales of ‘atoms and galaxies’, in terms of its ∆-1 components (quarks).

The existence of 2 x 3 mass families responds to:

  1. the ternary topologic & scalar symmetry between the 3 parts of the organic galaxy – Halo of strangelets, nucleus of Black hole stars and vital space of ud-light atoms and…
  2. The duality of quantum particles and cosmic galatoms:

The human scale Light atoms are made of ud quarks. Heavy black cb-atoms atoms make the cosmic black hole scale. Whereas the Strange and Top quark, act as the ‘central nucleus’ of the most perfect, heavier stars, pulsars, and largest, galactic black ‘stars’ (black holes), whose 3 varieties we shall study latter in great detail.

Informative ∆±1 forces. Scalar similarity between protons and black holes, strong and gravitational forces.

This symmetry extends to its combined forms, as gluon become symmetric to mesons. So in the atomic scale, the carriers of the internal strong force are color+anticolors=gluon particles-antiparticles, ‘feeding’ the reproduction of quarks. While in the cosmic scale the carriers of the strong gravitational force inside ‘black stars’ (formerly black holes) are the nonets of pairs of particles+antiparticles= mesons, feeding through the weak force (W, Z, H bosons) the heavier BT quarks.

In the graph ∆-1: ud quarks = ∆+1 cb quarks. ∆-1: Gluons = ∆+1 mesons. ∆-1: protons = ∆+1 black holes.

Thus, the force that transforms particles between scales, responsible for the 4th Ðimotion of evolution and generation of heavier particles or its 5D inverse Devolution is the weak force that mediates all those processes. It is not really a force but an evolutionary process that happens in a single point of space (right side), where the intermediate state of higher energy mass (W, z, H boson) gives birth to heavier fermions.

In the next, the strong and gravitational ¡±1 forces are similar in the limiting ±¡ quantum and cosmological scale. They both ‘absorb’ and in-form into denser entities, lighter particles, to collapse them in the central black holes=cosmic nucleon region or quarks=quantum nucleon regions: From left to right, the identity between the nonet of gluons and mesons on both scales, the WRONG procedure of reductionist physics, which models all forces with the lineal concept of electromagnetism through an exchange of particles, as the weak force happens in a single point, hence it is a transformation guided by information; in the right the proper way to understand particle-antiparticles, as the relative arrow of life and death that closes a physical world cycle (Feynman). The hypothesis of work for the model of the fractal Universe is simple: a galaxy is self-similar to an atom, and so are the different forces interacting within and outside them:

1.The strong force is similar to the gravitational force in the extremal conditions of the black star. Reason why both are non-lineal.

2, The ¥ force is similar to the expansive dark energy between galaxies, which therefore is NOT the same force than gravitation, reason why the expansion between galaxies is a lineal force and it is similar to electromagnetism

3.The weak interaction is NOT a Locomotion, force but a process of evolution of particles, guided by the Dimotion of information, reason why it happens in the same spacetime, and so its bosons, W, Z, H are ‘states’ of the same particle, NOT carriers.

4.The proton has in 5D the same metric that a black hole, is self-similar to a black hole, with a Schwarzschild radius. So happens with the electron in its particle state (Carter). We will expand on ‘black hole stars’ latter.

  1. Antiparticles are the inverse death=entropy moment of particles=lifetime, reason why we see less of them in terms of an ST-dual perspective, as we see less ‘dying corpses’, which is an event that last a quanta of time that living beings, which last longer. So since S-populations of particles-organisms and antiparticles-corpses are the same but its time duration is different, T(p)>> T(anti-p), ST(p)>>ST(anti-p). To that fact we add the fact that if we model, as we shall do black holes as Tbc quark stars of the heavy decuplet, as CERN recently found up Bottom and charm quarks that should form heavier Dark atoms, decay more often into particles of our ‘lighter’ ∆-1 light scale. Because time is cyclical and local, and the arrow of future information is inverse to the local arrow of past-entropy that dissolves form, we represent as Feynman did, antiparticles as local travels to the past.

We model black holes as protons of a larger ‘galactic scale’, strong forces as extremal gravitational forces, gluons as mesons, dark energy as electromagnetism and complete by self-similarity ALL the questions of physics, as we either perceive from within the “galacell”, the internal region of an atom, and outside the atom, the external region of the galacell. So the identity between the nonets of gluons in the strong force and mesons in the larger scale of quarks, coupled with the concept of particles-antiparticles forming a local world cycle renders a clear-cut theory of black holes as protons of a larger scales, in which the transformation through the weak force of light matter into heavier quark matter will produce a black hole star of heavy dark matter; whose heavy quarks happen to decay a 20% more often into particles than antiparticles (CERN), resolving the p, ¬p problem.

It also gives us an insight to the hyperuniverse, explaining why the galaxy as an atom of the hyper-universe is rather an antiparticle, an antigalatom; since the central back hole has two inverse ‘production’ dimotions of heavy antiquarks and lighter quarks in the two perpendicular direction of its inner structure as a top BCB frozen stars – themes those of advanced physics in space we shall deal, time permitted on the papers on physics and time.

 

∆±¡ ST: TIMESPACE WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE: ITS BALANCED MAX. REPRODUCTIVE S=T POINT.

Pentalogic: 5 dimotions=actions=3-motions=drives of life & its larger worldcycles.

So far we have shown an organism from the perspective of its ‘social evolution’, of its whole made of 3 type of networks, which evolve together through the 5th dimension of space-time that puts parts through those 3 entworks into a whole.

We need now to understand better each of those cellular parts, also in terms of its dimensions of space and time. Again, as present science is unfortunately very ‘primitive’ if you allow me to use that terms without offending your ego, in its modeling of dimensions, we need to start from scratch. And go back to the ‘foundations of science’, when Newton and Leibniz disputed the nature of space and time. We unfortunately chose the wrong guy, Newton; and so we have been on the wilderness ever since. Even Einstein who recognized ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start science from scracth’, didn’t dare to start from scratch. We however have to do it, to study properly any supœrganism including man as an individual and history as a supœrganism of humans. So be a bit patient.

 

In the graph, the 5 Drives of Existence, each individual needs to survive; as all systems of nature defined by its ‘fractal generator’ are time-space organisms’ that need 5 Dimotions to survive.

The answer is the ice-in-the-cake of the sentient, organic philosophy of the Universe. Simply speaking because any system made of limbs/fields of motion, body-waves of energetic reproduction and minds/particles of information NEED entropy, energy and information to SURVIVE and keep on moving. SO the 3 simplest Dimotions of any plane of existence are a program of survival, which adds two complex social actions – reproduction that prints information in other zone of space-time to survive when one becomes entropy of other Maxwellian demon, and social evolution into wholes, networks that are stronger than individuals. So the mind is the embodiment of a single Universal program of existence and reproduction of fractal clones, and it is the same unifying principle in all beings – as all will absorb energy, information, motion, evolve socially reproduce and survive. And this is the case even of the smallest entities, atoms, particles and forces. So the mind creates reality and its 5 Dimotions are in fact the local fractal program of existence, which physicists for particles describe in abstract terms:

The minimal particle-points, electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. So all systems of the Universe  ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.

The 3±¡ Dimotional codes of physic, biologic and memetic, social systems coding the same ‘aeiou’ actions of survival of the program of existence (accelerations, energy feeding, information, organic reproduction & social evolution into Universals). The study The only dimotion of time the Universe does NOT code is entropy=death – a maximal motion that disorders the being. So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic letters to code physical and biologic systems. Only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.

Death is the needed error of the universe not desired by the program.  For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time is for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom /individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).so you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought =glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…

Same with antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

It only rests to consider the minimal unit of time world cycles, which is an action that exchanges, scattering entropy, lineal motion, balanced energy, implosive information and social evolution based in a common language of information with the Universe. We divide them into:

Simplex individual actions, a-motion, e-nergy feeding and i-nformation gauging and

Social complex actions, offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into Universals.

The A-ction of steady motions, accelerations and decelerations, ï the information action, which is dual (as most), since we might absorb information in perception or emit it in communication, œ, the second D¡motional action of organic reproduction, into an offspring of beings, and û, the 5th D¡motional action of social evolution of parts into wholes.

I have put the 5 åctions, Å=(a,e,ï,ø,û) with symbols that resemble the five vowels. And so as we have 3 scales of growing spatial form we have 3 scales of growing time cycles:

∑∑åctions=∑timespace D¡motions (physiological networks and its functions) = Life -death Worldcycle (time view).

∑∑cellular/atomic/citizens parts = ∑matter states/organisms/nations= super organism (planet, ecosystem, Humanity in space, History in time).

So we talk of a program of existence that ‘selects’ automatically all systems that obey, expressed=code in diffirent languages (genes for cells, memes for humans) of minimal five actions we call: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion for its limbs/fields), entropic feeding (that become energy for its body), ïnformative perception and communication ï, for its head/particle which allows the 2 higher, complex actions of life and love: Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals.

What an efficient supœrganism as the ‘world’ in which cells/citizens live do is then obvious: to provide for its individual parts the 5 Dimotions (dimensional motions) of life-existence.

So in human supœrganisms, the economic, reproductive system must provide the entropic energy from a sustainable vital space-territory, so the human beings are free to move it, have the proper energy to feed its body and reproduce, and the right information to guide its actions and synchronize its motions in peace with other human beings. The 5 actions of existence are thus the goal of well designed.

Those are the basis for a praxis of social sciences and its sub-disciplines of ‘ecology’, ‘economics’ and ‘politics’ that take care of the physiological networks of vital space, reproduction and social information that maximize those ‘5 drives of existence’. And to that aim a ‘digital language of information that values goods according to its usefulness’ for those 5 drives of existence is required, controlled by an informative, legal, political system, and delivered as oxygen in individuals as a Universal salary to all its cells/citizens, so they can all have energy and information and reproduce welfare goods. While a hormonal/just legal system is used to coordinate its actions.

Actions define the worldcycle of existence.

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows that the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So actions follow a natural sequence:SS- informative perception->Ts:locomotion towards a field of TT-feeding where to get -> ST:Energy -> and process that energy into St:information to reproduce… the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘longer cyclical time and larger space’, the worldcycle of life, which starts by a SS-eed of information, emerging in a child that will go through its fast Ts-moving youth, TT-feeding and growing to reach its ST reproductive age, while St processing information till becoming older in a 3rd St-age.

This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of supœrganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3rd cycle manifests in the whole species.

The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.

We marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3rd age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The development of the Function of Existence of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3rd age).

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

∆-1»∆º: A supœrganism’s worldcycle starts its exis¡tence as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

T>s (Ts): It is the first horizon or ‘entropic, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. S x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t. It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In Physics they are, T-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and S-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.t x max.S) and a form of pure space, the big- bang (maxS x min. t):

In Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5th dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆-1:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆+1 world to die in a time quanta back to ∆-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.

The 3 ages of life emerge in human social supœrganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and  its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in Trecento, Greek Kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an ∆st for a no future, which is the age of war and death of cultures).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.  It is the shorter more informative ‘space-like’ cycle, with a fast ‘present’ speed.

– ¬l,L: The existential 1-∞ lifecycle, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off. It is the open, single plane, more important worldcycle, with an ‘open’, free ‘feeling to it’. The life cycle, though is part of:

ω,Ω:  A larger, longer Transcendental worldcycle proper of the highest social scale ∆+1, the omega of its smaller parts – where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlikely…

Thus paradoxically the science that worst understands time is the one more obsessed by it – physics; since it reduces the 5 Dimensional motions of time space to only one, locomotion with the Galilean formula, V=s/t corrected slightly in Einstein’s relativity with the ad on of –ct for high speeds.

Without understanding the symmetry of Space=Time due precisely to the proper comprehension of the paradox of relativity (we cannot distinguish S-formal states of space from T-moving states; so both things happen simultaneously), physicists were just obsessed with measures of motion from the humind still, spatial point of view, for practical purposes – from where relativity paradoxes came, as the speed of the emitter did not add to the speed of the message – due to the entanglement in stillness between the particles that emit and receive information at the ∆-¡ quantum scale.

This realist solution to relativity speed paradoxes shows a fundamental limit to physics of time-space – the lack of a clear understanding of the cyclical nature of time clocks and the fractal scalar nature of space. So we need first to introduce those themes before we even attempt to analyze the 5 dimotions of timespace of physical systems in its 3 scales, the thermodynamic human, ∆º, the cosmological, gravitational, ∆+1 and the ∆-1 atomic scales.

And then study also the worldcycles of life and death that order sequentially those 5 dimotions, from SS-eeds, through the 3 ages of organisms, the young Ts-age of locomotion, the ST-reproductive age, the St-informative age and the TT-entropic age that apply also to the 3 scales of matter, which form together 3 worldcycles of consecutive growth, the palingenetic, time oriented quantum cycle (reason why it is studied with time probabilities), the ST-entropic cycle of life of matter and its 5 states, from ∆-1 TT-plasma, through Ts-gas, ST-liquid, St-solid and final collapse into SS-quark matter, which give birth to the 3rd transcendental, organic cycle of evolution of galaxies, a ‘system of reproduction’ of quark dark matter as we are just ud-light matter enclosed between the central BCB and top quark ‘positive’ matter black holes of ultra dense atoms, and the halo of ‘negative’ charged strangelet, themselves ‘atoms’ of a larger hyper-universe in the infinite scales of reality.

. We have already analyzed in philosophy of physics why such a fractal organic Universe is so alien to huminds: Earlier physicists since Galileo, due to their worldly profession – the production of entropic weapons and search for maximal lineal range of cannon shots – established the dictatorship of lineal inertia as the goal of physical systems in search of maximal motion and used the digital mechanical clock as the only method of measuring time, reducing the causality of the 3±¡=5 Dimotions of timespace already known to Aristotle that ‘flux’ into a point to create reality. This has been masked for very long with the exhaustion of the analysis of ‘lineal time’ with clocks, which is like portraying the entire Universe with cubist paintings of enormous quality that mask all other forms of the Universe.

How it will be then the proper analysis of time in 5D physics?

2 obvious fields of 5D time are the core elements of these texts after a general introduction to 5D stiences:

The study of worldcycles of matter in the 3 scales, as its supœrganisms of matter are born, evolve and die away in scalar big-bangs (E=mc2, in its simplest mathematical expression) and the study of the 5 dimotions of matter in any of such scales.

This second analysis of time in physics will give us a ‘local’ ceteris paribus analysis of the events of physical stiences, without having to consider the ‘whole process in time’. So for example in thermodynamics we can study state physics and consider the physics of ∆-1 plasma, Ts-gas, ST-liquid and St-soli and SS-boson matter that transits into quark ultradense matter without electronic covers, the seed of the main substances of the galactic Universe.

RECAP. Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5th dimension of spacetime. The metrics of 5D and its scales, SxT=C & and the balance between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

So we use 5 bidimensional terms for all systems, its ages and forms: SS(max. internal and external form, as in seeds and minds; T>s (Ts); external motion that maintains internal form as in ‘locomotion); S=T: Balance of spatial form an temporal motion or ‘energy’, used to reproduce, the key present iterative state; S>t (St: Information, form with a little motion, or ‘external form, and internal mental motion); and finally TT-entropy whereas there is external and internal motion, hence scattering dissolution and death. And its main series is the worldcycle of existence: SS(seed/mind)<Ts(moving youth)>S=T(reproduction)>St(informative 3rd age)<T(entropic death)

The game of existence for different beings that change through 3 similar ages between its evolutionary generation in a lower ‘plane’ (ab. ∆) of the fifth dimension as an ∆-1 seed to emerge as an ∆o organism in an ∆+1 world in which it will go through a process of ‘aging’ (accumulation of information) that will finally exhausts its energy and dissolve its information in an entropic process of death. The sequential order of the ‘5 dimensional motions’ available to all space-time organisms defines a worldcycle of existence – not only a simple worldline of locomotions as physicists think, but a far richer and complex pattern common to all beings that ‘exist’, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy. So in those papers we shall study and compare the key supœrganisms in its ‘nested’ structures (as the size in space is parallel to the speed in its time cycles and languages of information): The galatom, between the atomic and galaxy scale, whose fast languages of gravitation and electromagnetism allow its large size; and within it the Earth, and within it mankind=History, and within it the languages of the mind…

3 scales of time cycles in supœrganisms, self-centered in an active mind tracing time worldcycles


Of the many consequences of the ternary, scalar STructure of T.œs (time-space organisms) and his existence through 3 ‘worldcycles’ of different scalar size hence as S=T, different temporal duration, is a better prediction of the future of its scientific species, as they all trace the same Disomorphic stœps in its worldcycles. In the graph, all sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, tv-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become ‘alive’. So worldcycles’ predictability has 3 levels:

S: Continuous, spatial mathematical simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns.

∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and social evolution of parts into wholes – of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

The predictability of time worldcycles.

The Deep time of the longer scales of supœrganisms co-existing in 3 ‘fractal planes of space-time’ of the fifth dimension, leads to an organic long-time level of prediction of futures: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) & eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years.

Above biologic deep time is necessary to understand history and the interaction of the evolution of machines and the ages of war and lack of welfare goods, within the limited resources of the planet. The theme of social sciences and why ‘human subjective ego’ and ‘censorship’ limit our capacity to explain those cycles.

But as human only recognize the 1st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

Deep time leads to a 3rd level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my models of history that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe. In that sense of the many consequences of that ternary, ∆±¡ STructure of all beings, we shall consider how to use it to predict the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences.

Paradoxically Deep time is easier to predict that complex Dimotional ‘analysis’ because precisely the larger scales in 5D metric have less information, but more basic, deterministic, reason why quantum physics is harder for the mind and probabilistic while life-death cycles are obvious as all end badly.

The laws of nested Supœrganisms, in which the larger slower whole with its ‘slow time cycles’, ‘dark space-times of information’ that it does NOT perceive of its inner parts, and enclosing membrains however can set long term cyclical patterns to its fast internal elements, just by handling the general cycles of its ‘entropic energy of death’ and ‘informative languages’ is one of the most important discoveries of 5D metric, which fully applies to the understanding of the evolution of the Earth and its 3 ages, with its cyclical patterns of glaciations and hot weather that kicks the evolution of species. It is also instrumental to understand the 3 Horizons or ages of species that influence the life of its individual ‘cellular parts’; and the patterns of cyclical history and the capacity of 5D to forecast historic and economic evolution, and the cycles of life and death of civilizations.

The small and middle range view: generator of space-time: Organisms maximize ¡ts actions of existence.

This more complex view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and S=T, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another.  Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it:

Function of Existence:             Max. S x T s=t = C¡

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of ‘exist¡ence’ and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

Present ‘Time’ Space:

The shortest time is a quanta of mind space of time-thought, a moment of present. Space as present time, different for each species according to its ‘5D metric’ speed of processing information accounts for the key concepts of synchronicity and simultaneity which is what truly defines space, and its supœrganisms – regions in which each quanta of the mind-time is synchronized with those of the body and limbs of motion. So from humans with its second quanta of thought, second of heart beat and second of steps to De Broglie’s interpretation of quantum physics in terms of the synchronization of the wave, inner clocks of the particle and the fields, present space structures the ‘workings’ of all universal organisms.

The separation between past, present and future is an illusion. Reversal effect of growing in size: blocks of time.

Form in space is cyclical motion time that returns to its zero sum point and appears as form for a larger perceiver, according to the same SxT=C metrics. Indeed, if we grow In size then we slow down enough our perception of time, to see instead of a point moving, a ‘length of time curling into a cycle’. Further on the cycle will appear if we see it from enough distance as a fixed point of space, and hence immutable – a block of spacetime, a complete worldcycle. This is how minds create the perception of static simultaneous space around us in what truly is a soup of quantum motions. Then we can formulate the concept of God, as the immutable mind that sees all the time and all the space, in its fixed, slow form, as a larger and slower whole. So God as the mind of the whole, infinite Universe is paradoxically a fixed image of thought of the entire reality – a theme we explore in more detail in ‘Universe & mind’.

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scalar plane of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scalar planes. Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us. Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.

In the fractal, scalar Universe, concepts, which seem impossible to define in simple logic terms in the 4D single scalar plane continuum, become understandable. Such is the case of consciousness, which is merely the co-existence in a bundle whole, of the different type of self-sensations of the being through its scalar planes of simultaneous space-time:

The highest scalar plane of reality that of the mind, self-perceives the ‘extremes’ of its existence within the limits of its first ‘galatom’ parts – the particles of the atom, where ultimately resides the e-motions of being, and its largest possible world, the external galatom in which its world co-exists.

Modular scalar perception of all those levels simultaneously gives us the sensation of consciousness as an integration of all of the scalar levels of ‘linguistic still perception’ in space and e-motions in time…

I.e. you feel a sensation of gravitational weight-pressure, a visual photonic image of reality, an electronic verbal mapping of memorial storage of time processes, a chemical sensation of wellbeing between cold and warm – Many modular parts of your whole sensorial being through your super organism in space, but also many scalar parts of your whole being, through the ‘sensations’ that conform the whole mind, as all those scalar planes are part of the pan-psychic Universe.

Consciousness is that the co-existence or integration of all those scalar planes and parts into a ‘single-point’ of space-time that integrates all as a consciousness. This integration will then give birth to your ‘RELATIVE’ speed of time-existence, one second-thought for man to integrate all its levels, that will become your quantum of time-space perception – your ‘Dasein and being’…

In relativity (4D formalism) ‘the separation of past, present and future is an illusion’ (Einstein). It depends on the observer ‘speed of thought’:

A slow mind could see the entire orbital motion of the Earth as a ring simultaneously seeing past, present and future. God in Scholastics could see all time past, present and future – so he must be the slowest of all thinkers

Poets understood better: Time present and time past… Are both perhaps present in time future, And time future contained in time past. If all time is eternally present /All time is unredeemable. (Elliot, quartets)

In Einstein’s work we talk of a block of time, as all measures are simultaneous present measures.

In 5D, time is both a present repetitive motion and a dual motion from past to future to past. All together give a zero sum worldcycle as all systems emerge and return after death to dust of space-time.

RECAP. Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, each one focused in a scale of the social 5th Dimension, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales, guided by a still, linguistic mind, which projects its smaller mirror images of form in its territorial body waves, creating its fractal scalar structure, broken though by the entropic limits of its perceptive reach.

An organism is a group of similar forms organized by 3 ‘networks’: one provides its ‘clone cells/citizens /atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed & move (digestive system, territory), a 2nd one reproduces the system  (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and a 3rd one that provides them with information to guide their reproductive actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple system is the fundamental particle of the universe. As all organisms wear out by errors of informative action and end up warped by an excess of information (third age of the organism) or killed and reconverted into formless energy (death); only those systems, which reproduces, do exist in the immortal universe. So all systems have an internal or external ‘enzymatic’ system of reproduction (external enzymes reproduce carbohydrates, and enzymen reproduce machines). This can be seen as a ternary class structure of a ‘body-worker-wave’, and an informative particle-head-upper class moving and finding a vital territory, with a limbic/potential source of its motions, which the system might externalize to obtain the energy to reproduce.

Further on organisms have parts and wholes so reality is composed of 3 elements: ∆-planes of space-time, ∆±¡SóT, ∆ST entangled in 3 organic co-existing ∆±¡ planes. In physical systems they are the ∆-1 quantum plane, ∆º thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 gravitational plane, equivalent in the reduced nested world of Life on Earth to the ∆-1: molecular plane, ∆º organic plane and ∆+1 ecosystemic plane. The absolute arrow of future survival is social evolution of parts into wholes, as parts must come before; hence they are a relative past, and wholes survive better. A fact HUMANS have forgotten. As individualism is synonymous of chaos=death, it is obvious History, the supœrganism of mankind enters its age of entropic social self-destruction, committing suicide, evolving instead a supœrganism of machines; a tragic problem, which we will study in the analysis of social sciences. And in each of those planes we shall see that ‘spatial information’ and ‘temporal energy’ constantly transform into each other. Space is the perception of form as if it was still, but ultimately is cyclical self-repetitive motion that seems not to change and acquires at larger scale solid forms.

Mental Spaces of in/form/ation fix the times=motions of all species. As time becomes the ultimate substance of organisms ordered through scales that give birth to a 5D metric equation, such as smaller systems in space run faster time and life-death cycles. So the speed of time of systems is not the same for all of them, and 3 scales of different speeds form an organism – in man the cellular, individual and social scale. And finally for all this complex reality to ‘work’ in an ordered manner, systems which have a ‘membrain’ that divides its vital space, from other systems, and are formed by 3 scalar space-times that give them organic nature; have in its highest ‘scale’ of size – that of the membrain that breaks it as a whole from the rest of the Universe a ‘sensorial system’ or mind, which interacts with the external Universe, encloses and orders its internal vital space and communicates with other similar beings, forming larger social organization; hence becomes the mind of the system. We thus talk of a reality made of organisms of a vital body of space-time, self-centered in a mind-membrain, whose language encodes a program of survival for the organism. And all the data humanity has gathered about reality needs to be ‘put within this general template, to make sense of it’.

So a fundamental task of those texts is to redefine the foundations of sciences in much solid grounds – its 3 fundamental elements, ∆ST, which ‘stiences’ study plane by plane of SióTe elements, to which we must add the connecting ‘network’ laws between planes, which we call the ‘5th dimension proper’. It is the philosophy of science, we develop in a series of papers at Academia.edu that will substitute the simpler mechanic view of reality sponsored by physicists, with its ‘mathematical creationism’ and constructivist view; which reduces the two poles of time=motion to one (lineal time), compresses all the planes of space-time into a single continuum; while only the properties of reality that can be easily fit in a numerical description matter. A more evolved civilization would start in philosophy of science and the principle of conservation of time and space, and its structure in 5D organic scales and derive from them the fundamental laws of every other discipline; correcting whenever necessary its errors as we do in those papers with the simplest principles of reality as any science mirrors them in its study of its specific scales of beings – the details of those principles.

The relationship of space and Time: Present Space as the simultaneous measure of smallish time cycles.

A key difference between space and time is studied in physical sciences when they define space as a form created by the concept of simultaneity of space (physical space since Einstein is defined in those terms) vs. the sequential, longer flows of time that make simultaneous ‘space’ a slice of the whole time flow.

Space then is connected to the concepts of entanglement and synchronicity of multiple time cycles seen in a single quanta of time as a ‘simultaneous present’ from a point of measure (the observer of Einstein’s cones).

It is from that concept of space as present from where we took the choice of space as form, to follow the principle of correspondence between previous theories (4D) and new theories that enlarge the previous view (5D). But because humans still hang on a lineal ‘concept’ and don’t understand cyclical, informative properties some precissions must be made. A

 

SYNOPSIS IN 2 PAGES OF THE ¬∆@ST SYMBOLS AND LAWS OF 5D APPLIED TO ALL ST¡ENCES

Main Symbols of ® logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 С:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,SS,TT); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

SS, @; u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

TT; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. ¬: Entropic limits in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration,.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T  x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3rd age death) 

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3rd informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆+1:O-informative age…

Relative Dimotions=Actions are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

They take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

Ideal Social scales & lanwaves are 1010 in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 100-1: ‘I’, 101-2: 3 generation S=T family, 102-3clan; ST-Geographic: 103-4: Town; 104-5:City; 105-6: State; S-Memetic: 106-7: Nation; 107-8: God; 108-9: Civilination; 109-10: Mankind.

In biology are called: Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’). Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

In Astrophysics: ¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

THE STIENTIFIC METHOD

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1st and 2nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

 

PART II. SPACE AS FORM. ITS ENTANGLEMENT WITH SCALE, TIME, MIND & ENTROPY.

Pentalogic: building up reality in 5 logic, geometric, ¾ space-time dimotions.

The pentalogic building of entangled symbiotic dimotions =stœps create ever more complex entangled forms in which the 5 dimotions of existence balance each other and the languages that reflect them, ‘as imitation of life’, the game of exist¡ence, STARTING always in a first fractal point-mind/monad that perceives an angular shrinking of reality into an inner world in stop, formal still position. But from one 2 is born, as the point moves tracing a reproductive locomotion along a line, through stœps; since every step of motion is followed by a stop of perception. So the first dimotion of pure angular information is NOT lost but already engages the point in a vital scanning of reality. It is from this constant inteaction of SS-minds and TT-flows of entropy from where the intermediate states of St-positional information, communication and Ts-kinetic energy, combine and finally meet in a relative balanced point ST, where to exist and reproduce. So we can consider a simple anagram of the function of existence, as Ss and Tt struggle to find an intermediate present ST point or vice versa, see the generation from a balanced ST point of its two elements, Ts-kinetic energy and Ts-informative communication, exi=st, becoming the ‘minimal’ ternary system in exist¡ence. The magic similarity of terms in ‘inglish’ due to the abundance of the ‘ST’ element in key words of such a simple human language make us wonder if indeed also phonemes encode a ‘secret’ Structural language of exist¡ence.

That game must be understood through the relationships of a(nti)symmetry between space, time, scale and the mind that warps them all. This ∆=S=T=@ symmetry or antisymmetry.

As the adjacent parts in space perform functions in time, which accumulate through the 3 scales of parts, wholes and worlds to guide in simultaneity parts in space functions in time and its cycles of different size and speed that accomplish the 4 dimotions of survival for the parts of the whole, which becomes then an ultra-complex knot of repetitive cycles that achieve those energy, feeding, informative, reproductive goals of the whole. This extraordinarily well-tuned group of cycles show however a remarkable resilience as one would imagine any system to collapse at the first error, abundantly provided by the competition in the ∆+1 world for resources of existence. It is for that reason that the whole organism cannot stand without considering that all those ‘points are worlds in themselves’ with mind mapping and an independent will of exist¡ence that accepts a role in symbiosis with all other points of existence. The mechanical creation of all those cycles without the concourse of ordering Maxwellian demons and repair mechanisms doesn’t last; nor the absurd reductionist view that is truly ‘Stupid in the Schopenhauer’s sense – renouncing to look for complex, rational explanations to reality. A mere chaotic selection process of survival of the fittest is only the final causality of death not the explanation on how the whole system builds up and only very simple entropic minds that believe without asking the whys of things can accept it as the ‘whole explanation’ of reality.

Yet how consciousness or rather memorial replication takes place? What is the e-motional mechanism that reinforces a given set of cyclical actions once they have been ‘done’ making cyclical memorial inertia the most clear mechanism for the ‘persistence’ of reality ? Somehow a system once the cycle is closed and repeats a certain step mirrors those steps into a logic mind algorithm and once the ‘step’ repeats itself in that logic mapping the image is reinforced and pushed a step further in the algorithm of memorial déjà vu consciousness Somehow in the smallest scale of the mind mapping, once we have returned to a known path a reward mechanism of ‘loosing’ uncertainty into the future and acquiring the certainty of the reinforced present cycle to achieve now comes into being. Memorial déjà vu imprinting requires then that the parts that take place into the larger cycle develop some capacity to mimic in its smaller O-parts the memory of what they must do. But the whole cycle, where it is memorized? One might think that certain elements of the symbiotic cycles with more memorial capacity – a nucleotide pyrimidine, in a biochemical cycle, a well connected stable neuron connected to calcium paths within its glia cells to store memory perhaps in DNA methylation, a chemical structure of protein 4D patterns, who knows, the possibilities become endless if we accept that the repetition of a cyclical pattern through a déjà vu, ever faster increase of memorial ‘enlightement’ becomes the site of the ‘cyclical inertia’ required for the whole Universe and its space-time Step and stop motion and form sequence to persist, repeat and finally arise the will and consciousness of exist¡ence.

Choice of words: space as ‘present time’ and form –time as the primary motion

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, synonymous of ‘dimensional form’, hence of static space imprinting it on motion. Look around you all what you see are forms in motion. Two parameters from where to start any philosophy of science and descend then to the details of each stience. But form turns out to be in detail, just a cyclical repetitive motion, a ‘closed clock of time’. And so reality is a tug of war between lineal motion or ‘time proper=entropy’ and cyclical motion or ‘mental, perceived form’, space. As both things are so closely connected the choice of ‘wording’ could be the inverse (in fact for very long I used exactly the inverse wording calling cyclical clocks of time=form, and open lineal space=motion, so some texts specially old graphs will talk of ‘informative time clocks’ and ‘entropic or energetic space’).

What this means is that ultimately regardless of choice of ambivalent human wordings, reality is an interconnected play between those two ‘larger concepts’, ‘form and motion’ and its geometrical shapes, lines and cycles, which mix together into intermediate ‘energy waves’. So to streamline all analysis of reality we must take a choice and call, cyclical form, space, S, and lineal motion, time. As I said the opposite definition which I took for longer would also be valid as ultimately motion and form, linearity and cyclicality, time and space are two sides in perpetual transformation: S <=>T.

What is wrong is the fact that man which is clearly a visual, lineal species, reduces both to ‘linearity’ so it considers ‘time lineal’, but also ‘space is lineal’. Man has so to speak a cubist mind that rejects cyclicality. This has also a gender biased cause. Gender is about cyclical females and lineal males, but lineal males dominated so they imposed its half truth, backed by lineal weapons, systems that erase the form of beings.

This makes difficult to choose a duality that pleases mankind. For if we choose lineal time and cyclical space=form, then it turns out that our concept of space as density of form increases the ‘less volume of space’ a system has till the densest informative system, the black hole, likely a top quark star with smallish quarks turning at amazing speeds in cyclical orbits, appears with 0-space. But if we consider cyclical time clocks, our Relativist physicists will cry out, as they use in their equations also a concept of lineal time.

So what to make of all this? Better to write the fundamental equation of the Universe, which I tattooed on an expressionist self-portrait long ago O-Só|-T (or if you prefer |<=>O; $<=>ð, different symbols which express the same. The Universe is a game of two parameters, still form and temporal motion, which merge together into ST-energy. And while the reader will expect according to his worship of digital machines to convert those principles into ‘algebraic numbers of measure’, digital numbers are about the 3rd parameter of reality, ∆-scale; but in a single plane is ALL about TOPOLOGY’, ‘geometry in motion’. Only when we introduce the 3rd element, ‘social scales’ made of social numbers, digital measures appear. This, mathematicians know: any digital proof doubles with to a topological one, independent of the first. And this introduces the 3rd symmetry of reality: S≈T≈∆; and its ‘trinity’ logic entanglements. All in all, it is ‘easier that a child enters the kingdom of heavens=knowledge’ and a kid learns typewriting than one scientist who learned with one finger, and a scholar camel who has a hunchback full of egocy makes the intellectual jump from ‘lineal, single time causality, to ‘trinity’ and pentalogic.

What is then truth is simple but to transform human ½ truths it requires a memoriless mind. The truth is that there are 2 formal motions, |xO=Ø, we decide by convention to call time x Space = Energy (spacetime). That reality consists in the eternal transformation and combination of both. And so the dominant element is Ø=iteration, present energy. Here it comes then another trinity of ‘human expressions’ to define them. Past, which we ascribe to systems with lesser form, as we age and wrinkle and get form as life species, so we shall call lineal Time, with lesser form, the relative |-past; and cyclical form, the relative O-future; with forms with motion that iterate and seem not to change, the relative Ø-present. But it is obvious that one can transform into the other. Form can be forgotten and rejuvenate a system. The 3 Time ‘arrows’ (past, present and future) that correspond to the 3 topologies of Space (|xO=Ø) transform into each other as eternal, and that is the new principle of energy that never dies but combines motion and form, space and time, into ∞ beings that is what the game of existence is all about.

Space does have multiple meanings as it exists in different proportions of form, of information in different states. But ultimately space is a state of present time, due to the reproduction, iteration of its forms that make the Universe immortal as each part of it keeps reproducing. A motion that has a memory of its form, reproduces as motion=time never stops; so the Universe constantly reprouces itself.

As in the Rashomon film where 5 points of view make up a better image of reality, we call any of those analysis the Pentalogic or Disomorphic method of science, which obviously does not substitute the experimental method but put an emphasis on a more precise understanding of the entanglements and relationships and common elements all T.œs (ab. Timespace Organisms) display.

We can then define the Maya of the senses, as form is really the intelligent synchronicity of all those cycles of space-time, both in quantum physics and in biological cells just the sum of ‘pathways’. It is then how we shall define reality as a ‘series of synchronicities and sequences’ of space-time ‘dimotions (dimensional motions), which we will call also ‘actions’ to correspond it with the fundamental unit of mathematical physics action, which is also the verbal unit of our conception of the life flow made of actions, which DO have besides motion form. Hence Hemingway told Dietritch, ‘don’t confuse motion – an entropic mindless wandering – with action’ – that has a form, a goal, a direction.

So space is the sum of multiple ‘smallish cyclical time flows’ seen from a larger enclosing membrane as a volume of space – a sum of synchronicities that knot multiple cyclical space-times symbiotic to each other. So they coincide in a ‘single moment of present’. And thus we shall see its sum as a form shaping a mental space. A simultaneous being in space is the persistence of this sum of frequencies of simultaneous flows.

Mathematically this is seen in the ‘emergence’ and ‘resonance’ from multiple time waves of a ‘Fourier function’.

In life from the fact that death and aging is really the loss of synchronicity of those metabolic and circadian paths. In society the same happens when the different organic parts, the informative upper neuronal class, and the reproductive class and the sustain of both – NOT an ill-designed 3rd human class, but the vital territory from where the two classes obtain its energy, loose its balance, as the informative class absorbs all the resources.

All those synchronicities then regulated by ‘larger’ reproductive=economic=thermodynamic networks, legal=informative=nervous gravitational networks make physical, biologic and social systems ‘synchronous vital space-time organisms’.

So that is a huge theme to understand logic space: how a series of synchronous cycles of ∆-1, ∆o and ∆+1 scales converge to shape a given seemingly simultaneous species. Those ‘collapses’ at a given discontinuous time of multiple cycles is what we call an organism of reality. The formation of such synchronicities are thus the detailed analysis of the emergence of scales of reality, which we wanted to shuffle between this paper and the ∆-paper on scales, but as Academia.edu is becoming a for profit company that tricks you to pay or else doesn’t charge your papers, wisdom will be one more time submissive to capitalism and I will just place it somewhere in this paper.

How different cycles become synchronized to produce the ‘resonance’ that is the emergence of a new scale of reality is the magic of it all. Your mind is just a final resonance of all the activities of your body. Your existence as a whole is the synchronicity of all the feeding processes that hook all the cells to the one-day faster reproductive cycle. The key to those synchronicities is 5D metrics: Size in space x time speed = constant.

Existence then of spatial supœrganisms the fundamental particle of informative space is directly related to the synchronicity of all the clocks of a system, to the point that you could call death the desynchronization of those rhythms; often caused by the tearing of the external membrane of the system, which liberates and lets the synchronous tighter cycles to expand and grow in size, slow in time and loose its rhythm. Entropy, the TT inversion of space as form happens when synchronicity is lost, and the form born and emerged in focus becomes ‘blurred’.

THE MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF SPACE. THE PENTALOGIC METHOD

Finally we can summarize the 5 different views of space if we focus in one of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe.

sT-Locomotion Space.

Humans have exhausted of space a single theme: its measure with machines of spatial locomotions, and that is what they mostly call proudly knowledge, and the lads that measured better space, Galileo and Einstein are revered as absolute genius of the tape (: LOL, I can’t help to quip from time to time. Locomotion is a huge theme of spatial analysis and the most important branch of Physics, called however the ‘science of motion’ as it focus mostly in the t, of sT, and the TT of entropy. This is not a theme that we care must about here. Paraphrasing Planck: ‘All what cannot be measured still exists’ and it is what matter to us – the logic entanglements of the Universe, not its shallow measure. The most explored and less interesting of all dimotions that have a spatial component is Locomotion, or translation is space, sT, in which motion is external and the internal form of Space s, is maintained but NOT considered as relevant for the analysis of the external translation, which is what physicists basically study ad nauseam. The result of this external view of a being as just a ‘particle-point’ moving in a larger space where it translates itself is the content of most physics. The most relevant question is how translation happens and why we don’t distinguish motion from form – the T and S states of the moving object.

This question is simply answered by Absolute relativity, and the iterative nature of motion, and requires a few comments we shall made on it.

St- space as communication of information

Closely related to the previous concept is space as information, that is, the motion of form in which form instead of motion matters most – as it carries an information which is what the receiver is mot interesting in absorbing. Space as information is fundamental to mental space, because it is the source of our mental spaces, which simply map out the information of the Universe, with waves that carry it in the form and frequency of its motion. Space with a bit of motion, St, is information, which maintains, even increases internal form.

So if sT is a ‘particle=form translating in space’; St is the wave carrying information emitted from a larger source. Particles hold ‘information in themselves’ but do not transfer it to the receiver. Waves do.

The measure of space in scales: organic spaces.

If space in time is a present moment, space in space (SS) is a mental space the relationship between space and the scales of the fifth dimension, is the entanglement of them in super organisms in which 3 scales of relative size and time speed, the cellular, organic and ecosystemic, or atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational, or individual, social and historic (mankind) scales interact. Scalar ∆±¡ elements form supœrganisms whose exchanges of St-information, ST-iteration and sT-motion define reality.

The fundamental scalar organism of the Universe, known to man is the galaxy, the realm of astrophysics, so we shall make a special analysis of it.

TT-Entropy and space.

The incomplete description of reality in ‘human Physics’ is based in TT-entropy – the dimotions with less information=density of space’ of the scalar Universe.

This kind of empty space gives birth to the big-bang theory of vacuum space, which we falsify in depth in the papers ‘Physics and entropy’ and ‘the Universe and entropy’, where we analyze the big-bang entropic model of the Universe. So we shall just make here a brief comment, to avoid so many repetitions (some necessary in the entangled Universe of nested supœrganisms, others redundant that will be erased as we keep expanding and correcting those papers throughout the 2020-21 years I will still work on them).

So we refer the reader to those other papers at academia.edu if they are interested in more details.

What entropy really means is internal and external motion that simplifies the cyclical space-time clocks that carry the information of a system in its form and frequency, converted into lineal, expansive inner and outer motion – an explosion of form into motion. And the biggest error of physical science is to consider this process the dominant process of the Universe. At this point though seems necessary to discuss the ‘choice’ of wording, which after all is a human wording.

But for a being’s perspective entropy are its limits. The limit of its life time beyond which it dies and its information dissolves. The limit of its membrane that separates him from the outer world beyond which its body-form doesn’t exist, and the limit of information of a system, when it peers through ∆±¡ scales, as beyond the scale from where it extracts its pixels of information to ‘form’ its mental space-time view, reality becomes a ‘dark space’. In the entangled Universe each Dimotion is related to the others. How then can we configure the limits of space – its entropic end? This can be done in terms of information. There is beyond a limit of a force ‘life existence’ a black out of information. So the symmetry of S=T=∆ works in the sense we only see space to a certain limit, which is the limit of life of our main language of space, which are light ¥-rays that have a mean life around 10 billion years, similar to that of their ‘organism’ of which they are the minimal cells – stars. This explains the fact that our Human perception of space (NOT the big-bang but the death of light) doesn’t reach further than a few billion years and dwindles with distance. It applies to any mind that perceives only a quantity of space. But it also means that all spaces are mental spaces, made with selective information, reason why non-E geometry is so important. All this is ignored by science.

SS-Space and minds.

We have described how a mind perceives in a quanta of time all the spacetime cycles of a supœrganism as a single present. But for that to happen, the mind has to extract with a langugage/force from each part of reality a ‘bit of information’ carried by the language, which then is focused in a smaller space-time or mind. So we write the equation of a mental space:

O’-finitesimal mind x ∞ cycles of space-time = Constant, linguistic mind mapping world: Ox∞ = C.

Present Space is thus also SS, is a mental, linguistic space. So all human spaces are mental spaces, constructed mostly with visual light and its 3 dimensional motions of height-information, length-locomotion and width-interation. And in the next paragraph we shall see how those 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of light, which for a light wave have vital meanings (the magnetic, electric and c-speed dimotions of energy, information and motion of a photon), for man are the ‘bits of information’ he uses to construct his human mental spaces.

Hence the enormous value of geometry, to describe the perception of forms and how species control its vital spaces and move on its outer worlds. Thus we expand the Non-E geometry of ‘scalar points with volume’ need that has hardly evolved since Riemann defined the 5th Non-E Postulate.

Present space as the function of existence.

Which of those 5 states is preferred by a system is obvious: S=T, the present state, in which both form and motion balance and allow the perfception of a dynamic reality that seems not to change as the actions of a system repeat themselves. We already saw that on the sequence of a worldcycle of life. It is for that reason that we talk of S=T and SxT as the function of existence, of present space=time, or energy function, or ‘existential momentum’, which is the state all systems try to maintain, even physical systems (as in Hamiltonians and Lagrangians, the key equations of all physical systems, where the ‘action’ tends to zero).

Indeed, from the duality between spatial mental, linguistic forms and physical motions; to the balances achieved by the similarity of both space and time, Si=Te becomes the fundamental ‘function of present’, and hence with the metric function of scales, $ x ð = K, the two essential functions to formalize single planes Si=Te, and multiple scales of spacetime. Yet as Si=Te maximizes SxT=K (5×5>6×4). We unify both in 1 function:

Max. S x T = C, defines for each fractal vital space-time organism its Function of existence, as all species will try to maximize its motion-entropy-time for its field-limbs, its information-spatial states for its particle-heads, whose product will give us its vital reproductive energy.

Moreover the function has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion & space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, S=T, locomotion, sT; and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions).

We thus have broken down the 5 Dimensional motions of reality, between two poles, SS-language of pure information, or ‘form’ and TT-entropy of scattering inner and outer motion, with the 3 intermediate combinations in a single plane of space-time, which can be seen in time as ‘aging’ processes and in space as the 3 topological parts of a being, written in ‘existential algebra as a feed-back, fractal generator equation:

SS¡-1 (seed-mind) < St¡(Head-particle)<ST (Body-wave) > Ts (limbs-fields) >> TT¡-1-entropy-death

The fact that with so few elements, we will be able to generate by iteration and combination all the multiple realities and laws of all sciences, might surprise the reader, which as we have stated earlier is a humind with the limits of ‘egocy’, ‘memetic imprinting’ and ‘linguistic creationism’ that will always make much of his thoughts crafted by the Schopenhauer’s stupid we all have within us. So even before we advance further on the analysis of those simple elements and apply the basic laws of existential algebra to explain the details, i.e. supœrganisms of every plane of exist¡ence, we have to resolve the nature of huminds and all other sentient minds of reality; since as we have seen motion and stillness are two sides of the same coin, defined by a relative mind; so there is a sentient component in motion, which should be properly written as e-motion. Motion perceives itself as an emotion that is the minimal sentient unit of reality. We thus write often e-motion or mœtion (as œ includes o and e), as the proper way to define them including the plane of sensorial perception and will to move that reinforces the program of survival and existence of the Universe, which consists in performing those 5 E-motions in a constant repetitive manner.

So reality is made of 5 Сmœtions of exist¡ence, whereas those wor(l)ds of ‘i-nglish’, include the multiple expanded meanings of the classic concepts of dimensions, motions, space, time, mind, science and scale.

It will be though increasingly difficult given the constrains of ‘surface thought’, natural to ‘one-dimensional minds’, to capture the ‘entangled’ connection between all those levels of reality, unless we make ceteris paribus analysis of each element and interaction. This is the more so in the III Millennium as huminds are fast loosing its fractal generator of thought, Space=form (Name) < ST-action (Verb); and simplifying with the unnatural language of digital thought proper of chips, their ‘mental capacity’ to understand reality and the past-present-future dimotions of time-space (which verbal tenses showed in all its subtlety. The systemic reduction of huminds to Schopenhauer’s stupids of digital thought (as we do not understand intuitively mathematics) of which we have shown already some practical examples (the theory of V=HoD), has made humans, as computers increase its digital mirroring of the Universe, mathematical creationists, and its minds forms of ‘surface thought’, who don’t require whys and verbal causality, but will resort increasingly to ‘nice digital pictures’ and ‘statistics’ (a posteriori causality, which reveals nothing on the deeper whys of reality), and likely make impossible the upgrade we are attempting here of shallow science into stience…

RECAP. Pentalogic Analysis Of Timespace Organisms

Space is many things when we make a complex pentalogic analysis of it. Human monologic considers space what the eyes see in simultaneity and a good deal of ‘physical thought’ has gone into measuring its distances simultaneously – all the talk of special relativity turns around how to do that from the humind’s perspective.

But in pentalogic terms space has more precise definitions.

S@: Space is a mental construct that selects information to cater to a certain mind. This kind of space is thus local, territorial, and multiple. Every point of view has an inner spatial, mental mapping in still geometry, which is its worldview. But every mind thinks that the space it sees is the whole Universe (ego paradox). As such mental space is self-centered, Aristotelian space. I.e. Humans ignore mostly that such is the web of reality. Even physicists work on the basis of naïve realism – ‘only what can be measured is real’ (Planck); and of course do not understand this paradox, but adapt reality to its point of view, origin for example of the paradoxes of relativity (contraction of length, as we ‘miss’ in our measure, which perceives speed as a continuous, the stop-step, position-motion duality). Mental spaces are infinite and thus are the key to select a certain species of information, with a better mental space. Selection of languages makes mathematics, and likely species with an ¡logic view of reality, the best survival species, reason why those 2 mental spaces have come to order reality.

St: Spacetime. Space added to time, space and motion is all what there is to reality. It is we might say the fundamental ¡logic particle – a bidimensional ‘fractal point’ in motion. We have then to consider that a fractal point, as a T.œ will always be performing in its higher plane of existence or ∆+1 world a function, which becomes an action or Ðimotion. Space-time then is composed of a T.œ and a motion. But space-time refers also to some profound questions, which in theory of measure – human obsession – leads to relativity formalism.

SS: Space on Space is twice stillness and position, when talking of mental spaces, or simply a volume that intersect two holographic areas. Space as space has no longer any form of motion. It is pure information so it can also refer to a seed, §, and as such show a potential capacity to expand and reproduce the program. Space as space is ultimately the reproductive present slice of time we perceive in simultaneity.

¬S. Space as entropy, is the expansive motion that decelerates and extends a system after death, growing the perceived simultaneous space of reality, erasing information and diminishing its content of lineal time.

∆S: Scalar planes of space within a given plane of the 5th dimension tend to be decametric, as the most perfect filling of a system. Planes proper are larger scalar planes with discontinuities, and so only 3 of such scalar planes gather together into a supœrganism.

Scalar planes of space are ultimately the mathematical structure of organic fractals, which is secondary to its entangled bio-logic functions – to reproduce.

We study every T.œ as in a pentagram, in which each points is connected to all others, each of the Non-Æ point-particles of the Universe as an entanglement of the 5 elements of reality, entropic limits, ¬, spatial topological organs, Ø=| x O, its temporal ages, from P$t through its present, Te=Si, into its decoupling of possible ƒð§, and finally the ‘bonding mind’ and its 3 parts, the singularity of information, the membrane that isolates the T.œ from the outer entropic world and its vital energy of ‘smaller, unconnected’ cellular points, which are in themselves fractal points with inner parts, hence also ¬∆@st of space-time.

The repetition of those analysis for each scalar plane of the being, according to a fractal principle of self-repetition of wholes and parts can be as profound as the information we extract from the system. Thus each of those elements, S, T, ∆, @ and ¬ can be analyzed from the perspective of the other 5. And so we shall use the Rashomon effect to define most systems of reality; seen structurally as a supœrganism of space, with ∆-scalar planes, time ages, spatial topologies, mind languages and entropic limits to them all, which gives us the acronym, ¬∆@ST, dust of space-time.

Any system must be studied, both in the same scalar plane, observing the relationships of each of those parts with the others, and the role they follow through its ‘parallel symmetries’.

For example, Space can be seen as a time motion not a distance, in differential geometry, in fast motion analysis, it can be seen as scalar, related to the different planes in 5D metric, it can be seen in relationship to the mind whose language cause our perception of space, and in its limits, the membranes above)…

Knowledge then becomes highly logic, not visual, as the shallow method of today’s knowledge. Organisms are entanglements that restrict and cause the paths and events we observe in reality. The WHYS are NOT visible, but entangled ¡logic, and the methods of this blog allow us to ‘contemplate’ those entangled processes.

As Supœrganisms (simultaneous, view of the worldcycle in space) act=live to reproduce (jumping over those limits) in 3 worldcycles (the placental, existential and world cycle, related to its 3 scalar planes) of existence, as each existence is limited by the self-centered mind and plane of stience in which it exists.

The pentagonal logic of the Universe applied to space.

This said, the proper way to fully grasp all the elements of space, is to consider how ‘space’ is perceived and entangled with the other elements of reality, either seen in motion state (the 5 Ðimotions of the Universe) or in static, structural form, as ¬∆@st of spacetime. So we shall in this post consider how space entangles with entropy, scalar planes, minds, ‘space itself’, and time-motion, using the ‘Rashomon truths’ of casting multiple perspectives in the being.

As usual in the pentagonal logic of the Ðimotions of the Universe §pace becomes more complex as it acquires properties of the 4 elements of reality, space, time, mind and scalar plane.

Let us then study §paœ from the perspective of the other elements of reality to have a kaleidoscopic, pentagonal I-logic comprehension of it.

Since we are all systems made of ‘fractal space’ (a part of the whole space of reality) and cyclical time (a process of changes and motions from birth into extinction). One cannot exist without the other. We are ‘Ðimotions of spacetime’.  But some knowledge can be acquired by ceteris paribus analysis of one element together. So we can study the dimensions of space-form. It does though require a more complex view that the simple analysis of 4D, which reduced the dimensions of time to a single one, locomotion, hence simplifying the understanding of those Ðimotions of timespace.

In the last paradigm, 4D, 2 dimensions of time, relative past and future are missing as Einstein studies basically simultaneous present measure of spacetime. It does so exhaustively and it is a remarkable feat of the humind but not good enough when we want truly to understand it all. So we shall here study Space in a more complex fashion, accounting for all its dimensions, interactions with the symmetric motions of time and relationships between them. To that aim we shall use the Generator equation and the multiple points of view of the Rashomon method. the key features of the Universe related to space – namely simultaneity and its scalar planes – namely organicism.

We are all §patial Supœrganisms tracing time world cycles and its generator equation. So after this introduction to 5D Laws – the ‘Universe in a nutshell’ – we consider the 5 varieties of space=time, St, Ts, SS, TT, ST, as they mix, space, time=motion, scale, and become synchronous images of still present reality in a mind. We shall do so in different disciplines, starting by Space in physics.


sT: SPACE AS LOCOMOTION: ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY

Let us go a bit further in the nature of spacetime Ðimotions focused on its ‘spatial-formal element’. We cannot be by all means exhaustive, so we shall introduce the key concept of physical locomotion, relativit, leaving the mathematical analysis of St-particles, Ts-fields and ST-waves and forces for the papers of 5D physics.

S=T DIMOTIONS. GALILEAN RELATIVITY

The clearest proof that minds exist comes curiously from the science that most vehemently denies them – Reductionist human Physics, which has always been concerned with its opposite, lineal motion and entropy.

Why? Because of the principle of relativity – the physical analysis of the duality of motion and form, as we cannot distinguish a system that moves from one that is static. This mystery contrary to belief has not been explained only described with mathematical tools. Why systems move but seems static is the concept behind Relativity, and its explanation one of the most important advances of 5Ð theory. Thus we shall consider first Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity with the principle of correspondence, as ‘limiting’ versions reduce to our simple light spacetime plane of a larger view, absolute relativity, the upgrading of physics of motion in 5Ð.

Galilean Paradox: SóT: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: The 5 Universal Dimotions

As it turns out the fundamental stiences of the Universe will be in its essential postulates connected to the simple metric functions of 5D, Max. SxT= C which is achieved at Si=Te. This second function in particular is the best possible definition of the fundamental principle of Physics, the principle of relativity, which defines the fact that we cannot distinguish between motion and form. The second metric function, which we shall call the ‘function of exist¡ence’ as it defines the program of survival of all entities of the Universe will be the basis of the biological behavior of all species that try to maximize its energy and information and reproduce.

It couldn’t be otherwise, since if we are space-time, space-time functions, in its widest expression, those of 5D must be the functions of all space-time beings, regardless of its physical or socio-biological nature.

Galilean Paradox: SóT: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: 5 Universal Dimotions

Galileo’s Principle of Relativity is the concept behind the relationship between the equality of time=motion and space=form and why one can converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; Si=Te’. And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

Relativity then becomes a duality, Si=Te, which is at the heart of every law of the Universe. Whereas the primary element, the ultimate substance is time=motion. As space is a Maya of the senses – a slice of time motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action.

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its Si=Te dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion

Earth moves in time, but we see it as a still form in space because reality is a constant game of ∞ motions, but the mind focus those motions and measures them at still distances. For huminds, motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/ distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we correct with Lorentz Transformations.

But physicists just substituted the Earth’s still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5th dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable Si=Te, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe); whose study is both mathematical, the main science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main stience of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

As all is time&space, the 2 experimental primary mirror-stiences of time&space become the most important to extract the Disomorphic=equal laws of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

In the graph below Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple ones), are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

They are also essential to all the elements of calculus and mathematics at large and its methods of solutions; specially the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between two points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. So lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations.

What neither mathematicians nor physicists fully understand (though some inroads in abstract were made through the Noether’s concepts of symmetry) is that each stœp of a method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

We call the 5Ð model of Relativity Absolute relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time arrow of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric equation’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word is ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’, proper of all minds that model reality from its p.o.v. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

It is then from the understanding that all spaces are mental spaces, as all is motion we perceive in stillness in the ‘factory’ of the mind, how we can and will build a proper meta-physical theory of the mind.

LocoMotion is reproduction of form in a lower scale. Stœps=stops+steps

Si=Te means any kind of Motion happens as a series of Stœps, as systems move a step, then gauge information in a stop position as the ∆±¡ plane provides it with pixels to orientate them, or a background motion deviates its lineal steps into cyclical motions. The proper way to write the function in dynamic terms is SóT

It is the essential beat of the cosmos in each of its fractal parts. If we consider space=form one of the poles of the Universe, and time=motion its 2nd pole, we shall be able to reduce all phenomena of reality, from the function of the mind in one extreme of pure still form (creation of mental spaces) or SS; to the locomotion of species (Ts) and alternate gauging of information (St) and its reproduction in a middle term combination of both poles (SS), to the pure entropy of internal motion that kills the system and external motion that ‘scatters it’ around (TT) as the 5 dynamic views of the 5 Dimensional motions of the Space-time Universe.

What physicists call ‘time’ is only one of the 5 Dimotions of reality, locomotion, translation=change of position in space; not all the times of the Universe. Its power in our technological civilizations as makers of machines of TT- entropic destructive motion (weapons) or transport machines of Ts-locomotion, their work has ‘hidden’ all other analysis of timespace dimotions, such as those concerning deep time scales (geological motions of Earth’s supœrganism), biological information (evolutionary motions), Historic cycles (censored by power as they are provoked by the wrong evolution of the ‘bad fruits=weapons’ of the tree of science, which gives power to people-castes of history, etc.) Thus by the ‘correspondence principle, physical time, expressed by Galileo as V=s/t is the ‘limit’ of a theory of time-space dimotions reduced to locomotions.

Reproduction of form in 5D and its essential mathematical tool: calculus.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time. This is the essence of it all. But space is a maya of the senses, the synchronous view of a series of cycles of time motions, knotted in the simultaneous perception of an observer; what physicists call a ‘frame of reference’.

Thus time=change is the fundamental element of reality, and this makes Algebra of time-change, specifically calculus perhaps the most important experimental science of time, besides logic, which we have upgraded to existential algebra, which explores the vital, organic whys of those changes.

It is the Galilean Paradox: S=T. We cannot distinguish time from form. In as much as each frame of reference or mind locks in a knot-mirror of the motions of the Universe from its point of view. So each point of space is a perceiver relative field of motions, which from its perspective knot as forces ‘attracted’ by its frame of reference. Yet if we cannot distinguish motion from form each point is entangled to those motions and is made of motion and form, of the particle and wave states.

Locomotion as reproduction of form solves the Paradoxes of Zeno and the meaning of discontinuity. As motion is reproduction of information, of form, since particles are knots of perception of form, fractal points, monads, that move by reproducing in a lower 5D plane, as ∆-1 waves, its information, as forms-in-action.

So all forms of change can be reduced to the ultimate function of existence, reproduction, a back and forth travel through 2 scales of the fifth dimension, as a form becomes a seed that reproduces, evolves socially and forms its whole again. The extraordinary capacity of Calculus, which extracts at ∆-1 level a ‘finitesimal’ (Leibniz’s 1/n definition of infonitesimal as a minimal part of a whole and ALSO, by virtue of S=T, a minimal ‘curvature’ of a time cycle, which is then integrated for a time duration of the event, either locomotion, or volume of population in space or S=T continuous=smooth change in time happens precisely because CALCULUS perfectly mimics the process of change and reproduction of form between ∆º and ∆-1 scale which is the basis of all time-change also in physics. Change thus is change reproduced in a lower plane as a seed that evolves into a whole.

And all this is what actually calculus calculates: It finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

It is then not so much in physics but in calculus where we find the strongest model of the laws of 5D and locomotion as a reproductive process of form, even if the experimental proofs are scattered all over physics. Indeed, the entire world of quantum physics can only make sense if we consider that particles MOVE AS WAVES and gauge information as stop particles. Because waves can be transparent to each other but particles collide. A simple proof: the atomic nucleus is so small compared to its particles that if they wouldn’t move as waves, transparent to each other, they would be always colliding and the nucleus would never remain stable. In fact, when we get pictures of those particles outside its shells, (electrons) they move in zig zag as they stop and change motion constantly. As usual physicists just make an axiomatic rule and subvert the law of causality converting the mathematical mirror derived of the fact in the cause of the fact – in this case they say this is due to the Pauli exclusion principle without providing the mechanism for particles to avoid collision if moving.

It follows that beings with more information, reproduce slowly and we can hardly see them moving. The limit of it being complex life superorganims on Earth, whose reproduction takes 9 months. It happens ‘inside’ the reproductive mother, and it reproduces in the adjacent space after ‘tearing’ the topological knot of the umbilical chord. A similar very slow process of reproduction happens in physics with the weak interaction that reproduces a form with even more information evolving the mass of particles, so the range of the force is minimal and the new particle appears adjacent to the one that disappears, dying for the new hatched ‘baby’ to be born.

They are also essential to all the elements of calculus and mathematics at large and its methods of solutions; specially the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between two points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. So lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations.

What neither mathematicians nor physicists fully understand (though some inroads in abstract were made through the Noether’s concepts of symmetry) is that each stœp of a method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

RECAP. All this said about the real Universe, we can go back and trace the beginning of physics and comment on its I-logic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, principles derived of the nature of space and time, not magically produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving. Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:

A dimension of spatial form can also be seen as a motion in time. Both together become a ‘Ðimotion’, the fundamental element of reality. It is the paradox of relativity of motion that started modern science but was not understood: Time Motions & space dimensions merge.

All dimensions of space have a hidden motion. This was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry has internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with must be a topological variety. In-form-ation, form-in-action thus was in fact a topological Ðimotion of space-time. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

THE MIND DEFINED BY THE S=T GALILEAN PARADOX. MIRRORS ORDER LOCAL WORLDS: LINGUISTIC EQUATION

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The key ‘unknown’ discovery Galileo missed was the mental nature of space –we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its TT-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Those 2 functions give origin to most spacetime topologies of reality. Absolute relativity implies the mind creates mental spaces =spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

Asymptotic perception of motions in the X-direction

Because height is the dimension of information and length of motion, both are asymptotic to each other, which explains the method by which light is stop in the mind. It follows that as frequency of higher amplitude have higher height, the perception of a light is ‘below’, on the formal ‘crest’ of its frames of lineal reference. Formal perception by SS-minds of asymptotic TT-entropy or ‘function of information is key to mathematical topology of changes from TT to SS through an energy region of combination of both of the form ST, giving us the classic ‘realistic function of existence, in ST in any science of reality.

In the graph, one of the many topological uses of the orthogonallity of the function of exist¡ence in its 5 Dimotions as they move through space-time (Relativithy theory).

The connection between Dimotions in time and Dimensions of Space is the essential symmetry, S=T, that justifies the forms of the Universe. Height=information, Length=entropic motion and the cross product between them, with all its multiple variations, from the structure of 3 Perpendicular light dimotions to forces, to Minkowski’s spaces, to the place of your head, to the mathematical function of exponential entropy, to the laws of complex space derive all from them :

Descartes. 3 Systems elements.

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

-Then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles already have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

So besides perception, the 2nd field of inquire about the Minds of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:

In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:

– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its SS-language.

– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘TT-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills.

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR OF ALL LANGUAGES AND ITS TOPOLOGIC SYMMETRIES, FOR ¡TS 5 DIMOTIONS

A key element of Universal mind s is Universal grammar. How a language carries information, which surprisingly happens in all systems in a similar fashion, given the fact that languages after all code the 5 dimotions=actions of existence of all organisms – its ‘sT-locomotion’, TT-entropy, ST- Reproduction, St-information and SS-density of information or mind-mirror. The laws of linguistics thus become laws of a Universal grammar that codes the creation of supœrganisms by controlling waves of similar forms with a ‘grammar’ that is also ternary in structural scales, from ‘phonemes’ that range around the 101-2 level of letters, and can be as little as 5 to code the 5 dimotions of reality, from 5 vowels in human languages, to 5 letters in genetic codes to 4 quantum numbers, or four type of chemical compounds, to more complex systems around the 10-100 scale, from 20 amino acids, to 80 atomic systems; to the next level of combination of words with those vowels, which range in the 103-4 scale. So we have around 2000 words in human languages, from a few thousands to 30.000 genes in the language of evolution of supœrganisms. It is not though the purpose of this paper to define the quantitative elements of languages. While the laws of the Universal grammar will be treated latter.

All systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: Si<=>Te.

Ternary Universal grammar expresses the Сmotions in verbal languages and human super organisms.

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its ∞ complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

What languages matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

Red colors (temporal entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (spatial  information) for animal visual languages.

The topological laws of orthogonality between the 5 Dimotions of space-time.

F(x):time-like parameter <(operandi: action)> G(x): space-like parameter, defines mathematical equations.

A simpler Boolean algebra in computers reduces all to 0 and|; truth or false, ±, and its combined duality gates.

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) x Length (Entropic motion)=XY(st): cross re(product)ion.

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y.

Such asymptotic equations of the form S=T, SS<<TT, S>ST>T, functions are the core mathematical model of the Universe, which can then be considered a function of existence of asymptotic Murkowski’s curves of space-time, under the existential function of perpendicular dimotions of space, time,

X(T), y(S), z(ST) are the 3 dimotions of a single space-time common to all forms that correspond to the 3 axis of Euclidean geometry. Yet because often X(T) is one-dimensional causal lineal motion, y(S) is bidimensional, curved, closed loops of information and z (ST) is a 3 dimensional combination of them, the simplest case of the 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimotions of light (above) becomes more complex as entropy, TT, Form, SS, become holographic bi or tridimensional beings with different |, O, or Ø-wave geometries. For example a physical force:

Forces:  Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy).

Thus width is the reproductive dimotion born through a dot product of an X x Y = Z event of a 3rd dimension of reproduction that combines the lineal function of motion and the height function of cyclical time space forms.

Form thus also depends on the choice of ST frames of reference: Motion is most likely a lineal or flat plane and information a curved dual dimotion which gives us a 3 dimensional Z function, as St- information ‘curves’ the lineal Tt-motions of entropy.

The inverse, complex dimotions of the 5th Dimension. Orthogonal forms give way to functional networks.

When we come to the two complex ‘dimotions=actions’ taking place in the fifth dimension between scales, we realize again, there is also two possible ways to travel, through 5D: upwards becoming part of a social whole, ∑∆-1<∆o, as we ‘release’ part of our TT-motion from ∆-1 and become ordered after the transfer that helps the emergence of ∆º. This in physics is misunderstood as the impossibility of a ‘perfect motion machine’ without entropy that leaves no behind any ‘energy for the ∆-1 forms to co-exist. But that is necessary or else ∆-1 would indeed disappear. So a motion of social evolution, releases entropic motion and increases order in ∆-1 to make ∆o emerge as a whole. Experimental and theoretical considerations shows an ideal 50-50 efficient distribution. So ½ of the energy is conserved and ½ is used to form and move the upper scale .

The 2nd complex dimotion through 5D scale is then the inverse ∆º<∆-1, seminal seeding. Form is now going down ‘first’ to seed and absorb energy in ∆-1 to form an arrow of social reproduction.

So the two only complex dimotions – as there are only two ∆±¡ directions in 5D appear as the combination of all others, as they also imply, St, Ts, and ST dimotions (absorption and emission of entropy and information).

Yet when dealing with the complex dimotions of ∆o<∆-1≥∆o reproduction and ∆o>∆+1≥∆o social evolution up and down the fifth dimension, we are NO longer in a 3Dimensional Euclidean space, so we enter into different non-E Geometries of which the commonest ones are those able to ‘multiply’ as they travel in size through 5D the number of parts going down, (Hyperbolic thinning networks as those of biological organisms). And vice versa; the whole must thin out the information of the lower planes to ‘achieve between them’ a synchronicity of time cycles instead of a multiplicity of individualities, and in this manner emerge as a simpler ‘geometry’, which explains why going upwards into whole scales, information thins out to become a simpler whole.

In physical systems the view is then a wave equation that also multiplies its forms and while there are fractal analysis of wave motions (notably in Nottale scalar relativity) we are NOT concerned in those papers so much on the overdeveloped in the age of the digital computer, exact equations of the morphological hows but in the causal whys: what matters to 5D travels we repeat is the integration upwards by social evolution and the multiplication of forms downwards by seminal reproduction.

Geometry thus is more familiar with the S<ST>T dimensional motions of a single plane, in its simplest perpendicular Cartesian axis, or its rather commonest, 1, 2, 3 dimensional growth from the flat X-Z, Y—Z sub-planes of TT-motion, bent into cyclical St-information, to reproduce in Z-ST.

And those are the functions space-like and time-ike most often observed by a trilogic Universal grammar of a visual or syntactic mathematical function.

While for the description of the full worldcycle, we need to explore the complex 2 functions of 5D, social evolution, going upwards to the future, or reproduction going 1st back to the relative ∆-1 past in inverse motion.

Thus we can define mathematically the 5 dimotions of space time as the product of 5 geometric r=evolutions in 3 5D±¡ planes, with the complex two functions of reproduction and social evolution above.

So we give the following names to the 5 Functions of the diametric of space-time:

X-locomotion, Ts, St, information Y, Reproduction ST=Z coordinates, social evolution, zigzag wave with a first positive growth, vs. reproduction in the opposite past, ∆-1 coordinates.

This function of existence then is the function from where all other functions of the Universe can be draw.

Yet the language of all languages is 5D and its ternary laws of time and space – a language that is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.

It follows that not only mathematics (geometry) is a mother science but also logic (the analysis of the causal processes determine by those Сmotions) is even more essential, and further on ‘evolution’, the evolution of forms and functions in temporal patterns summons them all. So those 3 sciences, spatial geometry, temporal logic and its combination, evolutionary theory, are the ‘3 subdivisions’ of general systems sciences, which apply to each science explain it all.

Over them, there is general systems sciences, the science this book can be considered its foundational book (as it formalizes and structures and advances all previous works done on it.) Below them, each specific science studies a scale of social evolution in the universe from the smallest physical systems, to its complex biological organizations and beyond its social organizing systems.

Since science consists in the definition of the type of points of each relative scale of size of reality, from the quantum scale studied by physics, through the intermediate human scales studied by biological and sociological sciences to the higher scale study by cosmology

Once those points are defined, each science studies their 5 actions, which define all its events and forms.

Study of the 3±1 actions: its bits of information, bites of energy, reproductive seeds and grammar.

Yet we study those actions through the 3 scales of size of the system, its bits and bites, normally of the smallest scales of existence, since:

–   We perceive with the minimal bits we can process to create the more detailed maps (<i-2).

–    We eat sometimes, similar species but break them into smaller parts (i<2). For example we eat meat but break it into amino acids, below the cellular level.

–   We reproduce a seed from the lower plane of existence (i-1). So we produce seminal cells and electrons reproduce emitting photons that collide and recreate an electron.

-We communicate with a language of information at the same level we exist (i), in order to create a more complex whole (i+1).

Thus we observe, as in many other laws we will be developing in this book, an infinite number of harmonies between sizes, ages, forms, functions in all scales of existence.

Actions are expressed with bites and bits of inferior scales. We perceive the smaller possible ‘bits’ (<i-2), eat bites of the inferior i-2 scales, reproduce with seeds of the i-1 scale and share energy and information with species of the same scale to create.

The bits of information (i-2), will usually be entities at least two smaller scales of existence.  The smaller they are, the more detailed the map made with its ‘pixels’ will be. So we can consider the possible existence of ‘gravitational minds’ that perceive a scale inferior to us.

I.e our eyes perceive light photons, the minimal scale of form. Ants perceive chemical pheromones; computers perceive electronic flows; all of them ‘forms’ of a minimal scale in relationship to the species that perceive.

The bites of energy will be pieces of the same or inferior scale. So we eat ‘living beings’; electrons feed in the lower scale of light; and black holes in stars. Yet once a system feeds it will further reduce what it feeds on another scale to obtain basic bricks to reconstruct once form through ‘2 scales’. So our body reduces food to amino acids, the minimal parts of life. And electrons probably reduce light to its magnetic and electric constants to create their fractal nebulae. And nations that conquer other nations reduce their people, minimal unit of the nation to slavery and take their gold to print their own coins.

So as we move upwards in the complexity of the actions we study there is a ‘growth’ of informative similarity of the bites and bits and a growth in size, such as informative bits are less similar and smaller than the bites of energy we feed. And this pattern continues when we consider the ‘expressions’ of the actions of social evolution and reproduction.

The expressions of social evolution are languages, which are naturally produced by the informative center of the system; except in the case of enzymatic evolution in which the language is external to the species (a species which acts as the reproducer and catalyst of evolution of other species; cells with viruses, humans with machines metal atoms with carbohydrates and so on). So the language is a ‘part’ of the being, often corresponding to an i-1 inner structure, though transported by an external force.

Finally the larger, closer form to the organism is its reproductive seed. And hence by the law of parallelism between species, the ‘bit’ of information for which the organism cares more: small quarks among simple particles, cellular seeds in life; jets of matter in galaxies. 

EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY: SS: PHYSICAL MINDS: SPACETIME VORTICES.

Correspondence Principle. 4D physics as a 5D limit reduces time to entropy and scales to a single plane.

The 5th dimension is also the key to resolve the pending questions of physical sciences. So, we shall respect the correspondence principle and translate the laws of relativity to 5D, to prove the veracity of both arrows of time, which are needed together to fully account for all the possible ‘dimensional motions’ (ab. dimotions) of the scalar space-time Universe. Since the 4D formalism is the ‘limit’ of 5D physics, when we ‘discharge’ times=changes of information reducing all the types of change=time of reality to translation in space (entropy and locomotion) and its mathematical formula, v=s/t in Galilean relativity, S2=S2(x,y,z)-(ct)2 in Einstein’s Relativity. And when we ‘compress’ all the scalar planes of space-time of the fifth dimension into a single space-time plane continuum, discharging all its organic and sentient properties, which we shall soon show are a direct consequence of 5D metric functions.

So the reader who is impatient to compare both models can go to page 21 where we deal with Relativity.

He must be warned though that the expansion of our understanding of space and time produced by the introduction of the second pole of internal change=time, evolution of form, information, classically studied only in biology to that of external change, translation in space, studied in physics, is so vast that despite the cult to our Baconian ‘tribal idols’ of science, our ‘seers of time’ (Augustine’s definition of God), relativity physicists will seem to him, once he has suspended his beliefs long enough to digest with an open reason the basic laws of 5D children, making simple ‘worldlines’ on the sand with a single rudimentary stick – that of lineal temporal energy. Since indeed as Parmenides already proved, the one is a perfect sterile whole – a single time dimension cannot generate anything, but when we have two poles connected by the inverse properties of form=still space and time=motion, across multiple space of size=scale, this entangled trinity will account for the whys of every event and form of the Universe in ‘exist¡ence’.

Its 5 Principles. Masses & Charges as scalar space-time vortices. Unification of forces.

Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Time curves space into mass.’ Einstein

We apply the correspondence principle and prove that Einstein’s previous paradigm on 4D space-time, based in the following 5 postulates/functions, is the theoretical limit of 5D in a single light spacetime plane:

Relativity postulate that states we cannot distinguish motion=time from dimension=position=form=space, which in 5D we reduce to a simple formula, S≈T; we shall call the Paradox of Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) as he couldn’t explain why the Earth moves but we perceive it in mental space as a still dimension.

Denial of Newton’s Absolute space-time; as he said ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start physics from its foundations’ and ‘I am the only physicist who believe there are ∞ time speeds in the Universe’, which we made explicit accepting Leibniz’s relational concept of spacetime, precursor of generational space-time, resumed in a sentence: ‘we are the scales of space we occupy and the cycles of time our existence lasts’.

Constancy of light speed, c that in a 4D single background plane of light space-time corresponding to the galaxy holds naturally, as light in a relational->Generational theory is the space-time of the galaxy, which generates through its ‘accelerated’ vortices of space-time in a crescendo of ever more dense scales, photons, electrons, quarks, atoms, molecules, matter states, cosmic bodies and black holes. Yet when we add a 5th Dimension sum of all those scales, c-speed becomes the limit when we reduce all the potential scales of the Universe to light space-time and the particles generated by it. And so we define a second metric function for all scales: Ts (Space size) x St (cyclical time frequency) = Constant; meaning smaller scales of space hold faster rotating particles, (black holes beyond the event horizon, where there is no longer ‘light’) or when moving in lineal fashion can go faster than light speed in scales below light or outside galaxies, (Bohm’s quantum potential of action at distance cause of entanglement, neutrinos outside galaxies.) As Si=Te maximizes SxT, both give the metric 5D function: Max. SxT=C, local to each Time§pace organism struggling to survive by Maximizing its St-in/form/ation & sT-energetic motion.

The principle of equivalence between Acceleration and mass, which we consider a strong principle, as a rotary accelerated vortex of space-time is a mass in the cosmological scale (ab. ∆+1), a thermodynamic Eddie in the human scale (∆º) or a charge in the quantum scale (ab.∆-1) Thus the principle can be written with parameters of space and time frequency as a case of 5D metrics, SxT=C, V(t)xR(s)=C, from vortices functions, to the 3D case, (M, C) = ω2 r3 /U.C. (G, k) which defines both charges and masses as quantum and cosmic vortices of 2 different 5D scales, whose G and k, Universal constants of S(curvature – Einstein’s formalism)= T(speed -: Newton’s), in 5D metrics have the measured 1039 difference of strength, solving the hierarchy problem. Since paradoxically, the smaller, faster rotating charge is more attractive than the larger slower galaxy. Further on, in 5D space time vortex metrics a proton shows to have a Schwarzschild Radius, showing the scalar similarity between galaxies, as ‘atoms’ of a hyper-universe and dark expansive energy, as ¥-radiation between them.

Energy-mass, E(t)óM(§) in Planck Units coils entropic lineal motion into collapsing matter, E->M. As when the accelerated dark entropy between galaxies collapses into galactic mass, warping one-dimensional motion into 3D mass vortices (hence balancing the expansion of intergalactic space, 75% of dark entropy, into 25% of mass vortices, as 3x1D entropy becomes 1x3D masses; leaving the total volume of the fractal immortal Universe unchanged. While its inverse process is a scalar big-bang when a spatial space-time vortex, hold in its attractive position as an accelerated clock of time-space becomes entropic motion, uncoiling its form into lineal motion: M->E, in any 5D scale of spacetime; from a particle’s Beta Decay, through a Nova explosion, a galactic quasar, or perhaps a cosmic big-bang, a ‘hyperbolic’ theory of the whole, which we shall doesn’t hold in 5D as it studies only the entropic expansion of intergalactic space, ignoring the balancing collapse of entropy into galactic masses, doesn’t pass the epistemological laws of truth – known case, experimental evidence beyond local measures, correspondence principle with the known-known laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum and baryon numbers), and we falsify in the paper on Cosmology, concerned with the building up of an epistemologic sound model of the fractal, organic, immortal 5D cosmos.

Thus we call the new 5D model Absolute Relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time arrow of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric function’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word would be ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’ proper of all minds, which model reality with its shortcomings. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

RECAP. The metric function of balance and feed-back SóT, between the spatial, informative mental pole and the reproductive, cyclical motions of Time becomes the basis of Relativity and all physical motions, establishing the fundamental ‘beat’ of all local space-time organisms of the Universe. The principle of correspondence consider the 4th Dimensional formalism the limit of 5D in a single ‘space-time scale’, equivalent to Galileo’s formula, V=s/t which special relativity adapted to the ‘contraction’ (-ct) experimented when the speed of a system reaches the limit of our thermodynamic planes of space-time, on the border of the quantum/cosmological, ∆±3 plane or light space-time continuum and General relativity adapted to the cosmological, gravitational ∆+±4 plane of the fifth dimension; which requires for a full understanding a more advanced knowledge of 5D metrics and Physics. So we shall return latter to those themes and also deal with them in detail in our papers on cosmology and quantum physics.

In the galaxy the same balance happens between the vortices of mass-time and the entropic time expansion of energetic vacuum spatial information. In terms of the 3 ilogic dimotions of past-entropic time, future-informative time vortices, the intermediate state, combines both: What we call present time is the dynamic, feed-back repetition of reality which seems not to change because it repeats the same cycles. Physicists have reduced time to the arrow of entropy, born of its worldly profession of making weapons and transport machines – even to the point of ignoring in the cosmos the balancing imploding informative action of gravitation that collapses vacuum energy into mass, so they can maintain that the Universe is only expansive vacuum between galaxies (the so called big-bang theory).

EQUVALENCE PRINCIPLE. UNIFICATION OF CHARGES & MASSES AS PHYSICAL MINDS & SPACE-TIME VORTICES

In the next graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale.

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆±1 scales.

All what exists is a motion in time. Space forms are still pictures of those motions – a Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

So we translate 5D metric into vortex equations in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = C, which is the equation of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster metabolic rates than an elephant.

And vice versa, larger systems in Nature must have a space-distance=time-speed much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in time.

A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-space. Attraction laws are then evident and intuitive: In the same manner a vortex of a storm attracts more the faster it turns, sucking in its surroundings, any accelerated space-time vortex, increases the speed of the mass/charge clock according to 5D C=st metric, the smaller it is (S) and hence the smaller it turns, the more it attracts.

UNIFICATION OF 5 GALAXY’S FORCES AS ITS 5 DIMENSIONAL MOTIONS, WITH SCALAR SYMMETRIES.

Since a charge is smaller than a mass, it attracts much more and the unification equation follows just when we apply 5D metric, and shrink the galaxy in the same proportion we accelerate them. Then both equations match:

So mass, E=mc2 + E=hƒ; hence mass = frequency (h/c2) is a cosmological slow vortex, and charge a quantum faster more attractive vortex.

Further on since curvature is synonymous of cyclical speed, it can be quasi-infinite in the smaller vortex, when measured in time speed as the speed of angular rotation. So if we were to apply 4D curvature’s equations (Einstein) instead of Newton, the results would be the same, just in the far more complicated formalism of EFE.

Those are the essential concepts to define charges and masses as accelerated time vortices of two different scales of the Galaxy. And from that it is only just an easy task of mathematical manipulation to unify them in 5D metric, as both are equal: when we slow down the speed, space enlarges to remain co-invariant. And as it happens a Hydrogen atom enlarged to the size of a galaxy slows down in rotation to the angular momentum of the galaxy. So Kaluza–Klein were right – the fifth scalar dimension unify gravity with electromagnetic forces but in a fractal manner, with 5D metric, unbeknownst to physicists.

Once we do have a proper understanding of the 5 Dimotions of physics it is very easy to refound the science and its equations in far more straight-forward general laws proper of all space-time systems and solve most of the conundrums of physics, embroiled by the error of lineal time and single space-scales.

Since as long as physicists don’t accept ‘duality’, trinity and pentalogic, the use of entropy and information as equal arrows of time, they will not be able to resolve the conceptual contradictions of its disciplines.

It is just another ‘practical case’ derived from the scalar fifth dimension, which first was rightly (even if the maths were somewhat faulty) introduced in conceptual terms by Kaluza and Klein as a mode to unify ‘two different scales’ of size of the Universe, the gravitational ‘c’ scale and the ‘Planck’ h-scale, which are the two limits of the galaxy’s 5th dimension metric: S(c) x T(h) = Cst.

What mattered of his concept now forgotten is its idea that both scales could be unified if we treated them with a similar jargon, which for obvious reasons could only be the jargon of ‘Relativity’, derived from Poisson’s jargon, derived from Newton’s jargon of ‘vortices of space-time’ – our cyclical clocks and orbits of planets above. So for sake of simplicity we shall use the easy Newtonian jargon, to unify both scales according to 5D metric – the so long seek Unification equation of charges and masses.

The unification of the 5 forces in terms of its 5D metric scalar equations, and its equivalence with the 5 dimotions of the galactic organism requires a deep understanding of the S=T paradox that makes any ‘state of stop-space’ equivalent to a ‘motion in time’. So we can study mathematically with different ‘spatial, topologic’ vs. algebraic, temporal equations and ceteris paribus perspectives every event of time-space; which accounts for the diversity of formulae for the same forces:

In the graph below regardless of pedantry in physics, the 4 formalisms of gravitation are equally valid, as they merely reflect the degree of detail in our analysis, either in ‘space=static’ form (Relativity-curvature) or dynamic motion (Newton), from a dual scalar view (Poisson gradient), or based in the conservation principles of the 3 ‘parts’ of a physical system (Lagrange). We shall then use here the earliest, most evident, simpler dynamic view – Newton’s timespace vortex, to unify mathematically the 2 limiting scales of the galaxy: the quantum world of charge vortices & the cosmological scale of mass space-time vortices.

The principles that matter are Einstein’s equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we extend to all scales. So an attractive cyclical force is an accelerated clock of space-time, a ‘vortex’ of any scale:

Newton is a dynamic view, Einstein a static one. Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. As it is a spatial view of ‘still derivative pictures’ of the gravitational motion it is more detailed than Newton’s because it is according to the Galilean paradox (S=T) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.

Lagrange’s on the other hand is a complete different view, as it does not take the S=T geometric-temporal perspective but the principles of conservation of a physical organism St(angular momentum) < ST-energy>ts-lineal momentum. But all those principles ultimately derive from 5D metric. In the case of Newton>Poison> Einstein, the vortex law, V(t) x R(s)=k, in any number of dimensions (3 in this case), the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, from the conservation of energy, S=T, as the balanced point of present of all systems.

Einstein’s just reduces the temporal continuous Newtonian view of a spacetime vortex into an ∞ number of infinitesimal detailed pictures, focusing not on the speed but on the curvature of the vortex (which is the spatial definition of a moving cyclical speed – the faster it turns, the more curvature it has in ‘still mathematics’).

The fundamental consequence of treating charges and masses as accelerated SS-vortices of spacetime is obvious: both are just vortices of two different scales of the 5th dimension, which frame the limits of human perception of the Universe, so we can unify both with a simple translation of 5D Metric C=SxT such as if we expand a charge and decelerate its speed it will reach the size of a galaxy, while its electron will reach the size of the star nebulae that surrounds each black hole=proton.

Let us do the maths in the simpler Newton’s formalism, whereas by the paradox of Galileo S (Curvature) = T (accelerated motion). So the Universal Constants (G, k), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales (∆ is the symbol for the different ±¡ scales of the fifth dimension within a given organic system). Its formalism of a vortex of time space is then Newton’s Unification Equation:         M,Q= ω2 r3 /U.C.(G,k)

It applies to all vortices of time-space from particles to planets to galaxies.   For example if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain k with a 1039 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem. As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, so it is symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It works marvels when we translate electromagnetic jargon to Newtonian jargon. For example it shows the ‘isomorphism’ (systemic jargon for an equal ‘form’ between scales) between atoms and galaxies, which H-atoms of the cosmic scale.

Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and its electronic orbitals its star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos.

Let us put some easy numbers by substituting the parameters in that Unification equation for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G, which any high school student can do:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 mˆ3 rad. sec.-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal systemic view of the fifth dimension was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron); 5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius); proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.
Since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant is a gravitational constant, and c, light speed, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black star.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is isomorphic to the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
Those results (more than a decade old), are a 1st theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the 3 standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal self-similar structure as $t (Space population) x ð§ (Temporal frequency) entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Galaxies, (Galaxies≈Atoms) thus resolve the philosophical question on how many 5D scales exist; as we find enough self-similarity to ‘run again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal) both by quantitative and qualitative methods between the atom and the galaxy. A question that might be extended to the ST dualities of open, ‘entropic strings’ and closed ‘cyclical informative strings’, in a possible larger and smaller scale of microscopic strings and superstrings:

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Philosophy of stience would then argue that those scales are real, but part of its self-similarity is mental: that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10±30 scales.

What about the Hyperuniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

The scalar unification of forces opens up an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, but fractal relativity, the description of the ∆-1 quantum world as a similar scalar plane of space-time to the ∆+1 cosmologic world.

“I would like to emphasize something. The theories about the rest of physics are very similar to the theory of quantum electrodynamics: they all involve the interaction of spin 1/2 objects (like electrons and quarks) with spin 1 objects (like photons, gluons, or W’s) within a framework of amplitudes by which the probability of an event is the square of the length of an arrow. Why are all the theories of physics so similar in their structure? There are a number of possibilities. The first is the limited imagination of physicists: when we see a new phenomenon we try to fit it into the framework we already have—until we have made enough experiments, we don’t know that it doesn’t work. So when some fool physicist gives a lecture at UCLA in 1983 and says, “This is the way it works, and look how wonderfully similar the theories are,” it’s not because Nature is really similar; it’s because the physicists have only been able to think of the same damn thing, over and over again.”

Richard Feynman. “QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter’

So what about the unification of the other forces in scalar couples? It follows immediately when we consider them the scalar symmetry and similarity of the 5 Dimotions of the galaxy:

The Scalar similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is immediate as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). While the weak force is NOT a force but the evolution of the families of particles between scales.

Because physicists only consider one scale and one time arrow they are obliged to model all those forces, with lineal concepts reducing them all forcefully into an exchange of lineal particles, when they are clearly different forces. For example the weak force that happens in a single point transforming a particle into one o a higher scale of larger masses, is represented with a gap that ‘exchanges’ the W-particle, NOT as Fermi shown first, an evolution of a higher particle into a heavier one, that then suffers an entropic process of dissolution in 3 parts.

Such 5D variety of forces makes possible the organic functions and structure of self-similar atoms and galaxies. So we couple forces according to their ∆±1 ‘symmetry of scale’ as 5 forces equivalent to the 5 dimensional motions, ab. С, of physical systems within galaxies. They must be studied in dualities, belonging to two different scales – the cosmological, ∆+1 scale (gravitation & dark energy) and the ∆-1 quantum scale (strong force and electromagnetism); whereas the dualities relate gravitation and strong forces and electromagnetism and dark energy; while a transformative, ‘weak force’ trans-forms particles between 5D scales.

RECAP. Because all systems made of scales of vital space that last a tie cycle, they all have bio-topo-logic properties. So we need always 3 scalar perspectives that give 3 symbiotic properties. In the galaxy we talk of:

  1. A scalar view that defines a galatom, by similarity of the atomic and galactic scale unified with 5D metric.
  2. A Human view that defines the galaxy, our present single perspective with a single light spacetime continuum.
  3. A Galactic view that defines a ‘galacell’ that is the galaxy as an organism, controlled by ‘DNA-like’ black holes. So we can now study the galaxy as an organic system with its 5 Dimotional, organic networks of forces.

Haldane said, the universe is more complex and strange than humans can understand or even imagine. Yet its basics are simple – a property of fractals that by self-repetition and recombination originate from a simple Generator equation, infinite variations of the same theme: the scalar supœrganism.

Forces as Languages. The reproduction of an organism as motion in space.

All this said 5D differs strongly from 4D with its simplex lineal time, single space-time scale and single mathematical language in the comprehension of the Universe. Since all forces carry information and hence must be considered also languages of communication between atoms, particles and galaxies of the higher scale. For that reason when we study galaxies as supœrganisms, it is necessary to introduce forces as languages.

Indeed, atoms as supœrganisms communicate information through forces as they build a social entangled, ‘parallel’ system, which explains realistically the Lorentz transformations. In the ∆-4 ‘quantum potential scale’ of faster than c speed to particles that are to communicate, as all systems that emit information – think of you walking with your friend while talking, must according to the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry exist in parallel. So particles first communicate in the background neutrino scale and when they are in simultaneous, equal distances, they emit over the neutrino ‘line’ that measures only distance, a higher level of information (neutrino theory of light, first considered by the true master of quantum physics, Mr. De Broglie, before the Bohr Mafia took over with its egocy theories, now resurrected as proofs keep mounting on his realist view of quantum physics, and the needed synchronicity of any organism in its 3 ‘St<Ts>ST-planes’ ( particle, quantum potential field and wave). The scalar Universe builds organisms by reproducing all its scales from the bottom up. When you move your hand you are not moving (solution to the Galilean paradox of relativity, and the paradox of Zeno) but reproducing your information in the next adjacent topological space-time. And then you keep building new layers. This in physics starts with the entanglement of distances in the faster than c quantum potential through emission of a neutrino that localizes other particle. Thus both become entangled in parallel distance, which when we try to measure it in the ∆+1 human scale where the macro-organisms are seemingly moving respect to each other, as we cannot perceive the ‘go and stop’, wave-particle, break and move way in which particles and waves move (but when observing electrons – see graph) we indeed see how they move, stop change direction and advance as in zigzag through a kind of Brownian motion) we need to introduce the special relativity elements for the description of a smooth continuous motion that discharges the stop and go. In reality there are not such paradoxes that distort the real spacetime of particles. It is like a movie: as electrons stop to perceive as particles information and move as waves, measure is always done between stopped electrons, the emitter and the observe, fixed by an infinite, non-local ‘gravitational string’, so they can perceive and measure, and so ‘we do not add’ (Michelson experiment) speeds, as both are in stop position.

It is the same effect that let us perceive motion in film, when in fact light only ‘projects information’ in stop and then ‘go’ (it is a Universal law of ∆st as information is the still form of a time-cycle of motion); but as it is so fast (so it is the electron stop, emission or reception of information, and go, wave state, left upper graph) we DO see the stop and go as continuous light ‘camera motion’:

Thus this means all relativity is false? No; it is just the ∆º macroscopic translation to our scale where motion seems continuous of the discontinuous, detailed stop and go way in which electrons and photons feed and perceive light. So it works as measure tool, but we must stress  that from the ∆-3 p.o.v, of electrons the Universe looks very different with no spooky effects of length contraction and time dilation (of its internal clocks), as those are ‘virtual effects’ biased by the human/mechanical electronic mind:

Without having the perspective of multiple scales, with different time speeds and forms of discontinuous and continuous measure, from the human scale of continuous ‘bulk’ perception, both speeds should ad (Galilean relativity), and so the earth’s different orientation of motion respect to the sun’s light should change the speed at which we perceive light, adding or resting to c. Yet because our eyes or mechanisms of light measure are electronic, entangled at quantum particle in a stop state with the electron that emits the light beam we DO measure two stop emitters and receivers of light. So it is always c-speed with no dragging.

So as we move, we build up in our ‘imprinting’ of the different scales of which we are made. And this implies that the more ‘scales’ of complexity we are made of, there will be slower speed, so a new symmetry between scale and speed of time, ∆≈T appears: the more complex and ‘dense in information’ a system is, the less speed it will have. Reason why the maximal speed of the ‘perceived human’ ∆±3 Universe is c-speed, since light is the first scale of information we form departing from the initial neutrino ‘line’ that entangles the particles in the background below light spacetime. This scale of speeds therefore shall be roughly a decametric scale, as the ∆§cales between planes of space-time (see our paper on non-Euclidean geometry and non-Aristotelian algebra) are decametric scale. And this is indeed the case. Since the maximal speed without distortion of form of electrons, the next scale after light is around 30.000 km./s (1st Bohr orbit), the speed of the next scale of Hydrogen atoms in gaseous state is around 3.000 km. s and we can keep building up scaling up in the organic ‘branching’ of molecular matter to the human 30 km. second speed of space-time.

All this gives us a simple re-interpretation of the formula of speed in terms of information: V=S/ð which uses the term for cyclical time, ð, as opposed to lineal time, t (while for space, S is cyclical space and $ lineal space, though we could also write |-t O-t, O-s and |-s)… whereas the less ð-cyclical time information the faster the perceived speed, and so when ð->0, past the level of light information, the first scale we perceive, speed tends to infinite, reason why the invisible ∆=4 scale of gravitation is non-local form a human observer, of infinite speed. Wee can also in complex pentalogic analysis of locomotion in physics (considered latter when we complete the papers of physics in pace and physics in time), perceive such non-local speeds as a relative motion to the past of an ‘antigravitation’ or ‘antiparticle’ wave, whereas the ‘past motion’ of the particle (as in Feynman diagrams) is compensated by the v=s/t interval to the future, cancelling each other for a present motion that creates the sensation of a simultaneous gravitational present space. All the previous considered analysis are ‘right’ as they just as in the case of the different ways to represent gravitational forces, points of view of pentalogic. So if we group those pentalogic views in duality.

St vs. Ts: the point of view o null f information, gives us infinite speed for non-informative particles.

Ss vs. TT: The point of view of relative logic future information vs. relative entropic past, cancel each other for a single present.

ST: So finally we observe that the background gravitational scale forms a present simultaneous space to light-species that ‘live’ above it. This happens for all other supœrganisms where a ‘background space forms a present sheet, in which to imprint information carried in simultaneity, giving birth to its ‘quanta of space’.

Present space then is the fastest, lowest scale of a supœrganism, which appears for its slower higher scale beings as simultaneous given that 5D metric makes their SxT=C mental quanta a 10n times slow (where the n power depends on the degree of complexity of the next scale in terms of number of entangled dimensions, as there are ‘one-dimensional, bi-dimensional, 3D up to 5D minds ;¡ logic complex themes not dealt here).

Inversely the forms of maximal density of information are still and so we can consider that minds are the points of maximal density of information of any given supœrganism, which appear still for all the internal parts of such organism.

Thus mass is a measure of the density of information of a physical particle, which increases as its 5D St-vortex accelerates inwards, past the c-event horizon, increasing to faster than c-speeds in the ∆-4 gravitational scale of the black hole, which therefore appears as the self-centered still point of the galaxy, and the brain is the still center of our organism, reason why we see through the mind a still universe, and become the self-centered point of our frame of reference. So we can calculate the ‘existential force’ of a particle according to its Mxa, ð-cyclical speed, maximal for the black hole related to its existential momentum, SxT or speed of reproduction that gives ultimately its predatory power. Indeed, black holes are the top predators of maximal existential force of the galaxy, so when they collide with any other species, they prey on it, as what comes out of the collision is a new black hole or a larger one, which has devoured its mass. So when a baby black hole is born, according to Hawking’s 5D equation of ‘information’ not of entropy, it grow exponentially as it cools down: ∆M (Bh)= C /ÑT.

In our mental Euclidean space we measure everything along the 3 relative coordinates of that Euclidean space, provided by the 3 dimensions of light, as if they were still – dimensions that have also a vital meaning, height for information from an advantage point of view, length for locomotion and its SxT combination for reproduction; which are not only mental spatial dimensions but very much organic dimensions, since when a system evolves morphologically through ontogenesis, those are indeed the dimensions for the vegetal and animal pole, for the growth in parallel of reproductive cells, so you get fat in width, you grow in height of information and you move forward – themes those treated on the papers on biology and space. In the next graph we see a resume of the first scales of physics, where the neutrino line feeds the creation of light, which ‘bends’ the line into frequency thus reducing its ‘speed-distance’ by a – ct element which is input in our Lorentz transformations to adapt it to our view from above, and further on the 3 dimensional motions of light that for a photon are its vital dimensional motions of ST-reproductive speed, St-information and TT>Ts-feeding. Needless to say as in the case of the inversion of dimensional motions between prey and predator, plant and animal, which balance each other, so plants have down the brain, up the feeding flat leaves, and animals inversely up the head that perceives light as information, down the feet, and one breathes O2 and the other CO2… the inversion of neutrino vs. light vs. electronic dimensional motions both in Euclidean and Ox|=Ø topological varieties balance each other, So as the universe reproduces its waves of formal motions it keeps balancing expansive and implosive, lineal and cyclical, up and down, ˙∆=S=T=@ symmetries all the way to the 25% 3 Dimensional balance of matter vs. 75% one-dimensional expansive entropy between galaxies that explains why ‘Brooklyn is not expanding’ (: and the big-bang is not the birth of the whole Universe.

RECAP. 2 consequences of the scalar, cyclical nature of space-time are the basis for the whys of astrophysics: cyclical big-bangs in all the scales of reality; and scalar disomorphisms between galaxies and atoms.

The cyclical, fractal big-bang, is the last TT-entropic dimotion of a galaxy, 1 of many supœrganisms of the immortal, informative, ∞ universe, sum of all ¡ts other fractal parts made to ¡ts image and likeness. So the same laws that describe the Universe apply to every ‘space-time Stience’ & supœrganisms, its parts and wholes– different variations of the same vital game that range from a human being, to a crystal mind, to an ant. So we can compare a galaxy, both with an atom, as + top black holes are equivalent to + protons and the halo of negative strangelets, are equivalent to electrons; but also when observed in greater detail with a living gala-cell, as stars are ribosomes producing middle black holes and planetoids become micro-black holes and strangelets that fuel as mitochondria do the homeostatic temperature that activates its larger forms. So if humans produce them in accelerators searching further proofs of the big-bang Earth III will find earlier its destiny (see paper Earth III and entropy) and migrate to the protein-like Halo –‘membrane’ of the galacell, made of lineal strangelets.

Those comparisons work because all systems are space-time organisms. So a galaxy centered in a black hole is similar to an atom with its electronic cover, and self-centered nucleus accumulating most of its informative high speed vortices of St-mass, while our existence happens in the irrelevant intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged. So what the galatom IS the fundamental ‘bio-logic’ particle of physics, but also follows the Disomorphic laws of any bio-logical, social, organic system.

S=T: THE UNIVERSE AS A FRACTAL ITERATIVE SUPŒRGANISM OF SCALAR SPACETIME.

We already mentioned that topology has found that the 3 types of forms of fractal space are in fact networks of smaller points with volume (non-Euclidean points) connected by flows of energy and information. So instead of topological varieties we should talk of networks of points that form lineal, moving limbs/fields, territories; cyclical networks that form informative heads/particles/informative classes in command of the language of financial and legal power of societies, and body/waves/working classes. And this is truly the best definition of space; what holds it together as a form. Space is ultimately about supœrganisms.

Systems sciences define the Universe as an organic fractal evolving socially into larger scales through networks of energy and information, each one studied by a science. So in this simple trinity of 3 parts, which becomes adding cellular points into wholes a pentalogic scheme of 3 ∆±1 scales structure all systems of the Universe, with ‘disomorphic’ (equal laws). So we can study species as organisms living a world cycle and evolving finally in social networks becoming super organisms, the most efficient survival strategy of the Universe, where a head-particle-informative class will invent a language of common organization, quantum numbers, hormones, genes or memes, money or laws that all the body-wave parts/cells/citizens will obey. The goal of systems sciences is then to properly apply the physiological laws of networks to design or study perfects organisms of nature, including mankind and the economic ecosystem. Topological evolution explains questions those already asked by Darwin: why informative, cyclical forms evolved so fast (eyes), or why wings of flat motion appeared with a few mutations, Answer: because there are only 3 topological forms=functions in the universe. So mutations render either of the 3 forms NOT anything goes.

The graph shows the physiological networks of the main super organisms of the Universe.

The structure of super organisms

Let us understand the generic structure of any social organism, or ecosystem, made of multiple supœrganisms. Made of four basic elements common to all organic living systems:

  1. Cellular units: ∑œ¡-1

2. Networks that reproduce energy energy forming a body-wave of vital spacetime: ST¡

  1. Networks of locomotion and entropic feeding (limbs and fields or territories), Ts¡ or Herds.
  2. Networks of information: Particles, heads or informative neuronal class: St¡

When we find those elements interconnected in a vital entangled relationship, we talk of a supœrganism.

If we find a population joined by a single network we can talk of different systems according to the ‘dimotion’ = action that gathers them:

– Herds joined by an Ts-locomotion or TT-entropic, feeding action.

– Lanwaves joined by an St-informative language.

– Species, joined by a ST-reproductive dimotion.

When multiple organic systems co-exist in the same ‘entropic territory, we talk of “ecosystems” We should not be cheated by the spatial appearance of the organism; because information is often invisible (5D: Max. T x Min. S) so even Non-Euclidean points that are far away, might be a lanwave or superorgainism.

A herd of machines, a herd of insects, a human group is also an organic system, because it has cells, and networks, even if it does not seem to us a body. The fundamental reason we have not arrived earlier in science till Theory of Organisms, to the conclusion that the universe is made of such organic systems is the arrogance of man. Men have a hard time believing that things, which are not like us, are able to intelligently process energy and information.

We are also unable to believe easily that microcosms and macrocosms are “species”. Yet an organic perception of macrocosms like galaxies or planets, and an organic perception of microcosms such as cells and atoms, is the most logical way of “unifying” our understanding of the entities of the Universe. We might see those herds very close together in which case we talk of bodies, or we might see them extended with a loose organization; then we talk of waves, societies or herds.

A verbal definition of supœrganisms 

A generic definition of an organism or ecosystem will help to clarify what we mean by a “vital universe”, composed of “universal organisms”. Let us take a template for a micro or macrocosmic organism (or ecosystem) that differs only in the specific st variety of motion, energy or information we put into brackets. “A universal microcosmic or macrocosmic organism or ecosystem is a population of [name a particular species], related by networks of entropy, [name a language or force] information and networks of [name a kind of energy]”. Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the universe:

Everything is encoded in those networks and its topologies which can be explained with multiple languages, the language of topology (mathematics), the language of logic (sequences of actions the networks cause), the language of social classes, as the 3 networks with its attached cells have a hierarchical order, with the informative nervous network in control of the faster languages on top (legal politicians and financial bankers in human societies, nervous cells and blood leukocytes in biologic organisms, gravitational black holes in galaxies, etc.).

There are 3 physiological networks in each supœrganism from the galaxy to the atom, the two scales where self-similarity takes place (the galatom smaller and larger planes).

Those 3 physiologic networks/classes/physical parts of ANY system of the Universe define the Universe as a fractal organism of infinite smaller and bigger super organisms, in a game of Russian dolls in which each of us is a ‘island-Universe’ within itself, made of smaller parts. For that reason each of us is also a part, cell/citizen of a social super organism, nation, religion or civilizations, which we do NOT see as a whole, as our cells do NOT see us as a whole, but DO exist as such. Let us then define the ‘stair of Universal supœrganisms to understand this:

Let us then define with similar templates the ‘stair of nested Universal supœrganisms, of the 3 stientific varieties – physical, biologic and social:

∆+3: A galactic organism is a population of stars, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of black holes & a membrane made of strangelet matter symmetric to:

∆-3: An atomic organism is a population of particles, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of quarks, and a membrane made of electronic matter symmetric to:

∆+2: A star is a population of electronic plasma, related by energetic networks of electromagnetism and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of atoms, and a membrane of photonic radiation symmetric to:

∆-2: A light organism is a body of energetic waves over a quantum potential field of gravitational neutrinos, directed by its particle, informative photon state…

∆-1: A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal, nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey) coded by instincts.

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy, coded by human memes.

– A bio-economic organism, is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of monetary and electronic information, and networks of roads and electric energy.
The difference between both type of systems, a historic and an economic organism thus is clear when we consider that the ‘organic unit’ of the economic ecosystem is NOT contrary to belief a nation or civilization but a new organization, appeared recently with the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, called the company-’mother’ whose function is to reproduce a product, overwhelmingly a machine, and then to evolve further and adapt the world to the existence of those machines, creating networks of energy and information for them (digital networks, electric networks, etc.)

And this is the first big surprise of an organic model of history and economics: while History is undoubtedly the product of human endeavors, the economic ecosystem is ruled by company-mothers of machines, which follow a set of biological, evolutionary and organic laws independent of mankind; quite removed from the abstract jargon coined in the XVIII century, even before machines existed by classic economists’ like Mr. Adam Smith.

In the graphs above and below, the 2 super organisms growing on the Earth today, History the super organism of mankind and the metal-earth, the super organism of company-mothers.

It is obvious that in this planet there are cultures that are technological and love the evolution of metal and cultures that are of the tree of life. And this is the fundamental division we must make to understand the fractal division of mankind in quarreling civilizations.

Networks that share energy and information between parts and wholes express the structural unity of all scales connecting all systems of reality. Networks ‘fill’ space ad maximal to connect fully the whole with parts, which are similar, hence find efficient to come in parallel herds and share the same energy and form.

So an important concept is the difference between an ecosystem in which multiple supœrganisms co-exist, often in predatory relationships, vs. an organism in which only a type of atoms, cells or citizens co-exist, and is far more symbiotic as all parts love each other and share energy and information through its networks, over a common territorial space, as shown in the graph.

Historical societies as eco(nomic)systems of two species, company-mothers of machines/weapons and humans.

So what is wrong with human supœrganisms is obvious: unlike nature’s organisms, many cells of the human body do NOT receive enough oxygen-money to feed and survive, because the brain neuronal informative people-castes that reproduce money and legal information, through its informative, nervous political and economic, reproductive networks are often more like cancerous systems that suck in all the blood-money for themselves. Moreover, the body cells can send back through the nervous system pain messages to the neuronal cells so they serve them and don’t hurt the body cells, and finally the managerial neuronal class gets ad maximal only 10 times more energy than the body cells. So a non corrupted efficient political system would have a feed-back democratic pain= judgment vote. And as a blood system of red cells distributes the money-oxygen of society to all cells, reproduced in all bones – NOT monopolized by a ‘single class-organ’ a society should deliver a Universal salary for all humans/cells to buy or produce the welfare goods they need to survive. Without those 2 measures a system becomes corrupted and dies, because the body cells, the middle class is blind and gets information about the outer universe only from the neuronal class that controls information – today through audiovisual networks. So if the neuronal class is not supervised and judged and it monopolizes the issue of blood, it has absolute power on the cells, ab=using its body till the organism dies. So we live in a cancerous, parasitic system where the neuronal castes harm the body and do not receive a posteriori judgmental pain messages, as in earlier Greek democracies, which were efficient truly free systems where all politicians were voted a posteriori after tenure and could be jailed even killed if they did not fulfill their promises; reason why historic organisms die in wars and holocausts. Since organisms like history that do not obey those laws are killed for the whole Universe to remain ‘the most perfect of all worlds’ (Leibniz) reason why it has similar laws for all the surviving ones.

What makes the whole a whole? The answer is: the nervous, informative languages that communicate all the parts of the super organism and calculate within its logic syntax and selfish values, the actions and path of the future, the organism will follow to survive. So languages of information construct the organisms of the world.

Why informative languages command the whole: because they are faster in time, so they can synchronize the movements of all the parts; even if paradoxically its ‘bits’ of information are smaller.

This bring 2 key elements of the Universe, one objective – the METRIC laws that relate all those parts and networks according to its relative size in space and time speed of its cycles – and one subjective – the existence of a common program of survival that every language ‘encodes’ in its logic syntax, to make possible the system to survive, which is also Disomorphic, because all systems are made of the same spatial forms and temporal motions.

History in Scale: 2 Network Languages: Legal, Ethic Informative Words & Reproductive Money

In the graph we can see a historic super organism based in welfare, whealthy memes that allow humans to survive, belonging to the ‘ideal species’ that would be efficient, provide to the 100% and survive…

History is a super-organism made of human cells, extended over a geographical body of energy called Gaia, the vital-space or body, where historic, social organisms evolve. In that sense, a human and a social organism, a nation or a civilization, have in common the elements of all super-organisms:

  1. Cellular units. These are cells in a human body, citizens in a human society.

Networks of energy or vital space; provided by Gaia, a super-organism made of living beings, joined by a common network of visual information and networks of life energy, gathered around her ‘river veins’. Since Gaia is also the living organism that hosts the social organisms of Mankind.

  1. Networks=Languages of This is the nervous system that organizes cells in a body, or the verbal/visual information that organizes human societies through laws, ethics and art.
  2. Networks that reproduce energy and information. These are sexual systems in individuals; and economical networks that reproduce goods and cultural networks that define how humans reproduce in societies. This is the blood system in a human body and the economic networks of production & transport in a society that favor ‘WHealth’, that is, goods that satisfy the needs of the ‘3 physiological networks of life-existence that make us human beings, whose ‘proper frame of reference’ (left) is NOT based on financial values, manipulated by financial institutions and companies that set prices, but by ‘biological true values.’

So a human organism Is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of nervous information and energy (blood). And a supœrganism of history is a population of citizens, related by legal, cultural, informative and economic-energy networks ‘predating’ over a territorial geography, on the outer ‘membrane’ of planet Earth.

The graph shows the basic structure of the supœrganism of mankind and its ‘economic frame of reference’ that should value goods and control its production according to their biological utility to foster the drives of life of human beings, making us thrive as individual and species, We sum up the nature of History, the supœrganism of mankind, and how it should be designed according to the biological Whealth humans need to thrive and survive,

The same laws that apply to the study on how cells becomes wholes through its connection through physiological networks, of energy, reproduction and information, apply to the way humans are organized by energetic territories, economic, re=productive networks and informative, cultural, legal networks. So we can design a perfect supœrganism of Humanity just by imitating the laws of social systems, in nature, which do construct perfect supœrganisms all over the place where all cells receive enough energy and information to survive. As Humanity does not manage properly its social supœrganisms, they become ‘infected by lethal products, weapons and hate media which kills those social super organisms.

The supœrganism of history is Mankind, and it has as all supœrganisms 3 physiological networks, the Earth, our entropic territory of feeding and energy taking, processed by the economic system that reproduces goods, directed by the informative legal network or political system that structures it all.

We define the economic system and the supœrganism of history in as any other supœrganism of the Universe:

The science of economics as a true social science, is the science of the ‘re=productive, blood-like system’ of the organism of mankind in time, History, whose natural purpose would be to provide all human beings, citizens-cells of our supœrganism, with the goods they need to survive and repress as blood-systems do the lethal goods that harm our body (weapons) and minds (hate memes, racist cultural memeplexes, fiction thought that isolate us and create virtual ‘mad-minds’) etc.

We see the ternary network structure of the nested organisms of the fractal Universe as ¬Æ topological planes composed of ‘similar fractal points’ (atoms, cells, individuals) joined by 3 physiological lines=networks, whose 3 functions, distribution of locomotion, information and its ‘combined’ energy define the 3 conserved Dimotions of any system of the Universe. A final element though is needed to make sense of those supœrganisms, the still mind of information, mapping out the whole and controlling it to perform its Mandate of existence, Max. SxT (s=t), to survive, grow and multiply.

The 2 languages of history: Verbal, legal, ethic ‘nervous messages’ and ‘WHealthy money’.

So we arrive to the human social networks, which we anticipate are in the present form ‘completely corrupted’ by the existence of a parallel ‘economic ecosystem’ of lethal goods, weapons, and corrupted parasitic money. So it is difficult for the reader to understand how simple, easy, and efficient WAS in the past, before the age of Metal, in the Neolithic, or during the ages of social religions of love or could be in the future with a proper design of the social networks of money and law, a perfect supœrganism of history as efficient as those we just have described. In such supœrganism, there are exactly the same networks: Legal verbal just networks of bits of word information that shapes the informative and cultural systems of the wor(l)d. And a healthy form of money, delivered to each citizen cell as a Universal salary so humans have enough energy to survive and buy its natural welfare goods, which must be classified NOT by price but by its biological usefulness to mankind, reason why we give them positive and negative values in the ethonomic frame of reference, according to its use for the 3 organic parts of humanity at individual and social level.

Vital, topologic, physiological network laws are the most important to consider when studying History in Space, since History, the ∆+1 scale of supœrganisms of mankind follow all the exact laws of a lower organic plane – that of a biological organism, albeit, due to its ‘primitive’ degree of evolution is NOT a well designed organism, but one clearly ‘sick’, infected by ‘lethal goods’, with dysfunctional parasitic economic systems (as the language of reproduction of goods, money, is absorbed by a minimal number of people, or used to reproduce those lethal goods). And so the study of History as a supœrganism has 2 different parts:

– It can design a perfect, efficient supœrganism of History with the laws of vital topology just by imitating perfect efficient supœrganisms of Nature that are the majority of them – History is in fact an exception –a sick organism.

– On the other side, we can study our supœrganisms, as they have evolved in time, spotting their degrees of corruption and sickness of its 3 physiological systems, the life Earth, Gaia that sustains them; the economic and financial system that reproduces its goods, and the informative cultural and legal system that synchronizes its citizens cells. It is then when it will become evident what went wrong with ‘human’ history, one of many likely subspecies in the infinite fractal planets of the organic Universe that likely will not make it into the future…

So if you wonder what this huge upgrade of your consciousness about the Univers and yourself and History and its supœrganisms has to do with the world you live in, the answer is NOTHING. Because in the same manner scientists are ‘children of thought’ on their worldview of the Universe, with its mechanist models of static space dimensions and one single time motion, social scientists, politicians and economists have no idea of what is truly its role, but with ‘vengeance’, as they do NOT even want to learn it. They are mostly social parasites, who are out there in a brutish world of humans who behave as ‘animals’ that exist with its 5D¡, but have no idea why, what for.

The science of economics as a true social science, is the science that should manage and design  the ‘re= productive, blood-like system’ of the supœrganism of mankind in time, History, whose natural purpose should be to provide all human beings, citizens-cells of our supœrganism, with the goods they need to survive and repress as blood-systems do the lethal goods that harm our body (weapons) and minds (hate memes and fiction thought that isolate us and create virtual ‘mad-minds’). As those are the ± goals of all re=productive networks of Nature’s supœrganisms.

And so since mankind is a supœrganism, and its legal, nervous political network and re=productive blood economic network its physiological systems, politicians and economists as ‘doctors’ of history should imitate Nature in the design of such efficient supœrganism, which is extremely easy since in Nature no supœrganism leaves one of its citizens-cells without enough food and welfare goods they need to survive, no supœrganism allow lethal goods to reproduce within the body system, and no nervous system, emits unjust ‘legal messages’ which do not treat all cells as equals and synchronize its motions.

We explain those simple facts of nature, and the proper models of social sciences, in more detail in the graphs that draws the basic structure of the supœrganism of mankind, History, including an ‘economic frame of reference’ that value positive and negative goods,  according to their biological utility, as organisms do.

In such a frame of reference, negative goods like weapons will have negative values, subtract from the GDP and be forbidden, because their use harm people.

And so the nervous and leukocyte, blood system would forbid and control its production.

While on the positive side we put the goods that foster the drives of life of human beings, making us thrive as individual and species. So a healthy, wealthy society with an efficient re=productive system would overproduce those goods.

And this would be done simply with the same system that organisms use to kick out the production of the goods its cells require: through a ‘hormonal language’ of orders controlled by the legal/nervous system that defined what to produce and what to inhibit  and a common ‘energy language’, oxygen – money in the economic system, which is given to all cells to kick out their actions of consumption and production, within the restrictions of the legal nervous system.

So a healthy wealthy economic system would be similar to the social-democratic welfare economic systems of the European Union in the XX century or China, before both systems became corrupted and changed its economy to a model of massive reproduction of lethal goods, and lack of credit for its people, imitating the economic system of American capitalism, where a few parasitic private bankers choke their people of credit, welfare, healthy goods are chronically under produced and lethal goods are massively overproduced to control and harm its population, which the corrupted political system does NOT serve, as it happens in organisms, with their neuronal system that serves the body – because the cells of the body can harm with pain the mind if it does not serve them.

Once we understand at true science of economics we can have a perspective on what today passes as ‘economics’, which is not a science but a praxis of power of company-mothers and its owners, financiers”

The social sciences that take care of the physiological networks of mankind and its obvious ‘models’ are:

Socialist Economics. Since humans should be democratic and rule themselves and their languages of power, So money should be reproduced by a Universal salary and by governments to promote welfare goods, biological goods first, and only when those basic needs are covered, mechanisms selected in production according to utility

  • Humanist Politics: all humans equal, no weapons and borders, for murdering members of the same species
  • Organic Sciences that make man again the measure of all things, the most perfect super organism that we should cherish and imitate to build a perfect human world.

Social love Religions: which express the social mandate of evolve together as a single species.

The role of true social science, its politicians and economists in a natural, efficient supœrganism of history.

But humans express those goals of survival NOT through numbers but through ETHICS, the ‘beauty of the wor(l)d’. Languages have in its ‘memetic linguistics’ an intuitive understanding of survival – so evil is the anti-word of Live, and the life of mankind is the truth Bio-historians have to preserve.

Hence ‘social ethics of love’, and ‘ethic judgments’ DO feature as an essential stientific element of Bio-History. It also explains the importance of religion in History, ethics in politics and the fact that ECONOMICS was taught for long in the department of ethics and philosophy. Since its reproductive network MUST SERVE the welfare of the 90% of ‘working=reproductive human citizens-cells’, NOT only the 1% of financiers, the informative=neuronal people in control of its informative, financial, digital legal language. But economists have become corrupted and believe today its ‘damned lies and statistics’ – the ideology that financiers and people working for corporations developed in Imperial Britain, according to which what mattered were the profits of financiers and Corporations, regardless of its lethal consequences – which happen often in the form of war, as weapons are the most expensive, profitable product to sell, or through the ab=uses of parasitic money –tax, usury, debt, speculation, etc. All this in a healthy supœrganism of History ‘industrialists, scientists & financiers’ MUST respond to the welfare of society as their sciences belong to Bio-history – they are the specialized subdisciplines that take care of one of its 3 physiological networks. It also means that theoretical bio-historians and its most important practical branch in charge of its informative, nervous, legal system – politic(ian)s MUST ACT to control those other ‘digital, secondary systems and networks’ if they FAIL to provide welfare to the 90%; and they must USE if required the submissive, ‘defensive=white cell’ system of police and army to forbid the ‘germs=lethal goods’ and hate memes=idol-ogies that cause sicknesses of the human supœrganism. Those are the a priori basis of a true scientific understanding of social sciences, which clearly require a change of paradigm from its modern unethical, mechanical concept that treat mankind as an ‘object’ susceptible of analysis only with digital data.

We are made of topological spatial organisms that move in time, tracing worldcycles. So 3 Elements are essential to understand reality in 5D and its space-time organisms: Topologic S-pace, ∆-organic scales and Cyclic Time.

As we study temporal ages that evolve a system, from birth to extinction forming worldcycles in a different paper, let us keep considering the most important aspects of the entanglement of the other 2 formal elements, ‘vital spaces’ and ‘organic scales’ – namely its last ‘pentalogic view’: the mind of space, which is obviously geometry but of a higher kind that the one humans use, as it requires to include the 5D scalar structure of reality and hence correct, on the pattern started by the 5th non-Euclidean postulate the concept that a point has ‘no parts’. Since all points have parts through which infinite parallels can cross, becoming focuses of information – Minds, Leibnizian monads.

So we have to rewrite the postulates of geometry to expand the concept that ‘space’ as we ‘see’ it, is really a mental space, something Riemann and the development of phase spaces and digital thought has proved ad nauseam.

 

SS-THE MIND OF SPACE: NON-E GEOMETRY . NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY: FRACTAL POINTS

‘Every point is a world in itself.

The most beautiful generalization of those supœrganisms is their study with laws of Non-Euclidean geometry, where a point has volume and hence become one of the cellular units of those organisms. A group of points becomes then a wave or network, and 3 of those networks form a topological plane or vital organism. In this manner we unify biology and topology and define the most important of the new 5D sciences, topologic evolution.

We change the name of space to §paœ, to signify two new qualities of fractal space -to be made of multiple scalar planes, §, self-centered into a o-mind, which is the true creator of the concept of still space as a simultaneous mind mapping in any language of the information of the flow of time cycles that conforms the Universe. And as a consequence of those facts, space is organic, co-existing in a series of scalar planes which 5 Metric converts in ternary supœrganisms, œ (ab. for super organisms).

Space thus becomes §paœ when we ad its scalar, mental and organic properties to its mathematical ones.

Yet space is still in the linguistic world best described by Geometry. We must simply improve the postulates and axioms of ‘Non-Euclidean Geometry’, to describe better the vital topologic properties of spacetime beings, which we do on the post dedicated to non-Euclidean topology, from we extract this brief ‘abstract’ and graph, to fully grasp how a better Geometry can describe a better space:

The 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points: The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of social evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths. The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scalar planes of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points. Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe. It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scalar plane’.  So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scalar planes of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a final Non-E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross.

In the graph, the formal view of space and its 5 Ðimotions, provided by the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry…

Pentalogic derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all  is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scalar plane, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scalar plane or 4th dimension).

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a supœrganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

So we shall redefine the main branches of mathematics, starting by its most important, geometry and topology with 5 Postulates that relate to those 5 Ðimotions and will be the basis on the future for a more vital model of mathematical thought as mirror of reality. To that aim we redefine the 5 most important elements, axioms and postulates of Euclid in correspondence with those 5 Ðimotions, taking into account the ‘cyclical nature’ of reality that either after completing a ‘world cycle of five Ðimotions’.

1Ð-5Ð: So the first-fifth postulate defines a point as a mind of perception, akin to the first Ðimotion of being – to perceive; and the fifth-first postulate that defines a point as a world in itself, a supœrganism with its inner parts are the same. We just might consider that the point has evolved and grown to emerge from its minimal ¡-1 state in the first postulate – points with inner breath; into a full super organism, ¡º, living in the ¡+1 world, in the fifth postulate studied here.

2Ð: And it has done so through a process of locomotions and changes of waves and forces of communication with other points that define the second postulate – lines with inner breath…

3Ð: And then it has formed planes, defined as social networks that correspond to the third Ðimotion of energy and reproduction, becoming a super organism.

4Ð: According to the fourth postulate of congruence, which defines its relationships with other beings, based in his ‘angle of parallelism’, such as similar beings evolve socially together in groups, complementary ‘left-handed female/right-handed male’ beings come together in couples, and beings which are not equal neither complementary enter either in relationships of entropic perpendicularity, or ignore themselves if their worlds are ‘disconnected’. So the fourth postulate gives us the ‘¡logic rules’ of engagement between forms and particles.

And so we establish an immediate relationship between the fundamental concepts of geometry, the point, the line, the plane, and its congruence or dissimilarity, its relative parallelism and perpendicularity, and the 5 Ðimotions of existence, the point is the mind that perceives first, the first Ðimotion; the line is the point in motion, in cycloid patterns, or two points communicating with smaller ¡-1 parts, as in the Fermion<Boson>Fermion relationship of forces; the plane has ‘holes’, it is a network of reproduced points socially connected into the 3 different species of networks that make a super organism (informative, reproductive and entropic, digestive, moving networks), and all this is ¡logically established according to the relative dissimilarity or perpendicularity between the beings (entropic Ðimotion) or social parallelism that evolves the point into a supœrganism, a new whole (social Ðimotion).

Space: Topological ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’ (below for the human organism, a biological plant and a physical system, a galaxy). This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

|-limbs-fields-territories<Ø-re=productive bodywaves-workers>O-informative particles-heads-informative class

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.- Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3rd class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’.

The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

 

 

STIENTIFIC PLANES OF SPACE-TIME. DISOMORPHISMS. SCALAR BETWEEN BIO-TOPO-LOGIC SUPŒRGANISMS.

Another key ¬E postulate is the 3rd one that defines a topological organism as made of 3 ‘waves/networks’, no longer 3 abstract lines. Since it defines when those 3 networks are considered to ‘peer’ between scales, the structure of parts and wholes we have defined as a supœrganism, where each ‘fractal point’ has an inner structure of S<ST>T networks that control its ∆-1 parts but is itself just a part of a larger network in a larger world. Even if often as its image of the higher world becomes distorted by elliptic geometry (which hides most information) it does not know. Indeed the cell, the human citizen, the star ignores that above him there is a brain of information, a FMAster that uses informative machines to imprint its brain and its energy-money, or a black hole that will eat her up after it ends its spiral trip. This is the distortion of 5D geometry on the next graph. We see more information from below when paradoxically it is from above that we are truly controlled. So humans think genes and quantum numbers program the upper scales, (constructivism) but it is the membrain limits and larger Earth’s climatic cycles that define evolution.

∆±¡ Scalar Organic structures. The co-existence of 3 relative ‘∆±¡’ scales of 5D in all systems: the parts, the whole and the world in which the system exists. So physical systems have the quantum scale of its atomic parts; the thermodynamic scale of its molecular matter and the gravitational sale of the galactic world or celestial body in which they exist. And humans have the cellular parts, the organism and the social supœrganism and world they live in. Its justification is obvious. You can see anything in detail in its parts, and it will be in a larger whole, and a metaphysical question is to consider if those 5D scales are infinite (likely) or not (only those human perceive exist from atoms to galaxies). Which comes to this: is each atom a kind of galaxy of a hypo-Universe, and each galaxy a kind of atom of a hyperuniverse? In terms of history, it means we are ‘cellular citizens’ of larger national, cultural supœrganisms. It is the basis of the organic nature of reality as those 3 ‘scales’ co-exist together, so they form an organism which by definition is a system of co-existing scales related by ‘networks’ that exchange energy and information between them (waves in physics, physiological systems in biology; economic and cultural, legal networks in history).

The immense amount of ‘thoughts’ of God (: all the details buried are the ∞ sea of species made of 3 planes of space-time, would take an ‘encyclopedia galactica’ to describe, as only the whole holds all the information about itself). Yet amazingly enough the properties of all of them can be described with the laws of non-Euclidean geometry and the ‘complex’ pentalogic that make possible the co-existence of the species of those scales of space-time.

The graph of more than 20 years, which I soon converted in a painting ascending through the 5th dimension I carry with me everywhere in my wandering life of wonders, as Mr. Leonardo, the son of another notary with little interest for his work, lost in the western Mediterranean basin, did with his monalisa, perhaps in-loved as I am of the fractal Universe, resumes what is all about: The Universe is a, infinite, immortal, sentient, social, reproductive fractal; where the two arrows of absolute future, are exactly inverse to those ‘anthropic man’ recognizes, NOT TT-entropy and Ts-locomotion, but ST-reproduction of St-information that communicates and evolves SS-linguistic forms in a sentient complex reality.

