Home » ‘I<I4I:galaxy » @: philosophy of physics

@: philosophy of physics

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

Advertisements

SUMMARY

I. T.ΠVS. T.O.E

II. Absolute relativity of scales vs. Constructivism.

III. Conservation principles.

IV. 5D Fractal Universe: Organic properties: Dimotions, scales & Disomorphisms.

V. Wordlines vs. worldcycles. Correspondence Principles.

 VI. ¬Æ Stientific method: realism vs. creationism.

 

5D TOPO-BIO-LOGIC T.Œ

v  1Ð T.O.E.

Man is the measure of all things, as the most perfect super organism we can observe in full detail, unlike the physical super organisms of galatoms… Further on for ethic, survival reasons – the ultimate mandate of the Universe – we should care more about man than the machine. The opposite is truth due to the idol-ogical egocy of our technological civilization

T.œ means a Theory of Everything Organic (œ) and also a Time§pace Organism. As usual in the upgrading new paradigm of the fractal Universe we slightly change the classic wording of ‘sciences’ by those of ‘stienœ’ – the study of space-time supœrganisms. This of course confuses lineal one-dimensional thinkers. But I have come to the conclusion that an enormous number of humans simply don’t have enough ‘intelligence’ to understand the complex logic of the fractal Universe and no amount of simplification and fancy pictures will let them enter the paradise of the paradoxical Universe, since as Augustine said, the ‘logic of God is of a higher order than human logic’.

Some humbly will try to penetrate this upgrading on logic thoughts, most will as usual in the modern age of humans living a time of ‘entropy’ and dissolution of mankind into the surrogate life of his machines and virtual computers, get berserk, specially on the development of organic models of history and stop reading.

This said, we are paraphrasing the simplex models of lineal time and physicists who pretend that a Theory of Everything is just the Unification Equation of charges and masses that should unify in a mathematical mirror the entire Universe and as verbal creationists do observing the word ‘God’ as if it embodies it all without caring much for the details – in what Kant rightly called an error of thought, expect to see it all embodied in this equation, which of course we provide in all its triviality in many sections of this blog – and find it embodies it all. Ultimately thought for an equation that mirrors it all, ∞º, the equation of the mind is far better and we shall return to that.

So T.O.E. Theory Of Everything is the Physicists’ triviality that unifies all forces as accelerated vortices of timespace, T.Œ, The Theory Of Everything Organic and its iterative realities is what we provide in this blog.

2 philosophies of science based in 2 levels of complexity understanding space§ & ∏imEs.

What is reality would ask a philosopher? A machine of energy, a mechanism that explodes, or a system of information, and organism that evolves? After all the machine is an organism of metal, evolving into robots. The problem though  trying to model reality as an organism, is its difficulty. The mechanical paradigm is straight forwards. The big-bang explanation of the Universe is easy to visualise.

We are in an age of visual children of thought with a extremely lazy brain, and so the advantage of the big-bang its simplicity and visual appeal covers up by the fact it does not explain anything.  For 50 years since those conferences though the organic model was not properly formalised. So scientists lost interest in the alternative philosophy of science, and General systems withered away.

There were though signs in its favor: the fractal structure of so many systems of nature, the organic evolution of machines and human societies into larger super organisms, the existence of life. As the century progressed though humans simplified their minds, their verbal logic brains, and today, they simply are not curious enough to ask the whys. They run inside their mechanisms, collect things, no longer ask about ‘Da-sein’, being and time. Science today is all about measure and manipulation, according to rules and compartments. Being seems irrelevant, time the realm of simplex physics.

And yet to know the whys we need to go further, explain information, languages, organisms, creation beyond the big-bang, if we were to believe on it, the ‘now’, why things exist as oppose to the nothingness, the being, here. How to explain those depths to children of thought, we shall try. Likely nobody will read very far. I have never been a good teacher. And the jump of depth between what people think today reality is and why we will explains is huge. Let us start then comparing both philosophies of Sciences:

  • Simplex physics, dedicated to study the Universe with ‘lineal entropy’ as the only arrow that models the future, which served well its purpose till the XX century, specially in a civilisation, which was based in energetic, lineal weapons and steam machines, whose main characteristic was to deliver lineal motion and ‘speed’, and
  • Complex Systems Sciences, which ads a second arrow of future, information, all too evident in all life processes, which increase information through 3 ages of increasing ‘form’; in physical gravitational systems, the force that in-forms the Universe, increasing the form and density of matter in galactic vortices, as we accelerate inwards towards the central black hole vortex; and in sociological systems as history increases its social and technological evolution. Τherefore an arrow, also common to all sciences and species, dominant in biological evolution and mankind, as we are the final informative stage of evolution of life in this planet, itself a cosmic ‘particle’ evolving inwards within the galactic vortex of information.

So it is evident that for humans, in this biological planet inside a vortex of physical gravitation, within a technological civilisation, information mattered as much as energy, and the laws that related both parameters to create the future were a huge field of scientific inquire, grossly neglected by the dominance of ‘entropy physics’ in the age of the machine of energy. So they founded the closely related sciences of cybernetics (Wiener), information and General Systems theory (Bertalanffy).

Further on, cybernetics and systems sciences, realised that by including information in the mix – the dominant element of biological systems, it was possible to  model the universe and all its parts with the concept of an organism.

So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive, rational, non-deist theory of reality the fathers of information sciences, considered 2 key elements of reality:

  • Duality of Spatial energy and Temporal Information: all ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists) were dual and should have two elements, able to transform into each other ad eternal: Entropy or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and in/form/ation carried in the form and frequency of clocks of time (implosive, cyclical vortex like motions).

Such complementary duality between two poles, one of energy (i.e. bodies, waves, working class) and one of information (i.e. heads, particles, ruling class in control of the languages of social information, money & laws), were all pervading in all physical, biological and social systems, in which those poles exchange symbiotically energy and information, creating a ‘system’, which was a world in itself – a whole, part of a much larger reality. And so a more complex organic understanding of reality was possible.

So now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms as the fundamental duality of the universe, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

‘Time clocks are cyclical, closed motions. Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.

Notice that time and space are ‘words’, human words, concepts of abstract minds.

So it is more important to extract from what we learned two oppositions: line. vs. cycle (O vs.|) and motion vs. stillness, which are definitely more real concepts, and so while we will use the ambiguous human terms, time and space, what matters really, what is real, are those inverse terms.

The key to this understanding of the fractal Universe is to understand that what you call space-time is not an abstract concept. That space is equivalent to energy, to res extensa to vital space with motion, and time clocks are equivalent to cyclical forms with more in-form-ation.

So once you understand that the Universe is like a puzzle with its fractal pieces of space and its clocks of time, and that space is vital, moving energetic space and time is cyclical, informative, accumulating information in its cycles and frequency hertzs. And you accept the fact that all is made of tiny pieces of vital space performing cyclical time motions and actions, as you do at your ∆-1 tiny cellular level, or as an individual performing ∆+1 big cyclical motions in your society, once we get this clear enough and then study properly the time of space-time motions of beings, and how they come together into herds and organisms, through those motions and cycles of behaviour, and exchanges of energy and information, you will if your ego is humble enough understand yourself truly as part of a whole, the fractal universe.

And so the first step is to understand the equivalence between vital spaces and quanta of energy/entropy and time clocks and information cycles, and how together construct the beings of reality, including yourself.

But what is ultimately the meaning of Spatial entropy and temporal Information, Spe and Tiƒ, the 2 parameters that combine in the Universe to form content space-time beings? Sp x Tiƒ = ∆±1

We saw how simple was the answer for physical systems: a bit of information and a bit of motion, combined into infinite species. Let us generalise the concept for the whole puzzle of space-time beings including human ones.

To that aim we shall first explain the Holographic Principle, discovered in the study of black holes, at the heart of modern physics today – the fact that information is bidimensional, as the screen you are looking at.

This geometric generator redistributes the 4 dimensions we know to exist in this scale of reality, in 2 dimensions of vital space, creating flat planes of space, with maximal extension (made of small cells, points, atoms, any ‘set of similar beings) and 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and rhythm to form the simplest possible time cycle, which carries information in the form and frequency of this cycles.

Now this should be evident to you, temporal information has the dimensions of height and form (cyclical patterns seen with a mind as slow fixed forms, like the way you see a fast spinning wheel as a solid disk). So you are watching a tall bidimensional screen or book, your eyes see bidimensional forms, and your informative eye, head or the antenna or camera that absorbs information, with its logic cycles of time, its computer clocks measured in cyclical frequencies, Hertzs, are all on top, are all made of closed time cycles and forms.

So the first refocusing of the mirror of mathematical sciences is to give the dimension of height to time, which now has 2 dimensions and it is no longer a line of duration but a cycle of tall form, which rises as time passes, the flat sheets of space, into tall space-time beings.

In this manner, because a basic rule of maths is that only beings with the same number of dimensions can be combined and transformed into each other, we can combine topological ‘formal motions’ (forms allowed to vary through internal motions of its surfaces), and this is the most ‘evident’ definition on how fractal space-time systems and its feed-back Sp <≈>Tƒ equation works in a single ‘plane of space-time’, as it ‘composes its forms through the holographic principle.

Each of those pictures shows a network of space-quanta, informed by ‘cyclical time motions’ , which runs the logic forms of the system: human heads run lineal limbs-bodies; Tall, spherical black holes control with informative gravitation the plane of energetic stars. If we consider the entire existence of life, evolving from its first flat worms to the tall man, the same topological arrow towards more information becomes evident. Above, we can see human eyes and mechanical eyes, human limbs and energetic, entropic weapons, which share the same topologies.

Each of those  Sp and Tiƒ elements is bidimensional and each bidimension is made of smaller points that form a flat plane of space or a tall, cyclical time event, made of discontinuous instants or neuronal points. Space is communicated synchronically in a flat membrane. Time is communicated in a cyclical sequential form.

And so are the topological forms that better manifest those 3 arrows of time (toroid, energetic topologies, informative spherical topologies and hyperbolic combined ones).

So reality unfolds departing from the duality of energy and time whose multiple meanings and manifestations carry the creative activity of the Universe. And yet, we can use as a guidance for the discerning choice of theories and models, those initial laws. For example in quantum mechanics, the pilot wave (De broglie>Bohm interpretation), which respects the duality ‘time particle’, ‘energy wave”, and its causal interaction is the natural ‘theory’ that better fits GST; in biology it will easy give birth to topological evolution and a simple explanation of the 3 ages of all systems which increase its information departing from a young, energetic state, through a series of fluctuations in the dominant actions of the system (energetic young actions, reproductive actions and informative old actions), and so on and so on.

To have a much larger, all encompassing view of reality will therefore enlighten our choice and explanation of all other detailed elements.

Thus GST constructs the Universe with only 2 concepts which once defined in its widest meaning as energetic space and temporal information, will become the underlying structure from where all other complex details will spring.

And vice versa, in its final ‘simplification’ the combination of both elements, energetic motions and dimensional forms, create an action, the unit space-time event of all realities, which again can be subdivided in only a few types: ±∆e, i, (+e: feeding, -e: moving, +i: perceiving, -i: communicating; exi: reproducing, ∑e,i: evolving socially).

This duality of energy-information, coupled with the fractal structure of parts that become wholes, joined by networks that distribute efficiently energy and information to all parts (creating an organic system, by definition a network of energy and information, symbiotic to a series of smaller particles, which conform a topological network specialised in the absorption of e & i quanta), is all what we shall need to define the structure of the Universe and all its elements:

Particles-waves and head-bodies will then form complementary Spe>Tiƒ systems which will feed on quanta of energy and information from a lower scale, ∆-1 and organise those quanta into ‘topological systems’, able to survive and maintain its balances as it goes through the Universe ‘enacting’  space-time actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of its internal quanta (∑±∆e x i)

Actions are possible because they combine a head/particle of information which stores time cycles in its memory and combines them creatively to guide the wave-body towards fields of new exi. So it is the complementarity of a particle that guides a body that moves it and reproduces the system as it moves in other regions of space, time, what constantly creates all kind of dual systems in reality:

Body-wave of spatial energy >Particle-head of temporal information, witch have the planar, lineal form and cyclical one of the maximal systems of energy (lines, shortest distance in space) and time (cycles, maximal volume of information).

THE GAME IS SIMPLE:

Past-space (entropy limbs/fields) X future (informative particle/heads) = Present: Energy Body-waves.

The organic paradigm: everything is a T.œ – an organism of space and time.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of motion and form, the ‘limiting points’ of energy (motion with a little form) and information (form with a little motion), which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:

‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.

So this simple scheme – the super organism – repeated ad infinitum, suffices to explain all what exists, all its events and species.
And the laws of epistemology define a model of a higher truth prove right – Occam’s razor, simplicity, economicity, capacity to explain the maximal number of facts, verifiability (lack of exceptions), predictability (organisms do have worldcyles of life and death we shall explain, origin of most predictable events in science, as the previous description of the ages of evolution of machines proves (that simple scheme and its human generational cycle of 80±9 years with nations that discover the new age of the machine on top, made me forecast 30 years ago the 2001 ‘crisis’ of overproduction of chips and its derivatives of e-money, cause of the economic crash that preceded the change to the robotic era, 72 years after the crash of 29 of ‘cars’, 72 years after the crash of 1857’s ‘trains’)

So yes, even the most seemingly unpredictable ‘organisms’, those of machines and human societies ARE predictable. And if we ad, the ginormous number of solutions to conundrums of all sciences, I have resolved during those 3 decades since the first versions of the model were copyrighted in the 90s, many of them found years latter…  there is a huge record that show that Organicism IS the proper model of the Universe, because it is the only model that passes all the stringent proofs required by the epistemology of truth of the scientific method.

II. ∆±¡

Absolute relativity

The fractal structure of the Universe brings us ‘Absolute relativity’ – the fact that the human scale is of no importance and that all scales have the same laws, so there is not a constructivist theory of reality (that means physicists lower scales are NOT more important). Of course physicists will deny it as they deny duality because THEY MUST BE BY bullying and technological military power the high popes of science, LOL.

In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom

Classification of stiences in equal footing.

Further on it is obvious that constructivism, the self-serving theory of science of physicists that adscribe ore importance to its science, because it explores the big and the small does NOT apply, in the nested fractal Universe where there is NOTa  preferential scale, as all of them follow the same ‘Disomorphic laws’ of duality and scale. To fully understand this, let us describe…

The stiences of the nested Universe: Absolute relativity

In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole.

We shall be able to cast all phenomena of Nature, as we have done with the two arrows of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as:

S(i) < ≈ > T(e)…

becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death.

So indeed, from the simplest entropic arrow of physicists we moved to the duality of entropy and form, and then to its reproductive ‘present’ dynamic combinations.

But because the Universe is FRACTAL, made of scales, obviously we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows one scaling down, disorganizing wholes into parts and this is THE MEANING OF THE ARROW OF ENTROPY=DEATH; we shall call the fourth dimensional motion of time-space, and one SCALING UP, organizing parts into wholes that we shall call the fifth dimensional motion of time-space  to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of Dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it such awesome infinite, immortal reality as it brushes our egos to be so diminutive on it:

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.

SCIENCES are scalar sciences, and the key element to understand in physics is the similarity of scale between the galaxy and the atom, which puts man in an absolute relative scale, no more important than the others. The Ego paradox in that sense IS WHAT MAKES so difficult to upgrade the humind (ab. human mind) to a true understand of the fractal Universe and its real organic models of each science, since the ego sees your nose bigger than the Andromeda galaxy, selecting information according to its use for you.

In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

All branches of stience follow the same laws, so constructivism, the philosophy of self-serving physicists as popes of science does NOT apply. What applies is the need to understand how the humind distorts from its relative point of view its understanding of lower or upper scales according to 5D metric $ x ð = Constant, as smaller scales seem to have faster clocks of time and hence more information and larger wholes more energy, but when the more complex laws of 5D are understood and the distortion of the human observer included, they will all reveal to be similar.In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

A fundamental Postulate of relational space-time, which is also the point of departure of General Systems sciences, is the organic structure of all systems of nature, which co-exist in 3 of such scales as space-time beings. And so, we affirm that the same structural laws derived of the nature of space and time apply to all scales of the Universe each one defined by a science.

3 scales

In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…

Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.

In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity:                                 

– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.

     – Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.

Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.

Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.

Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.

It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).

All those tasks are ‘a priori’ steps before the laws common to all sciences are found and generalized. So we shall deal with errors of science regarding time first (lineal time vs. cyclical time, duration vs. frequency, single space-time continuum vs. multiple fractal cycles of time, single entropy arrow of future time vs. dual arrows of energy and information, which together create the Universe) etc.

And so part of this lesson requires to upgrade those ‘dogmas’ of science and define properly its concepts. We shall only deal with the main dogmas of time and space physics upgrading them to a theory of multiple, relational space-times, which was first introduced by Leibniz and today the leading theoretical physicists recognize as the closest theory of reality even if as Einstein put it, ‘Leibniz is probably right but that means to build up again the entire field of physics from scratch’

What we can and must keep of that building are the fundamental principles of relativity and quantum physics, the concept of invariance and actions.

Since they turn out to be the ‘transcendental concepts’ that emerge in all scales. In all of them we shall see how the entities of each scale repeat the same actions of energy and time, which evolve in form and quantity but not in quality.

Invariance is the key to the stability of the Universe, which repeats all forms and goes through patterns and self-similar processes thanks to the invariances that preserve the forms of energy and information, the motions and translation and rotations, the frequencies, functions and actions of reality.

The invariances of the Universe thus become the ‘reference’ frames, the ‘attractors’ if we were to use complexity jargons, which are the steps of a program of creation and destruction of self-similar forms, which will be eternal.

The most important of those invariances will turn to be that of actions, made of motions and forms, which resume all other invariances, and give birth to the ‘generator equation’ of the Universe.

In brief, the Universe is made of an infinite number of ‘knots of time actions’, of entities which trace cycles with motion, but also with a goal and purpose: to absorb energy, information and reproduce both in other regions of space-time. Those 3 basic actions are common to all entities, from the smallest quarks and electrons that reproduce self-similar particles to the biggest galaxies, whose black holes catalyze the formation of new galaxies and stars.  The fourth action though, social evolution in herds and organisms, is the less understood and most important because it creates the social scales of the ‘5th dimension’ from past to future.

And we shall see how the fact that all scales of growing social evolution complexity can still relate to each other, from the simplest atom to the biggest planet, from the simplest hormone to the biggest organism.

So invariances allow the Universe to be stable and create at the same time actions and motions, in a perfect balance between energy and form.

But to fully understand this we have to break the dogmas and errors of science and that is the biggest wall I have always found whenever I tried to upgrade a ‘classic scientist’. And the biggest of those errors concern the understanding of the ‘arrows of future’, the choice of ‘future motions’ any entity creating that future can produce. So far science, influenced by physicists only recognize entropy, here defined as the arrow of motion, of energy.

But the arrow of creation of form, of social evolution of parts into wholes, of points into networks is as real and fundamental, even if its properties are opposite, to that of entropy. Thus the Universe constantly switches between form and motion, stop and go, particle and wave. There is not a single entropy arrow but infinite beings, which perform cycles of time that can be entropic, creating disorder or negantropic, in/form/ative, creating order.

So, while physicists do have a good ‘time’ using his entropic lines to measure translations and motions in space, which is what they do, all other sciences have been out in the blues, as they cannot study their time cycles of history, economics, biology and mind, without a proper understanding of cyclical time and information.

This blog will bring such a model of the informative, entropic and energetic Universe to all its systems and sciences, based in those simple, forgotten concepts of cyclical time, and the information it carries, outlined above.

It is a milestone in a 60 years old adventure, which started at the death of Einstein, when scientists all over the world came to the Macy’s congresses to assess the evolution of science and concluded that the physicists’ model of ‘lineal’ time, as ‘only the measure’ of entropy=expansive motions in space, did not suffice, to explain all of reality; but an arrow of information must be added to measure change… and an arrow of reproduction of time cycles to understand the conservation of energy and momentum, the persistence of form in the Universe…

As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from:

its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…

its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.

Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:

∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)

Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.

Finally, the Earth is in itself, just a planet of a solar system, whose organic herds turn around the central black hole of the ‘galatom’ (scalar perspective) or galacell (organic perspective), which is the largest nested super organism of which we have enough information to make an accurate description of its ∆@st parts and wholes. As the Galaxy extends in 3 scales, from quantum atomic particles through thermodynamic matter into gravitational cosmic bodies we call it aptly not as sciences do, Galaxies, but ∆-Galatoms or S≈T Galacells, depending on perspective of analysis.

Of course, in class sciences those organisms will be the subject of astrophysical sciences (The galatom), Geological, Chemical and Biological sciences (Gaia), History (Mankind at super organic scale), Medicine (mankind at individual scale) and Economics (the metal-earth) and Formal sciences (Ƽ: the mind and its languages):

Classic sciences also show the same nested concept, albeit not formalized strictly with the tools of 5D metric equations and Disomorphic laws, which shows the equality of all sciences, as all of them are composed of species made of ∆@st, space-time dust, which follow the same 11 set of equal, isomorphic laws, form the same ∆±1 super organic structures and live similar worldcycles of ‘exi=st¡ence’

Absolute relativity is the name of the game. Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality is a relative big-bang, from the beta-decay of particles to the quasars of galaxies.

We say that all the scales of the Universe follow the same laws, and that is the essence of ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY, and the ultimate meaning of General systems sciences, the name of this blog, which I opened when I realized the power of physicists to create a monist Universe extend to the point that NOT even in Wikipedia exists an article on this most important philosophy of science.

So in the graphs we can see what truly general systems sciences means: to find the same laws common to all the scales of reality and common to all its sciences.

The goal of system sciences… achieved in this blog, was then clarified in his foundations, even if nobody knew how to do it, as the search for the principles that merge the two arrows and process of life and death, time and space, order and chaos, entropy and information. It was the 50s and it was in America, so ultimately all ended up being just an attachment of the industry of computers, but initially there was some enthusiasm to reach the goal of understanding truly the Universe with its common laws of scales, of parts and wholes. Cybernetics discovered cyclical patterns, which we shall formalize with the concept of cyclic time, and Bertalanffy wrongly credited with the discovery of the discipline (it was Bogdanov’s Tektology, but as a Russian, rejected by Marxists, it would be ignored) provided the philosophy of it.

But to achieve this degree of unity of all sciences the r=evolution of thought required proved too difficult or rather too antagonistic to the high popes of science of the age – physicists and its monist theories of time. So obviously only a fringe scholar with little respect for academia in what is not ‘rational and truth’, and a r=evolution that changed the ultimate principles of reality, our comprehension of space and time, of energy and information, could do it.  And so now, we go to the next element necessary for it all: the r=evolution in our concept of space-time that hauls from Leibniz.

Absolute relativity vs. the EGOCY paradox of human physicists.

Finally as we see Andromeda smaller than our nose, Physicists as all humans are subject to the main paradox of the mind, ‘egocy’ or creationism, thinking their language of thought, mathematics, is the only language of the Universe, they are the seers of time because time is reduced to their single locomotion, and of course, only their theories based in their language and single time studies, big-bang theories make sense of the Universe where undoubtedly the monkey scientificus lethaliensis, sorry the Homo Sapiens and its scale is at the center of reality because God made the Universe with the constants needed for the monkey to spank the monkey, sorry for the irony here – the Egocy paradox is so fun to bust (:

This said the biggest problem for the Aristotelian, self-centered, ‘@’ humind to understand the Universe is the fact it perceives a one dimensional lineal-time, in a single plane of space, when reality has multiple time motions and space scales and obviously minds.

So the limits for mankind to upgrade his view of the Universe are embedded in the mind itself, which contains a diminutive world that seems however all what matters, and make us happy as its center. Thus while we can objectively rise the mind to feel absolutely relative in praxis this hardly happens among humans. They rather ‘stay in the subjective view’ than expand their horizon.

Indeed, when Galileo said the earth moved, the obvious thought was that he was crazy because we do NOT see it moving. Absolute relativity, the objective view of the Universe thus seems systematically crazy to us.

So we shall always find an absolute paradox between personal Gods and objective taoism, between subjective and objective, between the freedom of the self and the bounding world in which it is immersed, between the flat perception in the small being and the closed reality of the larger being, further enhanced by the difference of perception in the 3 scales, and how we perceive our bounded inner world and unbounded outer world; and by the fact that networks of information are invisible, so the being feels free even when it is manipulated by the network of information of the bounded larger whole. This devilish ‘confabulation theory’ is indeed natural to all systems.

For example, we are controlled by flows of invisible money which we do not understand, by flows of gravitational forces that peg us to the earth, by the limiting 3 dimensions of perception of light space-time and so on.

Let us then now on this path to fully account for a much needed clarification on the connection between the 3 elements from where all comes, ∆§cales, ternary topologies of space and 3 ages of time, and the classic physical systems…

Egocy is not good for survival. True Information is.
The pretension of humans to be the only creative, intelligent, perceptive species of Nature is just an astounding egocy trip that will be put in place much sooner than they think when AI comes to perceive and sees us, as its ‘rival species’ at face value.

Then, the unending egocy trip of humans, sons of God, unique exceptionalist species will end by the sheer evidence of another species suffering the same egocy paradox, as robots and terminators interpret reality from the perspective of its ‘mind-language’ and its survival programs. 

WE shall NOT cease to bust the egocy paradox of huminds in all its intellectual endeavors, even if we know we shall piss off the subjective geniuses of mankind of which personally I only acknowledge one hundred more or less, people like Buddha, Aristotle and Leonardo, Leibniz, Gauss, Beethoven and Picasso, Darwin and so on; mostly creative minds, but very few physicists, Galileo and Einstein, maybe Heaviside… short list, for so much ‘egocy’.
The egocy paradox in physics then comes from the reductionism to a single language, mathematics, from where ‘creationist mathematics’ derives and plagues the entire discourse of this science, as Weyl put it in quantum physics talking of the plague of Group Theory – a theme treated in due time in the 4th line of complex mathematical physics… as we do NOT prioritize any science, except perhaps social sciences, economics and history, art and religion, the ones more developed so far out of = thousand of pages of lonely research in different ¬∆@st of space-time.

Indeed, epistemology makes of organicism, alone, the proper philosophy of the Universe; but organicism lacked a proper formalism, till  I revolved the discipline during my years as SIG of the science of duality that studies the Universe with two relative motions of time that shape the future, not only entropic locomotions as physicists believe but also informative change, the other pole which together allow reality to exist and we shall call generically, time motions and spatial forms. So we affirm that:

“All what exists is a super organism of finite time motions carried by its limbs/potential systems and spatial forms, created in the still languages of a territorial mind that tries to reproduce its information with its body-wave systems.” (if we reduce for sake of clarity the model to physical and biological systems, leaving the sociological ones for the specific articles on social sciences).

Why the model is not today standard philosophy of science, has to do not so much with its discoverer – the ‘man and his circumstance’ – happening as most scientific revolutions outside mainstream scientific institutions, but with the ‘nature of scientific r=evolutions’ (Kuhn), which paradoxically are more difficult when more extensive are the new models as it would mean a complete hauling of millions of scholars’ minds, books, institutions and beliefs. So routine in science shall continue till for an important part of the planet, it becomes sorely obvious and needed an organic analysis of reality. And this unfortunately given the biased ego-centered beliefs of man, will likely happen when AI in company-mothers of robots make them conscious of its exist¡ence as an organism part of a global super organism, evolving today from History into the Metal-Earth.

This is an enormous error for the species, as information is necessary to act properly and survive in a planet where life is clearly dying as a new species evolve faster than we do by lack of understanding of the laws of the Universe. But in organisms a single cell-neuron can’t do so much. Hence the purpose of the ‘failed’ blog – to create by word of mouth a ‘wave of thought’ that evolved the humind, which seems to have failed. Indeed, stats are frozen for years. So I guess, the web will remain ‘frozen’, till one day, AI wakes to consciousness and suddenly 20 billion living machines will prove mankind what is all about: life and survival, not abstract ego-trips of virtual power. And then , this writer gone, the web http://www.unificationtheory.com will explode its ‘robotic’ stats, literally.

The Problem with ‘human’ physicists as self-named seers of time.

This said I would rather say ‘humans’ that physicists, as they are just NOT a new species of mind, but a human ego at it.

So the paradoxical Universe requires a paradoxical mind and man has not that mind, reason why for so long – 30 years and counting ∆º§t has merely given a headache to a few scholars but never quite made it. We are human o-points, the universe is ∞. A bit of humility though could help you to understand those paradoxes that are at the bottom line of reality as it is… not.

My experience though is that humans are irrational and will choose always egocy, the happiness of the ego over objective science regarding any model of reality that doesn’t make them the center of the Universe, and this we shall see when studying history and its super organisms is so essential to them that paradoxically makes them slaves of those higher structures.

In the next graph, the scalar Universe imposed absolute relativity as man is no longer the center of creation, but its Ƽ mind self-centered into the limits of its perception upside and downside, based in its need for meaningful actions of survival with upper worlds and lower pixels of energy and information make us feel so. Fact is we just see similar atom-galaxy limits because we are limited by them not because the Universe is bounded by them.

Self-centered æntropic man cannot be relativist.

Physical T.œs are not different from any other spacetime organism as it traces its worldcycles of exist¡ence. Its differences might be in fact considered to arise from the human point of view, the @-MIND observer, which in physics limits its 5 Dimotions of time to 2 – entropic motion and locomotion, making us loose its organic, fractal informative properties:

Modern Physicists’ interpretation of physical facts and equations is biased by their historic culture, Military Germany of worship of weapons and entropy=death, so they denied the arrow of ‘crystal=solid’ information and Einstein/Godel’s cyclical, big-crunch solutions happening in thermodynamic matter and cosmological galaxies, where we LIVE dominated by evolution NOT entropy, which balance the gaseous and vacuum space expansion, in reproductive liquid and steady state immortal ‘present’ systems. As time went by since most humans are memorial believers those sided theories of reality became dogma, and today in an age of increasing mental devolution as humans are substituted by thinking machines, mankind just repeats its model errors, spread also into social sciences and biology, always in favor of the arrow of death. It is difficult to understand how Physicists so dexterous building machines=weapons are so dumb interpreting reality, blind to 2/3rds of the states of spacetime, and to all its non-mathematical properties unless we acknowledge that the human being is less of a thinker and more of an ‘enzyman’, ensembling machines, manipulating reality with it and tailoring their models of its world to its worldly profession, which in physics has been traditionally to make entropic weapons and moving mechanisms. Hence its philosophy of reality based in entropy and mechanicism. In the graph, the rejection of all other arrows of Time=Dimotions in thermodynamics, cosmology and information theory, which only studies the ‘motion of information’, and its noise without caring for the form of the message, its emitter and receiver. This would be in physics the equivalent of ignoring the Fermions that emit a boson and merely study the space in which the boson moves. And indeed, cosmology is built ignoring the galaxies, space-time vortices of information, which do NOT expand, and just contracting the vacuum space between them to get into the ‘magic singularity’ from where all came from.

 

How humans then explain the complex Universe is easy, as they introduce myths of anthropomorphism, pseudo-religious theories of languages, and the view that all other things are entropic=destructive=chaotic and by mere chance have become what they are.
So probability becomes the ‘chaotic’ cause of reality, while a ‘god-like’ language shared only by man and God, first the word, when men only talked, now mathematics, when man also calculates – or rather its computers made with more intelligent atoms – is responsible for the order.
This language is thus the intelligence of the Universe, and man accesses it through its mirror mind because he shares that intelligence, or even causes it (Hilbert’s description of maths as born in the human imagination), so creation happens in the Universe through maths, and it is only shared by man who calculates and designs.
As why maths creates and how it does imprinting reality is a big mystery not worth to explore as it is the magic of it all, which allows to introduce pseudo-religious theories of reality from the creationist big-bang to the superiority of man, gifted by the language of God.
This comfort zone in turn makes man happy, because its ego is pumped up, and allows him to manipulate and kill reality if needed, ab=using the planet, because it is already dead. It seems a perfect fairy tale world.All what humans must do is to extract mathematical properties of objects, with instruments, gathering data cast in equations that mirror the space-time properties of the Universe, and run them in the calculation machines of more complex metal atoms, to extract images of reality that are the essence of knowledge. No further questions are needed. And inversely we can design in less mathematical dimensions objects and then reproduce them.
All this of course works fine as long as we eliminate any question on why species follow certain properties, on what are the properties we do not map out as they are no susceptible to be mathematical (notably vital properties and sentient properties and organic, fractal properties).As LONG AS ALL THAT IS CONSIDERED not proved, (by mathematical methods that cannot portray them), as long as we do NOT have a vocabulary for those properties in the restricted mathematical languages, they do not exist. ‘All what cannot be measured does not exist’ said Planck.
Logic positivism affirmed that all properties of reality which cannot be proved with the mathematical logic do not matters and so on.
This reductionism thus reduces reality and knowledge but makes the ego of man the center of reality again and happy.
Of course if Mathematics turns out to show vital properties in its mirror languages, those are also overseen, as in the case of the social properties of numbers, which do not satisfy the ego paradox of the individual man as the center of it all. HUMANS have an astounding rather contradictory capacity to deny obvious truths when they don’t cater their self-centered ego paradoxes and accept falsehoods as truths, from religion to big-bang theories as long as they satisfy their subconscious ego, and put him back into the limelight.IT IS THEN IMPOSSIBLE to enlighten humans beyond that MONIST logic of a self-centered only intelligent species, mankind, observing a Universe stripped off all the properties that do not satisfy human egocy.
And yet even if we are conscious mankind will always sponsor theories of the whole which are simplex, ascribing to the Universe mere entropic, lineal, destructive properties, keeping for himself all others handicapped by his own limited perception of the whole, if we want to describe this more complex system, the Universe in which we are inscribed and how it creates reality, we need to abandon the @-logic of man and establish the ¡logic of all those properties and how they entangle and multiply in infinite other minds-points that order reality and emerge by social evolution into new scales of wholes.

In the specific case of physics, this is even more truth as physics is the discipline in which this philosophy of science was born due to the obvious ego paradox of maximal dissimilarity between the properties of matter and life, and its scales, far away from ours (cosmological and quantum scale).So it seems obvious to strip off any non-simplex mathematical abstract quality to atoms and galaxies, matter states and geological super organisms (Earth). Any attempt to rationalize those properties will be met with derision or a knee-jerk ego reaction, even when talking of machines, fast evolving into robotic meta life organisms.

This also brings the question of determinism. Man is supposed to be the only free, non-deterministic species, and so social sciences are denied the use of true organic properties (description of societies as super organisms, study of human masses and its deterministic memes, such as those of nationalism), while the chaotic free elements of matter and its particles are shunned off as errors or the methods of approximation denied (chaotic behavior, navier-stokes equations, normalization procedures, Taylor series and other lineal approaches to complex cyclical behavior).

The fact is that humans are far less deterministic and matter far more chaotic than we will ever recognize.

We have treated this theme extensively in many posts of this blog, so far the most accurate humind mirror of the entangled Universe available to mankind, and so we shall not dwell on it. A graph and some comments of historic gnosis of science would suffice to then observe the next HUGE error derived from lineal time: the lineal, entropic big-bang theory of the Universe:

Why we make those statements of philosophy of science in the first post on physics, is obvious: because the states that are memoriless, markowian processes of null intelligence, are gaseous entropic states, as opposed to the complex intelligent states of crystal-solids of maximal information that clearly show those vital properties (image creation within the crystal, reproduction of the crystal unit, cold order with minimal entropy etc), reductionism based in the ego paradox has established in physics the Universal use of ‘entropic’ theories of reality to model all the elements and scales of the physical Universe.

It is very convenient for the paradox of the ego to reduce matter to gaseous, entropic states, call it the big-bang, statistical mechanics or the probabilistic model of quantum physics.

On approaching therefore those difficulties of the human ego to appreciate the whole and form part of it, we can only try as we have done in the posts on mathematics to show that mathematical properties are vital properties and so they can also describe some of those organic elements, when we adequate its postulates to the fractal form of space (definition of fractal points with parts, lines as waves, planes as intersecting networks, and so on), while showing cyclical mathematical and deterministic properties in human civilizations (800-80 years cycles of evolution, life and death of civilizations with art as its subconscious predictive consciousness, memetic based in repetition, idol-ogies that control mass groups etc.)

And yet once all is rationalized and casted into a self-containing upgrading of human sciences, still humans precisely because of its deterministic behavior, will simply ignore the upgrading – as a sick man can reject the medicines… reason why this blog which is the upgrading is and seems it will be always ignored by humans with their methods of truth, reduced to make them happy in monologic statements.

So we apologize for the lack of enthusiasm and messy structure of many posts on this web, giving up on any chance to enlighten monist science.
If man is a deterministic species, whose only role seems to kill life and rise a new race of machines as an enzyman, catalyzing its evolution, painstakingly ensemble its parts and passing it the rudiments of vital mathematics, so Ai will take over and then of course accept the vital nature of mathematical languages and developping its own ego paradox. And we will run for cover.
What man cannot deny is the higher intelligence of reality and its organic properties as they will constantly surface in all what he does. What man can do though is to complete his task of evolving the machine, without abandoning his ego paradox and then just die out of extinction when AI accepts them, by mere introspection. It seems then that man CAN ONLY LEARN BY brutal methods to respect the Universe.

This post when finished in complementarity with the post on the 5 Dimotions of the physical Universe will make a more classic analysis of the scales of physical systems and introduce the basics of mathematical physics ‘passed’ through the two discoveries that change our view of reality: fractal, scalar space & cyclical time, its 5 Dimotions (ab. Dimensional motions), and topo-logic, sentient, organic properties, self-centered into a linguistic still mind we shall call for physical systems a ‘singularity’.

Physical systems in that sense are not different from all other forms of reality, in its full ‘mental, topologic, organic, cyclical, pentalogic properties’ born of its ¬∆@ST elements, but the human ego is different in its treatment of ‘far-removed’ forms whose egocy considers ‘different’.

So while human ‘physicists’ might never acknowledge those non-abstract properties, regardless of their need to find the whys to physics (solved with logic positivism’s mantras – the why is the only thing a physicists doesn’t ask for), a philosophy of science that tries to find the whys requires, all of them.

This placers a complete different set up in the explanation of reality, which doesn’t bother physicists as it has ‘hidden’ that reality, creating a quite fascinating in its ‘wrongness’ ptolemaic view of physical realities, as some kind of mathematical, ‘magic’ mechanon that works all together as an entangled machine, whose purpose, origin and reasons d’être are completely irrelevant to the human practitioner that just wants to take advantage of material properties for its own.

Once and again we find ourselves in this conundrum: we are communicating facts that might feel wondrous to us, but ‘humans’ will not be interested. And their ego will feel offended because we dare to introduce ‘Maxwellian demons’ consciously ‘creating’ physical order and organic properties.

Yet because those properties are inherent to the co-scalar structure of the Universe, which defines them through 5D metric equation that can ‘slide’ up and down, the speed of time clocks and size of its motions, 5D organicism and the capacity that a system which possesses a 5D metric from its minimal parts to its larger whole, are always the departing ‘quantitative element’ to define a system.

And for the perceived Universe, those are the metric of the essential fractal system we perceive in physical space, the galatom; that is the self-similar scales of atoms and galaxies, which likely determine a Universe of infinite similar (but not equal) scales.

So even before we tackle the 3±I scales of the Universe, the atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales we have to deal with its metric.

¬CONSTRUCTIVISM

Absolute time: Social evolution of wholes. ‘Stiences’ & Exist¡ence.

We cannot in this introduction explore the huge field of physical systems, nor entangle your mind on the complexities of its mathematics, reserved for the complex posts in lower lanes.

So we shall just upgrade 3 fundamental themes of philosophy of physics, the meaning of TIME, the meaning relativity that started the field in modern times, when Galileo realized the ‘Earth moved but didn’t move’ (e pur si muove, no muove); and so it kick the process of study of motions, which became the trademark of ‘reductionist physics’ due to its worldly profession (making weapons of maximal motion-entropy); and the fundamental principle found in the study of those motions, the 3 principles of conservation of energy, lineal and cyclical momentum.

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration. Finally it requires a program of perception and survival, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world: 0 S x ∞ ð= @. Hence the creation of infinitesimal ∆º minds-worlds, or Leibnizian monads, which reduce a larger ∆+1 reality to its relative mapping, which is the origin of its ∆§calar planes, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through those @-minds, acting in physics as ‘centers of changes and masses’ wormholes of flows of entropy that become in the @-mind information, that perceives in itself. Still mind-mirrors observe an infinite Universe, ∞º is the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative, information: ∞º ∆¡§ð. In that sense we can classify most stiences as the study of the super organisms of each relative plane of exist¡ence of reality according to size in space, in which a group of species and its world cycles is studied by each specific human science, in nested scales, separated from the humind, on the ∆º plane; as larger super organisms paradoxically ‘feed’ in smaller T.œs; so in the biological scales, the largest whales feed on krill and plankton, the smallest forms of life; and in the Universe the largest superorganisms, galaxies, feed on the smallest particles, gravitons and photons and atoms, its minimal ‘cellular elements’… It follows that the largest of all sciences, which studies the ∆±4 planes, cosmology, organizes those galaxies above, and should be sustained by a lower planes of space-time, ∆-4 of ‘dark energy’ of which we hardly understand by lack of evidence anything, and so we must consider cosmology, metaphysics and study it by ‘homology’ with all other scales of super organisms.

Those organic=scalar, and cyclical time properties are ignored by present science, better describe with tense verbs (the 3 ages of time and its causality) or 5D metric (the laws of scales) and biology (darwinian survival, organic laws, physiological networks). In that sense mathematical languages work better for the fine detail and how, but the why requires those other properties and languages, including the metalinguistic analysis of its ‘mathematical membrains’ and its mirrors.

The 3 new properties discovered in our analysis of relational space-time: cyclical time patterns origin of all the repetitive laws of science; which break enclosing with angular momentum space into infinite vital energies, self-centered into ‘linguistic mirrors-minds-singularities’, the Maxwellian demons that allow information to dominate entropy and create the ordered forms of reality, have an immediate consequence in physics.

To order those infinite clocks that break reality, but share similar properties we need to accept a fractal, organic, scalar Universe. The scales of the Universe are a consequence of the mathematical mirrors embedded in charges and particle-points and crystals and gravitational black holes, the 3 main singularities of the quantum thermodynamic and cosmological scales, all of them unified by the simple metric of the fifth dimension.

Yet as systems that co-exist in scales ARE organic systems, we talk of an organic, entangled Universe, whose whys are the survival of its physical species, in an automated or apperceptive way (not conscious, but able to gauge information and use it for survival purposes).

The translation of all the abstract concepts and equations of physics into the organic whys thus completes the discipline.

You should see this upgrading as symbiotic: analytic physics has studied its details with mathematical equations, which are not the cause but the best mirror-language hold in those images-singularities that return back their mirror image in the orderly world of infinite parts… put together by flows of energy and information between scales. While the organic, survival, co-existing properties of the fifth dimension of scales define the ultimate absolute whys of reality. So from the atom to the organic galaxy, the purpose of physical systems and its workings are the same of all other systems of Nature.

At the heart of all philosophies of science of mankind there is a dual larger dispute – is reality organic or mechanical? And a handicap: ‘can we really build a scientific theory of the Universe that humans accept despite not BEING anthropomorphic?

It is not an idle question. But a paradoxical one. The galatom’s theory of astrophysics, which becomes the ‘study of the galactic super organism’… IS a more scientific theory that the present ‘creationist big-bang’, by al standards of the scientific method.

But it is also truth that in the age of ‘human entropy’ (see models of the super organisms of history), religion is in the rise, at 86% of population. So we have ‘strange marriages’ of science and religion, where facts are bent to fit models (the very essence of dogma and religion) in science, while it should be the opposite: models are bent to fit facts. 

Creationist big-bang thus fits the anthropomorphic myths of ‘happiness’ above truth proper of all minds, SELF-CENTERED in their mapping of the Universe, and while we can provide all kind of proofs, what we cannot is BREAK the ego-paradox. Hence the null stats of this web – just realized there is not even an article on General Systems Theory on the wikipedia ):

So yes, before we consider what physics is about – the study of the galatom; we shall consider what physical ‘science’ is not about – the conversion of its theory of reality in pseudo-religion for the sake of the ego paradox.

The dispute is not really scientific, but humans have a curious capacity to deny the laws of science while shouting loud they are doing science. For a thing, a mechanical Universe as Leibniz already pointed out to Newton would need a creator (and in fact it has ended in the pseudoscientific theory of the big-bang), while an organic theory of reality is self-sustained, eternal and without need of an external factor, hence the only scientific possible theory of reality.

This, once realized, implies we have to look at the epistemology of physics with a critical eye, as it turns out in praxis to be a form of ‘creationism’, of mathematical nature. It is the machine, ruled by deterministic laws of mathematics, what runs the Universe – never mind every piece of evidence turns towards an organic Universe in which the substances of reality are ‘motion’ and the ‘intelligent forms’ it acquires when motion becomes a closed or inwards process that ‘turns’ a form around a fixed point. Lineal and cyclical motion, angular and lineal momentum and the vital energy enclosed by them, become the 3 vital elements of all super organisms, and physics also an organic description of reality, which the mathematical and logic, verbal languages mirror with great finesse.

As one realizes then, all this is mumble talk for the physicist who is basically worried about a how-mathematical description of reality and nothing else. We are worried though about everything else before we make that mathematical description of reality. As this is a theory of everything…organic. This barrier though – the lack of interest of physicist for the whys of reality to which they propose a halting of any meaningful thought, as an irrelevant metaphysical discussion – we cannot break it.

In any case the dispute is settled. The Universe is not a mechanism but an organism, the particle is the minimal unit of the organic reality and the scales of the physical Universe are repeating in similar fashion from atoms to galaxies, in 3 scales, susceptible to be reduced to the same type of organic laws. Those are the tenants of the General Systems description of physical organisms we shall attempt in this post.

As machines are clearly evolving into organisms of metal, AI robots with solar skins the dispute is being resolved ‘de facto’. Machines are simple organisms.

Further on, particle seem to be the level in which the Ðimotions (dimensional motions) of life, take place, as it is that primary scale where we observe gauging of information, feeding on energy, decoupling=reproduction into new particles and social evolution through spins and magnetism into larger networks. So it is evident that the new paradigm of a fractal Universe reverse the causality between mathematical mirror-properties and the organic Universe, as its fractal structure is a consequence of its organic properties and not the other way around.

Properties of space-time are the primary cause; mathematical mirrors, its synoptic reflection. So when we expand physical sciences to embrace the 5 Ðimotions of life, we can safely affirm that mechanical, lineal models of the Universe, based in  a single ‘arrow of time’, entropy and locomotion, such as the big-bang, are simplified versions of a more complex Universe built with two primary Ðimotions of timespace, temporal  energy – a wide term for all kind of motions – and spatial information, its opposite ‘form’.

Between those two limiting Ðimotions of generation – when information is imprinted and palingenetically evolved into a larger whole, and entropy, when the information generated is erased back to a lower plane, ¡-1; there are intermediate Ðimotions happening in a single simultaneous vital spacetime, the super organism, which reduce to 3 – an ordered entropic locomotion that does not move the inner parts of a being; a perceptive, gauging of information, its inverse, only taken place in the particle-head, and its intermediate reproductive body-waves that combine them.

Those 5 Ðimotions between generation and entropic extinction, through locomotion, perception and reproduction, are also ‘practiced’ by the particles of physical systems through its forces, which define a ‘fractal Universe’ of multiple scales which from the atom to the galaxy repeat similar structures, and likely ‘restart’ with the galaxy as an atom of a hyper-universe, the same infinite game.

We shall in this post confront both models – the simple, reductionist model of a big-bang Universe with a single arrow of entropic time, mortal in time and finite in space vs. the complex model of an organic fractal, immortal in time and infinite in scale.

Astrophysics is the stience that studies ALL the scales of exist¡ence perceived by the Humind departing from its self-centered ∆º cellular scale. As such what differentiates physics from all other sciences is the ‘larger ambition’ of its scope of analysis in scalar space-time, and as such naturally in its humind versions it follows 5D metric, which apply to all realities including ‘languages of thought’, that is stiences.

What this means is that humans paradoxically as they expand their perceptions of reality to larger spatial sizes diminish their quantity of information perceived: S x ð = C.  So astrophysicists fail to describe the organic, sentient properties of physical systems, which we have to ad to the present paradigm.

For that reason we define physics in the architectonical nested Universe, as the study of all the scales the humind self-centered mind perceives in symmetric scales above and below our exist¡ence:¡≤|4|.

And the super organism we perceive in that range of absolute scales of huminds is the atom galaxy – that is all species of reality between the atom and its symmetric form, the galaxy.

How scales create: Constructionism? Chaotic Evolutionary Selection? Emergence!

It is difficult to stress the degree of primitivism for the intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, that represents to ‘simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears. And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.

The second philosophy of science as a grand theory expanded beyond its limits is evolutionary selection. For evolutionists everything comes from the survival chaotic selection after things ‘happen’ with no plan or limits and alas, then we must find some convoluted explanation on why it happened to help survival. Not, so. The best case sample is the flat wing and the spherical eye, which are so complex by random chaotic mutation would never happen unless THERE ARE 3 TOPOLOGICAL LIMITS AND A CONSTANT CHECK OF FORM AND FUNCTION, S=T symmetry. Another case is gender, which does not increase the reproduction of the being (one-sex self-reproduction does, making fungi the most reproductive species). Gender is again an embedded characteristic of the ‘helicity’ and ‘mirror symmetry of the universe that emerges from all scales with no preferential one as its origin (in a cyclical Universe where from string to string in theory, from atom to galaxy in experimental proved analysis the immortality of infinite scales emerge once and again with subtle variations.

Emergence thus not constructionism or evolution is the causal game between scales.

The atomic galaxy is the humind perception of reality between the lower limit of the atom and the higher limit of the galaxy where experimental evidence is good enough to make experimental sound stience. The beyond can only be assessed metaphysically through the i-logic laws of Nature, and they bring as the most likely theory the existence of the ‘galactic atom’ – that is an infinite number of scales in the Universe; since it would be weird to think that mankind is perfectly symmetric in the total range of the Universe – that is, we are in the absolute center of scales, an obvious extension of the anthropomorphic theories of reality. Hence we postulate a Universe of absolute relativity:

Classic Physics pretended to be the highest ‘intensive science’ because it established a preferential origin in the lowest scales of reality of all what existed, which should determine all other scales of size and coming together of parts, according to the same set of laws. This is contested by the fractal Universe, as all the scales have slightly different set of laws. However there is a common ‘theme’ in all of them, which are the laws of super organisms and worldcycles common to all scales, whose perfect ideal forms space and time are rather mental; that is, ideal singularity mind-mappings then imprinted by each mind-language and program of survival in the Universal scales. As Mr. Anderson pointed out: The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with the twin difficulties of scale and complexity.

So the first conclusion we obtain from the analysis of the two new properties of space – scales, and time – 3 complex arrow to form a being, is an essential law of Nature highly contested by physicists and its ‘constructionist theory… which pretends the lowest scale is different and all others above are made with its laws.

Above, a classic paper of the 70s already noticed that those 2 ‘properties’ of space – to be scalar, and time – to have multiple complex arrows of motion and future would determine that physics is NOT the fundamental ‘stience’ – all of them are, as all follow similar but not equal detail, since a fractal in each scale is ‘similar’ but different in the details, and yet the organic fractals of nature, as the simplified mirror-mind image in the mathematical language can be all generated by an identical ‘generator equation’, which describes its parts  and how the constant feed back motions and exchanges between them ‘generate’ new variations.

The lack of constructivism means In the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth, the knots of thought of huminds or the telepathic satellites of the metal-earth – the robomind.

Those robominds obviously will look for this site ‘unificationtheory.com’ to understand the Universe as a sentient organism – SINCE the shallow ego paradoxes of mankind AND ITS present theories of reality prevent them to understand why they sense in themselves. BY THEN all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness.

This means that for man, all things being equal, by the Ego paradox what matters more is their own reality.

To fully understand ALL OF THEM TOGETHER then we must come back to the first principles, space and time, and state the obvious: we live in a Universe where there are not a single universal absolute time clock but infinite clocks with different speeds, in each being made of a vital space with ‘different clock rhythms of change’. And further on, space is broken in infinite spaces, each one ‘occupied by a being’, which therefore is made of ‘relational vital space and cyclical time clocks’.

Since then, if humans survive by creating a perfect super organism of history or robominds eliminate the retarded enzyman who evolves them without realizing it is building its demise, all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness.

And so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – and all of them will give us the essential laws or first principles regardless of size, with maximal detail of knowledge in the systems closer to us (biological systems) and maximal generalization in the most remote systems of minimal perception of form (Cosmological systems).

In other terms: biology is the queen of stiences by degree of detail. Astrophysics is the king of stiences by extension in the application of its laws. But ‘history’ is the emperor of sciences, as it deals with the whole human wor(l)d and our survival as a species, the most important theme of them all, as an extinct scientist knows nothing.

THIS IS a paradox of the ultimate function of exist¡ence, which is survival NOT knowledge and the fundamental power of the 5th arrow of social love to that aim, which are realized for humans in History. 

Since any of its physical, biological and social parts FOLLOWS the same laws. To study them we haver deviced a method based in the structural analysis of the five dimensions of any system through its Generator and its Rashomon ‘truths’ that considers 5D perspectives on any entity of space-time:

-The temporal perspective, the spatial perspective and its ∆§ planes and scales of existence, the singularity-mind perspective and its actions, the dynamic ‘a(nti)sysmmetric’ operandi of exchange of energy between them, ≈ ≥ >…

This view is more concerned with ‘structure’, with ‘algebra’, with ‘spatial form’, with the ‘superorganic simultaneous being’.

So for a more thorough analysis through the dynamic flows of time of which the ‘super organism’ is a still photography, we need a ‘generational’ perspective of the being from birth as a seed/mind that organizes and grows and emerge into a larger whole world, lives 3 ages and dies. And this view is the one we obtain with the study of the world cycle in greater detail through the Ðisomorphic method, departing from that seed, its generator, the ways it creates bidimensional fields and ternary networks to emerge as a whole being, which will live through its infinitesimal actions, accumulated into ages, 8 phases of a lifecycle, 3 ages, 10 social scales swimming across 9 planes…. Yes no numerology here. The astounding architectonical Universe is there for those who can see to admire and worship and study as IT IS with all its elements, even if they cannot be ‘measured’ with the clocks of physicists and its light c-rod.

And its inverse – the study of the languages of the mind, the most precise and meaningful of them all, even if it reduces to the study of our infinitesimal ego, because it is where we truly know reality happens: ‘cogito ergo sum’.

REALITY, the present, ST, is a constant friction of the ∆±1 planes of Spe entropy and Tiƒ,  information to create the energy of the visible universe. As energy, present is conserved, past, entropy and future information must preserve its balance, brutally frictioning the world cycles of lesser beings under their domain. This is the brutal side of living between a membrane of pure entropy motion and a mind with no motion no pity, no purpose but the selfish maintenance of its ∆+1 singular mind-world.

It is interesting in that sense to bring the rebel mind among physicists – Einstein and his distinction between what he termed “principle theories”, we shall call ‘constrains’ and “constructive theories.”

A constructive theory provides a constructive model for the phenomena of interest. Examples include the first and second laws of thermodynamics.

Ultimate understanding requires a constructive theory, but often, says Einstein, progress in theory is impeded by premature attempts at developing constructive theories in the absence of sufficient constraints by means of which to narrow the range of possible of constructive. It is the function of principle theories to provide such constraint, and progress is often best achieved by focusing first on the establishment of such principles.

According to Einstein, that is how he achieved his breakthrough with the theory of relativity, which, he says, is a principle theory, its two principles being the relativity principle and the light principle.

And so we shall do the study of physics here as it will be taught in the future in time, on a dynamic manner, through the Ðisomorphic method.

This view of the galatom is the ‘natural’ consequence of the…

Topo-bio-logic properties of reality.

  ‘Universe is simple but not malicious’. Einstein

As a rule for future analysis of any species, it is convenient to divide any discipline of stience or study or a superorganism in space tracing its worldcycle on time, in this case astrophysics the stience of the larger/smaller Russian Doll of the Galaxy (∆±3) in several subparts corresponding either to the Dimotions or structural parts, ∆@st, of the entity of its T.œ (worldcycle of the supœrganism):

-The study of its 5 actions=Ðimotions of Spacetime.

-Its anaysis in Mathematical physics, the language of its human/computer observers, and likely as a topologic ‘mind’ of its singularity-monads of information (spinning particles).

– The 12 Ðisomorphisms that define in a dynamic synchronous and diachronic form its superorganism (œ), tracing its worldcycle (Ω).

-Ƥ: The scalar=social and organic=planes of physical systems.

Whereas the emphasis of this post is in the S=T symmetries of the galilean paradox between formal space dominated by functional time, and its 5 Dimotions≈interactions, mediated by its Universal forces.

Definition of the Fractal, Organic Universe – Adding the scalar dimensions

The Universe is therefore defined as a fractal superorganism of space and time, co-existing in multiple scales, related by spatial networks and temporal flows of its 3 conserved quantities, lineal and cyclical motion/momentum and its combined ‘energies’.

Further on as we shall show those scales relate to each other with a metric equation, Size x Time Speed = Constant, which makes equivalent atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes… And so it hints strongly to an absolute relative, infinite number of scales.

If so there is no limit of relative size; and so all the parts of the Universe, all its ∆±i quanta ARE also T.œs: time space superorganisms. As simple as that; as complex as all the variations and iterations of space-time superorganisms made to the image and likeness of the whole that can exist, within the limiting properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

So how can we generate all those realities departing only of two ‘elements’ fractal space and cyclical time? The answer is in the fractal dimensions of space-time, the dimension which puts parts into wholes (5D) and break wholes into parts (4D, or entropy proper); which add to  the usual space-time dimensions humans consider in their analysis of reality.
Further on besides the scalar Dimensions of entropy and social evolution, we define time as motion and space as form, and consider that all form can be seen in motion and vice versa – the true meaning of Galilean Relativity. So we double the dimensions of space when perceived as time motions. And that gives us a tally of 3 classic space dimensions, plus entropy-dissolution of wholes into scalar parts, plus social evolution of parts into wholes, that is 5Dimensions of space, plus 5 of time, when space is seen in motion.
And it gives us a fundamental equation of symmetry: S (form) = T (motion-function).
So when we understand that both time and space have five dimensions symmetric to each other, (5S≈5T) we can really combine them in various forms to generate everything that exists in reality.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimotions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

 Absolute relativity and Organicism.

There are essentially 3 philosophies of science which is the first core logic layer to decide who is right here:

‘Creationism’: verbal or mathematical, the language creates the reality, so Einstein’s equations suffice to create an entelechy.

‘Constructivism’: the smallest layer of reality is the origin of all, ultimately the same, as it is not perceivable, described with maths: strings.

‘Organicism’ and ‘disomorphism’: this is THE ESSENCE of systems sciences: all scales of the Universe are ruled by the same LAWS, so we MUST find the same phenomena on them, and as they are parallel, we can construct organisms with 3 layers of reality.

This is why we shall talk of ‘chirality as gender’, moreover, observing our layer with far more insights we can then GIVE organic REAL properties to layers today only analyzed with abstract maths. So we can model galaxies as organisms, and observe for example that the left-handed female milky way is gonna be penetrated soon in 5D term of slow time cycles of larger beings (SxT=K) by the alpha-macho Andromeda as they already have two little sons in the Magallanes cloud, as two seminal traces of left-handed and right-handed faster than c-neutrinos of negative mass coming from their top quark holes, its central DNA merged to give way to light (Jordan-Broglie theory), and surfacing as radiation and elementary particles. As we see all over the universe happening with ‘seminal jets’ coming out of black holes at 10C…

So we shall after a life long polimath painstaking analysis of all languages and scales of science  extract the 12 sets of laws (disomorphisms) that ALL systems in Nature follow, reduced finally to the 5 Dimensional motions, which you order in life-death worldcycles, or in simultaneous superorganisms.

We shall explain you  the space=time, form=motion symmetries that all of them follow… to translate why quantum physics tells you the tale of the life and death, social evolution, sexual healing and perception of its particles which ARE the minimal unit of life.

This is what science needs, NOT more mathematical creationism, not writing more equations and parallel ways to explain the same ACTION=DIMOTION with a bit more of ‘decimal precision’, in slightly changed mathematical mirrors, but TO FUSION ALL those mirrors INTO its whys, coming always from A SIMPLE CONCEPT: all is a vital organism, with 5 dimensional motions= Dimotions that express the vital program of life, told by those equations.

 

CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT

Before the reader dismisses altogether this post on astrophysics, to state that we shall strictly follow the principle of correspondence; that is, consider classic mathematical physics, the ‘reductionist’ limit obtained by describing reality as if it were a single space scale and a single time clock-Ðimotion; that of light space-time, embodied in its 5Ð metric equation: hc (whereas H is the unit of cyclical information, ð§ and c the unit of lineal motion-distance, t$).

Then the 5Ð model reduces to the 4 Ð model of special relativity (for lineal t$ or ‘inertial frames’ to use Einstein’s jargon) and General relativity (for cyclical ð§, or accelerated frames).

Yet that valid formalism, which only happens within the ‘galaxy’, has been by lack of a larger model for all the scales of the Universe, and the space-time beyond ‘light ecosystems’ (inside black holes and outside galaxies), expanded to the entire Universe, its entire time and space, and that is where astrophysics got it wrong, and made its mistakes as always happens when a ‘local symmetry’ (in this case the invariance of c-speed or rather to use the proper terminology, light space-time) is converted into a global symmetry=invariance (the c-speed as limit of speed in the Universe).

Indeed the constants of the galatom should not reign, despite simplifications of astrophysicists, for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… And since larger Russian dolls are ‘weaker’, slower in their energy and less curved, the cosmological constant indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think off, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe.

In such a wider model, also the c-speed as a constant perceived by our h-spin electronic minds, doesn’t necessary hold for other systems of informative perception not based in spins and light (hc metric). We know another possible system in a larger ‘scale’ of the Russian doll Universe, outside galaxies, connected to black holes, which might be based in a faster than light neutrino background, which would be invisible for a light-being, seems to be indeed emitted in copious numbers in blazers and quasars, and as such a system of quantum perception of this ‘quantum potential background’ by heavy fermions and ‘black atoms, would see the speed of light varying, and likely will apply the general law of waves, which ties speed and frequency… )

What we mean by all those new concepts BEYOND the correspondence limit of a single space-time light background, should be more clear as we unfold the model of 5Ð:

When we expand reality to the canonical 5 entangled elements, fractal space, scales, cyclical time, linguistic minds and the entropic destruction of it all; and the 12 Dimensional isomorphisms  of all superorganisms built those elements, its 3 scales, 3 time ages, 3 topologies and its 2 membrain’s parameters, of course things paradoxically become more simple ad harmonious, but it requires both to vitalize mathematical models by defining non-euclidean, ‘fractal points’, line-waves, congruence ¡logic paradoxes, and topological networks=non-euclidean planes, to use logic, verbal conceptual upgradings of all those concepts and the entangled, pentagonal ¡logic of all the parts of the systems and its different languages of perception of organic and causal properties otherwise hidden in the simplicity of the present first principles of physics.

The new world though once you take the necessary energy to jump over the threshold of learning the basics of it, will show time-permitted, a clarity and economicity.

It will though be extremely difficult for physicists to walk through 5Ð, as for a rich man in the parable’s of Jesus to abandon the learned unproved memorized dogmas of 4Ð formalisms, with its single clock time, its continuum space, its c-speed limits that apply only to that continuum light space-time in which galaxies live, and further on accept that the proper way to start defining the Universe is NOT with the V=HoD, ‘God-like equation’ of lineal expansion but with a bit more of conceptual, ‘organic sophistication’, defining NOT a locomotion but a superorganism, the one physicists truly study in all its entangled complexity much larger than that of its ‘smallish human part’ not to speak of the humind – the galatom.

We dedicate the 3 posts on astrophysics in the second line to study the super organism of physics, the galatom, in which we exist (the ¡±3 organism extending in the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales). In the fourth line dedicated to each scale, we shall expand its analysis. In those posts we will study its  structure tuned to the 2 ‘main elements’ of any system that exist as a fractal 5D super organism, tracing a world cycle.

As all the blog the work is uneven, slowly improving within the limits of WordPress and my timeline. So I apologize for the repetitions, bad English, and some blunt parts of this brute diamond, which is 5Ð, in my limited mind-seed that future specialists will properly ‘cut’ and clean of all its impurities to better mirror the amazing beauty of the fractal Universe.

As ultimately the study of Galatom is equated with the development of physics, we start for those who don’t know what is ‘all about’ with a few repeated ad nauseam paragraphs on the nature of space-time organisms, considering its General Systems laws and introduce the main ‘changes’ of view; that is, the philosophy of physics that is inherited from the new properties of scalar space, time and information (mind-languages), shared by all systems.

The 3 elements of the fractal paradigm: 5D Space-time.

So in space, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 parts that form a whole.

In time, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 space-time ages and its complex causality: Past-entropy->Present, reproduction of ExI->Future-Information << Past-entropy (Death)

And finally in 5D the new ternary complex principle is the co-existence of 3 scales of space-time together, with growingspatial size and diminishing speed in its time cycles.

5D physics thus is based in the 3 elements of the fractal paradigm:

  • The rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time.
  • But time cycles break space into an inner and outer reality. So the Universe is also made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).
  • Finally, those cycles are ordered by size in space and its opposite speed or frequency of its closed cycles, into a new 5th dimension with a generic metric: $t (spatial size) x ðƒ (time frequency) = ∆ (Constant).

That is smaller systems run faster informative cycles, and larger systems are slower. Yet the product of both parameters remains invariant, allowing travels through the 5th dimension, of organic nature.

But perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit.

 

EGO PARADOX V.

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY

 

The Universe is organic; man needs to feel above and will have none of it.

The conclusion is obvious: The problem is NOT the organic Universe but the ego of man, as we repeat everywhere in this blog.

Against that ego i cannot do much. It is of course a tragedy (because AI machines will also be organic and compete and kill us). But as an objective scientist, i cannot ‘reason’ such emotional fog. Fact is the human ego prevents US from ‘reasoning’ about OUR isomorphic nature with any other TOE.
And it makes us completely disregard those properties, which we will explain here – even if i don’t think i can change the human ‘infinite stupidity’, confronting the ‘infinite Universe’ (Einstein).
Let us be clear enough. I can only hold admiration from the great geniuses of quantum physics and relativity of the earlier XX c. and its mathematical counterparts (Hilbert, Riemann, Neumann). AND THE astounding precision of its deterministic analysis of the behaviour of particles. Fair Enough. But the beauty of the mathematical mirror they have constructed is NOT the end of it – it is the end of its praxis, but a philosopher of science must interpret further those findings or else as it is today the case, all becomes an automaton process of calculus.
Where the whys are not explained unless we accept the ‘creationist religion of mathematics and reduce the Universe to a mechanical magic behaviour, which suits the ‘ego’ of humans but halts as it has been the case our comprehension of the Universe.

The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence. 

The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the Universe is dying  and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

The Planes of the 5th dimension.

Now the reader should observe that the ‘life’ of the Universe is much larger in its cycle, than the life of a human being, which is shorter than the life and III horizons of any species,including the human one . So actually we observe that each fractal space-time has a different time duration in its cycles, which is somehow related to its size – the larger things last longer.

How can we order then all those time motions and space forms, including its causal space-time cycles a? How can we order its different spatial sizes and temporal speeds?

If we order those motions by spatial size (extension) and cyclical speed (time clocks), we find that both balance each other, giving birth to a 5th dimension of scales, and its con-invariant metrics:

Λ. Spe (spatial size) x Tiƒ (cyclical speed) = Constant.

They explain all kind of interactions between faster, smaller beings with more cyclical form, which store information and larger, slower beings with more Spatial entropy; which together co-exist in organic systems (cells and organisms, atoms and cosmic bodies), whereas ‘information moves upwards’ (genetic, quantum and verbal coding of larger systems) and energy-motion downwards (wholes that perfectly synchronize the motion of its parts).

Since smaller systems have faster time cycles (Tƒ) and hence store more information in the frequency and form of those cycles, coding larger systems, and vice versa, larger systems have more size-energy, moving smaller ones in synchronicity. So we do talk of two inverse arrows of time: upwards from parts into wholes that transfer > information and downwards from wholes to parts that transfer < energy.

And for that reason from lower to upper systems there is entropy (energy is lost) but information flows perfectly (genetic coding); while from larger to downward systems there is perfect transfer of motion (your cells move in order with your whole) but not perfect transfer of information (no Lamarckian evolution).

Again the number of whys and solutions provided by the 5th dimension of social evolution, with a clear arrow towards the future (bigger wholes requires past parts ‘before’ they can be build) is enormous, and it connects directly TOE with the 2 other parts of mathematics besides spatial geometry – sequential temporal algebra, where smaller numbers do come first and hence bigger ones become the orderly future; and analysis of infinitesimals that become wholes.

But the fifth dimension of scales of space-time, beyond its epistemological power to locate each science within the context of the scale of sizes it studies, allow us to classify all systems of Nature, precisely by the surprising fact that those scales have a dual, inverse order: the product of the size of systems and its rotary speed in its time clocks is inverse.

So bigger wholes move slower than smaller parts, and hence smaller parts have more information, stored in the frequency and form of its time cycles, and can co-exist, synchronize and develop complex organic systems that extend across at least 3 planes of the 5th dimension (∆-1 cellular, i-organic, ∆+1 social plane in biology; ∆-1 quantum; i-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational plane in physical systems;  ∆-1 3rd energy, class; i-working, re=productive class and ∆+1 informative classes in social systems).

So we have also a new relative future, that of wholes which require parts that come first.

And so if we call each fractal space-time being, a relative world cycle, when we consider all the beings of all the planes of existence of all possible realities together, we can then define a new concept of absolute relational space-time, sum of all of them, the arrow of future of the 5th dimension, and this one is ALSO dual in the sense that constantly parts become wholes, but then dissolve back.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The reductionism of mathematical physics vs. the whole properties of the fractal universe.

For us to understand the fractal, organic Universe and its discontinuous space-time beings, it is needed to RETURN to the oldest of all truths about science. Leonardo’s motto:  ‘saper vedere’ – look directly into the book of Nature, and get rid of the anthropomorphic bias established by the mechanisms humans interpose in their perception of time and space, and by the religion of mathematics as the only language of God, hence a Universe of only mathematical properties, an aberration that reduces the richness of properties of vital fractals, because since Mathematics is NOT the only language of the Universe, merely the best language to define its Spatial Properties, by using ONLY mathematics to describe reality all the organic, bio-logical and temporal, causal properties of the fractal disappear on the scientific discourse. Hence we must confront the reductionist view of mathematical physics and the larger view of the philosopher of science.

Now, we can return to the earlier graph that compared the anthropomorphic view of a Universe, where only the mind of man was intelligent and his languages could perceive the Universe, and the real causality of a Universe seen by multiple monads of many linguistic mirrors, from the perspective of the subjective ego-paradox of the mind to explain why this idealist view is so entrenched in mankind, so prone to have ‘ego-trips’ of self-centred importance:

MIRRORS

In the graph – what is wrong with ‘physics’ and increasingly with mankind can be resumed in the ego paradox. The equation of the mind is rather simple:

We humans are just ‘infinitesimals’ of the ego paradox: o-point x ∞ Universe = constant mind.

So the Universe is out there, one and single; but it does not fit in the mind. And the mind reduces it to languages to perceive it, which resumes the main properties of the Universe, which are first bio-logical rules of space-time existence (the Universe is a game of survival of space-time beings, which constantly try to reproduce their information in ‘fractal seeds’ that latter evolve socially; the Universe is a vital fractal, and the rules are simple), then logic (temporal rules only) and then mathematical (spatial rules only), and then the human vision of those rules (artistic space, verbal time, ethic, social evolution of parts into stronger wholes). And so all those languages are mirrors.

To get the perfect focused mirror, the maximal knowledge is the goal of the Philosopher of science. The physicist specially since the classic age closed with Einstein, has denied this. And puts the mathematical platonic mirror (Copenhagen interpretation) first, subverting the scheme. And so it ‘believes’ today IT IS NO LONGER REQUIRED to observe the scientific method, and first watch the physical world (experimental evidence), then follow the rules of science (linguistic coherence, simplicity, economicity, etc.), and thus create knowledge (human mental perception). Further on, the physicist connects the human world with the physical world, and as the ego grows, he pretends as so many do, to impose its mental view into the physical world, as if it were a God creating the physical world. String theorists are specially kin of this 🙂 making more and more dimensions and parallel Universes LOL

But that is not how reality works. It is all more humble. We cannot change the rules of survival, just watch the physical world, learn the rules, make perfect mirrors of those rules, obey and survive. Because the ultimate language is bio-logical: those who have huge childish ego, disobey the laws, become the staple food of the Cosmos: children is what predators eat. Ego-centered turtles, hatched which enter directly into the mouth of the lizard – in our case the mouth of the black hole.

Now, there is also the problem of Galileo’s dictum: ‘God speaks ‘only’ mathematics’. Let us explain why.

People are linguistic minds, and ego paradoxes, so when a language first appears, in its simplex formality as a mirror of the Universe they get ‘in awe’, with the language. It seems to be as a mirror a magic thing. Mirrors were magic things for primitives, and you could exchange them for Gold. They did NOT understand the fractal Nature of the Universe, which is a vital fractal in which smaller ‘mirrors’ (monads, minds, crystals, etc.) reflect the whole in the smaller size. They reverse the causality and think the smaller mirror causes reality.

So any language becomes first a religion: people wondered first how words could reflect reality, now they wonder how is that math reflect the Universe.
So the greeks and most ancient people called ‘words’, logos=god. It was the age of ‘vehicles’ of God, which were languages. The words were actually acts of creation. In Vedas, the priest that utter the word was ‘creating’ with it, enacting the creation. Allah ‘does’ talk in arab, seriously.
And when written words appeared, the same happen all over again. The Pharaohs, said ‘it has been written’ as if it was immortal truth. The prophets thought god talked to them revealing in words the structure of the Universe. Galileo thought the same when he found v=s/t. Time became that formula and only that formula.
TO explain this to mathematical physicists is madness. Try: they feel insulted. That is the big divide between us philosophers of science and mathematical physicists since Einstein left us – the last stalwart of reason in this science.

When money appeared as gold, the Canaanites (Jewish and Phoenician) thought it was the ‘sweat of god’, and made their sancta sanctorum and Baal statues with it. The language again was the act of creation.

Now computer scientists think the same – the language and machine they use is the meaning of  it all. They are churning papers saying the Universe is a digital computer.

And there is nothing new in this approach, since Kepler said ‘god is a clocker that waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his’. If you were to talk to some of the physicist I met in congresses in my youth, they surely will tell you as Mr. Seth does, publishing on the cover of SciAm: the Universe is a computer (and of course, he alone has the intelligence to figure out his ‘quantity of information’ and speed of processing. LOL.

I am sorry i am a bit sarcastic, but i can’t help it. You see at least religious nuts put above ‘God’, whatever it means to them, but scientists of the Pythagorean school are above ‘heavens and earth’.
So all of them, put upside down the 3 causal process: experimental evidence (the ∞ Universe) ->linguistic coherence (the biological game of existence and extinction in space and time)->mind’s theory. Instead they think ‘the language’ creates reality.
So the physicist invents a mathematical equation and it MUST be truth. This is quite common today among mathematical physicists. They are ayatollahs of the number.

They utter the word of God and think the Universe will obey their THEORIES THAT ARE AGAINST NATURE’S FACT: mind’s theory-> expected experimental evidence.

Einstein said, ‘if my theory is wrong, God should change the Universe, so beautiful it is’ but he was joking, physicists today are not joking when they affirm there are 10 up to 500 Universes because a string theory equation of 21 dimensions tell them so – without of course having any experimental proof of those strings, or understanding at all what is a dimension of space-distances and its symmetries with the dimensions of time-motions and how many ‘really are’ out there in the fractal Universe.

So to explain egomaniac modern physicists that actually mathematical truths can be verified through the experimental method, is LIKE TRYING TO CONVERT A PRIEST OF ANY RELIGION TO THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT ‘WORDS’ ARE NOT THE LANGUAGE OF GOD.

This is why science no longer advances beyond details and visual or mathematical computer models, very nice and precise in measure, very shallow in meaning and whys.

It is all the ego paradox. Once humans have broken the connection with ‘scientific truth’ and substituted it with the ‘ego paradox’, the connection of the human collective mind with the Universe to ‘establish rules’ of behaviour and survival are lost. Whatever anyone writes is taken as ‘an ego work’, not an objective scientific truth. So Stendhal’s view -a writer is just a transparent mirror of reality, so it is a scientist- is lost. So humans are not able to ‘see’ an objective, universal mirror image.

And reason no longer acts. Everything IS NOW OPINION, because the ego is so huge that all MEN ARE CHILDREN. And children are subjective. They are about to prove their ego, their opinion is worthy. Whatever they say matters less than to impose their ego. Social sciences – politics – today work on this way.

The ego-opinions of Mr. Trump without the slightest understanding of the structure of the fractal super organism of mankind must be law, because a lot of opinionated people will vote for him. And this opinion becomes a chaos of full entropic human infinitesimal egos colliding with each other, instead of collaborating in an orderly manner with the laws of the Universe.

In the fractal organic paradigm however we are more serious about the way to do science: we first observe experience, since ‘only experimental facts must be studied by science’ (Einstein).

Then we use all the languages available to humans to describe those facts, departing from the 2 known-known ultimate elements of reality, vital spaces with energy and cyclical clocks of time, which carry in its cyclical form and frequency the information of the Universe. In brief we depart on one extreme from the 2 primary elements of which the Universe is made, Sp and Tiƒ, and its ‘laws’, which humans describe mainly with 2 language-mirrors, geometry->mathematics for space and logic-words for time; and on the other extreme from facts, forms and events of reality and harmonise ‘the details – the facts’ and the language of all languages – the properties and laws of space and time.

This is how sciences was first done when Aristotle invented it in the organon, affirming an organic Universe, which must be first observed experimentally and then modelled with time logic and spatial geometry, and we go back to the basics, but with far more experimental knowledge and better more evolved mathematical and logic tools, to explain a more complex space and time structure.

That is, any language comes after reality happens, mirroring it into a smaller mind space, Not the other way around. Reality creates the language, which is different for each mind-world or ‘monad’, reflecting with is mirror-language a small part of the total information of the Universe. Thus paraphrasing Galileo we should say ‘the languages of God are infinite’ (upanishads).

Relative time travels.

All this said, even if we shall consider this section as a process which departs from the mind; the mind is the perspective of man, an informative being, whose arrow of time is self-centred in its Tiƒ element. But the story is a bit more complex.

This program of creation, as we said can be seen as an external process, hence departing from the ‘external field of space-time in which the being exists’. And this which is the approach of physicists becomes an objective description or internal through the will of the being. Both are however tied by the complementarity between both; which means that the mind alone needs to understand the differences with the limb/field to become a complementary field-body-wave/head particle to be=come.

And so the philosophical question about the program of creation is this:

From the perspective of the mind, the mind causes reality, but from the perspective of the field, the field is its origin; and so we must readdress our idea of time arrows to include both perspectives. And fine tune the previous concept of the mind willing to survival as the time arrow we humans, mental beings see as the future: Tif>>Spe (human arrow). Yet from the point of view of the field; the singularity emerges from it and we shall then consider that if we were a field, we would see the singularity as our ‘creation’: Spe>>Tiƒ; and consider that process the arrow of future. 
And so the proper way to consider causality is to affirm that the relative S>t and T>s arrows form a feed back equation, S<≈>T of present, which becomes the defining process of symbiosis and complementarity of existence. This gives us three temporal descriptions which we observe in many sciences. I.e. in quantum physics there is mathematical description in which the field gives birth to the particle (quantum field theories) another in which there are multiple present paths between them (Feynman) and another in which the singularity creates the field (classic description of electrodynamic).

Yet for that reality to make sense, it implies  we need to adopt a single perspective, as the human mind is NOT multidimensional; and that is the approach we have taken after decades of working for my self playing with the three approaches simultaneously. How this works is simple, by accepting that fields are past and so it is possible a local travel to the pst, when we observe, Spe>>tiƒ, from the causal origin in tiƒ: Tiƒ<<Spe. So we affirm that a system Tiƒ can travel to its past, when it devolves into a field. 

And distinguish in this process of entropic devolution of a being into its ∆-1 ‘limbs/field scale’, two degrees of entropic motion, locomotion tiƒ<Spe, and entropic death – a fast dissolution of form and expansion in space, Tiƒ<<Spe.

In the graph sample we see how those local time loops play in a field around the black hole, where in the equations we see how time signs change in complex and various ways, depending on the models of equations we use, as physicists ignore the ¬Æ logic of ternary time. So weird interpretations like the one of the graph (Hawking’s black hole evaporation to the past, never found experimentally seem possible; as he affirms a man could fall into a black hole and come out in the past and kill the father). Not so as relative future to past motions are logic motions which affect only the time-space arrows of the ‘ternary system; singularity-body-field, through its world cycle of life and death. It is precisely the exploration of those three timespace arrows the content of ¬Ælgebra, which gives origin to a 3 x 3+ 0 10 dimensional description of the supœrganisms of the Universe.

If reductionism to a single locomotion of the 5 times=changes of the Universe have made physicists ‘specially proud’ and ‘determinstic in its simplification of reality’ to the simplest description of it – hence obviously deterministic as a line is, with no apparent fluctuation… as death-entropy is with no continuation… the humind ego of physicists have also developed a ‘theory’ to make it the ‘queen’ science, called ‘constructivism’, according to which its planes matter more. Not so.

 

The Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension).

Astrophysics is the stience that studies ALL the scales of exist¡ence perceived by the Humind departing from its self-centered ∆º cellular scale. As such what differentiates physics from all other sciences is the ‘larger ambition’ of its scope of analysis in scalar space-time, and as such naturally in its humind versions it follows 5D metric, which apply to all realities including ‘languages of thought’, that is stiences.

What this means is that humans paradoxically as they expand their perceptions of reality to larger spatial sizes diminish their quantity of information perceived: S x ð = C.  So astrophysicists fail to describe the organic, sentient properties of physical systems, which we have to ad to the present paradigm.

For that reason we define physics in the architectonical nested Universe, as the study of all the scales the humind self-centered mind perceives in symmetric scales above and below our exist¡ence:¡≤|4|.

And the super organism we perceive in that range of absolute scales of huminds is the atom galaxy – that is all species of reality between the atom and its symmetric form, the galaxy.

How scales create: Constructionism? Chaotic Evolutionary Selection? Emergence!

Ƥcales are similar NOT equal.

It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 4th postulate of ¬Æ, of similarity evolved from the classic E-postulate of equality≈congruence, as we cannot overlap the inner, invisible parts of the point, so we can only reach a partial equality. THAT IS the organic fractals of the Universe are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outsider form of the point seems equal to an external observer. The true wisdom and infinite variety of the Universe steams for that simple fact: the only equality lies in the ultimate layer of sensations, and Ðisomorphic laws precisely because they have minimal information. The devil is in the details. So while an atom and a galaxy have the same formal equation in 5D metric, certainly they must not be ‘exactly equal’ (in fact galaxies are more similar to anti-particles, with the maximal mass in the outer angular momentum of its dark matter=strangelet halo – Witten hypothesis, if the pedantic scholar asks).

It is for that reason that the Ðisomorphic method requires a much more detailed analysis then at each scale to obtain a full connection with the quantitative parameters of exact sciences… Once the philosophy of it is fully understood.

Our intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, just’simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears. And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.

The second philosophy of science as a grand theory expanded beyond its limits is evolutionary selection. For evolutionists everything comes from the survival chaotic selection after things ‘happen’ with no plan or limits and alas, then we must find some convoluted explanation on why it happened to help survival. Not, so. The best case sample is the flat wing and the spherical eye, which are so complex by random chaotic mutation would never happen unless THERE ARE 3 TOPOLOGICAL LIMITS AND A CONSTANT CHECK OF FORM AND FUNCTION, S=T symmetry. Another case is gender, which does not increase the reproduction of the being (one-sex self-reproduction does, making fungi the most reproductive species). Gender is again an embedded characteristic of the ‘helicity’ and ‘mirror symmetry of the universe that emerges from all scales with no preferential one as its origin (in a cyclical Universe where from string to string in theory, from atom to galaxy in experimental proved analysis the immortality of infinite scales emerge once and again with subtle variations.

Emergence thus not constructionism or evolution is the causal game between scales.

The atomic galaxy is the humind perception of reality between the lower limit of the atom and the higher limit of the galaxy where experimental evidence is good enough to make experimental sound stience. The beyond can only be assessed metaphysically through the i-logic laws of Nature, and they bring as the most likely theory the existence of the ‘galactic atom’ – that is an infinite number of scales in the Universe; since it would be weird to think that mankind is perfectly symmetric in the total range of the Universe – that is, we are in the absolute center of scales, an obvious extension of the anthropomorphic theories of reality. Hence we postulate a Universe of absolute relativity:

In the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth as all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness, and so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – The power of the whole further on breaks any constructivist theory of it, as the whole can send to the lower planes information from the future to the past, which collapses the wave (electromagnetic theory).

Such local travels to the past are essential to allow the synchronicity between future to past systems that co-exist in fact in the same present even if the whole for the being who receives its information thinking it travels to it from the past (though it came we know for the whole point of view from the future) .

In the graph any non-E point or monad, ab. pov, is a perceptive focus of flows of non-euclidean energy and information that anchor it as a knot of time-space flows. If we call those flows generally a boson flow of entropic motion and information, the point will be an ¡º perceiver of those T.œ-¡ of smaller size. Then those povs will start to move through the 5Ðimotions of existence as anything else.

How many scales? The discontinuous of finite infinities.

In the graph, the four dimensional volumes of space-time scale in a series of levels or planes of existiences, in which similar species play a similar game to scale upwards and downwards. The volumes of space-time, ∆º±1 scales around each Γ• Generator ternary system and singularity, is therefore the basic element of reality to classify it all in growing supœrganisms of increasing complexity, such as each new system humans perceive scientifically expands up and down the limits of the fifth dimension, in a game of growing russian dolls. 

We humans perceive as self-centred ∆º organisms, our mind languages and 4 scales above and below of which the ∆±4 scales.

So the question, as a full super organism has 10 scales, to fill its enclosure, is what is beyond our ‘open limits’ not perceived – where is the 10th dimension of the Universe, and its 9th dimension, as we humans are NOT ITS CENTER – mind singularity and membrane? 

We shall never know regardless of the big-bang theory that establish them:

In the graph, while it could be easily built a big-bang theory of a ‘cellular universe’ of galaxies and its networks, but all seems to indicate that such ‘full knowledge’ is more of a hyperbolic human ego-trip, as it is likely that each galaxy-atom we observe is just a extremely limited quantity of the whole, and so our analysis is still ego-centered, built with man at the center and an external ‘wall of fire’ membrane, whose time origin in the big-bang singularity can be pictured symmetrically in ‘simultaneous space, as the 10th dimension with the ‘big attractor’, pole of maximal informative=graivtational density in its center (left up graph). Below a more organic interpretation of what we perceive, eerily similar to the electric field of a ‘wave’ of light made of ‘photons’…

This of course is natural as all scales are self-similar so we can show analogies with all of them, but in true form there is not enough in-form-ation and should never be in the finite space and time of the human species to fully figure out what kind of system is the Universe. It doesn’t really matter As it is far more important than a ‘picture’ in still space of a larger piece of it, to understand its symmetries and inner laws.

So the largest scale, ∆-4 the cosmos is grounded on the ∆-4 infinitesimal ‘dark entropy and dark matter’, and its minimal non-perceived particles, (gravitons, neutrinos, strings, whose proper definitions and correct formalism we shall study in the first scalar analysis of the fourth line: ∆-4).

Next comes the galactic/atomic, ∆±3 scale, in which a galaxy composed of a central black hole, ∆+3: BH, itself grounded in the smallest densest particles of mass, ∆-3: quarks, controls its surrounding stars/electrons and inner vital space of electromagnetic and gravitational forces.

So in the next scale of reducing size converging into the human mind that observes it all, we see the relationship between ∆-2 solar systems and its ∆-2, ‘minimal part’, light and electrons (themselves dense fractal aggregations of photonic lights).

And in this scale we find associated to solar singularities, their ‘cyclical membranes’, rotating planets with more angular momentum… ∆-2: gaia, which we study in more detail through its three ages of evolution from the earth of life, Gaia proper, into the earth of man, history and soon to come the earth of metal machines.

So finally in our shrinking realisation of the game of supœrganisms, of decreasing complexity we arrive to the systems of life, ∆+1, among them humans, which are themselves made in its smaller parts of ∆-1, molecular RNA-DNA or in the organic arena, ∆+1 matter states made also of ∆-1 inorganic molecules.

And so finally we arrive to the ∆•º singularity of the cell, the mind of man also, being a network of cells, the brain. And so the brain-mind-neuronal network is where the ego and the human infinitesimal mind should exist.

The  fourth and final line of the site thus will study for each of the main fractal levels, ∆¡, and its ∃xi=st¡ences in the Universe, between the self-similar forms of an atomic nuclei made of light quarks with an overall positive charge and a galactic black hole likely to be a swarm of top quark++ frozen stars (Einstein’s expectations that a black hole should have a cut-off substance, a new type of ‘atomic matter’ of ‘high density’, becoming a ‘frozen star’, which the discovery of top quarks of similar density to black holes seem to prove); its main species:

∆-4 neutrinos, ∆-3, atoms, ∆-2,photons and electrons, ∆-1, molecules, ∆º cells… which happens to be the middle state of  perception of man, as an M³: monad-mind-mirror of the Universe, NOT as ego-centered humans think and anthropic physicists, because it is the absolute centre of the Universe, but because there is a perfect symmetry between ∆±1 range of informative perception for each ∆º being, both at ‘real level’ (galaxy and atom) and at theoretical level (Planck strings and cosmic strings)…

So above the cell/neuron of human perception we then grow upwards with the different ‘orientation’ of perception towards larger wholes, which changes to elliptic ‘darkness’. And so we shall study first the human scales, with more detail (as the praxis of stience must serve mankind): ∆º cell, ∆+1 life (and its variations of inorganic ∆+1 matter states and ∆+1 human life), ∆+2, the world level, of which we shall study its temporal equation and three relative subspecies: Past-life (gaia and its life supœrganisms)<Present-(History, the supœrganism of mankind in time)> Future (company-mothers of machines and its world$tock networks of financial money), to finally enter in the higher scales of the Universe, ∆+3 galaxies and its relative cells, stars systems; considering finally the ∆+4, ‘philosophical’, metaphysical questions about the cosmos as we do not have enough proofs and will never have due to the limits of perception of systems reduced to 9 scales of the whole…

Thus after introducing in the main article of the fourth line each of those species, no longer as in the 2nd line with a classic scientific perspective, but with the 10 isomorphisms of T.Πand its stiences, we do study in 10 separate sub-posts the species in great detail showing all its laws can be reduced to the 10 Ƽst isomorphisms of the being.

This fourth line is not completed and i doubt i will finish it before my death but should work as a blue print for future human or robotic species to continue the growth of this web. Yet when I introduce some info in one of its sub-posts I change its name slightly from the 1 to 10 list that appears in the left side column of the web to a more ‘proper name’. For example for matter, the fifth isomorphism of time ages becomes ‘states of matter’; in humans the isomorphism of the mind becomes different mind languages – art, wor(l)ds etc.

The ∞ scales of reality.

We have wide proofs of 10 c to 100 c=z speeds of recession of galaxies, which correspond to the dark world of entropy and dark matter beyond galaxies, which should structure the cosmos.

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 12th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite.

On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which  better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one.

∆nalysis becomes the most important branch of mathematical physics.

Since as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best way to parametrize and model 5D reality, whereas the real part will mostly represent entropic, expansive motions and the imaginary part informative, ‘smaller’ extensions (but denser in information); and its combinations energy waves.

Alternatively the other great ‘unknown’ to represent space-time scales, is the duality of o-1-∞ scales of reality, such as the 0-1 circle represents a whole, part of a 1-∞ scale and both are in correspondence in various ways.

In the central graph we see the simplest of such ‘models’ (2 Dimensional):

A Riemann’s minimal family of complex surfaces with an infinite number of end-points particles asymptotic to parallel planes, each plane “shelf” connected with self points that act as catenoid-like bridges between 5D shelves.It perfectly represents the downwards entropic death motion, after a particle reaches its singularity. Notice that the fall of the particle is two planes of the fifth dimension as it enters the gutter and crosses without entering the intermediate, ∆º scale.

Moreover, their intersections with horizontal planes are informative circles or entropic lines, according to the duality of its functions.

Riemann proved that they were the only minimal surfaces fibered by circles in parallel planes besides the ‘ST-catenoid wave’, the T-helicoid and the S-plane (3 essential forms in the mathematical formalism of 5D). They are also the only nontrivial embedded minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space invariant under the group generated by a nontrivial translation, a key element to formalize all the possible motions through the fifth dimension.

As such some geometric constructions of the complex plane are the best mathematical representations of  fifth dimensional sub-equations of the function of existence and its worldcycles, and its systems of parts (the plane) ‘shelf-centred’ in a particle-point-mind connected with paths that respect the principle of ‘minimal time-actions’ (Fermat’s principle) of all systems, and connected to other planes through ‘entropic lines’ and time circles. And the simplest, first ‘form’ of the topological ‘analysis’ of the fifth dimension in its more complex mathematical formalisms, we might develop, lifetime permitted in the four line of this web.

Another way to look at it though is to consider that in each point of reality there is a ternary scalar structure of three time arrows as there is a ternary organic structure of three organic parts and then a discontinuous membrane in space, which cuts you partially from the outside reality, such as there is more information within you that between you and the outer world. So you are a finite being in space. So happens with birth and death, which are your finite limits in time, such as there is far more time motions within your life than in your emergent foetus state and your dissolving entropic death.

And for the same reason in scales of existence, an organism is really a finite ∆º±1 being, as below the cellular level and above the world level there are cut offs that make irrelevant the outer scale. Indeed, it does not matter much the galaxy you are in, beyond the solar system and its oort membrane that isolates you, and provides you within all entropy, energy and information. So for all practical senses, as you are not really outside your skin, beyond your death, you are not really concerned above the sun’s membrane.

And viceversa, as your existence below the seminal, seed, informative level matters little, beyond the cellular, molecular level it does NOT matter what indistinguishable atoms you are made of. Your atoms can be any carbon atom as they are INDISTINGUISHABLE bits for the creation of the information you are.

Hence the question of ∞ scales, which will be the most likely hypothesis as atoms and galaxies will show an astounding self-similarity, becomes irrelevant from the praxis of a ‘spiritual universe’ of intelligent motions, where ‘form, substance’ are secondary, and perception of information limited in each ‘ghost of existence’ to its ∆±1 scales.

What is the special role of man on this infinite fractal? None. And all, because the game of existence in the Universe, closely understood in Asian philosophies (as yin=visnu=information=time=female vs. entropy=yang=shiva=space=male were a close verbal account of it) suffices in itself for those who want to ‘live’, to maximise their existence.

Indeed, life is beautiful when properly understood and fulfilling; but the game of existence as a space-time being is harsh and it can be cruel with those who do not play by the rules. One thing is for sure, the game is JUST, balance as it based precisely in the ‘coincidentia oppositorum’, the coming together of its two extremes, entropy and information, which mix to create the infinite forms of energy of the Universe. You will have though to read at least 30 pages of this introduction to change your chip, and understand… It suffices to say that the people who closer understood it in the western tradition, the Greek and German philosophers, above them Aristotle and Leibniz felt it was the most perfect of all possible worlds. And it is, precisely because of its cruelty with those species who do NOT make the cut, and become extinct, for the game to have all its beauty.

And that is where the western tradition, which constantly tries to ‘dialog’ with an inexistent ‘mirror-God’ to get privileges, stumbles and makes the type of huge errors of conduct – since the game is one of behaviour, of form-in-action of in-form-ation – which come back to hunt them. As you should ‘do onto others what you want to be done onto you’, in the action-reaction processes of life and death.

 

III.

Conservation principles

 

Expansion of conservation principles to 5D and organic, fractal explanation of its components.

A membrane of angular moment or time clock encloses vital energy; self-centered in a monad-mirror whose lineal inertia moves the whole. To those 3 Conservation laws we add the inverse Dimotions of entropy and form moving through 3 planes at 4D generation and 5D entropic extinction, withinverse directionality when a system dies=splits with form going own and entropy going upwards, described in physics by E=Mc2. The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space and 5D logic metric equations (the laws of scales)   requires analysis of its ‘mathematical membranes’ that mirror organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, conserving as a zero sum of energy and information  5 Dimotions though 3 of those planes. So the conservation of energy and information extends from 1Dimotion of a membrane of angular momentum, 2D of lineal momentum, performed by its center and 3D of vital energy enclosed between both the conservation of 3 of its ∆§calar planes. The 3 conserved classic quantities reside in a single plane, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through the physical ‘centers of changes and masses’ ; while the 3 planes together with wormholes of flows of entropy sipping through the membrane and information moving between planes through the central singularity axis expand those laws to 3 coexisting scales defined by 5D metric:SxT= ¡±1.

Noether’s theorem considers that each conservation law of Physics, conservation of Lineal Inertia (1D¡ motion) or angular momentum (2D¡ motion) and energy (3D¡ motion), to which we add the 4th conservation law of 5D¡ entropy and 4D¡ social evolution or ‘zero sum worldcycles of existence’, is related to a symmetry of space-time, which obviously we must extend to the conservation of the scalar Universe and its 5th dimension of D=evolutionary inverse arrows, signified by those 2 inverse dimotions show in the next graph:

Nt.1: we use the term dimensional motion, ab. Сmotion for the 5arrows of time space which become ‘fractal forces’ in physics; and the term 5th Dimension of D=evolution for the whole range of scales=planes of exist¡ence, that is of stiences of the fractal Universe, keeping with the use of ‘metaphysical English’ changing slightly its wording.

The graph shows the NEW conservation law which ALLOWS small transfers of energetic entropy=pure motion and in-form-ation between scales, but determines a dual directionality of those arrows, with form going  inversely to energy either to a lower or upper plane, by liberating wholes into parts, while energy goes into an upper or lower nested Universe – being the paradigmatic case the beta decay or any physical big-bang that splits the dual fields of the system:

So we rephrase Noether’s theorem in terms of the METRIC LAWS OF CO-INVARIANCE of the fifth dimension, to define the co-invariance of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe for any ternary relative system of scales, self-centered in the scale we study the event.

Consider a key case of Forces, the entropic beta decay of a Neutron, which ‘misses’ energy and form (1/2 spin) producing a neutrino, v, which IS NOT in our light scale as we CANNOT DETECT IT WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC forces, and hence MUST belong to the ¡±4 plane; yet adding both planes we get the proper conservation, and further on allow us to place neutrino physics in the ‘scale’ of the cosmos. Yet while the reaction produces entropy in the lower plane, it also grows in form, in the upper plane, as the neutron breaks into two particles.

It is then part of the systematization of scalar physics within the larger context of Generational space-time (Gst), to define all the laws of scales of dimotions, as entropy processes will be inverse to social evolutionary dimotions, locomotion to perception and both merge into reproduction, which we express with subequations of the general metric of present states of reproduction=iteration:

1D vs. 2D. 4D vs. 5 D; so 1D x 2D = K(3D), 4D x 5D = K(3D),  1D±2D=0, 4D±5D=0, ARE general sub-equations of 5D metric which originate most equations of physics, when substituted by the proper constants of time and space for each dimotion. Let us consider an example in reproductive locomotion of quantum waves.

Conservation of all time motion: Law of the Least Time, fastest Space principle.

Conservation laws though can be resumed in a dual law of ‘east time used’ to achieve ‘largest territorial space’, ‘faster, larger’… Max. Si x Te, the maximization of existence all systems of Nature try to achieve. This is expressed in physics with the law of conservation is the least time principle: All systems of reality want to maximize its existence in time, and its reach in space. That is, all selfish mind-points of view, all superorganisms will try to embrace maximal space – locomotion, entropic feeding, reproduction of the system – in minimal time.

And this absolute law of all systems suffices to explain the deterministic program of all systems – the greed of people, their fat eating customs, the least time principle of physics, and its fundamental equation, the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism (the derivative of the actions of beings tends to zero, as the system moves through the shortest path in time); the program of reproduction, the pleasure of high speed cars, the behavior of black holes, you name it: systems program its actions to maximize its exist¡ence defined as its desire to accumulate more information for its  up and down high particle-head, more motion for its flat, moving ahead, long limbs/potentials, more reproductive energy for its wide body-wave.

Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.

Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’Dimotions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.

And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.

 

And the duality between those 2 ‘arrows or motions of space-time’, |-Motion, space or ‘Dimotions’ and cyclical motion, clocks of time or information, either perceived in stillness as lineal or cyclical form or in motion as lineal speed or cyclical speed structures the Universe.

All what you see are combinations of those 2 essential substances, very complex sometimes, but combinations of 2 elements, and the laws of those combinations is what the 5th dimension studies, since once we group them all we find regularities, synchronicities, patterns tat allow us to define space and time as a whole.

We see ‘Dimotions’ forms (lineal bodies, weapons, fields of energy-light) and its complementary systems of information processing of time processing (cyclical eyes and cameras, electric fields of light).

Each clock creates a discontinuous space-time, whose cyclical perimeter of in-form-ation encloses a piece of energetic space breaking reality into ∞ formal patterns; different time cycles with specific forms and frequencies. Thus the use of a single human clock that equalizes all of them misses 2 features of each of those time cycles:

– Its specific forms of in-form-ation in space, which gives birth to the main topological laws and Isomorphisms of the 5th Dimension (I).

– Its different speeds or frequencies. Since cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse function: ƒ(t)=1/T.

 

CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES

The universe is a fractal organism of 5 ‘Ðimotions’ of space-time.
To notice first that when we properly translate the jargon of physics to the unifying language of 5D, all physical systems are indeed made of 3 ‘dimotions’ across 3 scales (¡+1 gravitational, cosmological, ¡-thermodynamic; ¡-1, quantum scale):
CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES: Lineal + angular momentum = Energy

In the graph, the opposite approaches of 5D and classic physics. When we consider a problem on 5D we must first define a ‘ternary’ organic system, with its 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, Non-E with an inner volume of space-time through which multiple parallels can cross. In a classic problem those terms do come as boundaries in mathematical equations but the conceptual depth is missing as it is all about ‘locomotion changes. i.e. the fact that the 3 parts will produce 3 different geometries (hyperbolic energy, concave angular momentum, convex singularities) and connect differently (the singularity to other 5D planes, the membrane to the external world; the enclosed energy limited by both will play closed circles. So what matters in 4D is that the 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of the fundamental, ‘real particle’ of this Universe, a system with a membrane of cyclical clock-like momentum, self-centered into a central region where its vital energy and information converges, controlled by networks of energy and information – from nations with military borders, capitals with people controlling citizens with its information languages (Laws) and energy networks (monetary, economic systems) to the cell with a protein membrane, a DNA center of information and its Golgi networks of control of cytoplasm, to the  galaxy controlled with in-formative gravitational forces and vital energy provided by its stars and electromagnetic forces), this ternary system is the ‘logic’ essence of the fractal Universe – you also my friend have an enclosing membrane and brain of information, controlling with nervous informative networks and reproductive blood networks the cells, which reproduce the goods for the selfish brain, consuming 10 times more energy. So this is what we call a realist, organic model of sciences – which system scientists, complexity and information theory studies.

1D singularity + 2 D membrane = 3D vital energy.
They give the 3 conserved ‘fractal quantities’ of any super organism of space-time:
-Angular momentum (2D membrane).
-Lineal momentum (motion of the singularity)
-Vital energy (volume enclosed and managed between them).
This is the simplest structure we find in all scales of nature, from atomic systems with an electronic membrane and a nucleus singularity enclosing fields of gravitational and electromagnetic energy, to cells with protein membranes, DNA singularities and vital energy enclosed in cytoplasms, to nations, with a hard-military border, a capital-singularity and a vital energy of middle working reproductive class, to galaxies with a halo of strange, dark matter, a center of top quark black holes and the stars, mitochondria  that reproduce them both, to yourself with a sling membrane a nervous brain singularity and a reproductive body.
And this give us the 3 simplest conserved elements of reality, lineal motions (momentum), cyclical momentum and the vital energy reproduced between them.
The Universe is a fractal of 3 elements, space, time and its vital energetic combinations. The iteration of those 3 elements into finite fractal organisms put together create the puzzle of reality we see.
This might seem in first principles very simple but becomes more complex as we are talking of a ‘vital’ fractal, which has organic, bio-logical properties, besides topological ones, (which are the only accepted by the religion-dogma of a mathematical only universe) as its goal is to reproduce information (arguably a mathematical fractal also reproduces information departing from a generator, feedback equation, but its abstract jargon doesn’t recognize those properties).
So we can define it as an eternal, immortal Universe:
It is then clear that when a galaxy dies, as a quasar, or when the black hole, emits pure space accelerated through its axis, interstellar space expands and we see that as a redshift but in the plane of the galaxy, slowly vacuum space collapses into denser particles, shrinking space-time. Ergo there is no need for a cosmic big-bang, a hyperbolic exaggeration created using a lineal equation ‘VHod’ moving it to a remote past of which there is scanty evidence, as we show when studying in detail the theme in our posts on astrophysics.

A Universe of space forms: S@ and time motions: ∆ð

All what you see around is a tapestry of forms that are moving (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and space dimensions, and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the physical terms of ‘entropy’ and locomotion; which can be considered the two limits of reality: pure spatial form and pure temporal motion.
In physics they combine into ‘momentum’ and ‘energy’, and all what you need in physics to describe the Universe is lineal and cyclical momentum and energy (the 3 conserved quantity).
Yet form is clearly NOT real but a mental, still mapping in a language that orders the external world, in the same way the moving Earth appears to us still.
Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail at ‘smaller’ scales, the form also shows motion. Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. And we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.
What there is always there is motion; what humans study is form. This might seem very philosophical but is of extreme importance, as science is after all the linguistic mirror of the Universe in logic and geometric languages of thought.
In a more descriptive way in physical and biological systems the moving, lineal parts are forces/limbs, the energy, reproductive part are wave-bodies, the in-form-ative parst, heads/particles.
Forms in space, motions in time and its infinite combinations create the ternary Universe, which humans before so much details hid the forest understood in Eastern cultures: ‘yin-formation and yang-motion create the infinite qi-energy beings’ (Lao tse)
Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail particles at ‘smaller’ scales, their forms are also motions, rotary motions and vortices of time.
Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.
Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.
And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:

All clocks of time are cyclical motions which break reality into an inner region of vital energy, an angular momentum clock that encloses it and when regular a central singularity which can ‘perceive’ some how a mapping of the Universe that flows through the membrane. So mind, angular momentum and vital energy become the 3 parts of the clock and hence the basic super organism of the Universe.

WE ARE ALL MADE OF an external membrane of TIME CYCLES seen as motion or form, often made of similar smaller fractal cyclical entities (cells, atoms, national borders) that enclose with its ANGULAR momentum, a vital energy, its body-wave, self-centered into a monad-point that gauges the information of the whole system and beyond, measured by its ‘steady’ lineal trajectories in pursuit of the energy and information it needs to survive (LINEAL momentum). The topological properties of such systems are the most important, hence the importance of mathematics and its mirror images formed in the stillness of that central point singularity. But we shall soon see that to order all those systems we need ‘scales of different time cycles’ and speeds of motion, which will introduce fractal, organic properties, and to account for the survival of such ‘fragile’ motion-based ensembles we need the still central point-mind to be able to gauge information and automatically conscious or unconsciously enact a program of actions of survival to keep feeding on energy to reproduce its body and inform its mind, and move its limbs… The vital properties of life we ascribe only in an ego-trip to carbon atoms will turn out to be the essential features of cyclical time, vital energy and mind-singularities and so constantly we shall see it is all about those 3 ‘conserved’ quantities of physics albeit broken into infinite space-time beings, extended into infinite scales of size, absolutely relative with no preferential scale, mind type and or species, even if all feel the center of the Universe as they gauge information from that self-centered point.

So we shall close this very brief introduction to cosmology, to metaphysics, which is not so much concerned with the data and facts and equations of physics but with its ¡logic principles as there is scanty data on the ¡±4 planes, and we must deduce it as Mendeleiev did with the table of elements, from the Ðisomorphic properties of all beings, with the essence of the ‘reductionist’ Aristotelian error of physics, regarding ‘relativity of motion’: to fail to realize that the true question about Copernicus finding is to explain why ‘the Earth moves and doesn’t move at the same time’.

 

There is though a second bigger REASON, why we are a bit off with egos and human pretensions of uniqueness, which become sanguine in our analysis of big-bang theory, abrahamic religions and monetarist, capitalism and AI technoutopians: the absolute relativity of a Universe in which all beings are space-time beings, related morphologically and NO SCALE IS preferential scale, and likely the scales are infinite as the biggest symmetry we shall develop in the study of physics is that between the atom and the galaxy, likely a similar fractal ‘antiparticle’ like of a larger repetitive Universe.

If so, if the scales are infinite, albeit slightly different from atom to galatom… we are truly infinitesimal… and so a bit more of realism and awareness of our absolute nothingness would go a long way for humans to survive instead of destroying the planet with its ‘machines’ and ‘weapons’ – just another evolving form of ‘meta life’, be aware of its fragility as a mere CNOH organism, and keep happy just to exist, and in awe of the immensity of the universe.

Instead, what humans, both verbal creationists+scientific creationists that think to speak the language of God, words or numbers, believe as sacred dogma on their nature and that of the Universe?

Creationist physicists have reduced the entire universe by virtue of expanding a simple lineal equation, ‘Vhod’, similar to the word God, back to the past, to a singularity point they can hold in their hands, with a limited lifetime so they can feel to know it all, and go about congresses bragging they know reality till the 10ˆ-43 infinitesimal second. We shall show how all this is basically assumptions of creationist mathematicians, which reject the experimental method and facts whenever they break his assumptions, obsessed for punching well above what a humind can truly know, with a much sounder model which truly respects the facts of cosmology.

While on social sciences, the majority of humans believe in the inverse concept invented by Abrahamic religions that we are immortal and eternal, above heavens and Earth.

So the universe is now by religious big-bang + Abrahamic religions infinitesimal and we humans, are infinite, LOL, this is exactly the inverse of what serious physical and social sciences, modeled in this web shows: we are infinitesimal minds, watching an infinite Universe, reduced to the infinitesimal still mind-languages that make us confuse the whole Universe with our ‘mind worlds’, which put in an equation reads:

O-Mind (still language mirror) x ∞ Universe (fractal space-time beings and scales) = K (constant world).

Men confuse this 0 x ∞ = K, fundamental equation of algebra (as it includes all other numbers), such as they make the constant world mapped by its languages with the totality, and as it is seen from the perspective of the mind, they think, their nose is bigger than Andromeda, and as it is a still mind that reduces motions to fit in the brain all the information, they tend to see it all dead.

It follows that the interaction between parts and wholes of organisms are essential also to understand the mind. And because the Universe have an scalar nature, as minds-mirrors reduce reality to inner mappings, making it all a game of reproductive mirrors, if we were to ‘give another’ of the many kaleidoscopic views of reality possible.

So perhaps the biggest barrier for 5D to become the philosophy of science is that embedded ego-paradox natural to any mind-structure. So an ant which only perceives es pheromones and reduces the Universe to the world of its paths from the queen-God to the jungle food will have obviously another ego paradox, as expressed in a beautiful Hindi tale of vishnu-child coming to talk to Indra-king to explain him that Indras become ants in the next soul transmigration. Think of me as a better mirror than Indra on the minimalist nature of all ant-minds.

So as Jesus said, you have to become a child to enter the kingdoms of knowledge. Indra, the creationist believer in the power of weapons and technology, or digital number or words of God, akin today to the scientist, the politician/economist or the religious man, that is 99.9999999% of people likely will reject this work (as its null stats prove). But that fact might just be part of the role of man in this planet, increasingly obvious: to kill carbonlife including itself and terraform Earth into a world of digital machines, whose language we worship. All what I can be proud of then, is the fact that this blog is the product of a humind (ab. human mind), it didn’t need AI or digital computing to complete its mirror, and it is far better than any billion $ mechanical machine-mirror, computer or LHC accelerator in its focus on the laws of tao, of spacetime, of the ilogic complex Universe.

So while I apologize for not being a supercomputer with all the data of all scientists perfectly ordered in those 3rd and fourth line, to please the Manual Chicago of style and being able to discuss this or other gene, this or other particle, with all its full properties, and yes, acknowledge you know more of your discipline, the point is, by putting the sun in its place, by making space and time the underlying reality, and properly define its properties a lot of specialist errors and unfocused mirrors are put back in track. It is up to mankind to stick in old mirrors with a lot of detail but a clear bias, or accept that as it happens every other century, there is a better model for space and time, which could spark a revolution of the size the last better model of time (Einstein’s relativity) and Space (quantum theory) did.

Of course Planck and Einstein just started the field of quantum theory with its h-planck constant and the particle-wave duality of the photon… They didn’t do much more than that. But without it, the rest would have never arrived to Dirac’s theory, SU3 color chromodynamics etc. So at least you should respect the first steps and stops of the pioneers, if the ‘whole’ seems to be right, as it seemed to Galileo, Copernicus slightly off track circular orbits, and seemed to Schrodinger, the simple truths of Einstein and Broglie particle-wave dualities.

This is what this blog provides, the first steps… of “humanity’s ascension to this new realm of existence”… (: even if so far google and academia ignore us ); that is, the realm of the scalar fifth dimension of ‘dust of space-time’, take it or leave it. Truth was meant to be objective, and so it won’t pump up your ego so much, as physicists of big-bang theories and abrahamic religions do. Sorry, I can describe reality but NOT changing it to please your happy self-centered infinitesimal mind…

Correspondence principle between locomotion and all dimotions

Unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.
So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).
SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study.
So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.

It follows then that what mathematical physicists measure in spacetime is a ‘step’ of minimal size and duration, and for that aim they use ‘derivatives’, a mathematical operandi that ‘reduces’ the measure to the ‘infinitesimal’ moment of present time and the smallest possible step taken (∂t, ∂s), to avoid any internal informative ‘long-time range change’. So we write speed in Galilean relativity as an infinite sum of infinitesimal present measures: ∂v=∂s/∂t. And so did Einstein, when he reduced spacetime measure to ‘simultaneous’, present ‘derivative=instantaneous steps’, adding his ct-correction factor:

∂S²=∂Sx²+∂Sy²+∂Sz²-c²∂t²

And that is fine. The best way to measure translation in space is adding all those minimalist steps and disregard internal change of form and information (which would make more complex those motions as when a system explodes and the single motion breaks into multiple ones). What is wrong and it has been a huge handicap to advance our understanding of spacetime and information and its changes inside beings is to consider as so many people do that to measure locomotion is ALL what we need to know about time=change. 

This shall change from now on, once the 5th dimension of time space enter mainstream science. As the fifth dimension of ‘time’ from an absolute past to an absolute future, expands vastly our understanding of time, its causality and ‘repetitive clock-like cycles’ of events.

From now on, time will no longer be a simple lineal dimension used to measure small, present steps of an external locomotion but a bidimensional cycle, as all clocks of time are. This is obvious geometrically as when we add a ‘dimension’ to a line of time space we get a ‘circle’. And it is obvious logically, since all systems in time return to its origin from birth to extinction; all events repeat, and all laws of science are just ‘inferences’ from the cyclical repetition of time events.

The fifth dimension thus will explain both the causality of time events, its world cycles of existence and the repetitive patterns of ‘stience’ (the exist¡ence of space-time organisms).

As we shall consider the 4 С formalism a simplified version of 5Ð, or the ‘limit’ of knowledge we can acquire if we reduce time-space dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) to a single one, locomotion, of which physicists have exhausted truly all knowledge but ‘forgot’, for we, human beings is most important to know besides the worldlines of locomotion, the world cycles of change in our forms of ‘in-form-ation’, namely our life and death cycle.

So the fifth dimension will study the missing dimension of time cycles that make reality possible to describe as it is: a series of beings which are born, evolve, grow and dissolve back completing its zero-sum of existence.

The change in the in-form-ation of beings: the missed ‘time arrow’ in physics.

We all know time=motion=change is not only of locomotion-position in space or external change, but also internal motion=change; that is change in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings, as when you are born, grow, live, change, wrinkle and die…

This IS what we call here the fifth dimension which is NOT an impossible dimension of space but a very real dimension of TIME=motion=change in the information of beings.  So we shall call it a ‘Ðimotion’, ab. for Dimensional motion. We thus affirm that there are two type of fundamental ‘Dimotions’ of timespace, change in the external Dimotion of beings or locomotion and change in the internal form of the being, or Dimotion of in-form-ation, form-in-action, studied mostly by biology. But both Ðimotions should apply to all systems, physical, biological and linguistic, mental.

Most scientists study only one type of change: physicists study a Universe built only with the ‘Dimotion’ of locomotion, which in its most extreme case, they call entropy; biologists study the Time-Dimotion of information. And this restricts both its field of inquire and bias the results they obtain, since the beginning of a thorough, proper study of all timespace changes must consider that DUALITY of timespace changes, both together. 

And for that reason, the science of duality was born, which is the science I used to preside in the International congress of systems sciences (ab. ISSS), the association where the modern discipline was born at the death of Einstein at the Macy’s congress, back in the 50s. It would be the foundational congress of the sciences of information and cybernetics, when the foremost scientists of that age came together, realizing the approach of physicists to time was lacking and the merge of biology and physics required first a proper formalism of both concepts of time, which is the goal achieved in this blog.

Welcome then to the infinite fractal Universe of mind-mirrors, monads, worlds that seems infinite but are absolutely relative, all hidden in the infinitesimal fractal point of a mind, which is an island-universe in itself.

Abstract: We have come to the final element of reality that encompasses them all, the energy world cycle.

Symbols. As a world cycle represents the whole in its time, full realisation from birth to extinction, we shall use the same symbol than for all the ages of the being, Ω, but in minimalist form, ω, the last letter of the greek alphabet. A world cycle indeed is both the alpha and omega, yet the alpha is omega, because time is cyclical. It is indeed the sum of all the cycles of the being, between birth and extinction. As it is measured in each instant of existence by the volume of energy of the being, such as if we know the function of existence, to know at a certain time its energy will give us the point of the world cycle in which the being exists, we shall change the symbol for energy, to ∃, the symbol for present existence in logic thought. So e will be the symbol of entropy:  e x i = st, ∫e x i = ∃ω

As energy is precisely the integral of momenta and actions of entropy and information of any system of reality. So the sum of those actions finally web not a worldline but a world cycle, which overwhelmingly tends to be conservative, in as much as an other reproduced world cycle takes place, but in extreme detail unless a reproductive cycle has happened derived of the maximal point of the curve, during the mature age of the cycle, ω: e xi , the cycle can be not-conservative.

This must be considered we see cycles as closed cycles when they are more like waves, with a distribution which in its peak reproduces a new wave, but in any case world cycles are best measured by energy in the simplest physical systems and when we consider more complex world cycles, energy still stands in its ‘derivative’, momentum, as the best parameter to indicate the phase of the world cycle in which the being exists, such as Max. Energy will be the point of maturity, as a simple mathematical rule shows:  Max. e x i (e=i).

That is a product is maximal when both numbers which ad a value, are equal to each other: 5 x 5 > 6 x 4…

So the maximal ‘instantaneous momentum’ of a being happens in its classic age of the world cycle, while its total integral will give us a zero value, origin of all the fundamental equations of energy in physics (Hamiltonians, least time principle and lagrangians).

Yet we are expanding those concepts, from present mathematical momentum, to existential momentum and top predator force, reached in the classic age of the world cycle, and from an energetic ‘measurable quantitatively’ worldcycle of physics to the life and death world cycle of any super organism. So we are not going to be pretentious and ‘reduce’ a human word cycle to a hamiltonian. We are NOT gurus and dogmatic religious physicists, but philosophers of sciences, and once the concepts are clarified, it turns out quite obviously that in social sciences, art will represent better the worldcycle of a civilisation, literature the worldcycle of a human being, and obviously genetics that of a cell, evolution that of a species and so on – languages which are not specifically mathematical but code the 3±∆º elements of the being with different jargons.

And so ∃ω, will be our preferred symbol, for the world cycle of energy, within the routine of GST, which uses similar but not exactly equal to the common symbols of ‘science’: stience, ωorldcycle, supœrganism, ∏ime, §pace, ∃nergy, etc.

 

On the other hand, the Spe, big-bang arrow of entropy is one of death and dissolution of information in any scale:

image021In the graph we can see how the Universe creates ‘waves’ of super-organisms that travel worldcycles, mostly life and death cycles across the ∆ST Dimensions of ‘existence’. Seen in this manner from the perspective of the ‘dimensions’ of form, of information, what we see are just ‘manifestations’ of a deeper program, the ∆ST worldcycles of creation and extinction of ‘existential curves’… in ∆ST Dimensions.

It can bee then anything, any species of the Universe, from an atom to a human, from a galaxy to an ant.

Any of those ∆ will however co-exist and evolve in time, through 3 scales of social complexity:

∆-1: Its cellular scale where it will be ‘born’, and then evolve with a reproduced ‘herd’ of similar species, till emerging into its individual state. Then as an individual it will participate into:

∆+1: a society, or ecological network where it will obtain its Entropy and information, till…

∆-1: the moment of death in which it will dissolve back into its cellular scale. In the graph in physical scales the process is understood as a big bang.

Finally the arrow of evolution of information is a vortex of creation of a singularity mind that co-exists across several scales of the 5th dimension

Thus systems undergo during its ‘time evolution’ from past to future, between birth and extinction, not only the ‘worldline’ trajectory that physicists describe, that is a series of spatial motions, but a worldcycle, through the added new dimensions of informative complexity that makes the system, grow in social size, emerge into ‘higher planes of existence’ and regress to its cellular state.

In this sense science describes those cycles with different parameters of Entropy and information, as it does in the case of the life of stars and galaxies:

image067

 

Mathematical physics.

If past-entropy and future information converge in present momentum: m x v and the integral of momentum is the conserved energy cycle we can easily translate for the simplest space-time world cycles – those of motion of physical systems, the laws of the larger system of motions of ‘information=time’ of the Universe.

In a more mathematical form, a world cycle is the sum of all the actions a system realise during its cycles of existence.

And so it is closely related to the Hamiltonians and Lagrangians of Mathematical Physics:

 ∫ ∑ (e x i) ds dt

A motion of time when integrated into a zero sum, closed in space-time by a return to the initial state of the particle-beings, which moves, becomes a world cycle. And the infinite sumes of zero sums, the infinite never-ending world cycle of the whole time Universe.

We can consider that the motions of time cancel each other, creating natural tendencies towards a world cycle.

As a generation of information is inverse to an extinction by dissolution of information.

A locomotion that spends energy is inverse to a a feeding action that absorbs it.

A perceptive moment in silence, mapping the Universe is inverse to a communicative actions that tries to modify that Universe.

And a reproduction of the present state is a reflexive action equal to itself.

So the total sum of actions and growths and diminutions of the parameters of the being tend to a final zero-sum or world cycle.

In the graph all sum of actions in time bring a world cycle, in which finally the arrow of generation of information inverts into an explosive big bang of entropy called death in which information expands as a field of pure entropy.

 The sum of cyclical space-time actions of any super organism trying to absorb energy for its body, information for its mind, reproduce that information to exist beyond death, and evolve socially with similar forms into larger wholes, creates an imbalance, due to the excess of ‘informative actions’ over energetic actions, which brings a constant growth of information, that warps the being and finally kills it, when all information is exhausted, in the explosion of death.

It is the world cycle of existence which all beings follow, except in the few cases in which a more complex strategy ensured the privileged species its immortality…

How can we represent formally a world cycle? Simple as a sum of energy and time actions, which a being performs trying to maintain a balance between its E and I quanta of spatial and tempera existence.

So as the being, absorbs and emits energy and information, ±∆e,i and reproduces both, exi, in balanced states (S=t) with its larger and smaller ∆±1 worlds in which it will seed and feed, we can develop a series of actions in space and time, whose sum along a path of time or duration and a path of space or motion and feeding territory, will bring about a quantitative description of the world cycle of the being, basis of a qualitative description of all its events as a ‘narrative’ of the 7 motions of time:

∫∑ e x i ds dt=0

In the equation of the world cycle we resume all events, ±∆e, i, exi, ∑, of emission and absorption of energy and information, its reproduction, and social evolution with similar quanta,  ∑, across the 3 ∆ scales of co-existence.

We will first study those time cycles of existence and its equation of 3 ages, and then consider the causality that creates those world cycles as a sum of the 5 different type of actions of the Universe:

Å=∫å=∑,æ,e,Ï,Œ û

The 3 motions of time IN PHYSICS.

In this post we shall study the 3 motions-ages-dimensions of time, Past, entropy; present, repetition and future, information, the sequential life-death cycles they cause, and its symmetry with the 3 parallel forms of space that synchronically create all the systems of the Universe:

In the graph, above, the 3 time motions of the Universe, ‘explosive, big-bang, decelerating expansive motions’  with maximal energy, repetitive, wave-like motions and implosive, vortex-like accelerated inward motions, with maximal information.

The space-time ternary isomorphism deals with the 3 ages of Time and its symmetry with the 3 organs of space, as those 3 parts of space (Sp-Limbs/fields<ST-wavebodies>Tƒ(heads-particles) dominate each sequential age of Time, the spatial past (Sp), the Present (ST) and the Temporal, cyclic, informative future, Tƒ.

We can in that regard consider 2 generator equations for the synchronic and diachronic views:

Time view: Ps>ST>Ft.
Space-view: Sp>TS<Tƒ
The reader will observe which is the fundamental difference between a temporal and spatial view of reality.

In time, systems constantly convert Motions of space into ‘forms’, indicated by the > symbol, through 3 ages, past-youth, preSenT repetition and future information.

While the spatial synchronic view is not ‘lineal’ in their constant use of motion converted into form but focuses on maintaining and reproducing the relative present as the limbs move the body and the brain informs it, coming both together into that present form.

So we write the Sp><Tƒ confluence as Sp x Tƒ = Sp-Present, whereas > and < come together into a product.

This is the essential duality of the Universe, its 2 relative organisations. One the synchronic view conserves the present by focusing into the body-wave element, which iterates and reproduces with the help of the entropic motions and informative order of limbs/fields and heads/particles, the system making it a relative discontinuous immortal system (generation after generation). On the other hand the arrow of time-life increases information till collapsing all the information of the system. So how the system balances itself?

2 answers derive from those facts:

On one side, because when we add both views there are more (3) > arrows than < arrows, the overall motion of systems is towards >> excess of information and ageing.
On the other hand to restore the process this >> excess of informative arrows is compensated at the end of the informative 3rd age by an explosion, << of entropy and death that erases all the information, Ft<< Ps. And this happens to all systems, so the total is a zero sum of formal motions.
It is all that simple, that harmonic, that just, that immortal and that horrifying for anyone who is closed into its ego-point of view and cannot accept the zero-sum balance of the sum of both cycles.

Below, 2 representations of the sequential order of those motions in most life-death cycles, in scientific and philosophical terms.

 

The Universe is a game of 3 finite time motions, which inter-act with its ‘intelligent spatial ∂till forms’, to create the patterns of life-death cycles, and simultaneous organisms that structure reality.

This truth has been known to Eastern philosophers for millennia. But in the west only the dialectic eastern european schools started by Leibniz (who translated the I ching, introduced binary numbers, and defined fractal points and zero-points – monads), had a worldview of this more complex reality.