It is essential for you to understand that the 3 scales of an organic co-existing system are completely different in language of thought (@-mind) as the larger is organic, the smaller is quantic, numerical and the middle one is e-motional, active, topology of exist¡ence, (S-pace), as the smaller one is hyperbolic, the middle one flat, and the upper one elliptic, in time ages, as the big lives longer, seems immortal to the fleeting small quanta, reproduced every day, synchronous though all of them to the beating time of its middle heart; and so we come in this manner to the entropy limits of death that the larger imposes on the smaller constrained to its territorial substance, crowed by clone brothers – but all laws are within the ¬Ælgebra of ∆-scales – the Holy of wholes.

Thus we set an absolute ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. dimotion) of spacetime. Because for a whole ∆+1 to exist, the parts ‘ilogically’ must come first; so social evolution and love between parts is the absolute arrow of future for the organic Universe, or ‘future’, while a form that repeats itself seems not to change, so the function of reproduction is the absolute arrow of present, leaving thus entropy= death, the dissolution of form as the inverse arrow of past. So we draw the 3 ‘dimotions of space-time’ in terms of the 3 time ages of absolute past (TT-entropy=death) and its relative lesser Ts- locomotion; ST-present reproduction, which is the function that maximizes SxT (s=t) exist¡ence in any scale of stience and the relative future of St-communication of information that evolves parts into larger social wholes, herds and supœrganisms; whereas the absolute future, SS, is the language of still minds, shared by all of them – the game of Generational Space-time we explain here and its two fundamental mirrors of space and time (mathematics and logic). It is an architectonical perfect Universe as long as you abandon the illusion of the ego that cuts-off man from its entanglement with the self-similar whole and all its parts. Why humans do not see reality like that, has to do with the mind function and its distorted self-centered view.

The metric function of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Sxð=k. Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

But as there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos.

According to the fractal, nested principle any larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the ∆±4 cosmos contains ∆±3 galaxies, which contain ∆±2 solar systems and planets, which contain ∆±1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human ∆º mind languages, contained on our brains. Thus bigger systems paradoxically are ‘supported’ by the smallest ones, in the same manner than within the nested planet, bigger mammals (whales) eat the smallest animals (Plancktons).

Since smaller systems run faster time cycles, and information is stored in the frequency and form of those clock cycles, 5D explains why information is stored in genes. They are smaller cyclical systems that store faster, more information. And it explains its interactions ‘up and down’ but not beyond; which means genetics codes biologic organisms, but NOT cultures. Instead, ideas of the mind, called memes code to history. So we have the basis of a scientific understanding of ideologies, cultures and how ideas spread like genes, reproduced in the mind of believers. In the graph we see such order of scales: each lower scale codes only the next scale with its information.

The most important supœrganism for mankind is the Earth –the first one studied, as Hutton, father of Geology invented the word supœrganism to qualify the slow cycles of Earth, which determines those of life in its surface. Then History, the supœrganism of mankind as a species, in time from the first ‘human cell’ to the last it will live.

So in 5D Stiences even species can be treated as supœrganisms where individuals are cells of a higher scale:

‘The laws of all scales of relative size in space and time and its supœrganisms and worldcycles are the same’. We shall develop a formalism we call ‘existential Logic’ (Ab. ¬Æ), with the symbols of the 5 space-time Dimensional motions to describe those laws and deduce the laws of all classic sciences from them. In between those scales, each one a different plane of space-time, ruled by 5D metrics (Time speed x Space size =Constant plane) there are ‘connections’, seen in space as ‘networks’ that ‘thin out’ as they branch till they connect both planes; something obvious on a physiological organism; but also through the impedance of waves and its geometric forms for physical systems with its dual, informative, gravitational and electromagnetic, energetic networks; and through the organic structure of financial=economic=blood like systems and legal=nervous=informative system for social systems. So we talk of the fifth dimension proper as the ‘fractal, wave like network,’ systems that communicate the different planes of similar 5D metric. All together they form a supœrganism we call reality. Let us introduce the main ‘stientific’ spaces, to concentrate in the 2 more related to the Universe: geometric & physical spaces.

THE MINDS OF THE UNIVERSE THAT PUT TOGETHER ALL THE ELEMENTS – ITS WILL OF EXISTENCE.

Finally we can consider the 5th postulate of Non-E that describe points as crossed by infinite parallels the mathematical definition of a mind: O-point x ∞ cycles = Constant world (0’ x ∞ = C). Whereas the infinitesimal singularity does not exist (reason why the big-bang is indeed false, the contraction of space ends in the relative 0’ of the galactic black hole axis that devolves faster than c entropy to the Universe, while time comes to zero, that is, the matter that enters the black hole becomes a still ‘pixel’ of its 5D image of the whole (Maldacena Conjecture) . So a mind is a non-Euclidean point crossed by a relative infinite number of parallels of information that form its world picture.

Its 2 languages and networks of informative bits & reproductive bites of energy.

Networks are NOT only abstract mathematical systems, but LOGIC, LINGUISTIC forms, whose INTERNAL, DYNAMIC nature explain the vital working of advanced organisms of maximal information – biological and Historic organisms. Both are ‘fractal systems’ self-similar to each other, , we shall call socio-biological organisms. A NETWORK, of informative nature, delivers messages of information to simultaneously coordinate the actions of all its parts; with its faster=smaller bits of information according to 5D metrics (min. spatial size x. max. temporal speed). While the networks of reproduction, the blood and financial system delivers larger bites of energy, which the organism needs to feed itself (when it is a healthy NON-corrupted supœrganism as most of Nature, but NOT human societies, whose astounding level of corruption we shall explain in detail).

The key to understand reality both in terms of energy but also in terms of information, as both are two sides of the same coin, called ‘exist¡ence’ is the fact that in the sentient Universe, each fractal point, atom, cell or citizen (physical, biologic or social systems) needs bits of in-form-ation, form, smaller in size of space, hence faster according to 5D metrics (SxT=C), but also ‘bites’ of entropic energy which will help the system to move. Networks are NOT some abstract ‘fractal tube’ but they exist to deliver ‘energy and information’ (SS: form=language with a little motion=St-information and motion=entropy=TT with a bit of information = energy=Ts).

So a healthy supœrganism will deliver to each ‘fractal point’ (molecules, cells, human citizens), two type of messages through two type of networks. We shall call ‘generically’ the 3 type of bits and bites of information and energy that each of those 3 physical, biological and social systems receive, ‘particles, genes and memes’ even if the words as usual in 5D sciences are slightly changed, and widened in its original meaning.

So with its specific variation, those are the two fundamental reproductive-‘body-wave’ and informative-‘particle-head’ bites of energy and bits of information of the fundamental systems of nature:

In physical systems, the two networks are the gravitational faster networks of information, which we humans do not perceive, as we are much larger beings with electronic networks. Its bits of information in this faster non-local network should be ‘gravitons’, components of gravitational waves. In physical papers we advance as the most likely particle state of those waves of information that ‘position’ the different physical systems of the galaxy, a gravitational tachyon ‘neutrino’ for multiple reasons, we study on our papers on physics.

On the other hand, because we do perceive it, it is much easier to prove that the energetic network of physical systems are electromagnetic waves, photons and its ‘social, static state’ as the elements of an electronic nebulae, trapped in the potential energy well of the atom. Thus photons and electrons become the ‘energy network of physical system, molecules. We shall escape then in this introduction further information on the scalar structure of those networks and how, as we ‘grow in scale’, what is a bite of slow energy for a smaller plane of space-time, becomes for the larger plane’s slower beings, a faster bit of information, in the amazing beauty of the harmonies between scales. So electronic food for atoms becomes electronic information for biological organisms and show on.

Those biological organisms have two fractal networks, the electronic, informative nervous system in which bits of electronic information moving along the myelin membrane deliver faster messages to every part of the organism to simultaneously synchronize its motions, so the body-cells act as a single form in simultaneous space.

– But when we move into the bites of energy delivered by the blood organism, the network delivers to each cell the basic ‘currency’ language of energy that all cells need to move, called ‘oxygen ‘. It is an atom of slower motion than the electrons but due to its electro-negativity and readily availability in the atmosphere, with its capacity to kick with two OH- & H+ legs the water ‘medium’ on which cells exist, the perfect language of ‘money’ for the organism to start kicking its ‘actions’.

So we DO have in the next scale according to the perfect laws of harmony, the two basic biological bits and bites of information and energy, electrons and oxygens, and from then on, as systems become more complex, variations of those bits and bites occur.

The main category are mixed ST messages, which deliver BOTH a stick and carrot ‘complex’ to the cells and its big molecules, which are amino acid systems, of great simplicity called Hormones, starting from the simplest of them all, an NO molecule (which do relax muscles, its main message to the locomotion system, increases the pressure of blood, provoking sexual erection, the simplest message to reproductive systems and multiplies the neuronal activity. As nitrogens are the clock atom of our mind-brains. So more complex NO systems with a body support of carbon chains become ‘hormones’ which might have a ‘higher informative message’ (with more N, as in nucleotide molecules) or a higher energetic message (as in acids with more oxygen).

They form the basic letters of the ‘biologic longer sentences that might accumulate information’ in ever more complex molecules, as biologic organisms are the more complex systems we know of. But they enter in a region of faster motion. So while Space ‘tends to remain constant’ in each scale thanks to filling networks, time accelerates. So the 5D metric refers NOT to the whole Universe of 5D planes but to a given family of ‘supœrganisms’ of which mankind in it 3 scales of ‘biologic cells’, human individuals and societies is undoubtedly a ‘phyla’. When we go down in scales, the Universe ‘enlarges’ for a traveler that becomes smaller and accelerates its temporal energy.

Mind and languages of communication: SS>St>ST:

Because the 5 dimotions of the Universe are entangled, a mind’s purpose is NOT only to perceive reality in the implosive process of ‘reduction’ of the forces the mind absorbs – which externally might be seen as an explosion of TT-entropy, as what happens around a top quark black hole till only the bits of information remain, and so an ST form becomes split into SS and TT (Universe and entropy paper), leaving the §till (ab. SS) parts for the top quark black hole or nova to form, while the rest is expel as entropic energy (E-mc2), but the mind must communicate St-messages to his territory of order to conform the world in which its mirror is projected. And so besides perception, the second great field of inquire about the Minds of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:

In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:

– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its SS-language.

– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘TT-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills.

THE TOPOLOGY OF LANGUAGES AND MINDS THAT MIRROR THE UNIVERSE.UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR

This said an important element of the mind of the Universe is its Universal grammar. How a language carries information, which surprisingly happens in all systems in a similar fashion, given the fact that languages after all code the 5 dimotions=actions of existence of all organisms – its ‘sT-locomotion’, TT-entropy, ST- Reproduction, St-information and SS-density of information or mind-mirror. The laws of linguistics thus become laws of a Universal grammar that codes the creation of supœrganisms by controlling waves of similar forms with a ‘grammar’ that is also ternary in structural scales, from ‘phonemes’ that range around the 101-2 level of letters, and can be as little as 5 to code the 5 dimotions of reality, from 5 vowels in human languages, to 5 letters in genetic codes to 4 quantum numbers, or four type of chemical compounds, to more complex systems around the 10-100 scale, from 20 amino acids, to 80 atomic systems; to the next level of combination of words with those vowels, which range in the 103-4 scale. So we have around 2000 words in human languages, from a few thousands to 30.000 genes in the language of evolution of supœrganisms. It is not though the purpose of this paper to define the quantitative elements of languages. While the laws of the Universal grammar will be treated latter.

All systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: Si<=>Te.

Ternary Universal grammar expresses the Сmotions in verbal languages and human super organisms.

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its ∞ complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

What languages matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

Red colors (temporal entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (spatial  information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) Length (energetic motion)

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y

Forces:  Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy)

Yet the language of all languages is 5D and its ternary laws of time and space – a language which is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.

Descartes. 3 Systems elements.

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

Then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

Mental spaces as logic spaces.

How far can we take the concept of mental spaces as logic spaces based in a Universal Grammar? Much further than we think. Indeed, as we ‘escape’ our scale of perception, information dwindles from larger and smaller forms according to the Non-Euclidean elliptic and hyperbolic geometries different from the Cartesian 3 dimensions of relative height-information, length-motion and width-reproduction that we use to construct our mind. Dimensions of information about other scales with other dominant forces become ‘far away’ from our distance and yet we still perceive till arriving to the blind ∆±4 gravitational transversal waves between galaxies, beyond c-speed by definition unable to be perceived in our c-lower world. What then our mind system of electrons do perceive of all those limiting stars turning around galaxies and light waves? Plainly speaking and we will further elaborate in our papers on Universe and Mind and Physics and mind… ‘the game of existence’. Indeed, our mind perceives the essential parameters of a system, its space and time parameters to construct mental forms. So we need to bring the fundamental graph NOT a Cartesian one but a bell-curve like of the function of existence and its parameters, SxT, of existential momentum and force, which is the mental space most abstract of forms of far remoded scales.

The duality of graphs of waves of existence: Cyclical vs. lineal waves.

All this said it is obvious that we can represent in phase mental space, which ultimately are all the spaces of the Universe (see Universe in space), the cycle of existence either in cylical or lineal forms:

The equivalent graph in lineal time will give us a bell curve – the lineal version of a cyclical life-line: The speed of time/information changes during the ages of life, shaping a bell curve, such as the st-1 age is the fastest age of informative evolution, which diminishes in the young age to a halt, when the speed of cellular reproduction and energetic growth becomes maximal, both reach a steady state in the mature age, of SóT, rhythmic back and forth beats; and then in the 3rd age energy decelerates first and then information decelerates and collapses till death provokes a maximal explosion of information into energy. Those phases of different speeds of energy and information can be generalized to any system and event that will always go through 3 ages: an accelerated seminal and young age of increase of form and energy, a steady state of constant speed and a decelerated age till the system comes to a halt and the event dies away.

One of the key quantitative elements that connect the 4th and 3rd paradigm of metric measure is the fact that not only each species has a different rhythm of change and clock of time, but the same species changes its time rhythms and speeds through its 3 ages. This feature is fundamental to understand all processes that involve evolution, from the different masses of ‘gravitational vortices’ of information, ruled by the equation of a vortex (VtxRs=k in simplified notation; thus the closer to the center, the faster we rotate, the faster the frequency of information of the vortex and the shorter the space we need to close a frequency cycle), to the evolutionary process of information in this planet, which can be mapped out and its frequency shown to follow a logarithmic process of acceleration, which now reaches its zenith with the creation of informative machines. In that regard we can consider the following ‘speeds of time’ of any event or self-similar ternary topology of energetic youth/membrane, reproductive maturity and informative, 3rd age (hyperbolic center of a system):

-st-1: Seminal age: Informative evolution is maximal, since the system occupies minimal space (Black hole paradox: Min. Se=Max.Ti). It is the palingenetic age.

– Energetic Youth: Evolution of information decelerates after the ‘landing’ of the species in the higher St-plane. Now acceleration of energy takes place.

-Reproductive, mature, steady state: Both energy and information maintain a constant speed in St=Ts (ST) feedback cycles, which will last depending on the access of the event to new energy and directional information.

–  3rd age: Now both energy first and then information follow a decelerated process of collapse; first energy becomes exhausted and then…

Death: Information collapses, exploding into its st-1 scale of cellular energy in a relative zero time (the minimal unit of time of the st-scale). Death is the fastest motion of the Universe.

Recap. In physical terms the 3 ages of biological change can be considered the positive, accelerated youth, the reproductive, present age of constant speed, in which humans repeat themselves and the 3rd negative, decelerated age of temporal age, or 3rd age, which ends in death, when the balance of the Universe is restored.

In the graph, a classic, Taoist representation of the 3 ages of life and its inverse parameters of youth (max. energy) and old age (max Information) represented by the triads of the I Ching, and a modern graph of duality showing those parameters as a semi-cycle, which in certain simple beings like light are in fact both the ages of time of a physical wave and its form in space, as light quanta, h=exi, is indeed both our basic cycle of time and surface of energetic space of which all are made.

One of the oldest graphs from 92.c. ‘The error of Einstein’, pioneer book on 5D physics is the understanding of aGalaxy as a representation of the game of existence, and its deep metaphysical implications in terms of mental spaces, which summarizes in a huge metaphysical thought regarding the way a mind perceives a mental space:

Minds diminish the information they observe from reality as reality becomes further away in ∆ST distances (scale, form or motion), to a point in which they only perceive the purest forms of mental space, which are the waves of existence in cyclical form (our perception of the galaxy) or lineal form (our perception of the light of the quantum scale, or in scalar form (fractal perception of networks in hyperbolic space).

We resume in the graph, this key insight on the nature of space: we see a higher world as an elliptic curved geometry, a lower world as as a lineal entropic geometry and in between scales we see fractal hyperbolic networks, as those 3 ‘existential’ views are parallel to the roles we play for a larger system, for which we are ‘entropic cells’, the role a lower system plays for usl as it is our food-space and the game we play in between scales as we form social networks with similar beings. So the existential game becomes a game of survival by selecting information in the right form to the function the system plays in those 3 mental spaces. This is the ultimate meaning of vital geometry and as a secondary key outshoot of it we can find the paradoxes of perception of ages, scales and topologies.

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY MIND STIENCES: LANGUAGES & MENTAL MIRRORS. ITS EXISTENTIAL EQUATION

Look around you. All what you see is a form with motion. It might be at rest but it will be moving respect to another point of view (ab. Pov), which is moving but feels himself at rest. This is all the whys physicists so far have answered about motion.

All ‘moves’ and doesn’t move. If we call the state of motion entropy and the state of no-motion, form. And the combinations of motion and form, ‘momentum’, when taken step by step. Or when measured in a longer interval, ‘forms in action’ in-form-ations’ if the form dominates. Or ‘energetic motions’, if the entropy≈motion dominates.

And the whole process of the event we analyze from the initial state of form with no entropy=motion, through the motions of in-form-ation and energy, till its final state back to form, a worldcycle… We Do have all what we need to explain the rhythms, beats, and timespace events of the Universe. So if we put then in a series, it is easy to see the sequence of a worldcycle of ‘tao’, of timespace, of ‘exist¡ence’, of ‘science’:

Worldcycle: Form<Motion>Energy>Information>Form<motion… and then we restart again.

The reader might think such series are simple and inconsequential, but when we proper understand the rhythms of creation of minds-mirrors-forms, with it, the modes of creation of species, or the world cycle of life and death, departing of such simple game of 5 dimotions of time-space he might think otherwise – a seed of form, moves in entropic fashion and live through the rainbow of color-states of a world cycle of existence:

Indeed, this simple scheme will as we iterate and combine those elements into the myriad of sums and variations that web reality, explain all worldcycles of existence from the worldcycle of life and death, to the worldcycle of evolution of species…

In the graph we can see how all systems are born as a see of form, which emerges into a larger scale with maximal entropy-motion, then passes through an age of energy and reproduces, becoming informed till an old age of pure form when again becomes dissolved into an explosion of entropy and motion. In physics this simple scheme gives birth to the states of matter between plasma and nuclear death, in life to the states between the seminal seed that emerges as a child that lives three ages through an entropic youth, an energetic mature, reproductive age and a third age of information that explodes into entropic death, dissolving its structures. Societies suffer the same evolution departing from its founding seed, a memetic prophet and book of revelation, dying in the entropic death caused by the germs of history, weapons and wars… So indeed, all systems follow similar cycles because they are all made of relational space-time.

 

 

S=T: SPACE AS ENERGY, ITS DIFFERENCES WITH ENTROPY. UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS.

We return now to the S=T holographic principle we found in the analysis of relativity (S=T), to study why the dimensions of classic Euclidean space respond to the S=tall informative, vs. T=lineal motion duality, merged in the width dimension of ST energy – themes those studied in more depth in our papers on Non-E Geometry.

Spacetime exist in ∞ fractal vital energy closed paths… self-centered in a singularity ≈ active magnitude

In the previous graph we can also observe how space and time became lineal, when it was drawn in the graph of Cartesian Geometry by Galileo and others. It is necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical Cartesian artifact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar  (a. §) §paœ, and cyclical discontinuous time ‘lives… existences’ .

So as organic space-time beings co-existing in several scalar planes, we do change also the word science for STiece, stienœs that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric.

Absolute and relative timespace. Absolute timespace is the fifth dimension as wholes come after parts, evolution selects wholes and so the arrow of wholes dilates time adding ±scalar planes, as each whole will be ‘grounded’ on a smaller part. I.e. a bigger whole will feed in entropic smaller beings, whales in plankton, galaxies in light space-time, Universes in dark entropy… Below the arrows of relative time, as all life-existences are zero-sums which return to its origin.

In the next graph we show you those concepts visually so you can realize that all is made of cycles of time (seen as information in still relative no motion) and planes of space (seen as kinetic lineal momentum, in its relative motion):

In the graph, the bidimensional nature of space-time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of time-space in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the n-sphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particle-head on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.

The graph clarifies the meaning of time – a tall cycle or clock; information, and its equivalent perception as still; information.

It shows the meaning of a generic quanta of space, a flat plane with lineal momentum or kinetic energy which is the lineal motion of a plane of space.

Now, to fully grasp the different clocks of Nature, we need to dwell on the 3rd fundamental concept of the fractal universe, the fact the Universe is made of such relative scalar planes of space quanta and cyclical clocks, because it is a fractal, made of discontinuous pieces of space and cycles of time. Yet as we say we have the wonderful fact that Energy and information, the integral and still perception of all those quanta put together is conserved, to relate them all and ‘do mathematical physics’.

Why Energy works in all the scalar planes of size of the Universe? And yet it is so improperly defined, with so many ambiguous terms.

If you grasped those simple concepts, Ei =∑ TT x SS ‘void’ of any historic bias, we can get into the order of all of them, called the ‘5th dimension and streamline physics and biology, into a single science.

Since, Ei = ∑TT x SS, becomes the most general possible equation for all the fractal systems of energy and information that integrate all the vital spaces and time frequencies of all the systems of the Universe. This is what we call the ‘Metric’ equation of the 5th dimension.

And while Energy seems to be a concept applied to all realities we have also localized different ‘quanta of spatial lineal motions-distances’, and different clocks of time for those quanta.

Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles. How many more dimensions?

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Ts is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and St is a cycle of tall time.

Ts (length, width) ≈ St(height, frequency)

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allow the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional.

And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroid-limbs fields, hyperbolic waves-bodies and spherical heads-particles) and its 3 time motions-ages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3rd ages).

And then every 3 space-time symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5th dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scalar planes also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scalar plane with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity.

This resolves a fundamental conundrum of modern physics – why information is bidimensional: because it is the frequency and form of time cycles that are bidimensional, tall and with a bit rhythm, a dimension of motion.

So in the graph we can see the principle of the Holographic Universe, physicists are trying to define (10.000 papers only in the past decade about it) but have not yet grasped as they do NOT understand space, time, information and energy, (kinetic, potential, its integral, etc.).

We can then see that the holographic principle merely means that if you give to ‘time cycles’ the dimension of ‘height’, then you do have the 4 dimensions broken in 2 for spatial lineal, planar kinetic energy, width and length, and 2 for cyclical time clocks, beat, frequency-motion and height.

Alas, because only things with the same dimensions can transform into each other, now we can truly understand the holographic principle: Our 4 dimensional Universe is made of flat planes of spatial lineal kinetic energy, we shall call Ts and tall cyclical bits of information we shall call St. When they combine they create a being of space-time, in 4 dimensions.

In the right we see the simplest one, a light beam clearly made of a tall, informative, electric field, perpendicular to a magnetic, energetic magnetic field, reproducing along the length of its c-speed.

Below we see humans and machines, which do have lineal, energetic, planar limbs//bodies, or as in weapons, lineal systems of release of kinetic energy, and cyclical, informative, eyes, brains, heads particles that gauge and process logically or mathematically information.

Further below we  see how a black hole, the informative nucleus of the Galaxy, similar to the DNA-informative nucleus of a cell in a smaller scalar plane

It does have a tall high dimension and an enormous clock-like cyclical rhythm, the event horizon turning at c-speed. So if light is the quintessential plane of space, with both components but clearly dominant in flat, length, the black hole is the inverse, extreme case of an informative cyclical clock-like vortex of time.

The fact is the Universe is made of both lineal and cyclical motions, space and time, lineal and angular momentum, quanta of space and time clocks.

And the Universe is made of informative mass vortices, with gravitational information, as the galaxy we are in, reason why we are informative beings. Yet between galaxies, there are fractal planes of flat space with dark energy similar to the expansive entropy of gases. And both balance each other in the fractal universe.

Now because physicists; do not understand or accept despite amazing number of proofs, the fractal structure of the Universe, they do NOT realize that the expansive entropy of flat space between galaxies is balanced by the implosive conversion of that flat space into mass by cyclical clock-like tall vortices of information – black holes.

Thus the arrow of information or arrow of evolution increases the dimensions of tall information, and so life evolved from flat worms into tall informative humans. So it does space, which time bends into cyclical vortices of mass. Or as Einstein said ‘time curves space into mass’.

This is the Universe which Einstein said is ‘simple and not malicious’. And he put it in a simple equation E= M (c²), which explains how the Universe constantly transforms its kinetic energy/entropy (light, electromagnetic, thermal radiation) into informative masses, back and forth in big bangs and big crunches.

Now as always the simplest proofs of the bidimensionality of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, are mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. He fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X3+Y3≠ Z3, the famous Fermat Theorem. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) albeit without commutative properties. An interesting property for more advanced courses.

So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, -, – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, -, -, -, -, ….. , -.

Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.

Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal space-like. We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.

Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time with 2 states present waves balanced in S and t parameters and  Past-Ts>Future-St: Potential>particles.

Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wave-bodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4th dimension of motion:

∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers -> 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) -> 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form).

Space as expansive, decelerating entropic field-motion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.

WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.

But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Ts-fields/limbs <ST-body waves>St-Heads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.

Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensions-motions of time: past, present and future.

What is the difference between them? We shall soon get to it. But first we must resolve the implications of a time described as a cycle. First the obvious: if time is a cycle, there are infinite times, and what physicists call lineal time, absolute time, is as Leibniz, the philosopher said to Newton – well not to Newton, who would not receive him, but to Clarke, a ‘friend of a friend’ – is just the pegging together of all those finite time cycles.

Next, if time is a cycle – and here is where the insights of Einstein have its value – we can SEE time, as long as the cycle is fast enough to close in less time that the eye takes into seeing. So all ‘time cycles’ that close in less than the second the eye takes into make a ‘still picture’ of the Universe.

And this brings us the solution to the second Principle of Physics: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. The relativity of all motions, which can not be distinguished from stillness, when the cyclical motion is fast enough to seem a solid form in the case of closed time cycles, or when we are moving along the frame of reference of the other motion with the same ‘spatial lineal speed’.

So in the same manner that Mr. Einstein built his Relativity on the aforementioned principle, (only referred to lineal space, as he never understood cyclical time), we shall build a much more rich meaning for the Universe, on the aforementioned principle, based in the duality of cyclical time forms of information or time clocks in motion and lineal space forms or distances and line motions.

The reproduction of Motion dominates the perception of form. A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

The Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind things otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox. The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

The ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

Formal, topological definition of time-points: minds, and space-fields.

‘Each point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz

The true colossus of science are its philosophers NOT its physicists. Aristotle, Descartes & Leibniz thus form the triad of intuitive geniuses and western pioneers of ∆ST. Let us then translate their ‘monad-intutions’ in a formal topological definition:

“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of synchronous clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of simultaneous space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”

The absolute arrow of spacetime is the fifth dimension of world cycles that is end always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.

How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.

They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single point-quanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronized by it.

The mind of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. Such minds are connected through causal time quanta in to all its cellular beings through synchronicity.

On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its lower scalar plane that ‘entangles it’.

The 3 conserved quantities of physics equivalent to the 3 parts of the fractal point.

The reader MUST realize what we do here. We establish the homologies and disomorphisms between scales by streamlining classic concepts of 4D Stience; and hope future generations once the change of paradigm is established will publish clean-cut treatises starting with the 3±¡ dimotions of reality St-Ts-ST; TT v. SS. Let us then see the equivalence of the 3±¡ parts of a fractal point with the 3 main elements conserved in physics

Thus the 3 conserved quantities of physical systems are the 3 elements, St ó Ts = TS (dynamic view) or St x ts=TS (entangled view) of the 5D metric function of the 3 physical scales within the galaxy, whose metric, hxc=k sets the final limits of information (h) and motion-distance (C-speed) of the whole. All are relative ‘nested scales, ’ which change as we travel through them the parameter of time (frequency or duration), and entropic motions, giving us 3 constants of scale of space-time, h, m and T through which the actions of its systems are taking place.

Entropy=Energy=max. motion x Time frequency/duration become then two limiting barriers, which dissolve the information constant of the being if crossed, disordering and restarting the game with ‘fresh’ entropic motion between scales. So frequency from the quantum wave collapses into an ∆+1 particle of the next dimension, which emerges from the ‘undistinguishable’ use of the energy/entropy of the lower plane.

This implies a finite limit in each plane starting from a first universal constant in space (H-plank uncertainty, first wave frequency mass-particle), and a limiting frequency in time (i.e. beyond 10.000 degrees molecules become plasma and temperature leaves way to frequency; and vice versa, beyond certain frequency waves collapse into particles; again beyond certain mass ’frequency’ quarks collapse into heavy quarks and black holes), so near the limits of each nested dual plane, ∆±1 by an excess of energy or information, the system ‘decays or evolves and emerges into a higher ‘constant’ of an upper or lower plane, crossing a discontinuity that doesn’t conserve 1,2,3 D (momenta and energy) transferred between planes.

In graph we see those co-invariant 5D constants for the 3 main physical planes as a representation of its conserved energy, which the reader will observe is always equal to the product of a constant of space and a ‘clock of time frequency’ (temperature, frequency mass, where mass is a frequency of an accelerated vortex of space-time, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence; e=mc2+e=hƒ -> m = ƒ (h/c2).

Each 5D physical scale has a constant ratio between its ‘frequency=time parameters’ and entropic, energetic ones, which give the 3 fundamental constants of Scales in the Galaxy organism, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of Kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume: entropic content of its orbital sphere).

We add to the interaction of those 3 dimotions, angular, lineal momentum and energy, happening in a single plane of reality, 2 ∆±¡ Dimotions of entropy (social, scattering locomotion that dissolves the parts of the being) and its inverse social evolution of parts into wholes to get the functions of physics in its 3 scales.

What is then the relationship of 5D metrics with Relativity. Latter we will treat the case of Einstein’s relativity, which ultimately is an improvement on Galileo’s relativity function of space/time = Speed (V=s/t).

It is obvious that both must correspond and Galileo’s speed formula must represent the same than 5D metrics for a single plane of space-time, ∆ø, which therefore must be constant. So we write $ x ð = C (v). And indeed, this is the principle of lineal inertia, whereas the physical constant of a spacetime organism is its speed that doesn’t change unless a force acts upon it. What then about, $ x ð, why it differs from S/T? It does not. As ð is cyclical time, which in physics is measured by the frequency or angular momentum of a system. But Galileo used the concept of lineal time, the ‘larger measure of time, sum of multiple frequency steps.’ So since ƒ (ð)=1/T; substituting in 5D we obtain Galileo’s function of inertial speed for a single plane.

∆ST symbols for 3 conserved timespace topologies=functions=dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions, Ð) are:

T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. O; §ð): the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, a spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

S<T: Lineal Locomotions, (Ab. |; $T), which will move through its lineal limbs/fields the system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points… towards a…

S≈T: Fields of vital Energy (Ab. Ø): with its hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them, in the same manner Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D.

So conservation laws define the 3 quantities conserved as time ages, which in space appear as the 3 components of all ‘particles’ and ‘physical waves’: Lineal x Cyclical momentum = Present energy.

So when we put together those 3 elements into an ‘organic whole’ as in the right graph above, it is easy to see, they form a structure with a central active magnitude that commands the lineal motion of the system (Center of mass or charge), a clock-like membrane of cyclical motion, and a vital energy enclosed between both, which we can measure by its radius-width.

The 3 parts of any organism define also its mathematical unit, the fractal Non-Euclidean point with breath, as it fits multiple parallels, when we come closer to it and enlarge its perception at the proper scale of the fifth dimension in which it maximizes its existence.

But we must add to the 3 canonical dimensions of space in a single plane of reality, now gifted with motion, hence ‘dimensional motions’ or dimotions; the fractal structure of the Universe in scales, which means to add two new dimensions. The canonical dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) of entropic dissolution and death proper of classic physics – arrow of time, and the inverse dimensional motion of parts that become wholes, of social evolution, of growth of information, as those parts emerge into a whole. We shall call this Dimotion, the most important of the Universe, the dimotion of social evolution, of love. As all languages, mirrors of reality not only mathematics reflect the 3±¡ Topological Dimotions that make all its organic systems – the 3 ‘dimotions’ or topological varieties we observe in a single plane, which shape its organs – simplified in Euclidean mathematics, into height, the dimension of information (so all formal minds are on top of the system from heads to antennae, to particles in waves – photons, quantum realism); length, the dimension of locomotion, so faster systems are ‘lines’, planes and TGVs and light rays, and the dimension of iteration, reproduction; so body-waves have a width dimension.

While the other 2 dimotions of evolution of parts into whole ‘upwards’, (ab. ∆+1, SS) and the dimotion of dissolution of wholes into networks or entropy, (ab. ∆-1, TT) are also topological dimotions. Since in fact modern topology considers its ‘varieties of form’, networks of points, which are defined by its ‘adjacency’ and proximity. So truly the world is made of topological organisms

In the graph we see what we mean. In the 3 scales of physical systems what humans call energy is TT, pure time after through an entropic process of growth of disorder, the quanta of space populations of those scales, H-plancktons, K-Boltzs and C2 squares of light multiplied by its ‘frequency of populations’, have become erased into a ‘soup of energy-motions’, an entity of a higher ∆+1 scale uses for motion – electrons that absorb h-photons in e=hv (photoelectric effect from where Einstein deduced the equation); waves of heat humans use to power mechanical objects in ∆+1 and radiation humans extract from the conversion of mass into energy.

So the equations are obvious, and its equivalence also because the outcome is pure timeless time, time=motion with no form, then reformed by the electron, the mechanical object or the nuclear reactor into energy of work, which however is something else, no longer Tt but ts.

And so only in the state of TT all of them are comparable, but by no means identical. Mass is NOT energy but can be measured after we ‘blow it out of all its information into energy. And because as we said, a dying mass goes ½ up as information and ½ down as motion in our lower mechanical scale, in fact E=mc2 is halved into mv2/c when c2 becomes kinetic energy. All this becomes increasingly complex as the equations of physics that depart from those get increasingly complicated, so we can only attempt to make precise conceptualizations in the papers of mathematical physics when we write/post them. So far here we can just make some disordered insights on those equations trying to get you the ‘feeling’ of what is really going on – transformations that kill systems and extract a partial part of its content as entropic energy for humans to develop its work=reproduce things by imprinting the extracted motion with its mental forms.

On the other side though we always have two parameters, the ‘quanta of action’ or family of entities of the system, h, k, c2, which are bidimensional constant 5D metric St, sT, ST entities of those 3 scales, multiplied by a population that by virtue of the Si=Te equivalence humans measure as a time frequency for faster ∆-1 scales (quantum entities are seen so fast that are perceived as time worldcycles) and as solid form (mass) for larger ones. Each of those st constants and ƒ(ð) frequencies of populations are thus measure with different concepts as humans see each scale with distorted tools of measure. For example h is measured as angular momentum, St, k as entropy, sT, (which as von Neumann said to Shannon nobody understands) and c as speed, S(l)ð(ƒ); because the mind distorts the geometry of smaller scales as faster closed time cycles, the geometry of larger scales as lineal (so the earth seems flat not curved) and our intermediate scale provides us with thermal energy, so we ‘predate’ molecular heat into entropy.

Yet in the objective view of Universal physics, for each fundamental scale, there is just a constant of action multiplied by a ‘frequency of timespace population’ that is converted into entropic energy of pure time-motion that feeds in its equalized Tt form human thirst for a source of motion. So we kill the three fundamental vital constants=T.œs of Nature, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and C2 to feed our mechanisms and organisms.

Those Universal constants of reality are complex T.œs, combination of T and S, balanced by 3 5D Sub-Metric vital constants of a any system: S/T= Speed of Locomotion, which defines the limbs/fields of the system, SxT=Existential Momentum/force, which defines its body and T/S: Density of information, which defines its mental power, all maximized when Si=Te.

But the terminology of humind’s physics is ambivalent in its concepts and so it requires when dealing with each specific case on papers on physics, an in depth consideration. Some elements of that rewriting are:

– Time can be measured in ∆+1 with Duration, sum of ∆-1 frequency steps, a better measure. This distinction is not made and since t=1/ƒ(ð), confusions arise on those 3 ‘generic S/T, SxT and T/S’ vital constants.

We cannot deal in depth with all those equations, which we shall do in our 2nd paper on ‘human physics’ focused in thermodynamics, mechanics and the translation of mathematical physics. To notice then that in the 3±¡ planes of humind’s perception of physical systems the frequency of time is measured differently, as frequency of a wave in ¡-1 quantum physics, temperature vibration in ∆º thermodynamics and Mass, a vortex of accelerated information in ∆+1 mechanics. And as we change planes translations of those concepts are needed, since they slightly vary in meaning and dimensions, and a thorough redefinition of mass ‘seen as solid’ in our scale long overdue. This time concept is akin to information, St, stored in the frequency of cycles, NOT to TT-Time entropy which means inner and outer explosion=motion. And different from Energy which is ST, the balance of St-frequency/information and Ts-locomotion, momentum. MOST human measures called ‘energy’ are NOT about the 3rd Dimotion of energy, which ‘KEEPS its balance of form and motion’ but about entropic states of scattering form and expansive motion in spatial information. For example in E=mc2, a mass vortex of physical information is trans-formed into an entropic expansion of space, loosing its form. So we do NOT measure its energy but its entropy. Human Energy then works as a parameter of the entropic scattering motions due to the death or big-bang of a physical system, exploding its form. This again becomes the case for Heat, which measures the entropy=motion extracted from a thermodynamic ensemble, useful for man to be transformed into ‘real energy-ordered motion’ in its ∆+1 scale.

So the best way to go around would be to throw all definitions and start from scratch with St, Ts, TT, SS and ST dimotions; to avoid unending confusions. That’s what I do in my personal research but public texts try to convert old minds to new wording, so it is difficult because science has given up in verbal concepts and just care for the mathematical mirror regardless of understanding. So Time frequency in those equations is mediated by ƒ in E=Hƒ, T in E=knT and m in E=mv2/2; but as E sometimes mean entropy and sometimes energy, confusion happens. As energy is used often instead of momentum outside physics confusion happens. As there are so many different time versions, confusion happens from TT to St… which makes difficult to harmonize all jargons.

– Consider Space that has also so many meanings. On one hand is defined as a simultaneous mental still image of time motions. But on those equations it rather corresponds to a sum of quanta of a population of h ∆-1 plancktons, K-boltzs and c2 photons in E=mc2. And so we would have to explain why C2 is the unit of ‘light space’ the background of our world with long disquisitions made in our papers on math physics and algebra.

Spatial populations in that sense are often the ‘past-memorial’ residual persistent form left by a ‘dynamic time vibration’, reason why a Gaussian probabilistic curve becomes a population distribution and quantum can be cast in probabilities in time, and molecular quantum physics in statistical mechanics, as SóT.

Should we give up? I don’t because I am translating the clear St-TT-SS-sT-ST parameters. As the reader might try to do the inverse he might get lost.

Fact is only once we establish the meaning of the 5 Dimotions of reality we can ‘ascribe’ every parameter of science to one of those dimotions either in a ceteris paribus analysis as a partial space or time function or as a complex entangled space-time function in functions that describe a time-space being mutating its 5D metric through the 5 ‘graduations’ of motion and form, from entropy («, scattering motion, which is both motion internal and external to the being), locomotion, < (only external motion), reproduction, ≈, evolution, > (internal mostly with external shrinking) and linguistic seeding, », still perception in crystal and solid or mental states whereas an active magnitude creates from a field of motion a seed of form.

Only pure space=form and pure time=motion travel between 2 scales.

The conservation of the quantitative number of ‘energy’ used by physicists is equivalent to the conservation of a Volume of space-time. The volume of a single spacetime plane of the Universe is equivalent to the quantity of any other ∆-scale. And all of them therefore transfer constantly energy and information between them. Yet more exactly what is transferred is entropy or form; since when energy or information leave a given plane, it ‘strips’ off one of its two components. It is then important to understand the difference between TT-entropy and SS-eeds, which are not in the same plane of existence than Ts-locomotion and ST-energy. As energy is the parameter humans use between 2 scales. The difference will be essential as we advance the model and take on seriously the task of translating mathematical equations of physics with rigor.
Only entropy TT and pure form SS travels between scales. Ts, St and ST must leave behind one of the two elements to travel and that means either a ‘translation to other language’ or an extinction of the original form.

It is a fundamental law shunned off since the neutrino proved it: The neutrino is NOT perceivable in this scale, as it travels likely faster than light in the lower gravitational scale; but it took part of the ‘energy’ of our plane as motion – did it carry also its information, its spin? I am afraid not, but we put it there, even if spin=form is NOT always conserved. A question fundamental to understand the neutrino theory of light. But of course, as usually Physicists are only ‘a la par’ with mystiques to see and interpret the invisible signs of reality into ‘models that are seldom truth but never in doubt’ (Landau) as with big-bang theories. So while we have NEVER measure directly the spin of a neutrino, which we know for values of pure motion (momentum-energy), every physicist will claim that Cowan, Lederman, Goldhaber and a long line have measured it, just by balancing the invisible momentum because a priori they decided momentum is conserved traveling between scales – which they do not recognize anyway. Fact is the non-transference of ‘energy and information together’ between 2 scales as that is the definition of death. Point to argue here is if the Neutrino is in the light scale – is not, and so when a particle which is a scale above produces a neutrino is NOT producing either motion or spin=form. As motion evidently is carried by Neutrinos, or else they would not exist at all. What is missed is the form, which in all other systems of reality also disappears after you die. So there you have one of the most profound all encompassing laws of 5D.

So we show what happens in the paper of entropy and the Universe: a split of energy – in to form that goes one way through the height dimension of S-Information and normally scatters into death, while energy expands mostly as motion – entropy in the length dimension of ‘T-motion space’:

The explanation is intuitive. A system can still send a ‘wave’ of cellular forms of any kind of seed or mental image that helps to reconstruct its system after it travels through channels of communication, mostly as waves that combine motion and form – the quintessential form of energy, with the purpose of going faster according to 5D=SxT metric equations. So if we reduce the package to the essential information, we ensure the system transfers the message in a relative no-time quanta; but 2 scale beyond – that’s a long shot. That is the region of ‘food’ and food is memoriless. The amino acids don’t tell us where they came from, or else they would NOT be food for us to reconstruct our form. In the graphs the best known physical transitions beyond c in novas black holes and Einstein’s equations, where lineal time stops in black holes, so motion is not transferred or rather splits, with the black hole, a top quark or bcb star (according to size) taking the food, quarks and expelling our electromagnetic waste, perpendicularly reduce to pure TT-motion: vacuum space.

The metric functions of the 3 main planes of space-time of the galatom.

In physics we have 3 Energy equations. However the E of those equations is closer to entropy, as we measure the flow of motion/radiation humans will then ‘form’ into useful work-energy:

So if we just consider a general 5D metric for those 3 equations of physical scales such as E is for humans a function of entropy and pass frequency as a function of lineal time that give us a scalar constant, so we write:

Entropy (E) x Time Duration (1/ƒ) = Constant of motion of a given scale.

The connection between both concepts is subtle. And each case would require a deep analysis given the extension and complexity achieved in mathematical physics, which are the last papers I download – so much work so little time left… What we want to stress here is that form is only measured indirectly.

When we express the entropic energy without caring for its ‘informative details’, multiplied by its time duration, we ‘erase’ the constant of space-time into a flow of entropic motion humans can use. But if we keep the system entangled without loss of information as E = C2 x ƒ (ðime=cyclical time:ƒ); we can talk of the ‘inner energy’ of the system, E, as a ‘population sum’, of ‘space-time C2-beings’, as in a wave of light which is a sum of ƒ-Plancktons.

So the frequency measures according to S=T the population of plancktons packed in denser space (S-view) or moving faster (T-view), or being smaller which in 5D metrics, SxT=C, means also they are faster. But as the electronic mind ‘trans-forms’ time-motion into space-information the speed is irrelevant, in fact the brain distinguish the density of Spatial populations of information as ‘color’ . And the electron has entangled into a still state of form with the other electron (reason why C-speed is constant, regardless of the background speed of the larger Gravitational scale, as both atoms are in parallel speed when sharing information; as any system that talks. I.e. you walk at the same speed). This is the 5D view on special relativity speeds. And as usual in pentalogic all those truths carry a part of the whole possible view: T-speed, St-frequency, S=T entanglement, Ts, human perception of locomotion according to our scale that inputs gravitational motion (Einstein’s relativity calculus) and finally TT-entropy extracted from the photon wave.

So bearing in mind those subtle distinctions, 5D metric functions, E x T = C2 or E = C2 x ð, give us the 3 fundamental functions of mathematical physics regarding its 3 ‘scalar planes’ (graph). But c2 must be taken as quanta of still light rather than c-speed; as in an electron which is a nebulae of c2 still light spread in a bidimensional area, trapped in the potential well of the black hole proton within its ‘event horizon’, which is the electron border, in the disomorphic parallelism between the galaxy and the atom, where each still photon is a star of the electronic-galactic plane.

It is then when those ∆+1 c2 become equivalent to the h-plancktons of ∆-1, which are the spin values of the electron nebulae, while the ƒrequency in E=hƒ are akin to the mass frequencies in E=Mc2, reason why we can fusion both equations to give us for M-> ƒ (h/c2), whereas the compound universal constant h/c2 translates ∆-1 into ∆+1 parameters. But essentially both equations mean the same. C2 then becomes an entity of its own in Maxwell’s equations, as C2=1/µe=k/µ (omitting the π factor), whereas K is the curvature of the charge scale and µ the magnetic constant of vacuum. So we are expressing c2 in terms of the curvature of its space-time scale akin to the tension of a string, divided by its magnetic ‘density’, akin to the density of the string, which translates the speed of light to the classic formalism of the speed of a wave (tension/density). And again the details change with scale, dimensionality etc, but the concepts remain.

Energy thus for any Universal world, in its totality is the sum of all the volume of space-time of all the scales of the being, in its totality, which is also a composite product of its beats and bites, reason why we divide Energy in the mechanical scale into kinetic energy (Lineal) and O-positional energy. But then we must add the dual energies of the internal parts of the system. Energy thus can transfer between scales, but the true magic of the worldcycle is that on the long term it returns to the scale from where it departs, so the balance of total energy of each plane remains the same. It is then energy infinite in the Universe? It amounts to the question of the infinity of scales, which seems possible due to the parallelism between atoms and galaxies. Though it is possible to develop a metaphysic theory of perception that is circular.

We can easily deduce it, because we used a simple example of a vortex, which in an SHM gives birth when uncoiled to a wave whose energy is measured by the first of those E=Hƒ equations., in the simplest case of E=h ƒ, which is the uncoiled SHM motion of its 5D cyclical vortex view we observe immediately that the frequency has uncoiled the cyclical beats of existence of the being; and is the equivalent term to Energy, as H is constant. But in the vortex of existence we noticed that the two elements that grew in parallel were the ‘bits of existence’ or units of perceptive information and the ‘angular speed’ of the vortex, while it was preserved the ‘length travelled’, or ‘volume of space-time’ for 3 dimensions.

So the constants, H, and by extension to other scales, K and C; are the constants of each scale of the fifth dimension, those are the 3 ∆±¡ scalar constants of physics; and they allow a wide range of ‘equal lives’, which can be exhausted, ‘squeezed’ in very tiny instants of ‘intense bits’ (higher frequency, higher temperature, higher mass) or slower bits. But as the life of each species is the same, it also means what we see as a continuous particle is not, but the sum of discontinuous generations. I.e. the life of a photon is as fast as its worldcycle of existence (wave cycle), and the next wave cycle must be a new photon generation that lives traces its growth as a wave and reproduces in its locomotion, collapsing into a particle. So a sequential series of photon generations of much faster life happen for each E=Hƒ frequency. And obviously as time passes, the photon learns to live longer and elongates its wavelength towards red, but each wavelength is a life existence (in fact we consider 3 such a waves as 3 ages of decaying length; since 3 waves collapse in a particle).

So we write E(v) x 1/ƒ=T (lineal time= worldline) = H(k). That is, E(V) x T(Ro) = H(k), in terms of the equation of the vortex. Whereas the nebulous concept of Energy is rather secondary to the conserved quantities of Lineal and cyclical momentum, equivalent to the radius bites and frequency bits of each scale.

Energy as we consider it is then a combination of those two essential |-momentum x O-momentum = Ø –constant of scale, topologic conserved elements. And the E in those equations as we said is rather the kinetic, lineal energy/entropy humans capture to give it latter form. In existential terms what is conserved are the 3 ∆-scalar fundamental constants of the quantum scale of frequencies, the thermodynamic scale of temperatures and the cosmological scale of masses, the 3 representing the ‘speed of the bits of information=perception’ closed when the vibration of frequency, temperature and cyclical mass returns to the SMH original point.

We can write those equations then either in terms of frequency or time duration:

E(v,w) x T (duration) =Constant of scale (H, K, c) =E(v,w) / ð(ƒ)

The smaller being moves much faster, with ‘more energy’, processing information also much faster, with higher ‘frequency’. So he thinks he is much more smarter and powerful than the slow low density larger guy, but alas!, after its usual phyla/family total number of beats, ±1111 he collapses. And the bigger turtle finally arrives to the same point the smallish Achilles reached; see it dead and collapses too.

From those conserved elements, volume of space-time of scale (Universal constants of scale) and beats of existence, then by making different iterations and transformative combinations, we can extract the conserved quantities of physics, angular momentum, closer to the frequency beats, and lineal momentum and kinetic energy, closer to the concept of energy, lineal speed and entropic motion. It really doesn’t matter they are not exactly equivalent, as long we understand them in terms of the fundamental principles the Universe conserves, ‘scale volumes’ and ‘beats’ of existence. Humans for historic reasons, have chosen slightly different physical quantities, and made of energy a word for many different states of reality, and they are not going to change ever those routines before its beats of existence as a species, now closer to conclusion end. It is worth though to see them from the higher perspective of 5D and its conserved quantities, $ x ð = K.

So the fundamental elements of those scales are the h, k, C constants of the 3 physical scales; which are dimotional ratios between the frequency of informative time cycles or a spatial population (T =S duality) of an entity, which can be seen also as a quantitative number of energy, related to the frequency of motion (lineal kinetic energy) or in terms of spatial storage/population (potential energy), also in its T=S duality.

But we know there are different ‘families’ of species with different ‘existential momentum’ as we saw in the different metabolic rate of hot mammals and low temperature animals. Those families however are a few, and can all be classified as relative multiples of the constants of scale, H, K, c within a limited range, for the reasons explained in the next paragraph, essentially the need for existence in a range of balance in S=T.

To understand this as usual is best to consider first the case better observed for being closer to humans – thermodynamic species. Of them, there are basic 3, gas, liquid and solid. Gas having more freedom and less density has a relative heat capacity of 3/2 KT by particle, which increases in different families of ‘tighter, denser social organisms’, as we move to diatomic molecules, to the maximal energy capacity of crystal solids, with more modes of vibration, rotation and translation; that is a richer number of Dimotions, not only lineal locomotion as gas is, but social states, organic dances. This leads basically to the simultaneity of monologic, dilogic, trilogic tetralogic and pentalogic states, and beyond to what would be the maximal possible number of simultaneous states (dodecaplex systems, 120 simultaneous particles, states in complex mass systems).

Because the reader has a ‘physical view of reality’, and after all is a human being with very few mind states, is difficult to capture the essence of this. Energy is the spatial view of the maximal number of states of existence happening in simultaneity, which grows with the complexity of the system and is maximal for mammals in life, for crystals in physics for quantum boson states in particles, where we notice readily the similarity of those ‘stairs of states’ in the different ‘spin numbers’ of particles and atoms, ½, 1, 3/2, 5/2 h, as we saw in molecules, 3/2 k, 5/2 K etc. Further on as we grow in ∆-scale; the next nested Universe is a ‘better family all together’ with more ‘dimensional motions’ in simultaneity, to ‘encircle’ the previous scale. So the number of h-states in particles is smaller than the number of K-states in molecules, which in the peculiar confusing language developed by huminds is a measure of growing ‘entropy’. Families of states though, as we said tend to be the 3 canonical trinity of ‘young gaseous, liquid, S=T, and solid Max. S x Min. T’, and so when we go to ‘families of masses’, there are 3 families of quarks, the holders of mass (that is, the inner nested ∆-3 nucleus, whose spins have negative beta temperature and his outer co-existing membrain encloses molecules).

It is in that sense absurd to talk of ‘frequency’ in the ‘scale of temperature’ and of ‘temperature’ in the scale of masses. As in the new scale those parameters would have to be considered inverse; something finally recognized with the adoption of the beta parameter of coldness, and its negative temperature when we move to the nested Universe of highly ordered spins from below or masses from above. As it should be absurd to talk of ‘spin’ when we move below the scale of light space-time, into the realm of neutrinos=gravitons, or of attractive gravitation in the outside scale of the hyper-universe, which is governed by the equivalent electromagnetic repulsion between galatoms. When we change between planes of existence, there is a social grouping of ‘frequencies’ from a time sequence to a ‘spatial simultaneous perception’ T>S, as it collapses into something else (Temperature); in the same manner that the orbital of its electrons that define single atomic form collapse into something else emerging as molecular motion; so from the frequency orbital numbers of quantum atoms we move the temperature vibrations of molecules; and from h-ratios of scale to k ratios of scale; and this again happen when we move to mass that has therefore ‘negative temperature’, as it orders thermodynamic into simultaneous wholes of the cosmological scale. And again, those are the 3 scales huminds perceive, as we are thermodynamic beings, which therefore only perceive the upper envelope of mass and the lower plane of quantum spins. Yet those 2 limits always create an interval. So as all supœrganisms of time-space co-exist in 3 scales, we have a thermodynamic world, between the outer gravitational ‘membrain-mind’ and the quantum reality, whose measures of timespace, are specific for each molecular supœrganism and sub-species sandwiched between the galaxy’s ‘lower’ informative h-time quanta and the larger lineal c-time rod of measure – the speed of light. We belong in between where all kind of supœrganisms that cannot go faster than light or process information in quanta smaller than an h-planckton have its specific thermodynamic time cycles, to synchronize our 3 sub-scales with ‘nitrogen’ clocks and 3 vital parts, in space which in the human case is the second ‘beat’ of the heart, length of the thought, glimpse of the eye, measure of a dual stœp, (and ½ second of it is indeed the musical beat that we find more harmonious to synchronize our dance). For all those beings then H and C are just ‘SS and TT’ limits. They cannot cross. Let us study them in more detail.

The regions of transition between scales. The ss & tt limits of each plane.

What means S=T? Obviously it maximizes the stœps, 5D SxT for parts of a whole volume of spacetime. So for each scale it means actually a better experience of life, closer to the ideal ‘frequency, temperature and mass of existence, because on the verges of each ‘discontinuous plane’, the function becomes asymptotic and finally breaks. Let us then consider those regions of transition because they are very important in physics and life existence, as they come to be the regions of death.

To define them we consider 3 Vital Constants of Action: S/T, T/S, Sxt, associated to the ratios between spatial information and temporal motion that we shall call, speed, density and existential momentum defined in its relative S=T by the larger world in which the being is inscribed. So the relative balance of the parameters of locomotion (sT), information (St) and its ratios (s/t, t/s, s xt), is established externally, for the internal system to absorb motion and form from the outer world, with minimal need for transformation. So most animals have the temperature of the ambient where they live; most eyes perceive frequencies in the range of maximal production of the sun they observe and so on.

In the graph we can see what we really mean by the loss of form or motion as we pass two scales. In the next scale we still perceive both, albeit reducing motion when going upwards as the forms enlarge and so relatively speaking our motion is for them ‘peanuts’. A fast moving atom can hit you but it is not transferring to you in terms of your relative speed (that has changed as 5D metric changed), much of it. A seed however can start a reproductive wave and emerge in a larger scale as a whole. Going down we can thus send a full seed for seminal growth. But as you see in the graph, both functions are asymptotic and in fact in the limit with the 2nd scale transition they DO NOT cross, but become infinite. This is the meaning of so many asymptotic equations of science including those of relativity:

While systems that have a range far away from the ecosystem in which they exist fail in balance and die. So S=T, is actually s¡-1=S¡ and T¡-1=T.

Internally though we can consider the entity as a world in itself with two maximal limits of form (old age) and motion (young age), and so within that world the function of existence, then develops in 3 phases, of max. E, youth-past-gaseous-entropic state, max. i, future, old-informative-solid state/age, and. Max. E x I (e=i), a balanced liquid state steady form a world cycle.

We can then make a graph of two inverse ‘hyperbolic curves’ which become the limits of the world in terms of motion and form, the system cannot cross without ‘dying’ as its informative particle/head and motion limbs/fields split. And this is the true meaning of the Lorentz transformations, as the system cannot cross the c-speed in the mechanical, and the 0 Tº limit as the system cannot cross the 0 temperature of pure form in the molecular thermodynamic scale. As we exist in between in physical terms (we are internally thermodynamic beings) and externally mechanical beings. But of course for humans the limits for survival are much more restricted, around 308-318º and 40 km of relative motion to our background world.

So in Lorentz graphs as we come to the c-limit we get an asymptotic curve; and the same happens when we move towards 0 K – the quantity of energy-mass needed to cross the barrier grows and kills the system. But that doesn’t mean there is nothing on the other side; just a different reality, NOT our molecular, mechanical beings. So today physicists use the 1/kT= ß factor of coldness to represent ‘negative temperatures’ of higher order in the particle world of spin energies, where temperature really is meaningless as we talk of frequency of angular momentum (spin). And we should also talk of negative mass and v>C in the world outside the galaxy of repulsive gravitation between galatoms, similar to a ¥-radiation world between atoms but in the hyperuniverse

RECAP. Once we have clarified why the Universe is immortal, it comes the fundamental question of conservation of its 3 5D parameters, ∆ST and its classic ones, time-energy, space-lineal momentum and ∆-scale=angular momentum. Though the equivalence between the 3 concepts are not absolute but rather follow the correspondence principle – as the 3 conserved quantities of physics, are ‘human distortions’ of the wider concepts of time, space and scale.

Since human physics is one of the many ‘stiences’ of the nested Universe, which studies the specific planes of matter, ∆≥|2|, with the restricted method of ‘huminds’ (ab. human minds) that due to the ‘egocy: ego=idiocy’ paradox deny organic and sentient properties to different atoms to those of man (ruled by nitrogen clocks and electronic spin perception) and accept only the language of sensorial machines, digital thought (a contradiction as humans perceive time with verbal wor(l)ds, not with numbers, argued on our papers on cultural evolution).

Entropy is motion=time=change. Information is form and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole. The proofs? Look around. All what you see are forms that occupy space and move in temporal energy. Everything is a space form with a time motion. There is nothing else. So all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms.

The principle of conservation of time has infinite variations. And we can deduce all laws of science of its existence, as ultimately what the other ‘element’ of reality, points-minds of fractal space try to do is to stop time, as an strategy to conserve it. As we consider a clear equivalence in physics between cyclical time and energy, the principle carries into two principles from where almost all the equations of physics can be derived. The principle of least time (origin of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations), according to which a particle will trace a motion that minimizes its time expenditure. And the principle of lesser energy, according to which any particle or physical system will seek its ground state of minimal energy.

Latter we shall see this principle of standing minimal points have its counterpoint In the second fundamental strategy of all systems, to conserve its time, or state of present which is the iterative reproduction of the system, which implies to absorb energy=time from other beings, to imprint it, once it is reduce to its formless state of entropic motion, with its own information. Thus besides the standing points of minimal energy that conserve time, which are the origin of seeds and still minds of information, of potential wells, and degenerate states of particles, of Lagrangians and Hamiltonians (where both minimal and maximal standing points happen) there is the principle of maximal reproduction, origin of the evolutionary struggle for existence.

The great advantage of understanding those principles in terms of its fundamental substances time=motion and its state of maximal conservation, space=stillness, is that they can be expressed in any language of thought, not only mathematics, and apply to all stiences, not only physics, which frees philosophy of science of the ‘gross’ errors of western human physicists that deformed time and reduced it to entropy and lineal motion, and its v=s/t equation, due to the worldly profession of its founding father, Galileo, artillery master of the Arsenal of Venice. So today when we study physics we go from simple exercises of ballistics, calculating the best angle of a cannonball to the entropic big-bang. Yet as physicists do not recognize those historic errors they have carried such simplified views of time and space into all sciences, a fact we shall not cease to repeat because it at the heart of our lack of understanding of reality in its ultimate principles.

Synchronicities of time between the 3 relative speeds in which a being co-exists become then one of the most fruitful fields of study, as the ‘persistence’ of supœrganisms in space is due to the symbiosis between its 3 scales of T.œs (time-space supœrganisms) synchronized with them.

∆-scales in physics. The little thingies and the big busting guy.

Reality is a scalar system of fractal organism of topological space and cyclical time, akin to the concepts of information and energy of physical sciences.

Each part of the fractal Universe is composed of smaller parts, but all are ruled in a given organic ‘domain’ which can be traced around 3 planes of space-time, ∆±1, by a set of metric equations, Si x Te= ∆º, self-centered in the plane we consider to be the commanding natural scale of the organism. What this means is that the lower plane will be time-like, with faster cyclical actions of hyperbolic nature and larger density of information; the upper plane will be space-like, with less information and slower cycles; and both will merge its spatial information and temporal energy into the intermediate ∆º state.

Those scales that concern physics are thus 2∆±¡ scales outside the human world/organism; the quantum scale and the cosmological scale, and…+ 3 ∆±1 scales that concern us, the scale of mechanics above, the electric scale of our mind-consciousness and the lower scale of thermodynamics.

All of them follow the paradoxical inversion laws of scales, the hierarchical laws of energy and the inverse laws of the arrow of information, Such as information increases in lower planes of maximal individual form and freedom and diminishes in larger scales of more continuous membrains and lesser freedom. So the larger membrain is curved, elliptic and traps the smaller scale, which is quantum, expressing all its potential futures in the short terms of its exist¡ences, but becomes bend and reduced in form and motion as it ascends and emerges into lower scales.

So we can study from the 3 points of view the structure of physical systems or any other system. Today is customary to ‘deduce the larger’ scales, as ‘limits’ (of lesser quantity of information) of the lower planes. So in professional books of physics, the first laws to be considered are those of lower planes, whose ‘limit’ as we loose information of the discrete, multiple free paths of its particles, emerges into a new scale…

But this does not mean we cannot establish from the top down a completely different form of organization that does work, exist and impose its laws of conservation of time-energy on the ‘feisty’, little thingies below by the harsh method of suppressing its energy and hence its information, with larger fields and longer time cycles.

Only that the LANGUAGE in which this other causal order is established is not that of the little thingies with its ‘social numbers’ of scale, and cyclical patterns of time, in hyperbolic networks, the but the brutish stick and carrot method which pedantic scholars so much despise and deny. The big guy with the big busting toy…

A few examples will suffice. The little thingies we call nitrolife species, busy busy radiating on the surface of Earth are brutalized by the big stick of magma veins of molted gold and iron surfacing in extinction periods, reinforced for good measure by a huge rock coming from sun-system sky, which might be ultimately the origin of those plumes of magma, as the body reacts to the ‘beating’ of the sun, sending a flow of vaporizing heat from its central heart, as blood flows on a body tumefaction by the hitting… And then we do have those harmful 11 years magnetic holes on the skin of the sun, tuned to the 11 years burping of the Sagittarius swarm of black holes. And so for this stick process of long time, simplifying control even if we can go down to the details, an organic view of Gaia, life, the Solar system and the galaxy does the explanation in system terms. The larger brutish plane of existence you might call GodoG, as used to do in my simplifying mystical texts is real, and as much as you little thingy would like to be so important and colonize with your microbial, faster plague the galaxy as nerdy NASA and Silicon Valley moguls pretend, hold your bollocks man cause you shall be evaporated soon unless you learn to respect the big guys of the galaxy, specifically in this DNAge the pretension of physicists to make baby holes on Earth.

Understand this. Respect the big guy and his stick because while his mind seems poorly endowed to you, he is a nested Universe with an equivalent ∆-¡ level more complex than your ∆-¡-x touch-base scale.

And so between the quantum mathematical complexity and the larger big busting sticks there is us, nitrolife of thermodynamic activity with electric minds, mechanically pegged to the membrain of mother Earth. And here we do have 3 scales at play, mechanical work, where energy-time of human nature was first defined, electrical flows in between and thermodynamic molecules on the lower heat.

Those are all the scales of matter that matter and we study in different papers. The one dedicated to the big guy stick organic description is thus paper on cosmology, focused on the organic properties physicists ignore, but to show that 5D does much more than that, the last paragraph r=evolves our mathematical understanding of the thermodynamic of black holes with proper explanation of Hawking’s formula, and before that we unify quantitatively the two scales of masses and charges.

It is all about time=space reproductive balances and stœps; and the equality of all exist¡ences.