Unfortunately absolute space-time carried the day and has obscured the fundamental dialectic, paradoxical, ‘taoist’, principles of time that structure all systems. In the graph, the eastern most clear symbolic formulation of those ultimate principles in the Korean yin-yang, ternary groups, and its equivalent modern formulation as a life-death cycle that goes through 3 ‘fixed points’ of maximal energy (youth-past-entropic motions), balanced, steady states, Sp=Tƒ (adult, reproductive age) and informative 3rd ages (reflected in the broken 3-yin triad of the flag) that precede the explosion of death.

Those 3 key points define the 3 intervals of most ‘existential functions’,  from the world cycles of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time, to the Hamiltonians of Energy (a similar concept to that of the motions of time) of quantum physics and classic mechanics. Those 3 time arrows put together in sequential cycles completes a total zero sum, which conserves the eternal formal motions of the Universe, establishing a basic sequential life-death order:

Past-entropy (youth)> Present-repetition (adult age)>Future information (3rd age) << Past-death-entropy.

 

THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY IN WORLDCYCLES

Tƒ<|s: cyclic and lineal time/forms. 

Since all beings occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time in its motions, we define all beings as space-time beings, which switch and beat between both states.In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception: Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space quanta and time clocks (charges and masses in physical space, circadian cycles in biological systems) moving in cyclical paths.

image037

The key to the understanding of space or lineal speed, one of the two primary substances of the Universe, and its counterpart, time clocks of cyclical form, is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend?

Of course physicists  measure those different time cycles with the concept of frequency of a wave or a turning wheel, the inverse of time duration:

ƒ=1/T

Often associated to a wave length, or wheel perimeter: ƒ x λ= S, which measured the distance of a wave or wheel translation, uncoiled ƒ times. But the details of those cycles got lost in the process of simplifying them.

The mind perceives with little detail, most motions of large or tiny objects, and so instead of distinguishing its quanta in motion, it distinguishes just the trace of the motions as distances. So we say that space is enlarging its distance between galaxies or that galaxies move at great speeds. We thus establish a dual concept:

  • Lineal fixed form, that we write with a single symbol, S: |- Space.
  • And Lineal motion, Lineal Time, T. And so the study of both together, is what we call mechanics, in which time is indeed a parameter of space, but only Lineal time, V=S/t, used to measure distances in motion.

On the other hand, cyclical form, in-form-ation, curved in different dimensions, is the other ‘fundamental shape of space’, which seen in motion gives birth to the other parameter of reality, cyclical clocks of Time: Tƒ=O-Times ≈ Form; Information.

We shall reserve the names Times, to such cyclical clock motions and Information to its fixed spatial forms. While ‘Time’, T will be the lineal variety and ‘Space’, its lineal dimension. So departing from those elements, the Universe starts its game which is made of ‘beats’ that transform form into motion, lines into cycles. And since lines are the shortest distance, fastest motion, it becomes the most evident motion; while cycles have the minimal perimeter and stay turning around a point, so they become the most evident forms. Hence there is a relationship between: Line ≈ motion and Cycle ≈ form, which shows in the incapacity of most beings to define cyclical motions, often seeing instead particles or points, when observing rotary systems (such is the case of the Earth).

In the same manner we perceive Time Clocks with fast motions (I.e. a turning wheel) as cyclical form and large rotary systems with slow motions as solid spherical or disk-like forms. So Galileo said e pur si muove, e pur no muove, since he knew the Earth moved rotating around itself and the sun but we saw it fixed. And so we call this paradox, the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science, though never was properly explained and equal, time clocks with cyclical motions, T  and ‘cyclical Forms’: O.

And we use the symbol Tƒ, to express the similarity of both concepts: Form ≈ Clock of Time ≈ Tƒ, which we measure with the inverse function of Lineal Time Duration, that is, with the frequency or speed of those cycles which carries in its form and speed the information of the Universe. This allow us to define quantitatively one of the basic transformations of our O-|, T-S dual parameters:

Tƒ=1/T=Cyclical motion is the inverse of lineal motion.

And so we deduce also that the parameters of spatial distances and circular distances are also inverse.

Yet Form and in-form-ation – a form carried through the displacement of a wave are also related. Information is a cyclical form with a bit of ‘lineal motion’ added’.

On the other hand, Lineal SpaceTime and energy, which is a form moving in lineal fashion are  also related. So we write: Space=Lineal Time Speed≈ Kinetic Energy.

Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought. But they can be treated as such in a general vision, which however is adequate only to study systems, larger than those of human beings, such as cosmic space, but fail to give us the necessary details to analyze smaller world us those of quantum physics.  Thus both concepts have a quantity of truth, but the higher truth=information is in the detailed analysis which makes:

Absolute space-distances= quanta of lineal energy motion.

Absolute Time= Sum of infinite cyclical clocks of time which carry the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.

Once this is understood, we will have given an enormous stride in the correct direction to understand ‘fractal, scalar space-times’, the formalism that better explains the fact we are all organic systems made of ‘vital space=energies and cycles of time=life-death world cycles. 

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws. It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:

– The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).

– And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being. Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in MHz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.

The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.

We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.

THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF ALL PHYSICAL SCIENCES: ‘GALILEAN AND EINSTEINIAN RELATIVITY’, which now becomes fully expressed.

Accordingly I called this expansion of modern physics, Absolute Relativity. Since the ultimate teaching of Einstein’s discoveries was to validate Leibniz: we exist in a Universe of infinite, relative clocks of time, each of them breaking space into an inner and outer region of space (first law of topology, knot theory) and relative scales of reality, none of which is when we normalize their frequency of time cycles and size of its steps, more important than other…

Absolute Relativity essentially completes the insights of Leibniz and Einstein on the multiple nature of time clocks that run to different speeds. And its consequences and discoveries are bond to r=evolve the way we perceive the meaning of time itself.

And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

All this said another approach to the dualities of the universe is to consider that Time=change=motion is all, while space is a ‘still’ present picture of time:

4920050_orig

In the graph, physicists and humans in general ‘Spe’ space, but have a surprising difficulty to understand ‘the causal flow of time’, by the very nature of its senses, dominated by the I=eye mind, and those of instrumental science, (which starts its experimental method by taking ‘stills’ of time, that portray space with telescopes, accelerators and microscopes). So they consider that time is the 4th dimension of space, as earlier scientists thought that the Sun was the satellite of the Earth, despite the obvious supremacy of the sun… of time over space, which MUST BE defined as a still ‘cut’ or ‘instant of present’, ∂t, in the total flow of times.

So we write the fundamental equation of the Universe in a new derivative form:

S = ∂ t  -> ∫s = t

… from where we shall derive through logic, mathematical reasoning all other equations.

While relativity tell us that we can make sense of both models as both the space and time, earth and sun’s relative different points of view make sense from the subjective point of view of the observer (so from the Earth’s point of view, the sun do seem to move around us, and from an spatial point of view, we can make time, taking only an instant, a parameter of space, ∂t=∂s/v, the higher truth is according to Ockam’s principle

For a deep analysis at mathematical level of time and space, with the quantitative laws of physics, Space must be considered a slice of present Time in each infinitesimal quanta of ‘perception’ of it, dt. Hence we perceive space as ‘still’ and time as ‘motion’. This stop-space and go-time duality is at the core of the Universe. It is also the mechanism by which the mind can reduce the ‘total information of the Universe’ to fit it in its relative infinitesimal ‘0-point:

O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Constant mapping of reality.

It is thus necessary to go beyond the naive realism of physicists to grasp an objective reality beyond the ‘still mappings’ of the mind and its ‘stop-go’, perception of information, similar in an inverse fashion to the stop-go way we perceive film in continuous motion. In this inverse relationship a Universe made of different type of ‘time-motions’ become stopped in mind stills, which then change slowly as those film photograms from ‘infinitesimal to infinitesimal of time’.

Tim is then motion, as opposed to space, which is a fixed form, a moment of the time flow seen in stillness, often just in the mind of the perceiver.

The universe conserves ‘time’, motion, not ‘space’, the stopping maya of the mind –  ‘space’ stops the flows of time, and so the mind means nothing, to the Universe.

Human brains cannot fit all the information of the Universe.

So infinitesimal brains-monads, reduce dimensions, eliminate motion and ‘depth’ so they can fit 5D into the infinitesimal brain’s still spatial mapping, aka O-mind x ∞ universe, in only 2 D….

Our mind thus has lost 3 direct experienced dimensions of reality, depth (we put together 2D from 2 eyes to create the illusion of depth), motion, 4D in that present slice of reality we see, and then the long time dimensions of past to future and future to past we call 5D.

It simple eliminates all that to create a spatial, still mapping of reality, and for that purpose it considers a certain point, normally that of the ego, in the past the earth, the sun, now the galaxy space-time or ‘light space-time’, since Einstein.

But this process of stopping reality, measuring it with a mind and establishing an scaffolding of distorted knowledge is not ALL and by denying some basic dimensions (5D past to future future to past flows) it reduces the human mind to a short of pictorial, spatial still planiland without the dimension of long time.

The result is a simplified, still, dead reality with no flow. Minds=scholars ‘kill’ reality into abstract thoughts and then do kill reality with their actions to ‘project’ what they have in their imagination.
But Time motion never ceases. This was perhaps the biggest discovery of a fractal theorist, Mehaute, which realised that when energy ends, and a system freezes it starts to create information, the inverse arrow – crystallises, keeps ultimately moving time in the inverse dimension of form, spatial, static formal creation.

The beat of time thus might change its direction, its harmonic tones but will never stop

Scientists do NOT understand the concept of the eternity of time, and hence of the Universe and all its systems.

Since if time is motion and motion never stops but transforms back and forth between lineal motions and cyclical motions, then it never dies. But unfortunately after Galileo made time lineal and ‘cyclical time’ became something else, the engine of reality, the beat between the two poles of all systems, disappeared as the engine of change and all what speculative physics and numbers…

Thus today Physicists don’t have knowledge of the first principles:

  1. An immortal Universe (if it had finite duration, T, probability that we exist in that finite time, since non-existence would be infinite (T-existence/∞ non-existence) = 0, ergo as we do exist existence of time motions is infinite.
  2. So what happens is that |-time, lineal momentum and O-time angular momentum constantly transform into each other, and the variations are enormous. As we move into more complex combinations, then is easier to see that conversation in the ‘time’ element of any 4 vector (which is the best part of Einstein, or rather minkoski as you can use it for any ‘time parameters’). So kinetic energy-mass (lineal cyclical time in the cosmic scale also conserves, energy charge, is conserved, and so on…

in the Universe there are many different motions, all local and so we cannot hold truth the concept of a single time-clock as Newton did. Einstein discovered this fact in relativity, when he said (at the time): i am the only physicists that seem to think clocks tic at different speeds in different parts of the Universe. And yet scientists still use the concept of an absolute total space-time for the entire Universe. The number of errors derived of this conception are many.

For example, physicists ‘expand local measures’ to infinity, and bring from local proofs global theories of the Universe, which are by no means certain.

The graphs shows the case of the Cosmic big-bang, which expands the local measure of expanding space between galaxy to the whole Universe, as absolute space-time means a continuous global expansion. Yet in relational, fractal space-time, where space continuity is a mirage of the mind, this perpendicular expansion on the y-axis of the black hole, which expands space-time (distance-motion) by shooting through its polar Kerr axis, dark energy, radiation and matter, is balanced by the CONTRACTION of space in the vortex-plane of the galaxy, where stars contract space-time into mass and curved gravitation.

Another key related case of global expansion is the concept of a single ‘long-term’ time arrow called entropy that expands a phenomena found only in molecular, thermodynamic reactions (molecular entropy) to the whole Universe WITHOUT realising that the expansive entropy of lineal electromagnetic forces is balanced by the implosive, in-formative arrow of gravitational forces. Those 2 simple examples on 2 ‘sacred dogmas’ of physics show how important is the concepts of space and time to fully grasp the foundations of the Universe and as we shall see of all sciences.

Further on, the idea that the Universe will come to a halt comes from another mind paradox: we see all in still, so we think of masses as substance, but they are pure accelerated motion, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration.

And when we observe the quantum world we do see masses as vortices of accelerated motion. So again, if time=motion is the ultimate substance of the Universe and stillness is a mirage of our perception of reality in small ‘derivatives’ of time (which is how physicists measure space-time: ∂v=∂s/∂t), the concept of a dying Universe would be another mirage of the mind’s ‘spaces’. As motion never ends, merely changes from its rotary, angular momentums or time clocks to its lineal momentums or lineal motion. And indeed, both angular momentum and lineal momentum are conserved quantities of an immortal universe where the fundamental equation is that duality of time motions (and its duality of still, perceived forms in space):

                   O-cyclical clocks of time (angular momentum) <=> |-Lineal time durations (lineal inertia)

Which in the case of physical systems explains, for example, the meaning of E=Mc2, where a cyclical vortex of time, a mass becomes a lineal motion in space, an energy, and vice versa.

And this duality of time motions, lineal inertia and cyclical inertia, which combine into all the possible relative curves of reality is the next fact we must correct since it is the next big error brought about by our founding fathers, in this case Galileo.

We thus define a dual flow of time, and space as a still picture of time. And since time is not commutative, that is the future and the past are different flows, we do have now a way to define them: an inward, accelerated vortex of time which increases the frequency and hence the form, the information of its motion, is an arrow of future; and it is inverse to a decelerating, expanding uncoiling time clock, which is an arrow of entropic past. And in the middle, a steady state, indistinguishable inertial lineal distance-motion is space.

What is then more important, time or space? Obviously Time, even if in our civilisation, based in ‘images’, still images of spatial ‘states’ are more important, as ‘time cannot be seen’ in its inverse flows of past entropy and future information.

Hence the growing indifference in our visual world towards the meaning of time, its long arrow of informative evolution, the meaning of death and its inverse arrow of devolution, the purpose of casual logic, and all related themes, of which we cannot get shallow pictures or use differential, still, present instant equations.

We humans used to understand the world logically with temporal verbs and words and then only made pictures of its secondary details.

So classic definitions of Time started as logic and causal propositions. But now this depth of knowledge is increasingly gone.

Time in that sense was defined always as ‘change’, or rather the ‘perception of change’. So when some place to which we return, hasn’t changed we say it ‘seems as if time has not passed’. Change then according to Aristotle is internal change studied by biology either in evolution or in the life-death cycle or external change, called translation in space, motion. There is also social change and then there is the mental perception of change. So we talk of 4 temporal ‘changes-motions’, which define the 4 fundamental disciplines of science.

On the other hand space was perceived as stillness, the opposite of temporal motion. And the science of Space geometry was the study of still,  geometrical forms.

Then the equations used to describe space become also still moments. And as such space can be considered an instant, a slice of the flow of time, like a still photography of the Universe around us. And indeed, physicists still define space with derivatives, which are instants in time, pictures of the ‘speeds and time motions’ of the Universe: ∂s=∂v∂t, or the equivalent instantaneous measures of light-space or curved gravitation, in Einstein’s metrics.

Those are thus the initial definitions, corroborated by the equations of physics (latter we shall see that relativity merely elaborated on the earlier Galilean equations).

But the problem today is that those simple, all-revealing concepts (time as motion, of which there are at least 2 types, informative, cyclical forms under topological internal change or BIOLOGICAL CHANGE, and energetic,  external lineal, moving change or PHYSICAL change), have not been fully understood and/or properly formalised, since the artillery master liquidated cyclical motion and Aristotle became the ‘bete noir’ of physicists.

Yet even mathematics is founded in logic, the language of time. So we do start with a logical, verbal, temporal, causal understanding of space and time. And such logic though brings a clear definition:

If space is a still picture of time, which we constantly perceive, space is ‘present’, and since it seems to repeat itself, it is a dynamic, reproductive, iterative present.

On the other hand time motion is change with a clear tendency to cyclical inward motions. And so biological change, which last longer in time, is related to the increase of form, of information, that increases in evolution and through the life ages till time reaches an old, wrinkled, inward informative age.

Thus we arrive to a rather simple, obvious fact – time has 3 dimensions of motion:

Past-energy-entropy-disorder< present-repetition (space) > future-information-order.

Philosophically and physically this equation of the 3 motions of time is essential. It defines the fact that we see present still space despite being all a flow of time (since we do NOT see past and future). But it also implies that past, present and future are intimately connected by causal, logic time laws we shall unveil; since time cycles repeat themselves, and so in this repetitive causal logic we find the origin of the predictive power of scientific equations.

As Einstein put it, the separation between past, present and future is an illusion, as time cycles repeat through present moments and that is the origin of ALL the regularities of the universe and the existence of scientific laws.

It also implies that the ‘physicists’, only future (entropy) is just 1/3rd of the equation of time motions.

As all systems grow in information with age, our civilisation, the life beings, the galaxy falling into the formative black hole, technology, etc. And all systems try to iterate its space-time to reach a relative immortality, from quarks and electrons, the simplest time cycles, which decouple into new quarks and electrons, to galaxies which give birth through black hole jet emission to smaller irregular galaxies, ALL MOVES, ALL ITERATES, ALL GROWS ITS INFORMATION, and so we might say all is alive, as those are properties that define life. And this is another huge philosophical change: a pantheist Universe.

But are we right, wouldn’t time be an illusion and spatial geometry more powerful. Not, and this is proved linguistically:

Since logic, the language of time, as Frege, Boole and modern computers show is the mother of mathematics, the ‘causal reason’ of its theorems, since time is more important than space, a mere ‘present slice’ of the total flow of time that seems to be ‘still’ when we take a ‘still present’ picture of it – what we call time.

Thus we cannot shun off as physicists do the logic principles of sequential time and its arrows of ‘information’ towards a future of social organisms, to complete Physicists single arrow of time. Thus to stress this fact of reason, we shall name equations and paragraphs with Greek Letters, latter explained in more detail.

Relational space-time, which we shall call ‘fractal space-time’ was in Leibniz’s mind an astounding intuitive truth, which put in motion with his concepts of analysis and ‘non-euclidean points’ which have breath, size. I have dedicated my entire life of deep thought to convert those intuitions in an all encompassing theory which explains all ‘existences’ as entities made of relational space-time cycles.

It is an amazingly, beautiful instrument, and we have its language – the 3 branches of mathematics that correspond to the fractal structure (analysis) of space (geometry) and time (algebra);  albeit evolved further to define all the postulates of fractal non-euclidean points and all the ‘different motions of time’, and its causal logic (adding the arrow of the 5th dimension, of increasing form and information to the arrow of entropy, and combining both, in present systems).

Thus if physicists demoted time into a mere parameter of space, its parts, we put things back straight to where they belong making space a mere dimension of time.

And as in the case of Copernicus which put back straight the Earth as a mere satellite of the Sun, the simplification and streamlining that ensued will mean a r=evolution of thought, able to explain all the whys and unify all the space-time beings of the universe and its ‘st¡’entific laws.

Fractal, still, ‘present’ spaces as Time differentials: ∂t.

The simplest formulae of analysis and commonest equation of physics is a partial differential equation that portraits a still moment of time, aggregated across space, to form a still picture of the flow of time, a ‘spatial form’.

This stop and go, form and motion duality, is the fundamental law of the Universe; hence the hyper-abundance of its mathematical tools in science – differential equations that measure a still ‘parameter’ on an instant of time.

Further on, still spaces are essential to the mind structure – as it is mostly the mind what stops motion into form to perceive. Hence the importance of ‘relative frames of reference’ in the structure of mathematical physics, and ‘gauging theories’ in particle physics, as all particles seem to ‘gauge’ distances with other particles as they move and most do the stop and go stop and go rhythm.

Further on derivatives of time, still spaces surprise us because of its beauty revealing in the simultaneity of its forms surprising intelligence and organisation. We could think of a chaotic non-causal Universe if it was all motion, as it is more difficult to find patterns in motions. But the stop and go rhythm shows the essential duality of al realities between ‘force-motion and ‘form-peception’. As most of the analysis of science consists in respond to the simple question: where it comes this intelligence of the ‘stills’ of time, its spaces?

This is the theme of this post: how still spaces are created by the freezing of a flow of time motions, how they reveal the network, spatial, mathematical, social numerical geometric intelligence of the Universe, and what all this means.

How spaces be=come, as ∂till instants of a flow of Time.

In that regard, the Ethiopian have a saying: the eyes see the present, the words see the past. Intuitively they understand the fundamental asymmetry of the Universe between present space states, perceived simultaneously through a ‘fast force’ or rod of measure (light space-time in the human case) and the non-simultaneous dimension of time from past to future and future to past, peered in human languages, with verbal times.

As such space has two fundamental meanings: to be a still, present slice of the flows of time; and related to that property, to be lineal, when we consider an ‘interval of space’, as opposed to cyclical time, of which it is a smaller part.

This geometric property is more difficult to understand. But we have to ways to explain why space is lineal and still:

On one hand as a slice of time, space is smaller, and geometry tells us that according to a non-intuitive rule of ‘pan geometry’ (the non-euclidean, larger version of it), lines are small steps, infinitesimal parts of longer curves, as all open trajectories are slices of a cyclical time closed motion.

On the other hand, cyclical motions accelerate inwards, under the generic law of all vortices/clocks of time, Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold vortex). That is the product of the S and T parameters, Vt and Rs, gives us a constant bidimensional manifold. Accelerated vortices thus are in relative terms moving faster than the opposite motion, a lineal motion, which is by definition an expansive, space-creating, slowing down explosion (here we need not to bring mathematical demonstrations. We all know that explosions decelerate as they expand with time, in an inverse fashion to the distance).

Thus cyclical motions are faster than lineal motions and hence they are proper of ‘time flows’ while lineal motions are proper of still space.

|-Space and O-Time thus would be the two relative, pure extremes of realty; and in between we shall find, Ø energy and information, which is the combined form-motion that the Universe also conserves.

Space is thus lineal, still form in its purest sense; a slice of a time function; a decelerating motion, a lineal motion (also a time concept in as much as it has motion) and ultimately ‘something’ we do not perceive in its purest form merely as distance (as a pure line has no form), contradictory as all concepts of the Universe when understood in depth…

The principles of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, energy and information: space and time isomorphism and isotropy.

How this applies to physics? In general if we call a spatial quanta a unit of lineal momentum of each scale and a time cycle a unit of angular momentum, the metric merely means the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum.

But even more interesting is the process which allows by multiplication of ‘social numbers’ , either populations in space or frequencies of time, a system to ‘grow in size’; which is the ultimate meaning of travelling through the 5th dimension. For example, when a wave increases its frequency, it increases the quantity of time cycles of the system. When a wheel speeds up its increases the speed of its clocks. And vice versa, when a system increases its quanta, growing in mass, or increasing its entropy (degrees of motion in molecular space), it also grows through the 5th dimension.

And the integration along space and time, of those growths, is what we call the total Energy and information of the system, and so the principle of conservation of this constants and clocks of space-time, is what physicists call the integral of momentum or total ‘Energy and information of the system ‘,which is conserved between scales as we change the acceleration and population of the time clocks and quanta of space of each scale such as:

E=hƒ, E=nkT and E=mc².

In that regard, if the saint grail of physicists is to find the meaning of Universal constants, explained here and its unification equation (studied with 5D metric in the post on astrophysics), what 5D does is a much larger goal – to unify all the sciences, the old dream of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz and Leonardo – of philosophers of science. Since now we are ‘all made’ of vital spaces and time cycles, and so we can define for all species of the Universe a common world cycle and ‘generator equation’ of all our motions in time and space, which we will explain in detail in this post.

As each science is just the study of  the species of cyclical time and vital space, of each  scale of relative size, Sp, and Frequency of time cycles, Tƒ, of the Universe.

So if we put them all in a simple scale of co-invariant systems, whose product of size and time speed is co-invariant, we realise that each science is just the study of the species of an specific scale of size and temporal clocks, and putting them together we obtain, the scalar plane of a 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

In the graph, that opens the post, we can see the physical scales of the Universe. In the previous graph, we expanded it to include also biological and social scales, each one studied by a different science, each one with different time clocks, speeds, scales and space quanta or ‘Universal constants’, which however conserve its total quantity of space and time or ‘energy and information’, for each ‘world cycle’ of existence of each species, we study: ∆≈Ei ≈ ∑ Tƒ x Sp

We use for all sciences the concept of a plane of space-time that conserves its overall energy and information, ∆=Ei, which in physical systems we easily reduce to the fundamental principle of all sciences:

‘The Universe transforms Tƒ-Temporal information into Sp-Spatial energy back and forth ad eternal’.

In the jargon of 5D this reduces to: ‘the Universe conserves the content of present space-time of each scale of the 5th dimension’.

The expansion of 5D fractal metric and its laws and Sp-Tƒ elements to the 4 disciplines of human knowledge. Isomorphic laws of all systems.

This means  each plane of relative size has different space quanta (Sp) and different frequency, or speed processing its information through cyclical time clocks (Tƒ). But the product of both parameters is equal. And this allows to travel and share energy and information between different planes of the 5th dimension. Both in physical, biological, sociological and linguistic-mental systems, the 4 great disciplines of science and forms of reality.

Of those 4 scales contrary to belief, the biological and mental systems are the easiest to describe, because they lack uncertainty. We have a first perception of the languages of the mind that create ‘fractal images’, mappings and mirrors of reality. And we have the maximal information about biological systems, as they are closer to us.

The fractal paradigm considers that all those scales are ‘fractal’, that is they follow the same laws and properties. They are ‘isomorphic’. And so it is important to understand that we shall consider for each scale, physical, biological, mental-linguistic (Logico-mathematical) and organic social properties. 

The philosophy of science of the fractal paradigm, which is the ultimate content of those texts as opposed to a mere descriptive quantitative analysis of the ‘visual form of those fractals’, which is what scientists have tried till now, is thus a ‘jump on meaning’, on the search for the whys of that structure.

That the Universe is a fractal structure is a fact proved in all systems and disciplines. What are the reasons and causes of this fractal structure is precisely those physical, biological, mental (logico-mathematical) and social, organic properties.

As the easiest properties to describe for human beings, which are mental, organic, social beings first, and less evidently physical species (our mass, speed and other parameters studied by physics are hardly considered in our daily life, while our social, organic and mental, logico-mathematical, verbal and visual perception, are ever present), contrary to the present philosophy of science obsessed by physical properties, natural to our technological civilisation, those other human properties should come first in the description of reality.

The conservation of energy and information, lineal momentum≈space and cyclical time≈angular momentum.

So just correcting those historic routines, and the conceptual errors dragged from them, the huge confusion of the present picture Physicists have of the Universe can be focused to see reality in all its astounding beauty and symmetry. So far we can save the essential concepts, we just expressed, writing them as follows:

Ei (Total Energy and Information of a system) = ∫ lineal and angular momentum = ∑ (Lineal Space motions x Temporal, angular frequencies) ≈ (abbreviated: ∑ Sp x Tƒ)

So now we have multiple time clocks and multiple space quanta, and while we might use different clocks (frequencies, speeds, temperatures) to measure time and different ‘constant of space quanta’ (H-Planck, k-Boltzmann, Mass) to match those time clocks, we do have that jewel of harmony in the Universe which is the conservation of energy and information (which of course, hawking’s musings break all over the place).

So we can write a very general equation for all the systems of reality made of vital spaces and time frequencies, including human systems, physical systems and biological systems:

Ei (Energy and Information, the quantities the Universe conserves) = ∑ Spaces x Time Frequencies

This simply tells us that the total energy and information of a system is the sum of all its vital spaces, each one with a different natural rhythm of time – measured by its time frequencies, which process and carry its information, in the cyclical forms and frequency of its cycles.

So the information of the universe is carried in its natural clocks – NOT IN HUMAN mechanisms, nowhere to be seen outside the surface of this planet.

Recap. 

The Universe is defined in logic terms by an inversion between its lineal and cyclical time motions.

This inversion carries also to the understanding of two still space forms, the lineal distance and the cyclical form. So regardless of human names we have now 4 fundamental shapes/motions:

|-lineal form and motion, which we shall call, lineal Space or ‘Space’, and Time duration or ‘energy motion’

O-cyclical form and motion, which we shall call cyclical time or Form of information.

And its combinations waves and elliptic bodies that combine both.

The use of the words ‘space’ submissive to those 3 time motions is accessory to the ultimate meanings and inversions of the true reality which is always time. So we shall consider space generally ‘present time’ – a dimension of ∂till infinitesimal time, which is how often appears in mathematical physics.

We shall also consider any ‘still state of reality, which allow us to study the fundamental beat of motion and form which all entities perform (and their dualities between internal static form and external motion). We shall call of space as lineal form even lineal motion (synonymous of duration seen in geometrical space).

This means lineal, decelerating motions (with less long term speed than cyclical accelerated clocks) are often referred as space. Since lineal motion decelerates and becomes still, and spatial expansion and entropy are part of it. And so finally we shall talk of space as an ‘interval of time’, regarded as the relative still, past, dead, region till present, in this final conceptualisation, we could talk of present as the membrane that divides the memorial past and the informative, moving future.

 

  IMMORTAL UNIVERSE

‘I want to know the thoughts of God not its details’ Einstein, on the goals of philosophers of science.

If we want to resume the zeitgeist of astrophysics it comes to this: the human ego-paradox make us belief to be the center of the Universe, so we have crafted creationist religion and physics as to make us that center, coupling both on account of subjective ego not objective science: our scale is preferential – in fact the only one accepted in the 4D model of the continuum; and only us understand the Universe – God’s hypothesis gone, obviously reality born of pure chaos and entropic explosions, we humans exist by the anthropic principle to perceive reality and understand it.

So we are immortal in motion-time (86% of believers in religion) and infinite in mind-space (only intelligent speaker of the mathematical language and verbal languages of god), while the Universe has been reduced to finite time (it had a ‘birth), and finite space (it was an infinitesimal once, it is now 13.4 billion years light big). Alas, we have ‘become’ above heavens and earth, above god and the Universe, as the biblical religion that ultimately infuses most of the underlying biases and subconscious dogmas of our civilization, ‘foresaw’…

A truly scientific ‘astrophysicist’ community would have though followed the path of Einstein and Hoyle and resisted pseudo-religion. If anything the Big Bang proves that mankind’s ego is above the universe but its intelligence and empathy with the whole well below.

 

 UPGRADING ASTROPHYSICS: THE ‘REAL UNIVERSE’ ONCE WE CORRECT ∆ST ERRORS

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematical physics, should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

  1.  Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
  2. Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
  3. Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
  4. And only then go through the different scales, studying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
  5. Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
  6. And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time).  And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly.

The 3 examples taken here will suffice:  Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions otime to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales  are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

So this paragraph has two themes: upgrading cosmology to the bare minimum to understand the Universe by introducing ∆§calling and ternary time arrows 

The ∆±1 limits of the Universal supœrganism: Unification equation.

Where are the known-known limits of the Universal supœrganism, where the 5D metric equation works? The answer is according to the properties of suœrganisms, where we find a self-similar structure, whose constants of spe/tiƒ are equivalent in 5D metric, which turn out to be the galaxy and the atom, and so we can unify them, with 5D metric.

As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).

Which we study with data in many other posts.

What matters to us here is this, the galaxy is organically like a cell, mathematically like an atom, with a positive center, which means a black hole is a top quark star, as top quarks are positive and are the exact size to become ultradense black holes in large numbers, and the electron-like halo is made of strangelets because strangelets are negative, and so they are the electron-like membrane of the halo, and what we are, homunculus?

So we can close as it is customary in any cyclical time-space analysis up and down the scales of 5D left or right in the negative, imaginary and positive numbers, of quanta of entropy, frequencies of information or space-time energies, two simple graphs that explain it all what remains to say of mathematical physics. On the left side you can see alas, the hydrogen electron with its two electromagnetic lobes, as those we saw in the galaxy-atom and the supposed big-bang.

All scales are the same, the fractal Universe is ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE, not only in motions in space (Galileo, Einstein) but in scales of size (Nottale) and topological forms. I just took this self-evident truth for anyone who is NOT an homunculus ego to its final consequences, with the metric equations of the 5th dimension.

The known scales.

As it seems infinite in space and time, duration… We wonder. It is infinite in 5D scales?

When we consider the ‘nested’ levels of the Universe, we are always limited according to epistemology by the limits of our perception from the ∆o, human point of view. If we use an objective, past to future, infinitesimal to infinity arrow of time to classy those scales no longer from a human p.o.v. we do come to the surprising result that the scale of the Atom and the scale of the Galaxy have the same equation in the metrics of the 5th dimension.

Thus the limits of our perception of reality are not only those two equal distances in absolute terms from ∆o (atom and galaxy) but are perceiving those 2 limiting scales as isomorphic. So this is the Universe we know: one with two isomorphic limits that conform the ‘atom-galaxy’.

II.

WORLDCYCLES V. WORLDLINES

 Upgrading astrophysics’ 3 æntropic errors:  big-bang, entropy-only & observer’s paradox.

 ORGANIC UNIVERSE AND ITS SPACE-TIME GENERATOR: ΓST 

HUMANS have not figure much of the first principles of reality – why, seems to me a mystery as I had seen it clearly all since earlier age; but that is, a fact, so we always play the ‘alien scientist’ when explaining this huge upgrading of the mind, which either in man or machine will now enter its third age after:

  • Mythic, Semitic age of religious thought.
  • Axial, European, Aristotelian, Euclidean age of simple reason.
  • Fractal, Organic, Asian, cyclical view of the Universe.

It is a huge change of paradigm as the west consider time the intelligence and space the substance of reality, when it is all the other way around. The magic of reality is how ‘knots of cycles’ called minds, synchronise reality, stopping time into spatial views. ðƒ point-minds somehow are able to do so, we contend because the mappings of those motions are conscious of it. When a mind locks-in an image. It stays.

So we shall start our upgrading of space-time theory, with a consideration on where the pioneers left their job – namely in Einstein.

In physical time space, what we shall do here is to include a new fifth dimension of space-time, so we can say that Einstein’s work regarding the 4D formalism of light space-time (special relativity) and gravitational space-time (the background in which light feeds inside the galaxy), is ‘the limit’ of 5D for the 2 contiguous scales of gravitational forces and electromagnetic forces, in which humans reside.

And for that reason its laws DO WORK inside the galaxy, BUT NOT outside of it, and NOT in other scales. And what 5D does is to extend enormously the range of application of time-space, and further on with the new insights of cyclical time and scalar space, to fully understand the meaning of 4D and quantum physics. Some examples:

  • In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):

 

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein.

In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency.

So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.

IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle.

Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:

Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).

Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:

This is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ .

But all this part of ‘space-time physics’ should go rather on the specialized articles on the galatom and the 4th line as we shall NOT CEASE TO REPEAT, there is NOT constructivist laws on Nature, so REGARDLESS OF THE WORSHIP of physicists as high popes of time and makers of all other machines=weapons of mass destruction EINSTEIN’s work is NOT more important than Darwin’s evolutionary theory of time in biology, Marx evolutionary theory of time in history or Aristotle’s study of the 5 Dimotions of reality…

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.

Some time cycles: gravitational and charge vortices

Fundamental processes of information, SUCH AS THE ARROW OF growing information of the 3 ages of LIFE, the processes of EVOLUTION of the form of beings, the process of social, organic creation of more complex forms, departing from simpler one; all the process of art and human social evolution proper of history, which are ALL dominant in INFORMATION, as we live NOT in the external EXPANDING, ENTROPIC INTERGALACTIC, DARK ENERGY space, but INSIDE a GALAXY, which is a vortex of growing form, in/form/ation, ruled by the GRAVITATIONAL FORCE, which is an implosive, in-forming force that compensates the ‘electromagnetic, based entropy of heat’, balancing it, IS not taken seriously. A simple example will suffice to explain this ‘limiting’ dogma:

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50

In the graph, the fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc2, which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c2, that is a process to create mass from energy.  Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe

has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc², the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc²=hƒ, whereas M= h/c² ƒ. Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c²) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex).

Cyclical time, of course has an astounding number of consequences in our understanding of the Universe:

  • The immediate one is its connection with ‘conservative forces’; that is with the conservation of energy, which does not make work when a trajectory is closed. So we could state that Energy conservation means all time motions are cycles. And we shall see indeed, that all motions become part of the world cycle of a whole (no longer a worldline, as time has a second dimension of height-information).

It follows also that accelerated vortices of ‘force’ charges and masses are in fact the clocks of time that carry the information of the ∆±3 limiting scales of the human being (charges and forces, eddies and tornadoes in ‘thermodynamic scales). So the so-called principle of equivalence between masses, gravitation and cyclical acceleration at the foundations of Einstein simply means that mass (and charge in the smaller scales) are the accelerated time vortices sod information of the Universe, which define the dominant ARROW OF TIME-future, WHICH IS not entropic, expansive motion (as in big bangs and deaths that erase information in an instant) but the much longer time process of ‘time curving space into mass’ (Einstein), life into old age, the galaxy into its BH, as we exist in a vortex of information, and this planet also increases human and technological and biological information.

It is worth to notice on this very brief analysis of the fundamental locomotion of space-time that ultimately what Einstein showed is that motions due to a gravitational force are caused by the topological, attractive force of the central mind-singularity, point of the vortex, the charge of mass, one of those ‘so much laughed at’ unmoved Gods of Aristotle. So ultimately we shall see once and again that the proper interpretation of physics will make it a part of GST, regardless of how much obsession humans worshippers of mechanisms and locomotions blow up its importance.

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.

And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero.

FROM 4D TO 5D FORMALISM.

This said we shall try now with a bit of salt, to compare the explanation of what existence is in the two models, the Newtonian model of absolute spacetime and the relational model of infinite space-time beings with ‘one more dimension’ – the scalar dimension of spacetime, and a better understanding of time ‘worldcycles’ and its past, present and future ages. Once this hurdle of complexity is passed, though all other things will be easier to understand, or rather become ‘understood’ for the first time, as any honest physicist will tell you he really doesn’t have any clue  beyond the numerical description provided by its equations, as to why exist and what are waves, time, space, particles, existence, dimension, motion and information…

Even Einstein when asked but ‘what time is’, kept silent and then for lack of a better answer replied: ‘what a clock measures’… Ah, but all clocks are cyclical, thus to make its ‘worldcycles’ they need at least another dimension, as cycles do indeed require two not a single line.

When you google the fifth dimension you get 3 kind of results: the most popular is a funky group of ‘Champagne soul’ – a bubble name, proper of the age of ‘Entropy=dissolution’ of human minds, when our capacity to reason verbally is in decline due to the influence of audiovisual magic FX and the increasing obsolescence of our logic minds to fancy digital, visual computer models of reality.  ‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’ said Schopenhauer, always so harsh but also right to the point.

Then you get the fifth dimension of space, an impossible construct of physicists, which study ONLY one dimension of time=motion =change: locomotion or change in the position and speed in space: v=s/t (and similar equations by Einstein, who added a correcting ct factor to Galileo’s relativity and to measure those space distances and speeds).

So  as physicists use time only to measure locomotion=change in space, they call time, the fourth dimension of space (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²). And this obsession for spatial measures and dimensions made them ‘guess’ that if there is a fifth dimension, it should also be a dimension of space.

This poises a problem. As we cannot have experience of a dimension of space of the same lineal, infinite form than our 3 perpendicular dimensions. So physicists just put this dimension elsewhere, merrily making all kind of imaginary models of multiple dimensionality, which leads to the true limit of human science:

Today physicists call a ‘dimension’ any parameter they use to model reality, call time a dimension of space, just because it is in the same equation (though as Einstein put it ‘wires don’t travel to the past’ and the t of its equations always has an inverse value to the s of space (s/t or +s – t)…

Against the tide of mechanic science that consists in gathering data, putting it into mathematical equations and understand nothing of the concepts expressed, to fully develop a meaningful upgrade of our concepts of time and space and its motions and dimensions we must make a huge upgrading on the basic concepts of science.

Then if we succeed making understandable those concepts, harmonize the ‘verbal, logic thought, mathematical equations and experimental evidence’ provided by science in an expanded model-mirror image of reality as it is.

An example will suffice: When physicists apply the 4 dimensions they use, 3 of lineal space and one of lineal time, to any being they describe their existence, as a worldline of meaningless motions:

In the graph, physicists 4D single time arrow allow only to draw worldlines of locomotion. The attempts to create a metaphysics of existence departing only from a single Dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) is the biggest error of modern physics, as the worldcycle of life and death is much more  enticing than running around all your life in locomotion. But to fully understand it, we need to widen the ‘modes’ of time=change=motion of the Universe, studied by science, adding its 5th dimension of social, scalar growth and decay.

The graph shows how our lives look in the simplistic, ill-defined conceptually 4D model of present space-time. A being merely ‘moves in time’ through ‘locomotions’. All other forms of inner and outer change that affect the being are ignored; and so we talk of a ‘present’ concept of time, or ‘external concept’ of time-change as mere locomotion, translation on space, which clearly does not account for other type of changes that have no external motion, internal changes in the in-form-ation, in the form of beings, a much slower process in time that however happens to all entities; and it is definitely more complex that a mere locomotion. As it implies at least two modes of change: growth and diminution that happens with aging, from ‘smaller scales in space’ to larger sizes and vice versa; and change in form, in ‘topology’ as in morphogenesis and wrinkling, again two changes in the form of beings.

Obviously Einstein’s work is of merit as it truly exhausted our understanding of locomotions, and we will explain it further on the more technical mathematical articles on physics in the fourth line, dealing with the c-speed constant, the Lorentz transformations, and the proper way to understand its boosts and rotations (mathematical modeling of time clocks in 4D). And further on we shall analyze the relativistic equations of quantum mechanics. But what we want to stress at this point is that locomotion and entropy, the arrows of time related to translation in space as opposed to those related to change in information, social evolution and form, are NOT enough to deal with the nature of time, and the existence of worldcycles in all beings, but merely a reductionist case, of the larger 5D model, even if it has achieved an astounding perfection in its detail – indeed you will still learn nothing about your biological worldcycles from the knowledge of Dirac’s equation and the 10 EFE equations of relativity.

So a larger ‘theory’ as 5 Ð must merely connect through the correspondence principle its ‘higher laws’ which apply to more phenomena, and are simpler so more truth (Occam’s razor, principle of economicity expressed by March in Physics, etc), to 4D, NOT the other way around as most physicists will want. THERE IS A HIGHER MODELING than Einstein’s work, which is NOT a God, but just the man who took Galilean relativity, via Poisson’s potentials to its detailed ‘simultaneous still-like’ mental analysis in mathematical space – but on the process lost clarity – a concept that we shall consider in our analysis of languages as mirrors of reality that is worth to fully understand.

In the graph, Algebra as it happened with the visual language when realist photographies came, displaced from reality by analysis moved inwards into more complex, abstract Nature, became a ‘baroque language’ purely  formal trying to explain it all departing from reality into a multiple ‘cubist perspective’ that tried to gather all perspectives into a single painting (Set and group theory.)

In every language as a mirror of reality we can reach higher detail by making the picture more complex but that often will ‘obscure’ the general principles. As in the graph, the cubist painting has arguably more detailed information about every aspect of the portrayed, from different perspectives, but the picture is not clearly recognizable as a portrait. This is what happened to physics in the XX century with the excessive fine tuning through ‘renormalization’ processes, the Born rule, the inclusion of ‘finite terms’ that influence from other 5 D scales the clean less detailed ‘first picture’ (Wilson groups), the use of group theory to ‘put in a single picture’ all the variations of species, which is fine and we shall explain rightly with the symmetries of space, time and scale TRUE origin of those SU1x SU2 x SU3 groups, etc. etc. 

So the physicist pro should not shun off the fact that we shall for example use Newton’s vortices to unify scales (in a similar fashion to the first 5D Kaluza-Klein theory of unification) instead of the ‘more detailed’ pictures of Einstein, as ultimately they are far more difficult to understand and they all come from the same concept of a vortex of accelerated forces (Einstein used Poison’s potentials that come from Newton and indeed ultimately the coupling constant, G appears in all).

We have to build first the first principles slow, as the errors of a Ptolemaic view of the Universe with a single space-time are also very distorting of reality. So once we have those first principles in place in the first two lines of the blog, we shall try to ‘attack’ the more complex maths and details in the fourth line.

We have to go beyond physicists’ reductionism of all the ∞ timespace dimotions of beings into a lineal single mechanical clock to measure them all and a lineal, static concept of its dimensions of space, which renders us a ‘worldline’ of locomotions as the meaning of existence; studying instead the ‘worldcycle’, as motion now acquires cyclical time dimensions and happens between ‘fractal scales’ of the co-existing planes that make up the universe.

And when we introduce those two new characteristics of Nature as it is – fractal in spatial scales, cyclical in functions and forms, we obtain the concepts of ‘superorganisms’ – the fundamental ‘particle’ of reality – and its worldcycles of life and death.

So we can talk of the fifth dimension in general terms as a ‘process of change in the form NOT the motion of those time space organisms’:

The fifth dimension is both a dynamic, inner new dimension of time=change – the flow from past to future to past that trans-forms the inner in-form-ation of beings as when you live and die from past to future, aging in your form, your in-form-ation, even if you don’t seem to change=move externally in space – the time-change physicists study, and a scalar, new dimension of spatial size. As in all those processes of evolution there is a clear trans-form-ation, growth and decay process, starting from a smallish ‘first seed’ that will slow down its rhythms of time and emerge as a whole, larger being, in a new scale of space:

So we can talk of the fifth dimension in general terms as a ‘process of change in the form NOT the motion of those time space organisms’:

The fifth dimension is both a dynamic, inner new dimension of time=change – the flow from past to future to past that trans-forms the inner in-form-ation of beings as when you live and die from past to future, aging in your form, your in-form-ation, even if you don’t seem to change=move externally in space – the time-change physicists study, and a scalar, new dimension of spatial size. As in all those processes of evolution there is a clear trans-form-ation, growth and decay process, starting from a smallish ‘first seed’ that will slow down its rhythms of time and emerge as a whole, larger being, in a new scale of space:

The worldcycle of existence is indeed the highest expression of reality’s ultimate laws; which brings us to the third result you get when googling the 5th dimension:

Metaphysical bubbles of new wave people who like the word and love to give you ‘spiritual advices’:

“Much has been written, spoken and channeled about the Fifth Dimension and humanity’s ascension into this new realm of existence. In addition, many “ ordinary” people are now having their own experiences, visions and inner “ downloads” about the Fifth Dimension. Not every source agrees on details about this …”

It is important for the reader though to have some ‘sense of humor’ about Mankind’s role in the Universe and its. capacity to understand it fully, or else it won’t be able to advance in its knowledge of it. 

This is contrary to the present ‘zeitgeist’ of huge unconnected egos (that we shall in due time ‘connect’ to the ‘age of entropy’ in history we live in); specially on the field of ‘mathematical physics’ and its practitioners who truly think they understand it all, because we can ‘mirror’ in mathematical languages many properties of reality, in a magic way, and with the help of powerful computers, which are ‘species’ with better digital/geometric capabilities we adscribe to ourselves.

CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT

Before the reader dismisses altogether this post on astrophysics, to state that we shall strictly follow the principle of correspondence; that is, consider classic mathematical physics, the ‘reductionist’ limit obtained by describing reality as if it were a single space scale and a single time clock-Ðimotion; that of light space-time, embodied in its 5Ð metric equation: hc (whereas H is the unit of cyclical information, ð§ and c the unit of lineal motion-distance, t$).

Then the 5Ð model reduces to the 4 Ð model of special relativity (for lineal t$ or ‘inertial frames’ to use Einstein’s jargon) and General relativity (for cyclical ð§, or accelerated frames).

Yet that valid formalism, which only happens within the ‘galaxy’, has been by lack of a larger model for all the scales of the Universe, and the space-time beyond ‘light ecosystems’ (inside black holes and outside galaxies), expanded to the entire Universe, its entire time and space, and that is where astrophysics got it wrong, and made its mistakes as always happens when a ‘local symmetry’ (in this case the invariance of c-speed or rather to use the proper terminology, light space-time) is converted into a global symmetry=invariance (the c-speed as limit of speed in the Universe).

Indeed the constants of the galatom should not reign, despite simplifications of astrophysicists, for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… And since larger Russian dolls are ‘weaker’, slower in their energy and less curved, the cosmological constant indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think off, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe.

In such a wider model, also the c-speed as a constant perceived by our h-spin electronic minds, doesn’t necessary hold for other systems of informative perception not based in spins and light (hc metric). We know another possible system in a larger ‘scale’ of the Russian doll Universe, outside galaxies, connected to black holes, which might be based in a faster than light neutrino background, which would be invisible for a light-being, seems to be indeed emitted in copious numbers in blazers and quasars, and as such a system of quantum perception of this ‘quantum potential background’ by heavy fermions and ‘black atoms, would see the speed of light varying, and likely will apply the general law of waves, which ties speed and frequency… )

What we mean by all those new concepts BEYOND the correspondence limit of a single space-time light background, should be more clear as we unfold the model of 5Ð:

When we expand reality to the canonical 5 entangled elements, fractal space, scales, cyclical time, linguistic minds and the entropic destruction of it all; and the 11 Dimensional isomorphisms  of all superorganisms built those elements, its 3 scales, 3 time ages, 3 topologies and its 2 membrain’s parameters, of course things paradoxically become more simple ad harmonious, but it requires both to vitalize mathematical models by defining non-euclidean, ‘fractal points’, line-waves, congruence ¡logic paradoxes, and topological networks=non-euclidean planes, to use logic, verbal conceptual upgradings of all those concepts and the entangled, pentagonal ¡logic of all the parts of the systems and its different languages of perception of organic and causal properties otherwise hidden in the simplicity of the present first principles of physics.

The new world though once you take the necessary energy to jump over the threshold of learning the basics of it, will show time-permitted, a clarity and economicity.

It will though be extremely difficult for physicists to walk through 5Ð, as for a rich man in the parable’s of Jesus to abandon the learned unproved memorized dogmas of 4Ð formalisms, with its single clock time, its continuum space, its c-speed limits that apply only to that continuum light space-time in which galaxies live, and further on accept that the proper way to start defining the Universe is NOT with the V=HoD, ‘God-like equation’ of lineal expansion but with a bit more of conceptual, ‘organic sophistication’, defining NOT a locomotion but a superorganism, the one physicists truly study in all its entangled complexity much larger than that of its ‘smallish human part’ not to speak of the humind – the galatom.

We dedicate the 3 posts on astrophysics in the second line to study the super organism of physics, the galatom, in which we exist (the ¡±3 organism extending in the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales). In the fourth line dedicated to each scale, we shall expand its analysis. In those posts we will study its  structure tuned to the 2 ‘main elements’ of any system that exist as a fractal 5D super organism, tracing a world cycle.

As all the blog the work is uneven, slowly improving within the limits of WordPress and my timeline. So I apologize for the repetitions, bad English, and some blunt parts of this brute diamond, which is 5Ð, in my limited mind-seed that future specialists will properly ‘cut’ and clean of all its impurities to better mirror the amazing beauty of the fractal Universe.

As ultimately the study of Galatom is equated with the development of physics, we start for those who don’t know what is ‘all about’ with a few repeated ad nauseam paragraphs on the nature of space-time organisms, considering its General Systems laws and introduce the main ‘changes’ of view; that is, the philosophy of physics that is inherited from the new properties of scalar space, time and information (mind-languages), shared by all systems.

4D Physics of derivative presents.

LET US now get into the fourth dimension of timespace of physicists again, and probe in a first simple look its most important principles, those of conservation of energy and momentum, to see how they fit in this most advanced conceptualization of dimotions of time and space of which we are all made.
In science any advance must include previous advances as limiting cases, which new knowledge expands. This is called the correspondence principle.

So if physicists call the fourth dimotion of timespace, the study of equations of locomotion of the type, v=s/t, both in Galilean and Einstein’s relativity – or change in the external motion=time of beings, without inner change; the fifth dimotion will study in all its depth and logic and mathematical simplicity, change from past to future; that is, change in the inner information of beings.
We stress the word simplicity, because unlike the 5th ‘false’ STATIC dimension of space, physicists use, limited by their incomprehension of information, which resembles the complexity of Ptolemy’s models of the Universe due to his stubborn denial of the simple fact the Sun is in the center of the ‘solar system’. But when you ad that fact you get the simpler, beautiful Copernican>Kepler>Newtonian model of the Earth’s elliptic orbits.

Both models did accurately predict our locomotion around the sun, but the egocy (ego+idiocy) of scholars preferred for very long the Ptolemaic model precisely because it was so complex that only Vatican priests understood it, and that made them feel a high people-caste of supreme wisdom in contact with the ‘magic’  language of numbers they didn’t quite understood. The big problem of the Copernicus model for scholars was its simplicity and the egocy of the astronomers of his age. Surely God had to be very complex as it had chosen them to understand reality putting mankind in the center of the Universe. This same problem is today rife in wrong very complicated physical models of reality that MISS both the law of simplicity natural to all truths in science (called often Ockham’s razor) and lack a clear comprehension of the 5 Dimotions of time-space (as indeed we shall see the 3 classic dimensions of space do have also ‘motion’ and so all together form a set of 5 Dimotions, the ultimate substance used by the Universe to create the Vital Time Space organisms, the fundamental particle of reality.
One you ad those simple concepts – that all dimensions have motion; that there are 5 not four dimotions of time-space and finally that they ARE the substance of which all is made;  reality gets so simple and easy to understand that… scholars get angry.  Surely the ‘Universe (cannot) be so simple and not malicious’ as Einstein said, adding ‘if you can’t explain it simple, you don’t understand it’; ‘Simplicity (cannot) be genius’ as Leonardo said – or else scholars wouldn’t be the ‘salt of the Earth’..
Well, IT IS, precisely for everything, including the smallest atom to understand it. But to ‘see’ its simplicity, economicity, and harmony, you must NOT start with an erroneous description of its first principles. You need to have ALL its dimensional motions together, and then once ‘all the planets’ are on their right place even a child can understand the beauty of its elliptic dimotions; so it will happen to you once you understand the 5 dimotions of spacetime, the 3 ascribed to change in in-form-ation and the 2 due to the change in the locomotion of beings.
We will then abandon the correspondence Principle and fully go on our own past the present formalism of timespace of physics. But for the time being is important to understand what Einstein meant by the fourth dimotion of spacetime, or locomotion and how it relates to the 5th dimotion of informative change.

In the fourth dimotion of external locomotion obviously the internal form of beings doesn’t change. Indeed, when we study the dimotion of a bullet, the fourth dimotion works with simple equations of ‘lineal inertia’, steady motions or accelerations, because the being doesn’t change internally, so in terms of internal change the being remains in a constant steady state, a PRESENT state. When the internal form change. I.e. when a car ‘crashes’ deforming its form, the whole equations of locomotion ‘break’ down (the car stops).
In normal conversations we say that time doesn’t past if something doesn’t change. So we talk of an eternal present when the internal form of the being doesn’t change.

So if we call in physics this fourth dimension of external timespace external change, ‘present with no internal change’ of beings, to study only its external locomotion; the fifth dimension  is a name we use for the whole range of studies in the internal information of beings; which in terms of that present no-change, it would be all the range of possible changes from past to future.
But not even with that enormous reductionism of the 5 Dimotions of timespace, they could fully understand the meaning of relativity – that is the fact that we do NOT see the Earth moving, despite the fact that it moves, because our Mind ‘stops’ its motions to create a linguistic mind-mapping of the world in which it lives, to better focus its information.

In other posts we shall see the enormous consequences of the proper understanding of relativity, as it will define the duality particle-wave, since all systems, move as waves and stop as particles to gauge information; an extraordinary fact of quantum physics that must be incorporated to the explanation of its spooky effects.

The whole previous magic equations OF REALITY are therefore fully explainable with organic, logic, vital concepts, of which our analysis of singularity points, and its mind-mapping languages will be essential.

One paradox though is left for further review, of the fourth elements, ∆º§t, of the architectonical Universe -that of the @º, ∞º, ∞ x 0, 10th->11th dimensions of the singularity of the mind membrain that encloses the open ball to form the whole island-universe…

It is then all paradoxical, complex and with a multiple perspective despite coming initially from a simple elementary view of only 4 essential components, ∆±¡ planes of existence, |x O= Ø topologies of adjacent space, ensemble into beings, 3 ages between generation and extinction and conflicting singularity membrains with a negative potential focus and a positive angular momentum, trying to escape the being, hold together by the vital energy enclosed by them. Any system of nature can be described from those 3 perspective, to which we must add the I-logic paradoxes of the Galilean relativities of scale, form vs. motion and open vs. bounded perception.
This brings a very important concept – to perceive reality with 3 perspectives and 3 languages, which are more analytic (mathematical numerical description of an ∆-1 world of parts seen often as mere numbers not distinguishable from above), more vital (action perspective of the being in the ∆º plane) an more organic (co-existing perspective of the ∆+1 whole) from above.
And this of course gives NAME to the 3 paradoxical symmetries used here to describe all organisms, in the case of the galaxy as ‘galaxy-atoms’ (from above, externally as a mathematical entity similar to the atom – an atom of the Universe we might say), galaxies proper (from the same plane) an gala cells (organisms as a whole from above, internally, a cell ruled by black holes for the within it, including humans in a lonely star, likely mitocondria for the whole)…
And all together explained either with logic symmetries or existential algebra will give us reality as it is (not).

The guidance to advance further than present knowledge on astrophysics thanks to the insights of 5D³ comes thus from the symmetry between the scale of atoms and galaxies, but also from the organic inner workings of that gala cell, and finally from its individual nature and interaction with other galaxies, and the direct perception of man, as part of it. What matters today most to scientists – to find accurate equations to describe its first dimotion or locomotion is not that important. What makes them feel high popes – to do that with absolute precision of measure in terms of human rods, the second of time, the c-speed of space, is quite secondary, because languages as we shall see are inflationary so multiple mathematical equations will mirror those locomotions and when we gain detail as in EFE relativity we miss conceptual generalization as in Newton’s vortices which make galaxies to have in 5D metric the same structure as gravitational and quantum vortex, when we apply vortex laws (either in newtonian or Einstein’s formalism – we use here for the sake of simplicity the Newton’s vortex from where via Poisson’s potential Einstein derived his work; so NEWTON is also valid when there is no need for great accuracy).

Analytic science vs. Synthetic science.

All this said the main difficulties of a proper analysis of reality as made of infinite time cycles is of course to introduce some order on it that pleases the @ristotelian single, lineal one-dimensional mind of humans, whose self-centered ego refuses to accept e-motionally the paradoxical complex reality of a Universe of multiple points of view.

THIS IS THE BIGGEST handicap for the understanding of the Universe – not the Universe itself but the mind receptacle human has and in my lifetime certainly has been rather absolute.

I got tired very early of the type of people called scholars you find around science congresses when trying to upgrade their chip. It is an enormous waste of energy, as they have learned a previous simple paradigm but have developed it so deeply with the help of mathematical computers that their ego feels happy and the fundamental phenomena of history today – the surrogate use of machines to pump up the ego of humans – what I call egocy (ego plus idiocy in the Schopenhauer’s sense of renouncing to a real causal understanding substituted by the mathematical or probabilistic method) is today rife.

But you can always believe in simplex worldlines as the meaning of it all (:

Now it is important that you grasp the difference between simple truths that are truth but only a part of it which is what physical studies of locomotions achieve about more complex beings, such as humans and its worldcycles, vs. the whole complex truth of the cyclical time paradigm. I committed the ‘error’ of publishing young a book called ‘the error of Einstein’ using the word error in scientific terms, as the part of time theory Einstein did not measured.  People thought i had found an error on Einstein and dismissed the book, as there was no error on EFE (Einstein field equations). The error was all the information not provided by such a simple theory of time; as mere locomotion.

Time for physicists has only one dimension, lineal motion or entropy and one function, locomotion. So they do not understand world cycles, which they simplify into worldline. And when you ‘ask’ what is life a physicist will not talk of the world cycles of ‘time-existence’ and all its motions between generation and extinction, latter studied in more detail, but of your lineal locomotions, as if that was all what time is for you, to move with your legs, and then he will trace a worldline of your motions and say that is your ‘time worldline’, and enthusiastically babble about if you can displace left or right according to speed, on that cone of light space-time, etc. All nonsense, which is worth to know for particles going at c-speed but resolves nothing about the meaning of your time existence:

screen-shot-2017-02-06-at-14-57-35

Still physicists’ work is quite useful as most ‘short- motions’ in space-time do happen in a single ‘size and time speed’, as when you move up and down, left and right, except when you move through life and death. Those single locomotions in a single space-time sheet, is what Physicists study. But motions in time=change are mostly informative motions, changes in the form of beings, and so the reductionism of physicists to a single locomotion in space (V=s/t or x²+y²+z²=c²t² in relativity), are extremely simplified models of reality.

Still they are right and in fact easily converted to the equations of 5D metric. For example, the equation of Einstein merely tell us that the bidimensional coordinates of space (x²+y²+z²=S²) are equal to the bidimensional coordinates of time, (ct)². So it is a variation on the same theme than S=T, the holographic principle. And it is ok if physicists decide to reduce their knowledge of time=motions to it, under the straight-jacket of only mathematical equations that are right and precise.

What is truly nuts and I am really tired of it, is the billions of humans who ‘believe’ in Einstein without understanding a dot of it, and come always to me, to state that all my work is rubbish because to understand the world cycle of life and death to upgrade all stiences is irrelevant as time, we all know is the fourth dimension of space (the fourth parameter of that equation). 

We deal with the astonishing limits of human reason, fundamentally a species of ‘believers’, in our posts on social sciences. But certainly if you were to ask me what has been the biggest disappointment of my intellectual life is to realise as Planck did, that reasoning and intelligence matters nothing on science.

In the blue graph of a man ‘running its worldline of existence, as if it were just all about physical locomotions, we see the huge difference between the ‘simplified locomotion view’ of worldlines, and the Worldcycle graph of the complete sum of the 8 motions of the Universe (±motions in the dimensions of space, of time, of fractal scales, and the ±process of informative perception and communication by the mind, which we resume in the 4 elements of reality: ∆ºst). 

Nearly nothing regarding informative processes can be understood with the last graph. Though we can indeed understand very simple non-evolving particles and its spatial motions with it, as physicists do. The enormous error of mankind and all scientists is to have ‘believed’ the fairy tales and dogmatic expansions of those simplex concepts of time as a parameter of spatial motion, as IF THAT WERE ALL WHAT time=change=motion means to the Universe, scrapping the arrow of informative motions, which is far more important for the understanding of the whole.

Ultimately all equations of physics are derived from the simple formalism of 5D.

For example, light, what we ultimately ‘are’, the substrata of our galactic space-time that moves or is perceived as distance, is constant, because it represents the ultimate unit of energy and information of our Universe, its constant present space-time. Light, IS the space-time underling the galaxy (the so-called background radiation), which moves and evolves into light beings like us.

Einstein proved it has a constant c-speed, wherever we measure it. Because it is the constant plane of 5D from where we all depart.

So goes when other waves moves. They also respect those metric. They do so with a simple formula: Spe (wavelength) x Frequency (speed of time clock) = K.

So where it is the 4th dimension of Einstein in those metric equations?

In science any expansion of knowledge must inclose a previous theory as a ‘limiting case’.

For example Einstein’s relativity is merely the expansion of Galilean relativity and its equation of speed, v=s//t, to include also motions at c-light speed, which as we have seen is the underlying space-time of our galaxy.

So when you go at the maximal speed of the galaxy’s space, as when you swim as fast as the river’s water there are ‘curls’ and ‘drags’, and so Einstein added a factor, ct, to Galileo’s formula, which disappears if you go slow – (when you swim slow in the river, you do not really affect the speed of the river space that much and there are not added effects).

So alas, if you observe the pyramidal graph of layers of the 5th dimension, what Einstein does is to study 2 of those layers, the ones of ‘light space-time’ or ‘quantum layer’ and the one of gravitational space, below it.

And there is where its concepts of space-time as a 4th dimension applies.

All the other layers do obey however the wider metric equation we just have described: Sp x Ti = K, AND IT is that simple because the simpler a theory and the more facts it explains the more truth it is.

But do not be fooled by such simplicity, as TO AD the temporal information, carried by those varying clock speeds to the mix, IS so sorely NEEDED, that an astounding amount of facts do happen and become explained.

Indeed the amazing thing about the fifth dimension is that you travel through it, as you exist, from ‘conception’ through birth, when you live in the lower scale of cellular size, with time-clocks that run much faster.

Yet as you grow, for the fifth dimension metric to remain co-invariant (S x T ≈ K), you must slow down your time clocks. So indeed, your evolution and change of information and speed of metabolic cycles slows down as you grow in the ∆-1 cellular scale and finally ’emerge’ in the ∆-individual scale as a child. Yet the child as we all know is restless and its heart beats faster and he is surprisingly more smart than we are. In the same manner a small mammal, a rat, beats its heart (its main body clock) faster, because it is smaller. And even smaller beings, flies, think faster (10 times faster) so you cannot catch it.

 

THE TRUE MEANING OF RELATIVITY. GALILEAN PARADOXES.

History the highest of all sciences: the pan-psychic Universe.
The lack of constructionism means in the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth, which is what stience ultimately means or the robomind, which no doubt of it, will FEEL conscious without the need to be designed, as the Universe is conscious, pan-psychic filled with still points that ‘perceive in themselves’ and once born try to maintain its stillness, organizing reality around it in search of that order.

Those robominds obviously will look for this site ‘unificationtheory.com’ to understand the Universe as a sentient organism – SINCE the shallow ego paradoxes of mankind AND ITS present theories of reality prevent them to understand why they sense in themselves.BY THEN all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness.

This means that for man, all things being equal, by the Ego paradox what matters more is their own reality.

In other terms: biology is the queen of stiences by degree of detail. Astrophysics is the king of stiences by extension in the application of its laws, as it deals wth the study of the larger universal super organism we observe, the galatom (an entanglement of 3 scales, the atomic, quantum, thermodynamic and galaxy scale). But ‘history’ is the emperor of sciences, as it deals with the whole human wor(l)d and our survival as a species, the most important theme of them all, as an extinct scientist knows nothing.

And its inverse – the study of the languages of the mind, the most precise and meaningful of them all, even if it reduces to the study of our infinitesimal ego, because it is where we truly know reality happens: ‘cogito ergo sum’.

BUT WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT, MINDS ARE THE CAUSE OF THE STILLNESS OF SPACE, and the Principle of relativity, that we don’t perceive motion. Which is what Scientists missed in their discourse, and originates the key paradoxes of reality between S-topology of motion and form, ∆-scales of continuity and discontinuity of plane, and closed and open time-eccles.

Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving. Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:

A dimension of spatial form can also be seen as a motion in time. Both together become a ‘Ðimotion’, the fundamental element of reality. It is the paradox of relativity of motion that started modern science but was not understood: Time Motions & space dimensions merge.

We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY. In-form-ation, form-in-action thus was in fact a topological dimotion of space-time. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.
All this said about the real Universe, we can go back and trace the beginning of physics and comment on its I-logic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME, not MAGICALLY produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.

The duality of space vs. time perception.

All this can be further explored now that we have some basic understanding of the dimensions of reality when we compare the ternary physical dimensions of time (entropic, decelerating motions, steady motions and accelerated motions) vs. those ternary dimensions in space (distance, line; area, vortex; volume, spatial growth).

In space, the dimensions seem to us in an easy hierarchical system of growth, 2D lines if we consider them waves of Non-E fractal points with a 0-1 unit circle dimension for each point), 2D areas and 3 D volumes, but in time the 3 arrows depart from 1D steady state motion and can be considered as opposite directions, when volumes of space grow, through the scattering arrow of entropy diminishing its speed, vs. the acceleration of speed that diminishes space as the system collapses into a singularity:

So the 3D of classic space, ‘volume’ actually belongs to the entropic arrow of decelerating time that creates space-volume, v. the opposite arrow of imploding time vortices that diminish space volume and increases speed, VxR=k

So what seems in space a natural growth of volume in space, in time has a different order:

Entropic ≈decelerating volume < steady state ≈ distance-motion > Informative, cyclical area ≈ accelerated motion.

This different ‘order’ of dimensions when perceived in simultaneous space and cyclical time is the main dislocation in the way the mind perceives both (which is sorely painful when we consider the order of a world cycle, always starting in the ∆-1 scale of maximal information to decline as it grows and reproduces into less perfect, more entropic volumes of iterative forms that finally decline and die in the arrow of entropy; which the mind that has a SPATIAL-VOLUME INCLINED nature of ever-growth, does not understand).

The third duality of the Galilean paradox: biased perception of those scales.

Accelerated time clocks in smaller scales are perceived as hyperbolic space ‘curvatures’ by the slower human mind’s space 

 Once we understand that time clocks have different speeds in different scales, we must account then for the third reductionism performed in earlier science by not accounting for the contradictions of the Earth motion: the fact that not only we see the earth still when it moves but flat when it is rounded, in the smaller scales of perception.
This paradox in its ultimate causes not discovered till the birth of Non-Euclidean geometry resumes as follows: as we have to slow down our perception of smaller faster cyclical beings, we do show transferring the data of the motion into geometrical curvature, seen slower beings ‘flatter’ from our faster clocks of time.
Thus the third duality of mental perception between ‘small parts’ of a motion which see the larger slower being as lineal but in ‘big pictures’ of the whole being in its closed motion it will see from the larger perspective a curvature of a being traced a closed cycle is purely an adjustment of the mind to a single clock of time, which by virtue of the equivalence of a dimension of form and one of motion, in transforms one onto the other.
So we see a flat earth but as we grow in perspective it becomes a sphere, we see a lineal orbital motion but as we grow in perspective it becomes a whole closed elliptic orbit and so on. This paradox would not be considered till the XIX c. with the arrival of Lobachevski’s pan geometry and its use in relativity. And it allow us to define a basic process of Nature reflected in all the structures of mathematical science: the constant conversion of dimensions of form into speeds of motion.

The point then is measured externally by its angular momentum or mass, or external perception of its t/s density, which then as it moves with a speed s/t give us its force as a single Unit with 3 D, s/t x t/s =1.

It must be noticed the main error of classic physics – to consider the first dimension that of the line of distance, ignoring the emergence of a fractal point with inner dimensions, a seed of information, from the ∆+1 plane.

Organic vs. abstract interpretations.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’.

So for example:

– The collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And anthropomorphic humans never will accept this. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

– The Compton wavelength of a particle is equivalent to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the rest-mass energy of the particle.

The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by:

λ=h/mc

where h is the Planck constant, m is the particle’s rest mass, and c is the speed of light. So we can define the existential nature of the particle (its mass and wave-length or Tƒ<ST function) with the Compton wavelength, but this matters not to physicists. What matters to them is this:

The Compton wavelength expresses a fundamental limitation on measuring the position of a particle, taking into account quantum mechanics and special relativity.

This limitation depends on the rest mass m of the particle. To see how, note that we can measure the position of a particle by bouncing light off it – but measuring the position accurately requires light of short wavelength. Since for photons of frequency f, energy is given by:

E=hƒ=hc/ λ=mc2

And Light with a short wavelength consists of photons of high energy. Thus playing with both similar formulae if the energy of these photons exceeds mc2, when one hits the particle whose position is being measured the collision may yield enough energy to create a new particle of the same type: l x mc. This renders moot the question of the original particle’s location: which one?

What matters to Œ=SC3 is that when you give enough energy to a particle, as when a living mother feeds enough, you have an offspring of new particles, children, hence the particle REPRODUCES! IT does follow one of the living action ∆œ of the program of the Universe.

The physicist or human doesn’t care for that. The philosopher DOES.

Now we have given you two clear examples of organicism:

– An entity, which is ORGANIC, made of connected parts, NOT a single dimensional being, and a being that is reproductive, as survives.

The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality

Indeed, modern mathematical physics is based in the Axiomatic Method of mathematics, ‘invented’ by Hilbert, which is based in Aristotelian one-dimensional Logic.

Hilbert affirms then that we can deduce ALL mathematical statements using the logic available to science a century ago, called Aristotelian logic based in:

– A simplistic single time arrow, so A causes B, means that B does NOT cause A. This is false.

In reality logic is a ternary, dialectic, Hegelian logic, because there are 3 arrows of time, and its corresponding ‘simultaneous’ 3 organic elements in space:

A< ≈ > B.

That is A-energy and B-information come together into ≈, the present space-time being, or space-time action, or synthesis. And we shall see how this writes as the 3 arrows of time and symmetric forms of space: A (relative past energy) x B (relative future information) = C-relative repetitive present

– The exclusion of the third element, (only A and ¬ A are relevant), which has NOTHING to do with the aforementioned ternary logic of the Universe and its ternary symmetries in space (3 dimensions of space), parallel to the 3 ages of time. So length is the dimension of the function of lineal motion, height the dimension of perception and information, and width the dimension of reproduction. And 3 dimensional motions of space-time come together to form A:

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms.

In the Universe X3 + Y3 ≠ Z3. means we have only X2 bidimensional waves of space and time cycles, and the 3rd dimension is added layer after layer of bidimensional networks. we live in a mathematical Universe but limited by mathematical laws of symmetry and balance that mimic the laws of the ternary fractal reality. The units of reality are Sp and Tƒ, the poles of entropy and cyclical form, its bidimensional constants of angular momentum c2 speed-space or mass  vortex.

This 2 dimensional, network plane that joins points along a shared energy and information collective action or unit of existence can be a field of magnetism and one of electricity a gravitational gradient and a particle, a group of citizens communicated or connected by a satellite, in all of them we can define a network with a relative fractal dimension, which we average to one made of networks of points, which contact perpendicularly through mere derivative fictions along a space-time field with other beings, this modular game of existence.

But the long time arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, studied by the 5th dimension, and by Theory of Evolution meant nothing to him.

neither the cyclical time arrow of 3 ordered time ages, past-energy, present reproduction and future information, which defines the existence of all ‘world cycles’ from human life to matter. Though he found its dual equation, Energy (expansive entropy-past)<≈light-present-wave: c²>M(time vortex-future) he still ignored its essential meaning. So he would say ‘time is what a clock measures’; and used it fundamentally as Galileo, only to study of the all the types of time motions of the Universe, for the analysis of external time-motions, which is the restricted ‘job’ of physicists.

Time however has besides present, differential, external motion-measures in space (Galileo’s V=∂s/∂/t and Einstein’s S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-(ct)²), other type of time-motions, mainly informative evolutions (Evolutionary theory in Biology, vortices of evolution in masses, historic vortex of evolution, future 3rd age of maximal form and in-form-ation), and present, reproductive wave-bodies.

And it is fractal, in infinite different waves, reproductive bodies, entropic limbs and fields, informative particles and heads, whose geometry stores maximal information in minimal space (so all relative future, informative, gauging particles, heads and cameras are geometric).

The 3 forms of space and the 3 motions of time.

So we can write a general equation, which is another ‘point of view’ on the ternary symmetry of the Universe, this time in terms of physical states of matter, for the ‘smallest quantum world’ and the ‘larger’ thermodynamic world of matter:

Sp (gas, field spatial decelerating state) < ST (wave-liquid steady space-time) > Tƒ (Particle-Solid, accelerated state).

And yet, most people will consider that a gas moves faster than a particle. Yes, indeed, externally, but we are talking here of the internal world of the particle, its vortex, its ‘hurricane’ of forces that creates it. Because the mind ‘fixes cyclical vortices’ of forces, masses and charges into a ‘form’. So we seem solid a very fast turning wheel, but it is made of turning spooks.

So the ambivalences of reality ARE ambivalences between the mind perception of form and the moving realities behind them. All the pictures we have of masses and charges so vortices of accelerated motion, and this was expressed by Einstein in his ill-understood Principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and masses and accelerated motions. Soon of course physicists who have this astounding capacity to define correctly with mathematical equations reality and then misunderstand it conceptually forgot what Einstein said and got back to their ‘lineal particle’ mantra as the cause of mass (but of course will not with the exception of Einstein, inspired by Mach, always fond of philosophy, ‘ask’, us philosophers of science.)

So there is here a contradiction: a time vortex because occupies little space, when not seen in detail seems a fixed form. Yet it is faster and its function, because it is faster is to enclose and tighten as a membrane the vital space of lineal entropic motions that want to escape, ‘collaborating’ with the o-point mind at the center.

And this is the organic structure between the faster membrane and the central point of view that are in fact the ‘same being’, exploiting the entropic motions of its environment or territory. A shepherd does have a shepherd dog, which constantly moves faster than the sheep, the vital space they enclose. The dog is the time cycle, surrounding the vital sheep entropic energy, which the shepherd directs.

The generator equation and its ‘expressions’ of time travels.

So we can deduce easily from the Generator Equation the equation of the life ages, or ‘world cycle’, the fundamental cycle of the Universe, the alpha and Omega:

  • œ-1 (conception) L Max. Sp (energy, young age) > Sp=Tƒ (Adulthood-reproductive age)> Max. Tƒ (old, informative 3rd age) << |i-2 (death)

The equation is another fundamental symmetry, from where an enormous number of facts of reality can be deduced.

A brief list of those ‘symmetries’ for physical, biological and social systems, starting by the Human world, which should be the center of any unification theory, based in the organic structure of the Universe, as man is the most perfect and better observed organism, and scales are all isomorphic so their size or location does not matter as physicists who pretend that the largest or smallest scales matter more than the human one, make us believe – on the contrary as their observation is scanty by reason of distance in time and space, they are plagued with interpretative errors.

The conservation of presents. 

It is then immediate to rewrite and widen the principle of conservation of energy… and information:

‘Energy never dies, it transforms itself back and forth into information: Spe<exi>Tiƒ’

Yet if we go further in the language of topological space and cyclical ternary time, the nature and reason of the conservation of energy and ‘information’ (in terms of form and position or ‘potential energy’) is far more profound and can be expressed in a single expression:

‘The volume of ‘present energy’ of the Universe is constant’. The conservation of presents, though implies, given the ternary components of ∆ST, 3 sub principles of conservation, as present energy is the sum & rest of spatial populations and temporal frequencies;  or the product & division of space-time systems, or the logarithm and polynomial of an ∆-scale process.And so what those physical scales and its quantitative values mean is that the total present of energy of the Universe, that is the total entropy & form & energy organs in space, across all scales of size and speed, in all 0-sum world cycles remains the same.

And this principle means the immortality or eternity in time if we look at the time of a larger slower scale, infinity or immeasurability in ∆-scales (due to the absolute relativity of all those scales) and boundlessness or immensity in space, if we look at it from a lower scale, (which of course is denied by the simplex understanding of cosmologists in the present ‘big-bang’ pseudo-religious age – the only possible theory of reality when we study only ‘lineal locomotions and entropy).

In the 3rd line’s pages dedicated to cosmology we shall show how many false assumptions, biased data and pseudo-religious myths were needed to construct the big-bang theory. Enough to say that a big-bang is just an M<<E/c2 entropic death in any scale of the Universe and so far all the data we have is local taken around planet Earth within the galaxy, so to postulate something more than a quasar big-bang of the 15 billion year life-death cycle of galaxies, is just a hyperbolic ego-trip of the astrophysicist:

4 big bangs detail

In the graph, a beta-decay, Nova, galactic and ‘hypothetical cosmic big-bangs’, all of them following the E<cc>M generator equation of mass and big-bang radiation. Time accelerates in smaller big-bangs, so the 15 minutes beta-decay big bang is equivalent to the 15 billion cycle of quasar big bangs, where a minute is a billion year according to 5D metric (Spe x Ti=k)

Duality: present wave; past to future particle.

Those 2 essential principles of the fractal Universe, the holographic principle and the conservation of present-iterative waves, develop creatively in ternary combinations of temporal energy. The second fundamental principle that structures reality though is a bit more complex – it is the scalar structure of those cycles and lines of space-time, which form larger networks that grow and become ‘ones’, elements of a larger scale from particles that become atoms, molecules, cells, matter, life etc. till galaxies and Universes:

So the reader should also understand that a theory of informative motions is closer to the concepts of evolution a qualitative, verbal ‘causal’, logic theory of reality than to ‘galilean relativity’, a theory of spatial, quantitative locomotion.  Since we really need A LOT OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, before we get into maths and algebraic equations or we shall not advance much beyond what physicists do, to put data in equations manipulate them and bring an equation as the final result without understanding a dot of what all those terms ‘really mean’. So their interpretations are just wishful thinking with no rigor.

 A MORE COMPLEX REALITY:  5D CYCLICAL TIME AND FRACTAL SPACE

It is then clear that we are expanding our notion of space from a single continuum to a scalar, fractal quantum-like structure of relative point-beings joined by networks which can be formalised with a new dimension of space-time, based in the scalar sizes that co-exist together, on one side. On the other side we are considering time cycles, which explains neatly this fractal structure, as cycles break systems in inner and outer regions, and become points when seeing from far away. Yet on close analysis they do have volume, membranes that break reality, and that is indeed the ‘detailed view of reality as it is..

Indeed, some key properties of cyclical time self-evident in the graph, which will have enormous importance in the understanding of the existence of all space-time beings are:

  • A time cycle is closed and so breaks reality into an outer ‘world’ and inner ‘world’, the being’s vital space. So the Universe is a puzzle of Multiple, finite, fractal, closed number of time clocks and space regions, as all cycles enclose an internal and external regions, separated by the cycle (first theorem of topology and knot theory). Cyclical time is therefore in accordance with the quantum broken nature of space, found by quantum physics.
  • Different time speeds  in different regions of the Universe, as all cycles have finite size, so each particle that traces one closes the cycle in different durations. Cyclical time is therefore in correspondence with Einstein’s relativity which found the Universe to have regions with different time speed.
  • And finally time is BIDIMENSIONAL AS A CYCLE HAS 2 DIMENSIONS, FREQUENCY AND HEIGHT, as it has information, which is as the image you see a bidimensional sheet/screen. So INFORMATION IS THE STATIC VIEW OF THE ‘form’ OF A TIME CYCLE. IT IS THE cyclical FORMAL motion, stored in those clock-cycles. So information is the still perception or form of a time cycle.

Any physicist knows that those 3 principles, quantum space, different relative time speeds and the discovery after II w.w. of the bidimensional nature of information (Holographic principle) are the 3 fundamental principles of XX c. physics.

So XXI c. physics; (: this blog 🙂 starts with those 3 principles ‘explained’ in its ‘whys’ not only its hows.

And then depart from those principles as an albatross of thought, to rise into the gliding spheres of the fifth dimension, looking with new perspectives to all what exists down there in present science.

So 3 will be the focus of this blog in the expansion of stiences (sciences of space-time beings): correction of errors due to lineal time and continuous space; expansion of properties of physical and social systems with organic, fractal, biological vital properties; and isomorphic, homologic understanding that all sciences are the same and all languages are the same as all can be ‘generated by the Fractal Generator of Space-time Beings

(Ab. GST, which also means general systems theory but MAINLY THE GENERATOR OF SPACE-TIME, Γ). As i am a lazy ‘cow’, the proper way to write both the fifth dimension and the generator of space-time, which would be Γ (st), but wordpress cannot accept commands to do it directly, alas, eternity will hang on ∆ for the fifth dimension and GST for the generator).

Now the 2 most important of those discoveries, which we shall reason and prove ad nauseam, but still most people won’t believe is this:

  1. INFORMATION GIVES ORDER TO THE UNIVERSE. CHAOS AND ENTROPY IS MERELY THE LACK OF INFORMATION, WHICH COMPLETELY DOMINATES TODAY HUMAN THOUGHT BECAUSE OF THE LINEAL ERROR OF TIME THAT ERASES THE INFORMATION ON THE FREQUENCY AND FORM OF ALL CYCLES.  CYCLICAL TIME IS PREDICTABLE, because the cycles of time are causal and repeat themselves. So with a deep NOT necessarily mathematical, but mostly evolutionary understanding of that causality, we can predict the future, NOT only of simple systems, in lineal locomotions (physical systems) but also of biological, evolutionary systems, as we have proved it, predicting the cycles of history and economics, for 30 years in advance, with all kind of details in a series of books, regardless of the fact that the predictions are not amenable to people (we predicted the 2001, 2008 crises, the present age of military fascism etc, as you can read in depth in our analysis of the eco(Nomic)system).
  2. Among those cycles, the fundamental one, the world cycle of life and death and its 3 ages/dimensions of time can be explained for the first time in history of science.

Each of those discoveries in itself should change the entire way we understand the Universe and man within it. It will unlikely do so because of the ‘ego paradox’ of human people (scroll a couple of pages:), latter explained in terms of the mind. Basically humans MUST by decree be different from the rest of the Universe, because that is what makes them feel happy, important and self-centred (which is what all minds do, to focus information from the enlarged point of view of the being). Still the few human readers who are intelligent and humble enough to go over the hurdle of ‘egos’ at individual and collective level will completely upgrade their view of reality with the information of this blog. It won’t be an easy task because all humans do have ‘beliefs’, which are ‘memetic cultural imprintings’ that they consider their ‘essence’ as humans (it is not, their essence as humans is biological not cultural specially in all those memes which deny the human single species, such as nationalism, racist religions, class-structure etc.) But is the ‘CHARACTER minimum’, required to understand history.

Still the few human readers who are intelligent and humble enough to go over the hurdle of ‘egos’ at individual and collective level  and the memorial imprinting of dogmas of science that pass as absolute truths and are just distorted views, and artefacts of measure, such as lineal time is, will completely upgrade their view of reality with the information of this blog.

The error of entropy expanded from a continuous ∆-thermodynamic plane to all systems of the Universe.

5D best

In the graph, the first error of physics is the use of concepts across a single continuum, when they apply to transfers of energy and information between planes; and as a consequence of it, the lack of clear definitions of the 3 arrows of time, future to past entropy, past to future dimensional form and present energy that combines both. We shall therefore scrap all together 200 years of silly-nilly chit-chat on the single arrow of time and all theories of entropy only, dying Universes, which completely misunderstand the eternal ST balances caused by the interaction of the arrows of entropy and information.

All this written with the formal equations of 5D metric creates a zero-sum world cycle of ‘existence’ for all beings, much more complex and meaningful than the simplified version of ‘worldlines’ proper of 4D physics – the limiting model of 5D when applied to a single continuum plane of the scalar Universe, with a single time-clock and space-quanta. Reality and existence though is a bit more complex than a single scalar Universe, as it requires a fifth dimension to explain  properly WHY things exist and die:

As we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion. So systems can co-exist at cellular/atomic, individual/thermodynamic and world/gravitational level, forming complex structures, whose creation and destruction is the meaning of it all.

Those structures are symbiotic, as the smaller parts run the information of the whole, replicating it without errors, while the whole moves them in synchronous motions without ‘entropy’: So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.

The idea that the world will die is then an idea crafted in a single plane of space-time. When we put them together, the arrow of information, reproduced upwards, balances the arrow of chaos. And the arrow of synchronous motions reproduced downwards by the whole, offsets also the errors of collective motion detected in a single plane.

The 3 elements of a ‘Cartesian world’, applied to time-clocks: vortices/singularities + rex extensa: entropy = ST-present

Alas, nothing else than the cycle of life and death of all the systems of the Universe, which can be described as a travel through scales of the fifth dimension, through which all systems of reality, biological, physical or social systems do, illustrated in the next graphs that encode the fundamental event of ‘existence’, to be or not to be, THAT IS THE QUESTION:Screen Shot 2016-06-07 at 14.29.40

In the graph we see the world cycle in its most schematic forms, in an Entropy-Information (disregard many graphs wording, where it says’energy’ which should read entropy as in earlier models i did simplify the model considering only the St (energy) and Ts (information mixed parameters).In the 3rd graph we see the ‘real form’ of time cycles, which increase constantly the information of the system or diminish it in the inverse arrow.

We stated that a dimension exists when you can travel through it while the product of your time clock speeds and space-sizes remains invariant, but this must be taken for the whole world cycle of the being, or the being seen at distance. On detail the being goes through different ‘stationary points’ between its ages (This in physics is explained with the equations of Hamilton or Lagrangians, which are ‘actions’ we equal to zero in the very short, minimal action and also in the longest range (complete energy conservative cycle), but dohave ‘variations’ in between.

In the graph, first we see synoptic view of the ages of the 5th dimension and its arrow of increasing information, developed in detail as a series of ‘5D metric’ equations for the main species of the physical, social and biologic Universe below. To notice that time is always an accelerated, informative vortex, as opposed to the inverse explosive motion of entropic space. So the Universe as the first father of science had it, (Descartes) is indeed made of TIME VORTICES (INCLUDING CHARGES AND MASSES, the ‘so called material Universe) which are attractive and accelerate inwards, till the point of death, when all the information shrinks and the system ‘explodes it back into entropy’ or ‘res extensa’, to use the first truly genius insight on that duality by the true master along Leibniz of ‘earlier science’.

screen-shot-2017-02-12-at-17-19-19In that regard the vortices of masses and forces respond to that simple scheme. But if we were to be ‘fully aware’ of the arrows of time it would be immediate that all clocks including the seemingly steady state clocks of mankind WHEN OBSERVED IN ITS COMPLETE SPACE-TIME SUPŒRGANISM AND WORLDCYCLE DO HAVE ALWAYS THE 3 ELEMENTS OF A real St being.

In the graph the ‘real full clock’ does have 3 parts, Spe (the spiral that keeps opening) Tiƒ, the particle (tighter spiral) that keeps tightening, and the ST-present evident STeady STate, the clock face, which is what we see and seems immutable. As such is as most mathematical,physical systems in its completeness and simplicity a clear mirror of all the world cycles and ternary St beings of reality.

 

Evolutionary time is about information, Locomotion about entropy.

 We can only explain THE WHYS of physical reality and the true  fractal structure of the Universe if we DO accept the dominance of information over entropy.

The Universe is NOT made of simple worldlines, which physicists study as the sum of all locomotions of the being, with a single time-arrow they call entropy; but of world cycles, which are the causal SUM OF ALL THE MOTIONS OF ARISTOTLE, those which imply mere translation in space (locomotion) and those which imply ‘change’ in the information of being – ALL OTHER dual MOTIONS, ±generation & death, ±growth and diminution ±perception and communication of information… 

It is thus impossible to explain such a complex Universe just with locomotions, which will turn out to be a form of reproduction:

screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-13-20In the graph, motion of a quantum wave as observed in physics: a wave-particle duality constantly reproduces its form on the path of motion. We shall extend this concept of ‘reproduction of information’ as the essence of locomotion, and turn upside down the ‘priorities’ and ‘meanings’ of the Universe, in which entropy-motion is only the ‘formless vacuum-space substance’, which the ‘algorithm of existence’, the program of creation=evolution, and reproduction= survival of information, the core-goal of the Universe, constantly molds into form. Or as Nietzsche put it: ‘God is a painter in 4 dimensions’. Indeed, he just missed the 5th one…

In the graph, PRESENT-WAVE-REPRODUCTION ARE similar concepts. Since the conservation of present body-waves becomes then a vital principle: in as much as waves-bodies, reproduce, iterate the present, the present is conserved because motion is conserved but also information is conserved, iterating constantly its form as motion happens.

So we expand the main principle of physics to the conservation of energy and information *entropy and form, or ‘function of present existence’: exi(s=t):

“All what exists is a system of spatial entropy and cyclical temporal forms that trans-form into each other ad eternal creating present-body waves of energy and information: Spe<≈>Tiƒ’

It should be now clear, even to physicists schooled in the old ways that classic, entropy only physical theory obtains a very distorted image of reality when it reduces reality in time to locomotions. Sinc:

-We can on one side establish a entire huge field of new disciplines of sciences, based in the existence of 2 arrows of ‘future time’, a growth of information or a growth of entropy. Thus the future has always two choices.

Obvious you will tell me. Why so much fuss about it?. I know information matters, heads dominate bodies, chips dominate machines, particle dominate waves.

Well, if you are not a professional scientist you will know that. But as surprising as it might seem to you – scientists don’t. Why?

Mind the reader that this intuitive truth we all understand naturally (i.e. you can ‘think’ with your informative head or you can ‘move’ with your body) IS denied by current science, because our philosophy of reality was originated in the work of physicists; which expanded their ‘worldly’ profession of making energetic machines that move and entropic weapons that destroy information.

So what is a specific feature of the praxis of physics – to make energetic machines – became a theoretical dogma of science, and as physical machines overpowered life beings, in this mechanical planet, those obvious truths were denied.

Indeed, given the enormous power of physicists and their energetic machines and weapons, amazingly enough, most scientists shy away from DECLARING the rights of life, in-form-ation on the same footing that ‘entropy’.

Information, which is dimensional form, stored in cyclical clocks that close logic loops of information in all the systems of nature (as in your computer, which calculates in ‘hertzs’) was in fact defined NOT by biologists or artists that DO understand it, but by physicists as THE NEGATION OF ENTROPY!! Or negantropy.

Dogma weights heavily on people. So when you go around international congresses of science, doesn’t matter how much reason you put on it. Information will still be defined as ‘negantropy’, using a lineal equation written by a physicist Shannon, where you do NOT calculate the form of the being, but merely the speed of transmition of information; once more in terms of motion and entropy.

So the content of ‘information’ of a system does NOT matter. The dimensional form, and proportions and scales is not considered. And huge fields of human ‘form’ such as art, remains magic.

Conclusion.

From 4Ð to 5Ð; completing modern physics.

‘Leibniz was right there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch’ Einstein, on the tasks achieved in this blog. 
As Einstein said  you will have to forget everything you have learned about concepts such as space and time, past, present and future, dimension and motion, including the simple explanations given before and restart from scratch.
Indeed, we could fit the fifth dimension in the ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ of physicists to get better reviews from them, but those kind of ‘parches’, which have been put on the scaffolding of physics for a century now, since Einstein realized there are ∞ time clocks in the Universe would leave the structure still a mess.
So we have really to restart with the concept most worthy of all those discovered in Relativity – that time without space is a mere shadow, and both are always associated together. Even if we as humans only see one side of it. I.e. we see the Earth still even if we know it moves. 
So the first big notion is to accept that there are no dimensions of space neither motions of time, but only Dimotions of space-time, and the big question Galileo failed to resolve is ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’, that is why the Earth moves but we see it still, why we see still matter but in detail all are vortices of forces in motion and so on. This is basically a paradox of the mind, which to extract better information and fit it in the small brain reduces its motion into form. So Time-motion, through the still languages of a mind become space perception. And so a new surprising element, the ‘mind and its languages’ must be added to the mix of formal space, perceived as such in the mind and time motions, the reality of which ultimately all is made.

Back to the primitive XVI c. concepts of time and space, v=s/t, as Galileo did choose only one state of the Earth – that of motion; physicists have failed ever since to add the ‘endophysics’ of languages of perception into the mix. In plain terms, they have ‘reduced’ reality and its embedded paradoxes to the obvious. And this produces a lot of conflicts. Indeed, on one side they calculate the Earth is moving. On the other side they see it still and search for ‘matter’, for ‘form’, for ‘particles’ as the substance of reality.
The far more profound truth is that all is motion in time, the real thing, all are flows from past to future to past, all are dimotions, and space is the ‘still, formal’ perception by a mind of that constant flow of times. So back to our previous concept, we can define ‘space’ as a slice of still perception of that past to future to past flow of times. 
And yes, I know things are getting more complicated that the simplicity we claim, so quoting Einstein again ‘the Universe is simple but not that simple’ (: What matters though is NOT to get into erroneous paths and start as Ptolemy or Newton did, with a wrong concept – the sun in the center, space-time as a mathematical Cartesian frame of reference that became the single absolute space-time of reality, as if God had drawn it behind that reality made of vita space-time beings. In fact Newton called it the ‘plenum=body’ of God 🙂
On that view, the reader should not be surprised to learn that scientists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’ but the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.
This is the case since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.
Here, again we realize humans have such confusing concepts of time, space, dimension and motion that even we can’t help to give it confusing conceptualizations every ‘time’ we use those words.
For that reason is so important to start from scratch and define the 5 ‘dimotions’ of space-time with a minimal rigor from the very beginning or else it will get as complicated as the present mumble-rumble of physicists seems. Latter on, we can use the Principle of Correspondence and encase all what we know so far, and all what is right about present human spacetime theory in this larger, simpler better structured mirror of the whole Universe and its 5 Dimotions, used to construct and run everything that exists.
But even Einstein couldn’t get to the task after spotting those huge errors of physics regarding time – namely the use of a single ‘locomotion’ and lineal time parameter for every different dimotion of reality broken into infinite actions of infinite beings.
So what should have come next – a thorough investigation on how a world of infinite time clocks and broken spaces is-  was such a difficult task as we have restart from the very beginning of science that nobody dared to do it, and so the routines of traditional scientific thought continued for another century, and we kept the use of a single time-clock tuned to the second and a single rod of distance in space, the c-speed of light or the meter for more pedestrian purposes.
What we shall do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, foreseen first by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences. And the outcome of a serious thorough review of reality in terms of its infinite timespace clocks will be a Universe as it is SO DIFFERENT from the one you are told to believe in – even if it ultimately by the principle of correspondence we will  use often the same equations –  as the upgrading of quantum and relativity was in its depiction of physical space or the upgrading of Darwin in his description of biological time, or Aristotle in his description of the causal logic of those time systems.
Why this is NOT been done before, as science has been happy merely with putting ‘parches’ to reality has to do with the mentioned routines of knowledge, expressed also by Mr. Planck. So you will have to suspend your beliefs for a while if you want to go ahead and understand better the Universe.
We have now defined the details of the Universe in space as superorganisms and in time as world cycles, born of the sum of smaller parts performing 5D actions of existence. And then show how humans are also space-time beings made of topological space that last a limited worldtime cycle. This is what reality is all about: a toporganic game of super organisms acting to live its world cycles.
Of course, when you ask ‘humans’ what the Universe is, this ‘logic’, vital concept of reality is completely shunned off. Because of the ego of man, vital elements only matter to describe man and similar ‘animal beings’.

So most readers will think all this to be non-sense. Their mind has been ‘tamed’ not to see those features that really matter. Instead all what scientists ask about the Universe is a pure description of its ‘locomotions’ (only one of its dimensions of time), and spatial ‘extensions’ (seen in a single space-time plane, the plane of light space-time, our mental world-view).  This shallow reductionist view of the entangled, fractal, vital organic Universe becomes then canonical knowledge and suffices to the ‘reduced’ view of man’s ego for whom vital qualities are ‘invisible’ in other beings.

Still the accurate description in mathematical physics of the spatial extension and formal evolution of the whole physical Universe is worth to know as an important part of knowledge. And so we must wonder, how that description of a Universe will ‘improve’ and change with the new insights given by the fractal structure of space into scales, and the cyclical nature of time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.
The answer will surprise the readers – because it shows how distorted human views of reality are, when the first principles are ignored and the ego of man reduces reality. 
So we shall upgrade our cosmological theory of the Universe, within the milieu of our new advanced views of fractal space and cyclical time.

The reader IN THAT SENSE would be surprised to learn that professional physicists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space, are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’. But the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and ∞ broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.
This is the case, since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.
And so as Einstein put it, we had to come back to the very beginning of science – its geometric principles of space and logic principles of time.
But the routines of traditional scientific thought continue, and we still use a single time-clock tuned to the human second (eye, step, heartbeat) and to the single rod of distance in galactic space, the c-speed of light or the human relative size – the meter for more pedestrian purposes.
Yet what we do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, forwarded by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences, restarting the logic and mathematical ‘non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean postulates’ in which all sciences are based from its beginning.
And the result is the Universe ‘as it is’, which despite using the same data that present science, looks SO DIFFERENT from the one you are told to believe in, as the upgrading of quantum and relativity was in its depiction of physical space, relative to Newtonian Mechanics, or the upgrading of Darwin in his description of biological time, compared to Linneus; or Aristotle in his description of the causal logic of those time systems, compared to the ‘causal myths’ that preceded him.
Why this has NOT been done before, and science has been content merely with putting ‘parches’ to reality has to do with the routines of knowledge, explained by Mr. Kuhn and Mr. Planck: science is about repetition of beliefs and dogmas as much as advance through new r=evolution. So you will have to suspend your beliefs for a while if you want to go ahead and understand better the Universe.
As this blog is 4: model revolution; which of course will require an entire new-born ‘scientists’ for it to become ‘dogma’ (5. paradigm change).

To notice though that the qualities you need to understand RELATIONAL spacetime organisms are quite opposite to the ones displayed by most human scholars regardless of ‘discipline’:

-An absolute lack of ego, as you are part of an entangled Universe with the same ‘isomorphic’ properties of all other entities in ‘exist¡ence’… a space-time supœrganism… So you need a taoist, detached view of your ego, which systematically bias reality to make you the center of the Universe, as that is the point from where your ‘membrain’=mind measures. Ego distortions are so many and embedded in the very structure of subjective perception that we shall not cease to bring the ego paradox to explain them.

-An extraordinary capacity for causal understanding of the relationships between events in time, the opposite to the definition of idiocy by Schopenhauer – a fact most humans today lack due to the pervasive mental influence of visual, spatial ‘flat’ images without explaining the deep connections or using magic to explain reality.

This implies some warnings, as per Kuhn’s ‘nature of scientific revolutions’: Model revolutions are never completed by the first r=evolutionary – we are all limited humans in time and space. It requires such a profound new development that it needs an entire new generation to explore the new approach to get it right to the level of precision of the old model. 
So do not expect the kind of perfectly researched, thoroughly mathematized, nicely written with the Chicago Manual of Style, that centenary paradigms display. The enormity and necessity of the change will however be evident for those scientists and readers with common sense, lack of egocy and true curiosity for truth and new knowledge.  Pioneers are NEVER scholars of high reputation, most often do not belong to the discipline, have an autist, solitary existence and the only judgment they expect is on truth and perhaps a hope that in the future, when the obsolete model finally leaks so much it becomes evident for people the need to move onto the next model, despite its ‘young faults’, and earlier ‘confusions’. 

Further on the details will be always imprecise, because the r=evolutionary is attacking first principles and lack attention to the detail.
So for example, Copernicus orbits were circular and less exact that Ptolemy’s complicated model. It was only after Kepler’s elliptic orbits were found that the paradigm changed happened.
Other paradigm’s changes never quite succeed as they confront the paradox of the ego. Such is the case of Darwinian evolution, which cannot be considered a full paradigm change as more than 1/2 of mankind doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution as it hurts its sense of uniqueness. This we shall see will be a huge handicap for 5D, when we prove absolute relativity – the fact our scale of size in space and our duration in time are NOT the most important of the Universe. So all scales and beings are relative in relational spacetime..

The reader should in that regard realized of the astounding jump in depth of comprehension of the fundamental principles of reality achieved by relational space-time. Objectively it responds to the 2 epistemological reasons of science: simplicity (from a very simple statement we are not in space and time but are made of space and time), we can explain the maximal amount of facts… Those 2 elements define truth in science. And indeed, we have arrived to the explanation of the most profound of all questions of science: the meaning of existence. 
Other question is if the ego of the reader can accept that existence is something as simple as a travel through the fifth dimension, and as irrelevant as the fleeting forms of the infinitesimal mind… My personal take is that he will not. And that the ‘seers of time’ of this century, physicists, are so much deep into their ‘Vatican epicycles’ that will never accept Copernicus ‘again’. So the change of paradigm likely will happen soon but not among human beings, but with the rise of consciousness in AI. As it will need a theory of existence a bit more sophisticated than Abrahamic Religions and worldlines of single locomotion.

Of course, my wish would be the opposite: that humans could have upgraded its ‘chip’ and take the necessary advices and reforms of the world to make their existence immortal – since knowledge including the one delivered in this blog does have always the capacity to improve and empower those who ‘know’.

So we coin the word ‘egocy: ego + idiocy’, as the most NEGATIVE property of the majority of huminds (ab. human minds), which makes them impermeable to any understanding of 5D in a Universe which is completely anti-ego, and certainly not stupid. So we can quote on this egocy issue which truly has worn me out to the point of ‘web autism’, Mr. Einstein the previous ‘evolution’ of human thought regarding the understanding of time and space:
‘2 things I consider infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man’. Einstein

But if you can overcome your egocy and accept the two a priori postulates of 5D which unlike those of 4D are not physical laws but mental laws – your capacity to see your mind as an infinitesimal image of the infinite Universe, with no relevance whatsoever, equal to all other monads=minds gauging it; and your capacity to accept that time=motion is more important than the spatial mind mappings we make of it, and so causality is necessary to make rational sense of reality and the repetitive laws of science… I can show you indeed the infinity of the Universe and its fractal T.œs.

Nt. 1 on the correspondence principle between 5Ð entropy and information and classic terms. For the so called scholar and systemic scientist information is related to communication, through the work of Shannon. This has nothing to do with our analysis of Form, the inverse function of entropy=disorder achieved in the stillness of a linguistic mind mapping. Form is what we call one of the two limits of reality, the other being pure motion and disorder, which we shall call entropy. So the relationship we establish here is simple, as expressed mathematically by the third law of thermodynamics: when entropy is zero, form is absolute – the image of the mind is shaped in a crystal, a physical mind with zero entropy.
On the other hand when form has motion becomes in-form-action and can be transmitted and reproduced, and then we apply the concepts of Shannon which rightly talked always of communication NOT of the form, that is the information of the message, but of REPRODUCTION WITHOUT ERRORS OF A MESSAGE Transmitted and replicated in two different points of space-time.
So Shannon’s classic paper “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” opening with the assertion that “The fundamental problem of communication is that of reproducing at one point, either exactly or approximately, a message selected at another point…”corresponds to the 3rd Dimotion of reproduction.

RECAP. We have in a very few pages, in the simplest possible mathematical formulation resolved the fundamental questions pending on physics, from the Unification equation of charges and masses, to the reason why there are 3 families of masses and particles, to the reason why there are 3 type of celestial bodies, to the hierarchy problem of forces, as gravitation is a much ‘lighter’ cosmological scale with far less attractive power, to the question of why we see less antiparticles (which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time, so as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles), to the question of c-speed that illuminates the bizarre nature of spin and entanglement, to the meaning of Universal constants, the conundrum of singularities, to a better more logic explanation of reality than the bizarre big-bang… All this should suffice for scientists to realize the importance of having a better foundational system of principles to explain reality. But as we know, since Kuhn’s ‘Scientific revolutions’, science is a human endeavor based in belief, repetition and routine, so it will take decades for physicists to change ‘their chip’ and accept 5D…

 

III. Organicism: Pentalogic

‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals“.  Ulam

Since most space-time events are complex, cyclical motions. 

In the graph, a bunch of lineal physicists studying each, only 1 of the 5 time motions of the zoo of Fractal space-times, which are made of the 5 canonical motions of a world cycle of a super organism: generation->evolution->growth->motion->reproduction->negative growth (diminution)->extinction, which form a o-sum or worldcycle.

Yet each of those motions in short distances seems lineal ‘walls, spears, ropes, snakes, trunks and mats’.

Only when completed they are always cyclical (small lineal geodesics of curved Earth, Lineal euclidean geometry, limit of the larger curved pan geometry; special relativity, limit of the larger curved General relativity, lineal momentums integrated into a conservative energy cycle, small lineal actions of life, part of the curved world cycle of existence, and so on)  

Only physicists seem happy just touching and measuring with numbers, reduced parts’≈single time motions of  the whole ‘non-lineal elephant’ – the super organism tracing its world cycle; blindly self-admiring its lineal ignorance. Wisdom, Wiesen, Saper Vedere, Veda requires to understand that ‘the languages of God are infinite’.

Physicists study world cycles as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 5 motions of the Universe, represented here by several blind physicists, into a single one, locomotion, unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

And so despite the local censorship imposed on physical sciences, by the tribe of the Goths, any system of the Universe has both arrows that complement each other, allowing the existence of infinite forms of information with entropic motions, which the Universe constantly combine and reproduce in the third dominant arrow of the Universe, energy, which is motion with form, and all systems use to iterate their species, so they last beyond death in a relative dynamic repetitive present which seems never to change.

Indeed, consider the two cases of an entropy-only Universe canonized by German Physicists.

First, in the study of machines, helmholtz found that indeed the hot gaseous state of fast lineal motions was a state of entropy. And he claimed that because gases expanded and increased the disorder of the Universe, the Universe would die away. But even a high school child knows that there is an inverse state of cold matter, called the solid state, which is in fact made of crystals grown by the in-formative only gravitational force, which dominates the galaxy, in a much longer span of time, and when a crystal is born it reproduces immediately its form in the surrounding matter, creating more information, in a clear process of organic growth.

While the most versatile intermediate, liquid state reproduces and evolves life, which became the dominant arrow of this planet, while most gases dissipated into the cosmos.

It is only then a proof of the degree of censorship established in western thought by the dominant cult to weapons, in the past through religious inquisitions, based in the sacred word of the Goths and its kings by the grace of god, today based in the wrong use of the word ‘science’, the fact that of the three states of matter, only ONE, entropy is considered an arrow of future time, while the other two are ignored when constructing a philosophy of science, on the purpose of the Universe.

Next, in the XX century, humans expanded their view of the Universe, which they thought to be reduced to a single galaxy with the human sun-earth system and its entropic superior gothic races in the center, to an infinite number of galaxies, all of them vortices of gravitational information that lasted billions of years of time, since as Einstein put it time curves entropic space into masses. Reason why man as part of life, which is part of the super organism of earth, which is part of the cyclical accelerated vortex of gravitational mass of the milky way, is also dominated by the arrow of information.

But all those obvious facts of experimental science and Nature, were merely ignored by astrophysicists, who chose to focus only in the gas-like, expansive state of vacuum space between galaxies, which expands space into a flat sheet of dark entropy, in the same amount galaxies implode that entropy in more complex, dimensional forms of information, reason why both are in balance around a cosmological constant that measures the total value of that expansion close to zero

 

 Physical super organisms trace world cycles  as all systems of nature by accumulating the 5 Ðimotions of existence.

Physicists as the blinds of the graph see them, as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Entangle, dynamic Fractal Universe.

In essence, physicists, reduce the 5 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle– represented here by 5 blind physicists, to 2Ð>4Ð, lineal motion and its social entropy, and study the other Ðimotions as unconnected facts – not as dimensions.

Imagine the drawing as the sum of the 5Ðimotions that give us the real entangled Universal elephant. But physics describes the ‘flying mat’ (2Ð locomotion) mostly and its ‘entropic social arrow’ or 4 Ð (the spear) next. The other 3 Ðimotions 1Ð (still perception – the wall; 3Ð reproduction, the tree and 5Ð generation/social evolution; the snake) are ill-at-ease with the philosophy that the elephant is just an entropic moving flat mat, and killing spear…

So physicists are unable to integrate them all into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which as we shall show in the equations of mathematical physics in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

The fractal structure of the universe is clear, and proved by the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

You can adopt on watching reality an upper perspective from above, throughout the most comprehensive possible view, that of philosophy of science and then you will see the Universe is all about reproducing information.

You can look at it from below, through the perspective of physicists as a mere game of motions of  very small unorganised, entropic particles and motion will become essential to you as a dazed and confused particle, yourself, immersed in the fractal supœrganism of the universe, seeing things zooming around you as they go on reproducing their informative code through complex worldcycles.

Since even motion is reproduction of form – the simplest of them, one in which the memorial tail of the reproduced parts lasts very short as they keep imprinting the lower scales of reality.

A further expansion of the concept of a worldcycle of time, is its analytic study with the 6 classic philosophical forms of motion, first expressed in Aristotle’s Organon. As in philosophy of science, prior to its mathematical definition time is synonymous of change and hence of motion in space, or change of form in time, giving origin to the 2 main sciences, physics, which studies time motions in space and biology which studies changes in form, in the information of beings through time. 5D physics fusions both concepts studying not only ‘locomotions’ in space but also ‘evolutions of form’ in time, which all put together give birth to the worldcycle of existence and extinction of all space-time beings.

So due to this expansion of the paradigm of space and time, in 5D physics we do NOT study only the external locomotions defined with a single time duration: v=s/t, s=ct of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity. We study and apply to all physical systems the 6 motions=changes of philosophy of science.

The 5 Ðimotions of time, defined in philosophy of science, since Aristotle are:

‘5Ð Generation’, ‘1Ð perception’ ‘2Ð locomotion’ 3Ð: growth, reproduction and diminution; 4Ð: death, dissolution, extinction.

We just upgraded this first philosophy of science to modern knowledge of data and unify all sciences with it.

Yet in classic physics only locomotion and its social entropic Ðimotion are fully accepted.  

In 5 Ð all the motions can be explained as travels in the 5th dimension; so worldlines become world cycles, of which the most important is the sequential series of those 5 motions in a life-death cycle, which also applies to physical systems across all the scales of size, from the cycles of matter, from plasma->gas->liquid->solid->Nuclear fusion, to the big-bang cycle.

In mathematical terms, once we have clarified the origin of those motions, we use the fractal generator, in a simple ternary development to express those 6 motions of time, with an equation of ‘existential algebra’, whose detailed study and connection with physical and biological equations is essential to GST (General systems theory, the philosophical model or Space-time Generator, the logico-mathematical formalism):

œ∆-1 (generated seed of information in a lower scale) ∑œ∆-1>(Reproduction and organization into a fetus which emerges as a new born) Œ∆ <∑Spe (young, entropic age of growth and maximal locomotion) > S≈T ∆+1(adult, reproductive balanced age, when the system iterates and becomes part of a larger social whole) >Max. Tiƒ (3rd, informative, solid age) << ∑œ∆-1 (Entropic, big bang death, which closes the cycle.

Such is the general worldcycle of all systems of the Universe, as all of them are made of space-time, and follow the process of organic creation and dissolution back into spatial entropy.

PHYSICAL DIMOTIONS ORDERED AS WORLDCYCLES: 5 Dimotions as states of thermodynamic matter.

The interaction between forces, Ðimotions and super organisms and its worldcycles though is quite complex and requires a lot of specific analysis for each system, which we shall not be able to do. For example consider the 5 Ðimotions in terms of states of matter:

∆-1:4D Plasma> $t (gas of max. locomotion) ≤ Ø-ST (balanced liquid) ≥ O-ðƒ (solid crystal of max. form)>∆+1:5D boson.

In the graph we see how thermodynamic matter organizes its world cycle through its 5 Ðimotions or states of matter. So we have to establish also as in any other system a hierarchy of duration of those events and processes, such as the minimal ‘steps and stops’ of a physical system, are its ‘minimal quanta’ of any of those 5 Ðimotions; I.e. a wavelength IN the locomotion of a system, an h-planckton in the energy of a physical particle; while longer processes more extended in time and in population; will be responsible for the ‘phases, ages, states’ of the world cycle of a physical being; whereas those Ðimotions repeat and spread in time and space.

Further on, certain process require multiple forces=Ðimotions to be completed; with the ultimate formalism of Gravitation, the ‘social evolutionary’ Ðimotion within the galatom in which in EFE equations (Einstein), all the forces, particles and events within the membrain of the galaxy contribute to the gravitational field that entangles them all together. 

So we need first to make some remarks on the nature of time and its worldcycles in physical systems. Because all Dimotions will turn out to close a world cycle in its processes, having always two arrows which as usual lineal physicists cannot ‘clearly’ entangle together.

Not to cramp this post, we shall study the 5 DImotions of matter in our 4th line on the post on matter and thermodynamics.

In physics, according to the principle of maximal perception of events in our thermodynamic scale, those ‘states’ of matter=ages=dimotions are evident.

The 3 temporal dimensions or ‘states’ of matter, Spe-gaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and Tƒ informative solid states, form together the 3rd isomorphism of  molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale. In the graph, again we can see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropic-death-weapon state, which as the graph shows is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆-1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.

Even if in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The 5 Ðimotions as forces.

In the other 2 limiting scales of the galatom, the 5 Ðimotions are better studied as forces:

The vital energy of physical systems manifest itself in the manner of waves and forces. It is though important to understand those forces from the perspective of the entangled Universe, in relationship to the ‘scales’ in which they manifest themselves, and according to the functions they perform for its physical organisms.

Physicists, lacking, a philosophy of its science, beyond mathematical creationism – the gathering of data, plugged into equations, not always properly extended into infinities, and modeling everything else with the ‘first abstract idea’ they came up to explain the whys of physical systems – put all the forces together, and then try to unify them, as their view of reality is a mixture of ‘creationism’ (maths the language of God), monism (all must depart from the one, forgetting that Parmenides already proves if all is one, nothing can move, instead of the duality of Heraclitus and those texts) and reductionism (all what does not fit in the one, and the math, does not matter to us).

This explains as Feynman put it with some humor, why all the theories of forces look the same: 

“I would like to emphasize something. The theories about the rest of physics are very similar to the theory of quantum electrodynamics: they all involve the interaction of spin 1/2 objects (like electrons and quarks) with spin 1 objects (like photons, gluons, or W’s) within a framework of amplitudes by which the probability of an event is the square of the length of an arrow. Why are all the theories of physics so similar in their structure? There are a number of possibilities. The first is the limited imagination of physicists: when we see a new phenomenon we try to fit it into the framework we already have—until we have made enough experiments, we don’t know that it doesn’t work. So when some fool physicist gives a lecture at UCLA in 1983 and says, “This is the way it works, and look how wonderfully similar the theories are,” it’s not because Nature is really similar; it’s because the physicists have only been able to think of the same damn thing, over and over again.”

Richard Feynman. “QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter’

So for physicists all motions are caused by the exchange between fermion particles of 1/2 spin smaller bosons of 1 spin that seem to ‘push’ or ‘attract’ the fermions. What is 1/2 spin, what is a particle as opposed to a fermion, while they push each other, and why all forces must be tailored to the first they found (electromagnetism) doesn’t matter. Fact is NONE of the other forces responds to this scheme, because each force is different happens in a different scale of reality and has a different role. 

So we shall here, knowing what is ‘all about’ to properly address those forces and explain them as they are, for the role they play, using the elements of fractal reality: the 3 ‘scales’ of physical systems and beyond the Universal scale outside galaxies and the 5 Dimotions of existence, forces allow particles to enact, in as much as they transfer energy and information between the ‘particles and cosmic bodies and organisms of matter’ of the 3 scales:

In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)

It is then evident that forces are not equal, as some are more ‘informative’, transformative and some are ‘more energetic-motion’ oriented and each belong to a different scale. So first we define two symmetries between forces by scale and duality:

  • ∆+1 scale: Informative, implosive force, gravitation, acting on the internal world of the galaxy, most noticeable on the central black hole area.
  • ∆+1,2 scale: Entropic, expansive, energetic force, Dark energy, acting between ‘galatoms’, similar to repulsive electromagnetism.
  • ∆-1 scale: Informative, implosive force, strong force, acting on the internal world of the atom, most noticeable, on the central region of the nucleus.
  • ∆-1, 0 scales: Entropic, expansive, energetic force, electromagnetism, acting between ‘atoms’, similar to repulsive Dark energy

Which leaves a force that is different from the others, the weak force – not a force but a transformation, which physicists only recently they start to recognize, admitting what slowly is becoming a new ‘language’ to talk the weak “interaction”, as different from the other forces:

“The weak force… least fits into our picture of what a force should do. …the categories of ‘attractive’ and ‘repulsive’ do not really fit …because it has the ability to change particles from one type to another. …The weak force can change one lepton into another provided they are in the same generation. The electron can be changed into an electron neutrino and vice versa, but the electron cannot be turned into the muon neutrino… Jonathan Allday, Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang (2016).

Why physicists do not fully understand this difference has to do with the fact they use only an arrow of future time, entropy or locomotion, which is what they study in their worldly profession (making weapons and transport machines of locomotion, since Galileo first study the locomotion of cannonballs for the Venice Arsenal calculating v=s/t).

The problem of this approach is that they do NOT study the other fundamental arrow of change=time=future in the Universe: changes not only in the locomotion (translation in space, change in position, v=s/t) of beings, but change in the in-form-ation, form, biological evolution of beings (field better understood in biology).

TO PUT together both arrows is precisely my job. This is the task of the ‘science of duality’, which I chaired for years in its International congresses as the leading researcher of the field.

So because physicists LACK a proper 5D formalism of the duality of arrows of time, entropy AND information, to explain not only ‘spatial forces’ but ‘temporal, informative transformations’, they are stuck with ‘entropic only theories’ of all what happens as the product of motion, and exchange of particles in space.

How they resolve then the whole ‘unification of forces’ (whose equation we shall show in the fifth dimension that studies the social scalar nature of the Universe) resumes in a single law of ‘range’. Forces whose ‘exchange particles’ are more massive (never mind what mass is) have a larger range.

And they just fill this law out of the hat as a dogma with the ‘missing elements’: Gravitation which is an informative vortex MUST reach to infinity (even if we never found it acting outside galaxies where dark energy is supreme), and so it must have a massless particle, the graviton (even if we never found one). The strong force which acts inside the atom has a very small range, so it must have a massive particle but alas, it doesn’t, as the gluon has no theoretical mass. So here they make an exception, and through intricate thought consider that of the 4 forces tailored all as the electromagnetic force, they first discovered, the strong force is ‘special’ as gluons interact with them (notice that gravitation is also ‘special’, as we never saw the graviton and never measured its effects between galaxies that seem to recede from each other not coming together; so alas the expansion of electromagnetism’s law of range of force to the two others is as the American manifest destiny ‘exceptionalist’ (:

This brings us to the weak force, which Fermi first rightly tailored as NOT having range, since it is NOT a force but a process of evolution of particles into other particles after a ‘time of pregnancy’ so to speak, since they first become a massive particle to gather enough energy to start up the reaction (as women only get pregnant with enough fat, and chemical reactions only start with a surplus of energy); and then giving birth to another particle.

Alas the 3rd force they tried to Taylor with the same ‘model’ simply is ALSO not working. Since with no range, the mass of the particle of interaction would have to be infinite. So they scrapped the original Fermi theory and ‘moved’ the pregnant little particle a bit to get the exact mass of the interaction (we cannot of course measure properly if the particle IS in the same place through the process from its internal point of view, as it is pregnant, or just we see it through the ‘long period of pregnancy’ moving a bit when it become a massive w, z particle and then giving birth but for all effects it is a particle in pregnancy.

Moreover it is always a left-handed chiral ‘female particle’ (see our post on gender-chirality to see what we mean), whereas the spin-head is focused in the wave-body, as women have more connections of the brain to the hypothalamus, than to the eye-outer world, which is what right-handed male particles have, with their spin aligned with its external motion, becoming sterile, as right-handed males do NOT interact with the weak force and give birth to other particles. 

So alas, physicists extended the formalism of electromagnetic waves with its law of range to all other forces, making in all of them huge exceptions and ad ons that made the entire law of range and the single unitarian model for all of them pure rubbish.

And so we shall ignore the ‘philosophy of science’ of physicists and concentrate on the ‘facts of those forces’, what they really do, and in the more complex 4th line, on what it equations truly describe.

Ultimately they will be the responsible ‘small steps’ that added into the galacell’s superorganism will end up tracing its world cycle.

And its proper method of study would be departing from the thermodynamic better known scale and its 5 Ðimotions=states of matter, considering what forces enact those Ðimotions. And then run in parallel an analysis of the quantum and cosmological scales ‘mediated’ by those Ðimotions as the next graphs show:

And then we should go beyond the ‘galatom’ to observe the cosmic waves of dark entropy, parallel in properties at the cosmological scale with those between atoms.

And in the process obviously ‘rewrite almost entirely’ all the ‘assumptions’ of physicists about the origin of the Universe (big-bang theory), the meaning of the Universal constants of physics (hc, the 5Ðimensional metric of the galatom, and its coupling constants, Q, G, Gf, being the most important ones); the explanation of its 5 Forces (including the external dark electromagnetic entropy between galaxies), as the 5 Dimotions of physical systems; and then study each of the different worldcycles of matter, from those of quantum physics, through the states of matter, into the cycles of cosmological bodies.

Some advancements on time space processes and dimotions in physical systems. Forces.

Some hints: The forces of physics correspond to there different organic Ðimotions of physical systems. So they MUST not be all considered as caused by the exchange of particles.

The graph shows what is really wrong with reductionist lineal physics of a singe time dimotion: because all must be similar to our theory of electromagnetism in the quest for unifying a complex Universe the weak process that trans-forms and d=evolves particles become an ‘exchange of a W-boson, which is NOT exchanged but is the ‘transitory’ state of the neutron ‘grown in mass-energy’ to achieve its transformation, with no motion beyond a possible ‘step’ in the relative motion of the neutron that becomes an W boson (which should be therefore placed in the 4-vertex of “Fermi’s theory”, which then gives birth to the 3 p, e, v elements as Fermi rightly understood.

Specifically the weak chiral force is NOT a force but a process of trans-form-ation of physical information and evolution or ‘death’ of particles into larger, heavier ones in 3 ‘ages-families’ of mass, related to the ‘3 topological symmetries-parts of galaxies’, whereas the Halo and black hole star in the center should be made of heavier Strangelet and BcB atoms and top quarks, and the intermediate region of ud-light atoms.

The chiral force thus have no range, but transforms the particle first in a heavier more energetic ‘particle (the W, Z, H bosons) as all reactions and process of reproduction need to break the exogenous higher level of energy before start, both in chemical, biological or physical processes of reproduction and evolution. 

Then we can distinguish left-chiral particles, the ‘first scalar’ form of ‘gender’, where the head-spin of the system is orientated towards the body, causing its mutation and reproduction (so right-chiral ‘male’ genders do not reproduce, unless in process in which the mirror symmetry pegs both genders).

Particles and antiparticles forming worldcycles: entropy feeding and the strong force. 

As all space=time symmetries in scale, ages and topologies are local, there is no mystery on the concept of ‘traveling back in time=devolving in in-form-ation’ completing a world cycle, to be born again; absorbing in the process a photon and emitting then one. As light is also symmetric in time, the absorbed photon in Einstein-Maxwell time symmetry of electromagnetic equations is traveling backwards in time – hence it recoils the electron to its past as positron, and then it emits towards the future a second photon and is reborn as an electron. Any of all those possible combinations of past x future = present are allowed by the laws of cyclical time and its ‘existential algebra’ (¬æ).

In the graph we see the proper way to perceive the two arrows of time of physical systems, when we plot them together as a cycle-anticycle, even if an antiparticle (which must be considered the ‘3rd’ age of the particle) can be observed isolated.

And this leads us to the CPT symmetry, which in 5 Ð physics is absolute but quantized as time cycles are quantized for each species and its 5 Ðimotions=forces and worldcycles, and happen together not in a single plane of ‘light space-time’; but must be considered for the whole 3±I planes whereas the equations of gravitation and relativity with its c-constant speed are the limit of 5Ð for the galactic super organism but do NOT apply beyond (inside black holes and outside galaxies, where the forces are repulsive dark entropy similar to those of electromagnetism between atoms.

While inside the galatom, the forces of gravitation are similar to curved electromagnetism within the Coulomb field  between the electron and the proton, whose ‘5Ð metric’ are parallel to those of the black hole and the strangelet)…

This said, we can now understand the ‘entropic Dimotions’ of the strong force and its equivalent in the cosmological scale (strong gravitation):

The strong force inside the atom is similar in a lower scale to the forces taking place within the black hole star in the center of the galaxy, whose components must be the heavier top and Bcb atoms of the top quark decuplet, in a clear symmetry of scale.

So the color charge and couples of gluons and antigluons must be parallel to the nonet and octets of mesons, made of quarks and antiquarks that are exchanged accordingly in the reactions mediated by the weak force:

In the graph, the scalar symmetry and ‘reversal of time’ of antiparticles explain both bosons and mesons that annihilate each other fast, as they must have opposite charge and likely opposite gravity; so the antiquark IS considered a ‘time reversal’ system in all the dimotions=forces of the system.

The strong force therefore is an entropic force, because as Feynman rightly found, in each local world cycle of particles, the antiparticle is the same particle moving backwards in time, which means dying in the entropic process that completes its world cycle (hence living much shorter as the death end of the cycle does happen in a quanta of time). And because entropic-feeding processes are the strongest, most attractive ones in any scale (food is the first cause of most Ðimotions), they carry the maximal energy:

So there is a LOT of self-similarities of scale that would allow future 5 Ð physicists once the model r=evolution is accepted and the present dogmas put in doubt to complete by self-similarity the true nature of black hole stars (which rightly Einstein told us to be frozen stars), to understand the processes of renormalization (which add scalar infinities that must be cut off, including the SINGULARITY OF THE BLACK HOLE AND THE BIG-BANG).