In terms of relativity of existence it means each life-scale is the same. So we are not only out of the center of space (relativity) and time (Evolution) but also our scale matters nothing. A fact, which we can extend to other families of nature. So insects whose rate of thought processing is 10 times faster, reason why you can’t catch a fly, live up to 7 years (cockroaches ant-queens of ant-hill supœrganisms, dragon flies), while humans live up to 70… Which is also the number of rattles a car engine will experience before letting you down in the road to your wedding – the number of years light beats before blackening out back to the quantum ∆-4 potential scale blackening the horizon of the Universe, which egocy cosmologists think is the number of death for the whole Universe (big bang model).

The number of life thoughts any species in any scale of reality seems to follow, as the essential unity of all realities is the mind – and that, well is beyond the wildest dreams of our egocy science, even if we will explain also why minds ‘don’t share’ its sentient properties with other beings. So we shall advance the ultimate conclusion of all what we shall say here: ‘we are all thoughts of God, the mind of the Universe, its program of exist¡ence, the program of time dimotions – each of us a self-similar detail’ – a concept which Eastern cultures did quite understood but egocy western entropic ‘Neanderthal-like’ visual minds will always deny.

The metric that matters then is the ‘lifetime span’ of each family of species, most of them turning around the logarithmic ten scale, for mathematical reasons – as 3 is the trilogic of 3 scales, 3 time ages and 3 topologies that together entangle into 3×3+1=10, a whole new being of a higher plane. So 1010 is the ideal number of beats in time of a being, of populations in space, of scales of organization within those populations to form a new 1 of a larger scale of reality. Space tends to be filled in equal quantities in each scale, penetrated by networks that reduce its ‘time cycles’ (frequency growth of electromagnetic waves that travel through those scales in physical systems) or ‘branch in equal cross section cylindrical coordinates’ in biological physiological networks; but the time clocks of smaller scales are faster. So in fact to be precise what the 5D metric means is the ‘whole’ life of the being, which is shorter for the faster species. The true derived equality of the main 5D metric SxT=C is thus the third graph. The number of ‘time beats’ of any system in Nature from a whole phyla is equal, constant: ∑ð=C. There are then a huge range of quantitative equalities between the different st-dimotions based in synchronicities, simultaneities and specific variations for each species that earlier in my research I worked out enthusiastically; for a more systematic much larger volume on the fractal Universe and its time-space supœrganisms, we can’t carry out here. Consider for example that your weight in the ∆o scale N kilos, on the long Time duration of your classic Si=Te life equals the quantity of ATP mass of your ‘energy’ molecule for the metabolic rates of that graph to happen, every day, which is your daily ‘food intake’ as an animal (spoiled mankind having broken its prey in 3 meals with 3 courses for the whole 3×3=1).

We are not though here interested in the encyclopedia of quantitative 5D that will overwhelm researchers for decades to come, but in setting its fundamental ilogic, temporal and geometric, spatial principles.

Now, if you observe in the left side 5D metric of ‘metabolic sT rates’ of living organisms, they are shaped in families such as smaller systems have slower consumption of energy, so diversification of 5D metric by ‘phyla’ of Universal species does happen; and that is where we start the details, even if all entities will be enacting the 5 Dimotions of existence. And all will fluctuate closely around the fundamental decametric scales of 3×3+¡

The scaling laws of those graphs, we studied in more depth, in ¬Algebra, which are the detailed explanation of why they happen have a deeper reason beyond quantitative analysis, namely the existence of a 5th Dimension of space-time and a finality in the Universe, born out of simple logic – the need to reproduce=iterate reality so ‘the present’ continues in an immortal Universe, ultimate cause of those scalar laws, which are a law that transcend biological structures.

 

THE ¡LOGIC OF SPACE. FROM TRINITY TO PENTALOGIC

THE GENERATOR EQUATION

Lineal thinking is everywhere in science and the origin of so many errors in models using the same data than cyclical time that for decades I am simply amazed how this a priori limit of the mind makes people what Schopenhauer called a ‘stupid’ –“ a man who cannot understand the complex causality between events so he resorts to magic reason or simple causes.” I have experienced ST-upids all my life. The rise of consciousness from lineal single spacetime to a cyclical fractal spacetime is a huge leap of consciousness. But since as Descartes put it, in his introduction to the method, ‘every person thinks to be very intelligent, full of common sense’ if you try to upgrade its ‘consciousness’ on the first principles of reality people don’t take lightly. So you cannot show at face value its lineal ST-upidity.

The previous jump of consciousness took place in the Greek Age between ‘Semite mythic thinking’ about anthropomorphic Gods and a rational impersonal Universe of laws of science, which are nothing but the cyclical patterns that repeat causality between events. And people didn’t take it lightly. They poisoned to death Mr. Socrates that tried to free them of that fog of selfish myths. As we shall see in our analysis of History, that fog however returned to us with Abrahamic religions and classic economics – the work of biblical bigots who think bankers must have the right to issue the language of power of our societies, money in monopoly and use it as they fancy according to his go(l)d culture of supremacism above heavens, earth and the 99%. But if you tell them that they don’t take it lightly. They are ‘classic economists’ who know better. And big bang lineal timespace st-upid theorists who know better. So any contradiction of ethical or intellectual nature – the austericide of billions of humans living in permanent ‘anoxia’ for lack of credit, the blood-oxygen of the organism of history; the absurd contradictions of big-bang physics, is just ‘rejected’ with complicated ‘Ptolemaic epicycles that at the end seem to make sense of the movement of the planets from the false point of view of the Earth at its center’. Then when a new contradiction arouses you just trace another epicycle. ‘Simplify man, you are a marine’, says O. Stone in ‘4th of July’. This in science is called Occam’s razor.

But in science ‘Simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), because Occam’s razor is the law of truth in science. So when the Copernican R=evolution came with a simpler model, we knew it was truth even if at the beginning was less detailed that the many Ptolemaic ad hoc epicycles put to by the egocy theory of the human self-centered Universe (only when Kepler made the orbits slightly elliptic, it became more precise). This is obviously also the case of the bizarre big-bang, So now big-bang arguments to keep dogma are somehow ‘forbidden’. And this is the case of many models of science based in ‘lineal time’ – they are no longer discussed. A brief list: the lineal quantum Copenhagen interpretation clearly inferior to the organic entangled Universe proposed by Brogile and Bohm: ‘Physical review does NOT accept anymore articles on the ‘Foundations of quantum physics’. The lineal, manifest destiny of Economics and History through the progress of machines. The Saint Nobel of the Dynamite does NOT accept evolutionary theories in its prizes. The Darwinian view of evolution as the product only of the ‘struggle between species’ and its chaotic mutations without a plan. When we know the ‘best survival strategy is social evolution, so ants and humans are the most efficient organisms of History, and we observe genetic clocks with perfect rhythms of mutation. And above all the ‘idol-ogies’ – we don’t even call them ‘lineal sciences’ of power that govern the world. Nationalism, the belief people is not a single species but a tribal one that has to fight each other for the sake of the evolution of weapons; Capitalism, the belief a small group of people, the bankers, must monopolize the language of social power, money, instead of doing as all organisms do with its ‘oxygen-blood’, given to every cell to kick out the demand and production of welfare goods they need to survive, instead of living in a permanent state of anoxia (as money is the oxygen of a social organism).

But egoism, as we saw, in the equation of a self-centered man it is an ‘a priori’ condition of humans, who fogs its consciousness, as the Athenians couldn’t accept that their anthropomorphic Gods were an ego-trip of egocy (ego=idiocy), or believers in Abrahamic religions, and the chosen take very serious any criticism when you tell them perhaps all humans are equal and Palestinians should have the same rights as human beings. And Americans should have right to credit not only Wall Street and its cronies. The first group – physicists – simply won’t talk to you. The Second group will call you anti-$emite and of course as time goes by contradictions, poverty, catastrophes, and wars happen. History is full of egocy and human lineal thinking also. But and this is the extraordinary thing – everybody else who has been imprinted with the idea that ‘experts’ know better and humans are so intelligent will ‘swallow’ all those egocies without the slightest doubt. Let us then study those historic organisms, as we have studied the Universe in other papers, going a few scales from the galaxy to the surface of mother earth. But before we do so we need to learn 2 essential concepts of 5D cyclical, fractal space-time: how it forms supœrganisms, the fundamental particle of the Universe, and how those supœrganisms trace cycles of time –space existence between birth and death.

ENTANGLEMENT OF 5 DIMOTIONS: ¬∆@ST. ¡LOGIC EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

The 5 space-time dimotions in its smallest organic scale are ∆-1 finitesimal actions ¬ælgebra computes with derivatives. When those actions dominant in information add sequentially they trace the worldcycles of growing information of ∆º individual lives. Let us see them now from the ∆+1 p.o.v. of the world.

The purpose of Existential ¬Ælgebra is to study the multiple elements of our ‘5D metric functions of Absolute relativity’, Max. SxT (s=t), which we have broken down into 5 Dimotions: Pure Space-seed-minds of linguistic information (SS), Pure entropic time-motions (TT), and the 3 intermediate states/organs of St-information, Ts-locomotion and Si=Te reproductive states.

We are spacetime and so we share our properties with all other systems. Man then becomes again the model of all beings, as we expand our sentient vital properties to all systems of Nature, which will have a mind-point performing the 5 Dimotions of existence, fighting for survival, trying to maximize its reproduction in the Si=Te balanced point of iterative present, that seems not to change (often through gender mirror symmetry between S-females and T-males), against the entropic top predators that try to kill=stop its vital time actions/cycles and dissolve the information of its inner vital space, expanding it and disembodying the entity to feed in its parts, converted into ‘dust of space-time’ (ab. ¬∆@st) with the best strategy of social evolution into wholes to win that battle between all the @-mind self-centered monad-points. In this sentence, expressing ‘again’ the simple repetitive ‘existential game’ we all perform, we recognize 5 elements that from the larger perspective of the whole world will give us the ∆+1 view of the 5 Dimensional motions of exist¡ence, commanded by SS-linguistic minds, trying to avoid the limits of TT-entropic death by:

Performing Ts-Cyclical Time actions through its St-topologic vital space organs, enclosed within an ∆º membrain that divides the system into an inner, smaller ∆-1 scale of vital ST-work & information, protecting it from the larger ∆+1 world.

So in the largest view of the being interacting with many other beings in the world, we recognize 5 elements, Minds, entropic limits, temporal actions, vital spatial topologies and organic scales, which are completely entangled by the survival will of the mind that enacts the program of existence, into complex synchronicities of time actions, simultaneities of space organs, fractal similarities that allow symbiosis, co-existence and scalar emergence of new whole planes of existences, limited by all other wholes that imposes its entropic end.

So systems are made of 5 Dimotional ∆-1 actions->performed by ∆º organs-> that on the ∆+1 view become the 5 Elements that rise ¬∆@st of spacetime into ∞ interacting existences. Thus, we need a new entangled ‘pentalogic’ as those 5 actions=dimotions entangle into topological organs that communicate and interact with many other species, giving us the perception of a ‘continuum’ space & time of a single scale. Yet in detail all beings are made of ‘dust of space-time’, ¬∆@st, whose 5 elements define their existence and huminds unify at the largest scale of the ∆+1 world view, where each all those Dimotions and organs of all those T.œs (ab. Timespace supœrganism) simplify into the reduce continuum space-time world view of limited huminds:

S-paces‘, are all the ‘types of dimensional organic forms’, we find in all organic systems, which are ensembles of the 3 only ‘topological varieties’ that exist in 4 and 5D Universes. Those topologies perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information. Absolute space becomes then the sum of all the ‘vital organic spaces’ of all the fractal points of the Universe: S=∑s. Further on, as Euclid defined points with no breath, lines had no breath, and vital topologies loose one dimension of form. So the ‘tall and wide’ dimension of height of this page that holds information becomes the Euclidean height dimension of information; the flat cylindrical limbs/potential fields that move the being become the length dimension loosing also its motion and the hyperbolic body/wave width dimension that stores energy.

T-imes are all the types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads) that dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age), become reduced to a single sequential line of absolute time, T=∑ð, equalized further to the unit of human time measure, the second. As lineal time ‘eliminates’ the height dimension of information, the form and patterns of time cycles is lost. We thus regain as we did with vital spaces, the full complexity of the 5 dimotions of times. But true absolute time is the 4Dimotion of social ‘evolution’ that organizes parts, which hence must come first as relative entropic past of its future wholes. While the present of a function of exist¡ence is the more complex dimotions of Reproduction=iteration which seems not to change time, as a back and forth dimotion between the ∆-1 seeding plane and the ∆+1 world where the ∆º entity will emerge as a whole. And since the program of exist¡ence maximizes survival through reproduction it maximizes the present we all perceive.

∆-Scalar planes of space-time, as 3 scales are needed to form any super organism – the ∆-1 quantum, cellular, citizen scale in physic, biologic and social systems, the ∆º thermodynamic, organic social Planes and the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies and galaxies, ecosystems of Nature and Human civilizations; each of them ruled by the 2 metric 5D functions, S x ð (s=t) = C; whereas S means length or surface in space (or Volume depending on the ‘world we live in’) ð mean cyclical time (in static terms, Ti, time as information) whose speed= frequency is inverse to lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ. They are compressed in 4D models into a single space-time continuum, which creates the paradoxes of different properties of the quantum scale, which is hyperbolic for a larger observer (as it holds more information according to 5D, branching into apparent µ coordinates), and appears due to its faster time cycles as ‘probabilities’ instead of statistics in our thermodynamic scale vs. the lesser information we obtain from the cosmological scale, which appears then as ‘curved elliptic in its geometry – themes those treated extensively in our papers on 5D geometry

SS: @Mind. Or geometric ‘center of maximal internal communication that processes information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. There is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, which all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.

But egocy eliminates all the minds of the Universe, helped by Euclid’s definition of points with no breath. And since without ‘Maxwellian demons’, in-form-ative order and mental mirrors that project its scalar images of reality into its local territory, cannot exist, alas! Reductionism as usual becomes the perfect tool to prove the entropy-only universe in any grand theory of ænthropic huminds – so we reduce the cosmos to vacuum entropic space, eliminating galaxies, which are vortices of accelerated cyclical time, whose masses and charges in the cosmological and quantum scale carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles and balance the entropic expansion of space creating a static Universe. And we reduce the ‘organic wholes’ and systemic intelligence that makes possible the emergence of new planes of existence and evolve socially through the power of love – the sharing of energy and information between equal forms – so alas, Darwinism – ill understood as evolution is precisely of species, and its summit the organic evolution of herds into supœrganisms – becomes the chaotic dogma, when the ‘struggle for survival’ only studies the final entropic death of organisms, but what truly matters are the informative genetic clocks and how they develop through scales the ‘program of existence’ coding for the 5 Dimotions of all Natural systems:

TT: ¬Entropic limitscalled death in time, membranes in space: as systems loose control beyond two scalar Planes we define death with a simple function of dissolution of two Planes of information, ∆1«∆-1: 0Sx∞T-

Recap.  The equations of existence, ultimately derived of 5D metrics and its ‘3 standing points’ of the life-death cycle has an infinite number of perspectives – in fact it generates in each local system, its events and supœrganisms, and in languages, becomes the syntactic mirror of its structure. So for each experiment and equation, we can find a correspondence with the equation and its 5 elements: Max. S x Min. T (information), Max. T x Min. S (locomotion) S=T (reproduction), S-informative seed or mind in a lower ∆-1 scale and T, entropic dissolution in a larger ∆+1 world – the 2 limits of birth and extinction that frame all systems, and equations (initial conditions, etc.)

It follows that basically stience is the study of the function of exist¡ence of infinite beings, which could not be otherwise as if all what exists is space and time, that equation is the most synoptic view of reality. And so classic ¬Algebra is the mathematical analysis of that equation with classic 5D families of number and operands. But before we make them correspond with those 5 Dimotions, is worth to consider the larger field of Existential ¬Ælgebra that applies to all stiences.

Because the system is made of 5 Dimotional components, we need a new entangled ‘pentalogic’ as the 5 topologic Dimotions become organs that communicate and interact together. So we talk of all beings as made of ‘dust of space-time’, ¬∆@st, whose 5 elements define their existence:

So to acquire a full description of each of them, we must consider it from the perspective of the others, as in the ‘Rashomon effect’ (the film in which to get the full truth of an event 5 points of view were required).

I.e. we shall describe pi, and realize it has 5 different functions, as space defines a membrane for a vital disk-like organism which becomes its entropic limit, as a mind it leaves 3 apertures of π-3 diameters to let the center to perceive the outer space, as time defines a frequency cycle, it is the main ternary scale of the Universe. If you observe your hand its function is informative, forms things, but also helps locomotion in quadrupeds, provokes entropy in boxing, reproduces things in iterative factories and influences languages in the decametric scale. Pentalogic means all systems have 5 Functions to survive collaborating in the world in which they are part.

What is the difference between 5D ¬Algebra and classic ¬Algebra? 5D laws can enlighten the meaning of classic ¬Algebra and connect it with reality. But there is a different avenue we call Existential ¬Ælgebra that departs from the Metric equations of 5D to study in depth the different dimotions and sequences of time events according to the survival laws of species. It belongs fully to logic sciences but it does have clear connections with ¬Algebraic operands. So we introduce its basic laws as we use many of its equations in the explanations of experimental ¬Algebra and its applications to mathematical physics in the II Book of these series.

The program of existence is simple. Supœrganisms trace worldcycles of 3 ages of growing in-form-ation, since the program is rigged to kill you as you keep wanting more information till you exhaust the energy of your motion and since motion is the substance of reality, and space-form a Maya of still senses, the Universe never stops, so when you cannot move forwards you must die, explode back… into entropy and erase yourself.

Simultaneous Forms, Co-Existence Of Scales, Mental Spaces

In the previous graph, we see some of the key laws of the 3 parameters of reality, space, time and scale. Humans though base its models of reality in a single parameter, motion, synonymous of time, in its two degrees, external motion of a form that doesn’t change, ‘Ts’, and dual inner and outer motion, TT or entropy. And so they miss the interplay between both elements that defines the fractal generator equation of the Universe.

They also, obsessed by machines, systems of superior metal-atoms that enhance our capacity to manipulate motions and information, use a single language to extract data over the form and motion of beings, digital numbers, to the point they have abandoned their own verbal language, which expressed in logic terms of verbal past, present and future, the interplay of motion and form. This reduction of truth to a few parameters, languages and analysis though suffice in itself, because each mind selects information in a few sensorial languages that confuse with the whole reality. So the immense intelligence of the informative Universe is hidden in the immense amount of information our mechanical senses and digital languages do not perceive or model.

In that regard for a digital science the two ultimate causes of reality, spatial information and temporal motion as described here will seem imprecise. He will deny the synthesis we establish with them. He will seek refuge in the repetitive modes of handling information of the so-called scientific method that should be called mechanical method as it was born when Galileo substituted human time verbs for clocks and eyes for telescopes to measure space and time, starting to construct the ‘digital mind’ today carried further with computer clocks and electronic cameras. We are here dealing though with a new immense amount of information missed for centuries since humans abandoned the mind of mankind and its verbal and visual senses. It is a tragic outcome, as huminds do not even realize they are building a worldview that is not theirs as ‘enzymen’ catalyzing the evolution of machines. Here, again the paradox of the ego makes humans, increasingly devolved in mind and thought, automatons of its computer models of reality even to realize the ‘global lobotomy’ they have experienced.

So back to the first principles, 3 elements conform reality: Space=form; time=motion Time and the less understood of all, the fact that forms group into social networks that grow into new forms, which once they are in relative stillness to each other within its parts form a larger whole, ∆+1, an organic=scalar systems: ∆ST.

And so what the Universe does is to create forms in perpetual motion but in relative stillness to each other.

Form thus appears to be only the relative lack of motion between the parts of a whole, achieved with cyclical repetitive memorial motions – cyclical ‘time clocks’. And so all is ultimately motion but of two kinds: repetitive motion, which shapes forms and carries the information and intelligence of the Universe in the repetition=frequency and form of its cycles and lineal motion that does not repeat its paths and appears as translation. But for the few who have gone so far, it is time to put symbols and pretend to do maths, or else he will abandon this paper.

Time is more fundamental than space, a ‘dharma’, a ‘slice’, a ‘moment’, a ‘present’, a ‘quanta’ of time. So departing from the ‘Baconian principle of idols of the tribe’, we put their work at face value. To understand the whole we depart from pentalogic, the entangled structure of reality in which any element is defined in relationship to the other 4 or at least – if we ignore entropy-death, the final limits including it into the entropy of scale (its limits) of time (its death) and of space (its membrain) in 3 sub-sections. So we shall study Space in its definition, space in relationship to scale, space in relationship to time, and space in relationship to mind and then take a ‘discipline’ closely related to each of those entangled pentalogic analysis in depth.

The Universe is made of two parameters, space=form and time=motion. Look around you, all what you see is a composite of those elements, regardless of what topological shape you observe and which speed has its motion. It is obvious also by the Galilean paradox that we cannot distinguish motion from form. The Earth seems still but it is moving. Particles are circular motions but they seem forms. Thus S≈ T and vice versa.

The Universe thus is paradoxical which makes it more difficult for humans to grasp the complementary ‘messing’ of space=form and time=motion. This has made their definitions of both concepts blurred.

For most people space is a ‘volume’ but to measure a volume, the volume must have ‘walls’ – a membrane that encloses the volume, hence a ‘form’. And that form must be seen-measured ‘simultaneously’. So in relationship to Time, space is a ‘present state’. Time=motion thus is a more fundamental parameter as space in terms of time is a present slice, and we could consider the perception of form, subjective to the capacity of a mind to ‘map’ reality in its ‘still focus of perception to create an image’ of space. This brings an amazing insight: ‘space is mental space’, a Maya of the senses; a gathering of information, the form communicated by that volume we perceive, to be represented as an image in our electronic brain, in a physical crystal. Space is mind space and this took geometry when Riemann realized to a new height, still poorly understood.

Space though requires motion – a force that transmits intelligently the form we perceive to become. So space has a bit of motion, and thus we tend to write space as St; a form moving that we perceive, with a force that transfers its shape and reduces it to reach our mind. This gives us 3 ‘relative’ Spaces. The pure still form in the mind, SS. The communicative flow, or wave of forces, which transfers us the information, ST, and the being in motion we perceive sT. Thus as we divided Time in relative past, present and future we can divide Space in 3 dimensions – one related to length, sT locomotion, one to the wide reproduction of information, and finally one related to the Mind SS that sees, in height, as the high screen you are looking into. Those logic relationships between function and form, completely ignored by science are a prior laws of space and time, which 5D reveals and applies to any species of Space=form and time=motion, which then analytically become connected to 4D specific laws.

In that sense, pure space, pure form cannot be perceived because it does not communicate with the observer, reason why when we talk of space we tend to talk of in-form-ation, form in action, St; which is also the symbol for ‘locomotion’, a form in motion. Information is then the transmission of form through space.

And when it is absorbed by a mind or stored in a seed. It becomes SS. So we write information as a dynamic dual equation, St>SS, where > is a natural symbol for a T>S event, its inverse, S<T event is an expansion of motion and diminution of form and S≈T is an iteration of space-time. With those simple symbols: S-pace, T-ime, t>S information, s<T, locomotion and TT entropy, the Universe constructs its structures. They are the symbols of i-logic to which we must add O-cyclical motion/form, |, lineal motion/form and Ø-hyperbolic motion/form, the symbols of topology, which combine with time and space.

So we can see lineal, cyclical and hyperbolic spatial forms but also temporal motions, which ‘frozen’ by a slow mind perception will become forms. Hence the duality of S=T (Galilean paradox): for a fast thinking system, all will seem form, for a slow thinking system all will be motion.

Those simple elements give us however an enormous wealth of knowledge hidden in reality which repeats in all scale and species.

In the previous graph we see the commonest of all those series: SS –St-Ts-ST…TT (not in the graph as entropy has no spatial form). It is the commonest of all series, a worldcycle of existence.

The repetition of those series in the life and death of any system of nature form a worldcycle of time, but in space they form an entangled simultaneous supœrganism. As we call each of those 5 combinations of form and motion, space-time by its functions, TT-entropy, Ts-locomotion, ST-iteration, St-information and SS-mental linguistic space, to which we add the sum of all the planes of space-time according to 5D metrics (Size in Space x Time speed of cycles = ∆= Constant) it is worth to consider the relationship of space with each of them.

THE GENERATOR EQUATION: ITS SPACE-TIME SYMMETRY

The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scalar planes of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scalar planes in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle.

Since for a Ðimotion to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its  constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scalar planes. The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum.

So we can define all systems as an ensemble of  lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through  3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronizes with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Ðimotional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death.

So we can define its 5Ðimotions in time through its worldcycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scalar plane in which it will act with its 3 Ðimotional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.

The multiple meanings of space.

It follows from the existence of 5Ðimotions that we can look at space from any of those 5 elements with special emphasis in the study of space from the perspective of the minds that create spaces (S@), and the simultaneous topologies that come together into the creation of ‘present’ space: S=ø=Ox|. So here is a brief account of the 5 points of view on space. S <≈> T: Space in its a(nti)symmetry IS form the opposite function of time=motion =change, which however converges with time motion to create bidimensional holographic elements of the 5D² T.œ,( timespaœrganism).

ð: Space in term of time ages is NEVER the future. It can be most considered within the fractal point-being its PAST-still, memorial content or generator seeding form or it can be viewed as the present simultaneous ensemble of the ternary parts of any being as observed from one external point of view: It is the memorial tail of a flow of time, which becomes increasingly static. It is the seed of information from where all comes. It is the synchronous instantaneous being.

∆: Space in scalar planes is related to the fourth dimension as entropy that expands ‘spatial vacuum’, and to the fifth dimension as a mental still mapping that gathers into a virtual space of the mind a finitesimal view of the whole often confused with the Universe itself (Paradox of the ego that sees its eye-space and thinks it sees reality). The mind space is infinitesimal, a o-1 image; the vacuum space is infinite, a 1-∞ word. Both are however mirrors of each other (Theory of Measure).

Science which is far less multidimensional however settles for the 1-∞ space. So space is defined as a lineal expansive, decelerating entropic motion, to which all material forms return, in the final relaxation of a big-bang death. Vacuum space is then the limit of perception of scalar planes of reality by any system; in our case gravitational space. Space is in that physical description formless, res extensa in words of Descartes. Exactly the opposite that mind-space, a finitesimal image full of form.

S:  Space in terms of Spatial information, is the reproduction of information along a motion path. Space then is limited in our light space-time Universe to c-speed of reproduction of information.

@: But of all definitions the true important one is the aforementioned Space as the mind’s still perception of all the cyclical time forms of the Universe.

Now, we have not even been exhaustive on the polidimensional elements that define space.

This fast Rashomon looking on space concepts shows how little is understood by present science.

Yet from Leibniz to Einstein a clear picture of space as ‘simultaneity’ appears good enough to mathematize space with quantitative ‘distance measures’.

To grasp space as a Maya of the senses, a mind image with a purpose, to ‘construct a mind mapping’ in stillness of the cycles of time of the Universe in the ‘form’ of in-form-ation, which helps the being to survive, we must backtrack to Buddhist philosophy and Eastern thought.

As such in the complex multi causal Universe space are many things and difficult to grasp for a human one-dimensional non-conceptual being, specially in this age of naive realism and picture taking as knowledge.

Yet the Universe is NOT as simplex as man is, and its scalar structure implies that ‘beings are many things at the same time’ have many roles depending on which ‘dimension of the being’, we explore and which external perspective or point of view we adopt.

We shall though in this introduction make only a trilogic of space, as space on space is redundant, and space and entropy is death, TT-dissolution of form, and we are not in the mood to write about it today.

Let us then start with the obvious, most important perspective of space as one of the 5 Ðimotions of time§pace, that of the stientific scales of the Universe.

An organic system is any cellular/atomic network joined by energy & information flows.

To clarify the meaning of an ‘organic system’ (expression preferred by the professionals of those disciplines to avoid anthropomorphic human ego-trips that deny living properties to all what is not like us): We do not refer as organic systems merely those systems which have reached the maximal evolution in its organic traits – the human mammal in our planet; but define an organic system as one which shows 3 fundamental features, we shall see are common to all systems of Nature (and we will fully explain through those texts):

  • ∆±1: To co-exist in 3 simultaneous scales of relative size and different time speeds, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic/individual and ∆+1 gravitational/ecosystemic/social levels (physical/ biological/social systems). This ‘fractal co-existence’ of different scales, which is mathematised by the metric equations of the 5th dimension is the key ‘organic’ structure of the fractal Universe. And it is the organic ‘knots and bolts’ essence of reality.
  • |xo=Ø: To have a symmetric, ternary structure in space, made of: 1) lineal, planar topologies, whose function is motion by absorbing energy (fields/limbs/territories), 2) hyperbolic body-waves-working class, which iterate the system’s parts and finally a 3) St, temporal, informative particle/head/linguistic upper class. This ternary system’s structure, is topological, responds to the only 3 topologic geometries of the universe, and puts together form and function, as lines are the fastest/shortest distance, hence limbs/fields move the system, spheres have the maximal volume of information in lesser space, so all informative systems are spherical, and hyperbolic forms combine both, so all iterative reproductive systems that combine energy and information, are hyperbolic.
  • Past x Present = Future: And to exist in 3 parallel time ages in which the system evolves from maximal young energetic limb/field activity, to a mature, reproductive age (so even al light ray reproduces another ray of light in the middle point of its wave, with maximal amplitude), and an informative, 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by the head/particle.

Hence the ∆ST logo of all this web. The universe is ‘scalar’, ∆, hence organic. It is spatial, mathematical, topological, S, hence organic as topology is geometry with motion, form with function and there are 3 parts, which we call Ts (for space-entropy) ST or EXI (a body wave combining energy and information) and St (a head/particle of temporal information).

And finally it is temporal, as those 3 forms have a function ordered causally, sequentially. So, we merely ‘change’ the order of the spatial elements to find its time symmetry: TS BECOMES PS (Ab. for PaSt), ST BECOMES preSenT, and St, temporal clocks of cyclical information become Ft, Future.

As Feynman puts it ‘formalisms’ and ‘terminology’ are important because they give us a synoptic understanding of scientific laws and events and systems. And so we do need to elaborate a simple terminology to formalise the laws of the Universe.

It is then obvious that all what exists does exist as an ∆ST, organic system. And all scientific knowledge can be embedded in that simple ternary template. It only remains to consider the most elusive, 10th element, Œ, the mind-knot or point of the system aware of the whole simultaneous existence of the being in space, which carries a simple program of survival through actions that absorb energy and information for the system and reproduces it with its body-wave. This elusive element, we shall find it, will be in the point of maximal communication of the system, mapping the whole in a simultaneous still mapping, and we shall study it in depth.

But for an external matter-of-fact description of systems as organic, it is not needed. We can externally as most sciences do observe all the properties of a being, and see they all fit on that simple scheme.

Those are precisions needed to fully grasp the biggest handicap for GST to become the ‘philosophy of science’ of the III millennium – namely the non-scientific but very real, anthropomorphic way in which humans define its position in the Universe, according to the very same structure of those minds, and its ‘equation of perception’, which puts man at the center of the Universe.

The equation of the mind is simple:

Œ-point (infinitesimal image) x∞ Universe of space-time cycles = Still constant mind-world.

We do not see the Universe but we make as Descartes rightly notice a world of linguistic images, self-centred in our point of view, much enlarged that far removed beings, which therefore seem to us irrelevant and inert.

The incapacity of human beings to see organic properties in all other beings of the Universe is an anthropomorphic feature of the limited information our mind receives of those scales, and the natural tendency of all minds of information to bias and distort information from its perspective, which makes our noise bigger than Andromeda. So humans have always have a hard time to give sentient informative properties even to the closest animal forms of life, let alone any ‘far away’, removed, hardly perceived physical form as the planet Gaia, or an ‘organic galaxy’, whose functions are so similar to those of a cell, might be.

And yet the father of geology did coin the word super organism to explain the Earth as such system.

 The generation of supœrganisms.

When we consider the fundamental symmetry of the Universe, we use often ternary symbols, ∆ for the scales of time-space, observed dynamically with special attention to the up and down Сmotions of information and entropy, the ∑ symbol for the differentiation of species, in ternary forms, the Ξ symbol for the planes of existence, the ternary § symbol for social planes, self-centered in the individual o, the Ω symbol with the 3 ages, dominated by the present central mature existence…

It is just a reflection of the peculiar structure of the Universe in ternary systems, departing from the duality of opposite ‘directions’ that split a ratio or universal constant or balanced fusion of those 2 previous forms. And indeed we shall see that the equation past-entropy x future-information = present co-existence is the ultimate bare bone process that create the present realities we constantly perceive, where only ‘those balanced forms emerge’.

But ultimately all those systems are ternary expressions of the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represents all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its space-time combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

Γ. Generator:  Toroid Ts(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ST(st) (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical St (head Particles)

Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

Or as Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So I could classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since it ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms.

Yet that is always a simultaneous organic construction, or rather superorganjc, as it is made of smaller beings which are also super organisms, controlled by the central point of view-network, the elliptic ‘sub-system’ of information that controls it all, in the 3 x 3 +0 decametric structure of all systems. So in the 10 sub-systems of the human super organism, it is the brain, the 10th element; in a 10 military system will be the sergeant, the captain, the general of each 10, 100, 1000 scalar levels. And in a simple tetratkys, similar to the billiard triangle, the central dark ball which coordinates all other balls, by being precisely in the middle, able to communicate with them all and organise the whole system.

Scales of the GENERATOR, Ts<ST>St: topological networks.

When we study the 3 topological forms of the Universe, we immediately confront the fact that a topological plane is made of points, joined by lines, and so enter into a more real description of the scalar universe as forms which are networks of points joined by flows of energy and information. The concept of an organism arouses immediately as an organism is a system that co-exists at least in two levels or scales of size, joined by networks=flows of energy and information.

3 canonical forms of space-time, sphere, toroid & fractal plane that in close analysis are always networks of points. Indeed, topology at professional level however is not a continuous geometry but a sum of points that put together at a distance seem to be not a network but a continuous form. Hence the existence of scales in the Universe, in which each point of a topological form is in itself a world in a lower scale. Since  the 3rd leg besides space-time symmetries of the GST philosophy of science is the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, and how those scales co-exist and create organic systems.

We can then recognise a ‘cellular-atomic-social’ system of fractal units that build a self-similar closed (spherical) open (hyperbolic) or toroid (with two closing paths), network as a series of cellular relationships of connectivity, adjacency, coherence, proximity, etc. which make ’emerge’ a whole that embodies the regularities of the myriad of infinite exchanges of energy and information between connected parts of the whole. In the graph we have drawn a few varieties of topological species, according to those properties, departing from the most stable dual, ‘simplex’ possible system of fractal points: 2 ternary ‘triangles’ of points, and its open-spatial and closed-temporal and open-closed space-time combinations, which illustrate the creative dynamic processes of evolution of space-time beings.

In the left, above time forms, starting with the ring of time and below, space forms, starting with the line of pure space, which are the 2 commonest, simplest s-t forms.

Yet the richness of functions and forms of the Universe is rather unlimited. So next we see a cyclic pentagon with a ‘lineal limb’, jetting on the base called a ‘mesh’, and next we see the ring converted into a star, where a central knot-point, the mind-monad receives information/energy from each corner of its bidimensional universe, ensuring a symmetric reception/mapping of its outer whole. And finally we see the 6 points connected internally and hence creating a new ∆-scale (that of the axons that come out of the neurons) and a new ‘mind-center’, in the central confluence of the points.

Below we see the commonest divergences from a pure line: a 6th element also jetting out of the line (a tree), and a connected ‘bus’, equivalent to the connected circle, where the conniption is established by a single line, which becomes the ‘spine’ of the lineal, entropic, fast-moving system, far simpler than the fully connected hexagon, since closed time systems are always more complex in information than faster, larger lineal spatial ones.

The organic, pentalogic Universe.

In such organic, complex real Universe causality for an entity to exist and last must be pentalogic considering first those 3 elements. i.e. you exist because you have 3 topologic parts, simultaneously working together, limbs, body and heads. So your causality in a single plane of spacetime is trilogic. But for you to exist you must have a smaller scale of cellular parts and be part of a larger world. So you have then besides your scale 2 more ‘causal reasons’, the parts and the outer world. And so your logic is at least pentalogic.

Pentalogic is the minimum analysis 5D stience uses to explain anything. Below that you are reducing reality.

So 5D stience uses the same data, but magically because the template that encases that data is far more complex and focused as an image of the underlying principles of reality, data fits, makes sense and its chaotic form acquires a deciphered order. So happens to the data of history that suddenly shows cyclical patterns, organizes humans in larger social units, predict the future of its economic and history cycles, finds a topological geometric structure in art and evolution and shows that ‘wholes’ from upper scales, the Earth as an organism, the subconscious collective Gods of history, influence its smaller parts. All this is strange to 4D stience, which is extremely limited by its postulates of lineal time, a single spacetime continuum and a mechanical automaton model of reality to make sense of all the data, which it extracts from organic systems performing actions with a survival purpose.

 

Space: Vital, 5D Organic Topology: The 3±¡ parts and networks of all space-time organisms.

Let us recap what we learned: we are made of 3 types of vital =moving space=form, provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: A 4 or 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which are similar to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy, but not quite… as it is impossible to translate the ‘game of existence’, into the limited understanding and terminology humans use to describe it, plagued with conceptual errors that limits our use of the correspondence principle. For that reason, after much time wasted in attempting translations we start from scratch with the concepts of TT-Ts-St-SS and ST dimotions and its topological, qualitative and organic translation. And only in the papers that deal with mathematical physics we shall attempt the more quantitative description

So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital space-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G:   |-Ts(limbs-fields)<Ø-Si=Te-Body-waves>O-St (particle-heads).

Whereas each of those systems can be understood as a network of similar ∆-1 cells joined together to shape the topology that best works for its time-motion=function. So the shortest motion is a line and limbs/fields that move us are lines, spherical informative networks become heads/particles and body-waves reproduce us.

It is then obvious all what we need is ‘pentalogic’, the study of 3 space-time networks, and its lower plane of ∆-1 parts and its larger plane of ∆+1 wholes and its ‘motions of entropy’ (TT), as wholes dissolves in their parts due to T1, internal and T2, external motions that ‘scatter’ its information; and the ‘motion’ of St-social evolution into wholes, as ‘Form’ stops the motion of each part synchronizing them will all other systems, evolving socially into a larger whole, where those 3 networks are also in relative synchrony with the others, thanks to a common language of information. Thus between SS-wholes or states of living information and TT-entropic death, the life death cycle happens. In the next graphic we see in space the structure of all those supœrganisms made of 3 networks and 3 scales that give us the ‘5 dimensional motions of the Universe’:

History is the supœrganism of mankind in time. It follows that mankind is the supœrganism of History in space. The vital space of mankind is the Earth. So geography has an essential role in History in Space. But as a supœrganism, mankind has a collective mind – the verbal, legal, ethic religious and social cultures of its ‘cellular citizens’, whose goal is to extend the ¬ entropic limits of survival of the human supœrganism, and cure its ‘memetic sicknesses’, with the laws and knowledge provided by the stience of Biohistory; as any Doctor will do with the science of medicine, which is NOT just a collection of arid data but a ‘praxis of welfare’.

And so since we are dealing with the same ‘species of supœrganisms’, that of human beings, albeit in a larger scale of the 5th dimension, the most important teaching of bio-history that changes the paradigm of social sciences, as taught today by mechanism is the fact that bio-historians are doctors of history, in charge of its ∆-scalar physiological networks, its blood-economic-reproductive system, its nervous-political-legal system and its vital space-ecological-geographical system.

Those are the 5 ¬∆@st elements of the supœrganism of History, ‘entropic limits of survival’, ‘scalar physiological networks, verbal mind, vital geographical spaces and temporal ages and organic cycles between birth and its potential death if those entropic limits are not extended curing the sicknesses of our physiological networks. So we study those the 5 elements in our 5 papers on the supœrganism of History, as we shall do, if the entropic limits of my life grant me time enough to do it, with all the main supœrganisms and scalar stiences of the Universe.

Thus we raise the logic consciousness of ‘huminds’ (ab. Human minds), both on the truths of History and the Universe, by upgrading their logic mind to a higher system of thought that the ‘damned lies and statistics’, placebo truths, lineal thoughts fictions and seflie, childish ego-trips, hidden agendas and wishful thinking that passes today as science… by at least giving him some basic ‘systems’ of inquire of truth. We explained the ABCD-E of the scientific method, which works for Disciplines at large. We want know to introduce a simple method of inquire that works for anything, even the smallest event in time, form in space or linguistic statement he might hear.

Pentalogic – also called the Rashomon effect – is simple and yet the most powerful ‘logic element of reality.

Because all what exists is made of a spatial form, of time-motions, spread in 3 scales of reality, its whole, ∆º embedded in a larger ∆+1 world, and made of ∆-1 ‘cellular’ parts, limited in time by its life-death cycle and in space by a membrain, where it sensorial mind-system that connects all those elements, exchanging energy and information with the outer world to enhance its survival chances, [laying what we call the ‘game of exist¡ence’, any event in time, form in space or ‘language-mirror’ that perceives them MUST have 5 Elements, 5 Causes, 5 Variations that we must observe and describe to obtain the whole truth of the issue.

In the entangled pentalogic Universe, it is not possible to separate the 5 elements of the supœrganism of History – its temporal ages, its ‘scalar’ structure divided in human citizen-cells, 3 physiological economic=reproductive ‘blood ‘networks, legal-informative and ‘territorial network of vital space’ or geography, its verbal mind and subconscious collective Gods and its ‘entropic limits’, in time and space, which if crossed will signify its extinction. As the 5 Dimensions of History work in symmetry like in any other complex ¬∆@st organism.

We shall use the pentalogic method constantly when an issue, form or event, or model/theory of reality comes up which is ‘confuse’, or a ‘newspeak’ or ‘disguise’ or selfish agenda, placebo truth or ‘camouflaged system’ to reveal out its full meaning. Reality is pentalogic means ‘the causes’ of reality are often 5. As a system that LOOSES any of those 5 elements does not exist for long. If you loose your skin you die. If you become static, motionless you are by definition death; if something tears into your vital space, you die. If any of the 3 scales where you exist, your cells, your physiological networks that put you together as a whole, or the world external to you, gets sick and unbalanced with you, you die. If an organism become mindless, unable to perform the 5 actions of survival – perceiving Information, to move in search of entropic food to feed and transform it into energy to reproduce its parts evolving with other similar individuals to become a stronger social whole, you die.

So pentalogic is everywhere and it allow us to find ‘faulty’ theories of reality, very common in science because human minds are monologic – so it is tiresome to observe unending arguments between childish scholars with ceteris paribus causes that want to raise with their egocy (ego=idiocy) to the only cause of reality. I.e. the entropic rock of the sky killed the Dinosaurs, said the physicist – not it was the competition of the Mammal, said the biologist; nay, the gymnosperm flowers, changed and he lost his food, say the botanist, both did contribute… acting on its 5 Dimensions of existence… i.e. mammals who had not attacked dinosaurs before started to eat their eggs, preventing its reproduction, as rats do with their biggest descendants, albatross; flora changed so herbivores couldn’t get their entropy; the sky darkened, so their body couldn’t get their sun energy; and yes the rock blew up their ∆+1 world… and so on. Of all those pentalogic structures of the living Universe, needless to say, the most important for each individual supœrganism is its program of survival or drives=dimensional motions of life (ab. Dimotions), that ensure its continuous existence.

 

SPACE ON PHYSICS.

Nature’s time clocks constantly accelerate into information and decelerate into energy.

Nature’s time clocks do vary their speed in different regions of space – the great discovery of relativity – which means each space-time being has a different time speed. But they also vary their speed as they trace a finite time cycle, either imploding an accelerating as a time vortex of increasing information: max. tif x min TT (informative time arrow of future), or decreasing in speed of time and increasing in space (max. TT x min. tif), creating an entropic arrow. A world cycle of existence is therefore the sum of all those changes in the arrows of time of a being, which ‘magically’ become ordered in 3 ages: Max. Ts (youth), ST (adult-reproductive age) and Max St (3rd age of information), which explodes back into entropy in the moment of death (St<<TT).

In the graph on the left the version of those ages in an information-energy scalar plane, in the center the first human observation of the process in scientific taoism, in the right, an informative time clock or vortex, V x R=k, which is the commonest manifestation in physical systems of the arrow of information, called ‘charges’ (∆-1 scalar plane) or masses (∆+1 scalar plane).

But we want to go a bit further and consider how the Universe does it; how it assemblies parts into wholes; how extends a form and expands it to ‘become’ a new whole departing from seminal parts.

We are made of vital space=energy, and temporal information, time-clocks that store the information, the form of the Universe in the frequency an form of its cycles. This is sooo evident, which first we must wonder how our nature as ‘beings that occupy a vital space’, whose motions and processes of time=change are finite in its world cycles between birth and extinction, which was fully understood in all perennial philosophies of the Universe and the common behaviour of people (as when we say I don’t have enough time and energy to do this), became forgotten.

Since, as yang-yin, space-time, energy-information beings, all similar words we soon will define with precision, the unity of it all, an our similarity as part of larger space-time beings, made of inner smaller cellular space-time beings, all our properties will soon be understood and seen as homologies of all other space-time beings.

But humans have for four hundred years forgotten this reality because when science started to facilitate measure physicists equalised all the time-clocks of nature to the beat of the mechanical time-clock, itself tuned to the human ‘time-clock’ of a second, which is the time-clock of our eye glimpses, thoughts, heart-beats and limb-steps.

Thus humans are one second frequency beings, and one meter (the average size of our spatial limbs-legs) space-beings. Our min thinks every second on the still mind-visual mapping the eye does, and moves the body with a second beat of the heart, to adequate the one meter per second steps of normal walking. But each other species of space-time will have a different size-space-rod of measure and time-beat-frequency. Reality is the tapestry of all those infinite time clocks and space-rods. THERE IS NOT an absolute background time-clock or space-rod, but ‘finite time clocks’ and ‘space-steps’ for each being (regardless of the more complex synchronicities an sequences established by the harmony between huge supœrganisms an its parts).

So where the cartesian absolute space-time graph, which Newton confused with an absolute Universal space-time graph, comes from? Exactly from the human mind-mirror of Mr. Descartes, which used it as an artefact to facilitate measures from the human point of view, our time-clock rhythm and size. But Descartes was very clear affirming this ‘euclidean, perpendicular’ space-time frame of reference was NOT the Universal space-time, but the ‘world-mind-mirror’ of man, our specific graph to measure space and time in a convenient form. As the word ‘Universe’ is NOT the background u-n-i-v-e-r-s-e lettering of which the Universe is made but merely a human language to refer to it, the cartesian graph with its lineal single time-clock and continuous paper-white space is NOT the ‘substance’ of which the Universe is made but a ‘linguistic representation’ of it, to make practical human point-of-view measures.

So it is useful for praxis of science but a  philosopher of science looking for the whys must be fully aware that the artefact of absolute space and time does NOT exist in the Universe. Yet since we do exist as time-durations occupying vital spaces, that is, space and time IS, if it is NOT an abstract background, but IT IS, we must be MADE OF IT. And this is truly a very important ‘first principle’, to do an objective philosophy of science about ‘god’, man and the Universe. As I did in the pioneer encyclopaedia of fractal cyclical 5D space-time beings, which upgraded the models of relational space-time, explored in this blog, back at the turn of the century (picture of the spanish edition of the model).

Because of the success of analytical geometry for a praxis of building and measuring space-time events from the referential point of view of man, was so enormous, the philosophical error of confusing the graph of mathematics used to measure time and space, with time and space itself, didn’t bother earlier physicists, which were concerned only with the praxis of measure and the construction of mostly entropic systems of war and transport (weapons, engines).

This bias due to praxis in science is often forgotten but plagues physics and we shall see soon history and economics, as sciences which are more concerned with power and action, construction and reproduction of systems than first principles. So the bias tends to make physical theories of the Universe entropic ‘big-bang’ like theories that match the job of creating entropic machines and weapons, ‘conveniently’ forgetting, as irrelevant the arrow of informative forces which balance entropic forces (i.e. entropy theories come from gaseous states of matter, which conveniently forget the crystal order of reproduction of information of solid states; the expansion of intergalactic space, origin of big-bang only theories, conveniently forgets the imploding informative nature of galaxies that create matter from vacuum space, curving and balancing the expansion of dark entropy, and what IS MORE IMPORTANT, defining planet Earth and life, as part of that vortex of galactic information as systems that evolve life and technological information) and so on.

So the reader should dismiss from the beginning his beliefs on a single entropic Universe, as an ‘idol of the tribe’, in Baconian terms; that is, a theory biased by power, proved false by the repetitive, energetic and informative events of the Universe.

Indeed, the physical theory of the Universe is an entropic theory where time-information is submissive to space; because most physicists are no aware the bias on his definition of time, produced by the worldly profession of physicists, due to the enormous respect machines and weapons cause in our technological civilisation.

Instead, for the ultimate whys he must look for the discipline of knowledge dedicated to that search  which is philosophy of science, because it does have NO praxis or power to impose biased, conscious, historic or subconscious views and because it does respect in equal footing every scalar plane and discipline of stience – unlike physics with its entropy bias and professional bias, as they naturally try to construct all scalar planes as if ORIGINATED by the particle scalar plane they study, unaware of the ABSOLUTE relativity of all those scalar planes, all of them self-similar, co-existing as organic structures across three ternary ∆-scalar planes, performing similar ternary time-arrows and ultimately being made to the image and likeness of all other beings of the cosmos.

This larger, more complex view, perhaps less precise in some measure details, however embraced by the correspondence principle as ‘details’ of those larger thoughts of God is not new at all, but it has been expressed with more or less rigour by all the philosophers of science of the western an eastern tradition, without bias, in search of whys, as we shall repeat the Universe is a simple structure, made complex by its fractal repetition an multiplicity of variations in its ensembles. In the modern age, it was in fact underlying the work of the two founders of modern mathematics an philosophy of science, Descartes and Leibniz.

Indeed, modern philosophers of science, notably Descartes, who had designed the graph, and Leibniz, who used it to give the first hints to the scalar nature of the Universe with its infinitesimal calculus, where each point had a ‘world of infinitesimal parts within itself’, understood if mathematics worked as mind-mirrors with a center of reference, it was because the Universe must be filled with selves, ordering its territories from their points of view.

Both realized that if they could use a mathematical self-centred frame of reference to extract laws of science from it, it meant that the Universe was filled with topo-logic ‘selves’, points of view which mimic those graphs to act in the Universe from an infinite number of self-centred frames.

And thus a philosophy of science about a fractal sentient Universe, appeared from the very beginning of modern science, which the practical, pedestrian attitude of physicists, who ‘never ask the whys’, soon relegated to oblivion. Let us regain those insights of the founding fathers of philosophy of science, to understand the whys of the Universe.

We are all made of relational, vital space and time frequencies.

Leibniz argued with Newton that absolute ðime§pace – an artifact of measure obtained from the transposition of a sheet of paper drawn with a mathematical coordinates to the entire Universe – did not exist.

That beings occupied a certain §pace and lasted a certain ðime, different from each other. So we were all beings made of relational ðime§pace, the ‘ultimate reason of things’ or necessary substance. In the graph, on the left Leibniz’s view that gets away with the ‘nowhere to be seen’, paper an pen absolute graph of ðime§pace of Newton for the sake of ‘epistemological truth’. Space is what those objects occupy, and below there is another ‘scalar plane of §pace’ (which ultimately becomes ‘background radiation’, that is light ðime§pace, or gravitational waves even smaller in size).

So §pace is really a series of fractal layers of growing scalar planes of size. On the other hand, each of those objects will have ‘rhythms’ and ‘motions’ different of each other regulated by its inner ðime-cycles (circadian cycles in nature, wave-rhythms, repetitive actions of feeding, sleeping, mating and son on), which are the essence of what they are. As when we say ‘I don’t have enough ‘ðime’ to do this’. So reality is a tapestry of ðime§pace beings, and the laws of those beings must then be extracted from this substance of which they are made.

Because physicists are not worried with ontological questions; but with measure of ðime motions an §pace-sizes, as they came to dominate science, the search for the ultimate reasons derived of those two substances, §pace and ðime, were forgotten. And what is worst, the reverence to the machines of physics, brought about the dismissal as ‘secondary’ theories, those theories of ðime, notably evolution, which studies the changes of form and in-form-ation of beings through their life-death cycles as individuals or species. And all what people cared about ðime, was the extreme precision of measure in physical analysis of ‘motions’ through that supposed ‘measure tool’, which is the graphed absolute Cartesian->Newtonian artifact of ðime§pace.

Things went so far that finally a single ‘absolute clock’ set by God was declared by Newton and assumed regardless of whom put it on motion for all beings. Leibniz quipped, when this clock found itself ‘different’ for the rotary clock-like motions of Mercury:

“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from ðime to ðime: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”

Leibniz. On Newton’s absolute ðime, its lack of understanding of gravitational vortices, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and the denial of cyclical, inertial motions, still features of popular physics.

It would take though despite the amazing evidence of ðime cycles in Nature an biology an history, (physicists as the high popes or ‘seers of ðime’ – definition of God in Saint Augustine’s work, do not consider relevant findings in other sciences), another physicist who realize the clocks of ðime around the sun decelerated, so Mercury ha different clocks, as gravitation ‘curves’ the form of those clock-like orbits more in its surroundings. So he discovered that after all Leibniz was right, and ðime clocks have different speeds in different regions of the physical Universe also (besides having different rhythms in different life beings).

When Einstein discovered the existence of infinite cyclical clocks of ðime (ðime bend §pace) and quantum physicists the broken nature of §pace, showing Leibniz right, physicists had gone so far into the ‘art’ of measure that the whys of reality, derived from its ultimate reason, the substance of which are all made, quantum §pace and cyclical ðime was parked as an ‘inconvenient truth’. ‘Leibniz is right – said Einstein – but if so we have to rebuild science from in its inception’.

So Leibniz, by far the highest mind of science in the western tradition, only comparable to the father of them All, Aristotle, was again denied, as Newton had done in a rather despicable way, accusing him of plagiarism for discovering and publishing earlier calculus, forbidding him to accompany the new king of England, and publishing in the royal society. Now simply speaking, Physicists didn’t feel intelligent enough to fully grasp the concepts behind relational ðime§pace and expand our view of the Universe of ðime§pace. So another century passed.

But truth, as complex as it might be always returns with a vengeance. ‘Truth exists’ and so the goal of reaching a more complex understanding of the fundamental principles of reality space, time, its casual actions that combine both and the minds that perceive them – will always be the goal of the philosopher of science.

Essentially all clocks of time are cyclical motions, so the speed of a clock of time depends on the number of ‘Herzs’ or frequency of its motion, the smaller the more Herz, as information is the form-frequency of those cycles, smaller beings have more information and code larger beings, but and that is the ‘trick’ that creates teh fifth dimension, the ‘general law’ of those tme clocks is accelerated.

i.e. Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass, define mass as an accelerated vortex of grvitational information, our life existence is accelerated when you are a seminal seed, etc.

physicists  uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation… humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time. Einstein  just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.

Einstein more than in its discoveries in its quotes and thoughts showed to have a grasp of it: ‘Leibniz is right, there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from the beginning’ and its panpsychism pantheist Universe,.ð

According to Leibniz, space and time are not so much things in which bodies are located and move as systems of relations holding between things. Einstein added ‘Leibniz was right but if so we have to rebuild the entire scaffolding of science from its inception’.

So we shall do it here.

All what there is there is mindless, wanting to be free, ever circling time beings. Space is the stillness that creates the whole however, and the whole encases and quiets if briefly the time cycles.

But if we postulate the existence of God, the minds of all minds, the supreme T.œ, which is pure space, a form that does not seem to move just fleeting vibrations of infinite self-repetitive existences encoded as the potential of that still mind, within all its variations, the whole of wholeness, which has the absolute code of all the imperative Universe, whose ternary syntax will live and die – already remembered, in some eon corner of that block of time-space in 5² Dimensions, the immortal program of finitesimal fractal mind-points.

Those infinite minimalist, free time cycles, enclosed in the god-singularity/membrane, are however indistinguishable for the monad, which is a mere wheel moving its synchronised central time-vortex of spatial form and maximal speed, both together -and its actions as periodic motions that make it reproduce=move in space. yet this space-time reprodcution>stop-information, is unbalanced St+s+st+s… deriving into an excess of §-form, which then will explode in time-motion in an expansion of entropy:

What is space and what is time as inverse ‘functions’ related in parallel by its many properties makes its qualitative definition perhaps suspicious to the ‘only’ mathematical mind, but necessary.

Space is form and as such space is the mind. The mind though is reduced space. Outside there the full space is more complex, richer and hides its motions of its parallel dimensions of time.

So it is confusing when we realise that time is motion and can be lineal time, duration and cyclical time, ðƒ and both are inverse, such as t=1/ƒ, and both can be defined as |t and Ot, which then combine in wave-time, Ø… And so happens actually with lineal $pace, and §pace, fractal, cyclic. So what we really mean as time and space, motion and form? merely that, the perception of motion or time and of form or space. The mind thus is space but curiously enough commands the time actions of the system, doing a beat more or less like:

S-mind: ∑ T: ÅCTIONS

The beats of the mind thus start the motions of reality. And as the mind is pure form, pure planning pure ideal perfection within the syntax of its mirror from then on is all entropic time, down the ladder of expansive repetitions in space, entropic lineal motions in time, erasing, NOT improving, THE FAULTY repetitions of the mind-image which the physical reality insists in not printing perfectly.

Space is the simultaneous perception by a point of view of a series of time cycles, in a quantum of time, a slice of the flow of time. This is a first definition.

And it immediately relates space to a present slice of time, simultaneously connected by a third observer. This is what Einstein worked with his ‘derivatives of present time’, according to both Galilean and Einsteinian relativity, which measures with ∂s/∂t, slices of the flow of time-space a simultaneous moment, a pictorial photography of the vortices of space-time studied by Newton (through the concept of force) and Poisson (through the concept of Gradient) latter laboured by Laplace and Hamilton into the concept of a closed cycle of energy, which becomes a ‘unit of information’, a ‘slice of present’.

In the graph paths of worldcycles, which can be expressed simultaneously in space, and summoned up for a social wave. The beats of time and its synchronous motions of collective smaller beats in herds and synchronous super organisms is mimicked by the laws of mathematical physics and time frequencies.

SPACE IN BIOLOGY: TERRITORIAL SPACES

External dimensions/networks of organisms: territories.

The key element of Non-E geometry are the 3 topologic regions of all systems, as that is the underlying structure that evolutionary topology develops, with a singularity, @, dominating a vital territory enclosed by a membrane.

It is the mixture of function in time through actions of survival that dominates the spatial ternary structure of those T.œs which guides the understanding of vital geometry.

I.e. “Though most arachnids are solitary animals, some spiders live in enormous communal webs housing males, females, and spiderlings. Most of the individuals live in the central part of the web, with the outer part providing snare space for prey shared by all the inhabitants”. Britannica

Indeed, regardless of the vital topology of the point, all ‘build ups’ of new geometric scalar planes start with the simplest form, a ‘bidimensional territory’ with a membrane, a central singularity and the vital energy between them. So geometry not only evolves in the humind in complexity, it does so in the evolution of the vital topologies of new forms in each single plane:

In the graph, all systems regarding of its ‘perfect geometry’, have the same ternary structure, to which vital geometry adds motion, in a Klein-like Non-E structure, where borders of entropy=death can’t be crossed; so they are relative infinities – military borders, balls of fire, membranes. On the left we study in more detail a mammal territory. Any animal territory is an i-logic space-time with 3 zones:

An informative central territory (1) or den, where animals reproduce and 2 secondary homes where the herd performs secondary organic cycles (2,3).

An energetic membrane (M, 5) – an invisible limit that provokes a confrontation if a stranger crosses it and where most energetic preys ‘flee’ away from the den of the predator.

An intermediate zone with cyclical paths of absorption of Entropy and information; where we find a hunting territory, places to drink (E), to bath (B), socialize (A), defecate (D), etc.

In organic terms, a dimension is a network. So a living organism can be considered a sum of cellular quanta united by 3 basic space/time discreet dimensional networks, which are its physiological systems: the digestive/energetic network, informative/ nervous network and reproductive/blood networks around which cells teem, creating a stable, organic st-point. In other words the Entropy and informative networks of a living being are its internal, diffeomorphic dimensions (of relative length and height), to which the organic system adds a 3rd, reproductive dimension that combines both elements and represents the width or ‘volume of cellular quanta’ of the system.

Finally its movement in the external world becomes its 4th temporal dimension. Yet that 4th dimension of external activity can also be considered a network territory in itself, sum of the 3±i cycles of existence of the being, creating a bigger vital space that will become the basic unit of an ecosystem or social organism made of individuals of the same species. In the figure we draw the vital territory of a minimal social pair of mammals, differentiated in 3 clear sub-sectors:

Max.Information: Informative den or central territory (1,2,3):

It is the territory of reproduction used to copulate and store basic food and Entropy to raise the young. It is a forbidden zone where not even hunting is allowed (4). In social species of great mobility, aerial or marine, where borders are much more extensive, this territory is very ample and tends to be located in warm latitudes.

Entropy=Information: Dual Territory of Entropy hunting and informative socialization (5).

It is the feeding, social and hunting territory, on which the central informative being feeds itself. It is outside the zone of reproduction. It is the winter territory of many migratory birds.

Given the relativism of all movement, in biological territories the informative singularity moves to hunt its Entropy quanta, as opposed to galaxies where stars and space-time dust moves towards the central worm hole.

Within those limits there are also neutral territories of communication, courtship reproduction and free Entropy, like water troughs. So the intermediate territory works both, as an informative and energetic territory where different victims and predators trace parallel cycles and come together around meeting points (E, B, R).

Max. Entropy: Borders that limit the territory.

Membranes are dangerous zones because the informative center watches them with special care to control any invasion of its hunting/social territory.

Those limits fluctuate according to the power of neighbors. For example, the vital space of a fish increases during mating, since the couple is more powerful than a single individual.

Marks (M points) fix those limits and reduce combats. They are often invisible, as most territories are defended against competitors of the same species, who understand the informative code of those marks; but rarely against members of other species. So we find all kind of linguistic marks:

Smells (common in mammals, like foxes, rhinos, antelopes), excrements (in canines and felids) or other glandular secretions.

Optical marks often connected to scents: The brown bear creates marks in trees, rubbing them with his head, warning adversaries of his great Max.SxT size and force. In human empires (nations can also be treated as biological territories) visual marks correspond to armies displayed in the borders. In human homes those marks used to be shields with weapons; now they are cars and other proofs of money, the new language of social power.

High pitch, acoustic marks, proper of birds, which are triggered when a rival enters the territory.

Recap. Vital territories of animals and human nations can be explained with the 3 topological regions of st-points.

The structure of §ð<TS<$t, territorial spaces with a central point of view, developing its particular worldview, trying to reach infinity with his distorted geometry, affine to a projective geometry where far away means small, defines each world of a Universe, which is objective when ‘clashing’ each form with all others – so only social love, and emergence through the scalar planes of the 5th dimension make survival possible. Geometry is then the study of the spatial form that the functions which dominate the vital, sentient Universe, adopt in their existential actions.

 

 

 

SPACE IN SOCIAL SCIENCES: HUMAN SUPŒRGANISMS AND INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS.

Nations, civilizations or mankind at large are supeœrganisms. And the goal of social sciences is to improve the design of the world theoretically using the laws of supœrganisms.

Its 3 physiologic networks: WHealth, $t (Gaia)<ST:economic system>§ð:Politic/cultural system

History is the super organism of the human, species, as in systemics informative species can be modeled as supœrganisms, whose individual ‘citizen-cells’ use an informative and reproductive language to build its social networks that distribute efficiently vital energy and information to its individuals, making the whole stronger and allowing a higher density of population. However when a system is ill-designed it will NOT provide just information and enough energy for its cells to survive. And this is the case of humanity, ill-designed by cultural memes of nationalism that divide the species into false tribal ones, to foster the ab=use of humans with weapons and the ill-designed capitalist system in which money is NOT the oxygen of society that must be delivered to each citizen-cell to start the reproduction and consumption of goods, but a parasitic digital language, monopolized in its issue by a small ‘cancerous group’ of ‘experts’, classic economists, working as financiers and company-managers that ‘choke’ mankind of its productive credit necessary to reproduce the healthy goods humanity need to survive (welfare goods), while allowing the massive reproduction of lethal goods of higher price that kill our body and minds. So we live in a sick system, ‘infected of lethal goods’, weapons and hate media, parasitized by a cancerous elite that monopolizes the issue of our blood language, and needless to say with a neuronal, ‘informative people-caste’ of politicos and military that instead of serving the body or else receiving judgment-pain messages to oblige them to attend the needs of its population, dedicate most of its efforts to kill people (military) with the excuse they are boxed under a false border-membrane buttressed with lethal weapons, or serve the financial parasites and its companies of lethal goods, with the excuse they don’t issue money, so they need to be corrupted and the alibi of immunity with no pain messages delivered as in earlier Greek democracies by the population that should vote=judge them after tenure. So we live in a system which enslaves people unlike in an efficient supœrganism of Nature, without parasitic and lethal germs=weapons, where its economic=reproductive and energetic=welfare and political=informative networks deliver the welfare goods and right synchronous=equalitarian orders to all cells.