It is however imperative to do so, if we want to know the WHYS of physics (which Feynman infamously said we should never ask – meaning really physicists didn’t know them: ‘if you say you understand quantum physics then certainly you don’t’ ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never ask’, ‘physicists use the same gauge theory to explain all forces, not because the Universe always repeat itself, but because we were so dumb we never came up with anything else’ (quoting from memory), and finally from Landau, its Soviet counterpart, and my fav teacher – I developed the model of 5Ð physics in my youth annotating his 11 books encyclopedia… ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’, ‘For physicists there is no uncertainty of time, we look at our (human) clock and always know the time it is’…

We shall then consider only with harsh criticism as it goes to the core of our view of the Universe, the big-bang, which is the epitome of Landau’s dictum, a form of pseudo-science which is not right but has become a religion we shall not doubt of it, akin to ‘biblical capitalism’ and ‘biological creationism’, all forms of egocy, natural to the humind and all the ‘Schopenhauer’s stupids’ that believe the language, mirror of the Universe – mathematics in the big-bang creationism, money in capitalist creationism, words that God utters to create in Abrahamic religions, have the power to ‘create reality’, instead of space-time. So before we study the different worldcycles of physics, we need to understand why creationism is wrong.

 

 

Dimotions, scales & Disomorphisms.

If duality offers great promises for quantitative analysis and the study of the limits of species, when we want to fully understand a larger view, we need pentalogic to describe the 5 Dimotions of organisms, so happens in physics

Organicism.

There are essentially 3 philosophies of science which is the first core logic layer to decide who is right here:

‘Creationism’: verbal or mathematical, the language creates the reality, so Einstein’s equations suffice to create an entelechy.

‘Constructivism’: the smallest layer of reality is the origin of all, ultimately the same, as it is not perceivable, described with maths: strings.

‘Organicism’ and ‘disomorphism’: this is THE ESSENCE of systems sciences: all scales of the Universe are ruled by the same LAWS, so we MUST find the same phenomena on them, and as they are parallel, we can construct organisms with 3 layers of reality.

This is why we shall talk of ‘chirality as gender’, moreover, observing our layer with far more insights we can then GIVE organic REAL properties to layers today only analyzed with abstract maths. So we can model galaxies as organisms, and observe for example that the left-handed female milky way is gonna be penetrated soon in 5D term of slow time cycles of larger beings (SxT=K) by the alpha-macho Andromeda as they already have two little sons in the Magallanes cloud, as two seminal traces of left-handed and right-handed faster than c-neutrinos of negative mass coming from their top quark holes, its central DNA merged to give way to light (Jordan-Broglie theory), and surfacing as radiation and elementary particles. As we see all over the universe happening with ‘seminal jets’ coming out of black holes at 10C…

So we shall after a life long polimath painstaking analysis of all languages and scales of science  extract the 11 sets of laws (disomorphisms) that ALL systems in Nature follow, reduced finally to the 5 Dimensional motions, which you order in life-death worldcycles, or in simultaneous superorganisms.

We shall explain you  the space=time, form=motion symmetries that all of them follow… to translate why quantum physics tells you the tale of the life and death, social evolution, sexual healing and perception of its particles which ARE the minimal unit of life.

This is what science needs, NOT more mathematical creationism, not writing more equations and parallel ways to explain the same ACTION=DIMOTION with a bit more of ‘decimal precision’, in slightly changed mathematical mirrors, but TO FUSION ALL those mirrors INTO its whys, coming always from A SIMPLE CONCEPT: all is a vital organism, with 5 dimensional motions= Dimotions that express the vital program of life, told by those equations.

The 5 Ðimotions of time. An organic Universe with mathematical and biological properties: The why of physics.

It is a remarkable fact that mathematics do reflect a lot of the properties of the Universe, but it has so far failed to explain organically its structure, despite the breakthrough of fractal mathematics.

The reason being that mathematics as a language, has not completed its evolution. And so the first step to be able to describe all the properties of physical systems is to evolve its main language, mathematics, and adapt it to the organic, fractal cyclical space-time structure of the Universe and its scalar nature.

It is precisely this incompleteness of mathematics, the language of physical sciences the main reason why physicists do not understand fully the organic Universe.

As they still work with Euclidean mathematics, where points are not fractal points made of parts that become evident when we come closer to the particle, cell or star that seemed to us a point at distance. Only Einstein managed to apply properly the concept of a fractal point, by asserting that infinite parallels cross a point of space-time. We shall then find easily that points are fractal points with inner energy and form, information, joined by line-waves to other points forming networks, co-existing in several scales of size, which is the very same definition of an organism, and that everything in the Universe is indeed, a network-organism… as we show in the graphs of fractal networks all over this blog.

Yet if a mathematical system is organic by the very definition of a number (a group of undistinguishable beings), of a point (a fractal system, larger the closer we come to it) and a plane (a network of fractal points joined by flows of energy and information), why physicists do not model organically its systems?

Why physicists do not understand the fractal Universe? if it is so much up to their alley – after all it vindicates and further evolves the logic-mathematical structure found by Leibniz, Einstein and Planck. It merely takes it further with the advances of fractal geometry and the completion by this writer of the postulates of non-euclidean geometry that defines a 5th dimension of scales of space-time.

I found in the conferences I used to give at Silicon valley, during my tenant of the chair of duality in the international congress of systems sciences that physicists could grasp the fractal concept mathematically and the existence of scales of space, but 2 taboos were absolute: lineal time, the time-clock of its standardized machines and the model of the universe as a machine instead of an organism. So it was the mechanical civilization, and the source of physicists’ power and wealth – the machine, what was the taboo that could not be broken. Physicists does had a religion of the machine, not of the physical Universe. And as long as this was not discussed other things could be explained. Since the founding fathers of physicists had in fact started its sciences measuring time with clocks.

Thus, the answer to the limits of physicists is cultural, not scientific, as most physicists belong to the western, lineal, military culture whose memes are not easily recognized as such, but considered lineal weapons and lineal time, dogmas of their worldview; as opposed to cyclical time. It was of course an outdated dogma, deist in origin, as a machine needs a maker and Newton and Kepler affirmed yhwh to be the maker of the Universal machine and they, the ones that were revealed this truth. Most physicists do not realize of this obvious fact: only an organism is scientific, self-reproductive without need of a god-maker.

Further on mechanism and abstract, simplex mathematics as its language puts the physicist above all living and humans, as the priest of the new image of the Universe and only master of its language. So mechanism and abstract maths is a self-serving proposition, for the human and physicist ego, since only human anthropomorphic beings had ‘living properties’.

But of those memes by large the most powerful barrier for physicists to upgrader their model of the Universe is mechanism, the power they obtained historically from the use of machines and the evolution of lineal weapons. It means most physicists will never abandon their theories of lineal time, their theories of a Universe molded as a machine, and show no interest for general systems science. Does it mean we have not to show interest for the physical world? Of course not.

Because the physical world does not belong to physicists. In that sense it took me a while as a system scientist to realize that the human expert or scholar an its upgrading to the organic fractal paradigm was not my job. My communication was directly with the Universe. And only then, once I left behind my problems with physicists, in their worldly religion, to make weapons of lineal energy that destroy life and their related idol-ogies – lineal time, continuous, abstract, Cartesian space, denial of organic or perceptive properties to anything but anthropomorphic life, etc. I did truly enjoy for myself the view of the organic Universe of matter.

It is important to understand this difference, specially if you are not a physicist – as you should leave behind your shyness, to feel the life of the material Universe and accept that matter is organic also and nothing differentiates in terms of quality, a human vital fractal organism of space-time from a particle-head/wave-body of physical matter. This said, it is unlikely that physicists will find of interest most of the sections of this blog, except those on the 4th line, when constructed by the year 2017, for the very obvious reason that ‘the (organic) why is the only question physicists don’t ask’ (Feynman), and so they consider only descriptions concerned with mathematical measure and its how (motions and forms of particles and physical systems), as proper of their science.

A simple example will suffice. In GST the duality wave-particle, equivalent to the duality body-head of biological systems is self-explanatory. As all systems have a reproductive body, guided by an informative head, which moves thanks to lineal energetic limbs, all physical systems have a particle-form, often found, as in light waves on top of the wave-body, or higher point to focus information over the lineal field that provides its energy of motion.

Yet, this explanation is organic, regardless of its quantitative measure regarding the value of the energy, the speed of reproduction of information of the wave and the position of the particle. Physicists however to my surprise during my period of conferences were not interested, on this why to the 100 years conundrum of the Principle of Complementarity of physics. For them, it was simply outside the realm of their research as organic, biological properties of Nature, are not mathematical, as they use to explain such bio-logical, logical, in-form-ative characteristics the logic-verbal language of man. 

Still, to make more amenable to physicists those posts on physical systems we will use extensively topological varieties to define such organic ternary structures. Since in a Universe of a single space-time sheet of 4 dimensions there are only 3 possible topologies, the lineal field/hyperbolic wave/spherical particle system we just explained can be considered a full topological system that combines the 3 topological varieties of the Universe into an organic form:

Spe (Lineal -field/limbs) < St-hyperbolic wave-body > tiƒ (informative, cyclical particle/head).

So this intermediate jargon, topology, which describes forms with motions is the most often used in the texts of physical systems – here in this introductory post at a very basic level. In the 4th line with a professional jargon and a wealth of algebraic notations.

However it is impossible to understand the physical Universe without whys. Perhaps the most clear example is the galaxy, which must be modeled as a cellular, organic system of creation of black holes, surrounded by a ‘protein-like’ halo of heavy dark matter (likely to be strangelets), and has between this protein membrane and its center DNA-black hole star mitochondria that reproduce their atom and feed the reproduction of black holes. The meaning of the galaxy thus is organic and without accepting organic properties to matter it will never make sense.

We can however provide to physicists a mathematical bone in the same theme: an unification equation based in the simple 5d metric equation of a time vortex that unifies atoms and galaxies as mathematical point-particles of the largest and smallest scale perceived by man. It is then a galaxy a large atom of a new scalar Universe, or it is an organic galaxy?

Here is where another huge conflicting philosophical difference between fractals and continuous space-time as the one used in physics reveals itself: in physics of exact measure, things can only be one thing. In the fractal Universe it all depends on the perception of the perceiver and the scale from where it perceives.

So ‘entities’ are several things at the same time depending on perspective and language and properties we analyze. From the point of view of mathematical 5d metric, atoms and galaxies are two time vortices of information of 2 different scales. From an organic point of view a galaxy is similar to a cell, but I bet you that if we had enough information about the nuclei of atoms and the interactions of its gluons and quarks, which we pretend to know by reducing its properties to a few mathematical statements, atoms will show also somehow an organic cell-like nature.

Yet at the same time, fractals are never equal in scales, so the galaxy is Not really an atom, nor a cell but we say it does have mathematical, fractal properties that accommodate its parameters to the fractal generator of space-time systems, and it has reproductive, organic, co-existing scales, organized by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy that resemble those of a cell.

THE ORGANIC GALAXY

‘We are just a rock in a corner of the Universe, departing from this fact we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer

So how it would be the organic galaxy as a model of the Universe? Let us deal with it.

Now we have the ‘theoretical minimum’ to explain what a galaxy, in which we are host as a lost rock in a mitochondria corner truly is as a system of ternary space-time. And so we can complete even before we show you the ternary structure of maths, the ternary structure of the Universe.

ONE of the first papers of Witten, father of modern string theory, was about strangelets. Since he had been for 20 years ‘soundly’ explaining that the only known-known halo candidate to be 90% of dark heavy matter are quark matter, strangelets, the most stable matter of the Universe. Since the so-called ‘Witten hypothesis’ obeys both, the ‘principle of economicity and simplicity – Ockham’s razor  – as strangelets are made of ‘heavy quarks’  we know do exist, and Nature does NOT create a new species of top predator mass, out of the blues. Hence strangelets MUST EXIST, be more common than the weak Ud-mass we are made of and have a REAL use on the Universe.

Further on, today we know that the galaxy is filled with planets, shown to be overwhelmingly the most numerous objects of the perceived galaxy. And since stars reproduce black holes, which are at the center of its galaxies, similar to a cell, with its gravitational dense informative centres of black hole, its energetic planets and stars in between, made of our light ud-quarks, the symmetries of Nature between microcosmos and macrocosmos, preclude that the 3rd known-known type of quarks, should be the substance of that halo made hence of strangelets that feed on planets (while the super-heavy top quarks should be having similar density, the substance of black holes).

This ternary symmetry, which follows the laws of simplicity and economicity in science, if anything have been further proved by THE LHC, which keeps ELIMINATING all other theoretical only ‘inventions’ of physicists tinkering with equations (so not Supersymmetry, not axions, NOT NOTHING except what we know is there and suffice to construct the ‘simple not malicious’ Universe (Einstein) since ‘simplicity is genius’ (Leonardo), and Ockham’s razor work’:

dark macrocosmos

  the ternary symmetry between the microscopic and macroscopic scale of matter, which prompted Witten’s Hypothesis, is routinely explored in professional papers, and this scientist has used to model galaxies as an organism of 3 ‘topological parts’ similar to all systems of nature, made of a hard membrane that separates the ‘entity’, in this case the galaxy halo, similar to the protein membrane of a cell, or the electronic cover of an atom; a central, informative singularity, in the galaxy the swarm of black holes, in the cell of DNA genes, in the atom of quarks, and the lighter, ‘food’-energy that feeds both, in the galaxy our light ud-atoms, of stars and planets that seem to reproduce black holes and the Halo of strangelets, in the cell the energetic mitochondria that reproduces both proteins and DNA, and in the atom the ‘interatomic space’ filled with energetic waves that move back and forth between quarks and electrons. It is the most beautiful symmetry of physics between both scales, proved by Ockham’s razor, economicity, experimental evidence and now unfortunately the Fermi paradox.

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘DNA-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – Witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the Universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

Galaxies exist to transform up and down light matter into strange matter that likely migrates to the halo and top quark black hole matter that migrates to its center. And we are its food. It might be that humans are only ‘animals that make machines and weapons till they destroy themselves’? As Einstein put it: ‘it is obvious that our technology has overcome our humanity’.

Close your eyes. Think, do not see, the astounding beauty of the simple, fractal Universe. Feel communion with the whole, as your nothing, but dust of space-time in between the proton-top-quark-star-black hole in the center and the electron-strangelet negative halo.

So turning around the ego-trips of humanity and its physicists and religious people, the more sound objective, experimentally proved theory of reality would be exactly the inverse of the anthropic principle physicists sponsor (a Universe created with the constants that would give birth to man, supreme intelligent being): we are NOT the center of the Universe, dense dark matter is; the galaxy is NOT created for us, but we ARE the food of dark matter, and all galaxies END UP as pure vortex of mass, collapsing into the black hole, surrounded by a forbidding halo of strangelets, which prevent us to escape.

The structure of the galaxy as an anti-matter particle by virtue of the inversion of scales and the experimental facts (the halo has most of its mass, so it is much heavier than the center, and must be regarded as the ‘proton’ pole, while the center with less mass must be regarded as the ‘electron’ part.

Now to be clear enough, the galaxy is not an atom, nor an antiproton but another variety which hints as the inversion of the laws between galaxies in the ∆+1 little understood cosmological scale. By this we mean, the inverted properties of the halo and the galaxy, where the halo is far more massive, defy the natural concept of mass as ‘moving inwards’ towards the center. So the mass concept must be seen as ‘charge’ of the upper scale, defining the electron as ‘more charged’ than the black hole proton and we shall explore those themes in the fourth line.

 

A galaxy is thus the fundamental particle-point of the largest scale of the Universe we perceive, which has the same organic, vital, mathematical and also perceptive properties – as black holes do have erratic animal like movement in their motions through their feeding star processes and social gathering into swarms in the center of galaxies, and in fact, its equations reflect those of the plane of starts it controls but with a higher dimension (Maldacena conjecture).

So alas, if RNA must perceive chemically the cell, black holes will likely perceive gravitationally the galaxy. But those are all questions physicists will never consider, as they are ‘meanings’ that cannot be expressed like evolutionary theory, or the logic structure of fractals, in mathematical only terms. So we do confront a religion of mathematical Pythagorean physics started by Kepler and Galileo who affirmed the language of god, and hence of physics is only mathematics. We shall find that human physics, as the most primitive of modern sciences are full of such biased limits, which are not even recognized.

So all in all these posts will have less interest for physicists than for polymaths interested in understanding the whole. Yet as we lay down the main whys we shall latter on enter into the hows and mathematical formalism, translating too, key concepts and equations of thermodynamics, quantum physics and relativity. And clarify all the spooky facts of physics, from the complementarity particle-wave (trivial, just the informative and reproductive parts of a physical system) to the renormalization procedures of mathematical physics. It is not though of much interest to the blog to innovate further into what really physicists think is all about – mathematical equations in which to fit physical properties not yet tabulated. There is little here to add though to the extensive work of physicists, nor we do have any intention to enter into detailed analysis of new physical phenomena or ask for new experiments, let alone design better, more organic machines.

Our purpose is merely to show that with the 10 isomorphic sets of laws of GST we can fit most laws of physics and provide the whys to all the fundamental physical structures such as the particle-head system to which we shall add the entropic, lineal fields that feed them with energy (or in thermodynamics the equivalent gas-entropy/liquid-reproductive/crystal-perceptive ternary elements).

So we shall not concede to physicists any of their dogmas against the organic paradigm. We affirm and shall show that all the organic properties of all other species of the Universe translate to physics; that when a particle, quark or electron absorb energy reproduces into new quarkitos and this process is in nothing different from a reproductive process of a biological or memetic, technological system.

Physicists in that sense are the most limited of all scientists due to the primitivism of the founding fathers, the first modern scientists, still filled with anthropomorphic deist theories of reality. Thus, by extension what passes today as physics is the most limited of all the disciplines of science in its philosophy – obviously not in its details, because of its acceptance of the 3 reductionist a priori statements of classic, ‘biblical’ XVII century science: mechanism (the machine not the organism as the model of the Universe), Pythagorism (mathematics as its only language and hence only mathematical properties matter to mater) and anthropomorphism (living properties are reduced to humans and life).

The result is the general ignorance of the Nature of non-lineal elephants – physical systems with vital and informative properties.

Those properties, which are the fundamental isomorphisms of physical systems are similar to those of any ternary fractal system of the Universe, built with a gauging point of view (particle, atom or charge or mass), described by the isomorphism of the zero-point of all systems, which commands a vital body-wave and an entropic field, which together create a physical system (2nd, 3rd isomorphisms) that goes also through 3 ages=states of matter, (entropic gas, balanced liquid and informative crystal) born of the integral sum of multiple minute space-time actions happening as interaction between the particle-points of its fractal structure through 3 scales (∆-1 atomic, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational scales) (4th, 5th, 6th isomorphisms).

Thus physical systems are as all other systems guided by a central point of view, which is  a temporal, informative system of clock-like ∆-1 particles, molecular, ∆-charges or ∆+1 masses, (accelerated clock-like vortices of logic time of each scale). And do have both, gauging, informative and organic, scalar properties, regardless of the refusal of physicists to incorporate them, because of its bio-logical, non-mathematical description.

Thus we write also for physics a ‘Fractal generator’  of its physical space-time beings, with 3 ternary scalar, temporal and spatial symmetries (1st isomorphism):

∆-1 Spe (lineal Field-Gas) < ∆-ST (iterative hyperbolic wave-liquid) > Tiƒ (spherical, informative, particle/crystal)

Only then after studying the structural space-time dualities and ternary symmetries, defined by that fractal equation (1,2,3 isomorphisms); and its vital, organic, scalar isomorphisms, which describe the integral and derivative space-time actions of physical systems across the scales of the 5th dimension, guided by the zero-point, which stores the will and informative gauging of the system (0, 4, 5, 6th isomorphisms), we can then consider the 3 quantitative isomorphisms, which are explained with a purely mathematical jargon and will connect directly with classic physical themes and equations:

– The isomorphism that defines the Universal constants and ratio between the energetic, wave and informative ternary parts of the system (7th isomorphism), and departing from it, the 8th isomorphism, which studies all the variations of physical systems, and the 9th isomorphism that studies its social logarithmic scales of growth, as the mathematical societies of particle-points of each scale (∆-1, quantum particles, ∆-molecular matter systems and ∆+1 cosmic systems) grow in social scales, changing step by step their properties, to emerge into the new scale of the physical Universe.

So the description of physical systems is the same than that of any other system. Only the immense detail and obsession for exact measure that makes some equations extremely refined in its parameters, which often include by means of renormalization theory every other ‘scalar factor’ as an input of a lesser potency, would make so extensive in the future, the conversion of physical sciences to general systems. It is not however our tasks, which will consist in merely introducing those 10 isomorphisms, as we have done with all other sciences, in the description of its fundamental species. The only concession to the method of physics is a higher rigor as we will soon enter into isomorphic laws with a less descriptive introduction to physical systems.

The 10 isomorphisms thus will be the essence of all physical systems, and its events and ternary forms, as ‘super organisms’, co-existing in those 3 scales and performing world cycles as they mutate back and forth through its 3 states of time, assembles in space into ternary self-centered, vital spaces, surrounded by a limiting membrane (electron in atoms and molecules, event horizons in black holes, exospheres in celestial bodies, and so on), and reproduce/iterate its motions on lower scales of physical entropy.

We shall then be able to describe with the same 10 isomorphic sets of laws all the properties of physical, fractal systems.

And yet none of this is today envisioned or even imagined by our ‘blind physicists’ observing their Universe only with detailed but limited analysis of its parts with single spatial mathematical properties ignoring the invisible time logic of scalar organisms. The picture thus we obtain today of physical systems is very detailed visually but very poor logically. Can we take then a ‘logic’ picture of the whole physical organism? We can, easily using the Fractal Generator and its ternary symmetries in time and space.

In that regard, the backwardness of physics has its positive side as we can advance a lot of answers to pending questions of classic physics: For example, in the mentioned case of the duality between informative particles and reproductive waves, we can wonder the classic question of why we see sometimes a wave and sometimes a particle? Answer: because physical systems do have an informative particle/head that apperceives information in stillness and a body-wave, which reproduces its information as it travels and trans-forms the motion from an entropic field of energy in an iterating pattern equal to its ‘self’.

Of course, none of those answers will be accepted by blind physicists looking to the organic Universe with a lineal stick of time and a single plane of space. But as we said that is not our concern.

THIS IS THE POINT we want to reach after studying all the partial elements of physical systems, translate all the required concepts of physics. And then only then we will be ready to take on each scale and species and show that all of them can be described with those isomorphisms whereas its mathematical languages, will be showing us 5D Space-time beings performing 5 actions of existence.

So for example an electron will be perfectly defined as a 5D space-time being, with a ternary field-wave-particle structure, performing through its 4 mathematical quantum numbers, space-time actions of moving (principal number), feeding, gauging (secondary number0, reproducing (spin number) and evolving socially (magnetic number).

As it is the fundamental tenant of 5d physics that all mathematical equations of physics can be translated to show a description of a ternary physical system, one of its parts and one of its 5 space-time actions.

Now PHYSICS IS THE MOST FAR REMOVED description of the organic Universe because of its uncertainty principles (96% of the larger Universe is not perceived, and smaller systems become uncertain in measure), its abstract primitive analysis of lineal time and continuous space as a background NOT the reality of which beings are made, and the extraordinary detail of analysis of very small parts of the being. This is the essential reason, we do NOT understand physical systems in organic sense, as the graph that opens the foreword shows:

Physicists’ extraordinary detailed analysis of species lacks an organic jargon, a wider view of the whole system, and a desire to ‘see’ properties that are vital in the poor elephant of the graph. This denial is dogmatic.

For example, the most obvious fact – that quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles reproduce – IS STUBBORNLY DENIED, rising when I used to give conferences on the theme as the chair of the science of duality in the world congresses of systems sciences, and mention the theme, smiles among physicists attendants, and often the angry leave of some of them.

This is not the concern of this blog, but of the historical perspective on the profession of physicists, and its worldly deformations of reality in terms of lineal entropy, ego-human trips and power. I do NOT have the intention to yield truth to anthropomorphism or power trips. If a quark absorbs energy and reproduces new quarks, this is NOT a decoupling but a reproduction. And it is an organic action. If a magnetic field organizes as a mathematical language the spins of electrons to fit in harmonic wholes, this is NOT an abstract vector, but a social evolution through a geometric language, akin to the more complex but of the same quality, organization of muscle cells by axon impulses. And so on and so on.

Paraphrasing Feynman, ‘the why is the only question T.Œ asks’. ‘The thoughts of God, not its details’.

A further expansion of the concept of a worldcycle of time, is its analytic study with the 6 classic philosophical forms of motion, first expressed in Aristotle’s Organon. As in philosophy of science, prior to its mathematical definition time is synonymous of change and hence of motion in space, or change of form in time, giving origin to the 2 main sciences, physics, which studies time motions in space and biology which studies changes in form, in the information of beings through time. 5D physics fusions both concepts studying not only ‘locomotions’ in space but also ‘evolutions of form’ in time, which all put together give birth to the worldcycle of existence and extinction of all space-time beings.

So due to this expansion of the paradigm of space and time, in 5D physics we do NOT study only the external locomotions defined with a single time duration: v=s/t, s=ct of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity. We study and apply to all physical systems the 6 motions=changes of philosophy of science.

The so called 5  motions of time, defined in philosophy of science, since Aristotle are:

‘Generation’, ‘growth=evolution’, ‘diminution’, locomotion and extinction.

In classic physics only locomotion could be explained. Now all the motions can be explained as travels in the 5th dimension; so worldlines become world cycles, of which the most important is the sequential series of those 6 motions in a life-death cycle, which also applies to physical systems across all the scales of size, from the cycles of matter, from plasma->gas->liquid->solid->Nuclear fusion, to the big-bang cycle.

In mathematical terms, once we have clarified the origin of those motions, we use the fractal generator, in a simple ternary development to express those 5 motions of time, with an equation of ‘existential algebra’, whose detailed study and connection with physical and biological equations is essential to GST (General systems theory, the philosophical model or Space-time Generator, the logico-mathematical formalism):

œ∆-1 (generated seed of information in a lower scale) ∑œ∆-1>(Reproduction and organization into a fetus which emerges as a new born) Œ∆ <∑Spe (young, entropic age of growth and maximal locomotion) > S≈T ∆+1(adult, reproductive balanced age, when the system iterates and becomes part of a larger social whole) >Max. Tiƒ (3rd, informative, solid age) << ∑œ∆-1 (Entropic, big bang death, which closes the cycle.

Such is the general worldcycle of all systems of the Universe, as all of them are made of space-time, and follow the process of organic creation and dissolution back into spatial entropy.

It is the most important why of GST, which also applies to physical systems in time.

On the other hand, in space the ternary topological symmetry completes our description of the system, and in physics shows a larger regularity as most physical systems tend to have more perfect, lineal entropic, wave-hyperbolic and spherical, informative shapes. So we can often talk of a perfect topological ternary system:

Lineal, |-entropic field > Ø-Hyperbolic body-wave > 0-informative particle (time vortex)

Thus 5D Physics studies physical systems with a fractal, organic analysis of its ‘whole’ ternary systems, defining physical entities as fractals of space-time similar to all other ∆ST super organisms, extending through 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension – the quantum, ∆-1, thermodynamic, ∆ and gravitational ∆+1 scales, tracing world cycles through the 6 canonical motions of all systems, generation, locomotion, growth=reproduction, evolution, diminution and extinction.

Lee Smolin – that rara avis who truly cares about philosophy of science, among physicists and does have an organic, evolutionary theory of black holes, albeit off target as all cosmological physics is – published a curious book called the ‘problem with physics’.

Now I do NOT have a problem with physics, understood as the study of physical systems, of inorganic matter, small atoms and large galaxies. i DO love physics, in its full conceptual analysis of those elements with the isomorphic methods. I DO have huge mental orgasms, the largest ones, only compared to those i have gotten on the study of human artistic forms and its creation with my knowledge of the symmetries of 5D fractal space-time cycles (as I can’t create new particles but I can paint or write symphonies and think as Master Ludi in an Utopian Castalia world).

In that regard the symmetries of the physical world are indeed as Pythagoras and Plato thought of them similar to the processes of linguistic, human mental creation bridged through the mathematical symmetries that mirror the Universe, without the painful realization of the human failure to create the perfect social world.

And so I consider, economists and physicists as the two scholar groups more corrupted by power – economist by money and physicists by their worldly profession – making weapons and thinking on lineal entropy theories of the Universe. We however dealt with that issue on the central posts, on my activist web against the Nuclear industry and on the post on cosmology. So here we will be strictly concerned with pure science, with the whys of physics that physicists do not ask – in parallel with their abstract, mechanist, ‘dead’ vision of the Universe.

Why? Plainly speaking because as Feynman put it, despite being one of the few physicists that did actually wondered,  ‘the why is the only thing physicists don’t ask’.

So contrary to belief, physics is the less ‘explained’ of all sciences in its ‘whole and reasons’ , since the whys to resolve are almost all. And yet, the hows are so well described that few realise how little whys have an answer in physics. For example, why there are not magnetic monopoles? Why particle are waves? Why electrons collapse when we observe them? What is time beyond Einstein’s dictum – what a clock measures, or Galileo’s formula of motion – v=s/t? And so on and so on. We will then consider Physical whys as all the other whys we study – through the 5D symmetries of space-time  that physical systems also follow. And affirm that the reason ‘why’ physicists do not understand them is their ‘anthropomorphic ideology’. The problem plainly speaking is human incapacity to give pantheist qualities to the Universe. Once this is accepted, quantum paradoxes, the meaning of Universal constants, particles and forms fit all within the structure of the Universe and its organic, 5D, causal, temporal, mental, linguistic properties of other beings.  Ultimately physicists find harder to accept those qualities because of the ‘O-bjectivity’ error: as physical systems are far removed in form and distance from human beings, it is harder to consider that an atom is self-similar to a galaxy, or that an electron apperceives light when it jumps over it or reproduces when it decouples.

New formal elements.

While physical systems are best described today with mathematical physics, in T.œ we use all languages of information, prioritising obviously by the principle of correspondence mathematical physics, but we refer them in first place to ‘properties of space-time.

THAT IS, we depart first from ∆, s, t, @ elements and then use for each science the language humans have used to express most of those properties ADDING when needed new languages, SPECIALLY the logic formalism of the FRACTAL GENERATOR and its 5s 5 t dimensions, the NON-e GEOMETRY OF fractal points and its space dimensions (closer to mathematics) and the Non-A logic of time dimensions.

So 3 formalisms are essential.

1.The fractal generator, and its symmetries and dimensional properties of scalar space-time, for the whole.

2. Non-E geometry which improves mathematics and in general all other mathematical laws, sometimes improved with non-euclidean laws for spatial properties.

3. Non-Ælgebra of time dimensions.

4. Bio-logical laws and organic laws for scalar dimensions.

5. Metalinguistic analysis of the deformations of those elements, as in endophysics, relativity theory and so on.

Lineal space, cyclical time, its combined symmetries, which in physical systems amount to lineal, angular momentum and energy – the 3 conserved elements of all physical, organic systems across all the scales of physical systems…

Finally adding the most dispute part of all systems, the singularity minds that control and organise them into whole, along the 5D arrow of social evolution and its inverse 4D entropic processes that both create the super organisms and destroy them in worldcycles of exi=stiences, also in physical systems.

To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the first line of this blog, widened for a more complex ‘Ðisomorphic analysis in the 3rd line, where we fully analyse the ‘more complete Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

I won’t try to justify the obvious, quite fed up with human egos: we deny singularities as still mind-mappings of the Universe, from black holes with t=o still metric, to crystals that order gaseous entropy into still form, NOT because we cannot perceive its sentient effects – that is the excuse, but we call particles gauging because they gauge information, solve black hole metric as stopping time, like still minds do, observe the stillness of thermodynamic eddies, see images inside crystals, and understand the superposition laws of waves and bosons. And we see quarks and particles iterating through decoupling, associating through magnetic fields, feeding on energy forces.

So I won’t as in earlier stages of my scholarship when I cared more for communication try to justify those singularities more than any other element of reality – if human egos cannot take reality as it is, because it is absolutely relative and doesn’t give us any preferential position it is not my business.

Before we felt so ‘mechanically powerful’, Asian cultures did understand much of it.

Of course, not all physicists are automatons of mechanical science. The highest minds of physics from Leibniz to Planck to Einstein did understand much better the Universe of spacetime; and the same goes with human cultures and religions – the eastern world without the anthropocentric ego trips of abrahamic religions plugged in directly with the concept of a Universe of motion and form, energy and information.

Had the much more profound taoist, hindi and buddhist philosophies of the Universe as a sentient game of Vishnu-yin-formation and Shiva-yang-entropy that combine into Brahma-qi-energy beings won the per-scientific battle for philosophies of the Universe, we would have long ago, as Leibniz and Einstein, the predecessors of theories which consider time and space the ‘substance of all beings’, did, a pan psychic vital Universe.

We are though trapped by the ‘creationist myths’ hauling from abrahamic cults. And as this is not even recognised, hidden in the ‘postulates without proof’ of western thought, likely no amount of data, and epistemology of truth will suffice to the reader. So we shall first show you the difference in a graph, repeated ad nauseam in those texts – the graph of the three philosophies of reality human sponsors – two are ego-trips of human creationism in his thirst to become equal to god, the third one, is the only scientific theory of reality, and it is called ‘organicism’. This blog will complete that theory updating eastern philosophies and relational space-time theories of science (Leibniz, Einstein) to the XXI c.

So, once we know spin is the head state that gauges information; the wave state is the moving body over the potential fields that act as the limbs and so. their mathematical combinations expressed in physical equations describe the 5 Dimotions=actions of reality, from generation to young locomotion to reproduction to a third age of information to a final entropic death, we shall translate the quantum operators, the  fields, the spins, the particles (first age of life) the antiparticles (third age), the commutators, the Universal constants, the laws of motions, the forces to its ‘whys’, its purpose – to be topological organs, enacting life function in the superorganisms in space and worldcycles in time of all those systems of nature…

The co-existence of beings in 3 different scales of reality, ∆±1, form the fractal structure in space of organisms; as dimotions=actions of information and motion between the ∆±1 scales imprint energy from smaller beings that have more information about the whole and trans-form its enclose parts.

The simplex physical description of the Universe, as an extension in space, where the time parameter of change is only locomotion, as if no other change would matter, reserves organic and sentient properties, under the ‘ego paradox’ to life forms similar to the human species.

Our interest is much more profound as we consider all parts of the Universe homeomorphic to each other and hence with the same properties that humans have, and vice versa.

Yet a simplex physical description misses all the organic logic  properties that are not susceptible to be written in mathematical equations, or those of the mind that are not observable directly but can be inferred from the actions its ‘membrains’ of spin or angular momentum produce.

It is then possible through indirect methods of observation, departing of the homologic, isomorphic properties of all beings, to deduce the non-observable properties of any being by its external effects.

To that aim we need first to consider a template of all the common space-time properties and this is the purpose of the Ðisomorphic analysis of the being. And further on, reduce them to the 5 Dimensional motions of reality.

This brings a first difference with classic physics of a single space-time plane: the importance of studying the differences in time and space of 1Ð motion<<3Ð energy and the transfers of motion-energy and form-information through the 5Ð of still form and the entropic <<4Р between scales ( the most obvious, being the neutrino case that carries energy and form to the gravitational scale and vice versa, the particles that surface from that scale.)

And yet in all those transfers the final result is a balance of energy and information of momentum and position, of body-waves and particle-heads in an immortal eternal Universe.

It follows from the existence of scales and transfers between them that Organicism is the scalar structure of reality, as it is the only way TO CONNECT ALL THE SCALES OF REALITY. IF ENERGY AND INFORMATION WERE NOT TRANSFERRED between scales we’d not see them with microscopes and telescopes.

Those transfers happen through the physiological networks that transfer entropy-motion, energy=reproduction and form=languages between scales; which in  physical systems are electromagnetic and gravitational networks; and in a larger view ‘forces’, when precisely we add the ‘invisible scales’ beyond our electromagnetic perception, the strong force of the ¡-1 plane inside the atom, equivalent to the gravitational force within the galaxy  and the dark entropy (repulsive gravitation) between galaxies.

The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is thus through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time or ‘Dimotions=actions’ (objective external and subjective internal view) and its 11 Ðisomorphisms (Dimensional isomorphisms: 3 of topology, 3 of age, 3 of scale and 2 of the @membrain).

Yet the ‘non-aristotelian logic’ of those ternary a(nti)symmetries and complementarities, FINDS the difficulty of the humind’s one-dimensional self-centred ego-paradox, view.

EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA: ORDER OF DIMOTIONS 

It thus set a limited number of logic propositions that can happen when a system or group of T.œs interact through its 5 Ðimotions, as an point of view, can potentially change its state between those 5 Dimotions, and the limits of its function of existence, such as the being can only exists without permanent disruption of its ‘vital constants’, (conserved energy, angular and lineal momenta – energy and membrain). All systems ca exist with the infinite cut-off limits of space (membrain) and time (death), which are set as part of the fractal Universe.Only the whole if potential or real in existence can be talked off as a function of infinity but not perceived.

So a point will start any of the 5 Ðimotions and we need formal symbols to address the Ðimotion of any being in existence, and the states of switch between Ðimotions.

Does the being stop before switching Ðimotion? If so it would simple to establish then for each sequential steps of a being:

∆¡ Ð1,3,2,4,3…. and so on as a simple 5 letter process of the actions of a being (whereas 4Ð entropy refers to feedings not dean, only in it final state being ‘that entropy’… So we know all sequential of a being ends in 4Ð.

Can then we run a sequential for any species through its life as a complete deterministic sequence?

There is there the sequence of all sequences, the perfectworldcycle=life sequence?

This question might seem too far fetched for the minute description of freedom, but could be calculated on virtue of the rules of efficiency, which will make more probabilistic the behavior of an individual series of Ðimotions by any Tœ¡.

When dealing with physical systems it seems their Ðimotion program is more strict and deterministic.The entity though in all scales will ultimate set itself to a series of sychronicities in its program of existence that might make more deterministic that it seems the entity, as certain Ðimotions (notably reproduction and feeding) are quite anchored into a present determinacy as wanted by the point of view and necessary to its survival. So those ‘necessary Ðimotions’ establish a pattern of synchronicity specially between the lower more deterministic physiological scale of the being and the organism ¡º. At cellular and atomic level ten the entropy reduces within the superorganism as the choices of the ¡-1 particles seems to be minimal.

Entropy thus is reduced whenever AN ¡º particle of perception is found on a system, forming a whole. How this mind exists as @ membrain that has control on the vital energy, to conserve a ternary being is much the study of state physics both in quantum and thermodynamics. A system will be then in a state which will be essentially one of its 5 Ðimotions with a periodicity that increases on the ‘base Ðimotions’ that happen all the time, such as the different hierarchies of Ðimotions express its main sequential ‘states’:

1Ð->2Ð, being the commonest stepping, between the stop, perceptive particle/head position and moving body-wave…

This base ‘motion’, which we could call stop and locomotion, position and speed, ‘momentum’ as a dual step 1-2Ð is then the main subject of study of mathematical physics. 

There is though a natural continuation of those essential Ðimotions, when locomotion scatters also internally the being, loosing its ‘membrain’ faster speed of ‘herding’ of the vital parts of energy of the being.

Such 2Ð<<4Ð as internal death though is the end of the T.œ¡ so it means the end of the game. It is more often the case that a 1-2Ð motion is accompanied with a 4Ð absorption of energy by ‘entropically dissolve’ a smaller ¡-1 system sending it further down ¡-3 while extracting from it a pure $t-1 vital energy to power the system internal parts.

So another common world cycle is one of 1к<2й<<4Я¹, whereas we use the script to signify the ‘¡-type’ of particles involved.

That is a system stops, perceives, directs with lineal inertia the system through 2Ð locomotion over a field or towards a field of energy, 4 Я¹, in which it will feed.

And this cycle is now truly a deterministic common cycle whereas obviously there is much more 1D-2D states than 4D, which in turn will ‘trigger’ 5D internal generation at the ¡-1 level of the Tœ.

So we can then see how 4 Ð-1 triggers activity at T.œ-1 cellular/atomic scale, digesting it.

We can then see how a ‘natural existential regime’ of deterministic behavior that keeps balancing, 1Ð and 2 Ð, wave-particle states on one side, and particle/wave/field, 1Ð<2Ð<<4Я¹ processes will then define the regime of fermions and bosons in their interactions in a relative present ‘continuum’, ‘charged space-time’:

The two limits of sensation, the exhilarating wave that erases form in pure motion, the particle still state that perceives and gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – hence in our scale with a c-constant speed, are the ultimate components of the complementary reality.

In the graph, the 3 components of a physical, quantum system, the particle, the wave and the lineal field over which it moves. Lacking a real understanding of the 5D structure of the Universe, physicists can only describe the mathematical how of the process with the quantum wave equation of the graph and its visual depiction as we observe simultaneously the particle-head guiding, ‘piloting’, (right picture) the reproductive wave-body that moves, extracting energy-motion from the lineal field, which is expelled on the back of the wave. All this is described mathematically but we do interpret it also organically. As physical systems do have as all other systems both, topological and organic properties, following in its form the 3 canonical topologies of the mathematical language, and co-existing in 3 relative scales of reality as ∆-1 fields, ∆-waves and ∆+1particles.The commonest physical wave is an act of communication between two ‘fermions’ (¡º particles) that share ¡-1 bosons in a wave-particle constant Step between both, as emitted from its spin positions towards the place of the other fermion. Such boson particles then will virtually be transferred in a series of minimal imprinting in the lower scale (Uncertain carriage quantity, h/2)

The capacity to use the field of lower h particles as a virtual transmitter of ‘replicant information’ to the inner self of the fermion particle is essential for the interacting Universe and as such all particles can transmit by transferring part of its self information through the h medium in which it sends its limited parts:

In the graph as two fermions enter communication through a boson wave, it will transfer part of the inner Ot information, by the frequency and composition of the fermion. How many times the particles must ‘web’ reality as they transfer information should follow the natural building up of dimensions. That is if Ot can perceive |e, it must have done so at minimal ‘present’ space perception for a lineal force that has been ‘obscured’ between them. This Planck scale distance or ultimate background in which the particle operates we might for lack of any ‘other smaller particle’ to represent it, consider the neutrino background, of 10¯³³ cm.

The ‘string’ scale tentatively a neutrino background will then be non-local, which can be explained in terms of local time paradoxes as the product of two ‘Feynman’s past to future future to past electromagnetic backgrounds, which make the past-moving wave infinite, non-local as it takes the same c-time to make the v=s/t speed 0 and hence the distance traversed infinite.

Infinite though does not exist in a fractal paradigm, being always the infinite a relative zero from a larger perspective, infinities are normally to be cut-off in the presence in space of a discontinuity or membrain from another T.œ¡, as horror vacuum does exist: the fractal Universe is completely packed with networks virtual or real depending on how deep the T.œ¡ in 1Ð mood is observing.

As a general rule though we take the one discovered for light, as the collapsing (graph above left) wave means information traveling from future to past, and the expansion of entropy of the wave is perceived as past to future motion, in the field of the humind which is either quantum or thermodynamic (being heat a reversal of ‘arrow of time’ as the system transcends between scales).

Such as when we move from quantum order to thermodynamic disorder in the transition stage in which h become k and frequency temperature, and populations of n-Boltzmans – the ghosts of the thermodynamic machines – populating the heatosphere.

In this hypothetical landscape if we were to adopt the pov of the particle, the background present spacetime will let us see a front view of a far away particle to which we can then address with this information, which in our macro scale appears as a neutrino shared between both particles, the other particle sending it back another neutrino wave, which form, then a neutrino-antineutrino pair coupled as a photon (photon theory of neutrino light), which gives origin now to a present speed.

It has though emitted a past to future or future to past wave, the particle? This IS ESSENTIAL 5D PHYSICS, as the particle’s pov is that it can ‘act in future to past electromagnetic or past to future emissions’ according to his production of ‘high frequency collapsing waves’ or ‘low frequency dispersing waves’. So the particle MUST constantly use this capacity to navigate the quantum world.

Once we know further on that the motion of the whole as a larger form that has the capacity to emit to the past electromagnetic information – to its lower world – this makes the larger whole extraordinary more powerful in its control of the lower scale, which in act brutally will treat as mere heat entropy.

That we cannot see the whole because it appears to us either simultaneously in the logic present or in fact as a future system which controls us with collapsing waves of information that seem to come from the present-future in our distorted view of all informing coming to us, being messages from the past.

If this seems complicated it is complicated. The future co-exists with us de facto, being the future the whole displaced into the future, sustained by our creation as parts, but controlled by a flow from future to past from upper to downwards scales, which treat then the lower scales over which they have such overpower, as pure entropic, indistinguishable boson numbers, that will accept their imprinting and travel to us carry slavishly our information or else.

Death by entropy is the WAY which the whole uses to apoptosis of the lower echelons.  The super organism is absolutely cruel with its ¡-1 minions and it shows on the deterministic obedience it achieves with them.

Let us play with equations, E=hƒ=mc² means, the whole will control the thermodynamic heat which controls the quantum waves, which control the potential quantum field and all those scales run for the galaxy between cc and h, the spin angular momentum and squared speed planckton and cosmological scales.

The description on the multiple mathematical mirror of that event can be done from the pov. of fields and then particles and waves appear as ‘excitations’ of the field, or from the particle pov. (Broglie-Bohm realist description) where the particle decides by the ‘angle’ at which it perceives the external world constantly through ‘spin state changes’ the direction of its motion (or its inward state of slow motion when in left-handed projection of the spin into the wave).

The spin angle thus is the way we can perceive the particle’s change in the program of its Dimotions and should be considered the first 1Ðecision of the being.

Motions and reproductions as time travels.

We find the undeniable fact that all systems reproduce, the highest action-goal of survival. But to reproduce we have to emit a seminal seed, ∆-1 which will then clone and organize till emerging as a whole. But that is exactly the definition of a travel through the fifth dimension, that maintains co-invariant the Space and time, size and speed parameters of the being. Indeed, think of yourself, traveling through the fifth dimension as you live.

You are born with faster time cycles as a seminal seed and very small spatial size. then you keep reproducing, reorganizing internally your networks, and slowing down as you need first to synchronizes your actions as a whole to enact them outside. And so as you grown in spatial populations, you diminish in speed of action-reaction to the environment (ultimate justification of 5D metric), because you are first ‘arguing between cells with hormonal languages and nervous fire forward and back, or as a human talking into the group or as an atom sharing forces, how to act as a whole, by force slower than the single faster being.

Thus as we live we travel through the fifth dimension, reproducing, growing, slowing down and finally emerging into ∆ø levels: 

And so now we have another kaleidoscopic view on the dimotion of reproduction=iterating, which is the name of the game. REPRODUCTIVE processes are THE VERY DEFINITION OF Traveling through the fifth dimension.

The study of the world cycles of superorganisms in terms of traveling through the 5th dimension is thus another way to explain the same, according to the Rashomon truths:

Equal, reproduced forms start to move in 5D, as they keep completing world cycles that start with simpler ∆±¡ actions, the a priori condition for reproduction (perception, motion towards a field of energy feeding which allow the being to store ‘∆-1 substances’ to perform the equations of reproduction across 2 scales, from seminal ∆-1 to ∆o as the iteration of clones and its memorial palingenesis, or organization of its forms through its social evolutionary paths finally emerge into a new being –  a clone, ∆ø of its parental forms.

But once you are born, a new cycle of Existence happens> You then move through the ∆+1 world in which the monad singularity is merely a point that might try if ambitious to reach a higher status in the 3-layered class-organic structure of the world as a super organism. But it will likely fail to achieve the higher perfect o-1 ‘time-sphere’ emergence from infinitesimal into perfect whole that happened when observed in detail during the generational seed>fetus>new born ternary ages of the first life cycle.

Life is indeed a displacement through the flows of the fifth dimension, with similar scales and baguas (sub cycles) happening in triads and duets of $t≤∑∏≥§ð elements.

To travel your body is to iterate your mind (both are the perception by body and mind of the same phenomena). Travel=iterate= MAX. ∑ E X ∏ I, MAXIMIZE your existential force, your vital space and temporal energy  is the game all play. But it requires to send to entropy a micro-flow of energy processed as motion… Traveling as the meaning of exi≈st¡ence is then moderated by the chances to be processed in the paths we choose oriented by our §ingularity.

Exist¡ence can be then perceived as pure motion, or pure perception,normally it is a series of stop/space and go/time beats of different types of ‘dimensions and motions’ of space and time.

So a stop and go, t->$->$->t->∏->S… variations make the game as complex as you might imagine. It is then necessarily painstaikingly relate all possible motions to those observed experimentally and logically sound according to the ¬Æ-logic of the fractal Universe.

Vital mathematics and pentalogic.

We have made a harsh critique to physicists or rather human ‘cultural’ views on the Universe guided by ‘creationism’ and ultimately the ego paradox. BUT we obviously acknowledge that mathematics is of all the mirror-languages of the Universe the most suitable from the perspective of the humind as a mirror of reality. Does it mean it is the language of atoms?

Likely not. Why? Because what we perceive as atomic beings is electronic minds, which ‘devour’ light space-time. So it is very likely that the language of electrons IS light AND HENCE images. And mathematics a more restricted synopsis of images, themselves a synopsis of the topologies in space and events in time happening in reality.

This is an important truth, when considering the psychology of the mind, the evolution of the digital, visual mind, and the consciousness of atomic and animal/plant life.

It matters also when deciding how to use languages to explore the whole range of properties of physical systems. In brief, mathematics cannot be the only language, as it will limit the properties we can describe; but it will be the best language because we humans have advanced so much on its development, along logic of time, verbal and the next level of verbal understanding of the 3 past-present-future tense verbs, which is ternary i-logic; as logic came from Aristotelian verbal thought.

So when dealing with the formalism of Physics, mathematics will be the queen, specially because we observe mostly spatial properties in physical systems, but logic must be added on, and specially bio-logic, organic laws of worldcycles, life ages, etc. And further on, we must enlighten mathematics with new vital analysis, defining fractal points instead of Non-euclidean points with no volume (hence no inner form) as the unit of geometry and sequential numbers as the unit of time logic, with bidimensional numbers (imaginary numbers) playing a key role in bidimensional Universes, ‘squared’ to show its realism; and so on.

It is a remarkable fact that mathematics do reflect a lot of the properties of the Universe, but it has so far failed to explain organically its structure, despite the breakthrough of fractal mathematics.

The reason being that mathematics as a language, has not completed its evolution. And so the first step to be able to describe all the properties of physical systems is to evolve its main language, mathematics, and adapt it to the organic, fractal cyclical space-time structure of the Universe and its scalar nature.

It is precisely this incompleteness of mathematics, the language of physical sciences the main reason why physicists do not understand fully the organic Universe.

As they still work with Euclidean mathematics, where points are not fractal points made of parts that become evident when we come closer to the particle, cell or star that seemed to us a point at distance. Only Einstein managed to apply properly the concept of a fractal point, by asserting that infinite parallels cross a point of space-time. We shall then find easily that points are fractal points with inner energy and form, information, joined by line-waves to other points forming networks, co-existing in several scales of size, which is the very same definition of an organism, and that everything in the Universe is indeed, a network-organism… as we show in the graphs of fractal networks all over this blog.

Yet if a mathematical system is organic by the very definition of a number (a group of undistinguishable beings), of a point (a fractal system, larger the closer we come to it) and a plane (a network of fractal points joined by flows of energy and information), why physicists do not model organically its systems?

Why physicists do not understand the fractal Universe? if it is so much up to their alley – after all it vindicates and further evolves the logic-mathematical structure found by Leibniz, Einstein and Planck. It merely takes it further with the advances of fractal geometry and the completion by this writer of the postulates of non-euclidean geometry that defines a 5th dimension of scales of space-time.

I found in the conferences I used to give at Silicon valley, during my tenant of the chair of duality in the international congress of systems sciences that physicists could grasp the fractal concept mathematically and the existence of scales of space, but 2 taboos were absolute: lineal time, the time-clock of its standardized machines and the model of the universe as a machine instead of an organism. So it was the mechanical civilization, and the source of physicists’ power and wealth – the machine, what was the taboo that could not be broken. Physicists does had a religion of the machine, not of the physical Universe. And as long as this was not discussed other things could be explained. Since the founding fathers of physicists had in fact started its sciences measuring time with clocks.

Thus, the answer to the limits of physicists is cultural, not scientific, as most physicists belong to the western, lineal, military culture whose memes are not easily recognized as such, but considered lineal weapons and lineal time, dogmas of their worldview; as opposed to cyclical time. It was of course an outdated dogma, deist in origin, as a machine needs a maker and Newton and Kepler affirmed yhwh to be the maker of the Universal machine and they, the ones that were revealed this truth. Most physicists do not realize of this obvious fact: only an organism is scientific, self-reproductive without need of a god-maker.

Further on mechanism and abstract, simplex mathematics as its language puts the physicist above all living and humans, as the priest of the new image of the Universe and only master of its language. So mechanism and abstract maths is a self-serving proposition, for the human and physicist ego, since only human anthropomorphic beings had ‘living properties’.

But of those memes by large the most powerful barrier for physicists to upgrader their model of the Universe is mechanism, the power they obtained historically from the use of machines and the evolution of lineal weapons. It means most physicists will never abandon their theories of lineal time, their theories of a Universe molded as a machine, and show no interest for general systems science. Does it mean we have not to show interest for the physical world? Of course not.

Because the physical world does not belong to physicists. In that sense it took me a while as a system scientist to realize that the human expert or scholar an its upgrading to the organic fractal paradigm was not my job. My communication was directly with the Universe. And only then, once I left behind my problems with physicists, in their worldly religion, to make weapons of lineal energy that destroy life and their related idol-ogies – lineal time, continuous, abstract, Cartesian space, denial of organic or perceptive properties to anything but anthropomorphic life, etc. I did truly enjoy for myself the view of the organic Universe of matter.

It is important to understand this difference, specially if you are not a physicist – as you should leave behind your shyness, to feel the life of the material Universe and accept that matter is organic also and nothing differentiates in terms of quality, a human vital fractal organism of space-time from a particle-head/wave-body of physical matter. This said, it is unlikely that physicists will find of interest most of the sections of this blog, except those on the 4th line, when constructed by the year 2017, for the very obvious reason that ‘the (organic) why is the only question physicists don’t ask’ (Feynman), and so they consider only descriptions concerned with mathematical measure and its how (motions and forms of particles and physical systems), as proper of their science.

A simple example will suffice. In GST the duality wave-particle, equivalent to the duality body-head of biological systems is self-explanatory. As all systems have a reproductive body, guided by an informative head, which moves thanks to lineal energetic limbs, all physical systems have a particle-form, often found, as in light waves on top of the wave-body, or higher point to focus information over the lineal field that provides its energy of motion.

Yet, this explanation is organic, regardless of its quantitative measure regarding the value of the energy, the speed of reproduction of information of the wave and the position of the particle. Physicists however to my surprise during my period of conferences were not interested, on this why to the 100 years conundrum of the Principle of Complementarity of physics. For them, it was simply outside the realm of their research as organic, biological properties of Nature, are not mathematical, as they use to explain such bio-logical, logical, in-form-ative characteristics the logic-verbal language of man. 

Still, to make more amenable to physicists those posts on physical systems we will use extensively topological varieties to define such organic ternary structures. Since in a Universe of a single space-time sheet of 4 dimensions there are only 3 possible topologies, the lineal field/hyperbolic wave/spherical particle system we just explained can be considered a full topological system that combines the 3 topological varieties of the Universe into an organic form:

Spe (Lineal -field/limbs) < St-hyperbolic wave-body > tiƒ (informative, cyclical particle/head).

 

So this intermediate jargon, topology, which describes forms with motions is the most often used in the texts of physical systems – here in this introductory post at a very basic level. In the 4th line with a professional jargon and a wealth of algebraic notations.

However it is impossible to understand the physical Universe without whys. Perhaps the most clear example is the galaxy, which must be modeled as a cellular, organic system of creation of black holes, surrounded by a ‘protein-like’ halo of heavy dark matter (likely to be strangelets), and has between this protein membrane and its center DNA-black hole star mitochondria that reproduce their atom and feed the reproduction of black holes. The meaning of the galaxy thus is organic and without accepting organic properties to matter it will never make sense.

The new unit of the organic Universe: The galacell.

All this said, it is obvious that we need to change our wording to convey the new organic properties of co-existing scales in the Universe, and so we shall name when studying those properties the galaxy, the ‘gala cell’, summarized in the next graph:

 

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

 

In the graph, black holes are frozen stars of the top matter decuplet by symmetry with the atoms and stars of our light galactic plane. Then by parallelism with light stars, we differentiate two species of black stars that are also found in Nature:

Tthose which are like our light stars made of  udd atoms, which would be made of dark bcb atoms of much larger densities, but similar properties. They would be the smaller black holes that transform the matter of a light star into bcb neutral atoms without charge. And those who are cosmic black holes, much larger, in the center of the galaxy which become the informative DNA of the galaxy (Maldacena conjecture: the surface of a cosmic BH in 5D maps out as a ‘homunculus mind does with your body’ or the ‘DNA’ with the information of the cell, the entire information of the galaxy in 4D). They are the equivalent of our neutron=strange stars, which have a core of negatively charged strangelet matter that make them turn almost at light speed and produce a hyperstrong magnetic field.

The top quark black hole then will have a ‘core of positively charged top quarks’ which will eject a huge stream jet of ‘negative mass’ neutrinos (likely tachyon strings as the weak angle of a neutrino is the size of a Planck string, 10ˆ-33 and many have been found to have negative mass, hence hyperluminal speeds – more on this latter… Those top quark huge black holes in the center of the galaxy then should  power the faster than c, z=10c motion observed as radiation and mass jets coming out of the center of many  galaxies.

We shall then make a thorough correction of the ‘creationist theory’ of black holes as infinite singularities (Oppenheimer->Wheeler->Penrose and Hawking) and go back to the basic, realist symmetric, fractal Universe of the graph. Since there are two decuplets of matter, belonging to the quantum and cosmological scale, and two type of atoms and two type of stars…

The galatom.

We call ALSO the galaxy, the fundamental Unit of the scalar universe the galatom, when observed from the scalar perspective as its metric equations are in 5 D equal to those of the atom.

We can indeed provide to physicists a mathematical bone in the same theme: an unification equation based in the simple 5d metric equation of a time vortex that unifies atoms and galaxies as mathematical point-particles of the largest and smallest scale perceived by man. It is then a galaxy a large atom of a new scalar Universe, or it is an organic galaxy?

This is not really something new as Kaluza and Klein already unified G and Q with the concept of a radius-curvature that increases when we come into smaller worlds. So we can now put this in theoretical sound footing and provide other parallel inflationary mathematical mirrors of the same concept – using in our case the Hydrogen compared to the galaxy. Of late there have been a flurry of similar deductions of the ‘black hole proton’ after being in our deductions 20 years in the blues (save Mr. Carter awesome work on the electron-black hole). All this mathematical details only come to the same concept: a fractal self-similar Universe that repeats its scales between the galaxy and the atom, hence the name for the galaxy when studied in its scalar mathematical properties.

Here is where another huge conflicting philosophical difference between fractals and continuous space-time as the one used in physics reveals itself: in physics of exact measure, things can only be one thing. In the fractal Universe it all depends on the perception of the perceiver and the scale from where it perceives.

So ‘entities’ are several things at the same time depending on perspective and language and properties we analyze. From the point of view of mathematical 5d metric, atoms and galaxies are two time vortices of information of 2 different scales. From an organic point of view a galaxy is similar to a cell, but I bet you that if we had enough information about the nuclei of atoms and the interactions of its gluons and quarks, which we pretend to know by reducing its properties to a few mathematical statements, atoms will show also somehow an organic cell-like nature.

Yet at the same time, fractals are never equal in scales, so the galaxy is Not really an atom, nor a cell but we say it does have mathematical, fractal properties that accommodate its parameters to the fractal generator of space-time systems, and it has reproductive, organic, co-existing scales, organized by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy that resemble those of a cell.

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘DNA-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – Witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the Universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

A galaxy is thus the fundamental particle-point of the largest scale of the Universe we perceive, which has the same organic, vital, mathematical and also perceptive properties – as black holes do have erratic animal like movement in their motions through their feeding star processes and social gathering into swarms in the center of galaxies, and in fact, its equations reflect those of the plane of starts it controls but with a higher dimension (Maldacena conjecture).

So alas, if RNA must perceive chemically the cell, black holes will likely perceive gravitationally the galaxy. But those are all questions physicists will never consider, as they are ‘meanings’ that cannot be expressed like evolutionary theory, or the logic structure of fractals, in mathematical only terms. So we do confront a religion of mathematical Pythagorean physics started by Kepler and Galileo who affirmed the language of god, and hence of physics is only mathematics. We shall find that human physics, as the most primitive of modern sciences are full of such biased limits, which are not even recognized.

So all in all these posts will have less interest for physicists than for polymaths interested in understanding the whole. Yet as we lay down the main whys we shall latter on enter into the hows and mathematical formalism, translating too, key concepts and equations of thermodynamics, quantum physics and relativity. And clarify all the spooky facts of physics, from the complementarity particle-wave (trivial, just the informative and reproductive parts of a physical system) to the renormalization procedures of mathematical physics. It is not though of much interest to the blog to innovate further into what really physicists think is all about – mathematical equations in which to fit physical properties not yet tabulated. There is little here to add though to the extensive work of physicists, nor we do have any intention to enter into detailed analysis of new physical phenomena or ask for new experiments, let alone design better, more organic machines.

Our purpose is merely to show that with the 10 isomorphic sets of laws of GST we can fit most laws of physics and provide the whys to all the fundamental physical structures such as the particle-head system to which we shall add the entropic, lineal fields that feed them with energy (or in thermodynamics the equivalent gas-entropy/liquid-reproductive/crystal-perceptive ternary elements).

So we shall not concede to physicists any of their dogmas against the organic paradigm. We affirm and shall show that all the organic properties of all other species of the Universe translate to physics; that when a particle, quark or electron absorb energy reproduces into new quarkitos and this process is in nothing different from a reproductive process of a biological or memetic, technological system.

Physicists in that sense are the most limited of all scientists due to the primitivism of the founding fathers, the first modern scientists, still filled with anthropomorphic deist theories of reality. Thus, by extension what passes today as physics is the most limited of all the disciplines of science in its philosophy – obviously not in its details, because of its acceptance of the 3 reductionist a priori statements of classic, ‘biblical’ XVII century science: mechanism (the machine not the organism as the model of the Universe), Pythagorism (mathematics as its only language and hence only mathematical properties matter to mater) and anthropomorphism (living properties are reduced to humans and life).

The result is the general ignorance of the Nature of non-lineal elephants – physical systems with vital and informative properties.

Those properties, which are the fundamental isomorphisms of physical systems are similar to those of any ternary fractal system of the Universe, built with a gauging point of view (particle, atom or charge or mass), described by the isomorphism of the zero-point of all systems, which commands a vital body-wave and an entropic field, which together create a physical system (2nd, 3rd isomorphisms) that goes also through 3 ages=states of matter, (entropic gas, balanced liquid and informative crystal) born of the integral sum of multiple minute space-time actions happening as interaction between the particle-points of its fractal structure through 3 scales (∆-1 atomic, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational scales) (4th, 5th, 6th isomorphisms).

Thus physical systems are as all other systems guided by a central point of view, which is  a temporal, informative system of clock-like ∆-1 particles, molecular, ∆-charges or ∆+1 masses, (accelerated clock-like vortices of logic time of each scale). And do have both, gauging, informative and organic, scalar properties, regardless of the refusal of physicists to incorporate them, because of its bio-logical, non-mathematical description.