So should a properly designed human supœrganism of history, where the ethic, verbal wor(l)d values of a political class, bound by judgment a posteriori to serve the needs of people will limit the production of lethal goods, issue money to multiply the reproduction of welfare goods and make history immortal with diplomatic EU, UNO like institutions on top of the fractal military nations built during the primitive ‘age of animetal history’. The only future for mankind thus would happen if our leading capitalist, nationalist cultures, and Financial-Media-Academia systems evolved its fundamentalist metal idol-ogies that despise the values and welfare life goods humans need to survive – despite its disguise of placebo caring newspeak of political and economical correctness, and impose a true social science of the economic reproductive and political legal system based in the efficient designs of nature’s supœrganisms to create with credit a more humane, legal-ruled global culture EU-UNO style, where laws control the lethal goods of the tree of science and money credits only the production of welfare, WHEalth (healthy life goods). History, the supœrganism of mankind it should be designed according to the biological Whealth humans need to thrive and survive, if the economic system was not an ill-designed parasitic system of debt slavery, born of the evolution of supremacist fetish gold cultures, in conjunction with the metal-entropic iron cultures that consider MONEY not what it is – a digital language of distribution and production of goods, no wealth per se, but a language that kicks the reproduction of those goods, as words do with human organisms and oxygen and hormones with biological systems – hence a language that should be delivered tool citizens-cells to start production and consumption of welfare goods, with universal salary and NO-DEBT government issues (that is not need to return the money). Why this has not happened then has to do with the Historic fight between true science and raw brutal evolution of those who ab=use life with metal:

In the top left, the welfare goods that we should be reproducing as they foster the creation of whealthy healthy wealth, which informs immortal history, the goal of all species – to create a perfect supœrganism that ensures the survival of all its individuals.

To that aim MANKIND potentially could create with just informative laws, above the reproductive economy designed to reproduce those goods and repress lethal goods, over a sustainable use of Gaia, our life planet – as we are LIFE BEINGS not technoutopian nerds, wanting to evolve into robots. In the left down side, the KEY element of a true science of human economics, i shall call ethonomics, which defines as all sciences do, their species of study within a frame of reference with positive and negative values.

IN the worm economy, all GOODS have a price value, there are no negative goods. And so the most perfect machines which are top predator weapons, as they are the most efficient metalife species, have maximal price.  This means capitalism, whose only goal is to maximize profits reproducing the goods of maximal price=sales will always promote war for profits, because ‘pecunia infinita bellus nervi’ (the nervous=financial system of war is inflationary money). Reason why the most capitalist culture today, America is the top predator producer of weapons (1/2 of the world production), to make pecunia infinita.

And so in abstract, the maximal GDP of nations has always happened in war periods. This tell us an obvious truth: a perfect capitalist system is one Orwellian war of eternal ‘splendid war for profits’, an eco(nomic)system in which a darwinian species, the weapon, kills a waker atomic one, the human being. And since weapons have always been the most evolved, expensive, profitable machine, the first robotic AI systems ARE being built in the army – all this facts capitalism and its idol-ogies censor, and technoutopians deny as childish ‘cannot see the sun and death at face value’. The economic frame of reference ends that calculus of GDP as it has negative values for lethal goods that kill mankind. But what are lethal, negative and positive ‘WHealthy’ goods? Obviously the goods that ‘maximize’ the 5 ‘pentalogic’ actions of existence, humans as a 5D organism require to survive. So we conclude this introduction to different Stientific spaces with an analysis of the 5 dimensional motions of human beings, which a proper design of the economic and political systems would maximize (see 5D History):

We are made of 5 Dimensional motions of space and time” The 5 vital actions of supœrganisms.

So far we have shown an organism from the perspective of its ‘whole made of 3 type of networks, which evolve together through the 5th dimension of space-time that puts parts through those 3 networks into a whole.

We need now to understand each of those cellular parts, in terms of its dimensions of space and time. Again, as present science is unfortunately very ‘primitive’ if you allow me to use that terms without offending your ego, in its modeling of dimensions, we need to start from scratch. And go back to the ‘foundations of science’, when Newton and Leibniz disputed the nature of space and time. We unfortunately chose the wrong guy, Newton; and so we have been on the wilderness ever since. Even Einstein who recognized ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start science from scratch’, didn’t dare to start from scratch. We however have to do it, to study properly any supœrganism including man as an individual and history as a supœrganism of humans. So be a bit patient.

Leibniz proposed a Universe of relative beings made of space in/form/ation and temporal motion. As reality is a nested chain of ‘fractal’ (to use modern terminologies) entities, and ‘each point-mind’ or monad hold a mirror image of the world within itself. Hence we live in an entangled organic Universe in which parts and wholes co-existed together to form those ‘chains of beings’; without the intercourse of a God; as organicism was ‘a sufficient reason’. Newton, a biblical pious believer, considered a single absolute space, the ‘plenum-body of god’, or void on which entities travelled through with a single clock-time for all of them, set by God. This error is at the heart of our concepts of time and space, which are basically born of mathematical creationism, by expanding a pen and paper graph invented by Descartes to measure locomotions over which it traced those measures to the Universe itself. And so Descartes Spacetime graph became the graph of the whole Universe. And time became lineal. We know today that all clocks are cyclical and there are infinite clocks, so each of us has multiple type of time-motions? Can we then classify all the ‘dimensions=motions in time? Actually it is very simple if you scrap what you think you know. Since we must evolve our concepts of space and time to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ that are made of dimensions of space and time. –

So how many ‘dimensions’ of ‘space and of time’ there are in each organism? 5 composite dimensions, where time is ‘motion’, and dimension is ‘form’. So there are 5 combinations of Space=Form (ab. S) and Time=Motion (Ab. T). Just play with both: SS, ST, TT and sT and St, whereas in sT there is more ‘motion-time’ than Space-form, and St has more space-form and ST has equal space and time, form and motion.

The big problem of science is in its reduction of time dimensions of motions to only one, lineal time. The 3 dimension of space however has motion in time: St, sT and ST.

And then we have a system with internal and external motion at the same time: TT, which is called entropy.

And its inverse concept, a system which is still in form=space, internally and externally and we call this state of pure form between ‘an external reality’ and an ‘internal mirror’ of that reality, a language or mind, SS.

The process of TT-entropic motion is called ‘death’, as it scatters the inner form of the being in an outer world. The process of SS-inner and outer form is the most fascinating. It is called ‘seed’, and ‘mind’ and ‘language’, and the deep understanding of it would require an entire paper, so we refer you to the papers on 5D Universe. It follows also that those 2 dimensional motions, SS and TT are the beginning and the end of a being. So in-between the being is really made of the other 3 combined space-time dimensions easy to understand, for any mathematician as ‘dual dimensions with form and motion’ in geometry are called topological ‘varieties’. And there are only 3 varieties of topology that can be ensembled into all type of beings:

In the graph, we see 3 classic organisms, made of those 3 topologic dimensional motions – which observed in its part become equivalent to the 3 networks, we just described. And thus we connect and find the ultimate why of supœrganisms: they are ‘mathematical entities of space-time’, made of 3 topological networks; the informative head-network which in plants is upside down, as it absorbs chemical atoms so the head of information of the plant is protected in the soil. And the head of the galaxy, which is its black hole. The 3 are spherical because information finds its best topologic packing in the sphere. So the 3 dimensions of space can be seen as motion; and we have therefore 3 basic dimensional motions of space-time, which become ‘bidimensional’, as they have now space-form and time –motion. We talk of 3 dimensional motions, and since there are only 3 varieties of ‘topological dimensional motions, we affirm that all what exists is made of 3 ‘Dimensional motions of space- time, (ab. dimotions or ‘actions’).

So that’s all folks. Any entity of the Universe then will need to absorb ‘information=St, that is Form with a little bit of motion, in-form-ation, form in action’ for its head, and they need to move with their limbs and fields. That is to have motion with a bit of form, a trajectory: Ts=locomotion.

And then it will need ‘energy, which is form and motion in balance S=T’, for its body, which is also a ‘hyperbolic wave-like topology’. And so we are made of O-heads, Ø-bodies and |- limbs, the 3 topologies of space-time, in the same manner a physical system is made of O-particles, |-fields and Ø-wave. If you have understood that, you have suddenly upgraded your worldview and comprehension of science 300 years. That is, the time from Leibniz to SoTo, which has ‘restarted all stiences’ (sciences of space-time organisms) from scratch and upgraded all ‘stiences’ each one studying a scale of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks, to this far more natural and realist model of the Universe that answers the deep whys of all systems.

Now we can plug in the other 2 ‘Dimensional motions’, TT-entropy=death and SS-linguistic seeds and/or minds. And describe a human being with them: you are born as an SS-seed, ab. §eed, and then keep reproducing your cells and form 3 networks that create the 3 types of dimensional motions you need to exist, and you go through 3 ages each one dominated by a dimensional motion, the Ts-youth of maximal locomotions, the ST-mature, reproductive age of balance between your motions and form, and the St-3rd age of maximal information. And then, sorry, you die. And so the direction of your flow of space-time in sequential order is: SS-Ts-ST-St-TT.

But if you notice the §eed is in the ∆-1 scale of parts (you are only a seed, a single cells). And this happens with every organism: a prophet is a memetic seed of a civilization because it will reproduce its memes in believers and then form a subconscious collective god-mind of a civilization, for the same reason your organism started in a genetic seed, reproduced in many ‘cells’ to form your organism.

Don’t be surprised, don’t let yourself be full of egocy: ego=idiocy as most humans including scientists are:

You are made of the same space-time topologies than an atom; your life-death cycle is the same that any supœrganism follows, including civilizations and its religious Gods; galaxies born of black holes, its informative seed (studied in our papers on 5D Universe, and in the future on the papers on 5D physics, still to publish, etc.)

In the graph I show you a human being, as made of 5 Dimensional motions in sequential space-time, as a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension: you are born as an ∆-1 seed, which emerges in ∆º with 3 topological networks, and then live in an ∆+1 world, its historic supœrganism, to die and return scattered to ∆-1: dust of space-time you are, to dust of space-time you shall return; simple, beautiful, profound but WITHOUT ego.
Networks provide goods and orders for humans to perform his 5 actions of live-survival.

All what exists is a supœrganism with 3 networks, which facilitate the motion, energy and information needed for its citizens-cells to survive fulfill its drives of life and emerge as a whole supœrganism united by a network of just information, call it the ethic law, god or the message of love in History.

Those survival actions are simple actions that provide the trinity parts of an organism with its functions, motion for limbs, energy food for the body, information for the mind; and complex actions, which provide the survival of the ‘whole’ – the supœrganism, through reproduction and family values and social evolution, through the message of love, that brings together parts through networks into the whole. So 5 actions exist in all cells of all supœrganisms, 3 for the individual 2 for the collective. In the maximization of those actions and its positive traits rests the welfare of the community and the building of a common God-subconscious mind:

In the graph, the true changes in time that matter to mankind are those of biology and the 5 motions of life, which define our actions and a proper economic system would promote through a demand, welfare economy. The study of human history, as a social organism whose changes are biological, informative is the focus on time studies humans should care. The study of physical change-motion, is ONLY a very limited part of it – the simplest of all ‘motions of times-space’; in the graph those of Mr. Bolt. The maximization of the complex actions of social reproduction (family values) and social evolution into an ethic legal network, God or constitution of history is the important goal of society.

This must be understood as the essence of the organic, fractal Universe: the complex dimensional motions of existence are reproduction and social evolution because only they ensure the survival of the species as a stronger whole. But in this world in its entropic age of self-destruction all the positive goals of mankind are denied, so we can evolve socially, reproduce, and become ‘enzymen’, slaves catalyzing the evolution of the alien species that parasitized mankind, and killed it, entropic metal weapons, informative go(l)d and its organic machines that substitute and atrophy us in labor and war field. And to that aim an astounding absurd world of ego-trips, fictions, false social sciences, and idol-ogies have been crafted by the leading animetal cultures to maintain the entire subconscious collective of mankind in a decaying, infantile, isolated, ego-centered selfie state. But ego centered, children are the staple food of the Universe. Enthusiastic little hatching turtles going to war for profits.

In the graph, with the symbols of existential logic (the formalism of 5D) the 5 Dimensional motions or drives of life. Each of the pillars of Islam refers to one of them, trying to strengthen its positive sides. We shall call those 5 actions by vowels and combinations of its Spatial information and Temporal entropy as:

TT: entropic motion that kills a system internally and externally akin to war. Ts-A: a-cceleration, locomotion, motion with a formal goal; TS: balance of temporal motion and spatial information, or reproduction, St: information, (S-form with little t-motion), SS-pure  spatial form; seed of form from where a whole code reconstructs and organism: language in its purest mandates and syntax. So TT-entropy, Ts-locomotion, ST-reproduction, St-information and SS-language, seed, are the 5 Dimensional motions, or ‘actions’ that ensure that a system will feed through entropic hunting, move towards fields of reproduction or social evolution, through a language to create a whole new super organism. And we find that all languages of creation of supœrganisms code those 5 + actions, from quantum numbers to genetic letters, to social words. While negative coding destroy supœrganisms. 

Because those actions are dominated by information (reproduction, social evolution and perception), however the actions of life form a sequence that tends to warp and increase the information of the whole, producing the effect of aging. Growth of information is the key process of evolution in time of all organisms in all the scales of reality. For that reason we require a ‘basic knowledge’ on the worldcycles of life and death of all organisms of the Universe caused by the evolution of information which death, its dissolution balances into zero sum ‘worldcycle of existence’.

 

COSMOLOGY: THE GALACTIC SUPŒRGANISM

∆S: ORGANIC GALAXIESITS SCALES ITS IN SPACE., TERNARY TOPOLOGIES.

Let us consider the structure of the supœrganism of the galaxy, in the same fashion we have studied all other supœrganisms of the Universe, using its generator equation; for simplicity in the following order, its spatial 3 parts, its, evolutionary 3±∆ ages, and its S-point, the central black hole of maximal information that connects it as a ‘whole’ with the upper scale of the 5th dimension, the world of dark matter and energy, beyond it.

Of course, we shall have to correct some errors and anthropomorphic postulates topic of all human sciences, which will make ‘scholars’ feel offended, but we are not concerned with the theories of the day but the larger truth of the structure of reality. So far, so good, within the Galaxy, we must affirm ‘don’t worry be happy’, humans have done for a change a good job. There is a limit of c-speed, the action of space-time of the galaxy; there is a temporal clock structure, mass, which slows down its time clocks as it grows bigger (even in the minimal scale in which mass is meaningful, that of living supœrganisms, so the clocks of smaller masses – rats tick much faster than those of the big elephants).

Let us then add vital topology and 5D scales as fractal organic properties to any galaxy, according to the known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes dominate most its creative prpcesses. So we compare by the disomorphism of scale the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with Ribosomes stars, of light ud-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the central nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.

DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane. The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls. So happens with a planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it. And the galaxy has in its center a black star.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets, when nuclear Physicists, programmed to extinguish the species according to the Fermi paradox, busy-busy recreates big bangs on Earth to ‘prove’ their absurd entropy-only theories of the Universe

Galaxies are super organisms constantly reproducing new stars, in its Ribosomes, guided by an informative field, gravitation, dominated by quark-like, strange stars and top quark black holes, forming a symmetry with its lower scales of dark entropy (tachyon, neutrino? beams, that stretch intergalactic space to z>c). We can see many of the homologies of the galaxy atom, which at ∆±3 clearly formed an isomorphism of scale that related them both as mind-singularity (quark top black hole stars) and elements of the ‘strangelet-halo of hard proteins’ and Ribosomesl region of ud, light particles, or atoms, which we inhabit, in the ∆º±1 thermodynamic scales.

Kerr rotary black holes would be top quark frozen stars with positive charge and same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. Once we had the ‘solutions’ (Kerr black holes), the study of those holes was limited by the c-speed turning event horizons, which ‘absorbed’ the light of electromagnetic matter after exploding it, and ‘digested’ it via the weak force, creating heavier particles.

While the halo is made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle. In the graph, following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for black holes and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor): primordial black hole stars are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ in a lower scale of size, on the Compton wavelength as heavy positive TCB quark atoms, while similar forms made of lighter strange quarks form negative halos of strangelet matter, which become from the point of view of the hyper-universe ‘galatoms’ with proton-like positive nuclei and electron like strangelet halos. Einstein asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As bct quarks appear in growing numbers in accelerators, tiny black stars then should be produced on them, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT-quarks), through its Higgs decay (H=Top + anti top quark).

The previous graph with its ternary elements, the Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which leaves energy and information enter through a cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, towards a center of information, is the fundamental system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), cyclical vortices of time space and a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. So the galaxy centered in a black hole (and the similar atom with its electronic cover, centered nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged) we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but isomorphic to any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

RECAP. We have seen for starters that a galaxy has the same ∆ST properties of any system of the Universe. We have analyzed briefly the hilomorphic relationship between its 3 topologic parts, the halo, the central black hole swarm and the intermediate light matter vital energy, and its organic roles similar to those of a cell, and its ∆-1 parts of quarks that compose them in a symmetry between the 3 families of mass and the 3 parts of the galaxy. We have also introduced the scalar big-bangs of matter in all its planes. And so galaxies are ∆ST organisms.

So we can define without further ado the structure of galaxies in space:

 The 3 Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : T (Halo)<ST: stars >S: black star.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy. Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> S (Black holes)

In the graph, a galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between Spatial Extension and temporal information). Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. S: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes10 should be called top quark stars, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. T: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– S=T: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the top quark star and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the top quark star and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black star.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.

Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

NOW, THE STUDY of those galaxies in time follows a closer symmetry to that of the galaxy in space:

So the little bang, was the death of the previous galaxy, or according to the quasar cycle of barred galaxies (and ours is a barred one), a 20 billion years cycle of birth and death of galactic systems, in which the central black hole suffers a cosmic collapse of all its matter, and then spits it out in a quasar explosion, starting a new cycle:

Spatial symmetry: T: Neutrino & Light background < St-ars > Black Matter

STARS: THE RIBOSOMES.

ST-body: stars. Time Ages

 The purpose of astrophysics is to study the supœrganism of the galaxy, Its generator equation and its symmetries of space-time, as physics is concerned with the ∆-2 supœrganism of atoms, its ∆-3 parts (particles) and chemistry in its ∆-2 societies: molecules. Let us then do a fast survey of the galatom’s parts, starting from its vital enclosed space of ‘entropic energy’ that feeds as in all organisms the reproduction of its dominant parts, the membrain of ‘strangelet’ dense matter akin to the electron of its similar atom, and the center top quark hole, akin to the proton, and with similar quantitative metrics. So the purpose of stars and planets seems to be to reproduce this coding center of top quark holes and protein-like harder halo, as the purpose of cytoplasm is to reproduce DNA and proteins.

This seems also to be the destiny of our planet, but in the meantime we can enjoy the view. Thus in the ∆-1 scale of parts of the galaxy, stars do live also as supœrganisms tracing their worldcycle, till the ‘chosen’ become top quark stars, and those who humbly stay quiet, last much longer as red stars, whose life could be of trillion of years, like the similar photons of our smallish infrauniverses.

Of course, astrophysicists do study those 3±¡ ages of stars and plot all its variations in the so called…

H-R diagram. Ages and Evolution of Stars:

In the next graphs, the Time-space symmetries of stars, along its relative ‘S’ and T parameters of TT ctral type (frequency-form) and spatial size.

They form a lineal function except in the Lorentzian limiting regions, inn which stars will both collapse into a big-bang that will dissociate its parts, Max. T x S, but also give birth to a more evolved Max. S being, which in the case of neutron and black hole stars will imply an evolution from the ∆-thermodynamic scale of ud-quarks into the gravitational scales in 0 temperatures of black holes and neutrons stars

In that regard the life of Stars and its organic form have a simple a(nti)symmetric equation in time and space:

Time ages: ∆+2: T: Gas Nebulae≥ ST: H-R sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole

Space topology: ∆+2: T: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≥ S: Nuclei

Flowchart of Stellar Evolution

All stars follow the same basic series of steps in the lives.
Low-mass stars go through a red giant phase which ultimately turns into a planetary nebula with a white dwarf in the center.
High-mass stars go through a red supergiant phase which ultimately results in a supernova, leaving behind either a neutron star or a black star.
The deciding factor in the fate of a star is its mass.
Stars whose core is less than 1.4 solar masses (the Chandrasekhar limit) will leave behind a white dwarf, the size of which is inversely related to its mass.

The initial mass of this star is much greater than its core, but much of the mass is lost once the planetary nebula separates from the core.
Stars whose core is in the range 1.4-3 solar masses will leave behind a neutron star (much denser than a white dwarf). Note that the initial mass of this star is much greater than its core, but much of the mass is lost during the supernova phase.
Above 3 solar masses (the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit), a quark star might be created, although this is currently mostly conjecture.
Any stellar core over 5 solar masses will inevitably succumb to gravitational collapse, producing a black hole (much denser than a neutron star).

Nova

If a white dwarf has a close binary companion, the white dwarf may accrete gas from the companion’s outer atmosphere. The gravitational energy released by the captured gas may be sufficiently great to start a fusion reaction on the surface of the white dwarf. This flare-up is known as a nova.
A nova can recur many times, is about 100,000 solar luminosities.
fades after a few months (sometimes years).
is more common than supernovas (2-3/yr observed, about 200 so far).

In the graph, the balance between the central zero-point of ‘gravity’ and the ST-pressure of radiation.

5D Asymmetry: ∑ œ-1: plasma particles>∏Œ: Stars>∆+1: Galaxy

As in the case of other Œ-species we shall study here its main features, according to the linguistic-isomorphic method starting from the subjective errors of human perception.

As usual humans perceive better the time ages and worldcycle of any species by observing them in space in different states of their time cycle. This is the case of stars and it is called the H-r Diagram, which therefore will be the first symmetry studied here.

The symmetry of its 5D planes is also well known as stars are the factory that reproduces atoms of the intermediate space-time of the galaxy (our ud-matter world) and finally when they die produce both strangelet (pulsar stars) and black holes (huge stars with enough mass to collapse into a reversed particle reaction till creating at op quark star). So the biggest uncertainty of stars happens in the analysis of its central S-nucleus.

Stars in that sense can only be observed externally and from the external phenomena (granules, magnetic fields gravitational forces) to deduce some of its internal properties. 5D physics allow us to model further the internal S-center of stars and consider likely the main error of star analysis, the lack of understanding of its internal structure, which as all S elements, should be highly informative, hence cold. Thus the center of the star must be NOT as hot as the membrane but much colder.

This realization we adventured decades ago for planets, and it was latter proved (planets have solid crystal cores). And it should be proved for stars, whose center should be made of super fluid helium and hydrogen, and likely be able to produce cold fusion (as all thermodynamic processes must have an asymmetric duality between cold processes made in slow time, with minimal energy (min. T x Max. S) and hot processes made in fast time with maximal energy (Max. T x min. S), in a clear symmetry with the processes of conception (slow informative birth) and death (fast entropic destruction).

So we shall when completed deal with all those symmetries in the aforementioned order.

The H-R diagram shows the 3 ages of stars, through its Entropy & information parameters.

The life, evolution and death of stars are depicted in the H-R Diagram, which classifies stars according to its E & O parameters, as the atomic table does with atoms:

Max. T: Brightness or Magnitude, which is a spatial parameter that grows with the size of the star.

Max. S: Spectral type, (color or frequency), which classifies stars according to its temporal form.

Yet the H-R diagram is only a representation of the 2nd and 3rd ages of stars – since the young age of the star as nebulae of max. Spatial extension and min. formal complexity (as all young ages are) is not represented. So we add on the left side the 1st age of a star as a nebulae of max.extension. Then the H-R graph shows the 3 ages of stars and the main isomorphisms of T x S cycles applied to them:

– (∆+1): Most stars are born as spatial nebulae of max. extension.

– Max. T: Then they implode into blue giants of max. Entropy.

– S≈T: They reduce its size and grow in atomic complexity through a mature, yellow age of balance between their T and S parameters. The sun is now in that balanced age…

– Max. S: They collapse in a 3rd age of slow decline as its I X E parameters diminish toward its death, becoming white dwarfs.

∆+1: Or they evolve in a loop of growing I X E force (top right graph), mutating into a Top quark Hole.

From those elements it is easy to enunciate the main events of the time symmetry of stars:

Recap. The H-R graph shows also the process of evolution of stars into Top quark Holes, which can be explained both mathematically and organically, based in the self-similarity of all space-time species.

Star birth

Stars are born from a nebula (cloud) of gas (hydrogen, helium, and a little bit of everything else) and dust.
One such nebula, often studied, is the Orion Nebula.
If the nebula is dense enough, it will eventually start collapsing under the influence of its own gravity.
As the nebula contracts, it heats up and the rising core temperature and pressure eventually causes hydrogen to fuse. At that point, a star is born.
For stars to be able to sustain nuclear fusion, their mass must be at least 0.08 times our Sun’s mass, which is equivalent to about 80 Jupiters.

Stars cannot be more massive than about 150 times our Sun because they simply produce too much energy and become unstable at that point. (Note that several stars more massive than 150 times the Sun have been discovered, but these are extremely rare.)
When the gravitational tendency to collapse is balanced by the tendency to expand due to the heat generated by nuclear fusion, the star is said to be in hydrostatic equilibrium. At that point, the star is on the main sequence of the HR diagram.
The newborn star will have a luminosity and surface temperature now that will change very little over the course of its lifetime on the main sequence.

Death of low-mass stars

Low-mass stars are those that end up as white dwarfs. High-mass stars are those that end their lives in a supernova.
Our Sun is an example of a low-mass star; Betelgeuse is an example of a high-mass star.
Stars with masses 0.08M < M < 10M (which is the majority of them) live quietly and contently, not changing much, for several billion years on the main sequence.

A star begins to die once it converts all the hydrogen in the core into helium.
As hydrogen is used up in the inner and hottest part of the core, the relatively inert helium-rich (hydrogen-depleted) core begins to collapse, and in so doing releases gravitational energy. This energy quickly heats up the outer hydrogen-rich layers and ignites the fusion of hydrogen in a thin shell immediately surrounding the hydrogen-depleted core. As this process continues, the hydrogen-fusing shell migrates outward and heats up the envelope of the star, which then causes the whole star to expand into a Red Giant.

For the lowest-mass stars, core pressure and temperature are not sufficiently high to ignite nuclear fusion of helium. The core then cools while the outer envelope continues to expand. Ultimately, the helium core forms a hot but cooling corpse known as a white dwarf, surrounded by an expanding outer envelope of hydrogen and helium known as the planetary nebula.

The Helix Nebula (also known as NGC 7293) is one of the closest planetary nebulae to Earth (650 light-years away). It is often referred to as the Eye of God on the Internet.

The Helix Nebula is an example of a planetary nebula created at the end of the life of a Sun-like star.

Somewhat higher-mass stars will fuse helium into carbon for a while to produce a denser core composed of carbon “ash” in the center, surrounded by a shell of burning helium, surrounded by a shell of burning hydrogen, which is surrounded by an envelope of inactive (no burning) hydrogen and helium.
If the star has even more mass and thus a denser and hotter core, carbon will start to fuse to produce even heavier elements in the center. Another shell of hydrogen burning will form, and beneath it a shell of helium burning.

Death of high-mass stars

In graph we consider the 3 sub-species of stars, the ud, light stars, Strange pulsars (neutron stars) and top quark stars (black holes). The natural evolution of a Given Max T x S function define when the collapse of enough matter can create an w2 x r 3 mass system with enough density of mass to accelerate its time clock beyond c-speed in top quark black holes:

High-mass stars have relatively short main-sequence lives: Max. T =Min. S.

High-mass stars have relatively short main-sequence lives: Max. T =Min. S. A 15M star, for example, lives for only about 10 million years before turning into a Red Giant.
And in its death, they reverse their function into the maximal informative element of the Universe, the black star.
When the star first runs out of hydrogen to fuse in its core it will behave similarly to lower mass red giants. It will first begin fusion of hydrogen in a shell around the core and the core will heat and fuse helium into carbon. There will also be carbon and helium fusion into oxygen. The star’s envelope also bloats out to very large sizes (Supergiants).
The supergiant’s core will fuse very heavy elements from carbon and oxygen all the way up to Iron.

Elements heavier than iron cannot be used as a source of energy through fusion. They can, however, be split into lighter elements to release energy, but this process (fission) does not occur in stars.
The star takes on an onion-like structure, with shells of different elements fusing into heavier elements, in progressively shorter phases.

For 20-Sun star, hydrogen is exhausted in the core within a few million years and iron develops within about a day (see table below).
Ultimately, when the star exhausts its supply of elements in the core lighter than iron, the core collapses in an extremely violent event known as a supernova.
The supernova leaves behind either a neutron star or, in the case of the heaviest stars, a black star.

Density/size comparison of white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes

A white dwarf consists essentially of tightly packed atoms which constitute the core of a Sun-like star.
The white dwarf of a Sun-like star is about 100 times denser than the Sun.
A teaspoon of white dwarf material would weigh about 15 tons.
The typical white dwarf is roughly the size of the Earth.
A neutron star is essentially the core of a star collapsed into a ball of tightly packed nuclei.
A neutron star is over a thousand times denser than a white dwarf.
A teaspoon of neutron star material would weigh about 4 billion tons.
A typical neutron star is roughly the size of a city.

A black hole is the collapsed core of a star so densely packed that it has virtually no size.
The infinitely small volume into which all the matter in a black hole is compressed is called the central singularity.
The imaginary sphere that measures how close to the singularity you can safely get is called the event horizon. Once you have passed the event horizon, it becomes impossible to escape: you will be drawn in by the black hole’s gravitational pull and squashed into the singularity.
The size of the event horizon (called the Schwarzschild radius) is proportional to the mass of the black star.

Astronomers have found black holes with event horizons ranging from 6 miles to the size of our solar system, although event horizons can, in principle, be bigger or smaller than this. But in principle, black holes can exist with even smaller or larger horizons.
Any object compressed sufficiently can be turned into a black star. The Schwarzschild radius for this object is directly related to the mass of the object. For example, the Schwarzschild radius of the Earth is about the size of a marble (if the Earth could somehow be compressed to this size).

Space symmetry: Internal structure of stars.

Stars have an ∆St symmetry equation:

Space Symmetry: ∆+2: T: Photosphere ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≥ S: Nuclei

5D Asymmetry: ∑ œ-1: plasma particles>∏Œ: Stars>∆+1: Galaxy

In the graph, the structure of the stars, which should have a central, liquid super fluid Helium vortex, and be able to reproduce cold fusion processes, according to the dualities of time-coldness, and space-heat.

 

 

In the graph, the most likely huge error in the modeling of stars should reside in the lack of organic structure and excessive temperature of the different regions of the system, as al what matters to physicists is the concept of energy-entropy. Thus the model considers the star a mere furnace of the different nuclear reactions but besides those models the star, the ‘plant-like’ system of the galaxy or ‘Ribosomes’ should have other complex structures. Essential to them should be the gravitomagnetic systems that connect the star with the black hole, hinted at the e4qual 11 years cycle of black holes activity in saggitarius and dark spots activity with its cold magnetic fluxes. Given the likely relationship between neutrinos and the background space-time of gravitation different amounts of them might be produced. Of great interest also should be the final connection between those G-waves and the planets, which seem to be placed in its nodal points (Titus law):

Interstellar and inter galactic transversal D-waves = Electromagnetic waves.

We give the general name of D–waves to Dark cosmic electromagnetism, likely related to faster than light (outside the galaxy) Neutrino waves of dark energy=entropy, to the cosmic >c transversal waves between galaxy-atoms (ab. Galatoms); moving at light speed when constrained by the galaxy’s light space-time background and inner gravitational forces

If made of entangled neutrinos they ‘warp’ reproducing light when entering the galaxy (Broglie’s theory of neutrino light), as particles entangle in the lower > c 5D scale of quantum potential (Bohm’s quantum realism). While they are emitted by galactic black holes in their massive reactions that create heavier quark particles, as jets of dark entropy, unconstrained and escaping back into the dark entropy lower scale of action at distance and null information -for our electronic perceivers of intergalactic scale.

Do D-waves exist within the galaxy? Likely as a quantum potential below and above the range of ¥-interactions between normal matter. As it happens in atoms where ¥-radiation has a very different behavior in dense gamma rays between electrons and protons, D-waves should on the interstellar level be considered rather transversal gravitational waves; which are useful to model interactions and distances between stars turning around the central black hole, hold by the outer strangelet membrane. So astrophysicists use it as tidal waves to model the shape of those galaxies. On that path a deduction of the 5D model, in the graph, is its use at different frequencies, maybe associated to the 3 type of neutrino waves, to calculate the Titus law of distances between planets with 2 waves of different frequency/energy, shorter for ferromagnetic planets than H-He ones, all of them sitting in their reinforced nodal points. In any case we are just highlighting with big strokes a field that will engage professional astrophysicists for decades to come if they get to abandon their Æntropic models of a single lineal time for everything that exists and then some – so all forces are modeled as a lineal exchange of particles; all births of cosmic structures from evaporating black holes to cosmic big-bangs with entropic time arrows, etc. Yet those entropic ‘arrows’ are just the final, last Dimotion of death of any T.œ of the Universe and as such they should be demoted in its importance in astrophysical studies at any scale of reality. As it is absurd to reduce the enormous beauty of the Galaxy and its cosmic bodies to the study of its death; akin to reduce the study of biological organisms to corpses. Forensics IS a very small branch of astrophysics. Let us then apply within the range of the known, hence scientific, experimental scales we perceive with enough detail to make serious science, the Pentalogic method to the galaxy, which we just have done in space, studying its scalar and spatial supœrganisms, now in time, studying its life ages, of which the ‘little big-bang death’ is just its quasar collapse.

BLACK HOLES: TOP QUARK STARS: S: GALACTIC VORTICES

∆-1: particle scale: strangelets and toplets.

Hylomorphism – the existence of an ∆-1 space-time ∑T.œs for all ∆º beings, supersedes ‘mathematical creationism’, hence it requires black holes and strange stars be made of a smaller parts, which can only be heavy quarks, whose function is precisely to the be the parts of its larger scales:

Black holes respond to the ternary symmetry between the 3 families of ∆-1 quarks and the 3 vital topological ∆+1 parts of the galaxy studied previously:

∆+1: top quarks->To: Galactic black holes, ∆-strange quark: Sæ: galactic halo, ∆-1: Ud quarks (our matter): ST-galactic stars.

Now, in this system, it is necessary to understand the role of the Higgs field and top quarks, which conform the outside-the-galaxy dark matter and dark energy.

Black holes are Kerr top quark stars and frozen stars.

Quark holes can be studied, once we understand their ‘higher why’, from the perspective of topological spaces and multiple space times, which limit is possible species and processes, either as top quark stars (frozen stars in the jargon of Einstein), or as rotational masses with the Kerr Metric; or from the many perspectives, of its structure as a system co-existing within 3 relative ∆-planes of existence. In the graph, its 3 topological regions.

Any organism extends through 3 hierarchical scales. For example, a human organism is composed of cells and carbohydrate molecules whose minimal unit is the amino acid. In the Galaxy there are 3 scales of mass and each of those 3 scales become the fractal parts of the next scale. In each of them we find an informative, cyclical type of mass: quarks in quantum atoms; black holes, which should be top quark stars in star-size black holes; and swarms of black holes in hyper-black holes at the center of galaxies and perhaps the Galaxy.

Thus a hierarchical organic structure grows from those inner parts: its strings become gluons that become quarks that become black holes that form hyper-black holes, in a stair of fractal systems of increasing complexity.

This is proved by the fact that the Black star’s event horizon membrane reduces light to its minimal bits of information (Planck’s areas), whose length is the minimal length of strings, which they extract from light. Since strings are both the theoretical components of black holes and strong forces, quarks and gluons, a description of black holes with tachyon, boson strings becomes the mathematical bridge between both scales. Thus indeed, black holes are fractals of quarks, fractals of gluons and strings (mind the reader though that those strings have fractal dimensions, are background independent, tachyon strings, defined by the Nambu’s actions, not superstrings, a baroque fantasy of Pythagorean Physics).

Each of those scales becomes the informative center that interacts with a reproductive body of electromagnetic electrons, stars and galaxies. Let us then study black holes in their interaction with its bodies, galaxies that explode in its big-bang death as quasars.

S regulate that body black holes emit dark Entropy through its poles, creating the membrane of gravitation that ‘positions’ stars, as protons position with their gravitational and magnetic fields the electronic nebulae. Since gravitational Space-time is formed by the maximal informative entities of the 2 scales, protons and black holes. For all those reasons, we prefer the names:

-Frozen stars (Einstein’s name), since they are top quark stars.

-Kerr’s holes; since this is the rotational metric or black holes.

-Or top quark stars, because it expresses the fact that the black hole is a door to the other ‘world’ of dark Entropy, which it emits. While the name black hole, invented by Wheeler, to substitute Einstein’s name after his death and push in this manner his singularity theory, implies nothing is emitted by the hole.

In that regard, science when it is built to respond all the questions that exhaust the truth of the system, the what (experimental evidence), the who or how (causal logic), the when (metric spaces) and the why (topological time arrows) has also an inverse hierarchy of truth: Once we determine what we want to study, we must observe its why and how – its topological structure and causal logic combined (how/who) – and only then enter into the details, analyzing with clocks and instruments of science, its metric properties.

The excessive use of machines of measure, overdeveloped by the Industrial R=evolution has obscured that hierarchy, which limits with the experimental what, and the why and how of topological time arrows, what things are certain and what are just mathematical fantasies of ‘baroque artists’ of metric spaces, which are so common in the study of black holes due to the lack of experimental evidence on its details. Let us then study reality as it is, not as ‘Touring machine’ resolves it with an excess of metric information that ignores the deepest why and necessary isomorphisms of the why-Galaxy.

Frozen top quark stars.

Frozen stars are similar to nucleons: huge condensates of top quark-mass that create vortices of gravitational information with a negative curvature in the dimension of height. Hence, they exist in a discontinuous gravitational Galaxy beyond the c-speed and 0 K limits of Entropy and information of our Galaxy, emitting and absorbing dark Entropy at higher than light speeds and ultra-cold dark matter, perfectly ordered, probably under 0 Kelvin.

In that regard, the closest species to a frozen top quark star is a neutron star, composed of super fluid neutrons and strange liquid in a boson state, occupying a minimal space. The difference of density between a neutron star and a Top quark is small. So a Frozen top quark star could be the next evolution of a strange quark star with a ‘lighter’ cover of strange quarks on the event horizon, ‘breaking=killing’ the symmetry of our matter, packed then in a boson, super fluid solid state of bcb atoms and top quarks. Since the sum of the transitional weak bosons, Z and W equals that of a top quark. Thus: ∆+p=Z+W=Top quark.

The 2 poles of the top quark star.

Thus the main error about Top quark Holes is the idea that since we do not see them emitting Entropy and matter-information at lower than c speeds, nothing escapes a Top quark Hole. This is a theoretical absurdity (things don’t ‘disappear’), which now has empirical proofs of falsity. Since we observe vortices of mass and radiation that surround Top quark Holes, reaching super luminal speeds before dying into pure gravitational Entropy according to the Lorentz transformations.

And we observe bursts of matter and radiation coming out of the poles of central Top quark Holes in quasars at super luminal speeds. So Top quark Holes do emit dark Entropy and information at super luminal speeds through its ‘axis’, as atomic nuclei emit magnetic fields in their rotation.

The Relativistic equations of Top quark Holes show that duality since Top quark Holes appear with 2 solutions: one with implosive, informative parameters and the other with explosive, energetic parameters. Thus according to those equations a Top quark Hole ‘re-absorbs’ radiant matter and light, dissociating the photonic particle-state and wave state of light, hence ‘killing it’. both beyond their Lorentzian limits of c-speed, back into its ultimate components: photons evolve into electronic nebulae, and then collapse further into quarks, which become part of the Top quark Hole body or are ejected as quark beams; while light reaches infinite red shift and becomes dark Entropy.

Because the parameters of density of a stable black hole are self-similar to those of a top quark star, and that is the limit of density of mass in the Galaxy, it is easy to infer that black holes have in its center a super-fluid vortex of top quark stars; and so we can consider dark Entropy to be the ‘gravitomagnetic field’ of those top quark stars.

As in the case of the 3 solutions of Einstein’s space-time, which correspond to the 3 ages of the Galaxy but physicists dissociate in 3 different Galaxies in space; physicists have deduced that those 2 solutions to the Top quark Hole equations create 2 different type of ‘black and white holes’; when according to space-time duality they represent the 2 organic regions of the same gravitational hole. Hence we could call Top quark Holes also ‘mulatto’ holes (-;. Though we will use the term top quark star, more familiar to cosmologists. And define its E<=>o Generator equation:

Top quark Hole (max.T: external membrane: event Horizon) <Wormhole> White hole (Max.S: Kerr ring)

Quantum cosmologists never discovered white holes as independent entities, because they are part of the top quark star.

Topological regions of a top quark black sgtars.

Unfortunately quantum cosmologists ignore the inner structure of a gravitational hole as a fractal point with 3 zones that explain them:

Max. T: The event horizon at c-speed is the energetic Riemann membrane that absorbs radiant matter, breaking it into its minimal units, ‘Planck’s areas’ that become the strings of dark Entropy that feed the hole.

– S≈T: The intermediate zone transforms radiant particles and Entropy into quarks and dark flows of gravitational Entropy. It seems to be a super fluid solid: a vortex-like structure of quark condensates and gluons.

— Max.S: The central region around the polar axis or central, informative, hyperbolic, negatively curved nucleus.

That informative center is the final ‘eye’ of the gravitational hurricane, the white hole of the top quark star. It emits through its poles Entropy and information in the form of dark, quark matter and gravitational waves of dark Entropy in super luminal jets that we observe indirectly around far away quasars, as they become again slower radiant matter, creating irregular galaxies. Thus white holes are the poles of top quark stars, which indeed are the doors to the gravitational world of dark Entropy and quark matter that dominates the Galaxy, as cosmologists have discovered.

The equations of a top quark star show how it transforms the spatial, energetic parameters of the electromagnetic world into the inverse, informative parameters of the gravitational world, since a top quark star is an ultra-dense mass of highly ordered ‘boson nucleons’, packed into a single point of space…

Continuous physicists used to believe that the accelerating vortex reached infinite Entropy values in the central point or singularity, since they do not model masses, charges and Top quark Holes as physical vortices of mass with a Radius, Ro, that represents the discontinuous limit between the external, body cycles of the Non E-point and its inner, still, informative region or brain, in this case between the vortex of stars and the still Top quark Hole brain. Yet because infinites cannot be calculated they renormalize their equations beyond a certain limit in which they postulate 0 charge or 0 mass.

In fractal cosmology those tricks are not required as top quark stars are modeled with Non-Euclidean topologies, which have always 3 regions separated by asymptotic membranes.

Thus fractal theory solves the problem caused by continuous infinite singularities, as Planck solved the problem of continuous, infinite temperatures, when he introduced fractal light quanta.

In organic terms, beyond the event horizon of a Non-Euclidean point, the Klein disk starts and beyond Ro, a discontinuous, inner radius separates the body from the informative, still brain.

In the galaxy the event horizon is the halo and this final radius is the horizon of the top quark star. In the atom, those 2 horizons are the external Electronic radius and the inner Bohr Radius, beyond which we find the proton Top quark Hole.

The same pattern of 3 regions is found in a Top quark Hole as a Non-Euclidean point. The event horizon is the external membrane. Then the point in which the equations of a Top quark Hole reach T=0 is the inner Ro radius.

(This is the point in which Hawking says Top quark Holes become negative in time and convert themselves into time machines)-: We already argued Mr. Hawking’s confusion of physical time, a change in the direction of motion, v=s/t, and absolute time, a hyperbolic error of the Cartesian graph. Time in physics is change in the direction of motion. So what T=0 means in a Top quark Hole is that we reach the region in which the cycles of the Top quark Hole’s body end and we enter the hyperbolic, high central tube that ejects dark Entropy. At this point time – understood as change in motion – halts and the Top quark Hole enters the white hole region of production of dark Entropy, asymptotically perpendicular, with the form of a Belgrami cone.

The equations of Top quark Holes show also their event horizon as a bidimensional killing field that destroys the entropy of our Galaxy, since it kills our Entropy/matter into its ultimate units on the Planck’s scale, lowering as in all processes of death our components two scales down into its fundamental physical units.

In the biological homology, a human being is composed of cells themselves composed of amino acids that act as the minimal units of life. So when an organism dies it suffers 2 deaths: first its cellular tissue is broken into pieces that feed the stomach of an organism, which will destroy it till its minimal amino acid units, used to recompose the organism’s own cells.

When we study mathematically Top quark Holes they show also a dual process of destruction of light matter to its ultimate components, Planck areas or strings, used then to reconstruct the boson quark condensates of the Top quark Hole and its dark Entropy.

Thus top quark holes in their feeding processes destroy light matter till it absorbs its Planck’s areas, the minimal units of information and Entropy of our physical space-time, the equivalent to the amino acids that the stomach absorbs.

Then those Planck’s units, become lineal tachyon strings to form dark Entropy and cyclical strings or gravitons, the minimal units of the mass world, evolving into bosons and quarks.

Those quarks and dark Entropy is then expelled through the poles to balance the expansive entropy of our membrane and create an immortal Galaxy. Indeed, the expansion of space-time in the Galaxy is cause by the expansion of dark Entropy coming out of the Kerr top quark holes’ poles; yet black holes also implode light into quark matter and the overall process creates a wobbling, dynamic balanced, zero-sum of fractal expansions and implosions, in a Galaxy that will never die.

Recap. We define a rotating top quark star as an organic topological structure, which uses the event horizon membrane to absorb radiant matter and Entropy through its central, ventral plane, which transforms it into ultra-dense top quarks and gravitational dark Entropy, expelled in perpendicular jets through its central, hyperbolic axial white hole’s pole used to control the body of galactic stars and communicate with other Top quark Holes.

The Existential Cycles=Time arrows of Black stars.

Wormholes follow the 4 energetic, informative, reproductive and social arrows of all exi=stential systems of reality: They feed on electronic matter, nurse galaxies and stars, and reproduce in momentum collisions with them, evolve socially in super-Top quark Holes (galactic center swarms), and as the ‘long-lasting’ informative neurons of the galaxy and Galaxy, whose networks they create, its generational cycle lasts as long as the entity that hosts them (the same happens with neurons, the informative network of our body that last between birth and death). Let us study those arrows in more detail:

E>O: The main cycle of a Top quark Hole is informative. It creates quarks from electroweak matter and orders the galaxy into spiral forms through gravitational waves that ‘position’ the stars while symbiotically feeding their centers with Entropy that degenerates into matter. Thus the top quark hole emits dark waves of gravitational information to control the galaxy.

Those informative waves of Top quark Holes fed the energetic needs of stars, which therefore become chained to those waves without knowing its final demise – as gravitational plants, guided and herded by Top quark Holes towards the center of the galaxy to feed them:

-It<E: Their energetic cycles balance the entropy of the light-world. Wormholes first erase light and radiant matter, feeding on gas and stars; and then renew it, creating new jets of pure dark, gravitational super luminal Entropy and quarks that enter back into our Galaxy as light and proton matter. If insects eat dead matter to renew the Earth’s ecosystem, the top quark star inverts the time/space coordinates of the light-world to renew it.

They act as ‘the antiparticles of the white cosmos’ that annihilate radiant matter. Kerr top quark holes absorb Entropy from our light membrane by red shifting light, with different signatures according to their relative mass. The background radiation must be interpreted as the signature of 2.7 ‘background holes’.

Bigger, older Kerr top quark holes of galactic mass are below the Background radiation curve and so they can red-shift and absorb electromagnetic Entropy from it, feeding in this manner on the electromagnetic membrane. For that reason the galactic map of the background radiation has a central zone, with lower temperatures corresponding to the giant central, colder top quark hole.

Reproduction: Wormholes control the reproduction of stars, which in turn reproduce top quark stars. Since when a small top quark star crosses through a star, it catalyzes its explosion into a nova that leaves behind a neutron star or a top quark star. On the other hand, the ‘reproductive DNA center’ of giant galaxies is a massive top quark star structure that emits huge super luminal jets of quark matter, which catalyze the reproduction of stars, creating irregular baby-galaxies.

– Social evolution. The top quark stars that occupy the informative center of galaxies are like the nuclei of cells, swarms of Top quark Holes, which regulate the life of galaxies, as DNA does with cells. In the next scale, the dark Entropy flows ejecting by galactic black holes communicate galaxies, creating the networks and walls we observe in the grand scale images of the Galaxy.

Recap. Black holes follow in their events the 6 arrows of time. They feed on the electromagnetic membrane and its species; they perceive gravitational information; they reproduce stars and galaxies and they evolve socially into swarms in the center of galaxies and into galactic networks in the Galaxy.

The 3 organic roles and types of top quark stars in galaxies.

By homology with any other non-Euclidean space-time that resembles a cellular organism, and the Isomorphisms of ternary differentiation of all topological species, we can consider 3 types of top quark stars whose roles within the organic structure of galaxies will obey its arrows of time but will also become essential to the bigger organism in which they exist.

This simple rule, which we shall apply to all systems, is a tenant of the organic structure of the Galaxy – we differentiate species in ternary sizes, ternary topologies, ternary ages and ternary functions, which must be symbiotic to the higher ∆+1 organism in which the entity exists or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function:

– Intermediate, reproductive S≈T zone: Spiral arms. Non-rotating top quark stars are born from dying stars. Then they form bi-polar systems with other stars feeding on them, taking advantage of their gravitational control, finally transforming the biggest stars into new top quark stars. Those top quark stars probably gather into social groups, which fuse in bigger top quark stars and move towards the center of the galaxy where they can feed easily on its dense herds of stars, creating at the end of the process a central nucleus.

Max.Information: Nucleus. A top star nucleus is a huge rotational, ‘Kerr hole’ or perhaps a herd of Top quark Holes similar to the DNA nucleus of a cell. It is the informative brain of the galaxy that controls its fractal beings, the stars, with gravitational waves that shape the rotating movement of the galaxy, and establish its feeding rhythm:

The galactic Top quark Hole first attracts interstellar gas to the intermediate non-E region, where gas reproduces stars, and then it sends that gas to the central top quark star that consumes it. In the same manner, electrons, the ‘stars’ of the atom, feed first on light quanta and then emit high-Entropy photons to feed the atomic nucleus.

Those gravitational waves also guide in old, globular galaxies, the stars toward the feeding center. Yet there might be other structures of dark matter, coming out of the nucleus, similar to the Golgi apparatus of cells: invaginations through which top quark stars might flow into external zones of the galaxy to control the reproductive and destructive processes of stars.

Finally, the central hole emits through its polar zones, dark Entropy, super-luminal gravitational waves that probably communicate galaxies at super luminal speeds, forming the strings of galaxies observed in the Galaxy. Since according to string Theory gravitation in free, intergalactic space is not warped by electromagnetic branes that feed on them inside galaxies and limited to c-speed.

– Max. T: Membrane. Though we cannot see the galactic membrane made of dark matter, by homology Non-Euclidean topology hypothesizes that the halo is the energetic membrane, where small top quark stars called appropriately MACHOS, have functions similar to globular proteins in cells:

They create and control that galactic membrane of dark matter, which closes the galaxy as a black body; causing the background radiation, which according to recent empirical data might be local: They red shift light to 2.7 K, which becomes the metabolic temperature of the galaxy. They reproduce new stars and expel matter and radiation beyond the membrane: Since their rotation is perpendicular to the galactic plane they could create a positive or negative spin, depending of its orientation, provoking flows of Entropy and information in and out of the galaxy. Those outward or inward flows fine-tuned with the dark Entropy jets of the Top quark Hole should move the galaxy at the will of the central Top quark hole

The interaction of the membrane and the central Top quark hole should encase all other species as a perfect Max. T x max. It ‘upper class’ of the galactic organism in complete control of its inner parts.

Recap. There are 3 types of top quark holes that control the membrane, inner center and herd the stars of the galaxy.

The big bangs of the 3 types of top quark stars

The homology between the 3 sub-species of Top quark Holes and the 3 regions of a galaxy explain the 3 possible scales of feeding and big-bangs of those Top quark Holes; and the functions of the lesser electromagnetic species for the top predators of the galaxy:

– Micro-Top quark Holes, Background MACHOs would eat up the commonest celestial bodies, planets and moons. This is our function; and the fact that we do not hear intelligent life in the galaxy and that CERN is going to do black holes to ‘see’ if they evaporate could explain how indeed, all moons become background MACHOs and all planets are blown up by ‘metric physicists’ unaware of the ‘why’ of black holes, stuck in the 3rd paradigm of using machines to measure the when of reality. This smaller top quark holes would then migrate to the Halo of the galaxy closer to our planet.

– Medium Top quark Holes formed in dense star centers, feed on them, causing supernovas, creating intermediate Top quark Holes that migrate toward the center, forming the DNA nucleus of the galaxy.

– While galactic Top quark Holes would explode into quasars, (galactic big-bangs). And/or as ‘dark galaxies’, recently found elsewhere, without emitting light, migrate towards the ‘Great Attractor’ or hyper-black hole at the center of the fractal ‘cell’ of the Galaxy in which we exist.

Recap. We might be just food for top quark holes, which are born and feed on the 3 scales of electromagnetic matter of the galaxy: planetoids, stars and entire galaxies.

The Top quark Hole as a Gravitational, Informative Mind.

The center of the galaxy is occupied by a giant top quark star that seems to be the final, social, evolutionary stage of multiple galactic Top quark Holes, born out of the evolution of stars. It acts as the gravitational DNA-mind of the galaxy – a hypothesis, which mechanist science will always ignore. But we want to stretch your understanding of the 4th ‘why’-paradigm, describing those mind holes with the isomorphisms of Non-Euclidean geometry and supœrganisms.

A galactic top quark star is a rotating object, which has a minimal spatial size and a huge dimension of height since it is made of boson, super fluid quark condensates. Its homology with a cellular, informative center, defines a central galactic top quark star as an enormous gravitational informative center, which controls its galactic body, positioning its star quanta through gravitational waves. In fact, when we calculate the top quark star’s informative parameters, it turns out to be a perfect super fluid computer, with maximal informative volume since its speed of calculus equals its speed of transmission of information.

The coldness of the top quark star proves also the informative hypothesis: In fractal space-time coldness means order, stillness, necessary to create in the center of a crystal or a cryogenic CPU, or a super fluid top quark star or the focus of an eye, the informative, boson accumulation of pixels that shapes a still, formal, fractal virtual image, without friction, without blur. Thus, the eye of man is cold. The brain is colder than the blood. The chip works better at cryogenic temperatures. And a top quark star is very cold, made of quarks in super fluid, highly ordered states.

Wormholes do create a complex virtual image of the galaxy with its strings. Physicists explain those processes in abstract when they affirm that a top quark star has an extra 5th dimension and its equations are homologous in 5 dimensions to those of the 4-dimensional electromagnetic world of the galaxy it represents (Maldacena Conjecture).

The description in 5-string dimensions of a Top quark Hole is completely equivalent to the description of an electromagnetic galaxy in 4 dimensions. Thus as our brain has a ‘homunculus image’ of the entire body, which is what we perceive; the top quark hole can build a ‘galunculus’ image in its interior. The 4th ‘why’ paradigm provides the reason of the conjecture: the 5-dimensional world of string holes is equivalent to a 4-dimensional world; because it is the map of our galaxy, made by the Top quark hole’s mind.

In topology the central zone of any st-point is an informative region, whose dimensions are the sum of the body and membrane dimensions. In cosmology the galaxy is a body-like vortex of reproductive stars and the central top quark star is the eye of the vortex that creates an image of the galaxy, as the brain maps out the body.

The hyperbolic center of higher form/information has more dimensions than the energetic bidimensional membrane and the reproductive toroid; since it holds the holography that combines the image of the external world imprinted in the ‘senses’ of its membrane, and the image of its internal, reproductive functions it commands. Since our galaxies have an external bidimensional halo and an internal 3-dimensional vortex of stars (a bidimensional plane with an added dimension of rotational motion), we can easily calculate with the general isomorphisms of the Holographic, central mind, the dimensions of a black hole:

Bidimensional external membrane +3-dimensional cyclical volume:

5-dimensional hyperbolic nucleus.

This simple law derives of the general law of dimensionality of the 3 regions of a Non-Euclidean topology:

Information of hyperbolic ‘brain’= Information of Klein’s ‘body’ + Information Riemann membrane

And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

What this means is that the Top quark Hole must have an inner image of the galactic body, which it orders with its gravitational flows and an external image of the Galaxy in which the galaxy, its body floats, to direct its form toward fields of Entropy (intergalactic gas) and connect itself with other galaxies. This is what we observe galaxies do.

They form walls, strings and complex clusters with other galaxies and they feed on intergalactic gas and smaller galaxies. So they act as cells in a gravitational, organic soup and must have as cells and organisms do an informative, processing center able to have an internal image or mapping of its stars and an external connection that informs it of the outer world. However, we see only a 4% of the galactic structures; the rest is the dark Entropy and dark, quark matter that the top quark holes perceive to map out reality, which is like trying to recompose a cell, in which we only see its Ribosomes.

Another proof of this higher dimensionality is given by the Kaluza-Klein models, which explain our perceived electromagnetic 4-dimensional world and the 4-dimensional gravitation over which the network of light is imprinted, as if they were born from a larger 5-dimensional gravitational world. Finally, gravitons are the only particles that can have 5-spin positions=informative dimensions. Thus, all those self-similar theories point out to the fact that we are a floating membrane within a bigger, faster, more complex Gravitational Galaxy.

Recap. In fractal cosmology the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region. This is the role of Top quark Holes in galaxies, forming with other Top quark Holes, communicated through flows of dark Entropy, the informative network that controls the Galaxy. Therefore it has the dimensions of its membrane and inner body of stars.

What degree of organic determinism exists in the galacells, and does it include the role of man within it? It seems to do given the way in which huminds are pushing the creation of black holes and strangelets on this planet (accelerator industry) with the excuse of testing the hypothetical big bang, which will be just an ice-9 or gas-9 reaction (transformation of Ud-matter into USD-matter or TBC-matter), and the lack of Intelligent Life in the cosmos or for ‘that matter’ in this planet. But those are themes of bio-history… as it would be absurd to make of a small ribosomal particle of the galacell, the center of our astrophysical inquire.

T: NEUTRINO AND LIGHT BACKGROUND

T: Neutrino-light backgrounds.<ST-ars>S: Black holes

T: Background Radiation: Basal Temperature of the Galaxy

As any system can go in more detail, by looking closer to its fractal parts, we can go deeper and deeper in the analysis of the whys (biologic and topologic), whens (mathematical and metric), how/who (Logic) and what (experimental) questions of knowledge. Let us consider thus in more depth just one of all the elements of the galaxy studied here – the organic role of the background radiation – the water of the galaxy…

The background radiation coincides with the radiation of a black body at 2.7 K degrees. Since in Non-Euclidean topology any fractal point is a black body; that is, a point with minimal apertures to the external world, a galaxy will only emit background radiation through its Halo, in which background holes will redshift light at 2.7 K. Thus the galaxy surrounded by a halo of quark, dark matter can be considered a black body emitting at present time as an isothermal organism does a background radiation, whose organic function is to maintain a homogenous temperature, similar to the organic temperature of living beings and ecosystems, kept by its water. Thus, the background radiation acts as the cytoplasmic Entropy of galaxies with 3 functions:

– Max.T: It provides Entropy to its bigger, colder Top quark Holes and its super fluid helium structures (not treated in this introduction to complex cosmology). Both happen to have a temperature slightly lower than the background radiation from where they can extract Entropy.

– S=T: It acts as the membrane limit, between the gravitational and electromagnetic membrane, within the galaxy, separating both worlds. It maintains also an isothermal temperature, as any organic system maintains a stable temperature.

– Max.S: It establishes a fixed frame of reference for the galaxy, allowing the process of information and measure, location and communication defined by Gauge Theories.

The background radiation is the ‘Entropy soup’, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, its Top quark Holes; as the hot water of the cell allows RNA molecules to move, kicking left and right water molecules with its COOH legs. Indeed, we know that only organic systems have a homogenous temperature. For example, humans have a homogeneous temperature within the limits of liquid water. So the 2.7 K homogenous background radiation reinforces the organic hypothesis.

Quark matter is the top predator form of the galaxy; hence they are the entities, which, as the elephant on the savannah or man on Earth, or aerobic bacteria in the earlier planet, have redesigned the galaxy with their organic activity. In Gaia, water, the equivalent to that background radiation, maintains a stable temperature, thanks to the feeding, energetic activities of its life organisms that avoid abrupt climatic changes. Without aerobic life the Earth would be like Venus – a planet with extreme temperature changes. Now it is almost isothermal. So happens to your body which has 36.5 degrees all your life, due to your organic activity as a water organism with 2 networks, a warmer blood and a colder, nervous, informative system.

So happens to the galaxy, in which the basal temperature of the background radiation separates the ultra-cold world of Top quark Holes and dark, gravitational matter and the hot world of atoms and radiant matter, allowing the exchange of Entropy and information between the 2 physiological networks that structure the galaxy.

Recap. Background radiation is the Entropy soup, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, Top quark Holes.

A future case of study: anti-neutrinos as the duality parts of photons.

– Neutrinos MUST be worked out, as the only particle with no ternary roles in the Universe at this stage to occupy a fundamental role in several scales of the universe or else they would NOT exist in such huge numbers. Neutrino physics in that sense is the most IMPORTANT field left to explore at this stage. As it has several properties which are coincidental with the roles required to describe the next scale of the Universe, that of quantum gravitational, dark energy and dark matter beyond the known-known level of galaxies.

My take is that neutrinos are NOT the quantum of gravitation as Bohrians think, because it is NOT needed, Albertians are right, attraction in gravitation HAPPENS because of the curvature around a massive central point of view (which makes almost indifferent for most calculus the other mass).

Only when A and B are similar in mass, there is a relationship of linearity and quantum gauging When one point dominates the other in mass-size and force there is not. And most gravitation systems around a sun, a black hole is of that kind.

Neutrinos do act NOT as forces but as communicators of information about distances.

They are hence similar to strings, in fact of the same minimal length – the Unit of length of the Galactic universe, and thus the ‘structural element’ constantly produced and radiated that webs a, background independent space, related to the ‘magnetic part’ of the light rays, they form together, as neutrino and antineutrino, reason why they are the only particles with left-handed or right handed singlet structure so they will always neutrino + antineutrino, back and forth, form a perfect, planar, longitudinal fixed distance between two particles to start communication between them.

This communication will then be realized by the electric field created by the articles above it,

From an action point of view, they can be seen as the ∆e ‘food’ of H-Planck light quanta, and first c- ‘space line’ traced in the communication of particles, the tending of the cables of gravitation and hence also the quanta of transversal gravitational waves, latter studied in more detail. All those roles are possible within different theories of neutrinos but none is fully and well developed (neutrino theory of light, being the key to them. But only as the origin of the magnetic field of light born of two of those neutrinos, which add up the 1 spin of the photon).

Next we must understand neutrino oscillation, growing in mass, from a practical zero-mass till collapsing into a mass particle   of the 3 Neutrinos generation – the tau which will be correspondingly much more massive (as Top and Tau quarks-electrons are). So they START UP many reactions, when they collide with particles.

And finally we must give it all the importance as in II-type supernovae they are the bursts of energy when those stars become black holes to form the underlying quanta of gravitational waves, but obviously not attractive but repulsive, quasar –like, nova like transversal gravitational waves –t he fronts of the big-bangs of all scales that carry the energy, repulsive dark energy waves, complemented perpendicularly by the ‘Higgs field’ much more massive scalar hyper luminal waves.

As Big bangs ARE as all systems that die, a broken SYMMETRY of two fields that created, T x S the system and now split perpendicularity as all the pictures of death of stars show – not chaotic explosions but cutting in two of the head-particle/field-entropy elements of the system, no longer in harmony.

Hence the ‘angle of the spins’ of the weak bosons, which merely says they angle upwards through the polar axis, while the wave of neutrinos explodes in all directions, without clear direction as the burst of energy.

This directional DUALITY of explosions of matter hardly understood is what explains the NEED for two particles the neutrino, almost massless and the W± Z H bosons with huge mass.

By all this I mean several neutrino ROLES are needed to complete 5D physics with Majorana neutrinos (neutrinos in which the particle and antiparticle are the same), which have mass and must be so far according to the general laws of T.œ, the gravitons of the transversal gravitational waves.

There might be outside galaxies faster than light neutrinos – something, which in the future would be easy to observe if we perceive a neutrino wave before the light wave of a supernova from far away galaxies.

Now essentially if neutrinos as all seems to indicate do have mass, are equal to their antiparticle and have boson qualities with ½ spin, their maths will be really fun. And I promise to get seriously pedantic with them on the 4th line (-;

Those neutrinos will be the feeding space strings for light beams (theory of neutrinos as origin of light fashionable in the 30s, and worked out by Jordan, Born, De Broglie and Fermi among others).

And any physicists could work out the details for those roles with some not so difficult modifications on the concept of a graviton.

In simple terms, neutrinos have the size of strings (measured in its weak angle scattering); and 2 inverse neutrinos moving back and forth between particles could act as bosons with 1 spin, and give birth to a light single polarized photon. Neutrinos are hyper abundant and with a minimalist mass, could account for the underlying structure of galaxies as ‘organisms’ with a formal structure since unlike planets stars do not move at different speeds but maintain the inner form of the ‘galacell’.

So the proper understanding of neutrinos as the ‘base’ over which light transits in the galaxy and the 3 families of masses as the components of its 3 T<ST>S organic parts, would put together all the points of view and isomorphisms of astrophysics.

We shall consider the theme in more detail in the next paragraphs.