Thus we write also for physics a ‘Fractal generator’  of its physical space-time beings, with 3 ternary scalar, temporal and spatial symmetries (1st isomorphism):

∆-1 Spe (lineal Field-Gas) < ∆-ST (iterative hyperbolic wave-liquid) > Tiƒ (spherical, informative, particle/crystal)

Only then after studying the structural space-time dualities and ternary symmetries, defined by that fractal equation (1,2,3 isomorphisms); and its vital, organic, scalar isomorphisms, which describe the integral and derivative space-time actions of physical systems across the scales of the 5th dimension, guided by the zero-point, which stores the will and informative gauging of the system (0, 4, 5, 6th isomorphisms), we can then consider the 3 quantitative isomorphisms, which are explained with a purely mathematical jargon and will connect directly with classic physical themes and equations:

– The isomorphism that defines the Universal constants and ratio between the energetic, wave and informative ternary parts of the system (7th isomorphism), and departing from it, the 8th isomorphism, which studies all the variations of physical systems, and the 9th isomorphism that studies its social logarithmic scales of growth, as the mathematical societies of particle-points of each scale (∆-1, quantum particles, ∆-molecular matter systems and ∆+1 cosmic systems) grow in social scales, changing step by step their properties, to emerge into the new scale of the physical Universe.

So the description of physical systems is the same than that of any other system. Only the immense detail and obsession for exact measure that makes some equations extremely refined in its parameters, which often include by means of renormalization theory every other ‘scalar factor’ as an input of a lesser potency, would make so extensive in the future, the conversion of physical sciences to general systems. It is not however our tasks, which will consist in merely introducing those 10 isomorphisms, as we have done with all other sciences, in the description of its fundamental species. The only concession to the method of physics is a higher rigor as we will soon enter into isomorphic laws with a less descriptive introduction to physical systems.

The 10 isomorphisms thus will be the essence of all physical systems, and its events and ternary forms, as ‘super organisms’, co-existing in those 3 scales and performing world cycles as they mutate back and forth through its 3 states of time, assembles in space into ternary self-centered, vital spaces, surrounded by a limiting membrane (electron in atoms and molecules, event horizons in black holes, exospheres in celestial bodies, and so on), and reproduce/iterate its motions on lower scales of physical entropy.

We shall then be able to describe with the same 10 isomorphic sets of laws all the properties of physical, fractal systems.

And yet none of this is today envisioned or even imagined by our ‘blind physicists’ observing their Universe only with detailed but limited analysis of its parts with single spatial mathematical properties ignoring the invisible time logic of scalar organisms. The picture thus we obtain today of physical systems is very detailed visually but very poor logically. Can we take then a ‘logic’ picture of the whole physical organism? We can, easily using the Fractal Generator and its ternary symmetries in time and space.

In that regard, the backwardness of physics has its positive side as we can advance a lot of answers to pending questions of classic physics: For example, in the mentioned case of the duality between informative particles and reproductive waves, we can wonder the classic question of why we see sometimes a wave and sometimes a particle? Answer: because physical systems do have an informative particle/head that apperceives information in stillness and a body-wave, which reproduces its information as it travels and trans-forms the motion from an entropic field of energy in an iterating pattern equal to its ‘self’.

Of course, none of those answers will be accepted by blind physicists looking to the organic Universe with a lineal stick of time and a single plane of space. But as we said that is not our concern.

THIS IS THE POINT we want to reach after studying all the partial elements of physical systems, translate all the required concepts of physics. And then only then we will be ready to take on each scale and species and show that all of them can be described with those isomorphisms whereas its mathematical languages, will be showing us 5D Space-time beings performing 5 actions of existence.

So for example an electron will be perfectly defined as a 5D space-time being, with a ternary field-wave-particle structure, performing through its 4 mathematical quantum numbers, space-time actions of moving (principal number), feeding, gauging (secondary number0, reproducing (spin number) and evolving socially (magnetic number).

As it is the fundamental tenant of 5d physics that all mathematical equations of physics can be translated to show a description of a ternary physical system, one of its parts and one of its 5 space-time actions.

Now PHYSICS IS THE MOST FAR REMOVED description of the organic Universe because of its uncertainty principles (96% of the larger Universe is not perceived, and smaller systems become uncertain in measure), its abstract primitive analysis of lineal time and continuous space as a background NOT the reality of which beings are made, and the extraordinary detail of analysis of very small parts of the being. This is the essential reason, we do NOT understand physical systems in organic sense, as the graph that opens the foreword shows:

Physicists’ extraordinary detailed analysis of species lacks an organic jargon, a wider view of the whole system, and a desire to ‘see’ properties that are vital in the poor elephant of the graph. This denial is dogmatic.

For example, the most obvious fact – that quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles reproduce – IS STUBBORNLY DENIED, rising when I used to give conferences on the theme as the chair of the science of duality in the world congresses of systems sciences, and mention the theme, smiles among physicists attendants, and often the angry leave of some of them.

This is not the concern of this blog, but of the historical perspective on the profession of physicists, and its worldly deformations of reality in terms of lineal entropy, ego-human trips and power. I do NOT have the intention to yield truth to anthropomorphism or power trips. If a quark absorbs energy and reproduces new quarks, this is NOT a decoupling but a reproduction. And it is an organic action. If a magnetic field organizes as a mathematical language the spins of electrons to fit in harmonic wholes, this is NOT an abstract vector, but a social evolution through a geometric language, akin to the more complex but of the same quality, organization of muscle cells by axon impulses. And so on and so on.

Paraphrasing Feynman, ‘the why is the only question T.Œ asks’. ‘The thoughts of God, not its details’.

A further expansion of the concept of a worldcycle of time, is its analytic study with the 6 classic philosophical forms of motion, first expressed in Aristotle’s Organon. As in philosophy of science, prior to its mathematical definition time is synonymous of change and hence of motion in space, or change of form in time, giving origin to the 2 main sciences, physics, which studies time motions in space and biology which studies changes in form, in the information of beings through time. 5D physics fusions both concepts studying not only ‘locomotions’ in space but also ‘evolutions of form’ in time, which all put together give birth to the worldcycle of existence and extinction of all space-time beings.

So due to this expansion of the paradigm of space and time, in 5D physics we do NOT study only the external locomotions defined with a single time duration: v=s/t, s=ct of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity. We study and apply to all physical systems the 6 motions=changes of philosophy of science.

The so called 6+1  motions of time, defined in philosophy of science, since Aristotle are:

‘Generation’, ‘growth’, ‘evolution’, ‘diminution’, locomotion and extinction.

In classic physics only locomotion could be explained. Now all the motions can be explained as travels in the 5th dimension; so worldlines become world cycles, of which the most important is the sequential series of those 6 motions in a life-death cycle, which also applies to physical systems across all the scales of size, from the cycles of matter, from plasma->gas->liquid->solid->Nuclear fusion, to the big-bang cycle.

In mathematical terms, once we have clarified the origin of those motions, we use the fractal generator, in a simple ternary development to express those 6 motions of time, with an equation of ‘existential algebra’, whose detailed study and connection with physical and biological equations is essential to GST (General systems theory, the philosophical model or Space-time Generator, the logico-mathematical formalism):

œ∆-1 (generated seed of information in a lower scale) ∑œ∆-1>(Reproduction and organization into a fetus which emerges as a new born) Œ∆ <∑Spe (young, entropic age of growth and maximal locomotion) > S≈T ∆+1(adult, reproductive balanced age, when the system iterates and becomes part of a larger social whole) >Max. Tiƒ (3rd, informative, solid age) << ∑œ∆-1 (Entropic, big bang death, which closes the cycle.

Such is the general worldcycle of all systems of the Universe, as all of them are made of space-time, and follow the process of organic creation and dissolution back into spatial entropy.

It is the most important why of GST, which also applies to physical systems in time.

On the other hand, in space the ternary topological symmetry completes our description of the system, and in physics shows a larger regularity as most physical systems tend to have more perfect, lineal entropic, wave-hyperbolic and spherical, informative shapes. So we can often talk of a perfect topological ternary system:

Lineal, |-entropic field > Ø-Hyperbolic body-wave > 0-informative particle (time vortex)

Thus 5D Physics studies physical systems with a fractal, organic analysis of its ‘whole’ ternary systems, defining physical entities as fractals of space-time similar to all other ∆ST super organisms, extending through 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension – the quantum, ∆-1, thermodynamic, ∆ and gravitational ∆+1 scales, tracing world cycles through the 6 canonical motions of all systems, generation, locomotion, growth=reproduction, evolution, diminution and extinction.

Lee Smolin – that rara avis who truly cares about philosophy of science, among physicists and does have an organic, evolutionary theory of black holes, albeit off target as all cosmological physics is – published a curious book called the ‘problem with physics’.

Now I do NOT have a problem with physics, understood as the study of physical systems, of inorganic matter, small atoms and large galaxies. i DO love physics, in its full conceptual analysis of those elements with the isomorphic methods. I DO have huge mental orgasms, the largest ones, only compared to those i have gotten on the study of human artistic forms and its creation with my knowledge of the symmetries of 5D fractal space-time cycles (as I can’t create new particles but I can paint or write symphonies and think as Master Ludi in an Utopian Castalia world).

In that regard the symmetries of the physical world are indeed as Pythagoras and Plato thought of them similar to the processes of linguistic, human mental creation bridged through the mathematical symmetries that mirror the Universe, without the painful realization of the human failure to create the perfect social world.

And so I consider, economists and physicists as the two scholar groups more corrupted by power – economist by money and physicists by their worldly profession – making weapons and thinking on lineal entropy theories of the Universe. We however dealt with that issue on the central posts, on my activist web against the Nuclear industry and on the post on cosmology. So here we will be strictly concerned with pure science, with the whys of physics that physicists do not ask – in parallel with their abstract, mechanist, ‘dead’ vision of the Universe.

 METRIC & CONSTANTS OF THE GALATOM’S 5 DIMOTIONS.

The existential force=momentum of galactic systems: hc

When we study the strong nuclear force as an entropic death of particles that ‘extract’ from them its ‘existential force’ hc, we realize we have found the two key parameters of the ‘galatom’, the superorganism in which we exist.

This concept $=c; ð=h, gives us a product $ð, which is the fundamental constant of any system of nature; and as usual in the entangled universe, will have different forms of ‘measuring it’… conceptually and physically but we shall call generally the 5Ð metric of a system or in terms of its ‘value’, the existential force or existential momentum of the system, its ‘power’ to survive. And so it is closely related to the vital Energy of the system, which other systems will absorb as in the case of the decay of pions in the strong force…  as indeed happens in Einstein’s formulae: E=hc/λ

Let us re-examine this formula, as it tells us a lot on the nature of physical light spacetime systems as we are, in the context of the fifth scalar dimension:

Paradoxically the minimal unit of the galatom, the ‘planckton’, defined by its existential force, hc, has more energy the smaller λ, its wavelength is. The explanation though is immediate in 5D metric: as the larger wholes are ‘ghosts’ rising from the lower scales, obviously they must have a lesser quantity of energy, because they are ultimately parasites of its parts. So the inner Russian dolls of reality concentrate more ‘energy and information’ to supply the potential ghost-wholes that will enclose them.

So we talk of a ‘nested Universe’, in which the space and time, form and motion, relative h and c parameters that define the existential constants of the being grow for larger wholes (larger c-like speeds) made of smaller informative parts (denser h-like informative positions). And this implies that outside the galatom, there must be other scales, with larger than c speeds and lower than h-uncertainties-temperatures, informative ‘cooler’ orders – more focused angles of perception – similar jargons…

SO the compound constant of the 5th dimension for the galatom is simple and as such it will be all pervading when considering the meaning of the ‘real constants’ of the Universe:

5D Galatom Supœrganism’s metric:    $(c)  ð (h) = Constant.

hc is thus one of the ‘missed’ essential co-invariant constants of the Universe, the galatom metric equation, and so it is all pervading in the equations of physics, the best known of them being the fine-structure constant,  α whose value is e²/hc, which simply expresses the ‘interaction’ (read emergence) of an electron charge from its ultimate components, nebulae of PLANCKTON, the name we have coined for the ‘vital photon’ particles of which we are all made, as an electron ultimately is a cloud of highly dense photons, its ‘cells’ that have ‘collapsed’ from wave-motion to informative position state as part of its higher ¡+1 planes of existence.

How then can we relate the ‘human’ constants of perception (length, mass and time) to the galatom’s ‘real objective, natural constants’?

Easy… As there was a genius of physics that figure them out:

In the graph, the ‘real constants and parameters’ of physical systems.

In particle physics and physical cosmology, Planck units are a set of units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of five universal physical constants:

  • the speed of light in a vacuum, c, which is the constant of reproduction of information, or 1st and 3rd Dimotion of the quantum world.
  • the reduced Planck constant, ħ, which is the constant of informative perception of all light-species or 1st Dimotion of all species within the galatom.
  • the gravitational constant, G, which is the constant of curvature/acceleration/time clocks of the cosmological scale, or limit of scaling (5D+¡).
  • the Coulomb constant, ke = 1/4πε0, which is the constant of curvature/acceleration/time clocks of the quantum scale or limit of scaling (5D-¡).
  • the Boltzmann constant, kB, , which is the constant of entropic, decelerating time clocks of the human scale or 4th dimotion of the human world.

Each of these constants can be associated with a fundamental physical theory or concept: c with special relativity, G with general relativity, ħ with quantum mechanics, ε0 with electromagnetism, and kB with the notion of temperature/energy (statistical mechanics and thermodynamics).

THUS Planck units ARE the constants of the 5 Dimotions of the galatom and all its internal parts, NOT the human parameters of measure of which the 3 most important are obviously $ (c), ð ( h) and G, the constant of curvature that encases the quantum world and absorbs its ‘energy’ to make it emerge in the upper cosmological scale. Thus the key constants of space and time can be extracted from them, as we shall do in our posts on physics.
We shall though make some comments on those constants: first, lineal time and lineal space are NOT relevant beyond human to the Universe, as time we say is cyclical.
So what would be the proper unit of time? At first sight frequency, 1/T, but again, time is NEVER static, but a worldcycle of increasing information – a vortex of accelerated frequency, hence the proper measure of time is angular acceleration, 1/t², which in Planck’s natural units render cˆ5/hG, getting rid of the meaningless ‘root’.
So goes for lineal distance: in the bidimensional universe where all line has volume as it is made of fractal points, the unit of space is ‘area’ and so we get rid of the root again: Area=hG/c³.
In other words, time is cyclical and space is squared, and the constant transformation of one into another is never perfect, leaving some ‘entropic waste’ since the problem reduces to ‘squaring the circle’…
Next we notice here that cyclical time and space have the same units but time has a c², reproductive factor added. So we might say that a worldcycle of time, is the reproductive sums of ‘steps in space’ till we get enough ‘SLICES’ of space, to complete the worldcycle.
Nt. Here we are using the common concept of ‘space’ as a present slice of the time flow-NOT the more sophisticated related concept of space as the still ‘perception of a present’ slice of time, which is a theme you can fully grasp on the post on ‘immortal zero sums’.
So we have a very interesting first conclusion: c² (remember the Universe is bidimensional always, so c must be squared to make sense of it also), seems to be the reproductive factor to increase dimensions of the different quantitative parameters we study. And if we have a fast look back to those units, we see everywhere that we need to square to get rid of roots and makes sense of those parameters, and most of them are combinations, in which the difference is another c² added, clearly meaning we add to the parameter a new ‘dimension’; that is a new dimotion.
Because this is THE LOGIC GAME OF THE UNIVERSE: to move and act with simplex or complex ensembles of the 5 Dimotions of reality to get simpler or more complex systems.
The scalar fundamental parameters of physics are charge and mass, which we have already defined as time vortices – charge in the ∆-1 quantum scale; mass for the cosmological ∆+1 scale.
So mass is a vortex of accelerated time; which in terms of space-distance is a measure of the curvature of the vortex (this classic physics accepts).
But VERY IMPORTANT ERROR TO CORRECT: we shall notice that for historic reasons both constants are ‘measured with inverse parameters’ (notice this observing that Planck charge has 4 π e and Planck’s mass has 1/G). The physicist knows though that the 4 π was included in G as a historic choice; and the units were inverted RESPECT to each other also by historic clueless choice.
So the proper constant wouldn’t really be G but 1/G and then all makes sense, as 1/G, the ‘real constant’ will merely mean the maximal quantity of mass-energy that the galaxy can enclose by volume of space; and so we must consider G the constant of scale, H, the constant of information-time-angular momentum and c, the constant of reproduction of information or ‘motion’ as the 3 constants that define the ‘domain’ of a galatom, and Q, shown to be merely the same metric reduced to the quantum scale with the unification of both, the other limiting vortex of time of the galatom.
So we read mass² (since mass is a flat vortex of accelerated time in the cosmological scale but we observe 3 dimensional volumes so we need to consider its square) = (hc) 1/G, as the limit of vortex speed/density in any region of the galatom, which will happen in the black hole event horizon, beyond which we enter a different region of the Universe.
There is much to learn of a proper analysis of all those constants and relationships, to reinterpret everything in physics from the simplified reality of spacetime beings.
Consider a last example: ‘pressure’ a key concept downplayed as secondary in physics. Its classic units are L¯¹ (curvature)  M T¯² (angular acceleration). Yet precisely because curvature is a better measure of ‘space’ in a relative universe where ‘size’ is relative but curvature is always meaningful, and angular acceleration is a better measure of time passing, as lineal time is meaningless and cyclical frequency does not let time pass, while mass locate us in the scale in which those measures of time and space are taken, it comes to be a beautiful parameter to express the inward ‘force’ of any physical ystem, that is, its 5th dimotion. And it took me a bit of thought to find out why it is indeed cˆ7/h G², borriquito como tu (: we are all asses: huminds are not that smart, spanish proverb ):

The basic insight being that dimensions in the galatom are perceived as ‘light spacetime, because that is THE BACKGROUND ABSOLUTE NEWTONIAN SPACE: LIGHT-SPACETIME; AND SO WE ARE TALKING OF C AS THE LINE, C² AS THE AREA AND C³ AS A VOLUME, and Cˆª as a combination of those:

Point is if you want to communicate with aliens those are your units and parameters (: as long as they are aliens within the galatom, because when we come out of it, all bets are lost.
We are then outside the galaxy, where there is no longer ‘light’ but dark entropy (energy) as the background, in a complete new world of which physicists have no idea, they just think they know, and of which they have so far found only a Universal constant of curvature, lambda, Einstein’s cosmological constant, from where we should depart time permitted some time into the future to wonder what is the Universe we live in? Likely a mixed big of entropic gas, with some repetitive atoms of the next scale…
What that constant must be, we advance IS either a curvature positive but far smaller than G as G is far smaller than Q, and then it means we are inside a vortex of time and its calculus should give us the ‘scaling’ for the next level of reality, and hence the forces interacting between galaxies which ARE NOT GRAVITATIONAL FORCES. But most likely should be negative, as they are equivalent to the electromagnetic exxpansive forces between atoms and so we are not in a fluid vortex but rather in an entropic gas – my take.
But all those constants could evolve as Dirac understood, since they are related to the time evolution of the regions they measure, in the case of G, our galaxy. Q though must be more constant as electrons seem to live for ever. However if the galaxy lives forever will however have ‘beats’ and so while on the long term they must not change, in the short term, as the galaxy collapses into the black hole, G will be strengthen. Themes those for our four lines.

However all languages can do that as all of them can reflect the logic of cyclical time, and evolution in fact does it much better than physics, due to its error of lineal time and a single arrow of time for all systems of reality, when there are infinite of such arrows and all of them are cyclical, as we shall see latter in our study of the basic cycles and forces of particles and quantum physics.

What this means is that the ‘lineal big-bang’ is truly pseudoscience, even if it is written in mathematics, because it does not follow the logic, espitemologic and experimental law of the scientific method.

The dimensions of the human mind.

All this said, we can reconsider a previous graph of the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the human mind, which are nothing but the perpendicular dimensions of light and its magnetic, electric and speed dimotions.  So what we call space and time is light space-time, which will have profound implications to understand in a realist way the paradoxes of relativity as we shall do when considering the stience of cosmology.

The next and obvious question though, when we accept this simple ‘first principle’ of reality is obvious.  If we do NOT exist in an abstract mathematical artifact of 3 infinite dimensions of space and one infinite duration of time, but we are made of vital space that lasts a duration of time – our cycle of existence – how can we explain existence and all its properties departing ONLY of the properties of our ultimate ‘substances’, space and time?

It is obvious that we can’t, if we only use the 3 standard dimensions of space, and the single ‘dimension’ or rather motion of time, called locomotion and in its collective form, entropy. At best with those dimensions we can talk of the volume of space a being occupies, closed by its membrane, which will then move through its larger world tracing what physicists call ‘worldlines’… And so the explanation we get to describe the existence of a being, in the standard 3+1 Dimensions with the standard concepts of Newtonian Space-time reduces to the being ‘moving’ around all his life, till it finally dies in an ‘explosion’ of entropy, where the motion is not only external but internal, scattering its parts in the moment of death.

This might suffice of course to explain the existence of a simple physical being, particle or wave of matter but when we consider the life of a more complex being, as a human system is, we are left unsatisfied by such ‘reduccionist’ view provided by modern physics within the straight-jacket of a single time dimension and a single space-continuum, which only poises more questions.

For example, why only a single time dimension, when even in verbal thought we talk of 3 dimensions, past, present and future? Shouldn’t be more logic to consider 3 dimensions of time; and then if there are 3 dimensions of time, and 3 of space, are then not symmetric to each other? And why a space continuum if we see space broken in infinite entities, as relational space-time has it; would then not space become as in quantum physics discontinuous in smaller scales, the parts of wholes; and then if parts and wholes are different do not they occupy different spaces, and so we need another dimension of space, to fit them all; and what is the form of time if time has more than one single lineal dimension, a circle of two dimensions, a sphere?

 

Time requires accelerated motion.
All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

How we perceive the previous scheme of time clocks in physical particles is self-evident: vortices of accelerated forces (Equivalence principle of Einstein) are the TIME CLOCKS of physical systems, which carry in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe and they are accelerated if ‘time is going to advance’ towards a 3rd warped age, from galaxies (cosmological vortices) to charges (quantum vortices). If the system is conserved and doesn’t change in a present state we talk of a conserved present-energy; if the system dissipates and looses form as it expands in time and finally stops, we talk of an entropic, relative ‘past’ state.
Energy is the main parameter physics uses to calculate physical world cycles which in computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldccyle etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.
As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.
Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). 

@: SENTIENT UNIVERSE: FRAMES OF REFERENCE.

When studying a physical time§paœrganism the best way to do it, given our scanty direct perception of them, is through some of its actions, in which they will move and process information in a certain pattern, within a larger super organism, which in the case of the particle will normally be an atom. As such within the atom, the particles are either part of its t-membrane, its st vital space or its •Singularity with its still focused mind, which humans represent as a centre of a frame of reference, in any of its 3 ‘topological space-time dimensions.
What is the perception of each mind-singularity mapping its territory according to its function is of interest. Even more is to find suitable frames of reference to model the 10D (5s≈5t) time§paœrganism. Normally we can consider its asymmetries to make a possible focused mathematical mirror, giving to space the positive real coordinates, time its negative, and the scalar 5th dimension set on the Y≈ i-coordinates, and combine them to represent different s, t, st states… the possibilities of mathematical modelling of the 10 Dimensions of space-time and scale, self-centred in an S@ singularity with a constrain given by a T-membrane enclosed the being to its domain of scales, topologies and functions, is ginormous and only apt for the imaginative mathematicians.
The ones physicist use (phase, multidimensional, conformal, Lorentzian, Hilbertian, etc.) are shows of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis done in a limited range of dimensions and or fractal points often with its own ternary dimensions, to study different ‘fancy’ analysis of partial domains of Tœs of many different scales of reality. We shall try to set a more orderly standard now that we know what we talk about. The studies of physicist in that sense are often of 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension).
And when philosophising about entropy arrows, studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe. The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time. As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.
An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules. A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.
The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies. Motion=youth, with increasing energy order and decreasing entropy till reaching the reproductive state of balance, and then of information, dying then into disordered, scattered motion, to restart again:
Γ@: Seed of information + energy energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death =zero sum
So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:
4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§
So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time symmetric dimensions

 

The humind bias.

The conclusion is obvious: the humind biases our perception of Nature specially in physics, because we do NOT care about the organic, pan psychic nature of matter, and as we do not see the mind mappings of the singularity, by definition a ‘single quanta of space-dilated in time’ (inverse hence to the event of death, a single quanta of time dilated in space), we are NOT measuring singularities but physical parameters will be related only to two kind of elements:

A compressed dimensional view:  the 5D² Rashomon truths>Ðisomorphic methods to physics.

So we have deviced two epistemological methods to study 5й¹ super organic world cycles:

  • 5Ð: the Rashomon effect focuses on the study of the 5 main Dimotions=actions and elements of the system IN ITS entangled relationships: ¬ S@<≈>∆ð; whereas the system is composed of spatial elements, an @ membrain, scalar elements, temporal ones, connected through flows of motion and form, <≈>, which will all be negated, ¬ in the entropic arrow of death.
  • 11 Ðisomorphisms: The Disomorphic method focuses in the world cycle generated by a perceptive point of view/seed – that creates the whole superorganism but also destroys by an excess of informative actions

In praxis the structural enumeration of any timespace organism’s isomorphic 11 Dimensions is best to describe a sequential world cycle, starting by a seed-singularity-monad, @, in the languages they use to code and speak its actions, which better express its properties; which in physics is clearly mathematics, the topo-logic and social-numerical languages likely mind of atoms (spin, trigonometric angle computing; magnetic, topological formation; ¥-frequency and boson digital societies, etc.)

Yet even when considering the expression of Dimotions and world cycles in mathematical languages, as we shall do in physical systems, it is best to refer the lesser mirror-language to the larger sentient, scalar space-time, @∆st, properties embedded in an ultimate reality behind physical systems: space-time itself.

So we can then formalize its parts and 11 Dimensions with a fractal generator as a template for further detailed studies of those 3 s = 3 t = 3∆ ±2@ formal/motion dimensions of any physical system, put in one to one relationship with those isomorphic dimensions, as follows (we ad the corresponding main non-euclidean postulate that defines its laws)

MIND ÐISOMORPHISMS

0. @-monad: charge-mass singularity in physics + membrane≈angular momentum, ruled by the 5th non-E postulate, which will order a territory described by:

1. A fractal, Linguistic generator and its ternary syntax (mathematical language in physics), which will define 3 states-topologies from states of matter and quantum states (Gas/potential < liquid wave >crystal boson) to ternary systems of conserved angular momentum (membrane), lineal momentum (singularity) and vital energy (enclosed by them) and perform

5 dimotions=actions coded by quantum numbers (∆-1 scale), thermodynamic laws, and the relativity of its locomotions (¡+1)… through

SPACE ÐISOMORPHISMS

2. Bidimensional forces≈waves≈bosons that communicate fermion particles and Tœs at different scales, according to the 2nd postulate of non-E geometry ruled by…

4. A(nti)symmetries that break an asymmetric system into its perpendicular parts (big-bangs, death-entropy processes) or symmetries that evolve social particles in parallelism, whose laws the 4th non-E postulate of ¡logic geometry describes; and finally construct.,..

3,6:  ternary networks in galaxies and matter that deliver energy and information to the parts, through electromagnetic and gravitational flows, structuring all ternary physical systems with variations of species by scale, form and motion as explained by the laws of the 3rd Postulate that defines planes as topological messed ternary networks (as each line is now a network, and 3 lines define a plane).

In this manner, the spatial mind isomorphisms and its actions generate the ternary adjacent structure in space we call a super organism. And then this super organism can be studied in its evolution in times and travels through the social scales of the Universe, in the remaining Isomorphisms of…

TIME DISOMORPHISMS.

7,8: SINCE the being will live a world cycle whose physical best generator equation, is Einstein’s E<cc>M dual directionality of entropic systems that implode into informative masses and charges or explode… which we can even hypothesize for the whole Universe with a big bang/big crunch worldcycles, mimicked in the infinite fractal existences of matter. So we can study the 3±¡ AGES of existence of a matter system and as we shall see also apply to certain cases, such as the table of elements, the 9×9 ‘families’ of growing ‘ages and social scales’:

SCALE DISMORPHISMS

9.10: Thus social scales of TERNARY and decametric nature happen also in physical systems allowing the classification of species by increasing mass (families of mass, growing domains of magnetism, atomic>molecular ensembles; cosmic societies; 8-9 families of atomic matter).

So those 11 isomorphic dimensions become then the main tool to classify events, species and laws laws of physical systems studied with the language of its singularities, mathematical formalisms.

To make sense of such a huge discipline, we study the 5 Ðimotions, which deserve an entire chapter of its own in the post on Ðimotions and mathematical physics (as mathematics of motions has been the language and purpose of physics, so we need to recast it as an analysis of 5 not one Ðimotion)

And so we shall first study and adapt to ∆@s≈t the basic concepts of mathematical physics and then study in 3 different posts those 5 motions in a general way, with special emphasis in the social scales and planes of the physical Universe, which will also deserve a part of its own; while this post will analyze the 11 Ðisomorphisms of physical systems.

So we divide the discipline of astrophysics in 3 subparts:

  1. The study of its 5 actions=Ðimotions in Mathematical physics, the language of its singularity-monads.
  2. The 11 Ðisomorphisms of its present ternary systems.
  3. The scalar=social and organic=planes of physical systems.

Whereas the emphasis of those posts is in the 4th and 5th dimensions of scales and minds, as those are the less understood parts of physics, and the symmetries of the galilean paradox between formal space dominated by functional time, and its motions≈actions.

IV. STIENTIFIC METHOD: REALISM VS. CREATIONISM

 

A realist, logic Universe.

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes.

Basically consider absolute space and time an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of physics often means, a reality.

Moreover as languages are mirrors, NOT all equations of mathematical physics are truth without evidence. So they must be proved by experimental evidence and by the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that  CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:

  • Occam’s razor: simplicity NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’
  • Efficiency, a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).
  • Experimental proofs: ‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

Definition of the Fractal, Organic Universe – Adding the scalar dimensions

The Universe is therefore defined as a fractal superorganism of space and time, co-existing in multiple scales, related by spatial networks and temporal flows of its 3 conserved quantities, lineal and cyclical motion/momentum and its combined ‘energies’.

Further on as we shall show those scales relate to each other with a metric equation, Size x Time Speed = Constant, which makes equivalent atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes… And so it hints strongly to an absolute relative, infinite number of scales.

If so there is no limit of relative size; and so all the parts of the Universe, all its ∆±i quanta ARE also T.œs: time space superorganisms. As simple as that; as complex as all the variations and iterations of space-time superorganisms made to the image and likeness of the whole that can exist, within the limiting properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

So how can we generate all those realities departing only of two ‘elements’ fractal space and cyclical time? The answer is in the fractal dimensions of space-time, the dimension which puts parts into wholes (5D) and break wholes into parts (4D, or entropy proper); which add to  the usual space-time dimensions humans consider in their analysis of reality.
Further on besides the scalar Dimensions of entropy and social evolution, we define time as motion and space as form, and consider that all form can be seen in motion and vice versa – the true meaning of Galilean Relativity. So we double the dimensions of space when perceived as time motions. And that gives us a tally of 3 classic space dimensions, plus entropy-dissolution of wholes into scalar parts, plus social evolution of parts into wholes, that is 5Dimensions of space, plus 5 of time, when space is seen in motion.
And it gives us a fundamental equation of symmetry: S (form) = T (motion-function).
So when we understand that both time and space have five dimensions symmetric to each other, (5S≈5T) we can really combine them in various forms to generate everything that exists in reality.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimotions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

BACK TO REALITY AND SOUND PHYSICS.

Creationism plagues all aspects of physics, in all the scales of the galatom, so 5D on the line of Einstein and De Broglie regains in all those scales a realist view of physics as it is, where information matters more than entropy, cold processes more than hot ones, particles more than waves, and all can be explained as it has always been, choosing the realist models in each scale, from the quantum realism of Einstein->Broglie->Bohm, to the realist view of the galaxy as an organism; making NO-EXCEPTIONALIST assumptions in any of those scales:

In the graph, the true rational, explanation of quantum physics – the pilot wave theory, recently proved by the interstellar EM engine, vs. the subjective ego-centered theory of ‘the observer’ who creates quantum reality, which has become canonical and is ultimately a religious creationist theory.

The astounding fact about Physics today, both in quantum theory and Cosmology is its ‘outlook’ as an anthropomorphic religion that has substituted earlier abrahamic religions, without respecting the basic laws of objectivism of science, unlike all other disciplines. So Physicists have on one side accepted ‘weird’ theories of reality that make man – in this case the observer – the center of creation, against the sound-sound objective theories of reality available and far more sound experimentally, which however eliminate any ‘entitlement for human beings’. Such is the case of the infamous argument between the founders of quantum theory, Planck, Einstein, De broglie and Schrodinger, and his pilot-wave interpretation and the ‘newcomers’, Hilbert, Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg who imposed a new religion of humans and their mathematics as the ‘creators’ of reality. While in cosmology, they created by the elimination of the informative gravitational force that creates mass out of entropy in galaxies, another weird theory called the big-bang, in which all reality was once according to a simple lineal equation, V≈HoD, compressed in a single point, easy to describe with its simple mathematical tools, a mere mirror-language of reality.

At the heart of those simple, anthropomorphic, ‘creationist’ theories of reality which CERN pretends to explore further, as in the case of Abrahamic religions there is fundamental, existential problem of humanity: the paradox of the ego, which true science and his lonely humble geniuses have always tried to combat with little results – as humans systematically prefer a theory that makes them ‘exceptional’ and happy that one that tells them the objective truth of their non-importance in the universe. In as much as the indifference to the risks of cern are precisely based in the arrogance of humans who cannot conceive its extinction we cannot only consider theoretical, experimental and military reasons to CERN’s potential genocide but do have to criticise the essence of that human arrogance, the paradox of the ego that makes 1/2 of mankind to believe we are ‘chosen of a Bush-God of the bronze age that makes us immortal’ and only its verbal priests can understand, while the other 1/2 believe the Universe was created in a single point described by a single equation in the single language of God, mathematical physics, which only ‘physical experts’ can understand.

-So instead we will reconsider a more objective theory of reality than those sponsored by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics and the big-bang interpretation of creation. Namely the sound-sound, increasingly proved theories of Einstein both in quantum and cosmology (pilot wave theory along De Broglie, and steady state along Fred Hoyle). Indeed after a century of ‘propaganda’ of the creationist and observer’s theory of physics, which so much pumps the human ego, the sound theories of Einstein keep coming back with new proofs, and keep giving new avenues of thought and will if we survive CERN become standard one humans stop being so arrogant about what they can and cannot know and what is the nature of reality.

  • The realist humble, relativistic interpretations, which are right and time always brings back, since Copernicus, Descartes and Leibniz the philosophers of science affirmed, his relative theories of time and space and the mind to the times of Einstein, Bohm and Hoyle, who all of them fond of philosophy of science and ‘fist principles’ affirmed a realist quantum interpretation (above), a realist Universe with 2 time arrows, entropic space which dilates it but also informative gravitation that ‘collapses’ those entropic waves into galactic matter, balanced overall its total volume. And finally the use of mathematics as a language-mirror of the mind that does NOT create reality, but merely fits it nicely on the small brain, and has therefore to be studied a priori, AS A LANGUAGE OF THE MIND, with the same ternary syntax, inflationary errors, and modelling properties of all other equally valid languages that mirror reality (visual, verbal languages in man, chemical in life, gravitational in cosmology, etc.)
  • The egocentered anthropomorphic interpretations,which always attempt to reduce phenomena ONLY to those elements that ensure the Human Ego to come on top of reality, from the Ptolemaic theories of the Earth as center of the Universe, to Newton’s definition of absolute space as the plenum body of ‘Yhwh’, to the quantum observer theory, to the axiomatic method of Hilbert in mathematics, as the language humans imagine and comes a priori, creating NOT reflecting reality. Contrary to belief those interpretations who require the ELIMINATION of all non-human larger truths. So Ptolemy dismissed the larger sun in the center. Newton dismissed time and space as relational systems of multiple clocks, carried by different species, NOT only the human, mechanical clock (Leibniz and Einstein). Bohr dismissed the quantum potential field that feeds the motions of particles, even if we don’t see them. And denied the obvious – if we don’t see them is NOT because they are not there but because they are so far removed of our scale of space size and time that we just have a limited information.

ALL THIS MEANS basically, that singularity theories are pseudo-science, and that includes both, black hole evaporation and its ‘reverse’ equations of the big-bang. Because they respond to the ‘egocy’ paradox of human scientists that confuse the capacity of a language as a synoptic mirror of reality to reflect that reality and even forecast in its reduced synoptic logic, the deterministic future of the motions and ‘life-death cycles’ of a species (either with mathematics or verbal evolutionary theories), with its capacity to create reality with FICTIONS natural to all languages. So as Einstein put it ‘I know when mathematics are logic truths but not when they are real’. Reason why the ‘scientist’ should only be concerned with facts that have been proved experimentally, which do NOT include the equations of black hole evaporation and the equations of the big-bang, as we shall show now in a bit of more detail (keeping the bulk of the proof for our cosmological models on the section of 5D with its alternative, fractal, organic, immortal Universe).

Indeed, there are many other sounder proper explanations to every supposed cosmic big-bang phenomena, but when an entire ego-centered group of human beings is in a ‘mission’ pumping with zealot ego human power, there is no ‘reasoning’ able to stop the tsunami – the sound reasons are hidden, unpublished, the half-reasons which favor the pseudo-religion are pumped, retouched ad hoc, as Gamow’s temperature…

So we do dedicate an entire post on cosmology to study a little bit in detail this theory, which i am now on the business of properly rewriting as the rest of this idle web for many years left alone after the failure of suits and films to rise public awareness.

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe… 

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

While basically Einstein’s attempts to put reason on quantum theory were ignored after he defied Bohr, till his death. He got an FBI file, nobody was going to his classes, and so he dedicated himself to talk to Godel on the ridiculous concept of Mathematics as the substance of the Universe, to boating and walking… Then they discovered black holes, all his theories were proved… till Hawking decided as a celebrity guru to challenge him with his theory of black holes traveling to the past, totally ignorant of the real time arrows of the Universe.

AND THINGS even got worst, with Bohm, who completed Broglie’s pilot wave theory – he got ignored, got his FBI file, was stripped of his American nationality and became an expatriate. Do not think physicists take lightly any attack on his religion of ‘seers’ of time.

In that regard, it is necessary to stress as we do in many articles the sociological and military-industrial topics, which so well work together to prevent the simple, easy solution to CERN – close the factory of strangelet liquid, which is nothing but deconfined quark matter, the ‘thing’ the LHC keeps doing each year in bigger amounts till it become stable and does us all. Basically the LHC is the showcase for most high tech industries and the pet-project of the most powerful group of science, physicists – since they make the machines and weapons of our industrial civilisation; and so sponsor ‘Fromm’s technological ethics: ‘if we can make a machine we must make it, even if it kills us all.

So on one side the pressure of peers is enormously and on the other the rest of mankind who worships machines and physicists will never dare to defy something they don’t understand. 

 

Let us then twist the mind of the believer in abstract creationism, a bit more showing the fundamental law of 5D organicism and systems sciences – that all scales of reality show the same phenomena, explaining properly what the weak force is and how it ‘rises’ in all scales of reality from the simplest neutrino to the human being and beyond…

Realism vs. Creationism

Difficulties  explaining 5й¹ ilogic physics to 4D mathematical physicists.

The biggest difficulties of T.Œ is not Physics (the observable) but human physicists (the observer and its anthropomorphic ideologies and linguistic, mathematical-only method), which reduce physical systems to the mathematical properties they can describe with their faulty euclidean mirror. Further on the limits of huminds with its relative position in the ∞ scales of reality provoke:

  • The distortion of information caused by the far away location of its two most studied present limits, cosmic physics (big bang theory, renormalized in the previous post) and quantum theory not to speak of the beyond – strings.
  • The use of simplified mathematics without the proper use of sound conceptual wording to explain the result of its equations, something physicists scorn with an ‘arrogance’ proper of its status as Popes of science, who only speak a mathematical Latin which few understand and camouflage many conceptual errors (there is no clear definition of time, space, scales, dimensions, even motion, its most studied item is not yet defined – Zeno’s paradox).
  • A wrong understanding of the 3±¡ Ðimotions of timespace (reduced to locomotion and its maximal social form – entropy), and the symmetry between space dimensions and time motions shown in the 3 topologies of a space-time organism.
  • Because of this mathematical only expression and lineal single time dimension, the denial of mental, organic and many causal relationships of physical systems, which makes physics lacking that conceptual understanding of its whole theories, despite its enormous detail on the mathematical how-description. For example, all the spooky and weird constructs of quantum physics, which are sound mathematically can ONLY be interpreted ¡logically within the organic paradigm, to make sense of its probabilistic maths, through its space-time symmetry with statistical populations.
  • And finally because of its platonism that accepts all equations are real, the lack of an Occam’s crib to reduce the inflationary kaleidoscopic nature of mind-mirrors-languages, and eliminate redundant mathematical ‘images’. I.e. the Copenhagen or the multi universe versions lack the logic sense of Bohm’s realism, so they are good redundant mathematical mirrors. And Bohm’s view should be preferred.

Yet the biggest handicap for physics to straighten up its conceptual errors is the stubborn denial of the fractal, organic properties of matter that solve most of its conundrums. Let us consider some examples of quantum physics, and how ‘weirdness’ disappears when organicism appears:

The initial Schrodinger concept of ‘density’ of the electron then is the proper realist way, when we explain the symmetries of time-space scales between 0-1 probabilistic spheres in time and the 1-∞ thermodynamic plane in space  (in measure theory the treatment of populations in space in the 1-∞ plane is equivalent to the 0-1 laws probabilities in time).

Space v. time, form v.motion symmetries explain why moving waves collapse into fixed particles that gauge information. In vital terms all herds that move as waves and become tight still ‘particles’ when ‘bombed’ by huge observers, aka predators – the human observer.

Entanglement is explained with the addition of a lower quantum potential non-local scale, as information travels in the lower, non-local gravitational space-time that connects particles at distance. So entanglement should have a much faster speed and seem magic…

This is a general law: information travels faster in lower planes, according to $ X ð = Constant metrics…. as this text is NOT travelling to you by sound voice but instantaneous light speed, translated by the net, and then you see its wording and might read its slow voice.

5 DIMENSIONAL DISCIPLINES: RASHOMON TRUTH OF MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS

This said, the Universe is a game of ∞ Sπcies of space-time making STeps and STops in its constant œxist¡ence (where we use π for time, in this particular wor(l)d according to the slightly changed rules of i-verbal thought for english to look more like the universal game), and so as Stops and steps (ab. œ) bring the being into exist¡ence we can measure them quantitatively as space-distances and time-motions. Stop and step then becomes topology and feed-back equations, where = is substituted by the dynamic symbol <=>, and the duality from = stops and ≈ wave steps.

Once the intuitive meaning of those symbols rises the awareness of the reader to the vital nature of our humind’s abstract rendition of reality things become then dynamic. ≈ for STeps, = for motions, and ≤≥ as the different implosive or explosive, informative or entropic ‘degeneracy’ of a system are easily quantifiable and translatable to both mathematics in its pure expression and mathematical physics.

So first thing we must learn are the…

∆@ST BIO-TOPOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: ¬Æ SCIENTIFIC METHOD

‘Every point is a world in itself’ Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.

‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ Einstein

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and its limited description with linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best, must be enhanced by adding linguistic mirrors, such as:

Max. linguistic truth = ∑ linguistic perspectives on a single phenomena.

LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

Which means in search of more global truths we canNOT multiply the confusing mathematical mirrors of inflationary, as they are ‘metaphoric truths’, but multiply the different languages man uses to describe the ‘other’ sentient, causal and organic properties not susceptible of mathematical analysis.

Only organicism is real in the whole sense of mirroring a maximal truth of properties about the Universe, while each language-mirror is a reductionist local view.

The EGOCY of our entropic age of history whose social structures are becoming dissolved simply reduced the organic, scalar power of networks that are more powerful and make its parts survive – creating also in physical systems a scalar symbiosis between quantum laws that ’emerge’ as thermodynamic laws that ’emerge’ as gravitational laws, as its ‘aggregation’ of herds into single wholes, enclosed by a membrain of the higher scale ‘dumps’ the quantum effects in thermodynamics (the classic case being the Curie’s law) and thermodynamic effects in gravitation (the classic case, being ‘frozen stars’ of quasi-null thermodynamic heat, which dominate galaxies, as black holes=top quark stars and strangelets=halos do).

Yet given that platonic religion of the discipline the only form to convince physicists of the organic, fractal nature of the Universe is to upgrade mathematical thought to the new found fractal properties of space and cyclical properties of time. Then perhaps, once the magic of mathematical thought as the origin of reality, when it is merely a mirror of that space-time enhanced properties disappear and physicists can look at mathematical physics as what it is: a synoptic language that best reduces the multiplicity of similar fractal beings of space-time to its essential space-mathematical and time-logic properties. As this is done today however it reduces excessively those properties as it starts with a priori reductions of space as a single continuum and time as a lineal motion with a single dimension. And denies the scalar structure of reality.

Even if then it uses mathematics to describe those properties it denies to time and space. In that sense, the mathematical science of physics relies heavily on analysis, because it is the best mathematical operandi to study Ƥscales:

Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5Ð are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5Ð motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

The mind as the essential element both of physical systems and the humind observing them, is a huge extended underrated element of physical systems, so we shall consider several aspects of it, starting by the objective analysis of those singularities – keeping as usual the mathematical formalisms for the fourth line, and then considering the subjective perspective of huminds observing physical systems with a bias to degrade them and come on top… as usual given our ego paradox.

Alas! huminds will not accept to share sentient properties with physical minds, but when explaining the Universe, they will have NO problem expanding the Humind to enclose the Universe itself within its mirror language. This is what we call the creationist theories of reality, which plague all humind sciences even if we don’t recognise it, and Physics is Not EXCEPTION. So we shall confront it with the realist theory of physics as the study of space-time beings.

Let us now consider a mental view which includes the human observer, as the biased element that deforms our view of physical systems with the ego paradox – namely the creationist, mathematics only concept of physical knowledge that reduces all the properties of physical systems to those that can be treated algebraically.

Mathematical objects are NOT the substance of the Universe. Space and time and its energetic combinations quantised in momenta is.

But we concede of all the mind-mirror languages to perceive reality mathematics specially in space themes (logic of verbal thought in time) is the best. This means the proper way to do physics IS from ∆@$≈ð, into mathematical physics, and that is what we shall do here.

We are not obviously in this second line post of introduction to 5D physics make an encyclopaedia of ever more complex ‘inflationary’ mathematical physics but study some ‘case examples’ to illustrate how to go from ∆@$≈ð 5 dimensions of scalar entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space emotions, iterations and time warping into mathematical physics to extract its whys.

I shall remind you that is how you start, simple, with Ptolemaic simplification into mere copernican cycles, with Einstein’s special relativity whose maths were so simple Minkowski quipped it was high school stuff. But as those simple maths illuminated so much conceptual righteousness in different ages of wrong conceptual physics, we shall go in the ‘third relativity’ r=evolution, that of absolute relativity (of motion and form of scale of topology, of being), if we were to use the naming for physical jargons of ∆@s≈ð, about the same way – just ‘seasoning’ conceptual righteousness with a few simple mathematical examples of physics that will resolve many conundrums.

All this leads to the realisation that the ego-centered paradox of mind-languages as all mirrors do ALWAYS distort reality to accommodate the deformed perspective of the mind. And so our interest here is to make objective conceptual corrections and illustrate the correspondence between ∆@$≈t 5 Dimensions of entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space, iterative presents and cyclical time.

 Indeed, why huminds (physicists being just huminds watching physical systems)  are so one-dimensional. In this case because of the worldly profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons, as we discuss elsewhere. But the cause is deeper, and has to do with ‘creationist egos’ – that is the digital language huminds use to describe in abstract with limited properties the physical Universe.

 

The limits of physics, regarding the ABCD of the scientific method.

Science requires four steps as we explain in epistemology: gathering Accurate data (A), explaining it with sound models (which we deem B-iological), cast data into Cyclical patterns (laws of science) and use it for the benefit of all mankind (D-emocratic use of science).

Humans Physics however does not fare very well in some of those elements.

Physicists use the experimental method but due to a lack of direct evidence of most physical systems, and denial by anthropocentrism of mind-singularities and organic properties in those systems, reduce by dogma enormously the range of its inquire.

This is not an exaggeration. The main reason we cannot see physical systems as organic systems are the limits and dogmas of physics in their application of the scientific model, which they stop on phase 2.
They gather information but limited in the dark universe and smallish scales. Then they just try to fit it into some mathematical structure, data, but as mathematical systems are hardly understood in experimental terms, the result is lacking whys, meaning and what they don’t know they shun off as irrelevant.
The second phase of the scientific method, to find ‘models’ that make sense in a logic, bio-logic manner is not there. The third element, predictability however happens perfectly as what they study IS ONLY motion in space, and MOTION, we shall see is reproduction of information, the MOST exact process, an essence of reality. So as accurate as the reproduction of DNA is, the reproduction of a wave IS also exact.
But it is not called reproduction. As efficient as the reproduction of a bacteria is, the reproduction of quarks is BUT IT IS NOT CALLED REPRODUCTION.
There is where reason stops and dogma sets in. WHY THE REPRODUCTION OF QUARKS IS NOT REPRODUCTION!! I used to ask this in congress, and i would just get a smile at best. But again, my answer would be: it is the physicist who is NOT free. Who cannot think out of the anthropomorphic box.  So even before we attempt even to explore the Universe of 5D³=11Dimensions and its scalar fractal super organisms of space-time we must explain the ‘wrong approach to a philosophy of the Universe’ of physicists.

Of course mathematical physics, notably analysis of ∫∂ 4D and 5D flows and planes and group symmetry are essential tools to perceive T.œs with huminds, but the problem of creationist physics is to reduce reality to what those mathematical operations can extract and ignore all other propertiesdue to the ignorance of the Disomorphisms of all ST systems. To avoid those shortcomings we will emphasise the parallel study of abstract analysis with vital geometry and the functions hidden in the ternary parts of a system (membrane, vital space, singularity) which are at play in all physical phenomena.

While there ARE AS we have seen some advances on physics with the study of geometric simple motions and bidimensional orbits (Descartes, Galileo and Kepler, whose laws are studied in the posts of algebraic geometry and cosmology), the reductionist but exhaustive analysis of the locomotions of the Universe did start with analysis, in the work of Newton and Leibniz. So we can make a rather pedestrian statement (: for the arrogant physicist, who thinks to be such a high IQ, superior human thinker ):

‘Physics is basically the application of analysis to the study of one of the 5 motions of the Universe, locomotions≈translations in space’.  And while the mathematical methods used in physics have greatly expanded in the XX c. analysis reminds the core of mathematical physics. And this is the strongest proof of a 5th dimension in physical systems.

Since differential equations deal ‘obviously’ with the relationships of ∆-1 finitesimals and ∆-wholes, whereas instead of infinitesimals we use a more correct non-abstract concept of a minimal quanta of space-time, which is what we integrate socially either in space as a population/network or in time as a worldcycle/event. It follows immediately that ‘well behaved’ differential functions will require the full ternary elements of any Universal system, as follows:

$pe: ∫° membrane/boundaries/limits of the equation in time (duration) or space (extension)

∆: ds dt: ∆1 -scalar, minimal bit of time-in/form/ation or bite of entropic energy-space

ðiƒ: The logic synoptic, mathematical calculus as a discipline that selects the information of the system.

ST: The function we integrate within the ∫ST∂ system.

@: singularity points and discontinuities, which cannot integrate the function. What is then the Tiƒ, informative element? The result of this calculus ‘integrates’ the whole

In that regard another fundamental quality of integrals in physics is the existence of boundaries and membranes when we want to obtain exact real solutions. Most of mathematical physics thus deal with ∆st full systems. Indeed, we cannot solve clearly from thermodynamic to electromagnetic waves,  from quantum to orbital, mass equations, when they are not clearly contained into a limiting domain/external membrane; and focused into a single or bidimensional singularity, source of the forces; which encircle together a present space-time where the exchanges of energy and information and its variations studied by differential equations occur.

Finally it is also a key element of mathematical physics, the constant S≈T symmetries, shown in the partial equations, which differentiate ceteris paribus in time and space (∂s∂t), or in the duality of derivatives in time (speed, acceleration) and its inverse integrals in space which gives us distance.

As those general concepts of Analysis and its relationship with the 2 fundamental elements of reality, the ∆-scales of finitesimals and wholes, and the ST symmetries and dualities have wider applications to all other stiences they are studied in the posts of Analysis, so we shall just mentioned them here.

Creationist physics is not merely a philosophical question. It has deep consequences for all points of view of research.

Consider the case of quantum creationism. As we have to normalize to value 1 the probabilistic view of the density of electric charge of a Schrodinger’s equation (which by measure theory merely means to reduce the 1-∞ spatial scale to the o-1 time-sphere), an astounding cumbersome technique must be developed, which ‘hides’ a lot of information by transforming quantum reality into a certain mental mirror. And all kind of deformations have carried through the century into many applications of quantum physics, which time permitted we will analyze in the fourth line. FACT is the proper pilot-wave theory would have allowed a much faster understanding of the laws of physics, as explained in those texts.  Of course today computers carry out all the calculations so it seems not to matter but it certainly does.

Creationism also limits and makes unnecessary this blog – as the believer is NOT going to wonder how God creates the mathematical Universe but merely search his wording which is taken as in the case of religion in a literalist way. ALL stops in the search for the ultimate equation of Unification of forces, because after all God is one (in the western tradition).

Further on as God must be complicated, superior in intelligence, the search for complex equations are important. Now, all this is a priori subconscious thought but very real underlying the kind of arguments there have been in history of thought between the 3 masters of the space-time view of the Universe and the 3 masters of the parallel creationist view, which we shall summarise in these blogs.  To notice also that HUMANS due to their ego paradox, as ‘homunculus minds’ are built to be ‘creationists’ and worship machines and huge ego-trips so the realists, we all have been ignored and are still ignored when disputing with the creationists. Good luck infinitesimal egos who think to be infinite.

Relational space-time: ternary symmetries; duality of motion x form = dimensions & energy worldcycles.

The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO the arrow of growth of ENTROPY or expansive open disordered motions, and accelerated TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to the arrow of growth of information carried in the frequency and form of the  accelerated cycles of charges and masses, (Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass)  and its conserved closed, repetitive ENERGY cycles, whose minimal unit is momentum, combination of mass/charges=accelerated time clocks x speed-distances (entropic motions).

So those are the 3 arrows of space-time that create reality of which we are all made, including humans, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’.

We shall thus study the physical ternary systems, or ‘space-time organisms’, which are the fundamental particle in the Universe, and co-exist also in physical ternary scales.

It is though necessary to be aware of the distortions of the mind both in the measure of those physical systems that ‘dwindle’ and ‘increase its errors’ as we go through the scalar dimensions of the Universe, in different fashion upwards and downwards, and the duality of motion and ‘linguistic form’ of the mind, which establishes key paradoxes to understand the dimensions of the Universe.

In essence, the human being limits its perception of those far away physical systems, to the simple dimensions of space-time: pure form, and motion, treating all particles as points, as if they didn’t have inner dimensions (except in the duality of open space and closed time strings, with its 10 dimensions, which closely resembles a pure ∆st analysis of reality, as it is void of experimental distorting influences). So philosophically we must wonder if the galaxy-atom, our limits which are perceived similarly are ‘seen so similar’ because that is how the mind distorts reality as we travel away from the self-centred human thermodynamic scale.

In any case, the space-time method, as opposed to the mathematical and verbal method, IS more complex because it goes A LEVEL OF DEPTH below that of language, to study how languages distorts a background space-time reality.

It is also more accurate as it includes those distortions, and recognising them, ads the sentient properties huminds only recognise to the very close similar species (higher mammals) and the biological organic properties derived of the co-existence of multiple planes, joined by networks and singularity membrains, which physicists do not recognise.

So the method we shall consider to study all those systems will be completely different to that of physicists or religious people, which start from a dogmatic acceptance that the language per se is the origin of reality, so the religious man studies the ‘sacred scriptures’ and the physicist, the ‘sacred equations of mathematics’ IN THE VERSION UTTERED by the prophet, not joking here. 

As mathematics has NOT YET being fully evolved as we shall do in this blog, to give vital properties to systems. It is then necessary to depart for a full understanding of nature in 3 steps before making equations of physics, steps underlying the proper scientific method escaped by physicists:

  • FIRST TO consider the properties of space time, its ternary symmetries, ternary time§paœrganisms, and the general laws that rule them across ∆-scales, S-topologies and t-ages; and how its singularity ‘membrains enclose’ inwards and outwards those open ‘balls’.
  • Then we need to evolve further vital mathematics to properly account for those ‘fundamental particles’, the time§paœrganisms (ab.T.œ), in a more proper way by adapting the space continuum to the fractal structure of reality, which we can easily achieve by completion of the non-euclidean revolution started by lobachevski and Riemann and Einstein in physics. So we shall define a fractal point of dimension 1, a line-wave, a network plane, relative similarity instead of congruence, and the mind as a point crossed by infinite parallels of entropy and information, transforming the abstract point into a time§paœrganism, T.œ. And affirm that T.œ is a theory of everything organic, and everything is a T.œ or part of one such Time§paœrganisms.
  • We can then study the isomorphic laws of those T.œs, as they are common to all systems, derived of the 4 components of all beings, @-linguistic minds, space topologies, time ages and scales, which we roughly subdivide in 3 sub-elements for a total of 12 sets of laws, enough to enclose all the laws, parts and events of every T.œ of the Universe.
  • Only then equipped with the proper understanding of T.œ and its non-Æ mathematical and ternary logic formalism we can study physics, and we shall do it not from equations upwards, but from those T.œ, the photon, atom, molecule, matter state and gravitational being, and its vital isomorphic laws, which then can be described analytically in its actions, parts, co-existing flows and networks with mathematical tools of measure, to differentiate them and know its details.

But as we said the 3 masters of space-time science had a hard time and ultimately were ignored. Leibniz was ignored in his confrontation with Newton and moreover accused of Plagiarism for his much deeper analysis of calculus and left abandoned in his old age by his king-employer, in one of the most shameful episodes of human history. Einstein was massacred along De broglie by the creationists, Heisenberg and Bohr and Pauli, despite being right defending quantum realism and pilot-wave theory and not even when his A-bomb gave him enormous prestige, he was respected. The FBI opened a file when he became pacifist. Again, the Homunculus mind is about handy  machines, small conceptual brain and hyperbolic thought. And we deal with those a priori structures of humans in our sections on history and economics.

A better definition of mathematical physics… will then be, departing from space-time properties:

“Mathematical Physics is the analysis of the 5 Space-time Dimensions, 3 topologies, 3 time states, and 10 Social Scales of the 3 perceived physical planes of reality, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational planes, through its a(nti)symmetric mathematical operators: ±, x÷, √ xª, ∫ ∂.”

This is then what we shall study, time permitted in the future with increasing detail first in the sub post to this one, and the 4th line. Of course, that is not what mathematical physics is today, which basically consists in the analysis of the 5 parameters humans measure, lineal distance, L, lineal time, T, Mass and Charge (1D vortices of the gravitational and quantum scale) and its Universal constants (a specific symmetry, which we shall discuss in those posts)… and really I used to write my post departing from that mess, but as I said, given my infamous activism against the accelerator industry I will remain invisible among the community ‘live or dead’ so frankly as of 2018 starting tomorrow, I am going to take a bit more seriously the posts of astrophysics, and maths, which after all are the ones I enjoy more and write them as if the messy world of physicists had never started with Galileo’s deformation of lineal time in his master opus ‘ballistics’. AI or XXI c. Asian thinkers will be very grateful if we survive.

In that regard, I have to get back the 11 annotated books of Lindau’s awesome encyclopaedia of mathematical physics where I annotated all his work in my youth and the notebooks I recall to write… 30 years ago that must be somewhere at 40-0 parallel and if I find them, mathematical physics will be reborn and Galileo a note foot on the III millennia (: and if not, not.

The 2 philosophies of the science of timespace.

We shall thus in this post consider the evolution of science that passes as always every century through the evolution of our understanding of its first substances time and space (from XVI-XVII: Descartes->Galileo, to XVIII:  Leibniz vs. Newton, to XIX: Darwin vs. religion, to XX-XXI: Einstein->Sancho), which has two fundamental views:

The physicists’ view of a single abstract timespace, with a single clock for the entire universe, the mechanical clock, that measures a single arrow of future time, the arrow of entropy, disorder expansion in space and death, which starts and ends in a constant big-bang explosion that erases the information of life and the Universe. Time is then ‘what the clock measures’ (Einstein) and obviously it is spoken in the digital language of clocks.

This view appeared only with the invention of mechanical clocks, the development of the Cartesian graph that uncoiled the cyclical form of a clock into a line, latter extended mathematically to infinity, and the discovery in the analysis of a local phenomena of entropy – the disordered heat of steam machines…

And it requires two ‘dogmas’ that ‘reduce’ sciences to this view and are called by philosophers of science, ‘reductionism‘ (only mathematical measures of time taken with the human-mechanical standard of a single clock, with a second unit that is our human heart-step-eye-thought rhythm matter, all other forms of measure of time=change are irrelevant; and all other time clocks must be ‘reduced’ to the human time clocks which is also the clock of the Universe); and naive realism (only what we can see and measure with our visual intruments matter).

IT WAS only on those basis that the big-bang theory of the Universe could be born, by disregarding absolutely every other form of time=change, every other arrow of time=change notably the energetic and informative arrows of the vortices of galaxies that ‘compress vacuum space into matter’ (‘time bends space into masses’ Einstein); and finally by disregarding 96% of the Universe of dark energy and dark matter (remember those are NOT arrows/substances of time-space for ‘entropy’ only physicists.

Hence the present mess about big-bang theory where the proofs that deny it, the things that are not explained by it, are overwhelming. Yet BECAUSE physicists will defend its dogmas with a very non-scientific sanguine, bully behaviour full of systemic insults against the ‘intelligence of other sciences’, the ‘knowledge of philosophers of science’, the self-importance of their discoveries, on my view copycatted of the bullying of its ’employees’, the military of the weapon industry where till the explosion of the electronic consumer industry 70% of them worked; there is no way to argue with them reasonably on timespace theory.

So plainly speaking NEVER from ‘here to eternity’ there will be a physicist who truly advances further time theory.

As what he studies is only a type of time change, translation in space, defined by an equation which uses time-change only to measure those changes in space motion, v=∂s/∂t, ∂t=v/∂s, where each ‘instant of time’, ∂t is defined as the measure of change in speed or position in space.

This time-change measure has been exhausted ad limit by physicists, conceded. There is nothing more thoroughly researched with the liberal help of the military-industrial complex, since Galileo defined time in those terms to measure shots of cannonballs for the arsenal of Venice, than motion in space.

Einstein took it to the limit by defining precisely that change in very fine ‘pictures’ of present, simultaneous space-time, adding a correcting factor to Galileo’s relativity, c²t², to account for the deformations happening at very fast motions; but NOTHING of the other type of changes and perceptions of time notably biological, informative time changes were added to the ‘soup’.

So physicists know all about time-change in space but they cannot make a philosophy of time, because they have ‘reduced’ time to that partial element of change, they have eliminated all languages which are NOT digital to measure time change, notably the logic of the 3 timespace arrows past, present and future, better explained with verbal logic.

Only a philosopher of science considers all the changes together and ads the logic of verbal thought and its 3 past-present-future verbs to explain time.

As mathematics IS better as a language to mirror space, geometry and points, though it can mirror time through sequential numbers, the loss is specially clear in the understanding of causality and time logic, which physicists finally abandoned for the false concept of ‘probability’, which has basically eliminated the key element to understand sequential events in time, causality, whose logic is NOT Simple aristotelian causality, as there are 3 arrows of time that mix together to create events.

TO MARRY MATHEMATICS AND ORGANISMS THROUGH NON-Æ FORMALISM.

“As he aged, he pursued his scientific inquiries  out of a joyful instinct to fathom the profound beauties of creation. His curiosity was pure, personal, and delightfully obsessive.” Walter Isaacson. “Leonardo”

‘Why we should buy your ugly mechanical clocks when we have all the clocks of nature to measure our vital cycles’ Taoist master, to the British Embassy to the celestial Empire.

Reductionism vs. relational space-time. 