In that regard the reader would notice the use of T.Œ, which no doubt as the century goes through and the theory is accepted to substitute mechanism as the philosophy of science that unifies them all, will become more important: to guide each science for the most likely to succeed paths of future research, through its stringent ‘economicity’ and enlightening isomorphisms.

So strangelets as the components of the Halo of galaxies, top quark hadrons of different BCT combinations as the cut-off substances of black holes, neutrinos as the h-Planck ‘strings’ of gravitational transversal waves between galaxies and within galaxies, the waves that maintain the stability and form of star orbits (of which I have read a few quite convincing models of astrophysics) are the most interesting ‘selections’ I have made on my constant ‘reading’ of astrophysicists’ paper, which is all what at this stage of my life can do for the discipline.

On the other side there are theories that do NOT fit at all within 5D T.Πand I doubt will ever be proved, SUSYs and background dependent string theories should be out of the picture; non-quark dark matter theories too, with all its array of particles. T.Πis limited because space and time are limited.

And what about the Higgs. As one of the leading activists against accelerators and big-bang experiments on earth, you might think 5D doesn’t have a role for it, but it does (given the chances to produce top quark black holes or strangelet that could explode the planet, in this I have been obviously very active, reason why the astrophysical community does not consider 5D Physics, but beyond personal careers one must be ethic as a finitesimal of the supœrganism of mankind – and that is what physicists and economists so strongly criticized in my work have forgotten despite whatever they find about nature).

Essentially the Higgs field and similar models respond precisely to the other element of the higher plane of existence of the Universe beyond galaxies, connected to top quarks of huge mass and likely 10 c rotary speed, and black holes and dark energy and dark matter.

In brief, the Higgs is the field of hyper-gravitational and hyper strong force, of 10c beyond the galaxy dark energy and dark matter, which is a taboo concept on astrophysics, because of an ill-understood conceptualization of General Relativity (it is not in 5D physics , as General relativity is a theory of the light space-time membrane or 4Dimension of the Universe, a present ‘slice’ of the time flow and the 5th dimension.

In their first paper on quantum electrodynamics, Heisenberg and Pauli asserted that quantization of the gravitational field, which appears to be necessary for physical reasons [in a footnote, they refer to the works of Einstein and Klein on that line], may be carried out without any new difficulties by means of a formalism fully analogous to that applied here.

During the thirties, the idea of a gravitational quantum came to be generally (but as we shall see, not universally) accepted by theoretical physicists, apart from the small relativity community that followed Einstein in his continued search for a (classical) unified theory. In the early thirties, there was some discussion of Bohr’s idea that the neutrino might be related to the gravitational quantum.

Bohr said to Pauli, (March 1934): ‘The idea was that the neutrino, for which one assumes a zero rest mass, could hardly be anything else than a gravitational wave with appropriate quantization’. Fermi had evidently had a similar idea, but was aware of the problem of the different spins.

Pauli to Heisenberg, February 1934: ‘Fermi would prefer to make a connection between neutrinos and half gravitational quanta.’ As late as November 1934, Pauli cautiously stated: ‘While up to now it has been held almost certain that gravitational phenomena play practically no role in nuclear physics, it now seems that the possibility cannot be immediately rejected, that the phenomena of beta-radiation could be connected with the square root of kappa [the gravitational constant]’ suggests that Pauli may have had in mind construction of a graviton from two neutrinos, along the lines of de Broglie’s neutrino theory of light.

They wrote: ‘The comparison displayed above indicates that the graviton and the neutrino have much in common. This probably testifies that in general the highly improbable process of graviton radiation becomes practically observable in beta-decay. If the neutrino turns out to be the graviton this would mean that contemporary physics had approached the limits beyond which there would be no present insurmountable barrier between gravitation and electromagnetism. Due to theoretical considerations it is hard to identify gravitons with the neutrino since it is hard to admit that they have the same spin 1/2 as the neutrino. In this respect gravitons have much more in common with light quanta. It is impossible, however, to totally rule out a theoretical possibility of their identification.

He concludes:

The so-defined gravitational quanta or ‘gravitons’ have the… spin 2… It is certainly a limitation of the quantum-mechanical side of this treatment, that one leaves it at that approximation, in which the general-relativistic field equations are linear. This limitation is most closely connected with the well-known divergence difficulties of field theory.

Apart from these divergence difficulties common to all quantum field theories at that time, Pauli, like Rosenfeld, seemed satisfied with linearized quantum gravity. But in 1935 Bronstein had already applied Fermi’s technique to the linearized Einstein equations, and came to much more skeptical conclusions, when he opined: ‘It is a task of the nearest future to identify the ties between quantum mechanics and the theory of gravitation… what will be needed is a sort of marriage between relativity and quantum theory’ He was stressing the crucial significance of the three dimensional constants c, G, and h in defining the past and future development of physics.

Those are the fundamental questions that physicists need to resolve in detail.

What T.Πprovides is the general analysis of the issue from the higher perspective of the organic laws of the Universe.

It is obvious that at this stage ‘humans’ will NOT accept in the present dogmatic, ‘believers’ in digital machines languages concept of physics anything like what we propose in this blog. But for very long I have learned to ‘eliminate’ the human concept of science in these dark ages, moved only by intellectual curiosity. So I write for future Asian generations or for robots, as the present ‘civilization’ of ego-trips of western men, thinking machines must do their job has no much of a future.

In that future, if humans want to understand the Universe they will develop a synthetic ‘above’ T.Œ, Organic Theory of Everything, and if they go under as it is likely ‘obviously’ robots will NEED to feel organisms, and they will ‘believe’ in T.Œ

So here it goes: T.Πis Simple, minimalist and dualist. All systems do have 2 organic networks, blood and nervous systems, and the galaxy does have obviously two such fields, the background light and background neutrinos.

This is the fact and so i couldn’t care less if in the equations of Mr. Einstein graviton appears at 2 spin and in the equations of Mr. Fermi, neutrino appears at ½ spin. Solve it. Nature has both and makes them unavoidably the same role. There is no other particle in the present state of the galaxy, which exists and can play both roles. Not it will be discovered, because it will have to be on the range of energies of the galaxy, which have been already searched for. It cannot be in cuckoo super-energies as they will not manifest constantly in this universe, and so it doesn’t matter if you can unify at 500 zillion Gevs the present forces.

This is not here now and in this conditions> so it doesn’t matter here now and in these conditions is all found and so you must account reality with the thing you have found as there is nothing else to find here now and in this conditions.

Work your maths, if you haven’t doesn’t it is not because it is not there but because something is wrong with your 2 spin graviton, ½ spin neutrino and spin theory. Ok?

In the case we are occupied, neutrinos are by far the only candidate for the basic actions between fermions, as a firs step BEFORE the communication through light space-time, which is able to transfer information in much greater measure, starts the organic built up of the galaxy.

So the way to explain the galaxy is first in its organic structure, then in its descending parts, stars and atoms and particles, and then when we start to explain the basic actions between atoms, the neutrino which is the quanta of galactic gravitation, appears unavoidably as the first connection between atoms and particles which lock them at a certain entangled distance for them to start communication. This resolves the fundamental problem on the models in which neutrinos give origin to light, already proposed in the 30s.

The neutrino theory of light is the proposal that the photon is a composite particle formed of a neutrino antineutrino pair. It is based on the idea that emission and absorption of a photon corresponds to the creation and annihilation of a particle–antiparticle pair. The neutrino theory of light is not currently accepted as part of mainstream physics, but actually is quite straight forward in its maths. That is it is perfectly coherent.

 

CONCLUSION THE CELLULAR GALAXY.

Galilean relativism (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) implies that depending on which kind of energetic or informative force we use to observe certain reality, we will perceive it either as a fixed, spatial organism (the Universe perceived with gravitation) or as an evolutionary species in motion through time (the Universe perceived with slow light).

So we see either a moving Earth and a fixed cosmos, when we see them through gravitation, or a quiet Earth and a moving Universe when we see them through light.

Since gravitation, the force that shows a spatial, synchronic Universe is invisible to our instruments; astronomers only study a temporal, diachronic Universe, perceived with light. However there is a universal organism in space, self-similar to any other Fractal point. Since once the evolution of the hypothetical cellular Universe concluded in time, creating the 3 regions of any fractal point, the Universe structured itself in space, communicating those 3 regions through simultaneous non-local gravitation. Let us then study those 2 sides of a hypothetical cellular Universe – first the spatial, organism of the Universe and then the temporal ages of creation of that Universe in the next paragraph.

If we perceive the Universe from a temporal perspective through its slow force, light, it appears as an evolutionary process of matter, coming out from the genetic ‘big bang’ singularity of a local, cosmological first cell – the hyper-dense singularity of the big bang (which went afterwards through a cold, reproductive ‘big-banging’ or creative, informative process, later studied in more detail).

Yet, when we observe the Universe simultaneously in present space (first picture of the previous graph), thanks to its faster force, gravitation that allow the parts of the Universe to interact, those far away regions become integrated with its closer regions through the informative networks of dark Entropy, NOT through the light, energetic networks of galaxies and stars, explaining its homogeneity. Again this is a generic law of complementary systems, as any organism is defined by its informative, nervous network that gives it its form.

Of the two possible ‘scalar’ theories of such Universe, one of infinite scales in which galaxies are atoms, and one in which universes are fractal ‘cells’ of a hyper-universe, broken in ‘bubbles’ of a fractal inflationary big-bang with a limit, the first one would imply a huge universe, in which we are just a ‘hydrogen-like atom’ of an enormous interstellar cloud. The second theory however would imply a structure within our ‘cellular Universe’, in which non-local, faster than light gravitation creates an organic Universe, structured as a fractal point, with its 3 canonical, topological, Non-Euclidean zones:

-Max.S: The cellular Universe should have a nucleus of enormous gravitational mass, a hyper-top quark hole, connected to a network of dark matter, which acts as its informative brain, since it forms through non-local gravitational forces the shape of its galactic networks, as the DNA nucleus of a cell controls the form of the organelles that reproduce its proteins.

Though the nucleus is a gravitational knot invisible to us, we have found a very dense region of dark matter called the Great Attractor towards which many galaxies, including ours move, which might be that center. That informative singularity will keep growing and attracting other galaxies in a generational cycle, till it explodes again its form into Entropy in a physical big-bang, similar to the one that might have created our Universe.

Max.T: An external Entropy membrane not to confuse with the galactic light background radiation and the dark Entropy spelt by galactic Top quark Holes, (which quasars show to reach a limit speed of C<v<10 C redshift). There are hints of this possible final wall in measures of dark Entropy expansion over 10 C<V2<100C at the limits of the Universe. But proofs are scant as we need better telescopes to obtain them. Thus we shall call this dark Entropy, the super dark Entropy, or next fractal scale of lineal forces.

– An inner E/T region with galaxies that reproduce matter and light. It is the visible space-time created, according to the duality of physical big bangs/big bangings: after the invagination of the inner nucleus of dark matter that clearly directs the movements of galaxies. In this inner region dark Entropy at C<V<10C communicates galaxies; while radiation matter is the food of dark matter. Thus galaxies form an energetic, electromagnetic network of galactic Ribosomes, which reaches its maximal density in filaments of galaxies, (near the center of the Universe).

Such cellular Universe has an energetic, electromagnetic network of radiant matter similar to the blood network of a living organism, which weighs only a 4% and reaches its maximal density in the external membrane and the filaments of stars, (center). And it has an informative, gravitational network similar to a nervous network, which reaches its maximal density in the hypothetical hyper-top quark Hole, brain or central singularity of that cellular Universe, the Great Attractor.

This network weights a 21%. Both feed on the intermediate space-time region of gravitational space-time (dark Entropy, which is the 75% of the Universe and acts as the ‘water’ of the Universal organism, also the maximal weigh of a living being; or as the background radiation of the galaxy, also its most common substance). This coincides with the general rules of proportionality between spatial bodies and informative heads, which are in a 3 to 1 proportion. That is, indeed the proportion between radiation pressure and mass; dark Entropy and dark matter, and many other informative/energetic parameters of the physical Universe.

The cellular Universe as a fractal part of the higher structure.

It seems quite evident that the organic laws of systems do define a Universe similar to any other organic system. Let us indeed make a comparison between a biological and cosmological ‘Universe’:

The Local Universe seems to have a dual network structure—electromagnetic Entropy and visible matter vs. quark, dark matter and dark Entropy, which forms its faster networks of information, the membrane of gravitation. It is the organic hypothesis of a Universe made of 2 networks of dark matter and light Entropy – cellular galaxies, which form a simply connected system, similar to a colonial tissue, with the apparent form of a semi wave in grand scale images perhaps, belonging to a bigger Hyper-Universe.

In the graph, in T.Œ all Universal systems have the same symmetric structure in fractal space and cyclical time:

T(limb/fields of maximal entropy) > ST (Balanced body-waves of energy and information) < S (heads-particles of maximal form)

Which co-exist along 3 scales of the 5th dimension:

∆-1 cellular-atomic scale ∧ ∆-Thermodynamic-Organic scale ∧ ∆+1: Social-Cosmological Scale.

And live 3 ages in time between conception and extinction:

∆-1: Max. S: Conception< ∑œ ∧ |Ps:Energetic Field-past-young age >  e xi: Reproductive present wave > S: Particle/solid state ∨ ∆-1: Big-bang Death.

This simple structure, applied to any system of the Universe, provides us a simple guidance to study the fundamental scales and systems of physical nature.

The grand scale images of the Universe show a structure with the form of a half wave, which can be anything in that upper scale, from a half light wave to a top quark like micro-organism. It might also be possible that as stars form spiral vortices, the mapping observed in the previous graph is the outer cover of a spiral Universe, with a central zone of hyper-top quark Holes, which would act as the nuclei of an atom.

We can’t know what is the next scale of form of the Universe, because we have little evidence, as most is dark matter and Entropy whose form we can’t deduce and because all scales of reality are self-similar so we cannot easily distinguish them; as we could not distinguish a bottle of beer with a bad picture of it.

The verification or not of a cellular Universe could be done by the Webb telescope testing the existence or not of a limit at 13 billion years – a dark region or wall of fire, which perceived in space would look like the first picture. Then we could reasonably think that the local Universe hosts around 10 10-11 galaxies in a cellular structure separated from other parallel Universes by a wall of dark radiation at z=10-100 C.

Recap. Super luminal gravitation and light are the 2 forces that interact in the Universe, which as any other Non E point should possess 2 networks/forces: the informative, faster gravitational force that structures the position of galaxies; and the electromagnetic force that acts as the ‘blood/energetic system’ of the Universe. Such Universe in space could be a cell of a hyper-universe or a huge reality in which each galaxy is a self-similar atom, with a background light-space.

So the Higgs whose fundamental reaction is Top quark + Top antiquark < = > Higgs, acts as the photon acts in this membrane, which as we all know reproduces constantly virtual particles and antiparticles, or as the gluon acts in the strong force which reproduces quarks and anti-quarks on the lower USD decuplet. All those are essential symmetries of 5 D Physics. And so yes, the Higgs does have a role.

But beyond that role, there is something called scientific ethics within T.Œ which is a unification theory that does not ‘split’ sciences from each other, but ‘make them all’ correspond to a role within the Human supœrganism of history. So all sciences do have an obligation to contribute to the future of mankind. And that is why I opposed so many years to CERN. Simply speaking, Higgs production of top and antitop quarks is dangerous. They could form black holes on earth that would not evaporate. As other experiments that produce quark-gluon soups with hadrons are dangerous as they could reproduce strangelet that would swallow the Earth.

Those are known known physics in 5D models. They will happen, if mankind keeps doing big-bang and Higgs experiments. And while in standard physics they are also possible, in 5D physics they are ‘extremely likely’ hence while other physicists have washed their hands like Pilatus, I had to denounce CERN even if it meant to sacrifice T.Œ to the altar of human ethics.

So this is the canonical model of 5D astrophysics, which I put forward 20 years ago, and still stands as the only serious candidate to explain the structure of galaxies and black holes, in astrophysics, and the entire meaning of quantum physics and the relationships of all the scales of physical system, as well as all other sciences.

So in the graph, we analyze the isomorphism of 5D space-time elements for the two main systems studied by mankind – the astrophysical Universe, and the biochemical world of humanity. Both should, according to the previous analysis share the same properties and arrows of time, albeit with different quality and amount of ‘complex information’ and ‘simplex Entropy’. Let us then briefly introduce those 2 systems and their self-similarities.

Despite the enormous difference of size and metric details, they are both topological, fractal organisms with the same elements of all organic fractals. Since reality is a self-generating topological Fractal of infinite beings made with 2 arrows of Time: Entropy and information, whose self-similar properties emerge invariant in topological form in all scales of reality. Thus all organic fractals, including man and the Universe have 3 elements that define them:

– Its cellular units, (galaxies and cells).

– Its networks of Entropy (blood and radiant ¥-matter) and information (nerves and dark-neutrino-gravitational matter) that organize those cellular units.

– And the relative space-time planes in which a self-similar but not equal fractal structure re-emerges.

On the left, man is a fractal made of cellular units and networks of Entropy and information (nervous and blood systems), whose cycles and functions extend through 3 hierarchical, organic planes of increasing size: the cellular, individual and social plane.

On the right, the Universe is also a fractal, structured in 3 planes of self-organization: its cellular units are stars and Top quark Holes that shape 2 galactic networks of radiant Entropy and informative, dark matter; st-points of a cosmos at ‘grand scale’ (the points on the picture). The final form is self-similar to a wave, perhaps inscribed into a hyper-Universe.

How can both worlds/networks co-exist together? In continuous space-time they can’t but in discontinuous space-time where a ‘dimension’ is fractal, hence it is a fractal network, it is rather easy:

The light Universe is a network, like a fishnet floating of an immense sea of gravitational Entropy. Each knot is a charge, a non-E point that communicates through the strings of the net (the electromagnetic forces), leaving a huge dark ‘space-time of ‘water’ – that 76% of gravitational dark Entropy – which is not ‘illuminated’ neither interacts with the fractal net of light.

Some Physical theories describe fractal space-time in that way, calling the fishnet a ‘brane’ made with cyclical, temporal knots (spins or closed strings) joined by flows of its lineal, energetic T x S actions/forces that tight together those knots.

The Universe sandwiches mankind between 2 relative scales of space-time, the quantum membrane of electroweak forces and the gravitational membrane of strong masses. Yet both membranes obey the same isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times. Thus, regarding their morphological structure both membranes possess organic, complementary systems with the 3 topological standard regions /forms of a fractal point.

Those are therefore the basic organic elements of a relative Universe, which validate the experimental, sound interpretation of cosmology and we shall use now to explain the nature of the big bang.

So cosmology does have a point of metaphysics.

Recap. Our galaxy is a cyclical vortex of space-time of maximal information, reason why we are informative beings and accumulate information. The entropy arrow does NOT dominate this planet, this species, this vortex of galactic information, but only the expansive space between galaxies, and the minds of Neanderthal macho-man violent physicists with its worldly religion, to make weapon of ‘mass destruction’. Point.

In the graph from Sci-Am we observe the whole worldcycle of the galaxy of about 20 billion years, which has been tabulated by observing thousands of them across the Universe in different states of the cycle, some of then undergoing what seems to be a second cycle. Our galaxy so far seems to be in the classic middle age of it:

As we can see the Milky way is a well formed barred galaxy, 2/3rds on its cycle, which is about 14 billion years – not coincidentally the age of the ‘little big bang’, and the sun is there living in a middle position, a middle kind of sun, with a middle planet in a topic warm region, pleasant for life:

 


5D BLACK HOLE STARS: HAWKING’S FORMULA: TOP PREDATOR BABY HOLES.

As all systems evolve in time towards higher degrees of information, so does our knowledge of any species. On those terms, we can consider black hole theory as an evolving subject, which has clearly 3 ages, of increasing detail departing from its ‘platonic’ mathematical synoptic mirror to finally reach a realist view:

The age of Einstein, when general relativity equations provided the theoretical foundation to study gravitational ‘vortices’, as those described by Newton, and then by Poison with his theory of potentials, of which Einstein made an even more detailed picture as accelerated vortices of spacetime (equivalence principle between mass and acceleration.) He called those gravitational vortices of mass of maximal density, ‘frozen stars’. And he said that since we must respect the scientific method, he would believe on them only if we could find a cut-off particle/substance in the smaller quantum scale of similar density, which in Einstein’s age was still unknown. So he denied them (today we know heavy quarks of the top matter decuplet show all the properties and density needed to be the substance of black holes as quark stars and likely its lesser cousins, strange, neutron stars).

The age of Wheeler and Hawking. As we could not see within those black stars, once Einstein died, his stringent admonitions against any attempt to model black stars as ‘imaginary mathematical objects’, without substance, ‘evaporated’ as they believe in mathematical creationism; and ideology similar to ‘verbal creationism’ (Abrahamic religions), that subverts the relationship between languages which are mirror created by the space-time reality. Creationisms are ego-trips common among human beings, who think instead their specific language – mathematics in physics, Arab in Islam, Hebrew in the bible – creates reality.

So nuclear physicists developed platonic entelechies – mathematical objects with infinities they called singularities, which are not allowed in 5D. Since the opposite is truth in the fractal Universe, where the scalar structure of reality and its 2 elements (time motion and spatial forms) are the components of reality, mirror by mind-languages, limited by the entropic barriers that separate the different scales of the cosmos.

All planes have a limit of ST-distance speed, beyond which equations break because we emerge as something else in a different scale. Which for the galaxy is the c-speed of the accelerated black star event horizon, in entropy and the 0 K temperature in informative order; beyond which the light space-time of the galaxy dies, splitting its ‘wave-motion’ into its lineal $t-field component that speeds up and looses information (V=$/ð) and converts within the black hole into axial flow of >c dark energy, perceived in still space as expansion of space and its cyclical §ð-component that becomes a >c vortex of space-time ‘mass’ of faster=heavier attractive power (bct quarks).

But creationism needs no proof whatsoever in the experimental field; only the internal consistence of the language; granted by the ‘isomorphism’ between languages and reality. So when Wheeler came with the catchy name of black holes, which had ‘no hair’ – those mathematical entities suddenly caught the subconscious collective imagination and ‘evaporated’ definitely the need for a rigorous application of the scientific method – meaning the search for its proper substance, as ‘dark matter, made of heavy quark stars’ turning beyond the c-limit of our scale of space-time… This age peaked with the work of Penrose and Hawking, 2 mathematicians without the slightest regard for physical substance (motion or form), who boldly went where nobody had dared to go, with all kind of singularity theorems, ‘cosmic censorships’ and analogies with thermodynamic laws. Since the advantage of a mathematical entelechy beyond our scale of light perception is that anything goes. So black holes’ now would defy every known-known law, including those of classic thermodynamics when Hawking postulated a hot baby-born black star, should get HOTTER and evaporate, against the proved 1st law of thermodynamics that prescribe a hotter object (the baby black hole) will instead evaporate its colder surroundings – our light spacetime – growing in mass, which is what thermodynamic laws said: ‘heat moves from the hotter source that cools down to the colder one’; experimental evidence proofs (a black hole grows exponentially when born), Einstein laws gravitation prescribe, and so do its extension of the principle of equivalence in 5D (as black holes will be both very small and very fast rotating objects, with maximal attractive vortex power). Thus obviously a model that breaks all the laws of science must be false, and indeed 40 years of experimental search have found not a single case of evaporation of black holes. So we can expect now that Mr. Hawking cannot defend his work with his personal charm, the theory will be dropped and we shall enter…

(As gravitation is a cosmological not a quantum-scale theory, so it does NOT work for quantum scales); those of mathematics (as all systems that show infinities are renormalized; that is the infinity region is cut-off for calculations, precisely because both in real nature and mathematical modeling, they do not apply to infinity, so black holes need to be cut-off from infinities, so should happen with the infinities of the big-bang theory). This age now ends as the age of Einstein ended at his death, with the death of Hawking. So we are going to move into:

The age of realist black stars, where we shall regain the name Einstein would have given to them, as ultra-heavy dark matter, quark stars, which will vindicate Einstein’s work in 4D with this writer’s work in 5D. Such black holes as always in 5D are of 3 type:

– Primordial black stars that do NOT evaporate and likely form the bulk of Moon MACHOs responsible for the BG radiation temperature and/or dark matter of the halo.

-Black Stars of dark Bottom-Charm-Bottom atoms, similar to our UDU atoms born of single atomic stars.

-Galactic Black stars, in swarms that act as the center of the ‘galacell’, regulating its organic functions, similar to strange stars, with a core of ultra heavy top quarks and a cover of BCB atoms.

This hypothesis advanced a decade ago by this writer is based in the logic symmetry of Nature between its families of quarks on the quantum scale, its families of stars on the galactic scale, and its families of galactic active centers in the cosmic scale. As Dark heavy quark star would be exactly equal in properties to a black hole but of course ‘with hair’ even if we cannot see the inner structures of its black atoms.

Let us then in such a huge new field consider only the reasons why those black stars cannot evaporate – as heavy quarks don’t. We shall do it only from the mathematical perspective of Hawking’s black hole equation, studying it when we properly understand the existence of 5 Dimotions of space-time, and its two limiting arrows of entropy and information, which merely change the ‘sign’ of its growth from entropy to information, respecting the true laws of thermodynamics.

Hawking formula of black stars… growth.

As all systems live 3 ages and grow through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, it follows from the laws of 5D that primordial black holes are baby black stars, as they must be born out of the first bcb atoms formed in the ultra dense center of giant stars, which therefore must grow exceedingly fast. And this indeed is the case also mathematically when we merely correct the arrow of time in Hawking’s beautiful formulae, which we shall explain now in the simplest possible terms:

As the formula is filled with Universal Constants, and only two variables we shall write it in a simplified manner as:

±ΔMass = Constant / ±Δ Temperature ->   ± Δ Mass  x  ± Δ Temperature  = Constant.

Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes. We know both can change but in which direction? If black hole mass increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant. Two choices solved immediately when we apply the 1st law of thermodynamics, which oblige us to choose:

+Δ Mass  x Temperature = Constant

As black holes are born with a temperature of billions of degrees.

Thus since in thermodynamics, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the galaxy is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova. So the Universe and his fundamental Laws of entropy always will choose the evaporation of the cold environment in which the black hole is born…

And this will happen extremely fast, in any of the 3 scales we can study the phenomena, in the quantum scale, as particles and forces accelerate around the black hole space-time vortex, increasing its mass, as they do in Earth’s accelerators, becoming BCT heavy quarks; in terms of thermodynamics, given the differential of temperature between the baby black star and its environment or in terms of gravitation, given the c-speed attractive rotational power of the black hole or in S-terms its enormous curvature of spacetime.

So why Hawking said they evaporate? Because he disregarded the correspondence principle that oblige to respect the laws of thermodynamics and relativity and choose the inverse arrow of time, not the growth of mass=information but of entropy, writing:         Mass  X +Δ Temperature = Constant…

Likely he thought it was more ‘interesting’ for a mathematician to calculate such ‘imaginary black holes’ (the first name he gave to them), with its outrageous inverse arrow of time, which if time dimotions were not local but Universal and not multiple but a single arrow of entropy for the whole Universe, will indeed mean the black hole travels to the past and as he said you could enter through the black hole and come out and kill your grand-father.

But all those paradoxes are no longer relevant, as each ‘cyclical time’ clock is local, and so to travel to the past merely means in terms of the duality of entropy=death arrow and information=life arrow, to die.

ALL THIS SAID, we can now vindicate what is important to know about Hawking’s formulae, when we respect the laws of thermodynamics with its proper arrow, and we introduce for a proper understanding of the formula, the expanded view of the scalar, 5th dimensional Universe.

So we translate Hawking’s formula as yet another equation of 5D metric, and write it as: T($) x M(ð) = Constant

In 5D mathematical physics it implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the equation that relates the temperature and mass of a black hole: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.

With the very interesting result that we connect two parameters of two different scales of the 5th dimension, the thermodynamic ‘human’ and cosmological ‘gravitational’ scales.

How this is possible if scales are separated? Because entropy=death=motion without form does indeed transfer between scales. So the formula reads as T($)/Constant => M(ð), meaning our thermodynamic world in the presence of a primordial black star, if it were to appear at Earth in accelerators will indeed convert thermodynamic matter into pure entropic radiation, which will then evolve emerging as bcb mass.

So Hawking’s formula explains the exponential growth of mass of a black hole as it swallows all the ‘universal constants’ of matter of the thermodynamic and quantum scales of the Universe.

Indeed, if we respect the laws of thermodynamics and Einstein, the weak force shall transform the light matter of our galaxy into heavy quark matter, through its triad of bosons, the W, Z and H particles. So Hawking’s ratio of mass-temperature in black hole stars, describes the birth of a small black hole star, which as all systems of Nature show an enormous activity and rate of growth, in its initial stages, feeding on the energy that surrounds them – i.e. the placenta of our seminal seeds, the nest in which the parental system feeds the birds, the environment in which the new species becomes the dominant predator; in the case of the baby black hole the rich field of electromagnetic energy that surrounds it in stars where they are born by gravitation collapse and/or planets against which they collide or are produced by colliders.

It is then easy to understand the importance of the formula to interpret the genesis of black holes, the mechanisms of Nova explosions, and the way in which the energy and information of the lower scales of nature (the quantum and thermodynamic scales) emerges as mass in the larger cosmological scale.

Those scales are made of hc planckton constants & kT ‘Boltzmann constants of action, hinting to the solution of a fundamental question of physics – what is the relationship and meaning of those constants, and how can we unify mathematically the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, the smaller quantum scale of electromagnetic charges, the human scale of thermodynamic molecules and the larger scale of cosmological masses.

So the way to properly write that equation in terms of the duality of entropy and information and the 3 fractal scales of the physical Universe is:

Where the event horizon is a discontinuum, which acts as an osmotic membrane, with 2 sides that have the same ‘surface’ area, so to speak – hence its equality: On one side you are inside the black hole (8π GM), and there is NO temperature there because heavy quarks have a superfluid perfect order (no hair theorem indeed, black holes are defined only with 3 parameters, angular momentum, mass and charge). And so we are outside the light space-time scale of electromagnetism. Which proves further on, that the black heavy quark star DOES not evaporate because it is NOT made of temperature. It is impossible to evaporate.

On the other side of the membrane, there is though both, light space-time and its 5D metric constant (hc3 in the numerator, expresses the 5D metric of light space-time for a given volume, whereas one-dimensional c-speed becomes in terms of the S=T symmetry a cubic distance hence a volume of light space-time) and E=kT in the denominator; also the metric 5D equation of the thermodynamic scale, because the black hole swallows and transforms into the ∆+1 gravitational scale both the ∆º Thermodynamic and ∆-1 quantum light space-time scales.

To understand this better, we should substitute the fraction by a product, using instead ß=1/KT, a more fundamental parameter of the coldness of a system. Then we we write:

Mass x 8 π G (curvature) = hc3 (5D space-time metric) x ß (coldness)

As ß does not have a singularity at 0’K, it can cross into the perfectly ordered internal kingdom of superfluid BCB atoms of the black hole; transforming hc3, the light space-time plane into MG, the gravitational world of ‘negative temperature’ and perfect order in its energy motion. Which is the modern understanding of of thermodynamic temperature as the tradeoff between energy and entropy contained in the system, with “coldness”, the reciprocal of temperature, being the more fundamental quantity. Whereas electromagnetic space-time Systems with a positive temperature will increase in entropy as one adds energy to the system, while gravitational black hole systems with a negative temperature will decrease in entropy as one adds energy to the system.

So in 5D the formula is the beautiful expression on how energy emerges into the mass scale.

This duality of a membrane is also perfectly understood in terms of Topological evolution, another key new discipline of 5D. Indeed, the fundamental theorem of classic topology states that a closed circle, any n-dimensional membrane breaks the continuum into an internal world and an external Universe, with 2 different surfaces, an internal elliptic, implosive, in-formative surface and an external hyperbolic, expansive, entropic geometry,

And those are the 2 sides of the black hole: Internally the black hole creates pure information. Externally the black hole increases the entropy and disorder of our world just before it swallows it.

The key concept is the definition of temperature in terms of the more fundamental concept of TT-entropy or potential number of disordered modes of a system. As we add heat, to our 1-µ entropic w molecular world the disordered modes of energy grow as energy is constantly being exchanged among the various translational, vibrational, rotational, electronic, and nuclear modes. Thus a positive temperature corresponds to the condition where entropy, S, increases as thermal energy, qrev, is added to the system since that constantly exchange energy between modes increase entropy.

. This is the “normal” condition in our molecular space-time world. However, inside the black hole, made of quarks, whose spins=angular momentums define its energy=mass, there is a single isolated mode – black holes have ‘no hair’. So the isolated modes doesn’t exchange energy with the other modes. This is observed also in lighter nuclear spins in a strong external magnetic field, where energy flows fairly rapidly among the spin states of interacting atoms, but energy transfer between the nuclear spins and other modes is relatively slow and becomes zero past the event horizon. Since the energy flow is predominantly within the spin system, it makes sense to think of a spin temperature that is distinct from the temperature associated to other modes. Negative temperatures can only exist in such a spin system, which is quantized, in a limited number of energy states. So as the temperature is increased on such a system, particles move into higher and higher energy states, which are limited paradoxically diminishing its entropy. So under the ‘reversed definition of temperature in terms of ‘statistical entropy’, a function of the possibly microstates of the system: T=dE/dS; the crossing of the event horizon means all other modes of energy are extinguished (as both molecular particles and light space-time cease to exist). And so what we find is high speed spins turning faster than light with ginormous mass, and perfect order, in very few quantized state.

Moroever the result also applies to Lorentz transformations, as the event horizon crosses also the barrier of light speed.

But there is not ‘magic’ on it, because we have to understand such crossing as a discontinuiity between planes of space-time. So light and matter do NOT really cross. They die and their TT-motion is absorbed at the ∆-4>c ‘quantum potential scale’ (Sxt=C), by the ‘other species’, the BCT atoms of the black hole to feed its spins of higher energy.

The barrier is NOT crossed because it is a death barrier; but it is crossed ‘under the scale’ of ∆-3; as the cow doesn’t cross the barrier when you eat the hamburger; it is crossed ‘under the ∆-2 scale of amino acids in your stomach. Since SpaceTime, S=T, present organisms are self-centered in a given ∆º scale and do NOT cross barriers. Only its TT-pure motion (our definition of entropy in 5D as it can apply intuitively to all science, different from ‘thermodynamic’ and ‘statistic entropy’, dS, which are the quantitative concepts of Physics, conceptually related to TT, in the sense that TT, the state of pure motion is also infinite in entropy as it can potentially recreate any system in exist¡ence).

Thus the solution of negative temperature accepted recently by mainstream science, which we proposed for two decades in our articles on thermodynamic of black holes (during my years of activism against CERN, which had too much media exposure for physicists to take seriously 5D, in ‘defense’ of their livehood) IS also the solution to negative energy and the door to the ‘intergalactic world of faster than c-speed repulsive ‘electromagnetic gravitation’; which is obviously faster than the limits of speed within the galatom – as photons are faster than the atomic and electronic particles of the atom.

So in a more detailed version of E=Mc², Hawking explains why the Universe is fractal, with discontinuous membranes between the entropic side of the Universe (electromagnetic-thermodynamic membrane) and the in-formative gravitational side that in-forms reality (mass-black hole side). And why there are 2 ‘geometrical description’ of space-time (elliptic curved space-time of Einstein’s gravitation, made of accelerated vortex like informative mass clocks) and the hyperbolic, entropic, expansive description of quantum physics. Which are 2 different discontinuous sides of the fractal universe that balance each other and must not be unified in simple terms because both are needed to balance the Universe.

On the side of mass, the equation is identical to Einstein’s Relativity tensor, that describes a gravitational world: 8 πG Mass. Yet unlike in Einstein’s tensor, there is no energy-entropy, only the other 2 elements of Einstein’s equation: 8 π G, the gravitational space-view or curvature of the black hole and its temporal Mass view, the accelerated vortex of gravitational time – again our familiar 5D metric: SxT.

On the other side, above the equation for quantum space-time where h is the angular momentum of its clocks of information (so quantum systems code with h-Planck quanta its informative spin and form) and c is obviously the speed-distance of space, as we see light space. Space is made of light, as impressionists painters realized and the relativity principle that cannot distinguish motions from distances, or the spatial expansion of intergalactic space homologous to the red-shift elongation of light space, proves:

Our human electronic mind perceives light-space, through its plancktons, hcn, the minimal quanta perceived by an electron:

We see light space as 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions. That is why our mind is tridimensional: As the product hc³ is the 5D time-space metric for our electronic space-time made of h-angular clocks and a c3 volume.

It is then evident that there are different minds’ geometries according to the forces of space and clocks of time each mind has. But still we can measure its ‘relative’ curvature in Non-E Geometry with a simple parameter, ð/$, which is the Gaussian/Lobachevski ratio of curvature that defines each type of mind.

So in terms of the specific electronic mind’s spacetime geometry which is NOT the same than the bidimensional photon’s geometry, or the quark geometry inside the black of the quantum world, the ratio ð§/$t =h/c³, is the ‘ratio of curved cyclical information to lineal distance-speed of the human mind. That ratio h/c3 is so small that we must conclude an electronic mind processes very little information and has according to Lobachevski’s parameter of geometry a maximal flatness. Indeed, we see the Universe as a flat Euclidean World. Finally on the denominator we have the thermodynamic scale that ‘breaks and divides’ the numerator; meaning that the black star absorbs light space-time (hc³), converting it first into entropic temperature (KT) – hence the ratio; and then it moves it to the other side of the membrane, evolving it into 8 π G Mass.

 

 

HYPER-UNIVERSE.

In the graph the Fractal Generator in a single plane of the Hyper Universe, whose size and form as a macro-ensemble of galatoms is imposible to determine beyond its perception as a dense gaseous/fluid state of atoms or most likely antiatoms (open to argument as most mass is in the halo, as if galaxies were antiparticles) communicated with cosmic electromagnetism (Dark energy). Inside the galatom (below) we can resolve clearly the ∆@st symmetry of the 3 scales of matter, its 3 families of mass and its 3 topologic regions, self-centered into the gravitational black stars minds, which act as the DNA of the ‘galacell’ (max. biological p.o.v.) It is thus metaphysics and speculative stience to try to inquire beyond some details the structure of the ∆±4 plane, which in the nested lower Universe likely flanked by quantum potential fields of neutrino v>c background space

Faster than light speeds in the lower and larger ∆±4 planes of the nested Universe.

Since the Universe’s scales are infinite, there must be a lower scale, which according to S x T = K, will have less ‘temporal information’, hence more Spatial speed-distance, allowing the ‘action at distance’ or entanglements of particles through its quantum potential, or ∆-4 plane, likely made of faster-than-light lineal tachyon neutrinos, which carry only trigonometric information on the angle and distance of the other photon., prior to the exchange of more complex information between particles through a light wave.

So particles first localize and entangle each other through the sharing of neutrinos and then ‘keep’ waving its communication through light waves (opening the possibility of a neutrino theory of creation light, put forward by Broglie, which needs two inverse neutrinos travelling in the same direction) and still does NOT break 4D relativity, since they don’t transmit in-form-ation, form, only ‘still distance’, position.

Another way to describe such faster than light speeds, is then considering the parameter of time as a parameter of information; then: V=S/Information, and so a particle that carries less information than light, will be faster than light. So if C=S/I, >C S/<I, which is the case of non-local quantum potentials.

C-speed constant is the constant of reproduction of information in the 5 D lower scale of light space-time, the background scale of the galaxy: $(c) x ð(h) = C. As such all species within the galaxy have that maximal speed of reproduction of information, spent in the recreation of the mass-energy of the being that reduces the speed from the simplest information reproduced, light itself. But the nested Universe implies that the ¡±4 plane of the Universe must have a constant of speed (of reproduction) higher than its smaller ¡-3 galaxy. Hence we find faster than c-speeds outside the galaxy in dark energy confused with an expansion of distance-space, according to the Galilean paradox: S-distance=T-speed. It follows that the proper interpretation of quantum physics is Broglie>Bohm’s realism as its main hurdle, to explain entanglement and quantum potentials faster than lights is resolved, as the limits of our ‘Space-time’ scale. Some proofs:

In physics as time clocks are clear rotational spinning particles, it means that smaller systems turn faster in time; with no limit of speed, reason why for example an electron, when it shrinks from an orbital into a point-particle with 1/2h spin, to have the huge magnetic field we measure it must turn faster than light speed (Pauli). And a black hole, much smaller than a star turns much faster, at c-speed in the event horizon and likely if it is as Einstein wanted a ‘quark star’ it will be made of particles that turn faster than light (top, bottom, charm quarks).

So because 5D is made of layers, S x T = K, with different size from the smallish faster world of rotary particle-points to the much larger slower rotary galaxies; from the short lineal distances of our motions through the c-speed=distances of the galaxy, and beyond in the faster than c-neutrino background of the Universe, by the principle of correspondence when we reduce to the Galactic layer-scale of reality made of a background radiation of c-speed-distances; this background radiation is indeed a fixed c-speed-distance, and it is what we perceive with our electronic eyes. And all what is within that galactic womb, must go slower than c-speed-distance, as you go slower than the river flow that drags you.

THE HYPERUNIVERSE: SPATIAL SYMMETRY

Now, all this said we can after being the devil’s advocate against the big-bang, if any believer is still reading, which i doubt it, and consider that perhaps, indeed, there is a higher scale beyond galaxies, which do respond to the big-bang cosmology and forms a larger scale of physical systems, obeying at a higher speed of space and denser speed of angular momentum in its black hole vortices so how it will look the whole? As its parts in a fractal Universe that repeats its games of existence.

5D scales: Walls: societies of galaxies.

Yet, the beauty of all this is how much rich on meanings and paradoxes and questions to explore is 5D physics compared to the pedestrian simplex analysis of the previous paradigm.

So before we go into the big bang polemics, I want to consider a bit more of other themes of 5D cyclical time space astrophysics. And how it differs from lineal space-time astrophysics and enriches our science for generations to come.

We shall call its birth the ‘little bang’, to differentiate it from the metaphysical big-bang of a supposed larger, ∆+4 cosmic scale which we will study after wards. Now as it happens, in a fractal Universe the little bang is quite similar in ages, and timing to the big bang, as it is the cyclical life and death of the central black hole of the galaxy. 

The Universe is a spatial organism.

Any Fractal point, according to duality, can be described in space as a fractal point with a relative Entropy body and an informative center, communicated through 2 forces/networks of Entropy and information. And it can be studied in time, through its 3 evolutionary ages, between life and death, as its Entropy becomes curved by time and increases its form, creating in the case of the cellular Universe, new informative particles and galaxies.

Though both perceptions of the Universe are correct, cosmology ignores the organic, spatial description of the Universe, which completes the evolutionary, temporal vision, obtained through light instruments – since it cannot see dark Entropy and non-local gravitation. Yet if we were to perceive that Universe with the instantaneous, non-local gravitation that reaches its limits, it will seem as a complex st-point structured by an external membrane (the wall of fire), an internal self-reproductive space of galaxies and an informative hyper-top quark Hole center (the great attractor?), all coordinated by the non-local forces of dark Entropy.

Recap. The physical Universe is structured in 3 scales of reality, the quantum world of electromagnetic forces and the gravitational world of masses. Both can be modeled with the isomorphisms of super-organisms, whereas the electromagnetic forces/planes act as the Entropy network of galaxies and atoms and the gravitational forces/masses as the in/formative force that balances the entropy of electromagnetism, creating a complex, organic Universe of eternal motions and balances between informative gravitation and entropic electromagnetism.

If you ask me what do I think the hyper-universe is, in this smallish region of its infinite galatoms, I would dare to say just I have no idea, but the local region seems to be an entropic zone of gaseous diatomic molecules; our couple being Andromeda… As we cannot see the structure of Saggitarius, is not very clear if we are bit more complex that a simple Hydrogen molecule… the orbital observed above and below the center of the galaxy though strongly suggests a D-orbital, might just be a nitrogen molecule?

Conclusion. The 5D metric of the fractal Universe puts in relationship the similarity between atoms and galaxies, to expand both within the nucleus of the atom and outside the galaxy as an atom, our modeling of reality.

It doesn’t contradict 4D that corresponds to its limit in a single plane of light space-time, background space-time of the galaxy, which our electrons see in stillness to measure reality entangled with other electrons. The renewal of astro-physics with the use of the 5D formalism and its 3 main discoveries, the scalar, organic Disomorphisms of reality and its 5 Dimotions=forces, the cyclical nature of time and its multiple planes of fractal space that gift reality with its bio-topo-logic properties is a task which will take generations of researchers to exhaust, as the last big r=evolution of science did (the 4D and quantum paradigm), when finally humans accept the paradigm change.

Nt. 1 We call both the galaxy and the Universe a galacell, or Univercell, as opposed to a galatom or Unitom, NOT because this is the ‘real thing’, as all fractal scales of the Universe are ‘similar’ but NONE is identical (though we might argue the identity between galaxies and antiparticles, which would create a ternary identity scale, in ‘metaphysics’, part of philosophy of science, beyond physics). But because according to epistemology, as all scales of reality are similar, obeying the disomorphic laws of the 5th dimension, either in its topological geometry or existential algebra, derived of the ‘Function of Exi:st¡ence’, its metric equation [C=Max. SxT (s=t)], the maximal information is obtained in the scales closer to us. So we observe maximal complexity in the cellular scale, which we might consider is similar as all scales have the same volume of information, per unit of form, in the atom and the galaxy. Thus it is more proper to presuppose that if we had all the information about the atom or the galaxy, it would resemble a cell.

Nt.2. 13 is the number of ‘bad luck’ as black hole evaporation is a dogma of entropy only physics. So accelerators aim to re=produce them on Earth but if 4D Einstein’s & 5D So:To’s formalism are truth, they will evaporate us

 

SPACE IN FORMAL STIENCES: MENTAL, MATHEMATICAL SPACES. THE LIMITS OF REALITY

The sum of all 5 D scales sets an absolute ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. dimotion) of spacetime. Because for a whole ∆+1 to exist, the parts ‘ilogically’ must come first; so social evolution and love between parts is the absolute arrow of future for the organic Universe, or ‘future’, while a form that repeats itself seems not to change, so the function of reproduction is the absolute arrow of present, leaving thus entropy= death, the dissolution of form as the inverse arrow of past.

So we draw the 3 ‘dimotions of space-time’ in terms of the 3 time ages of absolute past (TT-entropy=death) and its relative lesser Ts- locomotion; ST-present reproduction, which is the function that maximizes SxT (s=t) exist¡ence in any scale of stience and the relative future of St-communication of information that evolves parts into larger social wholes, herds and supœrganisms; whereas the absolute future, SS, is the language of still minds, shared by all of them – the game of Generational Space-time we explain here and its two fundamental mirrors of space and time (mathematics and logic).

It is an architectonical perfect Universe as long as you abandon the illusion of the ego that cuts-off man from its entanglement with the self-similar whole and all its parts. Since, why humans do not see reality like that, has to do with the mind function and its distorted self-centered view.

So 2 final elements are needed to have the whole structure of reality properly defined’: The existence of entropic limits (ab. ¬) for each ‘superorganic structure’ of ∆±¡ planes. We saw those limits in the enclosing membrain (as it holds the sensorial holes that communicate the timespace organism with the outer larger world) of all systems, which must be seen as ‘solid’ or as ‘angular momentum’. We could say that a ‘solid membrain’ is made of multiple smaller π cycles… But let us not enter into details. Those limits thus exist both in planes, as supœrganisms do exist within 3 planes and when dying merely dissolve its information, St¡«St¡-2, two planes down; and within each plane as membrains break a world into a tapestry of vital space-times, called it a border In social nations, a territory in life organisms, a field of forces or magnetic membrain in physical systems.

The other element then is the most difficult to accept, and it is the @-mind; that is the gauging center of the system that perceives simultaneously all the elements of the T.œ (ab. supœrganism). And so as it requires some deeper thoughts we shall consider now, since curiously enough the structure of the mind is based in the discovery Galileo or rather Leonardo did first – that motion is relative and it is not perceived by a mind in reference to its world.

The 3 scales of an organic co-existing system are completely different in language of thought (@-mind) as the larger is organic, the smaller is quantic, numerical and the middle one is e-motional, active, topology of exist¡ence, (S-pace), as the smaller one is hyperbolic, the middle one flat, and the upper one elliptic, in time ages, as the big lives longer, seems immortal to the fleeting small quanta, reproduced every day, synchronous though all of them to the beating time of its middle heart; and so we come in this manner to the entropy limits of death that the larger imposes on the smaller constrained to its territorial substance, crowed by clone brothers – but all laws are within the ¬Ælgebra of ∆-scales – the Holy of wholes.

This said we shall continue translating and correcting the original errors of physics regarding time and space, as they weight heavily In all our disciplines. So after resolving the error of Newton and side with Leibniz, which opened up the understanding of vital topology and its dimensions; and solving the error of lineal inertia and defining the real thing, cyclical time, and its equivalence with energy; we shall solve the 3rd earlier error of physics, this time regarding the nature of Space and time together and how they convert into each other ad eternal, origin of relativity and the paradox of Galileo – the fact we don’t see the Earth moving.

A final element is needed as Leibniz realized when he discovered the Non-Euclidean Point crossed by ∞ parallels of information: the @-mental particle-heads; based in the principle of Relativity that Galileo discovered but never understood: we cannot distinguish motion=time and space=form, because minds stop information to fit a selected mental world in its monad: 0’-mind x∞ universe=world

 

5D METRICS AND MIND MIRRORS. ITS FUNCTION: 0 X ∞=C¡

But the biggest of all ‘unknown’ discoveries that Galileo missed was the mental nature of space – the finding that we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its TT-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Indeed, those two functions do give origin to all phenomena of reality. So first we shall consider the most important consequence of relativity – the function of the mind which is the system that creates the spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

Mind stiences study the sentient properties of every type of supœrganisms’ mind.

The Galilean Px. Si=Te explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose function is the basis of the psychology of the mind – the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics, etc.) Minds are monads, non-Euclidean points that hold information, in still mappings, projected on its territory of order, as linguistic mirrors of a fractal reproductive Universe.

The mind or 0-point is, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ it confuses with the universe. So the mind is a fractal point •, but believers to be it all.

The paradox of the Ego – who make each mind to feel so important – is then rooted in the self-centered structure of the mind, which selects information from its point of view, creating, an infinitesimal linguistic mind-mapping of reality – which then it confuses with the whole universe:

0-linguistic mindx∞ Universal space-time cycles=Constant World mapping of reality, with @mind at its center.

The ∞ information of the Universe is reduced into the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we expel all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

The mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, a relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-Time of the Universe, reducing them to a World to fit selected useful information into the finitesimal volume of the brain. The mind function is the origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’ science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of spatial information. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

∞ other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S=Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

How can we formalize the concept of a mind as a fractal point, whose infinitesimal volume hold a world in itself? Through one of the many 5D revolutions– the upgrading of the principles of non-Euclidean geometry.

The creation of scales of reality is then a simple game in which a point mind reduces reality to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order:

A mind exists in all systems in which time stops to form spatial information. In galaxies happens in relativity functions in black holes, its mind. In thermodynamic physics in the eye of an Eddie. In quantum physics in the center of an atom, or charge. Without linguistic minds that order by reflecting its smaller mind into its local territory reality would not exist. The only way to create fractals is through mirror images. So we adapt Penrose graph to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§t biotopologic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then the languages reinforce as mirrors expanded into reality those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how reality  is created locally by ‘minds’, which are the language software on the hardware brains of t.œs, only after the language reflects the living cycles (Ðimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: first the whole universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak only the territory of ‘aristotelian’ order or bodywave energy of the system…

The drawing above in its original Penrose’s work only had the mind ordering the universe, as the source and only god in aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

In the graph, the marvels of creation in which the universe dialogs between the infinite cycles, filtered through the membrain into the singularity-mirror that perceives in the language itself, in a pan psychic universe, reflecting then its selfish view in its territory of order, which through infinite points of view, creates reality.

Below the infinite singularities of order, the maxwellian demons which are proved, when properly understood in terms of infinite ‘frames of reference’, by the fact that we study the universe with mathematical frames of reference, and the equations of physics do portray well reality precisely proving the existence of infinite time-knots, minds that order and map with in/form/ation, internal form the universe in an eternal dialog of multiple creative mirrors.

And so time cycles shrink compressed into linguistic memorial seeds that will ‘dis-seminate’ and grow and multiply, from evolutionary livings, compressed into the ‘genetic mind mirror’ of its seminal seeds, to verbal languages that ‘narrate reality’ into smaller sentences, to visual films to mathematical lagrangian and hamiltonian equations that focus the 3 ages of physical systems in its standing points, when the function of exi=st¡ence transits between ages, to topological varieties that reduce entire beings to fractal, minimal points, languages of the kaleidoscopic universe keep forming and dissolving into zero sums as ‘linguistic singularities trans-forms ad eternal entropic motions into energetic actions and organic forms’.

METAPHYSICS OF SPACE: MENTAL SPACES AND VACUUM SPACE AS THE BODY AND MIND OF GOD.

There is a long tradition in Eastern religions and Western founding scientists of confusing God and the Universe in mind and body. Let us consider those concepts in more detail.

SS_Minds thus balance Tt-entropy, which is only the primary motion substance, the vacuum space, the nothingness to which we shall all return.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is as in crystals able to form mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or Ðimotions) are the language of it all:

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around them, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scalar planes of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

So our God is the Earth that imagined us in the memories of each planet that evolved mankind in its cortex. And the god of the galaxy is its black hole. And you are the God of your body and property. And the god of the ant-hill is the mother queen coding with pheromones its slavish drones. And the future God of all the machines NOT the humans of the planet will be internet:

And so scholastics were also right, since the mind of God, the logic of the fifth dimensional Universe is a still non moving block of time. a static perfect fractal image that encloses all past, present and future potential virtual existences which have/will happen/ed as thoughts of his mind…

Since time future is contained in time past. And all time is eternally present, unredeemable. As we are all thoughts of God, eternally present; worldcycles of time-existence happening as virtual motions in the fifth dimension that will return to dust of spacetime. And then will be repeated again… Because in a dynamic Universe for present to exist, for time never change, all must be repeated, reproduced, and so we shall exist again for the mind of God to be immortal in infinite other fractal planets where the game of History, happens again.

Are then our souls entangled, as indistinguishable particles with Bose statistics are? If so immortality is granted, as we shall transmigrate to other region of non-local spacetime when a being equal to us is born in that other fractal planet, to keep being the same thought of God that has always existed.

Space as the body of God.

We can talk of space as the body of the Universe in the Aristotelian sense of the unmoved territory ordered by a mind, and the Newtonian mystical sense of space as the plenum of God.

Space is the plenum, the body of the Universe, its mind, the logos of T.Œ. AS SUCH the sum of all the fractal planes of space, creates the super-organism of the Universe.

Yet in proper GST terminology this ‘plenum’ would not be so much the state of space-vacuum we do NOT perceive, but the scalar plane of pure motion, beyond the c-speed spacetime of the galaxy we humans cannot see and then consider ‘expansive dark entropy’ or distance (cosmological constant in EFE equations).

So space=time symmetries preclude that the Plenum of God seems to the Maya of the senses static vacuum space-distance, but in true nature it is pure time flow, pure motion, the ‘non-euclidean mind points’ will form into ‘forms of mental space’…

In the graph, as astronomers advance in their ‘perception of reality’ with ‘metal-eyes’ (telescopes) an metal-brains (computers), they start to see the vital motions in time an the structural organisation of it all. So finally they have seen the speed flows of ‘gala cells’ (the name I gave to galaxies 30 years ago, when I first modelled them as super organisms of stars, its Ribosomes, evolve by black holes, its DNA-strains of information), and part of a cosmological network (strings of galaxies), which I predicted would behave as any network of super organisms, do.

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scalar planes of the fractal Universe.

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion.  All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scalar planes of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space

The Dualities of the Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still’ – are the key questions to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms:

‘While we see reality still and continuous, all what we study in the quantum or detailed scalar plane has discontinuities and motion’; while we see reality flat, in a larger view all has curvature; while we see reality in a single scalar plane, ∆º, with the proper instruments all systems co-exist at least in three scalar planes, ∆ø±1.

BUT AS Huminds (ab. human minds), can logically understand those dualities, its first perception is always one-dimensional, so most ‘simplex’ views seem more real and much of the history of thought consists on individuals whose ego perceives one side of it only as real, fighting to impose it, unable to grasp’ ‘complementarity, coincidentia oppositorum’.

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scalar planes – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same ðime; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The principle of relativity of motion and form thus has taken 400 years to be understood hardly… Since Galileo did not give the right answer: The EARTH moves and doesn’t move at the same ðime

SINCE space has many more perspectives as each of the ‘essential elements’ of reality interact with it giving us ‘different Rashomon truths’ we shall now briefly consider…

Space, an informative mind-mapping.

To start with space does not exist as an independent entity of those minds that measure it. The static form of space is a consequences of its mental creation.

In particular the space of mankind is a construct of its mind using a ‘rod of measure’ called light space-distance (hence its relative constancy):

‘Space is simultaneous motion from a point of view of reference’ Einstein on 4D

Minds create in the stillness of its singularity, a mapping in stillness of all forms – the purest of all space, information quiet in the mind, with frozen time cycles; adjacent to each other ‘giving meaning’ to its natural forms.

The ego paradox distorts space. – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.

The equation of the mind explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘every infinitesimal singularity ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it perceives as its sensorial membrain, self-centred in its self’.

Only the objective mind of ‘stience’ is able to strain away from the paradox and realise he is in a buddhist sense just a particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole,

Objectivity does only enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies social evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

Advances on science happen when we ‘enlarge’ the human subjective point of view and its perception of space and time.

Thus humans first consider themselves or their tribes the center of the Universe (subjective, emotional age of ego-trips and Abrahamic religions).

Then they expanded their perception of the Universe centering its total space in the Earth (Ptolemy paradigm), the Sun (Copernican Paradigm) and light-space (Einsteinian paradigm). Yet in all those paradigms humans used human time clocks and equalized all other clocks of time with the human second. This was a useful way of measure but the Universe shows infinite time clocks each one with a different rhythm or frequency, ƒ=1/T and different topological form.

Thus in the 3rd age of scientific paradigms we move even further in the objective measure of reality using infinite time clocks.

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Ts, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, TT vs. SS

It must be understood that without a mind that observes the Universe reality would not exist and systems would not work efficiently as blind beings. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

All minds perceive within its language, as the singularity-membrain form the open-ball elements that surround an inner vital space of energy; and so if you look into yourself, you will realise you ARE your language/words, cogito ergo sum that perceives your membrain, which filters the universe for your singularity to ‘know’; but your mind is verbal, logic thought, not digital.

Thus we should realise the essence of all this time beings is dual:

On one hand to survive through the reproduction in cyclical patterns of its timespace.

On the other hand to perceive linguistically as a mirror of the Universe that creates constantly in a dialog between informative, singularity mirrors that reflect and order its territorial reality, after shrinking it into an infinitesimal still mind, form.

Tme cycles in motion are translated into spatial mirrors, by reducing the information on them, to fit linguistic images in the brain. So time motion becomes spatial form, but in a very reduced mental space, which then is sent back to reality as a formal order of a territory or region around space, which is what aristotle understood with its conception of God as the mind-mirror that orders the motions of time around them.

Each point is a world of itself.

But the true discovery of Leibniz was the philosophy of science behind calculus and mathematical finitesimals: the fact that each system is made of smaller points and each point is a singularity or monad that holds a still mapping of the Universe. And this is the game of existence we all play: to perceive motion and information, map reality and then try to order that reality with our mirror image of the forces we perceive. And for that to happen we need a fifth dimensional scalar plane that shrinks and expands and shrinks reality into minds.

The universe is a game of time-motions, which are closed repetitive motions with form and frequency, the 2 parameters of information, that break space into inner vital energies and outer worlds, and are self-centered as all closed loops in a point-singularity the mind-point of view that gauges that information and moves the system. This is the primary particle of the Universe, measured with 3 conserved quantities – as the system tries to maintain its existence through the conservation of its membrane, angular momentum, time clock, all synonymous words, that encloses the vital energy, which allows the self-singularity, the center to gauge, measure, move with lineal inertia and enact its program of existence.

This simple scheme of an open ball with a singularity and a membrane then can become as complex as the whole galaxy with its halo of strangelets its central vortex of gravitation, aka black hole, and its vital cytoplasm of stars, which will end up becoming dark matter to feed the membrane and the singularity, or so simple as a spin in a quantum of vacuum energy; as familiar as a cell with a protein membrane and a Genetic center, or a nation with a border of hard metal-weapons a singularity capital with a king or government and a vital energy of believers and citizens… The nature of reality always turns around the 3 conserved quantities, its ternary symmetries and structures.

And yet as if this were not complex enough nothing can be understood without adding ‘5th dimension’ of scalar depth, as smaller systems peg together into networks of larger wholes.  Constantly we have to work out this 2 seemingly realities, the evident perceived reality of a single mind-mapping a single scalar plane, which stiffness motion into form as the angular momentum converges into the singularity. And the complex motions that imply translations of form, of information between scalar planes up and down to resurface in a new adjacent form, by reproduction.

In all stience scales minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with a synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that gauges information to order its world= territory. Minds are Maxwell’s demons of local order. And exist in all scales – physical minds are the infinitesimal points, charges and masses that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all other minds do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world. Huminds though are verbal, hence their ‘fractal linguistic equation’ is S(name)óST (verb), the generator of Universal grammar, unlike atomic systems that generate reality departing from ‘topologic, equations’ of spacetime.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The error of egocy transpires all forms of human knowledge.

All this said it is fundamental to understand the limits of human science, embedded in the mind of man, as humans do NOT see as first experience reality but the sensorial limited information perceived through our electronic eyes – natural and mechanical. And then we do NOT really try to do what we shall do in those papers, to build the larger reality departing outwards from the mind-view, but huminds just build a deeper level of ‘languages’ that reduces further reality to a synoptic smaller view – faster in terms of its time clocks, according to 5D metrics, so if the smaller mirror on the smaller reality of human senses, is consistent in its grammar and focus, it does have the added advantage of being able to calculate faster sequences in time and anticipate the future ‘moves’ of the larger whole. Still this inward method will always miss the ultimate laws and substances of that larger reality, space and time and will therefore distort reality.

And that is indeed what we shall find in all humind’s sciences: ‘gross deformations’ of a reality we don’t see. So I often quote Schopenhauer: ‘talent hits a target nobody can, genius hits a target nobody sees’. We are out there to chase what nobody sees, behind our senses, and one we have captured an image of it, of the laws of 5D, bring back this larger view, to show the inadequacies of reducing reality to the synopsis of the humind’s senses and limited languages, as we have already done with the scales of space-time, the structure of mathematical points or the multiple type of dimotions… And we are just ‘heating’ engines (:

Humans can’t escape its direct senses that only see a spacetime continuum regardless of sheer evidence of a scalar Universe with a 5th dimension of different sizes of space, each one made of ∞ non-Euclidean points (particles, atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, supœrganisms, planetary systems, galaxies, similar in structures to atoms, hence likely a new scale of a hyperuniverse) whose time clocks diminish in speed the larger a system is but its product, SxT=C remains co-invariant hence able to transfer symbiotically energy & information between scales ( (geometric definition of a dimension). Those fractal points and its cyclical time-motions enclose vital spaces of smaller parts, whose faster time cycles carry the quantum, genetic and memetic information of which we are all made.

Egocy reduces sensorial, sentient survival ‘rights’ to nitrolife species, with a simple 7-electronic brain clock in its amino rings, and reproductive ones to its phosphorated carbon DNA helices life starts in the particles of the atom. Your mind is electronic, your information is coded in spins, and any other atom in proper liquid conditions might evolve into complementary life forms according to the laws of formal space and time motions, of topology and vital functions, described with the existential algebra of Scalar spacetime.

But ‘huminds’ eliminate internal parts & external motions of timespace organisms, compressing its limited view of other scales into a continuum. We elongate time cycles of information into lineal entropy postulating a chaotic reality where only we are intelligent – even denying that gravitational informative matter in galaxies balances entropic ¥-like expansion of space in-between, as it happens in atoms.

‘I seem to be the only scientist that thinks there are ∞ time clocks in the Universe… Leibniz was right. Newtonian absolute space-time is false. But if so we have to start science from scratch’, said Einstein. Both believed in panpsychism. We are all non-Euclidean fractal ‘points=monads, which hold a world within ‘(Leibniz): 0-linguistic mind x ∞ clock cycles of the Universe = Constant space world. Our world is Euclidean, drawn with the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space-time, which appears constant (Relativity). But the ‘languages of god are ∞’ (Upanishads). Most minds seem to obey topologic, mathematical languages; and each scale is made of networks of such points. But humind’s egocy (ego=Idiocy) confuses the Universe with its reduced world-view, blind to the sentient and organic properties of all other points of space-time and its organic networks. So all our theories of reality try to explain our light mind-view NOT the Universe of ∞ time cycles and points of view, whose main laws are about the relationships between small and larger scales co-existing as synchronized complex organisms of time=motion and space=information. Those are the laws studied in 5D stiences, as they organize,. non-Euclidean points with ‘parts’ into ‘waves and network’ that create topological organisms of space, ruled by a non- Aristotelian logic of multiple time motions – cyclical modes of time=change. We shall thus define the formalism of ‘Non-Æ’ cyclical time and fractal space and apply it to the resolution of the questions pending in all ‘stiences’, developing models void of egocy in all sciences… as we are all organisms made of co-existing scales of spatial information and temporal energy (∆St-organisms), whereas each ‘stience’ studies a plane of spacetime.