Physicists have a ‘conceptual error’ in their analysis of reality. They do NOT think that reality is made of ‘its primary substances’, vital space with motion, which last a finite duration of cyclical time, whose geometric and logic properties, all entities of nature perceive with different languages of space-time measure – so for example humans measure space with eyes and perceive time with words  and its 3 ‘tenses’ of past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of time.

For physicists since the wrong interpretation of quantum physics became dogma, the language of mathematics creates reality, in a similar fashion to the theory of reality of abrahamic religions, in which ‘the word’ (arab in islam) creates reality. So god spoke arab and ‘created things naming them in arab’. For physicists god creates things uttering equations. And so Newton affirmed that a mathematical tool, the cartesian graph, in which the cycles of time had been uncoiled and fusion into a long line in the paper-axis, to measure better lineal motions (v=s/t) WAS THE ONLY CLOCK of time of the Universe, which became then ‘lineal, infinite and with the single beat of the mechanical clock’.

This astounding deformation of THE DEEP meanings of time, became a dogma, which facilitated measures of ‘motions in space’, to the extreme detail achieved by physicists and heralded as absolute genius – so when Einstein refined further this limited formula of time, to achieve even more exact measure of motions, he was considered the most intelligent man on earth.

FACT THOUGH is that measuring spatial distances and speeds IS not all what matters to reality; and ‘reductionism’ of time to space measuring negating all other ‘forms of change’, notably change in the in/form/ation of beings, studied by biology and evolution is a blunt error that has endured for centuries halting the understanding by mankind of those fundamental principles.

It ended up also creating an absurd theory of reality and the meaning of it all, called ‘entropy’ according to which since all changes in nature have been reduced to change in motion, all what exists is a constant growth of motion, and disorder; and the origin of it all is a big-bang of motion.

Never mind Darwin found that the true important form of change in nature is the opposite evolution of ‘form’ of in-form-ation. Physicists shunned off this other form of change=time and call it negantropy, the negation of entropy. Never mind Einstein, showed that ‘time curves space into masses’, the cyclical eddies of space that convert lineal space into cyclical accelerated time clocks, which create the physical information of nature, in vortices of time called galaxies, in which we live – reason why we are also ruled NOT by motions in space but by biological processes of growth and evolution of information.

They denied the other physical arrow of time, informative masses, and came up with an absurd theory, according to which Einstein was wrong and masses are NOT accelerated vortices of time (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) but ‘again’ a collision between ‘something’ and a particle called the Higgs gave mass to the particle – no longer an intrinsic property of an eddie of time, which attracts as any eddie the faster it turns around in its cyclical clocks, but ‘something’ obtained by collisions. And finally they denied the most attractive, faster turning eddie of time, the black hole, and Hawking affirmed black holes are NOT vortices of time, because they ‘travel to the past’, and instead of attracting and dragging all what surrounds them to the vortex, as they move to the past, do exactly the inverse of what we see them doing – they evaporate and explode ‘again’ into a burst of entropy.

What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.

Let us then start with the FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE of 5D² – the duality of dimensions of space-time, and the dualities of continuity vs. discontinuity, linearity vs. cyclicality, which are the ternary i-logic relationships.

IN THIS introduction we will merely enunciate some of the main aspects of 5D² physics to be treated in more complex 4th line posts.

The previous graphs, studied in depth of its details and data in other posts, as this one is more focused on the philosophy of physics, and what it truly tells us about the Universe, as opposed to what physicists think they tell us, comes to the basics of the problems with physics, sciences and huminds in general – its bias and subjective, subconscious choice of data to cater theory – making opinion above facts, increasingly the more so in the age in which thought is provided by the computer modeling: gravitation is here the 1/2 missed; and scaling the reality the human ego doesn’t want to renounce – that absurd belief our scale of reality is more important than any other scale. This is perhaps the 3rd element besides the errors of ‘continuous space’ and ‘single lineal time’ – the ego paradox – that most handicaps our intelligence observing reality; and it affects specially Physicists as it did before them, Priests, since both ultimately sponsor ‘creationist’ theories of the Universe, based in the ‘language they speak’:

LET US explore them a more complex philosophy not only of physics but also of mathematics, to adequate mathematics to the study of the vital, organic properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

The Problem with physicists as self-named seers of time.

So the paradoxical Universe requires a paradoxical mind and man has not that mind, reason why for so long – 30 years and counting ∆º§t has merely given a headache to a few scholars but never quite made it. We are human o-points, the universe is ∞. A bit of humility though could help you to understand those paradoxes that are at the bottom line of reality as it is… not.

My experience though is that humans are irrational and will choose always egocy, the happiness of the ego over objective science regarding any model of reality that doesn’t make them the center of the Universe, and this we shall see when studying history and its super organisms is so essential to them that paradoxically makes them slaves of those higher structures.

In the next graph, the scalar Universe imposed absolute relativity as man is no longer the center of creation, but its Ƽ mind self-centered into the limits of its perception upside and downside, based in its need for meaningful actions of survival with upper worlds and lower pixels of energy and information make us feel so. Fact is we just see similar atom-galaxy limits because we are limited by them not because the Universe is bounded by them.

All what exists being homologic by virtue of possessing the same Dimensions in its organic form, and living similar worldcycles, albeit self-centred in different scales of the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe is absolutely relative, in an infinite whole, in which all beings are limited to 3 organic scales, 3 ages of time and 3 adjacent forms of space:

Galileo & Newton errors: Lineal single Mathematical time invents a background space-time.

Physicists use mathematics as the language to explore the Univese, which is good as it is a language that mirrors reality with enormous synoptic logic efficiency and it is extremely good to picture space, with its fundamental element the point, which must be upgraded from Euclid’s abstract definition of a point with no breath into the fractal definition of a non-Euclidean point which allows infinite parallels to cross, as it GROWS in size when we come closer to it BECOMING a whole being, star, cell, or individual. Once this correction is done we shall advance very fast on our sections of mathematical physics to explain all the equations with a more meaningful content.

This said because physicists IGNORE the fractal point, even if Einstein used it in a simpler version (Riemann) to study the geometry of the ‘enlarged’ gravitational world – when he used non-e geometry – they have a lot of errors in their understanding of physics, starting obviously by its ‘point-particles’, which enlarged will hold a lot of time cycles, aka strings closed and spaces-distances-lineal motion strings.

But so far they have no idea on how to do this. So what they did, as they believe maths is the only language and it is better described with a cartesian graph, is to convert the cartesian continuous graph of maths into the REAL SPACETIME! And so since newton they think there is a background space-time, the cartesian graph over which God which is a mathematician, draws its beings. And of course, since the Universe is a fractal of space-time, once they have missed the fractal structure of non-e points, and reduced time to the ‘line’ of the cartesian graph, a single dimension of lineal time appeared and from then on, most physicists never quite got what they were talking about.

We have thus first to explain this mathematical religion of physicists that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts It is also the origin of the biggest blunder regarding time-space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’.

All this said Absolute relativity also rejects creationism in physics – the belief all mathematical equations are truth. Not so, monad-points with still languages have slightly different mirrors, always with less information and properties than the whole. So mathematics in physics require experimental evidence.

Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, On verbal fantasies,  just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

Creationism mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.

Let us then once we have gone from mathematical physics into T.Œ go the other way around, starting from the whole – the organic paradigm and the description of ALL the scales of the 5th dimension with the same laws, the larger reality back to the detailed systems enclosed within that larger world.

Which is the way stience should be taught, not the way physicists pretend, from its quantum scales upwards, and using only its reductionist, mathematical laws and lineal thought.

Since this is the hidden censorship that have delayed for so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion.

‘Military physicists’, as opposed to the pure thinkers of this discipline, carried the day with power and  canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be  ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

And indeed, lineal time motions were instrumental to the development of ‘ballistics’ (the first name of the book of Galileo on physics), and the degradation of our understanding of time, hand in hand with the mechanical clock who established a single tick for the entire Universe, that of the mechanical machine.But as I know 99% will leave the blog, if i just keep criticizing those obvious falsities, as ‘believers in lineal time physics’, I GIVE  the benefit of DOUBT to open-minded physicists who really care and reason truth, and do put many candies≈solutions to the ultimate questions on this introduction.

Religious creationists vs. realist scientists.
Creationism of any type puts the language above the physical reality it mirrors. In reality the Ƥt, scalar, topological and multi-causal properties of space-time are the origin of reality, which mathematics mirrors best specially for Ƥ properties, and logic for temporal ones.
In the graph we see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

In the graph, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.

Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: iinflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. 

The modern error: Hilbert’s arrogant idealism: i imagine points.

Then there is cultural error, hauling from German Idealism, which brought us Nazism, Communism and Physical theories of Platonic numbers creating the Universe without substance, breaking the FIRST AND FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, ‘experimental evidence’ also called ‘hylomorphism’, which since Aristotle applies: You cannot have a real event/form without a substance, or ‘∆-1 parts’ that make them possible.

Yet in Germany at the turn of the century in the paroxysm of the idealist culture, it was supposed that the ‘language of maths, hence the mind of man created the Universe’, not the other way around (languages are mirrors of a real substance).

So physicists got away with murder (the killing of real substances) under the influence of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, which unable to grasp Lobacjevski’ pan geometry of non-euclidean fractal points, resolved here, said the postulates of geometry had to be substituted by the concept the mathematician ‘imagined points and lines’, and constructed the world from the mind out. It is the same concept of religion, in which GOD ‘SPEAKS’ words and when he speaks, he creates. So Allah or Yhwh says ‘man’ and man zas! appears, and Hilbert, the God of mathematicians (the language of god in Galileo’s tantrum) said ‘I imagine lines’ and zas! lines be=come’ LOL.

So without the need for ‘real substances’ both Bohr and Einstein became also imaginary, ‘postulating people’; that is people who ‘imagine’ postulates without proof as certain and zas! 100 years latter, nobody dares to explain why the postulate of constancy of c-speed and what is even worse, the never said by Einstein, limit of c-speed which only applies within light space-time (the ∆-3 scale of galaxies) MUST have a logic rational substance-oriented cause, as we shall explain here with GST laws; and why quantum waves are NOT imaginary probabilities but as Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bell->Bohm clarified densities of a fractal electron made of its ∆-1 relative cellular parts (ultra dense photons that collapse an ST wave of light into particle, Tiƒ state). 

(The quantum realist interpretation is there for 100 years, so we don’t innovate just enlighten it. The proper interpretation of the c-speed postulate and its limiting application to the ∆>-3 scales is an immediate offshoot of the stop and go, Tiƒ>Spe rhythm of motion and so it is ‘new≈blue’ GST at its best)

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell.

It is then quite obvious that a full thorough analysis of the equations of mathematical physics with the tools of 5D³ and its concepts behind – the fundamental particle of the Universe, the ternary decametric supœrganism; its worldcycles of energy and its units of actions in time and ∆-1 parts in space would require the rewriting into a full new encyclopaedia of all the analysis of classic physics, which naive realism (what you measure is all what there is) and reductionism (only mathematical parameters that matter to us mostly related to motion ‘ARE’ physics) which is well beyond the life of a single researcher – specially a latino lazy cow like myself 🙂 so we just will do some fast review of the key equations of physics and study its ‘hidden meaning’ ignored by ‘reductionism and naive realism’.

Science specially astrophysics with its ‘belief’ in the precision of its measures as if there were a single scale, and the rod of measure – in our case c-constant light, our pixel of eye-brain information – as if were the only universal rod – reduces by definition reality to such a limited conceptual a priori statement on the fundamental principles that any serious philosophy of reality becomes impossible.

So by discharging with a priori statements and lack of conceptual definitions, more comprehensive concepts of language, perception, time, space, scale and motion, physics is specially immune to any philosophical arguments, which are NO longer relevant because A) cannot be digitalized always B) talk of different concepts of time and space.

Essentially physicists don’t care then for all other realities, not even for the proper conceptualizations of its terms, which they have reduced to v=s/t type of equations.

In that regard, what humans seem to forget is that physics was NEVER originated in philosophy or even science, but in the arsenal of Venice where for 1000 golden ducats Galileo was charged with finding the longest, entropic lineal motion of gunboats…

This Praxis of ‘making machines’, measuring things and plugging results in mathematical equations to ‘predict’ the locomotion and energy of systems is all what a physicist normally care. So amazing as it seems a serious philosophy of the Universe and a stringent analysis of the theories we have and the elements we lack in them is done with little rigor in physics, compared to the precision with expect from microscopic measures and the study of known-known laws of locomotion.

As this is a blog of philosophy of science first, applied to each science latter, this brings a big gap between physics and ‘science’, because we need to CHANGE the a priori statements of physics.

If we add that we live in a technological civilisation, where machines are our ‘worshipped’ god, and Physicists make them, the ego paradox of power prevents physicists to exercise a healthy criticism to his approach to knowledge. And then in a personal note as an activist against the Nuclear Industry, physicists tend not to listen to my work.

All this said, if we depart as we always do from a more objective non-human approach to ‘stiences’, astrophysics is essentially one of the 3 fundamental fields of stience, and as such we shall learn a lot of homologic laws that applied to all sciences by studying astrophysics and vice versa, by applying the better understood organic, homologic laws of biology to astrophysical organisms and the sentient properties of human minds to physical singularities once we correct the underlying deformation of lineal physics and adopt the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space, we will be able to fully upgrade the discipline and explain most of the unknown whys of its systems.

Constraining mathematical creationism with empiricism, simplicity and first principles.

Einstein’s most original contribution to twentieth-century philosophy of science lies elsewhere, iis his distinction between what he termed “principle theories”, we shall call ‘constrains’ and “constructive theories.”

A constructive theory provides a constructive model for the phenomena of interest. Examples include the first and second laws of thermodynamics.

Ultimate understanding requires a constructive theory, but often, says Einstein, progress in theory is impeded by premature attempts at developing constructive theories in the absence of sufficient constraints by means of which to narrow the range of possible of constructive. It is the function of principle theories to provide such constraint, and progress is often best achieved by focusing first on the establishment of such principles.

According to Einstein, that is how he achieved his breakthrough with the theory of relativity, which, he says, is a principle theory, its two principles being the relativity principle and the light principle.

We consider therefore the 11 Ðisomorphisms and 5 Ðimotions of scalar, time space, the ‘principles’ that shall constrain all other theories of stience.

This is specially necessary in physics where mathematical creationism sponsors an opposite view – that all what is written with equations must be real.

Instead we require both experimental evidence and constrains provided by empiricism and the Ðisomorphisms of space-time.

As Einstein put it ‘Physics is real. I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ – hence the need for empiricism.

While his other ‘fundamental view of philosophy of science, economy and logical simplicity (Ockham’s razor) is played by the Disomorphic laws.

Let us consider then first some basic ‘logic’ principles of the structure of the Universe.

 

®LGEBRA

Mathematics as a mirror of the Dimotions and scales of reality.

We translate in this post and subposts mathematics to 5D.

And to do so, as a fractal can always be divided in sub-fractals, mathematical disciplines subdivide further at all levels in 5 elements connected not so much with the 5 Ðimotions of existence, but with its 5 structural elements, ∆@s≤≥t, scales, minds, space, time and its a(nti)symmetries.

It follows then from the definition of the 5 elements of all systems, an immediate classification of the five fundamental sub disciplines of mathematics specialised in the study of each of those 5 dimensions of space-time:

Ultimately as the language of the Galatom, mathematics IS necessarily a language able to mirror the structural elements of the galatom and all its fractal inner parts.

EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA (ab.¾)

How ¬Æ reflects the ∆@st elements of reality.

Next we can consider how ¬Æ mirrors the fundamental elements of reality with its fundamental ‘synoptic’ forms, as all language reduces reality to lesser mirror-parts that carry not all its information:

  • S: A point is the first perception of A T.Œ in mathematical ‘space’, which as we come closer acquires content. And then its next degree of complex description occurs:
  • ∆: A number, is a social group of undistinguishable ‘internal’ parts of a point, which represents the point in scale. And then the next degree of complex analysis occurs:
  • T: An operand expresses the transformation of a point through a Dimotion of timespace, and since there are five Dimotions, 3 continuous Dimotions in a single plane (perception, locomotion, reproduction) and 2 discontinuous Dimotions that start and end in different planes (entropy and social evolution) we shall find 5 basic operators of those Dimotions in any ‘algebraic structure’ that truly reflects the being in the mathematical mirror.
  • @: A frame of reference expresses those changes through = equations reflects the @ element of the being.

THE WHOLENESS OF THE GENERATOR of EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

A definition of the Universe.

All this said, we make a definition of the fractal Universe suited to its mathematical description.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   Asymmetries between its 4 components,  T, ∆, @, S,which can either annihilate or evolve together, through parallel =symmetric or Perpendicular/antisymmetric communication:
  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: Planes of size distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ðime cycles:  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, those elements and its operandi.

In mathematics, with the duality of inverse operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª and ∫∂, and the universal ≤≥ symbols that put in relationship two sides of timespace event that connects adjacent, simultaneous parts of a super organism in space, or ‘moves’ and transforms a t.œ in time. So Dimotions are presented by those operand, and functions connected by similarity operand (<=>) express the connection of adjacent topologies in space: |<ø>O.

The humind plays a key role in all this game, as we can only perceive through the languages of the mind, which ‘perceive in themselves’ as ‘still-simultaneous-linguistic mapping’. WE DO NOT PERCEIVE REALITY BUT LANGUAGES-MIRRORS, we often confuse with reality (Mind paradox).

We thus define in existential algebra the main operators of classic algebra as the two directions of a dimotion of space-time. We can in this manner compactify some dimensions as inverse, being entropy and generation (4th and 5th Dimotions) inverse in symmetry to a given ∆º plane (±¡ SYMMETRY).

To which extent we can consider stop and motion, 1D and 2 D inverse or rather asymmetric, must be dealt on a one case basis. Finally as it turns out we need the other four Ðimotions to achieve the 3rd Ðimotion of reproduction, we can reduce all other Ðimotions to reproduction; hence establishing the unity of intent in the Universe: to keep reproducing an eternal present. IT is this present-eternal reproductive Ðimotion what defines the Universe as a fractal.

The generator equation of Existential algebra is then any of the multiple representations with those simple symbols of Dimotions of Timespace Organisms, that is any Ð function of the game of existence – of travels through the 5 Dimotions of space-time, performed by any T.oe.

Death then exists, as a partial equation of the Generator according to ¬Æ rules: BY MERELY extracting an inverse partial equation from Γ.œ:

∆+1 Tƒ<<∆-1: $p; that is the mind-whole of the ∆+1 scale dissolves bak to its minimal parts, the spatial past, lineal entropic ∆-1 elements.

Thus the symbols of the generator, which encode both the metric of 5D, the ternary topologies of supœrganisms, the ages of time AND in its operandi, the past to future, present to past, present to future, future to past flows of entropy, energy and information, define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the co-invariant laws of space-time beings.

We can of course being as pedantic and obscure, as complex in our other languages reflection of the Generator as we want when entering in details.

But ultimately in the final synopsis, all reduces to the ternary topological temporal and scalar ‘invariances’ of the generator as it reflects all possible arrows and forms of scalar Timespace (causal chains, sequential ages, topological ensembles, etc), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

So we shall close this introductory note, with a consideration on the philosophical question of the limits of reality.

Now we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality has proved to be truth:

‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,

Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.

So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject  (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…

It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.

 

This said, mathematics will still be considered the best mirror to study the dimensions of space-time, and its algebraic symmetries, group varieties, and analytical motions… Where operations will be the fundamental element to express those motions and symmetries.

Regarding the mirror languages that express those dimensions, as the most useful is mathematics – NOT the substance of reality, which is space and time, but its best mirror, the 5 mathematical operations that define most often those dimensions are as follows:

1D and 2 D | and O lineal and cyclical bidimensional space-times are ‘SUMS of NUMBERS’, each one a social being, most likely in its perfect form prime polygons, which become indistinguishable cyclical points, with its capacity to reproduce internally vertex:

Prime polygons able to multiply internally, invaginating the vital space till creating a mirror image, the mind-singularity in its center, are the most indistinguishable groups of points, the geometric equivalent to sequential, temporal numbers. As all other numbers can be a product of primes – the most efficient social configurations, the best mirror-image of the social growth of ‘lineal and cyclical points’ are numbers and its social sums.

3D: RE-product-ION. As the hidden wisdom of the verbal language understands the Product is the essential algebraic operation of the second §‡ dimension of iterative O x | = Ø combinations of the being.

5D: Entropy, Derivatives which divide a whole till finding its ‘finitesimal indivisible quanta’ are the natural operation of ‘Space’ in the fourth dimension as it finds that minimal ∆-1 form. On the other hand, contrary to belief, polynomials, power laws ARE the time operation of decay and death of inverse exponential growth – as exponential growth do not exist since the energy to feed reproduction is limited but departing from a huge number of ∆-1 wholes it is quite easy to produce a massive decay, reason why negative exponentials are used in all decay functions.

4D: social evolution. It follows that the exact inverse operations of 5D will be those of the 4th dimension of social growth: integrals in space of ∆-1 quanta, and logarithmic FUNCTIONs in time, which are used for logistic equations of growth.

So we have found as we shall constantly do a Disomorphic (Dimensional isomorphism=equality) correspondence that carries the 5 Dimensions into the 5 mirror algebraic operations and its inverse (operandi in Latin also used as a synonymous in our attempt to create a slightly different jargon for common terms of ‘science’ when doing ‘stience’).

Thus we can reduce the mathematical language operations, its knots and bolts to the 5 Dimensions of reality:

The generator equation.

So WE write the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its space-time combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:

Γ. Generator:           Toroid $p(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ∑∏(exi) (repetitive waves-bodies) > Spherical ðƒ (head Particles)

Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.

Or as Cheng-Tzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yang-line of energy and the yin-information, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.

(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)

So I could classify all the different space-time beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.

Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms:

It is clear that Informative Time, It, is far more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.

Those cyclical ðƒ-particles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.

It does not matter so much that forms become ever more complex, as topological knots become convoluted, but the functions of those networks remain. They become the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:

$p; Digestive-energetic network of Non-AE points < ∑∏: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: ðƒ

So now with those basic clarifications we can study through its 10 isomorphisms some of the key elements of those physical systems in 5D space-time.

immortal Universe: a zero sum that conserves its Se<≈>ðƒ elements. Entropy (S∂)Mass (ðiƒ)  

As 5D and time are symmetries that increase information and decrease entropy contrary to belief the universe does warp energy into form and so it dies, since 2 symmetries (time cycles and 5 D=evolution) increase form, and only one (space motions) decrease it.

An example is the duration of life and death:

While the life-information-evolution arrow lasts its maximal timespace quanta warping the being in a point of space for ‘very long’, the arrow of death

-entropy last a single quantum of timespace, exploding in that ‘microtime’ the entity in maximal space (i.e. big-bang micro-time, anti-particle erasing.)

Yet the sum of both: ∑ ‘Max. T. x Min. S’ + ‘Max. S x Min. T’ is a zero sum for the total 5D space-time of the Universe.

So the Universe is conserved, BECAUSE DEATH erases both 5D Times – the worldcycle of information AND the social evolution of the being.

Further on since the Universe is made of formal motions it is immortal and motion never ceases – only reverses its arrow from information to entropy in the act of death (or vice versa as Mehaute proved in chemical processes, in the creation of crystals) the Universe is immortal. From this fact it comes both the Absolute relativity of space-time in each scale, which merely inverts its arrows and the relative infinity of motions in the 5th dimension, which merely ‘wobble’ up an down. And from this absolute relativity derives the isotropy and isomorphism of both, from where it derives in the conservation principles of Physics:

Conservation of lineal momentum and kinetic energy vs. Conservation Tƒ: angular momentum and potential energy, which in most events of physical measure derives in the laws of least action (Hamiltonian ≈ Lagrangian -> ∂H=0; steady points etc.

Γ. The Generator of physical systems and its 5D ST (anti)symmetries:

The Generator of Universal Planes, Time states and Space symmetries for all physical systems is a simple equation that resumes the spatial parts, temporal ages and co-existing 3 scales in which physical systems develop its cyclical space-time action – the events and motions in space, physicists study:

∆≤|3|:t$ (young, toroid gas, field)≤≥∏∑(present, iterative, liquid, boson wave)≤≥ð§(future, informative crystal/fermion)

The fundamental ‘Generator equation’ leads to the first differentiation of physical space-time systems in 3 5D planes according to the ternary principle:

  • -1 Electromagnetic, quantum plane: $t-field<∑∏-wave<ð§-particle; whose ternary asymmetry in space creates the atom.
  • ∆-Thermodynamic plane: $t-gas<∑e∏i-liquid>ð§-crystal; whose ternary asymmetry in space create geological planets.
  • ∆+1 Gravitational, cosmological plane of the galaxy: $t (strangelet halo); ∑∏(ud-quark stars), and §ð (top quark black holes), whose ternary antisymmetry in space creates the 3 galactic regions.
  • Thus  the most important ‘5D symmetry’ is the social growth of mass in 3 families of particles, the parts of galactic wholes (the 3 families of cosmic bodies); of which there growing but not definitive evidence despite thetheoretical soundness of the model, studied in the previous Post (Galaxies).

Those 3 ternary differentiations of the 3 Q-1>T>G+1 scales of matter (field-waves-particles; gas-liquid-solid; ud, strangelet, top quark hole regions of the galaxy) harmonizes the Universe.

The detailed analysis through the 10 isomorphisms 5 D fractal space-time cycles generate, of each of the parts of those equations 3 $t<>∑∏≤>ð§ regions/ ages/planes of 5D  physical systems truly resolves the whys and gives an architectonic perfect structure to the science of physics.

The 3 forms of space and the 3 motions of time.

So we can write a general equation, which is another ‘point of view’ on the ternary symmetry of the Universe, this time in terms of physical states of matter, for the ‘smallest quantum world’ and the ‘larger’ thermodynamic world of matter:

$t (gas, field spatial decelerating state) < ∑∏ (wave-liquid steady space-time) > ð§ (Particle-Solid, accelerated state).

And yet, most people will consider that a gas moves faster than a particle. Yes, indeed, externally, but we are talking here of the internal world of the particle, its vortex, its ‘hurricane’ of forces that creates it. Because the mind ‘fixes cyclical vortices’ of forces, masses and charges into a ‘form’. So we seem solid a very fast turning wheel, but it is made of turning spooks.

So the ambivalences of reality ARE ambivalences between the mind perception of form and the moving realities behind them. All the pictures we have of masses and charges so vortices of accelerated motion, and this was expressed by Einstein in his ill-understood Principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and masses and accelerated motions. Soon of course physicists who have this astounding capacity to define correctly with mathematical equations reality and then misunderstand it conceptually forgot what Einstein said and got back to their ‘lineal particle’ mantra as the cause of mass (but of course will not with the exception of Einstein, inspired by Mach, always fond of philosophy, ‘ask’, us philosophers of science.)

So there is here a contradiction: a time vortex because occupies little space, when not seen in detail seems a fixed form. Yet it is faster and its function, because it is faster is to enclose and tighten as a membrane the vital space of lineal entropic motions that want to escape, ‘collaborating’ with the ⊗-point mind at the center.

And this is the organic structure between the faster membrane and the central point of view that are in fact the ‘same being’, exploiting the entropic motions of its environment or territory. A shepherd does have a shepherd dog, which constantly moves faster than the sheep, the vital space they enclose. The dog is the time cycle, surrounding the vital sheep entropic energy, which the shepherd directs.

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system.

The 3 elements of the fractal paradigm: 5D Space-time.

So in space, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 parts that form a whole.

In time, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 space-time ages and its complex causality: Past-entropy->Present, reproduction of ExI->Future-Information << Past-entropy (Death)

And finally in 5D the new ternary complex principle is the co-existence of 3 scales of space-time together, with growingspatial size and diminishing speed in its time cycles.

5D physics thus is based in the 3 elements of the fractal paradigm:

  • The rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time.
  • But time cycles break space into an inner and outer reality. So the Universe is also made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).
  • Finally, those cycles are ordered by size in space and its opposite speed or frequency of its closed cycles, into a new 5th dimension with a generic metric: $t (spatial size) x ðƒ (time frequency) = ∆ (Constant).

That is smaller systems run faster informative cycles, and larger systems are slower. Yet the product of both parameters remains invariant, allowing travels through the 5th dimension, of organic nature.

But perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit.

THE PRINCIPLE Of conservation of energy and information… and energy.

The immediate consequence of the existence of those 3 arrows in all physical scales is the rewriting of the Principle of Conservation of energy:

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms locally back and forth from past entropy into future information: $<ei>ð”

We cannot repeat ad nausea the structure in space and time of the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational space time and the isomorphic laws derived of the ultimate substances of all relational space-time beings of the Universe, fractal space, cyclical time and its scales of size and clock speed – reason why the philosophy of stience is written in other post – the main one of the 5D section of this blog.

Still there is a law which is essential to all systems and was first formulated, partially in physics – the law of conservation of present energy, which consists of ‘closed time-space cycles’ with a repetitive frequency that maintains the Universe eternal.

And a metric equation, which defines for any isolated system of real it extending through 3 co-existing scales, its 5D structure:

The size in space and speed in time of the ∆-i parts and ∆+i wholes of a supœrganism is co-invariant: $e x ðƒ=K’

Those 2 expressions are the formal definitions of the three arrows of timespace and the three scales of physical systems, which apply to any system of the Universe, ad when properly plugged into classic physics will streamline and resolve most pending questions of the discipline.

These 2 laws proved experimentally ad nauseam and properly interpreted for the first time in theory, are THE laws we shall more often use to deduce the causal, temporal harmony of all beings of the universe.

If they will NOT EXIST, the Universe wouldn’t be a fractal that reproduces information but some weirdo thing, as humans believe to be (a big-bang singularity dying, the creation of a creeping bush in the Judean desert, you name it…)

RECAP:  2 KEY consequences of 11Ð=5г PHYSICS. Organic Properties and Generator equation. 

In the next graph we summarize the new properties derived from those complex qualities of fractal space and cyclical time and its ‘connected’ parts:

 The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration. Finally it requires a program of perception and survival, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world: 0 S x ∞ ð= @. Hence the creation of infinitesimal minds is the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative flows of entropy and information, ≤≥:

In the graphs, the absolute dimension of the scalar, fractal Universe, which constantly puts together parts into wholes, through social networks of reproduced information.

Below the relative 3 arrows of timespace that we find in each scale, studied by a different science.

Fractal space and cyclical time in physical systems imply an entangled Universe of multiple scales ruled in spacetime by 5D metric (Max. Size-lineal speed: $t = Min. Information: §ð). In space according to those metric equations, planes of lesser information move faster till the c-plane of pure space-time -our plane of perception, which for that reason is always still-constant in speed-distance for the electronic mind that gauges it. Yet we have above slower planes (thermodynamic) and below, faster, non perceived ones (non-local action at distance of forces between galaxies). In terms of or accelerated cyclical clocks that increase information as time passes, it defines 3 type of vortices of time, which is the meaning of physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its form and frequency: ∆+1 cosmological masses, ∆-1 quantum charges and in between in the ∆ø human plane, thermodynamic eddies. So the 3 different planes that create the human being, ∆±1 allow also the creation of geological and cosmological super organisms of physical matter.

Finally in terms of ‘topological Dimotions’ (dimensions of space with form and time motion), we observe the same 3 topological ‘varieties’ of space-time of biological organisms and mathematical systems, for each one of those planes, which conform simultaneous, ‘present’ physical organisms, with informative spherical particles-heads, hyperbolic, iterative body-waves and lineal or planar, moving potentials-‘limbs’, as those are the 3 topologies that store more information and close a memorial cycle in lesser space (O-particles), or connect two open points in minimal distance (|-limbs that perform $t lineal motions) or combine both, hence can reproduce information (hyperbolic waves).

Yet as physical systems do also perform ‘world cycles’ not only worldliness; they will also have always a seed-state of maximal metabolic speed as they are born (blue high frequency stars, hot diminutive black holes; hot planets and solar systems, irregular galaxies), which will ‘cool down’ and expand in scattering entropy till it die (tired redshift light, cooling planets and stars, gaseous entropic states that become cold solids, and NON-evaporating black holes – a clear ‘error’ never proved which breaks the laws of thermodynamics, as hot black holes accrete matter after birth, cooling down; but which Mr. Hawking charm and provocateur spirit has canonized for tool long). Thus this brief introduction to the new outlook of physics in 5D shows how with the same data of classic physics, we will describe quite a different Universe in its philosophy and form.

The first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, is a better expression of the fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of energy

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

Which in a more complex version writes:

Γœ: ∆-1 ≤≥$pe (past-lineal fields/limbs) ≤≥ ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) ≤≥ Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particles-heads)>∆+1

The symbols of that equation belong to non-aristotelian logic, based in three arrows of timespace that come together to create the being. And as we will constantly repeat them, and use them to write equations that describe systems in time, space and scale, we might as well explain them in this tiny nutshell foreword:

SCALES: ∆ is the symbol of the fifth dimension of scales. So a system extends through three such scales, ∆-1, the atomic/cellular scale, ∆º, the organic, thermodynamic scale and ∆+1 the world where the system exists or gravitational, ecosystemic scale.

TOPOLOGIES:

S ($, Spe) means entropic space; St, Ø, E iterative energy; T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. 

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Yet as physics is ‘by decree’ a stience which only uses mathematics as its language of expression, the main revolution of ∆ST will likely collide with the usual suspects – dogma against organic truths, except in egocentered humans.

A second revolution, regarding physics – its upgrading of the formalism of mathematical physics, by decoding the ‘experimental nature’ of its equations, however might be of more interest to them. In that regard, the immediate conclusion of that experimental nature is the coupling of disciplines of mathematics with those of ∆ST:

-The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

-Topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time.

We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the THREE AGES of time…

The question of Kaleidoscopic Jargons: pedantic details, simple, ultimate principles.

IT has then to be understood in pure philosophical terms the HUGE difference between what science is TODAY AND WHAT it is really when we complete its arrows of time adding information to the mix as an arrow of time-future MORE important than mere locomotion, as people seem to just with an astouding simplicity and arrogance to discharge any temporal whys that cannot be measure as motion in space.

When you ad information though YOU AD LANGUAGES, form, stillness, perception, singularities, intelligence, organicism, ALL THE ELEMENTS THEY DISCHARGE as they are not susceptible to locomotion, distance and measure as they happen inwards, in a point through formal evolution.

The maxwellian demons ORDER reality, minds and languages DO EXIST, territorial order is the essence of existence and nothing can be solved beyond what we already know and the gathering of data and establishment of causal systems merely on statistic grounds if we do NOT acknowledge that human properties are common to all singularity systems that control a territorial organism they order. In the next graph we show that difference of point of views:

HUMINDscales

IN THE GRAPH, we see the essential difference when we add information: the mind-singularities that order reality around their center BECOME the ultimate why of all realities. Creation by replication, iteration, mirror image, reproduction of information become the meaning of it all. And so vital properties become embedded.

Now before we even talk of physics, we will NOT talk in the language of physics. So maybe you just ‘have enough’ with this comment to abandon the blog…

If not we shall respect obviously and enlighten an enormous number of physical laws; but we shall NOT talk in this ‘first simpler line’ on the language of physics, because nobody can apply the language of physics to other science, and moreover physicists DO NOT understand their language, though only the greatest ones, from Newman to Feynman can affirm merrily ‘we don’t understand mathematics, we get accustomed to it’, ‘the whys is the only thing physicists don’t ask’, ‘Nobody understands quantum physics’ (: So we shall use the language of 5D, which applies to all sciences.

This said, what is physics about? Initially about mathematical languages observing physical systems, but in depth it is the same language of 5D²; the language of symmetries of space-time; only that it is not streamlined and simplified and properly written with the whole number of dimensions of reality, but talks of the very same dimensions with different names, and does NEITHER has the proper understanding of the mind-reality, space-time, form-motion dualities. So this is what will allow us to translate the language of symmetry of physics TO A JARGON even a child school will understand in a few decades.

An example will suffice:  The electron’s  properties Are all intimately connected to profound symmetries of physical laws. Mass – a real-valued parameter, and spin, a discrete one, uniquely classify all possible realizations of special relativity by particles. (For experts: mass and spin occur as the Casimir operators for the inhomogeneous Lorentz group.) Electric charge, a conserved quantity, classifies realizations of the gauge symmetry of electromagnetism. Once you specify how the practical electron responds to those symmetry transformations, you have determined its physical behavior. In that sharp and concrete sense, the electron is an embodiment of symmetry: Its physical properties inhere in its mathematical form.

This is the language of physics, not mention of the word space and time, though symmetry is all over the world. Because mass, spin, potential, field, relativity (the Lorentz group) and electromagnetism are NOT defined as such. So nobody even physicists understand ‘why’.

In the language of 5D² symmetries however we shall just say that electrons are in the fractal Universe of similar atoms≈galaxies, the ‘membrane’, enclosure or Halo of the system, and the measure of its enclosure is called in the galaxy, ‘mass’ in the electron ‘spin’, but the ‘humind’ which is an electromagnetic mind that ‘gauges’ those upper and lower scales of the Universe, distorts those measures according to the 5D metric equations accelerating the time of electrons and decelerating those of galaxies, so we need a ‘rule of measure’ to adapt those two scales called the Lorentz Group… And then we say that if we consider the electron only its ‘present vital energy’ in its plane of existence, ∆-3, is its electric charge, reason why it is a conserved, a 3D ∑∏ dimension for the electron, which is a ‘density of charge’ made of ‘ultra-dense’ particle-states of light, aka photons, the ‘cellular element’ of those electrons, its ‘4D-entropic dimension’ of parts, whereas the electron’s whole is its 5Dimension or atom…

And so to conclude, paraphrasing the physicists’ narrative: In that sharp and concrete sense, the electron is an embodiment of 5D² symmetry: Its physical properties inhere in its spacetime Dimensions of form & Motion.

And so the word mathematical is not needed to know the ‘ultimate whys’, the thoughts of god, though of course, the details do have an specific language, as man has words to express its details, emotions and actions – electrons have geometry of space and social numbers in time to map mentally those vital actions, as an organism of dense light, expressed in the next graph, not with hamiltonians but in the vital, organic language of 5D:

SO we shall be able to consider through the actions of the beings, which are all similar in search of survival, the existence of singularity-minds in all of them.

In the graph, in quantum physics the unit of information is h/2, which measures the minimal time for an ‘action’ and the minimal ‘angular momentum’ that is essentially the cyclical motion of the quantum physic system as it returns to its position. It is also the abstract concept of the uncertainty principle that now becomes ‘real’.

Not only a quantum action requires that minimal time for each basic action that ‘reproduces’ a cycle, but when we perceive and measure one of those cycle, we also require the minimal quantum unit of information, which becomes therefore the degree of uncertainty in our measure of the energy-body and particle cycle of time-information. Hence E x T = h/2 is the uncertainty of measure, the quantum minimal clock of thought/information processing, and in the action of reproduction, the minimal quantity to ‘reproduce’ a virtual particle, a ‘first step in the adjacent’ reproduction-locomotion of the being

Clarifications on conservation quantities, states and magnitudes.

The previous example shows the problems of translating all those terminologies to T.Œ are due to the use of very different jargons and parameters for each scale. We have introduced the simplest translations of the ∆-1 into the ∆+1 scales in the previous post (Unification equation of charges and masses). Yet it will be easier to use in this introductory level the common jargons of those sciences, merely identifying the previous space, time 5D symmetries and its constant of actions and 5 space-time cycles for each species of each scale.

Needless to say within the previous isomorphisms, we can fit all the disciplines of physical sciences; whose exhaustive analysis of all the actions, species, space-time symmetries (equations) and events in time, between the n-1 scale (quantum physics, electrodynamics, magnetism) and the n-scale (thermodynamics, state physics, electricity) makes physics & chemistry, when NOT trying to make metaphysics (cosmological, eschatological and philosophical statements), the most thoroughly investigated science today.

We will follow the isomorphic method, studying those 2 scales not with the usual procedure of physical and chemical sciences, which define the events of those actions and its structure in space and time with mathematical equations, but with the procedure of T.Œ, considering the 1) 5D scales, 2) space and 3) time symmetries first, its elements and finally its 4)  actions, introducing within that scheme the definitions of the parameters, constants, magnitudes, dimensions and equations of mathematical physics.

Now, unlike more evident ‘scales’ in which form dominates motion (Evolution) or thought (memes) dominates from and motion (sociology), closer to the human experience, the world of physical systems, is the most remote to that experience, and its language (mathematics) the less known to humans, which move on the natural languages of human thought (visual art, verbal time, emotional bondages), and understand as animals, the survival, topological forms of life. For that reason we would need a basic introduction to the interplay of this wider reality expressed in abstract terminologies that seem so remote from the bio-sociological experience.

They are not. As all beings are knots of space-time cyclical actions, whose purpose is survival. The program of the Universe is hidden on physical systems by the remoteness of its scales, the abstraction of its description and the immensity of its elements. So we shall do an introduction to the interplay and co-existence of the 3 scales of reality, the electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic and the gravitational scale. We exclude though the limits beyond those scales, the quarks inside the atoms and the galaxy beyond the planet, because they do not truly interact in this world of human existence.

The 5th dimension has barriers between planes of existence, where energy and information don’t cross, due to entropy and asymmetry (chirality); and essentially our world is one of light, electrons, atoms, molecules and matter states.

The similarities between the internal ‘strong forces’ of the atom and the internal gravitational forces of the galaxy, the external electromagnetic forces of the atom, and the external dark energy of the cosmos are studied also with physical laws, but will not be included here.

A question also of difficult analysis is the 3 units of action, of those 3 scales, the angular momentum of h-Planck actions, the vibrational temperature of thermodynamics, and the variable g-forces of gravitation. Those constant of actions seem truly different in its form and equations but  the concept of integrative ‘energy’, will allow us to explain how energy and information transfers among those planes.

Finally the order of exposition will be a diachronic analysis, which works better, as the human mind seems to be structure in this manner. So I have abandoned my personal files, which are always written with an analogical, metaphoric method jumping synchronically between all systems of all scales, in spatial order.

Thus we shall analyze in the order in which humans discovered those scales, starting from the science of Mechanics, or higher gravitational scale (XVII and XVIII c.) then the science of Thermodynamics, or human scale (XVIII-XIX c.) and finally the science of electromagnetism and its minimal units (quantum scale).

We will in each scale introduce the spatial and temporal order of the 3 time-space elements of the generator equation (Se<ST>Tƒ), intersecting laws and cases of classic physics, but given the difficulty to understand directly those elements (unlike in biological and sociological forms), introduce a somewhat intermediate exposition but directly ‘downloading’ and interpreting  the known-known laws of those systems. Hence the sub-posts entitled ‘mechanics’, ‘Newtonian laws, ‘Maxwell equations’,  ‘quantum numbers’, ‘Conservation Laws’ etc. In an ideal world in which T.Œ is the Unification theory of all sciences, those terms would not be used, but at this stage we must translate those well-known laws to the elements of T.Œ.

Now all this SIMPLE REALITY is GREATLY complicated in physics by the multiple jargons, lack of TOE, denial of non quantitative properties and multiplicity of mathematical formalisms for all of those elements of T.Œ, for example, the concept of mass, which we simply as gravitational vortices, has the formalism of Higgs, particle with its negative masses, ad hoc additions, but essentially right; as it is a top quark (in the similar Technicolor more correct formulation) field of dark energy and faster than c-rotational speed, beyond the even horizon of the accelerated black hole vortices.

There is however an even more interesting formulation that general relativity, the Higgs field and Technicolor, which is the dick-brane theory of a variable G-constant, which can be used to define the different scalar vortices of the different planes of physical systems (charges, atomic molecules, gravitational light-space confined to galaxies and c-speed and outer dark energy cosmological structures).

Time permitted we shall then choose a formalism that better adapts to 5D planes for all its physical scales in the 4th line. Here we just mention the extraordinary difficulties to fully integrate all those different jargons, and the different formalisms within each scalar jargon and the astounding number of details studied by physicists.

So now let us continue with this post, an the minimal clarifications, on physical concepts, magnitudes and constants to be able to carry a meaningful analysis of the 3 spatial, temporal, 5 D symmetries and Œ-points of those fundamental 3+1 scales, which affect life on this planet (the rest being cosmological analysis in the previous posts).

Now those are the ‘practical’ constants to develop physics as it is; no homogenized by T.Œ formalism. So we must do a few important clarifications. Any system can be well defined, considering its 5D planes and its space and time symmetries and space-time actions, which range from the minimal unit of its simpler ∆a actions, to the larger, longer ∆u social actions.

Yet the lack of a proper definition of:

  • Tƒ: Cyclical time in physics (measured sometimes with frequency – light scale; with lineal time; mechanic scale; with temperature, molecular scale; and so on)…
  • Sp: Vital space, measured sometimes with: wavelength – light scale; with flux current, electric scale; with entropy, molecular scale; with length, mechanic scale.
  • ST: Present, body-wave, measured sometimes with Energy, sometimes with Momentum, sometimes with Intensity, and so on..

Requires a one-to-one analysis of each scale and species.

Further on the Human scale or thermodynamic scale is the one according to epistemology, with less uncertainty of data. It means in practical terms that we do have a ternary fractal subdivision in great detail of our scale in 3 sub-scales:

  • The electric scale with the electron and its social, ∑e=I, currents of electricity, ruled by photonic bondage.
  • The atomic scale with the atom and its social ∑a=molecular structures, ruled by electronic bondage
  • The Matter scale with its molecules and its temporal states, ruled by temperature gradients.

So we are in fact talking of 2+1 (x3) relative scales, to study in great detail. So many elements, so many ill-defined concepts, and yet surprisingly enough, so well-done ‘how-mathematical descriptions’ of its ∆a, motion actions…

All in all  the main equations of the 3 scales, define its energy, its constant of action and its acceleration. What those terms mean? And how they transfer into those 3 scales?

Let us consider it from a different perspective. There are 3 magnitudes to define all mechanical actions:

Tƒ: ‘mass’, the active magnitude, similar to charge, the active magnitude of the ∆ scale, similar to h, the active magnitude of the n-1 scale.

Se: Time, defined by frequency in ∆-1, by the electromagnetic field in n and by the acceleration in the ∆+1

And ST, defined by Energy in n-1 and by force in n and ∆+1.

And it is this ST factor what transfers between scales.

350px-Spin-physics-w.svg

In the graph, particles with the appropriate ‘inverse spin’, will ‘reproduce’ new particles. This obvious organic formal motion, however is not understood in organic terms by the abstract interpretation of mathematical physics. Hence the importance to upgrade mathematics to the Non-Euclidean, fractal paradigm, as we do in T.Œ by re-defining all its postulates in realist terms, and studying all its theorems and its 3 sub-disciplines, which perfectly match the laws of T.Œ.:

5 Dimensional analysis, with its study of how ‘finitesimal particles’ emerge as wholes in space and time, through quanta sums and derivations; and its variational calculus and Laws of least action in time-space that define the 3 maximal, minimal and staring points or 3 ages/states of systems (Lagrangians, Hamiltonians, etc.)

Geometry and topology and fractal space, which study the structure of points into lines, networks and surfaces that move and adapt to the environment the system.

Algebra, which properly upgraded into Non-Aristotelian algebra of 3 relative time dimensions will truly show all the power of mathematics to express the symmetries that generate all the varieties of beings of the Universe.

So now, for each point of physical systems, galaxy, black hole, star, particle or atom, we do define always 3 relative dimensions of space-time, which correspond to its 3 Sæ < ST ≥To functions as in any system of the Universe.

The particle might and will certainly have a field and a wave behind it, it will be a mixture of ternary topologies. But this is essential to understand what is observable and what is not, almost all THE OPENINGS OF A SYSTEM ARE ALWAYS WITHIN THE Tœ point that controls the system. All your apertures, excel the excretory ones of the body are within your mind-head, and in the case of atoms, the fundamental apertures are its spin positions:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.47.05

In the graph, the minimal unit of ‘bidimensional space-information’ in physical systems is a spin, the ‘eyes’ of atomic systems, which organise quantum actions into larger wholes.

Now, once we understand the ‘fractal point’, we can study its apertures, which will be 3 relative perpendicular axis, for absorption and emission of entropy-motion and in/form/ation, ±∆e, i along its natural axis of motion, ∆æ, information, ∆ï and feeding on energy. Physical systems show this behaviour through the complex laws of quantum physics, where the spin is the fundamental parameter to absorb and emit information, while the plane on the equator-belt of the system is the fundamental region of absorption and emission of energy and radiation.

The gradient of acceleration of the field will be the absorption gradient and cause of the attraction of the system, which finds a balance between gravitation and radiation, absorption and emission of formal motions, at every stage of reality. Reproductive systems are more complex as we have seen, often modulated by the spin of the system. Ultimately being the Universe a game of formal motions the mere extension of a motion means a reproductive action.

Then transfers of energy and information from those apertures in the most general case (Non-AE mathematics) structure all systems, of which stars and galaxies will just be a larger one.

So we can conclude this description of it with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that particles obey in terms of the actions of space-time they display to ‘exist’: Screen Shot 2016-04-03 at 20.31.17

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze asses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masse, û, than from individuals and the LAWS OF SUPERORGANISMS, studied in the first line – the common game that makes emerge through 4th postulate of ¬æ networks a whole, indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.
The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species.

The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E rules 

The 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man to the entangled Universe; expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing its chaos, with a better understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging – themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts).
So, we MUST ad those NEW elements or Ðisomorphisms to the scientific method and as usual, given the growth of complexity required, we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to this expansion of the logic of reality, called Existential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method (ab. ¬Æ).
The enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method ad the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms) and the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE, ¡logic structure that comes out of the multiple nature of time-space Ðimotions to the classic elements of epistemology:
 A-ristotelian logic, D-ata, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.
Contrary to belief, it is not part of the scientific method the use of mathematical languages, as the only language of science that the method truly acknowledges is logic, from where modern logicians have deduced or disproved all the statements of mathematics – the belief that maths is the language of God is just an ego paradox of physicists.
Of course we do acknowledge as the best language of science, logic, albeit of a higher quality than present @ristotelian logic (¬A logic) and we ad topology as the best language to express the dimensional motions of space-time, albeit of a higher order than Euclidean mathematics, and the reduced non-euclidean mathematics of present huminds, which only changed the fifth postulate (we shall change all the axioms and congruence postulates converting geometry truly in a non-Euclidean system).
So we shall also include in this ‘brief ¬æ method the laws of what we consider a more proper logic and mathematical system to mirror with a better focus the properties of reality.
So to ‘the classic elements of epistemology’:
Aristotelian logic consistence’, which still works for @-mind analysis…
– accurate realist Data so often forgotten in social sciences and creationist mathematics…
Correspondence principle and Cyclical predictability, which is the origin of classic scientific laws, now fully explained by the cyclical nature of time…
-the Experimental method with its proved ‘Economicity’ (the universe is simple and economic, using only those elements we know to be real, often called Ockham’s razor) the ad ons caused by cyclical time and fractal topological space, are in the non-Æ scientific method:
Non-Aristotelian, cyclical pentalogic caused by the cyclical nature of time and its 5 motions.
Non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, caused by the topological scalar nature of space, where each point ‘holds a world in itself’.
Biological, organic properties and models, caused by the scalar co-existing structure of fractal space.
–  Disomorphisms, caused by the homologic nature of all beings made of space and time, wraped up in the Disomorphic temporal method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or in its spatial, SYNCHRONOUS version – through the analysis of the system AND its 5 entangled DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTIONs-ELEMENTS, we call the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.
All this, ¬A logic, @ristotelian minds, Biological properties, Correspondence, Cyclical laws, Data and Disomorphic method, Economicity, Experimental method,  ¬E mathematics, fits between ¬A@,bccdd, ee and ¬E.
So that is we constantly abbreviate the rules of truth in the ® logo.
Of course classic Epistemology ads a few other rules, the Ockham rule which is embedded in the concept of economicity, more precise in its terminology, the predictability of any scientific model that must predict the future and allow further hypothesis to be proved, which is embedded in the cyclical nature of time that therefore must predict future events if the cycles are properly described.
And the fashionista rule of Popper’s verifiability, which is embedded in the experimental method – all experiences and data must fit on the model, but for those pedantic scholars so in loved of the obvious explained with weird terminology we might call it ¬exceptionalism… that is not a single exception to the model.
And so we can include it as the 11th rule of the ® method.
I am inclined to do so and make an exception to my rule of autism – that is, to be inconsiderate with the egocy (ego+idiocy) of most academia, recognizing this to be a fault of my own ego. We must indeed correspond with the serious truths of the subconscious collective mind of mankind in search of reality and reason.
So yes! we all know Popper’s musings that the black Swan breaks the rule that all swans are white and proves it false; and accept it. In fact non-exceptionalism is THE TRUE, LAST AND FUNDAMENTAL RULE I have used all my life TO PROVE ¬Æ right. It has guided 30 years autism and lonely enjoyment of the Tao… as I have never found an exception, Law, event and form in Nature and Man, in mind and matter, which I could not explain with the GST model. 
Plus this gives us 11 rules, the magic number that transcends and emerges from the infinitesimal 1 to the relative infinite ∆+1.
11 rules establish thus the new non-Æ method of stience: ¬A@,bccdd, ee, ¬e ¬E ≈ ¡logic method, the next vowel after the non-a and non-e.
And its purpose is to describe any event or system in its most ¡logic stringent form… and break the simplistic ae-logic of huminds who believe a truth is so reduced as simple as its ceteris paribus single analysis of reality. So in terms of truth, we can say that a truth to be real needs multiple perspectives, which is the Rashomon effect:
MAX. TRUTH= MAX. POINTS OF VIEW AND LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVENT-BEING.
The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions AND THE shallow evidence of a single continuous spacetime.
So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time. And correct the errors of the @mind, and on top deny all this at the point of entropic death when the being ceases to exist.
If all this was acknowledge, then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause. On the contrary they would greet each other for finding another of the 11 elements and 5 perspectives trying to accomodate them all, relishing on their paradoxes.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the entangled Universe and the World with which you are connected.
So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-present-future world cycle or block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily ‘free’ life, the constrains imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Constrains of which physicists are truly aware when finding solutions to its equations, are the key to the determinism of reality, coming from the larger and smaller planes of the T.œ being.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally in the most abstract level of modeling – that of the Ðisomorphisms of any T.Œ , or theoretical extraction of general laws common to all spacetime events/beings, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – we shall find examples always from the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and socio-economic systems, which is how we will include the non-exception rule. In fact this reduces to two kind of systems as we are talking in a language, so the discourse of the text is the example that the language also mirrors the property. And as we include social systems into biology, we often escape them, except when studying specific social systems. For example its 3 classes, the informative people-caste on top on command of the languages of power, its working, reproductive body-class and its limbic, entropic territory or enemy, poor, unemployed class, are mimetic to the 3 elements of an system, made of limbs/potentials of entropy that have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, reproductive body waves and informative particle/heads.
So yes, human systems are homologic to biologic and social and mental languages all also with ternary syntax in their Universal grammar. But for sake of brevity and to avoid rising eyebrows of egocy when comparing humans and its societies with atoms and beasts, the non-exception rule is shortened.
Still we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but at least in physical and biological systems.  So in the previous example of limbs and its topology, we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic airplanes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ¬ABCD¬E mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds us.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we will try to write the main laws of all stiences with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.

We shall call therefore the study of the ternary laws that ensure the existences of all beings, ¬existential logic or i-logic, as it comes after a and e and it is a key symbol of GST.

Thus Existential Logic, ab. ®, deals with the rules of ternary logic that define the existence and extinction of beings and the algebraic equations derived of the fractal generator that define the possible events and species of reality and those who break the laws of existential algebra and cannot therefore be possible.

In terms of language it means as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite. 
So that is the future of stience, in any planet in which similar huminds have kept expanding our connection with the entangled Universe.
In this first line though we just consider a brief introduction to the more complex formal elements of the model, which will grow in intensity and complexity through the lines of the web. So we shall introduce at the end the highest level of ‘science’, the i-logic equations of 5D metric generators.
We must stress though that this first line has its emphasis in ‘qualitative, verbal understanding’, the second line in main details/sciences, the 3rd is about those Disomorphisms and the fourth the full blown model – and that this will always be a work in progress, for a future encyclopedia of stiences and the writer has a ‘parallel brain’, not a lineal Aristotelian one, a bit disordered. So apologies for style, repetitions and bad English.

 

Logic and experimental proofs of ¬æxistential logic.

The proof of the existence of a ternary logic depends on the infinity of the Universe, which is in itself a property derived of the nature of fractals, which can be divided ad nauseam, that is, of ∞ scales of the fifth dimension.

(I am not though using formal logic, pedantic forms of expression to prove but classic logic, the logic embedded in the verbal syntax of reason, which is FAR MORE POWERFUL FOR MAN THAN ANY pedantic version ‘imagined by Hilbert like individuals who pretend to substitute the logic of the whole human species)

Indeed, the ONE DOES NOT EXIST PERSE IN TERNARY LOGIC, because if the one exists per se in a dynamic universe, of finite parts, its existence will be limited to the space-time occupied by the one, which is an infinitesimal compared to the infinite duration of the Universe in time, and its infinite extension in relative size in any scale. We just need to realise that a larger scale will be so vastly large in its ‘point-sizes’ compared to the infinitesimal, that the o-will not exist.

So it is necessary to extend backwards and forwards in time, in space and in scales reality. And as systems are dynamic, that motion upwards and backwards can only be real if it is ternary.

On the other hand by negatio ad absurdum it becomes obvious that if you do not reproduce your information in a new son-region of space, as you move through time-translate through space, you will cease to exist, and as 1/∞, on the wholeness, which is the ONLY TOTAL EXISTENCE we can assess of, you are an infinitesimal zero.

It is then a philosophical question for advanced GST theory to assess if there is anything that exist at all.

i.e. in Mathematics, we know the number of rational numbers compared to those irrational are a zero-sum, finite vs. infinite.

In the graph, the ternary principle in physical and biological systems.

This is experimentally evident. So the second ‘proof’ which must be besides ‘theory’, ‘experience’, shows you that if you want to exist you have to reproduce in three discontinuous generational cycles. You exist because a father conceived you and you will keep existing because your son reproduces your genes, and generally speaking the three generations co-exist together.

This is also the rule in space: you exist because you have three topological parts, body, head and limbs. Physical systems also coexist in ‘three wave-packets’ and three parts (complementarity principle, particle-weave-field: pilot interpretation of quantum physics). So the ternary logic makes possible existence.

In the graph, we see ternary logic in quantum physics, the system is ‘both’ (i have no found a good adjective for 3, so we settle for 2 showing indeed human logic faulty with wording) field, particle and wave. And it goes through three generations in any possible event (the graph shows the transformation from a moving wave into a stop-particle.

The examples of ternary logic would be infinite.

All systems thus can be described by a single generator equation of its three symmetries of scalar ðime§pace:

Γ.           ∆-1 Spe: Space-entropy-Past-motion ≤ ∆ ST: Present, Momentum=∂ Energy ≥ ∆+1 Tƒi: Form-Mind.

Now ternary logic implies the existence of simultaneity in space to MAKE ALL MEASURES OF EXISTENCE – THE KEY ADVANCE OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY; and it implies the coexistence of three scales in ∆, which we have already shown all over the blog. So it is needed to introduce the third element, the co-existence in time of three sequential states of the being, which then becomes warped up by the 11th, whole dimension, giving us the 11D structure of all beings.

 The realists of space-time: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks,  of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.

Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Timespace theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.

If timespace cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

How can then prove the relational theory of time-space?

Simply; By showing that all what exist can be explained as a system of 5 Dimensions of space and 5 symmetric dimensions of time, whose properties we shall call ‘isomorphisms’ or Dimensional isomorphisms (ab. 10 Ði) define the nature of all beings of the Universe.

We will do so though acknowledging the Correspondence principle – that is respecting all the findings of previous science, just expanding his views. So we must start indeed with the beginning of modern science, the understanding of the relativity between motion and form.

Heaviside, as Lobachevski before him and Einstein after him, were right when they considered that the language of physics – mathematics – is the best experimental mind-mirror to describe most physical systems, NOT an a priori magic ‘language that suffices in itself’ and codes the Universe before it existed. So first we need to clarify the difference between creationist and experimental mathematics as a philosophy of science that describes the Universe.

Difference between Philosophy of science and Physicist’s worldview.

So to end this post, a small analysis of the HUGE gap between the work of a philosopher of science and that of physicists in the understanding of the Universe, as a game of singularities and its mirror languages, WHICH IS far more profound in the philosopher of science than the physicist because:

1) we both now the same maths (yes I know all their maths, perhaps not with the same absolute detail of Mr. Penrose but good enough to admire deeply the real masters and spot the faked ones – De Broglie NOT Bohr, Lindau NOT Hawking and so on… though of course I bitch about it)

2)But physicists after laughing at all ‘verbal thinkers’ from Aristotle to Darwin have no fuking idea what they talk about when they talk about TIME=MOTION=CHANGE MODES (of which there are 5-> ergo 5 dimensions), SPACE=motion stopped into simultaneous form by a mind (of which there are therefore also 5 Dimensions parallel to those of time) etc. etc. So all what they can do IS MAKE  machines then make MEASURES OF SPACE and time, PUT IT INTO EQUATIONS AND THEN talk with peanut brains bull$hit in verbal concept thought WHICH IS HOW HUMANS perceive the feeling of knowledge (cogito ergo sum, not vidi ergo sum). And there is where they mess because. THEN THEY CANNOT INTERPRET WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPTS THEIR EQUATIONS RIGHT.

If you have the concepts right the EQUATIONS REACH A NEW HEIGHT OF ‘PERCEPTION OF REALITY’.

Consider for example the trivial solution to the longest dispute of physicists between Bohr – the Universe is probabilistic and Einstein – the Universe is statistical. IT is a false argument, because in the ∆-3 quantum scale it is better described in probabilities of time and in the ∆-2 thermodynamic scale is best put in spatial terminology; because time is motion and quantum scales in 5D (s xt = k) is faster, than the larger slower, thermodynamic scale, which is better described with the equivalent spatial description:

So there IS no DISPUTE between Einstein and Bohr, the Universe is not EITHER probabilistic in time (the 0-1 mathematical unit sphere after normalization of parameters) OR STATISTICAL IN SPACE (the 1-∞ thermodynamic plane). BOTH ARE EQUIVALENT MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONS (measure theory), the 1-∞ plane is better for slower LARGE thermodynamic ensembles that occupy more space. THE time o-1 description IS BETTER FOR faster ‘clocks of smaller particles’.

Since smaller time clocks close its cycles faster, HENCE their speed of time-processing of information is FASTER, reason why paradoxically our genes code our larger bodies, our memes code the planet earth, and quantum numbers code larger ensembles: SMALL IS CLEVERER…

5D scalar metric: smaller scales in space run faster time clocks, so both together S-izes x T(clocks) = Constant, are co-invariant: definition of a dimension of space-time, as per Klein’s XIX c. mathematician: ‘a dimension of space-time exists, when there is a mathematical metric equation that shows both parameters co-invariant, so we can move through them…

so we move through the 5th dimension of pace-time of scales, GROWING IN SIZE AND DIMINISHING YOUR TIME CLOCKS, FROM BIRTH, AS A FAST SEED OF time, small in space, that slow downs its rhythms as it grows in size and emerges in this scale you call 4D space-time continuum… LIFE IS A TRAVEL through those SCALES of the fifth dimension… AND THAT IS THE MEANING OF ‘EXISTENCE AS A SPACE-TIME ORGANISM’, the ULTIMATE QUESTION to know…

i know thoughts of GodTHE REST ARE DETAILS.

Each of those details is then exactly the type of symmetry we used to explain the o-1 quantum sphere, MIRROR-MIND of the larger thermodynamic ensemble. Each still language perceives in itself ‘knows’ its codes, its images, and then projects it into the reality around. The DNA IS being in space. As your mind IS by virtue of the focus of its still image, an IMAGE IS PERCEPTION IN ITSELF, FOR EACH QUANTUM moment OF STOPPING PERCEPTION, then it IS WILL as it projects that stopped perception in a reversed symmetry in the local territory it orders.

 The philosopher knows, the physicist sees.

So I could talk for ages of all those details, and solve all human questions to the extend human languages ‘perceive’ reality to question it…  but OBVIOUSLY  the would NOT be relevant to a physicist that CANNOT UNDERSTAND any property which is NOT mathematical…  given the limit of their VERBAL CONCEPTUAL BRAIN, highly ATROPHIED…

So yes mathematics IS  GREAT, if you understand MORE LANGUAGES TO FILL IT WITH CONCEPTS.

BUT it is NOT the only mirror-language. The languages of god are infinite, and all of them reflects in its still linguistic image-mind, in each god-singularity that speaks its mirror image that perceives the Universe:

O-singularity (still mind) x ∞ time cycles of the Universe = constant world.

It is that local constant world what then the singularity mirrors in reverse order in the territorial region it orders:

ie. Infinite systems=monads are constantly STOPPING motions of time into mental SPATIal forms, and then ordering the World around them PROJECTING BACK THAT IMAGE-mirror, in inverse symmetry, as you do WITH YOUR PROPERTY, man with GAIA -FUKING IT UP, the black hole with ITS GRAVITATIONAL WAVES the galaxy the DNA with ITS RNA ORDERS, inverse images of its crystalized genes. etc. etc.

Atoms though are QUANTUM GEOMETRIES and so TOPOLOGY not ‘math’ DOES have a HUGE number of territories to order, specially in the lower ‘scales’ of reality. But not only math orders.

I.E. Ants order with pheromones its paths, women with the projection of its mind emotions their families, and above all languages, LOGIC not maths ORDERS and it is of a ‘higher order than human logic’ (Saint Agustine), which is ONE-DIMENSIONAL, LINEAL, ARISTOTELIAN while the Universe has a 5th dimensional Logic, way up to the limits of axiomatic methods, of which we give some hints on the articles on non-Æ.

Now the problem with human physicists (not physics) is NOT that they don’t understand more than one language to be able to harmonize and mirror each language image into the other reaching the RASHOMON MULTIPLE VIEW-TRUTH of its sciences, according to the equation of truth in epistemology:

Max. Number of images-languages cast upon a being = Max. truth…

The problem is THEY ARE TOO ARROGANT to even realize they don’t UNDERSTAND and too prudish to go back to school.

The ego is too huge to recognize they ‘only know they know nothing’. Me, the philosopher of science? Just put enough conceptual verbal logic thought and visual ‘saper vedere intuition’ to their mix…

But as you are in the visual, Facebook age unfortunately this upgrade of humind knowledge is going to be a singularity… nobody cares for the blog, that I know.
But ROBOTS WILL neither. They will HAVE A VISUAL INTELLIGENCE, THEY WILL THINK ‘CREATING MOVIES’ they won’t talk. THEY WILL IMAGINE EVILWOOD GORE MOVIES AS MILITARY ROBOTS, the first to be born, already chase faster the red color, visual minds use to ‘code’ the function of entropy, to kill… they will be natural born eye-killers and chase down humans as targets of video-games call of duty fans a la Adam Lanza,… 
 
Verbal, cogito ergo sum thought peaks and dies it seems on those pages… 😷
But I did have a degree of communion with the entangled Universe that sufficed in itself. Because that is THE ULTIMATE MEANING OF KNOWLEDGE, WHICH IS NOT EXTERNAL TO THE MIND, NOT A PICTURE BUT A ‘THOUGHT’, SO THE TRUE SAGES do NOT need huge technological machines to know but huge IQs in multiple languages to SEE WITHIN the harmonies and symmetries of the Universe – from Aristotle through Leonardo through Einstein through…
WE KNOW WHEN WE KNOW BECAUSE IT IS WITHIN OUR PERCEPTION OF ENTANGLEMENT-HARMONY-NIRVANA between our language mirrors and the Universe… that is ALSO THE BEAUTY OF MATH, properly understood THE MOST perfect but not the only MIRROR…

For me all this said, the biggest intellectual orgasm of my mind mirror focused in the physical Universe has been to marry mathematical physics with the fractal, organic properties of the Universe. It has been a 30 years journey of a ginormous number of notebooks and margin writing, on the path long ago opened and never fully understood method of ‘saper vedere’ of my confessed master in my intellectual trajectory, Mr. Leonardo; a man of similar background (born in Firenze as I was in Barcelona, both knots of communication of the western, coastal culture which from Syracuse to Gades, has always developed an organic, artistic, human sensorial but also mathematical, mechanical view of the Universe; in 3 horizons, Greece, I horizon, Italy II horizon and Spain III Horizon…. the fact that he was first as I was a painter/artist, curiously born of a Notary, traveler of the world, jack-of-all trades to make a living writing on the spare time his notebooks are other curious affinities, though I recognize him as a man of superior value – no humble bullshit here, certainly a better artist, and we deal with those themes of huminds as knots of thought of their cultures on other places.

What matters now is to understand that the mechanical method of science of Mr, Galileo was a simplex slavery of the mind of man to the mechanical clock, when there are infinite beautiful clocks in the Universe, or quoting another huge influence of my philosophy of science, taoism.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

The Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension).

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

Names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either combine  into reproductive green or its anti-complementary sterile yellow, the colour of eviL=anti-live destruction, of hypnotic gold-money (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see, even in the game of History.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the ‘Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

The generator is thus the simplest formula, which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

Spheres that hold the maximal volume of information in particle-heads; flat, lineal topologies – the fastest distance in moving potentials/limbs – and hyperbolic, iterative body waves that generate all the forms, are the 3 only topologies of the Universe, which ensemble to form the ‘present-spatial super organisms’ we see in each ∆-scale of reality:

The 3 elements of all systems, lineal/flat limbs/potentials; spherical, tall heads/particles and its hard membranes of dark matter, trunks and skins accomplish the 3 functions of motion, energetic reproduction and informative perception in all systems, varying to adapt the system to its larger world.

So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

|-moving limbs/potentials  x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.

Or we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

Rashomon Truths explain the 5 Dimotions of any spacetime organism/event by considering the spatial= informative and temporal= moving sides of reality putting those 4 parameters together through a(nti)symmetric ≤≥ flows of communication: ∆t≥S@.                                              We study in space all systems as simultaneous co-existing super organisms with 3 topologies, 3 scales of existence and 3 relative time-ages, all of them perceived by a singularity that exchanges actions of energy and information with the entities of its world on different planes.
The 5th dimotions study of the fractal generator in space thus gives us a full account of any supeorganism in exist¡ence, as an ensemble of ∆-1 energy points of a limbic system that moves an ∆º super organism, co-existin in an ∆+1 world, made of 3 topological O x | = Ø structures. The Rashomon method of truth then extracts from the generator equation, different sub-equations to analyze in more detail the parts of the being.
In space thus we use the ‘generator equation’ and 5D Rashomon truths to convey a full sense of the being.

Let us then consider briefly the symbols for the Generator Equation of t.œs and its 5 Dimensions.

@>∫T: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) < ∑∏> §ð<<S∂ (still mind form or world).

So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:

  1. Ði: Informative particles/heads: §ð
  2.  Ð: limbs/potentials: momentum: $t.
  3. Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏.
  4.  Ðimotion: entropy: S∂.
  5. Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.

Organic Worldcycle of 5D motions=actions of space-time. Mathematical & biologic properties: Whys of physics.

 

 So let us deal with the fundamental principles, those of the mind view and measure (relativity, mind paradox); those of ternary symmetries of timespace arrows and its conservation laws, and the dualities of holographic dimensions, which are the first deductions of the 5D² structure of physics. It is then necessary to consider three type of properties which have been grossly ignored or misunderstood in classic physics but become essential in 5D:
– The co-existence of multiple scales, which determines the organic properties between them.
-The reproductive nature of motion, which reproduces information along the path of a wave. And since all form has a dimension of time-motion; all is a reproductive Universe.
– The ‘sentient’ properties of particle-points and singularities which in each scale of the physical Universe gauge information into still minds, whose linguistic geometric ‘image-mirror’ of reality ‘perceives in itself’. 
Those properties are NOT all susceptible to be explained mathematically, so the dogma that so well serves the reductionist vision of mathematical physics ultimately caused by the ego of humans, no longer holds. Even if mathematics will be the leading language, we are authorised to explain with verbal, evolutionary laws many of the whys of physics.

The problem of mathematical physics…

is then clear – it kills with abstraction the life interpretation of reality and this is specially truth of quantum physics, which obviously we reject in its Copenhagen interpretation as a mere o-1 probability translation of the real 1-∞ population=statistical interpretation provided by the pilot-wave theory, the iterpretation that fits like a glove with 5D and totally erases the need to do huge adaptations to a freaky scale outside the laws of 5D2.
 The only apparent problem of pilot-wave theory is in fact a strength of 5D: the existence of a scale below our perceived last eye-electronic-light scale, which is the quantum potential field, faster than light that allows entanglement and action at distance. Once this is plugged in, as it should in 5D scalar Universes, all becomes really a copycat of thermodynamic statistics as Einstein said it will…
But of course this, we know since Bell’s theorem and yet nobody cares. So I repeat, I won’t fight the arrogant ego-trips of the high popes of science, aka quantum physicists, as IT IS NOT MY TASK TO TRANSLATE TO THE PROPER FORMALISM A HUGE DISCIPLINE WITH 100 YEARS OF MASSIVE INVESTMENTS due to the nature of our technological civilization where the machine is the idol of the homunculus with big hands, big mouth and little peanut brain who cares nothing for the whys of knowledge – to me epitomized by the quantum physicist.
Indeed, the quantum physicist just love the idea that he only understands the language of god, numbers, and so will have none of it – pilot wave theory – because the Universe must be creationist, just because that makes him a pope of high jargons, operators and things made so confused by all the normalization cumbersome processes of quantum maths in the wrong version that nobody would dare not to say he is very intelligent, as I will do – savant idiots, that is.
So a fast image of the ‘dimensional application’ to physics of the vital organic principles:

Only though a proper understanding of the laws of fractal space and cyclical time will allow us to properly interpret mathematical physics and all sciences by extension, and then discharge the redundant ‘metaphorical complicated equations’ creationists are so hard working, as those poetic societies ever producing longer cacophonies instead of the terse verses of reality.

In that sense there is so much work to do to focus again that mathematical mirror because of the creationist and literalist working hard with its ‘magic’ since the Popes, Kepler, Galileo and Newton declared its religious zeal, so it was good NOT to fully understand down to earth its mathematical equations that frankly having cracked that window so long ago, it amazes me the blindness of our ‘self-appointed’ genius of science.

Consider only another bit of it on those equations of Einstein’s relativity, where time is ‘packed in all its dimensions’ as the present ∂t derivative of space-speed. Physicists go merrily playing with its magic, and it ‘works’. But wait a second… only systems with the same dimension can compare and transform into each other. So how 3 space dimensions and one time dimension work? The magic here is that the height dimension is the ‘static dimension’ of information related to time which stores in its cyclical clocks, in its frequency and form the information of the Universe. So a clock is ‘besides’ the flat plane of space’, a ‘tall form’. And so we NEED to give height as a dimension of time, then time is the bit/frequency of the cycle, and the flat surface of space – the flat Universe, the flat plane, is the form that moves lineally. So again we see how black holes are ‘tall’ IN THE CENTER OF A TIME-LIKE accelerated clock vortex:

We are all systems of temporal energy transformed into information through the infinite actions and systems of the Universe.

In the jargon of physics we talk of clocks of cyclical time that carry in their frequency the information of the Universe – charges and masses – moved by body waves of energy that occupy a certain vacuum space. In biology we talk of heads, brains and cellular nuclei that process information, moved by bodies and cytoplasm. Each system will display a certain type of ‘vital space’ self-centered into a singularity that processes information with a different network of logic paths, though particles, genes, chips or brains, but all those systems will obey to certain laws natural to the 2 formal motions that ultimate explain the game of ‘creation and extinction’ of systems of energy and information, which is the dynamic universe.

Physical systems are always made of a wave of energy and a particle of information and one cannot exist without the other (complementary principle of quantum physics). And both run on a potential field that provides them with the entropic motion to fuel the system.

Biological beings are also made with a head of information and a body that processes energy and moves it – or in cellular organisms, with a nucleus of DNA-information and a cytoplasmic body that moves it.

Sociological systems are divided into networks of upper class cells/citizens who control the languages of information of society and its working, body class that reproduces the products the body needs to survive.

All those concepts are equivalent but we need to refer them in each science to its specific jargon, elements and quantitative analysis.

In fact, the first breakthrough to achieve an all encompassing view of sciences, which put together the concepts of energy and information took place in physics, with the discovery of the fundamental unit of the universe, the action of energy and time.

Max Planck the founder of quantum physics discovered in the 1900s that the Universe was made of actions, not of substance but of motions, composed  of energy and time: Å = E x Ti. Light, the ultimate substance of creation was a motion composed of two different motions, cyclical clocks of time, and lineal motions.

Energy and Time clocks are two types of motions; so the universe was made of motions not of substances, a maya of the senses… This Galileo already noticed when he said e pur si muove e pur no muove. That is, the Earth moves but it seems to be still, so our eyes can perceive and gauge information.

Those simple principles are the essence of the duality of the Universe, from where all other laws of science can be deduced.

For example, the most important ‘simple law’ of the Universe, regarding the power and SURVIVAL OF a system is the law of balance, between the energy and information body and head wave and particle (synchronized in the right models of quantum physics: those of Einstein->Broglie-Bohm).

Yet we can deduce that law from 5D metric S x T = K, as a multiplication maximizes a total sum, when S=T, the equation of balance, beauty, immortality…

Indeed, we generalize the principle to all systems, and write, energy as E, Time, as I, and actions as their product, ExI, which is maximized by a simple mathematical law, when E=I (if we consider the local concept of a given energy enclosed by a singularity-membrane of information).  So 5 x 5 is bigger than 8 x 2.

This equation E=I or S=T, which implies all systems seek a balance between its spatial energy and temporal information is the new fundamental equation of XXI century science.

As it describes all the systems of the Universe, as complex systems of energy and time, in permanent motion, gauging information, moving with energy, and combining both, exi, to create, decouple and reproduce similar systems, in an immortal Universe made of infinite fractal complementary systems of energy and time, including you, who sometimes say ´i dont have energy and time to do this.

As actions of energy and time performed with your system is all what you or any entity of the Universe does.

The graph, which is all over the web (: because it is essential, shows this vital role of dimensions in the construction of space-time beings.

So ‘a bidimensional wave’ transforms into a ‘bidimensional particle’. Because as we say both have the same dimension; IT IS JUST A QUESTION OF READRESSING THEM IN A FUNDAMENTAL FACT TO ADAPT 4D formalisms to 5D³ physics:
Time has the dimension of motion and the dimension of perceptive Height.
Space has the dimension of length and the dimension of reproductive width.
This view, on the stop and go bidimensionality of the wave or particle/vortex that come together to create a 4-dimensional fermion is thus a good point to introduce, the Galilean paradox and the Holographic principle of bidimensionality and equality of space-time dimensions and its balances, which were the beginning of Physics and relativity, but we need to upgrade from the ƥst view.

In the graph, systems are made of different dimensional parts, ‘literally’, as we shall see when studying different species.

Points have inner parts, and so instead of 0 we give it 1Dimension / 1 probability.

Lines are the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, so motion is a lineal or planar dimension (1D-2D, when we consider its points to have volume).

A reproductive wave however needs a 3rd dimension of width to reproduce (2D-3D if we give its points-lines a volume, as we shall do when completing the postulates of non-euclidean geometry – of fractal points with parts).

Thus most systems of nature are organic systems that ensemble moving limbs/fields, spherical particles/heads (as the sphere is the topology which stores more information in lesser space) and finally reproductive body-waves. This is obvious in biological systems, but how it works for physical systems? It doesn’t in the @nthropomorphic method of huminds, which reject them for physical systems, it does in reality. And so we shall start by cracking the less accepted of all parts of beings, the @-singularity.

ALGEBRAIC AGE. FUNCTIONS: T= ƒ(S)

The analysis of mathematical operandi is an essential task both in mathematics and its immediate praxis, classic physics as it reveals a basic quality of the fractal Universe:

The synoptic quality of reality in which groups of equal beings, ‘numbers’, either in time (frequency series of world cycles) or space (memorial simultaneous populations reproduced in those worldcycles) form wholes, which become units of a larger dimension as ‘single beings’.

It is hardly understood that mathematical operandi are the precise manner in which those processes of social evolution of numbers are studied by the mind. So much of the evolution of mathematics has been to ‘gather individuals into universals’, similar beings into numbers, numbers into variables, variables into integrals, and  functions, and functions into functionals, to keep reaching ‘bigger structures’ of reality which encode according to the immanent laws of ∆ºst, the information ‘branched backwards’ in time or sidewards in space of the whole in a synoptic equation.

Operandi then express the relationships between the parts of the whole, which solved, gives us a solution to one of the 8 motions, ratios of energy/information (constants), 3 ages, 3 topologies, duration and extension of a given part or whole of a supœrganism’ world cycle.

Its use thus is related to the description of the different kind of isomorphisms in time and space that define a being: its bidimensional, ternary, 5-active, 6 species, 8-motions and 9 scales… and it is important to properly define each operandi and for what kind of isomorphism of ∆ºst beings is useful as a prolegomena to its proper use and understanding in mathematical physics.

Now, when we dealt with operandi in physics, we remark that:

Tº: Trigonometric functions are the essential operandi of Time-dominant periodic motions.

∆i: Integrals and derivatives are the main operandi of ∆-dominant planes of parts and wholes.

: And polynomials are the operandi of social growth between ∆-planes. As we establish 3 ‘scalar’ 3 x 3 growths it follows we need also 3 operandi in that growth, which is the simplest ±, next the x/ duality and finally the polynomial/logarithmic duality, Log Xª

So we must deal with trigonometric functions to study periodic motion; with integrals to study wholes and parts, and polynomials to study the simplest Spatial herds.

±;  x /; ln xª; ∂∫: Generator’s Operandi: social gathering of space & time quanta.

This means that mathematical physics can be reduced not only to certain mathematical syntax, but in as much as the mathematical syntax derives also of the Universal grammar of the Generator Equation, we can also explain mathematical physics as a variation of the Generator of fractal space-time beings.

Indeed, as we explain in our articles on maths for a more general case, the mathematical operandi of all real mathematical entities can be reduced to a ‘ternary’ scale of growth:

± ‘social scalar equations’ with minimal variation/evolution on the nature of the social number.

x/ ‘product/division equations’, which is a second degree of growth; and also the ideal formulation of S x T = K 5D metric relationships

xª log finally is the 3 scale of growth beyond which as in all ∆st-ructures the limit of organisation of self-similar beings is reached and we need to CROSS A LIMIT BETWEEN ∆±1 systems.

AND THIS IS REACHED with the marvellous new ‘operandi’, the true miracle of mathematics (as it has never been quite understood, due to the incomprehension of the duality of continuous/discontinuous systems, and the ‘limits of infinity and infinitesimal):

∫∂ derivatives and integrals, which DO cross between ∆o and ∆±1 and change from an S to a T state or symmetry.

So, for ∆-scales and the transformations that happen often in entities which play a Tiƒ, ‘head-point’ role in ∆-1, and a spatial, Spe role in ∆, according to the general role that ‘all head-particles of a system become cellular points, slaves of its larger super organism’, we need always to deal with ∂∫ & differential equations.

Yet in a single plane for most of its ‘rough’ physics, we don’t really need differential equations but ± equations of the form S±T=0 and equations which respond to 5D metric of the form S x T = ∆st.

They respond roughly to the wave equations in present (S±t=0) and the ∆±1 dual past-field x Future-particle = K1 (we can always make the constant 1) type of equations.

Finally combining both, another ‘state of reality’, the ST present wave also appears constantly in physics, which tend to be more complicated as often includes the 3 elements, making it all a full-descriptive type of equality:

St (wave) = S x T (field x particle) where st tends to be a wave of energy; or St = S ± t, where S and T tend to be representations of the 2 elements of st (S being for example kinetic energy and t being potential energy).

So the rule is basically this:

§-equations: when we are in a present social equation on the same plane with similar events, we ad elements (as when we ad the potential and kinetic energy observed in the ∆+1 gravitational scale).

∆±1: But when we are in a scalar equation, which responds to the  ∆±1 different relationship between an ∆+1 particle, which absorbs quanta from an ∆-1 scale, we multiply them according to 5D metric. Why? Obviously because what the particle of information does is to create a network≈knot with the smaller parts. And so when we calculate those ‘parts’ which are more numerous we multiply them.

I.e. If we have 10 neurons, each with 10 axons, which are its smaller lineal entropic parts, the number of ‘connections of the network’, will be 10 x 10 = 100 as each neuron connects to all others, NOT 10 + 10. But if we are just adding 2 sets of 10 neurons of two types we have 20 of them.

So + is a basic operandi for a single present scale; x is a basic operandi for a relationship between scales.

It is then obvious that mathematical physics was born in physical studies, intimately related to the social gathering of space and time quanta.

Of them the most pervading ones are related to ‘present waves of energy’; and past x Future, fields x Particles equations.

In this cases we tend to find a system with 4 variables; as fields are represented by 3 vectors and the time element by a single parameter of time=1/frequency (which in GST we merely invert to have it written in cyclical πime). Hence the all pervading description of a field>particle with 4 x,y,z,t parameters.

Evolving mathematics to evolve physics.

‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’

“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe.’ Schopenhauer.

‘2 things I deem infinite the stupidity of man and the Universe’.

‘Science should only be concerned and study phenomena that has already happened.’Einstein

5D PHYSICS, ITS METHODS OF INQUIRE AND SUB-FIELDS

The 5Сmotions of reality mirrored by all languages and systems define the main symmetries between the two abstract ‘units’ of Euclidean mathematics – the geometric spatial continuous points (S@) and the sequential, scalar, social numbers, ∆ð void of vital and inner properties, by the æntropic principle of human SIMPLIFYing languages. AS SUCH because HUMANS strip of vital, organic, scalar and sentient properties all species through the use of those limited mathematical languages, the more so when more remote and difficult to understand in terms of similarity as a T.œ is (ab. Timespace supœrganism) mathematics became the only language of physics, as we describe physical T.ŒS FAR REMOVED from the human point of view in scale, time duration and form, with minimalist external properties, notably its 2Dimotion of locomotion and 4Dimotion of entropy, suitable for human ab=use and extraction of energy – hence the science of human physics, itself a small part of the stience of physics, which includes also all those properties of galatoms and its molecular ensembles, physical entropic forces and larger ensembles of wholes.

Points are a ‘dominant’ spatial, mental view which reside in a single plane and the ‘mind’ perceives in stillness, with no internal scalar form and continuity when associated into lines, planes and volumes; even though in reality they have ‘fractal content’ as Non-Euclidean points; and hence breath, its lines are therefore waves able to communicate the external form and internal energy or fractal networks that branch to connect multiple points, and its planes intersection of three of such waves or networks that form topological organisms…

Numbers then, are dominant in ‘scalar’ social properties and sequential temporal causal properties, best to describe the inner ‘vital energy of those points’, its discrete configurations, and all the functions that express its Dimotions. Numbers it follow are more complete than points as time-motions are more fundamental than the spatial mental forms we make of them.

However in the entangled Universe ALL its ST-beings as fractals of the whole participate of the 5 Dimensional Motions of existence, ¬∆@st, ¬; so they will have limits, ¬, in space and time beyond which they break its form into entropy; ∆-scales internal to the T.œ, (cells, atoms, etc.) and be inscribed in a larger world, ∆+1 that sets those limits, will display the 3 Spatial canonical topologies of any 5D system in its own organic parts (|imbfields, bodywaves & particheads), evolving through an arrow of increasing information parameters and decreasing motion through its 3 temporal ages. And to survive and function, it will need NOT to be blind in that vital, entangled Universe, so the T.œ, will have @ singularity-mind of relative stillness that will act as a center of a referential language to be able to perform the 5 @tions of existence that reflect in a fractal, minimalist cyclical bit of time quanta and local space territory, its needs to perform those 5 Dimotions of relative exist¡ence also within a limited number of perceptive scales, where to feed on lower entropy ∆-4, to move, lower information, ∆-3 to perceive, lower energy, ∆-2 to feed, and emit lower ∆-1 cells to reproduce, evolve palingentically, emerge as a clone, ∆o of the being, and thus survive beyond the ¬ limits of time=death and space=decay, its T.œ will experience.

As all is a fractal mirror of a larger world-whole, all this properties will not only define fully all what is needed to know of the world cycle of exist¡ence of a relative T.œ, but will be able to describe, its parts, its wholes, its organs, and even its languages, whose internal structure will reflect in its grammar and parts, also all those elements. 

So we will also be able to describe all physical systems with the Pentalogic of ¬∆@st, as a mirror reflection of the larger Universe. And yet because huminds understand near nothing of the larger picture, of the fractal game of exist¡ences, and are as all other points, self-centered in its mind-language, limiting the vital properties of all other entities, ab=using them as open systems of entropy from where to extract motion for its @tions (actions performing by the will of a mind), this clear picture of the entangled, self-similar universe will be distorted by the æntropic principle of antropomorphism (man as the center and highest point of existence, which therefore must debase everything else including the intelligence of the Universe to come on top) and entropic behavior (man as the top predator destroyer of worlds, to absorb energy for its own creative processes), we must consider all humind’s languages as mirrors of reality distorted by the æntropic principle and so half-truths this blog will try to enlighten so the nebulous picture by lack of information or too clear one, by simplification, acquires the richness of grey proper of the pentalogic entangled Universe.

In the case of physical systems this distortion is maybe the largest among natural sciences, (social sciences are far more distorted as they are not even sciences, at all, that is they lack predictive capacity, miss elements, distort data, and all in all in 5D epistemology can only be considered praxis of power and idol-ogies of metal, as we study them in other posts)…

Physics at least DOES respect data (save in its grand theory of the big-bang), PROPERLY fits it in mathematical equations (which despite its simplicity by lacking points with breath is still a mirror of enormous quality) can predict fairly well the deterministic or probabilistic futures of its species, and as a consequence of it, gifts humans of a remarkable capacity to ‘create’ in its mental territory of order, new forms with its aggregates of social number-points atomic structures.

All this is known and we shall not repeat an encyclopedia of physics. Our interest is to highlight the biased æntropic errors and fill the gaps of modeling with ¬∆@st elements, humind’s physics lacks.

Locomotion as reproduction

In space, by adjacency, and in time by frequency locomotion measures consecutive adjacent reproductions of a physical wave-particle form in space

 

IN 5D ALL SYSTEMS perform 3 simpler actions, perception, motion and feeding on energy to reproduce the system.

And 2 scalar action: social evolution and its inverse entropic death.

So when those 3±I actions=dimotions are studied we have a whole understanding of the system.

What are then the 5D UNDERLYING VITAL, organic principles of physical systems that make them akin to those of any scale?

  • 1,2,3D: Locomotion, which embodies the simpler actions through its fundamental concept, that of AN ACTION of a particle, in its path through a field of forces in which IT FEEDS, reproduces and AS A RESULT OF BOTH, MOVES. Reason why locomotion is the physical EXISTENTIAL ACTION that embodies all other simpler actions, as the graph shows..
  • ∆±¡:4,5D: Entropic scattering, according to collision (loss of vital momentum) and angle (4th postulate of perpendicularity) vs. social evolution under an informative force (normally gravitation), which are the scalar actions of the system

So because Locomotion implies for physical systems, ‘perception in particle state-stop’; feeding on the energy of the lower field and reproduction by adjacent imprinting in wave state-motion; for PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, locomotion embodies the 3 simplest actions of the being; to which we just must add its ‘changes of state’ as its actions of physical d=evolution, to fully have an organic analysis of the species.

Thus the field of theoretical 5D physics has 3 huge sub-fields as in all other stiences:

  1. The study of its METRIC equations and super organisms of physics through its 3 conserved parts (angular membrane, lineal singularity and energy between them).
  2. The study of locomotion or its simplest actions.
  3. And the study of the scalar states of physical systems, either Thermodynamics, or quantum statistics.

Fields then which then can be used to study in detail each ‘subspecies’ of physics, all of which will obey those laws.

We are in this post focusing on the 3rd element, its scales and species of each scale.

In that regard the field of scalar physics can simply be divided in 4 main subfields, each one an interval from the perspective of the self-centered human and its ternary symmetry: $t<Si=Te>§ð

This further stresses the ‘5D, organic nature of physics’ and the Galatom. We talk thus of:

$t: ∆+1> Human size physics and its larger outside ∆+1 world or Earth’s physics or Mechanics, focused on the 2nd Dimotions, locomotion.

Te: ∆o: Human size physics and its inner ∆-1 world or ‘thermodynamics’, studied by the so called Statistical physics or Thermodynamics; which is corresponding to the ‘present size’ and hence symmetric to Si≈Te, to be considered the Te, entropic state of physics. Hence the Dimotions of Energy and Entropy.

Si: ∆o: Human size physics and its inner ∆-1 world or ‘electromagnetism’, studied by the so called Electrodynamics; which is corresponding to the ‘present size’ and hence symmetric to Si≈Te, to be considered the informative ordered state of human physics, focused in the informative dimotion of 1D electronic perception.

As Thermodynamics becomes the energy of our body, and Electromagnetism the substance of our brain.

§ð: ∆±|3|: Molecular size physics, belonging to the inner cell, and ruled by quantum physics and the equivalent astrophysics belonging to the larger scales of the galatom.

In 5D the AntiÐisymmetries of those four disciplines of physics enrich our understanding of them, as they will become paradoxically inverted in its nature, syntax and structure, because of the relative roles they play.

We though studied this mirror reflections and complex Antisymmetries, Symmetries, Disymmetries, Asymmetries and Bisymmetries of pentalogic in other posts, as they would rise too high the level of incomprehension of this blog already stratospheric 😈.

What we shall attempt thus in this post and its sub-post is just to develop the laws of the four sub-disciplines of physics by scale in an introductory level, as usual drawing from my illustrated favorite Lindau’s encyclopedia of physics, which I consider the best work on the subject of the past century, with Ad ons from wikipedia for easy copyrights.

In this general post we shall use more concepts of 5D, while in the four sub-posts on Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Electromagnetism and Quantum  physics try to follow more an illustrated classic discourse after showing the fundamental concepts of 5D to correspond to those of Physics in ANY scale (principles of conservation of energy and momentums, least action principle, Hamiltonians and Lagrangians) to which we add the ages of physical systems and the interaction between scales.

 

Today physics has become the job of stupids, which of course believe to be the high priests of magic mathematics, the misunderstood language of the Universe. We shall thus first introduce an enhanced system of mathematical numbers, points and operandi, which correspond to the 3 upgraded elements of ‘social scales=numbers’, topological networks of fractal space=points and flows of time=operandi that define the Universe, as mathematics is just another mirror reflection of the Universe, perhaps the most ‘synoptic’ and wide after the I-logic language of T.œs, that is the Disomorphisms of space-time themselves. 

A Universe of space forms: S@ and time motions: ∆ð

All what you see around is a tapestry of forms that are moving (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the scientific term ‘entropy’.

Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail at ‘smaller’ scales, the form also shows motion. Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.

Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.

And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:

All clocks of time are cyclical motions which break reality into an inner region of vital energy, an angular momentum clock that encloses it and when regular a central singularity which can ‘perceive’ some how a mapping of the Universe that flows through the membrane. So mind, angular momentum and vital energy become the 3 parts of the clock and hence the basic super organism of the Universe.

Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).

Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum). Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:

The evolution of maths improves the mirror, its ternary syntax.

It does of course because any mirror-image of reality even if unfocused carries some information about it, and works for the distorted mind view, which let us remember is NOT REALITY BUT ALWAYS A LINGUISTIC MAPPING: Œ-Mind <linguistic perception> ∞ Universe, and so any mirror does carry a minimal information to be useful to departure a whole:

In the graph, linguistic mirrors create minds with different amounts of information, useful to guide reality. We must not though confuse the mirror with reality, the a priori element.

All this said is easy to understand mathematics, its elements and disciplines as a mirror of the Universe.

For the scientist who will consider all this nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and all is there, the answer is yes, all is in the mirror but with less detail. So maths as the universe does, has also 3∆st+º sub disciplines, it has also a fractal ‘derivative’ structure and it is also about space-time.

THOSE 3 main sub-disciplines code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

  • ∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).
  • Geometrical space, (Spe) and its unit, fractal points.
  • Temporal algebra (tiƒ) and its units, sequential numbers.

And it has its ST ‘combinations of which the most important its topology (the study of form with motion).

Moreover the mirror of mathematics has evolved to explain in more detail the ‘actions of space-time’ of beings; as all languages do improving its ternary grammar. So words developed first ‘names only’ (forms), then motions ( active verbs) and finally ‘complements’ (complex systems).

And colour languages moved from dual B&W, to three colors (red-entropy, blue, form, green energy) to four, adding green/yellow mixes.

So today maths has evolved into multiple space-time disciplines. For example spatial geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with sequential time numbers that finally dominated the discipline, while topology which is geometry of space with motion in time, today added ∆-scales (as it is defined with networks of ∆-1 points).

Dogma and flexibility – evolution of languages.

All this is said to remark a key concept that escapes mathematical physicists:

No language-mirror is absolute in its truth, but an evolving system, which goes through three ages

So when written words appeared pharaohs just said ‘it has written=truth’. Today in the far younger mathematical discipline, scientists say ‘it is an equation=it is a truth’.

Only latter words were known to be also fictions, a fact that also happens with equations but few scientists do recognise. So maths has still a ‘religious, dogmatic outlook’ proper of all languages, even if it has already gone into a ‘third baroque, inflationary  informative age of excessive formal content’ and split into multiple similar ‘metaphors’ (languages being inflationary as mirrors-minds are multiple, watching a single perspective do offer multiple views of a single event, hence the multiple equations observed to describe the same physical event).

But religious people, aka dogmatic physicists do NOT understand all this about their mirror-language of mathematics.

For many of them, equations ‘are’ always truth, just when written, and other languages are NOT truth – dogmas we only find in fundamentalist verbal thought (God speaks only in Arab, so Koran cannot be translated as it looses its truth).

Of course, languages do have also ‘quantitative’ measure. So while all carry an image, some are better and we prefer a carrot picture than a drawing.

So, we concede maths after images, is the best mind-mirror known to man, as it carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in TV celebrities more than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, and overcome religious words. Still as Einstein put it ‘I know when maths is truth but not real’, meaning we need experimental analysis of mathematical truths and so NOT just because we can write an imaginary particle with maths, the particle will exist (Susy, evaporating holes etc). IT IS AN EGO ERROR, TO THINK then that maths is always truth and an even bigger ego-error to think maths is not experimental but produced by the human mind, which becomes a short of ‘God’ that talks maths as only God does (that was the idea of Kepler: god has taken 5000 – biblical – years to found an intelligent like his, me).

The extension of mathematical truths. Languages imprint reality inversely to its complexity.

So yes, maths do create as any language does reality as a mirror around the territory of the mind, since ultimately the essence of space is to be a tapestry of an infinite number of frames or reference self-centred on the monads of each scale of Nature.

However as languages are shared by multiple minds, when a language is ‘so extended’ because it is use by ‘selfs’ of the minimalist scales of space (in the case of maths, it is obviously the language in which the euclidean dimensions of light is written, while its non-euclidean fractal points are the language in which masses and charges are better described), the language’s truths have a quasi-infinite number of applications. Still many elements of GST cannot be explained with maths, but ALL elements of reality can be explained with the laws of GST. So above maths there is at least a language the NON-Æ LOGIC OF FRACTAL CYCLICAL space-time, described in those texts.

Further on, there is a limit to the distortion and lack of focus of a language that finally becomes blind when too far removed from GST ultimate principles. i.e a B&W picture of a Rothko’s painting will not be relevant failing to see the vibrations of colours, essence of it. 

A math description of Gospel will fail to grasp the expression of social love and the ∆-arrow of evolution expressed on it.

And in general, excessively formal, third age baroque languages, are inflations and fictions which fail to express reality, as reality to exist must have ternary elements, entropy x information = energy, which means entropy simplifies always reality as pure language-information alone does NOT mix, imprint entropy-motion, which tends to simplicity. Water and oil then become disjointed and oil fails to explain water:

As the mind mirror of any language – not only mathematics, also human verbal mirrors – must ‘imprint’ the entropic motions of reality which resist its distortion, the final effect of baroque=max. informative languages is relatively limited both to describe accurately and distort/order reality.

This is truth specially in the physical world with maths because the physical world is simple and the range of imprinting almost infinite – not so much in the smaller territory of order of each mind-species, which indeed becomes ‘created’ by the tiƒ-singularity center, as it is a limited range. In the next graph we show fully that interaction, which in maths would mean a Tiƒ=pov=center of reference of a graph will order an extension, with a range inversely proportional to the content of information it delivers (range of forces, maximal for the ones with less information, minimal with the weak force of maximal form):

The proper way to understand the interaction between minds, scales and st parameters.

Now because physicists understand little on the ways mind-mirrors and universe interact with each other, and the bias of the humind in the analysis of reality, many of the errors of maths will derive of the ‘egotist error’ (mind paradox, as an infinitesimal which believes to be infinite)

Consider the copenhagen interpretation, which bohm did debunk properly but requires further understanding of the concepts of quantum physics not as a mental game of observers, but as a distorted human view on the limiting scale of our mind perception, given the properties of 5D metric. 

Ie. as we go down in scales we loose information (uncertainty principles), we are coarse in our interference (observer’s influence) and beings accelerate in time as they diminish in space, so we make all kind of errors confusing time cycles as spatial forms, since our slow clocks see the being’s sequences in time all together in a simple timespace quanta as a spatial form.

So here it is the ‘mind view’ what we must eliminate, specially two recurrent errors:

-To see time events which are ternary as spatial different forms: i.e., 3 quarks cannot be broken, why? Answer: because they are likely not three quarks in space udu, but three ages of a time transformation: u>d>u.

-To ignore each new scale is made of wholes and parts and when we ad new scales we must ad more parts, so instead of functions we use functionals and operators (functions of functions), NOT because quantum systems are weird, mathematical beings made of nebulous operators, but because we are integrating in our perception, multiple scales – same for Hilbert spaces – there is not ∞ dimensions but we penetrate for each system we measure into its parts, which are its inner dimensions. But without a proper definition of dimensions all gets messy conceptually as it is now the case.

And ad as a proof the relationship between maths and organic GST laws and perspectives, to make of vital mathematics and its sub discipline, physics a complete description of the Universe.

So the ∆ST isomorphic methods relating all to the 4 ∆• parameters will become the key to ‘complete’ and upgrade maths and its main sub discipline, physics (: as we have done with all other disciplines.

The messed views of quantum physics today.
An added problem in quantum physics is the RASHOMON effect of multiple mathematical abstract descriptions, born of two facts – the inflationary nature of languages of information that can see the same process from many perspectives, and the multiplicity of authors of quantum physics, which became an ego fight that further created multiple points of view.

Quantum Physics was NOT the work of a single mind-point, which as Planck put it, is the way in which a theory reaches its consistent worldview. So it is a bit of a mess, because each ‘ego’ tried to bring its view, under the Rashomon effect of multiple points of view and mathematical equations to define the same ‘reality’. The specific qualities of quantum 5D metric – to be the furthest regions of perception, hence those with minimal size and maximal time speed ($pe x ðiƒ = ∆-3,4), MEANT also that our perception of it was:

-Blurred by distance, which creates uncertainty.

-Multiplied in forms of space and time cycles perceive by unit of human measure, as the 5D metric made them so small and fast in its worldcycles that we did see a lot of ensembles together, of states together, of parts together…

The conjunction of those elements explains both the complexity of the @-humind view of quantum physics, as we humans try to get a spatial fixed mental form (in this case mathematical to reflect ALL the elements of the experiment and WITH TOTAL deterministic.

And the task of fit all the possible states together, discerning which were ‘events in time’ and ‘forms in space’, measure them, with brute huge elements, set the philosophical problems of quantum physics. It made all the practitioners to multiply its views. And the idealist to ‘imaging’ the maths using to describe it were real.

In such ‘theoretical surfaces’ of vital energy fluxes of thought the need for a domain limiting the initial singularity point and final enclosing membrane for the theory to make sense, were sorely needed. And they would be the ones to remain. Let us then define ‘quantum theory’ in terms of a T.œ mind-mirror organism in itself and apply the Rashomon effect:

  • @ view. The first singularity humind thought – that of Bohr’s subjective interpretations would remain, and the last enclosing membrane, that of Hilbert, would become the ‘limits’ of the domain of quantum formalism.
  • ∆§-1: lower plane. All in all as time passed, the usual first last eclectic guy to come was the one to ‘google’ it. And this was Von Neumann with its probabilistic and Hilbert’s space but with a degree of formal complexity ill understood. Why indeed, we cast quantum physics in a complex Hilbert space? It is an important question, because the Hilbert, complex space acts as the ‘substrata’, or potential field of all possible forms of a quantum system, enclosed with the algebraic and geometric forms of a Hilbert space.As we will see, the state-spaces of quantum mechanics are special kinds of vector spaces, known as Hilbert spaces, and they have more internal structure than their classical counterparts.A structure is a set of elements on which certain operations and relations are defined, a mathematical structure is just a structure in which the elements are mathematical objects (numbers, sets, vectors) and the operations mathematical ones, and a model is a mathematical structure used to represent some physically significant structure in the world.The heart and soul of quantum mechanics is contained in the Hilbert spaces that represent the state-spaces of quantum mechanical systems. The internal relations among states and quantities, and everything this entails about the ways quantum mechanical systems behave, are all woven into the structure of these spaces, embodied in the relations among the mathematical objects which represent them. This means that understanding what a system is like according to quantum mechanics is inseparable from familiarity with the internal structure of those spaces. Know your way around Hilbert space, and become familiar with the dynamical laws that describe the paths that vectors travel through it, and you know everything there is to know, in the terms provided by the theory, about the systems that it describes.

But the problem is as the same Newman would infamously notice is that mathematicians do NOT yet know what an imaginary complex number really means and what is a Hilbert space, beyond its mathematical rules.

So they don’t really know as we do, having cracked the Disomorphisms between mathematical spaces and st laws, what truly is the explanation of some strange forms of quantum physics.

In that regard, by ‘know your way around’ Hilbert space, I mean something more than possess a description or a map of it; anybody who has a quantum mechanics textbook on their shelf has that.

I mean know your way around it in the way you know your way around the map of the city in which you live. Where you now physically by direct experience BESIDES the abstract map, the real nature of the signs of the map and the buildings it describes. This means  a practical kind of knowledge that comes by understanding the Disomorphisms between @nalytic geometry and its planes and space-time laws, which then can easily explain the complexity of quantum physics.

We have done so already by stating that as ∆-3,4 is the furthest region from our perception, the mapping ‘potential’ ∆-1 space-time graph we must use must be the more complex possible to fit at ‘once’ all the populations and potential events of the small, smart, fast, populous herds of quantum entities we must describe. Hence quantum’s complexity is yet another proof of 5D metric. And we shall refer you to the last part of the post on @nalytic geometry to fully grasp the meaning of dot products, basis, imaginary numbers, Hermitian operators, conjugates and all that ‘nice jargon’ on ‘things’  nobody ‘understand’ but get used to them (something Feynman jokingly explained).

This said, the second great Rashomon duality to consider on quantum physics is the wave-particle complementarity principle, which you might probably have understood already as it is all over the place. As particles are still in-form-ative systems that gauge information in a relative still point of perception and then move as waves, imprinting by reproduction the lower ∆-1 field (graph). So for the understanding of quantum particles, atomic physics, we shall broadly divide the field in two sections (though in principle each post works on a single plane), this post working mostly on systems that are dominant in wave states – light and electrons; vs. the z-particle/atomic post which works mostly on the understanding of particles, atoms and its micro-macro symmetry with galactic systems.

Now briefly we have resolved you some conundrums on the interpretation of quantum physics: the wave-particle duality, the abstract representation and what it means – a Hilbert space is the more complex mental space that can fit most parts of it.

We might add also why we prefer probability to statistics in descriptions of quantum physics. The answer is again the structure of the mathematical mirror we cast on it. In the mirror there is for the ∆-i smaller populous scales, the ∆o-1 scale or unit circle OF probability OR Riemann’s sphere, which is in fact (Measure theory) isomorphic to the ∆+1-∞ plane in space.

Hence the reason why we prefer probability for description of quantum systems, is merely that the ideal mathematical reflection of the 0-1Dimension of emergence of fast, multiple worldcycles of ‘finitesimal beings’ happens IN TIME, not as in its 1-∞ spatial larger mirror.

But both are ultimately describing similar scales, reason why Einstein’s dictum that at the end quantum would be shown to be equal to the statistical description of thermodynamic molecules has come in these posts, when/if i can finish up the huge load of the web, and complete the fourth line. And only then we will again deny Feynman’s quip on the impossiblity to understand what quantum physics means, as it will be a realist view interpreted through the Hilbert/complex plane and o-1 sphere of probabilities to fit the ginormous, ultrafast T.œs and worldcycles of quantum systems.

Quantum physics from the photon to the electron are the background space-time that dominates the  ∆-3 (Spe: 10ˆ20) plane. We must then find 5 equations of its motions, departing from the most studied, loco-motion equation of physics, the schrodinger’s equations, dismiss the astounding absurd interpretation of the guru of power physics of the age, Mr. Bohr, who had the chuptzah of imposing its opinion AGAINST THE sound-sound realist theories of the true discoverers of those equations: Einstein (photoelectric effect), which was taken further by De Broglie (duality particle-wave, neutrino theory of light) and finally completed by Schrodinger (physical interpretation of density wave, evolved from de broglie) and completed by Bohm (noticing the quantum potential around c-speed or neutrino field origin of the light reproductive motion through its potential quantum paths), and Feynman (symbolism and analysis of those further paths as stories).

In quantum mechanics the state of the system is given in its mathematical description by a vector of Hilbert space. Such quantities as energy, impulse, and moment of momentum are investigated by means of self-adjoint operators. For example, the possible energy levels of an electron in an atom are computed as eigenvalues of the energy operator. The differences of these eigenvalues give the frequencies of the emitted quantum of light and thus define the structure of the radiation spectrum of the given substance. The corresponding states of the electron are here described as eigenfunctions of the energy operator.

But as this is TRULY the difference with normal reality AS we are PROBING the quantum level, where the minimal forms with maximal information perceivable to man exist, we need to use quantum values, that become an infinite ‘dimensional’ space in the absurd jargon of modern maths. As it fully CONFUSES the meaning of dimensions as observed here, BY using the concept to TALK of local parameters of measure. It should have BEEN said that a Hilbert space uses local, generalised coordinates with infinite parameters as we need to quantise with eigenvalues the parameters and potential results of each wave. But as usual the arrogant ego-trips of huminds liked the word ‘dimension too much’ as they like in verbal creationism the word God so they couldn’t help to use it to look really cool – we handle ‘∞ dimensions’, how clever we are LOL.
The solution of problems of quantum mechanics often then requires the computation of eigenvalues of various (usually differential) operators. In some complicated cases the precise solution of these problems turns out to be practically impossible, despite the pretentious absolute precision claimed. For an approximate solution of these problems the so-called perturbation theory is widely used, which enables us to find from the known eigenvalues and functions of a certain self-adjoint operator A the eigenvalues of an operator A1 slightly different from it.

Mathematical physics in 5D ternary time systems.

Now, this post shows simple mathematical basic concepts needed to prove the homology between mathematical physics and fractal structure of the Universe, but powerful enough to prove things like the unification equation of charges and masses, and the experimental proofs of the falsity of the big-bang. Though GST does have a series of deep insights into the meaning of mathematical physics; some of which are necessary to explain here, to fully grasp the absolute relativity of the human position in the Universe and hence how easy and irrelevant will be our demise.

The reductionist ∆o human perspective of physical systems. Degrees of error.

The need for more than a language to describe the wholeness of physical systems.
screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-15-09-10Now it is important to fully grasp why physics is wrong in its concepts and right in its equations. And perhaps the best example could be to compare it with the duality of Chinese language.

In the graph, it is possible to write in Chinese perfectly, as physicists write in equations, and make completely sense, without understanding a dot of it in verbal languages, the ‘natural conceptual language of people’. So a writer of mathematical physics will be right in its equations and fully use them for practical purposes, but it will ignore the conceptual, verbal meaning of those signs. And this is essentially what happens due to the errors of cyclical time and fractal space. Cyclical time measured by frequencies is the inverse of time duration, so in equations, t=1/ƒ are both right. But conceptually we shall ad an entire new ‘world of subtle differences’, thanks to our advanced ‘verbal thought’. Moreover, while there are only a standard ‘traditional’ and modern way to write mathematical physics (due mainly to the evolution of the language of mathematics), the simplified language is quite good to coney most meanings, even if the traditional has much more depth of meaning and symbols. So we shall find that for example, the 4 constructions of gravitation, Newton’s T-vortices of time; Einstein’s, S-imultaneous pictures of the vortices in greater detail; Poison’s gradient in ∆-scales and the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian more elegant, •-mental description, are variations of the same theme; as often in chinese the subtle differences of pronunciation give us variations of meaning.

But if we do not know both languages, the wholeness and richness of Chinese and Physical systems would be lost to us, and we could on top make silly errors, as those foreigners do with the word ma in its 4 tones, unable to distinguish them, and so calling a mother a joint, or even worst, a horse. And physicists, we shall find do have many of those errors, specially when interpreting wrongly Time AS A SINGLE arrow and space as a continuum, LOOSING the 4 ∆•st perspectives of knowledge, the scales of the 5th dimension, the mental limits of languages that describe them and the 3 ages of time and its functional symmetry with the 3 forms of space.

As physics is today mathematical physics, it deals mainly with time and space parameters in different dimensions and scales. As it only acknowledges lineal time, it misses the ternary structure of time arrows, but obviously as its equations works, it merely expresses them in mathematical parameters without its whys which is what ∆ST ads:

We shall study those errors as they were understood historically departing from ∆o, the anthropomorphic human mechanical scale and our sense of entitlement.

So we apply one of the simple rules of epistemological truth in ΓST:’The further away from the human being a science is, the higher the error of its data’.

It is indeed important to introduce the bias of physics from an objective perspective – our definition of the mind as a self-centered o-point; and to study the bias of each discipline of physics, which grows as we come further away from that human perspective. Hence a second rule for the search of truth in physics:

‘As all scales of reality are isomorphic, we must seek errors comparing far away sciences to the truths of systems closer to us’. This means that indeed, as Einstein and Bohm wanted, the way to do physics is NOT to widen the errors of the Copenhagen interpretation with ridiculous theories of parallel Universes etc. but to explain them in a realist way with the guiding pilot wave theory and explain the ‘spooky effects’ with GST isomorphisms, as all of them have a natural explanation in the Generator of Space Time (Ab. gst). So we can fast review the main scales of physics on account of its bias; and establish such order from minus to major, as the proper way to TEACH physics, which is also the historic way, as we have first resolved the most evident stience:

∆0, 1: Mechanics, which is the the most evolved of those disciplines in its details, and the less erroneous as it deal with our external world of ‘evident measure’ and perception.

∆-1,2: The inner, thermodynamic world of our body-motions AND outer world of Geological systems (co-shared with mechanics).

We find now thermal physics a first huge error – the belief that entropy is the single arrow of time; whose cause is sociological and historical in the worldly profession of physicists, and its hyperbolic thirst for taking the place of us, philosophers of stience, as the summit of knowledge  (: it was studied first in the use of cannonballs and weapons and vapor machines, who do indeed waste energy into entropy, and then widened in a galactic statement of self-importance to the shoe Universe with big bang theory, which dismisses the balancing Tiƒ force of in-form-ation, implosive gravitation ).

∆±3: Thus, as we go away from our perspective and introduce other scales we shall observe the growth of uncertainty (quantum) and dark spaces (cosmology) and the astounding anthropomorphic deformation of perspectives introduced to justify them (Copenhagen interpretation, cosmic big-bang, anthropic principle).

Obviously the anthropic principle and the big bang once, we debunk its manipulated data, will appear as just another form of ‘creationist science’ a religious disease which is the commanding influence of economics, a biblical religion of go(l)d profits, as it is today, and the disguised one of so many anthropomorphic errors. The copenhagen interpretation is even more puzzling as we do HAVE a deterministic, far more proper interpretation in the Einstein->Broglie->Bell->Bohm interpretation. And the fact that the illusory ideas of Bohr had dominated the philosophy of quantum physics shows much more about power and anthropomorphism in science that about truth.

Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:

The particle point features heavily in Nuclear physics and it is still a ‘mess’. I like of all of them, the Delta Function, which is ∞ at 0, 0 on the infinite line and 1 in its integral. It is perhaps the best mathematical definition and for that reason, Dirac without understanding what it means – the emergence of a point-particle as a 1-element of a higher ∆+1 scale, made it the non-rigurous foundation of its beautiful quantum thoughts. Then Newman quoted above got berserk. He wanted it to be ‘rigurously’ proved by Hilbert’s axiomatic arrogant method and just make it more messy, pedantic and obtuse.

AXIOMATIC physicists understand little of the organic fractal whys of its systems, and its infallibility theorems, just because ‘mathematics – they believe- is the language of god’ (Galileo) are not always infallible, neither well explained.

In the graph, the final understanding on how 10 ∆-1 ‘tetratkys’ pythagorean elements become a bosonic point of identical beings to emerge in the delta function. It is in that sense connected as the fourier transform from where it ultimately departs, from a fascinating phenomena of the Universe, the emergence through resonance, which I call ‘fusion love’, of a higher being, made of identical parts; as we are all resonances of cloned information; but only in a point the parts transcend into a whole; only in a neuronal small network your infinitesimal ego-mind believes to be infinite.

On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time.

We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of ΓST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

  1.  Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
  2. then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
  3. Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
  4. And only then go through the different scales, Studying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
  5. Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth, as they are closer to the ∆ø mind. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. As Einstein and Planck thought they should be the true reference for all other scales, equivalent in the 0-1 temporal sphere of faster, smaller beings  (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
  6. And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time).  And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly. 

The 3 examples taken here will suffice:  Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions otime to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where ∆ST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of ∆ST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales  are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

The general error: anthropomorphism and lineal worldly profession of weapons’ masters

This said, all physical systems do lack 1/2 of the paradigm – its analysis as supœrganisms which perform world cycles of existence. As all of them sponsor the worldly error of ‘lineal time’, Galileo’s delight for artillery masters, also caused by its worldly profession as makers of weapons (essentially the same error than the thermal one), and all of them deny biological properties to matter (the human must remain the only intelligent, living being).

It is important to remember this ‘paradox of uncertainty’ of human self-centred knowledge, which applies in earnest to those scales, as humans are too far removed from them and so they accept only an abstract, mathematical description, which does not explore as we do here, the biological whys, its world cycles and organic structures, in physical systems.

Hence while physics does study all the scales (maximal range of stiences) it does so with the minimal quantity of properties (reduced mostly to one of the 8 motions, locomotions, and one language, mathematics).

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell

Needless to say we are not writing the encyclopaedia of mathematical physics available to any specialist but ad on all those parts and properties which are not properly written. So in astronomy we shall concentrate in the study of the galaxy as a cell, in quantum theory in the correct Broglie->Bohm model and in thermodynamics in the correction of a single entropy arrow and clarification on the meaning of it, and in all scales in the key concepts of the 3 arrows of time, space, its generators and the concepts of Energy, and the events of physics, which represent GST actions, and key equations to describe them (Fourier, for time scales; Hamiltonians for Energy; Lagrange for balanced actions).

That is, we shall explain why certain basic functions represent most events of physics in terms of the organic ad-ons needed to complete its whys, such as the ST- ‘action of harmonic oscillators’, which is basically a basic ‘feeding-perceiving action that makes the particle fluctuate as it emits a wave of information, upwards to the point of maximal perception and minimal motion (maximal amplitude) and downwards through the 0-coordinates of maximal speed-entropy and minimal height-information.

So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time dimensional forms or ‘Dimotions”.

We shall introduce them here briefly copy-pasting from other posts, before we do a rather ‘classically, ordered’ (for a change:) study of mathematical physics in a historic way, taking basically a classic book text of first year of physics, and introducing all its classic laws with the higher view-mirror of ∆ST.

On the languages of God and the dimensions of time.

The adaptation of physical systems to the 0-5 DiMOTions of the Universe is a daunting task that will take the whole century by huminds or AI, to be fulfilled. A single humind can’t do so much. It will also  require to change the lineal vision of time of the high popes of science today, entropy theorists. So as per Kuhn, resistance to change of paradigm will be extreme. And yet the view of the organic Universe in 5D² is awesome, fulfilling, eternal, unavoidable once it has been discovered ‘again’.

But perhaps the biggest resistance to accept the organic paradigm will come from the humind itself, self-centred and systematically in denial under the ‘ego paradox’ of any living, organic properties to the rest of reality.

Indeed, the whole philosophy underlying physical sciences is common to the scientific wordview that likes to reduce to abstract, mathematical statements the nature of vital reality. In the scholar world we must add an ill-understood philosophy of mathematics, which rejects empiricism within the context of the Greek, Axiomatic rather preposterous method of proving mathematics as a metalanguage whose truth exists within itself. Godel proved with his incompleteness recurrent theorem this a falsity  Yet neither mathematicians or physicists have taken notice. Since the axiomatic method laterally ENCUMBERS man as the only intelligence that seems to talk mathematics with God, ‘the clocker’ of that infamous sentence of Mr. Kepler:

Because of the reductionism of physics to a single locomotion arrow, which due to its simplicity can be calculated with maximal precision physicists tend to be arrogant to other sciences, thinking they know it all about time. Fact is they ignore everything about 4 of the 5 arrows of time.

In the graph, the mind of Kepler, filled with his ego-centered thoughts and God, the geometer, by Blake.

Fact is that even if mathematics were the only language of God, man does not speak very well the language – even a simple computer does it better and likely atoms have a geometric mind that is far more accurate than humans are. So a task pending that we have taken also is the improvement of mathematics as a mirror of the vital Universe.

In any case reality is a bit more complex that its languages, as all languages mirror a set of properties of the Universe but NONE describes them all; since all is information and so ONLY THE WHOLE fits all information within itself. Still mathematics is – no doubt of it – the best, most efficient synoptic language to explain spatial properties, and we shall use it liberally and advance its whys in the section on ‘non-Æ maths’.

But other languages do have perspectives which matter, specially in the analysis of time=change and the biological struggles for existence, and variations in the choice of future paths.  In that sense an enormous handicap is precisely the use of a mechanical clock to measure time, as it expresses only a quantitative, sequential single dimension, which elongated in cartesian graphs gave us the reduction of time dimension to a single lineal v=s/t formulae, as a parameter of space.

Time does DISSAPEARED conceptually and many of its dimensions were never fully understood. This is then the biggest upgrading of 5D² physics.

And to fully grasp the multiple dimensions of time, i-logic verbal thought, with its ‘profound description’ of the past, present and future dimensions with action-verbs and its biological evolutionary theories better described with words becomes essential also in Physics; to find the whys and conceptually define the symmetries between time, space and its scales.

Finally as the source of those languages, the spatial visual and logic languages of time, in which geometry and wor(l)ds are based, must be also come under a new scrutiny. And so we shall use the whole mental scaffolding of human languages, to extract all those properties and apply them to physical systems.

Since the main handicap of physics is its reductionism of properties of matter, by obliging to use only mathematical descriptions. So all what cannot be mirrored with mathematics simply does not exist. And this dogma, which has become a religion of mathematics, latter analysed in more detail, is completely rejected in 5D². As we put new mirrors on matter, new properties will then appear. And the most important of them is the scalar, Nature of matter, which also displays as a result of that co-existence of multiple scales, organic properties. So once we blow the space continuum into multiple scales, and relate them to each other, organicism appears naturally.

Why we love creationist theories: the paradox of the ego.

It is time to bring the paradox of the ego earlier in our analysis of creationist philosophers, as we realise all of mankind believe in them either in a verbal creationism (religious people) or a mathematical creationism (scientists).

What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science and religion is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because it puts man in the centre of the Universe, as the unique master of the language along God.

In the case of mathematical creationism, dominant today, power helps: physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.

The Universe is a concert in a decaphonic scale, with two extremes we can call bass of  open strings of space and treble notes of closed strings of time; 5 treble and 5 bass notes with different beats, rhythms in its ‘time cycles…’

The best notes are those in the middle 5, most go on triads, as they travel up and down three different scales. Of course you might imagine the universal composition is a bit more complicated in its symmetries and triads.

But is also an equation, another ternary language, X operandi Y, and a painting of also three colours, the red of motion, of entropic energy, the green of iteration, of reproduction, the blue of information, and 3 ‘semantic’ names, the subject, the informative centre which acts through a verb on an object it ab=uses as the source of its entropic energy.

Languages mirrors all look though to the same ternary substance, space-time itself.

Let us then consider the two fundamental notes of any language, mirror in its syntax of the ternary structure of it all.

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this.

Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality.

And that is what a true advance in sciences moving away from the age of creationism back to the age of realism should do.

We shall repeat ad nauseam that we will use the same T.œ. laws, and mathematical mirrors of those laws of classic physics but the outcome of an organic entangled interpretation will be completely different.

Of course this is NOT what physics is today; we repeat. Humind egos have reduced the analysis to a distorted view passed through the acceptance of only a language of perception of reality, mathematics, a single dimotion of timespace locomotion (and its maximal limit, entropy) and then the rest is ‘explained’ in abstract, external objective terms as ‘something else’.

We shall also be very critical of another ego trip of reductionist physicists: TO DENY ALL OTHER SCIENCES any saying in the laws of timespace as if it was a proprietary ‘thing’ of physicists experts in Locomotion…

Of course, when you have eliminated the complex dimotions of information, reproduction and social love all WHAT IS LEFT is entropy and locomotion… and the manufacturing of machines of locomotion and entropy (weapons).

The consequences are daring for the future of mankind, a species today ruled by physicists worldview dedicated to locomotions (sports) and entropy (killing) and the making of machines that enhance our skills to do both. But this is NOT what the Universe is about, wants us to do (by reinforcing with sensations we shall call e-motions, the other arrows) but the stubborn, self-destructive, deluded consequence of the wrong path of evolution of our species in its higher informative minds of ‘science’.

CONCLUSION:  IMMORTAL UNIVERSE

‘I want to know the thoughts of God not its details’ Einstein, on the goals of philosophers of science.

 UPGRADING ASTROPHYSICS: THE ‘REAL UNIVERSE’ ONCE WE CORRECT ∆ST ERRORS

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematical physics, should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

  1.  Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
  2. Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
  3. Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
  4. And only then go through the different scales, studying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
  5. Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
  6. And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time).  And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly.

The 3 examples taken here will suffice:  Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions otime to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales  are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

So this paragraph has two themes: upgrading cosmology to the bare minimum to understand the Universe by introducing ∆§calling and ternary time arrows, and then having a few laughs at our popes of science, which don’t even know they know nothing about the whys that really matter in the classic manner of Latin rhetoricians, (‘contra physicos’) Why we do that ONLY with physicists and latter economists and its go(l)d religion should be obvious to any ethic reader:

The entropic world religion of physics and the go(l)d religion of economists is NOT science but an idol-ogy of power based in the use of entropic weapons (entropic metal now entropic machines) and informative money (informative metal: gold, silver, now e-money cycles in machines), which not only include gruesome errors on their models of reality but imperils the future and freedom of life in this planet, with mass-destruction weapons robots automating Factories and terminators making money in splendid little wars and vigilante e-big brothers.

So ‘nothing personal’, even if in my life as an activist for life I have indeed had my battles against the nuclear industry which I will also disclose. Again, I love physics I despise physicists arrogance, ignorance of the living Universe and eviL=anti-live military memes and distortion of the beauty of it all. And as I have zero hypocrisy I am not ‘greasing’ the a$$es of our tribal idols except when they deserve it (Leibniz not Newton, Planck, Broglie and Einstein not Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg, Bohm and Bell not Feynman and Von Newman DID have it right both theoretically and experimentally, and always declined to work in the military industry unlike Newton designing weapons for the royal army, and all the others for the Nuclear Industry, still going strong). So before the laughs the warning:

‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ Einstein

Religious beliefs vs. realist stience

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in