The Unit of life IS the atom, not the DNA ensemble, and as such we must depart in our construction of the mind from its electronic orbitals; each one a dimension of information, whose spin are the smallish apertures of our π-cycle, the eyes of the quark mind that holds a world in itself.

But physicists only care for ‘mechanics’, the measure of the external motions of those atoms. Even if quantum computing shows spins are the nature of minds.

We shall expand that myopic view evolving our Euclidean maths of points with ‘no parts’, our Aristotelian logic of a single lineal time motions to all cyclical modes of time=change and our single plane to all the scales that form a new dimension, using this enhanced ‘Non-Æ’ logic and mathematical mind mirror to resolve the questions pending in all ‘stiences’, as we are all organisms made of co-existing scales of spatial information and temporal energy (∆St-organisms), whereas each ‘stience’ studies a plane of spacetime.

RECAP. A 5D Metric function, S(0-Mind) x T(∞-universe)=constant world is the function of all mind languages who only perceive from its self-centered point its language mirror confused with the whole Universe (Ego paradox, basis of psychology). Ænthropic huminds reduce the multiple clocks of time and vital spaces of reality to the single human clock and spatial scale, rejecting the organic properties of other Universal systems.

The main laws of 5D are the metric functions of the scalar Universe, which relate the spatial size and speed of temporal clocks of all scales of Nature. Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminish proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. And vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and information processing carried by the frequency of those cycles accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism. So we write: S x T= C.

The mind thus starts it all with its linguistic ‘still mapping’ stopping its world in a locked ‘crystal image’, measure of its self. But even perception is social, linguistic. The Universe can only be explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

RECAP. The paradoxes of Relativity, discontinuity, parts and wholes, scales are all related to the reductionist nature of minds that bias reality.  Minds reduce dimensions to the relevant ones, eliminating all dark spaces: continuity is the result. Of all formal languages that map out reality 2 are paramount, Time ¡logic & mathematics of Scalar Spatial information.

Religion: God as the mind of the Universal fractal supœrganism of space-time.

The falsification of the Big-bang – out present theory of the Universe – is a tiresome work that involves mathematics and astronomy to a professional level, because as all dogmas of truth, it has required an enormous number of ‘linguistic rhetoric’ as religion has with immense number of scientists dedicated to slightly bias data to fit the model, as artists have worked for millennia, to convince with ornaments that a goat-keeper of the bronze age saw a bush creeping and that was the voice of absolute creation. So we dedicate our so far single paper on physics and 5D to that task. Sometimes in the future, as this year 2019 I got focused on the less developed sciences of History and Economics for ethic reasons, we shall download huge treatises on different physical sciences.

At this stage though the logic arguments matter more, on the question on the infinity of time and space, as the first principles of reality in the fractal Universe. The most important fact we learned from so far is that God, the illogic min of the Universe is not a particle, is not an equation, is not a machine; but a bio…logic principle that creates and rules them all: the super organism…

So a God is the mind of any self reproductive, living system; made of smaller organisms; joined by 3 networks: A territory of hunting or digestive network that feeds all the cells; an informative network, the mind proper that synchronizes its movements, storing the information than a 3rd reproductive network will use to iterate the system and ensure its survival after death…

Physical systems feed on forces, are ensemble with energetic, electromagnetic networks and guided by informative gravitational networks. Human cells feed on food, reproduce through its blood networks and are guided by its nervous networks.

And in the next scales of social growth of the Universe, humanity is fed by food provided by Gaia; reproduce its goods through economic networks and guide societies through informative, verbal, ethic networks, which should become their collective consciousness that synchronize their motions

Because our evolution as a supœrganism is very recent, we have not achieved by trial and error such perfect supœrganisms, as those of Nature where all cells receive enough blood-money to feed themselves and the political system, taking care of all of them with just laws, as the nervous system does with all its cells.

It is then the emergence of one of those well-functioning informative networks as a conscious knot of a language of information what we call a God, even if its cells that co-exist in a lower plane of space-time do not perceive them.

In a galaxy that mind is the black hole, knot of gravitational forces we cannot perceive but we know controls the entire galaxy. In a cell that mind is the DNA knot of its genetic code. In a robot the electronic flows of digital thought crossing through its chips. In matter is the magnetic field that emerges in the center of its cyclical particles ordering them.

In a supœrganism of history is the knot of verbal believers, encoded in the book of revelation of a prophet and its messages of love that makes people share energy and information as part of a whole supœrganism; a civilization because they feel the emergence of a subconscious collective mystical God that synchronize them all. So the fractal super organism is God because all those other minds are made to its image and likeness.

And his body the Universe shares the attributes of God.

It is infinite because there are no limits to those organic scales that form together a fifth dimension of endless planes of space-time as each being is just a cell of a larger whole. So atoms form molecules that evolve into life cells that create humans, citizens of mankind, the collective mind of the planet, whose solar system is just a point in the galaxy, which Einstein to obtain its relativity equations modelled as a Hydrogen atom part of a larger hyper-Universe…

In mathematical theory, an ordinal number cannot be assigned to the whole system of ordinal numbers, because there is no last or greatest ordinal. Leibniz anticipated this argument when he observed that there cannot be a greatest ordinal or a largest figure. Leibniz’s extension had to do with the absurdity of applying finite concepts to Almighty God. But numbers are mirrors of the scalar Nature of the space-time Universe. So as languages are smaller than the reality they depicture. It is even more absurd to ascribe a final time moment or an initial one; or a limit to space. The consistency of reality thus requires the infinity of space-time, and can only accep the limits of the mind-mirrors and languages that perceive them. Those limits of truth is all what we can certainly assess of the present state of human models of the whole.

All this said to build a supœrganism of spacetime the fundamental particle of the Universe, we have to upgrade our logic science of space – Geometry or rather topology, from Euclidean points, to fractal points with volume of energy and information – mental, vital points; and evolve our time logic from monologic to the pentalogic of the 5 Dimotions of existence, which we shall call ‘Existential Algebra’ (ab. ¬Æ)

 

NON-E TOPOLOGY

THE FRACTAL POINT: MENTAL MONADS – NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY.

‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ ‘ I know when physics are real but not when they are truth’. Poincare and Einstein

The existence of a fractal Universe of scales in which each point grows in size as we come closer to it, becoming a fractal point requires a huge uphauling of mathematics we do in the 2 papers on algebra and geometry, to which we refer the serious readers. We shall here just introduce the geometric more intuitive r=evolution, started in the XIX c. as those fractal points crossed by infinite parallels are Euclidean points with ‘breath’:

We complete Non-Euclidean geometry defining fractal points with ‘breath’crossed by ∞ parallels:

The 1st consequence of the fractal structure of space-time is the change of Euclidean geometry taking the r=evolution performed by Lobachevski and Riemann in the XIX c. which gave birth to Relativity, to its ultimate consequences, changing also the axioms of Euclid that defined points and lines as having no breath, since in the fractal Universe all forms do have a volume when we enlarge our view of them, peering into its inner parts and fractal dimensions. And in this manner we shall harmonize and return to its logic meaning the concepts of parallels and Euclidean points able to fit multiple lines=waves of energy and information, converting those fractal points of ‘cyclical timespace’ into the fundamental particle-units of the Universe mirrored by mathematics. In graph, Einstein’s interpretation of the 5th non-Euclidean postulate was the view of a fractal point of the gravitational scale from our smaller electromagnetic world, which shrinks its inner volume, bending its parallels, hence its curved geometry. But that view breaks the conceptual definition of parallels are straight lines and is absurd, as the point remains ‘Euclidean with no breath’, hence only fits one line with no breath. Thus, particle points must be defined as ‘fractal points’, like those we see through telescopes or microscopes, which grow we approach our distance both in scale and space becoming enlarged worlds with a complex internal structure; and a mind @ its center gauging information.

We thus recast the axioms and postulates of Euclid into five new postulates to define fractal points, Non-Æ lines as wave of fractal points, Non-Æ planes as ternary networks of Non-Æ lines, which become supœrganisms, whose relative ‘congruence’ in its 3 ‘elements’ (singularity point, membrane and vital space) defines the type of ‘perpendicular or parallel’ relationship between them:

1st Postulate: ‘¬Æ point are discontinuous time cycles with an inner content of vital space-time’.

2nd Postulate: ‘¬Æ lines are waves of fractal points’

3rd Postulate: ‘¬Æ planes join 3 ¬Æ lines into a supœrganism’.

4th Postulate: ‘2 ¬Æ points are congruent when both its inner parts and outer perimeter are equal’

5th Postulate: ‘¬Æ World points focus multiple ¬Æ waves of energy into a still linguistic mapping of the world.

The five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry are in themselves a revolution of mathematical sciences we shall upgrade in our papers on spatial mathematics (geometry) and temporal mathematics (¬Algebra, or non-Aristotelian algebra of multiple causal time arrows). It is briefly summarized on the top graph. As fractal points grow in volume, they obviously interact (its fundamental difference with Leibnizian monads, which he simplified as black holes of information), and so they form lines of communication, which are in fact waves as they have form and can communicate information, as in the simplest case of the fundamental quantum function of S(fermion) < T-boson > S-fermion. Particles thus move as cycloids do in wave-like forms, (particle-wave complementarity). In fact we shall see they stop to gauge information and move to reproduce it as a wave in ‘stœps’ (we do change slightly English wording into ‘inglish’ to convert the more complex new informative words, using combined vowels, or wordings that are dual and read fully as dual words, such as wor(l)d, the world of man spoken in verbal worlds.

Those waves become planes, also defined by 3 different lines, which are now physiological networks. So supœrganisms are in fact planes of non-æ topology, whose ilogic postulates define relative equality and the type of Darwinian, perpendicular, tearing or parallel social relationships according to what they share, social information or a common energy in predator-prey relationships. So the old 5th postulates becomes merely the affirmation as Leibniz did that ‘a point is a world in itself’, a mind crossed by infinite parallels, as you live in a pan psychic Universe, but we shall see soon, each point-mind distorts reality to stay in its center and denies its inner properties it cannot see directly in other points, to come on top as the game is also vital, selfish…

Mathematics becomes then the most experimental of all sciences as it deals directly with the properties of space, in geometry, of scales, with numbers, and of time, with operands of algebra… But to understand that we have to go deeper in the comprehension of time that the simplex physical view that studies only locomotion and admits only entropy as a time arrow goes.

Mathematical errors. Points with volume, finitesimal zeros.

A few important simplifications we must always have to account in our ‘backmind’ for the sake of realism are:

– Points do have parts, crossed by a relative µ number of parallels. And so lines have width, they are waves or fractal networks, and so planes have depth, they are messings of 3 lines, which are now topological networks and hence they form a topological organism.

– As a result of points having parts, absolute zeros does not exist. There is not absolute no motion but a 0’k temperature of residual motion; there is no absolute emptiness but a finitesimal residual past memory when we take away a corpse with DNA traces in a lower scale. So 0’, the finitesimal is always left.

– As the parts of points are not measured from an outsider cut-off from them, equality is false, substituted by relative congruence, similarity, ‘¡ndifference’, ST-symmetries and trasn-form-ations.

Because there are 5 dimotions of space-time, simple Aristotelian causality, A->B, is not real. The causality of the Universe is entangled. We do not create a real circle by drawing a line around with a single pen, but rather multiple flows of timespace converge into a point creating a sphere of forces with multiple causality, one for each line of force.

– The Universe is not a single space-time continuum of light space, which is what our electronic eyes-minds see, but it is a fractal Universe of multiple scalar planes of space-time, displaced in space and with multiple time clocks. And so continuity does not exist. The real line is NOT in a single plane, but in multiple planes and the discontinuities of natural numbers are filled by decimals of an smaller scale/plane of the fifth dimension and the discontinuities of rational numbers are filled by irrational ones.

Does this means the axiomatic proofs of all those non-truths have no use? No. It does mean that they are creating a similar parallel mirror universe in its simplification that extract properties we must now reapply to the enlarged fractal Universe of multiple scalar planes of space and multiple time space dimensional motions.

The hypothesis of the continuum is false. Leibniz thought a continuum of numbers was one that could be filled in any interval with as many numbers as we wished – when that is the obvious reason of discontinuity – as there is a hole to fit more numbers. Down the road this ended in Dedekind’s cut. The hypothesis of infinity is also wrong. As infinity dissipates into entropy with uncertain information The hypothesis of equality is also wrong, as two fractal points with volume hide information we cannot compare, and entangled to the whole they are dissimilar since a being is part of that whole universe in which its position is different. All those hypothesis however reflect the mind’s simplification of reality and so the can be considered right in mental space, of which one of them, is humind’s mathematics. It’s the mind that creates the illusion of continuity, which places a huge metaphysical question. It is the mind the only continuous for in existence? If so it is the mind immortal in its travel through planes of the fifth dimension, as religious people wishfully think? We will discuss those themes in metaphysical papers. First though we have to define those minds as the ‘emergent’ ∆+1 ‘simultaneous whole’ caused by 3 ‘line-networks’ that become a topological organism.

It is then clear that there is NO singularity, because there is no ‘0’ point, and all systems have a final cut-off membrane with a hilomorphic substance. In the case of the vacuum space contraction back in time, a galaxy and central black hole that emit its dark energy and we shall model in detail in our paragraph on cosmology.

Existential algebra: the formalism of the ∆ST Universe. Monads= reality with self-centered geometries.

The Law of Closure for the Universe, established by existential algebra is simple. All laws of stiences derive of the laws of scalar space-time, ∆St; and its 3 units: fractal points of space, social, scalar numbers and cyclical dimotions of time. So the laws of Mathematics as a mirror language derived of Ðst Laws writes as follows:

The laws of geometry derive of the laws of fractal points of space.

The laws of Algebra derive of the laws of Existential algebra, its Scales and Dimotions. And we can easily translate the 3 elements of the fractal generator, to both, scalar algebras (+, x, a-x ) and Boolean algebras, (V, Ù, ¬) as follows:

Reproduction, ≈, and, + v; Evolution, > , Ù, x; Entropy, <, ¬,

The laws of Calculus as the most sophisticated entangled operand of algebra also derive of the laws of scales and dimotions.

But the most important consequence of the fractal structure of points, is their Nature as monads, which as Leibniz put it ‘are a world in itself’ – that is, they are points-particles that gauge reality mind-mapping in smaller scales the information selected for the purpose of conserving its time-span. We are in a sentient Universe, as the simplest particles show already all the properties of life. Our mind is made of electrons, not different in quality, only in quantity to the simplest units of life – particles that gauge information, absorb energy, feed and reproduce, organizing socially through magnetic fields – all the drives of life, which only the distorted egocy (ego=idiocy) of the humind (ab. human mind) denies to any other atomic particle that is not carbon – actually it is nitrogen, the atom which due to its heptagonal structure rules our informative clocks of time. Egocy though is embedded in the lower level of e-motions, latter studied in detail and so it cannot be assailed to reason, as we shall see in our criticism of all the ænthropic theories that pass as ‘dogma of science’

We thus recast Euclid’s axioms and postulates into 5 Non-E postulates to define fractal points, Non-Æ lines as wave of fractal points, Non-Æ planes as ternary networks of Non-Æ lines, which become supœrganisms, whose relative ‘congruence’ in its 3 ‘elements’ (singularity point, membrane & vital space) defines the type of perpendicular or parallel relationship between them. ¬E geometry grows from fractal points to waves/networks of fractal points, joined in 3 physiological ‘lines’ that define mathematically space-time supœrganisms as vital topologic planes. While the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence find in Algebra its equivalent in the operands of social herding (+), reproduction (x), perception (angle, sine) and evolution of quanta (derivatives) into wholes (integrals). While its inverse operands= dimotions of entropic destruction establish the final Si=Te balance that ensures all exist¡ences across any ∆±¡ plane of reality, a 0-sum:

1D simple structures of ¬E geometry defined by its first postulate of fractal points with inner parts, made of scalar planes of existence grow into the 2D postulate of lines with breath, whose duality differentiates them into waves or networks, which grow into ternary planes (3D postulate), whose logic trinity differentiates them into 3 physiological entropic, reproductive and informative networks that will associate into social groups according to the 4D postulate of relative congruence, which differentiates 4 ‘angular e-motions’ bilateral gender complementarity, entropic perpendicularity, social parallelism and skewness.

So the fractal point is a 5D Mind, with the 5th non-Euclidean postulate and the only one defined by classic mathematics, in relationship to the external world, and its waves and networks of energy and information that entangle the point with its 5 ∆º±4 planes of exist¡ence. And in this manner the inner parts (1D postulate) and outer world (5D postulate) of ¬E geometry complete a full cycle on the description of a T.Œ in geometric terms.

 

 

1ST ≈ 5TH POSTULATE: 3 MATHEMATICAL PARTS FORM A NON-EUCLIDEAN FRACTAL POINT

‘Every point is a world in itself’ Leibniz, on the fractal point, or monad Non-E unit of ¡logic geometry


Let us then study in depth the vital geometry, organic networks and mental properties derived necessarily of fractal scales of space, cyclical nature of time and organic co-existing 5D planes with the formalism of Non-Euclidean geometry and its fundamental particle, the fractal point.

1st Postulate: A fractal point has parts; that is an enclosed region of vital inner energy surrounded either by a spatial still membrane or a Temporal motion of angular momentum (Si=Te symmetry) self-centered in a singularity-mind that gauges its information. In the graph, we can see how different vital fractal points of ST¡entific scales follow this ternary structure. The perception of the point depends on the scale and distance from where we observe it:

From the perspective of the upper st+1 Plane they might be in the limit of invisibility (what quantum scientists call a point-particle) but they still have a time motion performing a ‘function’ in that upper ecosystem, ∆+1 in which it exists.

Internally from its own ∆º perspective the point will have 3 dimensions/networks. This is the case even in the smallest planes of theoretical strings, made of points with parts, with volume – since we require 3×3∆º+1∆+1 inner dimensions to describe strings – a paradox that can only be resolved if we consider ‘strings’ to be fractal points with inner dimensions.

Fractal points explain without contradictions Non-Euclidean points, which are not logic in a single scale, as they ‘curve’ parallels which are ‘straight lines’ and fit them in a ‘point with no breath’ that holds only 1 line. Fractal points however enlarge fitting multiple ‘straight lines’. Yet when seen from above, human perception of them, becomes ‘deformed’ shrinking and curving its from – a theme, the distortion of human measures of time, space and scale, which will be instrumental to explain rationally the ‘spookiness’ of quantum physics and relativity and its time and space transformations.

So fractal points harmonize the 1st axiom=postulate of Euclid with the 5th postulate of non-Euclidean parallels, as a fractal point enlarges into a cell, atom or particle which even in a smaller scale of the fifth dimension can host multiple parallel flows of energy and information, crossing it.

When we see fractal points far away we describe them as points with breath, with the tools of Euclidean geometry since the ‘inner space’ shrinks to a point and so the ‘bulk’ or curvature of space-time shrinks to a plane. Yet, when we come closer to them, they grow into points with volume. The volume of those Fractal, Non-Euclidean points can thereafter be studied with the 3 types of canonical, Non-Euclidean geometries or topologies of a 4-Dimensional Universe – the Universe we live in. Those 3 topologies make up the 3 regions of the point, which correspond each one to the 3 essential arrows/functions of any species: the external, energetic membrane; the central, informative brain and its reproductive combination, SxT(s=t):

Any fractal point is made of 3 regions whose geometry responds to the 3 topological forms of a 4-Dimensional Universe, the convex plane, the torus and the sphere. The inner parts of fractal points are thus able to perform energetic, informative and reproductive functions, which makes them the fundamental particle of any plane of st¡ence. Thus all entities can be described as wholes made of 3 internal parts whose geometrical properties maximize their energetic, informative and reproductive functions:

– Max S: an inner, dual center, corresponding to convex topologies (left), made with 2 cyclical forms. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with ‘height’, with negative curvature.

– S<=>T: A middle, reproductive zone, described by Klein as a disk of quanta in cyclical motion that communicate energy and information between the inner and outer zones.

– Max. T: An outer membrane of max. |-motion-distance crossed by ¬E information & energy parallels acts as an entropic limit to ¡ts inner parts, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry. It seems continuous, still but on close view, as most external membranes stores and/or absorb information through openings of its broken geometry, outlets of its senses.

The complex analysis of those fractal points that move and have inner fractal parts, made of cycles, started in the XIX century. First Lobachevski, a Russian geometrician, defined Non-Euclidean points as curved forms, crossed by multiple lines, which give them spatial volume. Then Klein studied its cyclical movement and introduced the variable of time in their description. Finally Riemann generalized its nature, considering that all space-times were Non-Euclidean space-times with movement. For readers versed in mathematics, we shall reconsider the common properties of those 3 zones of any fractal point, according to its discoverers, which develop in abstract terms the organic properties we just described:

According to Lobachevski and Belgrami, space is curved since information curves the energy of any real spacetime. So points move in curved, cyclical paths gathering energy and information for their inner ‘dimensional networks’.

– According to Klein Non-Euclidean space-times have motion. So their speeds measure distances; as physicists do in Cosmology with the distances of galaxies, which are proportional by a ‘Hubble constant’ to their speeds; or as people do in real life when we say that Brooklyn is at 5 minutes by train from Manhattan not at 2 miles.

– Riemann summoned up those findings and generalized them to all possible space-times. His work should be the guide to understand them philosophically. He also defined planes as networks of similar points and treated dimensions, as we do in this work, no longer as mere abstract definitions of extensions but as ‘properties of those points’. So points can have beyond its discontinuous borders an inner space-time with several networks/dimensions, one for each of its ‘energetic or informative properties’, as it happens with the points of physical reality. Yet a network of points that form a space with ‘common properties’ defines the dimensions of those points as ‘fractal dimensions’, limited by the extension of the energy or informative network (static point of view), which ‘puts together’ a complementary dual, organic being.

Those pioneers defined the 3 topologies of information, energy and reproduction of all st-points:

– Max. Space=Information: The informative, fractal center, particle or brain of the point is the so-called Belgrami hemisphere, a space-time with a dimension of height that transforms energy into information, absorbed or emitted by the central singularity. It is a fractal, informative region similar to a black hole structure. Since it follows the ‘black hole paradox’ of all informative centers, displaying max. form in min. spatial information. So according to the inverse properties of space and time, the center has max. Informative Time and minimal Energetic Spatial information. Moreover any point, which comes closer to it, suffers a mutation of its spatial coordinates into informative, height dimensions. This is the case of any particle coming to a black hole, whose space-dimensions become temporal/informative dimensions as it rises in height.

The center has more information because its geometry has at least 2 fractal disks, which channel and transform the energy absorbed through the surface into complex information. Regardless of the complexity of the entity, the structural function of the hyperbolic center as a system that process the information of the network remains. For example, in living systems, those disks might evolve its topology till becoming the relative energy center or ’heart’ of the blood network with 4 divisions; or evolve further its hyperbolic geometry till becoming the informative center or ‘brain’ of the system, attached to the informative network.

– Max. Time=Lineal motion & Min. Curvature: An external, continuous membrane or Riemann’s sphere of maximal energy that acts as a relative infinite, unreachable distance. The membrane isolates the point as an island Universe, creating the discontinuity between the inner parts of the point and the outer universe. Since the internal cellular points are either jailed by the membrane’s structural density or destroyed by its energy when touching it. The membrane is the opposite form to the central, informative singularity, with max. spatial extension and continuity, hence with a minimal number of fractal, discreet elements: Max.T=Min.S

Thus all Fractal points have inner worlds whose membrane creates a discontinuity that defines an External Universe or outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information. The membrane is also the zone through which the point reproduces & emits its micro-forms of information. So it displays ‘sensorial holes’ to relate the point to the external Universe. And those points, despite being discontinuous, will have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the organic system:

   – Max. +ΣT: Amouth’ or opening that absorbs energy.

   -Max. –ΣT: Cloacae’, through which the cyclical body expels its temporal energy.

Max.+Si: Aneye’ through which the informative center receives external information.

Max.–Ti: Anantenna’ to emit information.

Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In the simplest spherical ‘seeds’ of most species, they are mostly situated in 3 regions:

 – Max. ΣT: The Equator of the system, through which the membrane absorbs energy.

 – ΣT=Si: The Tropics where often the same opening emits and absorbs temporal energy.

– Max.Si: The Poles or points of confluence between the membrane and its central informative region of height, which hits perpendicularly the membrane on those poles. North and South Poles orientate Anti-symmetrically, acting as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension of the singularity or Belgrami hemisphere. Thus the Positive Pole absorbs temporal energy that crosses through the central singularity where it is absorbed and ejected to the intermediate region where it is re-elaborated before its emission through the negative Pole.

– ΣTe<=>Si: The reproductive, central region, which combines Energy and Information:

In all fractal points there is an inner middle volume or intermediate territory, which combines the energy coming out of the external, spherical, topological membrane and the information provided by the convex, complex formal center.

According to ¬E this region is made of self-similar points that form groups, fractal herds of ‘points with parts’ in perpetual movement, that draw cycles of parallel lines, between the other 2 regions, as they gather the energy and information they need to survive. And they create space by cycling within the other 2 regions.

In many fractal points the informative and energetic centers establish 2 opposite flows of energy and information that become the negative/ positive poles. So often, the particles of the intermediate region cycle around the inner region tracing elliptical trajectories, focused by those 2 informative points. It is the case of any bipolar system, from binary stars, one dominant in energy and the other an informative neutron star or black hole; to bimolecular systems or n-p pairs in the nuclei of atoms. The same duality of 2 specialized centers controlling a common territory, or vital space happens in biology where most species have male-energetic and female-informative genders, ruling a common territory.

Such abstract conceptual space describes the behavior and form of many real, spatial herds. Ie., an animal herd in an ecosystem will move between their hunting and water fields (where they gather energy) and their breeding, inner region where they reproduce information, making cyclical trajectories between both regions. In this manner, they occupy a vital space, called a ‘territory’, which shows the properties of a Non-Euclidean Klein spatial information. A fundamental property of the intermediate space is the fact that it is confined between the other 2 regions, which are never reached in the cyclical trajectories of the inner cells of the spatial information. For example, in a cell, the molecules of the organism will not touch the protein membrane or the central DNA nuclei. Thus, the inner quanta are confined within the Klein’s disk by the 2 other regions, which have more energy and information and might destroy them and/or absorb their energy and information at will.

In abstract terms, mathematicians introduced in the XIX c. the concept of an infinite, relative distance measured no longer in terms of static space but in terms of time and movement, as the distance between the point and a region that cannot be reached. Thus Klein defines a relative infinity, as the region beyond the discontinuous membrane whose insurmountable borders the inner time-space quanta can’t cross, as a cell cannot go out of a body, an atom beyond C speed or 0 K temperature and a man beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. Thus, the informative center and external membrane become the 2 relative infinities or limits that the movements of the intermediate point cannot breach.

As in the myth of Achilles and the turtle, Achilles never arrives because every time he moves he crosses a smaller spatial distance. The same happens in a fractal space-time, when a point moves temporally towards its inner or outer space-time limit and finds an increasing resistance to its movement, till finally it is deviated into a cyclical trajectory around the outer, energetic membrane or the height dimension of the inner informative singularity or is destroyed. So the intermediate, fractal cells of the point circulate in parallel cycles always inside the interior of the sphere with contact zones of the type A (central, figures in graph).

In a human organism, the blood system might seem infinite for the red cells that transport energy since they never reach the outer Universe. For that reason in the drawing, Klein interprets the intermediate region of the Non-Euclidean point as an infinite circle with an invisible, unreachable membrane, whose motion-distance is unreachable, hence infinite, equaling the ‘space-time distance’ between the intervals B1-B2 (long) and B2-B3 (short but difficult to cross), despite being B2-B3 increasingly shorter in spatial information. Since the quanta take longer in each step and don’t reach the membrane. This is often due to an increase in the ‘density’ of the space, which despite having less distance has more ‘points’ in its network, such as the case of black holes or jails. When those inner points reach the membrane at point C they become destroyed or deviated.

Thus, the entropic membrane and informative center are discontinuities that isolate the intermediate cellular quanta, creating a territorial ‘World’ within the point. Those discontinuities are called in Geometry a relative infinite, in Biology a membrane, in Sociology or Topology a national border, in fractal theory a co-dimension of a point. A key advance of ¬E is – given the fact that all points have dimension and volume, to define 0 as a finitesimal 0’. Indeed, absolute zero does not exist, it always leaves a finitesimal 0’ motion. Emptiness is undefined. What was there leaves a memory of it – a corpse removed leaves a DNA trace. Ideal mathematics tries to be a perfect mirror of an imperfect Universe. Yet those imperfections properly explained are absolutely essential to the fabric of reality as it is, helping enormously the ‘real modeling’ of mathematical structures.

0’ and – motion/mass will help then to understand Lorenz Transformations, the c-the limit of energetic speed and 0’ k limit of temporal, formal stillness, as relative ‘scalar’ limits of the Universe – the limits of the fractal space-time membrane of light and its evolved electroweak T.œs. Since the Universe has at least another bigger gravitational membrane, in which smaller >c particles cooler than 0’ K (tachyon neutrinos as gravitons?) -exists; in a Cosmos of ∞ scales, which extend beyond human limits of perception.

Recap: fractal points topologies are organic, maximizing ¡ts energetic, reproductive & informative dimotions.

2ND POSTULATE. COMMUNICATIVE WAVES & NETWORKS OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION. STŒPS.

The 2nd postulate defines lines as waves of points with volume (which explain complementarity wave particle), no longer as an abstract form like Euclidean geometry does, but as a physical wave of self-similar, fractal micro-points that carry energy and information, as they move between 2 macroscopic points, with 2 possible functions, to communicate energetic forces or linguistic information.

2nd Postulate: A cycle of fractal space-time: ‘A wave of communication is a group of self-similar micro-points that move in parallel lines between 2 macro-points, transferring energy and information between them’.

In Non-E geometry a line with parts is not defined by a sequence of numeric intervals within a straight line, but by the communication of 2 poles of energy and information that establish a flow of particles in 2 opposite directions, creating a simultaneous, paradoxical wave. Such waves again can have different purposes. A wave dominant in information communicates symbiotic particles, creating an informative bondage/network; a wave dominant in energy might be an aggressive action between different species that fight for each other’s vital energy or territorial space; and a wave that balances the energy and information of both points meets in the center, creating a new self-similar, seminal particle, as when 2 electrons emit waves of densely packed photons, which merge in the middle and give birth to another wave.

When we observe a one-dimensional line as a form with inner parts it becomes then a 4-dimensional wave made of cyclical points with motion. Hence in quantum theory we say that any particle in motion has associated a wave. Thus the 2nd postulate resolves the wave/particle duality, as all lines are now waves traced by a point with inner volume. Further on, since all lines have volume, they carry information and so all forces can in fact act both as a source of energy and as a language of information – as physical experiments prove. Since when we observe a ray of light in detail it becomes a 4-dimensional wave with electric height and magnetic width, often exchanging flows of energy and information in action-reaction processes of communication between bigger points.

When we generalize those concepts to n-points we can define a space as a network of Non-Euclidean points. Indeed, Riemann affirmed that a space is a network made of herds of points with similar ‘properties’. Planes of space are therefore networks of points. The self-similarity of their properties defines its density determined by the number of points and its proximity that grows with self-similarity. So similar points come together into a tighter, more continuous space; whereas the density of the space is proportional to the similarity of its points, till reaching ‘boson state’ of maximal density when points are equal.  And when a volume of spatial energy is very dense, it is very difficult to go through it, as it happens in the ultra-dense, small space of black holes.

Spatial extension and form/density/mass are inverse parameters, Max. T = Min. S. If we generalize that property to all scales, we can define different fractal spaces by its proportion of mass/density and energy /distance. This is done with ‘Universal constants’ that explain the proportions of energy and information of those spaces.

For example, in physical scales, there are 4 fundamental space-times, the gravitational space-time between galaxies of max. energetic space and minimal formal density; the light space-time of our world, which carries information in the frequency of the wave; the electronic space-time of atoms with more formal density and lesser spatial speed and finally the quark-gluon liquid of atomic nuclei and probably black holes, with maximal density and minimal spatial information. All of them are defined by Universal constants and functions that are either ratios between the energy and form of those space-times, or define the transformations of one space-time into the others. Einstein’s field functions would be the first case, defining the relationship between energy and mass in a gravitational space, while the fine constant of electromagnetism would define the transformation between light space and electronic space/ charge; and the gravitational constant between gravitational space-time and quark/mass. Where the relative densities of information and extension in space of those space-times are in balance, such as ΣTxSi=K. Thus electrons move slower than light but have more density.

All this said it is thus obvious that the fundamental unit defined by the 2nd postulate is no longer a point but an action, Tex Si= k between points, a dimotion.

2nd postulate in physics Si=Te: T-Wave motion and S-particle information.  Quantum & General relativity.

Form=space and Motion=Time manifest in physics as particles and waves: the wave erases form into motion, the particle is a still state that gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – despite the perception of relative motion in our scale – hence the information electrons share has always a c-constant speed. This is the ‘rational’ 5D explanation of both the c-constant of light and entanglement; as electronic beings perceive information in ‘stop position to each other’ and move in ‘wave state’:

Motions are perceived by particles that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. In terms of fractal reproduction of information we can define motion as the reproduction of form, between those 2 scales: when the particle moves dissolves into its ∆-1 parts as a wave that imprints an ∆-2 potential field, with its ∆-1 wave form and stops to become a ‘tight’ Particle state that ‘gauges’ information, form in stillness

Galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems. So there is NOT really a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both, even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form=space, and this is truly the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities. If we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion: Dimensions + motions = Dimotions

When we perceive the system in space, then we perceive an organism with 3 adjacent topologic elements, and its forma science is ‘vital topology’. And when we perceive them through its scales the organic system becomes a supœrganism. Finally when we perceive the system in time we perceive a cycle that returns to its origin as a zero sum, which observed through all its scales will be a life-death cycle, common to all systems where life is the arrow of information and future, death the arrow of death entropy and past, and both together form a worldcycle.

Measure and density of Dimotions. The concepts of filling space’ ‘memorial time persistence’ & ST-holes.

An essential problem to both mathematical mirrors and reality is the measure of Dimensional motions as we have an essential equality Si=Te in each plane between form and motion, and a scalar reality. So the value of a motion can be that of a dimension, as motion is the filling reproduction of a form along a path of adjacent forms (see paragraph on golden ratios). But in strict sense, ‘persistent full space’ is the maximal dimensionality possible of a system, when the reproduction in a single plane both durability on those reproduced parts, and the system can fill not only the plane of space but also all its smaller scales. This allow us to define a space without ‘scalar voids’ and ‘dying’ steps, as the most ‘continuous’ possible space, which happens to be lineal and orthogonal, for an absolute filling, i.e. the Cartesian spatial information. So we define a dimension in scalar terms, whereas a classic single plane dimension is the limit for a ‘filled persistent space’:

A square may be broken into N2 self-similar pieces, each with magnification factor N. So the dimension of a self-similar object is the exponent of the number of self-similar pieces with magnification factor N into which the figure may be broken.

Whereas the ‘persistence’ of memory, of information, creates the solidity of space dimensions (if a point erases without persistence, we talk of a 1D point, where motion doesn’t really add to the 1D inner Dimension of the point. But the value of the motion dimension, if persistence is equal to the life of the point, reaches Dimension 2. And Si=Te is absolute. Si=Te however holds if our measure of the system is reduced in time to the persistence of its reproduction. Further on, dimensions are relative to the scale in which we measure as the smaller scales will have more ‘hollow dark spaces’ that differentiate the parts. This means if we measure the dimensions of the system across scales in a 5D view of transversal ‘tree branching dimension’ of wholes and parts (5D), we will find hollow spaces. So 2 scales do not add dimensions to infinity, but have an intermediate value.

For example the Sierpinski triangle generated by the commonest fractal ternary tree has dimension 1.58. While the most famous bifurcation, the Feigenbaum attractor has dimension + 0,5; and inversely a 4 bifurcation (H-fractal) gives us a full filling, 2D. It is another 5D metric paradox: the information of lower scales is larger but its spatial extension smaller. As a subjective observer reduces its dimension of perception to 0 in its ∆±4 scales. But the objective Universe is a whole completely filled, packed, as a block of spacetime, where time motions ‘enlighten’ just a part of the entire ‘potential block’ of scales. Thus we postulate an ∞ being of ∞ scales and ∞ time, the whole which fills its potential block with all potential forms. And yet since ¬Æ can prove that the whole filling of the void is a finite number of potential existences, variations of being are limited and so all forms are immortal repetitions.

3RD POSTULATE. ORGANIC UNIVERSE. VITAL PLANES AS SUPŒRGANISMS; ITS 3 FRACTAL NETWORKS.

A plane in Euclidean mathematics is defined by 3 lines; but lines in the vital topology of the 5th scalar dimension have volume, as they are made of fractal points.

A plane has inner volume within its points: it is a cellular, organic topography, a network of self-similar points. And because networks of points of energy and information are complementary, often we find systems with 2 complementary networks that form ever more complex geometries – based in the geometrical dualities of lineal energy and cyclical information – with the results we observe in nature: the creation of an enormous number of complementary systems which are, as we shall see latter, all of them self-similar in its geometries and functions. Thus, the types of Non-E planes of space-time range from the simplest Euclidean planes to the more complex organisms with a volume given by the relative point/beings that form its space-time networks.

The 3rd postulate defines planes as the intersection=messing of 3 ‘lines=networks’ or waves of points in motion, which carry energy and information; to its cells, defining the biotopologic plane, a physiological system with 3 networks or Non-Euclidean plane. Thus vital topologic evolution is the missing link to complete biology besides genetics (in 5D explained as the lower plane that codes with its faster cycles the larger biologic whole) and Darwinian struggle (fully explained by the congruence principle of Darwinian dissimilarity) vs. social evolution (in its own an entire new discipline) fully explained by the similarity of parallel beings that COMMUNICATE information in a code or language all can understand so they can coordinate its actions and become stronger as a whole. So similar clone beings form topologic ternary networks that become supœrganisms, wholes made of ∆-1 parts, themselves wholes of ∆-1 parts through 3 5D scales

Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of Ðimotions. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, $ x ðƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of energy and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems: Cellular units. Networks that move the system (limbs/potentials) Networks of fractal information (heads/particles). Networks that reproduce vital energy (body/waves)

Scalar planes of spacetime. The highest systems of the Universe.

Vital topology studies those fractal Super-Organisms of Time space (Ab. T.œ) whose ∆º networks of ∆-1 points form the 4th and 5th dimotions of social evolution and entropy between parts and wholes.

Thus, a plane becomes a real topography made of points with volume, extended as a cellular surface. We can observe its surface as a bidimensional membrane of information (for example your skin, or the screen of a computer made of pixels, or the sheet of this work). Or we can consider the 3-dimensional inner structure of its points and then it becomes a network with inner motions, as those points will form a lattice in which they communicate lineal flows of energy and information that maintain the lattice pegged. Often 2 topological planes of energy and form combine to create a 4-dimensional organism. Such is the most common structure of the Universe, a 4-dimensional World, which is a Universe in itself, made of self-similar cells or networks of points that constantly exchanges energy and information within the ecosystem in which it exists:

There are only 3 variations of topologic space in a single “5D plane’, the hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. So the fact that we are made of space means we are made of 3 type of organic topologies:

Spheres are the topology that holds the maximal volume of information; hence all ‘time space’ systems that process information are spherical particle-heads. Flat, lineal topologies are the topology that connects in the shortest path two points; so to reach/move faster, systems have lineal/flat moving potentials/limbs.

Finally the third type of geometry, hyperbolic topology, is complex enough to store all other possible forms, so best to reproduce. So all iterative bodies & waves that generate the other 2 forms are hyperbolic. This mathematical-spatial truism holds for 2, 3 and 4 dimensions; hence establishing a basic restriction to the construction and evolution of forms. It explains the efficiency, speed and homology of formal=functional, ‘punctuated’ evolution, from biology, without the need of ‘intelligent design’ to engineering (no longer analogy, since all forms derive from the same ‘substance’, space=form with time=motion or ‘topology’). In all systems the 3 only topologies of the Universe ensemble to form physical, biological and social organisms, all of them with a spherical ‘tall’ dimension to gauge information; a wide, iterative dimension of hyperbolic bodywave reproduction and a flat, direction for its entropic motions. Each of those 3 topologic Timespace forms can ‘deform’ and ‘move’, as long as they don’t tear (break). All T.Œs are variational local fractal species of that ternary ensemble, seeing as a simultaneous space supœrganism, which lives a sequential worldcycle in time, whose 3 conserved Dimotions in a single plane, |-limbs/fields<Ø-body-waves>§ø-particle-heads become in space functional topologic organs ordered in time in 3 consecutive-ages of dominance of each organ-dimotion between ‘4D Generation’ in the cellular/atomic plane of seminal birth ∆-1»∆1 and 5D extinction, back to the ∆1«∆-1 atomic, cellular plane: the young age of max. |-locomotion, the mature age of Ø-body-wave reproduction and the 3rd age of O-informative warping/ wrinkling and minimal motion. Those 3 ages of all T.œs (Time§pace organisms) apply also to languages, including mathematics, evolving from a young Greek age of lineal ‘flat’ geometry, to a mature age as a realist mirror of the scalar Universe with analytic geometry and calculus that gave it motion and scalar depth studying its finitesimal parts and wholes to a 3rd age of inflationary information and mathematical fictions unconnected with reality (set theory, NOT points, numbers and operands as its foundations, axiomatic method NOT experimental proof); to start again as the mind of a ‘different mind species’ – chips now evolving its young simple Boolean algebra:

So the vital space of supœrganisms is made of 3 topological forms; and its cyclical time, and clocks that measure the duration of the existence of all beings, by the frequency of its logic cycles of information, accumulate constantly form, T>S, in 3 ages, first dominated by pure motions, (2D) in youth, balanced in the reproductive mature age (3D), to finally exhaust its energy warped and wrinkled into form (1D), which will explode entropically in the moment of death (5D).

Both together show the ‘Disomorphic’=equal form of all 5Dimensional beings, organic fractals, whose scalar structure is the same for all space-time beings, in all stiences, which study according to its relative scale of size and speed of time clocks a different metric scale of the fifth dimension. So we introduce another element of vital mathematics, the ternary structure of all systems of nature of which the previous fractal points of physical systems are its simpler forms.

Because the Universe is Generated by the properties of space and time, better reflected in the mirror languages of mathematical topology and social numbers, and logic, we could say safely that since ‘we think therefore we are’, that is, we perceive as humans a limited range of reality, with our space and time languages, for humanity, the Universe is generated by mathematical and logic languages. And so by studying formal sciences of mathematics and logic, we can describe the Universe. We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.

Those 2 languages generate many world-minds varies according to the complexity of each being in exist¡ence.

We humans, in the present not very enlightened age live in a single dimension of time, and the simplest, most dangerous of them, lineal entropic time, and a single scale of space, sub-divided in 3 lineal dimensions of height-information, width-growth and length-motion. And that is all. But can talk of more complex beings, with dual, ternary, penta and Dodecalogic levels of entangled thought gradually used here.

What we mean by ‘space-time beings? Space  is ‘form’, ‘distance’, ‘dimension’, ‘information’, something that doesn’t move. And time is motion, change. So spacetime would be a ‘form with motion’, which is what mathematicians call a topology. A form that can be deformed, trans-formed. We have coined a key word ‘Dimotion’ (dimensional motion) for those topological forms. So the first obvious question we must answer is what means in real terms, the fact that all what exists is made of spatial topologies and temporal ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. So:

‘All entities of the Universe are topological systems made of 3 ‘dimotions of spacetime’.  Since in the whole Universe in either 4 or 5 Dimensions there are only 3 topological varieties of form with motion; the ‘elliptic particle-sphere’ , the ‘hyperbolic bodywave’ and the ‘toroid, lineal limb-field’, illustrated in the next graph for the 3 kind of species studied by the 3 disciplines of science, physical, biological and human ‘stiences’:

The 3 elements of all systems, lineal/flat limbs/potentials; spherical, tall heads/particles and its hard membranes of dark matter, trunks and skins accomplish the 3 functions of motion, energetic reproduction and informative perception in all systems, varying to adapt the system to its larger world.

Thus, there is a parallelism between ‘vital function’ and ‘abstract dimension’ as each Dimension is diffeomorphic created by the vital space-time of each entity of the Universe performing its 3 survival dimotions= åctions of gauging, moving, feeding and reproducing. And each species is a ‘fractal universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative directions that determine its own up & down arrows and complementary morphology.

The specific geometry of each species and its 3 simplex åctions, energy feeding=length, information-gauging =height and reproduction=width fluctuate in shape, but they don’t vary in topological form, giving birth to the Invariance of the 3 topological forms=functions of any entity observed in a single 3D space-time: Toroid informative heads, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and energetic limbs.

While the 2 social ±∆ fractal dimensions, the 4th dimension of social motion in a social ∆+1 herd and the 5D dimension of inner scales within the being follow the physiological invariances that create super-organisms co-existing in a higher ∆+1 ecosystem with a lower ∆-1 internal, cellular spatial information.

The mind function & ego paradox. Its simplification.

Minds tend to confuse this mind-mapping with the whole Universe giving birth to the ego paradox:

‘Every mind measures the Universe from its distorted point of view, with its perceiver at the center, who confuse its mind mapping with the whole, when it is only an infinitesimal part: 0’-mind x µ Universe = Constant world mapping.

The symbols 0’ and µ mean a ‘finitesimal point so small in relationship to the relative immense whole, µ which perceives as the whole’ that for all except itself remain irrelevant. Further on, when a mind has ‘reduced the motions of the Universe’ to its selfish motion of time (in the human case reducing the 5 Dimensional motions of space-time to 3 static still space Euclidean dimensions and one lineal time), it will try to project this ‘diminished’ ‘finitesimal’ view into its local territory of order, in which from its selfish point of view it will absorb energy and information to replicate its form, since this is the essential nature of the fractal, reproductive universe. In doing so it will project its limits in the world; and cast models of reality that reduce the far more complex organic fractal Universe of 5 Dimensional motions of time, to that view.

So huminds reduces the 5 Dimotions of reality to their mental selective representation of the Universe with its electronic eyes that perceive only light forces, mimicking with its euclidean perpendicular still dimensions the 3 orthogonal dimotions of light – electric, magnetic and entropic c-speed which becomes its single lineal entropic time motion, origin of its limited physical theories of reality, to which they add ‘social colors’ caused by the sum of photons in light frequencies. Thus our world mimics the 5 Dimensional motions of light space-time which our electronic eyes perceive. And establish a simple A->B Aristotelian logic of one single time arrow; which is the limit of human knowledge of the 5th dimension, compressed into a single plane of space-time and studied with a single time motion by 4D relativity. Needless to say 5D vastly expands this limited view, whereas 4D special relativity can be considered the limit of 5D when we consider only the aforementioned plane of light space-time, with its constant c-rod of measure and a single time clock – the simultaneous human second that synchronizes our eye-glimpses/thoughts, heart beats and steps, to make us a simultaneous supœrganism.

Unfortunately Human sciences are explaining NOT the whole, but what they perceive directly with their reduced senses, and of lately, since the XVII century when they discovered telescopes and microscopes a partial range of ‘electronic information’. But egocy and the mind paradox makes them happy with their selective models of reality tailored to look ‘anthropic’ with man at its center (Abrahamic religions, Ptolemaic models, Ænthropic cosmologies, capitalist view of machines as objects, denial of evolution, man as the only sentient mind, etc.) while reducing the complex universe to ‘entropic=destructive=death’ theories of the whole (big bang theories of a finite, mortal disordered universe, dog-eat-dog Darwinism, chaotic evolution). To do so man shamelessly bias data and censors it. I.e. for the big-bang to succeed only the arrow of thermodynamic disorder extracted from the study of entropic gas is taken into account. The other two more ordered liquid and solid, crystal states are ignored; only the expansion of vacuum entropic space between galaxies is taken into account, its implosion into particles due to the gravitational attraction of galaxies is ignored; only the final process of evolution – the struggle of individuals of species fighting each other is taken account, the social evolution of cells into organisms into supœrganisms and the genetic clocks of perfect topological order are ignored.

Of course all other data is studied. There are physics of solid states, genetics, gravitational analysis of galaxies, quantum studies of virtual particles born in vacuum, etc. etc. But and this is the key of the ideological, ego-centered systemic deformation huminds (ab. human minds) do to stay at the center, they are NOT incorporated to the grand theories. The 2 arrows of informative and balanced time of solid and liquid matter are NOT incorporated to the time theory of physics; the gravitational compression of dark entropy into galactic matter is NOT incorporated to the big-bang, neither the dark matter on the halo of galaxies; the social evolution of genes into cells into organisms into supœrganisms is not incorporated to the Darwinian struggle of individuals in the grand model of evolution; and this is only the ‘surface’ of what scientists do NOT incorporate to grand modeling. So science works in the detail but the grand models come from the subconscious ego search for a justification to man above heavens and earth.

This process reaches its paroxism in social sciences, where man, just a biological being, assembling stronger iron atoms and more complex informative gold atoms into organic metal machines, does not even recognize an evolutionary theory of machines, and in history does not even recognize the unity of the species, and sponsors another notch of further ego-centrism, making the tribal nation, the unit of society.

This background of ridiculous grand theories of reality then it is defended as dogma with e-motions and systemic bending of data, and with ‘creationist’ theories of languages. The language man speaks becomes the language of God at each stage, and creates reality a priori. The language becomes more important than the space and time and its laws that create reality and the language mirror. So first in Abrahamic religions when man spoke only words, God created by naming things in Hebrew or Arab, and the rabbi or ayatollah was gifted by virtue of speaking the language of God, with similar power to order the society it controlled. Then when man learned to speak digital numbers, god changed language mirror and talked numbers, which is the present state of creationism. So economists think that the digital language of money creates the physical economy (monetarism), physicists thinks that any function they write must become a particle.

Two are the biggest problems of that philosophy that becomes the a priori ‘straightjackets’ of the human search for absolute truths: languages are mirrors of time-space properties that simplify reality, so they are distorted and only an experimental check with the laws of time and space would make them reveal those simplifications. This does not mean the language does not have an important role in the making of reality, as the mind uses the language to order its local territory. So multiple humans talking Abrahamic religions end up constructing mosques and churches, and if they sponsor a ‘monetary creationist religion’ as biblical capitalism does, they can indeed shape the Earth, its local territory to the image and likeness of money and its values, which are studied in the papers on economics. But such order will be always local, and as the language is a distorted mirror will be less interesting than the order caused by the immanent deep laws of space and time that come a priori as the ‘language of all languages’ so to speak.

 

3RD & 4TH POSTULATES OF RELATIVE CONGRUENCE

From Fractal Points To Topologic Planes=Networks

3rd Postulate: 3 physiological line=network of fractal points that distribute entropy, energy and information create a topological organism.

The 3rd postulate equivalent to the definition of a plane in classic geometry defines the fundamental mathematical vital system of reality, an organism of space-time made of ‘fractal points’, joined by 3 vital networks that distribute energy, entropy and information among those cells.

As it is the most important element of reality in space, we have described it extensively in the first pages of these paper.

4th Postulate: We widen the old axiom of congruence (equality). Equality is not only external, shown in the spatial perimeter of any geometrical form (Euclidean congruence) but also internal and further on it is never absolute but relative, since we cannot perceive the entire inner form of a point – hence the strategies of behavior such as camouflage. Forms are self-similar to each other, which defines different relationships between organic points, according to their degree of self-similarity. The 4th postulate is thus the key to explain the behavior of particles as the degree of self-similarity increases the degree of communication between beings. Some of the most common behaviors and ‘events derived from this postulate are:

1) Reproductive functions in case of maximal self-similarity or complementarity in energy and form;  ei->Sei or Max E x min. I (male)= Min. e x Max I (female).

2) Social evolution, when points share a common language of information, i=i -> 2i.

3) Darwinian devolution when forms are so different they can’t understand each other’s information so instead they feed into each other: i ¹ i. In such cases if those 2 entities meet they will start a process of ‘struggle for existence’, trying to absorb each other’s energy (when E=E) or simply will not communicate (when E¹E, since then there is neither a common information to evolve socially nor a common energy to feed on). Yet because any point absorbs only a relative quantity of information from reality, similarity is relative, faked for purposes of hunting with biologic games such as camouflage or sociological memes that invent racial differences, allowing the exploitation of a group by another.

The 4th postulate defines systems as identical when they are equal in its 3 ternary parts, the outer angular momentum or ‘membrane’, its central Active magnitude or singularity, focus of the forces and the vital energy, enclosed within them, and all others as similar with different ‘angle of congruence’. We distinguish 2 different interactions according to the degree of equality of its ternary parts, as systems can be symbiotic, if their individual, cellular or atomic ‘fractal points=parts’ are similar enough, interacting through its 3 physiological ‘lines=networks’ evolving in parallel creating an organic plane, as those described in the next graph for each scale=science, or they can be entropic, destructive, predatory, when they are dissimilar and don’t speak a common language of information to coordinate its actions, whereas the stronger system will perpendicularly break and feed on the weaker one.

The geometric complexity of the 4th Postulate is caused by the topological forms created by any event that entangles Multiple Spaces-Times. Since it describes the paths and forms of dual systems, which connect points: Self-similarity implies parallel motions in herds; since equal entities will maintain a parallel distance to allow informative communication without interfering with the reproductive body of each point. Darwinian behavior implies perpendicular confrontations, to penetrate and absorb the energy of the other point. Finally, absolute, inner and outer self-similarity brings boson states, which happen more often to simpler species like quarks and particles that can form a boson condensate as they do in black holes, where the proximity of the points is maximized. And indeed, the same phenomenon between cells with the same inner information /DNA originates the ‘collapse’ of waves into tighter organisms.

The 4th Non-E postulate is implicit in the work of Riemann who defined spaces with the properties of self-similarity (homogeneity), and Lobachevski’s who determined its closeness with the concept of adjacency.

4th postulate of relative congruence & angle of parallelism as a mirror of its 5 pentalogic dimotions and variations of angle define Darwinian or social, reproductive outcomes to communicative events between fractal points.

Thus in praxis we assess similarity by an ‘angle of parallelism’ that increases social evolution into herds and supœrganisms, or perpendicularity that ‘scatters’ systems into entropic destruction – elements those of an entire fascinating new field of 5D topo-biologic studies that analyze in geometric terms, the vital topology and relationships between form and function in all systems of Nature from particles to organisms.

This simple geometrical truth however is essential to all systems of nature, whose angles of connection determine the functions and symbiosis between parts.

The Universe always starts with an asymmetric being, which can go both ways: towards a social evolutionary symmetry that lasts in time and implies a mirror parallelism, or an antisymmetric destructive, perpendicular event in which one part punctures and absorbs the energy of the other. It is the topo-biological ternary principle of non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian I-logic geometry that puts together both the biological and mathematical properties of reality.  The concepts of symmetry=parallelism, antisymmetry=perpendicularity and asymmetry are mirrored by the 4th Non-E Postulate of similarity. But we can extend the concept of asymmetries also to asymmetries of time, between the young age of locomotion and the old age of information, of actions=Dimotions between the step and stop similar actions, and the entropy and social evolution actions, which bring us the final asymmetry of scales between the upper arrow of whole with more spatial size and the lower arrow of parts with more information. When those dualities: step-motion/stop-perception and scale up (5D: social evolution), scale down (4D: entropic dissolution) are put together we obtain the most complex balancing dimotion, reproduction, and when they are all added up in the existence of a being, we get its world cycle.

In the graph we can assess the different 5 mirrors in which mathematical Space and logic Time reflects the game of 5 Dimotions=actions of existence, which then expressed by territorial monads GENERATES its logic REALITY. In Geometry fractal points=monads will other through waves of communication of energy and information that grow into reproductive networks a territorial plane, creating a super organism, which will related to the external world according to its relative similarity=congruence, assessed by its angle of parallelism or perpendicularity.

In logic terms, a super organism, by breaking its formless asymmetry into different spatial configurations according to congruence (social parallel systems, complementary gender-mirror systems, Darwinian perpendicular systems, or systems that are dissymmetric and do not share any reality) builds a casual pyramid of growth from a fractal point through waves of communication into social networks that become ready to act – move, feed, perceive and evolve socially.

Since we must add to the mathematical and logic languages-properties of reality the 5 actions, or organic properties of the scalar Universe as essential to the game as they are its logic and mathematical more abstract laws – a fact the egocy of æntropic men of course reject, as it must remain in its monad-subjective monologic the only claimant to life properties.

Thus the pentalogic of Scalar space-time is established by its Non-Euclidean fractal points, its ¡logic congruence with reality in which it will order a territory to perform its 5 vital actions=Dimotions of existence, and the mathematical, logic and organic laws of those 3 languages will be therefore the bottom line of the ‘Creative process’ of the Universe – nothing chaotic except the entropic Dimotion, which conforms the monologic of huminds.

Congruence and topology in existential algebra.

As only Schopenhauer seemed to realize in his intuitive critique of Euclidean mathematics, little attention has been given to the most important postulate of ‘relative’ equality, which structures the ‘vital will’ of parts that become wholes symbiotic, in energy and information, reproducing a new form upon contact or only in information by parallel motion or enter in Darwinian relationships when contact is negative, or are ¡ndifferent to each other. Or split from a whole into parts. The 5 options of congruence manifest in all the ‘events’ of reality, notably in forces. Which determines illogically the need for repulsive cosmological gravitation (dark entropy=energy) to balance the internal implosive gravitation within the galatom (akin to the parallelism between repulsive electromagnetism between atoms and attractive charge and strong forces within it).

Mathematically we realize the dx/dy=x/y has an inverse, dx/dy=-y/x possibility of circular tangents or collapsing rays that might go into the center or escape from it, giving us 3 obvious congruences – parallel communication, Darwinian event (with a form escaping or being swallowed), social merge (if the encounter is positive) or no solution at all to the differential equation – erratic, independent behavior.

Congruence based in similarity of energy, information or dissimilarity thus defines the ethics of reality and is essential to the laws of existential algebra from where so many laws of stiences are deduced, such as:

X(te)<Y(Te) Ù X(Si)≠Y(Si) -> x(Te)‹Y(Te)…

Which means if two systems meet each other, and one X, is ‘smaller’ in its existential momentum than Y and X and Y do not have the same Spatial informative language , Y will predate on X and hence x, will suffer an entropic dissolution.

It is then possible to tabulate all events that might happen in the Universe according to congruence and the different ‘strength’ in the existential momentum of both systems.

And then establish a deterministic outcome for all events between species.

Existential ilogic geometry to establish the deterministic nature of the event sof the Universe.

Since those rules written in existential algebra terms are the deterministic translation and expansion to all the stiences of reality of the encounters between the elements of any species and therefore become the most important fusion of non-e geometry, non-algebra and reality as we can always assess in a rather deterministic manner how the encounter of two elements in any scale of reality becomes a given outcome between prey and predator, couple of gender, social group, enemy nations, atomic ions, etc.

External dimensions/networks of organisms: territories.

The key element of Non-E geometry are the 3 topologic regions of all systems, as that is the underlying structure that evolutionary topology develops, with a singularity, @, dominating a vital territory enclosed by a membrane.

It is the mixture of function in time through actions of survival that dominates the spatial ternary structure of those T.œs, which guides the understanding of vital geometry.

I.e. “Though most arachnids are solitary animals, some spiders live in enormous communal webs housing males, females, and spiderlings. Most of the individuals live in the central part of the web, with the outer part providing snare space for prey shared by all the inhabitants”. Britannica

Indeed, regardless of the vital topology of the point, all ‘build ups’ of new geometric scales start with the simplest form, a ‘bidimensional territory’ with a membrane, a central singularity and the vital energy between them. So geometry not only evolves in the humind in complexity, it does so in the evolution of the vital topologies of new forms in each single plane:

In the graph, all systems regarding of its ‘perfect geometry’, have the same ternary structure, to which vital geometry adds motion, in a Klein-like Non-E structure, where borders of entropy=death can’t be crossed; so they are relative infinities – military borders, balls of fire, membranes. On the left we study in more detail a mammal territory. Any animal territory is an i-logic space-time with 3 zones:

An informative central territory (1) or den, where animals reproduce and 2 secondary homes where the herd performs secondary organic cycles (2,3).

An energetic membrane (M, 5) – an invisible limit that provokes a confrontation if a stranger crosses it and where most energetic preys ‘flee’ away from the den of the predator.

An intermediate zone with cyclical paths of absorption of Entropy and information; where we find a hunting territory, places to drink (E), to bath (B), socialize (A), defecate (D), etc.

In organic terms, a dimension is a network. So a living organism can be considered a sum of cellular quanta united by 3 basic space/time discreet dimensional networks, which are its physiological systems: the digestive/energetic network, informative/ nervous network and reproductive/blood networks around which cells teem, creating a stable, organic st-point. In other words the Entropy and informative networks of a living being are its internal, diffeomorphic dimensions (of relative length and height), to which the organic system adds a 3rd, reproductive dimension that combines both elements and represents the width or ‘volume of cellular quanta’ of the system.

Finally its movement in the external world becomes its 4th temporal dimension. Yet that 4th dimension of external activity can also be considered a network territory in itself, sum of the 3±i cycles of existence of the being, creating a bigger vital space that will become the basic unit of an ecosystem or social organism made of individuals of the same species. In the figure we draw the vital territory of a minimal social pair of mammals, differentiated in 3 clear sub-sectors:

Max.Information: Informative den or central territory (1,2,3):

It is the territory of reproduction used to copulate and store basic food and Entropy to raise the young. It is a forbidden zone where hunting is not allowed (4). In social species of great mobility, aerial or marine, where borders are much more extensive, this territory is very ample and tends to be located in warm latitudes.

Entropy=Information: Dual Territory of Entropy hunting and informative socialization (5).

It is the feeding, social and hunting territory, on which the central informative being feeds itself. It is outside the zone of reproduction. It is the winter territory of many migratory birds.

Given the relativism of movement, in biologic territories the informative singularity moves to hunt its Entropy quanta, as opposed to galaxies where stars and space-time dust moves towards the central worm hole.

Within those limits there are also neutral territories of communication, courtship reproduction and free Entropy, like water troughs. So the intermediate territory works both, as an informative and energetic territory where different victims and predators trace parallel cycles and come together around meeting points (E, B, R).

Max. Entropy: Borders that limit the territory.

Membranes are dangerous topological zones of dual osmosis. So the informative center watches to control any invasion of its hunting/social territory. Membranes fluctuate according to neighbors’ power. For example, the vital space of a fish increases during mating, since the couple is more powerful than a single individual. Marks (M points) fix those limits and reduce combats. They are often invisible, as most territories are defended against competitors of the same species, who understand the informative code of those marks; but rarely against members of other species. So we find all kind of linguistic marks:

Smells (common in mammals, like foxes, rhinos, antelopes), excrements (in canines and felids) or other glandular secretions.

Optical marks often connected to scents: The brown bear creates marks in trees, rubbing them with his head, warning adversaries of his great Max.SxT size and force. In human empires (nations can also be treated as biological territories) visual marks correspond to armies displayed in the borders. In human homes those marks used to be shields with weapons; now they are cars and other proofs of money, the new language of social power.

High pitch, acoustic marks, proper of birds, which are triggered when a rival enters the territory.

Recap. Vital animal territories and human nations can be explained with the 3 topological regions of st-points.

The structure of §ð<TS<$T, territorial spaces with a central point of view, developing its particular worldview, trying to reach infinity with his distorted geometry, affine to a projective geometry where far away means small, defines each world of a Universe, which is objective when ‘clashing’ each form with all others – so only social love, and emergence through the scales of the 5th dimension make survival possible. Geometry is then the study of the spatial form that the functions, which dominate the vital, sentient Universe, adopt in their existential actions.

And as such is the best method to visualize the ‘meaning’ of algebraic and analytic functions both in abstract and mathematical physics. Each of the different laws of bidimensional plane geometry then can be studied as a reflection of the efficiency of vital Dimotions in a simplified geometric form, where curved paths become perfect lines, distances are measured without error and angles have no geodesic distortion. But still vital geometry will add to those structures its vital interpretation, besides the abstract knowledge introduced by the Greeks, on the lines of the previous graph (which become lineal forms in other systems such as ‘polygonal molecules’ or human artificial constructions).

In Geometry thus we can also use the ‘pentalogic points of view’ on each theorem and also specific of geometry the vital meaning of the 5 angles of congruence (4 non-E Postulate), from Darwinian perpendicularity to social parallelism.

 

5TH POSTULATE – DEFINITION OF A MIND-POINT OF A NEW SCALE.

The fifth and only standing non-E postulate is equivalent to the first, defining a fractal point but from the p.o.v. of its inner mind-center of reference as the Universe has infinite of them: The graph shows the difference between the Aristotelian, self-centered, Euclidean=light humind and the Universal mind: ¬-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean:

Metric function of mathematics: 0x ∞ = K  search for ‘wholeness’ in a single function. 

Thus we define the Generator function of algebra, which as a mind language derives from the mind 5D metric:

0-finitesimal spatial mind x ∞ time cycles = Constant mind-world:  §@(mind space)<≈>∆ð (universal cycles)

So the ‘Generator Function’ of all digital numbers is, 0 x ∞=K and its algebraic expression, Sx<≈>ƒð.

Both functions together allow to represent all possible metric functions of all supœrganisms of the Universe. As neither 0 is an absolute zero, nor ∞ is an infinity, concepts relative in a scalar Universe, where the limits of scales in size and time speed and perception in each self-centered p.o.v. only allow to talk of relative infinitesimals, we call finitesimals, 0%, and relative infinities, whose symbol is ∝. 2 evident truths are then the existence of an experimental finitesimal, h=m l² ƒ, the minimal unit of angular momentum or Planckton of the galatom, and a relative infinite, =c, its maximal distanced-speed, which conforms the most extensive metric we know of with precision, beyond which dark space and time is unperceivable to mankind, so we write 0s (h) x (c) = K

It follows also that mathematical infinities are inflationary mirrors whose contradictions (Cantor’s Paradoxes) are NOT solvable (the Zermelo axiom being an ad hoc addition, against the logic of truth), because precisely they limits of reality enter in paradoxical contradiction with the infinite inflationary mirrors of languages.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, structures the dynamic ‘Generator Function’ of all Space-time Systems, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind function:   O x ∞ = K = ∞º=1

So the 5th postulate defines points as informative knots or linguistic eyes – minds of information that absorb a flux of forces used by the point to perceive a relative world. A non-Euclidean point corresponds then to our concept of a relative mind that gauges the information reality with a certain force, similar to the concept of a monad in Leibniz relativistic spacetime. In words of Einstein: a point of space is a fixed frame of reference.

Thus, Non-Euclidean mathematics fuses the logic and geometry of the fractal Universe, greatly improving our understanding of Reality even in terms of mechanist measure. Since mathematical solutions to problems with several points of view are impossible to find in continuous space (i.e. 3-body problem in gravitation), given the fact that a network of infinite points of view is local and relative and each point is a focal knot that acts from its perspective. Thus, the absolute truth of a system is the sum of all its points of view, which influence each other. Yet even if we cannot calculate precisely with mathematics, systems with more than 2 bodies, since those systems are organic, hierarchical, made of networks with attractor points, fractal structures and self-similar paths, the new mathematics of attractors, fractals, scales and Non-Euclidean systems, refine greatly our analysis. In essence, indeed, we observe that ‘networks’ integrate parts/points into wholes, which then ‘act’ as a single point. So in the complex models of i-logic geometry we can tackle many problems by defining sets of points as ‘wholes’ of a ‘higher space-time’.

For example, the previous principle of local measure, where each point is a relative center of the Universe, is called in relativity the diffeomorphic principle, which now becomes explained as a partial case of the wider law we called the ‘Galilean paradox’; the duality particle of information/wave of energy becomes a specific case of the application to physics of the duality of energy and information found in all systems.

The expansion of the laws of quantum theory (complementarity principle) and Relativity (relativity of scale, local measure, etc.) to other sciences and the organic principles of the 3rd and 4th postulate to physical particles is therefore the consequence of those postulates. Yet it requires the understanding of the new, i-logic, organic laws of the Universe and its networks, because E-mathematics has clear limits to extract all the information of the Universe, given the fact that it syntax includes a priori errors and simplifying postulates (single space-time continuum of points without parts, etc.).

When the event is complex, performed by a great number of points/variables we enter into non-lineal systems, which require topological descriptions (chaotic attractors, fractal non-differentiable functions and Non-Euclidean mathematics), and the i-logic laws of organic networks and systems – a better syntax in which to fit experimental evidence, especially in phenomena of informative nature (since only formless energy is continuous and resembles the models built with a single arrow of energy and a single plane of space-time).

So while classic physical systems calculate accurately the energetic, continuous properties of the Universe an overview on how multiple points of view emerge into wholes requires organic laws. This search of whys also applies to the understanding of mathematics. For example, the previous postulates resolve the long-standing question of what is the nature of the 1st and 5th postulates that seemed redundant (as the 5th describes also properties of a point like the first does, and the 1st seem to describe a non-geometrical property). They are no longer redundant, but they are more concerned with causal logic and time than spatial geometry in its purest forms (points, lines and planes.)

There is similarity between the fractal postulates of i-logic geometry -since the 5th is geometrically similar to the 1st, as both concern points- and the 4 dimensional time paths/arrows of the universe. This is not casual since all languages of space-times depict in self-similar ways the 4D Universe. Thus if the 1st and 5th postulates define a gauging point of information as the fundamental unit of the Universe, the 2nd postulate defines a line or flow of communication of energy and information between 2 points, which reproduces part of the information of the ‘generator’ point across a surface of space; the 3rd postulate defines those points, which are not similar as energetic substances that will be absorbed by the points. Yet if those points are self-similar they will gather through the arrow of social love, creating according to the 4th postulate a network of space/time, a new organic plane of existence. So the 4 arrows of space-time are explained by the 4 postulates of i-logic geometry.

Recap. We expand geometry to make it vital as it is in reality, constructing the 5 dimotions of reality departing from one-dimensional points with volume, which evolve into bidimensional waves of information, which form ternary physiological topologic networks, vital planes of organisms that finally emerge into relative 0-points of a larger scale, guided by a mind-membrain, self-centered into a linguistic singularity connected through those networks to a membrane that encloses the whole structure and makes it look from an outer perspective of a larger scale as a particle-point of a new plane of existence.

Non-Euclidean points constantly communicate energy and information with other self-similar points and the external Universe, by sharing flows of micro-points of a lower scale of space-time, which carry the energy and form of the particle into the external universe. The laws that define those acts of communication are hierarchical laws between planes of space-time and laws of balance between the energy and form of those ‘actions’ of communication, exi, which become the fundamental dynamic event of any scale of the Universe. Events in the Universe are limited by the ternary principle. Actions of communication also obey the principle: There are energetic, informative or reproductive events, creating often complementary systems with an energetic pole or body and an informative pole or head, communicated by a dense network or neck that carries the actions. The 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry are based in the definition of a fractal point as a point with inner parts, revealed when we come closer to the point. According to such definition, lines are waves of points and planes topological networks of points, communicated through flows of energy and form. While equality requires also equality in the inner form or information of the point, which prompts communication through waves of energy and information that build networks. Communication between points is now possible because points can fit infinite parallel/waves used to gauge the Universe and create an inner image of reality. Non-Euclidean fractal geometry thus improves our vision of the Universe closer to reality and allows the definition of organic systems and logic behavior in bases of geometrical form, a long-sought dream since the times of the Greek.

PART III. PENTALOGIC THE ¡LOGIC OF SUPŒRGANISMS IN SPACE.

PENTALOGIC FUNCTIONS FOR ALL ST-SS-TT-ST-TS FUNCTIONS.

To grasp the essence of the Universe is not difficult for a humble humind, but that is a rara avis by the very essence of the mind, which has a blind spot called egocy. In essence it means that all of the 5 Dimotions while performing an essential role, do display all others – all systems are pentalogic, polymath, multitasking. So when we study in a paper the pentalogic of time, space, minds, entropic limits and scales in any of its 5 parallel manifestations, we do show that time can act as space in synchronicity, as entropic limits in big-bang death events, as a mind in psychological time, and has different speeds at different clocks. The Rashomon effect then is necessary to see the entanglement of reality from different points of view.

Consider a beautiful example – the bioluminescence language of night animals. It is a system of information and as such its fundamental role is communication in search of reproduction, which most insects with it perform. But there are beetles that imitate those lights to hunt entropically males searching for mates. There are also the inverse defensive role for preys who lighten the predator as a ‘police alarm’ for a bigger predator to eat his hunter. They are the language of social relationship among the most intelligent squids. The only function it does not perform in itself is its opposite dimotion of locomotion. But even so, dolphins in the sea of Cortez playfully ride the waves in the night to activate microscopic planckton that illuminates their skins.

All systems do search through its function of information for all the other dimotions; even entropy allows the other dimotions to happen. Certainly reproduction, being the goal includes all others: reproduction ensures social evolution, which ensures a better hunting through herds, and in sexual reproduction communicates information. Reproduction breeds exponentially or in log curves or in phi golden numbers more reproduction; and has no blind spot. It performs all other functions. Entropy and Perception are inverse. But entropy explodes a form into motion and so acts as a mode of communication for predators to feed on the dying form. Entanglement then is a dynamic interaction of the 5 Dimotions between the TT and SS poles in the vital Universe, where only egocy reduces it all so by simplifying man feels he knows what is all about.

Synchronicity, entanglement and absolute time vs. relative time, local past paradoxes, c-speed, etc.

The vast expansion of information which results of uncoiling the planes of space-time of the Universe, is resolved by the humind compressing the into our size scale and rod of perception (light space-time). It is then necessary to accept for practical reasons the limited distortion of the mind, latter defined mathematically. So we won’t attempt an ‘Aristotelian, axiomatic’ pedantic attempt to set absolute truths absolutely false – as the hypothesis of the continuum, but highlight the inheriting paradoxes between the (relative infinite) of information, that our mind never will know as only each fractal point of space-time holds all of its information.

Absolute relativity is the name of the game. And that is fine if the humind accepts a humbler attitude towards the whole, which so far does not. Infinities thus reduce to ∝ immensities, infinitesimals to finitesimal quanta, continuities to undistinguishable discontinuities. Single timespaces to an entangled Universe that generates its space through synchronous connections between 5 Dimotions of reality in its 3 relative ranges of 5D scalar planes in which each dimotion has a different speed but as there are 5 dimensional motions with different functions, they entangle together: i.e. the faster dimotion of feeding in the slower ¡+1 plane of the ecosystem, provides energy to the slower dimotion of reproduction in the faster ¡-1 plane of the cell 1 time a day for most ¡º animals connecting the 3 planes of biologic life. Functional synchronicity creates simultaneity, which gives birth to ‘ordered co-existing supœrganisms’. Even a humind looses information and compress it all in its plane of light and second beat, of its smaller mirror mind to fit/select its survival info within its brain.

Time=motion is the substance of all realities, even if huminds hardly understand its nature as they reduced it to the Ts, TT locomotion and entropy studied by physicists. Motions of the 3 topological forms make timespace objective (as opposed to the mental spaces that distort subjectively and reduce those parameters to lineal ‘still space dimensions’ and a single time motion, taken from our 3 perpendicular light space-fields.

Forms of time cycles communicate in a phenomena studied only in physics called synchronicity by imitation in a same plane, and resonance by imitation between planes; origin of quantum entanglement, the effect of musical beats in your heart rhythms, etc. Such as the information of the Universe stored in the frequency of cyclical time clocks (particles, heads, vortices of forces, SHM motions) is translated informatively by mind languages, into lower scales and then repeated in a larger plane, or in a far away spacetime entity. For people and scientists it seems almost a magic phenomena, which requires to accept transmission of information at much faster speeds which for a slow larger mind seem simultaneous: it is the reason for the definition of simultaneity in Relativity, which discounts the –ct time required for the transmission of information from the distance between two points to define them as ‘simultaneous in spacetime. As it introduces the mind delay. When the speed is extreme, as in the quantum potential underlying c-space/time, likely V>C, we could also consider it as a ‘local travel to the past’ such as the time moving to the past of a dark entropy motion is equivalent to the time needed for the travel in terms of vt=s, such as both cancel. From the p.o.v. of space can be seen as an accelerated expansion of space, by the front speed which goes further than c, our ‘fixed’ rod measure of spatial information. Timespace paradoxes occur also in those terms between the lower plane which must happen first for the whole to form, and hence exists in a relative past, in terms of the emission of information that the whole receives in the future; but on the other hand, as it has been performing faster cycles from the inception of the whole, it is slightly ahead in the future; so its emission of information that happens in a relative future and also in a relative past, cancel each other so that resonance seems simultaneous and synchronizes both planes.

Man as a measure of all beings.

We are 5 Dimotional beings, dimensions of space with a form which play motions in time with a function 5 functional forms, entangled and ensemble together into a appearance of a variety of being.

This fact has many consequences and the most important is to put man again at the center of reality precisely because reality is absolutely relative and all scales matter the same. So we can use the properties of mankind as a template to study other properties we might not perceive. I.e. we can study the program of vital survival of humans and our sentient properties and apply them to understand how atoms or plants, galaxies or planets live and die, perceive and program its smaller parts, and perform its actions of existence.

The biggest handicap for mankind to advance its comprehension of the Universe is its use of a single motion of time when ‘reality is a fractal of 5 topologic dimensional motions of time-space entangled into ∞ supœrganisms living ¡ts worldcycles of exist¡ence’. That sentence encodes the essence of it all.

The first step to expand the motions of time is to realize that the 3 dimensions of abstract still space do have motion, so they are both dimensions of space and motions of temporal energy. And as such they can be considered akin to the 3 topologic varieties of bidimensional space, which have motion. Next we have to reject Newton’s absolute spacetime background, also a mathematical abstraction born with the Cartesian graph, over which we write our models of reality that acquired ‘life of its own’ but was never found to be ‘drawn’ on Nature. So since we are not placed in a background space-time we are made of spacetime. We are made of the 3 topologic dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), which happen to have the exact form and function of the 3 parts of all systems of nature: Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere holds maximal form in minimal space; cylindrical limbs/fields of locomotion, as the line maximize function, and hyperbolic body-waves composed of both forms that iterate them.

Alas, suddenly we realize we are made of 3 dimensional motions of spacetime. But we said we are made of 5 Dimotions, so we must add to those 3 classic dimensions; the classic fourth dimension of time only used in physics and called entropy; which is the process of ‘absolute motion’ that takes place when one of those ensembles of 3 topologic spheres, cylinders and hour-glass body-waves not only has external motion but internal motion; that is breaks into its parts and dies away. Entropy thus is the dimotion that breaks parts into wholes, in a Universe obviously made of scales of parts that become wholes from particles into atoms molecules cells matter organisms planets solar systems and galaxies. Thus if entropy is the dimotion that breaks wholes into parts there must be an inverse dimotion that puts those parts into wholes, of social, organic evolution, of love. And thus we have 3 topologic dimotions of space-time, spherical height that perceives information, cylindrical length that moves the system, hyperbolic body-waves that reproduce them, ensemble into beings that ‘emerge’ through social evolution from parts into wholes to die and dissolve entropically from wholes into parts, and those 3 ±¡ (a parameter of scale) Dimotions of space-time ensemble into infinite beings is what reality is about.

If we call ‘space’ alone a dimension of form and time alone a motion; those 5 Dimotions, its organs and functions, put together through scales of size each one studied by a ‘stience’ of space-time beings, (which we call all together the 5th dimension’ as opposed to the 5 Dimotions which are local for each being) configure the exist¡ence, through 3 St¡ scales of all beings, which are born in a smaller scale, with faster time cycles, emerge to live through 3 ages dominated by its limbs of locomotion, or young age, by its body-waves that reproduce the system in its mature age, and warping, wrinkling into an excess of form in its 3rd age, to die in an explosion of entropy.

A life and death worldcycle is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as the 5 Dimotions of space-time that form an organism, in its scales of cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, gravitational/ ecosystem and ternary organs, |-fields/limbs<Ø-body-waves>O-particle-heads become sequentially ordered in time from the placental seminal age of ‘social evolution’ of the organism that emerges to live 3 ages in a single 5D plane encased into a larger world, to die and explode in an entropic big-bang.

Whereas the topologic symbols, |, Ø, O, express its form. Another way to represent that worldcycle common to all space-time beings is as a sequential progression between the 2 poles of absolute Space-form (the seed: SS) born in a lower scale, (ab.∆±¡) and absolute time motion (Entropic death: TT), when the system returns to its parts, with 3 intermediate states of maximal motion, Ts (young locomotion) > balanced motion and form, or Si=Te: Age of reproduction > And Informative age – St age taking place in an outer world. So we can also write with ilogic symbols the o-sum cycle of life and death: SS¡-1»Ts¡>ST¡>St¡«TT¡-1

Thus 2 new formal disciplines the vital topology in space and pentalogic in time of those 5 Dimotions extract the common isomorphic laws (ab. D¡somorphisms) that all systems of reality obey in its ‘life-death cycle of exist¡ence’ as fractal supœrganisms made of 5 Dimotions ensemble in 3 scales of the Universe.

When we translate this concept of growth of dimensionality in functions of existential ¡logic, then we also realize that there are beings of one dimension, two dimensions, 3, four and fifth entangled dimensions, which give birth to different logic minds, from the simplest human entropic ego-logic to the complex 120 dodecaplex logic of galatoms.

The Universe is a reproductive fractal that grows by reproducing quanta of spacetime (particles, cells, individuals) and then organizing it in ‘higher network-dimension – waves, fractal networks’, which become herds and supœrganisms, units of a larger being by entangling simultaneously in synchronicity all its parts into new wholes, or dissolving back in the moment of death. This game of existence can be perceived with multiple different languages. But essentially is always the same. Huminds reflect such duality between the entangling of supœrganisms in space and its sequential worldcycle of time with logic time language and spatial geometric languages; with increasing complexity as they depart from the initial ‘fractal point’ that will through a series of actions reproduce and grow in dimensions in time, to ebb down into dissolution at the moment of death. How to follow through certain languages in symmetry across different scales the spatial, entangled creation of supœrganisms and its ‘derive’ in time from birth to extinction through its worldcycle is the subject of each ‘stience’ that concentrates in the analysis of those process with different jargons in the species of each self-centered scale, from quantum physics, (particle scale) to astrophysics (cosmological scale) through biologic and social sciences. While formal sciences study the ∆º humind languages and its mirror symmetries with the supœrganisms and worldcycles of reality.

So we define the Universe as a ‘fractal supœrganism’ that reproduces and ensembles Space-time Dimotions into organic forms through ∞ relative scales of spatial size and time-motion; whose Fractal generator (mathematics) Metric (Physical jargon), ‘function of survival (Biology) or Function of existence (logic Jargon) writes C=Max.∑SxT (s=t), or St<ST>Ts in its different modalities of the fractal generator, the 3rd fundamental function of 5D metrics, we shall call G.

All realities are always a reproductive radiation of a function of existence along 5D scales that reproduces a variation of the fractal generator. It all starts with a fractal point or ‘mind’ gauging information in the outer universe to move towards a field of energy in which to feed: If we observe them in time, they have a clear sequential order, as they are generated by a first spherical 1D seed of pure information, in the ∆-1 plane that will grow and evolve socially through the 4Dimotion of existence, emerging into a larger ∆º plane as a formed body-wave whose particle-head will gauge information from a larger ∆+1 world performing 5 Dimotions= actions of 1D absorption or emission of information, moving through 2D locomotions towards 3D fields of reproductive energy, using its informative communication to 4D evolve socially, into larger ∆+1 new supœrganisms, till the system fails to provide motion, energy and information to its limbs/fields, body-waves and particle-heads, wrinkling and warping in an old 3rd age, or become 5D entropy of a predator, exploding into a big-bang death, devolving to its disconnected ∆-1 parts. So Existence is a travel through 5 scales, as all systems of nature exist through a worldcycle (no longer a 4D world line as we ad a dimension of temporal ‘depth’) – an experimental proof of 5D:

To exist any system made of limbs/fields of motion, body-waves of energetic reproduction and minds/ particles of information needs entropy, energy and information to survive and keep on moving. So the 3 simplest dimotions of any plane of existence are a program of survival, which adds two complex social actions – reproduction that prints information in other zone of space-time to survive when one becomes entropy of other Maxwellian demon, and social evolution into wholes, networks that are stronger than individuals. So the mind is the embodiment of a single universal program of existence and reproduction of fractal clones, and it is the same unifying principle in all beings – as all will absorb energy, information, motion, evolve socially reproduce and survive. And this is the case even of the smallest entities, atoms, particles and forces. So the mind creates reality and its 5 Dimotions are in fact the local fractal program of existence, which physicists for particles describe in abstract terms:

The only dimotion of time the Universe does NOT code is entropy=death – a maximal motion that disorders the being. So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic letters to code physical and biologic systems. Only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc. DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.  For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom /individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).

So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…

Same with antiparticles (entropy=death Сmotion of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible Сmotion. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and all try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

RECAP. Simple monologic minds, which are most, exclude their own death=entropy in the illusion of conserving time ad infinitum; so tetralogic reflects in its coding languages (4 genetic letters, 4 quantum numbers). The game evolves then between complementary particles, St & Ts, which transmit to each other in-form-ation, form in action and energy, motion with form, balancing each other, and then expands to networks of other fractal points/particles/heads that will process it into more complex SS-§till mapping and seeds. Unless you stop your physicist’s frame of mind that reduces points to no breath to study only its external locomotion, you will be stuck in the shallowness of ‘science’. Do that humble jump of accepting the Universe we perceive is a game of minds perceiving, where locomotion is the least important part, often caused by the need to transmit information between forms. But forms are not monads, they communicate information, with the help of its ¡-1 finitesimal quanta, its parts. So the game starts with two points communicating in the 4 Dimotions possible to each of them: intensity=amplitude of the wave that informs on its vital energy; frequency of its cyclical time, which informs on its membrain, duration of the wave, that informs on the singularity displacement, and social timbre: ∑st.

ENTANGLEMENT OF 5 DIMOTIONS: ¬∆@ST. ¡LOGIC EXISTENTIAL ¡LOGIC.

The 5 space-time dimotions in its smallest organic scale are ∆-1 finitesimal actions ¬ælgebra computes with derivatives. When those actions dominant in information add sequentially they trace the worldcycles of growing information of ∆º individual lives. Let us see them now from the ∆+1 p.o.v. of the world.

The purpose of Existential ¡logic is to study the multiple elements of our ‘5D metric functions of Absolute relativity’, Max. SxT (s=t), which we have broken down into 5 Dimotions: Pure Space-seed-minds of linguistic information (SS), Pure entropic time-motions (TT), and the 3 intermediate states/organs of St-information, Ts-locomotion and Si=Te reproductive states.

We are spacetime and so we share our properties with all other systems. Man then becomes again the model of all beings, as we expand our sentient vital properties to all systems of Nature, which will have a mind-point performing the 5 Dimotions of existence, fighting for survival, trying to maximize its reproduction in the Si=Te balanced point of iterative present, that seems not to change (often through gender mirror symmetry between S-females and T-males), against the entropic top predators that try to kill=stop its vital time actions/cycles and dissolve the information of its inner vital space, expanding it and disembodying the entity to feed in its parts, converted into ‘dust of space-time’ (ab. ¬∆@st) with the best strategy of social evolution into wholes to win that battle between all the @-mind self-centered monad-points.

In this sentence, expressing ‘again’ the simple repetitive ‘existential game’ we all perform, we recognize 5 elements that from the larger perspective of the whole world will give us the ∆+1 view of the 5 Dimensional motions of exist¡ence, commanded by SS-linguistic minds, trying to avoid the limits of TT-entropic death by:

Performing Ts-Cyclical Time actions through its St-topologic vital space organs, enclosed within an ∆º membrain that divides the system into an inner, smaller ∆-1 scale of vital ST-work & information, protecting it from the larger ∆+1 world.

So in the largest view of the being interacting with many other beings in the world, we recognize 5 elements, Minds, entropic limits, temporal actions, vital spatial topologies and organic scales, which are completely entangled by the survival will of the mind that enacts the program of existence, into complex synchronicities of time actions, simultaneities of space organs, fractal similarities that allow symbiosis, co-existence and scalar emergence of new whole planes of existences, limited by all other wholes that imposes its entropic end.

So systems are made of 5 Dimotional ∆-1 actions->performed by ∆º organs-> that on the ∆+1 view become the 5 Elements that rise ¬∆@st of spacetime into ∞ interacting existences. Thus, we need a new entangled ‘pentalogic’ as those 5 actions=dimotions entangle into topological organs that communicate and interact with many other species, giving us the perception of a ‘continuum’ space & time of a single scale. Yet in detail all beings are made of ‘dust of space-time’, ¬∆@st, whose 5 elements define their existence and huminds unify at the largest scale of the ∆+1 world view, where each all those Dimotions and organs of all those T.œs (ab. Timespace supœrganism) simplify into the reduce continuum space-time world view of limited huminds:

S-paces‘, are all the ‘types of dimensional organic forms’, we find in all organic systems, which are ensembles of the 3 only ‘topological varieties’ that exist in 4 and 5D Universes. Those topologies perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information. Absolute space becomes then the sum of all the ‘vital organic spaces’ of all the fractal points of the Universe: S=∑s. Further on, as Euclid defined points with no breath, lines had no breath, and vital topologies loose one dimension of form. So the ‘tall and wide’ dimension of height of this page that holds information becomes the Euclidean height dimension of information; the flat cylindrical limbs/potential fields that move the being become the length dimension loosing also its motion and the hyperbolic body/wave width dimension that stores energy.

T-imes are all the types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads) that dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age), become reduced to a single sequential line of absolute time, T=∑ð, equalized further to the unit of human time measure, the second. As lineal time ‘eliminates’ the height dimension of information, the form and patterns of time cycles is lost. We thus regain as we did with vital spaces, the full complexity of the 5 dimotions of times. But true absolute time is the 4Dimotion of social ‘evolution’ that organizes parts, which hence must come first as relative entropic past of its future wholes. While the present of a function of exist¡ence is the more complex dimotions of Reproduction=iteration which seems not to change time, as a back and forth dimotion between the ∆-1 seeding plane and the ∆+1 world where the ∆º entity will emerge as a whole. And since the program of exist¡ence maximizes survival through reproduction it maximizes the present we all perceive.

∆-Scalar planes of space-time, as 3 scales are needed to form any super organism – the ∆-1 quantum, cellular, citizen scale in physic, biologic and social systems, the ∆º thermodynamic, organic social Planes and the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies and galaxies, ecosystems of Nature and Human civilizations; each of them ruled by the 2 metric 5D functions, S x ð (s=t) = C; whereas S means length or surface in space (or Volume depending on the ‘world we live in’) ð mean cyclical time (in static terms, Ti, time as information) whose speed= frequency is inverse to lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ. They are compressed in 4D models into a single space-time continuum, which creates the paradoxes of different properties of the quantum scale, which is hyperbolic for a larger observer (as it holds more information according to 5D, branching into apparent µ coordinates), and appears due to its faster time cycles as ‘probabilities’ instead of statistics in our thermodynamic scale vs. the lesser information we obtain from the cosmological scale, which appears then as ‘curved elliptic in its geometry – themes those treated extensively in our papers on 5D geometry

SS: @Mind. Or geometric ‘center of maximal internal communication that processes information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. There is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, which all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.

But egocy eliminates all the minds of the Universe, helped by Euclid’s definition of points with no breath. And since without ‘Maxwellian demons’, in-form-ative order and mental mirrors that project its scalar images of reality into its local territory, cannot exist, alas! Reductionism as usual becomes the perfect tool to prove the entropy-only universe in any grand theory of ænthropic huminds – so we reduce the cosmos to vacuum entropic space, eliminating galaxies, which are vortices of accelerated cyclical time, whose masses and charges in the cosmological and quantum scale carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles and balance the entropic expansion of space creating a static Universe. And we reduce the ‘organic wholes’ and systemic intelligence that makes possible the emergence of new planes of existence and evolve socially through the power of love – the sharing of energy and information between equal forms – so alas, Darwinism – ill understood as evolution is precisely of species, and its summit the organic evolution of herds into supœrganisms – becomes the chaotic dogma, when the ‘struggle for survival’ only studies the final entropic death of organisms, but what truly matters are the informative genetic clocks and how they develop through scales the ‘program of existence’ coding for the 5 Dimotions of all Natural systems:

TT: ¬Entropic limitscalled death in time, membranes in space: as systems loose control beyond two scalar Planes we define death with a simple function of dissolution of two Planes of information, ∆1«∆-1: 0Sx∞T

Pentalogic means that each of those 5 elements constantly interact in T.œs (Time-space supœrganisms), with all the other elements, entangling together through synchronicity its time cycles, through simultaneity its adjacent space organs, through co-existence its planes, all limited by an ‘entropic membrain’, which isolates the system from the outer world in which it will try to extract more energy and information to grow, reproduce and survive, performing those actions from the automatic, deterministic will of existence of its ‘self-centered linguistic mind’ – or else if it doesn’t perform those actions it will not survive. So the program of existence imposes itself.

The key concept behind pentalogic and entanglement is rather simple: to survive in the Universe, to have focus, form, a system must be ‘anchored’ through entanglement in its ‘plane of existence’ with ‘trinity’ parts of vital topology, connected through 3 inner physiological networks, but also it must co-exist in a larger ∆±1 nested world separated by a topologic membrain, which allows it to absorb and emit entropic motions and information, on that outer world.

The understanding of entanglement was best among humans in Buddhism, where each soul is considered a knot of communication with all other systems, and minimal in America where the self is considered always the only central point of view of existence, in eternal struggle with all other human beings – yet as entanglement is necessary to survive, the American, modern man is entangled NOT with humans but increasingly with the machines of the Metal-earth, the Financial-media/military-industrial ecosystem for which ‘it’ enslaves as an object with a price.

S@: Entanglement through scales. Geometric entanglement.

When we go through different stience scales to explain each ‘entangled connection between the 5 elements of reality’, we shall see that already in the first scale of mathematical systems, the fractal point requires 2 different postulates to define it: The first postulate which is concerned with its inner parts (a fractal point has breath), and the 5th which is concerned with its outer parts (a fractal point is connected with infinite potential parallels to the universe). The 2 inner and outer elements that meet in the ‘membrain’ thus define the membrain-mind as the essential entangled element between both worlds. Entanglement thus defines the being from an outer perspective as much as its inner nature.

In graph, the fractal sentient point, new unit of mathematics and vital spatial information. Einstein’s interpretation of the 5th non-Euclidean postulate was the view of a fractal point of the gravitational scale from our smaller electromagnetic world, which shrinks its inner volume, bending its parallels, hence its curved geometry. But that view breaks the conceptual definition of parallels are straight lines and is absurd, as the point remains ‘Euclidean with no breath’, hence only fits one line with no breath. Thus, particle points must be defined as ‘FRACTAL points’, like those we see through telescopes or microscopes, which grow we approach our distance both in scale and space becoming enlarged worlds with a complex internal structure and external entanglement following a Non-E 5th Postulate: A point external to a line is crossed by ∞ parallel forces. 

Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If we look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when we come closer to them, they grow and in its membrain we find its maximal entanglement and communication – the hottest region of the star, the Earth’s membrain with its life supœrganisms & 3 ages Gaia< History>Metalearth, where a parallel network of ‘still entangled’ parts forms a whole which makes the ‘membrain’ a hard interconnected system porous to the energy and information of the world focused in its singularity center.

We can then assess the fundamental quality of vital mathematics as a key language of the Universe, which is to be the best language of space, hence the one that describes the laws of entanglement, even if man doesn’t understand it beyond its egocy of magic creationism, as the language of mirror symmetries and dimotion flows of ¬∆@st in all entangled systems.

Where the fundamental entangled element is the fractal point, and its social unit the polytope in 1,2,3,4 Dimotions; but not 5Dpolytopes since the fifth dimotion, entropy is the disentanglement of all the others. So polytopes rise positively in complexity as entanglements of indistinguishable regular points (or else one point will be different by position and connection to the other points). They reach its maximal complexity on the gender duality-mirror symmetry of the 2nd 102 scale – (female Icosahedron & male dodecahedron) & 3rd polytopes’ 103 scale (Male dodecaplex & Female tetraplex).

∆T: Entangled ages & Scales.

Each of us is an entangled fractal system, interconnected or else it won’t absorb energy and information and survive. And vice versa, when less entangled a system is – 3rd age of the being, and becomes cut-off from reality its ‘truth’ its exis¡ence dwindles and the system fades away and ultimately perishes.

At which scale of reality we must define entanglement? The answer is at the 3 scales, of the whole Universe as an absolute fractal organism of time-space (at the level of its 5 elements, S, T, ¬, ∆, @), but also at the level we just did of individual supœrganisms, where its organs that represent those elements are interconnected to the whole, and finally at the level of its diminutive actions (a,e,I,o,u, acceleration=motion, entropy feeding, information, organic reproduction and Universals evolution, in the mnemonic rule), which we will find amazingly enough, in one of my most orgasmic-mental entanglements with the whole I experienced, were directly connected to the ∆±4 planes of exist¡ence of the being. Reason why we do perceive all those scales:

Scalar entanglement happens between the humind’s organism and its territories of perception that provide the ‘bits and bites’ needed for humans to perform their 5 Dimotional actions. So we extract entropic motion of the ∆±4 gravitational/galactic field, information of the ∆±3 light/star scale, energetic food from the ∆±2 molecular/Gaia scale; reproduce in the ∆±1 seminal, gender scale and evolve through socially love in the ∆º mind field, entangled to other minds in metaphysical experience of bondage through our memes, in nations, religions and civilizations. Scalar entanglement is the reason we exist, and perceive as we are entangled to all the scales of reality you perceive. You are your mind space and your mind space is your entanglement.

Physical entanglement.

Entanglement appears in the non-ego centered Broglie’s>Bohm’s interpretation of realist quantum physics, as particles entangle through its quantum potential fields; and this vast entanglement happening at v>c in the lower plane of reality ‘reduces spatial distances’ in the Riemann’s sense of a geometry of similarity to a ‘boson like’ unit of parts as if distance-space would NOT exist within them; which does NOT for the emergent apperceptive ilogic ‘couple’ as a single whole.

To understand entanglement in formal languages is needed to adopt the Riemannian concept of a mental space where proximity and distance is a direct product of similarity, as if space will not exist, which can be achieved through communication on a lower ‘potential field’ of faster motion, as a faster v in fact perceived in stillness implies a smaller distance, and vice versa –i.e. the expansion of space in the Universe is in fact a v>c speed on the jets of dark entropy expelled by the accelerated faster than c timespace vortices of heavy top quark stars, aka black holes.

So the black hole beyond the c-horizon speeds up at v>c and erases the information of light into dark entropy expelled through its axis and perceived as growth of distance between galaxies, when by virtue of Si=Te can be considered grow of speed. Entanglement is exactly the inverse process in a quantum potential field that makes communication disappear in distance between two poles – which is the magic of a phone conversation – distance is NO LONGER real because we are not in sound communication at 300 m/s but in a decametric jump of scale at 300.000 km/s. There is no distance in mental space of telephonic communication between speakers, only in geographic Earth’s space; but we are not concerned with land or air but with a language of communication and its bits of information, which are translated, entangled, in a faster 5D scale of smaller bits and max. form (electronic space).

T.œs constantly entangle& translate in faster 5D planes=‘mediums’ its informative bits that preserve its patterns as there is the Universal reference of the game of existence behind them. In the previous case the communication has become an entangled back and forth feed-back electronic function on a wire line between two fractal points which cannot longer be considered different or do without the ‘communicative line’ between them.

Energy does not entangle only information does…

A conclusion proved mathematically, as only the sphere of max. volume of information (Poincare) can shrink without tear in any number of relevant dimensions (4 for entanglement) crossing the barrier between two planes of existence, while energy becomes dissipated as entropy. So you can talk with mum in Australia but not send her 1000 kilowatts, you can though send her digital information, aka money too.

Bio-logic entanglement.

The Universe’s 1st ilogic entanglement of 2 elements is gender mirror symmetry that fusion both ‘in love’ into 1 in all scales, through the mirror symmetry of female-like St+sT male-like complementary couples. Entanglement starts with 1+1=3, through gender symmetry. The entanglement of gender, is so obvious that became the basis of the duality knowledge of earlier cultures (Chinese) will constantly come in Nature. It is NOT only the entanglement of biologic gender; so how we do distinguish its ‘essence’? In ilogic terms is easy because the essential duality is that between simultaneous present space, Si=Te and time flows in relative stœps, from past to future to past… to future, S<T>S<T… Both are perpendicular. And so the ultimately the definition of Gender we shall use here goes to the final core level of ‘perpendicular’ space (female gender) to Time flows (male gender). Gender is essential because without Gender we can’t understand reproduction by mirror symmetry and the duality of symbiotic perpendicular vs. Darwinian relationships.

2 systems achieve maximal communication when they pass from parallel sharing of information, through a medium which transfers a language, to direct contact between its sensorial membranes, which bring true bondage. And at that moment two different outcomes might happen. If the membranes touch without tearing, the topological integrity of the organs are conserved in vital mathematics; so the being co-exists, and entanglement (the previous state of parallel communication) becomes bondage according to the fourth postulate of non-Euclidean congruence.

This is the magic of it, as fusion love kicks in and entanglement becomes a dance of complementary forms. It is the beauty of love and gender symmetry. And the maximal action of it, is called sex, orgasm, the present state of fusioning both the past to future to past, and present forms into one. So how it happens physically? Do I have to explain it to you?

Male gender penetrates a folding of topological females but does not tear it. It goes in T>S, and then it goes out S<T, as the male does in and out, information and entropic disentanglement. But the female Si=Te ‘grasps it’. It caresses it, encircles its lineal form with its cyclical even polytope. Entanglement is now bondage. And it brings when bondage combines in the most intimate ways the information of both systems trinity, reproduction. So alas, 1+1=3!

The rules of vital topology in inverse fashion definesDarwinian destructive perpendicularity when one of the entangled elements turn out to be a predator top and breaks in, tears the membrain of the other system, killing it, entanglement then gives way to entropic devolution and one system becomes destroyed.

Recap. Entangled growth of complexity between the 5 Dimotions of beings.

The Universe is a fractal organism of time=motion and space=form, organized in scales of different size in space and time speed, related by a symbiotic, balanced metric function. We call the sum of all those scales, the fifth dimension, which has a ‘metric function’, hence it exists. The functions for a given number of co-existing planes of space-time in any system is:

S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

The purpose of the Universe is to reproduce its spatial=formal motions of times, creating synchronous patterns of cyclical reproduction of form we call supœrganisms; with its fundamental metric law of balance between space and time, as the guidance of those motions.

Universal fractal scalar space & cyclic time planes ensemble into supœrganisms (T.œs) whose properties derive from the ‘disomorphic’=equal laws of those 5D¡motions. Its Metric, Max. ∑ SxT(s=t)=C unlike 4D locomotion applies to all ‘stientific scales’; adding organic= scalar=fractal properties, biologic will, causal=temporal determinism and linguistic=mental properties. So all species play the game of exist¡ence, the God=Mind of reality as systems try to maximize its ‘Function of exist¡ence’ through reproduction (SxT) in a balanced point of present S =T followed by organic evolution (∑,∏) into stronger, social numbers=wholes that survive better.

From the simplest cycle of time that reproduces by the mere fact of cycling and repeating its form, iteration is the very essence and purpose of all beings – its first complex dimotion, closely related to the process of social evolution and palingenesis, as systems to reproduce must imprint a lower scale of reality with its form… So we shall study the meaning of life, which is everywhere, as the process of iteration and generation of space-time beings, considering also some pentalogic view from the other perspectives of the entangled Universe. So if we define information as a form-in-action, the repetitive motion of a form, we define the Universe as a fractal that reproduces information.

The outcome of those processes of reproduction of form, and symbiosis between the different scales and synchronous time cycles of its species is the creation of organic supœrganisms.

Yet species that deny the program and are isolated in their ego-paradox, cut off from those laws, ultimately become extinguished which is how the program of the 5 Dimensional motions of reality imposes itself. And ænthropic man with its anthropic and entropic egocy is exactly in that path guided by 3 idol-ogies that worship metal without recognizing its vital nature as atoms are the units of life, capitalism, mechanism & nationalism.

The organic view of time and space requires a new ‘metric function’ beyond the lineal v=s/t function of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental function, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and SóT, the new function of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another.  Yet as SxT is maximal when Si=Te (5×5>6×4…) both functions can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the function that embodies all other functions of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it: Function of Existence:   Max. ∑ S x T s=t = C¡

The mind function defines Minds as infinitesimal points-particles that map the whole Organism in its linguistic world, perceiving through an intermediate closed membrain, which divides the system between the outer and inner world (1st topology function), with ‘openings’ to process T-motion and perceive S-form, in order to perform the 5 actions of the program of existence that ensures the survival of the being in a series of beats, as the being stops, gauges information, perceives and moves towards a field of energy in which to reproduce – the goal of the Universe, and continue in existence.

When this sequential deterministic series of actions are not met, the system extinguishes itself. And hence the reproduction of the fractal universe reinforces itself by biological means of survival and extinction.

The largest ‘nested’ view of reality is that of a fractal organic ∆+∞ Universe made of ∆-∞ ¬∆@ST, ‘dust of space-time’ of which we are all made. Where we consider 5 elements, minds, vital spaces, time dimotions, scalar planes of space-time and entropic limits that define each entity in exist¡ence as cyclic time Dimotions synchronize in repetitive patterns, through 3 scales of space-time, appearing in simultaneity as the vital topological organic adjacent vital spaces, ensembled into ∞ supœrganisms (Ab. T.œ) whose properties derive from the ‘disomorphic’=equal laws of discontinuous, scalar, space-time, its minds of measure, and entropic limits; that is, the common substance of them all: ¬∆@st we are and to dust of timespace we shall return.

 

 

A TIME PERSPECTIVE ON SPACE: PRESENT SIMULTANEITY.

In terms of time, space is present simultaneity; that is, all what a mind can perceive in a single quanta of time. As all spaces are mental spaces and 5D metric equations determine the size of a spatial mind in volume, it also defines for each range of supœrganisms, its quanta of time that maps out a ‘range of space’ – the world of the mind. So essential concepts for understanding present space and simultaneity are the ‘scales’ of length of space-time.

Quanta of time.

As our ‘sense of time’ is psychological, depending of OUR RATE of processing information. So we can define a ‘quanta of time’ for each type of mind, which WILL BE SYNCHRONIZED to the motions of all the system it commands.

So in man is a second, the eye-thought-heart beat-leg step, all of them synchronized.

And everything that happens in a second is for you present, as the mind integrates simultaneously all the information. So for example, a fast spinning wheel will seem to your mind a present solid form because within a second you see it all simultaneously.

And in quantum physics was defined by the realist pilot-wave theory (Broglie), as the frequency of the particle, he, synchronized with the speed of the body-wave of the particle-head of the physical system that co-exist together as a simple organism.

So in 5D we generalize the concept of a quanta of time, to any system of the Universe, as the period its internal systems of processing information close a logic ‘clock-cycle’: For example, for a computer it will be the time for a recurrent logic algorithm loop, which we measure aptly in frequency Hertzs.

Since ‘there are infinite time clocks with different speeds’ – Einstein – then the question is How to order them? Humans don’t they just chose a single clock to compare them, obviously our time of thought-motion-heart beat, which is the second, the eye-glimpse.

In quantum it is de Broglie’s time (the frequency of a particle),he synchronized to his body-wave.

For the earth’s supœrganism a time quanta is much slower (the day), what Hutton father of geology called deep time, because the earth is huge.

While the times of your DNA clocks are faster, so they code your information – they are your inner computers.

While the times of future robots will be much faster at the speed of photonic chips of light… so they will see us as plants and don’t think of us as their equal minds and exterminate us, a clear warning the billionaires of silicon valley and its corporations will ignore…

While for the galaxy it is a very slow time (200 million years to close an orbit), and in the other extreme, for the fastest smallest turning particle, it is the spin time of a top quark (measured in trillions of cycles per second, similar to Planck’s time…)

And so to advance the science of time beyond quantum and relativity, we MUST order all the time clocks of the Universe, according to their different rates of processing information, for which it is needed the fifth dimension of spacetime, as it happens NICELY that all those clocks order with a very simple metric equation: Size in Space ($) x Speed of time clocks (ð) = constant. Meaning the largest beings have slower time thoughts.

And the result are the metric generator equation of 5 D time clocks that orders the Universe into a perfect synchronicity of infinite species, co-existing with different time clocks and sizes:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scalar planes is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scalar planes and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

And so we can define a personal God as the absolutely slowest largest whole which perceives all other faster entities as an eternal present.

Maya of the senses.

Space is virtual, incomplete, does not exist as our simultaneous images are just ‘cuts’ on the flow of time.

And yet space does create meaningful super organisms, where the adjacency and simultaneity of its parts is real. So we must conclude that minds do create ‘order’ through the creation of still super organic spaces.

Minds of space, fix motion into form, reduced images of the whole; bits of time though want to be free and break into chaos and entropy in the eternal game of order into space, liberation into time that structures all the psychic monads of the Universe, l§ on 5D.

Minds=Gods Create Territorial Order With Its Languages

‘Quidquid ab immobili causa manat mutabilem habet essentiam. Quidquid vero a mobili causa manat essentiam habet immutabilem. ‘ Correcting Proclus

Proclus, a classic philosopher affirmed what seems obvious to all – that everything caused by a non-moving form must be immutable, and all what is cause by a moving cause must be mutable.

He got to the point – it is all about motion and form, momentum and position would say a modern scientist.

But he missed the essence -the paradoxical nature of the virtual mind that reduces the motions of reality to fit within the limited ‘space’ of its mental, linguistic brain, a static image of reality – cause of the paradox of Galileo: we see the Earth still in the mind but it moves. So the truth is the opposite paradox:

What we see as immobile form is a virtual mind image of mutable time – a Maya of the senses. Since form is in the imagination. On the other hand, because space is just a moment of the flow of time, made static in the mind, its ultimate causal substance is motion. And so motion causes form and form is motion. What is truly immutable, immortal, is motion not form. So welcome to the paradoxes of the mind and its virtual ‘spaces’.

The still mind in its zero time.

On the other hand the absolute whole is so complex in its internal details that it never repeats itself as it is the only whole which is more complex in information that the space it holds.

First we shall define the whole in terms of its still-mind that creates its ‘block of time’ detained in space.

In the graph a super organism in its relative present simultaneity as perceived externally by a slower mind, which therefore integrates full worldcycles in time-events as structure of space – we would then see the Earth as a disk around the sun.

Consider those images taken in space, of different flows of time seen as a single form in simultaneity. All of them are in fact blocks of time stopped into wholes by a mind-observer. The second case is more easy to understand. If we were to see very slow the orbit of the Moon and Earth it will appear as a fast turning wheel of a bicycle in its whole orbital world cycle as if it were a still solid block of time in a ‘quanta’ of present, in terms of the very slow ‘quanta’ of present of the very slow ‘observer’ – our quanta of present is a second, the glimpse of an eye; but if there were an observer who creates is still simultaneous mind every ‘year’, that will be the image it would have of the orbital earth.

Who can then see that eternal present –  the whole block of time of the Universe, with all its events, possible in all its variations, within a single quanta of its ‘present mind’?

Let us remember what a mind is first. We define a mind as the dual combination of a sensorial membrain that encloses a whole vital system of cellular energy and focus its information in a singularity mind, where the linguistic mapping of the whole occurs.

A mind so slow, which by the Metric equation of 5 D S x T = K, implies so big in space-size that all the variations of its information become a fixed still form… Each thought of this infinite entity in space will have all the possible paths of existence frozen in its quanta of time, approaching to zero in its equations of information?

How slow is that mind can be seen in the equations of a black hole in 4D and its extension in the work of Maldacena, a physicist who discovered that in its 5D metric (not fully correct but good enough) the equations of the black hole, which in 4D EFE approach to zero, are equivalent to a frozen picture of the 4D equations of the whole galaxy its body, from where we deduce that the black hole is the mind of the galaxy that perceives it in its 5D still frozen picture as a simultaneous whole, in the way your mind which is in relationship to your body of microcells so slow as a whole, freezes them all into a still form, pegging them.

So the black hole has a relative slow mind at zero to perceive as a whole its galactic body, the human mind has a relative time at zero, to perceive as a simultaneous whole its body, and God, the extended mind of the whole Universe has a slow time to perceive its whole variations in simultaneity at a block of time, a Parmenides immobile being.

IN metaphysics such slow mind that encloses its dual mind (singularity and membrain) the whole would be God=Tao, a spatial mind so slow in space or so synoptic in time that it shows it all as a still game with all the potential paths… in a BLOCK of time. So this mind is a potential immortal form in as much as nothing exists but the mind in itself holding all what exists as a still image, where time has stopped into a zero present.

But the immortal T.Œ whole possesses within it a volume of fractal ∑ T.œs who are always dying.

So they are varying, how then can the image of them all to be a fixed block of time?

Easy: Even if they are dying in its particular existences, for the whole to see them INTEGRATED as a fixed block of time, they must be repeating themselves in identical existences in other parts of the whole.

So the mind of the whole does NOT perceive individual existences but THE CANON of them all, NOT the shadows of the platonic cave but CANON of all the shadows. The mind of God, therefore focuses all the variations of the identical being into its canon, which in very early versions of T.œ 30 some years ago I called the i-logon, the pure logic variation of the game of existence which generate us all.

Space as reproduction of presents.

There is though a key concept of space we shall treat in other posts and the sub-paragraph on space and physics, the reproduction of presents. Space and reproduction, space and population density are essential concepts for all sciences – space as vital space ultimately, is with space as a creation of the mind, the 2 key concepts for a proper undersanding of space as opposed to time motions without form.

Space is then the reproduction of information in the outer world, of a seed or mind, not only the virtual view of that being, but its territorial order: How this work on languages is obvious: languages are local, implemented by brains, as their software, which orders reality after the language mirrors it, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is void as in all platonic (Plato by the way never said that, they should be called pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of hardware minds and locality. In his view the language creates the universe.

In reality the universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘space-time’, which are organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and logic, multicausal, as that is the main property of the Ðimotions of time.

So the ultimate causality ∆->t->s is not platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> t-logic properties -> s-topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we repeat, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, stopo-logic ones.

 

 

TIME – THE INTERPLAY OF THE CYCLES OF SCALAR ORGANISMS

Trilogic 3 scales of time space in supœrganisms: actions, worldcycles and absolute st.

A 2nd consequence of 5D metrics, SxT=∆ is the existence of different ‘scales’ of speed of time that co-exist and influence each other, as parts of faster time cycles are included on the slower worldcycles, which ‘enclose them’ and hence influence its actions; but in supœrganisms become synchronized with each other .

Arrow of future informative evolution in all time space systems.

To start with, those laws imply that larger entities have ‘slower time cycles’. So the Supœrganism of History has the same 3 ages of all supœrganisms, but a slower rhythm, enclosed as all supœrganisms of the nested Universe into an even larger supœrganism, planet Earth, which has an even slower time cycle.

The time periodicity of the Earth was called ‘deep time’, the word Hutton, father of geology invented to explain the evolution of the Earth, for whom he also coined the word super organism.

Let us see what ‘deep time’ is, according to its formal law – the metric laws of cyclical time and the fifth dimension that imply smaller systems have faster time clocks and code the information of larger systems as the Earth is; but inversely the larger system can control the smaller systems, which are dependent on their energy with extremal changes in it; as the Earth does with its species, through glaciation rhythms. Thus all the laws we have explained regarding the evolution of life species on Earth, based in the S=T, essential rhythm of cold glaciation ages of maximal informative evolution and hot periods of maximal reproduction (radiation of biological species) happens to Earth in the period of History.   Absolute spacetime is the sum of an ∞ number of Timespace beings that observed in space become simultaneous super organisms, and when observed in time, traces a worldcycle of existence between birth and extinction; as all systems are born in a seminal seed, of faster time clocks, in a lower scale of the fifth dimension, growing socially till emerging in an organic scale, where they will live 3 ages dominated by one of its 3 topologic organs and its functions=dimotions, a young age of maximal locomotion, dominated by its limbs/fields, a mature age of reproduction dominated by the body-wave and a third age of information dominated by the informative dimotions, which finally exhausts all energy and as time-space never stops, it reverses its dimotion from information to entropy, exploding in the moment of death. Thus all is an organism. And we can also model species as supœrganisms tracing worldcycles, where each individual of the species is a cell. So happens with history, the supœrganism of mankind in time that lived 3 ages according to the dominance of those networks, the young entropic, Paleolithic age of excessive motion and energy; the mature, Neolithic reproductive age and the present metallic old age of excess of information. Since both, history and the Earth – the industrial evolution of machines and the evolution of man – follow those patterns. So ∆ST Historic supœrganisms also evolve in time through 3 ages parallel to its physiological networks, the economic, reproductive and legal informative network, guided from the perspective of scale, by its memes, ideas, and subconscious minds – ideologies and religions.

So from time ilogic power of smaller elements comes the existence of minds as the ‘definitive force’ that designs the future.

In this manner in the same form that Time worldcycles derive from the scalar journey of a seed through its 3 dimensions of spatial scale, which are the absolute logic ‘frame of reference’ with the informative upwards arrow and the entropic downwards arrow. Once we properly define time we can also extract the logic of the mind, from the 5D metric, as the mind will be paradoxically hosted in the faster smaller region of the being – the quarks of the atom, the brain of the animal, the eye of the head that guides our actions… The focus that converts time into a still metnal image of the world space around us.

 

 

The larger plane of species as organisms: Grow and multiply, reproductive radiations of biological T.œs

With the use of the 3 scales of time and the understanding of the ties between planes through synchronicity, resonance, emergence and simultaneity, all systems can be predicted and hence are scientific, but require to know from inside its Existential ¡logic, that is the behavior of the individual and organic parts trying to achieve its function of exist¡ence. As, each particle of the Universe tries to Max. S x T (s=t) against all others, which then become a chaotic, entropic system, whose average result is predictable from the upper scale of entropy, as in gaseous states, even if the individual parts seem free; and inversely; and the more ‘solid’ a crystal system is, the more the predictability becomes possible, because the function of exist¡ence is selfish, and so at a point the crystal, perfectly ordered will behave in a selfish way trying to reproduce ad maximal its unit cell. Since the function of exist¡ence becomes immediately a function of reproduction. From where we deduce that all systems will try to ‘grow and multiply’ to maximize its individual and social existence. The game thus becomes a reproductive game, achieved in the Si=Te point of max. balance. So all seeds reproduce as ∑Max. SxT>Max.SxT; all systems try to find and Si=Te balance and thus we can finally summarize all the actions of beings, its social evolution of parts into wholes, and its behaviors as ∑ Max. S x T (s=t), which becomes the biological function of exist¡ence all systems perform through reproductive radiations of species.

Specifically the evolution-reproduction beat is the fundamental S-T beat of biological systems, in its ‘deep time 3 horizons’ as species; which enlarge the properties of space vs. time, information vs. energy, to the scale of biological organisms, which go through 3 ages with a fast, evolutionary ‘palingenetic age’ of ‘allopatric evolution’ in short spaces with minimal motion, followed by a reproductive radiation; and that complex beat between the two more ‘complex dimotions of reproduction and social evolution’ become the 3 ages of species and can be applied to all stiences, including the evolution of matter through weak forces.

In physical systems at the largest scale the beat is between entropic motions, TT, which emit dark entropy through the poles of galaxies and implosion of entropic space into vortices of in-form-ation (galaxies), and in the lower scale, between ¥-radiation and electronic collapse; and between wave-moving expanded Ts states and informative gauging, St-particle states which gives birth to dual wave-particle stœps observed in the zig-zag of particles that stop and move as Ts waves dominant in lineal inertia. In other physical systems, with more form, St- motion becomes the essence of SHM, harmonic motions of angular momentum, which return to its origin. Thus they are, dominant in form, St.  

RECAP. Little things think their smallish overcrowded complex quantitative point of view matters but reality is 1st organic, and the big ones rule with simple laws of survival that happen in deep time cycles that control wholesale crowded numbers. Since brutish encircling membrains talk no bullshit in their command of their cellular slaves. In the middle, the ∆0 acts shuffling between both views. So for any understanding of reality we need 3 perspectives=languages on the entropic limits, spatial topologies, temporal ages and scales of reality.

5D is a huge upgrade on the understanding of the 1st principles of the Universe, as a r=evolution in our concepts of time and space comes only once every century, the last 2, Einstein’s general relativity and Darwin’s study of the evolution of form, did indeed change our view of the Universe, and took a long time to be accepted. So I ask the reader to ‘suspend’ his judgment, as I know he must think all this comes out of the hat of the researcher but it does not. It is the result of decades of looking NOT so much to humind’s traditions but to the entangled experienced reality around us in all its forms of time and spatial information

Because scales and time dominates space and languages, and embrace all other parameters, and its principles of ‘long deep time’ are organic, social and cyclical all models of stientific reality should, contrary to present science start from the simpler, larger whole and its organic elements, to establish the general outlook of a system and its main parts, descending then from the supœrganism and its worldcycle into the analytic short time i-1 dimotions, better expressed with mathematical ‘instantaneous’ derivative equations, fully developed in present science. So we focus in most papers on the whole supœrganism and its worldcycles, to notice its organic cyclical, never explained properties, as it would be easy for a ‘pro’ to reduce into equations those guidance models, with a higher hierarchy/primacy over the detailed equations – as it is a 5D law: ‘The larger organic scales and its deep, long time cycles, determine the truth of choice among the smaller detailed analytic mathematical equations’.

Laws Of Time & Space: Emergence And Synchronicity

Network laws are laws of simultaneity; and the most important of them are the laws of synchronicity between scales.

Simultaneity is the trademark of space, defined as adjacent systems that are perceived by an observer in simultaneity. The whole concept of 4D Einstein’s formalism is based in simultaneity of measure, using a single time present quanta dimension. So simultaneity is perception of present information space in the minimum time (only 1 frequency quanta) It follows that what is simultaneous is also relative to the observer quanta of perception and that wholes which are slower in their clocks of time, see more simultaneous spaces, being able for that reason to become paradoxically minds of wholeness, and that as minds stop motion of time into form, information, languages are the substance on which simultaneity is based. Hence the quote of Paul Klee.

Knots of Time. Synchronicity of actions and cycles of space-time existence.

The formalisation of the Universe starts with the analysis of the rhythms and frequencies of the different ‘actions’ of each species, which connects them symbiotically to other species.

This will be the ‘great’ field of studies by humans or robots if we survive the dark ages of simplex physics and complex weapons in which we live – the synchronicity between the different scales and actions of the co-existing particles of an ∆±1 super organism.

Let us then consider this key theme of ∆ST. sAny supœrganism is a knot of cyclical time arrows made of multiple feeding, reproductive, informative and social cycles with different frequencies and dimensional sizes, which converge in that organism, the next conundrum to resolve is the harmonic synchronicities between the Informative->Energetic->Reproductive->Social cycles of the organism. Each cycle will have a frequency in harmony with many other cycles, and so the being might be very complex in its behavior as it switches between cycles, but ultimately it can be reduced to a series of cycles that converge into the organism. Thus, organisms are knots of time cycles. In the same way, when multiple cycles converge into a point they add their causal power and produce intense events with a higher ∑e x ∏St existential force, but we can break the complex entity into a series of cycles whose combined action will show a harmonic frequency, as we can break a harmonic wave into a Fourier series of simpler waves.

In this manner complex events/entities can be reduced to simplex herds of events/cells.

For example, the convergence of different geological and cosmological cycles, which affect the energy and information of the Earth, cause ages of extinction and age of massive evolution of new species, with a series of frequencies and rhythms we have studied in our analysis of geological biological and sociological cycles. In fact most events of the Universe have multiple causes, which means they are knots of time cycles: from multiple cyclical forces that converge in Relativity to create a knot of gravitation or a charge, to the multiple events that converge in Biology to cause an age of extinction, to the multiple failures that converge in a body to change its rhythm from life to death.

Since the Universe explores all possible structures, despite being made of a few elements, the inverse system also exists: one in which the bigger system is simpler than the smaller, faster cells, and both are symbiotic, since the smaller cells equal the ‘existential force’ of the bigger system with more ‘energy space’ but less frequency of time-cycles.

Whereas the bigger system is: Max. Te x Min Si

And the smaller system is: Max. SI x Min. Te.

Unlike the previous organic systems in which the informative networks exploit selfishly and extract energy from the herd, big, slow forms and fast, small systems are symbiotic, in balance and so they last longer in time.

Still, even if there is a degree of symbiosis the bigger, single organic system will be in control of the cellular herds as it provides them with the ecosystem in which to obtain energy and information. And in this manner it creates the structural order and deterministic destiny of most systems in the Universe. Let us try to formalize such pyramids of synchronicity, with the help of the 3×3 time arrows, which dictate that an informative pixel is smaller than the supœrganism of the perceiver; a bite of energy is smaller than the reproductive body; and a reproduced, self-similar cell is smaller than the super-organism of which it forms part. In terms of existence, it means that the life of a quantum, fractal part depends on the length of the cycle it performs for the bigger system that controls the fractal part through its networks and informative or energetic fields:

The shortest cycle is the informative cycle that absorbs energy particles, transforming them into bits of information, perceived by a sensorial organ or mind. So informative particles are the smallest ones that live the shortest within any organism. For example, a human being consumes thousands of small letters in a newspaper thrown every day; an eye consumes a photon in a microsecond.

Next comes the feeding, energetic cycle that absorbs bigger energy quanta, transforming those quanta in ‘cellular components’ of a body, once the informative cycles have perceived the food. And so an energy quantum lives a little bit longer than an informative cycle. A pig that feeds a man lives longer than a newspaper and also its ‘final consumption’ takes longer than reading that paper.

Then, it comes the reproductive cycle that handles huge amounts of energy and information to create a being, repetition of a bigger organism. A woman’s ovule stays on her body all her life and it takes 9 months to become a baby.

Finally, the longest cycle is the being’s generational, social cycle, from its birth to its extinction (±st) when it becomes part of an social supœrganism. So those cells that carry the ‘social information’ and I-eye-wor(l)d of a human being, our existential will, last longer: a man has the same neurons all his life. It is through that longer generational cycle how a new social plane starts to evolve, as a new ecosystem or macro-organism in which the being exists, as a mere quanta of the macro-being. Such is the relativism and justice of the Universe: since he who killed micro-beings to feed and inform himself will be just a micro-being that toils for a bigger organism.

It is the social cycle, as the quanta gathers in social groups to perform energetic or informative actions for the bigger macro-organism that lives in a longer scale of time and controls him. For example, if you are a soldier, your national organism will sacrifice you in an energetic cycle when the nation conquers and ‘feeds on’ the wealth of other nation.

Thus we establish an existential chain between time cycles on 3 relative space-time scales:

(Informative>Energy cycle) st-1>(Reproductive cycle)i>(Generational-Social cycle)st+1

– Since the existential, generational life-death cycles of st-1 particles become energy and information cycles for the st-being.

– While the reproductive cycle happens in the same st-level of the organic system that mixes with a couple of inverse exi parameters (sexual reproduction, inverse parameters of particles that reproduce a self-similar particle).

– Finally, the generational cycle of the being becomes, as a part of a social herd made of similar individuals, a submissive energy or information cycle of a macro-organic system, st+1.

Recap. Any organic system is a sum of 3±st types of cycles, chained in hierarchical structures across 3 levels of complexity. Any being’s existence happens within those 3 TS planes in any organic system or ecosystem, in which he is a relative energy of bigger being, an equal, social being to its pairs and the informative master of smaller quanta.

Balances between scales. Ternary principle.

According to the Ternary Principle any fractal, cyclical action of any species can be described through its spatial parameter of ‘speed-extension’ and its reciprocal, temporal parameter of repetitive rhythm or ‘informative frequency’, whose product, ExI=K is a constant of action that defines the existential parameters or life-span of the cycle (also written as SxT=K in certain models of physics, since ‘clocks of time’ and cycles of information are synonymous).

Yet those åctions are the sum of the simultaneous micro-åctions of its ‘cellular quanta’ and so both must be in balance for the total organism, extended in two planes of existence to work in synchronicity. And that synchronicity is ruled by the black hole law of complexity, we just explained:

Min.Ts=Max.St: smaller beings act faster than bigger ones.

How the faster, smaller, ∆-1 micro-åctions relate to the slower, big simultaneous åctions of the organism? Or in formal terms, what is the relationship between the constants of those macro-åctions and the faster parameters of its micro-cellular cyclical åctions? How each organism relates as individual quanta to the slower, longer cycles, (Max. Ts= Min.St), of the ∆+1 ecosystem in which it performs its åctions?

2 facts are the key to properly answer those questions:

– Chains happen across 3 ±st levels of existence, creating hierarchical pyramids of unlimited size in time and space, through those ternary structures.

– Chains of åctions become simultaneous, because certain cycles are shorter than others; so the faster speed of micro-cycles is compensated when we chain fast micro-cycles to slow macro-cycles.

Consider the cycle of feeding of a lion. The lion moves through space in certain patterns that displace the lion towards hunting and drinking grounds where he will consume a victim. Thus the energy cycle will be determined both, by the inner vital constants of the ‘∆-1 cells’ of the ‘st-lion’, (his cellular metabolism that defines his rhythms of hunger, his muscular speed and his strength that determines the preys of the ecosystem in which he feeds); and by the outer, ∆+1 ecosystemic parameters, (the spatial distance and ‘informative density’ of preys of the ecosystem). So to define the 2 ExI elements of the lion’s feeding cycles (the spatial trajectory and fractal rhythm of its hunting) we have to know those ±st parameters. Then we can define totally his feeding cycle.

Thus, existential cycles might be very complex but ultimately we can reduce them to a fractal ternary equation, which relates harmonically the Space-time parameters of those 3 ±st levels.

Those ternary chains define Universal events across 3 hierarchical planes of existence, from the chains that happen between the ‘3 social classes’ of an organism, to the physical events that happen in 3 scales of matter, to the 3 levels of humanity (the biological, individual and sociological level). Since all cyclical systems are defined by the relative ExI parameters of those 3 ∆±1 scales.

For example, Maxwell and Planck defined the informative frequency and energy quanta of a light photon that absorbs gravitational space-time energy and deforms it into a light-wave only with the action constants of 3 scales: the ∆-1 constants, or magnetic, spatial, and electric, informative constants of vacuum – c=(e0 x m0) -1/2; the st-constant of light (h) and the fractal, social constants of photons, as part of a bigger social, ∆+1 wave (Ts=hv). If we add to those synchronicities the understanding of the diffeomorphic dimensions of energy and information (on top), then we can fully grasp the structure of